Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-32 - EXHIBIT 32 - Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati	ex322017q210-q.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati	ex3122017q210-q.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati	ex3112017q210-q.htm

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q



x		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017



o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________.

Commission File No. 000-51399

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CINCINNATI

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Federally chartered corporation		31-6000228
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
600 Atrium Two, P.O. Box 598,
Cincinnati, Ohio		45201-0598
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(513) 852-7500

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company o	Emerging growth company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

o Yes x No

As of July 31, 2017, the registrant had 43,049,589 shares of capital stock outstanding, which included stock classified as mandatorily redeemable. The capital stock of the registrant is not listed on any securities exchange or quoted on any automated quotation system, only may be owned by members and former members and is transferable only at its par value of $100 per share.



Page 1 of	77

Table of Contents



	PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited):

	Statements of Condition - June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016	3

	Statements of Income - Three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016	4

	Statements of Comprehensive Income - Three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016	5

	Statements of Capital - Six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016	6

	Statements of Cash Flows - Six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016	7

	Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements	9

Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	45

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	73

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	73

	PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	74

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	74

Item 5.	Other Information	74

Item 6.	Exhibits	75

Signatures		76

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CINCINNATI

STATEMENTS OF CONDITION

(In thousands, except par value)

(Unaudited)



	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	370,216		$	8,737
Interest-bearing deposits	190			129
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	5,865,699			5,229,487
Federal funds sold	7,030,000			4,257,000
Investment securities:
Trading securities	882			970
Available-for-sale securities	350,004			1,300,023
Held-to-maturity securities (includes $0 and $0 pledged as collateral at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, that may be repledged) ^(a)	14,687,378			14,546,979
Total investment securities	15,038,264			15,847,972
Advances (includes $15,063 and $15,093 at fair value under fair value option at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively)	71,088,071			69,882,074
Mortgage loans held for portfolio:
Mortgage loans held for portfolio	9,448,190			9,149,860
Less: allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans	970			1,142
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net	9,447,220			9,148,718
Accrued interest receivable	118,472			109,886
Premises, software, and equipment, net	8,672			9,187
Derivative assets	78,149			104,753
Other assets	7,852			37,338
TOTAL ASSETS	$	109,052,805		$	104,635,281
LIABILITIES
Deposits	$	713,124		$	765,879
Consolidated Obligations:
Discount Notes	49,359,582			44,689,662
Bonds (includes $5,605,291 and $7,895,510 at fair value under fair value option at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively)	53,359,309			53,190,866
Total Consolidated Obligations	102,718,891			97,880,528
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock	35,969			34,782
Accrued interest payable	127,328			119,322
Affordable Housing Program payable	107,321			104,883
Derivative liabilities	5,942			17,874
Other liabilities	246,347			733,918
Total liabilities	103,954,922			99,657,186
Commitments and contingencies (Note 19)
CAPITAL
Capital stock Class B putable ($100 par value); issued and outstanding shares: 42,197 shares at June 30, 2017 and 41,569 shares at December 31, 2016	4,219,735			4,156,944
Retained earnings:
Unrestricted	599,926			574,122
Restricted	290,644			260,285
Total retained earnings	890,570			834,407
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(12,422		)	(13,256		)
Total capital	5,097,883			4,978,095
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL	$	109,052,805		$	104,635,281


(a)	Fair values: $14,634,113 and $14,413,231 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of Contents

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CINCINNATI

STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
INTEREST INCOME:
Advances	$	215,191		$	138,488		$	396,444		$	272,008
Prepayment fees on Advances, net	98			1,831			445			4,075
Interest-bearing deposits	25			77			41			156
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	6,633			1,835			11,359			3,757
Federal funds sold	11,315			7,690			21,765			18,860
Investment securities:
Trading securities	6			6			10			11
Available-for-sale securities	967			1,278			2,749			2,289
Held-to-maturity securities	76,149			82,657			148,904			167,214
Total investment securities	77,122			83,941			151,663			169,514
Mortgage loans held for portfolio	74,279			64,008			146,716			131,892
Total interest income	384,663			297,870			728,433			600,262
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Consolidated Obligations:
Discount Notes	79,687			44,419			136,336			99,299
Bonds	197,573			169,512			380,186			326,836
Total Consolidated Obligations	277,260			213,931			516,522			426,135
Deposits	1,021			300			1,785			580
Loans from other FHLBanks	6			—			6			—
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock	608			1,029			1,079			2,092
Total interest expense	278,895			215,260			519,392			428,807
NET INTEREST INCOME	105,768			82,610			209,041			171,455
NON-INTEREST INCOME (LOSS):
Net (losses) gains on trading securities	(1		)	1			(4		)	1
Net losses on financial instruments held under fair value option	(6,397		)	(19,290		)	(12,458		)	(32,947		)
Net gains on derivatives and hedging activities	13,260			22,385			5,144			28,030
Standby Letters of Credit fees	2,816			3,086			5,679			6,230
Other, net	378			433			982			1,113
Total non-interest income (loss)	10,056			6,615			(657		)	2,427
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Compensation and benefits	10,479			10,210			22,244			20,778
Other operating expenses	4,412			5,943			9,574			11,852
Finance Agency	1,641			1,534			3,281			3,069
Office of Finance	1,018			1,023			2,120			2,218
Other	1,990			2,186			2,387			4,730
Total non-interest expense	19,540			20,896			39,606			42,647
INCOME BEFORE ASSESSMENTS	96,284			68,329			168,778			131,235
Affordable Housing Program assessments	9,690			6,936			16,986			13,333
NET INCOME	$	86,594		$	61,393		$	151,792		$	117,902

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of Contents

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CINCINNATI

STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016			2017			2016
Net income	$	86,594	$	61,393		$	151,792		$	117,902
Other comprehensive income adjustments:
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities	7		(158		)	(19		)	(14		)
Pension and postretirement benefits	511		709			853			1,181
Total other comprehensive income adjustments	518		551			834			1,167
Comprehensive income	$	87,112	$	61,944		$	152,626		$	119,069

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of Contents

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CINCINNATI

STATEMENTS OF CAPITAL

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)



	Capital Stock Class B - Putable					Retained Earnings								Accumulated Other Comprehensive			Total
	Shares		Par Value			Unrestricted			Restricted		Total			Loss			Capital
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2015	44,288		$	4,428,756		$	530,998		$	206,648	$	737,646		$	(13,277	)	$	5,153,125
Proceeds from sale of capital stock	356		35,663														35,663
Net shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock	(2,379	)	(237,883		)												(237,883		)
Comprehensive income						94,322			23,580		117,902			1,167			119,069
Cash dividends on capital stock						(86,969		)			(86,969		)				(86,969		)
BALANCE, JUNE 30, 2016	42,265		$	4,226,536		$	538,351		$	230,228	$	768,579		$	(12,110	)	$	4,983,005


BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2016	41,569		$	4,156,944		$	574,122		$	260,285	$	834,407		$	(13,256	)	$	4,978,095
Proceeds from sale of capital stock	2,502		250,196														250,196
Net shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock	(1,874	)	(187,405		)												(187,405		)
Comprehensive income						121,433			30,359		151,792			834			152,626
Cash dividends on capital stock						(95,629		)			(95,629		)				(95,629		)
BALANCE, JUNE 30, 2017	42,197		$	4,219,735		$	599,926		$	290,644	$	890,570		$	(12,422	)	$	5,097,883

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of Contents

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CINCINNATI

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	151,792		$	117,902
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	24,521			28,583
Net change in derivative and hedging activities	7,937			(36,990		)
Net change in fair value adjustments on trading securities	4			(1		)
Net change in fair value adjustments on financial instruments held under fair value option	12,458			32,947
Net change in:
Accrued interest receivable	(8,593		)	(9,752		)
Other assets	29,486			4,875
Accrued interest payable	2,723			17,189
Other liabilities	2,234			3,940
Total adjustments	70,770			40,791
Net cash provided by operating activities	222,562			158,693

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Net change in:
Interest-bearing deposits	31,358			(96,178		)
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	(636,212		)	5,613,722
Federal funds sold	(2,773,000		)	9,520,000
Premises, software, and equipment	(954		)	(1,009		)
Trading securities:
Proceeds from maturities of long-term	84			83
Available-for-sale securities:
Net decrease (increase) in short-term	950,000			(500,000		)
Held-to-maturity securities:
Net (increase) decrease in short-term	(1,510		)	1,672
Proceeds from maturities of long-term	1,067,947			1,297,615
Purchases of long-term	(1,695,542		)	(1,091,090		)
Advances:
Proceeds	1,061,870,216			591,327,098
Made	(1,063,075,660		)	(592,545,989		)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio:
Principal collected	605,081			679,892
Purchases	(925,134		)	(1,232,995		)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	(4,583,326		)	12,972,821





The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of Contents



(continued from previous page)
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CINCINNATI
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net (decrease) increase in deposits and pass-through reserves	$	(71,905	)	$	100,600
Net payments on derivative contracts with financing elements	(2,898		)	(7,640		)
Net proceeds from issuance of Consolidated Obligations:
Discount Notes	293,476,586			173,693,969
Bonds	13,680,336			28,842,319
Payments for maturing and retiring Consolidated Obligations:
Discount Notes	(288,823,225		)	(202,005,522		)
Bonds	(13,505,000		)	(13,522,053		)
Proceeds from issuance of capital stock	250,196			35,663
Payments for repurchase/redemption of mandatorily redeemable capital stock	(186,218		)	(179,929		)
Cash dividends paid	(95,629		)	(86,969		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	4,722,243			(13,129,562		)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	361,479			1,952
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period	8,737			10,136
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period	$	370,216		$	12,088
Supplemental Disclosures:
Interest paid	$	510,622		$	420,646
Affordable Housing Program payments, net	$	14,548		$	19,620

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of Contents

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CINCINNATI

NOTES TO UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Background Information

The Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati (the FHLB), a federally chartered corporation, is one of 11 District Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks). The FHLBanks serve the public by enhancing the availability of credit for residential mortgages and targeted community development. The FHLB is regulated by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency).

Note 1 - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying interim financial statements of the FHLB have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make assumptions and estimates. These assumptions and estimates affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of income and expenses. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The interim financial statements presented are unaudited, but they include all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows for such periods. These financial statements do not include all disclosures associated with annual financial statements and accordingly should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes included in the FHLB's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Results for the six months ended June 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the full year.

The FHLB presents certain financial instruments, including derivative instruments and securities purchased under agreements to resell, on a net basis when it has a legal right of offset and all other requirements for netting are met (collectively referred to as the netting requirements). For these instruments, the FHLB has elected to offset its asset and liability positions, as well as cash collateral received or pledged, when it has met the netting requirements. The FHLB did not have any offsetting liabilities related to its securities purchased under agreements to resell for the periods presented.

The net exposure for these financial instruments can change on a daily basis; therefore, there may be a delay between the time this exposure change is identified and additional collateral is requested, and the time this collateral is received or pledged. Likewise, there may be a delay for excess collateral to be returned. For derivative instruments that meet the requirements for netting, any excess cash collateral received or pledged is recognized as a derivative liability or derivative asset. Additional information regarding these agreements is provided in Note 10. Based on the fair value of the related collateral held, the securities purchased under agreements to resell were fully collateralized for the periods presented. For more information about the FHLB's investments in securities purchased under agreements to resell, see “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the FHLB's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The FHLB has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition or disclosure through the issuance of these financial statements and believes there have been no material subsequent events requiring additional disclosure or recognition in these financial statements.

Change in Accounting Principle. Effective October 1, 2016, the FHLB changed its method of accounting for the amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts and hedging basis adjustments on mortgage loans held for portfolio to the contractual interest method (contractual method). Historically, the FHLB deferred and amortized premiums and accreted discounts into interest income using the retrospective interest method (retrospective method), which used both actual prepayment experience and estimates of future principal repayments in calculating the estimated lives of the loans. While both the retrospective and contractual methods are acceptable under GAAP, the contractual method has become preferable for recognizing net unamortized premiums on mortgage loans held for portfolio because (i) it reduces the FHLB's reliance on subjective assumptions and estimates that affected the reported amounts of assets, capital and income in the financial statements and (ii) it represents the base accounting model articulated in GAAP applicable to accounting for the amortization of premiums and the accretion of discounts, whereas the retrospective method is only permitted by the guidance in narrowly defined circumstances.

The change to the contractual method for amortizing premiums and accreting discounts and hedging basis adjustments on mortgage loans has been reported through retroactive application of the change in accounting principle to all periods presented.

Table of Contents

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the effect of this change was an increase to net income (in thousands) of $5,017 and $13,179, respectively.

The following tables illustrate the effect of the change in amortization and accretion method on the FHLB's financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.



	As of and for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
(In thousands)	Previous Method		New Method		Effect of Change
Statements of Income:
Interest income - mortgage loans held for portfolio	$	58,433	$	64,008	$	5,575
Net interest income	77,035		82,610		5,575
Income before assessments	62,754		68,329		5,575
Affordable Housing Program assessments	6,378		6,936		558
Net income	56,376		61,393		5,017
Statements of Comprehensive Income:
Net income	$	56,376	$	61,393	$	5,017
Comprehensive income	56,927		61,944		5,017

Table of Contents



	As of and for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
(In thousands)	Previous Method		New Method		Effect of Change
Statements of Condition:
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net	$	8,509,933	$	8,496,646	$	(13,287	)
Total assets	106,141,555		106,128,268		(13,287		)
Affordable Housing Program payable	99,600		101,065		1,465
Total liabilities	101,143,798		101,145,263		1,465
Retained earnings:
Unrestricted	552,949		538,351		(14,598		)
Restricted	230,382		230,228		(154		)
Total retained earnings	783,331		768,579		(14,752		)
Total capital	4,997,757		4,983,005		(14,752		)
Total liabilities and capital	106,141,555		106,128,268		(13,287		)
Statements of Income:
Interest income - mortgage loans held for portfolio	$	117,248	$	131,892	$	14,644
Net interest income	156,811		171,455		14,644
Income before assessments	116,591		131,235		14,644
Affordable Housing Program assessments	11,868		13,333		1,465
Net income	104,723		117,902		13,179
Statements of Comprehensive Income:
Net income	$	104,723	$	117,902	$	13,179
Comprehensive income	105,890		119,069		13,179
Statements of Capital:
Total retained earnings, as of December 31, 2015	$	765,577	$	737,646	$	(27,931	)
Total comprehensive income	105,890		119,069		13,179
Total retained earnings, as of June 30, 2016	783,331		768,579		(14,752		)
Total capital	4,997,757		4,983,005		(14,752		)
Statements of Cash Flows:
Operating activities:
Net income	$	104,723	$	117,902	$	13,179
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	43,227		28,583		(14,644		)
Changes in:
Other liabilities	2,475		3,940		1,465
Total adjustments	53,970		40,791		(13,179		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	158,693		158,693		—

Note 2 - Recently Issued Accounting Standards and Interpretations

Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities. On March 30, 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amended guidance to shorten the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. Specifically, the amendments require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. This guidance is effective for the FHLB for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. This guidance should be applied using a modified retrospective method through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to

Table of Contents

retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The FHLB is in the process of evaluating this guidance, and its effect on the FHLB’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows has not yet been determined.

Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension and Postretirement Benefit Cost. On March 10, 2017, the FASB issued amended guidance that requires an employer to disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs (net benefit costs). The amendments also provide explicit guidance on how to present the service cost component and the other components of net benefit costs in the income statement and allow only the service cost component of net benefit cost to be eligible for capitalization. This guidance is effective for the FHLB for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. This guidance should be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net benefit costs in the income statement. For the capitalization of the service cost component of net benefit costs, this guidance should be applied prospectively on and after the effective date. While the FHLB is still in the process of evaluating this guidance, the FHLB does not expect the new guidance to have a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. On August 26, 2016, the FASB issued amendments to clarify guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the Statement of Cash Flows. This guidance is intended to reduce existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified on the Statement of Cash Flows. This guidance is effective for the FHLB for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. This guidance should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. The FHLB does not intend to adopt the new guidance early. At this time, the FHLB does not expect the new guidance to have any impact on the FHLB’s cash flows.

Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. On June 16, 2016, the FASB issued amended guidance for the accounting of credit losses on financial instruments. The amendments require entities to immediately record the full amount of expected credit losses in their loan portfolios. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. The guidance also requires, among other things, credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities to be recorded through an allowance for credit losses and expanded disclosure requirements. The guidance is effective for the FHLB for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early application is permitted as of the interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The guidance should be applied using a modified-retrospective approach, through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. In addition, entities are required to use a prospective transition approach for debt securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment had been recognized before the effective date. The FHLB does not intend to adopt the new guidance early. While the FHLB is still in the process of evaluating this guidance, the FHLB expects the guidance will result in an increase in the allowance for credit losses given the requirement to estimate losses for the entire estimated life of the financial asset. The extent of the impact on the FHLB’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows will depend upon the composition of the FHLB’s financial assets at the adoption date and the economic conditions and forecasts at that time.

Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments. On March 14, 2016, the FASB issued amendments to clarify the requirements for assessing whether contingent call (put) options that can accelerate the payment of principal on debt instruments are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts. The guidance requires entities to apply only the four-step decision sequence when assessing whether the economic characteristics and risks of call (put) options are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of their debt hosts. Consequently, when a call (put) option is contingently exercisable, an entity does not have to assess whether the event that triggers the ability to exercise a call (put) option is related to interest rates or credit risks. This guidance became effective for the FHLB for the interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2017. The adoption of this guidance had no effect on the FHLB's financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Table of Contents

Leases. On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued guidance which requires recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the Statement of Condition and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements. In particular, this guidance requires a lessee, of operating or finance leases, to recognize on the Statement of Condition a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. However, for leases with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. The guidance becomes effective for the FHLB for the interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and early application is permitted. The guidance requires lessors and lessees to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements using a modified retrospective approach. The FHLB does not intend to adopt the new guidance early. Upon adoption, the FHLB expects to report higher assets and liabilities as a result of including right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on its Statement of Condition. While the FHLB is still in the process of evaluating this guidance, the FHLB does not expect the new guidance to have a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. On January 5, 2016, the FASB issued amended guidance on certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. This guidance includes, but is not limited to, the following:


▪	Requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected the fair value option.


▪	Requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the Statement of Condition or the accompanying notes to the financial statements.


▪	Eliminates the requirement for public entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the Statement of Condition.

The guidance becomes effective for the FHLB for the interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is only permitted for certain provisions. The amendments, in general, should be applied by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the Statement of Condition as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The FHLB does not intend to adopt the new guidance early. While this guidance will affect the FHLB's disclosures, the FHLB does not expect the requirement to present the instrument-specific credit risk in other comprehensive income to have a material effect on the FHLB's financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Note 3 - Trading Securities

Table 3.1 - Trading Securities by Major Security Types (in thousands)



Fair Value	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Mortgage-backed securities:
Other U.S. obligation single-family mortgage-backed securities	$	882	$	970
Total	$	882	$	970

Table 3.2 - Net (Losses) Gains on Trading Securities (in thousands)



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016
Net (losses) gains on trading securities held at period end	$	(4	)	$	1
Net (losses) gains on trading securities	$	(4	)	$	1

Table of Contents

Note 4 - Available-for-Sale Securities

Table 4.1 - Available-for-Sale Securities by Major Security Types (in thousands)



	June 30, 2017
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Certificates of deposit	$	350,000	$	10	$	(6	)	$	350,004
Total	$	350,000	$	10	$	(6	)	$	350,004

	December 31, 2016
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Certificates of deposit	$	1,300,000	$	38	$	(15	)	$	1,300,023
Total	$	1,300,000	$	38	$	(15	)	$	1,300,023

All securities outstanding with gross unrealized losses at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months.

Table 4.2 - Available-for-Sale Securities by Contractual Maturity (in thousands)



	June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
Year of Maturity	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	350,000	$	350,004	$	1,300,000	$	1,300,023

Table 4.3 - Interest Rate Payment Terms of Available-for-Sale Securities (in thousands)



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Amortized cost of available-for-sale securities:
Fixed-rate	$	350,000	$	1,300,000

Realized Gains and Losses. The FHLB had no sales of securities out of its available-for-sale portfolio for the six months ended June 30, 2017 or 2016.

Table of Contents

Note 5 - Held-to-Maturity Securities

Table 5.1 - Held-to-Maturity Securities by Major Security Types (in thousands)



	June 30, 2017
	Amortized Cost ⁽¹⁾		Gross Unrecognized Holding Gains		Gross Unrecognized Holding Losses			Fair Value
Non-mortgage-backed securities:
Government-sponsored enterprises (GSE)	$	32,789	$	—	$	(3	)	$	32,786
Total non-mortgage-backed securities	32,789		—		(3		)	32,786
Mortgage-backed securities:
Other U.S. obligation single-family mortgage-backed securities	2,881,992		4,998		(15,951		)	2,871,039
GSE single-family mortgage-backed securities	7,457,569		44,301		(94,278		)	7,407,592
GSE multi-family mortgage-backed securities	4,315,028		7,903		(235		)	4,322,696
Total mortgage-backed securities	14,654,589		57,202		(110,464		)	14,601,327
Total	$	14,687,378	$	57,202	$	(110,467	)	$	14,634,113

	December 31, 2016
	Amortized Cost ⁽¹⁾		Gross Unrecognized Holding Gains		Gross Unrecognized Holding Losses			Fair Value
Non-mortgage-backed securities:
GSE	$	31,279	$	1	$	—		$	31,280
Total non-mortgage-backed securities	31,279		1		—			31,280
Mortgage-backed securities:
Other U.S. obligation single-family mortgage-backed securities	3,183,219		3,653		(23,151		)	3,163,721
GSE single-family mortgage-backed securities	8,186,733		36,161		(147,494		)	8,075,400
GSE multi-family mortgage-backed securities	3,145,748		988		(3,906		)	3,142,830
Total mortgage-backed securities	14,515,700		40,802		(174,551		)	14,381,951
Total	$	14,546,979	$	40,803	$	(174,551	)	$	14,413,231


(1)	Carrying value equals amortized cost.

Table 5.2 - Net Purchased Premiums Included in the Amortized Cost of Mortgage-backed Securities Classified as Held-to-Maturity (in thousands)



	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Premiums	$	54,391		$	60,519
Discounts	(27,190		)	(31,474		)
Net purchased premiums	$	27,201		$	29,045

Table of Contents

Table 5.3 summarizes the held-to-maturity securities with unrealized losses, which are aggregated by major security type and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.

Table 5.3 - Held-to-Maturity Securities in a Continuous Unrealized Loss Position (in thousands)



	June 30, 2017
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or more					Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
Non-mortgage-backed securities:
GSE	$	32,786	$	(3	)	$	—	$	—		$	32,786	$	(3	)
Total non-mortgage-backed securities	32,786		(3		)	—		—			32,786		(3		)
Mortgage-backed securities:
Other U.S. obligation single-family mortgage-backed securities	1,538,654		(15,951		)	—		—			1,538,654		(15,951		)
GSE single-family mortgage-backed securities	3,912,027		(53,875		)	1,122,601		(40,403		)	5,034,628		(94,278		)
GSE multi-family mortgage-backed securities	282,733		(235		)	—		—			282,733		(235		)
Total mortgage-backed securities	5,733,414		(70,061		)	1,122,601		(40,403		)	6,856,015		(110,464		)
Total	$	5,766,200	$	(70,064	)	$	1,122,601	$	(40,403	)	$	6,888,801	$	(110,467	)

	December 31, 2016
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or more					Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
Mortgage-backed securities:
Other U.S. obligation single-family mortgage-backed securities	$	2,151,584	$	(23,151	)	$	—	$	—		$	2,151,584	$	(23,151	)
GSE single-family mortgage-backed securities	4,548,897		(90,119		)	1,193,241		(57,375		)	5,742,138		(147,494		)
GSE multi-family mortgage-backed securities	1,897,043		(3,906		)	—		—			1,897,043		(3,906		)
Total	$	8,597,524	$	(117,176	)	$	1,193,241	$	(57,375	)	$	9,790,765	$	(174,551	)

Table 5.4 - Held-to-Maturity Securities by Contractual Maturity (in thousands)



	June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
Year of Maturity	Amortized Cost ⁽¹⁾		Fair Value		Amortized Cost ⁽¹⁾		Fair Value
Non-mortgage-backed securities:
Due in 1 year or less	$	32,789	$	32,786	$	31,279	$	31,280
Due after 1 year through 5 years	—		—		—		—
Due after 5 years through 10 years	—		—		—		—
Due after 10 years	—		—		—		—
Total non-mortgage-backed securities	32,789		32,786		31,279		31,280
Mortgage-backed securities ⁽²⁾	14,654,589		14,601,327		14,515,700		14,381,951
Total	$	14,687,378	$	14,634,113	$	14,546,979	$	14,413,231


(1)	Carrying value equals amortized cost.


(2)	Mortgage-backed securities are not presented by contractual maturity because their expected maturities will likely differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment fees.

Table of Contents

Table 5.5 - Interest Rate Payment Terms of Held-to-Maturity Securities (in thousands)



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Amortized cost of non-mortgage-backed securities:
Fixed-rate	$	32,789	$	31,279
Total amortized cost of non-mortgage-backed securities	32,789		31,279
Amortized cost of mortgage-backed securities:
Fixed-rate	8,878,017		9,706,072
Variable-rate	5,776,572		4,809,628
Total amortized cost of mortgage-backed securities	14,654,589		14,515,700
Total	$	14,687,378	$	14,546,979

Realized Gains and Losses. From time to time the FHLB may sell securities out of its held-to-maturity portfolio. These securities, generally, have less than 15 percent of the acquired principal outstanding at the time of the sale. These sales are considered maturities for the purposes of security classification. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the FHLB did not sell any held-to-maturity securities.

Note 6 - Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis

The FHLB evaluates any of its individual available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment securities holdings in an unrealized loss position for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis.

For its Other U.S. obligations and GSE investments (mortgage-backed securities and non-mortgage-backed securities), the FHLB has determined that the strength of the issuers' guarantees through direct obligations or support from the U.S. government is sufficient to protect the FHLB from losses based on current expectations. As a result, the FHLB determined that, as of June 30, 2017, all of the gross unrealized losses on these investments were temporary as the declines in market value of these securities were not attributable to credit quality. Furthermore, the FHLB does not intend to sell the investments, and it is not more likely than not that the FHLB will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases. As a result, the FHLB did not consider any of these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2017.

The FHLB also reviewed its available-for-sale securities that have experienced unrealized losses at June 30, 2017 and determined that the unrealized losses were temporary, based on the creditworthiness of the issuers and the related collateral characteristics, and that the FHLB will recover its entire amortized cost basis. Additionally, because the FHLB does not intend to sell these securities, nor is it more likely than not that the FHLB will be required to sell the securities before recovery, it did not consider the investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2017.

The FHLB did not consider any of its investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2016.

Note 7 - Advances

The FHLB offers a wide range of fixed- and variable-rate Advance products with different maturities, interest rates, payment characteristics and optionality. The following table presents Advance redemptions by contractual maturity, including index-amortizing Advances, which are presented according to their predetermined amortization schedules.

Table of Contents

Table 7.1 - Advance Redemption Terms (dollars in thousands)



	June 30, 2017					December 31, 2016
Redemption Term	Amount			Weighted Average Interest Rate		Amount			Weighted Average Interest Rate
Due in 1 year or less	$	36,268,570		1.27	%	$	23,129,060		0.85	%
Due after 1 year through 2 years	17,263,673			1.44		21,503,138			1.06
Due after 2 years through 3 years	10,306,830			1.49		14,292,353			1.12
Due after 3 years through 4 years	1,887,708			1.85		5,322,050			1.26
Due after 4 years through 5 years	727,943			2.11		963,105			1.78
Thereafter	4,657,756			1.95		4,697,315			1.75
Total par value	71,112,480			1.41		69,907,021			1.07
Commitment fees	(522		)			(534		)
Discount on Affordable Housing Program (AHP) Advances	(6,613		)			(7,435		)
Premiums	1,926					2,061
Discounts	(4,947		)			(5,994		)
Hedging adjustments	(14,316		)			(13,138		)
Fair value option valuation adjustments and accrued interest	63					93
Total	$	71,088,071				$	69,882,074

The FHLB offers certain fixed and variable-rate Advances to members that may be prepaid on specified dates (call dates) without incurring prepayment or termination fees (callable Advances). If the call option is exercised, replacement funding may be available to members. Other Advances may only be prepaid subject to a prepayment fee paid to the FHLB that makes the FHLB financially indifferent to the prepayment of the Advance.

Table 7.2 - Advances by Year of Contractual Maturity or Next Call Date (in thousands)



Year of Contractual Maturity or Next Call Date	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Due in 1 year or less	$	41,825,393	$	33,831,156
Due after 1 year through 2 years	16,949,195		15,901,805
Due after 2 years through 3 years	7,612,968		13,608,214
Due after 3 years through 4 years	2,831,913		2,982,425
Due after 4 years through 5 years	592,255		2,243,105
Thereafter	1,300,756		1,340,316
Total par value	$	71,112,480	$	69,907,021

The FHLB also offers putable Advances. With a putable Advance, the FHLB effectively purchases put options from the member that allows the FHLB to terminate the Advance at predetermined dates. The FHLB normally would exercise its put option when interest rates increase relative to contractual rates.

Table of Contents

Table 7.3 - Advances by Year of Contractual Maturity or Next Put Date for Putable Advances (in thousands)



Year of Contractual Maturity or Next Put Date	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Due in 1 year or less	$	36,545,070	$	23,499,560
Due after 1 year through 2 years	17,097,173		21,248,138
Due after 2 years through 3 years	10,306,830		14,286,853
Due after 3 years through 4 years	1,887,708		5,322,050
Due after 4 years through 5 years	727,943		963,105
Thereafter	4,547,756		4,587,315
Total par value	$	71,112,480	$	69,907,021

Table 7.4 - Advances by Interest Rate Payment Terms (in thousands)



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Total fixed-rate ⁽¹⁾	$	32,407,774	$	24,700,450
Total variable-rate ⁽¹⁾	38,704,706		45,206,571
Total par value	$	71,112,480	$	69,907,021


(1)	Payment terms based on current interest rate terms, which reflect any option exercises or rate conversions that have occurred subsequent to the related Advance issuance.

Table 7.5 - Borrowers Holding Five Percent or more of Total Advances, Including Any Known Affiliates that are Members of the FHLB (dollars in millions)



June 30, 2017					December 31, 2016
	Principal		% of Total Par Value of Advances			Principal		% of Total Par Value of Advances
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.	$	26,850	38	%	JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.	$	32,300	46	%
U.S. Bank, N.A.	9,783		14		U.S. Bank, N.A.	8,563		12
Fifth Third Bank	4,367		6		Total	$	40,863	58	%
Total	$	41,000	58	%

Note 8 - Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio

Table 8.1 - Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio (in thousands)



	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Unpaid principal balance:
Fixed rate medium-term single-family mortgage loans ⁽¹⁾	$	1,225,024		$	1,320,585
Fixed rate long-term single-family mortgage loans	7,999,172			7,605,088
Total unpaid principal balance	9,224,196			8,925,673
Premiums	215,517			211,058
Discounts	(3,567		)	(3,740		)
Hedging basis adjustments ⁽²⁾	12,044			16,869
Total mortgage loans held for portfolio	$	9,448,190		$	9,149,860


(1)	Medium-term is defined as a term of 15 years or less.


(2)	Represents the unamortized balance of the mortgage purchase commitments' market values at the time of settlement. The market value of the commitment is included in the basis of the mortgage loan and amortized accordingly.

Table of Contents

Table 8.2 - Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio by Collateral/Guarantee Type (in thousands)



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Unpaid principal balance:
Conventional mortgage loans	$	8,869,888	$	8,534,542
Federal Housing Administration (FHA) mortgage loans	354,308		391,131
Total unpaid principal balance	$	9,224,196	$	8,925,673

For information related to the FHLB's credit risk on mortgage loans and allowance for credit losses, see Note 9.

Table 8.3 - Members, Including Any Known Affiliates that are Members of the FHLB, and Former Members Selling Five Percent or more of Total Unpaid Principal (dollars in millions)



	June 30, 2017					December 31, 2016
	Principal		% of Total			Principal		% of Total
Union Savings Bank	$	3,118	34	%	Union Savings Bank	$	2,886	32	%
Guardian Savings Bank FSB	895		10		Guardian Savings Bank FSB	855		10
PNC Bank, N.A. ⁽¹⁾	583		6		PNC Bank, N.A. ⁽¹⁾	660		7


(1)	Former member.

Note 9 - Allowance for Credit Losses

The FHLB has established an allowance methodology for each of the FHLB's portfolio segments: credit products (Advances, Letters of Credit and other extensions of credit to members); FHA mortgage loans held for portfolio; and conventional mortgage loans held for portfolio.

Credit Products

The FHLB manages its credit exposure to credit products through an integrated approach that includes establishing a credit limit for each borrower, ongoing review of each borrower's financial condition, coupled with collateral and lending policies to limit risk of loss while balancing borrowers' needs for a reliable source of funding. In addition, the FHLB lends to eligible borrowers in accordance with federal law, including the FHLBank Act and Finance Agency regulations, which require the FHLB to obtain sufficient collateral to fully secure credit products. The estimated value of the collateral required to secure each member's credit products is calculated by applying collateral discounts, or haircuts, to the value of the collateral. The FHLB accepts certain investment securities, residential mortgage loans, deposits and other real estate related assets as collateral. In addition, community financial institutions are eligible to utilize expanded statutory collateral provisions for small business, agriculture loans and community development loans. The FHLB's capital stock owned by its member borrowers is also pledged as collateral. Collateral arrangements and a member’s borrowing capacity vary based on the financial condition and performance of the institution, the types of collateral pledged and the overall quality of those assets. The FHLB can also require additional or substitute collateral to protect its security interest. Management of the FHLB believes that these policies effectively manage the FHLB's credit risk from credit products.

Members experiencing financial difficulties are subject to FHLB-performed “stress tests” of the impact of poorly performing assets on the member’s capital and loss reserve positions. Depending on the results of these tests and the level of overcollateralization, a member may be allowed to maintain pledged loan assets in its custody, may be required to deliver those loans into the custody of the FHLB or its agent, and/or may be required to provide details on these loans to facilitate an estimate of their fair value. The FHLB perfects its security interest in all pledged collateral. The FHLBank Act affords any security interest granted to the FHLB by a member priority over the claims or rights of any other party except for claims or rights of a third party that would be entitled to priority under otherwise applicable law and that are held by a bona fide purchaser for value or by a secured party holding a prior perfected security interest.

Using a risk-based approach, the FHLB considers the payment status, collateralization levels, and borrower's financial condition to be indicators of credit quality for its credit products. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the FHLB had rights to collateral on a member-by-member basis with an estimated value in excess of its outstanding extensions of credit.

Table of Contents

The FHLB evaluates and makes changes to its collateral guidelines, as necessary, based on current market conditions. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the FHLB did not have any Advances that were past due, in non-accrual status or impaired. In addition, there were no troubled debt restructurings related to credit products of the FHLB during the six months ended June 30, 2017 or 2016.

The FHLB has not experienced any credit losses on Advances since it was founded in 1932. Based upon the collateral held as security, its credit extension and collateral policies and the repayment history on credit products, the FHLB did not record any credit losses on credit products as of June 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016. Accordingly, the FHLB did not record any allowance for credit losses on Advances.

At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the FHLB did not record any liability to reflect an allowance for credit losses for off-balance sheet credit exposures. See Note 19 for additional information on the FHLB's off-balance sheet credit exposure.

Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio - FHA

The FHLB invests in fixed-rate mortgage loans secured by one-to-four family residential properties insured by the FHA. The FHLB expects to recover any losses from such loans from the FHA. Any losses from these loans that are not recovered from the FHA would be due to a claim rejection by the FHA and, as such, would be recoverable from the selling participating financial institutions. Therefore, the FHLB only has credit risk for these loans if the seller or servicer fails to pay for losses not covered by the FHA insurance. As a result, the FHLB did not establish an allowance for credit losses on its FHA insured mortgage loans. Furthermore, due to the insurance, none of these mortgage loans have been placed on non-accrual status.

Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio - Conventional Mortgage Purchase Program (MPP)

The FHLB determines the allowance for conventional loans through analyses that include consideration of various data observations such as past performance, current performance, loan portfolio characteristics, collateral-related characteristics, industry data, and prevailing economic conditions. The measurement of the allowance for credit losses consists of: (1) collectively evaluating homogeneous pools of residential mortgage loans; (2) reviewing specifically identified loans for impairment; and (3) considering other relevant qualitative factors.

Collectively Evaluated Mortgage Loans. The credit risk analysis of conventional loans evaluated collectively for impairment considers historical delinquency migration, applies estimated loss severities, and incorporates the associated credit enhancements in order to determine the FHLB's best estimate of probable incurred losses at the reporting date. The FHLB performs the credit risk analysis of all conventional mortgage loans at the individual Master Commitment Contract level to properly determine the credit enhancements available to recover losses on loans under each individual Master Commitment Contract. The Master Commitment Contract is an agreement with a member in which the member agrees to make a best efforts attempt to sell a specific dollar amount of loans to the FHLB generally over a one-year period. Migration analysis is a methodology for determining, through the FHLB's experience over a historical period, the rate of default on loans. The FHLB applies migration analysis to loans based on payment status categories such as current, 30, 60, and 90 days past due. The FHLB then estimates, based on historical experience, how many loans in these categories may migrate to a loss realization event and applies a current loss severity to estimate losses. The estimated losses are then reduced by the probable cash flows resulting from available credit enhancements. Any credit enhancement cash flows that are projected and assessed as not probable of receipt do not reduce estimated losses.

Individually Evaluated Mortgage Loans. Conventional mortgage loans that are considered troubled debt restructurings are specifically identified for purposes of calculating the allowance for credit losses. The FHLB measures impairment of these specifically identified loans by either estimating the present value of expected cash flows, estimating the loan's observable market price, or estimating the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The FHLB removes specifically identified loans evaluated for impairment from the collectively evaluated mortgage loan population.

Qualitative Factors. The FHLB also assesses other qualitative factors in its estimation of loan losses for the collectively evaluated population. This amount represents a subjective management judgment, based on facts and circumstances that exist as of the reporting date, that is intended to cover other incurred losses that may not otherwise be captured in the methodology described above.

Rollforward of Allowance for Credit Losses on Mortgage Loans. The following tables present a rollforward of the allowance for credit losses on conventional mortgage loans as well as the recorded investment in mortgage loans by impairment methodology. The recorded investment in a loan is the unpaid principal balance of the loan adjusted for accrued interest,

Table of Contents

unamortized premiums or discounts, hedging basis adjustments and direct write-downs. The recorded investment is not net of any allowance.

Table 9.1 - Rollforward of Allowance for Credit Losses on Conventional Mortgage Loans (in thousands)



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016
Balance, beginning of period	$	880		$	1,483
Net recoveries (charge offs)	90			(266		)
Balance, end of period	$	970		$	1,217

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016
Balance, beginning of period	$	1,142		$	1,686
Net charge offs	(172		)	(469		)
Balance, end of period	$	970		$	1,217

Table 9.2 - Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded Investment on Conventional Mortgage Loans by Impairment Methodology (in thousands)



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Allowance for credit losses:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	970	$	1,142
Individually evaluated for impairment	—		—
Total allowance for credit losses	$	970	$	1,142
Recorded investment:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	9,109,542	$	8,772,681
Individually evaluated for impairment	9,648		9,889
Total recorded investment	$	9,119,190	$	8,782,570

Credit Enhancements. The conventional mortgage loans under the MPP are supported by some combination of credit enhancements (primary mortgage insurance (PMI), supplemental mortgage insurance (SMI) and the Lender Risk Account (LRA), including pooled LRA for those members participating in an aggregated MPP pool). The amount of credit enhancements needed to protect the FHLB against credit losses is determined through use of a third-party default model. These credit enhancements apply after a homeowner's equity is exhausted. Beginning in February 2011, the FHLB discontinued the use of SMI for all new loan purchases and replaced it with expanded use of the LRA. The LRA is funded by the FHLB as a portion of the purchase proceeds to cover expected losses. The LRA is recorded in other liabilities in the Statements of Condition. Excess funds over required balances are distributed to the member in accordance with a step-down schedule that is established upon execution of a Master Commitment Contract, subject to performance of the related loan pool. The LRA established for a pool of loans is limited to only covering losses of that specific pool of loans.

Table 9.3 - Changes in the LRA (in thousands)



	Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2017
LRA at beginning of year	$	187,684
Additions	10,556
Claims	(262		)
Scheduled distributions	(5,092		)
LRA at end of period	$	192,886

Table of Contents

Credit Quality Indicators. Key credit quality indicators for mortgage loans include the migration of past due loans, loans in process of foreclosure, and non-accrual loans. The table below summarizes the FHLB's key credit quality indicators for mortgage loans.

Table 9.4 - Recorded Investment in Delinquent Mortgage Loans (dollars in thousands)



	June 30, 2017
	Conventional MPP Loans			FHA Loans			Total
Past due 30-59 days delinquent	$	39,029		$	21,256		$	60,285
Past due 60-89 days delinquent	6,888			5,670			12,558
Past due 90 days or more delinquent	18,492			10,856			29,348
Total past due	64,409			37,782			102,191
Total current mortgage loans	9,054,781			321,606			9,376,387
Total mortgage loans	$	9,119,190		$	359,388		$	9,478,578
Other delinquency statistics:
In process of foreclosure, included above ⁽¹⁾	$	12,342		$	5,628		$	17,970
Serious delinquency rate ⁽²⁾	0.21		%	3.06		%	0.32		%
Past due 90 days or more still accruing interest ⁽³⁾	$	16,838		$	10,856		$	27,694
Loans on non-accrual status, included above	$	3,204		$	—		$	3,204

	December 31, 2016
	Conventional MPP Loans			FHA Loans			Total
Past due 30-59 days delinquent	$	39,409		$	23,206		$	62,615
Past due 60-89 days delinquent	9,350			8,275			17,625
Past due 90 days or more delinquent	21,773			14,054			35,827
Total past due	70,532			45,535			116,067
Total current mortgage loans	8,712,038			351,299			9,063,337
Total mortgage loans	$	8,782,570		$	396,834		$	9,179,404
Other delinquency statistics:
In process of foreclosure, included above ⁽¹⁾	$	15,412		$	5,841		$	21,253
Serious delinquency rate ⁽²⁾	0.26		%	3.59		%	0.40		%
Past due 90 days or more still accruing interest ⁽³⁾	$	19,408		$	14,054		$	33,462
Loans on non-accrual status, included above	$	3,908		$	—		$	3,908


(1)	Includes loans where the decision of foreclosure or a similar alternative such as pursuit of deed-in-lieu has been reported. Loans in process of foreclosure are included in past due or current loans dependent on their delinquency status.


(2)	Loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure (including past due or current loans in the process of foreclosure) expressed as a percentage of the total loan portfolio class recorded investment amount.


(3)	Each conventional loan past due 90 days or more still accruing interest is on a schedule/scheduled monthly settlement basis and contains one or more credit enhancements. Loans that are well secured and in the process of collection as a result of remaining credit enhancements and schedule/scheduled settlement are not placed on non-accrual status.

The FHLB did not have any real estate owned at June 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016.

Table of Contents

Individually Evaluated Impaired Loans. Table 9.5 presents the recorded investment, unpaid principal balance, and related allowance associated with loans individually evaluated for investment.

Table 9.5 - Individually Evaluated Impaired Loan Statistics by Product Class Level (in thousands)



	June 30, 2017						December 31, 2016
Conventional MPP loans	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
With no related allowance	$	9,648	$	9,455	$	—	$	9,889	$	9,708	$	—
With an allowance	—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	9,648	$	9,455	$	—	$	9,889	$	9,708	$	—

Table 9.6 - Average Recorded Investment of Individually Evaluated Impaired Loans and Related Interest Income Recognized (in thousands)



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017				2016
Individually impaired loans	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
Conventional MPP Loans	$	9,529	$	113	$	9,455	$	117

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017				2016
Individually impaired loans	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
Conventional MPP Loans	$	9,284	$	221	$	9,306	$	234

Troubled Debt Restructurings. A troubled debt restructuring is considered to have occurred when a concession is granted to a borrower for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties and that concession would not have been considered otherwise. The FHLB's troubled debt restructurings primarily involve loans where an agreement permits the recapitalization of past due amounts up to the original loan amount and certain loans discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy. A loan considered a troubled debt restructuring is individually evaluated for impairment when determining its related allowance for credit losses. Credit loss is measured by estimating expected cash shortfalls incurred as of the reporting date.

The FHLB's recorded investment in modified loans considered troubled debt restructurings was (in thousands) $9,648 and $9,889 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The amount of troubled debt restructurings is not considered material to the FHLB's financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Table of Contents

Note 10 - Derivatives and Hedging Activities

Nature of Business Activity

The FHLB is exposed to interest rate risk primarily from the effect of interest rate changes on its interest-earning assets and on the interest-bearing liabilities that finance these assets. The goal of the FHLB's interest-rate risk management strategy is not to eliminate interest-rate risk, but to manage it within appropriate limits. To mitigate the risk of loss, the FHLB has established policies and procedures, which include guidelines on the amount of exposure to interest rate changes it is willing to accept. In addition, the FHLB monitors the risk to its interest income, net interest margin and average maturity of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. See Note 11 - Derivatives and Hedging Activities in the FHLB's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information on the FHLB's derivative transactions.

The FHLB uses derivatives when they are considered to be the most cost-effective alternative to achieve the FHLB's financial and risk management objectives. The FHLB re-evaluates its hedging strategies from time to time and may change the hedging techniques it uses or adopt new strategies.

The FHLB transacts its derivatives with large banks and major broker-dealers. Some of these banks and broker-dealers or their affiliates buy, sell, and distribute Consolidated Obligations. Derivative transactions may be either executed with a counterparty (uncleared derivatives) or cleared through a Futures Commission Merchant (i.e., clearing agent) with a Derivative Clearing Organization (cleared derivatives).

Once a derivative transaction has been accepted for clearing by a Derivative Clearing Organization (Clearinghouse), the executing counterparty is replaced with the Clearinghouse. The FHLB is not a derivative dealer and does not trade derivatives for short-term profit.

Financial Statement Effect and Additional Financial Information

The notional amount of derivatives serves as a factor in determining periodic interest payments or cash flows received and paid. The notional amount reflects the FHLB's involvement in the various classes of financial instruments and represents neither the actual amounts exchanged nor the overall exposure of the FHLB to credit and market risk; the overall risk is much smaller. The risks of derivatives only can be measured meaningfully on a portfolio basis that takes into account the counterparties, the types of derivatives, the items being hedged and any offsets between the derivatives and the items being hedged.

Table of Contents

Table 10.1 summarizes the notional amount, fair value of derivative instruments (excluding fair value adjustments related to variation margin on settled daily contracts), and total derivative assets and liabilities. Total derivative assets and liabilities include the effect of netting adjustments, cash collateral and variation margin for daily settled contracts. For purposes of this disclosure, the derivative values include the fair value of derivatives and the related accrued interest.

Table 10.1 - Fair Value of Derivative Instruments (in thousands)



	June 30, 2017
	Notional Amount of Derivatives		Derivative Assets		Derivative Liabilities
Derivatives designated as fair value hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps	$	5,537,149	$	31,133	$	19,832
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps	5,902,265		1,148		54,834
Interest rate swaptions	2,255,000		6,774		—
Forward rate agreements	280,000		237		566
Mortgage delivery commitments	264,427		374		572
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments	8,701,692		8,533		55,972
Total derivatives before adjustments	$	14,238,841	39,666		75,804
Netting adjustments, cash collateral and variation margin for daily settled contracts ⁽¹⁾			38,483		(69,862		)
Total derivative assets and total derivative liabilities			$	78,149	$	5,942

	December 31, 2016
	Notional Amount of Derivatives		Derivative Assets		Derivative Liabilities
Derivatives designated as fair value hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps	$	5,660,420	$	37,379	$	26,610
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps	8,199,000		2,135		64,661
Interest rate swaptions	2,346,000		13,335		—
Forward rate agreements	511,000		681		166
Mortgage delivery commitments	440,849		319		10,628
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments	11,496,849		16,470		75,455
Total derivatives before adjustments	$	17,157,269	53,849		102,065
Netting adjustments and cash collateral ⁽¹⁾			50,904		(84,191		)
Total derivative assets and total derivative liabilities			$	104,753	$	17,874

(1)

Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the FHLB to settle positive and negative positions, cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed by the FHLB with the same clearing agent and/or counterparty, and effective January 3, 2017, includes fair value adjustments on derivatives for which variation margin is characterized as a daily settled contract. Cash collateral posted and related accrued interest was (in thousands) $79,634 and $180,169 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. Cash collateral received and related accrued interest was (in thousands) $25,919 and $45,074 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. Variation margin for daily settled contracts was (in thousands) $54,630 at June 30, 2017 and $0 at December 31, 2016.

Table of Contents

Table 10.2 presents the components of net gains on derivatives and hedging activities as presented in the Statements of Income.

Table 10.2 - Net Gains on Derivatives and Hedging Activities (in thousands)



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016
Derivatives and hedged items in fair value hedging relationships:
Interest rate swaps	$	(205	)	$	(1,142	)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Economic hedges:
Interest rate swaps	16,380			19,370
Interest rate swaptions	(2,053		)	(469		)
Forward rate agreements	(3,136		)	(9,761		)
Net interest settlements	(1,451		)	4,026
Mortgage delivery commitments	3,582			10,361
Total net gains related to derivatives not designated as hedging instruments	13,322			23,527
Other ⁽¹⁾	143			—
Net gains on derivatives and hedging activities	$	13,260		$	22,385

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016
Derivatives and hedged items in fair value hedging relationships:
Interest rate swaps	$	140		$	(2,870	)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Economic hedges:
Interest rate swaps	12,833			24,473
Interest rate swaptions	(10,369		)	(1,283		)
Forward rate agreements	(3,513		)	(19,032		)
Net interest settlements	(1,083		)	5,815
Mortgage delivery commitments	6,877			20,927
Total net gains related to derivatives not designated as hedging instruments	4,745			30,900
Other ⁽¹⁾	259			—
Net gains on derivatives and hedging activities	$	5,144		$	28,030


(1)	Consists of price alignment amount on derivatives for which variation margin is characterized as a daily settled contract.

Table of Contents

Table 10.3 presents by type of hedged item, the gains (losses) on derivatives and the related hedged items in fair value hedging relationships and the impact of those derivatives on the FHLB's net interest income.

Table 10.3 - Effect of Fair Value Hedge-Related Derivative Instruments (in thousands)



	Three Months Ended June 30,
2017	Gain/(Loss) on Derivative			Gain/(Loss) on Hedged Item			Net Fair Value Hedge Ineffectiveness			Effect of Derivatives on Net Interest Income⁽¹⁾
Hedged Item Type:
Advances	$	(9,666	)	$	9,279		$	(387	)	$	(4,744	)
Consolidated Bonds	806			(624		)	182			(157		)
Total	$	(8,860	)	$	8,655		$	(205	)	$	(4,901	)
2016
Hedged Item Type:
Advances	$	(10,587	)	$	9,346		$	(1,241	)	$	(16,109	)
Consolidated Bonds	(551		)	650			99			2,127
Total	$	(11,138	)	$	9,996		$	(1,142	)	$	(13,982	)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
2017	Gain/(Loss) on Derivative			Gain/(Loss) on Hedged Item			Net Fair Value Hedge Ineffectiveness			Effect of Derivatives on Net Interest Income⁽¹⁾
Hedged Item Type:
Advances	$	(299	)	$	110		$	(189	)	$	(11,445	)
Consolidated Bonds	(264		)	593			329			266
Total	$	(563	)	$	703		$	140		$	(11,179	)
2016
Hedged Item Type:
Advances	$	(54,225	)	$	51,471		$	(2,754	)	$	(33,396	)
Consolidated Bonds	2,254			(2,370		)	(116		)	5,438
Total	$	(51,971	)	$	49,101		$	(2,870	)	$	(27,958	)

(1)

For fair value hedge relationships, the net effect of derivatives on net interest income is included in the interest income or interest expense line item of the respective hedged item type. These amounts include the effect of net interest settlements attributable to designated fair value hedges but do not include (in thousands) $(683) and $(804) of (amortization)/accretion related to fair value hedging activities for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 and (in thousands) $(1,287) and $(1,682) for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

Credit Risk on Derivatives

The FHLB is subject to credit risk due to the risk of non-performance by counterparties to its derivative transactions, and manages credit risk through credit analysis, collateral requirements and adherence to the requirements set forth in its policies, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulations, and Finance Agency regulations.

For uncleared derivatives, the degree of credit risk depends on the extent to which master netting arrangements are included in these contracts to mitigate the risk. The FHLB requires collateral agreements with collateral delivery thresholds on the majority of its uncleared derivatives.

For cleared derivatives, the Clearinghouse is the FHLB's counterparty. The Clearinghouse notifies the clearing agent of the required initial and variation margin and the clearing agent in turn notifies the FHLB. The FHLB utilizes two Clearinghouses for all cleared derivative transactions, LCH.Clearnet LLC and CME Clearing. Effective January 3, 2017, CME Clearing made certain amendments to its rulebook changing the legal characterization of variation margin payments to be daily settlement

Table of Contents

payments, rather than collateral. Variation margin related to LCH.Clearnet LLC contracts continues to be presented as cash collateral. At both Clearinghouses, initial margin continues to be considered collateral. The requirement that the FHLB post initial and variation margin through the clearing agent, to the Clearinghouse, exposes the FHLB to credit risk if the clearing agent or the Clearinghouse fails to meet its obligations. The use of cleared derivatives is intended to mitigate credit risk exposure because a central counterparty is substituted for individual counterparties and collateral/payments for changes in the value of cleared derivatives is posted daily through a clearing agent.

The FHLB has analyzed the enforceability of offsetting rights incorporated in its cleared derivative transactions and determined that the exercise of those offsetting rights by a non-defaulting party under these transactions should be upheld under applicable law upon an event of default including bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar proceeding involving the Clearinghouse or the FHLB's clearing agent, or both. Based on this analysis, the FHLB presents a net derivative receivable or payable for all of its transactions through a particular clearing agent with a particular Clearinghouse.

Certain of the FHLB's uncleared derivative contracts contain provisions that require the FHLB to post additional collateral with its counterparties if there is deterioration in the FHLB's credit ratings. At June 30, 2017, the FHLB would not have been required to deliver any additional collateral if the FHLB's credit ratings had been lowered to the next lower rating. The aggregate fair value of all uncleared derivatives with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position (before cash collateral and related accrued interest) at June 30, 2017 was (in thousands) $7,061, for which the FHLB had posted collateral with a fair value of (in thousands) $2,683 in the normal course of business.

For cleared derivatives, the Clearinghouse determines initial margin requirements and generally credit ratings are not factored into the initial margin. However, clearing agents may require additional initial margin to be posted based on credit considerations, including, but not limited to, credit rating downgrades. At June 30, 2017, the FHLB was not required to post additional initial margin by its clearing agents based on credit considerations.

Offsetting of Derivative Assets and Derivative Liabilities

The FHLB presents derivative instruments, related cash collateral, including any initial and certain variation margin, received or pledged, and associated accrued interest, on a net basis by clearing agent and/or by counterparty when it has met the netting requirements.

Table of Contents

Table 10.4 presents separately the fair value of derivative instruments meeting or not meeting netting requirements, including the related collateral received from or pledged to counterparties and variation margin for daily settled contracts. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the FHLB did not receive or pledge any non-cash collateral. Any overcollateralization under an individual clearing agent and/or counterparty level is not included in the determination of the net unsecured amount.

Table 10.4 - Offsetting of Derivative Assets and Derivative Liabilities (in thousands)



	June 30, 2017						December 31, 2016
	Derivative Assets			Derivative Liabilities			Derivative Assets			Derivative Liabilities
Derivative instruments meeting netting requirements:
Gross recognized amount:
Uncleared derivatives	$	7,525		$	13,871		$	15,506		$	21,378
Cleared derivatives	31,530			60,795			37,343			69,893
Total gross recognized amount	39,055			74,666			52,849			91,271
Gross amounts of netting adjustments, cash collateral and variation margin for daily settled contracts ⁽¹⁾:
Uncleared derivatives	(7,324		)	(9,067		)	(14,737		)	(14,298		)
Cleared derivatives	45,807			(60,795		)	65,641			(69,893		)
Total gross amounts of netting adjustments, cash collateral and variation margin for daily settled contracts ⁽¹⁾	38,483			(69,862		)	50,904			(84,191		)
Net amounts after netting adjustments, cash collateral and variation margin for daily settled contracts:
Uncleared derivatives	201			4,804			769			7,080
Cleared derivatives	77,337			—			102,984			—
Total net amounts after netting adjustments, cash collateral and variation margin for daily settled contracts	77,538			4,804			103,753			7,080
Derivative instruments not meeting netting requirements ⁽²⁾:
Uncleared derivatives	611			1,138			1,000			10,794
Total derivative instruments not meeting netting requirements ⁽²⁾	611			1,138			1,000			10,794
Total derivative assets and total derivative liabilities:
Uncleared derivatives	812			5,942			1,769			17,874
Cleared derivatives	77,337			—			102,984			—
Total derivative assets and total derivative liabilities	$	78,149		$	5,942		$	104,753		$	17,874


(1)	Variation margin for daily settled contracts was (in thousands) $54,630 at June 30, 2017.


(2)	Represents mortgage delivery commitments and forward rate agreements that are not subject to an enforceable netting agreement.

Note 11 - Deposits

Table 11.1- Deposits (in thousands)



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Interest bearing:
Demand and overnight	$	660,692	$	611,432
Term	46,400		149,350
Other	4,539		4,521
Total interest bearing	711,631		765,303
Non-interest bearing:
Other	1,493		576
Total non-interest bearing	1,493		576
Total deposits	$	713,124	$	765,879

Table of Contents

The average interest rate paid on interest bearing deposits was 0.59 percent and 0.15 percent in the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and 0.49 percent and 0.14 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Note 12 - Consolidated Obligations

Table 12.1 - Consolidated Discount Notes Outstanding (dollars in thousands)



	Book Value		Par Value		Weighted Average Interest Rate ⁽¹⁾
June 30, 2017	$	49,359,582	$	49,416,627	0.97	%
December 31, 2016	$	44,689,662	$	44,710,521	0.46	%


(1)	Represents an implied rate without consideration of concessions.

Table 12.2 - Consolidated Bonds Outstanding by Contractual Maturity (dollars in thousands)



	June 30, 2017					December 31, 2016
Year of Contractual Maturity	Amount			Weighted Average Interest Rate		Amount			Weighted Average Interest Rate
Due in 1 year or less	$	24,708,175		1.10	%	$	20,970,750		0.87	%
Due after 1 year through 2 years	9,016,640			1.35		12,811,000			1.12
Due after 2 years through 3 years	4,816,000			1.95		4,359,000			1.81
Due after 3 years through 4 years	5,045,000			1.80		3,566,000			1.95
Due after 4 years through 5 years	3,341,000			2.27		4,970,000			1.87
Thereafter	6,398,000			2.68		6,496,000			2.65
Total par value	53,324,815			1.55		53,172,750			1.39
Premiums	92,432					84,275
Discounts	(30,506		)			(32,804		)
Hedging adjustments	(3,458		)			(2,865		)
Fair value option valuation adjustment and accrued interest	(23,974		)			(30,490		)
Total	$	53,359,309				$	53,190,866

Table 12.3 - Consolidated Bonds Outstanding by Call Features (in thousands)



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Par value of Consolidated Bonds:
Non-callable	$	47,032,815	$	46,007,750
Callable	6,292,000		7,165,000
Total par value	$	53,324,815	$	53,172,750

Table of Contents

Table 12.4 - Consolidated Bonds Outstanding by Contractual Maturity or Next Call Date (in thousands)



Year of Contractual Maturity or Next Call Date	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Due in 1 year or less	$	30,538,175	$	26,489,750
Due after 1 year through 2 years	8,354,640		12,006,000
Due after 2 years through 3 years	3,930,000		3,894,000
Due after 3 years through 4 years	4,065,000		2,805,000
Due after 4 years through 5 years	2,551,000		3,964,000
Thereafter	3,886,000		4,014,000
Total par value	$	53,324,815	$	53,172,750

Table 12.5 - Consolidated Bonds by Interest-rate Payment Type (in thousands)



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Par value of Consolidated Bonds:
Fixed-rate	$	33,294,815	$	34,682,750
Variable-rate	20,030,000		18,290,000
Step-up	—		200,000
Total par value	$	53,324,815	$	53,172,750

Note 13 - Affordable Housing Program (AHP)

Table 13.1 - Analysis of AHP Liability (in thousands)



Balance at December 31, 2016	$	104,883
Assessments (current year additions)	16,986
Subsidy uses, net	(14,548		)
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	107,321

Note 14 - Capital

Table 14.1 - Capital Requirements (dollars in thousands)



	June 30, 2017						December 31, 2016
	Minimum Requirement			Actual			Minimum Requirement			Actual
Risk-based capital	$	781,940		$	5,146,274		$	579,629		$	5,026,133
Capital-to-assets ratio (regulatory)	4.00		%	4.72		%	4.00		%	4.80		%
Regulatory capital	$	4,362,112		$	5,146,274		$	4,185,411		$	5,026,133
Leverage capital-to-assets ratio (regulatory)	5.00		%	7.08		%	5.00		%	7.21		%
Leverage capital	$	5,452,640		$	7,719,411		$	5,231,764		$	7,539,200

Restricted Retained Earnings. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 the FHLB had (in thousands) $290,644 and $260,285 in restricted retained earnings. These restricted retained earnings are not available to pay dividends but are available to absorb unexpected losses, if any, that the FHLB may experience.

Table of Contents

Table 14.2 - Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock Roll Forward (in thousands)



Balance, December 31, 2016	$	34,782
Capital stock subject to mandatory redemption reclassified from equity	187,405
Redemption (or other reduction) of mandatorily redeemable capital stock	(186,218		)
Balance, June 30, 2017	$	35,969

Table 14.3 - Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock by Contractual Year of Redemption (in thousands)



Contractual Year of Redemption	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Year 1	$	—	$	—
Year 2	1,942		29
Year 3	623		2,264
Year 4	4,637		865
Year 5	5,875		6,307
Thereafter ⁽¹⁾	551		623
Past contractual redemption date due to remaining activity ⁽²⁾	22,341		24,694
Total	$	35,969	$	34,782

(1)

Represents mandatorily redeemable capital stock resulting from a Finance Agency rule effective February 2016, that made captive insurance companies ineligible for FHLB membership. Captive insurance companies that were admitted as FHLB members prior to September 12, 2014, will have their membership terminated no later than February 19, 2021. Captive insurance companies that were admitted as FHLB members on or after September 12, 2014, had their membership terminated no later than February 19, 2017. The related mandatorily redeemable capital stock is not required to be redeemed until five years after the member's termination.


(2)	Represents mandatorily redeemable capital stock that is past the end of the contractual redemption period because there is activity outstanding to which the mandatorily redeemable capital stock relates.

Table of Contents

Note 15 - Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income

The following tables summarize the changes in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

Table 15.1 - Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income (in thousands)



	Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities			Pension and postretirement benefits			Total accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
BALANCE, MARCH 31, 2016	$	225		$	(12,886	)	$	(12,661	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassification:
Net unrealized losses	(158		)	—			(158		)
Reclassifications from other comprehensive income to net income:
Amortization - pension and postretirement benefits	—			709			709
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income	(158		)	709			551
BALANCE, JUNE 30, 2016	$	67		$	(12,177	)	$	(12,110	)


BALANCE, MARCH 31, 2017	$	(3	)	$	(12,937	)	$	(12,940	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassification:
Net unrealized gains	7			—			7
Reclassifications from other comprehensive income to net income:
Amortization - pension and postretirement benefits	—			511			511
Net current period other comprehensive income	7			511			518
BALANCE, JUNE 30, 2017	$	4		$	(12,426	)	$	(12,422	)



	Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities			Pension and postretirement benefits			Total accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2015	$	81		$	(13,358	)	$	(13,277	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassification:
Net unrealized losses	(14		)	—			(14		)
Reclassifications from other comprehensive income to net income:
Amortization - pension and postretirement benefits	—			1,181			1,181
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income	(14		)	1,181			1,167
BALANCE, JUNE 30, 2016	$	67		$	(12,177	)	$	(12,110	)


BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2016	$	23		$	(13,279	)	$	(13,256	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassification:
Net unrealized losses	(19		)	—			(19		)
Reclassifications from other comprehensive income to net income:
Amortization - pension and postretirement benefits	—			853			853
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income	(19		)	853			834
BALANCE, JUNE 30, 2017	$	4		$	(12,426	)	$	(12,422	)

Table of Contents

Note 16 - Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans

Qualified Defined Benefit Multi-employer Plan. The FHLB participates in the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan for Financial Institutions (Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan), a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan. Under the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan, contributions made by one participating employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers because assets contributed by an employer are not segregated in a separate account or restricted to provide benefits only to employees of that employer. Also, in the event a participating employer is unable to meet its contribution requirements, the required contributions for the other participating employers could increase proportionately. The Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan covers substantially all officers and employees of the FHLB who meet certain eligibility requirements. Contributions to the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan charged to compensation and benefit expense were $1,644,000 and $1,685,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $3,289,000 and $3,370,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Qualified Defined Contribution Plan. The FHLB also participates in the Pentegra Defined Contribution Plan for Financial Institutions, a tax-qualified, defined contribution pension plan. The FHLB contributes a percentage of the participants' compensation by making a matching contribution equal to a percentage of voluntary employee contributions, subject to certain limitations. The FHLB contributed $268,000 and $237,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $721,000 and $624,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Nonqualified Supplemental Defined Benefit Retirement Plan (Defined Benefit Retirement Plan). The FHLB maintains a nonqualified, unfunded defined benefit plan. The plan ensures that participants receive the full amount of benefits to which they would have been entitled under the qualified defined benefit plan in the absence of limits on benefit levels imposed by the IRS. There are no funded plan assets. The FHLB has established a grantor trust, which is included in held-to-maturity securities on the Statements of Condition, to meet future benefit obligations and current payments to beneficiaries.

Postretirement Benefits Plan. The FHLB also sponsors a postretirement benefits plan that includes health care and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees. Future retirees are eligible for the postretirement benefits plan if they were hired prior to August 1, 1990, are age 55 or older, and their age plus years of continuous service at retirement are greater than or equal to 80. Spouses are covered subject to required contributions. There are no funded plan assets that have been designated to provide postretirement benefits.

Table 16.1 - Net Periodic Benefit Cost (in thousands)



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	Defined Benefit Retirement Plan				Postretirement Benefits Plan
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Service cost	$	237	$	200	$	7	$	13
Interest cost	359		347		48		54
Amortization of net loss	509		698		2		11
Net periodic benefit cost	$	1,105	$	1,245	$	57	$	78

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	Defined Benefit Retirement Plan				Postretirement Benefits Plan
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Service cost	$	441	$	365	$	14	$	25
Interest cost	684		659		98		109
Amortization of net loss	850		1,158		3		23
Net periodic benefit cost	$	1,975	$	2,182	$	115	$	157

Table of Contents

Note 17 - Segment Information

The FHLB has identified two primary operating segments based on its method of internal reporting: Traditional Member Finance and the MPP. These segments reflect the FHLB's two primary Mission Asset Activities and the manner in which they are managed from the perspective of development, resource allocation, product delivery, pricing, credit risk and operational administration. The segments identify the principal ways the FHLB provides services to member stockholders.

Table 17.1 - Financial Performance by Operating Segment (in thousands)



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	Traditional Member Finance		MPP			Total
2017
Net interest income	$	82,116	$	23,652		$	105,768
Non-interest income (loss)	10,639		(583		)	10,056
Non-interest expense	16,980		2,560			19,540
Income before assessments	75,775		20,509			96,284
Affordable Housing Program assessments	7,639		2,051			9,690
Net income	$	68,136	$	18,458		$	86,594
2016
Net interest income	$	66,533	$	16,077		$	82,610
Non-interest income	6,207		408			6,615
Non-interest expense	18,279		2,617			20,896
Income before assessments	54,461		13,868			68,329
Affordable Housing Program assessments	5,549		1,387			6,936
Net income	$	48,912	$	12,481		$	61,393



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	Traditional Member Finance		MPP			Total
2017
Net interest income	$	161,990	$	47,051		$	209,041
Non-interest income (loss)	1,074		(1,731		)	(657		)
Non-interest expense	34,120		5,486			39,606
Income before assessments	128,944		39,834			168,778
Affordable Housing Program assessments	13,002		3,984			16,986
Net income	$	115,942	$	35,850		$	151,792
2016
Net interest income	$	135,714	$	35,741		$	171,455
Non-interest income	1,042		1,385			2,427
Non-interest expense	37,250		5,397			42,647
Income before assessments	99,506		31,729			131,235
Affordable Housing Program assessments	10,160		3,173			13,333
Net income	$	89,346	$	28,556		$	117,902

Table of Contents

Table 17.2 - Asset Balances by Operating Segment (in thousands)



	Assets
	Traditional Member Finance		MPP		Total
June 30, 2017	$	98,533,598	$	10,519,207	$	109,052,805
December 31, 2016	95,456,372		9,178,909		104,635,281

Note 18 - Fair Value Disclosures

The fair value amounts recorded on the Statements of Condition and presented in the related note disclosures have been determined by the FHLB using available market information and the FHLB's best judgment of appropriate valuation methods. The fair values reflect the FHLB's judgment of how a market participant would estimate the fair values.

Fair Value Hierarchy. The FHLB records trading securities, available-for-sale securities, derivative assets, derivative liabilities, certain Advances and certain Consolidated Obligation Bonds at fair value on a recurring basis, and on occasion, certain mortgage loans held for portfolio on a nonrecurring basis. GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy and requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The inputs are evaluated and an overall level for the measurement is determined. This overall level is an indication of how market observable the fair value measurement is. An entity must disclose the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the measurements are classified.

The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels:

Level 1 Inputs - Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in an active market that the reporting entity can access on the measurement date.

Level 2 Inputs - Inputs other than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable inputs for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, a Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. Level 2 inputs include the following: (1) quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; (2) quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; (3) inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals, and implied volatilities); and (4) inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3 Inputs - Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

The FHLB reviews the fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis. Changes in the observability of the valuation inputs may result in a reclassification of certain financial assets or liabilities. Such reclassifications are reported as transfers in/out at fair value as of the beginning of the quarter in which the changes occur. The FHLB did not have any transfers of assets or liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis during the six months ended June 30, 2017 or 2016.

Table of Contents

Table 18.1 presents the carrying value, fair value, and fair value hierarchy of financial assets and liabilities of the FHLB. These values do not represent an estimate of the overall market value of the FHLB as a going concern, which would take into account future business opportunities and the net profitability of assets versus liabilities.

Table 18.1 - Fair Value Summary (in thousands)



	June 30, 2017
			Fair Value
Financial Instruments	Carrying Value		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Netting Adjustments, Cash Collateral, and Variation Margin for Daily Settled Contracts⁽¹⁾
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	370,216	$	370,216	$	370,216	$	—	$	—	$	—
Interest-bearing deposits	190		190		—		190		—		—
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	5,865,699		5,865,703		—		5,865,703		—		—
Federal funds sold	7,030,000		7,030,000		—		7,030,000		—		—
Trading securities	882		882		—		882		—		—
Available-for-sale securities	350,004		350,004		—		350,004		—		—
Held-to-maturity securities	14,687,378		14,634,113		—		14,634,113		—		—
Advances ⁽²⁾	71,088,071		71,146,618		—		71,146,618		—		—
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net	9,447,220		9,487,449		—		9,468,253		19,196		—
Accrued interest receivable	118,472		118,472		—		118,472		—		—
Derivative assets	78,149		78,149		—		39,666		—		38,483
Liabilities:
Deposits	713,124		712,986		—		712,986		—		—
Consolidated Obligations:
Discount Notes	49,359,582		49,359,067		—		49,359,067		—		—
Bonds ⁽³⁾	53,359,309		53,513,451		—		53,513,451		—		—
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock	35,969		35,969		35,969		—		—		—
Accrued interest payable	127,328		127,328		—		127,328		—		—
Derivative liabilities	5,942		5,942		—		75,804		—		(69,862		)
Other:
Standby bond purchase agreements	—		725		—		725		—		—

(1)


(2)	Includes (in thousands) $15,063 of Advances recorded under the fair value option at June 30, 2017.


(3)	Includes (in thousands) $5,605,291 of Consolidated Obligation Bonds recorded under the fair value option at June 30, 2017.

Table of Contents



	December 31, 2016
			Fair Value
Financial Instruments	Carrying Value		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral⁽¹⁾
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	8,737	$	8,737	$	8,737	$	—	$	—	$	—
Interest-bearing deposits	129		129		—		129		—		—
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	5,229,487		5,229,487		—		5,229,487		—		—
Federal funds sold	4,257,000		4,257,000		—		4,257,000		—		—
Trading securities	970		970		—		970		—		—
Available-for-sale securities	1,300,023		1,300,023		—		1,300,023		—		—
Held-to-maturity securities	14,546,979		14,413,231		—		14,413,231		—		—
Advances⁽²⁾	69,882,074		69,842,730		—		69,842,730		—		—
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net	9,148,718		9,174,790		—		9,152,186		22,604		—
Accrued interest receivable	109,886		109,886		—		109,886		—		—
Derivative assets	104,753		104,753		—		53,849		—		50,904
Liabilities:
Deposits	765,879		765,628		—		765,628		—		—
Consolidated Obligations:
Discount Notes	44,689,662		44,689,594		—		44,689,594		—		—
Bonds ⁽³⁾	53,190,866		53,278,571		—		53,278,571		—		—
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock	34,782		34,782		34,782		—		—		—
Accrued interest payable	119,322		119,322		—		119,322		—		—
Derivative liabilities	17,874		17,874		—		102,065		—		(84,191		)
Other:
Standby bond purchase agreements	—		708		—		708		—		—


(1)	Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the FHLB to settle positive and negative positions and also cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed by the FHLB with the same counterparty.


(2)	Includes (in thousands) $15,093 of Advances recorded under the fair value option at December 31, 2016.


(3)	Includes (in thousands) $7,895,510 of Consolidated Obligation Bonds recorded under the fair value option at December 31, 2016.

Summary of Valuation Methodologies and Primary Inputs.

A description of the valuation methodologies and primary inputs is disclosed in Note 19 - Fair Value Disclosures in the FHLB's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have been no significant changes in the valuation methodologies during 2017.

Table of Contents

Fair Value Measurements.

Table 18.2 presents the fair value of financial assets and liabilities that are recorded on a recurring or nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016, by level within the fair value hierarchy. The FHLB records nonrecurring fair value adjustments to reflect partial write-downs on certain mortgage loans.

Table 18.2 - Fair Value Measurements (in thousands)



	Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2017
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Netting Adjustments, Cash Collateral, and Variation Margin for Daily Settled Contracts⁽¹⁾
Recurring fair value measurements - Assets
Trading securities:
Other U.S. obligation single-family mortgage-backed securities	$	882	$	—	$	882	$	—	$	—
Available-for-sale securities:
Certificates of deposit	350,004		—		350,004		—		—
Advances	15,063		—		15,063		—		—
Derivative assets:
Interest rate related	77,538		—		39,055		—		38,483
Forward rate agreements	237		—		237		—		—
Mortgage delivery commitments	374		—		374		—		—
Total derivative assets	78,149		—		39,666		—		38,483
Total assets at fair value	$	444,098	$	—	$	405,615	$	—	$	38,483

Recurring fair value measurements - Liabilities
Consolidated Obligation Bonds	$	5,605,291	$	—	$	5,605,291	$	—	$	—
Derivative liabilities:
Interest rate related	4,804		—		74,666		—		(69,862		)
Forward rate agreement	566		—		566		—		—
Mortgage delivery commitments	572		—		572		—		—
Total derivative liabilities	5,942		—		75,804		—		(69,862		)
Total liabilities at fair value	$	5,611,233	$	—	$	5,681,095	$	—	$	(69,862	)

Nonrecurring fair value measurements - Assets ⁽²⁾
Mortgage loans held for portfolio	$	409	$	—	$	—	$	409

(1)


(2)	The fair value information presented is as of the date the fair value adjustment was recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2017.

Table of Contents



	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Netting Adjustment and Cash Collateral ⁽¹⁾
Recurring fair value measurements - Assets
Trading securities:
Other U.S. obligation single-family mortgage-backed securities	$	970	$	—	$	970	$	—	$	—
Available-for-sale securities:
Certificates of deposit	1,300,023		—		1,300,023		—		—
Advances	15,093		—		15,093		—		—
Derivative assets:
Interest rate related	103,753		—		52,849		—		50,904
Forward rate agreements	681		—		681		—		—
Mortgage delivery commitments	319		—		319		—		—
Total derivative assets	104,753		—		53,849		—		50,904
Total assets at fair value	$	1,420,839	$	—	$	1,369,935	$	—	$	50,904

Recurring fair value measurements - Liabilities
Consolidated Obligation Bonds	$	7,895,510	$	—	$	7,895,510	$	—	$	—
Derivative liabilities:
Interest rate related	7,080		—		91,271		—		(84,191		)
Forward rate agreements	166		—		166		—		—
Mortgage delivery commitments	10,628		—		10,628		—		—
Total derivative liabilities	17,874		—		102,065		—		(84,191		)
Total liabilities at fair value	$	7,913,384	$	—	$	7,997,575	$	—	$	(84,191	)

Nonrecurring fair value measurements - Assets ⁽²⁾
Mortgage loans held for portfolio	$	1,388	$	—	$	—	$	1,388


(1)	Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the FHLB to settle positive and negative positions and also cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed by the FHLB with the same counterparty.


(2)	The fair value information presented is as of the date the fair value adjustment was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Fair Value Option. The fair value option provides an irrevocable option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected financial assets, financial liabilities, unrecognized firm commitments, and written loan commitments not previously carried at fair value. It requires a company to display the fair value of those assets and liabilities for which it has chosen to use fair value on the face of the Statements of Condition. Fair value is used for both the initial and subsequent measurement of the designated assets, liabilities and commitments, with the changes in fair value recognized in net income. If elected, interest income and interest expense on Advances and Consolidated Bonds carried at fair value are recognized based solely on the contractual amount of interest due or unpaid. Any transaction fees or costs are immediately recognized into other non-interest income or other non-interest expense.

The FHLB has elected the fair value option for certain financial instruments that either do not qualify for hedge accounting or may be at risk for not meeting hedge effectiveness requirements. These fair value elections were made primarily in an effort to mitigate the potential income statement volatility that can arise from economic hedging relationships in which the carrying value of the hedged item is not adjusted for changes in fair value.

Table of Contents

For instruments recorded under the fair value option, the related contractual interest income and contractual interest expense are recorded as part of net interest income on the Statements of Income. The remaining changes in fair value for instruments in which the fair value option has been elected are recorded as “Net losses on financial instruments held under fair value option” in the Statements of Income. The net losses on financial instruments held under the fair value option were (in thousands) $(6,397) and $(19,290) for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, and (in thousands) $(12,458) and $(32,947) for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. The FHLB has determined that no adjustments to the fair values of its instruments recorded under the fair value option for instrument-specific credit risk were necessary as of June 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016.

The following table reflects the difference between the aggregate unpaid principal balance outstanding and the aggregate fair value for Advances and Consolidated Bonds for which the fair value option has been elected.

Table 18.3 – Aggregate Unpaid Balance and Aggregate Fair Value (in thousands)



	June 30, 2017							December 31, 2016
	Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance		Aggregate Fair Value		Aggregate Fair Value Over/(Under) Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance			Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance		Aggregate Fair Value		Aggregate Fair Value Over/(Under) Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance
Advances ⁽¹⁾	$	15,000	$	15,063	$	63		$	15,000	$	15,093	$	93
Consolidated Bonds	5,629,265		5,605,291		(23,974		)	7,926,000		7,895,510		(30,490		)


(1)	At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, none of the Advances were 90 days or more past due or had been placed on non-accrual status.

Note 19 - Commitments and Contingencies

Table 19.1 - Off-Balance Sheet Commitments (in thousands)



	June 30, 2017						December 31, 2016
Notional Amount	Expire within one year		Expire after one year		Total		Expire within one year		Expire after one year		Total
Standby Letters of Credit outstanding	$	16,994,419	$	180,349	$	17,174,768	$	17,029,024	$	479,119	$	17,508,143
Commitments for standby bond purchases	38,275		59,440		97,715		28,810		77,240		106,050
Commitments to purchase mortgage loans	264,427		—		264,427		440,849		—		440,849
Unsettled Consolidated Discount Notes, at par ⁽¹⁾	43,000		—		43,000		5,500		—		5,500


(1)	Expiration is based on settlement period rather than underlying contractual maturity of Consolidated Obligations.

Legal Proceedings. From time to time, the FHLB is subject to legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. The FHLB would record an accrual for a loss contingency when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount could be reasonably estimated. After consultation with legal counsel, management does not anticipate that ultimate liability, if any, arising out of any matters will have a material effect on the FHLB's financial condition or results of operations.

Table of Contents

Note 20 - Transactions with Other FHLBanks

The FHLB notes all transactions with other FHLBanks on the face of its financial statements. Occasionally, the FHLB loans short-term funds to and borrows short-term funds from other FHLBanks. These loans and borrowings are transacted at then current market rates when traded. There were no such loans or borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016. The following table details the average daily balance of lending and borrowing between the FHLB and other FHLBanks for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

Table 20.1 - Lending and Borrowing Between the FHLB and Other FHLBanks (in thousands)



	Average Daily Balances for the
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016
Loans to other FHLBanks	$	28	$	—
Borrowings from other FHLBanks	1,381		—

In addition, the FHLB may, from time to time, assume the outstanding primary liability for Consolidated Obligations of another FHLBank (at then current market rates on the day when the transfer is traded) rather than issuing new debt for which the FHLB is the primary obligor. The FHLB then becomes the primary obligor on the transferred debt. There were no Consolidated Obligations transferred to the FHLB during the six months ended June 30, 2017 or 2016. The FHLB had no Consolidated Obligations transferred to other FHLBanks during these periods.

Note 21 - Transactions with Stockholders

As a cooperative, the FHLB's capital stock is owned by its members, by former members that retain the stock as provided in the FHLB's Capital Plan and by nonmember institutions that have acquired members and must retain the stock to support Advances or other activities with the FHLB. All Advances are issued to members and all mortgage loans held for portfolio are purchased from members. The FHLB also maintains demand deposit accounts for members, primarily to facilitate settlement activities that are directly related to Advances and mortgage loan purchases. Additionally, the FHLB may enter into interest rate swaps with its stockholders. The FHLB may not invest in any equity securities issued by its stockholders and it has not purchased any mortgage-backed securities securitized by, or other direct long-term investments in, its stockholders.

For financial statement purposes, the FHLB defines related parties as those members with more than 10 percent of the voting interests of the FHLB capital stock outstanding. Federal statute prescribes the voting rights of members in the election of both member and independent directors. For member directorships, the Finance Agency designates the number of member directorships in a given year and an eligible voting member may vote only for candidates seeking election in its respective state. For independent directors, the FHLB's Board of Directors nominates candidates to be placed on the ballot in an at-large election. For both member and independent director elections, a member is entitled to vote one share of required capital stock, subject to a statutory limitation, for each applicable directorship. Under this limitation, the total number of votes that a member may cast is limited to the average number of shares of the FHLB's capital stock that were required to be held by all members in that state as of the record date for voting. Nonmember stockholders are not eligible to vote in director elections. Due to these statutory limitations, no member owned more than 10 percent of the voting interests of the FHLB at June 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016.

All transactions with stockholders are entered into in the ordinary course of business. Finance Agency regulations require the FHLB to offer the same pricing for Advances and other services to all members regardless of asset or transaction size, charter type, or geographic location. However, the FHLB may, in pricing its Advances, distinguish among members based upon its assessment of the credit and other risks to the FHLB of lending to any particular member or upon other reasonable criteria that may be applied equally to all members. The FHLB's policies and procedures require that such standards and criteria be applied consistently and without discrimination to all members applying for Advances.

Table of Contents

Transactions with Directors' Financial Institutions. In the ordinary course of its business, the FHLB may provide products and services to members whose officers or directors serve as directors of the FHLB (Directors' Financial Institutions). Finance Agency regulations require that transactions with Directors' Financial Institutions be made on the same terms as those with any other member. The following table reflects balances with Directors' Financial Institutions for the items indicated below. The FHLB had no mortgage-backed securities or derivatives transactions with Directors' Financial Institutions at June 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016.

Table 21.1 - Transactions with Directors' Financial Institutions (dollars in millions)



	June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Balance		% of Total⁽¹⁾		Balance		% of Total ⁽¹⁾
Advances	$	3,335	4.7	%	$	3,947	5.6	%
MPP	112		1.2		234		2.6
Regulatory capital stock	182		4.3		166		4.0


(1)	Percentage of total principal (Advances), unpaid principal balance (MPP), and regulatory capital stock.

Concentrations. The following table shows regulatory capital stock balances, outstanding Advance principal balances, and unpaid principal balances of mortgage loans held for portfolio of stockholders holding five percent or more of regulatory capital stock and includes any known affiliates that are members of the FHLB.

Table 21.2 - Stockholders Holding Five Percent or more of Regulatory Capital Stock (dollars in millions)



	Regulatory Capital Stock				Advance		MPP Unpaid
June 30, 2017	Balance		% of Total		Principal		Principal Balance
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.	$	1,139	27	%	$	26,850	$	—
U.S. Bank, N.A.	548		13		9,783		25
The Huntington National Bank	282		7		2,957		420
Fifth Third Bank	248		6		4,367		2



	Regulatory Capital Stock				Advance		MPP Unpaid
December 31, 2016	Balance		% of Total		Principal		Principal Balance
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.	$	1,317	31	%	$	32,300	$	—
U.S. Bank, N.A.	475		11		8,563		27
Fifth Third Bank	248		6		2,517		2
The Huntington National Bank	244		6		2,433		388

Nonmember Affiliates. The FHLB has relationships with three nonmember affiliates, the Kentucky Housing Corporation, the Ohio Housing Finance Agency and the Tennessee Housing Development Agency. The FHLB had no investments in or borrowings to any of these nonmember affiliates at June 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016. The FHLB has executed standby bond purchase agreements with one state housing authority whereby the FHLB, for a fee, agrees as a liquidity provider if required, to purchase and hold the authority's bonds until the designated marketing agent can find a suitable investor or the housing authority repurchases the bond according to a schedule established by the standby agreement. During the first six months of 2017 and 2016, the FHLB was not required to purchase any bonds under these agreements.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

This document contains forward-looking statements that describe the objectives, expectations, estimates, and assessments of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati (the FHLB). These statements use words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “believes,” “could,” “estimates,” “may,” and “should.” By their nature, forward-looking statements relate to matters involving risks or uncertainties, some of which we may not be able to know, control, or completely manage. Actual future results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements or could affect the extent to which we are able to realize an objective, expectation, estimate, or assessment. Some of the risks and uncertainties that could affect our forward-looking statements include the following:

▪

the effects of economic, financial, credit, market, and member conditions on our financial condition and results of operations, including changes in economic growth, general liquidity conditions, inflation and deflation, interest rates, interest rate spreads, interest rate volatility, mortgage originations, prepayment activity, housing prices, asset delinquencies, and members' mergers and consolidations, deposit flows, liquidity needs, and loan demand;


▪	political events, including legislative, regulatory, federal government, judicial or other developments that could affect us, our members, our counterparties, other Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks) and other government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), and/or investors in the Federal Home Loan Bank System's (FHLBank System) debt securities, which are called Consolidated Obligations or Obligations;


▪	competitive forces, including those related to other sources of funding available to members, to purchases of mortgage loans, and to our issuance of Consolidated Obligations;


▪	the financial results and actions of other FHLBanks that could affect our ability, in relation to the FHLBank System's joint and several liability for Consolidated Obligations, to access the capital markets on favorable terms or preserve our profitability, or could alter the regulations and legislation to which we are subject;


▪	changes in ratings assigned to FHLBank System Obligations or the FHLB that could raise our funding cost;


▪	changes in investor demand for Obligations;


▪	the volatility of market prices, interest rates, credit quality, and other indices that could affect the value of investments and collateral we hold as security for member obligations and/or for counterparty obligations;


▪	the ability to attract and retain skilled management and other key employees;


▪	the ability to develop and support technology and information systems that effectively manage the risks we face (including cybersecurity risks);


▪	the risk of loss arising from failures or interruptions in our ongoing business operations, internal controls, information systems or other operating technologies;


▪	the ability to successfully manage new products and services; and


▪	the risk of loss arising from litigation filed against us or one or more other FHLBanks.

We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements made in this document.

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

The following table presents selected Statement of Condition data, Statement of Income data and financial ratios for the periods indicated. The FHLB's change to the contractual interest method for amortizing premiums and accreting discounts on mortgage loans held for portfolio has been reported through retroactive application of the change in accounting principle to all periods presented. See Note 1 of the Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements for related disclosures.



(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2017			March 31, 2017			December 31, 2016			September 30, 2016			June 30, 2016
STATEMENT OF CONDITION DATA AT PERIOD END:
Total assets	$	109,053		$	96,328		$	104,635		$	101,547		$	106,128
Advances	71,088			61,286			69,882			68,873			74,563
Mortgage loans held for portfolio	9,448			9,293			9,150			8,813			8,497
Allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans	1			1			1			1			1
Investments ⁽¹⁾	27,934			25,526			25,334			23,625			22,850
Consolidated Obligations, net:
Discount Notes	49,360			36,298			44,690			38,492			48,894
Bonds	53,359			53,497			53,191			56,750			50,458
Total Consolidated Obligations, net	102,719			89,795			97,881			95,242			99,352
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock	36			32			35			169			96
Capital:
Capital stock - putable	4,220			4,173			4,157			4,123			4,227
Retained earnings	890			853			834			788			768
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(12		)	(13		)	(13		)	(12		)	(12		)
Total capital	5,098			5,013			4,978			4,899			4,983
STATEMENT OF INCOME DATA FOR THE QUARTER:
Net interest income	$	106		$	103		$	98		$	93		$	82
Non-interest income (loss)	10			(11		)	48			(4		)	7
Non-interest expense	20			20			47			21			21
Affordable Housing Program assessments	9			7			10			7			7
Net income	$	87		$	65		$	89		$	61		$	61
FINANCIAL RATIOS FOR THE QUARTER:
Dividend payout ratio ⁽²⁾	56.3		%	71.9		%	47.5		%	69.0		%	69.2		%
Weighted average dividend rate ⁽³⁾	4.75			4.50			4.00			4.00			4.00
Return on average equity	6.94			5.25			7.15			4.82			4.93
Return on average assets	0.35			0.26			0.35			0.23			0.24
Net interest margin ⁽⁴⁾	0.42			0.41			0.39			0.36			0.32
Average equity to average assets	4.99			4.97			4.91			4.85			4.79
Regulatory capital ratio ⁽⁵⁾	4.72			5.25			4.80			5.00			4.80
Operating expense to average assets ⁽⁶⁾	0.060			0.068			0.072			0.064			0.062


(1)	Investments include interest bearing deposits in banks, securities purchased under agreements to resell, Federal funds sold, trading securities, available-for-sale securities, and held-to-maturity securities.


(2)	Dividend payout ratio is dividends declared in the period as a percentage of net income.


(3)	Weighted average dividend rates are dividends paid divided by the average number of shares of capital stock eligible for dividends.


(4)	Net interest margin is net interest income as a percentage of average earning assets.


(5)	Regulatory capital ratio is period-end regulatory capital (capital stock, mandatorily redeemable capital stock and retained earnings) as a percentage of period-end total assets.


(6)	Operating expenses comprise compensation and benefits and other operating expenses, which are included in non-interest expense.

Table of Contents

Financial Condition

Mission Asset Activity

The following table summarizes our financial condition.



	Ending Balances						Average Balances
	June 30,				December 31,		Six Months Ended June 30,				Year Ended December 31,
(In millions)	2017		2016		2016		2017		2016		2016
Total Assets	$	109,053	$	106,128	$	104,635	$	100,736	$	108,412	$	105,425
Mission Asset Activity:
Advances (principal)	71,112		74,461		69,907		67,562		71,075		69,214
Mortgage Purchase Program (MPP):
Mortgage loans held for portfolio (principal)	9,224		8,280		8,926		9,102		8,034		8,323
Mandatory Delivery Contracts (notional)	264		562		441		294		474		555
Total MPP	9,488		8,842		9,367		9,396		8,508		8,878
Letters of Credit (notional)	17,175		17,467		17,508		16,920		17,261		17,035
Total Mission Asset Activity	$	97,775	$	100,770	$	96,782	$	93,878	$	96,844	$	95,127

In the first six months of 2017, the FHLB fulfilled its mission by providing a key source of readily available and competitively priced wholesale funding to its member financial institutions, supporting its commitment to affordable housing and community investment, and paying stockholders a competitive dividend return on their capital investment.

The balance of Mission Asset Activity – which we define as Advances, Letters of Credit, and total MPP (including purchase commitments) – was $97.8 billion at June 30, 2017, an increase of $1.0 billion (one percent) from year-end 2016, primarily driven by higher Advance balances.

As of June 30, 2017, members funded an average of 3.2 percent of their assets with Advances, and the market penetration rate was relatively stable with over 70 percent of members holding Mission Asset Activity. As in recent years, most members continued to have modest demand for new Advance borrowings.

The MPP principal balance rose $0.3 billion (three percent) from year-end 2016. The slower growth in the MPP compared to the growth in 2016 reflected less refinancing activity by homeowners. During the first six months of 2017, we purchased $0.9 billion of mortgage loans, while principal reductions totaled $0.6 billion.

Based on earnings in the first six months of 2017, we accrued $17 million for the Affordable Housing Program (AHP) pool of funds to be available to members in 2018. In addition to the required AHP assessment, we continued our voluntary sponsorship of two other housing programs, which provide resources to pay for accessibility rehabilitation and emergency repairs for special needs and elderly homeowners and to help members aid their communities following natural disasters.

Investments and Other Assets

The balance of investments at June 30, 2017 was $27.9 billion, an increase of $2.6 billion (10 percent) from year-end 2016. At June 30, 2017, investments included $14.6 billion of mortgage-backed securities and $13.3 billion of other investments, which were mostly short-term instruments held for liquidity. All of our mortgage-backed securities held at June 30, 2017 were issued and guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or a U.S. agency.

Investments averaged $23.6 billion in the first six months of 2017, a decrease of $5.2 billion compared to the same period of 2016. The decline was primarily due to lower average liquidity investments, as average balances in the first six months of 2016 were larger than normal. We maintained a robust amount of asset liquidity throughout the first six months of 2017 across a variety of liquidity measures as discussed in the "Liquidity Risk" section of "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management."

Table of Contents

Capital

Capital adequacy remained strong in the first six months of 2017, surpassing all minimum regulatory capital requirements. The GAAP capital-to-assets ratio at June 30, 2017 was 4.67 percent, while the regulatory capital-to-assets ratio was 4.72 percent. Both ratios exceeded the regulatory required minimum of four percent. Regulatory capital includes mandatorily redeemable capital stock accounted for as a liability under GAAP. The amounts of GAAP and regulatory capital both increased $120 million in the first six months 2017, due to growth in retained earnings and purchases of capital stock associated with Mission Asset Activity.

Retained earnings totaled $890 million at June 30, 2017, an increase of $56 million (seven percent) from year-end 2016. We believe the amount of retained earnings is sufficient to protect against members' impairment risk of their capital stock investment in the FHLB and to provide the opportunity to stabilize or augment future dividends. Our capital policies and Capital Plan also have safeguards to ensure we meet regulatory and prudential capital requirements.

Results of Operations

Overall Results

The table below summarizes our results of operations.



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2017			2016			2017			2016			2016
Net income	$	87		$	61		$	152		$	118		$	268
Affordable Housing Program assessments	9			7			17			13			30
Return on average equity (ROE)	6.94		%	4.93		%	6.10		%	4.71		%	5.35		%
Return on average assets	0.35			0.24			0.30			0.22			0.25
Weighted average dividend rate	4.75			4.00			4.62			4.00			4.00
Average 3-month LIBOR	1.20			0.64			1.14			0.63			0.74
ROE spread to 3-month LIBOR	5.74			4.29			4.96			4.08			4.61
Dividend rate spread to 3-month LIBOR	3.55			3.36			3.48			3.37			3.26

In the three- and six-months comparison periods, net income increased $26 million (41 percent) and $34 million (29 percent), respectively. The increase was the result of higher net interest income, which was primarily the result of more favorable funding costs related to certain short-term and LIBOR-indexed assets and lower net amortization of premiums and discounts related to mortgage assets and Consolidated Obligations.

We believe that our operations and financial condition will continue to generate steady and competitive profitability, reflecting the combination of a stable business model and operating environment, a consistent and conservative management of risk, and a moderate increase in operating expenses. Our business model is structured to be able to absorb sharp changes in Mission Asset Activity because we can undertake commensurate changes in liability balances and capital. Factors that can cause significant periodic earnings volatility currently are changes in spreads between LIBOR and our short-term funding costs, recognition of net amortization, and unrealized fair value adjustments related to the use of derivatives.

Earnings levels continued to represent competitive returns on stockholders' capital investment. ROE was significantly higher than short-term rates in the periods presented above, while we maintained risk exposures in line with our appetite for a moderate to low-risk profile. The spread between ROE and 3-month LIBOR is a market benchmark we believe member stockholders use to assess the competitiveness of the return on their capital investment.

In June 2017, we paid stockholders a quarterly 4.75 percent annualized dividend rate on their capital investment in our company. This is an increase from the 4.50 percent dividend we paid in the first quarter of 2017 and the 4.00 percent dividend we paid in each quarter of 2016.

Table of Contents

Effect of Interest Rate Environment

Trends in market interest rates strongly influence the results of operations and profitability via how they affect members' demand for Mission Asset Activity, spreads on assets, funding costs and decisions in managing the tradeoffs in our market risk/return profile. The following table presents key market interest rates (obtained from Bloomberg L.P.).



									Six Months Ended June 30,
	Quarter 2 2017				Quarter 1 2017				2017		2016		Year 2016
	Ending		Average		Ending		Average		Average		Average		Ending		Average
Federal funds effective	1.06	%	0.95	%	0.82	%	0.70	%	0.82	%	0.36	%	0.55	%	0.39	%
3-month LIBOR	1.30		1.20		1.15		1.07		1.14		0.63		1.00		0.74
2-year LIBOR	1.62		1.55		1.62		1.56		1.55		0.91		1.45		1.00
10-year LIBOR	2.28		2.21		2.38		2.38		2.30		1.70		2.34		1.70
2-year U.S. Treasury	1.38		1.29		1.26		1.23		1.26		0.80		1.19		0.83
10-year U.S. Treasury	2.31		2.26		2.39		2.44		2.35		1.83		2.45		1.84
15-year mortgage current coupon ⁽¹⁾	2.40		2.34		2.48		2.50		2.42		1.93		2.49		1.94
30-year mortgage current coupon ⁽¹⁾	3.04		3.00		3.14		3.18		3.09		2.64		3.14		2.63


(1)	Simple average of current coupon rates of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac par mortgage-backed security indications.

The continued low interest rate environment in the first six months of 2017 benefited our results of operations. However, because the low rate environment has persisted for nearly a decade, much of the benefit has diminished over time as many assets and liabilities have fully repriced to the low rates. Results of operations continued to benefit from a lack of sharp changes in interest rates, especially upward movements.

In June 2017, the Federal Reserve increased its target overnight Federal funds from a 0.75 to 1.00 percent range to a 1.00 to 1.25 percent range. In addition, increases in short-term rates during the first six months of 2017 improved income because we have a substantial amount of assets that reprice to current interest rates quicker than the debt funding those assets.

Average long-term rates were approximately 0.50 percentage points higher in the first six months of 2017 compared to the same period of 2016. The increase contributed to a slowdown of activity in the mortgage market and led to a decline in the volume of mortgage loan purchases. However, the impact of fewer purchases was offset by a slower pace of portfolio paydowns.

We expect the recent movements in both short- and long-term rates will have only a modest overall effect on results of operations and profitability, outside of temporary fluctuations from net amortization and unrealized fair value adjustments on derivatives.

Effect of Economy and Financial Markets on Mission Asset Activity

In the last several years, the percentage of assets that members funded with Advances showed little variation, in the range of three to four percent. We would expect to see a broad-based increase in Advance demand when the economy experiences a sustained growth trend, when interest rates continue to increase over time, or if changes in Federal Reserve policy reduce other sources of liquidity available to members.

The relative balance between loan and deposit fluctuations can provide an indication of potential member Advance demand. For example, when aggregate loans grow quicker than aggregate deposits, we could see higher Advance demand from members. From March 31, 2016 to March 31, 2017 (the most recent period for which data are available), aggregate loan portfolios of Fifth District depository institutions grew $104.5 billion (7.4 percent) while their aggregate deposit balances rose $226.1 billion (10.3 percent). Most of the loan and deposit growth in this period occurred from our largest members, which is consistent with the concentration of nationwide financial activity. Excluding the five members that have over $50 billion of assets, aggregate loans increased $12.1 billion (5.9 percent) in the 12-month period while aggregate deposits grew by $13.8 billion (5.7 percent). This similar loan and deposit growth contributed to the small fluctuation in Advance balances from most members.

Table of Contents

Business Outlook and Risk Management

Our major business strategies, outlook for our business, and risk profiles and management have not changed substantially since our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management” provides details on current risk exposures. We have no material updates to provide for the regulatory or legislative environment since the 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

Mission Asset Activity

Mission Assets are the primary means by which we fulfill our mission with direct connections to members. We regularly monitor our balance sheet concentration of Mission Asset Activity. In the first six months of 2017, our Primary Mission Asset ratio, which measures the sum of average Advances and mortgage loans as a percentage of average Consolidated Obligations, was 81 percent, well above the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency) preferred ratio of 70 percent. In assessing overall mission achievement, we also consider supplemental sources of Mission Asset Activity, the most significant of which is Letters of Credit issued to members.

Credit Services

Credit Activity and Advance Composition

The table below shows trends in Advance balances by major programs and in the notional amount of Letters of Credit.



(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2017				March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Balance		Percent⁽¹⁾		Balance		Percent⁽¹⁾		Balance		Percent⁽¹⁾
Adjustable/Variable-Rate Indexed:
LIBOR	$	38,061	53	%	$	40,319	66	%	$	44,289	64	%
Other	643		1		442		—		918		1
Total	38,704		54		40,761		66		45,207		65
Fixed-Rate:
Repurchase based (REPO)	16,857		24		6,982		12		10,786		15
Regular Fixed-Rate	10,610		15		9,587		16		9,618		14
Putable ⁽²⁾	429		1		493		1		565		1
Amortizing/Mortgage Matched	2,698		4		2,656		4		2,596		4
Other	1,814		2		841		1		1,135		1
Total	32,408		46		20,559		34		24,700		35
Total Advances Principal	$	71,112	100	%	$	61,320	100	%	$	69,907	100	%

Letters of Credit (notional)	$	17,175			$	17,411			$	17,508


(1)	As a percentage of total Advances principal.


(2)	Excludes Putable Advances where the related put options have expired. Such Advances are classified based on their current terms.

The higher Advance balances at June 30, 2017 were primarily driven by increases in borrowings from a few large-asset members, in part due to a greater demand for REPO borrowings. REPOs tend to be our most volatile Advance product because of their short-term maturities. A majority of REPO Advances outstanding have overnight maturities.

The ending and average Letters of Credit balances were similar as of June 30, 2017 and 2016. We normally earn fees on Letters of Credit based on the actual average amount of the Letters utilized, which generally is less than the notional amount issued.

Table of Contents

Advance Usage

In addition to analyzing Advance balances by dollar trends and the number of members utilizing them, we monitor the degree to which members use Advances to fund their balance sheets. The following table shows the unweighted, average ratio of each member's Advance balance to its most-recently available figures for total assets.



	June 30, 2017		March 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
Average Advances-to-Assets for Members
Assets less than $1.0 billion (581 members)	3.00	%	2.87	%	3.07	%
Assets over $1.0 billion (81 members)	4.90		4.03		3.87
All members	3.23		3.01		3.17

The Advance usage ratio across all members was slightly higher at June 30, 2017, driven by the continued modest demand for Advances.

The following tables present principal balances for the five members with the largest Advance borrowings.



(Dollars in millions)
June 30, 2017					December 31, 2016
Name	Par Value of Advances		Percent of Total Par Value of Advances		Name	Par Value of Advances		Percent of Total Par Value of Advances
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.	$	26,850	38	%	JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.	$	32,300	46	%
U.S. Bank, N.A.	9,783		14		U.S. Bank, N.A.	8,563		12
Fifth Third Bank	4,367		6		Third Federal Savings and Loan Association	3,049		4
Third Federal Savings and Loan Association	3,541		5		Fifth Third Bank	2,517		4
The Huntington National Bank	2,957		4		The Huntington National Bank	2,433		3
Total of Top 5	$	47,498	67	%	Total of Top 5	$	48,862	69	%

Advance concentration ratios are influenced by, and generally similar to, concentration ratios of financial activity among our Fifth District financial institutions. We believe that having large financial institutions that actively use our Mission Asset Activity augments the value of membership to all members. For example, such activity improves our operating efficiency, increases our earnings and thereby contributions to housing and community investment programs, may enable us over time to obtain more favorable funding costs, and helps us maintain competitively priced Mission Asset Activity.

Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio (Mortgage Purchase Program, or MPP)

The table below shows principal purchases and reductions of loans in the MPP for the first six months of 2017.



(In millions)	MPP Principal
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	8,926
Principal purchases	904
Principal reductions	(606		)
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	9,224

Most of the principal purchases resulted from activity of our two largest sellers who drive program balances. In the first six months of 2017, 85 members sold us mortgage loans, with the number of monthly sellers averaging 58. All loans acquired in the first two quarters of 2017 were conventional loans.

We closely track the refinancing incentives of our mortgage assets (including loans in the MPP and mortgage-backed securities) because the option for homeowners to change their principal payments normally represents the largest portion of our market risk exposure and can affect MPP balances. MPP principal paydowns in the first six months of 2017 equated to a 10 percent

Table of Contents

annual constant prepayment rate, down from the 15 percent rate for all of 2016 due to an increase in mortgage rates in late 2016 that have persisted throughout 2017.

The MPP's composition of balances by loan type, original final maturity, and weighted-average mortgage note rate did not change materially in the first six months of 2017. The weighted average mortgage note rate fell only 0.03 percentage points to end the quarter at 3.92 percent. MPP yields earned in the first six months of 2017, after consideration of funding and hedging costs, continued to offer favorable returns relative to their market and credit risk exposure.

Investments

The table below presents the ending and average balances of the investment portfolio.



(In millions)	Six Months Ended				Year Ended
	June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Ending Balance		Average Balance		Ending Balance		Average Balance
Liquidity investments	$	13,279	$	8,875	$	10,818	$	12,177
Mortgage-backed securities	14,655		14,643		14,516		15,061
Other investments ⁽¹⁾	—		92		—		144
Total investments	$	27,934	$	23,610	$	25,334	$	27,382


(1)	The average balance includes the rights or obligations to cash collateral, which are included in the fair value of derivative assets or derivative liabilities on the Statements of Condition at period end.

We continued to maintain a robust amount of asset liquidity. Liquidity investment levels can vary significantly based on liquidity needs, the availability of acceptable net spreads, the number of eligible counterparties that meet our unsecured credit risk criteria, and changes in the amount of Mission Assets. It is normal for liquidity investments to vary by up to several billion dollars on a daily basis.

Our overarching strategy for balances of mortgage-backed securities is to keep holdings as close as possible to the regulatory maximum of three times regulatory capital, subject to the availability of securities that we believe provide acceptable risk/return tradeoffs. The ratio of mortgage-backed securities to regulatory capital was 2.85 at June 30, 2017. The balance of mortgage-backed securities at June 30, 2017 consisted of $11.8 billion of securities issued by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (of which $5.1 billion were floating-rate securities), $0.6 billion of floating-rate securities issued by the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), and $2.2 billion of securities issued by Ginnie Mae (which are primarily fixed rate). We held no private-label mortgage-backed securities.

The table below shows principal purchases and paydowns of our mortgage-backed securities for the first six months of 2017.



(In millions)	Mortgage-backed Securities Principal
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	14,487
Principal purchases	1,209
Principal paydowns	(1,068		)
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	14,628

Principal paydowns in the first six months of 2017 equated to a 14 percent annual constant prepayment rate, compared to an 18 percent rate in all of 2016.

Table of Contents

Consolidated Obligations

The table below presents the ending and average balances of our participations in Consolidated Obligations.



	Six Months Ended						Year Ended
(In millions)	June 30, 2017						December 31, 2016
	Ending Balance			Average Balance			Ending Balance			Average Balance
Discount Notes:
Par	$	49,417		$	40,598		$	44,711		$	49,853
Discount	(57		)	(27		)	(21		)	(18		)
Total Discount Notes	49,360			40,571			44,690			49,835
Bonds:
Unswapped fixed-rate	26,567			26,252			25,373			26,495
Unswapped adjustable-rate	20,030			19,871			18,290			14,512
Swapped fixed-rate	6,728			7,629			9,510			7,959
Total par Bonds	53,325			53,752			53,173			48,966
Other items ⁽¹⁾	34			31			18			68
Total Bonds	53,359			53,783			53,191			49,034
Total Consolidated Obligations⁽²⁾	$	102,719		$	94,354		$	97,881		$	98,869


(1)	Includes unamortized premiums/discounts, fair value option valuation adjustments, hedging and other basis adjustments.


(2)	The 11 FHLBanks have joint and several liability for the par amount of all of the Consolidated Obligations issued on their behalves. The par amount of the outstanding Consolidated Obligations for all of the FHLBanks was (in millions) $1,011,526 and $989,311 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

We fund LIBOR-indexed assets with Discount Notes, adjustable-rate Bonds, and swapped fixed-rate Bonds because they give us the ability to effectively match the LIBOR reset periods embedded in these assets. At June 30, 2017, the balance of Discount Notes was higher than at year-end 2016 due to the increase in short-term Advances and liquidity investments at the end of the quarter. However, the average balance of Discount Notes was lower in the first six months of 2017 primarily due to continuing to shift the composition of shorter-term funding away from Discount Notes towards adjustable-rate LIBOR Bonds, which normally have longer maturities than Discount Notes. The intent is to lower exposure to unforeseen liquidity risk and compression in spreads between LIBOR and Discount Notes. This change in funding composition has also reduced the income benefits associated with the elevated spreads in the first six months of 2017 (compared to historical averages) between LIBOR-indexed assets and interest paid on Discount Notes.

The composition of unswapped fixed-rate Bonds, which typically have initial maturities greater than one year, was relatively stable in the first six months of 2017 compared to 2016.

Deposits

Total deposits with us are normally a relatively minor source of low-cost funding. Total interest bearing deposits at June 30, 2017 were $0.7 billion, a decrease of seven percent from year-end 2016. The average balance of total interest bearing deposits in the first six months of 2017 was $0.7 billion, a decrease of 13 percent from the average balance during the same period of 2016.

Derivatives Hedging Activity and Liquidity

Our use of derivatives is discussed in the "Effect of the Use of Derivatives on Net Interest Income" section in "Results of Operations." Liquidity is discussed in the "Liquidity Risk" section in “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management.”

Table of Contents

Capital Resources

The following tables present capital amounts and capital-to-assets ratios, on both a GAAP and regulatory basis.



	Six Months Ended				Year Ended
(In millions)	June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Period End		Average		Period End		Average
GAAP and Regulatory Capital
GAAP Capital Stock	$	4,220	$	4,134	$	4,157	$	4,214
Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock	36		43		35		88
Regulatory Capital Stock	4,256		4,177		4,192		4,302
Retained Earnings	890		897		834		813
Regulatory Capital	$	5,146	$	5,074	$	5,026	$	5,115



	Six Months Ended				Year Ended
	June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Period End		Average		Period End		Average
GAAP and Regulatory Capital-to-Assets Ratio
GAAP	4.67	%	4.98	%	4.76	%	4.76	%
Regulatory ⁽¹⁾	4.72		5.04		4.80		4.85


(1)	At all times, the FHLBanks must maintain at least a four percent minimum regulatory capital-to-assets ratio.

We consider the regulatory ratio to be a better representation of financial leverage than the GAAP ratio because, although the GAAP ratio treats mandatorily redeemable capital stock as a liability, it protects investors in our debt in the same manner as GAAP capital stock and retained earnings.

A portion of capital stock is excess, meaning it is not required as a condition to being a member and not required to capitalize Mission Asset Activity. Excess capital stock provides a base of capital to manage financial leverage at prudent levels, augments loss protections for bondholders, and capitalizes a portion of growth in Mission Assets. The amount of excess capital stock, as defined by our Capital Plan, was $337 million at June 30, 2017. We could repurchase all excess stock on a timely basis and continue to meet our regulatory and prudential capital requirements. See the "Capital Adequacy" section in “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management” for discussion of our retained earnings.

Membership and Stockholders

In the first six months of 2017, we added four new member stockholders and lost 29 members, ending the quarter at 662 member stockholders. The 29 lost members included 13 members that merged with other Fifth District members, four that merged out of the District, one that withdrew from membership, and 11 captive insurance companies that were no longer eligible for membership effective February 2017 based on the Finance Agency’s 2016 final rule on membership requirements. The subsequent loss of the captive insurance company membership segment did not significantly affect our financial condition or results of operations.

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Components of Earnings and Return on Equity

The following table is a summary income statement for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. Each ROE percentage is computed by dividing income or expense for the category by the average amount of stockholders' equity for the period.



	Three Months Ended June 30,										Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2017					2016					2017					2016
	Amount			ROE ⁽¹⁾		Amount			ROE ⁽¹⁾		Amount			ROE ⁽¹⁾		Amount			ROE ⁽¹⁾
Net interest income	$	106		8.48	%	$	82		6.63	%	$	209		8.40	%	$	171		6.85	%
Non-interest income (loss):
Net gains on derivatives and hedging activities	13			1.06		23			1.80		5			0.20		28			1.12
Net losses on financial instruments held under fair value option	(6		)	(0.51	)	(19		)	(1.55	)	(13		)	(0.50	)	(33		)	(1.32	)
Other non-interest income, net	3			0.26		3			0.28		7			0.27		8			0.30
Total non-interest income (loss)	10			0.81		7			0.53		(1		)	(0.03	)	3			0.10
Total income	116			9.29		89			7.16		208			8.37		174			6.95
Non-interest expense	20			1.57		21			1.68		39			1.59		43			1.71
Affordable Housing Program assessments	9			0.78		7			0.55		17			0.68		13			0.53
Net income	$	87		6.94	%	$	61		4.93	%	$	152		6.10	%	$	118		4.71	%


(1)	The ROE amounts have been computed using dollars in thousands. Accordingly, recalculations based upon the disclosed amounts in millions may produce nominally different results.

Details on the individual factors contributing to the level and changes in profitability are explained in the sections below.

Net Interest Income

Components of Net Interest Income

The following table shows the major components of net interest income.



	Three Months Ended June 30,										Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2017					2016					2017					2016
	Amount			% of Earning Assets		Amount			% of Earning Assets		Amount			% of Earning Assets		Amount			% of Earning Assets
Components of net interest rate spread:
Net (amortization)/accretion ^{(1) (2)}	$	(4	)	(0.02	)%	$	(16	)	(0.06	)%	$	(10	)	(0.02	)%	$	(25	)	(0.05	)%
Prepayment fees on Advances, net ⁽²⁾	—			—		2			—		1			—		4			0.01
Other components of net interest rate spread	94			0.38		85			0.33		189			0.38		170			0.32
Total net interest rate spread	90			0.36		71			0.27		180			0.36		149			0.28
Earnings from funding assets with interest-free capital	16			0.06		11			0.05		29			0.06		22			0.04
Total net interest income/net interest margin ⁽³⁾	$	106		0.42	%	$	82		0.32	%	$	209		0.42	%	$	171		0.32	%


(1)	Includes (amortization)/accretion of premiums/discounts on mortgage assets and Consolidated Obligations and deferred transaction costs (concession fees) for Consolidated Obligations.


(2)	These components of net interest rate spread have been segregated to display their relative impact.


(3)	Net interest margin is net interest income as a percentage of average total interest earning assets.

Table of Contents

Net Amortization/Accretion: Net amortization/accretion (generally referred to as "amortization") includes monthly recognition of premiums and discounts paid on purchases of mortgage assets, as well as premiums, discounts and concessions paid on Consolidated Obligations. Periodic amortization adjustments do not necessarily indicate a trend in economic return over the entire life of mortgage assets, although it is one component of lifetime economic returns.

Amortization decreased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 primarily due to lower issuance costs (concession fees) recognized on Consolidated Obligations and lower amortization of purchased mortgage premiums. Concession fee recognition was higher in the 2016 periods because of the decision to call certain bonds as rates fell during the first two quarters of 2016. Amortization of purchased mortgage premiums was lower in the 2017 periods as a result of slower prepayments (actual and projected, as applicable) given the slight increase in mortgage rates in late 2016 that have persisted throughout 2017.

Prepayment Fees on Advances: Fees for members' early repayment of certain Advances are designed to make us economically indifferent to whether members hold Advances to maturity or repay them before maturity. Although Advance prepayment fees can be and have been significant in the past, they were minimal in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, reflecting a low amount of member prepayments of Advances.

Other Components of Net Interest Rate Spread: Excluding net amortization and prepayment fees, the total other components of net interest rate spread increased $9 million and $19 million in the three- and six-months comparison periods, respectively. The following factors primarily accounted for the net increase.

Six-Months Comparison

▪

Higher spreads on short-term and LIBOR-indexed Advances-Favorable: Net interest income from short-term and LIBOR-indexed Advances increased by an estimated $25 million primarily because their yields rose by more than the rates on Discount Notes and adjustable-rate Bonds funding them. These spreads widened due to interest rates on short-term Advances repricing quicker than the debt funding them and due to new regulatory requirements for the money market industry, which became effective in October 2016. These new requirements have raised investor demand for short-term government and GSE debt compared to prime institutional funds, improving the pricing advantage for our funding. This factor was partially offset by a decrease in the amount of LIBOR-indexed assets funded by lower-cost Discount Notes.


▪	Growth in MPP balances-Favorable: A $1.1 billion higher average balance of MPP loans increased net interest income by an estimated $8 million.


▪	Higher spreads on liquidity investments-Favorable: Higher spreads earned on liquidity investments increased net interest income by an estimated $7 million. These spreads widened primarily due to liquidity investments repricing to higher rates quicker than the debt funding them and due to the improved pricing advantage for our funding given the money market reform discussed above.

▪

Lower spreads on mortgage assets-Unfavorable: Lower spreads earned on MPP loans and mortgage-backed securities decreased net interest income by an estimated $17 million. The decline was driven by actions taken to reduce market risk exposure, and by continued paydowns of higher-yielding mortgage assets and low-cost debt. These negative factors were partially offset by an increase in spreads earned on MPP loans from additional utilization of hedging with derivatives (swaptions) and the decision to call and replace certain debt at lower rates throughout the first three quarters of 2016.


▪	Lower Advance balances-Unfavorable: The $3.6 billion decline in average Advance balances decreased net interest income by an estimated $4 million.

Three-Months Comparison

For the three-months comparison, the same factors generally affected the other components of net interest rate spread as in the six-months comparison and in approximately the same relative magnitude.

Earnings from Capital: The increase in earnings from funding assets with interest-free capital was due to modestly higher interest rates driven in part by the Federal Reserve's decision to raise short-term rates and the increase in short-term LIBOR.

Table of Contents

Average Balance Sheet and Rates

The following tables provide average balances and rates for major balance sheet accounts, which determine the changes in the net interest rate spread. All data include the impact of interest rate swaps, which we allocate to each asset and liability category according to their designated hedging relationship.



(Dollars in millions)	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017						June 30, 2016
	Average Balance		Interest		Average Rate ⁽¹⁾		Average Balance		Interest		Average Rate ⁽¹⁾
Assets:
Advances	$	67,749	$	216	1.27	%	$	69,538	$	140	0.81	%
Mortgage loans held for portfolio ⁽²⁾	9,363		74		3.18		8,361		63		3.08
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements	7,578		18		0.95		10,267		10		0.37
Interest-bearing deposits in banks ^{(3) (4) (5)}	437		1		0.91		1,062		1		0.51
Mortgage-backed securities	14,834		76		2.06		15,171		83		2.19
Other investments	33		—		0.62		31		—		0.48
Loans to other FHLBanks	—		—		—		—		—		—
Total interest-earning assets	99,994		385		1.54		104,430		297		1.14
Less: allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans	1						1
Other assets	256						203
Total assets	$	100,249					$	104,632
Liabilities and Capital:
Term deposits	$	54	—		0.76		$	83	—		0.37
Other interest bearing deposits ⁽⁵⁾	637		1		0.58		698		—		0.13
Discount Notes	39,101		80		0.82		50,876		44		0.35
Unswapped fixed-rate Bonds	26,516		130		1.97		27,392		138		2.02
Unswapped adjustable-rate Bonds	21,026		49		0.93		12,431		16		0.51
Swapped Bonds	7,277		19		1.04		7,434		16		0.86
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock	50		—		4.87		104		1		4.00
Other borrowings	3		—		0.88		—		—		—
Total interest-bearing liabilities	94,664		279		1.18		99,018		215		0.87
Non-interest bearing deposits	2						—
Other liabilities	581						604
Total capital	5,002						5,010
Total liabilities and capital	$	100,249					$	104,632

Net interest rate spread					0.36	%					0.27	%
Net interest income and net interest margin ⁽⁶⁾			$	106	0.42	%			$	82	0.32	%
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities					105.63	%					105.47	%


(1)	Amounts used to calculate average rates are based on dollars in thousands. Accordingly, recalculations based upon the disclosed amounts in millions may not produce the same results.


(2)	Non-accrual loans are included in average balances used to determine average rate.


(3)	Includes certificates of deposit that are classified as available-for-sale securities.


(4)	Includes available-for-sale securities based on their amortized costs. The yield information does not give effect to changes in fair value that are reflected as a component of stockholders' equity for available-for-sale securities.


(5)	The average balance amounts include the rights or obligations to cash collateral, which are included in the fair value of derivative assets or derivative liabilities on the Statements of Condition at period end.


(6)	Net interest margin is net interest income as a percentage of average total interest earning assets.

Table of Contents



(Dollars in millions)	Six Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2017						June 30, 2016
	Average Balance		Interest		Average Rate ⁽¹⁾		Average Balance		Interest		Average Rate ⁽¹⁾
Assets:
Advances	$	67,537	$	397	1.19	%	$	71,156	$	276	0.78	%
Mortgage loans held for portfolio ⁽²⁾	9,322		146		3.17		8,245		131		3.22
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements	8,277		33		0.81		12,598		23		0.36
Interest-bearing deposits in banks ^{(3) (4) (5)}	658		3		0.86		1,012		3		0.49
Mortgage-backed securities	14,643		149		2.05		15,183		167		2.21
Other investments	32		—		0.59		31		—		0.43
Loans to other FHLBanks	—		—		—		—		—		—
Total interest-earning assets	100,469		728		1.46		108,225		600		1.12
Less: allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans	1						1
Other assets	268						188
Total assets	$	100,736					$	108,412
Liabilities and Capital:
Term deposits	$	93	—		0.56		$	105	—		0.28
Other interest bearing deposits ⁽⁵⁾	640		2		0.48		739		1		0.12
Discount Notes	40,571		136		0.68		57,922		99		0.34
Unswapped fixed-rate Bonds	26,315		257		1.97		27,475		277		2.03
Unswapped adjustable-rate Bonds	19,871		85		0.86		10,398		26		0.50
Swapped Bonds	7,597		38		1.01		6,042		24		0.80
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock	43		1		5.04		105		2		4.01
Other borrowings	2		—		0.88		—		—		—
Total interest-bearing liabilities	95,132		519		1.10		102,786		429		0.84
Non-interest bearing deposits	2						—
Other liabilities	584						596
Total capital	5,018						5,030
Total liabilities and capital	$	100,736					$	108,412

Net interest rate spread					0.36	%					0.28	%
Net interest income and net interest margin ⁽⁶⁾			$	209	0.42	%			$	171	0.32	%
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities					105.61	%					105.29	%


(1)	Amounts used to calculate average rates are based on dollars in thousands. Accordingly, recalculations based upon the disclosed amounts in millions may not produce the same results.


(2)	Non-accrual loans are included in average balances used to determine average rate.


(3)	Includes certificates of deposit that are classified as available-for-sale securities.


(4)	Includes available-for-sale securities based on their amortized costs. The yield information does not give effect to changes in fair value that are reflected as a component of stockholders' equity for available-for-sale securities.


(5)	The average balance amounts include the rights or obligations to cash collateral, which are included in the fair value of derivative assets or derivative liabilities on the Statements of Condition at period end.


(6)	Net interest margin is net interest income as a percentage of average total interest earning assets.

Rates on shorter-term interest-earning assets (short-term Advances, Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements, and interest-bearing deposits in banks) rose in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 following the recent increases in the Federal funds target rate and subsequent increases in short-term LIBOR. The result was an increase in the net average rate on total interest-earning assets of 0.40 percentage points and 0.34 percentage points in the three- and six-months comparison, respectively.

Table of Contents

The increase in average rates on total interest-bearing liabilities was driven by higher rates on shorter-term liabilities that reset similarly to short-term assets, which represent the largest component of our liability portfolio.

The net impact was an overall increase in net interest spread and margin in the three- and six-months comparison due to the net effect of the favorable earnings factors discussed in the previous section, with the largest contributing factor being the larger increase in rates earned on certain short-term and LIBOR-indexed assets relative to the associated funding.

Volume/Rate Analysis

Changes in both average balances (volume) and interest rates influence changes in net interest income, as shown in the following table.



(In millions)	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 over 2016									Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 over 2016
	Volume ⁽¹⁾⁽³⁾			Rate ⁽²⁾⁽³⁾			Total			Volume ⁽¹⁾⁽³⁾			Rate ⁽²⁾⁽³⁾			Total
Increase (decrease) in interest income
Advances	$	(3	)	$	79		$	76		$	(15	)	$	136		$	121
Mortgage loans held for portfolio	8			3			11			17			(2		)	15
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements	(3		)	11			8			(10		)	20			10
Interest-bearing deposits in banks	(1		)	1			—			(1		)	1			—
Mortgage-backed securities	(2		)	(5		)	(7		)	(6		)	(12		)	(18		)
Other investments	—			—			—			—			—			—
Loans to other FHLBanks	—			—			—			—			—			—
Total	(1		)	89			88			(15		)	143			128
Increase (decrease) in interest expense
Term deposits	—			—			—			—			—			—
Other interest-bearing deposits	—			1			1			—			1			1
Discount Notes	(12		)	48			36			(37		)	74			37
Unswapped fixed-rate Bonds	(4		)	(4		)	(8		)	(12		)	(8		)	(20		)
Unswapped adjustable-rate Bonds	15			18			33			33			26			59
Swapped Bonds	—			3			3			7			7			14
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock	(1		)	—			(1		)	(1		)	—			(1		)
Other borrowings	—			—			—			—			—			—
Total	(2		)	66			64			(10		)	100			90
Increase (decrease) in net interest income	$	1		$	23		$	24		$	(5	)	$	43		$	38


(1)	Volume changes are calculated as the change in volume multiplied by the prior year rate.


(2)	Rate changes are calculated as the change in rate multiplied by the prior year average balance.


(3)	Changes that are not identifiable as either volume-related or rate-related, but rather are equally attributable to both volume and rate changes, have been allocated to the volume and rate categories based upon the proportion of the absolute value of the volume and rate changes.

Table of Contents

Effect of the Use of Derivatives on Net Interest Income

The following table shows the effect of using derivatives on net interest income. The effect on earnings from other components of derivatives, including market value adjustments, is provided in “Non-Interest Income and Non-Interest Expense.”



(In millions)	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Advances:
Amortization of hedging activities in net interest income	$	(1	)	$	(1	)	$	(1	)	$	(2	)
Net interest settlements included in net interest income	(5		)	(16		)	(11		)	(33		)
Mortgage loans:
Amortization of derivative fair value adjustments in net interest income	—			(2		)	(2		)	(4		)
Consolidated Obligation Bonds:
Net interest settlements included in net interest income	—			2			—			6
Decrease to net interest income	$	(6	)	$	(17	)	$	(14	)	$	(33	)

Most of our use of derivatives synthetically convert the intermediate- and long-term fixed interest rates on certain Advances and Bonds to adjustable-coupon rates tied to short-term LIBOR (one- and three-month repricing resets). These adjustable-rate coupons normally carry lower interest rates than the fixed-rates. The use of derivatives lowered net interest income in each period primarily because the Advances that were swapped to short-term LIBOR had higher fixed interest rates than the Bonds that were swapped to short-term LIBOR. However, the reduction in earnings was less in the three and six months of 2017 due to the recent increases in short-term LIBOR.

Non-Interest Income and Non-Interest Expense

The following table presents non-interest income and non-interest expense.



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2017			2016			2017			2016
Non-interest income (loss)
Net gains on derivatives and hedging activities	$	13		$	23		$	5		$	28
Net losses on financial instruments held under fair value option	(6		)	(19		)	(13		)	(33		)
Other non-interest income, net	3			3			7			8
Total non-interest income (loss)	$	10		$	7		$	(1	)	$	3
Non-interest expense
Compensation and benefits	$	11		$	10		$	22		$	21
Other operating expense	4			6			10			12
Finance Agency	2			2			3			3
Office of Finance	1			1			2			2
Other	2			2			2			5
Total non-interest expense	$	20		$	21		$	39		$	43
Average total assets	$	100,249		$	104,632		$	100,736		$	108,412
Average regulatory capital	5,064			5,126			5,074			5,147
Total non-interest expense to average total assets ⁽¹⁾	0.08		%	0.08		%	0.08		%	0.08		%
Total non-interest expense to average regulatory capital ⁽¹⁾	1.55			1.64			1.57			1.67


(1)	Amounts used to calculate percentages are based on dollars in thousands. Accordingly, recalculations based upon the disclosed amounts in millions may not produce the same results.

Non-interest income (loss) decreased in the first six months of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 primarily due to higher net losses related to derivatives, hedged items, and other financial instruments carried at fair value in 2017. The table below presents further information on the effect of derivatives and hedging activities on non-interest income.

Table of Contents

Non-interest expense decreased in the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 primarily due to lower other non-interest expense, which resulted primarily from less recognition of concession fees on Consolidated Obligations held at fair value, and lower operating expenses driven by a decrease in legal fees.

Effect of Derivatives and Hedging Activities on Non-Interest Income

The following tables present the net effect of derivatives and hedging activities on non-interest income.



(In millions)	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Advances		Mortgage Loans		Consolidated Obligation Bonds			Balance Sheet ⁽¹⁾			Total
Net effect of derivatives and hedging activities
Gains (losses) on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting	$	—	$	—	$	15		$	(2	)	$	13
Total net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities	—		—		15			(2		)	13
Net losses on financial instruments held under fair value option ⁽²⁾	—		—		(6		)	—			(6		)
Total net effect on non-interest income	$	—	$	—	$	9		$	(2	)	$	7



(In millions)	Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
	Advances			Mortgage Loans		Consolidated Obligation Bonds			Balance Sheet ⁽¹⁾		Total
Net effect of derivatives and hedging activities
Losses on fair value hedges	$	(1	)	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	(1	)
Gains on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting	—			1		23			—		24
Total net (losses) gains on derivatives and hedging activities	(1		)	1		23			—		23
Net losses on financial instruments held under fair value option ⁽²⁾	—			—		(19		)	—		(19		)
Total net effect on non-interest income	$	(1	)	$	1	$	4		$	—	$	4



(In millions)	Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Advances		Mortgage Loans		Consolidated Obligation Bonds			Balance Sheet ⁽¹⁾			Total
Net effect of derivatives and hedging activities
Gains (losses) on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting	$	—	$	3	$	12		$	(10	)	$	5
Total net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities	—		3		12			(10		)	5
Net losses on financial instruments held under fair value option ⁽²⁾	—		—		(13		)	—			(13		)
Total net effect on non-interest income	$	—	$	3	$	(1	)	$	(10	)	$	(8	)



(In millions)	Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
	Advances			Mortgage Loans		Consolidated Obligation Bonds			Balance Sheet ⁽¹⁾			Total
Net effect of derivatives and hedging activities
Losses on fair value hedges	$	(3	)	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	(3	)
(Losses) gains on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting	(1		)	2		31			(1		)	31
Total net (losses) gains on derivatives and hedging activities	(4		)	2		31			(1		)	28
Net losses on financial instruments held under fair value option ⁽²⁾	—			—		(33		)	—			(33		)
Total net effect on non-interest income	$	(4	)	$	2	$	(2	)	$	(1	)	$	(5	)


(1)	Balance sheet includes swaptions, which are not designated as hedging a specific financial instrument.


(2)	Includes only those gains or losses on financial instruments held at fair value that have an economic derivative "assigned."

Table of Contents

Net income volatility in derivatives and hedging activities was modest compared to the notional principal amounts and consistent with the close hedging relationships of our derivative transactions. The volatility represents both unrealized fair value gains and losses on instruments we expect to hold to maturity, and the realized costs of utilizing swaptions to hedge residual risk exposure to interest rates.

Segment Information

Note 17 of the Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements presents information on our two operating business segments. We manage financial operations and market risk exposure primarily at the macro level, and within the context of the entire balance sheet, rather than exclusively at the level of individual segments. Under this approach, the market risk/return profile of each segment may not match, or possibly even have the same trends as, what would occur if we managed each segment on a stand-alone basis. The tables below summarize each segment's operating results for the periods shown.



(Dollars in millions)	Traditional Member Finance			MPP			Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
Net interest income	$	82		$	24		$	106
Net income	$	68		$	19		$	87
Average assets	$	89,892		$	10,357		$	100,249
Assumed average capital allocation	$	4,485		$	517		$	5,002
Return on average assets⁽¹⁾	0.30		%	0.71		%	0.35		%
Return on average equity⁽¹⁾	6.09		%	14.32		%	6.94		%
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Net interest income	$	67		$	15		$	82
Net income	$	49		$	12		$	61
Average assets	$	96,242		$	8,390		$	104,632
Assumed average capital allocation	$	4,609		$	401		$	5,010
Return on average assets⁽¹⁾	0.20		%	0.60		%	0.24		%
Return on average equity⁽¹⁾	4.27		%	12.53		%	4.93		%



(Dollars in millions)	Traditional Member Finance			MPP			Total
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Net interest income	$	162		$	47		$	209
Net income	$	116		$	36		$	152
Average assets	$	90,685		$	10,051		$	100,736
Assumed average capital allocation	$	4,517		$	501		$	5,018
Return on average assets⁽¹⁾	0.26		%	0.72		%	0.30		%
Return on average equity⁽¹⁾	5.18		%	14.44		%	6.10		%
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Net interest income	$	136		$	35		$	171
Net income	$	89		$	29		$	118
Average assets	$	100,139		$	8,273		$	108,412
Assumed average capital allocation	$	4,646		$	384		$	5,030
Return on average assets⁽¹⁾	0.18		%	0.69		%	0.22		%
Return on average equity⁽¹⁾	3.87		%	14.96		%	4.71		%


(1)	Amounts used to calculate returns are based on numbers in thousands. Accordingly, recalculations based upon the disclosed amounts in millions may not produce the same results.

Table of Contents

Traditional Member Finance Segment

The increase in net income in the three and six months of 2017, compared to the same periods in 2016, was due primarily to higher spreads earned on short-term and LIBOR-indexed Advances and liquidity investments that were driven by the larger increase in rates earned on these assets relative to their associated funding. Secondarily, net income increased in the 2017 periods due to lower amortization of concession fees on Consolidated Obligations and premiums on mortgage-backed securities. These positive factors were partially offset by lower spreads on mortgage-backed securities and a decline in average Advance balances.

MPP Segment

The MPP continued to earn a substantial level of profitability compared to market interest rates, with a moderate amount of market risk and a minimal amount of credit risk. In the first six months of 2017, the MPP averaged 10 percent of total average assets while accounting for 24 percent of earnings. Net interest income increased in the three and six months of 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 primarily due to the positive impact from growth in average MPP balances and lower amortization of concession fees on Consolidated Obligations and purchased premiums on mortgage loans. The increase in net interest income was partially offset by lower spreads earned on MPP and losses on derivatives and hedging activities.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT RISK MANAGEMENT

Market Risk

Market Value of Equity and Duration of Equity - Entire Balance Sheet

Two key measures of long-term market risk exposure are the sensitivities of the market value of equity and the duration of equity to changes in interest rates and other variables, as presented in the following tables for various instantaneous and permanent interest rate shocks (in basis points). We compiled average results using data for each month end. Given the current low level of rates, the down rate shocks are nonparallel scenarios, with short-term rates decreasing less than long-term rates such that no rate falls below zero.

Market Value of Equity



(Dollars in millions)	Down 300			Down 200			Down 100			Flat Rates		Up 100			Up 200			Up 300
Average Results
2017 Year-to-Date
Market Value of Equity	$	4,620		$	4,687		$	4,885		$	4,919	$	4,843		$	4,764		$	4,705
% Change from Flat Case	(6.1		)%	(4.7		)%	(0.7		)%	—		(1.5		)%	(3.1		)%	(4.4		)%
2016 Full Year
Market Value of Equity	$	4,571		$	4,595		$	4,720		$	4,843	$	4,791		$	4,655		$	4,509
% Change from Flat Case	(5.6		)%	(5.1		)%	(2.5		)%	—		(1.1		)%	(3.9		)%	(6.9		)%
Month-End Results
June 30, 2017
Market Value of Equity	$	4,681		$	4,745		$	4,966		$	5,024	$	4,973		$	4,906		$	4,847
% Change from Flat Case	(6.8		)%	(5.6		)%	(1.2		)%	—		(1.0		)%	(2.4		)%	(3.5		)%
December 31, 2016
Market Value of Equity	$	4,587		$	4,660		$	4,803		$	4,770	$	4,654		$	4,543		$	4,457
% Change from Flat Case	(3.8		)%	(2.3		)%	0.7		%	—		(2.4		)%	(4.8		)%	(6.6		)%

Table of Contents

Duration of Equity



(In years)	Down 300		Down 200		Down 100		Flat Rates		Up 100	Up 200	Up 300
Average Results
2017 Year-to-Date	(1.9	)	(4.2	)	(3.6	)	0.6		1.8	1.3	1.2
2016 Full Year	(2.3	)	(2.8	)	(3.4	)	(0.8	)	2.3	3.1	3.3
Month-End Results
June 30, 2017	(1.8	)	(4.3	)	(4.1	)	—		1.4	1.2	1.2
December 31, 2016	(2.0	)	(3.7	)	(1.7	)	1.8		2.5	2.0	1.8

During the first six months of 2017, as in 2016, consistent with our historical practice and risk appetite, we positioned market risk exposure to changing interest rates at a moderate level and well within policy limits. The dollar amount of equity exposure for any individual rate shock can be obtained by multiplying the percentage change of the market value of equity by the amount of total capital. The durations of equity provide an estimate of the change in market value of equity for a 1.00 percentage point further change in interest rates from the rate shock level.

Based on the totality of our risk analysis, we expect that profitability, defined as the level of ROE compared with short-term market rates, will remain competitive unless interest rates change by extremely large amounts in a short period of time. Decreases in long-term interest rates even by two percentage points would still result in profitability being well above market interest rates. Similarly, we believe that profitability would not become uncompetitive in a rising rate environment unless long-term rates were to permanently increase in a short period of time by five percentage points or more, combined with short-term rates increasing by at least six percent.

Market Risk Exposure of the Mortgage Assets Portfolio

The mortgage assets portfolio normally accounts for almost all market risk exposure because of prepayment volatility that we cannot completely hedge while maintaining sufficient net spreads. Sensitivities of the market value of equity allocated to the mortgage assets portfolio under interest rate shocks (in basis points) are shown below. At June 30, 2017, the average mortgage assets portfolio had an assumed capital allocation of $1.2 billion based on the entire balance sheet's regulatory capital-to-assets ratio. Average results are compiled using data for each month-end. The market value sensitivities are one measure we use to analyze the portfolio's estimated market risk exposure.

% Change in Market Value of Equity-Mortgage Assets Portfolio



	Down 300		Down 200		Down 100		Flat Rates	Up 100		Up 200		Up 300
Average Results
2017 Year-to-Date	(36.0	)%	(28.0	)%	(5.4	)%	—	(5.4	)%	(11.0	)%	(14.7	)%
2016 Full Year	(31.7	)%	(29.4	)%	(15.5	)%	—	(3.1	)%	(15.3	)%	(29.0	)%
Month-End Results
June 30, 2017	(43.0	)%	(35.0	)%	(8.8	)%	—	(2.7	)%	(7.2	)%	(11.0	)%
December 31, 2016	(28.4	)%	(18.5	)%	0.7	%	—	(10.4	)%	(20.3	)%	(27.7	)%

The risk exposure of the mortgage assets portfolio at June 30, 2017 compared to year-end 2016 was modestly lower in rising rate scenarios and modestly higher in some lower rate scenarios driven in part by marginally lower interest-rates relative to the end of 2016 and normal changes in balance sheet composition. We believe the mortgage assets portfolio continued to have an acceptable amount of market risk exposure relative to its actual and expected profitability and is consistent with our risk appetite philosophy.

Table of Contents

Capital Adequacy

Retained Earnings

We must hold sufficient capital to protect against exposure to various risks, including market, credit, and operational. We regularly conduct a variety of measurements and assessments for capital adequacy. At June 30, 2017, our capital management policy set forth a range of $325 million to $525 million as the minimum amount of retained earnings we believe is necessary to mitigate impairment risk from market risk exposure and to provide for dividend stability from factors that could cause earnings to be volatile. At June 30, 2017, the $890 million of retained earnings was comprised of $600 million unrestricted (an increase of $26 million from year-end 2016) and $290 million restricted (an increase of $30 million from year-end 2016), which pursuant to the FHLBank System's Joint Capital Enhancement Agreement we are not permitted to distribute as dividends.

We believe that the current amount of retained earnings, which exceeds the policy range, is sufficient to mitigate members' impairment risk of their capital stock investment and to provide for dividend stabilization. We will continue to carry a greater amount of retained earnings than required by the policy and will continue to bolster capital adequacy over time by allocating a portion of earnings to the required restricted retained earnings account.

Market Capitalization Ratios

We measure two sets of market capitalization ratios. One measures the market value of equity (i.e., total capital) relative to the par value of regulatory capital stock (which is GAAP capital stock and mandatorily redeemable capital stock). The other measures the market value of total capital relative to the book value of total capital, which includes all components of capital. The measures provide a point-in-time indication of the FHLB's liquidation or franchise value and can also serve as a measure of realized or potential market risk exposure.

The following table presents the market value of equity to regulatory capital stock (excluding retained earnings) for several interest rate environments.



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Market Value of Equity to Par Value of Regulatory Capital Stock - Base Case (Flat Rates) Scenario	118	%	114	%
Market Value of Equity to Par Value of Regulatory Capital Stock - Down Shock ⁽¹⁾	117		115
Market Value of Equity to Par Value of Regulatory Capital Stock - Up Shock ⁽²⁾	115		108


(1)	Represents a down shock of 100 basis points.


(2)	Represents an up shock of 200 basis points.

A base case value below 100 percent (par) could indicate that, in the remote event of an immediate liquidation scenario involving redemption of all capital stock, capital stock may be returned to stockholders at a value below par. This could be due to experiencing risks that lower the market value of capital and/or to having an insufficient amount of retained earnings. In the first six months of 2017, the market capitalization ratios in the scenarios presented continued to be above our policy requirements. The base case ratio of 118 percent, which increased modestly at June 30, 2017 compared to the end of 2016, remains acceptable because retained earnings were 21 percent of regulatory capital stock at June 30, 2017, well above policy requirements, and because we maintained risk exposures at moderate levels.

The following table presents the market value of equity to the book value of total capital.



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Market Value of Equity to Book Value of Capital - Base Case (Flat Rates) Scenario ⁽¹⁾	98	%	95	%
Market Value of Equity to Book Value of Capital - Down Shock ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	97		96
Market Value of Equity to Book Value of Capital - Up Shock ⁽¹⁾⁽³⁾	96		91


(1)	Capital includes total capital and mandatorily redeemable capital stock.


(2)	Represents a down shock of 100 basis points.


(3)	Represents an up shock of 200 basis points.

Table of Contents

A base-case value below par indicates that we have realized or could realize risks (especially market risk) such that the market value of total capital owned by stockholders, which includes regulatory capital stock and retained earnings, is below par value (i.e., below 100 percent of the total book value). The base-case ratio of 98 percent at June 30, 2017 indicates that the market value of total capital is $122 million below the par value of total capital. In a scenario in which interest rates increase 200 basis points, the market value of total capital would be $240 million below the par value of total capital. This indicates that capital stock would still be redeemable at par value in a liquidation, but stockholders would not receive the full sum of their total ownership claims in the FHLB, which include both capital stock and retained earnings. We believe the likelihood of a liquidation scenario is extremely remote; and therefore, we accept the risk of diluting ownership claims in such a scenario.

Credit Risk

Overview

Our business entails a significant amount of inherent credit risk exposure. We believe our risk management practices, discussed below, bring the amount of residual credit risk to a minimal level. We have no loan loss reserves or impairment recorded for Credit Services, investments, and derivatives and a minimal amount of legacy credit risk exposure to the MPP.

Credit Services

Overview: We have policies and practices to manage credit risk exposure from our secured lending activities, which include Advances and Letters of Credit. The objective of our credit risk management is to equalize risk exposure across members and counterparties to a zero level of expected losses, consistent with our conservative risk management principles and desire to have virtually no residual credit risk related to member borrowings.

Collateral: We require each member to provide us a security interest in eligible collateral before it can undertake any secured borrowing. Eligible collateral includes single-family loans, multi-family loans, home equity loans and lines of credit, commercial real estate, bond securities and farm real estate. The estimated value of pledged collateral is discounted in order to offset market, credit and liquidity risks that may affect the collateral's realizable value if it must be liquidated. Over-collateralization by one member is not applied to another member. At June 30, 2017, our policy of over-collateralization resulted in total collateral pledged of $322.1 billion to serve total borrowing capacity of $276.7 billion of which $188.4 billion was unused. The collateral composition remained relatively stable compared to the end of 2016.

Borrowing Capacity/Lendable Value: We determine borrowing capacity against pledged collateral by establishing minimum levels of over-collateralization (Collateralized Maintenance Requirements or CMRs). CMRs result in a lendable value, or borrowing capacity, that is less than the amount of pledged collateral.

CMRs are determined by statistical analysis and management assumptions relating to historical price volatility, inherent credit risks, liquidation timing and costs, and the current credit and economic environment. We apply CMR results to the estimated values of pledged assets. CMRs vary among pledged assets and members based on the member institution type, the financial strength of the member institution, the form of valuation, the issuer of bond collateral or the quality of securitized assets, the marketability of the pledged assets, the payment performance of pledged loan collateral, and the quality of loan collateral as reflected in the manner in which it was underwritten and is administered. The range of lendable values applied to each major collateral type did not change in the first six months of 2017. Effective July 2017, we updated CMRs resulting in relatively minor changes in borrowing capacity for most members.

Internal Credit Ratings: We perform credit underwriting of our member and nonmember borrowers and assign them an internal credit rating. The credit ratings are based on internal credit analysis and consideration of available credit ratings from independent credit rating organizations. The credit ratings are used in conjunction with other measures of credit risk in managing secured credit risk exposure.

Member Failures, Closures, and Receiverships: There were no member failures in 2017 through the date of this filing.

MPP

Overview: We believe that the residual amount of credit risk exposure to loans in the MPP is minimal, based on the same factors described in the 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. We believe, based on our analysis, that future credit losses will not harm capital adequacy and will not significantly affect profitability except under the most extreme and unlikely credit conditions.

Table of Contents

Conventional Loan Portfolio Characteristics: The levels of loan-to-value ratios have improved over the last several years, consistent with the portfolio's excellent credit quality. The positive trends reflect the sustained recovery and improvement in the overall housing market. At June 30, 2017, the weighted average loan-to-value ratios for conventional loans based on origination values and estimated current values were 73 percent and 60 percent, respectively. These ratios were similar at December 31, 2016.

Credit Performance: The table below provides an analysis of conventional loans delinquent or in the process of foreclosure, along with the national average serious delinquency rate.



	Conventional Loan Delinquencies
(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Early stage delinquencies - unpaid principal balance ⁽¹⁾	$	44		$	47
Serious delinquencies - unpaid principal balance ⁽²⁾	$	19		$	23
Early stage delinquency rate ⁽³⁾	0.5		%	0.5		%
Serious delinquency rate⁽⁴⁾	0.2		%	0.3		%
National average serious delinquency rate ⁽⁵⁾	2.2		%	2.5		%


(1)	Includes conventional loans 30 to 89 days delinquent and not in foreclosure.


(2)	Includes conventional loans that are 90 days or more past due or where the decision of foreclosure or a similar alternative such as pursuit of deed-in-lieu has been reported.


(3)	Early stage delinquencies expressed as a percentage of the total conventional loan portfolio.


(4)	Serious delinquencies expressed as a percentage of the total conventional loan portfolio.


(5)	National average number of fixed-rate prime and subprime conventional loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure is based on the most recent national delinquency data available. The June 30, 2017 rate is based on March 31, 2017 data.

The MPP has experienced a small amount of delinquencies and foreclosures, with rates continuing to be well below national averages. This further supports our view that the overall portfolio is comprised of high-quality, well-performing loans.

Credit Enhancements: Conventional mortgage loans are supported against credit losses by various combinations of primary mortgage insurance (PMI), supplemental mortgage insurance (SMI) (for loans purchased before February 2011), and the Lender Risk Account (LRA). The LRA is a holdback of a portion of the initial purchase price to cover expected credit losses for a specific pool of loans. Starting after five years from the loan purchase date, we may return the holdback to Participating Financial Institutions (PFIs) if they manage credit risk to predefined acceptable levels of exposure on the loan pools they sell to us. As a result, some pools of loans may have sufficient credit enhancements to recapture all losses while other pools of loans may not. The LRA had balances of $193 million and $188 million at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. For more information, see Note 9 of the Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements.

Credit Losses: The following table shows the effects of credit enhancements on the estimation of credit losses at the noted periods. Estimated incurred credit losses, after credit enhancements, are accounted for in the allowance for credit losses or as a charge off (i.e., a reduction to the principal of mortgage loans held for portfolio).



(In millions)	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Estimated incurred credit losses, before credit enhancements	$	(7	)	$	(9	)
Estimated amounts deemed recoverable by:
Primary mortgage insurance	1			1
Supplemental mortgage insurance	4			5
Lender Risk Account	1			2
Estimated incurred credit losses, after credit enhancements	$	(1	)	$	(1	)

The small amount of incurred losses provides further support on the aggregate health of the portfolio. Credit risk exposure depends on the actual and potential credit performance of the loans in each pool compared to the pool's equity (on individual loans) and credit enhancements, including PMI, the LRA, and SMI.

Table of Contents

In addition to the allowance for credit losses recorded, we regularly analyze potential ranges of additional lifetime credit risk exposure for the loans in the MPP. Even under adverse scenarios for either home prices or unemployment rates, we expect that further credit losses would not significantly decrease profitability.

Investments

Liquidity Investments: We purchase liquidity investments from counterparties that have a strong ability to repay principal and interest. Liquidity investments are either unsecured, guaranteed by the U.S. government, or secured (i.e., collateralized). For unsecured liquidity investments, we invest in the debt securities of highly rated, investment-grade institutions, have appropriate and conservative limits on dollar and maturity exposure to each institution, and have strong credit underwriting practices, including active monitoring of credit quality of our counterparties and of the environment in which they operate.

The following table presents the carrying value of liquidity investments outstanding in relation to the counterparties' lowest long-term credit ratings provided by Standard & Poor's, Moody's, and/or Fitch Advisory Services. For resale agreements, the ratings shown are based on ratings of the associated collateral.



(In millions)	June 30, 2017
	Long-Term Rating
	AA		A		Total
Unsecured Liquidity Investments
Federal funds sold	$	2,500	$	4,530	$	7,030
Certificates of deposit	350		—		350
Total unsecured liquidity investments	2,850		4,530		7,380
Guaranteed/Secured Liquidity Investments
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	5,866		—		5,866
Government-sponsored enterprises ⁽¹⁾	33		—		33
Total guaranteed/secured liquidity investments	5,899		—		5,899
Total liquidity investments	$	8,749	$	4,530	$	13,279



	December 31, 2016
	Long-Term Rating
	AA		A		Total
Unsecured Liquidity Investments
Federal funds sold	$	1,280	$	2,977	$	4,257
Certificates of deposit	1,300		—		1,300
Total unsecured liquidity investments	2,580		2,977		5,557
Guaranteed/Secured Liquidity Investments
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	5,230		—		5,230
Government-sponsored enterprises ⁽¹⁾	31		—		31
Total guaranteed/secured liquidity investments	5,261		—		5,261
Total liquidity investments	$	7,841	$	2,977	$	10,818


(1)	Consists of securities that are issued and effectively guaranteed by Fannie Mae and/or Freddie Mac, which have the support of the U.S. government, although they are not obligations of the U.S. government.

During the first six months of 2017, we purchased a portion of our total liquidity investments from counterparties for which the investments are secured with collateral (secured resale agreements). We believe these investments present virtually no credit risk exposure to us.

Table of Contents

The following table presents credit ratings of our unsecured investment credit exposure by the domicile of the counterparty or the domicile of the counterparty's parent for U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks.



(In millions)	June 30, 2017
	Counterparty Rating ⁽¹⁾
Domicile of Counterparty	AA		A		Total
Domestic	$	200	$	1,090	$	1,290
U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks:
Canada	1,050		1,390		2,440
Netherlands	—		890		890
Sweden	700		—		700
France	—		550		550
Germany	400		110		510
Australia	500		—		500
Norway	—		500		500
Total U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks	2,650		3,440		6,090
Total unsecured investment credit exposure	$	2,850	$	4,530	$	7,380


(1)	Represents the lowest long-term credit rating provided by Standard & Poor's, Moody's, and/or Fitch Advisory Services.

The following table presents the remaining contractual maturity of our unsecured investment credit exposure by the domicile of the counterparty or the domicile of the counterparty's parent for U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks.



(In millions)	June 30, 2017
Domicile of Counterparty	Overnight		Due 2 days through 30 days		Due 31 days through 90 days		Total
Domestic	$	1,190	$	—	$	100	$	1,290
U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks:
Canada	2,290		150		—		2,440
Netherlands	890		—		—		890
Sweden	700		—		—		700
France	550		—		—		550
Germany	410		100		—		510
Australia	500		—		—		500
Norway	500		—		—		500
Total U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks	5,840		250		—		6,090
Total unsecured investment credit exposure	$	7,030	$	250	$	100	$	7,380

At June 30, 2017, all of the $7.4 billion of unsecured investment exposure was to counterparties with holding companies domiciled in countries receiving either AAA or AA long-term sovereign ratings. Furthermore, we restrict a significant portion of unsecured lending to overnight maturities, which further limits risk exposure to these counterparties. By Finance Agency regulation, all counterparties exposed to non-U.S. countries are required to be domestic U.S. branches of foreign counterparties. We also limit exposure to counterparties and countries that could have significant direct or indirect exposure to European sovereign debt.

Table of Contents

Mortgage-Backed Securities.

GSE Mortgage-Backed Securities

At June 30, 2017, $11.8 billion of mortgage-backed securities held were GSE securities issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which provide credit safeguards by guaranteeing either timely or ultimate payments of principal and interest. We believe that the conservatorships of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac lower the chance that they would not be able to fulfill their credit guarantees and that the securities issued by these two GSEs are effectively government guaranteed. In addition, based on the data available to us and our purchase practices, we believe that most of the mortgage loans backing our GSE mortgage-backed securities are of high quality with acceptable credit performance.

Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by Other Government Agencies

We also invest in mortgage-backed securities issued and guaranteed by Ginnie Mae and the NCUA. These investments totaled $2.8 billion at June 30, 2017. We believe that the strength of the issuers' guarantees and backing by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government is sufficient to protect us against credit losses on these securities.

Derivatives

Credit Risk Exposure: We mitigate most of the credit risk exposure resulting from derivative transactions through collateralization or use of daily settled contracts. The table below presents the credit ratings for derivative positions to which we had credit risk exposure at June 30, 2017.



(In millions)
	Total Notional		Net Derivatives Fair Value Before Collateral and Variation Margin for Daily Settled Contracts			Cash Collateral Pledged to (from) Counterparties and Variation Margin for Daily Settled Contracts ⁽¹⁾		Net Credit Exposure to Counterparties
Non-member counterparties:
Asset positions with credit exposure:
Uncleared derivatives:
A	$	57	$	—		$	—	$	—
Total uncleared derivatives	57		—			—		—
Cleared derivatives ⁽²⁾	4,168		28			16		44
Liability positions with credit exposure:
Uncleared derivatives:
Aa/AA	1,384		(2		)	2		—
Total uncleared derivatives	1,384		(2		)	2		—
Cleared derivatives ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	6,492		(57		)	91		34
Total derivative positions with credit exposure to non-member counterparties	12,101		(31		)	109		78
Member institutions ⁽³⁾	90		—			—		—
Total	$	12,191	$	(31	)	$	109	$	78


(1)	Cleared derivatives include variation margin for daily settled contracts of $55 million at June 30, 2017.

(2)

Represents derivative transactions cleared with LCH.Clearnet LLC and CME Clearing, the FHLB's clearinghouses, which are not rated. LCH.Clearnet LLC's parent company, LCH Group Holdings Ltd, was rated A+ by Standard & Poor's; however, on May 31, 2017, Standard & Poor's lowered the rating to A and withdrew the rating at LCH Group Holdings Ltd.'s request. LCH Group Holdings Ltd.'s ultimate parent, London Stock Exchange Group Plc is rated Baa1 by Moody's and A- by Standard & Poor's. CME Clearing's parent, CME Group Inc. is rated Aa3 by Moody's and AA- by Standard & Poor's.


(3)	Represents Mandatory Delivery Contracts.

Table of Contents

Our exposure to cleared derivatives is primarily associated with our requirement to post initial margin through the clearing agent to the Derivatives Clearing Organizations. The amount of cash collateral pledged as initial margin has increased from our use of cleared derivatives. However, the use of cleared derivatives mitigates credit risk exposure because a central counterparty is substituted for individual counterparties.

Based on both the gross and net exposures, we had less than $1 million of residual credit risk exposure on uncleared derivatives at June 30, 2017. Gross exposure could change if the composition of our derivatives change. However, contractual collateral provisions in these derivatives would limit net exposure to acceptable levels.

Although we cannot predict if we will realize credit risk losses from any of our derivatives counterparties, we believe that all of the counterparties will be able to continue making timely interest payments and, more generally, to continue to satisfy the terms and conditions of their derivative contracts with us. As of June 30, 2017, we had $30 million of notional principal of interest rate swaps with one member, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., which also had outstanding credit services with us. Due to the amount of market value collateralization, we had no outstanding credit exposure to this counterparty related to interest rate swaps outstanding.

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity Overview

The FHLBank System's primary source of funds is the sale of Consolidated Obligations in the capital markets. Our ability to obtain funds through the sale of Consolidated Obligations at acceptable interest costs depends on the financial market's perceived riskiness of the Obligations and on prevailing conditions in the capital markets, particularly the short-term capital markets. The System's favorable debt ratings, the implicit U.S. government backing of our debt, and our effective risk management practices are instrumental in ensuring satisfactory access to the capital markets.

We believe our liquidity position, as well as that of the System, remained strong during the first six months of 2017. Our overall ability to effectively fund our operations through debt issuances remained sufficient. Investor demand for System debt remained robust in the first six months of 2017. Although we can make no assurances, we expect this to continue to be the case. We believe the possibility of a liquidity or funding crisis in the System that would impair our ability to participate, on a cost-effective basis, in issuances of new debt, service outstanding debt, maintain adequate capitalization, or pay competitive dividends is remote. See the "Consolidated Obligations" section of "Analysis of Financial Condition" for further information about our funding actions in the first six months of 2017 aimed at lowering exposure to unforeseen liquidity risks.

The System works collectively to manage and monitor the system-wide liquidity, funding, and refinancing risks. The System has a large reliance on short-term funding; therefore, it has a sharp focus on managing liquidity risk to very low levels. As shown on the Statements of Cash Flows, in the first six months of 2017, our portion of the System's debt issuances totaled $293.5 billion for Discount Notes and $13.7 billion for Bonds. See the Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements for more detailed information regarding contractual maturities of certain financial assets and liabilities which are instrumental in determining the amount of liquidity risk.

A primary way that we manage liquidity risk is to meet operational and contingency liquidity requirements. We satisfied the operational liquidity requirement by both meeting a contingency liquidity requirement, discussed below, and because we were able to adequately access the capital markets to issue debt. Liquidity investments, most of which were overnight, were generally in the range of $5 billion to $15 billion during the first six months of 2017. In addition, Finance Agency guidance requires us to target at least 5 to 15 consecutive days of a positive amount of liquidity based on specific assumptions under two scenarios. We target holding at least three extra days of positive liquidity under each scenario, although as market conditions warrant we may hold, and often do hold, additional amounts.

Table of Contents

Contingency Liquidity Requirement

Contingency liquidity risk is the potential inability to meet liquidity needs because our access to the capital markets to issue Consolidated Obligations is restricted or suspended for a period of time due to a market disruption, operational failure, or real or perceived credit quality problems. We continued to hold an ample amount of liquidity reserves to protect against contingency liquidity risk.



(In millions)	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Contingency Liquidity Requirement
Total Contingency Liquidity Reserves ⁽¹⁾	$	34,402		$	32,127
Total Requirement ⁽²⁾	(21,517		)	(24,224		)
Excess Contingency Liquidity Available	$	12,885		$	7,903


(1)	Includes, among others, cash, overnight Federal funds, overnight deposits, self-liquidating term Federal funds, 95 percent of the market value of available-for-sale negotiable securities, and 75 percent of the market value of certain held-to-maturity obligations, including obligations of the United States, U.S. government agency obligations and mortgage-backed securities.


(2)	Includes net liabilities maturing in the next seven business days, assets traded not yet settled, Advance commitments outstanding, Advances maturing in the next seven business days, and a three percent hypothetical increase in Advances.

Deposit Reserve Requirement

To support our member deposits, we also must meet a statutory deposit reserve requirement. The sum of our investments in obligations of the United States, deposits in eligible banks or trust companies, and Advances with a final maturity not exceeding five years must equal or exceed the current amount of member deposits. The following table presents the components of this liquidity requirement.



(In millions)	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Deposit Reserve Requirement
Total Eligible Deposit Reserves	$	78,160		$	72,114
Total Member Deposits	(712		)	(765		)
Excess Deposit Reserves	$	77,448		$	71,349

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at June 30, 2017. We believe that, as in the past, we will continue to have sufficient liquidity, including from access to the debt markets to issue Consolidated Obligations, to satisfy these obligations on a timely basis.



(In millions)	< 1 year		1 < 3 years		3 < 5 years		> 5 years		Total
Contractual Obligations
Long-term debt (Bonds) - par ⁽¹⁾	$	24,708	$	13,833	$	8,386	$	6,398	$	53,325
Operating leases (include premises and equipment)	1		2		1		4		8
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock	22		3		10		1		36
Commitments to fund mortgage loans	264		—		—		—		264
Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations	2		5		4		27		38
Total Contractual Obligations	$	24,997	$	13,843	$	8,401	$	6,430	$	53,671


(1)	Does not include Discount Notes and contractual interest payments related to Bonds. Total is based on contractual maturities; the actual timing of payments could be affected by factors affecting redemptions.

Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The following table summarizes our off-balance sheet items at June 30, 2017. For more information, see Note 19 of the Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements.



(In millions)	< 1 year		1 < 3 years		3 < 5 years		> 5 years		Total
Off-balance sheet items ⁽¹⁾
Standby Letters of Credit	$	16,995	$	79	$	69	$	32	$	17,175
Standby bond purchase agreements	38		60		—		—		98
Consolidated Obligations traded, not yet settled	43		—		—		—		43
Total off-balance sheet items	$	17,076	$	139	$	69	$	32	$	17,316


(1)	Represents notional amount of off-balance sheet obligations.

Member Concentration Risk

We regularly assess concentration risks from business activity. We believe that the current concentration of Advance activity is consistent with our risk management philosophy, and the impact of borrower concentration on market risk, credit risk, and operational risk, after considering mitigating controls, is small.

Operational Risks

There were no material developments regarding our operational risk exposure during the first six months of 2017.


Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Information required by this Item is set forth under the caption “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Risk Management” in Part I, Item 2, of this Report.


Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.

DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of June 30, 2017, the FHLB's management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon that evaluation, these two officers each concluded that, as of June 30, 2017, the FHLB maintained effective disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files under the Exchange Act is (1) accumulated and communicated to management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure and (2) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

As of June 30, 2017, the FHLB's management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the FHLB's internal control over financial reporting. Based upon that evaluation, these two officers each concluded that there were no changes in the FHLB's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2017 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the FHLB's internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1A.	Risk Factors.

For a discussion of our risk factors, see Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have been no material changes from the risk factors in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

From time to time the FHLB provides Letters of Credit in the ordinary course of business to support members' obligations issued in support of unaffiliated, third-party offerings of notes, bonds or other securities. The FHLB provided $10.0 million of such credit support during the three months ended June 30, 2017. To the extent that these Letters of Credit are securities for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, their issuance is exempt from registration pursuant to Section 3(a)(2) thereof.


Item 5.	Other Information.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) serves as the independent registered public accounting firm for the FHLB. Rule 201(c)(1)(ii)(A) of SEC Regulation S-X (the Loan Rule) prohibits an accounting firm, such as PwC, from having certain financial relationships with its audit clients and affiliated entities. Specifically, the Loan Rule provides, in relevant part, that an accounting firm generally would not be independent if it or a covered person in the firm receives a loan from a lender that is a “record or beneficial owner of more than ten percent of the audit client’s equity securities.” A covered person in the firm includes personnel on the audit engagement team, personnel in the chain of command, partners and managers who provide ten or more hours of non-audit services to the audit client, and partners in the office where the lead engagement partner practices in connection with the client.

PwC has advised the FHLB that for the period ended June 30, 2017, PwC and certain covered persons had borrowing relationships with two FHLB members (referred below as the “lenders”) who own more than ten percent of the FHLB’s capital stock, which under the Loan Rule, may reasonably be thought to bear on PwC’s independence with respect to the FHLB. The FHLB is providing this disclosure to explain the facts and circumstances, as well as PwC’s and the Audit Committee’s conclusions, concerning PwC’s objectivity and impartiality with respect to the audit of the FHLB.

PwC advised the Audit Committee of the Board that it believes that, in light of the facts of these borrowing relationships, its ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment on all matters encompassed within PwC’s audit engagement has not been impaired and that a reasonable investor with knowledge of all relevant facts and circumstances would reach the same conclusion. PwC has advised the Audit Committee that this conclusion is based in part on the following considerations:


▪	the firm's borrowings are in good standing and neither lender has the right to take action against PwC, as borrower, in connection with the financings;


▪	the debt balances outstanding are immaterial to PwC and to each lender;


▪	PwC has borrowing relationships with a diverse group of lenders, therefore PwC is not dependent on any single lender or group of lenders; and


▪	the PwC audit engagement team has no involvement in PwC’s treasury function and PwC’s treasury function has no oversight or ability to influence the PwC audit engagement team.

Additionally, the Audit Committee assessed PwC’s ability to perform an objective and impartial audit, including consideration of the ownership structure of the FHLB, the limited voting rights of members and the composition of the Board of Directors. In addition to the above listed considerations, the Audit Committee considered the following:


▪	although the lenders owned more than ten percent of the FHLB’s capital stock, the lenders' voting rights are each less than ten percent;


▪	no individual officer or director that serves on the Board of Directors has the ability to significantly influence the FHLB based on the composition of the Board of Directors; and

Table of Contents


▪	as of June 30, 2017, and as of the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q, no officer or director of either lender served on the Board of Directors of the FHLB.

Based on this evaluation, the Audit Committee has concluded that PwC’s ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment on all issues encompassed within PwC’s audit engagement has not been impaired.


Item 6.	Exhibits.


(a)	Exhibits.

See Index of Exhibits

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, as of the 10th day of August 2017.

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CINCINNATI

(Registrant)



By:	/s/ Andrew S. Howell
	Andrew S. Howell
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	(principal executive officer)

By:	/s/ Donald R. Able
	Donald R. Able
	Executive Vice President - Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
	(principal financial officer)

Table of Contents

INDEX OF EXHIBITS



Exhibit Number ⁽¹⁾	Description of exhibit	Document filed or furnished, as indicated below

31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer	Filed Herewith

31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer	Filed Herewith

32	Section 1350 Certifications	Furnished Herewith

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document	Filed Herewith

101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document	Filed Herewith

101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document	Filed Herewith

101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document	Filed Herewith

101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document	Filed Herewith

101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document	Filed Herewith


(1)	Numbers coincide with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati - FORM 10-Q - August 10, 2017

Attached files

Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati Reports