1.     Description of Business and Basis of Presentation

Organization and Basis of Presentation

Cesca Therapeutics Inc. (“Cesca”, or the “Company”) develops and markets integrated cellular therapies and delivery systems that advance the safe and effective practice of regenerative medicine. Cesca is a leader in developing and manufacturing automated blood and bone marrow processing systems that enable the separation, processing and preservation of cell and tissue therapy products.

Reverse Stock Split

On March 4, 2016, the Company affected a one (1) for twenty (20) reverse split of its issued and outstanding common stock. There were no changes to its authorized number of shares of common stock of 350,000,000.

All historical share amounts disclosed herein have been retroactively recast to reflect the reverse split. No fractional shares were issued; fractional shares of common stock were rounded up to the nearest whole share.

Liquidity and Going Concern

At September 30, 2016, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $5,608 and working capital of $8,232. The Company has incurred recurring operating losses and as of September 30, 2016 had an accumulated deficit of $178,707. The Company has primarily financed operations through the sale of equity securities, convertible debentures and the sale of certain non-core assets.

The Company will need additional funding to support its phase III Critical Limb Ischemia (“CLIRST III”) trial. As such, management has been exploring additional funding sources including strategic partner relationships. The Company cannot assure that such funding will be available on a timely basis, in needed quantities, or on favorable terms, if at all. If the Company is unable to generate sufficient revenues or obtain additional funds for its working capital needs, the Company will have to further scale-back operations.

Because of recurring and expected operating losses, its cash balance and severance payments due to the departing Chief Executive Officer, see Subsequent Event footnote 7, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. These condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recovery of the recorded assets or the classification of the liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.    

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cesca and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, TotipotentRX Cell Therapy, Pvt. Ltd. and TotipotentSC Scientific Product Pvt. Ltd. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.

Interim Reporting

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and regulations and accounting principles applicable for interim periods. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Events subsequent to the balance sheet date have been evaluated for inclusion in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements through the date of issuance. Operating results for the three month period ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending June 30, 2017. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016.

2.     Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition

Revenues from the sale of the Company’s products and services are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred (or services have been rendered), the price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company generally ships products F.O.B. shipping point. There is no conditional evaluation on any product sold and recognized as revenue. Amounts billed in excess of revenue recognized are recorded as deferred revenue on the balance sheet.

There is no right of return provided for distributors or customers. For sales of products made to distributors, the Company considers a number of factors in determining whether revenue is recognized upon transfer of title to the distributor, or when payment is received. These factors include, but are not limited to, whether the payment terms offered to the distributor are considered to be non-standard, the distributor history of adhering to the terms of its contractual arrangements with us, the level of inventories maintained by the distributor, whether the Company has a pattern of granting concessions for the benefit of the distributor, and whether there are other conditions that may indicate that the sale to the distributor is not substantive. The Company currently recognizes revenue primarily on the sell-in method with its distributors.

Revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables are divided into units of accounting if certain criteria are met, including whether the deliverable item(s) has (have) value to the customer on a stand-alone basis. Revenue for each unit of accounting is recognized as the unit of accounting is delivered. Arrangement consideration is allocated to each unit of accounting based upon the relative estimated selling prices of the separate units of accounting contained within an arrangement containing multiple deliverables. Estimated selling prices are determined using vendor specific objective evidence of value (“VSOE”), when available, or an estimate of selling price when VSOE is not available for a given unit of accounting. Significant inputs for the estimates of the selling price of separate units of accounting include market and pricing trends and a customer’s geographic location. The Company accounts for training and installation, and service agreements and the collection, processing and testing of the umbilical cord blood and the storage as separate units of accounting.

Service revenue generated from contracts for providing maintenance of equipment is amortized over the life of the agreement. Revenue generated from storage contracts is deferred and recorded ratably over the life of the agreement, up to 21 years. All other service revenue is recognized at the time the service is completed.

Revenues are net of normal discounts. Shipping and handling fees billed to customers are included in net revenues, while the related costs are included in cost of revenues.

Fair Value Measurements

In accordance with ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date.

The guidance also establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability and are developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the factors that market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability. The guidance establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting the reporting entity’s own assumptions.

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short duration. The fair value of the Company’s derivative obligation liability is classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy since the valuation model of the derivative obligation is based on unobservable inputs.

Segment Reporting

The Company has one reportable business segment: the research, development and commercialization of devices and cell-based therapies for regenerative medicine.

Net Loss per Share

Net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The calculation of the basic and diluted earnings per share is the same for all periods presented, as the effect of the potential common stock equivalents is anti-dilutive due to the Company’s net loss position for all periods presented. Anti-dilutive securities consisted of the following at September 30:

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made from the fiscal 2016 amounts to conform to the fiscal 2017 presentation. These reclassifications did not have any effect on our net loss or stockholders’ equity.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-12, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718); Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period”. The amendments in ASU 2014-12 apply to all reporting entities that grant their employees share-based payments in which the terms of the award provide that a performance target that affects vesting could be achieved after the requisite service period. The amendments require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition that affects the vesting of the award. The Company adopted ASU 2014-12 effective July 1, 2016. The Company applies the amendments in ASU 2014-12 prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date. Adoption of the new update to ASU 2014-12 did not have any impact on the financial statements of the Company.  

3.     Commitments and Contingencies

Financial Covenants

Effective September 30, 2015, the Company entered into a Fifth Amended and Restated Technology License and Escrow Agreement which modified the financial covenant that the Company must meet in order to avoid an event of default: cash balance and short-term investments net of debt or borrowed funds that are payable within one year of not less than $2,000 must be maintained. The Company is in compliance with this financial covenant as of September 30, 2016.

Warranty

The Company offers a warranty on all of its non-disposable products of one to two years. The Company warrants disposable products through their expiration date. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liabilities and adjusts the amounts as necessary.

The warranty liability is included in other current liabilities in the unaudited balance sheets. The change in the warranty liability for the three months ended September 30, 2016 is summarized in the following table:

Employee Agreements and Company Policy

As of September 30, 2016, the Company’s key executives have certain rights upon termination under employment agreements or current company policy. The agreements and company policy provide, among other things, for the payment of twelve to twenty-four months of severance compensation for termination under certain circumstances. With respect to these agreements and policy at September 30, 2016, potential severance, including incentive compensation amounted to $1,911.

4.     Convertible Debentures

In February 2016 in exchange for aggregate proceeds of $15 million, the Company sold and issued to Boyalife Investment Inc. and Boyalife (Hong Kong) Limited (i) 735,294 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $3.40 per share (the “Stock Price”) for gross proceeds of $2.5 million, (ii) Secured Convertible Debentures for $12.5 million (the “Debentures”) convertible into 3,676,471 shares of common stock and (iii) warrants to purchase 3,529,412 additional shares of common stock at an exercise price of $8.00 per share for a period of five years. The amount of warrants was based on 80% coverage of the shares issued or to be issued for the equity transaction in (i) and the debt transaction in (ii) above. The warrants were exercisable on August 13, 2016 and are outstanding at September 30, 2016.

On August 22, 2016, the Company notified Boyalife Investment Inc., that the Company elected to convert all outstanding principal and interest accrued and otherwise payable under the Debentures, which included the conversion of $12,500 of principal and $8,250 of interest up to and including the maturity date of the Debentures. Upon conversion, 6,102,941 shares of common stock were issued and the Debentures and all security interest and liens were terminated. The common shares of 2,426,470 that were issued for payment of the interest, had a fair market value of $11,404 on August 22, 2016. Accordingly, an additional $3,154 of interest expense was recorded on the date of conversion.

At the time of the conversion, the remaining debt discount of $9,538 and debt issue costs of $155 were fully amortized.

5.     Derivative Obligations

Series A Warrants

Series A warrants to purchase 404,412 common shares were issued and vested during the year ended June 30, 2016. At the time of issuance, the Company determined that as such warrants can be settled for cash at the holders’ option in a future fundamental transaction which constituted a derivative liability. The Company has estimated the fair value of the derivative liability, using a Binomial Lattice Valuation Model and the following assumptions:

Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. Contractual term is based on remaining term of the respective warrants. The discount rate represents the yield on U.S. Treasury bonds with a maturity equal to the contractual term.

The Company recorded a loss of $326 and a gain of $1,426 during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, representing the net change in the fair value of the derivative liability, which is presented as fair value change of derivative instruments, in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

The following table represents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016:

The following table reflects the change in fair value of the Company’s derivative liabilities for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016:

6.     Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock

On August 3, 2016, the Company sold 600,000 shares of common stock at a price of $4.10 per share. The net proceeds to the Company from the sale and issuance of the shares, after deducting the offering expenses borne by the Company of $369, were $2,091. 

In July 2016, the compensation committee of the board of directors granted 118,288 shares of fully vested common stock to employees in partial payment of their earned amounts under the Company’s 2016 short term incentive plan. The election was made by some of the employees to satisfy the applicable federal income tax withholding obligation by a net share settlement, pursuant to which the Company withheld 46,879 shares and used the deemed proceeds from those shares to pay the income tax withholding. The net share settlement is deemed to be a repurchase by the Company of its common stock.

Stock Based Compensation

The Company recorded stock-based compensation of $298 and $343 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The following is a summary of option activity for the Company’s stock option plans:

On July 7, 2016, the compensation committee of the board of directors granted 156,100 options to various employees. The options have an exercise price of $2.86, the closing price on the date of grant, they vest ratably every six months over a three year period and have a seven year life. As the options were granted out of the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (“2016 Plan”), they will not be exercisable until the 2016 Plan is approved by the stockholders, which approval must be received by July 7, 2017.

The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted price of the Company’s common stock. There were no options exercised during the three months ended September 30, 2016.

The fair value of the Company’s stock options granted for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was estimated using the following weighted-average assumptions:

Common Stock Restricted Units

The following is a summary of restricted stock activity during the three months ended September 30, 2016:

On July 26, 2016, the compensation committee of the board of directors granted 98,417 shares of restricted stock to eight employees. The shares will fully vest on July 1, 2017 provided that the individual is employed by the Company as of such date. If the employee is terminated without cause prior to July 1, 2017 the shares vest immediately.

Warrants

A summary of warrant activity for the three months ended September 30, 2016 follows:

At September 30, 2016, the total intrinsic value of warrants outstanding and exercisable was $0.

7.     Subsequent Event

On November 3, 2016, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer was replaced. In accordance with his employment agreement, he is due approximately $1.5 million in cash compensation plus the acceleration of vesting of his stock options and restricted stock. The Company expects to record this severance expense in the second quarter of fiscal 2017.