Exhibit 99.2

THIS TRANSMITTAL CONTAINS IMPORTANT INFORMATION THAT IS OF INTEREST TO THE BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF THE SUBJECT SECURITIES. ALL DEPOSITORIES, CUSTODIANS AND OTHER INTERMEDIARIES RECEIVING THIS NOTICE ARE REQUESTED TO EXPEDITE RE-TRANSMITTAL TO SUCH BENEFICIAL OWNERS IN A TIMELY MANNER.

NOTICE TO THE HOLDERS OF CERTIFICATES ISSUED BY

AND OTHER POTENTIAL PARTIES-IN-INTEREST

(Appendices attached hereto are a part hereof)

This Notice (the “Notice”) is given to you by U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee” or “U.S. Bank”) for the Corporate-Backed Trust Certificates, Goldman Sachs Capital I Securities-Backed Series 2004-6 Trust (the “Trust”), established under the terms of that certain Series Supplement dated as of March 19, 2004 (the “Series Supplement”), by and between Lehman ABS Corporation (“LABS”), as Depositor, and the Trustee. The Series Supplement incorporates the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements between LABS, as Depositor, and the Trustee dated as of January 16, 2001 for Corporate Backed Trust Certificates (the “Standard Terms,” and together with the provisions of the Series Supplement, the “Trust Agreement”) with the Series Supplement provisions prevailing in the event of any inconsistency between the Standard Terms and the Series Supplement. A key component of the transaction is an interest rate swap with Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. (“LBSF”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Trust Agreement or in the prior notices referenced below which are incorporated herein by reference. Reference is made to our prior Notices including those dated September 18, 2008, May 28, 2009, April 25, 2011 and November 30, 2015, and April 27, 2016.

We are providing this Notice with respect to a decision rendered in the trust instruction proceeding filed by the Trustee in Minnesota Court. The Minnesota Court determined that the cost and expense of participating in mediation and defending the Complaint filed against the Trust by LBSF constitutes an Extraordinary Expense, it denied the Trustee’s petition to use Trust Property to pay the costs of defending the Trust without consent by 100% of Certificateholders, and it held the Trustee has no duty to incur litigation expenses to defend the Litigation.

In addition we are providing some information in Section II below with respect to a decision rendered by the Bankruptcy Court in a proceeding which is similar, but not identical to the Complaint.

Background

The background of the Lehman bankruptcy case and the Minnesota Trust Instruction Proceeding were described in detail in the Trustee’s prior notice of April 27, 2016 and that information is incorporated by reference herein.

I. The Minnesota Court Ruled in the Minnesota Trust Instruction

Proceeding.

On August 9, 2016, the Minnesota Court rendered its decision with respect to the Petition, a copy of which is attached hereto as Appendix A (the “Minnesota Decision”). Among other things, the Minnesota Court ruled that the costs and expenses of participating in the mediation and defending the Litigation constituted Extraordinary Expenses under the terms of the Trust Agreement. The Minnesota Court further ruled that there are three methods for paying Extraordinary Expenses: (a) from the Trust Property upon the consent of 100% of the Certificateholders, (b) a lesser percentage of the Certificateholders may request the Trustee to participate in the mediation and defend the Litigation and reimburse the Trustees for the cost thereof with their own funds, or (c) indemnification of the Trustee by the Depositor. Unless all three of these methods are “not available,” the Minnesota Court determined that there is no change in circumstances requiring a modification of the Trust.

The Trustee believes based on prior experience (a) that it is highly unlikely that 100% of the Certificateholders will be able to be identified² and/or consent to the use of Trust Property by the Trustee to participate in mediation and defend the Complaint (in fact, as mentioned above, one Certificateholder objected to the use of Trust Property for these purposes), and (b) while the Trustee has made a demand on LABS to honor its indemnification obligations, LABS has not responded to the Trustee’s demand and the Trustee does not know whether or not LABS would have the financial wherewithal to make any payments in connection with such obligation.

Therefore, consistent with the Minnesota Decision, the Litigation must be funded by a lesser percentage of Certificateholders who request and pay for the Trustee to participate in the mediation and defend the Trust with respect to the Litigation. Should a Certificateholder desire to request and fund the defense of the Litigation, please contact the Trustee as set forth below.

If you have questions concerning the foregoing, or wish to direct and instruct the Trustee in connection with the Complaint, please contact:

U.S. Bank National Association

Global Corporate Trust Services

190 South LaSalle Street, 10th Floor

Chicago, Illinois 60603

Attention: Mamta Scott

e-mail: mamta.scott@usbank.com

The Trustee continues to evaluate the Minnesota Decision, makes no representations regarding any future action the Trustee may or may not undertake with respect to the Litigation and Petition, and reserves all rights under the Trust Agreement.

II. The Bankruptcy Court Has Rendered an Important Decision in an Adversary

Proceeding With Respect to a Similar Though not Identical Transaction and

Facts.

On September 14, 2010, LBSF filed an action in the Bankruptcy Court against the trustees and the issuers for certain CDO transactions, and against noteholders, known or unknown, seeking to avoid certain priority of payment provisions relating to swap termination payments. The original proceeding was styled Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. v. Bank of America National Association, et al., Adversary Proceeding Number 10-03547, and the case is now pending before the Honorable Judge Chapman in the Bankruptcy Court. Subsequently LBSF filed three amendments to the initial complaint, filing the Fourth Amended Complaint on October 13, 2015 [ECF No. 1156] (the “Fourth Amended Complaint”). The Fourth Amended Complaint contained nineteen different counts that challenge the payments made by the trustees to noteholders in priority over LBSF’s termination payment, seeking to (a) claw back such payments from the noteholders receiving the payment, and/or (b) hold the trustees liable for making such payments.

Please be advised that on June 28, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court issued its Memorandum Decision On the Omnibus Motion of Noteholder Defendants to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint [ECF No. 1360] (the “Bankruptcy Court Decision”) and on July 18, 2016 the Bankruptcy Court entered an Order with respect to the Bankruptcy Court Decision [ECF No. 1371]. Pursuant to the Bankruptcy Court Decision and the Order, the Bankruptcy Court has dismissed, in full, Counts I – XIX of the Fourth Amended Complaint against each of the noteholder defendants and the trustee defendants.

The swap transactions that are the subject of the Bankruptcy Court Decision are not identical to the Swap Agreement at issue here, and certain facts may be different in ways the Bankruptcy Court may deem material. Nonetheless, the Bankruptcy Court Decision may be relevant to Certificateholders’ consideration of the mediation, Complaint and the matters set forth herein.

In addressing inquiries that may be directed to it, the Trustee may conclude that a specific response to a particular inquiry from an individual Certificateholder is not consistent with equal and full dissemination of information to all Certificateholders. Certificateholders should not rely on the Trustee as their sole source of information. The Trustee does not make any recommendation, or give any investment, tax, or legal advice. Each Certificateholder should seek advice from its own counsel and advisors based on the Certificateholder’s particular circumstances.

Recipients of this notice are cautioned that this notice is not evidence that the Trustee will recognize the recipient as a Certificateholder.

Appendix A

Minnesota Decision

The Petition For Instructions, dated April 25, 2016, (the “Petition”), came before this Court on June 13, 2016. The Court, having heard and considered the Petition, determines the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT

The Trustee’s customary fee for its services as Trustee, including but not limited to (i) the costs and expenses of preparing, sending and receiving all reports, statements, notices, returns, filings, solicitation of consent or instructions, or other communications required by this Trust Agreement, (ii) the costs and expenses of holding and making ordinary collection or payments on the assets of the Trust and of determining and making distributions, (iii) the costs and expenses of the Trust’s or Trustee’s counsel, accountants and other experts for ordinary or routing [sic] consultation or advice in connection with the establishment, administration and termination of the Trust, and (iv) any other costs and expenses that are, or reasonably should have been, expected to be incurred in the ordinary course of administration of the Trust.

2

Unless otherwise specified in the related Series Supplement, any and all costs, expenses or liabilities arising out of the establishment, existence or administration of the Trust, other than (i) Ordinary Expenses, and (ii) costs and expenses payable by a particular Certificateholder, the Trustee or the Depositor pursuant to this Trust Agreement.

all the holders of the Certificates then outstanding have directed the Trustee to incur such Extraordinary Trust Expenses. The Trustee may incur other Extraordinary Trust Expenses if any lesser percentage of the cenificateholders requesting such action pursuant hereto reimburse the Trustee for the cost thereof from their own funds in advance. If Extraordinary Trust Expenses are not approved unanimously as set forth in the first sentence of this Section 8(b), such Extraordinary Trust Expenses shall not be an obligation of the Trust, and the Trustee shall not file any claim against the Trust therefor notwithstanding failure of certificateholders to reimburse the Trustee

3

The Depositor agrees, to the extent the Trustee is not reimbursed pursuant to Section 706 hereof, to indemnify the Trustee against, and hold it harmless from, any loss, expense or liability, incurred in connection with any legal action relating to this Trust Agreement

4

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

5

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:

The Trustee’s request for payment of Extraordinary Expenses by the Trust is denied without prejudice pending further evidence that New York Law authorizes changing of the Trust terms.

6