Attached files

file filename
EX-32 - EXHIBIT 32 - Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, Inc.a10q_070316ex32.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, Inc.a10q_070316ex312.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, Inc.a10q_070316ex311.htm
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý
 
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended July 3, 2016
 
OR
 
 
 
o
 
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
 
 
For the transition period from                    to                  
Commission file number 1-10582
ORBITAL ATK, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
41-1672694
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
45101 Warp Drive
 
 
Dulles, Virginia
 
20166
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (703) 406-5000



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o    No ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o    No ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer ý
 
Accelerated Filer o
 
Non-Accelerated Filer o
 (Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o    No ý
As of March 27, 2017, there were 57,670,971 shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding.
 




TABLE OF CONTENTS




PART I— FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ORBITAL ATK, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(unaudited)
 
Quarters Ended
 
Six Months Ended
(Amounts in thousands except per share data)
July 3, 2016
 
July 5, 2015
 
July 3, 2016
 
July 5, 2015
 
 
 
As Restated (1)
 
 
 
 
Sales
$
1,083,345

 
$
1,103,578

 
$
2,139,740

 
$
2,074,728

Cost of sales
803,533

 
880,717

 
1,633,093

 
1,628,594

Gross profit
279,812

 
222,861

 
506,647

 
446,134

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Research and development
35,752

 
24,664

 
55,531

 
50,032

Selling
26,993

 
32,504

 
54,041

 
53,412

General and administrative
69,522

 
64,150

 
129,051

 
203,238

Goodwill impairment

 

 

 
34,300

Income from continuing operations, before interest, income taxes and noncontrolling interest
147,545

 
101,543

 
268,024

 
105,152

    Net interest expense
(16,267
)
 
(15,784
)
 
(33,579
)
 
(36,535
)
    Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

 
(26,626
)
Income from continuing operations, before income taxes and noncontrolling interest
131,278

 
85,759

 
234,445

 
41,991

    Income taxes
40,690

 
27,806

 
66,584

 
23,583

Income from continuing operations, before noncontrolling interest
90,588

 
57,953

 
167,861

 
18,408

    Less net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest
(185
)
 
117

 
(176
)
 
(75
)
Income from continuing operations of Orbital ATK, Inc.
90,773

 
57,836

 
168,037

 
18,483

Discontinued operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from discontinued operations, before income taxes

 

 

 
17,504

Income taxes

 

 

 
667

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

 
16,837

Net income attributable to Orbital ATK, Inc.
$
90,773

 
$
57,836

 
$
168,037

 
$
35,320

Basic earnings per common share from:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Continuing operations
$
1.56

 
$
0.98

 
$
2.88

 
$
0.35

Discontinued operations

 

 

 
0.31

Net income attributable to Orbital ATK, Inc.
$
1.56

 
$
0.98

 
$
2.88

 
$
0.66

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
58,189

 
59,144

 
58,270

 
53,572

Diluted earnings per common share from:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Continuing operations
$
1.55

 
$
0.97

 
$
2.86

 
$
0.34

Discontinued operations

 

 

 
0.31

Net income attributable to Orbital ATK, Inc.
$
1.55

 
$
0.97

 
$
2.86

 
$
0.65

Weighted-average number of diluted common shares outstanding
58,636

 
59,749

 
58,803

 
54,141

Cash dividends per common share
$
0.30

 
$
0.26

 
$
0.60

 
$
0.58

Comprehensive income (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to Orbital ATK, Inc. and noncontrolling interest
$
90,588

 
$
57,953

 
$
167,861

 
$
35,245

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reclassification of prior service credits for pension and postretirement benefit plans recorded to net income, net of tax benefit of $2,482 and $2,691, $4,952 and $5,567, respectively
(3,959
)
 
(4,335
)
 
(7,931
)
 
(8,956
)
Reclassification of net actuarial loss (gain) for pension and postretirement benefit plans recorded to net income, net of tax (expense) benefit of $(12,468), $(14,610), $(24,432) and $11,951, respectively
19,875

 
23,536

 
39,107

 
(18,542
)
Valuation adjustment for pension and postretirement benefit plans, net of tax (expense) benefit of $(648), $0, $(648) and $139,583, respectively
1,025

 

 
1,025

 
(224,389
)
Change in fair value of derivatives, net of tax (expense) benefit of $(1,664), $361, $(1,534) and $(620), respectively
2,629

 
(571
)
 
2,425

 
964

Other, net of tax benefit (expense) of $463, $17, $(102) and $38, respectively
(460
)
 
(27
)
 
604

 
(64
)
Change in cumulative translation adjustment, net of tax (expense) of $(9,650)

 

 

 
(21,381
)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
19,110

 
18,603

 
35,230

 
(272,368
)
Comprehensive income (loss)
109,698

 
76,556

 
203,091

 
(237,123
)
Less comprehensive (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest
(185
)
 
117

 
(176
)
 
(75
)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Orbital ATK, Inc.
$
109,883

 
$
76,439

 
$
203,267

 
$
(237,048
)
(1) See Note 3 - Restatement
See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2


ORBITAL ATK, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share data)
 
July 3, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Current assets:
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
59,784

 
$
104,032

Net receivables
 
1,802,644

 
1,670,821

Net inventories
 
237,256

 
213,212

Income taxes receivable
 
13,446

 
50,769

Other current assets
 
67,167

 
89,645

Total current assets
 
2,180,297

 
2,128,479

Net property, plant and equipment
 
757,769

 
761,694

Goodwill and net intangibles
 
1,951,454

 
1,975,522

Other noncurrent assets
 
428,008

 
458,000

Total assets
 
$
5,317,528

 
$
5,323,695

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
 
 
 
Current liabilities:
 
 
 
 
Current portion of long-term debt
 
$
40,000

 
$
40,000

Accounts payable
 
137,192

 
130,812

Accrued compensation
 
95,614

 
127,928

Contract loss reserve
 
207,046

 
235,841

Other current liabilities
 
642,105

 
719,854

Total current liabilities
 
1,121,957

 
1,254,435

Long-term debt
 
1,467,125

 
1,435,836

Pension and other postretirement benefits
 
780,742

 
820,834

Other noncurrent liabilities
 
132,773

 
127,152

Total liabilities
 
3,502,597

 
3,638,257

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 13 and 16)
 

 

Common stock—$.01 par value: authorized—180,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding— 58,399,226 shares at July 3, 2016 and 58,729,995 shares at December 31, 2015
 
584

 
587

Additional paid-in-capital
 
2,179,470

 
2,187,940

Retained earnings
 
1,175,948

 
1,043,043

Accumulated other comprehensive loss
 
(750,653
)
 
(785,908
)
Common stock in treasury, at cost—10,535,798 shares held at July 3, 2016 and 10,205,029 shares held at December 31, 2015
 
(801,046
)
 
(771,029
)
Total Orbital ATK, Inc. stockholders' equity
 
1,804,303

 
1,674,633

Noncontrolling interest
 
10,628

 
10,805

Total equity
 
1,814,931

 
1,685,438

Total liabilities and equity
 
$
5,317,528

 
$
5,323,695


See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3


ORBITAL ATK, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
 
 
Six Months Ended
(Amounts in thousands)
 
July 3, 2016
 
July 5, 2015
Operating Activities
 
 
 
 
Continuing operations:
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
$
167,861

 
$
35,245

Net loss from discontinued operations
 

 
(16,837
)
Income from continuing operations
 
167,861

 
18,408

Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations:
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
80,156

 
74,661

Amortization of deferred financing costs
 
1,288

 
2,291

Fixed asset impairment
 
3,641

 
12,538

Deferred income taxes
 
7,358

 
(31,449
)
Goodwill impairment
 

 
34,300

Loss on the extinguishment of debt
 

 
26,626

Stock-based plans expense
 
11,198

 
22,323

Other
 
302

 
(1,641
)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
Net receivables
 
(129,996
)
 
34,578

Net inventories
 
(26,762
)
 
29,685

Income taxes receivable
 
37,323

 
37,369

Accounts payable
 
8,953

 
(22,130
)
Contract loss reserve
 
(28,273
)
 
(26,625
)
Accrued compensation
 
(29,078
)
 
(35,202
)
Pension and other postretirement benefits
 
12,237

 
7,766

Other assets and liabilities
 
(46,098
)
 
(48,115
)
Cash flows provided by operating activities of continuing operations
 
70,110

 
135,383

Cash flows provided by operating activities of discontinued operations
 

 
10,741

Cash flows provided by operating activities
 
70,110

 
146,124

Investing Activities
 
 
 
 
Continuing operations:
 
 
 
 
Capital expenditures
 
(60,562
)
 
(77,523
)
Cash acquired in Merger with Orbital
 

 
253,734

Cash dividend received from Vista Outdoor, net of cash transferred to Vista Outdoor in conjunction with the Distribution of Sporting Group
 

 
188,878

Other
 

 
138

Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities of continuing operations
 
(60,562
)
 
365,227

Cash flows provided by investing activities of discontinued operations
 

 
49

Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities
 
(60,562
)
 
365,276

Financing Activities
 
 
 
 
Borrowings on revolving credit facilities
 
440,000

 
468,000

Payments on revolving credit facilities
 
(390,000
)
 
(568,000
)
Payment of long-term debt
 
(20,000
)
 
(44,998
)
Payments made to extinguish debt
 

 
(372,758
)
Purchase of treasury shares
 
(49,140
)
 
(32,289
)
Dividends paid
 
(35,136
)
 
(25,869
)
Other
 
480

 
2,529

Cash flows used in financing activities
 
(53,796
)
 
(573,385
)
Effect of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on cash
 

 
(1,340
)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
 
(44,248
)
 
(63,325
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
 
104,032

 
112,920

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
 
$
59,784

 
$
49,595

 
 
 
 
 

4


Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures
 
 
 
 
Noncash investing and operating activity:
 
 
 
 
Capital expenditures included in accounts payable
 
$
2,414

 
$
5,014

Noncash financing and operating activity:
 
 
 
 
Treasury shares purchased included in accounts payable
 
$
1,028

 
$

See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5


NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
1. Basis of Presentation and Responsibility for Interim Financial Statements
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Orbital ATK, Inc. ("the Company" or "Orbital ATK") as set forth in this quarterly report have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") for interim reporting. As permitted under those rules, certain footnotes and other financial information that are normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States can be condensed or omitted. The Company’s accounting policies are described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements in the Company's Amended Transition Report on Form 10-K/A ("Form 10-K/A") for the nine-month transition period ended December 31, 2015 filed on February 24, 2017 with the SEC. Management is responsible for the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this document. The condensed consolidated financial statements included in this document are unaudited but, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s financial position as of July 3, 2016, its results of operations for the quarter and six months ended July 3, 2016 and July 5, 2015 and cash flows for the six months ended July 3, 2016 and July 5, 2015. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015 was derived from the audited financial statements included in the Form 10-K/A but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("U.S. GAAP") for complete financial statements.
On February 9, 2015, the Company completed a tax-free spin-off of and distribution of its former Sporting Group to its stockholders (the "Distribution") as a new public company called Vista Outdoor Inc. ("Vista Outdoor"). Immediately following the Distribution, the Company combined with Orbital Sciences Corporation ("Orbital") through the merger of a Company subsidiary with Orbital (the "Merger"). These transactions are discussed in greater detail in Note 5. Following the Distribution and Merger, the Company changed its name from Alliant Techsystems Inc. to Orbital ATK, Inc.
As a result of the Distribution, Sporting Group is no longer reported within the Company’s results from continuing operations but is reported as a discontinued operation for all prior periods presented. The Company used the acquisition method to account for the Merger; accordingly, the results of Orbital have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements since the date of the Merger.
Following the Distribution and Merger, the Company reorganized its business groups and realigned its reporting segments. The Company’s remaining businesses, combined with the businesses of Orbital, are now reported in three segments: Flight Systems Group, Defense Systems Group and Space Systems Group, as discussed in Note 20. The business that composed Sporting Group is presented as a discontinued operation - see Note 5.
Sales, expenses, cash flows, assets and liabilities can and do vary during the year. Therefore, the results and trends in these interim financial statements may not be the same as those for the full year. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to current year presentation.
This Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes included in its Form 10-K/A.
Fiscal Year Change and the presentation of the Six Months Ended July 5, 2015. On March 10, 2015, the Company's Board of Directors approved a change in the Company's fiscal year end from March 31 to a calendar year ending on December 31 of each year. The Company's interim quarterly periods are based on 13-week periods and ending on the Sunday closest to the last calendar day of each of March, June and September. The Company filed a Transition Report on Form 10-K for the nine-month transition period ended December 31, 2015 on March 15, 2016, which was subsequently amended on February 24, 2017. Information in this document referring to the six months ended July 5, 2015, includes the Company's restated results for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and July 5, 2015 as disclosed in the Company's Form 10-K/A. Additionally, the restated results for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 were also reported in the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 2016 (filed with the SEC on April 3, 2017).

Restatement of Previously Issued Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. In this Form 10-Q, the Company has restated its unaudited condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the quarter ended July 5, 2015 as disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K/A.
2. New Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Updates Adopted
In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-09, Compensation--Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting,

6

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



which requires the recognition of the income tax effects of awards in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled, thus eliminating additional paid in capital pools. The guidance also allows for the employer to repurchase a greater number of an employee’s shares for tax withholding purposes without triggering liability accounting. In addition, the guidance allows for a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur rather than on an estimated basis. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 with early adoption permitted. The Company elected to early adopt this ASU in the quarter ended April 3, 2016. The adoption of this new standard did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-07, Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent), which removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient. Such investments should be disclosed separate from the fair value hierarchy. This ASU became effective retrospectively for the Company beginning in the quarter ended April 3, 2016. The adoption of this new standard did not have an impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements but impacted certain disclosures reflected in the notes to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, and in August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of- credit Arrangements. These ASUs more closely align the treatment of debt issuance costs with debt discounts and premiums and requires debt issuance costs to be presented as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt. The amendments in these ASUs became effective during the Company's first quarter ended April 3, 2016. The adoption of these new standards impacted the presentation of the current and prior period debt issuance costs included in Note 12.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis, which simplifies the consolidation evaluation process by placing more emphasis on risk of loss when determining a controlling financial interest. This new standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of this new standard did not have a material impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Standards Updates Issued But Not Yet Adopted
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which requires recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities for those leases classified as operating leases under previous generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("U.S. GAAP"). The new standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 with early adoption permitted. The Company currently is evaluating the potential changes from this ASU to its future financial reporting and disclosures.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which will replace numerous requirements in U.S. GAAP, including industry-specific requirements, and provide companies with a single revenue recognition model for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers. The core principle of the new standard is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Under the new standard, the Company expects to continue using the cost-to-cost percentage of completion method to recognize revenue for most of its long-term contracts. The two permitted transition methods under the new standard are the full retrospective method, in which case the standard would be applied to each prior reporting period presented, or the modified retrospective method, in which case the cumulative effect of applying the standard would be recognized at the date of initial application. The Company has not yet selected a transition method. In July 2015, the FASB approved the deferral of the new standard's effective date by one year. The new standard now will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The FASB will permit companies to adopt the new standard early, but not before the original effective date of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company currently is evaluating the potential changes from this ASU to its future financial reporting and disclosures.
Other new pronouncements issued but not effective for the Company until after July 3, 2016 are not expected to have a material impact on the Company's continuing financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

7

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



3. Restatement
In February 2017, the Company filed the Form 10-K/A to restate its consolidated financial statements for the nine-month transition period ended December 31, 2015 ("2015 transition period"), fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 ("fiscal 2015"), fiscal year ended March 31, 2014 ("fiscal 2014"), the quarters in the 2015 transition period and fiscal 2015 (the "Restatement") to correct errors primarily related to (i) the estimation of contract costs at completion on the long-term contract (the “Lake City Contract”) with the U.S. Army to manufacture and supply small caliber ammunition at the Lake City Army Ammunition Plant ("LCAAP") causing a forward loss provision to not be identified timely and recorded in prior periods; and (ii) correcting the Company’s accounting policy for measurement of forward loss provisions. In this Form 10-Q, the Company restated its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statement of comprehensive income for the quarter ended July 5, 2015 for the consequential impact of these errors.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, in consultation with senior management, determined that the Company should conduct an internal investigation, under its supervision, of the circumstances surrounding the misstatements in the accounting for the Lake City Contract and related matters. The investigation was undertaken by outside counsel, along with independent counsel for the Audit Committee. Counsel received assistance from outside forensic accountants. As disclosed in the Form 10-K/A, the investigation was previously completed.

Based on the internal investigation, the Audit Committee and senior management concluded as follows: Certain personnel at the Small Caliber Systems Division and, in some cases, Defense Systems Group, acted inappropriately and failed to adhere to the high standards established in the Company’s policies and expected by senior management and the Board of Directors. Specifically, with respect to the Lake City Contract: (a) there likely was a bias toward maintaining a targeted profit rate; (b) in some cases, there appears to have been inappropriate use of management reserves to maintain the targeted profit rate; (c) some members of the Small Caliber Systems Division finance staff failed to follow up and inquire further into indicators that cost overruns were occurring, and if such inquiries had been made, it could have led to further contemporaneous discussion and an earlier conclusion that the Lake City Contract was in a forward loss position; and (d) negative information was suppressed, and concerns at the Small Caliber Systems Division about cost overruns were not escalated appropriately to higher-level Company management or finance staff, nor were they communicated to the Audit Committee, the Board of Directors or the independent registered public accounting firms.

The Lake City Contract is within the Small Caliber Systems Division, a business unit within the Company’s Defense Systems Group, and is a fixed price contract accounted for under the percentage of completion revenue recognition method. The Lake City Contract was entered into in September 2012. It has an initial term of seven years plus the possibility of an award term extension of an additional three years if by July 17, 2017 the Company does not provide written notice of rejection to the U.S. Army. It is probable that the Company will provide written notice of rejection to the U.S. Army. As a result, the Restatement presents the total estimated forward loss provision for the initial seven-year term.

Management identified that the underlying contract costs estimated at completion for the Lake City Contract in prior periods contained misstatements which, when corrected, resulted in the Lake City Contract’s estimated costs at completion exceeding the contracted revenues. This necessitated a forward loss charge for the seven-year term of the Lake City Contract to be recorded for the entire anticipated forward loss on the contract in the period in which the loss became evident. The Company determined that $31,500 of the loss was evident at contract signing (second quarter of fiscal 2013) and $342,000 became evident at the time of initial production (second quarter of fiscal 2014) and restated those periods and the consequential impact in subsequent periods.
Due to the contract loss identified at the Lake City facility, the Company recognized an impairment charge for the long lived assets capitalized for the Lake City Ammunition Plant asset group in fiscal 2014. Subsequent to the impairments, costs incurred for the purchase or construction of additional long-lived assets related to this contract were expensed in the periods incurred, as such costs will not be recovered, and the depreciation expense recorded in subsequent periods was revised. The impairment charge recognized on long lived assets was $8,962 and $3,576 in the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and July 5, 2015, respectively.
The Company corrected its accounting policy from measurement of a forward loss provision based on gross profit to measurement based on gross profit along with general and administrative costs and adjusted the previously recorded forward loss provisions. The Company's prior accounting policy for measurement of a forward loss excluded general and administrative costs from the forward loss determination resulting in an incorrect measurement of a forward loss as these costs should be included in the measurement. The aggregate impact of this correction to the contract loss reserve liability, excluding the

8

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



adjustment for the Lake City Contract, was an increase of $3,707 at July 5, 2015. As part of the correction in accounting policy, the Company also reclassified certain forward loss provisions recorded in net receivables to the contract loss reserve liability.
In addition to the matters in (i) and (ii) described above, the Company also corrected for (iii) certain immaterial out of period adjustments previously recorded in the Transition Report on Form 10-K for the nine month period ending December 31, 2015 filed with the SEC on March 15, 2016 that related to misstatements in the application of purchase accounting with respect to acquired long-term contracts accounted for under the percentage of completion revenue recognition method and (iv) various other misstatements which are immaterial both individually and in the aggregate and which were identified during an account review and analysis exercise.
A summary of the impact of these matters on income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes and
noncontrolling interest is presented below:
 
 
Increase / (Decrease) Restatement Impact
 
 
Quarter ended
 July 5, 2015
Lake City Contract Loss and Related Adjustments:
 
 
Sales
 
$
(7,706
)
Cost of sales
 
$
(7,372
)
Gross profit
 
$
(334
)
Income before interest expense, income taxes and noncontrolling interest
 
$
(334
)
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest
 
$
(334
)
 
 

Contract Loss Reserve Adjustment:
 

Sales
 
$

Cost of sales
 
$
762

Gross profit
 
$
(762
)
Income before interest expense, income taxes and noncontrolling interest
 
$
(762
)
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest
 
$
(762
)
 
 

Account Review and Analysis and Other:
 

Sales
 
$
4,050

Cost of sales
 
$
954

Gross profit
 
$
3,096

General and administrative
 
$
(5,211
)
Income before interest expense, income taxes and noncontrolling interest
 
$
8,307

Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest
 
$
8,479

The restatement adjustments were tax effected and any tax adjustments reflected in the condensed consolidated financial statements relate entirely to the tax effect on the restatement adjustments.

9

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



The account balances labeled “As Reported” in the following table represents the amounts previously reported in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 5, 2015 filed on August 11, 2015 with the SEC. The columns labeled First Restatement Adjustments and Second Restatement Adjustments represent the restatement adjustments disclosed in the Transition Report on Form 10-K for the 2015 transition period previously filed with the SEC on March 15, 2016 and the restatement adjustments disclosed in the Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC in February 2017, respectively. The effects of these prior period errors on the condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the quarter ended July 5, 2015 were as follows:
 
 
Quarter Ended July 5, 2015
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
 
As Reported
 
First Restatement Adjustments
 
Second Restatement Adjustments
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sales
 
$
1,129,957

 
$
(22,723
)
 
$
(3,656
)
 
$
1,103,578

Cost of sales
 
875,532

 
10,841

 
(5,656
)
 
880,717

Gross profit
 
254,425

 
(33,564
)
 
2,000

 
222,861

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Research and development
 
24,664

 

 

 
24,664

Selling
 
32,504

 

 

 
32,504

General and administrative
 
71,463

 
(2,102
)
 
(5,211
)
 
64,150

Income before interest, income taxes and noncontrolling interest
 
125,794

 
(31,462
)
 
7,211

 
101,543

Interest expense, net
 
(15,361
)
 
(595
)
 
172

 
(15,784
)
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest
 
110,433

 
(32,057
)
 
7,383

 
85,759

Income taxes
 
37,563

 
(12,422
)
 
2,665

 
27,806

Net income before noncontrolling interest
 
72,870

 
(19,635
)
 
4,718

 
57,953

Less net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
117

 

 

 
117

Net income attributable to Orbital ATK, Inc.
 
$
72,753

 
$
(19,635
)
 
$
4,718

 
$
57,836

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings per common share from:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to Orbital ATK, Inc.
 
$
1.23

 
 
 
 
 
$
0.98

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
 
59,144

 
 
 
 
 
59,144

Diluted earnings per common share from:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to Orbital ATK, Inc.
 
$
1.22

 
 
 
 
 
$
0.97

Weighted-average number of diluted common shares outstanding
 
59,749

 
 
 
 
 
59,749

Comprehensive income attributable to Orbital ATK, Inc.
 
$
91,356

 
$
(19,635
)
 
$
4,718

 
$
76,439

4. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The current authoritative guidance on fair value clarifies the definition of fair value, prescribes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to measure fair value, and expands disclosures about the use of fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
The valuation techniques required by the current authoritative literature are based upon observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect internal market assumptions. These two types of inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:
Level 1—Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
Level 2—Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.
Level 3—Significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable.
The following section describes the valuation methodologies used by the Company to measure its financial instruments at fair value.

10

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



Derivative financial instruments and hedging activities—In order to manage its exposure to commodity pricing, foreign currency risk and interest rate risk on debt, the Company periodically utilizes commodity, foreign currency and interest rate derivatives, which are considered Level 2 instruments. As discussed further in Note 8, the Company has outstanding commodity forward contracts that were entered into to hedge forecasted purchases of copper and zinc, as well as outstanding foreign currency forward contracts that were entered into to hedge forecasted transactions denominated in a foreign currency. Commodity derivatives are valued based on prices of futures exchanges and recently reported transactions in the marketplace. The Company currently holds five interest rate swaps with a total notional value of $400,000. These swaps are valued based on future LIBOR rates and the established fixed rate is based primarily on quotes from banks. Foreign currency derivatives are valued based on observable market transactions of spot currency rates and forward currency prices.
The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, other than derivatives, which include net receivables, inventory, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other current assets and liabilities, are reasonable estimates of their related fair values. The fair value of the variable-rate long-term debt is calculated based on current market rates for debt of the same risk and maturities. The fair value of the fixed-rate debt is based on market quotes for each issuance. The Company considers these to be Level 2 instruments.
The Company’s non-financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis include goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets and long-lived tangible assets. The valuation methods used to determine fair value require a significant degree of management judgment to determine the key assumptions. As such, the Company generally classifies non-financial instruments as either Level 2 or Level 3 fair value measurements.
The following tables set forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Company's financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
 
 
July 3, 2016
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using Inputs Considered as
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives
 
$

 
$
3,577

 
$

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives
 
$

 
$
4,543

 
$


 
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using Inputs Considered as
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives
 
$

 
$
3,979

 
$

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives
 
$

 
$
8,353

 
$

Recorded carrying amount and fair value of debt was as follows:
 
 
July 3, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
Carrying Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying Amount
 
Fair Value
Fixed-rate debt
 
$
700,000

 
$
731,134

 
$
700,000

 
$
712,500

Variable-rate debt
 
$
820,000

 
$
815,552

 
$
790,000

 
$
787,697

Investments in marketable securities—The Company has investments in marketable securities held in a common collective trust ("CCT") that are primarily fixed income securities used to pay benefits under a nonqualified supplemental executive retirement plan for certain executives and highly compensated employees. Investments in a collective investment vehicle are valued by multiplying the investee company's net asset value per share with the number of units or shares owned at the valuation date as determined by the investee company. Net asset value per share is determined by the investee company's custodian or fund administrator by deducting from the value of the assets of the investee company all of its liabilities and

11

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



dividing the resulting number by the outstanding number of shares or units. Investments held by the CCT, including collateral invested for securities on loan, are valued on the basis of valuations furnished by a pricing service approved by the CCT's investment manager, which determines valuations using methods based on market transactions for comparable securities and various relationships between securities which are generally recognized by institutional traders, or at fair value as determined in good faith by the CCT's investment manager. The fair value of these securities, not subject to leveling, is included within other noncurrent assets on the Company's consolidated balance sheet. The fair value of these securities is measured on a recurring basis and was $11,448 and $12,065 as of July 3, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
5. Mergers, Acquisitions and Divestitures
On February 9, 2015, the Company completed the spin-off and Distribution of its former Sporting Group to its stockholders and merged with Orbital pursuant to a transaction agreement, dated April 28, 2014 (the "Transaction Agreement"). The Company completed the Merger with Orbital in order to create a global aerospace and defense company with greater technical and industrial capabilities and increased financial resources. Both the Distribution and Merger were structured to be tax-free to U.S. stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Under the Transaction Agreement, a subsidiary of the Company merged with and into Orbital, with Orbital continuing as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
Pursuant to the Distribution, Company stockholders received two shares of Vista Outdoor for each share of Company common stock held. The Company distributed a total of approximately 63.9 million shares of Vista Outdoor common stock to its stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 2, 2015 the record date for the Distribution. As a result of the Distribution, Sporting Group is no longer reported within the Company’s results from continuing operations but is reported as a discontinued operation for all prior periods presented in accordance with ASC Topic 205, "Presentation of Financial Statements." Sales reported as discontinued operations were $186,000 for the six months ended July 5, 2015.
In connection with the Merger, each outstanding share of Orbital common stock was converted into the right to receive 0.449 shares of Company common stock. The Company issued approximately 27.4 million shares of common stock to Orbital stockholders. Immediately following the Merger, Orbital stockholders owned 46.2% of the common stock of the Company and existing stockholders owned 53.8%. Based on the closing price of the Company's common stock following the Distribution on February 9, 2015 as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, the aggregate value of the consideration paid or payable to former holders of Orbital common stock was approximately $1,800,000. The Company used the acquisition method to account for the Merger; accordingly, the results of Orbital have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements since the date of the Merger.


12

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



Valuation of Net Assets Acquired
The following amounts represent the final determination (as of the Merger date) of the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Merger, including adjustments made to date during the one year measurement period from the date of the Merger:
Purchase Price:
 
 
Value of common shares issued to Orbital shareholders (1)
 
$
1,749,323

Value of replacement equity-based awards to holders of Orbital equity-based awards (2)
 
8,654

Total purchase price
 
$
1,757,977

 
 
 
Value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
 


Cash
 
$
253,734

Net receivables
 
558,639

Net inventories
 
75,294

Intangibles
 
173,000

Property, plant and equipment
 
277,438

Deferred tax assets, net
 
64,821

Other assets
 
36,878

Goodwill
 
826,548

Accounts payable
 
(52,028
)
Contract fair value liabilities
 
(130,888
)
Other liabilities
 
(325,459
)
Total purchase price
 
$
1,757,977

_________________________________________
(1) 
Equals 27.4 million Orbital ATK shares issued to Orbital shareholders multiplied by $63.94, the closing share price of the Company’s common stock on the closing date of the Merger.
(2) 
The fair value of replacement equity-based awards attributable to pre-Merger service was recorded as part of the consideration transferred in the Merger.
The consideration paid for Orbital's assets and liabilities was determined using the fair market value of the Company stock issued on the closing date of the Merger along with restricted stock awards granted to certain employees of Orbital.
Goodwill recognized from the Merger primarily relates to the expanded market opportunities, expected synergies and benefits of increased scale and scope of combined human, physical and financial resources attributable to merging the operations of the two companies. As stated above, the Merger was a tax-free transaction and as such, goodwill is not amortized for tax purposes.
In determining the fair values of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, a review was conducted for any significant contingent assets or liabilities existing as of the Merger date. There were no significant contingencies identified related to any legal or government action.
The accompanying condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the six months ended July 3, 2016 included a measurement period adjustment of $6,000 pertaining to the fair value of intangibles. All elements in the determination of the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Merger were completed during the quarter ended April 3, 2016.

13

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



Supplemental Pro Forma Data
The following unaudited supplemental pro forma data for the six months ended July 5, 2015 presents consolidated information as if the Merger had been completed on April 1, 2013. The pro forma results were calculated by combining the results from continuing operations of the Company with the stand-alone results of Orbital for the pre-Merger period, which were adjusted to eliminate historical sales between the companies and to account for certain costs which would have been incurred during this pre-Merger period:
 
 
Six Months Ended July 5, 2015
Sales
 
$
2,191,869

Income from continuing operations
 
$
28,790

Basic earnings per common share from continuing operations
 
$
0.48

Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations
 
$
0.48

The unaudited supplemental pro forma data above includes the following significant adjustments made to account for certain costs which would have been incurred if the Merger had been completed on April 1, 2013, as adjusted for the applicable income tax impact:
 
 
Six Months Ended July 5, 2015
Amortization of acquired Orbital intangible assets (1)
 
$
3,877

Interest expense adjustment (2)
 
$
(6,069
)
Transaction fees for advisory, legal and accounting services (3)
 
$
(19,134
)
_________________________________________
(1) Added the amortization of acquired Orbital intangible assets recognized at fair value in purchase accounting and eliminated historical Orbital intangible asset amortization expense.
(2) Reduced interest expense for the net reduction in debt of the Company and Orbital.
(3) Excluded transaction fees for advisory, legal and accounting services incurred in the six months ended July 5, 2015.
The unaudited supplemental pro forma data above does not reflect the potential realization of cost savings related to the integration of the two companies. Further, the pro forma data should not be considered indicative of the results that would have occurred if the Merger had been completed on April 1, 2013, nor are they indicative of future results.
Ongoing Business with Vista Outdoor
In conjunction with the Distribution, the Company entered into two supply agreements and one transition services agreement ("TSA") with Vista Outdoor. The supply agreements call for Vista Outdoor to purchase certain minimum quantities of ammunition and gun powder from the Company through March 2017 or 2018, as applicable. The supply agreements which are priced at arms-length expire in 2017 (powder) and 2018 (ammunition) and may be extended in one-to-three year increments. Under the terms of the TSA, the Company provided Vista Outdoor with administrative services for 12 months following the Distribution and will provide tax-related services through August 31, 2016. At the option of Vista Outdoor, the Company may provide tax-audit related services to Vista Outdoor through August 31, 2017. Fees for services under the TSA are charged to Vista Outdoor.
Sales to Vista Outdoor under the supply agreements were $44,443 and $109,111 for the quarter and six months ended July 3, 2016, respectively; and $57,439 and $76,367 for the quarter and period from the date of Distribution to July 5, 2015, respectively. Prior to the Merger, sales to Sporting Group, previously reported as intercompany sales and eliminated in consolidation were $13,595 for the six months ended July 5, 2015.

14

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



6. Goodwill and Net Intangibles
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment were as follows:
 
 
Flight Systems Group
 
Defense Systems Group
 
Space Systems Group
 
Total
Balance, December 31, 2015
 
$
922,991

 
$
363,247

 
$
542,128

 
$
1,828,366

  Measurement period adjustments
 
5,467

 

 
(1,822
)
 
3,645

Balance, July 3, 2016
 
$
928,458

 
$
363,247

 
$
540,306

 
$
1,832,011

Goodwill recorded within Defense Systems Group is presented net of accumulated impairment losses totaling $3,700 at July 3, 2016. Goodwill recorded within Space Systems Group is presented net of accumulated impairment losses totaling $142,800 at July 3, 2016.
Net intangibles consisted of the following:
 
 
July 3, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net Intangibles
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net Intangibles
Amortizing intangibles:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contract backlog
 
$
173,000

 
$
(57,783
)
 
$
115,217

 
$
179,000

 
$
(36,696
)
 
$
142,304

Patented technology
 
11,018

 
(6,792
)
 
4,226

 
11,018

 
(6,206
)
 
4,812

Customer relationships and other
 
1,905

 
(1,905
)
 

 
24,294

 
(24,254
)
 
40

Net intangibles
 
$
185,923

 
$
(66,480
)
 
$
119,443

 
$
214,312

 
$
(67,156
)
 
$
147,156

The contract backlog asset in the table above is being amortized as the underlying costs are recognized under the contracts. The other assets in the table above are being amortized using a straight-line method. Amortization expense related to net intangible assets was $10,863 and $21,713 for the quarter and six months ended July 3, 2016 and $13,023 and $19,965 for the quarter and six months ended July 5, 2015, respectively. The Company expects amortization expense related to these assets to be as follows:
 
 
Contract Backlog
 
Patents
 
Total
Remainder of 2016
 
$
21,086

 
$
595

 
$
21,681

2017
 
35,882

 
1,180

 
37,062

2018
 
25,609

 
1,120

 
26,729

2019
 
21,760

 
1,072

 
22,832

2020
 
10,880

 
259

 
11,139

Thereafter
 

 

 

Total
 
$
115,217

 
$
4,226

 
$
119,443



15

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



7. Earnings Per Share Data
Basic earnings per share ("EPS") is computed based upon the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for each period. Diluted EPS is computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and increased to include the dilutive effect of outstanding share-based equity awards for each period.
In computing basic and diluted EPS for both the quarter and six months ended July 3, 2016 and July 5, 2015, the reported earnings for each respective period were divided by the weighted-average shares outstanding, determined as follows (in thousands):
 
 
Quarter Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
 
July 3, 2016
 
July 5, 2015
 
July 3, 2016
 
July 5, 2015
Basic weighted-average number of shares outstanding
 
58,189

 
59,144

 
58,270

 
53,572

Dilutive common share equivalents- share-based equity awards
 
447

 
605

 
533

 
569

Diluted weighted-average number of shares outstanding
 
58,636

 
59,749

 
58,803

 
54,141

Anti-dilutive stock options excluded from the calculation of diluted shares
 
147

 
75

 
147

 
100

8. Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company is exposed to market risks arising from adverse changes in commodity prices affecting the cost of raw materials and energy, interest rates and foreign exchange risks. In the normal course of business, these risks are managed through a variety of strategies, including the use of derivative instruments. Commodity forward contracts are periodically used to hedge forecasted purchases of certain commodities, foreign currency exchange contracts are used to hedge forecasted transactions denominated in a foreign currency, and the Company periodically uses interest rate swaps to hedge forecasted interest payments and the risk associated with variable interest rates on long-term debt.
The Company entered into forward contracts for copper and zinc in 2016. The contracts establish a fixed price for the underlying commodity and are designated and qualify as effective cash flow hedges of purchases of the commodity. Ineffectiveness is calculated as the amount by which the change in the fair value of the derivatives exceeds the change in the fair value of the anticipated commodity purchases.
The Company entered into interest rate swaps in fiscal 2014 in order to manage interest costs and the risk associated with variable rates, whereby the Company pays a fixed rate on a total notional amount of $400,000 and receives one-month LIBOR. The fair value of interest rate swap agreements approximates the amount at which they could be settled, based on future LIBOR, and the established fixed rate is based primarily on quotes from banks. The Company performs assessments of the effectiveness of hedge instruments on a quarterly basis and determined the hedges to be highly effective. The counterparties to the interest rate swap agreements expose the Company to credit risk in the event of nonperformance. At July 3, 2016, the outstanding swap agreements were in a net liability position which would require the Company to make the net settlement payments to the counterparties if the agreements were settled as of that date. The Company does not anticipate nonperformance by the Company's counterparties. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
The Company entered into foreign currency forward contracts in 2016 to hedge forecasted cash payments to a customer. This transaction was designated and qualified as an effective cash flow hedge. Ineffectiveness with respect to forecasted inventory purchases or customer cash receipts is calculated based on changes in the forward rate until the anticipated purchase or cash receipt occurs; ineffectiveness of the hedge of the accounts payable is evaluated based on the change in fair value of its anticipated settlement.
The fair values of the commodity and foreign currency forward contracts are recorded in other assets or liabilities, as appropriate, and the effective portion is reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income in the financial statements. The gains or losses on the commodity forward contracts are recorded in inventory as the commodities are purchased and in cost of sales when the related inventory is sold. The gains or losses on the foreign currency forward contracts are recorded in earnings when the related inventory is sold or customer cash receipts are received.

16

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



Commodity forward contracts outstanding that hedge forecasted commodity purchases were as follows:
 
 
Number of Pounds
Copper
 
13,125

Zinc
 
4,280

Interest rate swap agreements in order to manage interest costs and the risk associated with variable interest rates were as follows:
 
 
Notional
 
Fair Value
 
Pay Fixed
 
Receive Floating
 
Maturity Date
Non-amortizing swap
 
$
100,000

 
$
(72
)
 
0.87
%
 
0.45
%
 
August 2016
Non-amortizing swap
 
$
100,000

 
$
(914
)
 
1.29
%
 
0.45
%
 
August 2017
Non-amortizing swap
 
$
100,000

 
$
(2,392
)
 
1.69
%
 
0.45
%
 
August 2018
Non-amortizing swap
 
$
50,000

 
$
(37
)
 
0.65
%
 
0.45
%
 
November 2016
Non-amortizing swap
 
$
50,000

 
$
(411
)
 
1.10
%
 
0.45
%
 
November 2017
The amount to be paid or received under these swaps is recorded as an adjustment to interest expense.
Outstanding foreign currency forward contracts were as follows:
 
 
Quantity Hedged
Euros sold
 
53,000

Euros purchased
 
5,723

Fair values in the condensed consolidated balance sheets related to derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments were as follows:
 
 
 
 
Asset Derivatives
Fair Value
 
Liability Derivatives
Fair Value
 
 
Location
 
July 3, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
July 3, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Commodity forward contracts
 
Other current assets /
other current liabilities
 
$
1,040

 
$

 
$
482

 
$
4,445

Commodity forward contracts
 
Other noncurrent assets /
other noncurrent liabilities
 
583

 

 

 

Foreign currency forward contracts
 
Other current assets /
other current liabilities
 
1,905

 
2,875

 
235

 
1,442

Foreign currency forward contracts
 
Other noncurrent assets /
other noncurrent liabilities
 
49

 
1,095

 

 
18

Interest rate contracts
 
Other current assets /
other current liabilities
 

 
9

 
109

 

Interest rate contracts
 
Other noncurrent assets /
other noncurrent liabilities
 

 

 
3,717

 
2,448

Total
 
 
 
$
3,577

 
$
3,979

 
$
4,543

 
$
8,353

Due to the nature of the Company's business, the benefits associated with the commodity contracts may be passed on to the customer and not realized by the Company.


17

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



For the periods presented below, the derivative gains and losses in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income related to derivative instruments were as follows:
 
 
Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI
 
 
Location
 
Amount
Quarter ended July 3, 2016
 
 
 
 
Commodity forward contracts
 
Cost of sales
 
$
(1,697
)
Interest rate contracts
 
Interest expense
 
$
(748
)
Foreign currency forward contracts
 
Cost of sales
 
$
(13
)
Quarter ended July 5, 2015
 
 
 
 
Commodity forward contracts
 
Cost of sales
 
$
(190
)
Interest rate contracts
 
Interest expense
 
$
(1,020
)
Foreign currency forward contracts
 
Cost of sales
 
$
(557
)
 
 
 
 
 
Six months ended July 3, 2016
 
 
 
 
Commodity forward contracts
 
Cost of sales
 
$
(3,732
)
Interest rate contracts
 
Interest expense
 
$
(1,506
)
Foreign currency forward contracts
 
Cost of sales
 
$
36

Six months ended July 5, 2015
 
 
 
 
Commodity forward contracts
 
Cost of sales
 
$
(2,808
)
Interest rate contracts
 
Interest expense
 
$
(2,030
)
Foreign currency forward contracts
 
Cost of sales
 
$
(9,693
)
The ineffective portion of derivative instruments was not material and no derivatives were excluded from effectiveness testing during the quarters and six months ended July 3, 2016 and July 5, 2015; accordingly, the Company did not recognize any related gains or losses in the income statement.
All derivatives used by the Company during the periods presented were designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes.
The Company expects the remaining unrealized losses will be realized and reported in cost of sales as the cost of the commodities is included in cost of sales. Estimated and actual gains or losses will change as market prices change.
9. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss ("AOCI")
The following table summarizes the components of AOCI, net of income taxes:
 
 
July 3, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Derivatives
 
$
(634
)
 
$
(3,059
)
Pension and other postretirement benefits
 
(752,069
)
 
(784,294
)
Available-for-sale securities
 
2,050

 
1,445

Total AOCI
 
$
(750,653
)
 
$
(785,908
)
10. Net Receivables
Net receivables, including amounts due under long-term contracts, consisted of the following:
 
 
July 3, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Billed receivables
 
$
303,785

 
$
217,522

Unbilled receivables
 
1,499,868

 
1,454,327

Less allowance for doubtful accounts
 
(1,009
)
 
(1,028
)
Net receivables
 
$
1,802,644

 
$
1,670,821


18

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



Receivable balances are shown net of customer progress payments received of $595,800 as of July 3, 2016 and $584,325 as of December 31, 2015.
Unbilled receivables represent the balance of recoverable costs and accrued profit, comprised principally of revenue recognized on contracts for which billings have not been presented to the customer because the amounts were earned but not contractually billable as of the balance sheet date. As of July 3, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the net receivable balance includes contract-related unbilled receivables which the Company does not expect to collect within the next 12 months of $277,700 and $311,600, respectively.
11. Net Inventories
Net inventories consisted of the following:
 
 
July 3, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Raw materials
 
$
73,615

 
$
88,365

Contracts in process
 
162,927

 
124,315

Finished goods
 
714

 
532

   Net inventories
 
$
237,256

 
$
213,212

12. Long-term Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
 
 
July 3, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Senior Credit Facility:
 
 
 
 
Term Loan A due 2020
 
$
770,000

 
$
790,000

Revolving Credit Facility due 2020
 
50,000

 

5.25% Senior Notes due 2021
 
300,000

 
300,000

5.50% Senior Notes due 2023
 
400,000

 
400,000

Principal amount of long-term debt
 
1,520,000

 
1,490,000

Unamortized debt issuance costs:
 
 
 
 
   Senior Credit Facility
 
5,561

 
6,302

   5.25% Senior Notes due 2021
 
1,750

 
1,915

   5.50% Senior Notes due 2023
 
5,564

 
5,947

Unamortized debt issuance costs
 
12,875

 
14,164

Long-term debt less unamortized debt issuance costs
 
1,507,125

 
1,475,836

Less: Current portion of long-term debt
 
40,000

 
40,000

Long-term debt
 
$
1,467,125

 
$
1,435,836

Senior Credit Facility
In September 2015, the Company refinanced its former senior credit facility with a new senior credit facility (the "Senior Credit Facility"), which is comprised of a term loan of $800,000 (the "Term Loan A") and a revolving credit facility of $1,000,000 (the "Revolving Credit Facility"), which mature in 2020. The Term Loan A is subject to quarterly principal payments of $10,000, with the remaining balance due at maturity. Substantially all tangible and intangible assets of the Company and certain domestic subsidiaries, excluding real property, are pledged as collateral under the Senior Credit Facility. Borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility bear interest at a per annum rate equal to either the sum of a base rate plus a margin or the sum of a LIBOR rate plus a margin. Each margin is based on the Company's total leverage ratio. In compliance with the terms of the Senior Credit Facility, the current base rate margin is 0.50% and the current LIBOR margin is 1.50%. The weighted-average interest rate for the Term Loan A, after taking into account the interest rate swaps discussed below, was 2.34% at July 3, 2016. The Company pays a quarterly commitment fee on the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Facility based on its total leverage ratio. Based on the Company's current total leverage ratio, this fee currently is 0.25%. As of July 3, 2016, the Company had borrowings of $50,000 under the Revolving Credit Facility and had outstanding letters of credit of $141,338, which reduced amounts available on the Revolving Credit Facility to $808,662. There are unamortized debt issuance

19

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



costs of $6,667 associated with the former senior credit facility in addition to debt issuance costs incurred related to the new Senior Credit Facility that are being amortized to interest expense over five years, the term of the Senior Credit Facility.
5.50% Senior Notes
In September 2015, the Company issued $400,000 aggregate principal amount of 5.50% Senior Notes (the "5.50% Notes") that mature on October 1, 2023. These notes are general unsecured obligations. Interest on these notes is payable on April 1 and October 1 of each year. The Company has the right to redeem some or all of these notes from time to time on or after October 1, 2018, at specified redemption prices. Prior to October 1, 2018, the Company may redeem some or all of these notes at a price equal to 100% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption and a specified make-whole premium. In addition, prior to October 1, 2018, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of these notes with the net cash proceeds of certain equity offerings, at a price equal to 105.5% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. Debt issuance costs of $6,136 related to these notes are being amortized to interest expense over eight years, the term of the notes.
5.25% Senior Notes
In fiscal 2014, the Company issued $300,000 aggregate principal amount of 5.25% Senior Notes (the "5.25% Notes") that mature on October 1, 2021. These notes are general unsecured obligations. Interest on these notes is payable on April 1 and October 1 of each year. The Company has the right to redeem some or all of these notes from time to time on or after October 1, 2016, at specified redemption prices. Prior to October 1, 2016, the Company may redeem some or all of these notes at a price equal to 100% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption and a specified make-whole premium. In addition, prior to October 1, 2016, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of these notes with the net cash proceeds of certain equity offerings, at a price equal to 105.25% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. Debt issuance costs of $2,625 related to these notes are being amortized to interest expense over eight years, the term of the notes.
Interest Rate Swaps
At July 3, 2016, the Company had interest rate swap agreements in order to manage interest costs and the risk associated with variable interest rates - see Note 8.
Rank and Guarantees
The 5.50% Notes and the 5.25% Notes are the Company’s general unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of the Company’s existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness, rank senior in right of payment to all of the Company’s existing and future subordinated indebtedness and are effectively subordinated to all existing and future senior secured indebtedness, including the Senior Credit Facility, to the extent of the collateral. The 5.50% Notes and the 5.25% Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured basis, jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally, by substantially all of the Company's domestic subsidiaries. The Senior Credit Facility obligations are guaranteed on a secured basis, jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally, by substantially all of the Company's domestic subsidiaries. All of these guarantor subsidiaries are 100% owned by the Company. The Company, exclusive of these guarantor subsidiaries, has no independent operations or material assets. The guarantee by any Subsidiary Guarantor of the Company's obligations in respect of the 5.50% Notes and the 5.25% Notes will be released in each of the following circumstances:
if, as a result of the sale of its capital stock, such Subsidiary Guarantor ceases to be a Restricted Subsidiary;

if such Subsidiary Guarantor is designated as an "Unrestricted Subsidiary" with respect to the 5.25% Notes and the 5.50% Notes;

upon defeasance or satisfaction and discharge of the 5.25% Notes and the 5.50% Notes, as applicable; and

if such Subsidiary Guarantor has been released from its guarantees of indebtedness under the credit agreement governing the Senior Credit Facility (the "Credit Agreement") and all capital markets debt securities.

20

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



Scheduled Minimum Loan Payments
The scheduled minimum loan payments on outstanding long-term debt are as follows:
Remainder of 2016
 
$
20,000

Calendar 2017
 
40,000

Calendar 2018
 
40,000

Calendar 2019
 
40,000

Calendar 2020
 
680,000

Thereafter
 
700,000

Total
 
$
1,520,000

Covenants and Default Provisions
The Company's Senior Credit Facility and the indentures governing the 5.50% Notes and the 5.25% Notes impose restrictions on the Company, including limitations on its ability to incur additional debt, enter into capital leases, grant liens, pay dividends and make certain other payments, sell assets, or merge or consolidate with or into another entity. In addition, the Senior Credit Facility limits the Company's ability to enter into sale-and-leaseback transactions. The 5.50% Notes and 5.25% Notes limit the aggregate sum of dividends, share repurchases, and other designated restricted payments to an amount based on the Company’s net income, stock issuance proceeds, and certain other items since April 1, 2001, less restricted payments made since that date. The Senior Credit Facility allows the Company to make unlimited "restricted payments" (as defined in the Credit Agreement), which, among other items, would allow payments for future stock repurchases, as long as the Company maintains a certain amount of liquidity and maintains certain senior secured debt limits, with a limit, when those senior secured debt limits are not met, of $250,000 plus proceeds of any equity issuances plus 50% of net income since October 7, 2010. The Senior Credit Facility also requires the Company to meet and maintain specified financial ratios, including a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum consolidated total leverage ratio. The Company's debt agreements contain cross-default provisions so that noncompliance with the covenants within one debt agreement could cause a default under other debt agreements as well. The Company's ability to comply with these covenants and to meet and maintain the financial ratios may be affected by events beyond its control. Borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility are subject to compliance with these covenants. As of July 3, 2016, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants.
13. Employee Benefit Plans
The components of net periodic benefit cost for pension benefits were as follows:
 
 
Pension Benefits
 
 
Quarter Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
 
July 3, 2016
 
July 5, 2015
 
July 3, 2016
 
July 5, 2015
Service cost
 
$
4,558

 
$
4,815

 
$
9,088

 
$
9,630

Interest cost
 
25,377

 
30,259

 
50,826

 
60,518

Expected return on plan assets
 
(40,437
)
 
(39,875
)
 
(81,155
)
 
(79,750
)
Amortization of unrecognized net loss
 
32,013

 
37,650

 
62,812

 
75,299

Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost
 
(5,151
)
 
(5,213
)
 
(10,302
)
 
(10,425
)
  Net periodic benefit cost
 
16,360

 
27,636

 
31,269

 
55,272

Special termination benefit cost / curtailment
 
56

 

 
1,673

 

  Net periodic benefit cost
 
$
16,416

 
$
27,636

 
$
32,942

 
$
55,272


21

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



During the six months ended July 3, 2016, the Company recorded a settlement expense of $1,673 to recognize the impact of lump sum benefit payments made in the non-qualified supplemental executive retirement plan.
The components of net periodic benefit income for other postretirement benefits were as follows:
 
 
Other Postretirement Benefits
 
 
Quarter Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
 
July 3, 2016
 
July 5, 2015
 
July 3, 2016
 
July 5, 2015
Service cost
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

Interest cost
 
827

 
1,126

 
1,682

 
2,252

Expected return on plan assets
 
(823
)
 
(922
)
 
(1,624
)
 
(1,844
)
Amortization of unrecognized net loss
 
330

 
496

 
727

 
992

Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost
 
(1,290
)
 
(1,813
)
 
(2,581
)
 
(3,626
)
  Net periodic benefit income
 
$
(956
)
 
$
(1,113
)
 
$
(1,796
)
 
$
(2,226
)
Effective January 1, 2016, the Company changed the approach used to measure service and interest costs for pension and other postretirement benefits. Prior to January 1, 2016, the Company measured service and interest costs utilizing a single weighted-average discount rate derived from the yield curve used to measure the plan obligations. For 2016, the Company has elected to measure service and interest costs by applying the specific spot rates along that yield curve to the plans’ liability cash flows. The Company believes the new approach provides a more precise measurement of service and interest costs by aligning the timing of the plans’ forecasted cash flows to the corresponding spot rates on the yield curve. This change does not affect the measurement of plan obligations. The Company accounted for this change on a prospective basis as a change in accounting estimate, resulting in lower pension expense compared to the method used prior to January 1, 2016.
Employer Contributions. During the six months ended July 3, 2016, the Company contributed $7,200 to the pension trust. The Company also paid $4,173 to retirees in connection with its nonqualified supplemental executive retirement plan and $3,326 to retirees in connection with its other postretirement benefit plans.
During the remainder of 2016, the Company anticipates making pension contributions of approximately $32,300 in order to meet the minimum required contributions for 2016. The Company anticipates making additional payments of approximately $1,295 to retirees under the nonqualified plan and $4,163 to retirees in connection with its other postretirement benefit plans during the remainder of 2016.
14. Income Taxes
The Company’s income taxes include federal, foreign and state income taxes. Income taxes for interim periods are based on estimated effective annual income tax rates.
The effective income tax rates for the quarters ended July 3, 2016 and July 5, 2015, were 31.0% and 32.4% (as restated), respectively. The decrease in the rate from the quarter ended July 5, 2015 is primarily due to a decrease in state tax expense and increased benefits from the Domestic Manufacturing Deduction and the Research and Development tax credit in the quarter ended July 3, 2016.
The effective income tax rates for the six months ended July 3, 2016 and July 5, 2015 were 28.4% and 56.2%, respectively. The decrease in the rate from the six months ended July 5, 2015 is primarily due to the impact of goodwill impairment and nondeductible transaction costs in the six months ended July 5, 2015 as well as increased benefits from the Domestic Manufacturing Deduction and the Research and Development tax credit in the six months ended July 3, 2016.
The Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal, various U.S. state and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2010. The IRS has completed the audits of the Company through fiscal 2012 and is currently auditing the Company's income tax returns for fiscal years 2013 and 2014. The Company believes appropriate provisions for all outstanding issues have been made for all remaining open years in all jurisdictions.
Although the timing and outcome of audit settlements are uncertain, it is reasonably possible that a $3,454 reduction of the uncertain tax benefits will occur in the next 12 months. The settlement of these unrecognized tax benefits could result in an increase in net income from $0 to $2,672.

22

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



15. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has 5,000,000 shares of $1.00 par value preferred stock authorized, none of which has been issued.
The Company sponsors five stock-based incentive plans: the Orbital ATK, Inc. 2015 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2015 Stock Incentive Plan"); three legacy ATK plans (the Alliant Techsystems Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, the Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan and the 1990 Equity Incentive Plan); and one legacy Orbital plan, under which the Company assumed the obligation to issue Company common stock pursuant to the terms of the Transaction Agreement relating to the Merger (the Orbital Sciences Corporation 2005 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan). At July 3, 2016, the Company had authorized up to 3,750,000 common shares under the 2015 Stock Incentive Plan, of which 2,813,165 common shares were available to be granted. No new grants will be made out of the other four plans.
There are five types of awards outstanding under the Company's stock incentive plans: performance awards, total stockholder return performance awards ("TSR awards"), restricted stock units, restricted stock and stock options. The Company issues treasury shares upon (i) the payment of performance awards, TSR awards and restricted stock units, (ii) the grant of restricted stock, and (iii) the exercise of stock options.
Restricted Stock Units. Pursuant to the terms of the Transaction Agreement and under the terms of the ATK 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, all of the performance awards and TSR awards outstanding as of February 9, 2015 were converted into time-vesting restricted stock units with vesting periods corresponding to the respective performance periods. During the six months ended July 3, 2016, 40,707 shares were issued upon the vesting of restricted stock units for the performance period ending in 2016. As of July 3, 2016, there were 54,258 restricted stock units outstanding for the performance period ending in 2017.
Performance Awards. Performance shares are valued at the fair value of the Company's stock as of the grant date and expense is recognized based on the number of shares expected to vest under the terms of the award under which they are granted.
As of July 3, 2016, there were 81,689 shares reserved for executive officers and key employees for the performance period beginning April 1, 2015 and ending December 31, 2017. Of these shares, up to 50% will become payable only upon achievement of a financial performance goal relating to absolute earnings per share growth; and up to 50% will become payable only upon achievement of a performance goal relating to absolute sales growth.
As of July 3, 2016, there were 73,802 shares reserved for executive officers and key employees for the performance period beginning January 1, 2016 and ending December 31, 2018. Of these shares, up to 50% will become payable only upon achievement of a financial performance goal relating to return on investment of capital; and up to 50% will become payable only upon achievement of a performance goal relating to absolute sales growth.
TSR Awards. As of July 3, 2016, there were 73,802 shares and 81,689 shares reserved for TSR awards for key employees for the fiscal year 2016-2018 and 2015-2017 performance periods, respectively. The Company used an integrated Monte Carlo simulation model to determine the fair value of the TSR awards. The Monte Carlo model calculates the probability of satisfying the market conditions stipulated in the award. This probability is an input into the trinomial lattice model used to determine the fair value of the awards as well as the assumptions of other variables, including the risk-free interest rate and expected volatility of the Company's stock price in future periods. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. dollar-denominated U.S. Treasury strip rate with a remaining term that approximates the life assumed at the date of grant. There were 73,802 TSR awards granted with a fair value of $87.85 per share and 3,208 TSR awards granted with a fair value of $94.93 per share during the six months ended July 3, 2016.
Restricted Stock Awards. Restricted stock granted to non-employee directors and certain key employees totaled 159,902 shares during the six months ended July 3, 2016. Restricted shares vest over periods generally ranging from one to three years from the date of award and are valued at the fair value of the Company's common stock as of the grant date.
Stock Options. Stock options are granted periodically, with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant, and generally vest from one to three years from the date of grant. Options are generally granted with seven-year or ten-year terms. The weighted-average fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and represents the difference between fair market value on the date of grant and the estimated market value on the expected exercise date. The option pricing model requires the Company to make assumptions. The risk-free rate is based on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term that approximates the expected life assumed at the date of grant. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company's stock over the past seven years. The expected option life is based on the contractual term of the stock option and expected employee

23

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



exercise and post-vesting employment termination trends. There were 72,328 stock options granted during the six months ended July 3, 2016 with a weighted-average fair value of $20.53 per stock option. There were 74,543 stock options granted during the six months ended July 5, 2015 with a weighted-average fair value of $39.44 per stock option.
Stock-based compensation expense totaled $6,451 and $11,091 in the quarter and six months ended July 3, 2016, respectively, and $9,003 and $22,323 in the quarter and six months ended July 5, 2015, respectively. The income tax benefit recognized for stock-based compensation was $2,459 and $4,263 during the quarter and six months ended July 3, 2016, respectively, and $3,466 and $7,621 during the quarter and six months ended July 5, 2015, respectively.
16. Contingencies
Litigation.    From time to time, the Company is subject to various legal proceedings, including lawsuits, which arise out of, and are incidental to, the conduct of the Company's business. The Company does not consider any of such proceedings that are currently pending, individually or in the aggregate, notwithstanding that the unfavorable resolution of any matter may have a material effect on net earnings in any particular quarter, to be material to its business or likely to result in a material adverse effect on its operating results, financial condition or cash flows.
U.S. Government Investigations.   The Company is also subject to U.S. Government investigations from which civil, criminal or administrative proceedings could result. Such proceedings could involve claims by the U.S. Government for fines, penalties, compensatory and treble damages, restitution and/or forfeitures. Under government regulations, a company, or one or more of its operating divisions or subdivisions, can also be suspended or debarred from government contracts, or lose its export privileges, based on the results of investigations. The Company believes, based upon all available information, that the outcome of any such pending government investigations will not have a material adverse effect on its operating results, financial condition or cash flows.
Claim Recovery.    Profits expected to be realized on contracts are based on management's estimates of total contract sales value and costs at completion. Estimated amounts for contract changes and claims are included in contract sales only when realization is estimated to be probable. Unbilled receivables included $26,999 and $25,042 as of July 3, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, for contract claims.
Environmental Liabilities.    The Company's operations and ownership or use of real property are subject to a number of federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations, including those for discharge of hazardous materials, remediation of contaminated sites and restoration of damage to the environment. At certain sites that the Company owns or operates or formerly owned or operated, there is known or potential contamination that the Company is required to investigate or remediate. The Company could incur substantial costs, including remediation costs, resource restoration costs, fines, and penalties, or third party property damage or personal injury claims, as a result of liabilities associated with past practices or violations of environmental laws or noncompliance with environmental permits.
The Company has been identified as a potentially responsible party (“PRP”), along with other parties, in several regulatory agency actions associated with hazardous waste sites. As a PRP, the Company may be required to pay a share of the costs of the investigation and clean-up of these sites. While uncertainties exist with respect to the amounts and timing of the ultimate environmental liabilities, based on currently available information, the Company has concluded that these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on operating results, financial condition, or cash flows.
The Company could incur substantial costs, including cleanup costs, resource restoration, fines and penalties or third party property damage or personal injury claims, as a result of violations or liabilities under environmental laws or noncompliance with environmental permits. While environmental laws and regulations have not had a material adverse effect on the Company's operating results, financial condition, or cash flows in the past and the Company has environmental management programs in place to mitigate these risks, it is difficult to predict whether they will have a material impact in the future.
The liability for environmental remediation represents management's best estimate of the present value of the probable and reasonably estimable costs related to known remediation obligations. The receivable represents the present value of the amount that the Company expects to recover, as discussed below. Both the liability and receivable have been discounted to reflect the present value of the expected future cash flows, using a discount rate of 0.3% and 0.7% as of July 3, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The Company's discount rate is calculated using the 20-year Treasury constant maturities rate, net of an estimated inflationary factor of 1.9%, rounded to the nearest quarter percent.

24

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



The following is a summary of the amounts recorded for environmental remediation:
 
 
July 3, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
Liability
 
Receivable
 
Liability
 
Receivable
Amounts (payable) receivable
 
$
(43,463
)
 
$
19,681

 
$
(41,824
)
 
$
18,236

Unamortized discount
 
740

 
(256
)
 
1,718

 
(568
)
Present value amounts (payable) receivable
 
$
(42,723
)
 
$
19,425

 
$
(40,106
)
 
$
17,668

Amounts expected to be paid or received in periods more than one year from the balance sheet date are classified as noncurrent. Of the $42,723 discounted liability as of July 3, 2016, $5,708 was recorded in other current liabilities and $37,015 was recorded in other noncurrent liabilities. Of the $19,425 discounted receivable, the Company recorded $3,313 in other current assets and $16,112 in other noncurrent assets. As of July 3, 2016, the estimated discounted range of reasonably possible costs of environmental remediation was $42,723 to $80,899.
The Company expects that a portion of its environmental compliance and remediation costs will be recoverable under U.S. Government contracts. Some of the remediation costs that are not recoverable from the U.S. Government that are associated with facilities purchased in a business acquisition are covered by various indemnification agreements, as described in Note 16 to the Company's audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Form 10-KT/A for the nine-month transition period ended December 31, 2015.
17. Share Repurchases
On March 11, 2015, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to the lesser of $75,000 or 1.0 million shares of its common stock through December 31, 2015. On August 4, 2015, the Board of Directors increased the amount authorized for repurchase to the lesser of $100,000 or 1.4 million shares of the Company's common stock. On October 29, 2015, the Board of Directors increased the amount authorized for repurchase to the lesser of $250,000 or 3.25 million shares through December 31, 2016.
Under the authorized repurchase program, shares of the Company's common stock may be purchased from time to time in the open market, subject to compliance with applicable laws and regulations and the Company’s debt covenants, depending upon market conditions and other factors. The Company purchased 194,003 shares for $16,839 and 528,104 shares for $44,241 during the quarter and six months ended July 3, 2016, respectively. The Company purchased 328,841 shares for $24,502 during the quarter and six months ended July 5, 2015.
In accordance with the Transaction Agreement entered into on April 28, 2014, the Company did not repurchase any outstanding shares prior to the closing of the Distribution and Merger during the quarter ended March 31, 2015.
18. Changes in Estimates
The majority of our sales are accounted for as long-term contracts, which are accounted for using the percentage of completion method. Accounting for contracts under the percentage of completion method requires judgment relative to assessing risks and estimating contract revenues and costs. Profits expected to be realized on contracts are based on management’s estimates of total contract sales value and costs at completion. Estimated amounts for contract changes, including scope and claims, are included in contract sales only when realization is probable. Assumptions used for recording sales and earnings are modified in the period of change to reflect revisions in contract value and estimated costs. In the period in which it is determined that a loss will be incurred on a contract, the entire amount of the estimated loss, based on gross profit along with general and administrative costs, is charged to cost of sales. Changes in estimates of contract value, costs or profits are recognized using the cumulative catch-up method of accounting. The cumulative effect of a change in estimate is recognized in the period a change in estimate occurs.
Changes in contract estimates occur for a variety of reasons including changes in contract scope, unforeseen changes in contract cost estimates due to unanticipated cost growth or risks affecting contract costs and/or the resolution of contract risks at lower costs than anticipated, as well as changes in contract overhead costs over the performance period. Changes in estimates could have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or annual results of operations.
Aggregate net changes in contract estimates recognized using the cumulative catch-up method of accounting increased operating income by approximately $56,000 and $4,000 (as restated) for the quarters ended July 3, 2016 and July 5, 2015, respectively. The changes in estimates for the quarter ended July 3, 2016 were attributable to profit margin improvements in all segments, primarily in Space Systems Group and Flight Systems Group. The changes in estimates for the quarter ended July 5,

25

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



2015 were attributable to profit margin improvements in Flight Systems Group, which were partially offset by reductions in profit margins in Space Systems Group and Defense Systems Group.
Aggregate net changes in contract estimates recognized using the cumulative catch-up method of accounting increased operating income by approximately $83,000 and $44,000 for the six months ended July 3, 2016 and July 5, 2015, respectively. The changes in estimates for the six months ended July 3, 2016 were attributable to profit margin improvements in all segments, primarily in Space Systems Group and Flight Systems Group. The changes in estimates for the six months ended July 5, 2015 were attributable to profit margin improvements in Defense Systems Group and Flight Systems Group, which were partially offset by reductions in profit margins in Space Systems Group. Estimated costs to complete on loss contracts at July 3, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were $1,299,490 and $1,392,218, respectively.
19. Restructuring Costs
The Company had restructuring liabilities for termination benefits of $593 and $3,589 and facility-related costs of $20,830 and $26,154, at July 3, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The decrease in restructuring liabilities for the quarter and six months ended July 3, 2016, was primarily attributed to cash expenditures for termination benefits and facilities.
20. Operating Segment Information
The Company operates its business structure within three operating groups. These operating segments ("groups") are defined based on the reporting and review process used by the Company's chief executive officer and other management.  The operating structure aligns the Company's capabilities and resources with its customers and markets and positions the Company for long-term growth and improved profitability.
Flight Systems Group develops rockets that are used as small- and medium-class space launch vehicles to place satellites into Earth orbit and escape trajectories, interceptor and target vehicles for missile defense systems and suborbital launch vehicles that place payloads into a variety of high-altitude trajectories. The group also develops and produces medium- and large-class rocket propulsion systems for human and cargo launch vehicles, strategic missiles, missile defense interceptors and target vehicles. Additionally, Flight Systems Group operates in the military and commercial aircraft and launch structures markets. Other products include illuminating flares and aircraft countermeasures.
Defense Systems Group develops and produces small-, medium-, and large-caliber ammunition, precision weapons and munitions, high performance gun systems, and propellant and energetic materials. It operates the Lake City Army Ammunition Plant in Independence, MO ("LCAAP") and a Naval Sea Systems Command ("NAVSEA") facility in Rocket Center, WV. Defense Systems Group is also a leader in tactical solid rocket motor development and production for a variety of air-, sea- and land-based missile systems. The group serves a variety of domestic and international customers in the defense and security markets in a prime contractor, partner or supplier role. Defense Systems Group also provides propulsion control systems that support Missile Defense Agency and NASA programs, airborne missile warning systems, advanced fuzes, and defense electronics. The group produces the U.S. Navy's Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile ("AARGM") and has developed advanced air-breathing propulsion systems and special-mission aircraft for defense applications.
Space Systems Group develops and produces small- and medium-class satellites that are used to enable global and regional communications and broadcasting, conduct space-related scientific research, and perform other activities related to national security. In addition, Space Systems Group develops and produces human-rated space systems for Earth-orbit and deep-space exploration, including re-supplying the International Space Station. This Group is also a provider of spacecraft components and subsystems and specialized engineering and operations services to U.S. Government agencies.

26

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



The following summarizes the Company's results by segment:
 
Quarters Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
July 3, 2016
 
July 5, 2015
 
July 3, 2016
 
July 5, 2015
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
Sales to external customers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Flight Systems Group
$
370,656

 
$
380,219

 
$
720,982

 
$
683,945

Defense Systems Group
448,388

 
430,824

 
874,790

 
914,954

Space Systems Group
264,301

 
292,535

 
543,968

 
475,829

Total external sales
1,083,345

 
1,103,578

 
2,139,740

 
2,074,728

Intercompany sales:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Flight Systems Group
3,449

 
11,260

 
7,079

 
34,868

Defense Systems Group
5,437

 
1,990

 
9,728

 
17,404

Space Systems Group
14,749

 
4,703

 
20,836

 
9,511

Corporate
(23,635
)
 
(17,953
)
 
(37,643
)
 
(61,783
)
Net intercompany sales

 

 

 

Total sales
$
1,083,345

 
$
1,103,578

 
$
2,139,740

 
$
2,074,728

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations, before interest, income taxes and noncontrolling interest:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Flight Systems Group
$
57,873

 
$
50,501

 
$
107,568

 
$
92,232

Defense Systems Group
51,246

 
39,042

 
93,371

 
96,479

Space Systems Group
46,587

 
30,014

 
76,419

 
9,307

Corporate
(8,161
)
 
(18,014
)
 
(9,334
)
 
(92,866
)
Total income from continuing operations, before interest, income taxes and noncontrolling interest
$
147,545

 
$
101,543

 
$
268,024

 
$
105,152

 
 
July 3, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Total assets:
 
 
 
 
Flight Systems Group
 
$
2,284,084

 
$
2,223,787

Defense Systems Group
 
1,277,543

 
1,184,071

Space Systems Group
 
1,233,799

 
1,272,425

Corporate
 
522,102

 
643,412

Total assets
 
$
5,317,528

 
$
5,323,695

Certain administrative functions are primarily managed by the Company at the corporate headquarters ("Corporate"). Some examples of such functions are human resources, pension and postretirement benefits, corporate accounting, legal, tax and treasury. Significant assets and liabilities managed at Corporate include those associated with debt, restructuring, pension and postretirement benefits, environmental liabilities, litigation liabilities, strategic growth costs and income taxes.
Costs related to the administrative functions managed by Corporate are either recorded at Corporate or allocated to the segments based on the nature of the expense. The difference between pension and postretirement benefit expense calculated under U.S. GAAP and the expense calculated under U.S. Cost Accounting Standards is recorded at the corporate level which provides for greater clarity on the operating results of the business segments. Administrative expenses such as corporate accounting, legal and treasury costs are allocated out to the business segments. Environmental expenses are allocated to each segment based on the origin of the underlying environmental cost. Transactions between segments are recorded at the segment level, consistent with the Company's financial accounting policies. Intercompany balances and transactions involving different

27

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)



segments are eliminated at the Company's consolidated financial statements level and are shown above in Corporate. The amortization expense related to purchase accounting attributed to the acquisition of Orbital is also recorded in Corporate.
21. Subsequent Events

As a result of the Restatement, the Company was unable to timely file its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q with the SEC for the fiscal quarters ended July 3, 2016 and October 2, 2016 ("the 2016 Quarterly Reports"), as well as its Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2016. The Company has entered into an extension agreement with its Senior Credit Facility lender group to extend, until April 14, 2017, the deadline under the Senior Credit Facility for filing with the SEC the 2016 Quarterly Reports, as well as an amended Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2016 and the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2016. As a result of the extension, the Company is in compliance with the financial covenants as of the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q based on the Company's restated financial results.

Securities Class Action. On August 12, 2016, a putative class action complaint, naming the Company, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer as defendants, was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Steven Knurr, et al. v. Orbital ATK, Inc., No. 16-cv-01031 (TSE-MSN)). The class action complaint asserts claims on behalf of purchasers of Orbital ATK securities for violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, arising out of allegedly false and misleading statements and the failure to disclose that: (i) the Company lacked effective control over financial reporting; and (ii) as a result, the Company failed to record an anticipated loss on its long-term contract with the U.S. Army to manufacture and supply small caliber ammunition at the U.S. Army’s Lake City Army Ammunition Plant. The complaint seeks a determination that this matter is a proper class action and certifying the plaintiff as the class representative, an award of damages, an award of reasonable costs and expenses of trial, including counsel and expert fees, and an award of such other relief as deemed appropriate by the Court. The Company intends to defend this action vigorously.

SEC Investigation. The SEC is conducting a non-public investigation relating to our historical accounting practices as a result of the prior restatement of the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarterly periods ended July 5, 2015 and October 4, 2015 as described in the Company's Amendment to the Transition Report on Form 10-K for the nine-month transition period ending December 31, 2015 filed on March 15, 2016. The Company has also voluntarily self-reported to the SEC regarding matters pertaining to the Restatement described in the Company's
Form 10-K/A. The Company is cooperating fully with the SEC in connection with these matters.


28


ITEM 2.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data and unless otherwise indicated)
Restatement of Previously Issued Consolidated Financial Statements
In this Form 10-Q, we have restated our unaudited condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the quarter ended July 5, 2015 as disclosed in the Company’s Amended Transition Report on Form 10-K/A ("Form 10-K/A") for the nine-month transition period ended December 31, 2015 filed on February 24, 2017 with the SEC. This Form 10-Q is reflective of the Restatement and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Form 10-K/A. See Note 3 - Restatement in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 - Financial Statements for additional information regarding the errors identified and the restatement adjustments made to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Forward-looking Information is Subject to Risk and Uncertainty
Some of the statements made and information contained in this report, excluding historical information, are "forward-looking statements" as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements give the Company's current expectations or forecasts of future events. Words such as "may," "will," "expected," "intend," "estimate," "anticipate," "believe," "project," or "continue," and similar expressions are used to identify forward-looking statements. From time to time, the Company also may provide oral or written forward-looking statements in other materials released to the public. Any or all forward-looking statements in this report and in any public statements the Company makes could be materially different. They can be affected by assumptions used or by known or unknown risks or uncertainties. Consequently, no forward-looking statements can be guaranteed. Actual results may vary materially. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. You should also understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors and you should not consider the following list to be a complete statement of all potential risks and uncertainties. Any change in the following factors may impact the achievement of results:

the effect of the Restatement of our previously issued financial results, and any actual or unasserted claims, investigations or proceedings as a result of the Restatement,

our ability to remediate the material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting described in Part I, Item 4 of this Form 10-Q,

reductions or changes in NASA or U.S. Government military spending, timing of payments and budgetary policies, including impacts of sequestration under the Budget Control Act of 2011, and sourcing strategies,

intense competition for U.S. Government contracts and programs,

increases in costs, which the Company may not be able to react to due to the nature of its U.S. Government contracts,
changes in cost and revenue estimates and/or timing of programs,
the potential termination of U.S. Government contracts and the potential inability to recover termination costs,
other risks associated with U.S. Government contracts that might expose the Company to adverse consequences,
government laws and other rules and regulations applicable to the Company, including procurement and import-export control,
reduction or change in demand and manufacturing costs for military and commercial ammunition,
the manufacture and sale of products that create exposure to potential product liability, warranty liability or personal injury claims and litigation,
risks associated with expansion into new and adjacent commercial markets,
results of the Merger or other acquisitions or transactions, including our ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses and realize anticipated synergies, cost savings and other benefits, and costs incurred for pursuits and proposed acquisitions,

29


greater risk associated with international business, including foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations in those rates,
federal and state regulation of defense products and ammunition,
costs of servicing the Company's debt, including cash requirements and interest rate fluctuations,
actual pension and other postretirement plan asset returns and assumptions regarding future returns, discount rates, service costs, mortality rates and health care cost trend rates,
security threats, including cyber-security and other industrial and physical security threats, and other disruptions,
supply, availability and costs of raw materials and components, including commodity price fluctuations,
performance of the Company's subcontractors,
development of key technologies and retention of a qualified workforce,
performance of our products,
fires or explosions at any of the Company's facilities,
government investigations and audits,
environmental laws that govern current and past practices and rules and regulations, noncompliance with which may expose the Company to adverse consequences,
impacts of financial market disruptions or volatility to the Company's customers and vendors,
unanticipated changes in income taxes or exposure to additional tax liabilities, and
costs and ultimate outcome of litigation matters, government investigations and other legal proceedings.
This list of factors is not exhaustive, and new factors may emerge or changes to the foregoing factors may occur that would impact our business. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, except as required by law. A more detailed description of risk factors can be found in Part 1, Item 1A, Risk Factors, of the Company’s Form 10-K/A. Additional information regarding these and other factors may be contained in the Company's subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including Forms 10-Q and 8-K. All such risk factors are difficult to predict, contain material uncertainties that may affect actual results, and may be beyond our control.
Executive Summary
We are an aerospace and defense systems company and supplier of products to the U.S. Government, allied nations, prime contractors and other customers. Our main systems and products include launch vehicles and related propulsion systems, satellites and associated components and services, composite aerospace structures, tactical missiles, subsystems and defense electronics and precision weapons, armament systems and ammunition. We are headquartered in Dulles, Virginia and have operating locations throughout the United States.
On February 9, 2015, we completed a tax-free spin-off and distribution of our former Sporting Group to our stockholders (the “Distribution”) as a new public company called Vista Outdoor Inc. ("Vista Outdoor"). Immediately following the Distribution, we combined with Orbital Sciences Corporation ("Orbital") through the merger of a Company subsidiary with Orbital (the "Merger"). Following the Distribution and Merger, we changed our name from Alliant Techsystems Inc. to Orbital ATK, Inc.
We conduct business in three segments:
Flight Systems Group develops rockets that are used as small- and medium-class space launch vehicles to place satellites into Earth orbit and escape trajectories, interceptor and target vehicles for missile defense systems and suborbital launch vehicles that place payloads into a variety of high-altitude trajectories. The group also develops and produces medium- and large-class rocket propulsion systems for human and cargo launch vehicles, strategic missiles, missile defense interceptors and target vehicles. Additionally, Flight Systems Group operates in the military and commercial aircraft and launch structures markets. In addition, the division produces advanced flares and decoys that provide illumination for search and rescue missions and countermeasures against missile attacks.

30


Defense Systems Group develops and produces small-, medium-, and large-caliber military ammunition, propulsion systems for tactical missiles and missile defense applications, strike weapons, precision weapons and munitions, high-performance gun systems, aircraft survivability systems, fuzes and warheads, energetic materials and special mission aircraft.
Space Systems Group develops and produces small- and medium-class satellites that are used to enable global and regional communications and broadcasting, conduct space-related scientific research, and perform other activities related to national security. In addition, Space Systems Group develops and produces human-rated space systems for Earth-orbit and deep-space exploration, including cargo delivery to the International Space Station. This group is also a provider of spacecraft components and subsystems and specialized engineering and operations services to U.S. government agencies.
Financial Highlights for the Quarter Ended July 3, 2016
Quarterly sales of $1.08 billion.
Diluted earnings per share of $1.55.
New firm and option contract bookings of $1.5 billion and option exercises of $0.3 billion under existing contracts.
Total backlog of $14.7 billion at July 3, 2016.
Income from continuing operations, before interest, income taxes and noncontrolling interest as a percentage of sales of 13.6%.
Effective income tax rate of 31.0%.
The company paid quarterly dividend of $0.30 on June 23, 2016 to stockholders of record on June 8, 2016.
The company repurchased 194,003 shares for $16,800during the quarter ended July 3, 2016.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K/A, and the same accounting policies are used in preparing the Company’s interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Company follows accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales, expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The Company re-evaluates its estimates on an on-going basis. The Company’s estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
More information on these policies can be found in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, of the Company’s Form 10-K/A.
Results of Operations
The following information should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements. The key performance indicators that management uses in managing the business are sales, income before interest and income taxes, and cash flows.
Group sales, Cost of Sales, and Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Interest, Income Taxes and Noncontrolling Interest include intergroup sales and profit. Corporate and Eliminations include intergroup sales and profit eliminations and corporate expenses.
As a general note, results for the six months ended July 3, 2016 include Orbital for the full six months, whereas results for the six months ended July 5, 2015 include Orbital after the Merger date of February 9, 2015.

31


Sales
 
Quarters Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
July 3, 2016
 
July 5, 2015
 
Change
 
Percent Change
 
July 3, 2016
 
July 5, 2015
 
Change
 
Percent Change
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Flight Systems Group
$
374,105

 
$
391,479

 
$
(17,374
)
 
(4.4
)%
 
$
728,061

 
$
718,813

 
$
9,248

 
1.3
 %
Defense Systems Group
453,825

 
432,814

 
21,011

 
4.9
 %
 
884,518

 
932,358

 
(47,840
)
 
(5.1
)%
Space Systems Group
279,050

 
297,238

 
(18,188
)
 
(6.1
)%
 
564,804

 
485,340

 
79,464

 
16.4
 %
Corporate/Eliminations
(23,635
)
 
(17,953
)
 
(5,682
)
 
(31.6
)%
 
(37,643
)
 
(61,783
)
 
24,140

 
39.1
 %
Total sales
$
1,083,345

 
$
1,103,578

 
$
(20,233
)
 
(1.8
)%
 
$
2,139,740

 
$
2,074,728

 
$
65,012

 
3.1
 %
Quarter:
Fluctuations in sales were driven by program-related changes within the operating segments and the impact of the Merger as described below.
Flight Systems Group.    The decrease was primarily due to lower sales of $13,200 in Launch Vehicles Division primarily due to decreased activity on CRS I and Target Vehicles, partially offset by activity from a newly awarded CRS II contract. The decrease was also due to lower sales in Aerospace Systems of $5,000. Additionally, Propulsion Systems Division had lower sales of $1,300 due to the termination of a commercial contract in 2015.
Defense Systems Group.    The increase was due to higher sales in Missile Products Division of $21,900 primarily due to higher production volume on tactical propulsion and $11,900 in Defense Electronic Division due to increased activity on strike missiles. This increase was partially offset by lower sales of $12,500 in Small Caliber Systems Division primarily reflecting a reduction in production of small-caliber ammunition.
Space Systems Group.    The decrease was due to lower sales of $33,700 in commercial satellites primarily due to lower contract activity, partially offset by an increase of $24,600 in government satellites due to increased contract activity from a newly awarded CRS II contract and increased activity on the CRS I contract.
Corporate. The change in eliminations was driven primarily by higher intergroup sales.
Six Months:
Fluctuations in sales were driven by program-related changes within the operating segments and the impact of the Merger as described below.
Flight Systems Group.    The increase in sales was primarily due to the inclusion of Orbital's former Launch Vehicles segment, now referred to as Launch Vehicles Division, for the full six months ended July 3, 2016; whereas, sales for the six months ended July 5, 2015 include the results of Launch Vehicles Division beginning with the Merger date. Launch Vehicles Division sales were $273,500 for the six months ended July 3, 2016, compared to $220,600 for the six months ended July 5, 2015. This increase was offset largely by decreased sales of $40,200 in Propulsion Systems Division due primarily to the termination of a commercial contract in 2015.
Defense Systems Group.   The decrease in sales was primarily due to a decrease of $65,700 in Armament Systems Division primarily due to lower international sales, partially offset by an increase of $9,800 in Small Caliber Systems Division due to higher production.
Space Systems Group.    The increase was primarily due to higher sales of $116,100 in government satellites due to increased activity on the CRS 1 contract, activity from the newly awarded CRS 2 contract and to the inclusion of Orbital's former Advanced Space Programs and Satellite and Space Systems for the full six months ended July 3, 2016; whereas, sales for the six months ended July 5, 2015 include the results of former Advanced Space Programs and Satellite and Space Systems beginning with the Merger date. This increase was partially offset by lower sales of $20,500 in commercial satellites primarily due to decreased contract activity and a decrease of $3,300 in Space Components Division.
Corporate. The change in eliminations was driven primarily by lower intergroup sales from Defense Systems Group, due to the spin-off of Vista Outdoor as a result of the Distribution.

32


Cost of Sales
 
Quarters Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
July 3, 2016
 
July 5, 2015
 
Change
 
Percent Change
 
July 3, 2016
 
July 5, 2015
 
Change
 
Percent Change
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Flight Systems Group
$
267,620

 
$
300,744

 
$
(33,124
)
 
(11.0
)%
 
$
534,844

 
$
545,331

 
$
(10,487
)
 
(1.9
)%
Defense Systems Group
356,688

 
353,403

 
3,285

 
0.9
 %
 
707,410

 
745,655

 
(38,245
)
 
(5.1
)%
Space Systems Group
208,775

 
236,089

 
(27,314
)
 
(11.6
)%
 
440,087

 
393,834

 
46,253

 
11.7
 %
Corporate/Eliminations
(29,550
)
 
(9,519
)
 
(20,031
)
 
(210.4
)%
 
(49,248
)
 
(56,226
)
 
6,978

 
12.4
 %
Total cost of sales
$
803,533

 
$
880,717

 
$
(77,184
)
 
(8.8
)%
 
$
1,633,093

 
$
1,628,594

 
$
4,499

 
0.3
 %
Quarter:
The fluctuation in cost of sales was driven by program-related changes within the operating segments and the impact of the Merger as described below.
Flight Systems Group.    The decrease in cost of sales was primarily due to lower cost of sales in Launch Vehicles Division primarily due to lower contract activity.
Defense Systems Group.    The increase in cost of sales was primarily due to higher cost of sales of $14,600 in Missile Products Division mainly due to higher production volume on tactical propulsion and $9,000 in Defense Electronic Division mainly due to increased activity on strike missiles. This increase was partially offset by lower cost of sales of $11,800 in Armament Systems Division that reflected decreased foreign sales and a decrease of $10,000 in Small Caliber Systems Division due to lower production volume.
Space Systems Group.    The decrease in cost of sales was due to lower contract activity in commercial satellites of $28,600 and Space Components Division of $6,400, partially offset by higher contract activity in government satellites of $14,200.
Corporate. Cost of sales includes differences due to pension and postretirement benefit expense calculated under U.S. GAAP and the expense calculated under U.S. Cost Accounting Standards ("CAS"); amortization of intangible assets recorded in connection with the Merger; and, the elimination of intercompany sales. The change in corporate/eliminations was largely driven by higher intergroup sales.
Six Months:
The fluctuation in cost of sales was driven by program-related changes within the operating segments and the impact of the Merger as described below.
Flight Systems Group.    The decrease in cost of sales was primarily due to a decrease of $38,700 in Propulsion Systems Division due to the termination of a commercial contract in 2015 and lower contract activity. This decrease was partially offset by the inclusion of Orbital's former Launch Vehicles segment, now referred to as Launch Vehicles Division, for the full six months ended July 3, 2016; whereas, sales for the six months ended July 5, 2015 include the results of Launch Vehicles Division beginning with the Merger date. Launch Vehicles Division cost of sales were $196,000 for the six months ended July 3, 2016, compared to $172,000 for the six months ended July 5, 2015.
Defense Systems Group.    The decrease was primarily due to lower cost of sales of $63,500 in Armament Systems Division, partially offset by higher cost of sales of $13,200 in Small Caliber Systems Division and $17,300 in Defense Electronic Division.
Space Systems Group.    The increase in cost of sales was primarily due to the inclusion of Orbital's former Advanced Space Programs and Satellite and Space Systems segments for the full six months ended July 3, 2016; whereas, sales for the six months ended July 5, 2015 include the results of those former Orbital segments beginning with the Merger date. The increase was also due to increased activity on CRS I and the newly awarded CRS II contract in government satellites.
Corporate. The change in corporate/eliminations was driven primarily by lower intergroup sales from Defense Systems Group, due to the spin-off of Vista Outdoor in the Distribution and higher amortization expense resulting from the Merger.

33


Operating Expenses
 
 
Quarters Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
 
July 3, 2016
 
Percent of Sales
 
July 5, 2015
 
Percent of Sales
 
Change
 
July 3, 2016
 
Percent of Sales
 
July 5, 2015
 
Percent of Sales
 
Change
 
 
 
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Research and development
 
$
35,752

 
3.3
%
 
$
24,664

 
2.2
%
 
$
11,088

 
$
55,531

 
2.6
%
 
$
50,032

 
2.4
%
 
$
5,499

Selling
 
26,993

 
2.5

 
32,504

 
3.0

 
(5,511
)
 
54,041

 
2.5

 
53,412

 
2.5

 
629

General and administrative
 
69,522

 
6.4

 
64,150

 
5.8

 
5,372

 
129,051

 
6.0

 
203,238

 
9.8

 
(74,187
)
Goodwill impairment
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
34,300

 
1.7

 
(34,300
)
Total operating expenses
 
$
132,267

 
12.2
%
 
$
121,318

 
11.0
%
 
$
10,949

 
$
238,623

 
11.1
%
 
$
340,982

 
16.4
%
 
$
(102,359
)
Quarter:
Operating expenses increased $10,949 in the quarter ended July 3, 2016 compared to the quarter ended July 5, 2015 primarily due to an increase in research and development expenses related to new rocket motors and advanced ammunition projects in the quarter ended July 3, 2016.
Six Months:
Operating expenses decreased $102,359 in the six months ended July 3, 2016 compared to the six months ended July 5, 2015 primarily due to $18,000 of transaction costs pertaining to the Merger and Distribution, $15,000 of restructuring charges, a $25,000 charge related to a lawsuit settlement and a goodwill impairment charge of $34,300 in the six months ended July 5, 2015. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in research and development.
Income from Continuing Operations, Before Interest, Income Taxes and Noncontrolling Interest
 
 
Quarters Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
 
July 3, 2016
 
July 5, 2015
 
Change
 
July 3, 2016
 
July 5, 2015
 
Change
 
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Flight Systems Group
 
$
57,873

 
$
50,501

 
$
7,372

 
$
107,568

 
$
92,232

 
$
15,336

Defense Systems Group
 
51,246

 
39,042

 
12,204

 
93,371

 
96,479

 
(3,108
)
Space Systems Group
 
46,587

 
30,014

 
16,573

 
76,419

 
9,307

 
67,112

Corporate/Eliminations
 
(8,161
)
 
(18,014
)
 
9,853

 
(9,334
)
 
(92,866
)
 
83,532

Total
 
$
147,545

 
$
101,543

 
$
46,002

 
$
268,024

 
$
105,152

 
$
162,872

Quarter:
The fluctuations in income from continuing operations, before interest, income taxes and noncontrolling interest are described as follows:
Flight Systems Group.    The increase in income was primarily due to higher margins due to product mix, partially offset by increased research and development costs in Launch Vehicles Division.
Defense Systems Group.    The increase in income was due primarily to the impact of favorable changes in estimated contract profit in the quarter ended July 3, 2016 compared to the quarter ended July 5, 2015, partially offset by increased research and development costs in Armament Systems Division related to advanced ammunition projects.
Space Systems Group.    The increase in income was primarily due to the impact of favorable changes in estimated contract profit.
Corporate.    Results reflect unallocated expenses incurred for administrative functions that are performed centrally at the corporate headquarters, amortization of intangible assets recorded in connection with the Merger, and the elimination of intercompany profits.

34


Six Months:
The fluctuations in income from continuing operations, before interest, income taxes and noncontrolling interest are described as follows:
Flight Systems Group.    The increase in income was primarily due to the impact of favorable changes in estimated contract profit in the six months ended July 3, 2016, which were greater than the favorable changes in estimated contract profit in the six months ended July 5, 2015.
Defense Systems Group.    The decrease in income was primarily due to the impact of favorable changes in estimated contract profit in the six months ended July 3, 2016. which were less than the favorable changes in estimated contract profit in the six months ended July 5, 2015.
Space Systems Group.    The increase in income was primarily due to the impact of favorable changes in estimated contract profit in the six months ended July 3, 2016, compared to unfavorable changes in estimated contract profit in the six months ended July 5, 2015. In addition, income for the six months ended July 5, 2015 included a goodwill impairment charge of $34,300.
Corporate.    The decrease in corporate expenses for the six months ended July 3, 2016 compared to the six months ended July 5, 2015 was largely driven by: $18,000 of transaction costs pertaining to the Merger and Distribution, $15,000 of restructuring charges and a $25,000 charge related to a lawsuit settlement in the six months ended July 5, 2015; by reduced eliminations during the six months ended July 3, 2016 driven primarily by lower intergroup sales from Defense Systems Group, due to the spin-off of Vista Outdoor in the Distribution, partially offset by higher amortization expense in the six months ended July 3, 2016 resulting from the Merger.
Changes in Estimates. The majority of our sales are accounted for as long-term contracts, which are accounted for using the percentage-of-completion method. Accounting for contracts under percentage-of-completion requires judgment relative to assessing risks and estimating contract revenues and costs. Profits expected to be realized on contracts are based on management’s estimates of total contract sales value and costs at completion. Estimated amounts for contract changes, including scope and claims, are included in contract sales only when realization is probable. Assumptions used for recording sales and earnings are modified in the period of change to reflect revisions in contract value and estimated costs. In the period in which it is determined that a loss will be incurred on a contract, the entire amount of the estimated loss, based on gross profit along with general and administrative costs, is charged to cost of sales. Changes in estimates of contract sales, costs or profits are recognized using the cumulative catch-up method of accounting. This method recognizes in the current period the cumulative effect of the changes on current or prior periods. The effect of the changes on future periods of contract performance is recognized as if the revised estimate had been used since contract inception.
Changes in contract estimates occur for a variety of reasons including changes in contract scope, unforeseen changes in contract cost estimates due to unanticipated cost growth or risks affecting contract costs and/or the resolution of contract risks at lower costs than anticipated, as well as changes in contract overhead costs over the performance period. Changes in estimates could have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or annual results of operations. Aggregate net changes in contract estimates recognized using the cumulative catch-up method of accounting increased operating income by approximately $56,000 and $4,000 for the quarters ended July 3, 2016 and July 5, 2015, respectively. Included in the $56,000 is $28,000 of net changes in contract estimates made subsequent to July 3, 2016 through the date of issuance of these financial statements, $19,000 and $9,000 of which would have been recorded in the third and fourth quarters ended October 2, 2016 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The remaining changes in estimates for the quarter ended July 3, 2016 were attributable to profit margin improvements in all segments, primarily in Space Systems Group and Flight Systems Group. The changes in estimates for the quarter ended July 5, 2015 were attributable to profit margin improvements in Flight Systems Group, which were partially offset by reductions in profit margins in Space Systems Group and Defense Systems Group.
Aggregate net changes in contract estimates recognized using the cumulative catch-up method of accounting increased operating income by approximately $83,000 and $44,000 for the six months ended July 3, 2016 and July 5, 2015, respectively. The changes in estimates for the six months ended July 3, 2016 were attributable to profit margin improvements in all segments, primarily in Space Systems Group and Flight Systems Group. The changes in estimates for the six months ended July 5, 2015 were attributable to profit margin improvements in Defense Systems Group and Flight Systems Group, which were partially offset by reductions in profit margins in Space Systems Group.

35


Net Interest Expense
Net interest expense for the quarter ended July 3, 2016 was $16,267, an increase of $483 compared to $15,784 in the quarter ended July 5, 2015. Net interest expense for the six months ended July 3, 2016 was $33,579, a decrease of $2,956 compared to $36,535 in the six months ended July 5, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the average amount of debt outstanding, a lower weighted-average interest rate and less amortization of deferred financing costs.
Income Taxes (from Continuing Operations)
 
 
Quarters Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
 
July 3, 2016
 
Effective Rate
 
July 5, 2015
 
Effective Rate
 
Change
 
July 3, 2016
 
Effective Rate
 
July 5, 2015
 
Effective Rate
 
Change
 
 
 
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income taxes
 
$
40,690

 
31.0
%
 
$
27,806

 
32.4
%
 
$
12,884

 
$
66,584

 
28.4
%
 
$
23,583

 
56.2
%
 
$
43,001

Quarter:
The effective income tax rates for the quarters ended July 3, 2016 and July 5, 2015, were 31.0% and 32.4% (as restated), respectively. The decrease in the rate from the quarter ended July 5, 2015 is primarily due to a decrease in state tax expense and increased benefits from the Domestic Manufacturing Deduction and the Research and Development tax credit in the quarter ended July 3, 2016.
Six Months:
The effective income tax rates for the six months ended July 3, 2016 and July 5, 2015, were 28.4% and 56.2%, respectively. The decrease in the rate from the six months ended July 5, 2015 is primarily due to the impact of goodwill impairment and nondeductible transaction costs in the six months ended July 5, 2015, partially offset by increased benefits from the Domestic Manufacturing Deduction and the Research and Development tax credit in the six months ended July 3, 2016.
Income From Continuing Operations, Before Noncontrolling Interest
Net income from continuing operations before noncontrolling interest for the quarter ended July 3, 2016 was $90,588, an increase of $32,635 compared to $57,953 in the quarter ended July 5, 2015.
Net income from continuing operations before noncontrolling interest for the six months ended July 3, 2016 was $167,861, an increase of $149,453 compared to $18,408 in the six months ended July 5, 2015.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We manage our business to maximize operating cash flows as the primary source of liquidity. In addition to cash on hand and cash generated by operations, sources of liquidity include a credit facility, long-term borrowings, and access to the public debt and equity markets. We use our cash to fund investments in our existing core businesses; and for debt repayment, cash dividends, share repurchases, acquisitions and other activities.
Cash Flow Summary
Our cash flows from continuing operations for operating, investing and financing activities, as reflected in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows are summarized as follows:
 
 
Six Months Ended
 
 
July 3, 2016
 
July 5, 2015
Cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations
 
$
70,110

 
$
135,383

Cash (used in) provided by investing activities of continuing operations
 
(60,562
)
 
365,227

Cash used in financing activities of continuing operations
 
(53,796
)
 
(573,385
)
Net cash flows from continuing operations
 
$
(44,248
)
 
$
(72,775
)

36


Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations during the six months ended July 3, 2016 was $70,110, compared to cash provided by operating activities of $135,383 during the six months ended July 5, 2015. The decrease in operating cash flows resulted primarily from the net effect of changes in working capital and other assets and liabilities and an $149,453 improvement in income from continuing operations. During the six months ended July 3, 2016, changes in working capital and other assets and liabilities used $201,694 of cash, composed of a $129,996 increase in net receivables, a $29,078 decrease in accrued compensation, a $28,273 decrease in contract loss reserve, a $26,762 increase in net inventories and a $46,098 change in other assets and liabilities, offset by a $37,323 decrease in income taxes receivable, a $12,237 increase in pension and other postretirement benefits and an $8,953 increase in accounts payable.
During the six months ended July 5, 2015, changes in working capital and other assets and liabilities used $22,674 of cash, composed of a $35,202 decrease in accrued compensation, a $26,625 decrease in contract loss reserve, a $22,130 decrease in accounts payable and a $48,115 change in other assets and liabilities, offset by a $37,369 decrease in income taxes receivable, a $34,578 decrease in net receivables, a $29,685 decrease in net inventories, and a $7,766 increase in pension and other postretirement benefits.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities of continuing operations during the six months ended July 3, 2016 was $60,562, compared to cash provided by investing activities during the six months ended July 5, 2015 of $365,227. Capital expenditures during the six months ended July 3, 2016 were $60,562, compared to $77,523 during the six months ended July 5, 2015. Cash provided by investing activities during the six months ended July 5, 2015 included $253,734 of cash acquired in the Merger with Orbital and a cash dividend of $188,878 received from Vista Outdoor in conjunction with the distribution of Sporting Group.
Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities during the six months ended July 3, 2016 was $53,796, compared to cash used in financing during the six months ended July 5, 2015 of $573,385. Cash used in financing during the six months ended July 3, 2016 consisted primarily of share purchases of $49,140 and cash dividends of $35,136, partially offset by net borrowings on our Senior Credit Facility of $30,000.
Cash used in financing activities during the six months ended July 5, 2015 consisted primarily of debt extinguishment payments of $372,758 and net payments on our Senior Credit Facility of $144,998 along with share purchases of $32,289 and cash dividends of $25,869.
Liquidity
In addition to our normal operating cash requirements, our principal future cash requirements will be to fund capital expenditures, repay debt, satisfy employee benefit obligations, repurchase shares, pay dividends and complete any strategic acquisitions. Our short-term cash requirements for operations are expected to consist mainly of capital expenditures to maintain and expand production facilities and working capital requirements. Our debt service requirements over the next two years consist of principal payments due under the Senior Credit Facility, as discussed further below. Our other debt service requirements consist of interest expense on our debt.
During the six months ended July 3, 2016, we paid dividends totaling $35,136. On August 2, 2016, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.30 per share payable on September 22, 2016 to holders of record on September 7, 2016. The payment and amount of any future dividends are at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be based on a number of factors, including our earnings, liquidity position, financial condition, capital requirements, credit ratings and the availability and cost of obtaining new debt. We cannot be certain that we will continue to declare dividends in the future and, as such, the amount and timing of any future dividends are not determinable.
Based on our current financial condition, we believe our cash position, combined with anticipated generation of cash flows, as well as the availability of funding, if needed, through our Senior Credit Facility, access to debt and equity markets, and potential future sources of funding such as additional bank financing and debt markets, will be adequate to fund future growth as well as service our anticipated long-term debt and pension obligations, make capital expenditures and pay dividends over the next 12 months.
We do not expect our access to liquidity sources will be materially impacted in the near future. There can be no assurance, however, that the cost or availability of future borrowings, if any, will not be materially impacted by capital market conditions.

37


Long-term Debt and Credit Facilities
As of July 3, 2016, we had outstanding total indebtedness of $1,520,000 and the potential of additional borrowings of up to $808,662 on our $1,000,000 Revolving Credit Facility, reduced for outstanding borrowings of $50,000 and letters of credit of $141,338.
Our indebtedness consisted of the following:
 
 
July 3, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Senior Credit Facility:
 
 
 
 
Term Loan A due 2020
 
$
770,000

 
$
790,000

Revolving Credit Facility due 2020
 
50,000

 

5.25% Senior Notes due 2021
 
300,000

 
300,000

5.50% Senior Notes due 2023
 
400,000

 
400,000

Principal amount of long-term debt
 
1,520,000

 
1,490,000

Unamortized debt issuance costs:
 
 
 
 
Senior Credit Facility
 
5,561

 
6,302

5.25% Senior Notes due 2021
 
1,750

 
1,915

5.50% Senior Notes due 2023
 
5,564

 
5,947

Unamortized debt issuance costs
 
12,875

 
14,164

Long-term debt less unamortized debt issuance costs
 
1,507,125

 
1,475,836

Less: Current portion of long-term debt
 
40,000

 
40,000

Long-term debt
 
$
1,467,125

 
$
1,435,836

See Note 12 "Long-term Debt" to the condensed consolidated financial statements in Part I, Item 1 for a detailed discussion of these borrowings.
Covenants
As of July 3, 2016, we were in compliance with all of the covenants in our debt agreements, including specified financial ratios that our Senior Credit Facility requires us to meet, as follows:
 
 
Total Leverage Ratio (1)
 
Interest Coverage Ratio (2)
Requirement
 
4.00

 
3.00

Actual at July 3, 2016
 
2.19

 
12.66

____________________________________________________________
(1) Not to exceed the required financial ratio.
(2) Not to be below the required financial ratio.
Total Leverage Ratio is the sum of our total debt plus financial letters of credit, net of up to $100,000 of cash, divided by Covenant EBITDA (which includes adjustments for items such as nonrecurring or extraordinary noncash items, noncash charges related to stock-based compensation, and intangible asset impairment charges, as well as inclusion of EBITDA of acquired companies on a pro forma basis) for the past four fiscal quarters.
See Note 12 "Long-term Debt" to the condensed consolidated financial statements in Part I, Item 1 for further discussion of the covenants in our debt agreements.
Our debt agreements contain cross-default provisions so that noncompliance with the covenants within one debt agreement could cause a default under other debt agreements as well. Our ability to comply with these covenants in the future and to meet and maintain the requisite financial ratios may be affected by events beyond our control.
Impact of the Restatement on Covenants
As a result of the Restatement, we were unable to timely file our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q with the SEC for the fiscal quarters ended July 3, 2016 and October 2, 2016 ("the 2016 Quarterly Reports"), as well as our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2016. We have entered into an extension agreement with our Senior Credit Facility lender group to extend, until April 14, 2017, the deadline under our credit agreement for filing with the SEC the 2016 Quarterly Reports, as well as an Amended Form

38


10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2016 and our Annual Report of Form 10-K for 2016. As a result of the extension, we are in compliance with our financial covenants as of the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q based on our restated financial results.
Share Repurchases
On March 11, 2015, our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase up to the lesser of $75 million or 1.0 million shares of our common stock through December 31, 2015. On August 4, 2015, the Board of Directors increased the amount authorized for repurchase to the lesser of $100,000 million or 1.4 million shares. On October 29, 2015, the Board of Directors increased the amount authorized for repurchase to the lesser of $250,000 million or 3.25 million shares through December 31, 2016. Under the authorized repurchase program, shares of our common stock may be purchased from time to time in the open market, subject to compliance with applicable laws and regulations and our debt covenants, depending upon market conditions and other factors. We purchased 194,003 shares for $16,839 and 528,104 shares for $44,241 during the quarter and six months ended July 3, 2016, respectively, and 328,841 shares for $24,502 during the quarter and six months ended July 5, 2015.
In accordance with the Transaction Agreement entered into on April 28, 2014, we did not repurchase any outstanding shares prior to the closing of the Distribution and Merger during the quarter ended March 31, 2015.
Authorized repurchases of our shares are subject to market conditions, our compliance with our debt covenants and the limitations imposed by the tax treatment of the Distribution and the related Tax Matters Agreement between us and Vista Outdoor. Our 5.25% Notes and 5.50% Notes limit the aggregate sum of dividends, share repurchases, and other designated restricted payments to an amount based on our net income, stock issuance proceeds, and certain other items since April 1, 2001, less restricted payments made since that date. As of July 3, 2016, the Senior Credit Facility allows us to make unlimited "restricted payments" (as defined in the Credit Agreement), which, among other items, allows payments for future share repurchases, as long as we maintain a certain amount of liquidity and maintain certain senior secured debt limits. When those requirements are not met, the limit is equal to $250,000 plus proceeds of any equity issuances plus 50% of net income since October 7, 2010. The Credit Agreement also prohibits dividend payments if loan defaults exist or the financial covenants contained in the agreement are not met.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
There have been no material changes with respect to the contractual obligations and commitments or off-balance sheet arrangements described in our Form 10-K/A.
Contingencies
Environmental Liabilities.  Our operations and ownership or use of real property are subject to a number of federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations, as well as applicable foreign laws and regulations, including those for discharge of hazardous materials, remediation of contaminated sites and restoration of damage to the environment. At certain sites that we own or operate or formerly owned or operated, there is known or potential contamination that we are required to investigate or remediate. We could incur substantial costs, including remediation costs, resource restoration costs, fines, and penalties, or third party property damage or personal injury claims, as a result of liabilities associated with past practices or violations of environmental laws or noncompliance with environmental permits.
The liability for environmental remediation represents management's best estimate of the present value of the probable and reasonably estimable costs related to known remediation obligations. The receivable represents the present value of the amount that we expect to recover, as discussed below. Both the liability and receivable have been discounted to reflect the present value of the expected future cash flows, using a discount rate of 0.3% and 0.7% as of July 3, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Our discount rate is calculated using the 20-year Treasury constant maturities rate, net of an estimated inflationary factor of 1.9%, rounded to the nearest quarter percent.
The following is a summary of the amounts recorded for environmental remediation:
 
 
July 3, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
Liability
 
Receivable
 
Liability
 
Receivable
Amounts (payable) receivable
 
$
(43,463
)
 
$
19,681

 
$
(41,824
)
 
$
18,236

Unamortized discount
 
740

 
(256
)
 
1,718

 
(568
)
Present value amounts (payable) receivable
 
$
(42,723
)
 
$
19,425

 
$
(40,106
)
 
$
17,668

As of July 3, 2016, the estimated discounted range of reasonably possible costs of environmental remediation was $42,723 to $80,899.

39


We expect that a portion of our environmental compliance and remediation costs will be recoverable under U.S. Government contracts. Some of the remediation costs that are not recoverable from the U.S. Government that are associated with facilities purchased in a business acquisition are covered by various indemnification agreements, as described in Note 14 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-K/A.
We have been identified as a potentially responsible party ("PRP"), along with other parties, in several regulatory agency actions associated with hazardous waste sites. As a PRP, we may be required to pay a share of the costs of the investigation and clean-up of these sites. While uncertainties exist with respect to the amounts and timing of the ultimate environmental liabilities, based on currently available information, we have concluded that these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition or cash flows.
Other Contingencies. We are also subject to a number of other potential risks and contingencies. These risks and contingencies are described in Item 1A of Part I of our Form 10-K/A.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report.
Inflation
In management's opinion, inflation has not had a significant impact upon the results of our operations. The selling prices under contracts, the majority of which are long-term, generally include estimated costs to be incurred in future periods. These cost projections can generally be negotiated into fixed-price government and commercial contracts, while actual cost increases are recoverable on cost-type contracts.
ITEM 3.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There were no material changes in our market risk during the quarter ended July 3, 2016. For additional information, refer to Item 7A of Part II of our Form 10-K/A for the nine-month transition period ended December 31, 2015.
ITEM 4.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Internal Investigation
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, in consultation with senior management, determined that the Company should conduct an internal investigation, under its supervision, of the circumstances surrounding the misstatements in the accounting for the Lake City Contract and related matters. The investigation was undertaken by outside counsel, along with independent counsel for the Audit Committee. Counsel received assistance from outside forensic accountants. As disclosed in the Form 10-K/A, the investigation was previously completed.
Based on the internal investigation, the Audit Committee and senior management concluded as follows: Certain personnel at the Small Caliber Systems Division and, in some cases, Defense Systems Group, acted inappropriately and failed to adhere to the high standards established in the Company’s policies and expected by senior management and the Board of Directors. Specifically, with respect to the Lake City Contract: (a) there likely was a bias toward maintaining a targeted profit rate; (b) in some cases, there appears to have been inappropriate use of management reserves to maintain the targeted profit rate; (c) some members of the Small Caliber Systems Division finance staff failed to follow up and inquire further into indicators that cost overruns were occurring, and if such inquiries had been made, it could have led to further contemporaneous discussion and an earlier conclusion that the Lake City Contract was in a forward loss position; and (d) negative information was suppressed, and concerns at the Small Caliber Systems Division about cost overruns were not escalated appropriately to higher-level Company management or finance staff, nor were they communicated to the Audit Committee, the Board of Directors or the independent registered public accounting firms. The Lake City Contract is in a forward loss position, which means that it will result in a net loss over its total contract life. In addition to the investigation findings above, the Company’s identification of the forward loss was also delayed by a number of other factors which obscured the actual performance of the Lake City Contract, including migration to a new plant-wide software system at LCAAP, the unionization of employees at the LCAAP, and other factors. In response to the findings of the internal investigation, the Company has taken and will continue to take significant and comprehensive remedial actions which are described below under “Remediation Efforts to Address Material Weaknesses.
As described in Note 3, “Restatement,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements contained in Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements, in this Form 10-Q, we have restated our consolidated financial statements for the quarterly period ended July 5, 2015.
In view of the Restatement, management conducted a comprehensive and intensive review of all relevant material contracts throughout the Company. No material adjustment to the accounting for any of these contracts was required as a result of this review, nor were any circumstances similar to those at the Small Caliber Systems Division discovered.

40


Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of July 3, 2016, management of the Company, with the participation of its CEO and CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. We previously identified and disclosed material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. Management identified material weaknesses in our control environment related to (i) establishing and maintaining accounting policies and procedures related to complex transactions; and (ii) maintaining a sufficient complement of personnel with appropriate levels of accounting and controls knowledge, experience and training commensurate with the nature and complexity of our business and contract activity.
These material weaknesses in our control environment contributed to material weaknesses at the control activity level where we (iii) did not design appropriate controls to ensure completeness and accuracy of purchase accounting, specifically we did not maintain controls over measurement period adjustments and controls over the calculation of acquired contracts’ percentage of completion used to recognize revenue. In addition we (iv) did not maintain controls over the integration of accounting operations of the two merged companies and over the preparation, analysis and review of accounts of the combined business.
Also, (v) the Company did not maintain an effective control environment at our Defense Systems Group and its Small Caliber Systems Division. Specifically, the Small Caliber Systems Division did not maintain a control environment where procedures to escalate accounting issues to Defense Systems Group or Corporate management were followed, which led to the suppression of information by Small Caliber Systems Division management related to cost overruns and the override of certain controls due to pressure to achieve cost savings and maintain a targeted profit rate. This material weakness contributed to (vi) a material weakness at the Small Caliber Systems Division where the Small Caliber Systems Division did not design and maintain controls related to the preparation, review and approval of costs incurred and contract estimates used to determine revenue.
As a result of these material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, which were not remediated as of July 3, 2016, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of July 3, 2016.
Remediation Efforts to Address Material Weaknesses
The Board of Directors and management are fully committed to maintaining a strong internal control environment. The Company has taken and will continue to take significant and comprehensive remedial actions in response to the conduct and other factors that led to the Restatement, including actions to begin to remediate the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting.

We are performing an enterprise-wide controls improvement program for evaluation of controls across all significant locations utilizing a risk-based approach. We combined the two legacy companies’ controls frameworks and validated that where a risk of a material misstatement existed, key controls were identified to address the risk. In addition, we have taken meaningful steps to implement a number of key controls and processes to increase the oversight of the Company’s multiple businesses. We have taken the following specific remediation initiatives in response to the material weaknesses:

Control Environment
We evaluated our accounting organization and augmented our team with additional professionals with the appropriate levels of accounting and controls knowledge, experience and training. Our evaluation included benchmarking key accounting functions and resulted in the identification of a number of areas where the team needed to be augmented. As a result of this evaluation, we have hired 11 additional accounting and controls professionals in key areas of technical accounting, general accounting oversight, business unit accounting, external reporting and controls. Each of these 11 new professionals is a CPA and 9 of the 11 have experience with a “Big 4” accounting firm. We will continue to evaluate our accounting organization and augment the team as appropriate.
We revised our accounting policy for loss contracts to include general and administrative costs in the measurement of loss contracts.
We designed an enterprise-wide process to timely identify, track and appropriately resolve and conclude on complex transactions and disclosures.
Certain Small Caliber Systems Division personnel responsible for the inappropriate behaviors described under “Internal Investigation” above are no longer employed by the Company. In addition, certain members of the Defense Systems Group leadership will receive appropriate training, adverse compensation action and additional supervision.
Additional accounting, controls and financial reporting personnel have been added to the Small Caliber Systems Division to take responsibility for its financial data forming part of the basis for preparation of these consolidated financial statements.
We are increasing communication and training to employees regarding internal control over financial reporting, disclosure controls and procedures, and emphasizing the importance of adherence to our policies and procedures.


41


Control Activity- Level
We redesigned, developed and implemented processes and controls over the execution of purchase accounting.
We revised our account reconciliation policy and controls, including the timing of reconciliations, thresholds for review and the process for resolving reconciling items. We continue to monitor the reconciliation control execution and will make further changes as necessary. In addition, we implemented an enhanced company-wide balance sheet review process to perform a more detailed analysis of accounts, including balance composition, fluctuation and trend analysis, which is performed at a segment level.
We completed a detailed review of the Lake City Contract and the underlying estimates for its percentage of completion revenue recognition accounting model and developed extensive analysis and procedures to develop our management estimates going forward.
We are designing and implementing enhancements to the internal controls related to the reconciliation and analysis of unbilled accounts receivable.

We believe the remediation steps outlined above have improved and will continue to improve the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. While we have made meaningful progress on strengthening our internal controls relative to material weaknesses (i), (ii), and (iv), we have not fully tested all our remediation actions to verify the effectiveness of their design or operation. While we have taken measures to strengthen our internal controls related to material weaknesses (v) and (vi), which were identified beginning in February 2017, we have not fully completed our assessment of these additional controls.

Regarding material weakness (iii), which was identified as a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, we have subsequently concluded that the Company completed the design and implementation of new purchase accounting controls, which have subsequently remediated material weakness (iii) during the quarter ended December 31, 2016.

The Board of Directors and management believe that the Company’s remediation actions will provide an appropriate control environment going forward once the material weaknesses disclosed herein are remediated and other actions described herein have been taken.

As our management continues to evaluate and work to improve our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, we may determine to take additional measures to address these deficiencies or determine to modify certain of the remediation measures described above.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended July 3, 2016 there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.


42


PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, we are subject to various legal proceedings, including lawsuits, which arise out of, and are incidental to, the conduct of our business. We do not consider any of such proceedings that are currently pending, individually or in the aggregate, notwithstanding that the unfavorable resolution of any matter may have a material effect on our net earnings in any particular quarter, to be material to our business or likely to result in a material adverse effect on our future operating results, financial condition or cash flows.
Securities Class Action.    On August 12, 2016, a putative class action complaint, naming the Company, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer as defendants, was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Steven Knurr, et al. v. Orbital ATK, Inc., No. 16-cv-01031 (TSE-MSN)). The class action complaint asserts claims on behalf of purchasers of Orbital ATK securities for violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, arising out of allegedly false and misleading statements and the failure to disclose that: (i) the Company lacked effective control over financial reporting; and (ii) as a result, the Company failed to record an anticipated loss on its long-term contract with the U.S. Army to manufacture and supply small caliber ammunition at the U.S. Army’s Lake City Army Ammunition Plant. The complaint seeks a determination that this matter is a proper class action and certifying the plaintiff as the class representative, an award of damages, an award of reasonable costs and expenses of trial, including counsel and expert fees, and an award of such other relief as deemed appropriate by the Court. The Company intends to defend this action vigorously.
SEC Investigation.    The SEC is conducting a non-public investigation relating to our historical accounting practices as a result of the prior restatement of the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarterly periods ended July 5, 2015 and October 4, 2015 described in the original filing, and the Company also has voluntarily self-reported to the SEC regarding matters pertaining to the Restatement described in this Form 10-Q/A. The Company is cooperating fully with the SEC in connection with these matters.
U.S. Government Investigations.    We are also subject to U.S. Government investigations from which civil, criminal or administrative proceedings could result. Such proceedings could involve claims by the U.S. Government for fines, penalties, compensatory and treble damages, restitution and/or forfeitures. Under government regulations, a company, or one or more of its operating divisions or subdivisions, can also be suspended or debarred from government contracts, or lose its export privileges, based on the results of investigations. We believe, based upon all available information, that the outcome of any such pending government investigations will not have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition or cash flows.
Environmental Liabilities.    Our operations and ownership or use of real property are subject to a number of federal, state, and local laws and regulations, including those for discharge of hazardous materials, remediation of contaminated sites, and restoration of damage to the environment. Due in part to their complexity and pervasiveness, such laws and regulations have resulted in our company being involved with a number of related legal proceedings, claims and remediation obligations. We routinely assess, based on in-depth studies, expert analyses and legal reviews, our contingencies, obligations, and commitments for remediation of contaminated sites and past practices, including assessments of ranges and probabilities of recoveries from other responsible parties. Our policy is to accrue and charge to expense in the current period any identified exposures related to environmental liabilities based on estimates of investigation, cleanup, monitoring and resource restoration costs to be incurred.
We have been identified as a potentially responsible party ("PRP"), along with other parties, in several regulatory agency actions associated with hazardous waste sites. As a PRP, we may be required to pay a share of the costs of the investigation and clean-up of these sites. While uncertainties exist with respect to the amounts and timing of the ultimate environmental liabilities, based on currently available information, we have concluded that these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition or cash flows.
We could incur substantial costs, including cleanup costs, resource restoration, fines, and penalties or third-party property damage or personal injury claims, as a result of violations or liabilities under environmental laws or noncompliance with environmental permits. While environmental laws and regulations have not had a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition or cash flows in the past, and we have environmental management programs in place to mitigate these risks, it is difficult to predict whether they will have a material impact in the future.
The description of certain environmental matters contained in Part I, Item 2, "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" under the heading "Contingencies," is incorporated herein by reference.


43


ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS
While our attempts to identify, manage and mitigate risks and uncertainties associated with our business to the extent practical under the circumstances, some level of risk and uncertainty will always be present. Item 1A of Part I of our Form 10-K/A for the nine-month transition period ended December 31, 2015 describes all known material risks and uncertainties associated with our business. These risks and uncertainties have the potential to materially affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, projected results and future prospects.

ITEM 2.   UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Period
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased (1)
 
Average
Price Paid
per Share
 
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Program (2)
 
Maximum
Number of
Shares that
May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Program (3)
April 4 - May 1
54,388

 
$
86.42

 
54,122

 
 

May 2 - May 29
73,549

 
86.83

 
50,713

 
 

May 30 - July 3
89,413

 
87.15

 
89,168

 
 

Quarter ended July 3, 2016
217,350

 
86.86

 
194,003

 
1,527,369

____________________________________________________________

(1) 
The 217,350 shares purchased include shares purchased during the quarter (see (2) below) and shares withheld to pay taxes upon vesting of shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units or payment of performance shares that were granted under our incentive compensation plans.

(2) 
During 2015, the Board approved a stock repurchase program that currently authorizes the repurchase of up to the lesser of $250,000 million or 3.25 million shares through December 31, 2016. We repurchased 194,003 shares for $16,839 during the quarter ended July 3, 2016.

(3) 
The maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the program was calculated using the Orbital ATK closing stock price of $85.09 on July 1, 2016.
The discussion of limitations upon the payment of dividends as a result of the indentures governing our debt instruments as discussed in Part I, Item 2, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" under the heading "Long-term Debt and Credit Facilities," is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 3.     DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable.
ITEM 4.   MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
ITEM 5.   OTHER INFORMATION
None.

44


ITEM 6.   EXHIBITS
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Exhibit (and document from which incorporated by reference, if applicable)
 
 
 
 
 
3(ii).1
 
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, Effective May 3, 2016 (Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K dated May 3, 2016).
 
 
 
 
 
10.1
 
Orbital ATK, Inc. Executive Officer Incentive Plan (Effective as of May 4, 2016) (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated May 3, 2016).
 
 
 
 
 
31.1
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
 
 
 
 
 
31.2
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
 
 
 
 
 
32
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
 
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document.
 
 
 
 
 
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
 
 
 
 
 
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
 
 
 
 
 
101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document.
 
 
 
 
 
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
 
 
 
 
 
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

45


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
ORBITAL ATK, INC.
April 4, 2017
By:
 
/s/ David W. Thompson
 
Name:
 
David W. Thompson
 
Title:
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
(duly authorized and principal executive officer)
 
 
 
 
April 4, 2017
By:
 
/s/ Garrett E. Pierce
 
Name:
 
Garrett E. Pierce
 
Title:
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
(principal financial officer)
 
 
 
 


46