Attached files

file filename
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL, INC.ex_101394.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL, INC.ex_101393.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL, INC.ex_101392.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL, INC.ex_101391.htm
EX-23.1 - EXHIBIT 23.1 - LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL, INC.ex_101390.htm
EX-21.1 - EXHIBIT 21.1 - LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL, INC.ex_101389.htm


 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-K

 


(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 For the fiscal year ended September 29, 2017 

 

OR

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 For the transition period from             to  

Commission file number 0-27248   

 

LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 


   

Delaware

95-3133814

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer 

Identification No.)

13650 Dulles Technology Drive

Herndon, VA

20171

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

 

(703) 709-9119

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered

None

None

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $.0001 par value

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth Company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

  (do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

   

Emerging growth company

 

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

 

The aggregate market value of the common stock, $.0001 par value, held by non-affiliates of the registrant, as of April 1, 2017 was $11,311,394. (Excludes 7,568,652 shares held by directors and officers of the registrant since such persons may be deemed to be affiliates.)

 

The number of shares of common stock, $.0001 par value, outstanding as of December 01, 2017, was 13,224,349.

  


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE 

Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement of the registrant to be delivered to stockholders in connection with the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

 



1

 

 

LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

  

  

Page

Part I 

  

  

  

Item 1.

Business

5

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

13

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

24

Item 2.

Properties

24

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

25

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosure

25

  

  

  

Part II

  

  

  

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

26

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

26

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

27

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

38

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

39

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

64

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

64

Item 9B.

Other Information

65

  

  

  

Part III

  

  

  

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

66

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

66

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

66

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

66

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

66

  

  

  

Part IV

  

  

  

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

66

  

  

  

Exhibit Index  

67
   

Signatures  

71

 

2

 

 

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Report” or “Form 10-K”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). You can find many (but not all) of these statements by looking for words such as “approximates,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “would,” “may” or other similar expressions in this Report. Our forward-looking statements, including the Outlook section in our Management’s Discussion and Analysis contained herein, relate to future events or our future performance and include, but are not limited to, statements concerning our business strategy, future commercial revenues, market growth, capital requirements, new product introductions, expansion plans and the adequacy of our funding. Other statements contained in this Report that are not historical facts are also forward-looking statements.

 

We claim the protection of the safe harbor contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We caution investors that any forward-looking statements presented in this Report, or that we may make orally or in writing from time to time, are based on our beliefs, assumptions made by us and information currently available to us. Such statements are based on assumptions, and the actual outcome will be affected by known and unknown risks, trends, uncertainties and factors that are beyond our control or ability to predict. Although we believe that our assumptions are reasonable, they are not guarantees of future performance, and some will inevitably prove to be incorrect. As a result, our actual future results can be expected to differ from our expectations, and those differences may be material. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on forward-looking statements, which are based on known results and trends at the time they are made, to anticipate future results or trends.

 

Some of the risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include those related to the following:

 

 

ability to reverse our trend of declining year over year revenues and negative cash flows from operations and to maintain sufficient liquidity;

 

 

ability to obtain additional liquidity in amounts and on terms acceptable to the Company;

 

 

ability to successfully implement our new strategies to achieve our cost reduction goals;

 

 

competition;

 

 

international operations, including currency fluctuations;

 

 

attracting and retaining qualified personnel;

 

 

intellectual property, including having to defend potential infringement claims;

 

 

implementation of partnerships with third party providers of courses and or course material;

 

 

efficient delivery and scheduling of our courses;

 

 

technology development, new technology introduction;

     
 

maintaining cybersecurity

 

 

the timely development, introduction, and customer acceptance of our courses and other products;

 

 

changing economic and market conditions; and

 

 

adverse weather conditions, strikes, acts of war or terrorism and other external events.

 

For further discussion of these and other factors see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Risk Factors.” It should be noted that the risks included in this Report and our other filings are not exhaustive, and additional factors could adversely affect our business and financial performance. We operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

 

3

 

 

This Report and all subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We do not undertake and specifically disclaim any obligation to release publicly any revisions or updates to our forward-looking statements to reflect events, occurrences or circumstances, whether or not anticipated after the date of this Report except as otherwise required by law.

   

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING CLASSIFICATION AS A SMALLER REPORTING COMPANY

 

Our Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended September 29, 2017 has been prepared following the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) guidelines for a smaller reporting company as defined by 229.10 (Item 10) of Regulation S-K. The rules and guidelines for a smaller reporting company allow a company to reduce the amount of historical disclosure required.  

 

4

 

 

PART I

 

Item 1.            BUSINESS.

 

As used in this Report (unless the context otherwise requires) “Learning Tree”, “we”, “our”, the “Company”, and “us” refer to Learning Tree International, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

 

Overview

 

Learning Tree International, Inc. is a leading worldwide provider to business and government organizations for the training and workforce development of their information technology (“IT”) professionals and managers. Since our founding in 1974, we have provided high-quality, predominantly vendor independent training to more than 2.5 million IT professionals and managers. In fiscal year 2017, while presenting courses in 39 countries, we trained 53,170 course participants from approximately 4,700 organizations, including large national and multinational companies, government organizations, and small and medium-size companies.

 

We offer a broad library of intensive, instructor-led courses from one to five days in length, which at September 29, 2017 comprised 318 different course titles representing 5,889 hours of training, including 159 multi-day IT course titles, 76 multi-day management course titles, and 83 one-day course titles. Learning Tree courses provide education and training across a wide range of technical and management disciplines, including operating systems, databases, computer networks, cyber and network security, web development, programming languages, software engineering, open source applications, project management, business skills, leadership and professional development. We use a well-defined systematic approach to develop and update the Learning Tree course library so as to provide training that is immediately applicable by course participants to their work in a broad range of applications and industries. After assessing market need, courses may be translated into Swedish and Japanese. Our proprietary course development process enables us to efficiently and effectively customize our course content to specific customer requirements for delivery at customer sites.

 

We also partner with other organizations to broaden the breadth of training that we offer to our customers, with the objective of enabling us to meet an organization’s complete workforce needs. In terms of vendor partners, we reached agreement with Microsoft to become a Microsoft approved training partner, and we now offer Microsoft approved courses. This also allows us to accept Microsoft training vouchers and eliminates the need for us to maintain duplicate course content which has allowed us to retire the majority of our self-developed Microsoft courses. We have also begun offering our customers the ability to take courses we do not have in our course library from approved “Partner” providers. Through these “Partner” providers, we are able to offer courses in a number of different vendor technologies and products, including Cisco, Adobe, IBM, Red Hat, VMware, Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto Networks, and Amazon Web Services. In addition to our partnering strategy, we also recently announced that we will be making certain select proprietary Learning Tree course content available for use under a license agreement through third party resellers.  This is an additional approach to recognize value from our significant proprietary course content library.

 

We are also working more closely with a number of certification and accreditation organizations to offer training programs for IT professionals seeking to earn such certifications. We are a continuing professional education (CPE) provider of the International Information Systems Security Certification Consortium. In addition, we are on the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy National Registry of CPE sponsors; a Registered Education Provider of the Project Management Institute; an APMG International Accredited Training Organization; an International Institute of Business Analysis (IIBA) Endorsed Education Provider; an AXELOS Global Best Practice Strategic Partner; a GCHQ Certified Cyber Security Training Provider; a British Computing Society (BCS) Accredited Training Organization; and a Skills Framework for the Information Age (SFIA) Foundation Accredited Training Partner.  We also maintain partnerships and offer courses with Computing Technology Industry Association (CompTIA), International Council of E-Commerce Consultants (EC-Council), International Consortium for Agile (ICAgile), Information Systems Control Association (ISACA), International Info System Security Certification Consortium (ISC)2, International Software Testing Qualifications Board (ISTQB), Lean Kanban, Scrum Alliance, and The Open Group (TOGAF). In the United Kingdom, our courses can be used to gain a Master’s degree in Professional Computing at Staffordshire University under a program administered by the Faculty of Computing, Engineering and Technology.

 

In addition to training, we offer a suite of Workforce Optimization Solutions to support an IT organization’s life-cycle of workforce development needs. Our solutions help ensure that an organization’s investment in training is relevant and leveraged to improving overall organization performance. These solutions range from helping organizations define their job roles, to assessing the current skills of the staff, providing coaching and mentoring of staff, offering blended learning in which we use different training modalities to offer an organization an optimized learning approach and even serving as an outsourced provider of an organization’s learning and training requirements.

 

5

 

 

We market and present our training courses and Workforce Optimization Solutions through locally staffed operations in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Sweden and Japan. In fiscal year 2017, we generated approximately 37% of our revenues outside of the United States. We coordinate, plan and deliver our courses at our own Education Centers, hotels, conference centers, other specially equipped facilities, and customer sites worldwide.

 

We also offer courses through our proprietary live on-line learning platform, Learning Tree AnyWare™, which enables individuals located anywhere in the world to use an Internet browser to connect with the classroom and participate online in instructor-led classes being conducted live in our Education Centers, at customer locations, or at other specially equipped facilities, without the need to travel or commute to the course site. Once logged in, AnyWare™ class participants see and hear their classroom-based instructor and classmates in real time, and can view the instructor’s annotations on two in-class MagnaLearn™ projection screens. They are able to participate in discussions, ask questions, work in breakout sessions, and complete the hands-on exercises in the same way as their in-class counterparts under the guidance of an expert instructor. They gain the full benefit of our proprietary courseware, and achieve the same level of knowledge and skill transfer as in-class participants. Through technology such as AnyWare™, we are effectively applying technology to leverage the strengths of our classroom offerings while also providing greater flexibility to our customers by offering more scheduled course dates from which to choose. We are continuing to investigate other technology-based training formats and how they may be effectively integrated into our training programs.

 

Our instructors are not full-time employees of Learning Tree; rather, they are practicing professionals selected for their expertise of the subject matter they teach, who are compensated on the basis of the number of actual courses taught. Our average instructor has over 20 years of hands-on, real world experience in the fields that they teach. Learning Tree instructors teach an average of approximately seven course events per year on an as-needed basis. During the rest of the year, they typically work for other organizations either as full-time employees or as independent technical or management consultants. 

 

Business Strategy

 

The needs of organizations for training and professional development are evolving, and particularly so in the IT technical, analyst, and management disciplines. Organizations, whether commercial companies or government agencies, are looking to ensure the investment in their IT workforce directly supports improved outcomes, including more successful project delivery, improved delivery processes and product quality, and ultimately improved business or mission outcomes. Further, from an individual learner’s perspective, the rise of e-learning solutions has provided significant new options for self-directed learning. As such, Learning Tree’s primary focus is evolving from being an IT training company for its customers’ employees to now becoming a company that partners with the IT organizations of its customers to meet the full range of an organization’s training needs for its workforce. As such, in addition to our goal of maintaining our position as the premier provider of instructor led IT training and professional development, our business strategy has evolved to encompass three objectives:

 

 

Offer a full range of Workforce Optimization Solutions that augment our traditional hands-on, instructor-led training capabilities. Our Workforce Optimization Solutions cover the life-cycle of workforce development needs, from helping organizations define their organization structures, processes, and job roles; to assessing the current knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs) of the staff; to supporting the implementation of the means to enhance the KSAs through training, coaching, and mentoring of staff, along with supporting organizational process improvements; and to providing an outsourced service in which Learning Tree manages all of an organization’s learning initiatives. These additional solutions augment and support our traditional training service offerings. As an example, the use of Learning Tree’s automated skills assessments can provide customers with objective feedback on the strengths and weaknesses of their IT staff in their respective professional disciplines. Such information is particularly valuable in creating custom learning plans, including recommended training courses to maximize a staff member’s effectiveness on the job. From an organizational perspective, our instructors, who are practitioners in their field, can go beyond the classroom to support organizations in driving process changes, in areas as diverse as planning and budgeting, service management, and project management.

 

6

 

 

 

Add e-Learning capabilities to our training solutions. Based on existing studies, instructor-led training currently remains the best way to learn a subject area. Yet we recognize that self-directed e-Learning (meaning online courses without an instructor) continues to grow and gain market acceptance, given the convenience and lower costs of e-Learning in certain situations. Accordingly, Learning Tree believes that a blended learning approach, in which we work with an organization to harness the best of both instructor-led and e-learning is the most effective way to deliver our courses and for attendees to learn today. To that end, we have and will continue to work with our clients to develop customized e-Learning modules that are optimized to augment instructor-led classes. We intend to extend this model and work with other e-Learning platform providers, tailoring our classes to maximize the effectiveness of a blended learning solution.

 

 

Provide a comprehensive suite of training courses to meet the needs of IT organizations. Learning Tree develops and maintains its own proprietary course content for its training courses worldwide. In addition to our own proprietary courses, we strategically broadened our course offerings by adding titles from certification organizations, hardware and software vendors, and from other training vendors. As an example, we are partnering with ISC2, an organization offering cyber security professional certifications, to offer their courses for preparation of the exams to become a Certified Information Systems Security Professional (“CISSP”) and a Certified Cloud Security Professional (“CCSP”). In regards to vendor partners, we have entered an agreement to offer official Microsoft courseware that will be taught by our instructors at our Education Centers.  While causing us to retire some of our proprietary Microsoft courses, we anticipate adding more than 70 Microsoft course titles, which will significantly broaden our Microsoft curriculum. In addition, the agreement also provides us with the ability to offer Microsoft on-demand courseware that can be taken any time. We are also now offering courses provided by other training providers for a wide range of courses, including training on Cisco, Adobe, IBM, Red Hat, VMware, Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto Networks, and Amazon Web Services products. By providing a comprehensive suite of training courses to IT organizations, we are able to more effectively partner in providing the full complement of courses needed by our customers.

 

We are experiencing growth in our business of supporting enterprise customers by providing them with Workforce Optimization Solutions and customized training products to meet their needs. However, we continue to experience a decline in course attendance at our public courses which are taught at our Education Centers. To address this decline, the Company has been working to leverage resellers and other partner models to increase our sales reach, increasing the size of our sales teams, shortening the duration of some of our courses and partnering with certification organizations and other training providers to broaden and deepen the training products we offer. Our overall objective continues to be the reversal of the year-over-year declines in revenue we have experienced recently by stabilizing revenue from training offered to our clients at our Education Centers while growing revenue from enterprise clients through Workforce Optimization Solutions and other customized training products.  

 

Comprehensive Cost Reduction Program

 

In addition to strategies to stabilize and grow our revenue in fiscal year 2018 and improve liquidity, we continued to reduce our operating expenses through a comprehensive cost reduction program initiated in fiscal year 2016. As a result of this program, we reduced operating expense by approximately $10.7 million in fiscal year 2017 compared to operating expense in fiscal year 2016. This excludes non-cash restructuring charges of $1.9 million in fiscal year 2016 and $0.4 million in fiscal year 2017 relating to excess classroom capacity at our Reston, VA facility. In addition, we reduced our cost of revenues in fiscal year 2017 by $9.9 million or 19.7% by right-sizing our operations and reducing travel and shipping costs. We intend to continue taking appropriate steps to streamline our operations to reduce or eliminate excess costs. 

 

Workforce Optimization Solutions.

 

As described above, a core strategy is to grow our position as a leading worldwide provider of training and workforce development to IT professionals and managers of large national and multinational companies, medium-size companies and government organizations. Over the past few years, we have started working with our clients to provide additional services that address the life cycle of organizational performance challenges that exists within IT organizations worldwide. To that end, we introduced IT Workforce Optimization Solutions during the 2015 fiscal year, which is a comprehensive suite of services to support the IT organizations of our clients with the objective of: defining organizational structure, processes, and job roles; assessing current staff skills and abilities; implementing performance improvements by enhancing the skills and abilities of staff and helping to implement process improvements; and providing an outsourcing service in which Learning Tree provides the full management of an organization’s learning initiatives. Workforce Optimization Solutions augments and enhances our core training capabilities enabling Learning Tree to partner with our customers in helping them develop a high-performing organization through workforce development and process improvement.

 

7

 

 

As part of Workforce Optimization Solutions, we offer a skills assessment solution aligned with competencies defined by the non-profit organization, Skills Assessment for the Information Age (SFIA) Foundation. Our current skills assessment library contains more than 15,000 questions that cover 130 different roles across IT disciplines. We have developed an automated, online tool for individuals to complete assessments, and we are working with several companies to help them assess staff competencies as input to developing individual learning plans.

 

Through Workforce Optimization Solutions, we are successfully providing Project Acceleration Workshops for organizations. These workshops combine training with support work on a specific customer project. For example, a Project Acceleration Workshop might be focused on creating a Work Break Down (WBS) structure for a project, and as such our instructor would provide training to the customer project team on that subject. But the Workshop would then focus on the creation of a WBS for a specific customer project, so that at the end of the Workshop, the customer project team has both a tangible tool and skill to help manage their project. We frequently receive positive feedback on the value of these workshops by both attendees and the customer organizations.

 

While Workforce Optimization Solutions is a key strategic initiative for the Company, we do not anticipate Workforce Optimization Solutions in and of itself will generate significant revenue as a product.  It is, however, an important strategy to expand our relationships with both existing and new customers and as such, positions us to offer additional training solutions, particularly to larger customers.

 

In addition to our new business strategies, we continue to invest in and develop our sales functions. Beginning in fiscal year 2018, we combined our North American sales forces into a single team that now enables every sales representative to offer the best training solution for the customer. This change together with the Workforce Optimization Solutions we now offer has enabled us to better position ourselves to support large corporations and government agencies and has supported our financial objective by helping us to begin to once again grow our revenue base.

 

 Commitment to Quality Training. For the past 43 years, we have set the highest standards of excellence in educating and training IT professionals and managers throughout the world. Our course participants have consistently rated Learning Tree instructors and courses at the top end of the scale. These ratings reflect our ongoing commitment to quality and innovations in instructional delivery, including our patented MagnaLearn™ Instructional Enhancement System, AdaptaLearn™ Hands-On Learning System, After-Course Instructor Coaching, Computing Sandbox for Practice and Experiments, as well as the latest up-to-date hands-on course equipment, continuing revision and updating of our course materials, and the ongoing training and coaching of our already superb instructors. Our AnyWare™ e-Learning platform extends the full range of Learning Tree features and standards to our online participants, so that they enjoy the same results as our in-class participants.  

 

  High Quality Instructor Team. As of September 29, 2017, we had more than 650 course instructors located around the world. Learning Tree instructors are practicing professionals with expert subject knowledge. Our average instructor has over 20 years of “hands-on, real world” experience in the fields they teach. Learning Tree instructors teach an average of approximately seven course events per year on an as-needed basis. During the rest of the year, they typically work for other organizations either as full-time employees or as independent technical or management consultants. This on-demand structure enables us to quickly schedule additional courses anywhere in the world and to respond efficiently to customers’ needs for IT and management skills training. Our course participants particularly benefit because Learning Tree instructors generally spend the majority of their time working in industry settings, and therefore provide our course participants with up-to-date, practical knowledge and skills in the latest technological and management developments. Our instructors also provide us with unique access to a large pool of industry experts on IT and management trends throughout the world that is especially valuable in our decisions and development process for new course titles.

 

Our success depends on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled instructors. We use a systemized process in each of our local operating subsidiaries to identify, engage, train, coach, and evaluate our instructor team. Our instructors are highly loyal as evidenced by our annual instructor retention rate of over 90%.

 

Broad Course Library. We offer a broad course library which as of September 29, 2017 totaled 318 instructor-led one- to five-day course titles comprising a total of 5,889 hours of classroom instruction covering a wide range of IT and management topics.

 

8

 

 

The following table itemizes the number of Learning Tree course titles and number of hours of training by curriculum as of September 29, 2017:

 

Curriculum

 

Number of

Course Titles

   

Total Hours of

Training

 

Cyber Security

    30       603  

Windows Systems

    26       630  

SQL Server

    26       498  

Agile and Scrum

    25       354  

Leadership & Professional Development

    23       264  

Project Management

    20       306  

SharePoint

    18       372  

.NET/Visual Studio

    16       312  

Web Development & XML

    15       264  

Business Analysis

    15       216  

ITIL® & COBIT® Training

    13       288  

Big Data

    12       222  

Microsoft Office

    12       168  

Software Development

    11       192  

Networking & Virtualization

    10       270  

Linux & UNIX

    9       174  

Java Programming

    9       162  

Communication Skills

    8       150  

Oracle Databases

    7       174  

Mobile App Development & Mac Programming

    6       120  

Cloud Computing

    4       78  

Python, Perl, & C++

    3       72  

Total

    318       5,889  

 

 

As a leading provider of IT training, our objective is to provide our customers with job-focused, hands-on learning experiences that best meet their needs for the development of their professional IT staff and managers. We design our proprietary courses to provide participants an unbiased perspective of both the strengths and limitations of software and hardware products and an understanding of how to compare and integrate multiple platforms and technologies from various vendors. Drawing from the expertise of our international team of instructors, each course incorporates multiple points of view concerning IT applications used throughout the world. Our IT courses are designed to be highly interactive; most involve “hands-on” training on networked state-of-the-art workstations so that participants can practice and assimilate the skills being taught. Participants spend a significant portion of each hands-on course working on computer-based exercises and participating in group workshops and class interactions. As a result, they return to their jobs with the confidence to immediately apply the new skills and knowledge they have gained.

 

To ensure that we can meet the full needs of our customers for IT training, we are selectively augmenting our own proprietary courses by offering courses from vendors and other content providers.  Prior to adding any such courses to our library, we use our subject matter experts to review the courses to ensure that such courses will meet the standards of quality that our customers expect from Learning Tree.

 

Our management courses, while including core concepts and theory, focus heavily on providing practical skills, tools, and techniques that participants can apply immediately upon returning to their jobs. Participants work extensively in group exercises that provide them an opportunity to practice applying key concepts in real-world situations. These real-world scenarios are primarily delivered through our performance-based management training platform which brings the real world to life in the classroom through the use of computer-based and rich-media simulations, supplemented with substantial amounts of hands-on exercises and group activities, all facilitated by experts in their respective fields.

    

As of September 29, 2017, we offered 159 multi-day titles in our IT curriculum, compared to 140 multi-day titles at the end of fiscal year 2016. As of September 29, 2017, we offered 76 multi-day titles in our management curriculum, compared to 70 multi-day titles at the end of fiscal year 2016. As of September 29, 2017, we offered 83 one-day courses compared to 139 one-day course titles at the end of fiscal year 2016, bringing the total number of courses offered to 318. The number of one-day course titles declined significantly in 2017 because we retired a large number of these courses due to low demand.

 

9

 

 

Over our 43-year history, we have developed and implemented a well-defined, systematic approach for rapidly developing, customizing and updating courses in the Learning Tree library and for translating our course content into multiple languages. We organize courses into curricula that reflect general topics or disciplines. We continuously update our course curriculum structure and course content and add new course titles to keep pace with the introduction of new technologies and to reflect the evolving training needs of our customers. To identify potential new courses for development, we incorporate feedback from the worldwide Learning Tree instructor team, course participants and customers, and from the development groups of leading IT vendors. In fiscal year 2017, we introduced 63 new multi-day course titles, while retiring 38 multi-day and 56 one-day course titles. We expect course development costs to vary in the future, primarily depending on the number of new titles we introduce in any period, as well as the overall size of the total course library we must maintain. As described above, we also partner with other organizations to offer their course titles.

 

International Infrastructure and Logistics Capability. We meet customer demand for scheduling flexibility by delivering course events frequently and at multiple locations throughout the world, and by making our advertised course titles available online through Learning Tree AnyWare™. Our sophisticated infrastructure and logistics capability allow us to coordinate, plan and deliver Learning Tree courses at our education centers, hotels, and conference facilities worldwide. We also present standard or customized courses on demand at customer facilities whenever and wherever desired, with quality standards that are identical to those for courses presented in Learning Tree Education Centers. By using our team of 650 instructors, our course development and customization processes, our team of customer support specialists, our logistics team and our thousands of classroom computer workstations, we can rapidly and effectively deliver our Learning Tree courses both domestically and internationally.

 

In fiscal year 2017, we presented 4,543 course events at Learning Tree Education Centers and at third-party and customer sites in a total of 39 countries. We currently operate wholly-owned subsidiaries in the United States (since 1974), the United Kingdom (since 1978), Canada (since 1985), Sweden (since 1986) and Japan (since 1989). Each subsidiary is staffed by local personnel responsible for the sale and delivery of courses in its local country as well as in other designated countries. In fiscal year 2017, our foreign operations produced approximately 37% of our revenues. See Note 9 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for financial data regarding operating segments and geographic regions. In August 2017, the Company terminated its License Agreement, dated March 3, 2015, with Educinvest SPRL, which became effective immediately. The License Agreement was entered into with Educinvest at the time of the sale of the Company’s subsidiary in France and provided for the license of courses by Educinvest in France.  The French market is now being served by our UK operation while the Company is evaluating other business opportunities that may be available to it as a result of the termination of the License Agreement.

 

Long-Term Relationships with Global Customer Base. We have built long-standing relationships with our customer base of large national and multinational companies, medium-sized companies and government organizations throughout the world, and seek to build continuing relationships both with these employers and with the individual employees who participate in our courses. Our customers operate in a wide range of sectors, including finance, computer, communications, electronics, systems integration, aerospace, government and military, manufacturing, and energy. Of our 100 largest clients in fiscal year 2012, 99 were still our clients five years later in fiscal year 2017. In fiscal year 2017, more than 100 of our corporate and government customers purchased at least $100,000 of Learning Tree services. No one commercial customer or government agency accounted for 10% or more of our revenues in fiscal year 2017.  

 

Backlog. Our sales backlog at September 29, 2017 was $13.5 million. This compares to a sales backlog of $14.8 million at September 30, 2016. We currently expect the entire backlog to be executed within fiscal year 2018.

 

Multi-Tiered Sales and Marketing Organization. We have a multi-tiered sales and marketing organization that integrates digital marketing, telemarketing and field sales to market and sell our course offerings to existing customers and to attract new customers. As of September 29, 2017, we employed a team of 28 full-time field sales representatives and a telemarketing sales team of 81 full and part-time telemarketers and related support staff.

 

We maintain a strong brand image for providing high-quality training for IT professionals and managers through the prominent use of our trademarks in our marketing and course materials. We market our courses primarily through digital marketing campaigns and electronic mail to our proprietary database of approximately three (3) million technology professionals and managers who have attended, inquired about, or sent a staff member to Learning Tree courses. We send targeted, personalized e-mails through our automated e-mail marketing system to advise prospective course participants of upcoming events. We also market our products and services on our website (www.learningtree.com). Information contained on our website is not part of this Form 10-K.

 

10

 

 

To encourage repeat purchases from existing customers, we have introduced My Learning Tree for attendees and managers of attendees. Learning Tree customers are provided with their own ‘My Learning Tree’ account, which attendees and their managers can use to access a growing list of unique benefits. We also offer multiple-course discount programs through Learning Tree “Training Passports” and Learning Tree “Training Vouchers”, and provide the Specialist and Expert Certification Programs. We believe that in addition to generating revenues directly, these programs foster long-term relationships with participants and encourage participants to recommend Learning Tree courses to their colleagues.

 

Learning Tree Training Passports permit an individual Passport holder to attend up to a specified number of courses, generally two, three or four, during a one- to two-year period. List prices for Passports are significantly discounted from the list price of the equivalent number of individual courses. The Learning Tree Training Voucher program allows corporate customers to buy Vouchers in quantities from three to hundreds at volume-discounted prices, for future courses to be taken by any person in the customer organization generally over a 12-month period.

 

Markets and Competition

 

Instructor-Led Training. We are a for-profit provider of IT training and management education. Our main competitors offer course titles and programs similar to ours at prices in a range equal to or lower than ours.

 

The IT and management training markets in which we compete include outside third-party providers, as well as in-house training conducted by organizations for their own employees. In addition, third-party providers of training include non-profit associations, as well as “for-profit providers” and both for-profit and non-profit “academic providers”, who offer courses that lead to accredited undergraduate or graduate degrees.

  

The IT and management training market is highly fragmented with low barriers to entry. We face intense competition from both established entities and new entries in the market. Our primary competitors include: 

 

 

internal training departments;

 

 

computer hardware and software vendors and their authorized training and education center partners;

 

 

independent education and training companies;

 

 

academic providers; and

 

 

systems integrators and value-added resellers.

 

Many third-party training providers offer training as one of several services or product lines. We differentiate ourselves from these providers based on our experience over four decades, the breadth and quality of our proprietary course library, our addition of workforce optimization solutions, our worldwide delivery capability, and the size, quality and experience of our instructor force.

 

Internal training departments generally deliver training at lower cost than third parties and provide companies with the most control over the method and content of training, enabling them to tailor programs to their specific needs. However, internal trainers find it difficult to keep pace with new technologies, lack the hands-on experience needed to teach the latest technological developments and lack the capacity to meet demand for training, and therefore many organizations must supplement their internal training resources with externally supplied training. This is particularly relevant when dealing with new and emerging technologies. Additionally, internal training departments may not deliver consistent content or use consistent instructional methods on a worldwide basis, while we offer consistent course contents, instructional methods, and quality around the globe.

 

E-Learning and Blended Learning. IT and management training are primarily delivered by classroom instructors, video, and technology-based training, including Internet-based e-learning and printed means. Independent industry reports suggest that, consistent with the prior ten years, instructor-led classroom delivery continues to be the most widely used method for delivery of corporate training, with approximately 66% of all training being instructor-led. We believe this is because instructor-led training provides the greatest ability for participants to learn, practice and receive feedback on their mastery of new knowledge and skills. Course participants value the personalized interaction and problem-solving with their instructor and fellow participants, and the opportunity to get expert advice on the application of the course material to their own projects. Furthermore, instructor-led classroom training insulates course participants from workplace interruptions and accelerates their learning of new technologies. The use of technology-based IT training formats, such as Internet-based e-learning, has gained acceptance in the IT and management training and education market, largely gaining market share at the expense of other self-study formats including video and printed materials.

 

11

 

 

We have continued to investigate technology-based training formats and how they might effectively be integrated into our training programs. We developed Learning Tree AnyWare™, our proprietary live online learning platform that integrates participants in remote online locations into live class events in another location. Remote participants use an ordinary Internet connection to connect to our AnyWare™ classroom interface. Once logged in, remote AnyWare™ class participants see and hear their classroom-based instructor and classmates in real time, and view the instructor’s annotations on two in-class MagnaLearn™ projection screens. They are able to participate in discussions, ask questions, work in breakout sessions, and complete the same hands-on exercises under the guidance of an expert instructor as their in-class counterparts. With the use of our AnyWare™ product, our clients anywhere in the world can choose to participate in any course event being taught at any of our Education Centers, without the need to travel or commute to the actual course site.

 

We have utilized stand-alone AnyWare™ Learning Centers in strategic locations to promote the use of on-line attendance through the use of our AnyWare™ product. These AnyWare™ Learning Centers provide our customers convenient access to our courses via our AnyWare™ platform in a setting optimized for equipment, communication, Internet connectivity speed, and learning environment, at a location near to where they live or work, minimizing added travel costs to attend courses at our Education Centers. As acceptance of the AnyWare™ product has grown, we have reduced the number of stand-alone AnyWare™ Learning Centers, which are typically located in short-term leased facilities with a capacity to handle from two to five attendees. As of September 29, 2017, we had a total of 17 Learning Tree AnyWare™ Learning Centers, including six stand-alone AnyWare™ Learning Centers in North America, four in Sweden, and another seven located within our Education Centers. The AnyWare™ Learning Centers located within our existing Education Centers in North American have the capacity to handle on average eight attendees each.

 

 In recognition of the growing use of e-learning products in the IT and Management training market, we are selectively incorporating e-learning capabilities into our course library to improve our customers’ learning experience.  We currently offer a number e-learning products, including products from Microsoft, EC-Council, and Red Hat.  During fiscal year 2018, we anticipate releasing additional products, including stand-alone labs for various technologies and blended learning modules which augment instructor-led courses with e-learning capabilities.

 

Strategic Initiatives

 

Learning Tree has been and is continuing to explore strategic options available to it to enhance stockholder value. The Company is continuing to evaluate all strategic options available to it, including those to obtain additional sources of capital and financing in order to improve its liquidity. There is no assurance that additional capital and/or financing will be available to the Company and, even if available, whether it will be on terms acceptable to us or in amounts required. Learning Tree does not expect to comment further or update the market with any additional information on the strategic options it is evaluating, unless and until its Board of Directors deems disclosure appropriate or necessary.

 

Employees 

 

Our executive officers have extensive experience in the training and education industries with an average tenure of 11 years at Learning Tree and over 22 years of relevant industry experience.

 

On September 29, 2017, we had a total of 257 full-time equivalent employees, 93 of whom were employed outside the United States. We also utilized the services of 650 expert instructors to teach our courses on an “as-needed” basis.

   

Intellectual Property Rights

 

Our course development process and many of our course titles are proprietary, and we rely on a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, customer licensing agreements, employee and third-party nondisclosure agreements and other methods to protect those proprietary rights.

 

12

 

 

“LEARNING TREE”, “LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL”, the Learning Tree “Tree Design” logo, “LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL” and Design, “LEARNING TREE PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION” and Design, “LEARNING TREE ANYWARE BE THERE WITH ANYWARE” and Design, “LEARNING TREE ANYWARE”, “ANYWARE”, “ANYWARE” and Design, “ANYWARE LEARNING CENTER”, “ANWARE LIVE”, “ANYWARE LIVE” and Design, “LEARNING TREE ANYWARE ENTERPRISE”, “LEARNING TREE ANYWARE ENTERPRISE” and Design, and “LEARNING TREE ANYWARE YOUR EXPERTISE DELIVERED ANYWHERE!” and Design, “BE THERE! …WITH ANYWARE”, “EDUCATION IS OUR BUSINESS”, “EDUCATION YOU CAN TRUST”, “WE BRING EDUCATION TO LIFE”, “PRODUCTIVITY THROUGH EDUCATION”, “REALITYPLUS” and Design, “REALITYPLUS MANAGEMENT EDUCATION FOR THE REAL WORLD”, “TRAINING PASSPORT”, “TRAINING ADVANTAGE”, “ALUMNI GOLD”, “TRAINING YOU CAN TRUST”, “WE BRING LEARNING TO LIFE”, “WWW.LEARNINGTREE.COM”, “MAGNALEARN”, “VENDOR INDEPENDENT TRAINING YOU CAN TRUST”, “ADAPTALEARN”, “ADAPTALEARN” and Design, “MY GOLD CLUB” and Design, “MY LEARNING TREE”, “MY LEARNING TREE” and Design, “LIVELINKED”, “LIVELINKED” and Design, “LIVELINKED CLASSROOM”, “LIVELINKED CLASSROOM” and Design, “LEARNING TREE UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM” and Design, “ON-SITE COURSES” and Design, “800-LRN-TREE”, “800-THE-TREE” and LEARNING TREE LEAP SYSTEM are among our trademarks and service marks. In addition to our trademarks and service marks, this Form 10-K also contains trademarks and trade names of other companies.

  

We develop proprietary course content and own the copyright to the majority of course materials we develop. We believe these copyrights help differentiate our services from those of our competitors.

 

Our MagnaLearn® Instructional Enhancement System is covered by patents in the United States and a number of foreign countries. The MagnaLearn® system gives Learning Tree instructors greater flexibility to customize and pace course presentations by allowing them to annotate, highlight and manipulate course materials on two independent projection screens, in real time. The system also provides automated feedback to our course development staff, allowing us to continually improve and update our course content worldwide and on an immediate basis from a centralized location.

 

We have also obtained patent protection in the United States and a number of foreign countries related to our Learning Tree AnyWare™ live online learning platform. 

 

Regulatory Environment

 

We are paid directly by the employers of course participants and do not receive funding from any government student-aid or loan programs. As a result, we do not depend on government Title IV funding and are generally exempt from the governmental regulation of public education providers. However, our results of operations could be affected by future changes to current licensing or regulatory requirements.

 

Available Information

 

We make available free of charge on our website (www.learningtree.com) via our “Investor Relations” link, our Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports filed or furnished with the SEC pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed or furnished to the SEC. In addition, information concerning purchases and sales of our equity securities by our executive officers and directors is posted on our website. Information contained on our website is not part of this Form 10-K. Our 10-K may also be obtained free of charge by written request to the Chief Financial Officer, Learning Tree International, Inc., 13650 Dulles Technology Drive, Herndon, VA 20171. Members of the public may read and copy any document that Learning Tree files with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information about the Public Reference Room. The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information that issuers, including Learning Tree, file electronically with the SEC.

 

Item 1A.         RISK FACTORS.

 

You should carefully consider the following discussion of various risks and uncertainties, keeping in mind that they are not the only ones that affect us. Additional risks that we do not presently consider material, or of which we are not currently aware, may also have an adverse impact on us.

 

Going Concern; Limited Liquidity and Negative Cash Flows

 

We have had negative cash flows from operations, have not achieved a net profit on an annual basis for the past three years and there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. If we are not able to generate positive cash flow, our business operations may not be able to continue.

 

13

 

 

Over the past three years we have experienced net losses and declining revenues. In fiscal year 2017, our worldwide revenues from continuing operations decreased to $70.7 million from $81.6 million in fiscal year 2016, or 13.4%. In fiscal year 2016, our worldwide revenues from continuing operations decreased to $81.6 million from $94.9 million in fiscal year 2015, or 14.0%. These conditions raised substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern as reported in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2016. While we initiated several business strategies and initiatives to stabilize and increase revenue and implemented a comprehensive cost reduction program that reduced both cost of revenues and operating expenses, there is no assurance we will be able to generate sufficient cash flow, improve our profitability or increase our liquidity for fiscal year 2018 and beyond. As a result, the report the Company received from its independent registered public accounting firm on its consolidated financial statements as of September 29, 2017 again contains an explanatory paragraph stating that there is substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we become unable to continue as a going concern, we may have to liquidate our assets, and may realize significantly less than the values at which they are carried on our financial statements, and stockholders may lose all or part of their investment in our common stock.

 

Our consolidated financial statements were prepared based on the assumption that we will continue to operate as a going concern and do not reflect any adjustment that might result if we were not able to continue operations.

 

The consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2017 that accompany this Form 10-K were prepared under the assumption that we will continue to operate as a going concern. Although our consolidated financial statements raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, they do not reflect any adjustment or impact that might result if we were not unable to continue ongoing operations.

 

Our Financing Agreement requires there to be acceptable Company accounts receivable in order to receive advances from our lender, which amounts may not be available in the amounts or at the times that we may need them.

 

We entered into a Financing and Security Agreement dated January 12, 2017 (“Financing Agreement”) with Action Capital Corporation (“Action Capital”), which provides us with potential access to borrow up to $3.0 million. Amounts advanced to us under this Financing Agreement are subject to the prior approval of Action Capital and the availability of accounts receivable acceptable to Action Capital. Accordingly, there is no assurance that advances will be made to us in the amounts and at the times when they are requested by us, which could have an adverse impact on our liquidity and ability to operate the business. In addition, we may not have the requisite amount of acceptable accounts receivable in order to borrow up to the maximum principal amount under the Financing Agreement.

 

The loss of available credit under the Financing Agreement or termination of the Financing Agreement could adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to operate our business.

 

We are currently in compliance with all of the terms and conditions of the Financing Agreement. If, however, events were to occur which result in either a termination of the Financing Agreement, us losing all or a substantial portion of our available credit under the Financing Agreement, or if we are otherwise prevented from accessing such funds, and we did not have an alternative line of credit or other additional sources of capital available, then we would need to rely upon our cash and cash equivalents for our working capital needs, which may not be sufficient. In addition, because the Financing Agreement has no set term and may be terminated by either party at any time, we cannot be certain that access to capital sourced through this lending arrangement will be available when needed. If we were unable to replace this source of liquidity, then our ability to fund our operations could be materially and adversely affected. We cannot be certain that any additional financing will be available to us or that it will be available on commercially reasonable terms.

 

We currently have limited sources of liquidity and may need to obtain another credit facility and/or raise new capital to provide additional liquidity. If we fail to obtain additional liquidity as needed, then we will continue to rely on our balance of cash and cash equivalents on hand, cash flows from operations to finance our operating cash needs to the extent that our operating cash flows will allow and amounts available under any existing lending arrangements.

 

Prior to entering into the Financing Agreement, we primarily relied upon our balance of cash and cash equivalents plus cash flows from operations to finance our operating cash needs. Our working capital needs have exceeded, and are anticipated to continue to exceed for the near future, our cash flows from operations. If we do not generate positive cash flow from operations or have access to advances under the Financing Agreement at the amounts we need or obtain access to capital from additional sources that may or may not be available to us, or even if available, may not be on satisfactory terms or in adequate amounts, then our cash and cash equivalents will continue to decline. Consequently, any adverse impact on our operating results would impact our cash flows from operations and our ability to continue to meet our operating cash needs which would likely have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and our stock price.

 

14

 

 

Price Fluctuations and Limited Market for Our Common Stock

 

Historically, our common stock price has fluctuated, and we expect fluctuations to continue in the future.

 

General Factors. We believe some of the reasons for past fluctuations in the price of our stock related to factors such as:

 

 

variations in our revenues, gross margins, cash flows, earnings or other financial results;

 

 

fluctuations in general conditions in the economy, our market, and the markets served by our customers;

 

 

announcements of developments related to our business, including recent announcements regarding the Company’s going concern, potential strategic initiatives and cost cutting measures;

 

 

announcements concerning new products, strategies or enhancements by us or our competitors;

 

 

developments in our relationships with our customers;

 

 

market perceptions of new means of delivering training;

 

 

introductions of new technologies both by our customers and technology vendors; and

 

 

limited public float and low daily trading volume.

 

In addition, prices in the stock market, particularly for technology-related stocks, have been volatile in recent years. In some cases, the fluctuations have been unrelated to the operating performance of the affected companies. As a result, the price of our common stock could fluctuate in the future without regard to our operating performance.

 

Future Sales of Our Common Stock and Securities.

 

Sales of our common stock by our founders, officers, directors and employees could adversely and unpredictably affect the price of shares of our common stock. Additionally, the price could be affected even by the potential for sales by these persons. In addition to the 13,224,349 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 1, 2017, as of that date, we are authorized to issue up to 650,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise of outstanding options. We cannot predict the effect that any such future sales of our common stock, or the potential for those sales, will have on our share price.

 

In addition, the Company is looking at different strategic options available to it to increase its capital and improve its liquidity, which may include raising capital through the sale of equity or debt securities. If the Company completes the sale of additional shares of common stock or other equity securities of the Company, such sales may adversely impact the stock price of the Company’s common stock and also result in potential dilution of existing stockholders.

 

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQX US Market (OTCQX) and has a limited trading market.

 

The Company’s common stock is quoted on the OTCQX, and the quotation of our common stock on the OTCQX does not assure that a liquid trading market exists or will develop. Stocks traded on the OTCQX marketplace generally have limited trading volume and exhibit a wider spread between the bid/ask quotations than stocks traded on national exchanges. Moreover, a significant number of institutional investors have investment policies that prohibit them from trading in stocks on the OTCQX marketplace. As a result, investors may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations of the price of, our securities. This significantly limits the liquidity of the common stock, and may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. A limited market may also impair our ability to raise capital by selling shares of capital stock and may impair our ability to acquire other companies or assets by using common stock as consideration.

 

We do not currently, and are not expected to in the foreseeable future, meet the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market or any other national securities exchange. We presently anticipate that our common stock will continue to be quoted on the OTCQX. As a result, investors must bear the economic risk of holding their shares of our common stock for an indefinite period of time.

 

15

 

 

Our common stock is a “penny stock” which may adversely impact the liquidity of our common stock.

 

The SEC has adopted regulations that generally define “penny stock” as an equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to specific exemptions. The market price of our common stock is, and is expected to continue to be in the near term, less than $5.00 per share and, therefore, a “penny stock.” Brokers and dealers effecting transactions in a “penny stock” must disclose certain information concerning the transaction, obtain a written agreement from the purchaser and determine that the purchaser is reasonably suitable to purchase the securities. Those rules may restrict the ability of brokers or dealers to sell the Company’s common stock and may affect the ability of our stockholders to sell their shares of our common stock. In addition, if our common stock continues to be quoted on the OTCQX as we expect, then our stockholders may find it difficult to obtain accurate quotations for our stock, and may find few buyers to purchase our stock and few market makers to support its price.

 

FINRA sales practice requirements may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

 

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") has adopted rules that require that, in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA has indicated its belief that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. These FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that at least some of their customers buy our common stock, which may limit the ability of our stockholders to buy and sell our common stock and could have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

  

Fluctuations in Operating Results

 

We may be unable to realize our business strategy of improving operating performance, growing our business and generating savings and improvements. Over the past five years the Company has been experiencing a decline in course attendance and revenue generated from our operations. As a result, we have been implementing new strategic initiatives, including those described in this Form 10K, which include offering and expanding the services provided through Workforce Optimization Solutions, adjusting the duration of some of our courses to be more competitive, the comprehensive cost reduction program, Guaranteed to Run (“GTR”) courses, and pricing promotions that are designed to improve our operating performance, stabilize and increase revenue and grow our business. The failure to achieve the goals of some or all of these initiatives could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and our business as a whole. There is no assurance that we will be able to pursue, successfully implement or realize the expected benefits of any initiative or that we will be able to sustain improvements made to date.

 

Historically, our operating results have fluctuated, and we expect fluctuations to continue in the future. Fluctuations in our historical operating results have resulted from many factors, some of which are beyond our control. In the future, these or other factors could have a material adverse impact on our operating results and cause our stock price to decrease. For example:

 

Timing of Course Development, and Sales and Marketing Expenditures. We try to adjust our expenditures for course development and sales and marketing to maintain our long-term profitability, including our assessment of the potential to influence future customer demand, market conditions, and other factors. This may mean accepting reduced margins in poor economic periods, as we must commit too much of our spending before our attendees enroll in our courses. If revenues fall short of our expectations, we may not be able to adjust our expenditures quickly enough to compensate for lower than anticipated revenues. This could compound the impact of any revenue shortfall and further affect our operating results and the price of our common stock.

 

 Many of the new titles now being offered are not developed or taught by Learning Tree, but rather were obtained from other providers. As we are reselling other providers courses, our ability to ensure a quality customer experience is limited. While we do review and approve partner courses before offering them to our customers, our revenues could be negatively impacted if our customer is not satisfied with their course.

 

16

 

 

Course Scheduling and Marketing Activities. The timing and content of our courses and our marketing activities can affect the number of participants who attend our courses. Some of the activities that can contribute to fluctuations in our operating results include:

 

 

the frequency of our course events;

 

 

the number of weeks during which our courses can be conducted in a quarter;

 

 

the timing, timely delivery, frequency and size of, and the response to, our marketing and advertising campaigns;

 

 

the timing of introduction of new course titles;

 

 

the average length of courses, based on the current mix of course titles, which affects the average revenue per attendee; and

 

 

the mix between course events held at customer locations and course events held in our education centers and hotels due to differing gross profit margins.

 

Seasonal Factors. Our quarterly revenues and income fluctuate due to the seasonal spending patterns of our customers, which are affected by factors such as:

 

 

cyclic or one-time budgetary considerations;

 

 

government spending and budget cycles;

   

 

factors specific to their business or industry; and

 

 

weather, holiday and vacation considerations.

 

Use of Accounting Estimates. The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with Accounting Principles Generally Accepted in the United States (GAAP”) requires us to make estimates and assumptions in calculating our financial results. As one example, we currently offer our customers a multiple-course sales discount referred to as a Training Passport, which allows an individual Passport holder to attend up to a specified number of Learning Tree courses over a one- to two-year period for a fixed price. For a Training Passport, the amount of revenue we recognize for each attendance in one of our courses is based upon the selling price of the Training Passport, the list price of the course taken, the average list price of all courses taken, and our estimate of the average number of courses a Passport holder will actually attend. After expiration of a Training Passport, we record the difference, if any, between the revenue previously recognized and the Training Passport selling price. We base our estimate of the average number of course events that a Training Passport holder will attend based on historical trends. However, these historical trends may not accurately predict the actual number of course events that a Training Passport holder will attend in the future. If average Training Passport attendance rates were to increase, for example, we would have to make negative adjustments to our revenue, which could be significant. For a summary of some of our key accounting estimates, please see our “Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

We may not be able to fully utilize our deferred tax assets and changes in our tax rates or exposure to additional tax liabilities could adversely affect our financial position. In fiscal year 2012, we established a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets in the United States due to current year and projected future pre-tax book losses. We continue to maintain this valuation allowance throughout fiscal years 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017. Management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes and in determining whether any deferred tax assets will be realized in full or in part, primarily with respect to projected taxable income. The estimate of future taxable income can never be predicted with certainty as it is dependent on numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control. Substantial variance of actual results from estimated future taxable profits, or changes in our estimate of future taxable profits, could lead to changes in deferred tax assets being realizable, and would require a corresponding adjustment to the valuation allowance. Our income tax provision could be significantly impacted by estimates surrounding our uncertain tax positions, decisions on repatriation of foreign earnings, and changes to our valuation allowance in future periods. As a result, we may not be able to use the full amount of our deferred tax assets and may be exposed to elevated tax rates or additional tax liabilities, which could adversely affect our financial position.  

 

Changing Regulation of Corporate Governance and Public Disclosure. Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure can result in uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs incurred with ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. As a result, our efforts to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new or changed laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to practice, our reputation may be harmed.

 

17

 

 

Introductions and Adoption of New Technology. Our customers tend to increase their training at times when new technology is being introduced. During periods when fewer new technologies are being introduced, demand for our training courses may decrease, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and stock price.

 

Other Factors. Other factors that may affect our operating results include:

 

 

competitive forces within our current and anticipated future markets;

 

 

our ability to attract customers and meet their expectations;

 

 

currency fluctuations and other risks inherent in international operations;

 

 

general economic conditions;

 

 

differences in the timing of our spending on the marketing of our courses, as well as the timing of our spending on the development of our courses and other areas; and

 

 

excess capacity and/or unused space in our education centers and/or administrative office facilities, and our ability to sublease or find other uses for it.

 

All or any of these and similar factors could cause our operating results to differ substantially from the expectations of public market analysts and investors, which would likely have a material adverse impact on our stock price.

 

Risks Associated with Technology Changes

 

If we do not adequately anticipate or respond to changes in technology, it could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and stock price. Changes in technology can affect our business in at least two principal ways. First, we must anticipate and keep pace with the introduction of new hardware, software and other information technologies and develop courses that effectively train customers in the technologies they use now and will use in the future. Second, we must adapt to changes in the technologies by which we can deliver training to our customers’ employees. As a result of technology developments, we may have to make substantial and unanticipated expenditures to develop new course titles, buy new equipment, or invest in further course development software and processes to deliver our courses. Our liquidity and cash flow situation could negatively impact our ability to accomplish this. Further, we may not adequately anticipate or respond successfully to technology changes for many reasons, including misjudging the impact of technology changes, as well as financial, technological or other constraints. A lack of adequate response on our part to changes in information technology platforms, customer preferences or software technology could have a material adverse impact on our operating results and stock price.  

 

Competition

 

If our customers decide that they prefer training offered by new or existing competitors, it could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and stock price. The IT and management training markets are highly fragmented, with low barriers to entry. No single competitor holds a dominant market share. We face intense competition from both established entities and new entries in the market. Our primary competitors include:

 

 

internal training departments within our current and potential customers;

 

 

computer hardware and software vendors and their Authorized Training and Education Center partners;

 

 

independent education and training companies;

 

 

academic providers; and

 

 

software systems integrators.

 

Some of our competitors offer course titles and programs similar to ours at lower prices. In addition, some competitors have greater financial and other resources than us. Additionally, hardware and software vendors, as well as software systems integrators, may combine IT education and training with sales of their products or other services, which could allow them to offer training at lower prices than we do. Furthermore, future consolidation of IT vendors or training companies could have a material impact on our future operations.

 

The risk of outsourcing of corporate IT administration and software development overseas to countries or firms not currently served by us could have a material adverse impact on our future operations.

 

18

 

 

Although instructor-led classroom training continues to dominate the worldwide IT and management training markets, technology-based education and training formats, such as Internet-based distance learning, have gained some acceptance. Accordingly, our future results may also depend on the extent to which the market will continue to accept instructor-led IT and management training and on our ability to develop and market instructor-led courses that compete effectively against technology-based courses offered by our competitors.

 

Risks Associated with International Operations

 

Approximately 37% of our annual revenue is generated by courses conducted outside the United States. Therefore, if we do not adequately anticipate and respond to the risks inherent in international operations, it could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and stock price.

  

Foreign Currency Fluctuations. Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in U.S. dollars, while the operations of our foreign subsidiaries are conducted in their respective local currencies. Consequently, changes in exchange rates can unpredictably and adversely affect our consolidated operating results and could result in exchange losses. We do not hedge against the risks associated with fluctuations in exchange rates. Even if we were to use hedging techniques in the future, we might not be able to eliminate or reduce the effects of currency fluctuations. Thus, exchange rate fluctuations could have a material adverse impact on our operating results and stock price.

 

Our operations in the United Kingdom pose additional risks to our profitability and operating results. Following a referendum on June 23, 2016 in which voters in the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) approved an exit from the European Union ("EU"), it is expected that the U.K. government will initiate a process to leave the EU (often referred to as “Brexit”), including negotiating the terms of the U.K.’s future relationship with the EU. Such an exit from the EU is unprecedented, and it is unclear how the U.K.’s access to the EU Single Market, and the wider commercial, legal and regulatory environment, will impact our U.K. operations and customers. Our U.K. operations service customers in the U.K. as well as in other countries in the EU, and these operations could be disrupted by Brexit, particularly if there is a change in the U.K.’s relationship to the EU Single Market. While the full scope of implementation of the referendum decision is still unclear, companies exposed to or with operations in the U.K., such as ours, may face significant regulatory changes as a result of Brexit implementation, and complying with such new regulatory mandates may prove challenging and costly. In particular, significant portions of the U.K.’s regulatory regime related to intellectual property and data protection are derived from or harmonized with wider EU directives, and significant change is possible should the U.K. withdraw from the EU. Even prior to any change to the U.K.’s relationship with the EU, the announcement of Brexit may create economic uncertainty surrounding the terms of the U.K.’s exit and its consequences could adversely impact customer confidence resulting in customers reducing their spending budgets on our products and services, which would adversely affect our businesses and results of operations.

 

Changes in the European regulatory environment regarding privacy and data protection regulations could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations. We are subject to a number of laws, rules and directives (which we refer to as “privacy laws”) relating to the collection, use, retention, security, processing and transfer (which we refer to as “process”) of personally identifiable information about our customers and employees (which we refer to as “personal data”) in the countries where we operate. Much of the personal data that we process, especially financial information, is regulated by multiple privacy laws and, in some cases, the privacy laws of multiple jurisdictions. In many cases, these laws apply not only to third-party transactions, but also to transfers of information between or among us, our subsidiaries, and other parties with which we have commercial relationships.

 

Regulatory scrutiny of privacy, data protection, collection, use and sharing of data is increasing on a global basis. There is uncertainty associated with the legal and regulatory environment around privacy and data protection laws, which continue to develop in ways we cannot predict, including with respect to evolving technologies such as cloud computing. Privacy and data protection laws may be interpreted and applied inconsistently from country to country and impose inconsistent or conflicting requirements. Complying with varying jurisdictional requirements could increase the costs and complexity of compliance or require us to change our business practices in a manner adverse to our business, and violations of privacy and data protection-related laws can result in significant penalties and damage to our brand and business. In addition, compliance with inconsistent privacy laws may restrict our ability to provide products and services to our customers. A determination that there have been violations of privacy or data protection laws could expose us to significant damage awards, fines and other penalties that could, individually or in the aggregate, materially harm our business and reputation.

 

In Europe, we are subject to the 1995 European Union (“EU”) Directive on Data Protection (“1995 Data Protection Directive”), which requires EU member states to impose minimum restrictions on the collection and use of personal data that, in some respects, are more stringent, and impose more significant burdens on subject businesses, than current privacy standards in the United States. We may also face audits or investigations by one or more foreign government agencies relating to our compliance with these regulations that could result in the imposition of penalties or fines. The EU member state regulations establish several obligations that organizations must follow with respect to use of personal data, including a prohibition on the transfer of personal information from the EU to other countries whose laws do not protect personal data to an adequate level of privacy or security. On December 15, 2015, the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (Council) reached a political agreement on the future EU data protection legal framework referred to as the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which will replace the 1995 Data Protection Directive. The GDPR will have significant impacts on how businesses can collect and process the personal data of EU individuals. The GDPR will become effective in May 2018. The Company is undertaking measures to seek to comply with the GDPR by the effective date. The costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, such laws, regulations and policies that are applicable to us may limit the use and adoption of our products and solutions, alter the way we conduct business and/or could otherwise have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.

 

Other Risks Associated with International Operations. Additionally, our results of operations may be adversely affected by other international risks, such as:

 

 

difficulties in translating our courses into foreign languages;

 

 

international political and economic conditions;

 

 

changes in and/or compliance with government regulation in various countries;

 

 

trade barriers;

 

 

difficulty in staffing our foreign offices, and in training and retaining foreign instructors;

 

 

adverse income tax and transfer pricing consequences; and

 

 

potential costs associated with expansion into new territories or withdrawing from a territory.

 

19

 

 

We expect that international revenues will continue to be a significant portion of our total revenues. A lack of anticipation and response to the risks associated with international operations could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and stock price.  

 

Dependence on Key Personnel

 

If we are unable to recruit and retain qualified personnel, it could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and stock price. Our success depends in large part on the continued services of our executive officers, our senior managers and other key personnel. The loss of these people, especially without advance notice, could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations. It is also very important that we attract and retain highly skilled personnel, including course instructors, to accommodate growth, new course titles and to replace personnel who leave. Competition for qualified personnel can be intense, especially in information technology industries and/or in certain geographic areas, and there are a limited number of people with the requisite knowledge and experience. Under these conditions as well as our recent operating performance, we may be unable to recruit, train and retain qualified instructors and employees. If we cannot attract and retain qualified personnel, it could have a material adverse impact on our operating results and stock price. 

 

Our business depends largely on our ability to utilize knowledgeable instructors at our various locations. Our business is based on successfully attracting and utilizing professional instructors with the knowledge and ability to effectively deliver our course materials to participants. Because we deliver course events at multiple locations throughout the world, we rely on some of our instructors to travel to such locations to teach our courses. If we are not able to timely send our instructors to locations due to restrictive immigration laws or otherwise, then we may incur additional costs in delivering the course event or face limitations in the local and number of course events we present internationally.

 

Risks Associated with Intellectual Property

 

Events outside of our control could pose a threat to our intellectual property rights, as well as to our products and services. Our patents, trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights, and other intellectual property rights are important assets for us. Various events outside of our control could pose a threat to our intellectual property rights, as well as to our products and services. For example, effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which our courses are delivered. We cannot be certain that our means of protecting our proprietary rights will be adequate or that our competitors will not independently develop similar course titles or delivery methods unencumbered by our proprietary rights. If substantial unauthorized use of our products were to occur, our business and results of operations could be materially adversely impacted. We may also have to defend against claims that our current or future courses infringe on the proprietary rights of others, or have to pursue claims to protect our proprietary rights. Defending against and prosecuting these claims is costly and time consuming and could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

 

If substantial unauthorized use of our courses occurs or if we must defend against infringement claims, it could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and stock price. Our success depends in part on our ability to protect our intellectual property and confidential information. Our course development process and course titles are predominately proprietary and we rely primarily on a combination of statutory and common law copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, customer licensing agreements, employee and third-party nondisclosure agreements and other methods to protect those proprietary rights. Our course materials generally do not include any mechanisms to prohibit or prevent unauthorized use. As a result, someone could copy or otherwise obtain and use our course materials without authorization, either for educational use or to develop competing courses. In addition, we operate in countries that do not provide protection of proprietary rights to the same extent as the United States. Finally, our intellectual property rights will not prevent competitors from independently developing similar course titles or delivery methods. If substantial unauthorized use of our products were to occur, our results of operations and price of our common stock could be materially adversely impacted.

 

 We may also have to defend against claims that our current or future courses infringe on the proprietary rights of others. If such a claim succeeded, we might have to change or eliminate courses and could be required to pay damages or royalties. In addition, litigation over intellectual property rights, whether brought by us or by someone else, could be time-consuming and expensive, even if we were ultimately to succeed. Accordingly, defending and prosecuting these claims could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and stock price.

 

20

 

 

Although we seek to obtain patent protection for our innovations, it is possible we may not be able to protect some of these innovations. Changes in patent law, foreign or domestic, may have an impact on our ability to obtain patent protections. Furthermore, there is always the possibility, despite our efforts, that the scope of the protection gained will be insufficient or that an issued patent may be deemed invalid or unenforceable. We also seek to maintain certain intellectual property as trade secrets. The secrecy could be compromised by outside parties, or by our employees or former employees, which would cause us to lose the competitive advantage resulting from these trade secrets.  

  

Risks Associated with Laws and Regulations

 

Changes to laws and regulations can affect our operations and may limit our ability to operate in certain states and foreign jurisdictions or adversely impact our operating results. Providers of educational programs to the public must comply with many laws and regulations of Federal, state and international governments. Generally, we are exempt from this type of regulation because we contract with the employer of the participants in our courses, and we do not participate in any Federal, state or foreign student aid or loan programs. However, changes to state and foreign laws and regulations targeting educational providers could affect our operations in the future and could limit our ability to obtain authorization to operate in certain states. If we were found in violation of a state’s or foreign jurisdiction’s current or future licensing or regulatory requirements, then we could be subject to civil or criminal sanctions, including monetary penalties, and we could also be barred from providing educational services in that state or foreign jurisdiction. In addition, laws and regulatory decisions in many areas other than education could also adversely affect our operations. Complying with current or future legal requirements could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and stock price.

 

We are subject to tax audits by state, Federal and foreign jurisdictions. Such audits are to be expected and may result in adjustments as a result of the accretion of tax jurisdiction interpretations and changes in operational practices. Any such audits may result in additional taxes being assessed or in the refund of taxes previously paid. Such changes could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and stock price.

 

Risks Associated with Cyber Security

 

Security breaches and other disruptions could compromise our information and expose us to liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer. In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including intellectual property, our proprietary business information and that of our customers, suppliers and business partners, and personal identifiable information of our customers and employees, in our data centers and on our networks. The secure processing, maintenance and transmission of this information is critical to our operations and business strategy. Despite our security measures, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions. Any such breach could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information, regulatory penalties, disrupt our operations and the services we provide to customers, damage our reputation, and cause a loss of confidence in our products and services, which could adversely affect our business/operating margins, revenues and competitive position.

 

Dependence on Key Vendors

 

Interruptions of services or support from our key vendors could result in an adverse impact to our operations and financial results. Our business is dependent on the successful and uninterrupted functioning of our information technology and telecommunications systems and third-party servicers. The failure of these systems, or the termination of a third-party software license or service agreement on which any of these systems is based, could interrupt our operations. Because our information technology and telecommunications systems interface with and depend on third-party systems, we could experience service denials if demand for such services exceeds capacity or such third-party systems fail or experience interruptions. If significant, sustained or repeated, a system failure or service denial could compromise our ability to operate effectively, damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, and/or subject us to possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us. 

 

21

 

 

Control by Certain Stockholders

 

Our Chairman and Founder beneficially owns a majority of our outstanding shares, and therefore could have significant influence over our policies and affairs and is in a position to determine the outcome of corporate actions. As of December 1, 2017, Dr. Collins, our Chairman of the Board of Directors, beneficially owned (including shares owned with his wife, Mary Collins, a director of the Company) approximately 56.7% of our outstanding shares of common stock. Consequently, Dr. Collins and Mary Collins have significant influence over our policies and affairs and may be in a position to determine the outcome of certain corporate actions and transactions requiring stockholder approval. These may include, for example, the election of directors, the adoption of amendments to our corporate governing documents and the approval of business combination transactions, including the sale of the Company, whether by merger or sale of our assets.  

 

Dr. Collins and Mary Collins have made, and may make in the future, statements through amendments to the Schedule 13D filed by them with the SEC with respect to their beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock and any plans or proposals they may have with respect to the matters required by Schedule 13D. Any such statements may adversely impact the marketability of our common stock. 

 

Risks Associated with Possible Acquisitions and Other Strategic Transactions

 

If we cannot successfully implement any future acquisitions or other strategic transactions, it could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and stock price. On occasion, we evaluate business opportunities and other strategic transactions that appear to fit within our overall business strategy. We could decide to pursue one or more of these opportunities by acquisition or internal development. Acquisitions and other strategic transactions involve many risks, including:

 

 

the difficulty of integrating acquired technologies, operations and personnel with our existing operations;

 

 

the difficulty of developing and marketing new products and services;

 

 

the diversion of our management’s attention as a result of evaluating, negotiating and integrating acquisitions or new business ventures;

 

 

our exposure to unforeseen liabilities of acquired companies; and

 

 

the loss of key employees of an acquired operation.

  

In addition, an acquisition or other strategic transactions could adversely impact cash flows and/or operating results, and dilute stockholder interests, for many reasons, including:

 

 

charges to our income to reflect the amortization of acquired intangible assets;

 

 

write-offs for the impairment of the carrying value of goodwill or other intangible assets;

 

 

interest costs and debt service requirements for any debt incurred in connection with an acquisition or new business venture; and

 

 

any issuance of securities in connection with an acquisition or other strategic transactions that dilutes or lessens the rights of our current common stockholders.

 

We have had limited experience in executing and implementing strategic transactions. Although we have implemented other strategic transactions, those ventures have not always been successful, and we may not succeed in the future. The risks associated with acquisitions and other strategic transactions could have a material adverse impact on our operating results and stock price.

 

Risks Associated with Changing Economic Conditions

 

General domestic and international economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and common stock price. As a result of the current economic uncertainty and macro-economic challenges currently affecting the economy of the United States and other parts of the world, some of our customers may choose to delay or postpone purchases of courses from us until the economy and their businesses strengthen.

 

22

 

 

The United States government’s inability to agree on a federal budget may adversely impact our operations and financial results. We derive a significant amount of our revenues from the U.S. federal government. We believe the implementation by the U.S. federal government of the automatic spending cuts commonly referred to as “Sequestration” in 2013 had a significant negative impact on our North American operations as our government customers faced uncertainty over whether the amount of funds allotted for training was actually available. We believe that this uncertainty then and in the years that have followed led to lower enrollments and cancellation of existing enrollments from the government sector and to some degree from those of our commercial customers that rely heavily on government contracts. Currently the U.S. federal government is operating under a Continuing Resolution and is under the first year of a new Presidential administration, both of which can lead to government agencies using our services not being allocated sufficient funds. Such agencies may then not be able to continue using our services, which could adversely impact our operations and financial results.

 

United States government action or inaction with respect to the continuing budget deficit could adversely impact our operations and financial results. The inability of the United States Congress to enact a budget in a fiscal year, another sequestration, and/or another shutdown of the United States Government could adversely impact demand for our services by limiting the funding available to many of our customers, particularly those in the government sector. Various entities of the United States government and United States government contractors, on a combined basis, account for more than fifteen percent of our business. Implementation of major legislative reductions to the federal budget could reduce, delay or cancel funding used by our government and government contractor customers to purchase our services, which would have a material adverse impact on our operations and financial results.  

 

Domestic and/or International Economic Downturns. A significant part of our revenues comes from Fortune 1000-level companies, their international equivalents, and government organizations. During weak economic conditions, our sales grow more slowly or can even diminish. If the domestic and/or international economy were to continue to weaken, the demand for our services could decline, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and stock price.

 

Industry-Specific Slowdowns. Our customers generally operate in the finance, computer, communications, electronics, systems integration, aerospace, government and military, manufacturing, and energy sectors. When one or more of these industries experiences a slowdown, it can have a material adverse effect on our operating results and stock price.

 

Globalization Issues. Our operations are concentrated in Europe and North America, which have traditionally been the centers of IT development and implementation. In recent years, there has been increasing IT activity in other parts of the world, such as China and India. If this trend adversely affects IT jobs in regions in which we have our principal operations, it could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and stock price.

 

Anti-Takeover Provisions

 

Certain provisions of our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, our Bylaws and Delaware law could adversely impact the interests of our stockholders. Certain provisions of our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, our Bylaws, as amended, and Delaware law could, together or separately, discourage, delay or prevent a third party from acquiring us, even if doing so might benefit our stockholders. These provisions may also affect the price investors would receive for their shares of our common stock. Some examples of these provisions in our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, and Bylaws, as amended, are:

 

 

the division of our board of directors into three classes;

 

 

the right of our board of directors to issue preferred stock with rights and privileges that are senior to the common stock, without prior stockholder approval;

 

 

certain limitations of the rights of stockholders to call a special meeting of stockholders; and

 

 

the prohibition of stockholder actions by written consent.

 

23

 

 

Natural Disasters, External Strikes, Acts of War or Terrorism and Other External Events

 

Since our founding in 1974, various natural disasters, external labor disruptions, acts of war or terrorism and other adverse external factors have from time to time impaired our ability to conduct our business, resulted in the loss of revenue or otherwise affected our operating results. When these or other external events occur in the future, they could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and stock price.

 

Natural Disasters. Natural disasters can affect our business. For example, severe weather has at times prevented our course participants from traveling to our courses. In these situations, we try to transfer the course participants to later courses, but we may still lose some revenue.

 

External Strikes. We have had to react to postal, transportation, and other strikes in the countries where we operate. Transportation strikes can make it difficult for our course participants or our instructors to reach course facilities. Although we try to employ strategies to mitigate the impact of external strikes, these alternative means are rarely completely effective and generally increase our costs, which could adversely affect our operating results.

 

Acts of War or Terrorism. Threats or acts of war or terrorism can adversely affect our business. Terrorist attacks in the United States, Europe and in other countries and continuing hostilities in the Middle East and elsewhere have created significant instability and uncertainty in the world. These and future events may have a material adverse effect on world financial markets, including financial markets in the United States. In addition, threats or acts of war or terrorism can cause course participants to be reluctant regarding or prevented from traveling to our course facilities, thereby resulting in lower attendance rates. Additionally, our suppliers and service providers may be unable to provide required services or materials. These impacts could happen after we have committed to all the costs of our course, so that we would be unable to quickly adjust our cost structure to reflect the changes in revenues caused by these events, which could materially and adversely affect our operating results and stock price.  

 

Other External Factors. Other factors outside our control can affect our operations, including those related to our suppliers and service providers. For example, disruptions of telephone networks can prevent customers from enrolling in our courses; disruptions in transportation services can prevent customers from reaching our facilities, and power outages can prevent us from delivering courses. 

 

Item  1B.        UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

 

None.

 

Item 2.            PROPERTIES.

 

Our corporate headquarters are located at 13650 Dulles Technology Drive, Herndon, Virginia 20171. This facility, under lease for nine more years as of September 29, 2017, houses our corporate headquarters, as well as the sales, administrative and operations groups of our U.S. subsidiary and a twelve classroom Education Center. We lease or rent all of our other offices and Education Center classroom facilities. These other leases expire at various dates over the next five years.

  

We believe that our facilities are adequate and suitable for our needs. In general, at current attendee levels, we have excess capacity at most of our Education Centers. Accordingly, we have been seeking to address this excess capacity by reducing the size of some of our facilities and by renting excess classrooms. During fiscal year 2016, our leases for space in Los Angeles, CA and Chicago, IL expired and we did not replace the capacity of these facilities. During fiscal year 2017, the lease for our New York facility expired and we did not renew this lease. Instead, we are continuing to offer courses in New York under a five year agreement with a third party that provides us with ten classrooms at their location in New York City. The lease for our Alexandria, VA facility was also set to expire at the end of fiscal year 2017, however in October 2017, we amended the lease for this facility to reduce the square footage leased from 14,037 square feet to 8,060 square feet and the number of classrooms from seven to five, as well as extend the lease term through December 31, 2022, provided that Learning Tree has the right to terminate the lease earlier, as of November 30, 2019. Similarly, the lease for our Rockville, MD facility was also set to expire on October 31, 2017, and we amended the lease for this facility in October 2017 to reduce the square footage leased from 25,976 square feet to 7,011 square feet and the number of classrooms from eleven to five, as well as extend the lease term through February 29, 2020. We have also assigned, through the end of the term, the leases for two floors of our London Education Center to a third party as of the end of fiscal year 2017 and will retain a lease for the ground and basement floors of the London Education Center.

 

   

We present our classroom courses at Learning Tree Education Centers in New York City, the Washington, D.C. area (four locations), Ottawa, Toronto, London, Stockholm, and Tokyo, as well as in other rented facilities in those and other cities worldwide as well as at our clients’ facilities.

  

24

 

 

The following table contains certain information regarding Learning Tree Education Centers and offices at September 29, 2017:   

 

Location

   

Number of

   

Total Area in

   

(Metropolitan Area)

Function(s)

 

Classrooms

   

Square Feet

   

New York, NY

Education Center

    10    

Not Applicable

 

(a)

Washington, DC area

Education Centers (4 sites)

    38       66,134  

(b)

Herndon & Chantilly, VA

Office (2 locations)

    0       36,831    

London, England

Education Center & Office

    13       20,236  

(c)

Leatherhead, England

Office

    0       19,464    

Ottawa, Canada

Education Center & Office

    6       13,742    

Toronto, Canada

Education Center

    10       17,207    

Stockholm, Sweden

Education Center & Office

    7       11,410    

Tokyo, Japan

Education Center & Office

    1       2,683    
        85       187,707    

 

 

(a)

Classrooms provided by a third party under a five year service agreement.

  (b)

Classroom locations in Alexandria, Reston and Herndon, VA and in Rockville, MD. The Alexandria, VA Education Center will be reduced to 8,060 square feet with five classrooms in fiscal year 2018. The Rockville, MD Education Center will be reduced to 7,011 square feet with five classrooms in fiscal year 2018. The total area leased in the Washington, DC area will be reduced from 66,134 square feet to 41,192 square feet after the Alexandria and Rockville Education Centers are reduced in size.

 

(c)

Reflects the reduction in square footage after the assignment of two floors to a third party at the end of fiscal year 2017.

 

 

 

Item  3.            LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

 

We are not involved in any pending or threatened legal proceedings, other than routine legal proceedings and claims incidental to our business, that we believe could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

Item 4.             MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE.

 

Not Applicable.

 

25

 

 

PART II

 

Item  5.            MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

 

Price Range of Common Stock

 

Our common stock trades on the OTCQX under the symbol “LTRE.” Prior to July 23, 2015, our common stock traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the range of high and low closing sales prices for our common stock:

 

   

High

   

Low

 

Fiscal Year 2016

               

First Quarter

  $ 1.43     $ 0.73  

Second Quarter

    0.90       0.60  

Third Quarter

    1.35       0.70  

Fourth Quarter

    1.87       1.12  
                 

Fiscal Year 2017

               

First Quarter

  $ 2.90     $ 1.60  

Second Quarter

    2.95       1.82  

Third Quarter

    2.55       1.95  

Fourth Quarter

    3.00       1.95  

 

 

As of November 28, 2017, the number of holders of our Common Stock was 455, consisting of 42 holders of record and 413 stockholders whose stock is held by a bank, broker or other nominee.

 

Dividends

 

We did not pay any dividends in fiscal year 2017 or fiscal year 2016. We have no plans to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The declaration and payment of dividends are subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and to compliance with applicable laws. Any determination as to the payment of dividends in the future will depend upon, among other things, general business conditions, the effect such payment would have on our financial condition and other factors that our Board of Directors may in the future consider to be relevant.

 

Sales of Unregistered Securities

 

We did not make any unregistered sales of our securities during fiscal year 2017 or fiscal year 2016.

 

Purchases of Equity Securities

 

We did not repurchase any shares during fiscal years 2017 and 2016.

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans  

 

The following table provides information as of September 29, 2017 regarding securities issued and to be issued under our equity compensation plans that were in effect during fiscal year 2017:

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan Category

 

Number of Securities

to be Issued Upon

Exercise of

Outstanding Options,

Warrants and Rights

   

Weighted-Average

Exercise Price of

Outstanding Options,

Warrants and Rights

   

Number of Securities

Remaining Available

for Future Issuance

Under Equity

Compensation Plan

(Excluding Securities

Reflected in the first

Column)(1)

 

Equity compensation plan approved by security holders

    350,000     $ 1.32       0  

Equity compensation plan not approved by security holders

    300,000       1.23       0  

Total

    650,000     $ 1.28       0  

 

(1) In December 2016, our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (“2007 Plan”) expired and no additional shares are available for grant under the 2007 Plan.

 

For a description of our equity compensation plan and our equity grants, see Note 6 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

 

Item 6.             SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

 

           Not Required for a Smaller Reporting Company

   

26

 

 

 

Item 7.             MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

 

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations includes many forward-looking statements. For cautions about relying on such forward-looking statements, please refer to the section entitled “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this Report immediately prior to “Part I-Item 1”.

 

OVERVIEW

 

Nature of the Business. Learning Tree International, Inc. is a leading worldwide provider to business and government organizations for the training and workforce development of their information technology (“IT”) professionals and managers. Since our founding in 1974, we have provided high-quality, predominantly vendor-independent, training to more than 2.5 million IT professionals and managers. In fiscal year 2017, while presenting courses in 39 countries, we trained 53,170 course participants from approximately 4,700 organizations, including large national and multinational companies, government organizations, and small and medium-size companies.

 

We offer a broad, predominately proprietary, library of intensive instructor-led courses from one to five days in length, which at September 29, 2017 comprised 318 different course titles representing 5,889 hours of training, including 159 multi-day IT course titles, 76 multi-day management course titles, and 83 one-day course titles. Learning Tree courses provide education and training across a wide range of technical and management disciplines, including operating systems, databases, computer networks, computer and network security, web development, programming languages, software engineering, open source applications, project management, business skills, leadership and professional development. We now also partner with other organizations to broaden the breadth of training we can offer to IT organizations, with the objective of enabling us to meet an organization’s complete workforce needs. In terms of vendor partners, we reached agreement with Microsoft to become a Microsoft approved training partner, whereby we now offer Microsoft approved courses. This also allows us to accept Microsoft training vouchers and eliminates the need for us to maintain duplicate course content. We have also begun offering our customers the ability to take course titles we do not have in our course library from approved “Partner” providers. Through these “Partner” providers, we are able to offer courses in a number of different vendor technologies and products, including Cisco, Adobe, IBM, Red Hat, VMware, Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto Networks, and Amazon Web Services.

 

In addition to training, we offer a suite of Workforce Optimization Solutions to support an IT organization’s life-cycle of workforce development needs. These solutions help ensure that an organization’s investment in training is relevant and leveraged to improving overall organization performance. The range of solutions includes helping organizations define their job roles, assessing the current skills of the staff, providing coaching and mentoring of staff, offering blended learning solutions in which we use different training modalities to improve learning, and even serving as an outsourced provider of an organization’s learning and training requirements.

 

We market and present our courses and solutions through locally staffed operations in the United States, the United Kingdom (“UK”), Canada, Sweden and Japan. In August, 2017, the Company terminated its License Agreement, dated March 3, 2015, with Educinvest SPRL, which termination became effective immediately. The License Agreement was entered into with Educinvest at the time of the sale of the Company’s subsidiary in France and provided for the license of courses by Educinvest in France. The French market is now being served by our UK operation while the Company is evaluating other business opportunities that may be available to it as a result of the termination of the License Agreement. In fiscal year 2017, we generated approximately 37% of our revenues outside of the United States. We coordinate, plan and deliver our courses at our own education centers, hotels, conference facilities and customer sites worldwide. Our proprietary live online learning platform, Learning Tree AnyWare™, allows individuals located anywhere in the world to use their Internet browser to participate online in instructor-led classes being conducted live in Learning Tree Education Centers, at customer locations, or at other specially equipped facilities. 

 

We use a well-defined systematic approach to develop and update the Learning Tree course library so as to provide training that is immediately applicable by course participants to their work in a broad range of applications and industries. After assessing market need, courses may be translated into Swedish and Japanese. We design our own proprietary courses to provide participants an unbiased perspective regarding software and hardware products and the ability to compare and integrate multiple platforms and technologies from various vendors. All Learning Tree courses are highly interactive and incorporate extensive hands-on exercises or case study workshops. Our IT courses are designed around highly practical hands-on exercises that provide participants with extensive in-class experience mastering the tools and techniques they can apply immediately upon returning to their jobs. Similarly, many of our management courses utilize our innovative proprietary learning methodology that provides an environment in which course participants learn entirely by doing through extensive multi-media simulations. Throughout these courses, participants gain extensive experience applying new management skills in life-like, challenging situations, within the confines of the classroom and under the guidance of an expert instructor. As a result, course participants can achieve greater mastery of effective management techniques as well as the confidence needed to apply them, and thus return to their jobs both ready and willing to immediately apply their expanded skills in their workplaces. Our proprietary course development process also allows us to customize our courses to specific customer requirements for delivery at their sites.

 

27

 

 

We had more than 650 instructors as of September 29, 2017, who are practicing professionals with expert subject knowledge, and who average over 20 years of “hands-on, real world” experience. Learning Tree instructors teach an average of approximately 7 course events per year on an “as-needed” basis. When they are not teaching, Learning Tree instructors use and hone their IT and management skills either as full-time employees for other companies or as independent consultants.  

 

We have structured our business so that over half of our course delivery costs are variable and depend primarily upon the number of course events conducted. We schedule our course events throughout the year based on our assessment of demand. Since Learning Tree instructors typically work full-time or as consultants for other business and industry employers, or in the case of management instructors as industry consultants and facilitators, they teach our course events as needed and thus, our instructor-related costs are largely variable. Expenses associated with our own Education Centers and course equipment are largely fixed.

 

We adjust our expenditures for sales and marketing depending on our strategic objectives, which generally include an assessment of our expectations for influencing future customer demand, market conditions and other factors. However, if our expectations regarding the results of our marketing efforts prove to be wrong, any significant revenue shortfall would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

 

We continue to emphasize excellence in training and developing IT professionals and managers from government and commercial organizations around the world. We believe that quality is a significant differentiator in the eyes of our customers, and that our proven long-term record of exceptional performance is a reason for our clients’ continued loyalty. Of our 100 largest clients in fiscal year 2012, 99 were still our clients five years later in fiscal year 2017. We continue our emphasis on excellence by focusing on our core strengths: our expert instructors, proprietary content library, state-of-the-art classrooms, application of technology to education, and worldwide course delivery systems.

 

Going Concern. Our registered independent public accounting firm has issued a report on our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2017 that included an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. This means unless we are able to reduce our dependence on our remaining cash and cash equivalents to fund operations and improve our overall liquidity that there is substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as an ongoing business. As discussed in more detail in Item 1. Business and under Liquidity in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis, the Company is continuing to execute its business strategies, its comprehensive cost reduction program and entered into a borrowing arrangement with Action Capital in order to improve our overall profitability, cash flows from operations and liquidity. While the Company believes that these efforts will result in improving our liquidity and our continued operation, there is no assurance that we will be successful in executing some or all of these strategies at levels necessary to address the Company’s cash flow and liquidity needs and continue as a going concern. As a result, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as an on-going business. The Company is continuing to evaluate its other strategic options, including obtaining additional sources of capital and financing in order to improve its liquidity as discussed below.

 

 Financing Agreement. On January 12, 2017, the Company entered into a Financing Agreement with Action Capital that provides the Company with access to borrow through advances of funds up to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $3.0 million (the “Maximum Amount”). Pursuant to the Financing Agreement, the amount advanced to the Company will be based upon an agreed advance rate of up to 85% of the net amount of certain customer accounts receivable of the Company that are approved by Action Capital and assigned to it as collateral. The amounts advanced under the Financing Agreement will also be secured by the Company’s other accounts receivables from its U.S. operations.  Under the Financing Agreement, the Company is required to pay Action Capital (i) interest on the outstanding advances at a rate equal to the prime rate of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. in effect on the last business day of the prior month plus 1.75%, (ii) a monthly fee equal to 0.70% of the outstanding advances as of the last day of the month, and (iii) a fee of 0.25% of the Maximum Amount, which is payable to Action Capital on the date the Financing Agreement is signed and every 90 days thereafter until the Financing Agreement is terminated and all amounts advanced and other obligations to Action Capital have been fully paid and satisfied. The Financing Agreement does not have any set term and either party may, for any reason, terminate the Financing Agreement by providing written notice. As a result, if Action Capital were to terminate the Financing Agreement and we did not have an alternative line of credit or other source of capital available, then we would have to rely upon our cash and cash equivalents for our working capital needs, which may not be sufficient. See Notes 12 and 14 of the consolidated audited financial statements and Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Form 10-K for more information about this Financing Agreement.   

 

28

 

 

Strategic Initiatives. Learning Tree has been and is continuing to explore strategic options available to it to enhance stockholder value. The Company is continuing to evaluate all strategic options available to it, including those to obtain additional sources of capital and financing in order to improve its liquidity. There is no assurance that additional capital and/or financing will be available to the Company, and even if available, whether it will be on terms acceptable to us or in amounts required. Learning Tree does not expect to comment further or update the market with any additional information on the strategic options it is evaluating, unless and until its Board of Directors deems disclosure appropriate or necessary. 

 

 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following table summarizes our consolidated statements of operations for the periods indicated expressed as percentages of revenues: 

 

   

Fiscal Year Ended

 
   

September 29,

2017

   

September 30,

2016

 

Revenues

    100.0 %     100.0 %

Cost of revenues

    57.0 %     61.5 %

Gross profit

    43.0 %     38.5 %

Operating expenses:

               

Course development

    4.1 %     6.3 %

Sales and marketing

  19.1 %     22.0 %

General and administrative

    21.1 %     23.2 %

Restructuring charge

    0.5 %     2.3 %
      44.8 %     53.8 %
                 

Loss from operations before other operating items

    (1.8 )%     (15.3 )%
                 

Other (expense) income:

               

Interest (expense) income, net

    (0.1 )%     0.0 %

Foreign exchange (losses) gains

    (0.4 )%     0.3 %
      (0.5 )%     0.3 %
                 

Loss from operation before provision for income taxes

    (2.3 )%     (15.0 )%
                 

Provision for income taxes

    0.7 %     0.5 %

Net loss

    (3.0 )%     (15.5 )%

 

 FISCAL YEAR 2017 COMPARED WITH FISCAL YEAR 2016

 

We follow a 52- or 53-week fiscal year. Our year-end and quarter-end dates are on the Friday nearest the end of the calendar quarter. Accordingly, our fiscal year 2017 ended on September 29, 2017 and our fiscal year 2016 ended on September 30, 2016. Our fiscal years 2017 and 2016 both consisted of 52 weeks.

 

In fiscal year 2017, our worldwide revenues from operations decreased to $70.7 million from $81.6 million in fiscal year 2016. Loss from operations was $(1.3) million in fiscal year 2017 compared to $(12.5) million in fiscal year 2016. The loss from operations for fiscal years 2017 and 2016 includes $0.4 million and $1.9 million, respectively, in restructuring charges. Net loss for fiscal year 2017 was $(2.1) million compared to $(12.7) million in fiscal year 2016.

 

Revenues. Our fiscal year 2017 revenues from operations decreased by 13.4% compared to fiscal year 2016. The decrease in revenues primarily resulted from a 10.2% decrease in average revenue per participant, and a 3.5% decrease in the number of course participants. The decrease in the average revenue per participant was caused primarily by lower average revenue per participant resulting from implementation of periodic pricing promotions to attract new course attendees, and changes in foreign exchange rates, which negatively impacted revenues by approximately 2.3%. The decrease in the number of course participants was due to lower demand worldwide for our public open enrollment courses.

  

29

 

 

Revenues in North America of $50.9 million in fiscal 2017 decreased 14.1% compared to $59.3 million in fiscal year 2016. For our North America operations, average revenue per participant decreased 5.1% while the number of participants decreased 9.6% year over year. The decrease in average revenue per participant year over year was primarily the result of lower average revenue from the implementation of periodic pricing promotions to attract new course attendees. Changes in exchange rates negatively impacted year over year Canadian revenues by $0.1 million or 0.2% of total North American revenues. Revenues from the U.S. government and government contractors that purchased courses under our government contract schedules totaled $17.4 million for fiscal year 2017 compared to $19.0 million for fiscal year 2016.

 

Revenues from our European operations decreased 12.7% to $17.4 million in fiscal year 2017 from $19.9 million in fiscal year 2016. Average revenue per participant decreased by 23.3% which was partially offset by a 13.8% increase in participants. The decrease in average revenue per participant was primarily the result of lower average revenue from the implementation of periodic pricing promotions to attract the additional course attendees. Changes in exchange rates negatively impacted year over year European revenues by $2.0 million or 11.3% of total European revenues.

    

 

Cost of Revenues. Our cost of revenues from operations primarily includes the variable costs of course instructors and their travel expenses, course materials, refreshments and freight, and the fixed costs of course equipment and classroom facilities. During fiscal year 2017, we presented 4,543 events, 8.5% less than the 4,963 events during fiscal year 2016. The average number of participants per event increased to 11.7 in fiscal year 2017 from 11.1 in fiscal year 2016. Our cost of revenues for fiscal year 2017 decreased to $40.3 million from $50.2 million in fiscal year 2017. Our cost of revenues as a percentage of our revenues decreased to 57.0% for fiscal year 2017 from 61.5% in fiscal year 2016. The reduction in cost of revenues for fiscal year 2017 when compared to fiscal year 2016 is the combined result of our cost reduction program, reduction in fixed real estate costs and the lower number of events.

 

The decrease in cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues in fiscal year 2017 primarily reflects the 16.7% decrease in average cost per participant, which was partially offset by a 10.2% decrease in average revenue per participant. As a result, gross profit declined 3.4% to $30.4 million in fiscal year 2017 from $31.4 million in fiscal year 2016.

 

Changes in exchange rates do not materially affect our gross profit percentages since exchange rates have essentially the same impact on both revenues and cost of revenues in any time period.

 

Course Development Expenses. We maintain a disciplined process to develop new courses and update our existing courses. All costs incurred in that process, principally for internal product development staff and for subject matter experts, are expensed when incurred and are included in course development expenses. During fiscal year 2017, after a re-evaluation of our course development process, we partnered with Microsoft to use Microsoft’s content where available instead of incurring the expense to create and update our Microsoft courseware. Content used from the Microsoft partnering arrangement will result in the per attendee cost for this content being expensed as cost of revenues when the event occurs.

 

During fiscal year 2017, course development expenses were 4.1% of revenues compared to 6.3% during fiscal year 2016. In fiscal year 2017, we decreased our overall spending on course development to $2.9 million compared with $5.1 million in fiscal year 2016. In addition, in fiscal year 2017, we introduced 53 new multi-day IT course titles and 10 new multi-day management course titles compared to 27 multi-day IT and five multi-day management course titles in fiscal year 2016. In fiscal year 2017, many of these new titles were not developed by Learning Tree, but rather were obtained by other providers (i.e., hardware and software vendors, certification organizations, training course providers).

 

At the end of fiscal year 2017, the Learning Tree library of instructor-led courses numbered 318 titles, comprising 5,889 hours of training, compared with 349 titles at the end of fiscal year 2016. The decrease in the number of titles in fiscal year 2017 reflected the net effect of reducing the number of one-day course titles to 83 and adding 63 new multi-day titles while retiring 38 titles. In general, titles are retired when the profits they generate no longer justify the ongoing cost of marketing them and maintaining their content. Thus, we may or may not develop more titles than we retire in any period.

 

At September 29, 2017, we had 159 multi-day IT titles in our course library, compared with 140 at the end of fiscal year 2016. Our library of multi-day management titles numbered 76 as of September 29, 2017, compared with 70 management titles at the end of fiscal year 2016. Our library of one-day courses numbered 83 at September 29, 2017, compared to 139 one-day courses at the end of fiscal year 2016.

 

Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and marketing expenses primarily include the cost of designing, producing and distributing direct mail and media advertisements, marketing e-mails and our website; compensation and travel-related costs for sales and marketing personnel; and the cost of information systems to support these activities. For fiscal year 2017 we have eliminated our direct mail course catalog advertising program as part of our comprehensive cost reduction program.

 

30

 

 

Our sales and marketing expenses were 19.1% of revenues in fiscal year 2017 compared to 22.0% of revenues in fiscal year 2016. Sales and marketing expenses decreased to $13.5 million in fiscal year 2017 from $17.9 million in fiscal year 2016. The overall decrease of $4.5 million was primarily due to decreases in direct mail marketing costs as a result of eliminating all direct mail activity and lower sales costs due to lower revenue when compared to the prior year.

 

General and Administrative Expenses. Our general and administrative expenses were 21.1% of revenues in fiscal year 2017 compared to 23.2% of revenues in fiscal year 2016. General and administrative expenses were $14.9 million in fiscal year 2017 compared to $18.9 million in fiscal year 2016 primarily as a result of the comprehensive cost reduction program.

     

Restructuring Charge. In fiscal year 2016, we recognized a $1.9 million restructuring charge related to our Reston, Virginia facility. We determined this facility was surplus classroom space as a result of the classroom space that became available in fiscal year 2016 at our new facility in Herndon, Virginia. In fiscal year 2017 we adjusted the restructuring charge to increase it by an additional $0.4 million as a result of changes in estimates used to calculate the original charge.

 

Other Income (Expense), Net. Other (expense), net in fiscal year 2017 was ($0.3) million compared to other income of $0.2 million in fiscal year 2016. The difference was primarily due to foreign exchange losses in fiscal year 2017 compared to foreign exchange gains in fiscal year 2016.

 

Income Taxes. In fiscal year 2017, our income tax provision was $0.5 million compared to $0.4 million in fiscal year 2016. Our effective rate for fiscal year 2017 was (28.5) % compared to (3.4) % in fiscal year 2016. The effective rate for fiscal year 2017 is primarily related to minimum U.S. state taxes, state audit assessments for prior years, foreign withholding taxes, and the income tax expense of our foreign subsidiaries. The effective rate for fiscal year 2016 was primarily related to minimum U.S. state taxes, state audit assessments for prior years, foreign withholding taxes, true ups of the actual 2015 return to provision estimates for U.S. taxes, and the income tax expense of our foreign subsidiaries. In fiscal year 2012, we established a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets in the United States due to current year and projected future pre-tax book losses. This valuation allowance has been maintained to date. Management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes and in determining whether any deferred tax assets will be realized in full or in part. When it is more likely than not that all or some portion of specific deferred tax assets such as net operating losses or foreign tax credit carry-forwards will not be realized, a valuation allowance must be established for the amount of the deferred tax assets that may not be realized where realization is based on our ability to generate sufficient future taxable income.

 

GEOGRAPHIC DATA

 

Learning Tree Education Centers are located in the U.S., Canada, the UK, Sweden and Japan. The North America operations recorded revenues of $50.9 million in fiscal year 2017 compared to revenues of $59.3 million in fiscal year 2016. Revenues from our European continuing operations were $17.4 million in fiscal year 2017 compared to $19.9 million in fiscal year 2016. Our Asian operations recorded revenues of $2.3 million in fiscal year 2017, the same as in fiscal year 2016. See Note 9 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for further information on segment reporting.

 

On March 3, 2015, we entered into an Agreement (“Agreement”) to sell our subsidiary in France, Learning Tree International S.A., to Educinvest SPRL for consideration of € 1 (one Euro) and entered into a License Agreement with Educinvest SPRL for use of the Learning Tree brand and course content. The transaction was consummated on the same date that the Agreement was signed by the parties. In August, 2017, the Company terminated its License Agreement with Educinvest SPRL, which termination became effective immediately. The French market is now being served by our UK operation.

 

Although our consolidated financial statements are stated in U.S. dollars, all of our subsidiaries other than in the United States have functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Gains and losses arising from the translation of the balance sheets of our subsidiaries from the functional currencies to U.S. dollars are reported as adjustments to stockholders’ equity. Fluctuations in exchange rates may also have an effect on our results of operations. Since both revenues and expenses are generally denominated in the subsidiary’s local currency, changes in exchange rates that have an adverse effect on our foreign revenues are partially offset by a favorable effect on our foreign expenses, and vice versa. The impact of future exchange rates on our results of operations cannot be accurately predicted. To date, we have not sought to hedge the risks associated with fluctuations in exchange rates and therefore we continue to be subject to such risks. In the future, we may undertake such hedging transactions. There can be no assurance that any hedging techniques we might implement would be successful in eliminating or reducing the effects of currency fluctuations.

 

31

 

 

INFLATION

 

Inflation did not have a significant impact on our net sales, revenues or income from continuing operations in fiscal years 2017 and 2016.

 

 

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

 

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which supercedes most existing revenue recognition models that require revenue guidance under GAAP. The standard is a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires revenue to be recognized in a manner to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five step process to achieve its core principle and, in doing so, more judgement and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than required under existing GAAP. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU 2015-14”), which defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year to fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Accordingly, the standard is effective for us on September 30, 2018 using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach. We have yet to determine which transition approach to use and have just started to evaluate the impact that the updated standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” (“ASU 2014-15”). The standard requires management to evaluate, at each interim and annual reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued, and provide related disclosures. ASU 2014-15 is effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. As such, we have adopted ASU 2014-15 effective with the start of our fiscal year beginning September 30, 2017. We have and will continue to evaluate, at each interim and annual reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued, and provide related disclosures.

 

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (“ASU 2015-17”). The standard requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet rather than being separated into current and noncurrent. ASU 2015-17 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted and the standard may be applied retrospectively or on a prospective basis to all deferred tax assets and liabilities. Accordingly, we have adopted ASU 2015-17 with the start of our fiscal year beginning September 30, 2017 and will result in our deferred tax assets and liabilities being classified as non-current on our consolidated balance sheet.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to recognize an ROU asset and liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months.  Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement.  The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available.  Accordingly, the standard is effective for us on September 28, 2019.  Early adoption is permitted.  While we are still evaluating the impact of our pending adoption of the new standard on our consolidated financial statements, we expect that upon adoption we will recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities and that the amounts could be material.

 

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”). The standard is intended to simplify several areas of accounting for share-based compensation arrangements, including the income tax impact, classification on the statement of cash flows and forfeitures. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. Accordingly, we have adopted ASU 2016-09 effective with the start of our fiscal year beginning September 30, 2017. The adoption of ASU No. 2016-09 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (“ASU 2016-15”). The standard clarifies how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. Accordingly, the new standard is effective for us on September 30, 2018 using a retrospective approach. We believe that this standard will not have any significant impact on our consolidated financial statements. 

 

32

 

 

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash - a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force” (“ASU 2016-18”). The standard requires restricted cash and cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents on the statement cash flows. The new standard is expected to be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. Accordingly, the new standard would be effective for us on September 30, 2018 using a retrospective approach, and will result in our restricted cash being included with cash and cash equivalents to reflect total cash on our statement of cash flows. We are evaluating whether we will early adopt the new standard. 

 

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including the Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the SEC did not, or management believes will not, have a material impact on our present or future consolidated financial statements. 

 

QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Historically, our quarterly operating results have fluctuated, which is expected to continue in the future. Typically, our first and fourth fiscal quarters have higher revenues and income from operations than do our second and third fiscal quarters. Fluctuations in quarterly results are caused by many factors including: (i) the frequency of course events; (ii) the number of weeks during which courses can be conducted in a quarter; (iii) the timing, timely delivery, frequency and size of and response to our direct mail marketing and advertising campaigns; (iv) the timing of our introduction of new course titles; (v) the mix between course events held at customer sites and course events held in our education centers and hotels due to differing gross profit margins; (vi) competitive forces within markets we serve; (vii) our ability to attract customers and meet their expectations; (viii) currency fluctuations and other risks inherent in international operations; (ix) natural disasters, external strikes, acts of war or terrorism and other external factors; and (x) general economic conditions and industry-specific slowdowns.

 

Fluctuations in quarter-to-quarter results can also occur as a result of differences in timing of marketing and development expenditures and for seasonal factors. Our quarterly revenues and income fluctuate due to the seasonal spending patterns of our customers, which are affected by factors including: (i) cyclic or one-time budgetary considerations; (ii) factors specific to their business or industry; (iii) weather, holiday and vacation considerations; and (iv) other considerations. Our customers are widely diversified across industries and geographies, with varying fiscal years including many whose fiscal years coincide with the United States government’s September 30 budget year, many who are on the calendar year, and many whose fiscal years coincide with the UK and Canadian governments’ March 31 budget year. We also see seasonal variations in our business as a result of other factors, including summer vacations, especially in Europe.

 

We use the 52/53-week fiscal year method to better align our external financial reporting with the manner in which we operate our business. Under this method, each fiscal quarter ends on the Friday closest to the end of the calendar quarter. Since all courses have a duration of five days or less, and all courses begin and end within the same calendar week, under the 52/53 week fiscal year method all revenues and related direct costs for each course event are recognized in the week and the fiscal quarter in which the event takes place. In most years, including fiscal years 2017 and 2016, each fiscal quarter has 13 weeks.

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

Our primary sources of liquidity at September 29, 2017 included cash and cash equivalents on hand of $5.1 million and the Financing Agreement with Action Capital, which provides the Company with access to borrow up to $3.0 million. Pursuant to the Financing Agreement, the amount advanced to the Company is based upon an agreed advance rate of up to 85% of the net amount of certain customer accounts receivable from our U.S. operations that are approved by Action Capital and assigned to it as collateral. The Financing Agreement does not have a set term and either party may, for any reason, terminate the Financing Agreement by providing written notice. As a result, if Action Capital terminated the Financing Agreement and we did not have an alternative line of credit or other source of capital available, we would have to rely upon cash from operations and cash and cash equivalents for our capital needs, which may not be sufficient. See Note 12 of the Consolidated Audited Financial Statements and Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Form 10-K for more information about this Financing Agreement.

 

33

 

 

 Cash Flows. Our cash and cash equivalents balance decreased by $3.4 million to $5.1 million at September 29, 2017 from $8.5 million at September 30, 2016. The decrease occurred primarily as a result of using $3.2 million of cash in operations for fiscal year 2017.

 

 

   

Fiscal Year Ended

         

 

 

September 29,

2017

   

September 30,

2016

   

Net Change

 

Cash used in operating activities

  $ (3,222 )   $ (8,991 )   $ 5,769  

Cash used in investing activities

    (27 )     (373 )     346  

Cash used in financing activities

    (88 )     0       (88 )

Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

    (123 )     (32 )     (91 )
                         

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

  $ (3,460 )   $ (9,396 )   $ 5,936  

 

Cash used in operating activities totaled $3.2 million in fiscal year 2017 as compared to cash used in operating activities of $9.0 million in fiscal year 2016. Cash used in investing activities totaled less than $0.1 million during fiscal year 2017 compared to $0.4 million in fiscal year 2016. The decrease in cash used in investing activities was primarily due to lower capital expenditures for purchases of equipment and other capital assets during fiscal year 2017. Cash used in financing activities totaled $0.1 million in fiscal year 2017 compared to zero in fiscal year 2016. This change was primarily due to payments on a capital equipment lease. The effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents during fiscal year 2017 was ($0.1) million, compared to less than ($0.1) million in fiscal year 2016.  

 

Liquidity. As of and for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2017, we reported an accumulated deficit of $17.4 million compared to $15.3 million at the end of fiscal year 2016. In addition, we have also reported negative cash flow from operations in 2017 and for the previous five fiscal years as our revenues have declined each year during this period. At September 29, 2017, our capital resources consisted of cash and cash equivalents of $5.1 million. While we have, and will continue to take steps to stabilize and grow revenues and decrease our operating costs on a year-over-year basis, unless we are able to generate positive cash flow or improve our liquidity in the future, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Our registered independent public accounting firm’s report on our audited financial statements for the year ended September 29, 2017 contains an explanatory paragraph related to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

 

To address the decline in revenue, we continue to execute upon strategies to increase the number of attendees in our public courses and expand our overall customer base. Many of these strategies relate to pricing promotions to attract new customers or to re-engage old customers who have not used our services recently. Another strategy is to grow our position as a leading worldwide provider of training and workforce development to IT professionals and managers through the continued growth of our Workforce Optimization Solutions. Workforce Optimization Solutions augments and enhances our core training capabilities enabling Learning Tree to partner with our customers in helping them develop a high-performing organization through workforce development and process improvement.

 

We accelerated our comprehensive cost reduction program in fiscal year 2017 and exceeded our goal of reducing fiscal year 2017 overall expenses (including cost of revenues) by $10.0 million to $12.0 million when compared to fiscal year 2016 expenses. In total, fiscal year 2017 expenses (including cost of revenues) were $22.1 million lower than fiscal year 2016. This includes a reduction in the restructuring charge of $1.5 million. These targeted cost reductions were in addition to approximately $6.8 million in operating cost reductions achieved during fiscal year 2016 compared to the Company’s expenses for fiscal year 2015. These reductions have helped to right-size our operations, modernize our business operations, and preserve capital.

 

To further address our liquidity needs in the near term, we entered into a Financing Agreement on January 12, 2017 with Action Capital to provide the Company with access to borrow up to $3.0 million. We did not draw on the Financing Agreement during fiscal year 2017. See Note 12 of the Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Form 10-K for more information about this Financing Agreement.   

 

We are also continuing to evaluate all strategic options available to the Company, including those to obtain additional sources of capital and financing in order to improve liquidity. However, there is no assurance that additional capital and/or financing will be available to the Company, and even if available, whether it will be on terms acceptable to us or in amounts required.

 

34

 

 

The stabilization and growth of revenues are integral to our goal of achieving a break even operating income line and a positive cash flow from operations for fiscal year 2018. We cannot provide assurances that our plans will not change, that changed circumstances will not result in the depletion of our capital resources more rapidly than we currently anticipate, or that we will be successful in securing additional liquidity.

 

Capital Requirements. During fiscal year 2017, we made capital expenditures of less than $0.1 million for the purchase of equipment worldwide, mostly computers and other equipment for use in our courses. Additionally, $0.5 million in leasehold improvements were funded directly by third party lenders for the renovation of the London Education Center. We plan to continue to invest in our infrastructure to accommodate customer demand as necessary, to continue improving the quality and effectiveness of our course delivery and to incorporate significant changes in technology. We have a number of operating leases for administrative offices and education center classroom facilities located worldwide. These leases expire at various dates over the next nine years. In addition to requiring monthly/quarterly payments for rent, some of the leases contain asset retirement provisions which require us to return the leased facility back to a specified condition at the expiration of the lease. We record the expense for these asset retirement obligations ratably over the life of the lease. We have no asset retirement payments coming due in fiscal year 2018. In connection with our comprehensive cost reduction program, as leases expire, cost reductions related to the elimination or renegotiation of leases will be evaluated.

 

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

 

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.   

 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND POLICIES 

 

Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The following list of critical accounting estimates and policies is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” The following represents a summary of our critical accounting estimates and policies, defined as those policies that we believe are the most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations, and/or require management’s significant judgments and estimates.

 

Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies

 

Revenue Recognition. We offer our customers a multiple-course sales discount referred to as a Learning Tree Training Passport. A Learning Tree Training Passport allows an individual Passport holder to attend up to a specified number of courses over a one- to two-year period for a fixed price. For Training Passports, revenue is recognized as courses are attended with the amount of revenue recognized based upon the selling price of the Training Passport, the list price of the course taken, the weighted average list price of all courses taken and the estimated average number of courses all Passport holders will actually attend. Upon expiration of each individual Training Passport, we record the difference, if any, between the revenues previously recognized and that specific Training Passport’s total invoiced price. The estimated attendance rate is based upon the historical experience of the average number of course events that Training Passport holders have been attending. The actual Training Passport attendance rate is reviewed at least semi-annually, and if the Training Passport attendance rates change, the revenue recognition rate for active Training Passports and for Training Passports sold thereafter is adjusted prospectively.

                                                                                           

We believe it is appropriate to recognize revenues on this basis in order to most closely match revenue and related costs, as a substantial number of Passport holders do not attend the maximum number of course events permitted by their Training Passports. We believe the use of recent historical data is reasonable and appropriate because of the relative stability of the average actual number of course events attended by Passport holders.

 

The average actual attendance rate for all expired Training Passports has closely approximated the estimated rate we utilize. Although we have seen no material changes in the historical rates as the number of course titles has changed, we monitor such potential effects. In general, determining the estimated average number of course events that will be attended by a Training Passport holder is based on historical trends that may not continue in the future. These estimates could differ in the near term from amounts used in arriving at the reported revenue. If the estimates are wrong, we would record the difference between the revenues previously recognized for that Training Passport and the Training Passport selling price upon expiration of that Training Passport. Thus, the timing of revenue recognition may be affected by an inaccurate estimation, but the inaccuracy would have no effect on the aggregate revenue recognized over the one- to two-year life of each Training Passport.

 

35

 

 

For Passport products for which historical utilization data is not available, we assume the estimated average number of courses to be attended is the number of courses available on the Passport. For the Unlimited Passport program, we utilized historical data to estimate the expected number of courses that will be attended. Assumed utilization rates for products for which historical utilization data is not available may be revised in future periods after sufficient time has passed and historical trends can be analyzed.

 

In addition to our Learning Tree Training Passports, we also offer a multiple-course sales discount referred to as Learning Tree Training Vouchers. With Learning Tree Training Vouchers, a customer buys the right to send a specified number of attendees to Learning Tree courses over a six- to twelve-month period for a fixed price. Revenue is recognized on a pro rata basis each time a voucher is used to attend a course.  When a voucher expires unused, we record the remaining pro rata value of the expired voucher as revenue. At times, we extend the life of a Training Voucher beyond the typical twelve-month expiration date. Training Vouchers purchased under government rate schedules have no expiration date.

 

For reseller partner courses, we record revenue net of the amount we pay the partner for providing the course and do not include the course as an event nor count the customer as a participant in our operating statistics.

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. Trade accounts receivable are reduced by an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future. We use estimates in determining the allowance for doubtful accounts, based on our analysis of various factors, including our historical collection experience, current trends, specific identification of invoices which are considered doubtful and a percentage of our past due accounts receivable. Although our estimates for this reserve have in the past been reasonably accurate, these estimates could differ from actual collection experience and are subject to adjustment. Our trade accounts receivable are written off when they are deemed uncollectible.

 

Lease Termination Costs. We lease education center and administrative office space under various operating lease agreements. Certain of these operating leases include space that is not used and that is currently subleased. We calculate and record a liability related to those leases based on the difference between the present value of the net aggregate sublease rental income and the present value of the prime lease costs for the subleased space throughout the remaining term of the leases. Periodically, we evaluate the nature and extent of each of the individual provisions and make adjustments as appropriate, as new information becomes available or subsequent developments occur. When space is vacant from time to time, and when the requirements of “cease-use date” is met, we must estimate the fair value of the liability for the vacant space based upon the remaining lease costs as defined by our operating lease agreement reduced by estimated future sublease rental income that could be reasonably obtained for the property based upon prevailing real estate market conditions. The computed short and long-term portions of such liabilities are recorded as deferred facilities rent and other in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Amounts are paid under the master lease to the landlord, netted against subtenant sublease receipts, and applied to our accrued lease liability, reducing the amount of liability recorded with an offset to General and Administrative expenses.

 

Asset Retirement Obligations. We record a liability equal to the fair value of the estimated future cost to retire an asset. For us, asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) liabilities are primarily associated with education facility leasehold improvements which, at the end of a lease, we are obligated to remove in order to restore the facility back to a condition specified in the lease agreement. At the inception of such a lease, we record the ARO as a liability and also record a leasehold improvement asset in an amount equal to the fair value of the liability. The capitalized leasehold improvement asset is then depreciated on a straight-line basis over 20 years or the term of the lease, whichever is shorter. Any difference between the actual costs incurred for the eventual retirement and the estimated liability previously recorded will be recognized as a gain or loss in our statement of operations at the termination of the lease.

 

The fair value of any such ARO liability is estimated in three steps: (1) the costs of leasehold restoration are estimated as if they were to be performed at the inception of the lease, (2) the cost is forecast into the future by applying an inflation rate in effect at the time of adoption together with a market-risk premium for a contractor’s risk for performing the work in the future, and (3) the present value of this future cost is computed by discounting it at our credit worthiness interest rate (determined at the inception of the lease).

 

The ARO liability is subsequently increased annually by interest accretion throughout the term of the lease. In future periods we may also make adjustments to the ARO liability as a result of the availability of new information, technology changes, changes in labor costs and other factors.

  

36

 

 

The ARO liability is based on a number of assumptions requiring professional judgment. These include estimates for: (1) expected future cash flows related to contractual obligations, primarily to restore leased space back to open floor layouts as required by the lease agreements; (2) our credit-adjusted risk free rate that considers our estimated credit rating as of the date of lease inception; (3) the market risk premium that we determine based on the length of the individual leases; and (4) the relevant inflation factor in each affected country. For the more significant AROs we obtain third-party restoration estimates specific to those leases. We cannot predict the type of revisions to these assumptions that will be required in future periods due to the availability of additional information, technology changes, the price of labor costs and other factors.

 

Income Taxes. We account for income taxes in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 740, Income Taxes. ASC 740 prescribes the use of the asset and liability method to compute the differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and the related financial amounts, using currently enacted tax laws. If necessary, a valuation allowance is established, based on the weight of available evidence, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Realization of the deferred tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities, is principally dependent upon achievement of sufficient future taxable income. We exercise significant judgment in determining our provisions for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and our future taxable income for purposes of assessing our ability to utilize any future tax benefit from our deferred tax assets.

 

Although we believe that our tax estimates are reasonable, the ultimate determination involves significant judgments that could become subject to examination by tax authorities in the ordinary course of business. We periodically assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the impact on our deferred taxes and income tax liabilities and the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. Changes in income tax legislation, statutory income tax rates or future taxable income levels, among other things, could materially impact our valuation of income tax assets and liabilities and could cause our income tax provision to vary significantly among financial reporting periods.

 

Long-Lived Assets. We periodically review the carrying value of our long-lived assets, such as equipment, property and leasehold improvements, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. In making such evaluations, we compare the expected future cash flows to the carrying amount of the assets. If the total of the expected future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the assets, we are required to make estimates of the fair value of the long-lived assets in order to calculate an impairment loss which is equal to the difference between the fair value and the carrying value of the assets. We make significant assumptions and estimates in this process regarding matters that are inherently uncertain, such as estimating cash flows, remaining useful lives, discount rates and growth rates. The resulting cash flows are computed over an extended period of time, which subjects those assumptions and estimates to an even larger degree of uncertainty. While we believe that our estimates are reasonable, different assumptions regarding such cash flows could materially affect the valuation of long-lived assets.

 

 OUTLOOK

 

This presentation sets forth select expected future results of the Company based on estimates, assumptions and information available to the Company as of the filing of this Form 10-K. Since the financial and other information presented below are estimates of future results and performance, the actual results and outcomes may be different and such differences may be material.

 

37

 

 

Effect of Exchange Rates. In fiscal year 2017, approximately 37% of our annual business was conducted in currencies other than U.S. dollars and fluctuations in exchange rates will affect future revenues and expenses when translated into dollars. If the exchange rates as of December 1, 2017 remain constant for the remainder of our first quarter of fiscal year 2018, then we would expect foreign exchange rates to positively impact first quarter revenues by approximately 2.8% when compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2017. Of course, we would also see a negative effect from exchange rates on our overall expenses, though this effect is less pronounced because more of our expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars, including our corporate management and centralized IT, marketing and course development activities which are located here in the United States.

 

Number of Course Weeks. As a result of our 52/53 week accounting policy and the timing of holidays, our first quarter of fiscal year 2018 will have 11 available training weeks as compared to 12 training weeks in our first quarter of fiscal year 2017.

 

First Quarter Revenues. We currently expect revenues from operations for our first quarter of fiscal year 2018 of between $16.5 million and $17.5 million, compared to revenues from operations of $18.6 million in our first quarter of fiscal year 2017.

 

First Quarter Gross Profit. We expect a gross profit percentage in our first quarter of fiscal year 2018 of between 44.2% and 45.2% compared to 42.9% in our first quarter of fiscal year 2017.

 

First Quarter Operating Expenses. We expect overall operating expenses for our first quarter of fiscal year 2018 to be between $7.4 million and $7.8 million, compared to $8.5 million in our first quarter of fiscal year 2017.

 

First Quarter Loss from Operations. As a result of the above factors, we expect to experience first quarter of fiscal year of 2018 operating results of between a loss of $(0.5) million and operating income of $0.5 million compared with a $(0.5) million loss from operations in our first quarter of fiscal year 2017.

 

First Quarter Other Income (Expense), Net. We expect first quarter other income (expense), to be between $0 and $(0.1) million, compared to other income of $0.2 million in our first quarter of fiscal year 2017.

 

First Quarter Pre-Tax Loss. Overall, we expect to report pre-tax results of between a loss for our first quarter of fiscal year 2018 of $(0.6) million and pre-tax income of $0.5 million, compared to a pre-tax loss of $(0.3) million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017.  

   

 

Item 7A.          QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Not Required for a Smaller Reporting Company  

 

38

 

 

Item 8.             FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

 

LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES  

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  

  

Page

  

  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

40

  

  

Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016

41

  

  

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for fiscal years ended September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016

42

  

  

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity for fiscal years ended September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016

43

  

  

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for fiscal years ended September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016

44

  

  

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

45

 

39

 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

Board of Directors and Stockholders 

Learning Tree International, Inc. 

Herndon, VA

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Learning Tree International, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) as of September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016 and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ (deficit) equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Learning Tree International, Inc. and its subsidiaries at September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s existing cash resources, recurring operating losses, negative cash flows from operations, and negative working capital raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.  Management’s plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.  The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

 

 

 

 

McLean, Virginia

December 15, 2017 

 

40

 

 

LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

 

   

September 29,

   

September 30,

 
   

2017

   

2016

 
                 

Assets

               

Current Assets:

               

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 5,080     $ 8,540  

Trade accounts receivable, net

    9,725       9,538  

Income tax receivable

    129       208  

Prepaid expenses

    1,399       1,916  
Lease deposits     1,174       362  

Other current assets

    1,333       1,424  

Total current assets

    18,840       21,988  

Equipment, Property and Leasehold Improvements:

               

Education and office equipment

    29,288       32,388  

Transportation equipment

    44       43  

Property and leasehold improvements

    8,107       18,469  
      37,439       50,900  

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

    (32,909 )     (44,990 )
      4,530       5,910  

Restricted interest-bearing investments

    1,477       2,581  

Deferred income taxes

    505       427  

Other assets

    911       701  

Total assets

  $ 26,263     $ 31,607  
                 

Liabilities

               

Current Liabilities:

               

Trade accounts payable

  $ 6,245     $ 6,095  

Deferred revenues

    18,383       21,017  

Accrued payroll, benefits and related taxes

    2,207       2,414  

Other accrued liabilities

    743       973  

Income taxes payable

    54       0  

Current portion of deferred facilities rent and loan payable

    1,560       1,667  

Total current liabilities

    29,192       32,166  

Loan payable

    365       0  

Asset retirement obligations

    1,143       1,369  

Deferred income taxes

    118       89  

Deferred facilities rent and other

    5,415       6,297  

Noncurrent tax liabilities

    1,852       1,475  

Total liabilities

    38,085       41,396  

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

               

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

               

Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; 0 shares issued and outstanding

    0       0  

Common stock, $.0001 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 13,224,349 issued and outstanding

    1       1  

Additional paid-in capital

    6,487       6,388  

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

    (877 )     (882 )

Accumulated deficit

    (17,433 )     (15,296 )

Total stockholders' deficit

    (11,822 )     (9,789 )

Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit

  $ 26,263     $ 31,607  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

41

 

 

LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(amounts in thousands, except per share data) 

 

   

Fiscal Year Ended

 
   

September 29,

2017

   

September 30,

2016

 
                 

Revenues

  $ 70,663     $ 81,587  

Cost of revenues

    40,298       50,163  

Gross profit

    30,365       31,424  
                 

Operating expenses:

               

Course development

    2,868       5,128  

Sales and marketing

    13,497       17,966  

General and administrative

    14,896       18,902  

Restructuring charge

    386       1,940  
      31,647       43,936  

Loss from operations before other operating items

    (1,282 )     (12,512 )
                 

Other operating items:

               

(Loss) gain on disposal of equipment, property and leasehold improvements

    (53 )     11  
      (53 )     11  

Loss from operations

    (1,335 )     (12,501 )

Other (expense) income, net:

               

Interest (expense) income, net

    (53 )     15  

Foreign exchange (losses) gains

    (254 )     215  

Other

    (21 )     (3 )
      (328 )     227  
                 

Loss from operations before provision for income taxes

    (1,663 )     (12,274 )

Provision for income taxes

    474       422  

Net loss

  $ (2,137 )   $ (12,696 )
                 

Loss per share basic and diluted:

               

Basic and diluted loss per share

  $ (0.16 )   $ (0.96 )
                 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

               

Weighted average shares - basic and diluted

    13,224       13,224  
                 

Comprehensive loss:

               

Net loss

    (2,137 )     (12,696 )

Foreign currency translation adjustments

    5       (304 )
    $ (2,132 )   $ (13,000 )

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

 

42

 

 

LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS(DEFICIT) EQUITY

(amounts in thousands)

 

   

Common Stock

           

Accumulated

                 
   

Shares

Outstanding

   

Amount

   

Additional Paid-

In Capital

   

Other

Comprehensive

Loss

   

Accumulated

Deficit

   

Total

Stockholders'

(Deficit) Equity

 

Balance, October 2, 2015

    13,224     $ 1     $ 6,224     $ (578 )   $ (2,600 )   $ 3,047  
                                                 

Net loss

    0       0       0       0       (12,696 )     (12,696 )

Foreign currency translation

    0       0       0       (304 )     0       (304 )

Share based compensation

    0       0       164       0       0       164  

Balance, September 30, 2016

    13,224     $ 1     $ 6,388     $ (882 )   $ (15,296 )   $ (9,789 )
                                                 

Net loss

    0       0       0       0       (2,137 )     (2,137 )

Foreign currency translation

    0       0       0       5       0       5  

Share based compensation

    0       0       99       0       0       99  

Balance, September 29, 2017

    13,224     $ 1     $ 6,487     $ (877 )   $ (17,433 )   $ (11,822 )

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

43

 

 

 

LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(amounts in thousands)

 

   

Twelve months ended

 
   

September 29

   

September 30

 
   

2017

   

2016

 

Cash flows - operating activities

               

Net Loss

  $ (2,137 )   $ (12,696 )

Adjustments to reconcile net loss from operations to net cash used in operating activities:

               

Depreciation and amortization

    1,945       2,830  

Share-based compensation

    99       164  

Deferred income taxes

    (53 )     (29 )

Provision for doubtful accounts

    255       391  

Accretion on asset retirement obligations

    66       76  

Loss (gain) on disposal of equipment, property and leasehold improvements

    53       (11 )

Restructuring charge

    386       1,940  

Unrealized foreign exchange losses (gains)

    72       (205 )

Settlement of asset retirement obligation

    (310 )     (77 )

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

               

Trade accounts receivable

    (363 )     404  

Prepaid expenses and other assets

    780       914  

Income tax receivable / payable

    513       405  

Trade accounts payable

    92       (483 )

Deferred revenues

    (2,833 )     (1,274 )

Deferred facilities rent and other

    (1,470 )     (438 )

Asset retirement obligation

    0       (128 )

Other accrued liabilities

    (317 )     (774 )

Net cash used in operating activities

    (3,222 )     (8,991 )

Cash flows - investing activities:

               

Purchases of equipment, property and leasehold improvements

    (42 )     (385 )

Proceeds from sale of equipment, property and leasehold improvements

    15       12  

Net cash used in investing activities

    (27 )     (373 )

Cash flows - financing activities:

               

Payments on long term debt

    (9 )     0  

Payments on capital lease obligations

    (79 )     0  

Net cash used in financing activities

    (88 )     0  

Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

    (123 )     (32 )

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

    (3,460 )     (9,396 )

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period

    8,540       17,936  

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period

  $ 5,080     $ 8,540  
                 

Supplemental disclosures:

               

Income tax paid

  $ 129     $ 191  

Interest paid

  $ 86     $ 16  
                 

Supplemental non-cash disclosures:

               

Non-cash leasehold improvements

  $ 532     $ 2,106  

Non-cash loan payable

  $ 532     $ 0  

Equipment acquired under capital lease

  $ 0     $ 472  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.  

 

44

 

 

LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES  

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

 

1. NATURE OF THE BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

a. Nature of the Business

 

Learning Tree International, Inc. and subsidiaries (“the Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) develop, market, and deliver a broad, predominately proprietary, library of instructor-led classroom courses that are designed to meet the professional development needs of information technology (“IT”) professionals and managers worldwide. These courses are delivered primarily at our leased education centers located in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Sweden and Japan. Such course events are also conducted from specially equipped facilities, in hotel and conference facilities, and at customer sites throughout the world. Almost all of our course titles are also available to individuals located worldwide through Learning Tree AnyWare™, our patent-pending live online learning interface that allows individuals at any location to attend a live instructor-led Learning Tree class via the Internet. Our courses provide both breadth and depth of education across a wide range of technical and management disciplines, including operating systems, databases, computer networks, computer and network security, web development, programming languages, software engineering, open source applications, project management, business skills, and leadership and professional development.

 

We follow a 52- or 53-week fiscal year, with our quarter-end dates on the Friday nearest the end of the calendar quarter and our year-end dates on the Friday nearest the end of September. Accordingly, our fiscal year 2017 ended on September 29, 2017, and our fiscal year 2016 ended on September 30, 2016. Thus, these consolidated financial statements report our consolidated financial position as of September 29, 2017, and September 30, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ (deficit) equity and cash flows for the fiscal years ended September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016. Both fiscal years 2017 and 2016 were 52-week years.

 

Certain items in the fiscal year 2016 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with current presentations, as related to the balance sheet reclassification of certain assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

 

b. Basis of Presentation

 

As of and for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2017, we have reported an accumulated stockholders' deficit of $11.8 million and we have also reported negative cash flow from continuing operations in fiscal year 2017 and for the previous five years as revenues have declined each year during this period. At September 29, 2017, our capital resources consisted of cash and cash equivalents of $5.1 million. While we continue taking steps to stabilize and grow revenues and decrease costs on a year over year basis in 2018, unless we are able to improve our liquidity in the future, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

 

To address the decline in revenue, we continue to execute upon strategies to increase the number of attendees in our public courses and expand our overall customer base. Many of these strategies relate to pricing promotions to attract new customers or to re-engage old customers that have not used our services recently. Another strategy is to grow our position as a leading worldwide provider of training and workforce development to IT professionals and managers through the continued growth of our Workforce Optimization Solutions. Workforce Optimization Solutions augments and enhances our core training capabilities enabling Learning Tree to partner with our customers in helping them develop a high-performing organization through workforce development and process improvement.

 

We accelerated our comprehensive cost reduction program in fiscal year 2017 and exceeded our goal of reducing our fiscal year 2017 overall expenses by $10.0 million to $12.0 million when compared to expenses for fiscal year 2016. In total, fiscal year 2017 overall expenses (including costs of revenues) were $22.1 million lower than fiscal year 2016. This includes a reduction in the restructuring charge of $1.5 million. These targeted cost reductions were in addition to approximately $6.8 million in operating cost reductions achieved during fiscal year 2016 when compared to the Company’s expenses for fiscal year 2015. These reductions have allowed us to right-size the Company’s operations, modernize our business operations, and preserve capital.

 

To further address our liquidity needs in the near term, on January 12, 2017, we entered into a Financing Agreement with Action Capital, which provides the Company with access to borrow through advances of funds up to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $3.0 million. We did not draw on the Financing Agreement during fiscal year 2017. See Notes 12 and 14 of these consolidated financial statements for more information about this Financing Agreement.   

 

45

 

 

We are also continuing to evaluate additional sources of capital and financing. However, there is no assurance that additional capital and/or financing will be available to the Company, and even if available, whether it will be on terms acceptable to us or in amounts required.

 

The stabilization of revenues and continued reduction in costs are integral to our goal of achieving a break even operating income line and a positive cash flow from operations for fiscal year 2018. We cannot provide assurances that our plans will not change, that changes in circumstances will not result in the depletion of our capital resources more rapidly than we currently anticipate, or that we will be successful in securing additional liquidity. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, but due to the Company’s future liquidity needs, history of net losses, and negative cash flows from continuing operations, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

c. Principles of Consolidation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Learning Tree International, Inc. and our subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The following is a list of our subsidiaries as of September 29, 2017:  

 

Learning Tree International USA, Inc. (U.S.)  

Learning Tree International, K.K. (Japan)  

Learning Tree International Ltd. (United Kingdom)  

Learning Tree International AB (Sweden)  

Learning Tree International Inc. (Canada)  

Advanced Technology Marketing, Inc. (U.S.)

AnyWare Live, Inc. (U.S.)

 

d. Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable

 

Our revenues are primarily received from business entities and government agencies for the professional training of their employees. Course events range in length from one to five days, and average approximately three and a half days. As stated above, we follow a 52- or 53-week fiscal year. This method is used in order to better align our external financial reporting with the way we operate our business. Since all courses have a duration of five days or less, and all courses begin and end within the same calendar week, under the 52- or 53-week fiscal year method all revenues and related direct costs for each course event are recognized in the week and the fiscal quarter in which the event takes place.  

 

We offer our customers a multiple-course sales discount referred to as a Learning Tree Training Passport. A Learning Tree Training Passport allows an individual Passport holder to attend up to a specified number of courses over a one- to two-year period for a fixed price. For Training Passports, revenue is recognized as courses are attended with the amount of revenue recognized based upon the selling price of the Training Passport, the list price of the course taken, the weighted average list price of all courses taken and the estimated average number of courses all Passport holders will actually attend. Upon expiration of each individual Training Passport, we record the difference, if any, between the revenues previously recognized and that specific Training Passport’s total invoiced price. The estimated attendance rate is based upon the historical experience of the average number of course events that Training Passport holders have attended. The actual Training Passport attendance rate is reviewed at least semi-annually, and if the Training Passport attendance rates change, the revenue recognition rate for active Training Passports and for Training Passports sold thereafter is adjusted prospectively.

                                                                                           

We believe it is appropriate to recognize revenues on this basis in order to most closely match revenue and related costs, as a substantial number of Passport holders do not attend the maximum number of course events permitted by their Training Passports. We believe the use of recent historical data is reasonable and appropriate because of the relative stability of the average actual number of course events attended by Passport holders.

 

The average actual attendance rate for all expired Training Passports has closely approximated the estimated rate we utilize. Although we have seen no material changes in the historical rates as the number of course titles has changed, we monitor such potential effects. In general, determining the estimated average number of course events that will be attended by a Training Passport holder is based on historical trends that may not continue in the future. These estimates could differ in the near term from amounts used in arriving at the reported revenue. If the estimates are wrong, we would record the difference between the revenues previously recognized for that Training Passport and the Training Passport selling price upon expiration of that Training Passport. Thus, the timing of revenue recognition may be affected by an inaccurate estimation, but the inaccuracy would have no effect on the aggregate revenue recognized over the one- to two-year life of each Training Passport.

 

46

 

 

For Passport products for which historical utilization data is not available, we assume the estimated average number of courses to be attended is the number of courses available on the Passport. For the Unlimited Passport program, we utilized historical data to estimate the expected number of courses that will be attended. Assumed utilization rates for products for which historical utilization data is not available may be revised in future periods after sufficient time has passed and historical trends can be analyzed.

 

In addition to our Learning Tree Training Passports, we also offer a multiple-course sales discount referred to as Learning Tree Training Vouchers. With Learning Tree Training Vouchers, a customer buys the right to send a specified number of attendees to Learning Tree courses over a six- to twelve-month period for a fixed price. Revenue is recognized on a pro rata basis each time a voucher is used to attend a course.  When a voucher expires unused, we record the remaining pro rata value of the expired voucher as revenue. At times, we extend the life of a Training Voucher beyond the typical twelve-month expiration date. Training Vouchers purchased under government rate schedules have no expiration date.

 

For reseller partner courses, we record revenue net of the amount we pay the partner for providing the course and do not include the course as an event nor count the customer as a participant in our operating statistics.

 

Trade accounts receivable are reduced by an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future. We use estimates in determining the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based on our analysis of various factors, including our historical collection experience, current trends, specific identification of invoices which are considered doubtful, and a percentage of our past due accounts receivable. These estimates could differ from actual collection experience and are subject to adjustment. Our trade accounts receivable are written off when they are deemed uncollectible.

 

e. Share-Based Compensation

 

We estimate the fair value of share-based option awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. We estimate the fair value of share-based restricted stock units and restricted stock grants using the closing price of our stock on the date of grant. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Our determination of fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model is affected by assumptions regarding a number of variables, including our expected stock price volatility, expected term, dividend yield and risk-free interest rates.

 

We analyzed our historical volatility to estimate the expected volatility. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based on the U.S. Treasury rate at the date of grant that most closely resembles the expected life of our options. The estimated expected life represents the weighted-average period the stock options are expected to remain outstanding and has been determined based on the simplified method under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation. We do not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.

 

As share-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated pre-vesting forfeitures. Forfeitures were estimated based on historical experience.

 

f. Course Development Costs

 

Course development costs are charged to operations in the period incurred.

 

g. Advertising

 

Advertising costs are charged to expense in the period incurred. Advertising costs totaled $234 and $383 in fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively.

 

h. Cash and Cash Equivalents and Interest-bearing Investments

 

We consider highly liquid investments with remaining maturities of ninety days or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. 

 

47

 

 

Restricted interest-bearing investments at September 29, 2017 consisted of cash deposits of $753 (563 British Pounds), $188 (1,535 Swedish Krona) and $536 which were pledged as collateral to secure our obligations under leases for education center facilities located in the United Kingdom, Sweden, and the United States, respectively. This compares to restricted interest-bearing investments of cash deposits of $1,867 (1,439 British Pounds), $179 (1,534 Swedish Krona) and $897 at September 30, 2016. The United Kingdom deposits are held in trust by the landlord with interest accruing to us and paid on an annual basis. The deposits will be released to us at the earlier of the end of the lease period or when certain financial ratios have been met. In the United States, the deposit is in an interest-bearing restricted account held by our bank and serves as collateral for letters of credit issued to our landlords by our bank. Of the restricted interest-bearing investments as of September 30, 2016, $362 and $2,581 are presented as current and non-current assets in the consolidated balance sheet, respectively.

 

i. Marketing Expenses

 

Marketing expenses for fiscal year 2017 primarily include the costs of digital marketing campaigns and electronic mail to our proprietary database of IT professionals and internal marketing staff costs.  Marketing expenses for fiscal year 2016 primarily include the external costs associated with the design, printing, postage, list rental and handling of direct mail advertising materials to be mailed in the future as well as internal marketing staff costs. These costs are charged to expense in the month in which the advertising campaign occurs since the benefit period for such costs is short and the amount of future benefit is not practically measurable. Marketing expenses for fiscal years 2017 and 2016 were $1,999 and $5,857 respectively.

 

j. Equipment, Property and Leasehold Improvements

 

Equipment, property and leasehold improvements are recorded at cost and depreciated or amortized using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:

 

Education and office equipment (years)

  3 to 5

Transportation equipment (years)

    4  

Accounting software (years)

    7  

Leasehold improvements

 

20 years or the life of

the lease, if shorter

 

 

Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $1,945 and $2,830 in fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively. Costs of normal maintenance and repairs and minor replacements are normally charged to expense as incurred. In those instances where we have determined we are contractually obligated to incur recurring repairs and maintenance costs related to our leased facilities, a provision is made in the consolidated financial statements at the earlier of the date the expense is incurred or the date of the obligation. The costs of assets sold or retired are eliminated from the accounts along with the related accumulated depreciation or amortization, and any resulting gain or loss is included in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.  

 

During fiscal year 2017, we financed $0.5 million of leasehold improvements through financing agreements with third party lenders.  During fiscal year 2016, we financed $1.8 million of leasehold improvements and $0.3 million of office equipment purchases through tenant improvement reimbursements with the landlord of our Herndon facility.

 

The fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) associated with a leased facility is recorded as an asset (leasehold improvements) and a liability when there is a legal obligation associated with the retirement of a long-lived asset and the amount can be reasonably estimated. See also Note 2 relating to AROs.

 

k. Long-Lived Assets

 

We periodically review the carrying value of our long-lived assets, such as equipment, property and leasehold improvements for impairment or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. In making such evaluations, we compare the expected future cash flows to the carrying amount of the assets. If the total of the expected future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the assets, we are required to make estimates of the fair value of the long-lived assets in order to calculate the impairment loss equal to the difference between the fair value of the assets and their book value. We make significant assumptions and estimates in this process regarding matters that are inherently uncertain, such as estimating cash flows, remaining useful lives, discount rates and growth rates. The resulting cash flows are computed over an extended period of time, which subjects those assumptions and estimates to an even larger degree of uncertainty. While we believe that our estimates are reasonable, different assumptions regarding such cash flows could materially affect the valuation of long-lived assets.

 

l. Deferred Revenues

 

Deferred revenues primarily relate to unearned revenues associated with Training Passports, Training Vouchers and advance payments received from customers for course events to be held in the future.

  

48

 

 

m. Comprehensive loss

 

We report comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Other comprehensive loss represents changes in stockholders’ equity from non-owner sources and is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments. At the end of fiscal year 2017, accumulated other comprehensive loss consisted of cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments of $(877) compared to cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments of $(882) at the end of fiscal year 2016.

 

n. Income Taxes

 

We provide for income taxes under the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC 740, Income Taxes. Deferred income taxes result from temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the basis reported in our consolidated financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted rates expected to be in effect during the year in which the differences reverse. Valuation allowances are provided against assets, including net operating losses, if it is anticipated that some or the entire asset may not be realized through future taxable earnings or implementation of tax planning strategies.

 

The tax effects of uncertain tax positions are recognized in the consolidated financial statements only if the position is more likely than not to be sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. For tax positions meeting the more likely than not threshold, the amount recognized in the consolidated financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized. It is our accounting policy to account for ASC 740-10-related penalties and interest as a component of the income tax provision in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. 

 

o. Foreign Currency

 

We translate the financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries from the local (functional) currencies to U.S. dollars. The rates of exchange at each fiscal year end are used for translating the assets and liabilities and the average monthly rates of exchange for each year are used for the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Gains or losses arising from the translation of the foreign subsidiaries’ financial statements are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. 

 

To date, we have not sought to hedge the risk associated with fluctuations in currency exchange rates, and therefore we continue to be subject to such risk.

 

p. Deferred Facilities Rent

 

Operating Lease Activities:

 

We lease education center and administrative office space under various operating lease agreements. Certain lease agreements include provisions that provide for cash incentives, graduated rent payments and other inducements. We recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis over the related terms of such leases. The value of lease incentives and/or inducements, along with the excess of the rent expense recognized over the rentals paid, is recorded as deferred facilities rent in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

 

Lease Termination Activities:

 

 We record liabilities for costs that will be incurred under a contract without economic benefit at estimated fair value. We have vacated space in leased facilities subject to operating leases and recorded the estimated liability associated with future rentals at the cease-use date. The fair value of the liability at the cease-use date was determined based on the remaining cash flows for lease rentals, and minimum lease payments, reduced by estimated sublease rentals and certain subtenant reimbursements that could be reasonably obtained for the property, discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. The liability is adjusted for changes, if any, resulting from revisions to estimated cash flows after the cease-use date, measured using the original historical credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Changes due to the passage of time are recognized as an increase in the carrying amount of the liability and as accretion expense.  

 

q. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted interest-bearing investments, accounts receivable, and accounts payable, and current portion of loan payable approximate their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.  The carrying value of the non-current portion of loan payable also approximates fair value since this loan substantially consist of the new financing agreement that was obtained during the current fiscal year as discussed in Note 12 of these consolidated financial statements.

 

49

 

 

 r. Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

s. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which supercedes most existing revenue recognition models that require revenue guidance under GAAP. The standard is a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires revenue to be recognized in a manner to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five step process to achieve its core principle and, in doing so, more judgement and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than required under existing GAAP. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU 2015-14”), which defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year to fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Accordingly, the standard is effective for us on September 30, 2018 using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach. We have yet to determine which transition approach to use and have just started to evaluate the impact that the updated standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” (“ASU 2014-15”). The standard requires management to evaluate, at each interim and annual reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued, and provide related disclosures. ASU 2014-15 is effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. As such, we have adopted ASU 2014-15 effective with the start of our fiscal year beginning September 30, 2017. We have and will continue to evaluate, at each interim and annual reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued, and provide related disclosures.

 

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (“ASU 2015-17”). The standard requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet rather than being separated into current and noncurrent. ASU 2015-17 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted and the standard may be applied retrospectively or on a prospective basis to all deferred tax assets and liabilities. Accordingly, we have adopted ASU 2015-17 with the start of our fiscal year beginning September 30, 2017 and will result in our deferred tax assets and liabilities being classified as non-current on our consolidated balance sheet.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to recognize an ROU asset and liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months.  Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement.  The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available.  Accordingly, the standard is effective for us on September 28, 2019.  Early adoption is permitted.  While we are still evaluating the impact of our pending adoption of the new standard on our consolidated financial statements, we expect that upon adoption we will recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities and that the amounts could be material.

 

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”). The standard is intended to simplify several areas of accounting for share-based compensation arrangements, including the income tax impact, classification on the statement of cash flows and forfeitures. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. Accordingly, we have adopted ASU 2016-09 effective with the start of our fiscal year beginning September 30, 2017. The adoption of ASU No. 2016-09 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (“ASU 2016-15”). The standard clarifies how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. Accordingly, the new standard is effective for us on September 30, 2018 using a retrospective approach. We believe that this standard will not have any significant impact on our consolidated financial statements. 

 

50

 

 

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash - a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force” (“ASU 2016-18”). The standard requires restricted cash and cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents on the statement cash flows. The new standard is expected to be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. Accordingly, the new standard would be effective for us on September 30, 2018 using a retrospective approach, and will result in our restricted cash to be included with cash and cash equivalents to reflect total cash on our statement of cash flows. We are evaluating whether we will early adopt the new standard. 

 

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including the Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the SEC did not, or management believes will not, have a material impact on our present or future consolidated financial statements. 

 

2. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

 

We record a liability equal to the fair value of the estimated cost to retire an asset. The ARO liability is recorded in the period in which the obligation meets the definition of a liability, which is generally when the asset is placed in service and whereby we have contractual commitments to remove leasehold improvements and to return the leased facility back to a specified condition when the lease terminates. For a facility lease, this is typically at the inception of the lease.

 

When the ARO liability is initially recorded, we increase the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset (leasehold improvements) by an amount equal to the calculated liability. The liability is subsequently accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset, which is the lease term. The ARO liability is recorded at fair value, and accretion expense (included in general and administrative expenses) is recognized over time as the discounted liability is accreted to its expected settlement value. The fair value of the ARO liability is measured using the expected future cash outflows related to the lease and calculated by using inflation rates in effect at the time of adoption and incorporating a market-risk premium, and discounted at our credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate at the time of adoption. Any difference between costs incurred upon settlement of an asset retirement obligation and the recorded liability will be recognized as a gain or loss in our earnings.  

 

Each ARO liability is based on a number of assumptions requiring judgment. We cannot predict the type of revisions to these assumptions that will be required in future periods due to the availability of additional information, technology changes, the price of labor costs and other factors.

 

The following table presents the activity for our ARO liabilities, which primarily consists of the estimated cost to remove leasehold improvements at our Education Centers:  

 

   

Year ended

   

Year ended

 
   

September 29, 2017

   

September 30, 2016

 
                 

ARO balance, beginning of period

  $ 1,369     $ 1,669  

Accretion expense

    66       76  

Liabilities satisfied

    0       (128 )

Settlement of ARO liability

    (310 )     (77 )

Foreign currency translation

    18       (171 )

ARO balance, end of period

  $ 1,143     $ 1,369  

 

 

3. INCOME TAXES  

 

We file a consolidated United States federal income tax return which includes all of our domestic operations. Our domestic subsidiaries also file income tax returns based on our operations in certain state and local jurisdictions. We file separate tax returns for each of our foreign subsidiaries in the countries in which they operate.

  

Loss before provision for income taxes consists of the following:

 

   

Fiscal Year Ended

 
   

September 29,

2017

   

September 30,

2016

 

Domestic

  $ (1,335 )   $ (11,565 )

Foreign

    (328 )     (709 )

Total

  $ (1,663 )   $ (12,274 )

 

51

 

 

The provision for income taxes consists of the following:

 

   

Fiscal Year Ended

 
   

September 29,

2017

   

September 30,

2016

 

Current tax provision (benefit):

               

U.S. Federal

  $ 0     $ 0  

State

    113       196  

Foreign

    414       255  
      527       451  

Deferred tax provision:

               

U.S. Federal

    50       14  

Foreign

    (103 )     (43 )
      (53 )     (29 )

Provision for income taxes

  $ 474     $ 422  

 

52

 

 

The following is a reconciliation of the provision for income taxes to the United States federal statutory tax rate:

 

   

Fiscal Year Ended

 
   

September 29,

2017

   

Effective

Tax rate

%

   

September 30,

2016

   

Effective

Tax rate

%

 
                                 

Income taxes at the U.S. statutory rate

  $ (582 )     35.0

%

  $ (4,296 )     35.0

%

Equity compensation

    16       (0.9 )     42       (0.3 )

Other permanent differences

    497       (29.9 )     342       (2.8 )

Effects of foreign taxes and tax credits

    47       (2.9 )     2,368       (19.3 )

State income taxes

    73       (4.4 )     (439 )     3.6  

Uncertain tax positions

    343       (20.6 )     320       (2.6 )

Change in valuation allowance

    349       (21.0 )     1,911       (15.6 )

Other

    (269 )     16.2       174       (1.4 )

Total provision for income taxes

  $ 474       (28.5

%)

  $ 422       (3.4

%)

 

Other permanent differences mainly relate to section 956 inclusion, meals and entertainment, and foreign permanent items.

 

Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes and in determining whether any deferred tax assets will be realized in full or in part. When it is more likely than not that all or some portion of specific deferred tax assets such as net operating losses or foreign tax credit carry-forwards will not be realized, a valuation allowance must be established for the amount of the deferred tax assets that would not be realized. Realization will be based on our ability to generate sufficient future taxable income. In fiscal year 2012, we established a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets in the United States due to current year and projected future pre-tax book losses. We continued to maintain this valuation allowance throughout fiscal years 2017 and 2016. As of September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016, we have net operating loss carryforwards to utilize in the U.S. of $20,294 and $18,402, respectively.  Additionally, we have $132 foreign tax credit carryforwards for tax return purposes as of September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016.  The U.S. net operating loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards are scheduled to begin to expire in 2035 and 2021 respectively.  

 

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities consist of the following:

 

 

   

Fiscal Year Ended

 
   

September 29,

2017

   

September 30,

2016

 

Domestic operations:

               

Deferred tax assets:

               

Deferred facilities rent charges

  $ 2,544     $ 2,721  

Deferred revenue

    579       1,772  

Foreign tax credit carryforwards

    132       132  

Alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards

    189       189  

Accrued vacation

    344       360  

Equity compensation

    83       58  

Depreciation and amortization

    1,986       2,418  

Net operating loss

    8,446       6,873  

Capital loss

    83       78  

Allowance for bad debt

    307       206  

Related party payables and Subpart F

    541       193  

Other

    140       36  

Deferred tax liabilities:

               

Prepaid expenses

    (111 )     (158 )

Undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries

    (2,378 )     (2,287 )

Domestic net deferred tax assets

    12,885       12,591  

Foreign operations:

               

Deferred tax assets:

               

Depreciation and other

    505       422  

Deferred tax liabilities:

               

Depreciation and other

    (52 )     (73 )

Foreign net deferred tax assets

    453       349  

Domestic and foreign deferred tax assets

    13,338       12,940  

Valuation allowances

    (12,951 )     (12,602 )

Net deferred tax assets

  $ 387     $ 338  

 

53

 

 

We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. For fiscal year 2017, we recognized an expense of $79 attributable to interest for uncertain tax positions related to transfer pricing and interest accrued. As of September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016, we had $843 and $762 accrued, respectively, for interest and penalties for uncertain tax positions. As of September 29, 2017, $1,398 of our total unrecognized tax benefits would favorably affect our effective tax rate if recognized. We do not believe it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change within the next 12 months due to changes in circumstances other than related to these intercompany transactions. We file income tax returns in the United States and various state, local, and foreign jurisdictions, and remain subject to examinations by these jurisdictions for fiscal years 2011 through 2017. 

 

The aggregate change in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits, which excludes interest and penalties, is as follows:

 

   

Fiscal Year Ended

 
   

September 29,

2017

   

September 30,

2016

 

Balance, beginning of year

  $ 713     $ 472  

Increases related to tax positions taken during the current period

    296       241  

Balance end of year

  $ 1,009     $ 713  

 

Based on future forecasts and budgets, the Company expects to repatriate the unremitted earnings from the foreign subsidiaries to the United States which then become taxable to the Company in the foreseeable future. As of September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016, the Company recorded a deferred tax liability for U.S. federal income of $2,312 and $2,271 and foreign withholding taxes of $66 and $16, respectively. This is related to approximately $6,606 and $6,490 of its international subsidiaries’ undistributed earnings as of September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016, respectively. This deferred tax liability is offset by existing deferred tax assets in the United States; therefore, the net impact to tax expense for fiscal year 2017 is only the $50 of foreign withholding taxes.  

 

4. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES 

 

a. Operating Lease Commitments

 

As of September 29, 2017, we had various non-cancelable operating leases for facilities that expire at various dates through 2026 and certain leases for office equipment requiring annual payments as follows:

 

 

Fiscal Year Ending

 

Minimum

Lease
Payments

   

Less
Sublease
Proceeds

   

Net Lease
Commitments

 

2018

  $ 5,203     $ 531     $ 4,672  

2019

    5,538       561       4,977  

2020

    4,976       583       4,393  

2021

    3,559       348       3,211  

2022

    2,283       0       2,283  

Thereafter

    6,090       0       6,090  
    $ 27,649     $ 2,023     $ 25,626  

 

Rental expense, excluding sublease income, was $6,475 and $9,231 for fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively. Sublease rental income for fiscal years 2017 and 2016 was $85 and $83, respectively.

 

On August 15, 2017, Learning Tree International Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of the United Kingdom (“Learning Tree Limited”) and subsidiary of the Company, entered into an agreement with Laxton Properties Limited (the “Landlord”) to assign two of its lease agreements, with the Company acting as the guarantor for Learning Tree Limited.  The two lease agreements were initially effective as of November 14, 2012 and will expire on November 13, 2022. The two leases cover the first and second floors at Learning Tree Limited’s current location in London (“Euston House”) and will be assigned in their entirety to i2 Office Limited. The leases provide for an average annual minimum rent of £365 ($489) for the first floor and £366 ($490) for the second floor. Learning Tree Limited retained its leases for the ground and basement floors at Euston House. On September 28, 2017, the assignment by Learning Tree Limited of its lease agreements to i2 Office Limited became effective. As a result of the assignment of the first and second floors at the Euston House location occurring, Learning Tree Limited will receive a refund of approximately £876 ($1,174) for its deposits from the landlord. In order to continue to offer training courses at this location, Learning Tree International Limited expects to spend approximately £525 ($703) to renovate the ground and basement floors to include sufficient classrooms and support facilities. The Company was able to externally finance the renovation costs. See Notes 12 and 14 of these consolidated audited financial statements.

 

54

 

 

b. Capital Lease Commitments

 

During fiscal year 2017, we acquired two printers and their licensed software under capita