UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2017

OR

[  ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________ to __________

Commission file number 000-54957

OWENS REALTY MORTGAGE, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 (Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes [   ] No [X]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited):
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016	4
	Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016	5
	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016	6
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016	7
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	8
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	29
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	44
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	46

 

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	46
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	46
Item 6.	Exhibits	46

 

OWENS REALTY MORTGAGE, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 (UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

OWENS REALTY MORTGAGE, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Income

 (UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

OWENS REALTY MORTGAGE, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity

Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016

 (UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

OWENS REALTY MORTGAGE, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 (UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Owens Realty Mortgage, Inc. (the "Company") was incorporated on August 9, 2012, under the laws of the State of Maryland. The Company is authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of its $0.01 par value common stock ("Common Stock"). In addition, the Company is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock at $0.01 par value per share. The Company was created to effect the merger (the "Merger") of Owens Mortgage Investment Fund, a California Limited Partnership ("OMIF") with and into the Company as described in the Registration Statement on Form S-4, as amended, of the Company, declared effective on February 12, 2013 (File No. 333-184392).  The Merger was part of a plan to reorganize the business operations of OMIF so that it could elect to qualify as a real estate investment trust for Federal income tax purposes. The Merger was approved by OMIF limited partners on April 16, 2013 and was completed on May 20, 2013.

The Company has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), commencing with the Company's taxable year ended December 31, 2012. As a REIT, the Company is permitted to deduct distributions made to its stockholders, allowing its operating income represented by such distributions to avoid taxation at the entity level and to be taxed generally only at the stockholder level. The Company currently intends to distribute substantially all of its REIT taxable income, excluding net capital gains. As a REIT, however, the Company is subject to separate, corporate-level tax, including potential 100% penalty taxes under various circumstances, as well as certain state and local taxes. In addition, the Company's taxable REIT subsidiaries are subject to full corporate income tax. Furthermore, the Company's ability to continue to qualify as a REIT will depend upon its continuing satisfaction of various requirements, such as those related to the diversity of its stock ownership, the nature of its assets, the sources of its income and the distributions to its stockholders, including a requirement that the Company distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of its REIT taxable income on an annual basis (determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and by excluding net capital gain).

In the opinion of the management of the Company, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal, recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial information included therein. Certain information and footnote disclosures presented in the annual consolidated financial statements are not included in these interim financial statements.  These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Form 10-K of ORM for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on March 15, 2017. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2017. The Company evaluates subsequent events up to the date it files its Form 10-Q with the SEC. 

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiaries ("TRSs") and its majority- and wholly-owned limited liability companies. The Company is in the business of providing mortgage lending services and manages its business as one operating segment. Due to foreclosure activity, the Company also owns and manages real estate assets.

Certain reclassifications, not affecting previously reported net income or stockholders' equity, have been made to the previously issued consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period presentation.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Such estimates are inherently imprecise and actual results could differ significantly from such estimates.

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2017-01, "Business Combinations (Topic 805) – Clarifying the Definition of a Business", or ASU 2017-01. The amendments in ASU 2017-01 clarify the definition of a business by more clearly outlining the requirements for an integrated set of assets and activities to be considered a business and by establishing a practical framework to determine when the integrated set of assets and activities is a business. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted for transactions not yet reflected in the financial statements. The Company does not believe that adoption of ASU 2017-01 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) – Restricted Cash", or ASU 2016-18. The amendments in ASU 2016-18 require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash and cash equivalents together when reconciling the beginning and end of period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted and requires adoption on a retrospective basis to each period presented. The adoption of ASU 2016-18 will result in the Company including its restricted cash with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning and ending amounts shown on its consolidated statement of cash flows.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) – Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments", or ASU 2016-15. The amendments in ASU 2016-15 reflect eight targeted changes to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted and requires adoption on a retrospective basis to each period presented, unless it is impracticable to apply, in which case, the amendment is required to be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. Presently, the Company believes that the only impact from the adoption of ASU 2016-15 will be that distributions it receives from its equity method investment will be reported in cash flows from operating activities rather than financing activities on its consolidated statement of cash flows.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, "Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) – Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments", or ASU 2016-13. The amendments in ASU 2016-13 eliminate the probable and incurred credit loss recognition threshold in current GAAP and, instead, reflect an entity's current estimate of all expected credit losses. The amendments in ASU 2016-13 broaden the information that an entity must consider in developing its expected credit loss estimate for assets measured either collectively or individually. The use of forecasted information incorporates more timely information in the estimate of expected credit loss. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for interim and annual reporting beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2016-13 may have on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)," or ASU 2014-09. ASU 2014-09 broadly amends the accounting guidance for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09's effective date was deferred one year by ASU 2015-14, and it is now effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2017, and is to be applied retrospectively to all periods presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized at the date of the initial application. Early adoption is permitted, but not before annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company expects that the majority of its revenue will not be impacted by the adoption of this accounting standard since the standard will not change its accounting policy for the recognition of interest income. The Company does not anticipate its revenue from real estate properties will be significantly impacted by this standard, however management is still evaluating the standard's impact as it relates to rental income and gain on sale of real estate when such sale is financed by the Company.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)" or ASU 2016-02.  ASU 2016-02 amends existing guidance related to leases, primarily by requiring the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under the current accounting guidance. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted.  The Company does not believe that adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Financial Instruments- Overall (Subtopic 825-10) – Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities", or ASU 2016-1.  ASU 2016-01 amends existing guidance related to the disclosure, presentation, recognition and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities.  This accounting standard primarily amends the accounting for certain equity investments, fair value disclosures and presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting beginning after December 15, 2017, with certain aspects available for early adoption.  The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU 2016-01 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-07, "Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323) – Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting", or ASU 2016-07. To simplify the accounting for equity method investments, the amendments in ASU 2016-07 eliminate the requirement in Topic 323 that an entity retroactively adopt the equity method of accounting if an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership or degree of influence. The amendments require that the equity method investor add the cost of acquiring the additional interest in the investee to the current basis of the investor's previously held interest and adopt the equity method of accounting as of the date the investment becomes qualified for equity method accounting. The adoption of ASU 2016-07 during the first quarter of 2017 did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Significant Accounting Policies

Loans are generally stated at the principal amount outstanding. Advances under the terms of a loan to pay property taxes, insurance, legal and other costs are generally capitalized and reported as interest and other receivables. The Company's portfolio consists primarily of real estate loans generally collateralized by first, second and third deeds of trust.  Interest income on loans is accrued by the simple interest method. A loan is generally placed on nonaccrual status when the loan becomes greater than ninety days delinquent in monthly payments and/or full payment of principal and interest is not expected. When a loan is classified as nonaccrual, interest accruals discontinue and all past due interest is included in the recorded investment in the impaired loan that is measured as described below. Interest accruals are resumed on such loans only when they are brought fully current with respect to interest and principal and when, in the judgment of management, the loans are estimated to be fully collectible as to both principal and interest. Cash receipts on nonaccrual loans are used to reduce any outstanding accrued interest, and then are recorded as interest income, except when such payments are specifically designated as principal reduction or when management does not believe the Company's investment in the loan is fully recoverable. The Company does not incur origination costs and does not earn or collect origination fees from borrowers as OFG is entitled to all such fees (see Note 9).

Loans and the related accrued interest and advances are analyzed by management on a periodic basis for ultimate recovery. The allowance for loan losses is management's estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the Company's loan portfolio that have been incurred as of the balance sheet date.  The allowance is established through a provision for loan losses which is charged to expense.  Additions to the allowance are expected to maintain the adequacy of the total allowance after credit losses and loan growth.  Credit exposures determined to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance.  Cash received on previously charged off amounts is recorded as a recovery to the allowance.  The overall allowance consists of two primary components: specific reserves related to impaired loans that are individually evaluated for impairment and general reserves for inherent losses related to loans that are not considered impaired and are collectively evaluated for impairment.

Regardless of a loan type, a loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, management believes it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due, including principal and interest, according to the contractual terms of the original agreement. All loans determined to be impaired are individually evaluated for impairment.  When a loan is considered impaired, management estimates impairment based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, except that as a practical expedient, management may measure impairment based on a loan's observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.  A loan is collateral dependent if the repayment of the loan is expected to be provided solely by the underlying collateral. These valuations are generally updated during the fourth quarter but may be updated during interim periods if deemed appropriate by management.

A restructuring of a debt constitutes a troubled debt restructuring ("TDR") if the Company for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor's financial difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider.  Restructured loans typically present an elevated level of credit risk as the borrowers are not able to perform according to the original contractual terms.  Loans that are reported as TDR's are considered impaired and measured for impairment as described above.

The determination of the general reserve for loans that are not considered impaired and are collectively evaluated for impairment is based on estimates made by management, to include, but not limited to, consideration of historical losses by portfolio segment, internal asset classifications, and qualitative factors to include economic trends in the Company's service areas, industry experience and trends, geographic concentrations, estimated collateral values, the Company's underwriting policies, the character of the loan portfolio, and probable losses inherent in the portfolio taken as a whole.

The Company maintains a separate allowance for each portfolio segment (loan type).  These portfolio segments include commercial real estate, residential real estate and land loans.   The allowance for loan losses attributable to each portfolio segment, which includes both impaired loans that are individually evaluated for impairment and loans that are not considered impaired and are collectively evaluated for impairment, is combined to determine the Company's overall allowance, which is included on the consolidated balance sheet. The reserve for loans that are not considered impaired consists of reserve factors that are based on management's assessment of the following for each portfolio segment: (1) inherent credit risk, (2) historical losses, and (3) other qualitative factors.  These reserve factors are inherently subjective and are driven by the repayment risk associated with each portfolio segment described below.

Land Loans – These loans generally possess a higher inherent risk of loss than other real estate portfolio segments.  A major risk arises from the necessity to complete the projects within the specified costs and time lines. Trends in the construction industry significantly impact the credit quality of these loans as demand drives construction activity. In addition, trends in real estate values significantly impact the credit quality of these loans, as property values generally determine the economic viability of construction projects.

Commercial and Residential Real Estate Loans –Adverse economic developments or an overbuilt market impact commercial and residential real estate projects and may result in troubled loans.  Trends in vacancy rates of properties impact the credit quality of these loans.  High vacancy rates reduce operating revenues and the ability for properties to produce sufficient cash flow to service debt obligations.

Management monitors the credit quality of the Company's loan portfolio on an ongoing basis using certain credit quality indicators including a loan's delinquency status and internal asset classification. A loan is considered classified when it meets the definition of impaired as described above.

The following tables show the changes in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 and the allocation of the allowance for loan losses and loans as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 by portfolio segment and by impairment methodology:

 

 

The following tables show an aging analysis of the loan portfolio by the time monthly payments are past due as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. All of the loans that were 90 or more days past due as listed below were on non-accrual status as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

The above table as of March 31, 2017 includes past maturity loans in the Current Loan category of approximately $5,227,000 ($1,175,000 Commercial which was greater than 90 days past maturity and $4,052,000 Residential of which $3,025,000 was greater than 90 days past maturity, $760,000 of which was 60-89 days past maturity and $267,000 of which was 30-59 days past maturity). These loans were current in making monthly interest payments and in the process of being extended, paid off or refinanced.

The above table as of December 31, 2016 includes past maturity loans in the Current Loan category of approximately $8,686,000 ($3,675,000 Commercial of which $2,500,000 was less than 30 days and $1,175,000 was 30-59 days past maturity and $5,011,000 Residential all of which was greater than 90 days past maturity). These loans were current in making monthly interest payments and in the process of being extended, paid off or refinanced.

The following tables show information related to impaired loans as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2017:

 

The following table shows information related to impaired loans as of December 31, 2016 and for the three months ended March 31, 2016:

The recorded investment balances presented in the above tables include amounts advanced in addition to principal on impaired loans (such as property taxes, insurance and legal charges) that are reimbursable by borrowers and are included in interest and other receivables in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Interest income recognized on a cash basis for impaired loans approximates the interest income recognized as reflected in the tables above. The average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans for which no related allowance was recorded presented in the above tables are disclosed as such, even if these impaired loans may have had an allowance recorded at some point during the year. In addition, the calculations of average recorded investment and interest income recognized in the above tables include loans that had been outstanding for some period of time during the year, but for which there was no recorded investment at the end of the year.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The Company had recorded specific loan loss allowances of approximately $625,000 and $733,000 on loans totaling approximately $4,668,000 and $5,374,000 (recorded investments before allowance for loan losses) to borrowers whose loan terms had been modified in troubled debt restructurings as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.  The Company has not committed to lend additional amounts to any of these borrowers.

No loans were modified as troubled debt restructurings during the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, nor were there loans modified as troubled debt restructurings within the previous twelve months for which there was a default during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

During 2008, the Company entered into an operating agreement (the "Operating Agreement") of 1850 De La Cruz LLC, a California limited liability company ("1850"), with Nanook Ventures LLC ("Nanook"), an unrelated party.  The purpose of the joint venture is to own and operate certain industrial land and buildings located in Santa Clara, California. At the time of closing in July 2008, the two properties were separately contributed to two new limited liability companies, Nanook Ventures One LLC and Nanook Ventures Two LLC that are wholly owned by 1850. The Company and Nanook are the Members of 1850 and NV Manager, LLC is the manager.

The Company received no distributions from 1850 during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. The net income to the Company from its investment in 1850 De La Cruz was approximately $44,000 and $43,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Real estate properties held for sale as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 consisted of properties acquired through foreclosure classified by property type as follows:

Transfers

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company transferred one marina property with a book value of approximately $1,463,000 from "Held for investment" to "Held for sale" as the property was listed for sale and a sale was expected within the next year. A loss was not recorded as a result of the transfer.

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company transferred one condominium property from "Held for investment" to "Held for sale" with a book value of approximately $4,183,000 as the property was listed for sale and a sale was expected within the next year. A loss was not recorded as a result of the transfer. The property was sold in September 2016.

Impairment Losses

No impairment losses were recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

Sales

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company sold one parcel of land and one office property for aggregate net sales proceeds of approximately $872,000, resulting in an insignificant loss.

In April 2017 (subsequent to quarter end), the Company sold the approximately 8.0 acres of land and entitlements, including related parking and garage structures, owned by Tahoe Stateline Venture, LLC located in South Lake Tahoe, California for net sales proceeds of approximately $42,300,000, resulting in a gain of approximately $13,200,000 (see Note 14).

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company sold one industrial property and one office building in an office complex for aggregate net sales proceeds of approximately $6,479,000, resulting in total gain on sale of real estate of approximately $4,839,000.

Real estate held for investment as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 consisted of properties acquired through foreclosure classified by property type as follows:

The balances of land and the major classes of depreciable property for real estate held for investment as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are as follows:

It is the Company's intent to sell the majority of its real estate properties held for investment, but expected sales are not probable to occur within the next year.

Depreciation expense was approximately $296,000 and $327,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Certain of the Company's real estate properties held for sale and investment are leased to tenants under noncancellable leases with remaining terms ranging from one to seven years. Certain of the leases require the tenant to pay all or some operating expenses of the properties. The future minimum rental income from noncancellable operating leases due within the five years subsequent to March 31, 2017 and thereafter is as follows:

 

The Company borrows funds under the revolving California Bank & Trust ("CB&T") Line of Credit and, until its termination in September 2016, a line of credit that was in place with Opus Bank ("Opus"). As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the outstanding balances and total commitments under the CB&T Line of Credit consisted of the following:

 

CB&T Line of Credit

In February 2014, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement and Advance Formula Agreement and related agreements with CB&T as the lender (the "CB&T Credit Facility").The agreements were amended and restated in April 2015 to add First Bank as an additional lender and to increase the maximum borrowings available (total commitment) under the facility to the lesser of a $30,000,000 maximum or the amount determined pursuant to a borrowing base calculation described in the Advance Formula Agreement. Pursuant to the First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Loan Documents dated March 1, 2016 (the "First Amendment"), the maximum commitment of the lenders under the facility has been increased from $30,000,000 to $50,000,000, such maximum commitment can be increased (on request of the Company and with the permission of the lenders) in the future to up to $75,000,000, and borrowings under the CB&T Credit Facility now mature on March 1, 2018.  In March 2017, First Bank increased its commitment amount by $5,000,000 and the total maximum commitment under the CB&T Credit Facility is now $55,000,000.

Such borrowings bear interest payable monthly at the prime rate of interest established by CB&T from time-to-time plus one quarter percent (.25%) per annum (4.25% at March 31, 2017). Upon a default such interest rate increases by 2.00%. The original CB&T Credit Facility required the payment of an origination fee of $100,000 and other issuance costs totaling $177,000 that were capitalized to deferred financing costs and were being amortized to interest expense using the straight-line method through the maturity date of the CB&T Credit Facility (fully amortized as of March 31, 2017). The First Amendment required the payment of an origination fee and other costs totaling $255,000 that was capitalized to deferred financing costs and is being amortized to interest expense using the straight-line method through the new maturity date.  The Company is also subject to certain ongoing administrative fees and expenses. Interest expense on the CB&T Credit Facility was approximately $160,000 and $188,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively (including $37,000 and $34,000, respectively, in amortization of deferred financing costs).

Borrowings are secured by certain assets of the Company. These collateral assets will include the grant to the lenders of first-priority deeds of trust on certain real property assets and trust deeds of the Company to be identified by the parties from time-to-time and all personal property of the Company, which collateral includes the assets described in the Security Agreement and in other customary collateral agreements that will be entered into by the parties from time-to-time. As of March 31, 2017, the carrying amount and classification of loans securing the CB&T Credit Facility were as follows:

The CB&T Credit Facility agreements contain financial covenants which are customary for a loan of this type. Management is not aware of any breach of these covenants as of March 31, 2017.

Opus Bank Line of Credit

In April 2014, the Company entered into a Secured Revolving Credit Loan Agreement (the "Opus Credit Agreement") and related agreements with Opus as the lender (the "Opus Credit Facility").  The Company repaid the Opus Credit Facility in full during 2016 and the facility has terminated.

The Opus Credit Facility required the payment of an origination fee of $100,000 and other issuance costs totaling $231,000 that were capitalized as deferred financing costs and were being amortized to interest expense using the straight-line method through the maturity date of the Opus Credit Facility. The Company was also subject to certain ongoing administrative fees and expenses. Interest expense on the Opus Credit Facility was approximately $109,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2016 (including $19,000 in amortization of deferred financing costs).

The Company had the following notes and loans payable outstanding as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

The following table shows maturities by year on these notes and loans payable as of March 31, 2017:

Tahoe Stateline Venture, LLC Loan Payable

In December 2014, Tahoe Stateline Venture, LLC ("TSV") entered into a Credit Agreement (the "Credit Agreement") and related documents with RaboBank, N.A. as the lender ("Lender") providing TSV with a loan (the "TSV Loan") of up to $14,500,000. TSV borrowed $10,445,000 at the first closing under the TSV Loan and an additional $3,830,000 was borrowed in September 2015.

The maturity date of the TSV Loan is January 1, 2021 (the "Maturity Date"). All outstanding borrowings under the TSV Loan documents bear interest initially at a rate of 3.47% per annum (the "Long Term Adjustable Rate"), provided that on January 1, 2018 the Long Term Adjustable Rate will be reset to Lender's then current market rate for three year fixed rate loans from comparable commercial real estate secured transactions, as determined by Lender in its sole discretion. Upon a default under the TSV Loan documents, the interest rate on the outstanding principal balance increases by an additional five percent (5.00%) per annum and the rate on any other outstanding obligations thereunder increases to ten percent (10.00%) per annum. Prepayments under the TSV Loan documents are subject to certain prepayment fees; provided that during the 90 day period immediately prior to January 1, 2018, and the 90 day period immediately prior to the Maturity Date, TSV may prepay the entire unpaid balance of the Loan in full, without any Prepayment Fee or penalty.

During the term of the TSV Loan, TSV will make equal combined payments of principal and accrued interest on the first day of each month in an amount calculated to fully amortize the original principal amount over a period of 300 months, subject to certain adjustments and the balance of the TSV Loan is due on the Maturity Date.

The Credit Agreement required the payment of a closing fee of $108,750 and certain administrative fees totaling approximately $218,000. The majority of these costs were paid out of proceeds from the loan and capitalized to deferred financing costs and are being amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method through the Maturity Date. During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, approximately $127,000 and $130,000, respectively, of interest expense was incurred (including approximately $9,000 and $9,000, respectively, of deferred financing costs amortized to interest expense). The balance of unamortized deferred financing costs was $137,000 and $146,000 as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

The TSV Loan documents contain financial covenants which are customary for loans of this type. Management is not aware of any breach of these covenants as of March 31, 2017.

Zalanta Construction Loan Payable

In August 2016, Zalanta Resort at the Village, LLC ("ZRV") and Zalanta Resort at the Village - Phase II, LLC ("ZRV II" and, together with ZRV, the "Borrowers") entered into a Construction Loan Agreement (the "Loan Agreement") and related documents with Western Alliance Bank as the lender ("Lender") providing the Borrowers with a loan (the "ZRV Loan") of up to $31,000,000, subject to the terms and conditions of the ZRV Loan documents, for the purpose of financing the construction of a new mixed-use retail and residential condominium building (the "Project") on land (the "Premises") owned by ZRV in South Lake Tahoe.

Borrowings under the ZRV Loan documents are only for payment or reimbursement of approved Project costs and such borrowings are subject to customary conditions for loans of this type.  The borrowings under the ZRV Loan may not exceed the lesser of (i) 60% of the value of the Project, determined on an "as is" basis; or (ii) 65% of the Borrowers' total costs of the Project, to be calculated in accordance with the Loan Agreement. All outstanding borrowings under the ZRV Loan will bear interest at the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate plus 1.50% (calculated on a floating daily basis) (the "Note Rate"), but in no event will the Note Rate be lower than the floor rate of five percent (5.0%) per annum. The Note Rate as of March 31, 2017 was 5.5%.  Upon a default under the Loan Agreement, the Note Rate increases by an additional five percent (5.0%) per annum.

Interest only payments are payable monthly from an established interest reserve. In addition, on the last day of the calendar quarter in which a Certificate of Occupancy is obtained with respect to completion of the first condominium in the Project, and continuing on the last day of each calendar quarter thereafter during the term of the ZRV Loan, Borrowers are required to repay $6 million of principal (the "Curtailment Requirement"). The balance of the ZRV Loan is due on August 3, 2018.

Borrowings are secured by: (i) a first mortgage lien on the Premises and certain additional property (the "Additional Premises") held by ZRV II and all improvements, amenities and appurtenances to the Premises and the Additional Premises, (ii) an assignment of all personal property, sales contracts, rents, leases, and ground leases associated with the Premises, and (iii) all design, development, service, management, leasing and construction contracts associated with the Premises.  In addition, ZRV has established a deposit account with Lender of $3,000,000 to be held as additional collateral for the ZRV Loan. The ZRV Loan documents contain provisions that allow for the sale of individual condominiums in the Project during the term of the ZRV Loan, and the removal of those units from the collateral base, in exchange for payment of proceeds of the sales to Lender.  Any such payment of sales proceeds to Lender will be applied to reduce the principal balance of the ZRV Loan and will reduce the quarterly Curtailment Requirement.

The Loan Agreement required the payment of an origination fee of $310,000 and other issuance costs totaling approximately $400,000. The majority of these costs were paid out of the loan proceeds and capitalized to deferred financing costs and are being amortized to the Project using the straight-line method through the maturity date. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, approximately $50,000 of deferred financing costs was amortized to the Project. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, approximately $290,000 of interest was incurred which was capitalized to the Project.

The ZRV Loan documents contain financial covenants which are customary for loans of this type. Management is not aware of any breach of these covenants as of March 31, 2017.

In consideration of the management services rendered to the Company pursuant to the management agreement between the Company and OFG (the "Management Agreement"), OFG is entitled to receive from the Company a management fee payable monthly, subject to a maximum of 2.75% per annum of the average unpaid balance of the Company's loans.

All of the Company's loans are serviced by OFG, in consideration for which OFG receives a monthly fee, which, when added to all other fees paid in connection with the servicing of a particular loan, does not exceed the lesser of the customary, competitive fee paid in the community where the loan is placed for the provision of such mortgage services on that type of loan, or up to 0.25% per annum of the unpaid principal balance of the loans.

OFG, at its sole discretion may, on a monthly basis, adjust the management and servicing fees as long as they do not exceed the allowable limits calculated on an annual basis. Even though the fees for a month may exceed ¹/₁₂ of the maximum limits, at the end of the calendar year the sum of the fees collected for each of the 12 months must be equal to or less than the stated limits. Management fees amounted to approximately $948,000 and $766,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively and are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Servicing fees amounted to approximately $86,000 and $70,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company owed management and servicing fees to OFG in the amount of approximately $342,000 and $324,000, respectively.

During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2016, OFG elected to take the maximum compensation that it is able to take pursuant to the Company's charter and will likely continue to take the maximum compensation for the foreseeable future.

Pursuant to the charter, OFG receives all late payment charges from borrowers on loans owned by the Company. The amounts paid to or collected by OFG for such charges totaled approximately $15,000 and $3,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. In addition, the Company remits other miscellaneous fees to OFG, which are collected from loan payments, loan payoffs or advances from loan principal (i.e. funding, demand and partial release fees). The amounts paid to or collected by OFG for such fees totaled approximately $4,000 and $4,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

OFG originates all loans the Company invests in and receives loan origination and extension fees from borrowers. During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, OFG earned approximately $528,000 and $718,000, respectively, in loan fees on loans originated or extended of $26,655,000 and $35,150,000, respectively.

OFG is reimbursed by the Company for the actual cost of goods, services and materials used for or by the Company and paid by OFG and the salary and related salary expense of OFG's non-management and non-supervisory personnel performing services for the Company which could be performed by independent parties (subject to certain limitations in the Management Agreement). The amounts reimbursed to OFG by the Company were $93,000 and $114,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and approximately $31,000 and $36,000 were payable to OFG at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The Company made no reimbursements to OFG's officers for allowed expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

The Company paid Investor's Yield, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of OFG) less than $1,000 in fees related to certain Company loans during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

Dividends

On March 16, 2017, the board of directors declared a $0.08 dividend on our shares of Common Stock to holders of record as of March 31, 2017. The dividend was paid on April 13, 2017 and totaled $819,798.

Stock Repurchase Program

On December 11, 2015, the Board of Directors authorized a new Rule 10b5-1 stock repurchase plan (the "2016 Repurchase Plan") under which the Company could purchase up to $7.5 million of its Common Stock. Under the 2016 Repurchase Plan, repurchases were to be funded from available working capital, and the repurchased shares would return to the status of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock. The 2016 Repurchase Plan provided for stock repurchases to commence on April 1, 2016 and was subject to certain price, volume and timing constraints specified in the brokerage agreement. No shares were repurchased under the 2016 Repurchase Plan and it expired on March 31, 2017.

In accordance with the charter, the Company is required to maintain cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities as contingency reserves in an aggregate amount of 1‑1/2% of Capital as defined in the charter. Although the Manager believes the contingency reserves are adequate, it could become necessary for the Company to sell or otherwise liquidate certain of its investments or other assets to cover such contingencies on terms which might not be favorable to the Company, which could lead to unanticipated losses upon sale of such assets.

The contingency reserves required per the charter as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were approximately $3,726,000 and $3,738,000, respectively, and are reported as restricted cash in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The $6,500,000 required to be held in non-interest bearing accounts as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 pursuant to certain of the Company's credit agreements satisfied this contingency reserve requirement.

The Company discloses fair value of its financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities pursuant to ASC 820 – Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.  ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.

Fair value is defined in ASC 820 as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

liabilities; quoted prices in active markets that are not active; or other inputs that are

observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full

term of the assets or liabilities

Company's own data or assumptions.

Level 3 inputs include unobservable inputs that are used when there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability measured at fair value. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company's assessment of the significance of a particular input requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability being measured.

Management monitors the availability of observable market data to assess the appropriate classification of financial instruments within the fair value hierarchy. Changes in economic conditions or model-based valuation techniques may require the transfer of financial instruments from one fair value level to another.  In such instances, the transfer is reported at the beginning of the reporting period.

Management evaluates the significance of transfers between levels based upon the nature of the financial instrument and size of the transfer relative to total assets, total liabilities or total earnings.

The following is a description of the Company's valuation methodologies used to measure and disclose the fair values of its financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities on a nonrecurring basis. There were no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan may be considered impaired and a specific allowance for loan losses is established.  A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. Once a loan is identified as impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with ASC 310-10-35.  The fair value of impaired loans is estimated by either an observable market price (if available) or the fair value of the underlying collateral, if collateral dependent.  The fair value of the loan's collateral is determined by third party appraisals (by licensed appraisers), broker price opinions, comparable property sales or other indications of value. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, all impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral by obtaining third party appraisals that valued the collateral primarily by utilizing an income or market approach or some combination of the two.  In accordance with ASC 820, impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy.  Because appraisals used by management generally include significant unobservable inputs and market data, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3. Unobservable market data included in appraisals often includes adjustments to comparable property sales for such items as location, size and quality to estimate fair values using a sales comparison approach.  Unobservable market data also includes cash flow assumptions and capitalization rates used to estimate fair values under an income approach.

Real estate held for sale and investment includes properties acquired through foreclosure of the related loans. When property is acquired, any excess of the Company's recorded investment in the loan and accrued interest income over the estimated fair market value of the property, net of estimated selling costs, is charged against the allowance for loan losses. Subsequently, real estate properties held for sale are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. The Company periodically compares the carrying value of real estate held for investment to expected future cash flows as determined by internally or third party generated valuations (including third party appraisals that primarily utilize an income or market approach or some combination of the two) for the purpose of assessing the recoverability of the recorded amounts. If the carrying value exceeds future undiscounted cash flows, the assets are reduced to fair value. The fair value of real estate held for sale and investment is estimated using appraisals in a manner similar to that of collateral dependent impaired loans described above which generally results in a Level 3 classification in the fair value hierarchy.

The following table presents information about the Company's assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

The provision for loan losses based on the fair value of loan collateral less estimated selling costs for the impaired loans above totaled approximately $0 and $9,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. No impairment losses were recorded on real estate properties during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no transfers into or out of Levels 1 and 2.

  The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

March 31, 2017:

December 31, 2016:

Where only one percentage is presented in the above table there was only one unobservable input of that type for one loan or property. Adjustments to comparable sales included items such as market conditions, location, size, condition, access/frontage and intended use. A weighted average of an unobservable input is presented in the table above only to the extent there were multiple impaired loans or real estate properties measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

 

The approximate carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are as follows:

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of each class of financial instruments:

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash: The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash approximates the fair value because of the relatively short maturity and/or liquid nature of these instruments and are classified as Level 1.

Loans, net: Except as it relates to impaired loans measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis discussed previously, the fair value of loans is estimated using discounted cash flow methodology, using discount rates, which, in the opinion of management, best reflect current market interest rates that would be offered for loans with similar characteristics and credit quality but are often unobservable resulting in a Level 3 classification. Accrued interest and advances receivable relate to loans and are thus classified as Level 3.

Investment in limited liability company: The fair value of the Company's investment in limited liability company is estimated based on an appraisal obtained and is classified as Level 3 because the appraisal itself and/or adjustments thereto include unobservable data similar to the unobservable data discussed in the disclosures related to assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

Line of credit payable: The fair values of the Company's line of credit is estimated based upon a discounted cash flow model using comparable market indicators of current pricing for the same or similar issue or on the current rate offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturity and is generally observable resulting in a Level 2 classification. Accrued interest payable associated with the line of credit is also classified as Level 2.

Notes and loans payable: The fair values of the Company's notes and loans payable and related accrued interest payable are estimated based upon a discounted cash flow model using comparable market indicators of current pricing for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities resulting in either a Level 2 or Level 3 classification. Generally, Level 2 inputs are used for notes and loans payable with maturities of one year or less or that have been entered into in relatively close proximity to the balance sheet date and Level 3 inputs are used for other notes and loans payable. Accrued interest payable associated with the notes and loans payable is also classified as either Level 2 or Level 3.

As of March 31, 2017, the Company has commitments to advance additional funds to borrowers of construction, rehabilitation and other loans in the total amount of approximately $30,360,000 (including approximately $4,017,000 in interest reserves).

The Company is involved in various legal actions arising in the normal course of business.  In the opinion of management, such matters will not have a material effect upon the financial position of the Company.

In May 2017, the Company filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933 Act") with respect to an aggregate of up to $100.0 million of common stock, preferred stock, rights to purchase common stock or preferred stock, depositary shares, warrants and units comprised of two or more types of the foregoing securities that may be offered and  sold by the Company from time to time, after the effective date of the shelf registration statement,  pursuant to Rule 415 of the 1933 Act.  The SEC has not declared this shelf registration statement effective and there can be no assurance when or if the shelf registration statement will be declared effective.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward Looking Statements

The following discussion provides information to assist you in understanding our financial condition and results of operations.  This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, plans and objectives. When we use the words "may," "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "plan," "continue," "intend," "should," "project" or similar expressions, it intends to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, as more particularly set forth in our filings with the SEC, including those described in the "Forward Looking Statements" and "Risk Factors" sections of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management's analysis only as of the date hereof. New risks and uncertainties arise over time and it is not possible to predict those events or how they may affect us. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to, and do not intend to, update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Overview and Background

We are a specialty finance company that focuses on the origination, investment and management of commercial real estate mortgage loans.  We provide customized, short-term capital to small and middle-market investors and developers who require speed and flexibility. We are organized and conduct our operations to qualify as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We are externally managed and advised by Owens Financial Group, Inc. ("OFG" or the "Manager"), a specialized commercial real estate management company that has originated, serviced and managed alternative commercial real estate investments since 1951.

The Company is a Maryland corporation formed to reorganize the business of its predecessor, OMIF, into a publicly traded REIT. OMIF was a California Limited Partnership registered with the SEC that was formed in 1983 for the purposes of funding and servicing short-term commercial real estate loans. Beginning in 2009, OMIF experienced liquidity issues as its borrowers were unable to access credit sources to pay off its loans.  OMIF eventually foreclosed on a substantial portion of its loan portfolio, repositioning many of the properties for investment or eventual sale.  OMIF also experienced a significant increase in capital withdrawal requests that it was unable to honor due to insufficient cash, net of reserves, and restrictions under the terms of its bank line of credit. In addition, OMIF was restricted by provisions within the partnership agreement from making additional investments in mortgage loans while qualified redemption requests remained pending and unpaid. In addition to increasing investor liquidity through public listing of its stock, the Company was created to provide the opportunity for resuming mortgage lending activities, with the goal of increasing income to stockholders.

On May 20, 2013, OMIF merged with and into the Company with the Company as the surviving entity, succeeding to and continuing the operations of OMIF. The Company now, by virtue of the Merger, directly or indirectly owns all of the assets and business formerly owned by OMIF. The Company is a deemed successor issuer to OMIF pursuant to Rule 12g-3(a) under the Exchange Act, and on July 1, 2013, the Company's Common Stock was listed on the NYSE MKT exchange.  For accounting purposes, the Merger was treated as a transfer of assets and exchange of shares between entities under common control. The accounting basis used to initially record the assets and liabilities in the Company was the carryover basis of OMIF.

Our primary sources of revenue are interest income earned on our loan portfolio and revenues we generate from our operating real estate assets. We have resumed originating loans and believe the Company is well positioned to capitalize on lending opportunities as the economy continues to recover. However, there can be no assurances that we will be able to identify and make loans to suitable commercial real estate borrowers or have adequate liquidity and capital to fund such loans.

Our operating results are affected primarily by:

·	the level of foreclosures and related loan and real estate losses experienced;

 

·	the income or losses from foreclosed properties prior to the time of disposal;

·	the amount of cash available to invest in loans;

·	the amount of borrowing to finance loan investments and our cost of funds on such borrowing;

·	the level of real estate lending activity in the markets serviced;

·	the ability to identify and lend to suitable borrowers;

·	the interest rates we are able to charge on loans; and

·	the level of delinquencies on loans.

Between 2008 and 2013, we experienced increased delinquent loans and foreclosures which created substantial losses. As a result, we owned significantly more real estate than in the past, which has reduced cash flow and net income. As of March 31, 2017, approximately 3% of our loans are impaired and/or past maturity. As of March 31, 2017, we own approximately $117 million (book value) of real estate held for sale or investment, which is approximately 43% of total assets. During the three month period ended March 31, 2017, we sold two properties for net sales proceeds of $872,000 that resulted in an insignificant loss. We will continue to attempt to sell certain of our properties but may need to sell them for losses or wait until market values recover. In addition, under the REIT tax rules, we may be subject to a "prohibited transaction" penalty tax on tax gains from the sale of our properties in certain circumstances. In addition, we are also limited in the number and dollar amount of properties we can sell in a given year under the REIT tax rules.

Although management currently believes that only one of our delinquent loans will result in a credit loss to the Company (and has caused the Company to record a specific allowance for loan losses on such loans), real estate values could decrease further. Management continues to perform frequent evaluations of such collateral values using internal and external sources, including the use of updated independent appraisals.  As a result of these evaluations, the allowance for loan losses and our investments in real estate could change in the near term, and such changes could be material.

Our website can be found at www.owensmortgage.com. We make available through the website, access to our annual and quarterly financial statements, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, as well as proxy statements and other periodic reports and filings submitted to the SEC. We also provide access to certain Company presentations, fact sheets, press releases and corporate governance information.

Business Strategy

Our primary business objective is to provide our stockholders with attractive risk-adjusted returns by producing consistent and predictable dividends while maintaining a strong balance sheet. We believe we have positioned the Company for future growth and seek to increase distributions to stockholders through active portfolio management and execution of our business plan which is outlined below:

·	Capitalize on market lending opportunity by leveraging our existing origination network to expand our commercial real estate loan portfolio.

·	Enhance and reposition our commercial real estate assets through the investment of capital and strategic management.

·	Increase liquidity available for lending activities by focusing on opportunities to remove real estate assets from our balance sheet.

·	Manage leverage to marginally expand sources of liquidity while maintaining a conservative balance sheet.

Current Market Conditions, Risks and Recent Trends

Our ability to execute our business strategy, particularly the growth of our loan portfolio, is dependent on many factors, including our ability to access financing on favorable terms.  The previous economic downturn had a significant negative impact on both us and our borrowers.  If similar economic conditions recur in the future, it may limit our options for obtaining financing on favorable terms and may also adversely impact the creditworthiness of our borrowers which could result in their inability to repay their loans.

The commercial real estate markets continue to improve, but uncertainty remains as a result of global market instability, the current political climate and other matters and their potential impact on the U.S. economy and commercial real estate markets.  In addition, the growth in multifamily rental rates seen over the past few years are showing signs of stabilizing. If real estate values decline again and/or rent growth subsides, it may limit our new loan originations since borrowers often use increases in the value of, and revenues produced from, their existing properties to support the purchase or investment in additional properties.  Declining real estate values may also significantly increase the likelihood that we will incur losses on our loans in the event of default because the value of our collateral may be insufficient to cover our investment in the loan.  Any sustained period of increased payment delinquencies, foreclosures or losses could adversely affect both our interest income from loans as well as our ability to originate loans, which would significantly impact our revenues, results of operations, financial condition, business prospects and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

 

The economic environment over the past few years has seen continued improvement in commercial real estate values which has generally increased payoffs and reduced the credit exposure in our loan portfolio.  We have made, and continue to make, modifications and extensions to loans when it is economically feasible to do so.  In some cases, a modification is a more viable alternative to foreclosure proceedings when a borrower cannot comply with loan terms.  In doing so, lower borrower interest rates, combined with non-performing loans, would lower our net interest margins when comparing interest income to our costs of financing.  If the markets were to deteriorate and another prolonged economic downturn was to occur, we believe there could be additional loan modifications and delinquencies, which may result in reduced net interest margins and additional losses throughout our sector.

We believe that improvement in commercial real estate values has also resulted in increased values of some of our real estate assets. Accordingly, as our real estate assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell, it is possible that we have substantial imbedded gains in certain of our real estate properties held for sale and investment that are not reflected in our financial statements or in the value of our stock.

Recent increases in market interest rates have increased interest expense under our Credit Facility and certain other of our borrowings that bear interest at variable rates.  Due to competitive conditions in our markets, we have been unable to pass increases in our cost of funds through to our borrowers on the majority of our recent loan investments and, accordingly, the interest rates we receive on our loans has remained relatively unchanged.  This increase in our cost of funds without corresponding increases in the rates we charge our borrowers has resulted in a smaller interest margin and, if these conditions continue, will adversely affect our results of operations in the future.

Critical Accounting Policies

Please refer to the section of ORM's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 entitled "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations —Critical Accounting Policies" for a discussion of our critical accounting policies. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, there were no material changes to these policies.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates based on the information available that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the balance sheet dates and revenues and expenses for the reporting periods. Such estimates relate principally to the determination of (1) the allowance for loan losses; (2) the valuation of real estate held for sale and investment (at acquisition and subsequently); and (3) the recoverability of deferred income tax assets. While we believe that these accounting policies and estimates are based on sound measurement criteria, actual future events can and often do result in outcomes that can be materially different from these estimates and forecasts.

Results of Operations

Net income attributable to our common stockholders decreased approximately $4,543,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to the corresponding period in 2016. This decrease was primarily a result of the following:

·

A decrease in gain on sale of real estate of $4,839,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 due to the sale of two properties during the quarter ended March 31, 2016 with gains totaling $4,839,000 as compared to the sale of two properties during the quarter ended March 31, 2017 that resulted in an insignificant loss.

·

A decrease in rental and other income from real estate properties net of expenses on such properties of $573,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 (from income of $6,000 in 2016 to loss of $567,000 in 2017) as a result of the sale of four operating properties during 2016, a one-time increase in property tax assessments levied on our property located in Tacoma, Washington of $170,000 and decreased revenue on our golf course located in Auburn, California as a result of inclement weather in Northern California. Many of the remaining properties held by us are non-operating properties that do not generate income and, thus, will likely continue to generate a loss until they are disposed of in 2017 and beyond.

·	An increase in management and service fees of $199,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 due to an increase in the average balance of loans in the Company's portfolio of 24% between the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016.

 

Comparison of Results of Operations for Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016

The following table sets forth our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:

nm – not meaningful

Interest income on loans increased $504,000 (25% increase) during the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to 2016. This increase was primarily due to an increase in the average balance of performing loans between the quarter ended March 31, 2016 and the quarter ended March 31, 2017 of approximately 29%.

Rental and other income from real estate properties decreased $1,194,000 (56% decrease) during the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to 2016, primarily due to the sale of four operating properties during the year ended December 31, 2016. These properties had rental income totaling approximately $1,197,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2016. There was also a decrease in income from our golf course located in Auburn, California as a result of inclement weather in Northern California during the quarter.

Management fees increased $182,000 (24% increase) and servicing fees increased $17,000 (24% increase) during the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to 2016. The increase in management and service fees during 2017 was due to an increase in the average balance of loans in the Company's portfolio of 24% between the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016.

The maximum management fee permitted under the Company's charter is 2.75% per year of the average unpaid balance of mortgage loans and, accordingly, management fees have (and will continue to) increase proportionately as we deploy capital into loans and increase our loan balances.

In determining whether to take the maximum management fees permitted, the Manager may consider a number of factors, including current market yields, delinquency experience, un-invested cash and real estate activities. During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Manager chose to take the maximum compensation that it is able to take pursuant to the charter and will likely continue to take the maximum compensation for the foreseeable future.

General and administrative expense decreased $70,000 (13% decrease) during the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to 2016, due primarily to lower legal and appraisal expenses during 2017 as compared to 2016.

Rental and other expenses on real estate properties decreased $587,000 (33% decrease) during the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to 2016, primarily due to the sale of four operating properties during the year ended December 31, 2016. These properties had rental expenses totaling approximately $764,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2016. The decrease from the sale of these properties was offset by a one-time increase in property tax assessments levied on our mixed-use property located in Tacoma, Washington in the amount of approximately $170,000 during the quarter ended March 31, 2017.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $34,000 (10% decrease) during the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to 2016, primarily due to the sale of four depreciable properties during the year ended December 31, 2016. These properties had depreciation expense totaling approximately $41,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2016.

Interest expense decreased $396,000 (58% decrease) during the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to 2016, due to the sale of the TOTB Miami properties and the repayment of the debt securing the properties during the third quarter of 2016 and due to a decrease in the average balance on our line of credit during the quarter ended March 31, 2017, as compared to 2016.

The provision for loan losses of $38,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2017 was the result of an analysis performed on the loan portfolio. The general loan loss allowance increased $38,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2017 primarily due to an increase in the balance of performing loans during the quarter. The specific loan loss allowance decreased $108,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2017 as a result of a charge-off against the loan loss allowance from the partial payoff of an impaired loan during the quarter. We recorded a provision for loan losses of $111,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2016.

Gain on sales of real estate decreased $4,839,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to 2016. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we sold one parcel of land and one office property for aggregate net sales proceeds of approximately $872,000, resulting in an insignificant loss. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we sold one industrial property and one office building in an office complex for gains totaling approximately $4,839,000.

Financial Condition

March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016

Loan Portfolio

During the quarter ended March 31, 2017, we originated five new loans in the aggregate amount of approximately $11,572,000 ($14,943,000 when fully funded) and advanced additional amounts to borrowers on existing loans of approximately $4,162,000 (total of $15,734,000).  Four of the new loans are incrementally funded for construction, renovation and/or interest and have $3,328,000 available to be funded in the future. We also received full or partial payoffs on eight loans totaling $8,695,000. We extended the maturity dates of five loans (between 8 and 18 months) with principal balances aggregating approximately $11,507,000 during the quarter ended March 31, 2017.

Our portfolio of loan investments decreased from 55 to 54 loans, and the average loan balance increased from $2,358,000 to $2,532,000, between December 31, 2016 and March 31, 2017.

As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had two loans that were impaired totaling approximately $4,178,000 (3.1% of the portfolio) and $4,884,000 (3.8%), respectively.  This included matured loans totaling $3,953,000 (2.9%) and $4,656,000 (3.6%), respectively. In addition, $5,227,000 (3.8%) and $8,686,000 (6.7%) of loans were past maturity but current in making monthly payments as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively (combined total of impaired and past maturity loans of $9,405,000 (6.9%) and $13,570,000 (10.5%), respectively). As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, no loans were in the process of foreclosure or involved borrowers who were in bankruptcy.

As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, approximately $136,480,000 (99.8%) and $129,454,000 (99.8%) of our loans are interest-only and require the borrower to make a "balloon payment" on the principal amount upon maturity of the loan. To the extent that a borrower has an obligation to pay mortgage loan principal in a large lump sum payment, its ability to satisfy this obligation may be dependent upon its ability to sell the property, obtain suitable refinancing or otherwise raise a substantial cash amount. As a result, these loans involve a higher risk of default than fully amortizing loans. Borrowers occasionally are not able to pay the full amount due at the maturity date.  We may allow these borrowers to continue making the regularly scheduled monthly interest payments for certain periods of time to assist the borrower in meeting the balloon payment obligation without formally filing a notice of default.  These loans for which the principal is due and payable, but the borrower has failed to make such payment of principal, are referred to as "past maturity loans". As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had seven and eight past maturity loans totaling approximately $9,180,000 and $13,342,000, respectively.

As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we held the following types of loans:

		March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016
By Property Type:
Commercial		$	110,682,477			$	102,442,111
Residential			17,783,924				19,001,677
Land			8,238,523				8,238,523
		$	136,704,924			$	129,682,311
By Position:
Senior loans		$	133,897,052			$	126,873,673
Junior loans			2,807,872				2,808,638
		$	136,704,924			$	129,682,311

 

The types of property securing the Company's commercial real estate loans are as follows as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

Scheduled maturities of loan investments as of March 31, 2017 and the interest rate sensitivity of such loans are as follows: 

Our variable rate loans currently use as indices the three-month or six-month LIBOR rates (1.15% and 1.42%, respectively, as of March 31, 2017), or include terms whereby the interest rate is increased at a later date. Premiums over the index vary for each loan and all such loans have specified floor rates.

 

The following is a schedule by geographic location of loan investments as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016: