Attached files

file filename
EX-31.2 - RULE 13A-14(A) CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER - SOUTHERN FIRST BANCSHARES INCsfb3452781-ex312.htm
EX-32 - SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS - SOUTHERN FIRST BANCSHARES INCsfb3452781-ex32.htm
EX-31.1 - RULE 13A-14(A) CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER - SOUTHERN FIRST BANCSHARES INCsfb3452781-ex311.htm

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

☒  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2018
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transition Period from          to         
Commission file number 000-27719

Southern First Bancshares, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

South Carolina       58-2459561
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     
100 Verdae Boulevard, Suite 100
Greenville, S.C. 29606
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

864-679-9000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

      Large accelerated filer             Accelerated filer      
  Non-accelerated filer    (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)   Smaller Reporting Company  
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 7,425,672 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, were issued and outstanding as of July 26, 2018.


SOUTHERN FIRST BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
June 30, 2018 Form 10-Q

INDEX

PART I – CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION       Page
  
Item 1.       Consolidated Financial Statements
  
Consolidated Balance Sheets 3
 
Consolidated Statements of Income 4
 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income 5
 
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity 6
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 7
 
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements 8
 
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 28
    
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 45
 
Item 4. Controls and Procedures 45
  
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 45
 
Item 1A. Risk Factors 45
 
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 45
 
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities 45
 
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 45
 
Item 5. Other Information 45
  
Item 6. Exhibits 45

2


PART I. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SOUTHERN FIRST BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

         
June 30, December 31,
(dollars in thousands, except share data)       2018       2017
(Unaudited) (Audited)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and due from banks $ 17,198 17,171
Federal funds sold 62,854 49,148
Interest-bearing deposits with banks 29,301 25,846
Total cash and cash equivalents 109,353 92,165
Investment securities:
Investment securities available for sale 70,067 67,603
Other investments 3,059 4,462
Total investment securities 73,126 72,065
Mortgage loans held for sale 8,075 11,790
Loans 1,533,447 1,387,070
Less allowance for loan losses (16,100 ) (15,523 )
Loans, net 1,517,347 1,371,547
Bank owned life insurance 33,573 33,132
Property and equipment, net 32,720 32,234
Deferred income taxes 6,069 3,782
Other assets 7,521 7,910
Total assets $ 1,787,784 1,624,625
LIABILITIES
Deposits $ 1,567,982 1,381,123
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings 28,600 67,200
Junior subordinated debentures 13,403 13,403
Other liabilities 16,943 13,213
Total liabilities 1,626,928 1,474,939
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding - -
Common stock, par value $.01 per share, 10,000,000 shares authorized, 7,425,672 and 7,347,851 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively 74 73
Nonvested restricted stock (853 ) (502 )
Additional paid-in capital 101,691 99,986
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (1,365 ) (456 )
Retained earnings 61,309 50,585
Total shareholders’ equity 160,856 149,686
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $      1,787,784         1,624,625

See notes to consolidated financial statements that are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

3


SOUTHERN FIRST BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)

         
For the three months For the six months
ended June 30, ended June 30,
(dollars in thousands, except share data)       2018       2017       2018       2017
Interest income
Loans $ 17,591 14,280 34,154 27,806
Investment securities 430 390 798 766
Federal funds sold 514 261 761 318
Total interest income 18,535 14,931 35,713 28,890
Interest expense
Deposits 3,524 1,739 6,263 2,989
Borrowings 399 840 797 1,942
Total interest expense 3,923 2,579 7,060 4,931
Net interest income 14,612 12,352 28,653 23,959
Provision for loan losses 400 500 900 1,000
Net interest income after provision for loan losses 14,212 11,852 27,753 22,959
Noninterest income
Mortgage banking income 1,629 1,603 2,957 2,660
Service fees on deposit accounts 256 284 512 561
ATM and debit card income 371 290 705 552
Income from bank owned life insurance 220 183 441 366
Other income 295 202 577 475
Total noninterest income 2,771 2,562 5,192 4,614
Noninterest expenses
Compensation and benefits 6,365 5,524 12,208 10,798
Occupancy 1,276 1,033 2,413 1,999
Outside service and data processing costs 824 823 1,560 1,568
Insurance 297 297 610 587
Professional fees 457 382 933 695
Marketing 229 196 438 407
Other 531 507 1,022 1,069
Total noninterest expenses 9,979 8,762 19,184 17,123
Income before income tax expense 7,004 5,652 13,761 10,450
Income tax expense 1,494 2,048 3,037 3,734
Net income available to common shareholders $ 5,510 3,604 10,724 6,716
Earnings per common share
Basic $ 0.75 0.52 1.46 1.00
Diluted $ 0.71 0.49 1.39 0.95
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic 7,370,709 6,986,948 7,353,867 6,713,608
Diluted      7,751,146      7,366,208      7,739,082      7,099,381

See notes to consolidated financial statements that are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

4


SOUTHERN FIRST BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)

         
For the three months For the six months
ended June 30, ended June 30,
(dollars in thousands)       2018       2017       2018       2017
Net income $      5,510 3,604 10,724 6,716
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale:
Unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period, pretax (234 ) 258 (1,150 ) 496
Tax (expense) benefit 51 (89 ) 240 (170 )
Unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period, pretax - (2 ) 1 (2 )
Tax expense - - - -
Other comprehensive income (loss) (183 ) 167 (909 ) 324
Comprehensive income $ 5,327 3,771 9,815 7,040

See notes to consolidated financial statements that are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

5


SOUTHERN FIRST BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2018 AND 2017
(Unaudited)

                                                  
                    Accumulated      
Nonvested Additional other
Common stock Preferred stock restricted paid-in comprehensive Retained
(dollars in thousands, except share data) Shares Amount Shares Amount stock capital income (loss) earnings Total
December 31, 2016 6,463,789 65 - - (600 ) 73,371 (504 ) 37,540 109,872
Net income - - - - - - - 6,716 6,716
Net issuance of common stock 805,000 - - - - 24,750 - - 24,758
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 42,267 8 - - - 416 - - 416
Issuance of restricted stock 3,125 - - - (146 ) 146 - - -
Amortization of deferred compensation on restricted stock - - - - 159 - - - 159
Compensation expense related to stock options, net of tax - - - - - 491 - - 491
Other comprehensive income - - - - - - 324 - 324
June 30, 2017 7,314,181 $ 73 - $ - $      (587 ) $ 99,174 $             (180 ) 44,256 142,736
December 31, 2017 7,347,851 73 - - (502 ) 99,986 (456 ) 50,585 149,686
Net income - - - - - - - 10,724 10,724
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 66,321 1 - - - 637 - - 638
Issuance of restricted stock 11,500 - - - (501 ) 501 - - -
Amortization of deferred compensation on restricted stock - - - - 150 - - - 150
Compensation expense related to stock options, net of tax - - - - - 567 - - 567
Other comprehensive income - - - - - - (909 ) - (909 )
June 30, 2018 7,425,672 $ 74 - $ - $ (853 ) $ 101,691 $ (1,365 ) 61,309 160,856

See notes to consolidated financial statements that are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

6


SOUTHERN FIRST BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

     
    For the six months ended June 30,
(dollars in thousands) 2018     2017
Operating activities
Net income $ 10,724 $ 6,716
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by (used for) operating activities:
Provision for loan losses 900 1,000
Depreciation and other amortization 850 669
Accretion and amortization of securities discounts and premium, net 220 267
(Gain) loss on sale of investment securities available for sale 1 (2 )
Gain on sale of real estate owned (7 ) (12 )
(Gain) loss on disposal of fixed assets (8 ) 50
Write-down of real estate owned - 7
Compensation expense related to stock options and grants 717 650
Gain on sale of loans held for sale (2,620 ) (2,854 )
Loans originated and held for sale      (109,193 ) (94,159 )
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale 115,528 93,334
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance (441 ) (366 )
Increase in deferred tax asset (2,045 ) (392 )
Decrease in other assets, net 264 109
Increase in other liabilities 3,730 694
Net cash provided by operating activities 18,620 5,711
Investing activities
Increase (decrease) in cash realized from:
Origination of loans, net (146,700 )    (136,760 )
Purchase of property and equipment (1,328 ) (4,043 )
Purchase of investment securities:
Available for sale (13,904 ) (20,675 )
Other (2,596 ) (1,811 )
Payments and maturities, calls and repayments of investment securities:
Available for sale 4,227 4,002
Other 3,999 3,522
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available for sale 5,841 -
Proceeds from sale of real estate owned 132 380
Net cash used for investing activities (150,329 ) (155,385 )
Financing activities
Increase (decrease) in cash realized from:
Increase in deposits, net 186,859 206,760
Decrease in Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings (38,600 ) (42,000 )
Proceeds from issuance of common stock - 24,758
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants 638 416
Net cash provided by financing activities 148,897 189,934
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 17,188 40,260
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period 92,165 46,552
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period $ 109,353 $ 86,812
Supplemental information
Cash paid for
Interest $ 6,764 $ 4,891
Income taxes 1,960 3,410
Schedule of non-cash transactions
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans - 164
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities, net of income taxes (909 ) 324

See notes to consolidated financial statements that are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

7


SOUTHERN FIRST BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 – Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation

Business Activity
Southern First Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") is a South Carolina corporation that owns all of the capital stock of Southern First Bank (the "Bank") and all of the stock of Greenville First Statutory Trust I and II (collectively, the "Trusts"). The Trusts are special purpose non-consolidated entities organized for the sole purpose of issuing trust preferred securities. The Bank's primary federal regulator is the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC"). The Bank is also regulated and examined by the South Carolina Board of Financial Institutions. The Bank is primarily engaged in the business of accepting demand deposits and savings deposits insured by the FDIC, and providing commercial, consumer and mortgage loans to the general public.

Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2018. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2018. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the Bank. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810, “Consolidation,” the financial statements related to the Trusts have not been consolidated.

Business Segments
In determining proper segment definition, the Company considers the materiality of a potential segment and components of the business about which financial information is available and regularly evaluated, relative to a resource allocation and performance assessment. The Company accounts for intersegment revenues and expenses as if the revenue/expense transactions were generated to third parties, that is, at current market prices. Please refer to “Note 9 – Reportable Segments” for further information on the reporting for the Company’s three business segments.

Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amount of income and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, real estate acquired in the settlement of loans, fair value of financial instruments, evaluating other-than-temporary-impairment of investment securities and valuation of deferred tax assets.

Reclassifications
Certain amounts, previously reported, have been reclassified to state all periods on a comparable basis and had no effect on shareholders’ equity or net income.

Subsequent Events
Subsequent events are events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. Recognized subsequent events are events or transactions that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet, including the estimates inherent in the process of preparing financial statements. Non-recognized subsequent events are events that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet but arose after that date. Management performed an evaluation to determine whether there have been any subsequent events since the balance sheet date and determined that no subsequent events occurred requiring accrual or disclosure.

8


Revenue from Contracts with Customers
The Company records revenue from contracts with customers in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“Topic 606”). Under Topic 606, the Company must identify the contract with a customer, identify the performance obligations in the contract, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and recognize revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies a performance obligation. Significant revenue has not been recognized in the current reporting period that results from performance obligations satisfied in previous periods.

The Company’s primary sources of revenue are derived from interest and dividends earned on loans, investment securities, and other financial instruments that are not within the scope of Topic 606. The Company has evaluated the nature of its contracts with customers and determined that further disaggregation of revenue from contracts with customers into more granular categories beyond what is presented in the Consolidated Statements of Income was not necessary. The Company generally fully satisfies its performance obligations on its contracts with customers as services are rendered and the transaction prices are typically fixed; charged either on a periodic basis or based on activity. Our accounting policies will not change materially since the principles of revenue recognition from the Accounting Standards Update are largely consistent with existing guidance and current practices applied by our business. The following is a discussion of revenues within the scope of the new guidance:

Service fees on deposit accounts - The Company earns fees from its deposit clients for various transaction-based, account maintenance, and overdraft or non-sufficient funds (“NSF”) services. Transaction-based fees, which include services such as stop payment charges, statement rendering, and ACH fees, are recognized at the time the transaction is executed as that is the point in time the Company fulfills the client's request. Account maintenance fees, which relate primarily to monthly maintenance and account management, are earned over the course of a month, representing the period over which the Company satisfies the performance obligation. Overdraft and NSF fees are recognized at the point in time that the overdraft occurs or the NSF item is presented. Service charges on deposits are withdrawn from the client's account balance.
ATM and debit card income - The Company earns interchange fees from debit cardholder transactions conducted through the payment networks. Interchange fees from cardholder transactions represent a percentage of the underlying transaction value and are recognized daily, concurrently with the transaction processing services provided to the cardholder.

Income Taxes
On December 22, 2017, the United States enacted tax reform legislation commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”), resulting in significant modifications to existing law. Authoritative guidance and interpretation by regulatory bodies is ongoing, and as such, the accounting for the effects of the Tax Act is not final and the full impact of the new regulation is still being evaluated. The accounting is expected to be complete when the 2017 U.S. corporate income tax return is filed later in 2018.

Adoption of New Accounting Standards
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”), which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU replaces most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP. The new standard was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. Adoption of ASU 2014-09 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures as the Company’s primary sources of revenues are derived from interest and dividends earned on loans, investment securities, and other financial instruments that are not within the scope of ASU 2014-09. The Company’s revenue recognition pattern for revenue streams within the scope of ASU 2014-09, including but not limited to service charges on deposit accounts and gains/losses on the sale of other real estate owned, did not change significantly from current practice. The standard permits the use of either the full retrospective or modified retrospective transition method. The Company elected to use the modified retrospective transition method which requires application of ASU 2014-09 to uncompleted contracts at the date of adoption however, periods prior to the date of adoption will not be retrospectively revised as the impact of the ASU on uncompleted contracts at the date of adoption was not material.

9


In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“ASU 2016-01”). The guidance affects the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option and the presentation and disclosure requirements of financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018 and resulted in the use of an exit price rather than an entrance price to determine the fair value of loans not measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 7 – Fair Value Accounting for further information regarding the valuation of these loans.

In February 2018, the FASB Issued (ASU 2018-02), Income Statement (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which requires companies to reclassify the stranded effects in other comprehensive income to retained earnings as a result of the change in the tax rates under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The Company has opted to early adopt this pronouncement by retrospective application to each period (or periods) in which the effect of the change in the tax rate under the Tax Act is recognized. The impact of the reclassification from other comprehensive income to retained earnings did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

Newly Issued, But Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”). The FASB issued this ASU to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under current U.S. GAAP and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early application of this ASU is permitted for all entities. Adoption of ASU 2016-02 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company leases certain properties under operating leases that will result in the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the Company’s balance sheet under the ASU. At June 30, 2018, the Company had contractual future minimum lease commitments of approximately $14.6 million, before considering renewal options that are generally present.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (“ASU 2016-13”). Among other things, ASU 2016-13 requires the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to form their credit loss estimates. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied today will still be permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. In addition, ASU 2016-13 amends the accounting for credit losses on debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The amendments in ASU 2016-13 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2019, and interim periods within those years for public business entities that are SEC filers. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018, however, the Company does not currently plan to early adopt the ASU. We are evaluating the impact of the ASU on our consolidated financial statements. In addition to our allowance for loan losses, we will also record an allowance for credit losses on debt securities instead of applying the impairment model currently utilized. The amount of the adjustments will be impacted by each portfolio’s composition and credit quality at the adoption date as well as economic conditions and forecasts at that time.

In March 2017, the FASB amended the requirement in the Receivables-Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs Topic of the Accounting Standards Codification related to the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. The amendments shorten the amortization period for the premium to the earliest call date. The amendments will be effective for the Company for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial statements.

In February 2018, the FASB amended the Financial Instruments Topic of the Accounting Standards Codification. The amendments clarify certain aspects of the guidance issued in ASU 2016-01. The amendments will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2018. The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial statements.

10


Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

NOTE 2 – Investment Securities

The amortized costs and fair value of investment securities are as follows:

     
    June 30, 2018
Amortized     Gross Unrealized     Fair
(dollars in thousands) Cost Gains Losses Value
Available for sale
US government agencies $ 8,987 1 274 8,714
SBA securities 3,904 - 135 3,769
State and political subdivisions 8,530 49 107 8,472
Asset-backed securities 6,703 3 15 6,691
Mortgage-backed securities
FHLMC 8,401 - 327 8,074
FNMA 32,089 2 780 31,311
GNMA 3,181 1 146 3,036
Total mortgage-backed securities 43,671 3 1,253 42,421
Total investment securities available for sale $ 71,795 56 1,784 70,067
 
December 31, 2017
Amortized Gross Unrealized Fair
Cost Gains     Losses Value
Available for sale
US government agencies $ 8,749 1 97 8,653
SBA securities 4,087 - 24 4,063
State and political subdivisions 11,242 179 25 11,396
Mortgage-backed securities
FHLMC 9,102 - 149 8,953
FNMA 29,383 3 386 29,000
GNMA 5,618 2 82 5,538
Total mortgage-backed securities 44,103 5 617 43,491
Total investment securities available for sale $      68,181 185 763 67,603

During the first six months of 2018, there were $5.8 million of investment securities sold, resulting in a loss on sale of $1,000. During the first six months of 2017, there were $415,000 of investment securities either sold or called, subsequently resulting in a gain on sale of $2,000.

Contractual maturities and yields on the Company’s investment securities at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are shown in the following table. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

11



 
June 30, 2018
Less than one year One to five years Five to ten years Over ten years Total
(dollars in thousands)     Amount     Yield     Amount     Yield     Amount     Yield     Amount     Yield     Amount     Yield
Available for sale
US government agencies $    - - 2,641 2.12% 6,073 2.74% - - 8,714 2.55%
SBA securities - - - - - - 3,769 2.60% 3,769 2.60%
State and political subdivisions - - 514 2.14% 4,514 3.11% 3,444 2.83% 8,472 2.94%
Asset-backed securities - - - - - - 6,691 2.89% 6,691 2.89%
Mortgage-backed securities 115      0.31% 790 1.94%   12,101 1.86% 29,415 2.53% 42,421 2.40%
Total $ 115 0.31%      3,945      2.09% 22,688      2.34%        43,319      2.61%      70,067      2.49%
 
December 31, 2017
Less than one year One to five years Five to ten years Over ten years Total
Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield
Available for sale
US government agencies $ 995 1.15% 1,503 2.04% 6,155 2.40% - - 8,653 2.20%
SBA securities - - - - - - 4,063 2.45% 4,063 2.45%
State and political subdivisions - - 1,163 1.96% 7,162 2.84% 3,071 2.76%   11,396 2.73%
Mortgage-backed securities 432 0.99% - - 11,328 1.84%   31,731 2.06%   43,491 1.99%
Total $ 1,427 1.10% 2,666 1.59% 24,645 2.27%   38,865 2.15% 67,603 2.17%

The tables below summarize gross unrealized losses on investment securities and the fair market value of the related securities at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.

     
June 30, 2018
    Less than 12 months           12 months or longer               Total
Fair   Unrealized Fair     Unrealized     Fair   Unrealized
(dollars in thousands) # value     losses # value losses # value losses
Available for sale
US government agencies 6 $    5,336 $    118 3 $    2,878 $    156 9 $    8,214 $    274
SBA securities 1 2,759 106 1 1,010 29 2 3,769 135
State and political subdivisions 7 4,747 71 2 769 36 9 5,516 107
Asset-backed securities 3 4,851 15 - - - 3 4,851 15
Mortgage-backed securities
FHLMC 3 2,610 90 7 5,464 237 10 8,074 327
FNMA 12 14,882 297 16 16,386 483 28 31,268 780
GNMA 1 1,223 59 2 1,792 87 3 3,015 146
Total 33 $ 36,408 $ 756 31 $  28,299 $ 1,028 64 $ 64,707 $ 1,784
 
December 31, 2017
Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total
Fair   Unrealized Fair   Unrealized     Fair   Unrealized
# value losses # value losses # value losses
Available for sale
US government agencies 5 $ 4,184 $ 22 4 $ 3,968 $ 75 9 $ 8,152 $ 97
SBA securities 1 2,936 13 1 1,127 11 2 4,063 24
State and political subdivisions 3 1,214 9 2 792 16 5 2,006 25
Mortgage-backed securities
FHLMC 3 2,897 26 7 6,056 123 10 8,953 149
FNMA 11 14,345 135 13 14,597 251 24 28,942 386
GNMA 2 2,270 40 1 971 42 3 3,241 82
Total 25 $ 27,846 $  245   28 $ 27,511 $ 518 53 $ 55,357 $ 763

12


At June 30, 2018, the Company had 33 individual investments with a fair market value of $36.4 million that were in an unrealized loss position for less than 12 months and 31 individual investments with a fair market value of $28.3 million that were in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or longer. The unrealized losses were primarily attributable to changes in interest rates, rather than deterioration in credit quality. The individual securities are each investment grade securities. The Company considers the length of time and extent to which the fair value of available-for-sale debt securities have been less than cost to conclude that such securities are not other-than-temporarily impaired. The Company also considers other factors such as the financial condition of the issuer, including credit ratings and specific events affecting the operations of the issuer, volatility of the security, underlying assets that collateralize the debt security, and other industry and macroeconomic conditions.

As the Company has no intent to sell securities with unrealized losses and it is not more-likely-than-not that the Company will be required to sell these securities before recovery of amortized cost, the Company has concluded that these securities are not impaired on an other-than-temporary basis.

Other investments are comprised of the following and are recorded at cost which approximates fair value.

         
(dollars in thousands)       June 30, 2018       December 31, 2017
Federal Home Loan Bank stock $      2,524 3,754
Investment in Trust Preferred securities 403 403
Other investments 132 305
Total other investments $ 3,059 4,462

The Company has evaluated the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock for impairment and determined that the investment in the FHLB stock is not other than temporarily impaired as of June 30, 2018 and ultimate recoverability of the par value of this investment is probable. All of the FHLB stock is used to collateralize advances with the FHLB.

At June 30, 2018, $4.2 million of securities were pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements from brokers and no securities were pledged to secure client deposits. At December 31, 2017, $7.7 million of securities were pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements from brokers.

NOTE 3 – Mortgage Loans Held for Sale

Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are reported as loans held for sale and carried at fair value under the fair value option with changes in fair value recognized in current period earnings. At the date of funding of the mortgage loan held for sale, the funded amount of the loan, the related derivative asset or liability of the associated interest rate lock commitment, less direct loan costs becomes the initial recorded investment in the loan held for sale. Such amount approximates the fair value of the loan. At June 30, 2018, mortgage loans held for sale totaled $8.1 million compared to $11.8 million at December 31, 2017.

Mortgage loans held for sale are considered de-recognized, or sold, when the Company surrenders control over the financial assets. Control is considered to have been surrendered when the transferred assets have been isolated from the Company, beyond the reach of the Company and its creditors; the purchaser obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets; and the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement that both entitles and obligates the Company to repurchase or redeem the transferred assets before their maturity or the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return specific assets.

Gains and losses from the sale of mortgage loans are recognized based upon the difference between the sales proceeds and carrying value of the related loans upon sale and are recorded in mortgage banking income in the statement of income. Mortgage banking income also includes the gains and losses associated with the loans held for sale and the gains and losses from derivatives.

Mortgage loans sold by the Company to investors and which were believed to have met investor and agency underwriting guidelines at the time of sale may be subject to repurchase or indemnification in the event of specific default by the borrower or subsequent discovery that underwriting standards were not met. The Company may, upon mutual agreement, agree to repurchase the loans or indemnify the investor against future losses on such loans. In such cases, the Company bears any subsequent credit loss on the loans.

13


The Company establishes mortgage repurchase reserves related to various representations and warranties that reflect management’s estimate of losses based on a combination of factors. The Company establishes a reserve at the time loans are sold and quarterly updates the reserve estimate during the estimated loan life.

NOTE 4 – Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

The following table summarizes the composition of our loan portfolio. Total gross loans are recorded net of deferred loan fees and costs, which totaled $2.7 million as of June 30, 2018 and $2.3 million as of December 31, 2017.

 
      June 30, 2018       December 31, 2017
(dollars in thousands) Amount       % of Total Amount       % of Total
Commercial
Owner occupied RE $      358,169 23.4% $      316,818 22.8%
Non-owner occupied RE 355,309 23.2% 312,798 22.6%
Construction 73,655 4.8% 51,179 3.7%
Business 238,402 15.5% 226,158 16.3%
Total commercial loans 1,025,535 66.9% 906,953 65.4%
Consumer
Real estate 290,433 18.9% 273,050 19.7%
Home equity 156,630 10.2% 156,141 11.3%
Construction 38,400 2.5% 28,351 2.0%
Other 22,449 1.5% 22,575 1.6%
Total consumer loans 507,912 33.1% 480,117 34.6%
Total gross loans, net of deferred fees 1,533,447      100.0% 1,387,070      100.0%
Less—allowance for loan losses (16,100 ) (15,523 )
Total loans, net $ 1,517,347 $ 1,371,547

Maturities and Sensitivity of Loans to Changes in Interest Rates
The information in the following tables summarizes the loan maturity distribution by type and related interest rate characteristics based on the contractual maturities of individual loans, including loans which may be subject to renewal at their contractual maturity. Renewal of such loans is subject to review and credit approval, as well as modification of terms upon maturity. Actual repayments of loans may differ from the maturities reflected below, because borrowers have the right to prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties.

                         
June 30, 2018
After one
One year but within After five
(dollars in thousands) or less five years years Total
Commercial
Owner occupied RE $      27,294 163,994 166,881 358,169
Non-owner occupied RE 37,270 182,889 135,150 355,309
Construction 17,024 21,813 34,818 73,655
Business 66,961 123,166 48,275 238,402
Total commercial loans 148,549      491,862      385,124 1,025,535
Consumer
Real estate 32,872 62,050 195,511 290,433
Home equity 9,518 28,079 119,033 156,630
Construction 21,089 882 16,429 38,400
Other 7,584 10,169 4,696 22,449
Total consumer loans 71,063 101,180 335,669 507,912
Total gross loans, net of deferred fees $ 219,612 593,042 720,793 1,533,447
Loans maturing after one year with:
Fixed interest rates $    999,311
Floating interest rates 314,524

14



               
                  December 31, 2017
After one      
One year but within After five
(dollars in thousands) or less five years years Total
Commercial
Owner occupied RE $      24,171 167,425 125,222 316,818
Non-owner occupied RE 39,519 165,764 107,515 312,798
Construction 13,086 12,796 25,297 51,179
Business 73,588 107,584 44,986 226,158
Total commercial loans 150,364 453,569 303,020 906,953
Consumer
Real estate 30,172 61,809 181,069 273,050
Home equity 13,331 25,807 117,003 156,141
Construction 14,943 1,737 11,671 28,351
Other 7,203 11,371 4,001 22,575
Total consumer 65,649 100,724 313,744 480,117
Total gross loan, net of deferred fees $ 216,013      554,293      616,764 1,387,070
Loans maturing after one year with :
Fixed interest rates $    875,991
Floating interest rates 295,066

Portfolio Segment Methodology

Commercial
Commercial loans are assessed for estimated losses by grading each loan using various risk factors identified through periodic reviews. The Company applies historic grade-specific loss factors to each loan class. In the development of statistically derived loan grade loss factors, the Company observes historical losses over 20 quarters for each loan grade. These loss estimates are adjusted as appropriate based on additional analysis of external loss data or other risks identified from current economic conditions and credit quality trends. The allowance also includes an amount for the estimated impairment on nonaccrual commercial loans and commercial loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”), whether on accrual or nonaccrual status.

Consumer
For consumer loans, the Company determines the allowance on a collective basis utilizing historical losses over 20 quarters to represent its best estimate of inherent loss. The Company pools loans, generally by loan class with similar risk characteristics. The allowance also includes an amount for the estimated impairment on nonaccrual consumer loans and consumer loans modified in a TDR, whether on accrual or nonaccrual status.

Credit Quality Indicators

Commercial
We manage a consistent process for assessing commercial loan credit quality by monitoring its loan grading trends and past due statistics. All loans are subject to individual risk assessment. Our risk categories include Pass, Special Mention, Substandard, and Doubtful, each of which is defined by our banking regulatory agencies. Delinquency statistics are also an important indicator of credit quality in the establishment of our allowance for credit losses.

We categorize our loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of the borrower to service their debt such as current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. A description of the general characteristics of the risk grades is as follows:

Pass—These loans range from minimal credit risk to average however still acceptable credit risk.

15


Special mention—A special mention loan has potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or the institution’s credit position at some future date.

   

Substandard—A substandard loan is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified must have a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses, that may jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. A substandard loan is characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

   

Doubtful—A doubtful loan has all of the weaknesses inherent in one classified as substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of the currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable.

The tables below provide a breakdown of outstanding commercial loans by risk category.

                             
      June 30, 2018
Owner Non-owner
(dollars in thousands) occupied RE occupied RE Construction Business Total
Pass $      354,276 349,819      73,655      231,214      1,008,964
Special mention 1,644 1,523 - 3,579 6,746
Substandard 2,249 3,967 - 3,609 9,825
Doubtful - - - - -
$ 358,169      355,309 73,655 238,402 1,025,535
  
December 31, 2017
Owner Non-owner
occupied RE occupied RE Construction Business Total
Pass $ 312,628 306,965 51,179 215,729 886,501
Special mention 1,770 2,082 - 5,540 9,392
Substandard 2,420 3,751 - 4,889 11,060
Doubtful - - - - -
$ 316,818 312,798 51,179 226,158 906,953

The following tables provide past due information for outstanding commercial loans and include loans on nonaccrual status as well as accruing TDRs.

                             
June 30, 2018
Owner Non-owner
(dollars in thousands) occupied RE occupied RE Construction Business Total
Current $      357,261 354,718      73,655      237,790      1,023,424
30-59 days past due 908 398 - 519 1,825
60-89 days past due - - - - -
Greater than 90 Days - 193 - 93 286
$ 358,169      355,309 73,655 238,402 1,025,535
 
December 31, 2017
Owner Non-owner
occupied RE occupied RE Construction Business Total
Current $ 316,818 312,477 51,179 224,861 905,335
30-59 days past due - 129 - 416 545
60-89 days past due - - - - -
Greater than 90 Days - 192 - 881 1,073
$ 316,818 312,798 51,179 226,158 906,953

16


As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, loans 30 days or more past due represented 0.24% and 0.34% of the Company’s total loan portfolio, respectively. Commercial loans 30 days or more past due were 0.14% and 0.11% of the Company’s total loan portfolio as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

Consumer
The Company manages a consistent process for assessing consumer loan credit quality by monitoring its loan grading trends and past due statistics. All loans are subject to individual risk assessment. The Company’s categories include Pass, Special Mention, Substandard, and Doubtful, which are defined above. Delinquency statistics are also an important indicator of credit quality in the establishment of the allowance for loan losses.

The tables below provide a breakdown of outstanding consumer loans by risk category.

                             
      June 30, 2018
(dollars in thousands) Real estate Home equity Construction Other Total
Pass $      286,006 152,806      38,400      22,189      499,401
Special mention 1,558 510 - 197 2,265
Substandard 2,869 3,314 - 63 6,246
Doubtful - - - - -
$ 290,433      156,630 38,400 22,449 507,912
 
December 31, 2017
Real estate Home equity Construction Other Total
Pass $ 269,422 152,545 28,351 22,367 472,685
Special mention 715 1,025 - 88 1,828
Substandard 2,913 2,571 - 120 5,604
Doubtful - - - - -
$ 273,050 156,141 28,351 22,575 480,117

The following tables provide past due information for outstanding consumer loans and include loans on nonaccrual status as well as accruing TDRs.

                              
      June 30, 2018
(dollars in thousands) Real estate Home equity Construction Other Total
Current $      289,769      155,704      38,400      22,442      506,315
30-59 days past due 664 - - 2 666
60-89 days past due - 90 - 5 95
Greater than 90 Days - 836 - - 836
$ 290,433 156,630 38,400 22,449 507,912
 
December 31, 2017
Real estate Home equity Construction Other Total
Current $ 271,284 154,821 28,351 22,506 476,962
30-59 days past due 681 325 - 69 1,075
60-89 days past due 131 995 - - 1,126
Greater than 90 Days 954 - - - 954
$ 273,050 156,141 28,351 22,575 480,117

As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, consumer loans 30 days or more past due were 0.10% and 0.23% of total loans, respectively.

Nonperforming assets

The following table shows the nonperforming assets and the related percentage of nonperforming assets to total assets and gross loans. Generally, a loan is placed on nonaccrual status when it becomes 90 days past due as to principal or interest, or when the Company believes, after considering economic and business conditions and collection efforts, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of the contractual principal or interest on the loan is doubtful. A payment of interest on a loan that is classified as nonaccrual is recognized as a reduction in principal when received.

17


Following is a summary of our nonperforming assets, including nonaccruing TDRs.

         
(dollars in thousands)       June 30, 2018       December 31, 2017
Commercial
Owner occupied RE $ - -
Non-owner occupied RE 1,689 1,581
Construction - -
Business 94 910
Consumer
Real estate 1,174 992
Home equity 1,598 1,144
Construction - -
Other - 1
Nonaccruing troubled debt restructurings 3,166 2,673
Total nonaccrual loans, including nonaccruing TDRs 7,721 7,301
Other real estate owned 117 242
Total nonperforming assets $ 7,838 7,543
Nonperforming assets as a percentage of:
Total assets      0.44% 0.46%
Gross loans 0.51% 0.54%
Total loans over 90 days past due 1,122 2,027
Loans over 90 days past due and still accruing - -
Accruing troubled debt restructurings $ 7,397 5,145

Impaired Loans

The table below summarizes key information for impaired loans. The Company’s impaired loans include loans on nonaccrual status and loans modified in a TDR, whether on accrual or nonaccrual status. These impaired loans may have estimated impairment which is included in the allowance for loan losses. The Company’s commercial and consumer impaired loans are evaluated individually to determine the related allowance for loan losses.

           
      June 30, 2018
Recorded investment
Impaired loans
Unpaid with related Related
Principal Impaired allowance for allowance for
(dollars in thousands)       Balance       loans       loan losses       loan losses
Commercial
Owner occupied RE $ 2,858 2,793 454 74
Non-owner occupied RE 7,304 3,829 2,269 659
Construction - - - -
Business 4,076 3,348 2,994 1,397
Total commercial 14,238 9,970 5,717 2,130
Consumer
Real estate 2,946 2,867 2,203 1,226
Home equity 2,750 2,117 220 94
Construction - - - -
Other 164 164 164 20
Total consumer 5,860 5,148 2,587 1,340
Total $      20,098 15,118 8,304 3,470

18



           
      December 31, 2017
Recorded investment
Impaired loans
Unpaid with related Related
Principal Impaired allowance for allowance for
(dollars in thousands)            Balance       loans       loan losses       loan losses
Commercial
Owner occupied RE $ 2,281 2,235 464 179
Non-owner occupied RE 6,827 3,665 2,646 750
Construction - - - -
Business 3,735 2,764 1,993 1,061
Total commercial 12,843 8,664 5,103 1,990
Consumer
Real estate 2,062 2,037 2,037 1,379
Home equity 2,010 1,575 680 286
Construction - - - -
Other 171 170 170 22
Total consumer 4,243 3,782 2,887 1,687
Total $      17,086 12,446 7,990 3,677

The following table provides the average recorded investment in impaired loans and the amount of interest income recognized on impaired loans after impairment by portfolio segment and class.

         
Three months ended Three months ended
June 30, 2018 June 30, 2017
Average   Recognized Average   Recognized
recorded interest recorded interest
(dollars in thousands)             investment       income       investment       income
Commercial
Owner occupied RE $ 2,800 45 2,195 26
Non-owner occupied RE 3,878 77 3,620 48
Construction - - - -
Business 3,361 57 3,623 54
Total commercial 10,039 179 9,438 128
Consumer
Real estate 2,892 40 1,635 16
Home equity 2,135 24 197 1
Construction - - - -
Other 165 1 180 1
Total consumer 5,192 65 2,012 18
Total $      15,231 244 11,450 146

19



             
Six months ended Six months ended Year ended
June 30, 2018 June 30, 2017 December 31, 2017
Average   Recognized Average   Recognized Average   Recognized
recorded interest recorded interest recorded interest
(dollars in thousands)       investment       income       investment       income       investment       income
Commercial
Owner occupied RE $ 2,804 62 2,204 53 2,255 104
Non-owner occupied RE 3,920 126 3,721 76 4,144 199
Construction - - - - - -
Business 3,380 79 3,635 98 2,823 162
Total commercial 10,104 267 9,560 227 9,222 465
Consumer
Real estate 2,911 81 1,642 33 2,047 69
Home equity 2,172 51 198 2 1,576 97
Construction - - - - - -
Other 167 3 181 2 174 6
Total consumer 5,250 135 2,021 37 3,797 172
Total $      15,354 402 11,581 264 13,019 637

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan loss is management’s estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

The Company has an established process to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses that assesses the losses inherent in the portfolio. While the Company attributes portions of the allowance to specific portfolio segments, the entire allowance is available to absorb credit losses inherent in the total loan portfolio. The Company’s process involves procedures to appropriately consider the unique risk characteristics of the commercial and consumer loan portfolio segments. For each portfolio segment, impairment is measured individually for each impaired loan. The Company’s allowance levels are influenced by loan volume, loan grade or delinquency status, historic loss experience and other economic conditions.

The following table summarizes the activity related to the allowance for loan losses by commercial and consumer portfolio segments:

     
Three months ended June 30, 2018
Commercial Consumer
Owner Non-owner
occupied occupied Real Home
(dollars in thousands)      RE      RE      Construction      Business      Estate      equity      Construction      Other      Total
Balance, beginning of period $      2,680 3,366 415 3,553      3,391   1,911 256      280 15,852
Provision for loan losses 19 342 129 280 54 (438 ) 26 (12 ) 400
Loan charge-offs - (234 ) - - - (77 ) - - (311 )
Loan recoveries - 107 - 16 1 35 - - 159
Net loan charge-offs - (127 ) - 16 1 (42 ) - - (152 )
Balance, end of period $ 2,699         3,581 544 3,849 3,446 1,431 282 268 16,100
Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized) 0.04%
Allowance for loan losses to gross loans 1.05%
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans 208.52%

20



 
Three months ended June 30, 2017
Commercial Consumer
Owner   Non-owner
occupied   occupied Real   Home
(dollars in thousands)      RE      RE      Construction      Business      Estate      equity      Construction      Other      Total
Balance, beginning of period $ 3,052 2,967 334       3,823    2,830 1,619 289 373 15,287
Provision for loan losses (88 ) 255 16 139 240 (23 ) 39 (78 ) 500
Loan charge-offs - (253 ) - (120 ) - - - - (373 )
Loan recoveries - 12 - 15 (9 ) 12 - - 30
Net loan charge-offs - (241 ) - (105 ) (9 ) 12 - - (343 )
Balance, end of period $      2,964 2,981 350 3,857 3,061   1,608 328    295 15,444
Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized) 0.11 %
Allowance for loan losses to gross loans 1.19 %
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans 293.75 %
       
 
Six months ended June 30, 2018
Commercial Consumer
Owner   Non-owner
occupied   occupied Real Home
(dollars in thousands) RE RE   Construction   Business Estate   equity   Construction   Other Total
Balance, beginning of period $ 2,534              3,230 325 3,848 3,495 1,600 210 281 15,523
Provision for loan losses 165 478 219 (14 ) 25 (64 ) 72 19 900
Loan charge-offs - (234 ) - (119 ) (77 ) (140 ) - (34 ) (604 )
Loan recoveries - 107 - 134 3 35 - 2 281
Net loan charge-offs - (127 ) - 15 (74 ) (105 ) - (32 ) (323 )
Balance, end of period $ 2,699 3,581 544 3,849 3,446 1,431 282 268 16,100
Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized) 0.04 %
 
Six months ended June 30, 2017
Commercial Consumer
Owner   Non-owner
occupied   occupied Real   Home
RE RE   Construction   Business Estate   equity     Construction   Other Total
Balance, beginning of period $ 2,843 2,778 295 4,123 2,780 1,475 252 309 14,855
Provision for loan losses 121 623 55 (182 ) 200 121 76 (14 ) 1,000
Loan charge-offs - (433 ) - (130 ) - - - - (563 )
Loan recoveries - 13 - 46 81 12 - - 152
Net loan charge-offs - (420 ) - (84 ) 81 12 - - (411 )
Balance, end of period $ 2,964          2,981 350 3,857 3,061 1,608 328 295   15,444
Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized) 0.03 %

The following table disaggregates the allowance for loan losses and recorded investment in loans by impairment methodology.

                   
June 30, 2018
Allowance for loan losses Recorded investment in loans
(dollars in thousands)       Commercial       Consumer       Total       Commercial       Consumer       Total
Individually evaluated $      2,130 1,340 3,470 9,970 5,148 15,118
Collectively evaluated 8,543 4,087 12,630 1,015,565 502,764 1,518,329
Total $ 10,673 5,427 16,100 1,025,535 507,912 1,533,447
 
December 31, 2017
Allowance for loan losses Recorded investment in loans
Commercial Consumer Total Commercial Consumer Total
Individually evaluated $ 1,990 1,687 3,677 8,664 3,782 12,446
Collectively evaluated 7,947 3,899 11,846 898,289 476,335 1,374,624
Total $ 9,937 5,586 15,523 906,953 480,117 1,387,070

21


NOTE 5 – Troubled Debt Restructurings

At June 30, 2018, the Company had 28 loans totaling $10.6 million compared to 21 loans totaling $7.8 million at December 31, 2017, which were considered as TDRs. The Company considers a loan to be a TDR when the debtor experiences financial difficulties and the Company grants a concession to the debtor that it would not normally consider. Concessions can relate to the contractual interest rate, maturity date, or payment structure of the note. As part of the workout plan for individual loan relationships, the Company may restructure loan terms to assist borrowers facing financial challenges in the current economic environment. To date, the Company has restored four commercial loans previously classified as TDRs to accrual status.

The following table summarizes the concession at the time of modification and the recorded investment in the Company’s TDRs before and after their modification.

     
For the six months ended June 30, 2018
Pre- Post-
modification modification
Renewals Reduced Converted Maturity Total outstanding outstanding
deemed a or deferred to interest date Number recorded recorded
(dollars in thousands)       concession       payments       only       extensions of loans investment investment
Commercial                  
Owner occupied RE 1 - - - 1 $ 506 $ 592
Business 4 - - - 4 1,207 1,532
Consumer
Real estate 2 - - - 2 549 669
Home equity - 1 - - 1 180 180
Total loans 7 1 - - 8 $       2,442 $       2,973
 
For the six months ended June 30, 2017
Pre- Post-
modification modification
Renewals Reduced Converted Maturity Total outstanding outstanding
deemed a or deferred to interest date Number recorded recorded
concession payments only extensions of loans investment investment
Commercial
Business 1 1 - - 2 $ 378 $ 387
Total loans 1 1 - - 2 $ 378 $ 387

As of June 30, 2018 and 2017, there were no loans modified as TDRs for which there was a payment default (60 days past due) within 12 months of the restructuring date.

NOTE 6 – Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments primarily to hedge its exposure to changes in interest rates. All derivative financial instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities and measured at fair value. The Company accounts for all of its derivatives as free-standing derivatives and does not designate any of these instruments for hedge accounting. Therefore, the gain or loss resulting from the change in the fair value of the derivative is recognized in the Company’s statement of income during the period of change.

The Company enters into commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale, at specified interest rates and within a specified period of time, with clients who have applied for a loan and meet certain credit and underwriting criteria (interest rate lock commitments). These interest rate lock commitments (“IRLCs”) meet the definition of a derivative financial instrument and are reflected in the balance sheet at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in current period earnings. Unrealized gains and losses on the IRLCs are recorded as derivative assets and derivative liabilities, respectively, and are measured based on the value of the underlying mortgage loan, quoted mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) prices and an estimate of the probability that the mortgage loan will fund within the terms of the interest rate lock commitment, net of estimated commission expenses.

22


The Company manages the interest rate and price risk associated with its outstanding IRLCs and mortgage loans held for sale by entering into derivative instruments such as forward sales of MBS. Management expects these derivatives will experience changes in fair value opposite to changes in fair value of the IRLCs and mortgage loans held for sale, thereby reducing earnings volatility. The Company takes into account various factors and strategies in determining the portion of the mortgage pipeline (IRLCs and mortgage loans held for sale) it wants to economically hedge.

The following table summarizes the Company’s outstanding financial derivative instruments at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

     
June 30, 2018
Fair Value
(dollars in thousands)       Notional       Balance Sheet Location       Asset/(Liability)
Mortgage loan interest rate lock commitments $      25,463 Other assets $         320
MBS forward sales commitments 16,500 Other liabilities (60 )
Total derivative financial instruments $ 41,963 $ 260
 
December 31, 2017
Fair Value
Notional Balance Sheet Location Asset/(Liability)
Mortgage loan interest rate lock commitments $ 15,430 Other assets $ 196
MBS forward sales commitments 10,750 Other liabilities (28 )
Total derivative financial instruments $ 26,180 $ 168

NOTE 7 – Fair Value Accounting

FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures,” defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. FASB ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 – Quoted market price in active markets
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include certain debt and equity securities that are traded in an active exchange market.

Level 2 – Significant other observable inputs
Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include fixed income securities and mortgage-backed securities that are held in the Company’s available-for-sale portfolio and valued by a third-party pricing service, as well as certain impaired loans.

Level 3 – Significant unobservable inputs
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. These methodologies may result in a significant portion of the fair value being derived from unobservable data.

23


The methods of determining the fair value of assets and liabilities presented in this note are consistent with our methodologies disclosed in Note 13 of the Company’s 2017 Form 10-K, except for the valuation of loans held for investment which was impacted by the adoption of ASU 2016-01. Prior to adopting the amendments included in the standard, the Company was allowed to measure fair value under an entry price notion. The entry price notion previously applied by the Company used a discounted cash flows technique to calculate the present value of expected future cash flows for a financial instrument. The exit price notion uses the same approach, but also incorporates other factors, such as enhanced credit risk, illiquidity risk and market factors that sometimes exist in exit prices in dislocated markets. As of June 30, 2018, the technique used by the Company to estimate the exit price of the loan portfolio consists of similar procedures to those used as of December 31, 2017, but with added emphasis on both illiquidity risk and credit risk not captured by the previously applied entry price notion. This credit risk assumption is intended to approximate the fair value that a market participant would realize in a hypothetical orderly transaction. The Company’s loan portfolio is initially fair valued using a segmented approach, using the eight categories as disclosed in Note 4 – Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses. Loans are considered a Level 2 and Level 3 classification.

Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The tables below present the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

                         
June 30, 2018
(dollars in thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets
Securities available for sale
US government agencies $ - 8,714 - 8,714
SBA securities - 3,769 - 3,769
State and political subdivisions - 8,472 - 8,472
Asset-backed securities - 6,691 - 6,691
Mortgage-backed securities - 42,421 - 42,421
Mortgage loans held for sale - 8,075 - 8,075
Interest rate lock commitments - 320 - 320
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis $ - 78,462 - 78,462
 
Liabilities
MBS forward sales commitments $ - 60 - 60
Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis $ - 60 - 60
 
December 31, 2017
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets
Securities available for sale:
US government agencies $ - 8,653 - 8,653
SBA securities - 4,063 - 4,063
State and political subdivisions - 11,396 - 11,396
Mortgage-backed securities - 43,491 - 43,491
Mortgage loans held for sale - 11,790 - 11,790
Interest rate lock commitments - 196 - 196
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis $ - 79,589 - 79,589
 
Liabilities
MBS forward sales commitments $ - 28 - 28
Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis $ - 28 - 28

24


Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
The tables below present the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

 
     As of June 30, 2018
(dollars in thousands) Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total
Assets
Impaired loans $      - 2,920 8,728 11,648
Other real estate owned - 23 94 117
Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis $ - 2,943 8,822 11,765
 
As of December 31, 2017
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets
Impaired loans $ - 2,685 6,084 8,769
Other real estate owned - 148 94 242
Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis $ - 2,833 6,178 9,011

The Company had no liabilities carried at fair value or measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

Impaired Loans
The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan may be considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses may be established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures the impairment in accordance with FASB ASC 310, “Receivables.” The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. In accordance with FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures,” impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company considers the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 2. The Company’s current loan and appraisal policies require the Company to obtain updated appraisals on an “as is” basis at renewal, or in the case of an impaired loan, on an annual basis, either through a new external appraisal or an appraisal evaluation. The Company reviews the third party appraisal for appropriateness and adjusts the value downward to consider selling and closing costs, which typically range from 7% - 10% of the appraised value. For non-real estate loans, fair value of the of the impaired loan’s collateral may be determined using an appraisal, net book value per the borrower’s financial statements, or aging reports, adjusted or discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of the valuation, and management’s expertise and knowledge of the client and client’s business. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company considers the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3. The fair value of impaired loans may also be estimated using the present value of expected future cash flows to be realized on the loan, which is also considered a Level 3 valuation. These fair value estimates are subject to fluctuations in assumptions about the amount and timing of expected cash flows as well as the choice of discount rate used in the present value calculation.

Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”)
OREO, consisting of properties obtained through foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans, is reported at the lower of cost or fair value, determined on the basis of current appraisals, comparable sales, and other estimates of value obtained principally from independent sources, adjusted for estimated selling costs (Level 2). At the time of foreclosure, any excess of the loan balance over the fair value of the real estate held as collateral is treated as a charge against the allowance for loan losses. Gains or losses on sale and generally any subsequent adjustments to the value are recorded as a component of real estate owned activity. The unobservable inputs may vary depending on the individual assets and valuation approach. The Company reviews the third party appraisal for appropriateness and adjusts the value downward to consider selling and closing costs, which typically range from 7% to 10% of the appraised value. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company considers the OREO as nonrecurring Level 3.

25


Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Financial instruments require disclosure of fair value information, whether or not recognized in the consolidated balance sheets, when it is practical to estimate the fair value. A financial instrument is defined as cash, evidence of an ownership interest in an entity or a contractual obligation which requires the exchange of cash. Certain items are specifically excluded from the disclosure requirements, including the Company’s common stock, premises and equipment and other assets and liabilities.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are as follows:

     
     June 30, 2018
Carrying      Fair               
(dollars in thousands) Amount Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Financial Assets:
Other investments, at cost $ 3,059 3,059 - - 3,059
Loans1 1,502,229 1,483,215 - - 1,483,215
Financial Liabilities:
Deposits 1,567,982 1,430,788 - 1,430,788 -
FHLB and other borrowings 28,600 28,792 - 28,792 -
Junior subordinated debentures 13,403 14,148 - 14,148 -
 
December 31, 2017
Carrying Fair
Amount Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Financial Assets:
Other investments, at cost $     4,462 4,462 - - 4,462
Loans1 1,359,101 1,363,915 - - 1,363,915
Financial Liabilities:
Deposits 1,381,123 1,269,462 - 1,269,462 -
FHLB and other borrowings 67,200 67,890 - 67,890 -
Junior subordinated debentures 13,403 13,166 - 13,166 -

1

Carrying amount is net of the allowance for loan losses and previously presented impaired loans. In accordance with the prospective adoption of ASU No. 2016-01, the fair value of loans as of June 30, 2018 was measured using an exit price notion. The fair value of loans as of December 31, 2017 was measured using an entry price notion.

NOTE 8 – Earnings Per Common Share

The following schedule reconciles the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. Dilutive common shares arise from the potentially dilutive effect of the Company’s stock options that were outstanding at June 30, 2018. The assumed conversion of stock options can create a difference between basic and dilutive net income per common share. At June 30, 2018 and 2017, there were 166,172 and 120,681 options, respectively, that were not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share because they were anti-dilutive.

26



         
     Three months ended      Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
(dollars in thousands, except share data) 2018      2017 2018      2017
Numerator:
Net income available to common shareholders $ 5,510 3,604 10,724 6,716
Denominator:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding – basic 7,370,709 6,986,948 7,353,867 6,713,608
Common stock equivalents 380,437 379,260 385,215 385,773
Weighted-average common shares outstanding – diluted 7,751,146 7,366,208 7,739,082 7,099,381
Earnings per common share:
Basic $      0.75 0.52 1.46 1.00
Diluted $ 0.71 0.49 1.39 0.95

NOTE 9 – Reportable Segments

The Company’s reportable segments represent the distinct product lines the Company offers and are viewed separately for strategic planning purposes by management. The three segments include Commercial and Retail Banking, Mortgage Banking, and Corporate. The following schedule presents financial information for each reportable segment.

(dollars in thousands)        
  Three months ended   Three months ended
June 30, 2018 June 30, 2017
Commercial       Commercial        
and Retail Mortgage and Retail Mortgage
Banking Banking Corporate   Eliminations Consolidated Banking Banking Corporate Elimination Consolidated
Interest income $ 18,437 98 2 (2 ) 18,535 $ 14,851 80 6 (6 ) 14,931
Interest expense 3,762 - 163 (2 ) 3,923 2,442 - 143 (6 ) 2,579
Net interest income (loss) 14,675 98 (161 ) - 14,612 12,409 80 (137 ) - 12,352
Provision for loan losses 400 - - - 400 500 - - - 500
Noninterest income 1,142 1,629 - - 2,771 959 1,603 - - 2,562
Noninterest expense 8,754 1,165 60 - 9,979 7,667 1,035 60 - 8,762
Net income (loss) before taxes 6,663 562 (221 ) - 7,004 5,201 648 (197 ) - 5,652
Income tax provision (benefit) 1,422 118 (46 ) - 1,494 1,877 240 (69 ) - 2,048
Net income (loss) $ 5,241 444 (175 ) - 5,510 $ 3,324 408 (128 ) - 3,604
Total assets $ 1,777,952 9,404 174,331     (173,903 )   1,787,784 $ 1,527,837 10,958 156,145 (155,714 )   1,539,226
 
(dollars in thousands) Six months ended Six months ended
June 30, 2018 June 30, 2017
Commercial Commercial
and Retail Mortgage and Retail Mortgage
Banking Banking Corporate Eliminations Consolidated Banking Banking Corporate Eliminations Consolidated
Interest income $ 35,515 198 4 (4 ) 35,713 $ 28,744 146 8 (8 ) 28,890
Interest expense 6,782 - 282 (4 ) 7,060 4,665 - 274 (8 ) 4,931
Net interest income (loss) 28,733 198 (278 ) - 28,653 24,079 146 (266 ) - 23,959
Provision for loan losses 900 - - - 900 1,000 - - - 1,000
Noninterest income 2,235 2,957 - - 5,192 1,954 2,660 - - 4,614
Noninterest expense 16,935 2,129 120 - 19,184 15,114 1,883 126 - 17,123
Net income before taxes 13,133 1,026 (398 ) - 13,761 9,919 923 (392 ) - 10,450
Income tax provision (benefit) 2,906 215 (84 ) - 3,037 3,530 342 (138 ) - 3,734
Net income (loss) $ 10,227 811 (314 ) - 10,724 $ 6,389 581 (254 ) - 6,716
Total assets $ 1,777,952 9,404 174,331     (173,903 )   1,787,784 $ 1,527,837 10,958 156,145 (155,714 )   1,539,226

Commercial and retail banking. The Company’s primary business is to provide traditional deposit and lending products and services to its commercial and retail banking clients.
Mortgage banking. The mortgage banking segment provides mortgage loan origination services for loans that will be sold in the secondary market to investors.
Corporate. Corporate is comprised primarily of compensation and benefits for certain members of management and interest on parent company debt.

27


Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion reviews our results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 and assesses our financial condition as of June 30, 2018 as compared to December 31, 2017. You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the related notes and the consolidated financial statements and the related notes for the year ended December 31, 2017 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for that period. Results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the year ending December 31, 2018 or any future period.

CAUTIONARY WARNING REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report, including information included or incorporated by reference in this report, contains statements which constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements may relate to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, or future performance. These statements are based on many assumptions and estimates and are not guarantees of future performance. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, as they will depend on many factors about which we are unsure, including many factors which are beyond our control. The words “may,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “predict,” “project,” “potential,” “believe,” “continue,” “assume,” “intend,” “plan,” and “estimate,” as well as similar expressions, are meant to identify such forward-looking statements. Potential risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:

Restrictions or conditions imposed by our regulators on our operations;

   

Increases in competitive pressure in the banking and financial services industries;

   

Changes in access to funding or increased regulatory requirements with regard to funding;

   

Changes in deposit flows;

   

Credit losses as a result of declining real estate values, increasing interest rates, increasing unemployment, changes in payment behavior or other factors;

   

Credit losses due to loan concentration;

   

Changes in the amount of our loan portfolio collateralized by real estate and weaknesses in the real estate market;

   

Our ability to successfully execute our business strategy;

   

Our ability to attract and retain key personnel;

   

The success and costs of our expansion into the Greensboro, North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina and Atlanta, Georgia markets;

   

Changes in the interest rate environment which could reduce anticipated or actual margins;

   

Changes in political conditions or the legislative or regulatory environment, including governmental initiatives affecting the financial services industry;

   

Changes in economic conditions resulting in, among other things, a deterioration in credit quality;

   

Changes occurring in business conditions and inflation;

   

Increased cybersecurity risk, including potential business disruptions or financial losses;

   

Changes in technology;

   

The adequacy of the level of our allowance for loan losses and the amount of loan loss provisions required in future periods;

   

Examinations by our regulatory authorities, including the possibility that the regulatory authorities may, among other things, require us to increase our allowance for loan losses or write-down assets;

28



Changes in monetary and tax policies;

   

The rate of delinquencies and amounts of loans charged-off;

   

The rate of loan growth in recent years and the lack of seasoning of a portion of our loan portfolio;

   

Our ability to maintain appropriate levels of capital and to comply with our capital ratio requirements;

   

Adverse changes in asset quality and resulting credit risk-related losses and expenses;

   

Changes in accounting policies and practices; and

   

Other risks and uncertainties detailed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and from time to time in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

If any of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if any of the assumptions underlying such forward-looking statements proves to be incorrect, our results could differ materially from those expressed in, implied or projected by, such forward-looking statements. For information with respect to additional factors that could cause actual results to differ from the expectations stated in the forward-looking statements, see “Risk Factors” under Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 and “Risk Factors” under Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We urge investors to consider all of these factors carefully in evaluating the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We make these forward-looking statements as of the date of this document and we do not intend, and assume no obligation, to update the forward-looking statements or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those expressed in, or implied or projected by, the forward-looking statements.

OVERVIEW

Our business model continues to be client-focused, utilizing relationship teams to provide our clients with a specific banker contact and support team responsible for all of their banking needs. The purpose of this structure is to provide a consistent and superior level of professional service, and we believe it provides us with a distinct competitive advantage. We consider exceptional client service to be a critical part of our culture, which we refer to as "ClientFIRST."

At June 30, 2018, we had total assets of $1.8 billion, a 10.0% increase from total assets of $1.6 billion at December 31, 2017. The largest components of our total assets are loans, cash and cash equivalents and securities which were $1.5 billion, $109.4 million and $73.1 million, respectively, at June 30, 2018. Comparatively, our loans, cash and cash equivalents and securities totaled $1.4 billion, $92.2 million and $72.1 million, respectively, at December 31, 2017. Our liabilities and shareholders’ equity at June 30, 2018 totaled $1.6 billion and $160.9 million, respectively, compared to liabilities of $1.5 billion and shareholders’ equity of $149.7 million at December 31, 2017. The principal component of our liabilities is deposits which were $1.6 billion and $1.4 billion at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

Like most community banks, we derive the majority of our income from interest received on our loans and investments. Our primary source of funds for making these loans and investments is our deposits, on which we pay interest. Consequently, one of the key measures of our success is our amount of net interest income, or the difference between the income on our interest-earning assets, such as loans and investments, and the expense on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. Another key measure is the spread between the yield we earn on these interest-earning assets and the rate we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities, which is called our net interest spread. In addition to earning interest on our loans and investments, we earn income through fees and other charges to our clients.

Our net income to common shareholders was $5.5 million and $3.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, an increase of $1.9 million, or 52.9%. Diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) was $0.71 for the second quarter of 2018 as compared to $0.49 for the same period in 2017. The increase in net income resulted primarily from increases in net interest income and noninterest income partially offset due to an increase in noninterest expense. In addition, as a result of the Tax Act which was passed in December 2017, our effective rate declined from 36.2% for the second quarter of 2017 to 21.3% for the second quarter of 2018, which also contributed to the increase in net income during the second quarter of 2018.

29


Our net income to common shareholders was $10.7 million and $6.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, an increase of $4.0 million, or 59.7%. Diluted EPS was $1.39 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to $0.95 for the same period in 2017. The increase in net income resulted primarily from an increase in net interest income and noninterest income as well as a lower tax rate, and partially offset by an increase in noninterest expense.

Economic conditions, competition, and the monetary and fiscal policies of the Federal government significantly affect most financial institutions, including the Bank. Lending and deposit activities and fee income generation are influenced by levels of business spending and investment, consumer income, consumer spending and savings, capital market activities, and competition among financial institutions, as well as customer preferences, interest rate conditions and prevailing market rates on competing products in our market areas.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net Interest Income and Margin
Our level of net interest income is determined by the level of earning assets and the management of our net interest margin. Our net interest income was $14.6 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2018, an 18.3% increase over net interest income of $12.4 million for the same period in 2017. In comparison, our average earning assets increased 17.7%, or $252.9 million, during the second quarter of 2018 compared to the second quarter of 2017, while our average interest-bearing liabilities increased by $186.8 million during the same period. Our net interest income was $28.7 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2018, a 19.6% increase over net interest income of $24.0 million for the same period in 2017. In comparison, our average earning assets increased 18.7%, or $256.0 million, during the first six months of 2018 compared to the first six months of 2017, while our average interest-bearing liabilities increased by $184.5 million during the same period. The increase in average earning assets in both the three and six month periods ended June 30, 208 is primarily related to an increase in average loans and federal funds sold, while the increase in average interest-bearing liabilities is primarily a result of an increase in interest-bearing deposits, partially offset by a decrease in our FHLB advances and other borrowings.

We have included a number of tables to assist in our description of various measures of our financial performance. For example, the “Average Balances, Income and Expenses, Yields and Rates” table reflects the average balance of each category of our assets and liabilities as well as the yield we earned or the rate we paid with respect to each category during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. A review of this table shows that our loans typically provide higher interest yields than do other types of interest-earning assets, which is why we direct a substantial percentage of our earning assets into our loan portfolio. Similarly, the “Rate/Volume Analysis” table demonstrates the effect of changing interest rates and changing volume of assets and liabilities on our financial condition during the periods shown. We also track the sensitivity of our various categories of assets and liabilities to changes in interest rates, and we have included tables to illustrate our interest rate sensitivity with respect to interest-earning accounts and interest-bearing accounts.

The following tables set forth information related to our average balance sheets, average yields on assets, and average costs of liabilities. We derived these yields by dividing income or expense by the average balance of the corresponding assets or liabilities. We derived average balances from the daily balances throughout the periods indicated. During the same periods, we had no securities purchased with agreements to resell. All investments owned have an original maturity of over one year. Nonaccrual loans are included in the following tables. Loan yields have been reduced to reflect the negative impact on our earnings of loans on nonaccrual status. The net of capitalized loan costs and fees are amortized into interest income on loans.

30



Average Balances, Income and Expenses, Yields and Rates
   
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
2018 2017
Average Income/ Yield/ Average Income/ Yield/
(dollars in thousands)     Balance     Expense     Rate(1)     Balance     Expense     Rate(1)
Interest-earning assets
Federal funds sold $ 113,238 $ 514 1.82% $ 95,214 $ 261 1.10%
Investment securities, taxable 62,780 390 2.49% 53,296 269 2.02%
Investment securities, nontaxable(2) 5,661 52 3.68% 19,879 195 3.94%
Loans(3) 1,499,625 17,591 4.70% 1,260,007 14,280 4.55%
Total interest-earning assets 1,681,304 18,547 4.42% 1,428,396 15,005 4.21%
Noninterest-earning assets 75,851 66,916
Total assets $ 1,757,155 $ 1,495,312
 
Interest-bearing liabilities
NOW accounts $ 235,235 102 0.17% $ 225,577 106 0.19%
Savings & money market 671,065 2,099 1.25% 446,890 821 0.74%
Time deposits 329,325 1,323 1.61% 329,497 812 0.99%
Total interest-bearing deposits 1,235,625 3,524 1.14% 1,001,964 1,739 0.70%
FHLB advances and other borrowings 28,600 239 3.35% 75,469 729 3.87%
Junior subordinated debentures 13,403 160 4.79% 13,403 111 3.32%
Total interest-bearing liabilities 1,277,628 3,923 1.23% 1,090,836 2,579 0.95%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities 321,952 272,096
Shareholders’ equity 157,575 132,380
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $    1,757,155 $    1,495,312
Net interest spread 3.19% 3.26%
Net interest income (tax equivalent) / margin $ 14,624 3.49% $ 12,426 3.49%
Less: tax-equivalent adjustment(2) 12 74
Net interest income $    14,612 $    12,352
(1) Annualized for the three month period.
(2) The tax-equivalent adjustment to net interest income adjusts the yield for assets earning tax-exempt income to a comparable yield on a taxable basis.
(3) Includes mortgage loans held for sale.

Our net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, was 3.49% for both the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. While our net interest margin remained consistent from the prior year, our average interest-earning assets grew by $252.9 million during the second quarter of 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, with the average yield on these assets increasing by 21 basis points. In addition, our average interest-bearing liabilities grew by $186.8 million during the 2018 period while the rate on these liabilities increased 28 basis points to 1.23% for the three months ended June 30, 2018.

The $252.9 million increase in average interest-earning assets for the three months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to the same quarter in 2017, primarily related to a $239.6 million increase in our average loan balances. In addition, the yield on our average loans increased 15 basis points during the second quarter of 2018 as compared to the same period of 2017, contributing to the 21 basis point increase in our average interest earning assets during the second quarter of 2018. The higher yield on our loan portfolio was due to loans being originated or renewed at market rates which are higher than those in the past.

In addition, our average interest-bearing liabilities increased by $186.8 million during the second quarter of 2018 as compared to the second quarter of 2017, while the cost of our interest-bearing liabilities increased by 28 basis points during the same period. The increased cost during the 2018 period resulted primarily from a $233.7 million increase in our interest-bearing deposits at an average rate of 1.14%, a 44 basis point increase from the average rate in the second quarter of 2017. This increase was partially offset by a $46.9 million decrease in FHLB advances and other borrowings at an average rate of 3.35%, a 52 basis point decrease from the second quarter of 2017.

31


Our net interest spread was 3.19% for the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to 3.26% for the same period in 2017. The net interest spread is the difference between the yield we earn on our interest-earning assets and the rate we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities. The seven basis point decrease in our net interest spread was driven by the 28 basis point increase in the cost of our interest-bearing liabilities, partially offset by the 21 basis point increase in yield on our interest-earning assets for the 2018 period. We anticipate continued pressure on our net interest spread and net interest margin in future periods based on the possibility of additional Federal Reserve interest rate increases and a competitive rate environment.

     
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
2018 2017
Average Income/ Yield/ Average Income/ Yield/
(dollars in thousands)     Balance     Expense     Rate(1)     Balance     Expense     Rate(1)
Interest-earning assets
Federal funds sold $ 87,632 $ 761 1.75% $ 62,545 $ 318 1.03%
Investment securities, taxable 60,413 711 2.37% 51,740 523 2.04%
Investment securities, nontaxable (2) 6,354 113 3.59% 19,748 392 4.00%
Loans(3) 1,472,137 34,154 4.68% 1,236,544 27,806 4.53%
Total interest-earning assets 1,626,536 35,739 4.43% 1,370,577 29,039 4.27%
Noninterest-earning assets 75,272 66,086
Total assets $ 1,701,808 $ 1,436,663
Interest-bearing liabilities
NOW accounts $ 237,020 193 0.16% $ 222,677 205 0.19%
Savings & money market 633,361 3,677 1.17% 417,217 1,373 0.66%
Time deposits 322,374 2,393 1.50% 301,012 1,411 0.95%
Total interest-bearing deposits 1,192,755 6,263 1.06% 940,906 2,989 0.64%
FHLB advances and other borrowings 31,925 521 3.29% 99,274 1,727 3.51%
Junior subordinated debentures 13,403 276 4.15% 13,403 215 3.23%
Total interest-bearing liabilities 1,238,083 7,060 1.15% 1,053,583 4,931 0.94%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities 308,737 260,851
Shareholders’ equity 154,988 122,229
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $    1,701,808 $    1,436,663
Net interest spread 3.28% 3.33%
Net interest income (tax equivalent) / margin $ 28,679 3.56% $ 24,108 3.55%
Less: tax-equivalent adjustment (2) 26 149
Net interest income $     28,653 $     23,959
(1) Annualized for the six month period.
(2) The tax-equivalent adjustment to net interest income adjusts the yield for assets earning tax-exempt income to a comparable yield on a taxable basis.
(3) Includes mortgage loans held for sale.

Our net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, was 3.56% for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to 3.55% for the first six months of 2017. While our net interest margin increased only one basis point as compared to the same period in 2017, our average interest-earning assets grew by $256.0 million during the same period, with the average yield on these assets increasing by 16 basis points. In addition, our average interest-bearing liabilities grew by $184.5 million during the 2018 period while the rate on these liabilities increased 21 basis points for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Our average interest-earning assets increased by $256.0 million as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017 related primarily to a $235.6 million increase in our average loan balances for the 2018 period. The 16 basis point increase in yield on our interest-earning assets was driven by a 15 basis point increase in our loan yield due primarily to loans being originated or renewed at market rates which are higher than those in the past.

In addition, our average interest-bearing liabilities increased by $184.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the first six months of 2017, while the cost of our interest-bearing liabilities increased 21 basis points during the same period. The increased cost during the first six months of 2018 was driven by a $251.8 million increase in our average interest-bearing deposits at an average rate of 1.06%, a 42 basis point increase from the average rate for the first six months of 2017, partially offset by a $67.3 million decrease in FHLB advances and other borrowings at an average rate of 3.29%, or 22 basis points lower than the first six months of 2017.

32


Our net interest spread was 3.28% for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to 3.33% for the same period in 2017. The five basis point decrease in our net interest spread for the 2018 period was driven by the 21 basis point increase in cost on our interest-bearing liabilities, partially offset by the 16 basis point increase in yield on our interest-earning assets. We anticipate continued pressure on our net interest spread and net interest margin in future periods based on the possibility of additional Federal Reserve interest rate increases and a competitive rate environment.

Rate/Volume Analysis
Net interest income can be analyzed in terms of the impact of changing interest rates and changing volume. The following table sets forth the effect which the varying levels of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the applicable rates have had on changes in net interest income for the periods presented.

 
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018 vs. 2017 June 30, 2017 vs. 2016
Increase (Decrease) Due to Increase (Decrease) Due to
Rate/ Rate/
(dollars in thousands)       Volume       Rate       Volume       Total       Volume       Rate       Volume       Total
Interest income
Loans $ 2,716 500 95 3,311 $ 2,326 (38 ) (7 ) 2,281
Investment securities (25 ) 70 (5 ) 40 (72 ) 5 (1 ) (68 )
Federal funds sold 49 171 33 253 89 43 83 215
Total interest income 2,740 741 123 3,604 2,343 10 75 2,428
Interest expense
Deposits 384 1,147 254 1,785 250 430 113 793
FHLB advances and other borrowings (453 ) (98 ) 61 (490 ) (325 ) 156 (54 ) (223 )
Junior subordinated debt - 49 - 49 - 19 - 19
Total interest expense (69 ) 1,098 315 1,344 (75 ) 605 59 589
Net interest income $       2,809       (357 )        (192 )        2,260 $       2,418        (595 )          16       1,839

Net interest income, the largest component of our income, was $14.6 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2018 and $12.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, a $2.3 million, or 18.3%, increase during the second quarter of 2018. The increase in net interest income is due to a $3.6 million increase in interest income, partially offset by a $1.3 million increase in interest expense. During the second quarter of 2018, the primary driver of the increase in net interest income was the $239.6 million increase in our average loan balances as compared to the second quarter of 2017.

  
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2018 vs. 2017 June 30, 2017 vs. 2016
Increase (Decrease) Due to Increase (Decrease) Due to
Rate/ Rate/
(dollars in thousands)       Volume       Rate       Volume       Total       Volume       Rate       Volume       Total
Interest income
Loans $ 5,298 882 168 6,348 $ 4,431 (354 ) (65 ) 4,012
Investment securities (51 ) 89 (6 ) 32 (169 ) (15 ) 3 (181 )
Federal funds sold 128 225 90 443 97 63 67 227
Total interest income 5,375 1,196 252 6,823 4,359 (306 ) 5 4,058
Interest expense
Deposits 742 2,027 505 3,274 404 539 112 1,055
FHLB advances and other borrowings (1,171 ) (107 ) 72 (1,206 ) (261 ) 111 (16 ) (166 )
Junior subordinated debt - 61 - 61 - 30 - 30
Total interest expense (429 ) 1,981 577 2,129 143 680 96 919
Net interest income $       5,804        (785 )       (325 )       4,694 $       4,216       (986 )       (91 )       3,139

Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was $28.7 million compared to $24.0 million for the first six months ended June 30, 2017, a $4.7 million, or 19.6% increase during the first six months of 2018 compared to the same period in 2017. The increase in net interest income is due to a $6.8 million increase in interest income, offset in part by a $2.1 million increase in interest expense. The $235.6 million increase in average loan balances during the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017 was the primary driver of the increase in net interest income during the 2018 period.

33


Provision for Loan Losses
We have established an allowance for loan losses through a provision for loan losses charged as an expense on our consolidated statements of income. We review our loan portfolio periodically to evaluate our outstanding loans and to measure both the performance of the portfolio and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Please see the discussion below under “Balance Sheet Review – Allowance for Loan Losses” for a description of the factors we consider in determining the amount of the provision we expense each period to maintain this allowance.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we incurred a noncash expense related to the provision for loan losses of $400,000 and $900,000, respectively, which resulted in an allowance for loan losses of $16.1 million, or 1.05% of gross loans, at June 30, 2018. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, our provision for loan losses of $500,000 and $1.0 million, respectively, resulted in an allowance for loan losses of $15.4 million, or 1.19% of gross loans, at June 30, 2017. Factors such as past due loans, as well as nonperforming and classified loan balances are also considered in determining the amount of loan loss provision necessary to maintain our allowance for loan losses at an adequate level.

Noninterest Income
The following table sets forth information related to our noninterest income.

 
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
(dollars in thousands)       2018       2017       2018       2017
Mortgage banking income $ 1,629 1,603 2,957 2,660
Service fees on deposit accounts 256 284 512 561
ATM and debit card income 371 290 705 552
Income from bank owned life insurance 220 183 441 366
Other income 295 202 577 475
Total noninterest income $      2,771      2,562      5,192      4,614

Noninterest income increased $209,000, or 8.2%, for the second quarter of 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. The increase in total noninterest income for the second quarter of 2018, as compared to the second quarter of 2017, resulted primarily from the following:

ATM and debit card income increased $81,000, or 27.9%, during the second quarter of 2018 primarily due to an increase in transaction volume.
   

Other income increased $93,000, or 46.0%, primarily due to a $50,000 loss recognized in the 2017 period related to our move from a leased space to our new building in Charleston, South Carolina. No gain or loss was recognized in the second quarter of 2018.

Partially offsetting these increases in noninterest income in the second quarter of 2018 was a $28,000 decrease in service fees on deposit accounts, driven by lower volume of non-sufficient funds (“NSF”) fee income.

Noninterest income increased $578,000, or 12.5%, during the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. The increase in total noninterest income during the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017 resulted primarily from the following:

Mortgage banking income increased $297,000, or 11.1%, driven by higher origination volume during the six months ended June 30, 2018.
  

ATM and debit card income increased $153,000, or 27.7%, during the six months ended June 30, 2018 primarily due to an increase in transaction volume.
  

Other income increased $102,000, or 21.5%, primarily due to a $50,000 loss recognized in the 2017 period related to our move from a leased space to our new building in Charleston, South Carolina.

Partially offsetting these increases in noninterest income during the six months ended June 30, 2018, was a $49,000 decrease in service fees on deposit accounts driven by lower volume of NSF fee income.

34


Noninterest expenses
The following table sets forth information related to our noninterest expenses.

 
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
(dollars in thousands)       2018       2017       2018       2017
Compensation and benefits $ 6,365 5,524 12,208 10,798
Occupancy 1,276 1,033 2,413 1,999
Outside service and data processing costs 824 823 1,560 1,568
Insurance 297 297 610 587
Professional fees 457 382 933 695
Marketing 229 196 438 407
Other 531 507 1,022 1,069
Total noninterest expense $      9,979      8,762      19,184      17,123

Noninterest expense was $10.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018, a $1.2 million, or 13.9%, increase from noninterest expense of $8.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017. The increase in total noninterest expense for the second quarter of 2018, as compared to the second quarter of 2017, resulted primarily from the following:

Compensation and benefits expense increased $841,000, or 15.2%, relating primarily to increases in base compensation, incentive compensation and benefits expense. Base compensation increased by $622,000 driven by the addition of 19 new employees, four of which were hired in conjunction with the opening of our new offices in the Triad region of North Carolina and Summerville, South Carolina; nine of which were hired in client services roles; and the remainder of which were hired to support loan and deposit growth as well as mortgage operations. Incentive compensation increased by $28,000 and benefits expense increased by $241,000 in the second quarter of 2018. The increase in incentive compensation and benefits expense related to the additional number of employees at June 30, 2018 compared to the 2017 period.
   

Occupancy expense increased by $243,000, or 23.5%, driven primarily by a $161,000 increase in rent expense combined with additional depreciation, maintenance and property expenses on the properties we own.
  

Professional fees increased by $75,000, or 19.6%, due primarily to increased legal fees and loan appraisal fees on our commercial and consumer loans.

Noninterest expense was $19.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, a $2.1 million, or 12.0%, increase from noninterest expense of $17.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The increase in total noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017, resulted primarily from the following:

Compensation and benefits expense increased $1.4 million, or 13.1%, relating primarily to the addition of 19 new employees. Compensation and benefits expense includes base and incentive compensation and benefits expense.
  

Occupancy expense increased by $414,000, or 20.1%, driven primarily by a $180,000 increase in rent expense combined with additional depreciation, maintenance and property expenses on the properties we own.
   

Professional fees increased by $238,000, or 34.2%, due primarily to increased legal fees and loan appraisal fees on our commercial and consumer loans.

Our efficiency ratio was 57.4% for the second quarter of 2018 as compared to 58.8% for the same period in 2017. The efficiency ratio represents the percentage of one dollar of expense required to be incurred to earn a full dollar of revenue and is computed by dividing noninterest expense by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income. The improvement during the 2018 period relates primarily to the increase in interest income and noninterest income, partially offset by the increase in noninterest expense compared to the prior year.

35


We incurred income tax expense of $1.5 million and $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $3.0 million and $3.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Our effective tax rate was 22.1% and 35.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate during the 2018 periods is a result of The Tax Act which was passed in December 2017 and became effective January 1, 2018.

BALANCE SHEET REVIEW

Investment Securities
At June 30, 2018, the $73.1 million in our investment securities portfolio represented approximately 4.1% of our total assets. Our available for sale investment portfolio included US government agency securities, SBA securities, state and political subdivisions, asset-backed securities and mortgage-backed securities with a fair value of $70.1 million and an amortized cost of $71.8 million resulting in an unrealized loss of $1.7 million. At December 31, 2017, the $72.1 million in our investment securities portfolio represented approximately 4.4% of our total assets. At December 31, 2017, we held investment securities available for sale with a fair value of $67.6 million and an amortized cost of $68.2 million for an unrealized loss of $578,000.

Loans
Since loans typically provide higher interest yields than other types of interest earning assets, a substantial percentage of our earning assets are invested in our loan portfolio. Average loans for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were $1.5 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively. Before the allowance for loan losses, total loans outstanding at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were $1.5 billion and $1.4 billion, respectively.

The principal component of our loan portfolio is loans secured by real estate mortgages. As of June 30, 2018, our loan portfolio included $1.3 billion, or 83.0%, of real estate loans. As of December 31, 2017, real estate loans made up 82.1% of our loan portfolio and totaled $1.1 billion. Most of our real estate loans are secured by residential or commercial property. We obtain a security interest in real estate, in addition to any other available collateral. This collateral is taken to increase the likelihood of the ultimate repayment of the loan. Generally, we limit the loan-to-value ratio on loans to coincide with the appropriate regulatory guidelines. We attempt to maintain a relatively diversified loan portfolio to help reduce the risk inherent in concentration in certain types of collateral and business types. We do not generally originate traditional long term residential mortgages to hold in our loan portfolio, but we do issue traditional second mortgage residential real estate loans and home equity lines of credit. Home equity lines of credit totaled $156.6 million as of June 30, 2018, of which approximately 42% were in a first lien position, while the remaining balance was second liens, compared to $156.1 million as of December 31, 2017, with approximately 40% in first lien positions and the remaining balance in second liens. The average loan had a balance of approximately $87,000 and a loan to value of 70% as of June 30, 2018, compared to an average loan balance of $89,000 and a loan to value of approximately 71% as of December 31, 2017. Further, 0.6% and 0.8% of our total home equity lines of credit were over 30 days past due as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

Following is a summary of our loan composition at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. During the first six months of 2018, our loan portfolio increased by $146.4 million, or 10.6%. Our commercial and consumer loan portfolios each experienced growth during the six months ended June 30, 2018 with a 13.1% increase in commercial loans and a 5.8% increase in consumer loans during the period. Of the $146.4 million in loan growth during the first six months of 2018, $134.3 million of the increase was in loans secured by real estate, $12.2 million in commercial business loans, while other consumer loan balances decreased by $126,000. Our consumer real estate portfolio includes high quality 1-4 family consumer real estate loans. Our average consumer real estate loan currently has a principal balance of $381,000, a term of ten years, and an average rate of 4.36% as of June 30, 2018, compared to $375,000 a term of ten years, and an average rate of 4.30% as of December 31, 2017.

36



         
      June 30, 2018       December 31, 2017
(dollars in thousands) Amount       % of Total Amount       % of Total
Commercial
Owner occupied RE $      358,169 23.4% $      316,818      22.8%
Non-owner occupied RE 355,309 23.2% 312,798 22.6%
Construction 73,655 4.8% 51,179 3.7%
Business 238,402 15.5% 226,158 16.3%
Total commercial loans 1,025,535 66.9% 906,953 65.4%
                         
Consumer
Real estate 290,433 18.9% 273,050 19.7%
Home equity 156,630 10.2% 156,141 11.3%
Construction 38,400 2.5% 28,351 2.0%
Other 22,449 1.5% 22,575 1.6%
Total consumer loans 507,912 33.1% 480,117 34.6%
Total gross loans, net of deferred fees 1,533,447      100.0% 1,387,070 100.0%
Less—allowance for loan losses (16,100 )   (15,523 )
Total loans, net $ 1,517,347 $ 1,371,547

Nonperforming assets
Nonperforming assets include real estate acquired through foreclosure or deed taken in lieu of foreclosure and loans on nonaccrual status. Generally, a loan is placed on nonaccrual status when it becomes 90 days past due as to principal or interest, or when we believe, after considering economic and business conditions and collection efforts, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of the contractual principal or interest on the loan is doubtful. A payment of interest on a loan that is classified as nonaccrual is recognized as a reduction in principal when received. Our policy with respect to nonperforming loans requires the borrower to make a minimum of six consecutive payments in accordance with the loan terms and to show capacity to continue performing into the future before that loan can be placed back on accrual status. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we had no loans 90 days past due and still accruing.

Following is a summary of our nonperforming assets, including nonaccruing TDRs.

         
(dollars in thousands)          June 30, 2018       December 31, 2017
Commercial $      1,783 2,491
Consumer 2,772 2,137
Nonaccruing troubled debt restructurings 3,166 2,673
Total nonaccrual loans 7,721 7,301
Other real estate owned 117 242
Total nonperforming assets $ 7,838 7,543

At June 30, 2018, nonperforming assets were $7.8 million, or 0.44% of total assets and 0.51% of gross loans. Comparatively, nonperforming assets were $7.5 million, or 0.46% of total assets and 0.54% of gross loans at December 31, 2017. Nonaccrual loans were $7.7 million at June 30, 2018, a $420,000 increase from December 31, 2017. During the first six months of 2018, nine loans were put on nonaccrual status while eight nonaccrual loans were either paid or charged-off and five loans were returned to accrual status. The amount of foregone interest income on the nonaccrual loans in the first six months of 2018 and 2017 was approximately $126,000 and $181,000, respectively.

Nonperforming assets include other real estate owned which comprised of two commercial properties totaling $117,000 at June 30, 2018, a $125,000 decrease from December 31, 2017. Both of these properties are located in the Upstate of South Carolina. We believe that these properties are appropriately valued at the lower of cost or market as of June 30, 2018.

37


At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the allowance for loan losses represented 208.5% and 212.6% of the total amount of nonperforming loans, respectively. A significant portion, or 84%, of nonperforming loans at June 30, 2018 is secured by real estate. Our nonperforming loans have been written down to approximately 62% of their original nonperforming balance. We have evaluated the underlying collateral on these loans and believe that the collateral on these loans is sufficient to minimize future losses. Based on the level of coverage on nonperforming loans and analysis of our loan portfolio, we believe the allowance for loan losses of $16.1 million as of June 30, 2018 to be adequate.

As a general practice, most of our loans are originated with relatively short maturities of less than 10 years. As a result, when a loan reaches its maturity we frequently renew the loan and thus extend its maturity using the same credit standards as those used when the loan was first originated. Due to these loan practices, we may, at times, renew loans which are classified as nonperforming after evaluating the loan’s collateral value and financial strength of its guarantors. Nonperforming loans are renewed at terms generally consistent with the ultimate source of repayment and rarely at reduced rates. In these cases, we will seek additional credit enhancements, such as additional collateral or additional guarantees to further protect the loan. When a loan is no longer performing in accordance with its stated terms, we will typically seek performance under the guarantee.

In addition, at June 30, 2018, 83% of our loans are collateralized by real estate and 77% of our impaired loans are secured by real estate. We utilize third party appraisers to determine the fair value of collateral dependent loans. Our current loan and appraisal policies require us to obtain updated appraisals on an annual basis, either through a new external appraisal or an appraisal evaluation. Impaired loans are individually reviewed on a quarterly basis to determine the level of impairment. As of June 30, 2018, we do not have any impaired real estate loans carried at a value in excess of the appraised value. We typically charge-off a portion or create a specific reserve for impaired loans when we do not expect repayment to occur as agreed upon under the original terms of the loan agreement.

At June 30, 2018, impaired loans totaled $15.1 million for which $8.3 million of these loans have a reserve of approximately $3.5 million allocated in the allowance. During the first six months of 2018, the average recorded investment in impaired loans was approximately $15.4 million. Comparatively, impaired loans totaled $12.4 million at December 31, 2017, of which $8.0 million had a reserve of approximately $3.7 million allocated in the allowance. During 2017, the average recorded investment in impaired loans was approximately $13.0 million.

We consider a loan to be a TDR when the debtor experiences financial difficulties and we provide concessions such that we will not collect all principal and interest in accordance with the original terms of the loan agreement. Concessions can relate to the contractual interest rate, maturity date, or payment structure of the note. As part of our workout plan for individual loan relationships, we may restructure loan terms to assist borrowers facing challenges in the current economic environment. As of June 30, 2018, we determined that we had loans totaling $10.6 million that we considered TDRs. As of December 31, 2017, we had loans totaling $7.8 million that we considered TDRs.

Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses was $16.1 million and $15.4 million at June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, or 1.05% of outstanding loans at June 30, 2018 and 1.19% of outstanding loans at June 30, 2017. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, we charged-off $604,000 of loans and recorded $281,000 of recoveries on loans previously charged-off, for net charge-offs of $323,000, or 0.04% of average loans, annualized. Comparatively, we charged-off $563,000 of loans and recorded $152,000 of recoveries on loans previously charged-off, resulting in net charge-offs of $411,000, or 0.03% of average loans, annualized, for the first six months of 2017.

At December 31, 2017, our allowance for loan losses was $15.5 million, or 1.12% of outstanding loans, and we had net loans charged-off of $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.

38


Following is a summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses.

                        
      Six months ended      
June 30, Year ended
(dollars in thousands) 2018 2017 December 31, 2017
Balance, beginning of period $      15,523 $      14,855 14,855
Provision 900 1,000 2,000
Loan charge-offs (604 ) (563 ) (1,638 )
Loan recoveries 281 152 306
Net loan charge-offs (323 ) (411 ) (1,332 )
Balance, end of period $ 16,100 $    15,444              15,523

Deposits and Other Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Our primary source of funds for loans and investments is our deposits, advances from the FHLB, and structured repurchase agreements. In the past, we have chosen to obtain a portion of our certificates of deposits from areas outside of our market in order to obtain longer term deposits than are readily available in our local market. Our internal guidelines regarding the use of brokered CDs limit our brokered CDs to 20% of total deposits. In addition, we do not obtain time deposits of $100,000 or more through the Internet. These guidelines allow us to take advantage of the attractive terms that wholesale funding can offer while mitigating the related inherent risk.

Our retail deposits represented $1.5 billion, or 96.8% of total deposits at June 30, 2018, while our out-of-market, or brokered, deposits represented $50 million, or 3.2% of our total deposits at June 30, 2018. At December 31, 2017, retail deposits represented $1.4 billion, or 98.0% of our total deposits, and brokered CDs were $28.1 million, representing 2.0% of our total deposits. Our loan-to-deposit ratio was 97.8% at June 30, 2018 and 100.4% at December 31, 2017.

The following is a detail of our deposit accounts:

         
      June 30,       December 31,
(dollars in thousands) 2018 2017
Non-interest bearing $      310,709 295,680
Interest bearing:
NOW accounts 251,511 229,945
Money market accounts 659,353 545,029
Savings 15,913 16,298
Time, less than $100,000 60,632 55,461
Time and out-of-market deposits, $100,000 and over 269,864 238,710
Total deposits $ 1,567,982 1,381,123

During the past 12 months, we continued our focus on increasing core deposits, which exclude out-of-market deposits and time deposits of $250,000 or more, in order to provide a relatively stable funding source for our loan portfolio and other earning assets. Our core deposits were $1.4 billion and $1.2 billion at June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, respectively.

39


The following table shows the average balance amounts and the average rates paid on deposits.

     
      Six months ended
June 30,
2018       2017
(dollars in thousands) Amount       Rate Amount       Rate
Noninterest bearing demand deposits $ 295,058 -% 250,937 -%
Interest bearing demand deposits 237,020 0.16% 222,677 0.19%
Money market accounts 617,359 1.20% 401,634 0.69%
Savings accounts 16,002 0.06% 15,583 0.05%
Time deposits less than $100,000 57,797 1.23% 49,176 0.75%
Time deposits greater than $100,000 264,577 1.55% 251,836 0.99%
Total deposits $      1,487,813      0.85%      1,191,843      0.51%

During the six months ended June 30, 2018, our average transaction account balances increased by $274.6 million, or 30.8%, from the six months ended June 31, 2017, while our average time deposit balances increased by $21.4 million during the same six month period.

All of our time deposits are certificates of deposits. The maturity distribution of our time deposits of $100,000 or more at June 30, 2018 was as follows:

       
(dollars in thousands)       June 30, 2018
Three months or less $ 52,586
Over three through six months 38,507
Over six through twelve months 74,713
Over twelve months 104,058
Total $ 269,864

Included in time deposits of $100,000 or more at June 30, 2018 is $30 million of wholesale CDs scheduled to mature within the next 12 months at a weighted average rate of 1.73%. Time deposits that meet or exceed the FDIC insurance limit of $250,000 at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were $180.1 million and $131.7 million, respectively.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity represents the ability of a company to convert assets into cash or cash equivalents without significant loss, and the ability to raise additional funds by increasing liabilities. Liquidity management involves monitoring our sources and uses of funds in order to meet our day-to-day cash flow requirements while maximizing profits. Liquidity management is made more complicated because different balance sheet components are subject to varying degrees of management control. For example, the timing of maturities of our investment portfolio is fairly predictable and subject to a high degree of control at the time investment decisions are made. However, net deposit inflows and outflows are far less predictable and are not subject to the same degree of control.

At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, our liquid assets, consisting of cash and due from banks and federal funds sold, amounted to $109.4 million and $92.2 million, or 6.1% and 5.7% of total assets, respectively. Our investment securities at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 amounted to $73.1 million and $72.1 million, or 4.1% and 4.4% of total assets, respectively. The increase in cash and cash equivalents is primarily attributable to our effort to increase the amount of on balance sheet liquidity. In addition, investment securities traditionally provide a secondary source of liquidity since they can be converted into cash in a timely manner; however, approximately 6% of these securities are pledged against outstanding debt. Therefore, the related debt would need to be repaid prior to the securities being sold in order for these securities to be converted to cash.

Our ability to maintain and expand our deposit base and borrowing capabilities serves as our primary source of liquidity. We plan to meet our future cash needs through the liquidation of temporary investments, the generation of deposits, loan payoffs, and from additional borrowings. In addition, we will receive cash upon the maturity and sale of loans and the maturity of investment securities. We maintain four federal funds purchased lines of credit with correspondent banks totaling $72.0 million for which there were no borrowings against the lines of credit at June 30, 2018.

40


We are also a member of the FHLB, from which applications for borrowings can be made. The FHLB requires that securities, qualifying mortgage loans, and stock of the FHLB owned by the Bank be pledged to secure any advances from the FHLB. The unused borrowing capacity currently available from the FHLB at June 30, 2018 was $262.7 million, based on the Bank’s $2.5 million investment in FHLB stock, as well as qualifying mortgages available to secure any future borrowings. However, we are able to pledge additional securities to the FHLB in order to increase our available borrowing capacity. In addition, at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 we had $231.3 million and $165.1 million, respectively, of letters of credit outstanding with the FHLB to secure client deposits.

We also have a line of credit with another financial institution for $15.0 million, which was unused at June 30, 2018. The line of credit bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.50% and matures on June 30, 2020.

We believe that our existing stable base of core deposits, borrowings from the FHLB, and short-term repurchase agreements will enable us to successfully meet our long-term liquidity needs. However, as short-term liquidity needs arise, we have the ability to sell a portion of our investment securities portfolio to meet those needs.

Total shareholders’ equity was $160.9 million at June 30, 2018 and $149.7 million at December 31, 2017. The $11.2 million increase from December 31, 2017 is primarily related to net income of $10.7 million during the first half of 2018, $638,000 from the exercise of stock options, and $717,000 of equity compensation expense, partially offset by a $909,000 decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income.

The following table shows the return on average assets (net income divided by average total assets), return on average equity (net income divided by average equity), equity to assets ratio (average equity divided by average assets), and tangible common equity ratio (total equity less preferred stock divided by total assets) annualized for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2017. Since our inception, we have not paid cash dividends.

         
      June 30, 2018       December 31, 2017
Return on average assets 1.27% 0.87%
Return on average equity 13.95% 9.66%
Return on average common equity 13.95% 9.66%
Average equity to average assets ratio 9.11% 8.98%
Tangible common equity to assets ratio 9.00% 9.21%

Under the capital adequacy guidelines, regulatory capital is classified into two tiers. These guidelines require an institution to maintain a certain level of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital to risk-weighted assets. Tier 1 capital consists of common shareholders’ equity, excluding the unrealized gain or loss on securities available for sale, minus certain intangible assets. In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, all assets, including certain off-balance sheet assets, are multiplied by a risk-weight factor of 0% to 100% based on the risks believed to be inherent in the type of asset. Tier 2 capital consists of Tier 1 capital plus the general reserve for loan losses, subject to certain limitations. We are also required to maintain capital at a minimum level based on total average assets, which is known as the Tier 1 leverage ratio.

At both the holding company and Bank level, we are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. The capital rules require banks and bank holding companies to maintain a minimum total risked-based capital ratio of at least 8%, a total Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6%, a minimum common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 4.5%, and a leverage ratio of at least 4%. Bank holding companies and banks are also required to hold a capital conservation buffer of common equity Tier 1 capital of 2.5% to avoid limitations on capital distributions and discretionary executive compensation payments. The capital conservation buffer will be phased in incrementally over time, becoming fully effective on January 1, 2019, and will consist of an additional amount of common equity equal to 2.5% of risk-weighted assets.

41


To be considered “well-capitalized” for purposes of certain rules and prompt corrective action requirements, the Bank must maintain a minimum total risked-based capital ratio of at least 10%, a total Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 8%, a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6.5%, and a leverage ratio of at least 5%. As of June 30, 2018, our capital ratios exceed these ratios and we remain “well capitalized.”

The following table summarizes the capital amounts and ratios of the Bank and the regulatory minimum requirements.

 
    June 30, 2018
To be well capitalized
under prompt
For capital corrective
adequacy purposes action provisions
Actual minimum minimum
(dollars in thousands) Amount     Ratio     Amount     Ratio     Amount     Ratio
Total Capital (to risk weighted assets) $     186,631 12.46 % $     119,814 8.00 % $     149,768 10.00%
Tier 1 Capital (to risk weighted assets) 170,531 11.39 % 89,861 6.00 % 119,814 8.00%
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to risk weighted assets) 170,531 11.39 % 67,396 4.50 % 97,349 6.50%
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets) 170,531 9.69 % 70,374 4.00 % 87,967 5.00%
 
December 31, 2017
To be well capitalized
under prompt
For capital corrective
adequacy purposes action provisions
Actual minimum minimum
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio   Amount Ratio
Total Capital (to risk weighted assets) $ 175,016 12.99 % $ 107,749 8.00 % $   134,686 10.00%
Tier 1 Capital (to risk weighted assets) 159,493 11.84 % 80,812 6.00 % 107,749 8.00%
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to risk weighted assets) 159,493 11.84 % 60,609 4.50 % 87,546 6.50%
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets) 159,493 10.04 % 63,573 4.00 % 79,466 5.00%

The following table summarizes the capital amounts and ratios of the Company and the minimum regulatory requirements.

 
  June 30, 2018
       To be well capitalized
under prompt
For capital corrective
adequacy purposes action provisions
Actual minimum minimum
(dollars in thousands) Amount Ratio     Amount       Ratio Amount Ratio
Total Capital (to risk weighted assets) $    191,321 12.77 % $    119,814 8.00 % N/A N/A
Tier 1 Capital (to risk weighted assets) 175,221 11.70 % 89,861 6.00 % N/A N/A
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to risk weighted assets) 162,221 10.83 % 67,396 4.50 % N/A N/A
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets) 175,221 9.96 % 70,392 4.00 % N/A N/A
 
December 31, 2017
  To be well capitalized
under prompt
For capital corrective
adequacy purposes action provisions
Actual minimum minimum
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount     Ratio
Total Capital (to risk weighted assets) $ 178,665  13.27 % $ 107,749 8.00 % N/A N/A
Tier 1 Capital (to risk weighted assets) 163,142 12.11 % 80,812 6.00 % N/A N/A
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to risk weighted assets) 150,142 11.15 % 60,609 4.50 % N/A N/A
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets) 163,142 10.26 % 63,573 4.00 % N/A N/A

42


The ability of the Company to pay cash dividends is dependent upon receiving cash in the form of dividends from the Bank. The dividends that may be paid by the Bank to the Company are subject to legal limitations and regulatory capital requirements.

EFFECT OF INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES

The effect of relative purchasing power over time due to inflation has not been taken into account in our consolidated financial statements. Rather, our financial statements have been prepared on an historical cost basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Unlike most industrial companies, our assets and liabilities are primarily monetary in nature. Therefore, the effect of changes in interest rates will have a more significant impact on our performance than will the effect of changing prices and inflation in general. In addition, interest rates may generally increase as the rate of inflation increases, although not necessarily in the same magnitude. As discussed previously, we seek to manage the relationships between interest sensitive assets and liabilities in order to protect against wide rate fluctuations, including those resulting from inflation.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend money to a client as long as the client has not violated any material condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require the payment of a fee. At June 30, 2018, unfunded commitments to extend credit were $377.3 million, of which $131.5 million was at fixed rates and $245.8 million was at variable rates. At December 31, 2017, unfunded commitments to extend credit were $310.6 million, of which approximately $85.2 million was at fixed rates and $225.4 million was at variable rates. A significant portion of the unfunded commitments related to consumer equity lines of credit. Based on historical experience, we anticipate that a significant portion of these lines of credit will not be funded. We evaluate each client’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by us upon extension of credit, is based on our credit evaluation of the borrower. The type of collateral varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and commercial and residential real estate.

At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, there were commitments under letters of credit for $5.3 million and $6.3 million, respectively. The credit risk and collateral involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. Since most of the letters of credit are expected to expire without being drawn upon, they do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

A portion of our business is to originate mortgage loans that will be sold in the secondary market to investors. Loan types that we originate include conventional loans, jumbo loans and other governmental agency loan products. We adhere to the legal lending limits and guidelines as set forth by the various governmental agencies and investors to whom we sell loans. Under a “best efforts” selling procedure, we make our best effort to process, fund, and deliver the loan to a particular investor. If the loan fails to fund, there is no immediate cost to us, as the market risk has been transferred to the investor. In the event of a customer loan default, we may be required to reimburse the investor.

Except as disclosed in this report, we are not involved in off-balance sheet contractual relationships, unconsolidated related entities that have off-balance sheet arrangements or transactions that could result in liquidity needs or other commitments that significantly impact earnings.

MARKET RISK AND INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY

Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and rates, which principally arises from interest rate risk inherent in our lending, investing, deposit gathering, and borrowing activities. Other types of market risks, such as foreign currency exchange rate risk and commodity price risk, do not generally arise in the normal course of our business.

43


We actively monitor and manage our interest rate risk exposure in order to control the mix and maturities of our assets and liabilities utilizing a process we call asset/liability management. The essential purposes of asset/liability management are to ensure adequate liquidity and to maintain an appropriate balance between interest sensitive assets and liabilities in order to minimize potentially adverse impacts on earnings from changes in market interest rates. Our asset/liability management committee (“ALCO”) monitors and considers methods of managing exposure to interest rate risk. We have both an internal ALCO consisting of senior management that meets at various times during each month and a board ALCO that meets monthly. The ALCOs are responsible for maintaining the level of interest rate sensitivity of our interest sensitive assets and liabilities within board-approved limits.

As of June 30, 2018, the following table summarizes the forecasted impact on net interest income using a base case scenario given upward and downward movements in interest rates of 100, 200, and 300 basis points based on forecasted assumptions of prepayment speeds, nominal interest rates and loan and deposit repricing rates. Estimates are based on current economic conditions, historical interest rate cycles and other factors deemed to be relevant. However, underlying assumptions may be impacted in future periods which were not known to management at the time of the issuance of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Therefore, management’s assumptions may or may not prove valid. No assurance can be given that changing economic conditions and other relevant factors impacting our net interest income will not cause actual occurrences to differ from underlying assumptions. In addition, this analysis does not consider any strategic changes to our balance sheet which management may consider as a result of changes in market conditions.

      Change in net interest
Interest rate scenario income from base
Up 300 basis points                          (0.47 )%
Up 200 basis points 0.47 %
Up 100 basis points 0.73 %
Base -
Down 100 basis points (4.67 )%
Down 200 basis points (7.15 )%
Down 300 basis points (7.08 )%

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

We have adopted various accounting policies that govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and with general practices within the banking industry in the preparation of our financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are described in the footnotes to our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2017, as filed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions by us that have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. We consider these accounting policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgment and assumptions we use are based on historical experience and other factors, which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Our Critical Accounting Policies are the allowance for loan losses, fair value of financial instruments, other-than-temporary impairment analysis, other real estate owned, and income taxes. Because of the nature of the judgment and assumptions we make, actual results could differ from these judgments and estimates that could have a material impact on the carrying values of our assets and liabilities and our results of operations.

ACCOUNTING, REPORTING, AND REGULATORY MATTERS

See Note 1 – Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation in the accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for details of recently issued accounting pronouncements and their expected impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

44


Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

See Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Market Risk and Interest Rate Sensitivity.

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2018, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
We are a party to claims and lawsuits arising in the course of normal business activities. Management is not aware of any material pending legal proceedings against the Company which, if determined adversely, would have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 1A RISK FACTORS.
Investing in shares of our common stock involves certain risks, including those identified and described in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, as well as cautionary statements contained in this Form 10-Q, including those under the caption “Cautionary Warning Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” set forth in Part 1, Item 2 of this Form 10-Q, risks and matters described elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, and in our other filings with the SEC.

There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A. of Part I in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
None.

Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
None.

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not applicable.

Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.

Item 6. EXHIBITS.
The exhibits required to be filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are listed in the Index to Exhibits attached hereto and are incorporated herein by reference.

45


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

SOUTHERN FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.
Registrant
 
 
Date: July 31, 2018 /s/ R. Arthur Seaver, Jr.   
R. Arthur Seaver, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
Date: July 31, 2018 /s/ Michael D. Dowling     
Michael D. Dowling
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

46


INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit      
Number Description
31.1 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Principal Executive Officer.
 
31.2 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Principal Financial Officer.
 
32 Section 1350 Certifications.
 
101 The following materials from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern First Bancshares, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

47