Attached files

file filename
EX-31.3 - CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION - ICON ECI Fund Sixteenex-313icoj.htm
EX-32.3 - CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C - ICON ECI Fund Sixteenex-323icoj.htm
EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, - ICON ECI Fund Sixteenex-322icoj.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, - ICON ECI Fund Sixteenex-321icoj.htm
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBA - ICON ECI Fund Sixteenex-312icoj.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBA - ICON ECI Fund Sixteenex-311icoj.htm

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[x]        ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016
 
or
[  ]        TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
 
to
 
 
 
 
 
Commission file number:
 
333-185144
 
 
 
 
 
ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
 
80-0860084
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
3 Park Avenue, 36th Floor
 
 
New York, New York
 
10016
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
 
(212) 418-4700

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ☐    No ☑ 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes ☐    No ☑ 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ☑    No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes ☑    No ☐
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
 ☑      
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☐
Accelerated filer  ☐
Non-accelerated filer  ☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company  ☑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ☐    No ☑ 
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: Not applicable.  There is no established market for the Class A and Class I shares of the registrant.

Number of outstanding Class A and Class I shares of the registrant on March 27, 2017 is 17,189 and 410, respectively.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None.



Table of Contents
 
Page
 
 
 
 



PART I
 
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements within this Annual Report on Form 10-K may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). These statements are being made pursuant to the PSLRA, with the intention of obtaining the benefits of the “safe harbor” provisions of the PSLRA, and, other than as required by law, we assume no obligation to update or supplement such statements. Forward-looking statements are those that do not relate solely to historical fact. They include, but are not limited to, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance, achievements or events. You can identify these statements by the use of words such as “may,” “would,” “could,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “continue,” “further,” “plan,” “seek,” “intend,” “predict” or “project” and variations of these words or comparable words or phrases of similar meaning. These forward-looking statements reflect our current beliefs and expectations with respect to future events.  They are based on assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties and other factors outside our control that may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. We undertake no obligation to update publicly or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.
 
Item 1. Business
 
Our History
 
ICON ECI Fund Sixteen (the “Fund”) was formed on October 11, 2012 as a Delaware statutory trust. When used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the terms “we,” “us,” “our” or similar terms refer to the Fund and its consolidated subsidiaries. We have elected to be treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes.
 
Our managing owner is ICON MT 16, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Managing Owner”), and our investment manager is ICON Capital, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Investment Manager”). Wilmington Trust, National Association (the “Trustee”) serves as our sole trustee pursuant to our Third Amended and Restated Trust Agreement (the “Trust Agreement”). The Trustee delegated to our Managing Owner all of the power and authority to manage our business affairs, including, but not limited to, our investments in or that are collateralized by equipment and other corporate infrastructure (collectively, “Capital Assets”). Pursuant to the terms of our investment management agreement, our Managing Owner has engaged our Investment Manager to, among other things, originate and service our investments.  Additionally, our Managing Owner has a 1% interest in our profits, losses, distributions and liquidation proceeds.
 
Our initial capitalization was $1,001. Our offering period commenced on July 1, 2013 and ended on December 31, 2014. Our Managing Owner determined to cease our offering period earlier than originally anticipated as a result of lower than expected offering proceeds being raised. Our operating period commenced on January 1, 2015. We offered to sell to the public any combination of two classes of shares, Class A shares and Class I shares (collectively, the “Shares”), on a “best efforts” basis with the intention of raising up to $250,000,000 of capital, of which $9,000,000 had been reserved for issuance pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan (the “DRIP”). Other than differing allocable fees and expenses, the Class A shares and Class I shares have identical rights and privileges, such as identical voting and distribution rights. We reserved the right to reallocate the offering amount between the primary offering and the DRIP.
 
As of November 12, 2013 (the “Initial Closing Date”), we raised a minimum of $1,200,000 from the sale of our Shares, at which time shareholders were admitted and we commenced operations. As of June 13, 2014, we raised the $12,500,000 minimum offering amount for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Subsequent to the Initial Closing Date, we returned the initial capital contribution of $1,000 to CION Investment Group, LLC (formerly, ICON Investment Group, LLC) (the “Initial Shareholder”). From the commencement of our offering on July 1, 2013 through December 31, 2014, we sold 17,189 Class A shares to 351 Class A shareholders and 410 Class I shares to six Class I shareholders, of which 404 Class A shares and 12 Class I shares were issued pursuant to the DRIP, representing an aggregate of $17,469,610 of capital contributions. Pursuant to the terms of our offering, we established a cash reserve in the amount of 0.50% of the gross offering proceeds from the sale of our Shares. As of December 31, 2016, the reserve was $87,348. From the Initial Closing Date through December 31, 2014, we incurred sales commissions to third parties of $1,198,531 and dealer-manager and distribution fees of $347,547 to CION Securities, LLC, the dealer-manager of our offering and an affiliate of our Investment Manager (“CION Securities”). In addition, organization costs of $8,418 and offering expenses of $161,422 were incurred by us during such period. Organization costs were expensed when incurred and offering expenses were recorded as a reduction of shareholders’ equity.  
 


1


Our Business
 
We are a direct financing fund that primarily makes investments in domestic and international businesses, which investments are primarily structured as debt and debt-like financings (such as loans, leases and other structured financing transactions) in or that are collateralized by Capital Assets utilized by such companies to operate their businesses, as well as other strategic investments in or collateralized by Capital Assets that our Managing Owner believes will provide us with a satisfactory, risk-adjusted rate of return.
 
In the case of secured loans and other financing transactions, the principal and interest payments due under the loan are expected to provide a return of and a return on the amount we lend to borrowers. In the case of leases where there is significant current cash flow generated during the primary term of the lease and the value of the Capital Assets at the end of the term will be minimal or is not considered a primary reason for making the investment, the rental payments due under the lease are expected to be, in the aggregate, sufficient to provide a return of and a return on the purchase price of the leased Capital Assets. In the case of investments in leased Capital Assets that decline in value at a slow rate due to the long economic life of such Capital Assets, we expect that we will generate sufficient net proceeds at the end of the investment from the sale or re-lease of such Capital Assets to provide a return of and a return on our investment. In the case of operating leases, we expect most, if not all, of the return of and the return on such investments to be realized upon the sale or re-lease of the Capital Assets.  For leveraged leases, we expect the rental income we receive to be less than the purchase price of the Capital Assets because we will structure these transactions to utilize some or all of the lease rental payments to reduce the amount of non-recourse indebtedness used to acquire such assets.
 
In some cases with respect to the above investments, we may acquire equity interests, as well as warrants or other rights to acquire equity interests, in the borrower or lessee that may increase the expected return on our investments. 
 
We divide the life of the Fund into three distinct phases:
 
(1)
Offering Period: The period during which we offered and sold Shares to investors. We invested most of the net proceeds from the sale of Shares in Capital Assets.
 
(2)
Operating Period: After the close of the offering period, we have been reinvesting the cash generated from our initial investments to the extent that cash is not needed for our expenses, reserves and distributions to shareholders. We currently anticipate that the operating period will end five years from the end of our offering period.
 
(3)
Wind Down Period: After the operating period, we will then sell our assets and/or let our investments mature in the ordinary course of business. Our goal is to complete the wind down period within two years after the end of the operating period, but it may take longer to do so.
 
At December 31, 2016 and 2015, we had total assets of $14,832,970 and $19,122,189, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2016, we had one lessee and one borrower that accounted for 99.3% of our finance income. Our income from investment in joint ventures was primarily derived from our investment in five joint ventures. Net income attributable to us for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $8,182. For the year ended December 31, 2015, we had one lessee and one borrower that accounted for 100% of our finance income. Our income from investment in joint ventures was derived from our investment in six joint ventures. Net income attributable to us for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $287,459.
 
At December 31, 2016, our portfolio, which we hold either directly or through joint ventures, consisted of the following investments:
 
Mining Equipment

A 10% ownership interest in mining equipment that is subject to two 48-month leases with Blackhawk Mining, LLC (“Blackhawk”) and its affiliates, which expire in February 2018.

Seismic Testing Equipment
 
Land-based seismic testing equipment that is subject to a 36-month lease with Geokinetics Inc., Geokinetics USA, Inc. and Geokinetics Acquisition Company (collectively, “Geokinetics”), which expires in August 2017.



2



Geotechnical Drilling Vessels

A 10% ownership interest in two geotechnical drilling vessels, the Fugro Scout and the Fugro Voyager (collectively, the "Fugro Vessels"), which are subject to 12-year bareboat charters with affiliates of Fugro N.V. (“Fugro”), which expire in December 2027.
 
Notes Receivable
 
A term loan to CFL Momentum Beheer B.V. and C.V. CFL Momentum (collectively, “CFL”), secured by, among other things, a first priority security interest in and earnings from a motor cargo vessel, which matures in December 2020.

A term loan to Lubricating Specialties Company (“LSC”), secured by a second priority security interest in LSC's accounts receivable and inventory and a first priority security interest in all of LSC’s other assets, which matures in December 2020.
 
For a discussion of the significant transactions that we engaged in during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, please refer to “Item 7. Managing Owner’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
 
Segment Information
 
We are engaged in one business segment, the business of investing in Capital Assets, including, but not limited to, Capital Assets that are already subject to lease, Capital Assets that we purchase and lease to domestic and international businesses, loans secured by Capital Assets and ownership rights to leased Capital Assets at lease expiration.
  
Competition
 
The commercial leasing and finance industry is highly competitive and is characterized by competitive factors that vary based upon product and geographic region. Our competitors are varied and include other equipment leasing and finance funds, hedge funds, private equity funds, captive and independent finance companies, commercial and industrial banks, manufacturers and vendors. 
 
Other equipment finance companies and equipment manufacturers or their affiliated financing companies may have been and/or may be in a position to offer equipment to prospective customers on financial terms that were or are more favorable than those that we could offer or that we can currently offer. In addition, increased competition in the equipment financing business has caused us to encounter significant challenges. Specifically, we continue to suffer from increasing competition over the last few years from larger alternative lenders that had not historically competed with us for investment opportunities. Please refer to “Item 7. Managing Owner’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for a discussion of the effect of such increased competition on our results of operations.
 
We compete primarily on the basis of pricing, terms and structure, particularly on structuring flexible, responsive, and customized financing solutions for our customers. Our investments are often made directly rather than through competition in the open market. Nevertheless, to the extent that our competitors compete aggressively on any combination of the foregoing factors, we could fail to achieve our investment objectives.
 
Employees

We have no direct employees.  Our Managing Owner and our Investment Manager supervise and control our business affairs and originate and service our investments.
 

3


Available Information
 
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our most recent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and our Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports, are available free of charge on our Investment Manager’s internet website at http://www.iconinvestments.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The information contained on our Investment Manager’s website is not deemed part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our reports are also available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
 
Financial Information Regarding Geographic Areas
   
Certain of our investments may generate revenue in geographic areas outside of the United States. For additional information, see Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements.


4


Item 1A. Risk Factors
 
Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this item.
 
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable.  
 
Item 2. Properties
We neither own nor lease office space or any other real property in our business at the present time.  
 
Item 3. Legal Proceedings  
In the ordinary course of conducting our business, we may be subject to certain claims, suits, and complaints filed against us.  In our Managing Owner’s opinion, the outcome of such matters, if any, will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. We are not aware of any material legal proceedings that are currently pending against us or against any of our assets.  
 
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.  



5


PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Securities, Related Security Holder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
Overview
 
As of March 27, 2017
 
 
Class A
 
Class I
Number of shareholders
 
350
 
6
Number of Shares
 
17,189
 
410
 
We paid monthly distributions to each of our shareholders beginning the first month after each such shareholder was admitted through December 31, 2016. The payment of distributions remains subject to change and are made at our Managing Owner's discretion, with the amount and timing of such distributions based on our overall performance. For the year ended December 31, 2016, we paid distributions to our Managing Owner, Class A additional shareholders and Class I shareholders of $10,669, $1,031,649 and $24,605, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2015, we paid distributions to our Managing Owner, Class A additional shareholders and Class I shareholders of $14,182, $1,371,102 and $32,794, respectively. The terms of our revolving line of credit with California Bank & Trust (“CB&T”) could restrict us from paying distributions to our shareholders if such payment would cause us to not be in compliance with our financial covenants. See “Item 7. Managing Owner’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources - Financings and Borrowings - Revolving Line of Credit, Recourse.”
 
Our Shares are not publicly traded and there is no established public trading market for our Shares. Given that it is unlikely that any such market will develop, our Shares are generally considered illiquid. Even if a shareholder is able to sell our Shares, the price received may be less than our estimated value (“Estimated Value”) per Share indicated below.

Our Estimated Value per Share as of December 31, 2016 (the “Valuation Date”) has been determined to be $711.44 per Class A Share and $709.68 per Class I Share. The Estimated Value per Class A Share is based upon the Class A shareholders’ proportionate share of the estimated fair value of our assets less the estimated fair value of our liabilities, adjusted to include the sales commission trail payable that is only applicable to the Class A shareholders and further adjusted to exclude the distribution fee payable that is only applicable to the Class I shareholders, each as of the Valuation Date, divided by the total number of our Class A Shares outstanding as of the Valuation Date. The Estimated Value per Class I Share is based upon the Class I shareholders’ proportionate share of the estimated fair value of our assets less the estimated fair value of our liabilities, adjusted to include the distribution fee payable that is only applicable to the Class I shareholders and further adjusted to exclude the sales commission trail payable that is only applicable to the Class A shareholders, each as of the Valuation Date, divided by the total number of our Class I Shares outstanding as of the Valuation Date. To the extent an investment is owned by a joint venture, we only include our share of assets and liabilities based on our ownership percentage in such joint venture.* The proportionate share of the Estimated Value attributable to the Class A and Class I shareholders are allocated in proportion to the number of Class A and Class I Shares outstanding as of the Valuation Date. The information used to generate the Estimated Value per Share, including, but not limited to, market information, investment and asset-level data and other information provided by third parties, was the most recent information practically available as of the Valuation Date. This Estimated Value per Share is provided to assist (i) plan fiduciaries in fulfilling their annual valuation obligations as required by The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), and (ii) broker-dealers that participated in our offering of Shares in meeting their customer account statement reporting obligations as required by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”).

 The Estimated Value per Class A Share and per Class I Share were calculated by our Investment Manager primarily based on the fair values provided by Duff & Phelps, LLC ("Duff & Phelps"), a third-party independent valuation and consulting firm engaged by our Investment Manager to provide material assistance related to the valuation of certain of our assets and liabilities, as further described below. The engagement of Duff & Phelps was approved by our Investment Manager. Duff & Phelps is a global valuation and corporate finance advisor with expertise in complex valuation.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________
* An investment or a long-term debt obligation described in this Item 5 may not be consolidated and presented on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016, but rather included as part of investment in joint ventures on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016.


6


Process and Methodology
 
Our Investment Manager established the Estimated Value per Share as of the Valuation Date primarily based on the fair values of certain of our assets and liabilities provided by Duff & Phelps. In arriving at its fair value, Duff & Phelps utilized valuation methodologies that both our Investment Manager and Duff & Phelps believe are standard and acceptable in the Capital Asset financing industry for the types of assets and liabilities held by us. The valuation was performed in accordance with standard industry practice and the provisions of NASD Rule 2340 and FINRA Rule 2310. The basis of fair values provided by Duff & Phelps are in accordance with the definition of fair value in Accounting Standards Codification 820. For investments that were acquired during the year ended December 31, 2016, fair values are estimated by our Investment Manager to approximate net carrying values due to the short amount of time that passed between the date we entered into such investments and the Valuation Date.

A summary of the methodology used by Duff & Phelps, as well as the assumptions and limitations of their work for us and of our determination of Estimated Value, are presented below.
 
Discounted Cash Flow
 
The discounted cash flow (“DCF”) method was used to estimate value using the concept of the time value of money. All projected future cash flows accruing to an asset or liability were estimated and discounted to give their present values. The sum of all projected future cash flows, both incoming and outgoing, comprises the net present value, which was recognized as the value or price of the cash flows.
 
Valuation of Notes Receivable
 
The estimated fair value of our two notes receivable at the Valuation Date was estimated by our Investment Manager to approximate their net carrying values due to the short amount of time that passed between the date we entered into such notes receivable and the Valuation Date.

Valuation of Operating Lease
 
The estimated fair value of our operating lease at the Valuation Date was derived by applying the DCF method to projected cash flows that included all lease payments, fees and residual value assumptions for purchase at the end of the lease term. Under the DCF method, the projected cash flows were discounted at the Valuation Date using a discount rate reflecting the risks associated with the asset and the time value of money.
 
The discount rates used ranged from 7.7% to 8.7%.

Valuation of Finance Leases
 
The estimated fair value of our finance leases at the Valuation Date was derived by applying the DCF method to projected cash flows that included all lease payments, fees and residual value assumptions for purchase at the end of the lease term. Under the DCF method, the projected cash flows were discounted at the Valuation Date using a discount rate reflecting the risks associated with the asset and the time value of money.
 
The discount rates used ranged from 11.9% to 15.5%.
 
Valuation of Long-term Obligations

The estimated fair value at the Valuation Date of our long-term obligations was derived by applying the DCF method to the projected cash flows accruing to each obligation, using a discount rate reflecting the risks associated with each such obligation and the time value of money. The discounted projected cash flows included all unpaid principal, interest, and fee payments for the scheduled term period of the obligation. An analysis of the borrower was conducted to determine viability of payment, total debt coverage as well as to ascertain the borrower's risk level, with such considerations reflected in the implied discount rate used in discounting the cash flows.

The discount rates used ranged from 3.7% to 8.7%.
 



7


Cash, Other Assets and Other Liabilities
 
Cash, other assets and other liabilities (collectively, “Other Net Assets”) include our share of items of tangible or monetary value as of the Valuation Date. The fair values of Other Net Assets as of the Valuation Date were estimated by our Investment Manager to approximate their carrying values because of their nature or short-term maturities. Excluded from Other Net Assets is our share of deferred financing costs, prepaid expenses and deferred revenue, which our Investment Manager estimated as having a minimal fair value as of the Valuation Date.
 
Assumptions and Limitations
 
As with any valuation methodology, the methodologies used to determine our Estimated Value per Share are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may prove later to be inaccurate or incomplete. Further, different market participants using different estimates and assumptions could derive different estimated values. Our Estimated Value per Share may also not represent the price that our Shares would trade at on a national securities exchange, the amount realized in a sale, merger or liquidation, or the amount a shareholder would realize in a private sale of our Shares.

The Estimated Value per Share calculated by our Investment Manager is based on economic, market and other conditions and the information available to us and Duff & Phelps as of the Valuation Date. The Estimated Value per Share is expected to fluctuate over time in response to future events, including, but not limited to, changes in market interest rates, changes in economic, market and regulatory conditions, the prospects of the asset sectors in general or in particular, or the special purpose vehicles in which the assets may be held, rental and growth rates, returns on competing investments, changes in administrative expenses and other costs, and the amount of distributions paid on our Shares. The Estimated Value per Share may also change as a result of changes in the circumstances of the risks associated with each investment.

There is no assurance that the methodologies used to calculate the Estimated Value per Share would be acceptable to FINRA or in compliance with guidelines promulgated under ERISA with respect to their respective reporting requirements.

Our Investment Manager is ultimately and solely responsible for the establishment of our Estimated Value per Share. In arriving at its determination of the Estimated Value per Share, our Investment Manager considered all information provided in light of its own familiarity with our assets and liabilities and the estimated fair values recommended by Duff & Phelps.

We currently expect that our next Estimated Value per Share will be based upon our assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2017 and such value will be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2017. We intend to publish an updated Estimated Value per Class A Share and per Class I Share annually in our subsequent Annual Reports on Form 10-K.


Item 6. Selected Financial Data
 
Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this item.

8


Item 7. Managing Owner's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
Our Managing Owner’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations relates to our consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Statements made in this section may be considered forward-looking. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially because of these risks and assumptions, including, among other things, factors discussed in “Part I. Forward-Looking Statements” located elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
Overview
 
We are a direct financing fund that primarily makes investments in domestic and international businesses, which investments are primarily structured as debt and debt-like financings (such as loans, leases and other structured financing transactions) in or that are collateralized by Capital Assets utilized by such companies to operate their businesses, as well as other strategic investments in or collateralized by Capital Assets that our Managing Owner believes will provide us with a satisfactory, risk-adjusted rate of return. We were formed as a Delaware statutory trust and are treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes.
 
Our offering period commenced on July 1, 2013 and ended on December 31, 2014. Our Managing Owner determined to cease our offering period earlier than originally anticipated as a result of lower than expected offering proceeds being raised. Our operating period commenced on January 1, 2015. As of the Initial Closing Date, we raised a minimum of $1,200,000 from the sale of our Shares, at which time shareholders were admitted and we commenced operations. As of June 13, 2014, we raised the $12,500,000 minimum offering amount for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Subsequent to the Initial Closing Date, we returned the initial capital contribution of $1,000 to the Initial Shareholder. From the commencement of our offering on July 1, 2013 through December 31, 2014, we sold 17,189 Class A shares to 351 Class A shareholders and 410 Class I shares to six Class I shareholders, of which 404 Class A shares and 12 Class I shares were issued pursuant to the DRIP, representing an aggregate of $17,469,610 of capital contributions. From the Initial Closing Date through December 31, 2014, we incurred sales commissions to third parties of $1,198,531 and dealer-manager and distribution fees to CION Securities of $347,547. In addition, organization costs of $8,418 and offering expenses of $161,422 were incurred by us during such period.
 
After the net offering proceeds were invested, we have been reinvesting the cash generated from our initial investments to the extent that cash is not used for our expenses, reserves and distributions to our shareholders. We currently anticipate investing and reinvesting in Capital Assets from time to time during our five year operating period. After the operating period, we will then sell our assets and/or let our investments mature in the ordinary course of business, during a time frame called the “wind down period.”
 
Our Trustee serves as our sole trustee pursuant to the Trust Agreement and has delegated to our Managing Owner all of the power and authority to manage our business and affairs, including, but not limited to, our investments in Capital Assets. Pursuant to the terms of our investment management agreement, our Managing Owner has engaged our Investment Manager to, among other things, originate and service our investments.
 
Current Business Environment
 
Recent trends indicate that domestic and global equipment financing volume is correlated to overall business investments in equipment, which are typically impacted by general economic conditions. As the economy slows or builds momentum, the demand for productive equipment generally slows or builds and equipment financing volume generally decreases or increases, depending on a number of factors. These factors include the availability of liquidity to provide equipment financing and/or provide it on terms satisfactory to borrowers, lessees, and other counterparties, as well as the desire to upgrade equipment and/or expand operations during times of growth, but also in times of recession in order to, among other things, seize the opportunity to obtain competitive advantage over distressed competitors and/or increase business as the economy recovers.
 
Our Investment Manager is cautiously optimistic that the U.S. economy’s recovery will continue throughout 2017 and into 2018. An overall improvement in the unemployment rate, which was 4.7% as of December 31, 2016, as well as price increases in energy and other commodities, have resulted in stock market gains and an increase in loan prices. However, continued increases in the U.S. dollar could have an adverse impact on net exports and energy and other commodity prices.


  

9


Significant Transactions
 
We engaged in the following significant transactions during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
 
Mining Equipment
 
On September 12, 2013, a joint venture owned by us, ICON Leasing Fund Eleven Liquidating Trust (formerly, ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC) (“Fund Eleven”) and ICON Leasing Fund Twelve Liquidating Trust (formerly, ICON Leasing Fund Twelve, LLC) (“Fund Twelve”), each an entity also managed by our Investment Manager, purchased mining equipment for $15,106,570. The equipment was subject to a 24-month lease with Murray Energy Corporation and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Murray”). On December 1, 2013 and February 1, 2014, we contributed capital of $933,678 and $1,725,517, respectively, to the joint venture, inclusive of acquisition fees. Subsequent to our second capital contribution, the joint venture was owned 19.8% by us, 67% by Fund Eleven and 13.2% by Fund Twelve. The lease was scheduled to expire on September 30, 2015, but was extended for one month with an additional lease payment of $635,512. On October 29, 2015, Murray purchased the equipment pursuant to the terms of the lease for $2,991,400. As a result, a gain on sale of assets of $448,710 was recognized by the joint venture, of which our share was $88,845. Pursuant to a remarketing agreement with a third party, the joint venture paid an aggregate remarketing fee of $766,466 as part of the transaction.
 
On March 4, 2014, a joint venture owned 10% by us, 60% by Fund Twelve, 15% by ICON Equipment and Corporate Infrastructure Fund Fourteen, L.P. (“Fund Fourteen”) and 15% by ICON ECI Fund Fifteen, L.P. (“Fund Fifteen”), each an entity also managed by our Investment Manager, purchased mining equipment from an affiliate of Blackhawk. Simultaneously, the mining equipment was leased to Blackhawk and its affiliates for four years. The aggregate purchase price for the mining equipment of $25,359,446 was funded by $17,859,446 in cash and $7,500,000 of non-recourse long-term debt. Our contribution to the joint venture was $1,795,597. On October 27, 2015, the joint venture amended the lease with Blackhawk to waive Blackhawk’s breach of a financial covenant during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 in consideration for a partial prepayment of $3,502,514, which included an amendment fee of $75,000. In addition, corresponding amendments were made to certain payment and repurchase provisions of the lease to account for the partial prepayment. On December 8, 2015 and December 7, 2016, the joint venture further amended the lease with Blackhawk to, among other things, add, revise and/or waive Blackhawk’s breach of certain financial covenants and received additional amendment fees of $75,000 and $150,000, respectively.

Trucks and Trailers

On March 28, 2014, a joint venture owned 12.5% by us, 60% by Fund Twelve and 27.5% by Fund Fifteen purchased trucks, trailers and other equipment from subsidiaries of D&T Holdings, LLC ("D&T") for $12,200,000. Simultaneously, the trucks, trailers and other equipment were leased to D&T and its subsidiaries for 57 months. Our contribution to the joint venture was $1,484,705. On September 15, 2014, the lease agreement with D&T was amended to allow D&T to increase its capital expenditure limit. In consideration for agreeing to such increase, lease payments of $1,480,000 that were scheduled to be paid in 2018 were paid by October 31, 2014. In addition, the joint venture received an amendment fee of $100,000. On January 14, 2016, D&T satisfied its remaining lease obligations by making a prepayment of $8,000,000. In addition, D&T exercised its option to repurchase all assets under the lease for $1, upon which title was transferred. As a result of the prepayment, the joint venture recognized finance income of approximately $1,400,000, of which our share was approximately $175,000.

Seismic Testing Equipment
 
On September 4, 2014, a joint venture owned 52% by us, 33.5% by Fund Fourteen and 14.5% by ICON ECI Partners L.P. (“ECI Partners”), an entity also managed by our Investment Manager, purchased certain land-based seismic testing equipment for $10,677,018. Simultaneously, the seismic testing equipment was leased to Geokinetics for three years. During 2016 and 2015, due to damage to certain of the assets on lease, we received a total of $48,076 and $216,023, respectively, based on the stipulated loss values of such assets pursuant to the lease agreement. As a result, future minimum rents receivable and residual values were reduced and we recognized additional finance income of $4,760 and $11,083 during 2016 and 2015, respectively.

On February 15, 2017, we purchased all of ECI Partners’ limited liability company interests in the joint venture for a purchase price of $501,794. As a result, the joint venture is owned 66.5% by us and 33.5% by Fund Fourteen.





Auto Manufacturing Equipment

10


 
On July 10, 2015, a joint venture owned 10% by us, 50% by Fund Fifteen and 40% by Fund Fourteen purchased auxiliary support equipment and robots used in the production of certain automobiles for $9,934,118, which were simultaneously leased to Challenge Mfg. Company, LLC and certain of its affiliates (collectively, "Challenge") for 60 months. Our contribution to the joint venture was $998,379. On June 8, 2016, an unaffiliated third party purchased 100% of the limited liability company interests of the joint venture for net sales proceeds of $9,004,214. No significant gain or loss was recorded by us as a result of the sale.
 
On December 29, 2015, a joint venture owned 25% by us and 75% by Fund Fifteen purchased stamping presses and miscellaneous support equipment used in the production of certain automobiles for $11,978,455, which were simultaneously leased to Challenge for 60 months. Our contribution to the joint venture was $3,009,587. On June 8, 2016, an unaffiliated third party purchased 100% of the limited liability company interests of the joint venture for net sales proceeds of $11,551,806. As a result, we recorded a gain on sale of investment in joint venture of $17,681.
 
Geotechnical Drilling Vessels
 
On December 23, 2015, a joint venture owned 10% by us, 75% by Fund Fifteen and 15% by Fund Fourteen, through two indirect subsidiaries, entered into memoranda of agreement to purchase the Fugro Vessels from affiliates of Fugro for an aggregate purchase price of $130,000,000. The Fugro Scout and the Fugro Voyager were delivered on December 24, 2015 and January 8, 2016, respectively. The Fugro Vessels were bareboat chartered to affiliates of Fugro for a period of 12 years upon the delivery of each respective vessel, although such charters can be terminated by the indirect subsidiaries after year five. On December 24, 2015, the Fugro Scout was acquired for (i) $8,250,000 in cash, (ii) $45,500,000 of financing through a senior secured loan from ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (“ABN AMRO”), Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (“Rabobank”) and NIBC Bank N.V. (“NIBC”) and (iii) a seller's credit of $11,250,000. As of December 31, 2015, the cash portion of the purchase price for the Fugro Voyager of approximately $10,221,000 was being held by the applicable indirect subsidiary of the joint venture until delivery of the vessel. On January 8, 2016, the Fugro Voyager was also acquired for $8,250,000 in cash, $45,500,000 of financing through a senior secured loan from ABN AMRO, Rabobank and NIBC and a seller's credit of $11,250,000. The senior secured loans bear interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 2.95% per year and mature on December 31, 2020. On February 8, 2016, the two indirect subsidiaries entered into interest rate swap agreements to effectively fix the interest rate of the senior secured loans from a variable rate of LIBOR plus 2.95% per year to a fixed rate of 4.117% per year. Our contribution to the joint venture totaling $2,377,250 was made in December 2015.

As a result of Fugro obtaining additional third party financing, effective December 31, 2016, the indirect subsidiaries and the affiliates of Fugro amended the bareboat charters to, among other things, increase the daily charter rate and provide for additional security deposits. Also, effective December 31, 2016, the indirect subsidiaries amended the facility agreement with ABN AMRO, Rabobank and NIBC to, among other things, increase the interest rate on the senior secured loans to share the economic benefits of the amended bareboat charters.

Notes Receivable
 
On September 24, 2014, we, Fund Twelve, Fund Fourteen and Fund Fifteen entered into a secured term loan credit facility agreement with Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc. ("Premier Trailer") to provide a credit facility of up to $20,000,000, of which our commitment of $2,500,000 was funded on such date. The loan bore interest at LIBOR, subject to a 1% floor, plus 9% per year, and was scheduled to mature on September 24, 2020. The loan was secured by a second priority security interest in all of Premier Trailer’s assets, including, without limitation, its fleet of trailers, and the equity interests of Premier Trailer. On August 9, 2016, Premier Trailer satisfied its obligations in connection with the loan by making a prepayment of $2,581,944, comprised of all outstanding principal, accrued interest and a prepayment fee of $50,000. The prepayment fee was recognized as additional finance income.

On December 20, 2016, we, Fund Fourteen and Fund Fifteen entered into a secured term loan credit facility agreement with CFL to provide a credit facility of up to $7,400,000, of which our commitment of $592,000 was funded on December 21, 2016. The loan bears interest at 8% per year and we are entitled to an equity participation fee based partly on the fair market value of the vessel upon repayment of the loan. The loan is for a period of four years, maturing on December 21, 2020. The loan is secured by, among other things, a first priority security interest in and earnings from a motor cargo vessel.

On December 30, 2016, we, Fund Fourteen and Fund Fifteen entered into a secured term loan agreement with LSC to provide a loan in the aggregate amount of $32,500,000, of which our commitment of $2,600,000 was funded on such date. The loan bears interest at LIBOR, subject to a 1% floor, plus 11.0% per year, and is for a period of four years maturing on December 30, 2020. The loan is secured by a second priority security interest in LSC's accounts receivable and inventory and a first priority security interest in all of LSC’s other assets.

11


The following table includes additional information on the significant transactions that we engaged in from the Initial Closing Date through December 31, 2016:
 
Portfolio Company
 
Structure
 
Equity Invested
 
Interest Rate
 
Expiration/      Maturity Date
 
Collateral/Priority
 
Net Carrying Value
 
Credit Loss Reserve
 
Current Status
Blackhawk Mining, LLC (1)
 
Lease
 
$1,795,597
 
N/A
 
2/28/2018
 
Ownership of mining equipment
 
$792,421 (2) 
 
None
 
Performing
Geokinetics, Inc.
 
Lease
 
$5,690,851
 
N/A
 
8/31/2017
 
Ownership of seismic testing equipment
 
$1,959,453 (3) 
 
None
 
Performing
Fugro N.V. (1)
 
Lease
 
$2,377,250
 
N/A
 
12/24/2027
 
Ownership of geotechnical drilling vessels
 
$2,547,935 (2) 
 
None
 
Performing
CFL Momentum Beheer B.V. and C.V. CFL Momentum
 
Loan
 
$580,160
 
8%
 
12/21/2020
 
First priority in and earnings from a motor cargo vessel
 
$581,068 (4) 
 
None
 
Performing
Lubricating Specialties Company
 
Loan
 
$2,418,000
 
LIBOR, subject to 1% floor, plus 11%
 
12/30/2020
 
Second priority in accounts receivable and inventory and first priority in all other assets
 
$2,418,267 (4) 
 
None
 
Performing
Murray Energy Corporation (1)
 
Lease
 
$2,659,195
 
N/A
 
10/29/2015
 
Ownership of mining equipment
 
$1,351 (5) 
 
None
 
Expired (6)
D&T Holdings, LLC (1)
 
Lease
 
$1,484,705
 
N/A
 
12/31/2018
 
Ownership of trucks, trailers and equipment
 
 
None
 
Prepaid (7)
Challenge Mfg. Company, LLC (1)
 
Lease
 
$998,379
 
N/A
 
7/9/2020
 
Ownership of auxiliary support equipment and robots
 
 
None
 
Sold (8)
Challenge Mfg. Company, LLC (1)
 
Lease
 
$3,009,587
 
N/A
 
1/9/2021
 
Ownership of stamping presses and support equipment
 
$16 (5) 
 
None
 
Sold (8)
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.
 
Loan
 
$2,626,471
 
LIBOR, subject to 1% floor, plus 9%
 
9/24/2020
 
Second priority in all assets and equity interests
 
 
None
 
Prepaid (9)
(1) Our investment in this portfolio company is or was through a joint venture and is or was included in our consolidated balance sheets as investment in joint ventures.
(2) Net carrying value of our investment in joint ventures is calculated as follows: investment at cost plus/less our share of the cumulative net income/loss of the joint venture and less distributions received since the date of our initial investment.
(3) This investment is through a joint venture that we consolidated and presented on our consolidated balance sheets as net investment in finance lease.  Net investment in finance lease is the sum of the remaining minimum lease payments receivable, the estimated residual value of the asset and the unamortized initial direct costs, less unearned income.  Net carrying value represents our proportionate share of the investment and includes the recognition of an investment by noncontrolling interests for the share of such investment held by the joint venture’s noncontrolling interest holders.
(4) Net carrying value of our investment in note receivable is the sum of the remaining principal outstanding and the unamortized initial direct costs, less deferred fees.
(5) Represents our proportionate share of the remaining cash balance held by the joint venture.
(6) Please refer to the disclosure under the subheading "Mining Equipment" above for additional information related to the expired lease with Murray.
(7) Please refer to the disclosure under the subheading "Trucks and Trailers" above for additional information related to the prepayment of the lease by D&T.
(8) Please refer to the disclosure under the subheading "Auto Manufacturing Equipment" above for additional information related to the sale of interests in the joint venture that owns the equipment subject to the lease.
(9) Please refer to the disclosure under the subheading "Notes Receivable" above for additional information related to the prepayment of the secured term loan by Premier Trailer.

Acquisition Fees
 
We incurred acquisition fees to our Investment Manager of $0 and $424,701 during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Acquisition fees payable of $0 and $399,865 are included in due to Investment Manager and affiliates, net on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.


12


Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern: Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”), which provides guidance about management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. We adopted ASU 2014-15 on December 31, 2016, which did not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01, Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items: Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items (“ASU 2015-01”), which simplifies income statement presentation by eliminating the concept of extraordinary items. We adopted ASU 2015-01 on January 1, 2016, which did not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, Consolidation - Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis (“ASU 2015-02”), which modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities or voting interest entities, eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership, and affects the consolidation analysis by reducing the frequency of application of related party guidance and excluding certain fees in the primary beneficiary determination. We adopted ASU 2015-02 on January 1, 2016, which did not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (“ASU 2015-03”), which requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of such debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. In August 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, Interest - Imputation of Interest: Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements (“ASU 2015-15”), which further specifies the SEC staff’s view on the presentation and subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs associated with line of credit arrangements. We adopted ASU 2015-03 on January 1, 2016, which did not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements. In addition, we adopted ASU 2015-15 on January 1, 2016 and continue to present debt issuance costs associated with our revolving line of credit as other assets on our consolidated balance sheets.

Other Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), requiring revenue to be recognized in an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received in exchange for goods and services. This new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented, or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. In August 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers - Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU 2015-14”), which defers implementation of ASU 2014-09 by one year. Under such deferral, the adoption of ASU 2014-09 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted, but not before our original effective date of January 1, 2017. Our evaluation of the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 on our consolidated financial statements is ongoing and our implementation efforts have included the identification of revenue within the scope of the guidance and the evaluation of applicable revenue contracts. We continue to evaluate the timing of recognition of various revenue; however, since a substantial portion of our revenue is recognized from our leasing contracts, which is subject to ASU 2016-02 (as defined below), such revenue is excluded from our evaluation of ASU 2014-09.

In January 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”), which provides guidance related to accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, FASB clarified guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. The adoption of ASU 2016-01 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-01 on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”), which requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms greater than twelve months on the balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 implements changes to lessor accounting focused on conforming with certain changes made to lessee accounting and the recently released revenue recognition guidance. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on our consolidated financial statements.


13


In March 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-07, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures: Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting (“ASU 2016-07”), which eliminates the retroactive adjustments to an investment upon it qualifying for the equity method of accounting as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence by the investor. ASU 2016-07 requires that the equity method investor add the cost of acquiring the additional interest in the investee to the current basis of the investor’s previously held interest and adopt the equity method of accounting as of the date the investment qualifies for equity method accounting. The adoption of ASU 2016-07 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2016-07 is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (“ASU 2016-13”), which modifies the measurement of credit losses by eliminating the probable initial recognition threshold set forth in current guidance, and instead reflects an entity’s current estimate of all expected credit losses. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. An entity will apply the amendments within ASU 2016-13 through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The adoption of ASU 2016-13 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2020, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-13 on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”), which provides guidance on how certain cash receipts and cash payments are to be presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. An entity will apply the amendments within ASU 2016-15 using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-15 on our consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-17, Consolidation (“ASU 2016-17”), which amends the consolidation guidance on how a reporting entity that is the single decision maker of a variable interest entity should treat indirect interests in such entity held by related parties that are under common control with the reporting entity when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of that variable interest entity. Under ASU 2016-17, a single decision maker is not required to consider indirect interests held by related parties that are under common control with the single decision maker to be the equivalent of direct interests in their entirety. The adoption of ASU 2016-17 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. As a result of our adoption of ASU 2015-02 on January 1, 2016, we are required to apply the amendments within ASU 2016-17 retrospectively to when we initially applied the amendments within ASU 2015-02. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-17 on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (“ASU 2016-18”), which provides guidance on the presentation of restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. The adoption of ASU 2016-18 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. An entity will apply the amendments within ASU 2016-18 using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-18 on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (“ASU 2017-01”), which clarifies the definition of a business. ASU 2017-01 sets forth requirements to be met for a set to be deemed a business and establishes a practical way to determine when a set is not a business. To be considered a business, a set must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create an output, and removes the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace missing elements. In addition, ASU 2017-01 narrows the definition of outputs and aligns such definition with how outputs are described within the revenue guidance. The adoption of ASU 2017-01 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted for transactions that occur before the issuance date or effective date of ASU 2017-01 to the extent that such transactions have not been reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2017-01 on our consolidated financial statements.
 
We do not believe any other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
 

14


Critical Accounting Policies
An understanding of our critical accounting policies is necessary to understand our financial results. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires our Managing Owner to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates primarily include the determination of credit loss reserves, impairment losses and residual values. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We applied our critical accounting policies and estimation methods consistently in all periods presented. We consider the following accounting policies to be critical to our business:
 
·   Lease classification and revenue recognition;
·   Asset impairments;
·   Notes receivable and revenue recognition; and
·   Credit quality of notes receivable and finance leases and credit loss reserve.
 
Lease Classification and Revenue Recognition
Each equipment lease we enter into is classified as either a finance lease or an operating lease, based upon the terms of each lease. The estimated residual value is a critical component of and can directly influence the determination as to whether a lease is classified as an operating or a finance lease.
 
Our Investment Manager has an investment committee that approves each new equipment lease and other financing transaction. As part of its process, the investment committee determines the estimated residual value, if any, to be used once the investment has been approved. The factors considered in determining the residual value include, but are not limited to, the creditworthiness of the potential lessee, the type of equipment considered, how the equipment is integrated into the potential lessee’s business, the length of the lease and the industry in which the potential lessee operates. Residual values are reviewed for impairment in accordance with our impairment review policy.
 
The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the marketplace are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. The residual value is calculated using information from various external sources, such as trade publications, auction data, equipment dealers, wholesalers and industry experts, as well as inspection of the physical asset and other economic indicators.
 
For finance leases, we capitalize, at lease inception, the total minimum lease payments receivable from the lessee, the estimated unguaranteed residual value of the equipment at lease termination and the initial direct costs related to the lease, less unearned income. Unearned income represents the difference between the sum of the minimum lease payments receivable, plus the estimated unguaranteed residual value, minus the cost of the leased equipment. Unearned income is recognized as finance income over the term of the lease using the effective interest rate method.
 
For operating leases, rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Billed operating lease receivables are included in accounts receivable until collected or written off. We record a reserve if we deem any receivable not collectible. The difference between the timing of the cash received and the income recognized on a straight-line basis is recognized as either deferred revenue or other assets, as appropriate. Initial direct costs are capitalized as a component of the cost of the equipment and depreciated over the lease term.
 
Asset Impairments
The significant assets in our portfolio are periodically reviewed, no less frequently than annually or when indicators of impairment exist, to determine whether events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss will be recognized only if the carrying value of a long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair market value. If there is an indication of impairment, we will estimate the future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) expected from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Future cash flows are the future cash inflows expected to be generated by an asset less the future outflows expected to be necessary to obtain those inflows. If an impairment is determined to exist, the impairment loss will be measured as the amount by which the carrying value of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value and recorded in our consolidated statements of operations in the period the determination is made.
 



15


The events or changes in circumstances that generally indicate that an asset may be impaired are (i) the estimated fair value of the underlying asset is less than its carrying value or (ii) the lessee is experiencing financial difficulties and it does not appear likely that the estimated proceeds from the disposition of the asset will be sufficient to satisfy the residual position in the asset. The preparation of the undiscounted cash flows requires the use of assumptions and estimates, including the level of future rents, the residual value expected to be realized upon disposition of the asset, estimated downtime between re-leasing events and the amount of re-leasing costs. Our Investment Manager’s review for impairment includes a consideration of the existence of impairment indicators including third-party appraisals, published values for similar assets, recent transactions for similar assets, adverse changes in market conditions for specific asset types and the occurrence of significant adverse changes in general industry and market conditions that could affect the fair value of the asset.
 
Notes Receivable and Revenue Recognition
Notes receivable are reported in our consolidated balance sheets at the outstanding principal balance, plus costs incurred to originate the loans, net of any unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans. We use the effective interest rate method to recognize finance income, which produces a constant periodic rate of return on the investment. Unearned income, discounts and premiums are amortized to finance income in our consolidated statements of operations using the effective interest rate method. Interest receivable related to the unpaid principal is recorded separately from the outstanding balance in our consolidated balance sheets. Upon the prepayment of a note receivable, any prepayment penalties and unamortized loan origination, closing and commitment fees are recorded as part of finance income in our consolidated statements of operations. Our notes receivable may contain a paid-in-kind (“PIK”) interest provision. Any PIK interest, if deemed collectible, will be added to the principal balance of the note receivable and is recorded as income.
 
Credit Quality of Notes Receivable and Finance Leases and Credit Loss Reserve
Our Investment Manager monitors the ongoing credit quality of our financing receivables by (i) reviewing and analyzing a borrower’s financial performance on a regular basis, including review of financial statements received on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis as prescribed in the loan or lease agreement, (ii) tracking the relevant credit metrics of each financing receivable and a borrower’s compliance with financial and non-financial covenants, (iii) monitoring a borrower’s payment history and public credit rating, if available, and (iv) assessing our exposure based on the current investment mix. As part of the monitoring process, our Investment Manager may physically inspect the collateral or a borrower’s facility and meet with a borrower’s management to better understand such borrower’s financial performance and its future plans on an as-needed basis. 
 
As our financing receivables, generally notes receivable and finance leases, are limited in number, our Investment Manager is able to estimate the credit loss reserve based on a detailed analysis of each financing receivable as opposed to using portfolio-based metrics. Our Investment Manager does not use a system of assigning internal risk ratings to each of our financing receivables. Rather, each financing receivable is analyzed quarterly and categorized as either performing or non-performing based on certain factors including, but not limited to, financial results, satisfying scheduled payments and compliance with financial covenants. A financing receivable is usually categorized as non-performing only when a borrower experiences financial difficulties and has failed to make scheduled payments. Our Investment Manager then analyzes whether the financing receivable should be placed on a non-accrual status, a credit loss reserve should be established or the financing receivable should be restructured. As part of the assessment, updated collateral value is usually considered and such collateral value can be based on a third party industry expert appraisal or, depending on the type of collateral and accessibility to relevant published guides or market sales data, internally derived fair value. Material events would be specifically disclosed in the discussion of each financing receivable held. 
 
Financing receivables are generally placed on a non-accrual status when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, our Investment Manager periodically reviews the creditworthiness of companies with payments outstanding less than 90 days and based upon our Investment Manager’s judgment, these accounts may be placed on a non-accrual status.
 
In accordance with the cost recovery method, payments received on non-accrual financing receivables are applied to principal if there is doubt regarding the ultimate collectability of principal. If collection of the principal of non-accrual financing receivables is not in doubt, interest income is recognized on a cash basis. Financing receivables on non-accrual status may not be restored to accrual status until all delinquent payments have been received, and we believe recovery of the remaining unpaid receivable is probable.
 





16


When our Investment Manager deems it is probable that we will not be able to collect all contractual principal and interest on a non-performing financing receivable, we perform an analysis to determine if a credit loss reserve is necessary. This analysis considers the estimated cash flows from the financing receivable, and/or the collateral value of the asset underlying the financing receivable when financing receivable repayment is collateral dependent. If it is determined that the impaired value of the non-performing financing receivable is less than the net carrying value, we will recognize a credit loss reserve or adjust the existing credit loss reserve with a corresponding charge to earnings. We then charge off a financing receivable in the period that it is deemed uncollectible by reducing the credit loss reserve and the balance of the financing receivable.
  
Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 (“2016”) and 2015 (“2015”)
 
The following percentages are only as of a stated period and are not expected to be comparable in future periods. Further, these percentages are only representative of the percentage of the carrying value of such assets or finance income as of each stated period, and as such are not indicative of the concentration of any asset type or customer by the amount of equity invested or our investment portfolio as a whole.
 
Financing Transactions
 
The following tables set forth the types of assets securing the financing transactions in our portfolio:

 
 
December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
Asset Type
 
Net Carrying Value
 
Percentage of Total Net Carrying Value
 
Net Carrying Value
 
Percentage of Total Net Carrying Value
Seismic testing equipment
 
$
3,463,004

 
54%
 
$
6,565,745

 
71%
Lubricant manufacturing and blending equipment
 
2,418,267

 
37%
 

 
Vessel - motor cargo
 
581,069

 
9%
 

 
Trailers
 

 
 
2,618,465

 
29%
 
 
$
6,462,340

 
100%
 
$
9,184,210

 
100%

The net carrying value of our financing transactions includes the balance of our net investment in notes receivable and our net investment in finance lease as of each reporting date.

During 2016 and 2015, certain customers generated significant portions (defined as 10% or more) of our total finance income as follows:
 
 
 
 
 
Percentage of Total Finance Income
Customer
 
Asset Type
 
2016
 
2015
Geokinetics, Inc.
 
Seismic testing equipment
 
85%
 
79%
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.
 
Trailers
 
14%
 
21%
 
 
 
 
99%
 
100%

Interest income and prepayment fees from our net investment in notes receivable and finance income from our net investment in finance lease are included in finance income in our consolidated statements of operations.
 
Revenue and other income for 2016 and 2015 is summarized as follows:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
Change
Finance income
 
$
620,224

 
$
1,083,420

 
$
(463,196
)
Income from investment in joint ventures
 
862,801

 
691,143

 
171,658

Gain on sale of investment in joint ventures
 
19,566

 

 
19,566

Other income
 
6,581

 

 
6,581

   Total revenue and other income
 
$
1,509,172

 
$
1,774,563

 
$
(265,391
)
 

17


Total revenue and other income for 2016 decreased $265,391, or 15.0%, as compared to 2015. The decrease in finance income was primarily due to (i) a decrease of $324,238 in income from our lease with Geokinetics as a result of damage to certain assets subject to such lease primarily in 2015, which accelerated income recognition related to such assets, and the declining nature of recognizing income using the effective interest rate method and (ii) the prepayment of the secured term loan by Premier Trailer in August 2016. This decrease was partially offset by (a) an increase in income from investment in joint ventures primarily as a result of entering into new joint ventures during or subsequent to 2015, partially offset by exiting our joint venture investment related to Murray during 2015 and (b) a gain on sale of investment in joint ventures recorded during 2016 as a result of the sale of our interests in the joint ventures related to Challenge.

Expenses for 2016 and 2015 are summarized as follows:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
Change
Management fees
 
$
198,086

 
$
163,589

 
$
34,497

Administrative expense reimbursements
 
492,784

 
524,606

 
(31,822
)
General and administrative
 
527,744

 
375,925

 
151,819

Interest
 
31,650

 
29,544

 
2,106

   Total expenses
 
$
1,250,264

 
$
1,093,664

 
$
156,600


Total expenses for 2016 increased $156,600, or 14.3%, as compared to 2015. The increase was primarily due to increases in (i) general and administrative expenses due to higher bank, audit and legal fees recorded during 2016, partially offset by lower state tax expenses and a higher withholding tax refund receivable in 2016 and (ii) management fees due to prepayments of a certain finance lease and a note receivable and the addition of a new investment during 2016. These increases were offset by a decrease in administrative expense reimbursements due to lower costs incurred on our behalf by our Investment Manager during 2016 as compared to 2015.
 
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests decreased $142,714, from $393,440 in 2015 to $250,726 in 2016. The decrease was a result of a decrease in net income generated by our lease related to Geokinetics during 2016 as compared to 2015.
 
Net Income Attributable to Fund Sixteen
 
As a result of the foregoing factors, net income attributable to us for 2016 and 2015 was $8,182 and $287,459, respectively. Net income attributable to us per weighted average additional Class A share and Class I share outstanding for 2016 was $0.44 and $1.24, respectively. Net income attributable to us per weighted average additional Class A share and Class I share outstanding for 2015 was $16.15 and $17.11, respectively.
 
Financial Condition
 
This section discusses the major balance sheet variances at December 31, 2016 compared to December 31, 2015.
 
Total Assets 
Total assets decreased $4,289,219, from $19,122,189 at December 31, 2015 to $14,832,970 at December 31, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to the use of existing cash, cash generated by and returned from our investments, and from the sale of our interests in certain joint ventures being partially used to (i) pay distributions to our shareholders and noncontrolling interests, (ii) repay the total amount outstanding on our Facility (as defined elsewhere in this Item 7) and (iii) repay certain of our related party payable, each during 2016.
 
Total Liabilities 
Total liabilities decreased $1,889,787, from $2,625,490 at December 31, 2015 to $735,703 at December 31, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to the repayment of the total amount outstanding on our Facility and certain of our related party payable during 2016.



 

18


Equity 
Equity decreased $2,399,432, from $16,496,699 at December 31, 2015 to $14,097,267 at December 31, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to distributions to our shareholders and noncontrolling interests.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources

Summary
 
At December 31, 2016 and 2015, we had cash of $4,925,909 and $1,672,868, respectively. Pursuant to the terms of our offering, we have established a cash reserve in the amount of 0.50% of the gross offering proceeds from the sale of our Shares. As of December 31, 2016, the cash reserve was $87,348. During our operating period, which commenced on January 1, 2015, our main source of cash is typically from operating activities and our main use of cash is in investing and financing activities. Our liquidity will vary in the future, increasing to the extent cash flows from investments and proceeds from the sale of our investments exceed expenses and decreasing as we make new investments, pay distributions to our shareholders and noncontrolling interests and to the extent that expenses exceed cash flows from operations and proceeds from the sale of our investments.
 
We believe that cash generated from the expected results of our operations will be sufficient to finance our liquidity requirements for the foreseeable future.
  
However, our equipment financing business has encountered significant challenges over the past several years. Specifically, we continue to suffer from (i) a lack of significant capital raised in order to execute on our investment objectives; and (ii) increasing competition over the last few years from larger alternative lenders that had not historically competed with us for investment opportunities. These challenges, along with the increasing costs associated with managing a public equipment fund, have made it increasingly difficult for us to operate in the same manner that we have operated under since inception. Accordingly, our Investment Manager is exploring certain alternatives in order to maximize returns.

Our ability to generate cash in the future is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, regulatory and other factors that affect us and our borrowers’ and lessees’ businesses that are beyond our control. 

We have used the net proceeds of our offering and the cash generated from our investments to invest in Capital Assets located in North America and other developed markets, including those in Asia and elsewhere. We have sought and continue to seek to acquire a portfolio of Capital Assets that is comprised of transactions that generate (a) current cash flow from payments of principal and/or interest (in the case of secured loans and other financing transactions) and rental payments (in the case of leases), (b) deferred cash flow by realizing the value of Capital Assets or interests therein at the maturity of the investment, or (c) a combination of both from other structured investments.
 
Unanticipated or greater than anticipated operating costs or losses (including a borrower’s inability to make timely loan payments or a lessee’s inability to make timely lease payments) would adversely affect our liquidity. To the extent that working capital may be insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements, we anticipate that we would fund our operations from cash flow generated by investing and financing activities. At December 31, 2016, we had $1,073,827 available under a revolving line of credit pursuant to the borrowing base to fund our short-term liquidity needs. For additional information, see “Financings and Borrowings – Revolving Line of Credit, Recourse” below and Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements. Our Managing Owner does not intend to fund any cash flow deficit of ours or provide other financial assistance to us.

Cash Flows              
 
The following table sets forth summary cash flow data:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
Net cash (used in) provided by:
 
 
 
 
  Operating activities
 
$
(19,204
)
 
$
(58,501
)
  Investing activities
 
7,533,233

 
(708,882
)
  Financing activities
 
(4,260,988
)
 
(1,808,823
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash
 
$
3,253,041

 
$
(2,576,206
)




19


Operating Activities 
 
Cash used in operating activities decreased $39,297, from $58,501 in 2015 to $19,204 in 2016. The decrease was primarily due to (i) less cash being used to repay the amount due to our Investment Manager during 2016 as a result of the timing of the payments of and the reduction in expenses incurred on our behalf by our Investment Manager and (ii) the recording of a certain estimated tax receivable during 2015, of which a portion was collected in 2016, partially offset by less cash receipts from our operating income in 2016 as compared to 2015.

Investing Activities    
 
Cash flows from investing activities increased $8,242,115, from a use of cash of $708,882 in 2015 to a source of cash of $7,533,233 in 2016. The increase was primarily due to (i) proceeds from the sale of our interests in the joint ventures related to Challenge in 2016, (ii) less cash being used to make new investments in 2016 as compared to 2015 and (iii) principal received on notes receivable due to the prepayment by Premier Trailer in 2016, partially offset by a decrease in distributions from our joint ventures in excess of profits during 2016 as compared to 2015.
 
Financing Activities   
 
Cash used in financing activities increased $2,452,165, from $1,808,823 in 2015 to $4,260,988 in 2016. The increase was primarily due to the repayment of the total amount outstanding on our Facility during 2016, which we drew down in 2015, partially offset by a decrease in distributions paid to our shareholders and noncontrolling interests.
 
Financings and Borrowings
 
Revolving Line of Credit, Recourse
 
We have an agreement with CB&T for a revolving line of credit through May 30, 2017 of up to $5,000,000 (the “Facility”), which is secured by all of our assets not subject to a first priority lien. Amounts available under the Facility are subject to a borrowing base that is determined, subject to certain limitations, by the present value of the future receivables under certain loans and lease agreements in which we have a beneficial interest. 
 
The interest rate for general advances under the Facility is CB&T’s prime rate. We may elect to designate up to five advances on the outstanding principal balance of the Facility to bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.5% per year. In all instances, borrowings under the Facility are subject to an interest rate floor of 4.0% per year. In addition, we are obligated to pay an annualized 0.5% fee on unused commitments under the Facility. As of December 31, 2015, we had $1,500,000 outstanding under the Facility. On February 9, 2016 and March 29, 2016, we repaid $1,000,000 and $500,000, respectively, of the outstanding balance under the Facility. At December 31, 2016, there were no obligations outstanding under the Facility and we were in compliance with the covenants related to the Facility.
 
At December 31, 2016, we had $1,073,827 available under the Facility pursuant to the borrowing base.  
 
Distributions
 
We paid monthly distributions to our shareholders beginning with the first month after each such shareholder’s admission through December 31, 2016. The payment of distributions remains subject to change and are made at our Managing Owner's discretion, with the amount and timing of such distributions based on our overall performance. During 2016, we paid distributions to our Managing Owner, Class A additional shareholders and Class I shareholders of $10,669, $1,031,649 and $24,605, respectively. During 2015, we paid distributions to our Managing Owner, Class A additional shareholders and Class I shareholders of $14,182, $1,371,102 and $32,794, respectively. We also paid distributions to our noncontrolling interests of $1,591,417 and $1,854,443 in 2016 and 2015, respectively.
  








20


Commitments and Contingencies and Off-Balance Sheet Transactions
 
Commitments and Contingencies
 
At the time we acquire or divest of our interest in Capital Assets, we may, under very limited circumstances, agree to indemnify the seller or buyer for specific contingent liabilities. Our Managing Owner believes that any liability of ours that may arise as a result of any such indemnification obligations may or may not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations taken as a whole. We are a party to the Facility, as discussed in “Financings and Borrowings – Revolving Line of Credit, Recourse” above. We had no borrowings under the Facility at December 31, 2016.

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

None.

Inflation and Interest Rates
 
The potential effects of inflation on us are difficult to predict. If the general economy experiences significant rates of inflation, however, it could affect us in a number of ways. We do not currently have or expect to have rent escalation clauses tied to inflation in our leases and we expect most of our notes receivable to contain fixed interest rates. The anticipated residual values to be realized upon the sale or re-lease of equipment upon lease termination (and thus the overall cash flow from our leases) may increase with inflation as the cost of similar new and used equipment increases.
 
If interest rates increase or decrease significantly, our leases and notes receivable already in place would generally not be affected.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this item.


21


Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
 

 

22


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
The Shareholders
ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ICON ECI Fund Sixteen (the “Fund”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2016. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of ICON ECI Fund Sixteen at December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
 
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
New York, New York
March 28, 2017


23


ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
(A Delaware Statutory Trust)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
December 31,
 
2016
 
2015
Assets
Cash
$
4,925,909

 
$
1,672,868

Net investment in notes receivable
2,999,336

 
2,618,465

Net investment in finance lease
3,463,004

 
6,565,745

Investment in joint ventures
3,341,725

 
8,164,949

Other assets
102,996

 
100,162

Total assets
$
14,832,970

 
$
19,122,189

Liabilities and Equity 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
Due to Investment Manager and affiliates, net
$
169,137

 
$
553,021

Revolving line of credit, recourse

 
1,500,000

Accrued expenses and other liabilities
566,566

 
572,469

Total liabilities
735,703

 
2,625,490

 
 
 
 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)

 

 
 
 
 
Equity:
 
 
 
Shareholders' capital
 
 
 
Class A
12,004,381

 
13,039,024

Class I
288,747

 
312,845

Total shareholders' capital
12,293,128

 
13,351,869

Noncontrolling interests
1,804,139

 
3,144,830

Total equity
14,097,267

 
16,496,699

Total liabilities and equity
$
14,832,970

 
$
19,122,189


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


24


ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
(A Delaware Statutory Trust)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2016
 
2015
Revenue and other income:
 
 
 
Finance income
$
620,224

 
$
1,083,420

Income from investment in joint ventures
862,801

 
691,143

Gain on sale of investment in joint ventures
19,566

 

Other income
6,581

 

Total revenue and other income
1,509,172

 
1,774,563

 
 
 
 
Expenses:
 

 
 

Management fees
198,086

 
163,589

Administrative expense reimbursements
492,784

 
524,606

General and administrative
527,744

 
375,925

Interest
31,650

 
29,544

Total expenses
1,250,264

 
1,093,664

Net income
258,908

 
680,899

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
250,726

 
393,440

Net income attributable to Fund Sixteen
$
8,182

 
$
287,459

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to Fund Sixteen allocable to:
 
 
 
Additional Class A shareholders and Class I shareholders
$
8,100

 
$
284,584

Managing Owner
82

 
2,875

 
$
8,182

 
$
287,459

 
 
 
 
Additional Class A shares:
 
 
 
Net income attributable to Fund Sixteen allocable to additional Class A shareholders
$
7,593

 
$
277,568

Weighted average number of additional Class A shares outstanding
17,189

 
17,189

Net income attributable to Fund Sixteen per weighted average additional Class A share
$
0.44

 
$
16.15

 
 
 
 
Class I shares:
 
 
 
Net income attributable to Fund Sixteen allocable to Class I shareholders
$
507

 
$
7,016

Weighted average number of Class I shares outstanding
410

 
410

Net income attributable to Fund Sixteen per weighted average Class I share
$
1.24

 
$
17.11


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.   


25


ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
(A Delaware Statutory Trust)
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
 
Class A
 
Class I
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Managing Owner
 
Additional Shareholders
 
Total Class A
 
Shareholders
 
 
 
Total
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Noncontrolling Interests
 
Shares
 
Amount
Balance, December 31, 2014
0.001

 
$
(12,729
)
 
17,189

 
$
14,156,594

 
17,189

 
$
14,143,865

 
410

 
$
338,623

 
$
4,588,670

 
17,599

 
$
19,071,158

Net income

 
2,875

 

 
277,568

 

 
280,443

 

 
7,016

 
393,440

 

 
680,899

Distributions

 
(14,182
)
 

 
(1,371,102
)
 

 
(1,385,284
)
 

 
(32,794
)
 
(1,854,443
)
 

 
(3,272,521
)
Investment by noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
17,163

 

 
17,163

Balance, December 31, 2015
0.001

 
(24,036
)
 
17,189

 
13,063,060

 
17,189

 
13,039,024

 
410

 
312,845

 
3,144,830

 
17,599

 
16,496,699

Net income

 
82

 

 
7,593

 

 
7,675

 

 
507

 
250,726

 

 
258,908

Distributions

 
(10,669
)
 

 
(1,031,649
)
 

 
(1,042,318
)
 

 
(24,605
)
 
(1,591,417
)
 

 
(2,658,340
)
Balance, December 31, 2016
0.001

 
$
(34,623
)
 
17,189

 
$
12,039,004

 
17,189

 
$
12,004,381

 
410

 
$
288,747

 
$
1,804,139

 
17,599

 
$
14,097,267


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


26


ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
(A Delaware Statutory Trust)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2016
 
2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
Net income
$
258,908

 
$
680,899

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
 
 
 
Finance income
196,037

 
95,522

Income from investment in joint ventures
(860,966
)
 
(691,143
)
Gain on sale of investment in joint ventures
(19,566
)
 

Interest expense from amortization of debt financing costs
8,792

 
10,315

Interest expense, other
13,476

 
16,729

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
Other assets
(11,626
)
 
(94,962
)
Due to Investment Manager and affiliates, net
(381,849
)
 
(789,995
)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
81,234

 
26,833

Distributions from joint ventures
696,356

 
687,301

Net cash used in operating activities
(19,204
)
 
(58,501
)
Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
Proceeds from sale of investment in joint ventures
3,788,373

 

Investment in notes receivable
(2,998,960
)
 

Principal received on notes receivable
2,500,000

 

Principal received on finance lease
3,024,793

 
2,958,240

Investment in joint ventures

 
(6,001,327
)
Distributions received from joint ventures in excess of profits
1,219,027

 
2,334,205

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
7,533,233

 
(708,882
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
Repayment of revolving line of credit, recourse
(1,500,000
)
 

Sales and offering expenses paid
(102,648
)
 
(53,465
)
Proceeds from revolving line of credit, recourse

 
1,500,000

Investment by noncontrolling interests

 
17,163

Distributions to noncontrolling interests
(1,591,417
)
 
(1,854,443
)
Distributions to shareholders
(1,066,923
)
 
(1,418,078
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(4,260,988
)
 
(1,808,823
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash
3,253,041

 
(2,576,206
)
Cash, beginning of year
1,672,868

 
4,249,074

Cash, end of year
$
4,925,909

 
$
1,672,868

 
 
 
 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
 
 
 
Acquisition fee payable to Investment Manager
$

 
$
399,865


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


27

ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
  (A Delaware Statutory Trust) 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2016



(1)   Organization
 
ICON ECI Fund Sixteen (the “Fund”) was formed on October 11, 2012 as a Delaware statutory trust. When used in these notes to consolidated financial statements, the terms “we,” “us,” “our” or similar terms refer to the Fund and its consolidated subsidiaries.
 
We are a direct financing fund that primarily makes investments in or that are collateralized by equipment and other corporate infrastructure (collectively, “Capital Assets”). The investments are in companies that utilize Capital Assets to operate their businesses. These investments are primarily structured as debt and debt-like financings such as loans, leases and other structured financing transactions in or that are collateralized by Capital Assets that ICON MT 16, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and our managing owner (the “Managing Owner”), believes will provide us with a satisfactory, risk-adjusted rate of return. Our Managing Owner makes investment decisions on our behalf and manages our business.
 
Our investment objectives are to preserve investors’ capital, provide distributions and provide a favorable total return. To meet our investment objectives, we have used the net proceeds from our offering and the cash generated from our investments to originate or acquire a diverse pool of investments described above, as well as other strategic investments collateralized by Capital Assets. ICON Capital, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and our affiliate, is our investment manager (the “Investment Manager”). Our Investment Manager originates and services our investments. Wilmington Trust, National Association (the “Trustee”) serves as our sole trustee pursuant to our Third Amended and Restated Trust Agreement (the “Trust Agreement”). The Trustee delegated to our Managing Owner all of the power and authority to manage our business and affairs and has only nominal duties and liabilities to us.
 
Our offering period commenced on July 1, 2013 and ended on December 31, 2014. Our Managing Owner determined to cease our offering period earlier than originally anticipated as a result of lower than expected offering proceeds being raised. Our operating period commenced on January 1, 2015. We offered to sell to the public any combination of two classes of shares, Class A shares and Class I shares (collectively, the “Shares”), on a “best efforts” basis with the intention of raising up to $250,000,000 of capital, of which $9,000,000 had been reserved for issuance pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan (the “DRIP”). Other than differing allocable fees and expenses, Class A shares and Class I shares have identical rights and privileges, such as identical voting and distribution rights.
 
As of November 12, 2013 (the “Initial Closing Date”), we raised a minimum of $1,200,000 from the sale of our Shares, at which time shareholders were admitted and we commenced operations. As of June 13, 2014, we raised the $12,500,000 minimum offering amount for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Subsequent to the Initial Closing Date, we returned the initial capital contribution of $1,000 to CION Investment Group, LLC (formerly, ICON Investment Group, LLC) (the “Initial Shareholder”). From the commencement of our offering on July 1, 2013 through December 31, 2014, we sold 17,189 Class A shares to 351 Class A shareholders and 410 Class I shares to six Class I shareholders, of which 404 Class A shares and 12 Class I shares were issued pursuant to the DRIP, representing an aggregate of $17,469,610 of capital contributions. From the Initial Closing Date through December 31, 2014, we incurred sales commissions to third parties of $1,198,531 and dealer-manager and distribution fees of $347,547 to CION Securities, LLC, the dealer-manager of our offering and an affiliate of our Investment Manager (“CION Securities”). In addition, organization costs of $8,418 and offering expenses of $161,422 were incurred by us during such period. Organization costs were expensed when incurred and offering expenses were recorded as a reduction of shareholders’ equity.
 
(2)   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
 
Our accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). In the opinion of our Managing Owner, all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
 



28

ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
  (A Delaware Statutory Trust) 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2016


The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of our majority-owned subsidiaries and other controlled entities. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.  In joint ventures where we have a controlling financial interest, the financial condition and results of operations of the joint venture are consolidated. Noncontrolling interest represents the minority owner’s proportionate share of its equity in the joint venture. The noncontrolling interest is adjusted for the minority owner’s share of the earnings, losses, investments and distributions of the joint venture.
 
We account for our noncontrolling interests in joint ventures where we have influence over financial and operational matters, generally 50% or less ownership interest, under the equity method of accounting. In such cases, our original investments are recorded at cost and adjusted for our share of earnings, losses and distributions. We account for investments in joint ventures where we have virtually no influence over financial and operational matters using the cost method of accounting. In such cases, our original investments are recorded at cost and any distributions received are recorded as revenue. All of our investments in joint ventures are subject to our impairment review policy.
 
We report noncontrolling interests as a separate component of consolidated equity and net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests is included in consolidated net income. The attribution of net income between controlling and noncontrolling interests is disclosed on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
 
Net income attributable to us per weighted average additional Class A share and Class I share outstanding is based upon the weighted average number of additional Class A shares and Class I shares outstanding during the year.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in banks and highly liquid investments with original maturity dates of three months or less. 
 
Our cash and cash equivalents are held principally at one financial institution and at times may exceed insured limits.  We have placed these funds in a high quality institution in order to minimize risk relating to exceeding insured limits.
 
Organization Costs
 
Organization costs included, among other things, the cost of organizing us as a Delaware statutory trust, including the cost of legal services and other fees pertaining to our organization. All organization costs were funded by our Investment Manager and its affiliates and there was no liability for organization costs to us until we met the minimum offering requirement on November 12, 2013. Organization costs were expensed when incurred, subject to the terms of the Trust Agreement.
 
Offering Costs
 
Offering costs included, among other things, legal fees and other costs pertaining to the preparation of our registration statement in connection with the public offering of our Shares. All offering costs were funded by our Investment Manager and its affiliates and there was no liability for offering costs to us until we met the minimum offering requirement on November 12, 2013. Offering costs were charged directly to shareholders’ equity as offering proceeds were raised, subject to the terms of the Trust Agreement.
 












29

ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
  (A Delaware Statutory Trust) 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2016


Upfront Sales Commissions and Sales Commission Trail
 
We paid upfront sales commissions on Class A shares sold in the offering of up to 5.0% of gross offering proceeds from the sale of such Class A shares. We also pay an annual sales commission trail of 0.75% of offering proceeds from the sale of our Class A shares (net of dealer-manager fees and upfront sales commissions), payable quarterly commencing on the 13th month following acceptance of the subscription for such Class A shares. We will continue to pay the sales commission trail with respect to Class A shares until the earlier to occur of: (i) total sales commissions and dealer-manager fees paid with respect to the Class A shares following the completion of the offering equaling 10% of the gross proceeds received with respect to the issuance of such shares from the primary portion of the offering, (ii) such shares are repurchased or transferred or (iii) our entry into our wind down period. The upfront sales commissions and the sales commission trail were charged directly to shareholders’ equity upon acceptance of the subscription. As the sales commission trail is expected to be paid over a period of approximately four years, we recorded the sales commission trail at its present value upon acceptance of the subscription with a corresponding commission payable included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. Interest expense accreted with respect to the commission payable was allocated only to Class A shares.  
 
Net Income Per Share
 
Our capital structure consists of only common shares outstanding. As a result, net income per share, as presented, represents both basic and fully diluted for the period presented in the consolidated financial statements. We calculate net income per share using the two-class method to reflect the different classes of our Shares. Net income per additional Class A share and Class I share is calculated by dividing the net income attributable to additional Class A shareholders and Class I shareholders by the respective weighted-average number of shares issued and outstanding during the presented periods. The net income allocation for the Class I shares excludes interest expense of $13,476 and $16,729 related to the sales commission trail during 2016 and 2015, respectively, which is only applicable to the Class A shareholders.
 
Distribution Fee
 
We pay an annual distribution fee equal to 0.55% of gross offering proceeds from Class I shares sold in the offering. We will continue to pay the distribution fee with respect to Class I shares until the earlier to occur of: (i) total distribution fees paid with respect to the Class I shares following the completion of the offering equaling 10% of gross proceeds received with respect to the issuance of such shares from the primary portion of the offering or (ii) our entry into our wind down period. The distribution fee is payable monthly. As we estimated the distribution fee is to be paid over a period of approximately seven years before we enter into our wind down period, we recorded the distribution fee upon acceptance of the subscription with a corresponding distribution fee payable included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets.
 
Debt Financing Costs     
 
Debt financing costs associated with a line of credit arrangement are capitalized and included as other assets. Such costs are amortized to interest expense over the term of the debt instrument using the effective interest rate method.
 
Asset Impairments
 
The significant assets in our portfolio are periodically reviewed, no less frequently than annually or when indicators of impairment exist, to determine whether events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss will be recognized only if the carrying value of a long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair market value. If there is an indication of impairment, we will estimate the future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) expected from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Future cash flows are the future cash inflows expected to be generated by an asset less the future outflows expected to be necessary to obtain those inflows. If an impairment is determined to exist, the impairment loss will be measured as the amount by which the carrying value of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value and recorded in our consolidated statements of operations in the period the determination is made.
 

30

ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
  (A Delaware Statutory Trust) 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2016


The events or changes in circumstances that generally indicate that an asset may be impaired are (i) the estimated fair value of the underlying asset is less than its carrying value or (ii) the lessee is experiencing financial difficulties and it does not appear likely that the estimated proceeds from the disposition of the asset will be sufficient to satisfy the residual position in the asset. The preparation of the undiscounted cash flows requires the use of assumptions and estimates, including the level of future rents, the residual value expected to be realized upon disposition of the asset, estimated downtime between re-leasing events and the amount of re-leasing costs. Our Investment Manager’s review for impairment includes a consideration of the existence of impairment indicators including third-party appraisals, published values for similar assets, recent transactions for similar assets, adverse changes in market conditions for specific asset types and the occurrence of significant adverse changes in general industry and market conditions that could affect the fair value of the asset.
 
Lease Classification and Revenue Recognition

Each equipment lease we enter into is classified as either a finance lease or an operating lease, based upon the terms of each lease. The estimated residual value is a critical component of and can directly influence the determination as to whether a lease is classified as an operating lease or a finance lease.
 
Our Investment Manager has an investment committee that approves each new equipment lease and other financing transaction. As part of its process, the investment committee determines the estimated residual value, if any, to be used once the investment has been approved.  The factors considered in determining the estimated residual value include, but are not limited to, the creditworthiness of the potential lessee, the type of equipment considered, how the equipment is integrated into the potential lessee’s business, the length of the lease and the industry in which the potential lessee operates. Residual values are reviewed for impairment in accordance with our impairment review policy.

The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the marketplace are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. The residual value is calculated using information from various external sources, such as trade publications, auction data, equipment dealers, wholesalers and industry experts, as well as inspection of the physical asset and other economic indicators.

For finance leases, we capitalize, at lease inception, the total minimum lease payments receivable from the lessee, the estimated unguaranteed residual value of the equipment at lease termination and the initial direct costs related to the lease, less unearned income. Unearned income represents the difference between the sum of the minimum lease payments receivable, plus the estimated unguaranteed residual value, minus the cost of the leased equipment. Unearned income is recognized as finance income over the term of the lease using the effective interest rate method.
 
For operating leases, rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.  Billed operating lease receivables are included in accounts receivable until collected or written off. We record a reserve if we deem any receivable not collectible. The difference between the timing of the cash received and the income recognized on a straight-line basis is recognized as either deferred revenue or other assets, as appropriate. Initial direct costs are capitalized as a component of the cost of the equipment and depreciated over the lease term.
 
Notes Receivable and Revenue Recognition
 
Notes receivable are reported in our consolidated balance sheets at the outstanding principal balance, plus costs incurred to originate the loans, net of any unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans. We use the effective interest rate method to recognize finance income, which produces a constant periodic rate of return on the investment. Unearned income, discounts and premiums are amortized to finance income in our consolidated statements of operations using the effective interest rate method. Interest receivable related to the unpaid principal is recorded separately from the outstanding balance in our consolidated balance sheets. Upon the prepayment of a note receivable, any prepayment penalties and unamortized loan origination, closing and commitment fees are recorded as part of finance income in our consolidated statements of operations. Our notes receivable may contain a paid-in-kind (“PIK”) interest provision. Any PIK interest, if deemed collectible, will be added to the principal balance of the note receivable and is recorded as income.
 



31

ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
  (A Delaware Statutory Trust) 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2016


Credit Quality of Notes Receivable and Finance Leases and Credit Loss Reserve
 
Our Investment Manager monitors the ongoing credit quality of our financing receivables by (i) reviewing and analyzing a borrower’s financial performance on a regular basis, including review of financial statements received on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis as prescribed in the loan or lease agreement, (ii) tracking the relevant credit metrics of each financing receivable and a borrower’s compliance with financial and non-financial covenants, (iii) monitoring a borrower’s payment history and public credit rating, if available, and (iv) assessing our exposure based on the current investment mix. As part of the monitoring process, our Investment Manager may physically inspect the collateral or a borrower’s facility and meet with a borrower’s management to better understand such borrower’s financial performance and its future plans on an as-needed basis. 
 
As our financing receivables, generally notes receivable and finance leases, are limited in number, our Investment Manager is able to estimate the credit loss reserve based on a detailed analysis of each financing receivable as opposed to using portfolio-based metrics. Our Investment Manager does not use a system of assigning internal risk ratings to each of our financing receivables. Rather, each financing receivable is analyzed quarterly and categorized as either performing or non-performing based on certain factors including, but not limited to, financial results, satisfying scheduled payments and compliance with financial covenants. A financing receivable is usually categorized as non-performing only when a borrower experiences financial difficulties and has failed to make scheduled payments. Our Investment Manager then analyzes whether the financing receivable should be placed on a non-accrual status, a credit loss reserve should be established or the financing receivable should be restructured. As part of the assessment, updated collateral value is usually considered and such collateral value can be based on a third party industry expert appraisal or, depending on the type of collateral and accessibility to relevant published guides or market sales data, internally derived fair value. Material events would be specifically disclosed in the discussion of each financing receivable held. 
 
Financing receivables are generally placed on a non-accrual status when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, our Investment Manager periodically reviews the creditworthiness of companies with payments outstanding less than 90 days and based upon our Investment Manager’s judgment, these accounts may be placed on a non-accrual status.
 
In accordance with the cost recovery method, payments received on non-accrual financing receivables are applied to principal if there is doubt regarding the ultimate collectability of principal. If collection of the principal of non-accrual financing receivables is not in doubt, interest income is recognized on a cash basis. Financing receivables on non-accrual status may not be restored to accrual status until all delinquent payments have been received, and we believe recovery of the remaining unpaid receivable is probable.
 
When our Investment Manager deems it is probable that we will not be able to collect all contractual principal and interest on a non-performing financing receivable, we perform an analysis to determine if a credit loss reserve is necessary. This analysis considers the estimated cash flows from the financing receivable, and/or the collateral value of the asset underlying the financing receivable when financing receivable repayment is collateral dependent. If it is determined that the impaired value of the non-performing financing receivable is less than the net carrying value, we will recognize a credit loss reserve or adjust the existing credit loss reserve with a corresponding charge to earnings.  We then charge off a financing receivable in the period that it is deemed uncollectible by reducing the credit loss reserve and the balance of the financing receivable.
 
Initial Direct Costs
 
We capitalize initial direct costs, including acquisition fees, associated with the origination and funding of leased assets and other financing transactions. We pay acquisition fees to our Investment Manager of up to 2.5% of the purchase price of the investment made in Capital Assets by or on our behalf, including, but not limited to, the cash paid, indebtedness incurred or assumed, and the excess of the collateral value of the Capital Assets over the amount of the investment, if any. The costs of each transaction are amortized over the transaction term using the straight-line method for operating leases and the effective interest rate method for finance leases and notes receivable in our consolidated statements of operations. Costs related to leases or other financing transactions that are not consummated are expensed in our consolidated statements of operations.
 

32

ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
  (A Delaware Statutory Trust) 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2016



Income Taxes
 
We are taxed as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes. Therefore, no provision for federal and state income taxes has been recorded since the liability for such taxes is the responsibility of each of the individual shareholders rather than our business as a whole. We are potentially subject to New York City unincorporated business tax (“UBT”), which is imposed on unincorporated trade or business operating in New York City. The UBT is imposed for each taxable year at a rate of 4% of taxable income allocated to New York City. Our federal, state and local income tax returns for tax years for which the applicable statutes of limitations have not expired are subject to examination by the applicable taxing authorities. All penalties and interest, if any, associated with income taxes are included in general and administrative expense in our consolidated statements of operations. Conclusions regarding tax positions are subject to review and may be adjusted at a later date based on factors including, but not limited to, on-going analyses of tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof. We did not have any material liabilities recorded related to uncertain tax positions nor did we have any unrecognized tax benefits as of the periods presented herein.
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires our Managing Owner to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates primarily include the determination of credit loss reserves, impairment losses and residual values. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
  
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern: Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”), which provides guidance about management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. We adopted ASU 2014-15 on December 31, 2016, which did not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01, Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items: Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items (“ASU 2015-01”), which simplifies income statement presentation by eliminating the concept of extraordinary items. We adopted ASU 2015-01 on January 1, 2016, which did not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, Consolidation - Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis (“ASU 2015-02”), which modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities or voting interest entities, eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership, and affects the consolidation analysis by reducing the frequency of application of related party guidance and excluding certain fees in the primary beneficiary determination. We adopted ASU 2015-02 on January 1, 2016, which did not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (“ASU 2015-03”), which requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of such debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. In August 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, Interest - Imputation of Interest: Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements (“ASU 2015-15”), which further specifies the SEC staff’s view on the presentation and subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs associated with line of credit arrangements. We adopted ASU 2015-03 on January 1, 2016, which did not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements. In addition, we adopted ASU 2015-15 on January 1, 2016 and continue to present debt issuance costs associated with our revolving line of credit as other assets on our consolidated balance sheets.



33

ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
  (A Delaware Statutory Trust) 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2016



Other Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), requiring revenue to be recognized in an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received in exchange for goods and services. This new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented, or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. In August 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers - Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU 2015-14”), which defers implementation of ASU 2014-09 by one year. Under such deferral, the adoption of ASU 2014-09 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted, but not before our original effective date of January 1, 2017. Our evaluation of the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 on our consolidated financial statements is ongoing and our implementation efforts have included the identification of revenue within the scope of the guidance and the evaluation of applicable revenue contracts. We continue to evaluate the timing of recognition of various revenue; however, since a substantial portion of our revenue is recognized from our leasing contracts, which is subject to ASU 2016-02 (as defined below), such revenue is excluded from our evaluation of ASU 2014-09.

In January 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”), which provides guidance related to accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, FASB clarified guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. The adoption of ASU 2016-01 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-01 on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”), which requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms greater than twelve months on the balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 implements changes to lessor accounting focused on conforming with certain changes made to lessee accounting and the recently released revenue recognition guidance. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-07, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures: Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting (“ASU 2016-07”), which eliminates the retroactive adjustments to an investment upon it qualifying for the equity method of accounting as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence by the investor. ASU 2016-07 requires that the equity method investor add the cost of acquiring the additional interest in the investee to the current basis of the investor’s previously held interest and adopt the equity method of accounting as of the date the investment qualifies for equity method accounting. The adoption of ASU 2016-07 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2016-07 is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (“ASU 2016-13”), which modifies the measurement of credit losses by eliminating the probable initial recognition threshold set forth in current guidance, and instead reflects an entity’s current estimate of all expected credit losses. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. An entity will apply the amendments within ASU 2016-13 through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The adoption of ASU 2016-13 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2020, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-13 on our consolidated financial statements.






34

ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
  (A Delaware Statutory Trust) 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2016


In August 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”), which provides guidance on how certain cash receipts and cash payments are to be presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. An entity will apply the amendments within ASU 2016-15 using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-15 on our consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-17, Consolidation (“ASU 2016-17”), which amends the consolidation guidance on how a reporting entity that is the single decision maker of a variable interest entity should treat indirect interests in such entity held by related parties that are under common control with the reporting entity when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of that variable interest entity. Under ASU 2016-17, a single decision maker is not required to consider indirect interests held by related parties that are under common control with the single decision maker to be the equivalent of direct interests in their entirety. The adoption of ASU 2016-17 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. As a result of our adoption of ASU 2015-02 on January 1, 2016, we are required to apply the amendments within ASU 2016-17 retrospectively to when we initially applied the amendments within ASU 2015-02. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-17 on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (“ASU 2016-18”), which provides guidance on the presentation of restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. The adoption of ASU 2016-18 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. An entity will apply the amendments within ASU 2016-18 using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-18 on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (“ASU 2017-01”), which clarifies the definition of a business. ASU 2017-01 sets forth requirements to be met for a set to be deemed a business and establishes a practical way to determine when a set is not a business. To be considered a business, a set must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create an output, and removes the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace missing elements. In addition, ASU 2017-01 narrows the definition of outputs and aligns such definition with how outputs are described within the revenue guidance. The adoption of ASU 2017-01 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted for transactions that occur before the issuance date or effective date of ASU 2017-01 to the extent that such transactions have not been reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2017-01 on our consolidated financial statements.

(3)   Net Investment in Notes Receivable
 
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, we had no net investment in notes receivable on non-accrual status and no net investment in notes receivable that was past due 90 days or more and still accruing.
 
Net investment in notes receivable consisted of the following:
 
December 31,
 
2016
 
2015
Principal outstanding
$
3,192,000

 
$
2,500,000

Initial direct costs

 
157,881

Deferred fees
(192,664
)
 
(39,416
)
Net investment in notes receivable
$
2,999,336

 
$
2,618,465


On September 24, 2014, we, ICON Leasing Fund Twelve Liquidating Trust (formerly, ICON Leasing Fund Twelve, LLC) (“Fund Twelve”), ICON Equipment and Corporate Infrastructure Fund Fourteen, L.P. (“Fund Fourteen”) and ICON ECI Fund Fifteen, L.P. (“Fund Fifteen”), each an entity also managed by our Investment Manager, entered into a secured term loan credit facility agreement with Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc. (“Premier Trailer”) to provide a credit facility of up to $20,000,000, of which our commitment of $2,500,000 was funded on such date. The loan bore interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), subject to a 1% floor, plus 9% per year, and was scheduled to mature on September 24, 2020. The loan was secured by a second priority security interest in all of Premier Trailer’s assets, including, without limitation, its fleet of trailers, and the equity interests of Premier Trailer. On August 9, 2016, Premier Trailer satisfied its obligations in connection with the loan by making a prepayment of $2,581,944, comprised of all outstanding principal, accrued interest and a prepayment fee of $50,000. The prepayment fee was recognized as additional finance income.

On December 20, 2016, we, Fund Fourteen and Fund Fifteen entered into a secured term loan credit facility agreement with CFL Momentum Beheer B.V. and C.V. CFL Momentum (collectively, “CFL”) to provide a credit facility of up to $7,400,000, of which our commitment of $592,000 was funded on December 21, 2016. The loan bears interest at 8% per year and we are entitled to an equity participation fee based partly on the fair market value of the vessel upon repayment of the loan. The loan is for a period of four years, maturing on December 21, 2020. The loan is secured by, among other things, a first priority security interest in and earnings from a motor cargo vessel.

On December 30, 2016, we, Fund Fourteen and Fund Fifteen entered into a secured term loan agreement with Lubricating Specialties Company (“LSC”) to provide a loan in the aggregate amount of $32,500,000, of which our commitment of $2,600,000 was funded on such date. The loan bears interest at LIBOR, subject to a 1% floor, plus 11.0%

35

ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
  (A Delaware Statutory Trust) 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2016


per year, and is for a period of four years maturing on December 30, 2020. The loan is secured by a second priority security interest in LSC's accounts receivable and inventory and a first priority security interest in all of LSC’s other assets.

(4)   Net Investment in Finance Lease
 
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, we had no net investment in finance lease on non-accrual status and no net investment in finance lease that was past due 90 days or more and still accruing.
 
 Net investment in finance lease consisted of the following:
 
December 31,
 
2016
 
2015
Minimum rents receivable
$
3,632,897

 
$
7,264,801

Initial direct costs
22,114

 
87,548

Unearned income
(192,007
)
 
(786,604
)
Net investment in finance lease
$
3,463,004

 
$
6,565,745


On September 4, 2014, a joint venture owned 52% by us, 33.5% by Fund Fourteen and 14.5% by ICON ECI Partners L.P. (“ECI Partners”), an entity also managed by our Investment Manager, purchased certain land-based seismic testing equipment for $10,677,018. Simultaneously, the seismic testing equipment was leased to Geokinetics Inc., Geokinetics USA, Inc. and Geokinetics Acquisition Company (collectively, “Geokinetics”) for three years. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, due to damage to certain of the assets on lease, we received a total of $48,076 and $216,023, respectively, based on the stipulated loss values of such assets pursuant to the lease agreement. As a result, future minimum rents receivable and residual values were reduced and we recognized additional finance income of $4,760 and $11,083 during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
 
On February 15, 2017, we purchased all of ECI Partners’ limited liability company interests in the joint venture for a purchase price of $501,794. As a result, the joint venture is owned 66.5% by us and 33.5% by Fund Fourteen.

Non-cancelable minimum annual amounts due on investment in finance lease over the next five years and thereafter consisted of the following at December 31, 2016:
Years Ending December 31,
 
2017
$
3,632,897

2018

2019

2020

2021

Thereafter

 
$
3,632,897








36

ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
  (A Delaware Statutory Trust) 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2016


(5)   Investment in Joint Ventures
 
On September 12, 2013, a joint venture owned by us, ICON Leasing Fund Eleven Liquidating Trust (formerly, ICON Leasing Fund Eleven, LLC) (“Fund Eleven”), an entity also managed by our Investment Manager, and Fund Twelve purchased mining equipment for $15,106,570. The equipment was subject to a 24-month lease with Murray Energy Corporation and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Murray”). On December 1, 2013 and February 1, 2014, we contributed capital of $933,678 and $1,725,517, respectively, to the joint venture, inclusive of acquisition fees. Subsequent to our second capital contribution, the joint venture was owned 19.8% by us, 67% by Fund Eleven and 13.2% by Fund Twelve. The lease was scheduled to expire on September 30, 2015, but was extended for one month with an additional lease payment of $635,512. On October 29, 2015, Murray purchased the equipment pursuant to the terms of the lease for $2,991,400. As a result, a gain on sale of assets of $448,710 was recognized by the joint venture, of which our share was $88,845. Pursuant to a remarketing agreement with a third party, the joint venture paid an aggregate remarketing fee of $766,466 as part of the transaction.

Information as to the results of operations of this joint venture is summarized as follows:  
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
Revenue
 
$

 
$
6,803,835

Net (loss) income
 
$
(2,017
)
 
$
1,528,271

Our share of net (loss) income
 
$
(399
)
 
$
281,497


On March 4, 2014, a joint venture owned 10% by us, 60% by Fund Twelve, 15% by Fund Fourteen and 15% by Fund Fifteen purchased mining equipment from an affiliate of Blackhawk Mining, LLC (“Blackhawk”). Simultaneously, the mining equipment was leased to Blackhawk and its affiliates for four years. The aggregate purchase price for the mining equipment of $25,359,446 was funded by $17,859,446 in cash and $7,500,000 of non-recourse long-term debt. Our contribution to the joint venture was $1,795,597. On October 27, 2015, the joint venture amended the lease with Blackhawk to waive Blackhawk’s breach of a financial covenant during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 in consideration for a partial prepayment of $3,502,514, which included an amendment fee of $75,000. In addition, corresponding amendments were made to certain payment and repurchase provisions of the lease to account for the partial prepayment. On December 8, 2015 and December 7, 2016, the joint venture further amended the lease with Blackhawk to, among other things, add, revise and/or waive Blackhawk’s breach of certain financial covenants and received additional amendment fees of $75,000 and $150,000, respectively.
 
Information as to the results of operations of this joint venture is summarized as follows:  
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
Revenue
 
$
1,904,372

 
$
2,553,709

Net income
 
$
1,431,731

 
$
1,822,698

Our share of net income
 
$
145,131

 
$
184,516


On March 28, 2014, a joint venture owned 12.5% by us, 60% by Fund Twelve and 27.5% by Fund Fifteen purchased trucks, trailers and other equipment from subsidiaries of D&T Holdings, LLC (“D&T”) for $12,200,000. Simultaneously, the trucks, trailers and other equipment were leased to D&T and its subsidiaries for 57 months. Our contribution to the joint venture was $1,484,705. On September 15, 2014, the lease agreement with D&T was amended to allow D&T to increase its capital expenditure limit. In consideration for agreeing to such increase, lease payments of $1,480,000 that were scheduled to be paid in 2018 were paid by October 31, 2014. In addition, the joint venture received an amendment fee of $100,000. On January 14, 2016, D&T satisfied its remaining lease obligations by making a prepayment of $8,000,000. In addition, D&T exercised its option to repurchase all assets under the lease for $1, upon which title was transferred. As a result of the prepayment, the joint venture recognized finance income of approximately $1,400,000, of which our share was approximately $175,000.

37

ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
  (A Delaware Statutory Trust) 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2016


 
Information as to the results of operations of this joint venture is summarized as follows:
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
Revenue
 
$
1,491,704

 
$
1,455,002

Net income
 
$
1,420,911

 
$
1,334,444

Our share of net income
 
$
183,304

 
$
168,090


On July 10, 2015, a joint venture owned 10% by us, 50% by Fund Fifteen and 40% by Fund Fourteen purchased auxiliary support equipment and robots used in the production of certain automobiles for $9,934,118, which were simultaneously leased to Challenge Mfg. Company, LLC and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Challenge”) for 60 months. Our contribution to the joint venture was $998,379. On June 8, 2016, an unaffiliated third party purchased 100% of the limited liability company interests of the joint venture for net sales proceeds of $9,004,214. No significant gain or loss was recorded by us as a result of the sale.
 
Information as to the results of operations of this joint venture is summarized as follows:
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
Revenue
 
$
463,524

 
$
531,433

Net income
 
$
482,159

 
$
512,433

Our share of net income
 
$
48,216

 
$
51,243


  On December 29, 2015, a joint venture owned 25% by us and 75% by Fund Fifteen purchased stamping presses and miscellaneous support equipment used in the production of certain automobiles for $11,978,455, which were simultaneously leased to Challenge for 60 months. Our contribution to the joint venture was $3,009,587. On June 8, 2016, an unaffiliated third party purchased 100% of the limited liability company interests of the joint venture for net sales proceeds of $11,551,806. As a result, we recorded a gain on sale of investment in joint venture of $17,681.    
 
Information as to the results of operations of this joint venture is summarized as follows:

 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
Revenue
 
$
599,122

 
$
7,820

Net income
 
$
598,822

 
$
7,820

Our share of net income
 
$
149,705

 
$
1,955


On December 23, 2015, a joint venture owned 10% by us, 75% by Fund Fifteen and 15% by Fund Fourteen, through two indirect subsidiaries, entered into memoranda of agreement to purchase two geotechnical drilling vessels, the Fugro Scout and the Fugro Voyager (collectively, the “Fugro Vessels”), from affiliates of Fugro N.V. (“Fugro”) for an aggregate purchase price of $130,000,000. The Fugro Scout and the Fugro Voyager were delivered on December 24, 2015 and January 8, 2016, respectively. The Fugro Vessels were bareboat chartered to affiliates of Fugro for a period of 12 years upon the delivery of each respective vessel, although such charters can be terminated by the indirect subsidiaries after year five. On December 24, 2015, the Fugro Scout was acquired for (i) $8,250,000 in cash, (ii) $45,500,000 of financing through a senior secured loan from ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (“ABN AMRO”), Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (“Rabobank”) and NIBC Bank N.V. (“NIBC”) and (iii) a seller's credit of $11,250,000. As of December 31, 2015, the cash portion of the purchase price for the Fugro Voyager of approximately $10,221,000 was being held by the applicable indirect subsidiary of the joint venture until delivery of the vessel. On January 8, 2016, the Fugro Voyager was also acquired for $8,250,000 in cash, $45,500,000 of financing through a senior secured loan from ABN AMRO, Rabobank and NIBC

38

ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
  (A Delaware Statutory Trust) 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2016


and a seller's credit of $11,250,000. The senior secured loans bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.95% per year and mature on December 31, 2020. On February 8, 2016, the two indirect subsidiaries entered into interest rate swap agreements to effectively fix the interest rate of the senior secured loans from a variable rate of LIBOR plus 2.95% per year to a fixed rate of 4.117% per year. Our contribution to the joint venture totaling $2,377,250 was made in December 2015.

As a result of Fugro obtaining additional third party financing, effective December 31, 2016, the indirect subsidiaries and the affiliates of Fugro amended the bareboat charters to, among other things, increase the daily charter rate and provide for additional security deposits. Also, effective December 31, 2016, the indirect subsidiaries amended the facility agreement with ABN AMRO, Rabobank and NIBC to, among other things, increase the interest rate on the senior secured loans to share the economic benefits of the amended bareboat charters.

Information as to the results of operations of this joint venture is summarized as follows:

 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
Revenue
 
$
13,050,830

 
$
152,000

Net income
 
$
3,368,433

 
$
38,421

Our share of net income
 
$
336,843

 
$
3,842


(6)   Revolving Line of Credit, Recourse
 
We entered into an agreement with California Bank & Trust (“CB&T”) for a revolving line of credit through March 31, 2015 of up to $5,000,000 (the “Facility”), which is secured by all of our assets not subject to a first priority lien. On March 31, 2015, we extended the Facility through May 30, 2017. As part of such extension, we paid debt financing costs of $19,000. Amounts available under the Facility are subject to a borrowing base that is determined, subject to certain limitations, by the present value of the future receivables under certain loans and lease agreements in which we have a beneficial interest.
 
The interest rate for general advances under the Facility is CB&T’s prime rate. We may elect to designate up to five advances on the outstanding principal balance of the Facility to bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.5% per year. In all instances, borrowings under the Facility are subject to an interest rate floor of 4.0% per year. In addition, we are obligated to pay an annualized 0.5% fee on unused commitments under the Facility. As of December 31, 2015, we had $1,500,000 outstanding under the Facility, of which we repaid $1,000,000 and $500,000 on February 9, 2016 and March 29, 2016, respectively. At December 31, 2016, there were no obligations outstanding under the Facility and we were in compliance with the covenants related to the Facility.

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, we had capitalized net debt financing costs of $3,603 and $12,395, respectively, which were included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we recognized additional interest expense of $8,792 and $10,315, respectively, related to the amortization of debt financing costs.

At December 31, 2016, we had $1,073,827 available under the Facility pursuant to the borrowing base.  
  
(7)   Transactions with Related Parties
 
We have entered into certain agreements with our Investment Manager and CION Securities whereby we paid or pay certain fees and reimbursements to these parties. We paid or pay CION Securities (i) a dealer-manager fee for Class A shares sold in the offering equal to 2% of gross offering proceeds from sales of such Class A shares for managing the offering and to reimburse the dealer-manager for wholesaling fees and expenses and (ii) a distribution fee equal to 0.55% of gross offering proceeds from Class I shares sold in the offering for managing the distribution of the Class I shares. We will continue to pay the distribution fee with respect to the Class I shares sold in the offering until the earlier to occur of: (i) total distribution fees paid with respect to the Class I shares following the completion of the offering equaling 10% of the gross proceeds received with respect to the issuance of such shares from the primary portion of the offering or (ii) our entry into our wind

39

ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
  (A Delaware Statutory Trust) 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2016


down period. The distribution fee is paid monthly in arrears. No dealer-manager or distribution fees were or will be paid on any Shares sold pursuant to the DRIP. During each year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we paid distribution fees of $2,035, which were previously accrued in due to Investment Manager and affiliates, net on our consolidated balance sheets.
 
Our Managing Owner also has a 1% interest in our profits, losses, distributions and liquidation proceeds, subject to increase based on our investors achieving a preferred return. In addition, our Investment Manager and its affiliates were reimbursed for a portion of the organization and offering expenses incurred in connection with our organization and offering of Shares and will be reimbursed for administrative expenses incurred in connection with our operations. The reimbursement of organization and offering expenses was capped at the lesser of 1.44% of the maximum primary offering amount of $241,000,000 and the actual costs and expenses incurred by our Investment Manager and its affiliates. Through the end of our offering period, our Investment Manager and its affiliates incurred organization and offering expenses of $1,759,237 on our behalf, of which our Investment Manager and its affiliates determined only to seek reimbursement of $239,758.
 
We pay our Investment Manager (i) a management fee of up to 3.50% of the gross periodic payments due and paid from our investments and (ii) acquisition fees of up to 2.50% of the total purchase price (including indebtedness incurred or assumed therewith) of, or the value of the Capital Assets secured by or subject to, each of our investments. Effective July 1, 2016, our Investment Manager reduced its management fee by 50% (up to 1.75% of the gross periodic payments due and paid from our investments).
 
Administrative expense reimbursements are costs incurred by our Investment Manager or its affiliates that are necessary to our operations. These costs include our Investment Manager’s and its affiliates’ legal, accounting, investor relations and operations personnel, as well as professional fees and other costs that are charged to us. Excluded are salaries and related costs, office rent, travel expenses and other administrative costs incurred by individuals with a controlling interest in our Investment Manager.
 
We paid distributions to our Managing Owner of $10,669 and $14,182 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Additionally, our Managing Owner’s interest in the net income attributable to us was $82 and $2,875 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Fees and other expenses incurred by us to our Investment Manager or its affiliates were as follows:
  
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Entity
 
Capacity
 
Description
 
2016
 
2015
ICON Capital, LLC
 
Investment Manager
 
Management fees (1)
 
$
198,086

 
$
163,589

ICON Capital, LLC
 
Investment Manager
 
Administrative expense
  reimbursements (1)
 
492,784

 
524,606

ICON Capital, LLC
 
Investment Manager
 
Acquisition fees (2)
 

 
424,701

 
 
 
 
 
 
$
690,870

 
$
1,112,896

(1)  Amount charged directly to operations. 
 
 
 
 
(2)  Amount capitalized and amortized to operations.
 
 
 
 

At December 31, 2016, we had a net payable of $169,137 due to our Investment Manager and affiliates that primarily consisted of administrative expense reimbursements of $170,138. At December 31, 2015, we had a net payable of $553,021 due to our Investment Manager and affiliates that primarily consisted of acquisition fees of $399,865 and administrative expense reimbursements of $188,537.

In June 2016, we sold our interests in certain of our joint ventures to unaffiliated third parties. In connection with the sales, the third parties required that an affiliate of our Investment Manager provides bookkeeping and administrative services related to such assets for a fee.
 




40

ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
  (A Delaware Statutory Trust) 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2016


(8)   Fair Value Measurements
 
Assets and liabilities carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
 
Level 1: Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
Level 2: Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
Level 3: Pricing inputs that are generally unobservable and are supported by little or no market data.

Assets for which Fair Value is Disclosed
 
Our fixed-rate notes receivable, for which fair value is required to be disclosed, were valued using inputs that are generally unobservable and are supported by little or no market data and are therefore classified within Level 3. Under U.S. GAAP, we use projected cash flows for fair value measurements of these financial assets. Fair value information with respect to certain of our other assets and liabilities is not separately provided since (i) U.S. GAAP does not require fair value disclosures of lease arrangements and (ii) the carrying value of financial assets and liabilities, other than lease-related investments, including the recorded value of our Facility, approximates fair value due to their short-term maturities and/or variable interest rates.
 
The estimated fair value of our fixed-rate notes receivable was based on the discounted value of future cash flows related to the loans at inception, adjusted for changes in certain variables, including, but not limited to, credit quality, industry, financial markets and other recent comparables. The fair value of the principal outstanding on our fixed-rate notes receivable was derived using discount rates ranging between 8.0% and 12.0% as of December 31, 2016.

 
December 31, 2016
 
Carrying Amount
 
Fair Value (Level 3)
Principal outstanding on fixed-rate notes receivable
$
3,192,000

 
$
3,192,000


(9)   Concentrations of Risks
 
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to two significant types of economic risk: credit and market.  Credit risk is the risk of a borrower, lessee or other counterparty’s inability or unwillingness to make contractually required payments. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to borrowers, lessees or other counterparties are dispersed across different industry segments within the United States and throughout the world.
 
Market risk reflects the change in the value of debt instruments, derivatives and credit facilities due to changes in interest rate spreads or other market factors. We believe that the carrying value of our investments is reasonable, taking into consideration these risks, along with estimated collateral values, payment history and other relevant information.
 
At times, our cash may exceed insured limits. We have placed these funds in a high quality institution in order to minimize the risk of loss relating to exceeding insured limits.
 
For the year ended December 31, 2016, we had one lessee and one borrower that accounted for 99.3% of our finance income. Our income from investment in joint ventures was primarily derived from our investment in five joint ventures.
 
For the year ended December 31, 2015, we had one lessee and one borrower that accounted for 100% of our finance income. Our income from investment in joint ventures was derived from our investment in six joint ventures.
 
As of December 31, 2016, we had one lessee and one borrower that accounted for 39.6% of total assets.  Additionally, we had one lessee through our joint venture investments that accounted for 17.2% of total assets.
 
As of December 31, 2015, we had one lessee and one borrower that accounted for 48.0% of total assets.  Additionally, we had two lessees through our joint venture investments that accounted for 28.1% of total assets.  



41

ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
  (A Delaware Statutory Trust) 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2016


(10)  Geographic Information
     
Geographic information for revenue, long-lived assets and other assets deemed relatively illiquid, based on the country of origin, was as follows:  
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2016
 
North America
 
Vessels (a)
 
Total
Revenue and other income:
 
 
 
 
 
Finance income
$
617,737

 
$
2,487

 
$
620,224

Income from investment in joint ventures
$
525,957

 
$
336,844

 
$
862,801

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
At December 31, 2016
 
North America
 
Vessels (a)
 
Total
Long-lived assets:
 
 
 
 
 
Net investment in notes receivable
$
2,418,267

 
$
581,069

 
$
2,999,336

Net investment in finance lease
$
3,463,004

 
$

 
$
3,463,004

Investment in joint ventures
$
793,789

 
$
2,547,936

 
$
3,341,725

 (a) Vessels are generally free to trade worldwide.

 
Year Ended December 31, 2015
 
North America
 
Vessel (a)
 
Total
Revenue and other income:
 
 
 
 
 
Finance income
$
1,083,420

 
$

 
$
1,083,420

Income from investment in joint ventures
$
687,301

 
$
3,842

 
$
691,143

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
At December 31, 2015
 
North America
 
Vessel (a)
 
Total
Long-lived assets:
 
 
 
 
 
Net investment in note receivable
$
2,618,465

 
$

 
$
2,618,465

Net investment in finance lease
$
6,565,745

 
$

 
$
6,565,745

Investment in joint ventures
$
5,783,857

 
$
2,381,092

 
$
8,164,949

 (a) Vessel is generally free to trade worldwide.

(11) Commitments and Contingencies
 
At the time we acquire or divest of our interest in Capital Assets, we may, under very limited circumstances, agree to indemnify the seller or buyer for specific contingent liabilities. Our Managing Owner believes that any liability of ours that may arise as a result of any such indemnification obligations may or may not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations taken as a whole.
  
(12) Income Tax Reconciliation (unaudited)
 
At December 31, 2016 and 2015, shareholders’ capital included in the consolidated financial statements totaled $12,293,128 and $13,351,869, respectively. Shareholders’ capital for federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2016 and 2015 totaled $13,005,669 and $14,471,273, respectively. The difference arises primarily from sales and offering expenses reported as a reduction in shareholders' capital accounts for financial reporting purposes, but not for federal income tax reporting purposes, and differences in taxable income from joint ventures primarily related to differences in depreciation and amortization and noncontrolling interests between financial reporting purposes and federal income tax reporting purposes.
 


42

ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
  (A Delaware Statutory Trust) 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2016


The following table reconciles net income attributable to us for financial statement reporting purposes to net income attributable to us for federal income tax purposes for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2016
 
2015
Net income attributable to Fund Sixteen per financial statements
$
8,182

 
$
287,459

Taxable (loss) income from joint ventures
(902,345
)
 
11,294

Taxable income attributable to noncontrolling interests
250,726

 
356,864

Other
241,244

 
(146,023
)
Net (loss) income attributable to Fund Sixteen for federal income tax purposes
$
(402,193
)
 
$
509,594



43


Item 9.   Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
 
None.  

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
 
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
 
In connection with the preparation of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, our Managing Owner carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the management of our Managing Owner, including its Co-Chief Executive Officers and the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our Managing Owner’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on the foregoing evaluation, the Co-Chief Executive Officers and the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer concluded that our Managing Owner’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
 
In designing and evaluating our Managing Owner’s disclosure controls and procedures, our Managing Owner recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Our Managing Owner’s disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to meet reasonable assurance standards. Disclosure controls and procedures cannot detect or prevent all error and fraud. Some inherent limitations in disclosure controls and procedures include costs of implementation, faulty decision-making, simple error and mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based, in part, upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all anticipated and unanticipated future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with established policies or procedures.
 
Our Managing Owner’s Co-Chief Executive Officers and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer have determined that no weakness in disclosure controls and procedures had any material effect on the accuracy and completeness of our financial reporting and disclosure included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
Evaluation of internal control over financial reporting
 
Our Managing Owner is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
Our Managing Owner assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” as issued in 2013.
 
Based on its assessment, our Managing Owner believes that, as of December 31, 2016, its internal control over financial reporting is effective.
 
Changes in internal control over financial reporting
     
There were no changes in our Managing Owner’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2016 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.

44



Item 9B. Other Information

Not applicable.


45


PART III
 
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers of the Registrant's Managing Owner and Corporate Governance
  
Our Managing Owner
 
Our Managing Owner was formed as a Delaware limited liability company on January 3, 2013 to act as our managing owner. Its principal office is located at 3 Park Avenue, 36th Floor, New York, New York 10016, and its telephone number is (212) 418-4700. The sole member of our Managing Owner is ICON Capital, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“ICON Capital”). 

Name
 
Age
 
Title
Michael A. Reisner
 
46
 
Co-Chairman, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Co-President and Director
Mark Gatto
 
44
 
Co-Chairman, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Co-President and Director
Christine H. Yap
 
46
 
Managing Director and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

Biographical information regarding the officers and directors of our Managing Owner follows the table setting forth information regarding our Investment Manager’s current executive officers and directors.
 
Our Investment Manager
  
Our Investment Manager, ICON Capital, was formed in 1985. Our Investment Manager's principal office is located at 3 Park Avenue, 36th Floor, New York, New York 10016, and its telephone number is (212) 418-4700.
 
In addition to the primary services related to our making and disposing of investments, our Investment Manager provides services relating to the day-to-day management of our investments. These services include collecting payments due from lessees, borrowers, and other counterparties; remarketing Capital Assets that are off-lease; inspecting Capital Assets; serving as a liaison with lessees, borrowers, and other counterparties; supervising equipment maintenance; and monitoring performance by lessees, borrowers, and other counterparties of their obligations, including payment of contractual payments and all operating expenses. 

Name
 
Age
 
Title
Michael A. Reisner
 
46
 
Co-Chairman, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Co-President and Director
Mark Gatto
 
44
 
Co-Chairman, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Co-President and Director
Christine H. Yap
 
46
 
Managing Director and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

Michael A. Reisner, Co-Chairman, Co-CEO, Co-President and Director, joined ICON Capital in 2001. Prior to purchasing the company in 2008, Mr. Reisner held various positions in the firm, including Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Executive Vice President of Acquisitions. Before his tenure with ICON Capital, Mr. Reisner was an attorney from 1996 to 2001 with Brodsky Altman & McMahon, LLP in New York, concentrating on commercial transactions. Mr. Reisner received a J.D. from New York Law School and a B.A. from the University of Vermont.
 
Mark Gatto, Co-Chairman, Co-CEO, Co-President and Director, originally joined ICON Capital in 1999. Prior to purchasing the company in 2008, Mr. Gatto held various positions in the firm, including Executive Vice President and Chief Acquisitions Officer, Executive Vice President - Business Development and Associate General Counsel. Before his tenure with ICON Capital, he was an attorney with Cella & Goldstein in New Jersey, concentrating on commercial transactions and general litigation matters. Additionally, he was Director of Player Licensing for the Topps Company and in 2003, he co-founded a specialty business consulting firm in New York City, where he served as managing partner before re-joining ICON Capital in 2005. Mr. Gatto received an M.B.A. from the W. Paul Stillman School of Business at Seton Hall University, a J.D. from Seton Hall University School of Law, and a B.S. from Montclair State University.




46


Christine H. Yap, Managing Director and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, joined ICON Capital in May 2013 as a Senior Director of Accounting and Finance and was promoted to Principal Financial and Accounting Officer in September 2014. Prior to joining ICON Capital, Ms. Yap was previously a Vice President and Fund Controller at W.P. Carey Inc. from October 2011 to December 2012. Prior to W.P. Carey, from June 1997 to October 2011, Ms. Yap was employed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, rising to the level of Director. Ms. Yap received a B.S. in Accounting from Meredith College and an M.S. in Accounting from the University of Rhode Island and is a certified public accountant.

Code of Ethics
Our Investment Manager, on our behalf, has adopted a code of ethics for its Co-Chief Executive Officers and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer. The Code of Ethics is available free of charge by requesting it in writing from our Investment Manager. Our Investment Manager's address is 3 Park Avenue, 36th Floor, New York, New York 10016.

47



Item 11. Executive Compensation
 
We have no directors or officers. Our Investment Manager and affiliates were paid or we accrued the following compensation and reimbursement for costs and expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Entity
 
Capacity
 
Description
 
2016
 
2015
ICON Capital, LLC
 
Investment Manager
 
Management fees (1)
 
$
198,086

 
$
163,589

ICON Capital, LLC
 
Investment Manager
 
Administrative expense
 reimbursements (1)
 
492,784

 
524,606

ICON Capital, LLC
 
Investment Manager
 
Acquisition fees (2)
 

 
424,701

 
 
 
 
 
 
$
690,870

 
$
1,112,896

 
(1) Amount charged directly to operations. 
(2) Amount capitalized and amortized to operations.
 
Our Managing Owner has a 1% interest in our profits, losses, distributions and liquidation proceeds. We paid distributions to our Managing Owner of $10,669 and $14,182 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Additionally, our Managing Owner’s interest in the net income attributable to us was $82 and $2,875 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
 
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and the Managing Owner and Related Security Holder Matters
 
(a)   We do not have any securities authorized for issuance under any equity compensation plan. The following table sets forth, as of March 27, 2017, the beneficial ownership of each person who is known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of the outstanding Shares.
Name of Beneficial Owner
 
Number of Shares Owned Beneficially (1)
 
Percentage (2)
The Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe Housing and Land Expendable Trust Fund
 
1,013

 
5.8
%
The Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe Future Securities Expendable Trust Fund
 
1,013

 
5.8
%
Brad Heckenberg IRA
 
937

 
5.3
%

(1)     Represents ownership of Class A shares. Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Ownership information for those persons who beneficially own 5% or more of our Shares is solely based upon information furnished by our transfer agent.

(2) Based on a total of 17,599 Shares, consisting of 17,189 Class A and 410 Class I shares, issued and outstanding on March 27, 2017. Other than differing allocable fees and expenses, the Class A shares and Class I shares have identical rights and privileges, such as identical voting and distribution rights.

(b)   As of March 27, 2017, no directors or officers of our Managing Owner own any of our equity securities.
 
(c)   Neither we nor our Managing Owner are aware of any arrangements with respect to our securities, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of us.
 

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
 
See “Item 11. Executive Compensation” for a discussion of our related party transactions. See Notes 5 and 7 to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our investment in joint ventures and transactions with related parties, respectively.
 


48


Because we are not listed on any national securities exchange or inter-dealer quotation system, we have elected to use the Nasdaq Stock Market’s definition of “independent director” in evaluating whether any of our Managing Owner’s directors are independent. Under this definition, the board of directors of our Managing Owner has determined that our Managing Owner does not have any independent directors, nor are we required to have any.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
 
During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, our auditors provided audit services relating to our Annual Reports on Form 10-K and our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.  The following table presents the fees for audit services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
 
 
2016
 
2015
Audit fees
$
140,233

 
$
120,329

Tax fees
50,510

 
23,916

 
$
190,743

 
$
144,245



49


PART IV
 
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a)   1. Financial Statements
See index to financial statements included as Item 8 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K hereof.
2. Financial Statement Schedules
Schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or the information required to be set forth therein is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
3. Exhibits:
3.1 Certificate of Trust of Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on November 26, 2012 (File No. 333-185144)).
4.1    Form of Third Amended and Restated Trust Agreement of Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to Registrant’s Prospectus Supplement No. 4 filed with the SEC on April 2, 2014 (File No.333-185144)).
10.1  Form of Investment Management Agreement, by and between ICON ECI Fund Sixteen and ICON Capital, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on February 1, 2013 (File No. 333-185144)).
10.2  Commercial Loan Agreement, by and between California Bank & Trust and ICON ECI Fund Sixteen, dated as of December 26, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed March 28, 2014).
10.3 Loan Modification Agreement, by and between California Bank & Trust and ICON ECI Fund Sixteen, dated as of March 31, 2015 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015, filed on May 8, 2015).
31.1  Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Co-Chief Executive Officer.
31.2  Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Co-Chief Executive Officer.
31.3  Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer.
32.1  Certification of Co-Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2  Certification of Co-Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.3  Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS     XBRL Instance Document.
 
101.SCH   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
 
101.CAL   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
 
101.DEF    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
 
101.LAB   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document.
 
101.PRE    XBRLTaxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
    
None.

50


SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
(Registrant)
 
By: ICON MT 16, LLC
(Managing Owner of the Registrant)
 
March 28, 2017
 
By: /s/ Michael A. Reisner
Michael A. Reisner
Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President
(Co-Principal Executive Officer)
  
By: /s/ Mark Gatto
Mark Gatto
Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President
(Co-Principal Executive Officer)
 
        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
ICON ECI Fund Sixteen
(Registrant)
 
By: ICON MT 16, LLC
(Managing Owner of the Registrant)
 
March 28, 2017
 
By: /s/ Michael A. Reisner
Michael A. Reisner
Co-Chief Executive Officer, Co-President and Director
(Co-Principal Executive Officer)
 
By: /s/ Mark Gatto
Mark Gatto
Co-Chief Executive Officer, Co-President and Director
(Co-Principal Executive Officer)
 
By: /s/ Christine H. Yap
Christine H. Yap
Managing Director
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


51