---

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

---

 

 

---

 

 

Commission file number: 001-34294

 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  

(Title of Class)

 

(Name of exchange on which registered)

 

Indicate by check mark if registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.   Yes o No x

 

Indicate by check mark if registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.   Yes o    No x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x    No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Date file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (Section232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).      Yes ☒    No o  

  

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     Yes o    No x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.   Check one:

 

 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2016, computed by reference to the closing price of that date, was $38,364.

 

On March 31, 2017, the registrant had 14,445,363 shares of Common Stock outstanding

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o   No  ☒

 

 

 

 

ASAP Expo Inc.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

to Annual Report on Form 10-K

for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016

 

 

 

PART I

 

 

Except for historical information, the following annual report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”) contains forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve certain risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27a of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21e of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, include statements regarding, among other things, and specifically in the sections entitled “Description of Business” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations,” or otherwise incorporated by reference into this document contain “forward-looking statements” (as such term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995)..  Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies, and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “plan”, “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend,” or “project” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology.  This information may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from the future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. These statements may be found in this Annual Report under the sections entitled “Description of Business” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”. Actual events or results may differ materially from those discussed in forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, without limitation, the risks outlined under the section herein entitled “Risk Factors” and matters described in this Annual Report generally. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report will in fact occur as projected.

 

In this Annual Report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States dollars. All references to “common shares” refer to the common shares in our capital stock.  As used in this Annual Report, the terms “we,” “us,” “our” and the “Company” mean ASAP Expo Inc. unless otherwise indicated.

 

 

ASAP Expo, Inc. (“ASAP Expo” or the “Company” or “We” or “Our”) d.b.a. ASAP International Holdings Inc., was incorporated on April 10, 2007 under the laws of the State of Nevada.

ASAP Expo is a company that operates commercial real estate consulting for Chinese Institutions and high net worth individuals. Our mission is to be the bridge between China and the Western world.

Commercial Real Estate division provides Chinese institutional and high net worth individual home office with all real estate related services focusing on hospitality including acquisition advisory, financing, asset management, and strategic repositioning. Our international reach, scope of services and dedication to achieving the best results ensures our clients gain competitive advantage.

In the hospitality acquisition side, we represent buyers at all stages of the process, from advice on selection and location to opportunity sourcing, due diligence and secure the debt financing. Our clients have the advantage of our local market knowledge and contacts in capital markets around the globe, as well as our deep experience in real estate strategy and management. This means a broader value perspective on property utilization prospects—not to mention a finger on the pulse of real-time market conditions at any moment.

 

EMPLOYEES

 

As of December 31, 2016, ASAP Expo employed 5 full-time employees.  The Company believes that relations with its employees are good.

 

COMPETITORS

 

According to the management’s best information, there are currently a limited number of similar investment consulting and commercial real estate firms in the market who focuses on similar Chinese clients, but, in the future, there might be other new players that enter into the business and compete with us, despite the intellectual and financial capital required.

 

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS RELATING TO ASAP EXPO  

 

The following risk factors include, among other things, cautionary statements with respect to certain forward-looking statements, including statements of certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to vary materially from the future results referred to in such forward-looking statements.

 

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

 

We are subject to all applicable laws, policies and regulations that govern the financial guarantee industry in China, including those adopted by China’s central bank, the People’s Bank of China (“PBOC”), which sets monetary policy and, together with the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (“SAFE”), foreign-exchange policies. According to the 1995 Central Bank law, the State Council maintains oversight of PBOC policies.

 

Regulations were recently promulgated by State Development and Reform Commission, or SDRC, and SAFE, that require registration with, and approval from, PRC government authorities in connection with direct or indirect offshore investment activities by individuals who are PRC residents and PRC corporate entities. These regulations may apply to the Company’s future offshore or cross-border acquisitions, as well as to the equity interests in offshore companies held by the Company’s PRC shareholders who are considered PRC residents. The Company intends to make all required applications and filings and will require the shareholders of the offshore entities in the Company’s corporate group who are considered PRC residents to make the application and filings as required under these regulations and under any implementing rules or approval practices that may be established under these regulations. However, because these regulations are relatively new and lacking implementing rules or reconciliation with other approval requirements, it remains uncertain how these regulations and any future legislation concerning offshore or cross-border transactions will be interpreted and implemented by the relevant government authorities.

The approval criteria by SDRC agencies for outbound investment by PRC residents are not provided under the relevant SDRC regulations. Also, the criteria for registration with SAFE agencies, and whether such registration procedure is discretionary, are still uncertain as the criteria, if any, are not provided for under relevant SDRC regulations. Furthermore, there is a lack of relevant registration precedents for us to determine the registration criteria in practice. Accordingly, the Company cannot provide any assurances that we will be able to comply with, qualify under or obtain any registration or approval as required by these regulations or other related legislations. Further, we cannot assure you that our shareholders would not be considered PRC residents, given uncertainties as to what constitutes a PRC resident for the purposes of the regulation, or that if they are deemed PRC residents, they would (or would be able to) comply with the requirements. Our failure or the failure of our PRC resident shareholders to obtain these approvals or registrations may restrict our ability to acquire a company outside of China or use our entities outside of China to acquire or establish companies inside of China, which could negatively affect our business and future prospects.

 

As a U.S. public company, we are also subject to Federal and state securities laws. 

 

WE ARE SUBJECT TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS WHICH COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE COMPANY’S BUSINESS.

 

The primary source of income of the Company’s commercial real estate Division is from the hotels bought by Chinese large corporations and high-net worth individuals. Capital transferred into the United States are heavily regulated by the United States government. If the United States government imposes limitations on accepting investment from China, it will adversely affect the Company’s business.

 

WE ARE SUBJECT TO FOREIGN GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS WHICH COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE COMPANY’S BUSINESS.

 

The primary source of income of the Company’s Commercial Real Estate Division is from overseas investors purchasing Hotels in the U.S. Foreign governments may advise their approval to allow investment abroad. Such policies could adversely affect the Company’s commercial real estate transaction consultant revenue.

 

LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY

Until February 28, 2009, the Company operated a business consisting of organizing trade shows and events. The Company abandoned this line of business in March of 2009 and the Company entered the investment consulting business full time. In mid-2012, the Company switched its business direction to be a consultant company to assist Chinese Institution and high net individuals acquire U.S. hotels and perform asset management role after acquired.

 

LIMITED PUBLIC MARKET FOR THE COMPANY’S COMMON STOCK

There is currently a limited public market for the shares of the Company’s common stock. There can be no assurances that such limited market will continue or that any shares of the Company’s common stock may be sold without incurring a loss. The market price of the Company’s common stock may not necessarily bear any relationship to the Company’s book value, assets, past operating results, financial condition or any other established criteria of value, and may not be indicative of the market price for its common stock in the future. Further, the market price for the Company’s common stock may be volatile depending on a number of factors, including business performance, industry dynamics, news announcements or changes in general economic conditions.

LOW-PRICED STOCKS

The Company’s common stock is currently listed for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, which is generally considered to be a less efficient market than markets such as NASDAQ or other national exchanges, and which make it more difficult for the Company’s shareholders to conduct trades. It may also make it more difficult for the Company to obtain future financing. Further, the Company’s securities are subject to the “penny stock rules” adopted pursuant to Section 15 (g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The penny stock rules apply to non-NASDAQ companies whose common stock trades at less than $5.00 per share or which have tangible net worth of less than $5,000,000 ($2,000,000 if the company has been operating for three or more years). Such rules require, among other things, that brokers who trade “penny stock” to persons other than “established customers” complete certain documentation, make suitability inquiries of investors and provide investors with certain information concerning trading in the security, including a risk disclosure document and quote information under certain circumstances. Many brokers have decided not to trade “penny stocks” because of the requirements of the penny stock rules and, as a result, the number of broker-dealers willing to act as market makers in such securities is limited. In the event that the Company remains subject to the “penny stock rules” for any significant period, there may develop an adverse impact on the market, if any, for the Company’s securities. Because the Company’s securities are subject to the “penny stock rules”, investors will find it more difficult to dispose of the Company’s securities. Further, for companies whose securities are traded in the over-the-counter market, it is more difficult to obtain accurate quotations and to obtain coverage for significant news events because major wire services, such as the Dow Jones News Service, generally do not publish press releases about such companies.

 

NO DIVIDENDS

The Company has not paid any dividends on its common stock to date and there are no plans for paying dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable future. The Company intends to retain earnings, if any, to provide funds for the execution of its business plan. The Company does not intend to declare or pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. Therefore, there can be no assurance that holders of common stock will receive any additional cash, stock or other dividends on their shares of common stock until the Company has funds, which our board of directors determines can be allocated to dividends.

INTERNAL POLITICAL RISKS

Changes in laws and regulations, or their interpretation, or the imposition of confiscatory taxation, restrictions on currency conversion, imports and sources of supply, devaluations of currency or the nationalization or other expropriation of private enterprises could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. Under its current leadership, the Chinese government has been pursuing economic reform policies that encourage private economic activity and greater economic decentralization. There is no assurance, however, that the Chinese government will continue to pursue these policies, or that it will not significantly alter these policies from time to time without notice. In addition, the Chinese government could enact laws which restrict or prohibit the Company from conducting its surety and loan guarantees.

RISKS RELATED TO LIMITATIONS ON THE LIABILITY OF OUR DIRECTORS TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS

Our articles of incorporation provide, as permitted by governing Nevada law, that our directors shall not be personally liable to our stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, with certain exceptions. Our bylaws require us to provide mandatory indemnification of directors to the fullest extent permitted by Nevada law, except for matters arising under the securities laws of the United States. Further, we may elect to adopt forms of indemnification agreements to cover directors and officers. These provisions and agreements may discourage shareholders from bringing suit against a director for breach of fiduciary duty and may reduce the likelihood of derivative litigation brought by shareholders on behalf of us against a director.

 

 

RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH PAYMENT SECURITIES

To the extent the Company receives Payment Securities as payment for the performance of investment banking services, the financial status of the Company will be affected by the volatility of these securities for as long as they are held by the Company. You may lose money on your investment in the Company if the value of the Payment Securities declines. The risks affecting the value of the Payment Securities are described below:

 

MARKET RISK

Stock prices are volatile. Market risk refers to the risk that the value of Payment Securities in the Company’s portfolio may decline due to daily fluctuations in the securities markets generally. The Company’s financial performance will change periodically based on many factors that may generally affect the stock market, including fluctuation in interest rates, national and international economic conditions and general equity market conditions. In a declining stock market, stock prices for all companies (including those in the Company’s portfolio) may decline, regardless of their long-term prospects.

 

SMALL COMPANY RISK

The Company may hold Payment Securities of smaller companies. Stocks of smaller companies may have more risks than those of larger companies. In general, smaller companies have less experienced management teams, serve smaller markets, and find it more difficult to obtain financing for growth or potential development than larger companies. Due to these and other factors, small companies may be more susceptible to market downturns, and their stock prices may be more volatile than those of larger companies.

BUSINESS AND SECTOR RISK

From time to time, a particular set of circumstances may affect a particular industry or certain companies within an industry, while having little or no impact on other industries or other companies within the industry. For instance, economic or market factors; regulation or deregulation; and technological or other developments may negatively impact all companies in a particular industry. To the extent the Company invests heavily in a particular industry that experiences such a negative impact, the Company’s portfolio will be adversely affected.

INTEREST RATE RISK

Increases in interest rates typically lower the present value of a company’s future earnings stream. Since the market price of a stock changes continuously based upon investors’ collective perceptions of future earnings, stock prices will generally decline when investors anticipate or experience rising interest rates.

ISSUER RISK

The value of an individual security or particular type of security can be more volatile than the market as a whole and can perform differently from the value of the market as a whole.

WE DEPEND ON THE RELIABILITY OF OUR SERVICES.

 

As a member of the service industry, the Company is dependent upon the reliability of its consulting advice. There is no guarantee that the Company will be able to provide reliable services. Even though the Company is a unique niche services firm, there is no guarantee that other investment advisory firms will not copy or follow the Company’s unique services. If a competitor starts to copy our unique services, which is possible, management believes that it will face more intense competition than before.

  

WE DEPEND UPON KEY MEMBERS OF MANAGEMENT, THE LOSS OF ANY OF WHOM WOULD NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR BUSINESS.

 

The implementation of our business plan relies on key members of the management team and sales, marketing, and finance personnel. There is no guarantee that these employees will continue to work for the Company. In addition, there is no guarantee that the Company will be able to replace these employees with personnel of similar caliber should they not be able to work, or decide not to work for the Company.

 

 

WE HAVE A SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT OF $613,856 AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND HAVE RECEIVED AN OPINION FROM OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM REGARDING SUBSTANATIAL DOUBT ABOUT OUR ABILITY TO CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN.

 

We have history of operating losses. As of December 31, 2016, shareholders’ deficit is $613,856. These losses have resulted principally from expenses incurred for general and administrative, payroll and interest. 2011 is the first year we had profit. No assurances can be given as to whether we will continue to be profitable.

 

Our independent registered public accounting firm has added an explanatory paragraph to their report of independent registered public accounting firm issued in connection with the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 relative to the substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to obtain additional funding will determine our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

OUR BUSINESS AND GROWTH WILL SUFFER IF WE ARE UNABLE TO HIRE AND RETAIN KEY PERSONNEL THAT ARE IN HIGH DEMAND.

 

Our future success depends on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled personnel.  In general, qualified individuals are in high demand in China, and there are insufficient experienced personnel to fill the demand.  If we are unable to successfully attract or retain the personnel we need to succeed, we will be unable to implement our business plan.

 

WE HAVE LIMITED BUSINESS INSURANCE COVERAGE.

 

The insurance industry in China is still at an early stage of development. Insurance companies in China offer limited business insurance products, and do not, to our knowledge, offer business liability insurance. As a result, we do not have any business liability insurance coverage for our operations. Moreover, while business disruption insurance is available, we have determined that the risks of disruption and cost of the insurance are such that we do not require it at this time. Any business disruption, litigation or natural disaster might result in substantial costs and diversion of resources.

 

The Company’s executive offices in the United States are leased from one of its executives and located at 9436 Jacob Lane, Rosemead, CA 91770. Its telephone number is (310) 266-6890. The Company currently leases approximately 2,800 square feet of office space from a related party with $3,500 per month on month to month basis.

 

 

NONE

 

 

NONE

 

 

PART II

 

 

The Company’s common stock began trading on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (“OTC-BB”) on January 20, 2010 under the symbol “ASAE”.  As of April 14, 2017, there has been limited trading volume.  

 

HOLDERS OF RECORD

 

On December 31, 2016, the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock totaled 14,445,363 shares, held by approximately 150 shareholders of record and by indeterminate number of additional shareholders through nominee or street name accounts with brokers.

 

DIVIDENDS

 

The Company has not paid dividends in prior years and has no plans to pay dividends in the near future. The Company intends to reinvest its earnings on the continued development and operation of its business. Any payment of dividends would depend upon the Company’s pattern of growth, profitability, financial condition, and such other factors, as the Board of Directors may deem relevant.

 

PENNY STOCK

 

The Company’s securities are subject to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s “penny stock” rules. The penny stock rules may affect the ability of owners of the Company’s shares to sell them. There may be a limited market for penny stocks due to the regulatory burdens on broker-dealers. The market among dealers may not be active. Investments in penny stocks often are unable to sell stock back to the dealer that sold them the stock. The mark-ups or commissions charged by the broker-dealers might be greater than any profit an investor may make. Because of large spreads that market makers quote, investors may be unable to sell the stock immediately back to the dealer at the same price the dealer sold the stock to the investor.

 

The Company’s securities are also subject to the Securities and Exchange Commission rule that imposes special sales practice requirements upon broker-dealers that sell such securities to other than established customers or accredited investors. For purposes of the rule, the phrase “accredited investor” means, in general terms, institutions with assets exceeding $5,000,000 or individuals having net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or having an annual income that exceeds $200,000 (or that, combined with a spouse’s income, exceeds $300,000). For transactions covered by the rule, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction prior to the sale. Consequently, the rule may affect the ability of purchasers of the Company’s securities to buy or sell in any market.

 

SUBSEQUENT EVENT

 

None.

 

RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

 

None

 

 

 

The following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this annual report for the period ended December 31, 2016. This annual report contains certain forward-looking statements and the Company’s future operating results could differ materially from those discussed herein. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any obligation to update any such factors or to announce publicly the results of any revisions of the forward-looking statements contained or incorporated by reference herein to reflect future events or developments.

 

OVERVIEW

 

ASAP Expo’s (“ASAP” or “The Company” or “Our” or “We”) mission is to be the bridge between China and the Western world. ASAP is a company that assists Chinese institutional and high net worth individuals with acquisition advisory and asset management of U.S. hotels.

 

Our investors include AVIC International USA, Junson Capital, Urban Commons, Sky Harbor Management, Shenzhen New World, American Curvet, and USA Heritage.

 

From August 2010 until now, our group has provided consulting services regarding purchasing 20 hotels primarily in California, Florida, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, New Jersey and Michigan. Hotel brands include Marriott, Hilton, Westin, Doubletree by Hilton, Four Points by Sheraton, and Holiday Inn. We are one of the most active hotel buyers in the market.

ASAP believes we will continue this growth for the next couple of years, taking advantage of current below replacement cost assets with reasonable cap rates and value-added opportunities in the current U.S. hotel market.

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

Since the Company’s primary business is based upon potential transactions in real estate, the Company is subject to variances in revenues due to investors’ sentiment towards real estate.

 

Substantially all of our revenues are in the form of consulting fees collected from our clients, usually negotiated on a transaction-by-transaction basis. The Company’s consulting fees primarily consist of revenue derived from transaction commission received from acquisition advisory. The Company earns the consulting fees by sourcing the deal, underwriting financials, coordinating due diligence on all contracts, recommending lenders, hiring third party property management companies, and negotiating franchise agreements. Another revenue source for the Company includes asset management fees, which consist of supervision of daily, weekly, and monthly operating results of the hotel, review of capital expenditure requests, communication with lenders, negotiating personal and real property tax assessments, and most importantly, oversight on brand relations.

 

The Company’s clients include concentration of two to three main clients. Our concentration of clients does provide a risk for revenue growth. The Company has established strong relationships with our clients. Our business and client relationships, and our culture and philosophy are firmly centered on putting the clients’ interests first. We have been building strong reputation in the hospitality industry which is bringing several new potential clients. We expect to have steady revenue streams from our two major clients while building a new client base for future revenue growth. We believe that our deep knowledge of the hospitality industry, asset management services, client diversification, expertise in a property types and national sourcing deals platform have the potential to create a sustainable revenue stream within the U.S. commercial real estate sector.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company earned consulting fee of $1,715,522 including $1,267,072 from affiliated companies, as compared to consulting fee of $2,119,332 for the same period last year of which $1,076,118 were from affiliated companies. The decrease in consulting fee in 2016 was mainly because the Company closed two hotel acquisition deals versus three in year 2015. 

 

Cost of Sales 

In the course of providing real estate advisory services and asset management services, the Company pays consulting fees for finding properties and other services that facilitate the closing of deals.  

 

Cost of sales consisting mainly consulting expense, is primarily the result of the commissions and other incentive compensation incurred directly related to acquisition advisory services. Therefore, the fluctuation in revenue may directly impact the cost of sales.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company incurred consulting expenses of $817,297 for providing advisory services in real estate acquisition as compared to $1,157,757 incurred in the same period last year. The lower consulting expenses were mainly because the Company closed fewer hotel acquisition deals, and accordingly incurred lower consulting expenses related to the acquisition.

 

 

General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses consist primarily of administrative personnel costs, facilities expenses, and professional fee expenses.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2016, G&A expenses increased by $176,676 or 29.1% to $784,778 as compared to $608,102 for the same period last year. The increase was mainly due to higher marketing expense for new hotel deals, higher payroll and related employee benefits as one officer and one new staff were added to the payroll, higher staff expenses and a new auto lease, partly offset by lower professional fees.

 

 

Interest expense was largely flat at $22,128 during the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to $21,243 for the same period last year.

 

 

The Company recorded a net income of $57,858 for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to a net income of $260,480 for the same period last year. The decrease in net income was mainly due to the lower gross profit and higher G&A expenses, offset by lower income taxes provision.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

During the next twelve months, ASAP Expo will focus on its real estate transactions to generate additional revenue. With the net revenue from its services, and continuing support from its major shareholders to provide a note payable, management believes ASAP Expo will have enough net working capital to sustain its business for another 12 months.

 

The forecast of the period of time through which ASAP Expo’s financial resources will be adequate to support its operations is a forward-looking statement that involves risks and uncertainties. ASAP Expo’s actual funding requirements may differ materially as a result of a number of factors, including unknown expenses associated with the cost of providing real estate advisory, investment banking, and management consulting services.

The Report of the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on our December 31, 2016 financial statements includes an explanatory paragraph stating that the Company has negative working capital  and has not generated enough revenues to cover its operating expenses, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Our working capital for the periods presented is summarized as follows:

The following table shows cash flows for the periods presented:

Operating Activities

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, net cash used in operating activities was $57,775. This was primarily due to a net income of $57,858, adjusted by non-cash related expenses of depreciation of $10,474, then decreased by unfavorable changes in working capital of $126,107. The unfavorable changes in working capital resulted from a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $107,986 and decrease in income tax payable of $18,121.

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, net cash provided by operating activities was $261,607. This was primarily due to a net income of $260,480, adjusted by non-cash related expenses of depreciation of $8,038, then increased by unfavorable changes in working capital of $6,911. The unfavorable changes in working capital mainly resulted from a decrease in income tax payable of $60,903, offset by decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $53,992.

Investing Activities

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, net cash provided by investing activities was $84,040. This was primarily due to payment from affiliated companies of $87,695, offset by acquisition of a computer of $3,655.

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, net cash used in investing activities was $124,986. This was primarily due to acquisitions of property and equipment of $27,542 and an advance to affiliated companies of $97,444.

Financing activities

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, net cash used in financing activities was $40,176 which was mainly resulted from net payment to note payable from officers of $30,000, offset by payments on auto loan of $4,905 and payments on equipment loan of $5,271.

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, net cash used in financing activities was $131,369 which was mainly resulted from repayment to affiliated company of $64,156, net payment to note payable from officers of $62,716 and payments on auto loan of $4,497.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the our financial statements and the accompanying notes. The amounts of assets and liabilities reported on our balance sheet and the amounts of revenues and expenses reported for each of our fiscal periods are affected by estimates and assumptions, which are used for, but not limited to, the accounting for revenue recognition, stock based compensation and the valuation of deferred taxes. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The following critical accounting policies are significantly affected by judgments, assumptions and estimates used in the preparation of the financial statements:

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605, “Revenue Recognition” outlines the basic criteria that must be met to recognize revenue and provide guidance for presentation of revenue and for disclosure related to revenue recognition policies in financial statements filed with Securities and Exchange Commission. Management believes the Company’s revenue recognition policies conform to ASC 605.   

 

Revenues are mainly consulting fees. The Consulting fees are recognized when work is complete and service has been provided.  Consulting fees subject to refund are recorded as deferred revenue until the project is completed and the fees are no longer refundable. 

Income Taxes

 

The Company accounts for income taxes under ASC 740, “Income Taxes.” Under ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Management provides a valuation allowance for significant deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that such asset will not be recovered.

 

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

 

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”. The accounting guidance requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be reported on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. The guidance is effective for the Company retrospectively beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this accounting guidance is not expected to have any material impact on the Company’s Statements of Financial Condition.

In November 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Updates ASU No. 2015-17, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” (“ASU 2015-17”). The FASB issued ASU 2015-17 as part of its ongoing Simplification Initiative, with the objective of reducing complexity in accounting standards. The amendments in ASU 2015-17 require entities that present a classified balance sheet to classify all deferred tax liabilities and assets as a noncurrent amount. This guidance does not change the offsetting requirements for deferred tax liabilities and assets, which results in the presentation of one amount on the balance sheet. Additionally, the amendments in this ASU align the deferred income tax presentation with the requirements in International Accounting Standards (IAS) 1, Presentation of Financial Statements.  The amendments in ASU 2015-17 are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is currently reviewing the provisions of this ASU 2015-17 to determine if there will be any impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Updates ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities arising from a lease for both financing and operating leases. ASU 2016-02 will also require new qualitative and quantitative disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently reviewing the provisions of this ASU 2016-02 to determine if there will be any impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ASU 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”. The objective of the simplification initiative is to identify, evaluate, and improve areas of US GAAP for which cost and complexity can be reduced while maintaining or improving the usefulness of the information provided to users of financial statements. The areas for simplification involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. Amendments related to the timing of when excess tax benefits are recognized, minimum statutory withholding requirements, forfeitures, and intrinsic value should be applied using a modified retrospective transition method by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the period in which the guidance is adopted. ASU 2016-09 will be effective for public companies for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is assessing the impact to its accounting practices and financial reporting procedures as a result of the issuance of this standard.

In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”. The updated guidance aims to reduce diversity in presentation and classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments by addressing eight specific cash flow issues including (1) Debt Prepayment or Debt Extinguishment Costs; (2) Settlement of Zero-Coupon Debt Instruments or Other Debt Instruments with Coupon Interest Rates That Are Insignificant in Relation to the Effective Interest Rate of the Borrowing; (3) Contingent Consideration Payments Made after a Business Combination; (4) Proceeds from the Settlement of Insurance Claims; (5) Proceeds from the Settlement of Corporate-Owned Life Insurance Policies, including Bank-Owned Life Insurance Policies; (6) Distributions Received from Equity Method Investees; (7) Beneficial Interests in Securitization Transactions and (8) Separately Identifiable Cash Flows and Application of the Predominance Principle. Among the afore-mentioned eight addressed cash flow issues, the category of “Separately Identifiable Cash Flows and Application of the Predominance Principle” requires a reporting entity to classify cash receipts and payments that have aspects of more than one class of cash flows first by applying specific guidance in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and, only in the absence of specific guidance, by determining each separately identifiable source or use within the cash receipts and cash payments on the basis of the nature of the underlying cash flows. In situations in which cash receipts and payments have aspects of more than one class of cash flows and cannot be separated by source or use, a reporting entity should classify such cash receipts and cash payments by referring to the predominant source or use of cash flows for the item. The updated guidance is effective from reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is assessing the impact to its accounting practices and financial reporting procedures as a result of the issuance of this standard.

 

As of December 31, 2016, there are no recently issued accounting standards not yet adopted that would have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

 

The Company’s audited Financial Statements are set forth beginning on page F-1 in this Form 10-K.

None

 

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), Mr. Frank S. Yuan, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act as of a date (the “Evaluation Date”) within 90 days prior to filing the Company’s December 31, 2016 Form 10-K. Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of December 31, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting management to the material information relating to us required to be included in our periodic filings with the SEC. Based on his most recent evaluation as of the Evaluation Date, our CEO and CFO has also concluded that there are no significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting, at the reasonable assurance level, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect our ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information, and such officer has identified no material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Controls and Procedures

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report. Based on this evaluation, our President and Chief Financial Officer concluded as of December 31, 2016 that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the information required to be disclosed in our reports filed with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Evaluation of and Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting. Our President and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO - 2013). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2016, our internal control over financial reporting is effective in providing reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.

 

There have been no changes in internal controls, or in factors that could materially affect internal controls, subsequent to the date that management completed their evaluation.

 

 

None.

 

PART III

 

 

The following are the directors and executive officers of the Company as of March 31, 2017.

 

Frank S. Yuan, Chairman, CEO and CFO since 2007

The following sets forth certain biographical information concerning director:

Frank Yuan - Combining decades of experience in the apparel, banking, real estate, insurance and computer industries, Frank Yuan has developed and started multiple new ventures in his 30 plus years as an immigrant in the United States. Before the Company, Mr. Yuan founded multi-million dollars of business in men’s apparel private label & wholesale company, a “Knights of Round Table” sportswear line, a “Uniform Code” sweater line, and men’s clothing retail store chain. Mr. Yuan also founded UNI-Fortune, a real-estate development company, and co-founded United National Bank, Evertrust Bank, Western Cities Title Insurance Company and Serv-American National Title Insurance. Mr. Yuan received a B.A. degree in economics from Fu-Jen Catholic University in Taiwan and a M.B.A. degree from Utah State University. Mr. Yuan was a director & CEO of C-ME since 1996 and ASAP Expo since 2005.

COMMITTEES

 

The Board of Directors does not have an audit committee or a compensation committee, due to the small size of the Board.  The Board of Directors also does not have an audit committee financial expert.

CODE OF ETHICS

 

The Company does not have formal written values and ethical standards, due to the small number of members of management.  

 

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

The following table sets forth the compensation we have paid to each executive officer and all executive officers as a group, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, annual compensation, including salary and bonuses paid by the Company to the Chief Executive Officer. No other executive officers received more than $150,000 during the fiscal years-ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. The Company does not currently have a long-term compensation plan and does not grant any long-term compensation to its executive officers or employees.

 

The table does not reflect certain personal benefits, which in the aggregate are less than ten percent of the named executive officer’s salary and bonus. No other compensation was granted for the periods ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

 

 

 

All outside directors are reimbursed for any reasonable expenses incurred in the course of fulfilling their duties as directors of the Company and do not receive any payroll.

 

 

None.

The Company has a revolving line of credit totaling $1,800,000 with Frank Yuan and certain members of his family. The line of credit bears interest at 6% per annum starting October 1, 2010, 10% prior to October 1, 2010 and is due upon demand, as amended. During fiscal 2016 and 2015, the Company incurred interest expense totaling $21,441 and $20,233 in connection with the Line. At December 31, 2016, the balance of the Line was $610,952.

Currently, the Company is leasing office space from its officer under a month by month basis. The lease provides for monthly lease payments of $3,500.

The son of the Company’s officer (“Son”) periodically receives salary from the Company for work performed. During 2016, The Son received a total salary of $180,000.

 

 

The following table sets forth the fees paid by the Company for professional services rendered for the audits of the annual financial statements and fees billed for other services rendered by its principal accountants:

 

 

 

The Audit Committee has sole authority to approve any audit and significant non-audit services to be performed by its independent accountants. Such approval is required prior to the related services being performed.

 

 

PART IV

 

1. Financial Statements

ASAP EXPO, INC.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

To the Board of Directors

ASAP Expo, Inc.

 

 

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of ASAP Expo Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company was not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. Our audits included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly December 31, 2015, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2015, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has had an accumulated deficit of $216,113 since inception. These conditions, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 1, which includes the raising of additional equity financing or merger with another entity. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

/s/ Anton & Chia LLP

Newport Beach, CA

April 17, 2017

 

 

ASAP EXPO, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

ASAP EXPO, INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

ASAP EXPO, INC.

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

ASAP EXPO, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

ASAP EXPO, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

ORGANIZATION

 

ASAP Expo, Inc. (“ASAP Expo” or the “Company”) d.b.a. ASAP International Holdings, was incorporated on April 10, 2007 under the laws of the State of Nevada.

 

ASAP Expo is a company that operates commercial real estate consulting for Chinese Institutions and high net worth individuals. Our mission is to be the bridge between China and the Western world.

 

ASAP Commercial Real Estate division advisory provides Chinese institutions and high net worth individuals with all real estate related services focusing on hospitality including acquisition advisory, financing, asset management, and strategic repositioning.

 

On the hospitality acquisition side, we represent buyers at all stages of the process, from advice on selection of brands, location, opportunity sourcing and due diligence to securing debt financing. Our clients have the advantage of our local market knowledge and contacts in capital markets around the globe, as well as our deep experience in real estate strategy and management.

 

Prior to July 2011, the investment banking services division was the core business of ASAP Expo. ASAP Expo helped small and medium sized businesses raise funds and promote business through capital markets.

 

In July 2011, ASAP Expo transitioned its core business to providing real estate advisory services from investment banking advisory services for Chinese companies.

 

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

 

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, cash on deposit with banks, and highly liquid debt investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. The Company has no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

GOING CONCERN

 

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.

 

At December 31, 2016, the Company had a stockholders’ deficit of $613,856 and a negative working capital of $48,827, which mainly resulted from the accumulated deficit of its former parent company that was transferred to the Company upon its spin-off from the parent company, and a lack of profitable operating history. The Company hopes to increase revenues from its real estate business and financial advisory services business. In the absence of significant increases in revenues, the Company intends to fund operations through additional debt and equity financing arrangements. The successful outcome of future activities cannot be determined at this time and there are no assurances that if achieved, the Company will have sufficient funds to execute its intended business plan or generate positive operating results.

 

The Company’s success is dependent upon numerous items, certain of which are the successful growth of revenues from its services and its ability to obtain new customers in order to achieve levels of revenues adequate to support the Company’s current and future cost structure, for which there is no assurance. Unanticipated problems, expenses, and delays are frequently encountered in establishing and maintaining profitable operations. These include, but are not limited to, competition, the need to develop customer support capabilities and market expertise, technical difficulties, market acceptance and sales and marketing. The failure of the Company to meet any of these conditions could have a materially adverse effect on the Company and may force the Company to reduce or curtail operations. No assurance can be given that the Company can achieve or maintain profitable operations.

 

The Company believes it will have adequate cash to sustain operations until it achieves sustained profitability. However, until the Company has a history of maintaining revenue levels sufficient to support its operations and repay its working capital deficit, the Company may require additional financing. Sources of financing could include capital infusions, additional equity financing or debt offerings. There can be no assurance that funding will be available on acceptable terms, if at all, or that such fund, if raised, would enable the Company to achieve or sustain profitable operations.

 

These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the classification of liabilities that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

 

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, prepaid expenses and other receivables, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and due to/from affiliated company.  The fair value of these financial instruments approximate their carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets due to the short term maturity of these instruments.

Fair Value Measurements

 

ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:

 

Level 1 - Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

 

Level 2 - Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

 

Level 3 - Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

 

The Company’s financial instruments consisted of cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, advances to due to or from affiliated companies, notes payable to officers.  The estimated fair value of cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, due to or from affiliated companies, and notes payable approximates its carrying amount due to the short maturity of these instruments.

 

USE OF ESTIMATES

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with the GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

REVENUE RECOGNITION

 

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605, Revenue Recognition which outlines the basic criteria that must be met to recognize revenue and provide guidance for presentation of revenue and for disclosure related to revenue recognition policies in financial statements filed with Securities and Exchange Commission. Management believes the Company’s revenue recognition policies conform to ASC 605. 

 

Revenues are mainly consulting fees. The consulting fees are recognized when work is complete.  Consulting fees from real estate advisory services that are subject to refund are recorded as deferred revenue until the project is completed and the fees are no longer refundable.

 

INCOME TAXES

 

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred income taxes are recognized for temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements, net of operating loss carry forwards and credits, by applying enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future years.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is not more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized.  Current income taxes are provided for in accordance with the laws of the relevant taxing authorities.

 

 

EARNINGS PER SHARE

 

A basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the year. Dilutive earnings per share include the effect of any potentially dilutive debt or equity under the treasury stock method, if including such instruments is dilutive.

 

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

 

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”. The accounting guidance requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be reported on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. The guidance is effective for the Company retrospectively beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this accounting guidance is not expected to have any material impact on the Company’s Statements of Financial Condition.

In November 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Updates ASU No. 2015-17, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” (“ASU 2015-17”). The FASB issued ASU 2015-17 as part of its ongoing Simplification Initiative, with the objective of reducing complexity in accounting standards. The amendments in ASU 2015-17 require entities that present a classified balance sheet to classify all deferred tax liabilities and assets as a noncurrent amount. This guidance does not change the offsetting requirements for deferred tax liabilities and assets, which results in the presentation of one amount on the balance sheet. Additionally, the amendments in this ASU align the deferred income tax presentation with the requirements in International Accounting Standards (IAS) 1, Presentation of Financial Statements.  The amendments in ASU 2015-17 are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is currently reviewing the provisions of this ASU 2015-17 to determine if there will be any impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Updates ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities arising from a lease for both financing and operating leases. ASU 2016-02 will also require new qualitative and quantitative disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently reviewing the provisions of this ASU 2016-02 to determine if there will be any impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ASU 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”. The objective of the simplification initiative is to identify, evaluate, and improve areas of US GAAP for which cost and complexity can be reduced while maintaining or improving the usefulness of the information provided to users of financial statements. The areas for simplification involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. Amendments related to the timing of when excess tax benefits are recognized, minimum statutory withholding requirements, forfeitures, and intrinsic value should be applied using a modified retrospective transition method by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the period in which the guidance is adopted. ASU 2016-09 will be effective for public companies for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is assessing the impact to its accounting practices and financial reporting procedures as a result of the issuance of this standard.

In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”. The updated guidance aims to reduce diversity in presentation and classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments by addressing eight specific cash flow issues including (1) Debt Prepayment or Debt Extinguishment Costs; (2) Settlement of Zero-Coupon Debt Instruments or Other Debt Instruments with Coupon Interest Rates That Are Insignificant in Relation to the Effective Interest Rate of the Borrowing; (3) Contingent Consideration Payments Made after a Business Combination; (4) Proceeds from the Settlement of Insurance Claims; (5) Proceeds from the Settlement of Corporate-Owned Life Insurance Policies, including Bank-Owned Life Insurance Policies; (6) Distributions Received from Equity Method Investees; (7) Beneficial Interests in Securitization Transactions and (8) Separately Identifiable Cash Flows and Application of the Predominance Principle. Among the afore-mentioned eight addressed cash flow issues, the category of “Separately Identifiable Cash Flows and Application of the Predominance Principle” requires a reporting entity to classify cash receipts and payments that have aspects of more than one class of cash flows first by applying specific guidance in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and, only in the absence of specific guidance, by determining each separately identifiable source or use within the cash receipts and cash payments on the basis of the nature of the underlying cash flows. In situations in which cash receipts and payments have aspects of more than one class of cash flows and cannot be separated by source or use, a reporting entity should classify such cash receipts and cash payments by referring to the predominant source or use of cash flows for the item. The updated guidance is effective from reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is assessing the impact to its accounting practices and financial reporting procedures as a result of the issuance of this standard.

As of December 31, 2016, there are no recently issued accounting standards not yet adopted that would have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

NOTE 2 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Equipment consists of the following:

For the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, depreciation expenses were $10,474 and $8,038, respectively.

NOTE 3 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

At December 31, 2016 and 2015, ASAP Expo was owed $29,608 and $117,303 from affiliated companies in which ASAP Expo’s officers are also owners and officers. The advance has no written note, is non-interest bearing and payable on demand to the Company and expected to be paid within one year.

For the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, consulting fees from affiliates were $1,267,072 and $1,443,032, respectively.

 

The Company has a revolving line of credit totaling $1,800,000 with Frank Yuan and certain members of his family. The line of credit bears interest at 6% per annum starting October 1, 2010, 10% prior to October 1, 2010 and is due upon demand, as amended. On December 31, 2014, the convertible note was amended to waive the right of conversion and will be used as a line of credit. During fiscal 2016 and 2015, the Company incurred interest expense totaling $21,441 and $20,233 in connection with the Line. The balance of the note payable as of December 31, 2016 was $610,952 including accrued interest of $312,750 which was transferred to the principal at December 31, 2016. The balance of the note payable as of December 31, 2015 was $327,085 and the accrued interest on the note was $291,309.

Currently, the Company is leasing office space from its officer under a month by month basis. The lease provides for monthly lease payments of $3,500.

The son of the Company’s officer (“Son”) periodically receives salary from the Company for works performed. During year 2016, The Son received a total salary of $180,000.

A brother of the Company’s officer (“Brother”) is receiving consulting fees from the Company for works performed. During year 2016, the Brother earned a total consulting fee of $72,000.

NOTE 4 – SETTLEMENT PAYABLE

Based upon the settlement agreement for a lawsuit settled and dismissed in June 2011, the Company has a $120,000 outstanding settlement balance to be paid $100,000 in October 2015 and $20,000 in October 2016. The Company paid $100,000 on October 7, 2015 and $20,000 on October 21, 2016. The Company was involved in the lawsuit by one of its former affiliates, ASAP Hotel.

 

NOTE 5 - AUTO LOAN

In June 2013, the Company entered into a zero down and 0% interest financing arrangement to acquire a vehicle. Future minimum payments and the obligations due under the auto loan are as follows:

 

NOTE 6 - EQUIPMENT LOAN

In September 2015, the Company installed a solar system on its leased office for $17,570 with a 30-year loan at 5.49% interest. Each payment date, the Company will pay at least the “Total Amount Due” that is displayed on the monthly bill. The Total Amount Due will be the sum of all past due amounts plus the “Current Monthly Payment” that will be displayed on the monthly bill. Current Monthly Payments will be calculated as follows: the amount of kWh produced for the preceding month by the system; multiplied by the applicable agreed Equivalent Rate per kWh. The “Equivalent Rate per kWh” is based upon 5 factors: 1) the loan balance (which includes any accrued interest); 2) the Loan Term; 3) the applicable APR; 4) the expected production of the system; and 5) 2.50 % kWh annual rate escalator. The expected production of the system is an estimate, the actual payments could be higher or lower depending on the actual production from the system. If there is a remaining balance at the end of the loan term, the outstanding balance can be refinanced for an additional 12 months or for a term that is required by law. Estimated future Current Monthly Payments are as follows:

NOTE 7 - INCOME TAXES

The income taxes provision for the year ended December 31, 2016 consists of current income taxes of $29,524 and over-accrued federal taxes from 2015 of $2,194.

 

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets at December 31, 2016 and 2015 are presented below:

 

 

The reconciliation of federal statutory income tax rate to the Company’s effective income tax rate is as follows:

 

 

Interest associated with unrecognized tax benefits is classified as income tax and penalties are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the statements of operations and comprehensive income.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties expenses. Currently, the Company is not under examination by major tax jurisdictions.

NOTE 8 - SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

 

Common Stock

 

At December 31, 2016, the Company had 45,000,000 shares of common stock authorized and 14,445,363 shares issued and outstanding at par value $0.001 per share. No shares were issued during the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

 

NOTE 9 - COMMITMENT

 

Starting January 1, 2014, the Company leased office space from its officer under a month by month basis. The lease provides for monthly lease payments of $3,500.

 

NOTE 10 – CONCENTRATION

 

For the year ended December 31, 2016, four customers accounted for 88.4% (29.7%,, 26.1% 22.2%, and 10.4%) of the Company’s consulting fee income, three of which is an affiliate of the Company.  For the year ended December 31, 2015, three customers accounted for 82.5% (23.6%,, 17.3% and 41.6%) of the Company’s consulting fee income, one of which is an affiliate of the Company. The loss of any of these customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position and results of operations

NOTE 11 – SUBSEQUENT EVENT

The Company has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and disclosure through the date the financial statements were issued. 

 

2. Exhibits

EXHIBIT INDEX

  

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.