Attached files

file filename
8-K - CURRENT REPORT - SLM Student Loan Trust 2004-2sl20170406-8k_20042.htm
Exhibit 99.1
 
ANNEX A

The Trust Student Loan Pool as of February 28, 2017

The trust student loans owned by the trust were originally selected from a portfolio of consolidation student loans owned by Student Loan Marketing Association by employing several criteria, including requirements that each trust student loan as of the original statistical cutoff date (and with respect to each additional trust student loan as of its related subsequent cutoff date):
 
·
was guaranteed as to principal and interest by a guaranty agency under a guarantee agreement and the guaranty agency was, in turn, reinsured by the Department of Education in accordance with the FFELP;
 
·
contained terms in accordance with those required by the FFELP, the guarantee agreements and other applicable requirements;
 
·
was more than 30 days past the final disbursement;
 
·
was not more than 210 days past due;
 
·
did not have a borrower who was noted in the related records of the servicer as being currently involved in a bankruptcy proceeding; and
 
·
had special allowance payments, if any, based on the three-month commercial paper rate or the 91-day Treasury bill rate.

No trust student loan as of the applicable cutoff date was subject to any prior obligation to sell that loan to a third party.

Unless otherwise specified, all information with respect to the trust student loans is presented as of February 28, 2017, which is the statistical disclosure date.

The following tables provide a description of specified characteristics of the trust student loans as of the statistical disclosure date.  The aggregate outstanding principal balance of the loans in each of the following tables includes the principal balance due from borrowers, plus accrued interest of $2,391,393 to be capitalized as of the statistical disclosure date.  Percentages and dollar amounts in any table may not total 100% or whole dollars due to rounding.  The following tables also contain information concerning the total number of loans and total number of borrowers in the portfolio of trust student loans.  For ease of administration, the servicer separates a consolidation loan on its system into two separate loan segments representing subsidized and unsubsidized segments of the same loan.  The following tables reflect those loan segments within the number of loans.  In addition, 16 borrowers have more than one trust student loan.

The distribution by weighted average interest rate applicable to the trust student loans on any date following the statistical disclosure date may vary significantly from that in the following tables as a result of variations in the effective rates of interest applicable to the trust student loans and in rates of principal reduction.  Moreover, the information below about the weighted average remaining term to maturity of the trust student loans as of the statistical disclosure date may vary significantly from the actual term to maturity of any of the trust student loans as a result of prepayments or the granting of deferment and forbearance periods.
 
2004-2
A-1


The following tables also contain information concerning the total number of loans and the total number of borrowers in the portfolio of initial trust student loans.
 
Percentages and dollar amounts in any table may not total 100% of the initial trust student loan balance, as applicable, due to rounding.

COMPOSITION OF THE TRUST STUDENT LOANS AS OF
THE STATISTICAL DISCLOSURE DATE
 
Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance 
 
$
1,002,634,278
 
Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance – Treasury Bill 
 
$
101,980,639
 
Percentage of Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance – Treasury Bill
   
10.17
%
Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance – One-Month LIBOR 
 
$
900,653,638
 
Percentage of Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance – One-Month LIBOR
   
89.83
%
Number of Borrowers 
   
36,725
 
Average Outstanding Principal Balance Per Borrower 
 
$
27,301
 
Number of Loans 
   
63,656
 
Average Outstanding Principal Balance Per Loan – Treasury Bill 
 
$
26,703
 
Average Outstanding Principal Balance Per Loan – One-Month LIBOR
 
$
15,052
 
Weighted Average Remaining Term to Scheduled Maturity 
 
183 months
 
Weighted Average Annual Interest Rate 
   
4.78
%

We determined the weighted average remaining term to maturity shown in the table from the statistical disclosure date to the stated maturity date of the applicable trust student loan without giving effect to any deferment or forbearance periods that may be granted in the future.  See Appendix A to the preliminary remarketing memorandum.

The weighted average annual borrower interest rate shown in the table is exclusive of special allowance payments.  The weighted average spread for special allowance payments to the 91-day Treasury bill rate was 3.13% as of the statistical disclosure date.

The weighted average spread for special allowance payments to the one-month LIBOR rate was 2.64% as of the statistical disclosure date.  See “Special Allowance Payments” in Appendix A to the preliminary remarketing memorandum.

For these purposes, the 91-day Treasury bill rate is the weighted average per annum discount rate, expressed on a bond equivalent basis and applied on a daily basis, for direct obligations of the United States with a maturity of thirteen weeks, as reported by the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
2004-2
A-2


DISTRIBUTION OF THE TRUST STUDENT LOANS
BY BORROWER INTEREST RATES AS OF THE STATISTICAL
DISCLOSURE DATE
 
Interest Rates
 
Number
of Loans
   
Aggregate
Outstanding
Principal Balance
   
Percent of Pool
by Outstanding
Principal Balance
 
Less than or equal to 3.00% 
   
10,563
   
$
153,904,263
     
15.3
%
3.01% to 3.50% 
   
11,801
     
158,416,876
     
15.8
 
3.51% to 4.00% 
   
10,476
     
158,302,287
     
15.8
 
4.01% to 4.50% 
   
13,751
     
180,245,026
     
18.0
 
4.51% to 5.00% 
   
4,623
     
69,002,215
     
6.9
 
5.01% to 5.50% 
   
1,148
     
22,142,933
     
2.2
 
5.51% to 6.00% 
   
1,168
     
22,445,092
     
2.2
 
6.01% to 6.50% 
   
1,566
     
29,774,197
     
3.0
 
6.51% to 7.00% 
   
2,276
     
41,658,213
     
4.2
 
7.01% to 7.50% 
   
741
     
17,411,800
     
1.7
 
7.51% to 8.00% 
   
1,912
     
45,377,518
     
4.5
 
8.01% to 8.50% 
   
1,871
     
46,428,747
     
4.6
 
Equal to or greater than 8.51% 
   
1,760
     
57,525,112
     
5.7
 
                         
Total
   
63,656
   
$
1,002,634,278
     
100.0
%
 
We determined the interest rates shown in the table above using the interest rates applicable to the trust student loans as of the statistical disclosure date.  Because trust student loans with different interest rates are likely to be repaid at different rates, this information is not likely to remain applicable to the trust student loans after the statistical disclosure date.  See Appendix A to the preliminary remarketing memorandum and “The Student Loan Pools – The Student Loan Marketing Association’s Student Loan Financing Business” in the prospectus.
2004-2
A-3

DISTRIBUTION OF THE TRUST STUDENT LOANS BY
OUTSTANDING PRINCIPAL BALANCE PER BORROWER
AS OF THE STATISTICAL DISCLOSURE DATE
Range of Outstanding
Principal Balance
   
Number of
Borrowers
   
Aggregate
Outstanding
Principal Balance
   
Percent of Pool
by Outstanding
Principal Balance
 
Less than $5,000.00
     
7,417
   
$
16,576,829
     
1.7
%
$5,000.00-$ 9,999.99
     
5,990
     
45,691,480
     
4.6
 
$10,000.00-$14,999.99
     
5,007
     
61,369,322
     
6.1
 
$15,000.00-$19,999.99
     
3,136
     
54,557,457
     
5.4
 
$20,000.00-$24,999.99
     
2,660
     
59,628,702
     
5.9
 
$25,000.00-$29,999.99
     
2,090
     
57,202,839
     
5.7
 
$30,000.00-$34,999.99
     
1,521
     
49,342,925
     
4.9
 
$35,000.00-$39,999.99
     
1,274
     
47,720,923
     
4.8
 
$40,000.00-$44,999.99
     
1,061
     
45,000,125
     
4.5
 
$45,000.00-$49,999.99
     
893
     
42,366,510
     
4.2
 
$50,000.00-$54,999.99
     
750
     
39,290,708
     
3.9
 
$55,000.00-$59,999.99
     
638
     
36,733,411
     
3.7
 
$60,000.00-$64,999.99
     
506
     
31,607,409
     
3.2
 
$65,000.00-$69,999.99
     
431
     
29,083,524
     
2.9
 
$70,000.00-$74,999.99
     
388
     
28,115,404
     
2.8
 
$75,000.00-$79,999.99
     
363
     
28,113,163
     
2.8
 
$80,000.00-$84,999.99
     
281
     
23,164,705
     
2.3
 
$85,000.00-$89,999.99
     
230
     
20,107,737
     
2.0
 
$90,000.00-$94,999.99
     
221
     
20,416,422
     
2.0
 
$95,000.00-$99,999.99
     
200
     
19,462,528
     
1.9
 
$100,000.00 and above
     
1,668
     
247,082,154
     
24.6
 
                             
Total
     
36,725
   
$
1,002,634,278
     
100.0
%

 
DISTRIBUTION OF THE TRUST STUDENT LOANS
BY DELINQUENCY STATUS AS OF THE
STATISTICAL DISCLOSURE DATE
 
 
 
Number of Days Delinquent
 
Number
of Loans
   
Aggregate
Outstanding
Principal Balance
   
Percent of Pool
by Outstanding
Principal Balance
 
0-30 days 
   
60,922
   
$
940,891,707
     
93.8
%
31-60 days 
   
1,049
     
20,449,178
     
2.0
 
61-90 days 
   
491
     
12,508,749
     
1.2
 
91-120 days 
   
300
     
7,026,696
     
0.7
 
121-150 days 
   
191
     
4,439,885
     
0.4
 
151-180 days 
   
171
     
3,792,967
     
0.4
 
181-210 days 
   
130
     
3,874,950
     
0.4
 
 
2004-2
A-4

 
Greater than 210 days 
   
402
     
9,650,145
     
1.0
 
                         
Total
   
63,656
   
$
1,002,634,278
     
100.0
%


2004-2
A-5

DISTRIBUTION OF THE TRUST STUDENT LOANS
BY REMAINING TERM TO SCHEDULED MATURITY
AS OF THE STATISTICAL DISCLOSURE DATE
Number of Months
Remaining to
Scheduled Maturity
 
Number
of Loans
   
Aggregate
Outstanding
Principal Balance
   
Percent of Pool
by Outstanding
Principal Balance
 
0 to 3  
   
135
   
$
64,545
     
*
 
4 to12  
   
661
     
695,486
     
0.1
%
13 to 24 
   
5,371
     
6,597,356
     
0.7
 
25 to 36 
   
2,785
     
7,691,159
     
0.8
 
37 to 48 
   
2,302
     
10,033,834
     
1.0
 
49 to 60 
   
2,208
     
12,001,425
     
1.2
 
61 to 72 
   
2,923
     
17,627,025
     
1.8
 
73 to 84 
   
7,556
     
45,922,628
     
4.6
 
85 to 96 
   
3,681
     
28,865,991
     
2.9
 
97 to 108 
   
2,703
     
26,875,483
     
2.7
 
109 to 120 
   
2,372
     
27,994,713
     
2.8
 
121 to 132 
   
4,297
     
75,082,784
     
7.5
 
133 to 144 
   
5,833
     
93,200,337
     
9.3
 
145 to 156 
   
3,018
     
56,651,030
     
5.7
 
157 to 168 
   
1,956
     
40,312,985
     
4.0
 
169 to 180 
   
1,471
     
33,693,890
     
3.4
 
181 to 192 
   
1,548
     
36,904,331
     
3.7
 
193 to 204 
   
4,076
     
108,014,540
     
10.8
 
205 to 216 
   
1,914
     
57,446,126
     
5.7
 
217 to 228 
   
1,345
     
47,048,847
     
4.7
 
229 to 240 
   
1,454
     
57,006,472
     
5.7
 
241 to 252 
   
977
     
41,203,309
     
4.1
 
253 to 264 
   
749
     
36,472,634
     
3.6
 
265 to 276 
   
666
     
33,815,643
     
3.4
 
277 to 288 
   
457
     
23,596,939
     
2.4
 
289 to 300 
   
385
     
20,480,792
     
2.0
 
301 to 312 
   
330
     
21,666,346
     
2.2
 
313 to 324 
   
110
     
7,722,977
     
0.8
 
325 to 336 
   
76
     
5,511,637
     
0.5
 
337 to 348 
   
73
     
5,003,108
     
0.5
 
349 to 360 
   
139
     
10,291,339
     
1.0
 
361 and above 
   
85
     
7,138,568
     
0.7
 
                         
Total
   
63,656
   
$
1,002,634,278
     
100.0
%

*     Represents a percentage greater than 0% but less than 0.05%.

We have determined the number of months remaining to scheduled maturity shown in the table from the statistical disclosure date to the stated maturity date of the applicable trust student loan without giving effect to any deferment or forbearance periods that may be granted in the future. 
2004-2
A-6


See Appendix A to the preliminary remarketing memorandum and “The Student Loan Pools – The Student Loan Marketing Association’s Student Loan Financing Business” in the prospectus.

2004-2
A-7

DISTRIBUTION OF THE TRUST STUDENT LOANS
BY CURRENT BORROWER PAYMENT STATUS
AS OF THE STATISTICAL DISCLOSURE DATE
 
 
Current Borrower Payment Status
 
Number
of Loans
   
Aggregate
Outstanding
Principal Balance
   
Percent of Pool
by Outstanding
Principal Balance
 
Deferment 
   
2,206
   
$
41,831,721
     
4.2
%
Forbearance 
   
3,153
     
75,305,139
     
7.5
 
Repayment
                       
First year in repayment 
   
695
     
25,365,334
     
2.5
 
Second year in repayment 
   
722
     
27,224,098
     
2.7
 
Third year in repayment 
   
871
     
26,765,027
     
2.7
 
More than 3 years in repayment
   
56,009
     
806,142,958
     
80.4
 
                         
Total
   
63,656
   
$
1,002,634,278
     
100.0
%


Current borrower payment status refers to the status of the borrower of each trust student loan as of the statistical disclosure date.  The borrower:

·
may have temporarily ceased repaying the loan through a deferment or a forbearance period; or

·
may be currently required to repay the loan – repayment.
 
See Appendix A to the preliminary remarketing memorandum and “The Student Loan Pools – The Student Loan Marketing Association’s Student Loan Financing Business” in the prospectus.
 
The weighted average number of months in repayment for all trust student loans currently in repayment is approximately 113.8 calculated as the term to maturity at the commencement of repayment less the number of months remaining to scheduled maturity as of the statistical disclosure date.
2004-2
A-8

SCHEDULED WEIGHTED AVERAGE REMAINING MONTHS IN
STATUS OF THE TRUST STUDENT LOANS BY
CURRENT BORROWER PAYMENT STATUS AS OF THE
STATISTICAL DISCLOSURE DATE

 
Scheduled Months in Status Remaining
Current Borrower Payment Status
Deferment
Forbearance
Repayment
Deferment 
17.8
-
209.1
Forbearance 
-
4.2
203.9
Repayment 
-
-
178.7
       

We have determined the scheduled weighted average remaining months in status shown in the previous table without giving effect to any deferment or forbearance periods that may be granted in the future.  Of the $41,831,721 aggregate outstanding principal balance of the trust student loans in deferment as of the statistical disclosure date, $27,798,582 or approximately 66.5% of such loans are to borrowers who had not graduated as of that date.  We expect that a significant portion of these loans could qualify for additional deferments or forbearances at the end of their current deferment periods as the related borrowers continue their education beyond their current degree programs.  As a result, the overall duration of any applicable deferment and forbearance periods as well as the likelihood of future deferment and forbearance periods within this pool of trust student loans is likely to be higher than in other pools of student loans without similar numbers of in-school consolidation loans.  See Appendix A to the preliminary remarketing memorandum.

2004-2
A-9

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF THE TRUST STUDENT LOANS
AS OF THE STATISTICAL DISCLOSURE DATE
 
 
 
State
 
Number
of Loans
   
Aggregate
Outstanding
Principal Balance
   
Percent of Pool
by Outstanding
Principal Balance
 
Alabama 
   
306
   
$
5,463,883
     
0.5
%
Alaska 
   
105
     
1,789,429
     
0.2
 
Arizona 
   
1,327
     
24,986,064
     
2.5
 
Arkansas 
   
200
     
3,213,085
     
0.3
 
California 
   
6,786
     
120,077,183
     
12.0
 
Colorado 
   
1,188
     
19,808,971
     
2.0
 
Connecticut 
   
788
     
10,251,113
     
1.0
 
Delaware 
   
121
     
2,424,416
     
0.2
 
District of Columbia 
   
261
     
4,292,954
     
0.4
 
Florida 
   
9,598
     
132,042,973
     
13.2
 
Georgia 
   
1,631
     
27,581,324
     
2.8
 
Hawaii 
   
233
     
4,138,100
     
0.4
 
Idaho  
   
236
     
3,557,707
     
0.4
 
Illinois 
   
1,855
     
25,609,311
     
2.6
 
Indiana 
   
1,248
     
17,645,459
     
1.8
 
Iowa  
   
374
     
4,476,809
     
0.4
 
Kansas 
   
1,164
     
16,727,182
     
1.7
 
Kentucky 
   
353
     
5,014,330
     
0.5
 
Louisiana 
   
1,026
     
18,309,884
     
1.8
 
Maine  
   
131
     
1,821,838
     
0.2
 
Maryland 
   
1,285
     
22,698,310
     
2.3
 
Massachusetts 
   
1,717
     
21,496,810
     
2.1
 
Michigan 
   
1,032
     
17,977,688
     
1.8
 
Minnesota 
   
1,018
     
15,167,508
     
1.5
 
Mississippi 
   
262
     
5,193,037
     
0.5
 
Missouri 
   
1,433
     
21,460,783
     
2.1
 
Montana 
   
144
     
2,664,029
     
0.3
 
Nebraska 
   
184
     
2,611,408
     
0.3
 
Nevada 
   
404
     
6,904,917
     
0.7
 
New Hampshire 
   
258
     
3,551,545
     
0.4
 
New Jersey 
   
1,540
     
22,883,928
     
2.3
 
New Mexico 
   
218
     
3,440,570
     
0.3
 
New York 
   
4,106
     
59,197,815
     
5.9
 
North Carolina 
   
1,273
     
19,315,202
     
1.9
 
North Dakota 
   
52
     
791,695
     
0.1
 
Ohio  
   
5,111
     
91,221,656
     
9.1
 
Oklahoma 
   
752
     
12,253,335
     
1.2
 
Oregon 
   
1,025
     
17,730,017
     
1.8
 
Pennsylvania 
   
1,514
     
23,236,653
     
2.3
 
Rhode Island 
   
127
     
2,144,551
     
0.2
 
South Carolina 
   
446
     
8,045,424
     
0.8
 
South Dakota 
   
63
     
1,068,951
     
0.1
 
Tennessee 
   
766
     
14,591,487
     
1.5
 
Texas  
   
4,374
     
69,651,133
     
6.9
 
 
2004-2
A-10

 
Utah  
   
267
     
6,124,293
     
0.6
 
Vermont 
   
96
     
1,302,921
     
0.1
 
Virginia 
   
1,600
     
23,566,265
     
2.4
 
Washington 
   
2,387
     
36,195,785
     
3.6
 
West Virginia 
   
203
     
2,893,347
     
0.3
 
Wisconsin 
   
494
     
6,880,573
     
0.7
 
Wyoming 
   
53
     
694,669
     
0.1
 
Other  
   
521
     
10,445,952
     
1.0
 
                         
Total
   
63,656
   
$
1,002,634,278
     
100.0
%

2004-2
A-11

We have based the geographic distribution shown in the table on the billing addresses of the borrowers of the trust student loans shown on the servicer’s records as of the statistical disclosure date.

Each of the trust student loans provides or will provide for the amortization of its outstanding principal balance over a series of regular payments.  Except as described below, each regular payment consists of an installment of interest which is calculated on the basis of the outstanding principal balance of the trust student loan.  The amount received is applied first to interest accrued to the date of payment and the balance of the payment, if any, is applied to reduce the unpaid principal balance.  Accordingly, if a borrower pays a regular installment before its scheduled due date, the portion of the payment allocable to interest for the period since the preceding payment was made will be less than it would have been had the payment been made as scheduled, and the portion of the payment applied to reduce the unpaid principal balance will be correspondingly greater.  Conversely, if a borrower pays a monthly installment after its scheduled due date, the portion of the payment allocable to interest for the period since the preceding payment was made will be greater than it would have been had the payment been made as scheduled, and the portion of the payment applied to reduce the unpaid principal balance will be correspondingly less.

In either case, subject to any applicable deferment periods or forbearance periods, and except as provided below, the borrower pays a regular installment until the final scheduled payment date, at which time the amount of the final installment is increased or decreased as necessary to repay the then outstanding principal balance of that trust student loan.

The servicer makes available to borrowers of student loans it holds (including the trust student loans) payment terms that may result in the lengthening of the remaining term of the student loans.  For example, not all of the loans sold to the trust provide for level payments throughout the repayment term of the loans.  Some student loans provide for interest only payments to be made for a designated portion of the term of the loans, with amortization of the principal of the loans occurring only when payments increase in the latter stage of the term of the loans.  Other loans provide for a graduated phase in of the amortization of principal with a greater portion of principal amortization being required in the latter stages than would be the case if amortization were on a level payment basis.  The servicer also offers an income-sensitive repayment plan, under which repayments are based on the borrower’s income.  Under that plan, ultimate repayment may be delayed up to five years.  Borrowers under trust student loans will continue to be eligible for the graduated payment and income-sensitive repayment plans.  These programs are applicable to the trust student loans and may be offered by the servicer to related borrowers at its discretion.
2004-2
A-12


The following table provides certain information about trust student loans subject to the repayment terms described in the preceding paragraphs.
 
DISTRIBUTION OF THE TRUST STUDENT LOANS BY REPAYMENT
TERMS AS OF THE STATISTICAL DISCLOSURE DATE

 
 
Loan Repayment Terms
 
Number
of Loans
   
Aggregate
Outstanding
Principal Balance
   
Percent of Pool
by Outstanding
 Principal Balance
 
Level Repayment 
   
34,990
   
$
425,946,068
     
42.5
%
Other Repayment Options(1) 
   
24,364
     
445,955,260
     
44.5
 
Income-driven Repayment(2) 
   
4,302
     
130,732,949
     
13.0
 
                         
Total
   
63,656
   
$
1,002,634,278
     
100.0
%
 
(1)  Includes, among others, graduated repayment and interest-only period loans.
 
(2) Includes income sensitive and income based repayment.
 
 

With respect to interest-only loans, as of the statistical disclosure date, there are 794 loans with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $27,502,493 currently in an interest-only period.  These interest-only loans represent approximately 2.7% of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the trust student loans.  Interest-only periods range up to 48 months in overall length.

The servicer may in the future offer repayment terms similar to those described above to borrowers of trust student loans who are not entitled to these repayment terms as of the statistical disclosure date.  If repayment terms are offered to and accepted by those borrowers, the weighted average life of the securities could be lengthened.

DISTRIBUTION OF THE TRUST STUDENT LOANS BY LOAN
TYPE AS OF THE STATISTICAL DISCLOSURE DATE
 
Loan Type
 
Number
of Loans
   
Aggregate
Outstanding
Principal Balance
   
Percent of Pool
by Outstanding
Principal Balance
 
Subsidized 
   
31,469
   
$
423,497,321
     
42.2
%
Unsubsidized
   
32,187
     
579,136,957
     
57.8
 
                         
Total
   
63,656
   
$
1,002,634,278
     
100.0
%


2004-2
A-13


The following table provides information about the trust student loans regarding date of disbursement.

DISTRIBUTION OF THE TRUST STUDENT LOANS
BY DATE OF DISBURSEMENT AS OF
THE STATISTICAL DISCLOSURE DATE
 
 
 
Disbursement Date
 
Number
of Loans
   
Aggregate
Outstanding
Principal Balance
   
Percent of Pool
by Outstanding
Principal Balance
 
September 30, 1993 and earlier 
   
964
   
$
28,573,474
     
2.8
%
October 1, 1993 through June 30, 2006
   
62,692
     
974,060,804
     
97.2
 
July 1, 2006 and later 
   
0
     
0
     
0.0
 
                         
Total
   
63,656
   
$
1,002,634,278
     
100.0
%
 


2004-2
A-14



Guaranty Agencies for the Trust Student Loans.  The eligible lender trustee has entered into a separate guarantee agreement with each of the guaranty agencies listed below, under which each of the guarantors has agreed to serve as guarantor for specified trust student loans.

The following table provides information with respect to the portion of the trust student loans guaranteed by each guarantor.

 
DISTRIBUTION OF THE TRUST STUDENT LOANS
BY GUARANTY AGENCY AS OF
THE STATISTICAL DISCLOSURE DATE
 
 
 
Name of Guaranty Agency
 
Number
of Loans
   
Aggregate
Outstanding
Principal Balance
   
Percent of Pool
by Outstanding
Principal Balance
 
American Student Assistance 
   
2,041
   
$
22,061,764
     
2.2
%
College Assist 
   
44
     
816,448
     
0.1
 
Educational Credit Management Corporation
   
1,472
     
26,198,437
     
2.6
 
Florida Off Of Student Fin'l Assistance 
   
10,817
     
130,239,509
     
13.0
 
Great Lakes Higher Education Corporation 
   
1,146
     
22,102,618
     
2.2
 
Illinois Student Assistance Comm 
   
1,536
     
19,751,917
     
2.0
 
Kentucky Higher Educ. Asst. Auth. 
   
256
     
3,276,171
     
0.3
 
Lousiana Office Of Student Financial Asst 
   
351
     
5,173,625
     
0.5
 
Michigan Guaranty Agency 
   
677
     
8,645,685
     
0.9
 
Montana Guaranteed Student Ln Prog 
   
1
     
19,701
     
*
 
Nebraska National Student Loan Program 
   
12
     
244,644
     
*
 
New Jersey Higher Ed Student Assistance Authority
   
3,189
     
38,775,890
     
3.9
 
New York State Higher Ed Services Corp 
   
6,893
     
91,549,015
     
9.1
 
Northwest Education Loan Association 
   
4,629
     
60,544,260
     
6.0
 
Oklahoma Guaranteed Stud Loan Prog 
   
547
     
7,949,746
     
0.8
 
Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency
   
4,459
     
64,132,161
     
6.4
 
Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corp 
   
3,965
     
60,612,612
     
6.0
 
United Student Aid Funds, Inc. 
   
21,621
     
440,540,075
     
43.9
 
Total 
   
63,656
   
$
1,002,634,278
     
100.0
%
                         

*     Represents a percentage greater than 0% but less than 0.05%.

2004-2
A-15

 
SIGNIFICANT GUARANTOR INFORMATION
 

The information shown for the Significant Guarantors relates to all student loans, including but not limited to initial trust student loans, guaranteed by the Significant Guarantors.

We obtained the following information from various sources, including from the related Significant Guarantor and/or from the Department of Education. None of the depositor, the sellers, the servicer, their affiliates or the remarketing agents has audited or independently verified this information for accuracy or completeness.

UNITED STUDENT AID FUNDS, INC.

United Student Aid Funds, Inc. (“USA Funds”) was organized as a private, nonprofit corporation under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware in 1960.  In accordance with its Certificate of Incorporation, USA Funds: (i) maintains facilities for the provision of guarantee services with respect to approved education loans made to or for the benefit of eligible students attending approved educational institutions; (ii) guaranteed education loans made pursuant to certain loan programs under the Higher Education Act, as well as loans made under certain private loan programs; and (iii) serves as the designated guarantor for education-loan programs under the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (“the Act”) in Arizona, Hawaii and certain Pacific Islands, Indiana, Kansas, Maryland, Mississippi, Nevada and Wyoming.

USA Funds contracts with Navient Solutions, LLC and Student Assistance Corporation. Student Assistance Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of Navient Solutions, LLC Navient Solutions, LLC and its subsidiaries are not sponsored by nor are they agencies of the United States of America.

USA Funds is the sole member of the Northwest Education Loan Association, a guarantor serving the states of Washington, Idaho and the Northwest.  USA Funds, Inc. became a member of Great Lakes Higher Education Corporation effective January 1, 2017.

For the purpose of providing loan guarantees under the Act, USA Funds has entered into various agreements (collectively, the “Federal Reinsurance Agreements”) with the U.S. Secretary of Education (the “Secretary”). Pursuant to the Federal Reinsurance Agreements, USA Funds serves as a “guaranty agency” as defined in Section 435(j) of the Act. The Act allows the Secretary, after giving the guaranty agency notice and the opportunity for a hearing, to terminate the Federal Reinsurance Agreements if the Secretary determines that the administrative or financial condition of the guaranty agency jeopardizes the agency’s continued ability to perform its responsibilities under its guaranty agreement, it is necessary to protect the federal financial interest, or to ensure the continued availability of loans to student- or parent- borrowers.
 
Reinsurance is paid to USA Funds by the Secretary in accordance with a formula based on the annual default rate of loans guaranteed by USA Funds under the Act and the disbursement date of loans. The rate of reinsurance ranges from 100 percent to 75 percent of USA Funds’ losses on default-claim payments made to lenders. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2016 provided for 100 percent reinsurance on all FFEL Program claims purchased beginning December 2015 and beyond.  Prior to that, the Higher Education Amendments of 1998 (the “1998 Reauthorization Law”) reduced the reinsurance coverage for loans in default made on or after Oct. 1, 1998, to a range from 95 percent to 75 percent based upon the annual default claims rate of the guaranty agency. Reinsurance on non-default claims remains at 100 percent.
 
The 1998 Reauthorization Law requires guaranty agencies to establish two (2) separate funds, a federal reserve fund (property of the United States) and an agency operating fund (property of the guaranty agency).
2004-2
A-16

The federal reserve fund is to be used to pay lender claims and to pay a default-aversion fee to the agency operating fund. The agency operating fund is to be used by the guaranty agency to pay its operating expenses.

On March 30, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-152), which ended the origination and guarantee of new loans under the Federal Family Education Loan Program, effective for loans whose first disbursement was after June 30, 2010. As a result of the statute, USA Funds will continue to administer a portfolio of outstanding FFELP loans, but no longer may guarantee new federal student loans.

As of September 30, 2016, USA Funds held net assets on behalf of the federal reserve fund of approximately $143 million. Through September 30, 2016, the outstanding, unpaid, aggregate amount of principal and interest on loans that had been directly guaranteed by USA Funds under the Federal Family Education Loan Program was approximately $46.6 billion.  Also, as of September 30, 2016, USA Funds had operating fund assets totaling over $1.1 billion, which includes the $146 million of net assets held on behalf of the Federal Reserve Fund.

USA Funds’ “reserve ratio” complies with the U.S. Department of Education definition, which is determined by dividing the fund balance reserves in a guarantor’s federal reserve fund, by the total amount of loans outstanding. Following this formula, the reserve ratio for the federal reserve fund administered by USA Funds for the last five fiscal years was as follows:
 
   
Reserve Ratio
   
Federal Fiscal Year
Guarantor
 
2012
 
2013
 
2014
 
2015
 
2016
United Student Aid Funds, Inc. 
 
0.354%
 
0.313%
 
0.277%
 
0.251%
 
0.308%

USA Funds’ “recovery rate,” which provides a measure of the effectiveness of the collection efforts against defaulted borrowers after the guarantee claim has been satisfied, is determined by dividing the amount recovered from borrowers by USA Funds during the fiscal year by the aggregate amount of default claims paid by USA Funds outstanding at the end of the prior fiscal year. For the last five fiscal years, the “recovery rate” was as follows:
 
   
Recovery Ratio
   
Federal Fiscal Year
Guarantor
 
2012
 
2013
 
2014
 
2015
 
2016
United Student Aid Funds, Inc. 
 
31.82%
 
30.55%
 
32.01%
 
34.93%
 
29.94%
 
 
USA Funds’ “loss rate” represents the percentage of claims purchased from lenders but not covered by reinsurance. For the last five fiscal years, the “loss rate” was as follows:
 
   
Loss Rate
   
Federal Fiscal Year
Guarantor
 
2012
 
2013
 
2014
 
2015
 
2016
United Student Aid Funds, Inc. 
 
4.73%
 
4.74%
 
4.73%
 
4.71%
 
0.94%
 
In addition, USA Funds’ “claims rate” represents the percentage of federal reinsurance claims paid by the Secretary during any fiscal year, less amounts remitted to the Secretary for defaulted loans that are rehabilitated relative to USA Funds’ existing portfolio of loans in repayment at the end of the prior fiscal year. For the last five fiscal years, the “claims rate” was as follows:
2004-2
A-17

 
   
Claims Rate
   
Federal Fiscal Year
Guarantor
 
2012
 
2013
 
2014
 
2015
 
2016
United Student Aid Funds, Inc. 
 
1.58%
 
1.41%
 
1.48%
 
0.60%
 
01.58%
 

 
FLORIDA OFFICE OF STUDENT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE

The Department of Education (Department), Office of Student Financial Assistance (OSFA), administers the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) that provides low-cost educational loans to assist students and their parents in paying for the cost of higher education.  OSFA is the designated guaranty agency for the State of Florida, for all loans with first disbursement prior to July 1, 2010, and utilizes the FFELP System, a mainframe-based student loan information system administered by the Northwest Regional Data Center (NWRDC).  The FFELP System, in the past, based on specified criteria, determined whether an educational loan will be guaranteed and, if guaranteed, maintained information relating to the loan.

The Department established OSFA pursuant to Section 1001.20(4)(d), Florida Statutes.  By law, OSFA is responsible for providing access to and administering State and Federal grants, scholarships, and loans to those students seeking financial assistance for postsecondary study pursuant to program criteria and eligibility requirements.

FFELP provided and manages low-cost educational loans authorized by the Higher Education Act to assist students and their parents in paying for the cost of higher education.  Prior to July, 2010, through FFELP, private lenders made federally guaranteed student loans to parents and students.  Commercial lenders (e.g., Navient) used their private capital to finance loans under FFELP but received subsidies from the Federal Government.  Upon approval of the application, a FFELP loan was made to the student (borrower) by a participating financial institution.  To protect the financial institution from loss in the event of the borrower’s death, disability, or default, the loan was guaranteed by a guarantor.

Nonprofit and state guaranty agencies were established to guarantee student loans made by lenders under FFELP.  The Department, through the business users within OSFA’s program office, served as the State of Florida guaranty agency for FFELP and provided certain administrative and oversight functions, while the United States Department of Education provided reinsurance to the guaranty agency.

Beginning July 1, 2010, all new student loans were made under the Direct Loan Program whereby the Federal Government lends directly to students.  OSFA continues to use the FFELP System to manage and maintain information related to all FFELP loans with first disbursements prior to July 1, 2010, and provide customer service to schools, lenders, and borrowers through default prevention, collections, and dissemination of information.

The FFELP System resides on a mainframe computer located at the Northwest Regional Data Center (NWRDC).  The Department uses, among other things, mainframe security software to control access to the FFELP System, including application programs and data files.

As of September 30, 2014, OSFA held net assets on behalf of the Federal Reserve Fund of approximately $19,861,865. Through September, 30, 2014, the outstanding, unpaid, aggregate amount of principal and interest on loans that had been directly guaranteed by OSFA under the Federal Family Education Loan Program was approximately $1,651,811,788. Also, as of September 30, 2014, OSFA had Operating Fund assets totaling almost $41,463,446.
2004-2
A-18


OSFA’s “reserve ratio” complies with the U.S. Department of Education definition, which is determined by dividing the fund balance reserves in a guarantor’s Federal  Reserve Fund by the total amount of loans outstanding.  Following this formula, the reserve ratio for the Federal Reserve Fund administered by OSFA for the last five fiscal years was as follows:
 
 Fiscal Year 
 Reserve Ratio
2014
2013
2012
2011
1.20%
1.07%
1.02%
0.99%
2010
0.92%

OSFA’s “recovery rate,” which provides a measure of the effectiveness of the collection efforts against defaulted borrowers after the guarantee claim has been satisfied, is determined by dividing the amount recovered from borrowers by OSFA during the fiscal year by the aggregate amount of default claims paid by OSFA outstanding at the end of the prior fiscal year. For the last five fiscal years, the “recovery rate” was as follows:

 Fiscal Year 
 Recovery Rate 
2014
2013
2012
2011
19.98%
18.36%
18.99%
20.70%
2010
24.71%

In addition, OSFA’s “trigger rate” represents the percentage of federal reinsurance claims paid by the Secretary during any fiscal year, less amounts remitted to the Secretary for defaulted loans that are rehabilitated relative to OSFA’s existing portfolio of loans in repayment at the end of the prior fiscal year. For the last five fiscal years, the “trigger rate” was as follows:

 Fiscal Year 
 Trigger Rate
2014
2013
2012
2011
2.74%
4.48%
4.24%
4.50%
2010
4.43%

OSFA is located in Tallahassee, Florida.  OSFA will provide a copy of its most recent financial statement upon receipt of a written request directed to Levis Hughes, Chief at 325 W. Gaines St, Suite 1314, Tallahassee, FL  32399.
 
 
2004-2
A-19