FNB BANCORP/CA/ - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-32 - EXHIBIT 32 - FNB BANCORP/CA/	ex32.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - FNB BANCORP/CA/	ex31_2.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - FNB BANCORP/CA/	ex31_1.htm

United States

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Quarterly Report

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2017

FNB BANCORP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

California

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)

000-49693	91-2115369
(Commission File Number)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

975 El Camino Real, South San Francisco, California	94080
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:	(650) 588-6800

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o	Emerging growth company o
Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: Common Stock as of March 31, 2017: 4,874,246 shares.

FNB BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page No
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited):	3

	Consolidated Balance Sheets	3

	Consolidated Statements of Earnings	4

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings	5

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	8

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	32

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	45

Item 4	Controls and Procedures	45

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION		46

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	46

Item 1 A.	Risk Factors	46

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	47

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	47

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	47

Item 5.	Other Information	47

Item 6.	Exhibits	47

SIGNATURES		48

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

FNB BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)

Assets	March 31,			December 31,
(Dollar amounts in thousands)	2017			2016

Cash and due from banks	$	25,337		$	15,758
Interest-bearing time deposits with financial institutions		205			205
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value		353,364			360,105
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $10,144 and $10,167 on March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016		807,191			782,485
Bank premises, equipment, and leasehold improvements, net		9,571			9,837
Bank-owned life insurance, net		16,349			16,247
Other equity securities		7,211			7,206
Accrued interest receivable		4,785			4,942
Other real estate owned, net		1,443			1,427
Goodwill		4,580			4,580
Prepaid expenses		768			856
Other assets		15,917			15,746
Total assets	$	1,246,721		$	1,219,394

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Deposits
Demand, noninterest bearing	$	287,029		$	296,273
Demand, interest bearing		125,643			121,086
Savings and money market		496,697			487,763
Time		115,622			114,384
Total deposits		1,024,991			1,019,506

Federal Home Loan Bank advances		86,000			71,000
Note Payable		4,200			4,350
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		17,198			14,224
Total liabilities		1,132,389			1,109,080

Stockholders’ equity
Common stock, no par value, authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 4,874,246 shares at March 31, 2017 and 4,853,415 shares at December 31, 2016		84,603			84,283
Retained earnings		29,842			27,577
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax		(113	)		(1,546	)
Total stockholders’ equity		114,332			110,314
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,246,721		$	1,219,394

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

FNB BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(Unaudited)

	Three months ended
	March 31,
(Dollar amounts and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)	2017		2016
Interest income
Interest and fees on loans	$	10,073	$	9,871
Interest on taxable securities		1,210		978
Interest on tax-exempt securities		733		707
Interest on deposits with other financial institutions		11		9
Total interest income		12,027		11,565
Interest expense
Interest on deposits		636		783
Interest on FHLB advances		146		8
Interest on note payable		53		57
Total interest expense		835		848
Net interest income		11,192		10,717
Provision for loan losses		—		75
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		11,192		10,642
Noninterest income
Service charges		597		621
Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities		28		184
Bank-owned life insurance policy earnings		102		100
Other income		283		229
Total noninterest income		1,010		1,134
Noninterest expense
Salaries and employee benefits		4,774		4,938
Occupancy expense		651		631
Equipment expense		402		434
Professional fees		473		387
FDIC assessment		130		150
Telephone, postage and supplies		297		295
Advertising		108		117
Data processing expense		139		192
Low income housing expense		105		71
Surety insurance		84		87
Directors expense		72		72
Other real estate owned expense (income), net		10		(10	)
Other expense		360		423
Total noninterest expense		7,605		7,787
Earnings before provision for income taxes		4,597		3,989
Provision for income taxes		1,508		1,422
Net earnings	$	3,089	$	2,567

Earnings per share data:
Basic	$	0.63	$	0.54
Diluted	$	0.62	$	0.52

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		4,867		4,777
Diluted		5,012		4,921

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

FNB BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings
(Unaudited)

	Three months ended
	March 31,
	2017			2016
Net earnings	$	3,089		$	2,567
Unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax expense of ($1,005) and ($1,639)		1,450			2,359
Reclassifiation adjustment for gain recognized on available-for-sale securities sold, net of tax benefit of $11 and $75 for the three months ended March 31,2017 and 2016, respectively		(17	)		(109	)
Total other comprehensive earnings		1,433			2,250
Total comprehensive earnings	$	4,522		$	4,817

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

FNB BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(Dollar amounts in thousands)	Three months ended
	March 31,
	2017			2016
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net earnings	$	3,089		$	2,567
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net gain on sale of securities available-for-sale		(28	)		(184	)
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		992			928
Stock-based compensation expense		103			88
Earnings on bank owned life insurance		(102	)		(100	)
Provision for loan losses		—			75
Decrease (increase) in net deferred loan fees		(70	)		69
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable		157			(92	)
Decrease in prepaid expense		88			52
(Increase) decrease in other assets		(171	)		522
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities		2,031			(64	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		6,089			3,861

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of securities available-for-sale		(9,408	)		(16,415	)
Proceeds from matured/called/sold securities available-for-sale		17,862			19,563
Investment, net of redemption, in other equity securities		(5	)		(8	)
Investment in other real estate owned		(16	)		(29	)
Net increase in loans		(24,636	)		(11,388	)
Purchases of bank premises, equipment, leasehold improvements		(35	)		(386	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(16,238	)		(8,663	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

FNB BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)

	Three months ended
	March 31,
	2017			2016
Cash flows from financing activities
Net increase in demand and savings deposits	$	4,247		$	48,082
Net increase (decrease) in time deposits		1,238			(1,020	)
Increase (decrease) in FHLB advances		15,000			(17,000	)
Principal reduction on note payable		(150	)		(150	)
Dividends paid on common stock		(824	)		(34	)
Exercise of stock options		217			347
Net cash provided by financing activities		19,728			30,225
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		9,579			25,423
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		15,758			12,314
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	25,337		$	37,737

Additional cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	855		$	840
Income taxes paid	$	—		$	202

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Accrued dividends	$	780		$	683
Change in unrealized gain in available for-sale securities, net of tax	$	1,433		$	2,250

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

FNB BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE A – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

FNB Bancorp (the “Company”) is a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of California on February 28, 2001. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of FNB Bancorp and its wholly-owned subsidiary, First National Bank of Northern California (the “Bank”). The Bank provides traditional banking services in San Mateo and San Francisco counties.

All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The financial statements include all adjustments of a normal and recurring nature, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes normally included in annual financial statements prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, these consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated audited financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2016. Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. Certain prior year information has been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. The reclassifications had no impact on consolidated net earnings or stockholders’ equity.

NOTE B – STOCK OPTION PLANS

Stock option expense is recorded based on the fair value of option contracts issued. The fair value is determined by using an option pricing model that considers the expected contract term, the risk free interest rate, the volatility of the Company’s stock price and the level of dividends the Company is expected to pay.

Measurement of the cost of the stock options granted is based on the grant-date fair value of each stock option using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The cost is then amortized over each option’s requisite service period. The expected term of options granted is derived from the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding. The risk free rate is based on the yield of an equivalent maturity U.S. Treasury note. Volatility is calculated using historical price changes on a monthly basis over the option’s expected life.

As of January 1, 2017, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This ASU seeks to simplify income tax consequences, classification of awards, and classification on the statement of cash flows. By applying this ASU, the Company no longer adjusts common stock for the tax impact of shares released, instead the tax impact is recognized as tax expense in the period the shares are released.

The amount of stock option compensation expense recorded in the quarters ended March

31, 2017 and 2016 was $103,000 and $88,000, respectively. There was an income tax benefit recognized in the consolidated statements of earnings of $74,000 for the quarters ended March 31, 2017 related to the exercise of stock options and the sale of the underlying stock. There was no benefit recorded during the first quarter of 2016.

The intrinsic value for options exercised during the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016 was $495,000 and $405,000, respectively. The intrinsic value of options exercisable during the quarter ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016 was $4,927,000 and $3,682,000, respectively.

The amount of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested options at March 31, 2017 was $1,420,000, and the weighted average period over which it will be amortized is 3.4 years.

NOTE C – EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATION

Earnings per common share (EPS) are computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted average of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. The number of potential common shares included in the quarterly diluted EPS is computed using the average market price during the three months included in the reporting period under the treasury stock method. The number of potential common shares included in year-to-date diluted EPS is a year-to-date weighted average of potential shares included in each quarterly diluted EPS computation. All common stock equivalents are anti-dilutive when a net loss occurs. A 5% stock dividend was declared in the fourth quarter of 2016, and prior per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the 5% stock dividend.

Earnings per share have been computed based on the following:


(Dollar amounts in thousands)	Three months ended
	March 31,
	2017		2016
Net earnings	$	3,089	$	2,567

Average number of shares outstanding		4,867,000		4,777,000
Effect of dilutive options		145,000		144,000
Average number of shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per share		5,012,000		4,921,000

Anti dilutive options that were excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS totaled 115,000 and 52,000 at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

NOTE D – SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE

The amortized cost and carrying values of securities available-for-sale are as follows:

(Dollar amounts in thousands)	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	cost		gains		losses			value
March 31, 2017
U.S. Treasury securities	$	979	$	9	$	—		$	988
Obligations of U.S. government agencies		52,736		106		(290	)		52,552
Mortgage-backed securities		87,608		390		(1,471	)		86,527
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		148,542		2,035		(886	)		149,691
Corporate debt		63,691		258		(343	)		63,606
	$	353,556	$	2,798	$	(2,990	)	$	353,364
December 31, 2016
U.S. Treasury securities	$	977	$	10	$	—		$	987
Obligations of U.S. government agencies		60,773		112		(340	)		60,545
Mortgage-backed securities		85,709		397		(1,822	)		84,284
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		151,988		1,458		(1,828	)		151,618
Corporate debt		63,277		121		(727	)		62,671
	$	362,724	$	2,098	$	(4,717	)	$	360,105

An analysis of gross unrealized losses of the available-for-sale investment securities portfolio as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, is as follows:

(Dollar amounts in thousands)			Less than					12 Months
	Total		12 Months			Total		or Longer			Total		Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
March 31, 2017
Obligations of U.S. government agencies		31,920		(290	)		—		—			31,920		(290	)
Mortgage-backed securities		63,518		(1,438	)		1,427		(33	)		64,945		(1,471	)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		55,168		(833	)		2,201		(53	)		57,369		(886	)
Corporate debt		33,344		(343	)		—		—			33,344		(343	)
Total	$	183,950	$	(2,904	)	$	3,628	$	(86	)	$	187,578	$	(2,990	)

(Dollar amounts in thousands)			Less than					12 Months
	Total		12 Months			Total		or Longer			Total		Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
December 31, 2016
Obligations of U.S. government agencies		36,828		(340	)		—		—			36,828		(340	)
Mortgage-backed securities		67,990		(1,822	)		—		—			67,990		(1,822	)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		84,728		(1,828	)		—		—			84,728		(1,828	)
Corporate debt		41,012		(727	)		—		—			41,012		(727	)
Total	$	230,558	$	(4,717	)	$	—	$	—		$	230,558	$	(4,717	)

At March 31, 2017, there were 6 securities in an unrealized loss position for greater than 12 consecutive months. At the same time, there were 168 securities in an unrealized loss position for 12 or less than 12 consecutive months. At December 31, 2016, there were no securities in an unrealized loss position for greater than 12 consecutive months, and there were 227 securities in an unrealized loss position for less than consecutive months. Management periodically evaluates each security in an unrealized loss position to determine if the impairment is temporary or other-than-temporary. The unrealized losses are due solely to interest rate changes and the Company does not intend to sell nor expects it will be required to sell investment securities identified with impairments prior to the earliest of forecasted recovery or the maturity of the underlying investment security. Management has determined that no investment security was other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2017.

The amortized cost and carrying value of available-for-sale debt securities as of March 31, 2017 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

March 31, 2017:


(Dollar amounts in thousands)	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value
Available-for-sale:
Due in one year or less	$	32,291	$	32,400
Due after one through five years		141,122		141,746
Due after five years through ten years		54,614		54,734
Due after ten years		125,529		124,484
	$	353,556	$	353,364

For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively, gross realized gains amounted to $28,000 and $184,000, on gross securities sold or called of $10,781,000 and $12,282,000, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, there were no gross realized losses.

At March 31, 2017, securities with an amortized cost of $114,139,000 and fair value of $113,634,000 were pledged as collateral for public deposits and for other purposes required by law.

NOTE E - LOANS

Loans are summarized as follows at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

								Total
	FNB							Balance
	Bancorp							March 31,
(Dollar amounts in thousands)	Originated			PNCI		PCI		2017
Commercial real estate	$	362,336		$	67,734	$	1,225	$	431,295
Real estate construction		49,490			—		—		49,490
Real estate multi-family		100,861			12,050		—		112,911
Real estate 1 to 4 family		152,787			16,586		—		169,373
Commercial & industrial		42,049			7,228		—		49,277
Consumer loans		6,065			—		—		6,065
Gross loans		713,588			103,598		1,225		818,411
Net deferred loan fees		(1,076	)		—		—		(1,076	)
Allowance for loan losses		(10,144	)		—		—		(10,144	)
Net loans	$	702,368		$	103,598	$	1,225	$	807,191

								Total
	FNB							Balance
	Bancorp							December 31,
(Dollar amounts in thousands)	Originated			PNCI		PCI		2016
Commercial real estate	$	351,261		$	68,736	$	1,225	$	421,222
Real estate construction		43,683			—		—		43,683
Real estate multi-family		90,763			15,200		—		105,963
Real estate 1 to 4 family		153,843			16,680		—		170,523
Commercial & industrial		40,140			8,734		—		48,874
Consumer loans		3,533			—		—		3,533
Gross loans		683,223			109,350		1,225		793,798
Net deferred loan fees		(1,142	)		—		—		(1,146	)
Allowance for loan losses		(10,167	)		—		—		(10,167	)
Net loans	$	671,914		$	109,350	$	1,225	$	782,485

Note: PNCI means Purchased, Not Credit Impaired. PCI means Purchased, Credit Impaired. These designations are assigned to the purchased loans on their date of purchase. Once the loan designation has been made, each loan will retain its designation for the life of the loan.

Loan Classifications:

Real Estate – Multi-Family

Our multi-family commercial real estate loans are secured by multi-family properties located primarily in San Mateo and San Francisco counties. These loans are made to investors where our primary source of repayment is from cash flows generated by the properties, through rent collections. The borrowers’ promissory notes are secured with recorded liens on the underlying properties. The borrowers would normally also be required to personally guarantee repayment of the loans. The Bank uses conservative underwriting standards in reviewing applications for credit. Generally, our borrowers have multiple sources of income, so if cash flow generated from the property declines, at least in the short term, the borrowers can normally cover these short term cash flow deficiencies from their available cash reserves. Risk of loss to the Bank is increased when there are cash flow decreases sufficiently large and for such a prolonged period of time that loan payments can no longer be made by the borrowers.

Commercial Real Estate Loans

Commercial real estate loans consist of loans secured by non-farm, non-residential properties, including, but not limited to industrial, hotel, assisted care, retail, office and mixed use buildings. Our commercial real estate loans are made primarily to investors or small businesses where our primary source of repayment is from cash flows generated by the properties, either through rent collection or business profits. The borrower’s promissory notes are secured with recorded liens on the underlying property. The borrowers would normally also be required to personally guarantee repayment of the loan. The Bank uses conservative underwriting standards in reviewing applications for credit. Generally, our borrowers have multiple sources of income, so if cash flow generated from the property declines, at least in the short term, the borrowers can normally cover these short term cash flow deficiencies from their available cash reserves. Risk of loss to the Bank is increased when there are cash flow decreases sufficiently large and for such a prolonged period of time that loan payments can no longer be made by the borrowers.

Real Estate Construction Loans

Our real estate construction loans are generally made to borrowers who are rehabilitating a building, converting a building use from one type of use to another, or developing land and building residential or commercial structures for sale or lease. The borrower’s promissory notes are secured with recorded liens on the underlying property. The borrowers would normally also be required to personally guarantee repayment of the loan. The Bank uses conservative underwriting standards in reviewing applications for credit. Generally, our borrowers have sufficient resources to make the required construction loan payments during the construction and absorption or lease-up period. After construction is complete, the loans are normally paid off from proceeds from the sale of the building or through a refinance to a commercial real estate loan. Risk of loss to the Bank is increased when there are material construction cost overruns, significant delays in the time to complete the project and/or there has been a material drop in the value of the projects in the marketplace since the inception of the loan.

Real Estate-1 to 4 Family Loans

Our residential real estate loans are generally made to borrowers who are buying or refinancing their primary personal residence or a rental property of 1-4 single family residential units. The Bank uses conservative underwriting standards in reviewing applications for credit. Risk of loss to the Bank is increased when borrowers lose their primary source of income and/or property values decline significantly.

Commercial and Industrial Loans

Our commercial and industrial loans are generally made to small businesses to provide them with at least some of the working capital necessary to fund their daily business operations. These loans are generally either unsecured or secured by fixed assets, accounts receivable and/or inventory. The borrowers would normally also be required to personally guarantee repayment of the loan. The Bank uses conservative underwriting standards in reviewing applications for credit. Risk of loss to the Bank is increased when our small business customers experience a significant business downturn, incur significant financial losses, or file for relief from creditors through bankruptcy proceedings.

Consumer Loans

Our consumer and installment loans generally consist of personal loans, credit card loans, automobile loans or other loans secured by personal property. The Bank uses conservative underwriting standards in reviewing applications for credit. Risk of loss to the Bank is increased when borrowers lose their primary source of income, or file for relief from creditors through bankruptcy proceedings.

	Recorded Investment in Loans at March 31, 2017

(Dollar amounts in thousands)
					Real		Real
					Estate		Estate
	Commercial		Real Estate		Multi		1 to 4		Commercial
	Real Estate		Construction		Family		Family		& industrial		Consumer		Total

Loans:
Ending balance	$	431,295	$	49,490	$	112,911	$	169,373	$	49,277	$	6,065	$	818,411

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	10,390	$	831	$	—	$	4,391	$	971	$	—	$	16,583

Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment	$	420,905	$	48,659	$	112,911	$	164,982	$	48,306	$	6,065	$	801,828

	Recorded Investment in Loans at December 31, 2016

(Dollar amounts in thousands)
					Real		Real
					Estate		Estate
	Commercial		Real Estate		Multi		1 to		Commercial
	Real Estate		Construction		family		4 family		& industrial		Consumer		Total

Loans:
Ending balance	$	421,222	$	43,683	$	105,963	$	170,523	$	48,874	$	3,533	$	793,798

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	10,023	$	843	$	—	$	3,530	$	1,065	$	—	$	15,461

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	411,199	$	42,840	$	105,963	$	166,993	$	47,809	$	3,533	$	778,337

	Recorded Investment in Loans at March 31, 2016

(Dollar amounts in thousands)
					Real		Real
					Estate		Estate
	Commercial		Real Estate		Multi		1 to		Commercial
	Real Estate		Construction		family		4 family		& industrial		Consumer		Total

Loans:
Ending balance	$	412,083	$	42,466	$	59,899	$	173,532	$	55,608	$	1,675	$	745,263

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	10,700	$	2,102	$	—	$	4,115	$	1,572	$	—	$	18,489

Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment	$	401,383	$	40,364	$	59,899	$	169,417	$	54,036	$	1,675	$	726,774

The following tables provide information pertaining to impaired loans originated and PNCI loans as of and for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2016.

	Impaired Loans
	As of and for the quarter ended March 31, 2017

			Unpaid				Average
(Dollar amounts in thousands)	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized

With no related allowance recorded
Commercial real estate	$	8,900	$	10,023	$	—	$	8,923	$	32
Commercial real estate construction		831		1,022		—		837		9
Residential- 1 to 4 family		1,547		1,547		—		1,551		21
Commercial & industrial		119		119		—		119		2
Total		11,397		12,711		—		11,430		64

With an allowance recorded
Commercial real estate	$	1,490	$	1,490	$	39	$	1,498	$	20
Commercial real estate construction		—		—		—		—		—
Residential- 1 to 4 family		2,844		2,869		434		2,848		28
Commercial & industrial		852		852		84		879		0
Total		5,186		5,211		557		5,225		48

Total
Commercial real estate	$	10,390	$	11,513	$	39	$	10,421	$	52
Commercial real estate construction		831		1,022		—		837		9
Residential- 1 to 4 family		4,391		4,416		434		4,399		49
Commercial & industrial		971		971		84		998		2
	$	16,583	$	17,922	$	557	$	16,655	$	112

	Impaired Loans
	As of and for the year ended December 31, 2016

			Unpaid				Average
(Dollar amounts in thousands)	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized

With no related allowance recorded
Commercial real estate	$	8,516	$	9,026	$	—	$	9,730	$	716
Commercial real estate construction		843		843		—		857		—
Residential- 1 to 4 family		678		678		—		685		—
Commercial and industrial		120		120		—		322		25
Total		10,157		10,667		—		11,594		794

With an allowance recorded
Commercial real estate	$	1,507	$	1,507	$	50	$	1,528	$	89
Residential- 1 to 4 family		2,852		2,852		442		3,202		157
Commercial and industrial		945		945		96		1,240		1
Total		5,304		5,304		588		5,970		247

Total
Commercial real estate	$	10,023	$	10,533	$	50	$	11,258	$	805
Commercial real estate construction		843		843		—		857		53
Residential- 1 to 4 family		3,530		3,530		442		3,887		157
Commercial and industrial		1,065		1,065		96		1,562		26
Grand total	$	15,461	$	15,971	$	588	$	17,564	$	1,041

	Impaired Loans
	As of and for the quarter ended March 31, 2016

			Unpaid				Average
(Dollar amounts in thousands)	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized

With no related allowance recorded
Commercial real estate	$	8,075		9,164	$	—	$	9,212	$	232
Commercial real estate construction		2,102		2,285		—		2,311		37
Residential- 1 to 4 family		468		468		—		457		8
Commercial & industrial		516	$	516		—		522		7
Total		11,161		12,433		—		12,502		284

With an allowance recorded
Commercial real estate	$	2,625	$	2,629	$	89	$	2,641	$	38
Commercial real estate construction		—		—		—		—		—
Residential- 1 to 4 family		3,647		3,669		460		3,250		35
Commercial & industrial		1,056		1,272		105		1,303		—
Total		7,328		7,570		654		7,194		73

Total
Commercial real estate	$	10,700	$	11,793	$	89	$	11,853	$	270
Commercial real estate construction		2,102		2,285		—		2,311		37
Residential - 1 to 4 family		4,115		4,137		460		3,707		43
Commercial & industrial		1,572		1,788		105		1,825		7
Grand total	$	18,489	$	20,003	$	654	$	19,696	$	357

Nonaccrual loans totaled $8,444,000 and $6,647,000 as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. Impaired loans not on nonaccrual are loans that have been restructured and are performing under modified loan agreements, and where principal and interest is determined to be collectible. Nonaccrual loans are loans where principal and interest have not been determined to be fully collectible.

	Loans on Nonaccrual Status as of
(Dollar amounts in thousands)	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
Commercial real estate	$	6,835	$	5,553
Real estate - 1 to 4 family		749		149
Commercial & industrial		852		945
Consumer		8		—
Total	$	8,444	$	6,647

Interest income on impaired loans of $112,000 and $1,041,000 was recognized for cash payments received during the quarter ended March 31, 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2016, respectively. Interest income on impaired loans recognized for cash payments received for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was $357,000.

The amount of interest on impaired loans not collected for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was $225,000 and $132,000, respectively. The cumulative amount of unpaid interest on impaired loans was $825,000 and $547,000 as of March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

	Total troubled debt restructured loans outstanding at
(Dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2017						December 31, 2016
			Non-						Non-
	Accrual		accrual		Total		Accrual		accrual		Total
	status		status		modifications		status		status		modifications

Commercial real estate	$	3,556	$	4,982	$	8,538	$	4,446	$	4,494	$	8,960
Real estate construction		—		—		—		—		—		—
Real estate 1 to 4 family		4,241		—		4,241		3,381		—		3,381
Commercial & industrial		119		850		969		120		902		1,022
Total	$	7,916	$	5,832	$	13,748	$	7,947	$	5,396	$	13,363

Modification Categories

The Company offers a variety of modifications to borrowers. The modification categories offered can generally be described in the following categories.

Rate Modification – A modification in which the interest rate is changed.

Term modification – A modification in which the maturity date, timing of payments, or frequency of payments is changed.

Interest Only Modification – A modification in which the loan is converted to interest only payments for a period of time.

Payment Modification – A modification in which the dollar amount of the payment is changed, other than an interest only modification described above.

There were no commitments for additional funding of troubled debt restructured loans as of March 31, 2017. There were no payment defaults during the three month periods ended March 31, 2017 or March 31, 2016 that were related to receivables modified as TDRs in the last twelve months. There were no TDRs entered into during the 3 months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

	Allowance for Credit Losses
	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
					Real			Real
					Estate			Estate
	Commercial		Real Estate		Multi			1 to			Commercial
	Real Estate		Construction		Family			4 Family			& industrial			Consumer			Total
Allowance for credit losses

Beginning balance	$	6,392	$	617	$	389		$	2,082		$	650		$	37		$	10,167
Charge-offs		—		—		—			—			(39	)		(1	)		(40	)
Recoveries		2		—		—			8			7			—			17
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses		249		10		(143	)		(266	)		36			114			—
Ending balance	$	6,643	$	627	$	246		$	1,824		$	654		$	150		$	10,144

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	39	$	—	$	—		$	434		$	84		$	—		$	577

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for	$	6,604	$	627	$	246		$	1,390		$	570		$	150		$	9,587

	Allowance for Credit Losses
	As of and For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
					Real		Real
					Estate		Estate
	Commercial		Real Estate		Multi		1 to			Commercial
	Real estate		Construction		family		4 family			& industrial			Consumer			Total
Allowance for credit losses

Beginning balance	$	6,059	$	589	$	243	$	2,176		$	853		$	50		$	9,970
Charge-offs		—		—		—		(36	)		(164	)		(18	)		(218	)
Recoveries		8		—		—		53			204			—			265
Provision		325		28		146		(111	)		(243	)		5			150
Ending balance	$	6,392	$	617	$	389	$	2,082		$	650		$	37		$	10,167

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	50	$	—	$	—	$	442		$	96		$	—		$	588

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	6,342	$	617	$	389	$	1,640		$	554		$	37		$	9,579

	Allowance for Credit Losses
	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
						Real			Real
						Estate			Estate
	Commercial		Real Estate			Multi			1 to			Commercial
	Real estate		Construction			family			4 family			& industrial			Consumer			Total
Allowance for credit losses

Beginning balance	$	6,059	$	589		$	243		$	2,176		$	853		$	50		$	9,970
Charge-offs		—		—			—			—			(164	)		(5	)		(169	)
Recoveries		2		—			—			12			53			—			67
Provision		52		(2	)		(32	)		(39	)		99			(3	)		75
Ending balance	$	6,113	$	587		$	211		$	2,149		$	841		$	42		$	9,943

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	89	$	—		$	—		$	460		$	105		$	—		$	654

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	6,024	$	587		$	211		$	1,689		$	736		$	42		$	9,289

	Age Analysis of Past Due Loans
	As of March 31, 2017
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
	30-59		60-89
	Days		Days		Over		Total
	Past		Past		90		Past				Total
Originated	Due		Due		Days		Due		Current		Loans
Commercial real estate	$	820	$	1,303	$	—	$	2,123	$	360,213	$	362,336
Real estate construction		2,310		—		—		2,310		47,180		49,490
Real estate multi family		—		—		—		—		100,861		100,861
Real estate-1 to 4 family		974		—		673		1,647		151,140		152,787
Commercial & industrial		344		—		852		1,196		40,853		42,049
Consumer		—		—		—		—		6,605		6,605
Total	$	4,448	$	1,303	$	1,525	$	7,276	$	706,312	$	713,588

Purchased
Not credit impaired
Commercial real estate	$	358	$	—	$	4,307	$	4,665	$	63,069	$	67,734
Real estate construction		—		—		—		—		—		—
Real estate multi-family		—		—		—		—		12,050		12,050
Real estate-1 to 4 family		—		—		76		76		16,510		16,586
Commercial & industrial		—		—		—		—		7,228		7,228
Total	$	—	$	—	$	4,383	$	4,741	$	98,857	$	103,598

Purchased
Credit impaired
Commercial real estate	$	—	$	—	$	1,225	$	1,225	$	—	$	1,225
Total	$	—	$	—	$	1,225	$	1,225	$	—	$	1,225

At March 31, 2017, there were no loans that were 90 days or more past due where interest was still accruing.

The over 90 days column includes nonaccruals that were over 90 days, but does not include loans that are in nonaccrual status for reasons other than past due.

	Age Analysis of Past Due Loans
	As of December 31, 2016
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
	30-59		60-89
	Days		Days		Over		Total
	Past		Past		90		Past				Total
Originated	Due		Due		Days		Due		Current		Loans
Commercial real estate	$	835	$	2	$	—	$	837	$	350,424	$	351,261
Real estate construction		645		—		—		645		43,038		43,683
Real estate multi family		—		—		—		—		90,763		90,763
Real estate 1 to 4 family		1,365		61		74		1,500		152,343		153,843
Commercial & industrial		241		—		945		1,186		38,954		40,140
Consumer		—		—		—		—		3,533		3,533
Total	$	3,086	$	63	$	1,019	$	4,168	$	679,055	$	683,223

Purchased
Not credit impaired
Commercial real estate	$	1,869	$	1,909	$	550		4,328	$	64,408	$	68,736
Real estate multi-family		—		—		—		—		15,200		15,200
Real estate 1 to 4 family				—		75		75		16,605		16,680
Commercial & industrial		285		—		—		285		8,449		8,734
Total	$	2,154	$	1,909	$	625	$	4,688	$	104,662	$	109,350

Purchased
Credit impaired
Commercial real estate	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,225	$	1,225
Total	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,225	$	1,225

At December 31, 2016, there were no loans that were 90 days or more past due where interest was still accruing.

The over 90 days column includes nonaccrual loans that were over 90 days, but does not include loans that are in nonaccrual status for reasons other than past due.

Risk rating system

Loans to borrowers graded as pass or pooled loans represent loans to borrowers of acceptable or better credit quality. They demonstrate sound financial positions, repayment capacity and credit history. They have an identifiable and stable source of repayment.

Special mention loans have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s attention. If left uncorrected these potential weaknesses may result in a deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the Bank’s credit position at some future date. These assets are “not adversely classified” and do not expose the Bank to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.

Substandard loans are inadequately protected by current sound net worth, paying capacity of the borrower, or pledged collateral. Loans are normally classified as Substandard when there are unsatisfactory characteristics causing more than acceptable levels of risk. A substandard loan normally has one or more well-defined weaknesses that could jeopardize the repayment of the debt. For example, a) cash flow deficiency, which may jeopardize future payments; b) sale of non-collateral assets has become primary source of repayment; c) the borrower is bankrupt; or d) for any other reason, future repayment is dependent on court action.

Doubtful loans represent credits with weakness inherent in the Substandard classification and where collection or liquidation in full is highly questionable. To be classified Doubtful, there must be specific pending factors which prevent the Loan Review Officer from determining the amount of loss contained in the credit. When the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated, that amount is classified as Loss and the remainder is classified as Substandard.

	Credit Quality Indicators
	As of March 31, 2017

(Dollar amounts in thousands)
			Special		Sub-				Total
Originated	Pass		mention		standard		Doubtful		loans
Commercial real estate	$	359,479	$	—	$	2,857	$	—	$	362,336
Real estate construction		48,659		—		831		—		49,490
Real estate multi-family		100,861		—		—		—		100,861
Real estate-1 to 4 family		152,039		—		748		—		152,787
Commercial & industrial		41,715		—		332		2		42,049
Consumer loans		6,065		—		—		—		6,065
Totals	$	708,818	$	—	$	4,768	$	2	$	713,588

Purchased
Not credit impaired
Commercial real estate	$	60,137	$	896	$	6,701	$	—	$	67,734
Real estate construction		—		—		—		—		—
Real estate multi-family		12,050		—		—		—		12,050
Real estate-1 to 4 family		16,586		—		—		—		16,586
Commercial & industrial		7,228		—		—		—		7,228
Total	$	96,001	$	896	$	6,701	$	—	$	103,598

Purchased
Credit impaired
Commercial real estate									$	1,225
Total									$	1,225

	Credit Quality Indicators
	As of December 31, 2016

(Dollar amounts in thousands)
			Special		Sub-				Total
Originated	Pass		mention		standard		Doubtful		loans
Commercial real estate	$	348,785	$	902	$	1,574	$	—	$	351,261
Real estate construction		42,840		—		843		—		43,683
Real estate multi-family		90,763		—		—		—		90,763
Real estate 1 to 4 family		153,769		—		74		—		153,843
Commercial & industrial		39,752		—		384		4		40,140
Consumer loans		3,533		—		—		—		3,533
Totals	$	679,442	$	902	$	2,875	$	4	$	683,223

Purchased
Not credit impaired
Commercial real estate	$	61,705	$	—	$	7,031	$	—	$	68,736
Real estate multi-family		15,200		—		—		—		15,200
Real estate 1 to 4 family		16,605		—		75		—		16,680
Commercial & industrial		8,644		—		90		—		8,734
Total	$	102,154	$	—	$	7,121	$	—	$	109,350

Purchased
Credit impaired
Commercial real estate									$	1,225
Total									$	1,225

NOTE F - BORROWINGS

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

As of March 31, 2017, there were $86,000,000 in Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) borrowings outstanding, consisting of $10,000,000 at 0.65% due April 18, 2017; $15,000,000 at 0.67% due May 1, 2017; $18,000,000 at 0.68% due April 28, 2017; $18,000,000 at 0.70% due May 30, 2017; $10,000,000 at 0.90% due April 13, 2017 and $15,000,000 at 0.93% due June 27, 2017.

Corporate loan

On March 27, 2014, FNB Bancorp received funding under a $6,000,000 term loan credit facility. This loan carries a variable rate of interest that fluctuates on a monthly basis. The interest rate is based on the 3 month LIBOR rate plus 4%. Payments of $50,000 in principal plus accrued interest are payable monthly. The first loan payment was due May 1, 2014. The maturity date on this credit facility is March 26, 2019. On the maturity date, all outstanding principal plus accrued interest shall become due and payable. FNB Bancorp has pledged its stock ownership in First National Bank of Northern California as collateral subject to the terms and conditions contained in the Loan Agreement and the Pledge and Security Agreement. FNB Bancorp retains the right to prepay this debt at any time upon not less than 7 days’ prior written notice to Lender.

The proceeds from this loan were contributed to the Bank as an additional capital contribution. This capital contribution qualified as Tier 1 capital for the Bank under regulatory capital guidelines. The balance outstanding under this loan agreement was $4,200,000 as of March 31, 2017. At the maturity date of March 26, 2019 the expected remaining principal amount outstanding of $3,000,000 will become due and payable.

NOTE G – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and indicates the fair value techniques used by the Company to determine such fair value. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy and recognized on the actual date of the event or circumstances that caused the transfer, which generally corresponds with the Company’s quarterly valuation process. During the first three months of 2017 and 2016 there were no transfers of assets or liabilities between hierarchy levels.

The following tables present the recorded amounts of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

			Fair Value Measurements
(Dollar amounts in thousands)			at March 31, 2017, Using
			Quoted Prices
			in Active
			Markets		Other		Significant
			for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Fair Value		Assets		Inputs		Inputs
Description	3/31/2017		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
U. S. Treasury securities	$	988	$	988	$	—	$	—
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies		52,552		—		52,552		—
Mortgage-backed securities		86,527		—		86,527		—
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		149,691		—		149,691		—
Corporate debt		63,606		—		63,606		—
Total assets measured at fair value	$	353,364	$	988	$	352,376	$	—

			Fair Value Measurements
(Dollar amounts in thousands)			at December 31, 2016, Using
			Quoted Prices
			in Active
			Markets		Other		Significant
			for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Fair Value		Assets		Inputs		Inputs
Description	12/31/2016		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
U. S. Treasury securities	$	987	$	987	$	—	$	—
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies		60,545		—		60,545		—
Mortgage-backed securities		84,284		—		84,284		—
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		151,618		—		151,618		—
Corporate debt		62,671		—		62,671		—
Total assets measured at fair value	$	360,105	$	987	$	359,118	$	—

The following tables present the recorded amounts of assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:

			Fair Value Measurements
(Dollar amounts in thousands)			at March 31, 2017, Using
			Quoted Prices in
			Active Markets		Other		Significant
			for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Fair Value		Assets		Inputs		Inputs
Description	3/31/2017		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Impaired loans:
Commercial real estate loans	$	1,225	$	—	$	—	$	1,225
Real estate construction		831		—		—		831
Residential - 1 to 4 family loans		74		—		—		74
Total impaired assets measured at fair value	$	2,130	$	—	$	—	$	2,130

			Fair Value Measurements
(Dollar amounts in thousands)			at December 31, 2016, Using
			Quoted Prices in
			Active Markets		Other		Significant
			for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Fair Value		Assets		Inputs		Inputs
Description	12/31/2016		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Impaired loans:
Residential-1 to 4 family loans	$	67	$	—	$	—	$	67
Commercial and industrial loans		815		—		—		815
Other real estate owned		1,427		—		—		1,427
Total impaired assets measured at fair value	$	2,309	$	—	$	—	$	2,309

The Bank does not record loans at fair value. However, from time to time, if a loan is considered impaired, a specific allocation within the allowance for loan losses may be required. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans.

Impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral or when the impaired loan has been written down to fair value require classification in the fair value hierarchy. If the fair value of the collateral is based on a non-observable market price or a current appraised value, the Bank records the impaired loans as nonrecurring Level 3. When an appraised value is not available, or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Bank also records the impaired loans as nonrecurring Level 3.

Other real estate owned is carried at the lower of historical cost or fair value less costs to sell. An appraisal (a Level 3 valuation) is obtained at the time the Bank acquires property through the foreclosure process. Any loan balance outstanding that exceeds the appraised value of the property is charged off against the allowance for loan loss at the time the property is acquired. Subsequent to acquisition, the Bank updates the property’s appraised value on at least an annual basis. If the value of the property has declined during the year, a loss due to valuation impairment charge is recorded along with a corresponding reduction in the book carrying value of the property. Historical costs of other real estate owned were below fair value estimates at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

The Bank obtains third party appraisals on its impaired loans held-for-investment and foreclosed assets to determine fair value. When the appraisals are received, Management reviews the assumptions and methodology utilized in the appraisal, as well as the overall resulting value in conjunction with independent data sources such as recent market data and industry-wide statistics. We generally use a 6% discount for selling costs which is applied to all properties, regardless of size. Generally, the third party appraisals apply the “market approach,” which is a valuation technique that uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable (that is, similar) assets, liabilities, or a group of assets and liabilities, such as a business. Adjustments are then made based on the type of property, age of appraisal, current status of property and other related factors to estimate the current value of collateral. The value of OREO is determined based on independent appraisals, similar to the process used for impaired loans, discussed above, and is generally classified as Level 3.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value disclosures for financial instruments.

Cash and Cash Equivalents, including interest-bearing time deposits with financial institutions.

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and short-term instruments are a reasonable estimate of fair value, which will approximate their historical cost.

Securities Available-for-Sale.

Fair values for investment securities are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments.

Loans Receivable.

For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values and credit risk factors. For fixed rate loans, fair values are based on discounted cash flows, credit risk factors, and liquidity factors. The ALLL is considered a reasonable estimate of loan discount for credit quality concerns.

Other equity securities.

These are mostly Federal Reserve Bank stock and Federal Home Loan Bank stock, carried in Other Assets. They are not traded, and not available for sale, but rather have a stated value that does not change.

Deposit liabilities.

The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and non-interest checking, savings, and money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). The fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are based on discounted cash flows.

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances.

The fair values of Federal Home Loan Bank Advances are based on discounted cash flows. The discount rate is equal to the market rate currently offered on similar products.

Notes payable.

Fair value is equal to the current balance. They represent a corporate loan with a monthly variable rate, based on the 3-month LIBOR rate plus 4%.

Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable.

The interest receivable and payable balances approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of their settlement dates.

Undisbursed loan commitments, lines of credit, Mastercard line and standby letters of credit.

The fair value of these off-balance sheet items are based on discounted cash flows of expected fundings.

The Bank has excluded non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities defined by the Codification (ASC 820-10-15-A), such as Bank premises and equipment, deferred taxes and other liabilities. In addition, the Bank has not disclosed the fair value of financial instruments specifically excluded from disclosure requirements of the Financial Instruments Topic of the Codification (ASC 825-10-50-8), such as Bank-owned life insurance policies.

The following table provides summary information on the estimated fair value of financial instruments at March 31, 2017:

March 31, 2017	Carrying		Fair		Fair value measurements
(Dollar amounts in thousands)	amount		value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	25,337	$	25,337	$	25,337
Interest-bearing time deposits with financial institutions		205		205			$	205
Securities available for sale		353,364		353,364		988		352,376
Loans		807,191		794,503					$	794,503
Other equity securities		7,211		7,211						7,211
Accrued interest receivable		4,785		4,785		4,785

Financial liabilities:

Deposits		1,024,991		1,025,648		956,523		69,125
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		86,000		86,000				86,000
Note payable		4,200		4,200				4,200
Accrued interest payable		226		226		226

Off-balance-sheet liabilities:
Undisbursed loan commitments, lines of credit, standby letters of credit and Mastercard lines of credit		—		1,767						1,767

The carrying amount of loans include $8,444,000 of nonaccrual loans (loans that are not accruing interest) as of March 31, 2017. The fair value of nonaccrual loans is based on the collateral values that secure the loans or the cash flows expected to be received.

The following table provides summary information on the estimated fair value of financial instruments at December 31, 2016:

December 31, 2016	Carrying		Fair		Fair value measurements
(Dollar amounts in thousands)	amount		value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	15,758	$	15,758	$	15,758
Interest-bearing time deposits with financial institutions		205		205			$	205
Securities available for sale		360,105		360,105		987		359,118
Loans		782,485		769,661					$	769,661
Other equity securities		7,206		7,206						7,206
Accrued interest receivable		4,942		4,942		4,942

Financial liabilities:

Deposits		1,019,506		1,020,088		951,743		68,345
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		71,000		71,000				71,000
Note payable		4,350		4,350				4,350
Accrued interest payable		246		246		246

Off-balance-sheet liabilities:
Undisbursed loan commitments, lines of credit, standby letters of credit and Mastercard lines of credit		—		1,733						1,733

The carrying amounts of loans include $6,647,000 of nonaccrual loans (loans that are not accruing interest) as of December 31, 2016. The fair value of nonaccrual loans is based on the collateral values that secure the loans or the cash flows expected to be received.

NOTE H – INVESTMENT IN LOW INCOME HOUSING

The bank has a cost method net investment in low income housing projects of $1,719,000 and $1,825,000 as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. These investments generated federal income tax credits of $$64,000 and $65,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. These low income housing projects provide tax benefits for approximately 15 years. These investments are not expected to have any residual value at the end of the tax benefit period and the book value of these investments is reduced by each project’s net operating expense. The net operating expense was $38,000 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016.

NOTE I - SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On March 31, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a 3-for-2 forward stock split of the Company’s Common Stock to be payable in the form of additional shares of common stock. The stock additional shares will be distributed on May 26, 2017 to stockholders of record on May 5, 2017. The NASDAQ has established an ex-dividend date of May 30, 2017. Upon completion of the stock split, the number of issued and outstanding shares of FNB Bancorp Common Stock will increase from approximately 4.87 million to approximately 7.31 million common shares outstanding. Share and per share data presented in the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements have not been adjusted for the stock split.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Forward-Looking Information and Uncertainties Regarding Future Financial Performance.

This discussion of financial results includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the “1933 Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “1934 Act”). Those sections of the 1933 Act and 1934 Act provide a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective information about their financial performance so long as they provide meaningful, cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ significantly from projected results.

Our forward-looking statements include descriptions of plans or objectives of Management for future operations, products or services, and forecasts of revenues, earnings or other measures of economic performance. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They often include the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate” or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs preceded by “will,” “would,” “should,” “could” or “may.”

Forward-looking statements are based on Management’s current expectations regarding economic, legislative, and regulatory issues that may affect our earnings in future periods. A number of factors, many of which are beyond Management’s control, could cause future results to vary materially from current Management expectations. Such factors include, but are not limited to, general economic and political considerations, and the economic uncertainty in the United States and abroad, including changes in interest rates, deposit flows, real estate values, and expected future cash flows on loans and securities; integration of acquisitions; competition; changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines; changes in legislation or regulation; adverse weather conditions, including droughts in California; and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting our operations, pricing, products and services.

Important factors that could cause results or performance to materially differ from those expressed in our prior forward-looking statements are detailed in Item 1A. Risk Factors section of our 2016 Form 10-K as filed with the SEC, copies of which are available from us at no charge. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. We do not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to its loans and allowance for loan losses. The Company bases its estimates on current market conditions, historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

All adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation for the periods presented have been reflected as required by Regulation S-X, Rule 10-01. The Company believes the following critical accounting policy requires significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is periodically evaluated for adequacy by management. Factors considered include the Company’s loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, current economic conditions, known adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, regulatory policies, and the estimated value of underlying collateral. The evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is based on the above factors along with prevailing and anticipated economic conditions that may impact our borrowers’ ability to repay their loans.

Determination of the allowance is based upon objective and subjective judgments by management from the information currently available. Adverse changes in information could result in higher than expected charge-offs and loan loss provisions.

Goodwill

Goodwill arises when the Company’s purchase price exceeds the fair value of the net assets of an acquired business. Goodwill represents the value attributable to intangible elements acquired. The value of goodwill is supported ultimately by profit from the acquired business. A decline in earnings could lead to impairment, which would be recorded as a write-down in the Company’s consolidated statements of earnings. Events that may indicate goodwill impairment include significant or adverse changes in results of operations of the acquired business or asset, economic or political climate; an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; unanticipated competition; and a more-likely-than-not expectation that a reporting unit will be sold or disposed of at a loss.

Other Than Temporary Impairment

Other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”) is triggered if the Company has the intent to sell the security, it is likely that it will be required to sell the security before recovery, or if the Company does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. If the Company intends to sell the security or it is likely it will be required to sell the security before recovering its cost basis, the entire impairment loss would be recognized in earnings as an OTTI. If the Company does not intend to sell the security and it is not likely that the Company will be required to sell the security but the Company does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security, only the portion of the impairment loss representing credit losses would be recognized in earnings as an OTTI. The credit loss is measured as the difference between the amortized cost basis and the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected of a security. Projected cash flows are discounted by the original or current effective interest rate depending on the nature of the security being measured for potential OTTI. The remaining impairment loss related to all other factors, the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and fair value, would be recognized as a charge to other comprehensive income (“OCI”). Impairment losses related to all other factors are to be presented as a separate category within OCI.

For investment securities held to maturity, this amount is accreted over the remaining life of the debt security prospectively based on the amount and timing of future estimated cash flows. The accretion of the OTTI amount recorded in OCI will increase the carrying value of the investment, and would not affect earnings. If there is an indication of additional credit losses the security is re-evaluated accordingly based on the procedures described above.

Provision for and Deferred Income Taxes

The Company is subject to income tax laws of the United States, its states, and the municipalities in which it operates. The Company considers its income tax provision methodology to be critical, as the determination of current and deferred taxes based on complex analyses of many factors including interpretation of federal and state laws, the difference between tax and financial reporting bases of assets and liabilities (temporary differences), estimates of amounts due or owed, the timing of reversals of temporary differences and current financial standards. Actual results could differ significantly from the estimates due to tax law interpretations used in determining the current and deferred income tax liabilities. Additionally, there can be no assurances that estimates and interpretations used in determining income tax liabilities may not be challenged by federal and state tax authorities.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2016 FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-overall (subtopic 825-10) Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. Before the global financial crisis that began in 2008, both the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) began a joint project to improve and to achieve convergence of their respective standards on the accounting for financial instruments. The global economic crisis further highlighted the need for improvement in the accounting models for financial instruments in today’s complex economic environment. As a result, the main objective in developing this Update is enhancing the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update address certain aspects of recognition measurement. In addition, the amendment requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes and requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measuring category and form of financial asset on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company has begun the process to implement this new standard. The Company is reviewing all revenue sources to determine the sources that are in scope for this guidance. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016 FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The FASB is issuing this Update to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The core principle of Topic 842 is that a lessee should recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases. All leases create an asset and a liability for the lessee in accordance with FASB Concepts Statement No. 6, Elements of Financial Statements, and, therefore, recognition of those lease assets and lease liabilities represents an improvement over previous GAAP, which did not require lease assets and lease liabilities to be recognized for most leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Although an estimate of the impact on the new leasing standard has not yet been determined, the Company expects a significant new lease asset and related liability to be recorded on the balance sheet due to the number of branch facilities that are subject to a formal Lease agreement.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606); Principal versus agent considerations (reporting revenue gross versus net). The core principle of the guidance in Topic 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The amendments in this Update do not change the core principle of the guidance. The amendments clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. When another party is involved in providing goods or services to a customer, an entity is required to determine whether the nature of its promise to provide the specified good or service itself (that is, the entity is a principal) or to arrange for that good or service to be provided by the other party (that is, the entity is an agent). When (or as) an entity that is a principal satisfies a performance obligation, the entity recognizes revenue in the gross amount of consideration to which it expects to be entitled in exchange for the specified good or service transferred to the customer. When (or as) an entity that is an agent satisfies a performance obligation, the entity recognizes revenue in the amount of any fee or commission to which it expects to be entitled in exchange for arranging for the specified good or service to be provided by the other party. ASU 2016-08 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. As part of that evaluation, the Company is reviewing all our customer relationships in order to determine whether an agency exists, and if it does, whether the Company needs to change the way we recognize income related to that relationship.

In June 2016 FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326). Measurement of Credit Losses. The amendments in this Update require a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The allowance for credit losses is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset(s) to present the net carrying value at the amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. The income statement reflects the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets, as well as the expected increases or decreases of expected credit losses that have taken place during the period. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. This ASU update addresses eight cash flow classification issues related to: debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; settlement of zero coupon debt instruments; contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; proceeds from the payment of insurance claims; proceeds from the settlement of corporate owned life insurance policies, including bank owned life insurance policies; distributions received from equity method investees; beneficial interests in securitization transactions; and separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principal. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of this Update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-03, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (Topic 250) and Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323). This ASU amends the Codification for SEC Staff Announcements made at recent Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) meetings. The SEC staff expressed their expectations about the extent of disclosures registrant should make about the effects of the new FASB guidance as well as any amendments issued prior to adoption, or revenue (ASU 2014-09), leases (ASU 2016-02) and credit losses on financial instruments (ASU 2106-013). In accordance with SAB Topic M, Registrants are required to disclose the effect that recently issued accounting standards will have on their financial statements when adopted in a future period. In cases where a registrant cannot reasonably estimate the impact of the adoption, then additional qualitative disclosures should be considered. This ASU was effective upon issuance. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topc350). Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, the Board eliminated Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. In computing the implied fair value of goodwill under Step 2, an entity had to perform procedures to determine the fair value, at the impairment testing date, of its assets and liabilities (including unrecognized assets and liabilities) following the procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Instead, under the amendments in this Update, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment testing by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Additionally, an entity should consider income tax effects from any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable. The Board also eliminated the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount of net assets. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. This Update also includes amendments to the Overview and Background Sections of the Codification (as discussed in Part II of the amendments) as part of the Board’s initiative to unify and improve the Overview and Background Sections across Topics and Subtopics. These changes should not affect the related guidance in these Subtopics. This update is effective for interim and annual fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The adoption of this Update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-08, Receivables – Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20). Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities. This Update was issued in order to shorten the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium to the earliest call date. This amendment does not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. Before this update was issued, previous generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) allowed purchased premiums to be amortized as an adjustment of yield over the contractual life of the instrument. Stakeholders raised concerns that current GAAP excludes certain callable debt securities from consideration of early repayment of principal even if the holder is certain that the call will be exercised. As a result, upon the exercise of a call on a callable debt security held at a premium, the unamortized premium is recorded as a loss in earnings. Additionally, stakeholders told the Board that there is diversity in practice (1) in the amortization period for premiums of callable debt securities and (2) in how the potential for exercise of a call is factored into current impairment assessments. Stakeholders noted that generally, in the United States, callable debt securities are quoted, priced, and traded assuming a model that incorporates consideration of calls (also referred to as “yield-to-worst” pricing). For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The adoption of this Update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Earnings Analysis

Net interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 was $11,192,000 compared to $10,717,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2016, an increase of $475,000, or 4%. Yields on interest earning assets declined 14 basis points when comparing the first quarter of 2017 to the same quarter in 2016. Net interest income is the primary determinant in our ability to generate sustainable earnings.

The following table presents an analysis of net interest income and average earning assets and liabilities for the three-month period ended March 31, 2017 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2016.

TABLE 1	NET INTEREST INCOME AND AVERAGE BALANCES FNB BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY

	Three months ended March 31,
	2017							2016
(Dollar amounts In thousands)					Annualized							Annualized
	Average				Average			Average				Average
	Balance		Interest		Yield			Balance		Interest		Yield
INTEREST EARNING ASSETS
Loans, gross (1) (2)	$	807,741	$	10,073		5.06	%	$	743,282	$	9,871		5.34	%
Taxable securities (3)		219,857		1,210		2.23	%		201,677		978		1.95	%
Nontaxable securities (3)		135,706		982		2.93	%		127,626		941		2.97	%
Federal funds sold		—		—		n/a			—		—		n/a
Interest time deposits-other fin institutions		5,114		11		0.87	%		10,101		9		0.36	%
Total interest earning assets		1,168,418		12,276		4.26	%		1,082,686		11,799		4.38	%

NONINTEREST EARNING ASSETS:
Cash and due from banks		15,275							24,723
Premises and equipment		9,720							10,211
Other assets		39,865							38,768
Total noninterest earning assets		64,860							73,703
TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,233,278						$	1,156,389

INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES:
Demand, interest bearing	$	123,675		28		0.09	%	$	108,825		38		0.14	%
Money market		400,081		389		0.39	%		434,187		521		0.48	%
Savings		89,149		22		0.10	%		81,473		23		0.11	%
Time deposits		114,577		197		0.70	%		124,938		201		0.65	%
FHLB advances		89,344		146		0.66	%		6,714		8		0.48	%
Note payable		5,732		53		3.75	%		4,890		57		4.69	%
Total interest bearing liabilities		822,558		835		0.41	%		761,027		848		0.45	%

NONINTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES:
Demand deposits		285,583							262,845
Other liabilities		15,211							16,402
Total noninterest bearing liabilities		300,794							279,247

TOTAL LIABILITIES		1,123,352							1,040,274
Stockholders’ equity		109,926							106,219

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	1,233,278						$	1,146,493

NET INTEREST INCOME AND MARGIN ON TOTAL EARNING ASSETS (4)			$	11,441		3.97	%			$	10,951		4.07	%

1) Interest on non-accrual loans is recognized into income on a cash received basis if the loan has demonstrated performance and full collection is considered probable.

2) Amounts of interest earned included loan fees of $389.000 and $579,000 for the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

3) Tax equivalent adjustments recorded at the statutory rate of 34% that are included in the nontaxable securities portfolio are $249,000 and $234,000 for the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and were derived from nontaxable municipal interest income.

4) The annualized net interest margin is computed by dividing net interest income by total average interest earning assets and multiplied by an annualization factor.

The Net Interest Income and Average Balances table, above, shows the various components that contributed to changes in net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. The principal interest earning assets are loans, from a volume as well as from an earnings rate perspective. Yields on loans have increased during the first quarter of 2017 due to prepayment penalties realized on loans that were repaid prior to maturity.

For the quarter ended March 31, 2017, average gross loans outstanding represented 69% of average earning assets. For the quarter ended March 31, 2016, they also represented 69% of average earning assets.

Interest earning assets consist primarily of loans that are originated by or purchased by the Bank and investment securities that are purchased from broker dealers. An investment in loans is the Bank’s most valuable earning asset. Deposit liabilities are obtained through the Bank’s branch offices. Demand deposits are the Bank’s most profitable deposit account.

During the first quarter of 2017, the Company recognized $307,000 of interest income related to accelerated accretion of the remaining discount associated with a loan acquired in the America California Bank acquisition that was paid in full.

TABLE 2
	RATE/VOLUME VARIANCE ANALYSIS

(Dollar amounts in thousands)	Three months ended March 31,
	2017 compared to 2016

	Increase (decrease) (2)
	Interest			Variance
	Income/expense			Attributable to
	Variance			Rate			Volume
INTEREST EARNING ASSETS
Loans	$	202		$	(602	)	$	804
Taxable securities		232			132			100
Nontaxable securities (1)		41			(17	)		58
Int time deposits-other financial institutions		2			13			(11	)
Total		477			(474	)		951
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES
Demand deposits		10			15			(5	)
Money market		132			91			41
Savings		1			3			(2	)
Time deposits		4			(14	)		18
FHLB advances		(138	)		(3	)		(135	)
Note payable		4			12			(8	)
Total		13			104			(91	)
NET INTEREST INCOME	$	490		$	(370	)	$	860


	(1)	Includes tax equivalent adjustments of $249,000 and $234,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2017, and March 31, 2016, respectively.

(2)

Increases (decreases) shown are in relation to their effect on net interest income.

Noninterest income

The following table shows the principal components of noninterest income for the periods indicated.

TABLE 3	NONINTEREST INCOME

(Dollar amounts in thousands)	Three months ended March 31,				Variance
	2017		2016		Amount			Percent
Service charges	$	597	$	621	$	(24	)		-3.9	%
Gain on available-for-sale securities		28		184		(156	)		-84.8	%
Bank owned life insurance policy earnings		102		100		2			2.0	%
Other income		283		229		54			23.6	%
Total noninterest income	$	1,010	$	1,134	$	(124	)		-10.9	%

Noninterest income consists mainly of service charges on deposits, and earnings on bank owned life insurance policies. During the first quarter of 2017, the Bank sold approximately $11,266,000 in investment securities for a pre-tax gain of $28,000. During the first quarter of 2016, the Bank sold $12,282,000 in investment securities for a pre-tax gain of $184,000.

Noninterest expense

The following table shows the principal components of noninterest expense for the periods indicated.

TABLE 4	NONINTEREST EXPENSE

(Dollar amounts in thousands)	Three months ended March 31,					Variance
	2017		2016			Amount			Percent
Salaries and employee benefits	$	4,774	$	4,938		$	(164	)		-3.3	%
Occupancy expense		651		631			20			3.2	%
Equipment expense		402		434			(32	)		-7.4	%
Professional fees		473		387			86			22.2	%
FDIC assessment		130		150			(20	)		-13.3	%
Telephone, postage & supplies		297		295			2			0.7	%
Advertising expense		108		117			(9	)		-7.7	%
Data processing expense		139		192			(53	)		-27.6	%
Low income housing expense		105		71			34			47.9	%
Surety insurance		84		87			(3	)		-3.4	%
Directors expense		72		72			—			n/a
Other real estate owned expense, net		10		(10	)		20			200.0	%
Other expense		360		423			(63	)		-14.9	%
Total noninterest expense	$	7,605	$	7,787		$	(182	)		-2.3	%

Decreased salary and employee benefits expenses in the first quarter of 2017 was the result of unfilled, open staffing positions. Data processing expense returned to more historical levels. During the first quarter of 2016, this increase in this expense was related to expenses associated with the America California Bank acquisition that occurred late in the third quarter of 2015.

Provision for Loan Losses

There was no provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2017. There was a provision for loan losses of $75,000 for the same period in 2016. The allowance for loan losses was $10,144,000 or 1.24% of total gross loans at March 31, 2017, compared to $10,167,000 or 1.28% of total gross loans at December 31, 2016. During the first quarter of 2017, $40,000 in loans were charged off, compared to $169,000 in the same period in 2016. The overall quality of the remaining portfolio did not warrant a larger provision for loan losses during the quarter. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate for management to provide for probable loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio.

Income Taxes

The effective tax rate for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 was 32.8% compared to 35.7% for the quarter ended March 31, 2016. Tax preference items which otherwise lowered our effective tax rate below full statutory rates during the first quarter of 2017 and 2016 included non-taxable interest income derived from municipal loans and investment securities and available Low Income Housing tax credits.

Asset and Liability Management

Ongoing management of the Company’s interest rate sensitivity limits interest rate risk through monitoring the mix and maturity of loans, investments and deposits. Management regularly reviews the Company’s position and evaluates alternative sources and uses of funds as well as changes in external factors. Various methods are used to achieve and maintain the desired interest rate sensitivity position including the sale or purchase of assets and product pricing.

In order to ensure that sufficient funds are available for loan growth and deposit withdrawals, as well as to provide for general needs, the Company must maintain an adequate level of liquidity. Asset liquidity comes from the Company’s ability to convert short-term investments into cash and from the maturity and repayment of loans and investment securities. Liability liquidity comes from the Company’s customer base, which provides core deposit growth. The overall liquidity position of the Company is closely monitored and evaluated regularly. Management believes the Company’s liquidity sources at March 31, 2017, are adequate to meet its operating needs in 2017 and our liquidity positions are sufficient to meet our liquidity needs in the near term.

Financial Condition

Assets. Total assets increased to $1,246,721,000 at March 31, 2017 from $1,219,394,000 at December 31, 2016, an increase of $27,327,000. The principal source of this increase was an increase of $24,706,000 in net loans that were funded by an increase in deposit liabilities of $5,485,000 and an increase of $15,000,000 in Federal Home Loan Bank advances.

Loans. The loan portfolio breakdown as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was as follows:

TABLE 5	LOAN PORTFOLIO

	March 31			Percent			December 31			Percent
(Dollar amounts in thousands)	2017						2016
Commercial real estate	$	431,295			53	%	$	421,222			53	%
Real estate construction		49,490			6	%		43,683			6	%
Real estate multi family		112,911			14	%		105,963			13	%
Real estate 1 to 4 family		169,373			21	%		170,523			22	%
Commercial & industrial		49,277			6	%		48,874			6	%
Consumer loans		6,065			1	%		3,533			0	%
Gross loans		818,411			100	%		793,798			100	%
Net deferred loan fees		(1,076	)		0	%		(1,146	)		0	%
Total	$	817,335			100	%	$	792,652			100	%

Allowance for loan losses. Management of the Company is responsible for assessing the overall risks within the Bank’s loan portfolio, assessing the specific loss expectancy, and determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. The level of the allowance is determined by internally generating credit quality ratings, reviewing economic conditions in the Company’s market area, and considering the Company’s historical loan loss experience. The Company’s management considers changes in national and local economic conditions, as well as the condition of various market segments. It also reviews any changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio. Management watches for the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and changes in the level of such concentrations. It also reviews the effect of external factors, such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements. Finally, the Company is committed to maintaining an adequate allowance, identifying credit weaknesses by consistent review of loans, and maintaining the ratings and changing those ratings in a timely manner as circumstances change.

A summary of transactions in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2017, and March 31, 2016, respectively is as follows:

TABLE 6	ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

	Three months ended			Three months ended
(Dollar amounts in thousands)	March 31, 2017			March 31, 2016
Balance, beginning of period	$	10,167		$	9,970
Provision for loan losses		—			75
Recoveries		17			67
Amounts charged off		(40	)		(169	)
Balance, end of period	$	10,144		$	9,943

During the first quarter of 2017, there was no provision for loan losses. During the same period in 2016, the provision was $75,000. The provision level was considered appropriate given the declining risk levels within the Bank’s loan portfolio.

In management’s judgment, the allowance is adequate to absorb probable losses currently inherent in the loan portfolio at March 31, 2017. However, changes in prevailing economic conditions in the Company’s markets or in the financial condition of its customers could result in changes in the level of nonperforming assets and charge-offs in the future and, accordingly, changes in the allowance.

The allowance is affected by a number of factors, and does not necessarily move in tandem with the level of gross loans outstanding. Management continues to monitor the factors that affect the allowance, and is prepared to make adjustments as they become necessary.

Nonperforming assets. Nonperforming assets consist of nonaccrual loans, loans that are 90 days or more past due but are still accruing interest and other real estate owned. At March 31, 2017, there was $9,887,000 in nonperforming assets, compared to $8,074,000 at December 31, 2016. Nonaccrual loans were $8,444,000 at March 31, 2017, compared to $6,647,000 at December 31, 2016. There were no loans past due 90 days and still accruing at either date.

There was $1,443,000 in other real estate owned at March 31, 2017, and $1,427,000 at December 31, 2016. Management intends to aggressively market our other real estate owned. While management believes these properties will sell, there can be no assurance that these properties will sell quickly given the current real estate market, nor can the expected sales price be accurately predicted.

Deposits. Total deposits at March 31, 2017, were $1,024,991,000 compared to $1,109,506,000 on December 31, 2016. Of these totals, noninterest-bearing demand deposits were $287,029.000 or 28% of the total on March 31, 2017, and $296,273,999 or 29% on December 31, 2016. Time deposits were $115,622,000 on March 31, 2017, and $114,384,000 on December 31, 2016.

The following table sets forth the maturity schedule of the time certificates of deposit on March 31, 2017:

TABLE 7

(Dollar amounts in thousands)	Under		$250,000
Maturities	$250,000		or more		Total
Three months or less	$	14,218	$	20,897	$	35,115
Over three through six months		9,818		9,896		19,714
Over six through twelve months		17,461		8,476		25,937
Over twelve months		26,970		7,886		34,856
Total	$	68,467	$	47,155	$	115,622

Regulatory Capital. The following table shows the risk-based capital ratios and leverage ratios at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

								Transitional						Well-capitalized
TABLE 8								Minimum			Minimum			by Regulatory
								Regulatory			Regulatory			Definition
								Requirement			Requirement			Under FDICIA
	At March 31, 2017							Effective			Effective			Effective
Regulatory Capital Ratios	Company			Bank				January 1, 2017			January 1, 2019			January 1, 2017
Leverage Ratio		8.92	%		9.12	%	≥		4.00	%		4.00	%		5.00	%
Common equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio		11.28	%		11.54	%	≥		4.50	%		7.00	%		6.50	%
Tier 1 Capital Ratio		11.28	%		11.54	%	≥		6.00	%		8.50	%		8.00	%
Total capital ratio		12.35	%		12.60	%	≥		8.00	%		10.50	%		10.00	%

								Transitional						Well-capitalized
								Minimum			Minimum			by Regulatory
								Regulatory			Regulatory			Definition
								Requirement			Requirement			Under FDICIA
	At December 31, 2016							Effective			Effective			Effective
Regulatory Capital Ratios	Company			Bank				January 1, 2016			January 1, 2019			January 1, 2016
Leverage Ratio		9.02	%		9.27	%	≥		4.00	%		4.00	%		5.00	%
Common equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio		11.32	%		11.59	%	≥		4.50	%		7.00	%		6.50	%
Tier 1 Capital Ratio		11.32	%		11.59	%	≥		6.00	%		8.50	%		8.00	%
Total capital ratio		12.42	%		12.68	%	≥		8.00	%		10.50	%		10.00	%

Liquidity. Liquidity is a measure of the Company’s ability to convert assets into cash with minimal loss. As of March 31, 2017, liquid assets were $378,906,000, or 30% of total assets. As of December 31, 2016, liquid assets were $376,068,000, or 31% of total assets. Liquidity consists of cash and due from banks, and securities available-for-sale. The Company’s primary uses of funds are loans, and the primary sources of funds are deposits. The Company also has federal funds borrowing facilities totaling $30,000,000, a Federal Home Loan Bank line up to 30% of total eligible assets, and a Federal Reserve Bank borrowing facility.

The relationship between total net loans and total deposits is a useful additional measure of liquidity. A higher loan to deposit ratio may lead to a loss of liquid assets in the future. This must be balanced against the fact that loans represent the highest interest earning assets. A lower loan to deposit ratio means lower potential income. On March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively, net loans were at 79% and 77% of deposits. See the consolidated statements of Cash Flows under Item 1 for further information on the Company’s cash flows.

Off-Balance Sheet Items

The Company has certain ongoing commitments under operating leases. These commitments do not significantly impact operating results. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, commitments to extend credit and letters of credit were the only financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk. The Company has not entered into any contracts for financial derivative instruments such as futures, swaps, options or similar instruments. Loan commitments and letters of credit were $176,694,000 and $173,256,000 at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. As a percentage of net loans, these off-balance sheet items represent 21.9% and 21.5% respectively. The Company does not believe all commitments are expected to be funded.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Market risk is the risk of loss to future earnings, to fair values of assets or to future cash flows that may result from changes in the price or value of a financial instrument. The value of a financial instrument may change as a result of changes in interest rates and other market conditions. Market risk is attributed to all market risk sensitive financial instruments, including loans, investment securities, deposits and borrowings. The Company does not engage in trading activities or participate in foreign currency transactions for its own account. Accordingly, exposure to market risk is primarily a function of asset and liability management activities and of changes in market rates of interest. Changes in rates can cause or require increases in the rates paid on deposits that may take effect more rapidly or may be greater than the increases in the interest rates that the Company is able to charge on loans and the yields that it can realize on its investments. The extent of that market risk depends on a number of variables including the sensitivity to changes in market interest rates and the maturities of the Company’s interest earning assets and deposits.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

(a)

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”) as of the end of the Company’s fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2017. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) and other members of the Company’s senior management. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that material information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files and submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required and that such information is communicated to the Company’s management, including the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions required disclosures. The evaluation did not identify any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management of FNB Bancorp (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, and for reporting an assessment of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2017. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparations of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transaction and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of Management and Directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

There are no material legal proceedings adverse to the Company or First National Bank to which any director, officer, affiliate of the Company, or 5% stockholder of the Company, or any associate of any such director, officer, affiliate or 5% stockholder of the Company are a party, and none of the foregoing persons has a material interest adverse to the Company or First National Bank.

From time to time, the Company and/or First National Bank are a party to claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company’s management is not aware of any material pending legal proceedings to which either it or First National Bank may be a party or has recently been a party, which will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company and First National Bank, taken as a whole.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

During the course of normal operations, the Bank and the Company manage a variety of risks including, but not limited to, credit risk, operational risk, interest rate risk and regulatory compliance risk. For a more complete discussion of the risk factors facing the Bank and the Company, please refer to the section entitled “Item 1A – Risk Factors” in the Company’s December 31, 2016 Form 10K.

On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Act”) was signed into law. The purpose of this legislation was to bring about regulatory changes and oversight that would help stop past abuses from recurring in the future. This legislation gives new powers to the FDIC and the Federal Reserve Bank that they may use in the execution of their duties as regulators and overseers of the banking industry. It also created a new federal consumer protection agency named the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”). All existing consumer laws and regulations will be transferred to the CFPB. This Act is expected to enable regulators to issue numerous new banking regulations and requirements that have not yet been fully developed or promulgated. The ultimate effect the Act has on the Company’s operations will ultimately be determined by the significance of the new banking regulations that are issued as a result of the Act.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

c) ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5. Other Information

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibits

31: Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

32: Section 1350 Certifications

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


		FNB BANCORP
		(Registrant)
Dated:

May 4, 2017.	By:	/s/ Thomas C. McGraw
		Thomas C. McGraw
		Chief Executive Officer
		(Authorized Officer)
		(Principal Executive Officer)


	By:	/s/ David A. Curtis
		David A. Curtis
		Senior Vice President
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

FNB BANCORP/CA/ - FORM 10-Q - May 4, 2017

Attached files

FNB BANCORP/CA/ Reports