Attached files

file filename
EX-32.1 - POOL CEO AND CFO SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION - POOL CORPexhibit321_2016.htm
EX-31.2 - POOL CEO SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION - POOL CORPexhibit312_2016.htm
EX-31.1 - POOL CFO SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION - POOL CORPexhibit311_2016.htm
EX-23.1 - CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP - POOL CORPexhibit231_2016.htm
EX-21.1 - POOL SUBSIDIARY LISTING - POOL CORPexhibit211_2016.htm
EX-10.12 - POOL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ARVAN - POOL CORPexhibit1012employmentagree.htm


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
or
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from              to             
Commission File Number: 0-26640
newpoolcorpa15.jpg 
POOL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
36-3943363
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
 
109 Northpark Boulevard, Covington, Louisiana
70433-5001
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
985-892-5521
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: 
Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share
NASDAQ Global Select Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    YES  x    NO  ¨ 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.    YES  ¨    NO  x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.           YES  x    NO  ¨




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YES x    NO ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x
Accelerated filer ¨
 
 
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  YES  ¨    NO  x
The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant based on the closing sales price of the registrant’s common stock as of June 30, 2016 was $3,780,739,528.
As of February 20, 2017, there were 41,156,023 shares of common stock outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement to be mailed to stockholders on or about March 29, 2017 for the
Annual Meeting to be held on May 2, 2017, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.




POOL CORPORATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
 
 
 
Page
PART I.
 
 
 
 
Item 1. 
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
 
 
PART II.
 
 
 
 
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
 
 
PART III.
 
 
 
 
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
 
 
PART IV.
 
 
 
 
Item 15.
Item 16.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




PART I.
Item 1.  Business

General

Pool Corporation (the Company, which may be referred to as we, us or our) is the world’s largest wholesale distributor of swimming pool supplies, equipment and related leisure products and is one of the top three distributors of irrigation and landscape products in the United States.  The Company was incorporated in the State of Delaware in 1993 and has grown from a regional distributor to a multi-national, multi-network distribution company. 

Our industry is highly fragmented, and as such, we add considerable value to the industry by purchasing products from a large number of manufacturers and then distributing the products to our customer base on conditions that are more favorable than our customers could obtain on their own.

As of December 31, 2016, we operated 344 sales centers in North America, Europe, South America and Australia through our four distribution networks:

SCP Distributors (SCP);
Superior Pool Products (Superior);
Horizon Distributors (Horizon); and
National Pool Tile (NPT).

Beginning in 2014, we identified NPT as a separate distribution network. Through this network, we sell specialized products under the NPT brand including tile, decking materials and interior pool finishes, as well as hardscape and natural stone products. Please refer to our “Business Strategy and Growth” section below for more detailed information regarding the development of our NPT distribution network.

Superior and Horizon are both wholly owned subsidiaries of SCP, which is wholly owned by Pool Corporation.

Our Industry

We believe that the swimming pool industry is relatively young, with room for continued growth from the increased penetration of new pools. Of the approximately 80 million homes in the United States that have the economic capacity and the yard space to have a swimming pool, approximately 11% currently have a pool. Significant growth opportunities also reside with pool remodel and pool equipment replacement activities due to the aging of the installed base of swimming pools, technological advancements and the development of energy-efficient products. The irrigation and landscape industry shares many characteristics with the pool industry, and we believe that it will realize long-term growth rates similar to the pool industry. As irrigation system installations and landscaping often occur in tandem with new single-family home construction, we believe the continued trend in increased housing starts also offers significant opportunities for the irrigation and landscape industry.

Favorable demographic and socioeconomic trends have positively impacted our industry and we believe these trends will continue to do so in the long term.  These favorable trends include the following:

long-term growth in housing units in warmer markets due to the population migration toward the southern United States, which contributes to the growing installed base of pools that homeowners must maintain;
increased homeowner spending on outdoor living spaces for relaxation and entertainment;
consumers bundling the purchase of a swimming pool and other products, with new irrigation systems and landscaping often being key components to both pool installations and remodels; and
consumers using more automation and control products, higher quality materials and other pool features that add to our sales opportunities over time.

Approximately 60% of consumer spending in the pool industry is for maintenance and minor repair of existing swimming pools.  Maintaining proper chemical balance and the related upkeep and repair of swimming pool equipment, such as pumps, heaters, filters and safety equipment, creates a non-discretionary demand for pool chemicals, equipment and other related parts and supplies.  We also believe cosmetic considerations such as a pool’s appearance and the overall look of backyard environments create an ongoing demand for other maintenance-related goods and certain discretionary products.
 

1


We believe that the recurring nature of the maintenance and repair market has historically helped maintain a relatively consistent rate of industry growth.  This characteristic, along with relatively consistent inflationary price increases of 1% to 2% on average passed on by manufacturers and distributors, has helped cushion the negative impact on revenues in periods when unfavorable economic conditions and softness in the housing market adversely impacted pool construction and major replacement and refurbishment activities.

The following table reflects growth in the domestic installed base of in-ground swimming pools over the past 11 years (based on Company estimates and information from 2014 P.K. Data, Inc. reports):

installed2016a.jpg

The replacement and refurbishment market currently accounts for close to 30% of consumer spending in the pool industry.  The activity in this market, which includes major swimming pool remodeling, is driven by the aging of the installed base of pools. The timing of these types of expenditures is more sensitive to economic factors that impact consumer spending compared to the maintenance and minor repair market.

New swimming pool construction comprises the bulk of the remaining consumer spending in the pool industry.  The demand for new pools is driven by the perceived benefits of pool ownership including relaxation, entertainment, family activity, exercise and convenience.  The industry competes for new pool sales against other discretionary consumer purchases such as kitchen and bathroom remodeling, boats, motorcycles, recreational vehicles and vacations.  The industry is also affected by other factors including, but not limited to, consumer preferences or attitudes toward pool and landscape products for aesthetic, environmental, safety or other reasons.

The irrigation and landscape distribution business is split between residential and commercial markets, with the majority of sales related to the residential market.  Irrigation activities account for approximately 50% of total spending in the irrigation industry, with the remaining 50% of spending related to power equipment, landscape and specialty outdoor products and accessories.  As such, our irrigation business is more heavily weighted toward new home construction activities compared to our pool business. Over the last five years, our irrigation and landscape business has benefited from the continued slow recovery of single-family home construction as irrigation system installations and landscaping projects typically correlate with, but lag, new home construction.

Certain trends in the housing market, the availability of consumer credit and general economic conditions (as commonly measured by Gross Domestic Product or GDP) affect our industry, particularly new pool and irrigation system starts as well as the timing and extent of pool refurbishments and equipment replacement.  We believe that over the long term, single-family housing turnover and home value appreciation may correlate with demand for new pool construction, with higher rates of home turnover and appreciation having a positive impact on new pool starts over time.  We also believe that homeowners’ access to consumer credit is a critical factor enabling the purchase of new swimming pools and irrigation systems.  Similar to other discretionary purchases, replacement and refurbishment activities are more heavily impacted by economic factors such as consumer confidence, GDP and employment.

2



While we estimate that new pool construction has increased to approximately 65,000 - 70,000 new units in 2016 from the historically low levels experienced during the economic downturn, construction levels are still down approximately 65% - 70% compared to peak historical levels and down approximately 55% - 60% from what we consider normal levels.

Over the past five years, the pool industry has continued to show signs of recovery, mostly due to the gradual improvement in remodeling and replacement activity. Our consistent base business sales growth reflects increased consumer discretionary spending and higher replacement activities. Improvements in general external market factors in the United States including consumer confidence, employment, housing, access to consumer credit and economic expansion, largely support our base business growth. Over the last five years, we estimate the pool industry grew from 2% to 4% per year, with favorable weather accelerating growth in any given year and unfavorable weather impeding growth. In 2015 specifically, excessive precipitation impacted our industry in the second quarter; however a mild fall and delayed winter alleviated any contraction in industry growth rates. In 2016, an earlier start to the pool season due to warmer than usual temperatures and overall favorable weather throughout the rest of the year benefited the industry as a whole.

We believe there is potential for continued sales recovery due to the build-up of deferred replacement and remodeling activity over the next several years and our expectation is that new pool and irrigation construction levels will gradually normalize. Additionally, we believe favorable demographics from an aging population and southern migration are ideal for increased residential investment, especially in outdoor lifestyle products. We expect that market conditions in the United States will continue to improve, enabling further recovery of replacement, remodeling and new construction activity to normalized levels over the next 4 to 7 years. We expect that the industry will realize an annual growth rate of approximately 3% to 6% over this time period. As economic trends indicate that consumer spending has been slowly recovering and that residential construction activities will likely continue to gradually improve, we believe that we are well positioned to take advantage of both the eventual market recovery and the inherent long-term growth opportunities in our industry.

Our industry is seasonal and weather is one of the principal external factors that affect our business.  Peak industry activity occurs during the warmest months of the year, typically April through September.  Unseasonable warming or cooling trends can accelerate or delay the start or end of the pool and landscape season, impacting our maintenance and repair sales.  These impacts at the shoulders of the season are generally more pronounced in northern markets in the United States and Canada. Weather also impacts our sales of construction and installation products to the extent that above average precipitation, late spring thaws in northern markets and other extreme weather conditions delay, interrupt or cancel current or planned construction and installation activities.

Business Strategy and Growth

Our mission is to provide exceptional value to our customers and suppliers, in order to provide exceptional return to our shareholders while providing exceptional opportunities to our employees.  Our three core strategies are as follows:

to promote the growth of our industry;
to promote the growth of our customers’ businesses; and
to continuously strive to operate more effectively.

We promote the growth of our industry through various advertising and promotional programs intended to raise consumer awareness of the benefits and affordability of pool ownership, the ease of pool maintenance and the many ways in which a pool and the surrounding spaces may be enjoyed beyond swimming.  These programs include media advertising, industry-oriented website development such as www.swimmingpool.com®, public relations campaigns and other online marketing initiatives including social media.  We use these programs as tools to educate consumers and lead prospective pool owners to our customers.

We promote the growth of our customers’ businesses by offering comprehensive support programs that include promotional tools and marketing support to help our customers generate increased sales.  Our uniquely tailored programs include such features as customer lead generation, personalized websites, brochures, direct mail, marketing campaigns and business development training.  As a customer service, we also provide certain retail store customers assistance with all aspects of their business including site selection, store layout and design, product merchandising, business management system implementation, comprehensive product offering selections and efficient ordering and inventory management processes. In addition to these programs, we feature consumer showrooms in over 80 of our sales centers and host our annual Retail Summit to educate our customers about product offerings and the overall industry. We also act as a day to day resource by offering product and market expertise to serve our customers’ unique needs.


3


In addition to our efforts aimed at industry and customer growth, we strive to operate more effectively by continuously focusing on improvements in our operations such as product sourcing, procurement and logistics initiatives, adoption of enhanced business practices and improved working capital management.  Other key internal growth initiatives include the continued expansion of both our product offerings (as described in the “Customers and Products” section below) and our distribution networks.

With our 2008 acquisition of National Pool Tile Group, Inc., we added a market leading brand of pool tile and composite pool finish products, and gained a position in a wider market. To increase operating efficiency and improve market reach, we have consolidated and repositioned NPT standalone sales centers and established NPT showrooms within certain existing sales centers. In addition to our 17 standalone NPT sales centers, we currently have over 80 SCP and Superior sales centers that feature consumer showrooms where landscape and swimming pool contractors, as well as homeowners, can view and select pool components including tile, decking materials and interior pool finishes in various styles and grades, and serve as stocking locations for our NPT branded products.

We feel the growth opportunities for the NPT network closely align with those of our other networks, as we see continued opportunity to expand under the NPT brand. We also expect potential expansion of the network by broadening our product range and sourcing capabilities. As more consumers create and enhance outdoor living areas and continue to invest in their outdoor environment, we believe we can focus our resources to address such demand, while leveraging our existing pool and irrigation/landscape customer base. We feel the development of our NPT network is a natural extension of our distribution model. While we are currently enjoying an expanding economy and improving housing market, which help fuel demand for these products, this business is more sensitive to these external market factors compared to our business overall.

We have grown our distribution networks through new sales center openings, acquisitions and the expansion of existing sales centers.  Given the more stabilized external environment, we have increased our focus on new sales center openings complemented by strategic acquisitions and consolidations, depending on our market presence. Since the beginning of 2014, we have opened 13 new sales centers, with 6 new sales centers in 2016. We expect to open between 6 and 8 new sales centers in 2017. Since the beginning of 2014, we have completed 8 acquisitions consisting of 21 sales centers (net of sales center consolidations within one year of acquisition).  The acquired locations in 2016 include 8 sales centers added to our Horizon network. Our locations that were consolidated in 2016 include 3 sales centers from our SCP network, 2 from our Horizon network and 1 from our SPP network, which represents a location that was acquired in 2015 and consolidated within one year of acquisition.  We plan to continue to make strategic acquisitions and open new sales centers to further penetrate existing markets and expand into both new geographic markets and new product categories.  For additional discussion of our recent acquisitions, see Note 2 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,” included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

We believe that our high customer service levels and expanded product offerings have enabled us to gain market share historically. Going forward, we expect to realize sales growth higher than the industry average due to further increases in market share and continued expansion of our product offerings.

We estimate that price inflation has averaged 1% to 2% annually in our industry over the past 10 years.  We generally pass industry price increases through the supply chain and make strategic volume inventory purchases ahead of vendor price increases.  We estimate that annual price inflation between 2014 and 2016 was consistent with the ten-year average. We anticipate price inflation will vary some by product lines, but will approximate the ten-year average overall in 2017.

Customers and Products

We serve over 100,000 customers. In 2016, sales to our largest 100 customers collectively accounted for just under 10% of our total sales. We estimate that sales to our largest 1,000 customers represented approximately 25% of our total sales in 2016. Notably, 98% of our customers are small, family-owned businesses with relatively limited capital resources. These core customers generated a large majority of our sales in 2016. Most of these businesses provide labor and technical services to the end consumer and operate as independent contractors employing no more than ten employees (in many cases, working alone or with a limited crew).  These customers also buy from other distributors, mass merchants, home stores, and specialty and internet retailers.

We sell our products primarily to the following types of customers:

swimming pool remodelers and builders;
specialty retailers that sell swimming pool supplies;
swimming pool repair and service businesses;
irrigation construction and landscape maintenance contractors; and
golf courses and other commercial customers.


4


We conduct our operations through 344 sales centers in North America, Europe, South America and Australia. Our primary markets, with the highest concentration of swimming pools, are California, Texas, Florida and Arizona, collectively representing approximately 52% of our 2016 net sales.  In 2016, we generated approximately 95% of our sales in North America, 5% in Europe and less than 1% in South America and Australia combined. References to product line and product category data throughout this Form 10-K generally reflect data related to the North American swimming pool market, as it is more readily available for analysis and represents the largest component of our operations.

We use a combination of local and international sales and marketing personnel to promote the growth of our business and develop and strengthen our customers’ businesses.  Our sales and marketing personnel focus on developing customer programs and promotional activities, creating and enhancing sales management tools and providing product and market expertise.  Our local sales personnel work from our sales centers and are charged with understanding and meeting our customers’ specific needs.

We offer our customers more than 160,000 manufacturer and Pool Corporation branded products.  We believe that our selection of pool equipment, supplies, chemicals, replacement parts, irrigation and landscape products and other pool construction and recreational products is the most comprehensive in the industry.  The types of products we sell are as follows:
 
maintenance products such as chemicals, supplies and pool accessories;
repair and replacement parts for pool equipment, such as cleaners, filters, heaters, pumps and lights;
packaged pool kits including walls, liners, braces and coping for in-ground and above-ground pools;
pool equipment and components for new pool construction and the remodeling of existing pools;
irrigation and landscape products, including irrigation system components and professional lawn care equipment and supplies;
building materials, such as concrete, plumbing and electrical components, both functional and decorative pool surfaces, decking materials, tile, hardscapes and natural stone, used for pool installations and remodeling;
commercial products, including ASME heaters, safety equipment, and commercial pumps and filters; and
other pool construction and recreational products, which consist of a number of product categories and include discretionary recreational and related outdoor lifestyle products that enhance consumers’ use and enjoyment of outdoor living spaces, such as spas, grills and components for outdoor kitchens.

We currently have over 500 product lines and over 50 product categories. Based on our 2016 product classifications, sales for our pool and spa chemicals product category as a percentage of total net sales was 13% in 2016, 2015 and 2014. In 2016 and 2015 chemical sales increased by 6% and 5%, respectively, with little benefit from pricing inflation. No other product category accounted for 10% or more of total net sales in any of the last three fiscal years.

Our maintenance, repair and replacement products are generally described as follows:

maintenance and minor repair (non-discretionary); and
major refurbishment and replacement (partially discretionary).

In 2016, the sale of maintenance and minor repair products accounted for approximately 60% of our sales and gross profits while approximately 40% of our sales and gross profits were derived from the refurbishment, replacement, construction and installation (equipment, materials, plumbing, electrical, etc.) of swimming pools. As recently as five years ago, sales of maintenance and minor repair products had increased to approximately 70% of our sales and gross profits due to the significant declines in new pool construction. This trend reflects a shift back toward a greater percentage of our sales coming from major refurbishment and replacement products due to an ongoing recovery of these activities since levels reached their historic low point in 2009.

Discretionary demand for products related to pool construction and remodeling has been an important factor in our historical base business sales growth.  We have realized sales growth over the past five years due to our ongoing expansion of these product offerings and the steady improvement in new construction, remodeling and economic trends. However, new pool construction remains approximately 65% - 70% below peak historic levels and approximately 55% - 60% below what we believe to be normal levels. We continue to identify new related product categories and we typically introduce new categories each year in select markets.  We then evaluate the performance in these test markets and focus on those product categories that we believe exhibit the best long-term growth potential.  We expect to realize continued sales growth for these types of product offerings by expanding the number of locations that offer these products, increasing the number of products offered at certain locations and continuing a modest broadening of these product offerings on a company-wide basis.


5


In recent years we have experienced product and customer mix changes, including a shift in consumer spending to higher value, lower margin products such as variable speed pumps, high efficiency heaters, LED lighting and irrigation and landscape equipment, which positively contribute to our sales and gross profit growth but negatively impact our gross margin. We expect continued demand for these products, but believe our efforts in various pricing and sourcing initiatives and our expansion of building materials product offerings will help offset these gross margin declines and lead to somewhat flat gross margin trends over the next few years.

Operating Strategy

We distribute swimming pool supplies, equipment and related leisure products domestically through our SCP and Superior networks and internationally through our SCP network. We distribute irrigation and landscape products through our Horizon network and tile, decking materials and interior pool finish products through our NPT network.  We adopted the strategy of operating two distinct distribution networks within the U.S. swimming pool market primarily for two reasons:

to offer our customers a choice of distinctive product selections, locations and service personnel; and
to increase the level of customer service and operational efficiency provided by the sales centers in each network by promoting healthy competition between the two networks.

We evaluate our sales centers based upon their performance relative to predetermined standards that include both financial and operational measures.  Our corporate support groups provide our field operations with various services, such as developing and coordinating customer and vendor related programs, information systems support and expert resources to help them achieve their goals.  We believe our incentive programs and feedback tools, along with the competitive nature of our internal networks, stimulate and enhance employee performance.

Distribution

Our sales centers are located within population centers near customer concentrations, typically in industrial, commercial or mixed‑use zones.  Customers may pick up products at any sales center location, or we may deliver products to their premises or job sites via our trucks or third party carriers.

Our sales centers maintain well-stocked inventories to meet our customers’ immediate needs.  We utilize warehouse management technology to optimize receiving, inventory control, picking, packing and shipping functions. For additional information regarding our inventory management, see Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Estimates - Inventory Obsolescence,” of this Form 10-K.

We also operate four centralized shipping locations (CSLs) that redistribute products we purchase in bulk quantities to our sales centers or in some cases, directly to customers.  Our CSLs are regional locations that carry a wide range of traditional swimming pool, irrigation and related construction products.  

Purchasing and Suppliers

We enjoy good relationships with our suppliers, who generally offer competitive pricing, return policies and promotional allowances.  It is customary in our industry for certain manufacturers to manage their shipments by offering seasonal terms to qualifying purchasers such as Pool Corporation.  These terms typically allow us to place orders in the fall at a modest discount, take delivery of product during the off-season months and pay for these purchases in the spring or early summer.

Our preferred vendor program encourages our distribution networks to stock and sell products from a smaller number of vendors to optimize profitability and shareholder return.  We also work closely with our vendors to develop programs and services to better meet the needs of our customers and to concentrate our inventory investments.  These practices, together with a more comprehensive service offering, have positively impacted our selling margins and our returns on inventory investments.

We regularly evaluate supplier relationships and consider alternate sourcing to assure competitive cost, service and quality standards.  Our largest suppliers include Pentair Water Pool and Spa, Inc., Hayward Pool Products, Inc. and Zodiac Pool Systems, Inc., which accounted for approximately 20%, 10% and 8%, respectively, of the cost of products we sold in 2016.


6


Competition

We are the largest wholesale distributor of swimming pool and related backyard products (based on industry knowledge and available data) and the only truly national wholesale distributor focused on the swimming pool industry in the United States.  We are also one of the top three distributors of irrigation and landscape products in the United States.  We face intense competition from many regional and local distributors in our markets and from one national wholesale distributor of irrigation and landscape products.  We also face competition, both directly and indirectly, from mass-market retailers and large pool supply retailers (both store-based and internet) who buy directly from manufacturers.

Some geographic markets we serve, particularly the four largest and higher pool density markets of California, Texas, Florida and Arizona, have a greater concentration of competition than others.  Barriers to entry in our industry are relatively low.  We believe that the principal competitive factors in swimming pool and landscape supply distribution are:

the breadth and availability of products offered;
the quality and level of customer service;
the breadth and depth of sales and marketing programs;
consistency and stability of business relationships with customers and suppliers;
competitive product pricing; and
access to commercial credit to finance business working capital.

We believe that we generally compete favorably with respect to each of these factors.

Seasonality and Weather

For a discussion regarding seasonality and weather, see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Seasonality and Quarterly Fluctuations,” of this Form 10-K.

Environmental, Health and Safety Regulations

Our business is subject to regulation under local fire codes and international, federal, state and local environmental and health and safety requirements, including regulation by the Environmental Protection Agency, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the Department of Transportation, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the National Fire Protection Agency and the International Maritime Organization. Most of these requirements govern the packaging, labeling, handling, transportation, storage and sale of chemicals and fertilizers. We store certain types of chemicals and/or fertilizers at each of our sales centers and the storage of these items is strictly regulated by local fire codes. In addition, we sell algaecides and pest control products that are regulated as pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act and various state pesticide laws. These laws primarily relate to labeling, annual registration and licensing.

Employees

We employed approximately 3,900 people at December 31, 2016. Given the seasonal nature of our business, our peak employment period is the summer and, depending on expected sales levels, we add 200 to 500 employees to our work force to meet seasonal demand.

Intellectual Property

We maintain both domestic and foreign registered trademarks and patents, primarily for our Pool Corporation and Pool Systems Pty. Ltd. (PSL) branded products that are important to our current and future business operations. We also own rights to numerous internet domain names.


7


Geographic Areas

The table below presents net sales by geographic region, with international sales translated into U.S. dollars at prevailing exchange rates for the past three fiscal years (in thousands):

 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
United States
 
$
2,354,726

 
$
2,168,802

 
$
2,037,001

International
 
216,077

 
194,337

 
209,561

 
 
$
2,570,803

 
$
2,363,139

 
$
2,246,562


The table below presents net property and equipment by geographic region, with international property and equipment balances translated into U.S. dollars at prevailing exchange rates for the past three fiscal years (in thousands):

 
 
December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
United States
 
$
79,064

 
$
65,885

 
$
51,027

International
 
4,226

 
3,969

 
5,448

 
 
$
83,290

 
$
69,854

 
$
56,475


Available Information

Our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available free of charge on our website at www.poolcorp.com as soon as reasonably practical after we electronically file such reports with, or furnish them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Additionally, we have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the Code) that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, and is available on our website at www.poolcorp.com. Any substantive amendments to the Code, or any waivers granted to any directors or executive officers, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, or principal accounting officer and controller, will be disclosed on our website and remain there for at least 12 months.


Item 1A.  Risk Factors

Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the “Safe Harbor” Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

Our disclosure and analysis in this report contains forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties. Our forward‑looking statements express our current expectations or forecasts of possible future results or events, including projections of earnings and other financial performance measures, statements of management’s expectations regarding our plans and objectives and industry, general economic and other forecasts of trends and other matters. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this filing, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise such statements to reflect new circumstances or unanticipated events as they occur. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historic or current facts and often use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “believe,” “will likely result,” “outlook,” “project,” “should” and other words and expressions of similar meaning. No assurance can be given that the results in any forward-looking statements will be achieved and actual results could be affected by one or more factors, which could cause them to differ materially. For these statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act.


8


Risk Factors

Certain factors that may affect our business and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements include the following:

The demand for our swimming pool, irrigation and related outdoor lifestyle products may be adversely affected by unfavorable economic conditions.

Consumer discretionary spending affects our sales and is impacted by factors outside of our control, including general economic conditions, disposable income levels, consumer confidence and access to credit. In economic downturns, the demand for swimming pool, irrigation and related outdoor lifestyle products may decline, often corresponding with declines in discretionary consumer spending, the growth rate of pool eligible households and swimming pool construction. Maintenance products and repair and certain replacement equipment, which are required to maintain existing swimming pools, currently account for approximately 90% of net sales and gross profits related to our swimming pool business; however the growth of this portion of our business depends on the expansion of the installed pool base and could also be adversely affected by decreases in construction activities, similar to the trends between late 2006 and early 2010. A weak economy may also cause consumers to defer discretionary replacement and refurbish activity. Even in generally favorable economic conditions, severe and/or prolonged downturns in the housing market could have a material adverse impact on our financial performance. Such downturns expose us to certain additional risks, including but not limited to the risk of customer closures or bankruptcies, which could shrink our potential customer base and inhibit our ability to collect on those customers’ receivables.

We believe that homeowners’ access to consumer credit is a critical factor enabling the purchase of new pools and irrigation systems. Between late 2006 and early 2010, the unfavorable economic conditions and downturn in the housing market resulted in significant tightening of credit markets, which limited the ability of consumers to access financing for new swimming pools and irrigation systems. Although we have seen improvement since 2010, tightening consumer credit could cause consumers to not be able to obtain financing for pool, irrigation and related outdoor projects, which could negatively impact our sales of construction-related products.

We are susceptible to adverse weather conditions.

Weather is one of the principal external factors affecting our business. For example, unseasonably late warming trends in the spring or early cooling trends in the fall can shorten the length of the pool season. Also, unseasonably cool weather or extraordinary rainfall during the peak season can decrease swimming pool use, installation and maintenance, as well as irrigation installations and landscape maintenance. These weather conditions adversely affect sales of our products. While warmer weather conditions favorably impact our sales, global warming trends and other significant climate changes can create more variability in the short term or lead to other unfavorable weather conditions that could adversely impact our sales or operations. Drought conditions or water management initiatives may lead to municipal ordinances related to water use restrictions, which could result in decreased pool and irrigation system installations and negatively impact our sales. For a discussion regarding seasonality and weather, see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Seasonality and Quarterly Fluctuations,” of this Form 10-K.

Our distribution business is highly dependent on our ability to maintain favorable relationships with suppliers.

As a distribution company, maintaining favorable relationships with our suppliers is critical to our success. We believe that we add considerable value to the swimming pool and irrigation and landscape supply chains by purchasing products from a large number of manufacturers and distributing the products to a highly fragmented customer base on conditions that are more favorable than these customers could obtain on their own. We believe that we currently enjoy good relationships with our suppliers, who generally offer us competitive pricing, return policies and promotional allowances. However, any failure to maintain favorable relationships with our suppliers could have an adverse effect on our business.

Our largest suppliers are Pentair Water Pool and Spa, Inc., Hayward Pool Products, Inc. and Zodiac Pool Systems, Inc., which accounted for approximately 20%, 10% and 8%, respectively, of the costs of products we sold in 2016. A decision by several suppliers, acting in concert, to sell their products directly to retailers or other end users of their products, bypassing distribution companies like ours, would have an adverse effect on our business. Additionally, the loss of a single significant supplier due to financial failure or a decision to sell exclusively to retailers or end-use consumers could also adversely affect our business.


9


We face intense competition both from within our industry and from other leisure product alternatives.

Within our industry, we directly compete against various regional and local distributors and indirectly, against mass market retailers, large pool or landscape supply retailers and internet retailers as they compete against our customers for the business of pool owners and other end-use customers. Outside of our industry, we compete indirectly with alternative suppliers of big ticket consumer discretionary products, such as boat and motor home distributors, and with other companies who rely on discretionary homeowner expenditures, such as home remodelers. New competitors may emerge as there are low barriers to entry in our industry. Given the density and demand for pool products, some geographic markets that we serve also tend to have a higher concentration of competitors than others, particularly California, Texas, Florida and Arizona. These states encompass our four largest markets and represented approximately 52% of our net sales in 2016.

More aggressive competition by store- and internet-based mass merchants and large pool or landscape supply retailers could adversely affect our sales.
 
Mass market retailers today carry a limited range of, and devote a limited amount of shelf space to, merchandise and products targeted to our industry. Historically, mass market retailers have generally expanded by adding new stores and product breadth, but their product offering of pool and irrigation and landscape related products has remained relatively constant. Should store- and internet-based mass market retailers increase their focus on the pool or irrigation and landscape industries, or increase the breadth of their pool and irrigation and landscape related product offerings, they may become a more significant competitor for our direct customers and end-use consumers which could have an adverse impact on our business. We may face additional competitive pressures if large pool or landscape supply retailers look to expand their customer base to compete more directly within the distribution channel.

We depend on our ability to attract, develop and retain highly qualified personnel.

We consider our employees to be the foundation for our growth and success. As such, our future success depends in large part on our ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel. This includes succession planning related to our executive officers and key management personnel. If we are unable to attract and retain key personnel, our operating results could be adversely affected.

Past growth may not be indicative of future growth.

Historically, we have experienced substantial sales growth through organic market share gains, new sales center openings and acquisitions that have increased our size, scope and geographic distribution. Since the beginning of 2014, we have opened 13 new sales centers (net of sales center consolidations) and we have completed 8 acquisitions consisting of 21 sales centers (net of sales center consolidations within one year of acquisition). While we contemplate continued growth through internal expansion and acquisitions, no assurance can be made as to our ability to:

penetrate new markets;
generate sufficient cash flows to support expansion plans and general operating activities;
obtain financing;
identify appropriate acquisition candidates;
maintain favorable supplier arrangements and relationships; and
identify and divest assets which do not continue to create value consistent with our objectives.

If we do not manage these potential difficulties successfully, our operating results could be adversely affected.

Our business is highly seasonal.

In 2016, we generated approximately 63% of our net sales and 85% of our operating income in the second and third quarters of the year. These quarters represent the peak months of both swimming pool use, installation, remodeling and repair, and landscape installations and maintenance. Our sales are substantially lower during the first and fourth quarters of the year, when we may incur net losses.


10


The nature of our business subjects us to compliance with environmental, health, transportation and safety regulations.

We are subject to regulation under federal, state, local and international environmental, health, transportation and safety requirements, which govern such things as packaging, labeling, handling, transportation, storage and sale of chemicals and fertilizers. For example, we sell algaecides and pest control products that are regulated as pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act and various state pesticide laws. These laws primarily relate to labeling, annual registration and licensing.

Management has processes in place to facilitate and support our compliance with these requirements. However failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties or the imposition of injunctive relief. Moreover, compliance with such laws and regulations in the future could prove to be costly. Although we presently do not expect to incur any capital or other expenditures relating to regulatory matters in amounts that may be material to us, we may be required to make such expenditures in the future. These laws and regulations have changed substantially and rapidly over the last 25 years and we anticipate that there will be continuing changes.

The clear trend in environmental, health, transportation and safety regulations is to place more restrictions and limitations on activities that impact the environment, such as the use and handling of chemicals. Increasingly, strict restrictions and limitations have resulted in higher operating costs for us and it is possible that the costs of compliance with such laws and regulations will continue to increase. We will attempt to anticipate future regulatory requirements that might be imposed and we will plan accordingly to remain in compliance with changing regulations and to minimize the costs of such compliance.

We store chemicals, fertilizers and other combustible materials that involve fire, safety and casualty risks.

We store chemicals and fertilizers, including certain combustibles and oxidizing compounds, at our sales centers. A fire, explosion or flood affecting one of our facilities could give rise to fire, safety and casualty losses and related liability claims. We maintain what we believe is prudent insurance protection. However, we cannot guarantee that our insurance coverage will be adequate to cover future claims that may arise or that we will be able to maintain adequate insurance in the future at rates we consider reasonable. Successful claims for which we are not fully insured may adversely affect our working capital and profitability. In addition, changes in the insurance industry have generally led to higher insurance costs and decreased availability of coverage.

We conduct business internationally, which exposes us to additional risks.

Our international operations, which accounted for 8% of our total net sales in 2016, expose us to certain additional risks, including:

difficulty in staffing international subsidiary operations;
different political and regulatory conditions;
currency fluctuations;
adverse tax consequences; and
dependence on other economies.

For foreign sourced products, we may be subject to certain trade restrictions that would prevent us from obtaining products and there is also a greater risk that we may not be able to access products in a timely and efficient manner. Fluctuations in other factors relating to international trade, such as tariffs, transportation costs and inflation are additional risks for our international operations. 

We depend on a global network of suppliers to source our products. Product quality or safety concerns could negatively impact our sales and expose us to legal claims.

We rely on manufacturers and other suppliers to provide us with the products we sell and distribute. As we increase the number of Pool Corporation and PSL branded products we distribute, our exposure to potential liability claims may increase. The risk of claims may also be greater with respect to products manufactured by third-party suppliers outside the United States, particularly in China. Uncertainties with respect to foreign legal systems may adversely affect us in resolving claims arising from our foreign sourced products. Even if we are successful in defending any claim relating to the products we distribute, claims of this nature could negatively impact customer confidence in our products and our company. 


11


We rely on information technology systems to support our business operations. Any disturbance or breach of our technological infrastructure could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, failure to maintain the security of confidential information could damage our reputation and expose us to litigation.

Information technology supports several aspects of our business, including among others, product sourcing, pricing, customer service, transaction processing, financial reporting, collections and cost management.  Our ability to operate effectively on a day to day basis depends on a solid technological infrastructure, which is inherently susceptible to internal and external threats.  We are vulnerable to interruption by fire, natural disaster, power loss, telecommunication failures, internet failures, security breaches and other catastrophic events. Exposure to various types of cyber-attacks such as malware, computer viruses, worms, or other malicious acts, as well as human error, could also potentially disrupt our operations or result in a significant interruption in the delivery of our goods and services. Advances in computer and software capabilities, encryption technology and other discoveries increase the complexity of our technological environment, including how each interact with our various software platforms, and may delay or hinder our ability to process transactions and compromise the integrity of our data.

We have designed numerous procedures and protocols to mitigate cybersecurity risks. We continually invest in information technology security and update our business continuity plan. However, the failure to maintain security over and prevent unauthorized access to our data, our customers’ personal information, including credit card information, or data belonging to our suppliers, could put us at a competitive disadvantage, result in damage to our reputation and subject us to potential litigation, liability, fines and penalties, resulting in a possible material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

A terrorist attack or the threat of a terrorist attack could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Discretionary spending on leisure product offerings such as ours is generally adversely affected during times of economic or political uncertainty. The potential for terrorist attacks, the national and international responses to terrorist attacks, and other acts of war or hostility could create these types of uncertainties and negatively impact our business for the short or long term in ways that cannot presently be predicted.

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments

None.


12



Item 2.  Properties

We lease the Pool Corporation corporate offices, which consist of approximately 54,800 square feet of office space in Covington, Louisiana, from an entity in which we have a 50% ownership interest. We own three sales center facilities in Florida and one in Texas. We lease all of our other properties and the majority of our leases have three to seven year terms.

As of December 31, 2016, we had 10 leases with remaining terms longer than seven years that expire between 2024 and 2027. Most of our leases contain renewal options, some of which involve rent increases. In addition to minimum rental payments, which are set at competitive rates, certain leases require reimbursement for taxes, maintenance and insurance.

Our sales centers range in size from approximately 2,000 square feet to 60,000 square feet and generally consist of warehouse, counter, display and office space.  Our centralized shipping locations (CSLs) range in size from approximately 103,000 square feet to 185,000 square feet.

We believe that our facilities are well maintained, suitable for our business and occupy sufficient space to meet our operating needs. As part of our normal business, we regularly evaluate sales center performance and site suitability and may relocate a sales center or consolidate two locations if a sales center is redundant in a market, underperforming or otherwise deemed unsuitable. We do not believe that any single lease is material to our operations.

The table below summarizes the changes in our sales centers during the year ended December 31, 2016:

Network
 
12/31/15
 
New
Locations
 
Consolidated
Locations (2)(3)
 
Acquired
Locations
 
12/31/16
SCP
 
161

 
2

 
(1
)
 

 
162

Superior
 
65

 
1

 
(1
)
 

 
65

Horizon
 
60

 

 
(2
)
 
8

 
66

NPT (1)
 
15

 
2

 

 

 
17

Total Domestic
 
301

 
5

 
(4
)
 
8

 
310

SCP International
 
35

 
1

 
(2
)
 

 
34

Total
 
336

 
6

 
(6
)
 
8

 
344


(1) 
In 2014, we identified NPT as a separate network. In addition to the stand-alone NPT sales centers, there are over 80 SCP and Superior locations that have consumer showrooms and serve as stocking locations that feature NPT brand tile and composite finish products.
(2) 
Consolidated sales centers are those locations where we expect to transfer the majority of the existing business to our nearby sales center locations.
(3) 
We consolidated two of these locations near the end of 2016. While these are not in our sales center count at year end, the sales for 2016 are included in our consolidated net sales for the year.


13



The table below identifies the number of sales centers in each state, territory or country by distribution network as of December 31, 2016:
Location
 
SCP
 
Superior
 
Horizon
 
NPT
 
Total
United States
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
California
 
25

 
21

 
17

 
6

 
69

Texas
 
20

 
5

 
17

 
5

 
47

Florida
 
33

 
6

 
4

 
1

 
44

Arizona
 
6

 
6

 
10

 
2

 
24

Georgia
 
6

 
2

 

 
1

 
9

Nevada
 
2

 
3

 
3

 

 
8

Tennessee
 
5

 
3

 

 

 
8

Washington
 
1

 

 
6

 

 
7

Alabama
 
4

 
2

 

 

 
6

New York
 
6

 

 

 

 
6

Louisiana
 
5

 

 

 

 
5

Missouri
 
3

 
1

 

 
1

 
5

New Jersey
 
3

 
2

 

 

 
5

Pennsylvania
 
3

 
1

 

 
1

 
5

Colorado
 
1

 
1

 
2

 

 
4

Illinois
 
3

 
1

 

 

 
4

Indiana
 
2

 
2

 

 

 
4

North Carolina
 
3

 
1

 

 

 
4

Ohio
 
2

 
2

 

 

 
4

Oregon
 
1

 

 
3

 

 
4

South Carolina
 
3

 
1

 

 

 
4

Virginia
 
2

 
1

 
1

 

 
4

Idaho
 
1

 

 
2

 

 
3

Oklahoma
 
2

 
1

 

 

 
3

Arkansas
 
2

 

 

 

 
2

Connecticut
 
2

 

 

 

 
2

Kansas
 
2

 

 

 

 
2

Maryland
 
1

 

 
1

 

 
2

Massachusetts
 
2

 

 

 

 
2

Michigan
 
2

 

 

 

 
2

Minnesota
 
1

 
1

 

 

 
2

Mississippi
 
2

 

 

 

 
2

Hawaii
 
1

 

 

 

 
1

Iowa
 
1

 

 

 

 
1

Kentucky
 

 
1

 

 

 
1

Nebraska
 
1

 

 

 

 
1

New Mexico
 
1

 

 

 

 
1

Puerto Rico
 
1

 

 

 

 
1

Utah
 
1

 

 

 

 
1

Wisconsin
 

 
1

 

 

 
1

Total United States
 
162

 
65

 
66

 
17

 
310

International
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Canada
 
13

 

 

 

 
13

France
 
5

 

 

 

 
5

Australia
 
4

 

 

 

 
4

Mexico
 
3

 

 

 

 
3

Portugal
 
2

 

 

 

 
2

United Kingdom
 
2

 

 

 

 
2

Belgium
 
1

 

 

 

 
1

Colombia
 
1

 

 

 

 
1

Germany
 
1

 

 

 

 
1

Italy
 
1

 

 

 

 
1

Spain
 
1

 

 

 

 
1

Total International
 
34

 

 

 

 
34

Total
 
196

 
65

 
66

 
17

 
344


14



Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are subject to various claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, including product liability, personal injury, commercial, contract and employment matters. While the outcome of any litigation is inherently unpredictable, based on currently available facts we do not believe that the ultimate resolution of any of these matters will have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.


15



PART II.

Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “POOL.”  On February 8, 2017, there were approximately 37,614 holders of record of our common stock.  The table below sets forth the high and low closing sales prices of our common stock as well as dividends declared per common share for each quarter during the last two fiscal years.

 
 
  High
 
  Low
 
 Dividends
 Declared
Fiscal 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
First Quarter
 
$
87.96

 
$
74.37

 
$
0.26

Second Quarter
 
94.03

 
86.68

 
0.31

Third Quarter
 
102.51

 
93.02

 
0.31

Fourth Quarter
 
107.49

 
90.59

 
0.31

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fiscal 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
First Quarter
 
$
70.43

 
$
62.21

 
$
0.22

Second Quarter
 
71.80

 
64.89

 
0.26

Third Quarter
 
72.80

 
66.14

 
0.26

Fourth Quarter
 
84.16

 
72.63

 
0.26


We initiated quarterly dividend payments to our shareholders in the second quarter of 2004 and we have continued payments in each subsequent quarter. Our Board of Directors (our Board) has increased the dividend amount eleven times including in the fourth quarter of 2004, annually in the second quarters of 2005 through 2008 and in the second quarters of 2011 through 2016.  Future dividend payments will be at the discretion of our Board, after considering various factors, including our earnings, capital requirements, financial position, contractual restrictions and other relevant business considerations. For a description of restrictions on dividends in our Credit Facility and Receivables Facility, see Note 5 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,” included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. We cannot assure shareholders or potential investors that dividends will be declared or paid any time in the future if our Board determines that there is a better use of our funds.

Stock Performance Graph

The information included under the caption “Stock Performance Graph” in this Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is not deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 1934 Act) or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the 1934 Act, and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the 1934 Act, except to the extent we specifically incorporate it by reference into such a filing.

The following graph compares the total stockholder return on our common stock for the last five fiscal years with the total return on the S&P MidCap 400 Index and the NASDAQ Index for the same period, in each case assuming the investment of $100 on December 31, 2011 and the reinvestment of all dividends. We believe the S&P MidCap 400 Index includes companies with market capitalizations comparable to ours. Additionally, we chose the S&P MidCap 400 Index for comparison, as opposed to an industry index, because we do not believe that we can reasonably identify a peer group or a published industry or line-of-business index that contains companies in a similar line of business.

16



returnchart2016.jpg

 
 
Base
Period
 
Indexed Returns
Years Ending
Company / Index
 
12/31/11
 
12/31/12
 
12/31/13
 
12/31/14
 
12/31/15
 
12/31/16
Pool Corporation
 
$
100.00

 
$
142.85

 
$
199.03

 
$
220.34

 
$
284.51

 
$
372.10

S&P MidCap 400 Index
 
100.00

 
117.88

 
157.37

 
172.74

 
168.98

 
204.03

NASDAQ Index
 
100.00

 
117.45

 
164.57

 
188.84

 
201.98

 
219.89


Purchases of Equity Securities

The table below summarizes the repurchases of our common stock in the fourth quarter of 2016.

Period
 
Total Number
of Shares Purchased (1)
 
Average
Price
Paid per
Share
 
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plan (2)
 
Maximum Approximate
Dollar Value of Shares
That May Yet be Purchased
Under the Plan (3)
October 1 – October 31, 2016
 
449,600

 
$
93.96

 
449,600

 
$
64,667,024

November 1 – November 30, 2016
 
196,400

 
$
92.12

 
196,400

 
$
46,574,308

December 1 – December 31, 2016
 
1,700

 
$
104.34

 

 
$
46,574,308

Total
 
647,700

 
$
93.43

 
646,000

 
 


(1) 
These shares may include shares of our common stock surrendered to us by employees in order to satisfy minimum tax withholding obligations in connection with certain exercises of employee stock options and/or the exercise price of such options granted under our share-based compensation plans. There were 1,700 shares surrendered for this purpose in the fourth quarter of 2016.
(2) 
In February 2016, our Board authorized an additional $150.0 million under our share repurchase program for the repurchase of shares of our common stock in the open market at prevailing market prices or in privately negotiated transactions.
(3) 
In 2016, we purchased a total of $175.6 million, or 2,028,517 shares, in the open market at an average price of $86.56 per share. As of February 20, 2017, our total authorization remaining was $46.6 million.


17



Item 6.  Selected Financial Data

The table below sets forth selected financial data from the Consolidated Financial Statements. You should read this information in conjunction with the discussions in Item 7 of this Form 10-K and with the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
 
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012 (1)
Statement of Income Data
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net sales
 
$
2,570,803

 
$
2,363,139

 
$
2,246,562

 
$
2,079,700

 
$
1,953,974

Operating income
 
255,859

 
216,222

 
188,870

 
165,486

 
144,869

Net income
 
148,603

 
128,224

 
111,030

 
97,330

 
81,972

Net income attributable to Pool Corporation
 
148,955

 
128,275

 
110,692

 
97,330

 
81,972

Earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Basic
 
$
3.56

 
$
2.98

 
$
2.50

 
$
2.10

 
$
1.75

Diluted
 
$
3.47

 
$
2.90

 
$
2.44

 
$
2.05

 
$
1.71

Cash dividends declared per common share
 
$
1.19

 
$
1.00

 
$
0.85

 
$
0.73

 
$
0.62

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance Sheet Data
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Working capital
 
$
399,337

 
$
356,899

 
$
345,305

 
$
313,843

 
$
295,100

Total assets (2)
 
994,095

 
934,361

 
890,971

 
821,647

 
779,094

Total long-term debt, net, including current portion (2)
 
438,042

 
328,045

 
318,872

 
244,304

 
229,400

Stockholders’ equity
 
205,210

 
255,743

 
244,352

 
286,182

 
281,623

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Base business sales growth (3)
 
7
%
 
5
%
 
7
%
 
6
%
 
7
%
Number of sales centers
 
344

 
336

 
328

 
321
 
312

 
(1) 
In 2012, operating income, net income attributable to Pool Corporation and earnings per share amounts were significantly impacted by a $6.9 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge related to our United Kingdom reporting unit. The impact of this impairment charge on earnings was $0.14 per diluted share.
(2) 
Upon adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) - Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, we now include financing costs, net of accumulated amortization as a component of long-term debt. For comparability across all periods presented on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, we reclassified certain amounts from Other assets, net in prior periods to Long-term debt, net to conform to our 2016 presentation.
(3) 
For a discussion regarding our calculation of base business sales, see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - RESULTS OF OPERATIONS,” of this Form 10-K.

    


18



Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

For a discussion of our base business calculations, see the RESULTS OF OPERATIONS section below.


2016 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW

Financial Results

2016 proved to be a year of excellent results. We attribute solid sales growth and even stronger profit growth to a combination of favorable weather and strong execution.

Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased 9% compared to 2015. Base business sales of 7% accounted for much of this increase. Warmer than average temperatures, especially in the beginning and end of the year, lengthened the 2016 season and benefited sales. Sales were also bolstered by growth in pool remodeling, equipment replacement, commercial products and swimming pool construction.
  
Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased 10% over 2015. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales (gross margin) grew 20 basis points to 28.8% for 2016 compared to 28.6% in 2015. Gross margin for the year benefited from continued improvements in supply chain management and disciplined execution.

Selling and administrative expenses (operating expenses) for 2016 increased 6% from 2015, with base business operating expenses up approximately 4% over last year. The increase in base business operating expenses was primarily due to higher growth-driven labor costs, building rent and freight.

Operating income for the year improved 18% over 2015. Operating income as a percentage of net sales (operating margin) increased to 10.0% in 2016 compared to 9.1% in 2015.

Net income attributable to Pool Corporation increased 16% compared to 2015, while earnings per share was up 20% to $3.47 per diluted share.

Financial Position and Liquidity

Cash provided by operations was $165.4 million in 2016 and exceeded Net income by $16.8 million. Combined with $109.4 million in net proceeds from borrowings, cash from operating activities helped fund the following initiatives:

share repurchases in the open market of $175.6 million;
quarterly cash dividend payments to shareholders, totaling $49.7 million for the year;
net capital expenditures of $34.4 million; and
payments of $19.7 million for acquisitions.

Total net receivables, including pledged receivables, increased 6% compared to December 31, 2015, consistent with sales growth. Our allowance for doubtful accounts was $4.1 million at December 31, 2016 and $4.2 million at December 31, 2015.

Inventory levels grew 2% to $486.1 million at December 31, 2016 compared to $474.3 million at December 31, 2015. Our reserve for inventory obsolescence was $6.5 million at December 31, 2016 compared to $7.0 million at December 31, 2015. Our inventory turns, as calculated on a trailing four quarters basis, were 3.6 times at December 31, 2016 and 3.5 times at December 31, 2015.

Total debt outstanding of $438.0 million at December 31, 2016 increased $110.0 million or 34% compared to December 31, 2015 primarily due to increased share repurchases in 2016.

Current Trends and Outlook

Over the past five years, we estimate the pool industry grew from 2% to 4% per year due to the gradual improvement in remodeling and replacement activity. Improvements in general external market factors in the United States including consumer confidence, employment, housing, consumer financing and economic expansion, largely support our base business growth. We feel these positive external trends have promoted increased consumer spending on higher value products that enhance swimming pools and outdoor living spaces. Our consistent base business sales growth reflects industry growth plus market share gains from existing customers expanding their businesses and our success in newer market initiatives such as hardscapes and commercial pools.

19




While we estimate that new pool construction has increased to approximately 65,000 - 70,000 new units in 2016 from the historically low levels experienced during the economic downturn, construction levels are still down approximately 65% - 70% compared to peak historical levels and down approximately 55% - 60% from what we consider normal levels. Favorable weather plays a role in industry growth by accelerating growth in any given year, while unfavorable weather impedes growth. In 2015 specifically, excessive precipitation impacted our industry in the second quarter; however a mild fall and delayed winter alleviated any contraction in industry growth rates. In 2016, an earlier start to the pool season due to warmer than usual temperatures and overall favorable weather throughout the rest of the year benefited the industry as a whole.

We believe there is potential for continued sales recovery due to the build-up of deferred replacement and remodeling activity over the next several years and our expectation is that the new pool and irrigation construction levels will gradually normalize. Additionally, we believe favorable demographics from an aging population and southern migration are ideal for increased residential investment, especially in outdoor lifestyle products. We expect that market conditions in the United States will continue to improve, enabling further recovery of replacement, remodeling and new construction activity to normalized levels over the next 4 to 7 years. We expect that the industry will realize an annual growth rate of approximately 3% to 6% over this time period. As economic trends indicate that consumer spending has been slowly recovering and that residential construction activities will likely continue to gradually improve, we believe that we are well positioned to take advantage of both the eventual market recovery and the inherent long-term growth opportunities in our industry.

We established our initial outlook for 2017 based on reasonable expectations of organic market share growth, ongoing leverage of infrastructure and continuous process improvements. For 2017, we expect the macroeconomic environment in the United States will be quite similar to 2016. We expect to continue to gain market share through our comprehensive service and product offerings, which we continually diversify through internal sourcing initiatives and expansion into new markets. We also plan to broaden our geographic presence by opening 6 to 8 new sales centers in 2017 and by making selective acquisitions when appropriate opportunities arise.

The following section summarizes our outlook for 2017:

We project base business sales growth of 5% to 7%, impacted by the following factors and assumptions:
assumed normal weather patterns for 2017, which contrasts with the favorable weather experienced in 2016, particularly in the first and fourth quarters;
anticipated continued growth from replacement, remodeling and construction activity;
an overall decrease in customer early buy shipments for the full year, mostly impacting the first quarter of 2017 (projected to bring down sales by 2% to 4% compared to the first quarter of 2016 and shift those sales into the remainder of the year);
one less selling day for the full year for 2017 compared to 2016 due to one less selling day in the third quarter of 2017 (neutral selling days for all other quarters); and
inflationary product cost increases of approximately 1% to 2%.
We expect relatively neutral gross margin trends for the full year, as we believe our sales growth will continue to be weighted toward sales of lower margin discretionary products. Adverse margin impacts should be offset by benefits from our efforts in supply chain management and internal pricing initiatives.
We project operating expenses will grow at approximately half the rate of our gross profit growth, reflecting inflationary increases and incremental costs to support our sales growth expectations.
Excluding the impact from the adoption of new accounting standards, we expect our effective tax rate will be consistent with 2016. Our effective tax rate is dependent upon our results of operations and may change if actual results are different from our current expectations, particularly any significant changes in our geographic mix. Upon adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, we expect our effective tax rate will fluctuate from quarter to quarter, particularly in periods when employees elect to exercise their vested stock options or when restrictions on share-based awards lapse. Based on our comparison of our deferred tax assets for share‑based compensation to the current intrinsic value of the underlying awards, we expect to recognize material income tax benefits in periods when these transactions occur. We recorded excess tax benefits of $7.4 million in stockholders’ equity in 2016. However we expect the income tax benefit in 2017 will be higher based on the closing price of our common stock at December 31, 2016. The adoption of this guidance will also increase our diluted weighted average shares outstanding.

We project that 2017 earnings will range from $3.80 to $4.00 per diluted share, which does not include the expected favorable impact from the adoption of ASU 2016-09. We expect cash provided by operations will approximate net income for fiscal 2017, and subject to additional authorization by our Board of Directors, we anticipate that we will use $100.0 million to $150.0 million in cash for share repurchases.

20




The forward-looking statements in this Current Trends and Outlook section are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including changes in the economy and the housing market, the sensitivity of our business to weather conditions, our ability to maintain favorable relationships with suppliers and manufacturers, competition from other leisure product alternatives and mass merchants, and other risks detailed in Item 1A of this Form 10-K.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

We prepare our Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. Management identifies critical accounting estimates as:

those that require the use of assumptions about matters that are inherently and highly uncertain at the time the estimates are made; and
those for which changes in the estimate or assumptions, or the use of different estimates and assumptions, could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

Management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of our critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board. We believe the following critical accounting estimates require us to make the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts based on an estimate of the losses we will incur if our customers do not make required payments. We perform periodic credit evaluations of our customers and typically do not require collateral. Consistent with industry practices, we generally require payment from our North American customers within 30 days, except for sales under early buy programs for which we provide extended payment terms to qualified customers. The extended terms usually require payments in equal installments in April, May and June or May and June, depending on geographic location. Credit losses have generally been within or better than our expectations.

Similar to our business, our customers’ businesses are seasonal. Sales are lowest in the winter months and our past due accounts receivable balance as a percentage of total receivables generally increases during this time. We provide reserves for uncollectible accounts based on our accounts receivable aging. These reserves range from 0.05% for amounts currently due to up to 100% for specific accounts more than 60 days past due.

At the end of each quarter, we perform a reserve analysis of all accounts with balances greater than $20,000 and more than 60 days past due. Additionally, we perform a separate reserve analysis on the balance of our accounts receivables with emphasis on past due accounts. As we review these past due accounts, we evaluate collectibility based on a combination of factors including:

aging statistics and trends;
customer payment history;
independent credit reports; and
discussions with customers.

During the year, we write off account balances when we have exhausted reasonable collection efforts and determined that the likelihood of collection is remote. These write-offs are charged against our allowance for doubtful accounts. In the past five years, write-offs have averaged approximately 0.07% of net sales annually.  Write-offs as a percentage of net sales approximated 0.07% in 2016, 0.05% in 2015 and 0.10% in 2014. We expect that write-offs will range from 0.05% to 0.10% of net sales in 2017.

At the end of each fiscal year, we prepare a hindsight analysis by comparing the prior year-end allowance for doubtful accounts balance to (i) current year write-offs and (ii) any significantly aged outstanding receivable balances. Based on our hindsight analysis, we concluded that the prior year allowance was within a range of acceptable estimates, but conservative overall as 2016 write-offs came in consistent with our five-year average but lower than previous historical trends. While we slightly lowered our general reserve percentage to account for declining write-offs in recent years, our overall reserve methodology and process for estimating specific reserves remains unchanged.

If the balance of the accounts receivable reserve increased or decreased by 20% at December 31, 2016, pretax income would change by approximately $0.8 million and earnings per share would change by approximately $0.01 per diluted share (based on the number of weighted average diluted shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2016).

21




Inventory Obsolescence

Product inventories represent the largest asset on our balance sheet. Our goal is to manage our inventory such that we minimize stock-outs to provide the highest level of service to our customers. To do this, we maintain at each sales center an adequate inventory of stock keeping units (SKUs) with the highest sales volumes. At the same time, we continuously strive to better manage our slower moving classes of inventory, which are not as critical to our customers and thus, inherently have lower velocity.

We classify products into 13 classes at the sales center level based on sales at each location over the past 12 months (or 36 months for tile and 48 months for parts products). All inventory is included in these classes, except for special order non-stock items that lack a SKU in our system and products with less than 12 months of usage. The table below presents a description of these inventory classes:

Class 0
new products with less than 12 months usage (or 36 months for tile and 48 months for parts products)
 
 
Classes 1-4
highest sales value items, which represent approximately 80% of net sales at the sales center
 
 
Classes 5-12
lower sales value items, which we keep in stock to provide a high level of customer service
 
 
Class 13
products with no sales for the past 12 months at the local sales center level, excluding special order products not yet delivered to the customer
 
 
Null class
non-stock special order items

There is little risk of obsolescence for products in classes 1-4 because products in these classes generally turn quickly. We establish our reserve for inventory obsolescence based on inventory classes 5-13, which we believe represent some exposure to inventory obsolescence, with particular emphasis on SKUs with the least sales over the previous 12 months. The reserve is intended to reflect the value of inventory that we may not be able to sell at a profit. We provide a reserve of 5% for inventory in classes 5-13 and non-stock inventory as determined at the sales center level. We also provide an additional 5% reserve for excess inventory in classes 5-12 and an additional 45% reserve for excess inventory in class 13. We determine excess inventory, which is defined as the amount of inventory on hand in excess of the previous 12 months’ usage, on a company-wide basis.  We also evaluate whether the calculated reserve provides sufficient coverage of the total class 13 inventory.

In evaluating the adequacy of our reserve for inventory obsolescence, we consider a combination of factors including:

the level of inventory in relation to historical sales by product, including inventory usage by class based on product sales at both the sales center and on a company-wide basis;
changes in customer preferences or regulatory requirements;
seasonal fluctuations in inventory levels;
geographic location; and
superseded products and new product offerings.

We periodically adjust our reserve for inventory obsolescence as changes occur in the above-identified factors. At the end of each fiscal year, we prepare a hindsight analysis by comparing the prior year-end obsolescence reserve balance to (i) current year inventory write-offs and (ii) the value of products with no sales for the past 12 months that remain in inventory. Based on our hindsight analysis, we concluded that our prior year reserve was within a range of acceptable estimates and that our reserve methodology is appropriate.

If the balance of our inventory reserve increased or decreased by 20% at December 31, 2016, pretax income would change by approximately $1.3 million and earnings per share would change by approximately $0.02 per diluted share (based on the number of weighted average diluted shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2016).


22



Vendor Programs

Many of our vendor arrangements provide for us to receive specified amounts of consideration when we achieve any of a number of measures.  These measures generally relate to the volume level of purchases from our vendors and may include negotiated pricing arrangements.  We account for vendor programs as vendor incentives, and accordingly as a reduction of the prices of the vendor’s products and therefore a reduction of inventory until we sell the product, at which time we recognize such incentives as a reduction of cost of sales in our income statement.

Throughout the year, we estimate the amount earned based on our estimate of total purchases for the fiscal year relative to the purchase levels that mark our progress toward the attainment of various levels within certain vendor programs. We accrue vendor incentives on a monthly basis using these estimates provided that we determine they are probable and reasonably estimable. Our estimates for annual purchases, future inventory levels and sales of qualifying products are driven by our sales projections, which can be significantly impacted by a number of external factors including weather and changes in economic conditions.  Changes in our purchasing mix also impact our estimates, as program rates can vary depending on our volume of purchases from specific vendors.

We continually revise these estimates throughout the year to reflect actual purchase levels and identifiable trends. As a result, our estimated quarterly vendor incentive accruals may include cumulative catch-up adjustments to reflect any changes in our estimates between reporting periods. These adjustments tend to have a greater impact on gross margin in the fourth quarter since it is our seasonally slowest quarter and because the majority of our vendor arrangements are based on calendar year periods. We update our estimates for these arrangements at year end to reflect actual annual purchase levels. In the first quarter of the subsequent year, we prepare a hindsight analysis by comparing actual vendor credits received to the prior year vendor receivable balances. Based on our hindsight analysis, we concluded that our vendor program estimates were within a range of acceptable estimates and that our estimation methodology is appropriate.

If market conditions were to change, vendors may change the terms of some or all of these programs. Although such changes would not affect the amounts we have recorded related to products already purchased, they may lower or raise our cost for products purchased and sold in future periods.

Income Taxes

We record deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities using currently enacted rates and laws that will be in effect when we expect the differences to reverse.  Due to changing tax laws and state income tax rates, significant judgment is required to estimate the effective tax rate expected to apply to tax differences that are expected to reverse in the future.

As of December 31, 2016, we have not provided for United States income taxes on undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, as we have invested or expect to invest the undistributed earnings indefinitely.  If these earnings are repatriated to the United States in the future, or if we determine that the earnings will be remitted in the foreseeable future, additional tax provisions may be required. Determining the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability on these undistributed earnings is not practicable due to the complexity of tax laws and regulations and the varying circumstances, tax treatments and timing of any future repatriation.
 
We hold, through our wholly owned affiliates, cash balances in the countries in which we operate, including amounts held outside the United States.  Most of the amounts held outside the United States could be repatriated to the United States, but under current law, may be subject to United States federal income taxes, less applicable foreign tax credits. Repatriation of some foreign balances is restricted by local laws including the imposition of withholding taxes in some jurisdictions. Historically our foreign locations have not generated adequate earnings to both repatriate to the United States and fund foreign operations. Those historical and future foreign earnings will remain permanently reinvested and be used to support our foreign operations and pay non-U.S. obligations.

We have operations in 39 states, 1 United States territory and 11 foreign countries. The amount of income taxes we pay is subject to adjustment by the applicable tax authorities.  We are subject to regular audits by federal, state and foreign tax authorities.   We recognize a benefit from an uncertain tax position only after determining it is more likely than not that the tax position will withstand examination by the applicable taxing authority. Our estimate for the potential outcome of any uncertain tax issue is highly judgmental. We regularly evaluate our tax positions and incorporate these expectations into our reserve estimates. We believe we have adequately provided for any reasonably foreseeable outcome related to these matters.  However, our future results may include favorable or unfavorable adjustments to our estimated tax liabilities in the period the assessments are made or resolved, or when statutes of limitation on potential assessments expire.  These adjustments may include changes in valuation allowances that we have established.  As a result of these uncertainties, our total income tax provision may fluctuate on a quarterly basis.

23




Each year, we prepare a return to provision analysis upon filing our income tax returns. Based on this hindsight analysis, we concluded that our prior year income tax provision was within a range of acceptable estimates and that our provision calculation methodology is appropriate. Differences between our effective income tax rate and federal and state statutory tax rates are primarily due to valuation allowances recorded for certain of our international subsidiaries with tax losses.

Performance-Based Compensation Accrual

The Compensation Committee of our Board (Compensation Committee) annually reviews our compensation structure to oversee management’s implementation of maintaining a program that attracts, retains, develops and motivates employees without leading to unnecessary risk taking. Our compensation packages include bonus plans that are specific to each group of eligible participants and their levels and areas of responsibility. The majority of our bonus plans have annual cash payments that are based primarily on objective performance criteria. We calculate bonuses based on the achievement of certain key measurable financial and operational results, including operating income and diluted earnings per share (EPS).

We use an annual cash performance award (annual bonus) to focus corporate behavior on short-term goals for growth, financial performance and other specific financial and business improvement metrics. Management sets the Company’s annual bonus objectives at the beginning of the bonus plan year using both historical information and forecasted results of operations for the current plan year. Management also establishes specific business improvement objectives for both our operating units and corporate employees. The Compensation Committee approves objectives for bonus plans involving executive management.

We also utilize our medium-term (three-year) Strategic Plan Incentive Program (SPIP) to provide senior management with an additional cash-based, pay-for-performance award based upon the achievement of specified earnings growth objectives. Payouts through the SPIP are based on three-year compounded annual growth rates (CAGRs) of our diluted EPS.

We record annual performance-based compensation accruals based on positive operating income achieved in a quarter as a percentage of total expected operating income for the year. We estimate total expected operating income for the current plan year using management’s estimate of the total overall incentives earned per the stated bonus plan objectives. Starting in June, and continuing each quarter through our fiscal year end, we adjust our estimated performance-based compensation accrual based on our detailed analysis of each bonus plan, the participants’ progress toward achievement of their specific objectives and management’s estimates related to the discretionary components of the bonus plans, if any.

We record SPIP accruals based on our total expected EPS for the current fiscal year and CAGR estimates for the succeeding two years. We base our current fiscal year estimates on the same assumptions used for our annual bonus calculation and our CAGR estimates on historical growth rates and projections for the remainder of the three-year performance periods.

Our quarterly performance-based compensation expense and accrual balances may vary relative to actual annual bonus expense and payouts due to the following:

differences between estimated and actual performance;
our projections related to achievement of multiple-year performance objectives for our SPIP; and
the discretionary components of the bonus plans.

We generally make bonus payments at the end of February following the most recently completed fiscal year. Each year, we compare the actual bonus payouts to amounts accrued at the previous year end to determine the accuracy of our performance-based compensation estimates. Based on our hindsight analysis, we concluded that our performance-based compensation accrual balances were within a reasonable range of acceptable estimates and that our estimation methodologies are appropriate.

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets

Goodwill is our largest intangible asset. At December 31, 2016, our goodwill balance was $184.8 million, representing approximately 19% of total assets. Goodwill represents the excess of the amount we paid to acquire a company over the estimated fair value of tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets acquired, less liabilities assumed.

We perform our goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarter of each year or on a more frequent basis if events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate potential impairment.  If the estimated fair value of any of our reporting units falls below its carrying value, we compare the estimated fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill to its carrying value. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its estimated fair value, we recognize the difference as an impairment loss in operating income.


24



Since we define an operating segment as an individual sales center and we do not have operations below the sales center level, our reporting unit is an individual sales center.  As of October 1, 2016, we had 222 reporting units with allocated goodwill balances. The highest goodwill balance was $5.7 million and the average goodwill balance was $0.8 million. In October 2016, 2015 and 2014, we performed our annual goodwill impairment test and did not identify any goodwill impairment at the reporting unit level. In the third quarter of 2016, we recorded a $0.6 million goodwill impairment charge related to an at-risk reporting unit in Quebec, Canada. We have been monitoring this location’s results, which came in below expectations at the end of the 2016 pool season. As of December 31, 2016, the remaining goodwill balance for this reporting unit was $1.7 million.

We estimate the fair value of our reporting units based on an income approach that incorporates our assumptions for determining the present value of future cash flows.  We project future cash flows using management’s assumptions for sales growth rates, operating margins, discount rates and multiples. These estimates can significantly affect the outcome of our impairment test. To determine the reasonableness of the assumptions included in our fair value estimates, we compare the total estimated fair value for all aggregated reporting units to our market capitalization on the date of our impairment test.  We also review for potential impairment indicators at the reporting unit level based on an evaluation of recent historical operating trends, current and projected local market conditions and other relevant factors as appropriate.

To test the reasonableness of our fair value estimates, we compared our aggregate estimated fair values to our market capitalization as of the date of our annual impairment test. We expect that a reasonable fair value estimate would reflect a moderate acquisition premium. Our aggregate estimated fair values fell below our market capitalization, which we consider to be conservative, but reasonable for the purpose of our goodwill impairment test. To facilitate a sensitivity analysis, we reduced our consolidated fair value estimate by 5% to reflect more conservative projected cash flow assumptions, a 50 basis point increase in our estimated weighted average cost of capital or a 50 basis point decrease in the estimated perpetuity growth rate. Our sensitivity analysis generated a fair value estimate significantly below our market capitalization and resulted in the identification of no goodwill impairments and no additional at-risk locations.
  
Based on the magnitude of its goodwill balance and the continued economic challenges in Italy, we currently consider our Italy reporting unit as at risk for goodwill impairment. Our most sensitive estimates pertain to this reporting unit’s product mix and the related impact on our gross margin projections, which are incorporated into our discounted cash flow assumptions. As of December 31, 2016, our at-risk reporting unit in Italy had a goodwill balance of $3.3 million. We also consider our reporting units in Quebec, Canada, as at risk for goodwill impairment. Results in Quebec began to fall below expectations in 2013, largely due to its heightened sensitivity to weather and certain execution challenges. We cannot be assured of favorable weather conditions in any given year, which strongly impact results for our Quebec reporting units. As of December 31, 2016, we have three reporting units in Quebec, with an aggregate goodwill balance of $2.6 million.

If our assumptions or estimates in our fair value calculations change or if operating results are less than forecasted, we could incur additional impairment charges in future periods, especially related to the reporting units discussed above.  Impairment charges would decrease operating income, negatively impact diluted EPS and result in lower asset values on our balance sheet.  

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASU 2014-09). The FASB also issued subsequent amendments to ASU 2014-09 to provide clarification on the guidance. ASU 2014-09 will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, which for us will be in the period beginning January 1, 2018. We are continuing to perform our detailed evaluation, using a five-step model specified in the guidance, to assess the impacts of the new standard.

Under the new standard, revenue will be recognized when we satisfy our performance obligation by transferring promised goods or services to our customer. The standard allows for application of the guidance to a portfolio of contracts or performance obligations with similar characteristics. Since our individual sales transactions are very similar in nature, we anticipate applying the guidance to all transactions as a portfolio. We expect that the effects of applying this guidance to the portfolio would not differ materially from applying the guidance to individual performance obligations within that portfolio.
Our revenue recognition will be achieved upon delivery of goods as there are no other promised services as part of our contracts with customers. Because shipping and handling activities are performed before the customer obtains control of the goods, we do not consider these activities to be a promised service to the customer. Rather shipping and handling are activities to fulfill our promise to transfer the goods. Product warranties do not constitute a performance obligation for us, as products are warrantied directly by the manufacturer.
To determine the amount of consideration which we expect to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods, we will consider if variable consideration exists. We will consider the terms of the contract and our customary business

25



practices to determine the transaction price. We have reviewed our pricing policies and strategies including marketing, loyalty and incentive programs for the purpose of determining whether we have any variable or non-cash consideration. No material items were noted. In addition, we will review our current accounting policies related to returns, price concessions and volume discounts. We will continue our accounting policy election to exclude from revenue all amounts we collect and remit to governmental authorities.
The majority of our sales transactions do not require any additional performance obligation after delivery, therefore we do not have multiple performance obligations for which we will have to allocate the transaction price.
We expect to recognize revenue upon delivery to the customer as our performance obligation will be satisfied at that point in time.

We expect to apply the guidance using the cumulative-effect transition method. Based on our analysis performed to date, we do not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations but will result in additional disclosures regarding our revenue recognition policies.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory, which requires entities to measure inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value rather than at the lower of cost or market. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. ASU 2015-11 will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. We have not elected to early adopt this guidance. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-11 will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations and related disclosures.

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments, which eliminates the requirement that an acquirer in a business combination account for measurement-period adjustments retrospectively. Instead, an acquirer will recognize a measurement-period adjustment during the period in which it determines the amount of the adjustment. ASU 2015-16 will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. We have not elected to early adopt this guidance. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-16 will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations and related disclosures.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which requires companies to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent on the balance sheet rather than separately presenting net deferred tax assets or liabilities as current or noncurrent. Also, companies will no longer allocate valuation allowances between current and noncurrent deferred tax assets because those allowances also will be classified as noncurrent. ASU 2015-17 will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. We have not elected to early adopt this guidance. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-17 will have an impact on our results of operations, but it will change the presentation of our financial position and disclosures related to deferred tax assets and liabilities.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which requires lessees to record most leases on their balance sheets but recognize expenses in a manner similar to current guidance. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The guidance is required to be applied using a modified retrospective approach. We are currently evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-02 will have on our financial position, results of operations and related disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which amends several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. This guidance requires all excess tax benefits or deficiencies to be recognized as income tax benefit or expense in the income statement, and all excess tax benefits to be classified with other income tax cash flows as operating activities. This portion of the amendment should be applied prospectively. The guidance also changes the timing of when excess tax benefits are recognized and the methods available to an entity to estimate the impact of forfeitures related to share-based awards. These two amendment topics should be applied using a modified retrospective transition method, and would require recognition of cumulative-effect adjustments to equity as of the beginning of the period in which the guidance is adopted. The guidance also classifies cash paid by an employer when directly withholding shares for tax-withholding purposes as a financing activity on the statement of cash flows. This portion of the amendment should be applied retrospectively. ASU 2016-09 will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period, but we are not early adopting this guidance. The adoption of this guidance will likely have a material positive impact on our income tax provision, net income and operating cash flows in periods in which employees elect to exercise their vested stock options or when restrictions on share-based awards lapse (based on our comparison of our deferred tax assets for share-based compensation to the current intrinsic value of the underlying awards).


26



In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses - Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which changes the way companies evaluate credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments. For trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans and other instruments, entities will be required to use a new forward-looking “expected loss” model to evaluate impairment, potentially resulting in earlier recognition of allowances for losses. The new standard also requires enhanced disclosures, including the requirement to disclose the information used to track credit quality by year of origination for most financing receivables. ASU 2016-13 will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for all entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. We have not elected to early adopt this guidance. The guidance must be applied using a cumulative-effect transition method. We are currently evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-13 will have on our financial position, results of operations and related disclosures.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which may change the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments on an entity’s statement of cash flows. The new guidance specifies how cash flows should be classified for debt prepayment or extinguishment costs, settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds for the settlement of insurance claims, proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance, distributions from equity method investees and beneficial interests in securitization transactions. Current guidance for these topics is principles-based, requiring judgment in application and creating diversity in practice. ASU 2016-15 will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and must be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted for all entities. We have not elected to early adopt this guidance. We are currently evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-15 will have on our financial position and related disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill to measure a goodwill impairment charge (commonly referred to as Step 2 under the current guidance). Rather, the measurement of a goodwill impairment charge will be based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying value over its fair value (Step 1 under the current guidance). ASU 2017-04 will be effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed in periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and should be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests beginning after January 1, 2017. We are currently evaluating the effect that ASU 2017-04 will have on our financial position, results of operations and related disclosures.






27



RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The table below summarizes information derived from our Consolidated Statements of Income expressed as a percentage of net sales for the past three fiscal years:

 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Net sales
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
Cost of sales
 
71.2

 
71.4

 
71.4

Gross profit
 
28.8

 
28.6

 
28.6

Operating expenses
 
18.9

 
19.4

 
20.2

Operating income
 
10.0

 
9.1

 
8.4

Interest and other non-operating expenses, net
 
0.6

 
0.3

 
0.3

Income before income taxes and equity earnings
 
9.4
%
 
8.8
%
 
8.1
%

Note: Due to rounding, percentages may not add to operating income or income before income taxes and equity earnings.

Our discussion of consolidated operating results includes the operating results from acquisitions in 2016, 2015 and 2014.  We have included the results of operations in our consolidated results since the respective acquisition dates.

Fiscal Year 2016 compared to Fiscal Year 2015

The following table breaks out our consolidated results into the base business component and the excluded components (sales centers excluded from base business):

(Unaudited)
 
Base Business
 
Excluded
 
Total
(in thousands)
 
Year Ended
 
Year Ended
 
Year Ended
 
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Net sales
 
$
2,525,164

 
$
2,361,134

 
$
45,639

 
$
2,005

 
$
2,570,803

 
$
2,363,139

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross profit
 
727,469

 
675,262

 
13,618

 
382

 
741,087

 
675,644

Gross margin
 
28.8
%
 
28.6
%
 
29.8
%
 
19.1
 %
 
28.8
%
 
28.6
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating expenses
 
475,048

 
458,599

 
10,180

 
823

 
485,228

 
459,422

Expenses as a % of net sales
 
18.8
%
 
19.4
%
 
22.3
%
 
41.0
 %
 
18.9
%
 
19.4
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating income (loss)
 
252,421

 
216,663

 
3,438

 
(441
)
 
255,859

 
216,222

Operating margin
 
10.0
%
 
9.2
%
 
7.5
%
 
(22.0
)%
 
10.0
%
 
9.1
%


28



We have excluded the following acquisitions from base business for the periods identified:



Acquired (1)
 

Acquisition
Date
 
Net
Sales Centers
Acquired
 

Periods
Excluded
Metro Irrigation Supply Company Ltd.
 
April 2016
 
8
 
April - December 2016
The Melton Corporation
 
November 2015
 
2
 
January - December 2016 and November - December 2015
Seaboard Industries, Inc.
 
October 2015
 
3
 
January - December 2016 and November - December 2015
Poolwerx Development LLC
 
April 2015
 
1
 
January - June 2016 and
April - June 2015
St. Louis Hardscape Material & Supply, LLC
 
December 2014
 
1
 
January - March 2016 and January - March 2015

(1) 
We acquired certain distribution assets of each of these companies.

When calculating our base business results, we exclude sales centers that are acquired, closed or opened in new markets for a period of 15 months. We also exclude consolidated sales centers when we do not expect to maintain the majority of the existing business and existing sales centers that are consolidated with acquired sales centers.

We generally allocate corporate overhead expenses to excluded sales centers on the basis of their net sales as a percentage of total net sales.  After 15 months of operations, we include acquired, consolidated and new market sales centers in the base business calculation including the comparative prior year period.

The table below summarizes the changes in our sales centers during 2016:

December 31, 2015
336

Acquired
8

New locations
6

Consolidated locations
(6
)
December 31, 2016
344


For information about our recent acquisitions, see Note 2 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,” included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.


29



Net Sales

(in millions)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
  
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
Change
Net sales
 
$
2,570.8

 
$
2,363.1

 
$
207.7

 
9%

Net sales increased 9% compared to 2015, with the 7% improvement in base business sales contributing much of this increase. Strong execution, combined with overall favorable weather conditions and generally favorable economic and industry conditions supported our sales growth.

The following factors benefited our sales growth (listed in order of estimated magnitude):

very favorable weather conditions, including the second warmest year on record in the continental United States;
continued consumer investments in enhancing outdoor living spaces, as evidenced by improvements in sales growth rates for product offerings such as building materials and equipment (see discussion below);
pool and spa chemical sales, our largest product category at 13% of total net sales, increased 6% over last year; and
inflationary (estimated at 1% to 2%) product cost increases.

We believe that sales growth rates for certain product offerings, such as building materials and equipment, support our assertion that there continues to be increased spending in traditionally discretionary areas including pool construction, pool remodeling, as well as equipment upgrades. Sales of equipment such as swimming pool heaters, pumps, and lights, which represented 8%, 7%, and 7% of our total net sales, respectively, increased collectively by 9% compared to 2015. This increase reflects both the gradual recovery of replacement activity and increased demand for higher-priced, more energy-efficient products. Sales of building materials, which includes tile, represent just over 9% of net sales for 2016 and grew by 14% compared to 2015.

Sales to customers who service large commercial installations such as hotels, universities and community recreational facilities are included in the appropriate existing product categories and growth in this area is reflected in the numbers above. These sales represented 4% of our consolidated net sales for 2016 and increased 16% compared to 2015 due primarily to our increased focus on the commercial market, as well as greater resources assigned to this area, including designated warehouse space, increased staffing and additional vendor relationships.

In terms of quarterly performance, base business sales increased 13% in the first quarter of 2016, as warmer than normal weather across our seasonal markets kicked off 2016, allowing for accelerated pool openings and increased ability for customers to perform remodel, replacement and new construction activity earlier in the year. As we have disclosed in recent years, 2016 customer early buy shipments again caused some second quarter sales to shift into the first quarter and accounted for approximately 3% of our first quarter 2016 sales growth. Neutral weather conditions in the second and third quarters coupled with strong execution contributed to our 6% and 5% base business sales growth in the second and third quarter of 2016, respectively. For our seasonally slow fourth quarter, base business sales increased 5% in 2016 over very strong fourth quarter 2015 results, as our sales benefited from warmer than average temperatures during this time period. See discussion of significant weather impacts under the subheading Seasonality and Quarterly Fluctuations below.

Gross Profit

(in millions)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
  
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
Change
Gross profit
 
$
741.1

 
$
675.6

 
$
65.5

 
10%
Gross margin
 
28.8
%
 
28.6
%
 
 
 
 

Gross margin for 2016 increased approximately 20 basis points over 2015, and benefited from improvements in supply chain management and internal initiatives, as well as favorable product mix from pool openings earlier in the year. These favorable impacts were partially offset by an increase in customer early buy deliveries as these sales include applicable discounts. Quarterly gross margin comparisons varied throughout the year, with an increase of 10 basis points in the first quarter, which reflects the impact of customer early buy shipments. Gross margin increased 40 basis points in both the second and third quarters and increased 20 basis points in the seasonally slower fourth quarter.


30



Operating Expenses

(in millions)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
Change
Operating expenses
 
$
485.2

 
$
459.4

 
$
25.8

 
6%
Operating expenses as a percentage of net sales
 
18.9
%
 
19.4
%
 
 
 
 

Operating expenses increased 6% compared to 2015, with base business operating expenses up 4%. While the increase in total operating expenses includes expenses from our more recent acquisitions, the increase in base business operating expenses was due primarily to higher growth-driven labor, building rent and freight expenses. Focusing on efficiencies and leveraging existing infrastructure enabled us to reduce operating expenses as a percentage of sales.

Interest and Other Non-operating Expenses, net

Interest and other non-operating expenses, net increased $6.4 million compared to 2015. This increase includes $3.5 million related to a non-operating note receivable. The remaining component is primarily interest expense on debt, which increased $3.2 million over last year. Average outstanding debt was $424.6 million for 2016 versus $379.2 million for 2015. Our 2016 average outstanding debt balance reflects greater share repurchases than in 2015. Our weighted average effective interest rate increased to 2.2% for 2016 compared to 1.9% for 2015.

Income Taxes

Our effective income tax rate was 38.5% at both December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

Net Income and Earnings Per Share

Net income attributable to Pool Corporation increased 16% to $149.0 million in 2016 compared to $128.3 million in 2015, while earnings per share increased 20% to $3.47 per diluted share compared to $2.90 per diluted share in 2015.





31



Fiscal Year 2015 compared to Fiscal Year 2014

The following table breaks out our consolidated results into the base business component and the excluded components (sales centers excluded from base business):

(Unaudited)
 
Base Business
 
Excluded
 
Total
(in thousands)
 
Year Ended
 
Year Ended
 
Year Ended
 
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Net sales
 
$
2,344,410

 
$
2,238,929

 
$
18,729

 
$
7,633

 
$
2,363,139

 
$
2,246,562

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross profit
 
669,037

 
640,259

 
6,607

 
3,081

 
675,644

 
643,340

Gross margin
 
28.5
%
 
28.6
%
 
35.3
 %
 
40.4
%
 
28.6
%
 
28.6
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating expenses
 
451,383

 
451,882

 
8,039

 
2,588

 
459,422

 
454,470

Expenses as a % of net sales
 
19.3
%
 
20.2
%
 
42.9
 %
 
33.9
%
 
19.4
%
 
20.2
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating income (loss)
 
217,654

 
188,377

 
(1,432
)
 
493

 
216,222

 
188,870

Operating margin
 
9.3
%
 
8.4
%
 
(7.6
)%
 
6.5
%
 
9.1
%
 
8.4
%

For an explanation of how we calculate base business, please refer to the discussion of base business above under the heading “Fiscal Year 2016 compared to Fiscal Year 2015.”

For purposes of comparing operating results for the year ended December 31, 2015 to the year ended December 31, 2014, we excluded acquired sales centers from base business for the periods identified in the table below.



Acquired
 

Acquisition
Date
 
Net
Sales Centers
Acquired
 

Periods
Excluded
The Melton Corporation (1)
 
November 2015
 
2
 
November - December 2015
Seaboard Industries, Inc. (1)
 
October 2015
 
3
 
November - December 2015
Poolwerx Development LLC (1)
 
April 2015
 
1
 
April - December 2015
St. Louis Hardscape Material & Supply, LLC (1)(2)
 
December 2014
 
1
 
January - December 2015 and December 2014
Pool Systems Pty. Ltd.
 
July 2014
 
3
 
January - October 2015 and August - October 2014
DFW Stone Supply, LLC (1)
 
March 2014
 
2
 
January - May 2015 and March - May 2014
Atlantic Chemical & Aquatics Inc. (1)
 
February 2014
 
2
 
January - April 2015 and February - April 2014

(1) 
We acquired certain distribution assets of each of these companies.
(2) 
We completed this acquisition on December 31, 2014. We excluded this sales center from base business for the period identified as per our definition of base business, but also because no results of operations are included in fiscal 2014 due to the acquisition date. This sales center is not in our sales center count as of December 31, 2014, but is included in the table below as an acquired location during fiscal 2015.



32



The table below summarizes the changes in our sales centers during 2015:

December 31, 2014
328

Acquired
7

New locations
4

Consolidated locations
(3
)
December 31, 2015
336


For information about our recent acquisitions, see Note 2 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,” included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Net Sales

(in millions)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
  
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
Change
Net sales
 
$
2,363.1

 
$
2,246.6

 
$
116.5

 
5%

Net sales increased 5% compared to 2014, including a 5% increase in base business sales. The sustained strength of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies adversely impacted our consolidated sales growth rate by close to 2% during 2015. After sales exhibited a strong start in the first quarter, adverse weather conditions in the second quarter negatively impacted sales in several important markets. Weather conditions normalized in the back half of the year, extending the season in certain markets and leading to year over year sales growth. A continued gradual recovery of demand for discretionary replacement and remodel products and increased market share were the primary contributors to our sales growth in 2015.

The following factors benefited our sales growth in 2015 (listed in order of estimated magnitude):

continued improvement in consumer discretionary expenditures, including some market recovery in remodeling and replacement activity, as evidenced by sales growth rates for product offerings such as building materials and equipment (see discussion below);
market share growth, primarily in building materials and complementary product categories;
an extended pool season in certain markets, with above average temperatures through much of the fourth quarter; and
inflationary (estimated at less than 1%) product cost increases.

The following factors adversely impacted our sales growth (listed in order of estimated magnitude):

the strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to most foreign currencies (estimated 2% impact); and
record rainfall in Texas and adjacent states in the second quarter, which delayed construction projects and reduced spending on related discretionary products.

Sales of building materials grew by 13% compared to 2014. Our continued strong growth in building materials primarily reflects market share growth with our expansion of stocking locations and broader product offerings as well as the partial recovery in pool remodeling. Sales of equipment, which includes heaters, pumps and filters, increased by 9% compared to 2014. Chemical sales increased by approximately 5%.

In terms of quarterly performance, base business sales increased 10% in the first quarter of 2015. Similar to 2014, our 2015 customer early buy shipments caused some second quarter sales to shift into the first quarter and accounted for approximately 3% of our first quarter 2015 sales growth. As discussed above, adverse weather conditions in the second quarter led to flat base business sales growth trends in the second quarter of 2015 compared to 2014. Normalized weather trends allowed us to generate 5% base business sales growth in the third quarter of 2015. For our seasonally slow fourth quarter, base business sales increased 10% in 2015, as our sales benefited from record warm temperatures during this time period. See discussion of significant weather impacts under the subheading Seasonality and Quarterly Fluctuations below.


33



Gross Profit

(in millions)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
  
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
Change
Gross profit
 
$
675.6

 
$
643.3

 
$
32.3

 
5%
Gross margin
 
28.6
%
 
28.6
%
 
 
 
 

Gross margin for 2015 remained consistent with 2014. Throughout the year, gross margin comparisons varied, with a decline of 40 basis points in the first quarter, due to the impact of customer early buy shipments. Gross margin remained flat in the second quarter, declined 10 basis points in the third quarter and increased 30 basis points in the fourth quarter.

Operating Expenses

(in millions)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
Change
Operating expenses
 
$
459.4

 
$
454.5

 
$
4.9

 
1%
Operating expenses as a percentage of net sales
 
19.4
%
 
20.2
%
 
 
 
 

Operating expenses increased 1% compared to 2014. Increases in performance-based incentive compensation and technology related expenses were offset by tight expense controls, lower freight costs and an approximate 2% favorable impact on operating expenses from the stronger U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies.

Interest and Other Non-operating Expenses, net

Interest and other non-operating expenses, net increased 8% compared to 2014. The primary component is interest expense on debt, which increased 6% over 2014. Average outstanding debt was $379.2 million for 2015 versus $342.9 million for 2014. Our weighted average effective interest rate was 1.9% for both 2015 and 2014.

Income Taxes

Our effective income tax rate was 38.5% at December 31, 2015 compared to 38.9% at December 31, 2014. The decline in our effective income tax rate was primarily a result of improved performance by our international entities in 2015.

Net Income and Earnings Per Share

Net income attributable to Pool Corporation increased 16% to $128.3 million in 2015 compared to $110.7 million in 2014, while earnings per share increased 19% to $2.90 per diluted share compared to $2.44 per diluted share in 2014.








34



Seasonality and Quarterly Fluctuations

Our business is highly seasonal. In general, sales and operating income are highest during the second and third quarters, which represent the peak months of both swimming pool use and installation and landscape installations and maintenance. Sales are substantially lower during the first and fourth quarters, when we may incur net losses. In 2016, we generated approximately 63% of our net sales and 85% of our operating income in the second and third quarters of the year.

We typically experience a build-up of product inventories and accounts payable during the winter months in anticipation of the peak selling season.  Excluding borrowings to finance acquisitions and share repurchases, our peak borrowing usually occurs during the second quarter, primarily because extended payment terms offered by our suppliers typically are payable in April, May and June, while our peak accounts receivable collections typically occur in June, July and August.

The following table presents certain unaudited quarterly data for 2016 and 2015. We have included income statement and balance sheet data for the most recent eight quarters to allow for a meaningful comparison of the seasonal fluctuations in these amounts. In our opinion, this information reflects all normal and recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of this data. Due to the seasonal nature of our industry, the results of any one or more quarters are not necessarily a good indication of results for an entire fiscal year or of continuing trends.

(Unaudited)
 
QUARTER
(in thousands)
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
First
 
Second
 
Third
 
Fourth
 
First
 
Second
 
Third
 
Fourth
Statement of Income Data
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net sales
 
$
515,250

 
$
918,889

 
$
691,429

 
$
445,235

 
$
450,430

 
$
851,855

 
$
645,779

 
$
415,075

Gross profit
 
143,023

 
270,736

 
199,551

 
127,777

 
124,801

 
248,260

 
184,288

 
118,295

Operating income
 
29,530

 
142,420

 
74,166

 
9,743

 
15,599

 
129,132

 
65,512

 
5,979

Net income
 
16,363

 
85,247

 
44,421

 
2,572

 
8,433

 
77,809

 
39,403

 
2,579

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net sales as a % of annual net sales
 
20
%
 
36
%
 
27
%
 
17
%
 
19
%
 
36
%
 
27
%
 
18
%
Gross profit as a % of annual gross profit
 
19
%
 
37
%
 
27
%
 
17
%
 
18
%
 
37
%
 
27
%
 
18
%
Operating income as a % of annual operating income
 
12
%
 
56
%
 
29
%
 
4
%
 
7
%
 
60
%
 
30
%
 
3
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance Sheet Data
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total receivables, net
 
$
283,758

 
$
351,012

 
$
233,405

 
$
166,151

 
$
238,727

 
$
318,498

 
$
219,774

 
$
156,756

Product inventories, net
 
595,393

 
493,254

 
455,156

 
486,116

 
559,260

 
473,362

 
412,587

 
474,275

Accounts payable
 
438,705

 
265,349

 
199,922

 
230,728

 
375,995

 
236,868

 
170,582

 
246,554

Total debt (1)
 
450,457

 
500,606

 
390,189

 
438,042

 
392,749

 
493,580

 
393,370

 
328,045

 
Note:  Due to rounding, the sum of quarterly percentage amounts may not equal 100%.

(1) 
For all periods presented, total debt balances have been adjusted to reflect our adoption of ASU 2015-03. For additional information, see Note 1 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,” included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
 
We expect that our quarterly results of operations will continue to fluctuate depending on the timing and amount of revenue contributed by new and acquired sales centers.  Based on our peak summer selling season, we generally open new sales centers and close or consolidate sales centers, when warranted, either in the first quarter before the peak selling season begins or in the fourth quarter after the peak selling season ends.


35



Weather is one of the principal external factors affecting our business. The table below presents some of the possible effects resulting from various weather conditions.

Weather
 
Possible Effects
Hot and dry
Increased purchases of chemicals and supplies
 
 
for existing swimming pools
 
Increased purchases of above-ground pools and
 
 
irrigation products
 
 
 
Unseasonably cool weather or
Fewer pool and irrigation installations
extraordinary amounts of rain
Decreased purchases of chemicals and supplies
 
Decreased purchases of impulse items such as
 
 
above-ground pools and accessories
 
 
 
Unseasonably early warming trends in spring/late cooling trends in fall
A longer pool and landscape season, thus positively impacting our sales
(primarily in the northern half of the U.S. and Canada)
 
 
 
 
 
Unseasonably late warming trends in spring/early cooling trends in fall
A shorter pool and landscape season, thus negatively impacting our sales
(primarily in the northern half of the U.S. and Canada)
 
 

Weather Impacts on Fiscal Year 2016 to Fiscal Year 2015 Comparisons

Warmer than normal weather across nearly all markets in the United States benefited our first quarter of 2016 sales growth. Warmer weather early in the season accelerates pool openings and allows for increased purchases of chemicals and maintenance supplies for existing pools. By comparison, our year-round markets experienced similar favorable weather conditions in the first quarter of 2015, while our seasonal markets, particularly in the northeast United States and eastern Canada, experienced cooler than normal temperatures. The unusually early warm weather in the first quarter of 2016 in our seasonal markets benefited our first quarter sales. Growth in our California markets in the first quarter of 2016 was impacted by unfavorable weather comparisons to the same period of 2015 due to higher winter precipitation and average temperatures in 2016 versus record warm temperatures in 2015.

In the second quarter of 2016, the Midwest and Northeast experienced more favorable conditions compared to 2015, with above average temperatures and much drier weather in June 2016 compared to June 2015. Although the extreme rainfall experienced in Texas and adjacent states was not as prevalent in the second quarter of 2016 as compared to 2015, Texas experienced above average precipitation yet another year. Florida and the Southeast experienced cooler temperatures compared to above average and record heat in certain areas in 2015. California and the Northwest experienced warm temperatures and normal levels of precipitation in the second quarter of both years.

Weather conditions in the third quarter of 2016 varied throughout the United States creating a neutral overall impact on our results. The eastern half of the country experienced above average temperatures, including record high temperatures in the Northeast and parts of the Midwest. The western half of the United States experienced mostly normal temperatures, while Texas experienced above average precipitation. The conditions in Texas in the third quarter of 2016 were in direct contrast to the weather in the same period of 2015 when Texas was drying out from heavy precipitation, lifting third quarter 2015 sales. California and the Northwest logged drier than normal conditions in the third quarter of 2016 compared to average precipitation last year. Most of the United States experienced warm temperatures during the fourth quarter of 2016, allowing projects to continue through the remainder of the year and contributing to sales growth over the prior year.

Weather Impacts on Fiscal Year 2015 to Fiscal Year 2014 Comparisons

In the first quarter of 2015, we benefited from favorable weather in most of our year-round markets, which experienced warmer than normal temperatures for this time of year. These warmer temperatures contributed to sales growth in maintenance products, such as chemicals, in these markets. Our seasonal markets experienced cooler than normal temperatures, particularly in the Northeast United States and eastern Canada, which experienced another year of near record cold temperatures and substantial snowfall, inhibiting sales growth in these areas. After our strong start, adverse weather conditions in the second quarter of 2015 negatively impacted sales in several important markets.

36



The second quarter of 2015 marked the wettest on record for much of Texas and Oklahoma and reflected significant precipitation for most states in the South and Central United States. This excessive precipitation significantly impacted our second quarter sales, delaying construction projects and reducing spending on related discretionary products. Cooler than normal temperatures in the Midwest and the Northeast in June of 2015, coupled with substantial rainfall, also delayed pool openings and hampered sales growth in these seasonal markets.

Weather conditions improved in the back half of the year as our third quarter 2015 sales benefited from a return to more normalized weather. The warmer than average temperatures and drier than normal conditions experienced throughout much of the United States later in the third quarter contributed to our sales growth. A mild September in the Northeast, which continued well into the fourth quarter of 2015, also extended the season in these markets. As reflected in our fourth quarter of 2015 sales growth, most areas east of the Mississippi River experienced the warmest temperatures on record through November and December.

Our largest, year-round markets experienced quite different weather conditions in 2014 as temperatures in Florida were normal to above average, and the West experienced warmer than average to record high temperatures almost all year, especially California and Arizona. However, severe drought conditions persisted in parts of California and Arizona through the second quarter of 2014, which limited second quarter sales growth in these markets. Temperatures and rainfall were closer to normal in Texas and the Southeast United States during the second quarter, which provided some relief from the difficult conditions we faced in other areas. Despite rainfall during the third and fourth quarters of 2014, severe drought conditions continued to afflict California. Drought conditions also developed in Texas, while the Southwest accumulated significant rainfall during the third quarter of 2014. In our seasonally slow fourth quarter, temperatures and precipitation levels ranged from normal to above average for most of the United States.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity is defined as the ability to generate adequate amounts of cash to meet short-term and long-term cash needs. We assess our liquidity in terms of our ability to generate cash to fund our operating activities, taking into consideration the seasonal nature of our business. Significant factors which could affect our liquidity include the following:

cash flows generated from operating activities;
the adequacy of available bank lines of credit;
acquisitions;
scheduled debt repayments;
dividend payments;
capital expenditures;
the timing and extent of share repurchases; and
the ability to attract long-term capital with satisfactory terms.

Our primary capital needs are seasonal working capital obligations and other general corporate initiatives, including acquisitions, dividend payments and share repurchases. Our primary sources of working capital are cash from operations supplemented by bank borrowings, which have historically been sufficient to support our growth and finance acquisitions. The same principle applies to funds used for capital expenditures and share repurchases.

We prioritize our use of cash based on investing in our business, maintaining a prudent debt structure and returning money to our shareholders. Our specific priorities for the use of cash are as follows:

maintenance and new sales center capital expenditures;
strategic acquisitions executed opportunistically;
payment of cash dividends as and when declared by our Board of Directors (Board);
repayment of debt to maintain an average total leverage ratio (as defined below) between 1.5 and 2.0; and
repurchases of our common stock under our Board authorized share repurchase program.

Over the last five years, capital expenditures have averaged roughly 1.0% of net sales. Capital expenditures were 1.4% of net sales in 2016, 1.0% of net sales in 2015 and 0.8% of net sales in 2014. Going forward, we project capital expenditures will be 1.0% to 1.5% of net sales as we expand facilities and purchase delivery vehicles to address growth opportunities.


37



Sources and Uses of Cash

The following table summarizes our cash flows (in thousands):

 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Operating activities
 
$
165,378

 
$
146,050

 
$
121,815

Investing activities
 
(55,643
)
 
(37,793
)
 
(27,811
)
Financing activities
 
(99,672
)
 
(107,804
)
 
(81,983
)

Cash provided by operations of $165.4 million in 2016 exceeded net income by $16.8 million.  Compared to 2015, cash provided by operations increased primarily due to higher net income. In 2015, cash provided by operations exceeded net income by $17.8 million and improved compared to 2014 due to our net income growth and working capital management.

Cash used in investing activities increased in 2016 due to an increase of $15.2 million in payments for acquisitions compared to 2015. Our 2015 cash used in investing activities reflects $4.5 million in net payments to fund three acquisitions. Our 2014 cash used in investing activities includes $10.6 million in net payments to fund four acquisitions. An additional $5.3 million of net capital expenditures in 2016 compared to 2015 funded our continued investment in new vehicles, equipment and technology. Cash used in investing activities for 2016 also includes $1.6 million in net payments to fund a revolving note under a credit agreement, which we entered into as a lender in 2015. For additional information regarding the revolving note, see Note 1 of our “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Cash used in financing activities decreased in 2016, primarily due to higher net borrowings on our debt arrangements. We had $109.4 million of net proceeds from our debt arrangements in 2016 compared to $8.9 million in 2015. We repurchased $175.6 million of shares in the open market in 2016, up $83.2 million compared to 2015. Cash used in financing activities in 2015 increased over 2014, reflecting lower net borrowings on our debt arrangements due to the increase in cash provided by operating activities and the decrease in share repurchases compared to 2014. We had net proceeds from our debt arrangements of $73.4 million in 2014, while we repurchased $132.3 million of shares in the open market.

Future Sources and Uses of Cash

To supplement cash from operations as our primary source of working capital, we will continue to utilize our two major credit facilities; our Revolving Credit Facility (the Credit Facility) and our Receivables Securitization Facility (the Receivables Facility). For additional details regarding these facilities, see Note 5 of our “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Revolving Credit Facility

Our Credit Facility provides for $465.0 million in borrowing capacity under a five-year unsecured revolving credit facility and includes sublimits for the issuance of swingline loans and standby letters of credit.  Pursuant to an accordion feature, the aggregate maximum principal amount of the commitments under the Credit Facility may be increased at our request and with agreement by the lenders by up to $75.0 million, to a total of $540.0 million.  The Credit Facility matures on November 20, 2020. We intend to use the Credit Facility for general corporate purposes, for future share repurchases and to fund future growth initiatives.
At December 31, 2016, there was $354.5 million outstanding and $110.5 million available for borrowing, subject to a $4.0 million standby letter of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility.  We utilize interest rate swap contracts and forward-starting interest rate swap contracts to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in variable interest rates for future interest payments on the Credit Facility.  In 2016, we had five interest rate swap contracts in place that terminated on October 19, 2016.  We currently have three interest rate swap contracts that became effective on October 19, 2016. These swap contracts were previously forward-starting and were amended in October 2015 to bring the fixed rates per the contracts in line with current market rates and extend the hedged period for future interest payments on our Credit Facility. Now effective, these amended swap contracts convert the Credit Facility’s variable interest rate to fixed rates of 2.273% on a notional amount of $75.0 million and 2.111% on two separate notional amounts, one $25.0 million and the other $50.0 million, totaling $75.0 million.  Interest expense related to the notional amounts under these swap contracts is based on the fixed rates plus the applicable margin on the Credit Facility.  These interest rate swap contracts will terminate on November 20, 2019.

38



In July 2016 we entered into a forward-starting interest rate swap contract to extend the hedged period for future interest payments on our Credit Facility to its maturity date. This swap contract will convert the Credit Facility’s variable interest rate to a fixed rate of 1.1425% on a notional amount of $150.0 million. The contract becomes effective on November 20, 2019 and terminates on November 20, 2020.
The weighted average effective interest rate for the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2016 was approximately 2.6%, excluding commitment fees.

Financial covenants on the Credit Facility include maintenance of a maximum average total leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, which are our most restrictive financial covenants.  As of December 31, 2016, the calculations of these two covenants are detailed below:

Maximum Average Total Leverage Ratio. On the last day of each fiscal quarter, our average total leverage ratio must be less than 3.25 to 1.00.  Average Total Leverage Ratio is the ratio of the trailing twelve months (TTM) Average Total Funded Indebtedness plus the TTM Average Accounts Securitization Proceeds divided by the TTM EBITDA (as those terms are defined in the Credit Facility).  As of December 31, 2016, our average total leverage ratio equaled 1.56 (compared to 1.61 as of December 31, 2015) and the TTM average total debt amount used in this calculation was $442.8 million.

Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio. On the last day of each fiscal quarter, our fixed charge ratio must be greater than or equal to 2.25 to 1.00. Fixed Charge Ratio is the ratio of the TTM EBITDAR divided by TTM Interest Expense paid or payable in cash plus TTM Rental Expense (as those terms are defined in the Credit Facility).  As of December 31, 2016, our fixed charge ratio equaled 5.41 (compared to 5.18 as of December 31, 2015) and TTM Rental Expense was $52.4 million.

The Credit Facility also limits the declaration and payment of dividends on our common stock to no more than 50% of the preceding year’s Net Income (as defined in the Credit Facility), provided no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing, or would result from the payment of dividends.  Additionally, we may declare and pay quarterly dividends notwithstanding that the aggregate amount of dividends paid would be in excess of the 50% limit described above so long as (i) the amount per share of such dividends does not exceed the amount per share paid during the most recent fiscal year in which we were in compliance with the 50% limit and (ii) our Average Total Leverage Ratio is less than 3.00 to 1.00 both immediately before and after giving pro forma effect to such dividends. Further, dividends must be declared and paid in a manner consistent with our past practice.

Under the Credit Facility, we may repurchase shares of our common stock provided no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing, or would result from the repurchase of shares, and our maximum average total leverage ratio (determined on a pro forma basis) is less than 2.50 to 1.00.  Other covenants include restrictions on our ability to grant liens, incur indebtedness, make investments, merge or consolidate, and sell or transfer assets.  Failure to comply with any of our financial covenants or any other terms of the Credit Facility could result in penalty payments, higher interest rates on our borrowings or the acceleration of the maturities of our outstanding debt.

Receivables Securitization Facility

As amended on October 28, 2016, our two-year Receivables Facility offers us a lower cost form of financing, with a peak funding capacity of up to $220.0 million between May 1 and June 30, which includes an additional seasonal funding capacity that is available between March 1 and July 31. Other funding capacities range from $65.0 million to $150.0 million throughout the remaining months of the year.
The Receivables Facility provides for the sale of certain of our receivables to a wholly owned subsidiary (the Securitization Subsidiary). The Securitization Subsidiary transfers variable undivided percentage interests in the receivables and related rights to certain third party financial institutions in exchange for cash proceeds, limited to the applicable funding capacities. Upon payment of the receivables by customers, rather than remitting to the financial institutions the amounts collected, we retain such collections as proceeds for the sale of new receivables until payments become due.
The Receivables Facility contains terms and conditions (including representations, covenants and conditions precedent) customary for transactions of this type. Additionally, an amortization event will occur if we fail to maintain a maximum average total leverage ratio (average total funded debt/EBITDA) of 3.25 to 1.00 and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio (EBITDAR/cash interest expense plus rental expense) of 2.25 to 1.00.
At December 31, 2016, there was $83.5 million outstanding under the Receivables Facility at a weighted average effective interest rate of 1.5%, excluding commitment fees.

39




As of December 31, 2016, we were in compliance with all covenants and financial ratio requirements.  We believe we will remain in compliance with all covenants and financial ratio requirements throughout 2017.  For additional information regarding our debt arrangements, see Note 5 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,” included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

We believe we have adequate availability of capital to fund present operations and the current capacity to finance any working capital needs that may arise.  We continually evaluate potential acquisitions and hold discussions with acquisition candidates. If suitable acquisition opportunities arise that would require financing, we believe that we have the ability to finance any such transactions.

As of February 20, 2017, $46.6 million of the current Board authorized amount under our authorized share repurchase plan remained available. We expect to repurchase additional shares in the open market from time to time depending on market conditions. We plan to fund these repurchases with cash provided by operations and borrowings under the credit and receivables facilities.

Contractual Obligations

At December 31, 2016, our contractual obligations for long-term debt and operating leases were as follows (in thousands):

 
 
 
 
Payments Due by Period
 
 
Total
 
Less than
1 year
 
1-3 years
 
3-5 years
 
More than
5 years
Long-term debt
 
$
439,154

 
$
1,105

 
$
83,500

 
$
354,549

 
$

Operating leases
 
182,376

 
47,324

 
72,996

 
42,166

 
19,890

 
 
$
621,530

 
$
48,429

 
$
156,496

 
$
396,715

 
$
19,890


For additional discussion related to our debt, see Note 5 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,” included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.  The table below contains estimated interest payments (in thousands) related to our long-term debt obligations listed in the table above.  Our estimates of future interest payments are calculated based on the December 31, 2016 outstanding debt balances, using the fixed rates under our interest rate swap agreements for the applicable notional amounts and the weighted average effective interest rates as of December 31, 2016 for the remaining outstanding balances not covered by our swap contracts.  To project the estimated interest expense to coincide with the time periods used in the table above, we have projected the estimated debt balances for future years based on the scheduled maturity dates of the Credit Facility and the Receivables Facility. For certain of our contractual obligations, such as unrecognized tax benefits, uncertainties exist regarding the timing of future payments and the amount by which these potential obligations will increase or decrease over time. As such, we have excluded unrecognized tax benefits from our contractual obligations table. See Note 7 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,” included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for more information related to our unrecognized tax benefits.  

 
 
 
 
Estimated Payments Due by Period
 
 
Total
 
Less than
1 year
 
1-3 years
 
3-5 years
 
More than
5 years
Interest
 
$
34,207

 
$
9,482

 
$
17,515

 
$
7,210

 
$



40



Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to market risks, including interest rate risk and foreign currency risk. The adverse effects of potential changes in these market risks are discussed below. The following discussion does not consider the effects of the reduced level of overall economic activity that could exist following such changes. Further, in the event of changes of such magnitude, we would likely take actions to mitigate our exposure to such changes.

Interest Rate Risk

Our earnings are exposed to changes in short-term interest rates because of the variable interest rates on our debt. However, we have entered into interest rate swap contracts to reduce our exposure to market fluctuations. For information about our debt arrangements and interest rate swaps, see Note 5 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,” included in Item 8 of this Form 10‑K.

In 2016, there was no interest rate risk related to the notional amounts under our interest rate swap contracts for the Credit Facility. The portions of our outstanding balances under the Credit Facility and the Receivables Facility that were not covered by our interest rate swap contracts were both subject to variable interest rates. To calculate the potential impact in 2016 related to interest rate risk, we performed a sensitivity analysis assuming that we borrowed the maximum available amount under the Credit Facility excluding the accordion feature, and the off-season maximum amount available under the Receivables Facility. In this analysis, we assumed that the variable interest rates for the Credit Facility and the Receivables Facility increased by 1.0%. Based on this calculation, our pretax income would have decreased by approximately $4.4 million and earnings per share would have decreased by approximately $0.06 per diluted share (based on the number of weighted average diluted shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2016). The maximum amount available under the Credit Facility is $465.0 million excluding the $75.0 million accordion feature and the maximum amount available under the Receivables Facility is $180.0 million excluding the $40.0 million seasonal increase in capacity available from March 1 to July 31.

Failure of our swap counterparties would result in the loss of any potential benefit to us under our swap agreements. In this case, we would still be obligated to pay the variable interest payments underlying our debt agreements. Additionally, failure of our swap counterparties would not eliminate our obligation to continue to make payments under our existing swap agreements if we continue to be in a net pay position.

Currency Risk

We have subsidiaries in Canada, the United Kingdom, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Mexico, Colombia and Australia. Based on the functional currencies for these international subsidiaries as shown in the table below, changes in exchange rates for these currencies may positively or negatively impact our sales, operating expenses and earnings. Historically, we have not hedged our currency exposure and fluctuations in exchange rates have not materially affected our operating results. While our international operations accounted for only 8% of total net sales in 2016, our exposure to currency rate fluctuations could be material in 2017 and future years to the extent that either currency rate changes are significant or that our international operations comprise a larger percentage of our consolidated results.

Functional Currencies
Canada
Canadian Dollar
United Kingdom
British Pound
Belgium
Euro
France
Euro
Germany
Euro
Italy
Euro
Portugal
Euro
Spain
Euro
Mexico
Mexican Peso
Colombia
Colombian Peso
Australia
Australian Dollar

41



Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



42



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Pool Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pool Corporation as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Pool Corporation at December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Pool Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework), and our report dated February 24, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

                                eysiga07.jpg
New Orleans, Louisiana
February 24, 2017


43



POOL CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Income
(In thousands, except per share data)

 
Year Ended December 31,
  
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Net sales
$
2,570,803

 
$
2,363,139

 
$
2,246,562

Cost of sales
1,829,716

 
1,687,495

 
1,603,222

Gross profit
741,087

 
675,644

 
643,340

Selling and administrative expenses
485,228

 
459,422

 
454,470

Operating income
255,859

 
216,222

 
188,870

Interest and other non-operating expenses, net
14,481

 
8,072

 
7,485

Income before income taxes and equity earnings
241,378

 
208,150

 
181,385

Provision for income taxes
92,931

 
80,137

 
70,559

Equity earnings in unconsolidated investments, net
156

 
211

 
204

Net income
148,603

 
128,224

 
111,030

Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
352

 
51

 
(338
)
Net income attributable to Pool Corporation
$
148,955

 
$
128,275

 
$
110,692

 
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
3.56

 
$
2.98

 
$
2.50

Diluted
$
3.47

 
$
2.90

 
$
2.44

Weighted average shares outstanding:
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
41,872

 
43,105

 
44,281

Diluted
42,984

 
44,254

 
45,441

 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash dividends declared per common share
$
1.19

 
$
1.00

 
$
0.85


The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.



44



POOL CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(In thousands)

 
Year Ended December 31,
  
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Net income
$
148,603

 
$
128,224

 
$
111,030

Other comprehensive income (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation adjustments
(1,661
)
 
(9,046
)
 
(6,271
)
Change in unrealized gains and losses on interest rate swaps,
net of the change in taxes of $(839), $653 and $194
1,312

 
(1,021
)
 
(303
)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
(349
)
 
(10,067
)
 
(6,574
)
Comprehensive income
148,254

 
118,157

 
104,456

Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
378

 
448

 
18

Comprehensive income attributable to Pool Corporation
$
148,632

 
$
118,605

 
$
104,474


The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.



45



POOL CORPORATION
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)

 
December 31,
 
2016
 
2015
Assets
 
 
 
Current assets:
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
21,956

 
$
13,237

Receivables, net
61,437

 
54,173

Receivables pledged under receivables facility
104,714

 
102,583

Product inventories, net
486,116

 
474,275

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
15,318

 
11,946

Deferred income taxes
6,016

 
5,530

Total current assets
695,557

 
661,744

 
 
 
 
Property and equipment, net
83,290

 
69,854

Goodwill
184,795

 
172,761

Other intangible assets, net
13,326

 
11,845

Equity interest investments
1,172

 
1,231

Other assets
15,955

 
16,926

Total assets
$
994,095

 
$
934,361

 
 
 
 
Liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interest and stockholders’ equity
 
 
 

Current liabilities:
 
 
 

Accounts payable
$
230,728

 
$
246,554

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
64,387

 
56,591

Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt and
other long-term liabilities
1,105

 
1,700

Total current liabilities
296,220

 
304,845

 
 
 
 
Deferred income taxes
34,475

 
29,808

Long-term debt, net
436,937

 
326,345

Other long-term liabilities
18,966

 
14,955

Total liabilities
786,598

 
675,953

 
 
 
 
Redeemable noncontrolling interest
2,287

 
2,665

 
 
 
 
Stockholders’ equity:
 
 
 

Common stock, $.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized;
41,089,720 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and
42,711,016 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2015
41

 
43

Additional paid-in capital
403,162

 
374,138

Retained deficit
(183,915
)
 
(104,709
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(14,078
)
 
(13,729
)
Total stockholders’ equity
205,210

 
255,743

Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interest and stockholders’ equity
$
994,095

 
$
934,361


The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

46



POOL CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Operating activities
 
 
 
 
 
Net income 
$
148,603

 
$
128,224

 
$
111,030

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 

Depreciation
20,338

 
16,373

 
14,495

Amortization
1,639

 
1,015

 
1,387

Share-based compensation
9,902

 
9,543

 
9,065

Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation
(7,370
)
 
(7,706
)
 
(5,524
)
Provision for doubtful accounts receivable, net of write-offs
(155
)
 
197

 
(539
)
Provision for inventory obsolescence, net of write-offs
(448
)
 
576

 
(687
)
Provision for deferred income taxes
3,749

 
4,198

 
6,986

(Gains) losses on sales of property and equipment
(320
)
 
230

 
179

Equity earnings in unconsolidated investments, net
(156
)
 
(211
)
 
(204
)
Net losses on foreign currency transactions
679

 
774

 
277

Impairments of goodwill and other non-operating assets
4,113

 
500

 

Other
923

 
(869
)
 
206

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:
 
 
 
 
 

Receivables
(5,666
)
 
(16,656
)
 
(12,751
)
Product inventories
(8,050
)
 
(10,848
)
 
(30,409
)
Prepaid expenses and other assets
(3,077
)
 
(434
)
 
(2,265
)
Accounts payable
(17,896
)
 
9,956

 
20,090

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
18,570

 
11,188

 
10,479

Net cash provided by operating activities
165,378

 
146,050

 
121,815

 
 
 
 
 
 
Investing activities
 
 
 

 
 

Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired
(19,730
)
 
(4,483
)
 
(10,648
)
Purchases of property and equipment, net of sale proceeds
(34,352
)
 
(29,095
)
 
(17,328
)
Payments to fund credit agreement
(5,322
)
 
(8,860
)
 

Collections from credit agreement
3,737

 
4,557

 

Other investments, net
24

 
88

 
165

Net cash used in investing activities
(55,643
)
 
(37,793
)
 
(27,811
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financing activities
 
 
 
 
 

Proceeds from revolving line of credit
1,154,090

 
911,712

 
820,720

Payments on revolving line of credit
(1,072,557
)
 
(890,406
)
 
(763,429
)
Proceeds from asset-backed financing
155,000

 
143,400

 
121,600

Payments on asset-backed financing
(126,500
)
 
(156,000
)
 
(106,000
)
Proceeds from short-term borrowings, long-term debt and other long-term liabilities
18,442

 
8,119

 
3,607

Payments on short-term borrowings, long-term debt and other long-term liabilities
(19,037
)
 
(7,948
)
 
(3,075
)
Payments of deferred financing costs
(69
)
 
(320
)
 
(394
)
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation
7,370

 
7,706

 
5,524

Proceeds from stock issued under share-based compensation plans
11,752

 
18,269

 
13,530

Payments of cash dividends
(49,749
)
 
(43,117
)
 
(37,600
)
Purchases of treasury stock
(178,414
)
 
(99,219
)
 
(136,466
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(99,672
)
 
(107,804
)
 
(81,983
)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(1,344
)
 
(2,046
)
 
(5,197
)
Change in cash and cash equivalents
8,719

 
(1,593
)
 
6,824

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
13,237

 
14,830

 
8,006

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
$
21,956

 
$
13,237

 
$
14,830


The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

47



POOL CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
(In thousands)

 
 
Common Stock
 
Additional
Paid-In
 
Retained
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
 
 
 
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Deficit
 
Income (Loss)
 
Total
Balance at December 31, 2013
 
45,379

 
$
45

 
$
310,503

 
$
(27,278
)
 
$
2,912

 
$
286,182

Net income attributable to Pool Corporation
 

 

 

 
110,692

 

 
110,692

Foreign currency translation
 

 

 

 

 
(6,271
)
 
(6,271
)
Interest rate swaps, net of the change in taxes of $194
 

 

 

 

 
(303
)
 
(303
)
Repurchases of common stock, net of retirements
 
(2,421
)
 
(2
)
 

 
(136,464
)
 

 
(136,466
)
Share-based compensation
 

 

 
9,065

 

 

 
9,065

Issuance of shares under incentive stock plans, including tax benefit of $5,524
 
553

 
1

 
19,052

 

 

 
19,053

Declaration of cash dividends
 

 

 

 
(37,600
)
 

 
(37,600
)
Balance at December 31, 2014
 
43,511

 
44

 
338,620

 
(90,650
)
 
(3,662
)
 
244,352

Net income attributable to Pool Corporation
 

 

 

 
128,275

 

 
128,275

Foreign currency translation
 

 

 

 

 
(9,046
)
 
(9,046
)
Interest rate swaps, net of the change in taxes of $653
 

 

 

 

 
(1,021
)
 
(1,021
)
Repurchases of common stock, net of retirements
 
(1,448
)
 
(2
)
 

 
(99,217
)
 

 
(99,219
)
Share-based compensation
 

 

 
9,543

 

 

 
9,543

Issuance of shares under incentive stock plans, including tax benefit of $7,706
 
648

 
1

 
25,975

 

 

 
25,976

Declaration of cash dividends
 

 

 

 
(43,117
)
 

 
(43,117
)
Balance at December 31, 2015
 
42,711

 
43

 
374,138

 
(104,709
)
 
(13,729
)
 
255,743

Net income attributable to Pool Corporation
 

 

 

 
148,955

 

 
148,955

Foreign currency translation
 

 

 

 

 
(1,661
)
 
(1,661
)
Interest rate swaps, net of the change in taxes of $(839)
 

 

 

 

 
1,312

 
1,312

Repurchases of common stock, net of retirements
 
(2,064
)
 
(2
)
 

 
(178,412
)
 

 
(178,414
)
Share-based compensation
 

 

 
9,902

 

 

 
9,902

Issuance of shares under incentive stock plans, including tax benefit of $7,370
 
443

 

 
19,122

 

 

 
19,122

Declaration of cash dividends
 

 

 

 
(49,749
)
 

 
(49,749
)
Balance at December 31, 2016
 
41,090

 
$
41

 
$
403,162

 
$
(183,915
)
 
$
(14,078
)
 
$
205,210


The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

48



POOL CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Note 1 - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Description of Business

As of December 31, 2016, Pool Corporation and our subsidiaries (the Company, which may be referred to as we, us or our), operated 344 sales centers in North America, Europe, South America and Australia from which we sell swimming pool equipment, parts and supplies, irrigation and landscape products and hardscape, tile and stone products to pool builders, retail stores, service companies, landscape contractors and golf courses. We distribute products through four networks: SCP Distributors (SCP), Superior Pool Products (Superior), Horizon Distributors (Horizon) and National Pool Tile (NPT).

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

We prepared the Consolidated Financial Statements following U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The financial statements include all normal and recurring adjustments that are necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and operating results. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Pool Corporation and our subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

All of our subsidiaries are wholly owned with the exception of Pool Systems Pty. Ltd. (PSL), an Australian company. On July 31, 2014, we completed the purchase of a 60% interest in PSL and accounted for this acquisition using the acquisition method of accounting. The purchase constitutes a controlling interest in the acquired company, which requires us to consolidate PSL’s financial position and results of operations from the date of acquisition.

Variable Interest Entity

In February 2015, we entered into a five-year credit agreement with a swimming pool retailer. Under this agreement and the related revolving note, we are the primary lender of operating funds for this entity. The total lending commitment under the credit agreement is $8.5 million, of which $8.4 million was owed as of December 31, 2016. Amounts funded under the credit agreement are recorded within Other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are collateralized by essentially all of the assets of the business. We have a variable interest in this entity; however, we have no decision-making authority over its activities through voting or other rights. Additionally, we have no obligation to absorb any of its losses, nor do we have the right to receive any residual returns, should either occur. We are not considered the primary beneficiary of this variable interest entity, and therefore we are not required to consolidate this entity’s financial statements.

Use of Estimates

In order to prepare financial statements that conform to GAAP, we make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements and accompanying notes. Our most significant estimates are those relating to the allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory obsolescence reserves, vendor incentives, income taxes, incentive compensation accruals and goodwill impairment evaluations. We continually review our estimates and make adjustments as necessary, but actual results could be significantly different from what we expected when we made these estimates.

Newly Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Upon adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) - Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (ASU 2015-03), we now include financing costs, net of accumulated amortization as a component of long-term debt. For comparability across all periods presented on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, we reclassified certain amounts from Other assets, net in 2015 to Long-term debt, net to conform to our 2016 presentation. For additional information related to our deferred financing costs and amounts reclassified, see Note 5.

As required, we adopted ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (ASU 2014-15), as of December 31, 2016. Based on management’s evaluation, which included forecasting results covering the one-year period following our 2016 Form 10-K filing date, we did not identify any conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Accordingly the adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our financial position, results of operations and related disclosures.


49


Segment Reporting

Since all of our sales centers have similar operations and share similar economic characteristics, we aggregate our sales centers into a single reportable segment. These similarities include (i) the nature of our products and services, (ii) the types of customers we sell to and (iii) the distribution methods we use. Our chief operating decision maker (CODM) evaluates each sales center based on individual performance that includes both financial and operational measures. These measures include operating income growth and accounts receivable and inventory management criteria. Each sales center manager and eligible field employee earns performance-based incentive compensation based on these measures developed at the sales center level.

A bottom-up approach is used to develop the operating budget for each individual sales center. The CODM approves the budget and routinely monitors budget to actual results for each sales center. Additionally, our CODM makes decisions about how to allocate resources primarily on a sales center-by-sales center basis. No single sales center meets any of the quantitative thresholds (10% of revenues, profit or assets) for separately reporting information about an operating segment. We do not track sales by product lines and product categories on a consolidated basis. We lack readily available financial information due to the number of our product lines and product categories and the fact that we make ongoing changes as to how products are classified within these groups, thus making it impracticable to report our sales by product category.

Seasonality and Weather

Our business is highly seasonal and weather is one of the principal external factors affecting our business. In general, sales and net income are highest during the second and third quarters, which represent the peak months of both swimming pool use and installation and landscape installations and maintenance. Sales are substantially lower during the first and fourth quarters, when we may incur net losses.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when four basic criteria are met:

1.   persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;
2.   delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;
3.   our price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and
4.   collectibility is reasonably assured.

We record revenue when customers take delivery of products. Customers may pick up products at any sales center location, or we may deliver products to their premises or job sites via our trucks or third party carriers. Products shipped via third party carriers are considered delivered based on the shipping terms, which are generally FOB shipping point. We include shipping and handling fees billed to customers as freight out income within net sales.

We offer volume incentives to some of our customers and we account for these incentives as an adjustment to sales. We estimate the amount of volume incentives earned based on our estimate of cumulative sales for the fiscal year relative to our customers’ progress toward achieving minimum purchase requirements. We record customer returns, including those associated with early buy programs, as an adjustment to sales. Based on available information related to our customers’ returns, we record an allowance for estimated returns, which historically has not been material. Other items that we record as adjustments to sales include cash discounts, pricing adjustments and credit card fees related to customer payments.

We also report sales net of tax amounts that we collect from our customers and remit to governmental authorities. These tax amounts may include, but are not limited to, sales, use, value added and some excise taxes.

We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASU 2014-09) and subsequent amendments issued to provide clarifications on the new guidance. We expect to apply the guidance using the cumulative-effect transition method. Based on our analysis performed to date, we do not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations but will result in additional disclosures regarding our revenue recognition policies. ASU 2014-09 will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, which for us will be in the period beginning January 1, 2018.


50


Vendor Programs

Many of our arrangements with our vendors provide for us to receive specified amounts of consideration when we achieve any of a number of measures. These measures are generally related to the volume level of purchases from our vendors and may include negotiated pricing arrangements. We account for vendor programs as vendor incentives, and accordingly as a reduction of the prices of the vendors’ products and therefore as a reduction of inventory until we sell the products, at which time such incentives are recognized as a reduction of Cost of sales on our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Throughout the year, we estimate the amount earned based on our estimate of total purchases for the fiscal year relative to the purchase levels that mark our progress toward earning each program. We accrue vendor incentives on a monthly basis using these estimates, provided that we determine they are probable and reasonably estimable. We continually revise these estimates to reflect actual credits earned based on actual purchase levels and trends related to sales and purchasing mix. When we make adjustments to our estimates, we determine whether any portion of the adjustment impacts the amount of vendor incentives that are deferred in inventory. We recognize changes in our estimates as a cumulative catch-up adjustment to the amounts recognized to date in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Shipping and Handling Costs

We record shipping and handling costs associated with inbound freight as cost of sales. The table below presents shipping and handling costs associated with outbound freight, which we include in selling and administrative expenses (in thousands):
2016
 
2015
 
2014
$
39,879

 
$
36,783

 
$
38,674


Share-Based Compensation

We record share-based compensation for stock options and other share-based awards based on the estimated fair value as measured on the grant date. For stock option awards, we use a Black-Scholes model for estimating the grant date fair value. For additional discussion of share-based compensation, see Note 6.

Advertising Costs

We expense advertising costs when incurred. The table below presents advertising expense for the past three years (in thousands):
2016
 
2015
 
2014
$
7,011

 
$
7,127

 
$
6,894


Income Taxes

We record deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities using currently enacted rates and laws that will be in effect when we expect the differences to reverse. Due to changing tax laws and state income tax rates, significant judgment is required to estimate the effective tax rate expected to apply to tax differences that are expected to reverse in the future.

We record a valuation allowance to reduce the carrying amounts of net deferred tax assets if there is uncertainty regarding their future realization. We consider many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization including our recent cumulative earnings experience by taxing jurisdiction, expectations of future taxable income, the carryforward periods available to us for tax reporting purposes and other relevant factors. For additional discussion of income taxes, see Note 7.

Equity Method Investments

We account for our 50% investment in Northpark Corporate Center, LLC (NCC) using the equity method of accounting. Accordingly, we report our share of income or loss based on our ownership interest in this investment.


51


Earnings Per Share

We calculate basic earnings per share by dividing Net income or loss attributable to Pool Corporation by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. We include outstanding unvested restricted stock awards of our common stock in the basic weighted average share calculation. Diluted earnings per share includes the dilutive effects of other share-based awards. For additional discussion of earnings per share, see Note 8.

Foreign Currency

The functional currency of each of our foreign subsidiaries is its applicable local currency. We translate our foreign subsidiary financial statements into U.S. dollars based on published exchange rates. We include these translation adjustments as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We include realized transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations in Interest and other non-operating expenses, net on the Consolidated Statements of Income. We realized net foreign currency transaction losses of $0.7 million in 2016, $0.8 million in 2015 and $0.3 million in 2014.

Fair Value Measurements

Our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis include the unrealized gains or losses on our interest rate swap contracts and contingent consideration related to recent acquisitions. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under the accounting guidance are described below:

Level 1
Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2
Inputs to the valuation methodology include:
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;
quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets;
inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; or
inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3
Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

The table below presents the estimated fair values of our interest rate swap contracts, our forward-starting interest rate swap contract and our contingent consideration liabilities (in thousands):
 
 
Fair Value at December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
Level 2
 
 
 
 
Unrealized gains on interest rate swaps
 
$
1,521

 
$

Unrealized losses on interest rate swaps
 
3,138

 
3,295

 
 
 
 
 
Level 3
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration liabilities
 
$
1,611

 
$
806


We include unrealized gains in Prepaid expenses and other current assets and unrealized losses in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For determining the fair value of our interest rate swap and forward-starting interest rate swap contracts, we use significant other observable market data or assumptions (Level 2 inputs as defined in the accounting guidance) that we believe market participants would use in pricing similar assets or liabilities, including assumptions about counterparty risk.  Our fair value estimates reflect an income approach based on the terms of the interest rate swap contracts and inputs corroborated by observable market data including interest rate curves.


52


As of December 31, 2016, our Consolidated Balance Sheets reflect $0.2 million in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities and $1.4 million in Other long-term liabilities for contingent consideration related to future payouts for our acquisitions of The Melton Corporation and Metro Irrigation Supply Company Ltd. In determining our original estimates for contingent consideration, which are based on a percentage of gross profit for certain products for The Melton Corporation and a multiple of gross profit for Metro Irrigation Supply Company Ltd., we applied a linear model using our best estimate of gross profit projections for fiscal years 2016 to 2020 (Level 3 inputs as defined in the accounting guidance). The maximum total payout for Metro Irrigation Supply Company Ltd. over this time period is $1.0 million. Since the acquisition dates, we have recorded minimal adjustments to our original estimates based on the calculated 2017 payouts related to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. Adjustments to the fair value of contingent consideration are recognized in earnings in the period in which we determine that the fair value changed. We have determined that the contingent consideration liability was in a range of acceptable estimates as of December 31, 2016.

The carrying values of cash, receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to the short maturity of those instruments (Level 1 inputs). For the note receivable with our variable interest entity, our determination of the estimated fair value reflects a discounted cash flow model using our estimates, including assumptions related to collectibility (Level 3 inputs). In 2016, we recorded $3.5 million of fair value adjustments to reduce the note receivable to an amount that was based on the results of our discounted cash flow model for expected payments under the note receivable. The carrying value of this note receivable, including adjustments, approximates fair value. The carrying value of long-term debt approximates fair value.  Our determination of the estimated fair value reflects a discounted cash flow model using our estimates, including assumptions related to borrowing rates (Level 3 inputs).

Derivatives and Hedging Activities

We have designated our interest rate swap and forward-starting interest rate swap contracts as cash flow hedges, and we assess hedge effectiveness on a quarterly basis. To the extent that these hedges are effective, we record the changes in the estimated fair value of the swaps to Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Any hedge ineffectiveness is recorded as a component of Interest and other non-operating expenses, net on our Consolidated Statements of Income. We recognize any differences between the variable interest rate payments and the fixed interest rate settlements from our swap counterparties as an adjustment to interest expense over the life of the swaps.
Our interest rate swap and forward-starting interest rate swap contracts are subject to master netting arrangements. According to our accounting policy, we do not offset the fair values of assets with the fair values of liabilities related to these contracts.

For our interest rate swap contracts currently in effect, a portion of the change in the estimated fair value between periods relates to future interest expense. Recognition of the change in fair value between periods attributable to accrued interest is reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to Interest and other non-operating expenses, net on the Consolidated Statements of Income. These amounts were not material in 2016, 2015 or 2014. In October 2016 we began reclassifying the fair values related to our original forward-starting swaps from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to Interest and other non-operating expenses, net. These unrealized losses will be amortized over the effective period of the original forward-starting interest rate swap contracts from October 2016 to September 2018. For additional discussion of our interest rate swaps, see Note 5.

Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Credit Risk and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We record trade receivables at the invoiced amounts less an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses we may incur if customers do not pay. We perform periodic credit evaluations of our customers and we typically do not require collateral. Consistent with industry practices, we generally require payment from our North American customers within 30 days, except for sales under early buy programs for which we provide extended payment terms to qualified customers.

At the end of each quarter, we perform a reserve analysis of all accounts with balances greater than $20,000 and more than 60 days past due. Additionally, we perform a separate reserve analysis on the balance of our accounts receivables with emphasis on the remainder of the past due portion of the aging. During the year, we write off account balances when we have exhausted reasonable collection efforts and determined that the likelihood of collection is remote. These write-offs are charged against our allowance for doubtful accounts.


53


The following table summarizes the changes in our allowance for doubtful accounts for the past three years (in thousands):
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Balance at beginning of year
 
$
4,205

 
$
4,008

 
$
4,547

Bad debt expense
 
1,199

 
1,110

 
1,167

Write-offs, net of recoveries
 
(1,354
)
 
(913
)
 
(1,706
)
Balance at end of year
 
$
4,050

 
$
4,205

 
$
4,008


Product Inventories and Reserve for Inventory Obsolescence

Product inventories consist primarily of goods we purchase from manufacturers to sell to our customers. We record inventory at the lower of cost, using the average cost method, or market. We establish our reserve for inventory obsolescence based on inventory turns by class with particular emphasis on stock keeping units with the weakest sales over the previous 12 months (or 36 months for tile and 48 months for parts products). The reserve is intended to reflect the net realizable value of inventory that we may not be able to sell at a profit.

In evaluating the adequacy of our reserve for inventory obsolescence, we consider a combination of factors including:

the level of inventory in relation to historical sales by product, including inventory usage by class based on product sales at both the sales center and on a company-wide basis;
changes in customer preferences or regulatory requirements;
seasonal fluctuations in inventory levels;
geographic location; and
superseded products and new product offerings.

We periodically adjust our reserve for inventory obsolescence as changes occur in the above-identified factors.

The following table summarizes the changes in our reserve for inventory obsolescence for the past three years (in thousands):
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Balance at beginning of year
 
$
6,979

 
$
6,403

 
$
7,103

Provision for inventory write-downs
 
2,036

 
3,043

 
1,535

Deduction for inventory write-offs
 
(2,484
)
 
(2,467
)
 
(2,235
)
Balance at end of year
 
$
6,531

 
$
6,979

 
$
6,403



Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. We depreciate property and equipment on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives:

Buildings
40 years
Leasehold improvements (1)
1 - 10 years
Autos and trucks
3 - 6 years
Machinery and equipment
3 - 15 years
Computer equipment
3 - 7 years
Furniture and fixtures
5 - 10 years

(1) 
For substantial improvements made near the end of a lease term where we are reasonably certain the lease will be renewed, we amortize the leasehold improvement over the remaining life of the lease including the expected renewal period.


54


The table below presents depreciation expense for the past three years (in thousands):
2016

2015
 
2014
$
20,338

 
$
16,373

 
$
14,495


Acquisitions

We use the acquisition method of accounting and recognize assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value as of the acquisition date. Any contingent assets acquired and contingent liabilities assumed are also recognized at fair value if we can reasonably estimate fair value during the measurement period (which cannot exceed one year from the acquisition date). We remeasure any contingent liabilities at fair value in each subsequent reporting period. We expense all acquisition-related costs as incurred, including any restructuring costs associated with a business combination.

If our initial acquisition accounting is incomplete by the end of the reporting period in which a business combination occurs, we report provisional amounts for incomplete items. Once we obtain information required to finalize the accounting for incomplete items, we retrospectively adjust the provisional amounts recognized as of the acquisition date. We make adjustments to these provisional amounts during the measurement period.

For all acquisitions, we include the results of operations in our Consolidated Financial Statements as of the acquisition date. For additional discussion of acquisitions, see Note 2.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the excess of the amount we paid to acquire a company over the estimated fair value of tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets acquired, less liabilities assumed. We test goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually as of October 1st and at any other time when impairment indicators exist.

We estimate fair value based on an income approach that incorporates our assumptions for determining the present value of future cash flows.  We project future cash flows using management’s assumptions for sales growth rates, operating margins, discount rates and multiples. These assumptions are considered unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs as defined in the accounting guidance). If the estimated fair value of any of our reporting units falls below its carrying value, we compare the estimated fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill to its carrying value. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its estimated fair value, we recognize the difference as an impairment loss in operating income. Since we define an operating segment as an individual sales center and we do not have operations below the sales center level, our reporting unit is an individual sales center. For additional discussion of goodwill and other intangible assets, see Note 3.

Receivables Securitization Facility

Our accounts receivable securitization facility (the Receivables Facility) provides for the sale of certain of our receivables to a wholly owned subsidiary (the Securitization Subsidiary). The Securitization Subsidiary transfers variable undivided percentage interests in the receivables and related rights to certain third party financial institutions in exchange for cash proceeds, limited to the applicable funding capacities.

We account for the sale of the receivable interests as a secured borrowing on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The receivables subject to the agreement collateralize the cash proceeds received from the third party financial institutions. We classify the entire outstanding balance as Long-term debt on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as we intend and have the ability to refinance the obligations on a long‑term basis. We present the receivables that collateralize the cash proceeds separately as Receivables pledged under receivables facility on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For additional discussion of the Receivables Facility, see Note 5.

Self Insurance

We are self-insured for employee health benefits, workers’ compensation coverage, property and casualty, and automobile insurance. To limit our exposure, we also maintain excess and aggregate liability coverage. We establish self‑insurance reserves based on estimates of claims incurred but not reported and information that we obtain from third-party service providers regarding known claims. Our management reviews these reserves based on consideration of various factors, including but not limited to the age of existing claims, estimated settlement amounts and other historical claims data.


55


Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest

In July 2014, we purchased a controlling interest in PSL. Included in the transaction documents is a put/call option deed that grants us an option to purchase the shares held by the noncontrolling interest, and grants the holder of the noncontrolling interest an option to require us to purchase its shares in one or two transactions. The put/call option deed in this transaction is considered an equity contract and therefore a financial instrument under the accounting guidance. In applying the guidance for this transaction, we have determined that the financial instrument is embedded in the noncontrolling interest. As a public company, we are required to classify the noncontrolling interest and the embedded financial instrument as redeemable noncontrolling interest in a separate section of our Consolidated Balance Sheets, between liabilities and equity.

At the end of each period, we record the portion of comprehensive income or loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest to Redeemable noncontrolling interest to determine the carrying amount. We are required to compare the carrying amount to our estimated redemption value at the end of each reporting period. The redemption value is based on a multiple of a PSL earnings measure for a specified time period. To the extent that the estimated redemption value exceeds the carrying amount, we would record an adjustment to Redeemable noncontrolling interest. We did not record such an adjustment in 2016, 2015 or 2014.

The table below presents the changes in Redeemable noncontrolling interest (in thousands):
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Redeemable noncontrolling interest, beginning of period
$
2,665

 
$
3,113

 
$

Acquisition date value

 

 
3,131

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
(352
)
 
(51
)
 
338

Other comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
(26
)
 
(397
)
 
(356
)
Redeemable noncontrolling interest, end of period
$
2,287

 
$
2,665

 
$
3,113


Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The table below presents the components of our Accumulated other comprehensive loss balance (in thousands):

 
 December 31,
 
2016
 
2015
Foreign currency translation adjustments
$
(13,024
)
 
$
(11,362
)
Unrealized losses on interest rate swaps, net of tax
(1,054
)
 
(2,367
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
$
(14,078
)
 
$
(13,729
)

Retained Deficit

We account for the retirement of treasury share repurchases as an increase of our Retained deficit on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.  As of December 31, 2016, the retained deficit reflects cumulative net income, the cumulative impact of adjustments for changes in accounting pronouncements, treasury share retirements since the inception of our share repurchase programs of $1,093.3 million and cumulative dividends declared of $367.7 million.

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

The following table presents supplemental disclosures to the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands):

 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Cash paid during the year for:
 
 
 
 
 
Interest 
$
8,052

 
$
6,316

 
$
6,481

Income taxes, net of refunds
80,378

 
65,668

 
58,405



56



Note 2 - Acquisitions

2016 Acquisitions

In April 2016, we acquired the distribution assets of Metro Irrigation Supply Company Ltd., an irrigation and landscape supply company with eight locations in Texas.

We have completed our acquisition accounting for this acquisition, subject to adjustments for standard holdback provisions per the terms of the purchase agreement, which are not material. This acquisition did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

2015 Acquisitions

In November 2015, we acquired the distribution assets of The Melton Corporation, a masonry materials and supplies distributor with one sales center location in California and one sales center location in Arizona. In October 2015, we acquired the distribution assets of Seaboard Industries, Inc., a swimming pool supply wholesale distributor with one sales center location in Connecticut and two sales center locations in New Jersey. In April 2015, we acquired certain distribution assets from Poolwerx Development LLC and opened a satellite sales center location serving South Mesa, Arizona.

In 2016, we completed the acquisition accounting for each of our 2015 acquisitions. These acquisitions did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations, either individually or in the aggregate

2014 Acquisitions

In February 2014, we acquired certain distribution assets of Atlantic Chemical & Aquatics Inc., a regional swimming pool products distributor based in Nova Scotia with two sales center locations serving the Maritime Provinces of Canada. In March 2014, we acquired certain distribution assets of DFW Stone Supply, LLC, a distributor of natural stone and rock products and masonry supplies with two sales center locations in the Dallas, Texas metropolitan area. In July 2014, we purchased a 60% controlling interest in PSL, a distributor of swimming pool and spa equipment, accessories and leisure products, with one sales center located in Brisbane, Australia. As part of this transaction, PSL acquired Niagara Pool Supplies (Niagara), a distributor of pool products, with two sales centers in New South Wales, Australia. In December 2014, we acquired certain distribution assets of St. Louis Hardscape Material & Supply, LLC, a hardscape and landscaping materials supplier with one location in St. Louis, Missouri. Because this acquisition was completed on December 31, 2014, we have included the results of this acquired company beginning January 1, 2015.

In 2015, we completed the acquisition accounting for each of our 2014 acquisitions. These acquisitions did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations, either individually or in the aggregate.




57




Note 3 - Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The table below presents changes in the carrying amount of goodwill and our accumulated impairment losses (in thousands):

Goodwill (gross) at December 31, 2014
$
183,190

Acquired goodwill
1,149

Foreign currency translation adjustments
(2,312
)
Goodwill (gross) at December 31, 2015
182,027

 
 
Accumulated impairment losses at December 31, 2014
(9,266
)
Goodwill impairment

Accumulated impairment losses at December 31, 2015
(9,266
)
 
 
Goodwill (net) at December 31, 2015
$
172,761

 
 
Goodwill (gross) at December 31, 2015
$
182,027

Acquired goodwill
12,696

Foreign currency translation adjustments
(49
)
Goodwill (gross) at December 31, 2016
194,674

 
 
Accumulated impairment losses at December 31, 2015
(9,266
)
Goodwill impairment
(613
)
Accumulated impairment losses at December 31, 2016
(9,879
)
 
 
Goodwill (net) at December 31, 2016
$
184,795


In the third quarter of 2016, we performed an interim goodwill impairment analysis for an at-risk reporting unit in Quebec, Canada. We have been monitoring this location’s results, which came in below expectations at the end of the 2016 pool season. Due to this impairment indicator, we performed an interim goodwill impairment analysis. We estimated the fair value of this reporting unit based on an income approach that incorporates our assumptions for determining the present value of future cash flows.  We projected future cash flows using management’s assumptions for sales growth rates, operating margins, discount rates and multiples. Because the carrying value of this reporting unit’s goodwill exceeded its estimated fair value, we recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge in Selling and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

In October 2016 and October 2015, we performed our annual goodwill impairment test and did not identify any goodwill impairment at the reporting unit level. As of October 1, 2016, we had 222 reporting units with allocated goodwill balances.  The highest goodwill balance was $5.7 million and the average goodwill balance was $0.8 million.



58



Other intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):

 
December 31,
 
2016
 
2015
Horizon tradename (indefinite life)
$
8,400

 
$
8,400

Pool Systems tradename and trademarks (indefinite lives)
1,023

 
1,040

National Pool Tile (NPT) tradename (20 year life)
1,500

 
1,500

Non-compete agreements (5 year weighted average useful life)
4,396

 
1,953

Patents (5 year weighted average useful life)
483

 
492

Other intangible assets
15,802

 
13,385

Less: Accumulated amortization
(2,476
)
 
(1,540
)
Other intangible assets, net
$
13,326

 
$
11,845


The Horizon and Pool Systems tradenames and trademarks have indefinite useful lives and are not subject to amortization.  However, we evaluate the useful lives of these intangible assets and test for impairment annually.  The NPT tradename, our non-compete agreements and our patents have finite useful lives and we amortize the estimated fair value of these agreements using the straight-line method over their respective useful lives. We have not identified any indicators of impairment related to these assets. The useful lives for our non-compete agreements are based on their contractual terms, and the useful lives for our patents are based on expected future cash flows. We recognize expenses related to patent renewal costs as incurred.

Other intangible amortization expense was $1.0 million in 2016, $0.4 million in 2015 and $0.8 million in 2014.

The table below presents estimated amortization expense for other intangible assets for the next five years (in thousands):

2017
 
$
888

2018
 
886

2019
 
747

2020
 
700

2021
 
219



59



Note 4 - Details of Certain Balance Sheet Accounts

The table below presents additional information regarding certain balance sheet accounts (in thousands):
 
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
Receivables, net:
 
 
 
 
Trade accounts
 
$
18,533

 
$
17,835

Vendor programs
 
44,842

 
38,444

Other, net
 
2,112

 
2,099

Total receivables
 
65,487

 
58,378

Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
 
(4,050
)
 
(4,205
)
Receivables, net
 
$
61,437

 
$
54,173

 
 
 
 
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets:
 
 
 
 
Prepaid expenses
 
$
13,584

 
$
11,919

Other current assets
 
1,734

 
27

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 
$
15,318

 
$
11,946

 
 
 
 
 
Property and equipment, net:
 
 
 
 

Land
 
$
1,685

 
$
1,925

Buildings
 
2,465

 
2,465

Leasehold improvements
 
38,348

 
33,518

Autos and trucks
 
53,371

 
35,832

Machinery and equipment
 
45,535

 
39,518

Computer equipment
 
39,251

 
39,271

Furniture and fixtures
 
9,951

 
9,164

Fixed assets in progress
 
2,065

 
6,173

Total property and equipment
 
192,671

 
167,866

Less: Accumulated depreciation
 
(109,381
)
 
(98,012
)
Property and equipment, net
 
$
83,290

 
$
69,854

 
 
 
 
 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities:
 
 
 
 

Salaries and payroll deductions
 
$
8,878

 
$
6,433

Performance-based compensation
 
32,226

 
29,090

Taxes payable
 
8,424

 
8,889

Other current liabilities
 
14,859

 
12,179

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
 
$
64,387

 
$
56,591



60



Note 5 - Debt

The table below presents the components of our debt as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

 
 
December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
Variable rate debt
 
 
 
 
Current portion of long-term debt:
 
 
 
 
Australian Seasonal Credit Facility (described below)
 
$
1,105

 
$
1,700

 
 
 
 
 
Long-term portion:
 
 
 
 
Revolving Credit Facility (described below)
 
354,549

 
273,015

Receivables Securitization Facility (described below)
 
83,500

 
55,000

Less: financing costs, net
 
1,112

 
1,670

Long-term debt, net
 
$
436,937

 
$
326,345

Total debt 
 
$
438,042

 
$
328,045


Revolving Credit Facility

On November 20, 2014, we, along with our wholly owned subsidiaries, SCP Distributors Canada Inc., as the Canadian Borrower, and SCP Pool B.V., as the Dutch Borrower, executed an amendment to our unsecured syndicated senior credit facility (the Credit Facility). The Credit Facility borrowing capacity remains $465.0 million under a five-year revolving credit facility. On November 20, 2015, we extended the maturity date of the agreement to November 20, 2020.

The Credit Facility includes sublimits for the issuance of swingline loans and standby letters of credit. Pursuant to an accordion feature, the aggregate maximum principal amount of the commitments under the Credit Facility may be increased at our request and with agreement by the lenders by up to $75.0 million, to a total of $540.0 million.  

Our obligations under the Credit Facility are guaranteed by substantially all of our existing and future direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries.  The Credit Facility contains terms and provisions (including representations, covenants and conditions) and events of default customary for transactions of this type.  If we default under the Credit Facility, the lenders may terminate their commitments under the Credit Facility and may require us to repay all amounts.

At December 31, 2016, there was $354.5 million outstanding and $110.5 million available for borrowing, subject to a $4.0 million standby letter of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility.  The weighted average effective interest rate for the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2016 was approximately 2.6%, excluding commitment fees.

Revolving borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest, at our option, at either of the following and, in each case, plus an applicable margin:

a.
a base rate, which is the highest of (i) the Wells Fargo Bank, National Association prime rate, (ii) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.500% and (iii) the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) Market Index Rate plus 1.000%; or
b.
LIBOR.

Borrowings by the Canadian Borrower bear interest, at the Canadian Borrower’s option, at either of the following and, in each case, plus an applicable margin:

a.
a base rate, which is the greatest of (i) the Canadian Reference Bank prime rate and (ii) the annual rate of interest equal to the sum of the Canadian Dealer Offered Rate (CDOR) plus 1.000%; or
b.
CDOR.

Borrowings by the Dutch Borrower bear interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin.


61



The interest rate margins on the borrowings and letters of credit are based on our leverage ratio and will range from 1.150% to 1.650% on CDOR, LIBOR and swingline loans, and from 0.150% to 0.650% on Base Rate and Canadian Base Rate loans.   Borrowings under the swingline loans are based on the LIBOR Market Index Rate (LMIR) plus any applicable margin.  We are also required to pay an annual facility fee ranging from 0.100% to 0.225%, depending on our leverage ratio.

Receivables Securitization Facility

On October 28, 2016, we and certain of our subsidiaries entered into an amendment of our two-year accounts receivable securitization facility (the Receivables Facility). As amended, the Receivables Facility has a peak seasonal funding capacity of up to $220.0 million between May 1 and June 30, which includes an additional seasonal funding capacity that is available between March 1 and July 31. Other funding capacities range from $65.0 million to $150.0 million throughout the remaining months of the year.

The Receivables Facility provides for the sale of certain of our receivables to a wholly owned subsidiary (the Securitization Subsidiary). The Securitization Subsidiary transfers variable undivided percentage interests in the receivables and related rights to certain third party financial institutions in exchange for cash proceeds, limited to the applicable funding capacities. Upon payment of the receivables by customers, rather than remitting to the financial institutions the amounts collected, we retain such collections as proceeds for the sale of new receivables until payments become due to the financial institutions.

The Receivables Facility is subject to terms and conditions (including representations, covenants and conditions precedent) customary for transactions of this type. Failure to maintain certain ratios or meet certain of these covenants could trigger an amortization event.

At December 31, 2016, there was $83.5 million outstanding under the Receivables Facility at a weighted average effective interest rate of 1.5%, excluding commitment fees.

Depending on the funding source used by the financial institutions to purchase the receivables, amounts outstanding under the Receivables Facility bear interest at one of the following and, in each case, plus an applicable margin of 0.75%:

a.
for financial institutions using the commercial paper market, commercial paper rates based on the applicable variable rates in the commercial paper market at the time of issuance; or
b.
for financial institutions not using the commercial paper market, LMIR.

We also pay an unused fee of 0.35% on the excess of the facility limit over the average daily capital outstanding. We pay this fee monthly in arrears.

Australian Seasonal Credit Facility

PSL utilizes the Australian Seasonal Credit Facility to supplement working capital needs during its peak season, which runs from July to March.  The arrangement provides a borrowing capacity of AU$3.0 million, and any amounts outstanding must be repaid by April 1.

Cash Pooling Arrangement

Certain of our foreign subsidiaries entered into a cash pooling arrangement with a financial institution for cash management purposes. This arrangement allows the participating subsidiaries to withdraw cash from the financial institution to the extent that aggregate cash deposits held by these subsidiaries are available at the financial institution. To the extent the participating subsidiaries are in an overdraft position, such overdrafts are recorded as short-term borrowings under a committed cash overdraft facility. These borrowings bear interest at a variable rate based on 3-month Euro Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR), plus a fixed margin. We also pay a commitment fee on the borrowing capacity of €10.0 million. This fee is paid annually in advance. As of December 31, 2016, there were no amounts outstanding under the overdraft facility.


62



Interest Rate Swaps

In 2016, we had five interest rate swap contracts in place to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on the Credit Facility.  Each of these swap contracts terminated on October 19, 2016.  These swaps converted the variable interest rates to fixed interest rates on borrowings under the Credit Facility. For these interest rate swaps, we recognized no gains or losses through income, nor was there any effect on income from hedge ineffectiveness over the term of these swap contracts. The following table provides additional details related to each of these swap contracts:

Derivative
 
Effective Date
 
Notional
Amount
(in millions)
 
Fixed
Interest
Rate
Interest rate swap 1
 
November 21, 2011
 
$
25.0

 
1.185
%
Interest rate swap 2
 
November 21, 2011
 
25.0

 
1.185
%
Interest rate swap 3
 
December 21, 2011
 
50.0

 
1.100
%
Interest rate swap 4
 
January 17, 2012
 
25.0

 
1.050
%
Interest rate swap 5
 
January 19, 2012
 
25.0

 
0.990
%

We currently have three interest rate swap contracts in place, which became effective on October 19, 2016. These swaps were previously forward-starting contracts that were amended in October 2015. These swaps were amended to bring the fixed rates per our forward-starting contracts in line with current market rates and extend the hedged period for future interest payments on our Credit Facility following the October 19, 2016 termination date of the swap contracts described above. Concurrent with this amendment of these contracts, we de-designated the original hedge arrangements and designated the amended forward-starting interest rate swap contracts as cash flow hedges. As amended, these swap contracts terminate on November 20, 2019.

In 2015, we recognized a benefit as a result of our determination of ineffectiveness for the period. In the first quarter of 2016, these forward-starting interest rate swaps were deemed highly effective, and the benefit previously recognized was reversed, resulting in $0.6 million in expense. There was no benefit or expense recognized in the second and third quarters of 2016 as these swaps continued to be highly effective for the periods. In the fourth quarter of 2016, we recognized a benefit of $0.5 million as a result of minimal ineffectiveness for that period. These amounts were recorded in Interest and other non-operating expenses, net on our Consolidated Statements of Income.

The following table provides additional details related to each of these amended swap contracts:

Derivative
 
Amendment Date
 
Notional
Amount
(in millions)
 
Fixed
Interest
Rate
Interest rate swap 6
 
October 1, 2015
 
$
75.0

 
2.273
%
Interest rate swap 7
 
October 1, 2015
 
25.0

 
2.111
%
Interest rate swap 8
 
October 1, 2015
 
50.0

 
2.111
%

To account for the de-designation of the original forward-starting swaps, we were required to freeze the amounts related to the changes in the fair values of these swaps, which are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). These unrealized losses, which total $3.7 million, are being amortized over the effective period of the original forward-starting interest rate swap contracts from October 2016 to September 2018. In the fourth quarter of 2016, we recorded expense of $0.4 million as amortization of the unrealized loss in Interest and other non-operating expenses, net.

In July 2016 we entered into a new forward-starting interest rate swap contract to extend the hedged period for future interest payments on our Credit Facility to its maturity date. This swap contract will convert the variable interest rate to a fixed interest rate on borrowings under the Credit Facility. This contract becomes effective on November 20, 2019 and terminates on November 20, 2020. The following table provides additional details related to this new swap contract:

Derivative
 
Inception Date
 
Notional
Amount
(in millions)
 
Fixed
Interest
Rate
Forward-starting interest rate swap
 
July 6, 2016
 
$
150.0

 
1.1425
%

63




The net difference between interest paid and interest received related to our swap agreements resulted in incremental interest expense of $1.3 million in 2016, $1.4 million in 2015 and $1.4 million in 2014

Failure of our swap counterparties would result in the loss of any potential benefit to us under our swap agreements. In this case, we would still be obligated to pay the variable interest payments underlying our debt agreements.  Additionally, failure of our swap counterparties would not eliminate our obligation to continue to make payments under our existing swap agreements if we continue to be in a net pay position.

Financial and Other Covenants

Financial covenants on the Credit Facility and Receivables Facility are closely aligned and include a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and maintenance of a maximum average total leverage ratio, which are our most restrictive covenants. The Credit Facility also limits the declaration and payment of dividends on our common stock to no more than 50% of the preceding year’s Net Income (as defined in the Credit Facility), provided no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing, or would result from the payment of dividends. Additionally, we may declare and pay quarterly dividends notwithstanding that the aggregate amount of dividends paid would be in excess of the 50% limit described above so long as (i) the amount per share of such dividends does not exceed the amount per share paid during the most recent fiscal year in which we were in compliance with the 50% limit and (ii) our Average Total Leverage Ratio is less than 3.00 to 1.00 both immediately before and after giving pro forma effect to such dividends. Further, dividends must be declared and paid in a manner consistent with our past practice.
  
Under the Credit Facility, we may repurchase shares of our common stock provided no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing, or would result from the repurchase of shares, and our maximum average total leverage ratio (determined on a pro forma basis) is less than 2.50 to 1.00. Other covenants include restrictions on our ability to grant liens, incur indebtedness, make investments, merge or consolidate, and sell or transfer assets.  Failure to comply with any of our financial covenants or any other terms of the Credit Facility could result in penalty payments, higher interest rates on our borrowings or the acceleration of the maturities of our outstanding debt.

As of December 31, 2016, we were in compliance with all covenants and financial ratio requirements related to the Credit Facility and the Receivables Facility.

Deferred Financing Costs

We capitalize financing costs we incur related to implementing and amending our debt arrangements. Upon adoption of ASU 2015-03, we now record these costs as a component of Long-term debt, net on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and continue to amortize them over the contractual life of the related debt arrangement. The table below summarizes changes in deferred financing costs for the past two years (in thousands):

 
 
December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
Deferred financing costs:
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of year
 
$
4,814

 
$
4,494

Financing costs deferred
 
69

 
320

Balance at end of year
 
4,883

 
4,814

 
 
 
 
 
Accumulated amortization of deferred financing costs
 
(3,771
)
 
(3,144
)
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization
 
$
1,112

 
$
1,670





64



Note 6 - Share-Based Compensation

Share-Based Plans

Current Plan

In May 2007, our stockholders approved the 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the 2007 LTIP), which authorizes the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors (the Board) to grant non-qualified stock options and restricted stock awards to employees, directors, consultants or advisors.  The 2007 LTIP replaced the 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which is discussed below, and the SCP Pool Non-Employee Directors Equity Incentive Plan, which was terminated in 2006 and had no stock options outstanding at December 31, 2016. In May 2016, our stockholders approved an amendment and restatement of the 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Amended 2007 LTIP) and increased the number of shares that may be issued to a total of 9,315,000 shares.  As of December 31, 2016, we had 4,808,577 shares available for future issuance including 1,278,350 shares that may be issued as restricted stock.

Stock options granted under the Amended 2007 LTIP have an exercise price equal to our stock’s closing market price on the grant date and expire ten years from the grant date. Restricted stock awards granted under the Amended 2007 LTIP are issued at no cost to the grantee.  Both stock options and restricted stock awards vest over time depending on an employee’s length of service with the Company.  Share-based awards to our employees generally vest either five years from the grant date or on a three/five year split vest schedule, where half of the awards vest three years from the grant date and the remainder of the awards vest five years from the grant date. Share‑based awards to the chairman of the Board and our non-employee directors vest one year from the grant date.

Beginning with 2016 grants, certain restricted stock awards to our employees contain performance-based criteria in addition to the service-based vesting criteria discussed above. The award provides for a three-year performance period, and the performance metric may be achieved during any consecutive three-year period beginning January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2020. If the performance metric fails to be met by the end of the performance period ending December 31, 2020, then all shares of performance-based restricted stock will be immediately forfeited and canceled. We have concluded attainment of these performance conditions to be probable since the grant date.

Preceding Plans

In May 2002, our stockholders approved the 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the 2002 Plan), which authorized the Board to grant stock options and restricted stock awards to employees, agents, consultants or independent contractors. In May 2004, our stockholders approved an amendment to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2002 Plan from 1,575,000 to 2,700,000 shares.  Granted stock options have an exercise price equal to our stock’s market price on the grant date. These options generally vest either five years from the grant date or on a three/five year split vest schedule, as described above. These options expire ten years from the grant date.  In May 2007, the Board suspended the 2002 Plan. Options granted prior to the suspension were not affected by this action.

Stock Option Awards

The following table summarizes stock option activity under our share-based plans for the year ended December 31, 2016:

 
 
Shares
 
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(Years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
Balance at December 31, 2015
 
2,741,745

 
$
31.50

 
 
 
 
Granted
 
155,225

 
80.95

 
 
 
 

Less: Exercised
 
343,237

 
30.12

 
 
 
 

           Forfeited
 
2,850

 
28.47

 
 
 
 

Balance at December 31, 2016
 
2,550,883

 
$
34.70

 
4.22
 
$
177,637,707

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exercisable at December 31, 2016
 
1,800,183

 
$
24.19

 
2.94
 
$
144,276,703



65



The following table presents information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2016:

 
 
Outstanding
Stock Options
 
Exercisable
Stock Options
Range of Exercise Prices
 
Shares
 
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(Years)
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price
 
Shares
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price
$ 18.00 to $ 20.34
 
1,100,811

 
2.22
 
$
19.65

 
1,100,811

 
$
19.65

$ 20.35 to $ 45.61
 
947,497

 
4.48
 
33.83

 
696,372

 
31.22

$ 45.62 to $ 102.41
 
502,575

 
8.13
 
69.30

 
3,000

 
59.23

 
 
2,550,883

 
4.22
 
$
34.70

 
1,800,183

 
$
24.19


The following table summarizes the cash proceeds and tax benefits realized from the exercise of stock options:

 
 
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except share amounts)
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Options exercised
 
343,237

 
543,028

 
441,833

Cash proceeds
 
$
10,340

 
$
17,137

 
$
12,451

Intrinsic value of options exercised
 
$
21,094

 
$
22,676

 
$
13,132

Tax benefits realized
 
$
7,891

 
$
8,326

 
$
5,018


We estimated the fair value of employee stock option awards at the grant date based on the assumptions summarized in the following table:
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
(Weighted average)
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Expected volatility
 
29.7
%
 
 
33.8
%
 
 
37.7
%
 
Expected term
 
7.1

years
 
7.2

years
 
7.2

years
Risk-free interest rate
 
1.75
%
 
 
1.95
%
 
 
2.26
%
 
Expected dividend yield
 
1.5
%
 
 
1.5
%
 
 
1.5
%
 
Grant date fair value
 
$
22.86

 
 
$
22.57

 
 
$
21.07

 

We calculated expected volatility over the expected term of the awards based on the historical volatility of our common stock.  We use weekly price observations for our historical volatility calculation because we believe that they provide the most appropriate measurement of volatility given the trading patterns of our common stock.  We estimated the expected term based on the vesting period of the awards and our historical exercise activity for awards with similar characteristics. The weighted average expected term is impacted by a higher expected term estimate for stock option awards granted to our named executive officers.  The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term approximating the expected term of the option. We determined the expected dividend yield based on the anticipated dividends over the expected term.

For purposes of recognizing share-based compensation expense, we ratably expense the estimated fair value of employee stock options over the options’ requisite service period. The requisite service period for our share-based awards is either the vesting period, or if shorter, the period from the grant date to the date that employees meet the retirement provisions of our share-based award agreements. We recognize compensation cost for awards with graded vesting using the graded vesting recognition method.


66



The following table presents the total share-based compensation expense for stock option awards and the related recognized tax benefits for the past three years (in thousands):

 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Share-based compensation expense
 
$
3,735

 
$
3,688

 
$
3,632

Recognized tax benefits
 
1,409

 
1,331

 
1,388


At December 31, 2016, the unamortized compensation expense related to stock option awards totaled $3.5 million.  We anticipate that this expense will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.7 years.

Restricted Stock Awards

The table below presents restricted stock awards activity under our share-based plans for the year ended December 31, 2016:

 
 
Shares
 
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value
Balance unvested at December 31, 2015
 
301,760

 
$
51.18

Granted (at market price)(1)
 
80,579

 
83.34

Less: Vested
 
95,420

 
38.70

Forfeited
 
1,900

 
69.55

Balance unvested at December 31, 2016
 
285,019

 
$
64.33


(1) The majority of these shares contain performance-based vesting conditions.

At December 31, 2016, the unamortized compensation expense related to the restricted stock awards totaled $3.8 million.  We anticipate that this expense will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years.

The table below presents the total number of restricted stock awards that vested for the past three years and the related fair value of those awards (in thousands, except share amounts):

 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Shares vested
 
95,420

 
147,619

 
212,794

Fair value of restricted stock awards vested
 
$
7,960

 
$
10,182

 
$
12,354


The following table presents the total share-based compensation expense for restricted stock awards for the past three years (in thousands):

 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Share-based compensation expense
 
$
5,993

 
$
5,513

 
$
5,203


Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In March 1998, the Board adopted the SCP Pool Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the ESPP). Under the ESPP, employees who meet minimum age and length of service requirements may purchase stock at 85% of the lower of:

a.
as amended in May 2016, the closing price of our common stock at the end of a six month plan period ending either July 31 or January 31 (prior to the amendment, the six month plan period ended on June 30 or December 31); or
b.
the average of the beginning and ending closing prices of our common stock for such six month period.


67



No more than 956,250 shares of our common stock may be issued under the ESPP. For the one six month offering period in 2016 and the two six month offering periods in 2015 and 2014, our employees purchased the following aggregate number of shares:

2016
 
2015
 
2014
8,649

 
22,555

 
22,508


The grant date fair value for the most recent ESPP purchase period ended June 30, 2016 was $20.42 per share.  Share-based compensation expense related to our ESPP was $0.2 million in 2016, $0.3 million in 2015 and $0.2 million in 2014.

Note 7 - Income Taxes

Income before income taxes and equity earnings is attributable to the following jurisdictions (in thousands):

  
 
Year Ended December 31,
  
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
United States
 
$
234,646

 
$
203,269

 
$
178,497

Foreign
 
6,732

 
4,881

 
2,888

Total
 
$
241,378

 
$
208,150

 
$
181,385


The provision for income taxes consisted of the following (in thousands):

 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Current:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal
 
$
77,000

 
$
65,676

 
$
54,447

State and other
 
12,182

 
10,263

 
9,126

Total current provision for income taxes
 
89,182

 
75,939

 
63,573

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal
 
4,079

 
4,568

 
6,942

State and other
 
(330
)
 
(370
)
 
44

Total deferred provision for income taxes
 
3,749

 
4,198

 
6,986

Provision for income taxes
 
$
92,931

 
$
80,137

 
$
70,559


A reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory tax rate to our effective tax rate on Income before income taxes and equity earnings is as follows:

 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Federal statutory rate
 
35.00
%
 
35.00
%
 
35.00
%
Change in valuation allowance
 
0.10

 
0.20

 
0.43

Other, primarily state income tax rate
 
3.40

 
3.30

 
3.47

Total effective tax rate
 
38.50
%
 
38.50
%
 
38.90
%


68



The table below presents the components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities (in thousands):

 
 
December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
Deferred tax assets:
 
 
 
 
Product inventories
 
$
7,010

 
$
7,101

Accrued expenses
 
3,978

 
3,303

Allowance for doubtful accounts
 
396

 
606

Total current
 
11,384

 
11,010

Component reclassified for net presentation
 
(5,368
)
 
(5,480
)
Total current, net
 
6,016

 
5,530

 
 
 
 
 
Leases
 
1,920

 
1,786

Share-based compensation
 
13,778

 
13,422

Uncertain tax positions
 
2,746

 
2,092

Net operating losses
 
5,735

 
5,485

Interest rate swaps
 
674

 
1,513

Other
 
2,465

 
1,159

Total non-current
 
27,318

 
25,457

Less: Valuation allowance
 
(5,735
)
 
(5,485
)
Component reclassified for net presentation
 
(20,781
)
 
(18,755
)
Total non-current, net
 
802

 
1,217

 
 
 
 
 
Total deferred tax assets
 
6,818

 
6,747

 
 
 
 
 
Deferred tax liabilities:
 


 


Trade discounts on purchases
 
2,698

 
3,001

Prepaid expenses
 
2,670

 
2,479

Total current
 
5,368

 
5,480

Component reclassified for net presentation
 
(5,368
)
 
(5,480
)
Total current, net
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
Intangible assets, primarily goodwill
 
42,930

 
40,197

Depreciation
 
12,326

 
8,366

Total non-current
 
55,256

 
48,563

Component reclassified for net presentation
 
(20,781
)
 
(18,755
)
Total non-current, net
 
34,475

 
29,808

 
 
 
 
 
Total deferred tax liabilities
 
34,475

 
29,808

 
 
 
 
 
Net deferred tax liability
 
$
27,657

 
$
23,061



69



At December 31, 2016, certain of our international subsidiaries had tax loss carryforwards totaling approximately $22.2 million, which expire in various years after 2017.  Deferred tax assets related to the tax loss carryforwards of these international subsidiaries were $5.7 million as of December 31, 2016 and $5.5 million as of December 31, 2015.  We have recorded a corresponding valuation allowance of $5.7 million and $5.5 million in the respective years.

Upon adoption of ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, we will classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent on the balance sheet rather than separately presenting net deferred tax assets or liabilities as current or noncurrent. Also, we will no longer allocate valuation allowances between current and noncurrent deferred tax assets because those allowances will also be required to be classified as noncurrent. ASU 2015-17 will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, which for us will be in the period beginning January 1, 2017. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-17 will have an impact on our results of operations, but it will change the presentation of our financial position and disclosures related to deferred tax assets and liabilities.

We reduce federal and state income taxes payable by the tax benefits associated with the exercise of nonqualified stock options and the lapse of restrictions on restricted stock awards.  To the extent realized tax deductions exceed the amount of previously recognized deferred tax benefits related to share-based compensation, we record an excess tax benefit in stockholders’ equity. We recorded excess tax benefits of $7.4 million in 2016 and $7.7 million in 2015. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, we will be required to record all excess tax benefits or deficiencies as income tax benefit or expense in the income statement. The adoption of this guidance will likely have a material positive impact on our income tax provision in periods in which employees elect to exercise their vested stock options or restrictions on share-based awards lapse. ASU 2016-09 will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, which for us will be in the period beginning January 1, 2017.

As of December 31, 2016, United States income taxes were not provided on earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, as we have invested or expect to invest the undistributed earnings indefinitely.  If in the future these earnings are repatriated to the United States, or if we determine that the earnings will be remitted in the foreseeable future, additional income tax provisions may be required. Determining the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability on these undistributed earnings is not practicable due to the complexity of tax laws and regulations and the varying circumstances, tax treatments and timing of any future repatriation.
 
We hold, through our affiliates, cash balances in the countries in which we operate, including amounts held outside the United States. Most of the amounts held outside the United States could be repatriated to the United States, but, under current law, may be subject to United States federal income taxes, less applicable foreign tax credits.  Repatriation of some foreign balances is restricted by local laws including the imposition of withholding taxes in some jurisdictions. We have not provided for the United States federal tax liability on these amounts, and for financial statement purposes, these foreign cash balances are considered indefinitely reinvested as of December 31, 2016 and are intended to be used to fund current cash flow needs in the countries where held.

The following table summarizes the activity related to uncertain tax positions for the past three years (in thousands):

 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Balance at beginning of year
 
$
5,978

 
$
4,690

 
$
3,837

Increases for tax positions taken during a prior period
 
10

 
410

 

Increases for tax positions taken during the current period
 
2,819

 
1,782

 
1,664

Decreases resulting from the expiration of the statute of limitations
 
961

 
904

 
811

Decreases relating to settlements
 

 

 

Balance at end of year
 
$
7,846

 
$
5,978

 
$
4,690


The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would decrease the effective tax rate was $5.1 million at December 31, 2016 and $3.9 million at December 31, 2015.

We record interest expense related to unrecognized tax benefits in Interest and other non-operating expenses, net, while we record related penalties in Selling and administrative expenses on our Consolidated Statements of Income.  For unrecognized tax benefits, we had interest expense of $0.2 million in 2016, interest expense $0.1 million in 2015 and minimal interest expense in 2014.  Accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $0.7 million at December 31, 2016 and $0.5 million at December 31, 2015.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions.  With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2013.

70




Note 8 - Earnings Per Share

The table below presents the computation of earnings per share, including the reconciliation of basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding (in thousands, except per share data):

 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Net income
 
$
148,603

 
$
128,224

 
$
111,030

Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
352

 
51

 
(338
)
Net income attributable to Pool Corporation
 
$
148,955

 
$
128,275

 
$
110,692

Weighted average shares outstanding:
 
 
 
 

 
 

Basic
 
41,872

 
43,105

 
44,281

Effect of dilutive securities:
 
 
 
 

 
 

Stock options and employee stock purchase plan
 
1,112

 
1,149

 
1,160

Diluted
 
42,984

 
44,254

 
45,441

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
 
$
3.56

 
$
2.98

 
$
2.50

Diluted
 
$
3.47

 
$
2.90

 
$
2.44

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Anti-dilutive stock options excluded from diluted earnings per share computations (1)
 
1

 

 
169


(1) 
Since these options have exercise prices that are higher than the average market prices of our common stock, including them in the calculation would have an anti-dilutive effect on earnings per share.

Note 9 - Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

We lease facilities for our corporate office, sales centers and centralized shipping locations under operating leases that expire in various years through 2027. Most of our leases contain renewal options, some of which involve rate increases. For leases with step rent provisions whereby the rental payments increase incrementally over the life of the lease, we recognize the total minimum lease payments on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term. The table below presents rent expenses associated with facility, vehicle and equipment operating leases for the past three years (in thousands):

2016
 
2015
 
2014
$
63,940

 
$
60,129

 
$
60,214


The table below sets forth the approximate future minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2016 related to non-cancelable facility operating leases and the non-cancelable portion of certain equipment operating leases with initial terms of one year or more (in thousands):

2017
 
$
47,324

2018
 
39,908

2019
 
33,088

2020
 
26,211

2021
 
15,955

Thereafter
 
19,890



71


Upon adoption of ASU 2016-02, Leases, we will be required to record most leases on our balance sheets and recognize expenses in a manner similar to current guidance. We will also be required to provide enhanced disclosures related to our lease agreements. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The guidance is required to be applied using a modified retrospective approach. We are currently evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-02 will have on our financial position, results of operations and related disclosures.

Contingencies

From time to time, we are subject to various claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, including product liability, personal injury, commercial, contract and employment matters. Each quarter, we evaluate developments related to claims and litigation and record a liability if we deem a loss to be probable and estimable. When evaluating these matters for accrual and disclosure, we consider factors such as historical experience, specific facts and claims asserted, the likelihood we will prevail and the magnitude of any potential loss. The outcome of any litigation is inherently unpredictable. Based on currently available facts, we do not believe that the ultimate resolution of any of these claims and litigation matters will have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. We do not believe our exposure for any of these matters is material for disclosure, either individually or in the aggregate.

Note 10 - Related Party Transactions

Policy

Our policy for related party transactions is included in our written Audit Committee Charter.  This policy requires that our Audit Committee review and approve all related party transactions required to be disclosed in our Annual Proxy Statement or required to be approved based on NASDAQ rules.

Transactions

In May 2005, we acquired a 50% membership interest in NCC through a $1.1 million cash contribution.  NCC owns and operates an office building in Covington, Louisiana.  We lease corporate and administrative offices from NCC, occupying approximately 54,800 square feet of office space.  In May 2005 we amended the lease agreement, which had a ten year term. In June 2013, we exercised an option to extend the term of a portion of the lease agreement through May 2020. In March 2015 we exercised a second option to extend the term of the lease agreement through May 2025.  As of December 31, 2016, we pay rent of $86,767 per month.

In January 2002, we entered into a lease agreement with S&C Development, LLC (S&C) for additional warehouse space adjacent to our Mandeville, Louisiana sales center.  The sole owner of S&C is A. David Cook, a Pool Corporation executive officer.  This lease expired in November 2014 and we relocated this sales center to a new facility leased from an unrelated third party.  

The table below presents rent expense associated with these leases for the past three years (in thousands):

 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
NCC
 
$
1,035

 
$
1,016

 
$
989

Other
 

 

 
64

Total
 
$
1,035

 
$
1,016

 
$
1,053


Note 11 - Employee Benefit Plans

We offer a 401(k) savings and retirement plan, which is a defined contribution plan and provides benefits for substantially all employees who meet length of service requirements. Eligible employees are able to contribute up to 75% of their compensation, subject to the federal dollar limit. For plan participants, we provide a matching contribution. We contribute a total maximum match on employee contributions of up to 4% of their compensation, with a 100% match on the first 3% of compensation deferred and a 50% match on deferrals between 3% and 5% of compensation. We also offer defined contribution plans for certain of our international entities. The plan funding is calculated as a percentage of the employee’s earnings and in compliance with local laws and practices. The related expense is not material and is included in the matching contributions - defined contribution plans line item in the table below.


72


We have a nonqualified deferred compensation plan that allows certain employees who occupy key management positions to defer salary and bonus amounts.  This plan also provides a matching contribution similar to that provided under our 401(k) plan to the extent that a participant’s contributions to the 401(k) plan are limited by IRS deferral and compensation limitations. The total combined company matching contribution provided to a participant under the 401(k) plan and the nonqualified deferred compensation plan for any one year may not exceed 4% of a participant’s salary and bonus.  The employee and company matching contributions are invested in certain equity and fixed income securities based on individual employee elections.

The table below sets forth our matching contributions for the past three years (in thousands):

 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Matching contributions - defined contribution plans
 
$
5,817

 
$
5,583

 
$
5,235

Matching contributions - deferred compensation plan
 
194

 
218

 
233


Note 12 - Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

The table below summarizes the unaudited quarterly results of operations for the past two years (in thousands, except per share data):

  
Quarter
  
2016
 
2015
  
First
 
Second
 
Third
 
Fourth
 
First
 
Second
 
Third
 
Fourth
Net sales
$
515,250

 
$
918,889

 
$
691,429

 
$
445,235

 
$
450,430

 
$
851,855

 
$
645,779

 
$
415,075

Gross profit
143,023

 
270,736

 
199,551

 
127,777

 
124,801

 
248,260

 
184,288

 
118,295

Net income
16,363

 
85,247

 
44,421

 
2,572

 
8,433

 
77,809

 
39,403

 
2,579

Net income attributable to Pool Corporation
16,371

 
85,435

 
44,534

 
2,615

 
8,419

 
77,924

 
39,447

 
2,486

Earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Basic
$
0.39

 
$
2.03

 
$
1.06

 
$
0.06

 
$
0.19

 
$
1.80

 
$
0.92

 
$
0.06

Diluted
$
0.38

 
$
1.98

 
$
1.03

 
$
0.06

 
$
0.19

 
$
1.75

 
$
0.90

 
$
0.06


The sum of basic and diluted earnings per share for each of the quarters may not equal the total basic and diluted earnings per share for the annual periods because of rounding differences and a difference in the way that in-the-money stock options are considered from quarter to quarter. 



73



Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures

The term “disclosure controls and procedures” is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act). The rules refer to the controls and other procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Act is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  As of December 31, 2016, management, including the CEO and CFO, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that as of December 31, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

We maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting that is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Based on the most recent evaluation, we have concluded that no change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



74



Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
Pool Corporation’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of published financial statements.  All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Any evaluation or projection of effectiveness to future periods is also subject to risk that controls may become inadequate due to changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Pool Corporation’s management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 Framework). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2016, Pool Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.

The independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K has issued a report on Pool Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting. This report appears below.



75



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Pool Corporation

We have audited Pool Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (the COSO criteria). Pool Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Pool Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Pool Corporation as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of Pool Corporation for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, and our report dated February 24, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
 
                                eysiga07.jpg
New Orleans, Louisiana
February 24, 2017



76



Item 9B.  Other Information

Not applicable.

PART III.

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Incorporated by reference to Pool Corporation’s 2017 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC.

Item 11.  Executive Compensation

Incorporated by reference to Pool Corporation’s 2017 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC.

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Incorporated by reference to Pool Corporation’s 2017 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC.

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Incorporated by reference to Pool Corporation’s 2017 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC.

Item 14.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Incorporated by reference to Pool Corporation’s 2017 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC.


77



PART IV.

Item 15.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a)
The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(1)
Consolidated Financial Statements:
 
 
Page
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(2)
Financial Statement Schedules.
 
 
 
All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or are not required or because the required information is provided in our Consolidated Financial Statements or accompanying Notes included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
 
 
(3)
The exhibits listed in the Index to Exhibits.



Item 16.  Form 10-K Summary

None


78



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on February 24, 2017.

 
POOL CORPORATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ WILSON B. SEXTON
 
Wilson B. Sexton, Chairman of the Board
 
and Director

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities indicated on February 24, 2017.

Signature:
Title:
 
 
/s/ WILSON B. SEXTON
 
Wilson B. Sexton
Chairman of the Board and Director
 
 
/s/ MANUEL J. PEREZ DE LA MESA
 
Manuel J. Perez de la Mesa
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
 
 
/s/ MARK W. JOSLIN
 
Mark W. Joslin
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
/s/ MELANIE M. HOUSEY HART
 
Melanie M. Housey Hart
Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
 
 
/s/ ANDREW W. CODE
 
Andrew W. Code
Director
 
 
  /s/ TIMOTHY M. GRAVEN
 
  Timothy M. Graven
Director
 
 
/s/ HARLAN F. SEYMOUR
 
Harlan F. Seymour
Director
 
 
/s/ ROBERT C. SLEDD
 
Robert C. Sledd
Director
 
 
/s/ JOHN E. STOKELY
 
John E. Stokely
Director
 
 
/s/ DAVID G. WHALEN
 
David G. Whalen
Director




INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 
 
 
 
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
No.
 
Description
 
Filed
with this
Form 10-K
 
Form
 
File No.
 
Date Filed
3.1
 
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company.
 
 
 
10-Q
 
000-26640
 
08/09/2006
3.2
 
Restated Composite Bylaws of the Company.
 
 
 
8-K
 
000-26640
 
12/20/2012
4.1
 
Form of certificate representing shares of common stock of the Company.
 
 
 
8-K
 
000-26640
 
05/19/2006
10.1
*
Amended and Restated SCP Pool Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
 
 
 
8-K
 
000-26640
 
05/06/2016
10.2
*
Amended and Restated SCP Pool Corporation 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
 
 
 
10-K
 
000-26640
 
03/01/2005
10.3
*
Form of Stock Option Agreement under 2002 Long‑Term Incentive Plan.
 
 
 
10-K
 
000-26640
 
03/01/2005
10.4
*
Pool Corporation Amended and Restated 2007 Long‑Term Incentive Plan.
 
 
 
8-K
 
000-26640
 
05/06/2016
10.5
*
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Employees under the Amended and Restated 2007 Long‑Term Incentive Plan.
 
 
 
10-K
 
000-26640
 
02/26/2015
10.6
*
Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Agreement under the Pool Corporation Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
 
 
10-K
 
000-26640
 
02/26/2016
10.7
*
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Directors under the Amended and Restated 2007 Long‑Term Incentive Plan.
 
 
 
8-K
 
000-26640
 
05/06/2009
10.8
*
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Directors under the Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
 
 
 
8-K
 
000-26640
 
05/06/2009
10.9
*
Form of Employment Agreement.
 
 
 
10-K
 
000-26640
 
03/18/2003
10.10
*
Employment Agreement, dated January 25, 1999, among SCP Pool Corporation, South Central Pool Supply, Inc. and Manuel J. Perez de la Mesa.
 
 
 
10-K
 
000-26640
 
03/31/1999
10.11
*
Employment Agreement, dated January 17, 2003, between SCP Distributors, LLC and
A. David Cook.
 
 
 
10-K
 
000-26640
 
03/01/2005
*
Employment Agreement, dated December 20, 2016, between SCP Distributors, LLC and Peter D. Arvan.
 
X
 
10-K
 
000-26640
 
02/24/2017
10.13
*
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors.
 
 
 
10-K
 
000-26640
 
03/01/2010
10.14
*
Form of Indemnity Agreement for Directors and Officers.
 
 
 
10-Q
 
000-26640
 
10/29/2004
10.15
 
Lease Agreement (Mandeville Warehouse) entered into as of January 16, 2002, by and between S&C Development Company, LLC and SCP Distributors, LLC, as amended by First Amendment entered into as of February 11, 2002 by and between S&C Development Company, LLC and SCP Distributors, LLC,
 
 
 
10-Q
 
 
000-26640
 
 
07/30/2004
 
10.16
 
as amended by Second Amendment entered into as of January 16, 2007 by and between S&C Development Company, LLC and SCP Distributors, LLC.
 
 
 
10-K
 
000-26640
 
03/01/2007
10.17
 
as amended by Third Amendment entered into as of October 7, 2013 by and between S&C Development Company, LLC and SCP Distributors, LLC.
 
 
 
10-K
 
000-26640
 
02/27/2014
10.18
*
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan Basic Plan Document, dated March 1, 2005.
 
 
 
10-Q
 
000-26640
 
04/29/2005




 
 
 
 
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
No.
 
Description
 
Filed
with this
Form 10-K
 
Form
 
File No.
 
Date Filed
10.19
*
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan Adoption Agreement by and among SCP Distributors, L.L.C., Superior Pool Products, L.L.C. and Cypress, Inc., dated March 1, 2005.
 
 
 
10-Q
 
000-26640
 
04/29/2005
10.20
 
Trust Agreement by and among SCP Distributors, L.L.C., Superior Pool Products, L.L.C. and Cypress, Inc. and T. Rowe Price Trust Company, dated March 1, 2005.
 
 
 
10-Q
 
000-26640
 
04/29/2005
10.21
*
Pool Corporation Executive Officer Annual Incentive Plan
 
 
 
8-K
 
000-26640
 
05/06/2016
10.22
 
Credit Agreement dated as of October 19, 2011, among Pool Corporation, as US Borrower, SCP Distributors Canada Inc., as Canadian Borrower, SCP Pool B.V., as Dutch Borrower, the Lenders, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Swingline Lender and Issuing Lender, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC, as joint Lead Arrangers and joint Bookrunners, Bank of America, N.A., Regions Bank and Capital One, N.A., as Documentation Agents, and Branch Banking and Trust Company, Comerica Bank and Union Bank, N.A.
 
 
 
10-Q
 
000-26640
 
10/31/2011
10.23
 
as amended by Second Amendment entered into as of April 1, 2013.
 
 
 
10-Q
 
000-26640
 
07/31/2013
10.24
 
as amended by Third Amendment entered into as of June 14, 2013.
 
 
 
10-Q
 
000-26640
 
07/31/2013
10.25
 
as amended by Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement and First Amendment to Subsidiary Guaranty Agreement entered into as of September 20, 2013.
 
 
 
8-K
 
000-26640
 
09/24/2013
10.26
 
as amended by Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement entered into as of July 25, 2014.
 
 
 
10-Q
 
000-26640
 
10/30/2014
10.27
 
as amended by Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement entered into as of November 20, 2014.
 
 
 
8-K
 
000-26640
 
11/25/2014
10.28
 
Consent to Extension of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement entered into as of November 20, 2015.
 
 
 
8-K
 
000-26640
 
11/20/2015
10.29
*
Pool Corporation Strategic Plan Incentive Program.
 
 
 
8-K
 
000-26640
 
05/06/2016
10.30
 
Receivables Sale and Contribution Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2013, between SCP Distributors LLC, Horizon Distributors, Inc., Superior Pool Products LLC and Poolfx Supply LLC, as Originators and Superior Commerce LLC, as Buyer.
 
 
 
8-K
 
000-26640
 
10/17/2013
10.31
 
Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2013, among Superior Commerce LLC as Seller, SCP Distributors LLC, as the Servicer, the Purchasers from time to time thereto, The Bank of Tokyo‑Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch, as the Victory Group Co-Agent and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Wells Group Co-Agent and as Administrative Agent.
 
 
 
8-K
 
000-26640
 
10/17/2013
10.32
 
as amended by Second Amendment to the Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of June 25, 2014.
 
 
 
10-Q
 
000-26640
 
07/30/2014
10.33
 
as amended by Third Amendment to the Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of October 24, 2014.
 
 
 
8-K
 
000-26640
 
10/28/2014




 
 
 
 
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
No.
 
Description
 
Filed
with this
Form 10-K
 
Form
 
File No.
 
Date Filed
10.34
 
as amended by Fourth Amendment to the Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of October 1, 2015.
 
 
 
8-K
 
000-26640
 
10/20/2015
10.35
 
as amended by Fifth Amendment to the Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of October 15, 2015.
 
 
 
8-K
 
000-26640
 
10/20/2015
10.36
 
as amended by Sixth Amendment to the Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of October 28, 2016.
 
 
 
8-K
 
000-26640
 
10/31/2016
10.37
 
Performance Undertaking, dated as of October 11, 2013, by and between Pool Corporation and Superior Commerce LLC.
 
 
 
8-K
 
000-26640
 
10/17/2013
 
Subsidiaries of the registrant.
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Certification by Mark W. Joslin pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Certification by Manuel J. Perez de la Mesa pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Certification by Manuel J. Perez de la Mesa and Mark W. Joslin pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.INS
+
XBRL Instance Document
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.SCH
+
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.CAL
+
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.DEF
+
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.LAB
+
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.PRE
+
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 

*
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement

+
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following items formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language):
1.
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014;
2.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014;
3.
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015;
4.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014;
5.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014; and
6.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.