Attached files
| file | filename |
|---|---|
| EX-5.1 - EXHIBIT 5.1 - Armour Residential REIT, Inc. | arr8-k52617atmexhibit51.htm |
| EX-1.1 - EXHIBIT 1.1 - Armour Residential REIT, Inc. | arr8-k52617atmexhibit11.htm |
| 8-K - 8-K - Armour Residential REIT, Inc. | arrform8-k52617atm.htm |
Exhibit 8.1
 | SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 787 SEVENTH AVENUE NEW YORK, NY 10019 +1 212 839 5300 +1 212 839 5599 FAX | BEIJING BOSTON BRUSSELS CENTURY CITY CHICAGO DALLAS GENEVA | HONG KONG HOUSTON LONDON LOS ANGELES MUNICH NEW YORK PALO ALTO | SAN FRANCISCO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE SYDNEY TOKYO WASHINGTON, D.C. |
FOUNDED 1866 | ||||
May 26, 2017
ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc.
3001 Ocean Drive, Suite 201
Vero Beach, Florida 32963
Ladies and Gentlemen:
This opinion is being furnished to you in connection with that ATM Equity OfferingSM Sales Agreement (“Sales Agreement”), dated May 26, 2017, among ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), ARMOUR Capital Management, LP, a Delaware limited partnership and the external manager of the company (the “Manager”), and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, in connection with certain United States federal income tax matters in regard to the Company’s issuance and sale of up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and related rules and regulations (the “1933 Act”), described in the prospectus, dated May 1, 2015, which forms a part of the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-3 (the “Base Prospectus”), as supplemented by the prospectus supplement, dated May 26, 2017 (the “Prospectus Supplement”, together with the Base Prospectus, the “Offering Documents”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 26, 2017, under the 1933 Act. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined have the meanings set forth in the Offering Documents.
As special tax counsel to the Company, we have examined and relied upon originals or copies of such agreements, instruments, certificates, records and other documents and have made such examination of law as we have deemed necessary or appropriate for the purpose of this letter, including the following:
1. | Copy of the Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Company, as amended, in the form filed with the Commission. |
2. | Copy of the Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company in the form filed with the Commission. |
3. | A certificate containing certain factual representations and covenants of the Company (the “Officer’s Certificate”) relating to, among other things, the past, current, and proposed operations of the Company and the entities in which it holds a direct or indirect interest. |
4. | A copy of the Offering Documents. |
5. | Such other documentation or information provided to us by the Company or the Manager (as hereinafter defined) as we have deemed necessary or appropriate as a basis for our opinion set forth herein. |
Although we have made such inquiries and performed such investigations as we have deemed necessary for purposes of our opinion, we have not independently verified all of the facts, representations and covenants set forth in the Officer’s Certificate, the Offering Documents or in any other document.
We have assumed and relied on representations of the Manager, that the facts, representations and covenants contained in the Officer’s Certificate, the Offering Documents and other documents are accurate. We
have assumed that such factual statements, representations and covenants are true without regard to any qualification as to knowledge or belief.
Our opinion is conditioned on, among other things, the initial and continuing accuracy of the factual information, covenants and representations set forth in the Offering Documents and the Officer’s Certificate and the representations made by representatives of the Company and the Manager, without regard to any qualifications therein. Any change or inaccuracy in the facts referred to, set forth or assumed herein or in the Officer’s Certificate may affect our conclusions set forth herein.
Our opinion is also based on the correctness of the following assumptions: (i) the Company and each of the entities in which the Company holds a direct or indirect interest have been and will continue to be operated in accordance with the laws of the jurisdictions in which they were formed and in the manner described in the relevant organizational documents, (ii) there will be no changes in the applicable laws of the State of Maryland or of any other jurisdiction under the laws of which any such entity has been formed, and (iii) each of the written agreements to which the Company or any such entity is a party will be implemented, construed and enforced in accordance with its terms.
In rendering our opinion, we have also considered the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”), the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, judicial decisions, administrative rulings and other applicable authorities, in each case as in effect on the date hereof. The statutory provisions, regulations, decisions, rulings and other authorities on which this opinion is based are subject to change, and such changes could apply retroactively. A material change that is made after the date hereof in any of the foregoing bases for our opinion could affect our conclusions set forth herein.
In our examination, we have assumed (i) the legal capacity of all natural persons, (ii) the genuineness of all signatures, (iii) the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals, (iv) the conformity to original documents of all documents submitted to us as certified, conformed, or photostatic copies, and (v) the authenticity of the originals of such copies.
This opinion shall not be construed as or deemed to be a guaranty or insuring agreement. Opinions of special tax counsel represent only special tax counsel’s best legal judgment and are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or on any court. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the IRS will not challenge the conclusions of the opinion set forth herein or that such a challenge would not be successful.
Based on and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that:
1. | Commencing with the Company’s taxable year ending on December 31, 2011, the Company has been organized and operated in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a real estate investment trust (a “REIT”), and its current organization and proposed method of operation will enable it to continue to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code. In addition, the Company’s qualification and taxation as a REIT depend upon its ability to meet, through actual operating results, certain requirements relating to the sources of its income, the nature of its assets, its distribution levels and the diversity of its stock ownership, and various other qualification tests imposed under the Code, the results of which are not reviewed by us. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the actual results of the Company’s operations for any one taxable year will satisfy the requirements for taxation as a REIT under the Code. |
2. | Although the discussion set forth in the Offering Documents under the heading “U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” as supplemented by the discussion set forth in the Offering Documents under the heading “Supplemental Tax Disclosure” does not purport to summarize all possible U.S. federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the Common Stock, such discussion, though general in nature, constitutes in all material respects a fair and accurate summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership, and disposition of the Common Stock, subject to the qualifications set forth therein. The U.S. federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the Common Stock by an investor will |
depend upon that investor’s particular situation and we express no opinion as to the completeness of the discussion set forth in “U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” as applied to any particular investor.
Other than as expressly stated above, we express no opinion on any issue relating to the Company or to any investment therein or under any other law. Furthermore, the Company’s qualification as a REIT will depend upon the Company’s meeting, in its actual operations, the applicable asset composition, source of income, stockholder diversification, distribution and other requirements of the Code and Treasury Regulations necessary for a corporation to qualify as a REIT. We will not review these operations and no assurance can be given that the actual operations of the Company and any applicable affiliates will meet these requirements or the representations made to us with respect thereto.
This opinion has been prepared for you in connection with the Sales Agreement. We consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Form 8-K to be filed by the Company in connection with the execution of the Sales Agreement and to the reference to Sidley Austin LLP under the captions “Supplement to U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” and “Legal Matters” in the Offering Documents. In giving this consent, we do not thereby admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the 1933 Act or the rules and regulations of the Commission.
This opinion is expressed as of the date hereof, and we are under no obligation to supplement or revise our opinion to reflect any legal developments or factual matters arising subsequent to the date hereof, or the impact of any information, document, certificate, record, statement, representation, covenant, or assumption relied upon herein that becomes incorrect or untrue.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Sidley Austin LLP