LAKE SHORE BANCORP, INC. - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - LAKE SHORE BANCORP, INC.	lsbk-20170331xex32_2.htm
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - LAKE SHORE BANCORP, INC.	lsbk-20170331xex32_1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - LAKE SHORE BANCORP, INC.	lsbk-20170331xex31_2.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - LAKE SHORE BANCORP, INC.	lsbk-20170331xex31_1.htm

United States

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No.: 000-51821


LAKE SHORE BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

United States			20-4729288
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)			(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

31 East Fourth Street, Dunkirk, New York			14048
(Address of principal executive offices)			(Zip code)

(716) 366-4070
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X]No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [X]No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer ☐	Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company ☒
Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date:

There were 6,112,322 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding at May 4, 2017.


		TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM		PART I	PAGE

1	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	-	Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (Unaudited)	1
	-	Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (Unaudited)	2
	-	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (Unaudited)	3
	-	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (Unaudited)	4
	-	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (Unaudited)	5
	-	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	6
2	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		31
3	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK		42
4	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		43

		PART II

1A	RISK FACTORS		43
2	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS		43
6	EXHIBITS		44
SIGNATURES			44

PART I

Item 1. Financial Statements

Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary


Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	7,846	$	8,089
Interest earning deposits		9,890		6,889
Federal funds sold		16,149		30,501
Cash and Cash Equivalents		33,885		45,479
Securities available for sale		83,630		86,335
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost		1,340		1,340
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses 2017 $3,198; 2016 $2,882		345,032		326,365
Premises and equipment, net		8,625		8,747
Accrued interest receivable		1,800		1,600
Bank owned life insurance		17,806		17,719
Other assets		1,749		1,589
Total Assets	$	493,867	$	489,174
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Liabilities
Deposits:
Interest bearing	$	338,120	$	330,004
Non-interest bearing		52,690		55,889
Total Deposits		390,810		385,893
Long-term debt		18,950		18,950
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		2,249		3,183
Other liabilities		5,257		5,118
Total Liabilities	$	417,266	$	413,144
Commitments and Contingencies		-		-
Stockholders' Equity
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 6,827,236 shares issued and 6,115,822 shares outstanding at March 31, 2017 and 6,827,236 shares issued and 6,088,674 shares outstanding at December 31, 2016	$	68	$	68
Additional paid-in capital		30,571		30,532
Treasury stock, at cost (711,414 shares at March 31, 2017 and 738,562 shares at December 31, 2016)		(7,032)		(7,300)
Unearned shares held by ESOP		(1,599)		(1,620)
Unearned shares held by compensation plans		(783)		(578)
Retained earnings		54,076		53,546
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,300		1,382
Total Stockholders' Equity		76,601		76,030
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	493,867	$	489,174

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary


Consolidated Statements of Income
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
	(Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Interest Income
Loans, including fees	$	4,062	$	3,514
Investment securities, taxable		210		383
Investment securities, tax-exempt		448		451
Other		38		16
Total Interest Income		4,758		4,364
Interest Expense
Deposits		477		468
Long-term debt		92		96
Other		21		23
Total Interest Expense		590		587
Net Interest Income		4,168		3,777
Provision for Loan Losses		350		130
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses		3,818		3,647
Non-Interest Income
Service charges and fees		447		434
Earnings on bank owned life insurance		87		67
Recovery on previously impaired investment securities		39		35
Gain on sale of securities available for sale		25		1,636
Net gain on sale of loans		7		15
Other		25		23
Total Non-Interest Income		630		2,210
Non-Interest Expenses
Salaries and employee benefits		1,890		1,790
Occupancy and equipment		610		581
Data processing		307		265
Professional services		227		270
Advertising		167		113
Postage and supplies		63		54
FDIC Insurance		36		65
Other		277		264
Total Non-Interest Expenses		3,577		3,402
Income before Income Taxes		871		2,455
Income Tax Expense		155		501
Net Income	$	716	$	1,954
Basic and diluted earnings per common share	$	0.12	$	0.33
Dividends declared per share	$	0.08	$	0.07

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
	(Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands)

Net Income	$	716	$	1,954

Other Comprehensive Loss, net of tax benefit:
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on securities available for sale, net of tax benefit (expense)		(40)		975

Reclassification adjustments related to:
Recovery on previously impaired investment securities included in net income, net of tax expense		(26)		(23)
Net gain on sale of securities included in net income, net of tax expense		(16)		(1,080)
Total Other Comprehensive Loss		(82)		(128)

Total Comprehensive Income	$	634	$	1,826

Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (Unaudited)


							Unearned		Unearned Shares				Accumulated
			Additional				Shares		Held by				Other
	Common		Paid-In		Treasury		Held by		Compensation		Retained		Comprehensive
	Stock		Capital		Stock		ESOP		Plans		Earnings		Income		Total
	(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Balance - January 1, 2016	$	67	$	29,359	$	(7,026)	$	(1,706)	$	(580)	$	50,919	$	2,843	$	73,876
Net income		-		-		-		-		-		1,954		-		1,954
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit of $65		-		-		-		-		-		-		(128)		(128)
Stock options exercised (28,603 shares)		1		327		-		-		-		-		-		328
ESOP shares earned (1,984 shares)		-		5		-		22		-		-		-		27
Compensation plan shares granted (18,415 shares)		-		-		179		-		(179)		-		-		-
Compensation plan shares earned (5,092 shares)		-		10		-		-		54		-		-		64
Purchase of treasury stock, at cost (10,000 shares)		-		-		(136)		-		-		-		-		(136)
Cash dividends declared ($0.07 per share)		-		-		-		-		-		(157)		-		(157)
Balance - March 31, 2016	$	68	$	29,701	$	(6,983)	$	(1,684)	$	(705)	$	52,716	$	2,715	$	75,828

Balance - January 1, 2017	$	68	$	30,532	$	(7,300)	$	(1,620)	$	(578)	$	53,546	$	1,382	$	76,030
Net income		-		-		-		-		-		716		-		716
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit of $42		-		-		-		-		-		-		(82)		(82)
ESOP shares earned (1,984 shares)		-		10		-		21		-		-		-		31
Stock based compensation		-		11		-		-		-		-		-		11
Compensation plan shares granted (27,348 shares)		-		-		270		-		(270)		-		-		-
Compensation plan shares forfeited (200 shares)		-		-		(2)		-		2		-		-		-
Compensation plan shares earned (5,862 shares)		-		18		-		-		63		-		-		81
Cash dividends declared ($0.08 per share)		-		-		-		-		-		(186)		-		(186)
Balance - March 31, 2017	$	68	$	30,571	$	(7,032)	$	(1,599)	$	(783)	$	54,076	$	1,300	$	76,601

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
	(Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	716	$	1,954
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net amortization of investment securities		34		49
Net amortization of deferred loan costs		125		129
Provision for loan losses		350		130
Recovery on previously impaired investment securities		(39)		(35)
Gain on sale of investment securities		(25)		(1,636)
Originations of loans held for sale		(451)		(1,296)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale		458		1,311
Gain on sale of loans		(7)		(15)
Depreciation and amortization		225		216
Increase in bank owned life insurance, net		(87)		(67)
ESOP shares committed to be released		31		27
Stock based compensation expense		92		64
Increase in accrued interest receivable		(200)		(73)
(Increase) decrease in other assets		(116)		41
Increase in other liabilities		139		81
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities		1,245		880
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Activity in available for sale securities:
Sales		736		14,406
Maturities, prepayments and calls		2,274		2,615
Purchases		(399)		-
Redemptions of Federal Home Loan Bank Stock		-		99
Loan origination and principal collections, net		(19,142)		(4,877)
Additions to premises and equipment		(105)		(91)
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities		(16,636)		12,152
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in deposits		4,917		2,025
Net decrease in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		(934)		(889)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		700		-
Repayment of long-term debt		(700)		(2,200)
Proceeds from stock options exercised		-		328
Purchase of treasury stock		-		(136)
Cash dividends paid		(186)		(157)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities		3,797		(1,029)
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(11,594)		12,003
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - BEGINNING		45,479		34,227
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - ENDING	$	33,885	$	46,230
SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOWS INFORMATION
Interest paid	$	588	$	592
Income taxes paid	$	-	$	-

SUPPLEMENTARY SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Foreclosed real estate acquired in settlement of loans	$	-	$	32

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

The interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”, “us”, “our”, or “we”) and Lake Shore Savings Bank (the “Bank”), its wholly owned subsidiary. All intercompany accounts and transactions of the consolidated subsidiary have been eliminated in consolidation.

The interim consolidated financial statements included herein as of March 31, 2017 and for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and therefore, do not include all information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of the consolidated statements of financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The consolidated statement of financial condition at December 31, 2016 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of such information and to make the financial statements not misleading. These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. The consolidated statements of income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results for any subsequent period or the entire year ending December 31, 2017.

To prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management of the Company made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the reporting of revenue and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, securities valuation estimates, evaluation of impairment of securities and income taxes.

The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the statement of financial condition as of March 31, 2017 for items that should potentially be recognized or disclosed in these consolidated financial statements. The evaluation was conducted through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.

Note 2 – New Accounting Standards

The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-17, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” (“ASU 2015-17”). ASU 2015-17 was issued to simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes. The amendments in ASU 2015-17 require that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The amendments in ASU 2015- 17 apply to all entities that present a classified statement of financial position. The current requirement that deferred tax liabilities and assets of a tax-paying component of an entity be offset and presented as a single amount is not affected by the amendments in ASU 2015- 17. The adoption of ASU 2015-17 does not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or results of operations.

The Company adopted FASB ASU 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718)” (“ASU 2016-09”). ASU 2016-09 is intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 also eliminates the guidance in FASB Topic 718 that was indefinitely deferred shortly after the issuance of FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment”. This should not result in a change in practice because the guidance that is being superseded

was never effective. The adoption of 2016-09 does not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or results of operations.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08, “Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20)” (“ASU 2017-08”). ASU 2017-08 will amend the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium to the earliest call date. Under current GAAP, entities generally amortize the premium as an adjustment of yield over the contractual life of the instrument. ASU 2017-08 does not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. ASU 2017-08 is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2018 for all public business entities. Early application is permitted for any interim period. Management does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-08 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and results of operations.

Note 3 – Investment Securities

The amortized cost and fair value of securities are as follows:


	March 31, 2017
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
		(Dollars in thousands)
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE:
Municipal bonds	$	48,548	$	1,769	$	(12)	$	50,305
Mortgage-backed securities:
Collateralized mortgage obligations-private label		36		-		-		36
Collateralized mortgage obligations-government sponsored entities		27,403		79		(420)		27,062
Government National Mortgage Association		282		20		-		302
Federal National Mortgage Association		3,269		117		(14)		3,372
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation		1,745		50		-		1,795
Asset-backed securities-private label		289		350		(7)		632
Asset-backed securities-government sponsored entities		66		5		-		71
Equity securities		22		33		-		55
	$	81,660	$	2,423	$	(453)	$	83,630


	December 31, 2016
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
		(Dollars in thousands)
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE:
Municipal bonds	$	48,869	$	1,847	$	(18)	$	50,698
Mortgage-backed securities:
Collateralized mortgage obligations-private label		37		-		-		37
Collateralized mortgage obligations-government sponsored entities		29,170		83		(423)		28,830
Government National Mortgage Association		306		23		-		329
Federal National Mortgage Association		3,457		128		(3)		3,582
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation		1,825		42		-		1,867
Asset-backed securities-private label		484		362		(14)		832
Asset-backed securities-government sponsored entities		71		5		-		76
Equity securities		22		62		-		84
	$	84,241	$	2,552	$	(458)	$	86,335

All of our collateralized mortgage obligations are backed by one- to four-family residential mortgages.

At March 31, 2017 and at December 31, 2016, equity securities consisted of 22,368 shares of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) common stock.

At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, thirty-three municipal bonds and thirty-four municipal bonds, respectively, with a cost of $11.1 million and fair value of $11.5 million, were pledged under a collateral agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) of New York for liquidity borrowing. In addition at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 fourteen municipal bonds with a cost and fair value of $3.6 million and $3.7 million, respectively, were pledged as collateral for customer deposits in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance limits.

The following table sets forth the Company’s investment in securities available for sale with gross unrealized losses of less than twelve months and gross unrealized losses of twelve months or more and associated fair values as of the dates indicated:


	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
			Gross				Gross				Gross
			Unrealized				Unrealized				Unrealized
	Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses
	(Dollars In thousands)
March 31, 2017
Municipal bonds	$	1,223	$	(12)	$	-	$	-	$	1,223	$	(12)
Mortgage-backed securities		14,343		(211)		8,506		(223)		22,849		(434)
Asset-backed securities -private label		282		(7)		-		-		282		(7)
	$	15,848	$	(230)	$	8,506	$	(223)	$	24,354	$	(453)


December 31, 2016
Municipal bonds	$	1,430	$	(18)	$	-	$	-	$	1,430	$	(18)
Mortgage-backed securities		13,902		(197)		9,220		(229)		23,122		(426)
Asset-backed securities -private label		470		(14)		-		-		470		(14)
	$	15,802	$	(229)	$	9,220	$	(229)	$	25,022	$	(458)

The Company reviews investment securities on an ongoing basis for the presence of other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) with formal reviews performed quarterly.

At March 31, 2017, the Company’s investment portfolio included several securities, including two private label asset-backed securities, in the “unrealized losses less than twelve months” category. With the exception of the private label asset-backed securities, the securities were not evaluated further for OTTI as the unrealized losses on the individual securities were less than 20% of book value, which management deemed to be immaterial, and the securities were issued by government sponsored enterprises.

At March 31, 2017, the Company had several securities in the “unrealized losses twelve months or more” category. These securities were not evaluated further for OTTI, as the unrealized losses were less than 20% of book value. The temporary impairments were due to declines in fair value resulting from changes in interest rates and/or increased credit liquidity spreads since the securities were purchased.

The private label asset-backed securities were evaluated further for OTTI, as the probability of default is high and the Company’s analysis indicated a possible loss of principal. The following tables provide additional information relating to the two private label asset-backed securities as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):


At March 31, 2017
								Delinquent %
Security		Book Value		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss	Lowest Rating	Over 60 days	Over 90 days	Foreclosure%	OREO%
1	$	232	$	225	$	(7)	B-	15.40%	13.60%	6.50%	0.30%
2		57		57		-	B-	12.60%	11.10%	5.20%	0.80%
Total	$	289	$	282	$	(7)


At December 31, 2016
								Delinquent %
Security		Book Value		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss	Lowest Rating	Over 60 days	Over 90 days	Foreclosure%	OREO%
1	$	355	$	342	$	(13)	B-	15.90%	14.90%	7.00%	0.30%
2		129		128		(1)	B-	12.70%	11.70%	4.50%	1.10%
Total	$	484	$	470	$	(14)

Management’s evaluation of the estimated discounted cash flows in comparison to the amortized book value for the securities listed above did not reflect the need to record an OTTI charge against earnings as of March 31, 2017. The estimated discounted cash flows for these securities did not show an additional principal loss under various prepayment and default rate scenarios.

Management also completed an OTTI analysis for two private label asset-backed securities, which did not have unrealized losses as of March 31, 2017. Management’s calculation of the estimated discounted cash flows did not show additional principal losses for these securities under various prepayment and default rate scenarios. As a result of the stress tests that were performed, management concluded that additional OTTI charges were not required as of March 31, 2017 on these securities.

The unrealized losses shown in the previous table, were recorded as a component of other comprehensive loss, net of tax on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity.

The following table presents a summary of the credit-related OTTI charges recognized as components of income:


	For The Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
	(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	554	$	696
Additions:
Credit loss not previously recognized		-		-
Reductions:
Losses realized during the period on OTTI previously recognized		-		-
Receipt of cash flows on previously recorded OTTI		(39)		(35)
Ending balance	$	515	$	661

A deterioration in credit quality and/or other factors that may limit the liquidity of a security in our portfolio might adversely affect the fair values of the Company’s investment portfolio and may increase the potential that certain unrealized losses will be designated as “other-than-temporary” and that the Company may incur additional write-downs in future periods.

Scheduled contractual maturities of available for sale securities are as follows:


	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value
	(Dollars in thousands)
March 31, 2017:
After one year through five years	$	3,556	$	3,730
After five years through ten years		28,466		29,527
After ten years		16,526		17,048
Mortgage-backed securities		32,735		32,567
Asset-backed securities		355		703
Equity securities		22		55
	$	81,660	$	83,630

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company sold three municipal bonds for total proceeds of $736,000 resulting in realized gains of $25,000. During the three months ended March 31, 2016 the Company sold nine U.S. treasury bonds for total proceeds of $14.4 million resulting in realized gains of $1.6 million.

Note 4 - Allowance for Loan Losses

Management segregates the loan portfolio into loan types and analyzes the risk level for each loan type when determining its allowance for loan losses. The loan types are as follows:

Real Estate Loans:

One- to Four-Family – are loans secured by first lien collateral on residential real estate primarily held in the Western New York region. These loans can be affected by economic conditions and the value of underlying properties. Western New York’s housing market has consistently demonstrated stability in home prices despite economic conditions. Furthermore, the Company has conservative underwriting standards and its residential lending policies and procedures ensure that its one- to four-family residential mortgage loans generally conform to secondary market guidelines.

Home Equity - are loans or lines of credit secured by first or second liens on owner-occupied residential real estate primarily held in the Western New York region. These loans can also be affected by economic conditions and the values of underlying properties. Home equity loans may have increased risk of loss if the Company does not hold the first mortgage resulting in the Company being in a secondary position in the event of collateral liquidation. The Company does not originate interest only home equity loans.

Commercial Real Estate – are loans used to finance the purchase of real property, which generally consists of developed real estate that is held as first lien collateral for the loan. These loans are secured by real estate properties that are primarily held in the Western New York region. Commercial real estate lending involves additional risks compared with one- to four-family residential lending, because payments on loans secured by commercial real estate properties are often dependent on the successful operation or management of the properties, and/or the collateral value of the commercial real estate securing the loan, and repayment of such loans may be subject to adverse conditions in the real estate market or economic conditions to a greater extent than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Also, commercial real estate loans typically involve relatively large loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Accordingly, the nature of these types of loans make them more difficult for the Company to monitor and evaluate.

Construction – are loans to finance the construction of either one- to four-family owner occupied homes or commercial real estate. At the end of the construction period, the loan automatically converts to either a one- to four-family or commercial mortgage, as applicable. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the value of the property at completion compared to the actual cost of construction. The Company limits its risk during construction as disbursements are not made until the required work for each advance has been completed and an updated lien search is performed. The completion of the construction progress is verified by a Company loan officer or inspections performed by an independent appraisal firm. Construction delays may also impair the borrower’s ability to repay the loan.

Other Loans:

Commercial – includes business installment loans, lines of credit, and other commercial loans. Most of our commercial loans have fixed interest rates, and are for terms generally not in excess of 5 years. Whenever possible, we collateralize these loans with a lien on business assets and equipment and require the personal guarantees from principals of the borrower. Commercial loans generally involve a higher degree of credit risk because the collateral underlying the loans may be in the form of intangible assets and/or inventory subject to market obsolescence. Commercial loans can also involve relatively large loan balances to a single borrower or groups of related borrowers, with the repayment of such loans typically dependent on the successful operation of the commercial business and the income stream of the borrower. Such risks can be significantly affected by economic conditions. Although commercial loans may be collateralized by equipment or other business assets, the liquidation of collateral in the event of a borrower default may be an insufficient source of repayment because the equipment or other business assets may be obsolete or of limited use, among other things. Accordingly, the repayment of a commercial loan depends primarily on the credit worthiness of the borrowers (and any guarantors), while liquidation of collateral is a secondary and often insufficient source of repayment.

Consumer – consist of loans secured by collateral such as an automobile or a deposit account, unsecured loans and lines of credit. Consumer loans tend to have a higher credit risk due to the loans being either unsecured or secured by rapidly depreciable assets. Furthermore, consumer loan payments are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and therefore are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy.

The allowance for loan losses is a valuation account that reflects the Company’s evaluation of the losses inherent in its loan portfolio. In order to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, the Company estimates losses by loan type using historical loss factors, as well as other environmental factors, such as trends in loan volume and loan type, loan concentrations, changes in the experience, ability and depth of the Company’s lending management, and national and local economic conditions. The Company's determination as to the classification of loans and the amount of loss allowances are subject to review by bank regulators, which can require the establishment of additional loss allowances.

The Company also reviews all loans on which the collectability of principal may not be reasonably assured, by reviewing payment status, financial conditions and estimated value of loan collateral. These loans are assigned an internal loan grade, and the Company assigns an amount of loss allowances to these classified loans based on loan grade.

The following tables summarize the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 and the distribution of the allowance for loan losses and loan receivable by loan portfolio class and impairment method as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:


	Real Estate Loans								Other Loans
	One- to Four-Family		Home Equity		Commercial		Construction		Commercial		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
March 31, 2017
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Balance – January 1, 2017	$	431	$	114	$	1,803	$	150	$	338	$	28	$	18	$	2,882
Charge-offs		-		-		-		-		(18)		(22)		-		(40)
Recoveries		1		-		-		-		1		4		-		6
Provision		28		3		165		43		60		11		40		350
Balance – March 31, 2017	$	460	$	117	$	1,968	$	193	$	381	$	21	$	58	$	3,198
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	-	$	-	$	390	$	-	$	10	$	-	$	-	$	400
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	460	$	117	$	1,578	$	193	$	371	$	21	$	58	$	2,798

Gross Loans Receivable (1):
Ending balance	$	147,864	$	35,978	$	117,702	$	18,014	$	24,408	$	1,267	$	-	$	345,233
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	189	$	22	$	1,907	$	-	$	159	$	-	$	-	$	2,277
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	147,675	$	35,956	$	115,795	$	18,014	$	24,249	$	1,267	$	-	$	342,956

(1)

Gross Loans Receivable does not include allowance for loan losses of $(3,198) or deferred loan costs of $2,997.

	Real Estate Loans								Other Loans
	One- to Four-Family		Home Equity		Commercial		Construction		Commercial		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
March 31, 2016
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Balance – January 1, 2016	$	351	$	120	$	1,204	$	59	$	197	$	22	$	32	$	1,985
Charge-offs		(49)		(3)		-		-		(4)		(11)		-		(67)
Recoveries		1		-		-		-		-		3		-		4
Provision (Credit)		154		14		(109)		38		34		15		(16)		130
Balance – March 31, 2016	$	457	$	131	$	1,095	$	97	$	227	$	29	$	16	$	2,052


	Real Estate Loans									Other Loans
	One- to Four-Family		Home Equity		Commercial		Construction		Commercial		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)

December 31, 2016
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Balance – December 31, 2016	$	431	$	114	$	1,803	$	150	$	338	$	28	$	18	$	2,882
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	-	$	-	$	390	$	-	$	10	$	-	$	-	$	400
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	431	$	114	$	1,413	$	150	$	328	$	28	$	18	$	2,482

Gross Loans Receivable (1):
Ending Balance	$	149,333	$	35,534	$	107,243	$	12,361	$	20,447	$	1,313	$	-	$	326,231
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	190	$	22	$	3,162	$	-	$	163	$	-	$	-	$	3,537
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	149,143	$	35,512	$	104,081	$	12,361	$	20,284	$	1,313	$	-	$	322,694

⁽¹⁾

Gross Loans Receivable does not include allowance for loan losses of $(2,882) or deferred loan costs of $3,016.

Although the allocations noted above are by loan type, the allowance for loan losses is general in nature and is available to offset losses from any loan in the Company’s portfolio. The unallocated component of the allowance for loan losses reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for existing specific and general losses in the portfolio.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will not be able to collect the scheduled payments of principal and interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled payments when due. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial real estate loans and commercial loans. Larger groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Company does not separately identify individual consumer, home equity, or one- to four-family loans for impairment disclosure, unless they are subject to a troubled debt restructuring.

The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans for the periods indicated:


			Unpaid				Average		Interest
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized
							For the Three Months Ended
	At March 31, 2017						March 31, 2017
	(Dollars in thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Residential, one- to four-family	$	189	$	189	$	-	$	189	$	3
Home equity		22		22		-		22		-
Commercial real estate		889		889		-		1,555		212
Commercial loans		54		54		-		54		-
Total impaired loans with no related allowance		1,154		1,154		-		1,820		215

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate		1,018		1,018		390		1,018		-
Commercial loans		105		105		10		106		-
Total impaired loans with an allowance		1,123		1,123		400		1,124		-

Total of impaired loans:
Residential, one- to four-family		189		189		-		189		3
Home equity		22		22		-		22		-
Commercial real estate		1,907		1,907		390		2,573		212
Commercial loans		159		159		10		160		-
Total impaired loans	$	2,277	$	2,277	$	400	$	2,944	$	215


			Unpaid				Average		Interest
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized
							For the Year Ended
	At December 31, 2016						December 31, 2016
	(Dollars in thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Residential, one- to four-family	$	190	$	190	$	-	$	224	$	14
Home equity		22		22		-		24		1
Commercial real estate		2,148		2,148		-		2,299		29
Commercial loans		54		54		-		71		-
Total impaired loans with no related allowance		2,414		2,414		-		2,618		44

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate		1,014		1,014		390		1,011		31
Commercial loans		109		109		10		135		5
Total impaired loans with an allowance		1,123		1,123		400		1,146		36

Total of impaired loans:
Residential, one- to four-family		190		190		-		224		14
Home equity		22		22		-		24		1
Commercial real estate		3,162		3,162		390		3,310		60
Commercial loans		163		163		10		206		5
Total impaired loans	$	3,537	$	3,537	$	400	$	3,764	$	80

The following table provides an analysis of past due loans and non-accruing loans as of the dates indicated:


					90 Days or
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		More		Total Past			Current	Total Loans		Loans on
	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Due			Due	Receivable		Non-Accrual
	(Dollars in thousands)
March 31, 2017:
Real Estate Loans:
Residential, one- to four-family	$	870	$	711	$	1,057	$	2,638	$	145,226	$	147,864	$	2,205
Home equity		185		57		259		501		35,477		35,978		335
Commercial		-		-		1,725		1,725		115,977		117,702		1,725
Construction		-		-		-		-		18,014		18,014		-
Other Loans:
Commercial		5		3		54		62		24,346		24,408		159
Consumer		13		6		18		37		1,230		1,267		21
Total	$	1,073	$	777	$	3,113	$	4,963	$	340,270	$	345,233	$	4,445

					90 Days or
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		More		Total Past			Current	Total Loans		Loans on
	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Due			Due	Receivable		Non-Accrual
	(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2016:
Real Estate Loans:
Residential, one- to four-family	$	1,192	$	782	$	1,038	$	3,012	$	146,321	$	149,333	$	2,165
Home equity		141		206		158		505		35,029		35,534		329
Commercial		-		-		2,977		2,977		104,266		107,243		2,977
Construction		-		-		-		-		12,361		12,361		-
Other Loans:
Commercial		-		19		56		75		20,372		20,447		205
Consumer		31		-		28		59		1,254		1,313		28
Total	$	1,364	$	1,007	$	4,257	$	6,628	$	319,603	$	326,231	$	5,704

The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when, in management’s opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet payments as they become due. A loan does not have to be 90 days delinquent in order to be classified as non-accrual. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. If ultimate collection of principal is in doubt, all cash receipts on impaired loans are applied to reduce the principal balance. Interest income not recognized on non-accrual loans during the three month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was $82,000 and $72,000, respectively.

The Company’s policies provide for the classification of loans as follows:

Pass/Performing;

Special Mention – does not currently expose the Company to a sufficient degree of risk but does possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving the Company’s close attention;

Substandard – has one or more well-defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. A substandard asset would be one inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or pledged collateral, if applicable;

Doubtful – has all the weaknesses inherent in substandard loans with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values questionable, and there is a high possibility of loss; and

Loss – loan is considered uncollectible and continuance without the establishment of a specific valuation reserve is not warranted.

The Company’s Asset Classification Committee is responsible for monitoring risk ratings and making changes as deemed appropriate. Each commercial loan is individually assigned a loan classification. The Company’s consumer loans, including residential one- to four-family loans and home equity loans, are not classified as described above. Instead, the Company uses the delinquency status as the basis for classifying these loans. Generally, all consumer loans more than 90 days past due are classified and placed in non-accrual. Such loans that are well-secured and in the process of collection will remain in accrual status.

The following table summarizes the internal loan grades applied to the Company’s loan portfolio as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:


	Pass/Performing		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
March 31, 2017
Real Estate Loans:
Residential, one- to four-family	$	144,931	$	-	$	2,933	$	-	$	-	$	147,864
Home equity		35,364		-		614		-		-		35,978
Commercial		113,969		464		3,269		-		-		117,702
Construction		18,014		-		-		-		-		18,014
Other Loans:
Commercial		23,906		14		488		-		-		24,408
Consumer		1,266		-		-		-		1		1,267
Total	$	337,450	$	478	$	7,304	$	-	$	1	$	345,233


	Pass/Performing		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2016
Real Estate Loans:
Residential, one- to four-family	$	146,333	$	-	$	3,000	$	-	$	-	$	149,333
Home equity		35,025		-		509		-		-		35,534
Commercial		102,216		1,759		3,268		-		-		107,243
Construction		12,361		-		-		-		-		12,361
Other Loans:
Commercial		19,865		297		270		15		-		20,447
Consumer		1,306		-		6		-		1		1,313
Total	$	317,106	$	2,056	$	7,053	$	15	$	1	$	326,231

Troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) occur when we grant borrowers concessions that we would not otherwise grant but for economic or legal reasons pertaining to the borrower’s financial difficulties. A concession is made when the terms of the loan modification are more favorable than the terms the borrower would have received in the current market under similar financial difficulties. These concessions may include, but are not limited to, modifications of the terms of the debt, the transfer of assets or the issuance of an equity interest by the borrower to satisfy all or part of the debt, or the addition of borrower(s). The Company identifies loans for potential TDRs primarily through direct communication with the borrower and evaluation of the borrower’s financial statements, revenue projections, tax returns, and credit reports. Even if the borrower is not presently in default, management will consider the likelihood that cash flow shortages, adverse economic conditions, and negative trends may result in a payment default in the near future. Generally, we will not return a TDR to accrual status until the borrower has demonstrated the ability to make principal and interest payments under the restructured terms for at least six consecutive months. The Company’s TDRs are impaired loans, which may result in specific allocations and subsequent charge-offs if appropriate.

The following table summarizes the loans that were classified as TDRs as of the dates indicated:


					Non-Accruing				Accruing				TDRs That Have Defaulted on Modified Terms Year to Date
	Number of Loans		Recorded Investment		Number of Loans		Recorded Investment		Number of Loans		Recorded Investment		Number of Loans		Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
At March 31, 2017
Real Estate Loans:
Residential, one- to four-family		5	$	189		-	$	-		5	$	189		-	$	-
Home equity		2		22		1		19		1		3		-		-
Other Loans:
Commercial		1		105		1		105		-		-		-		-
Total		8	$	316		2	$	124		6	$	192		-	$	-


At December 31, 2016
Real Estate Loans:
Residential, one- to four-family		5	$	190		-	$	-		5	$	190		-	$	-
Home equity		2		22		1		19		1		3		-		-
Other Loans:
Commercial		1		109		1		109		-		-		-		-
Total		8	$	321		2	$	128		6	$	193		-	$	-

No additional loan commitments were outstanding to these borrowers at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

There were no loans restructured and classified as TDRs during the three months ended March 31, 2017.

The following table details the activity in loans which were first deemed to be TDRs during the three months ended March 31, 2016:


	For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
	Number of Loans		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real Estate Loans:
Residential, one- to four-family		1	$	31	$	31
Total		1	$	31	$	31

The loan above was deemed to be a TDR due to the borrower’s financial difficulties and due to modifications of the terms of the debt related to the bankruptcy of the borrower.

Some loan modifications classified as TDRs may not ultimately result in full collection of principal and interest, as modified, which may result in potential losses. These potential losses have been factored into our overall estimate of the allowance for loan losses.

Foreclosed real estate consists of property acquired in settlement of loans which is carried at its fair value less estimated selling costs. Write-downs from cost to fair value less estimated selling costs are recorded at the date of acquisition or repossession and are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Foreclosed real estate was $408,000 and $412,000 at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and was included as a component of other assets on the consolidated statements of financial condition. The recorded investment of consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceeds

are in process according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction was $1.1 million and $767,000 at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Note 5 – Earnings per Share

Earnings per share was calculated for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Basic earnings per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, exclusive of unearned shares held by the Employee Stock Ownership Plan of Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. (the “ESOP”), unearned shares held by the Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Recognition and Retention Plan (“RRP”), and unearned shares held by the Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (“EIP”). Diluted earnings per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and common share equivalents that would arise from the exercise of dilutive securities. Stock options are regarded as potential common stock and are considered in the diluted earnings per share calculations to the extent they would be dilutive and computed using the treasury stock method.

The calculated basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
Numerator – net income	$	716,000	$	1,954,000
Denominator:
Basic weighted average shares outstanding		6,090,190		5,961,872
Increase in weighted average shares outstanding due to:
Stock options		9,105		20,505
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding (1)		6,099,295		5,982,377

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.12	$	0.33
Diluted	$	0.12	$	0.33

⁽¹⁾

Stock options to purchase 64,547 shares under the Company’s 2006 Stock Option Plan and 20,000 shares under the EIP at $14.38 were outstanding during the three month period ended March 31, 2017 but were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because to do so would have been anti-dilutive.

Note 6 – Commitments to Extend Credit

The Company has commitments to extend credit with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

The Company’s exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of these commitments. There were no loss reserves associated with these commitments at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The Company follows the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

The following commitments to extend credit were outstanding as of the dates specified:


	Contract Amount
	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(Dollars in thousands)

Commitments to grant loans	$	14,042	$	24,707
Unfunded commitments under lines of credit	$	33,156	$	35,356

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. The commitments for lines of credit may expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemed necessary by the Company, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company’s loan commitments with fixed rates for the next five years totaled $10.7 million and $12.0 million, respectively. The range of interest rates on these fixed rate commitments was 3.75% to 6.25% at March 31, 2017.

Note 7 – Stock-based Compensation

As of March 31, 2017, the Company had four stock-based compensation plans, which are described below. The compensation cost that has been recorded under salary and benefits expense in the non-interest expense section of the consolidated statements of income for these plans was $123,000 and $92,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

2006 Stock Option Plan

The Company’s 2006 Stock Option Plan (the “Stock Option Plan”), which was approved by the Company’s stockholders, permitted the grant of options to its employees and non-employee directors for up to 297,562 shares of common stock. The Stock Option Plan expired on October 24, 2016, and grants of options can no longer be awarded.

Both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options have been granted under the Stock Option Plan. The exercise price of each stock option equals the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and an option’s maximum term is ten years. The stock options generally vest over a five year period.

A summary of the status of the Stock Option Plan as of March 31, 2017 and 2016 is presented below:


	March 31, 2017				March 31, 2016
	Options		Exercise Price	Remaining Contractual Life	Options		Exercise Price	Remaining Contractual Life
Outstanding at beginning of year	82,826	$	12.95		118,087	$	10.68
Granted	-		-		-		-
Exercised	-		-		(28,603)		11.44
Forfeited	-		-		-		-
Outstanding at end of period	82,826	$	12.95	8.1 years	89,484	$	10.44	1.4 years

Options exercisable at end of period	18,279	$	7.88	8.1 years	89,484	$	10.44	1.4 years

Fair value of options granted		$	-			$	-

At March 31, 2017, stock options outstanding had an intrinsic value of $218,000 and there were no remaining options available for grant under the Stock Option Plan. There were no stock options exercised during the three month period ended March 31, 2017. The intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the three month

period ended March 31, 2016 was $53,000. Compensation expense related to the Stock Option Plan for the three month period ended March 31, 2017 was $8,000. There was no compensation expense related to the Stock Option Plan for the three month period ended March 31, 2016. At March 31, 2017, $155,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to the Stock Option Plan is expected to be recognized over a period of 55 months.

2006 Recognition and Retention Plan

The Company’s 2006 Recognition and Retention Plan (“RRP”), which was approved by the Company’s stockholders, permitted the grant of restricted stock awards (“Awards”) to employees and non-employee directors for up to 119,025 shares of common stock. The RRP expired on October 24, 2016, and as of October 24, 2016 all shares permitted under the plan have been granted.

As of March 31, 2017, there were 94,915 shares vested or distributed to eligible participants under the RRP. Compensation expense amounted to $22,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and $16,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016. At March 31, 2017, $263,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to the RRP is expected to be recognized over a period of 3 to 55 months.

A summary of the status of unvested shares under the RRP for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:


	2017		Weighted Average Grant Price (per Share)	2016		Weighted Average Grant Price (per Share)
Unvested shares outstanding at beginning of year	24,110	$	12.96	21,397	$	12.25
Granted	-		-	-		-
Vested	-		-	-		-
Forfeited	-		-	-		-
Unvested shares outstanding at end of period	24,110	$	12.96	21,397	$	12.25

2012 Equity Incentive Plan

The Company’s 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “EIP”), which was approved by the Company’s stockholders on May 23, 2012, authorizes the issuance of up to 180,000 shares of common stock pursuant to grants of restricted stock awards and up to 20,000 shares of common stock pursuant to grants of incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options, subject to permitted adjustments for certain corporate transactions. Employees and directors of Lake Shore Bancorp or its subsidiaries are eligible to receive awards under the EIP, except that non-employees may not be granted incentive stock options.

The Board of Directors granted restricted stock awards under the EIP during 2017 as follows:


Grant Date	Number of Restricted Stock Awards	Vesting		Fair Value per Share of Award on Grant Date	Awardees

February 8, 2017	21,675	100% on December 15, 2019, if three year performance metric is achieved	$	15.90	Employees
February 8, 2017	5,673	100% on December 15, 2017		15.90	Non-employee directors

A summary of the status of unvested restricted stock awards under the EIP for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:


	2017		Weighted Average Grant Price (per Share)	2016		Weighted Average Grant Price (per Share)
Unvested shares outstanding at beginning of year	26,072	$	12.77	27,769	$	12.64
Granted	27,348		15.90	18,415		13.38
Vested	-		-	-		-
Forfeited	(100)		13.35	-		-
Unvested shares outstanding at end of period	53,320	$	14.38	46,184	$	12.93

As of March 31, 2017, there were 21,917 shares vested or distributed to eligible participants under the EIP. Compensation expense related to the EIP amounted to $59,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and $49,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016. At March 31, 2017, $629,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards is expected to be recognized over a period of 9 to 33 months.

A summary of the status of stock options awarded in the fourth quarter of 2016 under the EIP for the three months ended March 31, 2017 is presented below:


	March 31, 2017
	Options		Exercise Price	Remaining Contractual Life
Outstanding at beginning of year	20,000	$	14.38
Granted	-		-
Exercised	-		-
Forfeited	-		-
Outstanding at end of period	20,000	$	14.38	9.6 years

Options exercisable at end of period	-	$	-

Fair value of options granted			-

At March 31, 2017, stock options outstanding had an intrinsic value of $24,000 and there were no remaining options available for grant under the EIP. Compensation expense amounted to $3,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and there was no compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2016. At March 31, 2017, $48,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options is expected to be recognized over a period of 55 months.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”)

The Company established the ESOP for the benefit of eligible employees of the Company and Bank. All Company and Bank employees meeting certain age and service requirements are eligible to participate in the ESOP. Participants’ benefits become fully vested after five years of service once the employee is eligible to participate in the ESOP. The Company utilized $2.6 million of the proceeds of its 2006 stock offering to extend a loan to the ESOP and the ESOP used such proceeds to purchase 238,050 shares of stock on the open market at an average price of $10.70 per share, plus commission expenses. As a result of the purchase of shares by the ESOP, total stockholders’ equity of the Company was reduced by $2.6 million. As of March 31, 2017, the balance of the loan to the ESOP was $1.6 million and the fair value of unallocated shares was $2.3 million. As of March 31, 2017, there were 66,486 allocated shares and 150,765 unallocated shares compared to 65,549 allocated shares and 158,699 unallocated shares at March 31, 2016. The ESOP compensation expense

was $31,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and $27,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 based on 1,984 shares earned in each of those quarters.

Note 8 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could have realized in a sale transaction on the dates indicated. The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and have not been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these consolidated financial statements subsequent to those respective dates. The estimated fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting dates may be different than the amounts reported here.

The measurement of fair value under FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC Topic 820”) establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities measurements (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable input measurements (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC Topic 820 are as follows:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity can access at the measurement date.

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.

An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

For assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were as follows:


	Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2017
	March 31,		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Other Unobservable Inputs
	2017		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
		(Dollars in thousands)
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Securities available for sale:
Municipal bonds	$	50,305	$	-	$	50,305	$	-
Mortgage-backed securities:
Collateralized mortgage obligations-private label		36		-		36		-
Collateralized mortgage obligations-government sponsored entities		27,062		-		27,062		-
Government National Mortgage Association		302		-		302		-
Federal National Mortgage Association		3,372		-		3,372		-
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation		1,795		-		1,795		-
Asset-backed securities:
Private label		632		-		-		632
Government sponsored entities		71		-		71		-
Equity securities		55		-		55		-
Total	$	83,630	$	-	$	82,998	$	632


	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016
	December 31,		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Other Unobservable Inputs
	2016		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
		(Dollars in thousands)
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Securities available for sale:
Municipal bonds	$	50,698	$	-	$	50,698	$	-
Mortgage-backed securities:
Collateralized mortgage obligations-private label		37		-		37		-
Collateralized mortgage obligations-government sponsored entities		28,830		-		28,830		-
Government National Mortgage Association		329		-		329		-
Federal National Mortgage Association		3,582		-		3,582		-
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation		1,867		-		1,867		-
Asset-backed securities:
Private label		832		-		-		832
Government sponsored entities		76		-		76		-
Equity securities		84		-		84		-
Total	$	86,335	$	-	$	85,503	$	832

Any transfers between levels would be recognized as of the actual date of event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. There were no reclassifications between the Level 1 and Level 2 categories for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Level 2 inputs for assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the securities available for sale measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), specifically, asset-backed securities - private label, for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:


	2017		2016
		(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning Balance	$	832	$	1,501
Total gains - realized/unrealized:
Included in earnings		-		-
Included in other comprehensive income(loss)		7		16
Total losses - realized/unrealized:
Included in earnings		-		-
Included in other comprehensive income(loss)		(12)		(11)
Sales		-		-
Principal paydowns		(195)		(120)
Transfers to (out of) Level 3		-		-
Ending Balance	$	632	$	1,386

Both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine the fair value of assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis that the Company has classified within the Level 3 category. As a result, any unrealized gains and losses for assets within the Level 3 category may include changes in fair value attributable to both observable (e.g., changes in market interest rates) and unobservable (e.g., changes in unobservable long-dated volatilities) inputs.

The following table presents additional quantitative information about the Level 3 inputs for the asset-backed securities - private label category. The fair values for this category were developed using the discounted cash flow technique with the following unobservable input ranges as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):

Unobservable Inputs

Security Category

Fair Value

Loan Type/Collateral

Credit Ratings

Constant Prepayment Speed (CPR)

Probability of Default (Annual Default Rate)

Loss Severity

March 31, 2017

Asset-backed securities - private label

632

Sub-prime First and Prime Second Lien - Residential Real Estate

B- thru D

5 - 12

3.0-5.0%

70.0% - 100.0%

December 31, 2016

Asset-backed securities - private label

832

Sub-prime First and Prime Second Lien - Residential Real Estate

B- thru D

5 - 10

5.0%

70.0% - 100.0%

Level 3 inputs are determined by the Company’s management using inputs from its third party financial advisor on a quarterly basis. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the reporting entity’s asset-backed, private label securities are prepayment rates, probability of default and loss severity in the event of default. Significant increases or decreases in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement. Generally, a change in the assumption used for the probability of default is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for the loss severity and a directionally opposite change in the assumption used for prepayment rates.

In addition to disclosure of the fair value of assets on a recurring basis, ASC Topic 820 requires disclosures for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, such as impaired assets and foreclosed real estate. Loans are generally not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Periodically, the Company records non-recurring adjustments to the carrying value of loans based on fair value measurements for partial charge-offs of the uncollectible portions of these loans. Non-recurring adjustments also include certain impairment amounts for collateral-dependent loans calculated as required by ASC Topic 310, “Receivables – Loan Impairment,” when establishing the allowance for loan losses. An impaired loan is carried at fair value based on either a recent appraisal less estimated selling costs of underlying collateral or discounted cash flows based on current market conditions.

For assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were as follows:


	Fair Value Measurements
			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Other Unobservable Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
		(Dollars in thousands)
Measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:

At March 31, 2017
Impaired loans	$	759	$	-	$	-	$	759
Foreclosed real estate		264		-		-		264

At December 31, 2016
Impaired loans	$	760	$	-	$	-	$	760
Foreclosed real estate		241		-		-		241

The following table presents additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

(Dollars in thousands)

Fair Value Estimate

Valuation Technique

Unobservable Input

Range

At March 31, 2017

Impaired loans

759

Market valuation of underlying collateral (1) and discounted cash flows (2)

Direct Disposal Costs (3)

7.00-33.00%

Foreclosed real estate

264

Market valuation of property (1)

Direct Disposal Costs (3)

7.00-10.00%

At December 31, 2016

Impaired loans

760

Market valuation of underlying collateral (1) and discounted cash flows (2)

Direct Disposal Costs (3)

7.00-33.00%

Foreclosed real estate

241

Market valuation of property (1)

Direct Disposal Costs (3)

7.00-10.00%

⁽¹⁾

Fair value is generally determined through independent third-party appraisals of the underlying collateral, which generally includes various Level 3 inputs which are not observable.

⁽²⁾

Fair value is generally determined using a discounted future cash flow method for non-collateral dependent loans. This method takes into account interest rates currently being offered to customers for loans with similar terms and with estimated maturity. The estimate of maturity is based on the borrower’s contractual cash flows and may be adjusted for prepayment estimates based on current economic and lending conditions.

⁽³⁾

The fair value basis of impaired loans and foreclosed real estate may be adjusted to reflect management estimates of disposal costs including, but not necessarily limited to, real estate brokerage commissions, legal fees, and delinquent property taxes.

At March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016 impaired loans valued using Level 3 inputs had a carrying amount of $1.2 million and valuation allowances of $400,000.

Once a loan is determined to be impaired, the fair value of the loan continues to be evaluated based upon the market value of the underlying collateral securing the loan or by using a discounted future cash flow method if the loan is not collateral dependent. At March 31, 2017, there were no impaired loans whose carrying amount was written down utilizing Level 3 inputs during the three month period ended March 31, 2017. At December 31, 2016, impaired loans whose carrying amount was written down utilizing Level 3 inputs during the year ended December 31, 2016 comprised of two loans with a fair value of $1.0 million and resulted in an additional provision for loan loss of $400,000.

At March 31, 2017, foreclosed real estate valued using Level 3 inputs had a carrying amount of $368,000 and valuation allowances of $104,000. By comparison at December 31, 2016, foreclosed real estate valued using Level 3 inputs had a carrying amount of $341,000 and valuation allowances of $100,000.

Once a loan is foreclosed, the fair value of the real estate owned continues to be evaluated based upon the market value of the repossessed real estate originally securing the loan. At March 31, 2017, foreclosed real estate whose carrying value was written down utilizing Level 3 inputs during the three months ended March 31, 2017 comprised of one property with a fair value of $25,000 and a $4,000 subsequent write-down, which was recorded in non-interest expense. At December 31, 2016, foreclosed real estate whose carrying value was written down utilizing Level 3 inputs during the year ended December 31, 2016 comprised of six properties with a fair value of $217,000 and resulted in an additional provision for loan losses of $73,000 and subsequent write-downs recorded in non-interest expense of $6,000.

The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments, whether carried at cost or fair value, are as follows:


	Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2017
	Carrying		Estimated		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Other Unobservable Inputs
	Amount		Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	33,885	$	33,885	$	33,885	$	-	$	-
Securities available for sale		83,630		83,630		-		82,998		632
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,340		1,340		-		1,340		-
Loans receivable, net		345,032		339,969		-		-		339,969
Accrued interest receivable		1,800		1,800		-		1,800		-
Financial liabilities:
Deposits		390,810		393,961		-		393,961		-
Long-term debt		18,950		19,000		-		19,000		-
Accrued interest payable		34		34		-		34		-
Off-balance-sheet financial instruments		-		-		-		-		-


	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016
	Carrying		Estimated		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Other Unobservable Inputs
	Amount		Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	45,479	$	45,479	$	45,479	$	-	$	-
Securities available for sale		86,335		86,335		-		85,503		832
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,340		1,340		-		1,340		-
Loans receivable, net		326,365		322,031		-		-		322,031
Accrued interest receivable		1,600		1,600		-		1,600		-
Financial liabilities:
Deposits		385,893		388,855		-		388,855		-
Long-term debt		18,950		18,984		-		18,984		-
Accrued interest payable		32		32		-		32		-
Off-balance-sheet financial instruments		-		-		-		-		-

The following valuation techniques were used to measure the fair value of financial instruments in the above table:

Cash and cash equivalents (carried at cost)

The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value.

Securities available for sale (carried at fair value)

The fair value of securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1) or matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities, but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution date, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the security’s terms and conditions, among other things. Level 2 securities which are fixed income instruments that are not quoted on an exchange, but are traded in active markets, are valued using prices obtained from our custodian, who use third party data service providers. Securities available for sale measured within the Level 3 category consist of private label asset-backed securities. The fair value measurement for these Level 3 securities is explained more fully earlier in this footnote.

Federal Home Loan Bank stock (carried at cost)

The carrying amount of Federal Home Loan Bank stock approximates fair value.

Loans Receivable, net (carried at cost)

The fair value of fixed-rate and variable rate performing loans is estimated using a discounted cash flow method. The discount rates take into account interest rates currently being offered to customers for loans with similar terms and with estimated maturity and market factors including liquidity. The estimate of maturity is based on the Company’s contractual cash flows adjusted for prepayment estimates based on current economic and lending conditions. Due to the significant judgment involved in evaluating credit quality, loans are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable (carried at cost)

The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable and payable approximates fair value.

Deposits (carried at cost)

The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as savings, money market and checking is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date and are classified within Level 2 of the fair value

hierarchy. The fair value of time deposits is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows at current rates of interest for similar deposits using market rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. Due to the minimal amount of unobservable inputs involved in evaluating assumptions used for discounted cash flows of time deposits, these deposits are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Borrowings (carried at cost)

The fair value of long-term debt was calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows at current market rates of interest for similar borrowings through maturity of each instrument. Due to the minimal amount of unobservable inputs involved in evaluating assumptions used for discounted cash flows of long-term debt, they are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments (disclosed at cost)

Fair values of the Company’s off-balance sheet financial instruments (lending commitments) are based on interest rates and fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account, the remaining terms of the commitments and the counterparties’ credit standing. Other than loan commitments, the Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on its financial condition.

Note 9 – Treasury Stock

During the quarter ended March 31, 2017, the Company did not repurchase any shares of common stock. As of March 31, 2017, there were 84,501 shares remaining to be repurchased under the existing stock repurchase program. During the quarter ended March 31, 2017, the Company transferred 27,348 shares of common stock out of the treasury stock reserved for the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, at an average cost of $9.88 per share to fund awards that had been granted under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. During the quarter ended March 31, 2017, there were 200 shares transferred back into treasury stock reserved for the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at an average cost of $9.55 per share due to stock forfeitures.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Company repurchased 10,000 shares of common stock at an average cost of $13.58 per share. These shares were repurchased pursuant to the Company’s publicly announced common stock repurchase programs. As of March 31, 2016 there were 107,701 shares remaining to be repurchased under the existing stock repurchase program. During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Company transferred 18,415 shares of common stock out of the treasury stock reserved for the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, at an average cost of $9.70 per share to fund awards that had been granted under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.

Note 10 – Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income

In addition to presenting the Consolidated Statements of Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) herein, the following table shows the tax effects allocated to the Company’s single component of other comprehensive loss for the periods presented:


	For the Three Months Ended						For the Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017							March 31, 2016
	Pre-Tax Amount		Tax Benefit		Net of Tax Amount		Pre-Tax Amount		Tax (Expense) Benefit		Net of Tax Amount
	(Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Net unrealized (losses) gains on securities available for sale:
Net unrealized (losses) gains arising during the period	$	(60)	$	20	$	(40)	$	1,478	$	(503)	$	975
Less: reclassification adjustment related to:
Recovery on previously impaired investment securities included in net income		(39)		13		(26)		(35)		12		(23)
Gain on sale of securities included in net income		(25)		9		(16)		(1,636)		556		(1,080)
Total Other Comprehensive Loss	$	(124)	$	42	$	(82)	$	(193)	$	65	$	(128)

The following table presents the amounts reclassified out of the single component of the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive loss for the indicated periods:


	Amounts Reclassified from
Details about Accumulated	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income	for the three months ended March 31,				Affected Line Item on the Consolidated
Components	2017		2016		Statements of Income
	(Dollars in thousands)
Net unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale
Recovery on previously impaired investment securities	$	(39)	$	(35)	Recovery on previously impaired investment securities
Sale of securities		(25)		(1,636)	Gain on sale of securities available for sale
		(64)		(1,671)
Provision for income tax expense		22		568	Income Tax Expense
Total reclassification for the period	$	(42)	$	(1,103)	Net Income

Note 11 – Subsequent Events

On April 26, 2017, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.08 per share on the Company’s common stock, payable on May 24, 2017 to shareholders of record as of May 11, 2017. Lake Shore, MHC (the “MHC”), which holds 3,636,875 shares, or approximately 59.5% of the Company’s total outstanding stock, elected to waive its right to receive this cash dividend of approximately $291,000. On March 7, 2017, the MHC received the non-objection of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia to waive its right to receive dividends paid by the Company during the twelve months ending February 8, 2018, aggregating up to $0.32 per share. The MHC waived $291,000 of dividends during the three months ended March 31, 2017. Cumulatively, Lake Shore, MHC has waived approximately $8.5 million of cash dividends as of March 31, 2017. The dividends waived by Lake Shore, MHC are considered a restriction on the retained earnings of the Company.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements may be identified by words such as “believe,” “will,” “expect,” “project,” “may,” “could,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “targets” and similar expressions. These statements are based upon our current beliefs and expectations and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements as a result of numerous factors.

The following factors, including the factors set forth in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in our forward-looking statements:

general and local economic conditions;

changes in interest rates, deposit flows, demand for mortgages and other loans, real estate values and competition;

the ability of our customers to make loan payments;

our ability to continue to control costs and expenses;

changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines;

our success in managing the risks involved in our business;

inflation, and market and monetary fluctuations;

the impact of more stringent capital requirements being imposed by banking regulators;

changes in legislation or regulation, including the implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act; and

other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting our operations, pricing, products and services.

Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in any other public statements we make may differ from actual outcomes. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Consequently, no forward-looking statements can be guaranteed. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Overview

The following discussion and analysis is presented to assist in the understanding and evaluation of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations. It is intended to complement the unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and should be read in conjunction therewith. The detailed discussion focuses on our consolidated financial condition as of March 31, 2017 compared to the consolidated financial condition as of December 31, 2016 and the consolidated results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

Our results of operations depend primarily on our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income we earn on loans and investments and the interest expense we pay on deposits, borrowings and

other interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is affected by the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest rates we earn or pay on these balances.

Our operations are also affected by non-interest income, such as service charges and fees and gains and losses on the sales of securities and loans, our provision for loan losses and non-interest expenses which include salaries and employee benefits, occupancy and equipment costs, data processing, professional services, advertising and other general and administrative expenses.

Financial institutions like us, in general, are significantly affected by economic conditions, competition, and the monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government. Lending activities are influenced by the demand for and supply of housing, competition among lenders, interest rate conditions, and funds availability. Our operations and lending are principally concentrated in the Western New York area, and our operations and earnings are influenced by local economic conditions. Deposit balances and cost of funds are influenced by prevailing market rates on competing investments, customer preferences, and levels of personal income and savings in our primary market area. Operations are also significantly impacted by government policies and actions of regulatory authorities. Future changes in applicable law, regulations or government policies may materially impact the Company.

To operate successfully, we must manage various types of risk, including but not limited to, interest rate risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, operational and information technology risks, strategic risk, reputation risk and compliance risk. While all of these risks are important, the risks of greatest significance to us are interest rate risk and credit risk.

Interest rate risk is the exposure of our net interest income to adverse movements in interest rates. Since net interest income (the difference between interest earned on loans and investments and interest paid on deposits and borrowings) is our primary source of revenue, interest rate risk is the most significant non-credit related risk to which our Company is exposed. Net interest income is affected by changes in interest rates as well as fluctuations in the level and duration of our assets and liabilities. In addition to directly impacting net interest income, changes in interest rates can also affect the amount of new loan originations, the ability of borrowers and debt issuers to repay loans and debt securities, the volume of loan repayments and refinancings, the flow and mix of deposits and the fair value of available for sale securities.

Credit risk is the risk to our earnings and stockholders’ equity that results from customers, to whom loans have been made, and from issuers of debt securities in which the Company has invested, failing to repay their obligations. The magnitude of risk depends on the capacity and willingness of borrowers and debt issuers to repay and the sufficiency of the value of collateral obtained to secure the loans made or investments purchased.

The Company uses the current statutory U.S corporate income tax rate of 34.0% to value its deferred tax assets and liabilities. On April 26, 2017, the Trump Administration announced a comprehensive tax reform proposal that includes a reduction in the U.S. corporate income tax rate to 15.0%. If corporate tax rates were reduced, management expects the Company would be required to record an initial charge against earnings to lower the carrying amount of its net deferred tax asset, and then, going forward, would record lower tax provisions on an ongoing basis. The proposal is at the beginning stages of negotiations and will need to be addressed by both houses of Congress. It is too early in the process to determine if any of the proposals are actionable. Accordingly, management cannot assess the effect a change in the corporate tax rate would have on Company’s operating results or financial position at the present time.

Management Strategy

There have been no material changes in the Company’s management strategy from what was disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Critical Accounting Policies

Disclosure of the Company’s significant accounting policies is included in the notes to the consolidated financial statements of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Some of these policies require significant judgment, estimates and assumptions to be made by management, most particularly in connection with determining the provision for loan losses and the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses, as well as management’s evaluation of securities valuation, impairment of securities and income taxes. There have been no changes in critical accounting policies since December 31, 2016.

Analysis of Net Interest Income

Net interest income represents the difference between the interest we earn on our interest-earning assets, such as commercial and residential mortgage loans and investment securities, and the expense we pay on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. Net interest income depends on both the volume of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest rates we earn or pay on them.

Average Balances, Interest and Average Yields. The following table sets forth certain information relating to our average balance sheets and reflects the average yield on interest-earning assets and average cost of interest-bearing liabilities, interest earned and interest paid for the periods indicated. Such yields and costs are derived by dividing interest income or expense by the average balance of interest-earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities, respectively, for the periods indicated. Average balances are derived from daily balances over the periods indicated. The average balances for loans are net of allowance for loan losses, but include non-accrual loans. Interest income on securities does not include a tax equivalent adjustment for bank qualified municipal bonds.


	For the Three Months Ended					For the Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017					March 31, 2016
	Average		Interest Income/		Yield/	Average		Interest Income/		Yield/
	Balance		Expense		Rate	Balance		Expense		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-earning deposits & federal funds sold	$	29,581	$	38	0.51%	$	27,187	$	16	0.24%
Securities(1)		86,516		658	3.04%		111,950		834	2.98%
Loans		335,166		4,062	4.85%		301,383		3,514	4.66%
Total interest-earning assets		451,263		4,758	4.22%		440,520		4,364	3.96%
Other assets		36,788					34,472
Total assets	$	488,051				$	474,992

Interest-bearing liabilities
Demand & NOW accounts	$	51,411	$	16	0.12%	$	43,331	$	8	0.07%
Money market accounts		80,145		52	0.26%		78,251		34	0.17%
Savings accounts		53,140		8	0.06%		45,488		6	0.05%
Time deposits		147,763		401	1.09%		157,706		420	1.07%
Borrowed funds		18,950		92	1.94%		20,231		96	1.90%
Other interest-bearing liabilities		916		21	9.17%		990		23	9.29%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		352,325		590	0.67%		345,997		587	0.68%
Other non-interest bearing liabilities		58,933					53,851
Stockholders' equity		76,793					75,144
Total liabilities & stockholders' equity	$	488,051				$	474,992
Net interest income			$	4,168				$	3,777
Interest rate spread					3.55%					3.28%
Net interest margin					3.69%					3.43%

⁽¹⁾

The tax equivalent adjustment for bank qualified municipals results in rates of 4.11% and 3.81% for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Rate Volume Analysis. The following table analyzes the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for major components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The table shows the amount of the change in interest income or expense caused by either changes in outstanding balances (volume) or changes in interest rates. The effect of a change in volume is measured by applying the average rate during the first period to the volume change between the two periods. The effect of changes in rate is measured by applying the change in rate between the two periods to the average volume during the first period. Changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately to the absolute value of the change due to volume and the change due to rate.


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
	Compared to
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
	Rate		Volume		Net Change
		(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-earning deposits & federal funds sold	$	20	$	2	$	22
Securities		17		(193)		(176)
Loans, including fees		143		405		548
Total interest-earning assets		180		214		394
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand & NOW accounts		6		2		8
Money market accounts		17		1		18
Savings accounts		1		1		2
Time deposits		8		(27)		(19)
Total deposits		32		(23)		9
Other interest-bearing liabilities:
Borrowed funds & other		2		(8)		(6)
Total interest-bearing liabilities		34		(31)		3
Total change in net interest income	$	146	$	245	$	391

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the average yields on interest-earning assets increased 26 basis points to 4.22% primarily due to a 19 basis points increase in the average yield earned on loans. The 19 basis points increase in the average yield on the loan portfolio was primarily due to a $33.8 million, or 11.2%, increase in the average loan portfolio since March 31, 2016. The increase in the average balance of the loan portfolio was primarily due to an increase in the average balance of higher yielding commercial real estate and commercial business loans. The increased average yield was also due to the receipt of $202,000 of interest income on one non-performing commercial real estate loan which paid off during the first quarter of 2017. In the current extended low interest-rate environment, our cost of funds has remained stable due to a shift in our deposit mix from time deposits to low cost core deposits. The average balance of lower cost core deposits increased $17.6 million, or 10.6%, during the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the prior year’s quarter. In addition the average balance of time deposits decreased by $9.9 million, or 6.3%, during the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the prior year’s quarter. The net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was 3.69% in comparison to a net interest margin of 3.43% for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The interest rate spread for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was 3.55% in comparison to an interest rate spread of 3.28% for the three months ended March 31, 2016.The Bank’s Asset-Liability Committee continues to evaluate the options available to minimize the potential impact of a rising rate environment on its operations, as well as to prepare for the impact of a continued, prolonged, low-interest rate environment. The Committee and Bank management have implemented strategies to shorten the term of interest-earning assets and increase investments in liquid assets to position the Bank to be able to take advantage of rising interest rates in the future. Furthermore, strategies to increase core deposits and the

origination of adjustable-rate commercial loans are also in place to manage interest rate risk and the net interest margin.

Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016

Total assets at March 31, 2017 were $493.9 million, an increase of $4.7 million, or 1.0%, from $489.2 million at December 31, 2016. The increase in total assets was primarily due to an $18.7 million increase in loans receivable partially offset by an $11.6 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents and a $2.7 million decrease in securities available for sale.

Cash and cash equivalents decreased by $11.6 million, or 25.5%, from $45.5 million at December 31, 2016 to $33.9 million at March 31, 2017. The decrease was primarily due to a $19.1 million net cash outflow for loan originations during 2017, partially offset by a net $2.6 million cash inflow from the receipt of principal paydowns, sales and maturities on the investment portfolio and a $4.9 million increase in deposits.

Securities available for sale decreased by $2.7 million, or 3.1%, to $83.6 million at March 31, 2017 compared to $86.3 million at December 31, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to the receipt of $2.3 million in principal paydowns and $736,000 in proceeds from the sale of investments, partially offset by $399,000 of new securities purchased during the three months ended March 31, 2017.

Net loans receivable increased during the three months ended March 31, 2017 as shown in the table below:


	At March 31,		At December 31,		Change
	2017		2016		$		%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real Estate Loans:
Residential, one- to four-family	$	147,864	$	149,333	$	(1,469)	(1.0)	%
Home equity		35,978		35,534		444	1.2	%
Commercial		117,702		107,243		10,459	9.8	%
Construction		18,014		12,361		5,653	45.7	%
Total real estate loans		319,558		304,471		15,087	5.0	%
Other Loans:
Commercial		24,408		20,447		3,961	19.4	%
Consumer		1,267		1,313		(46)	(3.5)	%
Total gross loans		345,233		326,231		19,002	5.8	%
Allowance for loan losses		(3,198)		(2,882)		(316)	11.0	%
Net deferred loan costs		2,997		3,016		(19)	(0.6)	%
Loans receivable, net	$	345,032	$	326,365	$	18,667	5.7	%

The increase in net loans receivable was primarily due to an increase in commercial real estate loans, construction loans, commercial business loans, and home equity loans, partially offset by a decrease in residential, one- to four-family real estate loans. As fixed rate one- to four-family residential real estate loans present additional interest rate risk to our loan portfolio as a result of the longer duration of these types of assets, we remain strategically focused in 2017 on originating shorter duration commercial real estate and commercial business loans to diversify our asset mix, to reduce interest rate risk, to take advantage of the opportunities available to serve small businesses in our market area, and to increase our net interest margin.

Loans Past Due and Non-performing Assets. The following table presents information regarding our non-accrual loans, accruing loans delinquent 90 days or more, non-performing loans, foreclosed real estate, and non-performing and performing loans classified as troubled debt restructurings, as of the dates indicated.


	At March 31,			At December 31,
	2017			2016
	(Dollars in thousands)
Loans past due 90 days or more but still accruing:
Real estate loans:
Residential, one- to four-family	$	-		$	136
Home equity		-			24
Commercial		-			-
Construction		-			-
Other loans:
Commercial		-			2
Consumer		-			-
Total	$	-		$	162
Loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis:
Real estate loans:
Residential, one- to four-family	$	2,205		$	2,165
Home equity		335			329
Commercial		1,725			2,977
Construction		-			-
Other loans:
Commercial		159			205
Consumer		21			28
Total non-accrual loans		4,445			5,704
Total non-performing loans		4,445			5,866
Foreclosed real estate		408			412
Total non-performing assets	$	4,853		$	6,278
Ratios:
Non-performing loans as a percent of total loans:		1.29	%		1.80	%
Non-performing assets as a percent of total assets:		0.98	%		1.28	%
Troubled debt restructuring:
Loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis
Real estate loans:
Home equity	$	19		$	19
Other loans:
Commercial	$	105		$	109
Performing loans
Real estate loans:
Residential, one- to four-family	$	189		$	190
Home equity		3			3

Total non-performing loans decreased by $1.4 million, or 24.2%, to $4.4 million at March 31, 2017 from $5.9 million at December 31, 2016, primarily due to a $1.3 million decrease in non-performing commercial real estate loans. The decrease in non-performing commercial real estate loans was primarily due to the payoff of

one commercial real estate loan, with a loan balance of $1.2 million as of December 31, 2016. Management is actively pursuing all actions necessary to collect the outstanding balance on all non-performing loans, which may include foreclosure on the related properties.

The following table sets forth activity in our allowance for loan losses and other ratios at or for the dates indicated.


	At or for the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	2,882	$	1,985
Provision for loan losses		350		130
Charge-offs:
Real estate loans:
Residential, one- to four-family		-		(49)
Home equity		-		(3)
Commercial		-		-
Construction		-		-
Other loans:
Commercial		(16)		(4)
Consumer		(24)		(11)
Total charge-offs		(40)		(67)
Recoveries:
Real estate loans:
Residential, one- to four-family		1		1
Home equity		-		-
Commercial		-		-
Construction		-		-
Other loans:
Commercial		1		-
Consumer		4		3
Total recoveries		6		4
Net charge-offs		(34)		(63)
Balance at end of period	$	3,198	$	2,052
Average loans outstanding	$	335,166	$	301,383
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of total net loans		0.93%		0.68%
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of non-performing loans		71.95%		42.10%
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding(1)		0.04%		0.08%

(1) Annualized

The table below shows changes in deposit balances by type of deposit account between March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:


	At March 31,		At December 31,		Change
	2017		2016		$		%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Demand deposits and NOW accounts:
Non-interest bearing	$	52,690	$	55,889	$	(3,199)	(5.7)	%
Interest bearing		52,774		52,058		716	1.4	%
Money market		81,236		78,401		2,835	3.6	%
Savings		54,454		52,404		2,050	3.9	%
Time deposits		149,656		147,141		2,515	1.7	%
Total deposits	$	390,810	$	385,893	$	4,917	1.3	%

The increase in total deposits was due to net growth in core deposits and an increase in time deposits. The net growth in core deposits was the result of the Company’s continued strategic focus on growing low-cost core deposits among its retail and commercial customers in an effort to manage interest expense. Time deposits increased primarily due to the development of new customer deposit relationships during the first quarter of 2017.

Total stockholders’ equity increased by $571,000, or 0.8%, from $76.0 million at December 31, 2016 to $76.6 million at March 31, 2017. The increase in stockholders’ equity was primarily due to net income of $716,000 partially offset by $186,000 in cash dividends paid.

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016

General. Net income was $716,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017, or $0.12 per diluted share, a decrease of $1.2 million, or 63.4%, compared to net income of $2.0 million, or $0.33 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The decrease in net income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was primarily due to a $1.6 million net decrease in pre-tax gains on the sale of securities, a $220,000 increase in provision for loan losses and a $175,000 increase in non-interest expense which was partially offset by a $391,000 increase in net interest income and a $346,000 decrease in income tax expense when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016.

Interest Income. Interest income increased by $394,000, or 9.0%, to $4.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 primarily due to an increase in loan interest income. Loan interest income increased by $548,000, or 15.6%, to $4.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016, primarily due to an increase in the average balance of the loan portfolio by $33.8 million, or 11.2%, from $301.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 to $335.2 million for the three months end March 31, 2017. The increase in the average balance of loans was primarily due to an increase in the average balance of commercial real estate and commercial business loans. The increase in interest income on loans was also due to the receipt of $202,000 of interest income on one non-performing commercial real estate loan which paid off during the three months ended March 31, 2017. This caused the average yield on the loan portfolio to increase from 4.66% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 to 4.85% for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The average yield on the loan portfolio would have been 4.61% for the three months ended March 31, 2017 when excluding the impact of the $202,000 of interest income received on the non-performing loan payoff.

Investment interest income decreased $176,000, or 21.1%, to $658,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016, primarily due to a decrease in the average balance of the investment portfolio from $112.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 to $86.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The decrease in the average balance of the investment portfolio was primarily due to the Company’s strategy to sell $14.1 million of treasury bonds during the first quarter of 2016 and to reinvest the sales proceeds, as well as paydowns received on the securities portfolio, into loan

originations, primarily commercial loans. The purpose of this strategy is to shorten the duration of interest earning assets in order to be in a better position to take advantage of future increases in market interest rates as well as to manage interest rate risk. The average yield on the investment portfolio increased six basis points from 2.98% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 to 3.04% for the three months ended March 31, 2017.

Other interest income increased by $22,000, or 137.5%, to $38,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016, primarily due to a 27 basis points increase in the average yield on the interest-earning deposits and federal funds sold portfolio. The average yield increased from 0.24% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 to 0.51% for the three months ended March 31, 2017. This increase in average yield was primarily due to a 25 basis points increase in the fed funds rate during both the fourth quarter of 2016 and the first quarter of 2017. The average balance of the interest-earning deposits and federal funds sold portfolio increased by $2.4 million, or 8.8%, from $27.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 to $29.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The increase was primarily due to the receipt of proceeds from paydowns and sales from the securities portfolio that were reinvested into shorter term cash and cash equivalents in order to be in a better position to take advantage of future increases in market interest rates and to fund loan originations.

Interest Expense. Interest expense remained stable at $590,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to $587,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016. Interest paid on deposits increased by $9,000, or 1.9%, to $477,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016, primarily due to a $7.7 million increase in the average balance of deposits for the three month period ended March 31, 2017 when compared to the same period in the prior year The growth in the average balance of deposits was primarily due to an increase in low-cost core deposits. Interest expense related to advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLBNY”) decreased $4,000, or 4.2%, to $92,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 as a result of a $1.2 million decrease in the average balance of FHLBNY advances. The average balance of advances was $19.0 million with an average rate of 1.94% for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to an average balance of $20.2 million and an average rate of 1.90% for the same period in the prior year.

Provision for Loan Losses. A provision of $350,000 to the allowance for loan losses was recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2017, which was a $220,000 increase in comparison to the provision recorded during the same period in the prior year primarily related to reserves set aside on commercial loans.

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company recorded a $165,000 provision for commercial real estate loans. $186,000 of this provision was attributed to the downgrade of two performing commercial loan relationships which totaled $1.3 million with a loan to value ratio of 49.7% and 64.0%, respectively, from a special mention to substandard reserve pool. In addition, a $155,000 provision was recorded to appropriately reflect risk associated with commercial portfolio growth. The commercial real estate loan portfolio increased by $10.5 million, or 9.8%, since December 31, 2016. The provision was partially offset by a $176,000 credit related to changes in qualitative factors on commercial real estate loans to reflect changes in related environmental factors used to qualitatively assess inherent loan losses.

The Company recorded a $103,000 general allowance during the three months ended March 31, 2017 on performing construction and commercial business loans, primarily due to a $9.2 million, or 28.6%, increase in the construction and commercial business loan portfolios since December 31, 2016, to reflect inherent losses within the portfolios. In addition, a $23,000 provision was recorded to reflect the downgrade in loan classification for one commercial relationship for $265,000, which is collateralized by manufacturing equipment and other business assets, during the first quarter of 2017.

A $42,000 provision was recorded by the Company during the three months ended March 31, 2017 for one-to four-family, home equity and consumer loans to reflect an increase in the historical average net charge-offs for these loans types over the last five years and due to net charge-offs during the three months ended March 31, 2017.

The Company recorded an unallocated credit to the provision for loan losses of $40,000, to reflect the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating allocated and general losses in the portfolio.

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company recorded an $183,000 provision for one- to four-family, home equity and consumer loans primarily due to a review of the historical losses relating to these types of loans. The Company set aside $76,000 of provision to reflect an increase in historical average net charge-offs for these loans types over the last five years. A provision of $107,000 was set aside for one- to four-family, home equity, and consumer loans due to changes in the related environmental factors used to qualitatively assess inherent losses in the loan portfolio and due to an increase in net charge-offs during the three months ended March 31, 2016. The Company recorded a $72,000 provision on construction and commercial loans primarily due to an increase in loan balances during the three months ended March 31, 2016, to reflect the inherent losses expected on these loan types. The Company recorded a $180,000 credit provision on commercial real estate loans primarily due to a decrease in historical average net charge-offs over the last five years. The credit provision for commercial real estate loans was partially offset by a $71,000 provision for loan losses to reflect inherent losses included in new commercial real estate loans originated during the three months ended March 31, 2016. The Company recorded an unallocated credit to the provision for loan losses of $16,000, to reflect the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating allocated and general losses in the portfolio.

Refer to Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details on the provision for loan losses.

Non-interest Income. Non-interest income decreased $1.6 million, or 71.5%, to $630,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to a $1.6 million pre-tax realized gain on the sale of securities during the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to a $25,000 pre-tax realized gain on the sale of securities during the three months ended March 31, 2017. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in earnings on bank owned life insurance and service charges and fees. Earnings on bank owned life insurance increased by $20,000, or 29.9%, during the three months ended March 31, 2017 due to the purchase of an additional $2.5 million in insurance during the fourth quarter of 2016. Service charges and fees increased by $13,000, or 3.0%, during the three months ended March 31, 2017 when compared to same period in 2016, due to increased growth in core deposits and new product offerings.

Non-interest Expenses. Non-interest expenses increased $175,000, or 5.1%, from $3.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 to $3.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017. Salaries and employee benefits increased $100,000, or 5.6%, primarily due to annual salary increases and grants of stock awards, partially offset by lower health insurance costs. Advertising expense increased by $54,000, or 47.8%, which was primarily due to development of a new marketing campaign associated with current deposit and loan promotions. Data processing expenses increased $42,000, or 15.9%, due to implementation of new technology and growth in deposit and loan accounts. Decreases in professional service fees and FDIC insurance expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2017 were partially offset by increases in occupancy expenses and other expenses when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016.

Income Taxes Expense. Income tax expense decreased by $346,000, or 69.1%, from $501,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 to $155,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The decrease in income tax expense was primarily due to a decrease in pre-tax income during the three months ended March 31, 2017. The effective tax rate was 17.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to an effective rate of 20.4% for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The decrease in the 2017 effective tax rate was primarily due to the projected mix of tax-exempt income derived from our municipal bond portfolio and bank-owned life insurance in relation to our projection of pre-tax income for the current year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity describes our ability to meet the financial obligations that arise during the ordinary course of business. Liquidity is primarily needed to fund loan commitments, to pay the deposit withdrawal requirements of our customers as well as to fund current and planned expenditures. Our primary sources of funds consist of deposits, fed funds balances, scheduled amortization and prepayments of loans and securities, maturities and sales of investments and loans, interest earning deposits at other financial institutions and funds provided from operations. We have written agreements with the FHLBNY, which allows us to borrow the maximum lending values designated by the type of collateral pledged. As of March 31, 2017, our maximum lending value was $107.0 million and was collateralized by a pledge of certain fixed-rate residential, one- to four-family loans. At March 31, 2017, we had outstanding advances under this agreement of $19.0 million. We have a written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank discount window for overnight borrowings which is collateralized by a pledge of our securities, and allows us to borrow up to the value of the securities pledged, which was equal to a book value of $11.1 million and a fair value of $11.5 million as of March 31, 2017. There were no balances outstanding with the Federal Reserve Bank at March 31, 2017. We have also established lines of credits with correspondent banks for $22.0 million, of which $20.0 million is unsecured and the remaining $2.0 million will be secured by a pledge of our securities when a draw is made. There were no borrowings on these lines as of March 31, 2017.

Historically, loan repayments and maturing investment securities were a relatively predictable source of funds. However, in light of the current economic environment, there are now more risks related to loan repayments and the valuation and maturity of investment securities. In addition, deposit flows, calls of investment securities, and prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities are strongly influenced by interest rates, general and local economic conditions, and competition in the marketplace. These factors and the current economic environment reduce the predictability of the timing of these sources of funds. To the extent possible, the Bank manages the cash flows of its loan and deposit portfolios by the rates it offers customers.

Our primary investing activities include the origination of loans and the purchase of investment securities. For the three months ended March 31, 2017, we originated loans of approximately $38.4 million in comparison to approximately $18.6 million of loans originated during the three months ended March 31, 2016. Loan originations exceeded principal repayments and other deductions in the first three months of 2017 by $19.1 million. The loan originations were funded through principal payments received on loans and securities, proceeds from the sale of securities, customer deposits, borrowings and cash reserves. Purchases of investment securities totaled $399,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2017. We did not purchase any investment securities during the three months ended March 31, 2016.

At March 31, 2017, we had loan commitments to borrowers of approximately $14.0 million and overdraft lines of protection, unused home equity lines of credit and unused commercial lines of credit of approximately $33.2 million. Total deposits were $390.8 million at March 31, 2017, as compared to $385.9 million at December 31, 2016. The increase in total deposits was primarily due to net growth in low-cost core deposits and time deposits during the first three months of 2017. The Company’s strategic focus is on growing low-cost core deposits among its retail and commercial customers in an effort to manage interest expenses. Time deposit accounts scheduled to mature within one year were $64.5 million at March 31, 2017. Based on our deposit retention experience, current pricing strategy, and competitive pricing policies, we anticipate that a significant portion of these time deposits will remain with us following their maturity.

We are committed to maintaining a strong liquidity position; therefore, we monitor our liquidity position on a daily basis. We anticipate that we will have sufficient funds to meet our current funding commitments. The marginal cost of new funding, however, whether from deposits or borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank, will be carefully considered as we monitor our liquidity needs. Therefore, in order to minimize our cost of funds, we may consider additional borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank in the future.

We do not anticipate any material capital expenditures in 2017, other than the $1.3 million capital project noted in the “Capital Expenditures” section below. We do not have any balloon or other payments due on any long-term obligations or any off-balance sheet items other than loan commitments as described in Note 6 in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements and the borrowing agreements noted above.

Capital Expenditures

Significant planned expenditures for 2017 include the purchase of the Orchard Park branch office, which is currently under a capital lease agreement that expires in 2017. The Company also plans to build an addition to the Orchard Park branch for its Commercial Lending division, which will include office space for commercial loan officers and administrative staff. The Company believes it has a sufficient capital base to support this capital project, which is expected to cost approximately $1.3 million.

Capital

As of January 1, 2015, new regulations that substantially amended the bank capital requirements became applicable to us. These regulations implement the Basel III regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act, as discussed in the “Supervision and Regulation – Federal Banking Regulation – Capital Requirements” section included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

As of March 31, 2017, as shown in the table below, the Bank’s Tier 1 and risk-based capital levels exceeded levels necessary to be considered “Well Capitalized” under Prompt Corrective Action provisions, as determined by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”), our primary regulator.

The Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios and those required by the regulatory standards in effect as of the dates presented are as follows:


At March 31, 2017	Actual Ratio		Minimum For Capital Adequacy Purposes			To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
Common Equity Tier 1 ("CET1") capital (to risk-weighted assets)	21.55	%	>=	4.50	%	>=	6.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	21.55	%	>=	6.00	%	>=	8.00	%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	22.52	%	>=	8.00	%	>=	10.00	%
Tier 1 Leverage (to adjusted total assets)	14.62	%	>=	4.00	%	>=	5.00	%
At December 31, 2016	Actual Ratio		Minimum For Capital Adequacy Purposes			To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
CET 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	22.23	%	>=	4.50	%	>=	6.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	22.23	%	>=	6.00	%	>=	8.00	%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	23.15	%	>=	8.00	%	>=	10.00	%
Tier 1 Leverage (to adjusted total assets)	14.73	%	>=	4.00	%	>=	5.00	%

In order to avoid limitations on distributions, including dividend payments, and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers, an institution must hold a capital conservation buffer above its minimum risk-based capital requirements. As of March 31, 2017, the Bank's capital conservation buffer was 14.52% exceeding the minimum of 1.25% for 2017.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Other than loan commitments, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that is material to investors. Refer to Note 6 in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a summary of loan commitments outstanding as of March 31, 2017.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable as the Company is a smaller reporting company.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the quarter ended March 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes in the Company’s risk factors from those disclosed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table reports information regarding repurchases by Lake Shore Bancorp of its common stock in each month of the quarter ended March 31, 2017:

COMPANY PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES



Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share	Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1)

January 1 through January 31, 2017	-	$	-	-	84,501
February 1 through February 28, 2017	-		-	-	84,501
March 1 through March 31, 2017	-		-	-	84,501
Total	-	$	-	-	84,501

______________

⁽¹⁾

On December 11, 2015, our Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase plan pursuant to which we can repurchase up to 117,701 shares of our outstanding common stock. This amount represents approximately 5% of our outstanding common stock not owned by the MHC as of December 11, 2015. The repurchase plan does not have an expiration date and superseded all of the prior stock repurchase programs.

Item 6. Exhibits



			31.1				Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
			31.2				Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002*
			32.1				Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
			32.2				Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
			101.INS				XBRL Instance Document*
			101.SCH				XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*
			101.CAL				XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document*
			101.DEF				XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document*
			101.LAB				XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document*
			101.PRE				XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document*

________________

*Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


		LAKE SHORE BANCORP, INC.
		(Registrant)

May 12, 2017	By:	/s/ Daniel P. Reininga
		Daniel P. Reininga
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

May 12, 2017	By:	/s/ Rachel A. Foley
		Rachel A. Foley
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

LAKE SHORE BANCORP, INC. Reports