UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017

 

Commission File Number: 001-37780

 

Randolph Bancorp, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

(781) 963-2100

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Rule 12b-2 of

the Securities Exchange act of 1934.

 

Emerging growth company ☒

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any

new or revised financial account standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of August 8, 2017, there were 5,868,544 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

 

 

 

 

---

 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

i

---

 

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements

RANDOLPH BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

1

---

 

RANDOLPH BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

2

---

 

RANDOLPH BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

 

3

---

 

RANDOLPH BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

4

---

 

RANDOLPH BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

5

---

 

RANDOLPH BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2017 and 2016

 

 

Conversion

 

Randolph Bancorp, a Massachusetts-chartered mutual holding company and the parent company of Randolph Savings Bank (the “Bank”), adopted a plan of conversion (the “Plan of Conversion”) in January 2016 which was subsequently approved by Randolph Bancorp’s Corporators in May 2016. Under the Plan of Conversion, Randolph Bancorp converted from a mutual to a stock holding company in a series of transactions in which Randolph Bancorp, Inc. (“Bancorp”), a recently formed subsidiary of Randolph Bancorp, became the surviving entity.

 

On July 1, 2016, the mutual-to-stock transaction was completed and Bancorp sold 5,686,750 shares of its common stock, representing the adjusted maximum of the offering range, at $10.00 per share, for gross proceeds of $56,867,500, including the sale of 469,498 shares to the Bank’s newly formed employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”). The ESOP’s shares were funded by a loan from Bancorp to be repaid over 25 years with interest at the prime rate.

 

The direct costs of stock offering were deducted from the proceeds of the offering and amounted to $2,325,000. In connection with the Plan of Conversion, Bancorp established The Randolph Savings Charitable Foundation, Inc. (the “Foundation”). The Foundation was funded with 181,976 shares of Bancorp’s common stock and $455,000 in cash. Bancorp recognized expense of $2,274,700 in the third quarter of 2016 for this contribution.

 

The Bancorp and the Bank are required to restrict their net worth by establishing liquidation accounts (collectively, the “liquidation account”) for the benefit of eligible account holders who continue to maintain deposit accounts at the Bank after the conversion. The liquidation account will be reduced annually to the extent eligible depositors reduce their qualifying deposits and cannot be increased thereafter with additional deposits. In the event of a complete liquidation of the Bank, each eligible account holder would be entitled to receive a distribution from the liquidation account in an amount proportionate to the adjusted qualifying account balances then held. Neither the Bancorp nor the Bank may declare or pay a cash dividend on its common stock if such dividend would cause its regulatory capital to be reduced below the amount required to maintain the liquidation account.

 

Basis of Financial Statement Presentation

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Randolph Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Randolph Savings Bank (together, the “Company”). The Bank has subsidiaries involved in owning investment securities and foreclosed real estate properties and a subsidiary which provides loan closing services. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial reporting and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, the accompanying interim financial statements do not include all information required under GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial statements, primarily consisting of normal recurring adjustments, have been included. The operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017 or any other interim period.

 

For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on

Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the SEC.

 

 

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This Update provides a revenue recognition framework for any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of non-financial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other accounting standards. This ASU, as amended by ASU 2015-14, is effective for emerging growth companies in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period with early adoption permitted. The timing of the Company’s revenue recognition is not expected to materially change. The Company's revenue

6

---

 

relates principally to financial instruments, which are explicitly excluded from the scope of the new guidance. The Company will continue to evaluate any impact as additional guidance is issued and as our internal assessment progresses.

 

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. This ASU requires lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets but recognize expenses on their income statements in a manner similar to current accounting requirements. For lessors, this ASU modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. This ASU is effective for emerging growth companies in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods therein. Earlier adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its consolidated balance sheet.

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses. The ASU sets forth a “current expected credit loss” (“CECL”) model which requires the Company to measure all expected credit losses for financial instruments held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. This replaces the existing incurred loss model and is applicable to the measurement of credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost and applies to some off-balance sheet credit exposures. This ASU requires enhanced disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand significant estimates and judgements used in determining the allowance for loan losses, as well as the credit quality and underwriting standards of an organization’s loan portfolio. In addition, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. This ASU is effective for emerging growth companies in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted in fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2018. The Company is currently assessing its data and system needs and is evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on the consolidated financial statements.

 

In April 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08 Receivables – Non-refundable Fees and Other Costs, which shortens the period of amortization of the premium on certain callable debt securities to the earliest call date. Currently, generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) excludes certain callable debt securities from consideration of early repayment of principal even if the holder is certain that the call will be exercised. As a result, upon the exercise of a call on a callable debt security held at a premium, the unamortized premium is recorded as a loss in earnings. This ASU requires that premiums on certain callable debt securities be amortized to the shortest call date. Securities within the scope of this paragraph are those that have explicit, noncontingent call features that are callable at fixed prices and on preset dates. This ASU is effective for emerging growth companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The impact of adopting this ASU is dependent on the materiality of callable debt securities at the time of adoption.

 

 

On July 1, 2016, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of First Eastern Bankshares Corporation (“First Eastern”) for cash of $14.1 million. The results of operations of First Eastern are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations beginning on July 1, 2016.

 

The following table presents selected unaudited pro forma financial information assuming the acquisition was completed on January 1, 2016. The pro forma amounts reflect adjustments related to reversal of non-recurring merger and integration costs and amortization and accretion of acquisition accounting fair value adjustments. No benefit for income taxes is included in the determination of the pro forma net loss due to the Company’s determination to establish a full valuation allowance for its deferred tax assets. The unaudited pro forma financial information does not reflect management’s estimate of any revenue enhancement opportunities or anticipated cost savings nor any adjustments related to the stock offering completed on July 1, 2016.

 

The unaudited pro forma financial information is presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the combined financial results of the Company and First Eastern had the acquisition transaction actually been completed at the beginning of the period presented, nor does it indicate future results for any interim or annual period. Pro forma basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share are not presented as such information is not being presented as part of our historical financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 due to the completion of the stock offering subsequent thereto.

Unaudited pro forma financial information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

7

---

 

Direct acquisition and merger integration costs associated with the First Eastern business combination are being expensed as incurred and are presented separately in the accompanying statements of operations. Costs incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2016 consist principally of legal and consulting fees. Costs incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2017 consist principally of severance obligations, system conversion costs and consulting fees. Additional merger integration costs are expected to be incurred through the third quarter of 2017.

 

Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income (loss).  Although certain changes in assets and liabilities are reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity, such items, along with net income (loss), are components of comprehensive income (loss).

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, included in total stockholders’ equity, are as follows:

 

 

8

---

 

The amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale, including gross unrealized gains and losses, are as follows:

 

 

9

---

 

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities by contractual maturity at June 30, 2017 are presented below.  Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

 

 

Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, follows:

 

 

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. At June 30, 2017, 28 debt securities had unrealized losses with aggregate depreciation of less than 2.3% from the Company’s amortized cost basis.  The Company currently does not believe it is probable that

10

---

 

it will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of these investments.  Therefore, it is expected that the bonds would not be settled at a price less than the par value of the investment.  Because the Company does not intend to sell any debt securities and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell any debt securities before recovery of its amortized cost basis, it does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2017. When possible, management actively monitors the credit rating of the underlying issuer of the debt security. As of June 30, 2017 management did not identify any securities for which the credit rating had deteriorated since purchase.

 

A summary of loan portfolio is as follows:

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company purchased $15.4 million in loan participations originated through a super-regional bank. These loans are to local franchisees of a major international fast food retailer and are classified with commercial and industrial loans in the accompanying table. The Company also purchased $5.0 million of refinanced student loans from an on-line lender specializing in the origination and refinancing of such loans.

11

---

 

The following table summarizes the changes in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:

 

 

12

---

 

Additional information pertaining to the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is as follows:

 

 

The following is a summary of past due and non-accrual loans at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

 

 

At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest.

 

 

13

---

 

The following is a summary of impaired loans at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

 

 

14

---

 

Additional information pertaining to impaired loans follows:

 

 

No additional funds are committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The Company periodically grants concessions to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties.

At June 30, 2017, the Company had 19 residential real estate loans and 3 commercial real estate loans aggregating $4,449,000 and $553,000, respectively, which were subject to troubled debt restructuring agreements.

At June 30, 2016, the Company had 18 residential real estate loans and 5 commercial real estate loans aggregating $4,548,000 and $1,010,000, respectively, which were subject to troubled debt restructuring agreements.

As of June 30, 2017 and 2016, $4,006,000 and $3,859,000, respectively, in troubled debt restructurings were performing in accordance with the terms of the modified loan agreements.  Included in such amounts are $997,000 and $1,729,000, respectively, that are being accounted for as non-accrual loans.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 the Company did not enter into any loan modifications meeting the criteria of a troubled debt restructuring.

15

---

 

Management performs a discounted cash flow calculation to determine the amount of valuation reserve required on each of the troubled debt restructurings.  Any reserve required is recorded as part of the allowance for loan losses. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, there were no material changes to the allowance for loan losses as a result of loan modifications made which were considered a troubled debt restructuring.

 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, there were no troubled debt restructurings that defaulted (over 30 days past due) within twelve months of the restructure date.

 

Credit Quality Information

The Company utilizes an eight-grade internal loan rating system for commercial real estate, construction and commercial loans, as follows:

Loans rated 1 – 3A are considered “pass” rated loans with low to average risk.

Loans rated 4 are considered “special mention.”  These loans are starting to show signs of potential weakness and are being closely monitored by management.

Loans rated 5 are considered “substandard” and are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligors and/or the collateral pledged.  There is a distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the weakness is not corrected.

Loans rated 6 are considered “doubtful” and have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, highly questionable and improbable.

Loans rated 7 are considered uncollectible (“loss”) and of such little value that their continuance as loans is not warranted.

On an annual basis, or more often if needed, the Company formally reviews the ratings on all commercial real estate, construction and commercial and industrial loans.  Annually, the Company engages an independent third party to review a significant portion of loans within these segments.  Management uses the results of these reviews as part of its annual review process.

The following table presents the Company’s loans by risk rating at the dates indicated:

 

 

Residential mortgages, home equity loans and lines of credit, and consumer loans are monitored for credit quality based primarily on their payment status. When one these loans becomes more than 90 days delinquent it is assigned an internal loan rating.  At June 30, 2017, $339,000 in residential mortgages and $29,000 in home equity loans were rated as substandard and $2,098,000 in residential mortgages and $370,000 in home equity loans were rated as special mention. At December 31, 2016, $890,000 in residential mortgages were rated as substandard and $1,471,000 in residential mortgages and $400,000 in home equity loans were rated as special mention.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

---

 

 

Mortgage loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The unpaid principal balances of residential mortgage loans serviced for others were $1,097,334,000 and $1,046,551,000 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

 

The following table summarizes the activity relating to mortgage servicing rights for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):

 

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded a partial reversal of the valuation allowance for its mortgage servicing rights of $231,000 due to an increase in fair value caused by lower expected loan prepayments.

 

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded a deferred income tax benefit of $280,000 and $0, respectively, and current state tax expense of $3,000 in each period. The deferred income tax benefit for the 2017 period resulted from, and was limited to, an offsetting tax provision attributable to other comprehensive income, specifically, appreciation in the fair value of available-for-sale securities.

 

Since 2014, the Company has maintained a valuation allowance for all of its deferred tax assets based on a determination that it was more likely than not that such assets would not be realized. This determination was based on the Company’s net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforward position, its current period operating results exclusive of non-recurring items and its expectations for the upcoming year. In performing subsequent assessments, management has concluded that no significant changes in the key factors affecting the realizability of the deferred tax asset has occurred and that a valuation allowance for all deferred tax assets should be maintained.

 

Derivative Loan Commitments

Mortgage loan commitments qualify as derivative loan commitments if the loan that will result from exercise of the commitment will be held for sale upon funding.  The Company enters into commitments to fund residential mortgage loans at specified rates and times in the future, with the intention that these loans will subsequently be sold in the secondary market.

Outstanding derivative loan commitments expose the Company to the risk that the price of the loans arising from exercise of the loan commitment might decline from inception of the rate lock to funding of the loan due to an increase in mortgage interest rates.  If interest rates increase, the value of these loan commitments decreases.  Conversely, if interest rates decrease, the value of these loan commitments increases.  The notional amount of derivative loan commitments was $42,901,000 and $32,904,000 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.  The fair value of such commitments was an asset of $538,000 and $617,000 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and is included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

Forward Loan Sale Commitments

The Company utilizes both “mandatory delivery” and “best efforts” forward loan sale commitments to mitigate the risk of potential decreases in the values of loans that would result from the exercise of the derivative loan commitments.

17

---

 

With a “mandatory delivery” contract, the Company commits to deliver a certain principal amount of mortgage loans to an investor at a specified price on or before a specified date.  If the Company fails to deliver the amount of mortgages necessary to fulfill the commitment by the specified date, it is obligated to pay a “pair-off” fee, based on then-current market prices, to the investor to compensate the investor for the shortfall.

With a “best efforts” contract, the Company commits to deliver an individual mortgage loan of a specified principal amount and quality to an investor if the loan to the underlying borrower closes.  Generally, the price the investor will pay the seller for an individual loan is specified prior to the loan being funded (e.g. on the same day the lender commits to lend funds to a potential borrower). The Company does not account for best efforts contracts as derivative instruments, as such contracts do not require payment of a pair-off fee if the underlying mortgage loan does not close.

 

The Company expects that these forward loan sale commitments will experience inverse changes in fair value to the change in fair value of derivative loan commitments. The notional amount of mandatory delivery forward loan sale commitments was $21,445,000 and $18,197,000 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The fair value of certain of these commitments was an asset of $69,000 and $65,000 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and is included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets while the fair value of other such commitments was a liability of $18,000 and $47,000 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and is included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

 

 

In connection with our mutual-to-stock conversion and stock offering, the Company established an employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP) which acquired 469,498 shares of the Company’s common stock equaling 8% of the shares issued, including shares issued to the Foundation. The ESOP is a tax-qualified retirement plan providing employees the opportunity to own Company stock. Company contributions to the ESOP are allocated to eligible participants on the basis of compensation, subject to federal tax limits. The number of shares to be allocated annually is 18,780 through 2040.

 

Shares are committed to be released on a monthly basis and allocated as of December 31 each year. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017, 4,695 shares and 9,390 shares, respectively, were committed to be released, resulting in compensation expense, based on the fair value of the Company’s stock, of $73,000 and $145,000, respectively. The fair value of the 441,328 unallocated shares at June 30, 2017 was $7,017,100.

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share represents net income (loss) divided by the weighted average of common shares outstanding during the period. Unallocated ESOP shares are not considered to be outstanding for purposes of computing earnings (loss) per share. There were no potentially dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding at June 30, 2017.

 

The cost of shares issued to the ESOP, but not yet allocated or committed to be released to participants, is shown as a reduction of stockholders’ equity. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the weighted average number of outstanding shares totaled 5,868,709 and 5,868,717, respectively. The average of unallocated and uncommitted ESOP shares for the three and six months periods ended June 30, 2017 totaled 443,676 and 446,023, respectively, resulting in a total of 5,425,033 and 5,422,694 shares, respectively, being used to compute basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share. As shares were not outstanding during the first six months of 2016 earnings per share is not presented for this period.

 

Determination of fair value

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures.  Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices.  However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various assets and liabilities.  In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques.  Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows.  Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the asset or liability.

 

Effective July 1, 2016, the Company elected the fair value option pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 825, “Financial Instruments” for its residential mortgage loans being held for sale in the secondary market. ASC 825 allows for the irrevocable option to elect fair value accounting for the initial and subsequent measurement for certain financial assets and liabilities on a contract-by-contract basis that may otherwise not be required to be measured at fair value under other accounting standards. The

18

---

 

Company elected the fair value option to better match changes in fair values of the loans with changes in the fair value of the forward loan sale commitments which are used to economically hedge them against changes in interest rates between the time an interest rate lock agreement is entered into with the borrower and the time the completed loan is sold. The aggregate fair value of the loans held for sale, the contractual balance of loans held for sale and the gain on loans held for sale totaled $32.0 million, $31.3 million and $703,000, respectively, at June 30, 2017. The gain on loans held for sale is reported as a component of net gain on sales of mortgage loans in the accompanying statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

 

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair value disclosures:

Cash and cash equivalents – The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments approximate fair values based on the short-term nature of the assets.

Certificates of deposit – Certificates of deposit are carried at cost. These assets are measured at fair value in level 2 based on pricing models that consider standard input factors such as observable market data, benchmark yields, interest rate volatilities, broker/dealer quotes, credit spreads and new issue data.

Securities – All fair value measurements are obtained from a third-party pricing service and are not adjusted by management.  The securities measured at fair value in Level 1 (none at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016) are based on quoted market prices in an active exchange market.  Securities measured at fair value in Level 2 are based on pricing models that consider standard input factors such as observable market data, benchmark yields, interest rate volatilities, broker/dealer quotes, credit spreads and new issue data.

Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (“FHLBB”) stock – It is not practical to determine the fair value of FHLBB stock due to restrictions on its transferability.

 

Loans held for sale – Fair values are based on commitments in effect from investors or prevailing market prices and include the servicing value of the loans.

Loans – For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values.  Fair values for other loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using market interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.  Fair values for non-performing loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses or underlying collateral values, where applicable.

Mortgage servicing rights – Fair value is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income, using various assumptions related to fees, discount rates and prepayment speeds.

Deposit liabilities – The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and non-interest checking, passbook savings, and money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts).  Fair values for fixed-rate term certificates are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies market interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities.

FHLBB advances - The fair values of the Company’s FHLBB advances are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the current incremental borrowing rates in the market for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Accrued interest - The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.

On-balance-sheet derivatives - Fair values of forward loan sale commitments and derivative loan commitments are based on fair values of the underlying mortgage loans based on current market prices for similar assets in the secondary market. For derivative loan commitments, fair values also include the value of servicing, deferred origination fees/costs and the probability of such commitments being exercised.

Off-balance sheet credit-related instruments - Fair values for off-balance-sheet, credit-related financial instruments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing.  The fair values of these instruments are not material.

19

---

 

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below.   

 

 

Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis

The Company may also be required, from time to time, to measure certain other assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.  These adjustments to fair value usually result from application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.  The following table summarizes the fair value hierarchy used to determine each adjustment and the carrying value of the related assets as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

 

 

 

 

 

20

---

 

The fair value of properties associated with collateral dependent impaired loans are based on recent appraisals for which no discounts were applied.

 

The Company recorded a partial reversal of the valuation allowance for its mortgage servicing rights of $231,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2017, due to an increase in fair value caused by lower expected loan prepayments.

There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

 

Summary of fair values of financial instruments

 

The estimated fair values, and related carrying amounts, of the Company’s financial instruments are presented below.  Certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments are exempt from disclosure requirements.  Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented herein do not represent the underlying fair value of the Company. This table excludes financial instruments for which the carrying amount approximates fair value. Financial assets for which the fair value approximates carrying value include cash and cash equivalents, and accrued interest receivable. Financial liabilities for which the fair value approximates carrying value include mortgagors’ escrow accounts and accrued interest payable.

 

 

 

 

Loan commitments

 

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of market, credit and interest rate risk which are not recognized in the consolidated financial statements.

 

The Company’s exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of these commitments. The Company uses the same

credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.

21

---

 

 

 

 

The following financial instruments were outstanding, at the dates indicated, whose contract amounts represent credit risk:

 

 

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The commitments for lines of credit may expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The majority of these financial instruments are collateralized by real estate.

 

At June 30, 2017, we had $52.3 million in loan commitments outstanding, including $42.9 million related to loans to be sold in the secondary mortgage market and for which the Company had $30.8 million in forward loan sale commitments from investors.

 

Lease commitments

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company entered into a non-cancelable lease related to its lending center in Andover, MA. This lease has an initial lease term of five years, with an option to extend for an additional period of five years.

 

In addition, the Company entered into a non-cancelable lease with a five-year initial lease term and two five-year renewal options for a new branch office in Braintree, MA. This branch is not expected to open until the first quarter of 2018, at which time customers of our North Randolph, MA branch are expected to be transferred to this new branch location.

 

The aggregate future minimum rent commitment associated with these leases was $2.5 million as of June 30, 2017.

 

Other contingencies

 

We are not currently a party to any pending legal proceedings that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

 

On July 31, 2017, the Company sold the servicing rights to a portfolio of $379 million of residential mortgage loans to a third party. All required approvals necessary to complete this transaction have been received. Under the terms of the purchase and sale agreement, the Company received 70% of the selling price, which amounted to $2.4 million, on the sale date. The final selling price will be adjusted for loan prepayments through November 30, 2017. The Company expects the ultimate net gain or loss on this sale to be insignificant. The actual transfer of servicing is scheduled to occur in September 2017.

22

---

 

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

This section is intended to help investors understand the financial performance of Randolph Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary through a discussion of the factors affecting its financial condition at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and its results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. This section should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of Randolph Bancorp, Inc. and notes thereto that appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. For the purpose of this Quarterly Report, the terms the “Company” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to Randolph Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary unless the context indicates another meaning.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains statements that may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain current assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, can generally be identified by the use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “plan,” “potential,” “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “target” and similar expressions. These statements include, among others, statements regarding our strategy, goals and expectations; evaluations of future interest rate trends and liquidity; expectations as to growth in assets, deposits and results of operations, future operations, market position and financial position; and prospects, plans and objectives of management. You should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. You should exercise caution in interpreting and relying on forward-looking statements because they are subject to significant risks, uncertainties and other factors which are, in some cases, beyond our control.

 

Forward-looking statements are based on the current assumptions and beliefs of management and are only expectations of future results. Our actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of, among others, factors referenced herein under the section captioned “Risk Factors”; adverse conditions in the capital and debt markets and the impact of such conditions on our business activities; changes in interest rates; competitive pressures from other financial institutions; the effects of weakness in general economic conditions on a national basis or in the local markets in which we operate, including changes that adversely affect borrowers’ ability to service and repay our loans; changes in the value of securities in our investment portfolio; changes in loan default and charge-off rates; fluctuations in real estate values; the adequacy of loan loss reserves; decreases in deposit levels necessitating increased borrowing to fund loans and investments; changes in government regulation; changes in accounting standards and practices; the risk that intangible assets recorded in our financial statements will become impaired; demand for loans in our market area; our ability to attract and maintain deposits; risks related to the implementation of acquisitions, dispositions, and restructurings; the risk that we may not be successful in the implementation of our business strategy; and changes in assumptions used in making such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made.

 

Overview

Our results of operations depend primarily on net interest income and gains on the sale of mortgage loans. Net interest income is the difference between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning assets and the interest we pay on interest-bearing liabilities. Our interest-earning assets consist primarily of residential mortgage loans, commercial real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, home equity loans and lines of credit, construction loans, consumer loans and investment securities. Interest-bearing liabilities consist primarily of deposit accounts and borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (“FHLBB”). Gains on the sale of mortgage loans result from the sale of such loans in the secondary mortgage market. The amount of these gains is dependent on the volume of our loan originations.

 

Completion of Stock Offering and Acquisition of First Eastern Bankshares Corporation

 

On July 1, 2016, the Company completed its mutual-to-stock conversion and stock offering receiving net proceeds of $49.8 million. Immediately thereafter, we consummated the acquisition of First Eastern Bankshares Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary First Federal Savings Bank of Boston (together, “First Eastern”) at a cost of $14.1 million.

 

First Eastern’s primary business was the origination and sale of residential mortgage loans in the secondary market and offering a variety of insured deposit accounts and using such deposits as well as borrowings to originate portfolio loans, primarily residential mortgage and construction loans, to its customers. As a result of the acquisition, our footprint expanded to include a branch office in downtown Boston, five loan production offices and a lending center in Massachusetts and one loan production office in New Hampshire.

23

---

 

 

See Notes 1 and 3 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for additional information related to these transactions.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Certain of our accounting policies are important to the presentation of our financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates associated with these policies are susceptible to material changes as a result of changes in facts and circumstances. Facts and circumstances which could affect these judgments include, but are not limited to, changes in interest rates, changes in the performance of the economy and changes in the financial condition of borrowers. Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

The JOBS Act contains provisions that, among other things, reduce certain reporting requirements for qualifying public companies. As an “emerging growth company” we have elected to use the extended transition period to delay adoption of new or revised accounting pronouncements applicable to public companies until such pronouncements are made applicable to private companies. Accordingly, our consolidated financial statements may not be comparable to the financial statements of public companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards.

 

Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016

 

Total Assets. Total assets increased $26.7 million to $507.9 million at June 30, 2017 from $481.2 million at December 31, 2016.  Growth was concentrated in our loan portfolio, which increased by $32.0 million. The overall asset growth was funded primarily by an increase in deposits of $17.4 million and FHLBB advances of $9.8 million.

 

Loans Held for Sale. We are actively involved in the secondary mortgage market and designate a significant majority of our residential first mortgage loan production for sale. At June 30, 2017, loans held for sale, which consist of closed residential first mortgage loans which we have committed to sell to investors, totaled $32.0 million compared to $30.5 million at December 31, 2016. This increase of $1.5 million is indicative of the greater volume of origination activity which occurs in the Spring selling season for homes.

Net Loans. Net loans increased $32.0 million to $365.0 million at June 30, 2017 from $333.0 million at December 31, 2016. This net growth occurred primarily as a result of an increase of $19.7 million in commercial and industrial and consumer loans. During the first half of 2017, the Company purchased $15.4 million in loan participations originated through a super-regional bank. These commercial and industrial loans are with local franchisees of a major international fast food retailer. In addition, the Company purchased $6.7 million in consumer loans during this period including $5.0 million of refinanced student loans from an on-line lender specializing in the origination and refinancing of such loans. The remaining net growth of $12.4 million is due to organic growth across all categories of real estate loans lead by commercial real estate loans which increased by $4.6 million to $93.0 million at June 30, 2017. The growth in commercial real estate lending reflects continuing strong local market conditions aided by the favorable interest rate environment that prevailed throughout the period.

Investment Securities. Investment securities, all of which are classified as available for sale, decreased $1.5 million to $67.1 million at June 30, 2017 from $68.6 million at December 31, 2016. At June 30, 2017, investment securities represented 13.2% of total assets compared to 14.3% at December 31, 2016. This decrease is a consequence of our strategic shift to investing a higher proportion of interest-earning assets in loans.

Mortgage Servicing Rights. Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) increased $506,000 to $9.0 million at June 30, 2017 from $8.5 million at December 31, 2016. This increase was primarily due new originations, net of amortization, of $275,000 during the first half of the year and a $231,000 reversal of the valuation allowance. This reversal resulted from an increase in the fair value of MSRs due to slower projected loan prepayment speeds. We serviced $1.1 billion in loans for others at June 30, 2017. In July 2017, the Company agreed to sell the rights to service $379 million of loans consistent with its strategic intent to manage the size of the loan servicing portfolio due to regulatory capital considerations.

Deposits. Deposits increased $17.4 million, or 5.0%, to $368.6 million at June 30, 2017 from $351.2 million at December 31, 2016. This growth occurred in business related non-maturity deposit accounts, including a $10.2 million increase in noninterest-bearing accounts.

FHLBB Advances. FHLBB advances increased $9.8 million to $48.5 million at June 30, 2017 from $38.7 million at December 31, 2016 to help fund loan growth. This increase consisted entirely of overnight advances.

24

---

 

Stockholders’ Equity. Stockholders’ equity was $83.3 million at both June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 as the net loss for the first half of 2017 of $597,000 was fully offset by appreciation in the fair value of available-for-sale securities and equity adjustments offsetting the expense of the employee stock ownership plan. The appreciation in the fair value of investment securities was caused by lower long-term interest rates during the first half of 2017.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

General. Operating results for the three months ended June 30, 2017 include First Eastern, which was acquired on July 1, 2016, while operating results for the three months ended June 30, 2016, do not include First Eastern. Separate operating results for First Eastern for the three months ended June 30, 2017 are not available due to a conversion of systems that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2016.

The Company incurred a net loss of $150,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to net income of $718,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2016. Operating results for both periods were affected by merger and integration costs related to the acquisition of First Eastern and amounted to $357,000 and $33,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  In addition, the operating results for the three months ended June 30, 2016 included a life insurance settlement gain of $486,000. These non-core items and their financial impact are summarized in the table presented on page 33 under the caption “Non- GAAP Measures.”  

Analysis of Net Interest Income

Net interest income represents the difference between income we earn on our interest-earning assets and the expense we pay on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income depends on the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest rates earned on such assets and paid on such liabilities.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

---

 

Average Balances and Yields. The following tables set forth average balance sheets, average yields and costs, and certain other information for the periods indicated. All average balances are daily average balances. The yields set forth below include the effect of acquisition accounting adjustments (2017 only) as well as deferred fees, discounts and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income or expense.

 

 

 

26

---

 

Rate/Volume Analysis. The following table presents the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income, presented on a tax equivalent basis, for the periods indicated. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The net column represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.

 

Interest and Dividend Income. Interest and dividend income, inclusive of tax equivalent adjustments on municipal securities, increased $912,000, or 27.6%, to $4.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $3.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. This increase was due to the both the investment of IPO proceeds of $49.8 million and the acquisition of First Eastern, which contributed to an increase in average interest-earning assets of $81.4 million between periods. The yield on interest-earning assets increased 17 basis points to 3.67% in the 2017 quarter from 3.50% in the same quarter of the prior year due principally to the higher proportion of loans to total interest-earning assets and a 10 basis points increase in the yield on loans.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $97,000, or 25.0%, to $485,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $388,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2016. This increase principally reflects growth in the average balance of FHLBB advances of $10.3 million and a 10 basis points increase to 0.58% in cost of funds. The increase in cost of funds was due to a 6 basis points increase in the cost of interest-bearing deposits caused by selective increases in the rates paid on certain deposit products in response to market conditions and a 28 basis points increase in the cost of FHLBB advances caused by Federal Reserve Board increases in the federal funds rate beginning in December 2016.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $815,000, or 27.9%, to $3.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $2.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. This improvement resulted principally from the 2016 stock offering, which was used to fund loan growth, and a $23.2 million increase in the average balance of noninterest-bearing deposits. The net interest margin increased in the second quarter of 2017 to 3.25% from 3.09% in the second quarter of 2016 due primarily to an increase in the ratio of interest-earning assets to 137.3% in the 2017 period compared to 118.0% in the 2016 period. This improvement was caused by both the deployment of the IPO proceeds and the increase in the average balance of noninterest-bearing deposits between periods.

Provision for Loan Losses. Based on the application of our loan loss methodology, we recorded a provision for loan losses of $100,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 while no provision was recorded in the prior year period. Classified and nonaccrual loan balances were stable during the quarter with regional and local economic data, including housing prices, continuing their positive trend of the past several years. The provision in the second quarter of 2017 primarily reflected portfolio growth in both real estate and non-real estate secured loans. The allowance for loan losses was at 0.97% of total loans at June 30, 2017 compared to 0.98% at December 31, 2016, and was 159.1% of non-performing loans at June 30, 2017 compared to 147.2% at December 31, 2016.

27

---

 

Net Gain on Sales of Mortgage Loans. The net gain on sales of mortgage loans increased $1.5 million to $2.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $1.1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2016. During the three months ended June 30, 2017, we sold $99.9 million of residential mortgage loans compared to $33.8 million of such loans in the three months ended June 30, 2016. These increases are due to the acquisition of First Eastern. Loan originations in 2017 continue to be adversely affected by a lower volume of loan refinancing activity than we experienced in the prior year and a shortage of homes being marketed for sale. Through June 30, 2017, 73% of our loan originations funded home purchases and 27% funded the refinancing of loans. For all of 2016, loan refinancing activity accounted for 45% of total originations.

Other Non-interest Income. Non-interest income, excluding the net gain on the sales of mortgage loans, decreased $114,000 to $914,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $1.0 million during the same quarter of the prior year. During the second quarter of 2016, we recognized a gain of $486,000 on a life insurance settlement. Exclusive of this non-recurring item, other non-interest income would have increased $372,000, principally due to an increase of $221,000 in loan servicing income. The First Eastern acquisition resulted in a near tripling of serviced loans causing this increase. Also contributing to the increase in other non-interest income was $112,000 in fees generated by a subsidiary acquired in the acquisition of First Eastern which provides loan closing services.

 

Non-interest Expenses. Non-interest expenses increased $3.2 million and amounted to $7.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $4.2 million for the same period in 2016.  This increase is due in large part to the acquisition of First Eastern. Most expense categories experienced increases resulting from this transaction, the most significant of which was salaries and employee benefits, which increased $2.3 million, or 98.0%, during the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016. The Company doubled the number of employees as a result of this acquisition. Also contributing to this increase was a $740,000, or 193.2%, increase in commission expense associated with the growth in loan originations resulting from this acquisition.

 

Occupancy and equipment expenses increased $256,000, or 70.5%, in the second quarter of 2017 compared to the same quarter in the prior year. This increase is due to additional rent expense and related property costs associated with First Eastern’s lending center and loan production offices.

 

Data processing expenses increased $48,000, or 36.6%, in the second quarter of 2017 compared to the same quarter of the prior year. This increase is due to the acquisition of First Eastern as both quarterly periods reflected revised pricing from the Company’s core data processor that went into effect in March 2016.

 

During the second quarter of 2016, the Company recognized a $150,000 write-down in the carrying value of a commercial building on which it had foreclosed. This building, which was the only foreclosed real estate owned by the Company during the past three years, was sold in the fourth quarter of 2016.

 

We incurred merger and integration costs directly attributable to the First Eastern acquisition of $357,000 and $33,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Costs incurred in the 2017 period were for severance payments, conversion costs for the loan origination system and consulting fees. Costs incurred in the 2016 period were primarily for consulting fees in preparation for the integration of operations with First Eastern. The final phase of merger integration involves the loan servicing system with conversion scheduled for the third quarter of 2017.

 

Other non-interest expenses increased $233,000, or 32.6%, in the second quarter of 2017 compared to the same quarter of the prior year. This increase is primarily due to the acquisition of First Eastern.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit). A deferred tax benefit of $254,000 was recognized for the three months ended June 30, 2017, while no benefit for income taxes was recognized for the three months ended June 30, 2016. State income taxes of $3,000 were provided during the 2016 period while no such taxes were provided in the 2017 period. The deferred tax benefit resulted from, and was limited to, an offsetting tax provision attributable to other comprehensive income, specifically, appreciation in the fair value of available-for-sale securities. The Company continues to maintain a full valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

General. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2017 include First Eastern, which was acquired on July 1, 2016, while operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2016, do not include First Eastern. Separate operating results for First Eastern for the six months ended June 30, 2017 are not available due to a conversion of systems that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2016.

28

---

 

The Company incurred a net loss of $597,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to net income of $720,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Operating results for both periods were affected by merger and integration costs related to the acquisition of First Eastern and amounted to $524,000 and $150,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  In addition, the operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2016 included a life insurance settlement gain of $486,000. These non-core items and their financial impact are summarized in the table presented on page 33 under the caption “Non- GAAP Measures.”

Analysis of Net Interest Income

Net interest income represents the difference between income we earn on our interest-earning assets and the expense we pay on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income depends on the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest rates earned on such assets and paid on such liabilities.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29

---

 

Average Balances and Yields. The following tables set forth average balance sheets, average yields and costs, and certain other information for the periods indicated. All average balances are daily average balances. Non-accrual loans were included in the computation of average balances. The yields set forth below include the effect of deferred fees, discounts and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income or expense.

 

 

 

30

---

 

Rate/Volume Analysis. The following table presents the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income, presented on a tax equivalent basis, for the periods indicated. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The net column represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.

 

 

Interest and Dividend Income. Interest and dividend income, inclusive of tax equivalent adjustments on municipal securities, increased $1.6 million, or 25.2%, to $8.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $6.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. This increase was due to the both the investment of IPO proceeds of $49.8 million and the acquisition of First Eastern, which contributed to an increase in average interest-earning assets of $79.0 million between periods. The yield on interest-earning assets increased 11 basis points to 3.63% in the first six months of 2017 from 3.52% in the same six months of the prior year due principally to the higher proportion of loans to total interest-earning assets and a 8 basis points increase in the yield on loans.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $122,000, or 16.0%, to $885,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $763,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016. This increase principally reflects growth in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits of $10.3 million and a 5 basis points increase to 0.54% in cost of funds. The increase in cost of funds was due to a 4 basis points increase in the cost of interest-bearing deposits caused by selective increases in the rates paid on certain deposit products in response to market conditions and a 27 basis points increase in the cost of FHLBB advances caused by Federal Reserve Board increases in the federal funds rate beginning in December 2016.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $1.5 million, or 26.4%, to $7.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $5.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. This improvement resulted principally from the 2016 stock offering, which was used to fund loan growth, and a $23.4 million increase in the average balance of noninterest-bearing deposits. The net interest margin increased in the first half of 2017 to 3.24% from 3.11% in the first half of 2016 due primarily to an increase in the ratio of interest-earning assets to 137.7% in the 2017 period compared to 117.8% in the 2016 period. This improvement was caused by both the deployment of the of the IPO proceeds and the increase in the average balance of noninterest-bearing deposits between periods.

Provision for Loan Losses. Based on the application of our loan loss methodology, we recorded a provision for loan losses of $335,000 and $62,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Classified and nonaccrual loan balances were stable during the first half of 2017 with regional and local economic data, including housing prices, continuing their positive trend of the past several years. The provision in the first half of 2017 primarily reflected portfolio growth in both real estate and non-real estate

31

---

 

secured loans. The allowance for loan losses was at 0.97% of total loans at June 30, 2017 compared to 0.98% at December 31, 2016, and was 159.1% of non-performing loans at June 30, 2017 compared to 147.2% at December 31, 2016.

Net Gain on Sales of Mortgage Loans. The net gain on sales of mortgage loans increased $2.8 million to $4.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $1.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016. During the first half of 2017, we sold $199.8 million of residential mortgage loans compared to $58.9 million of such loans in the three months ended June 30, 2016. These increases are due to the acquisition of First Eastern. Loan originations in 2017 continue to be adversely affected by a lower volume of loan refinancing activity than we experienced in the prior year and a shortage of homes being marketed for sale. Through June 30, 2017, 73% of our loan originations funded home purchases and 27% funded the refinancing of loans. For all of 2016, loan refinancing activity accounted for 45% of total originations.

Other Non-interest Income. Non-interest income, excluding the net gain on the sales of mortgage loans, increased $637,000 to $2.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $1.6 million during the same period of the prior year. During the second quarter of 2016, we recognized a gain of $486,000 on a life insurance settlement. Exclusive of this non-recurring item, other non-interest income would have increased $1.1 million principally due to an increase of $781,000 in loan servicing income. The First Eastern acquisition resulted in a near tripling of serviced loans leading to this increase. Also contributing to the increase in loan servicing income was a $231,000 partial reversal of the valuation allowance for mortgage servicing rights due to an increase in their fair value attributable to slower loan prepayment speeds. Non-interest income was also positively affected by $213,000 in fees generated by a subsidiary acquired in the acquisition of First Eastern which provides loan closing services.

 

Non-interest Expenses. Non-interest expenses increased $6.3 million and amounted to $14.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $8.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016.  This increase is due in large part to the acquisition of First Eastern. Most expense categories experienced increases resulting from this transaction, the most significant of which was salaries and employee benefits, which increased $4.8 million, or 104.9%, during the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016. The Company doubled the number of employees as a result of this acquisition. Also contributing to this increase was a $1.3 million, or 207.1%, increase in commission expense associated with the growth in loan originations resulting from this acquisition.

 

Occupancy and equipment expenses increased $518,000, or 68.4%, in the first half of 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase is due to additional rent expense and related property costs associated with First Eastern’s lending center and loan production offices.

 

Data processing expenses decreased $25,000, or 6.5%, in the first half of 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year. This decrease is due to revised pricing from the Company’s core data processor that went into effect in March 2016, partially offset by additional costs associated with First Eastern. All of First Eastern’s data processing systems have been converted to the Company’s systems except for the residential loan servicing system, which is scheduled for the third quarter of 2017.

 

During the second quarter of 2016, the Company recognized a $150,000 write-down in the carrying value of a commercial building on which it had foreclosed. This building, which was the only foreclosed real estate owned by the Company during the past three years, was sold in the fourth quarter of 2016.

 

We incurred merger and integration costs directly attributable to the First Eastern acquisition of $524,000 and $150,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Costs incurred in the 2017 period were for severance payments, conversion costs for the loan origination system and consulting fees. Costs incurred in the 2016 period were primarily for legal fees and integration consulting fees. The final phase of merger integration involves the loan servicing system with conversion scheduled for the third quarter of 2017.

 

Other non-interest expenses increased $582,000, or 44.1%, in the first half of 2017 compared to the period in the prior year. This increase is primarily due to the acquisition of First Eastern.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit). A deferred tax benefit of $280,000 was recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2017, while no benefit for income taxes was recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2016. State income taxes of $3,000 were provided during both the 2017 and 2016 periods. The deferred tax benefit resulted from, and was limited to, an offsetting tax provision attributable to other comprehensive income, specifically, appreciation in the fair value of available-for-sale securities. The Company continues to maintain a full valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets.

 

32

---

 

Non-GAAP Measures

 

Management assesses the Company’s financial performance for purposes of making day-to-day and strategic decisions, it does so based upon the performance of its core banking business which is derived from the combination of net interest income and non-interest income reduced by the provision for loan losses and non-interest expenses and the impact of income taxes, if any, all as adjusted for any non-core items. The Company’s financial reporting is determined in accordance with GAAP, which sometimes includes items that management believes are unrelated to its core banking business and are not expected to have a material financial impact on operating results in future periods, such as merger and integration costs, life insurance settlements and other items. Management computes the Company’s non-GAAP operating earnings, non-interest income as a percentage of total income and the efficiency ratio on an operating basis, which excludes these items, in order to measure the performance of the Company’s core banking business.

 

Non-GAAP measures should not be viewed as a substitute for operating results determined in accordance with GAAP. An item that management determines to be non-core and excludes when computing these non-core measures can be of substantial importance to the Company’s results for any particular reporting period. The Company’s non-GAAP performance measures are not necessarily comparable to such measures that may be used by other companies.

 

The following table summarizes the impact of non-core items recorded for the reporting periods indicated below and reconciles them in accordance with GAAP:

 

 

Asset Quality

Nonperforming Assets. The following table provides information with respect to our nonperforming assets, including troubled debt restructurings, at the dates indicated. We did not have any accruing loans past due 90 days or more at the dates presented.

 

 

33

---

 

Interest income that would have been recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2017 had nonaccruing loans been current according to their original terms amounted to $52,000. Income related to nonaccrual loans included in interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2017 amounted to $45,000.

Classified Loans.  The following table shows the aggregate amounts of our regulatory classified loans at the dates indicated.

 

 

None of the special mention loans at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were on nonaccrual.

Other than as disclosed in the above tables, there are no other loans where management has information indicating that there is serious doubt about the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms.

Delinquencies. The following table provides information about delinquencies in our loan portfolio at the dates indicated.

 

 

Allowance for Loan Losses. The following table sets the breakdown for loan losses by loan category at the dates indicated.

 

 

34

---

 

The following table sets forth an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated.

 

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2017, we had $48.5 million of FHLBB advances outstanding. At that date, we had the ability to borrow up to an additional $64.2 million from the FHLBB and $3.5 million under a line of credit with a correspondent bank.

Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents. The level of these assets is dependent on our operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. At June 30, 2017, cash and cash equivalents totaled $8.8 million.  

Financing activities consist primarily of activity in deposit accounts and borrowings. Deposit flows are affected by the overall level of interest rates, the interest rates and products offered by us and our local competitors, and by other factors. We experienced a net increase in deposits of $17.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

At June 30, 2017, we had $52.3 million in loan commitments outstanding, including $42.9 million related to loans to be sold in the secondary mortgage market and for which the Company had $30.8 million in forward loan sale commitments from investors. In addition to commitments to originate loans, we had $37.9 million in unused lines of credit to borrowers and letters of credit, $10.9 million in undisbursed construction loans and $4.6 million under a master loan participation agreement. We anticipate that we will have sufficient funds available to meet our current loan origination commitments. Certificates of deposit that are scheduled to mature in less than one year from June 30, 2017 totaled $52.7 million. Management expects, based on historical experience, that a substantial portion of the maturing certificates of deposit will be renewed.

35

---

 

We are subject to various regulatory capital requirements, including a risk-based capital measure. At June 30, 2017, our Tier 1 capital to average assets ratio was 16.71%. We exceeded all regulatory capital requirements and were considered “well capitalized” under regulatory guidelines.

 

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

The Company is not required to disclose quantitative and qualitative information about market risk as it qualifies as a smaller reporting company.

 

 

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures.

An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of June 30, 2017. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2017, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

The Company is not involved in any material pending litigation.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

 

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the heading “Risk Factors.” The Company’s evaluation of its risk factors has not changed materially since those discussed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36

---

 

Item 6. Exhibits.

 

The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index (following the signatures section of this report) are included in, or incorporated by

reference into, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 

 

 

 

37

---

 

SIGNATURE

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

 

 

38

---

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

The following exhibits are included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 (and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K):

 

 

 

 

39