Attached files

file filename
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - FBR & Co.d377543dex312.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - FBR & Co.d377543dex311.htm
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-K/A

Amendment No. 1

 

 

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

OR

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number: 001-33518

 

 

FBR & Co.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Virginia   20-5164223

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

1300 North Seventeenth Street, 14th Floor,

Arlington, VA

  22209
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

(703) 312-9500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

 

Name of Each Exchange on Which  Registered

Common Stock, Par Value $0.001   The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
  (The NASDAQ Global Select MarketSM)

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the act: None

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act:    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act:    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K/A or any amendment to this Form 10-K/A:    ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

 

Large Accelerated Filer      Accelerated Filer  
Non-Accelerated Filer      Smaller Reporting Company  

Emerging Growth Company  ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

The aggregate market value of FBR & Co.’s outstanding common stock held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2016 was approximately $88.0 million based on the closing price of the registrant’s common stock as reported on The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC. In determining this figure, the registrant has excluded all shares of common stock beneficially owned by its directors and executive officers and each person who beneficially owns 10 % or more of FBR & Co.’s outstanding common stock. By doing so, the registrant does not admit that such persons are affiliates within the meaning of Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or for any other purpose.

On April 20, 2017, there were 7,099,114 shares of FBR & Co. common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The following documents (or parts thereof) are incorporated by reference into the following parts of this Form 10-K/A:

None.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

EXPLANATION FOR AMENDMENT

This Amendment No. 1 to Form 10–K (this “Amendment”) amends the Annual Report on Form 10–K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Original Filing”), originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 13, 2017, of FBR & Co. We are filing this Amendment to provide the information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III not included in the Original Filing within the period required by General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K. The reference on the cover of the Original Filing to the incorporation by reference to portions of our definitive proxy statement into Part III of the Original Filing is hereby deleted.

As required by Rule 12b-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), this Amendment includes as exhibits the certifications required of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We have included Part IV, Item 15 in this Amendment solely to reflect the filing of these exhibits with this Amendment. We are not including certifications under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as no financial statements are being filed with this Amendment.

This Amendment does not reflect events occurring after the filing of the Original Filing or modify or update those disclosures affected by subsequent events. Except for the items described above or contained in this Amendment, this Amendment continues to speak as of the date of the Original Filing, and does not modify, amend or update in any way the financial statements or any other items or disclosures in the Original Filing. Accordingly, this Amendment should be read in conjunction with the Original Filing and our other filings made with the SEC.

Terms used in this Amendment have the same meaning as in the Original Filing unless otherwise indicated herein.

 

- i -


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

     Page  

PART III

     1  

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

     1  

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

     6  

ITEM  12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

     33  

ITEM  13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

     36  

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

     37  

PART IV

     39  

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS

     39  

 

- ii -


Table of Contents

PART III

 

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors of the Company

Our Board of Directors (the “Board”) is currently comprised of eight directors. Each director will hold office until our next annual meeting of shareholders and until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified, or until the director’s earlier resignation, death or removal. The following table sets forth the name, age and the position(s) with us, if any, currently held by each director:

 

Name

   Age     

Title

Richard J. Hendrix

     51      President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors

Reena Aggarwal(1) (2)

     59      Director

Thomas J. Hynes(2) (3)

     77      Director

Richard A. Kraemer(1) (3)

     72      Director

Allison M. Leopold Tilley(2) (3)

     53      Director

Mark R. Patterson(1) (2)

     50      Director

Arthur J. Reimers (2) (3) (4)

     62      Director

William F. Strome(1) (2)

     62      Director

 

(1) Member of the Audit Committee. Arthur J. Reimers and Allison M. Leopold Tilley were members of the Board’s Audit Committee until July 14, 2016.
(2) Member of the Compensation Committee.
(3) Member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. On July 14, 2016, the Board appointed Allison M. Leopold Tilley to the Board’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
(4) Lead Director

RICHARD J. HENDRIX, age 51, is our President, a position he has held since our formation in June 2006, and Chief Executive Officer, a position he has held since January 1, 2009. He has served as a director of our company since June 2006 and the Chairman of our Board of Directors since the first meeting of the Board following our 2012 annual meeting of shareholders. From February 2007 through February 2008, Mr. Hendrix served as a Member of the Office of the Chief Executive of Arlington Asset Investment Corp. (“Arlington Asset”), our previous parent company. From April 2004 to February 2007, Mr. Hendrix served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Arlington Asset. Between April 2003 and April 2004, Mr. Hendrix served as Chief Investment Officer of Arlington Asset. Prior to March 2003, Mr. Hendrix served as the President and Chief Operating Officer of FBR Asset Investment Corporation in addition to heading the Real Estate and Diversified Industrials Investment Banking Groups at FBR. Prior to joining FBR in 1999, Mr. Hendrix was a Managing Director of PNC Capital Markets’ (“PNC”) investment banking group. Mr. Hendrix previously also headed PNC’s asset-backed securities business. Mr. Hendrix joined PNC in 1987 and was appointed by PNC to work with FBR in 1997 in connection with a strategic alliance between the two companies. Mr. Hendrix is a member of the Board of Trustees of Flint Hill School. Mr. Hendrix has a Bachelor of Science in finance from Miami University.

Based on Mr. Hendrix’s 30 years of experience in the financial services industry, prior experience in a number of positions within our company, including as our President and Chief Executive Officer, our Board has determined that Mr. Hendrix is qualified to serve as a director.

REENA AGGARWAL, age 59, is a member of our Board of Directors, a position she has held since March 2011. She is the Vice Provost for Faculty at Georgetown University, a position she has held since 2016. Since 2009, Dr. Aggarwal has been the Robert E. McDonough Professor of Business Administration and since 2000, Professor of Finance at Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business. She has held various positions at Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business including Deputy Dean from 2006 to 2008 and Interim Dean from 2004 to 2005. She was a FINRA Academic Fellow in 2007 and 2008, a visiting Professor of Finance at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Sloan School of Management in 2005 and 2006, a Visiting Research Scholar at the International Monetary Fund during 2003 and 2004, an Academic Fellow at the SEC from 1997 through 1999, and a Fulbright Scholar to Brazil in 1990 and 1991. She is the Director of the Center for Financial Markets and Policy at Georgetown University. She has served on the World Economic Forum Global Agenda Council on the Future of Financing and Capital; and as a Distinguished Scholar at the Reserve Bank of India’s CAFRAL. Dr. Aggarwal has consulted for governments, law firms, companies, and for organizations including the IMF and World Bank. From 2006 through March 2011, Dr. Aggarwal served as a Trustee of The FBR Funds. She has served as a Trustee of IndexIQ by Main Stay Investments, a mutual fund company, since 2008, on the board of directors of Brightwood Capital Advisors, LLC, a private equity firm, since 2013, and on the board of directors of Cohen and Steers, since 2016. She has served on the advisory board of REAN Cloud, a cloud computing services company, since 2015. She has served on the board of the non-profit Georgetown Social Innovation and Public Service Fund from 2012 to 2014. Dr. Aggarwal has a Master of Management Studies from B.I.T.S. in Pilani, India and a Ph.D. in Finance from the University of Maryland.


Table of Contents

Based on Dr. Aggarwal’s expertise on matters relating to public offerings, institutional investors, stock markets, corporate governance and securities market regulations, our Board has determined that Dr. Aggarwal is qualified to serve as a director. In addition, our Board has determined that Dr. Aggarwal’s experience with accounting principles, financial reporting and evaluation of financial results qualifies her as an “audit committee financial expert” for purposes of membership on the Audit Committee.

THOMAS J. HYNES, JR., age 77, is a member of our Board of Directors, a position he has held since January 2007. Mr. Hynes is Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Colliers International-Boston, a commercial real estate services firm. Mr. Hynes has been employed by Colliers International-Boston and its predecessor companies since 1965, during which time he has held various offices including being appointed President in 1988 and Chairman in 2007. Mr. Hynes also serves as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Emmanuel College, a board member and member of the Executive Committee of A Better City, a non-profit membership organization supporting infrastructure investments in the Boston area, director of the Massachusetts Business Roundtable, a non- profit, non-partisan, statewide public affairs organization that represents Massachusetts’ leading industry and business enterprises, where he served as Chairman from 2004 to 2006, member of the Board of Trustees of Nativity Preparatory School, an accredited, tuition-free, Jesuit middle school serving boys of all faiths from low-income families residing in Boston and as a director of the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation. From October 1996 to January 2006, Mr. Hynes served as a director of Prentiss Properties Trust, a publicly-traded real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that was acquired by Brandywine Realty Trust in January 2006.

Based on Mr. Hynes’ experience in senior roles in the real estate services industry, his experience as a director of another public company, and his leadership position as Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Colliers International-Boston and senior executive officer positions with other organizations, our Board has determined that Mr. Hynes is qualified to serve as a director.

RICHARD A. KRAEMER, age 72, is a member of our Board of Directors, a position he has held since January 2007. Since May 2013, Mr. Kraemer has served as a director of Stonegate Mortgage Corporation, a publicly-traded mortgage company, and from September 28, 2015 through April 29, 2016, served as its interim Chief Executive Officer. Stonegate Mortgage Corporation has been, is and may continue to be an investment banking client of our company. Mr. Kraemer served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Saxon Capital Inc., a publicly-traded mortgage REIT, from 2001 through December 2006. Mr. Kraemer also served as a trustee and member of the Audit Committee of American Financial Realty Trust, a publicly-traded REIT, from 2002 through March 2008, and as a director of Urban Financial Group, Inc., a bank holding company from 2001 to 2013. From 1996 to 1999, Mr. Kraemer was Vice Chairman of Republic New York Corporation, a publicly-traded holding company for Republic National Bank. From 1993 to 1996, Mr. Kraemer was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Brooklyn Bancorp, a publicly-traded holding company for Crossland Federal Savings Bank.

Based on Mr. Kraemer’s experience in the accounting, banking, and financial services industries, and his leadership positions as a senior executive and director in multiple public companies, our Board has determined that Mr. Kraemer is qualified to serve as a director. In addition, our Board has determined that Mr. Kraemer’s experience with accounting principles, financial reporting and evaluation of financial results qualifies him as an “audit committee financial expert” for purposes of membership on the Audit Committee.

ALLISON M. LEOPOLD TILLEY, age 53, is a member of our Board of Directors, a position she has held since February 2016. Ms. Leopold Tilley is a Managing Board Member and Partner at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman in the Corporate & Securities – Technology practice. Throughout her 28 years with the firm, she has held several leadership positions including membership on the Managing Board, Chair of the firm’s Compensation Committee and as Practice Section Leader for the Corporate & Securities – Technology practice where she oversaw the section’s $60 million P&L and provided strategic guidance and vision for the C&S-T practice. She is a member of the Board of Directors of Outsmart Brain Cancer and a member of the Leadership Committee of Aim High and formerly on the Board of Directors of the Ronald McDonald House at Stanford, Watermark and the Global Women’s Leadership Network and a member of the Advisory Board of Women in Law Empowerment Forum. Ms. Leopold Tilley holds a Juris Doctor from the University of California, Berkeley and her B.A. from the University of California, Davis, with honors.

Based on Ms. Leopold Tilley’s leadership position as Managing Board Member and Partner at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman and her professional and financial services industry experience, in particular with companies conducting M&A and capital market transactions, and her corporate governance experience, our Board has determined that Ms. Leopold Tilley is qualified to serve as a director.

MARK R. PATTERSON, age 50, is a member of our Board of Directors, a position he has held since October 2015. Mr. Patterson served as Managing Director and Equity Analyst of NWQ Investment Management Co., LLC, from 1997 until his retirement in 2014. He conducted fundamental research and valuation analysis for NWQ’s financial services sector investments. Prior

 

- 2 -


Table of Contents

to joining NWQ, Mr. Patterson was at U.S. Bancorp from 1989 to 1997, including serving as Vice President, Investor Relations, where he was a primary contact between the bank holding company and the investment community. In that role he also performed detailed valuation and capital planning financial analysis that informed the company’s strategic direction. Prior to that position, Mr. Patterson served as a Financial Analyst in the bank’s Financial Consulting Division/ Planning & Forecasting Department. He is a Chartered Financial Analyst and holds an M.B.A. from The Anderson School at UCLA and a B.S. in Business & Mathematics from Linfield College. Mr. Patterson currently serves on the Board of Trustees of Linfield College, where he is a member of the Financial Affairs and Executive Committees and Chair of the Investment Committee.

Based on Mr. Patterson’s extensive experience as a financial services investor, his leadership positions as Managing Director and Equity Analyst of NWQ Investment Management Co., LLC and Vice President, Investor Relations at U.S. Bancorp, our Board has determined that Mr. Patterson is qualified to serve as a director. In addition, our Board has determined that Mr. Patterson’s experience with accounting principles, financial reporting and evaluation of financial results qualifies him as an “audit committee financial expert” for purposes of membership on the Audit Committee.

ARTHUR J. REIMERS, age 62, is a member of our Board of Directors, a position he has held since January 2007. Since July 2008, Mr. Reimers has been our Board’s independent Lead Director. From 2001 to present, Mr. Reimers has acted as an independent investor and business consultant, impact investor and venture philanthropist. Mr. Reimers joined Goldman, Sachs & Co. as an investment banker in 1981 and in 1990 became a partner of the firm. Upon Goldman, Sachs & Co.’s initial public offering in 1998 he became a Managing Director and served in that capacity until his retirement in 2001. From 1991 through 1996 Mr. Reimers served as co-head of Goldman, Sachs & Co.’s Investment Banking Advisory Business in Europe. From 1996 through 1999, Mr. Reimers served as co-head of Goldman, Sachs & Co.’s Healthcare Group, Investment Banking Division. Mr. Reimers served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Rotech Healthcare, Inc., a publicly-traded healthcare company, a position he held from March 2002 until September 2013. From September 2011 to June 2014, Mr. Reimers served as a member of the Board of Directors of Cumulus Media, Inc., a publicly-traded media company. In addition to these public companies, Mr. Reimers is an investor and Board Member of a number of private companies. Mr. Reimers serves on the board of The Connecticut Coalition for Achievement Now, an education reform advocacy organization. Mr. Reimers is currently an assistant adjunct professor at Miami University where he sat on the Investment Committee of the Miami University Foundation from 2001 through 2015. Mr. Reimers has a Bachelor of Science from Miami University and a Masters of Business Administration with High Distinction from the Harvard Business School. Currently, Mr. Reimers is a Venture Partner at The Draper, Richards, Kaplan Foundation, a venture philanthropy firm.

Based on Mr. Reimers extensive experience in the financial services industry, as a director of multiple publicly traded companies, his leadership position as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Rotech Healthcare, Inc., and as a Partner and Managing Director of Goldman Sachs & Co., our Board has determined that Mr. Reimers is qualified to serve as a director. In addition, our Board has determined that Mr. Reimers’ experience with accounting principles, financial reporting and evaluation of financial results qualifies him as an “audit committee financial expert” for purposes of membership on the Audit Committee.

WILLIAM F. STROME, age 62, is a member of our Board of Directors, a position he has held since October 2014. Mr. Strome currently serves as a director of the Merle E. Gilliand & Olive Lee Gilliand Foundation, a position he has held since February of 2014 and is an adjunct professor at the Graduate School of Business at Duquesne University. Since May 2015, Mr. Strome has served as a director of The ExOne Company, a publicly traded manufacturing technology company. Mr. Strome previously served as Senior Vice President, Finance & Administration, of RTI International Metals, Inc. (“RTI”), from November 2007 until his retirement in April 2014. He led RTI’s strategic planning activities, acquisition and divestiture initiatives, and capital procurement as well as investor relations and treasury functions. He was also responsible for RTI’s information technology and insurance functions. Both The ExOne Company and RTI have been, and may continue to be, investment banking clients of our company. In 2006 and 2007, prior to joining RTI, Mr. Strome was a principal at Laurel Mountain Partners where he focused on raising acquisition financing for its principal portfolio company – Liberty Waste Services. From 2001 to 2006 Mr. Strome was a Senior Managing Director in FBR’s Investment Banking group. From 1981 to 1997 he served as Deputy General Counsel and Corporate Secretary at PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and from 1997 to 2001 he served as a Managing Director of PNC’s Capital Markets broker-dealer, focusing on mergers and acquisitions as well as strategic advisory services. Mr. Strome holds an undergraduate degree in Economics from Northwestern University and a J.D. and M.B.A. from the University of Pittsburgh.

Based on Mr. Strome’s experience as a senior executive officer of a publicly traded industrial company, his experience as a Senior Managing Director and Group Head in the investment banking industry, and his corporate governance experience as Deputy General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of a publicly-traded banking corporation, our Board has determined that Mr. Strome is qualified to serve as a director. In addition, our Board has determined that Mr. Strome’s experience with accounting principles, financial reporting and evaluation of financial results qualifies him as an “audit committee financial expert” for purposes of membership on the Audit Committee.

 

- 3 -


Table of Contents

Executive Officers of the Company

Set forth below are the name, age, present title, principal occupation and certain biographical information as of the date hereof for our executive officers. All of our executive officers have been appointed by and serve at the pleasure of our Board of Directors.

RICHARD J. HENDRIX, age 51, is our President, a position he has held since our formation in June 2006, and Chief Executive Officer, a position he has held since January 1, 2009. He has served as a director of our company since June 2006 and the Chairman of our Board of Directors since the first meeting of the Board following our 2012 annual meeting of shareholders. From February 2007 through February 2008, Mr. Hendrix served as a Member of the Office of the Chief Executive of Arlington Asset, our previous parent company. From April 2004 to February 2007, Mr. Hendrix served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Arlington Asset. Between April 2003 and April 2004, Mr. Hendrix served as Chief Investment Officer of Arlington Asset. Prior to March 2003, Mr. Hendrix served as the President and Chief Operating Officer of FBR Asset Investment Corporation in addition to heading the Real Estate and Diversified Industrials Investment Banking Groups at FBR. Prior to joining FBR in 1999, Mr. Hendrix was a Managing Director of PNC Capital Markets’ investment banking group. Mr. Hendrix previously also headed PNC Capital Markets asset-backed securities business. Mr. Hendrix joined PNC in 1987 and was appointed by PNC to work with FBR in 1997 in connection with a strategic alliance between the two companies. Mr. Hendrix is a member of the Board of Trustees of Flint Hill School. Mr. Hendrix has a Bachelor of Science in finance from Miami University.

BRADLEY J. WRIGHT, age 57, is our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, a position he has held since March 2008, shortly after joining our company in February 2008, and Chief Administrative Officer, a position he has held since March 2009. Mr. Wright has more than 30 years of experience in financial services and joined our company from The Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. (“Bear Stearns”) where he served as Senior Managing Director and was in charge of finance for Private Client Services. Prior to joining Bear Stearns in 1996, he spent 14 years at PwC in its Capital Markets & Treasury division. Mr. Wright is a Certified Public Accountant and a CFA charter holder.

GAVIN A. BESKE, age 50, is our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Mr. Beske has been our Senior Vice President and General Counsel since July 2012 and has been our Corporate Secretary since June 2015. Mr. Beske was an attorney at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP before joining FBR in 2004. Mr. Beske received his undergraduate degree in Economics from Princeton University and his law degree from Columbia University, where he graduated with distinction as a Harlan Fiske Stone scholar and was Managing Editor of the Columbia Law Review.

ADAM J. FISHMAN, age 37, is our Executive Vice President and Head of Institutional Brokerage. Mr. Fishman joined FBR in 2004 and has taken on positions of increasing responsibility. As Head of Institutional Brokerage, Mr. Fishman manages all three elements of the primary and trading businesses—Research, Sales and Trading. Beginning in 2006, Mr. Fishman led the equity sales group in New York and by 2007 was responsible for the domestic Sales team. Mr. Fishman assumed responsibilities for the Research and Trading organizations in 2010 and 2016, respectively. Mr. Fishman began his career as an Associate Director in the New York office of CIBC World Markets. Mr. Fishman graduated cum laude from Brandeis University with a Bachelor of Arts in sociology.

ROBERT J. KIERNAN, age 51, is our Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer, a position he has held since October 2007. Mr. Kiernan joined Arlington Asset in August 2002 as Controller and was its Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer from April 2003 through September 2008. Prior to joining Arlington Asset, Mr. Kiernan was a senior manager in the assurance practice at Ernst & Young, focusing on clients in the financial services industry.

JAMES C. NEUHAUSER, age 58, was our Executive Vice President, a position he held from February 2012 to October 2016. Previously, he was Head of Investment Banking, a position he held since April 2008. Mr. Neuhauser joined FBR in March 1993 and became Executive Vice President and Co-Head of Investment Banking in February 2007. Prior to joining FBR, Mr. Neuhauser was a Senior Vice President of Trident Financial Corporation. Prior to joining Trident Financial Corporation, Mr. Neuhauser worked in commercial banking with the Bank of New England. He is a CFA charter holder and a member of the Society of Financial Analysts. Mr. Neuhauser received a Bachelor of Arts from Brown University and an M.B.A. from the University of Michigan. Mr. Neuhauser was a member of the U.S. Army Reserve and Michigan National Guard from 1983 to 1986.

KENNETH P. SLOSSER, age 53, is our Executive Vice President and Head of Investment Banking, a position he has held since March 2012. Prior to becoming the Head of Investment Banking, he was Head of both the Financial Institutions and Insurance Investment Banking Groups, positions he held beginning January 1, 2005. Prior to joining FBR in 1996, Mr. Slosser served as an Assistant Director with the Office of Thrift Supervision from 1986 through 1996 where he had primary oversight responsibility for savings institutions and savings institution holding companies located in California, Arizona and Nevada. Mr. Slosser has a Bachelor of Science in economics and political science from Willamette University, Salem, Oregon.

 

- 4 -


Table of Contents

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

We have a separately designated standing audit committee of our Board of Directors established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The members of the Audit Committee are Mr. Kraemer, serving as Chairman of the committee, Dr. Aggarwal, Mr. Patterson, and Mr. Strome. The Audit Committee assists and represents the Board of Directors in discharging the Board’s oversight responsibilities relating to: (1) the accounting and financial reporting practices, and internal control systems, of our company and its subsidiaries; (2) the reliability and integrity of our company’s financial statements, accounting policies, and financial reporting and disclosure practices; (3) our company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including our company’s policies and procedures regarding such requirements; (4) the independent auditor’s qualifications, independence and performance; and (5) the staffing, qualifications and performance of our company’s internal audit function.

The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is and was independent according to the independence standards set forth in the NASDAQ listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Board has determined that Messrs. Kraemer, Patterson, and Strome and Dr. Aggarwal are qualified as “audit committee financial experts,” within the meaning of the SEC regulations, and possess related financial management expertise, within the meaning of the listing standards of the NASDAQ. The Audit Committee met eight (8) times in 2016. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, a current copy of which is available to shareholders on our website at www.fbr.com under “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance.”

Code of Ethics

We have not adopted a code of ethics that applies only to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, because our Board of Directors has adopted a Statement of Business Principles that is broadly written and covers these officers and their activities. Our Statement of Business Principles is available on our website at www.fbr.com under “Investor Relations.”

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires directors and executive officers to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of our company’s securities with the SEC. Our company has historically filed the Section 16 reports for our officers and most of our directors. To our knowledge, based solely on our review of the reports and amendments to those reports furnished to us, filed by us or written representations from these persons that these reports were not required from those persons, we believe that our directors and executive officers filed all reports required by Section 16(a) for the year ended December 31, 2016, on a timely basis, except that the filing of a Form 5 report relating to 65 shares acquired by Mr. Strome on November 23, 2015 pursuant to a brokerage dividend reinvestment plan by Mr. Strome was filed on June 21, 2016.

Director Candidate Recommendations and Nominations by Shareholders

A shareholder may nominate a person for election to the Board of Directors in compliance with applicable Virginia law and our Amended and Restated Bylaws. Our Amended and Restated Bylaws require that any such nominations for our 2018 annual meeting of shareholders must be received by us not later than the close of business on the ninetieth (90th) day nor earlier than the close of business on the one hundred twentieth (120th) day prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual meeting is more than thirty (30) days before or more than sixty (60) days after such anniversary date, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than the close of business on the one hundred twentieth (120th) day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the ninetieth (90th) day prior to such annual meeting or the tenth (10th) day following the date on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. Any such notice must satisfy the other requirements with respect to such proposals and nominations contained in our Amended and Restated Bylaws. If a shareholder fails to meet the requirements or deadlines described in our policy, such nominations will be considered out of order and will not be acted upon at our 2018 annual meeting of shareholders.

 

- 5 -


Table of Contents
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The following compensation discussion and analysis provides information regarding certain aspects of our overall compensation philosophy and objectives and the elements of compensation paid to our named executive officers in 2016.

Executive Summary

2016 Performance Highlights

Despite a difficult environment over the course of 2016, we completed important transactions across all of our industry groups with energy in particular being a meaningful contributor throughout the year. Additionally, we further lowered our non-compensation fixed costs and maintained our commitment to returning capital to shareholders.

 

Selected Consolidated Financial Metrics

 

Metric

   2016      2015      % Change  

Closing Stock Price (as of last day of trading period)

   $ 13.00      $ 19.90        (35 )% 

Net Loss

     (66.0) million        (7.5) million        (780 )% 

Investment Banking Revenue

     50.5 million        71.1 million        (29 )% 

Institutional Brokerage Revenue

     47.7 million        53.5 million        (11 )% 

Non-Compensation Fixed Expenses

     38.4 million        41.9 million        (8 )% 

Tangible Book Value per Share

     15.51        27.83        (44 )% 

It has been well documented that the 2016 initial public offering (“IPO”) market was historic in its lack of activity. In fact over the course of 2015 and 2016 the small cap IPO market contracted by 52%. Inevitably, that created a challenging environment for a small-cap focused book running equities business like ours. For the full year, investment banking revenue totaled $50.5 million, compared to $71.1 million in 2015. Full year revenues were generated by 63 client engagements representing a total of $5.9 billion in transaction volume, compared to 51 client engagements representing $9.3 billion in transaction volume in 2015. The decline in year-over-year revenue primarily reflects the completion of fewer sole-managed private transactions – one in 2016, compared to four in 2015, related to the contraction in the small cap IPO market as activity declined by over 35% from 2015 levels. On the brokerage and securities lending side, full year revenues were $47.7 million in 2016, down from $53.5 million in 2015. Cash equity volumes continue to be under pressure industry-wide, with continuing net outflows from active, domestic equity managers.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, the net after-tax loss was $66.0 million, compared to a net after-tax loss of $7.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in year-over-year net loss was primarily driven by a $38.3 million tax provision recorded in 2016 related to the third quarter establishment of a full valuation reserve against our deferred tax assets. This reserve was determined to be necessary based on recent results and the relative difficulty in predicting future profits for our industry in general, and FBR specifically. The recognition of this non-cash charge does not impact our ability to realize the economic benefit of its deferred tax assets and net operating loss carry forwards on future tax returns.

Throughout 2016, we continued our effort to rationalize expenses and non-compensation fixed expenses declined by 8% year-over-year to $38.4 million, excluding a $1.3 million goodwill impairment charge, compared to $41.9 million in 2015. Part of the reduction in these expenses for the year was related to reductions in headcount, and we have additionally taken out costs in areas such as occupancy and technology.

Over the course of 2016, we returned $19.3 million to shareholders through open market repurchases valued at $13.1 million and through the payment of quarterly cash dividends. Additionally, we acquired shares outside of the share repurchase program as a result of netting of shares for tax withholding purposes in connection with employee share vesting for $9.3 million. As of December 31, 2016, shareholders’ equity totaled $117 million, with $75 million held in cash. Tangible book value per share as of December 31, 2016 was $15.51, compared to $27.83 as of December 31, 2015. The decline in tangible book value per share resulted from the combination of the operating loss for the year and the recording of a full valuation allowance against the Company’s deferred tax assets in 2016.

 

- 6 -


Table of Contents

2016 Compensation Philosophy

We link rewards to both corporate and individual performance, emphasizing long-term results and alignment with our shareholders’ interests. We align compensation with business strategy and risk and provide a mix of performance and retentive-based compensation. Long-term equity compensation is an integral part of our compensation program with awards of equity subject to vesting requirements, including continued employment, and, with respect to certain awards, performance conditions. Upon a change in control, we have double trigger provisions for accelerated vesting of equity awards. In addition, we have equity ownership guidelines for our executive officers and other key leaders of our company to ensure that our executives maintain a meaningful ownership interest in our company, aligning their interests with those of our shareholders. The equity ownership target under these guidelines for our named executive officers is equal to three times the executives’ trailing three-year average total performance compensation. Furthermore, our executive performance and annual compensation programs are generally designed with the intent to provide maximum deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code.

We do not have guaranteed severance benefits, with the exception of benefits payable to our Chief Executive Officer under his employment agreement under certain circumstances. We also do not provide excise tax gross-ups. Our executives are eligible for the same benefit plans available to all of our employees and we do not provide any executive perquisites, defined benefit plans, or other retirement benefits (other than the defined contribution plan available to employees generally).

 

What We Do

  

What We Don’t Do

•    Performance-based annual incentives tied directly to our revenue

  

•    Multi-year guaranteed incentive awards for senior executives

•    Meaningful annual restricted compensation granted in lieu of—not in addition to—annual cash incentives

  

•    Employment agreements with named executive officers, other than the Chief Executive Officer

•    Long-term equity compensation

  

•    Excise tax gross-ups

•    Performance-based equity vesting

  

•    Repricing of underwater stock options

•    Double trigger equity vesting provisions in connection with a change in control (other than in the limited circumstance where awards are not assumed or substituted for by the successor company)

  

•    Single-trigger vesting of equity- based awards upon change in control

•    Equity ownership guidelines

  

•    Executive perquisites (aircraft, club membership, professional services and the like)

•    Monitor the risks associated with our executive compensation program

  

•    Executive benefit plans

•    A clawback policy to recover incentive compensation in certain circumstances

  

•    Executive eligibility for broad-base benefits plans only

  

Throughout this report, we refer to our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, and each of our three other most highly compensated executive officers for 2016 as our “named executive officers.” In addition to our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, this group includes our head of investment banking, our head of institutional brokerage, an executive vice president who retired from our company on October 31, 2016, and our general counsel.

Principles and Objectives of Our Compensation Program

The Compensation Committee of our Board has discretionary authority over the compensation of our named executive officers. In developing a compensation program for our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee’s goal is to link compensation decisions to both corporate and individual performance, with a focus on rewarding the achievement of financial results, as well as rewarding the individual performance and accomplishments of our named executive officers in light of their respective duties and responsibilities, the impact of their actions on our strategic initiatives, and their overall contribution to the culture, strategic direction, stability and performance of our company. Our Chief Executive Officer recommends to the Compensation Committee the amount and form of compensation for each of our named executive officers other than himself, and the amount and form of compensation for our Chief Executive Officer is initially developed by the Chairman of the Compensation Committee with input from the committee’s independent compensation consultant as necessary, and is then reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee. Once finalized, the compensation decisions are reviewed and approved by the independent members of the Board as part of their deliberations. Our Compensation Committee retains the discretion to compensate and reward our named executive officers based on a variety of other factors, including subjective or qualitative factors.

 

- 7 -


Table of Contents

Principles

Our compensation program for our named executive officers is designed to attract, retain and motivate executives and professionals of the highest quality and effectiveness while aligning their interests with the long term interests of our shareholders. The following five “Principles of Compensation” summarize key categories that our Board, the Compensation Committee, and our management team believe are critical to recognize:

 

    Firm Performance — All compensation decisions are made within the context of overall firm performance. We evaluate firm performance primarily from a financial perspective, but also from a strategic perspective.

 

    Alignment — We believe that the interests of our employees and shareholders should be aligned. Compensation directly reflects both the annual and longer-term performance of the business. The higher the relative compensation level of the employee, the higher the proportion of their compensation that is paid in longer-term equity versus cash and is at risk, and therefore the greater the employee’s alignment with the strategic success of our company.

 

    Risk Management — Compensation practices and decisions are designed to neither encourage nor reward excessive or inappropriate risk taking.

 

    Employee Contribution — An individual’s compensation, evaluated within the context of overall company results, is determined by the individual’s contribution to the business. We consider both financial and non-financial factors. In determining individual compensation, teamwork and unselfish behavior — “FBR first” — are recognized and appropriately rewarded. The greater the individual’s ability to directly impact firm performance, the higher the variability in the individual’s compensation.

 

    Quality and Retention of Staff — Total compensation levels are calibrated to the market such that we remain competitive for attracting, motivating and retaining the very best people in light of our business strategy. We seek to maximize the value of an employee’s compensation through both appropriate pay design and effective communication of pay programs. Compensation is structured to encourage long-term service and loyalty.

Objectives

The Compensation Committee seeks, through our compensation programs, to foster an entrepreneurial, results-focused culture that we believe is critical to the success of our company and to the long-term growth of shareholder value. In addition to appropriately rewarding individual performance, viewed in light of each named executive officer’s duties, responsibilities and function, the Compensation Committee also believes that it is critical to encourage commitment among the named executive officers to our overall corporate objectives and culture of partnership. A key objective of our overall compensation program is for the named executive officers to have a significant portion of their compensation linked to building long-term value for our shareholders.

Role of Independent Compensation Consultant

Under its sole authority, the Compensation Committee retained Frederic W. Cook & Co. (“FW Cook”), an independent consulting firm to advise on executive compensation matters. FW Cook reported directly to the Compensation Committee. In 2016, a representative of FW Cook attended the February meeting of the Compensation Committee and met with the Compensation Committee without members of management present.

2016 Peer Group

For 2016, the Compensation Committee reviewed the annual salaries and overall compensation of our named executive officers. The Committee considered the advice and counsel of its independent financial consultant, FW Cook, along with publicly available information and disclosure regarding competitive compensation practices, pay and Chief Executive Officer equity levels from the following “peer” companies: Cowen Group, Inc., Evercore Partners Inc., JMP Group Inc., Oppenheimer Holdings Inc., Piper Jaffray Companies and Stifel Financial Corp. Our peer group includes companies primarily consisting of investment banks with revenues and market capitalizations most comparable to ours. We also occasionally look at a broader group of financial firms when reviewing general financial services pay trends. This broader group is comprised of the companies listed above and the following companies: Bank of America, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley and UBS. While the Compensation Committee considers the level of compensation paid by the firms in our company’s comparator group as a reference point that provides a framework for its compensation decisions, in order to maintain competiveness and flexibility, the Compensation Committee does not target compensation at a particular level relative to the comparator group; nor does the Compensation Committee employ a formal benchmarking strategy or rely upon specific peer–derived targets. This peer group market data is an important factor considered by the Compensation Committee when setting compensation, but it is only one of multiple factors considered by the Compensation Committee, and the amount paid to each named executive officer may be more or less than the composite market median based on individual performance, the roles and responsibilities of the executive, experience level of the individual, internal equity and other factors that the Compensation Committee deems important.

 

- 8 -


Table of Contents

Consideration of Say-on-Pay

At our 2011 annual meeting of shareholders, the shareholders voted on an advisory and non-binding basis, to put our executive compensation to an advisory vote annually. In light of this recommendation from our shareholders, as well as other factors, our Board of Directors has determined that we will hold an annual shareholder advisory vote with respect to the compensation of our named executive officers.

At our 2016 annual meeting of shareholders, we provided our shareholders with an opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers. A substantial majority of our voting shareholders (89%) voted for our say-on-pay proposal. The Compensation Committee reviewed the results of the 2016 say-on-pay vote when considering our compensation practices for 2017. The Compensation Committee believes that, while it is difficult for individual shareholders to be fully aware of all factors impacting compensation decisions, the results of the 2016 say-on-pay vote demonstrate our shareholders’ support of our compensation policies.

Elements of 2016 Compensation

This section describes the various elements of our compensation program for our named executive officers in 2016, summarized in the table below, and why the Compensation Committee chose to include the items in the compensation program. As detailed below, the primary elements of our compensation program during 2016 consisted of base salary, performance-based incentive compensation bonus, or “at risk,” compensation opportunities, and long-term equity incentive compensation. We also provided benefit programs that apply to all employees. We do not provide perquisites, special retirement benefits, or severance compensation to our named executive officers, except for severance benefits payable to Richard J. Hendrix under his employment agreement under certain circumstances. The elements of our executive compensation program are summarized as follows:

 

Element

  

Description

  

Function

Base Salary    Fixed cash compensation    Provides basic compensation at a level consistent with competitive practices; reflects role, responsibilities, skills, experience and performance; encourages retention
Performance-Based Annual Incentive Compensation    Annual incentive compensation earned based on performance under the terms of the Incentive Compensation Plan (“ICP”) payable in cash or stock, or a combination of both, in the discretion of the Compensation Committee    Motivates and rewards for achievement of annual company financial performance goal
Long-Term Equity Incentives    Equity awards granted at the Compensation Committee’s discretion under the 2006 LTIP and the 2016 Retention and Incentive Plan    Motivates and rewards for financial performance over a sustained period; strengthens mutuality of interests between executives and shareholders; increases retention; rewards creation of shareholder value
Benefits    Defined contribution savings plan, healthcare plan and other standard company benefit plans. Named executive officers receive same coverage as other employees.    Provides market competitive savings and health and welfare benefit programs available to other employees based on standard eligibility criteria

 

- 9 -


Table of Contents

Element

  

Description

  

Function

Executive Perquisites and Other Arrangements    We do not provide perquisites, defined benefit plans (other than the defined contribution plan available to employees generally) or other retirement benefits, deferred compensation, guaranteed severance or agreed-upon post-termination compensation to our named executive officers, except with respect to our Chief Executive Officer as noted above.    Not applicable, except as noted above

Base Salary

The purpose of base salary is to provide a set amount of cash compensation for each named executive officer that is not variable in nature and is generally competitive with market practices. Consistent with our performance-based compensation philosophy, the base salary for each named executive officer is targeted to account for less than half of total compensation.

The Compensation Committee seeks to pay our named executive officers a competitive base salary in recognition of their job responsibilities for a publicly-held company by considering several factors, including competitive factors within our industry, past contributions and individual performance of each named executive officer, as well as retention. In setting base salaries, the Compensation Committee is mindful of total compensation and the overall goal of keeping the amount of cash compensation that is provided in the form of base salary substantially lower than the amount of bonus opportunity that is available, assuming that performance targets are met or exceeded. Following the review of our financial performance for 2015, relevant competitive and peer market data, counsel provided by our independent compensation consultant, and our desired mix of fixed to variable compensation, the Compensation Committee determined that base salaries should remain unchanged in 2016 from 2015 levels, with the exceptions of Mr. Wright’s base salary, which was increased from $375,000 to $400,000 on January 1, 2016 and Mr. Fishman’s base salary, which was increased from $400,000 to $500,000 on January 1, 2016. Mr. Wright’s salary adjustment was made to reflect the expansion of his role to include management of our securities lending business and Mr. Fishman’s salary adjustment was made to reflect the expansion of his role to Executive Vice President, Head of Institutional Brokerage, and to achieve a more market-competitive mix of fixed to variable compensation.

Performance-Based Annual Incentive Compensation

For 2016, the Compensation Committee, taking into account the advice of FW Cook, approved the ICP for our named executive officers. Under the ICP, each named executive officer would have been eligible to share in the ICP pool in the event that the requisite performance goal had been met. The Compensation Committee intended for this annual incentive bonus opportunity to be a substantial component of each ICP participant’s total compensation. Because the annual incentive bonus opportunity and individual bonus from the ICP pool depends upon our company’s and each individual executive’s performance, the Compensation Committee believes this form of compensation is appropriately aligned with performance.

Performance based awards under the 2016 ICP were subject to the achievement of an annual performance goal of our company of a net revenue level of at least $120 million in 2016. As 2016 net revenue did not exceed the threshold level of performance for ICP funding for 2016, the ICP pool was not funded, and performance-based annual incentive compensation under the ICP was not paid to our named executive officers.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation

The Compensation Committee believes that a significant portion of our named executive officer compensation should be in the form of equity awards as a retention tool, and to align further the long-term interests of our named executive officers with those of our other shareholders. As described above, the Compensation Committee has discretion to determine the payment of named executive officer annual bonuses in either cash or stock, or a combination of cash and stock. In addition, the Compensation Committee makes annual grants of long-term, performance-based incentive compensation awards to the named executive officers.

The Compensation Committee understands that equity incentive compensation can promote high-risk behavior if the incentives it creates for short-term performance are not properly aligned with the interests of our company over the long-term. The Compensation Committee believes that the structure of our company’s long-term equity incentive compensation appropriately mitigates the risk by directly aligning the recipients’ interests with those of our company. We use judgment and discretion rather than relying solely on formulaic results, and do not use highly leveraged incentives that drive risky short-term behavior. Instead, we reward consistent and longer-term performance. Our long-term equity incentive compensation rewards long-term performance on a per share basis.

 

- 10 -


Table of Contents

2016 Retention and Incentive Program

On February 10, 2016, as disclosed in a Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 12, 2016 and in our 2016 proxy statement, we granted awards under a retention and incentive arrangement approved by the Board of Directors that is designed to further the long-term growth of our company by providing long-term incentives in respect of our company’s common stock and other equity interests and assets related to the business of our company and to assist our company in retaining key employees of experience and ability (the “Retention Program”). Richard J. Hendrix, the President and Chief Executive Officer of our company, Bradley J. Wright, the Chief Financial Officer of our company, and the other named executive officers are participants in the Retention Program.

An award under the Retention Program represents an interest in the award pool established under the Retention Program (the “Award Pool”). The Award Pool consists of a fixed number of shares of Company restricted common stock units (“RSU Pool”) drawn from the shares available under our company’s 2006 LTIP and a specified pool of securities (and the proceeds of those securities and any replacement securities) (“Asset Pool”), which will be issued, held or paid by our company for the benefit of the participants in the Retention Program. Each participant in the Retention Program has been allocated an interest in the aggregate Award Pool. Because the number of Participants is fixed at the outset of the Retention Program, and the aggregate Award Pool is likewise fixed, any forfeiture of awards by participants who cease to be employed by our company will result in the remaining Participants being entitled to a proportionately larger share of the Award Pool assuming that they remain employed through the vesting date or as otherwise specified in the Retention Program. The aggregate number of RSUs subject to the Retention Program is 167,426, and the fair market value of the Asset Pool as of February 10, 2016 was approximately $2,765,938.

Under the Retention Program, and subject to accelerated vesting in certain limited circumstances, awards will vest if the employee participant remains employed by our company as of the fourth anniversary following the date of the award. In general, our company will (1) satisfy the obligations in respect of an Asset Pool award by paying cash and/or delivering assets from the Asset Pool with an aggregate “fair market value” (as defined in the Retention Program) equal to the portion of the Asset Pool in respect of each Asset Pool award, and (2) issue shares of Company common stock (or, in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, a cash payment based on the per share “fair market value” (as defined in the 2006 LTIP)) in settlement of the vested RSU Pool awards. The foregoing description of the Retention Program is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Retention Program and to the related award letter and restricted stock unit agreement filed as Exhibits to the form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 12, 2016, and to the 2006 LTIP, which has been previously filed by our company.

Under the Retention Program, awards to the named executive officers were as follows: (1) Richard J. Hendrix, our company’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, received an award valued at approximately $250,000, including an RSU grant from the RSU Pool valued at approximately $125,000 and an award of the Asset Pool valued at approximately $125,000; (2) Bradley J. Wright, our company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, received an award valued at approximately $250,000, including an RSU grant from the RSU Pool valued at approximately $125,000 and an award of the Asset Pool valued at approximately $125,000; (3) Adam J. Fishman, our company’s Executive Vice President and Head of Institutional Brokerage, received an award valued at approximately $250,000, including an RSU grant from the RSU Pool valued at approximately $125,000 and an award of the Asset Pool valued at approximately $125,000; (4) Kenneth P. Slosser, our company’s Executive Vice President and Head of Investment Banking, received an award valued at approximately $250,000, including an RSU grant from the RSU Pool valued at approximately $125,000 and an award of the Asset Pool valued at approximately $125,000; (5) Gavin A. Beske, our company’s Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary (who was not a named executive officer at the time of this award), received an award valued at approximately $100,000, including an RSU grant from the RSU Pool valued at approximately $50,000 and an award of the Asset Pool valued at approximately $50,000; and (6) James C. Neuhauser, our company’s Executive Vice President until October 2016, received an award valued at approximately $100,000, including an RSU grant from the RSU Pool valued at approximately $50,000 and an award of the Asset Pool valued at approximately $50,000.

Performance Share Unit Program — Status of PSU Awards

On February 4, 2014, as disclosed in our 2015 and 2016 proxy statements, we granted PSUs to our company’s executive committee, including our named executive officers, under the Performance Share Unit Program. These PSU awards are earned based on the growth of our company’s tangible book value, measured on a per share basis, over a 36-month performance period beginning on January 1, 2014 and ending on December 31, 2016. In order for these PSUs to vest at the target 50% level, the compound annual growth rate of our tangible book value, measured on a per share basis and adjusted for dividends, cannot be less than 6%, equating to a tangible book value, adjusted for dividends, of $31.99 per share, and to vest at the “outperform” 100% level, the compound annual growth rate of our tangible book value, measured on a per share basis and adjusted for dividends, must be equal to or greater than 9%, equating to a tangible book value, adjusted for dividends, of $34.78 per share, by the end of the performance period. As of

 

- 11 -


Table of Contents

December 31, 2016, the tangible book value of our company, measured on a per share basis and adjusted for dividends, fell below the 6% threshold for vesting at the 50% target level, and therefore, were tracking for 0% vesting as of fiscal year-end 2016. Following the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, these PSUs were fully forfeited upon certification by our Compensation Committee of the non-achievement of the minimum performance criteria.

2014 PSU Awards

 

LOGO

On February 10, 2015, as disclosed in our 2015 and 2016 proxy statements, we granted PSUs to our company’s executive committee, including our named executive officers, under the Performance Share Unit Program. These PSU awards are earned based on the growth of our company’s tangible book value, measured on a per share basis, over a 36-month performance period beginning on January 1, 2015 and ending on December 31, 2017. In order for these PSUs to vest at the target 50% level, the compound annual growth rate of our tangible book value, measured on a per share basis and adjusted for dividends, cannot be less than 6%, equating to a tangible book value, adjusted for dividends, of $34.10 per share, and to vest at the “outperform” 100% level, the compound annual growth rate of our tangible book value, measured on a per share basis and adjusted for dividends, must be equal to or greater than 9%, equating to a tangible book value, adjusted for dividends, of $37.08 per share, by the end of the performance period. As of December 31, 2016, the tangible book value of our company, measured on a per share basis and adjusted for dividends, fell below the 6% threshold for vesting at the 50% target level, and therefore, are tracking for 0% vesting as of fiscal year-end 2016.

2015 PSU Awards

 

LOGO

 

- 12 -


Table of Contents

In the event of a change in control, the performance period with respect to each outstanding award will end and the number of performance share units earned by the participant will be fixed based on the greater of (i) our actual performance from the beginning of the performance period to the date of the change in control and (ii) the level of achievement resulting in 50% of the performance share units being earned. Following the change in control, the earned performance share units will be subject to vesting based solely on the participant’s continued employment through the date the awards would have otherwise vested, subject to accelerated vesting on certain terminations of employment.

Timing of Equity Compensation Awards

Awards of RSUs and stock options to executive officers and other eligible persons, other than non-employee directors, are made on a regular award date each year shortly after the end of the applicable performance year. The award date is scheduled to give us sufficient time to complete all performance reviews and obtain all necessary approvals.

We occasionally make awards of RSUs, stock options or RS under our 2006 LTIP other than on the regular annual award date, usually in connection with hiring a new key employee.

Formal approval for awards is obtained prior to the grant. We do not coordinate the timing of our awards with the release of material non-public information. The exercise price for stock options awarded prior to October 22, 2013 equals the closing price of our common stock on the trading day immediately preceding the grant date. In accordance with the amended and restated 2006 LTIP, which our shareholders approved on October 22, 2013, the exercise price for stock options awarded subsequent to October 22, 2013 equals the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

In 2014, our Board of Directors updated the stock ownership guidelines that are applicable to executive officers and key employees to further align our executive management’s interests with those of our shareholders. We believe that share ownership demonstrates a commitment to, and belief in, the long term performance of our company. Our stock ownership guidelines provide that the equity interest held by our President and Chief Executive Officer and each of the other members of our management Executive Committee should equal or exceed an amount equal to three times such individual’s average performance compensation over the three years preceding any calculation date. Individuals who are subject to the guidelines are expected to achieve the guideline ownership level before selling any shares, except shares sold by such individual, or retained by our company, to satisfy tax obligations associated with the exercise, vesting, or receipt of any equity award, and/or to pay the exercise price in connection with the exercise of stock options. Because share prices can be volatile, the guidelines provide that the highest share price for the common shares over the prior 12 month period immediately preceding the calculation date will be used when calculating the equity interest that an individual should hold.

Post-Termination Compensation

With the exception of our company’s employment agreement with Richard J. Hendrix, as disclosed in “Executive Compensation — Employment Agreement With Our Chief Executive Officer,” we do not have employment contracts or post-termination compensation agreements with any of our named executive officers, and we do not have contractual provisions or other arrangements with any of the named executive officers, which provide for payments at, following, or in connection with the resignation, severance, retirement or other termination of a named executive officer. Unvested stock options, RS and RSUs held by grantees, including those held by named executive officers, may vest upon a change in control (as defined in our 2006 LTIP) only if such awards are not assumed or substituted for by the successor company or upon a qualifying termination following a change in control, or upon termination of employment due to retirement, death or disability, as provided under the terms of our 2006 LTIP, our 2016 Retention and Incentive Plan or our Performance Share Unit Program, as applicable. For quantitative information related to post-termination compensation, see “Executive Compensation — Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control.”

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

In making its compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee reviews and considers the deductibility of executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, which provides that we may not deduct compensation of more than $1,000,000 that is paid to our Chief Executive Officer, or any one of our three highest paid executive officers other than our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, unless the compensation meets the requirements of “qualified performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m). The Compensation Committee has discretion to approve compensation that does not meet these requirements when the Compensation Committee considers it appropriate in order to ensure competitive levels of total compensation for our executive officers. As discussed below under the heading “—2017 Performance-Based Annual Incentive Compensation,” the Compensation Committee approved an incentive compensation program for 2017 which provides for performance-based bonuses that are intended to meet the requirements of qualified performance-based compensation.

 

- 13 -


Table of Contents

2017 Executive Compensation for Named Executive Officers

2017 Base Salaries

The Compensation Committee reviewed annual base salaries for our named executive officers and determined that they should remain unchanged in 2017 from 2016 levels.

2017 Performance-Based Annual Incentive Compensation

For 2017, the Compensation Committee has established eligibility for performance based awards under an Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2017 ICP”) that is subject to the achievement of an annual performance goal of our company of net revenue level of at least $120 million in 2017. Upon achievement of this level, each participant is eligible to receive incentive bonus compensation in an amount equal to 3% of our 2017 revenue, subject to an aggregate limitation of 6% for the group as a whole. The Compensation Committee retains sole discretion to reduce the aggregate limitation as well as the amount allocated to each executive officer, and the 2017 ICP awards, to the extent earned, may be paid in cash or stock as determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion.

The Compensation Committee intends for this annual incentive bonus opportunity to be a substantial component of each 2017 ICP participant’s 2017 total compensation. Because the annual incentive bonus opportunity and individual bonus will depend upon our company’s and each individual executive’s performance, the Compensation Committee believes this form of compensation is appropriately aligned with performance.

Performance-based annual incentive compensation is determined by the Compensation Committee and the Board based on their assessment of performance against quantitative and qualitative factors outlined below, in addition to other considerations including retention, continuity of management, and competitive factors. For each year, the relative weighting of these quantitative and qualitative factors is determined subjectively by the Compensation Committee and the Board and there is no specific percentage weighting applied to such factors. These quantitative and qualitative factors are:

 

    Cash Profitability1

 

    Expense Management

 

    Return on Equity

 

    Risk Management

 

    Compliance with Regulatory Requirements

 

    Performance Against Strategic Plan

The Compensation Committee will calculate award amounts after the close of our 2017 fiscal year so that all relevant data are available regarding our company’s and the 2017 ICP participants’ individual performance in 2017.

A threshold level of net revenue must be achieved before any awards may be payable in any year. For 2017, the Compensation Committee timely established a threshold goal of $120 million in net revenue. If actual net revenue does not equal or exceed this threshold level of performance, no performance-based annual incentive compensation bonuses will be paid under the ICP for the year. If full year actual net revenue equals or exceeds the established threshold net revenue goal, ICP bonuses will be paid as set forth above.

2017 One Year and Two Year Retention Programs

On March 8, 2017, as disclosed in a Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 8, 2017, we granted awards under two retention and incentive arrangements (the “Retention Programs”) designed to further the long-term growth of the Company by providing incentives in respect of the Company’s common stock and to assist the Company in retaining key employees of experience and ability. Richard J. Hendrix, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Bradley J. Wright, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, Adam Fishman, Executive Vice President and Head of Institutional Brokerage, Kenneth Slosser, Executive Vice President and Head of Investment Banking, and Gavin Beske, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, are participants in the Retention Programs, along with 40 other key employees.

 

1  Cash Profitability is a non-generally accepted accounting principle (“GAAP”) measurement used by our management team to analyze and assess the results of the core capital markets operating units. In determining Cash Profitability, we exclude from GAAP income before taxes the following non-core operating items: (1) severance costs associated with reductions in headcount, (2) corporate transaction costs, which includes costs associated with business combinations and acquisitions, and (3) net investment income (losses) from our long-term investments. We also exclude the following non-cash expenses: (1) impairment of intangible assets, (2) compensation costs associated with stock-based awards, and (3) amortization of intangible assets.

 

- 14 -


Table of Contents

An award under the Retention Programs represents an interest in the Award Pools established under the Retention Programs. The Award Pools consist of a fixed number of shares of Company restricted common stock units (“RSU Pools”) drawn from the shares available under the Company’s 2006 Long-Term Incentive Program (“Stock Plan”). Each participant in the Retention Programs has been allocated an interest in the aggregate Award Pools. Because the number of Participants is fixed at the outset of the Retention Programs, and the aggregate Award Pools are likewise fixed, any forfeiture of awards by participants who cease to be employed by the Company will result in the remaining Participants being entitled to a proportionately larger share of the Award Pools assuming that they remain employed through the vesting date or as otherwise specified in the Retention Programs. The aggregate number of RSUs subject to the Retention Programs is 350,000, consisting of 175,000 RSUs under a plan that provides for a one-year vesting period (the “One Year Retention Program”) and the remaining 175,000 RSUs under a plan that provides for a two-year vesting period (the “Two Year Retention Program”).

Under the One Year Retention Program, subject to accelerated vesting in certain limited circumstances, awards will vest if the employee participant remains employed by the Company as of the first anniversary following the date of the award, and under the Two Year Retention Program, subject to accelerated vesting in certain limited circumstances, awards will vest if the employee participant remains employed by the Company as of the second anniversary following the date of the award. In general, the Company will issue shares of Company common stock (or, in the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, a cash payment based on the per share “fair market value” (as defined in the Stock Plan)) in settlement of the vested RSU Pool awards. The foregoing description of the Retention Programs is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Retention Programs and to the related award letters, and restricted stock unit agreements and the Stock Plan, which have been previously filed by the Company.

Under the Retention Programs, awards to the Named Executive Officers were as follows: (1) Richard J. Hendrix, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, received RSU grants from the RSU Pools valued at approximately $500,000, split evenly between the One Year Retention Program and the Two Year Retention Program; (2) Bradley J. Wright, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, received RSU grants from the RSU Pools valued at approximately $400,000, split evenly between the One Year Retention Program and the Two Year Retention Program; (3) Adam J. Fishman, our Executive Vice President and Head of Institutional Brokerage, received RSU grants from the RSU Pools valued at approximately $500,000, split evenly between the One Year Retention Program and the Two Year Retention Program; (4) Kenneth P. Slosser, our Executive Vice President and Head of Investment Banking, received RSU grants from the RSU Pools valued at approximately $500,000, split evenly between the One Year Retention Program and the Two Year Retention Program; and (5) Gavin A. Beske, our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, received RSU grants from the RSU Pools valued at approximately $175,000, split evenly between the One Year Retention Program and the Two Year Retention Program.

Supplemental Compensation Table

The following Supplemental Compensation Table reflects how the Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors view performance year compensation by showing in the “Stock Award Component” column equity awards that relate to such performance year, even though granted in the subsequent year. In addition, because awards under our Performance Share Unit Program vest only upon achievement of forward-looking performance goals, the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors view awards under that plan as compensation for the year in which the performance goals are achieved. Therefore, the Supplemental Compensation Table below does not currently include the grant of awards under the Performance Share Unit Program in the “Long-Term Incentive Compensation — Stock Award” column, but will include such awards for the year in which they vest. Current SEC rules, in contrast, require all equity compensation to be included in the Summary Compensation Table (appearing later in this report) in the year of the grant. For example, equity grants that were made in 2017, but that relate to 2016 performance, are included as 2016 compensation in this Supplemental Compensation Table, whereas such grants will be included as 2017 compensation in the Summary Compensation Table required by the SEC. Similarly, equity grants that were made in 2016, but that relate to 2015 performance, are not included as 2016 compensation in the Supplemental Compensation Table, whereas such grants are included as 2016 compensation in the Summary Compensation Table required by the SEC.

The Supplemental Compensation Table below includes values for contingent compensation, such as unvested and/or unpaid stock awards. The named executive officers may never realize the value of certain items included under the column headed “Total”, or the amounts realized may differ materially from the amount listed in the Supplemental Compensation Table and related footnotes. Although not required by SEC rules, we believe the Supplemental Compensation Table is a useful way to disclose how the Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors view executive compensation and should be viewed as a supplement to, and not as a replacement of, the Summary Compensation Table.

 

- 15 -


Table of Contents
                         Performance Year Awards(1)      Long-
Term Incentive
Compensation
               

Name and Principal

Position

  Year      Base Salary
(2)
     Bonus(3)      Cash
Component
     Stock Award
Component
(4)
     Stock
Awards
(4)(5)(6)
     Option
Awards
     All Other
Compensation

(7)(8)
     Total  
           ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)  

Richard J. Hendrix

    2016        778,846        —          —          —          930,880        —          10,732        1,720,458  

Chairman,

    2015        750,000        2,500        200,000        —          —          —          15,000        967,500  

President and Chief Executive Officer

    2014        750,000        —          400,000        100,000        —          —          —          1,250,000  

Bradley J. Wright

    2016        411,442        —          —          —          794,489        —          166,414        1,372,345  

Executive Vice

    2015        375,000        2,500        100,000        —          —          —          5,000        482,500  

President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Chief Administrative Officer

    2014        375,000        —          280,000        70,000        —          —          —          725,000  

Kenneth P. Slosser

    2016        519,231        —          —          —          794,489        —          258,928        1,572,648  

Executive Vice

    2015        500,000        2,500        150,000        —          —          —          —          652,500  

President and Head of Investment Banking

    2014        486,154        —          400,000        100,000        —          —          —          986,154  

Adam J. Fishman

    2016        513,846        —          —          —          794,489           323,295        1,631,630  

Executive Vice

    2015        400,000        2,500        150,000        —          —          —          —          552,500  

President and Head of Institutional Brokerage

    2014        400,000        —          400,000        100,000        —          —          —          900,000  

Gavin A. Beske(9)

                         

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

    2016        363,462        —          —          —          —          —          24,917        388,379  

James C. Neuhauser(10)

    2016        444,231        —          —          —          620,318        —          254,782        1,319,331  

Executive Vice

    2015        500,000        2,500        75,000        —          —          —          —          577,500  

President

    2014        500,000        —          280,000        70,000        —          —          —          850,000  

 

(1) Amounts represent cash and equity portions of bonus compensation attributable to the relevant performance year, including awards granted in the next calendar year that are attributable to the relevant calendar year. Because the ICP was not funded in 2015, the performance year awards for 2015 represent discretionary bonuses approved by our Compensation Committee.
(2) 2016 was a payroll leap year, resulting in an additional base salary paycheck for all employees employed for the full year relative to our standard annual payroll schedule.
(3) On January 25, 2015, a nominal award of 100 shares of Pacific Datavision stock valued at $2,500 was awarded to approximately 125 employees that qualified as Accredited Investors, including each if our named executive officers.
(4) The amounts in these columns represent the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards that vested in the relevant year computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718. The discussion of the assumptions used for purposes of the valuation of these awards appears in Note 2 of our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.
(5) On February 10, 2016, we granted Messrs. Wright, Slosser, Fishman, Beske and Neuhauser RSU awards under the 2016 Retention and Incentive Plan, scheduled to vest on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant, subject to continued employment with our company. Messrs. Hendrix, Wright, Slosser and Fishman were each awarded 7,567 RSUs. Messrs. Beske and Neuhauser were each awarded 3,027 RSUs. Each RSU awarded represents the right to receive one share of our common stock.
(6) Includes 2013 PSU grants that vested in 2016. Does not include PSUs granted to our named executive officers under the Performance Share Unit Program on February 4, 2014 and February 10, 2015, as disclosed in our 2014 and 2015 proxy statements and above under the heading “Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation” because none of such awards were vested as of December 31, 2016.

On February 4, 2014, we granted PSU awards denominated in shares of our common stock as follows: (i) Richard J. Hendrix, 55,481 shares; (ii) Bradley J. Wright, 37,450 shares; (iii) Kenneth P. Slosser, 37,450 shares; (iv) Adam J. Fishman, 37,450 shares; and (v) James C. Neuhauser, 28,665 shares. The PSUs will be earned, subject to continued employment with our company, based on the growth of our company’s tangible book value, measured on a per share basis, over a 36-month performance period that began on January 1, 2014 and ends on December 31, 2016. Actual financial performance as of fiscal

 

- 16 -


Table of Contents

year-end 2016 indicates that achievement of the applicable performance goals did not occur, and thus the PSUs scheduled to vest on December 31, 2016 were forfeited following the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 upon certification of performance criteria by the Compensation Committee.

On February 10, 2015, we granted PSU awards denominated in shares of our common stock as follows: (i) Richard J. Hendrix, 46,051 shares; (ii) Bradley J. Wright, 32,236 shares; (iii) Kenneth P. Slosser, 32,236 shares; (iv) Adam J. Fishman, 32,236 shares; and (v) James C. Neuhauser, 23,026 shares. The PSUs will be earned, subject to continued employment with our company, based on the growth of our company’s tangible book value, measured on a per share basis, over a 36-month performance period that began on January 1, 2015 and ends on December 31, 2017. Actual financial performance as of fiscal year-end 2016 indicates that achievement of the applicable performance goals is improbable and thus it is likely that the PSUs scheduled to vest on December 31, 2017 will be forfeited.

 

(7) As disclosed in the 2012 proxy statement under the heading “Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation,” our company granted awards under the 2012 Retention and Incentive Plan on February 8, 2012. As part of this program, Messrs. Wright, Fishman, Beske and Neuhauser were awarded interests in an asset pool of non-FBR securities established under the 2012 Retention and Incentive Plan. On February 8, 2016, the awards under the 2012 Retention and Incentive Plan vested and, consistent with the Plan, the vested Asset Pool awards were settled in cash, equivalent to the aggregate fair market value equal to the portion of the 2012 Asset Pool represented by such award. As such, cash payments were made on February 12, 2016 to our named executive officers as follows: $152,040 was paid to Mr. Wright, $233,903 was paid to Mr. Slosser, $292,385 was paid to Mr. Fishman, $23,291 was paid to Mr. Beske and $20,874 was paid to Mr. Neuhauser.
(8) According to the terms of the award agreements, unvested RSUs are eligible for dividend equivalent payments, consistent with publicly declared dividends payable on shares of our common stock, payable following vesting of the RSUs. On February 5, 2016, Messrs. Hendrix, Wright, Slosser, Fishman and Neuhauser vested in 26,829, 4,878, 24,390, 17,073 and 14,024 RSUs, respectively, which were initially awarded on February 5, 2013. Additionally, on February 8, 2016, Messrs. Wright, Slosser, Fishman, Beske and Neuhauser vested in 24,829, 38,198, 47,747, 3,820 and 38,198 RSUs, respectively, which were awarded under the 2012 Retention and Incentive Plan, of which the initial grant date was February 8, 2012 and quarterly proportional reallocation of forfeited interests were awarded thereafter. Following vesting of aforementioned RSUs, on February 12, 2016, dividend equivalent payments of $10,732, $11,873, $25,020, $25,910, $1,526 and $20,874 were paid to Messrs. Hendrix, Wright, Slosser, Fishman, Beske and Neuhauser, respectively, for accrued dividend equivalents related to the dividends we paid to shareholders on our common stock on August 28, 2015 and November 27, 2015.

On April 26, 2016, Messrs. Wright and Fishman vested in 4,168 and 8,334 RSUs, respectively, which were initially awarded on April 27, 2011. Following vesting, on May 20, 2016, dividend equivalent payments of $2,501 and $5,000 were paid to Messrs. Wright and Fishman, respectively, for accrued dividend equivalents related to the dividends we paid to our shareholders on our common stock on August 28, 2015, November 27, 2015, and March 4, 2016.

(9) Mr. Beske became an executive officer of our company on July 16, 2016. For Mr. Beske, compensation is not shown for fiscal years 2014 or 2015 because he was not a named executive officer in fiscal years 2014 or 2015.
(10) Mr. Neuhauser retired from our company on October 31, 2016.

 

- 17 -


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The Summary Compensation Table below contains, in compliance with the reporting requirements of the SEC, the compensation information for our named executive officers for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. In accordance with SEC rules, the following table includes for a particular calendar year only those stock and option awards during that calendar year, rather than awards granted after year end, even if awarded for services in that calendar year. Therefore, the Compensation Committee and the Board view the Supplemental Compensation Table as a better reflection of their views on compensation related to 2016, 2015 and 2014 performance. The Summary Compensation Table below includes values for contingent compensation, such as unvested and/or unpaid stock awards and unexercised stock options. The named executive officers may never realize the value of certain items included under the column headed “Total”, or the amounts realized may differ materially from the amount listed in the Summary Compensation Table and related footnotes. In addition, equity compensation is reported in several different tables in this report. For that reason, investors should take care to not “double count” equity awards.

 

Name and Principal

Position

   Year      Salary(1)      Bonus (2)      Stock
Awards (3)
     Option
Awards
     Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation (4)
     Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
     All Other
Compensation (5)(6)
     Total  
            ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)  

Richard J. Hendrix

     2016        778,846        —          136,129        —          —          —          10,732        925,707  

Chairman,

     2015        750,000        202,500        646,405        —          —          —          15,000        1,613,905  

President and Chief Executive Officer

     2014        750,000        —          1,323,009        —          400,000        —          —          2,473,009  

Bradley J. Wright

     2016        411,442        —          136,129        —          —          —          166,414        713,986  

Executive Vice

     2015        375,000        102,500        473,354        —          —          —          5,000        955,854  

President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Chief Administrative Officer

     2014        375,000        —          750,042        —          280,000        —          —          1,405,042  

Kenneth P. Slosser

     2016        519,231        —          136,129        —          —          —          258,928        914,228  

Executive Vice

     2015        500,000        152,500        514,582        —          —          —          —          1,167,082  

President and Head of 
Investment Banking

     2014        486,154        —          1,168,346        —          400,000        —          —          2,054,500  

Adam J. Fishman

     2016        513,846        —          136,129        —          —          —          323,295        973,270  

Executive Vice

     2015        400,000        152,500        522,581        —          —          —          —          1,075,081  

President and Head of Institutional Brokerage

     2014        400,000        —          1,028,567        —          400,000        —          —          1,828,567  

Gavin A. Beske(7)

                          

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

     2016        363,462        —          54,454        —          —          —          24,917        442,833  

James C. Neuhauser(8)

     2016        444,231        —          54,454        —          —          —          254,782        753,467  

Executive Vice

     2015        500,000        77,500        375,310        —          —          —          —          952,810  

President

     2014        500,000        —          723,376        —          280,000        —          —          1,503,376  

 

(1) 2016 was a payroll leap year, resulting in an additional base salary paycheck for all employees employed for the full year relative to our standard annual payroll schedule.
(2) Amounts include cash portion of non-ICP bonus compensation attributable to the relevant performance year and a nominal award of 100 shares of Pacific Datavision stock valued at $2,500 was awarded on January 25, 2015 to approximately 125 employees that qualified as Accredited Investors, including our named executive officers.

 

- 18 -


Table of Contents
(3) The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of stock-based awards made during the calendar year without regard to the period to which the award corresponds computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The discussion of the assumptions used for purposes of the valuation of the restricted shares of common stock, PSUs, RSUs and stock options granted appears in Note 2 of our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.
(4) Amounts represent cash portion of 2014 ICP compensation attributable to the relevant performance year.
(5) As disclosed in the 2012 proxy statement under the heading “Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation,” our company granted awards under the 2012 Retention and Incentive Plan on February 8, 2012. As part of this program, Messrs. Wright, Fishman, Beske and Neuhauser were awarded interest in an asset pool of non-FBR securities established under the 2012 Retention and Incentive Plan. On February 8, 2016, the awards under the 2012 Retention and Incentive Plan vested and, consistent with the Plan, the vested Asset Pool awards were settled in cash, equivalent to the aggregate fair market value equal to the portion of the 2012 Asset Pool represented by such award. As such, cash payments were made on February 12, 2016 to our named executive officers as follows: $152,040 was paid to Mr. Wright, $233,903 was paid to Mr. Slosser, $292,385 was paid to Mr. Fishman, $23,291 was paid to Mr. Beske and $20,874 was paid to Mr. Neuhauser.
(6) According to the terms of the award agreements, unvested RSUs are eligible for dividend equivalent payments, consistent with publicly declared dividends payable on shares of our common stock, payable following vesting of the RSUs. On February 5, 2016, Messrs. Hendrix, Wright, Slosser, Fishman and Neuhauser vested in 26,829, 4,878, 24,390, 17,073 and 14,024 RSUs, respectively, which were initially awarded on February 5, 2013. Additionally, on February 8, 2016, Messrs. Wright, Slosser, Fishman, Beske and Neuhauser vested in 24,829, 38,198, 47,747, 3,820 and 38,198 RSUs, respectively, which were awarded under the 2012 Retention and Incentive Plan, of which the initial grant date was February 8, 2012 and quarterly proportional reallocation of forfeited interests were awarded thereafter. Following vesting of aforementioned RSUs, on February 12, 2016, dividend equivalent payments of $10,732, $11,873, $25,020, $25,910, $1,526 and $20,874 were paid to Messrs. Hendrix, Wright, Slosser, Fishman, Beske and Neuhauser, respectively, for accrued dividend equivalents related to the dividends we paid to shareholders on our common stock on August 28, 2015 and November 27, 2015.

On April 26, 2016, Messrs. Wright and Fishman vested in 4,168 and 8,334 RSUs, respectively, which were initially awarded on April 27, 2011. Following vesting, on May 20, 2016, dividend equivalent payments of $2,501 and $5,000 were paid to Messrs. Wright and Fishman, respectively, for accrued dividend equivalents related to the dividends we paid to our shareholders on our common stock on August 28, 2015, November 27, 2015, and March 4, 2016.

(7) Mr. Beske became an executive officer of our company on July 16, 2016. For Mr. Beske, compensation is not shown for fiscal years 2014 or 2015 because he was not a named executive officer in fiscal years 2014 or 2015.
(8) Mr. Neuhauser retired from our company on October 31, 2016.

 

- 19 -


Table of Contents

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for 2016

The following table presents information concerning each grant made to our named executive officers in our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, under any equity or non-equity incentive plan. In accordance with SEC rules, the table does not include March 2017 awards.

 

     Grant
Date
   

Date of

Compensation

Committee

     Estimated
Future
Payouts
under Non-
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards
    Estimated Future
Payouts under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
    

All Other

Stock

Awards:

Number of

Shares or

Units

    

All Other

Stock

Awards:

Number of

Shares

Underlying

    

Exercise or

Base Price

of Option

    

Closing

Market

Price on

Date of

     Grant Date  

Name

     Approval      Threshold     Threshold      Maximum      of Stock      Options      Awards      Grant      Fair Value (1)  
                  ($)     (#)      (#)      (#)             ($/sh)      ($/sh)      ($)  

Richard J. Hendrix

          1,080,000 (2)      —          —          —          —          —          —       
     2/10/2016 (3)      2/9/2016        —         —          —          7,567              16.52        125,007  
     4/1/2016 (4)      2/9/2016        —         —          —          393              17.93        7,046  
     7/1/2016 (4)      2/9/2016        —         —          —          222              14.76        3,277  
     10/3/2016 (4)      2/9/2016        —         —          —          60              13.32        799  

Bradley J. Wright

          1,080,000 (2)      —          —                   
     2/10/2016 (3)      2/9/2016        —         —          —          7,567              16.52        125,007  
     4/1/2016 (4)      2/9/2016        —         —          —          393              17.93        7,046  
     7/1/2016 (4)      2/9/2016        —         —          —          222              14.76        3,277  
     10/3/2016 (4)      2/9/2016        —         —          —          60              13.32        799  

Kenneth P. Slosser

          1,080,000 (2)      —          —                   
     2/10/2016 (3)      2/9/2016        —         —          —          7,567              16.52        125,007  
     4/1/2016 (4)      2/9/2016        —         —          —          393              17.93        7,046  
     7/1/2016 (4)      2/9/2016        —         —          —          222              14.76        3,277  
     10/3/2016 (4)      2/9/2016        —         —          —          60              13.32        799  

Adam J. Fishman

          1,080,000 (2)      —          —                   
     2/10/2016 (3)      2/9/2016        —         —          —          7,567              16.52        125,007  
     4/1/2016 (4)      2/9/2016        —         —          —          393              17.93        7,046  
     7/1/2016 (4)      2/9/2016        —         —          —          222              14.76        3,277  
     10/3/2016 (4)      2/9/2016        —         —          —          60              13.32        799  

Gavin A. Beske

          —         —          —                   
     2/10/2016 (3)         —         —          —          3,027              16.52        50,006  
     4/1/2016 (4)         —         —          —          157              17.93        2,815  
     7/1/2016 (4)         —         —          —          89              14.76        1,314  
     10/3/2016 (4)      2/9/2016        —         —          —          24              13.32        320  

James C. Neuhauser

          1,080,000 (2)      —          —                   
     2/10/2016 (3)      2/9/2016        —         —          —          3,027              16.52        50,006  
     4/1/2016 (4)      2/9/2016        —         —          —          157              17.93        2,815  
     7/1/2016 (4)      2/9/2016        —         —          —          89              14.76        1,314  
     10/3/2016 (4)      2/9/2016        —         —          —          24              13.32        320  

 

(1) Represents the grant date fair value, which has been computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
(2)

As disclosed above under the heading “Elements of 2016 Compensation — Performance-Based Annual Incentive Compensation,” the Compensation Committee approved the ICP for our named executive officers, under which our named executive officers and one other executive would have been eligible to share in the ICP pool in the event the requisite performance goal had been met. Under the ICP, a net revenue level of at least $120 million would have to be achieved, upon which an ICP pool of 6% of net revenue beginning with the first dollar of revenue earned would fund, with any individual executive award not to exceed 3% of net revenue. Historically, our Compensation Committee has always exercised negative discretion and reduced the amount of the ICP pool paid out to our named executive officers from its fully funded level. As described above, the ICP did not fund for 2016. However, for purposes of this table, it is assumed that 2016 revenue totaled $120 million, resulting in a 6% ICP pool of $7,200,000, divided equally among our five named executive officers as of the date the ICP was adopted. Mr. Beske was not a named executive officer as of the date of ICP adoption. Furthermore, it is assumed for purposes of this table that each award was comprised of a 75% cash payment of $1,050,000 and 25% mandatory equity component consisting of RSUs valued at $360,000. Because ICP equity awards for 2016 would have been granted on March 8,

 

- 20 -


Table of Contents
  2017, those values are not included in the table above. However, based on the closing price of our common stock on March 8, 2017 of $17.55, the date such awards would have been granted, 20,513 RSUs would have been awarded to each of our named executive officers, excluding Mr. Beske, based on assumed ICP equity awards with grant date fair value of $360,000.
(3) On February 10, 2016, we granted Messrs. Hendrix, Wright, Slosser, Fishman, Beske and Neuhauser RSU awards under the 2016 Retention and Incentive Plan, scheduled to vest on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant, subject to continued employment with our company. Messrs. Hendrix, Wright, Slosser and Fishman were each awarded 7,567 RSUs. Messrs. Beske and Neuhauser were each awarded 3,027 RSUs. Each RSU awarded represents the right to receive one share of our common stock. As Mr. Beske was not a named executive officer on February 10, 2016, the date of grant, his award of RSUs did not require approval by our Compensation Committee.
(4) Under the 2016 Retention and Incentive Plan, the number of participants and the aggregate award pool was fixed at the outset of the plan. Therefore, any forfeiture of awards by participants who ceased to be employed by our company resulted in the remaining participants being entitled to a proportionally larger share of the award pool assuming that they remain employed through the vesting date of the plan. As such, Messrs. Hendrix, Wright, Slosser, Fishman, Beske and Neuhauser received quarterly proportional reallocation of forfeited interests. On April 1, 2016, Messrs. Hendrix, Wright, Slosser and Fishman were each allocated forfeited interests of 393 RSUs, and Messrs. Beske and Neuhauser were each allocated forfeited interests of 157 RSUs. On July 1, 2016, Messrs. Hendrix, Wright, Slosser and Fishman were each allocated forfeited interests of 222 RSUs, and Messrs. Beske and Neuhauser were each allocated forfeited interests of 89 RSUs. On October 3, 2016, Messrs. Hendrix, Wright, Slosser and Fishman were each allocated forfeited interests of 60 RSUs, and Messrs. Beske and Neuhauser were each allocated forfeited interests of 24 RSUs.

Employment Agreement With Our Chief Executive Officer

On June 16, 2015, we entered into an employment agreement with Richard J. Hendrix to serve as our Chief Executive Officer that replaces and supersedes the prior agreement with Mr. Hendrix entered into on December 12, 2012. The agreement continues until December 31, 2018, except that upon a “Change in Control” (as defined in the 2006 LTIP), the term will automatically extend so as to be at least two years from the effective date of such event. The agreement generally provides for an annual base salary of at least $750,000 during the term and eligibility to participate in any of our performance bonus plans or programs or long-term incentive plans or programs as in effect from time to time for the benefit of our executive officers.

The agreement provides for severance benefits in the event of termination of Mr. Hendrix’s employment during the agreement’s term. Upon a termination due to death or disability, Mr. Hendrix (or his estate) will be entitled to receive (i) any annual salary and other benefits actually earned and accrued under the agreement prior to the date of termination plus any annual incentive amount earned but not yet paid under any bonus plan in which Mr. Hendrix participated for our completed fiscal year prior to the date of termination; (ii) immediate vesting of all unvested incentive equity or equity-based awards held by Mr. Hendrix, including any performance-based cash or equity-based awards that are not intended to qualify as “performance based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”); provided, however, that unvested incentive equity or equity-based awards that are intended to qualify as “performance based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code shall vest and be earned only upon achievement of the applicable performance goals or objectives (but disregarding any requirement for Mr. Hendrix’s continued employment); (iii) reimbursement of expenses incurred prior to the date of termination; (iv) a pro rata actual annual incentive payment in respect of our fiscal year in which the date of termination occurs; and (v) all vested rights and benefits under any retirement or other benefit plan or program.

If Mr. Hendrix’s employment is terminated for Cause (as defined below) or he voluntarily resigns without Good Reason (as defined below), he will be entitled to receive (i) any annual salary and other benefits actually earned and accrued under the agreement prior to the date of termination, plus any annual incentive amount earned but not yet paid under any bonus plan in which Mr. Hendrix participated for our completed fiscal year of our company prior to the date of termination, (ii) reimbursement of expenses incurred prior to the date of termination, and (iii) all vested rights and benefits under any retirement or other benefit plan or program. For purposes of the agreement, “Cause” means Mr. Hendrix’s:

 

    conviction of, indictment for or formal admission to or plea of nolo contendere with respect to, a felony or a crime of moral turpitude, dishonesty, breach of trust, fraud, misappropriation, embezzlement or unethical business conduct (but only if the Board reasonably determines, after considering all related facts and circumstances, that such indictment, conviction or plea has materially and adversely affected or is reasonably likely to materially and adversely affect our business or reputation), or any crime involving our company;

 

    continued willful misconduct or willful or gross neglect in the performance of his duties under the agreement, following written notice of such misconduct or neglect and failure to remedy such misconduct or neglect within 15 days after delivery of such notice; provided, however, the Board shall have the discretion (A) to require a remedial period that is shorter than 15 days to remedy certain misconduct or neglect that the Board reasonably determines can be remedied in less than 15 days or (B) to offer no opportunity to remediate conduct or neglect that the Board reasonably determines to be incapable of being cured;

 

- 21 -


Table of Contents
    continued failure to materially adhere to our clear directions, to adhere to our written policies, or to devote substantially all of his business time and efforts to us in accordance with and subject to the provisions of Section 2 of the agreement, and failure to cure such failure within 15 days after delivery of written notice of such failure; provided, however, the Board of Directors shall have the discretion (A) to require a remedial period that is shorter than 15 days to remedy certain failures that the Board reasonably determines can be remedied in less than 15 days or (B) to offer no opportunity to remediate failures that the Board reasonably determines to be incapable of being cured;

 

    continued failure to substantially perform the duties properly assigned to Mr. Hendrix by us (other than any such failure resulting from his disability) and failure to cure such failure within 15 days after delivery of written notice of such failure; provided, however, the Board shall have the discretion (A) to require a remedial period that is shorter than 15 days to remedy certain failures that the Board reasonably determines can be remedied in less than 15 days or (B) to offer no opportunity to remediate failures that the Board reasonably determines to be incapable of being cured; or

 

    material and willful breach of any of the terms and conditions of the agreement and failure to cure such breach within 15 days following written notice from us specifying such breach; provided, however, the Board shall have the discretion (A) to require a remedial period that is shorter than 15 days to remedy certain breaches that the Board reasonably determines can be remedied in less than 15 days or (B) to offer no opportunity to remediate breaches that the Board reasonably determines to be incapable of being cured.

If Mr. Hendrix’s employment is terminated by us without Cause or he resigns for Good Reason, he will be entitled to receive: (i) any annual salary and other benefits actually earned and accrued under the agreement prior to the date of termination, plus any annual incentive amount earned but not yet paid under any bonus plan in which Mr. Hendrix participated for our completed fiscal year prior to the date of termination; (ii) reimbursement of expenses incurred prior to the date of termination; (iii) a pro rata actual annual incentive payment in respect of our fiscal year in which the date of termination occurs; (iv) all vested rights and benefits under any retirement or other benefit plan or program; (v) a cash payment equal to two (2) times the average total annual salary and incentive amount earned by and paid to Mr. Hendrix with respect to our three completed fiscal years preceding the date of termination; provided that such lump-sum amount will not be less than $3.5 million nor more than $5 million unless such termination occurs within two years following a “Change in Control” as defined in our 2006 LTIP, in which case such minimum and maximum shall not apply; (vi) immediate vesting of all unvested incentive equity or equity-based awards held by Mr. Hendrix, including any performance-based cash or equity-based awards that are not intended to qualify as “performance based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code; provided, however, that unvested incentive equity or equity-based awards that are intended to qualify as “performance based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code shall vest and be earned only upon achievement of the applicable performance goals or objectives (but disregarding any requirement for Mr. Hendrix’s continued employment); and (vii) for a period of three years after termination of employment, continuing coverage of Mr. Hendrix and his qualified beneficiaries under our group health plans that Mr. Hendrix and his beneficiaries would have received under the agreement in the absence of termination, provided that we are in no event required to provide such coverage to Mr. Hendrix or a qualified beneficiary after such time as Mr. Hendrix or the beneficiary, as applicable, is no longer eligible to receive continued coverage under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA). For the portion of such three-year period after Mr. Hendrix or a beneficiary is no longer eligible to elect continuing coverage under our group health plans under COBRA, we will reimburse the health insurance premiums incurred by Mr. Hendrix under a private health insurance plan that provides substantially similar benefits for Mr. Hendrix and his beneficiaries and is reasonably acceptable to us, provided that we are in no event required to provide or reimburse the cost of any benefits otherwise required by this clause after such time as Mr. Hendrix or the beneficiary, as applicable, becomes entitled to receive benefits of the same type from another employer.

For purposes of the agreement, “Good Reason” means:

 

    within two years following a “Change in Control” of our company as that term is defined in our 2006 LTIP, any demotion of Mr. Hendrix or any material diminution in Mr. Hendrix’s authority, duties and responsibilities, or the assignment to Mr. Hendrix of duties materially inconsistent with Mr. Hendrix’s position or positions with us; provided, however, that any merger or business combination of our company solely with any other affiliate of our company shall not be deemed to be a Change in Control for purposes of the agreement;

 

    a reduction of more than 10% in the annual salary of Mr. Hendrix (except any such reduction that is part of across-the-board salary reductions generally applicable to our executive management team);

 

    any demotion of Mr. Hendrix from his position or material diminution in the duties, authority and responsibility of Mr. Hendrix; provided, however, that in no event shall the assignment by the Board prior to a Change in Control of a portion of Mr. Hendrix’s duties to a member of our senior management team who reports directly to Mr. Hendrix constitute (or serve as a basis for Mr. Hendrix to claim) Good Reason under the agreement; or

 

- 22 -


Table of Contents
    the failure of the Board of Directors to nominate Mr. Hendrix for re-election as a member of the Board of Directors at the expiration of each then-current term.

Under certain circumstances, the severance benefits payable by us will be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid Mr. Hendrix paying any excise tax under Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code, but only if such reduction would place Mr. Hendrix in a more favorable after-tax position than paying the excise tax.

The agreement also contains restrictive covenants that generally prohibits Mr. Hendrix from (i) competing with us during the term of his employment and until the first anniversary of the date that his employment with us terminates either by us with or without Cause or by Mr. Hendrix with or without Good Reason (the “Employment Agreement Restricted Period”); (ii) soliciting our customers during the Employment Agreement Restricted Period; (iii) hiring or soliciting our employees during the Employment Agreement Restricted Period; and (iv) divulging to anyone outside of us, except as required by law or with our express written consent and except for our confidential information which is publicly known through no wrongful act on Mr. Hendrix’s part, any confidential matters relating to our and our affiliates’ affairs learned by Mr. Hendrix. Mr. Hendrix also agreed not to make any statement, orally or in writing, nor to take any action, that (A) in any way could reasonably be expected to disparage us or the business reputation of any of our directors, employees, representatives or agents, or which foreseeably or reasonably could be expected to harm the business reputation or goodwill of those persons or entities, or (B) in any way, directly or indirectly, could knowingly cause, encourage or condone the making of such statements or the taking of such actions by anyone else.

The covenant not to compete with us without our express written consent includes a prohibition on Mr. Hendrix owning an interest in, joining, operating, controlling or participating in, being connected as an owner, officer, executive, employee, partner, member, manager, shareholder, or principal of or with, or otherwise aiding or assisting in any manner whatsoever, any individual corporation or entity that competes with the activities of us or our subsidiaries in the capital markets, financial advisory and/or institutional sales and trading businesses. However, Mr. Hendrix may (i) own up to one percent (1%) of the outstanding stock of a publicly held corporation which is or is affiliated with an entity or person that competes with us or our subsidiaries; or (ii) be an officer, executive, employee, partner, member, manager, shareholder, or principal of or with a private equity fund or a third-party asset management firm. If Mr. Hendrix’s employment with us is terminated for any reason by us or Mr. Hendrix effective during the two-year period immediately following a Change in Control, the covenant not to compete with us shall be limited to (A) those middle market-focused investment banking or brokerage entities that are in direct competition with our capital markets and/or institutional sales and trading business, and (B) engaging in any activity in any capacity for any corporation or other entity, whether or not competitive with us, relating to or involving institutional equity private placement transactions (including transactions under Rule 144A).

If Mr. Hendrix breaches, or threatens to commit a breach of, any of the restrictive covenants described above, we and our affiliates, in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other rights and remedies available to us and our affiliates under law or in equity (including, without limitation, the recovery of damages), shall have the right and remedy to have the restrictive covenants specifically enforced by any court having equity jurisdiction, including, without limitation, the right to an entry against Mr. Hendrix of restraining orders and injunctions (preliminary, mandatory, temporary and permanent) against violations, threatened or actual, and whether or not then continuing, of such covenants.

The employment agreement may be amended, superseded, canceled, renewed or extended, and its terms may be waived, only by a written agreement signed by Mr. Hendrix and us.

 

- 23 -


Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards At 2016 Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth information concerning equity awards of our named executive officers that were outstanding at December 31, 2016.

 

     Option Awards      Stock Awards  

Name

   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
     Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
     Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
     Option
Exercise
Price
     Option
Expiration
Date
     Number of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
     Market
Value of
Shares
or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested (1)
     Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
     Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested (1)
 
     (#)
(Exercisable)
     (#)
(Unexercisable)
     (#)      ($)             (#)      ($)      (#)      ($)  

Richard J. Hendrix(2)

     125,000        —          —          11.80        2/24/2019        40,071        520,923        23,026        299,338  
     62,500        —          —          21.72        2/9/2020              

Bradley J. Wright(3)

     12,500        —          —          14.40        4/27/2018        21,652        281,476        16,118        209,534  

Kenneth P. Slosser(4)

     —          —          —                39,234        510,042        16,118        209,534  

Adam J. Fishman(5)

     25,000        —          —          14.40        4/27/2018        32,540        423,020        16,118        209,534  

Gavin A. Beske(6)

     —          —          —                8,749        113,737        9,211        119,743  

James C. Neuhauser(7)

     —          —          —                15,502        201,526        7,034        89,232  

 

(1) The market value of RSUs that have not vested as of December 31, 2016 was calculated based on $13.00 per share, the closing price of our company’s common stock on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of the year.
(2) On February 24, 2009, Mr. Hendrix was granted options to purchase 125,000 shares of our common stock under the 2006 LTIP. The options have an exercise price of $11.80 per share, which was equivalent to the closing price of our common stock on February 23, 2009, the day preceding the date of grant, vested in four equal annual installments on the first four anniversaries of the date of grant and will expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. Mr. Hendrix exercised 30,000 of these options on March 30, 2017, and exercised 30,000 of these options on April 20, 2017.

Based on a review of Mr. Hendrix’s increased responsibilities and contributions to our company as Chief Executive Officer, the benefits of further aligning Mr. Hendrix’s short and long-term interests with those of our company and shareholders, and a review of Mr. Hendrix’s equity ownership as Chief Executive Officer of our company, on February 9, 2010, the Board approved the award of options to purchase 62,500 shares of our company’s common stock under the 2006 LTIP. The options have an exercise price of $21.72, which was equivalent to the closing price of our company’s common stock on February 8, 2010, the day preceding the date of grant, vested in three equal annual installments on the third, fourth, and fifth anniversaries of the date of grant, and will expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant.

Unvested RSUs held by Mr. Hendrix at December 31, 2016 vest as follows: 27,615 RSUs vested in full on February 4, 2017, 4,214 RSUs will vest in full on February 10, 2018, and 8,242 RSUs will vest in full on February 10, 2020.

Unvested PSUs held by Mr. Hendrix at December 31, 2016 vest as follows: Based on financial performance through December 31, 2016, PSUs scheduled to vest on December 31, 2016 were fully forfeited upon certification of performance criteria by the Compensation Committee following the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2016 fiscal year. Although SEC rules require minimum reporting in this table of the 50% threshold level for outstanding PSUs at fiscal year-end, actual performance as of fiscal year-end indicates that achievement of the applicable performance goals is improbable. 23,026 PSUs are expected to vest on December 31, 2017 contingent on 50% achievement of performance goals related to the compound annual growth rate of our company’s tangible book value between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017, as described above under the heading “Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation — Status of PSU Awards.”

 

- 24 -


Table of Contents
(3) On April 27, 2011, Mr. Wright was awarded options to purchase 12,500 shares of our common stock under the 2006 LTIP, as a one-time grant for incentive and retention purposes, approved by the Compensation Committee to closer align Mr. Wright’s equity ownership levels to other named executive officers. The options have an exercise price of $14.40, which was equivalent to the closing price of our common stock on April 26, 2011, the day preceding the date of grant, vested in full on the third anniversary of the date of grant, and will expire on the seventh anniversary of the date of grant. Mr. Wright fully exercised these options on March 28, 2017.

Unvested RSUs held by Mr. Wright at December 31, 2016 vest as follows: 10,460 RSUs vested in full on February 4, 2017, 2,950 RSUs will vest in full on February 10, 2018, and 8,242 RSUs will vest in full on February 10, 2020.

Unvested PSUs held by Mr. Wright as of December 31, 2016 vest as follows: Based on financial performance through December 31, 2016, PSUs scheduled to vest on December 31, 2016 were fully forfeited upon certification of performance criteria by the Compensation Committee following the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2016 fiscal year. Although SEC rules require minimum reporting in this table of the 50% threshold level for outstanding PSUs at fiscal year-end, actual performance as of fiscal year-end indicates that achievement of the applicable performance goals is improbable. 16,118 PSUs are expected to vest on December 31, 2017 contingent on 50% achievement of performance goals related to the compound annual growth rate of our company’s tangible book value between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017, as described above under the heading “Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation — Status of PSU Awards.”

(4) Unvested RSUs held by Mr. Slosser at December 31, 2016 vest as follows: 26,778 RSUs vested in full on February 4, 2017, 4,214 RSUs will vest in full on February 10, 2018, and 8,242 will vest in full on February 10, 2020.

Unvested PSUs held by Mr. Slosser as of December 31, 2016 vest as follows: Based on financial performance through December 31, 2016, PSUs scheduled to vest on December 31, 2016 were fully forfeited upon certification of performance criteria by the Compensation Committee following the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2016 fiscal year. Although SEC rules require minimum reporting in this table of the 50% threshold level for outstanding PSUs at fiscal year-end, actual performance as of fiscal year-end indicates that achievement of the applicable performance goals is improbable. 16,118 PSUs are expected to vest on December 31, 2017 contingent on 50% achievement of performance goals related to the compound annual growth rate of our company’s tangible book value between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017, as described above under the heading “Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation — Status of PSU Awards.”

(5) On April 27, 2011, Mr. Fishman was awarded options to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock under the 2006 LTIP as a one-time grant for incentive and retention purposes, approved by the Compensation Committee to closer align Mr. Fishman’s equity ownership levels to other named executive officers. The options have an exercise price of $14.40, which was equivalent to the closing price of our common stock on April 26, 2011, the day preceding the date of grant, vested in full on the third anniversary of the date of grant, and will expire on the seventh anniversary of the date of grant. Mr. Fishman fully exercised these options on April 17, 2017.

Unvested RSUs held by Mr. Fishman at December 31, 2016 vest as follows: 20,084 RSUs vested in full on February 4, 2017, 4,214 RSUs will vest in full on February 10, 2018, and 8,242 will vest in full on February 10, 2020.

Unvested PSUs held by Mr. Fishman as of December 31, 2016 vest as follows: Based on financial performance through December 31, 2016, PSUs scheduled to vest on December 31, 2016 were fully forfeited upon certification of performance criteria by the Compensation Committee following the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2016 fiscal year. Although SEC rules require minimum reporting in this table of the 50% threshold level for outstanding PSUs at fiscal year-end, actual performance as of fiscal year-end indicates that achievement of the applicable performance goals is improbable. 16,118 PSUs are expected to vest on December 31, 2017 contingent on 50% achievement of performance goals related to the compound annual growth rate of our company’s tangible book value between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017, as described above under the heading “Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation — Status of PSU Awards.”

(6) Unvested RSUs held by Mr. Beske at December 31, 2016 vest as follows: 3,766 RSUs vested in full on February 4, 2017, 1,686 RSUs will vest in full on February 10, 2018, and 3,297 RSUs will vest in full on February 10, 2020.

Unvested PSUs held by Mr. Beske as of December 31, 2016 vest as follows: Based on financial performance through December 31, 2016, PSUs scheduled to vest on December 31, 2016 were fully forfeited upon certification of performance criteria by the Compensation Committee following the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2016 fiscal year. Although SEC rules require minimum reporting in this table of the 50% threshold level for outstanding PSUs at fiscal year-end, actual performance as of fiscal year-end indicates that achievement of the applicable performance goals is improbable. 9,211 PSUs are expected to vest on December 31, 2017 contingent on 50% achievement of performance goals related to the compound annual growth rate of our company’s tangible book value between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017, as described above under the heading “Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation — Status of PSU Awards.”

 

- 25 -


Table of Contents
(7) Unvested RSUs held by Mr. Neuhauser at December 31, 2016 vest as follows: 12,552 RSUs vested in full on February 4, 2017 and 2,950 RSUs will vest in full on February 10, 2018.

Unvested PSUs held by Mr. Neuhauser as of December 31, 2016 vest as follows: Based on financial performance through December 31, 2016, PSUs scheduled to vest on December 31, 2016 were fully forfeited upon certification of performance criteria by the Compensation Committee following the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2016 fiscal year. Although SEC rules require minimum reporting in this table of the 50% threshold level for outstanding PSUs at fiscal year-end, actual performance as of fiscal year-end indicates that achievement of the applicable performance goals is improbable. According to the terms of the Performance Share Unit Program, a pro-rata portion of PSUs vest in the event of retirement. Given Mr. Neuhauser’s retirement from our company on October 31, 2016, 7,034 of 11,513 PSUs would be expected to vest on December 31, 2017 contingent on 50% achievement of performance goals related to the compound annual growth rate of our company’s tangible book value between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017, as described above under the heading “Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation — Status of PSU Awards.”

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table provides information on the value realized by each of our named executive officers as a result of the exercise of stock options and vesting of RSUs during 2016.

 

     Option Awards      Stock Awards  

Name

   Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
     Value
Realized on
Exercise
     Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
     Value
Realized on
Vesting
 
     (#)      ($)      (#)      ($)  

Richard J. Hendrix(1)

     —          —          70,109        1,252,845  

Bradley J. Wright(2)

     3,000        480        69,830        1,231,532  

Kenneth P. Slosser(3)

     —          —          98,543        1,697,683  

Adam J. Fishman(4)

     10,000        1,600        109,109        1,884,335  

Gavin A. Beske(5)

     —          —          27,126        496,147  

James C. Neuhauser(6)

     —          —          82,851        1,425,815  

 

(1) RSUs/PSUs of Mr. Hendrix vested in 2016 as follows: 26,829 RSUs vested on February 5, 2016. The market price of our common stock on that date closed at $16.66. 43,280 PSUs vested on May 5, 2016. The market price of our common stock on that date closed at $18.62.
(2) On April 8, 2016, Mr. Wright exercised 3,000 stock options with an exercise price of $18.28. The market price of our common stock on that date closed at $18.44.

RSUs/PSUs of Mr. Wright vested in 2016 as follows: 4,878 RSUs vested on February 5, 2016. The market price of our common stock on that date closed at $16.66. 24,829 RSUs vested on February 8, 2016. The market price of our common stock on that date closed at $16.28. 4,168 RSUs vested on April 27, 2016. The market price of our common stock on that date closed at $18.37. 35,955 PSUs vested on May 5, 2016. The market price of our common stock on that date closed at $18.62.

(3) RSUs/PSUs of Mr. Slosser vested in 2016 as follows: 24,390 RSUs vested on February 5, 2016. The market price of our common stock on that date closed at $16.66. 38,198 RSUs vested on February 8, 2016. The market price of our common stock on that date closed at $16.28. 35,955 PSUs vested on May 5, 2016. The market price of our common stock on that date closed at $18.62.
(4) On April 8, 2016, Mr. Fishman exercised 10,000 stock options with an exercise price of $18.28. The market price of our common stock on that date closed at $18.44.

RSUs/PSUs of Mr. Fishman vested in 2016 as follows: 17,073 RSUs vested on February 5, 2016. The market price of our common stock on that date closed at $16.66. 47,747 RSUs vested on February 8, 2016. The market price of our common stock on that date closed at $16.28. 8,334 RSUs vested on April 27, 2016. The market price of our common stock on that date closed at $18.37. 35,955 PSUs vested on May 5, 2016. The market price of our common stock on that date closed at $18.62.

(5) RSUs/PSUs of Mr. Beske vested in 2016 as follows: 3,820 RSUs vested on February 8, 2016. The market price of our common stock on that date closed at $16.28. 23,306 PSUs vested on May 5, 2016. The market price of our common stock on that date closed at $18.62.

 

- 26 -


Table of Contents
(6) RSUs/PSUs of Mr. Neuhauser vested in 2016 as follows: 14,024 RSUs vested on February 5, 2016. The market price of our common stock on that date closed at $16.66. 38,198 RSUs vested on February 8, 2016. The market price of our common stock on that date closed at $16.28. 30,629 PSUs vested on May 5, 2016. The market price of our common stock on that date closed at $18.62.

Potential Payments Upon Termination

With the exception of our company’s employment agreement with Richard J. Hendrix, we do not have employment contracts or post-termination compensation agreements with any of our named executive officers, and we do not have contractual provisions or other arrangements with any of the named executive officers, which provide for payments at, following, or in connection with the resignation, severance, retirement or other termination (including constructive termination) of a named executive officer. Unvested stock options, restricted stock awards, PSUs and RSUs held by grantees, including those held by named executive officers, may vest upon a change in control (as defined in our 2006 LTIP) only if such awards are not assumed or substituted for by the successor company or would vest upon a qualifying termination of employment following a change in control, or upon termination of employment due to death or disability, as provided under the terms of our 2006 LTIP, our 2016 Retention and Incentive Plan or our Performance Share Unit Program, as applicable.

The following tables represent the payments and benefits due to our named executive officers under the 2006 LTIP and Mr. Hendrix’s employment agreement in the event that a termination of employment or change in control had occurred on December 31, 2016. As Mr. Neuhauser retired from our company as of October 31, 2016, he is not due any payments or benefits upon termination or change in control as of December 31, 2016, and thus is not included in the tables below. For further information on the terms of Mr. Hendrix’s employment agreement, see “Executive Compensation — Employment Agreement With Our Chief Executive Officer” above and also the actual employment agreement, which we filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 16, 2015.

Payments Due Upon Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason

 

Name

   Cash
Payment (1)
     Stock
Awards (2)(3)
     Performance
Share Unit
Awards(3)
     Option
Awards
     Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
     All Other
Compensation
     Benefits (4)      Total  
     ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)  

Richard J. Hendrix

     4,333,333        520,923        299,338        —          —          —          88,506        5,242,100  

Bradley J. Wright

     —          —          209,534        —          —          —          —          209,534  

Kenneth P. Slosser

     —          —          209,534        —          —          —          —          209,534  

Adam J. Fishman

     —          —          209,534        —          —          —          —          209,534  

Gavin A. Beske

     —          —          119,743        —          —          —          —          119,743  

 

(1) In the event of a termination of Mr. Hendrix’s services to us without cause or a resignation of Mr. Hendrix for good reason, Mr. Hendrix is entitled to receive a cash payment equal to two times the average total annual salary and performance bonus earned by and paid to Mr. Hendrix with respect to our three completed fiscal years preceding the date of termination, which shall be no less than $3.5 million and no more than $5 million. Such amount is to be paid in equal installments during the twelve (12)-month period following the date of termination in accordance with the regular payroll practices for the executive officers of our company, with the first payment to be made on the first payroll date immediately following the sixty-first (61st) day after the date of termination (with accrued and unpaid installments from the date of termination to be paid on the payroll date on which the first installment is paid) and the last installment to be paid on the payroll date on or immediately following the date that is twelve (12) months after the date of termination.

In addition, in the event of a termination of Mr. Hendrix’s services to us without cause or a resignation of Mr. Hendrix for good reason, the unpaid portion of any earned and accrued, but not yet paid, annual salary shall be paid to Mr. Hendrix in a lump sum within thirty days of the date of termination of his employment.

In the event of termination without cause or resignation for good reason as of December 31, 2016, Messrs. Wright, Slosser, Fishman and Beske would receive the unpaid portion of earned and accrued, but not yet paid, annual salary. As Mr. Neuhauser retired from our company as of October 31, 2016, no earned salary remained unpaid as of December 31, 2016.

(2) In the event of a termination of Mr. Hendrix’s services by us without cause or a resignation of Mr. Hendrix for good reason, all unvested incentive equity and equity-based awards, including any performance-based awards that are not intended to qualify as “performance based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, shall immediately vest and any time-based forfeiture restrictions shall immediately lapse.

 

- 27 -


Table of Contents
(3) According to the terms of Mr. Hendrix’s employment agreement and his award agreements under the Performance Share Unit Program, upon a termination without cause, or resignation for good reason, Mr. Hendrix’s PSUs, which are intended to qualify as “performance based compensation” under Section 162(m), shall be payable in full at the end of the applicable performance period if the associated performance goals are achieved. According to the terms of the Performance Share Unit Program, in the event of a termination without cause prior to a change in control, the PSUs awarded to executives other than Mr. Hendrix shall remain outstanding and be payable pro rata, based on the portion of performance period elapsed through termination date, at the end of the applicable performance period and only if the associated performance goals are achieved.

Actual performance as of fiscal year-end indicates that achievement of the applicable performance criteria is improbable and thus it is likely that the PSUs scheduled to vest on December 31, 2017 will be forfeited. Following filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2016 fiscal year, the PSUs scheduled to vest on December 31, 2016 were fully forfeited upon certification of performance criteria by the Compensation Committee, and thus are not included in this table.

It is assumed, however, for purposes of this table that the performance criteria under the Performance Share Unit Program are achieved at the 50% level for the 2015 PSU awards by the end of the respective performance period, as estimated above in the table of Outstanding Equity Awards at 2016 Fiscal Year-End. Amounts would be payable at the end of the applicable performance period.

The value of all RSUs that have time-based forfeiture provisions that would lapse is based on the number of shares multiplied by $13.00 per share, the closing price of our common stock on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of the year.

(4) In the event of a termination of Mr. Hendrix’s services by us without cause or a resignation of Mr. Hendrix for good reason, our company shall, for three years, provide Mr. Hendrix and his qualified beneficiaries health plan coverage through our group health plans while Mr. Hendrix is eligible under COBRA or shall reimburse Mr. Hendrix for premiums he incurs under a substantially similar private health insurance plan thereafter. For the purposes of this table, we assume that the cost of the health plan coverage is the same as the average per-employee amount we pay to provide our employees health care coverage in 2017, with an annual cost increase trend of 10%, as projected by our external healthcare benefits advisor.

Payments Due Upon Termination Without Cause Due to A Reduction in Workforce

 

Name

   Cash
Payment
    Stock
Awards(1)(2)
     Performance
Share Unit
Awards(2)
     Option
Awards
     Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
     All Other
Compensation(3)
     Benefits(1)      Total  
     ($)     ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)  

Richard J. Hendrix

     4,333,333  (1)      520,923        299,338        —          —          30,485        88,506        5,242,100  

Bradley J. Wright

     —         179,244        209,534        —          —          30,485        —          419,263  

Kenneth P. Slosser

     —         395,148        209,534        —          —          30,485        —          635,167  

Adam J. Fishman

     —         310,817        209,534        —          —          30,485        —          550,836  

Gavin A. Beske

     —         70,577        119,743        —          —          12,194        —          202,514  

 

(1) Our 2006 LTIP specifically contemplates a termination without cause due to a reduction in workforce, whereas Mr. Hendrix’s employment agreement contemplates a termination without cause more broadly. This table includes the same information for Mr. Hendrix as the table above entitled “Payments Due Upon Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason.” Please refer to the footnotes of that table for details of payments to Mr. Hendrix that would have been made if he had been terminated without cause due to a reduction in workforce on December 31, 2016.
(2) In the event of a termination without cause due to a reduction in workforce, and pursuant to our 2006 LTIP, our named executive officers’ unvested options shall be forfeited, RSUs subject to cliff vesting or annual pro rata vesting provisions shall vest pro rata and remaining unvested RSUs shall be forfeited, and all performance awards (as defined in the 2006 LTIP) shall be payable pro rata at the end of the applicable performance period and only if the associated performance goals are achieved. According to the terms of Mr. Hendrix’s employment agreement and his award agreements under the Performance Share Unit Program, upon a termination without cause due to a reduction in force, Mr. Hendrix’s PSUs shall be payable in full at the end of the applicable performance period if the associated performance goals are achieved.

It is assumed for purposes of this table that the performance goals under the Performance Share Unit Program are achieved at the 50% level for the 2015 PSU awards by the end of the respective performance period, as estimated above in the table of Outstanding Equity Awards at 2016 Fiscal Year-End. Amounts would be payable at the end of the applicable performance period.

The value of unvested RSUs is based on the number of RSUs that would vest in the event of a termination without cause due to a reduction in workforce multiplied by $13.00, which was the closing price of our common stock on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of the year.

 

- 28 -


Table of Contents
(3) In the event of a termination without cause due to a reduction in workforce, our named executive officers’ interests in the asset pool of non-FBR securities under the 2016 Retention and Incentive Plan shall vest pro rata.

Payments Due Upon Termination Due to Death or Disability

 

Name

   Cash
Payment
     Stock
Awards(1)
     Performance
Share Unit
Awards(1)
     Option
Awards
     Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
     All Other
Compensation(2)
     Benefits      Total  
     ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)  

Richard J. Hendrix

     —          520,923        299,338        —          —          136,946        —          957,207  

Bradley J. Wright

     —          281,476        209,534        —          —          136,946        —          627,956  

Kenneth P. Slosser

     —          510,042        209,534        —          —          136,946        —          856,522  

Adam J. Fishman

     —          423,020        209,534        —          —          136,946        —          769,500  

Gavin A. Beske

     —          113,737        119,743        —          —          54,778        —          288,258  

 

(1) In the event of a termination of Mr. Hendrix’s services to us due to his death or disability, and pursuant to his employment agreement with us, all unvested incentive equity and equity-based awards shall immediately vest and any time-based forfeiture restrictions shall immediately lapse; provided, however, that unvested equity-based awards that are intended to qualify as “performance based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code shall vest and be earned only upon achievement of the applicable performance goals.

In the event of a termination due to death or disability, and pursuant to the 2006 LTIP, unvested options shall immediately vest and become fully exercisable (and remain exercisable for one year), all unvested RSUs shall fully vest and become free of all restrictions and deferral limitations, and all performance awards (as defined in the 2006 LTIP) shall be considered to be earned and payable and any deferral or other restriction shall lapse. Under the terms of the Performance Share Unit Program, upon termination due to death or disability, a PSU award under the Performance Share Unit Program shall remain outstanding until the end of the performance period, and the participant shall be eligible to earn the number of shares of common stock in respect of an Award equal to the number of PSUs that the participant would have earned based on the level of achievement of the performance goal at the end of the performance period.

It is assumed for purposes of this table that the performance goals under the Performance Share Unit Program are achieved at the 50% level for the 2015 PSU awards by the end of the performance period, as estimated above in the table of Outstanding Equity Awards at 2016 Fiscal Year-End. Amounts would be payable at the end of the applicable performance period.

The value of unvested RSUs is based on the number of RSUs that would vest in the event of a termination due to death or disability multiplied by $13.00, which was the closing price of our common stock on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of the year.

For purposes of this table, we assume that each named executive officer died or became disabled on December 31, 2016.

(2) Amounts represent the interests held as of December 31, 2016 in the asset pool of non-FBR securities under the 2016 Retention and Incentive Plan.

Payments Due Upon Termination Following Change in Control

 

Name

   Cash
Payment
     Stock
Awards (1)
     Performance
Share Unit
Awards (1)(2)
     Option
Awards
     Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
     All Other
Compensation(1)
     Benefits      Total  
     ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)  

Richard J. Hendrix

     —          107,146        659,971        —          —          136,946        —          904,063  

Bradley J. Wright

     —          107,146        452,959        —          —          136,946        —          697,051  

Kenneth P. Slosser

     —          107,146        452,959        —          —          136,946        —          697,051  

Adam J. Fishman

     —          107,146        452,959        —          —          136,946        —          697,051  

Gavin A. Beske

     —          42,861        273,013        —          —          54,778        —          370,652  

 

(1) The value of unvested RSUs is based on the number of RSUs that would vest upon a change in control multiplied by $13.00, which was the closing price of our common stock on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of the year.

 

- 29 -


Table of Contents

Unless an award agreement made under the 2006 LTIP states otherwise, upon a change in control, unvested options shall immediately vest and become fully exercisable, unvested RSUs subject to time based restrictions shall fully vest and become free of all restrictions and deferral limitations, and all performance awards (as defined in the 2006 LTIP) shall be considered to be earned and payable and any deferral or other restriction shall lapse.

Certain award agreements for our named executive officers state that the Compensation Committee shall determine the impact of a change in control, including whether RSUs and options will vest and become free of restrictions and deferral limitations or will be assumed or substituted for by the successor company. For purposes of this table, it is assumed the Compensation Committee determined that the RSUs and options subject only to this provision of the 2006 LTIP were assumed or substituted for by the successor company.

According to the terms of our 2016 Retention and Incentive Plan, upon termination within two years following a Change in Control, awards under this program, including RSUs and interests in the pool of non-FBR securities, shall vest in full.

(2) Under the Performance Share Unit Program, upon a change in control, the performance period shall end and the Compensation Committee shall measure the level of achievement of the performance goal based on our company’s performance for the most recently completed fiscal quarter prior to such change in control. The number of PSUs earned by a participant shall be determined and fixed based on the greater of (A) our company’s actual performance (B) the level of achievement resulting in 50% of the PSUs being earned. The earned PSUs convert to time vested awards payable following the end of the restriction period, concurrent with the original performance period, subject to continued employment with our company through such date.

It is assumed for purposes of this table that the performance goals under the Performance Share Unit Program are achieved at 50% level for the 2014 and 2015 PSU awards by the end of the respective performance period. Amounts would be payable at the end of the applicable original performance period.

Risk Management

We review our compensation practices to determine whether the risks arising from our compensation policies and practices would be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company. As part of this process, our management risk committee looks at how we allocate capital to each business unit and the internal monitoring and control systems in place for each business unit, and whether, in light of the foregoing, our incentive compensation arrangements with regard to each business unit has any features that might encourage inappropriate or excessive risk-taking that could threaten the value of our company. Our management risk committee has reviewed plan documentation, eligibility criteria, payout formulas and payment history, and how evaluation of business risk affects incentive plan performance measures and compensation decisions. Our management risk committee has discussed the results of this analysis with our Human Resources Group and our Executive Committee, and summarized the results for our Board of Directors.

Based upon these reviews, we have not identified any risks arising from our compensation policies and practices that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company.

We are a financial institution that engages in significant trading and capital market activities that are subject to market and other risks. Our company employs risk management practices, including trading limits, marking-to-market positions, stress testing and employment of models. The Compensation Committee understands and appreciates that equity incentive compensation can promote high-risk behavior if the incentives it creates for short-term performance are not properly aligned with the interests of our company over the long-term. The Compensation Committee believes that the structure of our company’s long-term equity incentive compensation appropriately mitigates the risk by directly aligning the recipients’ interests with those of our company. We use judgment and discretion rather than rely solely on formulaic results and do not use highly leveraged incentives that drive risky short-term behavior. Instead, we reward consistent and longer-term performance. Our long-term equity incentive compensation rewards long-term stock performance.

The Compensation Committee will continue to evaluate any new incentive arrangements for our named executive officers and will be involved in the design and assessment of our incentive arrangements to the extent appropriate or required under applicable law.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During our last completed fiscal year, Dr. Aggarwal, Ms. Leopold Tilley, and Messrs. Hynes, Patterson, Reimers and Strome served on the Compensation Committee. None of these directors served, during our last fiscal year or in any prior year, as one of our officers or employees, except Mr. Strome, who was an employee of our company from 2001 to 2006. None of our executive officers served on the compensation committee or board of directors of any company that employed any member of the Board of Directors (including the Compensation Committee).

 

- 30 -


Table of Contents

Compensation of Non-Employee Directors

As compensation for serving on our Board of Directors, each director who is not an employee of our company or an employee of any of our affiliates receives a retainer of $135,000 per year, provided that (i) the Lead Director receives a retainer of $185,000 per year and (ii) the Chairman of the Audit Committee receives a retainer of $160,000 per year. In each case, the retainer is paid, at the director’s election, in cash and/or equity-based compensation granted under our Amended and Restated 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2006 LTIP”), provided that no less than 50% of the retainer must be paid in equity-based compensation. Non-employee directors may, at their choice, receive options, restricted shares of common stock (“RS”) and/or restricted stock units (“RSUs”) as their equity-based compensation. Each RSU generally represents the right to receive one share of our common stock.

Mr. Hendrix did not receive any separate or additional compensation in 2016 for his service as a member of our Board of Directors. See our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 6 and our executive compensation tables beginning on page 17 for a description of Mr. Hendrix’s 2015 compensation.

The annual compensation period for non-employee directors is the year between annual meetings of our shareholders. Options, RS or RSUs are granted annually at the time of the annual meeting. We pay the cash portion of the annual retainer in equal quarterly payments in arrears.

In 2016, each non-employee director earned (i) a pro rata amount of the cash portion of his or her 2015-2016 annual retainer, if any, and (ii) a pro rata amount of the cash portion of his or her 2016-2017 annual retainer, if any. On June 17, 2016, each then non-employee director became entitled to receive his or her 2016-2017 annual retainer, as follows: Dr. Aggarwal, one-half of her 2016-2017 annual retainer in RS granted on June 17, 2016, and one-half in cash payable as set forth above; Mr. Hynes, one-half of his 2016-2017 annual retainer in RS granted on June 17, 2016, and one-half in cash payable as set forth above; Mr. Kraemer, one-half of his 2016-2017 annual retainer in RSUs granted on June 17, 2016, and one-half in cash payable as set forth above; Ms. Leopold Tilley, one-half of her 2016-2017 annual retainer in RS granted on June 17, 2016, and one-half in cash payable as set forth above; Mr. Patterson, one-half of his 2016-2017 annual retainer in RS granted on June 17, 2016, and one-half in cash payable as set forth above; Mr. Reimers, one-half of his 2016-2017 annual retainer in RS granted on June 17, 2016, and one-half in cash payable as set forth above; and Mr. Strome, one-half of his 2016-2017 annual retainer in RSUs granted on June 17, 2016, and one-half in cash payable as set forth above. Accordingly, on June 17, 2016, Dr. Aggarwal was granted 4,208 RS and was scheduled to be paid $67,500 in cash, Mr. Hynes was granted 4,208 RS and was scheduled to be paid $67,500 in cash, Mr. Kraemer was granted 4,988 RSUs and was scheduled to be paid $80,000 in cash, Ms. Patterson was granted 4,208 RS and was scheduled to be paid $67,500 in cash, Mr. Reimers was granted 5,767 RS and was scheduled to be paid $92,500 in cash and Mr. Strome was granted 4,208 RSUs and was scheduled to be paid $67,500 in cash. Upon her election to the Board of Directors on February 10, 2016, Ms. Leopold Tilley was awarded a grant of 2,500 RS as a new director grant, and elected to receive one-half of the pro rata portion of her 2015-2016 annual retainer in cash, and one-half in options. Accordingly Ms. Leopold Tilley was granted 9,800 options, an aggregate of 6,708 RS and was scheduled to receive $45,000 in cash payable as set forth above.

The unvested RSUs granted to Messrs. Kraemer and Strome each represent the right to receive one share of common stock, which right will vest in full on June 17, 2017 (“vested RSUs”). Vested RSUs are settled in shares of our company’s common stock one year from the date the director ceases to be a director. The RS granted to Dr. Aggarwal and Messrs. Hynes, Patterson and Reimers are outstanding shares of common stock that will vest on June 17, 2017. The options granted to Ms. Leopold Tilley are options to purchase shares of common stock that vested and became exercisable on February 10, 2017. In each case, vesting of the applicable equity compensation award is subject to the applicable non-employee director’s continued service on the board through the one-year anniversary of the date of grant. The number of shares subject to the RSUs granted to Messrs. Kraemer and Strome, and the number of RS granted to Dr. Aggarwal and Messrs. Hynes and Reimers, was determined using the closing price of our company’s stock on the close of trading at June 17, 2016. The number of options granted to Ms. Leopold Tilley was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the closing price of FBR common stock as of February 10, 2016, the date of grant.

For information on the valuation of RS, RSUs and options, please refer to Note 11 in the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

We do not pay our non-employee directors per meeting-attendance fees. We reimburse our directors for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings of our Board of Directors and its committees and corporate events that directors may be asked to attend.

 

- 31 -


Table of Contents

Non-Employee Director Compensation Table for 2016

The following table contains compensation information for our non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

Name

   Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash
($)(1)
     Restricted Stock/
Restricted
Stock
Unit
Awards
($)(2)(3)(4)
     Option
Awards
($)(4)
     All Other
Compensation
($)(5)
     Total ($)  

Reena Aggarwal(4)

     67,500        67,496        —          2,880        137,876  

Thomas J. Hynes, Jr.(4)(6)

     16,875        67,496        —          4,078        88,449  

Richard A. Kraemer(4)

     80,000        80,008        —          —          160,008  

Allison M. Leopold Tilley(4)(7)

     45,000        108,796        28,125        3,683        185,604  

Mark R. Patterson(4)

     67,500        67,496        —          4,687        139,683  

Arthur J. Reimers(4)(8)

     23,125        92,503        —          5,588        121,216  

William F. Strome(4)

     67,500        67,496        —          —          134,996  

 

(1) Includes the cash portion, if any, of each director’s (i) 2015-2016 annual retainer for the time between January 1, 2016 and the 2016 annual meeting of our shareholders and (ii) 2016-2017 annual retainer for the time between the 2016 annual meeting of our shareholders and December 31, 2016.
(2) Includes the aggregate grant date fair value of the portion of the 2016-2017 annual retainer that each non-employee director elected to receive in RS or RSUs.
(3) Amounts relating to stock-based awards represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock-based award computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The discussion of the assumptions used for purposes of the valuation of RS and RSUs granted for fiscal year 2016 appears in Note 11 in the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(4) The number of shares of RS that have been awarded and are outstanding under the 2006 LTIP to our non-employee directors includes: Dr. Aggarwal — 4,208 shares of RS, Mr. Hynes — 4,208 shares of RS, Ms. Leopold Tilley — 4,208 shares of RS, Mr. Patterson — 4,208 shares of RS, and Mr. Reimers — 5,767 shares of RS. The number of RSUs that have been awarded and are outstanding under the 2006 LTIP to our non-employee directors includes: Dr. Aggarwal — 2,500 RSUs, Mr. Hynes — 17,538 RSUs, Mr. Kraemer — 29,622 RSUs, and Mr. Strome — 11,659 RSUs. The number of options that have been awarded and are outstanding under the 2006 LTIP to our non-employee directors includes: Mr. Hynes — 5,470 options, Mr. Kraemer — 9,529 options, Ms. Leopold Tilley — 9,800 options and Mr. Reimers — 10,941 options.
(5) Includes dividend payments on RS that were unvested during 2016.
(6) Mr. Hynes elected to receive 100% equity compensation for his 2015-2016 annual retainer, all of which was granted in June 2015. Cash compensation received in 2016 was for the cash compensation portion of his 2016-2017 annual retainer.
(7) Ms. Leopold Tilley was elected to the Board of Directors in February 2016 and received a new director grant of 2,500 RS. At that time, Ms. Leopold Tilley elected to receive 50% equity compensation in the form of options for her 2015 – 2016 prorated annual retainer.
(8) Mr. Reimers elected to receive 100% equity compensation for his 2015-2016 annual retainer, all of which was granted in June 2015. Cash compensation received in 2016 was for the cash compensation portion of his 2016-2017 annual retainer.

 

- 32 -


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The following report is submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of FBR & Co. (the “Company”), which is composed of six independent directors, Messrs. Reimers, Hynes, Patterson, and Strome and Dr. Aggarwal and Ms. Leopold Tilley. The Board of Directors has concluded that each member of the Compensation Committee is independent, and that during 2016 each member of the Compensation Committee was independent, in each case according to the independence standards set forth in the NASDAQ listing standards and our company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.

The Compensation Committee oversees our company’s compensation program on behalf of the Board of Directors. During 2016, the Compensation Committee met eight (8) times. In fulfilling its oversight duties, the Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed with management the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” set forth in this report.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in the proxy statement and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. The report of the Compensation Committee set forth in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C under the Exchange Act or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. In addition, it shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any statement that incorporates this report by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that our company specifically incorporates this information by reference.

 

Respectfully submitted,

Arthur J. Reimers, Chairman

Reena Aggarwal

Thomas J. Hynes, Jr.

Allison M. Leopold Tilley

Mark R. Patterson

William F. Strome

 

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

Security Ownership of Management

The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock known by us to be beneficially owned at April 20, 2017, by each director, each nominee for director, each named executive officer and all directors and executive officers as a group.

For purposes of the table below, beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act. Unless indicated otherwise in the footnotes to the table below, each individual has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock shown as beneficially owned by such person.

 

     FBR & Co.  
     Common Stock  

Name of Beneficial Owners

   Shares
Beneficially
Owned
    Percent of
Class(1)
 
     (#)        

Richard J. Hendrix

     410,328  (2)      5.7

Bradley J. Wright

     67,647       1.0

Gavin A. Beske

     25,692       *  

Adam J. Fishman

     147,566       2.1

Kenneth P. Slosser

     116,307       1.6

Reena Aggarwal

     24,748  (3)(9)      *  

Thomas J. Hynes, Jr.

     21,215  (4)(9)      *  

Richard A. Kraemer

     18,648  (5)(9)      *  

Allison M. Leopold Tilley

     16,508 (6)      *  

Mark R. Patterson

     229,250  (7)      3.2

Arthur J. Reimers

     99,435 (8)      1.4

William F. Strome

     6,989 (9)      *  

All executive officers and directors of FBR as a group(13 persons)

     1,191,902       16.4

 

* Less than 1%.

 

- 33 -


Table of Contents
(1) Based on 7,099,114 shares of our company’s common stock outstanding as of April 20, 2017. Shares of our company’s common stock subject to options and currently exercisable, or exercisable within 60 days of April 20, 2017, are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the class owned by the person holding such options but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the class owned by any other person. Shares of our company’s RSUs that entitle holders to receive unrestricted shares of common stock within 60 days of April 20, 2017 are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the class owned by the person holding such RSUs but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the class owned by any other person.
(2) The number of shares of our company’s common stock shown as beneficially owned by Mr. Hendrix includes 157,500 shares of our common stock issuable to Mr. Hendrix upon exercise of options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 20, 2017.
(3) The number of shares of our company’s common stock shown as beneficially owned by Dr. Aggarwal includes 4,208 shares of RS.
(4) The number of shares of our company’s common stock shown as beneficially owned by Mr. Hynes includes 5,470 shares of our common stock issuable to Mr. Hynes upon exercise of options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 20, 2017 and 4,208 shares of RS.
(5) The number of shares of our company’s common stock shown as beneficially owned by Mr. Kraemer includes 9,529 shares of our common stock issuable to Mr. Kraemer upon exercise of options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 20, 2017.
(6) The number of shares of our company’s common stock shown as beneficially owned by Ms. Leopold Tilley includes 9,800 shares of our common stock issuable to Ms. Leopold Tilley upon exercise of options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 20, 2017 and 4,208 share of RS.
(7) The number of shares of our company’s common stock shown as beneficially owned by Mr. Patterson includes 4,208 shares of RS.
(8) The number of shares of our company’s common stock shown as beneficially owned by Mr. Reimers includes 10,941 shares of our common stock issuable to Mr. Reimers upon exercise of options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 20, 2017 and 5,767 share of RS.
(9) The number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by each of our non-employee directors and director nominees does not include the non-employee director RSUs that have been awarded under the 2006 LTIP, in the following amounts: Dr. Aggarwal – 2,500 RSUs, Mr. Hynes — 17,538 RSUs, Mr. Kraemer — 29,622 RSUs, and Mr. Strome — 11,659 RSUs.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by any person (including any “group” as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act), other than members of management (who are included in the table above), who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five % of our voting securities.

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

   Title of Class    Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
    Percent of
Class(1)
 

NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC
2049 Century Park East, 16th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067

   Common Stock      645,278 (2)      9.1

Boston Partners
One Beacon Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02108

   Common Stock      641,647 (3)      9.0

Standard General L.P. and associated persons
767 Fifth Avenue, 12th Floor
New York, New York 10153

   Common Stock      496,383 (4)      7.0

BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, New York 10055

   Common Stock      485,752 (5)      6.8

Richard J. Hendrix
1300 North Seventeenth Street
Arlington, Virginia 22209

   Common Stock      410,328 (6)      5.7

 

- 34 -


Table of Contents

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

   Title of Class      Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
    Percent of
Class(1)
 

PEAK6 Capital Management LLC and associated persons
141 W. Jackson Boulevard, Suite 500
Chicago, Illinois 60604

     Common Stock        359,598 (7)      5.1

The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Boulevard
Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

     Common Stock        359,349 (8)      5.1

 

(1) Based on 7,099,114 shares of our company’s common stock outstanding as of April 20, 2017.
(2) This information is based on a Schedule 13G/A report filed with the SEC by NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC (“NWQ”) on February 3, 2017. The number of shares of our company’s common stock shown as beneficially owned by NWQ includes 645,278 shares over which NWQ has sole voting power and 645,278 shares over which NWQ has sole dispositive power. NWQ may have acquired or sold shares of our company’s common stock since the report on Schedule 13G/A was filed with the SEC on February 3, 2017.
(3) This information is based on a Schedule 13G/A report filed with the SEC by Boston Partners on February 10, 2017. The number of shares of our company’s common stock shown as beneficially owned by Boston Partners includes 641,647 shares over which Boston Partners has sole dispositive power and 382,045 shares over which Boston Partners has sole voting power. Boston Partners may have acquired or sold shares of our company’s common stock since the report on Schedule 13G/A was filed with the SEC on February 10, 2017.
(4) This information is based on a Schedule 13G/A report filed with the SEC by Standard General L.P. (“Standard General”) on February 15, 2017. The number of shares of our company’s common stock shown as beneficially owned by Standard General includes 496,383 shares over which Standard General has sole voting power and 496,383 shares over which Standard General has sole dispositive power. Standard General may have acquired or sold shares of our company’s common stock since the report on Schedule 13G/A was filed with the SEC on February 15, 2017.
(5) This information is based on a Schedule 13G report filed with the SEC by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) on January 30, 2017. The number of shares of our company’s common stock shown as beneficially owned by BlackRock includes 485,752 shares over which BlackRock has sole dispositive power and 476,403 shares over which BlackRock has sole voting power. BlackRock may have acquired or sold shares of our company’s common stock since the report on Schedule 13G was filed with the SEC on January 30, 2017.
(6) The number of shares of our company’s common stock shown as beneficially owned by Mr. Hendrix includes 127,500 shares of our common stock issuable to Mr. Hendrix upon exercise of options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 20, 2017.
(7) This information is based on a Schedule 13G report filed with the SEC by PEAK6 Capital Management LLC (“PEAK6”) on February 7, 2017. The number of shares of our company’s common stock shown as beneficially owned by PEAK6 includes 359,598 shares over which PEAK6 has sole voting power and 359,598 shares over which PEAK6 has sole dispositive power. PEAK6 may have acquired or sold shares of our company’s common stock since the report on Schedule 13G was filed with the SEC on February 7, 2017.
(8) This information is based on a Schedule 13G report filed with the SEC by The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”) on February 10, 2017. The number of shares of our company’s common stock shown as beneficially owned by Vanguard is 359,349 shares. Vanguard has sole dispositive power over 352,161 shares, and has shared dispositive power and sole voting power over 7,188 shares. Vanguard may have acquired or sold shares of our company’s common stock since the report on Schedule 13G was filed with the SEC on February 10, 2017.

 

- 35 -


Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2016, information with respect to compensation plans under which equity securities were authorized for issuance:

 

Plan Category

   Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
    Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
     Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans
 
     (#)     ($)      (#)  

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Shareholders

     343,660  (1)    $ 21.83        2,446,245  
     910,666  (2)      N/A     

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Shareholders

     —         —          —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     1,254,326     $ 21.83        2,446,245  
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Represents stock options.
(2) Represents 25,099 shares of RS and 885,567 RSUs. Assumes that all applicable performance targets will be met, and as a result, performance-based RSUs will vest.

Actual financial performance as of fiscal year-end 2016 indicates that achievement of the performance goal applicable to the 230,258 PSUs granted in 2015 is improbable, and thus it is likely that those PSUs will be forfeited.

 

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Transactions With Executive Officers, Directors and Other Related Persons

Margret L. Nedelkoff, the wife of Mr. Neuhauser, was hired in 2004 and was employed through May 8, 2015 by FBR Capital Markets & Co., as a Managing Director and Head of Corporate Strategy and Business Development in FBR’s Investment Banking Division. Subsequent to her departure, she served as a consultant on various strategy-related projects. During 2016, Ms. Nedelkoff was paid an aggregate of $17,800 in consulting fees. Mr. Neuhauser did not have any role in determining the consulting fees paid to his wife. Ms. Nedelkoff’s consulting compensation was determined jointly by our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Richard J. Hendrix, and our Chief Financial Officer, Bradley J. Wright.

We engage in ordinary course trading, brokerage and similar transactions with BlackRock, Inc., Boston Partners, NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC, PEAK6 Capital Management LLC, Standard General L.P., and The Vanguard Group, all of whom are 5% or greater shareholders of the company. The transactions we conduct with these firms are negotiated on an arms-length basis and contain customary standard market terms.

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions With Related Persons

Our written Statement of Business Principles applies to any related party transaction with any of our executive officers or directors, and it is the practice of our Board of Directors that any such transactions that are not in the ordinary course of business or are not performed on standard market terms must be approved by a majority of the disinterested members of our Board of Directors or our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. In addition, it is the practice of our Board of Directors that any transaction with any shareholder known to beneficially own more than 5% of a class of our voting securities, or its related persons, that is not in the ordinary course of business or is not performed on standard market terms must be approved by a majority of the disinterested members of our Board of Directors or our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. We refer to the foregoing policies and practices as our “Related Party Transaction Policy.”

The terms of the agreements and transactions described under “Transactions with Executive Officers, Directors and Other Related Persons” were reviewed and approved or ratified in accordance with our Related Party Transaction Policy, except the trading, brokerage and similar transactions with 5% holders, which were conducted in the ordinary course of business on standard market terms.

 

- 36 -


Table of Contents

Pursuant to its charter, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also periodically reviews transactions with related persons and our conflict of interest policies as set forth in our Statement of Business Principles concerning directors and executive officers, and reviews with management our procedures for implementing and monitoring compliance with the conflict of interest policies.

Certain of our executive officers and directors may invest their personal funds in amounts that exceed $120,000 in securities underwritten by FBR Capital Markets & Co., or otherwise engage in transactions in the ordinary course of business involving goods and services provided by FBR Capital Markets & Co. and its affiliates, such as brokerage services, on the same terms and with the same conditions as those offered or provided to non-affiliated third parties. These transactions are reviewed in accordance with the policy stated above.

Independence of our Board of Directors

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines specify that an “independent” director is a director who meets the independence requirements of the NASDAQ listing standards, as then in effect, and of such additional guidelines as our Board may have adopted or may adopt in the future. These standards provide a baseline for determining the independence of members of the Board. The independence standards used by our Board are detailed in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on our website at www.fbr.com under “Investor Relations.”

In making affirmative independence determinations, our Board broadly considers all relevant facts and circumstances, including, among other factors, the extent to which we make charitable contributions to tax exempt organizations with which the director, or director’s immediate family member, is affiliated. Using these criteria, the Board has affirmatively determined that the following directors have had no material relationship with our company and are independent under the NASDAQ listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines: Dr. Aggarwal, Mr. Hynes, Mr. Kraemer, Ms. Leopold Tilley, Mr. Patterson, Mr. Reimers and Mr. Strome. There were no other transactions, relationships or arrangements not otherwise disclosed herein that were considered by our Board when determining whether each director and nominee for director is independent.

 

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Audit and Other Fees

Aggregate fees for professional services rendered to us and our subsidiaries by BDO USA, LLP (“BDO”) for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows (in thousands):

 

     Year Ended December 31,  

Fee Type

   2016      2015  

Audit Fees

   $ 618      $ 528  

Audit-Related Fees

     35        27  

Tax Fees

     —          —    

All Other Fees

     —          —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 653      $ 555  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Audit Fees

Audit Fees represent the aggregate fees billed for each of our last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by BDO for the audit of our consolidated financial statements, the audit of the financial statements of our subsidiaries, the audit of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, the review of the financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and other services that are provided by BDO in connection with the statutory and regulatory filings that we and our subsidiaries are required to make, issuances of consents, and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.

Audit-Related Fees

Audit-Related Fees represent the aggregate fees billed for each of our last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by BDO for the audit of our employee’s 401(k) benefit plan.

 

- 37 -


Table of Contents

All Other Fees

All Other Fees represent the aggregate fees billed in each of our last two fiscal years for products and services provided by BDO other than the services reported in “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees” and “Tax Fees” in the table above.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

It is the Audit Committee’s policy to review and, if appropriate, pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee pre-approved all of the services provided by BDO to our company and our subsidiaries during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

 

- 38 -


Table of Contents

PART IV

 

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS

 

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report.

Exhibits:

Exhibits are incorporated herein by reference or are filed with this report as indicated below (numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K):

 

Exhibit

Number

  

Description

31.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
31.2    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

 

* Filed herewith.

 

- 39 -


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

  FBR & CO.
Date: April 21, 2017   By:  

/s/ Richard J. Hendrix

    Richard J. Hendrix
    Chief Executive Officer

 

 

- 40 -