Table of Contents 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018

OR

For the transition period from                    to                    

Commission File Number: 001-36735

 

Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

(310) 598-3173

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ◻    No  ☒

The registrant had 25,130,604 common units outstanding at July 27, 2018.

 

 

 

 

---

Table of Contents 

 

LANDMARK INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS LP

Table of Contents

 

 

2

---

Table of Contents 

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION 

Item 1. Financial Statements

Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except unit data)

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

---

Table of Contents 

 

Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except per unit data)

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

---

Table of Contents 

 

Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(in thousands)

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

 

 

 

5

---

Table of Contents 

 

Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP

Consolidated Statements of Equity And Mezzanine Equity

(in thousands)

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

 

 

 

6

---

Table of Contents 

 

Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

7

---

Table of Contents 

 

Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

1. Business

Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (the “Partnership”) was formed on July 28, 2014 by Landmark Dividend LLC (“Landmark” or “Sponsor”) to own and manage a portfolio of real property interest and infrastructure assets that are leased to companies in the wireless communication, outdoor advertising and renewable power generation industries. In addition, the Partnership owns certain interests in receivables associated with similar assets. The Partnership is a master limited partnership organized in the State of Delaware and has been publicly traded since its initial public offering on November 19, 2014 (the “IPO”). On July 31, 2017, the Partnership completed changes to its organizational structure by transferring substantially all of its assets to a wholly owned subsidiary, Landmark Infrastructure Inc., a Delaware corporation (“REIT Subsidiary”), which is intended to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”), under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. References in this report to “Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP,” the “partnership,” “we,” “our,” “us,” or like terms refer to Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP.

Our operations are managed by the board of directors and executive officers of Landmark Infrastructure Partners GP LLC, our general partner (the “General Partner”). As of June 30, 2018, the Sponsor and affiliates own (a) our general partner; (b) 3,193,743 common units representing limited partnership interest in the Partnership (“Common Units”); and (c) all of our incentive distribution rights (“IDRs”).

2. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidated Financial Statements

In accordance with the adoption of ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU No. 2017-01”), drop-down acquisitions no longer meet the definition of a business and do not require to be retroactively adjusted. As such, drop-down acquisitions from the Sponsor and affiliates subsequent to March 31, 2017 are accounted for prospectively as transfers of net assets in the period in which the transfer occurs at the net carrying value. Any differences between the cash consideration and the net carrying value of the transfer of net assets is allocated to the General Partner.  

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP as established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) including modifications issued under the Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”) and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The accompanying unaudited financial statements include, in our opinion, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the unaudited financial information set forth therein. Financial information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 included in these Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements is derived from our unaudited financial statements. Certain notes and other information have been condensed or omitted from the interim financial statements included in this report. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2018. All references to tenant sites are unaudited.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements, in conformity with GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

8

---

Table of Contents 

 

Income Taxes

The Partnership is generally not subject to federal, state or local income taxes, except for our subsidiary Landmark Infrastructure Asset OpCo LLC (“Asset OpCo”) and our foreign subsidiaries. Asset OpCo conducts certain activities that may not generate qualifying income and will be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Each limited partner is responsible for the tax liability, if any, related to its proportionate share of the Partnerships’ taxable income or loss. Asset OpCo and certain foreign wholly owned subsidiaries of the Partnership conduct certain activities in international locations that generate taxable income and will be treated as taxable entities. Additionally, our consolidated REIT subsidiary, Landmark Infrastructure Inc., a Delaware corporation, files as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The REIT Subsidiary has elected to be treated as a REIT and we believe that it has operated in a manner that has allowed the REIT Subsidiary to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, and the REIT Subsidiary intends to continue operating in such manner. If the REIT Subsidiary fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, and is unable to avail itself of certain savings provisions, all of its taxable income would be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates. The Partnership follows the requirements of ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), relating to uncertain tax positions. Based on its evaluation under ASC 740, the Partnership has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the consolidated and combined financial statements, nor has the Partnership been assessed interest or penalties by any major tax jurisdictions.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was signed into law, which makes significant changes to U.S. federal income tax laws applicable to businesses and their owners, including REITs and corporations. Concurrently, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB 118”), which provides guidance on accounting for tax effects of the Tax Act. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the Tax Act enactment date for companies to complete the accounting under ASC 740. In accordance with SAB 118, a company must reflect the income tax effects of those aspects of the Act for which the accounting under ASC 740 is complete. The Partnership continues to assess the impact of the Tax Act, including qualification as a real estate business. Our tax expense is provisional and reflected in the consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2018. The issuance of future administrative guidance may further clarify the interpretation of the new law and require adjustments to the provisional amount we recorded. Any adjustment required to this provisional amount is not expected to be material.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Changes to GAAP are established by the FASB in the form of ASUs to the FASB’s Accounting Standard Codification. The Partnership considers the applicability and impact of all ASUs. Newly issued ASUs not listed below are not expected to have a material impact on its combined financial position and results of operations because either the ASU is not applicable, or the impact is expected to be immaterial.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2018-07”).  ASU 2018-07 expands the scope of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees and aligning it with the accounting for share-based payments to employees, with certain exceptions. Equity–classified share–based payment awards issued to nonemployees will be measured on the grant date, instead of being remeasured through the performance completion date (generally the vesting date), as required under the current guidance. ASU 2018-07 is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Partnership does not expect the adoption of ASU 2018-07 to have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In March 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“ASU 2018-05”). ASU 2018-05 provides guidance regarding the recording of tax impacts where uncertainty exists, in the period of adoption of the Tax Act. To the extent that a company’s accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act is incomplete but it is able to determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional estimate to be included in the consolidated financial statements. If a company cannot determine a provisional estimate to be included in the consolidated financial statements, it should continue to apply ASC 740 on the basis of the provision of the tax laws that were in effect immediately before the enactment of the Tax Act. The Partnership adopted ASU 2018-05 and is continuing to evaluate the final impact of the consolidated financial statements. Additional information regarding the adoption of this standard is contained above in the Income Taxes section of Note 2, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.

9

---

Table of Contents 

 

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Restricted Cash (Topic 230) (“ASU 2016-18”). The update provides guidance on the presentation of restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. Restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should now be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown on the statements of cash flows. The amendments of this ASU are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. The Partnership adopted ASU 2016-18 during the first quarter of fiscal 2018. The retrospective adoption increased the amount included in the reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents to include the amount of restricted cash on the balance sheet. Accordingly, the consolidated statement of cash flows for the period ending in June 30, 2017 has been reclassed to conform to the current presentation. The amount of restricted cash included in the beginning and ending cash balances within the consolidated statements of cash flows was $18.7 million and $6.6 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and $2.9 million and $1.2 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The adoption had no other material impacts to the consolidated statements of cash flows and had no impact on the results of operations or financial position.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU No. 2016-02”), which establishes the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract (i.e., lessees and lessors). The updated guidance requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities arising from a lease for both financing and operating leases, along with additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures. This classification will determine whether the lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of their classification. Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases today. The ASU requires us to identify lease and nonlease components of a lease agreement. Revenue related to nonlease components will be subject to the new revenue recognition standard, as described below, effective upon adoption of the new lease accounting standard. Tenant recoveries that qualify as lease components, which relate to the right to use the leased asset (e.g., property taxes, and insurance), would be accounted for under the new lease ASU. Tenant recoveries that qualify as nonlease components, which relate to payments for goods or services that are transferred separately from the right to use the underlying asset, including tenant recoveries related to payments for maintenance activities and common area expenses, would be accounted for under the new revenue recognition ASU upon adoption of the new lease ASU. Lessors will continue to account for leases using an approach that is substantially equivalent to existing guidance for sales-type leases, direct financing leases, and operating leases. In March 2018, the FASB approved an optional practical expedient that would allow lessors to elect, by class of underlying asset, to not separate nonlease components from the related lease components. The practical expedient would be limited to circumstances in which both (1) the timing and pattern of revenue recognition are the same for the nonlease component and related lease component and (2) the combined single lease component would be classified as an operating lease. The FASB has also clarified that the lease ASU will require an assessment of whether a land easement meets the definition of a lease under the new lease ASU. An entity with land easements that are not accounted for as leases under the current lease accounting standards, however, may elect a practical expedient to exclude those land easements from assessment under the new lease accounting standards (ASU No 2018-01, Leases (Topic 842): Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842). The new lease ASU will be applied to all land easement arrangements entered into or modified on and after the ASU effective date. The Partnership’s land easements are primarily prepaid and included on the balance sheet in real property interest. The Partnership expects to apply the practical expedient to easements accounted for as operating leases. The ASU is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The standard mandates the use of the modified retrospective transition method. The Partnership is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of the new lease accounting standard on our consolidated financial statements including the method of transition. We expect to adopt the new lease accounting standard on January 1, 2019.

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU No. 2014-09”). ASU No. 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize the revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. The revenue recognition five-step model requires an entity to (i) identify the contract with the customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, including variable consideration to the extent that it is probable that a significant future reversal will not occur, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the respective performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) we satisfy the performance obligation. The Partnership completed its evaluation of its existing contracts during the fourth quarter of 2017 and adopted ASU No. 2014-09 on January 1, 2018. The Partnership concluded that the adoption of ASU No. 2014-09 did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements as the Partnership’s current revenue contracts are leases and not within the scope of the Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).

 

10

---

Table of Contents 

 

3. Acquisitions

Drop-down Acquisitions

During the six months ended June 30, 2018 and for the year ended December 31, 2017, the Partnership completed one and four drop-down acquisitions, respectively, from our Sponsor and affiliates (collectively referred to as the “Drop-down Acquisitions”). Certain real property interests and financing assets included in the Drop-down Acquisitions completed by the Partnership were part of the right of first offer assets acquired from Landmark Dividend Growth Fund-H LLC (“Fund H”) and Landmark Dividend Growth Fund-G LLC (“Fund G”). All other Drop-down Acquisitions have been made directly from our Sponsor or from a wholly-owned subsidiary of our Sponsor. The following table presents the Drop-down Acquisitions completed by the Partnership during 2018 and 2017:

 

 

 

The Drop-down Acquisitions are a transfer of net assets between entities under common control as the acquisitions do not meet the definition of a business in accordance with ASU No. 2017-01. The transfer of net assets is accounted for prospectively in the period in which the transfer occurs at the net carrying value. Any differences between the cash consideration and the net carrying value of the transfer of net assets have been allocated to the General Partner. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, the difference between the total consideration of $59.9 million and the net carrying value of $39.5 million, was allocated to the General Partner.

Third Party Acquisitions

During the six months ended June 30, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2017, the Partnership completed several direct third-party acquisitions. Third-party acquisitions include acquisitions in exchange for Common Units pursuant to our previously filed and effective registration statement on Form S-4, in which we may offer and issue, from time to time, an aggregate of up to 5,000,000 Common Units in connection with the acquisition by us or our subsidiaries of other businesses, assets or securities (the “Unit Exchange Program” or “UEP”).

11

---

Table of Contents 

 

The following table presents direct third-party acquisitions completed by the Partnership during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2017:

 

 

4. Real Property Interests

The following table summarizes the Partnership’s real property interests (in thousands):

 

 

12

---

Table of Contents 

 

During 2017, the Partnership started developing an ecosystem of technologies that provides smart enabled infrastructure (“Flex Grid”) including the Zero Site microgrid solution and digital outdoor advertising kiosks across North America. The Zero Site is a self-contained, neutral-host smart pole designed for wireless carrier and other wireless operator collocation. The Zero Site is designed for macro, mini macro and small cell deployments and will support Internet of Things (IoT), carrier densification needs, private LTE networks and other wireless solutions. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Partnership’s $23.8 million and $7.6 million, respectively, of construction in progress primarily related to the construction of the Flex Grid solution.

In December 2016, the Partnership formed a joint venture to acquire real property interests that are leased to companies in the outdoor advertising industry located in the UK and Europe. Our venture partner provides acquisition opportunities and asset management services to the consolidated joint venture. As of June 30, 2018, the consolidated joint venture had 16 tenant sites and one investment in receivable with total net book value of $33.9 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, the consolidated joint venture generated rental revenue of $1.2 million.

The Partnership applies the business combination method to all acquired investments of real property interests for transactions that meet the definition of a business combination. The fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is typically determined by using Level III valuation methods. The most sensitive assumption is the discount rate used to discount the estimated cash flows from the real estate rights. For purposes of the computation of fair value assigned to the various tangible and intangible assets, the Partnership assigned discount rates ranging between 6% and 20%.

The following table summarizes final allocations for acquisitions during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2017 of estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in thousands).

 

 

Future estimated aggregate amortization of finite lived real property interests for each of the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter as of June 30, 2018, are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

The weighted average remaining amortization period for non‑perpetual real property interests is 48 years as of June 30, 2018. 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, one of the Partnership’s real property interest was impaired and recognized impairment charges totaling $0.1 million, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, four and six of the Partnership’s real property interests were impaired as a result of termination notices received and recognized impairment charges totaling $0.7 million and $0.8 million, respectively. The carrying value of each real property interest was determined to have a fair value of zero.

In June 2018, the Partnership entered into a plan to sell one of its real property interest with an anticipated closing date in the third quarter of 2018. The Partnership has determined that the sale does not meet the criteria for discontinued operations presentation as the plan to sell does not represent a strategic shift that will have a major effect on its operations and financial results.  As a result of this classification, the assets and liabilities of the real property interest are separately presented as AHFS and liabilities associated with AHFS in the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2018.  

13

---

Table of Contents 

 

The carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities that were classified as held for sale are as follows (in thousands):

 

5. Other Intangible Assets and Liabilities

The following table summarizes our identifiable intangible assets, including above/below‑market lease intangibles (in thousands):

 

 

We recorded net amortization of above‑ and below‑market lease intangibles of $0.3 million and $0.7 million as an increase to rental revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, and $0.4 million and $0.7 million as an increase to rental revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively.  We recorded amortization of in‑place lease intangibles of $0.6 million and $1.1 million as amortization expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, and $0.4 million and $0.8 million as amortization expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively.

Future aggregate amortization of intangibles for each of the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter as of June 30, 2018 follows (in thousands):

 

 

14

---

Table of Contents 

 

6. Investments in Receivables

Transfer of investments in receivables from the Sponsor and affiliates to the Partnership, which met the conditions to be accounted for as a sale in accordance with ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing, were recorded at their estimated fair value. The receivables are unsecured with payments collected over periods ranging from 2 to 99 years. In connection with the Drop-down Acquisitions from our Sponsor and affiliates, the Partnership acquired additional investments in receivables that were recorded at the fair value at the acquisition date, using discount rates ranging from 7% to 14%. 

Interest income recognized on the receivables totaled $0.4 million and $0.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, and $0.4 million and $0.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively.

The following table reflects the activity in investments in receivables (in thousands):

 

 

Annual amounts due as of June 30, 2018, are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

15

---

Table of Contents 

 

7. Debt

The following table summarizes the Partnership’s debt (in thousands):

 

 

Revolving Credit Facility

Substantially all of our assets, excluding equity in and assets of unrestricted subsidiaries, are pledged (or secured by mortgages), as collateral under our revolving credit facility. Our revolving credit facility contains various customary covenants and restrictive provisions.

Borrowings under the revolving credit facility bear interest at our option at a variable rate per annum equal to either:

The revolving credit facility requires monthly interest payments and the outstanding debt balance is due upon maturity. On December 28, 2017, we exercised our option to increase the available commitments under our revolving credit facility for an additional $23 million, resulting in aggregate commitments of $390 million under the revolving credit facility. Additionally, as part of the Partnership’s organization structure change on July 31, 2017, the Partnership entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement related to its revolving credit facility to add new subsidiaries as borrowers and added certain subsidiaries as guarantors. As of June 30, 2018, there was $213 million of undrawn borrowing capacity, subject to compliance with certain financial covenants. As of June 30, 2018, the Partnership was in compliance with all financial covenants required under the revolving credit facility.

16

---

Table of Contents 

 

Secured Notes

On June 6, 2018, the Partnership completed a securitization transaction (the “2018 Securitization”) involving certain tenant sites and related property interests owned by certain unrestricted special purpose subsidiaries of the Partnership, through the issuance of the Class C, Class D and Class F Series 2018-1 Secured Notes (the “2018 Secured Notes”), in an aggregate principal amount of $125.4 million. The net proceeds from the 2018 Securitization were primarily used to pay down the revolving credit facility by $120.5 million. The Class F notes are subordinated in right of payment to the Class D notes and the Class D notes are subordinated in right of payment to the Class C notes. The 2018 Secured Notes were issued at a discount of less than $0.1 million, which will be accreted and recognized as interest expense over the term of the secured notes. The Class C, Class D and Class F 2018 Secured Notes bear interest at a fixed note rate per annum of 3.97%, 4.70% and 5.92%, respectively.

On April 24, 2018, the Partnership entered into a note purchase and private shelf agreement (“Note Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to which the Partnership agreed to sell an initial $43.7 million aggregate principal amount of 4.38% senior secured notes, in a private placement (the “4.38% Senior Secured Notes”) involving a segregated pool of renewable power generation sites and related property interests. The 4.38% Senior Secured Notes are fully amortized through June 30, 2036. The Partnership may from time to time issue and sell additional senior secured notes pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, in an aggregate principal amount when aggregated with the initial principal amount of up to $225 million. We used all the net proceeds of $41.0 million to repay a portion of the borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

On November 30, 2017, the Partnership completed a securitization transaction (the “2017 Securitization”) involving certain outdoor advertising tenant sites and related property interests owned by certain unrestricted special purpose subsidiaries of the Partnership, through the issuance of the Class A and Class B Series 2017-1 Secured Notes (the “2017 Secured Notes”), in an aggregate principal amount of $80.0 million. The net proceeds from the 2017 Securitization were primarily used to pay down the revolving credit facility by $54.0 million and $17.5 million held in a restricted reserve accounts, including $16.0 million into a site acquisition account subsequently used on January 18, 2018 to acquire additional tenant sites pursuant to the Indenture. The Class B notes are subordinated in right of payment to the Class A notes. The 2017 Secured Notes were issued at a discount of $1.8 million, which will be accreted and recognized as interest expense over the term of the secured notes. The Class A and Class B 2017 Secured Notes bear interest at a fixed note rate per annum of 4.10% and 3.81%, respectively.

On June 16, 2016, the Partnership completed a securitization transaction (the “2016 Securitization”) involving certain tenant sites and related real property interests owned by certain unrestricted special purpose subsidiaries of the Partnership, through the issuance of the Class A and Class B Series 2016-1 Secured Notes (the “2016 Secured Notes”), in an aggregate principal amount of $116.6 million. The net proceeds from the Securitization were used to pay down the revolving credit facility by $112.3 million. The Class B notes are subordinated in right of payment to the Class A notes. The 2016 Secured Notes were issued at a discount of $17,292, which will be accreted and recognized as interest expense over the term of the secured notes. The Class A and Class B 2016 Secured Notes bear interest at a fixed note rate per annum of 3.52% and 7.02%, respectively.

The secured notes described above are collectively referred to as the “Secured Notes” and the tenant site assets securing the Secured Notes are collectively referred to as the “Secured Tenant Site Assets.”

The Secured Notes are secured by (1) mortgages and deeds of trust on substantially all of the Secured Tenant Site Assets and their operating cash flows, (2) a security interest in substantially all of the personal property of the obligors (as defined in the applicable indenture), and (3) the rights of the obligors under a management agreement. Under the terms of the applicable indenture, amounts due under the Secured Notes will be paid solely from the cash flows generated from the operation of the Secured Tenant Site Assets, as applicable, which must be deposited into reserve accounts, and thereafter distributed solely pursuant to the terms of the applicable indenture. On a monthly basis, after payment of all required amounts under the applicable indenture, subject to the conditions described below, the excess cash flows generated from the operation of such assets are released to the Partnership. As of June 30, 2018, $6.6 million was held in such reserve accounts which are classified as Restricted Cash on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

17

---

Table of Contents 

 

The Partnership is subject to covenants customary for notes issued in rated securitizations. Among other things, the obligors are prohibited from incurring other indebtedness for borrowed money or further encumbering their assets (as defined in the applicable agreement). Under the terms of the applicable indenture, the obligors will be permitted to issue additional notes under certain circumstances, including so long as the debt service coverage ratio (“DSCR”) of the issuer is at least 2.0 to 1.0 for the 2018 Secured Notes, 2017 Secured Notes and 2016 Secured Notes, respectively and at least 1.1 to 1.0 for the 4.38% Senior Secured Notes. As of June 30, 2018, the Partnership was in compliance with all financial covenants under the Secured Notes.

The Secured Notes’ annual principal payment amounts due as of June 30, 2018, are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Interest Expense

The Partnership incurred interest expense of $6.4 million and $12.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, and $4.2 million and $8.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively. At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Partnership had interest payable of $1.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively. Additionally, the Partnership recorded deferred loan costs amortization, which is included in interest expense, of $1.0 million and $1.9 million for three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, and $0.5 million and $0.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively.

 

8. Interest Rate Swap Agreements

The following table summarizes the terms and fair value of the Partnerships’ interest rate swap agreements (in thousands, except percentages):

 

 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, the Partnership recorded a gain of $1.3 million and a gain of $4.4 million, respectively, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Partnership recorded a loss of $0.5 million and a loss of less than $0.1 million, respectively, resulting from the change in fair value of the interest rate swap agreements, which is reflected as an unrealized gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments on the consolidated statements of operations.

18

---

Table of Contents 

 

The fair values of the interest rate swap agreements are derived based on Level 2 inputs. To illustrate the effect of movements in the interest rate market, the Partnership performed a market sensitivity analysis on its outstanding interest rate swap agreements. The Partnership applied various basis point spreads to the underlying interest rate curve of the derivative in order to determine the instruments’ change in fair value at June 30, 2018. The following table summarizes the fair values of the interest rate swaps as a result of the analysis performed (in thousands):

 

 

9. Equity

The table below summarizes changes in the number of units outstanding for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (in units):

 

On February 23, 2017, the Partnership filed a universal shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC. The shelf registration statement was declared effective by the SEC on March 27, 2017 and permits us to issue and sell common and preferred units, from time to time, representing limited partner interests in us and debt securities up to an aggregate amount of $750.0 million. 

Common Units

On February 16, 2016, the Partnership established a Common Unit at-the-market offering program (the “Common Unit ATM Program”) pursuant to which we may sell, from time to time, Common Units having an aggregate offering price of up to $50.0 million pursuant to our previously filed and effective registration statement on Form S-3.  The net proceeds from sales under the Common Unit ATM Program will be used for general partnership purposes, which may include, among other things, the repayment of indebtedness and to potentially fund future acquisitions. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, 27,830 Common Units were issued under the Common Unit ATM Program generating proceeds of approximately $0.5 million before issuance costs. No Common Units were issued under the Common Unit ATM Program during the six months ended June 30, 2017. As of June 30, 2018, we have $38.4 million remaining available to be issued under the Common Unit ATM Program.

19

---

Table of Contents 

 

On February 16, 2016, the Partnership filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-4 with the SEC. The shelf registration statement was declared effective on March 10, 2016 and permits us to offer and issue, from time to time, an aggregate of up to 5,000,000 Common Units in connection with the acquisition by us or our subsidiaries of other businesses, assets or securities. During the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, under the Unit Exchange Program, we completed an acquisition of 14 and five tenant sites in exchange for 310,960 and 70,481 Common Units, valued at approximately $4.9 million and $1.1 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2018, we have 4,289,105 Common Units remaining available to be issued under the Unit Exchange Program.

Subordinated Units

Our Partnership Agreement provides that, during the subordination period, the Common Units have the right to receive distributions of available cash from operating surplus each quarter in an amount equal to $0.2875 per Common Unit, which amount is defined in our Partnership Agreement as the minimum quarterly distribution, plus any arrearages in the payment of the minimum quarterly distribution on the Common Units from prior quarters, before any distributions of available cash from operating surplus may be made on the subordinated units. These units are deemed “subordinated” because for a period of time, referred to as the subordination period, the subordinated units are not entitled to receive any distributions until the Common Units have received the minimum quarterly distribution plus any arrearages in the payment of the minimum quarterly distribution on the Common Units from prior quarters. Furthermore, no arrearages will accrue or be payable on the subordinated units. The practical effect of the subordinated units is to increase the likelihood that, during the subordination period, there will be available cash to be distributed on the Common Units. The requirements under our Partnership Agreement for the conversion of all the subordinated units into common units were satisfied upon the payment of our quarterly cash distribution on February 14, 2018. Therefore, effective February 15, 2018, all of our subordinated units which are owned by Landmark, were converted on a one-for-one basis into common units. The conversion of subordinated units does not impact the amount of cash distributions or total number of outstanding units.

Preferred Units

On June 24, 2016, the Partnership established a Series A Preferred Unit at-the-market offering program (the “Series A Preferred Unit ATM Program”) pursuant to which we may sell, from time to time, Series A Preferred Units having an aggregate offering price of up to $40.0 million pursuant to our previously filed and effective registration statement on Form S-3. The net proceeds from sales under the Series A Preferred Unit ATM Program will be used for general Partnership purposes, which may include, among other things, the repayment of indebtedness and to potentially fund future acquisitions. During the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Partnership issued 24,747 and 210,645 Series A Preferred Units under our Series A Preferred Unit ATM Program, generating proceeds of approximately $0.6 million and $5.3 million before issuance costs, respectively. As of June 30, 2018, we have $20.1 million remaining available to be issued under the Series A Preferred Unit ATM Program.

On March 30, 2017, the Partnership established a Series B Preferred Unit at-the-market offering program (the “Series B Preferred Unit ATM Program” and together with the Series A Preferred Unit ATM Program and Common Unit ATM Program the “ATM Programs”) pursuant to which we may sell, from time to time, Series B Preferred Units having an aggregate offering price of up to $50.0 million pursuant to our previously filed and effective registration statement on Form S-3. The net proceeds from sales under the Series B Preferred Unit ATM Program will be used for general Partnership purposes, which may include, among other things, the repayment of indebtedness and to potentially fund future acquisitions.  No Series B Preferred Units were issued under our Series B Preferred Unit ATM Program during the six months ended June 30, 2018. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Partnership issued 164,060 Series B Preferred Units under our Series B Preferred Unit ATM Program, generating proceeds of approximately $4.1 million before issuance costs. As of June 30, 2018, we have $34.4 million remaining available to be issued under the Series B Preferred Unit ATM Program.

20

---

Table of Contents 

 

Mezzanine Equity

On April 2, 2018, the Partnership completed a public offering of 2,000,000 Series C Floating-to-Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Redeemable Convertible Preferred Units (“Series C Preferred Units” and together with the Series A Preferred Units and Series B Preferred Units the “Preferred Units”), representing limited partner interest in the Partnership, at a price of $25.00 per unit. We received net proceeds of approximately $47.5 million after deducting underwriters’ discounts and offering expenses paid by us of $2.5 million. We used substantially all net proceeds to repay a portion of the borrowings under our revolving credit facility. In connection with the closing of the Series C Preferred Units offering, the Partnership executed the Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (the “Partnership Agreement”) for the purpose of defining the preferences, rights, powers and duties of holders of the Series C Preferred Units.

Distributions on the Series C Preferred Units are cumulative from the date of original issue and will be payable quarterly in arrears on the 15th day of February, May, August and November of each year, when, as and if declared by the board of directors of our General Partner. The initial distribution on the Series C Preferred Units was paid on May 15, 2018 in an amount equal to $0.2090 per unit. Distributions accruing from, and including, the date of original issuance and to, but excluding May 15, 2025 will accrue at an annual rate equal to the greater of (i) 7.00% per annum, and (ii) the sum of (a) three-month LIBOR as calculated on each applicable date of determination and (b) 4.698% per annum, based on the $25.00 liquidation preference per Series C Preferred Unit. Distributions accruing on and after May 15, 2025 will accrue at 9.00% per annum of the stated liquidation preference.

Holders of Series C Preferred Units, at their option, may, at any time and from time to time, convert some or all of their Series C Preferred Units based on an initial conversion rate of 1.3017 common units per Series C Preferred Unit. In the event of a fundamental change, holder of the Series C Preferred Units, at their option, may convert some or all of their Series C Preferred Units into the greater of (i) a number of common units plus a make-whole premium and (ii) a number of common units equal to the lessor of (a) the liquidation preference divided by the market value of our common units on the effective date of such fundamental change and (b) 11.13 (subject to adjustments). On May 15, 2025, May 15, 2028, and each subsequent five-year anniversary date thereafter (each such date, a “designated redemption date”), each holder of Series C Preferred Units shall have the right (a “redemption right”) to require the Partnership to redeem any or all of the Series C Preferred Units held by such holder outstanding on such designated redemption date at a redemption price equal to the liquidation preference of $25.00, plus all accrued and unpaid distributions to, but not including, in each case out of funds legally available for such payment and to the extent not prohibited by law, the designated redemption date (the “put redemption price”). At our option we may pay the redemption in our common units or cash, subject to certain limitations.

At any time on or after May 20, 2025, the Partnership shall have the option to redeem the Series C Preferred Units, in whole or in part, at a redemption price of $25.00 per Series C Preferred Unit plus an amount equal to all accumulated and unpaid distributions thereon to the date of redemption, whether or not declared.

The Partnership has classified the Series C Preferred Units as mezzanine equity in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets based upon the terms and conditions of the holder’s redemption option. The Partnership concluded that the Series C Preferred Units are not currently redeemable and are not probable of being redeemed by the holder for cash. If redemption becomes probable, the units will be recorded to redemption value.

21

---

Table of Contents 

 

Distributions

The table below summarizes the quarterly distributions related to our quarterly financial results:

 

 

 

10. Net Income (Loss) Per Limited Partner Unit

Landmark’s subordinated units and the General Partner’s incentive distribution rights meet the definition of a participating security and therefore we are required to compute income per unit using the two-class method under which any excess of distributions declared over net income shall be allocated to the partners based on their respective sharing of income specified in the Partnership Agreement. Payments made to our unitholders are determined in relation to actual distributions declared and are not based on the net income (loss) allocations used in the calculation of net income (loss) per unit.

Net income (loss) per unit applicable to limited partners (including subordinated unitholders) is computed by dividing limited partners’ interest in net income (loss), after deducting any Preferred Unit distributions and General Partner incentive distributions, by the weighted-average number of outstanding common and subordinated units. Diluted net income (loss) per unit includes the effects of potentially dilutive units on our common and subordinated units.

Effective February 15, 2018, all of our subordinated units, which were owned by Landmark, were converted on a one-for-one basis into common units. The board of directors of the general partner declared a cash distribution for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 payable on May 15, 2018 to common unitholders of record as of May 1, 2018. The subordinated units were only allocated the excess of distributions declared over net income through the conversion date.

22

---

Table of Contents 

 

The calculation of the undistributed net loss attributable to common and subordinated unitholders for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

The calculation of net income per common and subordinated unit for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 follows (in thousands, except per unit data):

 

 

 

 

23

---

Table of Contents 

 

The calculation of net income (loss) per common and subordinated unit for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 follows (in thousands, except per unit data):

 

 

11. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value for certain financial instruments is derived using a combination of market quotes, pricing models and other valuation techniques that involve significant management judgment. The price transparency of financial instruments is a key determinant of the degree of judgment involved in determining the fair value of the Partnership’s financial instruments. Financial instruments for which actively quoted prices or pricing parameters are available and for which markets contain orderly transaction will generally have a higher degree of price transparency than financial instruments for which markets are inactive or consist of non‑orderly trades. The Partnership evaluates several factors when determining if a market is inactive or when market transactions are not orderly. The following is a summary of the methods and assumptions used by management in estimating the fair value of each class of assets and liabilities for which it is practicable to estimate the fair value:

Cash and cash equivalents, rent receivables, net and accounts payable and accrued liabilities:  The carrying values of these balances approximate their fair values because of the short‑term nature of these instruments.

Revolving credit facility:  The fair value of the Partnership’s revolving credit facility is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on management’s estimates of current market interest rates for instruments with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term, loan‑to‑value ratio, type of collateral and other credit enhancements. Additionally, since a quoted price in an active market is generally not available for the instrument or an identical instrument, the Partnership measures fair value using a valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurement which typically considers what management believes is a market participant rate for a similar instrument. The Partnership classifies these inputs as Level 3 inputs. The fair value of the Partnership’s revolving credit facility is considered to approximate the carrying value because the interest payments are based on LIBOR rates that reset every month. The Partnership does not believe its credit risk has changed materially from the date the applicable LIBOR plus 2.50% was set for the revolving credit facility.

24

---

Table of Contents 

 

Secured Notes: The Partnership determines fair value of its secured notes utilizing various Level 2 sources including quoted prices and indicative quotes (non-binding quotes) from brokers that require judgment to interpret market information. Quotes from brokers require judgment and are based on the brokers’ interpretation of market information, including implied credit spreads for similar borrowings on recent trades or bid/ask prices or quotes from active markets if available.

Investments in receivables: The Partnership’s investments in receivables are presented in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at their amortized cost net of recorded reserves and not at fair value. The fair values of the receivables were estimated using an internal valuation model that considered the expected cash flow of the receivables and estimated yield requirements by market participants with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term, and credit enhancements. The Partnership classifies these inputs as Level 3 inputs.

Interest rate swap agreements:  The Partnership’s interest rate swap agreements are presented at fair value on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The valuation of these instruments is determined using a proprietary model that utilizes observable and unobservable inputs. A majority of the inputs are observable with the only unobservable inputs relating to the lack of performance risk on the part of the Partnership or the counter party to the instrument. As such, the Partnership classifies these inputs as Level 2 inputs. The proprietary model uses the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, as well as observable market‑based inputs, including the interest rate curves and volatility. The fair values of interest rate swaps are estimated using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The variable cash receipts are based on an expectation of interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. In addition, credit valuation adjustments, which consider the impact of any credit risk to the contracts, are incorporated in the fair values to account for potential nonperformance risk.

The table below summarizes the carrying amounts and fair values of financial instruments which are not carried at fair value on the face of the financial statements (in thousands):

 

 

Disclosure of the fair values of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to the Partnership as of the period end and requires a significant amount of judgment. Despite increased capital market and credit market activity, transaction volume for certain financial instruments remains relatively low. This has made the estimation of fair values difficult and, therefore, both the actual results and the Partnership’s estimate of value at a future date could be materially different.

As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Partnership measured the following assets at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):

 

 

 

25

---

Table of Contents 

 

12. Related‑Party Transactions

General and Administrative Reimbursement

Under our omnibus agreement, we are required to reimburse Landmark for expenses related to certain general and administrative services Landmark provides to us in support of our business, subject to a quarterly cap equal to the greater of $162,500 and 3% of our revenue during the preceding calendar quarter. This cap on expenses will last until the earlier to occur of: (i) the date on which our revenue for the immediately preceding four consecutive fiscal quarters exceeded $80.0 million and (ii) November 19, 2019. The full amount of general and administrative expenses incurred will be reflected on our income statements, and to the extent such general and administrative expenses exceed the cap amount, the amount of such excess will be reflected on our financial statements as a capital contribution from Landmark rather than as a reduction of our general and administrative expenses, except for expenses that would otherwise be allocated to us, which are not included in the amount of general and administrative expenses. These expenses include salary, bonus, incentive compensation and other amounts paid to persons who perform services for us or on our behalf and expenses allocated to our general partner by its affiliates. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, Landmark reimbursed us $0.6 million and $1.8 million, respectively, for expenses related to certain general and administrative expenses that exceeded the cap, and $1.1 million and $2.0 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively.

Patent License Agreement

We entered into a Patent License Agreement (“License Agreement”) with American Infrastructure Funds, LLC (“AIF”), an affiliate of the controlling member of Landmark. Under the License Agreement, AIF granted us a nonexclusive, perpetual license to practice certain patented methods related to the apparatus and method for combining easements under a master limited partnership. We have agreed to pay AIF a license fee of $50,000 for the second year of the License Agreement, and thereafter, an amount equal to the greater of (i) one‑tenth of one percent (0.1%) of our gross revenue received during such contract year; or (ii) $100,000. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we incurred $25,000 and $50,000, respectively, of license fees related to the AIF patent license agreement, and $25,000 and $50,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively.

Right of First Offer

Certain other investment funds managed by Landmark have granted us a right of first offer (“ROFO”) on real property interests that they currently own or acquire in the future before selling or transferring those assets to any third party. During the six months ended June 30, 2018 and during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Partnership completed the following ROFO acquisitions:

 

 

See further discussion in Note 3, Acquisitions for additional information.

26

---

Table of Contents 

 

Secured Tenant Site Assets’ Management Fee

In connection with the issuance of the Secured Notes, the Partnership entered into applicable management agreements with the General Partner. Pursuant to the applicable management agreements, our General Partner will perform those functions reasonably necessary to maintain, manage and administer the Secured Tenant Site Assets for a monthly management fee equal to 1.5% of the Secured Tenant Site Assets’ operating revenue, as defined by the applicable management agreements for the 2016, 2017 and the 2018 secured notes and 0.5% of operating revenue for the 4.38% senior secured notes. The Secured Tenant Site Assets’ management fee to Landmark will be treated as a capital distribution to Landmark. Landmark will reimburse us for the fees paid with the reimbursement treated as a capital contribution. We incurred $9,258 and $16,026 of Secured Tenant Site Assets’ management fees during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, and $4,611 and $9,248 of Secured Tenant Site Assets’ management fees during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively.

Acquisition of Real Property Interests

In connection with third party acquisitions, Landmark will be obligated to provide acquisition services to us, including asset identification, underwriting and due diligence, negotiation, documentation and closing, at the reasonable request of our General Partner, but we are under no obligation to utilize such services. We will pay Landmark reasonable fees, as mutually agreed to by Landmark and us, for providing these services. These fees will not be subject to the cap on general and administrative expenses described above. As of June 30, 2018, no such fees have been incurred.

Penteon Partnership

On June 13, 2017, the Partnership and its Sponsor entered into a partnership with Penteon Corporation to deploy a nationwide Low Power Wide Area Network (LPWAN) based on the global open standard called LoRaWAN™ and utilizing the real property interests controlled by the Sponsor and the Partnership. As part of the agreement, the Sponsor owns a warrant to purchase up to approximately 25% of Penteon’s preferred stock. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Partnership incurred zero and $0.2 million in leasing costs related to the deployment of LPWAN on its sites.

Incentive Distribution Rights

Cash distributions will be made to our General Partner in respect of its ownership of all IDRs, which entitle our General Partner to receive increasing percentages, up to a maximum of 50%, of the available cash we distribute from operating surplus (as defined in our Partnership Agreement) in excess of $0.2875 per unit per quarter. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we paid $0.2 million and $0.4 million of incentive distribution rights, respectively.

Due from Affiliates

At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the General Partner and its affiliates owed $0.6 million and $0.6 million, respectively, to the Partnership primarily for the current quarter general and administrative reimbursement and for rents received on our behalf.

13. Segment Information

The Partnership had three reportable segments, wireless communication, outdoor advertising and renewable power generation for all periods presented.

The Partnership’s wireless communication segment consists of leasing infrastructure and real property interests and providing financing to companies in the wireless communication industry in the United States, Canada, and Australia. The Partnership’s outdoor advertising segment consists of leasing real property interests to companies in the outdoor advertising industry in the United States, Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom. The Partnership’s renewable power generation segment consists of leasing real property interests and providing financing to companies in the renewable power industry in the United States. Items that are not included in any of the reportable segments are included in the corporate category.

The reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services. They are commonly managed as all three businesses require similar marketing and business strategies. Because our tenant lease arrangements are mostly effectively triple-net, we evaluate our segments based on revenue. We believe this measure provides investors relevant and useful information because it is presented on an unlevered basis.

27

---

Table of Contents 

 

The statements of operations for the reportable segments are as follows:

For the three months ended June 30, 2018 (in thousands):

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2017 (in thousands):

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2018 (in thousands):

 

28

---

Table of Contents 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2017 (in thousands):

 

 

The Partnership’s total assets by segment were (in thousands):

 

 

The following table represents the Partnership’s rental revenues disaggregated by country (in thousands):

 

 

The following table represents the Partnership’s total assets disaggregated by country (in thousands):

 

 

29

---

Table of Contents 

 

14. Commitments and Contingencies

The Partnership’s commitments and contingencies include customary claims and obligations incurred in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, these matters will not have a material effect on the Partnership’s combined financial position.

There has been consolidation in the wireless communication industry historically that has led to certain lease terminations. The past consolidation in the wireless industry has led to rationalization of wireless networks and reduced demand for tenant sites. We believe the impact of past consolidation is already reflected in our occupancy rates. In April 2018, T-Mobile and Sprint announced a proposed merger. Significant consolidation among our tenants in the wireless communication industry (or our tenants’ sub‑lessees) may result in the decommissioning of certain existing communications sites, because certain portions of these tenants’ (or their sub‑lessees’) networks may be redundant. The impact of any future consolidation in the wireless communication industry and the termination of additional leases in our portfolio would result in lower rental revenue and may lead to impairment of our real property interests or other adverse effects to our business.

As of June 30, 2018, the Partnership had approximately $87.1 million of real property interests subject to subordination to lenders of the underlying property. To the extent a lender forecloses on a property the Partnership would take impairment charges for the book value of the asset and no longer be entitled to the revenue associated with the asset.

Substantially all of our tenant sites are subject to triple net or effectively triple-net lease arrangements, which require the tenant or the underlying property owner to pay all utilities, property taxes, insurance and repair and maintenance costs. Our overall financial results could be impacted to the extent the owners of the fee interest in the real property or our tenants do not satisfy their obligations.

15. Tenant Concentration

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Partnership had the following tenant revenue concentrations:

 

 

Most tenants are subsidiaries of these companies but have been aggregated for purposes of showing revenue concentration. Financial information for these companies can be found at www.sec.gov.

The loss of any one of our large customers as a result of consolidation, merger, bankruptcy, insolvency, network sharing, roaming, joint development, resale agreements by our customers or otherwise may result in (1) a material decrease in our revenue, (2) uncollectible account receivables, (3) an impairment of our deferred site rental receivables, wireless infrastructure assets, site rental contracts or customer relationships intangible assets, or (4) other adverse effects to our business.

16. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Noncash activities for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows (in thousands):

30

---

Table of Contents 

 

 

Cash flows related to interest paid was as follows (in thousands):

 

31

---

Table of Contents 

 

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this report to “our partnership,” “we,” “our,” or “us,” or like terms refer to Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP. The following is a discussion and analysis of our financial performance, financial condition and significant trends that may affect our future performance. You should read the following in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. Among other things, those historical consolidated financial statements include more detailed information regarding the basis of presentation for the following information. The following discussion and analysis contains forward‑looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward‑looking statements for many reasons, including the risks described in “Risk Factors” disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Some of the information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may contain forward‑looking statements. Forward‑looking statements give our current expectations, contain projections of results of operations or of financial condition, or forecasts of future events. Words such as “may,” “will,” “assume,” “forecast,” “position,” “predict,” “strategy,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “project,” “budget,” “potential,” or “continue,” and similar expressions are used to identify forward‑looking statements. They can be affected by and involve assumptions used or known or unknown risks or uncertainties. Consequently, no forward‑looking statements can be guaranteed. When considering these forward‑looking statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors and other cautionary statements as set forth in “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. Actual results may vary materially. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward‑looking statements. You should also understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors and should not consider the following list to be a complete statement of all potential risks and uncertainties. The risk factors and other factors noted throughout our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by such forward‑looking statements, including the following:

32

---

Table of Contents 

 

All forward‑looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing cautionary statements.

Overview

We are a growth‑oriented partnership formed by our Sponsor to own and manage a portfolio of real property interests and infrastructure assets that we lease to companies in the wireless communication, outdoor advertising and renewable power generation industries. In addition, the Partnership owns certain interests in receivables associated with similar assets. We generate revenue and cash flow from existing tenant leases of our real property interests and infrastructure assets to wireless carriers, cellular tower owners, outdoor advertisers and renewable power producers.

The Partnership is a master limited partnership organized in the State of Delaware and has been publicly traded since its initial public offering on November 19, 2014. On July 31, 2017, the Partnership completed changes to its organizational structure by transferring substantially all of its assets to a subsidiary, Landmark Infrastructure Inc., a Delaware corporation, which is intended to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. We intend to continue to own and operate substantially all of our assets through the REIT Subsidiary. These changes are designed to simplify tax reporting for unitholders and intended to broaden the Partnership’s investor base by substantially eliminating unrelated business taxable income allocated by the Partnership to tax-exempt investors, including individuals investing through tax-deferred accounts such as an individual retirement account.

How We Generate Rental Revenue

We primarily generate rental revenue and cash flow from existing leases of our tenant sites to wireless carriers, cellular tower owners, outdoor advertisers and renewable power producers. The amount of rental revenue generated by the assets in our portfolio depends principally on occupancy levels and the tenant lease rates and terms at our tenant sites.

We believe the terms of our tenant leases provide us with stable and predictable cash flow that will support consistent, growing distributions to our unitholders. Substantially all of our tenant lease arrangements are triple net or effectively triple-net, meaning that our tenants or the underlying property owners are generally contractually responsible for property‑level operating expenses, including maintenance capital expenditures, property taxes and insurance. In addition, over 93% of our tenant leases have contractual fixed‑rate escalators or consumer price index (“CPI”)‑based rent escalators, and some of our tenant leases contain revenue‑sharing provisions in addition to the base monthly or annual rental payments. Occupancy rates under our tenant leases have historically been very high. We also believe we are well positioned to negotiate higher rents in advance of lease expirations as tenants request lease amendments to accommodate equipment upgrades or add tenants to increase co‑location.

Future economic or regional downturns affecting our submarkets that impair our ability to renew or re‑lease our real property interests and other adverse developments that affect the ability of our tenants to fulfill their lease obligations, such as tenant bankruptcies, could adversely affect our ability to maintain or increase rental rates at our sites. Adverse developments or trends in one or more of these factors could adversely affect our rental revenue and tenant recoveries in future periods.

Significant consolidation among our tenants in the wireless communication industry (or our tenants’ sub‑lessees) may result in the decommissioning of certain existing communications sites, because certain portions of these tenants’ (or their sub‑lessees’) networks may be redundant. The loss of any one of our large customers as a result of joint ventures, mergers, acquisitions or other cooperative agreements may result in a material decrease in our revenue. In April 2018, T-Mobile and Sprint announced a proposed merger. For the three months ended June 30, 2018, T-Mobile and Sprint represented approximately 10.3% and 8.7%, respectively, of rental revenue.

How We Evaluate Our Operations

Our management uses a variety of financial and operating metrics to analyze our performance. These metrics are significant factors in assessing our operating results and profitability and include: (1) occupancy (2) operating and maintenance expenses; (3) Adjusted EBITDA; and (4) distributable cash flow.

33

---

Table of Contents 

 

Occupancy

The amount of revenue we generate primarily depends on our occupancy rate. As of June 30, 2018, we had a 96% occupancy rate with 2,327 of our 2,415 available tenant sites leased. We believe the infrastructure assets at our tenant sites are essential to the ongoing operations and profitability of our tenants and will be a critical component for the rollout of future technologies such as 5G, IOT and autonomous vehicles. Combined with the challenges and costs of relocating the infrastructure, we believe that we will continue to enjoy high tenant retention and occupancy rates.

There has been consolidation in the wireless communication industry historically that has led to certain lease terminations. We believe the impact of past consolidation is already reflected in our occupancy rates. Additional consolidation among our tenants in the wireless communication industry (or our tenants’ sub‑lessees) may result in lease terminations for certain existing communication sites. Any additional termination of leases in our portfolio would result in lower rental revenue, may lead to impairment of our real property interests, or other adverse effects to our business.

Operating and Maintenance Expenses

Substantially all of our tenant sites are subject to triple net or effectively triple-net lease arrangements, which require the tenant or the underlying property owner to pay all utilities, property taxes, insurance and repair and maintenance costs. Our overall financial results could be impacted to the extent the owners of the fee interest in the real property or our tenants do not satisfy their obligations.

EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable Cash Flow

We define EBITDA as net income before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and we define Adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA before impairments, acquisition‑related costs, unrealized or realized gain or loss on derivatives, loss on early extinguishment of debt, gain on sale of real property interest, unit-based compensation, straight line rental adjustments, amortization of above‑ and below‑market lease intangibles plus cash receipts applied toward the repayments of investments in receivables, and after the deemed capital contribution to fund our general and administrative expense reimbursement. We define distributable cash flow as Adjusted EBITDA less cash interest paid, current cash income tax paid, maintenance capital expenditures, preferred unit distributions and net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. Distributable cash flow will not reflect changes in working capital balances.

EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow are non‑GAAP supplemental financial measures that management and external users of our financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies, may use to assess:

We believe that the presentation of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q provides information useful to investors in assessing our financial condition and results of operations. The GAAP measures most directly comparable to EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow are net income and net cash provided by operating activities. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow should not be considered as an alternative to GAAP net income, net cash provided by operating activities or any other measure of financial performance or liquidity presented in accordance with GAAP. Each of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow has important limitations as analytical tools because they exclude some, but not all, items that affect net income and net cash provided by operating activities, and these measures may vary from those of other companies. You should not consider EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. As a result, because EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow may be defined differently by other companies in our industry, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow as presented below may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies, thereby diminishing their utility.

34

---

Table of Contents 

 

Factors Affecting the Comparability of Our Financial Results

Our future results of operations may not be comparable to our historical results of operations for the reasons described below:

Acquisitions and Developments

We have in the past and intend to continue to pursue acquisitions of real property interests and developments of infrastructure. Our significant historical acquisition activity impacts the period to period comparability of our results of operations. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, the Partnership acquired 180 tenant sites and real property interest for total consideration of $115.6 million.

Included in the Drop-down Assets acquired by the Partnership during the six months ended June 30, 2018, 127 tenant sites were part of the right of first offer assets acquired from Landmark Dividend Growth Fund-H LLC (“Fund H”) for a total consideration of $59.9 million. In connection with the August 30, 2016 Fund G drop-down acquisition, the Partnership entered into a contractual obligation to acquire two tenant sites and related real property interests.  The Partnership acquired one of these tenant sites and related real property interests on March 31, 2017 for cash consideration of $7.5 million and the remaining additional tenant site for $3.8 million on April 28, 2017.  Upon completion of the full $11.3 million acquisition, the Partnership issued 221,729 Common Units to Fund G on April 28, 2017.

Additionally, during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and for the year ended December 31, 2017, the Partnership acquired 53 tenant sites and 63 tenant sites and one investment in receivables from third parties for a total consideration of $55.7 million and $41.0 million, respectively. See Note 3, Acquisitions to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Secured Notes

On June 6, 2018, the Partnership completed a securitization transaction (the “2018 Securitization”) involving a segregated pool of wireless communication sites and related property interests owned by certain special purpose subsidiaries of the Partnership, through the issuance of the Series 2018-1 Secured Tenant Site Contract Revenue Notes, Class C, Class D and Class F (the “2018 Secured Notes”), in an aggregate principal amount of $125.4 million. The Class C, Class D and Class F 2018 Secured Notes bear interest at a fixed note rate per annum of 3.97%, 4.70% and 5.92%, respectively.

On April 24, 2018, the Partnership entered into a note purchase and private shelf agreement (“Note Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to which the Partnership agreed to sell an initial $43.7 million aggregate principal amount of 4.38% senior secured notes, in a private placement (the “4.38% Senior Secured Notes”) involving a segregated pool of renewable power generation sites and related property interests. The 4.38% Senior Secured Notes are fully amortized through June 30, 2036. The Partnership may from time to time issue and sell additional senior secured notes pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, in an aggregate principal amount when aggregated with the initial principal amount of up to $225 million. 

On November 30, 2017, the Partnership completed its second securitization transaction (the “2017 Securitization”) involving a segregated pool of certain outdoor advertising sites and related property interests owned by certain special purpose subsidiaries of the Partnership, through the issuance of the Series 2017-1 Secured Tenant Site Contract Revenue Notes, Class A and Class B (the “2017 Secured Notes”), in an aggregate principal amount of $80.0 million. The Class A and Class B 2017 Secured Notes bear interest at a fixed note rate per annum of 4.10% and 3.81%, respectively.

On June 16, 2016, the Partnership completed a securitization transaction (the “2016 Securitization”) involving a segregated pool of wireless communication sites and related real property interests owned by certain special purpose subsidiaries of the Partnership, through the issuance of the Series 2016-1 Secured Tenant Site Contract Revenue Notes, Class A and Class B (the “2016 Secured Notes”), in an aggregate principal amount of $116.6 million. The Class A and Class B 2016 Secured Notes bear interest at a fixed note rate per annum of 3.52% and 7.02%, respectively.

The secured notes described above are collectively referred to as the “Secured Notes” and the tenant site assets securing the Secured Notes are collectively referred to as the “Secured Tenant Site Assets.” See Note 7, Debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

35

---

Table of Contents 

 

Series C Preferred Units

On April 2, 2018, the Partnership completed a public offering of 2,000,000 Series C Floating-to-Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Redeemable Convertible Preferred Units (“Series C Preferred Units”), representing limited partner interest in the Partnership, at a price of $25.00 per unit. We received net proceeds of approximately $47.5 million after deducting underwriters’ discounts and offering expenses paid by us of $2.5 million. We used substantially all net proceeds to repay a portion of the borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

Holders of Series C Preferred Units, at their option, may, at any time and from time to time, convert some or all of their Series C Preferred Units based on an initial conversion rate of 1.3017 common units per Series C Preferred Unit. In the event of a fundamental change, holder of the Series C Preferred Units, at their option, may convert some or all of their Series C Preferred Units into the greater of (i) a number of common units plus a make-whole premium and (ii) a number of common units equal to the lessor of (a) the liquidation preference divided by the market value of our common units on the effective date of such fundamental change and (b) 11.13 (subject to adjustments). On May 15, 2025, May 15, 2028, and each subsequent five-year anniversary date thereafter (each such date, a “designated redemption date”), each holder of Series C Preferred Units shall have the right (a “redemption right”) to require the Partnership to redeem any or all of the Series C Preferred Units held by such holder outstanding on such designated redemption date at a redemption price equal to the liquidation preference of $25.00, plus all accrued and unpaid distributions to, but not including, in each case out of funds legally available for such payment and to the extent not prohibited by law, the designated redemption date (the “put redemption price”). At our option we may pay the redemption in our common units or cash, subject to certain limitations.

At any time on or after May 20, 2025, the Partnership shall have the option to redeem the Series C Preferred Units, in whole or in part, at a redemption price of $25.00 per Series C Preferred Unit plus an amount equal to all accumulated and unpaid distributions thereon to the date of redemption, whether or not declared. See Note 9, Equity to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Historically, we have hedged a portion of the variable interest rates under our secured debt facilities through interest rate swap agreements. We have not applied hedge accounting to these derivative financial instruments which has resulted in the change in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements to be reflected in income as either a realized or unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives.

General and Administrative Expenses

Under the Partnership’s Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP dated April 2, 2018 (the “Partnership Agreement”), we are required to reimburse our general partner and its affiliates for all costs and expenses that they incur on our behalf for managing and controlling our business and operations. Except to the extent specified under our Omnibus Agreement with Landmark (“Omnibus Agreement”), our general partner determines the amount of these expenses and such determinations must be made in good faith under the terms of the Partnership Agreement. Under the Omnibus Agreement, we agreed to reimburse Landmark for expenses related to certain general and administrative services that Landmark will provide to us in support of our business, subject to a quarterly cap equal to the greater of $162,500 and 3% of our revenue during the preceding calendar quarter. This cap on expenses will last until the earlier to occur of: (i) the date on which our revenue for the immediately preceding four consecutive fiscal quarters exceeded $80.0 million and (ii) the fifth anniversary of the closing of the IPO (November 19, 2019). The full amount of our general and administrative expenses incurred will be reflected on our income statements, and to the extent such general and administrative expenses exceed the cap amount, the amount of such excess will be reflected on our financial statements as a capital contribution from Landmark rather than as a reduction of our general and administrative expenses, except for expenses that would otherwise be allocated to us, which are not included in the amount of general and administrative expenses.

On July 31, 2017, the Partnership amended its Partnership agreement and revolving credit facility and completed changes to its organizational structure by moving the Partnership’s assets under a subsidiary intended to be taxed as a real estate investment trust. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Partnership incurred $0.5 million in expenses related to the change in organization structure. Such expenses are included in General and Administrative Expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2017.

36

---

Table of Contents 

 

Basis in Real Property Interests

Prior to the adoption of ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU No. 2017-01”) on April 1, 2017, we concluded that the contribution of interests by the funds and the Drop-Down Acquisitions were deemed transactions among entities under common control, since these entities have common management and ownership and are under common control. As a result, the contribution and acquisition of real property interests and other assets from the funds and the Drop-down Assets were recorded at Landmark’s historical cost. The statements of operations, financial position and cash flows were adjusted retroactively as if the transactions occurred on the earliest date during which the entities were under common control. In accordance with the adoption of ASU No. 2017-01, drop-down acquisitions no longer meet the definition of a business and do not require to be retroactively adjusted. As such, drop-down acquisitions from the Sponsor and affiliates subsequent to March 31, 2017 are accounted for prospectively as transfers of net assets in the period in which the transfer occurs at the net carrying value. Any differences between the cash consideration and the net carrying value of the transfer of net assets have been allocated to the General Partner.

Factors That May Influence Future Results of Operations

Acquisitions

We intend to pursue acquisitions of real property interests from Landmark and its affiliates, including those real property interests subject to our right of first offer. We also intend to pursue acquisitions of real property interests from third parties, utilizing the expertise of our management and other Landmark employees to identify and assess potential acquisitions, for which we would pay Landmark mutually agreed reasonable fees. When acquiring real property interests, we will target infrastructure locations that are essential to the ongoing operations and profitability of our tenants, which we expect will result in continued high tenant occupancy and enhance our cash flow stability. We expect the vast majority of our acquisitions will include leases with our Tier 1 tenants or tenants whose sub‑tenants are Tier 1 companies. Additionally, we will focus on infrastructure locations with characteristics that are difficult to replicate in their respective markets, and those with tenant assets that cannot be easily moved to nearby alternative sites or replaced by new construction. Although our initial portfolio is focused on wireless communication, outdoor advertising and renewable power generation assets in the United States, we intend to grow our initial portfolio of real property interests into other fragmented infrastructure asset classes and expect to continue to pursue acquisitions internationally.

During 2017, the Partnership started developing an ecosystem of technologies that provides smart enabled infrastructure (“Flex Grid”) including the Zero Site microgrid solution and digital outdoor advertising kiosks across North America. The Zero Site is a self-contained, neutral-host smart pole designed for wireless carrier and other wireless operator collocation. The Zero Site is designed for macro, mini macro and small cell deployments and will support Internet of Things (IoT), carrier densification needs, private LTE networks and other wireless solutions. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Partnership’s $23.8 million and $7.6 million of construction in progress balance related to the Flex Grid solution, respectively. As we deploy these infrastructure assets, we may incur additional operating expenses associated with ground lease payments and other operating expenses to maintain our infrastructure assets.

Mergers

Significant consolidation among our tenants in the wireless communication industry (or our tenants’ sub‑lessees) may result in the decommissioning of certain existing communications sites, because certain portions of these tenants’ (or their sub‑lessees’) networks may be redundant. The loss of any one of our large customers as a result of joint ventures, mergers, acquisitions or other cooperative agreements may result in a material decrease in our revenue. In April 2018, T-Mobile and Sprint announced a proposed merger. For the three months ended June 30, 2018, T-Mobile and Sprint represented approximately 10.3% and 8.7%, respectively, of rental revenue.

Changing Interest Rates

Interest rates have been at or near historic lows in recent years and have recently started to rise. If interest rates rise further, this may impact the availability and terms of debt financing, our interest expense associated with existing and future debt or our ability to make accretive acquisitions.

37

---

Table of Contents 

 

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. We base estimates on the best information available to us at the time, our experience and on various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions or other matters had been different, it is possible that different accounting would have been applied, resulting in a different presentation of our consolidated financial statements. From time to time, we re-evaluate our estimates and assumptions. In the event estimates or assumptions prove to be different from actual results, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current estimates and assumptions about matters that are inherently uncertain. A summary of our critical accounting policies is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Our critical accounting policies have not changed during 2018.

Historical Results of Operations of our Partnership

Segments

We conduct business through three reportable business segments: Wireless Communication, Outdoor Advertising and Renewable Power Generation. Our reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services. They are commonly managed, as all three businesses require similar marketing and business strategies. We evaluate our segments based on revenue because substantially all of our tenant lease arrangements are triple net or effectively triple-net. We believe this measure provides investors relevant and useful information because it is presented on an unlevered basis.

Results of Operations

Our results of operations for all periods presented were affected by acquisitions made during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2017. As of June 30, 2018 and 2017, we had 2,415 and 2,093 available tenant sites with 2,327 and 2,016 leased tenant sites, respectively.

The following table summarizes the consolidated statements of operations of the Partnership for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):

 

38

---

Table of Contents 

 

Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 to Three Months Ended June 30, 2017

Rental Revenue

Rental revenue increased $4.0 million, $2.2 million of which was due to the greater number of assets in the portfolio during the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017. Revenue generated from our wireless communication, outdoor advertising, and renewable power generation segments was $10.4 million, $4.3 million, and $2.1 million, or 62%, 26%, and 12% of total rental revenue, respectively, during the three months ended June 30, 2018, compared to $8.2 million, $2.5 million, and $2.1 million, or 64%, 19%, and 17% of total rental revenue, respectively, during the three months ended June 30, 2017. The occupancy rates in our wireless communication, outdoor advertising, and renewable power generation segments were 96%, 98%, and 100%, respectively, at June 30, 2018 compared to 96%, 98%, and 100%, respectively, at June 30, 2017. Additionally, our effective monthly rental rates per tenant site for wireless communication, outdoor advertising and renewable power generation segments were $1,995, $2,349, and $9,510, respectively, during three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to $1,864, $1,534, and $10,999, respectively, during the three months ended June 30, 2017.

Property Operating

Property operating expenses increased $0.2 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017 due to the increase in property taxes as a result of an increase in fee simple properties that are not leased under a triple net lease structure, rent expense and UK property management fees. Substantially all of our tenant sites are subject to triple net or effectively triple net lease arrangements, which require the tenant or the underlying property owner to pay all utilities, property taxes, insurance and repair and maintenance costs. As we deploy Flex Grid solution, we may incur additional operating expenses associated with ground lease payments and other operating expenses to maintain our infrastructure assets.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses decreased $0.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to change in the Partnership’s organization structure during 2017. On July 31, 2017, the Partnership amended its Partnership agreement and revolving credit facility and completed changes to its’ organizational structure by moving the Partnership’s assets under a REIT subsidiary. During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Partnership incurred $0.4 million in fees related to the change in organization structure. Under our Partnership Agreement, we are required to reimburse our general partner and its affiliates for all costs and expenses that they incur on our behalf for managing and controlling our business and operations. Except to the extent specified under our Omnibus Agreement, our general partner determines the amount of these expenses and such determinations must be made in good faith under the terms of the Partnership Agreement. Under the Omnibus Agreement, we agreed to reimburse Landmark for expenses related to certain general and administrative services that Landmark will provide to us in support of our business, subject to a quarterly cap equal to the greater of $162,500 and 3% of our revenue during the preceding calendar quarter. This cap on expenses will last until the earlier to occur of: (i) the date on which our revenue for the immediately preceding four consecutive fiscal quarters exceeded $80.0 million and (ii) the fifth anniversary of the closing of the IPO (November 19, 2019). The full amount of general and administrative expenses incurred is reflected on our income statements and the amount in excess of the cap that is reimbursed is reflected on our financial statements as a capital contribution from Landmark rather than as a reduction of our general and administrative expenses, except for expenses that would otherwise be allocated to us, which are not included in the amount of general and administrative expenses. For the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, Landmark reimbursed us $0.6 million and $1.1 million, respectively, for expenses related to certain general and administrative services expenses that exceeded the cap.

 

Acquisition‑Related

Acquisition‑related expenses decreased $0.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017 as a result of the Partnership’s early adoption of ASU No. 2017-01 on April 1, 2017. Under ASU No. 2017-01, for acquisitions that do not meet the definition of a business, acquisition costs are required to be capitalized instead of expensed. Acquisition‑related expenses are third party fees and expenses related to acquiring an asset and include survey, title, legal, and other items as well as legal and financial advisor expenses associated with the acquisition.  Additionally, we expect future drop-down acquisitions from the Sponsor and affiliates to be transfers of net assets that are not a business. The transfer of net assets will be accounted for prospectively in the period in which the transfer occurs at the net carrying value, and prior periods will not be retroactively adjusted. Acquisition costs for transactions between entities under common control are expensed as incurred.

39

---

Table of Contents 

 

Amortization

Amortization expense increased $1.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017, as a result of having 2,415 tenant sites as of June 30, 2018 compared to 2,093 tenant sites as of June 30, 2017. We expect amortization of investments in real property rights with finite useful lives and in‑place lease values to continue to increase based on increased acquisitions and assets acquired in 2017 contributing to a full period of amortization.

Impairments

Impairments decreased $0.6 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to one lease termination in our outdoor advertising segment for $0.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to four lease terminations in our wireless communication and outdoor advertising segments for $0.7 million during the three months ended June 30, 2017.

Interest and Other Income

Interest and other income increased less than $0.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017, primarily as a result of the acquisitions of investments in receivables in connection with the 2017 Drop-down Acquisitions from Landmark and affiliates as described in Note 3, Acquisitions to the Consolidated Financial Statement. Interest income on receivables is generated from our wireless communication, outdoor advertising, and renewable power generation segments.

 

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased $2.2 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to a greater average debt balance of approximately $537.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to an average debt balance of approximately $377.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017.

Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Financial Instruments

We mitigated exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on existing variable rate debt by entering into swap contracts that fixed the floating LIBOR rate. These interest rate swap agreements extend through and beyond the term of the Partnership’s existing credit facility. The swap contracts were adjusted to fair value at each period end. The unrealized gain recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and loss for the three months ended June 30, 2017 reflects the change in fair value of these contracts during those periods.

 

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense increased $0.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017 due to an increase in net income related to our foreign operations. Certain foreign subsidiaries of the Partnership are subject to corporate income tax in the foreign jurisdictions where we own assets and generate taxable income.

40

---

Table of Contents 

 

The following table summarizes the consolidated statements of operations of the Partnership for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):

 

Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 to Six Months Ended June 30, 2017

Rental Revenue

Rental revenue increased $7.8 million, $5.1 million of which was due to the greater number of assets in the portfolio during the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017. Revenue generated from our wireless communication, outdoor advertising, and renewable power generation segments was $20.0 million, $8.6 million, and $3.9 million, or 62%, 26%, and 12% of total rental revenue, respectively, during the six months ended June 30, 2018, compared to $16.2 million, $4.6 million, and $3.9 million, or 66%, 18%, and 16% of total rental revenue, respectively, during the six months ended June 30, 2017. The occupancy rates in our wireless communication, outdoor advertising, and renewable power generation segments were 96%, 98%, and 100%, respectively, at June 30, 2018 compared to 96%, 98%, and 100%, respectively, at June 30, 2017. Additionally, our effective monthly rental rates per tenant site for wireless communication, outdoor advertising and renewable power generation segments were $1,957, $2,313, and $8,928, respectively, during the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to $1,845, $1,439, and $10,117, respectively, during the six months ended June 30, 2017.

Property Operating

Property operating expenses increased $0.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017 due to the increase in property taxes as a result of an increase in fee simple properties that are not leased under a triple net lease structure, rent expense and UK property management fees. Substantially all of our tenant sites are subject to triple net or effectively triple net lease arrangements, which require the tenant or the underlying property owner to pay all utilities, property taxes, insurance and repair and maintenance costs. As we deploy Flex Grid solution, we may incur additional operating expenses associated with ground lease payments and other operating expenses to maintain our infrastructure assets.

41

---

Table of Contents 

 

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses decreased $0.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to change in the Partnership’s organization structure during 2017 offset by an increase in accounting, tax and legal related expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2018. On July 31, 2017, the Partnership amended its Partnership agreement and revolving credit facility and completed changes to its’ organizational structure by moving the Partnership’s assets under a REIT subsidiary. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Partnership incurred $0.5 million in fees related to the change in organization structure. Under our Partnership Agreement, we are required to reimburse our general partner and its affiliates for all costs and expenses that they incur on our behalf for managing and controlling our business and operations. Except to the extent specified under our Omnibus Agreement, our general partner determines the amount of these expenses and such determinations must be made in good faith under the terms of the Partnership Agreement. Under the Omnibus Agreement, we agreed to reimburse Landmark for expenses related to certain general and administrative services that Landmark will provide to us in support of our business, subject to a quarterly cap equal to the greater of $162,500 and 3% of our revenue during the preceding calendar quarter. This cap on expenses will last until the earlier to occur of: (i) the date on which our revenue for the immediately preceding four consecutive fiscal quarters exceeded $80.0 million and (ii) the fifth anniversary of the closing of the IPO (November 19, 2019). The full amount of general and administrative expenses incurred is reflected on our income statements and the amount in excess of the cap that is reimbursed is reflected on our financial statements as a capital contribution from Landmark rather than as a reduction of our general and administrative expenses, except for expenses that would otherwise be allocated to us, which are not included in the amount of general and administrative expenses. For the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, Landmark reimbursed us $1.8 million and $2.0 million, respectively, for expenses related to certain general and administrative services expenses that exceeded the cap.

Acquisition‑Related

Acquisition‑related expenses decreased $0.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017 as a result of the Partnership’s early adoption of ASU No. 2017-01 on April 1, 2017. Under ASU No. 2017-01, for acquisitions that do not meet the definition of a business, acquisition costs are required to be capitalized instead of expensed. Acquisition‑related expenses are third party fees and expenses related to acquiring an asset and include survey, title, legal, and other items as well as legal and financial advisor expenses associated with the acquisition.  Additionally, we expect future drop-down acquisitions from the Sponsor and affiliates to be transfers of net assets that are not a business. The transfer of net assets will be accounted for prospectively in the period in which the transfer occurs at the net carrying value, and prior periods will not be retroactively adjusted. Acquisition costs for transactions between entities under common control are expensed as incurred.

Amortization

Amortization expense increased $1.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017 as a result of having 2,415 tenant sites as of June 30, 2018 compared to 2,093 tenant sites as of June 30, 2017. We expect amortization of investments in real property rights with finite useful lives and in‑place lease values to continue to increase based on increased acquisitions and assets acquired in 2017 contributing to a full period of amortization.

Impairments

Impairments decreased $0.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to one lease termination in our outdoor advertising segment for $0.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to six lease terminations in our wireless communication and outdoor advertising segments for $0.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017.

Interest and Other Income

Interest and other income increased $0.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017 primarily as a result of the acquisitions of investments in receivables in connection with the 2017 Drop-down Acquisitions from Landmark and affiliates as described in Note 3, Acquisitions to the Consolidated Financial Statement. Interest income on receivables is generated from our wireless communication, outdoor advertising, and renewable power generation segments.

42

---

Table of Contents 

 

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased $4.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to a greater average debt balance of approximately $518.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to an average debt balance of approximately $367.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Financial Instruments

We mitigated exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on existing variable rate debt by entering into swap contracts that fixed the floating LIBOR rate. These interest rate swap agreements extend through and beyond the term of the Partnership’s existing credit facility. The swap contracts were adjusted to fair value at each period end. The unrealized gain recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and loss for the six months ended June 30, 2017 reflects the change in fair value of these contracts during those periods.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense increased $0.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to six months ended June 30, 2017 due to an increase in net income related to our foreign operations. Certain foreign subsidiaries of the Partnership are subject to corporate income tax in the foreign jurisdictions where we own assets and generate taxable income.

43

---

Table of Contents 

 

Non‑GAAP Financial Measures

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of our historical EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow for the periods presented to net cash provided by operating activities and net income (in thousands):

 

 

44

---

Table of Contents 

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our short‑term liquidity requirements will consist primarily of funds to pay for operating expenses, acquisitions and developments and other expenditures directly associated with our assets, including:

We intend to satisfy our short‑term liquidity requirements through cash flow from operating activities and through borrowings available under our revolving credit facility. We may also satisfy our short-term liquidity requirements through the issuance of additional equity, formation of joint ventures, amending our existing revolving credit facility to increase the available commitments or refinancing some of the outstanding borrowings under our existing credit facility through securitizations or other long-term debt arrangements.  Access to capital markets impacts our cost of capital and ability to refinance indebtedness, as well as our ability to fund future acquisitions and development through the issuance of additional securities or secured debt. Credit ratings impact our ability to access capital and directly impact our cost of capital as well. The Partnership has a universal shelf registration statement on file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC), effective March 27, 2017, under which we have the ability to issue and sell common and preferred units representing limited partner interests in us and debt securities up to an aggregate amount of $750.0 million.

We intend to pay at least a quarterly distribution of $0.3675 per unit per quarter, which equates to approximately $9.4 million per quarter, or $37.6 million per year in the aggregate, based on the number of common units outstanding as of July 27, 2018. We do not have a legal obligation to pay this distribution or any other distribution except to the extent we have available cash as defined in our Partnership Agreement. We intend to pay a quarterly Series A and Series B Preferred Unit distribution of 8.0% and 7.9%, respectively, which equates to approximately $2.0 million per quarter, or approximately $8.0 million per year in the aggregate based on the number of Series A and Series B Preferred Units outstanding as of July 27, 2018. We intend to pay a quarterly Series C Preferred Units distribution of a rate equal to the greater of (i) 7.00% per annum, and (ii) the sum of (a) three-month LIBOR as calculated on each applicable date of determination and (b) 4.698% per annum, based on the $25.00 liquidation preference per Series C Preferred Unit. As of June 30, 2018, there were 2,000,000 Series C Preferred Units outstanding. The Preferred Unit distributions are cumulative from the date of original issuance and will be payable quarterly in arrears.

The amount of future distributions to unitholders will depend on our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements and will be determined by the General Partner’s Board of Directors on a quarterly basis. The Partnership expects to rely on external financing sources, including equity and debt issuances, to fund expansion capital expenditures and future acquisitions. However, the Partnership may use operating cash flows to fund expansion capital expenditures or acquisitions, which could result in subsequent borrowings under the revolving credit facility to pay distributions or fund other short-term working capital requirements.

The requirements under our Partnership Agreement for the conversion of all the subordinated units into common units were satisfied upon the payment of our quarterly cash distribution on February 14, 2018. Therefore, effective February 15, 2018, all of our subordinated units which are owned by Landmark, were converted on a one-for-one basis into common units. The conversion of subordinated units does not impact the amount of cash distributions or total number of outstanding units.

 

45

---

Table of Contents 

 

The table below summarizes the quarterly distribution related to our financial results:

 

 

As of June 30, 2018, we had $538.5 million of total outstanding indebtedness. On December 28, 2017, we exercised our option to increase the available commitments under our revolving credit facility for an additional $23 million, resulting in aggregate commitments of $390 million under the revolving credit facility. As of July 27, 2018, we had approximately $190 million of outstanding borrowings on our revolving credit facility, and we had approximately $200 million of undrawn borrowing capacity, subject to compliance with certain covenants, under our revolving credit facility.

Our long‑term liquidity needs consist primarily of funds necessary to pay for acquisitions and scheduled debt maturities. We intend to satisfy our long‑term liquidity needs through cash flow from operations, joint ventures, and through the issuance of additional equity and debt.

Cash Flow of the Funds

The following table summarizes the historical cash flow of the Partnership for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):

 

 

Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 to Six Months Ended June 30, 2017

Net cash provided by operating activities.  Net cash provided by operating activities increased $7.6 million to $21.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to $14.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The increase is primarily attributable to the increase in rental revenue related to the assets acquired and the timing of payments of accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

46

---

Table of Contents 

 

Net cash used in investing activities.  Net cash used in investing activities was $73.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to net cash used in investing activities of $46.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The change in cash used in investing activities was due to the number of assets acquired during the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017.

Net cash provided by financing activities.  Net cash provided by financing activities was $40.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $35.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The increase in cash provided by financing activities was primarily attributable to the net increase in proceeds from the issuance of secured notes, equity offerings and borrowings from the secured facility totaling $88.8 million, partially offset by increase in distributions to unitholders of $23.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017.

Revolving Credit Facility

Our revolving credit facility will mature on November 19, 2019 and is available for working capital, capital expenditures, permitted acquisitions and general corporate purposes, including distributions. On December 28, 2017, we exercised our option to increase the available commitments under our revolving credit facility for an additional $23 million, resulting in aggregate commitments of $390 million under the revolving credit facility. Substantially all of our assets, excluding equity in and assets of certain joint ventures and unrestricted subsidiaries is pledged as collateral under our revolving credit facility.

Our revolving credit facility contains various covenants and restrictive provisions that limit our ability (as well as the ability of our restricted subsidiaries) to, among other things:

Our revolving credit facility also requires compliance with certain financial covenants as follows:

In addition, our revolving credit facility contains events of default including, but not limited to (i) event of default resulting from our failure or the failure of our restricted subsidiaries to comply with covenants and financial ratios, (ii) the occurrence of a change of control (as defined in the credit agreement), (iii) the institution of insolvency or similar proceedings against us or our restricted subsidiaries, (iv) the occurrence of a default under any other material indebtedness (as defined in the credit agreement) we or our restricted subsidiaries may have and (v) any one or more collateral documents ceasing to create a valid and perfected lien on collateral (as defined in the credit agreement). Upon the occurrence and during the continuation of an event of default, subject to the terms and conditions of the credit agreement, the lenders may declare any outstanding principal of our revolving credit facility debt, together with accrued and unpaid interest, to be immediately due and payable and may exercise the other remedies set forth or referred to in the credit agreement and the other loan documents.

47

---

Table of Contents 

 

Loans under our revolving credit facility bear interest at our option at a variable rate per annum equal to either:

As of June 30, 2018, we had $177 million of total outstanding indebtedness under our revolving credit facility with $213 million available under the revolving credit facility, subject to compliance with certain covenants. The Partnership was also in compliance with all covenants under its revolving credit facility at June 30, 2018.

Secured Notes

On June 6, 2018, the Partnership completed the 2018 Securitization involving certain wireless communication sites and related property interests owned by certain special purpose subsidiaries of the Partnership, through the issuance of the 2018 Secured Notes, in an aggregate principal amount of $125.4 million. The 2018 Secured Notes are obligations of certain special purpose subsidiaries of the Partnership, including the issuer of the 2018 Secured Notes, LMRK Issuer Co. III LLC (the “2018 Securitization Issuer”), and are not obligations of the Partnership or any of its other subsidiaries (including the obligors with respect to the 2018 Secured Notes). The assets and credit of such obligors are not available to satisfy the debts and obligations of the Partnership or any of its other affiliates (other than the obligors with respect to the 2018 Secured Notes).

On April 24, 2018, the Partnership entered into a note purchase and private shelf agreement pursuant to which the Partnership agreed to sell an initial $43.7 million aggregate principal amount of 4.38% Senior Secured Notes, in a private placement, and may from time to time issue and sell additional senior secured notes, in an aggregate principal amount when aggregated with the initial principal amount of up to $225 million. The 4.38% Senior Secured Notes are obligations of certain special purpose subsidiaries of the Partnership, including the issuer of the 4.38% Senior Secured Notes, LMRK PropCo SO LLC (the “4.38% Senior Secured Notes Issuer”), and are not obligations of the Partnership or any of its other subsidiaries (including the obligors with respect to the 4.38% Senior Secured Notes). The assets and credit of such obligors are not available to satisfy the debts and obligations of the Partnership or any of its other affiliates (other than the obligors with respect to the 4.38% Senior Secured Notes).

On November 30, 2017, the Partnership completed the 2017 Securitization involving certain outdoor advertising sites and related property interests owned by certain special purpose subsidiaries of the Partnership, through the issuance of the 2017 Secured Notes, in an aggregate principal amount of $80.0 million. The 2017 Secured Notes are obligations of certain special purpose subsidiaries of the Partnership, including the issuer of the 2017 Secured Notes, LMRK Issuer Co. 2 LLC (the “2017 Securitization Issuer”), and are not obligations of the Partnership or any of its other subsidiaries (including the obligors with respect to the 2016 Secured Notes). The assets and credit of such obligors are not available to satisfy the debts and obligations of the Partnership or any of its other affiliates (other than the obligors with respect to the 2017 Secured Notes).

On June 16, 2016, the Partnership completed the 2016 Securitization transaction involving certain wireless communication sites and related property interests owned by certain special purpose subsidiaries of the Partnership, through the issuance of the 2016 Secured Notes, in an aggregate principal amount of $116.6 million. The 2016 Secured Notes are obligations of certain special purpose subsidiaries of the Partnership, including the issuer of the 2016 Secured Notes, LMRK Issuer Co. LLC (the “2016 Securitization Issuer”), and are not obligations of the Partnership or any of its other subsidiaries (including the obligors with respect to the 2017 Secured Notes). The assets and credit of such obligors are not available to satisfy the debts and obligations of the Partnership or any of its other affiliates (other than the obligors with respect to the 2016 Secured Notes).

48

---

Table of Contents 

 

The secured notes described above were issued in separate classes as indicated in the table below. The Class B notes of the Series 2016-1 and Series 2017-1 are subordinated in right of payment to the Class A notes of such series. The Class F notes of the Series 2018-1 are subordinated in right of payment to the Class D notes and the Class D notes are subordinated in right of payment to the Class C notes of such series.

 

 

The Secured Notes are each secured by (1) mortgages and deeds of trust on substantially all of the tenant sites and their operating cash flows, (2) a security interest in substantially all of the personal property of the obligors (as defined in the applicable indenture), and (3) the rights of the obligors under a management agreement. Under the terms of the applicable indenture, the obligors will be permitted to issue additional notes under certain circumstances, including so long as the debt service coverage ratio (“DSCR”) of the issuer is at least 2.0 to 1.0 for the 2018 Secured Notes, 2017 Secured Notes and 2016 Secured Notes, respectively, and at least 1.1 to 1.0 for the 4.38% Senior Secured Notes.

Under the terms of the applicable indenture, amounts due under Secured Notes, as applicable, will be paid solely from the cash flows generated from the operation of the Secured Tenant Site Assets, as applicable, which must be deposited into reserve accounts, and thereafter distributed solely pursuant to the terms of the applicable indenture. On a monthly basis, after payment of all required amounts under the applicable indenture, subject to the conditions described in Note 7, Debt, the excess cash flows generated from the operation of such assets are released to the Partnership. On January 18, 2018, $16.0 million from the 2017 Secured Notes site acquisition account was used to acquire certain assets from Fund H. As of June 30, 2018, $6.6 million was held in such reserve accounts which are classified as Restricted Cash on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Certain information with respect to the Secured Notes is set forth in Note 7, Debt. The DSCR is generally calculated as the ratio of annualized net cash flow (as defined in the applicable indenture) to the amount of interest, servicing fees and trustee fees required to be paid over the succeeding 12 months on the principal amount of the Secured Notes, as applicable, that will be outstanding on the payment date following such date of determination. As of June 30, 2018, the DSCR for the 2018 Securitization, 2017 Securitization and 2016 Securitization is above 2.0, respectively, and above 1.1 for the 4.38% Senior Secured Notes.

Each indenture includes covenants customary for notes issued in rated securitizations. Among other things, the related obligors are prohibited from incurring other indebtedness for borrowed money or further encumbering their assets (as defined in the applicable agreement) and the organizational documents of the related obligors were amended to contain certain provisions consistent with rating agency securitization criteria for special purposes entities, including that the applicable issuer and guarantor maintain independent directors. As of June 30, 2018, the applicable obligors were in compliance with all financial covenants under the Secured Notes.

Shelf Registrations

On February 16, 2016, the Partnership filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-4 with the SEC. The shelf registration statement was declared effective on March 10, 2016 and permits us to offer and issue, from time to time, an aggregate of up to 5,000,000 Common Units in connection with the acquisition by us or our subsidiaries of other businesses, assets or securities.

49

---

Table of Contents 

 

On February 23, 2017, the Partnership filed a universal shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC. The shelf registration statement was declared effective by the SEC on March 27, 2017 and permits us to issue and sell, from time to time, common and preferred units representing limited partner interests in us, and debt securities up to an aggregate amount of $750.0 million.

Preferred Offering

On April 2, 2018, the Partnership completed a public offering of 2,000,000 Series C Floating-to-Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Redeemable Convertible Preferred Units (“Series C Preferred Units”), representing limited partner interest in the Partnership, at a price of $25.00 per unit. We received net proceeds of approximately $47.5 million after deducting underwriters’ discounts and offering expenses paid by us of $2.5 million. We used substantially all net proceeds to repay a portion of the borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

Distributions on the Series C Preferred Units will be the 15th day of February, May, August and November of each year. The prorated initial distribution on the Series C Preferred Units was paid on May 15, 2018 in an amount equal to $0.2090 per Series C Preferred Unit. Distributions for the Series C Preferred Units will accrue from, and including the date of original issuance, to, but excluding, May 15, 2025, at an annual rate equal to the greater of (i) 7.00% per annum and (ii) the sum of (a) the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) as calculated on each applicable date of determination and (b) 4.698% per annum, based on the $25.00 liquidation preference per Series C Preferred Unit. On and after May 15, 2025, distributions on the Series C Preferred Units will accrue at 9.00% per annum of the $25.000 liquidation preference per Series C Preferred Unit (equal to $2.25 per Series C Preferred Unit per annum). The Partnership shall have the option to redeem the Series C Preferred Units, in whole or in part, on or after May 20, 2025 at the liquidation preference of $25.00 per Series C Preferred Unit, plus an amount equal to all accumulated and unpaid distributions thereon to the date of redemption, whether or not declared.

ATM Programs

On February 16, 2016, the Partnership established a Common Unit at-the-market offering program (the “Common Unit ATM Program”) pursuant to which we may sell, from time to time, Common Units having an aggregate offering price of up to $50.0 million, pursuant to our previously filed and effective registration statement on Form S-3. On June 24, 2016, the Partnership established a Series A Preferred Unit at-the-market offering program (the “Series A Preferred Unit ATM Program”) pursuant to which we may sell, from time to time, Series A Preferred Units having an aggregate offering price of up to $40.0 million pursuant to our previously filed and effective registration statement on Form S-3. On March 30, 2017, the Partnership established a Series B Preferred Unit at-the-market offering program (the “Series B Preferred Unit ATM Program” and together with the Series A Preferred Unit Program and the Common Unit ATM Program the “ATM Programs”) pursuant to which we may sell, from time to time, Series B Preferred Units having an aggregate offering price of up to $50.0 million pursuant to our previously filed and effective registration statement on Form S-3. We intend to use the net proceeds from any sales pursuant to the ATM Programs for general partnership purposes, which may include, among other things, the repayment of indebtedness and to potentially fund future acquisitions.

During the six months ended June 30, 2018, the Partnership issued a total of 27,830 Common Units and 24,747 Series A Preferred Units under the ATM Programs generating total proceeds of approximately $1.1 million before issuance costs.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

In connection with the issuance of the 4.38% Senior Secured Notes, the Partnership has a standby letter of credit arrangement totaling $2.4 million. As of June 30, 2018, there were no amounts drawn on the standby letter of credit.

As of June 30, 2018, we do not have any other off balance sheet arrangements.

Inflation

Substantially all of our tenant lease arrangements are triple net or effectively triple-net and provide for fixed‑rate escalators or rent escalators tied to increases in the consumer price index. We believe that inflationary increases may be at least partially offset by the contractual rent increases and our tenants’ (or the underlying property owners’) obligations to pay taxes and expenses under our triple net or effectively triple-net lease arrangements. We do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our historical financial position or results of operations.

50

---

Table of Contents 

 

Newly Issued Accounting Standards

See Note 2, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the impact of new accounting standards.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our future income, cash flow and fair values relevant to financial instruments are impacted by prevailing market interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. In the future, we may continue to use derivative financial instruments to manage, or hedge, interest rate risks related to our borrowings. Our primary market risk exposure will be interest rate risk with respect to our expected indebtedness.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to risks arising from rising interest rates. As of June 30, 2018, our revolving credit facility had an outstanding balance of $177 million. Additional borrowings under our revolving credit facility will have variable LIBOR‑based rates and will fluctuate based on the underlying LIBOR rate. As of June 30, 2018, we have hedged $195 million of the LIBOR rate on our revolving credit facility through interest rate swap agreements.

The distributions on the Series C Preferred Units are based on a rate equal to the greater of (i) 7.00% per annum, and (ii) the sum of (a) three-month LIBOR as calculated on each applicable date of determination and (b) 4.698% per annum, based on the $25.00 liquidation preference per Series C Preferred Unit. As of June 30, 2018, there were 2,000,000 Series C Preferred Units outstanding.

Interest risk amounts represent our management’s estimates and were determined by considering the effect of hypothetical interest rates on our financial instruments. These analyses do not consider the effect of any change in overall economic activity that could occur in that environment. Further, in the event of a change of that magnitude, we may take actions to further mitigate our exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, these analyses assume no changes in our financial structure.

Rising interest rates could limit our ability to refinance our debt when it matures or cause us to pay higher interest rates upon refinancing and increase interest expense on refinanced indebtedness. We intend to hedge interest rate risks related to a portion of our borrowings over time by means of interest rate swap agreements or other arrangements.

Foreign Currency Risk

As we expand to internal markets we are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We currently do not use derivative financial instruments to mitigate foreign currency risk. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, approximately 5% of rental revenue was denominated in foreign currencies, respectively. In the future, we may utilize derivative instruments to manage the risk of fluctuations in foreign currency rates related to the potential impact these changes could have on future earnings and forecasted cash flows. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies that are translated into U.S. dollars use exchange rates in effect at the end of the period, and revenues and expenses denominated in foreign currencies that are translated into U.S. dollars use average rates of exchange in effect during the related period. The cumulative translation effect is included in equity as a component of AOCI.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management has evaluated, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report, and has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2018.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

51

---

Table of Contents 

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Although we may, from time to time, be involved in litigation and claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of business, we are not a party to any litigation or governmental or other proceeding that we believe will have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the various agreements under which we acquired assets from Landmark and affiliates, Landmark and affiliates will indemnify us for certain losses resulting from any breach of their representations, warranties or covenants contained in the various agreements, subject to certain limitations and survival periods.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

There are no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

52

---

Table of Contents 

 

Item 6. Exhibits

 

 

*Filed herewith.

53

---

Table of Contents 

 

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of El Segundo, State of California, on August 1, 2018.

 

 

54