NICOLET BANKSHARES INC - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - NICOLET BANKSHARES INC	v471934_ex32-2.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - NICOLET BANKSHARES INC	v471934_ex32-1.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - NICOLET BANKSHARES INC	v471934_ex31-2.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - NICOLET BANKSHARES INC	v471934_ex31-1.htm

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from____________to____________

Commission file number 001-37700

NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

WISCONSIN

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

47-0871001

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

111 North Washington Street

Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301

(920) 430-1400

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of
Registrant’s principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer x	Non-accelerated filer ¨	Smaller reporting company ¨
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Emerging Growth Company x

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of August 1, 2017 there were 9,864,525 shares of $0.01 par value common stock outstanding.

Nicolet Bankshares, Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

			PAGE
PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Financial Statements:

		Consolidated Balance Sheets June 30, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, 2016	3

		Consolidated Statements of Income Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)	4

		Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)	5

		Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 (unaudited)	6

		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)	7

		Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	8-29

	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	30-52

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	52

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	52

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	53

	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	53

	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	53

	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	53

	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	53

	Item 5.	Other Information	53

	Item 6.	Exhibits	54

		Signatures	54

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:

NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share and per share data)

	June 30, 2017 (Unaudited)			December 31, 2016 (Audited)
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	59,215		$	68,056
Interest-earning deposits		51,697			60,320
Federal funds sold		730			727
Cash and cash equivalents		111,642			129,103
Certificates of deposit in other banks		2,985			3,984
Securities available for sale (“AFS”)		418,286			365,287
Other investments		12,939			17,499
Loans held for sale		6,568			6,913
Loans		2,009,964			1,568,907
Allowance for loan losses		(12,591	)		(11,820	)
Loans, net		1,997,373			1,557,087
Premises and equipment, net		47,401			45,862
Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”)		63,460			54,134
Goodwill and other intangibles		128,871			87,938
Accrued interest receivable and other assets		36,392			33,072
Total assets	$	2,825,917		$	2,300,879

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities:
Demand	$	573,372		$	482,300
Money market and NOW accounts		1,170,986			964,509
Savings		265,165			221,282
Time		380,448			301,895
Total deposits		2,389,971			1,969,986
Notes payable		21,787			1,000
Junior subordinated debentures		29,377			24,732
Subordinated notes		11,903			11,885
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		19,923			16,911
Total liabilities		2,472,961			2,024,514

Stockholders’ Equity:
Common stock		99			86
Additional paid-in capital		268,601			209,700
Retained earnings		83,424			68,888
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”)		260			(2,727	)
Total Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. stockholders’ equity		352,384			275,947
Noncontrolling interest		572			418
Total stockholders’ equity and noncontrolling interest		352,956			276,365
Total liabilities, noncontrolling interest and stockholders’ equity	$	2,825,917		$	2,300,879

Preferred shares authorized (no par value)		10,000,000			10,000,000
Preferred shares issued and outstanding		-			-
Common shares authorized (par value $0.01 per share)		30,000,000			30,000,000
Common shares outstanding		9,862,615			8,553,292
Common shares issued		9,890,088			8,596,241

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 1. Financial Statements Continued:

NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Income

(In thousands, except share and per share data) (Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Interest income:
Loans, including loan fees	$	24,673	$	16,836	$	45,768	$	28,406
Investment securities:
Taxable		1,239		762		2,308		1,166
Non-taxable		592		391		1,157		653
Other interest income		376		362		730		555
Total interest income		26,880		18,351		49,963		30,780
Interest expense:
Money market and NOW accounts		779		605		1,375		1,095
Savings and time deposits		886		718		1,477		1,383
Short-term borrowings		51		5		72		5
Notes payable		49		74		52		224
Junior subordinated debentures		429		324		825		550
Subordinated notes		159		159		318		318
Total interest expense		2,353		1,885		4,119		3,575
Net interest income		24,527		16,466		45,844		27,205
Provision for loan losses		450		450		900		900
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		24,077		16,016		44,944		26,305
Noninterest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		1,121		870		2,129		1,463
Mortgage income, net		1,406		1,132		2,248		1,703
Trust services fee income		1,485		1,465		2,952		2,627
Brokerage fee income		1,433		788		2,692		1,098
Bank owned life insurance		454		312		855		562
Rent income		295		273		567		535
Investment advisory fees		109		95		265		195
Gain on sale or writedown of assets, net		772		100		766		95
Other income		2,010		1,335		3,380		1,970
Total noninterest income		9,085		6,370		15,854		10,248
Noninterest expense:
Personnel		10,983		8,884		20,916		14,232
Occupancy, equipment and office		3,223		2,508		6,054		4,306
Business development and marketing		1,317		790		2,246		1,368
Data processing		2,207		1,421		4,190		2,577
FDIC assessments		145		239		377		382
Intangibles amortization		1,178		874		2,341		1,123
Other expense		1,260		2,803		2,512		3,549
Total noninterest expense		20,313		17,519		38,636		27,537

Income before income tax expense		12,849		4,867		22,162		9,016
Income tax expense		4,440		1,545		7,472		2,994
Net income		8,409		3,322		14,690		6,022
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		81		65		154		111
Net income attributable to Nicolet Bankshares, Inc.		8,328		3,257		14,536		5,911
Less: preferred stock dividends		-		274		-		386
Net income available to common shareholders	$	8,328	$	2,983	$	14,536	$	5,525

Basic earnings per common share	$	0.88	$	0.41	$	1.61	$	0.97
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.83	$	0.39	$	1.53	$	0.91
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		9,515,745		7,257,218		9,052,590		5,719,651
Diluted		9,991,625		7,629,175		9,521,206		6,041,543

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 1. Financial Statements Continued:

NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(In thousands) (Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Net income	$	8,409		$	3,322		$	14,690		$	6,022
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized gains on securities AFS:
Net unrealized holding gains arising during the period		1,981			1,770			4,851			3,242
Reclassification adjustment for net gains (losses) included in net income		2			(40	)		2			(40	)
Income tax expense		(746	)		(675	)		(1,866	)		(1,249	)
Total other comprehensive income		1,237			1,055			2,987			1,953
Comprehensive income	$	9,646		$	4,377		$	17,677		$	7,975

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 1. Financial Statements Continued:

NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

(In thousands) (Unaudited)

	Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity
	Common Stock			Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (loss)			Noncontrolling Interest		Total
Balance December 31, 2016	$	86		$	209,700		$	68,888	$	(2,727	)	$	418	$	276,365
Comprehensive income:
Net income		-			-			14,536		-			154		14,690
Other comprehensive income		-			-			-		2,987			-		2,987
Stock compensation expense		-			919			-		-			-		919
Exercise of stock options, net		1			1,235			-		-			-		1,236
Issuance of common stock		-			114			-		-			-		114
Issuance of common stock in acquisitions, net of capitalized issuance costs of $186		13			60,703			-		-			-		60,716
Purchase and retirement of common stock		(1	)		(4,070	)		-		-			-		(4,071	)
Balance, June 30, 2017	$	99		$	268,601		$	83,424	$	260		$	572	$	352,956

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 1. Financial Statements Continued:

NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands) (Unaudited)

	Six months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016
Cash Flows From Operating Activities, net of effects of business combinations:
Net income	$	14,690		$	6,022
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and accretion		3,677			3,166
Provision for loan losses		900			900
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance		(855	)		(562	)
Stock compensation expense		919			768
Gain on sale or writedown of assets, net		(766	)		(95	)
Gain on sale of loans held for sale, net		(2,005	)		(1,642	)
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale		94,371			89,012
Origination of loans held for sale		(95,399	)		(88,830	)
Net change in:
Accrued interest receivable and other assets		1,729			(392	)
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		(1,840	)		(2,797	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		15,421			5,550
Cash Flows From Investing Activities, net of effects of business combinations:
Net decrease in certificates of deposit in other banks		999			490
Net decrease (increase) in loans		(84,385	)		6,811
Purchases of securities AFS		(48,436	)		(35,738	)
Proceeds from sales of securities AFS		10,798			15,849
Proceeds from calls and maturities of securities AFS		25,002			14,327
Purchase of other investments		(891	)		(85	)
Proceeds from sale of other investments		6,146			-
Net increase in premises and equipment		(1,895	)		(2,999	)
Proceeds from sales of other real estate and other assets		2,791			314
Proceeds from redemption of BOLI		-			21,549
Net cash received in business combination		9,119			66,517
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities		(80,752	)		87,035
Cash Flows From Financing Activities, net of effects of business combinations:
Net increase in deposits		45,074			15,485
Net decrease in short-term borrowings		-			(37,917	)
Proceeds from notes payable		10,000			-
Repayments of notes payable		(4,297	)		(51,519	)
Purchase and retirement of common stock		(3,895	)		(281	)
Capitalized issuance costs, net		(186	)		(260	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		114			66
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options, net		1,060			227
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock		-			(142	)
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities		47,870			(74,341	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(17,461	)		18,244
Cash and cash equivalents:
Beginning	$	129,103		$	83,619
Ending	$	111,642		$	101,863
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid for interest	$	4,083		$	3,375
Cash paid for taxes		4,521			3,150
Transfer of loans and bank premises to other real estate owned		828			33
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights		413			191
Transfer of loans from held for sale to held for investment		3,236			-
Acquisitions
Fair value of assets acquired		439,000			1,035,000
Fair value of liabilities assumed		397,000			937,000
Net assets acquired		42,000			98,000

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

General

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries, consolidated balance sheets, statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the periods presented, and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. All material intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.

These interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and, therefore, certain information and footnote disclosures normally presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) have been omitted or abbreviated. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying disclosures. These estimates are based on management’s best knowledge of current events and actions the Company may undertake in the future. Estimates are used in accounting for, among other items, the allowance for loan losses, useful lives for depreciation and amortization, fair value of financial instruments, deferred tax assets, uncertain income tax positions and contingencies. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change for the Company include the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the assessment of deferred tax assets and liabilities, and the valuation of loans acquired in acquisitions; therefore, these are critical accounting policies. Factors that may cause sensitivity to the aforementioned estimates include but are not limited to: external market factors such as market interest rates and employment rates, changes to operating policies and procedures, changes in applicable banking regulations, and changes to deferred tax estimates. Actual results may ultimately differ from estimates, although management does not generally believe such differences would materially affect the consolidated financial statements in any individual reporting period presented.

There have been no material changes or developments with respect to the assumptions or methodologies that the Company uses when applying what management believes are critical accounting policies and developing critical accounting estimates as disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Recent Accounting Developments Adopted

In December 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued updated guidance to Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-19 Technical Corrections and Improvements intended to make changes to clarify the Accounting Standards Codification or correct unintended application of guidance that is not expected to have a significant effect on current accounting practice. The ASU is effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. The impact of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued updated guidance to ASU 2016-09: Stock Compensation Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Activity intended to simplify and improve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of such awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. The updated guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The consolidated financial statements include the impact of the new guidance. The Company adopted the pronouncement as required on January 1, 2017, prospectively, which included a reduction to income tax expense of $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, for deductions attributable to exercised stock options and vesting of restricted stock.

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation, continued

Operating Segment

While the chief decision makers monitor the revenue streams of the various products and services, and evaluate costs, balance sheet positions and quality, all such products, services and activities are directly or indirectly related to the business of community banking, with no regular, formal or material segment delineations. Operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a company-wide basis, and accordingly, all the financial service operations are considered by management to be aggregated in one reportable operating segment.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the 2016 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2017 presentation.

Note 2 – Acquisitions

First Menasha Bancshares, Inc. (“First Menasha”):

On April 28, 2017, the Company consummated its merger with First Menasha pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between the Company and First Menasha dated November 3, 2016, (the “Merger Agreement”), whereby First Menasha was merged with and into the Company, and The First National Bank-Fox Valley, the wholly owned commercial bank subsidiary of First Menasha serving the Fox Valley area of Wisconsin, was merged with and into Nicolet National Bank (the “Bank”). The system integration was completed, and five branches of First Menasha opened, on May 1, 2017, as Nicolet National Bank branches, expanding its presence into Calumet and Winnebago Counties, Wisconsin. Concurrently, Nicolet closed one of its Calumet County locations, bringing the Bank’s footprint to 38 branches as of June 30, 2017.

The purpose of the merger was to continue Nicolet’s interest in strategic growth, consistent with its plan to improve profitability through efficiency, leverage the strengths of each bank across the combined customer base, and add shareholder value. With the merger, Nicolet became the leading community bank to serve the Fox Valley area of Wisconsin.

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the final purchase price consisted of issuing 1,309,885 shares of the Company’s common stock (given the final stock-for-stock exchange ratio of 3.126 except for First Menasha shares owned by the Company immediately prior to the time of the merger), for common stock consideration of $62.2 million (based on $47.52 per share, the volume weighted average closing price of the Company’s common stock over the preceding 20 trading day period) plus cash consideration of $19.3 million. Approximately $0.2 million in direct stock issuance costs for the merger were incurred and charged against additional paid in capital.

Upon consummation, the Company added $479 million in assets, $351 million in loans, $375 million in deposits, $4 million in core deposit intangible, and $40 million of goodwill. The Company accounted for the transaction under the acquisition method of accounting, and thus, the financial position and results of operations of First Menasha prior to the consummation date were not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The accounting required assets purchased and liabilities assumed to be recorded at their respective estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The estimated fair values may be subject to refinement as additional information relative to the closing date fair values becomes available through the measurement period of approximately one year from consummation.

Financial advisor business acquired:

During the first quarter of 2016, Nicolet agreed in a private transaction to hire a select group of financial advisors and purchase their respective books of business, as well as their operating platform, to enhance the leadership and future growth of the Company’s wealth management business. The transaction was effected in phases and completed April 1, 2016. The Company paid $4.9 million total initial consideration, including $0.8 million cash, $2.6 million of Nicolet common stock, and recorded a $1.5 million earn-out liability payable to one principal in the future (which may require adjustment based on change in initial business purchased over a period, but not contingent upon the principal’s employment). The Company initially recorded $0.4 million of goodwill, $0.2 million of fixed assets, and $4.3 million of customer relationship intangibles (a portion amortizing straight-line over 10 years and a portion over 15 years). The transaction impacts the income statement primarily within brokerage income, personnel expense, and intangibles amortization.

Baylake Corp. (“Baylake”):

On April 29, 2016, the Company consummated its merger with Baylake. The system integration was completed, and 21 branches of Baylake opened, on May 2, 2016, as branches of the Bank, expanding its presence into Door, Kewaunee, and Manitowoc Counties, Wisconsin. The Company closed one of its Brown County locations concurrently with the Baylake merger, and closed an additional six branches in the fourth quarter of 2016.

Note 2 – Acquisitions, continued

The purpose of the Baylake merger was for strategic reasons beneficial to the Company. The acquisition was consistent with its plan to drive growth and efficiency through increased scale, leverage the strengths of each bank across the combined customer base, enhance profitability, and add liquidity and shareholder value.

Baylake shareholders received 0.4517 shares of the Company’s common stock for each outstanding share of Baylake common stock (except for Baylake shares pre-owned by the Company at the time of the merger), and cash in lieu of any fractional share. Pre-existing Baylake equity awards (restricted stock units and stock options) immediately vested upon consummation of the merger. The Company issued 0.4517 shares of its common stock for each vesting Baylake restricted stock unit, and Nicolet assumed, after appropriate adjustment by the 0.4517 exchange ratio, all pre-existing Baylake stock options. As a result, the Company issued 4,344,243 shares of the Company’s common stock, for common stock consideration of $163.3 million (based on $37.58 per share, the volume weighted average closing price of the Company’s common stock over the preceding 20 trading day period) and recorded an additional $1.2 million consideration for the assumed stock options. Approximately $0.3 million in direct stock issuance costs for the merger were incurred and charged against additional paid in capital.

The Company accounted for the transaction under the acquisition method of accounting, and thus, the financial position and results of operations of Baylake prior to the consummation date were not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

The fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on April 29, 2016 was as follows:

(in millions)	As recorded by Baylake Corp		Fair Value Adjustments			As Recorded by Nicolet
Cash, cash equivalents and securities available for sale	$	262	$	1		$	263
Loans		710		(19	)		691
Other real estate owned		3		(2	)		1
Core deposit intangible		1		16			17
Fixed assets and other assets		71		(8	)		63
Total assets acquired	$	1,047	$	(12	)	$	1,035

Deposits	$	822	$	-		$	822
Junior subordinated debentures, borrowings and other liabilities		116		(1	)		115
Total liabilities acquired	$	938	$	(1	)	$	937

Excess of assets acquired over liabilities acquired	$	109	$	(11	)	$	98
Less: purchase price							164
Goodwill						$	66

The following unaudited pro forma information presents the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, as if the Baylake acquisition had occurred January 1 of that year. These unaudited pro forma results are presented for illustrative purposes and are not intended to represent or be indicative of the actual results of operations of the combined company that would have been achieved had the acquisition occurred at the beginning of each period presented, nor are they intended to represent or be indicative of future results of operations.

(in thousands, except per share data)	Three months ended June 30, 2016		Six months ended June 30, 2016
Total revenues, net of interest expense	$	26,831	$	53,434
Net income		4,343		10,214
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.46	$	1.10

Note 3 – Earnings per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share are calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock awards (outstanding stock options and unvested restricted stock), if any. Presented below are the calculations for basic and diluted earnings per common share.

Note 3 – Earnings per Common Share, continued

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
(In thousands except per share data)
Net income, net of noncontrolling interest	$	8,328	$	3,257	$	14,536	$	5,911
Less: preferred stock dividends		-		274		-		386
Net income available to common shareholders	$	8,328	$	2,983	$	14,536	$	5,525
Weighted average common shares outstanding		9,516		7,257		9,053		5,720
Effect of dilutive stock instruments		476		372		468		322
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		9,992		7,629		9,521		6,042
Basic earnings per common share*	$	0.88	$	0.41	$	1.61	$	0.97
Diluted earnings per common share*	$	0.83	$	0.39	$	1.53	$	0.91

*Cumulative quarterly per share performance may not equal annual per share totals due to the effects of the amount and timing of capital increases. When computing earnings per share for an interim period, the denominator is based on the weighted-average shares outstanding during the interim period, and not on an annualized weighted-average basis. Accordingly, the sum of the quarters' earnings per share data will not necessarily equal the year to date earnings per share data.

There were no options outstanding at June 30, 2017 or June 30, 2016 that were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share as anti-dilutive.

Note 4 – Stock-based Compensation

A Black-Scholes model is utilized to estimate the fair value of stock options and the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant is used to estimate the value of restricted stock awards. The weighted average assumptions used in the model for valuing option grants were as follows:

	Six months ended June 30, 2017			Year ended December 31, 2016
Dividend yield		0	%		0	%
Expected volatility		25	%		25	%
Risk-free interest rate		2.13	%		1.52	%
Expected average life		7 years			7 years
Weighted average per share fair value of options	$	15.44		$	11.04

Activity in the Company’s Stock Incentive Plans is summarized in the following tables:

Stock Options	Weighted- Average Fair Value of Options Granted		Option Shares Outstanding			Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Exercisable Shares
Balance – December 31, 2015				746,004		$	21.56		325,979
Granted	$	11.04		170,500			36.86
Options assumed in acquisition				91,701			21.03
Exercise of stock options*				(84,723	)		20.98
Forfeited				(1,456	)		21.71
Balance – December 31, 2016				922,026			24.39		439,639
Granted	$	15.44		814,500			48.86
Exercise of stock options*				(63,498	)		19.46
Forfeited				(400	)		16.50
Balance – June 30, 2017				1,672,628		$	36.49		446,278

*The terms of the stock option agreements permit having a number of shares of stock withheld, the fair market value of which as of the date of exercise is sufficient to satisfy the exercise price and/or tax withholding requirements, and accordingly 3,635 shares were surrendered during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 10,244 shares were surrendered during the year ended December 31, 2016. These stock options were considered exercised and then surrendered and are included in the Exercise of stock option line.

Note 4 – Stock-based Compensation, continued

Options outstanding at June 30, 2017 are exercisable at option prices ranging from $9.19 to $49.30. There are 258,875 options outstanding in the range from $9.19 - $20.00, 241,665 options outstanding in the range from $20.01 - $25.00, 154,724 options outstanding in the range from $25.01 - $30.00, 202,864 options outstanding in the range from $30.01 - $40.00 and 814,500 options outstanding in the range from $40.01 - $49.30. At June 30, 2017, the exercisable options have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately 5 years and a weighted average exercise price of $20.53.

Intrinsic value represents the amount by which the fair market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the stock options. The total intrinsic value of options exercised in the first six months of 2017, and full year of 2016 was approximately $1.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively.

Restricted Stock	Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value		Restricted Shares Outstanding
Balance – December 31, 2015	$	18.70		36,690
Granted		33.68		31,466
Vested*		23.58		(25,207	)
Forfeited		-		-
Balance – December 31, 2016		26.80		42,949
Granted		-		-
Vested *		22.47		(15,346	)
Forfeited		16.50		(130	)
Balance – June 30, 2017	$	29.27		27,473

*The terms of the restricted stock agreements permit the surrender of shares to the Company upon vesting in order to satisfy applicable tax withholding requirements at the minimum statutory withholding rate, and accordingly 4,553 shares were surrendered during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 7,851 shares were surrendered during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016.

The Company recognized approximately $0.9 million and $0.7 million of stock-based employee compensation expense during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, associated with its stock equity awards. As of June 30, 2017, there was approximately $16.2 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to equity award grants. The cost is expected to be recognized over the weighted average remaining vesting period of approximately four and one half years.

Note 5 – Securities Available for Sale

Amortized costs and fair values of securities available for sale are summarized as follows:

	June 30, 2017
(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
U.S. government sponsored enterprises	$	26,374	$	-	$	222	$	26,152
State, county and municipals		191,482		563		917		191,128
Mortgage-backed securities		166,537		313		1,179		165,671
Corporate debt securities		32,224		572		-		32,796
Equity securities		1,287		1,252		-		2,539
	$	417,904	$	2,700	$	2,318	$	418,286

	December 31, 2016
(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
U.S. government sponsored enterprises	$	1,981	$	-	$	18	$	1,963
State, county and municipals		191,721		160		4,638		187,243
Mortgage-backed securities		161,309		242		2,422		159,129
Corporate debt securities		12,117		52		-		12,169
Equity securities		2,631		2,152		-		4,783
	$	369,759	$	2,606	$	7,078	$	365,287

Note 5 – Securities Available for Sale, continued

The following table represents gross unrealized losses and the related fair value of investment securities available for sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

	June 30, 2017
	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
(in thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S Government agency securities	$	26,374	$	222	$	-	$	-	$	26,374	$	222
State, county and municipals		113,373		796		7,838		121		121,211		917
Mortgage-backed securities		108,512		938		11,955		241		120,466		1,179
	$	248,259	$	1,956	$	19,793	$	362	$	268,051	$	2,318

	December 31, 2016
	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
(in thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S Government agency securities	$	1,963	$	18	$	-	$	-	$	1,963	$	18
State, county and municipals		167,457		4,629		1,300		9		168,757		4,638
Mortgage-backed securities		134,770		2,311		3,653		111		138,423		2,422
	$	304,190	$	6,958	$	4,953	$	120	$	309,143	$	7,078

At June 30, 2017 the Company had $2.3 million of gross unrealized losses related to 529 securities. As of June 30, 2017, the Company does not consider securities with unrealized losses to be other-than-temporarily impaired as the unrealized losses in each category have occurred as a result of changes in interest rates and current market conditions subsequent to purchase, not credit deterioration. The Company has the ability and intent to hold its securities to maturity. There were no other-than-temporary impairments charged to earnings during the six-month periods ending June 30, 2017 or June 30, 2016.

The amortized cost and fair values of securities available for sale at June 30, 2017 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Fair values of securities are estimated based on financial models or prices paid for the same or similar securities. It is possible interest rates could change considerably, resulting in a material change in estimated fair value.

	June 30, 2017
(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in less than one year	$	13,978	$	13,976
Due in one year through five years		96,542		96,791
Due after five years through ten years		131,571		130,961
Due after ten years		7,989		8,348
		250,080		250,076
Mortgage-backed securities		166,537		165,671
Equity securities		1,287		2,539
Securities available for sale	$	417,904	$	418,286

Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale during the first six months of 2017 and 2016 were approximately $10.8 million and $15.8 million, respectively. During the first six months of 2017, gross gains and losses realized were $5,000 and $7,000, respectively, while gross gains and gross losses were $50,000 and $10,000, respectively, for the comparable six months of 2016.

Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality

The loan composition as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is summarized as follows.

	Total
	June 30, 2017						December 31, 2016
(in thousands)	Amount			% of Total			Amount			% of Total
Commercial & industrial	$	589,460			29.3	%	$	428,270			27.3	%
Owner-occupied commercial real estate (“CRE”)		419,066			20.8			360,227			23.0
Agricultural (“AG”) production		35,428			1.8			34,767			2.2
AG real estate		49,977			2.5			45,234			2.9
CRE investment		307,572			15.3			195,879			12.5
Construction & land development		85,367			4.3			74,988			4.8
Residential construction		29,325			1.4			23,392			1.5
Residential first mortgage		369,007			18.4			300,304			19.1
Residential junior mortgage		103,935			5.2			91,331			5.8
Retail & other		20,827			1.0			14,515			0.9
Loans		2,009,964			100.0	%		1,568,907			100.0	%
Less allowance for loan losses		12,591						11,820
Loans, net	$	1,997,373					$	1,557,087
Allowance for loan losses to loans		0.63	%					0.75	%

	Originated
	June 30, 2017						December 31, 2016
(in thousands)	Amount			% of Total			Amount			% of Total
Commercial & industrial	$	420,456			39.2	%	$	330,073			36.6	%
Owner-occupied CRE		204,781			19.1			182,776			20.3
AG production		10,205			0.9			9,192			1.0
AG real estate		23,229			2.2			18,858			2.1
CRE investment		93,992			8.8			72,930			8.1
Construction & land development		48,880			4.5			44,147			4.9
Residential construction		21,275			2.0			20,768			2.3
Residential first mortgage		177,761			16.6			164,949			18.3
Residential junior mortgage		57,718			5.4			48,199			5.3
Retail & other		14,605			1.3			10,095			1.1
Loans		1,072,902			100.0	%		901,987			100.0	%
Less allowance for loan losses		10,200						9,449
Loans, net	$	1,062,702					$	892,538
Allowance for loan losses to loans		0.95	%					1.05	%

	Acquired
	June 30, 2017						December 31, 2016
(in thousands)	Amount			% of Total			Amount			% of Total
Commercial & industrial	$	169,004			18.0	%	$	98,197			14.7	%
Owner-occupied CRE		214,285			22.9			177,451			26.6
AG production		25,223			2.7			25,575			3.8
AG real estate		26,748			2.9			26,376			4.0
CRE investment		213,580			22.8			122,949			18.4
Construction & land development		36,487			3.9			30,841			4.6
Residential construction		8,050			0.9			2,624			0.4
Residential first mortgage		191,246			20.3			135,355			20.3
Residential junior mortgage		46,217			4.9			43,132			6.5
Retail & other		6,222			0.7			4,420			0.7
Loans		937,062			100.0	%		666,920			100.0	%
Less allowance for loan losses		2,391						2,371
Loans, net	$	934,671					$	664,549
Allowance for loan losses to loans		0.26	%					0.36	%

Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued

Practically all of the Company’s loans, commitments, financial letters of credit and standby letters of credit have been granted to customers in the Company’s market area. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, the credit risk in the loan portfolio is largely influenced by general economic conditions and trends of the counties and markets in which the debtors operate, and the resulting impact on the operations of borrowers or on the value of underlying collateral, if any.

The allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) represents management’s estimate of probable and inherent credit losses in the Company’s loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. In general, estimating the amount of the ALLL is a function of a number of factors, including but not limited to changes in the loan portfolio, net charge-offs, trends in past due and impaired loans, and the level of potential problem loans, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. To the extent actual outcomes differ from management estimates, additional provisions for loan losses could be required that could adversely affect our earnings or financial position in future periods. Allocations to the ALLL may be made for specific loans but the entire ALLL is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged-off or for which an actual loss is realized.

The allocation methodology used by the Company includes specific allocations for impaired loans evaluated individually for impairment based on collateral values and for the remaining loan portfolio collectively evaluated for impairment primarily based on historical loss rates and other qualitative factors. Loan charge-offs and recoveries are based on actual amounts charged-off or recovered by loan category. Management allocates the ALLL by pools of risk within each loan portfolio.

The following tables present the balance and activity in the ALLL by portfolio segment and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio at or for the six months ended June 30, 2017:

	TOTAL – Six months Ended June 30, 2017
(in thousands)	Commercial & industrial			Owner- occupied CRE			AG production			AG real estate			CRE investment			Construction & land development			Residential construction			Residential first mortgage			Residential junior mortgage			Retail & other			Total
ALLL:
Beginning balance	$	3,919		$	2,867		$	150		$	285		$	1,124		$	774		$	304		$	1,784		$	461		$	152		$	11,820
Provision		955			(211	)		11			13			220			(43	)		(154	)		6			36			67			900
Charge-offs		(129	)		-			-			-			-			(13	)		-			(8	)		-			(26	)		(176	)
Recoveries		19			14			-			-			1			-			-			4			1			8			47
Net charge-offs		(110	)		14			-			-			1			(13	)		-			(4	)		1			(18	)		(129	)
Ending balance	$	4,764		$	2,670		$	161		$	298		$	1,345		$	718		$	150		$	1,786		$	498		$	201		$	12,591
As percent of ALLL		37.8	%		21.2	%		1.3	%		2.4	%		10.7	%		5.7	%		1.2	%		14.2	%		4.0	%		1.5	%		100.0	%

ALLL:
Individually evaluated	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
Collectively evaluated		4,764			2,670			161			298			1,345			718			150			1,786			498			201			12,591
Ending balance	$	4,764		$	2,670		$	161		$	298		$	1,345		$	718		$	150		$	1,786		$	498		$	201		$	12,591

Loans:
Individually evaluated	$	4,005		$	3,098		$	37		$	229		$	6,053		$	740		$	80		$	2,029		$	295		$	-		$	16,566
Collectively evaluated		585,455			415,968			35,391			49,748			301,519			84,627			29,245			366,978			103,640			20,827			1,993,398
Total loans	$	589,460		$	419,066		$	35,428		$	49,977		$	307,572		$	85,367		$	29,325		$	369,007		$	103,935		$	20,827		$	2,009,964

Less ALLL	$	4,764		$	2,670		$	161		$	298		$	1,345		$	718		$	150		$	1,786		$	498		$	201		$	12,591
Net loans	$	584,696		$	416,396		$	35,267		$	49,679		$	306,227		$	84,649		$	29,175		$	367,221		$	103,437		$	20,626		$	1,997,373

Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued

	Originated – Six months Ended June 30, 2017
(in thousands)	Commercial & industrial			Owner- occupied CRE			AG production			AG real estate			CRE investment			Construction & land development			Residential construction			Residential first mortgage			Residential junior mortgage			Retail & other			Total
ALLL:
Beginning balance	$	3,150		$	2,263		$	122		$	222		$	893		$	656		$	266		$	1,372		$	373		$	132		$	9,449
Provision		846			(161	)		13			10			197			(50	)		(149	)		40			33			58			837
Charge-offs		(75	)		-			-			-			-			-			-			(8	)		-			(26	)		(109	)
Recoveries		1			12			-			-			-			-			-			1			1			8			23
Net charge-offs		(74	)		12			-			-			-			-			-			(7	)		1			(18	)		(86	)
Ending balance	$	3,922		$	2,114		$	135		$	232		$	1,090		$	606		$	117		$	1,405		$	407		$	172		$	10,200
As percent of ALLL		38.5	%		20.7	%		1.3	%		2.3	%		10.7	%		5.9	%		1.1	%		13.8	%		4.0	%		1.7	%		100.0	%

ALLL:
Individually evaluated	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
Collectively evaluated		3,922			2,114			135			232			1,090			606			117			1,405			407			172			10,200
Ending balance	$	3,922		$	2,114		$	135		$	232		$	1,090		$	606		$	117		$	1,405		$	407		$	172		$	10,200

Loans:
Individually evaluated	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
Collectively evaluated		420,456			204,781			10,205			23,229			93,992			48,880			21,275			177,761			57,718			14,605			1,072,902
Total loans	$	420,456		$	204,781		$	10,205		$	23,229		$	93,992		$	48,880		$	21,275		$	177,761		$	57,718		$	14,605		$	1,072,902

Less ALLL	$	3,922		$	2,114		$	135		$	232		$	1,090		$	606		$	117		$	1,405		$	407		$	172		$	10,200
Net loans	$	416,534		$	202,667		$	10,070		$	22,997		$	92,902		$	48,274		$	21,158		$	176,356		$	57,311		$	14,433		$	1,062,702

	Acquired – Six months Ended June 30, 2017
(in thousands)	Commercial & industrial			Owner- occupied CRE			AG production			AG real estate			CRE investment			Construction & land development			Residential construction			Residential first mortgage			Residential junior mortgage			Retail & other			Total
ALLL:
Beginning balance	$	769		$	604		$	28		$	63		$	231		$	118		$	38		$	412		$	88		$	20		$	2,371
Provision		109			(50	)		(2	)		3			23			7			(5	)		(34	)		3			9			63
Charge-offs		(54	)		-			-			-			-			(13	)		-			-			-			-			(67	)
Recoveries		18			2			-			-			1			-			-			3			-			-			24
Net charge-offs		(36	)		2			-			-			1			(13	)		-			3			-			-			(43	)
Ending balance	$	842		$	556		$	26		$	66		$	255		$	112		$	33		$	381		$	91		$	29		$	2,391
As percent of ALLL		35.2	%		23.3	%		1.1	%		2.8	%		10.7	%		4.7	%		1.4	%		15.8	%		3.8	%		1.2	%		100.0	%

Loans:
Individually evaluated	$	4,005		$	3,098		$	37		$	229		$	6,053		$	740		$	80		$	2,029		$	295		$	-		$	16,566
Collectively evaluated		164,999			211,187			25,186			26,519			207,527			35,747			7,970			189,217			45,922			6,222			920,496
Total loans	$	169,004		$	214,285		$	25,223		$	26,748		$	213,580		$	36,487		$	8,050		$	191,246		$	46,217		$	6,222		$	937,062

Less ALLL	$	842		$	556		$	26		$	66		$	255		$	112		$	33		$	381		$	91		$	29		$	2,391
Net loans	$	168,162		$	213,729		$	25,197		$	26,682		$	213,325		$	36,375		$	8,017		$	190,865		$	46,126		$	6,193		$	934,671

Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued

The following table presents the balance and activity in the ALLL by portfolio segment and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio at or for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

	TOTAL – Six months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands)	Commercial & industrial			Owner- occupied CRE			AG production			AG real estate			CRE investment			Construction & land development			Residential construction			Residential first mortgage			Residential junior mortgage			Retail & other			Total
ALLL:
Beginning balance	$	3,721		$	1,933		$	85		$	380		$	785		$	1,446		$	147		$	1,240		$	496		$	74		$	10,307
Provision		345			491			12			40			170			(385	)		72			85			11			59			900
Charge-offs		(262	)		-			-			-			-			-			-			-			(12	)		(24	)		(298	)
Recoveries		17			2			-			-			8			-			-			3			6			2			38
Net charge-offs		(245	)		2			-			-			8			-			-			3			(6	)		(22	)		(260	)
Ending balance	$	3,821		$	2,426		$	97		$	420		$	963		$	1,061		$	219		$	1,328		$	501		$	111		$	10,947
As percent of ALLL		34.9	%		22.2	%		0.9	%		3.8	%		8.8	%		9.7	%		2.0	%		12.1	%		4.6	%		1.0	%		100.0	%

ALLL:
Individually evaluated	$	-		$	119		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	119
Collectively evaluated		3,821			2,307		$	97		$	420		$	963		$	1,061		$	219		$	1,328		$	501		$	111		$	10,828
Ending balance	$	3,821		$	2,426		$	97		$	420		$	963		$	1,061		$	219			1,328		$	501		$	111		$	10,947

Loans:
Individually evaluated	$	1,407		$	3,836		$	64		$	252		$	14,595		$	1,074		$	313		$	2,482		$	185		$	-		$	24,208
Collectively evaluated		425,686			355,565			32,582			52,753			184,990			67,883			20,121			285,240			97,324			14,205			1,536,349
Total loans	$	427,093		$	359,401		$	32,646		$	53,005		$	199,585		$	68,957		$	20,434		$	287,722		$	97,509		$	14,205		$	1,560,557

Less ALLL	$	3,821		$	2,426		$	97		$	420		$	963		$	1,061		$	219		$	1,328		$	501		$	111		$	10,947
Net loans	$	423,272		$	356,975		$	32,549		$	52,585		$	198,622		$	67,896		$	20,215		$	286,394		$	97,008		$	14,094		$	1,549,610

	Originated – Six months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands)	Commercial & industrial			Owner- occupied CRE			AG production			AG real estate			CRE investment			Construction & land development			Residential construction			Residential first mortgage			Residential junior mortgage			Retail & other			Total
ALLL:
Beginning balance	$	3,135		$	1,567		$	71		$	299		$	646		$	1,381		$	147		$	987		$	418		$	63		$	8,714
Provision		361			481			12			46			166			(393	)		50			104			20			58			905
Charge-offs		(262	)		-			-			-			-			-			-			-			(12	)		(24	)		(298	)
Recoveries		-			2			-			-			8			-			-			-			5			1			16
Net charge-offs		(262	)		2			-			-			8			-			-			-			(7	)		(23	)		(282	)
Ending balance	$	3,234		$	2,050		$	83		$	345		$	820		$	988		$	197		$	1,091		$	431		$	98		$	9,337
As percent of ALLL		34.6	%		22.0	%		0.9	%		3.7	%		8.8	%		10.6	%		2.1	%		11.7	%		4.6	%		1.0	%		100.0	%

ALLL:
Individually evaluated	$	-		$	119		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	119
Collectively evaluated		3,234			1,931			83			345			820			988			197			1,091			431			98			9,218
Ending balance	$	3,234		$	2,050		$	83		$	345		$	820		$	988		$	197		$	1,091		$	431		$	98		$	9,337

Loans:
Individually evaluated	$	440		$	623		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	1,063
Collectively evaluated		305,077			162,423			7,102			26,063			65,153			33,000			14,391			132,422			46,230			8,496			800,357
Total loans	$	305,517		$	163,046		$	7,102		$	26,063		$	65,153		$	33,000		$	14,391		$	132,422		$	46,230		$	8,496		$	801,420

Less ALLL	$	3,234		$	2,050		$	83		$	345		$	820		$	988		$	197		$	1,091		$	431		$	98		$	9,337
Net loans	$	302,283		$	160,996		$	7,019		$	25,718		$	64,333		$	32,012		$	14,194		$	131,331		$	45,799		$	8,398		$	792,083

Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued

	Acquired – Six months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands)	Commercial & industrial			Owner- occupied CRE			AG production			AG real estate			CRE investment			Construction & land development			Residential construction			Residential first mortgage			Residential junior mortgage			Retail & other			Total
ALLL:
Beginning balance	$	586		$	366		$	14		$	81		$	139		$	65		$	-		$	253		$	78		$	11		$	1,593
Provision		(16	)		10			-			(6	)		4			8			22			(19	)		(9	)		1			(5	)
Charge-offs		-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-
Recoveries		17			-			-			-			-			-			-			3			1			1			22
Net charge-offs		17			-			-			-			-			-			-			3			1			1			22
Ending balance	$	587		$	376		$	14		$	75		$	143		$	73		$	22		$	237		$	70		$	13		$	1,610
As percent of ALLL		36.5	%		23.4	%		0.9	%		4.7	%		8.9	%		4.5	%		1.4	%		14.7	%		4.3	%		0.7	%		100.0	%

Loans:
Individually evaluated	$	967		$	3,213		$	64		$	252		$	14,595		$	1,074		$	313		$	2,482		$	185		$	-		$	23,145
Collectively evaluated		120,609			193,142			25,480			26,690			119,837			34,883			5,730			152,818			51,094			5,709			735,992
Total loans	$	121,576		$	196,355		$	25,544		$	26,942		$	134,432		$	35,957		$	6,043		$	155,300		$	51,279		$	5,709		$	759,137

Less ALLL	$	587		$	376		$	14		$	75		$	143		$	73		$	22		$	237		$	70		$	13		$	1,610
Net loans	$	120,989		$	195,979		$	25,530		$	26,867		$	134,289		$	35,884		$	6,021		$	155,063		$	51,209		$	5,696		$	757,527

Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued

The following table presents nonaccrual loans by portfolio segment in total and then as a further breakdown by originated or acquired as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

	Total Nonaccrual Loans
(in thousands)	June 30, 2017		% to Total			December 31, 2016		% to Total
Commercial & industrial	$	4,017		23.8	%	$	358		1.8	%
Owner-occupied CRE		3,266		19.3			2,894		14.3
AG production		3		0.0			9		0.1
AG real estate		197		1.2			208		1.0
CRE investment		5,744		34.0			12,317		60.6
Construction & land development		740		4.4			1,193		5.9
Residential construction		80		0.5			260		1.3
Residential first mortgage		2,602		15.4			2,990		14.7
Residential junior mortgage		252		1.4			56		0.3
Retail & other		-		-			-		-
Nonaccrual loans - Total	$	16,901		100.0	%	$	20,285		100.0	%

	Originated
(in thousands)	June 30, 2017		% to Total			December 31, 2016		% to Total
Commercial & industrial	$	1		0.4	%	$	4		1.6	%
Owner-occupied CRE		39		14.7			42		16.3
AG production		3		1.1			7		2.7
AG real estate		-		-			-		-
CRE investment		-		-			-		-
Construction & land development		-		-			-		-
Residential construction		-		-			-		-
Residential first mortgage		188		70.7			204		79.4
Residential junior mortgage		34		13.1			-		-
Retail & other		-		-			-		-
Nonaccrual loans - Originated	$	265		100.0	%	$	257		100.0	%

	Acquired
(in thousands)	June 30, 2017		% to Total			December 31, 2016		% to Total
Commercial & industrial	$	4,016		24.2	%	$	354		1.8	%
Owner-occupied CRE		3,227		19.4			2,852		14.2
AG production		-		-			2		0.1
AG real estate		197		1.2			208		1.0
CRE investment		5,744		34.5			12,317		61.4
Construction & land development		740		4.4			1,193		6.0
Residential construction		80		0.5			260		1.3
Residential first mortgage		2,414		14.5			2,786		13.9
Residential junior mortgage		217		1.3			56		0.3
Retail & other		-		-			-		-
Nonaccrual loans – Acquired	$	16,635		100.0	%	$	20,028		100.0	%

Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued

The following tables present total past due loans by portfolio segment as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

	June 30, 2017
(in thousands)	30-89 Days Past Due (accruing)			90 Days & Over or non- accrual			Current			Total
Commercial & industrial	$	167		$	4,017		$	585,276		$	589,460
Owner-occupied CRE		363			3,266			415,437			419,066
AG production		-			3			35,425			35,428
AG real estate		-			197			49,780			49,977
CRE investment		154			5,744			301,674			307,572
Construction & land development		-			740			84,627			85,367
Residential construction		-			80			29,245			29,325
Residential first mortgage		578			2,602			365,827			369,007
Residential junior mortgage		20			252			103,663			103,935
Retail & other		6			-			20,821			20,827
Total loans	$	1,288		$	16,901		$	1,991,775		$	2,009,964
As a percent of total loans		0.1	%		0.8	%		99.1	%		100.0	%

	December 31, 2016
(in thousands)	30-89 Days Past Due (accruing)			90 Days & Over or non- accrual			Current			Total
Commercial & industrial	$	22		$	358		$	427,890		$	428,270
Owner-occupied CRE		268			2,894			357,065			360,227
AG production		-			9			34,758			34,767
AG real estate		-			208			45,026			45,234
CRE investment		-			12,317			183,562			195,879
Construction & land development		-			1,193			73,795			74,988
Residential construction		-			260			23,132			23,392
Residential first mortgage		486			2,990			296,828			300,304
Residential junior mortgage		200			56			91,075			91,331
Retail & other		15			-			14,500			14,515
Total loans	$	991		$	20,285		$	1,547,631		$	1,568,907
As a percent of total loans		0.1	%		1.3	%		98.6	%		100.0	%

A description of the loan risk categories used by the Company follows:

1-4 Pass: Credits exhibit adequate cash flows, appropriate management and financial ratios within industry norms and/or are supported by sufficient collateral. Some credits in these rating categories may require a need for monitoring but elements of concern are not severe enough to warrant an elevated rating.

5 Watch: Credits with this rating are adequately secured and performing but are being monitored due to the presence of various short-term weaknesses which may include unexpected, short-term adverse financial performance, managerial problems, potential impact of a decline in the entire industry or local economy and delinquency issues. Loans to individuals or loans supported by guarantors with marginal net worth or collateral may be included in this rating category.

6 Special Mention: Credits with this rating have potential weaknesses that, without the Company’s attention and correction may result in deterioration of repayment prospects. These assets are considered Criticized Assets. Potential weaknesses may include adverse financial trends for the borrower or industry, repeated lack of compliance with Company requests, increasing debt to net worth, serious management conditions and decreasing cash flow.

7 Substandard: Assets with this rating are characterized by the distinct possibility the Company will sustain some loss if deficiencies are not corrected. All foreclosures, liquidations, and non-accrual loans are considered to be categorized in this rating, regardless of collateral sufficiency.

8 Doubtful: Assets with this rating exhibit all the weaknesses as one rated Substandard with the added characteristic that such weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable.

Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued

9 Loss: Assets in this category are considered uncollectible. Pursuing any recovery or salvage value is impractical but does not preclude partial recovery in the future.

The following tables present total loans by loan grade as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

	June 30, 2017
(in thousands)	Grades 1- 4			Grade 5			Grade 6			Grade 7			Grade 8		Grade 9		Total
Commercial & industrial	$	559,790		$	13,074		$	3,621		$	12,975		$	-	$	-	$	589,460
Owner-occupied CRE		397,649			15,192			725			5,500			-		-		419,066
AG production		30,334			5,017			63			14			-		-		35,428
AG real estate		42,555			6,831			-			591			-		-		49,977
CRE investment		297,090			3,156			-			7,326			-		-		307,572
Construction & land development		77,887			6,528			17			935			-		-		85,367
Residential construction		29,047			198			-			80			-		-		29,325
Residential first mortgage		362,287			2,191			873			3,656			-		-		369,007
Residential junior mortgage		103,500			17			92			326			-		-		103,935
Retail & other		20,827			-			-			-			-		-		20,827
Total loans	$	1,920,966		$	52,204		$	5,391		$	31,403		$	-	$	-	$	2,009,964
Percent of total		95.5	%		2.6	%		0.3	%		1.6	%		-		-		100.0	%

	December 31, 2016
(in thousands)	Grades 1- 4			Grade 5			Grade 6			Grade 7			Grade 8		Grade 9		Total
Commercial & industrial	$	401,954		$	16,633		$	2,133		$	7,550		$	-	$	-	$	428,270
Owner-occupied CRE		340,846			14,758			193			4,430			-		-		360,227
AG production		31,026			3,191			70			480			-		-		34,767
AG real estate		41,747			2,727			-			760			-		-		45,234
CRE investment		173,652			8,137			-			14,090			-		-		195,879
Construction & land development		69,097			4,318			-			1,573			-		-		74,988
Residential construction		22,030			1,102			-			260			-		-		23,392
Residential first mortgage		295,109			1,348			192			3,655			-		-		300,304
Residential junior mortgage		91,123			-			114			94			-		-		91,331
Retail & other		14,515			-			-			-			-		-		14,515
Total loans	$	1,481,099		$	52,214		$	2,702		$	32,892		$	-	$	-	$	1,568,907
Percent of total		94.4	%		3.3	%		0.2	%		2.1	%		-		-		100.0	%

Management considers a loan to be impaired when it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all contractual principal and interest payments due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement. For determining the adequacy of the ALLL, management defines impaired loans as nonaccrual credit relationships over $250,000, all loans determined to be troubled debt restructurings, plus additional loans with impairment risk characteristics. At the time an individual loan goes into nonaccrual status, however, management evaluates the loan for impairment and possible charge-off regardless of loan size.

In determining the appropriateness of the ALLL, management includes allocations for specifically identified impaired loans and loss factor allocations for all remaining loans, with a component primarily based on historical loss rates and another component primarily based on other qualitative factors. Impaired loans are individually assessed and are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Loans that are determined not to be impaired are collectively evaluated for impairment, stratified by type and allocated loss ranges based on the Company’s actual historical loss ratios for each strata, and adjustments are also provided for certain current environmental and qualitative factors. An internal loan review function rates loans using a grading system based on nine different categories. Loans with grades of seven or higher (“classified loans”) represent loans with a greater risk of loss and may be assigned allocations for loss based on specific review of the weaknesses observed in the individual credits if classified as impaired. Classified loans are constantly monitored by the loan review function to ensure early identification of any deterioration.

Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued

The following tables present impaired loans as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

	Total Impaired Loans – June 30, 2017
(in thousands)	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized

Commercial & industrial	$	4,005	$	9,020	$	-	$	4,013	$	235
Owner-occupied CRE		3,098		5,488		-		3,216		183
AG production		37		51		-		38		3
AG real estate		229		363		-		233		13
CRE investment		6,053		10,518		-		6,286		363
Construction & land development		740		1,577		-		752		78
Residential construction		80		983		-		98		33
Residential first mortgage		2,029		3,515		-		2,080		127
Residential junior mortgage		295		761		-		303		27
Retail & Other		-		25		-		-		1
Total	$	16,566	$	32,301	$	-	$	17,019	$	1,063

There were no originated impaired loans as of June 30, 2017. All loans in the table above were acquired loans.

	Total Impaired Loans – December 31, 2016
(in thousands)	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
Commercial & industrial	$	338	$	720	$	-	$	348	$	34
Owner-occupied CRE		2,588		4,661		-		2,700		271
AG production		41		163		-		48		6
AG real estate		240		332		-		245		26
CRE investment		12,552		19,695		-		12,982		1,051
Construction & land development		694		2,122		-		752		112
Residential construction		261		1,348		-		287		82
Residential first mortgage		2,204		3,706		-		2,312		190
Residential junior mortgage		299		639		-		209		17
Retail & Other		-		36		-		-		-
Total	$	19,217	$	33,422	$	-	$	19,883	$	1,789

There were no originated impaired loans as of December 31, 2016. All loans in the table above were acquired loans.

In April 2017, the First Menasha merger added purchased credit impaired loans at a fair value of $5.4 million, net of an initial $5.9 million non-accretable mark. Including these credit impaired loans acquired in the First Menasha merger, total purchased credit impaired loans acquired in aggregate were initially recorded at a fair value of $42.9 million on their respective acquisition dates, net of an initial $32.0 million non-accretable mark and a zero accretable mark. At June 30, 2017, $15.8 million of the $42.9 million remain in impaired loans and $0.8 million of acquired loans have subsequently become impaired, bringing acquired impaired loans to $16.6 million.

Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued

Non-accretable discount on purchase credit impaired (“PCI”) loans:

	Six months ended			Year ended
(in thousands)	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Balance at beginning of period	$	14,327		$	4,229
Acquired balance, net		5,932			13,923
Reclassifications from (to) non-accretable		-			-
Accretion to loan interest income		(3,830	)		(3,458	)
Disposals of loans		(1,104	)		(367	)
Balance at end of period	$	15,325		$	14,327

Troubled Debt Restructurings

At June 30, 2017, there were five loans classified as troubled debt restructurings totaling $0.8 million. These five loans had a combined premodification balance of $1.0 million. There were no other loans which were modified and classified as troubled debt restructurings at June 30, 2017. There were no loans classified as troubled debt restructurings during the previous twelve months that subsequently defaulted as of June 30, 2017. Loans which were considered troubled debt restructurings by First Menasha and Baylake prior to acquisition are not required to be classified as troubled debt restructurings in the Company’s consolidated financial statements unless and until such loans subsequently meet criteria to be classified as such, since acquired loans were recorded at their estimated fair values at the time of the acquisition.

Note 7 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets and Mortgage Servicing Rights

The excess of the purchase price in an acquisition over the fair value of net assets acquired consists primarily of goodwill, core deposit intangibles and other identifiable intangibles (primarily related to customer relationships acquired). Goodwill is not amortized but is instead subject to impairment tests on at least an annual basis. Core deposit intangibles, which arise from value ascribed to the deposit base of a bank acquired, have estimated finite lives and are amortized on an accelerated basis to expense over a 10-year period. The other intangibles, which represent value ascribed to financial advisor books of business purchased in 2016 in a private transaction, have estimated finite lives and are amortized on a straight-line basis to expense over their life.

Management periodically reviews the carrying value of its long-lived and intangible assets to determine if any impairment has occurred, in which case an impairment charge would be recorded as an expense in the period of impairment, or whether changes in circumstances have occurred that would require a revision to the remaining useful life which would impact expense prospectively. In making such determination, management evaluates whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist, as well as the performance, on an undiscounted basis, of the underlying operations or assets which give rise to the intangible. The Company’s annual assessments indicated no impairment charge on goodwill or core deposit intangible was required for 2016 or the first six months of 2017.

Goodwill: Goodwill was $107 million at June 30, 2017 and $67 million at December 31, 2016. There was an addition to the carrying amount of goodwill in 2017 of $40 million related to the related to the First Menasha merger. See Note 2 for additional information on the acquisitions.

Other intangible assets: Other intangible assets, consisting of core deposit intangibles and other intangibles (related to the customer relationships acquired in connection with the 2016 acquisition of financial advisor business), are amortized over their estimated finite lives. There was an addition of $3.7 million to the core deposit intangibles related to the First Menasha merger. See Note 2 for additional information on the acquisitions.

Note 7 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets and Mortgage Servicing Rights, continued

(in thousands)	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Core deposit intangibles:
Gross carrying amount	$	29,015		$	25,345
Accumulated amortization		(10,392	)		(8,244	)
Net book value	$	18,623		$	17,101
Additions during the period	$	3,670		$	17,259
Amortization during the period	$	2,148		$	3,189
Other intangibles:
Gross carrying amount	$	4,363		$	4,363
Accumulated amortization		(461	)		(269	)
Net book value	$	3,902		$	4,094
Additions during the period	$	-		$	4,363
Amortization during the period	$	192		$	269

Mortgage servicing rights: Mortgage servicing rights are amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income, and assessed for impairment at each reporting date, with the amortization recorded in mortgage income, net, in the consolidated income statements. Mortgage servicing rights are carried at the lower of the initial capitalized amount, net of accumulated amortization, or estimated fair value, and are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Activity in the mortgage servicing rights asset for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and year ended December 31, 2016 was as follows:

(in thousands)	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Mortgage servicing rights (MSR) asset:
MSR asset at beginning of year	$	1,922		$	193
Capitalized MSR		412			1,023
MSR asset acquired		874			885
Amortization during the period		(200	)		(179	)
Valuation allowance at end of period		-			-
Net book value at end of period	$	3,008		$	1,922

Fair value of MSR asset at end of period	$	3,880		$	2,013
Residential mortgage loans serviced for others	$	480,081		$	295,353
Net book value of MSR asset to loans serviced for others		0.63	%		0.65	%

The Company periodically evaluates its mortgage servicing rights asset for impairment. At each reporting date, impairment is assessed based on an estimated fair value using estimated prepayment speeds of the underlying mortgage loans serviced and stratifications based on the risk characteristics of the underlying loans serviced (predominantly loan type and note interest rate). No valuation or impairment charge was recorded for 2016 or year to date 2017.

The following table shows the estimated future amortization expense for amortizing intangible assets. The projections are based on existing asset balances, the current interest rate environment and prepayment speeds as of the June 30, 2017. The actual amortization expense the Company recognizes in any given period may be significantly different depending upon acquisition or sale activities, changes in interest rates, prepayment speeds, market conditions, regulatory requirements and events or circumstances that indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

(in thousands)	Core deposit intangibles		Other intangibles		MSR asset
Year ending December 31,
2017 (remaining six months)	$	2,146	$	193	$	264
2018		3,915		385		529
2019		3,337		385		529
2020		2,657		385		635
2021		2,167		385		294
Thereafter		4,401		2,169		757
Total	$	18,623	$	3,902	$	3,008

Note 8-Notes Payable

The Company had the following long-term notes payable (notes with original maturities of greater than one year):

(in thousands)	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016

Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances	$	21,787	$	1,000
Notes payable	$	21,787	$	1,000

The Company’s FHLB advances bear fixed rates, require interest-only monthly payments, and have maturities ranging from July 2017 to November 2022. The weighted average rates of FHLB advances were 1.75% at June 30, 2017 and 1.17% at December 31, 2016, respectively. FHLB advances are collateralized by a blanket lien on qualifying first mortgages, home equity loans, multi-family loans and certain farmland loans which totaled approximately $281.2 million and $283.8 million at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

The following table shows the maturity schedule of the notes payable as of June 30, 2017:

Maturing in	(in thousands)
2017	$	5,172
2018		1,000
2019		-
2020		10,000
2021		-
2022		5,615
	$	21,787

The Company has a $10 million line of credit with a third party bank, bearing a variable rate of interest based on one-month LIBOR plus a margin, but subject to a floor rate, with quarterly payments of interest only. At June 30, 2017, the available line was $10 million, the rate was one-month LIBOR plus 2.25% with a 3.25% floor. The outstanding balance was zero at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and the line was not used during 2017 or 2016.

Note 9 – Junior Subordinated Debentures

At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company’s carrying value of junior subordinated debentures was $29.3 million and $24.7 million, respectively. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, $28.2 million and $23.7 million, respectively, of guaranteed preferred beneficial interests (“trust preferred securities”) qualify as Tier 1 capital.

In July 2004 Nicolet Bankshares Statutory Trust I (the “Statutory Trust”), issued $6.0 million of trust preferred securities that qualify as Tier 1 capital under Federal Reserve Board guidelines. All of the common securities of the Statutory Trust are owned by the Company. The proceeds from the issuance of the common securities and the trust preferred securities were used by the Statutory Trust to purchase $6.2 million of junior subordinated debentures of the Company, which pay an 8% fixed rate. Interest on these debentures is current. The debentures may be redeemed in part or in full, on or after July 15, 2009 at par plus any accrued but unpaid interest. The maturity date of the debenture, if not redeemed, is July 15, 2034.

In April 2013, as part of the Mid-Wisconsin Financial Services, Inc. (“Mid-Wisconsin”) acquisition, the Company assumed $10.3 million of junior subordinated debentures issued in December 2005 by Mid-Wisconsin, related to $10.0 million of trust preferred securities issued by a statutory trust, whose common securities were wholly owned by Mid-Wisconsin. These trust preferred securities and debentures mature on December 15, 2035 and have a floating rate of the three-month LIBOR plus 1.43%, adjusted quarterly. Interest on these debentures is current. The interest rates were 2.68% and 2.39% as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The debentures may be called at par plus any accrued but unpaid interest, in part or in full, on or after December 15, 2010. At acquisition the debentures were recorded at an initial fair market value of $5.8 million, with the initial $4.5 million discount being accreted to interest expense over the remaining life of the debentures. At June 30, 2017, the carrying value of these junior debentures was $6.7 million.

As part of the 2016 acquisition of Baylake, the Company assumed $16.6 million of junior subordinated debentures related to $16.1 million of issued trust preferred securities. The trust preferred securities and the debentures mature on September 30, 2036 and have a floating rate of three-month LIBOR plus 1.35% adjusted quarterly. Interest on these debentures is current. The interest rates were 2.65% and 2.35% as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 respectively. The debentures may be redeemed on any interest payment date at par in part or in full, on or after June 30, 2011. At acquisition in April 2016 the debentures were recorded at fair value of $11.8 million, with the discount being accreted to interest expense over the remaining life of the debentures. At June 30, 2017, the carrying value of these junior debentures was $12.1 million.

Note 9 – Junior Subordinated Debentures, continued

As part of the 2017 acquisition of First Menasha, the Company assumed $5.2 million of junior subordinated debentures related to $5.0 million of issued trust preferred securities. The trust preferred securities and the debentures mature on March 17, 2034 and have a floating rate of three-month LIBOR plus 2.79% adjusted quarterly. Interest on these debentures is current. The interest rate was 4.06% as of June 30, 2017. The debentures may be redeemed on any interest payment date at par in part or in full, on any interest payment date. At acquisition in April 2017 the debentures were recorded at fair value of $4.4 million, with the discount being accreted to interest expense over the remaining life of the debentures. At June 30, 2017, the carrying value of these junior debentures was $4.4 million.

The debentures represent the sole asset of the respective statutory trusts. The statutory trusts are not included in the consolidated financial statements. The net effect of all the documents entered into with respect to the trust preferred securities is that the Company, through payment on its debentures, is liable for the distributions and other payments required on the trust preferred securities.

Note 10 – Subordinated Notes

In 2015 the Company placed an aggregate of $12 million in subordinated Notes in private placements with certain accredited investors. All Notes were issued with 10-year maturities, have a fixed annual interest rate of 5% payable quarterly, are callable on or after the fifth anniversary of their respective issuances dates, and qualify for Tier 2 capital for regulatory purposes. At June 30, 2017, the carrying value of these subordinated notes was $11.9 million.

The $180,000 debt issuance costs associated with the $12 million Notes are being amortized on a straight line basis over the first five years, representing the no-call periods, as additional interest expense. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, $97,000 and $115,000, of unamortized debt issuance costs remain and are reflected as a deduction to the carrying value of the outstanding debt.

Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements

Fair value represents the estimated price at which an orderly transaction to sell an asset or transfer a liability would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions (i.e. an exit price concept), and is a market-based measurement versus an entity-specific measurement.

As provided for by accounting standards, the Company records and/or discloses financial instruments on a fair value basis. These financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the observability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are: Level 1 - quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that a company has the ability to access at the measurement date; Level 2 - inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels, the level within which the entire fair value measurement will be categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety; this assessment of the significance of an input requires management judgment.

Disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments, whether recognized or not recognized in the balance sheet, is required for those instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value, with the exception of certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments as provided for by the accounting standards. For financial instruments recognized at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets, the fair value disclosure requirements also apply.

Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements, continued

Recurring basis fair value measurements:

The following table presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the periods presented. During 2017, three securities classified as Level 3 were acquired with the First Menasha acquisition in the second quarter of 2017 with a fair value of $0.2 million, and two securities classified as Level 3 had a change in fair values during the second quarter of 2017 due to pay downs.

			Fair Value Measurements Using
Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
(in thousands)
U.S. government sponsored enterprises	$	26,152	$	-	$	26,152	$	-
State, county and municipals		191,128		-		190,408		720
Mortgage-backed securities		165,671		-		165,643		28
Corporate debt securities		32,796		-		24,293		8,503
Equity securities		2,539		2,539		-		-
Securities AFS, June 30, 2017	$	418,286	$	2,539	$	406,496	$	9,251

(in thousands)
U.S. government sponsored enterprises	$	1,963	$	-	$	1,963	$	-
State, county and municipals		187,243		-		186,717		526
Mortgage-backed securities		159,129		-		159,076		53
Corporate debt securities		12,169		-		3,640		8,529
Equity securities		4,783		4,783		-		-
Securities AFS, December 31, 2016	$	365,287	$	4,783	$	351,396	$	9,108

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used by the Company for the Securities AFS noted in the tables of this footnote. Where quoted market prices on securities exchanges are available, the investment is classified as Level 1. Level 1 investments primarily include exchange-traded equity securities available for sale. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is generally determined using prices obtained from independent pricing vendors who use pricing models (with typical inputs including benchmark yields, reported trades for similar securities, issuer spreads or relationship to other benchmark quoted securities), or discounted cash flows, and are classified as Level 2. Examples of these investments include mortgage-related securities and obligations of state, county and municipals. Finally, in certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the estimated fair value, investments are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. Examples of these include private municipal bonds and corporate debt securities, which include trust preferred security investments. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, it was determined that carrying value was the best approximation of fair value for all of the Level 3 securities, based primarily on the internal analysis on these securities.

Nonrecurring basis fair value measurements:

The following table presents the Company’s impaired loans and other real estate owned (“OREO”) measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis for the periods presented.

Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

			Fair Value Measurements Using
(in thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
June 30, 2017:
Impaired loans	$	16,491	$	-	$	-	$	16,491
OREO		1,849		-		-		1,849
December 31, 2016:
Impaired loans	$	19,217	$	-	$	-	$	19,217
OREO		2,059		-		-		2,059

Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements, continued

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used by the Company for the items noted in the table above, including the general classification of such instruments in the fair value hierarchy. For individually evaluated impaired loans, the amount of impairment is based upon the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral for collateral-dependent loans, or the estimated liquidity of the note. For OREO, the fair value is based upon the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral adjusted for the expected costs to sell.

Financial instruments:

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are shown below.

June 30, 2017
(in thousands)	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	111,642	$	111,642	$	111,642	$	-	$	-
Certificates of deposit in other banks		2,985		2,982		-		2,982		-
Securities AFS		418,286		418,286		2,539		406,496		9,251
Other investments		12,939		12,939		-		11,244		1,695
Loans held for sale		6,568		6,681		-		6,681		-
Loans, net		1,997,373		2,007,647		-		-		2,007,647
BOLI		63,460		63,460		63,460		-		-
MSR asset		3,008		3,880		-		-		3,880

Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	2,389,971	$	2,389,759	$	-	$	-	$	2,389,759
Notes payable		21,787		21,860		-		21,860		-
Junior subordinated debentures		29,377		29,035		-		-		29,035
Subordinated notes		11,903		11,547		-		-		11,547

December 31, 2016
(in thousands)	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	129,103	$	129,103	$	129,103	$	-	$	-
Certificates of deposit in other banks		3,984		3,992		-		3,992		-
Securities AFS		365,287		365,287		4,783		351,396		9,108
Other investments		17,499		17,499		-		15,779		1,720
Loans held for sale		6,913		6,968		-		6,968		-
Loans, net		1,557,087		1,568,676		-		-		1,568,676
BOLI		54,134		54,134		54,134		-		-
MSR asset		1,922		2,013		-		-		2,013

Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	1,969,986	$	1,969,973	$	-	$	-	$	1,969,973
Notes payable		1,000		1,002		-		1,002		-
Junior subordinated debentures		24,732		24,095		-		-		24,095
Subordinated notes		11,885		11,459		-		-		11,459

The following is a description of the evaluation methodologies used in the table above.

Cash and cash equivalents: For these short-term instruments the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Certificates of deposits in other banks: Fair values are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on current interest rates being offered by instruments with similar terms and represents a Level 2 measurement.

Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements, continued

Other investments: The carrying amount of Federal Reserve Bank, Bankers Bank, Farmer Mac, and FHLB stock is a reasonably accepted fair value estimate given their restricted nature. Fair value is the redeemable (carrying) value based on the redemption provisions of the instruments which is considered a Level 2 measurement. The carrying amount of the remaining other investments (particularly common stocks of companies or other banks that are not publicly traded) approximates their fair value, determined primarily by analysis of company financial statements and recent capital issuances of the respective companies or banks, if any, and represents a Level 3 measurement.

Loans held for sale: The fair value estimation process for the loans held for sale portfolio is segregated by loan type. The estimated fair value was based on what secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics and represents a Level 2 measurement.

Loans, net: For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk or other optionality, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for all other loans are estimated by discounting contractual cash flows using estimated market discount rates, which reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan. Collateral-dependent impaired loans are included in loans, net. The fair value of loans is considered to be a Level 3 measurement due to internally developed discounted cash flow measurements.

BOLI: The fair value of BOLI approximates the carrying amount because upon liquidation of the investments the Company would receive the cash surrender value which equals the carrying amount.

Mortgage servicing rights asset: To estimate the fair value of the MSR asset, the underlying serviced loan pools are stratified by interest rate tranche and term of the loan, and a valuation model is used to calculate the present value of expected future cash flows for each stratum. When the carrying value of the MSR asset related to a stratum exceeds its fair value, the stratum is recorded at fair value. The valuation model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, such as costs to service, a discount rate, ancillary income, default rates and losses, and prepayment speeds. Although some of these assumptions are based on observable market data, other assumptions are based on unobservable estimates of what market participants would use to measure fair value. As a result, the fair value measurement of mortgage servicing rights is considered a Level 3 measurement and represents an income approach to fair value.

Deposits: The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity (such as demand deposits, savings, interest and non-interest checking, and money market accounts) is, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market place on certificates of similar remaining maturities. Use of internal discounted cash flows provides a Level 3 fair value measurement.

Notes payable: The fair value of the Federal Home Loan Bank advances is obtained from the Federal Home Loan Bank which uses a discounted cash flow analysis based on current market rates of similar maturity debt securities and represents a Level 2 measurement. The fair values of any remaining notes payable are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on current interest rates being offered by instruments with similar terms and credit quality which represents a Level 3 measurement.

Junior subordinated debentures and subordinated notes: The fair values of these debt instruments utilize a discounted cash flow analysis based on an estimate of current interest rates being offered by instruments with similar terms and credit quality. Since the market for these instruments is limited, the internal evaluation represents a Level 3 measurement.

Off-balance-sheet instruments: The estimated fair value of letters of credit at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was insignificant. Loan commitments on which the committed interest rate is less than the current market rate are also insignificant at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

Limitations: Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Fair value estimates may not be realizable in an immediate settlement of the instrument. In some instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments, in which case fair values may be based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques, or based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of the financial instruments, or other factors. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimate of future cash flows. Subsequent changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in Green Bay, Wisconsin, providing a diversified range of traditional banking and wealth management services to individuals and businesses in its market area and through the 38 branch offices of its banking subsidiary, Nicolet National Bank, in northeastern and central Wisconsin and Menominee, Michigan.

Overview

At June 30, 2017, Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Nicolet” or the “Company”) had total assets of $2.8 billion, loans of $2.0 billion, deposits of $2.4 billion and total stockholders’ equity of $352 million, representing increases over December 31, 2016 of 23%, 28%, 21% and 28% in assets, loans, deposits and total equity, respectively. This balance sheet growth was predominately attributable to the April 28, 2017 acquisition of First Menasha Bancshares, Inc. (“First Menasha”), which added assets of $479 million (about 20% of Nicolet’s pre-merger asset size), loans of $351 million, deposits of $375 million, core deposit intangible of $4 million and goodwill of $40 million (as of the consummation date and based on estimated fair values), for a total purchase price that included the issuance of $62 million of common equity (or 1.3 million shares) and $19 million of cash, and which is further described in Note 2, “Acquisitions” of the notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, net income was $14.5 million, and net income available to common shareholders was $14.5 million or $1.53 per diluted common share. Evaluation of financial performance between 2017 and 2016 periods was impacted in general from the timing of the 2017 acquisition and the 2016 acquisitions, and inclusion of non-recurring merger-based expenses and integration costs, as described under the section “Management’s Discussion and Analysis.”

Nicolet’s profitability is significantly dependent upon net interest income (interest income earned on loans and other interest-earning assets such as investments, net of interest expense on deposits and other borrowed funds), and noninterest income sources (including but not limited to service charges on deposits, trust and brokerage fees, mortgage income from sales of residential mortgages into the secondary market, and other fees or revenue from financial services provided to customers or ancillary to loans and deposits), offset by the level of the provision for loan losses, noninterest expenses (largely employee compensation and overhead expenses tied to processing and operating the Bank’s business), and income taxes. Business volumes and pricing drive revenue potential and tend to be influenced by overall economic factors, including market interest rates, business spending, consumer confidence, economic growth and competitive conditions within the marketplace.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements made in this document and in any documents that are incorporated by reference which are not purely historical are forward-looking statements, as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including any statements regarding descriptions of management’s plans, objectives, or goals for future operations, products or services, and forecasts of its revenues, earnings, or other measures of performance. Forward-looking statements are based on current management expectations and, by their nature, are subject to risks and uncertainties. These statements generally may be identified by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “estimate,” “should,” “will,” “intend,” or similar expressions. Shareholders should note that many factors, some of which are discussed elsewhere in this document, could affect the future financial results of Nicolet and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements contained in this document. These factors, many of which are beyond Nicolet’s control, include, but are not necessarily limited to the following:

operating, legal and regulatory risks, including the effects of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and regulations promulgated thereunder, as well as the rules by the Federal bank regulatory agencies to implement the Basel III capital accord;

economic, political and competitive forces affecting Nicolet’s banking and wealth management businesses;

changes in interest rates, monetary policy and general economic conditions, which may impact Nicolet’s net interest income;

potential difficulties in integrating the operations of Nicolet with those of acquired entities, if any;

compliance or operational risks related to new products, services, ventures, or lines of business, if any, that Nicolet may pursue or implement; and

the risk that Nicolet’s analyses of these risks and forces could be incorrect and/or that the strategies developed to address them could be unsuccessful.

These factors should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on such statements. Nicolet specifically disclaims any obligation to update factors or to publicly announce the results of revisions to any of the forward-looking statements or comments included herein to reflect future events or developments.

Branch Closures

In April 2017, Nicolet closed one branch in conjunction with the 2017 acquisition due to overlapping geography. In March 2017, Nicolet closed two branches, one in close proximity to another Nicolet branch and one that was an outlier branch. Nicolet closed seven branches in 2016 that were in close proximity to other Nicolet branches, one concurrent with the Baylake merger, one in October and five in December 2016. As a result, Nicolet operates 38 branches in Northeast and Central Wisconsin and the upper peninsula of Michigan as of June 30, 2017. Nicolet started its effort to eliminate costs associated with branches in overlapping or outlier geographies in 2015 from its acquisition activity, and will continue to evaluate opportunities for efficiencies.

Critical Accounting Policies

The consolidated financial statements of Nicolet are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP and follow general practices within the industry in which it operates. This preparation requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the consolidated financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, actual results could differ from the estimates, assumptions and judgments reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments and, as such, have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change include the valuation of loans acquired in business combinations, as well as the determination of the allowance for loan losses and income taxes and, therefore, are critical accounting policies.

Valuation of Loans Acquired in Business Combinations

Acquisitions accounted for under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, require the use of the acquisition method of accounting. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are recorded at estimated fair value on their purchase date. In particular, the valuation of acquired loans involves significant estimates, assumptions and judgment based on information available as of the acquisition date. Substantially all loans acquired in the transaction are evaluated either individually or in pools of loans with similar characteristics; and since the estimated fair value of acquired loans includes a credit consideration, no carryover of any previously recorded allowance for loan losses is recorded at acquisition. A number of factors are considered in determining the estimated fair value of purchased loans including, among other things, the remaining life of the acquired loans, estimated prepayments, estimated loss ratios, estimated value of the underlying collateral, estimated holding periods, contractual interest rates compared to market interest rates, and net present value of cash flows expected to be received.

In determining the Day 1 Fair Values of acquired loans, management calculates a non-accretable difference (the credit mark component of the acquired loans) and an accretable difference (the market rate or yield component of the acquired loans). The non-accretable difference is the difference between the undiscounted contractually required payments and the undiscounted cash flows expected to be collected in accordance with management’s determination of the Day 1 Fair Values. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows will generally result in a provision for loan losses. Subsequent increases in cash flows will result in a reversal of the provision for loan losses to the extent of prior charges and then an adjustment to the accretable and non-accretable differences, which would have a positive impact on interest income.

The accretable yield on acquired loans is the difference between the expected cash flows and the initial investment in the acquired loans. The accretable yield is recognized into earnings through interest income using the effective yield method over the term of the loans. Management separately monitors the acquired loan portfolio and periodically reviews loans contained within this portfolio against the factors and assumptions used in determining the Day 1 Fair Values.

Allowance for Loan Losses (“ALLL”)

The ALLL is a reserve for estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans determined to be impaired as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Actual credit losses, net of recoveries, are deducted from the ALLL. Loans are charged off when management believes that the collectability of the principal is unlikely. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the ALLL. A provision for loan losses, which is a charge against earnings, is recorded to bring the ALLL to a level that, in management’s judgment, is adequate to absorb probable losses in the loan portfolio. Management’s evaluation process used to determine the appropriateness of the ALLL is subject to the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgment. The evaluation process involves gathering and interpreting many qualitative and quantitative factors which could affect probable credit losses. Because interpretation and analysis involves judgment, current economic or business conditions can change, and future events are inherently difficult to predict, the anticipated amount of estimated loan losses and therefore the appropriateness of the ALLL could change significantly.

The allocation methodology applied by Nicolet is designed to assess the appropriateness of the ALLL and includes allocations for specifically identified impaired loans and loss factor allocations for all remaining loans, with a component primarily based on historical loss rates and a component primarily based on other qualitative factors. The methodology includes evaluation and consideration of several factors, such as, but not limited to, management’s ongoing review and grading of loans, facts and issues related to specific loans, historical loan loss and delinquency experience, trends in past due and nonaccrual loans, existing risk characteristics of specific loans or loan pools, the fair value of underlying collateral, current economic conditions and other qualitative and quantitative factors which could affect potential credit losses. While management uses the best information available to make its evaluation, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if there are significant changes in economic conditions or circumstances underlying the collectability of loans. Because each of the criteria used is subject to change, the allocation of the ALLL is made for analytical purposes and is not necessarily indicative of the trend of future loan losses in any particular loan category. The total allowance is available to absorb losses from any segment of the loan portfolio. Management believes the ALLL is appropriate at June 30, 2017. The allowance analysis is reviewed by the board of directors on a quarterly basis in compliance with regulatory requirements. In addition, various regulatory agencies periodically review the ALLL. These agencies may require Nicolet to make additions to the ALLL based on their judgments of collectability based on information available to them at the time of their examination. Acquired loans were purchased at fair value without any ALLL, and subsequent to acquisition such acquired loans will be evaluated and ALLL will be recorded on them to the extent necessary.

Income Taxes

The assessment of income tax assets and liabilities involves the use of estimates, assumptions, interpretation, and judgment concerning certain accounting pronouncements and federal and state tax codes. There can be no assurance that future events, such as court decisions or positions of federal and state taxing authorities, will not differ from management’s current assessment, the impact of which could be significant to the consolidated results of operations and reported earnings.

Nicolet files a consolidated federal income tax return and a combined state income tax return (both of which include Nicolet and its wholly owned subsidiaries). Accordingly, amounts equal to tax benefits of those companies having taxable federal losses or credits are reimbursed by the companies that incur federal tax liabilities. Amounts provided for income tax expense are based on income reported for financial statement purposes and do not necessarily represent amounts currently payable under tax laws. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually for differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax law rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through provision for income tax expense. Valuation allowances are established when it is more likely than not that a portion of the full amount of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In assessing the ability to realize deferred tax assets, management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies. Nicolet may also recognize a liability for unrecognized tax benefits from uncertain tax positions. Unrecognized tax benefits represent the differences between a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and the benefit recognized and measured in the financial statements. Penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are classified as income tax expense.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

The following discussion is Nicolet management’s analysis of the consolidated financial condition as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and results of operations for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. It should be read in conjunction with Nicolet’s audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and for the three years ended December 31, 2016, included in Nicolet’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Evaluation of financial performance and average balances between 2017 and 2016 was impacted in general from the timing of the 2017 and 2016 acquisitions. Since the balances and results of operations of the acquired entities are appropriately not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements until their consummation dates, income statement results and average balances for 2017 included full contributions from the 2016 acquisitions and no or partial contributions from the 2017 acquisition. Similarly for 2016 income statement and average balance results, the 2016 acquisitions provided no to partial contributions and the 2017 acquisition provided no contribution.

The inclusion of the Baylake balance sheet (at about 83% of Nicolet’s then pre-merger asset size) and operational results for approximately eight months in 2016 (and approximately two months in the six month period ended June 30, 2016) analytically explains most of the increase in certain average balances and income statement line items between 2017 and 2016 periods. To a lesser extent, the inclusion of the First Menasha balance sheet (at about 20% of Nicolet’s then pre-merger asset size) and operational results for approximately two months in 2017 analytically explains a portion of the increase in certain average balances and income statement line items between 2017 and 2016 periods. The 2016 financial advisory business acquisition primarily impacts the brokerage fee income, personnel expense and certain other expense line items. Last, the 2016 and 2017 acquisitions impacted pre-tax net income by inclusion of non-recurring direct merger expenses of approximately $1.3 million in 2016 ($0.4 million, $0.4 million, $0.1 million and $0.4 million in first through fourth quarters, respectively) and $0.5 million in 2017 ($0.2 million and $0.3 million in the first and second quarters, respectively), along with a $1.7 million lease termination charge in second quarter 2016 related to a Nicolet branch closed concurrent with the Baylake merger.

Nicolet remains focused on gaining efficiencies from its increased scale from the acquisitions, as well as on organic growth in our expanded markets and in brokerage services.

Performance Summary

Nicolet reported net income of $14.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, a 146% increase over $5.9 million for the first six months of 2016. Net income available to common shareholders was $14.5 million, or $1.53 per diluted common share for the first half of 2017. Comparatively, after $386,000 of preferred stock dividends, net income available to common shareholders was $5.5 million, or $0.91 per diluted common share for the first half of 2016. Beginning March 1, 2016, the annual dividend rate on preferred stock moved from 1% to 9% in accordance with the contractual terms. Nicolet redeemed its outstanding preferred stock in full in September 2016, explaining the difference in preferred stock dividends between the six-month periods.

The results for the first six months of 2017 include full contributions from the 2016 acquisitions and approximately two months from First Menasha, while the comparative 2016 period includes approximately two months from the 2016 acquisitions and nothing from First Menasha.

Net interest income was $45.8 million for the first half of 2017, an increase of $18.6 million or 69% over the first six months of 2016, including $4.2 million higher aggregate discount accretion income between the periods. The improvement was primarily the result of favorable volume and mix variances (driven by the addition of acquired net interest-earning assets albeit at lower yields, as well as organic growth), and net favorable rate variances, largely from higher earning asset yields and a lower cost of funds. On a tax-equivalent basis, the earning asset yield was 4.67% for the first six months of 2017, 34 basis points (“bps”) higher than the comparable period in 2016, influenced by more earning assets in loans and investments than in low-earning cash and higher aggregate discount accretion income. The cost of funds was 0.50% for the first half of 2017, 14 bps lower than 2016, driven by a lower cost of deposits (largely due to the addition of Baylake deposits at lower rates) between the comparable periods. As a result, the interest rate spread was 4.17% for the first half of 2017, 48 bps higher than the comparable period in 2016. The net interest margin was 4.29%, 45 bps over the first half of 2016.

Noninterest income was $15.9 million for the first half of 2017, an increase of $5.6 million over the first half of 2016, aided largely by the 2016 acquisitions and, to a lesser extent, the 2017 acquisition. Excluding net gains on sale or write-down of assets from both periods, noninterest income increased $4.9 million or 49%. Brokerage fee income led the increase, growing $1.6 million or 145%, attributable to the 2016 financial advisor business acquisition and subsequent new growth. Between the six-month periods, increases due primarily to higher volumes and activity were also experienced in service charges on deposits (up $0.7 million or 46%), net mortgage income (up $0.5 million or 32%), trust fee income (up $0.3 million or 12%) and other income (up $1.4 million, including $0.9 million or 69% higher interchange income).

Noninterest expense for the first half of 2017 was $38.6 million (including $0.5 million attributable to non-recurring merger-based expenses) compared to $27.5 million for the comparable period in 2016 (including $2.5 million merger-related expenses). Excluding the noted merger-based expenses from both periods, noninterest expense increased approximately $13 million or 52%. The increase between the six-month periods was primarily due to a larger operating base, attributable to the acquisitions. Personnel expense accounted for the majority of the increase in total expense, up $6.7 million or 47% over the first six months of 2016, commensurate with the 46% increase in average full time equivalent employees for the comparable periods.

Loans were $2.01 billion at June 30, 2017, up $441 million or 28% from $1.57 billion at December 31, 2016, and up $449 million or 29% over June 30, 2016, largely driven by $351 million of loans acquired with First Menasha at acquisition. Excluding the impact of First Menasha, loans increased $90 million or 6% organically since year end 2016. Between the comparative six-month periods, average loans were $1.74 billion yielding 5.25% in 2017, compared to $1.13 billion yielding 5.01% in 2016, a 55% increase in average balances. The 24 bps increase in loan yield was largely due to $4.2 million of higher aggregate discount accretion income on acquired loans between the six-month periods (inclusive of $2.9 million higher discount income related to favorably resolved purchased credit impaired loans), partially offset by pressure on rates of new and renewing loans in the competitive rate environment.

Total deposits were $2.39 billion at June 30, 2017, up $420 million or 21% from $1.97 billion at December 31, 2016, and up $456 million or 24% over June 30, 2016, primarily due to $375 million of deposits acquired with First Menasha at acquisition). Excluding the impact of First Menasha, deposits increased $45 million or 2% since year end 2016. Between the comparative six-month periods, average total deposits were up $717 million or 53%, attributable to the acquisitions, with noninterest-bearing demand deposits representing 23% and 21% of total deposits for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Interest-bearing deposits cost 0.36% for the first half of 2017, down 11 bps from 0.47% for the same period in 2016, benefiting mostly from the lower-costing Baylake deposits acquired, offset partly by the higher-costing First Menasha deposits acquired and general rate pressures influenced by a 75 bps increase in the federal funds rate since June 30, 2016.

Asset quality measures remained strong with continued improvement during the six months ended June 30, 2017. Nonperforming assets were $18.8 million at June 30, 2017, compared to $22.3 million at year end 2016 and $27.3 million a year ago. As a percentage of total assets, nonperforming assets were 0.66% at June 30, 2017, 0.97% at December 31, 2016, and 1.21% at June 30, 2016. The allowance for loan losses was $12.6 million at June 30, 2017 (representing 0.63% of loans), compared to $11.8 at December 31, 2016 (representing 0.75% of loans), and $10.9 million at June 30, 2016 (representing 0.70% of loans). The decline in the ratio of the ALLL to loans primarily resulted from recording the acquired loan portfolios at fair value with no carryover of allowance at the time of each merger. The provision for loan losses was $0.9 million with net charge-offs of $0.1 million for the first six months of 2017, versus provision of $0.9 million and $0.3 million of net charge-offs for the comparable 2016 period.

Net Interest Income

Nicolet’s earnings are substantially dependent on net interest income. Net interest income is the primary source of Nicolet’s revenue and is the difference between interest income earned on interest earning assets, such as loans and investments, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and other borrowings. Net interest income is directly impacted by the sensitivity of the balance sheet to changes in interest rates and by the amount and composition of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, including characteristics such as the fixed or variable nature of the financial instruments, contractual maturities, and repricing frequencies.

Net interest income in the consolidated statements of income (which excludes any taxable equivalent adjustment) was $45.8 million in the first six months of 2017, $18.6 million or 69% higher than $27.2 million in the first six months of 2016, including $4.2 million higher aggregate discount accretion between the periods and impacted by the timing of the acquisitions (with 2017 including two months of First Menasha and full contribution from Baylake, while the 2016 period included only two months from Baylake). Taxable equivalent adjustments (adjustments to bring tax-exempt interest to a level that would yield the same after-tax income had that been subject to a 35% tax rate) were $1.2 million and $0.7 million for the first six months of 2017 and 2016, respectively, resulting in taxable equivalent net interest income of $47.0 million and $27.9 million, respectively.

Taxable equivalent net interest income is a non-GAAP measure, but is a preferred industry measurement of net interest income (and its use in calculating a net interest margin) as it enhances the comparability of net interest income arising from taxable and tax-exempt sources.

Table 1: Year-To-Date Net Interest Income Analysis

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017							2016
(in thousands)	Average Balance		Interest		Average Rate			Average Balance		Interest		Average Rate
ASSETS
Earning assets
Loans, including loan fees (1)(2)	$	1,744,808	$	45,956		5.25	%	$	1,128,951	$	28,496		5.01	%
Investment securities
Taxable		229,801		2,308		2.01	%		121,373		1,166		1.92	%
Tax-exempt (2)		160,739		2,160		2.69	%		107,630		1,296		2.41	%
Other interest-earning assets		47,816		730		3.05	%		86,268		555		1.29	%
Total interest-earning assets		2,183,164	$	51,154		4.67	%		1,444,222	$	31,513		4.33	%
Cash and due from banks		47,825							32,435
Other assets		224,395							122,196
Total assets	$	2,455,384						$	1,598,853
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities
Savings	$	239,212	$	142		0.12	%	$	168,030	$	106		0.13	%
Interest-bearing demand		408,011		831		0.41	%		281,960		859		0.61	%
MMA		568,335		544		0.19	%		362,657		236		0.13	%
Core CDs and IRAs		284,054		973		0.69	%		223,988		1,074		0.96	%
Brokered deposits		94,647		362		0.77	%		28,522		203		1.43	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		1,594,259		2,852		0.36	%		1,065,157		2,478		0.47	%
Other interest-bearing liabilities		59,511		1,268		4.24	%		58,826		1,097		3.68	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,653,770		4,120		0.50	%		1,123,983		3,575		0.64	%
Noninterest-bearing demand		478,493							290,448
Other liabilities		18,291							13,829
Total equity		304,830							170,593
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	2,455,384						$	1,598,853
Net interest income and rate spread			$	47,034		4.17	%			$	27,938		3.69	%
Net interest margin						4.29	%						3.84	%

(1)

Nonaccrual loans are included in the daily average loan balances outstanding.

(2)

The yield on tax-exempt loans and tax-exempt investment securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 35% and adjusted for the disallowance of interest expense.

Table 2: Year-To-Date Volume/Rate Variance

Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2017 versus the six months ended June 30, 2016 follows:

	Increase (decrease) Due to Changes in
(in thousands)	Volume			Rate			Net(1)
Earning assets

Loans	$	16,090		$	1,370		$	17,460
Investment securities
Taxable		1,202			(60	)		1,142
Tax-exempt(2)		699			165			864
Other interest-earning assets		(67	)		242			175

Total interest-earning assets	$	17,924		$	1,717		$	19,641

Interest-bearing liabilities
Savings deposits	$	43		$	(7	)	$	36
Interest-bearing demand		310			(338	)		(28	)
MMA		168			140			308
Core CDs and IRAs		248			(349	)		(101	)
Brokered deposits		289			(130	)		159

Total interest-bearing deposits		1,058			(684	)		374
Other interest-bearing liabilities		260			(89	)		171

Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,318			(773	)		545
Net interest income	$	16,606		$	2,490		$	19,096

(1)

Nonaccrual loans are included in the daily average loan balances outstanding.

(2)

The yield on tax-exempt loans and tax-exempt investment securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 35% and adjusted for the disallowance of interest expense.

Table 3: Quarterly Net Interest Income Analysis

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017							2016
(in thousands)	Average Balance		Interest		Average Rate			Average Balance		Interest		Average Rate
ASSETS
Earning assets
Loans, including loan fees (1)(2)	$	1,888,320	$	24,771		5.20	%	$	1,372,866	$	16,904		4.84	%
Investment securities
Taxable		250,539		1,239		1.98	%		165,148		762		1.84	%
Tax-exempt (2)		162,154		1,098		2.71	%		127,724		778		2.43	%
Other interest-earning assets		35,111		376		4.28	%		95,536		362		0.94	%
Total interest-earning assets		2,336,124	$	27,484		4.67	%		1,761,274	$	18,806		4.18	%
Cash and due from banks		54,925							36,534
Other assets		244,876							173,533
Total assets	$	2,635,925						$	1,971,341
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities
Savings	$	253,377	$	85		0.13	%	$	194,099	$	55		0.11	%
Interest-bearing demand		410,555		429		0.42	%		332,925		452		0.54	%
MMA		584,078		350		0.24	%		466,150		153		0.13	%
Core CDs and IRAs		293,068		463		0.63	%		267,565		561		0.83	%
Brokered deposits		165,992		338		0.82	%		29,161		102		1.39	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		1,707,070		1,665		0.39	%		1,289,900		1,323		0.41	%
Other interest-bearing liabilities		72,296		689		3.78	%		77,836		562		2.82	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,779,366		2,354		0.53	%		1,367,736		1,885		0.55	%
Noninterest-bearing demand		507,795							356,062
Other liabilities		19,563							19,063
Total equity		329,201							228,480
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	2,635,925						$	1,971,341
Net interest income and rate spread			$	25,130		4.14	%			$	16,921		3.63	%
Net interest margin						4.27	%						3.75	%

(1)

Nonaccrual loans are included in the daily average loan balances outstanding.

(2)

The yield on tax-exempt loans and tax-exempt investment securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 35% and adjusted for the disallowance of interest expense.

Table 4: Quarterly Volume/Rate Variance

Comparison of the three months ended June 30, 2017 versus the three months ended June 30, 2016 follows:

	Increase (decrease) Due to Changes in
(in thousands)	Volume			Rate			Net(1)
Earning assets

Loans(2)	$	6,683		$	1,184		$	7,867
Investment securities
Taxable		447			30			477
Tax-exempt(2)		226			94			320
Other interest-earning assets		(169	)		183			14

Total interest-earning assets	$	7,187		$	1,491		$	8,678

Interest-bearing liabilities
Savings deposits	$	19		$	11		$	30
Interest-bearing demand		93			(116	)		(23	)
MMA		46			151			197
Core CDs and IRAs		50			(148	)		(98	)
Brokered deposits		296			(60	)		236

Total interest-bearing deposits		504			(162	)		342
Other interest-bearing liabilities		129			(2	)		127

Total interest-bearing liabilities		633			(164	)		469
Net interest income	$	6,554		$	1,655		$	8,209

(1)

Nonaccrual loans are included in the daily average loan balances outstanding.

(2)

The yield on tax-exempt loans and tax-exempt investment securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 35% and adjusted for the disallowance of interest expense.

Table 5: Interest Rate Spread, Margin and Average Balance Mix — Taxable Equivalent Basis

	Six months Ended June 30,
	2017								2016
(in thousands)	Average Balance		% of Earning Assets			Yield/Rate			Average Balance		% of Earning Assets			Yield/Rate
Total loans	$	1,744,808		79.9	%		5.25	%	$	1,128,951		78.2	%		5.01	%
Securities and other earning assets		438,356		20.1	%		2.37	%		315,271		21.8	%		1.91	%
Total interest-earning assets	$	2,183,164		100.0	%		4.67	%	$	1,444,222		100.0	%		4.33	%

Interest-bearing liabilities	$	1,653,770		75.8	%		0.50	%	$	1,123,983		77.8	%		0.64	%
Noninterest-bearing funds, net		529,394		24.2	%					320,239		22.2	%
Total funds sources	$	2,183,164		100.0	%		0.38	%	$	1,444,222		100.0	%		0.47	%
Interest rate spread							4.17	%							3.69	%
Contribution from net free funds							0.12	%							0.15	%
Net interest margin							4.29	%							3.84	%

Taxable-equivalent net interest income was $47.0 million and $27.9 million for the six months of 2017 and 2016, respectively, up $19.1 million or 68%, with $16.6 million from net favorable volume and mix variances (due to the addition of acquired net interest-earning assets, as well as organic growth), and $2.5 million from net favorable rate variances (from both a lower cost of funds and higher earning asset yield) between the periods. Taxable equivalent interest income on earning assets increased $19.6 million or 62% between the six-month periods, with $17.4 million more interest from loans ($16.1 million from greater volume and $1.4 million from rates (with $4.2 million in higher aggregate discount accretion income more than offsetting lower underlying loan yields mainly from the acquired portfolios)), $2.0 million more interest from total investments (mostly volume-based), and $0.2 million more interest from other earning assets. Interest expense increased $0.5 million, led by $1.3 million higher interest on interest-bearing liabilities due to volume variances (mostly acquired deposits), partially offset by $0.8 million of favorable rate variances due to lower cost funding (largely from lower-costing Baylake deposits acquired, offset partly by higher-costing First Menasha deposits acquired and general rate pressures influenced by a 75 bps increase in the federal funds rate since June 30, 2016).

The taxable-equivalent net interest margin was 4.29% for the first six months of 2017, up 45 bps versus the first six months of 2016. The interest rate spread increased 48 bps between the periods, with a favorable increase in the earning asset yield (up 34 bps to 4.67% for first six months of 2017), and an improvement in the cost of funds (down 14 bps to 0.50% for first six months of 2017). The contribution from net free funds decreased by 3 bps, mostly due to lower costs on the funding side of the balance sheet. Since January 1, 2016, the Federal Reserve raised short-term interest rates by 75 bps to 100 bps as of June 30, 2017 (up 25 bps in each of December 2016, March 2017 and June 2017). These increases have impacted the rate earned on cash and the cost of shorter-term deposits and borrowings, but have not significantly influenced rates further out on the yield curve; and thus, have only marginally impacted new investment yields or new loan pricing. Additionally, while both 2017 and 2016 periods are experiencing favorable income from discount accretion on acquired loans, particularly where such loans pay or resolve at better than their carrying values, such favorable interest flow can be sporadic and will diminish over time.

The earning asset yield was influenced largely by the mix of underlying earning assets, particularly carrying a higher proportion of loans and investments (each at higher yields in the 2017 period than the 2016 period) and a lower proportion of low-earning cash. Loans, investments and other interest earning assets (mostly low-earning cash) represented 80%, 18% and 2% of average earning assets, respectively, for the first six months of 2017, and 78%, 16%, and 6%, respectively, for the comparable 2016 period. Loans yielded 5.25% and 5.01%, respectively, for the first six months of 2017 and 2016, while non-loan earning assets combined yielded 2.37% and 1.91%, respectively, for the periods. The 24 bps increase in loan yield between the six-month periods was largely due to the higher aggregate discount accretion on acquired loans between periods, more than offsetting lower underlying loan yields mainly from the acquired loan portfolios.

Average interest-earning assets were $2.18 billion for the first six months of 2017, $739 million, or 51% higher than the first six months of 2016, largely attributable to acquired balances as well as organic growth. The change consisted of an increase in average loans (up 55% to $1.74 billion), a $162 million increase in investment securities (up 71% to $391 million) and a $38 million decrease in other interest-earning assets, predominantly low earning cash.

Nicolet’s cost of funds decreased 14 bps to 0.50% for the first six months of 2017 compared to a year ago. The average cost of interest-bearing deposits (which represent 96% and 95% of average interest-bearing liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively), was 0.36% for the first six months of 2017, down 11 bps from the first six months of 2016, largely benefiting from the lower-costing Baylake deposits acquired, offset partly by the higher-costing First Menasha deposits acquired and general rate pressures influenced by a 75 bps increase in the federal funds rate since June 30, 2016.

Average interest-bearing liabilities were $1.65 billion for the first six months of 2017, up $530 million or 47% from the comparable period in 2016, predominantly attributable to acquired balances. Interest-bearing deposits represented 96% and 95% of average interest-bearing liabilities for the first six months of 2017 and 2016, respectively, while the mix of average interest-bearing deposits moved from higher costing core CDs to lower costing transaction accounts, improving the overall deposit cost between the six-month periods.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $0.9 million for each period, respectively, exceeding net charge offs of $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively. Asset quality measures have been strong and improving with continued resolutions of problem loans. The ALLL was $12.6 million (0.63% of loans) at June 30, 2017, compared to $11.8 million (0.75% of loans) at December 31, 2016 and $10.9 million (0.70% of loans) at June 30, 2016. The decline in the ratio was a result of recording the acquired loan portfolios at fair value with no carryover of allowance at the time of each merger.

The provision for loan losses is predominantly a function of Nicolet’s methodology and judgment as to qualitative and quantitative factors used to determine the adequacy of the ALLL. The adequacy of the ALLL is affected by changes in the size and character of the loan portfolio, changes in levels of impaired and other nonperforming loans, historical losses and delinquencies in each portfolio segment, the risk inherent in specific loans, concentrations of loans to specific borrowers or industries, existing and future economic conditions, the fair value of underlying collateral, and other factors which could affect potential credit losses. For additional information regarding asset quality and the ALLL, see “Balance Sheet Analysis — Loans,” “— Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses,” and “— Impaired Loans and Nonperforming Assets.”

Noninterest Income

Table 6: Noninterest Income

	For the three months ended June 30,									For the six months ended June 30,
	2017		2016		$ Change		% Change			2017		2016		$ Change		% Change
(in thousands)
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	1,121	$	870	$	251		28.9	%	$	2,129	$	1,463	$	666		45.5	%
Mortgage income, net		1,406		1,132		274		24.2			2,248		1,703		545		32.0
Trust services fee income		1,485		1,465		20		1.4			2,952		2,627		325		12.4
Brokerage fee income		1,433		788		645		81.9			2,692		1,098		1,594		145.2
Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”)		454		312		142		45.5			855		562		293		52.1
Rent income		295		273		22		8.1			567		535		32		6.0
Investment advisory fees		109		95		14		14.7			265		195		70		35.9
Gain on sale or write-down of assets, net		772		100		672		672.0			766		95		671		706.3
Other income		2,010		1,335		675		50.6			3,380		1,970		1,410		71.6
Total noninterest income	$	9,085	$	6,370	$	2,715		42.6	%	$	15,854	$	10,248	$	5,606		54.7	%
Noninterest income without net gains	$	8,313	$	6,270	$	2,043		32.6	%	$	15,088	$	10,153	$	4,935		48.6	%
Included in Other Income:

Debit and credit card interchange income	$	1,173	$	819	$	354		43.2	%	$	2,153	$	1,277	$	876		68.6	%

Comparison of the six months ending June 30, 2017 versus 2016

Noninterest income was $15.9 million for the first six months of 2017, compared to $10.2 million for the first six months of 2016, aided largely by the 2016 acquisitions and, to a lesser extent, the 2017 acquisition. Excluding net gains on sale or write-down of assets from both six-month periods, noninterest income increased $4.9 million or 48.6%.

The 2017 activity in net gain on sale or write-down of assets consisted of a $0.9 million gain on the sale of vacated bank branches, $0.4 million of net losses and write-downs on assets and OREO properties (predominantly the fair market value loss on two closed bank branches transferred to OREO), and a $0.2 million gain on the liquidation of an other investment. The 2016 activity was not significant individually or in the aggregate.

Service charges on deposit accounts were $2.1 million for the first six months of 2017, up $0.7 million or 45.5% over the first six months of 2016, resulting from an increased number of accounts mostly attributable to the bank acquisitions and an increase to the fee charged on overdrafts implemented in May 2017.

Mortgage income represents net gains received from the sale of residential real estate loans service-released and service-retained into the secondary market, capitalized mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”), servicing fees, offsetting MSR amortization, valuation changes, if any, and to a smaller degree some related income. Net mortgage income increased $0.5 million or 32.0% between the comparable six-month periods due to greater secondary mortgage production and sales aided by a broader geographic footprint and increased net servicing fees on the growing portfolio of mortgage loans serviced for others.

Trust service fees were up $0.3 million or 12.4% between the six-month periods due to higher assets under management. Between the six-month periods, brokerage fees were up significantly, up $1.6 million or 145.2%, attributable to the 2016 financial advisor business acquisition as well as subsequent new growth and pricing.

BOLI income was up $0.3 million or 52.1% between the six-month periods, commensurate with the growth in average BOLI investments, including additional insurance purchases in 2016. Other noninterest income was $3.4 million, up $1.4 million or 71.6% over the comparable period of 2016 (mostly attributable to an increase in card interchange fees, up $0.9 million or 68.6% on higher volume and activity), and income from equity in UFS, a data processing company acquired in the Baylake merger, up $0.3 million.

Noninterest Expense

Table 7: Noninterest Expense

	For the three months ended June 30,										For the six months ended June 30,
	2017		2016		$ Change			% Change			2017		2016		$ Change			% Change
(in thousands)
Personnel	$	10,983	$	8,884	$	2,099			23.6	%	$	20,916	$	14,232	$	6,684			47.0	%
Occupancy, equipment and office		3,223		2,508		715			28.5			6,054		4,306		1,748			40.6
Business development and marketing		1,317		790		527			66.7			2,246		1,368		878			64.2
Data processing		2,207		1,421		786			55.3			4,190		2,577		1,613			62.6
FDIC assessments		145		239		(94	)		(39.3	)		377		382		(5	)		(1.3	)
Intangibles amortization		1,178		874		304			34.8			2,341		1,123		1,218			108.5
Other expense		1,260		2,803		(1,543	)		(55.0	)		2,512		3,549		(1,037	)		(29.2	)
Total noninterest expense	$	20,313	$	17,519	$	2,794			15.9	%	$	38,636	$	27,537	$	11,099			40.3	%
Non-Personnel expenses	$	9,330	$	8,635	$	695			8.0	%	$	17,720	$	13,305	$	4,415			33.2	%

Comparison of the six months ending June 30, 2017 versus 2016

Total noninterest expense was $38.6 million for the first six months of 2017 (including $0.5 million attributable to non-recurring, merger-based expenses such as legal and conversion processing costs), compared to $27.5 million for the comparable period in 2016 (including $2.5 million merger-related expenses, of which $1.7 million was a lease termination charge). Excluding the noted merger-based expenses from both periods, noninterest expense increased approximately $13 million or 52%. The $11.1 million, or 40.3%, increase between the six-month periods was primarily attributable to the larger operating base as a result of the 2016 and 2017 acquisitions. All expense categories showed significant increases from the same period in 2016, except for FDIC assessments (down slightly) and other expense, which was down due to reduced merger-related expenses.

Personnel expense was $20.9 million for the first six months of 2017, up $6.7 million or 47.0% compared to the first six months of 2016, largely due to the expanded workforce, with average full time equivalent employees up 46% (from 346 to 505 for the first half of 2016 and 2017, respectively). Also contributing to the increase were merit increases between the periods, incentives timing, equity grants in the second quarter of 2017, and higher health and other benefits costs.

Occupancy, equipment and office expense was $6.1 million for the first six months of 2017, up $1.7 million or 40.6% compared to 2016, primarily the result of the larger operating base, offset partly by branch closure savings.

Business development and marketing expense increased $0.9 million, or 64.2%, between the comparable six-month periods, largely due to the expanded operating base influencing additional marketing, promotions and media.

Data processing expenses, which are primarily volume-based, rose $1.6 million or 62.6% between the six-month periods predominantly attributable to the acquisitions. Intangible amortization increased $1.2 million, due exclusively to timing of and the addition of intangibles recorded as part of the acquisitions.

Other noninterest expense decreased $1.0 million or 29.2% between the six-month periods, due primarily to lower merger-related expenses, including the non-recurring $1.7 million lease termination charge in 2016, though offset largely in 2017 by higher other operating costs associated with size (such as OREO expenses, legal, audit and bank insurance costs) and $0.4 million in 2017 associated with implementing the customer relationship system that began in the fourth quarter of 2016.

Income Taxes

For the six-month periods ending June 30, 2017 and 2016, income tax expense was $7.5 million and $3.0 million, respectively. The increase was primarily attributable to higher pre-tax income between the two periods. Included in 2017 is a tax benefit of $0.2 million related to the exercise of stock options and restricted stock vesting in accordance with ASU 2016-09. U.S. GAAP requires that deferred income taxes be analyzed to determine if a valuation allowance is required. A valuation allowance is required if it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. No valuation allowance was determined to be necessary as of June 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016.

Comparison of the three months ending June 30, 2017 versus 2016

Nicolet reported net income of $8.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, up $5.0 million or 156% over $3.3 million for the comparable period of 2016. Net income available to common shareholders for the second quarter of 2017 was $8.3 million, or $0.83 per diluted common share, compared to net income available to common shareholders of $3.0 million, or $0.39 per diluted common share, for the second quarter of 2016.

Pre-tax earnings of the second quarter of 2016 was negatively impacted by $2.1 million merger-based expenses (inclusive of a large lease-termination charge), compared to $0.3 million of merger-based expense in the second quarter of 2017.

Net interest income in the consolidated statements of income (which excludes any taxable equivalent adjustment) was $24.5 million in the second quarter of 2017 versus $16.5 million in the second quarter of 2016, including $2.1 million higher aggregate discount income between the periods. Taxable equivalent adjustments (adjustments to bring tax-exempt interest to a level that would yield the same after-tax income had that been subject to a 35% tax rate) were $0.6 million and $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, resulting in taxable equivalent net interest income of $25.1 million and $16.9 million, respectively. Taxable equivalent net interest income for second quarter 2017 was up $8.2 million or 49% versus second quarter 2016, with $6.6 million of the increase due to net favorable volume variances (predominately due to the Baylake assets included for three months in 2017 versus two in 2016 and, to a lesser extent, to the First Menasha assets included for two months in 2017 versus none in 2016), and $1.7 million increase from net favorable rate variances (especially in higher loan yields and lower cost of funds).

The earning asset yield was 4.67% for second quarter 2017, 49 bps higher than second quarter 2016, mainly due to an increase in the yield on loans (up 36 bps to 5.20% for second quarter 2017). The 36 bps increase in loan yield between the three-month periods was largely due to higher aggregate discount accretion on loans (up $2.1 million) partially offset by the addition of Baylake loans carrying a lower overall yield and underlying rate pressure on loan yields from competition and the low rate environment. Non-loan earning assets which earn less than loan assets represented 19% of average earning assets for second quarter 2017 (including higher low-earning cash) and earned 2.42%, versus 22% of earning assets yielding 1.96% for second quarter 2016.

The cost of funds was 0.53% for second quarter 2017, 2 bps lower than second quarter 2016, driven by a decline in the cost of deposits (down 2 bps to 0.39% for second quarter 2017) and a higher proportion of deposits in average interest-bearing liabilities (96% versus 94% for second quarter 2017 and 2016, respectively). The decrease in the cost of deposits resulted from lower overall rates on Baylake deposits acquired, and a favorable fair value interest mark on acquired CDs. The cost of other interest-bearing liabilities increased 96 bps to 3.78% between the second quarter periods, mostly due to a higher proportion of higher-cost funding in the mix (such as FHLB advances and other notes payable).

Noninterest income was $9.1 million for second quarter 2017, up $2.7 million from $6.4 million for the second quarter 2016. Noninterest income without net gains was up $2.0 million or 33%, largely due to mortgage income (up $0.3 million given higher production over a broader geographic footprint), service charges on deposits (up $0.3 million given the larger deposit base), and trust and brokerage fees (up $0.7 million combined, mostly attributable to the 2016 financial advisor business acquisition and market improvements). Net gain on sale or write-down of assets for second quarter 2017 consisted of a $0.5 million net gain on the sale of a former bank branch and a $0.2 million gain on the sale of investments, while second quarter 2016 included a $0.1 million net gain on OREO resolutions and gains on sales of assets. The $0.7 million increase in other noninterest income between the second quarter periods included interchange income up $0.4 million and wire fee income up $0.1 million on higher volumes, and UFS, Inc. income up $0.2 million due to the acquisition of this processing business as part of the Baylake merger in April 2016.

Noninterest expense was $20.3 million for the second quarter of 2017, up $2.8 million or 16% from second quarter 2016. Non-recurring merger-based expenses were $0.3 million in second quarter 2017 and $2.1 million in the second quarter of 2016. Excluding the noted merger-based expenses from both periods, noninterest expense increased approximately $4 million or 30%. Salaries and employee benefits for the second quarter of 2017 were $11.0 million or 24% higher than the second quarter of 2016. In addition to merit increases, higher overtime and higher equity award and incentive costs between the comparable second quarter periods, salaries and benefits were up from an increase in average full time equivalent employees attributable to the 2017 acquisition. Occupancy expense was $0.7 million higher due to the increased office locations. Data processing was $0.8 million higher than second quarter 2016 from increased accounts, rate increases and higher plastics processing costs. Amortization of intangibles was $0.3 million higher due to the added intangibles from the 2017 and 2016 acquisitions.

The provision for loan losses was $0.5 million for second quarter 2017 and 2016. Net charge- offs for the quarter ending June 30, 2017 were $0.1 million compared to $0.3 million for the second quarter of 2016. At June 30, 2017, the ALLL was $12.6 million (or 0.63% of total loans) compared to $10.9 million (or 0.70% of total loans) at June 30, 2016. The decline in the ratio was a result of recording the First Menasha loan portfolio at fair value with no carryover of their allowance at the time of the respective mergers.

Income tax expense was $4.4 million and $1.5 million for the second quarters of 2017 and 2016, respectively. The effective tax rates were 34.6% for second quarter 2017 and 31.7% for second quarter 2016.

BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS

Loans

Nicolet services a diverse customer base throughout Northeast and Central Wisconsin and in Menominee, Michigan including the following industries: manufacturing, agriculture, wholesaling, retail, service, and businesses supporting the general building industry. It continues to concentrate its efforts in originating loans in its local markets and assisting its current loan customers. It actively utilizes government loan programs such as those provided by the U.S. Small Business Administration to help customers weather current economic conditions and position their businesses for the future.

Nicolet’s primary lending function is to make 1) commercial loans, consisting of commercial and industrial business loans, agricultural (“AG”) production, and owner-occupied commercial real estate (“CRE”) loans; 2) CRE loans, consisting of commercial investment real estate loans, AG real estate, and construction and land development loans; 3) residential real estate loans, including residential first mortgages, residential junior mortgages (such as home equity loans and lines), and residential construction loans; and 4) retail and other loans. Using these four broad groups the mix of loans at June 30, 2017 was 52% commercial, 22% CRE loans, 25% residential real estate, and 1% retail and other loans; and grouped further the loan mix was 74% commercial-based and 26% retail-based.

Total loans were $2.0 billion at June 30, 2017 compared to $1.6 billion at December 31, 2016. Compared to June 30, 2016, loans grew $449 million or 29%, primarily as a result of the $351 million loans added from First Menasha at acquisition in April 2017. On average, loans were $1.7 billion and $1.1 billion for the first six months of 2017 and 2016, respectively, up 55%, largely attributable to the timing of inclusion of acquired loans. At the time of the merger, the acquired First Menasha loan portfolio was somewhat similar to Nicolet’s pre-merger loan mix, with the most notable differences being a higher mix in owner-occupied CRE and CRE investment and a lower mix in commercial and industrial loans. The majority of organic growth experienced in the first half of 2017 has been in commercial and industrial loans.

Table 8: Period End Loan Composition

	June 30, 2017					December 31, 2016					June 30, 2016
	Amount		% of Total			Amount		% of Total			Amount		% of Total
Commercial & industrial	$	589,460		29.3	%	$	428,270		27.3	%	$	427,093		27.4	%
Owner-occupied CRE		419,066		20.8			360,227		23.0			359,401		23.0
AG production		35,428		1.8			34,767		2.2			32,646		2.1
AG real estate		49,977		2.5			45,234		2.9			53,005		3.4
CRE investment		307,572		15.3			195,879		12.5			199,585		12.8
Construction & land development		85,367		4.3			74,988		4.8			68,957		4.4
Residential construction		29,325		1.4			23,392		1.5			20,434		1.3
Residential first mortgage		369,007		18.4			300,304		19.1			287,722		18.4
Residential junior mortgage		103,935		5.2			91,331		5.8			97,509		6.3
Retail & other		20,827		1.0			14,515		0.9			14,205		0.9
Total loans	$	2,009,964		100.0		$	1,568,907		100.0	%	$	1,560,557		100.0	%

Broadly, loans were 74% commercial-based and 26% retail-based at June 30, 2017 compared to 73% commercial-based and 27% retail-based at December 31, 2016. Commercial-based loans are considered to have more inherent risk of default than retail-based loans, in part because of the broader list of factors that could impact a commercial borrower negatively as well as the commercial balance per borrower is typically larger than that for retail-based loans, implying higher potential losses on an individual customer basis.

Commercial and industrial loans consist primarily of commercial loans to small businesses within a diverse range of industries and, to a lesser degree, to municipalities. The credit risk related to commercial and industrial loans is largely influenced by general economic conditions and the resulting impact on a borrower’s operations, or on the value of underlying collateral, if any. Commercial and industrial loans increased $161 million to $589 million since year end 2016, largely attributable to acquired First Menasha loans. Commercial and industrial loans continue to be the largest segment of Nicolet’s portfolio and increased to 29.3% of the total portfolio at June 30, 2017, up from 27.3% at December 31, 2016, largely attributable to the acquired First Menasha loan mix and organic loan growth.

Owner-occupied CRE loans decreased to 20.8% of loans at June 30, 2017 from 23.0% at December 31, 2016, largely attributable to the acquired First Menasha loan mix. Owner-occupied CRE loans primarily consist of loans within a diverse range of industries secured by business real estate that is occupied by borrowers (i.e. who operate their businesses out of the underlying collateral) and who may also have commercial and industrial loans. The credit risk related to owner-occupied CRE loans is largely influenced by general economic conditions and the resulting impact on a borrower’s operations, or on the value of underlying collateral.

AG production and AG real estate loans combined consist of loans secured by farmland and related farming operations. The credit risk related to agricultural loans is largely influenced by the prices farmers can get for their production and/or the underlying value of the farmland. In total, agricultural loans increased $5 million since year end 2016, representing 4.3% of total loans at June 30, 2017, versus 5.1% at December 31, 2016.

The CRE investment loan classification primarily includes commercial-based mortgage loans that are secured by non-owner occupied, nonfarm/nonresidential real estate properties, and multi-family residential properties. Lending in this segment has been focused on loans that are secured by commercial income-producing properties as opposed to speculative real estate development. The balance of these loans increased $112 million since year end 2016, largely attributable to the acquired First Menasha loan mix and organic growth, representing 15.3% of total loans at June 30, 2017 compared to 12.5% of total loans at December 31, 2016.

Loans in the construction and land development portfolio provide financing for the development of commercial income properties, multi-family residential development, and land designated for future development. Nicolet controls the credit risk on these types of loans by making loans in familiar markets, reviewing the merits of individual projects, controlling loan structure, and monitoring the progress of projects through the analysis of construction advances. Credit risk is managed by employing sound underwriting guidelines, lending primarily to borrowers in local markets, periodically evaluating the underlying collateral, and formally reviewing the borrower’s financial soundness and relationships on an ongoing basis. Lending on originated loans in this category has remained relatively steady as a percent of loans. Since December 31, 2016, balances have increased $10 million, and this category represented 4.3% and 4.8% of total loans at June 30, 2017 and year-end 2016, respectively.

On a combined basis, Nicolet’s residential real estate loans represent 25.0% of total loans at June 30, 2017, down from 26.4% at December 31, 2016. Residential first mortgage loans include conventional first-lien home mortgages. Residential junior mortgage real estate loans consist mainly of home equity lines and term loans secured by junior mortgage liens. Across the industry, home equities generally involve loans that are in second or junior lien positions, but Nicolet has secured many such loans in a first lien position, further mitigating the portfolio risks. Nicolet has not experienced significant losses in its residential real estate loans; however, if market values in the residential real estate markets decline, particularly in Nicolet’s market area, rising loan-to-value ratios could cause an increase in the provision for loan losses. As part of its management of originating residential mortgage loans, the vast majority of Nicolet’s long-term, fixed-rate residential real estate mortgage loans are sold in the secondary market without retaining the servicing rights. Mortgage loans retained in the portfolio are typically of high quality and have historically had low net charge off rates.

Loans in the retail and other classification represent less than 1% of the total loan portfolio, and include predominantly short-term and other personal installment loans not secured by real estate. Credit risk is primarily controlled by reviewing the creditworthiness of the borrowers, monitoring payment histories, and taking appropriate collateral and/or guaranty positions. The loan balances in this portfolio increased $6 million from December 31, 2016 to June 30, 2017.

Factors that are important to managing overall credit quality are sound loan underwriting and administration, systematic monitoring of existing loans and commitments, effective loan review on an ongoing basis, early problem loan identification and remedial action to minimize losses, an adequate ALLL, and sound nonaccrual and charge-off policies. An active credit risk management process is used for commercial loans to further ensure that sound and consistent credit decisions are made. The credit management process is regularly reviewed and the process has been modified over the past several years to further strengthen the controls.

The loan portfolio is widely diversified by types of borrowers, industry groups, and market areas. Significant loan concentrations are considered to exist for a financial institution when there are amounts loaned to multiple numbers of borrowers engaged in similar activities that would cause them to be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions. At June 30, 2017, no significant industry concentrations existed in Nicolet’s portfolio in excess of 25% of total loans. Nicolet has also developed guidelines to manage its exposure to various types of concentration risks.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

In addition to the discussion that follows, see also Note 1, “Basis of Presentation,” and Note 6, “Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality,” in the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the “Critical Accounting Policies” within management’s discussion and analysis.

Credit risks within the loan portfolio are inherently different for each loan type as described under “Balance Sheet Analysis-Loans.” Credit risk is controlled and monitored through the use of lending standards, a thorough review of potential borrowers, and on-going review of loan payment performance. Active asset quality administration, including early problem loan identification and timely resolution of problems, aids in the management of credit risk and minimization of loan losses.

The ALLL is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense to appropriately provide for potential credit losses in the existing loan portfolio. Loans are charged off against the ALLL when management believes that the collection of principal is unlikely. The level of the ALLL represents management’s estimate of an amount of reserves that provides for estimated probable credit losses in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. To assess the ALLL, an allocation methodology is applied by Nicolet which focuses on evaluation of qualitative and environmental factors, including but not limited to: (i) evaluation of facts and issues related to specific loans; (ii) management’s ongoing review and grading of the loan portfolio; (iii) consideration of historical loan loss and delinquency experience on each portfolio segment; (iv) trends in past due and nonperforming loans; (v) the risk characteristics of the various loan segments; (vi) changes in the size and character of the loan portfolio; (vii) concentrations of loans to specific borrowers or industries; (viii) existing and forecasted economic conditions; (ix) the fair value of underlying collateral; and (x) other qualitative and quantitative factors which could affect potential credit losses. Nicolet’s methodology reflects guidance by regulatory agencies to all financial institutions.

Management allocates the ALLL by pools of risk within each loan portfolio segment. The allocation methodology consists of the following components. First, a specific reserve for the estimated shortfall is established for all loans determined to be impaired. The specific reserve in the ALLL is equal to the aggregate collateral or discounted cash flow shortfall calculated from the impairment analyses. Loans measured for impairment include nonaccrual loans, non-performing troubled debt-restructurings (“restructured loans”), or other loans determined to be impaired by management. Second, Nicolet’s management allocates ALLL with historical loss rates by loan segment. The loss factors applied in the methodology are periodically re-evaluated and adjusted to reflect changes in historical loss levels on an annual basis. The look-back period on which the average historical loss rates are determined is a rolling 20-quarter (5 year) average. Lastly, management allocates ALLL to the remaining loan portfolio using the qualitative factors mentioned above. Consideration is given to those current qualitative or environmental factors that are likely to cause estimated credit losses as of the evaluation date to differ from the historical loss experience of each loan segment. Management conducts its allocation methodology on both the originated loans and on the acquired loans separately to account for differences, such as different loss histories and qualitative factors, between the two segments.

Management performs ongoing intensive analyses of its loan portfolio to allow for early identification of customers experiencing financial difficulties, maintains prudent underwriting standards, understands the economy in its markets, and considers the trend of deterioration in loan quality in establishing the level of the ALLL.

Consolidated net income and stockholders’ equity could be affected if management’s estimate of the ALLL necessary to cover expected losses is subsequently materially different, requiring a change in the level of provision for loan losses to be recorded. While management uses currently available information to recognize losses on loans, future adjustments to the ALLL may be necessary based on newly received appraisals, updated commercial customer financial statements, rapidly deteriorating customer cash flow, and changes in economic conditions that affect Nicolet’s customers. As an integral part of their examination process, federal regulatory agencies also review the ALLL. Such agencies may require additions to the ALLL or may require that certain loan balances be charged-off or downgraded into criticized loan categories when their credit evaluations differ from those of management based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.

At June 30, 2017, the ALLL was $12.6 million compared to $11.8 million at December 31, 2016. The six-month increase was a result of a 2017 provision of $0.9 million exceeding 2016 net charge offs of $0.1 million. Comparatively, the provision for loan losses in the first six months of 2016 was $0.9 million and net charge offs were $0.3 million. Annualized net charge offs as a percent of average loans were 0.01% in the first six months of 2017 compared to 0.05% for the first six months of 2016 and 0.02% for the entire 2016 year. Loans charged off are subject to continuous review, and specific efforts are taken to achieve maximum recovery of principal, accrued interest, and related expenses. The level of the provision for loan losses is directly correlated to the assessment of the adequacy of the allowance, including, but not limited to, consideration of the amount of net charge-offs, loan growth, levels of nonperforming loans, and trends in the risk profile of the loan portfolio.

The ratio of the ALLL as a percentage of period-end loans was 0.63% at June 30, 2017 (with a 0.95% ratio on originated loans and a 0.26% ratio on acquired loans) compared to 0.75% at December 31, 2016 (with a 1.05% ratio on originated loans and a 0.36% ratio on acquired loans). The ALLL to loans ratio is impacted by the accounting treatment of Nicolet’s 2013, 2016 and 2017 bank acquisitions, which combined at their acquisition dates added no ALLL to the numerator and $1.3 billion of loans into the denominator. Acquired loans were $937 million and $667 million at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The change in the ALLL to loans ratio was driven by the increase in the denominator from acquired loans in 2016 and 2017.

The largest portions of the ALLL were allocated to commercial & industrial (“C&I”) loans and owner-occupied CRE loans combined, representing 59.0% and 57.5% of the ALLL at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Most notably since December 31, 2016, the increased allocations to C&I (from 33.2% to 37.8%) and CRE investment (from 9.5% to 10.7%) and the decreased allocation in construction and land development (from 6.5% to 5.7%) and Owner-occupied CRE (from 24.3% to 21.2%) was largely the result of changes to allowance allocations in conjunction with changes in past due and loss histories and balance mix changes.

Table 9: Loan Loss Experience

	For the six months ended						Year ended
(in thousands)	June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016			December 31, 2016
Allowance for loan losses (ALLL):
Balance at beginning of period	$	11,820		$	10,307		$	10,307
Provision for loan losses		900			900			1,800
Charge-offs		(176	)		(298	)		(584	)
Recoveries		47			38			297
Net charge-offs		129			260			287
Balance at end of period	$	12,591		$	10,947		$	11,820

Net loan charge-offs (recoveries):
Commercial & industrial	$	110		$	245		$	253
Owner-occupied CRE		(14	)		(2	)		103
Agricultural production		-			-			-
Agricultural real estate		-			-			-
CRE investment		(1	)		(8	)		(221	)
Construction & land development		13			-			-
Residential construction		-			-			-
Residential first mortgage		4			(3	)		49
Residential junior mortgage		(1	)		6			49
Retail & other		18			22			54
Total net loans charged-off	$	129		$	260		$	287

ALLL to total loans		0.63	%		0.70	%		0.75	%
ALLL to net charge-offs		9,760.5	%		4,210.40	%		4,118.5	%
Net charge-offs to average loans, annualized		0.01	%		0.05	%		0.02	%

The allocation of the ALLL is based on Nicolet’s estimate of loss exposure by category of loans and is shown in Table 10 for June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

Table 10: Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses

(in thousands)	June 30, 2017			% of Loan Type to Total Loans			December 31, 2016			% of Loan Type to Total Loans
ALLL allocation
Commercial & industrial	$	4,764			29.3	%	$	3,919			27.3	%
Owner-occupied CRE		2,670			20.8			2,867			23.0
Agricultural production		161			1.8			150			2.2
Agricultural real estate		298			2.5			285			2.9
CRE investment		1,345			15.3			1,124			12.5
Construction & land development		718			4.3			774			4.8
Residential construction		150			1.4			304			1.5
Residential first mortgage		1,786			18.4			1,784			19.1
Residential junior mortgage		498			5.2			461			5.8
Retail & other		201			1.0			152			0.9
Total ALLL	$	12,591			100.0	%	$	11,820			100.0	%
ALLL category as a percent of total ALLL:
Commercial & industrial		37.8	%					33.2	%
Owner-occupied CRE		21.2						24.3
Agricultural production		1.3						1.3
Agricultural real estate		2.4						2.4
CRE investment		10.7						9.5
Construction & land development		5.7						6.5
Residential construction		1.2						2.6
Residential first mortgage		14.2						15.1
Residential junior mortgage		4.0						3.9
Retail & other		1.5						1.2
Total ALLL		100.0	%					100.0	%

Impaired Loans and Nonperforming Assets

As part of its overall credit risk management process, Nicolet’s management has been committed to an aggressive problem loan identification philosophy. This philosophy has been implemented through the ongoing monitoring and review of all pools of risk in the loan portfolio to ensure that problem loans are identified early and the risk of loss is minimized.

Nonperforming loans are considered one indicator of potential future loan losses. Nonperforming loans are defined as nonaccrual loans, including those defined as impaired under current accounting standards, and loans 90 days or more past due but still accruing interest. Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments. Additionally, whenever management becomes aware of facts or circumstances that may adversely impact the collectability of principal or interest on loans, it is management’s practice to place such loans on nonaccrual status immediately. Nonaccrual loans were $16.9 million (consisting of $0.3 million originated loans and $16.6 million acquired loans) at June 30, 2017 compared to $20.3 million at December 31, 2016 (consisting of $0.3 million originated loans and $20.0 million acquired loans). Nonperforming assets (which include nonperforming loans and other real estate owned “OREO”) were $18.8 million at June 30, 2017 compared to $22.3 million at December 31, 2016. OREO was $1.8 million at June 30, 2017, down from $2.1 million at year end 2016, the majority of which is closed bank branch property. Nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets were 0.66% at June 30, 2017 compared to 0.97% at December 31, 2016.

The level of potential problem loans is another predominant factor in determining the relative level of risk in the loan portfolio and in determining the adequacy of the ALLL. Potential problem loans are generally defined by management to include loans rated as Substandard by management but that are in performing status; however, there are circumstances present which might adversely affect the ability of the borrower to comply with present repayment terms. The decision of management to include performing loans in potential problem loans does not necessarily mean that Nicolet expects losses to occur, but that management recognizes a higher degree of risk associated with these loans. The loans that have been reported as potential problem loans are predominantly commercial-based loans covering a diverse range of businesses and real estate property types. Potential problem loans were $14.5 million (0.7% of loans) and $12.6 million (0.8% of loans) at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Potential problem loans require a heightened management review of the pace at which a credit may deteriorate, the duration of asset quality stress, and uncertainty around the magnitude and scope of economic stress that may be felt by Nicolet’s customers and on underlying real estate values.

Table 11: Nonperforming Assets

(in thousands)	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			June 30, 2016
Nonaccrual loans:
Commercial & industrial	$	4,017		$	358		$	1,419
Owner-occupied CRE		3,266			2,894			3,906
AG production		3			9			35
AG real estate		197			208			219
CRE investment		5,744			12,317			14,343
Construction & land development		740			1,193			1,074
Residential construction		80			260			313
Residential first mortgage		2,602			2,990			2,755
Residential junior mortgage		252			56			218
Retail & other		-			—			—
Total nonaccrual loans		16,901			20,285			24,282
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more		—			—			—
Total nonperforming loans	$	16,901		$	20,285		$	24,282
OREO:
Commercial & industrial	$	-		$	64		$	64
CRE investment		-			-			32
Owner-occupied CRE		165			304			874
Construction & land development		90			623			336
Residential real estate owned		-			29			109
Bank property real estate owned		1,594			1,039			1,602
Total OREO		1,849			2,059			3,017
Total nonperforming assets	$	18,750		$	22,344		$	27,299
Total restructured loans accruing	$	—		$	—		$	—
Ratios
Nonperforming loans to total loans		0.84	%		1.29	%		1.56	%
Nonperforming assets to total loans plus OREO		0.93	%		1.42	%		1.75	%
Nonperforming assets to total assets		0.66	%		0.97	%		1.21	%
ALLL to nonperforming loans		74.5	%		58.3	%		45.1	%
ALLL to total loans		0.63	%		0.75	%		0.70	%

Table 12: Investment Securities Portfolio

	June 30, 2017							December 31, 2016
(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		% of Fair Value			Amortized Cost		Fair Value		% of Fair Value
U.S. Government sponsored enterprises	$	26,374	$	26,152		6	%	$	1,981	$	1,963		1	%
State, county and municipals		191,482		191,128		45			191,721		187,243		51
Mortgage-backed securities		166,537		165,671		40			161,309		159,129		44
Corporate debt securities		32,224		32,796		8			12,117		12,169		3
Equity securities		1,287		2,539		1			2,631		4,783		1
Total	$	417,904	$	418,286		100	%	$	369,759	$	365,287		100	%

At June 30, 2017 the total carrying value of investment securities was $418.3 million, up from $365.3 million at December 31, 2016, and represented 14.8% and 15.9% of total assets at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The increase since year end 2016 was largely attributable to investment securities added from First Menasha at acquisition in April 2017. At June 30, 2017, the securities portfolio did not contain securities of any single issuer that were payable from and secured by the same source of revenue or taxing authority where the aggregate carrying value of such securities exceeded 10% of stockholders’ equity.

In addition to securities available for sale, Nicolet has other investments, consisting of capital stock in the Federal Reserve and the FHLB (required as members of the Federal Reserve Bank System and the Federal Home Loan Bank System), and the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation, as well as equity investments in other privately-traded companies. The FHLB and Federal Reserve investments are “restricted” in that they can only be sold back to the respective institutions or another member institution at par, and are thus not liquid, have no ready market or quoted market value, and are carried at cost. The remaining investments have no quoted market prices, and are carried at cost less other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”) charges, if any. Nicolet’s management evaluates all these other investments periodically for impairment, considering financial condition and other available relevant information. Other investments totaled $12.9 million at June 30, 2017 and $17.5 million at December 31, 2016, with the decline primarily attributable to redeemed FHLB stock. One equity investment had an OTTI charge of $0.5 million recorded in the fourth quarter of 2016. There were no OTTI charges recorded in 2017.

Table 13: Investment Securities Portfolio Maturity Distribution

	As of June 30, 2017
	Within One Year						After One but Within Five Years						After Five but Within Ten Years						After Ten Years						Mortgage- related and Equity Securities						Total Amortized Cost					Total Fair Value
	Amount			Yield			Amount			Yield			Amount			Yield			Amount			Yield			Amount			Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount
(in thousands)
U.S. government sponsored enterprises	$	—			—	%	$	10,400			0.1	%	$	15,974			0.1	%	$	—			—	%	$	—			—	%	$	26,374		0.3	%	$	26,152
State and county municipals (1)		13,978			2.5			75,050			2.8			101,440			2.5			1,014			2.9			—			—			191,482		2.6			191,128
Mortgage-backed securities		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			166,537			2.9			166,537		3.0			165,671
Corporate debt securities		—			—			11,092			4.2			14,157			2.9			6,975			5.8			—			—			32,224		3.9			32,796
Equity securities		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			1,287			2.4			1,287		2.4			2,539
Total amortized cost	$	13,978			2.5	%	$	96,542			2.7	%	$	131,571			2.2	%	$	7,989			4.9	%	$	167,824			2.9	%	$	417,904		2.7	%	$	418,286
Total fair value and carrying value	$	13,976					$	96,791					$	130,961					$	8,348					$	168,210										$	418,286
As a percent of total fair value		3	%					23	%					31	%					2	%					41	%										100	%

(1)

The yield on tax-exempt investment securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 35% adjusted for the disallowance of interest expense.

Deposits

Deposits represent Nicolet’s largest source of funds. Nicolet competes with other bank and nonbank institutions for deposits, as well as with a growing number of non-deposit investment alternatives available to depositors, such as mutual funds, money market funds, annuities, and other brokerage investment products. Challenges to deposit growth include price changes on deposit products given movements in the rate environment and other competitive pricing pressures, and customer preferences regarding higher-costing deposit products or non-deposit investment alternatives. Included in total deposits in Table 14 are brokered deposits of $85 million at June 30, 2017 and $21 million at December 31, 2016.

Table 14: Deposits

	June 30, 2017					December 31, 2016
(in thousands)	Amount		% of Total			Amount		% of Total
Demand	$	573,372		24.0	%	$	482,300		24.5	%
Money market and NOW accounts		1,170,986		49.0	%		964,509		49.0	%
Savings		265,165		11.1	%		221,282		11.2	%
Time		380,448		15.9	%		301,895		15.3	%
Total deposits	$	2,389,971		100.0	%	$	1,969,986		100.0	%

Total deposits were $2.4 billion at June 30, 2017, up $420 million or 21% since December 31, 2016, largely attributable to the $375 million deposits added from First Menasha at acquisition in April 2017. On average for the first six months of 2017, total deposits were $2.1 billion, up $717 million, or 53%, from the comparable 2016 period, largely attributable to the inclusion of acquired Baylake deposits for all of 2017 versus two of six months in 2016 and acquired First Menasha deposits for two months of 2017 versus no months in 2016. On average, the mix of deposits changed between the comparable six-month periods, with 2016 carrying more in demand (i.e. noninterest bearing) deposits and less in money market and NOW accounts, savings and time deposits.

Table 15: Average Deposits

	For the six months ended
	June 30, 2017					June 30, 2016
(in thousands)	Amount		% of Total			Amount		% of Total
Demand	$	478,493		23.1	%	$	290,448		21.4	%
Money market and NOW accounts		976,346		47.1	%		644,617		47.6	%
Savings		239,212		11.5	%		168,030		12.4	%
Time		378,701		18.3	%		252,510		18.6	%
Total	$	2,072,752		100.0	%	$	1,355,605		100.0	%

Table 16: Maturity Distribution of Certificates of Deposit of $100,000 or More

(in thousands)	June 30, 2017
3 months or less	$	56,052
Over 3 months through 6 months		18,522
Over 6 months through 12 months		42,061
Over 12 months		80,284

Total	$	196,919

Other Funding Sources

Other funding sources include short-term borrowings (none at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016) and long-term borrowings (totaling $63.1 million at June 30, 2017 and $37.6 million at December 31, 2016). Short-term borrowings, when used, consist mainly of federal funds purchased, overnight borrowings with correspondent financial institutions, FHLB advances with original maturities of one year or less, and customer repurchase agreements maturing in less than six months. Long-term borrowings include notes payable (consisting of FHLB advances with original maturities greater than one year), junior subordinated debentures (largely qualifying as Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes, given their long maturity dates, even though they are redeemable in whole or in part at par), and subordinated debt (issued in 2015 with 10-year maturities, callable on or after the fifth anniversary date of their respective issuance dates, and qualifying as Tier 2 capital for regulatory purposes). Further information regarding these long-term borrowings is included in Note 8 – Notes Payable, Note 9 – Junior Subordinated Debentures, and Note 10 – Subordinated Notes in the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements. Given the high level of deposits to assets, other funding sources are currently utilized modestly, mainly for their capital equivalent characteristics and term funding.

At June 30, 2017, additional funding sources consist of a $10 million available and unused line of credit at the holding company, $143 million of available and unused federal funds purchased lines, and remaining available total borrowing capacity at the FHLB of $193 million.

Off-Balance Sheet Obligations

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, Nicolet had the following commitments that did not appear on its balance sheet:

Table 17: Commitments

	June 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
(in thousands)
Commitments to extend credit — fixed and variable rate	$	622,491	$	554,980
Financial letters of credit		12,988		12,444
Standby letters of credit		5,961		4,898

Liquidity Management

Liquidity management refers to the ability to ensure that cash is available in a timely and cost-effective manner to meet cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers and to meet other commitments as they fall due, including the ability to pay dividends to shareholders, service debt, invest in subsidiaries, repurchase common stock, and satisfy other operating requirements.

Funds are available from a number of basic banking activity sources including but not limited to the core deposit base, the repayment and maturity of loans, investment securities calls, maturities, and sales, and funds obtained through brokered deposits. All investment securities are classified as available for sale and are reported at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet. Approximately $36 million of the $418 million investment securities portfolio at June 30, 2017 was pledged to secure public deposits, short term borrowings, repurchase agreements, or for other purposes as required by law. Other funding sources available include short-term borrowings, federal funds purchased, and long-term borrowings.

Cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were $112 million and $129 million, respectively. These levels have decreased through the first six months of 2017 with $81 million net cash used by investing activities (mostly due to a net increase in loans and securities), partially offset by $15 million net cash provided by operating activities and $48 million net cash provided by financing activities (mostly due to a net increase in deposits). Nicolet’s liquidity resources were sufficient as of June 30, 2017 to fund loans, accommodate deposit trends and cycles, and to meet other cash needs as necessary.

Interest Rate Sensitivity Management

A reasonable balance between interest rate risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and maintenance of yield, is highly important to Nicolet’s business success and profitability. As an ongoing part of its financial strategy and risk management, Nicolet attempts to understand and manage the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on its net interest income. The consolidated balance sheet consists mainly of interest-earning assets (loans, investments and cash) which are primarily funded by interest-bearing liabilities (deposits and other borrowings). Such financial instruments have varying levels of sensitivity to changes in market rates of interest. Market rates are highly sensitive to many factors beyond our control, including but not limited to general economic conditions and policies of governmental and regulatory authorities. Our operating income and net income depends, to a substantial extent, on “rate spread” (i.e., the difference between the income earned on loans, investments and other earning assets and the interest expense paid to obtain deposits and other funding liabilities).

Asset-liability management policies establish guidelines for acceptable limits on the sensitivity to changes in interest rates on earnings and market value of assets and liabilities. Such policies are set and monitored by management and the board of directors’ Asset and Liability Committee.

To understand and manage the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income, Nicolet measures its overall interest rate sensitivity through a net interest income analysis, which calculates the change in net interest income in the event of hypothetical changes in interest rates under different scenarios versus a baseline scenario. Such scenarios can involve static balance sheets, balance sheets with projected growth, parallel (or non-parallel) yield curve slope changes, immediate or gradual changes in market interest rates, and one-year or longer time horizons. The simulation modeling uses assumptions involving market spreads, prepayments of rate-sensitive instruments, renewal rates on maturing or new loans, deposit retention rates, and other assumptions.

Nicolet assessed the impact on net interest income in the event of a gradual +/-100 bps and +/-200 bps decrease in market rates (parallel to the change in prime rate) over a one-year time horizon to a static (flat) balance sheet. The interest rate scenarios are used for analytical purposes only and do not necessarily represent management’s view of future market interest rate movements. Based on this analysis on financial data at June 30, 2017, the projected changes in net interest income over a one-year time horizon, versus the baseline, was -0.2%, 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.4% for the -200, -100, +100 and +200 bps scenarios, respectively; such results are within Nicolet’s guidelines of not greater than -10% for +/- 100 bps and not greater than -15% for +/- 200 bps.

Actual results may differ from these simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes, as well as changes in market conditions and their impact on customer behavior and management strategies.

Capital

Management regularly reviews the adequacy of its capital to ensure that sufficient capital is available for current and future needs and is in compliance with regulatory guidelines and actively reviews capital strategies in light of perceived business risks associated with current and prospective earning levels, liquidity, asset quality, economic conditions in the markets served, and level of returns available to shareholders. Management intends to maintain an optimal capital and leverage mix for growth and for shareholder return.

At June 30, 2017, Nicolet’s capital structure consisted of $352.4 million of common stock equity compared to $275.9 million of common equity at December 31, 2016. Nicolet’s common equity, representing 12.5% of total assets at June 30, 2017 and 12.0% at December 31, 2016, continues to reflect capacity to capitalize on opportunities. Nicolet’s common stock was accepted by shareholders as the primary consideration in the recent 2017 and 2016 acquisitions, as described in Note 2 – “Acquisitions,” in the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

On April 28, 2017 as part of the First Menasha merger, Nicolet issued 1.3 million shares of common stock for common stock consideration of $62.2 million. On April 29, 2016 as part of the Baylake merger, Nicolet issued 4.3 million shares of common stock for common stock consideration of $163.3 million, and recorded $1.2 million consideration for assumed stock options. In connection with the financial advisor business acquisition that completed on April 1, 2016, Nicolet issued $2.6 million in common stock consideration. Book value per common share increased 8% to $35.73 at June 30, 2017 from $33.12 at year end 2016 aided mostly by the common equity issued in the 2017 acquisition and retained earnings exceeding stock purchases.

As shown in Table 18, Nicolet’s regulatory capital ratios remain well above minimum regulatory ratios. At June 30, 2017, Nicolet’s Total, Tier 1, Common Equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) risk-based ratios and its leverage ratio were 12.7%, 11.6%, 10.3% and 10.3%, respectively, compared to the minimum requirements of 8.0%, 6.0%, 4.5% and 4.0%, respectively. Also, at June 30, 2017, the Bank’s Total, Tier 1, CET1 and leverage ratios were 12.0%, 11.4%, 11.4% and 10.1%, respectively, and qualify the Bank as well-capitalized under the prompt-corrective action framework with hurdles of 10.0%, 8.0%, 6.5% and 5.0%, respectively. This strong base of capital has allowed Nicolet to be opportunistic in the current environment and in strategic growth.

The primary source of income and funds for the parent company is dividends from the Bank. Dividends declared by the Bank that exceed the retained net income for the most current year plus retained net income for the preceding two years must be approved by federal regulatory agencies. At June 30, 2017, the Bank could pay dividends of approximately $4.9 million without seeking regulatory approval. During 2016, the Bank paid $35.5 million of dividends (which included a special dividend of $15 million out of Bank surplus) to the parent company, and paid $10 million of dividends during the first half of 2017.

A summary of Nicolet’s and Nicolet National Bank’s regulatory capital amounts and ratios as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are presented in the following table.

Table 18: Capital

	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions (2)
(in thousands)	Amount		Ratio (1)			Amount		Ratio (1)			Amount		Ratio (1)
As of June 30, 2017:
Company
Total capital	$	283,938		12.7	%	$	179,147		8.0	%
Tier 1 capital		259,444		11.6			134,360		6.0
CET 1 capital		230,971		10.3			100,770		4.5
Leverage		259,444		10.3			100,579		4.0

Bank
Total capital	$	269,444		12.0	%	$	179,067		8.0	%	$	223,834		10.0	%
Tier 1 capital		256,853		11.5			134,301		6.0			179,067		8.0
CET 1 capital		256,853		11.5			100,725		4.5			145,492		6.5
Leverage		256,853		10.2			100,769		4.0			125,962		5.0

As of December 31, 2016:
Company
Total capital	$	249,723		13.9	%	$	144,195		8.0	%
Tier 1 capital		226,018		12.5			108,146		6.0
CET 1 capital		202,313		11.2			81,110		4.5
Leverage		226,018		10.3			87,566		4.0

Bank
Total capital	$	217,682		12.1	%	$	144,322		8.0	%	$	180,403		10.0	%
Tier 1 capital		205,862		11.4			108,242		6.0			144,322		8.0
CET 1 capital		205,862		11.4			81,181		4.5			117,262		6.5
Leverage		205,862		9.4			87,329		4.0			109,161		5.0

(1)

The total capital ratio is defined as Tier1 capital plus Tier 2 capital divided by total risk-weighted assets. The Tier 1 capital ratio is defined as Tier1 capital divided by total risk-weighted assets. CET 1 capital ratio is defined as Tier 1 capital, with deductions for goodwill and other intangible assets (other than mortgage servicing assets), net of associated deferred tax liabilities, and limitations on the inclusion of deferred tax assets, mortgage servicing assets and investments in other financial institutions, in each case as provided further in the rules, divided by total risk-weighted assets. The leverage ratio is defined as Tier 1 capital divided by the most recent quarter’s average total assets, adjusted in accordance with regulatory guidelines.

(2)

Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable at the bank holding company level.

In July 2013, the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC issued final rules implementing the Basel III regulatory capital framework and related Dodd-Frank Act changes. The final rules took effect for the Company and Bank on January 1, 2015, subject to a transition period for certain parts of the rules. The rules permitted certain banking organizations to retain, through a one-time election, the existing treatment for accumulated other comprehensive income. Nicolet and the Bank made the election in 2015 to retain the existing treatment for accumulated other comprehensive income.

The tables above calculate and present regulatory capital based upon the new regulatory capital ratio requirements under Basel III that became effective on January 1, 2015. Beginning in 2016, an additional capital conservation buffer was added to the minimum requirements for capital adequacy purposes, subject to a three year phase-in period. The capital conservation buffer will be fully phased-in on January 1, 2019 at 2.5 percent. A banking organization with a conservation buffer of less than 2.5 percent (or the required phase-in amount in years prior to 2019) will be subject to limitations on capital distributions, including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers. At the present time, the ratios for the Company and Bank are sufficient to meet the fully phased-in conservation buffer.

Future Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued updated guidance to Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-09 Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718). ASU 2017-09 applies to entities that change the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award to provide clarity and reduce diversity in practice as well as cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718 to the modification to the terms and conditions of a share-based payment award. The updated guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

See section “Interest Rate Sensitivity Management,” of Management’s Discussion and Analysis under Part I, Item 2.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period covered by this report, management, under the supervision and with the participation of our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon, and as of the date of such evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls or, to the Company’s knowledge, in other factors during the quarter covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We and our subsidiaries may be involved from time to time in various routine legal proceedings incidental to our respective businesses. Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries are currently engaged in any legal proceedings that are expected to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Following are Nicolet’s monthly common stock purchases during the second quarter of 2017.

	Total Number of Shares Purchased (a)		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(a)
	(#)		($)		(#)		(#)
Period
April 1 – April 30, 2017		2,914	$	47.75		—		531,000
May 1– May 31, 2017		27,924	$	48.95		26,986		504,000
June 1 – June 30, 2017		46,643	$	50.53		46,643		458,000
Total		77,481	$	49.86		73,629		458,000

(a)

During April and May 2017, the Company repurchased 2,914 and 938 shares for minimum tax withholding settlements on restricted stock and net settlements of stock options, respectively. These purchases do not count against the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the board of directors’ authorization.

(b)

During early 2014, a common stock repurchase program was approved which authorized, with subsequent modifications the use of up to $30 million to repurchase up to 1,050,000 shares of outstanding common stock. At June 30, 2017, approximately $12.2 million remained available to repurchase up to 458,000 common shares. Using the closing stock price on June 30, 2017 of $54.71, a total of approximately 222,000 shares of common stock could be repurchased under this plan. Nicolet resumed repurchases of its shares under this program during the second quarter of 2017.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are filed herewith:

Exhibit
Number		Description
31.1		Certification of CEO under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2		Certification of CFO under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1		Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2		Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101*		Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (v) Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as blocks of text.

*Indicates information that is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC.

August 4, 2017	/s/ Robert B. Atwell
	Robert B. Atwell
	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

August 4, 2017	/s/ Ann K. Lawson
	Ann K. Lawson
	Chief Financial Officer

NICOLET BANKSHARES INC - FORM 10-Q - August 4, 2017

Attached files

NICOLET BANKSHARES INC Reports