Exhibit 99.2

ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(In millions, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

1

ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In millions)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

2

ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In millions, except par value and share amounts)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

3

ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In millions)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

4

ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Principles of Consolidation: The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of St. Jude Medical, Inc. (St. Jude Medical or the Company) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. generally accepted accounting principles) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, these statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at January 2, 2016 was derived from audited annual financial statements, but does not contain all of the footnote disclosures from the annual financial statements. Operating results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. Preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and footnotes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in its Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 7, 2016 for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016.

The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, and other entities for which St. Jude Medical has a controlling financial interest.

Effective January 1, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors appointed a new President and Chief Executive Officer whom the Company has determined to be its Chief Operating Decision Maker. During the first quarter of 2016, the Company changed its sales reporting to closely align with how it manages the business in five key areas: Traditional Cardiac Rhythm Management, Heart Failure, Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiovascular and Neuromodulation. The Company continues to operate as a single operating segment.

Reclassifications: Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

Fiscal Year: We utilize a 52/53-week fiscal year ending on the Saturday nearest December 31st. Each of the three-and nine month periods ended October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015 included 13 weeks and 39 weeks, respectively.

New Accounting Pronouncements: The following table provides a description of recent accounting pronouncements adopted and those standards not yet adopted with potential for a material impact on the Company’s financial statements or disclosures.

5

6

7

NOTE 2 — DEBT

The carrying value of the Company’s debt, including debt issuance costs, discounts or premiums consisted of the following (in millions):

Contractual maturities of the Company’s debt for the next five fiscal years and thereafter, excluding any debt issuance costs, discounts or premiums, as of October 1, 2016 were as follows (in millions):

During the first nine months of 2016, the Company repaid its $500 million principal amount of 5-year, 2.500% unsecured senior notes due 2016, made net commercial paper payments of $408 million and drew the remaining $500 million of its 5-year, $2.6 billion unsecured term loan due 2020 (Term Loan Due 2020) to refinance existing indebtedness and for general corporate purposes. The Company also made quarterly principal payments totaling $92 million for the nine months ended October 1, 2016 and prepaid an additional $167 million on its Term Loan Due 2020. Additionally, during the nine months ended October 1, 2016, the Company’s yen-denominated credit facility that expired in March 2016 for 3.25 billion Japanese Yen (the equivalent of $32 million as of October 1, 2016) was automatically extended for a one-year period bearing interest at Yen LIBOR plus 0.250%, and the Company’s yen-denominated credit facility that expired in June 2016 for 3.25 billion Japanese Yen (the equivalent of $32 million as of October 1, 2016) was automatically extended for a one-year period bearing interest at Yen LIBOR plus 0.270%.

8

NOTE 3 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Securities and Other Shareholder Litigation

December 2012 Securities Litigation: On December 7, 2012, a putative securities class action lawsuit was filed in federal district court in Minnesota against the Company and an officer (collectively, the defendants) for alleged violations of the federal securities laws, on behalf of all purchasers of the publicly traded securities of the defendants between October 17, 2012 and November 20, 2012. The complaint, which sought unspecified damages and other relief as well as attorneys’ fees, challenges the Company’s disclosures concerning its high voltage cardiac rhythm lead products during the purported class period. On December 10, 2012, a second putative securities class action lawsuit was filed in federal district court in Minnesota against the Company and certain officers for alleged violations of the federal securities laws, on behalf of all purchasers of the publicly traded securities of the Company between October 19, 2011 and November 20, 2012. The second complaint alleged similar claims and sought similar relief. In March 2013, the Court consolidated the two cases and appointed a lead counsel and lead plaintiff. A consolidated amended complaint was served and filed in June 2013, alleging false or misleading representations made during the class period extending from February 5, 2010 through November 7, 2012. In September 2013, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint. On March 10, 2014, the Court ruled on the motion to dismiss, denying the motion in part and granting the motion in part. On October 7, 2014, the lead plaintiff filed a second amended complaint. Like the original consolidated amended complaint, the plaintiffs did not assert any specific amount of compensation in the second amended complaint. The Court granted class certification on December 22, 2015. On May 24, 2016, the parties agreed to resolve the case, pending notification to class members and subject to court approval. Under the settlement, the Company agreed to make a payment of $39.25 million to resolve all of the class claims and recorded a charge of that amount during the second quarter of 2016. On July 13, 2016, the Court issued an order preliminarily approving the settlement. Concurrent with the recording of the loss, the Company also recognized probable insurance recoveries of $39.25 million. The hearing on final settlement approval is scheduled for November 9, 2016.

Abbott Merger Lawsuits: On May 2, 2016, a shareholder of the Company filed a purported class action lawsuit in Ramsey County, Minnesota, captioned Silverman v. St. Jude Medical, Inc., et al., 62-CV-16-2872 alleging that the Company’s directors breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the proposed merger contemplated by the Company and Abbott Laboratories (Abbott) (the Proposed Transaction). On May 26, 2016, a second action entitled Larkin v. Starks, et al., 62-CV-16-3367, was filed in the same court alleging substantially similar claims. On July 5, 2016, plaintiffs in the two actions jointly filed an Amended Shareholder class and Derivative Action Complaint (the Amended Complaint). Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint asserts that the Company’s directors breached their fiduciary duties by conducting a flawed sale process, failing to maximize shareholder value, and publishing false or misleading disclosure materials relating to the Proposed Transaction, and that the Abbott defendants aided and abetted those breaches. The Amended Complaint asserts direct and/or derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duty, corporate waste and abuse of control under Minnesota Statute § 302A.467. Plaintiffs seek, among other things, to enjoin the Proposed Transaction and an order directing defendants to account to plaintiffs for all damages allegedly suffered by the putative class and damages allegedly incurred by the Company in connection with the Proposed Transaction. On August 3, 2016, a third action entitled Gross v. Starks, et al., 62-CV-16-4581, was filed in Ramsey County, Minnesota, containing allegations similar to those in the Silverman Amended Complaint. This action was consolidated with the two previously filed actions. On June 30, 2016, a shareholder of the Company filed a purported class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, captioned Rosenfeld v. St. Jude Medical, Inc., et al., 16-cv-02275-WMW-FLN, alleging that the Company and its directors violated Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, SEC Rule 14a-9, and Minnesota Statute §§ 80A.68 and 80A.76, and that the Company’s directors violated Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act, by filing a Form S-4 with the SEC that contained false or misleading statements regarding the Proposed Transaction. Plaintiff seeks, among other things, to enjoin the Proposed Transaction or, if consummated, an order rescinding it or awarding actual and punitive damages to Plaintiff and the putative class.

The Company and its directors intend to vigorously defend against the allegations in these actions involving the Proposed Transaction. The Company believes that a material loss is remote. Refer to Note 11 for a discussion of the Proposed Transaction.

9

Regulatory Matters

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspected the Company’s manufacturing facility in Atlanta, Georgia, where the Company manufactures its CardioMEMS™ HF system, at various times between June 8 to June 26, 2015. On July 6, 2015, the FDA issued a Form 483 identifying certain observed non-conformity with current Good Manufacturing Practice at the facility. Following the receipt of the Form 483, the Company provided written responses to the FDA detailing proposed corrective actions and immediately initiated efforts to address the FDA’s observations of non-conformity. The Company subsequently received a warning letter dated September 30, 2015 from the FDA relating to these non-conformities. Since the completion of the FDA inspection, the Company has provided and will continue to provide the FDA with regular updates. The Company has fully-integrated this former CardioMEMS standalone facility into St. Jude Medical’s quality systems. During July 2016, the FDA conducted a follow-up inspection at the Atlanta facility. On July 28, 2016, the FDA issued a Form 483 identifying additional observed non-conformities with current Good Manufacturing Practice at the facility. The Company has worked to remediate these observations. There has been no inspection subsequent to the issuance of the Form 482 and no other further action to date by the FDA. The warning letter is specific to the Atlanta facility and does not impact any of the Company’s other manufacturing facilities. The warning letter does not identify any specific concerns regarding the performance of, or indicate the need for any field or other action regarding, the CardioMEMS™HF system product or any other St. Jude Medical product. The Company will continue manufacturing and shipping product from the Atlanta facility, and customer orders are not expected to be impacted while the Company works to resolve the FDA’s concerns. The Company takes these matters seriously, will respond timely and fully to the FDA’s requests, and believes that the FDA’s concerns will be resolved without a material impact on the Company’s financial results.

Intellectual Property Matters

On October 26, 2016, the Regents of the University of California filed a patent infringement action against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging that two U.S. patents owned by the Regents of the University of California are infringed by certain of our catheters and other devices used to treat atrial fibrillation. The Company has not recorded an expense related to any potential damages in connection with this matter because any potential loss is not probable or reasonably estimable. Because, based on the Company’s historical experience, the amount ultimately paid, if any, often does not bear any relationship to the amount claimed, the Company cannot reasonably estimate a loss or range of loss, if any, that may result from this matter.

Product Warranties

The Company offers a warranty on various products, the most significant of which relate to tachycardia implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and pacemaker systems. The Company estimates the costs it expects to incur under its warranties and records a liability for such costs at the time the product is sold. Factors that affect the Company’s warranty liability include the number of units sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims and cost per claim. The Company regularly assesses the adequacy of its warranty liabilities and adjusts the amounts as necessary.

Changes in the Company’s product warranty liability during the three and nine months ended October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015 were as follows (in millions):

10

NOTE 4 — SPECIAL CHARGES

The Company recognizes certain transactions and events as special charges in its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. These charges (such as restructuring charges, impairment charges, certain legal settlements or product field action costs and litigation costs) result from facts and circumstances that vary in frequency and impact on the Company’s results of operations.

2016 Initiatives

During the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company initiated restructuring activities to drive cross-functional synergies (the 2016 Initiatives). The 2016 Initiatives include enhancing focus on programs that will strengthen its strategic objectives, driving productivity enhancements and incurring costs to fully integrate its recent acquisitions. During 2015, the Company incurred charges primarily related to severance and other termination benefits.

During the first quarter of 2016, the Company incurred additional charges related to severance and other termination benefits, contract termination costs and fixed asset write-offs, primarily associated with the closure of Thoratec Corporation (Thoratec) facilities as the Company continues to integrate the acquisition. During the second quarter of 2016, the Company incurred additional charges related to severance and other termination benefits, distributor contract terminations and other Thoratec-related contract terminations. During the third quarter of 2016, the Company incurred additional charges related to contract terminations and other exit costs, severance and other termination benefits and fixed asset write-offs, primarily associated with the continued closure of its Thoratec facilities and a U.S. based research facility. The Company currently expects to incur approximately $5 million to $10 million during the remainder of 2016 to complete the plan, but may incur additional charges in future periods.

A summary of the activity related to the 2016 Initiatives accrual is as follows (in millions):

11

Manufacturing and Supply Chain Optimization Plan

During 2014, the Company initiated the Manufacturing and Supply Chain Optimization Plan to leverage economies of scale, streamline distribution methods, drive process improvements through global synergies, balance plant utilization levels, centralize certain vendor relationships and reduce overall costs. During 2015, the Company incurred charges primarily related to severance and other termination benefits, contract termination costs and fixed asset write-offs. These costs included charges associated with the elimination of certain operational, quality and hardware development activities at a research and development facility, continued exit costs related to a facility closure in the United States and software development assets no longer expected to be utilized.

During the first, second and third quarters of 2016, the Company incurred additional charges primarily related to continued exit costs associated with a facility closure in the United States. Material charges are not expected in future periods as the Manufacturing and Supply Chain Optimization Plan is now complete.

A summary of the activity related to the Manufacturing and Supply Chain Optimization Plan accrual is as follows (in millions):

2012 Business Realignment Plan

During 2012, the Company realigned its product divisions into two new operating divisions: the Implantable Electronic Systems Division (combining its legacy Cardiac Rhythm Management and Neuromodulation product divisions) and the Cardiovascular and Ablation Technologies Division (combining its legacy Cardiovascular and Atrial Fibrillation product divisions). In addition, the Company centralized certain support functions, including information technology, human resources, legal, business development and certain marketing functions. The organizational changes have been part of a comprehensive plan to accelerate the Company’s growth, reduce costs, leverage economies of scale and increase investment in product development. During 2014, the Company announced additional organizational changes including the combination of its Implantable Electronic Systems Division and Cardiovascular and Ablation Technologies Division, resulting in an integrated research and development (R&D) organization and a consolidation of manufacturing and supply chain operations worldwide.

During 2015, the Company incurred additional charges primarily related to severance and other termination benefits and other restructuring costs, including contract termination costs, asset relocation expenses and other exit costs predominately associated with the facility closure in Europe.

During the first quarter of 2016, the Company reassessed the remaining accrual balance and determined that some of the previously recorded accrual balances were no longer necessary. Additionally, during the third quarter of 2016, the Company revised estimates

12

for employee termination costs, recognizing a special benefit. Additionally, the Company recognized a special benefit for salvaged inventory components during the third quarter of 2016. No additional charges are expected in future periods as the 2012 Business Realignment Plan is complete.

A summary of the activity related to the 2012 Business Realignment Plan accrual is as follows (in millions):

Other Special Charges

Intangible asset impairment charges: During the third quarter of 2015, the Company recognized a $2 million impairment charge associated with a customer relationship intangible asset (see Note 8).

Legal settlements: During the third quarter of 2016, the Company recognized charges of $3 million primarily to evaluate allegations made by third parties about the safety and security of the Company’s implantable cardiac rhythm management devices, initiate litigation against certain third parties related to those allegations and evaluate claims in a putative class action lawsuit asserting claims related to the safety and security of those devices. The putative class action has not yet been served. The Company also recognized net legal settlement gains of $19 million associated with four separate legal cases during the first nine months of 2016. Additionally, the Company recognized a legal settlement loss related to the December 2012 Securities Litigation and concurrently recognized insurance recoveries in the same amount during the first nine months of 2016 (see Note 3).

During the third quarter of 2015, the Company recognized a $1 million charge related to an unfavorable judgment for a product liability claim. During the first nine months of 2015, this charge was fully offset by $10 million in insurance recoveries recognized by the Company as a special benefit in connection with the March 2010 Securities Class Action Litigation.

Product field action costs and litigation costs: During the first nine months of 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized approximately $6 million and $14 million, respectively, of litigation charges for expected future probable and estimable legal costs associated with outstanding legal matters related to the Company’s product field actions. Charges in excess of the amounts accrued are reasonably possible and depend on a number of factors, such as the type of claims received and the cost to defend.

13

During the third quarter and first nine months of 2016, the Company recognized $25 million and $28 million, respectively, of product field action costs. The Company initiated an advisory letter to physicians for patients implanted with certain tachycardia cardiac rhythm management devices that were identified as having a potential premature battery depletion issue that could, on rare occasions, result in necessary treatment not being provided. In connection with this advisory, the Company recognized charges of $26 million to cost of sales special charges related to product field action costs, primarily for estimated scrapped inventory and costs for providing remote monitoring to patients under the advisory during the third quarter of 2016. Charges in excess of the accrual are reasonably possible and depend on a number of factors, such as the number of physicians requesting remote monitoring. During the first nine months of 2016, the Company also initiated an advisory letter to physicians for patients implanted with certain ICD devices that were identified as having a potential therapy anomaly resulting in a lack of necessary treatment. As a result, the Company recognized charges of $5 million to cost of sales special charges primarily for estimated scrapped inventory and warranty costs during the first nine months of 2016. Partially offsetting these charges, the Company recognized a $1 million benefit and a $3 million benefit during the third quarter and first nine months of 2016, respectively, to cost of sales special charges for salvaged inventory components related to an advisory action initiated in 2014.

During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company initiated an advisory letter to physicians participating in an investigational device exemption study for patients implanted with certain leadless bradycardia cardiac rhythm management devices that were identified as having a potential premature battery depletion issue that could, on rare occasions, result in necessary treatment not being provided. As a result, the Company expects to recognize charges relating to scrapped inventory and intangible assets, which will be partially offset by reductions in contingent consideration liabilities.

During the first nine months of 2015, the Company recognized a $7 million benefit to cost of sales special charges, of which $5 million related to salvaged inventory components associated with the same advisory action initiated in 2014 and $2 million related to lower than expected direct recall costs associated with a 2012 voluntary product field action related to certain neuromodulation implantable pulse generator charging systems.

Other restructuring-related charges: The Company also recognized other restructuring-related charges of $3 million during the first nine months of 2016.

NOTE 5 — NET EARNINGS PER SHARE

The table below sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net earnings per share attributable to St. Jude Medical, Inc. (in millions, except per share amounts):

14

NOTE 6 — ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) AND SUPPLEMENTAL EQUITY INFORMATION

The tables below present the changes in each component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, including other comprehensive income and reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net earnings for the three and nine months ended October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015, respectively (in millions):