West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. - FORM 10-K

Attached files

file	filename
EX-32 - EXHIBIT 32 - West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.	t1700193_ex32-1.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.	t1700193_ex31-2.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.	t1700193_ex31-1.htm
EX-23 - EXHIBIT 23 - West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.	t1700193_ex23.htm
EX-21 - EXHIBIT 21 - West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.	t1700193_ex21.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal ended December 31, 2016.

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________ to _______________.

Commission file number: 001-54578

WEST END INDIANA BANCSHARES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland

36-4713616

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

34 South 7th Street, Richmond, Indiana		47374
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (765) 962-9587

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

(Title of each class to be registered)

(Name of each exchange on which

each class is to be registered)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES ¨ NO x

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. YES ¨ NO x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨	Smaller reporting company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES ¨ NO x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, computed by reference to the last sale price on June 30, 2016 ($24.75) was approximately $21.1 million.

As of March 30, 2017, there were 1,066,870 issued and outstanding shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

(1) Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Registrant (Part III).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 1.	Business	2

ITEM 1A.	Risk Factors	40

ITEM 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	41

ITEM 2.	Properties	41

ITEM 3.	Legal Proceedings	42

ITEM 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.	42

ITEM 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	42

ITEM 6.	Selected Financial Data	43

ITEM 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	43

ITEM 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	55

ITEM 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	56

ITEM 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	57

ITEM 9A	Controls and Procedures	57

ITEM 9B.	Other Information	58

ITEM 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	58

ITEM 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	59

ITEM 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence	59

ITEM 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	59

ITEM 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	59

ITEM 16.	FORM 10-K SUMMARY	60

PART I

ITEM 1. Business

This annual report contains forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use of words such as “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “seek,” “expect,” “will,” “may” and words of similar meaning. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

statements of our goals, intentions and expectations;

statements regarding our business plans, prospects, growth and operating strategies;

statements regarding the asset quality of our loan and investment portfolios; and

estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits.

These forward-looking statements are based on our current beliefs and expectations and are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change. We are under no duty to and do not take any obligation to update any forward-looking statements after the date of this annual report.

The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements:

general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas, that are worse than expected;

competition among depository and other financial institutions;

our success in continuing to emphasize consumer lending, including indirect automobile lending;

our ability to improve our asset quality even as we increase our non-residential lending;

our success in maintaining our commercial and multi-family real estate and our non-owner occupied one- to four-family residential real estate and commercial business lending;

changes in the interest rate environment that reduce our margins or reduce the fair value of our financial instruments;

adverse changes in the securities markets;

changes in laws or government regulations or policies affecting financial institutions, including changes in deposit insurance premiums, regulatory fees and capital requirements, which increase our compliance costs;

our ability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth opportunities;

changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;

changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the bank regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board;

changes in our organization, compensation and benefit plans;

loan delinquencies and changes in the underlying cash flows of our borrowers;

changes in our financial condition or results of operations that reduce capital available to pay dividends; and

changes in the financial condition or future prospects of issuers of securities that we own.

Because of these and a wide variety of other uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements.

General

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. was incorporated in the State of Maryland in June 2011 for the purpose of becoming the savings and loan holding company for West End Bank, S.B. (the “Bank”), upon consummation of the mutual to stock conversion of West End Bank, MHC, the Bank’s former mutual holding company, which occurred on January 10, 2012. Other than owning the Bank and making a loan to the Bank’s employee stock ownership plan, the Company has engaged in no material operations to date.

As a registered savings and loan holding company, West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. is authorized to pursue other business activities permitted by applicable laws and regulations, which may include the acquisition of banking and financial services companies. See “Supervision and Regulation –Holding Company Regulation” for a discussion of the activities that are permitted for savings and loan holding companies. We currently have no understandings or agreements to acquire other financial institutions although we may determine to do so in the future. We may also borrow funds for reinvestment in West End Bank, S.B.

West End Bank, S.B.

West End Bank, S.B. is an Indiana-chartered savings bank headquartered in Richmond, Indiana. West End Bank, S.B. was organized in 1894 under the name West End Building and Loan Association and has operated continuously in Richmond, Indiana since its founding. We reorganized into the mutual holding company structure in 2007 by forming West End Bank, MHC; and completed our mutual to stock conversion in January 2012, thereby becoming the wholly owned subsidiary of West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. At December 31, 2016, we had total assets of $287.1 million, net loans of $232.6 million, total deposits of $224.9 million and equity of $28.2 million.

Our principal business consists of attracting retail deposits from the general public in our market area and investing those deposits, together with funds generated from operations, and to a lesser extent, borrowings, in one- to four-family residential real estate loans, indirect automobile loans, commercial and multi-family real estate loans, and, to a lesser extent, second mortgages and equity lines of credit, construction loans and commercial business loans. We also purchase investment securities consisting primarily of securities issued by United States Government agencies and government-sponsored entities and mortgage-backed securities.

West End Bank is a community bank with a broadened base of financial products and services while continuing to emphasize superior customer service associated with our traditional thrift focus. Residential real estate lending has and will remain an important part of our operations, however, we have also expanded our focus into non-residential lending, including in particular indirect automobile lending. Our consumer lending business lines and our interest rate risk strategies (such as selling most of the fixed-rate one- to four-family residential real estate loans that we originate) have allowed us to continue to grow and remain profitable despite the challenging economy and interest rate environment of recent years and increasing regulatory burden placed on all financial institutions.

Our website address is www.westendbank.com. Information on this website should not be considered a part of this annual report.

Market Area and Competition

We primarily conduct business through our main office located in Richmond, Indiana and our three branch offices in Richmond, Hagerstown and Liberty, Indiana. Three of our offices are located in Wayne County, Indiana and our Liberty office is located in Union County, Indiana. Richmond, Indiana is located in east/central Indiana on the Interstate 70 corridor, approximately 70 miles east of Indianapolis, Indiana and 35 miles west of Dayton, Ohio. In addition to our four full-service locations, we also host seven additional limited service branches in select schools within Richmond Community Schools. These student-operated branches are currently featured in all six Richmond Community Elementary Schools and are in operation once a month. We also have a limited service branch and ATM located within Richmond High School. This student-operated branch is available to students and faculty of RCS twice a week.

Our primary market area consists of Union and Wayne Counties, Indiana, and select parts of Butler County Ohio with respect to commercial and multi-family real estate lending, and to a lesser extent, indirect automobile lending. This area includes small towns and rural communities. Our market area was historically a manufacturing and agricultural-based economy. In recent years, the economy has transitioned into a more service-oriented base, including health care, educational facilities and distribution services. Most notable, Wayne County is home to Reid Health and three universities; Earlham College, Indiana University East and Ivy Tech Community College.

The regional economy is fairly diversified, with services, wholesale/retail trade, manufacturing and government providing the primary support for the area economy. The population of Wayne County decreased slightly from 69,003 in 2010 to 67,001 in 2015 which is a decrease of 2.9%. The population of Union County decreased slightly from 7,516 in 2010 to 7,182 in 2015 which is a decrease of 4.4% (Stats Indiana.) Our lack of population growth and our general market conditions may limit our ability to grow our assets and liabilities at a rapid rate. To counter this, in addition to our traditional means of advertising, we have also employed digital channels most specifically but not limited to social media. In addition, we are implementing strategies to optimize search engine capabilities. Our school branch initiative enhances our ability to attract smaller deposit relationships, nurture them and in turn grow our brand awareness with a younger generation of potential customers. We also specialize in offering a superior suite of products, services and customer service to small and mid-sized companies in our market area.

Wayne and Union Counties’ and Indiana’s annual unemployment rates for 2015 were 5.3%, 4.4% and 4.8%, respectively, as compared to a U.S. unemployment rate of 5.4%. This was an overall decrease from 2014. 2015 per capita personal incomes for Wayne and Union Counties were $36,494 and $33,714, respectively, and 2015 median household incomes for these counties were $41,849 and $45,050 compared to 2015 per capita income for the state of Indiana and the United States of $41,940 and $47,669 respectively, and 2015 median household incomes of $50,510 and $55,775, respectively (StatsIndiana and BEA.)

We face competition within our market area both in making loans and attracting deposits. Our market area has a concentration of financial institutions that include large regional banks, community banks and credit unions. As of June 30, 2016, based on the most recent available FDIC data, our market share of deposits represented 17.07% and 29.94% of FDIC-insured deposits in Wayne and Union Counties, Indiana, respectively.

Lending Activities

Our principal lending activity is originating one- to four-family residential real estate loans, indirect automobile loans, commercial and multi-family real estate loans, second mortgages and equity lines of credit, construction loans and commercial business loans. In recent years, we have increased and expect to continue to increase, our indirect automobile loans and our commercial business loans, which serves to strengthen the overall yield earned on our loans and shorten asset duration. As a long-standing community lender, we believe we can effectively compete for this business by emphasizing superior customer service and local underwriting, which we believe differentiates us from larger commercial banks in our primary market area.

Loan Portfolio Composition. The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio by type of loan at the dates indicated.

	At December 31,
	2016					2015					2014					2013					2012
	Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent
	(Dollars in thousands)

Real estate loans:
One- to four-family residential ⁽¹⁾	$	65,160		27.72	%	$	60,968		27.67	%	$	61,886		31.86	%	$	60,960		35.06	%	$	56,145		34.72	%
Commercial and multi-family		50,070		21.30			47,721		21.66			39,492		20.33			35,915		20.66			34,048		21.06
Construction		6,906		2.94			3,475		1.58			4,365		2.25			1,475		0.85			2,483		1.54
Second mortgages and equity lines of credit		5,716		2.44			5,521		2.51			4,625		2.38			4,372		2.51			4,114		2.54
Consumer loans:
Indirect		79,214		33.70			73,166		33.21			60,094		30.93			50,829		29.23			46,930		29.03
Other		15,821		6.73			15,390		6.98			13,516		6.96			11,208		6.45			9,464		5.85
Commercial business		12,155		5.17			14,076		6.39			10,280		5.29			9,114		5.24			8,505		5.26
		235,042		100.00	%		220,317		100.00	%		194,258		100.00	%		173,873		100.00	%		161,689		100.00	%
Less:
Net deferred loan fees, premiums and discounts		116					115					119					122					105
Allowance for losses		2,277					2,193					1,944					2,398					2,013
Total loans	$	232,649				$	218,009				$	192,195				$	171,353				$	159,571

(1)

At December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013, and December 31, 2012 included non-owner occupied loans of $11.7 million, $11.6 million, $12.8 million, $11.0 million, $11.9 million, respectively.

Contractual Maturities. The following table sets forth the contractual maturities of our total loan portfolio at December 31, 2016. Demand loans, loans having no stated repayment schedule or maturity, and overdraft loans are reported as being due in one year or less. The table presents contractual maturities and does not reflect repricing or the effect of prepayments. Actual maturities may differ.

December 31, 2016	One- to Four- Family		Second Mortgage and Lines of Credit		Commercial and Multi-Family Real Estate		Construction		Commercial Business		Consumer		Total
	(In thousands)
Amounts due in:
One year or less	$	848	$	1,259	$	3,832	$	1,476	$	5,539	$	1,945	$	14,899
More than one to two years		506		413		2,185		––		491		6,397		9,992
More than two to three years		207		536		4,795		––		691		13,386		19,615
More than three to five years		764		1,874		4,913		799		3,148		48,345		59,843
More than five to ten years		5,396		1,481		9,913		1,336		1,777		22,961		42,864
More than ten to fifteen years		15,960		131		14,421		––		233		1,841		32,586
More than fifteen years		41,479		22		10,011		3,295		276		160		55,243
Total	$	65,160	$	5,716	$	50,070	$	6,906	$	12,155	$	95,035	$	235,042

The following table sets forth our fixed and adjustable-rate loans at December 31, 2016 that are contractually due after December 31, 2017.

	Due After December 31, 2017
	Fixed		Adjustable		Total
	(In thousands)
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family residential	$	48,476	$	15,836	$	64,312
Commercial and multi-family		24,987		21,251		46,238
Construction		1,947		3,483		5,430
Second mortgages and equity lines of credit		3,011		1,446		4,457
Consumer Loans & Other		93,090		-		93,090
Commercial Business		6,159		457		6,616
Total loans	$	177,670	$	42,473	$	220,143

Loan Approval Procedures and Authority. Pursuant to applicable law, the aggregate amount of loans that we are permitted to make to any one borrower or a group of related borrowers is generally limited to 15% of West End Bank, S.B.’s unimpaired capital and surplus (25% if the amount in excess of 15% is secured by “readily marketable collateral” or 30% for certain residential development loans). At December 31, 2016, our largest credit totaled $3.90 million and was secured by commercial real estate, and inventory which was performing in accordance with its repayment terms at this date. Our second largest at this date was approximately the same at $3.89 million loan secured primarily by real estate used for student housing and accounts/notes receivable and inventory. At December 31, 2016, this loan was performing in accordance with its repayment terms.

Our lending is subject to written underwriting standards and origination procedures. Decisions on loan applications are made on the basis of detailed applications submitted by the prospective borrower and property valuations (consistent with our appraisal policy) prepared by outside independent licensed appraisers approved by our board of directors as well as internal evaluations, where permitted by regulations. The loan applications are designed primarily to determine the borrower’s ability to repay the requested loan, and the more significant items on the application are verified through use of credit reports, financial statements and tax returns.

Our President and Chief Executive Officer has approval authority of up to $750,000 for one- to four-family residential real estate loans, commercial and multi-family loans and commercial business loans, and up to $100,000 for unsecured consumer loans. Our Senior Vice President and Credit Manager has approval authority of up to $250,000 for one- to four-family residential real estate loans, commercial and multi-family loans and commercial business loans, and up to $25,000 for unsecured consumer loans. Loans above the amounts authorized to our President and Chief Executive Officer require approval by the Loan Committee, which consists of our President and Chief Executive Officer, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and three outside board members, which may approve loans of up to $1,500,000. These approvals are reported at the next board meeting following approval. Aggregate credit exposure in excess of $1,500,000 must be approved by a majority of the full Board of Directors.

Generally, we require title insurance on our mortgage loans as well as fire and extended coverage casualty insurance in amounts at least equal to the principal amount of the loan or the value of improvements on the property, depending on the type of loan. We also require flood insurance if the improved property is determined to be in a flood zone area.

One- to Four-Family Residential Real Estate Lending. The focus of our lending program has historically been the origination of one- to four-family residential real estate loans. At December 31, 2016, $65.2 million, or 27.7% of our total loan portfolio, consisted of loans secured by one- to four-family real estate.

We originate both fixed-rate and adjustable-rate one- to four-family residential real estate loans. At December 31, 2016, 75.4% of our one- to four-family residential real estate loans were fixed-rate loans, and 24.6% of such loans were adjustable-rate loans.

At December 31, 2016, $11.7 million, or 18.0% of our total one- to four-family residential real estate loans were secured by non-owner occupied properties. Generally, we require personal guarantees from the borrowers on these properties and will not make loans in excess of 80% loan to value on non-owner- occupied properties. However, we recognize that there is a greater credit risk inherent in non-owner- occupied properties, than in owner-occupied properties since, like commercial real estate and multi-family loans, the repayment of these loans may depend, in part, on the successful management of the property and/or the borrower’s ability to lease the property. A downturn in the real estate market or the local economy could adversely affect the value of properties securing these loans or the revenues derived from these properties which could affect the borrower’s ability to repay the loan.

Our fixed-rate one- to four-family residential real estate loans are generally underwritten according to Freddie Mac guidelines, and we refer to loans that conform to such guidelines as “conforming loans.” We generally originate both fixed- and adjustable-rate mortgage loans in amounts up to the maximum conforming loan limits as established by the Federal Housing Finance Agency for Freddie Mac, which as of December 31, 2016 was generally $417,000 for single-family homes in our market area. We also originate loans above the lending limit for conforming loans, which are referred to as “jumbo loans.” The majority of our one- to four-family residential real estate loans are secured by properties located in our market area.

We generally limit the loan-to-value ratios of our mortgage loans to 80% of the sales price or appraised value, whichever is lower. Loans with certain credit enhancements, such as private mortgage insurance, may be made with loan-to-value ratios up to 97%.

Our fixed-rate one- to four-family residential real estate loans typically have terms of 15 or 30 years.

Our adjustable-rate one- to four-family residential real estate loans generally have fixed rates for initial terms of five years, and adjust annually thereafter at a margin, which in recent years has been 4.50% over the weekly average yield on U.S. treasury securities adjusted to a constant maturity of one year. The maximum amount by which the interest rate may be increased or decreased is generally 2% per adjustment period and the lifetime interest rate cap is generally 6% over the initial interest rate of the loan. Our adjustable-rate loans carry terms to maturity of up to 30 years.

Although adjustable-rate mortgage loans may reduce to an extent our vulnerability to changes in market interest rates because they periodically reprice, as interest rates increase the required payments due from the borrower also increase (subject to rate caps), increasing the potential for default by the borrower. At the same time, the ability of the borrower to repay the loan and the marketability of the underlying collateral may be adversely affected by higher interest rates. Upward adjustments of the contractual interest rate are also limited by the maximum periodic and lifetime rate adjustments permitted by our loan documents. Moreover, the interest rates on most of our adjustable-rate loans do not adjust for up to five years after origination. As a result, the effectiveness of adjustable-rate mortgage loans in compensating for changes in general interest rates may be limited during periods of rapidly rising interest rates.

We do not offer “interest only” mortgage loans on permanent one- to four-family residential real estate loans (where the borrower pays interest for an initial period, after which the loan converts to a fully amortizing loan). We also do not offer loans that provide for negative amortization of principal, such as “Option ARM” loans, where the borrower can pay less than the interest owed on the loan, resulting in an increased principal balance during the life of the loan. We do not offer “subprime loans” on one-to four- family residential real estate loans (i.e., loans that generally target borrowers with weakened credit histories typically characterized by payment delinquencies, previous charge-offs, judgments, bankruptcies, or borrowers with questionable repayment capacity as evidenced by low credit scores or high debt-burden ratios), or “Alt-A” (i.e., loans that generally target borrowers with better credit scores who borrow with alternative documentation such as little or no verification of income).

We actively monitor our interest rate risk position to determine the desirable level of investment in fixed-rate mortgages. Depending on market interest rates and our capital and liquidity position, we may retain all of our newly originated longer-term fixed-rate residential mortgage loans, or we may sell all or a portion of such loans in the secondary mortgage market. In recent years, we have sold, and may continue to sell, subject to market conditions, most of the conforming fixed-rate one- to four-family residential real estate loans that we originate to Freddie Mac, with servicing retained.

At December 31, 2016, the balance of real estate owned included $103,000 of foreclosed residential real estate properties recorded as a result of obtaining physical possession of the property.

Commercial and Multi-Family Real Estate Lending. Consistent with our strategy to expand our loan products and to enhance the yield and reduce the term to maturity of our loan portfolio, we have increased our commercial and multi-family real estate loans in recent years. At December 31, 2016, we had $50.1 million in commercial and multi-family real estate loans, representing 21.3% of our total loan portfolio. Subject to future economic, market and regulatory conditions, we intend to continue to focus on this kind of lending, and may increase our loan activity for these types of loans in western Ohio.

Most of our commercial and multi-family real estate loans have fixed-rate terms of up to five years with amortization terms of 25 years. The maximum loan-to-value ratio of our commercial real estate loans is generally 80%.

Set forth below is information regarding our commercial and multi-family real estate loans at December 31, 2016.

Type of Loan	Number of Loans		Balance
			(Dollars in thousands)

Retail		15	$	2,416
Office		13		1,210
Industrial		4		849
Mixed use		6		2,749
Church		11		3,846
Real estate investors/lessors		80		12,475
Student housing		12		11,983
Recreation/entertainment		6		1,879
Commercial development		8		1,755
Auto sales/repair		11		1,992
Restaurant/fast food		8		1,386
Hotel		4		4,087
Other		14		3,443
Total		192	$	50,070

We consider a number of factors in originating commercial and multi-family real estate loans. We evaluate the qualifications and financial condition of the borrower, including credit history, profitability and expertise, as well as the value and condition of the property securing the loan. When evaluating the qualifications of the borrower, we consider the financial resources of the borrower, the borrower’s experience in owning or managing similar property and the borrower’s payment history with us and other financial institutions. In evaluating the property securing the loan, the factors we consider include the net operating income of the mortgaged property before debt service and depreciation, the ratio of the loan amount to the appraised value of the mortgaged property and the debt service coverage ratio (the ratio of net operating income to debt service). All commercial and multi-family real estate loans are appraised by outside independent appraisers approved by the board of directors or by internal evaluations, where permitted by regulation. Personal guarantees are generally obtained from the principals of commercial and multi-family real estate loans.

Commercial and multi-family real estate loans entail greater credit risks compared to one- to four-family residential real estate loans because they typically involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. In addition, the payment of loans secured by income-producing properties typically depends on the successful operation of the property, as repayment of the loan generally is dependent, in large part, on sufficient income from the property to cover operating expenses and debt service. Changes in economic conditions that are not in the control of the borrower or lender could affect the value of the collateral for the loan or the future cash flow of the property. Additionally, any decline in real estate values may be more pronounced for commercial and multi-family real estate than residential properties.

Indirect Consumer Lending. As part of our effort to enhance our net interest margin and the interest rate risk sensitivity of our loan portfolio, we originate indirect automobile loans, including on a selective basis, recreational vehicle and boat loans. Indirect consumer loans totaled $79.2 million at December 31, 2016, or 33.7% of our total loan portfolio.

We acquire and underwrite our indirect automobile loans from approximately 40 dealers located primarily in our market area under a tiered-rate structure providing for a dealer reserve premium. The aggregate principal balance of our automobile loan portfolio as of December 31, 2016 was secured primarily by late-model used automobiles. The weighted average current term to maturity of our automobile loan portfolio at December 31, 2016 was 5 years and 8 months.

At December 31, 2016 the average credit score for borrowers of our indirect loans that were originated since May 2008 was 676, and the weighted average rate of these loans was 6.68%. At December 31, 2016, $23.4 million, or 29.5% of our total indirect loan portfolio, consisted of automobile loans where the borrower’s credit score was 660 or less (a possible indication of a less credit-worthy borrower).

Each dealer that originates automobile loans makes representations and warranties with respect to our security interests in the related financed vehicles in a separate dealer agreement with us. These representations and warranties do not relate to the creditworthiness of the borrowers or the collectability of the loan. The dealers are also responsible for ensuring that our security interest in the financed vehicles is perfected.

Each automobile loan requires the borrower to keep the financed vehicle fully insured against loss or damage by fire, theft and collision. The dealer agreements require the dealers to represent that adequate physical damage insurance (collision and comprehensive) was in effect at the time the related loan was originated and financed by us. In addition, we have the right to force place insurance coverage (supplemental insurance taken out by West End Bank, S.B.) in the event the required physical damage insurance on an automobile is not maintained by the borrower. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that each financed vehicle will continue to be covered by physical damage insurance provided by the borrower during the entire term during which the related loan is outstanding. As additional protection, each borrower is required to obtain Vendor Secured Interest (VSI) insurance on each automobile loan.

Each dealer submits credit applications directly to us, and the borrower’s creditworthiness and the age of the automobile are the most important criteria we use in determining whether to purchase an automobile loan from a dealer. Each credit application requires that the borrower provide current information regarding the borrower’s income, employment history, debts, and other factors that bear on creditworthiness. We generally apply uniform underwriting standards when originating the automobile loan although on occasion we will underwrite loans outside of these guidelines. We also obtain a credit report from a major credit reporting agency summarizing the borrower’s credit history and paying habits, including such items as open accounts, delinquent payments, bankruptcies, repossessions, lawsuits and judgments.

The borrower’s credit score and the age of the car are the principal factors used in determining the interest rate and term on the loan. Our underwriting procedures evaluate information relating to the borrower and supplied by the borrower on the credit application combined with information provided by credit reporting agencies and the amount to be financed relative to the value of the related financed vehicle. Additionally, our underwriters may also verify a borrower’s employment income and/or residency or where appropriate, verify a borrower’s payment history directly with the borrower’s creditors. Based on these procedures, a credit decision is considered and approved either automatically or by our personnel at various levels of authority. We generally follow the same underwriting guidelines in originating direct automobile loans.

We generally finance up to the full sales price of the vehicle plus sales tax, dealer preparation fees, license fees and title fees, plus the cost of service and warranty contracts and premiums for physical damage, credit life and disability insurance obtained in connection with the vehicle or the financing (amounts in addition to the sales price are collectively referred to as the “Additional Vehicle Costs”). In addition, we may finance the negative equity related to the vehicle traded in by the borrower in connection with the financing. Accordingly, the amount we finance may exceed, depending on the borrower’s credit score in the case of new vehicles, the dealer’s invoice price of the financed vehicle and the Additional Vehicle Costs, or in the case of a used vehicle, the vehicle’s value and the Additional Vehicle Costs. The maximum amount borrowed generally may not exceed 100% of the Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) of the financed vehicle that is new, or the vehicle’s “retail” value in the case of a used vehicle, including Additional Vehicle Costs. The vehicle’s value is determined by using one of the standard reference sources for dealers of used cars. We regularly review the quality of the loans we purchase from the dealers and periodically conduct quality control audits to ensure compliance with our established policies and procedures. We retain the right to recapture the individual dealer reserve if the loan should default within 120 days.

Generally, automobile loans have greater risk of loss or default than one- to four-family residential real estate loans. We face the risk that any collateral for a defaulted loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance. Thus, the recovery and sale of such property could be insufficient to compensate us for the principal outstanding on these loans. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit our ability to recover on such loans. However, we have attempted to address these inherent risks by lending primarily on late-model used vehicles for which, generally, most of the asset’s rapid depreciation has already occurred. Additionally, we actively monitor delinquencies and losses on our indirect loans to each dealership that originates the loan, and we limit and/or discontinue future loans with dealerships that we deem to contain additional risk to our underwriting.

Direct Consumer Lending. Our direct consumer loans, including unsecured loans, totaled $15.8 million or 6.7% of our total loan portfolio, at December 31, 2016 and consisted principally of loans secured by a wide variety of collateral, including certificates of deposit and marketable securities. Unsecured consumer loans included in the above amount totaled $248,000 or 0.11% of our total loan portfolio. These loans have either a fixed-rate of interest for a maximum term of 60 months, or are revolving lines of credit with an adjustable-rate of interest tied to the prime rate of interest as reported in The Wall Street Journal.

Consumer loans generally have shorter terms to maturity, which reduces our exposure to changes in interest rates. In addition, management believes that offering consumer loan products helps to expand and create stronger ties to our existing customer base by increasing the number of customer relationships and providing cross-marketing opportunities.

Consumer loans generally have greater risk compared to longer-term loans secured by improved, owner-occupied real estate, particularly consumer loans that are secured by rapidly depreciable assets, such as automobiles. In these cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance. As a result, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability and thus are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy.

Second Mortgage Loans and Equity Lines of Credit. We offer second mortgage loans and equity lines of credit secured by a first or second mortgage on residential property. Second mortgage loans and equity lines of credit are made with fixed or adjustable rates, and with combined loan-to-value ratios up to 90% on an owner-occupied principal residence.

Second mortgage loans and equity lines of credit have greater risk than one- to four-family residential real estate loans secured by first mortgages. We face the risk that the collateral will be insufficient to compensate us for loan losses and costs of foreclosure. When customers default on their loans, we attempt to foreclose on the property and resell the property as soon as possible to minimize foreclosure and carrying costs. However, the value of the collateral may not be sufficient to compensate us for the amount of the unpaid loan and we may be unsuccessful in recovering the remaining balance from those customers. Particularly with respect to our second mortgage loans, decreases in real estate values could adversely affect the value of property used as collateral for our loans.

At December 31, 2016, the average loan balance of our outstanding home equity lines of credit was $21,000 and the largest outstanding balance of any such loan was $150,000. This loan was performing in accordance with its repayment terms at December 31, 2016.

We have deemphasized second mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit during the past three years and do not expect to emphasize this type of lending in the current economic environment.

Construction Lending. At December 31, 2016, we had $6.9 million, or 2.9% of our total loan portfolio, in construction loans. We make construction loans to individuals for the construction of their primary residences. These loans generally have maximum terms of 12 months, and upon completion of construction convert to conventional amortizing mortgage loans. Our construction loans have rates and terms comparable to one- to four-family residential real estate loans that we originate. During the construction phase, the borrower generally pays interest only. The maximum loan-to-value ratio of our owner-occupied construction loans is generally 80% of construction costs or completed-appraised-value, whichever is less. Residential construction loans are generally underwritten pursuant to the same guidelines used for originating permanent residential mortgage loans. On occasion, we may consider loans for the construction of commercial properties.

To a lesser extent, we will make loans for the construction of “presold” homes. No more than two such loans may be outstanding to one builder/borrower at any time. These loans generally have initial maximum terms of nine months, although the term may be extended to up to 18 months. The loans generally carry variable rates of interest. The maximum loan-to-value ratio of these construction loans is generally 80% of construction costs or completed-appraised-value, whichever is less.

Construction financing generally involves greater credit risk than long-term financing on improved, owner-occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the value of the property at completion of construction compared to the estimated cost (including interest) of construction and other assumptions. If the estimate of construction cost is inaccurate, we may be required to advance additional funds beyond the amount originally committed in order to protect the value of the property. Moreover, if the estimated value of the completed project is inaccurate, the borrower may hold a property with a value that is insufficient to assure full repayment of the construction loan upon the sale of the property. Construction loans also expose us to the risk that improvements will not be completed on time in accordance with specifications and projected costs. In addition, the ultimate sale or rental of the property may not occur as anticipated.

Commercial Business Lending. At December 31, 2016 commercial business loans represented $12.2 million or 5.2% of our total loan portfolio. Our commercial business loans consist of term loans as well as regular lines of credit and revolving lines of credit to finance short-term working capital needs like accounts receivable and inventory. Our commercial lines of credit are generally priced on an adjustable-rate basis and may be secured or unsecured. We generally obtain personal guarantees with all commercial business loans. Business assets such as accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, furniture and fixtures may be used to secure lines of credit. Our lines of credit typically have a maximum term of 12 months. We also originate commercial term loans to fund long-term borrowing needs such as purchasing equipment, property improvements or other fixed asset needs. We fix the maturity of a term loan to correspond to 80% of the useful life of any equipment purchased or seven years, whichever is less. Term loans can be secured with a variety of collateral, including business assets such as accounts receivable and inventory or long-term assets such as equipment, furniture, fixtures or real estate.

Unlike one- to four-family residential real estate loans, which we generally originate on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from his or her employment and other income, and which are secured by real property whose value tends to be more easily ascertainable, we typically originate commercial business loans on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the borrower’s business or rental income produced by the property. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial business loans may be substantially dependent on the success of the business or rental property itself and the general economic environment. Therefore, commercial business loans that we originate have greater credit risk than one- to four-family residential real estate loans or, generally, consumer loans. In addition, commercial business loans often result in larger outstanding balances to single borrowers, or related groups of borrowers, and also generally require substantially greater evaluation and oversight efforts.

At December 31, 2016, the average loan balance of our outstanding commercial business lines of credit was $128,000, and the largest outstanding balance of such loans was a $2.95 million loan secured by business assets, and is guaranteed by the SBA 7a Program. This loan was performing in accordance with its repayment terms at December 31, 2016.

We believe that commercial business loans will provide growth opportunities for us, and we expect to increase, subject to our conservative underwriting standards and market conditions, this business line in the future. The additional capital we receive in connection with the stock offering will increase our maximum lending limits and will allow us to increase the amounts of our loans to one borrower.

We also offer commercial loans utilizing the Small Business Administration’s 7a Program. The 75% loan guaranty provided under the SBA program reduces our credit risk. In addition, the guaranteed portion of the credit can be sold in the secondary market generating significant fee income opportunities. We face recourse liability on these loans if they do not meet all SBA requirements. We address this risk by utilizing a third-party SBA partner which specializes in underwriting, portfolio composition and servicing of SBA credit facilities. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we originated SBA guaranteed commercial loans of $4.8 million. The guaranteed portion of those loans originated in 2016 was sold for a gain of $597,000.

Originations, Purchases and Sales of Loans

We originate real estate and other loans through marketing efforts, our customer base, walk-in customers and referrals from real estate brokers, builders and attorneys. All loans originated by us are underwritten pursuant to our policies and procedures.

We may sell a certain amount of the loans we originate into the secondary market and in recent years, based upon our interest rate risk analysis, we have sold most of the fixed-rate, one- to four-family residential real estate loans that we originated to Freddie Mac, although we are also approved to sell to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis. On an ongoing basis, we consider our balance sheet as well as market conditions in making decisions as to whether to hold the mortgage loans we originate for investment or to sell such loans to investors, choosing the strategy that is most advantageous to us from a profitability and risk management standpoint. To date, all of our loan sales have been on a servicing-retained basis. At December 31, 2016, we serviced $69.6 million of fixed-rate, one- to four-family residential real estate loans held by other institutions.

From time to time, we purchase loan participations secured by properties within and outside of our primary lending market area in which we are not the lead lender. Historically, the loan participations have been secured by commercial and multi-family real estate. In these circumstances, we follow our customary loan underwriting and approval policies.

The following table sets forth our loan origination, sale and principal repayment activity during the periods indicated. There were no loans purchased during the years presented.

	Years Ended December 31,
	2016			2015
	(In thousands)

Total loans at beginning of period	$	220,317		$	194,258

Loans originated:
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family residential ⁽¹⁾		25,348			24,792
Commercial and multi-family		14,585			13,415
Construction		1,543			2,834
Second mortgages and equity lines of credit		1,853			1,924
Consumer loans:
Indirect		40,994			44,382
Other		9,383			10,183
Commercial business		3,325			5,109
Total loans originated		97,031			102,639

Loans sold:
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family residential		(11,211	)		(16,162	)
Commercial and multi-family		(4,809	)		—
Construction		—			—
Second mortgages and equity lines of credit		—			—
Consumer loans:
Indirect		—			—
Other		—			—
Commercial business		—			—
Total loans sold		(16,020	)		(16,162	)

Other:
Principal repayments		(81,083	)		(75,186	)
Advances on commercial and home equity lines-of-credit loans		19,141			18,195
Other		(4,344	)		(3,427	)

Net loan activity		14,725			26,059
Total loans at end of period	$	235,042		$	220,317

(1)

For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, includes 11,745,000 and $11,649,000 of non-owner-occupied one-to four-family residential loans, respectively.

Delinquencies and Non-Performing Assets

Delinquency Procedures. When a borrower fails to make a required monthly loan payment by the last day of the month, a late notice is generated stating the payment and late charges due. Our policies provide that borrowers are first contacted by phone or mail when they are 16 to 21 days past due to determine the reason for nonpayment and to discuss future payments. Once the loan is considered in default, a certified letter is sent to the borrower explaining that the entire balance of the loan is due and payable. If the borrower does not respond, we will initiate foreclosure proceedings. If the loan is reinstated, foreclosure proceedings will be discontinued and the borrower will be permitted to continue to make payments.

When we acquire real estate as a result of foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure, the real estate is classified as foreclosed real estate held for sale until it is sold. The real estate is recorded at estimated fair value at the date of acquisition less estimated costs to sell, and any write-down resulting from the acquisition is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Estimated fair value is based on a new appraisal which is obtained as soon as practicable, typically after the foreclosure process is completed. Subsequent decreases in the value of the property are charged to operations. After acquisition, all costs incurred in maintaining the property are expensed. Costs relating to the development and improvement of the property, however, are capitalized to the extent of estimated fair value less estimated costs to sell.

Troubled Debt Restructurings. We occasionally modify loans to extend the term or make concessions to help a borrower stay current on his or her loan and to avoid foreclosure/repossession. We generally do not forgive principal or interest on loans. We may modify the terms of loans, to lower interest rates (which may be at below market rates), defer delinquent payments, and/or to provide for longer amortization schedules (up to 40 years on loans secured by real estate), and/or provide for interest-only terms. These modifications are made only when there is a reasonable and attainable workout plan that has been agreed to by the borrower and that is in our best interests.

During the year ending December 31, 2016 there were no loans classified as troubled debt restructuring.

At December 31, 2015, we had one commercial real estate loan totaling $2.2 million classified as a troubled debt restructuring. This loan was restructured in 2013 and was placed in non-accrual status in April of 2015. The loan was transferred to foreclosed real estate held for sale in 2016.

Delinquent Loans. The following table sets forth our loan delinquencies, including non-accrual loans, by type and amount at the dates indicated.

	At December 31,
	2016						2015
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due
	(In thousands)

Real estate loans:
One- to four-family residential
Owner-occupied	$	322	$	93	$	289	$	55	$	43	$	386
Non owner-occupied		––		––		––		––		––		––
Total one- to four-family residential		322		93		289		55		43		386
Commercial and multi-family		––		—		257		––		—		122
Construction		––		—		—		––		—		—
Second mortgages and equity lines of credit		8		10		18		8		7		80
Consumer loans		1,111		396		728		918		219		899
Commercial business		7		—		—		19		14		—
Total	$	1,448	$	499	$	1,292	$	1,000	$	283	$	1,487

	At December 31,
	2014						2013
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due
	(In thousands)

Real estate loans:
One- to four-family residential
Owner-occupied	$	111	$	—	$	835	$	303	$	293	$	1,059
Non owner-occupied		––		236		––		––		47		––
Total one- to four-family residential		111		236		835		303		340		1,059
Commercial and multi-family		––		—		975		––		6		450
Construction		––		—		—		––		—		—
Second mortgages and equity lines of credit		––		—		—		––		14		—
Consumer loans		18		—		21		1,383		314		337
Commercial business		1,014		388		795		16		––		––
Total	$	1,143	$	624	$	2,626	$	1,702	$	674	$	1,846

	At December 31,
	2012
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due


Real estate loans:
One- to four-family residential
Owner-occupied	$	131	$	111	$	1,229
Non owner-occupied		57		––		235
Total one- to four-family residential		188		111		1,464
Commercial and multi-family		––		––		521
Construction		––		—		—
Second mortgages and equity lines of credit		55		29		11
Consumer loans		1,041		416		607
Commercial business		––		––		––
Total	$	1,284	$	556	$	2,603

Classified Assets. Federal regulations provide for the classification of loans and other assets, such as debt and equity securities considered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to be of lesser quality, as “substandard,” “doubtful” or “loss.” An asset is considered “substandard” if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. “Substandard” assets include those characterized by the “distinct possibility” that the insured institution will sustain “some loss” if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as “doubtful” have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified “substandard,” with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make “collection or liquidation in full,” on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, “highly questionable and improbable.” Assets classified as “loss” are those considered “uncollectible” and of such little value that their continuance as assets without the establishment of a specific loss reserve is not warranted. Assets which do not currently expose the insured institution to sufficient risk to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories but possess weaknesses are designated as “special mention” by our management.

When an insured institution classifies problem assets as either substandard or doubtful, it may establish general allowances in an amount deemed prudent by management to cover probable accrued losses. General allowances represent loss allowances which have been established to cover probable accrued losses associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, have not been allocated to particular problem assets. When an insured institution classifies problem assets as “loss,” it is required either to establish a specific allowance for losses equal to 100% of that portion of the asset so classified or to charge-off such amount. An institution’s determination as to the classification of its assets and the amount of its valuation allowances is subject to review by the regulatory authorities, which may require the establishment of additional general or specific loss allowances.

In connection with the filing of our periodic reports and in accordance with our classification of assets policy, we regularly review the problem loans in our portfolio to determine whether any loans require classification in accordance with applicable regulations. Loans are listed on the “watch list” initially because of emerging financial weaknesses even though the loan is currently performing as agreed, or delinquency status, or if the loan possesses weaknesses although currently performing. Management reviews the status of each impaired loan on our watch list on a quarterly basis with the Directors’ Loan Committee and then with the full Board of Directors. If a loan deteriorates in asset quality, the classification is changed to “special mention,” “substandard,” “doubtful” or “loss” depending on the circumstances and the evaluation. Generally, loans 90 days or more past due are placed on nonaccrual status and classified “substandard.”

See Note 3 to our Financial Statements beginning on page F-1 of this annual report for a description by loan category of our classified and special mention assets as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

Non-Performing Assets. We generally cease accruing interest on our loans when contractual payments of principal or interest have become 90 days past due or management has serious doubts about further collectability of principal or interest, even though the loan is currently performing. A loan may remain on accrual status if it is in the process of collection and is either guaranteed or well secured. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid interest credited to income is reversed. Interest received on nonaccrual loans generally is applied against principal. Generally, loans are restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt. Restructured loans are restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with the revised contractual terms for a reasonable period of time (typically six months) and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is reasonably assured.

The following table sets forth information regarding our non-performing assets and troubled debt restructurings at the dates indicated. Troubled debt restructurings include loans for which either a portion of interest or principal has been forgiven, or for loans modified at interest rates materially less than current market rates.

	At December 31,
	2016			2015			2014			2013			2012
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-accrual loans:
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family residential	$	230		$	564		$	762		$	978		$	1,121
Commercial and multi-family ⁽¹⁾		257			2,337			825			2,016			521
Construction		—			—			—			—			—
Second mortgages and equity lines of credit		—			30			––			––			––
Consumer loans		—			—			—			—			—
Commercial business		––			––			––			––			––
Total non-accrual loans		487			2,931			1,587			2,994			1,642

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more:
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family residential		71			149			73			248			343
Commercial and multi-family		—			—			150			—			—
Construction		—			—			—			—			—
Second mortgages and equity lines of credit		18			50			21			—			11
Consumer loans		728			899			795			337			607
Commercial business		––			––			––			––			––
Total accruing loans past due 90 days or more		817			1,098			1,039			585			961
Total of nonaccrual and 90 days or more past due loans		1,304			4,029			2,626			3,579			2,603

Real estate owned:
One- to four-family		103			109			74			89			75
Commercial and multi-family		2,400			699			225			—			—
Commercial		—			—			—			195			270
Other		—			—			—			98			98
Total real estate owned		2,503			808			299			382			443

Other non-performing assets		237			152			140			153			109

Total non-performing assets		4,044			4,989			3,065			4,114			3,155

Troubled debt restructurings (not included above) – commercial and multifamily real estate		—			—			2,275			2,312			1,597

Troubled debt restructurings and total non-performing assets	$	4,044		$	4,988		$	5,340		$	6,426		$	4,752

Total non-performing loans to total loans		0.55	%		1.83	%		1.35	%		2.06	%		1.61	%
Total non-performing assets to total assets		1.41	%		1.84	%		1.18	%		1.62	%		1.28	%
Total non-performing assets and troubled debt restructurings to total assets		1.41	%		1.84	%		2.06	%		2.53	%		1.93	%

(1)

At December 31, 2015, includes $2.2 million of troubled debt restructurings.

Interest income that would have been recorded for the year ended December 31, 2016 had nonaccruing loans been current according to their original terms amounted to $101,000. No interest was recognized on these loans nor included in net income for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Non-performing one- to four-family residential real estate loans totaled $301,000 at December 31, 2016 and consisted of four loans of which the largest totaled $111,000.

We had two non-performing commercial and multi-family real estate loans at December 31, 2016 with a total balance of $257,000, the largest of which was for $140,000 and was secured by owner occupied real estate.

Other non-performing loans totaled $746,000 at December 31, 2016, which included consumer loans of $728,000 and second mortgages of $18,000.

Other real estate owned totaled $2.5 million at December 31, 2016, which is comprised of a single commercial credit for a hotel, property valued at $1.8 million which includes multiple acres of land intended for commercial use, and three one- to four- family residential properties.

There were no other loans at December 31, 2016 that are not already disclosed where there is information about possible credit problems of borrowers that caused us serious doubts about the ability of the borrowers to comply with present loan repayment terms and that may result in disclosure of such loans in the future.

Allowance for Loan Losses

Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Loan Losses. Our allowance for loan losses is the amount considered necessary to reflect probable incurred losses in our loan portfolio. We evaluate the need to establish allowances against losses on loans on a quarterly basis. When additional allowances are necessary, a provision for loan losses is charged to earnings.

Our methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses consists of two key elements: (1) specific allowances for identified impaired loans; and (2) a general valuation allowance on the remainder of the loan portfolio. Although we determine the amount of each element of the allowance separately, the entire allowance for loan losses is available for the entire portfolio.

We identify loans that may need to be charged off as a loss by reviewing all delinquent loans, classified loans, and other loans about which management may have concerns about collectability. For individually reviewed loans, the borrower’s inability to make payments under the terms of the loan as well as the shortfall in collateral value would result in our charging off the loan or the portion of the loan that was impaired.

Among other factors, we consider current general economic conditions, including current housing price depreciation, in determining the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses for our residential real estate portfolio. We use evidence obtained from our own loan portfolio as well as published housing data on our local markets from third party sources we believe to be reliable as a basis for assumptions about the impact of housing depreciation. We have increased general and specific allowances for our residential real estate loans over the past several quarters, in part, because the values of residential real estate in our local markets securing our portfolio have declined significantly and may continue to decline.

Substantially all of our loans are secured by collateral. Loans 90 days past due and other classified loans are evaluated for impairment and general or specific allowances are established. Typically for a nonperforming real estate loan in the process of collection, the value of the underlying collateral is estimated using the original independent appraisal, adjusted for current economic conditions and other factors, and related general or specific reserves are adjusted on a quarterly basis. If a nonperforming real estate loan is in the process of foreclosure and/or there are serious doubts about further collectability of principal or interest, and there is uncertainty about the value of the underlying collateral, we will order a new independent appraisal. Any shortfall would result in immediately charging off the portion of the loan that was impaired.

Specific Allowances for Identified Problem Loans. We establish a specific allowance when loans are determined to be impaired. Loss is measured by determining the present value of expected future cash flows or, for collateral-dependent loans, the fair value of the collateral adjusted for market conditions and selling expenses. Factors in identifying a specific problem loan include: (1) the strength of the customer’s personal or business cash flows; (2) the availability of other sources of repayment; (3) the amount due or past due; (4) the type and value of collateral; (5) the strength of our collateral position; (6) the estimated cost to sell the collateral; and (7) the borrower’s effort to cure the delinquency. In addition, for loans secured by real estate, we consider the extent of any past due and unpaid property taxes applicable to the property serving as collateral on the mortgage.

General Valuation Allowance on the Remainder of the Loan Portfolio. We establish a general allowance for loans that are not classified as impaired to recognize the inherent losses associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, has not been allocated to particular problem assets. This general valuation allowance is determined by segregating the loans by loan category and assigning allowance percentages based on our historical loss experience, delinquency trends and management’s evaluation of the collectability of the loan portfolio. The allowance may be adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s judgment, affect the collectability of the portfolio as of the evaluation date. These significant factors may include changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our primary market area, credit quality trends, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan portfolio, recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, duration of the current business cycle and bank regulatory examination results. The applied loss factors are re-evaluated quarterly to ensure their relevance in the current real estate environment.

As an integral part of their examination process, the FDIC and the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions will periodically review our allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require that we recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments of information available to them at the time of their examination.

Allowance for Loan Losses. The following table sets forth activity in our allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014			2013			2012

Allowance at beginning of period	$	2,193		$	1,944		$	2,398		$	2,013		$	1,904
Provision for loan losses		1,861			1,507			1,699			1,447			1,235
Charge offs:
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family residential		(159	)		(220	)		(653	)		(227	)		(379	)
Commercial and multi-family		(353	)		(211	)		(947	)		(68	)		(144	)
Construction		—			—			—			—			—
Second mortgages and equity lines of credit		—			—			—			(18	)		(22	)
Consumer loans		(1,333	)		(901	)		(646	)		(805	)		(592	)
Commercial business		(54	)		(75	)		––			––			(52	)
Total charge-offs		(1,899	)		(1,407	)		(2,246	)		(1,118	)		(1,189	)

Recoveries:
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family residential		8			56			32			4			3
Commercial and multi-family		—			4			—			—			—
Construction		—			—			—			—			—
Second mortgages and equity lines of credit		—			—			—			—			7
Consumer loans		114			89			61			52			53
Commercial business		—			—			—			—			—
Total recoveries		122			149			93			56			63

Net (charge-offs) recoveries		(1,777	)		(1,258	)		(2,153	)		(1,062	)		(1,126	)

Allowance at end of period	$	2,277		$	2,193		$	1,944		$	2,398		$	2,013

Allowance to non-performing loans		174.62	%		54.44	%		74.03	%		67.00	%		77.36	%
Allowance to total loans outstanding at the end of the period		0.97	%		1.00	%		1.00	%		1.38	%		1.25	%
Net (charge-offs) recoveries to average loans outstanding during the period		(0.77	)%		(0.60	)%		(1.17	)%		(0.64	)%		(0.71	)%

Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses. The following tables set forth the allowance for loan losses allocated by loan category, the percent of allowance in each loan category to the total allowance, and the percent of loans in each category to total loans at the dates indicated. The allowance for loan losses allocated to each category is not necessarily indicative of future losses in any particular category and does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in other categories.

	At December 31, 2016								At December 31, 2015
	Amount		% of Allowance to Total Allowance			% of Loans in Category to Total Loans			Amount		% of Allowance to Total Allowance			% of Loans in Category to Total Loans
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family residential	$	329		14.45	%		27.72	%	$	390		17.78	%		27.67	%
Commercial and multi-family		670		29.42			21.30			749		34.15			21.66
Construction		-		-			2.94			3		0.14			1.58
Second mortgages and equity lines of credit		-		-			2.44			11		0.50			2.51
Consumer loans		1,031		45.28			40.43			996		45.42			40.19
Commercial business		247		10.85			5.17			44		2.01			6.39
Total allowance for loan losses	$	2,277		100.00	%		100.00	%	$	2,193		100.00	%		100.00	%

	At December 31, 2014								At December 31, 2013
	Amount		% of Allowance to Total Allowance			% of Loans in Category to Total Loans			Amount		% of Allowance to Total Allowance			% of Loans in Category to Total Loans
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family residential	$	447		23.00	%		31.86	%	$	433		18.06	%		35.06	%
Commercial and multi-family		694		35.70			20.33			1,238		51.63			20.66
Construction		2		0.10			2.25			-		0.00			0.85
Second mortgages and equity lines of credit		14		0.72			2.38			35		1.46			2.51
Consumer loans		758		38.99			37.89			656		27.35			35.68
Commercial business		29		1.49			5.29			36		1.50			5.24
Total allowance for loan losses	$	1,944		100.00	%		100.00	%	$	2,398		100.00	%		100.00	%

	At December 31, 2012
	Amount		% of Allowance to Total Allowance			% of Loans in Category to Total Loans

Real estate loans:
One- to four-family residential	$	542		26.92	%		34.72	%
Commercial and multi-family		829		41.18			21.06
Construction		4		0.20			1.54
Second mortgages and equity lines of credit		32		1.59			2.54
Consumer loans		552		27.42			34.88
Commercial business		54		2.68			5.26
Total allowance for loan losses	$	2,013		100.00	%		100.00	%

At December 31, 2016, our allowance for loan losses represented 0.97% of total loans and 174.62% of nonperforming loans, and at December 31, 2015, our allowance for loan losses represented 1.00% of total loans and 54.44% of nonperforming loans. Nonperforming loans decreased primarily due to a $2.2 million commercial property that was transferred to foreclosed real estate held for sale during 2016. The allowance for loan losses was $2.3 million at December 31, 2016 and was $2.2 million at December 31, 2015, due to a provision for loan losses of $1.9 million, offset by net charge-offs of $1.8 million during 2016. Net charge-offs for 2016 included $54,000 in commercial credits, $1.2 million in auto loans, $151,000 in secured residential real estate, and $353,000 in commercial and multifamily real estate loans.

Although we believe that we use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary and results of operations could be adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the determinations. Furthermore, while we believe we have established our allowance for loan losses in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, regulators, in reviewing our loan portfolio, may request us to increase our allowance for loan losses. In addition, because future events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, the existing allowance for loan losses may not be adequate and increases may be necessary should the quality of any loan deteriorate as a result of the factors discussed above. Any material increase in the allowance for loan losses may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Investment Activities

General. The goals of our investment policy are to provide and maintain liquidity to meet deposit withdrawal and loan funding needs, to help mitigate our interest rate risk, and to generate a favorable return on idle funds within the context of our interest rate and credit risk objectives. In recent years beginning with the recession which began in 2008 and the subsequent challenging economic environment, our strategy has been to reduce the maturities of our investment securities portfolio. Subject to loan demand and our interest rate risk analysis, we may increase the balance of our investment securities portfolio when we have excess liquidity.

Our board of directors is responsible for adopting our investment policy. The investment policy is reviewed annually by management and any changes to the policy are recommended to and subject to the approval of the board of directors. Authority to make investments under the approved investment policy guidelines is delegated to our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. All investment transactions are reviewed quarterly by the board of directors.

Our current investment policy permits, with certain limitations, investments in securities issued by the United States Government and its agencies or government sponsored enterprises, mortgage-backed securities and, to a lesser extent, corporate debt securities, commercial paper, certificates of deposits in other financial institutions, investments in bank-owned life insurance, collateralized mortgage obligations, asset-backed securities, real estate mortgage investment conduits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and debt securities of state and political subdivisions.

At December 31, 2016, we did not have an investment in the securities of any single non-government issuer that exceeded 10% of our equity at that date.

Our current investment policy does not permit investment in stripped mortgage-backed securities, complex securities and derivatives as defined in federal banking regulations and other high-risk securities. Our current policy does not permit hedging activities, such as engaging in futures, options or swap transactions, or investing in high-risk mortgage derivatives, such as collateralized mortgage obligation residual interests, real estate mortgage investment conduit residual interests or stripped mortgage backed securities.

At December 31, 2016, none of the collateral underlying our securities portfolio was considered subprime or Alt-A, and we did not hold any common or preferred stock issued by Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae as of that date.

Municipal Bonds. At December 31, 2016, the carrying value of municipal bonds in our portfolio totaled $1.9 million. These securities generally provide similar or higher yields than other investments in our securities investment portfolio. While they do not provide the liquidity of other securities, we maintain these investments, to the extent appropriate, for tax planning, as collateral for borrowings and for prepayment protection.

Mortgage-Backed Securities. At December 31, 2016, the carrying value of our mortgage-backed securities portfolio totaled $21.9 million. Mortgage-backed securities are securities issued in the secondary market that are collateralized by pools of mortgages. Certain types of mortgage-backed securities are commonly referred to as “pass-through” certificates because the principal and interest of the underlying loans is “passed through” to investors, net of certain costs, including servicing and guarantee fees. Mortgage-backed securities typically are collateralized by pools of one- to four-family or multifamily mortgages, although we invest primarily in mortgage-backed securities backed by one- to four-family mortgages. The issuers of such securities pool and resell the participation interests in the form of securities to investors such as West End Bank, S.B. The interest rate of the security is lower than the interest rates of the underlying loans to allow for payment of servicing and guaranty fees. Most of our mortgage-backed securities are either backed by Ginnie Mae, a United States Government agency, or government-sponsored entities, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by United States Government agencies and government-sponsored entities are more liquid than individual mortgage loans because there is an active trading market for such securities. In addition, residential mortgage-backed securities may be used to collateralize our borrowings. Investments in residential mortgage-backed securities involve a risk that actual payments will be greater or less than the prepayment rate estimated at the time of purchase, which may require adjustments to the amortization of any premium or accretion of any discount relating to such interests, thereby affecting the net yield on our securities. Current prepayment speeds determine whether prepayment estimates require modification that could cause amortization or accretion adjustments.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock. We hold common stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis in connection with our borrowing activities totaling $1.3 million at December 31, 2016. The common stock of such entity is carried at cost and classified as restricted equity securities.

Bank-Owned Life Insurance. We invest in bank-owned life insurance to provide us with a funding source for our benefit plan obligations. Bank-owned life insurance also generally provides us non-interest income that is non-taxable. At December 31, 2016, our investment in bank-owned life insurance totaled $6.8 million and was issued by four insurance companies.

Securities Portfolio Composition. The following table sets forth the amortized cost and fair value of our securities portfolio, all of which were available for sale, at the dates indicated. Securities available for sale are carried at fair value.

	At December 31,
	2016				2015				2014
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Securities available for sale:
Municipal bonds	$	2,021	$	1,854	$	9,168	$	9,171	$	13,053	$	13,047
Mortgage-backed securities – GSE residential		22,278		21,874		19,194		18,930		29,658		29,492
Total available for sale	$	24,299	$	23,728	$	28,362	$	28,101	$	42,711	$	42,539

Securities Portfolio Maturities and Yields. The following table sets forth the stated maturities and weighted average yields of our securities at December 31, 2016. Securities available for sale are carried at fair value. Municipal bond yields have not been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis. Mortgage-backed securities, including collateralized mortgage obligations, are anticipated to be repaid in advance of their contractual maturities as a result of projected mortgage loan repayments. Certain securities have interest rates that are adjustable and will reprice annually within the various maturity ranges. These repricing schedules have not been reflected in the table below.

	One Year or Less				More than One Year to Five Years				More than Five Years to Ten Years					More than Ten Years					Total
December 31, 2016	Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield		Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield		Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield			Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield			Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield
	(Dollars in thousands)

Securities available for sale:
Municipal bonds	$	-		-	$	-		-	$	-		-		$	2,021		3.81	%	$	2,021		3.81	%
Mortgage-backed securities – GSE residential		-		-		-		-		5,822		1.91	%		16,456		1.57	%		22,278		1.66	%
Total available for sale	$	-		-	$	-		-	$	5,822		1.91	%	$	18,477		1.80	%	$	24,299		1.83	%

Sources of Funds

General. Deposits have traditionally been our primary source of funds for use in lending and investment activities. We also use borrowings, primarily Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis advances, to supplement cash flow needs, lengthen the maturities of liabilities for interest rate risk purposes and to manage the cost of funds. In addition, we receive funds from scheduled loan payments, investment maturities, loan prepayments, retained earnings and income on earning assets. While scheduled loan payments and income on earning assets are relatively stable sources of funds, deposit inflows and outflows can vary widely and are influenced by prevailing interest rates, market conditions and levels of competition. To a lesser extent, we may utilize repurchase agreements or Federal Fund Sold as funding sources

Deposits. Our deposits are generated primarily from residents within our primary market area. We offer a selection of deposit accounts, including non-interest-bearing and interest-bearing checking accounts, NOW accounts, money market accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit. Deposit account terms vary, with the principal differences being the minimum balance required, the amount of time the funds must remain on deposit and the interest rate. We have not in the past nor presently have any brokered deposits. However, dependent on our future needs for, we could utilize this avenue for liquidity purposes.

In recent years, we have focused on deposit generation from small- and mid-sized businesses and professionals in our market area through aggressive marketing campaigns, including our Business Links program, a selection of commercial deposit services, including deposit pick-up services and, as requested, remote capture. Additionally, we offer non-conforming loan products on one- to four-family residential real estate loans in connection with which the borrower is required to open a money market deposit account with us.

Interest rates paid, maturity terms, service fees and withdrawal penalties are established on a periodic basis. Deposit rates and terms are based primarily on current operating strategies and market rates, liquidity requirements, rates paid by competitors and growth goals. Personalized customer service, long-standing relationships with customers, and the favorable image of West End Bank, S.B. in the community are relied upon to attract and retain deposits.

The flow of deposits is influenced significantly by general economic conditions, changes in interest rates and competition. Our ability to gather deposits is impacted by the competitive market in which we operate which includes numerous financial institutions of varying sizes offering a wide range of products. We often use promotional rates to meet asset/liability and market segment goals.

The variety of deposit accounts offered allows us to be competitive in obtaining funds and responding to changes in consumer demand. Based on our experience, we believe that non-interest-bearing and interest-bearing checking, money market and savings accounts may be somewhat more stable sources of deposits than certificates of deposits. Also, we believe that our deposits allow us a greater opportunity to connect with our customers and offer them other financial services and products. As a result, we have used marketing and other initiatives to increase such accounts. However, it can be difficult to attract and maintain such deposits at favorable interest rates under current market conditions.

The following table sets forth the distribution of total deposits by account type, for the periods indicated.

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2016								2015								2014
	Amount		Percent			Weighted Average Rate			Amount		Percent			Weighted Average Rate			Amount		Percent			Weighted Average Rate

Non-interest bearing	$	22,154		9.85	%		0.00	%	$	19,358		8.99	%		0.00	%	$	17,899		8.78	%		0.00	%
Checking		33,921		15.08			0.13			30,554		14.19			0.13			29,654		14.59			0.13
Money market		38,695		17.21			0.38			38,533		17.90			0.39			42,111		20.66			0.39
Savings		21,649		9.63			0.10			18,271		8.49			0.10			16,108		7.90			0.10
Certificates and other time deposits of $100,000 or more		66,826		29.71			1.33			67,452		31.33			1.21			53,187		26.10			1.03
Other certificates and time deposits		41,653		18.52			1.01			41,110		19.10			0.98			44,771		21.97			0.96
Total	$	224,898		100.00	%				$	215,278		100.00	%				$	203,730		100.00	%

As of December 31, 2016, the aggregate amount of all our certificates of deposit in amounts greater than or equal to $100,000 was approximately $66.8 million. The following table sets forth the maturity of these certificates as of December 31, 2016.

	At December 31, 2016
	(In thousands)
Maturity Period:
Three months or less	$	4,236
Over three through six months		11,007
Over six through twelve months		18,958
Over twelve months		32,625
Total	$	66,826

The following table sets forth all our certificates of deposit classified by interest rate as of the dates indicated.

	At December 31,
	2016		2015
	(In thousands)

INTEREST RATE:
Less than 1%	$	14,499	$	31,624
1.00% - 1.99%		89,897		71,704
2.00% - 2.99%		4,035		5,186
3.00% - 3.99%		-		-
4.00% - 4.99%		48		48
Total	$	108,479	$	108,562

Borrowings. At December 31, 2016 our borrowings consisted of $32.0 million in advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis. We may obtain advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis upon the security of our capital stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis and certain of our mortgage loans. Such advances may be made pursuant to several different credit programs, each of which has its own interest rate and range of maturities. To the extent such borrowings have different terms to repricing than our deposits, they can change our interest rate risk profile.

From time to time during recent years, we have utilized short-term borrowings to fund loan demand. To a limited extent, we have also used borrowings where market conditions permit to purchase securities of a similar duration in order to increase our net interest income by the amount of the spread between the asset yield and the borrowing cost. From time to time, we have obtained advances with terms of more than one year to extend the term of our liabilities.

At December 31, 2016, based on available collateral and our ownership of FHLB stock, and based upon our internal policy, we had access to additional Federal Home Loan Bank advances of up to $30.6 million.

The following table sets forth information concerning balances and interest rates on our Federal Home Loan Bank advances at the date and for the periods indicated.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015

Average amount outstanding during the period:
FHLB advances	$	30,418		$	29,340
Weighted average interest rate during the period:
FHLB advances		1.40	%		1.57	%
Balance outstanding at end of period:
FHLB advances		32,000			27,000
Weighted average interest rate at end of period:
FHLB advances		1.35	%		1.69	%

Expense and Tax Allocation

West End Bank, S.B. has entered into an agreement with West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. to provide it with certain administrative support services for compensation not less than the fair market value of the services provided. In addition, West End Bank, S.B. and West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. have entered into an agreement to establish a method for allocating and for reimbursing the payment of their consolidated tax liability.

Personnel

As of December 31, 2016, we had 75 full-time equivalent employees. Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining group. Management believes that we have a good working relationship with our employees.

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

General

West End Bank, S.B. is examined and supervised by the Division of Banking of the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. This regulation and supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which an institution may engage and is intended primarily for the protection of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s deposit insurance fund and depositors. These regulators are not, however, generally charged with protecting the interests of stockholders of West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. Under this system of state and federal regulation, financial institutions are periodically examined to ensure that they satisfy applicable standards with respect to their capital adequacy, assets, management, earnings, liquidity and sensitivity to market interest rates. West End Bank, S.B. also is a member of and owns stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis, which is one of the twelve regional banks in the Federal Home Loan Bank System. West End Bank, S.B.’s relationship with its depositors and borrowers also is regulated to a great extent by both federal and state laws, especially in matters concerning the ownership of deposit accounts and the form and content of West End Bank, S.B.’s mortgage documents.

The Indiana Department of Financial Institutions and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation have extensive enforcement authority over Indiana-chartered savings banks, such as West End Bank, S.B. This enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to issue cease-and-desist or removal orders, to assess civil money penalties and to initiate injunctive actions. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe and unsound banking practices.

The Indiana Department of Financial Institutions has established a schedule for the assessment of “supervisory fees” for all Indiana savings banks to fund the operations of the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions. These supervisory fees are computed on the basis of each savings bank’s total assets (including consolidated subsidiaries) and are payable at the end of each calendar quarter. A schedule of fees has also been established for certain filings made by Indiana savings banks with the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions. The Indiana Department of Financial Institutions also assesses fees for examinations conducted by the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions’ staff, based upon the number of hours spent by the staff performing the examination. During the year ended December 31, 2016, West End Bank, S.B. paid approximately $27,700 in supervisory fees and no examination fees. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation does not assess fees for its examination and supervisory activities.

The material regulatory requirements that are applicable to West End Bank, S.B. and West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. are described below. This description of statutes and regulations is not intended to be a complete description of such statutes and regulations and their effects on West End Bank, S.B. and West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. Any change in these laws or regulations, whether by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions, the Federal Reserve Board, or Congress, could have a material adverse impact on West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. and West End Bank, S.B., and their operations.

As a savings and loan holding company, West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. is required to file certain reports with, and is subject to inspection and supervision by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, and otherwise must comply with the rules and regulations of the Federal Reserve Board. West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. is also subject to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission under the federal securities laws.

The Dodd-Frank Act

The Dodd-Frank Act has significantly changed the bank regulatory structure and has affected the lending, investment, trading and operating activities of financial institutions and their holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act eliminated the Office of Thrift Supervision on July 21, 2011. The Dodd-Frank Act also authorizes the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to supervise and regulate all savings and loan holding companies like West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc., in addition to bank holding companies which it regulates. As a result, the Federal Reserve Board’s regulations applicable to bank holding companies, including holding company capital requirements, apply to savings and loan holding companies like West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc., unless an exemption exists. These capital requirements are substantially similar to the capital requirements currently applicable to West End Bank, S.B. as described in “–Federal Banking Regulation–Capital Requirements.” The Dodd-Frank Act also requires the Federal Reserve Board to set minimum capital levels for bank holding companies that are as stringent as those required for the insured depository subsidiaries, and the components of Tier 1 capital are restricted to capital instruments that are currently considered to be Tier 1 capital for insured depository institutions. Bank holding companies with assets of less than $500 million are exempt from these capital requirements. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the proceeds of trust preferred securities are excluded from Tier 1 capital unless such securities were issued prior to May 19, 2010 by bank or savings and loan holding companies with less than $15 billion of assets. The legislation also establishes a floor for capital of insured depository institutions that cannot be lower than the standards in effect today, and directs the federal banking regulators to implement new leverage and capital requirements within 18 months that take into account off-balance sheet activities and other risks, including risks relating to securitized products and derivatives.

The Dodd-Frank Act also created a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and savings institutions such as West End Bank, S.B., including the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has examination and enforcement authority over all banks and savings institutions with more than $10 billion in assets. Banks and savings institutions with $10 billion or less in assets will be examined by their applicable bank regulators. The new legislation also weakens the federal preemption available for national banks and federal savings associations, and gives state attorneys general the ability to enforce applicable federal consumer protection laws.

The legislation also broadens the base for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance assessments. Assessments will now be based on the average consolidated total assets less tangible equity capital of a financial institution. The Dodd-Frank Act also permanently increased the maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per depositor. Lastly, the Dodd-Frank Act increases stockholder influence over boards of directors by requiring companies to give stockholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and so-called “golden parachute” payments. The legislation also directs the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid to bank holding company executives, regardless of whether the company is publicly traded or not.

Savings Bank Regulation

As an Indiana savings bank, West End Bank, S.B. is subject to federal regulation and supervision by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and to state regulation and supervision by the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions. West End Bank, S.B.’s deposit accounts are insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund, which is administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. West End Bank, S.B. is not a member of the Federal Reserve System.

Both federal and Indiana law extensively regulate various aspects of the banking business such as reserve requirements, truth-in-lending and truth-in-savings disclosures, equal credit opportunity, fair credit reporting, trading in securities and other aspects of banking operations. Current federal law also requires savings banks, among other things, to make deposited funds available within specified time periods.

Under Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation regulations, an insured state chartered bank, such as West End Bank, S.B., is prohibited from engaging as principal in activities that are not permitted for national banks, unless: (i) the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation determines that the activity would pose no significant risk to the appropriate deposit insurance fund and (ii) the bank is, and continues to be, in compliance with all applicable capital standards.

Branching and Interstate Banking. The establishment of branches by West End Bank, S.B. is subject to approval of the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and geographic limits established by state laws. The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (the “Riegle-Neal Act”) facilitates the interstate expansion and consolidation of banking organizations by permitting, among other things, (i) bank holding companies that are adequately capitalized and managed to acquire banks located in states outside their home state regardless of whether such acquisitions are authorized under the law of the host state, (ii) the interstate merger of banks, subject to the right of individual states to “opt out” of this authority, and (iii) banks to establish new branches on an interstate basis provided that such action is specifically authorized by the law of the host state.

Qualified Thrift Lender Test. In order for West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. to be regulated as a savings and loan holding company by the Federal Reserve Board (rather than as a bank holding company by the Federal Reserve Board), West End Bank, S.B. must satisfy the “qualified thrift lender” or “QTL,” test. Under the QTL test, West End Bank, S.B. must maintain at least 65% of its “portfolio assets” in “qualified thrift investments” (primarily residential mortgages and related investments, including mortgage-backed securities) in at least nine months of the most recent 12-month period. “Portfolio assets” generally means total assets of a savings bank, less the sum of specified liquid assets up to 20% of total assets, goodwill and other intangible assets, and the value of property used in the conduct of the savings bank’s business.

West End Bank, S.B. also may satisfy the QTL test by qualifying as a “domestic building and loan association” as defined in the Internal Revenue Code.

At December 31, 2016, West End Bank, S.B. maintained 89% of its portfolio assets in qualified thrift investments and has met the qualified thrift lender test in each of the last 12 months.

Transactions with Related Parties. A savings bank’s authority to engage in transactions with its affiliates is limited by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation W promulgated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. An affiliate is generally a company that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with an insured depository institution such as West End Bank, S.B. West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. is an affiliate of West End Bank, S.B. In general, transactions between an insured depository institution and its affiliates are subject to certain quantitative and collateral requirements. In addition, applicable regulations prohibit a savings bank from lending to any of its affiliates that are engaged in activities that are not permissible for bank holding companies and from purchasing the securities of any affiliate, other than a subsidiary. Finally, transactions with affiliates must be consistent with safe and sound banking practices, not involve low-quality assets and be on terms that are as favorable to the institution as comparable transactions with non-affiliates. Applicable regulators require savings banks to maintain detailed records of all transactions with affiliates.

West End Bank, S.B.’s authority to extend credit to its directors, executive officers and 10% or greater stockholders, as well as to entities controlled by such persons, is governed by the requirements of Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O promulgated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Among other things, these provisions require that extensions of credit to insiders:

(i)

be made on terms that are substantially the same as, and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than, those prevailing for comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons and that do not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features, and

(ii)

not exceed certain limitations on the amount of credit extended to such persons, individually and in the aggregate, which limits are based, in part, on the amount of West End Bank, S.B.’s capital.

In addition, extensions of credit in excess of certain limits must be approved in advance by West End Bank, S.B.’s Board of Directors.

Capital Requirements. Under Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation regulations, state-chartered banks, such as West End Bank, S.B., are required to maintain a minimum leverage capital requirement consisting of a ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets of 3% if the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation determines that the institution is not anticipating or experiencing significant growth and has well-diversified risk, including no undue interest rate risk exposure, excellent asset quality, high liquidity, good earnings, and in general, a strong banking organization, rated composite 1 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System (the CAMELS rating system) established by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council. For all but the most highly rated institutions meeting the conditions set forth above, the minimum leverage capital ratio is 4%. Tier 1 capital is the sum of common stockholders’ equity, noncumulative perpetual preferred stock (including any related surplus) and minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries, minus all intangible assets (other than certain mortgage servicing assets, purchased credit card relationships, credit-enhancing interest-only strips and certain deferred tax assets), identified losses, investments in certain financial subsidiaries and non-financial equity investments.

In addition to the leverage capital ratio (the ratio of Tier I capital to total assets), state chartered banks must maintain a minimum ratio of qualifying total capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8%, of which at least half must be Tier 1 capital. Qualifying total capital consists of Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 capital (also referred to as supplementary capital) items. Tier 2 capital items include allowances for loan losses in an amount of up to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets, cumulative preferred stock and preferred stock with a maturity of over 20 years, certain other capital instruments and up to 45% of pre-tax net unrealized holding gains on equity securities. The includable amount of Tier 2 capital cannot exceed the institution’s Tier 1 capital. Qualifying total capital is further reduced by the amount of the bank’s investments in banking and finance subsidiaries that are not consolidated for regulatory capital purposes, reciprocal cross-holdings of capital securities issued by other banks, most intangible assets and certain other deductions. Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation risk-weighted system, all of a bank’s balance sheet assets and the credit equivalent amounts of certain off-balance sheet items are assigned to one of four broad risk-weight categories from 0% to 100%, based on the risks inherent in the type of assets or item. The aggregate dollar amount of each category is multiplied by the risk weight assigned to that category. The sum of these weighted values equals the bank’s risk-weighted assets.

In July 2013, the FDIC and the other federal bank regulatory agencies issued a final rule that revised their leverage and risk-based capital requirements and the method for calculating risk-weighted assets to make them consistent with agreements that were reached by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The final rule applies to all depository institutions, top-tier bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $500 million or more and top-tier savings and loan holding companies. Among other things, the rule establishes a new common equity Tier 1 minimum capital requirement (4.5% of risk-weighted assets), increases the minimum Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets requirement (from 4% to 6% of risk-weighted assets) and assigns a higher risk weight (150%) to exposures that are more than 90 days past due or are on nonaccrual status and to certain commercial real estate facilities that finance the acquisition, development or construction of real property. The final rule also requires unrealized gains and losses on certain “available-for-sale” securities holdings to be included for purposes of calculating regulatory capital requirements unless a one-time opt-in or opt-out is exercised. The rule limits a banking organization’s capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments if the banking organization does not hold a “capital conservation buffer” consisting of 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets in addition to the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements. The final rule becomes effective for West End Bank on January 1, 2015. The capital conservation buffer requirement will be phased in beginning January 1, 2016 and ending January 1, 2019, when the full capital conservation buffer requirement will be effective.

Dividend Limitations. The primary source of West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.’s cash flow, including cash flow to pay dividends on West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.’s common stock, is the payment of dividends to West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. by West End Bank, S.B. Under Indiana law, West End Bank, S.B. may pay dividends of so much of its undivided profits (generally, earnings less losses, bad debts, taxes and other operating expenses) as is considered expedient by West End Bank, S.B.’s board. However, West End Bank, S.B. must obtain the approval of the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions for the payment of a dividend if the total of all dividends declared by West End Bank, S.B. during the current year, including the proposed dividend, would exceed the sum of retained net income for the year to date plus its retained net income for the previous two years. For this purpose, “retained net income” means net income as calculated for call report purposes, less all dividends declared for the applicable period. Also, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has the supervisory authority to prohibit West End Bank, S.B. from paying dividends if, in its opinion, the payment of dividends would constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice in light of the financial condition of West End Bank, S.B. In addition, since West End Bank, S.B. is a subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company, West End Bank, S.B. must file a notice with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago at least 30 days before the board of directors of West End Bank, S.B. declares a dividend or approves a capital distribution.

Insurance of Deposit Accounts. The deposit accounts of the Bank are insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund (the “DIF”) of the FDIC up to $250,000 per depositor for each ownership category. The FDIC assesses premiums on the Bank based on a risk-based assessment system and the amount of deposits held by the institution.

Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that an institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC. The Bank does not believe that it is taking or is subject to any action, condition or violation that could lead to termination of its deposit insurance.

The Dodd-Frank Act increased the minimum target ratio for the DIF from 1.15% of estimated insured deposits to 1.35% of estimated insured deposits. The FDIC must seek to achieve the 1.35% ratio by September 30, 2020. Insured institutions with assets of $10 billion or more are supposed to fund the increase. The Dodd-Frank Act eliminated the 1.5% maximum fund ratio, instead leaving it to the discretion of the FDIC, and the FDIC has exercised that discretion by establishing a long-term fund ratio of 2%.

All FDIC-insured institutions are required to pay a pro rata portion of the interest due on obligations issued by the Financing Corporation (“FICO”) for anticipated payments, issuance costs and custodial fees on bonds issued by the FICO in the 1980s to recapitalize the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation. The bonds issued by the FICO are due to mature in 2017 through 2019. For the quarter ended December 31, 2016, the annualized FICO assessment was equal to 0.56 cents for each $100 in domestic deposits maintained at an institution.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Bank expensed $188,000 related to the FICO bonds and deposit insurance assessments.

Federal Home Loan Bank System. West End Bank, S.B. is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System, which consists of 12 regional Federal Home Loan Banks. The Federal Home Loan Bank System provides a central credit facility primarily for member institutions as well as other entities involved in home mortgage lending. As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis, West End Bank, S.B. is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank. As of December 31, 2016, West End Bank, S.B. was in compliance with this requirement.

Community Reinvestment Act. Under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), West End Bank, S.B. has a continuing and affirmative obligation consistent with its safe and sound operation to help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community, consistent with the CRA. The CRA requires the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in connection with its examination of West End Bank, S.B., to assess its record of meeting the credit needs of its community and to take that record into account in its evaluation of certain applications by West End Bank, S.B. For example, the regulations specify that a bank’s CRA performance will be considered in its expansion (e.g., branching) proposals and may be the basis for approving, denying or conditioning the approval of an application. As of the date of its most recent regulatory examination, West End Bank, S.B. was rated “satisfactory” with respect to its CRA compliance.

Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act requires, among other things, that federal bank regulatory authorities take “prompt corrective action” with respect to institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. For these purposes, the statute establishes five capital tiers: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation may order savings banks which have insufficient capital to take corrective actions. For example, a savings bank which is categorized as “undercapitalized” would be subject to growth limitations and would be required to submit a capital restoration plan, and a holding company that controls such a savings bank would be required to guarantee that the savings bank complies with the restoration plan. A “significantly undercapitalized” savings bank would be subject to additional restrictions. Savings banks deemed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to be “critically undercapitalized” would be subject to the appointment of a receiver or conservator.

West End Bank, S.B. is “well capitalized” under the prompt corrective action rules.

The recently proposed rules that would increase regulatory capital requirements would adjust the prompt corrective action categories accordingly.

Qualified Mortgages and Retention of Credit Risk

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has issued a rule designed to clarify for lenders how they can avoid legal liability under the Dodd-Frank Act, which would hold lenders accountable for ensuring a borrower’s ability to repay a mortgage. Loans that meet this “qualified mortgage” definition will be presumed to have complied with the new ability-to-repay standard. Under the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s rule, a “qualified mortgage” loan must not contain certain specified features, including:

excessive upfront points and fees (those exceeding 3% of the total loan amount, less “bona fide discount points” for prime loans);

interest-only payment;

negative-amortization; and

terms longer than 30 years

Also, to qualify as a “qualified mortgage,” a borrower’s total monthly debt-to-income ratio may not exceed 43%. Lenders must also verify and document the income and financial resources relied upon to qualify the borrow for the loan and underwrite the loan based on a fully amortizing payment schedule and maximum interest rate during the first five years, taking into account all applicable taxes, insurance and assessments. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s rule on qualified mortgages could limit our ability or desire to make certain types of loans or loans to certain borrowers, or could make it more expensive/and or time consuming to make these loans, which could limit our growth or profitability.

In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act requires the regulatory agencies to issue regulations that require securitizers of loans to retain not less than 5% of the credit risk for any assets that is not a “qualified residential mortgage.” The regulatory agencies have issued a proposed rule to implement this requirement. The Dodd-Frank Act provides that the definition of “qualified residential mortgage” can be no broader than the definition of “qualified mortgage” issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau for purposes of its regulations (as described above). Although the final rule with respect to the retention of credit risk has not yet been issued, the final rule could have a significant effect on the secondary market for loans and the types of loans we originate, and restrict our ability to make loans.

Other Regulations

Interest and other charges collected or contracted for by West End Bank, S.B. are subject to state usury laws and federal laws concerning interest rates. West End Bank, S.B.’s operations are also subject to federal and state laws applicable to credit transactions, such as the:

Truth-In-Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;

Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, requiring financial institutions to provide information to enable the public and public officials to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community it serves;

Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, creed or other prohibited factors in extending credit;

Fair Credit Reporting Act, governing the use and provision of information to credit reporting agencies;

Fair Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies;

Truth in Savings Act;

Indiana High Risk Home Loan Act, which protects borrowers who enter into high risk home loans;

Indiana Predatory Lending Database Program, which helps provide counseling for homebuyers in connection with certain loans; and

rules and regulations of the various federal and state agencies charged with the responsibility of implementing such laws.

The operations of West End Bank, S.B. also are subject to the:

Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records;

Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, which govern automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers’ rights and liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic banking services;

Check Clearing for the 21^st Century Act (also known as “Check 21”), which gives “substitute checks,” such as digital check images and copies made from that image, the same legal standing as the original paper check;

The USA PATRIOT Act, which requires savings banks operating to, among other things, establish broadened anti-money laundering compliance programs, due diligence policies and controls to ensure the detection and reporting of money laundering. Such required compliance programs are intended to supplement existing compliance requirements, also applicable to financial institutions, under the Bank Secrecy Act and the Office of Foreign Assets Control regulations; and

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which places limitations on the sharing of consumer financial information by financial institutions with unaffiliated third parties. Specifically, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires all financial institutions offering financial products or services to retail customers to provide such customers with the financial institution’s privacy policy and provide such customers the opportunity to “opt out” of the sharing of certain personal financial information with unaffiliated third parties.

Holding Company Regulation

General. West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. is a non-diversified unitary savings and loan holding company within the meaning of the Home Owners’ Loan Act. As such, West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. is registered with the Federal Reserve Board and subject to inspection and supervision by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. is subject to the Federal Reserve Board regulations (including applicable regulations of the former Office of Thrift Supervision), and reporting requirements. In addition, the Federal Reserve Board has enforcement authority over West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. and its non-insured subsidiaries. Among other things, this authority permits the Federal Reserve Board to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a serious risk to the subsidiary savings institution.

Capital. Savings and loan holding companies have not historically been subjected to consolidated regulatory capital requirements. However, the Dodd-Frank Act required the Federal Reserve Board to set for all depository institution holding companies minimum consolidated capital levels that are as stringent as those required for the insured depository subsidiaries. The previously discussed final rule regarding regulatory capital requirements implements the Dodd-Frank Act as to savings and loan holding companies. Consolidated regulatory capital requirements identical to those applicable to the subsidiary depository institutions will apply to savings and loan holding companies as of January 1, 2015. As is the case with institutions themselves, the capital conservation buffer will be phased in between 2016 and 2019.

Dividends. The Federal Reserve Board has issued a policy guidance regarding the payment of dividends by bank holding companies that it has made applicable to savings and loan holding companies as well. In general, the Federal Reserve Board’s policies provide that dividends should be paid only out of current earnings and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention by the holding company appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. Federal Reserve Board guidance provides for prior regulatory review of capital distributions in certain circumstances such as where the company’s net income for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid over that period, is insufficient to fully fund the dividend or the company’s overall rate of earnings retention is inconsistent with the company’s capital needs and overall financial condition. The ability of a holding company to pay dividends may be restricted if a subsidiary bank becomes undercapitalized. These regulatory policies could affect the ability of West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. to pay dividends or otherwise engage in capital distributions.

Source of Strength. The Dodd-Frank Act extended the “source of strength” doctrine to savings and loan holding companies. The regulatory agencies must issue regulations requiring that all bank and savings and loan holding companies serve as a source of strength to their subsidiary depository institutions by providing capital, liquidity and other support in times of financial stress.

Permissible Activities. Under present law, the business activities of West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. are generally limited to those activities permissible for financial holding companies under Section 4(k) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, or for multiple savings and loan holding companies. A financial holding company may engage in activities that are financial in nature, including underwriting equity securities and insurance as well as activities that are incidental to financial activities or complementary to a financial activity. A multiple savings and loan holding company is generally limited to activities permissible for bank holding companies under Section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding Company Act, subject to the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board, and certain additional activities authorized by Federal Reserve Board regulations.

Federal law prohibits a savings and loan holding company, including West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc., directly or indirectly, or through one or more subsidiaries, from acquiring more than 5% of another savings institution or holding company thereof, without prior written approval of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. It also prohibits the acquisition or retention of, with certain exceptions, more than 5% of a nonsubsidiary company engaged in activities that are not closely related to banking or financial in nature, or acquiring or retaining control of an institution that is not federally insured. In evaluating applications by holding companies to acquire savings institutions, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago must consider the financial and managerial resources, future prospects of the company and institution involved, the effect of the acquisition on the risk to the federal deposit insurance fund, the convenience and needs of the community and competitive factors.

The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago is prohibited from approving any acquisition that would result in a multiple savings and loan holding company controlling savings institutions in more than one state, subject to two exceptions:

(i)

the approval of interstate supervisory acquisitions by savings and loan holding companies; and

(ii)

the acquisition of a savings institution in another state if the laws of the state of the target savings institution specifically permit such acquisition.

The states vary in the extent to which they permit interstate savings and loan holding company acquisitions.

Federal Securities Laws

Our common stock is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We are subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 addresses, among other issues, corporate governance, auditing and accounting, executive compensation, and enhanced and timely disclosure of corporate information. As directed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are required to certify that our quarterly and annual reports do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact. The rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act have several requirements, including having these officers certify that: they are responsible for establishing, maintaining and regularly evaluating the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; they have made certain disclosures to our auditors and the audit committee of the Board of Directors about our internal control over financial reporting; and they have included information in our quarterly and annual reports about their evaluation and whether there have been changes in our internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that could materially affect internal control over financial reporting.

TAXATION

Federal Taxation

General. West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. and West End Bank, S.B. are subject to federal income taxation in the same general manner as other corporations, with some exceptions discussed below. The following discussion of federal taxation is intended only to summarize material federal income tax matters and is not a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. and West End Bank, S.B.

Method of Accounting. For federal income tax purposes, West End Bank, S.B. currently reports its income and expenses on the accrual method of accounting and uses a tax year ending December 31st for filing its consolidated federal income tax returns. The Small Business Protection Act of 1996 eliminated the use of the reserve method of accounting for bad debt reserves by savings institutions, effective for taxable years beginning after 1995.

Minimum Tax. The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, imposes an alternative minimum tax at a rate of 20% on a base of regular taxable income plus certain tax preferences, referred to as “alternative minimum taxable income.” The alternative minimum tax is payable to the extent alternative minimum taxable income is in excess of an exemption amount. Net operating losses can, in general, offset no more than 90% of alternative minimum taxable income. Certain payments of alternative minimum tax may be used as credits against regular tax liabilities in future years. At December 31, 2016, West End Bank, S.B. had no minimum tax credit carry forward.

Corporate Dividends. We may exclude from our income 100% of dividends received from West End Bank, S.B. as a member of the same affiliated group of corporations.

Audit of Tax Returns. West End Bank, S.B.’s federal income tax returns have not been audited in the most recent five-year period.

State Taxation

Indiana State Taxation. West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc., and West End Bank, S.B. are subject to Indiana’s Financial Institutions Tax (“FIT”), which is imposed at a flat rate of 8.0% on apportioned “adjusted gross income.” “Adjusted gross income,” for purposes of FIT, begins with taxable income as defined by Section 63 of the Code, and thus, incorporates federal tax law to the extent that it affects the computation of taxable income. Federal taxable income is then adjusted by several modifications pursuant to Indiana tax regulation.

Other applicable state taxes include generally applicable sales and use taxes plus real and personal property taxes. West End Bank, S.B.’s state income tax returns have not been audited in recent years.

Availability of Annual Report on Form 10-K

This Annual Report on Form 10-K is available on our website at www.westendbank.com. Information on the website is not incorporated into, and is not otherwise considered a part of, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

The presentation of Risk Factors is not required for smaller reporting companies such as West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

ITEM 2. Properties

As of December 31, 2016, the net book value of our office properties was $5.5 million. The following table sets forth information regarding our offices.

Location	Leased or Owned	Year Acquired or Leased	Square Footage	Net Book Value of Real Property
				(In thousands)
Main (Richmond) Office:

34 South 7th Street Richmond, Indiana 47374	Owned	1958	10,468	$	506

Other Properties:

Eastside Office and Mortgage Loan Center: 101 South 37th Street Richmond, Indiana 47374	Owned	2004	3,352		1,161

Hagerstown Office: 10 East Main Street Hagerstown, Indiana 47343	Owned	1962	1,300		154

Liberty Office: 207 North Main Street Liberty, Indiana 47353	Owned	2009	2,330		679

Other Properties: 48 South 7^th Street Richmond, Indiana 47374	Owned	2010	No building on site (adjacent to main office)		200

*45 South 7^th Street Richmond, Indiana 47374	Owned	1999	No building on site (adjacent to main office)		-

*37 South 7th Street Richmond, Indiana 47374	Owned	2011	No building on site (adjacent to main office)		-

102 South 8^th Street Richmond, Indiana 47374	Owned	2016	No building on site (adjacent to main office)		218

* Adjacent properties utilized for new construction of administration and operations building; construction in progress totals $2.6 million at December 31, 2016

ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings

On March 15, 2017, a complaint styled Audrey (Adams) Easler v. West End Bank, S.B., Case No. 89D02-17-3-CT-00001, Wayne County Circuit Court, Superior II, Richmond, Indiana, was served on West End Bank, S.B. (the “Bank”), naming it as defendant and alleging, among other things, that the Bank sent to the plaintiff a post-repossession notice that failed to include consumer rights required by the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) as enacted in Indiana, and that the Bank’s process of repossession violated the UCC. The complaint alleges that the named plaintiff is a representative of a class of plaintiffs and that the complaint would become a class action law suit. The complaint asks for both equitable relief and monetary damages. The Company believes the plaintiff’s claims are without merit and it intends to contest the action vigorously. At this time, it is not possible for the Company to estimate the loss or the range of possible loss in the event of an unfavorable outcome, as the ultimate resolution of the complaint is uncertain at this time. No amounts have been accrued as of December 31, 2016.

At December 31, 2016, other than as disclosed above, we were not involved in any pending legal proceedings other than routine legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business which, in the aggregate, involve amounts which management believes will not materially adversely affect our financial condition, our results of operations and our cash flows.

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

(a)

Market Information, Holders and Dividend Information. Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Pink Marketplace under the symbol “WEIN.” The number of holders of record of West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.’s common stock as of December 31, 2016 was 184. Certain shares of West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. are held in “nominee” or “street” name and accordingly, the number of beneficial owners of such shares is not known or included in the foregoing number.

The following table presents high and low quarterly trading prices for our shares and dividends declared per share for the periods indicated.

	High Sale		Low Sale		Dividends Declared
2016:
Quarter ended December 31	$	34.00	$	25.10	$	0.06
Quarter ended September 30		25.25		24.00		0.06
Quarter ended June 30		25.00		22.00		0.06
Quarter ended March 31		23.35		21.40		0.06

2015:
Quarter ended December 31	$	23.12	$	21.00	$	0.06
Quarter ended September 30		22.99		22.15		0.06
Quarter ended June 30		22.50		20.20		0.06
Quarter ended March 31		20.90		20.00		0.06

(b) Sales of Unregistered Securities. Not applicable.

(d) Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans. The following table sets forth the information as of December 31, 2016 with respect to compensation plans (other than the Company’s employee stock ownership plan) under which equity securities of the registrant are authorized for issuance.

		Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Weighted average exercise prices of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of common stock remaining available for future issuance under stock based compensation plan (excluding securities reflected in first column)
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders		158,966		$ 18.96		1,300
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders		––		––		––
	Total		158,966		$ 18.96		1,300

(e) Stock Repurchases. On May 25, 2016 the Board of Directors authorized a continuation of its stock repurchase program pursuant to which the Company may repurchase 5% of its common stock outstanding as of May 25, 2016, or approximately 56,000 shares.

The Following table present for the periods indicated a summary of the purchases made by on or behalf of the company of shares of its common stock.

	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
October 1, 2016 through October 31, 2016		8,600	$	25.18		8,600		25,806
November 1, 2016 through November 31, 2016		11,700	$	25.56		11,700		14,106
December 1 , 2016 through December 30, 2016		-		-		-		14,106

(f) Stock Performance Graph. Not required for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This section is intended to help a reader understand the financial performance of West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries through a discussion of the factors affecting our financial condition at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 and our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. This section should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements that appear elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

Our principal business consists of attracting retail deposits from the general public in our market area and investing those deposits, together with funds generated from operations, and to a lesser extent, borrowings, in one- to four-family residential real estate loans, indirect automobile loans, commercial and multi-family real estate loans, and, to a lesser extent, second mortgages and equity lines of credit, construction loans and commercial business loans. We also purchase investment securities consisting primarily of securities issued by United States Government agencies and government sponsored entities and mortgage-backed securities. At December 31, 2016, we had total assets of $287.1 million, total deposits of $224.9 million and total equity of $28.2 million.

Our results of operations depend primarily on our net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning assets and the interest we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities. Our results of operations also are affected by our provisions for loan losses, non-interest income and non-interest expense. Non-interest income currently consists primarily of service charges on deposit accounts, loan servicing income, gain on sales of securities and loans, debit card income, income from bank-owned life insurance and miscellaneous other income. Non-interest expense currently consists primarily of expenses related to compensation and employee benefits, occupancy and equipment, data processing, federal deposit insurance premiums, ATM charges, debit card charges, professional fees, advertising and other operating expenses.

Our results of operations also may be affected significantly by general and local economic and competitive conditions, changes in market interest rates, governmental policies and actions of regulatory authorities.

During recent years, in order to reduce our vulnerability to changes in interest rates and enhance our net interest rate spread, we have increased our acquisitions of indirect automobile loans and commercial and multi-family real estate loans. At December 31, 2016 our indirect automobile loan portfolio had an average life of 2 years 11 months which allows us to reinvest these funds into market-rate loans as interest rates change. Additionally, we sell the majority of our fixed-rate one- to four-family residential real estate loans that we originate. As part of our asset/liability management, we have also increased our core deposits (which we consider to be non-interest bearing and interest bearing checking, money market and statement savings accounts). Finally, we have also employed a strategy to shorten our investment portfolio maturities in recent years.

Business Strategy

We have focused primarily on improving the execution of our community oriented retail banking strategy. Highlights of our current business strategy include the following:

Increasing our holdings of loans other than one- to four-family residential real estate loans. While we will continue to emphasize one- to four-family residential real estate loans, we also intend, subject to market conditions, to increase our holdings of indirect automobile loans, commercial and multi-family real estate loans, and to a lesser extent, other consumer loans and commercial business loans, in order to increase the yield of, and reduce the term to repricing of, our total loan portfolio. Between December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2016, indirect loans and other consumer loans increased $38.6 million, or 68.5%, commercial and multi-family real estate loans increased $16.0 million, or 47.1%, and commercial business loans increased $3.7 million, or 42.9%, and we expect that these loan categories will continue to provide growth opportunities.

Continuing to emphasize the origination of one- to four-family residential real estate loans, while increasing, to the extent practicable, the amount of our adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans. We are and will continue to be a one- to four-family residential real estate lender to borrowers in our market area. As of December 31, 2016, $65.2 million, or 27.7%, of our total loans and 22.7% of our total assets consisted of one- to four-family residential real estate loans, compared to $56.1 million, or 34.7%, of total loans and 22.8% of total assets at December 31, 2012. To the extent practicable under applicable market conditions, we seek to emphasize the origination of adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans for retention in our portfolio.

Managing interest rate risk, including following our strategy of selling most of our fixed-rate one- to four-family residential real estate loans into the secondary market, while attempting to maximize, to the extent practicable, our net interest margin. During the last several years, we have taken steps that are intended to increase our net interest margin as well as our ability to manage our interest rate risk in the future. In particular, we have increased our holdings of indirect automobile loans and commercial and multi-family real estate loans, which generally have shorter terms to maturity and higher yields than fixed-rate one- to four-family residential real estate loans. We have also reduced the average maturity in our investment securities portfolio. In addition, we perform on an ongoing basis, an asset/liability management analysis to determine the amount of fixed-rates loans to sell, and in recent years, based on these ongoing analyses, we have sold most of our fixed-rate one- to four-family residential real estate loans that we originate, while retaining the servicing rights.

Maintaining strong asset quality. We have sought to build strong asset quality by following conservative underwriting guidelines, sound loan administration, and generally focusing on secured loans located in our market area. Our non-performing assets and troubled debt restructurings totaled $4.0 million or 1.41% of total assets at December 31, 2016. Our total nonperforming loans and troubled debt restructurings to total loans ratio was 0.56% at December 31, 2016. Total loan delinquencies greater than 90 days and non-accrual loans, as of December 31, 2016, were $1.3 million, or 0.55% of total loans.

Executing our cross-marketing strategy, including community outreach programs, to enhance our profile in our market area, increase our relationships with small- to mid-sized businesses and professionals, and build our core deposits. We are seeking to build our demand, NOW, statement savings and money market deposits and seeking to reduce our reliance on borrowings and certificates of deposit for liquidity purposes and to fund loan demand. We believe such core deposits not only have favorable cost and interest rate change resistance but also allow us greater opportunity to connect with our customers and offer them other financial services and products. In recent years, we have grown our core deposits from commercial business customers through our various marketing strategies. Those strategies include our Business Links program (a suite of services provided to small- and mid-sized businesses and professionals in our market area), deposit pick up service, remote capture, mobile banking, enhanced online banking, electronic statements and social media implementation on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. Our school branch program in an elementary school and a high school in Richmond, Indiana provides limited-service branches operated by students as well as financial education classes taught by West End Bank, S.B. employees. Additionally, our new charitable foundation that we established in connection with the conversion and stock offering will provide us continued opportunities to grow our brand recognition in our market area.

Critical Accounting Policies

We consider accounting policies that require management to exercise significant judgment or discretion or make significant assumptions that have, or could have, a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets or on income, to be critical accounting policies. We consider the following to be our critical accounting policies:

Allowance for Loan Losses. Our allowance for loan losses is the estimated amount considered necessary to reflect probable incurred credit losses in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is established through the provision for loan losses, which is charged against income. In determining the allowance for loan losses, management makes significant estimates and has identified this policy as one of the most critical for West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. The methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting policy by management due to the high degree of judgment involved, the subjectivity of the assumptions utilized and the potential for changes in the economic environment that could result in changes to the amount of the recorded allowance for loan losses.

Since a substantial amount of our loan portfolio is collateralized by real estate, appraisals of the underlying value of property securing loans and discounted cash flow valuations of properties are critical in determining the amount of the allowance required for specific loans. Assumptions for appraisals and discounted cash flow valuations are instrumental in determining the value of properties. Overly optimistic assumptions or negative changes to assumptions could significantly impact the valuation of a property securing a loan and the related allowance determined. The assumptions supporting such appraisals and discounted cash flow valuations are carefully reviewed by management to determine that the resulting values reasonably reflect amounts realizable on the related loans.

Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the allowance for loan losses. Consideration is given to a variety of factors in establishing this estimate including, but not limited to, current economic conditions, delinquency statistics, geographic and industry concentrations, the value of the underlying collateral, the financial strength of the borrower, results of internal loan reviews and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revision based on changes in economic and real estate market conditions.

The analysis of the allowance for loan losses has two components: specific and general allocations. Specific allocations are made for loans that are determined to be impaired. Impairment loss is measured by determining the present value of expected future cash flows or, for collateral-dependent loans, the fair value of the collateral adjusted for market conditions and selling expenses. The general allocation is determined by segregating classified loans from the remaining loans, and then categorizing each group by type of loan. Loans within each type exhibit common characteristics including terms, collateral type, and other risk characteristics. We also analyze historical loss experience, delinquency trends, general economic conditions and geographic and industry concentrations. This analysis establishes factors that are applied to the loan groups to determine the amount of the general allocations.

Mortgage Servicing Rights. We sell to investors a portion of our originated one- to four-family residential real estate loans. When we acquire mortgage servicing rights through the origination of mortgage loans and the sale of those loans with servicing rights retained, we allocate a portion of the total cost of the mortgage loans to the mortgage servicing rights based on their relative fair value. As of December 31, 2016, we were servicing loans sold to others totaling $69.7 million. We have elected to initially and subsequently measure the mortgage-servicing rights for residential mortgage loans using the fair value method. Under the fair value method, the servicing rights are carried in the balance sheet at fair value and the changes in fair value are reported in earnings in the period in which the changes occur.

Fair value is based on market prices for comparable mortgage-servicing contracts, when available, or alternatively, is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The valuation model calculates the present value of the future net servicing cash flows, taking into consideration actual and expected mortgage loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs and other economic factors, which are determined based on current market conditions. The valuation model uses a discounted cash flow methodology. These variables change from quarter to quarter as market conditions and projected interest rates change, and may have an adverse impact on the value of the mortgage-servicing right and may result in a reduction to our other income.

The key economic assumptions made in determining the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights at December 31, 2016 included the following:

Annual constant prepayment speed (CPR):	10.3	%

Weighted average life remaining:	4.13 years

Discount rate used:	5.9	%

Servicing fee income is recorded for fees earned for servicing loans. The fees are based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal or a fixed amount per loan and are recorded as income when earned. The amortization of mortgage-servicing rights is netted against loan servicing fee income.

Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015

Total assets increased $16.1 million, or 5.9%, to $287.1 million at December 31, 2016. The increase was a result of increases in loans, other assets, premises and equipment, and other real estate owned, partially offset by decreases in investment securities classified as available for sale, and loans held for sale.

Cash and cash equivalents increased $812,000, or 11.9%, to $7.6 million at December 31, 2016, based on normal operations and cash flow. Bank-owned life insurance increased to $6.8 million at December 31, 2016 from $5.3 million at December 31, 2015 with the increase to cash surrender value and purchase of additional coverage for key employees. Securities classified as available for sale decreased $4.4 million, or 15.6%, to $23.7 million at December 31, 2016 from $28.1 million at December 31, 2015 with proceeds from sales and normal cash flow utilized to fund loan growth. Additionally, loans held for sale decreased to $346,000, from $1.7 million, due to the sale of the guaranteed portion of an SBA commercial loan.

Premises and equipment increased $2.5 million to $6.1 million in 2016 from $3.6 million in 2015 due to the construction of administration and operations offices. Other assets increased to $5.0 million at December 31, 2016 from $4.3 million at December 31, 2015. Other real estate owned increased $1.7 million to $2.5 million in 2016 from $808,000 in 2015 with the foreclosure of a commercial credit for land development.

Net loans increased $14.6 million, or 6.7%, to $232.6 million at December 31, 2016 from $218.0 million at December 31, 2015. Commercial and industrial non-real estate loans decreased $1.9 million to $12.2 million from $14.1 million and commercial and multi-family real estate loans increased $2.3 million, or 4.9%, to $50.1 million from $47.7 million. One to four-family residential loans increased $4.2 million, or 6.9% to $65.2 million from $61.0 million and second mortgages and equity lines of credit increased $195,000, or 3.5%, to $5.7 million from $5.5 million. The most significant growth was the consumer loan portfolio which increased $6.5 million, or 7.3%, to $95.0 million. Included within consumer loans, direct consumer loans increased $431,000 to $15.8 million, and indirect loans increased $6.0 million to $79.2 million from $73.2 million.

Deposits increased $9.6 million, or 4.5%, to $224.9 million from $215.3 million year to year. Core deposits, including savings, interest bearing and non-interest bearing checking, and money market deposit accounts, increased $9.7 million to $116.4 million at December 31, 2016 from $106.7 million at December 31, 2015. Savings accounts increased $3.4 million or 18.5%, to $21.6 million at December 31, 2016, interest bearing and non-interest bearing checking accounts increased $6.2 million, or 12.4%, to $56.1 million at December 31, 2016 while money market deposit accounts increased $162,000 or 0.4% to $38.7 million at December 31, 2016 from $38.5 million at December 31, 2015. Certificates of deposit decreased $83,000, or 0.1% to $108.5 million at December 31, 2016 from $108.6 million at December 31, 2015.

Borrowings, which consisted entirely of Federal Home Loan Bank advances, increased $5.0 million, or 18.5%, to $32.0 million at December 31, 2016 from $27.0 million at December 31, 2015.

Total stockholders’ equity increased $798,000, or 2.9%, to $28.2 million at December 31, 2016 from $27.4 million at December 31, 2015. The increase was a result of net income of $1.8 million during 2016 and stock based benefits of $425,000, offset by stock repurchases of $1.0 million, cash dividends of $241,000, and changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $187,000.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

General. Net income remained unchanged at $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from December 31, 2015. Changes to net income resulted primarily from an increase in net interest income of $569,000, an increase to other income of $364,000, and a decrease in income tax expense of $41,000 partially offset by increases to the provision for loan losses of $354,000, and noninterest expense of $614,000.

Interest Income. Interest income increased to $13.6 million for 2016 from $12.9 million for 2015. The average balance of total interest earning assets increased $8.8 million, or 3.4% to $263.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $254.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The average yield on total interest earning assets increased 11 basis points to 5.17% for 2016 from 5.06% for 2015 due to the increased average balance of the loan portfolio partially offset by the decrease in average balance of the lower yielding investment portfolio.

Interest income and fees on loans increased to $13.1 million for 2016 from $12.1 million in 2015. The average yield on loans decreased eight basis points to 5.74% for the year ended December 31, 2016 from 5.82% for the year ended December 31, 2015. However, the decline in loan yield was entirely offset by an increase of $19.7 million, or 9.4%, in the average balance of loans to $228.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $208.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Interest income on investment securities decreased to $435,000 from $673,000 the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 respectively due to a decrease in the average balance and a decrease in the yield to 1.74% in 2016 from 1.86% in 2015. The decrease of $11.1 million to the average balance of investment securities to $25.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $36.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 reflects management’s overall funding strategy for loan growth.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $170,000, or 9.8%, to $1.9 million for 2016 from $1.7 million in 2015 reflecting an increase in the average balance of interest bearing liabilities and the markets move toward higher interest rates. The average balance of interest bearing deposit accounts increased to $199.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $189.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, the interest paid on these liabilities also increased $205,000 to $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.

The average balance of interest bearing demand deposits (savings, checking and money market accounts) increased $3.8 million to $91.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $88.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The average balance of interest bearing checking accounts increased $2.4 million at December 31, 2016, and the average balance of savings accounts increased $3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 while the average balance of money market accounts decreased $1.8 million.

Interest expense paid on certificates of deposit increased $204,000, or 19.2%, to $1.3 million for the year ended 2016 from $1.1 million for 2015. The increase reflected an increase in the average balance of certificates of deposit of $6.1 million or 6.0%, to $107.5 for 2016 from $101.4 for 2015. Additionally the average interest paid also increased as the average rate increased 13 basis point to 1.18% for the year ended December 31, 2016 from 1.05% for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Interest expense on borrowed funds, consisting entirely of Federal Home Loan Bank advances, decreased $35,000, or 7.6% to $427,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $462,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The average balance of advances increased to $30.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $29.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, the average rate paid decreased 17 basis points to an average rate of 1.40% for the year ended December 31, 2016 from 1.57% for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $569,000, or 5.1% to $11.7 million for December 31, 2016 from $11.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was due to the increase in interest income on loans of $972,000 to $13.1 million from $12.1 million offset by decreases in securities of $238,000 to $435,000 from $673,000, and increase in interest expense on deposits of $205,000 to $1.5 million from $1.3 million and a decrease in the cost of borrowings of $35,000 to $427,000 from $462,000.

Provision for Loan Losses. Based on our analysis of the factors described in “Critical Account Policies – Allowance for Loan Losses,” we recorded a provision for loan losses of $1.9 million for 2016 and $1.5 million for 2015. The allowance for loan losses was $2.3 million, or 0.97% to total loans outstanding at December 31, 2016, compared to $2.2 million, or 1.0% of total loans outstanding at December 31, 2015. Total nonperforming loans were $1.3 million, or 0.56% of total loans outstanding at December 31, 2016 compared to $4.0 million, or 1.83% of total loans outstanding at December 31, 2015. Nonperforming loans decreased primarily due to a $2.2 million commercial property that was transferred to foreclosed real estate held for sale. The increase to the provision reflected net charge offs and increased loan volume during 2016, and specifically an increase in the indirect automobile segment of the portfolio. The allowance for loan losses as percentage of nonperforming loans increased to 174.6% at December 31, 2016, from 54.4% at December 31, 2015. While non-performing loans declined, the provision for loan losses increase based on management analysis of historical chargeoffs and increased loan volume.

Noninterest Income. Noninterest income increased 364,000, or 22.9%, to $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, from $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was due primarily to a $97,000 increase in realized gains on sales of available for sale securities. Gains on sale of loans increased $383,000 to $739,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $356,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015 due to the gain on sale of the guaranteed portion of SBA loans. Offsetting these increases in noninterest income, net loss on sale and writedowns other assets increased $270,000 to $244,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $26,000 gain on the sale of assets for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense increased $614,000, or 7.3%, to $9.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $8.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was due to a $254,000 increase in salaries and employee benefits, a $165,000 increase in foreclosed real estate and repossession expense, a $73,000 increase in data processing fees, and an increase in software expense of $63,000. Offsetting these increases we had a decrease in professional fees of $71,000.

Income tax expense. We recorded $950,000 of income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $991,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015, reflecting pre-tax income of $2.8 million for both 2016 and 2015. Our effective tax rate was 34.0% for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to 35.0% for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Analysis of Net Interest Income

Net interest income represents the difference between the income we earn on interest-earning assets and the interest expense we pay on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income also depends upon the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest rates earned or paid on them. The following tables set forth average balance sheets, average yields and costs, and certain other information at or for the periods indicated. Average balances are derived from daily average balances. Non-accrual loans were included in the computation of average balances, but have been reflected in the tables as loans carrying a zero yield. No tax equivalent yield adjustments have been made. The yields set forth below include the effect of loan fees, discounts and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income.

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2016							2015							2014
	Average Balance		Interest and Dividends		Yield/ Cost			Average Balance		Interest and Dividends		Yield/ Cost			Average Balance		Interest and Dividends		Yield/ Cost
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Assets:
Interest-earning assets:

Loans	$	228,328	$	13,104		5.74	%	$	208,602	$	12,132		5.82	%	$	184,416	$	10,799		5.86	%
Investment securities		25,023		435		1.74			36,099		673		1.86			53,224		1,030		1.94
Other interest-earning assets		9,970		74		0.74			9,824		69		0.70			8,563		79		0.92
Total interest-earning assets		263,321		13,613		5.17			254,525		12,874		5.06			246,203		11,908		4.84

Noninterest-earning assets		18,237							14,349							11,767
Total assets	$	281,558						$	268,874						$	257,970

Liabilities and equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Checking	$	32,869		45		0.14		$	30,423		39		0.13		$	30,429		40		.13
Money Market		38,543		151		0.39			40,389		159		0.39			40,079		160		.40
Savings		20,439		25		0.12			17,265		22		0.13			15,950		19		.12
Certificates and other time deposits of $100,000 or more		107,484		1,265		1.18			101,386		1,061		1.05			95,498		992		1.04
Total interest-bearing deposits		199,335		1,486		0.75			189,463		1,281		0.68			181,956		1,211		.67

FHLB advances		30,418		427		1.40			29,340		462		1.57			26,899		398		1.48
Total interest-bearing liabilities		229,753		1,913		0.83			218,803		1,743		0.80			208,855		1,609		.77

Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		21,757							18,661							16,862
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities		1,382							1,473							1,210
Total liabilities		252,892							238,937							226,927

Total equity		28,666							29,937							31,043
Total liabilities and equity	$	281,558						$	268,874						$	257,970

Net interest income			$	11,700						$	11,131						$	10,299
Interest rate spread						4.34	%						4.26	%						4.07	%
Net interest margin						4.44	%						4.37	%						4.18	%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities						114.61	%						116.33	%						117.88	%

Rate/Volume Analysis

The following table presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for the major categories of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Information is provided for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities with respect to (i) changes attributable to changes in volume (i.e., changes in average balances multiplied by the prior-period average rate) and (ii) changes attributable to rate (i.e., changes in average rate multiplied by prior-period average balances). For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately to the change due to volume and the change due to rate.

	Years Ended December 31, 2016 vs. 2015									Years Ended December 31, 2015 vs. 2014
	Increase (Decrease) Due to						Total Increase			Increase (Decrease) Due to						Total Increase
	Volume			Rate			(Decrease)			Volume			Rate			(Decrease)

Interest income:
Loans receivable	$	1,134		$	(162	)	$	972		$	1,602		$	(269	)	$	1,333
Investment securities		(195	)		(43	)		(238	)		(368	)		11			(357	)
Other interest-earning assets		1			4			5			(6	)		(4	)		(10	)
Total		940			(201	)		739			1,228			(262	)		966

Interest expense:
Deposits		69			136			205			27			43			70
FHLB advances		17			(52	)		(35	)		23			41			64
Total		86			84			170			50			84			134
Increase (decrease) in net interest income	$	854		$	(285	)	$	569		$	1,178		$	(346	)	$	832

Management of Market Risk

Our asset/liability management strategy attempts to manage the impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income, our primary source of earnings.

Historically, we have relied on funding longer-term, higher interest-earning assets with shorter- term, lower interest-bearing deposits to earn a favorable net interest rate spread. As a result, we have been vulnerable to adverse changes in interest rates. Over the past several years, management has implemented an asset/liability strategy to manage, subject to our profitability goals, our interest rate risk. Among the techniques we are currently using to manage interest rate risk are:

originating indirect automobile loans and other consumer loans, commercial and multi-family real estate loans and secured commercial business loans, all of which tend to have shorter terms and higher interest rates than one- to four-family residential real estate loans, and which generate customer relationships that can result in larger non-interest bearing demand deposit accounts;

selling most of our long-term, fixed-rate one- to four-family residential real estate loans that we originate;

lengthening the weighted average maturity of our liabilities through retail deposit pricing strategies and through longer-term wholesale funding sources such as fixed-rate advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis;

reducing our dependence on the acquisition of certificates of deposits and wholesale funding to support lending and investment activity;

investing in shorter- to medium-term investment securities; and

increasing other income as a percentage of total income.

Our Board of Directors is responsible for the review and oversight of our Asset/Liability Committee, which is comprised of our executive management team and other essential operational staff. This committee is charged with developing and implementing an asset/liability management plan, and meets at least quarterly to review pricing and liquidity needs and assess our interest rate risk. We currently utilize a third-party modeling program, prepared on a quarterly basis, to evaluate our sensitivity to changing interest rates, given our business strategy, operating environment, capital, liquidity and performance objectives, and for managing this risk consistent with the guidelines approved by the Board of Directors.

We use an earnings simulation analysis that measures the sensitivity of net interest income to various interest rate movements. The base-case scenario is established using current interest rates. The comparative scenarios assume an immediate parallel shock in increments of 100 basis point (bp) rate movements. A basis point equals one-hundredth of one percent, and 100 basis points equals one percent. An increase in interest rates from 3% to 4% would mean, for example, a 100 basis point increase in the “Change in Interest Rates” column below. The model is run at least quarterly showing shocks from -300bp to +300bp. At least annually, the model is run with a shock of +400bp along with a -300bp to +300bp with a non-parallel rate shift, meaning short-term and long-term rates would not move in equal increments.

The interest rate scenarios are used for analytical purposes and do not necessarily represent management’s view of future market movements. Results of the modeling are used to provide a measure of the degree of volatility interest rate movements may influence our earnings. Modeling the sensitivity of earnings to interest rate risk is decidedly reliant on numerous assumptions embedded in the model. These assumptions include, but are not limited to, management’s best assessment of the effect of changing interest rates on the prepayment speeds of certain assets and liabilities, projections for account balances in each of the product lines offered and the historical behavior of deposit rates and balances in relation to changes in interest rates. These assumptions are inherently changeable, and as a result, the model is not expected to precisely measure net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in interest rate on net interest income. Actual results will differ from the simulated results due to timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions. Assumptions are supported with annual back testing of the model to actual market rate shifts.

The table below sets forth, as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the estimated changes in our net interest income that would result from the designated immediate changes in the United States Treasury yield curve. In the below table, “12 Month Horizon” and “24 Month Horizon” represent the assumed length of time for which the designated immediate change in the interest rate would remain effective. Computations of prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on numerous assumptions including relative levels of market interest rates, loan prepayments and deposit decay, and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results.

	At December 31,
	2016			2015
Change in Interest Rates (basis points)	Net Interest Change as a Percentage of Net Interest Income
12 Month Horizon
+400		(9.70	)%		(6.68	)%
+300		(3.12	)%		(1.25	)%
+200		(2.41	)%		(0.74	)%
+100		(1.76	)%		(0.33	)%
0		(1.32	)%		(0.15	)%
-100		(1.58	)%		(0.69	)%

24 Month Horizon
+400		(13.16	)%		(5.83	)%
+300		(9.52	)%		(4.91	)%
+200		(7.03	)%		(2.98	)%
+100		(4.95	)%		(1.54	)%
0		(3.72	)%		(0.91	)%
-100		(4.34	)%		(2.03	)%

The table above indicates that at December 31, 2016, in the event of a 200 basis point increase in interest rates, assuming a 12 month horizon, our net interest income would decline 2.41%. In the event of a 100 basis point decrease in interest rates, assuming a 12 month horizon, our net interest income would decline by 1.58%. A rising rate environment over a 24-month period shows even less favorable decreases to our net interest income than the correlating rate change over a 12-month period.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and securities, proceeds from sale of loans, proceeds from maturities and calls of securities, and Federal Home Loan Bank advances. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions, and competition. Our most liquid assets are cash and short-term investments including interest-bearing demand deposits. The levels of these assets are dependent on our operating, financing, lending, and investing activities during any given period.

Our cash flows are comprised of three primary classifications: cash flows from operating activities, investing activities, and financing activities. Net cash provided by operating activities was $5.7 million and $1.7 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively. Net cash used in investing activities, which consists primarily of disbursements for loan originations and the purchase of securities, offset by principal collections on loans, proceeds from the sale securities and proceeds from maturing securities and pay downs on mortgage-backed securities, was $18.2 million and $14.0 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively. The 2016 period reflected a net change in loans of $18.6 million while the 2015 period reflected a net change in loans of $28.2 million. Net cash provided by financing activities, consisting primarily of the activity in deposit accounts was $13.3 million and $9.3 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively, resulting from our strategy of growing our certificate of deposit accounts and a general growth in all core deposit categories resulting from customers seeking the relative stability of insured accounts in the uncertain economic environment.

At December 31, 2016, we exceeded all of our regulatory capital and well capitalized requirements with a Tier 1 (core) capital level of $27.4 million, or 9.6% of adjusted total assets, which is above the required regulatory capital level of $11.4 million, or 4.0% and well capitalized level of $14.3 million, or 5.0%; and total risk-based capital of $29.7 million, or 13.2% of risk-weighted assets, which is above the required level of $18.0 million, or 8.0% and well capitalized level of $22.5 million, or 10%. Management is not aware of any conditions or events since the most recent notification that would change our category.

At December 31, 2016, we had outstanding commitments to originate loans of $13.8 million and stand-by letters of credit of $461,000. We anticipate that we will have sufficient funds available to meet our current loan origination commitments. Certificates of deposit that are scheduled to mature in less than one year from December 31, 2016 totaled $59.4 million. Management expects that a substantial portion of the maturing certificates of deposit will be renewed. However, if a substantial portion of these deposits is not retained, we may utilize Federal Home Loan Bank advances or raise interest rates on deposits to attract new accounts, which may result in higher levels of interest expense.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. In the normal course of operations, we engage in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, are not recorded in our financial statements. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity risk. Such transactions are used primarily to manage customers’ requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments, lines of credit and standby letters of credit. For information about our loan commitments, unused lines of credit and standby letters of credit, see Note 9 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-1 of this annual report.

We have not engaged in any other off-balance-sheet transactions in the normal course of our lending activities.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

For a discussion of the impact of recent accounting pronouncements, see Note 18 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements beginning on page F-1 of this annual report.

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

The financial statements and related data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The primary impact of inflation on our operations is reflected in increased operating costs. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates, generally, have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than does inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.

ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K beginning at page F-1.

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2016 and 2015

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015
and Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2

Consolidated Financial Statements

Balance Sheets	F-3

Statements of Income	F-4

Statements of Comprehensive Income	F-5

Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	F-6

Statements of Cash Flows	F-7

Notes to Financial Statements	F-8

F-1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Audit Committee, Board of Directors and Stockholders

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Richmond, Indiana

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. (Company) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended. The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing auditing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. Our audits also included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

BKD, llp

Indianapolis, Indiana

March 30, 2017

F-2

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheet

December 31, 2016 and 2015

	December 31,
	2016			2015

Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	2,039,032		$	1,474,318
Interest-bearing demand deposits		5,610,324			5,363,107
Cash and cash equivalents		7,649,356			6,837,425
Investment securities available for sale		23,727,778			28,100,901
Loans held for sale		346,409			1,668,264
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $2,276,679 and $2,192,709 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively		232,649,433			218,008,838
Premises and equipment		6,111,527			3,583,353
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,328,900			1,323,000
Interest receivable		1,036,536			1,079,875
Bank-owned life insurance		6,783,218			5,279,009
Foreclosed real estate held for sale		2,502,589			807,702
Other assets		4,968,194			4,334,433

Total assets	$	287,103,940		$	271,022,800

Liabilities and Equity

Liabilities
Deposits	$	224,897,992		$	215,278,068
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		32,000,000			27,000,000
Interest payable		82,137			75,412
Other liabilities		1,921,413			1,265,015
Total liabilities		258,901,542			243,618,495

Commitments and Contingencies

Redeemable common stock held by Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)		660,957			-

Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock, $.01 par value per share: Issued and outstanding – 1,064,582 and 1,106,476 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively		10,646			11,065
Additional paid in capital		5,690,352			6,367,059
Retained earnings		23,687,416			22,081,030
Unearned employee stock ownership plan (ESOP)		(840,600	)		(896,640	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(345,416	)		(158,209	)

Total stockholders’ equity		28,202,398			27,404,305

Less maximum cash obligation related to ESOP shares		(660,957	)

Total stockholders’ equity less maximum cash obligation related to ESOP shares		27,541,441			27,404,305

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	287,103,940		$	271,022,800

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-3

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Income

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

	Years Ended December 31,
	2016			2015

Interest and Dividend Income
Loans receivable, including fees	$	13,104,478		$	12,131,932
Investment securities		435,075			673,216
Other		73,912			69,034
Total interest income		13,613,465			12,874,182

Interest Expense
Deposits		1,486,252			1,281,381
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		427,312			462,245
Total interest expense		1,913,564			1,743,626

Net Interest Income		11,699,901			11,130,556
Provision for loan losses		1,861,281			1,507,000
Net Interest After Provision for Loan Losses		9,838,620			9,623,556

Other Income
Service charges on deposit accounts		652,764			566,556
Loan servicing income, net		148,304			104,519
Debit card income		354,802			310,020
Gain on sale of loans		738,650			355,532
Net realized gains on sales of available-for-sale securities (includes $135,336, and $37,865 respectively, related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings reclassifications)		135,336			37,865
Gain on cash surrender value of life insurance		164,208			127,387
Gain (loss) on sale and writedowns of other assets		(244,138	)		26,147
Other income		2,051			60,356
Total other income		1,951,977			1,588,382

Other Expense
Salaries and employee benefits		5,021,359			4,767,503
Net occupancy		572,903			505,498
Data processing fees		389,007			316,272
Professional fees		425,132			496,127
Director expenses		141,660			177,067
Advertising		264,668			253,108
ATM charges		288,882			259,580
Postage and courier		232,446			226,436
FDIC insurance premiums		187,500			200,982
Software expense		188,183			125,396
Foreclosed real estate and repossession expense		259,277			94,190
Other expenses		1,022,644			957,660
Total other expenses		8,993,661			8,379,819

Income Before Income Tax		2,796,936			2,832,119
Income tax expense (includes $53,607 and $14,998, respectively, related to income tax expense from reclassification items)		949,862			991,173

Net Income	$	1,847,074		$	1,840,946
Earnings Per Share
Basic	$	1.83		$	1.58
Diluted		1.79			1.57
Dividends Per Share		0.24			0.24

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-4

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

	Years Ended December 31,
	2016			2015

Net income	$	1,847,074		$	1,840,946
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
Unrealized holding loss arising during the period, net of tax benefit of $69,130 and $20,462		(105,478	)		(31,220	)
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of tax expense of $53,607 and $14,998		81,729			22,867
		(187,207	)		(54,087	)
Comprehensive income	$	1,659,867		$	1,786,859

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-5

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

	Common Stock
	Shares Outstanding			Amount			Additional Paid- In Capital			Retained Earnings			Unearned ESOP Shares			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Maximum Cash Obligation Related to ESOP Shares			Total Stockholder's Equity
Balances at January 1, 2015		1,329,880		$	13,299		$	10,979,452		$	20,513,341		$	(952,680	)	$	(104,122	)				$	30,449,290
Net income		-			-			-			1,840,946			-			-						1,840,946
Other comprehensive loss		-			-			-			-			-			(54,087	)					(54,087	)
ESOP shares earned		-			-			64,530			-			56,040			-						120,570
Stock Based Compensation Expense		-			-			282,875			-			-			-						282,875
Shares Repurchased		(223,404	)		(2,234	)		(4,959,798	)		-			-			-						(4,962,032	)
Cash dividends ($0.24) per share		-			-			-			(273,257	)		-			-						(273,257	)

Balances at December 31, 2015		1,106,476			11,065			6,367,059			22,081,030			(896,640	)		(158,209	)		-			27,404,305
Net income		-			-			-			1,847,074			-			-			-			1,847,074
Other comprehensive loss		-			-			-			-			-			(187,207	)		-			(187,207	)
ESOP shares earned		-			-			79,857			-			56,040			-			-			135,897
Change related to ESOP shares																				(660,957	)		(660,957	)
Stock Based Compensation Expense		-			-			289,194			-			-			-			-			289,194
Shares Repurchased		(41,894	)		(419	)		(1,045,758	)		-			-			-			-			(1,046,177	)
Cash dividends ($0.24) per share		-			-			-			(240,688	)		-			-			-			(240,688	)
Balances at December 31, 2016		1,064,582		$	10,646		$	5,690,352		$	23,687,416		$	(840,600	)	$	(345,416	)	$	(660,957	)	$	27,541,441

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-6

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

	Years Ended December 31,
	2016			2015

Operating Activities
Net income	$	1,847,074		$	1,840,946
Items not requiring (providing) cash
Provision for loan losses		1,861,281			1,507,000
Depreciation and amortization		291,341			242,009
Deferred income taxes		83,313			(31,215	)
Investment securities amortization, net		332,838			419,811
Investment securities gains		(135,336	)		(37,865	)
Loan originated for sale		(14,697,998	)		(17,670,292	)
Proceeds on loan sold		16,813,293			16,257,120
Gain on loans sold		(738,650	)		(355,532	)
Loss (gain) on other assets		244,138			(26,147	)
ESOP shares earned		135,897			120,570
Stock based compensation		289,194			282,875
Net change in
Interest receivable		43,339			(50,234	)
Interest payable		6,725			10,279
Cash surrender value of life insurance		(164,209	)		(127,387	)
Other adjustments		(523,982	)		(705,522	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		5,688,258			1,676,416

Investing Activities
Purchases of securities available for sale		(10,619,965	)		(482,955	)
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale		4,209,332			5,378,964
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale		10,276,310			9,070,186
Purchase of FHLB stock		(5,900	)		-
Proceeds from redemption of FHLB stock		-			174,000
Net change in loans		(18,567,736	)		(28,253,655	)
Purchase of premises and equipment		(2,273,749	)		(366,051	)
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed real estate		112,322			466,344
Purchase of bank owned life insurance		(1,340,000	)		-
Net cash used in investing activities		(18,209,386	)		(14,013,167	)

Financing Activities
Net change in demand deposits, money market, NOW, and savings accounts		9,703,025			943,190
Net change in certificates of deposit		(83,101	)		10,604,577
Repurchased shares		(1,046,177	)		(4,962,032	)
Repayment of FHLB advances		(45,000,000	)		(8,000,000	)
Proceeds from FHLB advances		50,000,000			11,000,000
Cash dividends		(240,688	)		(273,257	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		13,333,059			9,312,478

Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents		811,931			(3,024,273	)

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period		6,837,425			9,861,698

Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period	$	7,649,356		$	6,837,425

Additional Cash Flows Information
Interest paid	$	1,908,597		$	1,733,347
Income tax paid		1,057,000			1,010,000
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans		1,974,589			1,051,296
Sale and financing of foreclosed real estate		58,373			112,068

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-7

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

Note 1: Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations and Conversion

West End Bank, S.B. (the “Bank”), a wholly owned subsidiary of West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”), is an Indiana-chartered savings bank that was organized in 1894 and is headquartered in Richmond, Indiana.

The Bank provides financial services to individuals, families and businesses through its four banking offices located in the Indiana counties of Union and Wayne and limited service branches located in the elementary schools and high school in Richmond, Indiana at which the Bank offers more limited banking services and at which it provides banking seminars to students who assist in the branch operations. Our principal business consists of attracting retail deposits from the general public in our market area and investing those deposits, together with funds generated from operations, and to a lesser extent, borrowings, in one- to four- family residential real estate loans, indirect automobile loans, commercial and multi-family real estate loans, and to a lesser extent, second mortgages and equity lines of credit, construction loans and commercial business loans. We also purchase investment securities consisting of municipal bonds, and mortgage-backed securities.

The Bank reorganized into a mutual holding company structure in 2007. On January 11, 2012, in accordance with a Plan of Conversion and Reorganization ( the “Conversion”), West End Bank, MHC (MHC), the Bank’s former federally chartered mutual holding company completed a mutual-to-stock conversion pursuant to which the Bank became the wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, a Maryland corporation. In connection with the Conversion, the Company sold 1,363,008 shares of common stock, at an offering price of $10 per share, and issued an additional 38,000 shares of its common stock to the West End Bank Charitable Foundation (the “Foundation”), resulting in an aggregate issuance of 1,401,008 shares of common stock. The Company’s stock began being quoted on the OTC Pink Marketplace on January 11, 2012, under the symbol “WEIN.”

The proceeds from the stock offering net of issuance costs of $1,092,000 amounted to $12,537,000.

Also, in connection with the Conversion, the Bank established an employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”), which purchased 112,080 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $10 per share.

In accordance with Federal conversion regulations, at the time of the Conversion from a mutual holding company to a stock holding company, the Company was required to substantially restrict retained earnings by establishing a liquidation account and the Bank established a parallel liquidation account. The liquidation account will be maintained for the benefit of eligible holders who continue to maintain their accounts at the Bank after conversion. The liquidation account will be reduced annually to the extent that eligible account holders have reduced their qualifying deposits. Subsequent increases will not restore an eligible account holder’s interest in the liquidation account. In the event of a complete liquidation of the Bank, and only in such event, each account holder will be entitled to receive a distribution for the liquidation account in an amount proportionate to the adjusted qualifying account balances then held. The Bank may not pay dividends if those dividends would reduce equity capital below the required liquidation account amount.

F-8

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

The Conversion was accounted for as a change in corporate form with the historical basis of the MHC’s consolidated assets, liabilities and equity unchanged as a result.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, West End Bank, S.B. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses and fair values of financial instruments.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, cash equivalents consisted primarily of interest bearing demand deposits.

The Bank is required to maintain reserve funds in cash and/or deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank as of December 31, 2016 of $22,000.

At December 31, 2016, the Company’s interest-bearing cash accounts exceeded federally insured limits by approximately $4,663,000. This amount included $2,541,000 held at the Federal Home Loan Bank and $1,628,000 held at the Federal Reserve Bank, which are not federally insured.

Investment Securities

All of the Bank’s investment securities are classified as “available for sale” and recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income. Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the terms of the securities, with the exception of mortgage-backed securities, which are amortized over an estimated average life. Gains and losses on the sale of securities are recorded on the trade date and are determined using the specific identification method.

For debt securities with fair value below carrying value when the Company does not intend to sell a debt security, and it is more likely than not the Company will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis, it recognizes the credit component of an other-than-temporary impairment of a debt security in earnings and the remaining portion in other comprehensive income. For held-to-maturity debt securities, the amount of an other-than-temporary impairment recorded in other comprehensive income for the noncredit portion of a previous other-than-temporary impairment is amortized prospectively over the remaining life of the security on the basis of the timing of future estimated cash flows of the security.

F-9

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

Loans

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoffs are reported at their outstanding principal balances adjusted for unearned income, charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses, any unamortized deferred fees or costs on originated loans and unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans.

For loans amortized at cost, interest income is accrued based on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, as well as premiums and discounts, are deferred and amortized as a level yield adjustment over the respective term of the loan.

For all loan classes, the accrual of interest is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days past due unless the credit is well-secured and in process of collection. Past due status is based on contractual terms of the loan. For all loan classes, the entire balance of the loan is considered past due if the minimum payment contractually required to be paid is not received by the contractual due date. For all loan classes, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.

Consistent with regulatory guidance, charge-offs on all loan segments are taken when specific loans, or portions thereof, are considered uncollectible. The Company’s policy is to promptly charge these loans off in the period the uncollectible loss is reasonably determined.

For all loan portfolio segments except residential and consumer loans, the Company promptly charges-off loans, or portions thereof, when available information confirms that specific loans are uncollectible based on information that includes, but is not limited to, (1) the deteriorating financial condition of the borrower, (2) declining collateral values, and/or (3) legal action, including bankruptcy, that impairs the borrower’s ability to adequately meet its obligations. For impaired loans that are considered to be solely collateral dependent, a partial charge-off is recorded when a loss has been confirmed by an updated appraisal or other appropriate valuation of the collateral.

The Company charges-off residential and consumer loans, or portions thereof, when the Company reasonably determines the amount of the loss. The Company adheres to timeframes established by applicable regulatory guidance which provides for the charge-down of 1-4 family first and junior lien mortgages to the net realizable value less costs to sell when the loan is 180 days past due, charge-off of unsecured open-end loans when the loan is 180 days past due, and charge down to the net realizable value when other secured loans are 120 days past due. Loans at these respective delinquency thresholds for which the Company can clearly document that the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection, such that collection will occur regardless of delinquency status, need not be charged off.

For all classes, all interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on nonaccrual or charged off are reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. Nonaccrual loans are returned to accrual status when, in the opinion of management, the financial position of the borrower indicates there is no longer any reasonable doubt as to the timely collection of interest or principal. The Company requires a period of satisfactory performance of not less than six months before returning a nonaccrual loan to accrual status.

F-10

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

When cash payments are received on impaired loans in each loan class, the Company records the payment as interest income unless collection of the remaining recorded principal amount is doubtful, at which time payments are used to reduce the principal balance of the loan. Troubled debt restructured loans recognize interest income on an accrual basis at the renegotiated rate if the loan is in compliance with the modified terms.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to income. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

The allowance consists of allocated and general components. The allocated component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. For those loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non-impaired loans and is based on historical charge-off experience by segment. The historical loss experience is determined by portfolio segment and is based on the actual loss history experienced by the Company over the prior three years. Management believes the three year historical loss experience methodology is appropriate in the current economic environment. Other adjustments (qualitative/environmental considerations) for each segment may be added to the allowance for each loan segment after an assessment of internal or external influences on credit quality that are not fully reflected in the historical loss or risk rating data.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due based on the loan’s current payment status and the borrower’s financial condition including available sources of cash flows. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for non-homogenous type loans such as commercial, non-owner residential and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. For impaired loans where the Company utilizes the discounted cash flows to determine the level of impairment, the Company includes the entire change in the present value of cash flows as bad debt expense.

F-11

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

The fair values of collateral dependent impaired loans are based on independent appraisals of the collateral. In general, the Company acquires an updated appraisal upon identification of impairment and annually thereafter for commercial, commercial real estate and multi-family loans. If the most recent appraisal is over a year old, and a new appraisal is not performed, due to lack of comparable values or other reasons, the existing appraisal is utilized and discounted 20% - 30% based on the age of the appraisal, condition of the subject property, and overall economic conditions. After determining the collateral value as described, the fair value is calculated based on the determined collateral value less selling expenses. The potential for outdated appraisal values is considered in our determination of the allowance for loan losses through our analysis of various trends and conditions including the local economy, trends in charge-offs and delinquencies, etc. and the related qualitative adjustments assigned by the Company.

Segments of loans with similar risk characteristics are collectively evaluated for impairment based on the segment’s historical loss experience adjusted for changes in trends, conditions and other relevant factors that affect repayment of the loans. Accordingly, the Company does not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment measurements, unless such loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement due to financial difficulties of the borrower.

Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment are carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method for premises and the declining balance method for equipment based principally on the estimated useful lives of the assets. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred while major additions and improvements are capitalized. Gains and losses on dispositions are included in current operations.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

Federal Home Loan Bank stock is a required investment for institutions that are members of the Federal Home Loan Bank system. The required investment in the common stock is based on a predetermined formula.

Foreclosed Assets Held for Sale

Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value less cost to sell at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Revenue and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in net income or expense from foreclosed assets.

Mortgage-Servicing Rights

Mortgage-servicing assets are recognized separately when rights are acquired through purchase or through sale of financial assets. Under the servicing assets and liabilities accounting guidance (ASC 860-50), servicing rights resulting from the sale or securitization of loans originated by the Company are initially measured at fair value at the date of transfer. The Company has elected to initially and subsequently measure the mortgage-servicing rights for consumer mortgage loans using the fair value method. Under the fair value method, the servicing rights are carried in the balance sheet at fair value and the changes in fair value are reported in earnings in the period in which the changes occur.

F-12

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

Fair value is based on market prices for comparable mortgage-servicing contracts, when available, or alternatively, is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The valuation model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, such as the cost to service, the discount rate, the custodial earnings rate, an inflation rate, ancillary income, prepayment speeds and default rates and losses. These variables change from quarter to quarter as market conditions and projected interest rates change, and may have an adverse impact on the value of the mortgage-servicing right and may result in a reduction to noninterest income.

Servicing fee income is recorded for fees earned for servicing loans. The fees are based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal or a fixed amount per loan and are recorded as income when earned. The fair value change of mortgage-servicing rights is netted against loan servicing fee income.

Income Tax

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with income tax accounting guidance (ASC 740, Income Taxes). The income tax accounting guidance results in two components of income tax expense: current and deferred. Current income tax expense reflects taxes to be paid or refunded for the current period by applying the provisions of the enacted tax law to the taxable income or excess of deductions over revenues. The Company determines deferred income taxes using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and enacted changes in tax rates and laws are recognized in the period in which they occur. Deferred income tax expense results from changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities between periods. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of evidence available, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.

Uncertain tax positions are recognized if it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the tax position will be realized or sustained upon examination. The term more likely than not means a likelihood of more than 50 percent; the terms examined and upon examination also include resolution of the related appeals or litigation processes, if any. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. The determination of whether or not a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold considers the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date and is subject to management’s judgment.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties on income taxes as a component of income tax expense.

The Company files consolidated income tax returns with its subsidiaries.

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income, net of applicable income taxes. Other comprehensive income and accumulated other comprehensive income consist entirely of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on available-for-sale securities.

F-13

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share represents income available to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share reflects additional potential common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance.

Unearned ESOP shares, which are not vested, are excluded from the computation of average shares outstanding.

Note 2: Securities

The amortized cost and approximate fair values of securities are as follows:

	2016
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Approximate Fair Value
Available for sale
Municipal bonds	$	2,021	$	-	$	(167	)	$	1,854
Mortgage-backed securities - GSE residential		22,278		20		(424	)		21,874

Total available for sale	$	24,299	$	20	$	(591	)	$	23,728

	2015
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Approximate Fair Value
Available for sale
Municipal bonds	$	9,168	$	60	$	(57	)	$	9,171
Mortgage-backed securities - GSE residential		19,194		12		(276	)		18,930

Total available for sale	$	28,362	$	72	$	(333	)	$	28,101

The amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale at December 31, 2016, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	December 31, 2016
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value

After ten years		2,021		1,854
Mortgage-backed securities - GSE residential		22,278		21,874

Totals	$	24,299	$	23,728

F-14

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

Securities pledged at December 31, 2016 and 2015 totaled $911,000 and $1,162,000.

Activities related to the sales of securities available for sale for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 are summarized as follows:

	2016		2015
Proceeds from sales of available-for sale securities	$	10,276	$	9,070

Gross gains on sales		143		100

Gross losses on sales		8		62

Certain investments in debt securities are reported in the consolidated financial statements at an amount less than their historical cost. Total fair value of these investments at December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $20,024,000 and $21,008,000 which is approximately 84% and 75% of the Company’s available-for-sale investment portfolio. These declines primarily resulted from changes in market interest rates.

Based on evaluation of available evidence, including recent changes in market interest rates, credit rating information and information obtained from regulatory filings, management believes the declines in fair value for these securities are temporary.

Should the impairment of any of these securities become other than temporary, the cost basis of the investment will be reduced and the resulting loss recognized in net income in the period the other-than-temporary impairment is identified.

Securities with unrealized losses at December 31, 2016 were as follows:

	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
Available-for-sale securities
Municipal bonds	$	1,854	$	(167	)	$	-	$	-		$	1,854	$	(167	)
Mortgage-backed securities - GSE residential		13,249		(292	)		4,921		(132	)		18,170		(424	)
	$	15,103	$	(459	)	$	4,921	$	(132	)	$	20,024	$	(591	)

Securities with unrealized losses at December 31, 2015 were as follows:

	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
Available-for-sale securities
Municipal bonds	$	3,239	$	(44	)	$	908	$	(13	)	$	4,147	$	(57	)
Mortgage-backed securities - GSE residential		8,498		(67	)		8,363		(209	)		16,861		(276	)
	$	11,737	$	(111	)	$	9,271	$	(222	)	$	21,008	$	(333	)

F-15

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

Municipal Bonds

The unrealized losses on the Company’s investments in municipal bonds were caused by interest rate increases. The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost bases of the investments. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2016.

Mortgage-backed Securities – GSE Residential

The unrealized losses on the Company’s investment in mortgage-backed securities were caused by interest rate increases. The Company expects to recover the amortized cost basis over the term of the securities. Because the decline in market value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not, more likely than not, the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2016.

Note 3: Loans and Allowance

Categories of loans include:

	December 31,
	2016		2015

Commercial	$	12,155	$	14,076
Real estate loans
Residential		65,160		60,968
Commercial and multi-family		50,070		47,721
Construction		6,906		3,475
Second mortgages and equity lines of credit		5,716		5,521
Consumer loans
Indirect		79,214		73,166
Other		15,821		15,390
		235,042		220,317
Less
Net deferred loan fees, premiums and discounts		116		115
Allowance for loan losses		2,277		2,193

Total loans	$	232,649	$	218,009

F-16

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

The risk characteristics of each loan portfolio segment are as follows:

Commercial

Commercial loans are primarily based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not be as expected and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most commercial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets such as accounts receivable or inventory and may incorporate a personal guarantee; however, some short-term loans may be made on an unsecured basis. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers.

Commercial and multi-family real estate

These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate. Commercial and multi-family real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of these loans is generally dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan.

Commercial and multi-family real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy. The properties securing the Company’s commercial and multi-family real estate portfolio are diverse in terms of type and geographic location. Management monitors and evaluates commercial real estate loans based on collateral, geography and risk grade criteria. In addition, management tracks the level of owner-occupied commercial real estate loans versus non-owner occupied loans.

Construction

Construction loans are underwritten utilizing feasibility studies, independent appraisal reviews and financial analysis of the developers and property owners. Construction loans are generally based on estimates of costs and value associated with the complete project. These estimates may be inaccurate. Construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment substantially dependent on the success of the ultimate project. Sources of repayment for these types of loans may be pre-committed permanent loans from approved long-term lenders, sales of developed property or an interim loan commitment from the Company until permanent financing is obtained. These loans are closely monitored by on-site inspections and are considered to have higher risks than other real estate loans due to their ultimate repayment being sensitive to interest rate changes, governmental regulation of real property, general economic conditions and the availability of long-term financing.

Residential, Second mortgages and equity lines of credit and Consumer

With respect to residential loans that are secured by 1-4 family residences, the Company generally establishes a maximum loan-to-value ratio and requires private mortgage insurance if that ratio is exceeded. Second mortgages and equity lines of credit loans are typically secured by a subordinate interest in 1-4 family residences, and consumer loans are secured by consumer assets such as automobiles or recreational vehicles. Some consumer loans are unsecured such as small installment loans. Repayment of these loans is primarily dependent on the personal income of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas such as unemployment levels. Risk is mitigated by the fact that the loans are of smaller individual amounts and spread over a large number of borrowers.

F-17

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

The following presents by portfolio class, the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:

				December 31, 2016
				Real Estate
	Commercial			Residential			Commercial and Multi-Family			Construction			Seconds and Equity Line			Consumer			Total

Allowance for loan losses:
Balance, beginning of year	$	44		$	390		$	749		$	3		$	11		$	996		$	2,193
Provision for losses		257			90			274			(3	)		(11	)		1,254			1,861
Recoveries on loans		—			8			—			—			—			114			122
Loans charged off		(54	)		(159	)		(353	)		—			—			(1,333	)		(1,899	)
Balance, end of year	$	247		$	329		$	670		$	-		$	-		$	1,031		$	2,277

				December 31, 2015
				Real Estate
	Commercial			Residential			Commercial and Multi-Family			Construction		Seconds and Equity Line			Consumer			Total

Allowance for loan losses:
Balance, beginning of year	$	29		$	447		$	694		$	2	$	14		$	758		$	1,944
Provision for losses		90			107			262			1		(3	)		1,050			1,507
Recoveries on loans		—			56			4			—		—			89			149
Loans charged off		(75	)		(220	)		(211	)		—		—			(901	)		(1,407	)
Balance, end of year	$	44		$	390		$	749		$	3	$	11		$	996		$	2,193

The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans based on portfolio class and impairment method as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

			December 31, 2016
			Real Estate
	Commercial		Residential		Commercial and Multi-Family		Construction		Seconds and Equity Line		Consumer		Total

Allowance:
Balance, end of year	$	247	$	329	$	670	$	-	$	-	$	1,031	$	2,277
Individually evaluated for impairment		225		-		55		-		-		-		280
Collectivity evaluated for impairment		22		329		615		-		-		1,031		1,997
Loans:
Ending balance	$	12,155	$	65,160	$	50,070	$	6,906	$	5,716	$	95,035	$	235,042
Individually evaluated for impairment		3,624		-		1,653		-		-		-		5,277
Collectivity evaluated for impairment		8,531		65,160		48,417		6,906		5,716		95,035		229,765

F-18

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

			December 31, 2015
			Real Estate
	Commercial		Residential		Commercial and Multi-Family		Construction		Seconds and Equity Line		Consumer		Total

Allowance:
Balance, end of year	$	44	$	390	$	749	$	3	$	11	$	996	$	2,193
Individually evaluated for impairment		-		-		357		-		-		-		357
Collectivity evaluated for impairment		44		390		392		3		11		996		1,836
Loans:
Ending balance		14,076		60,968		47,721		3,475		5,521		88,556		220,317
Individually evaluated for impairment		-		-		2,337		-		-		-		2,337
Collectivity evaluated for impairment		14,076		60,968		45,384		3,475		5,521		88,556		217,980

The following tables present the credit risk profile of the Bank’s loan portfolio based on rating category and payment activity as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

			December 31, 2016
			Real Estate
	Commercial		Residential		Commercial and Multi-Family		Construction		Seconds and Equity Line		Consumer		Total

Pass	$	8,531	$	65,160	$	45,618	$	6,906	$	5,716	$	95,035	$	226,966
Watch		––		––		––		—		—		—		––
Special Mention		––		––		2,799		—		––		—		2,799
Substandard		3,624		––		1,653		—		—		––		5,277
Doubtful		––		—		—		—		—		—		––
Loss		—		—		—		—		––		—		––

Total	$	12,155	$	65,160	$	50,070	$	6,906	$	5,716	$	95,035	$	235,042

			December 31, 2015
			Real Estate
	Commercial		Residential		Commercial and Multi-Family		Construction		Seconds and Equity Line		Consumer		Total

Pass	$	14,001	$	60,968	$	40,342	$	3,475	$	5,521	$	88,556	$	212,863
Watch		75		––		1,305		—		—		—		1,380
Special Mention		––		––		3,115		—		––		—		3,115
Substandard		––		––		2,959		—		—		––		2,959
Doubtful		––		—		—		—		—		—		––
Loss		—		—		—		—		––		—		––

Total	$	14,076	$	60,968	$	47,721	$	3,475	$	5,521	$	88,556	$	220,317

The Company generally categorizes all classes of loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. Generally, smaller dollar consumer loans are excluded from this grading process and are reflected in the Pass category. The delinquency trends of these consumer loans are monitored on homogeneous basis and the related delinquent amounts are reflected in the aging analysis table below. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

F-19

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

The Pass asset quality rating encompasses assets that have generally performed as expected. With the exception of some smaller consumer and residential loans, these assets generally do not have delinquency. Loans assigned this rating include loans to borrowers possessing solid credit quality with acceptable risk. Borrowers in these grades are differentiated from higher grades on the basis of size (capital and/or revenue), leverage, asset quality, stability of the industry or specific market area and quality/coverage of collateral. These borrowers generally have a history of consistent earnings and reasonable leverage.

The Watch asset quality rating encompasses assets that have been brought to the attention of management and may, if not corrected, warrant a more serious quality rating by management. These assets are usually in the first phase of a deficiency situation and may possess similar criteria as Special Mention assets. This grade includes “pass grade” loans to borrowers which require special monitoring because of deteriorating financial results, declining credit ratings, decreasing cash flow, increasing leverage, marginal collateral coverage or industry stress that has resulted or may result in a changing overall risk profile.

The Special Mention asset quality rating encompasses assets that have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the institution’s credit position at some future date. Special mention assets are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification. This grade is intended to include loans to borrowers whose credit quality has clearly deteriorated and where risk of further decline is possible unless active measures are taken to correct the situation. Weaknesses are considered potential at this state and are not yet fully defined.

The Substandard asset quality rating encompasses assets that are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any; assets having a well-defined weakness(es) based upon objective evidence; assets characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected; or the possibility that liquidation will not be timely. Loans categorized in this grade possess a well-defined credit weakness and the likelihood of repayment from the primary source is uncertain. Significant financial deterioration has occurred and very close attention is warranted to ensure the full repayment without loss. Collateral coverage may be marginal and the accrual of interest has been suspended.

The Doubtful asset quality rating encompasses assets that have all of the weaknesses of those classified as Substandard. In addition, these weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable.

The Loss asset quality rating encompasses assets that are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as assets of the bank is not warranted. A loss classification does not mean that an asset has no recovery or salvage value; instead, it means that it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off or reserving all or a portion of a basically worthless asset, even though partial recovery may be realized in the future.

The Company evaluates the loan grading system definitions and allowance for loan loss methodology on an ongoing basis. No significant changes were made to either during the past year.

F-20

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

The following table presents the Bank’s loan portfolio aging analysis as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

			December 31, 2016
			Real Estate
	Commercial		Residential		Commercial and Multi-Family		Construction		Seconds and Equity Line		Consumer		Total


30-59 days past due	$	7	$	322	$	-	$	-	$	8	$	1,111	$	1,448
60-89 days past due		-		93		-		-		10		396		499
Greater than 90 days and accruing		-		289		257		-		18		728		1,292
Total past due		7		704		257		-		36		2,235		3,239
Current		12,148		64,456		49,813		6,906		5,680		92,800		231,803
Total loans	$	12,155	$	65,160	$	50,070	$	6,906	$	5,716	$	95,035	$	235,042

Nonaccrual loans	$	-	$	230	$	257	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	487
Past due 90 days and accruing		-		71		-		-		18		728		817
Total	$	-	$	301	$	257	$	-	$	18	$	728	$	1,304

			December 31, 2015
			Real Estate
	Commercial		Residential		Commercial and Multi-Family		Construction		Seconds and Equity Line		Consumer		Total


30-59 days past due	$	19	$	55	$	-	$	-	$	8	$	918	$	1,000
60-89 days past due		14		43		-		-		7		219		283
Greater than 90 days and accruing		-		386		122		-		80		899		1,487
Total past due		33		484		122		-		95		2,036		2,770
Current		14,043		60,484		47,599		3,475		5,426		86,520		217,547
Total loans	$	14,076	$	60,968	$	47,721	$	3,475	$	5,521	$	88,556	$	220,317

Nonaccrual loans	$	-	$	564	$	2,337	$	-	$	30	$	-	$	2,931
Past due 90 days and accruing		-		149		-		-		50		899		1,098
Total	$	-	$	713	$	2,337	$	-	$	80	$	899	$	4,029

A loan is considered impaired, in accordance with the impairment accounting guidance (ASC 310-10-35-16), when based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due from the borrower in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans include nonperforming commercial loans but also include loans modified in troubled debt restructurings where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection.

F-21

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

The following table presents impaired loans and specific valuation allowance based on class level at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

			December 31, 2016
			Real Estate
	Commercial		Residential		Commercial and Multi-Family		Construction		Seconds and Equity Line		Consumer		Total


Impaired loans without a specific allowance:
Recorded investment	$	114	$	-	$	731	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	845
Unpaid principal balance		114		-		731		-		-		-		845
Impaired loans with a specific allowance:
Recorded investment		3,510		-		922		-		-		-		4,432
Unpaid principal balance		3,510		-		922		-		-		-		4,432
Specific allowance		225		-		55		-		-		-		280
Total impaired loans:
Recorded investment		3,624		-		1,653		-		-		-		5,277
Unpaid principal balance		3,624		-		1,653		-		-		-		5,277
Specific allowance		225		-		55		-		-		-		280

			December 31, 2015
			Real Estate
	Commercial		Residential		Commercial and Multi-Family		Construction		Seconds and Equity Line		Consumer		Total

Impaired loans without a specific allowance:
Recorded investment	$	-	$	-	$	122	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	122
Unpaid principal balance		-		-		151		-		-		-		151
Impaired loans with a specific allowance:
Recorded investment		-		-		2,214		-		-		-		2,214
Unpaid principal balance		-		-		2,275		-		-		-		2,275
Specific allowance		-		-		357		-		-		-		357
Total impaired loans:
Recorded investment		-		-		2,337		-		-		-		2,337
Unpaid principal balance		-		-		2,426		-		-		-		2,426
Specific allowance		-		-		357		-		-		-		357

The following presents by portfolio segment, information related to the average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans for years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:

December 31, 2016

Real Estate

Commercial

Residential

Commercial
and
Multi-Family

Construction

Seconds
and
Equity Line

Consumer

Total

Total impaired loan:

Average recorded investment

725

––

2,170

––

2,895

Interest income recognized

––

Interest income recognized on a cash basis

––

F-22

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

December 31, 2015

Real Estate

Commercial

Residential

Commercial
and
Multi-Family

Construction

Seconds
and
Equity Line

Consumer

Total

Total impaired loan:

Average recorded investment

––

2,939

––

2,939

Interest income recognized

––

Interest income recognized on a cash basis

––

Troubled Debt Restructurings

In the course of working with borrowers, the Company may choose to restructure the contractual terms of certain loans. In restructuring the loan, the Company attempts to work out an alternative payment schedule with the borrower in order to optimize collectability of the loan. Any loans that are modified, whether through a new agreement replacing the old or via changes to an existing loan agreement, are reviewed by the Company to identify if a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) has occurred. A troubled debt restructuring occurs when, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, the Company grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. Terms may be modified to fit the ability of the borrower to repay in line with its current financial status, and the restructuring of the loan may include the transfer of assets from the borrower to satisfy the debt, a modification of loan terms, or a combination of the two. If such efforts by the Company do not result in a satisfactory arrangement, the loan is referred to legal counsel, at which time foreclosure proceedings are initiated. At any time prior to a sale of the property at foreclosure, the Company may terminate foreclosure proceedings if the borrower is able to work out a satisfactory payment plan.

Nonaccrual loans, including TDRs that have not met the six month minimum performance criterion, are reported in this report as non-performing loans. For all loan classes, it is the Company’s policy to have any restructured loans which are on nonaccrual status prior to being restructured remain on nonaccrual status until six months of satisfactory borrower performance, at which time management would consider its return to accrual status. A loan is generally classified as nonaccrual when the Company believes that receipt of principal and interest is questionable under the terms of the loan agreement. Most generally, this is at 90 or more days past due. If the restructured loan is on accrual status prior to being restructured, it is reviewed to determine if the restructured loan should remain on accrual status. Loans that are considered TDR are classified as performing, unless they are on nonaccrual status or greater than 90 days past due, as of the end of the most recent quarter.

With regard to determination of the amount of the allowance for credit losses, all accruing restructured loans are considered to be impaired. As a result, the determination of the amount of impaired loans for each portfolio segment within troubled debt restructurings is the same as detailed previously above.

There were no new troubled debt restructurings during 2015 and 2016.

F-23

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the balance of real estate owned included $103,000 and $109,000, respectively, of foreclosed residential real estate properties recorded as a result of obtaining physical possession of the property.

At December 31, 2016 and 2015, there were $293,000 and $618,000, respectively, of residential real estate loans in process of foreclosure.

Note 4:

Premises and Equipment

Major classifications of premises and equipment, stated at cost, are as follows:

	December 31,
	2016			2015

Land	$	1,053		$	1,053
Buildings and improvements		3,375			3,671
Furniture and equipment		1,232			1,180
Construction in progress		2,791			-
Software		326			344
Total cost		8,777			6,248
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(2,665	)		(2,665	)
Net	$	6,112		$	3,583

Note 5:

Loan Servicing

Loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The risks inherent in mortgage-servicing assets relate primarily to changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. The unpaid principal balances of mortgage and other loans serviced for others were $69,605,000 and $67,652,000 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The following summarizes the activity in mortgage servicing measured using the fair value method for the periods ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:

	2016			2015

Fair value at the beginning of the period	$	646		$	549
Servicing rights recorded on sale of loans		95			143
Change in fair value due to payments		(78	)		(84	)
Other changes in valuation inputs or assumptions		56			38
Fair value at the end of the period	$	719		$	646

The fair value is estimated using a valuation model that calculates the present value of the future net servicing cash flows, taking into consideration actual and expected mortgage loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs and other economic factors, which are determined based on current market conditions. The valuation model uses a discounted cash flow methodology.

F-24

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

The following summarizes the key economic assumptions used in determining the fair value of the mortgage-servicing rights at December 31, 2016 and 2015:

	December 31,
	2016			2015


Weighted-average constant prepayment rate		10.3	%		11.7	%
Weighted-average discount rate		5.9	%		5.8	%
Weighted expected loan servicing (years)		4.13			3.82

Note 6:

Deposits

	December 31
	2016		2015

Noninterest-bearing	$	22,154	$	19,358
Checking		33,921		30,554
Money market		38,695		38,533
Savings		21,649		18,271
Certificates and other time deposits of $100,000 or more		66,826		67,452
Other certificates and time deposits		41,653		41,110
Total deposits	$	224,898	$	215,278

December 31, 2016, the scheduled maturities of time deposits are as follows:

	2016

2017	$	59,291
2018		21,978
2019		17,018
2020		6,678
2021		3,514
	$	108,479

Certificates and other time deposits of $250,000 or more totaled $19,732,000 and $23,662,000 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015 respectively.

F-25

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

Note 7:

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances

Federal Home Loan Bank advances totaled $32,000,000 and $27,000,000 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Federal Home Loan Bank advances are secured by mortgage loans totaling $64,333,000 at December 31, 2016. Advances, at interest rates from 0.90% to 1.91% are subject to restrictions or penalties in the event of prepayment.

Maturities of Federal Home Loan Bank advances were as follows at December 31, 2016:

	2016
2017	$	9,000
2018		7,000
2019		5,000
2020		7,000
2021		4,000
	$	32,000

Note 8:

Income Taxes

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in Indiana. With a few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal or state examinations by tax authorities for years before 2013.

	2016			2015

Income tax expense
Currently payable
Federal	$	687		$	788
State		180			234
Deferred
Federal		75			(16	)
State		8			(15	)

Total income tax expense	$	950		$	991

Reconciliation of federal statutory to actual tax expense
Federal statutory income tax at 34%		951			963
Effect of state income taxes		124			145
Tax-exempt interest		(46	)		(98	)
Cash surrender value of life insurance		(56	)		(43	)
Other		(23	)		24

Actual tax expense	$	950		$	991
Effective tax rate		34.0	%		35.0	%

F-26

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

A cumulative net deferred tax asset is included in other assets. The components of the asset are as follows:

	2016			2015

Assets
Allowance for loan losses	$	329		$	389
Accrued compensation		273			224
Charitable contributions		51			111
Other real estate owned		40			3
Securities available for sale		226			104
Total assets		919			831

Liabilities
State income tax		(42	)		(42	)
Depreciation		(48	)		(24	)
FHLB stock		(20	)		(20	)
Mortgage-servicing rights		(283	)		(259	)
Other		(1	)		––
Total liabilities		(394	)		(345	)
Net deferred tax asset before valuation allowance		525			486

Valuation allowance
Beginning balance		(60	)		(60	)
(Increase) decrease during the period		––			––
Ending balance		(60	)		(60	)
Net deferred tax assets	$	465		$	426

The Company’s charitable contribution carryover is $147,000. The charitable contribution carryover period for the Company is five years. The contribution carryover began to expire in 2013 with a significant portion of the carryover not expiring until 2017. Due to the limited carryover period, a valuation allowance was established during 2012 for the deferred tax asset the Company estimates it will be unable to utilize.

Retained earnings at December 31, 2016 and 2015 include approximately $3,136,000 for which no deferred income tax liability has been recognized. This amount represents an allocation of income to bad debt deductions as of December 31, 1987 for tax purposes only. Reduction of amounts so allocated for purposes other than tax bad debt losses or adjustments arising from carryback of net operating losses would create income for tax purposes only, which income would be subject to the then-current corporate income tax rate. The unrecorded deferred income tax liability on the above amount was approximately $1,066,000.

The tax expense applicable to realized securities gains for years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $54,000 and $15,000, respectively.

F-27

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

Note 9:

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

In the normal course of business, there are outstanding commitments and contingent liabilities, such as commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit, which are not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual or notional amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making such commitments as it does for instruments that are included in the consolidated balance sheet.

Financial instruments whose contract amount represents credit risk as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

	December 31,
	2016		2015

Commitments to extend credit	$	13,837	$	18,001
Standby letters of credit		461		508

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer's credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property and equipment and income-producing commercial properties.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.

The Company and its subsidiaries are parties to various claims and proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Management, after consultation with legal counsel, believes that the liabilities, if any, arising from such proceedings and claims will not be material to the consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Note 10:

Regulatory Capital

The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under U.S. GAAP, regulatory reporting requirements and regulatory capital standards. The Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

F-28

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

Quantitative measures established by regulatory capital standards to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier I capital (as defined) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), common equity Tier 1 capital (as defined) to total risk-weighted assets (as defined) and of Tier I capital to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, that the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

As of December 31, 2016, the most recent notification from the Department of Financial Institutions, State of Indiana, categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based capital, Tier I risk-based capital, common equity Tier I risk-based capital and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category.

The Bank’s actual and required capital amounts and ratios are as follows:

	Actual					Minimum Capital Requirement					Minimum to Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
2016
Total capital ¹ (to risk-weighted assets)	$	29,695		13.2	%	$	18,032		8.0	%	$	22,540		10.0	%
Tier I capital ¹ (to risk-weighted assets)		27,418		12.2	%		13,524		6.0	%		18,032		8.0	%
Common Equity Tier I capital ¹ (to risk-weighted assets)		27,418		12.2	%		10,143		4.5	%		14,651		6.5	%
Tier I capital ¹ (to average assets)		27,418		9.6	%		11,450		4.0	%		14,312		5.0	%

2015
Total capital ¹ (to risk-weighted assets)	$	29,159		13.7	%	$	16,980		8.0	%	$	21,226		10.0	%
Tier I capital ¹ (to risk-weighted assets)		26,966		12.7	%		12,735		6.0	%		16,980		8.0	%
Common Equity Tier I capital ¹ (to risk-weighted assets)		26,966		12.7	%		9,551		4.5	%		13,797		6.5	%
Tier I capital ¹ (to average assets)		26,966		10.0	%		10,784		4.0	%		13,480		5.0	%
¹ As defined by regulatory agencies

Basel III Capital Rules

In July 2013, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”) approved final rules that substantially amended the regulatory risk-based capital rules applicable to the Bank. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency subsequently approved these final rules. The final rules implement the “Basel III” regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act. “Basel III” refers to two consultative documents released by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in December 2009, the rules text released in December 2010, and loss absorbency rules issued in January 2011, which include significant changes to bank capital, leverage and liquidity requirements.

F-29

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

The final rules include new risk-based capital and leverage ratios, which will be phased in from 2015 to 2019, and will refine the definition of what constitutes “capital” for purposes of calculating those ratios. In general, bank holding companies and savings and loan holding companies with less than $1 billion in total consolidated assets will not be subject to the new regulatory capital requirements described above (but these requirements will apply to their depository institution subsidiaries), due to action taken by the U.S. Congress in December 2014 and action taken by the Federal Reserve in 2015 to implement the Congressional action.

The new minimum capital level requirements applicable to the Bank under the final rules are: (i) a new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6% (increased from 4%); (iii) a total capital ratio of 8% (unchanged from current rules); and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4% for all institutions. The final rules also establish a “capital conservation buffer” above the new regulatory minimum capital requirements, which must consist entirely of common equity Tier 1 capital. The capital conservation buffer will be phased-in over four years beginning on January 1, 2016, as follows: the maximum buffer will be 0.625% of risk-weighted assets for 2016, 1.25% for 2017, 1.875% for 2018, and 2.5% for 2019 and thereafter. This will result in the following minimum ratios beginning in 2019: (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 7.0%, (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%, and (iii) a total capital ratio of 10.5%. Under the final rules, institutions are subject to limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary bonuses if its capital level falls below the buffer amount. These limitations establish a maximum percentage of eligible retained income that could be utilized for such actions.

Basel III provided discretion for regulators to impose an additional buffer, the “countercyclical buffer,” of up to 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to take into account the macro-financial environment and periods of excessive credit growth. However, the final rules permit the countercyclical buffer to be applied only to “advanced approach banks” (i.e., banks with $250 billion or more in total assets or $10 billion or more in total foreign exposures), which currently excludes the Bank. The final rules also implement revisions and clarifications consistent with Basel III regarding the various components of Tier 1 capital, including common equity, unrealized gains and losses, as well as certain instruments that will no longer qualify as Tier 1 capital, some of which would be phased out over time. However, the final rules provide that small depository institution holding companies with less than $15 billion in total assets as of December 31, 2009 (which includes the Corporation) will be able to permanently include non-qualifying instruments that were issued and included in Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital prior to May 19, 2010 in additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital until they redeem such instruments or until the instruments mature.

The final rules also contain revisions to the prompt corrective action framework, which is designed to place restrictions on insured depository institutions, including the Bank, if their capital levels begin to show signs of weakness. These revisions took effect January 1, 2015. Under the prompt corrective action requirements, which are designed to complement the capital conservation buffer, insured depository institutions will be required to meet the following increased capital level requirements in order to qualify as “well capitalized”: (i) a new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8% (increased from 6%); (iii) a total capital ratio of 10% (unchanged from current rules); and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5% (increased from 4%).

F-30

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

Note 11:

Employee Benefits

The Company has a retirement savings 401(k) plan covering substantially all employees. Effective January 1, 2012, the Company elected the Safe Harbor provisions provided by the Internal Revenue Code. Under this plan employees may contribute up to 50% of their compensation in 1% increments with the Company matching 100% of the employee’s contribution on the first 3% and 50% of the next 2% of the employee’s compensation. Employer contributions charged to expense were $95,000 and $87,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

Prior to April 24, 2012, the Company provided pension benefits for substantially all of its employees through its participation in a pension fund known as the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan (Pentegra Plan). The Company chose to freeze the Pentegra Plan effective April 24, 2012. The trustees of the Financial Institutions Retirement Fund administer the Pentegra Plan, employer identification number 13-5645888 and plan number 333. This plan operates as a multi-employer plan for accounting purposes and as a multiple-employer plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the Internal Revenue Code. There are no collective bargaining agreements in place that require contributions to the Pentegra Plan. The Pentegra Plan is a single plan under Internal Revenue Code 413(c) and, as a result, all of the assets stand behind all of the liabilities.

The risks of participating in these multiemployer plans are different from single-employer plans in the following aspects:

Assets contributed to the multiemployer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers.

If a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers.

If the Company chooses to stop participating in the multiemployer plan, the Company may be required to pay the plan an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability.

Pension expense related to this plan was $90,000 and $90,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. Funding status of the plan as of the beginning of the plan years for 2016 and 2015 (July 1^st) was 100.07% and 103.20% respectively.

The Company’s contributions for the years ending December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $92,000 and $83,000, respectively. Total contributions to the Pentegra Plan were $163,138,000 and $190,752,000 for the plan years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company’s contributions to the Pentegra Plan were not more than 5% of the total contributions to the plan. There have been no significant changes that affect the comparability of the 2016 and 2015 contributions.

During 2016, the Company entered into a salary continuation agreement with three executive officers that provides supplemental retirement benefits. The Company recognized expense for these agreements totaling $43,000 during the year ended December 31, 2016.

The Company executed a nonqualified benefit plan covering certain directors on January 1, 2000. The plan features deferred compensation benefits for 120 months following retirement for each director.

F-31

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

During 2004, the Board of Directors approved a proposal to include secular trusts as part of the nonqualified benefit plan. The same costs that would be recognized under a noncontributory plan are now contributed to secular trusts in the name of each director. In addition, the tax impact of the contributions to the individual participants is also being recognized as a cost of the retirement plan. Consequently, the plan was funded at the date of conversion. Retirement plan costs recognized for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $56,000 and $102,000, respectively.

The retirement plan also includes change in control provisions for certain individuals. Under these provisions, the Company may be required to accelerate contributions to the secular grantor trust at the time the change of control occurs.

The Company has also entered into employment or change in control agreements with certain officers that provide for the severance payments and the continuation of certain benefits for a specified period of time under certain conditions. Under the terms of the agreements, these payments could occur in the event of a change in control of the Company, as defined, along with other specific conditions. The severance payments under these agreements are generally three times the annual salary of the officer in the event of a change in control.

Note 12:

Share Based Compensation

In May 2013, the Company’s stockholders approved the West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (“Plan”) which provides for awards of stock options and restricted stock to key officers and outside directors. The cost of the Plan is based on the fair value of the awards on the grant date. The fair value of restricted stock awards is based on the closing price of the Company’s stock on the grant date. The fair value of stock options is estimated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using assumptions for dividend yield, stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate, and option term. These assumptions are based on management’s judgments regarding future events, are subjective in nature, and contain uncertainties inherent in an estimate. The cost of the awards are being recognized on a straight-line basis over the five-year vesting period during which participants are required to provide services in exchange for the awards.

Until such time as awards of stock are granted and vest or options are exercised, shares of the Company’s common stock under the Plan shall be authorized but unissued shares. The maximum number of shares authorized under the plan is 196,140. Total share-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $289,000 and $283,000, respectively.

Stock Options

The table below represents the stock option activity for the period shown:

	Options		Weighted average exercise price		Remaining contractual life (years)
Options outstanding at January 1, 2016		125,550	$	18.77
Granted		11,000		21.50
Exercised		-		-
Forfeited		-		-
Expired		-		-
Options outstanding at December 31, 2016		136,550	$	18.99		6.7
Exercisable options outstanding at December 31, 2016		73,430	$	18.76		6.5

F-32

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

	Options			Weighted average exercise price		Remaining contractual life (years)
Options outstanding at January 1, 2015		125,300		$	18.75
Granted		2,500			20.00
Exercised		(2,250	)		18.75
Forfeited		—			—
Expired		—			—
Options outstanding at December 31, 2015		125,550		$	18.77		7.5
Exercisable options outstanding at December 31, 2015		47,870		$	18.75		7.5

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had $136,000 and $182,000, respectively, of unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options. Exercisable options vested in the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were 25,560 and 25,060 respectively. The cost of stock options will be amortized in monthly installments over the five-year vesting period. Stock option expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $79,000 and $73,000, respectively. The total intrinsic value of the exercisable options at December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $1,119,000 and $211,000 respectively. The total intrinsic value of options as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $2,049,000 and $549,000, respectively. No options were exercised in 2016. The intrinsic value of options exercised in 2015 was $10,000.

The fair value of the Company’s stock options granted in 2016 was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing formula. The following assumptions were used in the formula:

Expected volatility		12.34	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.56	%
Expected dividend yield		1.12	%
Expected life (in years)		7.5
Exercise price for the stock options	$	21.50

Expected volatility - Based on the historical volatility of share price for similar companies.

Risk-free interest rate - Based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve and expected life of the options at the time of grant.

Dividend yield - West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. pays a regular quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share.

Expected life – Based on average of the five year vesting period and the ten year contractual term of the stock option plan.

Exercise price for the stock options - Based on the closing price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant.

Restricted Stock Awards

Restricted stock awards are accounted for as fixed grants using the fair value of the Company’s stock at the time of the grant. Unvested restricted stock awards may not be disposed of or transferred during the vesting period. Restricted stock awards carry with them the right to receive dividends.

F-33

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

The table below presents the restricted stock award activity for the period shown:

	Service-Based Restricted stock awards		Weighted average grant date fair value
Non-vested at January 1, 2016		33,624	$	18.75
Granted		—		—
Vested		11,208	$	18.75
Forfeited		—		—
Non-vested at December 31, 2016		22,416	$	18.75

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had $307,000 and $517,000, respectively of unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock awards. The cost of the restricted stock awards will be amortized in monthly installments over the five-year vesting period. Restricted stock expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $210,000 and $210,000, respectively.

Note 13:

Employee Stock Ownership Plan

As part of the conversion, the Bank established an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) covering substantially all employees. The ESOP acquired 112,080 shares of Company common stock at $10 per share in the conversion with funds provided by a loan from the Company. Accordingly, $1,121,000 of common stock acquired by the ESOP was shown as a reduction of stockholders’ equity. Shares are released to participants proportionately as the loan is repaid. Dividends on allocated shares are recorded as dividends and charged to retained earnings. Dividends on unallocated shares are used to repay the loan and are treated as compensation expense. Compensation expense is recorded equal to the fair market value of the stock when contributions, which are determined annually by the Board of Directors, are made to the ESOP.

ESOP expense for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $136,000 and $121,000.

	December 31,
	2016		2015

Allocated shares		27,187		21,583
Unearned shares		84,060		89,664
Total ESOP shares		111,247		111,247

Fair value of unearned shares at December 31	$	2,858	$	2,075

At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the fair value of the 27,187 and 21,583 allocated shares held by the ESOP was $924,000 and $500,000, respectively, based on the quoted per share price of $34.00 and $23.15 at December 31, 2015 and 2015, respectively.

During 2016, it was determined based on trading volumes and other considerations, the company’s stock was no longer traded on an active market.

F-34

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

In the event the ESOP is unable to satisfy the obligation to repurchase the shares held by each beneficiary upon the beneficiary’s termination or retirement, the Company is obligated to purchase such shares at their fair market value based on the most recent valuation report any time within 60 days of the distribution date. If this right is not exercised, an additional 60-day exercise period is available in the year following the year in which the distribution is made and begins after a new valuation of the stock has been determined and communicated to the participant or beneficiary. At December 31, 2016, the allocated shares held by the ESOP and the outstanding shares held by former employees subject to the repurchase option totaled 28,989. At December 31, 2016, the 28,989 shares had a fair value of $661,000 ($22.80 per share based on the most recent valuation report) and have been classified as mezzanine capital.

Note 14:

Earnings Per Share

The Company has granted stock compensation awards with non-forfeitable dividend rights, which are considered participating securities. Accordingly, earnings per share (EPS) is computed using the two-class method as required by ASC 260-10-45. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income allocated to common stock by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period which excludes the participating securities. Diluted EPS includes the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares from stock compensation awards, but excludes awards considered participating securities. ESOP shares are not considered outstanding for EPS until they are earned. The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted EPS for the periods indicated (in thousands, except for share and per share data):

	December
	2016			2015

Net Income	$	1,847		$	1,841
Allocated to participating securities		(51	)		(61	)
Net income allocated to common stockholders	$	1,796		$	1,780

Weighted average common shares outstanding, gross		1,097,346			1,260,126
Less: Average unearned ESOP shares and participating securities		(114,733	)		(131,545	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding, net		982,613			1,128,581
Effect of diluted based awards		21,380			7,653
Weighted average shares and common stock equivalents		1,003,993			1,136,234

Income per common share:
Basic	$	1.83		$	1.58
Diluted	$	1.79		$	1.57

Options excluded from the calculation due to their anti-dilutive effect on earnings per share		-			2,500

Note 15:

Related Party Transactions

The Bank has entered into transactions with certain directors, executive officers, significant stockholders and their affiliates or associates (related parties). Such transactions were made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms and conditions, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the same time for comparable transactions with other customers, and did not, in the opinion of management, involve more than normal credit risk or present other unfavorable features. The aggregate amount of loans to such related parties at December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $2,016,000 and $1,618,000, respectively.

F-35

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

Annual activity consisted of the following:

	2016			2015

Balance, beginning of year	$	1,618		$	1,759
New loans		197			46
Change in composition		940			-
Repayments		(739	)		(187	)
Balance, end of year	$	2,016		$	1,618

Deposits from related parties held by the Bank at December 31, 2016 and 2015 totaled $567,000 and $393,000 respectively.

Note 16:

Disclosures About Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Topic 820 also specifies a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes six levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

Level 2

Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3

Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities

Recurring Measurements

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

F-36

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

Available-for-Sale Securities

Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the security’s terms and conditions. Additionally, matrix pricing is used for certain investment securities and is a mathematical technique widely used in the banking industry to value investment securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for specific investment securities but rather relying on the investment securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted investment securities. Level 2 securities include SBA loan pools, municipal bonds and mortgage-backed securities. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, all mortgage-backed securities are residential government sponsored enterprises. In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.

Mortgage-Servicing Rights

Mortgage-servicing rights do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow models having significant inputs of actual and expected mortgage loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs and other economic factors, which are determined based on current market conditions. Due to the nature of the valuation inputs, mortgage-servicing rights are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. Significant changes in any of the inputs could significantly impact the fair value measurement.

Fair value determinations for Level 3 measurements are the responsibility of the Finance Department. The Finance Department contracts with a pricing specialist to generate fair value estimates on a quarterly basis. The Finance Department challenges the reasonableness of the assumptions used and reviews the methodology to ensure the estimated fair value complies with accounting standards generally accepted in the United States. Using the data from the quarterly valuation, the Finance Department adjusts to fair value on a monthly basis.

The following tables present the fair value measurements of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at December 31, 2016 and 2015:

			2016
			Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Available-for-sale securities:
Municipal bonds	$	1,854	$	—	$	1,854	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities - GSE residential		21,874		—		21,874		—
Mortgage-servicing rights		719		—		—		719

F-37

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

			2015
			Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Available-for-sale securities:
Municipal bonds	$	9,171	$	—	$	9,171	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities - GSE residential		18,930		—		18,930		—
Mortgage-servicing rights		646		—		—		646

The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of recurring fair value measurements recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs:

	Mortgage-Servicing Rights

	2016			2015

Balances, January 1	$	646		$	549
Total unrealized gains included in net income		56			38
Additions (rights recorded on sale of loans)		95			143
Settlements (payments)		(78	)		(84	)
Balances, December 31	$	719		$	646

Total unrealized gains and losses included in net income reflected in the table above are included in loan servicing income, net.

Nonrecurring Measurements

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Impaired Loans (Collateral Dependent)

Loans, for which it is probable that the Company will not collect all principal and interest due according to contractual terms, are measured for impairment. Allowable methods for determining the amount of impairment include estimating fair value using the fair value of the collateral for collateral-dependent loans.

F-38

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

Impaired loans that are collateral dependent are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy when impairment is determined using the fair value method.

Foreclosed Real Estate Held for Sale

Foreclosed real estate held for sale is carried at the lower of fair value at acquisition date or current estimated fair value, less estimated cost to sell when the real estate is acquired. Estimated fair value of foreclosed real estate is based on appraisals on evaluations. Foreclosed real estate is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Appraisals of foreclosed real estate are obtained when the real estate is acquired and subsequently as deemed necessary by management. Appraisals are reviewed for accuracy and consistency by the management. Appraisers are selected from the list of approved appraisers maintained by management.

The following tables present the fair value measurements of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall:

			2016
			Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Impaired loans	$	4,152	$	—	$	—	$	4,152

Foreclosed real estate held for sale	$	600	$	—	$	—	$	600

			2015
			Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Impaired loans	$	1,857	$	—	$	—	$	1,857

F-39

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

Unobservable (Level 3) Inputs

The following table presents quantitative information about unobservable inputs used in recurring and nonrecurring Level 3 fair value measurements.

	Fair Value at December 31, 2016		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range (Weighted Average)

Impaired loans	$	4,152	Comparative sales based on independent appraisals	Marketability Discount	32.0%

Foreclosed real estate held for sale	$	600	Based on independent appraisals	Marketability Discount	2.0%

Mortgage-servicing rights	$	719	Discounted Cash Flow	Discount rate Conditional prepayment rate Expected loan servicing years	5.3% -6.1% (5.9%) 8.7% - 10.9% (10.3%) 2.4 – 4.5 (4.1)

	Fair Value at December 31, 2015		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range (Weighted Average)


Impaired loans	$	1,857	Comparative sales based on independent appraisals	Marketability Discount	20.0%

Mortgage-servicing rights	$	646	Discounted Cash Flow	Discount rate Conditional prepayment rate Expected loan servicing years	5.1% -6.0% (5.8%) 9.0% - 13.2% (11.7%) 2.6 – 4.2 (3.8)

Sensitivity of Significant Unobservable Inputs

The following is a discussion of the sensitivity of significant unobservable inputs, the interrelationships between those inputs and other unobservable inputs used in recurring fair value measurement and of how those inputs might magnify or mitigate the effect of changes in the unobservable inputs on the fair value measurement.

Mortgage-servicing rights

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s mortgage-servicing rights are discount rates, conditional prepayment rates and expected loan servicing years. Significant increases or decreases in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significant change in the fair value measurement.

The following methods were used to estimate the fair value of all other financial instruments recognized in the accompanying balance sheets at amounts other than fair value.

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Federal Home Loan Bank Stock, Interest Receivable and Interest Payable

The carrying amount approximates fair value.

F-40

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

Loans Held for Sale

Loans held for sale are based on current market prices.

Loans

The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the market rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. Loans with similar characteristics were aggregated for purposes of the calculations. The carrying amount of accrued interest approximates its fair value.

Deposits

Deposits include demand deposits, savings accounts, NOW accounts and certain money market deposits. The carrying amount approximates fair value. The fair value of fixed-maturity time deposits is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances

Rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value of existing debt. Fair value of long-term debt is based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market. If a quoted market price is not available, an expected present value technique is used to estimate fair value.

The following table presents estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at December 31, 2016 and 2015.

	December 31, 2016
			Fair Value
			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying		Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Amount		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7,649	$	7,649	$	––	$	—
Loans held for sale		346		––		346		—
Loans, net		232,649		—		––		234,018
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,329		—		1,329		—
Interest receivable		1,037		—		1,037		—
Financial liabilities
Deposits		224,898		116,419		108,416		—
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		32,000		—		31,923		—
Interest payable		82		—		82		—

F-41

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

	December 31, 2015
			Fair Value
			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying		Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Amount		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	6,837	$	6,837	$	––	$	—
Loans held for sale		1,668		––		1,668		—
Loans, net		218,009		—		––		220,493
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,323		—		1323		—
Interest receivable		1,080		—		1,080		—
Financial liabilities
Deposits		215,278		106,716		109,123		—
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		27,000		—		26,962		—
Interest payable		75		—		75		—

Note 17: Condensed Financial Information (Parent Company Only)

Presented below is condensed financial information as to financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company:

Condensed Balance Sheets

	2016		2015
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	984	$	389
Investment in subsidiary		27,072		26,808
Other assets		146		207

Total assets	$	28,202	$	27,404

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Liabilities		-		-
Redeemable common stock held by ESOP		661		-
Total stockholders' equity less maximum cash obligation related to ESOP shares		27,541		27,404

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	28,202	$	27,404

F-42

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

Condensed Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income

	2016		2015
Income
Dividends from subsidiary	$	1,900	$	2,156
Other income		2		3
Total Income		1,902		2,159

Expenses
Other expenses		308		307

Income Before Income Tax and Equity in Undistributed Income of Subsidiary		1,594		1,852

Income Tax Benefit		112		115

Income Before Equity in Undistributed Income of Subsidiary		1,706		1,967

Distribution in excess of Income of subsidiary		141		(126	)

Net Income	$	1,847	$	1,841

Comprehensive Income	$	1,660	$	1,787

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

	2016			2015
Operating Activities
Net income	$	1,847		$	1,841
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities		(1,843	)		(1,893	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		4			(52	)

Investing Activities
Investment in Bank		(22	)		(22	)
Dividends from subsidiary		1,900			2,156
Net cash provided by investing activities		1,878			2,134

Financing Activities
Dividends paid		(241	)		(273	)
Repurchased shares		(1,046	)		(4,962	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,287	)		(5,235	)

Net Change in Cash and Due From Banks		595			(3,153	)

Cash and Due From Banks at Beginning of Year		389			3,542

Cash and Due From Banks at End of Year	$	984		$	389

F-43

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

Note 18: Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, “Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” which clarifies the guidance in determining revenue recognition as principal versus agent. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, “Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,” which provides guidance in accounting for immaterial performance obligations and shipping and handling. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, “Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients,” which provides clarification on assessing the collectability criterion, presentation of sales taxes, measurement date for noncash consideration and completed contracts at transition. This ASU also provides a practical expedient for contract modifications.

These amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods with that reporting period, as deferred by ASU 2015-14. Early application is permitted as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within the reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting these amendments.

In January 2015, FASB issued ASU, 2015-1, “Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items”. The Board issued this Update as part of its initiative to reduce complexity in accounting standards (the Simplification Initiative). The objective of the Simplification Initiative is to identify, evaluate, and improve areas of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for which cost and complexity can be reduced while maintaining or improving the usefulness of the information provided to the users of financial statements.

This Update eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. Subtopic 225-20, Income Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual Items, required that an entity separately classify, present, and disclose extraordinary events and transactions. Presently, an event or transaction is presumed to be an ordinary and usual activity of the reporting entity unless evidence clearly supports its classification as an extraordinary item. Paragraph 225-20-45-2 contains the following criteria that must both be met for extraordinary classification:

Unusual nature. The underlying event or transaction should possess a high degree of abnormality and be of a type clearly unrelated to, or only incidentally related to, the ordinary and typical activities of the entity, taking into account the environment in which the entity operates.

Infrequency of occurrence. The underlying event or transaction should be of a type that would not reasonably be expected to recur in the foreseeable future, taking into account the environment in which the entity operates.

If an event or transaction meets the criteria for extraordinary classification, an entity is required to segregate the extraordinary item from the results of ordinary operations and show the item separately in the income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations. The entity also is required to disclose applicable income taxes and either present or disclose earnings-per-share data applicable to the extraordinary item.

F-44

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. A reporting entity may apply the amendments prospectively. A reporting entity also may apply the amendments retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The effective date is the same for both public business entities and all other entities.

For an entity that prospectively applies the guidance, the only required transition disclosure will be to disclose, if applicable, both the nature and the amount of an item included in income from continuing operations after adoption that adjusts an extraordinary item previously classified and presented before the date of adoption. An entity retrospectively applying the guidance should provide the disclosures in paragraphs 250-10-50-1 through 50-2. The company adopted the methodologies prescribed by this ASU by the date required. Adoption of the ASU did not a have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. ASU 2016-01, among other things, (i) requires equity investments, with certain exceptions, to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, (ii) simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment, (iii) eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet, (iv) requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, (v) requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments, (vi) requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements and (vii) clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). Under the new guidance, a lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. Consistent with current GAAP, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. However, unlike current GAAP, which requires only capital leases to be recognized on the balance sheet, the new ASU will require both types of leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

F-45

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

In March 2016, as part of its Simplification Initiative, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, (“ASU 2016-09”) which finalizes Proposed ASU No. 2015-270 of the same name, and seeks to reduce complexity in accounting standards. The areas for simplification in ASU No. 2016-09, involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including (1) accounting for income taxes, (2) classification of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flow, (3) forfeitures, (4) minimum statutory tax withholding requirements, (5) classification of employee taxes paid on the statement of cash flows when an employer withholds shares for tax withholding purposes, (6) the practical expedient for estimating the expected term, and (7) intrinsic value. Application is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and for interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326). The ASU is intended to improve financial reporting by requiring timelier recording of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments held by financial institutions and other organizations. The ASU requires the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied today will still be permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. Organizations will continue to use judgment to determine which loss estimation method is appropriate for their circumstances. The ASU requires enhanced disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses, as well as the credit quality and underwriting standards of an organization’s portfolio. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements that provide additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements. In addition, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The ASU is effective for SEC filers for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early application will be permitted for all organizations for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. While the Company expects that the implementation of this ASU will increase the balance of the allowance for loan losses, it is continuing to evaluate the potential impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial position.

In August 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update provide guidance on eight cash flow issues where current Generally Accepted Accounting Principles is either unclear or does not include specific guidance. The eight cash flow issues are as follows:

Debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs

Settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims

Proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies

Distribution received from equity method investees

Beneficial interest in securitization transactions

F-46

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

Separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle

The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. The adoptions of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

F-47

ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None

ITEM 9A Controls and Procedures

(a) An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of December 31, 2016. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2016, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

(b) Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting.

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013).” Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2016, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective, based on those criteria.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

ITEM 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Code of Ethics

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer and all other employees and directors. The Code of Ethics is available on our website at www.westendbank.com.

Information concerning directors and executive officers of West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement, specifically the section captioned “Proposal I – Election of Directors.”

ITEM 11. Executive Compensation

Information concerning executive compensation is incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement, specifically the section captioned “Executive Compensation.”

ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information concerning security ownership of certain owners and management is incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement, specifically the section captioned “Voting Securities and Principal Holder Thereof.”

ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

Information concerning relationships, transactions and director independence is incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement, specifically the section captioned “Transactions with Certain Related Persons” and “Board Independence.”

ITEM 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Information concerning principal accountant fees and services is incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement, specifically the section captioned “Proposal II-Ratification of Appointment of Auditor.”

PART IV

ITEM 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1)

Financial Statements

The documents filed as a part of this Form 10-K are:

(A)

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm;

(B)

Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 2016 and 2015;

(C)

Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015;

(D)

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015;

(E)

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015;

(F)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015; and

(G)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(a)(2)

Financial Statement Schedules

All financial statement schedules have been omitted as the required information is inapplicable or has been included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(a)(3)

Exhibits

3.1

Articles of Incorporation of West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.*

3.2

Bylaws of West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.*

Form of Common Stock Certificate of West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.*

10.1

West End Bank, S.B. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for John McBride*

10.2

Second Amendment to the West End Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan *

10.3

Form of Director Retirement Plan *

10.4

Form of Amendment to the Director Retirement Plan *

10.5

West End Bank, S.B. Employee Stock Ownership Plan *

10.6

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with John P. McBride **

10.7

Form of Employment Agreement with Timothy R. Frame and Shelley D. Miller *

10.8

Description of Cash Bonus Plan *

10.9

2013 Equity Incentive Plan ***

Subsidiaries

Consent of Independent Auditor

31.1

Certification required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Certification required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-175509), initially filed July 12, 2011.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 13, 2013.

***

Incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement filed on April 11, 2013.

ITEM 16. Form 10-K Summary

None.

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.

Date: March 30, 2017	By:	/s/ Timothy R. Frame
		Timothy R. Frame
		President and Chief Executive Officer (Duly Authorized Representative)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signatures	Title	Date

/s/ Timothy R. Frame	President and Chief Executive Officer	March 30, 2017
Timothy R. Frame

/s/ Shelley D. Miller	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	March 30, 2017
Shelley D. Miller	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

/s/ John P. McBride	Chairman of the Board	March 30, 2017
John P. McBride

/s/ Michael J. Allen	Director	March 30, 2017
Michael J. Allen

/s/ Shaun Dingwerth	Director	March 30, 2017
Shaun Dingwerth

/s/ Greg Janzow	Director	March 30, 2017
Greg Janzow

/s/Craig C. Kinyon	Director	March 30, 2017
Craig C. Kinyon

/s/ Jennifer North	Director	March 30, 2017
Jennifer North

Exhibit Index

	3.1	Articles of Incorporation of West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.*
	3.2	Bylaws of West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.*
	4	Form of Common Stock Certificate of West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc.*
	10.1	West End Bank, S.B. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for John McBride*
	10.2	Second Amendment to the West End Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan *
	10.3	Form of Director Retirement Plan *
	10.4	Form of Amendment to the Director Retirement Plan *
	10.5	West End Bank, S.B. Employee Stock Ownership Plan *
	10.6	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with John P. McBride **
	10.7	Form of Employment Agreement with Timothy R. Frame and Shelley D. Miller *
	10.8	Description of Cash Bonus Plan *
	10.9	2013 Equity Inventive Plan ***
	21	Subsidiaries
	23	Consent of Independent Auditor
	31.1	Certification required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	31.2	Certification required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	*	Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-175509), initially filed July 12, 2011.

	**	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 13, 2013.

	***	Incorporated reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement filed on April 11, 2013

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. - FORM 10-K - March 30, 2017

Attached files

West End Indiana Bancshares, Inc. Reports