UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 814-01294

SCP Private Credit Income BDC LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(212) 993-1670

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:

Unit

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    Yes  ☐    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

As of December 31, 2020, there was no established public market for the registrant’s units. The issuer had 9,586,174 units outstanding as of February 22, 2021.

SCP PRIVATE CREDIT INCOME BDC LLC

FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item 1. Business

SCP Private Credit Income BDC LLC (the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our”), a Delaware limited liability company formed in May 2018, is a closed-end, externally managed investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). In addition, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we have elected to be treated, and intend to qualify annually, as a regulated investment company (a “RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). As a BDC and a RIC, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. Solar Capital Partners, LLC (the “Adviser” or “SCP”) serves as the Company’s investment adviser.

The Company’s corporate lending strategy is focused on sourcing, underwriting and managing a diverse portfolio of private senior secured loans primarily to upper middle market companies (generally, loan sizes of $100 million to $300 million to companies with earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) between approximately $25 million and $100 million) across the United States. In addition to senior secured loans to upper middle market companies, the Company may invest a portion of its assets in non-traditional asset-based loans and first lien loans to rapidly growing healthcare companies. The Company expects to capitalize on attractive illiquidity premiums across larger private corporate loan tranches and within several specialty lending markets.

The Company was established to provide investors with attractive long-term returns through investments made pursuant to its investment strategy (the Company’s investments in portfolio companies are referred to herein as “Portfolio Investments”).

The Company’s principal focus is to invest in first lien and stretch first lien secured floating rate loans primarily to upper middle market private leveraged companies (generally, loan sizes of $100 million to $300 million to companies with EBITDA between approximately $25 million and $100 million) that have significant free cash flow and are in non-cyclical industries in which our Adviser has direct experience. In addition to senior secured loans to upper middle market companies, the Company may invest a portion of its assets in non-traditional asset-based loans and first lien loans to rapidly growing healthcare companies. The Company also expects that some of its investments will contain delayed-draw term loan type features (which is a legally binding commitment by the Company to fund additional term loans to a borrower in the future) and/or other types of unfunded commitments. The Company will seek to be the single source lender for the majority of its portfolio companies by leveraging the significant capital base at SCP for co-investment opportunities where appropriate. The Company believes many financial sponsors and individual corporate management teams are looking for a single lender to provide the entire debt financing to streamline and simplify the debt negotiation process. In order to provide a single source lender while maintaining the Company’s diversification objectives, the Company expects to co-invest with other vehicles managed by SCP. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to co-invest with such other funds, including as a result of legal restrictions and contractual restrictions and, as a result, the Company may not be able to meet its investment objective. The Company believes the potential scale resulting from co-investments with vehicles managed by SCP will provide the Company a significant advantage to source loans over other lenders that do not have the capital base to provide the entire debt financing.

The Adviser believes the broad expertise of the Adviser’s senior investment team will enable it to successfully identify, assess and structure customized senior secured loans and to manage potential risk and return at all stages of the economic cycle. As an unlisted BDC, the Company is not subject to many of the regulatory limitations that govern traditional lending institutions such as banks. This lack of regulation allows the Adviser to be more flexible than regulated lending institutions in selecting and structuring investments, adjusting investment criteria, transaction structures and, in some cases, the types of securities in which the Company is expected to invest. The Adviser believes financial sponsors, management teams and investment banks see this flexibility as a benefit,

making it an attractive financing partner. The Adviser believes that this approach enables it to procure attractive

2

investment opportunities throughout the economic cycle so that it can make investments consistent with its stated investment objective even during turbulent periods in the capital markets.

Moreover, the Company may opportunistically seek to acquire investments in the secondary market at attractive and/or discounted prices, especially during periods of significant market volatility. In analyzing such investments, the Company will employ a substantially similar analytical process as it uses for its primary investments as well as any prior knowledge of the target company.

The Adviser will seek to create a diverse, predominantly floating rate investment portfolio for the Company. There is no guarantee that the Company will achieve any diversification goals or that even if achieved, an investment in the Company will result in gains to an investor. For the avoidance of doubt, any investment guidelines discussed in this annual report apply to a fully ramped-up portfolio of investments, (i.e., after the Company has invested substantially all of the capital available to the Company in accordance with the Company’s investment strategy) and are based on total available capital including unfunded equity commitments from holders of our units (“Unitholders”).

The Company’s primary area of focus is the U.S. markets. The Company will use commercially reasonable efforts to not, and the Adviser will use commercially reasonable efforts to ensure that the Company will not, make any investments or conduct any activities outside of the U.S.

The Adviser — Solar Capital Partners, LLC

SCP serves as the Company’s investment adviser pursuant to an investment management agreement with the Company (as amended, restated or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Investment Management Agreement”). Subject to the overall supervision of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”), the Adviser is responsible for managing the Company’s business and activities, including sourcing investment opportunities, conducting research, performing diligence on potential investments, structuring our investments, and monitoring the Company’s portfolio companies on an ongoing basis through a team of investment professionals. The managing members of the Adviser are Michael Gross and Bruce Spohler, who also comprise the Adviser’s investment committee (the “Investment Committee”).

The Board of Directors

Overall responsibility for the Company’s operations rests with the Board. The Board is responsible for overseeing the Adviser and other service providers in our operations in accordance with the provisions of the 1940 Act, applicable provisions of state and other laws, and the Limited Liability Company Agreement of the Company (as amended, restated or otherwise modified from time to time, the “LLC Agreement”). The Board currently consists of five members, three of whom are not “interested persons” of SCP as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. The Company refers to these individuals as our independent directors. The Board elects officers, who serve at the discretion of the Board. The responsibilities of each director include, among other things, the oversight of investment activities, the quarterly valuation of assets, and oversight of financing arrangements. The Board has established an audit committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee and may establish additional committees in the future.

Investment Management Agreement

Subject to the overall supervision of the Board, the Adviser manages the investments of, and provide certain services to, the Company pursuant to the Investment Management Agreement, including:

3

The Company and its special-purpose vehicles (such as special-purpose vehicles used for credit facilities or tax blockers) engage or otherwise transact with one or more Service Providers (defined herein) in connection with their investment process, including in respect of Portfolio Investments. “Service Providers” include consultants (including in connection with the acquisition, management and disposition of Portfolio Investments), advisors, transaction finders or sources, operating partners, loan and other servicers, loan and other originators, property and other asset managers, investment bankers, valuation agents, pricing service providers, legal counsel, appraisers, industry or sector experts, joint venture partners and development partners, contract employees, outside legal counsel and/or temporary employees (as well as employees of any of the foregoing), whether working onsite or offsite. Any fees, costs, expenses and liabilities incurred in connection with services provided by Service Providers will be borne (directly or indirectly) by the Company, subject to the cap on operating expenses described under “—Payment of Our Expenses under the Investment Management Agreement”, and will not offset Management Fees (defined herein), and such amounts may be substantial.

Investment Management Agreement Term

Unless terminated earlier as described below, the Investment Management Agreement will remain in effect from year-to-year if approved annually by a majority of the Board or by the holders of a majority of our outstanding voting securities and, in each case, a majority of the independent directors.

The Investment Management Agreement will automatically terminate in the event of its “assignment” within the meaning of the 1940 Act and related Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) guidance and interpretations. In accordance with the 1940 Act, without payment of any penalty, we may terminate the Investment Management Agreement with the Adviser upon 60 days’ written notice. In addition, without payment of any penalty, the Adviser may generally terminate the Investment Management Agreement upon 60 days’ written notice and, in certain circumstances, the Adviser may only be able to terminate the Investment Management Agreement upon 120 days’ written notice.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time during the term of the Investment Management Agreement, the Adviser may assign the full and exclusive authority and responsibility granted to it under the Investment Management Agreement to an investment adviser under common control with the Adviser, subject to applicable law. The Adviser may take any actions that are necessary or incidental to any such assignment, including assigning the Investment Management Agreement or causing the Company to enter into a new Investment Management Agreement. It is expected that (x) any new investment adviser would be a registered investment

4

adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”), (y) the management fee and incentive fee payable by the Company to such entities would be identical to that payable to the Adviser and (z) certain of the investment professionals would continue to be responsible for managing the Company’s assets.

Compensation of Adviser

Pursuant to the Investment Management Agreement we have entered into with the Adviser, we pay the Adviser a fee for investment advisory and management services consisting of two components: a base management fee and an incentive fee. The Adviser has also been appointed to provide administrative and coordination services to the Company (in such capacity, the “Administrative Coordinator”). We pay the Administrative Coordinator an administration fee for administrative and coordination services. The cost of the base management fee, the incentive fee, and the administration fee will ultimately be borne by our Unitholders.

Management Fees and Administration Fees

The Company pays the Adviser a management fee (the “Management Fee”), calculated as of the close of business in New York, New York on the last day of each calendar quarter (each such date, the “Management Fee Calculation Date”), in an amount equal to 1.5% per annum of Invested Capital (defined as, as of any date, the sum of (i) capital contributions to the Company plus (ii) the total amount of credit drawn on subscription credit facilities), and payable quarterly in arrears after such Management Fee Calculation Date.

The Company pays the Administrative Coordinator, a fee (the “Administration Fee”), calculated as of the close of business in New York, New York on the last day of each calendar quarter (the “Administration Fee Calculation Date”), in an amount equal to 0.08% per annum of the average Cost Basis (defined as, as of any date, the aggregate accreted and amortized cost of all portfolio investments (including (i) any amounts reinvested in portfolio investments and (ii) the cost of portfolio investments acquired using leverage), as measured on the last day of the preceding quarter and the last day of the current quarter for the period ended and payable quarterly in arrears after such Administration Fee Calculation Date. The Administration Fee does not offset any fees paid to the Adviser. The Administrative Coordinator is responsible for all expenses of its own staff responsible for (i) certain on-going, routine, non-investment-related administrative services for the Company, (ii) the coordination of various third party services needed or required by the Company and (iii) certain Unitholder servicing functions.

Each of the Management Fee and the Administration Fee are appropriately adjusted for any stub period. Such fees are paid out of net current income and/or disposition proceeds or, to the extent such amounts are not available, from unfunded capital commitments that will be drawn down, or borrowings of the Company. The Adviser reserves the right, upon approval of the Board, to waive the Management Fee and the Administrative Coordinator reserves the right, upon approval of the Board, to waive the Administration Fee to which each is entitled in respect of all Unitholders’ Units.

Incentive Fee

The Company makes distributions out of two categories: Current Proceeds and Disposition Proceeds (collectively referred to as “Investment Proceeds”). “Disposition Proceeds” means all amounts received by the Company upon the disposition of an investment, including full or partial repayments or amortization of principal (but excluding Current Proceeds). “Current Proceeds” means all proceeds from investments, including interest income, fee income, warrant gains, prepayment fees and exit fees, other than Disposition Proceeds. The Adviser apportions each Unitholder’s pro rata share of Investment Proceeds between Disposition Proceeds and Current Proceeds. Amounts of Investment Proceeds apportioned to Unitholders are divided between and distributed to Unitholders, on the one hand, and the Adviser, on the other hand, in the following amounts and order of priority:

(i) First, Return of Capital Contributions: 100% of amounts constituting Disposition Proceeds to Unitholders until each Unitholder has received cumulative distributions of Disposition Proceeds

5

pursuant to this clause (i) equal to each Unitholder’s total capital contributions to the Company (including amounts contributed to pay Management Fees, Administration Fees, Organizational Expenses (as defined below) and other Company expenses). Amounts constituting Current Proceeds proceed to clause (ii) and are not returned under this clause (i);

(ii) Second, Unitholder Preferred Return: 100% of all remaining Investment Proceeds to Unitholders until they have each received distributions, without duplication, pursuant to this clause (ii) and clause (iv) below equal to a 6% per annum return, compounded annually, on Unitholders’ unreturned capital contributions to the Company (including amounts contributed to pay Management Fees, Administration Fees, Organizational Expenses and other Company expenses);

(iii) Third, Adviser Catch Up: 80% of all remaining Investment Proceeds to the Adviser, as a “catch up” distribution with respect to its incentive fee, until the Adviser has received distributions of Investment Proceeds with respect to Unitholders pursuant to this clause (iii) equal to 15% of the total amounts distributed to Unitholders and the Adviser with respect to Unitholders pursuant to clause (ii) above and this clause (iii); and

(iv) Fourth, 85%/15% Units: 85% to Unitholders and 15% to the Adviser as an incentive fee.

In no event will the Adviser receive amounts attributable to Disposition Proceeds that, as of any distribution or payment date, exceeds 20% of cumulative realized capital gains net of all cumulative realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation.

The Adviser may also elect not to receive all or any portion of the incentive fee that would otherwise be distributed to it, and may cause any or all amounts subsequently available for distribution to the Unitholders to be distributed to the Adviser until it has received the same aggregate amount of incentive fees had it not previously waived receipt of incentive fees.

The Adviser is entitled to withhold from any distributions, in its discretion, any required tax withholdings. Amounts of taxes paid or withheld from amounts otherwise distributable to a Unitholder is deemed distributed for purposes of the calculations above.

Limitation of Liability and Indemnification

The Investment Management Agreement provides that the Adviser (which includes, for all purposes of this paragraph, its members, principals, officers, managers, investors, employees and other representatives and agents and entities controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser) will not be liable to the Company or to the Unitholders for any loss suffered by the Company or the Unitholders which arises out of any action or inaction of the Adviser taken or made by the Adviser in good faith and in the belief that such action or inaction is in or is not contrary to the best interests of the Company, except for any loss resulting from fraud, willful misfeasance, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties of the Adviser in the conduct of the Adviser’s office, and except as otherwise required by applicable law. In addition, the Company will indemnify and hold harmless the Adviser, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, against any loss resulting from claims or threatened claims with respect to the Adviser’s performance or non-performance of its obligations pursuant to the Investment Management Agreement, except for any such loss resulting from fraud, willful misfeasance, gross negligence or reckless disregard of duties of the Adviser in the conduct of the Adviser’s office.

Adviser Clawback

Upon liquidation of the Company, the Adviser will be required to restore funds to the Company for distribution to the Unitholders if and to the extent that the Adviser has received cumulative incentive fees in excess of the incentive fees that would have been payable to the Adviser on an aggregate basis covering all transactions of the

6

Company; provided, however, that in no event will the Adviser be required to contribute an aggregate amount in excess of 100% of the net amount distributed to the Adviser (net of taxes) on account of its incentive fees. In addition, the Adviser will apply an interim incentive fee adjustment at the end of each fiscal year so that, in the event of any over-distribution of incentive fee to the Adviser (measured with respect to each Unitholder using the fair value of the Company’s portfolio at the end of the applicable fiscal year as if the Company were to liquidate on such date), future distributions that would, absent such interim incentive fee adjustment, otherwise be distributed to the Adviser as an incentive fee, shall be distributed to such Unitholder until such over-distribution (net of taxes payable by the Adviser with respect to such incentive fee) has been eliminated.

Administration Services

Pursuant to the Investment Management Agreement, the Adviser has also been appointed as Administrative Coordinator to provide administrative and coordination services to the Company. The Administrative Coordinator supervises or provides the Company’s administrative services, including operational trade support, net asset value calculations, financial reporting, fund accounting, registrar and transfer agent services. The Administrative Coordinator provides assistance to the Adviser in connection with communicating with investors and other persons with respect to the Company. The Administrative Coordinator, when acting in its administrative capacity, will not provide any investment advisory or investment management services to the Company. Pursuant to the Investment Management Agreement, the Company pays the Administrative Coordinator the Administration Fee for its services.

The Investment Management Agreement contains limitations on liability and indemnifications in favor of the Administrative Coordinator, provided that the Administrative Coordinator’s actions do not constitute fraud, bad faith, gross negligence or willful misconduct (collectively, “Wrongful Conduct”). The Administrative Coordinator’s liability to the Company is subject to an overall cap (except where the Administrative Coordinator has engaged in Wrongful Conduct). In the event that the Administrative Coordinator is terminated or resigns as the administrative coordinator to the Company, the Board reserves the ability to appoint one or more different or replacement administrative coordinators in its sole discretion at any time without notice to the Unitholders, or to assume the Administrative Coordinator’s role on the same or similar terms in providing administration services to the Company.

Concurrently with the review and approval of the Investment Management Agreement, our Board will review and approve the engagement of the Administrative Coordinator on an annual basis. In connection with such approval, the Board, including a majority of independent directors, reviews the engagement of the Administrative Coordinator to determine that the relevant provisions of the Investment Management Agreement are carried out satisfactorily and to determine, among other things, whether the fees payable to the Administrative Coordinator are reasonable in light of the services provided. The Board also considers the possibility of obtaining such services from a different third party and whether any other third party service provider would be capable of providing all such services at comparable cost, quality and timeliness.

Payment of Our Expenses under the Investment Management Agreement

The Company (directly or indirectly) bears:

7

In addition, the aggregate amount of the operating expenses relating to Unitholders investing directly in the Company set forth in clauses (ii)-(iv) and the operating expenses included in sub-clauses (xiii) and (xvi) related to U.S. regulatory bodies above borne by the Company (directly or indirectly) will not exceed the following limits in any fiscal year: (A) if the Company has less than or equal to $400 million in commitments of capital (each a “Commitment”), an amount equal to the sum of (x) the product of the Commitments and 0.0025 and (y) $1.25 million, or (B) if the Company has greater than $400 million in Commitments, $2.25 million (such figure,

8

the “Operating Expense Cap”). Any amount in excess of the Operating Expense Cap for any fiscal year will be paid by the Adviser. Solely by way of example, if Commitments equal $350,000,000, the Operating Expense Cap will be equal to $2,125,000. For the avoidance of doubt, the Operating Expense Cap will not apply to any fees, costs, expenses and liabilities allocable to persons investing indirectly in the Company through any Unitholder.

For the avoidance of doubt, the Company will not bear the costs of any third-party valuation agent engaged solely for purposes of valuing the net asset value of the Company.

The Adviser or Administrative Coordinator and/or their affiliates had advanced organizational and offering expenses to the Company, which include organizational fees, costs, expenses and liabilities of the Company, including legal expenses, incurred in connection with the initial offering of Units and the formation and establishment of the Company. The Adviser or Administrative Coordinator (or such affiliate) will be reimbursed by the Company for such advanced expenses in an amount not to exceed $500,000. $307,563 of offering expenses were charged to capital and $83,589 of organizational costs were expensed in 2019.

Placement Agreement

The Company has retained certain third parties to find potential investors (each a “Placement Agent”). If an investor purchases through a Placement Agent, the Adviser may be subject to finder-related fees, the arrangements of which are set forth in detail in our Private Placement Memorandum.

Use of Name

Pursuant to the LLC Agreement, SCP has granted us a non-exclusive license to use the name “Solar Capital Partners” or “SCP” as the name of the Company and in connection with the marketing and operation of the Company. We have a right to use the SCP name for so long as the Adviser or one of its affiliates remains our investment adviser. Other than with respect to this limited license, we have no legal right to the “SCP” name or logo.

Market Opportunity

The Company focuses on providing private corporate loans to upper middle market companies in the United States. We believe that the Company is well-positioned to provide a superior risk-adjusted return relative to publicly traded corporate bonds and loans for the following reasons:

Premium pricing in private corporate loans over public high yield and syndicated leveraged loans

Capturing illiquidity premiums: The illiquid nature of private corporate loans results in lenders earning an “illiquidity premium” over public high yield and syndicated leveraged loans.

9

Capturing size and risk premium: Middle market lenders also typically receive a premium relative to larger company loan investors to compensate them for investing in smaller companies and in niche industries. Middle market companies tend to be less followed by investors and research analysts and typically have lower ratings from ratings agencies due to their size. As a result, we expect that there will be a smaller investor base while demand will remain robust, resulting in premium pricing for middle market borrowers.

Capitalizing on market inefficiencies: We believe that the market investing inefficiencies are greater in the private middle market, which allows lenders to capture higher risk-adjusted returns. We believe that, among others, the drivers of middle market inefficiencies include the following: information asymmetry, the analytical complexity in evaluating private middle market companies, the need for long-dated capital that typically requires higher return expectation, fewer and more sophisticated lenders, and the requirement to underwrite to maturity as opposed to a trade.

Stronger underwriting process in private corporate loans versus public high yield and syndicated leveraged loans

Deeper due diligence: Private corporate lenders are typically able to conduct detailed due diligence, often alongside the financial sponsor acquiring the company, which provides the lender significantly more time to form a more comprehensive understanding of the company, including its competitive position and risks. In contrast, public high yield and syndicated leveraged loan investors are typically provided a single syndication meeting and minimal access to diligence materials before placing their order.

Inclusion of covenants: Covenants are contractual restrictions that lenders place on companies to limit the corporate actions a company can pursue that are negative to the lender and act as warning signals for lenders. The loans in which the Company is expected to invest are expected to have comprehensive covenants including covenants that are tested on a recurring basis to ensure ongoing compliance (“maintenance covenants”). Although syndicated leveraged loans have covenants, nearly 80% of loans currently are “covenant-lite,” which means they do not have a complete set of financial covenants, thus providing borrower companies more freedom to negatively impact lenders. High yield bonds provide even weaker protection for lenders because they typically have incurrence-based covenants, which are only tested if the company issues more debt.

Ability to exert greater influence over the negotiation of lending terms: Private corporate loan terms are negotiated directly by the lender(s) and the company, therefore removing the underwriting bank that negotiates the terms for public high yield or syndicated leveraged loans. This allows the private corporate lender to customize the terms to mitigate risks and address the unique needs of the company.

Lower default rates and higher recovery rates: The result of the more comprehensive underwriting process for private corporate loans is historically lower default rates and higher recovery rates than public high yield or syndicated loans. Based on data from S&P on the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index the historical average default rate for middle market loans was 2.4% while the default rate for broadly syndicated loans was 3.6%. Similarly, the loss rate for defaulted middle market loans from 1995 to 2018 was 0.5%, while the loss rate for syndicated leveraged loans was 0.9%.

Access to specialized lending markets with attractive return and risk characteristics

Single source lending to the upper middle market: We believe financial sponsors and management teams are increasingly looking for a single lender to provide the entire debt financing to

10

streamline and simplify the debt negotiation process. In the upper middle market (generally, loan tranche sizes of $100 million to $300 million to companies with EBITDA between approximately $25 million and $100 million), we believe that there is a limited number of lenders with the capital base to provide the entire debt financing. Because the Company expects to co-invest with other SCP vehicles on an opportunistic basis, the Company is expected to be well-positioned to take advantage of this opportunity to source and structure attractive cash flow loans.

Non-traditional asset-based lending: As a result of increased lending regulations following the financial crisis, as well as the specialized skill set and infrastructure required to value and monitor collateral, we believe that asset-rich middle market companies in a period of transition typically have limited access to providers of traditional asset-based financing, such as the high-yield bond market or syndicated loans. We believe this supply-demand imbalance creates an opportunity for non-traditional asset-based lenders, such as the Company, to source and structure attractive asset-based loans.

Lending to rapidly developing healthcare companies: As a result of the highly-specialized skills required to evaluate these investment opportunities, we believe that the Company will be one of the few sources of capital capable of lending to healthcare companies who are in need of additional debt capital. Asset-based loans to these companies, with strong sponsorship and demonstrated product pipelines, have the potential to provide a compelling risk-adjusted return.

Investment Selection

The Company has a broad, flexible investment mandate, and the Company is not subject to any investment guidelines, limitations or restrictions other than as set forth in this section. However, as a BDC, the Company is subject to certain limitations on the types of investments it is permitted to make.

The Company generally expects to invest in portfolio companies based in the U.S., including portfolio companies in the broadly-defined healthcare and life sciences industries.

Interpretation of the day-to-day applications of the guidelines described below will be made by the Adviser in its sole discretion, and any limitation will generally be measured, if applicable, based upon good faith estimates using data known to the Adviser at such time. The Company is subject to the guidelines described below commencing on the date that is one year after the final closing date of the Company. For purposes of clarity, the guidelines described below will take into account only direct investments of the Company (including investments by the Company’s special-purpose vehicles).

The Company uses reasonable best efforts to achieve the guidelines set forth below. For purposes of the below guidelines, the Company’s “total portfolio” will equal the total amount of Commitments plus the Company’s total expected leverage, as reasonably determined by the Company. In addition, the Adviser may consider the impact of hedging transactions, and of cash and cash equivalents in the portfolio, in applying the below guidelines.

The below guidelines shall in no way restrict or otherwise limit the Company’s ability to acquire an investment in an issuer that is sufficiently large (as determined by the Adviser in its discretion) to enable the Company to influence or control any restructuring, work-out and/or bankruptcy process in accordance with the Company’s investment program.

Secured Loans

The Company expects to invest at least 90% of its total portfolio in secured loans.

11

Floating Rate Loans

The Company expects to invest at least 85% of its total portfolio in floating rate loans.

Lower Middle Market Issuers

It is expected, at the time of investment, that the Company will not make an investment in a lower middle market corporate issuer (i.e., less than $15 million of EBITDA) if the Company’s aggregate investments in such issuer would, solely as a result of such investment, exceed 15% of the greater of (i) the Company’s total portfolio and (ii) the market value of the Company’s assets. This limit does not apply to investments in asset-based loans (“ABL”) or Life Science issuers.

Minimum Number of Portfolio Companies

It is expected that the Company will invest in at least 18 companies.

Concentration of Top 10 Positions

It is expected that the Company’s top 10 investments will not exceed 60% of the greater of (i) the Company’s total portfolio and (ii) the market value of the Company’s assets.

Single Issuer

It is expected that the Company will not make an investment in an issuer if the Company’s aggregate investments in such issuer would, solely as a result of such investment, exceed 7.5% of the greater of (i) the Company’s total

portfolio and (ii) the market value of the Company’s assets. It is expected that the Company will not make more than four (4) such investments and that the balance of the Company’s investments will be 5% or less of the greater of (i) the Company’s total portfolio and (ii) the market value of the Company’s assets.

Single Industry

It is expected that the Company will not make an investment in an issuer conducting its principal operations in a particular industry or sub-industry if the Company’s aggregate investments in all such issuers principally operating in such industry or sub-industry would, solely as a result of such investment, exceed 15% of the greater of (i) the Company’s total portfolio and (ii) the market value of the Company’s assets. In making determinations (e.g., industry or sub-industry sectors and classifications) relating to this guideline, the Adviser may utilize various sources that result in determinations that are narrower or otherwise different than determinations from other sources that SCP uses for its other clients.

Geographic Limitations

It is expected that the Company will not make investments in issuers that have their principal place of business located outside of the United States.

Target and Maximum ABL and Life Science Investments

It is expected that the Company’s investments in ABL companies and Life Science issuers will both be between 10% and 15% of the greater of (i) the Company’s total portfolio and (ii) the market value of the Company’s assets. It is also expected that the Company will not make an investment in an ABL or Life Science issuer if the Company’s aggregate investments in all such issuers would, solely as a result of such investment, exceed 40% of the greater of (i) the Company’s total portfolio and (ii) the market value of the Company’s assets.

12

Leverage

The Company is required to comply with the asset coverage requirements of the 1940 Act. The Company expects to employ leverage and otherwise incur indebtedness with respect to the portfolio both on a recourse and non-recourse basis (including and potentially through guarantees, derivatives, forward commitments and reverse repurchase agreements), but will not exceed the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. The Company is generally permitted, under specified conditions, to issue senior securities in amounts such that the Company’s asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least equal to 150% immediately after such issuance. In connection with the organization of the Company, the Adviser, as the initial Unitholder, has authorized the Company to adopt the 150% asset coverage ratio. In connection with their subscriptions of the Units, our Unitholders are required to acknowledge our ability to operate with an asset coverage ratio that may be as low as 150%. The Company will be exposed to the risks of leverage, which may be considered a speculative investment technique. The use of leverage magnifies the potential for gain and loss on amounts invested and therefore increases the risks associated with investing in our securities. In addition, the costs associated with our borrowings, including any increase in the management fee payable to the Adviser will be borne by our Unitholders.

It is currently expected that the Company will generally target, for directly borrowed funds, average leverage, excluding any subscription or similar credit facilities, of (i) with respect to Corporate investments, a

debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 1.5-to-1, and (ii) with respect to ABL and Life Science investments, a debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 1-to-1 (in each case, calculated excluding both the portion of any investment that the Company expects to syndicate, transfer or otherwise dispose of within 180 days of acquisition and any borrowings with respect thereto).

Investment Process Overview

We are committed to our value-oriented investment philosophy, with a focus on the preservation of capital and a commitment to managing downside exposure.

Proprietary Sourcing and Origination

We believe that SCP’s senior investment professionals’ longstanding relationships with financial sponsors, corporate management teams, commercial and investment banks and other financial intermediaries provide us with a strong pipeline of proprietary origination opportunities. We believe the broad expertise of our senior investment team and their ability to draw upon their average of over 20 years of investment experience enables us to identify, assess and structure investments successfully.

We expect that the Company will benefit from SCP’s extensive experience investing in middle market companies. With the benefit of approximately $10 billion of investments made to over 400 companies as of December 31, 2020, SCP has developed an extensive database of information on middle market issuers and industries. The Adviser’s investment team is expected to include a number of SCP’s specialists in cash flow lending to sponsor-backed companies, asset-based lending and healthcare lending. We believe that the in-depth experience of SCP’s investment team in investing throughout various stages of the economic cycle provides us with access to ongoing market insights in addition to a powerful asset for investment sourcing.

Our senior investment team’s strong relationship network is enhanced by the collaborative role SCP plays in the private equity industry. SCP is an independent credit platform that does not pursue traditional private equity strategies, so the Company is not expected to be seen as a competitive threat to financial sponsors seeking to acquire a company. Our ability to offer tailored solutions, certainty of capital and scale is expected to provide us with greater deal flow. We also expect that our reputation as a constructive partner and a flexible “solutions provider” with a proven ability to evaluate highly complex situations should result in the ability to source a significant number of investment opportunities for the Company.

13

Additionally, the investment team has a well-developed network of relationships that includes industry executives, consultants, traders, brokers, advisors, lawyers, accountants, investment bankers and other industry sources, which can result in early notification of developing investment opportunities.

Due Diligence

Our “private equity” approach to credit investing typically incorporates extensive in-depth due diligence often alongside the financial sponsor. In conducting due diligence, we use publicly available information as well as information from the investment team’s extensive relationships with former and current management teams, consultants, competitors and investment bankers. We believe our due diligence methodology allows us to screen a high volume of potential investment opportunities on a consistent and thorough basis. Furthermore, we believe that the combination of our extensive industry knowledge and relationships provide the Company a significant advantage in identifying potential risks.

Our due diligence typically includes:

We also expect to evaluate the financial sponsor making the investment. Further, due to SCP’s considerable repeat business with sponsors, the Adviser’s investment team has direct experience with the management teams of many sponsors. A financial sponsor is typically the controlling shareholder upon completion of an investment and as such is considered critical to the success of the investment. The financial sponsor is evaluated using several key criteria, including:

Throughout the due diligence process, a deal team is in frequent dialogue with the management team and sponsor of the company in which we are considering to invest to ensure that any concerns are addressed as early as possible through the process, which we believe increases the likelihood that unsuitable investments are filtered out before considerable time has been invested.

Upon the completion of due diligence and a decision to proceed with an investment in a company, the investment professionals leading the investment present the investment opportunity to the Investment Committee, which then determines the initial investment. Additional due diligence with respect to any investment may be conducted on our behalf by attorneys and independent accountants prior to the closing of the investment, as well as other outside advisers, as appropriate.

14

Portfolio Company Characteristics

We have identified several criteria that we believe are important in identifying and investing in prospective portfolio companies. These criteria provide general guidelines for investment decisions; however, not all of these criteria will be met by each prospective portfolio company in which we choose to invest.

For our cash flow loans to upper middle market companies, we generally seek companies that we believe will provide a steady stream of cash flow to repay our loans and reinvest in their respective businesses. We believe that such internally generated cash flow, leading to the payment of our interest and the repayment of our principal, represents a key means by which we will be able to exit from our investments over time. In addition, we also seek to invest in companies whose business models and expected future cash flows offer attractive exit possibilities. These companies include candidates for strategic acquisition by other industry participants and companies that may repay our investments through an initial public offering of units or another capital market transaction. We underwrite our investments on a held-to-maturity basis, but expensive capital is often repaid prior to stated maturity. Historically SCP’s investment portfolio has resulted in a three year average life.

Our investment teams work in concert with sponsors to proactively manage investment opportunities by acting as a partner throughout the investment process. We actively focus on the middle-market financial sponsor community, with a particular focus on the upper-end of the middle-market (sponsors with equity funds of $500 million to $5 billion). We favor such sponsors because they typically:

15

We divide our coverage of these sponsors among our more senior investment professionals, who are responsible for day-to-day interaction with financial sponsors. Our coverage approach aims to act proactively, consider all investments in the capital structure, provide quick feedback, deliver on commitments, and are constructive throughout the life cycle of an investment.

Structure of Investments

We seek to invest in portfolio companies primarily in the form of first lien senior secured loans and first lien stretch senior secured loans. We seek to obtain security interests in the assets of our portfolio companies that serve as collateral in support of the repayment of these loans. We expect that this collateral will take the form of first priority liens on all of the assets of a portfolio company. Opportunistically, we will invest in senior secured loans with second priority liens on the assets of the portfolio company. We may make investments that have a delayed draw feature, which may be viewed as unfunded commitments. We believe that the Company will have sufficient assets to provide adequate cover to satisfy any such unfunded commitments.

Upper Middle Market Cash Flow Lending

Typically, we expect that the Company’s senior secured loans to middle market companies will have a first priority lien on all of the assets of the issuer, may be floating rate, may include upfront fees and may include meaningful prepayment penalties. Covenants are typically included. The loans generally are expected to have a five to six year final maturity and are often repaid within three years.

Middle Market Asset-based Lending

Typically, we expect that the Company’s asset-based loans will have a first priority lien or second priority lien on the assets of the issuer, may be floating rate, and may include upfront fees and meaningful prepayment penalties. As part of the underwriting process, we expect to receive a third-party valuation of the collateral and lend at a discount to the liquidation value. Borrowing base and maintenance covenants are generally expected to be included. The loans generally are expected to have a three to five year final maturity and are often repaid within one to two years.

We plan to differentiate ourselves by focusing on transitional borrowers, which are companies that are either experiencing a restructuring, are capital constrained, have tight execution timelines or have limited access to traditional lenders.

Opportunities in the asset-based lending strategy are not sourced from financial sponsors but from a variety of regional banks, consultants, other asset-based lenders and companies themselves, with the deals that have historically progressed through SCP’s preliminary review having come from 90+ different sources.

Lending to Rapidly Developing Healthcare Companies

Typically, we expect that the Company’s loans to healthcare companies will have a first priority lien, will be floating rate, and will include meaningful prepayment penalties, exit fees and success fees. The loans may

16

include equity features, such as warrants or options to buy a minority interest in the portfolio company. We expect that these warrants will generally have a nominal exercise price and, thus, as a portfolio company appreciates in value, the Company will be well-positioned to achieve additional investment returns from this equity interest. The loans generally are expected to have a 12 to 18 month interest only period and then straight-line amortization with a four to five year final maturity. These loans are often repaid within two to three years.

Transaction Selection

Following the team’s rigorous due diligence process, the transaction team will discuss the potential investment opportunity with the Investment Committee. Such discussion will often include detailed analyses of various factors, such as (i) the cash flow value creation for cash flow loans, (ii) historic and projected financials, (iii) the key drivers of revenues and the balance between unit volumes and price factors, (iv) key cost components, including raw materials, labor, overhead, insurance, etc., (v) capital expenditures, (vi) working capital needs, (vii) micro and macroeconomic trends that impact the business and industry, (viii) the business’s products and its sales channels, (ix) qualitative analysis of company management, (x) the competitive dynamics of the industry and the target company’s position, (xi) input from third-party consultants, (xii) potential exit considerations, and/or (xiii) a range of other factors relating to a given opportunity. For asset based loans, the core focus is on the Company’s liquidity profile, the liquidation value of the assets or portfolio, quality of controls and procedures, the quality of management, and regulatory risk. For life science lending, the core focus is on the quality of the Company’s product pipeline and stage of development, the investor base and access to additional capital and liquidity, and the quality of management.

It is expected that the Investment Committee will approve or reject investment recommendations, although it may delegate other decisions (including decisions relating to cash management and similar non-material transactions (which shall not be considered “investments” for these purposes), diligence decisions, decisions relating to transactions involving material non-public information and decisions relating to the engagement of consultants, law firms and other service providers) to other investment professionals in their sole discretion. The composition, structure and/or operations of the Investment Committee may change from time to time, each without the consent of or notice to Unitholders.

Ongoing Relationships with Portfolio Companies

We will monitor our portfolio companies on an ongoing basis. We will monitor the financial trends of each portfolio company to determine if it is meeting its business plan and to assess the appropriate course of action for each company.

We have several methods of evaluating and monitoring the performance and fair value of our investments, which include the following:

In addition to various risk management and monitoring tools, the Adviser also uses an investment rating system to characterize and monitor our expected level of returns on each investment in our portfolio.

17

We use an investment rating scale of 1 to 4. The following is a description of the conditions associated with each investment rating:

We will monitor and, when appropriate, change the investment ratings assigned to each investment in our portfolio.

Competition

Our primary competitors provide financing to middle-market companies and include other business development companies, commercial and investment banks, commercial financing companies and, to the extent they provide an alternative form of financing, private equity funds. Additionally, alternative investment vehicles, such as hedge funds, frequently invest in middle-market companies. As a result, competition for investment opportunities at middle-market companies can be intense. While many middle market companies were previously able to raise senior debt financing through traditional large financial institutions, we believe this approach to financing will become more difficult as implementation of U.S. and international financial reforms limits the capacity of large financial institutions to hold non-investment grade leveraged loans on their balance sheets. We believe that many of these financial institutions have de-emphasized their service and product offerings to middle market companies in particular. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, many of our competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a BDC. We use the industry information available to Michael S. Gross and Bruce Spohler and the other investment professionals of SCP to assess investment risks and determine appropriate pricing for our investments in portfolio companies. In addition, we believe that the relationships of Michael S. Gross and Bruce Spohler and the other investment professionals of our investment adviser enable us to learn about, and compete effectively for, financing opportunities with attractive leveraged companies in the industries in which we seek to invest.

Term

On October 5, 2018 (the “Initial Closing Date”), the Company closed on $326,000,000 in capital commitments. The offering period of the Company ended on April 5, 2019 (the “Offering Period”), six months after the Initial Closing Date. The term of the Company will be six years from the end of the Offering Period unless the Company is liquidated earlier as set forth in the LLC Agreement, but may be extended by the board of directors for up to two consecutive one year periods upon approval of the Company’s independent directors and the approval of unitholders of the Company (“Unitholders”), which approval will be obtained through a non-1940 Act vote as described in the LLC Agreement. The Company may be dissolved and its affairs wound up prior to the end of the term under the circumstances set forth in the LLC Agreement. The fiscal year end of the Company is December 31.

18

Emerging Growth Company

We are an emerging growth company as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”) and we are eligible to take advantage of certain specified reduced disclosure and other requirements that are otherwise generally applicable to public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”). We expect to remain an emerging growth company for up to five years following the completion of any IPO or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenues exceed $1.0 billion, (ii) December 31 of the fiscal year that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the 1934 Act which would occur if the market value of our units that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700.0 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter and we have been publicly reporting for at least 12 months or (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities during the preceding three-year period. In addition, we will take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the 1933 Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards.

Staffing

We do not currently have any employees. Mr. Gross, our Co-Chief Executive Officer and a board member, and Mr. Spohler, our Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer and a board member, are managing members and senior investment professionals of, and have financial and controlling interests in, SCP. In addition, Mr. Peteka, our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary serves as the Chief Financial Officer for SCP. Guy Talarico, our Chief Compliance Officer, is the Chief Executive Officer of Alaric Compliance Services, LLC, and serves as our Chief Compliance Officer.

Pursuant to the Investment Management Agreement, the Company has delegated full and exclusive authority and responsibility to the Adviser to invest, reinvest and dispose of the assets of the Company, and (together with the Administrative Coordinator) to manage the day-to-day operations of the Company, subject to the overall supervision of the Board. The Adviser is authorized to delegate all, or any such part as it deems appropriate, of its discretionary management and investment advisory authority and responsibility to any of its members or their respective affiliates.

The Private Offering

The Company is organized primarily for investors who may invest through one or more investment funds created by one or more financial institutions unaffiliated with the Company (collectively, the “Access Fund”). Certain other investors may also invest directly in the Company. For those investors who invest through the Access Fund, we expect that the Access Fund will issue a pro rata interest to each investor in the Access Fund (the “Access Fund Investors”) that, with respect to each Access Fund Investor’s investment in the Access Fund, corresponds to the pro rata share of the Units issued by the Company to the Access Fund. We also expect that Units will only be sold (i) in the U.S. only to U.S. persons who are “accredited investors” within the meaning of Regulation D under the 1933 Act and (ii) outside the U.S. in accordance with Regulation S under the 1933 Act. Upon a sale of Units to an investor, we expect that the Access Fund will pass its voting rights in the Company through to the Access Fund Investors.

Key Person Event

Prior to the end of the period from the Initial Closing Date until the date that is three (3) years after the end of the Offering Period of the Company (the “Investment Period”), if both Michael Gross and Bruce Spohler (the “Principals”) die, become permanently incapacitated or cease to be actively involved in the management of the Company, the Investment Period shall terminate and the Company shall be wound down in accordance with the terms of the LLC Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, if only one of the Principals dies or becomes

19

permanently incapacitated, the preceding sentence will not be triggered. If either Principal voluntarily ceases to be actively involved in the management of the Company, the Company will suspend the Investment Period. If an acceptable replacement is not identified and approved by (i) the independent directors of the Company and (ii) the Unitholders subject to any requirements of the 1940 Act, within 90 days following the suspension of the Investment Period, the Investment Period shall terminate and all new investment activity shall cease.

Regulation as a Business Development Company

A BDC is regulated by the 1940 Act. A BDC must be organized in the U.S. for the purpose of investing in or lending to primarily private companies and making significant managerial assistance available to them. A BDC may use capital provided by public unitholders and from other sources to make long-term, private investments in businesses.

The Company may not change the nature of its business so as to cease to be, or withdraw our election as, a BDC unless authorized by vote of a majority of outstanding voting securities, as required by the 1940 Act. A majority of the outstanding voting securities of a company is defined under the 1940 Act as the lesser of: (a) 67% or more of such company’s voting securities present at a meeting if more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of such company are present or represented by proxy, or (b) more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of such company. However, by signing a Subscription Agreement with the Company, each Unitholder is providing the approval required by the 1940 Act to effectuate the withdrawal of the Company’s election to be regulated as a BDC concurrently with the liquidation or dissolution of the Company. The Company does not anticipate any substantial change in the nature of our business.

As with other companies regulated by the 1940 Act, a BDC must adhere to certain substantive regulatory requirements. A majority of the Company’s directors must be persons who are not interested persons, as that term is defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. Additionally, the Company is required to provide and maintain a bond issued by a reputable fidelity insurance company to protect the BDC. Furthermore, as a BDC, the Company is prohibited from protecting any director or officer against any liability to the Company or its Unitholders arising from willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such person’s office.

As a BDC, the Company is required to meet an asset coverage ratio, reflecting the value of our total assets to our total senior securities, which include all of our borrowings and any preferred units we may issue in the future, of at least 150%. The Company may also be prohibited under the 1940 Act from knowingly participating in certain transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of directors who are not interested persons and, in some cases, prior approval by the SEC.

On June 13, 2017, SCP received an exemptive order that permits the Company to participate in negotiated co-investment transactions with certain affiliates, in a manner consistent with the Company’s investment objective, positions, policies, strategies and restrictions as well as regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors, and pursuant to various conditions (the “Order”). If the Company is unable to rely on the Order for a particular opportunity, such opportunity will be allocated first to the entity whose investment strategy is the most consistent with the opportunity being allocated, and second, if the terms of the opportunity are consistent with more than one entity’s investment strategy, on an alternating basis. Although the Adviser’s investment professionals will endeavor to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner, the Company and its Unitholders could be adversely affected to the extent investment opportunities are allocated among us and other investment vehicles managed or sponsored by, or affiliated with, our executive officers, directors and members of our investment adviser.

The Company is generally not able to issue and sell common units at a price below net asset value per unit without Unitholder approval. The Company may, however, sell common units, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common units, at a price below the then-current net asset value of our common units if the Board

20

determines that such sale is in the best interests of the Company and the Unitholders, and the Unitholders approve such sale.

The Company may be periodically examined by the SEC for compliance with the federal securities laws, including the 1940 Act.

Qualifying Assets

Under the 1940 Act, a BDC may not acquire any asset other than assets of the type listed in Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, which are referred to as qualifying assets, unless, at the time the acquisition is made, qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the BDC’s total assets. The principal categories of qualifying assets relevant to our business are the following:

21

Under Section 55(b) of the 1940 Act, the value of a BDC’s assets shall be determined as of the date of the most recent financial statements filed by such company with the SEC pursuant to Section 13 of the 1934 Act, and shall be determined no less frequently than annually.

Significant Managerial Assistance to Portfolio Companies

As a BDC, the Company offers, and must provide upon request, significant managerial assistance to its portfolio companies. This assistance could involve, among other things, monitoring the operations of portfolio companies, participating in board and management meetings, consulting with and advising officers of portfolio companies and providing other organizational and financial guidance. The Company may also receive fees for these services. The Administrative Coordinator provides such managerial assistance, if any, on the Company’s behalf to portfolio companies that request this assistance.

Temporary Investments

Pending investment in other types of “qualifying assets,” as described above, the Company’s investments may consist of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities or high-quality investment grade debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment, which we refer to, collectively, as temporary investments, so that 70% of the Company’s assets are qualifying assets. Typically, we will invest in U.S. Treasury bills or other short-term, U.S. government securities, including agencies, or in repurchase agreements, provided that such repurchase agreements are fully collateralized by cash or securities issued by the U.S. government or its agencies. A repurchase agreement involves the purchase by an investor, such as the Company, of a specified security and the simultaneous agreement by the seller to repurchase it at an agreed-upon future date and at a price which is greater than the purchase price by an amount that reflects an agreed-upon interest rate. There is no percentage restriction on the proportion of the Company’s assets that may be invested in such repurchase agreements. However, if more than 25% of the Company’s total assets constitute repurchase agreements from a single counterparty, the Company would not meet the diversification tests in order to qualify as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Thus, the Company does not intend to enter into repurchase agreements with a single counterparty in excess of this limit. The Adviser will monitor the creditworthiness of the counterparties with which we enter into repurchase agreement transactions.

Senior Securities

The Company is permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple classes of indebtedness and one class of units senior to common units if asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least equal to 150% immediately after each such issuance. In addition, while certain senior securities remain outstanding, the Company must make provisions to prohibit any distribution to Unitholders or the repurchase of such securities or units unless the Company meets the applicable asset coverage ratios at the time of the distribution or repurchase. The Company may also borrow amounts up to 5% of the value of total assets for temporary purposes without regard to asset coverage. The Company may borrow money, which would magnify the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and may increase the risk of investing in the Company.

Code of Ethics

The Company and the Adviser have each adopted a code of ethics pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act and Rule 204A-1 under the Advisers Act, respectively, that establish procedures for personal investments and restricts certain transactions by personnel. The codes of ethics generally do not permit investments by employees

22

in securities that may be purchased or held by the Company. Each code of ethics is available on the EDGAR database on the SEC’s Internet site at http://www.sec.gov. You may also obtain copies of the code of ethics, after paying a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following email address: publicinfo@sec.gov.

Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures

We have delegated our proxy voting responsibility to our investment adviser. A summary of the Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures of our adviser are set forth below. The guidelines are reviewed periodically by the Adviser and our non-interested directors, and, accordingly, are subject to change.

As an investment adviser registered under the Advisers Act, the Adviser has a fiduciary duty to act solely in the best interests of its clients. As part of this duty, it recognizes that it must vote securities held by its clients in a timely manner free of conflicts of interest. These policies and procedures for voting proxies for investment advisory clients are intended to comply with Section 206 of, and Rule 206(4)-6 under, the Advisers Act.

Our investment adviser votes proxies relating to our portfolio securities in the best interest of Unitholders. The Company reviews on a case-by-case basis each proposal submitted for a proxy vote to determine its impact on our investments. Although it generally votes against proposals that may have a negative impact on our investments, it may vote for such a proposal if there exists compelling long-term reasons to do so. The proxy voting decisions of our investment adviser are made by the senior investment professionals who are responsible for monitoring each of our investments. To ensure that our vote is not the product of a conflict of interest, it requires that: (i) anyone involved in the decision making process disclose to a managing member of the Company any potential conflict that he or she is aware of and any contact that he or she has had with any interested party regarding a proxy vote; and (ii) employees involved in the decision making process or vote administration are prohibited from revealing how we intend to vote on a proposal in order to reduce any attempted influence from interested parties.

You may obtain information about how we voted proxies by making a written request for proxy voting information to: SCP Private Credit Income BDC LLC, 500 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10022.

Privacy Policy

We are committed to maintaining the privacy of our unitholders and to safeguarding their non-public personal information. The following information is provided to help you understand what personal information we may have access to, how we protect that information and why, in certain cases, we may share such information with select other parties.

Generally, we do not receive any non-public personal information relating to our Unitholders, although certain non-public personal information of our Unitholders may become available to us. We do not disclose any non-public personal information about our Unitholders or former unitholders to anyone, except as permitted by law or as is necessary in order to service Unitholder accounts (for example, through a transfer agent or third party administrator).

We restrict access to non-public personal information about our Unitholders to employees of our investment adviser and its affiliates with a legitimate business need for the information. We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards designed to protect the non-public personal information of our Unitholders.

Reporting Obligations

We furnish our Unitholders with annual reports containing audited financial statements, quarterly reports, and such other periodic reports as we determine to be appropriate or as may be required by law. We are required to comply with all periodic reporting, proxy solicitation and other applicable requirements under the 1934 Act.

23

Unitholders and the public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC on the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov). We make available free of charge our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.

Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations

The following discussion is a general summary of certain U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to the Company and to an investment in Units. This discussion is based on the provisions of the Code and the regulations of the U.S. Department of Treasury promulgated thereunder, or “Treasury regulations,” each as in effect as of the date of this report.

These provisions are subject to differing interpretations and change by legislative or administrative action, and any change may be retroactive. This discussion does not constitute a detailed explanation of all U.S. federal income tax aspects affecting the Company and its Unitholders and does not purport to deal with the U.S. federal income tax consequences that may be important to particular Unitholders in light of their individual investment circumstances or to some types of Unitholders subject to special tax rules, such as financial institutions, broker dealers, insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations, persons holding Units in connection with a hedging, straddle, conversion or other integrated transaction, investors who are subject to the special tax accounting rules under Section 451(b) of the Code, Non-U.S. Unitholders (as defined below) engaged in a trade or business in the U.S., persons who have ceased to be U.S. citizens or to be taxed as resident aliens or individual Non-U.S. Unitholders present in the U.S. for 183 days or more during a taxable year. This discussion also does not address any aspects of U.S. estate or gift tax or foreign, state or local tax. This discussion assumes that Unitholders hold their Units as capital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes (generally, assets held for investment). No ruling has been or will be sought from the Internal Revenue Service, or “IRS,” regarding any matter discussed herein.

For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. Unitholder” is a beneficial owner of Units that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

For purposes of this discussion, a “Non-U.S. Unitholder” means a beneficial owner of Units that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes that is not a U.S. Unitholder or a partnership (or other entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

If a partnership (or other entity classified as a partnership, for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds Units, the treatment of the partnership and each partner for U.S. federal income tax purposes generally will depend on the status of the partner, the activities of the partnership and certain determinations made at the partner level. An investor considering an investment in a partnership that will invest in Units should consult the disclosure documents provided to such investor from such partnership in conjunction with this discussion to determine the applicability of this discussion to an indirect investment in Units through such partnership. In addition, such investor should consult its own tax advisers regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of interests in a partnership and of Units by such partnership in light of such partner’s particular circumstances.

24

Taxation of the Company

The Company elected to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code for 2018 and intends to qualify for taxation as a RIC annually. As a RIC, the Company generally will not pay corporate-level U.S. federal income taxes on any ordinary income or capital gains that it timely distributes to Unitholders as dividends.

To qualify as a RIC, the Company must, among other things:

As a RIC, the Company (but not its Unitholders) is generally not subject to U.S. federal income tax on investment company taxable income and net capital gains that it distributes to Unitholders in any taxable year with respect to which it distributes an amount equal to at least 90% of the sum of (i) investment company taxable income (which includes, among other items, dividends, interest and the excess of any net realized short-term capital gains over net realized long-term capital losses and other taxable income (other than any net capital gain), reduced by deductible expenses) determined without regard to the deduction for dividends and distributions paid and (ii) net tax-exempt interest income (which is the excess of gross tax-exempt interest income over certain disallowed deductions), or the “Annual Distribution Requirement.” The Company intends to distribute annually all or substantially all of such income. Generally, if the Company fails to meet this Annual Distribution Requirement for any taxable year, it will fail to qualify as a RIC for such taxable year. To the extent the Company meets the Annual Distribution Requirement for a taxable year, but retains net capital gains for investment or any investment company taxable income, it is subject to U.S. federal income tax on such retained capital gains and investment company taxable income. The Company may choose to retain net capital gains for investment or any investment company taxable income, and pay the associated corporate-level U.S. federal income tax, including the 4% U.S. federal excise tax described below.

The Company is subject to a nondeductible 4% U.S. federal excise tax on certain of its undistributed income, unless it timely distributes (or is deemed to have timely distributed) an amount equal to the sum of:

25

While the Company currently expects to distribute any income and capital gains in order to avoid the imposition of this 4% U.S. federal excise tax, it may not be successful in avoiding entirely the imposition of this tax. In that case, the Company will be liable for the tax only on the amount by which it does not meet the foregoing distribution requirement.

The Company is authorized to borrow funds and to sell assets in order to satisfy distribution requirements. However, under the 1940 Act, it is not permitted to make distributions to Unitholders while any senior securities are outstanding unless it meets the applicable asset coverage ratios. Moreover, the Company’s ability to dispose of assets or otherwise distribute amounts necessary to meet distribution requirements may be limited by (1) the illiquid nature of its portfolio, (2) other requirements relating to status as a RIC, including the Diversification Tests and/or (3) the limitations under one or more credit facilities. If the Company disposes of assets in order to meet the Annual Distribution Requirement or to avoid the 4% U.S. federal excise tax, it may make such dispositions at times that, from an investment standpoint, are not advantageous.

A RIC is limited in its ability to deduct expenses in excess of its “investment company taxable income” (which is, generally, ordinary income plus the excess of net short-term capital gains over net long-term capital losses). If the Company’s expenses in a given year exceed investment company taxable income, it would experience a net operating loss for that year. However, a RIC is not permitted to carry forward net operating losses to subsequent years. In addition, expenses can be used only to offset investment company taxable income, not net capital gain. Due to these limits on the deductibility of expenses, the Company may, for tax purposes, have aggregate taxable income for several years that it is required to distribute and that is taxable to Unitholders even if such income is greater than the aggregate net income the Company actually earned during those years. Such required distributions may be made from cash assets or by liquidation of investments, if necessary. The Company may realize gains or losses from such liquidations. In the event the Company realizes net capital gains from such transactions, Unitholders may receive a larger capital gain distribution than they would have received in the absence of such transactions.

Check-the-Box Election and Failure to be Taxed as a RIC

In connection with the intention to be taxed as a RIC, the Company filed a check-the-box election to be classified as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, while the Company has elected, and expects to qualify to be treated as a RIC annually, no assurance can be provided that it will qualify as a RIC for any taxable year. For example, the Company anticipates that it may have difficulty satisfying the Diversification Tests as it deploys capital and builds a portfolio. If the Company is subsequently unable to qualify for treatment as a RIC, and certain amelioration provisions are not applicable, it would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on all taxable income (including net capital gains) at regular corporate rates. The Company would not be able to deduct distributions to Unitholders, nor would they be required to be made. Distributions, including distributions of net long-term capital gain, would generally be taxable to Unitholders as ordinary dividend income to the extent of current and accumulated earnings and profits. Subject to certain limitations under the Code, corporate Unitholders would be eligible to claim a dividend received deduction with respect to such dividend; non-corporate Unitholders would generally be able to treat such dividends as “qualified dividend income,” which is subject to reduced rates of U.S. federal income tax. Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits would be treated first as a return of capital to the extent of the Unitholder’s tax basis, and any remaining distributions would be treated as a capital gain. If the Company subsequently fails to qualify as a RIC, in order to requalify as a RIC, in addition to the other requirements discussed above, the Company would be required to distribute all previously undistributed earnings attributable to the period it failed to qualify as a RIC by the end of the first year that it intends to requalify as a RIC. If the Company fails to requalify as a RIC for a period greater than two taxable years, it may be subject to regular corporate-level U.S. federal income tax on any net built-in gains with respect to certain assets (i.e., the excess of the aggregate gains, including items of income, over aggregate losses that would have been realized with respect to such assets if the Company had been liquidated) that it elects to recognize on requalification or when recognized over the next five years.

26

The remainder of this discussion assumes that the Company qualifies as a RIC for each taxable year.

Company Investments

Certain investment practices are subject to special and complex U.S. federal income tax provisions that may, among other things, (i) disallow, suspend or otherwise limit the allowance of certain losses or deductions, including the dividends received deduction, (ii) convert lower taxed long-term capital gains and qualified dividend income into higher taxed short-term capital gains or ordinary income, (iii) convert ordinary loss or a deduction into capital loss (the deductibility of which is more limited), (iv) causes the Company to recognize income or gain without a corresponding receipt of cash, (v) adversely affect the time as to when a purchase or sale of stock or securities is deemed to occur, (vi) adversely alter the characterization of certain complex financial transactions and (vii) produce income that will not qualify as good income for purposes of the 90% Gross Income Test. The Company monitors transactions and may make certain tax elections and may be required to borrow money or dispose of securities to mitigate the effect of these rules and to prevent disqualification as a RIC but there can be no assurance of success in this regard.

Taxable Subsidiaries. Some of the income and fees that the Company may recognize will not satisfy the 90% Gross Income Test. In order to ensure that such income and fees do not disqualify the Company from RIC tax treatment as a result of a failure to satisfy the 90% Gross Income Test, it may hold assets that generate such income and provide services that generate such fees indirectly through one or more entities treated as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Such corporations will be required to pay U.S. federal corporate income tax on their earnings, which ultimately will reduce the Company’s return on such income and fees.

Passive Foreign Investment Companies. If the Company purchases shares in a “passive foreign investment company,” or PFIC, it may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on a portion of any “excess distribution” or gain from the disposition of such shares even if such income is distributed as a taxable dividend by the Company to Unitholders. Certain elections are available under certain circumstances that may allow the Company to ameliorate the impact of this tax. Such elections, however, may require the Company to recognize in a year income in excess of our distributions from PFICs and proceeds from dispositions of PFIC stock during that year, and such income will nevertheless be subject to the Annual Distribution Requirement and will be taken into account for purposes of the 4% U.S. federal excise tax.

Debt Instruments. In certain circumstances, the Company may be required to recognize taxable income prior to the time at which it receives cash. For example, if the Company holds debt instruments that are treated under applicable tax rules as having OID (such as debt instruments with an end-of-term payment and/or PIK interest payment or, in certain cases, increasing interest rates or issued with warrants), it must include in taxable income each year a portion of the OID that accrues over the life of the obligation, regardless of whether cash representing such income is received in the same taxable year. Because any OID accrued will be included in investment company taxable income for the year of accrual, the Company may be required to make a distribution to Unitholders in order to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement and to avoid the 4% U.S. federal excise tax, even though it will not have received any corresponding cash amount.

Warrants. Gain or loss realized from the sale or exchange of warrants acquired as well as any loss attributable to the lapse of such warrants generally are treated as capital gain or loss. The treatment of such gain or loss as long-term or short-term generally depends on how long the Company held a particular warrant and on the nature of the disposition transaction.

Foreign Currency Transactions. Under the Code, gains or losses attributable to fluctuations in exchange rates which occur between the time the Company accrues income or other receivables or accrues expenses or other liabilities denominated in a foreign currency and the time the Company actually collects such receivables or pays such liabilities generally are treated as ordinary income or loss. Similarly, on disposition of debt instruments and

27

certain other instruments denominated in a foreign currency, gains or losses attributable to fluctuations if the value of the foreign currency between the date of acquisition of the instrument and the date of disposition also are treated as ordinary gain or loss. These currency fluctuations related gains and losses may increase or decrease the amount of investment company taxable income to be distributed to Unitholders as ordinary income.

General Tax Cooperation

The Company will provide Unitholders with certain information regarding the amount of each distribution by us characterized as a “return of capital distribution,” “interest-related dividend distribution,” “ordinary dividend distribution,” “short term capital gain distribution” or “long term capital gain distribution” for U.S. federal income tax purposes on an estimated basis in connection with such distribution and on a final basis not later than March 1st of the taxable year following the distribution. The Company and the Adviser shall use commercially reasonable efforts to provide Unitholders annually with any other tax information that the Company and the Adviser possess, or can reasonably obtain, reasonably requested by Unitholders in writing, concerning distributions by the Company or redemption of Units by the Company. The Company and the Adviser shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate with Unitholders by providing any additional tax information and/or assisting in the filing of additional tax forms relating to the Company, as reasonably requested by Unitholders.

Tax Proceedings

The Company shall promptly notify Unitholders in writing and provide a copy of any notice received from a U.S. federal, state or local taxing authority, if it is subject to any tax audit or other administrative or judicial proceeding relating to tax matters of the Company. The Unitholders shall have the right to participate at their own expense in any such audit or other proceedings, and we shall take into account and consider in good faith comments and suggestions of the Unitholders regarding such audits or proceedings. The Company shall promptly provide to the Unitholders copies of all material correspondence with any relevant tax authority regarding any audit, inquiry or other similar administrative proceeding in relation to the Company.

Reportable Transactions

The Company and the Adviser shall use reasonable best efforts to not knowingly cause the Company to engage directly or indirectly in a transaction that, as of the date the transaction is entered into by the Company, is a “listed transaction,” a “prohibited reportable transaction,” or a “subsequently listed transaction” (each as defined in Section 4695(e) of the Code).

Importance of Obtaining Professional Advice

The foregoing analysis is not intended as a substitute for careful tax planning. Accordingly, prospective investors in the Company are strongly urged to consult their tax advisors with specific reference to their own situations regarding the possible tax consequences of an investment in the Company.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

28

SUMMARY RISK FACTORS

General Risks Related to Investment Strategy

General Risks Related to the Company

29

Risks Related to RICs and BDCs

Regulatory Risks Relating to the Company

30

Other Risks Related to Portfolio Investments

RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED)

The purchase of Units involves a number of significant risks and other important factors relating to investments in business development companies generally, and relating to the strategy and investment objective of the Company in particular. An investment in the Company is a potentially suitable investment only for a sophisticated investor for whom such an investment does not represent a complete investment program and who, in consultation with its investment and tax advisors, fully understands and is capable of assuming the risks of an investment in the Company.

The Company holds certain investments and conducts certain activities through investing in wholly-owned SPVs. All references to investments by the Company in this annual report on Form 10-K refer, as the context requires, to investments by either the Company or those SPVs.

There can be no assurance that the Company will achieve its investment objective, that the Company will not lose capital, that the Adviser’s judgment will result in profitable investments by the Company or that the Adviser will successfully be able to implement the Company’s investment strategy. An investment in the Company involves investment considerations and risk factors that prospective investors should consider before subscribing. No guarantee or representation is made that the Company’s investments will succeed.

Certain of the characteristics and risks of the portfolio instruments and investment, hedging, financing and disposition techniques that the Adviser may utilize in managing the Company are set forth below. This is not intended to be a complete description or enumeration of portfolio instruments, investment, hedging, financing or disposition techniques or risks.

The Company’s ability to achieve its investment objective may be affected by, among other things, the factors described below. The Company may also invest in instruments or engage in investment, hedging, financing or

31

disposition techniques other than those described below, including instruments or investment, hedging, financing or disposition techniques that are not in existence as of the date of this annual report on Form 10-K. Consistent with its investment strategy, the Company may invest in instruments and engage in investment, hedging, financing or disposition techniques of any and all types, which exist now or are hereafter created.

The discussion below, to the extent it relates to bankruptcy law or proceedings or to debtors’ and creditors’ rights, is based upon principles of U.S. federal and state laws. Insofar as the Company’s portfolio investments (the Company’s investments are referred to herein as “Portfolio Investments”), include obligations of non-U.S. issuers, or bankruptcy, reorganization or similar proceedings in a country other than the U.S., the laws of such other countries, and the rights and obligations of debtors and creditors in such other countries, under factual circumstances similar to those described below, may or may not be analogous to those described below.

General Risks Related to Investment Strategy

Senior Secured Loans. With respect to the Company’s investments in senior secured loans (including first lien and stretch senior loans), the Company will generally have a security interest in assets of the company, which should mitigate the risk that the Company will not be repaid. However, the collateral securing the Company’s loans may decrease in value over time, may be difficult to sell in a timely manner, may be difficult to appraise, and may fluctuate in value based upon the success of the business and market conditions, including as a result of the inability of the company to raise additional capital. In some circumstances, the Company’s lien could be subordinated to claims of other creditors. In addition, deterioration in a company’s financial condition and prospects, including its inability to raise additional capital, may be accompanied by deterioration in the value of the collateral for the loan. Consequently, the fact that a loan is secured does not guarantee that the Company will receive principal and interest payments according to the loan’s terms, or at all, or that the Company will be able to collect on the loan should it be forced to enforce its remedies. Furthermore, if a secured loan is foreclosed, the Company could own the underlying collateral (e.g., real estate), and would be subject to the risks, costs and liabilities associated with owning and disposing of the collateral.

Subordinated Loans. The Company may invest in subordinated loans. In the event of a loss of value of the underlying assets that collateralize the loans, the subordinate portions of the loans may suffer a loss prior to the more senior portions suffering a loss. If a borrower defaults and lacks sufficient assets to satisfy the Company’s loan, the Company may suffer a loss of principal or interest. If a borrower declares bankruptcy, the Company may not have full recourse to the assets of the borrower, or the assets of the borrower may not be sufficient to satisfy the loan. In addition, certain of the Company’s loans may be subordinate to other debt of the borrower. As a result, if a borrower defaults on the Company’s loan or on debt senior to the Company’s loan, or in the event of the bankruptcy of a borrower, the Company’s loan will be satisfied only after all senior debt is paid in full. The Company’s ability to amend the terms of the Company’s loans, assign the Company’s loans, accept prepayments, exercise the Company’s remedies (through “standstill periods”) and control decisions made in bankruptcy proceedings relating to borrowers may be limited by intercreditor arrangements if debt senior to the Company’s loans exists. In addition, the Company will be subject to the potential risks of foreclosure and ownership of underlying collateral described in “ —Senior Secured Loans” above.

Mezzanine Securities. The Company may invest in unsecured securities that are senior to common stock or other equity securities (“Mezzanine Securities”). Mezzanine Securities are subordinated to substantial amounts of senior debt, all or a portion of which may be secured. As a result, holders of Mezzanine Securities are generally not entitled to receive any payments in bankruptcy or liquidation until senior creditors are paid in full. In addition, the legal remedies available to holders of Mezzanine Securities are normally limited by restrictions benefiting senior creditors. In the event a company in which the Company holds Mezzanine Securities cannot generate adequate cash flow to meet senior debt service, the Company may suffer a partial or total loss of capital invested. Because issuers of Mezzanine Securities are often highly leveraged, their relatively high debt-to-equity ratios create increased risks that their operations will not be able to generate adequate cash flow to meet senior debt service.

32

Unsecured Loans or Debt. The Company may invest in unsecured loans which are not secured by collateral. In the event of default on an unsecured loan, the first priority lien holder has first claim to the underlying collateral of the loan. It is possible that no collateral value would remain for an unsecured holder and therefore result in a loss of investment to the Company. Because unsecured loans are lower in priority of payment to secured loans, they are subject to the additional risk that the cash flow of the borrower may be insufficient to meet scheduled payments after giving effect to the secured obligations of the borrower. Unsecured loans generally have greater price volatility than secured loans and may be less liquid.

Prepayment Risk. The terms of loans in which the Company invests may permit borrowers to voluntarily prepay loans at any time, either with no or a nominal prepayment premium. This prepayment right could result in the borrower repaying the principal on an obligation held by the Company earlier than expected. This may happen when there is a decline in interest rates, when the borrower’s improved credit or operating or financial performance allows the refinancing of certain classes of debt with lower cost debt. The yield of the Company’s investment assets may be affected by the rate of prepayments differing from the Adviser’s expectations.

Investment Modification Risk. The terms and conditions of loan agreements and related assignments may be amended, modified or waived only by the agreement of the lenders. Generally, any such agreement must include a majority or a super majority (measured by outstanding loans or commitments) or, in certain circumstances, a unanimous vote of the lenders. Consequently, the terms and conditions of the payment obligation arising from Portfolio Investments could be modified, amended or waived in a manner contrary to the preferences of the Company if a sufficient number of the other lenders concurred with such modification, amendment or waiver. There can be no assurance that any obligations arising from a Portfolio Investment will maintain the terms and conditions to which the Company originally agreed.

Collateral Risk. The collateral and security arrangements in relation to such secured obligations as the Company may invest in will be subject to such security or collateral having been correctly created and perfected and any applicable legal or regulatory requirements which may restrict the giving of collateral or security by an obligor, such as, for example, thin capitalization, over-indebtedness, financial assistance and corporate benefit requirements. If one or more Portfolio Investments do not benefit from the expected collateral or security arrangements, this may adversely affect the value of or, in the event of default, the recovery of principal or interest from such Portfolio Investments made by the Company. Accordingly, any such failure to properly create or perfect collateral and security interests attaching to the Portfolio Investments could have a material adverse effect on the performance of the Company, and, by extension, the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and the value of the Units. A component of the Adviser’s analysis of the desirability of making a given investment relates to the estimated residual or recovery value of such Portfolio Investments in the event of the insolvency of the obligor. This residual or recovery value will be driven primarily by the value of the anticipated future cash flows of the obligor’s business and by the value of any underlying assets constituting the collateral for such Portfolio Investment. The anticipated future cash flows of the obligor’s business and the value of collateral can, however, be extremely difficult to predict as in certain circumstances market quotations and third-party pricing information may not be available. If the recovery value of the collateral associated with the Portfolio Investments in which the Company invests decreases or is materially worse than expected by the Company, such a decrease or deficiency may affect the value of the Portfolio Investments made by the Company. Accordingly, there may be a material adverse effect on the performance of the Company, and, by extension, the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and the value of the Units.

Defaults. The Company may make investments in loans, or securities backed by loans, that may be at the time of their acquisition, or may become after acquisition, non-performing loans. In the event of any default under a loan directly held by the Company or a loan underlying a security held by the Company, the Company will bear a risk of loss of principal to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the collateral and the principal and accrued interest of the loan, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s cash flow from operations. Other non-performing loans may require workout negotiations and/or restructuring, which may entail, among other things, a substantial reduction in the interest rate and/or a substantial write-down of the original

33

principal amount of such loans. Further, even if a restructuring were successfully accomplished, unless the restructuring provided for full amortization on or prior to maturity and the borrower strictly complied with that restructuring, a risk exists that upon maturity of such loans, replacement financing will not be available and such loans may not be repaid. In the event of the bankruptcy of a borrower, the loan to that borrower will be deemed to be secured only to the extent of the value of the underlying collateral at the time of bankruptcy (as determined by the bankruptcy court), the lien securing the loan will be subject to the avoidance powers of the bankruptcy trustee or debtor-in-possession to the extent the lien is unenforceable under state law, and realizing any value under such circumstances can be an expensive and lengthy process that could have a substantial negative effect on the anticipated return on the loan and on the security backed by such loan. Other risks attendant to a bankruptcy filing are described below. The foregoing statement does not apply in the context of a borrower insolvency case commenced under chapter 13 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code where the underlying collateral is used as the principal residence of the borrower, but in such instances, the lender will nonetheless be stayed from the collection of its claim, taking possession of the collateral, and enforcing its lien unless and until the lender obtains relief from the automatic stay under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

Litigation and Related Risks Associated with Origination and Servicing. Loan origination and servicing companies are routinely involved in legal proceedings concerning matters that arise in the ordinary course of their business. These legal proceedings range from actions involving a single plaintiff to class action lawsuits with potentially tens of thousands of class members. In addition, a number of participants in the loan origination and servicing industry (including control persons of industry participants) have been the subject of regulatory actions by state regulators, including state Attorneys General, and by the federal government. Governmental investigations, examinations or regulatory actions, or private lawsuits, including purported class action lawsuits, may adversely affect such companies’ financial results. To the extent the Company seeks to engage in origination and/or servicing directly, or has a financial interest in, or is otherwise affiliated with, an origination or servicing company, the Company will be subject to enhanced risks of litigation, regulatory actions and other proceedings. As a result, the Company may be required to pay legal fees, settlement costs, damages, penalties or other charges, any or all of which could materially adversely affect the Company and its investments.

Ability to Originate Loans on Advantageous Terms; Competition and Supply. The Company’s success depends, in part, on the ability of the Company or its affiliates to originate loans on advantageous terms. In originating and purchasing loans, the Company or its affiliates will compete with a broad spectrum of lenders. Increased competition for, or a diminishment in the available supply of, qualifying loans could result in lower yields on such loans, which could reduce returns (if any) to investors. The Company intends to originate certain investments and later offer to syndicate all or a portion of one or more investments to certain other funds or accounts managed by the Adviser and its affiliates, in each case subject to their own investment-review process, and to co-investors and/or third parties. Prior to such syndication, or if such syndication is not successful, the Company’s exposure to the originated investment may exceed the exposure that the Company intends to have over the long-term or would have had if it had purchased such investment in the secondary market rather than originating it. Where syndication is not successful, the Company may elect to sell all or a portion of an originated investment at a loss in order to rebalance the Company’s portfolio. The level of analytical sophistication, both financial and legal, necessary for successful financing to companies, particularly companies experiencing significant business and financial difficulties is unusually high. There is no assurance that the Adviser will correctly evaluate the value of the assets collateralizing the Company loans or the prospects for successful repayment or a successful reorganization or similar action.

Risks Associated with Originating Loans to Companies in Distressed Situations. As part of their lending activities, the Company or its affiliates may originate loans to companies that are experiencing significant financial or business difficulties, including companies involved in bankruptcy or other reorganization and liquidation proceedings. Although the terms of such financing may result in significant financial returns to the Company, they involve a substantial degree of risk. The level of analytical sophistication, both financial and legal, necessary for successful financing to companies experiencing significant business and financial difficulties is unusually high. There is no assurance that the Company will correctly evaluate the value of the assets

34

collateralizing the Company’s loans or the prospects for a successful reorganization or similar action. In any reorganization or liquidation proceeding relating to a company that the Company funds, the Company may lose all or part of the amounts advanced to the borrower or may be required to accept collateral with a value less than the amount of the loan advanced by the Company or its affiliates to the borrower.

Risks Relating to Bank Loans and Corporate Loans. Bank loans and corporate loans (which the Company will originate, invest in or otherwise gain exposure to) may not be readily marketable and may be subject to restrictions on resale. In some cases, negotiations involved in disposing of indebtedness may require weeks to complete. Consequently, some indebtedness may be difficult or impossible to dispose of readily at what the Adviser believes to be a fair price. In addition, bank loans and corporate loans are often less liquid than other types of debt securities, particularly in times of significant market dislocation. Loans to small and middle market entities (“SMEs”) may involve certain heightened risks. See “—Investments in Smaller and Middle Market Companies” below.

Holders of bank loans, corporate loans and other forms of direct indebtedness depend primarily upon the creditworthiness of the corporate or other borrower for payment of principal and interest. If the Company does not receive scheduled interest or principal payments on such indebtedness, the value of the Company’s investments could be adversely affected. The Company may invest in secured and unsecured bank loans and corporate loans. Bank loans and corporate loans that are fully secured may offer the Company more protection than an unsecured loan in the event of non-payment of scheduled interest or principal. However, there is no assurance that the liquidation of any collateral from a secured bank loan or corporate loan would satisfy the borrower’s obligation, or that such collateral could be liquidated. In the event of the bankruptcy of a borrower, the Company could experience delays or limitations in its ability to realize the benefits of any collateral securing a loan and could be compelled to accept new instruments or interests in respect of its claims under the bank loan in a plan of reorganization. These new instruments or interests may be on terms different from prevailing market terms for similar instruments and interests.

Bank loans usually require, in addition to scheduled payments of interest and principal, the prepayment of the bank loan from free cash flow. The degree to which borrowers prepay bank loans, whether as a contractual requirement or at their election, may be affected by general business conditions, the financial condition of the borrower and competitive conditions among lenders, among others. As such, prepayments cannot be predicted with accuracy. Upon a prepayment, either in part or in full, the actual outstanding debt on which the Company derives interest income will be reduced. The effect of prepayments on the Company’s performance may or may not be mitigated by the receipt of prepayment fees and/or the Company’s reinvestment of prepayments in other bank loans that have similar or identical yields.

The Company may purchase “assignments” of bank loans from lenders. The purchaser of an assignment typically succeeds to all the rights and obligations under the loan agreement with the same rights and obligations as the assigning lender. Assignments may, however, be arranged through private negotiations between potential assignees and potential assignors, and the rights and obligations acquired by the purchaser of an assignment may differ from, and be more limited than, those held by the assigning lender.

The Company may also invest in “participations” in bank loans. Participations by the Company in a lender’s portion of a bank loan typically will result in the Company having a contractual relationship only with such lender, not with the borrower. As a result, the Company may have the right to receive payments of principal, interest and any fees to which it is entitled only from the lender selling the participation and only upon receipt by such lender of such payments from the borrower. In connection with purchasing participations, the Company generally will have no right to enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement, nor any rights with respect to any funds acquired by other lenders through set-off against the borrower, and the Company may not directly benefit from any collateral supporting the bank loan in which it has purchased the participation. As a result, the Company assumes the credit risk of both the borrower and the lender selling the participation.

35

In many cases bank loans and loan participations would not be deemed to be securities for purposes of U.S. federal and/or state securities laws. As a result, an investment in bank loans would not be afforded the same protections as an investment in securities, such as the extensive disclosure requirements under U.S. federal and/or state securities laws, which may adversely impact the Company’s ability to seek recourse in respect of such investments. Similarly, the documentation evidencing bank loans and loan participations will not necessarily be maintained with the Company’s custodian.

Investments in Life Science Industry. Various segments of the life science industry are (or may become) (i) highly regulated at both the federal and state levels in the U.S. and internationally, (ii) subject to frequent regulatory change and (iii) dependent upon various government or private insurance reimbursement programs. While the Company may make investments in companies that comply with relevant laws and regulations, certain aspects of their operations may not have been subject to judicial or regulatory interpretation. An adverse review or determination by any one of such authorities, or an adverse change in the regulatory requirements or reimbursement programs, could have a material adverse effect on the operations of the companies in which the Company invests. Recent legislative changes have had, and will likely continue to have, a significant impact on the life science industry. In addition, various legislative proposals related to the life science industry are introduced from time to time at the U.S. federal and state level, and any such proposals, if adopted, could have a significant impact on the life science industry.

The life science industry spends heavily on research and development and in relatively new technologies. Research findings and technological innovation (together with patent expirations) may make any particular treatment, service or product less attractive if previously unknown or underappreciated risks are revealed, or if a more effective, less costly or less risky solution is or becomes available. Certain new technologies are more costly and time-consuming to reach viability and such companies may have difficulty establishing a market presence. Developing technologies are also more likely to have undeveloped regulatory frameworks and therefore there is a greater risk that regulatory developments may adversely affect the industry. Any such development could have a material adverse effect on the companies in which the Company invests.

General Economic and Market Risk. The value of the Company’s investments could be affected by factors affecting the economy and securities markets generally, such as real or perceived adverse economic conditions, supply and demand for particular instruments, changes in the general outlook for certain markets or corporate earnings, interest rates, announcements of political information or adverse investor sentiment generally. The market values of the Company’s investments may decline for a number of reasons, including increases in defaults resulting from changes in overall economic conditions and widening of credit spreads. Unfavorable market conditions may also increase funding costs, limit access to the capital markets or result in credit terms changing or credit becoming unavailable. These events could have an adverse effect on the Company’s investments and the Company’s overall performance.

In 2010, a financial crisis emerged in Europe, triggered by high budget deficits and rising direct and contingent sovereign debt, which created concerns about the ability of certain nations to continue to service their sovereign debt obligations. Risks resulting from such debt crisis, including any austerity measures taken in exchange for bailout of certain nations, and any future debt crisis in Europe or any similar crisis elsewhere could have a detrimental impact on the global economic recovery, sovereign and non-sovereign debt in certain countries and the financial condition of financial institutions generally. On January 31, 2020, the United Kingdom (the “UK”) ended its membership in the European Union (“Brexit”). Under the terms of the withdrawal agreement negotiated and agreed between the UK and the European Union, the UK’s departure from the European Union was followed by a transition period (the “Transition Period”), which ran until December 31, 2020 and during which the UK continued to apply European Union law and was treated for all material purposes as if it were still a member of the European Union. On December 24, 2020, the European Union and UK governments signed a trade deal that became provisionally effective on January 1, 2021 and that now governs the relationship between the UK and European Union (the “Trade Agreement”). The Trade Agreement implements significant regulation around trade, transport of goods and travel restrictions between the UK and the European Union.

36

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the longer term economic, legal, political and social implications of Brexit are unclear at this stage and are likely to continue to lead to ongoing political and economic uncertainty and periods of increased volatility in both the UK and in wider European markets for some time. In particular, Brexit could lead to calls for similar referendums in other European jurisdictions, which could cause increased economic volatility in the European and global markets. This mid- to long-term uncertainty could have adverse effects on the economy generally and on our ability to earn attractive returns. In particular, currency volatility could mean that our returns are adversely affected by market movements and could make it more difficult, or more expensive, for us to execute prudent currency hedging policies. Potential decline in the value of the British Pound and/or the Euro against other currencies, along with the potential further downgrading of the UK’s sovereign credit rating, could also have an impact on the performance of certain investments made in the UK or Europe.

Events such as war, terrorism and related geopolitical risks have led, and may in the future lead, to increased short-term market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects on U.S. and world economies and markets generally. Those events could also have an acute effect on individual issuers or related groups of issuers. These risks could also adversely affect individual issuers and securities markets, interest rates, auctions, secondary trading, ratings, credit risk, inflation, deflation and other factors relating to the Company’s investments.

Continuing market uncertainty may have a significant impact on the business of the Company. Among other things, the level of investment opportunities may decline from the Adviser’s current expectations. One possible consequence is that the Company may take a longer than anticipated period to invest capital and/or the Company may be relatively concentrated in a limited number of investments. Consequently, during this period, the returns (if any) realized by Unitholders may be substantially adversely affected by the unfavorable performance of a small number of these investments. Furthermore, market conditions may unfavorably impact the Company’s ability to secure leverage on terms as favorable as more established borrowers in the market, or to obtain any leverage on commercially favorable terms. To the extent the Company is able to secure financing for investments, increases in interest rates or in the risk spread demanded by financing sources would make the use of leverage more expensive and could limit the Company’s ability to structure and consummate its investments. Although the Adviser believes that recent market dislocations will result in attractive investment opportunities, the Company may not be able to time the acquisition or disposition of its investments correctly, which could result in further depreciation in values.

Public Health Crises Risk. Periods of market volatility have occurred and could continue to occur in response to pandemics or other events outside of the Company’s control. These types of events have adversely affected and could continue to adversely affect operating results for the Company and for the Company’s prospective portfolio companies. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic has delivered a shock to the global economy. This outbreak has led and for an unknown period of time will continue to lead to disruptions in local, regional, national and global markets and economies affected thereby, including a recession and a steep increase in unemployment in the United States. With respect to the U.S. credit markets (in particular for middle market loans), this outbreak has resulted in, and until fully resolved is likely to continue to result in, the following among other things: (i) government imposition of various forms of shelter-in-place orders and the closing of “non-essential” businesses, resulting in significant disruption to the businesses of many middle-market loan borrowers including supply chains, demand and practical aspects of their operations, as well as in lay-offs of employees, and, while these effects are hoped to be temporary, some effects could be persistent or even permanent; (ii) increased draws by borrowers on revolving lines of credit; (iii) increased requests by borrowers for amendments and waivers of their credit agreements to avoid default, increased defaults by such borrowers and/or increased difficulty in obtaining refinancing at the maturity dates of their loans; (iv) volatility and disruption of these markets including greater volatility in pricing and spreads and difficulty in valuing loans during periods of increased volatility, and liquidity issues; and (v) rapidly evolving proposals and/or actions by state and federal governments to address problems being experienced by the markets and by businesses and the economy in general which will not necessarily adequately address the problems facing the loan market and middle market businesses.

37

While several countries, as well as certain states, counties and cities in the United States, have relaxed initial public health restrictions with the view to partially or fully reopening their economies, many cities have since experienced a surge in the reported number of cases, hospitalizations and deaths related to the COVID-19 pandemic. These surges have led to the re-introduction of such restrictions and business shutdowns in certain states in the United States and globally and could continue to lead to the re-introduction of such restrictions elsewhere. Health advisors warn that recurring COVID-19 outbreaks will continue if reopening is pursued too soon or in the wrong manner, which may lead to the re-introduction or continuation of certain public health restrictions (such as instituting quarantines, prohibitions on travel and the closure of offices, businesses, schools, retail stores and other public venues). Additionally, as of late December 2020, travelers from the United States are not allowed to visit Canada, Australia or the majority of countries in Europe, Asia, Africa and South America. These continued travel restrictions may prolong the global economic downturn. In addition, although the Federal Food and Drug Administration authorized vaccines produced by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna for emergency use starting in December 2020, it remains unclear how quickly the vaccines will be distributed nationwide and globally or when “herd immunity” will be achieved and the restrictions that were imposed to slow the spread of the virus will be lifted entirely. The delay in distributing the vaccines could lead people to continue to self-isolate and not participate in the economy at pre-pandemic levels for a prolonged period of time. Even after the COVID-19 pandemic subsides, the U.S. economy and most other major global economies may continue to experience a recession, and we anticipate our business and operations could be materially adversely affected by a prolonged recession in the United States and other major markets.

This outbreak is having, and any future outbreaks could have, an adverse impact on the markets and the economy in general, which could have a material adverse impact on, among other things, the ability of lenders to originate loans, the volume and type of loans originated, and the volume and type of amendments and waivers granted to borrowers and remedial actions taken in the event of a borrower default, each of which could negatively impact the amount and quality of loans available for investment by the Company and returns to the Company, among other things. As of the date of this annual report on Form 10-K, it is impossible to determine the scope of this outbreak, or any future outbreaks, how long any such outbreak, market disruption or uncertainties may last, the effect any governmental actions will have or the full potential impact on the Company and its prospective portfolio companies. Any potential impact to the Company’s results of operations will depend to a large extent on future developments and new information that could emerge regarding the duration and severity of COVID-19 and the actions taken by authorities and other entities to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact, all of which are beyond our control.

If the economy is unable to substantially reopen, and high levels of unemployment continue for an extended period of time, loan delinquencies, loan non-accruals, problem assets, and bankruptcies may increase. In addition, collateral for our loans may decline in value, which could cause loan losses to increase and the net worth and liquidity of loan guarantors could decline, impairing their ability to honor commitments to the Company. An increase in loan delinquencies and non-accruals or a decrease in loan collateral and guarantor net worth could result in increased costs and reduced income which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations. Additionally, oil prices collapsed to an 18-year low on supply glut concerns, as shutdowns across the global economy sharply reduced oil demand while Saudi Arabia and Russia engaged in a price war. Central banks and governments have responded with liquidity injections to ease the strain on financial systems and stimulus measures to buffer the shock to businesses and consumers. These measures have helped stabilize certain portions of the financial markets over the short term, but volatility will likely remain elevated until the health crisis itself is under control (via fewer new cases, lower infection rates and/or verified treatments). There are still many unknowns and new information is incoming daily, compounding the difficulty of modeling outcomes for epidemiologists and economists alike.

The Company cannot be certain as to the duration or magnitude of the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the markets in which the Company and its portfolio companies operate, including with respect to travel restrictions, business closures, mitigation efforts (whether voluntary, suggested, or mandated by law) and corresponding declines in economic activity that may negatively impact the U.S. economy and the markets for

38

the various types of goods and services provided by U.S. middle market companies. Depending on the duration, magnitude and severity of these conditions and their related economic and market impacts, certain portfolio companies may suffer declines in earnings and could experience financial distress, which could cause them to default on their financial obligations to us and their other lenders.

The Company will also be negatively affected if the operations and effectiveness of the Company or a portfolio company (or any of the key personnel or service providers of the foregoing) is compromised or if necessary or beneficial systems and processes are disrupted.

Any public health emergency, including the COVID-19 pandemic or any outbreak of other existing or new epidemic diseases, or the threat thereof, and the resulting financial and economic market uncertainty could have a significant adverse impact on the Company and the fair value of the Company’s investments. These potential impacts, while uncertain, could adversely affect the Company’s and its portfolio companies’ operating results.

Capital Markets Uncertainty. The U.S. capital markets have experienced extreme volatility and disruption following the global outbreak of COVID-19 that began in December 2019. The global impact of the outbreak is rapidly evolving, and many countries have reacted by instituting quarantines, prohibitions on travel and the closure of offices, businesses, schools, retail stores and other public venues. Businesses are also implementing similar precautionary measures. Such measures, as well as the general uncertainty surrounding the dangers and impact of COVID-19, have created significant disruption in supply chains and economic activity. The impact of COVID-19 has led to significant volatility and declines in the global public equity markets and it is uncertain how long this volatility will continue. As COVID-19 continues to spread, the potential impacts, including a global, regional or other economic recession, are increasingly uncertain and difficult to assess. Some economists and major investment banks have expressed concern that the continued spread of the virus globally could lead to a world-wide economic downturn.

General uncertainty surrounding the dangers and impact of COVID-19 (including the preventative measures taken in response thereto and additional uncertainty regarding new variants of COVID-19 that have emerged in the U.K, South Africa and Brazil) has to date created significant disruption in supply chains and economic activity. Disruptions in the capital markets caused by the COVID-19 pandemic have increased the spread between the yields realized on risk-free and higher risk securities, resulting in illiquidity in parts of the capital markets. These and future market disruptions and/or illiquidity would be expected to have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Unfavorable economic conditions also would be expected to increase the Company’s funding costs, limit the Company’s access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to the Company. These events have limited and could continue to limit the Company’s investment originations, limit the Company’s ability to grow and have a material negative impact on the Company’s operating results and the fair values of its debt and equity investments.

In addition, due to the outbreak in the United States, certain personnel of the Adviser are currently working remotely, which may introduce additional operational risk to us. Staff members of certain of our other service providers may also work remotely during the COVID-19 outbreak. An extended period of remote working could lead to service limitations or failures that could impact the Company or its performance.

Further, current market conditions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic may make it difficult for the Company to obtain debt capital on favorable terms and any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. The debt capital that will be available to the Company in the future, if at all, may be at a higher cost and on less favorable terms and conditions than what the Company would otherwise expect, including being at a higher cost in rising rate environments. If the Company is unable to raise debt, then its equity investors may not benefit from the potential for increased returns on equity resulting from leverage and the Company may be limited in its ability to make or fund commitments to portfolio companies. An inability to obtain indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

39

Inability to Secure Debt Financing. In past economic downturns, such as the financial crisis in the United States that began in mid-2007 and during other times of extreme market volatility, many commercial banks and other financial institutions stopped lending or significantly curtailed their lending activity. In addition, in an effort to stem losses and reduce their exposure to segments of the economy deemed to be high risk, some financial institutions limited routine refinancing and loan modification transactions and even reviewed the terms of existing facilities to identify bases for accelerating the maturity of existing lending facilities. If these conditions recur, for example as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, it may be difficult for us to obtain desired financing to finance the growth of our investments on acceptable economic terms, or at all.

So far, the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in, and until fully resolved is likely to continue to result in, among other things, increased draws by borrowers on revolving lines of credit and increased requests by borrowers for amendments, modifications and waivers of their credit agreements to avoid default or change payment terms, increased defaults by such borrowers and/or increased difficulty in obtaining refinancing at the maturity dates of their loans. In addition, the duration and effectiveness of responsive measures implemented by governments and central banks cannot be predicted. The commencement, continuation, or cessation of government and central bank policies and economic stimulus programs, including changes in monetary policy involving interest rate adjustments or governmental policies, may contribute to the development of or result in an increase in market volatility, illiquidity and other adverse effects that could negatively impact the credit markets and the Company.

If we are unable to consummate credit facilities on commercially reasonable terms, our liquidity may be reduced significantly. If we are unable to repay amounts outstanding under any facility we may enter into and are declared in default or are unable to renew or refinance any such facility, it would limit our ability to initiate significant originations or to operate our business in the normal course. These situations may arise due to circumstances that we may be unable to control, such as inaccessibility of the credit markets, a severe decline in the value of the U.S. dollar, a further economic downturn or an operational problem that affects third parties or us, and could materially damage our business. Moreover, we are unable to predict when economic and market conditions may become more favorable. Even if such conditions improve broadly and significantly over the long term, adverse conditions in particular sectors of the financial markets could adversely impact our business.

General Credit Risk. The Company is subject to significant credit risk (i.e., the risk that an issuer or borrower will default in the payment of principal and/or interest on an instrument) in light of its investment strategy. Credit risk also includes the risk that a counterparty to a derivatives transaction (e.g., a swap counterparty) will be unwilling or unable to meet its obligations (see “—Counterparty Risk” below). Financial strength and solvency of an issuer or borrower are the primary factors influencing credit risk. In addition, degree of subordination, lack or inadequacy of collateral or credit enhancement for a debt instrument may affect its credit risk. Investments in stressed or distressed companies inherently have more credit risk than do similar investments in other companies. The degree of credit risk associated with any particular Portfolio Investment or any collateral relating thereto may be difficult or impossible for the Adviser to determine within reasonable standards of predictability. The Adviser also expects to utilize various third parties that hold Company assets (such as the Custodian and prime brokers) in implementing the Company’s investment strategy, and the Company will therefore also be subject to credit risk with respect to such entities.

Although most of the Company’s investments will not be rated by any credit rating agency, in some cases, the credit risk of some of the Company’s Portfolio Investments may be broadly gauged by the credit ratings of such Portfolio Investments. However, ratings are only the opinions of the agencies issuing them, may change less quickly than relevant circumstances, are not absolute guarantees of the quality of the rated securities and are subject to downgrade. Credit ratings and ratings agencies have recently been criticized for ratings which did not fully reflect the risks of certain securities or which did not reflect such risks in a timely manner. For most investments, however, the Adviser will rely on its own independent analysis of the credit quality and risks associated with individual securities considered for the Company, rather than relying on ratings agencies or third-party research. Therefore, the Adviser’s capabilities in analyzing credit quality and associated risks will be particularly important (especially since it is currently anticipated that most of the Company’s assets will not be

40

rated by a ratings agency or will be rated below investment grade), and there can be no assurance that the Adviser will be successful in this regard. See also “—Risks Related to Stressed and Distressed Investments” and “—High Yield Debt and Unrated Securities” below.

General Leverage Risks. The Company expects to employ leverage and otherwise incur indebtedness with respect to the portfolio both on a recourse or non-recourse basis (including through guarantees, derivatives, forward commitments and reverse repurchase agreements). The Company is not required to take any action (including unwinding or liquidating any position) in the event that such guideline is exceeded subsequent to the borrowing date, whether in the event of changes in the market value of the Company’s portfolio or otherwise. Prospective investors in the Company should expect that the effective leverage utilized by the Company may exceed such guideline, which only applies to direct borrowings; for instance, economic leverage inherent in the Company’s derivatives transactions and other investments will not be counted for purposes of such guideline, notwithstanding that such investments will be subject to many of the leverage-related risks described herein. In addition, determinations relating to leverage are inherently subjective and will involve the exercise of discretion by the Adviser (for instance, the Adviser may deem the amount of the Company’s direct borrowings to be reduced by cash and cash equivalents held by the Company or by a counterparty). See “—Leveraged Companies” below.

The use of leverage has the potential to magnify the gains or the losses on investments and to make the Company’s returns more volatile. Moreover, if the Company is required to de-lever as a result of changing market conditions or otherwise, it may be forced to sell Portfolio Investments at inopportune times or at disadvantageous prices. On the other hand, while the Company will have the flexibility to use leverage, there can be no guarantee that leverage can be obtained, or obtained on terms and pricing the Adviser finds attractive, especially in the current market environment. As a result, prospective investors in the Company should recognize that Portfolio Investments may not be leveraged, or may be leveraged at an amount below any leverage level otherwise expected by the Adviser. Moreover, even if leverage can be arranged, the Company is not obligated to utilize such leverage and may do so at the sole discretion of the Adviser. Should leverage not be obtained or utilized by the Company, the returns for the Company may be lower than they would have been had such leverage been obtained and utilized.

In connection with any leverage utilized by the Company, the Company may secure its obligations with respect thereto with any and all of its assets, including its right to receive capital contributions from the Unitholders, pursuant to a pledge or other security agreement on terms that the Company determines are fair and reasonable to the Company. If the Company were to default on its obligations under such transactions, the counterparty could foreclose on the collateral and take possession of the Company’s assets and/or call capital from the Unitholders for purposes of repaying debt.

The terms of any leverage utilized by the Company are likely to impose significant restrictions on the Company’s operations and investment program, including as to the Company’s ability to pay distributions, incur additional leverage and engage in certain transactions.

Investments in Smaller and Middle Market Companies. The Company generally invests in smaller and middle market companies. While smaller and middle market companies generally have potential for rapid growth, they often involve higher risks because they may lack the management experience, financial resources, product diversification, competitive strength and access to capital of larger companies. In addition, in many instances, the frequency and volume of the trading of securities for such companies may be substantially less than is typical of larger companies. As a result, the securities of smaller and middle market companies may be subject to wider price fluctuations. When liquidating positions in smaller and middle market companies, the Company may have to sell portfolio holdings at discounts from quoted prices or may have to make a series of small transactions over an extended period of time. Investments in such companies may also be particularly difficult to analyze due to (among other factors) limited attention from analysts and large institutional investors, limited access to liquidity sources and, in certain cases, limited publicly available financial information. With respect to the Company’s investments in SME and similar loans, the Company may receive less borrower information, receive less collateral and be subject to heightened default risk as compared to loans made to other types of entities.

41

Hedging Transactions and Related Risks. The Company may, but is not required to, engage in hedging transactions. In particular, as many of the Company’s Portfolio Investments are expected to consist of relatively illiquid securities whose price behavior is not particularly correlated to general fixed income or equity index returns, such Portfolio Investments are expected to be difficult or expensive to hedge, and as such the Company may not employ any hedging strategy in respect of such Portfolio Investments (including with respect to their credit risk). To the extent the Adviser employs a hedging strategy for the Company, the success of any such hedging strategy will depend, in part, upon the Adviser’s ability to correctly assess the degree of correlation between the performance of the instruments used in the hedging strategy and the performance of the investments being hedged. Since the characteristics of many securities change as markets change or time passes, the success of the Company’s hedging strategy will also be subject to the Adviser’s ability to continually recalculate, readjust and execute hedges in an efficient and timely manner. While the Company may enter into hedging transactions to seek to reduce risk, such transactions may result in a poorer overall performance for the Company than if it had not engaged in such hedging transactions. For a variety of reasons, the Adviser may not seek to establish a precise correlation between the hedging instruments utilized and the portfolio holdings being hedged. Such an imprecise correlation may prevent the Company from achieving the intended hedge or expose the Company to risk of loss. Additionally, the Adviser may not hedge against a particular risk because it does not regard the probability of the risk occurring to be sufficiently high as to justify the cost of the hedge, or because it does not foresee the occurrence of the risk. Moreover, there is no guarantee that the Company’s intended hedging strategy will be successful in hedging out the subject risks.

Due Diligence Risk. When conducting due diligence and making an assessment regarding a Portfolio Investment, the Adviser relies on the resources available to it, including internal sources of information as well as information provided by third parties. The due diligence process may at times be required to rely on limited or incomplete information. The Adviser expects to select Portfolio Investments in part on the basis of information and data filed with various government regulators and publicly available or made directly available by prospective portfolio companies or third parties. The Adviser expects that it will not be in a position to confirm the completeness, genuineness or accuracy of such information and data, and will therefore be dependent upon the integrity of the management of the entities filing such information and of such portfolio companies and third parties providing such information. In addition, there can be no assurance that any consultants or experts engaged by the Adviser will accurately evaluate such Portfolio Investments. Investment analyses and decisions by the Adviser may be undertaken on an expedited basis to enable the Company to take advantage of investment opportunities with accelerated timelines. In such cases, the available information at the time of an investment decision may be limited, inaccurate and/or incomplete. Accordingly, the Adviser cannot guarantee that its due diligence investigations will reveal or highlight all relevant facts that may be necessary or helpful in evaluating investment opportunities. Furthermore, the Company bears its proportionate share of all due diligence-related fees, costs, expenses and liabilities (including in respect of investments that are not ultimately consummated); such fees, costs, expenses and liabilities may be significant and could reduce Company returns.

Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk refers to the risks associated with market changes in interest rates. In general, rising interest rates will negatively impact the price of fixed rate debt instruments and falling interest rates will have a positive effect on the price of such debt instruments. Many of the Company’s investments are expected to be variable rate loans with interest that adjusts with market rates. These loans will generally also react to interest rate changes in a similar manner although generally to a lesser degree (depending, however, on the characteristics of the reset terms, including the index chosen, frequency of reset and reset caps or floors, among other factors). The Company’s other investments and transactions (e.g., derivatives) may also be affected by changes in interest rates. Declines in market value, if not offset by any corresponding gains on hedging instruments, may ultimately reduce earnings or result in losses to the Company.

The prices of long-term debt obligations generally fluctuate more than prices of short-term debt obligations as interest rates change. To the extent the Company invests in longer-term Portfolio Investments, it will be impacted to a greater degree by changes in market interest rates than if the Company invested primarily in short-term debt securities.

42

To the extent we borrow money, or issue preferred units, to make investments, our net investment income will depend, in part, upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds or pay distributions on preferred units and the rate at which we invest those funds. As a result, we can offer no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income in the event we use debt to finance our investments. In periods of rising interest rates, our cost of funds would increase, except to the extent we issue fixed rate debt or preferred units, which could reduce our net investment income. We expect that our long-term fixed-rate investments will be financed primarily with equity and long-term debt. We may use interest rate risk management techniques in an effort to limit our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. Such techniques may include various interest rate hedging activities to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act.

Further, rising interest rates could also adversely affect our performance if we hold investments with floating interest rates, subject to specified minimum interest rates (such as a LIBOR floor), while at the same time engaging in borrowings subject to floating interest rates not subject to such minimums. In such a scenario, rising interest rates may increase our interest expense, even though our interest income from Portfolio Investments is not increasing in a corresponding manner as a result of such minimum interest rates.

Liquidity Risk. Most of the Company’s Portfolio Investments at any given time are expected to be illiquid, such that either no market exists for them or they are restricted as to their transferability under federal, state or foreign securities laws. Similarly, the Adviser may from time to time possess material, non-public information about an issuer, which could limit the ability of the Company to buy and sell Portfolio Investments. The illiquid nature of the Company’s positions may make it difficult, if not impossible, for the Company to (i) close out unprofitable positions and redeploy capital, except when a viable exit strategy can be developed (which may require a much longer commitment than the Adviser had anticipated), and (ii) meet margin calls or similar requirements of Company transaction counterparties to furnish additional liquid collateral. In addition, the sale of the Company’s investments may be made at substantial discounts and/or otherwise disadvantageous terms.

Inflation/Deflation Risk. Inflation risk is the risk that the value of assets or income from the Company’s Portfolio Investments will be worth less in the future as inflation decreases the value of payments at future dates. As inflation increases, the real value of the Company’s portfolio could decline and the interest payments on Company borrowings, if any, may increase. Deflation risk is the risk that prices throughout the economy decline over time. Deflation may have an adverse effect on the creditworthiness of issuers and may make issuer default more likely or materially impair the ability of distressed issuers to restructure, which may result in a decline in the value of the Company’s portfolio. Though the Company may enter into instruments related to inflation or deflation (such as inflation-indexed bonds), it is under no obligation to do so.

Counterparty Risk. The Company is exposed to counterparty risk when trading on a “delivery versus payment” basis, and at times a more significant level of counterparty risk to the extent it (among other things) uses over-the-counter derivatives, listed derivatives, and futures, enters into repurchase agreements, trades agency mortgage-backed securities in the To-Be-Announced market, lends its portfolio securities or allows a prime broker, if any, or an over-the-counter derivatives counterparty to retain possession of collateral and/or other assets. The Company may experience a loss to the extent certain transactions have increased in value but the counterparty fails to meet its contractual obligations, goes bankrupt, or otherwise experiences a business interruption; in addition, any such events may result in the complete or partial loss of any collateral posted as margin. The Company is not subject to any limits on its exposure to any one counterparty nor to a requirement that counterparties maintain a specific rating by a nationally recognized rating organization to be considered for potential transactions. To the extent that the Adviser’s view with respect to a particular counterparty changes (whether due to external events or otherwise), existing transactions are not required to be terminated or modified.

While counterparty risk is always present in each transaction, it can also be more pronounced during unusually adverse market conditions or during periods of market volatility. This may result in, among other things, the Company having a greater need for cash or securities to secure the Company’s increased mark-to-market exposure in connection with the derivatives transactions in its portfolio.

43

Certain markets in which the Company may effect transactions are bilateral over-the-counter or interdealer markets, and may also include unregulated private markets. The lack of a common clearing facility in these bilateral markets creates increased counterparty risk. The participants in such markets typically are not subject to the same level of credit evaluation and regulatory oversight as are members of exchange-based or regulated markets. This exposes the Company to the direct risk that a counterparty will not settle a transaction in accordance with its terms and conditions because of a dispute over the terms of the contract (whether or not bona fide) or because of a credit or liquidity problem, thus causing the Company to suffer a loss. Counterparty risk exists in transactions with both long and short maturities, where events may intervene to prevent settlement. In addition, the Company may also be exposed to similar risks with respect to non-U.S. brokers in jurisdictions where there are delayed settlement periods.

There can be no assurance that a counterparty will be able or willing to make timely settlement payments or otherwise meet its obligations, especially during unusually adverse market conditions. A default of a counterparty may cause trades with such counterparty not to settle and therefore result in a loss. The Company typically may only close out over-the-counter transactions with the relevant counterparty, and may only transfer a position with the consent of the particular counterparty.

In connection with entering into derivatives transactions, the Company typically will post variation margin (i.e., mark-to-market) to, and receive variation margin from, its counterparties. In some cases, the Company will be required to post initial margin (i.e., a significant upfront deposit unrelated to the transaction’s marked-to-market value) to its counterparties. In the case of bilateral over-the-counter derivatives transactions, the Company or the counterparty, as applicable, will directly hold collateral posted to it by the other party to the transaction, and such collateral will not be held by a central clearing house. The parties typically exchange variation margin on a daily basis based on the marked-to-market value of the transaction. When a counterparty’s obligations are not fully secured by collateral or if the Company posts initial margin directly to a counterparty, then the Company is essentially an unsecured creditor of the counterparty. If the counterparty defaults, the Company will have contractual remedies, but there is no assurance that a counterparty will be able to meet its obligations pursuant to such contracts or that, in the event of default, the Company will succeed in enforcing contractual remedies. Counterparty risk still exists even if a counterparty’s obligations are secured by collateral because the Company’s interest in collateral may not be perfected or additional collateral may not be promptly posted as required. Significant market movements may occur in a short amount of time, which could cause a party to be significantly under-collateralized. Counterparty risk also may be more pronounced if a counterparty’s obligations exceed the amount of collateral held by the Company (if any), the Company is unable to exercise its interest in collateral upon default by the counterparty or the collateral decreases in value, or the termination value of the instrument varies significantly from marked-to-market value of the instrument.

As noted above, the Company may provide certain of its assets as collateral to counterparties in connection with derivatives transactions or forward/repo contracts. Such assets typically are subject to a “haircut,” as a result of which the counterparties may be over-collateralized with respect to the Company. Such haircuts may vary in size depending on the type of collateral posted and/or the type of transaction entered into with a counterparty. To the extent the Company allows a counterparty to retain possession of any collateral and/or other assets, the Company may be treated as an unsecured creditor of such counterparty in the event of the counterparty’s insolvency, and may lose some or all of the collateral posted.

Due to the nature of the Company’s investments, the Company may enter into over-the-counter derivatives transactions and/or execute a significant portion of its securities transactions through a limited number of counterparties, and events that affect the creditworthiness of any of those counterparties may have a pronounced effect on the Company. Additionally, the Company may be exposed to documentation risk, including the risk that the parties may disagree as to the proper interpretation of the terms of a contract (e.g., the definition of default). The Adviser typically evaluates the creditworthiness of the counterparties to the Company’s transactions or their guarantors prior to and at the time the Company enters into a transaction. The Company is not restricted from dealing with any particular counterparty or from concentrating any or all transactions with one counterparty. The

44

ability of the Company to transact business with any one of a number of counterparties, the lack of any meaningful and independent evaluation of such counterparties’ financial capabilities and the absence of a regulated market to facilitate settlement may increase the potential for losses by the Company. Counterparty risk with respect to derivatives will be affected by new rules and regulations affecting the derivatives market. Certain derivatives transactions are required to be centrally cleared, and (once centrally cleared) a party to a cleared derivatives transaction is subject to the credit risk of the clearing house and the clearing member through which it holds its cleared position, rather than the credit risk of its original counterparty to the derivatives transaction. Credit risk of market participants with respect to derivatives that are centrally cleared is concentrated in a few clearing houses, and the failure of a clearing house of centrally cleared derivatives has yet to occur; therefore, it is unclear what impact an insolvency of a clearing house would ultimately have on the Company or the financial system generally. A clearing member is obligated by contract and by applicable regulation to segregate all funds received from customers with respect to cleared derivatives transactions from the clearing member’s proprietary assets. However, in the U.S. all funds and other property received by a clearing member from its customers with respect to cleared derivatives are generally held by the clearing member on a commingled basis in an omnibus account, and the clearing member may invest those funds on a limited basis in certain instruments permitted under the applicable regulations. Therefore, the Company might not be fully protected in the event of the bankruptcy of the Company’s clearing member because the Company would be limited to recovering only a pro rata share of all available funds segregated on behalf of the clearing member’s customers for a relevant account class. In addition, if a clearing member does not comply with the applicable regulations or its agreement with the Company, or in the event of fraud or misappropriation of customer assets by a clearing member, the Company could have only an unsecured creditor claim in an insolvency of the clearing member with respect to the margin held by the clearing member.

The Company’s ability to exercise remedies, such as the termination of transactions, netting of obligations and realization on collateral, in the event of an insolvency of its counterparties (or their affiliates) could be stayed or eliminated under new special resolution regimes adopted in the U.S., the European Union (“EU”) and various other jurisdictions. Such regimes provide government authorities with broad authority to conduct a resolution of a financial institution that is in danger of default. With respect to counterparties who are subject to such proceedings in the EU, the liabilities of such counterparties to the Company could be reduced, eliminated or converted to equity (sometimes referred to as a “bail in”). See also “—Changes to Derivatives Regulation” below.

Many of the Company’s investments are expected to be in alternative transactions (e.g., company/entity investments), which often have transaction terms (including those relating to the leveraging of such investments) that are specific to that particular transaction, and depart from the more common practice of acquiring liquid securities from broker-dealers on the secondary market. Counterparty risk is also greater to the extent a transaction is not effected on a “delivery versus payment” basis. Such transactions may give rise to (among other things) risks associated with settlement and other performance obligations of transaction parties. In these situations, counterparty and related risks are expected to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis by the Company’s investment team. Such risks may be particularly difficult to evaluate due to the idiosyncratic nature of such transactions, and there can be no assurance that the Company’s investment team will be successful in this regard.

Financial Fraud. Instances of fraud and other deceptive practices committed by management, employees or Service Providers of the Company’s Portfolio Investments or by other financial institutions may undermine the Adviser’s due diligence efforts with respect to, and/or negatively affect the valuation of, the Company’s Portfolio Investments. In addition, financial fraud may contribute to overall market volatility, which can negatively impact the Company’s investment program.

OFAC, FCPA and Related Considerations. Economic sanction laws in the U.S. and other jurisdictions may prohibit the Adviser, its personnel and the Company from transacting with or in certain countries and with certain individuals and companies. In the U.S., the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control administers and enforces laws, Executive Orders and regulations establishing U.S. economic and trade sanctions.

45

Such sanctions prohibit, among other things, transactions with, and the provision of services to, certain foreign countries, territories, entities and individuals. These types of sanctions may restrict the Company’s investment activities.

In some countries, there is a greater acceptance than in the U.S. of government involvement in commercial activities, and of corruption. The Company may be adversely affected because of its unwillingness to participate in transactions that violate such laws or regulations. Such laws and regulations may make it difficult in certain circumstances for the Company to act successfully on investment opportunities and for Portfolio Investments to obtain or retain business.

In recent years, the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) have devoted greater resources to enforcement of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”). In addition, the United Kingdom has recently significantly expanded the reach of its anti-bribery laws. Violations of the FCPA or other applicable anti-corruption laws or anti-bribery laws could result in, among other things, civil and criminal penalties, material fines, profit disgorgement, injunctions on future conduct, securities litigation and a general loss of investor confidence, any one of which could adversely affect the Company’s ability to achieve its investment objective and/or conduct its operations.

General Risks Related to the Company

Risk of Loss. An investment in the Company is highly risky. There can be no assurance that the Company will achieve its investment objective or any particular level of returns. An investor may lose all of its money by investing in the Company. Among other things, the Company may invest in assets that are underperforming or non-performing and/or in securities of issuers who are under financial stress. By their nature, such investments are considered speculative and entail substantial risks that are generally higher than the risks of investments in performing assets and securities of issuers that are not under financial stress. Any losses in the Company will be borne solely by investors in the Company and not by the Adviser or any of its respective affiliates (except to the extent they invest capital in the Company, in which case they, with respect to such capital invested, will bear their pro rata portion of such loss).

No Market for Units. Pursuant to the LLC Agreement, Units are not generally transferable and voluntary withdrawal of Units is not allowed. A Unitholder is not expected to be able to sell, assign or transfer its Units. In addition, transfers of Units may be affected by restrictions on resales imposed by federal and state securities laws. The Units are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) or any state securities laws and may not be transferred unless registered under applicable federal and state securities laws or unless an exemption from such laws is available. The Company has no plans, and is under no obligation, to register the Units under the Securities Act or any state securities laws. No market exists for the Units, and none is expected to develop. Therefore, an investment in the Company must be considered illiquid and must only be made by persons that are able to bear the risk of their investment in the Company for an indefinite period of time.

Management Risk and Reliance on Management. The Company is subject to management risk because the Adviser actively manages its investment portfolio. The Adviser will apply investment and disposition techniques and risk analyses in making investment and disposition decisions for the Company, but there can be no guarantee that these will produce the desired results. In addition, as Unitholders may not participate in the management of the Company, only investors who are willing to entrust all aspects of the management of the Company to the Adviser should subscribe for Units.

The success of the Company is highly dependent on the financial and managerial expertise of the Adviser and any consultants or other service providers retained by the Company. The success of the Adviser is highly dependent on the financial and managerial expertise of the investment professionals, who may not continue to be employed by or associated with the Adviser during the entire term of the Company. In addition, a number of members of the professional staff of the Adviser are investors in other investment vehicles advised by SCP and

46

are actively involved in managing the investment decisions of these investment vehicles, as well as investment decisions of other clients of SCP. Accordingly, the members of the professional staff of the Adviser have demands on their time for the investment, monitoring and other functions of other funds and other clients advised by SCP. In addition, competition in the financial services, private equity and alternative asset management industries for qualified investment professionals is intense. The Adviser’s continued ability to effectively manage the Company’s investments depends on its ability to attract new investment professionals and to retain and motivate its existing investment professionals.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time during the Company’s term, the Adviser may assign the full and exclusive authority and responsibility granted to it under the Investment Management Agreement to an investment adviser under common control with the Adviser, subject to applicable law. The Adviser may take any actions that are necessary or incidental to any such assignment, including assigning the Investment Management Agreement or causing the Company to enter into a new Investment Management Agreement. Although it is expected that (x) any new investment adviser would be a registered investment adviser under the Advisers Act, (y) the management fee and incentive fee payable by the Company to such entities would be identical to that payable to the Adviser and (z) certain investment professionals would continue to be responsible for managing the Company’s assets, there is no guarantee that any or all of such characteristics will apply to any such new investment adviser.

The Investment Committee may delegate non-investment decisions (including decisions relating to cash management and similar non-material transactions (which shall not be considered “investments” for these purposes), diligence decisions, decisions relating to transactions involving material non-public information and decisions relating to the engagement of consultants, law firms and other service providers) to other investment professionals in their sole discretion. Any decisions made by such subset or other investment professionals may be materially different and/or less optimal than decisions that would have been made by the Investment Committee.

Referral Relationships with Financial Sponsors. The Adviser expects that the professional staff of the Adviser will maintain and develop their relationships with financial sponsors, including venture capital sponsors, and the Company will rely to a significant extent upon these relationships to provide the Company with potential investment opportunities. If the professional staff of the Adviser fail to maintain their existing relationships or develop new relationships with other sponsors or sources of investment opportunities, the Company will not be able to grow its investment portfolio. In addition, individuals with whom the professional staff of the Adviser have relationships are not obligated to provide the Company with investment opportunities, and, therefore, there is no assurance that such relationships will generate investment opportunities for the Company. If the Adviser is unable to source investment opportunities, the Company may hold a greater percentage of its assets in cash and cash equivalents than anticipated, which could impact potential returns on the Company’s portfolio.

Recourse to the Company’s Assets. The Company’s assets, including any Portfolio Investments made by the Company and any capital held by the Company, are available to satisfy all liabilities and other obligations of the Company. In addition, the Company may pledge its right to call capital from Unitholders. If the Company becomes subject to a liability, parties seeking to have the liability satisfied may have recourse to the Company’s assets generally and may not be limited to any particular asset, such as the Portfolio Investment giving rise to the liability. To the extent the Company chooses to use special-purpose entities for individual transactions to reduce recourse risk (and it may, but will be under no obligation to do so), the bona fides of such entities may be subject to later challenge based on a number of theories, including veil piercing or substantive consolidation.

Unspecified Use of Proceeds. The proceeds from the issuance of the Units are intended to be invested in Portfolio Investments. Unitholders will not have an opportunity to evaluate for themselves the relevant economic, financial and other information regarding the investments in which the proceeds from the issuance of the Units will be invested and, accordingly, are dependent upon the judgment and ability of the Adviser in investing and managing the capital of the Company.

47

Identification of Potential Investment Opportunities. There is no assurance that the Adviser’s analysis in this regard, as implemented, will take into consideration all appropriate factors or appropriately weigh the factors that are considered in its analysis, especially given the heightened difficulty of the analysis required to evaluate certain Portfolio Investments. In particular, catalysts and/or exit strategies that initially appear to be viable may be precluded over time due to economic, legal, political or other factors. In addition, because the successful implementation of the Company’s investment strategy depends, in part, on its ability to successfully predict and take advantage of changing market conditions, to the extent it is unable to do so, returns may be adversely affected. These considerations are particularly relevant in light of the current uncertain economic and regulatory environment. See “—Regulatory Risks Relating to the Company” below.

Competition; Potential for Insufficient Investment Opportunities. The business of identifying and effecting investments of the types contemplated by the Adviser is competitive and there can be no assurance that the Adviser will be able to identify and obtain a sufficient number of investment opportunities to invest the full amount of capital that may be committed to the Company. Increased competition for, or a diminishment in the available supply of, potential Portfolio Investments could result in lower returns on such Portfolio Investments. The Company may engage in auction or similar bidding processes with respect to certain Portfolio Investments, which processes are often highly competitive and may involve numerous other bidders about which the Company possesses limited or no information; as a result, the foregoing considerations will be applicable with respect to any such processes.

Insufficient Capital for Follow-On Investments. Following its initial investment in a Portfolio Investment, the Company may have the opportunity to increase its investment in such Portfolio Investment. There is no assurance that the Company will make follow-on investments or that the Company will have sufficient resources to, or be permitted to, make such investments. Any decision not to make follow-on investments or the Company’s inability to make them may have a substantial negative impact on the company in need of such an investment, may result in missed opportunities for the Company or may result in dilution of the Company’s investment.

Concentration of Portfolio Investments. The Company may participate in a limited number of Portfolio Investments and, as a consequence, the aggregate return of the Company may be substantially adversely affected by the unfavorable performance of any single investment. The Company has a broad and flexible investment mandate, and, beyond the asset diversification requirements associated with the Company’s intention to comply with the requirements to qualify as a RIC for U.S. tax purposes, and except as noted above, the Company is not subject to any limits or proportions with respect to the mix of permitted Portfolio Investments. As a result, the Company’s Portfolio Investments could potentially be concentrated in relatively few strategies, issuers, industries, markets, geographies or investment types. Such non-diversification would make the Company more susceptible to risks associated with a single economic, political or regulatory occurrence than a more diversified portfolio might be. The Company could be subject to significant losses if it holds a relatively large position in a single strategy, issuer, industry, market, geographic region or a particular type of Portfolio Investment that declines in value, and the losses could increase even further if the Portfolio Investments cannot be liquidated without adverse market reaction or are otherwise adversely affected by changes in market conditions or circumstances.

Third-Party Involvement. The Company may hold a portion of its investments through partnerships, joint ventures, securitization vehicles or other entities with third-party investors (collectively, “joint ventures”). Joint venture investments involve various risks, including the risk that the Company will not be able to implement investment decisions or exit strategies because of limitations on the Company’s control under applicable agreements with joint venture partners, the risk that a joint venture partner may become bankrupt or may at any time have economic or business interests or goals that are inconsistent with those of the Company, the risk that a joint venture partner may be in a position to take action contrary to the Company’s objectives, the risk of liability based upon the actions of a joint venture partner and the risk of disputes or litigation with such partner and the inability to enforce fully all rights (or the incurrence of additional risk in connection with enforcement of rights)

48

one partner may have against the other, including in connection with foreclosure on partner loans, because of risks arising under state law. In addition, the Company may be liable for actions of its joint venture partners.

Leveraged Companies. The Company will invest in Portfolio Investments whose capital structures have significant leverage. Such Portfolio Investments are inherently more sensitive to declines in revenues and asset values and to increases in expenses and interest rates. The leveraged capital structure of such Portfolio Investments will increase the exposure of the Portfolio Investments to adverse economic factors such as downturns in the economy or deterioration in the condition of the Portfolio Investment, its underlying assets or its industry. Additionally, the securities acquired by the Company may be the most junior securities in what may be a complex capital structure, and thus subject to the greatest risk of loss.

Portfolio Turnover. The Company will not place any limit on the rate of portfolio turnover, and Portfolio Investments may be sold or otherwise disposed of without regard to the time they have been held when, in the judgment of the Adviser, investment considerations warrant such action. A high rate of portfolio turnover involves correspondingly greater expenses than a lower rate, may act to reduce the Company’s investment gains or create a loss for investors and may result in significant tax costs for investors depending on the tax provisions applicable to such investors.

No Assurance of Cash Distributions. Subject to the Board’s discretion and applicable legal restrictions, the Company expects to declare and pay distributions quarterly. The Company expects to pay these distributions out of assets legally available for distribution. However, there are no assurances that the Company will achieve investment results that will allow a targeted level of cash distributions or year-to-year increases in cash distributions. All distributions that are made will be at the discretion of the Board and will depend on earnings, financial condition, maintenance of RIC status and other factors as the Board may deem to be relevant. The Company’s ability to pay distributions might be adversely affected by the impact of one or more of the risk factors described in this annual report, including the COVID-19 pandemic described above. For example, if the temporary closure of many corporate offices, retail stores, and manufacturing facilities and factories in the jurisdictions, including the United States, affected by the COVID-19 pandemic were to continue for an extended period of time it could result in reduced cash flows to the Company from its prospective portfolio companies, which could reduce cash available for distribution to Unitholders. If the Company violates certain covenants under its existing or future credit facilities or other leverage, the Company may be limited in its ability to make distributions. To the extent the Company makes distributions to Unitholders that include a return of capital, such portion of the distribution essentially constitutes a return of the Unitholder’s investment. In addition, the inability to satisfy the asset coverage test applicable to a BDC may limit the Company’s ability to pay distributions. There can be no assurances that the Company will pay distributions to Unitholders in the future.

In certain cases, the Company may recognize income before or without receiving the accompanying cash. Depending on the amount of noncash income, this could result in difficulty satisfying the annual distribution requirement applicable to RICs. Accordingly, the Company may have to sell some Portfolio Investments at times it would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or reduce new investments to meet these distribution requirements.

U.S. Dollar Denomination of Units. Units are denominated in U.S. Dollars. Investors subscribing for Units in any country in which U.S. Dollars are not the local currency should note that changes in the rate of exchange between U.S. Dollars and such currency may have an adverse effect on the value, price or income of the investment to such investor. There may be foreign exchange regulations applicable to investments in non-U.S. currencies in certain jurisdictions. Each prospective investor should consult with its own counsel and advisors as to all legal, tax, financial and related matters concerning an investment in the Units.

Forward-Looking Statements. This report contains forward-looking statements, including observations about market and industry and regulatory trends as of the original date of this report. Those forward-looking statements reflect the Adviser’s current view in respect of future events. Actual events could differ materially from those in

49

the forward-looking statements as a result of factors beyond the Adviser’s or the Company’s control. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements. No party has an obligation to update any of the forward-looking statements in this report.

Projections. The Company may rely upon projections, forecasts or estimates developed by the Adviser, the Company or an issuer in which the Company is invested concerning the issuer’s future performance and cash flow. Projections, forecasts and estimates are forward-looking statements, are inherently uncertain and are based upon certain assumptions. Actual events are difficult to predict and beyond the Company’s control. Actual events may differ from those assumed. Some important factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those in any forward-looking statements include changes in interest rates; domestic and foreign business, market, financial or legal conditions; leverage amounts and costs; and the degree to which the Portfolio Investments are hedged and the effectiveness of such hedges. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that estimated returns or projections can be realized or that actual returns or results will not be materially lower than those estimated therein.

Valuation of Illiquid Assets. It is expected that the majority of the Company’s investments will be in securities or other financial instruments for which market quotations are not available. The process of valuing securities for which reliable market quotations are not available is based on inherent uncertainties, and the resulting values may differ from values that would have been determined had a ready market existed for such securities, from values placed on such securities by other investors and from prices at which such securities may ultimately be sold. In addition, third-party pricing information may at times not be available regarding certain of the Company’s assets or, if available, may not be considered reliable. In particular, recent disruptions in the credit markets have resulted in a severe lack of liquidity for many securities, making them more difficult to value and, in many cases, putting significant downward pressure on prices. Subject to approval by the Board, the Adviser will determine the fair value of securities, loans or other instruments for which market quotes are not readily available (or if extraordinary events occur after the last readily available quotation). There can be no assurance that such valuations will be reliable, accurate or reflective of the prices at which such investments are ultimately realized. In addition, certain of the securities or other assets that the Company seeks to sell or acquire via cross trade may be illiquid and difficult to value, therefore there can be no assurance that such valuation will be accurate.

Assets Believed to Be Undervalued or Incorrectly Valued. Securities that the Adviser believes are fundamentally undervalued or incorrectly valued may not ultimately be valued in the capital markets at prices and/or within the timeframe the Adviser anticipates. As a result, the Company may lose all or substantially all of its investment in any particular instance.

Model Risks. The Adviser may employ financial/analytical models to aid in the selection of the Portfolio Investments, to allocate investments across various strategies and risks and to determine the risk profile of the Company. If any such models are employed, the success of the Company’s investment activities will depend, in large part, upon the viability of these models. There can be no assurance that the models are currently viable, or will remain viable during the term of the Company, due to various factors, including the quality of the data input into the models and the assumptions underlying such models, which to varying degrees involve the exercise of judgment, as well as the possibility of errors in constructing or of using the model. Even if the models function as anticipated, they cannot account for all factors that may influence the returns on the Portfolio Investments. Also, there can be no assurance that the investment professionals utilizing the models will be able to (i) determine that any model is or will become not viable or not completely viable or (ii) notice, predict or adequately react to any change in the viability of a model. The use of a model that is not viable or not materially viable could, at any time, have a material adverse effect on the performance of the Company.

Third-Party Litigation. The Company’s investment activities may subject it to the risks and costs of becoming involved in litigation with third parties due to, among other reasons, the fact that different investor groups may have qualitatively different, and frequently conflicting, interests with respect to certain Portfolio Investments.

50

The risk of litigation with third parties will be elevated in situations where an issuer is stressed or distressed. See “—Litigation and Related Risks Associated with Origination and Servicing” above. The expense of defending against claims by third parties and paying any amounts pursuant to settlements or judgments, or bringing claims against third parties, would generally be borne by the Company and would reduce net assets. In addition, the Company’s investment activities may subject it to certain risks inherent in restructuring, bankruptcy and similar proceedings. See “—Risks Associated with Bankruptcy and Insolvency Cases” below.

Broad Indemnification. The Company and/or the Adviser on behalf of the Company may enter into various agreements or arrangements which limit the liability of its Service Providers, including the Adviser and its affiliates, the Administrative Coordinator, the Custodian, and their affiliates, employees, officers and directors, and require the Company to indemnify and/or provide broad representations, warranties and covenants in favor of such persons. U.S. federal and state securities laws impose liabilities under certain circumstances on persons that cannot be waived by contract, other agreements or documents. Therefore, nothing in those agreements should be deemed or construed in a manner that purports to waive or limit any right to the extent prohibited by law.

The Company is required to indemnify the Adviser and its respective affiliates, each of the former, current and future shareholders, partners, members, other equity holders, officers, directors, employees, managers, trustees, agents and other representatives of the Adviser and its respective affiliates, and other persons set forth in the LLC Agreement as an “Indemnitee” for Claims (as defined in the LLC Agreement) that may accrue to or be incurred by an Indemnitee, in connection with any claim, demand, investigation, suit, proceeding or action in which an Indemnitee may become involved, as a party or otherwise, or with which an Indemnitee may be threatened, relating to or arising out of the investments or other activities of the Company, activities undertaken in connection with the Company, or otherwise relating to or arising out of the LLC Agreement or the Subscription Agreement, and otherwise as provided in the LLC Agreement or the Subscription Agreement. Such Claims may be material and have an adverse effect on the returns to the Unitholders. The Company may also provide broad indemnities, representations, warranties and covenants in connection with the acquisition, management and disposition of Portfolio Investments or otherwise in connection with the Company’s investment program.

Any indemnification obligations of the Company would be payable from the assets of the Company, including the unfunded Commitments of the Unitholders, and would adversely affect the Company’s returns.

Adverse Consequences of Default. A Unitholder in default with respect to its unfunded Commitment may experience material adverse effects on its investment. When a Unitholder defaults, the Board, in its discretion, may cause the defaulting Unitholder to forfeit a portion of the distributions to which the defaulting Unitholder may otherwise have been entitled. The Board may also require a forced sale of the defaulting Unitholder’s Interest. In addition, the Board may pursue any available legal or equitable remedies, with the expenses of collection of the unpaid amount, including attorneys’ fees, to be paid by the defaulting Unitholder.

Upon the default of a Unitholder, the Company may deliver an amended funding notice to the non-defaulting Unitholders increasing their capital contributions by up to an aggregate amount equal to the capital contribution that the defaulting Unitholder failed to make, not in excess of a Unitholder’s unfunded Commitment.

The Board may require a defaulting Unitholder to contribute the entirety of its remaining Commitment to the Company. For any such Unitholder, the return on its Company investment may be materially lower than returns to Unitholders who do not pre-fund their Commitments.

Distributions in Kind. If distributions are made of assets held by the Company in lieu of cash, the amount of any such distribution will be accounted for at the fair market value of such assets as determined in accordance with procedures set forth in the LLC Agreement. An independent appraisal generally will not be required and is not expected to be obtained. Assets distributed in kind may not be readily marketable or disposable, and Unitholders therefore must be prepared to bear the risks of owning such assets for an indefinite period of time (and to incur costs and expenses in connection with any disposition thereof). In addition, there can be no assurance that the value of such assets as determined in accordance with procedures set forth in the LLC Agreement will ultimately be realized.

51

Risks Related to Electronic Communications/Cybersecurity Risk. The Company provides to Unitholders statements, reports and other communications relating to the Company and/or the Unitholder’s Interest in electronic form, such as e-mail or via a password protected website (“Electronic Communications”). Electronic Communications may be modified, corrupted, or contain viruses or malicious code, and may not be compatible with a Unitholder’s electronic system. In addition, reliance on Electronic Communications involves the risk of inaccessibility, power outages or slowdowns for a variety of reasons. These periods of inaccessibility may delay or prevent receipt of reports or other information by the Unitholders.

While the Adviser employs various measures to address cybersecurity-related issues, the Adviser, the Administrative Coordinator, the Company and their respective Service Providers may nevertheless be subject to operational and information security risks resulting from cybersecurity incidents. A cybersecurity incident refers to both intentional and unintentional events that may cause the Adviser, the Company or their respective Service Providers to lose or compromise confidential information, suffer data corruption or lose operational capacity. Cybersecurity incidents include stealing or corrupting data maintained online or digitally, denial of service attacks on websites, the unauthorized release of confidential information or various other operational disruptions. If unauthorized parties gain access to such information and technology systems, they may be able to steal, publish, delete or modify private and sensitive information, including nonpublic personal information related to Unitholders (and their beneficial owners) and material nonpublic information. The systems the Company has implemented to manage risks relating to these types of events could prove to be inadequate and, if compromised, could become inoperable for extended periods of time, cease to function properly or fail to adequately secure private information. Breaches such as those involving covertly introduced malware, impersonation of authorized users and industrial or other espionage may not be identified even with sophisticated prevention and detection systems, potentially resulting in further harm and preventing them from being addressed appropriately. The failure of these systems or of disaster recovery plans for any reason could cause significant interruptions in the Company’s and the Adviser’s operations and result in a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data, including personal information relating to Unitholders, material nonpublic information and other sensitive information in the Adviser’s possession.

A disaster or a disruption in the infrastructure that supports the Adviser’s business, including a disruption involving electronic communications or other services used by the Adviser or third parties with whom the Adviser conducts business, or directly affecting the Adviser’s headquarters, could have a material adverse impact on the Adviser’s ability to continue to operate its business without interruption. The Adviser’s disaster recovery programs may not be sufficient to mitigate the harm that may result from such a disaster or disruption. In addition, insurance and other safeguards might only partially reimburse the Adviser for its losses, if at all.

Cybersecurity incidents may adversely impact the Company and its Unitholders. There is no guarantee that the Adviser, the Company and/or their respective Service Providers will be successful in protecting against cybersecurity incidents.

In addition, cybersecurity has become a top priority for regulators around the world, and some jurisdictions have enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals of data security breaches involving certain types of personal data. If the Adviser fails to comply with the relevant laws and regulations, the Adviser could suffer financial losses, a disruption of its businesses, liability to investors, regulatory intervention or reputational damage.

The Company and its Service Providers are currently impacted by quarantines and similar measures being enacted by governments in response to the global COVID-19 pandemic, which are obstructing the regular functioning of business workforces (including requiring employees to work from external locations and their homes). Policies of extended periods of remote working, whether by us or by our Service Providers, could strain technology resources, introduce operational risks and otherwise heighten the risks described above. Remote working environments may be less secure and more susceptible to hacking attacks, including phishing and social engineering attempts that seek to exploit the COVID-19 pandemic. Accordingly, the risks described above are heightened under current conditions.

52

Our business and the business of our portfolio companies relies upon secure information technology systems for data processing, storage and reporting. Despite careful security and controls design, implementation and updating, ours and our portfolio companies’ information technology systems could become subject to cyber-attacks. Cyber-attacks include, but are not limited to, gaining unauthorized access to digital systems (e.g., through “hacking”, malicious software coding, social engineering or “phishing” attempts) for purposes of misappropriating assets or sensitive information, corrupting data, or causing operational disruption. Cyber-attacks may also be carried out in a manner that does not require gaining unauthorized access, such as causing denial-of service attacks on websites (i.e., efforts to make network services unavailable to intended users). Our Investment Adviser’s employees have been and expect to continue to be the target of fraudulent calls, emails and other forms of activities. The result of these incidents may include disrupted operations, misstated or unreliable financial data, liability for stolen information, misappropriation of assets, increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs, litigation and damage to our business relationships, regulatory fines or penalties, or other adverse effects on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify our protective measures and to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures arising from operational and security risks related to cyber-attacks.

Our Investment Adviser’s and other service providers’ increased use of mobile and cloud technologies could heighten the risk of a cyber-attack as well as other operational risks, as certain aspects of the security of such technologies may be complex, unpredictable or beyond their control. Our Investment Adviser’s and other service providers’ reliance on mobile or cloud technology or any failure by mobile technology and cloud service providers to adequately safeguard their systems and prevent cyber-attacks could disrupt their operations and result in misappropriation, corruption or loss of personal, confidential or proprietary information. In addition, there is a risk that encryption and other protective measures against cyber-attacks may be circumvented, particularly to the extent that new computing technologies increase the speed and computing power available.

Additionally, remote working environments may be less secure and more susceptible to cyber-attacks, including phishing and social engineering attempts that seek to exploit the COVID-19 pandemic. Accordingly, the risks associated with cyber-attacks are heightened under current conditions.

Risks Related to RICs and BDCs

Failure to Qualify as a RIC. Although the Company has elected to be treated as a RIC, no assurance can be given that it will be able to maintain qualification as a RIC. To maintain qualification as a RIC, the Company must meet the following source-of-income, asset diversification, and distribution requirements.

The income source requirement will be satisfied if the Company obtains at least 90% of gross income for each year from dividends, interest, foreign currency, payments with respect to loans of certain securities, gains from the sale of units or other securities, net income from certain “qualified publicly traded partnerships,” or similar sources.

The asset diversification requirement will be satisfied if the Company meets certain asset diversification requirements at the end of each quarter of the taxable year. Failure to meet those requirements may result in the Company having to dispose of certain investments quickly in order to prevent the loss of qualification as a RIC. Because most of the Company’s investments will be in private companies, and therefore will be relatively illiquid, any such dispositions could be made at disadvantageous prices and could result in substantial losses. The Company may have difficulty satisfying the diversification requirement during the ramp-up phase until it has a portfolio of investments.

The annual distribution requirement will be satisfied if the Company distributes to our Unitholders on an annual basis at least 90% of net ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any. Because the Company may use debt financing, it is subject to certain asset coverage ratio requirements under the 1940 Act and financial covenants under loan and credit agreements that could, under certain circumstances, restrict the Company from making distributions necessary to satisfy the distribution requirement. If the Company is unable to obtain cash from other sources, it could fail to qualify as a RIC.

53

If the Company fails to qualify as a RIC for any reason and therefore becomes subject to corporate income tax, the resulting corporate taxes could substantially reduce net assets, the amount of income available for distribution and the amount of distributions.

Recognizing Income Before Receiving Cash. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Company will include in income certain amounts that the Company has not yet received in cash, such as the accrual of original issue discount (“OID”). This may arise if the Company receives warrants in connection with the making of a loan and in other circumstances, or through contracted payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest, which represents contractual interest added to the loan balance and due at the end of the loan term. Such OID, which could be significant relative to the Company’s overall investment activities, and increases in loan balances as a result of contracted PIK arrangements will be included in income before the Company receives any corresponding cash payments. The Company also may be required to include in income certain other amounts that the Company will not receive in cash.

To the extent the Company invests in OID instruments, including PIK, zero coupon bonds, and debt securities with attached warrants, investors will be exposed to the risks associated with the inclusion of such non-cash income in taxable and accounting income prior to receipt of cash, including the following:

Since in certain cases the Company may recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income, the Company may have difficulty meeting the requirement to timely distribute at least 90% of its net ordinary income and net short-term capital gains in excess of net long-term capital losses, if any, to maintain its qualification as a RIC. In such a case, the Company may have to sell some of its Portfolio Investments at times the Company would not consider advantageous or raise additional debt or equity capital or reduce new investment originations to meet these distribution requirements. If the Company is not able to obtain such cash from other sources, the Company may fail to maintain its qualification as a RIC and thus be subject to corporate-level U.S. federal income tax.

Tax Considerations Regarding Dividends for Private BDCs. We do not currently qualify as a “publicly offered regulated investment company,” as defined in the Code. Accordingly, U.S. individual and other noncorporate Unitholders will be taxed as though they received a distribution of some of our expenses. A “publicly offered regulated investment company” is a RIC whose Units are either (i) continuously offered pursuant to a public offering, (ii) regularly traded on an established securities market, or (iii) held by at least 500 persons at all times

54

during the taxable year. We anticipate that we will not qualify as a publicly offered RIC for the 2020 tax year, and we cannot determine when we will qualify as a publicly offered RIC. Since the Company is not a publicly offered RIC, a non-corporate Unitholder’s allocable portion of our affected expenses, including a portion of our management fees, will be treated as an additional distribution to the Unitholders. A non-corporate Unitholder’s allocable portion of these expenses are treated as miscellaneous itemized deductions that are not currently deductible by such Unitholder (and beginning in 2026, will be deductible to such Unitholder only to the extent they exceed 2% of such Unitholder’s adjusted gross income), and are not deductible for alternative minimum tax purposes.

Potential Dividend Deferrals. As a BDC, we are not required to make any distributions to Unitholders other than in connection with our election to be taxed as a RIC under subchapter M of the Code. In order to maintain our tax treatment as a RIC, we must distribute to Unitholders for each taxable year at least 90% of our investment company taxable income (i.e., net ordinary income plus realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses). If we qualify for taxation as a RIC, we generally will not be subject to corporate-level U.S. federal income tax on our investment company taxable income and net capital gains (i.e., realized net long-term capital gains in excess of realized net short-term capital losses) that we timely distribute to Unitholders. We will be subject to a 4% US federal excise tax on undistributed earnings of a RIC unless we distribute each calendar year at least the sum of (i) 98.0% of our ordinary income for the calendar year, (ii) 98.2% of our capital gains in excess of capital losses for the one-year period ending on October 31 of the calendar year, and (iii) any ordinary income and net capital gains for preceding years that were not distributed during such years and on which we paid no federal income tax.

Under the Code, we may satisfy certain of our RIC distributions with dividends paid after the end of the current year. In particular, if we pay a distribution in January of the following year that was declared in October, November, or December of the current year and is payable to Unitholders of record in the current year, the dividend will be treated for all US federal tax purposes as if it were paid on December 31 of the current year. In addition, under the Code, we may pay dividends, referred to as “spillover dividends,” that are paid during the following taxable year that will allow us to maintain our qualification for taxation as a RIC and eliminate our liability for corporate-level U.S. federal income tax. Under these spillover dividend procedures, we may defer distribution of income earned during the current year until December of the following year. For example, we may defer distributions of income earned during 2020 until as late as December 31, 2021. If we choose to pay a spillover dividend, we will incur the 4% U.S. federal excise tax on some or all of the distribution.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic or other disruptions in the economy, we anticipate that we may take certain actions with respect to the timing and amounts of our distributions in order to preserve cash and maintain flexibility. For example, we may defer our dividends to the following taxable year. If we defer our dividends, we may choose to utilize the spillover dividend rules discussed above and incur the 4% U.S. federal excise tax on such amounts. To further preserve cash, we may combine these deferrals of dividends with one or more distributions that are payable partially in our Units as discussed below under “Stock Dividend Considerations.”

Stock Dividend Considerations. The Company may distribute taxable dividends that are payable in part in its Units. In accordance with certain applicable U.S. Treasury regulations and published guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”), a RIC may treat a distribution of its own shares as fulfilling the RIC distribution requirements if each shareholder may elect to receive his or her entire distribution in either cash or shares of the RIC. The IRS has published a revenue procedure indicating that, in the case of publicly offered RICs, this rule will apply where the total amount of cash to be distributed is not less than 20% of the total distribution. Under this revenue procedure, if too many Unitholders elect to receive cash, the cash available for distribution must be allocated among the Unitholders electing to receive cash (with the balance of the distribution paid in shares). In no event will any Unitholder, electing to receive cash, receive less than the lesser of (a) the portion of the distribution such Unitholder has elected to receive in cash or (b) an amount equal to his or her entire distribution times the percentage limitation on cash available for distribution. Because the Company is not currently a publicly offered RIC, its ability to rely on the revenue procedure and other guidance is uncertain. If

55

the Company elects to pay a distribution in its own Units consistent with the revenue procedure and other guidance, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the amount of the dividend paid in Units will be equal to the amount of cash that could have been received instead of Units. Taxable Unitholders receiving such dividends will be required to include the amount of the dividends as ordinary income (or as long-term capital gain to the extent such distribution is properly reported as a capital gain dividend) to the extent of the Company’s current and accumulated earnings and profits for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, a U.S. Unitholder may be required to pay tax with respect to such dividends in excess of any cash received. Furthermore, with respect to non-U.S. Unitholders, the Company may be required to withhold U.S. tax with respect to such dividends, including in respect of all or a portion of such dividend that is payable in Units.

Permissible Incurred Leverage. Leverage magnifies the potential for loss on investments and on invested equity capital. As the Company uses leverage to partially finance its investments, Unitholders will experience increased risks of investing in the Company’s securities. If the value of the Company’s assets increases, then leveraging would cause the net asset value attributable to the Company’s Units to increase more sharply than it would have had the Company not leveraged. Conversely, if the value of the Company’s assets decreases, leveraging would cause net asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had the Company not leveraged its business. Similarly, any increase in the Company’s income in excess of interest payable on the borrowed funds would cause net investment income to increase more than it would without the leverage, while any decrease in the Company’s income would cause net investment income to decline more sharply than it would have had the Company not borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect the Company’s ability to pay dividends on Units, scheduled debt payments or other payments related to securities. Leverage is generally considered a speculative investment technique.

Asset Coverage Ratio. The Company may issue debt securities, other evidences of indebtedness or preferred units, and may borrow money from banks or other financial institutions, which are referred to collectively herein as “senior securities,” up to the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act permits the Company to issue senior securities in amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 150% after each issuance of senior securities. The Company’s ability to pay dividends or issue additional senior securities would be restricted if the asset coverage ratio were not at least 150%. If the value of the Company’s assets declines, the Company may be unable to satisfy this test. If that happens, the Company may be required to liquidate a portion of its investments and repay a portion of its indebtedness at a time when such sales or repayment may be disadvantageous. As a result of issuing senior securities, the Company will also be exposed to typical risks associated with leverage, including an increased risk of loss. If the Company issues preferred units, such preferred units will rank “senior” to common units in the Company’s capital structure, preferred Unitholders will have separate voting rights for certain purposes and may have rights, preferences or privileges more favorable than those of the Company’s common Units and the issuance of preferred units could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for Unitholders or otherwise be in the best interest of Unitholders.

To the extent the Company is constrained in its ability to issue debt or other senior securities, it will depend on issuances of capital interests to finance operations. As a BDC, the Company is generally not able to issue Units at a price below net asset value without first obtaining required approvals of Unitholders and independent directors in accordance with the conditions set forth in Section 63(2) of the 1940 Act. If the Company raises additional funds by issuing more common units or senior securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, common units, the percentage ownership of Unitholders at that time would decrease and Unitholders may experience dilution. In addition to issuing securities to raise capital as described above, the Company could, in the future, securitize loans to generate cash for funding new investments. An inability to successfully securitize its loan portfolio could limit the Company’s ability to grow its business, fully execute its business strategy and improve profitability.

Distribution and Asset Coverage Ratio Requirements. In order to satisfy the requirements applicable to RICs and to avoid payment of excise taxes, the Company intends to distribute to Unitholders substantially all of its ordinary income and capital gain net income except for certain net capital gains, which it intends to retain and to

56

elect to treat as deemed distributions to Unitholders. As a BDC, the Company is generally required to meet a coverage ratio of total assets to total senior securities, which would include all borrowings and any preferred units that it may issue in the future, of at least 150%. This requirement limits the amount that the Company may borrow. Because the Company will continue to need capital to grow its loan and investment portfolio, this limitation may prevent the Company from incurring debt and require the Company to raise additional equity at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so. While the Company expects to be able to borrow and to issue additional debt and equity securities, there is no assurance that debt and equity financing will be available on favorable terms or at all. In addition, as a BDC, the Company is not permitted to issue equity securities priced below net asset value without Unitholder and independent director approval in accordance with the conditions set forth in Section 63(2) of the 1940 Act. However, if the Company does obtain the necessary approvals to issue securities at prices below their net asset values, a Unitholder’s investment in the Company will experience dilution as a result of such issuance. If additional funds are not available, the Company could be forced to curtail or cease lending and investment activities, and net asset value could decrease.

Unrealized Depreciation. As a BDC, the Company is required to carry investments at market value or, if no market value is ascertainable, at fair value as determined in good faith by the Board. Decreases in the market values or fair values of investments will be recorded as unrealized depreciation. Any unrealized depreciation in the Company’s loan portfolio could be an indication of a portfolio company’s inability to meet its repayment obligations with respect to the loans whose market values or fair values decreased. This could result in realized losses in the future and ultimately in reductions of income available for distribution in future periods.

Qualifying Asset Requirements. As a BDC, the Company may not acquire any assets other than “qualifying assets” unless, at the time of such acquisition, at least 70% of its total assets are qualifying assets. Therefore, the Company may be precluded from investing in what it believes are attractive investments if such investments are not qualifying assets. Similarly, these rules could prevent the Company from making additional investments in existing portfolio companies, which could result in the dilution of its position, or could require disposal of investments at an inopportune time to comply with the 1940 Act. If the Company were forced to sell non-qualifying investments for compliance purposes, the proceeds from such sale could be significantly less than the current value of such investments. Conversely, if the Company failed to invest a sufficient portion of assets in qualifying assets, it could lose status as a BDC, which would subject the Company to substantially more regulatory restrictions and significantly decrease operating flexibility.

Regulatory Risks Relating to the Company

Exemptive Relief. The Company and the other BDCs for which SCP is the Investment Adviser (Solar Capital Ltd. (Nasdaq: SLRC) (“SLRC”), Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (Nasdaq: SUNS) (“SUNS”), and SLR HC BDC LLC (“SLR HC” and, together with SLRC and SUNS, the “SCP BDCs”) are substantially limited in their ability to co-invest in privately negotiated transactions with affiliated funds other than as permitted by the Order. While the Order permits the Company to participate in negotiated co-investment transactions with the SCP BDCs and other affiliated funds, such participation is subject to numerous conditions. If the Company and the SCP BDCs are unable to comply with these conditions or are otherwise unable to rely on the Order for a particular opportunity, such opportunity will be allocated first to the entity whose investment strategy is the most consistent with the opportunity being allocated, and second, if the terms of the opportunity are consistent with more than one entity’s investment strategy, on an alternating basis. Although SCP will endeavor to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner, the Company could be adversely affected to the extent investment opportunities are allocated among the Company and other investment vehicles managed or sponsored by, or affiliated with SCP and its affiliates, including the SCP BDCs, pursuant to the conditions of the Order.

Regulatory Risks Relating to the Company. Legal and regulatory changes could occur during the term of the Company that may adversely affect the Company. The Company may be subject to, and adversely affected by, new federal, state or non-U.S. laws or new regulation by the SEC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”), the Federal

57

Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), the European Commission and other federal, state and non-U.S. securities or banking regulators, and other governmental regulatory authorities or self-regulatory organizations that supervise the financial markets. The Company may also be adversely affected by changes in the enforcement or interpretation of existing statutes and rules by courts and/or these governmental regulatory authorities or self-regulatory organizations. For example, a recent court decision casts doubt on whether federal or state usury laws apply with respect to loans originated by national banks and then sold to non-bank investors such as the Company; this decision could significantly disrupt the bank loan secondary market and adversely impact the Company’s investment program. In addition, the approach taken by a federal court in the recent “Sun Capital” decision may significantly expand the scope of potential joint and several liability for pension obligations of portfolio companies commonly held by affiliated funds; this decision could create significant uncertainty with respect to such investments and adversely impact the Company. Moreover, legal and regulatory changes may adversely affect the Company’s ability to obtain financing by (among other things) reducing the availability of financing and/or adversely impacting financing costs and other terms.

The financial services industry is subject to extensive regulation. Banking regulators have broad and largely discretionary powers, which include prohibiting “unsafe or unsound” practices; requiring affirmative actions to correct any violation or practice; issuing administrative orders that can be judicially enforced; directing increases in capital; directing the sale of subsidiaries or other assets; limiting dividends and distributions; restricting growth; assessing civil monetary penalties; removing officers and directors; and terminating deposit insurance. These actions and other regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on an investment in the Company. The financial institutions in which the Company will invest and with which the Company will transact are subject to laws, regulations, administrative actions and policies in each location in which they operate. The regulatory environment for private investment funds is evolving, and changes in the regulation or taxation of private investment funds may adversely affect the value of the investments held by the Company and the ability of the Company to execute its investment strategy.

On May 24, 2018, the President of the United States signed into law the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, which increased from $50 billion to $250 billion the asset threshold for designation of “systemically important financial institutions” or “SIFIs” subject to enhanced prudential standards set by the Federal Reserve Board, staggering application of this change based on the size and risk of the covered bank holding company. On May 30, 2018, the Federal Reserve Board voted to consider changes to the Volcker Rule that would loosen compliance requirements for all banks. The effect of this change and any further rules or regulations are and could be complex and far-reaching, and the change and any future laws or regulations or changes thereto could negatively impact the Company’s operations, cash flows or financial condition, impose additional costs on the Company, intensify the regulatory supervision of the Company or otherwise adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, the securities and futures markets are subject to comprehensive statutes, regulations and margin requirements. The SEC and other U.S. and non-U.S. regulators, self-regulatory organizations and exchanges are authorized to take extraordinary actions in the event of market emergencies. The regulation of derivatives transactions and funds that engage in such transactions is an evolving area of law and is subject to modification by government and judicial action. The effect of any future regulatory change on the Company could be substantial and adverse.

Financial Services and Government Intervention. From time to time, certain governments and regulatory authorities, such as the U.S. federal government, the U.S. Federal Reserve and the governments and regulatory authorities of certain member countries of the EU, have taken actions to provide or arrange credit support to financial institutions whose operations have been compromised by credit market dislocations and to restore liquidity and stability to the financial system in such jurisdictions. The implementation of any current or future governmental interventions (which may be significantly altered or terminated prior to implementation or during their terms), and their impact on both the credit markets generally and the Company’s investment program in particular, are uncertain.

58

U.S. Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. In response to the recent disruption in the credit markets and the global economic downturn, various agencies and regulatory bodies of the U.S. federal government have taken or are considering taking various actions. These actions include, but are not limited to, the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), which was signed into law on July 21, 2010, and which imposes a new regulatory framework over the U.S. financial services industry, non-U.S. financial entities that are regulated by or affiliated with entities regulated by U.S. financial regulators, and the consumer credit markets in general, and proposed and final regulations adopted thereunder, as well as proposed and final regulations to implement the Basel III regulatory capital accords. Given the broad scope and sweeping nature of these changes and the fact that certain final implementing rules and regulations have not yet been adopted or implemented, the potential impact of these actions on the Adviser and the Company is unknown, and no assurance can be made that the impact of such changes would not have a material adverse effect on the Adviser or the Company. For example, the U.S. Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”) created by the Dodd-Frank Act has the authority to designate asset management firms as a “systemically important financial institution” (“SIFI”). If the Adviser, or one of its affiliates, were designated as a SIFI, it would be subject to a variety of regulations, including capital requirements and limitations on leverage, which could have a material adverse effect on the ability of the Company to pursue its investment strategy. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act created a new regulator for the credit industry in the U.S. known as the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”). The CFPB may, among other things, regulate interest rates and other charges, require certain disclosures and regulate foreclosure practices. Future regulatory actions authorized by the Dodd-Frank Act (including any regulatory actions or other measures taken by the FSOC and/or the CFPB) may significantly reduce the profitability of the Company and its Portfolio Investments.

Changes to Derivatives Regulation. Through comprehensive new global regulatory regimes impacting derivatives (e.g., the Dodd-Frank Act, European Market Infrastructure Regulation (“EMIR”), Markets in Financial Investments Regulation (“MIFIR”)/Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (“MIFID II”)), certain over-the-counter derivatives transactions in which the Company may engage are either now or will soon be subject to various requirements, such as mandatory central clearing of transactions which include additional margin requirements and in certain cases trading on electronic platforms, pre-and post-trade transparency reporting requirements and mandatory bi-lateral exchange of initial margin for non-cleared swaps. The Dodd-Frank Act also created new categories of regulated market participants, such as “swap dealers,” “security-based swap dealers,” “major swap participants,” and “major security-based swap participants” who are subject to significant new capital, registration, recordkeeping, reporting, disclosure, business conduct and other regulatory requirements. The EU and some other jurisdictions are implementing similar requirements. Because these requirements are new and evolving (and some of the rules are not yet final), their ultimate impact remains unclear. However, even if the Company itself is not located in a particular jurisdiction or directly subject to the jurisdiction’s derivatives regulations, the Company may still be impacted to the extent the Company enters into a derivatives transaction with a regulated market participant or counterparty that is organized in that jurisdiction or otherwise subject to that jurisdiction’s derivatives regulations.

Based on information available as of the date of this report, the effect of such requirements will be likely to (directly or indirectly) increase the Company’s overall costs of entering into derivatives transactions. In particular, new margin requirements, position limits and significantly higher capital charges resulting from new global capital regulations, even if not directly applicable to the Company, may cause an increase in the pricing of derivatives transactions entered into by market participants to whom such requirements apply or affect the overall ability of the Company to enter into derivatives transactions with certain counterparties. Such new global capital regulations and the need to satisfy the various requirements by counterparties are resulting in increased funding costs, increased overall transaction costs, and significantly affecting balance sheets, thereby resulting in changes to financing terms and potentially impacting the Company’s ability to obtain financing. Administrative costs, due to new requirements such as registration, recordkeeping, reporting, and compliance, even if not directly applicable to the Company, may also be reflected in the Company’s derivatives transactions. New requirements to trade certain derivatives transactions on electronic trading platforms and trade reporting requirements may lead to (among other things) fragmentation of the markets, higher transaction costs or reduced

59

availability of derivatives, and/or a reduced ability to hedge, all of which could adversely affect the performance of certain of the Company’s trading strategies. In addition, changes to derivatives regulations may impact the tax and/or accounting treatment of certain derivatives, which could adversely impact the Company.

In November 2020, the SEC adopted new rules regarding the ability of a BDC (or a registered investment company) to use derivatives and other transactions that create future payment or delivery obligations. BDCs that use derivatives will be subject to a value-at-risk leverage limit, certain other derivatives risk management program and testing requirements and requirements related to board reporting. These new requirements would apply unless the BDC qualified as a “limited derivatives user,” as defined in the adopted rules. A BDC that enters into reverse repurchase agreements or similar financing transactions would need to aggregate the amount of indebtedness associated with the reverse repurchase agreements or similar financing transactions could either (i) comply with the asset coverage requirements of Section 18 of the 1940 Act when engaging in reverse repurchase agreements or (ii) choose to treat such agreements as derivative transactions under the adopted rules. Under the adopted rules, a BDC may enter into an unfunded commitment agreement that is not a derivatives transaction, such as an agreement to provide financing to a portfolio company, if the BDC has a reasonable belief, at the time it enters into such an agreement, that it will have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to meet its obligations with respect to all of its unfunded commitment agreements, in each case as it becomes due. If the BDC cannot meet this test, it is required to treat unfunded commitments as a derivatives transaction subject to the requirements of the rule. Collectively, these requirements may limit the Company’s ability to use derivatives and/or enter into certain other financial contracts.

Uncertainty of the U.S. Political Climate. As a result of the November 2020 elections in the United States, the Democratic Party gained control of both the Presidency and the Senate from the Republican Party. Therefore, changes in federal policy, including tax policies, and at regulatory agencies are expected to occur over time through policy and personnel changes, which may lead to changes involving the level of oversight and focus on the financial services industry or the tax rates paid by corporate entities. The nature, timing and economic and political effects of potential changes to the current legal and regulatory framework affecting financial institutions remain highly uncertain. Uncertainty surrounding future changes may adversely affect our operating environment and therefore our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

The Company and its portfolio companies are subject to regulation by laws at the U.S. federal, state and local levels. These laws and regulations, as well as their interpretation, could change from time to time, including as the result of interpretive guidance or other directives from the U.S. President and others in the executive branch, and new laws, regulations and interpretations could also come into effect. Any such new or changed laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, and political uncertainty could increase regulatory uncertainty in the near term.

The effects of legislative and regulatory proposals directed at the financial services industry or affecting taxation, could negatively impact the operations, cash flows or financial condition of the Company or its portfolio companies, impose additional costs on the Company or its portfolio companies, intensify the regulatory supervision of the Company or its portfolio companies or otherwise adversely affect the Company’s business or the business of its portfolio companies. In addition, if the Company does not comply with applicable laws and regulations, the Company could lose any licenses that it then holds for the conduct of business and could be subject to civil fines and criminal penalties.

Over the last several years, there also has been an increase in regulatory attention to the extension of credit outside of the traditional banking sector, raising the possibility that some portion of the non-bank financial sector will be subject to new regulation. While it cannot be known at this time whether any regulation will be implemented or what form it will take, increased regulation of non-bank credit extension could negatively impact the Company’s operations, cash flows or financial condition, impose additional costs on the Company, intensify the regulatory supervision of the Company or otherwise adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

60

Although the Company cannot predict the impact, if any, of these changes to business, they could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows. Until the Company knows what policy changes are made and how those changes impact business and the business of its competitors over the long term, the Company will not know if, overall, it will benefit from them or be negatively affected by them.

“Bad Actor” Restrictions for Private Placements Conducted Under Rule 506 of Regulation D. An issuer is precluded from conducting offerings that rely on the exemption from registration under the 1933 Act provided by Rule 506 of Regulation D (“Rule 506 Offerings”) if a “covered person” of the issuer has been the subject of a “disqualifying event” (each as defined below). “Covered persons” include, among others, the issuer, affiliated issuers, any investment manager or solicitor of the issuer, any director, executive officer or other officer participating in the offering of the issuer, any general partner or managing member of the foregoing entities, any promoter of the issuer and any beneficial owner of 20% or more of the issuer’s outstanding voting equity securities, calculated on the basis of voting power. A “disqualifying event” includes, among other things, certain (a) criminal convictions and court injunctions and restraining orders issued in connection with the purchase or sale of a security or false filings with the SEC, (b) final orders from the CFTC, U.S. Federal banking agencies and certain other regulators that bar a person from associating with a regulated entity or engaging in the business of securities, insurance or banking or that are based on certain fraudulent conduct, (c) SEC disciplinary orders relating to investment advisers, brokers, dealers and their associated persons, (d) SEC cease-and-desist orders relating to violations of certain anti-fraud provisions and registration requirements of the U.S. federal securities laws, (e) suspensions or expulsions from membership in a self-regulatory organization (“SRO”) or from association with an SRO member, and (f) U.S. Postal Service false representation orders.

A disqualification will occur only in the case of a disqualifying event of a covered person that occurs on or after September 23, 2013, although issuers must disclose to potential investors in a Rule 506 Offering disqualifying events of covered persons that occurred before September 23, 2013. The rule provides an exception from disqualification if the issuer can show that it did not know and, in the exercise of reasonable care could not have known, that the issuer or any other covered person had a disqualifying event, although an issuer will not be able to establish that it has exercised reasonable care unless it has made, in light of the circumstances, factual inquiry into whether any disqualifications exist.

The Adviser has made, and on a periodic basis will continue to make, inquiries into whether any persons that the Adviser has determined to be affiliated issuers have been subject to any disqualifying events; however, in some circumstances the Adviser’s ability to determine whether the Company would be disqualified from relying on Rule 506 may depend on cooperation of third parties over whom the Company may have limited control and influence.

If any of the Adviser’s covered persons, including any affiliated issuer of the Company, is subject to a disqualifying event, the Company could lose the ability to raise capital in a future Rule 506 offering for a significant period of time and the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Changes to Accounting Standards. The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Codification Standards and updates, and additional provisions of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) (or to the extent applicable, International Financial Reporting Standards or other applicable accounting or financial reporting standards), that may be adopted in the future may impose additional, or different, specific requirements as to the valuation of assets and liabilities for purposes of U.S. GAAP-compliant financial reporting.

Licensing Requirements. Various licensing requirements could apply to the Company or the Adviser with respect to investments in, or the origination, holding, servicing and disposing of, loans and similar assets. The licensing requirements could apply depending on the location of the borrower, the location of the collateral securing the loan, or the location where the Company or the Adviser operates or has offices. Moreover, the Company’s ability

61

to invest in certain properties, participate in the secondary mortgage market, obtain financing for investments, lease properties to tenants and/or engage in lending, advisory, servicing and/or broker activities may be subject to the issuance of permits or licenses. If the Company applies for such licenses, this process may be costly and take several months. There is no assurance that the Company will obtain all of the licenses that it desires or that the Company would not experience significant delays in seeking these licenses. In states and other jurisdictions in which it is licensed, the Company or the Adviser is required to comply with applicable laws and regulations, including possible information requirements, consumer protection and anti-fraud laws, which could impose restrictions on the Company’s or the Adviser’s ability to take certain actions to protect the value of its investments in such assets and impose compliance costs. Failure to comply with such laws and regulations could lead to, among other penalties, a loss of the Company’s or the Adviser’s license, which in turn could restrict the Company’s investment options or require the Company to divest assets located in or secured by real property located in that jurisdiction. These risks also apply to issuers and entities in which the Company invests that hold similar assets, as well as any origination company or servicer in which the Company owns an interest.

Reporting Company Filing Requirements. As a BDC, the Company is subject to the reporting requirements of the 1934 Act and requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. These requirements may place a strain on systems and resources. The 1934 Act requires that the Company file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to business and financial condition. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that the Company maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting, which are discussed below. In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls, significant resources and management oversight are required. The Company has implemented procedures, processes, policies and practices for the purpose of addressing the standards and requirements applicable to reporting companies. These activities may divert management’s attention from other business concerns, which could have a material adverse effect on business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. The Company expects to incur significant additional annual expenses related to these steps and, among other things, directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, director fees, reporting requirements of the SEC, transfer agent fees, additional administrative expenses payable to the Administrative Coordinator to compensate them for hiring additional accounting, legal and administrative personnel, increased auditing and legal fees and similar expenses.

The systems and resources necessary to comply with public company reporting requirements will increase further once the Company ceases to be an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act. As long as the Company remains an emerging growth company, it intends to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies, including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Company will remain an emerging growth company for up to five years following any future IPO (however, the Company does not anticipate engaging in a public offering of its Units), although if the market value of the Units that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of any June 30 before that time, the Company would cease to be an emerging growth company as of the following December 31.

Additionally, because the Units are registered under the 1934 Act, ownership information for any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of the Units will have to be disclosed in a Schedule 13G or other filings with the SEC. Beneficial ownership for these purposes is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and includes having voting or investment power over the securities. In some circumstances, Unitholders who choose to reinvest their dividends may see their percentage stake in the Company increased to more than 5%, thus triggering this filing requirement. Each Unitholder is responsible for determining their filing obligations and preparing the filings. In addition, Unitholders who hold more than 10% of a class of our units may be subject to Section 16(b) of the 1934 Act, which recaptures for the benefit of the Company profits from the purchase and sale of registered units within a six-month period.

Risks Relating to AIFMD Regulation. The EU Alternative Investment Company Managers Directive (the “AIFMD”) regulates the activities of certain private fund managers undertaking fund management activities or marketing Units to investors within the European Economic Area (“EEA”). To the extent investors domiciled or

62

having their registered office in the EEA participate in the private placement: (i) the Company and the Adviser may be subject to certain reporting, disclosure and other compliance obligations under the AIFMD, which will result in us incurring additional costs and expenses; (ii) the Company and the Adviser may become subject to additional regulatory or compliance obligations arising under national law in certain EEA jurisdictions, which would result in us incurring additional costs and expenses or may otherwise affect management and operation; (iii) the Adviser may be required to make detailed information relating to the Company and its investments available to regulators and third parties; and (iv) the AIFMD may also restrict certain of the Company’s activities in relation to EEA portfolio companies, including, in some circumstances, our ability to recapitalize, refinance or potentially restructure an EEA portfolio company within the first two years of ownership, which may in turn affect operations generally.

In the future, it may be possible for non-EEA alternative investment fund managers (“AIFMs”) to market an alternative investment fund (“AIF”) within the EEA pursuant to a pan-European marketing “passport”, instead of under national private placement regimes. Access to this passport may be subject to the non-EEA AIFM complying with various additional requirements under the AIFMD, which may include one or more of the following: additional conduct of business and organizational requirements; rules relating to the remuneration of certain personnel; minimum regulatory capital requirements; restrictions on the use of leverage; additional disclosure and reporting requirements to both investors and EEA home state regulators; independent valuation of an AIF’s assets; and the appointment of an independent depositary. Certain EEA Member States have indicated that they will cease to operate national private placement regimes when, or shortly after, the passport becomes available, which would mean that non-EEA AIFMs to whom the passport is available would be required to comply with all relevant provisions of the AIFMD in order to market to professional investors in those jurisdictions. As a result, if in the future non-EEA AIFMs may only market in certain EEA jurisdictions pursuant to a passport, the Adviser may not seek to solicit Capital Commitments in those jurisdictions, which may lead to a reduction in the overall amount of Capital Commitments we receive. Alternatively, if the Adviser sought to comply with the requirements to use the passport, this could have adverse effects including, amongst other things, increasing the regulatory burden and costs of operating and managing the Company and its investments, and potentially requiring changes to compensation structures for key personnel, thereby affecting the Adviser’s ability to recruit and retain these personnel.

Documentation of Internal Controls. The Company is obligated to maintain proper and effective internal control over financial reporting, including the internal control evaluation and certification requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“Section 404”). The Company is not required to comply with all of the requirements under Section 404 until the date it is no longer an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act. Accordingly, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting do not currently meet all of the standards contemplated by Section 404 that they will eventually be required to meet. Specifically, the Company is required to conduct annual management assessments of the effectiveness of its internal controls over financial reporting. However, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is not required to formally attest to the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting until the date it is no longer an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act.

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud. Even effective internal controls can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements. If the Company fails to maintain the adequacy of its internal controls, including any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or if the Company experiences difficulties in their implementation, the Company’s business and operating results could be harmed and it could fail to meet its financial reporting obligations.

Other Risks Related to Portfolio Investments

High Yield Debt and Unrated Securities. High yield securities are typically junior to the obligations of companies to senior creditors, trade creditors and employees. High yield securities and unrated securities (which are not rated by a

63

rating agency) may be more susceptible to real or perceived adverse economic and competitive industry conditions than investment-grade securities. A projection of an economic downturn or of a period of rising interest rates, for example, could cause a decline in the prices of high yield securities and unrated securities, because the advent of a recession could lessen the ability of an issuer to make principal and interest payments on its debt obligations. In addition, such securities have historically experienced greater default rates than investment grade securities. The ability of holders of high yield debt to influence a company’s affairs will be substantially less than that of senior creditors, especially during periods of financial distress or following insolvency.

As with other Portfolio Investments, there may not be a liquid market for certain high yield debt which is held by the Company, which could result in the Company being unable to sell such securities for an extended period of time, if at all. In addition, as with other types of Portfolio Investments, the market for high yield debt has historically been subject to disruptions that have caused substantial volatility in the prices of such securities. Consolidation in the financial services industry has resulted in there being fewer market makers for high yield debt, which may result in further risk of illiquidity and volatility with respect to high yield debt held by the Company, and this trend may continue in the future. Furthermore, high yield debt which is held by the Company may not be registered under the Securities Act, and, unless so registered, the Company is not able to sell such high yield debt except pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act. Unrated securities may be less liquid than comparable rated securities and may also involve the risk that the Adviser may not accurately evaluate the security’s comparative credit rating.

Analysis of creditworthiness of issuers of high yield and unrated securities may be more complex than for issuers of higher-quality fixed income securities. Since it is expected that most of the Company’s assets will not be rated by any rating agency or will be rated below investment grade, the Company is more dependent on the Adviser’s creditworthiness analysis than if the Company invested exclusively in higher-quality and rated securities. Securities rated below investment grade are often referred to as “leveraged loans,” “high yield” or “junk” securities, and may be considered “high risk” compared to debt instruments that are rated investment grade. See “—General Credit Risk” above.

Equity-Related Securities. As with other Portfolio Investments, the value of equity or equity-related securities held by the Company may be adversely affected by actual or perceived negative events relating to the issuer of such securities, the industry or geographic areas in which such issuer operates or the financial markets generally. However, equity securities may be even more susceptible to such events given their subordinate position in the issuer’s capital structure. As such, equity securities generally have greater price volatility than fixed income securities, and the market price of equity securities owned by the Company is more susceptible to moving up or down in a rapid or unpredictable manner. In addition, equity securities often lose a significant amount of their value and may become worthless as a result of a bankruptcy proceeding or reorganization.

Convertible Securities Risk. Convertible securities generally offer lower interest or dividend yields than non-convertible debt securities of similar quality. The market values of convertible securities tend to decline as interest rates increase and, conversely, to increase as interest rates decline. However, a convertible security’s market value tends to reflect the market price of the common stock of the issuing company when that stock price approaches or is greater than the convertible security’s “conversion price.” The conversion price is defined as the predetermined price at which the convertible security could be exchanged for the associated stock. As the market price of the underlying common stock declines, the price of the convertible security tends to be influenced more by the yield of the convertible security. Thus, it may not decline in price to the same extent as the underlying common stock. Generally, in the event of a liquidation of the issuing company, holders of convertible securities would be paid before the company’s common stockholders but after holders of any senior debt obligations of the company. Consequently, the issuer’s convertible securities generally entail less risk than its common stock but more risk than its debt obligations. There is also a risk that, under certain circumstances, a bankruptcy court may order that convertible securities are treated as equity.

The Company may invest in synthetic convertible securities, which are created through a combination of separate securities that possess the two principal characteristics of a traditional convertible security, i.e., an income-producing

64

security (“income-producing component”) and the right to acquire an equity security (“convertible component”). The income-producing component is achieved by investing in non-convertible, income-producing securities such as bonds, preferred stocks and money market instruments. The convertible component is achieved by purchasing warrants or options to buy common stock at a certain exercise price, or options on a stock index. The values of synthetic convertible securities will respond differently to market fluctuations than a traditional convertible security because a synthetic convertible is composed of two or more separate securities or instruments, each with its own market value. Synthetic convertible securities are also subject to the risks associated with derivatives. In addition, if the value of the underlying common stock or the level of the index involved in the convertible element falls below the strike price of the warrant or option, the warrant or option may lose all value.

Preferred Securities Risk. In addition to credit risk, investment in preferred stocks involves certain other risks. Certain preferred stocks contain provisions that allow an issuer under certain conditions to skip or defer distributions. If the Company owns preferred stock that is deferring its distribution, the Company may be required to report income for U.S. federal income tax purposes despite the fact that it is not receiving current income on this position. Preferred stock often is subject to legal provisions that allow for redemption in the event of certain tax or legal changes or at the issuer’s call. In the event of redemption, the Company may not be able to reinvest the proceeds at comparable rates of return. Preferred stock is subordinated to bonds and other debt securities in an issuer’s capital structure in terms of priority for corporate income and liquidation payments and, therefore, will be subject to greater credit risk than those debt securities. Preferred stock may trade less frequently and in a more limited volume and may be subject to more abrupt or erratic price movements than many other securities, such as common stocks, corporate debt securities and U.S. government securities.

Forwards and Derivatives Transactions. The Company may engage in a variety of derivatives transactions. A derivative is a financial contract the value of which depends upon, or is derived from, the value of underlying assets, reference rates or indices. Derivatives may relate to securities, interest rates, currencies or currency exchange rates, inflation rates, commodities and related indices, and include foreign currency contracts, swap contracts, options, forward and futures contracts (including options thereon), repurchase or reverse repurchase agreements or other over-the-counter contracts. The Company may use derivatives for many purposes, including as a substitute for direct investment, as a way to adjust its exposure to various securities, markets and currencies without actually having to sell existing investments and/or make new investments, and as a means to hedge other investments and to manage liquidity and excess cash. The Company’s use of derivatives may result in losses, reduce the Company’s return, and/or increase the volatility of the Company (particularly since many derivatives are inherently leveraged), especially in unusual or extreme market conditions.

All derivatives transactions involve risks different from, and potentially greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other more traditional assets, including:

Market Risk. This is the general risk that the value of a particular investment or transaction will change in a way detrimental to the Company’s interests.

Management Risk. Derivatives contracts are specialized contracts that require investment techniques and risk analyses with additional levels of complexity associated with the underlying investments. In addition to risks associated with the underlying instruments, counterparty and unsecured risk (among others) need to be computed and tracked in relation to the Company’s overall risk profile.

Counterparty Risk. With respect to derivatives transactions, estimating counterparty risk exposure entails (among other things) reviewing the current market value of open positions, collateral posted in (or out) against positions, unsettled or failing movements of any cash payments or collateral obligations due from the counterparty and potential replacement cost of positions. When derivatives transactions are collateralized, each party is exposed to the additional risk that its counterparty, clearing broker or the central counterparty does not provide collateral for the mark-to-market of positions in a timely manner. While different derivatives transactions have different counterparty risk characteristics, in general cleared derivatives transactions can have a lower level of counterparty risk, while bilateral OTC derivatives and unsettled transactions can have a more significant level of counterparty risk.

65

Documentation Risk. Many derivatives transactions also have documentation risk. Because contracts for over-the-counter derivatives transactions are individually negotiated with specific counterparties, there exists the risk that the parties may interpret contractual terms (e.g., the definition of default) differently than the Company. If that occurs, the cost and unpredictability of the legal proceedings required for the Company to enforce its contractual rights may lead the Company to decide not to pursue its claims against the counterparty. The Company, therefore, assumes the risk that it may be unable to obtain payments the Adviser believes are owed to it under derivatives transactions, or those payments may be delayed or made only after the Company has incurred the costs of litigation. Also, payment amounts calculated in connection with standard industry conventions for resolving contractual issues (e.g., ISDA Protocols and auction processes) may be different than would be realized if a counterparty were required to comply with the literal terms of the derivatives transaction (e.g., physical delivery). There is little case law interpreting the terms of most derivatives or characterizing their tax treatment.

Regulatory Risk. The derivatives market is subject to various risks related to existing as well as new and evolving regulation both within and outside the U.S. Additional regulation of the derivatives markets may make derivatives more costly, may limit the availability of derivatives, or may otherwise adversely affect the value or performance of derivatives. Any such adverse future developments could impair the effectiveness of a Company’s derivatives transactions and cause the Company to lose value. They may also render certain strategies in which the Company might otherwise engage impossible or so costly that they will no longer be economical to implement. See “—Changes to Derivatives Regulation” above.

Other Risks. Derivatives also involve the risk that changes in their value may not correlate perfectly with the assets, rates or indices they are designed to track. Suitable derivatives may not be available in all circumstances. Under the terms of certain contracts governing derivatives transactions, the occurrence of certain events with respect to the Company (such as a decline in the Company’s NAV) may cause the Company’s derivatives transactions to be terminated early, including at an inopportune time or at an unfavorable price.

Swaps Generally. Swap contracts are two-party contracts entered into primarily by institutional investors for periods ranging from a few weeks to a number of years. Under a typical fixed income swap, one party may agree to pay a fixed or variable amount determined by reference to one or more specified instruments, rates, or indices, multiplied in each case by a specified amount (“notional amount”), while the other party agrees to pay an amount equal to a different rate multiplied by the same notional amount. Other swaps may be used to provide or hedge exposure to other assets, such as stocks, bonds or currencies. The Company may enter into swaps for speculative or hedging purposes. Notional amounts of swap transactions are not subject to any limitations, and swap contracts may expose the Company to unlimited risk of loss. Swaps may be used as an alternative to futures contracts.

Under current law, “swaps” (as defined in Section 1.3 of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “CEA”) and applicable regulations) are regulated by the CFTC, while “security-based swaps” (as defined in Section 1.3 of the CEA and applicable regulations) are regulated by the SEC and “mixed swaps” (as defined in Section 1a of the CEA and applicable regulations) are jointly regulated by the CFTC and SEC. “Swaps” include, but are not limited to, certain foreign exchange and currency swaps, forwards and options, interest rate swaps and options, commodity swaps, and swaps referencing broad-based securities indices. “Security-based swaps” include, but are not limited to, swaps referencing single securities or narrow-based securities indices. These definitions are subject to change. “Mixed swaps” include total return swaps on a single security that also incorporates a foreign exchange hedge and basket swaps that include a narrow-based index of securities and an index or basket of commodities.

Swaps are either subject to a bilateral agreement with a counterparty or are cleared through a central clearing organization. To the extent the Company enters into swaps, forwards, options and other transactions that are not cleared by a central clearing organization, counterparty exposures can develop and the Company takes the risk of nonperformance by the other party on the contract (see “—Counterparty Risk” above). Swaps, futures, options

66

and other instruments that are cleared by a central clearing organization, which generally are supported by guarantees of the clearing organization’s members, daily marking-to-market and settlement and segregation and minimum capital requirements applicable to intermediaries, are subject to different risks, including the creditworthiness of the central clearing organization and its members.

The U.S. government, the EU and certain other jurisdictions have enacted legislation that provides for new regulation of the derivatives market, which could restrict the Company’s ability to engage in swap transactions or increase the cost or uncertainty involved in such transactions.

Interest Rate Swaps. Interest rate swaps typically involve the exchange of the two parties’ respective commitments to pay or receive interest on a notional principal amount (e.g., an exchange of floating rate payments for fixed rate payments). Whether the Company’s use of interest rate swaps will be successful in furthering its investment objective will depend on the Adviser’s ability to predict correctly whether certain types of investments are likely to produce greater returns than other investments. The Company will also bear the risk that the Adviser will not accurately forecast future market trends, reference rates or the values of assets, indexes or other economic factors in establishing interest rate swap positions for the Company. There is no assurance that interest rate swaps will be available for utilization by the Company, or that they will be successful in any of their intended objectives. Any termination of an interest rate swap transaction could also result in a termination payment by or to the Company.

Reverse Repurchase Agreements. The Company may finance certain of its assets through the use of reverse repurchase agreements. Reverse repurchase agreements would involve sales by the Company of certain of its securities or other assets to a counterparty, sometimes at a discounted price (such proceeds representing the loan amount), concurrently with an agreement by the Company to repurchase the same securities or assets from such counterparty at a later date at a price equal to the loan amount plus an interest factor. During the reverse repurchase agreement period, the Company would continue to receive principal and interest payments on the subject securities and assets. Generally, the effect of a reverse repurchase agreement would be that the Company could raise and reinvest during the reverse repurchase agreement period a negotiated percentage of the cash invested in the subject securities and assets, and still be entitled to the returns generated by those securities and assets, thereby giving rise to leverage for the Company.

Reverse repurchase agreements involve the risk that the Adviser will be unable to furnish additional collateral required by counterparties as a result of market movements or otherwise. The cash proceeds received by the Company may be less than or otherwise inconsistent with any internal valuation of the subject assets. To the extent the Company receives a discounted price or “haircut,” it would be under-collateralized with respect to the assets it sold and the “haircut” amount would effectively represent unsecured direct counterparty exposure.

Repurchase Agreements. The Company may engage in repurchase agreements with banks, broker-dealers or other parties. In a repurchase agreement, the Company acquires ownership of a security and the seller agrees to repurchase the obligation at a future time and set price, thereby determining the yield during the holding period. The amount of cash proceeds may not be consistent with any internal valuation of the securities received by the Company. In addition, in the event of the bankruptcy or other default of a seller of a repurchase agreement, the Company could experience both delays in liquidating the underlying securities and losses, including: (i) possible decline in the value of the underlying security during the period while it seeks to enforce its rights thereto, (ii) possible lack of access to income on the underlying security during this period, (iii) expenses of enforcing its rights, and (iv) that the Company may be unable or constrained in its ability to sell the underlying security due to adverse market conditions or other factors.

Structured Notes and Indexed Securities. Structured notes are derivative debt securities, the interest rate or principal of which is determined by an unrelated indicator. Indexed securities include structured notes as well as securities other than debt securities, the interest rate or principal of which is determined by an unrelated indicator. Indexed securities may include a multiplier that multiplies the indexed element by a specified factor

67

and, therefore, the value of such securities may be very volatile. The terms of the structured and indexed securities may provide that in certain circumstances no principal is due at maturity and therefore may result in a loss of invested capital. Structured and indexed securities may be positively or negatively indexed, so that appreciation of the reference may produce an increase or a decrease in the interest rate or the value of the structured or indexed security at maturity may be calculated as a specified multiple of the change in the value of the reference; therefore, the value of such security may be very volatile. Structured and indexed securities may entail a greater degree of market risk than other types of debt securities because the investor bears the risk of the reference. Structured or indexed securities may also be more volatile, less liquid, and more difficult to accurately price than less complex securities or more traditional debt securities. Structured securities also may involve significant credit risk and risk of default by the counterparty.

Forward Contracts. The Company may enter into forward contracts and options thereon which are not traded on exchanges and are generally not regulated. There are no limitations on daily price movements of forward contracts. Banks and other dealers with whom the Company may maintain accounts may require the Company to deposit margin with respect to such trading, although margin requirements are often minimal or nonexistent. The Company’s counterparties are not required to continue to make markets in such contracts and these contracts can experience periods of illiquidity, sometimes of significant duration. There have been periods during which certain counterparties have refused to continue to quote prices for forward contracts or have quoted prices with an unusually wide spread (the difference between the price at which the counterparty is prepared to buy and that at which it is prepared to sell). Arrangements to trade forward contracts may be made with only one or a few counterparties, and liquidity problems therefore might be greater than such arrangements that were made with numerous counterparties. The imposition of credit controls by governmental authorities or the implementation of regulations pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act might limit such forward trading to less than that which the Adviser would otherwise recommend, to the possible detriment of the Company. In addition, disruptions can occur in any market traded by the Company due to unusually high trading volume, political intervention or other factors. Market illiquidity or disruption could result in major losses to the Company. In addition, the Company may be exposed to credit risks with regard to counterparties with whom it trades as well as risks relating to settlement default. Such risks could result in substantial losses to the Company.

Options. The Company may purchase and sell put and call options of any type, including options on securities, indices (both narrow- and broad-based), currencies, swaps, futures and forwards contracts, U.S. government securities, commodities, realized volatility and realized variance. The Company may also invest in auto-hedged options.

The Company may purchase and sell both put and call options in standardized contracts traded on U.S. or non-U.S. securities exchanges, boards of trade, or similar entities, or quoted on NASDAQ or on an over-the-counter market, and agreements, sometimes called cash puts, which may accompany the purchase of a new issue of bonds from a dealer. The Company may write covered straddles consisting of a combination of a call and a put written on the same underlying security.

An option on a security or index is a contract that gives the holder of the option, in return for a premium, the right (but not the obligation) to buy from (in the case of a call) or sell to (in the case of a put) the writer of the option the security underlying the option (or the cash value of the index underlying the option) at a specified price. Purchasing put and call options, as well as writing such options, are highly specialized activities and entail greater than ordinary investment risks. For example, the seller (“writer”) of a put or call option which is uncovered (i.e., the writer has effectively a long or a short position in the underlying security, index, currency or instrument) assumes the risk (which theoretically may be unlimited in the case of a written call option) of a decrease or increase in the market price of the underlying security, index, currency or instrument below or above the sale or purchase price.

Warrants and Rights. The Company may purchase or otherwise receive warrants or rights. Warrants and rights generally give the holder the right to receive, upon exercise, a security of the issuer at a stated price. Risks associated with the use of warrants and rights are generally similar to risks associated with the use of options.

68

Unlike most options, however, warrants and rights are issued in specific amounts, and warrants generally have longer terms than options. Warrants and rights are not likely to be as liquid as exchange-traded options backed by a recognized clearing agency. In addition, the terms of warrants or rights may limit the Company’s ability to exercise the warrants or rights at such time, or in such quantities, as the Company would otherwise wish.

Futures Contracts. A futures contract involves an agreement to buy and sell a specific quantity of an asset at a predetermined price on a future date. In general, futures contracts give rise to risks similar to those associated with derivatives transactions. Prior to exercise or expiration, a futures position typically can be terminated only by entering into an offsetting transaction, which requires a liquid secondary market on the exchange on which the original position was established. If a liquid secondary market does not exist, the Company may be unable (or delayed in its ability to) liquidate a position. Liquidity may also be impacted by “daily price fluctuation limits” (which limit trading to prices within an established range), trading halts, suspensions, exchange or clearing house equipment failures, government intervention, insolvency of a brokerage firm, clearing house or exchange or other disruptions of normal trading activity. The successful use of futures for speculative purposes is subject to the ability to predict correctly movements in the direction of the relevant market, and, to the extent the transaction is entered into for hedging purposes, to ascertain the appropriate correlation between the transaction being hedged and the price movements of the futures contract (see “—Hedging Transactions and Related Risks” above).

Forward Commitments and “When-Issued” Transactions. The Company may purchase and sell securities or other instruments on a “when-issued” and “delayed delivery” basis. The payment obligation and the interest rate receivable on a forward commitment, delayed delivery or when-issued security are fixed when the Company enters into the commitment, but the Company does not make payment until it receives delivery from the counterparty. No income accrues to the Company on such securities in purchase transactions prior to the date the Company actually takes delivery of the securities.

When purchasing or otherwise receiving a security on a when-issued, delayed delivery, or forward commitment basis, the Company assumes the rights and risks of ownership of the security, including the risk of price and yield fluctuations. When the Company sells a security on a when-issued, delayed delivery, or forward commitment basis, the Company does not participate in future gains or losses with respect to the security. If the other party to a transaction fails to deliver or pay for the securities, the Company could miss a favorable price or yield opportunity or could suffer a loss.

Risks Relating to Reference Rates. LIBOR, the London Interbank Offered Rate, is the basic rate of interest used in lending transactions between banks on the London interbank market and is widely used as a reference for setting the interest rate on loans globally.

In the recent past, concerns have been publicized that some of the member banks surveyed by the British Bankers’ Association (“BBA”) in connection with the calculation of LIBOR across a range of maturities and currencies may have been under-reporting or otherwise manipulating the inter-bank lending rate applicable to them in order to profit on their derivative positions or to avoid an appearance of capital insufficiency or adverse reputational or other consequences that may have resulted from reporting inter-bank lending rates higher than those they actually submitted. A number of BBA member banks entered into settlements with their regulators and law enforcement agencies with respect to alleged manipulation of LIBOR, and investigations by regulators and governmental authorities in various jurisdictions are ongoing.

Actions by the ICE Benchmark Administration, regulators or law enforcement agencies as a result of these or future events, may result in changes to the manner in which LIBOR is determined. Potential changes, or uncertainty related to such potential changes may adversely affect the market for LIBOR-based securities. In addition, any further changes or reforms to the determination or supervision of LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR, which could have an adverse impact on the market for LIBOR-based securities or the value of any LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt securities, loans, and other financial obligations in the Company’s portfolio or extensions of credit held by or due to the Company.

69

On July 27, 2017, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”), which regulates LIBOR, announced that it intends to stop persuading or compelling banks to submit LIBOR rates after 2021. In addition, on March 25, 2020, the FCA stated that although the central assumption that firms cannot rely on LIBOR being published after the end of 2021 has not changed, the outbreak of COVID-19 has impacted the timing of many firms’ transition planning, and the FCA will continue to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on transition timelines and update the marketplace as soon as possible. Furthermore, on November 30, 2020, the Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (“ICE”) announced that the ICE Benchmark Administration Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of ICE and the administrator of LIBOR, announced its plan to extend the date that most U.S. LIBOR values would cease being computed and announced from December 31, 2021 to June 30, 2023. Despite this extension of the U.S. LIBOR transition deadline for certain LIBOR values, U.S. regulators continue to urge financial institutions to stop entering into new LIBOR transactions by the end of 2021. It is unclear if after 2021 LIBOR will cease to exist or if new methods of calculating LIBOR will be established such that it continues to exist after 2021. It is also unclear whether the COVID-19 pandemic will have further effect on LIBOR transition plans.

In the United States, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, in conjunction with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, a steering committee comprised of large U.S. financial institutions, is considering replacing U.S. dollar LIBOR with a new index calculated by short-term repurchase agreements, backed by Treasury securities called the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”). The Federal Reserve Bank of New York began publishing SOFR in April 2018. Whether or not SOFR attains market traction as a LIBOR replacement remains a question and the future of LIBOR at this time is uncertain, including whether the COVID-19 pandemic will have further effect on LIBOR transition plans. The elimination of LIBOR or any other changes or reforms to the determination or supervision of LIBOR could have an adverse impact on the market for or value of any LIBOR-linked securities, loans, and other financial obligations or extensions or credit held by or due to the Company or on the Company’s overall financial condition or results of operations.

Risks Related to Stressed and Distressed Investments. The Company may invest, on an active or opportunistic basis, in bonds, loans, notes and other obligations and securities, including derivatives relating to any of the foregoing, of issuers experiencing, or expected to experience, financial stress or distress, which may include supporting and/or participating in the provision of debtor-in-possession or rescue loans. Such Portfolio Investments may trade significantly below par, are considered speculative, and entail substantial inherent risks (which are generally significantly higher than the risks involved in investing in other companies). In particular, defaulted obligations might be repaid, if at all, only after lengthy workout or bankruptcy proceedings, during which the issuer might not receive, or even accrue, any interest or other payments; the amount of any recovery may be affected by the relative security of the Company’s investment in the issuer’s capital structure; and the recovery could be in the form of instruments or interests different from the instrument or interest providing the basis for the claim and on terms that may differ from prevailing market terms for similar instruments or interests. In addition, such Portfolio Investments are more likely to be challenged as fraudulent conveyances, and amounts paid on the Portfolio Investments may be subject to avoidance as a preference under certain circumstances. See “—Fraudulent Conveyance and Preference Considerations” and “—Risks Associated with Bankruptcy and Insolvency Cases” below.

Risks Related to Economic Recessions. Many of our portfolio companies may be susceptible to economic slowdowns or recessions and may be unable to repay our loans during these periods. The global outbreak of COVID-19 has disrupted economic markets, and the prolonged economic impact is uncertain. Many manufacturers of goods have seen a downturn in production due to the suspension of business and temporary closure of factories globally in an attempt to curb the continued spread of the virus. As a result of these disruptions, our non-performing assets may increase and the value of our portfolio may decrease during these periods as we are required to record the values of our investments. Adverse economic conditions also may decrease the value of collateral securing some of our loans and the value of our equity investments at fair value. Economic slowdowns or recessions could lead to financial losses in our portfolio and a decrease in revenues, net income and assets. Unfavorable economic conditions also could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us. These events could prevent us

70

from increasing investments and result in our receipt of a reduced level of interest income from our portfolio companies and/or losses or charge offs related to our investments, and, in turn, may adversely affect distributable income and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

A portfolio company’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, acceleration of the time when the loans are due and foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize the portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt that we hold. We may incur additional expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms with a defaulting portfolio company. In addition, if one of our portfolio companies were to go bankrupt, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we actually provided significant managerial assistance to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might re-characterize our debt holdings and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to that of other creditors.

These portfolio companies may face intense competition, including competition from companies with greater financial resources, more extensive research and development, manufacturing, marketing and service capabilities and greater number of qualified and experienced managerial and technical personnel. They may need additional financing that they are unable to secure and that we are unable or unwilling to provide, or they may be subject to adverse developments unrelated to the technologies they acquire.

Our business is directly influenced by the economic cycle, and could be negatively impacted by a downturn in economic activity in the U.S. as well as globally. Fiscal and monetary actions taken by U.S. and non-U.S. government and regulatory authorities could have a material adverse impact on our business. To the extent uncertainty regarding the U.S. or global economy negatively impacts consumer confidence and consumer credit factors, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. Moreover, Federal Reserve policy, including with respect to certain interest rates and the decision to end its quantitative easing policy, along with the general policies of the current Presidential administration, may also adversely affect the value, volatility and liquidity of dividend- and interest-paying securities. Market volatility, rising interest rates and/or a return to unfavorable economic conditions could adversely affect our business.

Risks Related to Portfolio Investment Monitoring and Involvement. The Company’s Portfolio Investments will require active monitoring and may, at times, involve participation in business strategy or reorganization proceedings. See “—Control Positions” below. The Company’s investment program may from time to time enable it to place representatives on the creditors’ or steering committees and/or the boards of directors of certain companies in which it has invested. While such involvement may enable the Adviser to enhance the value of the Company’s Portfolio Investments, it may also prevent the Company from freely disposing of such Portfolio Investments, while also exposing it to legal claims and adverse publicity (including claims of breach of duty of loyalty, securities claims and other management-related claims). In addition, if the Adviser’s representatives are serving as directors of companies which are in the “zone of insolvency,” such persons may have a fiduciary obligation to the creditors of such entity as well as the shareholders of such entity. The interests of such parties may be adverse to the interests of the Company. These fiduciary obligations may conflict with the Adviser’s obligation to the Company, and the Adviser may cause its representatives to resign from such positions in order to reduce such conflicts. Any involvement by the Adviser’s representatives (including through serving on a board of directors, or permanent or ad hoc creditors’ or steering committees) may also entail a substantial time commitment, which may limit such representatives’ ability to participate in other Company matters and investments.

Risks Associated with Bankruptcy and Insolvency Cases. If any issuers of securities held by the Company or any counterparties to the derivatives transactions and other transactions entered into by the Company, or any custodians of the Company’s assets or any obligors in connection with Portfolio Investments are involved in bankruptcy proceedings, the Company will be subject to certain risks inherent in bankruptcy proceedings, including the duration, administrative costs and impact of a bankruptcy case on the value of assets administered in bankruptcy or on a company’s value (including that a bankruptcy case may damage or diminish a company’s relationship with its employees, customers and/or suppliers). Many of the events within a bankruptcy or insolvency case are adversarial and

71

often beyond the control of the creditors. While creditors generally are afforded an opportunity to object to significant actions, or to demand that certain actions take place, there can be no assurance that a court would not approve actions or inaction which may be contrary to the interests of the Company.

Generally, the duration of a bankruptcy or insolvency case can only be roughly estimated. The reorganization of a company usually involves the design of a business plan, the development and negotiation of a plan of reorganization, plan approval by creditors and confirmation by the court. This process can involve substantial legal, professional and administrative costs to the company and to the Company; it is subject to unpredictable and lengthy delays; and during the process the company’s competitive position may erode, key management may depart and the company may not be able to invest adequately. In some cases, the company may not be able to reorganize and may be required to liquidate assets. In addition, the debt of companies in financial reorganization may, in some cases, not pay current interest and other charges, may not even accrue interest and other charges during reorganization, may be relieved of paying pre-payment premiums and may be adversely affected by an erosion of the issuer’s fundamental value. Further, a debtor seeking to reorganize under U.S. federal bankruptcy law will frequently obtain a “first day” order from the bankruptcy court limiting trading in claims against, and shares of, the debtor in order to maximize the debtor’s ability to utilize net operating losses following a successful reorganization.

During the pendency of a bankruptcy case, an automatic stay will prevent all creditors from taking action against the debtor to foreclose on collateral or otherwise to collect on amounts owed to such creditors. Unless a creditor’s claim in such case is secured by assets having a value in excess of such claim, or the bankruptcy estate is determined to be solvent, no interest will be permitted to accrue and, therefore, a creditor’s return on investment can be adversely affected by the passage of time during which the plan of reorganization of the debtor is being negotiated, approved by the creditors and confirmed by the bankruptcy court.

The priority of perfected liens held by secured creditors as of the commencement of the bankruptcy case is typically recognized in a bankruptcy case, unless avoided. Occasionally, however, a court will allow a debtor-in-possession financing to receive liens that prime pre-existing, valid liens.

The administrative costs in connection with a bankruptcy case are frequently high and will generally be paid out of the debtor’s estate prior to any return to creditors (other than out of assets or proceeds thereof which are subject to valid and enforceable liens and other security interests) and equity holders. In addition, certain unsecured claims that have priority by law over the claims of certain creditors (for example, claims arising post-petition and certain claims for taxes) may be quite high.

U.S. bankruptcy law permits the classification of “substantially similar” claims in determining the classification of claims in a reorganization for the purpose of voting on a plan of reorganization. Because the standard for classification is vague, there exists a significant risk that the Company’s influence with respect to a class of securities can be lost by the inflation of the number and the amount of claims in, or other gerrymandering of, the class.

Although a creditor is not typically compelled to release direct claims it may have against non-debtor third parties, in certain circumstances a court may compel such release in the context of a plan of reorganization.

Claims in bankruptcy cases are often paid at less than par and, depending on the debtor’s assets and liabilities, there may be no recovery at all for some classes of creditors. The claims of even over-secured secured creditors are often paid out over time, and may receive debt securities that will trade below par. Initially, only the debtor may file a proposed plan of reorganization. While the U.S. Bankruptcy Code permits other parties-in-interest to file proposed plans of reorganization after the debtors’ “exclusive period” to do so ends, bankruptcy courts often extend the debtor’s exclusive period, which effectively permits only the debtor to file a proposed reorganization plan. While creditors can vote on the plan of reorganization, the unanimous consent of all creditor classes is not necessarily required for the bankruptcy court to confirm the plan. Therefore, a plan can, subject to the provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, be “crammed down” on dissenting classes of creditors. Moreover, minority members of a class may be deemed to be members of an accepting class if the requisite majority vote is acquired.

72

Even if a class of claims is entitled to a recovery in a reorganization or liquidation proceeding, such recovery could be in the form of instruments or interests different from the form of instrument or interest which formed the basis for the claim, including debt securities, equity securities, convertible securities, warrants, options, cash, interests in litigation claims or trusts formed to pursue such litigation claims, interests in liquidation trusts, or other property or interests, any of which could be illiquid and/or difficult to value. Furthermore, the terms of instruments or interests distributed in a bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding may differ from prevailing market terms for similar instruments or interests, and may have a market value of less than par.

The Company may be presented with the opportunity to make new investments in connection with the reorganization or liquidation of an issuer of Portfolio Investments, including, without limitation, through a rights offering, litigation financing, bridge financing or other exit financing. The Company may make such investments as part of an in-court or out-of-court restructuring of an issuer of Portfolio Investments, and any such investment will be subject to the same risks as other Portfolio Investments of the Company.

Contractual subordination provisions are enforceable when a borrower is in bankruptcy, as are most inter-creditor agreement terms. Furthermore, there are instances where creditors and equity holders may lose their ranking and priority when they take over management and functional operating control of a debtor. In those cases where the Company, by virtue of such action, is found to exercise “domination and control” of a debtor, the Company may lose its priority if the debtor or other creditors can demonstrate that the debtor’s business was adversely impacted or other creditors and/or equity holders were harmed by improper or unfair actions of the Company, whether or not the Company is found to be a controlling party of the debtor. In addition, loans extended to a financially distressed borrower by an entity that owns an equity interest in the borrower may be reclassified as having been an equity capital contribution, rather than a debt obligation.

Notwithstanding the corporate structure of various debtor entities, such as special purpose entities created to hold assets and to structure for bankruptcy remoteness, such entities may, in certain cases, be consolidated in bankruptcy proceedings, which can affect the outcome of such proceedings and the amounts ultimately received by creditors. In addition, if a claim can be asserted against only a parent holding entity, such claim may be structurally subordinated to claims against a subsidiary entity that owns assets.

The U.S. Bankruptcy Code and other laws and regulations affecting debtors’ and creditors’ rights are subject to change, including by way of legislative action or judicial interpretation. The U.S. Bankruptcy Code and other laws and regulations affecting debtors’ and creditors’ rights are subject to change, including by way of legislative action or judicial interpretation. In addition, governmental actors have recently shown a willingness to intervene in bankruptcy-related matters (for example, the U.S. government’s bailouts of General Motors and Chrysler), which may increase uncertainty regarding the enforcement of creditors’ rights and the bankruptcy process generally. Any such actions could alter the expected outcome or introduce greater uncertainty regarding the expected outcome of an investment situation of the Company, which may adversely affect such investment or the Company’s investment program.

Lack of Control over Investments. The Company expects to invest in debt securities, but may hold a non-controlling interest in one or more Portfolio Investments. Such investments may not give the Company the ability to influence the management of the company or to elect a representative to the Board. In addition, the management of the company or its shareholders may have economic or business interests which are inconsistent with those of the Company, and they may be in a position to take action contrary to the Company’s objectives. A non-controlling interest may be especially adverse to the Company in circumstances, such as certain stressed or distressed situations, where an element of control or influence might be beneficial to the subject investment.

Control Positions. The Company does not expect to, but may have a controlling interest in a Portfolio Investment (because of its equity ownership, representation on the board of directors and/or contractual rights) either on its own or, in certain cases, with another financial partner or investment fund (e.g., in accordance with the Company’s receipt of equity in connection with a restructuring). The exercise of control over a company may

73

impose additional risks of liability for environmental damage, product defects, failure to supervise management, pension and other fringe benefits, violation of governmental regulations (including securities laws) or other types of related liability. If these liabilities were to arise, the Company might suffer a significant loss in such investment. In addition, if employees of the Adviser serve as directors of certain of the Portfolio Investments, including public companies, they will have duties to persons other than the Company.

To the extent that the Company owns a controlling stake in or is deemed an affiliate of a particular company, it may also be subject to certain additional bankruptcy or securities laws restrictions that could affect both the liquidity of the Company’s interest and the Company’s ability to liquidate its interest without adversely impacting the price thereof, including insider trading restrictions, the affiliate sale restrictions of Rule 144 of the Securities Act and the disclosure requirements of Sections 13 and 16 of the 1934 Act. Further, to the extent that affiliates of the Company or the Adviser are subject to such restrictions, the Company, by virtue of its affiliation with such entities, may be similarly restricted, regardless of whether the Company stands to benefit from such affiliate’s ownership.

If the Company, alone or as part of a group acting together for certain purposes, becomes the beneficial owner of more than 10% of certain classes of securities of a U.S. public company or places a director on the board of directors of such a company, the Company may be subject to certain additional reporting requirements and to liability for short-swing profits under Section 16 of the 1934 Act. Furthermore, the Company may also be subject to similar reporting requirements and other limitations in non-U.S. jurisdictions where it holds significant positions in companies in such jurisdictions.

The exercise of control over a company, depending upon the amount and type of securities owned by the Company, contractual arrangements between the company and the Company, and other relevant factual circumstances, could result in an extension to one year of the 90-day bankruptcy preference period with respect to payments made to the Company. The exercise of control over a company may also provide grounds for challenges to the priority and enforceability of Portfolio Investments or other claims the Company may have against the company if it is subject to a bankruptcy case or other insolvency proceeding. See “—Lender Liability Considerations and Equitable Subordination” below.

Lender Liability Considerations and Equitable Subordination. In recent years, a number of judicial decisions in the U.S. have upheld the right of borrowers to sue lending institutions on the basis of various evolving legal theories (collectively termed “lender liability”). Generally, lender liability is founded upon the premise that an institutional lender has violated a duty (whether implied or contractual) of good faith and fair dealing owed to the borrower or has assumed a degree of control over the borrower resulting in creation of a fiduciary duty owed to the borrower or its other creditors or shareholders. In addition, courts have in some cases applied the doctrine of equitable subordination to subordinate the claim against a borrower of a creditor, including a lending institution, to claims of other creditors of the borrower when the creditor is found to have engaged in unfair, inequitable or fraudulent conduct. There can be no assurance as to whether any fund, lending institution or other party from which the Company may directly or indirectly acquire such claims engaged in any such conduct and, if it did, as to whether the Company would be subject to claims that the Company’s Portfolio Investments should be equitably subordinated based on such conduct. Because of the nature of certain of the Company’s Portfolio Investments, the Company could be subject to allegations of lender liability or to claims that the Company’s Portfolio Investments should be equitably subordinated.

Fraudulent Conveyance and Preference Considerations. Various federal and state laws enacted for the protection of creditors may apply to the purchase of the Company’s Portfolio Investments, or payments or liens related thereto, by virtue of the Company’s role as a creditor with respect to the borrowers under such Portfolio Investments. If a court, in a lawsuit brought by an unpaid creditor, a debtor-in-possession, a trustee in bankruptcy, or their respective representatives, were to find that the borrower took any action to intentionally delay or frustrate recoveries by creditors, or did not receive fair consideration or reasonably equivalent value for incurring indebtedness evidenced by an investment and the grant of any security interest or other lien securing such investment, and, after giving effect to such

74

indebtedness and/or grant of any security interest or other lien, the issuer or obligor (i) was insolvent, (ii) was engaged in a business for which the remaining assets of such issuer constituted unreasonably small capital or (iii) intended to incur, or believed that it would incur, debts beyond its ability to pay such debts as they mature, such court could, under certain circumstances, invalidate, in whole or in part, such indebtedness and such security interest or other lien as fraudulent conveyances, could subordinate such indebtedness to existing or future creditors of the borrower and could allow the borrower to recover amounts previously paid by the borrower to the creditor (including to the Company) in satisfaction of such indebtedness or proceeds of such security interest or other lien previously applied in satisfaction of such indebtedness.

The measure of insolvency for purposes of the foregoing will vary. Generally, an issuer or obligor would be considered insolvent at a particular time if the sum of its debts were then greater than all of its property at a fair valuation, or if the present fair saleable value of its assets were less than the amount that would be required to pay its probable liabilities on its existing debts as they became absolute and matured. There can be no assurance as to what standard a court would apply in order to determine whether the issuer or obligor was “insolvent” after giving effect to the incurrence of the indebtedness and/or the granting of any security interest or other lien or that, regardless of the method of valuation, a court would not determine that the issuer was “insolvent” upon giving effect to such incurrence of indebtedness and/or grant of security interests or other lien.

The Company may invest in bank debt or other indebtedness issued by a borrower which is guaranteed by other entities within the borrower’s corporate family. In such circumstances, the borrower often has little or no assets other than the stock of its subsidiaries and, as a result, any recovery is often available only, if at all, from the entities that guaranteed the indebtedness. There is a risk, however, that the obligations of such guarantors and any security interests or other liens issued by the guarantors to secure such obligations may be avoided as fraudulent conveyances in the event that a court were to determine that such guarantors did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the issuance of the guarantees and for the security interests or other liens. A court could determine that the guarantors did not receive reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration in incurring the obligations and granting the security interests or other liens despite the existence of “indirect” benefits to the guarantors, such as the strengthening of the corporate enterprise in the transaction. Additionally, provisions in guarantees and other similar documents governing similar obligations by which fraudulent conveyance exposure is sought to be reduced or eliminated, such as so-called “savings clauses,” may not be enforceable. As a result, the Company’s Portfolio Investment in corporate bank debt or other indebtedness could be subject to avoidance as a fraudulent conveyance.

If a transaction is found to have been a fraudulent conveyance, the transferee may be compelled to return the value of the assets transferred as of the time of the transfer, even if the then current value is substantially less. In addition, unless the transferee is deemed to be a “good faith” transferee, the return of the asset may not even provide for the compensation back to the transferee of the value paid to the transferor.

In addition, in the event of the insolvency (as determined by a court based on the law of the jurisdiction which is being applied) of an issuer of a Portfolio Investment, payments made on the Company’s Portfolio Investment, or new liens granted, could be subject to avoidance as a “preference” if made within a certain period of time (which may be as long as one year) before insolvency, depending on a number of factors.

In general, if payments on a Company’s Portfolio Investment are avoidable, whether as a fraudulent conveyance or preference, such payments can be recaptured either from the initial recipient (such as the Company) or from subsequent transferees of such payments, including Unitholders. Additionally, if the grant of a security interest or other lien is avoidable, whether as a fraudulent conveyance or preference, the value of the security interest or other lien can be recovered from the initial transferee or the entity for whose benefit such transfer was made (such as the Company), and such recovery could include the diminution in value of the property which was subject to the security interest or other lien from the date of transfer.

There can be no assurance that a successful cause of action for fraudulent conveyance or preference will not occur, or as to whether any fund, lending institution or other party from which the Company may directly or

75

indirectly acquire a Portfolio Investment engaged in any conduct to give rise to such causes of action, and if it did, as to whether such causes of action could be asserted against the Company and/or the Unitholders.

Risks Associated with Non-U.S. Bankruptcy and Insolvency Laws. Portfolio Investments may include securities or obligations collateralized by assets located outside of the U.S., or of issuers organized under the laws of jurisdictions other than the U.S. Similarly, issuers of securities constituting Portfolio Investments may have a principal place of business or substantial assets located outside of the U.S. As a result, such securities or obligations may be subject to bankruptcy or insolvency laws of non-U.S. jurisdictions. These laws may be substantially less favorable to creditors than the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

Portfolio Investment Risk. The Company’s Portfolio Investments (some of which are expected to be in stressed and distressed companies or represent “special situations”) may involve a high degree of business and financial risk. See “—Risks Related to Stressed and Distressed Investments” above and “—‘Special Situation’ Investment Risks” below. Portfolio Investments may be in early stages of development, may have operating losses or significant variations in operating results and may be engaged in rapidly changing businesses with products subject to a substantial risk of obsolescence. Portfolio Investments will also include companies that are experiencing or are expected to experience financial difficulties, which may never be overcome. In addition, many of them will have weak financial conditions and may require substantial additional capital to support their operations, to finance expansion or to maintain their competitive positions. Portfolio Investments may face intense competition, including competition from companies with greater financial resources, more extensive development, manufacturing, marketing, and other capabilities and a larger number of qualified managerial and technical personnel. In addition, Portfolio Investments in which the Company expects to invest may be required to comply with numerous U.S. and non-U.S. statutory and regulatory standards. A Portfolio Investment could be materially and adversely affected as a result of statutory or regulatory changes or changes in judicial or administrative interpretations of existing laws and regulations that impose more comprehensive or stringent requirements on such Portfolio Investment, the markets in which such Portfolio Investment operates or such Portfolio Investment’s industry generally.

There can be no assurance that a Portfolio Investment’s management team will be able to operate such Portfolio Investment successfully. In addition, instances of fraud or other illegal practices committed by the management team of a Portfolio Investment may undermine the Company’s investment in such Portfolio Investment and the Company may suffer losses. Additionally, Portfolio Investments need to attract, retain and develop executives and members of their management teams. There can be no assurance that a Portfolio Investment will be able to attract and develop suitable members of its management team, which may adversely affect the Company.

“Special Situation” Investment Risks. The Company may make investments in “special situations,” including recapitalizations, spinoffs, corporate and financial restructurings, acquiring or otherwise taking control of a pooled investment vehicle or its assets, litigation or other catalyst-orientated situations. Such investments are often difficult to analyze. In any such investment opportunity, there exists the risk that the relevant transaction either will be unsuccessful, will take considerable time or will result in a distribution of cash or a new security, the value of which will be less than the purchase price to the Company of the security or other financial instrument in respect of which such distribution is received. Similarly, if an anticipated catalyst produces an unanticipated result or does not in fact occur, the Company may choose to sell the Portfolio Investment at a loss or hold the Portfolio Investment and ultimately recover less than the amount of its initial investment. Any risk management strategies employed cannot fully insulate the Company from the risks inherent in its planned activities. Moreover, in certain situations, the Company may be unable to, or may choose not to, implement risk management strategies because of the costs involved or other relevant circumstances.

Zero-Coupon Bonds, Deferred Interest Rate Bonds and Payment-In-Kind Securities. Zero-coupon bonds pay interest only at maturity rather than at intervals during the life of the security. Deferred interest rate bonds generally provide for a period of delay before the regular payment of interest begins. PIK securities are debt obligations that pay “interest” in the form of other debt obligations, instead of in cash. Each of these instruments

76

is normally issued and traded at a deep discount from face value. Zero-coupon bonds, deferred interest rate bonds and PIKs allow an issuer to avoid or delay the need to generate cash to meet current interest payments and, as a result, may involve greater credit risk than bonds that pay interest currently or in cash. In addition, such investments experience greater volatility in market value due to changes in interest rates than debt obligations that provide for regular payments of interest.

Money Market and Other Liquid Instruments. The Company may invest its assets in such liquid securities as the Adviser may deem to be advisable, including fixed income securities, money market instruments, money market mutual funds, and debt securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S., certain U.S. government agencies or instrumentalities. Money market instruments are short-term fixed income obligations, which generally have remaining maturities of one year or less, and may include commercial paper, certificates of deposit, and bankers’ acceptances issued by domestic branches of U.S. banks that are members of the FDIC. The Company may be prevented from achieving its investment objective during any period in which its assets are not substantially invested in accordance with its investment strategy. Notwithstanding their general high-quality nature, money market funds and liquid securities are subject to the risk of loss.

Among other liquid investments, the Company may invest cash, pending investment, reinvestment or distribution thereof or in connection with the maintenance of reserves, in money fund products offered from time to time by its Custodian, including the use of bank “sweep” short-term offerings.

Pooled Investment Vehicles and Pass-through Entities. The Company may invest or take short positions in pooled investment vehicle and pass-through entities, including affiliated or third-party unregistered investment vehicles, investment companies registered under the 1940 Act (including exchange-traded funds and closed-end companies) and master limited partnerships (“Pooled Investment Vehicles”). To the extent the Company invests directly in Pooled Investment Vehicles and other “pass-through” entities which are treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income taxation purposes, the Company must rely on such vehicles to deliver to it certain tax information that is necessary to complete the Company’s own tax returns. If this information is not delivered to the Company in a timely fashion, the Company will be delayed in providing tax information to the investors.

U.S. Government and Agency Securities. The Company may invest in debt securities issued or guaranteed by certain U.S. government agencies, instrumentalities and sponsored enterprises. Some U.S. government securities, such as Treasury bills, notes and bonds and MBS guaranteed by Ginnie Mae, are supported by the full faith and credit of the U.S.; others are supported by the right of the issuer to borrow from the U.S. Treasury; others are supported by the discretionary authority of the U.S. government to purchase the agency’s obligations; and still others are supported only by the credit of the instrumentality. Although U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, may be chartered or sponsored by Congress, they are not funded by Congressional appropriations, and their securities are not issued by the U.S. Treasury or supported by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government and involve increased credit risks. In addition, certain governmental entities have been subject to regulatory scrutiny regarding their accounting policies and practices and other concerns that may result in legislation, changes in regulatory oversight and/or other consequences that could adversely affect the credit quality, availability or investment character of securities issued by these entities.

Restricted Securities. It is expected that a significant portion of the Company’s Portfolio Investments will be securities (“restricted securities”) that have not been registered for sale to the public under the Securities Act pursuant to an exemption from registration (including Section 4(a)(2) of, or Rule 144A under, the Securities Act). Restricted securities are generally only sold to institutional investors in private sales from the issuer or from an affiliate of the issuer. These securities may be less liquid than securities registered for sale to the general public. The liquidity of a restricted security may be affected by a number of factors, including: (i) the credit quality of the issuer; (ii) the frequency of trades and quotes for the security; (iii) the number of dealers willing to purchase or sell the security and the number of other potential purchasers; (iv) dealer undertakings to make a market in the security; and (v) the nature of the security and the nature of marketplace trades. Also, restricted securities may be difficult to value because market quotations may not be readily available.

77

In addition, a debtor in a reorganization case may be granted a trading restriction order by a bankruptcy court in order to protect such debtor’s net operating losses (a “NOL Order”). Such an order may prohibit or severely restrict the ability of some creditors to sell their claims and interests in the debtor. The Company’s ability to transfer its interests in such a debtor may be impaired, delayed or prohibited as a consequence of a NOL Order. The Company may also incur added expenses if it attempts to challenge or limit the scope of a NOL Order, and such an attempt may not be successful. Similarly, issuers with net operating losses sometimes adopt Unitholder rights plans or similar arrangements in order to preserve the ability to utilize such net operating losses in the future; any such actions could also limit or otherwise adversely impact the Company’s ability to transfer or dispose of its interests in any such issuer.

Risks Related to Disposition of Investments. The Company may dispose of its investments through whatever manner it deems to be advisable, including through asset sales, repackaging transactions, securitizations, initial public offerings, strategic transactions and other mergers and acquisitions activity, and/or any combination thereof. Therefore, the disposition of Company investments will be subject to the risks associated with the particular exit strategy utilized. See, for example, “—Risks Relating to Bank Loans and Corporate Loans” above. In particular, certain disposition techniques and structures may expose the Company to liability for (among other things) securities laws violations, breaches of representations and warranties, and repurchase or “putback” obligations with respect to securitizations or similar structures.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

Our executive offices are located at 500 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10022, and are provided by SCP in accordance with the terms of the Investment Management Agreement. We believe that our office facilities are suitable and adequate for our business as it is presently conducted.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Neither we nor the Adviser are currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, is any material legal proceeding threatened against us or the Adviser. From time to time, we or the Adviser may be a party to certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings relating to the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. Our business is also subject to extensive regulation, which may result in regulatory proceedings against us. While the outcome of these legal or regulatory proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect upon our financial condition or results of operations.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

78

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

Units will only be sold (i) in the U.S. only to U.S. persons who are “accredited investors” within the meaning of Regulation D under the 1933 Act and (ii) outside the U.S. in accordance with Regulation S under the 1933 Act. There is no public market for our Units, and none is expected to develop. For this reason, the Company is not providing the performance graph required by Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K.

Because Units are being acquired by investors in one or more transactions “not involving a public offering,” they are “restricted securities” and may be required to be held indefinitely. Our Units may not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged or otherwise disposed of unless (i) our written consent is granted, and (ii) the Units are registered under applicable securities laws or specifically exempted from registration (in which case the unitholder may, at our option, be required to provide us with a legal opinion, in form and substance satisfactory to us, that registration is not required). We do not anticipate consenting to sales, transfers or assignments of Units. Accordingly, an investor must be willing to bear the economic risk of investment in the Units until we are liquidated. No sale, transfer, assignment, pledge or other disposition, whether voluntary or involuntary, of the Units may be made without our written consent.

Holders

As of February 22, 2021, there was 1 holder of record of our Units.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None, other than those already disclosed in certain Form 8-Ks filed with the SEC.

Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities

None.

Distributions

Tax characteristics of all distributions will be reported to unitholders on Form 1099 after the end of the calendar year. Future quarterly distributions, if any, will be determined by our Board. We expect that our distributions to unitholders will generally be from accumulated net investment income, from net realized capital gains or non-taxable return of capital, if any, as applicable.

We have elected to be taxed as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. To maintain our RIC tax treatment, we must distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, out of the assets legally available for distribution. In addition, although we currently intend to distribute realized net capital gains (i.e., net long-term capital gains in excess of short-term capital losses), if any, at least annually, out of the assets legally available for such distributions, we may in the future decide to retain such capital gains for investment.

We may not be able to achieve operating results that will allow us to make distributions at a specific level or to increase the amount of these distributions from time to time. In addition, due to the asset coverage test applicable to us as a business development company, we may in the future be limited in our ability to make distributions. Also, our revolving credit facility may limit our ability to declare distributions if we default under certain provisions. If we do not distribute a certain percentage of our income annually, we will suffer adverse tax consequences, including possible loss

79

of the tax benefits available to us as a regulated investment company. In addition, in accordance with GAAP and tax regulations, we include in income certain amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as contractual payment-in-kind interest, which represents contractual interest added to the loan balance that becomes due at the end of the loan term, or the accrual of original issue or market discount. Since we may recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income, we may have difficulty meeting the requirement to distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income to obtain tax benefits as a regulated investment company.

With respect to the distributions to unitholders, income from origination, structuring, closing and certain other upfront fees associated with investments in portfolio companies are treated as taxable income and accordingly, distributed to unitholders.

We cannot assure unitholders that they will receive any distributions at a particular level.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The selected financial information and other data presented below should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report. Financial information is presented for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020, December 31, 2019 and the period August 1, 2018 (date of sale of units to the Adviser) to December 31, 2018. The selected historical financial data has been derived from our financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

80

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors and undue reliance should not be placed thereon. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the Company, our current and prospective portfolio investments, our industry, our beliefs and opinions, and our assumptions. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “will,” “may,” “continue,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “targets,” “projects,” “outlook,” “potential,” “predicts” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements, including without limitation:

These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements, including without limitation:

81

Although we believe that the assumptions on which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also could be inaccurate. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this report should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved. These risks and uncertainties include those described or identified in the section entitled “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report.

These forward-looking statements apply only as of the date of this report. Moreover, we assume no duty and do not undertake to update the forward-looking statements.

The following analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes thereto contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

The Company was formed as a limited liability company under the laws of the State of Delaware on May 18, 2018. We have elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), and have elected to be treated as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As such, we are required to comply with various regulatory requirements, such as the requirement to invest at least 70% of our assets in “qualifying assets,” source of income limitations, asset diversification requirements, and the requirement to distribute annually at least 90% of our taxable income and tax-exempt interest. In addition, we expect that all of the Company’s total portfolio will be comprised of investments in the U.S.

Solar Capital Partners, LLC (the “Adviser”) serves as the Company’s investment adviser pursuant to an investment management agreement between the Company and the Adviser (as amended, restated or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Investment Management Agreement”). Subject to the overall supervision of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”), the Adviser is responsible for managing the Company’s business and activities, including sourcing investment opportunities, conducting research, performing diligence on potential investments, structuring our investments, and monitoring our portfolio companies on an ongoing basis through a team of investment professionals. The managing members of the Adviser are Michael Gross and Bruce Spohler, who also comprise the Adviser’s investment committee. Pursuant to the Investment Management Agreement, the Adviser has also been appointed to provide administrative and coordination services to the Company (in such capacity, the “Administrative Coordinator”). The Administrative Coordinator supervises or provides the Company’s administrative services, including operational trade support, net asset value calculations, financial reporting, fund accounting, registrar and transfer agent services. The Administrative Coordinator also provides assistance to the Adviser in connection with communicating with investors and other persons with respect to the Company.

The Company is organized primarily for investors who may invest through one or more investment funds created by one or more financial institutions unaffiliated with the Company (collectively, the “Access Fund”). Certain other investors may also invest directly in the Company. For those investors who invest through the Access Fund, we expect the Access Fund will issue a pro rata interest to each investor in the Access Fund (the “Access Fund

82

Investors”) that, with respect to each Access Fund Investor’s investment in the Access Fund, corresponds to the pro rata share of the units issued by the Company to the Access Fund. We also expect that units will only be sold (i) in the U.S. only to U.S. persons who are “accredited investors” within the meaning of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and (ii) outside the U.S. in accordance with Regulation S under the Securities Act. Upon a sale of units to an investor, we expect the Access Fund will pass its voting rights in the Company through to the Access Fund Investors.

The Company’s principal focus is to invest in first lien and stretch first lien secured floating rate loans primarily to upper middle market private leveraged companies (generally, loan sizes of $100 million to $300 million to companies with earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) between approximately $25 million and $100 million) that have significant free cash flow and are in non-cyclical industries in which the Adviser has direct experience. In addition to senior secured loans to upper middle market companies, the Company intends to invest a portion of its assets in non-traditional asset-based loans and first lien loans to rapidly growing healthcare companies. The Company also expects that some of its investments will contain delayed-draw term loan type features (which is a legally binding commitment by the Company to fund additional term loans to a borrower in the future) and/or other types of unfunded commitments. The Company will seek to be the single source lender for the majority of its portfolio companies by leveraging the significant capital base at the Adviser for co-investment opportunities where appropriate. The Company believes many financial sponsors and individual corporate management teams are looking for a single lender to provide the entire debt financing to streamline and simplify the debt negotiation process. In order to provide a single source lender while maintaining the Company’s diversification objectives, the Company expects to co-invest with other vehicles managed by the Adviser. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to co-invest with such other funds, including as a result of legal restrictions and contractual restrictions and, as a result, the Company may not be able to meet its investment objective. The Company believes the potential scale resulting from co-investments with vehicles managed by the Adviser will provide the Company a significant advantage to source loans over other lenders that do not have the capital base to provide the entire debt financing.

The Company is an emerging growth company as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”) and the Company may from time to time take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act.

Revenues

The Company’s principal focus is to invest in first lien and stretch first lien secured floating rate loans primarily to upper middle market private leveraged companies (generally, loan sizes of $100 million to $300 million to companies with EBITDA between approximately $25 million and $100 million) that have significant free cash flow and are in non-cyclical industries in which we have direct experience. In addition to senior secured loans to upper middle market companies, the Company intends to invest a portion of its assets in non-traditional asset-based loans and first lien loans to rapidly growing healthcare companies.

Expenses

The Company will (directly or indirectly) bear:

83

In addition, the aggregate amount of the operating expenses relating to Unitholders investing directly in the Company set forth in clauses (ii)-(iv) and the operating expenses included in sub-clauses (xiii) and (xvi) related to U.S. regulatory bodies above borne by the Company (directly or indirectly) will not exceed the Operating Expense Cap, calculated as follows: (A) if the Company has less than or equal to $400 million in Commitments,

84

an amount equal to the sum of (x) the product of the Commitments and 0.0025 and (y) $1.25 million, or (B) if the Company has greater than $400 million in Commitments, $2.25 million. Any amount in excess of the Operating Expense Cap for any fiscal year will be paid by the Adviser. Solely by way of example, if Commitments equal $350 million, the Operating Expense Cap will be equal to $2.125 million. For the avoidance of doubt, the Operating Expense Cap will not apply to any fees, costs, expenses and liabilities allocable to persons investing indirectly in the Company through any Unitholder.

Additionally, the Company will not bear the costs of any third-party valuation agent engaged solely for purposes of valuing the net asset value of the Company.

The Adviser or Administrative Coordinator and/or their affiliates has advanced organizational and offering expenses to the Company, which include organizational fees, costs, expenses and liabilities of the Company, including legal expenses, incurred in connection with the initial offering of Units and the formation and establishment of the Company. The Adviser or Administrative Coordinator (or such affiliate) will be reimbursed by the Company for such advanced costs and expenses in an amount not to exceed $0.5 million. Accordingly, $0.3 million of offering expenses were charged to capital and $0.1 million of organizational costs were expensed in 2019.

Portfolio and Investment Activity

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we invested approximately $91.5 million across 21 portfolio companies. This compares to investing approximately $131.6 million across 21 portfolio companies for the year ended December 31, 2019. Investments sold or prepaid during the year ended December 31, 2020 totaled approximately $48.1 million versus approximately $12.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.

At December 31, 2020, our portfolio consisted of 27 portfolio companies and was invested 100.0% directly in senior secured loans and less than 0.1% in common equity/equity interests/warrants, in each case, measured at fair value versus 19 portfolio companies invested 100.0% directly in senior secured loans and less than 0.1% in common equity/equity interests/warrants, in each case, measured at fair value, at December 31, 2019.

At December 31, 2020, 98.2% of our income producing investment portfolio was floating rate and 1.8% was fixed rate, measured at fair value. At December 31, 2019, 97.5% of our income producing investment portfolio was floating rate and 2.5% was fixed rate, measured at fair value.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. We have identified the following items as critical accounting policies. Within the context of these critical accounting policies and disclosed subsequent events herein, we are not currently aware of any other reasonably likely events or circumstances that would result in materially different amounts being reported.

Valuation of Portfolio Investments

The Company’s NAV will be calculated periodically by the Adviser or its delegate, and approved by the Board, by taking the value of the Portfolio Investments and other assets of the Company and subtracting all liabilities, including accrued expenses.

It is anticipated that in respect of many of the Company’s assets, readily available market quotations will not be obtainable and that such assets will be valued at fair value.

85

For purposes of calculating the NAV, the Company’s assets will generally be valued as follows:

The valuation principles set forth above may be modified from time to time without notice to Unitholders, in whole or in part, as determined by the Board in its sole discretion.

Leverage

The Company is required to comply with the asset coverage requirements of the 1940 Act. The Company expects to employ leverage and otherwise incur indebtedness with respect to the portfolio both on a recourse and non-recourse basis (including and potentially through guarantees, derivatives, forward commitments and reverse repurchase agreements), but will not exceed the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. The Company is generally permitted, under specified conditions, to issue senior securities in amounts such that the Company’s asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least equal to 150% immediately after such issuance. In connection with the organization of the Company, the Adviser, as the initial Unitholder, has authorized the Company to adopt the 150% asset coverage ratio as of August 2, 2018. In connection with their subscriptions of the Units, our Unitholders were required to acknowledge our ability to operate with an asset coverage ratio that may be as low as 150%. The Company will be exposed to the risks of leverage, which may be considered a speculative investment technique. The use of leverage magnifies the potential for gain and loss on amounts invested and therefore increases the risks associated with investing in our securities. In addition, the costs associated with our borrowings, including any increase in the management fee payable to the Adviser will be borne by our Unitholders. As of December 31, 2020, the Company held $76.6 million of senior securities, for an asset coverage ratio of 225.6%.

Taxation as a Regulated Investment Company (“RIC”)

The Company elected to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code and intends to qualify for taxation as a RIC annually. As a RIC, the Company generally will not pay corporate-level U.S. federal income taxes on

86

any ordinary income or capital gains that it timely distributes to Unitholders as dividends. In order to qualify for taxation as a RIC, the Company is required, among other things, to be diversified at each quarter end and to timely distribute to its unitholders at least 90% of investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code, for each year. There is no guarantee the Company will be able to maintain its status as a RIC. Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a given tax year, the Company may choose to carry forward taxable income in excess of current year distributions into the next tax year and pay a nondeductible 4% U.S. federal excise tax on such income, as required. To the extent that the Company determines that its estimated current year annual taxable income will be in excess of estimated current year distributions, the Company will accrue an estimated excise tax, if any, on estimated excess taxable income.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2020, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.” The guidance provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contract modifications, hedging relationships and other transactions, subject to meeting certain criteria, that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of the reference rate reform. ASU 2020-04 is effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. The Company is evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s financial statements.

Results of Operations

Results are shown for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019. There were no material operations during the period ended December 31, 2018.

Investment Income

For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, gross investment income totaled $11.8 million and $5.5 million, respectively. The increase in investment income year over year is due to an increase in the size of the income producing portfolio as the Company continues to ramp toward its targeted investment portfolio size. Additionally, the volatility and disruption to the global economy and capital markets from the COVID-19 pandemic reduced the volume of our investment activity during much of the year, particularly in the second and third quarters, thus negatively impacting investment income for the period.

Expenses

Expenses totaled $6.2 million and $5.7 million, respectively, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, of which $1.9 million and $1.0 million, respectively, were management fees and administration fees and $3.7 million and $3.5 million, respectively, were interest and other credit facility expenses. Administrative services, organization and other general and administrative expenses totaled $0.7 million and $1.2 million, respectively, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. Expenses generally consist of management fees, administration fees, performance-based incentive fees, administrative services expenses, insurance, legal expenses, directors’ fees and expenses, audit and tax expenses and other general and administrative expenses. Interest and other credit facility expenses generally consist of interest, unused fees, agency fees and financing costs, if any, among others. The increase in expenses year over year was generally due to an increase in the size of the portfolio, leading to an increase in management fees, administration fees and interest expense.

Net Investment Income (Loss)

The Company’s net investment income (loss) totaled $5.5 million and ($0.2) million, or $0.64 and ($0.07) per average unit, respectively, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

87

Net Realized Gain

The Company had investment sales and prepayments totaling approximately $48.1 and $12.2 million, respectively, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. Net realized gains over the same period totaled $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively. Net realized gains for fiscal year 2020 were primarily related to the sale of select assets. Net realized gains for fiscal year 2019 were primarily related to the exit of our investments in Centria Healthcare LLC and Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Net Change in Unrealized Gain

For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, net change in unrealized gain on the Company’s assets totaled $0.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively. Net unrealized gain for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 is primarily due to appreciation on our investments in RxSense Holdings LLC, Galway Partners Holdings, LLC and ENS Holdings III Corp. & ES Opco USA LLC, among others, partially offset by the reversal of previous recorded unrealized appreciation on our investments in Kingsbridge Holdings, LLC, MRI Software LLC and Enhanced Capital Group, LLC among others. Net unrealized gain for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 is primarily due to appreciation on our investments in Kingsbridge Holdings, LLC, KORE Wireless Group, Inc. and Edgewood Partners Holdings, LLC, among others, partially offset by unrealized depreciation on our investment in US Radiology Specialists, Inc., among others.

Net Increase in Unitholders’ Capital Resulting From Operations

For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had a net increase in unitholders’ capital resulting from operations of $6.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively. For the same period, income per average unit was $0.70 and $0.15, respectively.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary uses of cash are for (i) investments in portfolio companies and other investments to comply with certain portfolio diversification requirements, (ii) the cost of operations (including paying the Adviser), (iii) debt service of any borrowings, and (iv) cash distributions to our Unitholders.

Equity

During the period March 12, 2019 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2020, on a net basis, the Company sold and issued 9,586,174 common units at an average price of $9.93 per unit, for net proceeds of $96.5 million. All of our outstanding units were issued and sold in reliance upon the available exemptions from registration requirements of Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. Unfunded equity capital commitments totaled $229.5 million at December 31, 2020.

Debt

Revolving credit facility due February 2023 (the “SPV Facility”)—On February 27, 2019, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, SCP Private Credit Income BDC SPV LLC (the “SPV”), entered into a $100 million SPV Facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. acting as administrative agent. The commitment can also be expanded up to $400 million. The stated interest rate on the Credit Facility is LIBOR plus 2.75% with no LIBOR floor requirement and the current final maturity date is February 27, 2023. The Credit Facility is secured by all of the assets held by SPV. Under the terms of the SPV Facility, the Company and SPV, as applicable, have made certain customary representations and warranties, and are required to comply with various covenants, including leverage restrictions, reporting requirements and other customary requirements for similar credit facilities. The SPV also includes usual and customary events of default for credit facilities of this nature. On November 18, 2019, the Company amended the SPV Facility, reducing commitments to $75 million. There were $53.1 million of borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2020 under the SPV Facility.

88

Revolving credit facility due March 2021 (the “Subscription Facility”)—On March 12, 2019, the Company established the $35 million Subscription Facility with East West Bank. The stated interest rate on the Subscription Facility is LIBOR plus 2.90% and the current final maturity date is March 12, 2021. On June 24, 2019, the Company entered into an amendment, increasing commitments from $35 million to $50 million. Under the terms of the Subscription Facility, the Company has made certain customary representations and warranties, and is required to comply with various covenants, including reporting requirements and other customary requirements for similar credit facilities. The Subscription Facility also includes usual and customary events of default for credit facilities of this nature. There were $23.5 million of borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2020 under the Subscription Facility.

Cash Equivalents

We deem certain U.S. Treasury bills, repurchase agreements and other high-quality, short-term debt securities as cash equivalents. The Company makes purchases that are consistent with its purpose of making investments in securities described in paragraphs 1 through 3 of Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act. From time to time, including at or near the end of each fiscal quarter, we consider using various temporary investment strategies for our business. One strategy includes taking proactive steps by utilizing cash equivalents as temporary assets with the objective of enhancing our investment flexibility pursuant to Section 55 of the 1940 Act. More specifically, from time-to-time we may purchase U.S. Treasury bills or other high-quality, short-term debt securities at or near the end of the quarter and typically close out the position on a net cash basis subsequent to quarter end. We may also utilize repurchase agreements or other balance sheet transactions, including drawing down on our credit facilities, as deemed appropriate. The amount of these transactions or such drawn cash for this purpose is excluded from total assets for purposes of computing the asset base upon which the management fee is determined. We held approximately $20 million of cash equivalents as of December 31, 2020.

Contractual Obligations

We have entered into certain contracts under which we have material future commitments. We have entered into the Investment Management Agreement with the Adviser in accordance with the 1940 Act. Under the Investment Management Agreement, the Company will pay the Adviser the Management Fee and the Incentive Fee, and the Administrative Coordinator the Administration Fee. Under the Investment Management Agreement, the Administrative Coordinator may engage or delegate certain administrative functions to third parties or affiliates on behalf of the Company. The Administrative Coordinator will be responsible for all expenses of its own staff responsible for (i) certain on-going, routine, non-investment-related administrative services for the Company, (ii) the coordination of various third party services needed or required by the Company, and (iii) certain Unitholder servicing functions.

If any of the contractual obligations discussed above are terminated, our costs under any new agreements that we enter into may increase. In addition, we would likely incur significant time and expense in locating alternative parties to provide the services we expect to receive under the Investment Management Agreement. Any new investment advisory agreement would also be subject to approval by our Unitholders.

89

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

From time-to-time and in the normal course of business, the Company may make unfunded capital commitments to current or prospective portfolio companies. Typically, the Company may agree to provide delayed-draw term loans or, to a lesser extent, revolving loan or equity commitments. These unfunded capital commitments always take into account the Company’s liquidity and cash available for investment, portfolio and issuer diversification, and other considerations. Accordingly, the Company had the following unfunded capital commitments at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively:

The credit agreements of the above loan commitments contain customary lending provisions and/or are subject to the portfolio company’s achievement of certain milestones that allow relief to the Company from funding obligations for previously made commitments in instances where the underlying company experiences materially adverse events that affect the financial condition or business outlook for the company. Since these commitments may expire without being drawn upon, unfunded commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements or future earning assets for the Company. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had sufficient cash available and/or liquid securities available to fund its commitments.

90

Distributions

The following table reflects the cash distributions per unit for the two most recent fiscal years:

Tax characteristics of all distributions will be reported to unitholders on Form 1099 after the end of the calendar year. Future quarterly distributions, if any, will be determined by our Board. We expect that our distributions to unitholders will generally be from accumulated net investment income, from net realized capital gains or non-taxable return of capital, if any, as applicable.

We have elected to be taxed as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. To maintain our RIC tax treatment, we must distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, out of the assets legally available for distribution. In addition, although we currently intend to distribute realized net capital gains (i.e., net long-term capital gains in excess of short-term capital losses), if any, at least annually, out of the assets legally available for such distributions, we may in the future decide to retain such capital gains for investment.

We may not be able to achieve operating results that will allow us to make distributions at a specific level or to increase the amount of these distributions from time to time. In addition, due to the asset coverage test applicable to us as a business development company, we may in the future be limited in our ability to make distributions. Also, our revolving credit facility may limit our ability to declare distributions if we default under certain provisions. If we do not distribute a certain percentage of our income annually, we will suffer adverse tax consequences, including possible loss of the tax benefits available to us as a regulated investment company. In addition, in accordance with GAAP and tax regulations, we include in income certain amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as contractual payment-in-kind interest, which represents contractual interest added to the loan balance that becomes due at the end of the loan term, or the accrual of original issue or market discount. Since we may recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income, we may have difficulty meeting the requirement to distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income to obtain tax benefits as a regulated investment company.

With respect to the distributions to unitholders, income from origination, structuring, closing and certain other upfront fees associated with investments in portfolio companies are treated as taxable income and accordingly, distributed to unitholders.

Related Parties

We have entered into the Investment Management Agreement with Solar Capital Partners. Mr. Gross, our Chairman, Co-Chief Executive Officer and President and Mr. Spohler, our Co-Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and board member, are managing members and senior investment professionals of, and have financial and controlling interests in, the Adviser. In addition, Mr. Peteka, our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary serves as the Chief Financial Officer for Solar Capital Partners.

91

The Adviser may also manage other funds in the future that may have investment mandates that are similar, in whole and in part, with ours. For example, the Adviser presently serves as investment adviser to Solar Capital Ltd., a publicly traded BDC, which focuses on investing in senior secured loans, including stretch-senior loans, financing leases and to a lesser extent, unsecured loans and equity securities, Solar Senior Capital Ltd., a publicly traded BDC, which focuses on investing in senior secured loans, including first lien and second lien debt instruments, as well as SLR HC BDC LLC, an unlisted BDC whose principal focus is to invest directly and indirectly in senior secured loans and other debt instruments typically to middle market companies within the healthcare industry. In addition, Michael S. Gross, our Chairman, Co-Chief Executive Officer and President, Bruce Spohler, our Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer, and Richard L. Peteka, our Chief Financial Officer, serve in similar capacities for Solar Capital Ltd., Solar Senior Capital Ltd. and SLR HC BDC LLC. The Adviser and certain investment advisory affiliates may determine that an investment is appropriate for us and for one or more of those other funds. In such event, depending on the availability of such investment and other appropriate factors, the Adviser or its affiliates may determine that we should invest side-by-side with one or more other funds. Any such investments will be made only to the extent permitted by applicable law and interpretive positions of the SEC and its staff, and consistent with the Adviser’s allocation procedures. On June 13, 2017, the Adviser received an exemptive order that permits the Company to participate in negotiated co-investment transactions with certain affiliates, in a manner consistent with the Company’s investment objective, positions, policies, strategies and restrictions as well as regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors, and pursuant to various conditions (the “Order”). If the Company is unable to rely on the Order for a particular opportunity, such opportunity will be allocated first to the entity whose investment strategy is the most consistent with the opportunity being allocated, and second, if the terms of the opportunity are consistent with more than one entity’s investment strategy, on an alternating basis. Although the Adviser’s investment professionals will endeavor to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner, the Company and its Unitholders could be adversely affected to the extent investment opportunities are allocated among us and other investment vehicles managed or sponsored by, or affiliated with, our executive officers, directors and members of the Adviser.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. In addition, U.S. and global capital markets and credit markets have experienced a higher level of stress due to the global COVID-19 pandemic, which has resulted in an increase in the level of volatility across such markets and a general decline in value of the securities that we hold. Because we fund a portion of our investments with borrowings, our net investment income is affected by the difference between the rate at which we invest and the rate at which we borrow. As a result, there can be no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income. In connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. Federal Reserve and other central banks have reduced certain interest rates and LIBOR has decreased. In a prolonged low interest rate environment, including a reduction of LIBOR to zero, the difference between the total interest income earned on interest earning assets and the total interest expense incurred on interest bearing liabilities may be compressed, reducing our net interest income and potentially adversely affecting our operating results. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, certain of the investments in our comprehensive investment portfolio had floating interest rates. These floating rate investments were primarily based on floating LIBOR and typically have durations of one to three months after which they reset to current market interest rates. Additionally, some of these investments have LIBOR floors. The Company also has revolving credit facilities that are generally based on floating LIBOR. Assuming no changes to our balance sheet as of December 31, 2020 and no new defaults by portfolio companies, a hypothetical one percent decrease in LIBOR on our comprehensive floating rate assets and liabilities would increase our net investment income by approximately one cent per average share over the next twelve months. Assuming no changes to our balance sheet as of December 31, 2020 and no new defaults by portfolio companies, a hypothetical one percent increase in LIBOR on our comprehensive floating rate assets and liabilities would decrease our net investment income by approximately one cent per average share over the next twelve months. However, we may hedge against interest rate fluctuations from time-to-time by using standard hedging instruments such as futures, options, swaps and forward contracts subject to the requirements of the

92

1940 Act. While hedging activities may insulate us against adverse changes in interest rates, they may also limit our ability to participate in any benefits of certain changes in interest rates with respect to our portfolio of investments. At December 31, 2020, we have no interest rate hedging instruments outstanding on our balance sheet.

93

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

94

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Unitholders and Board of Directors

SCP Private Credit Income BDC LLC:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of assets and liabilities, including the consolidated schedules of investments, of SCP Private Credit Income BDC LLC (and subsidiaries) (the Company) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in unitholders’ capital, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2020 and for the period March 12, 2019 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2020 and for the period March 12, 2019 to December 31, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, by correspondence with the custodian, portfolio companies or agents. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Unaudited Prior Period Consolidated Financial Statements

The accompanying consolidated statements of operations, changes in unitholders’ capital, and cash flows for the period August 1, 2018 (date of initial sale of units to the Adviser) through December 31, 2018, and the related notes were not audited by us and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion on them.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2018.

New York, New York

February 24, 2021

95

SCP Private Credit Income BDC LLC

Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities

(in thousands, except unit amounts)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

96

SCP Private Credit Income BDC LLC

Consolidated Statement of Operations

(in thousands, except unit amounts)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

97

SCP Private Credit Income BDC LLC

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Unitholders’ Capital

(in thousands, except unit amounts)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

98

SCP Private Credit Income BDC LLC

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

99

SCP Private Credit Income BDC LLC

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

December 31, 2020

(in thousands, except share/unit amounts)