BRUKER CORP - FORM 10-Q - August 9, 2017

Attached files

file	filename
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - BRUKER CORP	a17-13351_1ex32d1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - BRUKER CORP	a17-13351_1ex31d2.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - BRUKER CORP	a17-13351_1ex31d1.htm

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT of 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT of 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 000-30833

BRUKER CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		04-3110160
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

40 Manning Road, Billerica, MA 01821

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (978) 663-3660

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer x		Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o
Emerging growth company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class		Outstanding at August 4, 2017
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share		158,352,316 shares

Table of Contents

BRUKER CORPORATION

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2017

Index

		Page
Part I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3
Item 1:	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	3
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016	3
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016	4
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016	5
	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2:	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	26
Item 3:	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	42
Item 4:	Controls and Procedures	43
Part II	OTHER INFORMATION	44
Item 1:	Legal Proceedings	44
Item 1A:	Risk Factors	45
Item 2:	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	45
Item 3:	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	45
Item 4:	Mine Safety Disclosure	46
Item 5:	Other Information	46
Item 6:	Exhibits	46
	Signatures	47

Table of Contents

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

BRUKER CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in millions, except share and per share data)

	June 30,			December 31,
	2017			2016
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	217.7		$	342.4
Short-term investments	222.6			157.9
Accounts receivable, net	240.4			243.9
Inventories	505.1			440.4
Other current assets	113.8			91.3
Total current assets	1,299.6			1,275.9

Property, plant and equipment, net	252.8			239.1
Goodwill	165.4			130.6
Intangibles, net and other long-term assets	195.1			162.8
Total assets	$	1,912.9		$	1,808.4

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	0.1		$	20.1
Accounts payable	91.7			86.1
Customer advances	136.4			149.0
Other current liabilities	265.4			269.5
Total current liabilities	493.6			524.7

Long-term debt	430.7			391.6
Other long-term liabilities	225.5			199.0

Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)

Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding	—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value 260,000,000 shares authorized, 171,158,642 and 170,552,890 shares issued and 158,858,855 and 159,854,695 shares outstanding at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively	1.7			1.7
Treasury stock, at cost, 12,299,787 and 10,698,195 shares at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively	(293.3		)	(249.3		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(13.0		)	(75.9		)
Other shareholders’ equity	1,060.3			1,009.9
Total shareholders’ equity attributable to Bruker Corporation	755.7			686.4
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries	7.4			6.7
Total shareholders’ equity	763.1			693.1

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,912.9		$	1,808.4

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

BRUKER CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(in millions, except per share data)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Product revenue	$	345.9		$	305.6		$	664.8		$	617.9
Service revenue	67.1			63.5			130.4			124.2
Other revenue	1.9			2.6			4.6			5.0
Total revenue	414.9			371.7			799.8			747.1

Cost of product revenue	192.6			162.3			365.3			332.5
Cost of service revenue	38.7			38.0			74.4			75.4
Cost of other revenue	0.2			1.3			0.3			2.3
Total cost of revenue	231.5			201.6			440.0			410.2
Gross profit	183.4			170.1			359.8			336.9

Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative	102.8			100.9			200.9			193.6
Research and development	40.7			36.8			78.3			72.9
Other charges, net	6.4			12.0			9.5			16.0
Total operating expenses	149.9			149.7			288.7			282.5
Operating income	33.5			20.4			71.1			54.4

Interest and other expense, net	(3.3		)	(2.6		)	(9.3		)	(8.2		)
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries	30.2			17.8			61.8			46.2
Income tax provision	6.2			3.0			16.1			7.8
Consolidated net income	24.0			14.8			45.7			38.4
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries	0.6			0.3			0.7			0.3
Net income attributable to Bruker Corporation	$	23.4		$	14.5		$	45.0		$	38.1

Net income per common share attributable to Bruker Corporation shareholders:
Basic	$	0.15		$	0.09		$	0.28		$	0.23
Diluted	$	0.15		$	0.09		$	0.28		$	0.23

Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic	159.5			161.4			159.6			162.3
Diluted	160.4			162.4			160.4			163.3

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	71.6		$	(2.2	)	$	109.1		$	54.0
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests	1.0			0.1			1.2			0.3
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Bruker Corporation	$	70.6		$	(2.3	)	$	107.9		$	53.7

Dividend declared	$	0.04		$	0.04		$	0.08		$	0.08

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

BRUKER CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in millions)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Consolidated net income	$	45.7		$	38.4
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	31.1			26.7
Stock-based compensation expense	5.3			4.3
Deferred income taxes	(2.2		)	(4.0		)
Other non-cash expenses, net	1.8			17.5
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and divestitures:
Accounts receivable	16.9			30.3
Inventories	(36.6		)	(60.0		)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	(24.4		)	(12.3		)
Income taxes payable, net	(7.6		)	(31.4		)
Deferred revenue	3.3			5.4
Customer advances	(20.6		)	(6.4		)
Other changes in operating assets and liabilities, net	2.7			(4.4		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	15.4			4.1

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of short-term investments	(118.5		)	(33.1		)
Maturities of short-term investments	69.4			50.1
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired	(58.7		)	(1.2		)
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	(21.1		)	(17.2		)
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment	6.9			0.9
Net cash used in investing activities	(122.0		)	(0.5		)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayments of the Note Purchase Agreement	(20.0		)	—
Repayments of revolving lines of credit	(40.0		)	—
Proceeds from revolving lines of credit	79.0			77.0
Proceeds (repayment) of other debt, net	(0.3		)	0.2
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net	9.2			9.6
Payment of contingent consideration	(3.5		)	—
Repurchase of common stock	(41.7		)	(117.6		)
Excess tax benefit related to stock option awards	—			0.3
Payment of dividends	(12.8		)	(13.0		)
Cash payments to noncontrolling interest	(0.5		)	—
Net cash used in financing activities	(30.6		)	(43.5		)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	12.7			4.8
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	(124.5		)	(35.1		)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period	345.9			271.2
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period	$	221.4		$	236.1

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

BRUKER CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Description of Business

Bruker Corporation, together with its consolidated subsidiaries (“Bruker” or the “Company”), develops, manufactures and distributes high-performance scientific instruments and analytical and diagnostic solutions that enable its customers to explore life and materials at microscopic, molecular and cellular levels. Many of the Company’s products are used to detect, measure and visualize structural characteristics of chemical, biological and industrial material samples. The Company’s products address the rapidly evolving needs of a diverse array of customers in life science research, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, applied markets, cell biology, clinical research, microbiology, in-vitro diagnostics, nanotechnology and materials science research.

The Company has two reportable segments, Bruker Scientific Instruments (BSI), which represented approximately 87% and 89% of the Company’s revenues during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, and 93% of the Company’s revenues during each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2016; and Bruker Energy & Supercon Technologies (BEST), which represented the remainder of the Company’s revenues. Within BSI, the Company is organized into three operating segments: the Bruker BioSpin Group, the Bruker CALID Group and the Bruker Nano Group. For financial reporting purposes, the Bruker BioSpin, Bruker CALID and Bruker Nano operating segments are aggregated into the BSI reportable segment because each has similar economic characteristics, production processes, service offerings, types and classes of customers, methods of distribution and regulatory environments.

Bruker BioSpin — The Bruker BioSpin Group designs, manufactures and distributes enabling life science tools based on magnetic resonance technology. The majority of the Bruker BioSpin Group’s revenues are generated by academic and government research customers. Other customers include pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and nonprofit laboratories, as well as chemical, food and beverage, clinical and other industrial companies.

Bruker CALID (Chemicals, Applied Markets, Life Science, In-Vitro Diagnostics, Detection) — The Bruker CALID Group designs, manufactures and distributes life science mass spectrometry and ion mobility spectrometry systems, infrared spectroscopy and radiological/nuclear detectors for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear and Explosive (CBRNE) detection and analytical and process analysis instruments and solutions based on infrared and Raman molecular spectroscopy technologies. Customers of the Bruker CALID Group include: academic institutions and medical schools; pharmaceutical, biotechnology and diagnostics companies; contract research organizations; nonprofit or for-profit forensics laboratories; agriculture, food and beverage safety laboratories; environmental and clinical microbiology laboratories; hospitals and government departments and agencies.

Bruker Nano — The Bruker Nano Group designs, manufactures and distributes advanced X-ray instruments; atomic force microscopy instrumentation; advanced fluorescence optical microscopy instruments; analytical tools for electron microscopes and X-ray metrology; defect-detection equipment for semiconductor process control; handheld, portable and mobile X-ray fluorescence spectrometry instruments; and spark optical emission spectroscopy systems. Customers of the Bruker Nano Group include academic institutions, governmental customers, nanotechnology companies, semiconductor companies, raw material manufacturers, industrial companies, biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies and other businesses involved in materials analysis.

The Company’s BEST reportable segment develops and manufactures superconducting and non-superconducting materials and devices for use in renewable energy, energy infrastructure, healthcare and “big science” research. The segment focuses on metallic low temperature superconductors for use in magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear magnetic resonance, fusion energy research and other applications, as well as ceramic high temperature superconductors primarily for energy grid and magnet applications.

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements represent the consolidated accounts of the Company. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission

Table of Contents

(SEC) for Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the financial information presented herein does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair statement have been included. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for any other interim period or the full year.

At June 30, 2017, the Company’s significant accounting policies and estimates, which are detailed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, have not changed other than the Company no longer considers changes in employee benefit plan assumptions to be a critical accounting policy.

In November 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows, Restricted Cash, requiring restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this standard during the first quarter of 2017. Restricted cash is now included as a component of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statement of cash flows. The Company has certain subsidiaries which are required by local governance to maintain restricted cash balances to cover future employee benefit payments. Restricted cash balances are classified as non-current unless, under the terms of the applicable agreements, the funds will be released from restrictions within one year from the balance sheet date. The current and non-current portion of restricted cash is recorded within other current assets and other long-term assets, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

The inclusion of restricted cash increased the balances of the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of cash flows as follows:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016
Beginning Balance	$	3.5	$	4.1
Ending Balance	3.7		3.5

2. Acquisitions

On May 5, 2017, the Company acquired 100% of the shares of Luxendo GmbH (“Luxendo”), a privately held spin-off of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), for a purchase price of Euro 17 million (approximately $18.8 million), with the potential for additional consideration based on revenue achievements in 2018 through 2021. Luxendo is a developer and manufacturer of proprietary light-sheet fluorescence microscopy instruments and the Company believes the acquisition enhances the Company’s portfolio of swept-field confocal, super-resolution, and multiphoton fluorescence microscope product lines for small organism embryology, live-cell imaging, brain development and cleared brain tissue and optogenetics applications. Luxendo is located in Heidelberg, Germany and is being integrated into the Bruker Nano Group within the BSI reportable segment. The acquisition of Luxendo was accounted for under the acquisition method. The components and fair value allocation of the consideration transferred in connection with the acquisition were as follows (in millions):

Table of Contents

Consideration Transferred:
Cash paid	$	20.1
Cash acquired	(1.3		)
Contingent consideration	3.1
Total consideration transferred	$	21.9

Allocation of Consideration Transferred:
Inventories	1.1
Other current and non-current assets	0.4
Property, plant and equipment	0.3
Intangible assets:
Existing technology	10.9
Trade name	0.8
Goodwill	11.2
Deferred taxes, net	(2.4		)
Liabilities assumed	(0.4		)
Total consideration transferred	$	21.9

The preliminary fair value allocation included contingent consideration in the amount of $3.1 million, which represented the estimated fair value of future payments to the former shareholders of Luxendo based on achieving annual revenue targets for the years 2018 through 2021. The Company expects to complete the fair value allocation in the third quarter of 2017. The amortization period for intangible assets acquired in connection with the acquisition of Luxendo is 10 years for trade names and 7 years for technology.

The results of Luxendo, including the amount allocated to goodwill that is attributable to expected synergies and not expected to be deductible for tax purposes, have been included in the BSI Segment from the date of acquisition. Pro forma financial information reflecting the acquisition of Luxendo has not been presented because the impact on revenues, net income and total assets is not material.

On January 23, 2017, the Company acquired 100% of the shares of Hysitron, Incorporated (Hysitron). The acquisition adds Hysitron’s nanomechanical testing instruments to the Company’s existing portfolio of atomic force microscopes, surface profilometers, and tribology and mechanical testing systems. Hysitron is included in the Bruker Nano Group within the BSI reportable segment. The acquisition of Hysitron was accounted for under the acquisition method. The components and fair value allocation of the consideration transferred in connection with the acquisition of Hysitron were as follows (in millions):

Table of Contents

Consideration Transferred:
Cash paid	$	27.9
Cash acquired	(0.7		)
Contingent consideration	1.6
Total consideration transferred	$	28.8

Allocation of Consideration Transferred:
Accounts receivable, net	$	3.0
Inventories	3.8
Other current assets	0.2
Property, plant and equipment	0.6
Intangible assets:
Customer relationships	5.8
Existing technology	4.7
Trade name	1.2
Other	0.6
Goodwill	16.6
Deferred taxes, net	(4.1		)
Capital Lease	(0.2		)
Liabilities assumed	(3.4		)
Total consideration transferred	$	28.8

The fair value allocation included contingent consideration in the amount of $1.6 million, which represented the estimated fair value of future payments to the former shareholders of Hysitron based on achieving annual revenue targets for the years 2017 through 2018. The maximum potential future payments related to the contingent consideration is $10 million. The amortization period for intangible assets acquired in connection with Hysitron is 7 years for customer relationships, trademarks and other intangibles and 5 years for existing technology.

The results of Hysitron, including the amount allocated to goodwill that is attributable to expected synergies and not expected to be deductible for tax purposes, have been included in the BSI Segment from the date of acquisition. Pro forma financial information reflecting the acquisition of Hysitron has not been presented because the impact on revenues, net income and total assets is not material.

In addition to the acquisitions noted above, in the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company completed various other acquisitions that collectively complemented the Company’s existing product offerings and added aftermarket and software capabilities to the Company’s existing microbiology business. The impact of these acquisitions, individually and collectively, on revenues, net income and total assets was not material.

3. Stock-Based Compensation

On May 14, 2010, the Bruker Corporation 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2010 Plan”) was approved by the Company’s stockholders. The 2010 Plan provided for the issuance of up to 8,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The 2010 Plan allowed a committee of the Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) to grant incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options and restricted stock awards. The Compensation Committee had the authority to determine which employees would receive the awards, the amount of the awards and other terms and conditions of any awards. Awards granted under the 2010 Plan typically were made subject to a vesting period of three to five years.

On May 20, 2016, the Bruker Corporation 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2016 Plan”) was approved by the Company’s stockholders. With the approval of the 2016 Plan, no further grants will be made under the 2010 Plan. The 2016 Plan provides for the issuance of up to 9,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and permits the grant of awards of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, unrestricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and performance units, as well as cash-based awards. The 2016 Plan is administered by the

Table of Contents

Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee has the authority to determine which employees will receive awards, the amount of any awards, and other terms and conditions of such awards. Awards granted under the 2016 Plan typically vest over a period of one to four years.

The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense as follows in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss) (in millions):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Stock options	$	1.7	$	1.7	$	3.4	$	3.5
Restricted stock awards	0.4		0.4		0.7		0.8
Restricted stock units	0.6		—		1.2		—
Total stock-based compensation	$	2.7	$	2.1	$	5.3	$	4.3

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Costs of product revenue	$	0.4	$	0.3	$	0.8	$	0.6
Selling, general and administrative	1.9		1.5		3.7		3.1
Research and development	0.4		0.3		0.8		0.6
Total stock-based compensation	$	2.7	$	2.1	$	5.3	$	4.3

Stock-based compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the underlying requisite service period of the stock-based award.

Stock options to purchase the Company’s common stock are periodically awarded to executive officers and other employees of the Company subject to a vesting period of three to four years. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Assumptions for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 regarding volatility, expected life, dividend yield and risk-free interest rates are required for the Black-Scholes model and are presented in the table below:

	2017	2016
Risk-free interest rates	1.78% - 2.09%	1.27% - 2.05%
Expected life	5.56 years	5.75 - 7.02 years
Volatility	31.41% - 34.13%	33.75% - 41.60%
Expected dividend yield	0.58% - 0.74%	0% - 0.66%

Stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was as follows:

Table of Contents

	Shares Subject to Options		Weighted Average Option Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Yrs)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in millions) (b)
Outstanding at December 31, 2016	4,625,678		$	18.73
Granted	21,181		24.04
Exercised	(597,943	)	15.48
Forfeited	(128,260	)	19.53
Outstanding at June 30, 2017	3,920,656		$	19.23	6.4	$	37.7

Exercisable at June 30, 2017	1,843,186		$	16.74	4.9	$	22.3

Exercisable and expected to vest at June 30, 2017 (a)	3,781,258		$	19.15	6.4	$	36.7

(a) In addition to the options that are vested at June 30, 2017, the Company expects a portion of the unvested options to vest in the future. Options expected to vest in the future are determined by applying an estimated forfeiture rate to the options that are unvested as of June 30, 2017.

(b) The aggregate intrinsic value is based on the positive difference between the fair value of the Company’s common stock price of $28.84 on June 30, 2017 and the exercise price of the underlying stock options.

The weighted average fair value of options granted was $7.57 and $9.77 per share for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $6.7 million and $9.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Restricted stock award activity for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was as follows:

	Shares Subject to Restriction		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2016	172,506		$	19.37
Vested	(11,584	)	19.87
Forfeited	(4,053	)	22.46
Outstanding at June 30, 2017	156,869		$	19.25

The total fair value of restricted stock vested was $0.2 million in each of the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

Restricted stock unit activity for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was as follows:

	Shares Subject to Restriction		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2016	262,317		$	22.32
Granted	59,679		22.34
Vested	(8,526	)	22.71
Forfeited	(17,293	)	22.47
Outstanding at June 30, 2017	296,177		$	22.31

Table of Contents

The total fair value of restricted stock units vested was $0.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2017, with no corresponding amount in the comparable period in 2016.

At June 30, 2017, the Company expects to recognize pre-tax stock-based compensation expense of $10.7 million associated with outstanding stock option awards granted under the Company’s stock plans over the weighted average remaining service period of 2.32 years. The Company expects to recognize additional pre-tax stock-based compensation expense of $1.7 million associated with outstanding restricted stock awards granted under the Company’s stock plans over the weighted average remaining service period of 1.79 years. The Company also expects to recognize additional pre-tax stock-based compensation expense of $4.8 million associated with outstanding restricted stock units granted under the 2016 Plan over the weighted average remaining service period of 3.04 years.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Stock Compensation - Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The new standard simplifies accounting for share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences and the classification of the tax impact on the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted this standard effective January 1, 2017. The ASU requires that the difference between the actual tax benefit realized upon exercise or vesting, as applicable, and the tax benefit recorded based on the fair value of the stock award at the time of grant (the “excess tax benefits”) be reflected as a reduction of the current period provision for income taxes with any shortfall recorded as an increase in the tax provision rather than as a component of changes to additional paid-in capital. The ASU also requires the excess tax benefit realized be reflected as an operating cash flow rather than a financing cash flow. This standard was adopted by the Company on a modified retrospective basis, which resulted in a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings of $3.6 million related to the timing of when excess tax benefits are recognized. The actual benefit realized in future periods is inherently uncertain and will vary based on the timing and relative value realized for future share-based transactions. The Company continues to utilize a historical forfeiture rate to estimate future forfeitures.

4. Earnings Per Share

Net income per common share attributable to Bruker Corporation shareholders is calculated by dividing net income attributable to Bruker Corporation by the weighted-average shares outstanding during the period. The diluted net income per share computation includes the effect of shares which would be issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options and the vesting of restricted stock, reduced by the number of shares which are assumed to be purchased by the Company under the treasury stock method.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding and net income per common share attributable to Bruker Corporation shareholders (in millions, except per share amounts):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Net income attributable to Bruker Corporation, as reported	$	23.4	$	14.5	$	45.0	$	38.1

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic	159.5		161.4		159.6		162.3
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options and restricted stock	0.9		1.0		0.8		1.0
	160.4		162.4		160.4		163.3

Net income per common share attributable to Bruker Corporation shareholders:
Basic	$	0.15	$	0.09	$	0.28	$	0.23
Diluted	$	0.15	$	0.09	$	0.28	$	0.23

Stock options to purchase approximately 1.2 million shares and 1.0 million shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share in the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. Approximately 1.4 million shares and 1.8 million shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share in the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

Table of Contents

5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company applies the following hierarchy to determine the fair value of financial instruments, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement. The levels in the hierarchy are defined as follows:

· Level 1: Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

· Level 2: Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

· Level 3: Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

The valuation techniques that may be used by the Company to determine the fair value of Level 2 and Level 3 financial instruments are the market approach, the income approach and the cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present value based on current market expectations about those future amounts, including present value techniques, option-pricing models and the excess earnings method. The cost approach is based on the amount that would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost).

The following tables set forth the Company’s financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and presents them within the fair value hierarchy using the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in millions):

Table of Contents

June 30, 2017	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets Available (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts	$	0.8	$	—	$	0.8	$	—
Foreign exchange contracts	5.7		—		5.7		$	—
Fixed price commodity contracts	0.4		—		0.4		—
Total assets recorded at fair value	$	6.9	$	—	$	6.9	$	—

Liabilities:
Contingent consideration	$	12.5	$	—	$	—	$	12.5
Foreign exchange contracts	0.1		—		0.1		—
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts	0.8		—		0.8		—
Total liabilities recorded at fair value	$	13.4	$	—	$	0.9	$	12.5

December 31, 2016	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets Available (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts	$	4.0	$	—	$	4.0	$	—
Fixed price commodity contracts	0.2		—		0.2		—
Total assets recorded at fair value	$	4.2	$	—	$	4.2	$	—

Liabilities:
Contingent consideration	$	16.6	$	—	$	—	$	16.6
Foreign exchange contracts	1.4		—		1.4		—
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts	0.3		—		0.3		—
Total liabilities recorded at fair value	$	18.3	$	—	$	1.7	$	16.6

The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash equivalents, short-term investments, restricted cash, derivative instruments consisting of forward foreign exchange contracts, commodity contracts, derivatives embedded in certain purchase and sale contracts, accounts receivable, borrowings under a revolving credit agreement, accounts payable, contingent consideration and long-term debt. The carrying amounts of the Company’s cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash, accounts receivable, borrowings under a revolving credit agreement and accounts payable approximate fair value because of their short-term nature. Derivative assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company’s long-term debt consists principally of a private placement arrangement entered into in 2012 with various fixed interest rates based on the maturity date. The fair value of the long-term fixed interest rate debt, which has been classified as Level 2, was $233.5 million and $253.3 million at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, based on the outstanding amount at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, market and observable sources with similar maturity dates.

The Company measures certain assets and liabilities at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. Fair value treatment may be elected either upon initial recognition of an eligible asset or liability or, for an existing asset or liability, if an event triggers a new basis of accounting. The Company did not elect to remeasure any of its existing financial assets or liabilities and did not elect the fair value option for any financial assets or liabilities which originated during the three or six months ended June 30, 2017 or 2016.

Table of Contents

Excluded from the table above are cash equivalents, restricted cash and short-term investments. The Company has a program to enter into time deposits with varying maturity dates ranging from one to twelve months, as well as call deposits for which the Company has the ability to redeem the invested amounts over a period of 95 days. The Company has classified these investments within cash and cash equivalents or short-term investments within the consolidated balance sheets based on call and maturity dates and these are not subject to fair value measurement. There are no cash equivalents, $3.7 million and $3.5 million of restricted cash and $222.6 million and $157.9 million of short-term investments outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

As part of certain acquisitions in 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Company recorded contingent consideration liabilities that have been classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The contingent consideration represents the estimated fair value of future payments to the former shareholders of applicable acquired companies based on achieving annual revenue and gross margin targets in certain years as specified in the purchase and sale agreements. The Company initially values the contingent considerations by using a Monte Carlo simulation or an income approach method. The Monte Carlo method models future revenue and costs of goods sold projections and discounts the average results to present value. The income approach method involves calculating the earnout payment based on the forecasted cash flows, adjusting the future earnout payment for the risk of reaching the projected financials, and then discounting the future payments to present value by the counterparty risk. The counterparty risk considers the risk of the buyer having the cash to make the earnout payments and is commensurate with a cost of debt over an appropriate term.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, additional contingent consideration of $2.0 million was recognized in earnings related to a recent acquisition within the Bruker Nano Group based upon an increase in forecasted revenue levels for the acquired business for the remainder of 2017 and was recorded within other charges, net in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.

The following table sets forth the changes in contingent consideration liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2017 (in millions):

Balance at December 31, 2016	$	16.6
Current period additions	4.7
Current period adjustments	2.0
Current period settlements	(11.2		)
Foreign currency effect	0.4
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	12.5

6. Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following (in millions):

	June 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
Raw materials	$	152.6	$	132.8
Work-in-process	201.0		181.0
Finished goods	105.9		91.8
Demonstration units	45.6		34.8
Inventories	$	505.1	$	440.4

Finished goods include in-transit systems that have been shipped to the Company’s customers, but not yet installed and accepted by the customer. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the value of inventory-in-transit was $38.9 million and $37.5 million, respectively.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. This guidance eliminates the measurement of inventory at market value, and inventory will now be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The ASU defines net realizable value as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. No other changes were made to the current guidance on inventory

Table of Contents

measurement. The Company adopted ASU No. 2015-11 on a prospective basis in the first quarter of 2017. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

7. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The following table sets forth the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2017 (in millions):

Balance at December 31, 2016	$	130.6
Goodwill acquired during the period	32.2
Foreign currency effect	2.6
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	165.4

The following is a summary of intangible assets (in millions):

	June 30, 2017							December 31, 2016
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
Existing technology and related patents	$	190.0	$	(125.8	)	$	64.2	$	169.0	$	(113.9	)	$	55.1
Customer relationships	33.9		(10.4		)	23.5		20.0		(7.9		)	12.1
Non compete contracts	1.8		(1.3		)	0.5		1.8		(1.1		)	0.7
Trade names	4.0		(0.6		)	3.4		1.6		(0.4		)	1.2
Intangible assets subject to amortization	229.7		(138.1		)	91.6		192.4		(123.3		)	69.1
In-process research and development	0.6		—			0.6		0.6		—			0.6
Intangible assets	$	230.3	$	(138.1	)	$	92.2	$	193.0	$	(123.3	)	$	69.7

For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded amortization expense of $7.5 million and $5.4 million, respectively, related to intangible assets subject to amortization. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded amortization expense of $14.4 million and $10.8 million, respectively, related to intangible assets subject to amortization.

The goodwill and intangibles acquired in the first quarter of 2017 related primarily to the Hysitron and Luxendo acquisitions. Please see Note 2—Acquisitions, for additional details on the goodwill and intangibles acquired.

8. Debt

The Company’s debt obligations as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 consisted of the following (in millions):

	June 30,			December 31,
	2017			2016
US Dollar revolving loan under the 2015 Credit Agreement	$	210.0		$	171.0
US Dollar notes under the Note Purchase Agreement	220.0			240.0
Unamortized debt issuance costs under the Note Purchase Agreement	(0.7		)	(0.8		)
Capital lease obligations and other loans	1.5			1.5
Total debt	430.8			411.7
Current portion of long-term debt	(0.1		)	(20.1		)
Total long-term debt, less current portion	$	430.7		$	391.6

On October 27, 2015, the Company entered into a new revolving credit agreement, referred to as the 2015 Credit Agreement. The 2015 Credit Agreement provides a maximum commitment on the Company’s revolving credit line of $500 million and a maturity date of October 2020. Borrowings under the revolving credit line of the 2015 Credit Agreement accrue interest, at the Company’s option, at either (a) the greatest of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% and (iii) adjusted LIBOR plus 1.00%, plus margins ranging from 0.00% to 0.30% or (b) LIBOR, plus margins ranging from 0.90% to 1.30%. There is also a facility fee ranging from 0.10% to 0.20%.

Table of Contents

Borrowings under the 2015 Credit Agreement are secured by guarantees from certain material subsidiaries, as defined in the 2015 Credit Agreement. The 2015 Credit Agreement also requires the Company to maintain certain financial ratios related to maximum leverage and minimum interest coverage (as defined in the 2015 Credit Agreement). Specifically, the Company’s leverage ratio cannot exceed 3.5 and the Company’s interest coverage ratio cannot be less than 2.5. In addition to the financial ratios, the 2015 Credit Agreement contains negative covenants, including among others, restrictions on liens, indebtedness of the Company and its subsidiaries, asset sales, dividends and transactions with affiliates. Failure to comply with any of these restrictions or covenants may result in an event of default on the 2015 Credit Agreement, which could permit acceleration of the debt and require the Company to prepay the debt before its scheduled due date.

The following is a summary of the maximum commitments and the net amounts available to the Company under the 2015 Credit Agreement and other lines of credit with various financial institutions located primarily in Germany and Switzerland that are unsecured and typically due upon demand with interest payable monthly, at June 30, 2017 (in millions):

	Weighted Average Interest Rate		Total Amount Committed by Lenders		Outstanding Borrowings		Outstanding Letters of Credit		Total Amount Available
2015 Credit Agreement	2.3	%	$	500.0	$	210.0	$	1.1	$	288.9
Other lines of credit	—		249.2		—		130.6		118.6
Total revolving lines of credit			$	749.2	$	210.0	$	131.7	$	407.5

In January 2012, the Company entered into a note purchase agreement, referred to as the Note Purchase Agreement, with a group of accredited institutional investors. Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, the Company issued and sold $240.0 million of senior notes, referred to as the Senior Notes, which consisted of the following:

· $20.0 million 3.16% Series 2012A Senior Notes, Tranche A, due January 18, 2017;

· $15.0 million 3.74% Series 2012A Senior Notes, Tranche B, due January 18, 2019;

· $105.0 million 4.31% Series 2012A Senior Notes, Tranche C, due January 18, 2022; and

· $100.0 million 4.46% Series 2012A Senior Notes, Tranche D, due January 18, 2024.

On January 18, 2017, the outstanding $20.0 million principal amount of Tranche A of the Senior Notes was repaid in accordance with the terms of the Note Purchase Agreement.

Under the terms of the Note Purchase Agreement, the Company may issue and sell additional senior notes up to an aggregate principal amount of $600 million, subject to certain conditions. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on January 18 and July 18 of each year. The Senior Notes are unsecured obligations of the Company and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by certain of the Company’s direct and indirect subsidiaries. The Senior Notes rank pari passu in right of repayment with the Company’s other senior unsecured indebtedness. The Company may prepay some or all of the Senior Notes at any time in an amount not less than 10% of the original aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes to be prepaid, at a price equal to the sum of (a) 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, and (b) the applicable make-whole amount, upon not less than 30 and no more than 60 days written notice to the holders of the Senior Notes. In the event of a change in control of the Company, as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement, the Company may be required to prepay the Notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

The Note Purchase Agreement contains affirmative covenants, including, without limitation, maintenance of corporate existence, compliance with laws, maintenance of insurance and properties, payment of taxes, addition of subsidiary guarantors and furnishing notices and other information. The Note Purchase Agreement also contains certain restrictive covenants that restrict the Company’s ability to, among other things, incur liens, transfer or sell assets, engage in certain mergers and consolidations and enter into transactions with affiliates. The Note Purchase Agreement also includes customary representations and warranties and events of default. In the case of an event of default arising from specified events of bankruptcy or insolvency, all outstanding Senior Notes will become due and payable immediately without further action or notice. In the case of payment events of defaults, any holder of Senior Notes affected thereby may declare all Senior Notes held by it due and payable immediately. In the case of any other event of default, a majority of the holders of the Senior Notes may declare all the Senior Notes to be due and payable immediately. Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, so long as any Senior Notes are outstanding the Company will not permit (i) its leverage ratio, as determined pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, as of the end of any fiscal quarter to exceed 3.50 to 1.00, (ii) its interest coverage ratio as determined pursuant to

Table of Contents

the Note Purchase Agreement as of the end of any fiscal quarter for any period of four consecutive fiscal quarters to be less than 2.50 to 1 or (iii) priority debt at any time to exceed 25% of consolidated net worth, as determined pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement.

As of June 30, 2017, the Company was in compliance with the covenants of the Note Purchase Agreement and the 2015 Credit Agreement. The Company’s leverage ratio (as defined in the respective agreements) was 1.46 and interest coverage ratio (as defined in the respective agreements) was 15.0.

9. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Interest Rate Risks

The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to outstanding variable rate debt and adverse movements in the related short-term market rates. The most significant component of the Company’s interest rate risk relates to amounts outstanding under the 2015 Credit Agreement, which totaled $210.0 million at June 30, 2017. The Company currently has approximately equal levels of fixed and floating rate debt, which limits the exposure to adverse movements in interest rates.

Foreign Exchange Rate Risk Management

The Company generates a substantial portion of its revenues and expenses in international markets, principally Germany and other countries in the European Union and Switzerland, which subjects its operations to the exposure of exchange rate fluctuations. The impact of currency exchange rate movement can be positive or negative in any period. The Company periodically enters into foreign currency contracts in order to minimize the volatility that fluctuations in currency translation have on its monetary transactions. Under these arrangements, the Company typically agrees to purchase a fixed amount of a foreign currency in exchange for a fixed amount of U.S. Dollars or other currencies on specified dates with maturities of less than twelve months. These transactions do not qualify for hedge accounting and, accordingly, the instrument is recorded at fair value with the corresponding gains and losses recorded in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss). The Company had the following notional amounts outstanding under foreign exchange contracts at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in millions):

Buy	Notional Amount in Buy Currency	Sell	Maturity	Notional Amount in U.S. Dollars		Fair Value of Assets		Fair Value of Liabilities
June 30, 2017:
Euro	83.6	U.S. Dollars	July 2017 to January 2018	$	90.7	$	5.3	$	—


U.S. Dollars	4.3	Euro	July 2017	4.3		—		0.1

Swiss Francs	10.9	U.S. Dollars	July 2017	11.0		0.4		—

Euro	1.4	Polish Zloty	July 2017	1.6		—		—
				$	107.6	$	5.7	$	0.1

December 31, 2016:
Euro	21.1	U.S. Dollars	January 2017	$	23.3	$	—	$	1.1

Swiss Francs	7.9	U.S. Dollars	January 2017	8.0		—		0.3

U.S. Dollars	4.0	Israel Shekel	January 2017	4.0		—		—

Israel Shekel	15.3	U.S. Dollars	January 2017	4.0		—		—

Euro	1.4	Polish Zloty	January 2017	1.4		—		—
				$	40.7	$	—	$	1.4

In addition, the Company periodically enters into purchase and sales contracts denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the parties to the transaction. The Company accounts for these transactions separately valuing the “embedded derivative” component of these contracts. The contracts, denominated in currencies other than the functional

Table of Contents

currency of the transacting parties, amounted to $103.0 million for the delivery of products and $2.7 million for the purchase of products at June 30, 2017 and $120.7 million for the delivery of products and $2.3 million for the purchase of products at December 31, 2016. The changes in the fair value of these embedded derivatives are recorded in interest and other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss).

Commodity Price Risk Management

The Company has arrangements with certain customers under which it has a firm commitment to deliver copper based superconductor wire at a fixed price. In order to minimize the volatility that fluctuations in the price of copper have on the Company’s sales of these commodities, the Company enters into commodity hedge contracts. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had fixed price commodity contracts with notional amounts aggregating $6.3 million and $2.7 million, respectively. The changes in the fair value of these commodity contracts are recorded within interest and other income (expense), net in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.

The fair value of the derivative instruments described above is recorded in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets for the periods as follows (in millions):

		June 30,		December 31,
	Balance Sheet Location	2017		2016
Derivative assets:
Foreign exchange contracts	Other current assets	$	5.7	$	—
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts	Other current assets	0.8		2.7
Fixed price commodity contracts	Other current assets	0.4		0.2
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts	Other long-term assets	—		1.3

Derivative liabilities:
Foreign exchange contracts	Other current liabilities	$	0.1	$	1.4
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts	Other current liabilities	0.5		0.3
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts	Other long-term liabilities	0.3		—

The impact on net income of unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments are as follows (in millions):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Foreign exchange contracts	$	6.1		$	(1.6	)	$	7.0		$	0.6
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts	(3.0		)	—			(3.7		)	(0.3		)
Fixed price commodity contracts	0.1			0.1			0.2			0.2
Net impact to interest and other income (expense)	$	3.2		$	(1.5	)	$	3.5		$	0.5

The amounts related to derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments are recorded within interest and other income (expense), net in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.

10. Provision for Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability approach by recognizing deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of differences between the financial statement basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, calculated using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to be reflected in the tax return. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In addition, the Company accounts for uncertain tax positions that have reached a minimum recognition threshold.

Table of Contents

The income tax provision for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $6.2 million and $3.0 million, respectively, representing effective tax rates of 20.5% and 16.9%, respectively. The income tax provision for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $16.1 million and $7.8 million, respectively, representing effective tax rates of 26.1% and 16.9%, respectively. The increase in the Company’s effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016, was primarily caused by the recognition of previously uncertain tax benefits due to the closure of certain tax audits and the release of valuation allowances in the first half of 2016. The Company’s effective tax rate may change over time as the amount or mix of income and taxes changes among the jurisdictions in which the Company is subject to tax.

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits, excluding penalties and interest, of approximately $5.9 million and $6.2 million, respectively, of which $5.1 million and $5.3 million, if recognized, would result in a reduction of the Company’s effective tax rate. The Company recognizes penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, approximately $0.5 million of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions was included in each period in other long-term liabilities on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. Penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax benefits of $1.0 million and $3.3 million were recorded in the provision for income taxes during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. No corresponding amount was recorded in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017.

The Company files tax returns in the United States, which includes federal, state and local jurisdictions, and many foreign jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. The Company considers Germany, the United States and Switzerland to be its significant tax jurisdictions. The majority of the Company’s earnings are derived in Germany and Switzerland. Accounting for the various federal and local taxing authorities, the statutory rates for 2017 are expected to be 28% and 20.5% for Germany and Switzerland, respectively. The expected mix of earnings in those two jurisdictions results in an expected reduction of 8.2% from the US statutory rate of 35% in 2017. The Company has not been party to any tax holiday agreements. The tax years 2013 to 2016 are open to examination in Germany and Switzerland. In 2016, the Company settled tax audits in Germany and Switzerland. The settlements were immaterial to the consolidated financial statements. Tax years 2011 to 2016 remain open for examination in the United States.

The Company asserts that its foreign earnings, with the exception of its foreign earnings that have been previously taxed by the U.S., are indefinitely reinvested. The Company regularly evaluates its assertion that its foreign earnings are indefinitely reinvested. If the cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments held by the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are needed to fund operations in the United States or the Company otherwise elects to repatriate the unremitted earnings of its foreign subsidiaries in the form of dividends or otherwise, or if the shares of the subsidiaries were sold or transferred, the Company would likely be subject to additional U.S. income taxes, net of the impact of any available tax credits, which could result in a higher effective tax rate in the future.

11. Commitments and Contingencies

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 450, Contingencies, the Company accrues anticipated costs of settlement, damages, or other costs to the extent specific losses are probable and estimable.

Litigation and Related Contingencies

Lawsuits, claims and proceedings of a nature considered normal to its businesses may be pending from time to time against the Company. Third parties might allege that the Company or its collaborators are infringing their patent rights or that the Company is otherwise violating their intellectual property rights. Loss contingency provisions are recorded if the potential loss from any claim, asserted or unasserted, or legal proceeding is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated or a range of loss can be determined. These accruals represent management’s best estimate of probable loss. Disclosure also is provided when it is reasonably possible that a loss will be incurred or when it is reasonably possible that the amount of a loss will exceed the recorded provision. The Company believes the outcome of pending proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, no material accruals have been recorded for potential contingencies.

Governmental Investigations

The Korea Fair Trade Commission (“KFTC”) has conducted an investigation into improper bidding by Bruker Korea Co., Ltd. and several other companies in connection with bids for sales of X-ray systems in 2010 and 2012. Three of the bids under investigation involved Bruker Korea. The Company cooperated fully with the KFTC regarding this matter. In September 2016,

Table of Contents

the KFTC fined Bruker Korea approximately $15,000 and referred the matter to the Korean Public Prosecutor’s Office (“PPO”) for criminal prosecution. On May 31, 2017, the PPO issued official notice of its decision not to pursue criminal proceedings against Bruker Korea. Additionally, since December 2016, various Korean governmental entities imposed suspensions on Bruker Korea, with overlapping suspension periods ranging from three to six months. During the periods of these suspensions, Bruker Korea was prohibited from bidding for or conducting sales to Korean governmental agencies. Sales to these customers were less than 1% of the Company’s revenue for the year ended December 31, 2016. At June 30, 2017, all such suspension periods had lapsed. The Company considers these matters resolved and no additional payments are owed or accrued as of June 30, 2017 in connection with such resolutions.

Letters of Credit and Guarantees

At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had bank guarantees of $131.7 million and $131.5 million, respectively, related primarily to customer advances. These arrangements guarantee the refund of advance payments received from customers in the event that the merchandise is not delivered or warranty obligations are not fulfilled in compliance with the terms of the contract. These guarantees affect the availability of the Company’s lines of credit.

12. Shareholders’ Equity

Share Repurchase Program

In May 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program (the “Repurchase Program”) under which repurchases of common stock up to $225.0 million may occur from time to time, in amounts, at prices, and at such times as the Company deems appropriate, subject to market conditions, legal requirements and other considerations. A total of 1,594,930 shares were repurchased at an aggregate cost of $43.9 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. Any future repurchases will be funded from cash on hand, future cash flows from operations and available borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

The repurchased shares are reflected within Treasury stock in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2017. Subsequent to June 30, 2017 through August 4, 2017, the Company has repurchased an additional 670,000 shares at an aggregate cost of $19.2 million.

Cash Dividends on Shares of Common Stock

On February 22, 2016, the Company announced the establishment of a dividend policy and the declaration by its Board of Directors of an initial quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $0.04 per share of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. Under the dividend policy, the Company will target a cash dividend to the Company’s shareholders in the amount of $0.16 per share per annum, payable in equal quarterly installments. Dividends were paid on March 24, 2017 to shareholders of record as of March 8, 2017 and on June 23, 2017 to shareholders of record as of June 5, 2017, in each case for an aggregate cost of $6.4 million. Subsequent dividend declarations and the establishment of record and payment dates for such future dividend payments, if any, are subject to the Board of Directors’ continuing determination that the dividend policy is in the best interests of the Company’s shareholders. The dividend policy may be suspended or cancelled at the discretion of the Board of Directors at any time.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income(Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) refers to revenues, expenses, gains and losses that under U.S. GAAP are included in other comprehensive income (loss), but excluded from net income as these amounts are recorded directly as an adjustment to shareholders’ equity, net of tax. The Company’s other comprehensive income (loss) is composed primarily of foreign currency translation adjustments and changes in the funded status of defined benefit pension plans. The following is a summary of comprehensive income (loss) (in millions):

Table of Contents

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Consolidated net income	$	24.0		$	14.8		$	45.7		$	38.4
Foreign currency translation adjustments	49.5			(18.6		)	65.1			15.0
Pension liability adjustments	(1.9		)	1.6			(1.7		)	0.6
Net comprehensive income (loss)	71.6			(2.2		)	109.1			54.0
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests	1.0			0.1			1.2			0.3
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Bruker Corporation	$	70.6		$	(2.3	)	$	107.9		$	53.7

The following is a summary of the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, at June 30, 2017 (in millions):

	Foreign Currency Translation			Pension Liability Adjustment			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	(24.1	)	$	(51.8	)	$	(75.9	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	64.6			1.7			66.3
Amounts reclassified from other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax of $0.2 million	—			(3.4		)	(3.4		)
Net current period other comprehensive income	64.6			(1.7		)	62.9
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	40.5		$	(53.5	)	$	(13.0	)

13. Noncontrolling Interests

Noncontrolling interests represent the minority shareholders’ proportionate share of the Company’s majority owned subsidiaries. The following table sets forth the changes in noncontrolling interests (in millions):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Balance at beginning of period	$	6.9		$	7.0		$	6.7		$	6.8
Net income	0.6			0.3			0.7			0.3
Foreign currency translation adjustments	0.4			(0.2		)	0.5			—
Cash payments to noncontrolling interests	(0.5		)	—			(0.5		)	—
Balance at end of period	$	7.4		$	7.1		$	7.4		$	7.1

14. Other Charges, Net

The components of other charges, net were as follows (in millions):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Information technology transformation costs	$	0.9	$	1.7	$	2.1	$	3.9
Restructuring charges	2.4		1.8		3.9		3.6
Acquisition-related charges	2.9		7.9		3.3		7.9
Other	0.2		0.6		0.2		0.6
Other charges, net	$	6.4	$	12.0	$	9.5	$	16.0

Table of Contents

Restructuring Initiatives

2016

The Company commenced a restructuring initiative in the third quarter of 2016 to address lower demand in the Bruker CALID and Bruker Nano Groups as a result of softness in order entry levels from European academic institutions and ongoing weakness in several of the industrial end market segments served by the Bruker Nano Group. This initiative was intended to improve the Bruker CALID Group and Bruker Nano Group operating results in response to these market conditions. Restructuring actions resulted in a reduction of approximately 125 employees within the Bruker CALID and Bruker Nano Groups.

The following is a summary of the restructuring expenses related to this initiative which are recorded in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017:

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2017						2017
	Severance and Exit Costs		Inventory Writedown and Asset Impairment		Total		Severance and Exit Costs		Inventory Writedown and Asset Impairment		Total
Cost of revenues	$	0.7	$	—	$	0.7	$	1.9	$	0.3	$	2.2
Other charges, net	0.8				0.8		1.6		—		1.6
	$	1.5	$	—	$	1.5	$	3.5	$	0.3	$	3.8

As this program commenced in the third quarter of 2016, there were no expenses incurred during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.

Total restructuring and other one-time charges incurred through June 30, 2017 related to this initiative were $14.3 million. Total restructuring and other one-time charges related to this initiative in 2016 and 2017 are expected to be between $16.0 and $18.0 million, of which $15.0 to $16.5 million relate to employee separation and facility exit costs and $1.0 to $1.5 million relate to estimated inventory write-downs and asset impairments.

2015

The Company commenced a restructuring initiative in 2015 within the Bruker BioSpin Group, which was developed as a result of a revenue decline that occurred during the second half of 2014 and continued during the first half of 2015. This initiative was intended to improve Bruker BioSpin Group’s operating results. Restructuring actions resulted in a reduction of employee headcount within the Bruker BioSpin Group of approximately 9%. The remaining significant expenses related to this initiative were incurred in the six months ended June 30, 2017 in connection with the sale of a manufacturing facility.

	Six months ended June 30,
	2017								2016
				Inventory							Inventory
				Writedown							Writedown
	Severance and			and Asset					Severance and		and Asset
	Exit Costs			Impairment		Total			Exit Costs		Impairment		Total
Cost of revenues	$	(2.7	)	$	—	$	(2.7	)	$	2.2	$	—	$	2.2
Other charges, net	—			—		—			1.1		—		1.1
	$	(2.7	)	$	—	$	(2.7	)	$	3.3	$	—	$	3.3

As of June 30, 2017, expenses incurred under this restructuring initiative were substantially complete. There were no restructuring expenses incurred for this program in the three months ended June 30, 2017. Restructuring expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2016 related to this initiative were $1.0 million of severance and exit costs, of which $0.9 million was recorded as a component of Cost of Revenue and $0.1 million as a component of Other Charges, net in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss).

Table of Contents

Restructuring charges for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 included charges for various other programs which were recorded in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Cost of revenues	$	0.7	$	0.9	$	0.5	$	1.7
Other charges, net	1.6		1.8		2.3		2.5
	$	2.3	$	2.7	$	2.8	$	4.2

The following table sets forth the changes in restructuring reserves for the six months ended June 30, 2017 (in millions):

	Total			Severance			Exit Costs			Provisions for Excess Inventory
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	16.2		$	4.9		$	3.7		$	7.6
Restructuring charges	3.9			2.8			1.0			0.1
Cash payments	(7.3		)	(5.5		)	(1.6		)	(0.2		)
Other, non-cash adjustments and foreign currency effect	(1.7		)	—			(0.4		)	(1.3		)
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	11.1		$	2.2		$	2.7		$	6.2

15. Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net

The components of interest and other income (expense), net, were as follows (in millions):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Interest expense, net	$	(3.8	)	$	(2.9	)	$	(7.5	)	$	(6.0	)
Exchange gains (losses) on foreign currency transactions	(1.9		)	0.7			(4.2		)	(1.6		)
Other	2.4			(0.4		)	2.4			(0.6		)
Interest and other income (expense), net	$	(3.3	)	$	(2.6	)	$	(9.3	)	$	(8.2	)

16. Business Segment Information

The Company has two reportable segments, BSI and BEST, as discussed in Note 1 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Revenue and operating income by reportable segment are presented below (in millions):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Revenue:
BSI	$	362.5		$	345.7		$	708.9		$	696.1
BEST	54.0			28.5			94.1			55.7
Eliminations (a)	(1.6		)	(2.5		)	(3.2		)	(4.7		)
Total revenue	$	414.9		$	371.7		$	799.8		$	747.1

Operating Income
BSI	$	30.5		$	18.9		$	68.6		$	51.9
BEST	3.0			1.4			2.5			1.4
Corporate, eliminations and other (b)	—			0.1			—			1.1
Total operating income	$	33.5		$	20.4		$	71.1		$	54.4

(a) Represents product and service revenue between reportable segments.

(b) Represents corporate costs and eliminations not allocated to the reportable segments.

Table of Contents

Total assets by reportable segment are as follows (in millions):

	June 30,			December 31,
	2017			2016
Assets:
BSI	$	1,882.3		$	1,779.8
BEST	34.1			36.0
Eliminations and other (a)	(3.5		)	(7.4		)
Total assets	$	1,912.9		$	1,808.4

(a) Assets not allocated to the reportable segments and eliminations of intercompany transactions.

17. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Boards (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The new standard simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating the second step of the goodwill impairment test. This ASU will be applied prospectively and is effective for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. This new standard clarifies the definition of a business and provides a screen to determine when an integrated set of assets and activities is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. This new standard will be effective as of January 1, 2018. While early adoption is permitted, the Company expects to adopt ASU No. 2017-01 as of the effective date. The Company is evaluating the provisions of this standard, including which period to adopt, and has not determined what impact the adoption of ASU No. 2017-01 will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Intra-Entity Transfer of Assets Other than Inventory. The new standard requires recognition of current and deferred income taxes resulting from an intra-entity transfer of any asset (excluding inventory) when the transfer occurs. This is a change from existing GAAP which prohibits recognition of current and deferred income taxes until the asset is sold to a third party. The new standard is effective as of January 1, 2018. While early adoption is permitted, the Company expects to adopt ASU No. 2016-16 as of the effective date. The Company is evaluating the provisions of this standard and has not determined what impact the adoption of ASU No. 2016-16 will have on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases. The new standard provides guidance on the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of leases. The new standard supersedes present U.S. GAAP guidance on leases and requires substantially all leases to be reported on the balance sheet as right-of-use assets and lease liabilities, as well as additional disclosures. The new standard is effective as of January 1, 2019. While early adoption is permitted, the Company expects to adopt ASU No. 2016-02 as of the effective date. The Company is evaluating the provisions of this standard and has not determined what impact the adoption of ASU No. 2016-02 will have on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 605. The new guidance was the result of a joint project between the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop common revenue standards for U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The core principle of the new guidance is that revenue should be recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU No. 2014-09 was originally effective prospectively for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those years. In August 2015, the FASB elected to defer the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 by one year to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early application permitted as of the original effective date.

Table of Contents

The new guidance may be applied on a retrospective basis for all prior periods presented, or on a modified retrospective basis with the cumulative effect of the new guidance as of the date of initial application. The new guidance will be effective for the Company as of January 1, 2018 and the Company currently expects to use the modified retrospective transition method.

The Company substantially completed the impact assessment phase of its evaluation of ASU No. 2014-09. As a result of its impact assessment, the Company will be implementing additional processes and controls, including additional disclosures, to comply with the new standard. The largest financial impact will be the timing of revenue recognition for certain project-based orders in the BEST Segment for which the Company currently applies the percentage-of-completion or completed contract model. Under the new guidance, there are specific criteria to determine if a performance obligation should be recognized over time or at a point in time. The Company expects that in some cases the revenue recognition timing under the new guidance will change from current practice based on applying the specific criteria under the new guidance. The Company has not yet quantified the impact the adoption of ASU No. 2014-09 will have on the consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements included in Part 1, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Statements contained in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which express that we “believe,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “expect,” “seek,” “estimate,” or “should,” as well as other statements which are not historical fact, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual events or results may differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements. Certain factors that might cause such a difference are discussed in “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Although our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP), we believe describing revenue and expenses, excluding the effects of foreign currency, acquisitions and divestitures, as well as certain other charges, net, provides meaningful supplemental information regarding our performance. Specifically, management believes that free cash flow and organic revenue, both non-GAAP financial measures, as well as non-GAAP gross profit margin and non-GAAP operating margin, provide relevant and useful information which is widely used by equity analysts, investors and competitors in our industry, as well as by our management, in assessing both consolidated and business unit performance. We define the term organic revenue as GAAP revenue excluding the effect of foreign currency changes and the effect of acquisitions and divestitures. We define the term non-GAAP gross profit margin as GAAP gross profit margin with certain non-GAAP measures excluded and non-GAAP operating margin as GAAP operating margin with certain non-GAAP measures excluded. These non-GAAP measures exclude costs related to restructuring actions, acquisition and related integration expenses, amortization of acquired intangible assets and other costs that are infrequent or non-recurring in nature and we believe these are useful measures to evaluate our continuing business. We define free cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities less additions to property, plant, and equipment. We believe free cash flow is a useful measure to evaluate our business as it indicates the amount of cash generated after additions to property, plant, and equipment which is available for, among other things, investments in our business, acquisitions, share repurchases, dividends and repayment of debt. We use these non-GAAP financial measures to evaluate our period-over-period operating performance because our management believes they provide more comparable measures of our continuing business because they adjust for certain items that are not reflective of the underlying performance of our business. These measures may also be useful to investors in evaluating the underlying operating performance of our business. We regularly use these non-GAAP financial measures internally to understand, manage, and evaluate our business results and make operating decisions. We also measure our employees and compensate them, in part, based on such non-GAAP measures and use this information for our planning and forecasting activities. The presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures is not intended to be a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP and may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies, and therefore, may not be comparable among companies.

Table of Contents

OVERVIEW

Bruker develops and manufactures high-performance scientific instruments and analytical and diagnostic solutions that enable its customers to explore life and materials at microscopic, molecular and cellular levels. The Company’s products address the needs of a diverse array of customers in life science research, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, applied markets, cell biology, clinical research, microbiology, in-vitro diagnostics, nanotechnology and materials science research. We are organized into four operating segments: the Bruker BioSpin Group, the Bruker CALID Group, the Bruker Nano Group and the Bruker Energy & Supercon Technologies (BEST) Segment.

Revenue for the three month period ended June 30, 2017 was $414.9 million, an increase of $43.2 million, or 11.6%, from the three month period ended June 30, 2016. Improved academic and industrial research and applied end markets resulted in increased revenues in our Bruker CALID and Bruker Nano Groups. Higher demand from the BEST Segment’s superconducting wire customers resulted in approximately half of the year over year revenue increase. Geographically, organic revenue showed solid growth in Asia Pacific, particularly China, a decline in Europe and modest growth in the Americas. The new funding plan introduced in China last year, which is focused on fundamental, academic and industrial research in less developed regions, enabled the revenue growth. The rate of decline in European markets was lower in the second quarter, primarily due to improving academic markets. Approximately $21.6 million of the revenue increase was related to recent acquisitions, primarily the acquisitions of Oxford Instruments Superconducting Wire LLC (OST) and Hysitron, Incorporated (Hysitron), which was offset in part by an unfavorable currency translation impact of approximately $6.8 million caused by the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar versus the Euro, British Pound and other currencies. Excluding the effects of foreign currency translation and our recent acquisitions, our organic revenue, a non-GAAP measure, increased by $28.4 million, or 7.6%.

Revenue for the six month period ended June 30, 2017 was $799.8 million, an increase of $52.7 million, or 7.1%, from the six month period ended June 30, 2016. Approximately $41.3 million of the revenue increase was related to recent acquisitions, primarily the acquisitions of OST and Hysitron, which was offset in part by an unfavorable currency translation impact of approximately $14.1 million caused by the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar versus the Euro, British Pound and other currencies. Excluding the effects of foreign currency translation and our recent acquisitions, our organic revenue, a non-GAAP measure, increased by $25.5 million, or 3.4%. Similar factors to the three month period ended June 30, 2017 impacted the increase in revenue for the six month period ended June 30, 2017, as well as higher BioSpin Group industrial customer acceptances.

Our gross profit margin decreased to 44.2% during the three months ended June 30, 2017 from 45.8% during the three months ended June 30, 2016. Our gross profit margin decreased to 45.0% from 45.1% during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The decreases were caused primarily by changes in revenue mix and the impact of our recent acquisitions, primarily the OST acquisition within the BEST Segment. These effects were partially offset by incremental profit on the Bruker CALID Group and Bruker Nano Group sales increases, as well as the effect of last year’s cost reduction actions in these groups.

Our operating margin increased to 8.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2017 from 5.5% during the three months ended June 30, 2016. Operating margin increased to 8.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2017 from 7.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The operating margin expansion was a result of increased operating leverage resulting from higher revenue.

The income tax provision in the three month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $6.2 million and $3.0 million, respectively, representing effective tax rates of 20.5% and 16.9%, respectively. The income tax provision in the six month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $16.1 million and $7.8 million, respectively, representing effective tax rates of 26.1% and 16.9%, respectively. The Company’s first half of 2016 effective tax rate reflected the benefits of certain discrete tax items in that period, including the recognition of previously uncertain tax benefits resulting from the closure of certain tax audits and the release of valuation allowances. These discrete tax items were not recurring in the three and six month period ended June 30, 2017, resulting in a significantly higher effective tax rate for the first half of 2017.

Diluted earnings per share for the three month periods ended June 30, 2017 were $0.15, an increase of $0.06 from the three month period ended June 30, 2016. Earnings per share increased $0.05 to $0.28 per diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2017 when compared to the same period in 2016. The increases were due to operational improvements and revenue growth from recent acquisitions.

Operating cash flow for the six month period ended June 30, 2017 was a source of cash of $15.4 million. For the six month period ended June 30, 2017, our free cash flow, a non-GAAP measure, was ($5.7) million, calculated as follows:

Table of Contents

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	15.4		$	4.1
Less: Purchases of property, plant and equipment	21.1			17.2
Free Cash Flow	$	(5.7	)	$	(13.1	)

In May 2017, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program (the “Repurchase Program”) that authorized repurchases of up to $225.0 million of common stock. A total of 1,594,930 shares were repurchased at an aggregate cost of $43.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2017.

In the six months ended June 30, 2017, we completed various acquisitions that collectively complemented our existing product offerings in our various businesses and added aftermarket and software capabilities to our existing microbiology business. The impact of acquired companies on revenues, net income and total assets was not material.

We can experience quarter-to-quarter fluctuations in our operating results as a result of various factors, some of which are outside our control, such as:

· the timing of governmental stimulus programs and academic research budgets;

· the time it takes between the date customer orders and deposits are received, systems are shipped and accepted by our customers and full payment is received;

· the time it takes to satisfy local customs requirements and other export/import requirements;

· the time it takes for customers to construct or prepare their facilities for our products; and

· the time required to obtain governmental licenses.

These factors have in the past affected the amount and timing of revenue recognized on sales of our products and receipt of related payments and will continue to do so in the future. Accordingly, our operating results in any particular quarter may not necessarily be an indication of any future quarter’s operating performance. On July 27, 2017, the Chinese customs regulatory authority announced immediate changes in their tax free certification policies and procedures that may cause delays in the timing of imports, deliveries and acceptances of some of our products. While the potential impact of these changes on our industry are not yet fully understood, such import delays could negatively affect our financial results in the third and fourth quarters of 2017.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We base our estimates and judgments on our historical experience, current market and economic conditions, industry trends, and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable and form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

We believe the following critical accounting policies and estimates to be both those most important to the portrayal of our financial position and results of operations and those that require the most estimation and subjective judgment:

· Revenue recognition;

· Income taxes;

· Inventories; and

· Goodwill, other intangible assets and other long-lived assets.

For a further discussion of our critical accounting policies, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. We no longer consider changes in employee benefit plan assumptions to be a critical accounting policy. There were no other significant changes to our critical accounting policies for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2016

Consolidated Results

The following table presents our results for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in millions, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016
Product revenue	$	345.9		$	305.6
Service revenue	67.1			63.5
Other revenue	1.9			2.6
Total revenue	414.9			371.7

Cost of product revenue	192.6			162.3
Cost of service revenue	38.7			38.0
Cost of other revenue	0.2			1.3
Total cost of revenue	231.5			201.6
Gross profit	183.4			170.1

Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative	102.8			100.9
Research and development	40.7			36.8
Other charges, net	6.4			12.0
Total operating expenses	149.9			149.7
Operating income	33.5			20.4

Interest and other income (expense), net	(3.3		)	(2.6		)
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries	30.2			17.8
Income tax (benefit) provision	6.2			3.0
Consolidated net income	24.0			14.8
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries	0.6			0.3
Net income attributable to Bruker Corporation	$	23.4		$	14.5

Net income per common share attributable to Bruker Corporation shareholders:
Basic	$	0.15		$	0.09
Diluted	$	0.15		$	0.09

Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic	159.5			161.4
Diluted	160.4			162.4

Revenue

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, our revenue increased $43.2 million, or 11.6%, to $414.9 million, compared to $371.7 million for the comparable period in 2016. Included in revenue was an increase of approximately $21.6 million from acquisitions, primarily the recent acquisitions of OST and Hysitron within the BEST Segment and the Bruker Nano Group, respectively, and a $6.8 million decrease caused by foreign currency translation. Excluding the effects of foreign currency translation and our recent acquisitions, our organic revenue, a non-GAAP measure, increased by $28.4 million, or 7.6%.

Table of Contents

BSI Segment revenue increased by $16.8 million, or 4.9%, to $362.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $345.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. BEST Segment revenue increased by $25.5 million, or 89.5%, to $54.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $28.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016.

Please see the Segment Results section later in this section for additional discussion of our revenue.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was $183.4 million, or 44.2% of revenue, compared to $170.1 million, or 45.8% of revenue, for the three months ended June 30, 2016. Included in gross profit were various charges for amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets and other acquisition-related costs and restructuring costs totaling $9.9 million and $6.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Excluding these charges, our non-GAAP gross profit margin for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was 46.6% and 47.6%, respectively. The decrease in our gross profit margins was caused primarily by changes in our revenue mix and the impact of our recent acquisitions, primarily the OST acquisition within the BEST Segment, partially offset by operating leverage associated with improving academic and industrial end market demand conditions in our Bruker CALID and Bruker Nano Groups.

Selling, General and Administrative

Our selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2017 increased to $102.8 million, or 24.8% of total revenue, from $100.9 million, or 27.1% of total revenue, for the comparable period in 2016. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was attributable to our recent acquisitions offset, in part by cost control measures put into place as part of our ongoing restructuring initiatives.

Research and Development

Our research and development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2017 increased to $40.7 million, or 9.8% of total revenue, from $36.8 million, or 9.9% of total revenue, for the comparable period in 2016. The increase in research and development expenses was primarily attributable to our recent acquisitions.

Other Charges, Net

Other charges, net of $6.4 million recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2017 were primarily related to the BSI Segment and consisted primarily of $2.4 million of restructuring costs related to closing facilities and implementing outsourcing and other restructuring initiatives, $0.9 million of costs associated with our global information technology (IT) transformation initiative and $2.9 million of acquisition-related charges related to acquisitions completed in 2016 and 2017. The IT transformation initiative is a multi-year project aimed at updating and integrating our global enterprise resource planning and human resource information systems.

Other charges, net of $12.0 million recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2016 were all related to the BSI Segment and consisted primarily of $7.9 million of acquisition-related charges, related primarily to additional contingent consideration recognized for a recent acquisition in the Bruker Nano Group based upon an increase in forecasted revenue levels of the acquired business for the remainder of 2016, $1.8 million of restructuring costs related to closing facilities and implementing outsourcing and other restructuring initiatives and $1.7 million of costs associated with our IT transformation initiative.

Operating Income

Operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was $33.5 million, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%, compared to operating income of $20.4 million, and an operating margin of 5.5%, for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in operating income during the three months ended June 30, 2017 was primarily the result of increased revenues in our Bruker CALID and Bruker Nano Groups, operational improvements and the impact of our recent restructuring actions, offset in part by costs associated with our recent acquisitions.

During the three months ended June 30, 2017, we continued to execute on a restructuring initiative launched in 2016 which is intended to improve the Bruker CALID and Bruker Nano Groups’ operating results.

Table of Contents

Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net

Interest and other income (expense), net during the three months ended June 30, 2017 was an expense of $3.3 million compared to an expense of $2.6 million for the comparable period of 2016.

During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the primary components within interest and other income (expense), net were net interest expense of $3.8 million and realized and unrealized losses on foreign currency denominated transactions of $1.9 million. These effects were offset in part by an insurance settlement of $2.4 million. During the three months ended June 30, 2016, the primary components within interest and other income (expense), net were net interest expense of $2.9 million and realized and unrealized gains on foreign currency denominated transactions of $0.7 million.

Income Tax (Benefit) Provision

The 2017 and 2016 effective tax rates were estimated using projected annual pre-tax income on a jurisdictional basis. Expected tax benefits, including tax credits and incentives, the impact of changes to valuation allowances, and the effect of jurisdictional differences in statutory tax rates, were also considered in the calculation.

The income tax provision for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $6.2 million and $3.0 million, respectively, representing effective tax rates of 20.5% and 16.9%, respectively. The Company’s second quarter 2016 effective tax rate reflected the benefits of certain discrete tax items in that quarter, including the release of valuation allowances and the recognition of previously uncertain tax benefits resulting from the closure of certain tax audits. These discrete tax items did not reoccur in the three month period ended June 30, 2017, resulting in a significantly higher effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2017.

The majority of the Company’s earnings are derived in Germany and Switzerland. Accounting for the various federal and local taxing authorities, the statutory rates for 2017 are expected to be 28% and 20.5% for Germany and Switzerland, respectively. The expected mix of earnings in those two jurisdictions results in an expected reduction of 8.2% from the US statutory rate of 35% in 2017. The Company has not been party to any tax holiday agreements.

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $0.6 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The net income attributable to noncontrolling interests represented the minority shareholders’ proportionate share of the net income recorded by our majority-owned subsidiaries.

Net Income Attributable to Bruker Corporation

Our net income for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was $23.4 million, or $0.15 per diluted share, compared to $14.5 million, or $0.09 per diluted share, for the comparable period in 2016. The increase in net income was primarily the result of operating improvements discussed above.

Segment Results

For financial reporting purposes, we aggregate the Bruker BioSpin, Bruker CALID and Bruker Nano operating segments into the Bruker Scientific Instruments (BSI) reportable segment, which represented approximately 87% of the Company’s revenues during the three months ended June 30, 2017. This aggregation reflects these operating segments’ similar economic characteristics, production processes, service offerings, types and classes of customers, methods of distribution and regulatory environments. Our BEST Segment is our other reportable segment and represents the remainder of our revenues.

Revenue

The following table presents revenue, change in revenue and revenue growth by reportable segment (dollars in millions):

Table of Contents

	Three Months Ended June 30,								Percentage
	2017			2016			Dollar Change		Change
BSI	$	362.5		$	345.7		$	16.8	4.9	%
BEST	54.0			28.5			25.5		89.5	%
Eliminations (a)	(1.6		)	(2.5		)	0.9
	$	414.9		$	371.7		$	43.2	11.6	%

(a) Represents product and service revenue between reportable segments.

BSI Segment Revenue

BSI Segment revenue increased by $16.8 million, or 4.9%, to $362.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $345.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. Revenue includes approximately $7.5 million attributable to recent acquisitions, which was offset in part by a $5.8 million decrease from the impact of foreign currency translation. Excluding the effects of foreign currency translation and our recent acquisitions, organic revenue, a non-GAAP measure, increased by $15.1 million, or 4.4%.

The Bruker BioSpin Group revenue increased during the three months ended June 30, 2017 when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016 due to increased revenues in preclinical imaging and the service division.

The Bruker CALID Group revenue increased during the three months ended June 30, 2017 when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016, primarily as a result of increased academic research demand in mass spectrometry and improved consumables, aftermarket and service revenues, as well as the timing of CBRNE product shipments as the three months ended June 30, 2017 benefited from a large contract. The volume of shipments of CBRNE products can be large in certain quarters and not sequentially consistent.

The Bruker Nano Group revenue remained consistent for the three months ended June 30, 2017 when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016. Revenues from recent acquisitions and improved academic and industrial end markets for X-ray products were offset by lower semiconductor metrology revenues due to the timing of shipments and acceptances.

System revenue and aftermarket revenue as a percentage of total BSI Segment revenue were as follows (dollars in millions):

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017				2016
	Revenue		Percentage of Segment Revenue		Revenue		Percentage of Segment Revenue
System revenue	$	260.4	71.8	%	$	241.8	69.9	%
Aftermarket revenue	102.1		28.2	%	103.9		30.1	%
Total revenue	$	362.5	100.0	%	$	345.7	100.0	%

BEST Segment Revenue

BEST Segment revenue increased $25.5 million, or 89.5%, to $54.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $28.5 million for the comparable period in 2016. The increase in revenue resulted from the OST acquisition, which was completed in the fourth quarter of 2016, and organic revenue growth caused by an acceleration of shipments of superconductors to large magnetic resonance imaging customers.

System and wire revenue and aftermarket revenue as a percentage of total BEST Segment revenue were as follows (dollars in millions):

Table of Contents

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017				2016
	Revenue		Percentage of Segment Revenue		Revenue		Percentage of Segment Revenue
System and wire revenue	$	53.3	98.7	%	$	27.7	97.2	%
Aftermarket revenue	0.7		1.3	%	0.8		2.8	%
Total revenue	$	54.0	100.0	%	$	28.5	100.0	%

Gross Profit and Operating Expenses

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, gross profit margin in the BSI Segment increased to 48.2% from 47.7% for the comparable period in 2016. The increase was primarily the result of operating leverage caused by increased revenues and operating cost improvements from recent restructuring and outsourcing actions within the Bruker CALID and Bruker Nano Groups. BEST Segment gross margin decreased to 15.9% from 18.2% for the comparable period in 2016 due to the impact of the OST acquisition. Integrations plans for the BEST Segment’s OST business include commercial and productivity improvement actions designed to achieve pre-acquisition profitability levels.

In the three months ended June 30, 2017, selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses in the BSI Segment increased to $138.4 million, or 38.2% of segment revenue, from $133.8 million, or 38.7% of segment revenue. This increase was primarily caused by the effect of recent acquisitions in our Bruker Nano Group and Bruker CALID Group.

Selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses in the BEST Segment increased to $5.1 million, or 9.4% of segment revenue, from $3.9 million, or 13.7% of segment revenue, for the comparable period in 2016. The decrease as a percent of revenue was primarily a result of the increase in revenue from due to the OST acquisition.

Operating Income

The following table presents operating income and operating margins on revenue by reportable segment (dollars in millions):

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017				2016
	Operating Income		Percentage of Segment Revenue		Operating Income		Percentage of Segment Revenue
BSI	$	30.5	8.4	%	$	18.9	5.5	%
BEST	3.0		5.6	%	1.4		4.9	%
Corporate, eliminations and other (a)	—				0.1
Total operating income	$	33.5	8.1	%	$	20.4	5.5	%

(a) Represents corporate costs and eliminations not allocated to the reportable segments.

BSI Segment operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was $30.5 million, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%, compared to operating income of $18.9 million, resulting in an operating margin of 5.5%, for the comparable period in 2016. Operating income included $16.3 million and $19.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, of various charges for amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets and other acquisition-related costs, restructuring costs, and costs associated with our global IT transformation initiative. Excluding these charges, non-GAAP operating margins were 12.9% and 11.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. GAAP and non-GAAP operating margins increased primarily due to the gross margin improvements noted above, as well as lower selling, general and administrative expenses associated with 2016 Bruker CALID and Bruker Nano Group restructuring actions.

BEST Segment operating income increased for the three months ended June 30, 2017 to $3.0 million, resulting in an operating margin of 5.6%, compared to $1.4 million, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%, for the comparable period in 2016. Operating income included $1.9 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016,

Table of Contents

respectively, of various charges for restructuring costs. Excluding these charges, non-GAAP operating margins were 9.1% and 5.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. GAAP and non-GAAP operating margins increased due to operational improvements.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016

Consolidated Results

The following table presents our results for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in millions, except per share data):

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016
Product revenue	$	664.8		$	617.9
Service revenue	130.4			124.2
Other revenue	4.6			5.0
Total revenue	799.8			747.1

Cost of product revenue	365.3			332.5
Cost of service revenue	74.4			75.4
Cost of other revenue	0.3			2.3
Total cost of revenue	440.0			410.2
Gross profit	359.8			336.9

Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative	200.9			193.6
Research and development	78.3			72.9
Other charges, net	9.5			16.0
Total operating expenses	288.7			282.5
Operating income	71.1			54.4

Interest and other income (expense), net	(9.3		)	(8.2		)
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries	61.8			46.2
Income tax (benefit) provision	16.1			7.8
Consolidated net income	45.7			38.4
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries	0.7			0.3
Net income attributable to Bruker Corporation	$	45.0		$	38.1

Net income per common share attributable to Bruker Corporation shareholders:
Basic	$	0.28		$	0.23
Diluted	$	0.28		$	0.23

Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic	159.6			162.3
Diluted	160.4			163.3

Revenue

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, our revenue increased $52.7 million, or 7.1%, to $799.8 million, compared to $747.1 million for the comparable period in 2016. Included in revenue was an increase of approximately $41.3 million from acquisitions, primarily attributable to recent acquisitions within the BEST Segment and the Bruker Nano Group, and a $14.1

Table of Contents

million decrease caused by foreign currency translation. Excluding the effects of foreign currency translation and our recent acquisitions, our organic revenue, a non-GAAP measure, increased by $25.5 million, or 3.4%.

BSI Segment revenue increased by $12.8 million, or 1.8%, to $708.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $696.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. BEST Segment revenue increased by $38.4 million, or 68.9%, to $94.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $55.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Please see the Segment Results section later in this section for additional discussion of our revenue.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $359.8 million, or 45.0% of revenue, compared to $336.9 million, or 45.1% of revenue, for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Included in gross profit were various charges for amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets and other acquisition-related costs and restructuring costs totaling $16.9 million and $15.4 million for the six months ended June 30 2017 and 2016, respectively. Excluding these charges, our non-GAAP gross profit margin for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was 47.1% and 47.2%, respectively.

Selling, General and Administrative

Our selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2017 increased to $200.9 million, or 25.1% of total revenue, from $193.6 million, or 25.9% of total revenue, for the comparable period in 2016. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was attributable to our recent acquisitions, offset in part by cost control measures put into place as part of our ongoing restructuring initiatives.

Research and Development

Our research and development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2017 increased to $78.3 million from $72.9 million for the comparable period in 2016. As a percentage of total revenue, research and development expenses remained consistent at 9.8% of total revenues.

Other Charges, Net

Other charges, net of $9.5 million recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2017 were primarily related to the BSI Segment and consisted of $3.9 million of restructuring costs related to closing facilities and implementing outsourcing and other restructuring initiatives, $2.1 million of costs associated with our global IT transformation initiative and $3.3 million of acquisition-related charges related to acquisitions completed in 2016 and 2017.

Other charges, net of $16.0 million recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2016 were all related to the BSI Segment and consisted mainly of $7.9 million of acquisition-related charges, related primarily to additional contingent consideration recognized for a recent acquisition in the Bruker Nano Group based upon an increase in forecasted revenue levels of the acquired business for the remainder of 2016, $3.6 million of restructuring costs related to closing facilities and implementing outsourcing and other restructuring initiatives and $3.9 million of costs associated with our global IT transformation initiative.

Operating Income

Operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $71.1 million, resulting in an operating margin of 8.9%, compared to operating income of $54.4 million, and an operating margin of 7.3%, for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in operating income during the six months ended June 30, 2017 was primarily the result of operational improvements, benefits from restructuring activities and our recent acquisitions.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we continued to execute on a restructuring initiative launched in 2016 which is intended to improve the Bruker CALID and Bruker Nano Groups’ operating results.

Table of Contents

Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net

Interest and other income (expense), net during the six months ended June 30, 2017 was an expense of $9.3 million compared to an expense of $8.2 million for the comparable period of 2016.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the primary components within interest and other income (expense), net was net interest expense of $7.5 million and realized and unrealized losses on foreign currency denominated transactions of $4.2 million, offset in part by proceeds from an insurance claim of $2.4 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the primary components within interest and other income (expense), net were net interest expense of $6.0 million and realized and unrealized losses on foreign currency denominated transactions of $1.6 million. The higher interest expense in 2017 was attributable to increased borrowings on our revolving credit facility to fund share repurchases and acquisitions. Unrealized foreign currency losses were caused primarily by currency exposures within the acquired OST business.

Income Tax (Benefit) Provision

The income tax provision for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $16.1 million and $7.8 million, respectively, representing effective tax rates of 26.1% and 16.9%, respectively. The Company’s first half 2016 effective tax rate reflected the benefits of certain discrete tax items in that period, including the release of valuation allowances and the recognition of previously uncertain tax benefits resulting from the closure of certain tax audits. These discrete tax items did not reoccur in the six month period ended June 30, 2017, resulting in a significantly higher effective tax rate for the first half of 2017.

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $0.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The net income attributable to noncontrolling interests represented the minority shareholders’ proportionate share of the net income recorded by our majority-owned subsidiaries.

Net Income Attributable to Bruker Corporation

Our net income for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $45.0 million, or $0.28 per diluted share, compared to $38.1 million, or $0.23 per diluted share, for the comparable period in 2016. The increase in net income was primarily caused by the increase in the operating income noted above.

Segment Results

For financial reporting purposes, we aggregate the Bruker BioSpin, Bruker CALID and Bruker Nano operating segments into the Bruker Scientific Instruments (BSI) reportable segment, which represented approximately 89% of the Company’s revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2017. This aggregation reflects these operating segments’ similar economic characteristics, production processes, service offerings, types and classes of customers, methods of distribution and regulatory environments. Our BEST Segment is our other reportable segment and represents the remainder of our revenues.

Revenue

The following table presents revenue, change in revenue and revenue growth by reportable segment (dollars in millions):

Table of Contents

	Six Months Ended June 30,								Percentage
	2017			2016			Dollar Change		Change
BSI	$	708.9		$	696.1		$	12.8	1.8	%
BEST	94.1			55.7			38.4		68.9	%
Eliminations (a)	(3.2		)	(4.7		)	1.5
	$	799.8		$	747.1		$	52.7	7.1	%

(a) Represents product and service revenue between reportable segments.

BSI Segment Revenue

BSI Segment revenue increased by $12.8 million, or 1.8%, to $708.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $696.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Revenue includes approximately $13.9 million attributable to recent acquisitions, which was largely offset by a $11.9 million decrease from the impact of foreign currency translation. Excluding the effects of foreign currency translation and our recent acquisitions, organic revenue, a non-GAAP measure, increased by $10.8 million, or 1.6%.

The Bruker BioSpin Group revenue increased during the six months ended June 30, 2017 when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016 despite a challenging comparison as the six months ended June 30, 2016 benefited from the sale of the first shielded ultra-high field one gigahertz nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) system and higher levels of high field NMR systems.

The Bruker CALID Group revenue increased during the six months ended June 30, 2017 when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016, primarily as a result of increased revenue from mass spectrometry used in academic end markets and infrared and Raman technologies used in applied end markets, offset in part by lower CBRNE revenue due to a significant contract in the six months ended June 30, 2016.

The Bruker Nano Group experienced an increase in revenue, primarily as a result of recent acquisitions and growth within the academic and industrial markets for X-ray products, offset in part by lower revenues in semiconductor metrology due to the timing of shipments.

System revenue and aftermarket revenue as a percentage of total BSI Segment revenue were as follows (dollars in millions):

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017				2016
	Revenue		Percentage of Segment Revenue		Revenue		Percentage of Segment Revenue
System revenue	$	505.6	71.3	%	$	501.5	72.0	%
Aftermarket revenue	203.3		28.7	%	194.6		28.0	%
Total revenue	$	708.9	100.0	%	$	696.1	100.0	%

BEST Segment Revenue

BEST Segment revenue increased $38.4 million, or 68.9%, to $94.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $55.7 million for the comparable period in 2016. The increase in revenue resulted from the OST acquisition, which was completed in the fourth quarter of 2016, and organic revenue growth caused by an acceleration of shipments of superconductors to large magnetic resonance imaging customers.

System and wire revenue and aftermarket revenue as a percentage of total BEST Segment revenue were as follows (dollars in millions):

Table of Contents

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017				2016
	Revenue		Percentage of Segment Revenue		Revenue		Percentage of Segment Revenue
System and wire revenue	$	92.4	98.2	%	$	54.1	97.1	%
Aftermarket revenue	1.7		1.8	%	1.6		2.9	%
Total revenue	$	94.1	100.0	%	$	55.7	100.0	%

Gross Profit and Operating Expenses

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, gross profit margin in the BSI Segment increased to 48.8% from 47.0% for the comparable period in 2016. The expansion was caused primarily by operating leverage resulting from increased revenues and operating cost improvements attributable to recent restructuring and outsourcing actions within the Bruker CALID and Bruker Nano Groups. BEST Segment gross margin decreased to 14.5% from 16.0% for the comparable period in 2016 due to the impact of the acquisition of OST.

In the six months ended June 30, 2017, selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses in the BSI Segment increased to $268.9 million, or 37.9% of segment revenue, from $258.9 million, or 37.2% of segment revenue. This increase was primarily caused by the effect of recent acquisitions in our Bruker Nano Group and Bruker CALID Group.

Selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses in the BEST Segment increased to $10.2 million, or 10.8% of segment revenue, from $7.6 million, or 13.6% of segment revenue, for the comparable period in 2016. The decrease as a percentage of revenue primarily resulted from the effect of the OST acquisition.

Operating Income

The following table presents operating income and operating margins on revenue by reportable segment (dollars in millions):

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017				2016
	Operating Income		Percentage of Segment Revenue		Operating Income		Percentage of Segment Revenue
BSI	$	68.6	9.7	%	$	51.9	7.5	%
BEST	2.5		2.7	%	1.4		2.5	%
Corporate, eliminations and other (a)	—				1.1
Total operating income	$	71.1	8.9	%	$	54.4	7.3	%

(a) Represents corporate costs and eliminations not allocated to the reportable segments.

BSI Segment operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $68.6 million, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%, compared to operating income of $51.9 million, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%, for the comparable period in 2016. Operating income included $25.7 million and $32.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, of various charges for amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets and other acquisition-related costs, restructuring costs and costs associated with our global IT transformation initiative. Excluding these charges, non-GAAP operating margins were 13.3% and 12.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. GAAP and non-GAAP operating margins increased primarily due to the gross margin improvements noted above.

BEST Segment operating income increased for the six months ended June 30, 2017 to $2.5 million, resulting in an operating margin of 2.7%, when compared to $1.4 million, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%, for the comparable period in 2016. Operating income included $4.1 million and $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, of various restructuring costs. Excluding these charges, non-GAAP operating margins were 7.0% and 2.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The GAAP and non-GAAP operating margins increase was due to

Table of Contents

the effect of the OST acquisition.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We anticipate that our existing cash and credit facilities will be sufficient to support our operating and investing needs for at least the next twelve months beyond the issuance date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Our future cash requirements could be affected by acquisitions that we may complete, repurchases of our common stock, or the payment of dividends in the future. Historically, we have financed our growth and liquidity needs through cash flow generation and a combination of debt financings and issuances of common stock. In the future, there are no assurances that additional financing alternatives will be available to us, if required, or if available, will be obtained on terms favorable to us.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, net cash provided by operating activities was $15.4 million, resulting from consolidated net income adjusted for non-cash items of $81.7 million, partially offset by an increase in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and divestitures of $66.3 million. The increase in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and divestitures for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was primarily caused by an increase in inventory for orders in 2017, partially offset by a decrease in customer advances based on timing of receipts.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, net cash provided by operating activities was $4.1 million, resulting from consolidated net income adjusted for non-cash items of $82.9 million, offset by an increase in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and divestitures of $78.8 million. The increase in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and divestitures for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was primarily caused by an increase in inventory needed to fulfill orders in the second half of 2016, the timing of customer advances received and installation and acceptance of the systems, and tax payments, including withholding tax payments made in the first quarter of 2016 related to the Company’s 2015 European cash repatriation. These uses of cash were partially offset by a decrease in accounts receivable resulting from lower revenue levels, higher than normal collection of receivables in the fourth quarter of 2015 and improvements in collections and customer credit management practices.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, net cash used in investing activities was $122.0 million, compared to net cash used in investing activities of $0.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2016. Cash used in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2017 was primarily caused by the cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, of $58.7 million; net activity of purchases and maturities of short-term investments of $49.1 million; and purchases of property, plant and equipment, net of proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment, of $14.2 million. Cash used in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2016 was primarily caused by purchases of property, plant and equipment, net of proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment of $16.3 million offset by net maturities in short-term investments of $17.0 million.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, net cash used in financing activities was $30.6 million, compared to net cash used in financing activities of $43.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2016. Net cash used in financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2017 was primarily attributable to repayment of $40.0 million of borrowings under the 2015 Credit Agreement, defined below; repayment of $20.0 million of Senior Notes, defined below; $41.7 million for the repurchase of our common stock; and $12.8 million used for the payment of dividends. These effects were offset in part by borrowings of $79.0 million under the 2015 Credit Agreement and $9.2 million proceeds from the issuance of common stock, net. Net cash used in financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2016 was primarily attributable to the repurchase of our common stock amounting to $117.6 million and for the payment of dividends amounting to $13.0 million.

In May 2017, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program (the “Repurchase Program”) under which repurchases of common stock in the amount of up to $225.0 million may occur from time to time, in amounts, at prices, and at such times as we deem appropriate, subject to market conditions, legal requirements and other considerations. A total of 1,594,930 shares were repurchased at an aggregate cost of $43.9 million as of June 30, 2017 under this Repurchase Program. The Repurchase Program will continue in 2017 and we intend to fund any additional repurchases from cash on hand, future cash flows from operations and available borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

The repurchased shares are reflected within Treasury stock in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2017.

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 totaled $440.3 million and $500.3 million, respectively, of which $414.8 million and $460.9 million, respectively, related to foreign cash and short-term investments, most significantly in the Netherlands and Switzerland.

Table of Contents

We assert that our foreign earnings, with the exception of our foreign earnings that have been previously taxed by the U.S., are indefinitely reinvested. We regularly evaluate our assertion that our foreign earnings are indefinitely reinvested. If the cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments held by our foreign subsidiaries are needed to fund operations in the United States, or we otherwise elect to repatriate the unremitted earnings of our foreign subsidiaries in the form of dividends or otherwise, or if the shares of the subsidiaries were sold or transferred, we would likely be subject to additional U.S. income taxes, net of the impact of any available tax credits, which could result in a higher effective tax rate in the future.

At June 30, 2017, we had outstanding debt totaling $430.8 million, consisting of $220.0 million outstanding under the Note Purchase Agreement described below; $210.0 million outstanding under the revolving credit line component of the 2015 Credit Agreement described below; and $1.5 million under capital lease obligations and other loans. These amounts were offset by unamortized debt issuance costs under the Note Purchase Agreement of $0.7 million. At December 31, 2016, we had outstanding debt totaling $411.7 million, consisting of $240.0 million outstanding under the Note Purchase Agreement; $171.0 million outstanding under the revolving credit line component of the prior credit agreement; and $1.5 million under capital lease obligations and other loans. These amounts were offset by unamortized debt issuance costs under the Note Purchase Agreement of $0.8 million.

The following is a summary of the maximum commitments and the net amounts available to us under the 2015 Credit Agreement and other lines of credit with various financial institutions located primarily in Germany and Switzerland that are unsecured and typically due upon demand with interest payable monthly, at June 30, 2017 (in millions):

	Weighted Average Interest Rate		Total Amount Committed by Lenders		Outstanding Borrowings		Outstanding Letters of Credit		Total Amount Available
2015 Credit Agreement	2.3	%	$	500.0	$	210.0	$	1.1	$	288.9
Other lines of credit	—		249.2		—		130.6		118.6
Total revolving lines of credit			$	749.2	$	210.0	$	131.7	$	407.5

On October 27, 2015, we entered into a revolving credit agreement, referred to as the 2015 Credit Agreement, and terminated the prior credit agreement. The 2015 Credit Agreement provides a maximum commitment on the revolving credit line of $500.0 million and a maturity date of October 2020. Borrowings under the revolving credit line of the 2015 Credit Agreement accrue interest, at the Company’s option, at either (a) the greatest of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, and (iii) adjusted LIBOR plus 1.00%, plus margins ranging from 0.00% to 0.30% or (b) LIBOR, plus margins ranging from 0.90% to 1.30%. There is also a facility fee ranging from 0.10% to 0.20%.

Borrowings under the 2015 Credit Agreement are secured by guarantees from certain material subsidiaries, as defined in the 2015 Credit Agreement. The 2015 Credit Agreement also requires us to maintain certain financial ratios related to maximum leverage and minimum interest coverage. Specifically, our leverage ratio cannot exceed 3.5 and our interest coverage ratio cannot be less than 2.5. In addition to the financial ratios, the 2015 Credit Agreement contains negative covenants, including among others, restrictions on liens, indebtedness of the Company and its subsidiaries, asset sales, dividends and transactions with affiliates. Failure to comply with any of these restrictions or covenants may result in an event of default on the 2015 Credit Agreement, which could permit acceleration of the debt and require us to prepay the debt before its scheduled due date.

As of June 30, 2017, we were in compliance with the covenants, as defined by both the 2015 Credit Agreement and the Note Purchase Agreement, as our leverage ratio was 1.46 and our interest coverage ratio was 15.0.

In January 2012, we entered into a note purchase agreement, referred to as the Note Purchase Agreement, with a group of accredited institutional investors. Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, we issued and sold $240.0 million of senior notes, referred to as the Senior Notes, which consist of the following:

· $20.0 million 3.16% Series 2012A Senior Notes, Tranche A, due January 18, 2017;

· $15.0 million 3.74% Series 2012A Senior Notes, Tranche B, due January 18, 2019;

· $105.0 million 4.31% Series 2012A Senior Notes, Tranche C, due January 18, 2022; and

Table of Contents

· $100.0 million 4.46% Series 2012A Senior Notes, Tranche D, due January 18, 2024.

On January 18, 2017, the outstanding $20.0 million principal amount of Tranche A of the Senior Notes was repaid in accordance with the terms of the Note Purchase Agreement.

As of June 30, 2017, we had approximately $40.7 million of net operating loss carryforwards available to reduce state taxable income; approximately $54.5 million of net operating losses available to reduce German federal income and trade taxes that are carried forward indefinitely; and $18.7 million of other foreign net operating losses that are expected to expire at various times beginning in 2018. We also had U.S. federal tax credits of approximately $15.1 million that expire at various dates available to offset future tax liabilities, which include research and development tax credits of $12.2 million expiring at various times through 2035, foreign tax credits of $2.9 million expiring at various times through 2024, and state research and development tax credits of $7.8 million. Utilization of these credits and state net operating losses may be subject to annual limitations due to the ownership percentage change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code Section 382 and similar state provisions. In the event of a deemed change in control under Internal Revenue Code Section 382, an annual limitation on the utilization of net operating losses and credits may result in the expiration of all or a portion of the net operating loss and credit carryforwards.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Boards (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The new standard simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating the second step of the goodwill impairment test. This ASU will be applied prospectively and is effective for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. This new standard clarifies the definition of a business and provides a screen to determine when an integrated set of assets and activities is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. This new standard will be effective as of January 1, 2018. While early adoption is permitted, we expect to adopt ASU No. 2017-01 as of the effective date. We are evaluating the provisions of this standard and have not determined what impact the adoption of ASU No. 2017-01 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Intra-Entity Transfer of Assets Other than Inventory. The new standard requires recognition of current and deferred income taxes resulting from an intra-entity transfer of any asset (excluding inventory) when the transfer occurs. This is a change from existing GAAP which prohibits recognition of current and deferred income taxes until the asset is sold to a third party. The new standard is effective as of January 1, 2018. While early adoption is permitted, we expect to adopt ASU No. 2016-16 as of the effective date. We are evaluating the provisions of this standard and have not determined what impact the adoption of ASU No. 2016-16 will have on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases. The new standard provides guidance on the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of leases. The new standard supersedes present U.S. GAAP guidance on leases and requires substantially all leases to be reported on the balance sheet as right-of-use assets and lease liabilities, as well as additional disclosures. The new standard is effective as of January 1, 2019. While early adoption is permitted, we will adopt ASU No. 2016-02 as of the effective date. We are evaluating the provisions of this standard and have not determined what impact the adoption of ASU No. 2016-02 will have on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 605. The new guidance was the result of a joint project between the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop common revenue standards for U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The core principle of the new guidance is that revenue should be recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU No. 2014-09 was originally effective prospectively for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those years. In August 2015, the FASB elected to defer the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 by one

Table of Contents

year to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early application permitted as of the original effective date. The new guidance may be applied on a retrospective basis for all prior periods presented, or on a modified retrospective basis with the cumulative effect of the new guidance as of the date of initial application. The new guidance will be effective for us as of January 1, 2018 and we currently expect to use the modified retrospective transition method.

We substantially completed the impact assessment phase of our evaluation of ASU No. 2014-09. As a result of our impact assessment, we will be implementing additional processes and controls, including additional disclosures, to comply with the new standard. The largest financial impact will relate to the timing of revenue recognition for certain project-based orders in the BEST Segment for which we currently apply the percentage-of-completion or completed contract model. Under the new guidance, there are specific criteria to determine if a performance obligation should be recognized over time or at a point in time. We expect that in some cases the revenue recognition timing under the new guidance will change from current practice based on applying the specific criteria. We have not yet quantified the impact the adoption of ASU No. 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are potentially exposed to market risks associated with changes in foreign currency, interest rates and commodity prices. We selectively use financial instruments to reduce these risks. All transactions related to risk management techniques are authorized and executed pursuant to our policies and procedures. Analytical techniques used to manage and monitor foreign currency and interest rate risk include market valuations and sensitivity analysis.

Impact of Foreign Currencies

We generate a substantial portion of our revenues in international markets, principally Germany and other countries in the European Union, Switzerland and Japan, which exposes our operations to the risk of exchange rate fluctuations. The impact of currency exchange rate movement can be positive or negative in any period. Our costs related to sales in foreign currencies are largely denominated in the same respective currencies, reducing our transaction risk exposure. However, for foreign currency denominated sales in certain regions, such as Japan, where we do not incur significant costs denominated in that foreign currency, we are more exposed to the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.

For sales not denominated in U.S. Dollars, if there is an increase in the rate at which a foreign currency is exchanged for U.S. Dollars, it will require more of the foreign currency to equal a specified amount of U.S. Dollars than before the rate increase. In such cases, if we price our products in the foreign currency, we will receive less in U.S. Dollars than we would have received before the rate increase went into effect. If we price our products in U.S. Dollars and competitors price their products in local currency, an increase in the relative strength of the U.S. Dollar could result in our prices not being competitive in a market where business is transacted in the local currency. For example, if the U.S. Dollar further strengthened against the Japanese Yen, our Japanese-based competitors would have a greater pricing advantage over us.

Changes in foreign currency translation rates decreased our revenue by 1.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and decreased our revenue by approximately 0.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries, where the functional currency is the local currency, are translated into U.S. dollars using period-end exchange rates. Revenues and expenses of foreign subsidiaries are translated at the average exchange rates in effect during the year. Adjustments resulting from financial statement translations are included as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, we recorded net gains from currency translation adjustments of $65.0 million and $15.0 million, respectively. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are reported in interest and other income (expense), net in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. Our foreign exchange losses, net were $4.2 million and $1.6 million, for the six month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

From time to time, we have entered into foreign exchange contracts designed to minimize the volatility that fluctuations in foreign currency have on our cash flows related to purchases and sales denominated in foreign currencies. Under these arrangements, we agree to purchase a fixed amount of a foreign currency in exchange for a fixed amount of U.S. Dollars or other currencies on specified dates typically with maturities of less than twelve months. These transactions are recorded at fair value with the corresponding gains and losses recorded in interest and other income (expense), net in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had foreign exchange contracts with notional amounts aggregating $107.6 million and $40.7 million, respectively. We will continue to evaluate our currency risks and in the future may utilize foreign currency contracts more frequently.

Table of Contents

Impact of Interest Rates

We regularly invest excess cash in short-term investments that are subject to changes in interest rates. We believe that the market risk arising from holding these financial instruments is minimal because of our policy of investing in short-term financial instruments issued by highly rated financial institutions.

Our exposure related to adverse movements in interest rates is derived primarily from outstanding floating rate debt instruments that are indexed to short-term market rates. We currently have approximately equal levels of fixed and floating rate debt, which limits our exposure to adverse movements in interest rates.

Impact of Commodity Prices

We are exposed to certain commodity risks associated with prices for various raw materials. The prices of copper and certain other raw materials, particularly niobium tin, used to manufacture superconductors have increased significantly over the last decade. Copper and niobium tin are the main components of low temperature superconductors and continued commodity price increases for copper and niobium as well as other raw materials may negatively affect our profitability. Periodically, we enter into commodity forward purchase contracts to minimize the volatility that fluctuations in the price of copper have on our sales of these products. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had fixed price commodity contracts with notional amounts aggregating $6.3 million and $2.7 million, respectively. We will continue to evaluate our commodity risks and may utilize commodity forward purchase contracts more frequently in the future.

Inflation

We do not believe inflation had a material impact on our business or operating results during any of the periods presented.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We have established disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and to ensure that information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2017. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at a reasonable assurance level as of June 30, 2017 due to a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting, as described below and in Part II, Item 9A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

We did not design and maintain effective internal controls over the accounting for income taxes, including the income tax provision and related tax assets and liabilities. Specifically, management did not design and maintain controls with a level of precision that would identify a material misstatement. This control deficiency resulted in immaterial errors to deferred tax assets and liabilities, income taxes payable and income tax expense accounts in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015. These errors did not, individually or in the aggregate, result in a material misstatement of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures for any periods through and including the year ended December 31, 2015. This control deficiency did not result in a misstatement of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 or the three and six month period ending June 30, 2017. However, this control deficiency could result in a misstatement of the aforementioned account balances or disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to our annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, our management determined that this control deficiency constitutes a material weakness.

Notwithstanding this material weakness, management concluded that the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition,

Table of Contents

results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Remediation Plans

During the year ended December 31, 2016, as part of our routine efforts to maintain adequate and effective internal control over financial reporting, we initiated and implemented measures designed to improve our financial statement closing process and enhance certain internal controls processes and procedures. As indicated below, a number of these initiatives relate directly to strengthening our control over accounting for income taxes and address specific control deficiencies which contributed to the material weakness. As a result of these efforts, as of the date of this filing the Company believes it has made progress toward remediating the underlying causes of the material weakness. Specifically, the Company undertook the following steps in 2016 to remediate the deficiencies underlying this material weakness:

· We augmented our tax accounting resources by adding personnel with specific international tax expertise to strengthen tax accounting review procedures in significant jurisdictions;

· We implemented procedures designed to improve the process and timeliness of tax return preparation in significant jurisdictions;

· We developed and implemented enhanced policies, procedures and controls relating to income tax account reconciliations and analysis, including enhancing our documentation to reflect the control attributes that are performed;

· We implemented accelerated and additional annual close procedures and controls during the fourth quarter of 2016 to allow for more timely issue identification and increase the frequency of review procedures and controls performed by our management around the calculation and reporting of certain tax balances;

· We identified and implemented technology improvements designed to enhance the functionality of our tax provision software to automate tasks and control workflow; and

· During the fourth quarter of 2016, we reassessed and revised the design of our tax review controls to add greater precision to help detect and prevent material misstatements.

We are committed to maintaining a strong internal control environment, and believe that these remediation efforts represent significant improvements in our control environment. The identified material weakness in internal control will not be considered fully remediated until the internal controls over these areas have been in operation for a sufficient period of time for our management to conclude that the material weakness has been fully remediated. The Company will continue its efforts to test the new controls in order to make this final determination.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2017 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, including, but not limited to, patent and commercial matters, which arise in the ordinary course of business. There are no matters pending that we currently believe are reasonably possible of having a material impact on our business or to our consolidated financial statements.

Except as described below, there have been no material developments with respect to the information previously reported under Part I, Item 3 “Legal Proceedings” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

As previously reported, the Korea Fair Trade Commission (“KFTC”) conducted an investigation into improper bidding by Bruker Korea Co., Ltd. and several other companies in connection with bids for sales of X-ray systems in 2010 and 2012. Three of the bids under investigation involved Bruker Korea. We cooperated fully with the KFTC regarding this matter. In September 2016, the KFTC fined Bruker Korea approximately $15,000 and referred the matter to the Korean Public Prosecutor’s Office (“PPO”) for criminal prosecution. On May 31, 2017, the PPO issued official notice of its decision not to pursue criminal proceedings against Bruker Korea. Additionally, since December 2016, various Korean governmental entities imposed suspensions on Bruker Korea, with overlapping suspension periods ranging from three to six months. During the

Table of Contents

periods of these suspensions, Bruker Korea was prohibited from bidding for or conducting sales to Korean governmental agencies. Sales to these customers were less than 1% of the Company’s revenue for the year ended December 31, 2016. At June 30, 2017, all such suspension periods had lapsed. We consider these matters resolved.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The following table sets forth all purchases made by or on behalf of the Company or any “affiliated purchaser,” as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act, of shares of our common stock during each month in the second quarter of 2017.

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2)	Maximum Number of Shares (or approximate dollar value) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (3)
April 1 - April 30, 2017	—	$	—	—	$	—
May 1 - May 31, 2017	604,836	26.88		525,000	210,833,775
June 1 - June 30, 2017	1,069,930	27.78		1,069,930	181,106,202
	1,674,766	$	27.46	1,594,930

(1) Includes (i) shares repurchased under a $225 million share repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors and announced on May 12, 2017 (the “Repurchase Program”), under which repurchases of common stock may occur from time to time, in amounts, at prices, and at such times as the Company deems appropriate, subject to market conditions, legal requirements and other considerations, (ii) 1,716 shares surrendered by participants under our long-term incentive plans to pay taxes upon vesting of restricted stock awards, (iii) 1,920 shares purchased in open market transactions by Frank H. Laukien, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, which purchases were previously disclosed on a Form 4 filed with the SEC on May 17, 2017, (iv) 73,000 shares purchased in open market transactions by Frank H. Laukien, which purchases were previously disclosed on a Form 4 filed with the SEC on May 19, 2017, and (v) 3,200 shares purchased in open market transactions by Frank H. Laukien, which purchases were previously disclosed on a Form 4 filed with the SEC on May 22, 2017.

(2) Represents shares repurchased under the Repurchase Program.

(3) The Repurchase Program authorizes purchases of up to $225 million of the Company’s common stock over a two-year period commencing May 12, 2017. As of June 30, 2017, shares of common stock with an aggregate cost of approximately $43.9 million have been repurchased. The remaining authorization under the Repurchase Program is $161.9 million as of August 4, 2017. The Repurchase Program expires May 11, 2019 and can be suspended, modified or terminated at any time without prior notice.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

Table of Contents

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.		Description
31.1		Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(1)
31.2		Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(1)
32.1		Certification by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(2)
101		The following materials from the Bruker Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income, (ii) the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (iv) Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(1)

(1) Filed herewith.

(2) Furnished herewith.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	BRUKER CORPORATION

Date: August 9, 2017	By:	/s/ FRANK H. LAUKIEN, PH.D.
		Frank H. Laukien, Ph.D. President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: August 9, 2017	By:	/s/ ANTHONY L. MATTACCHIONE
		Anthony L. Mattacchione Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President (Principal Financial Officer)

BRUKER CORP - FORM 10-Q - August 9, 2017

Attached files

BRUKER CORP Reports