C & F FINANCIAL CORP - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - C & F FINANCIAL CORP	cffi-20170331ex312d486b8.htm
EX-32 - EX-32 - C & F FINANCIAL CORP	cffi-20170331xex32.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - C & F FINANCIAL CORP	cffi-20170331ex31138c509.htm

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


☒	Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017


☐	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from _________ to _________

Commission File Number 000-23423

C&F FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Virginia	54-1680165
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

802 Main Street West Point, VA	23181
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(804) 843-2360

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☒
Non-accelerated filer	☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	☐
		Emerging growth company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

At May 5, 2017, the latest practicable date for determination, 3,487,143 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value, of the registrant were outstanding.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I - Financial Information		Page

Item 1.	Financial Statements	3

	Consolidated Balance Sheets - March 31, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, 2016	3

	Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited) - Three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016	4

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (unaudited) - Three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016	5

	Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity (unaudited) - Three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016	6

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) - Three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016	7

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	8

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	32

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	53

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	53

PART II - Other Information

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	54

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	54

Item 6.	Exhibits	55

	Signatures	56

Table of Contents

Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except for share and per share amounts)


	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
Assets		(unaudited)		*
Cash and due from banks	$	11,971	$	12,892
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		108,567		90,309
Total cash and cash equivalents		120,538		103,201
Securities—available for sale at fair value, amortized cost of $210,642 and $207,893, respectively		213,079		210,026
Loans held for sale, at fair value		41,277		52,027
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $36,734 and $37,066, respectively		964,093		960,162
Restricted stocks, at cost		3,443		3,403
Corporate premises and equipment, net		35,695		35,804
Other real estate owned, net of valuation allowance of $57 and $86, respectively		376		195
Accrued interest receivable		6,765		7,261
Goodwill		14,425		14,425
Core deposit and other amortizable intangibles, net		2,079		2,269
Bank-owned life insurance		15,201		15,103
Other assets		47,493		48,116
Total assets	$	1,464,464	$	1,451,992

Liabilities
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits	$	236,686	$	218,655
Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits		550,168		556,851
Time deposits		345,670		344,415
Total deposits		1,132,524		1,119,921
Short-term borrowings		13,561		12,363
Long-term borrowings		127,029		127,029
Trust preferred capital notes		25,183		25,175
Accrued interest payable		708		703
Other liabilities		24,073		27,587
Total liabilities		1,323,078		1,312,778

Commitments and contingent liabilities

Shareholders’ Equity
Common stock ($1.00 par value, 8,000,000 shares authorized, 3,485,867 and 3,472,561 shares issued and outstanding, respectively, includes 141,170 and 141,755 of unvested shares, respectively)		3,345		3,331
Additional paid-in capital		12,029		11,705
Retained earnings		126,743		125,162
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net		(731)		(984)
Total shareholders’ equity		141,386		139,214
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,464,464	$	1,451,992

* Derived from audited consolidated financial statements.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except for share and per share amounts)


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
Interest income
Interest and fees on loans	$	20,368	$	20,206
Interest on interest-bearing deposits and federal funds sold		209		177
Interest and dividends on securities
U.S. government agencies and corporations		78		101
Mortgage-backed securities		338		334
Tax-exempt obligations of states and political subdivisions		863		981
Taxable obligations of states and political subdivisions		52		46
Corporate bonds and other		113		120
Total interest income		22,021		21,965
Interest expense
Savings and interest-bearing deposits		287		292
Time deposits		848		809
Borrowings		852		878
Trust preferred capital notes		283		283
Total interest expense		2,270		2,262
Net interest income		19,751		19,703
Provision for loan losses		4,400		4,600
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		15,351		15,103
Noninterest income
Gains on sales of loans		1,943		1,730
Service charges on deposit accounts		1,069		963
Other service charges and fees		2,046		1,684
Net gains on calls and sales of available for sale securities		1		1
Wealth management services income		378		276
Other		709		509
Total noninterest income		6,146		5,163
Noninterest expenses
Salaries and employee benefits		10,669		10,171
Occupancy		2,621		2,334
Other		4,555		4,585
Total noninterest expenses		17,845		17,090
Income before income taxes		3,652		3,176
Income tax expense		921		692
Net income	$	2,731	$	2,484
Net income per share - basic	$	0.78	$	0.72
Net income per share - assuming dilution	$	0.78	$	0.72
Weighted average number of shares outstanding - basic		3,483,007		3,448,630
Weighted average number of shares outstanding - assuming dilution		3,483,323		3,449,739

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
Net income	$	2,731	$	2,484
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Changes in defined benefit plan assets and benefit obligations
Changes in net loss arising during the period1		38		38
Tax effect		(13)		(13)
Amortization of prior service cost arising during the period1		(15)		(15)
Tax effect		5		5
Net of tax amount		15		15

Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedging instruments
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period		65		(538)
Tax effect		(25)		188
Net of tax amount		40		(350)

Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period		306		1,684
Tax effect		(107)		(589)
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income2		(1)		(1)
Tax effect		—		—
Net of tax amount		198		1,094
Other comprehensive income		253		759
Comprehensive income	$	2,984	$	3,243

These items are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost, which is a component of “Salaries and employee benefits” on the consolidated statements of income. See “Note 6: Employee Benefit Plans,” for additional information.

Gains are included in “Net gains on calls and sales of available for sale securities" on the consolidated statements of income.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share amounts)


							Accumulated
			Additional				Other		Total
	Common		Paid - In		Retained		Comprehensive		Shareholders’
	Stock		Capital		Earnings		Income (Loss)		Equity
Balance December 31, 2016	$	3,331	$	11,705	$	125,162	$	(984)	$	139,214
Comprehensive income:
Net income		—		—		2,731		—		2,731
Other comprehensive income		—		—		—		253		253
Stock options exercised		2		81		—		—		83
Share-based compensation		—		403		—		—		403
Restricted stock vested		15		(15)		—		—		—
Common stock issued		1		36		—		—		37
Common stock purchased		(4)		(181)		—		—		(185)
Cash dividends declared – common stock ($0.33 per share)		—		—		(1,150)		—		(1,150)
Balance March 31, 2017	$	3,345	$	12,029	$	126,743	$	(731)	$	141,386


							Accumulated
			Additional				Other		Total
	Common		Paid - In		Retained		Comprehensive		Shareholders’
	Stock		Capital		Earnings		Income		Equity
Balance December 31, 2015	$	3,301	$	10,420	$	116,167	$	1,171	$	131,059
Comprehensive income:
Net income		—		—		2,484		—		2,484
Other comprehensive income		—		—		—		759		759
Share-based compensation		—		305		—		—		305
Restricted stock vested		7		(7)		—		—		—
Common stock issued		1		36		—		—		37
Common stock purchased		(4)		(132)		—		—		(136)
Cash dividends declared – common stock ($0.32 per share)		—		—		(1,104)		—		(1,104)
Balance March 31, 2016	$	3,305	$	10,622	$	117,547	$	1,930	$	133,404

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
Operating activities:
Net income	$	2,731	$	2,484
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		654		621
Provision for loan losses		4,400		4,600
Provision for indemnifications		36		52
Share-based compensation		403		305
Net accretion of certain acquisition-related fair value adjustments		(325)		(312)
Net amortization of discounts and amortization of premiums on securities		407		423
Realized gains on sales and calls of securities		(1)		(1)
Net realized losses (gains) on sales of other real estate owned		2		(18)
Net realized gains on sale of corporate premises and equipment		—		(46)
Income from bank-owned life insurance		(84)		(86)
Origination of loans held for sale		(141,097)		(103,972)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale		153,790		124,276
Gains on sales of loans held for sale		(1,943)		(1,730)
Change in other assets and liabilities:
Accrued interest receivable		496		122
Other assets		532		(777)
Accrued interest payable		5		27
Other liabilities		(3,485)		(857)
Net cash provided by operating activities		16,521		25,111
Investing activities:
Proceeds from maturities, calls and sales of securities available for sale and payments on mortgage-backed securities		11,368		12,222
Purchases of securities available for sale		(14,523)		(7,649)
Net redemptions of restricted stocks		(40)		(58)
Net increase in loans		(8,031)		(27,674)
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned		25		160
Purchases of corporate premises and equipment, net		(569)		(558)
Net cash used in investing activities		(11,770)		(23,557)
Financing activities:
Net increase in demand, interest-bearing demand and savings deposits		11,348		4,590
Net increase (decrease) in time deposits		1,255		(3,135)
Net increase (decrease) in borrowings		1,198		(3,555)
Issuance of common stock		37		37
Purchase of common stock, including shares withheld to pay taxes		(185)		(136)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		83		—
Cash dividends		(1,150)		(1,104)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		12,586		(3,303)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		17,337		(1,749)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		103,201		152,943
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	120,538	$	151,194
Supplemental disclosure
Interest paid	$	2,256	$	2,226
Income taxes paid		14		13
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities
Unrealized gains on securities available for sale	$	306	$	1,684
Transfers from loans to other real estate owned		208		394
Pension adjustment		23		23
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedging instruments		65		(538)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation: The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial reporting and with applicable quarterly reporting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). They do not include all of the information and notes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. Therefore, these consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the C&F Financial Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of C&F Financial Corporation (the Corporation) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Citizens and Farmers Bank (the Bank or C&F Bank). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In addition, the Corporation owns C&F Financial Statutory Trust I, C&F Financial Statutory Trust II and Central Virginia Bankshares Statutory Trust I, all of which are unconsolidated subsidiaries. The subordinated debt owed to these trusts is reported as a liability of the Corporation. The accounting and reporting policies of C&F Financial Corporation and Subsidiary conform to U.S. GAAP and to predominant practices within the banking industry.

Nature of Operations: The Corporation is a bank holding company incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Corporation owns all of the stock of its subsidiary, C&F Bank, which is an independent commercial bank chartered under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia.

C&F Bank has five wholly-owned subsidiaries: C&F Mortgage Corporation and Subsidiary (C&F Mortgage), C&F Finance Company (C&F Finance), C&F Wealth Management Corporation (C&F Wealth Management), C&F Insurance Services, Inc. and CVB Title Services, Inc., all incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. C&F Mortgage, organized in September 1995, was formed to originate and sell residential mortgages and through its subsidiary, Certified Appraisals LLC, provides ancillary mortgage loan production services for residential appraisals. C&F Finance, acquired on September 1, 2002, is a finance company purchasing automobile loans through indirect lending programs. C&F Wealth Management, organized in April 1995, is a full-service brokerage firm offering a comprehensive range of wealth management services and insurance products through an alliance with an independent broker/dealer. C&F Insurance Services, Inc., organized in July 1999, owns an equity interest in an insurance agency that sells insurance products to customers of C&F Bank, C&F Mortgage and other financial institutions that have an equity interest in the agency. CVB Title Services, Inc. was organized for the primary purpose of owning membership interests in two insurance-related limited liability companies. Business segment data is presented in Note 8.

Basis of Presentation: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the allowance for indemnifications, impairment of loans, impairment of securities, the valuation of other real estate owned, the projected benefit obligation under the defined benefit pension plan, the valuation of deferred taxes, fair value measurements and goodwill impairment. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations in these financial statements, have been made.

Reclassification: Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period financial statements to conform to the current period presentation. None of these reclassifications are considered material.

Adoption of New Accounting Standard: During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Corporation adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-09 “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employer Share-

Table of Contents

Based Payment Accounting”. This ASU simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions, one of which is the recognition of excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to share-based payments, including tax benefits of dividends on share-based payment awards. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-09, such tax consequences were recognized as components of additional paid-in capital. With the adoption of this ASU, tax benefits and deficiencies are recognized within income tax expense. In accordance with the adoption provisions of ASU 2016-09, the results for the first quarter of 2016 include only the excess tax benefits attributable to the first quarter of 2016 in the amount of $60,000.

Derivative Financial Instruments: The Corporation recognizes derivative financial instruments at fair value as either an other asset or other liability in the consolidated balance sheet. The Corporation’s derivative financial instruments may include (1) interest rate lock commitments (IRLCs) on mortgage loans that will be sold in the secondary market on a best efforts basis and the related forward commitments to sell mortgage loans, (2) interest rate swaps with certain qualifying commercial loan customers and dealer counterparties and (3) interest rate swaps that qualify as cash flow hedges on the Corporation’s trust preferred capital notes. Because the IRLCs, forward sales commitments and interest rate swaps with loan customers and dealer counterparties are not designated as hedging instruments, adjustments to reflect unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value of these instruments are reported as noninterest income or noninterest expense, as applicable. The effective portion of the gain or loss on the Corporation’s cash flow hedges is reported as a component of other comprehensive income, net of deferred income taxes, and reclassified into earnings in the same period(s) during which the hedged transactions affect earnings. The Corporation’s derivative financial instruments are described more fully in Note 10.

Share-Based Compensation: Shared-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures, for the first quarter of 2017 was $403,000 ($250,000 after tax) for restricted stock granted during 2012 through 2017. As of March 31, 2017, there was $3.20 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock that will be recognized over the remaining requisite service periods.

A summary of activity for restricted stock awards during the first three months of 2017 and 2016 is presented below:


	2017
		Weighted-
		Average
		Grant Date
	Shares	Fair Value
Unvested, December 31, 2016	141,755	$	39.77
Granted	15,275		45.40
Vested	(14,950)		34.73
Forfeited	(910)		41.58
Unvested, March 31, 2017	141,170	$	40.90


	2016
		Weighted-
		Average
		Grant Date
	Shares	Fair Value
Unvested, December 31, 2015	137,200	$	36.50
Granted	16,150		38.16
Vested	(7,350)		23.20
Forfeited	(300)		41.78
Unvested, March 31, 2016	145,700	$	37.34

Table of Contents

Stock option activity during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and stock options outstanding at March 31, 2017 and 2016 are summarized below. There was no stock option activity during the three months ended March 31, 2016.


					Intrinsic
					Value of
					Unexercised
				Remaining	In-The
				Contractual	Money
		Exercise		Life	Options
	Shares	Price*		(in years)*	(in 000’s)
Options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2016	2,250	$	37.17	0.3	$	29
Exercised	(2,250)		37.17
Options outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2017	—	$	—	—	$	—
Options outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2016	24,000	$	38.39	0.6	$	12

* Weighted average

Recent Significant Accounting Pronouncements:

In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” The amendments in ASU 2016-01 require, among other things, equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; and separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (i.e., securities or loans and receivables). It also eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Corporation is currently assessing the effect that ASU 2016-01 will have on its financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” Among other things, in the amendments in ASU 2016-02, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: (1) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and (2) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. Certain targeted improvements were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted upon issuance. Lessees (for capital and operating leases) and lessors (for sales-type, direct financing, and operating leases) must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The modified retrospective approach would not require any transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Lessees and lessors may not apply a full retrospective transition approach. The Corporation is currently assessing the effect that ASU 2016-02 will have on its financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-05, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships.” The amendments in this ASU clarify that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as the hedging instrument does not, in and of itself, require dedesignation of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria remain intact. The amendments became effective for public business entities for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of ASU 2016-05 did not have a material effect on the Corporation’s financial statements.

Table of Contents

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”, as part of its project on financial instruments. ASU 2016-13 introduces an approach based on expected losses to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments. It also modifies the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and provides for a simplified accounting model for purchased financial assets with credit deterioration since their origination. For public business entities that are SEC filers, the new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption will be permitted for all organizations for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Corporation is currently assessing the effect that ASU 2016-13 may have on its financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”, to address diversity in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. If retrospective application is impractical for some of the issues addressed by the update, the amendments for those issues would be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Corporation is currently assessing the effect that ASU 2016-15 may have on its financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory”, to eliminate the recognition exception for intra-entity asset transfers other than inventory so that an entity’s consolidated financial statements reflect the current and deferred tax consequences of those intra-entity transfers when they occur. ASU 2016-16 is effective for public business entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim reporting periods within those fiscal years. An entity may elect early adoption, but it must do so for the first interim period of an annual period if it issues interim financial statements. The amendments must be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment, including the effect of any resultant valuation allowance, to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Corporation is currently assessing the effect that ASU 2016-16 may have on its financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment”, which removes the requirement to compare the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount as part of step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. As a result, under ASU 2017-04, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. ASU 2017-04 is effective for public business entities that are SEC filers for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Corporation is currently assessing the effect that ASU 2017-04 may have on its financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715)”, which requires an employer to disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost. ASU 2017-07 provides explicit guidance on how to present the service cost component and the other components of net benefit cost in the income statement and allow only the service cost component of net benefit cost to be eligible for capitalization. ASU 2017-07 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Corporation is currently assessing the effect that ASU 2017-07 may have on its financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08, “Receivables – Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20)”, which requires all entities that hold investments in callable debt securities at a premium to amortize the premium to the earliest call date. ASU 2017-08 does not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount. ASU 2017-08 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Corporation is currently assessing the effect that ASU 2017-08 may have on its financial statements.

Table of Contents

Other accounting standards that have been issued by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies are not expected to have a material effect on the Corporation’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

NOTE 2: Securities

The Corporation’s debt and equity securities, all of which are classified as available for sale, at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are summarized as follows:


	March 31, 2017
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
U.S. government agencies and corporations	$	17,017	$	1	$	(346)	$	16,672
Mortgage-backed securities		82,914		203		(524)		82,593
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		110,711		3,328		(225)		113,814
	$	210,642	$	3,532	$	(1,095)	$	213,079


	December 31, 2016
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
U.S. government agencies and corporations	$	16,526	$	—	$	(414)	$	16,112
Mortgage-backed securities		77,210		228		(622)		76,816
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		114,157		3,265		(324)		117,098
	$	207,893	$	3,493	$	(1,360)	$	210,026

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities at March 31, 2017, by the earlier of contractual maturity or expected maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.


	March 31, 2017
	Amortized
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	29,291	$	29,397
Due after one year through five years		155,909		157,621
Due after five years through ten years		17,207		17,359
Due after ten years		8,235		8,702
	$	210,642	$	213,079

Proceeds from maturities, calls and sales, and payments on available for sale securities for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were $11.37 million and $12.22 million, respectively. Gross realized gains of $1,000 were recognized in each of the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

The Corporation pledges securities to primarily secure public deposits and repurchase agreements. Securities with an aggregate amortized cost of $106.36 million and an aggregate fair value of $107.49 million were pledged at March 31, 2017. Securities with an aggregate amortized cost of $113.07 million and an aggregate fair value of $114.16. million were pledged at December 31, 2016.

Table of Contents

Securities in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2017, by duration of the period of the unrealized loss, are shown below.


	Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Value		Loss		Value		Loss		Value		Loss
U.S. government agencies and corporations	$	16,169	$	346	$	—	$	—	$	16,169	$	346
Mortgage-backed securities		56,137		523		616		1		56,753		524
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		14,137		180		2,207		45		16,344		225
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	86,443	$	1,049	$	2,823	$	46	$	89,266	$	1,095

There were 132 debt securities totaling $89.27 million considered temporarily impaired at March 31, 2017. The primary cause of the temporary impairments in the Corporation's investments in debt securities was fluctuations in interest rates. At March 31, 2017, approximately 97 percent of the Corporation's obligations of states and political subdivisions, as measured by market value, were rated “A” or better by Standard & Poor's or Moody's Investors Service. Of those in a net unrealized loss position, approximately 97 percent were rated “A” or better, as measured by market value, at March 31, 2017. The Corporation considers all of its debt securities to meet regulatory credit quality standards, meaning that the securities have low risk of default by the obligor, and the full and timely repayment of principal and interest is expected over the expected life of the investment. Because the Corporation intends to hold these investments in debt securities to maturity and it is more likely than not that the Corporation will not be required to sell these investments before a recovery of unrealized losses, the Corporation does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2017 and no other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized.

Securities in an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2016, by duration of the period of the unrealized loss, are shown below.


	Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Value		Loss		Value		Loss		Value		Loss
U.S. government agencies and corporations	$	16,111	$	414	$	—	$	—	$	16,111	$	414
Mortgage-backed securities		54,227		621		671		1		54,898		622
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		21,835		283		1,891		41		23,726		324
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	92,173	$	1,318	$	2,562	$	42	$	94,735	$	1,360

The Corporation’s investment in restricted stocks totaled $3.44 million at March 31, 2017 and consisted of both Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock and Community Bankers Bank (CBB) stock. Restricted stocks are generally viewed as long-term investments, which are carried at cost because there is no market for the stock other than the FHLBs with respect to FHLB stock, or member institutions with respect to CBB stock. Therefore, when evaluating restricted stock for impairment, their respective values are based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. The Corporation does not consider its investment in restricted stocks to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2017 and no impairment has been recognized. Total restricted stocks is shown as a separate line item on the balance sheet and is not a part of the available for sale securities portfolio.

Table of Contents

NOTE 3: Loans

Major classifications of loans are summarized as follows:


	March 31,		December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2017		2016
Real estate – residential mortgage	$	189,769	$	188,264
Real estate – construction 1		50,693		55,732
Commercial, financial and agricultural 2		399,853		390,388
Equity lines		51,147		52,600
Consumer		11,004		8,399
Consumer finance		298,361		301,845
		1,000,827		997,228
Less allowance for loan losses		(36,734)		(37,066)
Loans, net	$	964,093	$	960,162

Includes the Corporation's real estate construction lending and consumer real estate lot lending.

Includes the Corporation’s commercial real estate lending, land acquisition and development lending, builder line lending and commercial business lending.

Consumer loans included $209,000 and $284,000 of demand deposit overdrafts at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

The outstanding principal balance and the carrying amount of loans acquired pursuant to the Corporation's acquisition of Central Virginia Bank (CVB) on October 1, 2013 (or acquired loans) that were recorded at fair value at the acquisition date and are included in the consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were as follows:


	March 31, 2017						December 31, 2016
	Acquired Loans -		Acquired Loans -				Acquired Loans -		Acquired Loans -
	Purchased		Purchased		Acquired Loans -		Purchased		Purchased		Acquired Loans -
(Dollars in thousands)	Credit Impaired		Performing		Total		Credit Impaired		Performing		Total
Outstanding principal balance	$	17,530	$	53,748	$	71,278	$	19,770	$	56,213	$	75,983
Carrying amount
Real estate – residential mortgage	$	1,207	$	13,192	$	14,399	$	1,219	$	13,422	$	14,641
Commercial, financial and agricultural1		5,922		27,333		33,255		7,759		28,615		36,374
Equity lines		280		10,398		10,678		278		11,178		11,456
Consumer		—		101		101		—		114		114
Total acquired loans	$	7,409	$	51,024	$	58,433	$	9,256	$	53,329	$	62,585

Includes acquired loans classified by the Corporation as commercial real estate lending, land acquisition and development lending, builder line lending and commercial business lending.

Table of Contents

Loans on nonaccrual status were as follows:


	March 31,		December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2017		2016
Real estate – residential mortgage	$	1,019	$	1,652
Real estate – construction		—		—
Commercial, financial and agricultural:
Commercial real estate lending		6,882		1,619
Commercial business lending		129		131
Equity lines		712		757
Consumer		2		118
Consumer finance		384		565
Total loans on nonaccrual status	$	9,128	$	4,842

The past due status of loans as of March 31, 2017 was as follows:


															90+ Days
	30 - 59 Days		60 - 89 Days		90+ Days		Total								Past Due and
(Dollars in thousands)	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		PCI		Current1		Total Loans		Accruing 2
Real estate – residential mortgage	$	1,279	$	95	$	319	$	1,693	$	1,207	$	186,869	$	189,769	$	194
Real estate – construction:
Construction lending		—		—		—		—		—		42,390		42,390		—
Consumer lot lending		—		—		—		—		—		8,303		8,303		—
Commercial, financial and agricultural:
Commercial real estate lending		65		1,916		455		2,436		5,922		268,165		276,523		455
Land acquisition and development lending		—		—		270		270		—		38,172		38,442		270
Builder line lending		—		—		367		367		—		25,749		26,116		367
Commercial business lending		15		—		—		15		—		58,757		58,772		—
Equity lines		444		—		120		564		280		50,303		51,147		120
Consumer		22		—		2		24		—		10,980		11,004		—
Consumer finance		7,774		780		384		8,938		—		289,423		298,361		—
Total	$	9,599	$	2,791	$	1,917	$	14,307	$	7,409	$	979,111	$	1,000,827	$	1,406

For the purposes of the table above, “Current” includes loans that are 1-29 days past due.

Includes purchased credit impaired (PCI) loans of $194,000.

The table above includes the following:

nonaccrual loans that are current of $6.30 million, 30-59 days past due of $379,000, 60-89 days past due of $1.94 million and 90+ days past due of $510,000.

performing loans purchased in the acquisition of CVB that are current of $48.74 million, 30-59 days past due of $389,000, and 60-89 days past due of $1.89 million.

Table of Contents

The past due status of loans as of December 31, 2016 was as follows:


															90+ Days
	30 - 59 Days		60 - 89 Days		90+ Days		Total								Past Due and
(Dollars in thousands)	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		PCI		Current1		Total Loans		Accruing
Real estate – residential mortgage	$	848	$	233	$	184	$	1,265	$	1,219	$	185,780	$	188,264	$	—
Real estate – construction:
Construction lending		—		—		—		—		—		47,062		47,062		—
Consumer lot lending		—		—		—		—		—		8,670		8,670		—
Commercial, financial and agricultural:
Commercial real estate lending		5,121		12		—		5,133		7,245		249,408		261,786		—
Land acquisition and development lending		—		—		—		—		—		43,472		43,472		—
Builder line lending		—		—		—		—		—		22,391		22,391		—
Commercial business lending		75		—		—		75		514		62,150		62,739		—
Equity lines		853		138		—		991		278		51,331		52,600		—
Consumer		22		—		118		140		—		8,259		8,399		6
Consumer finance		13,011		1,975		565		15,551		—		286,294		301,845		—
Total	$	19,930	$	2,358	$	867	$	23,155	$	9,256	$	964,817	$	997,228	$	6

For the purposes of the table above, “Current” includes loans that are 1-29 days past due.

The table above includes the following:

nonaccrual loans that are current of $3.04 million, 30-59 days past due of $570,000, 60‑89 days past due of $370,000 and 90+ days past due of $867,000.

performing loans purchased in the acquisition of CVB that are current of $52.64 million, 30-59 days past due of $532,000, 60-89 days past due of $143,000 and 90+ days past due of $17,000.

Loan modifications that were classified as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017					2016
		Pre-		Post-			Pre-		Post-
		Modification		Modification			Modification		Modification
	Number of	Recorded		Recorded		Number of	Recorded		Recorded
(Dollars in thousands)	Loans	Investment		Investment		Loans	Investment		Investment
Real estate – residential mortgage – interest rate concession	—	$	—	$	—	1	$	57	$	57
Commercial, financial and agricultural:
Commercial real estate lending – interest rate and term concession	3		4,646		4,646	—		—		—
Commercial real estate lending – interest rate concession	1		12		12	—		—		—
Commercial business lending – interest rate concession	—		—		—	1		100		100
Consumer – interest rate concession	—		—		—	1		291		291
Total	4	$	4,658	$	4,658	3	$	448	$	448

A TDR payment default occurs when, within 12 months of the original TDR modification, either a full or partial charge-off occurs or a TDR becomes 90 days or more past due. There were no TDR payment defaults during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

Table of Contents

Impaired loans, which included TDR loans of $10.10 million, and the related allowance at March 31, 2017 were as follows:



			Recorded		Recorded
			Investment		Investment				Average
	Unpaid		in Loans		in Loans				Balance-		Interest
	Principal		without		with		Related		Impaired		Income
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		Specific Reserve		Specific Reserve		Allowance		Loans		Recognized
Real estate – residential mortgage	$	3,597	$	1,935	$	1,615	$	313	$	3,561	$	46
Commercial, financial and agricultural:
Commercial real estate lending		8,021		489		7,430		855		7,979		19
Commercial business lending		133		63		66		38		134		1
Equity lines		32		—		30		30		32		—
Consumer		321		—		322		6		321		3
Total	$	12,104	$	2,487	$	9,463	$	1,242	$	12,027	$	69

Impaired loans, which consisted solely of TDRs, and the related allowance at December 31, 2016 were as follows:



			Recorded		Recorded
			Investment		Investment				Average
	Unpaid		in Loans		in Loans				Balance-		Interest
	Principal		without		with		Related		Impaired		Income
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		Specific Reserve		Specific Reserve		Allowance		Loans		Recognized
Real estate – residential mortgage	$	3,539	$	1,676	$	1,732	$	251	$	3,446	$	122
Commercial, financial and agricultural:
Commercial real estate lending		1,967		430		1,272		261		1,746		29
Commercial business lending		167		89		74		46		181		8
Equity lines		32		32		—		—		32		1
Consumer		520		—		520		94		521		8
Total	$	6,225	$	2,227	$	3,598	$	652	$	5,926	$	168

PCI loans had an unpaid principal balance of $17.53 million and a carrying value of $7.41 million at March 31, 2017. Determining the fair value of purchased credit impaired loans required the Corporation to estimate cash flows expected to result from those loans and to discount those cash flows at appropriate rates of interest. For such loans, the excess of the cash flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value is recognized as interest income over the remaining lives of the loans and is called the accretable yield. The difference between contractually required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition reflects the effect of estimated credit losses and is called the nonaccretable difference, and is not recorded. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, there was no carry-over of the previously established allowance for loan losses for acquired loans.

The following table presents a summary of the change in the accretable yield of the PCI loan portfolio for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:


	March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2017		2016
Accretable yield, balance at beginning of period	$	8,637	$	10,419
Accretion		(683)		(462)
Reclassification of nonaccretable difference due to improvement in expected cash flows		328		441
Other changes, net		(566)		(263)
Accretable yield, balance at end of period	$	7,716	$	10,135

Table of Contents

NOTE 4: Allowance for Loan Losses

The following table presents the changes in the allowance for loan losses by major classification during the three months ended March 31, 2017:


	Real Estate				Commercial,
	Residential		Real Estate		Financial &		Equity				Consumer
(Dollars in thousands)	Mortgage		Construction		Agricultural		Lines		Consumer		Finance		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	2,559	$	816	$	7,393	$	685	$	261	$	25,352	$	37,066
Provision charged (credited) to operations		(33)		(75)		259		27		(78)		4,300		4,400
Loans charged off		(5)		—		(153)		—		(62)		(5,678)		(5,898)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off		14		—		7		—		41		1,104		1,166
Balance at March 31, 2017	$	2,535	$	741	$	7,506	$	712	$	162	$	25,078	$	36,734

The following table presents the changes in the allowance for loan losses by major classification during the three months ended March 31, 2016:


	Real Estate				Commercial,
	Residential		Real Estate		Financial &		Equity				Consumer
(Dollars in thousands)	Mortgage		Construction		Agricultural		Lines		Consumer		Finance		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	2,471	$	94	$	7,755	$	1,052	$	243	$	23,954	$	35,569
Provision charged (credited) to operations		(10)		192		(226)		91		(47)		4,600		4,600
Loans charged off		—		—		(35)		(55)		(71)		(5,601)		(5,762)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off		26		—		160		—		127		1,118		1,431
Balance at March 31, 2016	$	2,487	$	286	$	7,654	$	1,088	$	252	$	24,071	$	35,838

The following table presents, as of March 31, 2017, the total allowance for loan losses, the allowance by impairment methodology, total loans and loans by impairment methodology.


	Real Estate				Commercial,
	Residential		Real Estate		Financial &		Equity				Consumer
(Dollars in thousands)	Mortgage		Construction		Agricultural		Lines		Consumer		Finance		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance at March 31, 2017	$	2,535	$	741	$	7,506	$	712	$	162	$	25,078	$	36,734
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	313	$	—	$	893	$	30	$	6	$	—	$	1,242
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	2,222	$	741	$	6,613	$	682	$	156	$	25,078	$	35,492
Ending balance: acquired loans - PCI	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Loans:
Balance at March 31, 2017	$	189,769	$	50,693	$	399,853	$	51,147	$	11,004	$	298,361	$	1,000,827
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,550	$	—	$	8,048	$	30	$	322	$	—	$	11,950
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	185,012	$	50,693	$	385,883	$	50,837	$	10,682	$	298,361	$	981,468
Ending balance: acquired loans - PCI	$	1,207	$	—	$	5,922	$	280	$	—	$	—	$	7,409

Table of Contents

The following table presents, as of December 31, 2016, the total allowance for loan losses, the allowance by impairment methodology, total loans and loans by impairment methodology.


	Real Estate				Commercial,
	Residential		Real Estate		Financial &		Equity				Consumer
(Dollars in thousands)	Mortgage		Construction		Agricultural		Lines		Consumer		Finance		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	2,559	$	816	$	7,393	$	685	$	261	$	25,352	$	37,066
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	251	$	—	$	307	$	—	$	94	$	—	$	652
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	2,308	$	816	$	7,086	$	685	$	167	$	25,352	$	36,414
Ending balance: acquired loans - PCI	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Loans:
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	188,264	$	55,732	$	390,388	$	52,600	$	8,399	$	301,845	$	997,228
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,408	$	—	$	1,865	$	32	$	520	$	—	$	5,825
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	183,637	$	55,732	$	380,764	$	52,290	$	7,879	$	301,845	$	982,147
Ending balance: acquired loans - PCI	$	1,219	$	—	$	7,759	$	278	$	—	$	—	$	9,256

Loans by credit quality indicators as of March 31, 2017 were as follows:


			Special				Substandard
(Dollars in thousands)	Pass		Mention		Substandard		Nonaccrual		Total1
Real estate – residential mortgage	$	183,451	$	1,925	$	3,374	$	1,019	$	189,769
Real estate – construction:
Construction lending		42,390		—		—		—		42,390
Consumer lot lending		8,303		—		—		—		8,303
Commercial, financial and agricultural:
Commercial real estate lending		262,419		3,479		3,743		6,882		276,523
Land acquisition and development lending		24,947		—		13,495		—		38,442
Builder line lending		25,749		—		367		—		26,116
Commercial business lending		58,016		224		403		129		58,772
Equity lines		49,729		528		178		712		51,147
Consumer		10,671		—		331		2		11,004
	$	665,675	$	6,156	$	21,891	$	8,744	$	702,466

At March 31, 2017, the Corporation did not have any loans classified as Doubtful or Loss.

Included in the table above are loans purchased in connection with the acquisition of CVB of $51.25 million pass rated, $2.22 million special mention, $2.89 million substandard and $2.08 million substandard nonaccrual.


			Non-
(Dollars in thousands)	Performing		Performing		Total
Consumer finance	$	297,977	$	384	$	298,361

Table of Contents

Loans by credit quality indicators as of December 31, 2016 were as follows:


			Special				Substandard
(Dollars in thousands)	Pass		Mention		Substandard		Nonaccrual		Total1
Real estate – residential mortgage	$	181,814	$	2,037	$	2,761	$	1,652	$	188,264
Real estate – construction:
Construction lending		47,062		—		—		—		47,062
Consumer lot lending		8,670		—		—		—		8,670
Commercial, financial and agricultural:
Commercial real estate lending		243,427		5,860		10,880		1,619		261,786
Land acquisition and development lending		29,595		565		13,312		—		43,472
Builder line lending		21,235		789		367		—		22,391
Commercial business lending		62,044		255		309		131		62,739
Equity lines		51,186		480		177		757		52,600
Consumer		7,870		2		409		118		8,399
	$	652,903	$	9,988	$	28,215	$	4,277	$	695,383

At December 31, 2016, the Corporation did not have any loans classified as Doubtful or Loss.

Included in the table above are loans purchased in connection with the acquisition of CVB of $54.06 million pass rated, $2.59 million special mention, $5.74 million substandard and $196,000 substandard nonaccrual.


			Non-
(Dollars in thousands)	Performing		Performing		Total
Consumer finance	$	301,280	$	565	$	301,845

NOTE 5: Shareholders’ Equity and Earnings Per Common Share

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table presents the cumulative balances of the components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of deferred taxes of $393,000 and $534,000 as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.


	March 31,		December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2017		2016
Net unrealized gains on securities	$	1,584	$	1,386
Net unrecognized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges		6		(34)
Net unrecognized losses on defined benefit plan		(2,321)		(2,336)
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(731)	$	(984)

Common Shares

The Corporation purchased 4,049 and 3,525 shares of its common stock from employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations arising upon the vesting of restricted shares during the first three months of 2017 and 2016, respectively. During the first three months of 2017 and 2016, no shares were purchased under the share repurchase program authorized by the Corporation’s Board of Directors.

Table of Contents

Earnings Per Common Share (EPS)

The components of the Corporation’s EPS calculations are as follows:


	Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2017		2016
Net income	$	2,731	$	2,484

Weighted average number of common shares used in earnings per common share—basic		3,483,007		3,448,630
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock option awards		316		1,109
Weighted average number of common shares used in earnings per common share—assuming dilution		3,483,323		3,449,739

The Corporation has applied the two-class method of computing basic and diluted EPS for each period presented because the Corporation’s unvested restricted shares outstanding contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends. Accordingly, the weighted average number of common shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted EPS includes both vested and unvested common shares outstanding.

Potential common shares that may be issued by the Corporation for its stock option awards are determined using the treasury stock method. Accordingly, anti-dilutive shares are not included in computing diluted earnings per share. No shares issuable upon exercise of options were anti-dilutive for the three months ended March 31, 2017; whereas, 12,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options were anti-dilutive for the three months ended March 31, 2016.

NOTE 6: Employee Benefit Plans

The Bank has a non-contributory cash balance pension plan for which the components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows:


	Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2017		2016
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost	$	282	$	262
Interest cost		138		130
Expected return on plan assets		(287)		(261)
Amortization of prior service cost		(15)		(15)
Recognized net actuarial loss		38		38
Net periodic benefit cost	$	156	$	154

NOTE 7: Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. U.S. GAAP requires that valuation techniques maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. U.S. GAAP also establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the valuation inputs into three broad levels. Based on the underlying inputs, each fair value measurement in its entirety is reported in one of the three levels. These levels are:

Level 1—Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets. Level 1 assets and liabilities include debt and equity securities traded in an active exchange market, as well as U.S. Treasury securities.

Table of Contents

Level 2—Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3—Valuation is determined using model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect the Corporation's estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the respective asset or liability. Valuation techniques may include the use of pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

U.S. GAAP allows an entity the irrevocable option to elect fair value (the fair value option) for the initial and subsequent measurement for certain financial assets and liabilities on a contract-by-contract basis. The Corporation has elected to use fair value accounting for its entire portfolio of loans held for sale (LHFS).

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following describes the valuation techniques and inputs used by the Corporation in determining the fair value of certain assets recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the financial statements.

Securities available for sale. The Corporation primarily values its investment portfolio using Level 2 fair value measurements, but may also use Level 1 or Level 3 measurements if required by the composition of the portfolio. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Corporation's entire investment securities portfolio was comprised of securities available for sale, which were valued using Level 2 fair value measurements. The Corporation has contracted with third party portfolio accounting service vendors for valuation of its securities portfolio. The vendors’ sources for security valuation are Standard & Poor's Securities Evaluations Inc. (SPSE), Thomson Reuters Pricing Service (TRPS), and Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data LLC (IDC). Each source provides opinions, known as evaluated prices, as to the value of individual securities based on model-based pricing techniques that are partially based on available market data, including prices for similar instruments in active markets and prices for identical assets in markets that are not active. SPSE and IDC provide evaluated prices for the Corporation's obligations of states and political subdivisions category of securities. Both sources use proprietary pricing models and pricing systems, mathematical tools and judgment to determine an evaluated price for a security based upon a hierarchy of market information regarding that security or securities with similar characteristics. TRPS and IDC provide evaluated prices for the Corporation's U.S. government agencies and corporations and mortgage-backed categories of securities. Fixed-rate callable securities of the U.S. government agencies and corporations category are individually evaluated on an option adjusted spread basis for callable issues or on a nominal spread basis incorporating the term structure of agency market spreads and the appropriate risk free benchmark curve for non-callable issues. Fixed-rate securities issued by the Small Business Association in the U.S. government agencies and corporations category are individually evaluated based upon a hierarchy of security specific information and market data regarding that security or securities with similar characteristics. Pass-through mortgage-backed securities (MBS) in the mortgage-backed category are grouped into aggregate categories defined by issuer program, weighted average coupon, and weighted average maturity. Each aggregate is benchmarked to a relative mortgage-backed to-be-announced (TBA) or other benchmark price. TBA prices are obtained from market makers and live trading systems. Collateralized mortgage obligations in the mortgage-backed category are individually evaluated based upon a hierarchy of security specific information and market data regarding that security or securities with similar characteristics. Each evaluation is determined using an option adjusted spread and prepayment model based on volatility-driven, multi-dimensional spread tables.

Loans held for sale. Fair value of the Corporation’s LHFS is based on observable market prices for similar instruments traded in the secondary mortgage loan markets in which the Corporation conducts business. The Corporation's portfolio of LHFS is classified as Level 2.

Derivative asset (liability) - IRLCs. The Corporation recognizes IRLCs at fair value. Fair value of IRLCs is based on either (i) the price of the underlying loans obtained from an investor for loans that will be delivered on a best efforts basis or (ii) the observable price for individual loans traded in the secondary market for loans that will be delivered on a mandatory basis. All of the Corporation's IRLCs are classified as Level 2.

Table of Contents

Derivative asset (liability) – interest rate swaps on loans. As discussed in “Note 10: Derivative Financial Instruments”, the Corporation recognizes interest rate swaps at fair value on a recurring basis. The Corporation has contracted with a third party vendor to provide valuations for these interest rate swaps using standard valuation techniques and therefore classifies such interest rate swaps as Level 2.

Derivative asset (liability) - cash flow hedges. The fair value of the Corporation’s cash flow hedges is determined using the discounted cash flow method. All of the Corporation’s cash flow hedges are classified as Level 2.

The following table presents the balances of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.


	March 31, 2017
	Fair Value Measurements Using						Assets/Liabilities at
(Dollars in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair Value
Assets:
Securities available for sale
U.S. government agencies and corporations	$	—	$	16,672	$	—	$	16,672
Mortgage-backed securities		—		82,593		—		82,593
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		—		113,814		—		113,814
Total securities available for sale		—		213,079		—		213,079
Loans held for sale		—		41,277		—		41,277
Derivative asset - IRLC		—		1,394		—		1,394
Derivative asset - interest rate swaps on loans		—		1,061		—		1,061
Derivative asset - cash flow hedges		—		21		—		21
Total assets	$	—	$	256,832	$	—	$	256,832

Liabilities:
Derivative liability - cash flow hedges	$	—	$	11	$	—	$	11
Derivative liability - interest rate swaps on loans		—		1,061		—		1,061
Total liabilities	$	—	$	1,072	$	—	$	1,072


	December 31, 2016
	Fair Value Measurements Using						Assets/Liabilities at
(Dollars in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair Value
Assets:
Securities available for sale
U.S. government agencies and corporations	$	—	$	16,112	$	—	$	16,112
Mortgage-backed securities		—		76,816		—		76,816
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		—		117,098		—		117,098
Total securities available for sale		—		210,026		—		210,026
Loans held for sale		—		52,027		—		52,027
Derivative asset - IRLC		—		663		—		663
Derivative asset - interest rate swaps on loans		—		1,032		—		1,032
Total assets	$	—	$	263,748	$	—	$	263,748

Liabilities:
Derivative liability - cash flow hedges	$	—	$	56	$	—	$	56
Derivative liability - interest rate swaps on loans		—		1,032		—		1,032
Total liabilities	$	—	$	1,088	$	—	$	1,088

Table of Contents

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The Corporation may be required, from time to time, to measure and recognize certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U. S. GAAP. The following describes the valuation techniques and inputs used by the Corporation in determining the fair value of certain assets recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the financial statements.

Impaired loans. The Corporation does not record loans held for investment at fair value on a recurring basis. However, there are instances when a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect all interest and principal payments as scheduled in the loan agreement. All TDRs are considered impaired loans. The Corporation measures impairment on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial, construction and residential loans in excess of $500,000 by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Additionally, management reviews current market conditions, borrower history, past experience with similar loans and economic conditions. Based on management’s review, additional write-downs to fair value may be incurred. The Corporation maintains a valuation allowance to the extent that the measure of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment. When the fair value of an impaired loan is based solely on observable cash flows, market price or a current appraisal, the Corporation records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 2. However, if based on management’s review, additional write-downs to fair value are required or if the impaired loan otherwise does not meet the standards for Level 2 classification, the Corporation records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3.

The measurement of impaired loans of less than $500,000, with the exception of Commercial loan TDRs, is based on each loan’s future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate rather than the market rate of interest, which is not a fair value measurement and is therefore excluded from fair value disclosure requirements.

Other real estate owned (OREO). Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell at the date of foreclosure. Initial fair value is based upon appraisals the Corporation obtains from independent licensed appraisers. Subsequent to foreclosure, management periodically performs valuations of the foreclosed assets based on updated appraisals, general market conditions, recent sales of similar properties, length of time the properties have been held, and our ability and intent with regard to continued ownership of the properties. The Corporation may incur additional write-downs of foreclosed assets to fair value less costs to sell if valuations indicate a further deterioration in market conditions. As such, the Corporation records OREO as nonrecurring Level 3.

The following table presents the balances of financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.


	March 31, 2017
	Fair Value Measurements Using						Assets at Fair
(Dollars in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Value
Impaired loans, net	$	—	$	—	$	4,609	$	4,609
Other real estate owned, net		—		—		376		376
Total	$	—	$	—	$	4,985	$	4,985


	December 31, 2016
	Fair Value Measurements Using						Assets at Fair
(Dollars in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Value
Impaired loans, net	$	—	$	—	$	2,303	$	2,303
Other real estate owned, net		—		—		195		195
Total	$	—	$	—	$	2,498	$	2,498

Table of Contents

The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of March 31, 2017:


	Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2017
(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Valuation Technique(s)	Unobservable Inputs	Range of Inputs
Impaired loans, net	$	4,609	Appraisals	Discount to reflect current market conditions and estimated selling costs	5% - 20%
Other real estate owned, net		376	Appraisals	Discount to reflect current market conditions and estimated selling costs	15% - 28%
Total	$	4,985

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

FASB ASC 825, Financial Instruments, requires disclosure about fair value of financial instruments, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not required to be measured and reported at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis. ASC 825 excludes certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Corporation.

The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Corporation to measure certain of its financial instruments at fair value as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

Cash and short-term investments. The nature of these instruments and their relatively short maturities provide for the reporting of fair value equal to the historical cost.

Loans, net. The fair value of performing loans is estimated using a discounted expected future cash flows analysis based on current rates being offered on similar products in the market. An overall valuation adjustment is made for specific credit risks as well as general portfolio risks. Based on the valuation methodologies used in assessing the fair value of loans and the associated valuation allowance, these loans are considered Level 3.

Loan totals, as listed in the table below, include impaired loans. For valuation techniques used in relation to impaired loans, see the “Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis” section in this Note 7.

Loans held for sale, net. As described in the “Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis” section in this Note 7, the Corporation has elected to carry its portfolio of loans held for sale at fair value, measured on a recurring basis.

Accrued interest receivable. The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates fair value.

Bank-owned life insurance (BOLI). The fair value of BOLI is estimated using information provided by insurance carriers. These policies are carried at their cash surrender value, which approximates the fair value.

Deposits. The fair value of all demand deposit accounts is the amount payable at the report date. For all other deposits, the fair value is determined using the discounted cash flow method. The discount rate was equal to the rate currently offered on similar products in active markets (Level 2).

Borrowings. The fair value of borrowings is determined using the discounted cash flow method. The discount rate was equal to the rate currently offered on similar products in active markets (Level 2).

Accrued interest payable. The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates fair value.

Table of Contents

Letters of credit. The estimated fair value of letters of credit is based on estimated fees the Corporation would pay to have another entity assume its obligation under the outstanding arrangements. These fees are not considered material.

Unused portions of lines of credit. The estimated fair value of unused portions of lines of credit is based on estimated fees the Corporation would pay to have another entity assume its obligation under the outstanding arrangements. These fees are not considered material.

The following tables reflect the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Corporation’s financial instruments whether or not recognized on the balance sheet at fair value.


	Carrying		Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2017 Using						Total Fair
(Dollars in thousands)	Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Value
Financial assets:
Cash and short-term investments	$	120,538	$	120,538	$	—	$	—	$	120,538
Securities available for sale		213,079		—		213,079		—		213,079
Loans, net		964,093		—		—		963,494		963,494
Loans held for sale		41,277		—		41,277		—		41,277
Derivative asset - IRLC		1,394		—		1,394		—		1,394
Derivative asset - interest rate swaps on loans		1,061		—		1,061		—		1,061
Derivative asset - cash flow hedges		21		—		21		—		21
Bank-owned life insurance		15,201		—		15,201		—		15,201
Accrued interest receivable		6,765		6,765		—		—		6,765
Financial liabilities:
Demand deposits	$	786,854	$	786,854	$	—	$	—	$	786,854
Time deposits		345,670		—		348,053		—		348,053
Borrowings		165,773		—		158,321		—		158,321
Derivative liability - cash flow hedges		11		—		11		—		11
Derivative liability - interest rate swaps on loans		1,061		—		1,061		—		1,061
Accrued interest payable		708		708		—		—		708


	Carrying		Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 Using						Total Fair
(Dollars in thousands)	Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Value
Financial assets:
Cash and short-term investments	$	103,201	$	103,201	$	—	$	—	$	103,201
Securities available for sale		210,026		—		210,026		—		210,026
Loans, net		960,162		—		—		961,546		961,546
Loans held for sale		52,027		—		52,027		—		52,027
Derivative asset - IRLC		663		—		663		—		663
Derivative asset - interest rate swaps on loans		1,032		—		1,032		—		1,032
Bank-owned life insurance		15,103		—		15,103		—		15,103
Accrued interest receivable		7,261		7,261		—		—		7,261
Financial liabilities:
Demand deposits	$	775,506	$	775,506	$	—	$	—	$	775,506
Time deposits		344,415		—		346,648		—		346,648
Borrowings		164,567		—		157,138		—		157,138
Derivative liability - cash flow hedges		56		—		56		—		56
Derivative liability - interest rate swaps on loans		1,032		—		1,032		—		1,032
Accrued interest payable		703		703		—		—		703

Table of Contents

The Corporation assumes interest rate risk (the risk that general interest rate levels will change) in the normal course of operations. As a result, the fair values of the Corporation’s financial instruments will change when interest rate levels change and that change may be either favorable or unfavorable to the Corporation. Management attempts to match maturities of assets and liabilities to the extent believed necessary to balance minimizing interest rate risk and increasing net interest income in current market conditions. However, borrowers with fixed rate obligations are less likely to prepay in a rising rate environment and more likely to prepay in a falling rate environment. Conversely, depositors who are receiving fixed rates are more likely to withdraw funds before maturity in a rising rate environment and less likely to do so in a falling rate environment. Management monitors interest rates, maturities and repricing dates of assets and liabilities and attempts to manage interest rate risk by adjusting terms of new loans, deposits and borrowings and by investing in securities with terms that mitigate the Corporation’s overall interest rate risk.

NOTE 8: Business Segments

The Corporation operates in a decentralized fashion in three principal business segments: Retail Banking, Mortgage Banking and Consumer Finance. Revenues from Retail Banking operations consist primarily of interest earned on loans and investment securities and service charges on deposit accounts. Mortgage Banking operating revenues consist principally of gains on sales of loans in the secondary market, loan origination fee income and interest earned on mortgage loans held for sale. Revenues from Consumer Finance consist primarily of interest earned on purchased automobile retail installment sales contracts.

The Corporation’s other segment includes a full-service brokerage firm that derives revenues from offering wealth management services and insurance products through an alliance with an independent broker/dealer and an insurance company that derives revenues from owning an equity interest in an insurance agency that offers insurance products and services. The results of the other segment are not significant to the Corporation as a whole and have been included in “Other.” Revenue and expenses of the Corporation are also included in “Other,” and consist primarily of interest expense associated with the Corporation’s trust preferred capital notes and other general corporate expenses.


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
	Retail		Mortgage		Consumer
(Dollars in thousands)	Banking		Banking		Finance		Other		Eliminations		Consolidated
Revenues:
Interest income	$	11,972	$	316	$	11,206	$	—	$	(1,473)	$	22,021
Gains on sales of loans		—		1,943		—		—		—		1,943
Other noninterest income		2,500		1,087		232		384		—		4,203
Total operating income		14,472		3,346		11,438		384		(1,473)		28,167
Expenses:
Provision for loan losses		100		—		4,300		—		—		4,400
Interest expense		1,465		88		1,907		283		(1,473)		2,270
Salaries and employee benefits		6,235		1,483		2,412		539		—		10,669
Other noninterest expenses		4,443		1,279		1,253		201		—		7,176
Total operating expenses		12,243		2,850		9,872		1,023		(1,473)		24,515
Income (loss) before income taxes		2,229		496		1,566		(639)		—		3,652
Income tax expense (benefit)		407		199		624		(309)		—		921
Net income (loss)	$	1,822	$	297	$	942	$	(330)	$	—	$	2,731
Total assets	$	1,305,717	$	56,178	$	301,506	$	5,873	$	(204,810)	$	1,464,464
Goodwill	$	3,702	$	—	$	10,723	$	—	$	—	$	14,425
Capital expenditures	$	379	$	194	$	13	$	11	$	—	$	597

Table of Contents


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
	Retail		Mortgage		Consumer
(Dollars in thousands)	Banking		Banking		Finance		Other		Eliminations		Consolidated
Revenues:
Interest income	$	11,083	$	310	$	11,811	$	1	$	(1,240)	$	21,965
Gains on sales of loans		—		1,730		—		—		—		1,730
Other noninterest income		2,162		743		232		296		—		3,433
Total operating income		13,245		2,783		12,043		297		(1,240)		27,128
Expenses:
Provision for loan losses		—		—		4,600		—		—		4,600
Interest expense		1,454		62		1,703		283		(1,240)		2,262
Salaries and employee benefits		6,008		1,184		2,627		352		—		10,171
Other noninterest expenses		4,432		1,001		1,328		158		—		6,919
Total operating expenses		11,894		2,247		10,258		793		(1,240)		23,952
Income (loss) before income taxes		1,351		536		1,785		(496)		—		3,176
Income tax expense (benefit)		22		214		703		(247)		—		692
Net income (loss)	$	1,329	$	322	$	1,082	$	(249)	$	—	$	2,484
Total assets	$	1,237,374	$	39,924	$	292,075	$	5,186	$	(169,735)	$	1,404,824
Goodwill	$	3,702	$	—	$	10,723	$	—	$	—	$	14,425
Capital expenditures	$	297	$	169	$	147	$	—	$	—	$	613

The Retail Banking segment extends a warehouse line of credit to the Mortgage Banking segment, providing a portion of the funds needed to originate mortgage loans. The Retail Banking segment charges the Mortgage Banking segment interest at the daily FHLB advance rate plus 50 basis points. The Retail Banking segment also provides the Consumer Finance segment with a portion of the funds needed to purchase loan contracts by means of variable rate notes that carry interest at one-month LIBOR plus 200 basis points and fixed rate notes that carry interest rates ranging from 3.8 percent to 8.0 percent. The Retail Banking segment acquires certain residential real estate loans from the Mortgage Banking segment at prices similar to those paid by third-party investors. These transactions are eliminated to reach consolidated totals. Certain corporate overhead costs incurred by the Retail Banking segment are not allocated to the Mortgage Banking, Consumer Finance and Other segments.

NOTE 9: Commitments and Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk

C&F Mortgage sells substantially all of the residential mortgage loans it originates to third-party counterparties (i.e., investors). As is customary in the industry, the agreements with these counterparties require C&F Mortgage to extend representations and warranties with respect to program compliance, borrower misrepresentation, fraud, and early payment performance. Under the agreements, the counterparties are entitled to make loss claims and repurchase requests of C&F Mortgage for loans that contain covered deficiencies. C&F Mortgage has obtained early payment default recourse waivers for a significant portion of its business. Recourse periods for early payment default for the remaining counterparties vary from 90 days up to one year. Recourse periods for borrower misrepresentation or fraud or underwriting error do not have a stated time limit. C&F Mortgage maintains an indemnification reserve for potential claims made under these recourse provisions. C&F Mortgage has adopted a reserve methodology whereby provisions are made to an expense account to fund a reserve maintained as a liability account on the balance sheet for potential losses. The loan performance data of sold loans is not made available to C&F Mortgage by the counterparties making the evaluation of potential losses inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. A schedule of expected losses on loans with claims or indemnifications is maintained to ensure the reserve is adequate to cover estimated losses. Often times, claims are not factually validated and they are rescinded. Once claims are validated and the actual or potential loss is agreed upon with the counterparties, the reserve is charged and a cash payment is made

Table of Contents

to settle the claim. The following table presents the changes in the allowance for indemnification losses for the periods presented:


	Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2017		2016
Allowance, beginning of period	$	2,303	$	2,363
Provision for indemnification losses		36		52
Payments		—		—
Allowance, end of period	$	2,339	$	2,415

NOTE 10: Derivative Financial Instruments

The Corporation uses derivative financial instruments (or derivatives) primarily to manage risks to the Corporation associated with changing interest rates, and to assist customers with their risk management objectives. The Corporation designates certain derivatives as hedging instruments in a qualifying hedge accounting relationship (cash flow or fair value hedge). The remaining derivatives are classified as free standing derivatives consisting of customer accommodation loan swaps (or loan swaps) and interest rate lock commitments.

Cash flow hedges. The Corporation designates derivatives as cash flow hedges when they are used to manage exposure to variability in cash flows on variable rate borrowings such as the Corporation’s trust preferred capital notes. The Corporation uses interest rate swap agreements as part of its hedging strategy by exchanging variable-rate interest payments on a notional amount equal to the principal amount of the borrowings for fixed-rate interest payments, with such interest rates set based on benchmarked interest rates.

All interest rate swaps were entered into with counterparties that met the Corporation’s credit standards and the agreements contain collateral provisions protecting the at-risk party. The Corporation believes that the credit risk inherent in these derivative contracts is not significant.

The terms and conditions of the interest rate swaps vary and amounts receivable or payable are recognized as accrued under the terms of the agreements. The Corporation assesses the effectiveness of each hedging relationship on a periodic basis. In accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, the effective portions of the derivatives’ unrealized gains or losses are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income. Based on the Corporation’s assessment its cash flow hedges are highly effective, but to the extent that any ineffectiveness exists in the hedge relationships, the amounts would be recorded in interest income and interest expense in the Corporation’s consolidated statements of income.

Loan swaps. The Bank also enters into interest rate swaps with certain qualifying commercial loan customers to meet their interest rate risk management needs. The Bank simultaneously enters into interest rate swaps with dealer counterparties, with identical notional amounts and terms. The net result of these interest rate swaps is that the customer pays a fixed rate of interest and the Corporation receives a floating rate. These back-to-back loan swaps qualify as financial derivatives with fair values reported in “Other Assets” and “Other Liabilities”. Changes in fair value are recorded in other noninterest expense and net to zero because of the identical amounts and terms of the swaps.

Interest rate lock commitments. C&F Mortgage enters into IRLCs with customers to originate loans for which the interest rates are determined prior to funding. C&F Mortgage then mitigates interest rate risk on these IRLCs and loans held for sale by (a) entering into forward loan sales contracts with investors for loans to be delivered on a best efforts basis or (b) entering into forward sales contracts of mortgage backed securities for loans to be delivered on a mandatory basis. At March 31, 2017, each loan held for sale by C&F Mortgage was subject to a forward sales agreement on a best efforts basis. The fair value of these derivative instruments is reported in “Other Assets.

Table of Contents

The following tables summarize key elements of the Corporation’s derivative instruments as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, segregated by derivatives that are considered to be hedging instruments and those that are not:


	March 31, 2017
	Notional								Collateral
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount1		Positions		Assets2		Liabilities2		Pledged3
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate swaps:
Pay variable rate swaps with counterparty	$	25,000		3	$	21	$	11	$	324
Not designated as hedges:
Customer-related interest rate contracts:
Matched interest rate swaps with borrower		25,048		4		—		1,061		—
Matched interest rate swaps with counterparty		25,048		4		1,061		—		—
Other contracts:
Interest rate lock commitments		134,822		608		1,394		—		—
Total		184,918		616		2,455		1,061		—
Total derivatives	$	209,918		619	$	2,476	$	1,072	$	324

Notional amounts are not recorded on the balance sheet and are generally used only as a basis on which interest and other payments are determined.

Balances represent fair value of derivative financial instruments.

Collateral pledged may be comprised of cash or securities.


	December 31, 2016
	Notional								Collateral
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount1		Positions		Assets2		Liabilities2		Pledged3
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate swaps:
Pay variable rate swaps with counterparty	$	25,000		3	$	—	$	56	$	323
Not designated as hedges:
Customer-related interest rate contracts:
Matched interest rate swaps with borrower		25,151		4		—		1,032		—
Matched interest rate swaps with counterparty		25,151		4		1,032		—		—
Other contracts:
Interest rate lock commitments		106,612		504		663		—		—
Total		156,914		512		1,695		1,032		—
Total derivatives	$	181,914		515	$	1,695	$	1,088	$	323

Notional amounts are not recorded on the balance sheet and are generally used only as a basis on which interest and other payments are determined.

Balances represent fair value of derivative financial instruments.

Collateral pledged may be comprised of cash or securities.

Table of Contents

NOTE 11: Other Noninterest Expenses

The following table presents the significant components in the statements of income line “Noninterest Expenses-Other.”


	Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2017		2016
Data processing expenses	$	858	$	955
Professional fees		706		511
Marketing and advertising expenses		365		376
Travel and educational expenses		286		273
Telecommunication expenses		330		234
Amortization of core deposit intangible		150		206
All other noninterest expenses		1,860		2,030
Total other noninterest expenses	$	4,555	$	4,585

Table of Contents

ITEM 2.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains statements concerning the Corporation’s expectations, plans, objectives, future financial performance and other statements that are not historical facts. These statements may constitute “forward-looking statements” as defined by federal securities laws and may include, but are not limited to, statements regarding future financial performance, liquidity, strategic business initiatives including personnel additions, expansion into new markets, development of our digitial platform and the utilization of scorecard models, capital levels, the effect of future market and industry trends including competitive trends in the nonprime consumer finance markets, the Corporation’s and each business segment’s loan portfolio and business prospects related to each segment’s loan portfolio, asset quality and adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and the level of future charge-offs, trends regarding the provision for loan losses, trends regarding net loan charge-offs, trends with respect to the levels of nonperforming assets and troubled debt restructurings and expenses associated with nonperforming assets, and the effects of future interest rate levels and fluctuations, the amount and timing of accretion associated with the fair value accounting adjustments recorded in connection with the 2013 acquisition of Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc. (CVBK), adequacy of the allowance for indemnification losses, levels of noninterest income and expense, interest rates and yields including possible future rising interest rate environments, the deposit portfolio including trends in deposit maturities and rates, interest rate sensitivity, market risk, regulatory developments, monetary policy implemented by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve Board) including changes to the federal funds rate, capital requirements, growth strategy, hedging strategy and financial and other goals. These statements may address issues that involve estimates and assumptions made by management and risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from historical results or those anticipated or implied by such statements. Factors that could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects of the Corporation include, but are not limited to, changes in:

interest rates, such as volatility in yields on U.S. Treasury bonds and increases or volatility in mortgage rates

general business conditions, as well as conditions within the financial markets

general economic conditions, including unemployment levels

the legislative/regulatory climate, including the Dodd-Frank Act and regulations promulgated thereunder, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the regulatory and enforcement activities of the CFPB and the application of the Basel III capital standards to the Corporation and the Bank

monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board, and the effect of these policies on interest rates and business in our markets

the value of securities held in the Corporation’s investment portfolios

demand for loan products

the quality or composition of the loan portfolios and the value of the collateral securing those loans

the commercial and residential real estate markets

the inventory level and pricing of used automobiles, including sales prices of repossessed vehicles

the level of net charge-offs on loans and the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses

deposit flows

Table of Contents

demand in the secondary residential mortgage loan markets

the level of indemnification losses related to mortgage loans sold

the strength of the Corporation’s counterparties and the economy in general

competition from both banks and non-banks, including competition in the non-prime automobile finance markets

demand for financial services in the Corporation’s market area

the Corporation's expansion and technology initiatives

reliance on third parties for key services

accounting principles, policies and guidelines and elections made by the Corporation thereunder

These risks and uncertainties, and the risks discussed in more detail in Item 1A, "Risk Factors", of the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements contained herein. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on those statements, which speak only as of the date of this report.

The following discussion supplements and provides information about the major components of the results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and capital resources of the Corporation. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions. Those accounting policies with the greatest uncertainty and that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments affecting the application of these policies, and the likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions, or using different assumptions, are described below.

Allowance for Loan Losses: We establish the allowance for loan losses through charges to earnings in the form of a provision for loan losses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when we believe that the collection of the principal is unlikely. Subsequent recoveries of losses previously charged against the allowance are credited to the allowance. The allowance represents an amount that, in our judgment, will be adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Our judgment in determining the level of the allowance is based on evaluations of the collectibility of loans while taking into consideration such factors as trends in delinquencies and charge-offs for relevant periods of time, changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions that may affect a borrower’s ability to repay and the value of collateral, overall portfolio quality and review of specific potential losses. This evaluation is inherently subjective because it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. For more information see the section titled “Asset Quality” within Part I, Item 2.

Allowance for Indemnifications: The allowance for indemnifications is established through charges to earnings in the form of a provision for indemnifications, which is included in other noninterest expenses. A loss is charged against the allowance for indemnifications when a purchaser of a loan (investor) sold by C&F Mortgage incurs a validated indemnified loss due to borrower misrepresentation, fraud, early default, or underwriting error. The allowance represents an amount that, in management’s judgment, will be adequate to absorb any losses arising from valid indemnification requests. Management’s judgment in determining the level of the allowance is based on the volume of loans sold, historical experience, current economic conditions and information provided by investors. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

Table of Contents

Impairment of Loans: We consider a loan impaired when it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect all interest and principal payments as scheduled in the loan agreement. We do not consider a loan impaired during a period of delay in payment if we expect the ultimate collection of all amounts due. We measure impairment on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial, construction and residential loans in excess of $500,000 by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. We maintain a valuation allowance to the extent that the measure of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment. TDRs are also considered impaired loans, even if the loan balance is less than $500,000. A TDR occurs when we agree to significantly modify the original terms of a loan by granting a concession due to the deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower.

Loans Acquired in a Business Combination: Loans acquired in the acquisition of CVBK and its subsidiary CVB were segregated between (i) PCI loans and (ii) purchased performing loans and were recorded at estimated fair value on the date of acquisition without the carryover of the related allowance for loan losses.

PCI loans are those for which there is evidence of credit deterioration since origination and for which it is probable at the date of acquisition that the Corporation will not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments. When determining fair value, PCI loans were aggregated into pools of loans based on common risk characteristics as of the date of acquisition such as loan type, date of origination, and evidence of credit quality deterioration such as internal risk grades and past due and nonaccrual status. The difference between contractually required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is referred to as the "nonaccretable difference," is not recorded and is available to absorb future credit losses on those loans. Any excess of cash flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value is referred to as the "accretable yield" and is recognized as interest income over the remaining life of the loan when there is a reasonable expectation about the amount and timing of such cash flows.

Subsequent to acquisition, we evaluate on a quarterly basis our estimate of cash flows expected to be collected. Estimates of cash flows for PCI loans require significant judgment. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows will generally result in a provision for loan losses resulting in an increase to the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent significant increases in cash flows may result in a reversal of post-acquisition provision for loan losses or a transfer from nonaccretable difference to accretable yield that increases interest income over the remaining life of the loan, or pool(s) of loans. Disposals of loans, which may include sale of loans to third parties, receipt of payments in full or in part from the borrower or foreclosure of the collateral, result in removal of the loan from the PCI loan portfolio at its carrying amount.

The Corporation's PCI loans currently consist of loans acquired in connection with the acquisition of CVB. PCI loans that were classified as nonperforming loans by CVB are no longer classified as nonperforming so long as, at acquisition and quarterly re-estimation periods, we believe we will fully collect the new carrying value of the pools of loans.

The Corporation accounts for purchased performing loans using the contractual cash flows method of recognizing discount accretion based on the acquired loans' contractual cash flows. Purchased performing loans are recorded at fair value, including a credit discount. The fair value discount is accreted as an adjustment to yield over the estimated lives of the loans. Because there is no allowance for loan losses established at the acquisition date, a provision for loan losses may be required in future periods for any deterioration in these loans subsequent to the acquisition.

Impairment of Securities: Impairment of securities occurs when the fair value of a security is less than its amortized cost. For debt securities, impairment is considered other-than-temporary and recognized in its entirety in net income if either (i) we intend to sell the security or (ii) it is more-likely-than-not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If, however, we do not intend to sell the security and it is not more-likely-than-not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery, we must determine what portion of the impairment is attributable to a credit loss, which occurs when the amortized cost basis of the security exceeds the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected from the security. If there is no credit loss, there is no other-than-temporary impairment. If there is a credit loss, other-than-temporary impairment exists, and the credit loss must be recognized in net income and the remaining portion of impairment must be recognized in other comprehensive income. For equity securities, impairment is considered to be other-than-temporary based on our ability and intent to hold the investment until a recovery of fair

Table of Contents

value. Other-than-temporary impairment of an equity security results in a write-down that must be included in net income. We regularly review each investment security for other-than-temporary impairment based on criteria that includes the extent to which cost exceeds market price, the duration of that market decline, the financial health of and specific prospects for the issuer, our best estimate of the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from debt securities, our intention with regard to holding the security to maturity and the likelihood that we would be required to sell the security before recovery.

Other Real Estate Owned (OREO): Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at the fair value less costs to sell at the date of foreclosure. Subsequent to foreclosure, management periodically performs valuations of the foreclosed assets based on updated appraisals, general market conditions, recent sales of similar properties, length of time the properties have been held, and our ability and intention with regard to continued ownership of the properties. The Corporation may incur additional write-downs of foreclosed assets to fair value less costs to sell if valuations indicate a further deterioration in market conditions.

Goodwill: The Corporation's goodwill was recognized in connection with the Corporation's acquisition of CVBK in October 2013 and C&F Bank's acquisition of C&F Finance Company in September 2002. The Corporation reviews the carrying value of goodwill at least annually or more frequently if certain impairment indicators exist. In assessing the recoverability of the Corporation’s goodwill, major assumptions used in determining impairment are increases in future income, sales multiples in determining terminal value and the discount rate applied to future cash flows. If an impairment test is performed, we will prepare a sensitivity analysis by increasing the discount rate, lowering sales multiples and reducing increases in future income.

Retirement Plan: C&F Bank maintains a non-contributory, defined benefit pension plan for eligible full-time employees as specified by the plan. Plan assets, which consist primarily of mutual funds invested in marketable equity securities and corporate and government fixed income securities, are valued using market quotations. C&F Bank’s actuary determines plan obligations and annual pension expense using a number of key assumptions. Key assumptions may include the discount rate, the interest crediting rate, the estimated future return on plan assets and the anticipated rate of future salary increases. Changes in these assumptions in the future, if any, or in the method under which benefits are calculated may impact pension assets, liabilities or expense.

Derivative Financial Instruments: The Corporation uses derivatives primarily to manage risk associated with changing interest rates and to assist customers with their risk management objectives. The Corporation’s derivative financial instruments may include (1) interest rate lock commitments (IRLCs) on mortgage loans that will be held for sale and related forward sales commitments, (2) interest rate swaps with certain qualifying commercial loan customers and dealer counterparties and (3) interest rate swaps that qualify as cash flow hedges of the Corporation’s trust preferred capital notes. The Corporation recognizes derivative financial instruments at fair value as either an other asset or other liability in the consolidated balance sheet. Because the IRLCs, forward sales commitments and interest rate swaps with loan customers and dealer counterparties are classified as free standing derivatives, adjustments to reflect unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value of these instruments are reported in the income statement. The effective portion of the gain or loss on the Corporation’s cash flow hedges is reported as a component of other comprehensive income, net of deferred income taxes, and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transactions affect earnings.

Income Taxes: Determining the Corporation’s effective tax rate requires judgment. The Corporation’s net deferred tax asset is determined annually for differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. In addition, there may be transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax outcomes are uncertain and the Corporation’s tax returns are subject to audit by various tax authorities. Although we believe that the estimates are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome will not be materially different than that which is reflected in the income tax provision and accrual.

For further information concerning accounting policies, refer to Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” under the heading “Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Table of Contents

OVERVIEW

Our primary financial goals are to maximize the Corporation’s earnings and to deploy capital in profitable growth initiatives that will enhance long-term shareholder value. We track three primary financial performance measures in order to assess the level of success in achieving these goals: (i) return on average assets (ROA), (ii) return on average common equity (ROE), and (iii) growth in earnings. In addition to these financial performance measures, we track the performance of the Corporation’s three principal business segments: retail banking, mortgage banking, and consumer finance. We also actively manage our capital through growth, dividends and share repurchases, while considering the need to maintain a strong regulatory capital position.

Financial Performance Measures

Net income for the Corporation was $2.7 million for the first quarter of 2017, or $0.78 per common share assuming dilution, compared with net income of $2.5 million for the first quarter of 2016, or $0.72 per common share assuming dilution. The increase in net income for the first quarter of 2017, as compared to the same period of 2016, resulted from higher earnings at the Retail Banking segment, offset in part by lower earnings at the Consumer Finance and Mortgage Banking segments.

The Corporation’s annualized ROE and ROA were 7.86 percent and 0.76 percent, respectively, for the first quarter of 2017, compared to 7.51 percent and 0.71 percent, respectively, for the first quarter of 2016. The increases in ROE and ROA for the first quarter of 2017, compared to the same period in 2016, resulted from higher earnings.

Principal Business Segments

An overview of the financial results for each of the Corporation’s principal segments is presented below. A more detailed discussion is included in the section “Results of Operations.”

Retail Banking: The Retail Banking segment reported net income of $1.8 million for the first quarter of 2017, compared to net income of $1.3 million for the first quarter of 2016. Positive factors influencing net income of the Retail Banking segment for the first quarter of 2017 include: (1) the effect of loan growth on interest income, as average loans at C&F Bank increased $72.7 million or 11.7 percent during the first quarter 2017 over the first quarter 2016, (2) an increase in service charge income, and (3) a lower cost of borrowings resulting from the maturity and restructuring of a portion of the Bank’s higher-rate FHLB advances, which occurred in the third quarter of 2016. Partially offsetting these positive factors were (1) a decline in the yield on the investment portfolio due to replacing matured and called securities with lower-yielding securities and (2) higher operating expenses associated with strengthening C&F Bank’s technology infrastructure, growing its commercial lending teams, expanding its product offerings and promoting brand awareness.

The results for the first quarter of 2017 for the Retail Banking segment included acquisition accounting adjustments recorded in connection with the 2013 acquisition of CVB. The net accretion attributable to these adjustments recognized in the first quarter of 2017 was $214,000, net of taxes, compared to $206,000, net of taxes, for the first quarter of 2016.

C&F Bank’s total nonperforming assets were $9.1 million at March 31, 2017, compared to $4.4 million at December 31, 2016. Nonperforming assets at March 31, 2017 included $8.7 million in nonaccrual loans, compared to $4.2 million at December 31, 2016, and $376,000 in OREO, compared to $195,000 at December 31, 2016. The increase in nonaccrual loans during the first quarter of 2017 was due primarily to two commercial relationships totaling $6.5 million. One of these relationships totaling $4.6 million was restructured during the first quarter of 2017 and is reported in troubled debt restructurings (TDR) at March 31, 2017. The second relationship totaling $1.9 million has been restructured and classified as a TDR subsequent to March 31, 2017. Both of these relationships were previously identified as problem credits and classified accordingly. Specific reserves have also been established, which management believes are adequate to absorb probable losses on these loans. The OREO increase during the first quarter of 2017 was primarily due to the transfer of two residential properties to OREO.

Mortgage Banking: The Mortgage Banking segment reported net income of $297,000 for the first quarter of 2017, compared to net income of $322,000 for the first quarter of 2016. The Mortgage Banking segment began an expansion in Chesapeake, Virginia in the fourth quarter of 2016. This expansion contributed to both (1) higher loan production during

Table of Contents

the first quarter of 2017, which increased in total at the Mortgage Banking segment 35.7 percent over the first quarter of 2016 and resulted in higher gains on sales of loans, and (2) higher fixed personnel and overhead costs, which resulted in a slight decline in earnings during the first quarter of 2017. Loan origination volume for the first quarter of 2017 increased to $141.1 million from $104.0 million in the first quarter of 2016. The amount of loan originations during the first quarter of 2017 for refinancings and home purchases were $22.6 million and $118.5 million, respectively, compared to $21.8 million and $82.1 million, respectively, for the first quarter of 2016.

The continued focus at the Mortgage Banking segment is higher loan production, and we continue to seek new expansion opportunities. Management believes increasing future profitability at the Mortgage Banking segment is dependent on growth in loan originations due to the fixed costs of maintaining the personnel, compliance and technology infrastructure required to support mortgage banking activities.

Consumer Finance: The Consumer Finance segment reported net income of $942,000 for the first quarter of 2017, compared to net income of $1.1 million for the first quarter of 2016. The decline in net income for the first quarter of 2017, compared to the first quarter of 2016, was principally due to (1) net interest margin compression with lower loan yields resulting from competition in the non-prime automobile loan business and the acquisition of loan contracts with higher credit metrics and (2) higher-cost variable-rate borrowings resulting from increases in short-term interest rates since March 31, 2016. Partially offsetting the negative effects of rates on net interest income was organic loan growth, which increased average loans $9.3 million during the first quarter of 2017, as compared to the first quarter of 2016. C&F Finance implemented a scorecard model in 2016 that is providing underwriting efficiencies and generating more competitive pricing, which, along with personnel additions in certain major markets, contributed to loan growth since March 31, 2016.

The results of the Consumer Finance segment included a $4.3 million provision for loan losses for the first quarter of 2017, compared to $4.6 million for the first quarter of 2016. The annualized net charge-off ratio for the first quarter of 2017 was 6.11 percent, compared to 6.19 percent for the first quarter of 2016. The allowance for loan losses to total loans increased to 8.41 percent at March 31, 2017, compared to 8.40 percent at December 31, 2016. At March 31, 2017, total delinquent loans as a percentage of total loans declined to 3.00 percent from 5.15 percent at December 31, 2016, but increased from 2.83 percent at March 31, 2016. At March 31, 2017, repossessed assets totaled $2.1 million, compared to $3.1 million at December 31, 2016 and $1.9 million at March 31, 2016. Management believes that the current allowance for loan losses is adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the consumer finance loan portfolio and expects that loan purchases with higher credit quality will help reduce future charge-offs. However, if factors influencing the Consumer Finance segment result in a higher net charge-off ratio in the future, the segment may need to increase the level of its allowance for loan losses, which could negatively affect future earnings.

Other Segments: Other segments, which principally includes the Corporation’s holding company operations and wealth management subsidiary, reported an aggregate net loss of $330,000 for the first quarter of 2017, compared to a net loss of $249,000 for the first quarter of 2016. The higher net loss during the first quarter of 2017 included lower earnings at the Corporation’s wealth management subsidiary due to costs associated with the subsidiary’s addition of a new wealth management group in Williamsburg and Newport News, Virginia in the fourth quarter of 2016.

Capital Management. Total shareholders' equity was $141.4 million at March 31, 2017, compared to $139.2 million at December 31, 2016. Capital growth resulted from earnings for the first quarter of 2017 and an increase in unrealized holding gains on securities available for sale, which is a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. The increases were offset in part by dividends declared of 33 cents per share during the first quarter of 2017. The first quarter dividend was paid on April 1, 2017 and equated to a payout ratio of 42.3 percent of first quarter income. During the second quarter of 2016, the Corporation’s Board of Directors reauthorized a share repurchase program for the Corporation’s outstanding common stock (the Repurchase Program) to purchase up to $5 million of the Corporation’s common stock through May 2017. As of March 31, 2017, the Corporation had not used any of this authority and remained authorized to purchase up to $5.0 million of the Corporation’s common stock under the Repurchase Program. For more information about the Repurchase Program, see Part II, Item 2 “Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds” under the heading “Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table presents the average balance sheets, the amounts of interest earned on earning assets, with related yields, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, with related rates, for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. Loans include loans held for sale. Loans placed on a nonaccrual status are included in the balances and are included in the computation of yields, but had no material effect. Accretion and amortization of fair value purchase adjustments are included in the computation of yields on loans and investments and on the cost of deposits and borrowings acquired in connection with the purchase of CVB. The CVB accretion contributed approximately 20 basis points to the yield on loans and 15 basis points to both the yield on interest earning assets and the net interest margin for the first quarter of 2017 compared to approximately 19 basis points to the yield on loans and 14 basis points to both the yield on interest earning assets and the net interest margin for the first quarter of 2016. Interest on tax-exempt loans and securities is presented on a taxable-equivalent basis (which converts the income on loans and investments for which no income taxes are paid to the equivalent yield as if income taxes were paid using the federal corporate income tax rate of 34 percent).

TABLE 1: Average Balances, Income and Expense, Yields and Rates


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017						2016
	Average		Income/		Yield/		Average		Income/		Yield/
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		Expense		Rate		Balance		Expense		Rate
Assets
Securities:
Taxable	$	107,099	$	581	2.17	%	$	102,250	$	602	2.36	%
Tax-exempt		104,946		1,307	4.98			112,707		1,485	5.27
Total securities		212,045		1,888	3.56			214,957		2,087	3.88
Total loans		1,025,074		20,382	8.06			942,143		20,230	8.64
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		107,092		209	0.79			140,038		177	0.51
Total earning assets		1,344,211		22,479	6.77			1,297,138		22,494	6.97
Allowance for loan losses		(36,483)						(35,485)
Total non-earning assets		133,375						135,803
Total assets	$	1,441,103					$	1,397,456

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Time and savings deposits:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	226,153	$	123	0.22	%	$	219,107	$	130	0.24	%
Money market deposit accounts		217,836		143	0.27			210,181		142	0.27
Savings accounts		106,117		21	0.08			101,078		20	0.08
Certificates of deposit, $100 or more		159,997		410	1.04			138,468		358	1.04
Other certificates of deposit		182,134		438	0.98			199,060		451	0.91
Total time and savings deposits		892,237		1,135	0.52			867,894		1,101	0.51
Borrowings		164,747		1,135	2.80			175,563		1,161	2.62
Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,056,984		2,270	0.87			1,043,457		2,262	0.86
Demand deposits		220,732						198,424
Other liabilities		24,381						23,248
Total liabilities		1,302,097						1,265,129
Shareholders’ equity		139,006						132,327
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,441,103					$	1,397,456
Net interest income			$	20,209					$	20,232
Interest rate spread					5.90	%					6.11	%
Interest expense to average earning assets (annualized)					0.69	%					0.70	%
Net interest margin (annualized)					6.09	%					6.28	%

Interest income and expense are affected by fluctuations in interest rates, by changes in the volume of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and by the interaction of rate and volume factors. The following table shows the direct causes of the period-to-period changes in the components of net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis. The Corporation calculates the rate and volume variances using a formula prescribed by the SEC. Rate/volume variances, the third element in the calculation, are not shown separately in the table, but are allocated to the rate and volume variances in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each. Loans include both nonaccrual loans and loans held for sale.

Table of Contents

TABLE 2: Rate-Volume Recap


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 from 2016
	Increase (Decrease)				Total
	Due to				Increase
(Dollars in thousands)	Rate		Volume		(Decrease)
Interest income:
Loans	$	(6,112)	$	6,264	$	152
Securities:
Taxable		(157)		136		(21)
Tax-exempt		(79)		(99)		(178)
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		258		(226)		32
Total interest income		(6,090)		6,075		(15)
Interest expense:
Time and savings deposits:
Interest-bearing demand deposits		(29)		22		(7)
Money market deposit accounts		(11)		12		1
Savings accounts		—		1		1
Certificates of deposit, $100 or more		(2)		54		52
Other certificates of deposit		135		(148)		(13)
Total time and savings deposits		93		(59)		34
Borrowings		285		(311)		(26)
Total interest expense		378		(370)		8
Change in net interest income	$	(6,468)	$	6,445	$	(23)

Net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $20.21 million, compared to $20.23 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The annualized net interest margin for the first quarter of 2017 decreased 19 basis points to 6.09 percent, compared to 6.28 percent for the first quarter of 2016. The decrease resulted from a decline in the yield on interest-earning assets of 20 basis points, which was primarily attributable to decreases in the yields on the loan and investment securities portfolios. These decreases were somewhat offset by a shift in the composition of earning assets as growth in the higher-yielding loan portfolio was funded in part by a decline in lower-yielding deposits in other banks. While the cost of interest-bearing liabilities in the first quarter of 2017 increased one basis point, deposits continued to shift from higher-cost term deposits to lower-cost non-term deposits, as described below.

Average loans, which includes both loans held for investment and loans held for sale, increased $82.9 million to $1.0 billion for the first quarter of 2017, compared to the same period of 2016. Average loans held for sale did not have a significant effect on the change in average loans because there was only a $1.1 million increase in average loans held for sale during the first quarter of 2017 over the first quarter of 2016. Average loans held for investment for the Retail Banking segment increased $72.7 million, or 11.7 percent, for the first quarter of 2017, compared to the same period in 2016. Average loans at the Retail Banking segment increased for the first quarter of 2017 because of growth in the commercial real estate and real estate mortgage segments of the loan portfolio, which was driven by investing in experienced commercial lending personnel over the past several years and the continued strong loan demand in the real estate development and construction sectors of our markets. Average loans held for investment at the Consumer Finance segment increased $9.3 million, or 3.2 percent, for the first quarter of 2017, compared to the same period of 2016, which was the result of organic loan growth since March 31, 2016.

The overall yield on average loans decreased 58 basis points to 8.06 percent for the first quarter of 2017, compared to the same period of 2016. The decrease in the average loan yield was due to (1) loan growth at the Retail Banking segment, which has lower yields, outpacing growth in higher-yielding loans at the Consumer Finance segment and (2) the decline in the average yield on loans at the Retail Banking, Mortgage Banking and Consumer Finance segments. The Bank’s average loan yield has declined due to the effects of the low interest rate and competitive environment on new originations and renewals. The low interest rate environment also contributed to a decline in the yield on loans held for sale at the Mortgage Banking segment. The Consumer Finance segment’s yield has been affected by the continued competitive

Table of Contents

pressure on loan pricing strategies and a strategic decision to purchase loans with higher credit quality metrics, but lower yields.

Average securities available for sale decreased $2.9 million for the first quarter of 2017, compared to the same period of 2016, as a result of securities maturities and calls. The average yield on the securities portfolio decreased 32 basis points for the first quarter of 2017, due to the (1) purchase of lower-yielding shorter-term securities to replace maturities and calls of longer-term, higher yielding securities and (2) the current interest rate environment. The Corporation has shortened the security portfolio’s duration by investing in lower-yielding, shorter-term securities in order to mitigate interest-rate risk of a potential future rising interest rate environment.

Average interest-bearing deposits in other banks, consisting primarily of excess reserves maintained at the Federal Reserve Bank, decreased $32.9 million during the first quarter of 2017, compared to the first quarter of 2016, because the Corporation used these funds to partially fund loan growth during 2016 and 2017. The average yield on these overnight funds increased 28 basis points during the first quarter of 2017 because of the Federal Reserve Bank’s increases in the interest rate on excess reserve balances from 0.50 percent in December 2015 to 1.00 percent by the end of the first quarter of 2017.

Average interest-bearing time and non-term savings and demand deposits increased $4.6 million and $19.7 million, respectively, for the first quarter of 2017, compared to the same period in 2016. The average cost of interest-bearing deposits increased one basis point during the first quarter of 2017.

Average borrowings decreased $10.8 million for the first quarter of 2017, compared to the same period of 2016. The decrease resulted from the repayment during 2016 of the borrowings used to purchase a consumer finance loan portfolio at the end of the second quarter of 2015. The average cost of borrowings increased 18 basis points during the first quarter of 2017, as compared to the same period of 2016, because of increases in one-month LIBOR to which variable rate borrowing at the Consumer Finance segment is indexed, which was offset in part by a lower cost of borrowings at the Bank resulting from the maturity and restructuring of higher-rate FHLB advances during 2016.

The Corporation believes that it will be challenging to maintain the Retail Banking segment’s net interest margin at its current level, even with anticipated loan growth during 2017, because the current low interest rate environment has contributed to lower yields on both the loan and investment portfolios. In addition, the recent increase in the federal funds rate may provide stimulus for higher-costing deposits, which reprice faster than loans and investments when interest rates rise. The net interest margin at the Consumer Finance segment will be most affected by continued market competition and lower yields on higher-quality loans and the recent increase in the federal funds rate triggering higher-costing variable-rate borrowings.

Noninterest Income

TABLE 3: Noninterest Income


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
	Retail		Mortgage		Consumer		Other and
(Dollars in thousands)	Banking		Banking		Finance		Eliminations		Total
Gains on sales of loans	$	—	$	1,943	$	—	$	—	$	1,943
Service charges on deposit accounts		1,069		—		—		—		1,069
Other service charges and fees		1,144		900		2		—		2,046
Net gains on calls and sales of available for sale securities		1		—		—		—		1
Wealth management services income		—		—		—		378		378
BOLI income		84		—		—		—		84
Other income		202		187		230		6		625
Total noninterest income	$	2,500	$	3,030	$	232	$	384	$	6,146

Table of Contents


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
	Retail		Mortgage		Consumer		Other and
(Dollars in thousands)	Banking		Banking		Finance		Eliminations		Total
Gains on sales of loans	$	—	$	1,730	$	—	$	—	$	1,730
Service charges on deposit accounts		963		—		—		—		963
Other service charges and fees		1,051		630		3		—		1,684
Net gains on calls and sales of available for sale securities		1		—		—		—		1
Wealth management services income		—		—		—		276		276
BOLI income		86		—		—		—		86
Other income		61		113		229		20		423
Total noninterest income	$	2,162	$	2,473	$	232	$	296	$	5,163

Total noninterest income increased $983,000, or 19.0 percent, in the first quarter of 2017, compared to the same period in 2016. The increases in total noninterest income were primarily due to higher (1) gains on sales of loans and ancillary loan origination fees at the Mortgage Banking segment because of higher loan production, (2) debit card interchange income at the Retail Banking segment, (3) overdraft charges at the Retail Banking segment, (4) wealth management income at C&F Wealth Management because of the addition of a new wealth management group in Williamsburg and Newport News, Virginia in the fourth quarter of 2016, and (5) appreciation related to the non-qualified deferred compensation plan.

Noninterest Expense

TABLE 4: Noninterest Expense


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
	Retail		Mortgage		Consumer		Other and
(Dollars in thousands)	Banking		Banking		Finance		Eliminations		Total
Salaries and employee benefits	$	6,235	$	1,483	$	2,412	$	539	$	10,669
Occupancy expense		1,858		496		250		17		2,621
OREO expenses		24		—		—		—		24
Provision for indemnification losses		—		35		—		—		35
Other expenses		2,561		748		1,003		184		4,496
Total other expenses		2,585		783		1,003		184		4,555
Total noninterest expense	$	10,678	$	2,762	$	3,665	$	740	$	17,845


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
	Retail		Mortgage		Consumer		Other and
(Dollars in thousands)	Banking		Banking		Finance		Eliminations		Total
Salaries and employee benefits	$	6,008	$	1,184	$	2,627	$	352	$	10,171
Occupancy expense		1,727		413		192		2		2,334
OREO expenses		56		—		—		—		56
Provision for indemnification losses		—		52		—		—		52
Other expenses		2,649		536		1,136		156		4,477
Total other expenses		2,705		588		1,136		156		4,585
Total noninterest expense	$	10,440	$	2,185	$	3,955	$	510	$	17,090

Total noninterest expenses increased $755,000, or 4.4 percent, in the first quarter of 2017, compared to the same period in 2016. The increase in noninterest expenses resulted primarily from higher personnel costs at (1) C&F Bank principally because of increased staff levels and support positions associated with growing C&F Bank's commercial loan portfolio, including its expansion into Charlottesville, Virginia in June 2016, (2) C&F Mortgage because of higher loan production and the Mortgage Banking segment’s expansion into Chesapeake, Virginia, which began in the fourth quarter of 2016, and (3) the Corporation’s wealth management subsidiary because of the addition of a new wealth management group in Williamsburg and Newport News, Virginia in the fourth quarter of 2016. Occupancy expense increased (1) at the Bank, C&F Mortgage, and at C&F Finance due to expenses associated with strengthening the technology infrastructure and (2) at the Bank, C&F Mortgage, and C&F Wealth Management due to higher rent expense for the addition of locations in Charlottesville, Chesapeake, and Williamsburg, respectively. These increases in noninterest expenses were offset in part

Table of Contents

at C&F Finance by lower (1) personnel costs due to fewer sales contracts purchased during the first quarter of 2017, (2) repossession expenses due to normal fluctuations in the timing of repossessed asset sales and (3) collection expenses due to additional costs associated with the transition to new systems in the first quarter of 2016.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense for the first quarter of 2017 was $921,000 resulting in an effective tax rate of 25.2 percent, compared with $692,000, or 21.8 percent, for the first quarter of 2016. The increase in the effective tax rate in the first quarter of 2017, compared to the same period of 2016, resulted at the Retail Banking segment from lower tax credits and slightly higher amortization associated with its investment in qualified affordable housing projects and a decline in tax-exempt income on investment securities as a percentage of total income.

ASSET QUALITY

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses represents an amount that, in our judgment, will be adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The provision for loan losses increases the allowance, and loans charged off, net of recoveries, reduce the allowance. Table 5 summarizes the allowance activity for the periods indicated:

TABLE 5: Allowance for Loan Losses


	Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2017			2016
Allowance, beginning of period	$	37,066		$	35,569
Provision for loan losses:
Retail Banking segment		100			—
Mortgage Banking segment		—			—
Consumer Finance segment		4,300			4,600
Total provision for loan losses		4,400			4,600
Loans charged off:
Real estate—residential mortgage		(5)			—
Commercial, financial and agricultural1		(153)			(35)
Equity lines		—			(55)
Consumer		(62)			(71)
Consumer finance		(5,678)			(5,601)
Total loans charged off		(5,898)			(5,762)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off:
Real estate—residential mortgage		14			26
Commercial, financial and agricultural1		7			160
Consumer		41			127
Consumer finance		1,104			1,118
Total recoveries		1,166			1,431
Net loans charged off		(4,732)			(4,331)
Allowance, end of period	$	36,734		$	35,838
Ratio of annualized net charge-offs (recoveries) to average total loans outstanding during period for Retail Banking		0.02	%		(0.10)	%
Ratio of annualized net charge-offs to average total loans outstanding during period for Consumer Finance2		6.11	%		6.19	%

1Includes the Corporation’s commercial real estate lending, land acquisition and development lending, builder line lending and commercial business lending.

Table of Contents

The consumer finance loan portfolio purchased during the second quarter of 2015 had the effect of increasing the annualized net charge-off ratio by 23 basis points and 55 basis points for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Table 6 presents the allocation of the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

TABLE 6: Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses


	March 31,			December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2017			2016
Allocation of allowance for loan losses:
Real estate—residential mortgage	$	2,535		$	2,559
Real estate—construction 1		741			816
Commercial, financial and agricultural 2		7,506			7,393
Equity lines		712			685
Consumer		162			261
Consumer finance		25,078			25,352
Total allowance for loan losses	$	36,734		$	37,066
Ratio of loans to total period-end loans:
Real estate—residential mortgage		19	%		19	%
Real estate—construction 1		5			6
Commercial, financial and agricultural 2		40			39
Equity lines		5			5
Consumer		1			1
Consumer finance		30			30
		100	%		100	%

Includes the Corporation’s real estate construction lending and consumer real estate lot lending.

Includes the Corporation’s commercial real estate lending, land acquisition and development lending, builder line lending and commercial business lending.

Credit Quality

Loans by credit quality indicators are presented in Table 7 below. The characteristics of these loan ratings are as follows:

Pass rated loans are to persons or business entities with an acceptable financial condition, appropriate collateral margins, appropriate cash flow to service the existing loan, and an appropriate leverage ratio. The borrower has paid all obligations as agreed and it is expected that this type of payment history will continue. When necessary, acceptable personal guarantors support the loan.

Special mention loans have a specific, identified weakness in the borrower’s operations and in the borrower’s ability to generate positive cash flow on a sustained basis. The borrower’s recent payment history is characterized by late payments. The Corporation’s risk exposure is mitigated by collateral supporting the loan. The collateral is considered to be well-margined, well maintained, accessible and readily marketable.

Table of Contents

Substandard loans are considered to have specific and well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the viability of the Corporation’s credit extension. The payment history for the loan has been inconsistent and the expected or projected primary repayment source may be inadequate to service the loan. The estimated net liquidation value of the collateral pledged and/or ability of the personal guarantor(s) to pay the loan may not adequately protect the Corporation. There is a distinct possibility that the Corporation will sustain some loss if the deficiencies associated with the loan are not corrected in the near term. A substandard loan would not automatically meet the Corporation’s definition of impaired unless the loan is significantly past due and the borrower’s performance and financial condition provide evidence that it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due.

Substandard nonaccrual loans have the same characteristics as substandard loans; however, they have a nonaccrual classification because it is probable that the Corporation will not be able to collect all amounts due.

Doubtful rated loans have all the weaknesses inherent in a loan that is classified substandard but with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high.

Loss rated loans are not considered collectible under normal circumstances and there is no realistic expectation for any future payment on the loan. Loss rated loans are fully charged off.

TABLE 7: Credit Quality Indicators

Loans by credit quality indicators as of March 31, 2017 were as follows:


			Special				Substandard
(Dollars in thousands)	Pass		Mention		Substandard		Nonaccrual		Total1
Real estate – residential mortgage	$	183,451	$	1,925	$	3,374	$	1,019	$	189,769
Real estate – construction 2		50,693		—		—		—		50,693
Commercial, financial and agricultural 3		371,131		3,703		18,008		7,011		399,853
Equity lines		49,729		528		178		712		51,147
Consumer		10,671		—		331		2		11,004
	$	665,675	$	6,156	$	21,891	$	8,744	$	702,466


			Non-
(Dollars in thousands)	Performing		Performing		Total
Consumer finance	$	297,977	$	384	$	298,361

At March 31, 2017, the Corporation did not have any loans classified as Doubtful or Loss.

Includes the Corporation’s real estate construction lending and consumer real estate lot lending.

Includes the Corporation’s commercial real estate lending, land acquisition and development lending, builder line lending and commercial business lending.

Included in the table above are loans purchased in connection with the 2013 acquisition of CVB of $51.3 million pass rated, $2.2 million special mention, $2.9 million substandard and $2.1 million substandard nonaccrual.

Table of Contents

Loans by credit quality indicators as of December 31, 2016 were as follows:


			Special				Substandard
(Dollars in thousands)	Pass		Mention		Substandard		Nonaccrual		Total1
Real estate – residential mortgage	$	181,814	$	2,037	$	2,761	$	1,652	$	188,264
Real estate – construction 2		55,732		—		—		—		55,732
Commercial, financial and agricultural 3		356,301		7,469		24,868		1,750		390,388
Equity lines		51,186		480		177		757		52,600
Consumer		7,870		2		409		118		8,399
	$	652,903	$	9,988	$	28,215	$	4,277	$	695,383


			Non-
(Dollars in thousands)	Performing		Performing		Total
Consumer finance	$	301,280	$	565	$	301,845

At December 31, 2016, the Corporation did not have any loans classified as Doubtful or Loss.

Includes the Corporation’s real estate construction lending and consumer real estate lot lending.

Includes the Corporation’s commercial real estate lending, land acquisition and development lending, builder line lending and commercial business lending.

Included in the table above are loans purchased in connection with the 2013 acquisition of CVB of $54.1 million pass rated, $2.6 million special mention, $5.7 million substandard and $196,000 substandard nonaccrual.

The Retail Banking segment's allowance for loan losses as of March 31, 2017 decreased $58,000 since December 31, 2016 as a result of net charge-offs, which were partially offset by a $100,000 provision for loan losses at the Retail Banking segment during the first quarter of 2017 because of an increase in specific reserves related to nonaccrual loans as discussed below. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans, excluding purchased credit impaired loans, declined to 1.60 percent at March 31, 2017, compared to 1.63 percent at December 31, 2016, because of loan growth during the first quarter of 2017. We believe that the current level of the allowance for loan losses at the Retail Banking segment is adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio, based on the relevant history of charge-offs and recoveries, current economic conditions, overall portfolio quality and review of specifically criticized loans. If loan concentrations within the Retail Banking segment’s loan portfolio result in higher credit risk or if economic conditions deteriorate in future periods, a higher level of nonperforming loans may be experienced, which may then require a higher provision for loan losses.

The Consumer Finance segment’s allowance for loan losses decreased $274,000 to $25.1 million at March 31, 2017 from $25.4 million at December 31, 2016, and its provision for loan losses decreased $300,000 for the first quarter of 2017, compared to the same period in 2016. The decrease in the allowance and the lower provision resulted from a decline in total loans and a decrease in delinquent loans as a percentage of total loans since December 31, 2016. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans increased to 8.41 percent at March 31, 2017, from 8.40 percent at December 31, 2016. While there was no significant fluctuation in net charge-offs, repossessed assets and past due loans increased at March 31, 2017, compared to March 31, 2016. We believe that the current level of the allowance for loan losses at the Consumer Finance segment is adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio.

Table of Contents

Nonperforming Assets

Table 8 summarizes nonperforming assets at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

TABLE 8: Nonperforming Assets

Retail Banking Segment


	March 31,			December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2017			2016
Loans, excluding purchased loans	$	640,787		$	629,523
Purchased performing loans1		51,024			53,329
Purchased credit impaired loans1		7,409			9,256
Total loans	$	699,220		$	692,108

Nonaccrual loans2	$	6,627		$	4,039
Purchased performing-nonaccrual loans3		2,076			196
Total nonaccrual loans		8,703			4,235
OREO4		376			195
Total nonperforming assets5	$	9,079		$	4,430

Accruing loans past due for 90 days or more6	$	1,406		$	6
Troubled debt restructurings (TDRs)2	$	9,210		$	4,964
Purchased performing TDRs7	$	846		$	861
Allowance for loan losses (ALL)	$	11,058		$	11,115
Nonperforming assets to total loans and OREO		1.30	%		0.64	%
ALL to total loans, excluding purchased credit impaired loans8		1.60			1.63
ALL to total nonaccrual loans		127.06			262.46

The loans acquired from CVB are tracked in two separate categories – “purchased performing” and “purchased credit impaired.” The remaining discount for the purchased performing loans was $2.7 million at March 31, 2017 and $2.9 million at December 31, 2016. The remaining discount for the purchased credit impaired loans was $10.1 million at March 31, 2017 and $10.5 million at December 31, 2016.

Nonaccrual loans include nonaccrual TDRs of $4.7 million at March 31, 2017 and $2.0 million at December 31, 2016.

Purchased performing-nonaccrual loans are presented net of the remaining interest and credit marks totaling $188,000 at March 31, 2017 and $137,000 at December 31, 2016.

⁴

OREO is recorded at its estimated fair value less cost to sell.

⁵

As required by acquisition accounting, purchased credit impaired loans that were considered nonaccrual and TDRs prior to the acquisition lose these designations and are not included in post-acquisition nonperforming assets as presented in this table.

⁶

Accruing loans past due for 90 days or more include purchased credit impaired loans of $194,000 as of March 31, 2017 and $0 as of December 31, 2016.

⁷

Purchased performing TDRs are accruing and are presented net of the remaining interest and credit marks totaling $10,500 at March 31, 2017 and $11,300 at December 31, 2016.

⁸

For the purpose of calculating this ratio, purchased performing loans are included in total loans. Purchased performing loans were marked to fair value on acquisition date; therefore, no allowance for loan losses was recorded at the acquisition date for these loans.

Table of Contents

Mortgage Banking Segment


	March 31,			December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2017			2016
Nonaccrual loans	$	41		$	41
Total loans	$	3,246		$	3,275
ALL	$	598		$	598
Nonaccrual loans to total loans		1.26	%		1.25	%
ALL to loans		18.42			18.26
ALL to nonaccrual loans		1,458.54			1,458.54

Consumer Finance Segment


	March 31,			December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2017			2016
Nonaccrual loans	$	384		$	565
Accruing loans past due for 90 days or more	$	—		$	—
Total loans	$	298,361		$	301,845
ALL	$	25,078		$	25,353
Nonaccrual consumer finance loans to total consumer finance loans		0.13	%		0.19	%
ALL to total consumer finance loans1		8.41			8.40

The Consumer Finance loan portfolio purchased during the second quarter of 2015 had the effect of decreasing the allowance to total loans ratio by 11 basis points at March 31, 2017 and 14 basis points at December 31, 2016.

Nonperforming assets of the Retail Banking segment totaled $9.1 million at March 31, 2017, compared to $4.4 million at December 31, 2016. The Retail Banking segment's nonperforming assets included $8.7 million of nonaccrual loans at March 31, 2017, compared to $4.2 million at December 31, 2016, and $376,000 of OREO at March 31, 2017, compared to $195,000 at December 31, 2016. The increase in nonaccrual loans during the first quarter of 2017 was primarily due to two commercial relationships totaling $6.5 million. One of these relationships totaling $4.6 million was restructured during the first quarter of 2017 and is reported in troubled debt restructurings (TDR) at March 31, 2017. The second relationship totaling $1.9 million has been restructured and classified as a TDR subsequent to March 31, 2017. Both of these relationships were previously identified as problem credits and classified accordingly. Specific reserves have also been established, which management believes are adequate to absorb probable losses on these loans. The OREO increase during the first quarter of 2017 was primarily due to the transfer of two residential properties to OREO. Accruing loans past due for 90 days or more increased to $1.4 million at March 31, 2017, as compared to $6,000 at December 31, 2016. This increase was primarily due to one commercial relationship, which is adequately secured and is in the process of collection. We believe we have provided adequate loan loss reserves based on our evaluations of the collectability of loans, which considers trends in delinquencies and charge-offs, changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions that may affect borrowers’ ability to repay and collateral values, overall portfolio quality and review of specific potential losses.

Nonaccrual loans at the Consumer Finance segment were $384,000 at March 31, 2017, compared to $565,000 at December 31, 2016. Nonaccrual consumer finance loans remain relatively low compared to the allowance for loan losses and the total consumer finance loan portfolio because the Consumer Finance segment generally initiates repossession of loan collateral once a loan is 60 days or more past due but before the loan reaches 90 days or more past due and is evaluated for nonaccrual status. Repossessed assets at March 31, 2017 were $2.1 million, compared to $3.1 million at December 31, 2016 and $2.0 million at March 31, 2016.

Table of Contents

Impaired Loans

We measure impaired loans based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate of the loan or, as a practical expedient, at the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. We maintain a valuation allowance to the extent that the measure of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment. TDRs occur when we agree to significantly modify the original terms of a loan by granting a concession due to the deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower. These concessions typically are made for loss mitigation purposes and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions. TDRs are considered impaired loans.

TABLE 9: Impaired Loans

Impaired loans, which included TDR loans of $10.1 million, and the related allowance at March 31, 2017, were as follows:



			Recorded		Recorded
			Investment		Investment				Average
	Unpaid		in Loans		in Loans				Balance-		Interest
	Principal		without		with		Related		Impaired		Income
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		Specific Reserve		Specific Reserve		Allowance		Loans		Recognized
Real estate – residential mortgage	$	3,597	$	1,935	$	1,615	$	313	$	3,561	$	46
Commercial, financial and agricultural:
Commercial real estate lending		8,021		489		7,430		855		7,979		19
Commercial business lending		133		63		66		38		134		1
Equity lines		32		—		30		30		32		—
Consumer		321		—		322		6		321		3
Total	$	12,104	$	2,487	$	9,463	$	1,242	$	12,027	$	69

Impaired loans, which consisted solely of TDRs, and the related allowance at December 31, 2016, were as follows:



			Recorded		Recorded
			Investment		Investment				Average
	Unpaid		in Loans		in Loans				Balance-		Interest
	Principal		without		with		Related		Impaired		Income
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		Specific Reserve		Specific Reserve		Allowance		Loans		Recognized
Real estate – residential mortgage	$	3,539	$	1,676	$	1,732	$	251	$	3,446	$	122
Commercial, financial and agricultural:
Commercial real estate lending		1,967		430		1,272		261		1,746		29
Commercial business lending		167		89		74		46		181		8
Equity lines		32		32		—		—		32		1
Consumer		520		—		520		94		521		8
Total	$	6,225	$	2,227	$	3,598	$	652	$	5,926	$	168

TDRs at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were as follows:

TABLE 10: Troubled Debt Restructurings


		March 31,		December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2017		2016
Accruing TDRs	$	5,317	$	3,851
Nonaccrual TDRs1		4,739		1,974
Total TDRs2	$	10,056	$	5,825

Included in nonaccrual loans in Table 8: Nonperforming Assets.

Included in impaired loans in Table 9: Impaired Loans.

Table of Contents

While TDRs are considered impaired loans, not all TDRs are on nonaccrual status. If a loan was on nonaccrual status at the time of the TDR modification, the loan will remain on nonaccrual status following the modification and may be returned to accrual status based on the Corporation’s policy for returning loans to accrual status. If a loan was accruing prior to being modified as a TDR and if management concludes that the borrower is able to make such modified payments, and there are no other factors or circumstances that would cause management to conclude otherwise, the TDR will remain on an accruing status.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

At March 31, 2017, the Corporation had total assets of $1.5 billion, which was an increase of $12.5 million since December 31, 2016. The increase resulted primarily from deposit growth, which funded increases in total cash and cash equivalents of $17.3 million, loans held for investment of $3.9 million, and $3.1 million in investment securities. Offsetting these increases was a decrease of $10.8 million in loans held for sale.

Loan Portfolio

The following table sets forth the composition of the Corporation’s loans held for investment in dollar amounts and as a percentage of the Corporation’s total loans held for investment at the dates indicated.

TABLE 11: Summary of Loans Held for Investment


	March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent
Real estate—residential mortgage	$	189,769	19	%	$	188,264	19	%
Real estate—construction 1		50,693	5			55,732	6
Commercial, financial, and agricultural 2		399,853	40			390,388	39
Equity lines		51,147	5			52,600	5
Consumer		11,004	1			8,399	1
Consumer finance		298,361	30			301,845	30
Total loans		1,000,827	100	%		997,228	100	%
Less allowance for loan losses		(36,734)				(37,066)
Total loans, net	$	964,093			$	960,162

Includes the Corporation’s real estate construction lending and consumer real estate lot lending.

Includes the Corporation’s commercial real estate lending, land acquisition and development lending, builder line lending and commercial business lending.

Investment Securities

The investment portfolio plays a primary role in the management of the Corporation’s interest rate sensitivity. In addition, the portfolio serves as a source of liquidity and is used as needed to meet collateral requirements. The investment portfolio consists of securities available for sale, which may be sold in response to changes in market interest rates, changes in prepayment risk, increases in loan demand, general liquidity needs and other similar factors. These securities are carried at estimated fair value. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, all securities in the Corporation’s investment portfolio were classified as available for sale.

The following table sets forth the composition of the Corporation’s securities available for sale in dollar amounts at fair value and as a percentage of the Corporation’s total securities available for sale at the dates indicated.

Table of Contents

TABLE 12: Securities Available for Sale


	March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent
U.S. government agencies and corporations	$	16,672	8	%	$	16,112	8	%
Mortgage-backed securities		82,593	39			76,816	36
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		113,814	53			117,098	56
Total available for sale securities at fair value	$	213,079	100	%	$	210,026	100	%

For more information about the Corporation's securities available for sale, including a description of securities in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, see Part I, Item 1, "Financial Statements" under the heading "Note 2: Securities" in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Deposits

The Corporation’s predominant source of funds is depository accounts, which are comprised of demand deposits, savings and money market accounts and time deposits. The Corporation’s deposits are principally provided by individuals and businesses located within the communities served.

During the first quarter of 2017, deposits increased $12.6 million to $1.13 billion at March 31, 2017, compared to $1.12 billion at December 31, 2016. This increase resulted primarily from an $18.0 million increase in non-interest bearing demand deposits and a $1.3 million increase in time deposits. Partially offsetting these increases was a $6.7 million decrease in savings and interest-bearing demand deposits resulting primarily from the cyclical decline in municipal deposits.

The Corporation had $3.2 million in brokered money market deposits outstanding at March 31, 2017. The source of these brokered deposits is uninvested cash balances held in third-party brokerage sweep accounts. The Corporation uses brokered deposits as a means of diversifying liquidity sources, as opposed to a long-term deposit gathering strategy.

Borrowings

Borrowings increased to $165.8 million at March 31, 2017 from $164.6 million at December 31, 2016 as a result of repurchase arrangements with commercial deposit customers.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of March 31, 2017, there have been no material changes to the off-balance sheet arrangements disclosed in Part II, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis," under the heading "Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements" in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Contractual Obligations

As of March 31, 2017, there have been no material changes outside the ordinary course of business to the contractual obligations disclosed in Part II, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis," under the heading "Contractual Obligations" in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Table of Contents

The Corporation uses derivatives to manage exposure to interest rate risk through the use of interest rate swaps. Interest rate swaps involve the exchange of fixed and variable rate interest payments between two parties, based on a common notional principal amount and maturity date with no exchange of underlying principal amounts.

The Corporation has interest rate swaps that qualify as cash flow hedges. The Corporation’s cash flow hedges effectively modify the Corporation’s exposure to interest rate risk by converting variable rates of interest on $15.0 million and $10.0 million of the Corporation’s trust preferred capital notes to fixed rates of interest until December 2019 and September 2020, respectively. The cash flow hedges’ total notional amount is $25.0 million. At March 31, 2017, certain of the cash flow hedges had a fair value of $21,000, which is recorded in other assets and certain of the cash flow hedges had a fair value of ($11,000), which is recorded in other liabilities. The cash flow hedges were fully effective at March 31, 2017. Therefore, the net gain on cash flow hedges was recognized as a component of other comprehensive income, net of deferred income taxes.

Pursuant to a program the Corporation initiated during 2016, the Corporation also enters into interest rate swaps with certain qualifying commercial loan customers to meet their interest rate risk management needs. The Corporation simultaneously enters into interest rate swaps with dealer counterparties, with identical notional amounts and terms. The net result of these interest rate swaps is that the customer pays a fixed rate of interest and the Corporation receives a floating rate. The total notional amount of the interest rate swaps on loans is $50.1 million. At March 31, 2017, the interest rate swaps had a net fair value of zero, with $1.1 million recognized in other assets and $1.1 million recognized in other liabilities. These swaps are not designated as hedging instruments; therefore, changes in fair values are recorded in other noninterest expense.

Liquidity

The objective of the Corporation’s liquidity management is to ensure the continuous availability of funds to satisfy the credit needs of our customers and the demands of our depositors, creditors and investors. Stable core deposits and a strong capital position are the components of a solid foundation for the Corporation’s liquidity position. Additional sources of liquidity available to the Corporation include cash flows from operations, loan payments and payoffs, deposit growth, sales of securities, the issuance of brokered certificates of deposit and the capacity to borrow additional funds.

Liquid assets, which include cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits at other banks and nonpledged securities available for sale, totaled $226.1 million at March 31, 2017, compared to $199.1 million at December 31, 2016. The increase since December 31, 2016 is primarily the result of growth in deposits in excess of loan funding needs. The Corporation’s funding sources at March 31, 2017 are presented in Table 13.

TABLE 13: Funding Sources


	March 31, 2017
(Dollars in thousands)	Capacity		Outstanding		Available
Unsecured federal funds agreements	$	65,000	$	—	$	65,000
Repurchase agreements		5,000		5,000		—
Repurchase lines of credit		50,000		—		50,000
Borrowings from FHLB		155,476		47,000		108,476
Borrowings from Federal Reserve Bank		13,605		—		13,605
Revolving line of credit		120,000		75,029		44,971
Total	$	409,081	$	127,029	$	282,052

We have no reason to believe these arrangements will not be renewed at maturity. Additional loans and securities are available that can be pledged as collateral for future borrowings from the Federal Reserve Bank or the FHLB above the current lendable collateral value. Our ability to maintain sufficient liquidity may be affected by numerous factors, including economic conditions nationally and in our markets. Depending on our liquidity levels, our capital position, conditions in the capital markets, our business operations and initiatives, and other factors, we may from time to time consider the

Table of Contents

issuance of debt, equity or other securities or other possible capital market transactions, the proceeds of which could provide additional liquidity for our operations.

As a result of the Corporation’s management of liquid assets and the ability to generate liquidity through liability funding, management believes that the Corporation maintains overall liquidity sufficient to satisfy its operational requirements and contractual obligations.

Capital Resources

The Corporation’s and the Bank’s actual regulatory capital amounts and ratios under currently applicable regulatory capital standards are presented in the following table.


									Minimum To Be
									Well Capitalized
									Under Prompt
					Minimum Capital				Corrective Action
	Actual				Requirements				Provisions
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
As of March 31, 2017:
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Corporation	$	164,154	14.3	%	$	91,699	8.0	%		N/A	N/A
C&F Bank		165,595	14.4			91,821	8.0		$	114,776	10.0	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Corporation		149,488	13.0			68,774	6.0			N/A	N/A
C&F Bank		150,966	13.2			68,866	6.0			91,821	8.0
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Corporation		124,621	10.9			51,581	4.5			N/A	N/A
C&F Bank		150,966	13.2			51,649	4.5			74,604	6.5
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)
Corporation		149,488	10.5			56,922	4.0			N/A	N/A
C&F Bank		150,966	10.6			56,958	4.0			71,198	5.0

As of December 31, 2016:
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Corporation	$	159,525	13.9	%	$	91,695	8.0	%		N/A	N/A
C&F Bank		160,971	14.0			91,772	8.0		$	114,716	10.0	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Corporation		144,819	12.6			68,772	6.0			N/A	N/A
C&F Bank		146,307	12.8			68,829	6.0			91,772	8.0
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Corporation		120,085	10.5			51,579	4.5			N/A	N/A
C&F Bank		146,307	12.8			51,622	4.5			74,565	6.5
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Tangible Assets)
Corporation		144,819	10.3			56,463	4.0			N/A	N/A
C&F Bank		146,307	10.2			57,097	4.0			71,371	5.0

The regulatory risk-based capital amounts presented above include: (1) common equity tier 1 capital (CET1) which consists principally of common stock (including surplus) and retained earnings with adjustments for goodwill, intangible assets and deferred tax assets; (2) Tier 1 capital which consists principally of CET1 plus the Corporation’s “grandfathered” trust preferred securities; and (3) Tier 2 capital which consists principally of Tier 1 capital plus a limited amount of the allowance for loan losses. In addition, the Corporation has made the one-time irrevocable election to continue treating

Table of Contents

accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) under regulatory standards that were in place prior to the Basel III Final Rule in order to eliminate volatility of regulatory capital that can result from fluctuations in AOCI and the inclusion of AOCI in regulatory capital, as would otherwise be required under the Basel III Capital Rule. For additional information about the Basel III Final Rules, see “Item 1. Business” under the heading “Regulation and Supervision” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” under the heading “Note 15: Regulatory Requirements and Restrictions” in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

In addition to the regulatory risk-based capital amounts presented above, the Corporation and the Bank must maintain a capital conservation buffer of additional total capital and CET1 as required by the Basel III Final Rule. The buffer began applying to the Corporation and the Bank on January 1, 2016, and is subject to phase-in from 2016 to 2019 in equal annual installments of 0.625%. Accordingly, at March 31, 2017, the Corporation and the Bank were required to maintain a capital conservation buffer of 1.25%. At March 31, 2017, the Corporation exceeded the total capital conservation buffer by 507 basis points, and the Bank exceeded the total capital conservation buffer by 518 basis points. Also at March 31, 2017, the Corporation and the Bank exceeded the CET1 capital conservation buffer by 625 basis points and 740 basis points, respectively.

The Corporation's capital resources may be further affected by the Corporation's Repurchase Program, which was reauthorized by the Corporation's Board of Directors during the second quarter of 2016. Under this program the Corporation is authorized to purchase up to $5.0 million of its common stock. Repurchases under the program may be made through privately-negotiated transactions or open-market transactions, and shares repurchased will be returned to the status of authorized and unissued shares of common stock. The timing, number and purchase price of shares repurchased under the program will be determined by management in its discretion and will depend on a number of factors, including the market price of the shares, general market and economic conditions, applicable legal requirements and other conditions. The Repurchase Program is authorized through May 2017. As of March 31, 2017, $5.0 million of the Corporation's common stock may be purchased under the Corporation's share repurchase program.

Effects of Inflation and Changing Prices

The Corporation's financial statements included herein have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. U.S. GAAP presently requires the Corporation to measure financial position and operating results primarily in terms of historic dollars. Changes in the relative value of money due to inflation or recession are generally not considered. The primary effect of inflation on the operations of the Corporation is reflected in increased operating costs. In management's opinion, changes in interest rates affect the financial condition of a financial institution to a far greater degree than changes in the inflation rate. While interest rates are greatly influenced by changes in the inflation rate, they do not necessarily change at the same rate or in the same magnitude as the inflation rate. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond the control of the Corporation, including changes in the expected rate of inflation, the influence of general and local economic conditions and the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States government, its agencies and various other governmental regulatory authorities.

ITEM 3.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There have been no significant changes from the quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk made in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

ITEM 4.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Corporation’s management, including the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2017 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that such information is

Table of Contents

accumulated and communicated to the Corporation’s management, including the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures will detect or uncover every situation involving the failure of persons within the Corporation or its subsidiary to disclose material information required to be set forth in the Corporation’s periodic reports.

Management of the Corporation is also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). There were no changes in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting during the Corporation’s first quarter ended March 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes in the risk factors faced by the Corporation from those disclosed in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

ITEM 2.UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

As previously described, the Corporation has a Repurchase Program that is authorized through May 2017. As of March 31, 2017, $5.0 million of the Corporation’s common stock, which is the total amount authorized, may be purchased under the Repurchase Program.

The following table summarizes repurchases of the Corporation’s common stock that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2017.


					Maximum Number
					(or Approximate
				Total Number of	Dollar Value) of
				Shares Purchased as	Shares that May Yet
				Part of Publicly	Be Purchased
	Total Number of	Average Price Paid		Announced Plans or	Under the Plans or
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)	Shares Purchased	per Share		Programs	Programs
January 1, 2017 - January 31, 20171	4,049	$	45.82	—	$	5,000
February 1, 2017 - February 28, 2017	—		—	—		5,000
March 1, 2017 - March 31, 2017	—		—	—		5,000
Total	4,049	$	45.82	—	$	5,000

These shares were withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations arising upon the vesting of restricted shares. Accordingly, these shares are not included in the calculation of approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the Repurchase Program.

Table of Contents

ITEM 6.EXHIBITS


2.1	Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of June 10, 2013 by and among C&F Financial Corporation, Special Purpose Sub, Inc. and Central Virginia Bankshares, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed June 14, 2013)

3.1	Articles of Incorporation of C&F Financial Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-KSB filed March 29, 1996)

3.1.1	Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of C&F Financial Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.1 to Form 8-K filed January 14, 2009)

3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of C&F Financial Corporation, as adopted February 23, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed February 29, 2016)

10.9	C&F Financial Corporation Management Incentive Plan dated February 21, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Form 10-K filed March 7, 2017)


31.1	Certification of CEO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

31.2	Certification of CFO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

32	Certification of CEO/CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document

__________

*Indicates management contract

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


		C&F FINANCIAL CORPORATION
			(Registrant)

Date:	May 8, 2017	By:	/s/ Larry G. Dillon
			Larry G. Dillon
			Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
			(Principal Executive Officer)

Date:	May 8, 2017		/s/ Jason E. Long
			Jason E. Long
			Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
			(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

C & F FINANCIAL CORP - FORM 10-Q - May 8, 2017

Attached files

C & F FINANCIAL CORP Reports