Attached files
| file | filename |
|---|---|
| EX-35.1 - EXHIBIT 35.1 - CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2014-1 | caot2014-1ex351servicercom.htm |
| EX-34.1 - EXHIBIT 34.1 - CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2014-1 | ex341kpmgrptindregpubacctf.htm |
| EX-33.2 - EXHIBIT 33.2 - CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2014-1 | ex332wfreportonassessmento.htm |
| EX-33.1 - EXHIBIT 33.1 - CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2014-1 | ex331kmxreportonassessment.htm |
| EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2014-1 | caot2014-1ex311soxcertific.htm |
| 10-K - 10-K - CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2014-1 | caot2014-110xk051917.htm |
EXHIBIT 34.2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors
The Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association:
We have examined management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Assessment of Compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria, that the Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for asset-backed securities (“ABS”) transactions for which the Company provides trustee and/or paying agent services and for which (a) (i) some or all of the offered securities for such ABS transactions were publicly offered pursuant to a registration statement delivered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or (ii) the offered securities for such ABS transactions were privately issued pursuant to an exemption from registration, and the Company either has an obligation under the transaction agreements or was requested by the sponsor or depositor to deliver an assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB, and (b) the issuing entity has a fiscal year that ends on February 28 (or February 29, if applicable) (the “February ABS Platform”), as of and for the twelve months ended February 28, 2017. Management has determined that all the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are applicable to the Company’s obligations in the related transaction agreements with respect to the February ABS Platform as of and for the twelve months ended February 28, 2017, except for the following servicing criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(1)(v), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i) - 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the Company’s obligations in the related transaction agreements with respect to the February ABS Platform as of and for the twelve months ended February 28, 2017; provided however that, with respect to the February ABS Platform, servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to the Company’s obligation to make remittances to investors in accordance with the transaction agreements (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”). With respect to applicable servicing criterion 1122(d)(1)(ii), management has determined that there were no activities performed during the twelve months ended February 28, 2017 with respect to the February ABS Platform, because there were no occurrences of events that would require the Company to perform such activities. Appendix A to the Assessment of Compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria identifies the individual transactions defined by management as constituting the February ABS Platform. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the February ABS Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the February ABS Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.
Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.
In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended February 28, 2017 is fairly stated, in all material respects.
/s/KPMG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
April 21, 2017