GLOBALSCAPE INC - FORM 10-K/A

Attached files

file	filename
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - GLOBALSCAPE INC	ex32-1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-32.2 - GLOBALSCAPE INC	ex31-2.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - GLOBALSCAPE INC	ex31-1.htm
EX-23.1 - EX-23.1 - GLOBALSCAPE INC	ex23-1.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K /A Number 1

☒	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File No. 001-33601

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		74-2785449
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

4500 Lockhill-Selma, Suite 150
San Antonio, Texas		78249
(Address of Principal Executive Office)		(Zip Code)

(210) 308-8267

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share	NYSE American LLC
(Title of Class)	(Name of exchange on which registered)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

☐ Yes ☒ No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

☐ Yes ☒ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

☐ Yes ☒ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every

Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

☐ Yes ☒ No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐ Yes ☒ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Large Accelerated filer ☐		Accelerated filer ☐

Non-Accelerated filer ☐		Smaller Reporting Company ☒
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

☐ Yes ☒ No

As of June 30, 2016, the last day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $50,513,026 based on the closing sale price as reported on the NYSE MKT.

As of March 20, 2017, there were 21,566,831 shares of common stock outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 10, 2017, are incorporated by reference in Part III hereof.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I

Item 1.	Business	7

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	21

Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	42

Item 2.	Properties	42

Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	42

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	43

PART II

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity	44

Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	44

Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	45

Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	63

Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	93

Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	96

Item 9B.	Other Information	98

PART III

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	99

Item 11.	Executive Compensation	99

Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	99

Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions, and Director Independence	99

Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	99

PART IV

Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	100

Item 16.	10-K Summary	102

Table of Contents

Preliminary Notes

GlobalSCAPE®, CuteFTP®, CuteFTP Pro®, CuteBackup®, DMZ Gateway®, EFT Cloud Services®, GlobalSCAPE Securely Connected®, CuteSendIt®, and Mail Express® are registered trademarks of GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

Secure FTP Server™, Wide Area File Services™, WAFS™, CDP™, Advanced Workflow Engine™, AWE™, , EFT Server™, EFT Workspaces™, Enhanced File Transfer™, Enhanced File Transfer Server™, Secure Ad Hoc Transfer™, SAT™, EFT Server Enterprise™, Enhanced File Transfer Server Enterprise ™, Desktop Transfer Client™, DTC™, Mobile Transfer Client™, MTC™, Web Transfer Client™, Workspaces™, Accelerate™, WTC™, Content Integrity Control™, Advanced Authentication™ and scConnect™ are trademarks of GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

TappIn® and design are registered trademarks of TappIn, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary.

TappIn Secure Share ™, Social Share ™, Now Playing ™, and Enhanced A La Carte Playlist ™, are trademarks of TappIn, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary.

Other trademarks and trade names in this Annual Report are the property of their respective owners.

In this report, we use the following terms:

“B2B” means business-to-business.

“BYOL” means bring your own license.

“Cloud” or “cloud computing” refers to pooled computing resources, delivered on-demand, over the Internet. In the same manner that electricity is delivered on-demand from large scale power plants, cloud computing is delivered from centralized data centers to users all over the world.

“DMZ” or Demilitarized Zone refers to a computer host or perimeter network inserted between a trusted internal network and an untrusted public network such as the Internet.

“FTP” or File Transfer Protocol is a protocol used to exchange or manipulate files over a computer network such as the Internet.

“MFT” or Managed File Transfer refers to software solutions that facilitate the secure transfer of data from one computer to another through a network.

“RFC” or Request for Comment is a memorandum published by the Internet Engineering Task Force describing methods, research, or innovations applicable to the working of the Internet and Internet-connected systems.

“SaaS” or Software-as-a-Service uses hosted, cloud computing approaches in which the customer does not need to install the underlying software on its own computer systems to access the application.

“SSL” or Secure Sockets Layer uses cryptography to encrypt data between the web server and the web browser.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K/A contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. “Forward-looking statements” are those statements that are not of historical fact but describe management’s beliefs and expectations. We have identified many of the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report by using words such as “will”, “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “may,” “expect,” “potentially” and “intend.” Although we believe these expectations are reasonable, our operations involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including those described in the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Therefore, GlobalSCAPE’s actual results could differ materially from those discussed in this Annual Report.

Table of Contents

EXPLANATORY NOTE

GlobalSCAPE, Inc. (together with its wholly-owned subsidiary, “GlobalSCAPE”, the “Company” or “we”) is filing this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (this “Amendment” or “Form 10‑K/A”) to its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, originally filed March 27, 2017 (the “Original Filing”). This Amendment amends and restates (the “Restatement”) the following indicated parts of the Original Filing:

·	Part I, Item 1A: Risk Factors;

·	Part I, Item 3: Legal Proceedings;

·	Part II, Item 6: The selected financial data as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and for the years then ended;

·	Part II, Item 7: Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and for the years then ended;

·	Part II, Item 8: Our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended;

·	Part II, Item 9: Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure;

·	Part II, Item 9A: Controls and Procedures; and

·	Part IV, Item 15: Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

The Restatement results from our determination subsequent to the filing date of the Original Filing that we incorrectly recognized revenue during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 in connection with the sales transactions described below as well as other transactions identified by the Audit Committee’s investigation and management’s analysis.

As a result of the Restatement, no reliance should be placed on financial information we have previously furnished or filed on Forms 10-K, 10-Q (including 10-Q/A) or 8-K, along with all related earnings press releases and similar communications issued by us, subsequent to November 10, 2016. Such items include, but are not limited to:

·	Form 8-K announcing our financial results for the fourth quarter of 2016 and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, furnished on January 26, 2017.

·	Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, filed on March 27, 2017.

·	Form 8-K announcing our financial results for the first quarter of 2017, furnished on April 27, 2017.

·	Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017, filed on May 12, 2017, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A, filed on May 26, 2017.

In the event there are discrepancies between this Amendment and previous reports, press releases and similar communications, the information in this Amendment shall control.

Background of the Restatement

On August 7, 2017, we announced that the Audit Committee (the “Audit Committee”) of our Board of Directors, assisted by outside legal counsel and independent forensic accountants, had been conducting an investigation into certain transactions in the fourth quarter of 2016. We publicly disclosed updates regarding the investigation on November 15, 2017 and March 16, 2018. That investigation, which is now complete, identified transactions which were recorded inconsistently with the Company’s stated revenue recognition policies and criteria as described in our discussion of our significant accounting policies in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 below.

Table of Contents

On August 7, 2017, we filed a Current Report on Form 8-K (the “August 8-K”) announcing that:

·	The Audit Committee had been conducting an investigation into certain transactions in the fourth quarter of 2016 involving improper arrangements with customers that circumvented the Company’s internal controls and their potential effect on previously reported revenue.

Based on the results of the investigation as of August 7, 2017, the improper arrangements with customers that circumvented the Company’s internal controls had the effect of overstating the reported amounts of accounts receivable at December 31, 2016, and license revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2016, and for the year ended December 31, 2016, by approximately $403,000 and $396,000, respectively.

As a result of issues identified through August 1, 2017 in the investigation, the Audit Committee, in consultation with management, concluded that previously issued financial statements, covering one or more years or interim periods for which GlobalSCAPE is required to provide financial statements under Regulation S-X should no longer be relied upon because of an error in such financial statements as addressed in FASB ASC Topic 250, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. We stated that the financial statements that should no longer be relied upon were (i) the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 included in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A and (ii) the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (including the interim periods within that year).

The preliminary findings of the Audit Committee’s investigation at the time of the filing of the August 8-K involved a total of four transactions, which occurred in December 2016. The first three related to invoices whereby all conditions necessary to recognize revenue from the sales at December 31, 2016 were not met. Specifically, as of December 31, 2016, and subsequent thereto, the amounts of these sales were not fixed or determinable and collection of all or any portion of these amounts could not be reasonably assured. Accordingly, these sales did not meet all of the necessary criteria for revenue recognition during the three months ended December 31, 2016. In addition, in December 2016, we issued one invoice to a customer whereby certain of our operating personnel had been informed by the customer that its employee who placed the order was not authorized to do so and that the customer was not committing to complete the purchase in the absence of an approved authorization. As a result, as of December 31, 2016, and subsequent thereto, the collection of all or any portion of this sale amount could not be reasonably assured. Accordingly, this sale also did not meet all of the necessary criteria for it to be recognized as revenue during the three months ended December 31, 2016.

As a result of these four transactions (the “Initial Transactions”) which were reported in the August 8-K, our consolidated financial statements in the Original Filing were misstated as follows:

·	Revenue for fiscal 2016 and for the three months ended December 31, 2016 was overstated by $396,000;

·	Accounts receivable as of December 31, 2016 were overstated by $403,000;

·	Sales commissions and royalties expenses for fiscal 2016 and for the three months ended December 31, 2016, and the liabilities associated with those expenses as of December 31, 2016, were overstated by $42,000 and $26,000, respectively; and

·	Income tax expense for fiscal 2016, and for the three months ended December 31, 2016, and federal income tax receivable as of December 31, 2016, were overstated by $111,000.

Additional Findings Related to Revenue Recognition

Subsequent to the filing of the August 8-K, the Audit Committee and management identified additional transactions which occurred during 2016 in which revenue was recorded inconsistently with the Company’s stated revenue recognition policies and criteria, including:

·	Transactions in which license activation keys did not appear to have been delivered to the customer in the period in which the sale was recorded;

·	Transactions appearing to contain side deal terms negotiated with customers but not reflected in the underlying sales documentation;

Table of Contents

·	Transactions in which a sale was recorded although the customer had not yet responded to the Company’s request to provide a commitment to purchase;

·	Transactions in which a sale was made to a reseller whereby collection was not reasonably assured due to payment or other nonstandard terms not consistent with the Company’s revenue recognition policy;

·	Transactions in which there was either no purchase order or a purchase order dated after the date of the end of the period for which revenue had been previously recognized; and

·	One transaction which included incorrect vendor specific objective evidence allocation.

As a result of these additional transactions identified by the Audit Committee and management, in addition to the effects on our consolidated financial statements from the Initial Transactions, our consolidated financial statements in the Original Filing were misstated as follows:

·	Revenue for fiscal 2016 and for the three months ended December 31, 2016 was overstated by $345,000;

·	Accounts receivable as of December 31, 2016 were overstated by $273,000;

·	Sales commissions and royalties expenses for fiscal 2016 and for the three months ended December 31, 2016, and the liabilities associated with those expenses as of December 31, 2016, were overstated by $25,000 and $17,000, respectively; and

·	Income tax expense for fiscal 2016, and for the three months ended December 31, 2016, and federal income tax receivable as of December 31, 2016, were overstated by $114,000.

In addition to the items above, management has also adjusted our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 to account for immaterial misstatements identified in those consolidated financial statements included in the Original Filing. These additional adjustments resulted in an overall decrease in expense before tax of $32,000 in 2016. In addition, the following adjustments were made to our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 from the amounts included in the Original Filing:

·	General and Administrative expense before tax was understated by $2,000;

·	Accounts receivable as of December 31, 2015 was understated by $63,000;

·	Additional paid-in capital as of December 31, 2015 was understated by $65,000; and

·	Retained earnings as of December 31, 2015 was overstated by $2,000.

These changes in our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 are in addition to the changes previously disclosed in the Original Filing as a result of changes in accounting methods and in the classification and presentation of our business activities in our consolidated financial statements. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in this 10-K/A in Part II, Item 8.

Internal Control Deficiencies and Remedial Actions

As further discussed in Part II, Item 9A of this Form 10-K/A under the caption “Controls and Procedures,” during the course of its investigation, the Audit Committee determined that internal control deficiencies existed with respect to our revenue recognition process. The Audit Committee concluded that these internal control deficiencies constituted material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. As a result, we have concluded that:

·	Our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2016; and

Our internal control over financial reporting was not effective to provide reasonable assurances regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, as of December 31, 2016.

We analyzed the impact of the misstatements from the identified material weaknesses and concluded that it did not have a material impact on our financial information in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed for each of the first three quarters of 2016 and 2015. Notwithstanding the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we have concluded that the consolidated financial statements and other financial information included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed for each of the first three quarters of 2016 and 2015, fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows as of, and for, the periods presented.

Table of Contents

The foregoing has been approved by our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, who have been involved with the reassessment and analysis of our internal controls over financial reporting.

As a result of its investigation, the Audit Committee has made recommendations to the Board of Directors and management as to the manner in which it believes our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal controls over financial reporting should be improved. The Board of Directors has approved these recommendations and instructed management to implement them. These recommendations include:

Clearly defining and communicating the management-approved, standard terms and conditions that may be offered to customers during the sales process and requiring appropriate management approval of requested deviations from these standard terms and conditions before a sale is consummated with a customer and a sales invoice is created.

·	Creating and implementing a policy clearly stating that all terms and conditions of agreements with customers are to be recorded in writing, communicated to finance and accounting personnel, and recorded in our permanent records prior to the creation of a sales invoice.

·	Conducting periodic training sessions and briefings with personnel to communicate our policies and procedures regarding the standard terms and conditions that we offer to customers and how we document and communicate approved deviations from those standard terms and conditions.

·	Enhancing the breadth and depth of the review by finance and accounting personnel of sales invoices and underlying supporting documentation to ensure that unusual items are identified and considered when determining the appropriate revenue recognition.

Establishing a total invoice dollar amount threshold over which finance and accounting personnel must examine all actual invoices and supporting documentation to confirm the purchase by the customer and to confirm that all the appropriate revenue recognition criteria have been met prior to recognition.

·	Publishing guidelines that personnel can reference which set forth the requirements to be met for revenue to be recognized from a sale transaction and conducting periodic meetings with personnel to educate and remind them of these guidelines.

Management has provided the Audit Committee with a formal remediation plan based on the foregoing that the Audit Committee has approved and management is currently implementing.

Change in Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

As further described in more detail in Part II, Item 9 of this Form 10-K/A under the caption “Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure,” our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “2015 Financial Statements”) had been audited by Padgett, Stratemann & Co., L.L.P. (“Padgett”) and our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “2016 Financial Statements”) had been audited by RSM US LLP (“RSM”). In connection with the Restatement, we had engaged RSM to audit the 2016 Financial Statements. On November 21, 2017, RSM delivered a withdrawal letter to the Chairman of the Audit Committee. In its withdrawal letter, RSM stated that as of November 21, 2017, it had not completed the audit procedures necessary to reissue its report on the 2016 Financial Statements. On December 1, 2017, the Chairman of the Audit Committee received a letter from Padgett that stated that Padgett had concluded that it cannot rely on management’s representations that would be necessary for Padgett to complete the audit procedures necessary to issue consents to the inclusion of its audit report on the 2015 Financial Statements.

As a result of the withdrawal of RSM and the notification from Padgett that it could not issue consents to the inclusion of its audit report on the 2015 Financial Statements, on December 13, 2017, the Audit Committee expanded the initial appointment of Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P. (“Weaver”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm with respect to the audit of the Company’s financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 to also include serving as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm with respect to the audit of the 2015 Financial Statements and the 2016 Financial Statements. This Form 10-K/A includes the audit report of Weaver with respect to the 2015 Financial Statements and the 2016 Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

See Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K/A for the impact of all of the adjustments to our consolidated financial statements in our Original Filing to correct those consolidated financial statements for the effects of the misstatements described above.

For convenience of the reader, this Form 10-K/A sets forth the Original Filing in its entirety, as amended by, and to reflect, the Restatement. Other than with respect to matters related to the Restatement and related matters (including legal proceedings, government investigations and subsequent events), the Company’s late filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the consequences therefrom and to correct other immaterial errors, we have not modified or updated disclosures presented in the Original Filing. Accordingly, this Form 10-K/A does not reflect events occurring after the Original Filing and does not modify or update those disclosures affected by subsequent events, except as specifically referenced herein. Information not affected by the Restatement is unchanged and reflects the disclosures made at the time of the Original Filing on March 27, 2017. References to the annual report on Form 10-K herein shall refer to the annual report on Form 10-K originally filed on March 27, 2017.

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. Business

Company Overview

We develop and sell computer software that provides secure information exchange, data transfer and sharing capabilities for enterprises and consumers. We have been in business for over twenty years and have sold our products to thousands of enterprises and more than one million individual consumers throughout the world.

Our primary business is selling and supporting managed file transfer, or MFT, software for enterprises. MFT software facilitates the transfer of data from one location to another across a computer network within a single enterprise or between multiple computer networks in multiple enterprises. The brand name of our MFT product platform is Enhanced File Transfer, or EFT.

We earn most of our revenue from the sale of EFT and products that are part of our EFT platform. We earn revenue from the sale of perpetual software licenses, providing products under software-as-a-service, or SaaS, subscriptions, providing maintenance and support services, or M&S, and offering professional services for product configuration and integration.

We also sell other products that are synergistic to EFT including Mail Express, WAFS, and CuteFTP. Collectively, these products constituted less than 10% of our total revenue in 2016.

We focus on selling our EFT platform products in a business-to-business environment. We expect that the majority of the resources we will expend in the future for product research, development, marketing and sales will focus on our EFT platform products. We believe our products and business capabilities are well-positioned to compete effectively in the market for MFT products.

For a more comprehensive discussion of the products we sell and the services we offer, see Software Products and Services below.

We have won multiple awards for performance and reputation, including:

·	In 2016 and 2017:

-	Recognized for three Info Security Products Guide 2017 Global Excellence Awards for distinguished achievements in product innovation in categories that included:

§	Innovation in Compliance (Gold Winner) – Enhanced File Transfer

§	Cloud/SaaS Solutions (Gold Winner) – EFT Cloud Services

§	BYOD Security (Bronze Winner) – EFT Workspaces

-	Recognized as a 2016 Top Workplace by San Antonio Express-News, marking GlobalSCAPE’s sixth recognition as a Top Workplace in San Antonio.

-	Selected for CRN’s 2016 Cloud Computing Partner Program Guide.

-	Certified as a great workplace by the independent analysts at Great Place to Work.

-	Recognized for product excellence by the 2016 Golden Bridge Awards in several categories, including:

§	EFT – Gold Winner in Access Compliance and Risk Management

§	EFT Cloud Services – Gold Winner in Managed File Transfer

-	Recognized for distinguished product achievements by Network Products Guide’s 2016 IT World Awards in several categories, including:

§	The Workspaces module, a part of EFT – Gold Winner in BYOD Security

§	EFT – Bronze Winner in Compliance

§	Mail Express – Bronze Winner in Email Security and Management

-	Named by Computerworld as one of the best companies to work for in IT for the third consecutive year with a ranking of #3 in the small company category.

-	Recognized by the San Antonio Business Journal as a 2016 Best Place to Work, making this the fifth time GlobalSCAPE has received this honor.

-	Honored as the HR Employer of the Year and Excellence in Engagement Strategy in North America by the HRO Today Services and Technology Association.

-	Received a 5-Star rating in The Channel Company’s CRN 2016 Partner Program Guide for the second year in a row.

Table of Contents

-	Named by Texas Monthly magazine as one of the best companies to work for in Texas for the sixth year in a row with a ranking of #16 in the medium size category.

-	Received Info Security Products Guide 2016 Global Excellence Awards for distinguished achievements in product innovation that included:

§	EFT Workspaces – Gold Winner in BYOD Security.

§	Enhanced File Transfer – Silver Winner in Compliance.

§	EFT Cloud Services – Bronze Winner in Cloud Security.

§	Mail Express – Bronze Winner in Email Security and Management.

-	Named as Leader in Secure Information Exchange Services 2016 – Texas by the Corp America 2016 Small Cap Awards.

In 2015:

Listed as a Champion in the Ad-Hoc Mid-Market category and a Leader in the Ad-Hoc Enterprise use case by Info-Tech Research Group within its Managed File Transfer Vendor Landscape report. This is the second consecutive time that Info-Tech Research Group has named GlobalSCAPE a Champion within this report.

-	Named one of the best places to work in the information technologies small business category by Computerworld for the fourth time.

-	Named as one of San Antonio’s best places to work by the San Antonio Business Journal for the fifth time in the medium size category.

-	Received a 5-Star rating in The Channel Company’s CRN 2015 Partner Program Guide.

-	Named by Texas Monthly magazine as one of the best companies to work for in Texas for the fifth year in a row with a ranking of #3 in the medium size category.

-	Named to the San Antonio Business Journal’s 2015 Fast Track list for companies with $10 million or more in revenue.

-	Named by the San Antonio Express News as the #1 Top Workplace for 2015 in the small company category, and recognized as one of the Top Workplaces for the fifth time.

-	Two members of the channel leadership team recognized as The Channel Company’s 2015 CRN Channel Chiefs.

-	Two channel team members named to The Channel Company’s 2015 CRN Women of the Channel list.

-	Recognized by the Golden Bridge Business and Innovation Awards as a Gold Winner in the Managed File Transfer – Innovations category for EFT Workspaces.

-	Recognized by the Info Security Products Guide’s Global Excellence Awards as a Gold Winner within the Compliance category for Enhanced File Transfer (EFT) and as a Bronze Winner within the Email Security and Management category for Mail Express.

-	Recognized by the Network Products Guide awards as a Gold Winner in Compliance Data Centers for EFT v7.0 and a Silver Winner in Email, Security and Management with Mail Express v4.

GlobalSCAPE was incorporated in Delaware in 1996. Our address is 4500 Lockhill-Selma Road, Suite 150, San Antonio, Texas 78249. Our phone number is (210) 308-8267.

Industry Background

Communication across private and public computer networks that facilitates the movement and sharing of information between central and remote locations and with associates, employees, partners, suppliers, and customers is an integral part of daily operations for enterprises of all sizes. Corporate information managers must protect business assets, ensure that policies and processes meet regulations governing the management of sensitive information, and ensure that the right people have access to the right information, at the right place and at the right time. Global operations, diverse business partners and networks further emphasize the need for software applications that ensure compatibility, scalability, privacy, security and cost-effective integration. These requirements have created the need for maintaining the security of data and information in motion (for example, with traditional MFT solutions delivered as on-premises software or as a cloud service) and at rest (for example, through securely deleting or purging files or securely accessing stored data from mobile tablet or smartphone devices).

The increase in high-profile and large scale data breaches in corporate enterprises and government agencies involving access to information in an unauthorized manner have created a heightened awareness of the vulnerability of critical and confidential data. As a result, attention at an unprecedented level is being paid to the security and integrity of systems that store and transfer data electronically. In many cases, this emphasis involves assessing the adequacy of the security, reliability and visibility provided by existing MFT systems.

Table of Contents

The need for secure MFT solutions is particularly strong for organizations faced with a daunting array of privacy, security, and remote accessibility challenges stemming from various regulatory and business requirements for data privacy and confidentiality. Regulatory and privacy requirements include federal legislation and regulations such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA),the Federal Trade Commission Red Flags Rules, as well as state legislation and regulations in the U.S. such as California Senate Bill (SB) 1386 and the data security regulations issued by the Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business, as well as the extraterritorial requirements such as the European Union Data Privacy Directive. Some of these statutes and regulations impose severe penalties for improper disclosure of confidential information. Industry best-practices such as the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) and self-imposed business requirements lead to the need to secure and protect consumer information, intellectual property and trade secrets. Use of secure MFT solutions offer protection against disclosure of proprietary information and also reduce corporate risks associated with the potentially devastating consequences of security breaches.

Our primary industry is known as managed file transfer. The MFT industry has its technical origin in the file transfer protocol, or FTP. FTP dates back to 1980 (RFC 765, later superseded by RFC 959), with even earlier RFCs guiding prior attempts to establish standards for file transfer protocols. The use of file transfer protocols increased dramatically with the explosive growth of the Internet and the World Wide Web during the 1990s. The MFT industry arose from recognition that FTP alone does not provide adequate security and management capabilities for file transfers. MFT solutions offer a greater degree of security and control than FTP. Features available in MFT solutions include integrated security, auditing capabilities, performance monitoring, and reporting. The MFT industry includes low cost, or even free, solutions that offer basic capabilities. However, we believe businesses and even individuals require more advanced solutions that provide scalability, enhanced security options, automated workflow, dedicated maintenance and support, and other features that facilitate high-confidence, secure and cost effective file transfers.

Cloud computing is a model for enabling convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources (e.g., networks, servers, storage, applications, and services) that can be rapidly provisioned, released, and scaled to meet requirements. We believe the continuing movement to cloud services is analogous to the telecommunications shift from dedicated point-to-point circuits to a delivery model in which the entire telecommunications infrastructure potentially can be used to establish, maintain, and manage individual connections on an as-needed basis.

Strategy

We intend to build upon our leadership position in the MFT market to provide businesses, other organizations, and individual users with the solutions necessary to meet their growing need for secure information exchange. From our perspective, fully addressing this need for secure information exchange requires consideration of capabilities beyond traditional MFT, including the sharing of content between both people and businesses, work group collaboration, access to content outside the data center, business-to-business partner enablement, electronic data interchange, integration between systems and information, solution-wide governance, and advanced visibility including analytics, dashboards, and transaction-level control. We intend to use our EFT platform as a foundation for expanding our product offerings into areas adjacent to MFT that are often addressed and managed by the same decision-makers who purchase our EFT platform. Going forward, we intend to focus on determining which areas of our business will contribute to our future growth in their current state, need additional investment to contribute in the desired manner or require further analysis to determine their place in our product offerings.

As we evolve our solution portfolio, we intend to maintain an appropriate balance between legacy and new solutions, including making choices about transitioning, sustaining, or retiring solutions as necessary to best operate under prevailing business conditions. Transitioning or sustaining solutions may involve consolidating capabilities within our solution portfolio, releasing upgrades in response to market or customer needs, or making bug fixes. We also may phase out solutions and earlier versions of our solutions periodically in accordance with our end-of-live, or EOL, policy.

In addition to expanding our products into areas adjacent to MFT, we also believe that we need to continue to expand the means of delivering our MFT products. To that end, we intend to continue expanding our capability to deliver our MFT products through EFT Cloud Services which provides a flexible continuum of features and functions that gives the user the ability to pick and choose the extent to which they want to own or outsource the capabilities of our EFT platform. EFT Cloud Services also provides organizations the flexibility of deploying on-premises, in the cloud or in a hybrid cloud environment with all of the security, compliance, scalability, and visibility features of an on-premises managed file transfer solution. We continually evolve our strategic focus based on our vision for product innovation and development, our assessment of visibility of and demand for our products in the marketplace, and our evaluation of desired approaches for selling and delivering our products. Our strategic focus consists of:

Table of Contents

·	Ongoing innovation of our EFT platform to address the expanding needs of our existing customers and to enhance our products’ appeal to new customers.

·	Licensing, developing and/or acquiring technologies with features and functions that are complementary to and synergistic with our EFT platform so as to expand the breadth of our products offerings.

·	Enhancing our sales and marketing programs to improve identification of potential demand for our products and to increase the rate at which we are successful in selling our products.

Ongoing Innovation of Our EFT platform to Address the Expanding Needs of Our Existing Customers and to Enhance Our Products’ Appeal to New Customers.

We seek to continue to improve and enhance our core technology, primarily in the MFT space, in both breadth and depth. By focusing on the breadth of the product, we seek to pursue different segments of the market to ensure that we have offerings that meet the needs of small and medium businesses, or SMBs, but also scale to meet the demands of larger enterprises. This will require new features and packages to be released to these audiences. We believe that increasing the depth of our products by adding new features will allow us to increase sales to our existing client base by helping them solve additional problems within their organizations. Examples of innovation in our core technology for the 2016 fiscal year included EFT Workspaces, which permits end users to collaborate more effectively in a peer-to-peer relationship without having to rely on central administrators, and EFT Event Rule Enhancements, which expanded our capabilities with workflow optimization and enhanced automation. We will continue to focus on our core technology to ensure its continued success.

Gartner Inc., a notable industry analyst, and International Data Corporation have stated that the annual MFT market is in excess of $700 million. We are a leader in MFT products and services. In 2015, 2013 and 2012, we achieved one of the highest ratings in the Managed File Transfer Vendor Landscape Report from Info-Tech Research Group by being designated a “Champion” in its Vendor Landscape report. Info-Tech Research Group evaluated criteria such as strategy, viability, sales and support reach, and channel partner programs. Its evaluation of our strategy garnered one of the highest possible scores due in part to our focus on security and regulatory compliance. Also playing a role in our rating was the assessment of EFT Enterprise, our primary MFT platform. EFT Enterprise was commended for its ability to meet advanced security requirements, its flexible deployment options and modular architecture. In addition, we also were positioned in the Leader’s quadrant of the Gartner Magic Quadrant for Managed File Transfer in the latest years for which Gartner published this magic quadrant. We have since added adjacent-market capabilities, such as accelerated file transfer, business automation and business activity monitoring, to the EFT platform using our modular solution architecture. We believe that these capabilities are helping underpin the consistent growth in revenue from the EFT platform since they enable additional sales to existing clients and enhance the appeal of our software solutions to prospective, new clients.

With MFT capabilities increasingly being integrated into B2B gateways, data integration, service oriented architecture, and other technical solutions, we believe that the need to keep evolving our solutions and entering adjacent markets also is clear. We continue to believe the market will shift toward consideration of traditional MFT as more of a “feature” than a solution. This shift may take many years, but we believe early recognition of the trend and appropriate strategic planning increase our potential for evolving our solutions in front of the ongoing market changes. Placing our MFT offerings in a unified framework that provides comprehensive solutions to our clients’ information exchange requirements in a secure manner, while enabling users to perform their duties wherever and whenever needed, will be a key strategic element to further establish our market leadership in the broader markets. We believe key features such as collaboration, integration of disparate capabilities and systems into the MFT framework, and enhanced application support around the edge of MFT will increase client value and expand revenue opportunities.

Licensing, Developing and/or Acquiring Technologies With Features and Functions that are Complementary to and Synergistic with our EFT Platform so as to Expand the Breadth of Our Products Offerings.

The second area of strategic focus continues with product innovation but extends beyond pure MFT into adjacent segments and technologies. We have made investments to integrate the capabilities of products and technologies such as Mail Express and scConnect into our EFT platform. We will continue to focus on determining which areas of our business will contribute to our future growth in their current state, need additional investment to contribute in the desired manner, or require further analysis to determine their future strategy.

Table of Contents

Our solution portfolio may evolve over time, for example, through development of new offerings in adjacent markets or through acquisitions of technologies by licensing, partnering or by acquiring companies which own such technologies. We also maintain an active research and development program and work closely with partners and others in the industry to identify new solution opportunities. We also intend to remain alert for attractive opportunities to collaborate with others or perhaps combine other revenue-producing technologies with ours to expand our product offerings and reach.

We have allocated significant resources in recent years to enhancing our existing products and developing new solutions. This strategic focus has resulted in us adding features and functions to our EFT platform products and enhancing our ability to deliver those products to our customers in a variety of ways ranging from an on-premise, perpetual license to a full SaaS offering.

While storing and accessing data in a cloud environment is viable in many circumstances, we believe there also is a significant demand in the marketplace for the ability to access data in a manner similar to that offered by cloud computing but with the data being accessed and stored within the security of computers, servers or data centers owned by or dedicated solely to a particular individual or enterprise, rather than in the cloud. We believe our secure content mobility products potentially can provide or contribute to that functionality. Therefore, we intend to continue to expand and enhance these capabilities.

As we evolve our solution portfolio, we intend to maintain an appropriate balance between legacy and new solutions, including making choices about transitioning, sustaining, or retiring solutions as necessary to best operate under prevailing business conditions. Transitioning or sustaining solutions may involve consolidating capabilities within our solution portfolio, releasing upgrades in response to market or customer needs, making bug fixes, or phasing-out solutions periodically.

Enhancing our sales and marketing programs to improve identification of potential demand for our products and to increase the rate at which we are successful in selling our products.

We intend to sustain a high level of execution of our demand generation activities through our marketing group to provide a continuing flow of sales leads to our direct sales personnel and our channel sales partners. We maintain lead generation programs that helped us to achieve the record revenues in 2016. During 2017, our sales and marketing efforts will continue to focus on enabling our channel partners and engaging their customers and prospects. We will continue to enhance our partner program to reward our partners who participate in our sales and technical certifications and drive new opportunities for us. We believe that our marketing, sales and channel demand generation programs will continue to be a primary growth driver for GlobalSCAPE in 2017 and beyond.

We also intend to continue to emphasize ongoing initiatives to elevate our product and corporate profiles and awareness under the GlobalSCAPE brand. We believe that the transformation of our product lines into a more comprehensive solution architecture will continue to elevate this brand awareness with larger enterprises while still serving the needs of our traditional clients. We will use internal resources as well as outside marketing and communications professionals to support this work.

We conduct business with thousands of organizations around the world. We provide solutions to some of the world’s largest manufacturers, distributors, banks, insurance companies, healthcare providers, automakers, film companies and technology providers. Given the breadth and depth of these market opportunities, we believe the effectiveness of a direct sales approach using only our in-house personnel to sell our products is limited by the number of qualified sales people we can hire and the number of prospective clients to whom they can present our products. Accordingly, throughout 2016, we increased our emphasis on expanding our third-party sales channel relationships and intend to continue doing so for the foreseeable future.

We believe that utilizing and expanding our third-party sales channel relationships allows us to leverage the existing base of sales people in place in those companies and their existing customer relationships. In addition to exposing our products to hundreds, and potentially thousands, of sales people employed by those third-party resellers, our products can benefit from proven sales programs and methodologies in those organizations that are financed and supported by those selling partners. We believe operating an aggressive channel reseller program provides an opportunity for our products to be presented to a notably larger number of potential buyers and in a more rapid fashion than if we attempted the same effort using only our direct salespersons. We will continue to expand and enhance our existing channel relationships while at the same time identifying and engaging additional channel partners. Using this approach, we believe we can maintain and expand the exposure for our products in the marketplace in a manner that would probably take several years for us to accomplish on our own.

Table of Contents

We believe this channel sales program helps us establish and maintain a lower-touch delivery model through which we train these partners to sell and distribute our solutions and provide them sales and marketing tools to support that effort. We utilize this approach to reduce our overall cost of marketing and selling our solutions in areas where it would be costly to establish a presence with our own employees. To facilitate this approach, we host channel partner conferences to provide a forum for exchanging ideas and delivering partner-specific sales education and training. Additionally, channel partners supplement our own demand generation efforts and provide access to client bases that previously would not have been available to us.

Software Products and Services

We develop and sell computer software that provides secure information exchange, file transfer and file sharing capabilities for enterprises and consumers. We have been in business for over twenty years and have sold our products to thousands of enterprises and more than one million individual consumers throughout the world.

Our primary business is selling and supporting MFT software for enterprises. MFT software facilitates the transfer of data from one location to another across a computer network within a single enterprise or between multiple computer networks in multiple enterprises. These transfers may be ongoing, repetitive activities executed by automated software routines that occur without human intervention, or they may be transfers that people create and complete in the absence of automated routines or as a result of ad-hoc, special situations that arise from time-to-time. Examples of enterprise-level activities that rely on MFT software include:

·	Transfer of transactional information within an enterprise on a repetitive basis from one geographic location to another, such as a transfer of deposit and withdrawal information throughout the day from a branch of a bank to a central data processing center at another location.

·	Movement of accumulated information within an enterprise from one data processing application to another on a periodic basis, such as a transfer of bi-weekly payroll information from a payroll system that is used to pay employees to a job cost system that is used to manage the cost of a project.

·	Exchange of information between enterprises to facilitate the completion of one or more business transactions, such as a retailer transmitting inventory purchasing requirements produced by its material requirements planning system to an order entry system at a supplying vendor.

We have multiple revenue streams from our MFT products that include:

·	Perpetual software licenses under which customers install our products in their information systems environment on computers they manage and either own or otherwise procure from a cloud services provider, including deploying our products at a cloud services provider in a BYOL environment.

·	Cloud-based, hosted SaaS solutions that we sell on an ongoing subscription basis resulting in our earning a recurring, monthly subscription fee to access the service.

M&S.

·	Professional services for product installation, integration and training.

We also sell products that can be synergistic to our MFT products. These products have capabilities that:

·	Support information sharing and exchange capabilities using traditional email systems.

·	Enable enterprise file synchronization and sharing.

·	Enhance the ability to replicate, share and backup files within a wide area network or local area network, thereby allowing users to access their data at higher speeds than possible with most alternate approaches.

·	Support file transfers by individuals and small businesses.

We earn most of our revenue from the sale of our MFT products that support business-to-business activities and are strategically focused on selling products in that environment. The majority of our resources that we will expend in the future for product research and development, marketing, and sales will concentrate on the MFT business-to-business market. We believe our products and business capabilities are well-positioned to compete effectively in that market.

Table of Contents

Some of our products support consumer-oriented file transfers and file sharing. Even though these products are profitable on an overall basis, we anticipate the future resources we will expend related to products sold to consumers and the associated revenue we earn from those products will continue to be a minor part of our business.

The discussion following presents a summary description of our specific products and solutions.

Managed File Transfer – Enhanced File Transfer Platform

Enhanced File Transfer, or EFT, is the brand name of our core MFT product platform. EFT was awarded multiple industry awards in compliance categories in 2016 including the 2016 Golden Bridge awards, the Network Product Guide’s 2016 IT World Awards, and the 2016 Info Security Products Guide Global Excellence Awards.

The EFT platform provides users the ability to securely transmit data from one location to another using any number of files of any size or configuration. It facilitates management, monitoring, and reporting on file transfers and delivers advanced data transfer workflow capabilities to move data and information into, out of, and throughout an enterprise. Notable features and capabilities of the EFT platform include:

State-of-the-art, enterprise-level security when transferring information within or between computer networks as well as for collaboration with business partners, customers, and employees. EFT provides automation that supports effective integration of back-end systems. It has built-in regulatory compliance, governance, and visibility controls to provide a means of safely maintaining information. EFT offers a high level of performance and scalability to support operational efficiency and maintain business continuity. Administrative tools are provided at various levels of granularity to allow for complete control and monitoring of file transfer activities.

Transmission of critical information such as financial data, medical records, customer files, vendor files, personnel files, transaction activity, and other similar documents between diverse and geographically separated network infrastructures while supporting a range of information protection approaches to meet privacy and other security requirements. In addition to enabling the secure, flexible transmission of critical information using servers, desktop, and notebook computers and a wide range of network-enabled mobile devices, our products also provide customers with the ability to monitor and audit file transfer activities.

Compliance with government regulations and industry standards relating to the protection of information while allowing users to reduce information systems and technologies costs, increase efficiency, track and audit transactions, and automate processes. Our solutions also provide data replication, acceleration of file transfer, sharing/collaboration, and continuous data backup and recovery to our customers.

The EFT platform provides a common, scalable MFT environment that accommodates a broad family of accompanying modules to provide enterprises with increased security, automation, and performance when compared to traditional FTP-based and e-mail delivery systems. Various, optional modules allow users to select the solution configuration most applicable to their requirements for auditing and reporting, encryption, ad hoc and web-based file transfers, operability in or through a DMZ network, and integration with back-end business processes, including workflow automation capabilities.

During 2015 and 2016, we released new versions of our EFT platform and new modules which added several enhancements and capabilities including:

·	Advanced Authentication Module (AAM) that increases the interoperability of EFT with multiple authentication methods. AAM provides a single source of authentication across a customer’s infrastructure.

Workspaces, which is a file-sharing module that allows employees to create their own groups and assign permissions for those groups, much like a virtual data room, to provide access to files for which they themselves have access on the EFT server. This functionality is accomplished without compromising the security, control, and governance of those files.

A Workspaces Outlook plugin that provides secure ad hoc file transfers via email, providing customers with the reporting features in EFT and combining them with the simplicity and security of sending files with Mail Express. The integration of these two products takes the best features in Mail Express and incorporates them into EFT.

·	Accelerate, which is an accelerated file transfer module that boosts the speed and efficiency of secure data transfers and allows for the fast transfer of large files over disparate geographic distances.

Table of Contents

·	Enhanced compatibility of web transfer client file transfers through HTML5 support in addition to the existing Java Runtime Environment.

·	Increased scalability and business continuity with more flexible, uninterrupted file transfer service.

·	Improved facilitation of PCI DSS version 3.0 compliance with updates to security components, such as PGP and AS2.

·	Enhanced and expanded event rule functionality which improves the ability to integrate our products with client business processes and backend systems

We expect to continue to enhance the EFT platform with capabilities that improve its speed and responsiveness of performance, provide additional administration flexibility supporting cross-platform implementation with our DMZ Gateway solution, offer business activity monitoring, and provide additional language support.

Most EFT customers choose to purchase a perpetual software license for a one-time fee paid at the time of purchase and under which they install the software on equipment they own and/or manage. In almost all cases, they also purchase ongoing M&S for which they pay us a recurring, annual amount that typically is 20% to 30% of the price of the software license.

If a customer prefers to use the capabilities of EFT in a SaaS fashion, we offer EFT Cloud Services for a monthly subscription fee. The EFT platform delivered in this manner has the same features and functionality as our EFT platform installed at a customer site. EFT Cloud Services allows users to reduce their upfront cost and achieve other recognized benefits of cloud-based managed file transfer SaaS subscription solutions, including strong service level agreements for information technologies infrastructure reliability and performance. EFT can also be deployed for customers, on a BYOL basis, in their infrastructures running through Amazon Web Services or Microsoft AZURE. We have also initiated offering EFT Enterprise direct to buyers on a pre-deployed basis in the Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure Marketplaces.

EFT Cloud Services provides a flexible continuum of features and functions that gives the user the ability to pick and choose the extent to which they want to own or outsource the capabilities of our EFT platform. EFT Cloud Services gives organizations the flexibility of deploying on-premises, in the cloud or in a hybrid cloud environment with all of the security, compliance, scalability, and visibility features of an on-premises managed file transfer solution. Users of EFT Cloud Services have the option to work with a variety of top hosting providers that best fit their needs. We offer flexible subscription pricing under one, two, and three-year contracts that can help our customers minimize or eliminate upfront capital expenditures and possibly reduce their ongoing operating costs. Subscription revenue from EFT Cloud Services is increasing but is not yet a material portion of the total revenue from our EFT platform.

Secure Information Sharing and Exchange Solution – Mail Express

Mail Express is a solution that provides secure information sharing and exchange capabilities leveraging traditional email workflow. It is a stand-alone product installed in a client-server environment that allows users to send and receive secure, encrypted e-mail and attachments of virtually unlimited size. Mail Express was a Bronze Winner in Email Security and Management by Network Products Guide’s 2016 IT World Awards.

To broaden the appeal and capabilities of Mail Express, we are developing functionality that integrates the features of Mail Express into the EFT platform. This integration will take the superior control, visibility and monitoring capabilities of the EFT platform and make them available to administrators and users in an email environment. This integrated product will improve operational efficiency by providing a coordinated user interface through which data movement activities using both our EFT and Mail Express products can be managed.

Wide Area File Services Solution - WAFS

Our WAFS software product uses data synchronization to further enhance the ability to replicate, share and backup files within a wide area network or local area network, thereby allowing users to access their data at higher speeds than possible with most alternate approaches. The software uses byte-level differencing technology to update changes to files with minimal impact on network bandwidth while also ensuring that files are never overwritten, even if opened by other remote users. Other key features of WAFS include native file locking, replication to multiple locations simultaneously, adherence to access control list file permissions, and full UTF-8 support.

We will continue to offer WAFS as a stand-alone product and provide M&S services to customers who purchased WAFS in the past and who purchase it in the future. We do not expect to expend significant resources in the future expanding the features and capabilities of WAFS.

Table of Contents

File Transfer Solution for Consumers - CuteFTP

CuteFTP is our original product introduced in 1996. It is a file transfer program generally used by individuals and small businesses. It remains popular today and generates incremental revenue for us at a relatively low cost.

CuteFTP continues to have significant brand recognition in the market. Our current CuteFTP Version 9 introduced several notable new features including:

·	Support for Unicode (UTF-8) characters that allows greater international use.

·	Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) support to facilitate collaboration between users in editing and managing documents and files stored on World Wide Web servers.

Version 9 simplified our CuteFTP product line by consolidating all the features of our previous multi-product CuteFTP product line for Windows operating systems into this single version. We continue to offer CuteFTP Version 3.1 software for Mac platforms. We believe current versions of CuteFTP appeal to users wanting features more robust than offered in free alternatives such that it will be a product competitive in the marketplace for the foreseeable future.

We will continue selling CuteFTP as a stand-alone product and providing M&S services to customers who purchased CuteFTP in the past and who purchase it in the future. We do not expect to expend significant resources in the future expanding the features and capabilities of CuteFTP.

Professional Services

We offer a range of professional services to complement our on-premises and SaaS solutions. These professional services include product configuration and system integration, solution “quickstart” implementations, business process and workflow, policy development, education and training, and solution health checks. In addition, we may provide longer-term engineering services, including supporting multi-year contracts, if necessary, to support certain solution implementations and integrations.

Maintenance and Support

We offer M&S contracts to licensees of all of our software products. These M&S contracts entitle the licensee to software upgrades and technical support services in accordance with the terms of our M&S contract. Standard technical support services are provided via email and telephone during our regular business hours. For certain of our products, we offer a Platinum M&S contract which provides access to emergency technical assistance 24 hours per day, 7 days a week.

Most of our M&S contracts are for one year although we also sell multi-year contracts. M&S is purchased by substantially all buyers of our EFT platform as well as by many customers who purchase our other products. Customers with M&S pay us a recurring, annual amount that is typically 20% to 30% of the software license price. A majority of our customers with M&S contracts renew them each year.

Sales and Marketing

We emphasize developing our direct sales staff and reseller channel to capture sales through a high level of individual attention to the customer. We provide our sales staff and resellers with training and professional development opportunities to ensure they are capable of meeting the needs of our prospects and customers. These sales team development activities focus on technical and process-oriented topical areas to enhance their ability to identify prospects, best position our solutions and develop pipeline opportunities into sales.

We believe our reseller and distributor channel relationships allow us to leverage those third-party resources to increase our market penetration. We have established such relationships throughout the world and across industry lines. In particular, we are focused on growing our domestic reseller channel.

Table of Contents

Our marketing efforts focus on building brand awareness and capturing demand for our solutions. We take a two-pronged approach that includes a blend of digital and channel marketing. Through our digital marketing initiatives, we have invested heavily in content syndication programming, resulting in outbound targeted campaigns that more effectively reach the right audience with white papers, case studies and competitor comparisons. We also conduct ongoing search-engine optimization techniques and Pay Per Click advertising to enhance our ranking for particular key words in search results of major search engines. We continue to invest in channel marketing through programs designed to recruit and enable our target partners in a manner that creates joint initiatives that drive demand through them for our products. In addition, we are using our technology to meet the customer where they are shopping with placement in the Amazon Web Services and Azure marketplaces.

Our corporate website is www.globalscape.com . It provides a variety of sales and marketing information for our enterprise solutions as well as an ability to purchase some of our products online. We continually update the design of our websites to be responsive to the evolving marketplace and to provide a more solution-oriented perspective of our business, improve site navigation and provide additional opportunities for visitors to contact us through the websites.

Customers

We have sold our solutions throughout the world to individuals and enterprises ranging from SMBs to Fortune 100 companies. In order to leverage the resources of third parties, we make our products available for purchase by end users through third-party, channel resellers even though those end users can also purchase those products directly from us. During 2016 and 2015, we earned approximately 14% and 11%, respectively, of our revenue from such sales through our largest, third party, channel reseller. Although we believe that we are not substantially dependent on this distributor, if it were to experience a significant disruption of its business or if our relationship with them were to significantly deteriorate, it is possible that our ability to sell to end users would be, at least temporarily, negatively impacted. We believe that such termination would not have a material adverse effect on us because we have engaged, or believe that we would be able to engage, alternative distributors, resellers and other distribution channels to deliver our products to end-customers shortly following the termination of any agreement with any distributor.

We derive a significant portion of our revenue from risk averse and/or regulated commercial customers in North America and throughout the world. Our primary commercial vertical markets include finance, health care, energy, retail, manufacturing, and engineering. We also have a customer base in the local, state, and federal government spaces. We continue to pursue additional government business by leveraging our certifications and industry validations.

Seasonality

Our products are marketed to individuals, SMBs and large organizations. As a result of this mix within our customer base, we typically have not experienced significant seasonality in our sales other than a typical modest decline from time-to-time in first quarter sales as compared to sales in the preceding fourth quarter. We believe this sales profile is related to our continued growth as an enterprise solution provider operating in an environment where first quarter sales possibly slow as prospective customers begin to execute their business activities, including purchases of our solutions, in accordance with new-year budgets and plans.

Network and Equipment

We have contracted with various Tier 1 internet services providers. Our arrangements provide for redundancy in the event of a failure and for expansion of available bandwidth in the event there is a dramatic increase in demand. To protect critical customer data, our online shopping cart utilizes SSL encryption. We maintain technical and physical measures and procedures compliant with the PCI DSS. We use a certified Approved Scanning Vendor for security scans and PCI scan attestation.

Table of Contents

We have dedicated servers on and off site and expansion plans in place to allow rapid and cost effective scalability. Our offsite servers and data backup procedures provide a warm backup to our onsite servers for contingency purposes. The backups are performed in accordance with our disaster recovery plan.

Research and Development

The technology industry is characterized by rapid technological change in computer hardware, operating systems and software. Our customers’ requirements and preferences rapidly evolve, as do their expectations of the performance of our software. To keep pace with these changes, we maintain an ongoing program of new product development to remain competitive and to address demands in the marketplace for our products.

Our internal software engineers are responsible for creating and building our software products. They do so by combining their expertise with input from our sales, marketing and product management groups as to market trends and needs. Our software engineers design and write software and manage its testing and quality assurance. We utilize third-party software developers both domestically and overseas working under our supervision to supplement our software engineers. Using these external software developers in a strategic manner allows us to access highly-skilled labor pools, maintain a 24-hour development schedule, decrease time to market, and minimize programming costs.

All phases of research and development, or R&D, including scope approval, functional and implementation design, object modeling and programming, are subject to extensive internal quality assurance testing. We maintain an ongoing focus on improving our quality assurance testing infrastructure and practices. Technical reporting and customer support feedback from customers confirm the continuing positive effect of our ongoing enhancement of research and development and quality assurance processes.

Our R&D expenditures profile has been as follows ($ in thousands):

	Year ending December 31,
	2016		2015
R&D expenditures capitalized	$	1,538	$	1,967
R&D expenditures expensed		2,571		2,571
Total R&D expenditures	$	4,109	$	4,538

Total resources expended for R&D set forth above as total R&D expenditures serves to illustrate our total corporate efforts to improve our existing products and to develop new products regardless of whether our expenditures for those efforts were expensed or capitalized. Total resources expended for R&D is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered a substitute for R&D expense (set forth above as R&D expenditures expensed) and capitalized software development costs (set forth above as R&D expenditures capitalized) individually. While we believe the non-GAAP, total resources expended for R&D amount provides useful supplemental information regarding our overall corporate product improvement and new product creation activities, there are limitations associated with the use of this non-GAAP measurement. Total resources expended for R&D is a non-GAAP measurement not prepared in accordance with GAAP and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies since there is no standard for preparing this non-GAAP measurement. As a result, this non-GAAP measurement of total resources expended for R&D has limitations and should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, R&D expense and capitalized software development costs individually.

Substantially all of our R&D expenditures relate to our EFT platform products with a relatively minor level of these expenditures being related to our other products. We expect to increase our research and development activities in future years as we focus on improving our current products and introduce new products.

Competition

The managed file transfer software market sector is highly competitive, subject to rapid change, and significantly affected by new product introductions and other activities of market participants.

Table of Contents

The software industry has limited barriers to entry. The availability of computing power with continually expanding performance at progressively lower prices contributes to the ease of market entry. The software market is characterized by vigorous competition in each of the vertical markets in which we compete both from existing competitors and by entry of new competitors with innovative technologies. Competition is increasingly enhanced by consolidation of companies with complementary products and technologies and the possibility that competitors in one vertical segment may enter other vertical segments that we serve. In addition, some of our competitors in certain markets have greater financial, technical, sales, marketing and other resources than we do. Because of these and other factors, competitive conditions in these industries are likely to continue to intensify in the future. Increased competition could result in price reductions, reduced net revenue and profit margins and loss of market share, any of which could harm our business. See “Risk Factors – Risks Related to Our Operations” for further discussion of risks regarding competition.

We believe that our future results depend largely upon our ability to better serve customers by offering new products whether by internal development or acquisition. We also believe we must continue to provide existing product offerings that compete favorably with respect to ease of use, reliability, performance, range of useful features, continuing product enhancements, reputation, price and training.

There is limited information regarding the market shares of our solutions in their respective categories. Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial, technical, sales, marketing, personnel, and other resources, as well as greater name recognition and a larger customer base than we do. Significant competition characterizes the markets for our traditional MFT products. We anticipate we will continue to face increasing pricing pressures from competitors in the future. Given that there are low barriers to entry into the software market and that the market is subject to rapid technological change, we believe that competition will persist and intensify in the future. For more discussion on the risks associated with our competition, see “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Operations”.

EFT Small Business (EFT SMB) Edition. EFT SMB Edition competes against a number of secure, Windows-based FTP servers. We believe our primary competitors are products sold by Ipswitch, Serv-U, and JSCAPE. EFT SMB Edition has the advantage of leveraging the success of CuteFTP through product integration, offering proprietary extensions to the FTP protocol, and cross-marketing efforts to an existing customer base. EFT SMB Edition also benefits from being part of our EFT platform, which includes supplementary modules, including the DMZ Gateway solution, and an upgrade path to EFT Enterprise Edition.

EFT Enterprise Edition. EFT Enterprise Edition competes in the managed file transfer market. We believe our primary competitors are Axway, Ipswitch, IBM, and Linoma. EFT Enterprise Edition has the advantage of being cost effective in its market and allowing customers to flexibly evolve their MFT implementation by procuring supplementary modules such as our DMZ Gateway and Advanced Workflow Engine solutions.

CuteFTP. CuteFTP exists in a highly competitive environment with numerous FTP software utilities available on the Internet for both the personal and professional user. CuteFTP is positioned as one of the only secure FTP client programs that support a wide range of security standards related to the FTP protocol. We believe our primary competitors are consumer file transfer solutions sold by Ipswitch, Serv-U and Van Dyke Software, Inc. CuteFTP was an early Windows-based FTP client to market and historically has been among the most frequently downloaded FTP clients on popular download sites.

WAFS. WAFS competes in the wide area file services/storage market. We believe our primary competitors are Panzura and Peer Sync, each of which is delivering proprietary appliances. We believe that WAFS has the advantage of being a software-only solution which leverages corporate infrastructure and minimizes the total cost of ownership.

Mail Express. Mail Express competes in areas of the file transfer market associated with e-mail attachment offloading. We believe our primary competitors are Leapfile, Zix, and Biscom. Mail Express has the advantage of centralized policies for outbound file attachments and a transparent end-user experience, which allows for rapid customer deployments. Mail Express also has the benefit of integration with our most recent EFT release which provides customers with a more uniform administration experience for e-mail attachment offloading and traditional MFT operations.

Cloud-based Solutions for Secure Information Exchange. Our EFT Cloud solutions compete with MFT SaaS solutions. We believe our primary competitors are Ipswitch, IBM and Accellion. EFT Cloud has the advantage of leveraging cost effective, secure hosting and cloud infrastructures, as well as management services provided by GlobalSCAPE experts.

Table of Contents

Governmental Regulation

Export Control Regulations. All of our products are subject to U.S. export control laws and applicable foreign government import, export and/or use requirements. The level of control generally depends on the nature of the goods and services in question. For example, the level of control is impacted by the nature of the software and encryption incorporated into our products. Where controls apply, the export of our products may require an export license or authorization or that the transaction qualifies for a license exception or the equivalent, and may also be subject to corresponding reporting requirements. For the export of some of our products, we may be subject to various post-shipment reporting requirements. Minimal U.S. export restrictions apply to all of our products, whether or not they perform encryption functions. Additionally, because we are a Department of Defense contractor, there are certain registration requirements that may be triggered by our sales. In addition, certain of our items and/or transactions may be subject to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) if our software or services are specifically designed or modified for defense purposes. Companies engaged in manufacturing or exporting ITAR-controlled goods and services (even if these companies do not export such items) are required to register with the U.S. State Department.

Enhancements to existing products may, and new products will, be subject to review under the Export Administration Act to determine what export classification they will receive. In light of the ongoing discussions regarding anti-terrorism legislation in the U.S. Congress, there continues to be discussions regarding the correct level of export control. Export regulations may be modified at any time. Modifications to the export regulations could reduce or eliminate our ability to export some or all of our products from the U.S. without a license in the future, which could put us at a disadvantage in competing for international sales compared to companies located outside of the U.S. that would not be subject to these restrictions. Modifications to the export regulations could prevent us from exporting our existing and future products in an unrestricted manner without a license or make it more difficult to receive the desired classification. If export regulations were to be modified in such a way, we may be put at a competitive disadvantage with respect to selling our products internationally. We are working on enhancing our systems to address the impact of these regulations on our products and services and understand the need to comply. We will complete technical reviews on any new products that we acquire or develop that may be subject to these regulations before we can export them.

Privacy Laws. As our business evolves to incorporate more cloud and SaaS solutions, we will receive, transmit, and store a greater volume and diversity of information. As a result, we may be subject to various federal and State regulations regarding the protection of personally identifying information. Applicable laws may include, without limitation, federal laws such as the GLBA and HIPAA, as well as state laws, U.S. and state regulations, and international laws and regulations including the European Union Data Privacy Directive. In the event our systems are compromised by an unauthorized party, many of these privacy laws require that we provide notices to our customers whose personally identifiable data we reasonably believe may have been compromised. To mitigate the risk of compromised information, we use encryption and other security to protect our databases.

Intellectual Property

We regard some of the features of our internal operations, our software, our brands and marketing message, and our documentation as proprietary and rely on copyright, patent, and trademark and service mark laws and trade secret protection, such as confidentiality procedures, contractual arrangements, non-disclosure agreements and other measures to protect our proprietary information. Our intellectual property is an important and valuable asset that enables us to gain recognition for our products, services, and technology and enhance our competitive position and market value.

As part of our confidentiality procedures, we enter into non-disclosure agreements with our employees and independent contractors, resellers, and corporate partners. We enter into license or subscription services agreements with respect to our software, documentation, and other proprietary information. Our standard license agreements are transferable only in limited circumstances and have a perpetual term. Our subscription services agreements for our hosted and managed solutions restrict access and have a definite term. We also educate our employees on trade secret protection and employ measures to protect our facilities, equipment, and networks.

Our trademarks and copyrights are central to our business. We have the following trademarks in the United States:

·	GlobalSCAPE®, CuteFTP®, CuteFTP Pro®, CuteBackup®, DMZ Gateway®, EFT Cloud Services ®, GlobalSCAPE Securely Connected®, CuteSendIt® and Mail Express® are registered trademarks of GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

Table of Contents

Secure FTP Server™, Wide Area File Services™, WAFS™, CDP™, Advanced Workflow Engine™, AWE™, EFT Server™, EFT Workspaces™, Enhanced File Transfer™, Enhanced File Transfer Server™, Secure Ad Hoc Transfer™, SAT™, EFT Server Enterprise™, Enhanced File Transfer Server Enterprise ™, Desktop Transfer Client™, DTC™, Mobile Transfer Client™, MTC™, Web Transfer Client™, Workspaces™, Accelerate™, WTC™, Content Integrity Control™, Advanced Authentication™ and scConnect™ are trademarks of GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

·	TappIn® and design are registered trademarks of TappIn, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary.

·	TappIn Secure Share ™, Social Share ™, Now Playing ™, and Enhanced A La Carte Playlist™, are trademarks of TappIn, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary.

In addition to the United States trademarks listed above, we have trademarks registered in Canada and the European Union for GlobalSCAPE. We have obtained United States copyright registrations for all but the most recent versions of our software applications. We have two patents in the United States.

Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Policing unauthorized use of our products, which are licensed by the thousands and sold world-wide, is difficult. While we are unable to determine the extent to which piracy of our software products exists, software piracy is a persistent problem. In selling our products, we rely primarily on click-wrap licenses which are not signed in writing by licensees and may be unenforceable under the laws of certain jurisdictions. The laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the laws of the United States. Companies in the software industry, and other patent and trademark holders seeking to profit from royalties in connection with grants of licenses, own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, and trade secrets and frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. We have received, and may receive in the future, communications from third parties asserting that our products infringe, or may infringe, the proprietary rights of third parties, seeking damages resulting from such infringement or indicating that we may be required to obtain a license or royalty from such third parties. For more discussion on the risks associated with our intellectual property, you should read the information under “Risk Factors,” especially “Risks Related to Intellectual Property.”

Employees

Our number of employees is as follows:

	March 1,
Department	2017		2016
Sales and Marketing		47		46
Engineering		33		25
Professional Services		14		14
Customer Support		20		22
Management and Administration		19		19
Total		133		126

None of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. We believe our employee relations are good.

Available Information

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may read and copy any document we file with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the public reference room. The SEC maintains an internet web site that contains annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information that issuers (including GlobalSCAPE) file electronically with the SEC. The SEC’s web site is www.sec.gov. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and other reports and amendments filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission are available free of charge on our web site at www.globalscape.com in the Investor Relations section as soon as practicable after such reports are filed. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this report or any other filing that we make with the SEC.

Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We have described below risks we are aware of that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial results of operations and financial condition and the value of our stock owned by our stockholders.

Risks Related to Our Operations

If we are unable to generate significant volumes of sales leads from our various marketing and demand generation efforts then our revenue may not grow as expected or may decline.

We generate leads through various marketing activities such as targeted email campaigns, attending networking-based trade shows, purchasing information and services from third-party experts in generating leads, and hosting webinars on enterprise IT management issues. Our marketing efforts may be unsuccessful resulting in fewer sales leads. If we fail to generate a sufficient volume of leads from these activities and/or such sales leads do not result in actual sales, our revenue may not grow as expected or could decrease and our operating results could suffer.

Some of our sales leads are generated through visits to our websites by potential end-users interested in purchasing or downloading evaluations of our products. Many of these potential end-users find our websites by searching for secure file transfer products through Internet search engines, such as Google. A critical factor in attracting potential customers to our websites is how prominently our websites are displayed in response to search inquiries. If we are listed less prominently or fail to appear in search result listings for any reason, visits to our websites by customers and potential customers could decline significantly. We may not be able to replace this traffic, and, if we attempt to replace this traffic, we may be required to increase our sales and marketing expenses, which may not be offset by additional revenue and could adversely affect our operating results.

We rely heavily on third-party services providers to help us identify sales leads. If those service providers become unavailable to us, or if the cost of their services become more costly than we could afford to pay, our ability to generate a sufficient volume of sales leads could be compromised, and our ability to sustain or increase our revenue could be adversely affected.

A significant portion of our revenue is generated through maintenance and support services. Decreases in maintenance and support sales or renewal rates, or a decrease in the number of new licenses we sell, will negatively impact our future revenue and financial results.

Revenue from maintenance and support services, or M&S, we provide our customers comprised 57% and 54% of our total revenue in 2016 and 2015, respectively. We earn M&S revenue from new M&S contracts, typically sold with new software licenses, and from renewals of such contracts. Any reduction in the number of new software licenses that we sell, or a reduction in sales of associated initial M&S contracts, therefore may have a long-term negative impact on our future M&S revenue, even if our customers continue to renew M&S contracts at historical rates. This situation, in turn, would impact our business and harm our financial results.

Our customers have no obligation to purchase M&S with their initial software license or renew their M&S contract after the expiration of their initial M&S period, which is typically one year, but may also be for two or three years. Our customers’ purchases of M&S, and our renewal rates, may decline or fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including the overall global economy, the health of their businesses, and the perceived value of the M&S program. If our customers do not purchase M&S with their initial software license or do not renew their M&S contract for our products, our M&S revenue will decline and our financial results will suffer. In addition, customers are generally entitled to reduced annual maintenance fees for entering into long-term maintenance contracts, i.e. those contracts with a term longer than one year. Declines in our license bookings, increases in the proportion of long-term maintenance contracts and/or increased discounting could lead to declines in our M&S revenue growth rates. Should customers migrate away from systems and applications which our products support, utilize alternatives to our products, including solutions offering free maintenance, or become dissatisfied with our maintenance services, increased cancellations could lead to declines in our maintenance revenue.

Table of Contents

Our sales cycles can be long and unpredictable, and our sales efforts require considerable time and expense. As a result, our sales and revenue are difficult to predict and may vary substantially from period to period, which may cause our results of operations to fluctuate significantly.

Our results of operations may fluctuate, in part, because of the resource intensive nature of our sales efforts, the length and variability of our sales cycle, and the short-term difficulty in adjusting our operating expenses. Our results of operations depend in part on sales to large organizations. The length of our sales cycle, from proof of concept to delivery of and payment for our products, is typically three to nine months but can be more than a year. If our competitors offer or develop products that our prospective customers may want to compare to our products, that situation could cause our average sales cycle to become longer. Because the length of time required to close a sale varies substantially from customer to customer, it is difficult to accurately predict when, or even if, we will make a sale to a potential customer. As a result, large individual sales have, in some cases, occurred in periods subsequent to those periods in which we anticipated they would occur or have not occurred at all. The loss or delay of one or more large transactions in a period could impact our results of operations for that period and any future periods for which revenue from that transaction is delayed. As a result of these factors, it is difficult for us to forecast accurately our revenue for any particular period in the future. Because a substantial portion of our expenses are relatively fixed in the short term, our results of operations will suffer if our revenue falls below expectations in a particular period, which could cause the price of our common stock to decline.

Our business and growth depend on our ability to obtain M&S renewals from existing customers. A decline in the percent of our M&S contracts that are renewed could adversely affect our future operating results.

A substantial portion of our quarterly M&S revenue is attributable to M&S agreements entered into during previous periods. As a result, if there is a decline in the renewal rate of M&S agreements in any particular period, it is possible that only a small portion of the decline will be reflected in our M&S revenue recognized in that period and the remainder will be reflected in our M&S revenue recognized in subsequent periods. Our customers’ renewal rates may decline or fluctuate as a result of a number of factors including customer dissatisfaction with our products’ functionality, features or performance, the level and quality of our M&S services, or our pricing. Renewal rates may also change due to competitors’ product offerings, customers converting to in-house developed solutions, customers’ inability to continue their operations and spending levels, migration path issues for new versions of our products, and other factors, a number of which are beyond our control. Our customers have no obligation to renew their M&S after the expiration of the initial term, and they may elect not to renew their M&S or to reduce the product quantity covered under their M&S agreements, thereby potentially reducing our future revenue. A decline in the renewal rate of M&S agreements may also result in a decrease in deferred revenue on our balance sheet as of the end of the period in which the decline in renewals occurred which, in turn, could result in a decrease in our future revenue. For more information, see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.

We earn most of our revenue and operating margins from our Enhanced File Transfer licensed software solution suite and related maintenance and support services and, as a result, are highly dependent upon the continued success of this product line.

Our Enhanced File Transfer product platform, or EFT platform, is our on-premises, MFT solutions targeted primarily to the enterprise and small and medium business user environments. Our customers may purchase EFT as an on-premise license or may subscribe to it as software-as-a-service (or SaaS). License (both on-premise and SaaS), M&S, and professional services revenue from this product line was responsible for 93% and 90% of our total revenue in 2016 and 2015, respectively. This product has provided substantially all of our recent revenue growth and most of the operating margin necessary to fund our operations including, most notably, our sales and marketing and research and development activities. Declines and variability in demand for our EFT products could occur as a result of:

•	Improved products or product versions being offered by competitors in our markets.

•	Competitive pricing pressures.

•	Failure to release new or enhanced versions of the EFT solution on a timely basis or at all.

•	Technological change that we are unable to address with file transfer products or that changes the way enterprises utilize our products.

•	General economic conditions.

Table of Contents

Due to our product concentration, our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows would be adversely affected by a decline in demand for the EFT solution suite.

We may acquire new products, capabilities or entire business enterprises in the future that could give rise to risks and challenges that could adversely affect our future financial results.

Acquisitions of new products, capabilities or entire business enterprises involve a number of risks and challenges, including:

·	Complexity, time, and costs associated with integration of the acquired business operations, workforce, products, and technologies into our existing business, sales force, employee base, product lines, marketing and technology which ultimately may not be successful.

·	Diversion of management time and attention from our existing business and other business opportunities throughout the integration.

·	Potential loss or termination of employees, including costs associated with the termination or replacement of those employees.

·	Assumption of debt or other liabilities of the acquired business, including any future litigation related to alleged liabilities of the acquired business.

·	The incurrence of additional acquisition-related debt as well as increased expenses and working capital requirements.

·	Potential dilution of earnings per share.

·	Increased costs and efforts in connection with compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

·	Potentially substantial accounting charges for restructuring and related expenses, write-off of in-process research and development, impairment of goodwill, amortization of intangible assets, and share-based compensation expense.

The ongoing integration of any acquired products, capabilities or entire business enterprises involves continually determining and leveraging the actual market synergies, sustaining and even extending the business performance of the acquired entity, implementing our technology systems in the acquired operations, and integrating and managing the personnel related to the acquired products and/or operations. We also must continue to effectively integrate the different cultures of acquired business organizations into our own culture in a way that aligns various interests.

Any of the foregoing, and other factors, could harm our ability to achieve anticipated levels of financial performance or to realize other anticipated benefits of an acquisition. In addition, because acquisitions of technology-based products and companies are inherently risky, no assurance can be given that our previous, current, or future acquisitions will be successful and will not adversely affect our business, operating results, or financial condition.

Our ability to sell our products is highly dependent on the quality of our support and services offerings. Our failure to offer high-quality support and services could have a material and adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Once our products are deployed for use by our end customers, our end customers may depend on our support organization and our channel partners to resolve issues relating to our products. High-quality support is critical for the successful marketing and sale of our products. If we or our channel partners do not assist our end customers in deploying our products effectively, succeed in helping our customers resolve post-deployment issues quickly, or provide ongoing support, it could adversely affect our ability to sell our products to existing end customers and could harm our reputation with other potential end customers. As we expand our operations internationally, our support organization will face additional challenges, including those associated with delivering support, training and documentation in languages other than English. Our failure or the failure of our channel partners to maintain high-quality support and services could have a material and adverse effect on our business and operating results.

Table of Contents

If we fail to manage our sales and distribution channels effectively, our operating results could be adversely affected.

We sell our software products both directly to end-users and through a network of distributors and resellers that we collectively refer to as the channel and through marketplaces such as Amazon Web Services and Microsoft AZURE. Sales through these different channels involve distinct risks. Risks associated with direct sales include:

·	Challenges in scaling the size of the direct sales team to levels required for revenue growth.

·	Difficulty in hiring, retaining, and motivating our direct sales force.

·	Substantial amounts of training for sales representatives to become productive, including regular updates to cover new and revised products.

Leads obtained from paid advertising (for example, Google ads) impacting direct sales should the marketing and advertising effectiveness decline due to non-attributable declines in leads, unforeseen search engine algorithm changes, or other occurrences that may adversely impact the lead generation aspects of the direct sales cycle. Increased competition may materially impact the costs associated with such marketing and advertising.

From time-to-time, we make significant changes in the organizational structure and compensation plans of our sales organization, which may increase the risk of sales personnel turnover. To the extent that we experience turnover within our direct sales force or sales management, there is a risk that the productivity of our sales force would be negatively impacted which could lead to revenue declines. Turnover within our sales force can cause disruption in sales cycles leading to delay or loss of business. It can take time to implement new sales management plans and to effectively recruit and train new sales representatives. We review and modify our compensation plans for the sales organization periodically. Changes to our sales compensation plans could make it difficult for us to attract and retain top sales talent.

Sales through third-party distributors and resellers involve a number of risks, including:

•

Our lack of control over the timing of delivery of our products to end-users;

•

Our resellers and distributors currently not being subject to minimum sales requirements or any obligation to market our products to their customers;

•

Our reseller and distributor agreements generally being nonexclusive and terminable at any time without cause; and

•

Our resellers and distributors frequently marketing and distributing competing products and, from time to time, placing greater emphasis on the sale of these products due to pricing, promotions, and other terms offered by our competitors.

For 2016 and 2015, approximately 37% and 34%, respectively, of our revenue was derived from indirect channel sales through distributors and resellers. We expect that a significant portion of our revenue will continue to be derived from indirect channel sales in the future. Our ability to effectively distribute our products through those channels depends in part upon the financial and business condition of our distributor and reseller network. Computer software distributors and resellers typically are not highly capitalized, have previously experienced difficulties during times of economic contraction, and have experienced difficulties during the past several years. If our distributors and resellers were not be able to sustain their business at a level necessary to sell our products or provide customer support services, our business and revenue could be negatively impacted.

We rely upon major distributors and resellers in both the U.S. and international regions. Our largest distributor accounted for 14% and 11% of our total revenues in 2016 and 2015, respectively. Although we believe that we are not substantially dependent on this distributor, if it were to experience a significant disruption with its business or if our relationship with it were to significantly deteriorate, it is possible that our ability to sell to end users would be, at least temporarily, negatively impacted. This could, in turn, negatively impact our financial results.

Table of Contents

Over time, we have modified and will continue to modify aspects of our relationship with our distributors and resellers, such as their incentive programs, pricing to them and our distribution model, to motivate and reward them for aligning their businesses with our strategy and business objectives. Changes in these relationships and underlying programs could negatively impact their business and/or harm our business. In addition, the loss of or a significant reduction in business with those distributors or resellers or the failure to achieve anticipated levels of sell-through with any one of our major international distributors or large resellers could harm our business. In particular, if one or more of such distributors or resellers were unable to meet their obligations with respect to our accounts receivable from them, we could be forced to write off such accounts receivables and may be required to delay the recognition of revenue on future sales to these customers. These events could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

If we are unable to develop, offer and deliver new and enhanced products and services that achieve widespread market acceptance, or if we are unable to continually improve the performance, features, and reliability of our existing products and services, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

Rapid technological changes, as well as changes in customer requirements and preferences, characterize the software industry. Just as the transition from mainframes to personal computers transformed the industry, we believe our industry will continue to transform in response to continued adoption of mobile devices and cloud-based SaaS, growth of big data, and potential emergence of capabilities resulting from disruptive innovation. In response, we have devoted significant resources to the development of new solutions, such as our SaaS solutions. We are making such investments through our internal efforts, including further development and enhancement of our existing products, as well as through potential acquisitions of new product lines. Innovation, new product development or acquisition, and go-to-market activities involve a significant commitment of time and resources and are subject to a number of risks and challenges including:

•	Developing, sustaining, and appropriately leveraging market intelligence to identify areas of market need that offer potentially high return on investment for solution development.

•	Managing the length of the development cycle for new products and product enhancements which may be longer than originally expected.

•	Adapting to emerging and evolving industry standards and to technological developments by our competitors and customers.

•	Addressing the evolution of operating systems and industry platforms that presently may not be served by our existing products.

•	Entering into new or unproven markets with which we have limited experience.

•	Managing new product and service strategies, including integrating our various security and file replication technologies, management solutions, customer service, and support into unified enterprise security and file replication solutions.

•	Incorporating acquired products and technologies acquired through mergers, acquisitions or other relationships with third-parties.

•	Developing or expanding efficient sales channels.

•	Obtaining sufficient licenses to technology and technical access from operating system software vendors on reasonable terms to enable the development and deployment of interoperable products, including source code licenses for certain products with deep technical integration into operating systems.

•	Changing purchasing trends such as purchasing through on-line marketplaces such as Amazon Web Services and Microsoft AZURE rather than direct sales or traditional channels.

Investments in new products may not result in sufficient revenue generation to justify their costs or may cause short or long-term harm to our financial results. For example, customer adoption of our SaaS products may not occur as rapidly as anticipated, or competitors may introduce new products and services that achieve acceptance among our current customers thereby adversely affecting our competitive position, or we may not be successful in future attempts to achieve disruptive innovation.

Table of Contents

Our executive management team must act quickly, continuously and with vision due to the rapid speed of changing customer expectations and advancement of technology inherent in the software industry, the extensive and complex efforts required to create useful and widely accepted products, the rapid evolution of cloud computing, mobile devices, and new computing platforms, and the creation of other new technologies. Although we have adopted a strategy that we believe will fulfill these challenges, if we fail to execute properly on that strategy, adapt that strategy as market conditions evolve, or internalize and execute on that strategy, we may fail to meet our customers’ expectations, fail to compete with our competitors’ products and technology, and lose the confidence of our channel partners and employees. Such circumstances could adversely affect our business and financial performance.

Revenue from our Mail Express, Wide Area File Services, CuteFTP and TappIn product lines will likely decline in the future and become a smaller part of our total revenue.

Revenue from our products and services other than our EFT solution was $2.2 million and $3.0 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively, and accounted for 7% and 10% of our total revenue in 2016 and 2015, respectively. As we increase our focus and emphasis on our EFT platform products, our revenue from these products will likely continue to decline. We incur costs and expenses supporting these products for our customers who are currently using them. If revenue from these products continues to decline, we may begin to incur losses from these products. The potential for such losses may cause us to decide to sell or discontinue one or more of these product lines. If we cannot effectively reduce our costs to support these products, or if see decide to sell one or more of these product lines but cannot find a buyer for them, we may begin incurring losses on these products that could materially affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We may engage third parties to develop products on our behalf. These engagements may involve reliance on resources owned and managed by those third parties over which we have no direct control.

In addition to research and development of new products by our employees, we engage third parties from time-to-time to conceive, design and develop products on our behalf. Arrangements of this type involve high levels of risk due to inherent uncertainties about the timely delivery and ultimate viability of those products due to the reliance we must place on third parties to plan, perform and successfully complete work for us. These are processes for which we could have notably less direct control than if we performed the work ourselves. These arrangements involve our reliance on the ongoing financial viability of the enterprise performing the work. This risk is challenging to manage because we do not always have clear visibility as to the overall condition of the third-party enterprise. These risks could result in the product not being successfully completed within the expected timeframe, or at all. If actual results from these type of endeavors that we may undertake in the future differ materially from original and ongoing expectations, our business, operating results and financial position could be harmed.

Our ability to develop our software will be seriously impaired if we are not able to use our foreign subcontractors.

We rely on foreign subcontractors to help us develop some aspects of some of our software. If these programmers decided to stop working for us, or if we were unable to continue using them because of political or economic instability, we would have difficulty finding comparably skilled developers in a timely manner. In addition, we would likely have to pay considerably more for the same work, especially if we used U.S. personnel. If we could not replace the contract programmers, it could take us longer to develop certain products and product upgrades and at a higher cost.

Seasonality may cause fluctuations in our revenue.

We believe there could be notable seasonal factors in the future that may cause us to record higher revenue in some quarters compared with others. We believe this variability is possible largely due to our customers’ budgetary and spending patterns, as many customers spend the unused portions of their discretionary budgets prior to the end of their fiscal years. For example, we have historically recorded our highest level of revenue in our fourth quarter, which we believe corresponds to the fourth quarter of a majority of our customers. If our rate of growth slows over time, seasonal or cyclical variations in our operations may become more pronounced, and our business, results of operations and financial position may be adversely affected.

Table of Contents

Reliance on delivery of our products near or at the end of each quarter could cause our revenue for the applicable period to fall below expected levels.

As a result of customer buying patterns and the efforts of our sales force and channel partners to meet or exceed their sales objectives, we have historically received a substantial portion of orders from our customers and generated a substantial portion of revenue during the last few weeks of each period. A significant interruption in our IT systems, which manage critical functions such as order processing, trade compliance reviews, delivery of our products, billings, collections, revenue recognition, and financial reporting, among others, could result in delayed order fulfillment and decreased revenue for that period. If expected revenue at the end of any period is delayed for any reason, including the failure of anticipated purchase orders to materialize, our logistics or channel partners’ inability to deliver products prior to period-end to fulfill purchase orders received near the end of the period, our inability to release new products on schedule, any failure of our systems related to order review and processing, or any delays in product delivery based on trade compliance requirements, our revenue for that period could fall below our expectations and the estimates of market analysts, if any, which could adversely impact our business and results of operations and cause a decline in the trading price of our common stock.

The transition from an on-premise to a cloud-based, SaaS subscription business model is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties.

We believe that there will be a continuing shift away from sales of on-premise software licenses to sales of subscriptions for our cloud-based, SaaS solutions, which provide our customers the right to access certain of our software in a hosted environment for a specified subscription period. This SaaS strategy may give rise to a number of risks, including the following:

·	If customers are uncomfortable with cloud-based solutions and desire only perpetual licenses, we may experience longer than anticipated sales cycles and sales of our cloud-based solutions may lag behind our expectations;
·	Our cloud-based strategy may raise concerns among our customer base, including concerns regarding changes to pricing over time, service availability, information security of a cloud-based solution and access to files while offline or once a subscription has expired;
·	We may be unsuccessful in maintaining our target pricing, adoption and projected renewal rates;
·	We may select a target price that is not optimal and could negatively affect our sales or earnings; and
·	We may incur costs at a higher than forecasted rate as we expand our cloud-based solutions.

The shift of our customers’ preference to cloud-based, SaaS solutions may also require a considerable investment of technical, financial, legal and sales resources, and a scalable organization. Market acceptance of such offerings is affected by a variety of factors, including but not limited to: security, reliability, scalability, customization, performance, current license terms, customer preference, customer concerns with entrusting a third party to store and manage their data, public concerns regarding privacy and the enactment of restrictive laws or regulations. Whether our business model transition will prove successful and will accomplish our business and financial objectives is subject to numerous uncertainties, including but not limited to: customer demand, renewal rates, channel acceptance, our ability to further develop and scale infrastructure, our ability to include functionality and usability in such solutions that address customer requirements, tax and accounting implications, pricing and our costs. In addition, the metrics we use to gauge the status of our business may evolve over the course of the transition as significant trends emerge.

If we are unable to successfully establish our cloud-based solutions and navigate our business model transition in light of the foregoing risks and uncertainties, our results of operations could be negatively impacted.

Our subscription services, such as our EFT Cloud Services, may impact our revenue trends as some opportunities that otherwise would have materialized as software license sales for on-premises installation at our customers’ sites could potentially shift to subscription-based sales.

In recent years, most of our revenue, and the growth of our revenue, has been attributable to perpetual license and M&S sales of our EFT solution. Perpetual license fees for software to be installed at a customer site are typically recognized in full as revenue at the time the software is delivered to the customer. On the other hand, subscription services are recognized as revenue over time as the services are delivered (assuming collection is deemed probable), typically on a monthly basis. Any significant increase in the percentage of our business generated from such a subscription model could, as a result, delay revenue recognition and have a negative impact on our operating results.

Table of Contents

The impact of subscription services on prior revenue growth trends depends on several key factors, including the number of customers who may shift from on-premise software licenses to subscription services, the rate at which they may do so, the subscription term and fees, and the comparative value of the opportunity had it materialized as a software license sale instead of as a subscription service. Generally, for a fixed number of opportunities (that is, without considering the possibility that a new service offering may result in additional sales opportunities), the addition of subscription services reduces revenue growth rates for several quarters for the associated solutions until cumulative subscription revenue increases and, potentially, surpasses comparable software license revenue. The revenue impacts are particularly pronounced early in the introduction of subscription services because there has been only a short time period for accumulation of the recurring revenue stream. As we continue to promote subscription-based services, the risk of this revenue shift will continue with revenue derived from sales of our EFT solution, the comparable on-premises MFT software in our portfolio, most subject to ongoing transitory risk from the introduction of these subscription services.

Subscription offerings create risks related to the timing of revenue recognition.

Although the subscription model is designed to increase the number of customers who purchase our products and services and create a recurring revenue stream that is more predictable, it creates certain risks related to the timing of revenue recognition and potential reductions in cash flows.

A decline in new or renewed subscriptions in any period may not be immediately reflected in our reported financial results for that period but may result in a decline in our revenue in future periods. If we were to experience significant downturns in subscription sales and renewal rates, our reported financial results might not reflect such downturns until future periods. Our subscription model could also make it difficult for us to rapidly increase our revenues from subscription or SaaS-based services through additional sales in any period as revenue from new customers will be recognized over the applicable subscription term. Increases in sales under our subscription sales model could result in decreased revenues over the short term if they are offset by a decline in sales from perpetual license customers.

Our cloud and SaaS offerings bring additional business and operational risks.

We offer delivery of several of our products using a SaaS model. Our SaaS offerings provide our customers with existing and new software management through a cloud service as opposed to traditional on-premises software deployments. There can be no assurance that SaaS revenue will be significant in the future despite our levels of investment in developing this product delivery method. Margins associated with our SaaS offerings are generally lower than margins associated with our on-premises solutions.

Most of our SaaS subscription arrangements are under month-to-month agreements. Accordingly, our customers generally have no long-term obligation to us and may cancel their SaaS subscription at any time. Even if our customers are satisfied with our SaaS products and services, they may elect not to continue their SaaS subscription, and in fact, some customers elect not to do so. Renewal rates in the future may differ from historical trends such that we may not be able to accurately predict customer renewal rates. Our customers’ renewal rates may decline or fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including their level of satisfaction with our services and their ability to continue their operations and spending levels. If we experience a decline in the renewal rates for our customers or they opt for lower-priced editions of our offerings or fewer subscriptions, our operating results may be adversely impacted.

There is a risk that we could find it difficult or costly to support both traditional software installed by customers and software delivered as a service. To the extent that our SaaS offerings are defective or there are disruptions to our services, demand for our SaaS offerings could diminish, and we could be subject to substantial liability.

Interruptions or delays in service from our third party service delivery hosts could impair the delivery of our services and harm our business. If we or our third party service delivery hosts experience security breaches and unauthorized access is obtained to a customer’s data or our data, our services may be perceived as not being secure, customers may curtail or stop using our services, and we may incur significant legal and financial exposure and liabilities.

Our success with our SaaS solutions depends on organizations and customers perceiving technological and operational benefits and cost savings associated with the increasing adoption of virtual infrastructure solutions in lieu of on-premises data centers. Concerns about security, privacy, availability, data integrity, retention and ownership may negatively impact the rate of adoption of these solutions. SaaS software solutions can be complex, and the deployment of our secure file transfer solutions in the desired manner may require additional professional services and implementation services for which we may not have the ability to provide at an appropriate margin. Our SaaS products are dependent upon third party hardware, software and hosting vendors, all of which must interoperate for end users to achieve their computing goals. We expect other companies to enter this market and to introduce their own initiatives that may compete with, or not be compatible with, our cloud solutions.

Table of Contents

If any of these events were to occur, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

We rely on third parties to provide us with a number of operational services, including hosting and delivery of our SaaS products, certain of our customer support services, and other operations. Any interruption or delay in service from these third parties, breaches of security or privacy, or failures in data collection could expose us to liability, harm our reputation and adversely impact our financial performance.

We rely on hosted computer services from third parties for certain services that we provide our customers. As we gather customer data and host certain customer data in third-party facilities, a security breach could compromise the integrity or availability or result in the theft of customer data. In addition, our operations could be negatively affected in the event of a security breach, and we could be subject to the loss or theft of confidential or proprietary information.

Unauthorized access to this data may be obtained through break-ins, breach of our secure network by an unauthorized party, employee theft or misuse, or other misconduct. We rely on a number of third party suppliers in the operation of our business for the provisioning of various services and materials that we use in the production of our products. Although we seek to diversify our third party suppliers, we may from time to time rely on a single or limited number of suppliers, or upon suppliers in a single country, for these services or materials. The inability of such third parties to satisfy our requirements could disrupt our business operations or make it more difficult for us to implement our business strategy. If any of these situations were to occur, our reputation could be harmed, we could be subject to third party liability, including under data protection and privacy laws in certain jurisdictions, and our financial performance could be negatively impacted.

Fluctuations in professional services revenue may be greater than experienced in previous reporting periods and have a disproportionate impact on our financial results. For example, increased professional services sales, especially to the government, may result in lower earnings as a percentage of revenue.

Our solution portfolio includes software licenses, subscription services, M&S, and professional services. Because they are relatively labor intensive, professional services typically have substantially lower margins than software license sales, M&S and subscription services. Professional services were 8% and 7% of our total revenue in 2016 and 2015, respectively. However, this percentage can fluctuate significantly from period to period depending on the needs of our customers.

Depending on our mix of software licenses, subscription, M&S, and professional services revenue in a given reporting period, our earnings as a percentage of revenue may fluctuate from historical norms. For example, if we were to derive a relatively large (compared to historical norms) component of our revenue from professional services in a reporting period, earnings as a percentage of revenue may decline in that period due to lower margin contribution from those labor-intensive services as compared to software license, subscription, and M&S revenue.

An inability to establish vendor specific objective evidence of the selling price of one or more components of a software sale with multiple components could result in our having to change from recognizing software license revenue in full at the time the software is delivered to recognizing that same software license revenue ratably in the future over an extended number of accounting periods.

For software sales with multiple components (typically a sale involving both a license to software that will be delivered immediately and M&S or professional services that will be delivered over an extended period of time), GAAP requires that vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value be established for at least all but one of the components of that sale before the software license revenue can be recognized in full at the time of delivery to the customer. If VSOE of fair value cannot be established, recognition of the software license revenue must be deferred and recognized ratably in the future over an extended number of accounting periods, the length of which would typically be the time period covered by the related M&S or professional services contract. We currently have established VSOE of selling price in a manner that supports our recognizing software license revenue in full at the time we deliver the software to our customers for substantially all of our products.

Table of Contents

Situations can arise where a change in product pricing that improves our cash flow and financial position has an unintended consequence of our not being able to establish VSOE of fair value where it existed before. If that set of circumstances were to occur, we could be required by GAAP to defer recognition of software license revenue to future periods. That requirement could cause us to experience an immediate decline in software license revenue recognized in our financial statements in the period in which the licensed software was delivered to our customer even though the timing and amount of cash flow from the transaction would be the same as if we had established VSOE of fair value. If this collection of events were to occur, it could have a material, adverse effect on our revenue, results of operations and financial condition we present in our financial statements.

We may not be able to compete effectively with larger, better-positioned companies, resulting in lower margins and loss of market share.

We operate in intensely competitive markets that experience rapid technological developments, market consolidation, changes in industry standards, changes in customer requirements, and frequent new product introductions and product improvements by existing and new competitors. If we are unable to anticipate or react to these competitive challenges or if existing or new competitors take or gain additional market share in any of our markets, our competitive position could weaken, and we could experience a decrease in revenues that could adversely affect our business and operating results. To compete successfully, we must maintain a successful research and development effort to create new products and services and enhance existing products and services, effectively adapt to changes in the technology or product rights held by our competitors, appropriately respond to competitor strategies as such strategies become apparent, and effectively adapt to technological changes and changes in the ways that our information is accessed, used, and stored within our enterprise and consumer markets. If we are unsuccessful in responding to our competitors or to changing technological and customer demands, we could experience a negative effect on our competitive position and our financial results.

We compete with a variety of companies that have significantly greater revenues and financial resources, more partners, resellers and distribution channels than we have, and greater quantities of personnel and technical resources. For example, our EFT solution suite competes with products from IBM Sterling, Ipswitch, Axway and several other vendors. Our WAFS product competes with Riverbed Technology, Panzura, and Peer Sync. Large companies may be able to develop new technologies, across multiple solution spaces, and on more operating systems, more quickly than we can, to offer a broader array of products, and to respond more quickly to new opportunities, industry standards or customer requirements.

Additional competitors may enter the market and also may have significantly greater capabilities and resources than we do. Some existing competitors also may be able to adopt more aggressive pricing strategies. For example, Ipswitch provides an older version of its consumer file transfer protocol program for free for non-commercial use, and Microsoft includes file transfer protocol functionality in its Internet browser, which it also distributes for free. Increased competition may result in lower operating margins and loss of market share.

As we attempt to expand our business, our operating expenses may increase, and we may incur losses.

We intend to expand our business, specifically with regard to new on-premise license sales and SaaS delivery of our products. To do so, we plan to increase our research and development expenditures to accelerate our introduction of new features, functions and capabilities for our products to the marketplace. We intend to enhance the presence and visibility of those products by increasing our sales and marketing expenditures to expand our sales force, particularly through a broader reseller program involving more third-parties, and by implementing new sales lead generation and marketing initiatives.

These expanded research and development and sales and marketing activities may result in an increase in our operating expenses. If we do not successfully develop new features, functions and capabilities for our products in a manner that increases license sales of our products, and if our enhanced sales and marketing activities, including expansion of our third-party reseller programs, are not successful, our revenue may not increase. In that event, our net income could decline or we may incur losses.

As we develop new products or new features, functions and capabilities for existing products, we capitalize certain of our costs related to those activities and defer the expense arising from those activities to future periods.

In accordance with GAAP, we capitalize certain of our costs related to the development of new products or new features, functions and capabilities for existing products. We present these capitalized costs as an asset on our balance sheet. We amortize these costs to expense in future periods after these work products are completed and released for sale so as to match these expenses the associated revenue we earn in the future. If we were to deem these capitalized costs not to be realizable through future revenue and accordingly had to reduce the carrying value of these assets, possibly to zero, we could incur significant expenses earlier than anticipated.

Table of Contents

Our products are complex and operate in a wide variety of computer configurations, which could result in errors or product failures.

Addressing MFT, hosted services and secure content mobility typically requires very complex products. Undetected errors, failures, or bugs may occur, especially when products are first introduced or when new versions are released. Our products are often installed and used in large-scale computing environments with different operating systems, system management software, and equipment and networking configurations, which may cause errors or failures in our products or may expose undetected errors, failures, or bugs in our products. Our customers’ computing environments also are often characterized by a wide variety of standard and non-standard configurations that make pre-release testing for programming or compatibility errors very difficult and time-consuming. In addition, despite testing by us and others, errors, failures, or bugs may not be found in new products or releases until after commencement of commercial shipments. In the past, we have discovered software errors, failures, and bugs in certain of our product offerings after their introduction and have experienced delayed or lost revenues during the time required to correct these errors.

Errors, failures, or bugs in products released by us could result in negative publicity, product returns, loss of or delay in market acceptance of our products, loss of competitive position, or claims by customers or others. Many of our end-user customers use our products in applications that are critical to their businesses and may have a greater sensitivity to defects in our products than to defects in other, less critical, software products. In addition, if an actual or perceived breach of information integrity or availability occurs in one of our end-user customer’s systems, regardless of whether the breach is attributable to our products, the market perception of the effectiveness of our products could be harmed. Alleviating any of these problems could require significant expenditures of our capital and other resources and could cause interruptions, delays, or cessation of our product licensing, which could cause us to lose existing or potential customers and could adversely affect our operating results.

Our business is subject to the risks of warranty claims, product returns, product liability and product defects.

Real or perceived errors, failures or defects in our products could result in claims by customers for losses that they sustain. If customers make these types of claims, we may be required, or may choose, for customer relations or other reasons, to expend additional resources in order to help correct the problem. Liability provisions in our standard terms and conditions of sale, and those of our resellers and distributors, may not be enforceable under some circumstances or may not fully or effectively protect us from customer claims and related liabilities and costs, including indemnification obligations under our agreements with resellers and distributors. The sale and support of our products also entail the risk of product liability claims. We maintain insurance to protect against certain types of claims associated with the use of our products, but our insurance coverage may not adequately cover any such claims. Even claims that ultimately are unsuccessful could result in expenditures of funds in connection with litigation and divert management’s time and other resources.

Turmoil and uncertainty in U.S. and international economic markets could adversely affect our business and operating results.

Demand for our products depends in large part upon the level of capital and maintenance expenditures by many of our customers. Economic downturns could have an adverse effect on spending on information technology projects since in such environments, prospects and customers may reduce, sometimes greatly, their discretionary spending to focus on preserving mandatory spending budgets.

These adverse impacts to customer spending may be directly, and adversely, reflected in our future business and operating results because we believe a substantial part of their MFT spending budget is considered discretionary by our prospects and customers. The perception of MFT solutions spending as discretionary is further reinforced by the existence of low cost, or even free, products that deliver some subset of the capabilities found in our solutions. In the event of an economic downturn, some customers may decide to defer spending for our solutions or may elect to obtain low cost or free “good enough” products as an interim measure. The potential adverse impacts of such decisions may persist for an extended period of time, even well into a period of economic recovery, given that many prospects will not change their IT infrastructure for a considerable period of time after that infrastructure has been installed and is operating adequately.

Adverse financial results from another economic downturn and uncertainty could include flat, or even decreasing, sales, lower gross and net margins, and impairment of current or future goodwill and long-lived assets. In addition, some of our customers could delay paying their obligations to us. Potentially reduced sales and margins and customer payment problems could limit our ability to fund research and development, marketing, sales, and other activities necessary to sustain and expand our market position.

Table of Contents

In past economic downturns, we have sometimes experienced a decrease in our stock price. If investors have concerns that our business, financial condition and results of operations will be negatively impacted by another economic downturn, our stock price could decrease again.

Regardless of economic conditions, fluctuations in demand for our products and services are driven by many factors and a decrease in demand for our products could adversely affect our financial results.

We are subject to fluctuations in demand for our products and services due to a variety of factors, including competition, product obsolescence, technological change, budget constraints of our actual and potential customers, awareness of security threats to IT systems, and other factors. While such factors may, in some periods, increase product sales, fluctuations in demand can also negatively impact our product sales. If demand for our products declines, our revenues, as well as our gross and net margins, could be adversely affected.

Sales to the U.S. Government make up a portion of our business, and changes in government defense spending could have consequences on our financial position, results of operations and business.

Our revenues from the U.S. Government largely result from contracts awarded to us under various U.S. Government programs, primarily defense-related programs with the Department of Defense (“DoD”). The funding of our programs is subject to the overall U.S. Government foreign policy, budget and appropriation decisions, and processes which are driven by numerous factors, including geo-political events and macroeconomic conditions, and are beyond our control. Projected defense spending budgets are uncertain and difficult to predict.

Significant changes in defense spending could have long-term consequences for our size and structure. Changes in government priorities and requirements could impact the funding, or the timing of funding, of our programs which could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition. Government contracts typically have long sales cycles such that closure of such contracts is difficult to predict.

U.S. Government contracts generally also permit the government to terminate the contract, in whole or in part, without prior notice, at the government’s convenience or for default based on performance. A termination arising out of our default could expose us to liability and have a negative impact on our ability to obtain future contracts and orders. Furthermore, on contracts for which we are a subcontractor and not the prime contractor, the U.S. Government could terminate the prime contract for convenience or otherwise, irrespective of our performance as a subcontractor.

Because we are a DoD contractor, certain of our items and/or transactions may be subject to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (“ITAR”) if our software or services are specifically designed or modified for defense purposes. Companies engaged in manufacturing or exporting ITAR-controlled goods and services (even if these companies do not export such items) are required to register with the U.S. State Department. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in fines and sanctions which could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.

If we lose key personnel we may not be able to execute our business plan.

Our future success depends on the continued services of our employees. If employees leave, it can be difficult to replace them because of the intense competition in the marketplace for people with the skillsets we need to operate our business. New employees may not be productive for weeks or months as they learn about our solutions, our personnel and the administrative practices within our company.

It may be difficult for us to recruit and retain software developers and other technical and management personnel because we are a relatively small company.

We compete intensely with other software development and distribution companies domestically and internationally as well as information technology departments supporting larger businesses all of whom strive to recruit and hire employees from a limited pool of qualified personnel. Some qualified candidates prefer to work for larger, better known companies or in another geographic area. In order to attract and retain personnel in a competitive marketplace, we believe that we must provide a competitive compensation package, including cash, equity-based compensation, and other employee benefits including medical insurance and healthcare plans. The volatility in our stock price may from time to time adversely affect our ability to recruit or retain employees. In addition, we may be unable to obtain required stockholder approvals of future increases in the number of shares available for issuance under our equity compensation plans. Also, accounting rules require us to treat the issuance of employee stock options and other forms of equity-based compensation as compensation expense. As a result, we may decide to issue fewer equity-based incentives and may be impaired in our efforts to attract and retain necessary personnel. If we are unable to hire and retain qualified employees, or conversely, if we fail to manage employee performance or reduce staffing levels when required by market conditions, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

Table of Contents

Key personnel have left our company in the past. There likely will be additional departures of key personnel from time to time in the future. The loss of any key employee could result in significant disruptions to our operations, including adversely affecting the timeliness of product releases, the successful implementation and completion of company initiatives, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting, and the results of our operations. Hiring, training, and successfully integrating replacement sales, engineering, and other personnel could be time consuming, may cause additional disruptions to our operations, and may be unsuccessful, which could negatively impact future revenues.

Our operations potentially are vulnerable to security breaches that could harm the quality of our products and services or disrupt our ability to deliver our products and services.

Information security is a dynamic discipline that historically has faced threats that develop and emerge in ways that are sometimes unpredictable. Third parties may breach our systems and information security and damage our products and services or misappropriate confidential customer information. This might cause us to lose customers, or even cause customers to make claims against us for damages. We may be required to expend significant resources to protect against potential or actual security breaches and/or to address problems caused by such breaches.

Improper disclosure of personal data could result in liability and harm our reputation.

While we have derived the majority of our historical revenues from on-premises delivery of our products, we now also offer our products on third-party, hosted platforms. As we continue to execute our strategy of increasing the number and scale of our cloud-based offerings, we may store and process increasingly large amounts of personally identifiable information of our customers. At the same time, the continued occurrence of high-profile data breaches provides evidence of an external environment increasingly hostile to information security. This environment demands that we continuously improve our design and coordination of security controls. It is possible our security controls over personal data, our training of employees and vendors on data security, and other practices we follow may not prevent the improper disclosure of personally identifiable information. Improper disclosure of this information could harm our reputation, lead to legal exposure to customers, or subject us to liability under laws that protect personal data, resulting in increased costs or loss of revenue. We believe consumers using our subscription services increasingly will want efficient, centralized methods of choosing their privacy preferences and controlling their data. Perceptions that our products or services do not adequately protect the privacy of personal information could inhibit sales of our products or services and could constrain consumer and business adoption of cloud-based solutions.

Breaches of our cybersecurity systems could degrade our ability to conduct our business operations and deliver products and services to our customers, delay our ability to recognize revenue, compromise the integrity of our software products, result in significant data losses and the theft of our intellectual property, damage our reputation, expose us to liability to third parties and require us to incur significant additional costs to maintain the security of our networks and data.

We increasingly depend upon our IT systems to conduct virtually all of our business operations, ranging from our internal operations and product development activities to our marketing and sales efforts and communications with our customers and business partners. Cyber threats may attempt to penetrate our network security, or that of our website, and misappropriate our proprietary information or cause interruptions of our service. Because the techniques used by such attackers to access or sabotage networks change frequently and may not be recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques. In addition, sophisticated hardware and operating system software and applications that we produce or procure from third parties may contain defects in design or manufacture, including “bugs” and other problems that could unexpectedly interfere with the operation of the system. We have also outsourced a number of our business functions to third party contractors. Therefore, our business operations also depend, in part, on the success of our contractors’ own cybersecurity measures. Similarly, we rely upon distributors, resellers, system vendors and systems integrators to sell our products and our sales operations depend, in part, on the reliability of their cybersecurity measures. Additionally, we depend upon our employees to appropriately handle confidential data and deploy our IT resources in a safe and secure fashion that does not expose our network systems to security breaches and the loss of data. Accordingly, if our cybersecurity systems and those of our contractors fail to protect against unauthorized access, sophisticated cyber-attacks and the mishandling of data by our employees and contractors, our ability to conduct our business effectively could be damaged in a number of ways, including:

·	Sensitive data regarding our business, including intellectual property and other proprietary data, could be stolen.

·	Our electronic communications systems, including email and other methods, could be disrupted, and our ability to conduct our business operations could be seriously damaged until such systems can be restored.

Table of Contents

·	Our ability to process customer orders and electronically deliver products and services could be degraded, and our distribution channels could be disrupted, resulting in delays in revenue recognition.

·	Defects and security vulnerabilities could be introduced into our software products, thereby damaging the reputation and perceived reliability and security of our products and potentially making the data systems of our customers vulnerable to further data loss and cyber incidents.

·	Personally identifiable data of our customers, employees and business partners could be lost.

Should any of the above events occur, we could be subject to significant claims for liability from our customers or from regulatory actions of governmental agencies, our ability to protect our intellectual property rights could be compromised and our reputation and competitive position could be significantly harmed. Also, the regulatory and contractual actions, litigations, investigations, fines, penalties and liabilities relating to data breaches that result in losses of personally identifiable or credit card information of users of our services could be significant in terms of fines and reputational impact and necessitate changes to our business operations that may be disruptive to us. Additionally, we could incur significant costs in order to upgrade our cybersecurity systems and remediate damages. Consequently, our financial performance and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Certain components of the software code comprising some of our products are licensed from third parties making us dependent upon those licenses remaining in place for those products to operate in their current form.

Certain key components of the software code comprising certain of our products are licensed from unrelated, third parties. These licenses are not perpetual and, as such, with advance notice as provided in the license agreements, these third parties could terminate these licenses. Even with advance notice, termination of these licenses could create a severe hardship for us due to the need to locate substitute software code from other third parties or create alternative software code ourselves in order for our products to continue to operate in the manner designed or for us to keep pace with customer requirements, including our obligations under maintenance and support agreements. There is no assurance we could achieve either of those alternative solutions in a timely and effective manner that would not disrupt our ability to continue selling and supporting those products, or without the consumption of significant company resources in the form of time spent by our personnel creating alternative solutions or cash paid to third parties to assist us. Such a situation could delay the completion and introduction to the marketplace of other products we are developing to remain competitive due to the diversion of the attention of certain of our key personnel away from that work. If any of these events occur, our future business and financial results could be adversely affected.

We utilize “open source” software in some of our products.

The open source software community develops software technology for free use by anyone. We incorporate a limited amount of open source code software into our products. We may use more open source code software in the future.

Our use, in some instances, of open source code software may impose limitations on our ability to commercialize our solutions and may subject us to possible intellectual property litigation. Open source code may impose limitations on our ability to commercialize our products because, among other reasons, open source license terms may be ambiguous and may result in unanticipated obligations regarding our solution, and open source software cannot be protected under trade secret law. In addition, it may be difficult for us to accurately determine the identities of the developers of the open source code and whether the acquired software infringes third-party intellectual property rights. As a result, we could be subject to suits by parties claiming ownership of what we believe to be open source software. From time to time, companies that incorporate open source software into their products have been subject to such claims.

Claims of infringement or misappropriation against us could be costly for us to defend and could require us to re-engineer our solution or to seek to obtain licenses from third parties in order to continue offering our solution. We also might need to discontinue the sale of our solution in the event re-engineering could not be accomplished on a timely or cost-effective basis. If any such claim, attempted remediation, or solution discontinuance occur, our business and operating results could be harmed.

Our products may expose customers to invasion of privacy, causing customer dissatisfaction or possible claims against us for damages.

Our products and solutions are intended to facilitate data and information transfer and sharing, sometimes by providing outsiders access to a customer’s computer. Such access potentially may make the customer vulnerable to security breaches, which could result in the loss of the customer’s privacy or property. Invasions of privacy or other customer harm occurring in an environment where our solutions are operating could result in customer dissatisfaction and possible claims against us for any resulting damages.

Table of Contents

We are subject to governmental export and import controls that could subject us to liability or impair our ability to compete in international markets.

All products that are exported, re-exported or that are worked on by foreign nationals are subject to export controls. Such controls include prohibitions on end uses, end users and exports to certain sanctioned countries. In addition, incorporation of encryption technology into our products increases the level of U.S. export controls. We are subject to these requirements as certain of our products include the ability for the end user to encrypt data. Therefore, our products may be exported outside the United States or revealed to foreign nationals only by complying with the required level of export controls/restrictions. Restrictions applicable to our products may include a requirement to have a license to export the technology, a requirement to have software licenses approved before export is allowed, and outright bans on the licensing of certain encryption technology to particular end users or to all end users in a particular country. In addition, various countries regulate the import of certain technology and have enacted laws that could limit our ability to distribute our products or could limit our customers’ ability to implement our products in those countries.

There can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining or maintaining the licenses and other authorizations required to export our products from applicable government authorities. Any change in export or import regulations or related legislation, shift in approach to the enforcement or scope of existing regulations, changes in the list of countries to which we cannot export, or changes in persons or technologies targeted by such regulations could result in decreased use of our products by, or in our decreased ability to export or sell our products to, existing or potential customers with international operations. Changes in our products or changes in export and import regulations may create delays in the introduction of our products in international markets, prevent our customers with international operations from deploying our products throughout their global systems or, in some cases, prevent the export or import of our products to certain countries altogether. Any change in export or import regulations or related legislation, a shift in approach to the enforcement or scope of existing regulations, or change in the countries, persons or technologies targeted by such regulations, could result in decreased use of our products by, or in our decreased ability to export or sell our products to, existing or potential customers with international operations.

Export laws and regulations can be extremely complex in their application. If we are found not to have complied with applicable export control laws, we may be sanctioned, fined or penalized by, among other things, having our ability to obtain export licenses curtailed or eliminated, possibly for an extended period of time. Our failure to receive or maintain any required export licenses or authorizations or our being penalized for failure to comply with applicable export control laws would hinder our ability to sell our products, could result in financial penalties, and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Any failure on our part or the part of our distributors to comply with encryption or other applicable export control requirements could harm our business and operating results.

Import and export regulations of encryption/decryption technology vary from country to country. We may be subject to different statutory or regulatory controls in different foreign jurisdictions, and as such, importation of our technology may not be permitted in these foreign jurisdictions. Violations of foreign regulations or regulation of international transactions could prevent us from being able to sell our products in international markets. Our success depends in large part on our having access to international markets. A violation of foreign regulations could limit our access to such markets and have a negative effect on our results of operations.

As our international sales grow, we could become increasingly subject to additional risks that could harm our business.

We conduct significant sales and customer support in countries outside of the United States. Approximately 23% and 24% of our sales were to purchasers outside the United States in 2016 and 2015, respectively. If our sales outside the United States increase, we may be required to further expand our international operations. To successfully expand international sales, we must establish additional foreign operations, hire additional personnel and recruit additional international resellers. We may also incur additional expense translating our applications into additional languages. In addition, there is significant competition for entry into high growth markets. Our international operations are subject to a variety of risks, which could cause fluctuations in the results of our international operations. These risks include:

·	Compliance with foreign regulatory and market requirements.

·	Variability of foreign economic, political and labor conditions.

·	Changing restrictions imposed by regulatory requirements, tariffs or other trade barriers or by U.S. export laws.

·	Longer accounts receivable payment cycles.

·	Potentially adverse tax consequences.

Table of Contents

·	Difficulties in protecting intellectual property.

·	Burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws.

·	Difficulty transferring funds to the U.S. in a tax efficient manner from non-U.S. jurisdictions in which the cash flow originates.

We are subject to risks associated with compliance with laws and regulations globally which may harm our business.

We are a global company subject to varied and complex laws, regulations and customs domestically and internationally. These laws and regulations relate to a number of aspects of our business, including trade protection, import and export control, data and transaction processing security, payment card industry data security standards, records management, user-generated content hosted on websites we operate, corporate governance, employee and third-party complaints, gift policies, conflicts of interest, employment and labor relations laws, securities regulations and other regulatory requirements affecting trade and investment. The application of these laws and regulations to our business is often unclear and may at times conflict. Compliance with these laws and regulations may involve significant costs or require changes in our business practices that result in reduced revenue and profitability. Non-compliance could also result in fines, damages, or criminal sanctions against us, our officers or our employees, prohibitions on the conduct of our business, and damage to our reputation. We incur additional legal compliance costs associated with our global operations and could become subject to legal penalties if we fail to comply with local laws and regulations in U.S. jurisdictions or in foreign countries, which laws and regulations may be substantially different from those in the U.S. In many foreign countries, particularly in those with developing economies, it is common to engage in business practices that are prohibited by U.S. regulations applicable to us, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Although we implement policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these laws, there can be no assurance that all of our employees, contractors and agents, as well as those companies to which we outsource certain of our business operations, including those based in or from countries where practices that violate such U.S. laws may be customary, will not take actions in violation of our internal policies. Any such violation, even if prohibited by our internal policies, could have an adverse effect on our business.

Failure to maintain proper and effective internal controls has affected, and could in the future affect, our ability to produce accurate financial statements which has resulted, and could in the future result, in the restatement of our financial statements, and such failure to maintain proper and effective internal controls could adversely affect our operating results, our ability to operate our business, and our stock price.

Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud. We maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting, which is defined as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP.

As we have experienced, failure to establish and maintain appropriate internal financial reporting controls and procedures could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, result in the restatement of our financial statements, harm our operating results, subject us to regulatory scrutiny and sanction, cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, and have a negative effect on the market price for shares of our common stock.

There are inherent limitations in all control systems, and misstatements due to error or fraud have occurred and may occur again in the future and not be detected.

The ongoing internal control provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 require us to identify material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, which is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that our internal controls and disclosure controls, even once remediated, will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefit of controls must be relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud in our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Further, controls can be circumvented by individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more persons, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving our stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, a control may be inadequate because of changes in conditions, such as growth of the company or increased transaction volume, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur again in the future and not be detected.

Table of Contents

In addition, discovery and disclosure of a material weakness, by definition, could have a material adverse impact on our financial statements. Such an occurrence could discourage certain customers or suppliers from doing business with us and affect how our stock trades. This could, in turn, negatively affect our ability to access public debt or equity markets for capital.

The amount of income taxes we compute as payable on our income tax returns filed with the Internal Revenue Service and certain states could be challenged by those taxing authorities resulting in us paying more taxes than anticipated.

We file income tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service and taxing authorities in certain states. We prepare and file those returns based on our interpretations of the relevant tax code as to revenue to be reported and deductions and credits allowed. We use third-party experts to assist us in preparing our tax returns and computing our tax liabilities to help us ensure we pay the proper amount of tax due. Our tax returns are subject to examination by taxing authorities that could interpret the tax code in a different manner from us and conclude we are obligated to pay more taxes than we originally computed and paid. While we would defend the position taken on our tax returns as filed, a challenge from a taxing authority can be costly to defend with no assurance of a favorable outcome for us. In the event of an unfavorable result under these circumstances, our business, operating results and financial position could be harmed.

The amount of sales tax we collect on sales could be challenged by taxing authorities both in jurisdictions in which we have a corporate presence as well as by taxing authorities in areas where we have no corporate presence.

We collect and remit sales tax on sales in jurisdictions where we have a corporate or physical presence that results in an obligation to do so. We sell our products to customers in numerous locations where we do not have a corporate or physical presence and, therefore, do not collect sales tax on those sales. States in which we collect sales tax could audit our activities and assess us with additional tax based on their interpreting the sales tax code differently than we interpret it. Various states in which we do not collect sales tax are aggressive in interpreting their sales tax codes in determining if a company with no apparent presence in those states is obligated to collect and remit sales taxes, particularly on sales made across the Internet. States where we do not collect sales tax could make an assertion that we should have been collecting sales tax and could assess us with that tax. While we would defend our position taken as to our obligation to collect sales tax and the amount of sales tax collected, a challenge from a taxing authority can be costly to defend with no assurance of a favorable outcome for us. In the event of an unfavorable result under these circumstances, our business, operating results and financial position could be harmed.

Risks Related to Stock Ownership

Our stock price is and may continue to be, volatile.

The trading price of our common stock has been and could continue to be subject to wide fluctuations in response to certain factors, including:

·	U.S. and global economic conditions leading to general declines in market capitalizations, with such declines not associated with operating performance.

·	Quarter-to-quarter variations in results of operations.

·	Our announcements of new products.

·	Our announcements of acquisitions.

·	Our announcements of significant new customers or contracts.

·	Our competitors’ announcements of new products.

·	Our product development or release schedule.

·	Changes in our management team.

·	General conditions in the software industry.

·	Investor perceptions and expectations regarding our products, plans and strategic position and those of our competitors and customers.

Table of Contents

In addition, the public stock markets experience extreme price and trading volume volatility, particularly in high-technology sectors of the market. This volatility has significantly affected the market prices of securities of many technology companies for reasons often unrelated to the operating performance of the specific companies. The broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Accounting charges may cause fluctuations in our annual or quarterly financial results.

Our financial results may be affected by non-cash and other accounting charges, including:

·	Amortization of intangible assets, including acquired technology and product rights.

·	Acquisition expenses.

·	Impairment of goodwill and intangibles.

·	Share-based compensation expense.

·	Restructuring charges.

·	Impairment of long-lived assets.

·	Reserves for uncertain tax positions.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter and Delaware law could inhibit others from acquiring us.

Some of the provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and in Delaware law could, together or separately:

·	Discourage potential acquisition proposals.

·	Delay or prevent a change in control.

·	Limit the price that investors may be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.

In particular, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws prohibit stockholders from voting by written consent or calling meetings of the stockholders. We are also subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which generally prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any of a broad range of business combinations with any interested stockholder, as defined in the statute, for a period of three years following the date on which the stockholder became an interested stockholder.

Our directors and executive officers continue to have substantial control over us.

Our directors and executive officers, together with their affiliates and related persons, beneficially owned, in the aggregate, approximately 19% of our outstanding common stock as of March 1, 2017. These stockholders would have the ability to substantially control our operations and direct our policies including the outcome of matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, such as the election of directors and any acquisition or merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide for our Board of Directors to be divided into three classes of directors serving staggered three-year terms. As a result, approximately one-third of our Board of Directors will be elected each year.

Stockholders’ ownership of our stock may be significantly diluted as a result of the exercise of stock options, thereby affecting the value of the stock.

There were options to purchase 2,407,005 shares of our common stock outstanding under our employee and director stock option plans as of December 31, 2016, of which options to purchase 1,001,570 shares were vested. We have filed a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), covering stock issued upon the exercise of options by non-affiliates, and we may file a registration statement covering options held by affiliates as well. If we do not file a registration statement covering affiliates, affiliates who exercise their options may choose to sell the stock under an exemption from registration, such as Rule 144 under the Securities Act. The exercise of these options and sale of the resulting stock could depress the value of our stock.

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Intellectual Property

We are vulnerable to claims that our products infringe third-party intellectual property rights particularly because our products are partially developed by independent parties.

From time to time, we experience claims that our products infringe third-party intellectual property rights. We may be exposed to future litigation based on claims that our products infringe the intellectual property rights of others. This risk is exacerbated by the fact that some of the code in our products is developed by independent parties or licensed from third parties over whom we have less control than we exercise over internal developers. In addition, we expect that infringement claims against software developers will become more prevalent as the number of products and developers grows and the functionality of software programs in the market increasingly overlaps. Companies in the technology industry, and other patent and trademark holders seeking to profit from royalties in connection with grants of licenses, own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, and trade secrets and frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. In addition, we may be the target of aggressive and opportunistic enforcement of patents by third parties, including non-practicing entities.

Responding to and defending against such claims may cause us to incur significant expense and divert the time and efforts of our management and employees. Successful assertion of such claims could require that we pay substantial damages or ongoing royalty payments, prevent us from selling our products and services, damage our reputation, or require that we comply with other unfavorable terms, any of which could materially harm our business. In addition, we may decide to pay substantial settlement costs in connection with any claim or litigation, whether or not successfully asserted.

While it is not possible to predict the outcome of patent litigation incidents to our business, defense costs may be significant, and we believe the costs associated with this litigation or other claims of infringement could generally have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Regardless of the merit of such claims, responding to infringement claims can be expensive and time-consuming.

For any intellectual property rights claim against us or our customers, we may have to pay damages and indemnify our customers against damages.

Claims of infringement could require us to re-engineer our products or seek to obtain licenses from third parties in order to continue offering our products in a manner that may include licensing technologies from others. In addition, an adverse legal decision affecting our intellectual property, or the use of significant resources to defend against this type of claim could place a significant strain on our financial resources and harm our reputation.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights.

Our software code and trade and service marks are some of our most valuable assets. Given the global nature of the Internet and our business, we are vulnerable to the misappropriation of this intellectual property, particularly in foreign markets, such as China and Eastern Europe, where laws or law enforcement practices are less developed. The global nature of the Internet makes it difficult to control the ultimate destination or security of our software making it more likely that unauthorized third parties will copy certain portions of our proprietary information or reverse engineer the proprietary information used in our programs. If our proprietary rights were infringed by a third-party and we did not have adequate legal recourse, our ability to earn profits, which are highly dependent on those rights, would be severely diminished.

Other companies may own, obtain or claim trademarks that could prevent, limit or interfere with our use of our trademarks.

Our various trademarks are important to our business. If we were to lose the use of any of our trademarks, our business would be harmed and we would have to devote substantial resources towards developing an independent brand identity. Defending or enforcing our trademark rights at a local and international level could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.

Table of Contents

Risks Related to the Investigation and the Restatement

Matters relating to or arising from our Audit Committee investigation, including regulatory proceedings, litigation matters and potential additional expenses, may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

As previously disclosed in our public filings and in this Form 10-K/A, the Audit Committee has recently completed the investigation relating to revenue recognition. We are also the subject of an investigation by the SEC related to these matters.

We have incurred significant expenses related to legal, accounting, and other professional services in connection with the Audit Committee investigation and related matters and related remediation efforts. The expenses incurred, and expected to be incurred, in connection with the Audit Committee and SEC investigations, the impact of our delay in 2017 and to date in 2018 in meeting our periodic reporting requirements on the confidence of investors, employees and customers, and the diversion of the attention of the management team that has occurred, and is expected to continue, has adversely affected, and could continue to adversely affect, our business, financial condition and results of operations or cash flows.

As a result of the matters reported above, we are exposed to greater risks associated with litigation, regulatory proceedings and government enforcement actions. In addition, we have incurred significant legal expenses in connection with a securities class action that has been filed against us and certain of our directors and officers. Any future investigations or additional lawsuits may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We have restated our consolidated financial statements, which may lead to additional risks and uncertainties.

As discussed in Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”, of this Form 10-K/A, we have restated our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. The determination to restate these financial statements was made by our Audit Committee upon management’s recommendation. As a result of these events, we have become subject to a number of additional risks and uncertainties, including substantial unanticipated accounting and legal fees in connection with or related to the Restatement. Likewise, such events might cause a diversion of our management’s time and attention.

We are also subject to claims, investigations and proceedings arising out of the Restatement. For additional information regarding this litigation, see Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings”, of this Form 10-K/A.

The restatement of our previously issued financial results has resulted in private litigation and could result in private litigation judgments that could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject to shareholder litigation relating to the restatement of our previously filed financial statements and to certain of our previous public disclosures. For additional discussion of this litigation, see Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings”, of this Form 10-K/A. Our management has been, and may in the future be, required to devote significant time and attention to this litigation, and this and any additional matters that arise could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition as well as on our reputation. While we cannot estimate our potential exposure in these matters at this time, we have already incurred significant expense defending this litigation and expect to continue to need to incur significant expense in the defense.

The existence of the litigation may have an adverse effect on our reputation with our customers, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting which could, if not remediated, result in additional material misstatements in our consolidated financial statements.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). As disclosed in Part II, Item 9A, management has identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.

A material weakness is defined as a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In connection with our management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, our management identified the following deficiencies that constituted individually, or in the aggregate, material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.

Table of Contents

We had material weaknesses in our control environment and monitoring:

·	We did not implement effective oversight of our finance and accounting processes (including organizational structure and reporting hierarchy), which impacted our ability to make appropriate decisions regarding revenue recognition.

·	We did not effectively design and implement appropriate oversight controls over our period-end financial closing and reporting processes, and our review controls were not sufficient to ensure that errors regarding revenue recognition would be detected.

·	We did not effectively monitor (review, evaluate and assess) the risks associated with key internal control activities that provide the revenue information contained in our financial statements.

We had material weaknesses related to internal control monitoring and activities to support the financial reporting process:

·	We did not maintain effective controls over the invoicing process to ensure that proper supporting documentation was received prior to preparing invoices.

·	We did not maintain effective controls over the revenue recognition process to ensure revenue was only recognized when all four criteria of our revenue recognition policy were met.

Because of these material weaknesses, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective based on criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-An Integrated Framework (2013).

As disclosed in Part II, Item 9A, we have developed and are in the process of implementing remediation plans designed to address these material weaknesses. If our remedial measures are insufficient to address the material weaknesses, or if additional material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control are discovered or occur in the future, our consolidated financial statements may contain material misstatements and we could be required to restate our financial results, which could lead to substantial additional costs for accounting and legal fees.

Any additional revisions or restatements of our consolidated financial statements may lead to a further loss of investor confidence and have a negative impact on the trading prices of our securities. Any of these matters could adversely affect our business, reputation, revenues, results of operations and financial condition and limit our ability to access the capital markets through equity or debt issuances.

We face risks related to an ongoing Securities and Exchange Commission investigation.

On January 11, 2018, we received a subpoena from the SEC which has since opened a formal investigation relating to, among other things, the Restatement (the “SEC Investigation”). See Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” of this Form 10-K/A for a discussion of the SEC Investigation. We are cooperating fully with the SEC Investigation. At this point, we are unable to predict what the outcome of the SEC Investigation may be or what, if any, consequences the SEC Investigation may have with respect to the Company or any current or former Company personnel. However, the SEC Investigation could result in considerable legal expenses, divert management’s attention from other business concerns and harm our business. If the SEC were to determine that legal violations occurred, we could be required to pay significant civil and/or criminal penalties and/or other amounts and we could become subject to a cease and desist order and/or other remedies or conditions imposed as part of any resolution. We can provide no assurances as to the outcome of the SEC Investigation.

Our indemnification obligations and limitations of our director and officer liability insurance may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Under Delaware law, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and certain indemnification agreements to which we are a party, we have an obligation to indemnify, or we have otherwise agreed to indemnify, certain of our current and former directors and officers with respect to current and future investigations and litigation, including the matters discussed in Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” of this Form 10-K/A. In connection with some of these pending matters, we are required to, or we have otherwise agreed to, advance, and have advanced, legal fees and related expenses to certain of our current and former directors and officers and expect to continue to do so while these matters are pending. Certain of these obligations may not be “covered matters” under our directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, or there may be insufficient coverage available. Further, in the event the directors and officers are ultimately determined not to be entitled to indemnification, we may not be able to recover the amounts we previously advanced to them.

Table of Contents

In addition, we have incurred significant expenses in connection with the Audit Committee’s independent investigation, the pending SEC Investigation, and shareholder litigation. We cannot provide any assurances that past or future claims related to those or other matters, including the cost of fees, penalties or other expenses, will not exceed the limits of our insurance policies, that such claims are covered by the terms of our insurance policies or that our insurance carrier will be able to cover our claims. Additionally, to the extent there is coverage of these claims, the insurers also may seek to deny or limit coverage in some or all of these matters. Furthermore, the insurers could become insolvent and unable to fulfill their obligation to defend, pay or reimburse us for insured claims. Accordingly, we cannot be sure that claims will not arise that are in excess of the limits of our insurance or that are not covered by the terms of our insurance policy. Due to these coverage limitations, we may incur significant unreimbursed costs to satisfy our indemnification obligations, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

Our corporate office is in San Antonio, Texas. That office contains approximately 21,000 square feet for which the average annual rent under the lease is $347,000. We believe these facilities are suitable for our current business needs and that suitable, additional space would be available if needed in the future under acceptable terms.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

GlobalSCAPE had been named as one of a number of defendants in a patent infringement suit filed by Digital Reg of Texas, LLC in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division. The complaint alleged that we infringed on a patent that regulates access to digital content. In February 2017, we settled this matter for an amount that was immaterial to our financial position and results of operations.

As previously disclosed in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 15, 2017, on August 9, 2017, a securities class action complaint, Anthony Giovagnoli v. GlobalSCAPE, Inc., et. al., Case No. 5:17-cv-00753, was filed against the Company in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The complaint names as defendants the Company, Matthew Goulet, and James Albrecht for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements regarding, inter alia, the Company’s previously reported financial statements. The complaint alleges violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The complaint seeks unspecified damages, costs, attorneys’ fees, and equitable relief. On November 6, 2017, the Court appointed a lead plaintiff, who has agreed to file an amended complaint following the completion of the Restatement. Management intends to vigorously defend against this action. At this time, the Company cannot predict how the courts will rule on the merits of the claims and/or the scope of the potential loss in the event of an adverse outcome. Should the Company ultimately be found liable, the resulting damages could have a material adverse effect on its financial position, liquidity, or results of operations.

On October 20, 2017, the Company received a demand letter from a stockholder seeking the inspection of books and records of the Company pursuant to Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “Section 220 Demand”). This stockholder’s stated purpose for the demand is, inter alia, to investigate whether the Company’s Board of Directors and officers engaged in an illegal scheme to misrepresent the Company’s performance by falsely reporting accounts receivable, license revenue, total current assets and total assets, total stockholders’ equity, and total liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2016, as well as the Board’s independence to consider a stockholder derivative demand. The Company intends to fully respond to the Section 220 Demand to the extent required under Delaware law.

The Board has established a special litigation committee (“Special Litigation Committee”) consisting of Dr. Thomas Hicks and Frank Morgan to analyze and investigate claims that could potentially be asserted in stockholder derivative litigation related to facts connected to the claims and allegations asserted in the litigation related to the Restatement and the Section 220 Demand (the “Potential Derivative Litigation”). The Special Litigation Committee will determine what actions are appropriate and in the best interests of the Company, and decide whether it is in the best interests of the Company to pursue, dismiss, or consensually resolve any claims that may be asserted in the Potential Derivative Litigation. The Board determined that each member of the Special Litigation Committee is disinterested and independent with respect to the Potential Derivative Litigation. Among other things, the Special Litigation Committee has the power to retain counsel and advisors, as appropriate, to assist it in the investigation, to gather and review relevant documents relating to the claims, to interview persons who may have knowledge of the relevant information, to prepare a report setting forth its conclusions and recommended course of action with respect to the Potential Derivative Litigation, and to take any actions, including, without limitation, directing the filing and prosecution of litigation on behalf of the Company, as the Special Litigation Committee in its sole discretion deems to be in the best interests of the Company in connection with the Potential Derivative Litigation. The Special Litigation Committee’s findings and determinations shall be final and not subject to review by the Board and in all respects shall be binding upon the Company.

Table of Contents

As disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 16, 2018, the Fort Worth, Texas Regional Office of the SEC has opened a formal investigation of issues relating to the Restatement, with which the Company is cooperating fully. At this time, the Company is unable to predict the duration, scope, result or related costs associated with the SEC’s investigation. The Company is also unable to predict what, if any, action may be taken by the SEC, or what penalties or remedial actions the SEC may seek. Any determination by the SEC that the Company’s activities were not in compliance with existing laws or regulations, however, could result in the imposition of fines, penalties, disgorgement, equitable relief, or other losses, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, liquidity, or results of operations.

On May 31, 2018, the Company was served with a subpoena issued by a grand jury sitting in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (the “Grand Jury Subpoena”). The Grand Jury Subpoena requests all documents and emails relating to the Company’s investigation of the potential improper recognition of software license revenue. The Company intends to fully cooperate with the Grand Jury Subpoena and related investigation being conducted by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Texas (the “U.S. Attorney’s Investigation”). At this time, the Company is unable to predict the duration, scope, result or related costs of the U.S. Attorney’s Investigation. The Company is also unable to predict what, if any, further action may be taken in connection with the Grand Jury Subpoena and the U.S. Attorney’s Investigation, or what, if any, penalties, sanctions or remedial actions may be sought. Any determination by the U.S. Attorney’s office that the Company’s activities were not in compliance with existing laws or regulations, however, could result in the imposition of fines, penalties, disgorgement, equitable relief, or other losses, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, liquidity, or results of operations.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable.

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity

Our common stock is listed on the NYSE MKT Exchange under the symbol “GSB”. The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low closing sale prices for our common stock for the last two fiscal years.

	2016				2015
	High		Low		High		Low
First Quarter (ending March 31)	$	4.08	$	3.27	$	3.67	$	2.17
Second Quarter (ending June 30)	$	4.00	$	3.20	$	3.49	$	3.07
Third Quarter (ending September 30)	$	3.87	$	3.41	$	3.56	$	3.14
Fourth Quarter (ending December 31)	$	4.18	$	3.35	$	4.28	$	3.20

Annual		4.18		3.20		4.28		2.17

On March 20, 2017, the last reported sales price of our common stock on the NYSE MKT Exchange was $3.98 per share. As of March 20, 2017, we had approximately 1,793 stockholders of record of our common stock.

We paid quarterly dividends of $.015 per share on March 8, 2016, June 8, 2016, September 8, 2016 and December 8, 2016 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 23, 2016, May 23, 2016, August 23, 2016 and November 23, 2016, respectively. The timing and amount of dividends to be paid, if any, in subsequent quarters will be determined on future dates by the Board of Directors.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following selected financial data is derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this and previous annual reports. This data is qualified in its entirety by and should be read in conjunction with the more detailed Financial Statements and related notes included in this annual report and with Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”. Historical results may not be indicative of future results.

As discussed in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this annual report, in preparing our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2016, and for the year then ended, we changed accounting methods and/or made reclassifications and revisions in the following areas:

·	Method of Amortization of Deferred Revenue Related to M&S Agreements

·	Method of Recording M&S Billings

·	Reclassification of Sales Engineer Expenses

·	Reclassification of Reserve for Uncertain Tax Position

The financial information presented below as of December 31, 2015, and for the year then ended, has been restated from previously reported amounts to reflect the effects of the items listed above as well as the restatement discussed in Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. See the tables in Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for the impact of the effects of these items.

Table of Contents

The amounts presented for years prior to 2015 have not been revised as the effect of these items is not material to previously reported amounts for those years.

Statement of Operations Data:
($ in thousands except per share amounts)
	Year Ended December 31,
	2016		2015		2014		2013		2012

Total revenues	$	32,595	$	30,735	$	26,770	$	24,339	$	23,372
Income (loss) from operations	$	5,227	$	6,309	$	4,615	$	3,901	$	(1,394	)
Net income (loss)	$	3,585	$	4,526	$	3,026	$	3,840	$	(1,800	)

Net income (loss) per common share - basic	$	0.17	$	0.22	$	0.15	$	0.21	$	(0.10	)
Net income (loss) per common share - diluted	$	0.17	$	0.21	$	0.15	$	0.20	$	(0.10	)

Cash dividends declared per share	$	0.060	$	0.045	$	0.050	$	0.050	$	0.070

Balance Sheet Data:
($ in thousands)
	2016		2015		2014		2013		2012

Total assets	$	49,745	$	44,325	$	38,387	$	33,092	$	33,588
Long term debt, less current portion	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	2,989	$	4,389

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, and related notes included elsewhere in this document.

Overview

Our primary business is selling and supporting managed file transfer, or MFT, software for enterprises. The brand name of our MFT product platform is Enhanced File Transfer, or EFT.

We also sell other products that are synergistic to EFT including Mail Express, WAFS, and CuteFTP. Collectively, these products constitute less than 10% of our total revenue.

We focus on selling our EFT platform products in a business-to-business environment. The majority of the resources we will expend in the future for product research, development, marketing and sales will focus on our EFT platform products. We believe our products and business capabilities are well-positioned to compete effectively in the market for MFT products. For a more comprehensive discussion of the products we sell and the services we offer, see “Business - Software Products and Services” above.

Table of Contents

Key Business Metrics

We review a number of key business metrics on an ongoing basis to help us monitor our performance and to identify material trends which may affect our business. The significant metrics we review are described below.

Revenue Growth

We believe annual revenue growth is a key metric for monitoring our continued success in developing our business in future periods. Given our diverse solution portfolio, we review our revenue mix and changes in revenue, across all solutions, on a regular basis to identify key trends. We believe our revenue growth is primarily dependent upon executing our business strategies which include:

·	Ongoing innovation of our EFT platform to address the expanding needs of our existing customers and enhancing our products’ appeal to new customers.

·	Licensing, developing and/or acquiring technologies with features and functions that are complementary to and synergistic with our EFT platform so as to expand the breadth of our products offerings.

·	Enhancing our sales and marketing programs to improve identification of potential demand for our products and to increase the rate at which we are successful in selling our products.

We remain alert for attractive opportunities to collaborate with others or perhaps combine other revenue-producing technologies with ours to expand our product offerings and reach. To that end, we continually assess products and services offered by others that might be synergistic with our existing products. We may elect to take advantage of those opportunities through cooperative marketing agreements or licensing arrangements or by acquiring an ownership position in the enterprise offering the opportunity.

In continuing to develop our demand generation activities, we have made and continue to make ongoing changes in sales and marketing including:

·	Increasing sales staff capacity as needed to address our markets.

·	Aligning our sales group to enhance its industry and geographic focus.

·	Implementing new sales and marketing campaigns.

·	Using third-party digital marketing experts with search engine optimization expertise to enhance our efforts in this area.

·	Evolving our lead generation programs to increase our sales staff’s exposure to potential purchasers.

·	Enhancing our support of channel partners and engaging them to sell our products through training, orientation and marketing programs.

As part of growing revenue in total, we are focused on increasing license revenue both in terms of absolute dollars and as a percent of total revenue. When we sell our licensed products, we also typically create a recurring revenue stream from M&S since almost all purchasers of our licensed enterprise products also purchase an M&S contract. Most of our M&S contracts are for one year although we also sell multi-year contracts. The customer pays us the M&S fee for the entire term of the agreement at the time the contract begins. We recognize that amount as revenue ratably in future periods over the term of the contract.

We typically experience a high renewal rate for M&S services for our enterprise products so long as a customer continues using the licensed product they purchased from us. As a result, growing license revenue not only contributes to increasing revenue growth at the time the license is sold but also provides a foundation for future recurring revenue as the purchasers of our licensed products renew M&S agreements to support their ongoing product support needs. This pattern of activity can create a cumulative effect for M&S renewals as a result of the cumulative number of licensed software installations sold over multiple years that create M&S renewals in any single year predictably (and in line with our expectations) exceeding the number of new software licenses we sell in a single year. We expect this cumulative effect to continue to grow if we continue to increase enterprise software license revenue in future periods. For these reasons, we expect M&S revenue will remain a substantial part of our total revenue.

Table of Contents

See Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2016 to the Year Ended December 31, 2015 for a discussion of trends in our revenue growth that we monitor using this metric.

In the past, we reported bookings and potential future revenue as key business metrics. With the refinement of our revenue growth key business metric discussed above, we no longer rely on bookings or potential future revenue as key business metrics since we have determined that our revenue growth metric is the primary metric upon which we rely to measure the success of sales and marketing programs and our outlook for revenue in the future.

Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP Measurement)

We utilize Adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Total Other Income/Expense, Depreciation, Amortization, other than amortization of capitalized software development costs, and Share-Based Compensation Expense) to provide us a view of income and expenses that is supplemental and secondary to our primary assessment of net income as presented in our consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income. We use Adjusted EBITDA to provide another perspective for measuring profitability from our core operating activities that does not include the effects of the following items:

·	Expenses that typically do not require us to pay them in cash in the current period (such as depreciation, amortization and share-based compensation);

·	The cost of financing our business;

·	The effects of income taxes.

We monitor the components of EBITDA to assess our actual performance relative to our plans, budgets and expectations and use the results of that assessment to adjust our future activities to the extent we deem necessary.

Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. It should not be considered as a substitute for net income presented on our consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income. Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and when assessing our operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or without a simultaneous reading and consideration of our consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP.

We compute Adjusted EBITDA as follows ($ in thousands):

	Year Ended
	December 31
	2016			2015
Net Income	$	3,585		$	4,526
Add (subtract) items to determine adjusted EBITDA:
Income tax expense		1,801			1,861
Interest (income) expense, net		(159	)		(78	)
Depreciation and amortization:
Total depreciation and amortization		2,045			1,553
Amortization of capitalized software development costs		(1,777	)		(1,283	)
Stock-based compensation expense		1,014			711
Adjusted EBITDA	$	6,509		$	7,290

See Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2016 to Year Ended December 31, 2015 for discussion of the variances between periods in the components comprising Adjusted EBITDA.

Table of Contents

Solution Perspective and Trends

Our discussion of the business trends of our products is based on the following profile of our revenue components ($ in thousands):

	2016					2015
			Percent of					Percent of
	Amount		Total			Amount		Total

Revenue By Type
License	$	11,243		34.5	%	$	12,023		39.1	%
M&S		18,668		57.3	%		16,489		53.7	%
Professional Services		2,684		8.2	%		2,223		7.2	%
Total Revenue	$	32,595		100.0	%	$	30,735		100.0	%

Revenue by Product Line
License
EFT Platform	$	10,237		91.1	%	$	10,459		87.0	%
Other		1,006		8.9	%		1,564		13.0	%
		11,243		100.0	%		12,023		100.0	%
M&S
EFT Platform		17,432		93.4	%		15,006		91.0	%
Other		1,236		6.6	%		1,483		9.0	%
		18,668		100.0	%		16,489		100.0	%

Professional Services (all EFT Platform)		2,684		100.0	%		2,223		100.0	%

Total Revenue
EFT Platform		30,353		93.1	%		27,688		90.1	%
Other		2,242		6.9	%		3,047		9.9	%
	$	32,595		100.0	%	$	30,735		100.0	%

We earn revenue primarily from the following activities:

•

License revenue from sales of our EFT platform products that we deliver as either perpetually-licensed software installed at the customer’s premises, for which we earn the full amount of the license revenue at the time the license is delivered, or as a cloud-based service under our EFT Cloud Services brand delivered using a SaaS model, for which we earn monthly subscription revenue as these services are delivered.

•	License revenue from sales of our Mail Express, WAFS and CuteFTP products that are installed at the customer’s premises under a perpetual license for which we earn the full amount of the license revenue at the time the license is delivered.

•	M&S revenue under contracts to provide ongoing product support and software updates to our customers who have purchased licensed software which we recognize ratably over the contractual period, which is typically one year but can be up to three years.

•	Professional services revenue from a variety of configuration, implementation, and integration services, as well as delivery of education and training associated with our solutions, which we recognize as the services are completed.

Table of Contents

We earn most of our revenue from the sale of our EFT platform products and the associated M&S and professional services related to those products. With our core competency being in products that address the MFT market, we believe our EFT platform products provide the best opportunity for our future growth. Accordingly, expansion of the capabilities of the EFT platform will be our primary focus in the future. While we will continue to sell and support our other products for the foreseeable future, they will not be an area of emphasis for us going forward.

We believe that continuing to offer licensed products installed on-premises for which we recognize revenue up-front and that carry with them a recurring M&S revenue stream is important to our future success. At the same time, we recognize that a migration of capabilities to a SaaS platform is attractive to a growing number of customers. We have, and have had for quite some time, the capabilities in place to deliver our EFT platform in that manner. However, this migration could create some near-term decreases in the growth rate of license revenue, and may result in similar decreases in future periods, because it typically takes approximately 24 to 36 months of SaaS revenue to yield total revenue equivalent to that realized up-front from the sale of a license for an on-premise installation.

In mid-2016, we reviewed the allocation of our product research and development resources across all of our products. As a result of that review, we decided to adjust that allocation to focus most of our engineering resources involved in product research and development on our EFT platform products in order to expand their capabilities and to remain positioned to be responsive to the evolving needs of our customers.

Over the past few years, we have developed and offered individual product lines that include EFT, Mail Express, WAFS, and CuteFTP. Each of these product lines addresses distinct needs in the marketplace. While some customers purchase products from more than one of these product lines, for the most part, customers in a particular market or vertical have needs that are addressed by only one of these products and, therefore, purchase only that product. With respect to Mail Express, while we will continue to offer it as stand-alone product for the time being, the engineering resources we allocate to this technology will focus on migrating it to becoming an integrated component of our EFT platform. We do not expect to expend significant resources in the future on expanding the features and capabilities of WAFS and CuteFTP although we will continue to sell those products and support them.

To support product innovation, we continue to enhance our software engineering group and our focus on optimizing the manner in which we assess the development of new technologies, our approach to managing those projects, and the timelines over which we do that work. In continuing to develop our demand generation activities, we have made and continue to make ongoing changes in sales and marketing including:

·	Increasing sales staffing and capabilities as needed to address our markets.

·	Aligning our sales group to enhance its industry and geographic focus.

·	Implementing new sales and marketing campaigns.

·	Evolving our lead generation programs to increase our sales staff’s exposure to potential purchasers.

·	Enhancing our support of channel partners and engaging them to sell our products through training, orientation and marketing programs.

Our total revenue increased 6.1% in 2016 and 14.8% in 2015. For a more complete discussion of these revenue trends, see Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2016 to Year Ended December 31, 2015.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash and working capital positions were as follows (in thousands):

	December 31, 2016		December 31, 2015
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,895	$	15,885
Short term investments		2,754		3,254
Long term investments		12,779		-
Total cash, cash equivalents, short and long term investments	$	24,428	$	19,139

Working capital	$	2,572	$	10,941
Deferred revenue, current portion		13,655		12,460
Working capital plus current deferred revenue (non-GAAP presentation)	$	16,227	$	23,401

Table of Contents

At December 31, 2016, our short term investments consisted of certificates of deposit maturing on various dates through October 2017. Our long term investments as of that date consisted of certificates of deposit maturing after December 31, 2017, on various dates through December 2021.

Deferred revenue, unlike the other liability components of our working capital, is an obligation we will satisfy by providing services in the future to our customers as part of our ongoing operating activities from which we have historically generated cash flow. Our deferred revenue does not involve a disbursement of cash as a direct payment of that liability. Accordingly, we assess our working capital needs using both the GAAP computation that includes all current liabilities as well as assess it by excluding the current portion of deferred revenue. Working capital plus the current portion of deferred revenue is not a measure of financial position under GAAP, has limitations as an analytical tool and when assessing our financial position and should not be considered a substitute for working capital computed in accordance with GAAP.

Our capital requirements principally relate to our need to fund our ongoing operating expenditures, which are primarily related to employee salaries and benefits. We make these expenditures to enhance our existing products, develop new products, sell those products in the marketplace and support our customers after the sale.

We rely on cash on hand and cash flows from operations to fund our operating activities and believe those items will be our principal sources of capital for the foreseeable future. If our revenue declines and/or our expenses increase, our cash flow from operations and cash on hand could decline. We plan to expend significant resources in the future for research and development of our products and expansion and enhancement of our sales and marketing activities. If sales decline or if our liquidity is otherwise under duress, we could substantially reduce personnel and personnel-related costs, reduce or substantially eliminate capital expenditures and/or reduce or substantially eliminate certain research and development and sales and marketing expenditures. We may also sell equity or debt securities or enter into credit arrangements in order to finance future acquisitions or licensing activities, to the extent available.

Cash provided or used by our various activities consisted of the following ($ in thousands):

	Cash Provided (Used) During the Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015
Operating activities	$	7,065		$	7,020
Investing activities	$	(13,880	)	$	(2,119	)
Financing activities	$	(175	)	$	(374	)

Our cash provided by operating activities increased during 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to:

Deferred revenue increasing $1.2 million during 2016 compared to increasing $708,000 during 2015 primarily due to 2016 having a larger number of renewals of multi-year M&S agreements than occurred in 2015. Since we collect payment for the full term of an M&S agreement at the beginning of the agreement, we generally receive larger cash payments at the beginning of a multi-year agreement than we receive at the beginning of a comparable single year agreement.

Accounts payable increasing $91,000 in 2016 compared to decreasing $272,000 during 2015 primarily due to a higher use of third-party software developers in 2015 compared to 2016 for which extended payment terms were generally not available. The remainder of variations in accounts payable in 2016 compared to 2015 was due to normal variations in the timing of payments to our vendors.

Federal income tax receivable decreasing $229,000 in 2016 compared to increasing $233,000 in 2015 due primarily to the Internal Revenue Service completing its examination of certain of our federal income tax returns for certain prior years and refunding to us in 2016 taxes paid in prior years. The remainder of the change was due to our taxable income being lower for 2016 than for 2015 and normal variations in the timing of our tax payments.

Table of Contents

Offset by:

·	Accounts receivable increasing $532,000 during 2016 compared to remaining relatively unchanged during 2015 as a result of there being an increased number of larger transactions in the fourth quarter of 2016 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2015 for which payment was not due until 2017.

·	Accrued expenses decreasing $290,000 in 2016 compared to increasing $303,000 in 2015 due primarily to normal variations in the timing of our payroll payment dates relative to the date of the balance sheet presented as part of our financial statements.

·	Other assets increasing $185,000 during 2016 as compared to decreasing $40,000 during 2015 primarily due to a prepayment in 2016 of a group healthcare premium related to 2017 as a result of a change in our healthcare insurance provider.

The increased use of cash for investing activities during 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to refining our cash management policies that resulted in our purchasing higher levels of short term and long term certificates of deposit during 2016 as compared to 2015, offset by a decrease in our software development costs that were capitalized. While the scope and magnitude of our software development activities were substantially the same between these periods, the cost of that work was less in 2016 compared to 2015 due to increased use of our employees to do this work in 2016 compared to 2015 when we relied more on the use of higher cost, third-party software developers.

The decreased use of cash for financing activities during 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to:

An increase in cash received from the exercise of stock options during 2016 as a result of us recruiting more experienced personnel with broader capabilities that in turn resulted in more people departing the Company in 2016 than in 2015 which resulted in more stock options being exercised before reaching their post-employment expiration date.

Offset by:

·	An increase in cash paid for dividends due to the payment of four quarterly dividends in 2016 as compared to the payment of three quarterly dividends in 2015.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

At December 31, 2016, our contractual obligations and commitments consisted primarily of the following items:

An obligation to deliver services in the future to satisfy our right to earn our deferred revenue of $17.4 million. Those future services primarily relate to our obligations to under M&S contracts. We will recognize this deferred revenue as revenue over the remaining life of those contracts which generally ranges from one to three years. Deferred revenue, unlike the other liability components of our working capital, is an obligation we will satisfy through providing services in the future to our customers as part of our ongoing operating activities from which we have historically generated cash flow. Our deferred revenue does not involve a disbursement of cash as a direct payment of that liability.

·	Trade accounts payable and accrued liabilities which include our contractual obligations to pay software royalties to third parties that vary in amount based on our sales volume of products upon which royalties are payable.

·	Operating lease for our office space.

·	Federal and state taxes.

Our non-cancellable, contractual obligations at December 31, 2016 consisted of the following (in thousands):

	Amounts Due for the Period
	Fiscal Years
	2017		2018 - 2020		Thereafter		Total

Operating leases	$	360	$	480	$	-	$	840

Table of Contents

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, has issued the following Accounting Standard Updates (ASU) that we believe may be relevant to our business and to the preparation of our financial statements:

ASU 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (issued January 2017) - To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, Step 2 was eliminated from the goodwill impairment test. In computing the implied fair value of goodwill under Step 2, an entity was required to perform procedures to determine the fair value at the impairment testing date of its assets and liabilities (including unrecognized assets and liabilities) following the procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Instead, under the amendments in this update, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. Any loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Additionally, an entity should consider income tax effects from any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable. This update also eliminated the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and, if it fails that qualitative test, to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. Therefore, the same impairment assessment applies to all reporting units. An entity is required to disclose the amount of goodwill allocated to each reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount of net assets. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. A public business entity that is a SEC filer is required to adopt the amendments in this update for its annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. We expect that the application of the provisions of this update will not have a material effect on our financial statements.

ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (issued June 2016) - Among the provisions of this ASU is a requirement that assets measured at amortized cost, which includes trade accounts receivable, be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. This pronouncement requires that an entity reflect all of its expected credit losses based on current estimates which will replace the current standard requiring that an entity need consider only past events and current conditions in measuring an incurred loss. We are subject to this guidance effective with financial statements we issue for the year ending December 31, 2020, and the quarterly periods during that year. We do not expect the amounts we report as accounts receivable in those future periods under this guidance to be materially affected relative to current guidance.

ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (issued March 2016) - When implemented, this standard will discontinue the recording in equity of tax benefits or tax deficiencies that arise from differences between share-based payment compensation expense recorded for financial statement purposes and that expense deductible for tax purposes. This new standard requires that the tax effect of all such differences be recorded and reported in the statement of operations. This standard also requires that tax-related cash flows resulting from share-based payments be reported as operating activities in the statement of cash flows which is a change from the current requirement to present such tax-related items as an inflow from financing activities and an outflow from operating activities. In accordance with this standard, we will implement it beginning with our interim and annual financial statements for 2017. The extent of the effect of this standard on our financial statements for 2017 and later depends upon the level of stock option exercise activity we experience in 2017 and later. The amounts involved in accounting for tax benefits or deficiencies from share-based compensation that are the subject of ASU 2016-09 are presented in our 2016 and earlier consolidated statements of cash flows and consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity on lines that are captioned tax benefit or tax deficiency from share-based compensation.

ASU 2016-02, Leases (issued February 2016). The main difference between existing GAAP and this ASU 2016-02 is the presentation by lessees on their financial statements of lease assets and lease liabilities arising from operating leases. Since this new standard retains the distinction between finance and operating leases, the effect of leases in the statement of operations and the statement of cash flows will be largely unchanged from existing GAAP. Our only lease of significance is our operating lease for our corporate office space for which we will present a right-to-use asset and a lease liability on our balance sheet when we implement this standard. We are in the process of determining those amounts. In accordance with this standard, we will implement it beginning with our interim and annual financial statements for 2019. The extent of the effect of this standard on our financial statements for 2019 and later will depend upon the leases, if any, that we have in effect at that date.

Table of Contents

ASU 2015-17, Income Tax: Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (issued November 2015) – This pronouncement requires that all deferred tax assets and liabilities for a tax jurisdiction, along with any related valuation allowance, be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. We have implemented this ASU in the accompanying consolidated financial statements in the manner described in the Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements below.

ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (issued May 2014) - The core principle of this guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. We will implement these new principles effective with consolidated financial statements we issue for the year ending December 31, 2018, and the quarterly periods during that year.

We have assessed the effect of ASU 2014-09 on the amount and timing of revenue we expect to recognize from our business activities in 2018 and later. We do not expect there to be material differences in the amount and timing of revenue we recognize from similar business activities in future periods determined by applying ASU 2014-09 as compared to revenue we would have otherwise recognized by applying GAAP as it existed prior to 2018.

We have determined that the application of ASU 2014-09 will have a material effect on the timing of our recording of expenses resulting from the incremental costs we incur to obtain a contract with a customer to deliver goods and services. These incremental costs consist primarily of sales commissions paid to our sales people and royalties on certain of our products paid to third parties. For years ended December 31, 2017, and earlier, we recorded the full amount of the sales commission and royalties paid on the full value of an M&S or SaaS contract as an expense on the inception date of the M&S contract. Under ASU 2014-09, we will account for such costs we incur in 2018 and later as follows:

·	If these costs are associated with products and services for which we recognize revenue at a point in time (primarily sales of perpetual software licenses and professional services), we will expense these costs in full at the time we recognize that revenue.

If these costs are associated with services for which we recognize revenue over time (primarily sales of M&S and SaaS subscriptions) for which we believe it is likely that the contract for those services will be renewed for additional terms in the future, provided we deem these costs to be recoverable, we will record these costs as deferred expense asset and amortize that cost to expense as follows:

o	For the portion of the cost that we determine benefits us primarily only over the term of the specific underlying contract currently in force (such as the term of an M&S contract), we will recognize expense ratably each month over that term.

For the portion of the cost that we determine benefits us over an overall customer relationship that is likely to span period of time that is longer than an initial contract term (for example, an M&S contract renewed for multiple terms in the future), we will recognize expense ratably monthly over the estimated life of the customer relationship.

Our application of ASU 2014-09 to incremental costs we incur to obtain a contract with a customer will result in us recording, as an asset as of January 1, 2018, a deferred expense of $1.2 million applicable to contracts with customers in effect as of that date. We previously reported this amount as an expense in our consolidated financial statements for periods ending on and before December 31, 2017. We estimate that we will amortize this amount to expense at the rate of approximately $186,000 per quarter beginning in 2018. The incremental costs we incur to obtain contracts with customers during 2018 and later years, and the amount of such costs we record as a deferred expense and amortize to expense in subsequent periods, will depend upon the nature and scope of our future business activities, the nature and mix of the products and services we sell, the compensation plans we have in place for our sales people, and the royalty arrangements we enter into with third parties.

Critical Accounting Policies

We follow accounting standards set by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. This board sets GAAP, which we follow in preparing consolidated financial statements that report our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and sources and uses of cash. We also follow the reporting regulations of the SEC.

Table of Contents

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the financial statements are published, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. It is possible the actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions and could have a material effect on the reported amounts of our financial position and results of operations.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary (collectively referred to as “GlobalSCAPE”, the “Company” or “we”) are prepared in conformity with GAAP. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Changes in Accounting Methods, Reclassifications and Revisions

As part of our ongoing enhancement and refinement of our financial reporting to fairly present our results of operations and financial position, we may make changes from time-to-time in accounting methods and in the classification and presentation of our business activities in our financial statements. To ensure comparability between periods, we revise previous period financial statements presented to conform them to the method of presentation in our current period financial statements. If the changes increase or decrease previously reported amounts of revenue or expenses, we adjust retained earnings as of the beginning of the earliest period presented for the cumulative effect, if any, on that balance. If these changes affect our financial statements for previously reported interim periods not presented herein, we present revised financial statements for those periods when they are reported in the future.

In preparing our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2016, we changed our method of accounting in the areas described below. We believe these new methods enhance our financial reporting. We believe these changes are not material to our financial statements taken as a whole and, as a result, believe it is not probable that the judgment of a reasonable person relying upon our previously issued financial statements would have been changed or influenced had these new methods been in place at the time those financial statements were first issued. See Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements presented in this Form 10-K/A for the impact of all of these changes on amounts previously reported in our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2015, and for the year then ended.

Amortization of Deferred Revenue Related to M&S Agreements

In previously issued financial statements, we amortized deferred revenue related to M&S agreements by recording a full month of amortization in the first month of an agreement. We used that method based on our intent to match revenue from our M&S agreements to the expense we incur when delivering M&S services. We acknowledge that the more common and widespread practice is to amortize deferred revenue based upon the specific number of days the M&S agreement is in place during that month. Both methods result in the recognition of the same amount of revenue over the term of the M&S agreement but yield differing amounts of revenue being recognized in the first month and last month of an M&S agreement.

Our consolidated statements of operations and balance sheets included herein are now prepared using the specific number of days method. This change had the effect of decreasing M&S revenue and net income on our statements of operations for 2015 and 2016 by immaterial amounts. It increased the amount of our deferred revenue on our balance sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2016, which will result in our reporting more revenue in periods subsequent to 2016 than we would have reported under the previous method. This change has no effect on the total amount of revenue we will realize from our M&S contracts.

Recording M&S Billings

We may invoice a customer for M&S to be provided commencing on a date in a month subsequent to the month in which we invoice the customer. We typically receive a purchase order from our customers for M&S prior to invoicing them, and it is not uncommon for a customer to pay us in advance of that M&S commencement date either on their own or when we request such payment. Accordingly, we previously recorded an account receivable and deferred revenue for these invoices as of the date of the invoice. We believe a reasonable, alternate and more conservative method is to wait until the commencement date of the M&S has arrived to record the account receivable and deferred revenue for any such invoices for which we have not been paid as of the balance sheet date. Accordingly, our consolidated balance sheets included herein are now prepared using that method.

Table of Contents

Reclassification of Sales Engineer Expenses

Reclassification of Reserve for Uncertain Tax Position

We maintain a reserve for uncertain tax positions. Previously, we classified that reserve as a current liability since it was not material to our consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. In assessing the materiality of this reserve as of December 31, 2016, we determined it appropriate to classify it as a component of other long term liabilities.

Revenue Recognition

We develop, market and sell software products. We recognize revenue from a sale transaction when the following conditions are met:

· Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists.

· Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered.

· The amount of the sale is fixed or determinable.

· Collection of the sale amount is reasonably assured.

For a sale transaction not meeting any one of these four criteria, we defer recognition of revenue related to that transaction until all the criteria are met.

We earn the majority of our software license revenue from software products sold under perpetual software license agreements. At the time our customers purchase these products, they typically also purchase a product maintenance and support, or M&S, agreement. These transactions are multiple element software sales for which we assess the presence of VSOE of the fair value of the undelivered elements to determine the portion of these sales to recognize as revenue upon delivery of the software product and the portion of these sales to record as deferred revenue at the time the product is delivered. We amortize the deferred revenue component to revenue in future periods as we deliver the related future services to the customer. For transactions, if any, for which we cannot establish VSOE of the fair value of the undelivered elements, we initially record the entire transaction as deferred revenue and amortize that amount to revenue in future periods as we deliver the related future services to the customer.

We provide services under M&S agreements with terms generally ranging from one to three years. We require up-front payment of our M&S fee in an amount that covers the entire term of the agreement. We record as deferred revenue amounts due or paid that relate to future periods during which we will provide the M&S service. Deferred revenue related to services we will deliver within one year is presented as a current liability while deferred revenue related to services that we will deliver more than one year into the future is presented as a non-current liability. We reduce deferred revenue and recognize revenue ratably in future periods as we deliver the M&S service.

For our products licensed and delivered under a software-as-a-service transaction on a monthly or other periodic subscription basis, we recognize subscription revenue, including initial setup fees, on a monthly basis ratably over the contractual term of the customer contract as we deliver our products and services.

We provide professional services to our customers consisting primarily of software installation support, operations support and training. We recognize revenue from these services as they are completed and accepted by our customers.

We collect sales tax on many of our sales. We do not include sales tax collected in our revenue. We record it as a liability payable to taxing authorities.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents includes all cash and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.

Table of Contents

Short Term Investments

Short-term investments consist of certificates of deposit held with financial institutions with contractual maturity dates less than one year from the balance sheet date. The Company has the intent and ability to hold these investments until their maturity dates and therefore accounts for them as held-to-maturity. These certificates of deposit are stated at amortized cost, which approximates fair value of these investments.

Long-Term Investments

Long-term investments consist of certificates of deposit held with financial institutions with contractual maturity dates greater than one year from the balance sheet date. The Company has the intent and ability to hold these investments until their maturity dates and therefore accounts for them as held-to-maturity. These certificates of deposit are stated at amortized cost, which approximates fair value of these investments.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is comprised of furniture and fixtures, software, computer equipment and leasehold improvements which are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Furniture, fixtures and equipment have a useful life of five to seven years, computer equipment and software have a useful life of three years and leasehold improvements have a useful life that is the shorter of the term of the lease under which the improvements were made or the estimated useful life of the asset.

Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred.

Goodwill

Goodwill is not amortized. On at least an annual basis, we test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level using December 31 as the measurement date. We operate as a single reporting unit.

When testing goodwill, we first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not (that is, a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that the fair value of our reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. In performing this qualitative assessment, we assess events and circumstances relevant to us including, but not limited to:

•	Macroeconomic conditions.

•	Industry and market considerations.

•	Cost factors and trends for labor and other expenses of operating our business.

•	Our overall financial performance and outlook for the future.

•	Trends in the quoted market value and trading of our common stock.

In considering these and other factors, we consider the extent to which any adverse events and circumstances identified could affect the comparison of our reporting unit’s fair value with its carrying amount. We place more weight on events and circumstances that most affect our reporting unit’s fair value or the carrying amount of our net assets. We consider positive and mitigating events and circumstances that may affect our determination of whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. We evaluate, on the basis of the weight of the evidence, the significance of all identified events and circumstances in the context of determining whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting unit is less than its carrying amount.

If, after assessing the totality of these qualitative events and circumstances, we determine it is not more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we conclude there is no impairment of goodwill and perform no further testing in accordance with GAAP. If we conclude otherwise, we proceed with performing the first step, and if necessary, the second step, of the two-step goodwill impairment test prescribed by GAAP.

As of December 31, 2016, after assessing the totality of the relevant events and circumstances, we determined it not more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting unit was less than its carrying amount. Accordingly, we concluded there was no impairment of goodwill as of that date. There have been no material events or changes in circumstances since that time indicating that the carrying amount of goodwill may exceed its fair market value and that interim testing needed to be performed.

Table of Contents

Capitalized Software Development Costs

When we complete research and development for a software product and have in place a program plan and a detailed program design or a working model of that software product, we capitalize production costs incurred for that software product from that point forward until it is ready for general release to the public. Thereafter, we amortize capitalized software production costs to expense using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of that product, which is generally three years. We periodically assess the carrying value of capitalized software development costs relative to our estimates of realizability through sales of products in the marketplace.

Cost of revenue

Cost of revenue consists of expenses associated with the production, delivery and support of the products and services we sell. Cost of license revenue consists primarily of amortization of the capitalized software development costs we incur when producing our software products, royalties we pay to use software developed by others for certain features of our products, and fees we pay to third parties who provide services supporting our SaaS and cloud-based subscription solutions. Cost of M&S revenue and cost of professional services revenue consist primarily of salaries and related costs of our employees and third parties we use to deliver these services.

Research and Development

We expense research and development costs as incurred.

Advertising Expense

We expense advertising costs as incurred as a component of our sales and marketing expenses.

Share-Based Compensation

We measure the cost of share-based payment transactions at the grant date based on the calculated fair value of the award. We recognize this cost as an expense ratably over the recipient’s requisite service period during which that award vests or becomes unrestricted.

For stock option awards, we estimate their fair value at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model considering the following factors:

•	We estimate expected volatility based on historical volatility of our common stock.

•

We use primarily the simplified method to derive an expected term which represents an estimate of the time options are expected to remain outstanding. We use this method because our options are plain-vanilla options, and we believe our historical option exercise experience is not adequately indicative of our future expectations.

•	We base the risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option on the U.S. treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

•	We estimate a dividend yield based on our historical and expected future dividend payments.

For restricted stock awards, we use the quoted price of our common stock on the grant date as the fair value of the award.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. We record deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the difference between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amount for financial reporting purposes, as measured by the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are carried on the balance sheet with the presumption that they will be realizable in future periods in which we generate taxable income.

We assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be realized from future taxable income. Based on this assessment, we provide any necessary valuation allowance on our balance sheet with a corresponding increase in the tax provision on our statement of operations. Any valuation allowances we establish are determined based upon a number of assumptions, judgments, and estimates, including forecasted earnings, future taxable income, and the relative proportions of revenue and income before taxes in the various domestic jurisdictions in which we operate.

Table of Contents

We account for uncertainty in income taxes using a two-step process to determine the amount of tax benefit to be recognized. First, we evaluate the tax position to determine the likelihood that it will be sustained upon external examination. If the tax position is deemed “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained, we assess the tax position to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The amount of the benefit we recognize is the largest amount that we believe has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Unrecognized tax benefits represent tax positions for which reserves have been established.

Earnings Per Share

We compute basic earnings per share using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the periods. We compute diluted earnings per share using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus the number of common shares that would be issued assuming conversion of all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding.

Awards of non-vested options are considered potentially dilutive common shares for the purpose of computing earnings per common share. We apply the treasury stock method to non-vested options under which the assumed proceeds include the amount the employee must pay to exercise the option plus the amount of unrecognized cost attributable to future periods less any expected tax benefits.

Results of Operations

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2016 to Year Ended December 31, 2015

	2016		2015		$ Change
	($ in thousands)
Total revenues	$	32,595	$	30,735	$	1,860
Cost of revenues		6,292		5,293		999
Gross profit		26,303		25,442		861
Operating expenses
Sales and marketing		11,558		10,431		1,127
General and administrative		6,947		6,131		816
Research and development		2,571		2,571		-
Total operating expenses		21,076		19,133		1,943
Income from operations		5,227		6,309		(1,082	)
Other income (expense), net		159		78		81
Provision for income taxes		1,801		1,861		(60	)
Net Income	$	3,585	$	4,526	$	(941	)

In the discussions below, we refer to the year ended December 31, 2016 as “2016” and the year ended December 31, 2015, as “2015”. The percentage changes cited in our discussions below are the change between 2016 and 2015.

The amounts presented for 2015 have been revised from previously reported amounts for the effects of the changes in accounting methods, reclassifications and revisions discussed above under Critical Accounting Policies and for the restatement, as discussed in Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this annual report.

Revenue. We earn revenue primarily from the following activities:

•

•	License revenue from sales of our Mail Express, WAFS and CuteFTP products that are installed at the customer’s premises under a perpetual license for which we earn the full amount of the license revenue at the time the license is delivered.

•	M&S revenue under contracts to provide ongoing product support and software updates to our customers who have purchased license software which we recognize ratably over the contractual period, which is typically one year but can be up to three years.

•	Professional services revenue from a variety of implementation, and integration services, as well as delivery of education and training associated with our solutions, which we recognize as the services are performed and accepted by the client.

Table of Contents

The components of our revenues were as follows ($ in thousands):

	Revenue for the Year Ended December 31,
	2016					2015
			Percent of					Percent of
	Amount		Total			Amount		Total

Revenue By Type
License	$	11,243		34.5	%	$	12,023		39.1	%
M&S		18,668		57.3	%		16,489		53.7	%
Professional Services (all EFT Plat)		2,684		8.2	%		2,223		7.2	%
Total Revenue	$	32,595		100.0	%	$	30,735		100.0	%

Revenue by Product Line
License
EFT Platform	$	10,237		91.1	%	$	10,459		87.0	%
Other		1,006		8.9	%		1,564		13.0	%
Total License Revenue		11,243		100.0	%		12,023		100.0	%

M&S
EFT Platform		17,432		93.4	%		15,006		91.0	%
Other		1,236		6.6	%		1,483		9.0	%
		18,668		100.0	%		16,489		100.0	%

Professional Services (all EFT Platform)		2,684		100.0	%		2,223		100.0	%

Total Revenue
EFT Platform		30,353		93.1	%		27,688		90.1	%
Other		2,242		6.9	%		3,047		9.9	%
	$	32,595		100.0	%	$	30,735		100.0	%

Our total revenue increased 6%. This increase consisted of growth in total revenue from our EFT platform products and services of $2.7 million, or 10%, offset by a decline in revenue from our other products of $805,000, or 26%. The increase in EFT Platform revenue and decrease in other product revenue was a result we expected in light of our announcement in mid-2016 that our future focus would be on our EFT platform products. At the same time, we announced that while we would continue selling our other products consisting of Mail Express, WAFS, CuteFTP, and TappIn, we would de-emphasize those products in the future, not expend future significant product development and engineering resources to enhance those products, and not dedicate significant future sales and marketing activities to them. We intend to maintain our focus on our EFT platform for the foreseeable future such that we expect to see a continuing decline in revenue from our products other than those that are part of the EFT platform.

EFT Platform Products

License revenue from our EFT platform products decreased 2.1%. This decrease was due to the cumulative effect of us expending resources in the past developing and promoting our other product lines in a manner that, over time, had diluted the focus on our EFT platform products. We believe there are long-term revenue growth opportunities in the markets for our EFT platform products. Accordingly, during the second half of 2016, we concentrated on enhancing our product development and software engineering groups dedicated to our EFT platform products which allowed us to refine our process for identifying new product opportunities, to better focus our resources on products that would yield larger and more immediate revenue opportunities, and to optimize our project management and software engineering processes to reduce the time necessary to produce new or improved products. To improve our ability to successfully sell existing EFT platform products as well as new products produced by our software engineering team, we continued to make ongoing changes in sales and marketing personnel and activities including:

·	Increasing sales staffing and capabilities as needed to address our markets.

·	Aligning our sales group to enhance its industry and geographic focus.

Table of Contents

·	Implementing new sales and marketing campaigns.

·	Evolving our lead generation programs to increase our sales staff’s exposure to potential purchasers.

·	Enhancing our support of channel partners and engaging them to sell our products through training, orientation and marketing programs.

·	Introducing new products or new versions of products related to our EFT platform as described above under Business-Software Products and Services.

Leveraging the changes to our sales and marketing activities described above toward new customers who may not have previously used our products. While sales to existing customers often consist primarily of new modules added to existing software licenses, new customers present the potential for higher license sales since they typically need to purchase a license for our core products in addition to licenses for additional modules.

The 16% increase in M&S revenue from our EFT platform products was also due to:

Ongoing license sales since a majority of license sales are accompanied by an M&S contract. The change in M&S revenue typically lags behind the related change in license revenue because license sales are recognized as revenue in full in the period the license is delivered while the related M&S revenue is recognized in future periods as those services are delivered.

·	Sustaining high renewal rates of M&S contracts by customers who initially purchased these services in earlier periods. We believe these renewals result from our programs designed to provide high-quality and responsive M&S services to our customers.

The 21% increase in professional services revenue was primarily due to an enhanced focus on managing our queue of professional services projects to be delivered which resulted in a reduction in our backlog of professional services related to earlier EFT platform license sales.

When we sell our licensed products, we also typically create a recurring revenue stream from M&S since almost all purchasers of our licensed products also purchase an M&S contract. In general, and depending upon the level of M&S a customer purchases, this recurring revenue stream is 20% to 30% per year of the price of the underlying software license to which the M&S relates.

Our M&S contracts are typically for one year, with some customers buying two or three year contracts. The customer pays us the M&S fee for the entire term of the agreement at the time the contract begins. We recognize that amount as revenue ratably in future periods over the term of the contract.

We typically experience a high renewal rate for M&S services for our enterprise products so long as a customer continues using the licensed product they purchased from us. As a result, growing license revenue not only contributes to increasing revenue growth at the time the license is sold but also provides a foundation for future recurring revenue as the purchasers of our licensed products continually renew M&S agreements to support their ongoing product support needs. This pattern of activity can create a cumulative effect for M&S renewals as a result of the cumulative number of licensed software installations sold over multiple years that create M&S renewals in any single year predictably (and in line with our expectations) exceeding the number of new software licenses we sell in a single year. We expect this cumulative effect to continue to grow if we continue to increase enterprise software license revenue in future periods.

EFT platform license revenue as a percent of our total EFT platform revenue was 34% in 2016 compared to 38% in 2015. This decrease was due to the continuing accumulation of our recurring M&S revenue stream from prior license sales, the reduction of our backlog of professional services, and lower than expected license sales during the first half of 2016 which caused us to change our strategy to focus the substantial part of our resources on our EFT platform products.

Other Products

In mid-2016, we announced that our future focus would be on our EFT platform products. At the same time, we announced that while we would continue selling our other products consisting of Mail Express, WAFS, CuteFTP, and TappIn, we would de-emphasize in the future these stand-alone products that are not part of our EFT platform. Accordingly, during the second half of 2016, we curtailed our product development and engineering resources for these products and significantly reduced our sales and marketing activities supporting them. As a result, our license and M&S revenue from those products collectively declined 26%. Our future focus will be on our EFT platform such that we expect to see a continuing decline in revenue from these other products although we do expect them to continue to produce a modest contribution margin that contributes to our future profitability.

Table of Contents

Cost of Revenues.

These expenses are associated with the production, delivery and support of our products and services. We believe it most meaningful to view cost of revenues as a percent of the revenues to which those costs relate since many of those costs are variable relative to revenue.

Cost of license revenue consists primarily of:

·	Amortization of capitalized software development costs we incur when producing our software products. This amortization begins when a product is ready for general release to the public.

·	Royalties we pay to use software developed by others for certain features of our products.

·	Fees we pay to third parties who provide services supporting our SaaS and cloud-based subscription solutions.

Cost of M&S revenue and cost of professional services revenue consist primarily of salaries and related costs of our employees and third parties we use to deliver these services.

Cost of revenue for software licenses as a percent of software license revenue was 27% in 2016 compared to 20% in 2015. This increase was primarily the result of our release of new software products and new versions of existing products during the second half of 2015 and the resulting commencement of amortization of the capitalized software development costs for those products. This additional amortization expense occurred only during a portion of 2015 but was in place for all of 2016 thereby resulting in the total amortization expense for 2016 exceeding the total amortization expense for 2015.

Cost of revenue for M&S as a percent of M&S revenue was substantially unchanged. Cost of revenue for M&S in absolute dollars increased by 5% due to an increase in M&S revenue. The cost of delivering M&S can vary slightly up or down from period-to-period, but we believe such changes are typically not indicative of long term trends or permanent changes in our cost of delivering M&S. Our gross margin on these services generally remains greater than 90% as a result of a consistent application of our customer support delivery protocols and practices

Cost of revenue for professional services as a percent of professional services revenue was 63% in 2016 and 2015. This steady percentage is expected in light of the level of effort required to deliver these services remaining comparable between years.

Sales and Marketing.

We believe it most meaningful to view cost of sales and marketing as a percent of revenues since many of those costs, particularly sales commissions, are variable relative to revenue. These expenses were 35% of total revenue for 2016 compared to 34% of total revenue for 2015, which is consistent with our expectation that these expenses as a percent of revenue would remain relatively constant. In absolute dollars these expenses increased 11%. These variations were primarily due to:

·	Increasing the size of our sales, marketing and product strategy teams and increased compensation rates due to competitive demands in the marketplace.

·	Increasing marketing activities related to competitive intelligence and channel development.

·	An increase in revenue which resulted in a higher absolute dollar amount of sales commissions paid to employees although the commission rate as a percent of sales did not change materially.

Research and Development. The overall profile of our research and development activities was as follows (in thousands):

	Year ending December 31,
	2016		2015
R&D expenditures capitalized	$	1,538	$	1,967
R&D expenditures expensed		2,571		2,571
Total R&D expenditures	$	4,109	$	4,538

Table of Contents

While the scope and magnitude of our software development activities measured in hours of effort has continued to grow between these periods, the cost of performing that work decreased 9% in 2016 compared to 2015 due to:

·	Increased use of our employees as an internal resource to do this work in 2016 compared to 2015 when we relied more on the use of higher cost, third-party software developers.

·	Enhancement of relationships with third-party developers we continued to use by replacing legacy arrangements carrying higher costs with more cost effective and efficient arrangements.

·	Shortages of qualified software engineers and qualified technical personnel that caused some of our open positions that arise during the normal course of business to take longer to fill.

Total resources expended for R&D set forth above as total R&D expenditures serves to illustrate our total corporate efforts to improve our existing products and to develop new products regardless of whether or not our expenditures for those efforts were expensed or capitalized. Total resources expended for R&D is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered a substitute for R&D expense (set forth above as R&D expenditures expenses) and capitalized software development costs (set forth above as R&D expenditures capitalized) individually. While we believe the non-GAAP, total resources expended for R&D amount provides useful supplemental information regarding our overall corporate product improvement and new product creation activities, there are limitations associated with the use of this non-GAAP measurement. Total resources expended for R&D is a non-GAAP measure not prepared in accordance with GAAP and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies since there is no standard for preparing this non-GAAP measure. As a result, this non-GAAP measure of total resources expended for R&D has limitations and should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, R&D expense and capitalized software development costs individually.

General and Administrative.

These expenses increased 13%. This increase was primarily due to:

Costs associated with the resignation or our chief executive officer in 2016 for which there was not a comparable event in 2015. The severance arrangement related to this resignation in May 2016 provided for continued payment of his salary throughout 2016. It also included a modification of certain stock options held by him to accelerate their vesting and to extend the period during which they can be exercised which resulted in a one-time, non-recurring share-based compensation expense being recorded in 2016.

·	Increased legal expenses primarily resulting from costs to defend ourselves against a patent infringement claim which has been settled. See Item 3. Legal Proceedings for more information.

Other Income.

Other income increased from $82,000 to $159,000 due to enhanced investment of our cash in higher yielding investments during 2016 as compared to 2015.

Income Taxes.

Our effective tax rate was 33% for 2016 and 29% for 2015. These rates differed from a federal statutory tax rate of 34% primarily due to:

·	The domestic production activities deduction taken on our federal income tax return that is not an expense for financial statement purposes.

·	Research and development tax credits.

Offset by:

·	Certain expenses in our consolidated financial statements, such as a portion of meals and entertainment expenses, that are not deductible on our federal income tax return.

·	State income taxes included in income tax expense in our consolidated financial statements.

Our effective tax rate for 2015 was lower than our effective tax rate for 2016 due to the research and development tax credit provided in our 2014 consolidated financial statements being less than the amount of that credit ultimately claimed on our 2014 federal income tax return. This resulted from additional factors affecting the credit becoming known to us at the time the 2014 federal tax return was prepared. We recorded the difference between those amounts in our 2015 consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ending December 31, 2016 and 2015

Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	64

Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets	65
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income	66
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	67
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	68
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	69

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

of GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. and its subsidiary (collectively, the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have nor were we engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. and its subsidiary as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements, the 2016 and 2015 consolidated financial statements have been restated to correct misstatements in the previously issued consolidated financial statements.

As discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company is involved in litigation and regulatory matters. The Company intends to vigorously defend against these matters. However, at this time, the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome and/or the scope of any potential loss. Accordingly, no provision for any liability that may result has been made in the consolidated financial statements. Should the Company ultimately be found liable, the resulting outcome could have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, liquidity or the results of its operations. Our opinion is not modified with respect to these matters.

/s/ WEAVER AND TIDWELL, L.L.P.

Austin, Texas

June 14, 2018

Table of Contents

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets - As Restated
(in thousands except share amounts)

	December 31,
	2016			2015
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,895		$	15,885
Short term investments		2,754			3,254
Accounts receivable, net		6,288			5,938
Federal income tax receivable		292			545
Prepaid expenses		531			511
Total current assets		18,760			26,133

Long term investments		12,779			-
Property and equipment, net		456			498
Capitalized software development costs, net		3,743			3,982
Goodwill		12,712			12,712
Deferred tax asset		1,050			940
Other assets		245			60
Total assets	$	49,745		$	44,325

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	930		$	839
Accrued expenses		1,603			1,893
Deferred revenue		13,655			12,460
Total current liabilities		16,188			15,192

Deferred revenue, non-current portion		3,790			3,808
Other long term liabilities		152			134
Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, 10,000,000 authorized, no shares issued or outstanding		-			-
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 40,000,000 authorized, 21,920,912 and 21,303,467 shares issued at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively		22			21
Additional paid-in capital		21,756			19,647
Treasury stock, 403,581 shares, at cost, at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015		(1,452	)		(1,452	)
Retained earnings		9,289			6,975
Total stockholders’ equity		29,615			25,191
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	49,745		$	44,325

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income - As Restated
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2016		2015

Operating revenues:
Software licenses	$	11,243	$	12,023
Maintenance and support		18,668		16,489
Professional services		2,684		2,223
Total revenues		32,595		30,735
Costs of revenues
Software licenses		3,071		2,428
Maintenance and support		1,537		1,470
Professional services		1,684		1,395
Total costs of revenues		6,292		5,293
Gross Profit		26,303		25,442
Operating expenses
Sales and marketing		11,558		10,431
General and administrative		6,947		6,131
Research and development		2,571		2,571
Total operating expenses		21,076		19,133
Income from operations		5,227		6,309
Other income (expense), net:
Interest expense				(4	)
Interest income		159		82
Total other income (expense), net		159		78
Income before income taxes		5,386		6,387
Provision for income taxes		1,801		1,861
Net income	$	3,585	$	4,526
Comprehensive income	$	3,585	$	4,526

Net income per common share - basic	$	0.17	$	0.22

Net income per common share - diluted	$	0.17	$	0.21

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		21,126		20,824

Diluted		21,677		21,366

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity - As Restated
(in thousands, except number of shares)

						Additional
	Common Stock					Paid-in			Treasury			Retained
	Shares			Amount		Capital			Stock			Earnings			Total


Balance at December 31, 2014 As Originally Filed		20,989,267		$	21	$	18,370		$	(1,452	)	$	3,889		$	20,828

Restatement		(80,000	)										(500	)		(500	)

As Restated		20,909,267			21		18,370			(1,452	)		3,389			20,328

Shares issued upon exercise of stock options		314,200					508									508

Tax (deficiency) from stock-based compensation							58									58

Stock-based compensation expense
Stock options							464									464
Restricted stock		80,000					247									247

Common stock cash dividends													(940	)		(940	)

Net income													4,526			4,526

Balance at December 31, 2015		21,303,467		$	21	$	19,647		$	(1,452	)	$	6,975		$	25,191

Shares issued upon exercise of stock options		537,445			1		1,119									1,120

Tax benefit (deficiency) from stock-based compensation							(24	)								(24	)

Stock-based compensation expense
Stock options							741									741
Restricted stock		80,000					273									273

Common stock cash dividends													(1,271	)		(1,271	)

Net income													3,585			3,585

Balance at December 31, 2016		21,920,912		$	22	$	21,756		$	(1,452	)	$	9,289		$	29,615

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - As Restated
(in thousands)

	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2016			2015
Operating Activities:
Net income	$	3,585		$	4,526
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Bad debt expense		182			(7	)
Depreciation and amortization		2,045			1,553
Stock-based compensation		1,014			711
Deferred taxes		(110	)		(248	)
Excess tax deficiency from exercise of share based compensation		24			(58	)
Subtotal before changes in operating assets and liabilities		6,740			6,477
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(532	)		7
Prepaid expenses		(20	)		(23	)
Federal income taxes		229			(233	)
Accrued interest receivable		(163	)		(69	)
Other assets		(185	)		40
Accounts payable		91			(272	)
Accrued expenses		(290	)		303
Deferred revenues		1,177			708
Other long-term liabilities		18			82
Net cash provided by operating activities		7,065			7,020
Investing Activities:
Software development costs		(1,538	)		(1,967	)
Purchase of property and equipment		(226	)		(152	)
Purchase of certificates of deposit		(12,116	)		-
Net cash (used in) investing activities		(13,880	)		(2,119	)
Financing Activities:
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		1,120			508
Tax deficiency (benefit) from stock-based compensation		(24	)		58
Dividends paid		(1,271	)		(940	)
Net cash (used in) financing activities		(175	)		(374	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash		(6,990	)		4,527
Cash at beginning of period		15,885			11,358
Cash at end of period	$	8,895		$	15,885

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	-		$	-
Income taxes	$	1,638		$	2,146

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2016 and 2015

1. Nature of Business and Corporate Structure

We provide secure information exchange capabilities for enterprises and consumers through the development and distribution of software, delivery of managed and hosted solutions, and provisioning of associated services. Our solution portfolio facilitates transmission of critical information such as financial data, medical records, customer files, vendor files, personnel files, transaction activity, and other similar documents between diverse and geographically separated network infrastructures while supporting a range of information protection approaches to meet privacy and other security requirements. In addition to enabling secure, flexible transmission of critical information using servers, desktop and notebook computers, and a wide range of network-enabled mobile devices, our products also provide customers with the ability to monitor and audit file transfer activities. Our primary product is Enhanced File Transfer, or EFT. We have other products that complement our EFT product.

Throughout these notes unless otherwise noted, our references to 2016 and 2015 refer to the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

We follow accounting standards set by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. This board sets GAAP, which we follow in preparing financial statements that report our financial position, results of operations, and sources and uses of cash. We also follow the reporting regulations of the SEC.

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the financial statements are published, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of our financial statements. It is possible the actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions and could have a material effect on the reported amounts of our financial position and results of operations.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary (collectively referred to as the “Company” or “we”) are prepared in conformity with GAAP. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Changes in Accounting Methods, Reclassifications and Revisions

Method of Amortization of Deferred Revenue Related to M&S Agreements

Table of Contents

We have changed our method of amortizing deferred revenue related to M&S agreements such that our consolidated statements of operations and balance sheets included herein are now prepared using the specific number of days method. This change had the effect of decreasing M&S revenue and net income on our consolidated statements of operations for 2016 and 2015 by immaterial amounts. It increased the amount of our deferred revenue on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, which will result in us reporting more revenue in periods subsequent to 2016 than we would have reported under the previous method. This change has no effect on the total amount of revenue we will realize from our M&S contracts.

Method of Recording M&S Billings

Reclassification of Sales Engineer Expenses

We employ sales engineers who assist our sales staff in addressing technical considerations by our customers prior to them purchasing our product. Our use of sales engineers has expanded in recent quarters. Prior to 2016, we classified the expense of sales engineers as part of costs of revenue – professional services. We believe these expenses are now more appropriately classified as part of sales and marketing expense and have now classified them as such. This change has the effect of decreasing cost of revenue – professional services and increasing sales and marketing expense. It does not affect any of our reported amounts of revenue or net income.

Reclassification of Reserve for Uncertain Tax Position

As described in Note 9, we maintain a reserve for uncertain tax positions. Previously, we classified that reserve as a current liability since it was not material to our consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. In assessing the materiality of this reserve as of December 31, 2016, we determined it appropriate to classify it as a component of other long term liabilities. This change has the effect of decreasing current income taxes payable and increasing other long term liabilities.

With respect to the above items, we have restated our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2015, and for the year then ended. See Note 15 for the impact of all the adjustments to our consolidated financial statements in our Original Filing to correct those consolidated financial statements for the effects of the adjustments described above.

Revenue Recognition

We develop, market and sell software products. We recognize revenue from a sale transaction when the following conditions are met:

· Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists.

· Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered.

· The amount of the sale is fixed or determinable.

· Collection of the sale amount is reasonably assured.

For a sale transaction not meeting any one of these four criteria, we defer recognition of revenue related to that transaction until all the criteria are met.

Table of Contents

We collect sales tax on many of our sales. We do not include sales tax collected in our revenue. We record it as a liability payable to taxing authorities.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents includes all cash and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.

Short Term Investments

Long-Term Investments

Property and Equipment

Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred.

Table of Contents

Goodwill

Goodwill is not amortized. On at least an annual basis, we test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level using December 31 as the measurement date. We operate as a single reporting unit.

•	Macroeconomic conditions.

•	Industry and market considerations.

•	Cost factors and trends for labor and other expenses of operating our business.

•	Our overall financial performance and outlook for the future.

•	Trends in the quoted market value and trading of our common stock.

Capitalized Software Development Costs

Cost of revenue

Research and Development

We expense research and development costs as incurred.

Table of Contents

Advertising Expense

We expense advertising costs as incurred as a component of our sales and marketing expenses. Advertising expense was approximately $1.9 million and $1.6 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Share-Based Compensation

For stock option awards, we estimate their fair value at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model considering the following factors:

•	We estimate expected volatility based on historical volatility of our common stock.

•

•	We base the risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option on the U.S. treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

•	We estimate a dividend yield based on our historical and expected future dividend payments.

For restricted stock awards, we use the quoted price of our common stock on the grant date as the fair value of the award.

Income Taxes

Earnings Per Share

Table of Contents

Recent accounting pronouncements

ASU 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (issued January 2017) - To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, Step 2 was eliminated from the goodwill impairment test. In computing the implied fair value of goodwill under Step 2, an entity had to perform procedures to determine the fair value at the impairment testing date of its assets and liabilities (including unrecognized assets and liabilities) following the procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Instead, under the amendments in this update, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. Any loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Additionally, an entity should consider income tax effects from any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable. This update also eliminated the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and, if it fails that qualitative test, to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. Therefore, the same impairment assessment applies to all reporting units. An entity is required to disclose the amount of goodwill allocated to each reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount of net assets. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. A public business entity that is a SEC filer is required to adopt the amendments in this update for its annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. We expect that the application of the provisions of this update will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2016-02, Leases (issued February 2016). The main difference between existing GAAP and this ASU 2016-02 is the presentation by lessees on their financial statements of lease assets and lease liabilities arising from operating leases. Since this new standard retains the distinction between finance and operating leases, the effect of leases in the statement of operations and the statement of cash flows will be largely unchanged from existing GAAP. Our only lease of significance is our operating lease for our corporate office space for which we will present a right-to-use asset and a lease liability on our balance sheet when we implement this standard. We are in the process of determining those amounts. In accordance with this standard, we will implement it beginning with our interim and annual financial statements for 2019. The extent of the effect of this standard on our consolidated financial statements for 2019 and later will depend upon the leases, if any, that we have in effect at that date.

Table of Contents

·	If these costs are associated with products and services for which we recognize revenue at a point in time (primarily sales of perpetual software licenses and professional services), we will expense these costs in full at the time we recognize that revenue.

o	For the portion of the cost that we determine benefits us primarily only over the term of the specific underlying contract currently in force (such as the term of an M&S contract), we will recognize expense ratably each month over that term.

Our application of ASU 2014-09 to incremental costs we incur to obtain a contract with a customer will result in us recording, as an asset as of January 1, 2018, a deferred expense of approximately $1.2 million applicable to contracts with customers in effect as of that date. We previously reported this amount as an expense in our financial statements for periods ending on and before December 31, 2017. We estimate that we will amortize this amount to expense at the rate of approximately $186,000 per quarter beginning in 2018. The incremental costs we incur to obtain contracts with customers during 2018 and later years, and the amount of such costs we record as a deferred expense and amortize to expense in subsequent periods, will depend upon the nature and scope of our future business activities, the nature and mix of the products and services we sell, the compensation plans we have in place for our sales people, and the royalty arrangements we enter into with third parties.

Table of Contents

3. Accounts Receivable, Net

We bill our customers and issue them an invoice when we have delivered our goods or services to them. In addition, when our customers agree to purchase or renew M&S services, we bill and invoice our customers at that time which could be before the date we begin delivering those services. In that event, we exclude from accounts receivable (and from the related deferred revenue, see Note 6) the invoices we have issued for which the M&S services commencement date is in the future and which have not been paid by the customer as of the date of our consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, we determine our accounts receivable as follows ($ in thousands):

	December 31,
	2016			2015
Total invoices issued and unpaid	$	6,932		$	6,407
Less: Unpaid invoices relating to M&S contracts with a start date subsequent to the balance sheet date		(381	)		(206	)
Gross accounts receivable		6,551			6,201
Allowance for sales returns and doubtful accounts		(263	)		(263	)
Accounts receivable, net	$	6,288		$	5,938

The activity in our allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns has been as follows ($ in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015
Balance, beginning of period	$	263		$	511
Provision for doubtful accounts and sales returns		182			(7	)
Accounts written off		(182	)		(241	)
Balance, end of period	$	263		$	263

4. Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment, at cost, consists of the following ($ in thousands):

	December 31,
	2016			2015
Furniture and fixtures	$	636		$	620
Software		651			638
Equipment		1,411			1,218
Leasehold improvements		559			559
		3,257			3,035
Less accumulated depreciation		(2,801	)		(2,537	)
Property and equipment, net	$	456		$	498

Table of Contents

5. Capitalized Software Development Costs, Net

Our capitalized software development costs balances and activity is as follows: ($ in thousands):

	December 31,
	2016			2015
Gross capitalized cost	$	7,252		$	5,714
Accumulated amortization		(3,509	)		(1,732	)
Net balance	$	3,743		$	3,982

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015
Amount capitalized	$	1,538		$	1,967
Amortization expense	$	(1,777	)	$	(1,283	)

	Released			Unreleased
	Products			Products

Gross capitalized amount at December 31, 2016	$	6,171		$	1,081
Accumulated amortization	$	(3,509	)	$	-
Net balance	$	2,662		$	1,081

Future amortization expense for
the year ending December 31,
2017	$	1,589
2018		856
2019		217
Total	$	2,662

The future amortization expense of the gross capitalized software development costs related to unreleased products will be determinable at a future date when those products are ready for general release to the public.

6. Deferred Revenue

As described in Note 3 regarding accounts receivable, when our customers agree to purchase or renew M&S services, we bill and invoice our customers at that time which could be before the date we begin delivering those services. In that event, we exclude from deferred revenue (and from the related accounts receivable) the invoices we have issued for which the M&S services commencement date is in the future and which have not been paid by the customer as of the date of our financial statements. Accordingly, we determine our deferred revenue as follows ($ in thousands):

	December 31,
	2016			2015
Total invoiced for M&S contracts for which revenue will be recognized in future periods	$	17,826		$	16,474
Less: Unpaid invoices relating to M&S agreements with a start date subsequent to the balance sheet date		(381	)		(206	)
Total deferred revenue	$	17,445		$	16,268

Deferred revenue, current portion	$	13,655		$	12,460
Deferred revenue, non-current portion		3,790			3,808
Total deferred revenue	$	17,445		$	16,268

Table of Contents

7. Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

We have an operating lease related to our office space. Minimum rental commitments under operating leases at December 31, 2016, are as follows ($ in thousands):

Year Ending December 31,
2017	$	360
2018		360
2019		120
Total	$	840

Rent expense under operating leases was $347,000 in both 2016 and 2015. We had a deferred rent liability of $31,000 at December 31, 2016, which we amortize to rent expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the applicable lease.

Severance Payments

We have agreements with key personnel that provide for severance payments to them in the event of a change in control of the Company, as defined in those agreements, and their employment is terminated in connection with that change in control. In such event, our aggregate severance payments to those employees would be approximately $1.9 million.

Legal and Regulatory Matters

As previously disclosed in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 15, 2017, on August 9, 2017, a securities class action complaint, Anthony Giovagnoli v. GlobalSCAPE, Inc., et. al., Case No. 5:17-cv-00753, was filed against the Company in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The complaint names as defendants the Company, Matthew Goulet, and James Albrecht for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements regarding, inter alia, the Company’s previously reported financial statements. The complaint alleges violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The complaint seeks unspecified damages, costs, attorneys’ fees, and equitable relief. On November 6, 2017, the Court appointed a lead plaintiff, who has agreed to file an amended complaint following the completion of the Restatement. Management intends to vigorously defend against this action. At this time, the Company cannot predict how the courts will rule on the merits of the claims and/or the scope of the potential loss in the event of an adverse outcome. Should the Company ultimately be found liable, the resulting damages could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, liquidity, or results of our operations.

The Board has established a special litigation committee (“Special Litigation Committee”) consisting of Thomas Hicks and Frank Morgan to analyze and investigate claims that could potentially be asserted in stockholder derivative litigation related to facts connected to the claims and allegations asserted in the litigation related to the Restatement and the Section 220 Demand (the “Potential Derivative Litigation”). The Special Litigation Committee will determine what actions are appropriate and in the best interests of the Company, and decide whether it is in the best interests of the Company to pursue, dismiss, or consensually resolve any claims that may be asserted in the Potential Derivative Litigation. The Board determined that each member of the Special Litigation Committee is disinterested and independent with respect to the Potential Derivative Litigation. Among other things, the Special Litigation Committee has the power to retain counsel and advisors, as appropriate, to assist it in the investigation, to gather and review relevant documents relating to the claims, to interview persons who may have knowledge of the relevant information, to prepare a report setting forth its conclusions and recommended course of action with respect to the Potential Derivative Litigation, and to take any actions, including, without limitation, directing the filing and prosecution of litigation on behalf of the Company, as the Special Litigation Committee in its sole discretion deems to be in the best interests of the Company in connection with the Potential Derivative Litigation. The Special Litigation Committee’s findings and determinations shall be final and not subject to review by the Board and in all respects shall be binding upon the Company.

Table of Contents

8. Stock Options, Restricted Stock and Share-Based Compensation

We have stock-based compensation plans under which we have granted, and may grant in the future, incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, and restricted stock to employees and non-employee members of the Board of Directors. Our share-based compensation expense was as follows ($ in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016		2015
Share-based compensation expense	$	1,014	$	711

Stock Options

We have stock options outstanding under long-term equity incentive plans that originated in 2000, 2010 and 2016. During 2015, we granted stock options only under the 2010 plan. In 2016, we granted stock options under the 2010 plan for most of the year until we reached the cumulative number of shares for which options could be granted under that plan since its inception, which was three million shares. Thereafter, we began granting stock options under a plan originating in 2016 that was approved by our Board of Directors and that is subject to approval by our stockholders at their next annual meeting.

Provisions and characteristics of all of our long-term equity incentive plans include the following:

·	The exercise price, term and other conditions applicable to each stock option or stock award granted are determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

·	The exercise price of stock options is set on the grant date and may not be less than the fair market value per share of our stock at market close on that date.

·	Stock options we issue generally become exercisable ratably over a three-year period, expire ten years from the date of grant, and are exercisable for a period of ninety days after the end of employment.

·	Upon exercise of a stock option, we issue new shares from the shares of common stock we are authorized to issue.

Subsequent to 2016, we will issue stock-based awards only under the 2016 plan which authorizes the issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock for stock-based incentives including stock options and restricted stock awards. As of December 31, 2016, stock based incentives for up to 4,972,000 shares remained available for issuance in the future under this plan.

We have not previously issued any restricted stock under any of these plans.

Table of Contents

Our stock option activity has been as follows:

				Weighted		Weighted Average
				Average		Remaining		Aggregate
	Number of			Exercise		Contractual		Intrinsic
	Shares			Price		Terms		Value
						(Years)		(000’s)
Outstanding at December 31, 2014		2,022,175		$	2.12		6.07	$	710

2015
Granted		538,000		$	3.21
Forfeitures		(154,650	)	$	2.49
Exercised		(314,200	)	$	1.61
Outstanding at December 31, 2015		2,091,325		$	2.45		6.09	$	3,281

2016
Granted		1,257,300		$	3.58
Forfeitures		(404,175	)	$	3.14
Exercised		(537,445	)	$	2.08
Outstanding at December 31, 2016		2,407,005		$	3.00		7.19	$	2,574

Exercisable at December 31, 2016		1,001,570		$	2.34		4.55	$	1,733

Additional information about our stock options is as follows:

	2016		2015
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year	$	1.64	$	1.60
Intrinsic value of options exercised during the year	$	880,064	$	532,224
Cash received from stock options exercised during the year	$	1,118,177	$	507,289

Number of options that vested during the year		348,116		307,494
Fair value of options that vested during the year	$	528,728	$	385,784

Unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested options at end of year	$	1,768,344	$	891,854
Weighted average years over which non-vested option expense will be recognized		2.17		2.01

As of December 31, 2016
				Options Outstanding				Options Exercisable
				Weighted
				Average		Weighted				Weighted
		Underlying		Remaining		Average		Number of		Average
Range of		Shares		Contractual		Exercise		Underlying		Exercise
Exercise Prices		Outstanding		Life		Price		Shares		Price
$	0.85 - $1.43		116,600		3.36	$	1.04		116,600	$	1.04
$	1.47 - $2.32		459,745		4.89	$	1.83		457,065	$	1.83
$	2.34 - $3.52		1,172,660		8.13	$	3.22		295,265	$	2.87
$	3.53 - $4.21		658,000		7.79	$	3.78		132,640	$	4.10
Total options			2,407,005						1,001,570

Table of Contents

We used the following assumptions to determine compensation expense for our stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015
Expected volatility		55	%		61	%
Expected annual dividend yield		1.5	%		1.5	%
Risk free rate of return		1.45	%		1.58	%
Expected option term (years)		6.00			6.00

In connection with the departure of one of our executive officers in 2016, we modified stock options previously granted to him to extend the period during which those options could be exercised after the end of his employment. This modification extended that period beyond ninety days after the end of his employment to December 31, 2016. As a result of this modification, we recorded additional share-based compensation expense of $108,000 in 2016.

Restricted Stock Awards

In May 2015, we adopted the 2015 Non-Employee Directors Long Term Incentive Plan (“2015 Directors Plan”). This plan provides for the issuance of either stock options or restricted stock awards for up to 500,000 shares of our common stock. Provisions and characteristics of this plan include the following:

·	The exercise price, term and other conditions applicable to each stock option or stock award granted are determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

Restricted stock awards are initially issued as restricted shares with a legend restricting transferability of the shares until the recipient satisfies the vesting provision of the award, which is generally continuing service for one year subsequent to the date of the award, after which time the restrictive legend is removed from the shares.

·	Restricted shares participate in dividend payments and may be voted.

·	As of December 31, 2016, stock based incentives for up to 340,000 shares remained available for issuance in the future under this plan.

Our restricted stock awards activity has been as follows:

						Total
				Grant Date		Fair Value of
	Number of			Fair Value		Shares That
	Shares			Per Share		Vested
Restricted Shares Outstanding at December 31, 2014		80,000		$	2.32

2015
Shares granted with restrictions		80,000		$	3.34
Shares vested and restrictions removed		(80,000	)	$	2.32	$	267,200
Restricted Shares Outstanding at December 31, 2015		80,000		$	3.34

2016
Shares granted with restrictions		80,000		$	3.31
Shares vested and restrictions removed		(80,000	)	$	3.34	$	276,000
Restricted Shares Outstanding at December 31, 2016		80,000		$	3.31

We have not issued any stock options under the 2015 Directors Plan.

The 2015 Directors Plan replaced the 2006 Non-Employee Directors Long Term Incentive Plan. We will not issue any additional stock or stock options under the 2006 plan.

At December 31, 2016, we had $90,437 of unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock awards. We expect to recognize that expense in the future over a weighted-average period of four months.

Table of Contents

9. Income Taxes

The components of our income tax expense (benefit) are as follows ($ in thousands):

	2016							2015
	Current		Deferred			Total		Current		Deferred			Total
Federal	$	1,732	$	(92	)		1,640	$	2,008	$	(244	)	$	1,764
State		179		(18	)		161		101		(4	)		97
Total	$	1,911	$	(110	)	$	1,801	$	2,109	$	(248	)	$	1,861

Deferred income taxes on our consolidated balance sheet reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows ($ in thousands):

	As of December 31,
	2016			2015
Deferred tax assets:
Deferred revenue	$	1,229		$	1,154
Capital loss carryforward		1,099			1,099
Share-based compensation		578			677
Compensation and benefits		278			168
Texas franchise tax R&D credit		153			-
Allowance for doubtful accounts		114			111
Net operating loss carryforward		91			151
Other		56			33
Less valuation allowances:
Capital loss carryforward		(1,099	)		(1,099	)
Texas franchise tax R&D credit		(153	)		-
Total deferred tax assets		2,346			2,294

Deferred tax liabilities:
Intangible assets		1,289			1,339
Depreciation		7			15
Total gross deferred tax liabilities		1,296			1,354

Net deferred tax assets	$	1,050		$	940

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more-likely-than-not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized. Our assessment of the likelihood of having sufficient taxable income in the future to support deduction or utilization of the items giving rise to our deferred tax assets indicates it is more-likely-than-not that we will realize the deferred tax assets listed in the table above.

As of December 31, 2016, we had federal income tax net operating loss carryforwards of $268,000 available to offset future federal taxable income, if any. These carryforwards became available through our acquisition of TappIn, Inc. in 2011. These carryforwards expire in 2030 and 2031.

As of December 31, 2016, we had federal income tax capital loss carryforwards of $3,231,000 which resulted from the reduction of our investments in and notes receivable from CoreTrace Corporation in 2012. We can realize capital loss carryforwards to the extent we have capital gains in future periods against which this capital loss can be deducted. We believe it uncertain that we will have sufficient capital gains in the future to support this deduction and, accordingly, have provided a valuation allowance for the full amount of this carryforward. This carryforward expires in 2017.

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2016, we had Texas franchise tax research and development activities credit carryforwards of $153,000. We can realize these tax credit carryforwards to the extent we have sufficient Texas franchise tax in future years. We believe it uncertain that we will have sufficient Texas Franchise Tax in the future to support utilization of these credits and, accordingly, have provided a valuation allowance for the full amount of this carryforward. These carryforwards expire in 2034 through 2036.

We claim research and experimentation tax credits, or R&D tax credits, on certain of our tax returns and have included the effect of those credits in our provision for income taxes. A routine examination of our 2008, 2009 and 2010 federal income tax returns conducted and completed by the Internal Revenue Service in 2015 resulted in the amount of the R&D tax credits allowed for those years being less than the amounts we claimed on those federal income tax returns. If the Internal Revenue Service examines our federal income tax returns for 2011 and later years, we believe they may apply their same criteria to the R&D tax credits we claimed on those tax returns. Accordingly, we believe it more-likely-than-not that the R&D tax credit allowed for those years may be less than the amounts we have claimed. As a result, we maintain a reserve for an uncertain tax position for this matter in the amount of $120,000 as of December 31, 2016.

The aggregate changes in the balance of our gross unrecognized tax benefits were as follows ($ in thousands):

	2016		2015
Balance, beginning of year	$	90	$	125
Increases for tax positions related to the current year		22		25
Increases for tax positions related to prior years		9		23
Decreases for tax positions related to prior years		-		(51	)
Decreases due to settlements related to prior years		-		(32	)
Balance, end of year	$	121	$	90

We believe it reasonably possible that we will not recognize any of our unrecognized tax benefits during 2017. If we realized and recognized any of our gross unrecognized tax benefits, such benefits would reduce our effective tax rate in the year of recognition.

We are subject to taxation in the United States and in multiple state jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2016, our federal income tax returns for 2015, 2014 and 2013 are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. Our amended federal income tax returns for 2012 and 2011 are subject to examination with the amount of any claim for payment of additional taxes limited to the amount by which the tax due on those amended returns was less than the tax due on the returns for those years as originally filed. Our state tax returns are subject to examination for varying periods of time by numerous state taxing authorities. Currently, none of our federal or state income tax returns are under examination.

To the extent they arise, we record interest and penalty expenses related to income taxes as components of other expense in our statement of operations. We incurred no such expenses in 2016 or 2015.

Our income tax expense reconciles to an income tax expense resulting from applying an assumed statutory federal income rate of 34% to income before income taxes as follows ($ in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015
Income tax expense at federal statutory rate	$	1,831		$	2,172

Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:
State taxes, net of federal benefit		100			62
Incentive stock options		55			-
R&D tax credit uncertain tax position (net)		31			(35	)
Research and development credit		(176	)		(251	)
Domestic production activities deduction		(64	)		(136	)
Other		24			49
Income tax expense per the statement of operations	$	1,801		$	1,861

Table of Contents

The U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (The Tax Reform Act) was enacted on December 22, 2017. This legislation significantly changes U.S. tax law by, among other things, lowering corporate income tax rates. The Tax Reform Act permanently reduces the U.S. corporate tax rate from a maximum of 35% to a flat 21% rate effective January 1, 2018. The main impact of the Tax Reform Act on our 2017 consolidated financial statements is the re-measurement of our deferred tax balances at December 31, 2017 from the old corporate tax rate to the new corporate tax rate. Because of the decrease in the U.S. corporate tax rate, we recorded deferred tax expense of $355,000 during 2017 due to this re-measurement. We have no material or provisional items for which the accounting of the effects of the Tax Reform Act on our consolidated financial statements is incomplete.

10. Earnings Per Share

Earnings per share for the periods indicated were computed as follows (in thousands except per share amounts):

	Year ended December 31,
	2016		2015
Numerators
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share:
Net income	$	3,585	$	4,526

Denominators
Denominators for basic and diluted earnings per share:
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic		21,126		20,824

Dilutive potential common shares
Stock options and awards		551		542
Denominator for diluted earnings per share		21,677		21,366

Net income per common share - basic	$	0.17	$	0.22
Net income per common share – diluted	$	0.17	$	0.21

11. Dividends

We paid dividends as follows:

	Year ended December 31,
	2016		2015
Dividend per share of common stock	$	0.060	$	0.045

12. Employee Benefit Plan

We provide our employees a 401(k) plan under which we make employer matching contributions in amounts determined by our Board of Directors. Our matching contributions were $143,000, and $126,000 for the 2016 and 2015, respectively.

13. Segment and Geographic Disclosures

In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting, we view our operations and manage our business as principally one segment. As a result, the financial information disclosed herein represents all of the material financial information related to our principal operating segment.

Revenues derived from customers and partners located in the United States accounted for approximately 77% of the Company’s total revenues in 2016 and approximately 76% of the Company’s total revenues in 2015. The remaining revenues were from customers and partners located in foreign countries, and each individual foreign country accounted for less than 10% of total revenues in 2016 and 2015. The Company attributes revenues to countries based on the country in which the customer or partner is located. None of our property and equipment was located in a foreign country as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Table of Contents

14. Concentration of Business Volume and Credit Risk

Our cash, cash equivalents and long-term investments are on deposit in banks and are collectively insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for $750,000. Our balances in excess of that amount are not insured. We may withdraw our cash deposits upon demand but in doing so may forfeit certain earned but unpaid interest on certain certificates of deposit if we redeemed them prior to their maturity date. We maintain our cash with multiple financial institutions of reputable credit to minimize our risk of loss.

We generally provide credit to our customers under typical invoice payment terms (for example, net 30) that gives rise to trade accounts receivable from those customers. We do not require collateral from our customers. We perform ongoing evaluations of the credit risk related to offering these payment terms. We provide an allowance for uncollectible accounts based on our historical collections experience and the profile of our accounts receivable.

In order to leverage the resources of third parties, we make our products available for purchase by end users through third-party, channel resellers even though those end users can also purchase those products directly from us. During 2016 and 2015, we earned approximately 14% and 11%, respectively, of our revenue from such sales through our largest, third-party, channel reseller.

In 2016 and 2015, approximately 23%, and 24%, respectively, of our revenues resulted from sales to customers in foreign countries. We received substantially all of our revenues from foreign customers in U.S. dollars resulting in limited exchange rate risks. Our foreign sales are concentrated mostly in Canada, Western Europe and Latin America.

We use software developers outside the United States to perform a portion of the coding for the development and maintenance of our software products. If we were unable to continue using these developers because of political or economic instability, we may have difficulty finding comparably skilled developers or may have to pay considerably more for the same work, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial position and results of operations.

15. Restatement

The Company has concluded that its previously issued consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 should be restated due to misstatements related to certain revenue transactions incorrectly recognized during the year ended December 31, 2016 as well as other transactions identified during the Audit Committee’s investigation and management’s analysis and for certain changes in the Company’s accounting methods, reclassifications and revisions as discussed in Note 2 to these consolidated financial statements.

Our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 have been restated to show the adjustments related to changes in the Company’s accounting methods, reclassifications and revisions as discussed in Note 2 to these consolidated financial statements. The impact of all the misstatements and adjustments described above on the consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ending December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

Table of Contents

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
December 31, 2016
(in thousands except per share amounts)


	Previously Reported			Adjustment			As Restated
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,895			-		$	8,895
Short term investments		2,754			-			2,754
Accounts receivable, net		6,964			(676	)		6,288
Federal income tax receivable		169			123			292
Prepaid and other expenses		521			10			531
Total current assets		19,303			(543	)		18,760

Long term investments		12,779			-			12,779
Property and equipment, net		456			-			456
Capitalized software development costs, net		3,743			-			3,743
Goodwill		12,712			-			12,712
Deferred tax asset, net		942			108			1,050
Other assets		245			-			245
Total assets	$	50,180		$	(435	)	$	49,745

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	876		$	54		$	930
Accrued expenses		1,836			(233	)		1,603
Deferred revenue		13,655			-			13,655
Income taxes payable		-			-			-
Total current liabilities		16,367			(179	)		16,188

Deferred revenue, non-current portion		3,790			-			3,790
Other long term liabilities		147			5			152

Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding		-			-			-
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 40,000,000 shares authorized, 21,920,912 shares issued		22			-			22
Additional paid-in capital		21,650			106			21,756
Treasury stock, 403,581 shares, at cost		(1,452	)		-			(1,452	)
Retained earnings		9,656			(367	)		9,289
Total stockholders’ equity	$	29,876		$	(261	)	$	29,615
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	50,180		$	(435	)	$	49,745

Table of Contents

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
(in thousands, except per share amounts)


	Previously Reported		Adjustment			As Restated

Operating revenues:
Software licenses	$	11,984	$	(741	)	$	11,243
Maintenance and support		18,668		-			18,668
Professional services		2,684		-			2,684
Total revenues		33,336		(741	)		32,595
Costs of revenues
Software licenses		3,110		(39	)		3,071
Maintenance and support		1,541		(4	)		1,537
Professional services		1,671		13			1,684
Total costs of revenues		6,322		(30	)		6,292
Gross profit		27,014		(711	)		26,303
Operating expenses
Sales and marketing		11,682		(124	)		11,558
General and administrative		6,975		(28	)		6,947
Research and development		2,539		32			2,571
Total operating expenses		21,196		(120	)		21,076
Income from operations		5,818		(591	)		5,227
Other income		159		-			159
Income before income taxes		5,977		(591	)		5,386
Income tax expense		2,026		(225	)		1,801
Net income	$	3,951	$	(366	)	$	3,585
Comprehensive income	$	3,951	$	(366	)	$	3,585

Net income per common share:
Basic	$	0.19	$	(0.02	)	$	0.17
Diluted	$	0.18	$	(0.02	)	$	0.17

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		21,126		21,126			21,126
Diluted		21,677		21,677			21,677

Cash dividends declared per share	$	0.06	$	-		$	0.06

Table of Contents

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
(in thousands)

	Previously Reported			Adjustment			As Restated
Operating Activities:
Net income	$	3,951			(366	)	$	3,585
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Bad debt expense		72			110			182
Depreciation and amortization		2,045			-			2,045
Stock-based compensation		973			41			1,014
Deferred taxes		(2	)		(108	)		(110	)
Excess tax deficiency from exercise of share based compensation		24			-			24
Subtotal before changes in operating assets and liabilities		7,063			(323	)		6,740
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(1,161	)		629			(532	)
Prepaid expenses		(10	)		(10	)		(20	)
Federal income taxes		352			(123	)		229
Accrued interest receivable		(163	)		-			(163	)
Other assets		(185	)		-			(185	)
Accounts payable		37			54			91
Accrued expenses		(58	)		(232	)		(290	)
Deferred revenues		1,177						1,177
Other long-term liabilities		13			5			18
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		7,065			-			7,065
Investing Activities:
Software development costs		(1,538	)		-			(1,538	)
Purchase of property and equipment		(226	)		-			(226	)
Purchase of certificates of deposit		(12,116	)		-			(12,116	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(13,880	)		-			(13,880	)
Financing Activities:
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		1,120			-			1,120
Tax deficiency (benefit) from stock-based compensation		(24	)		-			(24	)
Dividends paid		(1,271	)		-			(1,271	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(175	)		-			(175	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash		(6,990	)		-			(6,990	)
Cash at beginning of period		15,885			-			15,885
Cash at end of period	$	8,895		$	-		$	8,895

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	-		$	-		$	-
Income taxes	$	1,638		$	-		$	1,638

Table of Contents

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
(in thousands, except number of shares)

						Additional
	Common Stock					Paid-in			Treasury			Retained
	Shares			Amount		Capital			Stock			Earnings			Total


Balance at December 31, 2014 As Originally Filed		20,989,267		$	21	$	18,370		$	(1,452	)	$	3,889		$	20,828

Restated		(80,000	)										(500	)		(500	)

As Restated		20,909,267			21		18,370			(1,452	)		3,389			20,328

Shares issued upon exercise of stock options		314,200			-		508			-			-			508

Tax (deficiency) from stock-based compensation		-			-		58			-			-			58

Stock-based compensation expense
Stock options		-			-		464			-			-			464
Restricted stock		80,000			-		247			-			-			247

Common stock cash dividends		-			-		-			-			(940	)		(940	)

Net income as restated (See Note)		-			-		-			-			4,526			4,526

Balance at December 31, 2015		21,303,467		$	21	$	19,647		$	(1,452	)	$	6,975		$	25,191

Shares issued upon exercise of stock options		537,445			1		1,119			-			-			1,120

Tax benefit (deficiency) from stock-based compensation		-			-		(24	)		-			-			(24	)

Stock-based compensation expense
Stock options		-			-		741			-			-			741
Restricted stock		80,000			-		273			-			-			273

Common stock cash dividends		-			-		-			-			(1,271	)		(1,271	)

Net income as restated (See Note)		-			-		-			-			3,585			3,585

Balance at December 31, 2016		21,920,912		$	22	$	21,756		$	(1,452	)	$	9,289		$	29,615

Note:
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2016, as previously reported	$	3,951
Adjustment		(366	)
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2016, as restated	$	3,585

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2015, as previously reported	$	4,598
Adjustment		(72	)
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2015, as restated	$	4,526

Table of Contents

Consolidated Balance Sheet
As of December 31, 2015
(in thousands)


	As Previously Reported			Adjustments			As Restated
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	15,885		$	-		$	15,885
Short term investments		3,254			-			3,254
Accounts receivable, net		6,081			(143	)		5,938
Federal income tax receivable		290			255			545
Prepaid and other expenses		511			-			511
Total current assets		26,021			112			26,133

Long term investments					-
Property and equipment, net		498			-			498
Capitalized software development costs, net		3,982			-			3,982
Goodwill		12,712			-			12,712
Deferred tax asset, net		940			-			940
Other assets		60			-			60
Total assets	$	44,213		$	112		$	44,325

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		839			-			839
Accrued expenses		1,893			-			1,893
Deferred revenue		12,000			460			12,460
Income taxes payable		127			(127	)		-
Total current liabilities		14,859			333			15,192

Deferred revenue, non-current portion		3,612			196			3,808
Other long term liabilities		44			90			134

Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock		-			-			-
Common stock		21			-			21
Additional paid-in capital		19,582			65			19,647
Treasury stock		(1,452	)		-			(1,452	)
Retained earnings		7,547			(572	)		6,975
Total stockholders’ equity		25,698			(507	)		25,191

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	44,213		$	112		$	44,325

Table of Contents

Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
(in thousands, except per share amounts)


	As Previously Reported			Adjustments			As Restated

Operating revenues:
Software licenses	$	12,023		$	-		$	12,023
Maintenance and support		16,595			(106	)		16,489
Professional services		2,223			-			2,223
Total revenues		30,841			(106	)		30,735
Costs of revenues
Software licenses		2,428						2,428
Maintenance and support		1,466			4			1,470
Professional services		1,775			(380	)		1,395
Total costs of revenues		5,669			(376	)		5,293
Gross Profit		25,172			270			25,442
Operating expenses
Sales and marketing		10,025			406			10,431
General and administrative		6,168			(37	)		6,131
Research and development		2,562			9			2,571
Total operating expenses		18,755			378			19,133
Income from operations		6,417			(108	)		6,309
Other income (expense), net:
Interest expense		(4	)		-			(4	)
Interest income		82			-			82
Total other income (expense), net		78			-			78
Income before income taxes		6,495			(108	)		6,387
Provision for income taxes		1,897			(36	)		1,861
Net income	$	4,598		$	(72	)	$	4,526
Comprehensive income	$	4,598		$	(72	)	$	4,526

Net income per common share - basic	$	0.22		$	-		$	0.22

Net income per common share - diluted	$	0.22		$	-		$	0.21

Table of Contents

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
(in thousands)

	As Previously Reported			Adjustments			As Restated

Operating Activities:
Net income	$	4,598			(72	)	$	4,526
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Bad debt expense		62			(69	)		(7	)
Depreciation and amortization		1,553						1,553
Stock-based compensation		646			65			711
Deferred taxes		(248	)					(248	)
Excess tax deficiency from exercise of share based compensation		(58	)					(58	)
Subtotal before changes in operating assets and liabilities		6,553			(76	)		6,477
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(205	)		212			7
Prepaid expenses		(23	)					(23	)
Federal income taxes		(107	)		(126	)		(233	)
Accrued interest receivable		(69	)					(69	)
Other assets		40						40
Accounts payable		(272	)					(272	)
Accrued expenses		303						303
Deferred revenues		808			(100	)		708
Other long-term liabilities		(8	)		90			82
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		7,020			-			7,020
Investing Activities:
Software development costs		(1,967	)					(1,967	)
Purchase of property and equipment		(152	)					(152	)
Purchase of certificates of deposit		-						-
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(2,119	)		-			(2,119	)
Financing Activities:
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		508						508
Tax deficiency (benefit) from stock-based compensation		58						58
Dividends paid		(940	)					(940	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(374	)		-			(374	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash		4,527						4,527
Cash at beginning of period		11,358						11,358
Cash at end of period	$	15,885		$	-		$	15,885

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	-		$	-		$	-
Income taxes	$	2,146		$	-		$	2,146

Table of Contents

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

As previously disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2017, effective on March 27, 2017, RSM was dismissed as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

RSM performed the audit of the Company’s 2016 Financial Statements. In connection with the preparation of the 2016 Financial Statements, the Company changed certain accounting methods and the classification and presentation of its business activities in its financial statements. To ensure comparability between periods the Company revised the 2015 Financial Statements to conform them to the method of presentation in the 2016 Financial Statements. For more information, please see Note 2 of the Notes to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this report. The audit report of RSM on the 2016 Financial Statements did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

In connection with the audit of the 2016 Financial Statements and through the date of its dismissal, there were: (i) no disagreements between the Company and RSM on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of RSM, would have caused RSM to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in their report on the Company’s financial statements for such year, and (ii) no reportable events within the meaning set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S‐K.

On March 27, 2017, the Company announced that the Audit Committee had approved the appointment of BDO USA, LLP, or BDO, as its independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Company’s financial statements subject to completion of its standard client acceptance procedures.

Effective as of April 11, 2017, BDO notified the Company that it had completed such client acceptance procedures. On April 12, 2017, the Audit Committee formally engaged BDO as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Company’s financial statements. On August 1, 2017, the Company informed BDO that it had been dismissed as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee approved this dismissal. BDO did not issue any audit reports during the period of its engagement.

On August 2, 2017, GlobalSCAPE received a letter (the “10A Letter”) from BDO in accordance with Section 10A(b)(2) of the Exchange Act.

In the 10A Letter, BDO advised that on or around July 6, 2017 BDO was contacted by David Mann, the Audit Committee Chairman, who provided information about conduct that in BDO’s view indicated an illegal act, as defined by Section 10A of the Exchange Act, may have occurred. BDO stated in the 10A Letter that BDO was informed that the Company had learned of the subject conduct in May of 2017 and had already engaged the Company’s corporate outside counsel, along with forensic accountants, to conduct an investigation into the conduct and that additional information would be provided as the investigation continued. In a separate communication to the Audit Committee Chairman on July 6, 2017, BDO advised GlobalSCAPE of both its and BDO’s obligations under Section 10A of the Exchange Act and auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and that BDO would recommend that the Audit Committee engage independent counsel to conduct the investigation, which BDO defined as counsel who had not previously performed substantial work for the Company. BDO communicated that it did not believe the counsel GlobalSCAPE had engaged met that definition due to GlobalSCAPE’s historical working relationship with them.

BDO stated in the 10A Letter that additional information related to the conduct under investigation was provided to BDO by GlobalSCAPE’s corporate outside counsel on July 10, 2017, noting that employees of the Company had entered into “side agreements” with customers of the Company in December 2016 which increased revenue recorded, and accounts receivable, by amounts that had not yet been fully quantified. BDO was engaged by GlobalSCAPE on April 12, 2017, and was not the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm during the period in which the misconduct was alleged to have occurred.

Table of Contents

BDO stated in the 10A Letter that in a discussion with the Audit Committee Chairman on July 10, 2017, BDO discussed its request for the Company to engage other counsel to lead the investigation, and was told that the Company considered the engaged counsel to be independent. BDO stated in the 10A Letter that during that discussion BDO detailed the reasons for its concern, and that BDO viewed the Company’s failure to engage alternate legal counsel as a failure to take timely and appropriate remedial action as defined by Section 10A(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act, where absent action by the Company, BDO would not be in a position to assess the adequacy of the investigation, which BDO would consider a disagreement with the Company as it would limit the scope of BDO’s audit, warranting either a departure from its standard report or resignation from the audit engagement. In the 10A Letter, BDO stated that since July 10, 2017, in response to multiple requests by BDO, the Audit Committee reiterated their position that they would continue the investigation being performed by their corporate outside counsel, who they believe were sufficiently independent.

In the 10A Letter, BDO stated its belief that the Company had not been forthcoming with details regarding the investigation or the conclusions, if any, reached by counsel and the Company about the conduct at issue. In the 10A Letter, BDO stated that due to the lack of details that BDO had been provided regarding the investigation, and its dismissal as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, it was unable to determine whether it was likely that an illegal act had occurred, and whether the impact of any misstatements resulting from the alleged misconduct had a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In the 10A Letter, BDO stated that based on the limited information BDO had been provided, it believed that it was possible that the conduct could have had a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements that had been filed with the SEC, or that are expected to be filed in the foreseeable future. In the 10A Letter, BDO stated that it had been informed but had not confirmed that, at its urging in its communications with the Company on July 6, 2017, the Company had advised its prior auditor of the investigation. In the 10A Letter, BDO also stated that it did not believe senior management had taken timely and appropriate remedial action in response to the conduct, in particular by not having the investigation performed by counsel with no prior affiliation with the Company and by not sharing information from the investigation with BDO on a timely basis. In the 10A Letter, BDO also stated that the failure to take timely and appropriate remedial action may have either warranted a departure from a standard report or warranted BDO’s resignation, had BDO not been terminated.

As a result of the 10A Letter, on August 3, 2017, GlobalSCAPE filed a notice pursuant to Section 10A of the Exchange Act (the “Notice”) with the SEC. In the Notice, GlobalSCAPE notified the SEC of the 10A Letter received from BDO.

During the period from April 12, 2017 until the date of BDO’s dismissal and through August 7, 2017, the date of our Current Report on Form 8-K disclosing our receipt of the 10A Letter, except for the matters described above, there were no disagreements between the Company and BDO on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of BDO, would have caused BDO to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in its report on the Company’s financial statements for such year. On August 2, 2017, BDO reported that it considered the use of non-independent counsel to lead the investigation described above to be a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting, as such counsel could be influenced by the Company’s existing relationship with such counsel. During the period from April 12, 2017 until the date of BDO’s dismissal and through August 7, 2017, there were no other reportable events within the meaning set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

Effective on August 1, 2017, the Audit Committee approved the appointment of Weaver as its independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Company’s financial statements. During the two most recent fiscal years prior to such appointment and through August 1, 2017, the Company (or someone on its behalf) had not consulted with Weaver with respect to: (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; (ii) the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements; or (iii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K) or a reportable event (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

On November 20, 2017, the Chairman of the Audit Committee was orally informed by RSM that RSM was withdrawing from its engagement by the Audit Committee to reissue its audit report on the 2016 Financial Statements. On November 21, 2017, RSM delivered a withdrawal letter to the Chairman of the Audit Committee. In its withdrawal letter, RSM stated that (x) as of November 21, 2017, it had not completed the audit procedures necessary to reissue its report on the 2016 Financial Statements and (y) based on the information the Audit Committee provided from its investigation, RSM had concluded that, in its professional judgment, it could no longer rely on management’s representations, which the Company has concluded is a “reportable event” as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

Table of Contents

The audit report originally issued by RSM on the 2016 Financial Statements, when previously filed, did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. However, as previously disclosed in the August 8-K, the 2016 Financial Statements included in the Original Filing, including the auditor’s report on the 2016 Financial Statements included in the Original Filing, should no longer be relied upon in light of the Restatement. In connection with the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and through the date of RSM’s dismissal on March 27, 2017, there were: (i) no disagreements between the Company and RSM on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of RSM, would have caused RSM to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in their report on the Company’s financial statements for such year, and (ii) no reportable events within the meaning set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K. During the period from August 15, 2017, when RSM was re-engaged to reissue its audit report on the restated consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 until November 21, 2017, there were: (i) no disagreements between the Company and RSM on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of RSM, would have caused RSM to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in their report on the Company’s financial statements for such year, and (ii) except as set forth above, no reportable events within the meaning set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

On December 1, 2017, the Chairman of the Audit Committee received a letter from Padgett in which Padgett stated that based on the circumstances described in the August 8-K surrounding the dismissal of BDO as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and the previously disclosed withdrawal of RSM from its engagement by the Audit Committee to reissue its audit report on the 2016 Financial Statements, and based on the fact that current management is substantially the same as the management in place in 2015, Padgett had concluded that it could not rely on management’s representations that would be necessary for Padgett to complete the audit procedures necessary to issue consents to the inclusion of its audit report on the 2015 Financial Statements in the Company’s filings or transactions after the date of the letter. Padgett also stated in its letter that (1) it was not at that time aware of whether any of the circumstances described in the August 8-K with respect to the 2016 Financial Statements could have been applicable to the Company’s 2015 Financial Statements, and (2) it had not reached a conclusion as to whether it was necessary for Padgett to withdraw its Report on the 2015 Financial Statements. The Company has concluded that this is a “reportable event” as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

The audit report originally issued by Padgett on the 2015 Financial Statements, when previously filed, did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. In connection with the audit of the 2015 Financial Statements and through the date of Padgett’s resignation as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm on October 19, 2016 as a result of the partners of Padgett becoming partners of RSM, there were: (i) no disagreements between the Company and Padgett on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Padgett, would have caused Padgett to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in its report on the Company’s financial statements for such year, and (ii) no reportable events within the meaning set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K. During the period from October 19, 2016 until December 1, 2017, there were: (i) no disagreements between the Company and Padgett on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Padgett, would have caused Padgett to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in its report on the Company’s financial statements for such year, and (ii) except as set forth above, no reportable events within the meaning set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

Effective on December 13, 2017, the Audit Committee expanded the initial appointment of Weaver as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm with respect to the audit of the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 to also include serving as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm with respect to the audit of the 2015 Financial Statements and the 2016 Financial Statements. In connection with the expansion of the initial appointment of Weaver to include serving as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm with respect to the audit of 2015 Financial Statements and the 2016 Financial Statements, the Audit Committee made Weaver aware of the matters discussed by RSM and Padgett in their communications to the Chairman of the Audit Committee.

During 2015 and 2016 and through August 1, 2017, the date that Weaver was appointed as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm with respect to the audit of the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company (or someone on its behalf) had not consulted with Weaver with respect to: (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; (ii) the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements; or (iii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K) or a reportable event (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

Table of Contents

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

No system of controls, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the system of controls are met. No evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that the system of controls has operated effectively in all cases. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the objectives of disclosure controls and procedures are met.

At the time of the Original Filing, our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2016. In connection with the internal investigation described in the Explanatory Note to this Form 10-K/A and the filing of this Form 10-K/A, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, we re-evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2016. Further, our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our interim Chief Financial Officer, re-evaluated the conclusions regarding our disclosure controls and procedures and concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2016 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Prior to our Original Filing, our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on its assessment at the time of our Original Filing, our management concluded that, as of December 31, 2016, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.

Subsequent to our Original Filing, our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our interim Chief Financial Officer, re-evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 using the criteria set forth in the Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). We identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting which are described below.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In connection with our management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting described above, our management has identified the following deficiencies that constituted individually, or in the aggregate, material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.

Table of Contents

We had material weaknesses in our control environment and monitoring:

·	We did not implement effective oversight of our finance and accounting processes (including organizational structure and reporting hierarchy), which impacted our ability to make appropriate decisions regarding revenue recognition.

·	We did not effectively design and implement appropriate oversight controls over our period-end financial closing and reporting processes, and our review controls were not sufficient to ensure that errors regarding revenue recognition would be detected.

·	We did not effectively monitor (review, evaluate and assess) the risks associated with key internal control activities that provide the revenue information contained in our consolidated financial statements.

We had material weaknesses related to internal control monitoring and activities to support the financial reporting process:

·	We did not maintain effective controls over the invoicing process to ensure that proper supporting documentation was received prior to preparing invoices.

·	We did not maintain effective controls over the revenue recognition process to ensure revenue was only recognized when all four criteria of our revenue recognition policy were met.

Because of these material weaknesses, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with GAAP as of December 31, 2016.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report, at the time of our Original Filing, was not subject to audit by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act signed into law on July 21, 2010, which permits us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

With the exception of the remediation efforts described below, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the annual period covered by this report and during the subsequent time period through the filing of this Form 10-K/A that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

We designed a remediation plan to strengthen our internal control over financial reporting and have taken, and will continue to take, remediation steps to address the material weaknesses described above. We also continue to take meaningful steps to enhance our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal controls over financial reporting.

Our remediation plan includes the following:

·	Creating and implementing a policy clearly stating that all terms and conditions of agreements with customers are to be recorded in writing, communicated to finance and accounting personnel, and recorded in our permanent records prior to the creation of a sales invoice.

·	Conducting periodic training sessions and briefings to communicate our policies and procedures regarding our standard terms and conditions that we offer to customers and how we document and communicate approved deviations from those standard terms and conditions.

Table of Contents

·	Enhancing the breadth and depth of the review by finance and accounting personnel of sales invoices and underlying supporting documentation to ensure that unusual items are identified and considered when determining revenue recognition.

·	Establishing a total invoice dollar amount threshold over which finance and accounting personnel must examine all actual invoices and supporting documentation to confirm the purchase by the customer and the appropriate revenue recognition profile.

·	Publishing guidelines that personnel can reference which set forth the requirements to be met for revenue to be recognized from a sale transaction and conducting periodic meetings with personnel to educate and remind them of these guidelines.

Our management is implementing and monitoring the effectiveness of these and other processes, procedures and controls and will make any further changes deemed appropriate. Our management believes the foregoing remedial efforts will effectively remediate the material weaknesses. As the Company continues to evaluate and work to improve its internal control over financial reporting, our management may determine to take additional measures to address control deficiencies or determine to modify the remediation plan described above. If not remediated, these control deficiencies could result in further material misstatements to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to GlobalSCAPE’s Proxy Statement for its 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the SEC on March 31, 2017.

GlobalSCAPE has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all its employees, including its President and Chief Executive Officer and its Interim Chief Financial Officer. GlobalSCAPE will provide a copy of its Code of Ethics to any person without charge upon written request to:

Karen J. Young

Interim Chief Financial Officer

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

4500 Lockhill-Selma, Suite 150

San Antonio, Texas 78249

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to GlobalSCAPE’s Proxy Statement for its 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the SEC on March 31, 2017.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to GlobalSCAPE’s Proxy Statement for its 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the SEC on March 31, 2017.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to GlobalSCAPE’s Proxy Statement for its 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the SEC on March 31, 2017.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to GlobalSCAPE’s Proxy Statement for its 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the SEC on March 31, 2017.

Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1)	Financial Statements and Schedules

	The following financial statements of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. are included in Item 8:

	·	Consolidated Balance Sheets — December 31, 2016 and 2015

	·	Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income — Years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

	·	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity — Years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

	·	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

	·	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — December 31, 2016 and 2015

(2)	Schedules not listed above have been omitted because they are not applicable or required, or the information required to be set forth therein is included in the Financial Statements or Notes thereto.

(3)	Exhibits

Exhibit
Number		Description
3.1		Amended Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed November 17, 2006).

3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company effective as of October 30, 2008 (Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K filed November 5, 2008).

4.1		Specimen of Stock Certificate (Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-K filed April 2, 2001).

*10.1		1998 Stock Option Plan as amended May 13, 1999 (Filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Form 10-K filed May 12, 2000).

*10.2		2000 Stock Option Plan dated May 8, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 4.3 to Form 10-K filed May 12, 2000).

*10.3		Form of 1998 Stock Option Plan Rights Termination Letter Agreement of Directors to Agree Not to Claim Any Right of Adjustment dated February 4, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 4.6 to Form 10 filed May 12, 2000).

*10.4		Form of 1998 Stock Option Plan Rights Termination Letter Agreement for Employees and Consultants to Cancel Options dated February 8, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 4.7 to Form 10, filed May 12, 2000).

*10.5		Form of 1998 Stock Option Plan Rights Termination Letter of Officer to Agree Not to Claim Any Right of Adjustment dated February 8, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 4.8 to Form 10 filed May 12, 2000).

*10.6		Form of 1998 Stock Option Plan Rights Termination Letter Agreement of Officer to Agree Not to Exercise Options dated February 8, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 4.9 to Form 10 filed May 12, 2000).

*10.7		Form of 1998 Stock Option Plan Reinstatement and Adjustment Letter for Employees dated December 19, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed April 2, 2001).

*10.8		Form of Release and Indemnity Agreement between GlobalSCAPE, Inc. and Employees dated December 19, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 10.18 to Form 10-K filed April 2, 2001).

*10.9		Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan (Filed as Exhibit 10.21 to Form 10-K filed April 1, 2002).

100

Table of Contents

*10.10		Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q filed November 13, 2006).

*10.11		GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2006 Non-Employee Directors Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed June 7, 2007).

*10.12		Form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement under GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2006 Non-Employee Directors Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed November 14, 2007).

*10.13		Form of Employment Agreement for Executive Officers at Vice President-level and above (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed August 19, 2009).

*10.14		GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2010 Employee Long Term Equity Incentive Plan dated June 3, 2010 (Filed as Appendix A to the Definitive Proxy Statement filed April 22, 2010).

*10.15		Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2010 Employee Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan dated June 3, 2010 (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on February 10, 2015).

*10.16		Form of Employment Agreement dated as of April 1, 2015 by and between GlobalSCAPE and each of Matthew C. Goulet and James W. Albrecht, Jr. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on April 1, 2015).

10.17		Form of Indemnification Agreement by and between GlobalSCAPE and each of its directors and named executive officers (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on May 18, 2015).

*10.18		GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2015 Non-Employee Directors Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (Filed as Appendix A to the Definitive Proxy Statement filed April 2, 2015).

*10.19		Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement pursuant to the GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2015 Non-Employee Directors Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on May 18, 2015).

*10.20		Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2010 Employee Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan dated June 3, 2010 (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on February 4, 2016).

10.21		Stock Purchase Agreement dated January 9, 2017 by and between Thomas H Brown, David L. Mann and 210 Capital LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed January 9, 2017).

14.1		Code of Ethics (Filed as Exhibit 14.1 to Form 10-K filed March 27, 2008).

21.1		Subsidiaries of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. (Filed as Exhibit 21.1 to Form 10-K filed March 29, 2012).

23.1		Consent of Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P. (Filed herewith).

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Filed herewith).

31.2		Certification of Interim Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Filed herewith).

32.1		Certification of Interim Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Filed herewith)

101		Interactive Data File.

* Management Compensatory Plan or Agreement

101

Table of Contents

Item 16. 10-K Summary

None.

102

Table of Contents

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in San Antonio, Texas on June 14, 2018.

	GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

	By:	/s/ Matthew C. Goulet
		Matthew C. Goulet
		President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities indicated on June 14, 2018.

	Signature		Title

	/s/ Matthew C. Goulet		President and Chief Executive Officer and Director
	Matthew C. Goulet		(Principal Executive Officer)

	/s/ Karen J. Young		Interim Chief Financial Officer
	Karen J. Young		(Principal Finance and Accounting Officer)

			Chairman of the Board and Director
	Thomas W. Brown

	/s/ David L. Mann		Director
	David L. Mann

	/s/ Frank M. Morgan		Director
	Frank M. Morgan

	/s/ Dr. Thomas E. Hicks		Director
	Dr. Thomas E. Hicks

103

GLOBALSCAPE INC - FORM 10-K/A - June 14, 2018

Attached files

GLOBALSCAPE INC Reports