Attached files

file filename
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - FUSE GROUP HOLDING INC.ex32-2.htm
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - FUSE GROUP HOLDING INC.ex32-1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - FUSE GROUP HOLDING INC.ex31-2.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - FUSE GROUP HOLDING INC.ex31-1.htm


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 


FORM 10-Q
 

 
   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017
 
   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from ____ to ____
 
Commission file number: 333-202948
 
FUSE ENTERPRISES INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Nevada
 
47-1017473
(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer 
Identification No.)
 
444 E. Huntington Dr., Suite 105
Arcadia, CA 91006
(Address of principal executive offices including zip code)
 
(626) 210-0000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  No
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes  No
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” accelerated filer” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
 
Large accelerated filer
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
 
 
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  No
 
Class
 
Outstanding at August 3, 2017
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share
 
45,150,000*

* The registrant completed a 5-for-1 forward stock split on May 26, 2017.


TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
1
Item 1.
1
Item 2.
14
Item 3.
17
Item 4.
17
 
 
 
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
18
Item 1.
18
Item 1A.
18
Item 2.
18
Item 3.
18
Item 4.
18
Item 5.
18
Item 6.
19
20
  
 
 

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.
Financial Statements
 
FUSE ENTERPRISES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2017 (UNAUDITED) AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2016
 
   
JUNE 30, 2017
   
SEPTEMBER 30, 2016
 
             
 ASSETS
           
             
 CURRENT ASSETS
           
Cash and equivalents
 
$
894,448
   
$
8,165
 
Prepaid expenses
   
1,006,221
     
8,532
 
Notes receivable
   
3,925,000
     
-
 
                 
Total current assets
   
5,825,669
     
16,697
 
                 
 NON-CURRENT ASSETS
               
Property and equipment, net
   
13,503
     
2,258
 
                 
Total non-current assets
   
13,503
     
2,258
 
                 
 TOTAL ASSETS
 
$
5,839,172
   
$
18,955
 
                 
 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
               
                 
 CURRENT LIABILITIES
               
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
 
$
-
   
$
7,742
 
Accounts payable - related parties
   
-
     
27,405
 
Other payables
   
5,306
     
-
 
Note payable
   
6,869,818
     
-
 
                 
Total current liabilities
   
6,875,124
     
35,147
 
                 
 CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS
               
                 
 STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
               
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 375,000,000 shares
authorized; 45,150,000 shares issued and outstanding
as of June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016
   
45,150
     
45,150
 
Additional paid in capital (deficit)
   
47,432
     
(4,350
)
Accumulated deficit
   
(1,128,534
)
   
(56,992
)
                 
Total stockholders' deficit
   
(1,035,952
)
   
(16,192
)
                 
 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND DEFICIT
 
$
5,839,172
   
$
18,955
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
 

FUSE ENTERPRISES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED) 
 
   
NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
   
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30
 
   
2017
   
2016
   
2017
   
2016
 
                         
 Revenue
 
$
-
   
$
17,925
   
$
-
   
$
3,600
 
                                 
 Cost of revenue
   
-
     
5,526
     
-
     
1,500
 
                                 
 Gross profit
   
-
     
12,399
     
-
     
2,100
 
                                 
 Operating expenses
                               
      General and administrative
   
1,036,216
     
42,743
     
514,096
     
24,311
 
                                 
      Total operating expenses
   
1,036,216
     
42,743
     
514,096
     
24,311
 
                                 
 Loss from operations
   
(1,036,216
)
   
(30,344
)
   
(514,096
)
   
(22,211
)
                                 
 Non-operating expenses
                               
      Interest income
   
55,533
     
-
     
37,387
     
-
 
      Interest expense
   
(109,917
)
   
-
     
(52,096
)
   
-
 
      Consulting income
   
20,000
     
-
     
13,333
     
-
 
      Financial expense
   
(1,112
)
   
-
     
(649
)
   
-
 
      Other income, net
   
170
     
-
     
170
     
-
 
                                 
      Total non-operating loss, net
   
(35,326
)
   
-
     
(1,855
)
   
-
 
                                 
 Loss before income tax
   
(1,071,542
)
   
(30,344
)
   
(515,951
)
   
(22,211
)
 Income tax provision
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
 
                                 
 Net loss
 
$
(1,071,542
)
 
$
(30,344
)
 
$
(515,951
)
 
$
(22,211
)
                                 
 Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding
   
45,150,000
     
31,737,775
     
45,150,000
     
40,259,890
 
                                 
 Basic and diluted net loss per share
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(0
)
 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
(0
)

 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
  

FUSE ENTERPRISES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
 
   
NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
 
   
2017
   
2016
 
             
 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
           
             Net loss
 
$
(1,071,542
)
 
$
(30,344
)
             Adjustments to reconcile loss including noncontrolling
                  interest to net cash used in operating activities:
               
                          Depreciation
   
1,284
     
947
 
                          Amortization
   
327,311
     
-
 
                          Capital contribution from officer's salary
   
16,667
     
-
 
                          Changes in assets and liabilities:
               
                                    Prepaid expenses
   
(1,325,000
)
   
-
 
                                    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
   
-
     
(1,004
)
                                    Accounts payable - related party
   
-
     
9,405
 
                                    Other payables
   
5,306
     
-
 
                 
             Net cash used in operating activities
   
(2,045,974
)
   
(20,996
)
                 
 CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
               
                                    Notes receivable
   
(3,925,000
)
   
-
 
                                    Acquisition of fixed assets
   
(14,598
)
   
-
 
                 
             Net cash used in investing activities
   
(3,939,598
)
   
-
 
                 
 CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
               
                                    Increase in paid in capital
   
2,037
     
35,300
 
                                    Proceeds from note
   
6,869,818
     
-
 
                 
             Net cash provided by financing activities
   
6,871,855
     
35,300
 
                 
 NET INCREASE IN CASH AND EQUIVALENTS
   
886,283
     
14,304
 
                 
 CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
   
8,165
     
13,581
 
                 
 CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
 
$
894,448
   
$
27,885
 
                 
 Supplemental cash flow data:
               
    Income tax paid
 
$
-
   
$
-
 
    Interest paid
 
$
109,917
   
$
-
 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


FUSE ENTERPRISES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2017 (UNAUDITED) AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2016

Note 1 – Organization and Operations

Fuse Enterprises Inc. (the “Company” or “Enterprises”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on December 24, 2013.  Fuse Enterprises Inc. is a full service online marketing agency. On December 6, 2016, the Company incorporated Fuse Processing, Inc. (“Processing”) in the State of California. Processing seeks opportunities in the mining business and is currently investigating potential mining targets in Asia and North America.  The Company is the sole shareholder of Processing.  On November 28, 2016, 5,500,000 shares of the common stock of Enterprises, or 60.91% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock, were sold by Pavel Mikhalkov and Aleksandr Kriukov in a series of private transactions to a new shareholder for $55,000 (collectively, the “Stock Sales”). In connection with the Stock Sales, Messrs. Mikhalkov and Kriukov released the Company from certain liabilities and obligations arising out of their service as directors and officers of the Company. In March 2017, Processing acquired 100% ownership of Fuse Trading Limited (“Trading”) for HKD1 (US$0.13). Trading had no operations prior to the acquisition by Processing, and Trading expects to be engaged in mining-related businesses. On May 26, 2017, the Company filed a Certificate of Change with the State of Nevada to (i) increase its authorized shares of common stock from 75,000,000 to 375,000,000 and (ii) effect a corresponding 5-for-1 forward stock split of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Stock Split”).  The consolidated financial statements were retroactively stated to reflect the Stock Split for the periods presented.

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements (“CFS”) were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The CFS include the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiary. All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The interim CFS as of June 30, 2017, and for the nine-month and three-month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were prepared without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures, which are normally included in CFS prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP were not included. The interim consolidated financial information should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, previously filed with the SEC.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include all significant normal and recurring adjustments) necessary to present a fair statement of the Company’s interim consolidated financial position as of June 30, 2017, its interim consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the nine and three month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, as applicable, have been made. The interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full fiscal year or any future periods.

Development Stage Company

Enterprises is a development stage company as defined by section 915-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC").  Although the Company has recognized nominal amounts of revenue, it is still devoting substantially all of its efforts on establishing the business.  All losses accumulated since its inception on December 24, 2013 were considered part of the Company's development stage activities.

In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation.

The amendments in this Update remove the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the Accounting Standards Codification, thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage.


For public business entities, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Fuse Enterprises adopted ASU No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements. The adoption of this ASU allows the Company to remove the inception to date information and all references to the development stage.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).

Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:

(i)
Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
 
 
(ii)
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.

These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB ASC for disclosures about fair value (“FV”) of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB ASC ("Paragraph 820-10-35-37") to measure the FV of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring FV in U.S. GAAP, and expands disclosures about FV measurements. 

To increase consistency and comparability in FV measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a FV hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure FV into three (3) broad levels.  The FV hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  The three levels of FV hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

Level
 
1 Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
 
Level
 
2 Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
 
Level
 
3 Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their FVs are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.


The FV hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the FV measurement of the instrument.
 
The carrying amount of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their FV because of the short maturity of those instruments. 

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm’s-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable

The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses on accounts receivable. Management reviews the composition of accounts receivable and analyzes historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment patterns to evaluate the adequacy of these reserves.  The Company had no accounts receivable or bad debt allowances at June 30, 2017.

Plant, Property and Equipment

Plant, property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, if any. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred; while additions, renewals and improvements are capitalized. When property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation is removed from the respective accounts, and any gain or loss is included in operations. Depreciation of property and equipment is provided using the straight-line method for substantially all assets and estimated lives as follows:

Building and workshops
20 years
Computer and office equipment
5 years
Office furniture
7 years 
Decoration and renovation
10 years
Production machinery
10 years
Autos
5 years

Depreciation of plant, property and equipment attributable to manufacturing activities is capitalized as part of inventories, and expensed to cost of goods sold when inventories are sold.

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB ASC for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions. Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include: a. affiliates of the Company; b. entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the FV option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of financial statements is not required in those statements.


The disclosures shall include:  a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB ASC to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur.  The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment.

In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein. 

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements.  If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.  Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.

Revenue Recognition

The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB ASC for revenue recognition.  The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned.  The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

The Company derives its revenues from sales contracts with its customer with revenues being generated upon rendering of services.  Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via invoice; service is considered provided when the service is delivered to the customers; and the sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of the purchase order and there is no separate sales rebate, discount, or volume incentive.

Income Tax Provision

The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB ASC, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. 

Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.


Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company follows paragraph 740-10-25 of the FASB ASC. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements.  Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.  The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.  The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. Interest associated with unrecognized tax benefits are classified as interest expense and penalties are classified in selling, general and administrative expenses in the statements of income.

The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no unrecognized tax liabilities or benefits in accordance with the provisions of Section 740-10-25 at June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016.  The tax years 2014-2016 remain open to examination for federal income tax purposes and by the other major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject.

Earnings (Loss) per Share

Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed similar to basic EPS except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if all the potential common shares, warrants and stock options had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. Diluted EPS is based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options and warrants were converted or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method for the outstanding options and warrants, and the if-converted method for the outstanding convertible instruments. Under the treasury stock method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later) and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. Under the if-converted method, outstanding convertible instruments are assumed to be converted into common stock at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later).

Cash Flows Reporting

The Company follows paragraph  230-10-45-24 of the FASB ASC for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB ASC to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments.  The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB ASC.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments. To simplify the accounting for adjustments made to provisional amounts recognized in a business combination, the amendments eliminate the requirement to retrospectively account for those adjustments. For public business entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments should be applied prospectively to adjustments to provisional amounts that occur after the effective date with earlier application permitted for financial statements that have not been issued. The Company does not anticipate that this adoption will have a significant impact on its CFS.


On March 30, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which includes amendments to accounting for income taxes at settlement, forfeitures, and net settlements to cover withholding taxes. The amendments in ASU 2016-09 are effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted but requires all elements of the amendments to be adopted at once rather than individually. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU No. 2016-09 will have on the Company’s CFS.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326), which requires entities to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. This replaces the existing incurred loss model and is applicable to the measurement of credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early application will be permitted for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the standard will have on its CFS.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. ASU 2016-15 clarifies the presentation and classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of ASU 2016-15 on its CFS.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16—Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. This ASU improves the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. For public business entities, the amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this ASU will have a significant impact on its CFS.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-17 Consolidation (Topic 810): Interests Held through Related Parties That Are under Common Control. This update amends the consolidation guidance on how a reporting entity that is the single decision maker of a variable interest entity (VIE) should treat indirect interests in the entity held through related parties that are under common control with the reporting entity when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of that VIE. This ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this ASU will have a significant impact on its CFS.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. The guidance requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim period within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The standard should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this ASU will have a significant impact on its CFS.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The standard should be applied prospectively on or after the effective date. The Company will evaluate the impact of adopting this standard prospectively upon any transactions of acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The guidance removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. The guidance should be adopted on a prospective basis for the annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its CFS.


Note 3 – Going Concern

The accompanying CFS have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
 
As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $1,128,534 at June 30, 2017, working capital deficit of $1,049,455 and net loss of $1,071,542 for the nine months ended June 30, 2017, which raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
 
Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a private or public offering, or obtaining loans from banks or others.  While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to commence operations and generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds on reasonable terms and conditions, there can be no assurances to that effect.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 4 – Property and Equipment

Property and equipment at June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 consisted of the following:

 
 
Estimated
Useful Lives
(Years)
   
2017
   
2016
 
 
                 
Computer equipment
 
5
   
$
1,852
   
$
3,089
 
       Less accumulated depreciation
         
(185
)
   
(1,556
)
  Computer equipment, net
         
1,667
     
1,533
 
 
                     
Office furniture
 
7
     
12,746
     
1,289
 
         Less accumulated depreciation
         
(910
)
   
(564
)
  Office furniture, net
         
11,836
     
725
 
Total property and equipment, net
       
$
13,503
   
$
2,258
 

Depreciation expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $1,284 and $947, respectively.  Depreciation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $548 and $316, respectively.

Note 5 – Related Party Transactions

Consulting services from President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

Consulting services provided by the President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:

 
 
June 30, 2017
   
June 30, 2016
 
 
           
President, Chief Executive Officer
 
$
-
   
$
4,500
 
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
   
-
     
4,500
 
 
 
$
-
   
$
9,000
 

Accounts Payable – Related Parties

As of June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016, the Company owed its directors and officers $0 and $27,405 respectively.


Note 6 – Deposit and prepaid expenses

As of June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016, the Company had deposit and prepaid expenses of $1,006,221 and $8,532, respectively.  On January 4, 2017, Processing entered into a Consulting and Strategist Agreement with a consulting company for a six-month service term.  On July 3, 2017, the Company and the consulting company agreed to extend the Consulting and Strategist Agreement until January 3, 2018 at no additional cost. The consultant will provide Processing market research findings, exploration and advise on business development opportunities in certain countries, and other general business advisory services. Processing paid a deposit of $1,325,000 for the consulting fee. If Processing does not make any investment or enter into a business relationship with a target located in Mexico by the end of the service term, the consultant will refund Processing $1,000,000 of the consulting fee. During the nine and three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company expensed $319,613 and $163,398 prepaid consulting expense, respectively, which was amortized over six months per the terms of the original agreement.
 
Note 7 – Notes receivable and interest receivable

As of June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016, the Company had notes receivable of $3,925,000 and $0, respectively.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2017, the Company entered a series of promissory note agreements with third-party companies for $3,925,000.  These notes have a term of 12 months with interest of 5%, payable at the end of each March, June, September and December following the issue date.  For the nine and three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company had interest income of $55,533 and $37,387, respectively. As of June 30, 2017, the Company had interest receivable of $0.
 
The following table sets forth information as to each borrower that accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s loan receivable at June 30, 2017.
 

 
 
2017
 
 
     
Borrower A
   
1,925,000
 
Borrower B
   
1,000,000
 
Borrower C
   
1,000,000
 
    $
3,925,000
 

Note 8 – Other payables

As of June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016, the Company had other payables of $5,306 and $0, respectively. As of June 30, 2017, other payables consisted of salary and payroll tax payables.

Note 9 – Note payable

On December 19, 2016, the Company entered into a Convertible Promissory Note Purchase Agreement (the “Original Agreement”) with one of its major shareholders (“Purchaser”). Under the Agreement, the Company sold a Convertible Promissory Note to the lender of $6,869,818 and interest of 6% (the “Original Note”). The Original Note was to mature on the date that is 24 months from the original issue date, and any outstanding principal and interest on the Original Note could be converted at any time prior to maturity at the lender’s option at a conversion price of $1.50 per share of the Company’s common stock.  There was no beneficial conversion feature for the Original Note due to the conversion price being higher than the stock price at the time of the issuance of the Original Note.

On March 20, 2017, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Promissory Note Purchase Agreement with the major shareholder and Trading (the “Amended Agreement”).  The Amended Agreement amends and restates the Original Agreement.  Under the terms of the Amended Agreement, the existing Original Note issued under the Original Agreement was cancelled and Trading issued a Promissory Note to the Purchaser of $6,869,818, with a term of 12 months, renewable for up to an additional 12 months at the Purchaser’s option, and at an interest rate of 3% (the “New Note”).  The Purchaser does not have conversion option under the New Note. The principal amount of the New Note and any unpaid interest accrued thereon may become due and payable immediately upon the occurrence of certain events of default, including but not limited to Trading’s insolvency or the institution of bankruptcy proceedings against Trading.

As of June 30, 2017, the Company had an outstanding balance of $6,869,818 on the New Note.  During the nine and three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company incurred interest expense of $109,917 and $52,096, respectively, and had interest payable of $0 as of June 30, 2017.
 

 
Note 10 – Stockholders’ Equity

Shares Authorized

Upon formation, the total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company was authorized to issue was 75,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share. On May 26, 2017, the Company filed a Certificate of Change with the State of Nevada to (i) increase its authorized shares of common stock from 75,000,000 to 375,000,000 and (ii) effect a corresponding 5-for-1 forward stock split of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Stock Split”).  The CFS were retroactively stated to reflect the Stock Split for the periods presented.
 
Common Stock

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, the Company sold 3,530,000 common shares (prior to 5-for-1 stock split) at $0.01 per share for aggregate proceeds of $35,300.

Paid in Capital
 
During the nine months ended June 30, 2017, a former shareholder paid certain expenses and liabilities for the Company of $35,115, and a former CEO (Mr. Yong Zhang) contributed his salary of $16,667 earned during his service term to the Company, which were both recorded as an increase of paid in capital.

Note 11 – Income Tax

Deferred Tax Assets

At June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016, the Company had net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes of $1,007,640 and $56,992, respectively, which may be offset against future taxable income through 2034.  No tax benefit has been reported with respect to these net operating loss carry-forwards in the accompanying financial statements because the Company believes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets of approximately $222,578 as of June 30, 2017, was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are fully offset by a full valuation allowance.

Components of deferred tax assets are as follows:

 
 
June 30,
2017
   
September 30,
2016
 
Net deferred tax assets – Non-current:
           
Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards
 
$
222,578
   
$
8,549
 
Less valuation allowance
   
(222,578
)
   
(8,549
)
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
 
$
-
   
$
-
 

Income Tax Provision in the Statements of Operations
 
A reconciliation of the consolidated federal statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate as a percentage of income before income taxes for the nine and three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:

 
 
June 30, 2017
   
June 30, 2016
 
 
           
Federal statutory income tax expense (benefit) rate
   
(34.00
)%
   
(34.00
)%
Federal income tax rate difference
   
19.00
%
   
19.00
%
State statutory income tax (benefit) rate, net of effect of state income tax deductible to federal income tax
   
(7.51
)%
   
-
%
Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards
   
22.51
%
   
15.00
%
Effective income tax rate
   
0.00
%
   
0.00
%

 


Note 12 – Commitments

Effective on January 1, 2017, Processing, as a sublessee, entered into a sublease rental agreement for office space with a sublessor for a term of two years. The monthly rent is $1,897. The Company recorded rental expense of $11,380 and $0 for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company recorded rental expense of $5,689 and $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  The future annual minimum lease payment from June 30, 2017 is $22,764 for 2017 and $11,382 for 2018.

On April 1, 2017, the Company entered a strategist consulting agreement with a consulting company for a service term of one year. The compensation to the consulting company will be $50,000 per year, payable monthly at the end of each month.

Note 13 – Concentrations

Customers:
The following table sets forth information as to each customer that accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s revenue for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

 
 
2017
   
2016
 
 
           
Company A
   
-
%
   
16.7
%
Company B
   
-
%
   
45.1
%
Company C
   
-
%
   
18.1
%
Company D
           
20.1
%
 
   
-
%
   
100.00
%

Note 14 – Subsequent Events

The Company follows the guidance in FASB ASC 855-10 for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued and determined that the Company did not have any material subsequent events to disclose in its CFS other than the events discussed above.

Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
 
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.
 
DISCLAIMER REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The following discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes in Item I above and with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes, and with the information under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results could differ materially from the results described in or implied by these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed in this report and those discussed in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

Fuse Enterprises Inc. (the “Company” or “Enterprises” or “We”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on December 24, 2013.  Enterprises Inc. is a full service online marketing agency. On December 6, 2016, the Company incorporated Fuse Processing, Inc. (“Processing”) in the State of California. Processing seeks business opportunities in the mining business and is currently investigating potential mining targets in Asia and North America.  Enterprises is the sole shareholder of Processing.  On November 28, 2016, 5,500,000 shares of the common stock of Enterprises, or 60.91% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock, were sold by Pavel Mikhalkov and Aleksandr Kriukov in a series of private transactions to a new shareholder for an aggregate purchase price of $55,000 (collectively, the “Stock Sales”). In connection with the Stock Sales, Messrs. Mikhalkov and Kriukov released the Company from certain liabilities and obligations arising out of their service as directors and officers of the Company. In March 2017, Processing acquired 100% ownership of Fuse Trading Limited (“Trading”) for HKD1 (US$0.13). Trading had no operations prior to the acquisition by Processing, and Trading expects to be engaged in mining-related businesses.

Results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

Revenue

We generate revenue from sales of our marketing and web development services directly to small and medium-sized business. We acquire customers through direct telemarketing and referrals. We are currently seeking business opportunities in the mining industry and is investigating potential mining targets in Asia and North America.
 
Our gross revenue from consulting services related to website development, SEO consulting and online marketing for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $0 and $3,600, respectively. Our cost of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $0 and $1,500, respectively, resulting in a gross profit of $0 and $2,100 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  The Company did not generate any revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2017 due to the fact the Company did not receive any new orders for our consulting and website development services and the Company is also in the process of transforming its business by seeking new business opportunities.

Costs and Expenses

The major components of our expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 are outlined in the table below:

 
 
2017
   
2016
   
Increase
(Decrease)
 
 
                 
General and administrative
 
$
541,096
   
$
24,311
   
$
489,785
 
 
 
$
541,096
   
$
24,311
   
$
489,785
 

The increase in our operating costs for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016, includes increased salary expenses of $67,833, increased travel expenses of $100,809, increased legal fees of $33,820 and increased consulting fees of $215,077, as a result of the Company recruiting experienced personnel, advisors and consultants, and becoming more aggressive in seeking business opportunities for its development and expansion.  In addition to the online marketing and consulting business, the Company is actively seeking opportunities in the mining industries in Asia and North America.

Non-operating expenses

Non-operating expenses were $1,855 for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $0 for the same period in 2016.  The increase in non-operating expenses was mainly due to increased interest expense of $52,096 and financial expense of $649, which was partially offset by increased interest income of $37,387, net other income of 170 and consulting income of $13,333.

Results of operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

Revenue

We generate revenue from sales of our marketing and web development services directly to small and medium-sized business. We have historically acquired customers through direct telemarketing and referrals. We are currently seeking business opportunities in the mining industry and are investigating potential mining targets in Asia and North America.

Our gross revenue from consulting services related to website development, SEO consulting and online marketing for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $0 and $17,925, respectively. Our cost of revenues for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $0 and $5,526, respectively, resulting in a gross profit of $0 and $12,399 for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  The Company did not generate any revenue during the nine months ended June 30, 2017 due to the fact the Company did not receive any new orders for our consulting and website development services and the Company is also in the process of transforming its business by seeking new business opportunities.

Costs and Expenses

The major components of our expenses for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 are outlined in the table below:

 
 
2017
   
2016
   
Increase
(Decrease)
 
 
                 
General and administrative
 
$
1,036,216
   
$
42,743
   
$
993,473
 
 
 
$
1,036,216
   
$
42,743
   
$
993,473
 

The increase in our operating costs for the nine months ended June 30, 2017, compared to nine months ended June 30, 2016, was due to increased salary expenses of $128,667, increased travel expenses of $209,189, increased legal fees of $64,322 and increased consulting fees of $418,684, as a result of the Company recruiting experienced personnel, advisors and consultants, and becoming more aggressive in seeking new business opportunities for its development and expansion. 

Non-operating expenses

Non-operating expenses were $35,326 for the nine months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $0 for the same period in 2016.  The increase in non-operating expenses was mainly due to increased interest expense of $109,917 and financial expense of $1,112, which was partially offset by increased interest income of $55,533, net other income of $170 and consulting income of $20,000, which is from the consulting service Fuse Processing provided to a Hong Kong company seeking to invest in certain projects in the United States.

Accounts Payable – Related Parties

As of June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016, the Company owed its directors and officers $0 and $27,405 respectively.


Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
The table below provides selected working capital information for the periods indicated:

 
 
 
As of
   
As of
 
 
 
June 30,
   
September 30,
 
 
 
2017
   
2016
 
 
           
Total current assets
 
$
5,825,669
   
$
16,697
 
Total current liabilities
   
(6,875,124
)
   
(35,147
)
Working capital deficiency
 
$
(1,049,455
)
 
$
(18,450
)

Liquidity

During the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company reported net loss of $1,071,542 and $30,344 respectively.  During the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company reported net loss of $515,951 and $22,211, respectively.

If we are not successful in expanding our clientele base and establishing profitability and positive cash flow, additional capital may be required to maintain ongoing operations. We have explored and are continuing to explore options to provide additional financing to fund future operations as well as other possible courses of action. Such actions may include, but are not limited to, securing lines of credit, sales of debt or equity securities (which may result in dilution to existing shareholders), loans and cash advances from other third parties or banks, and other similar actions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional funding (if needed), on acceptable terms or at all, through a sale of our common stock, loans from financial institutions, or other third parties, or any of the actions discussed above. If we cannot sustain profitable operations, and additional capital is unavailable, lack of liquidity could have a material adverse effect on our business viability, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Cash Flows

The table below, for the period indicated, provides selected cash flow information:

 
 
For the Nine Months
Ended
June 30, 2017
   
For the Nine Months
Ended
June 30, 2016
 
 
           
Net cash used in operating activities
 
$
(2,045,974
)
 
$
(20,996
)
Net cash used in investing activities
   
(3,939,598
)
   
-
 
Net cash provided by financing activities
   
6,871,855
     
35,300
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash
 
$
886,283
   
$
14,304
 

We have generated revenues of $0 and $17,925 during the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Our cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $2,045,974 and $20,996, respectively.   The increase in net cash used in operating activities was mainly due to increased net loss of $1,071,542 and increased cash outflow for prepaid consulting expenses of $1,325,000, which was partially offset by a capital contribution from an officer’s salary of $16,667.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Our cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $3,939,598 and $0, respectively. The increase in net cash used in investing activities was mainly due to cash outflow for a series of notes receivable of $3,925,000 and cash outflow for acquisition of fixed assets of $14,598.  

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

During the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, we received proceeds of $2,038 and $35,300, respectively, through the payment for certain payables made by our management as capital contributions, and $6,869,818 and $0, respectively, from issuing a note to one of our major shareholders.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements 

See Note 2 to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2017, we did not have any off-balance-sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
 
Not applicable.

Item 4.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded as of the end of the period covered by this report that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to a material weakness. The material weakness relates to our having one employee assigned to positions that involve processing financial information, resulting in a lack of segregation of duties so that all journal entries and account reconciliations are reviewed by someone other than the preparer, heightening the risk of error or fraud. If we are unable to remediate the material weakness, or other control deficiencies are identified, we may not be able to report our financial results accurately, prevent fraud or file our periodic reports as a public company in a timely manner. Due to our small size and the early stage of our business, segregation of duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. We have limited capital resources and have given priority in the use of those resources to our business development efforts. As a result, we have not been able to take steps to improve our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2017. However, we continue to evaluate the effectiveness of internal controls and procedures on an on-going basis. As our operations grow and become more complex, we intend to hire additional personnel in financial reporting and other areas. However, there can be no assurance of when, if ever, we will be able to remediate the identified material weaknesses.
 
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
  

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
 
We may from time to time be party to litigation and subject to claims incident to the ordinary course of business. As we grow and gain prominence in the marketplace we may become party to an increasing number of litigation matters and claims. The outcome of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, and the resolution of these matters could materially affect our future results of operations, cash flows or financial position. We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings.
   
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
 
Not applicable.
 
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
 
On December 19, 2016, the Company entered into a Convertible Promissory Note Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Landbond Home Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of Samoa (the “Purchaser”). Under the Agreement, the Company sold a Convertible Promissory Note to the Purchaser with a principal amount of $6,869,818 and 6% interest (the “Note”). The Note was to mature on the date that was 24 months from the original issue date, and any outstanding principal and interest on the Note could be converted at any time prior to maturity at the lender’s option at a conversion price of $1.50 per share of the Company’s common stock.  The Agreement was executed pursuant to an exemption from registration under Regulation S.  The purchaser of the Note held 60.9% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, and the execution of the Amended Agreement and New Note (as defined below) constitutes a related-party transaction under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K.

On March 20, 2017, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Promissory Note Purchase Agreement (the “Amended Agreement”) with the Purchaser and Fuse Trading Limited, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company organized under the laws of Hong Kong (“Trading”).  Under the terms of the Amended Agreement, the existing Note issued under the Agreement was cancelled and Trading issued a Promissory Note (the “New Note”) to the Purchaser in the principal amount of the Note, $6,869,818, with a term of 12 months, renewable for up to an additional 12 months at the Purchaser’s option, and interest of 3%.  The Purchaser does not have conversion rights under the New Note issued by Trading.  The principal amount of the New Note and any unpaid interest accrued thereon may become due and payable immediately upon the occurrence of certain events of default, including but not limited to Trading’s insolvency or the institution of bankruptcy proceedings against Trading. The Company intends to use the proceeds from the sale of the New Note for operating expenses and the expansion of its business.
 
Item 3.
Defaults upon Senior Securities
 
None.
 
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosure
 
Not applicable.
 
Item 5.
Other Information
 
None.
 

Item 6.
Exhibits
 
Exhibit No.
 
Description
31.1
 
31.2
 
32.1
 
32.2
 
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document*
101.SCH
 
XBRL Schema Document*
101.CAL
 
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document*
101.DEF
 
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document*
101.LAB
 
XBRL Label Linkbase Document*
101.PRE
 
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document*
 
*
filed herewith
 




SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
FUSE ENTERPRISES INC.
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Umesh Patel
 
 
Umesh Patel
 
 
Chief Executive Officer
 
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
August 4, 2017
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Choon Kang Roy Tan
 
 
Choon Kang Roy Tan
 
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
 
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
August 4, 2017
 
 
 
20