Attached files

file filename
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 - Pacific Oak Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc.kbssoriiq32016exhibit321.htm
EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 - Pacific Oak Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc.kbssoriiq32016exhibit322.htm
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 - Pacific Oak Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc.kbssoriiq32016exhibit312.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 - Pacific Oak Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc.kbssoriiq32016exhibit311.htm
EX-10.3 - PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (NOHO) - Pacific Oak Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc.kbssoriiq32016exhibit103.htm
EX-10.2 - LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT (NOHO) - Pacific Oak Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc.kbssoriiq32016exhibit102.htm
EX-10.1 - ADVISORY AGREEMENT - Pacific Oak Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc.kbssoriiq32016exhibit101.htm


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
______________________________________________________
 
FORM 10-Q
______________________________________________________
(Mark One)
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016
OR
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from              to             
Commission file number 000-55424
______________________________________________________
 
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
______________________________________________________
Maryland
 
46-2822978
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
800 Newport Center Drive, Suite 700
Newport Beach, California
 
92660
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 
(Zip Code)
(949) 417-6500
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x  No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer
 
¨
 
Accelerated Filer
 
¨
Non-Accelerated Filer
 
¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company
 
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    
Yes  ¨  No  x
As of November 8, 2016, there were 13,666,035 and 4,837,882 outstanding shares of Class A and Class T common stock of KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc., respectively.



KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc.
FORM 10-Q
September 30, 2016
INDEX 
PART I.
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
Item 3.
 
Item 4.
PART II.
 
Item 1.
 
Item 1A.
 
Item 2.
 
Item 3.
 
Item 4.
 
Item 5.
 
Item 6.


1

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements


KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
 
 
September 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
(unaudited)
 
 
Assets
 
 
 
 
Real estate, net
 
$
171,299

 
$
109,973

Real estate loan receivable, net
 
3,424

 
3,372

Total real estate and real estate-related investments, net
 
174,723

 
113,345

Cash and cash equivalents
 
66,502

 
24,768

Restricted cash
 
2,432

 
598

Investment in unconsolidated entity
 
2,587

 

Rents and other receivables
 
2,220

 
311

Above-market leases, net
 
22

 
37

Prepaid expenses and other assets
 
4,477

 
670

Total assets
 
$
252,963

 
$
139,729

Liabilities and equity
 
 
 
 
Notes payable, net
 
$
106,238

 
$
60,836

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
 
4,852

 
3,885

Due to affiliates
 
1,921

 
2,356

Below-market leases, net
 
1,145

 

Distributions payable
 
1,078

 

Other liabilities
 
3,031

 
818

Total liabilities
 
118,265

 
67,895

Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
 


 


Redeemable common stock
 
1,716

 
1,092

Equity
 
 
 
 
     KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc. stockholders’ equity
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding
 

 

Class A common stock, $.01 par value per share; 500,000,000 shares authorized, 13,102,528 and 9,619,143 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively
 
131

 
96

Class T common stock, $.01 par value per share; 500,000,000 shares authorized, 3,941,104 and none issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively
 
39

 

Additional paid-in capital
 
147,236

 
79,622

Cumulative distributions and net losses
 
(19,429
)
 
(13,266
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income
 
40

 

Total KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc. stockholders’ equity
 
128,017

 
66,452

Noncontrolling interests
 
4,965

 
4,290

Total equity
 
132,982

 
70,742

Total liabilities and equity
 
$
252,963

 
$
139,729

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.
 

2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)

KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hotel revenues
 
$
8,599

 
$
7,222

 
$
20,563

 
$
14,119

Office revenues
 
1,892

 

 
3,289

 

Interest income from real estate loan receivable
 
101

 
99

 
298

 
291

Total revenues
 
10,592

 
7,321

 
24,150

 
14,410

Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hotel expenses
 
5,157

 
3,689

 
13,466

 
9,105

Office expenses
 
521

 

 
860

 

Asset management fees to affiliate
 
359


89


908


257

Real estate acquisition fees to affiliate
 




1,341



Real estate acquisition fees and expenses
 




123



General and administrative expenses
 
694

 
616

 
2,106

 
1,560

Depreciation and amortization
 
2,314

 
185

 
5,299

 
550

Interest expense
 
931

 
290

 
2,379

 
869

Total expenses
 
9,976

 
4,869

 
26,482

 
12,341

Other income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other interest income
 
75

 
18

 
132

 
31

Equity in income of unconsolidated entity
 
58

 

 
58

 

Total other income
 
133

 
18

 
190

 
31

Net income (loss)
 
749


2,470


(2,142
)

2,100

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
(148
)

(300
)

(160
)

(341
)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
 
$
601

 
$
2,170

 
$
(2,302
)
 
$
1,759

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A Common Stock:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
 
$
493

 
$
2,145

 
$
(2,235
)
 
$
1,736

Net income (loss) per common share, basic and diluted
 
$
0.04

 
$
0.30

 
$
(0.19
)
 
$
0.28

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
 
12,915,552

 
7,165,984

 
12,053,850

 
6,241,190

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class T Common Stock:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
 
$
108

 
$
25

 
$
(67
)
 
$
23

Net income (loss) per common share, basic and diluted
 
$
0.05

 
$
0.30

 
$
(0.07
)
 
$
0.28

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
 
2,363,520

 
82,126

 
934,651

 
82,126

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)

KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Net income (loss)
 
$
749

 
$
2,470

 
$
(2,142
)
 
$
2,100

Other comprehensive income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation gain
 
27

 

 
40

 

Total other comprehensive income
 
27

 

 
40

 

Total comprehensive income (loss)
 
776

 
2,470

 
(2,102
)
 
2,100

Total comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
(148
)
 
(300
)
 
(160
)
 
(341
)
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
 
$
628

 
$
2,170

 
$
(2,262
)
 
$
1,759

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.


4

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)

KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 and the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 (unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-in Capital
 
Cumulative Distributions and
Net Losses
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
 
Total Stockholders’ Equity
 
Noncontrolling Interests
 
Total Equity
 
Class A
 
Class T
 
 
Shares
 
Amounts
 
Shares
 
Amounts
 
Balance, December 31, 2014
3,893,812

 
$
39

 

 
$

 
$
31,489

 
$
(2,527
)
 
$

 
$
29,001

 
$
1,657

 
$
30,658

Issuance of common stock
4,959,727

 
49

 

 

 
48,924

 

 

 
48,973

 

 
48,973

Transfers to redeemable common stock

 

 

 

 
(1,092
)
 

 

 
(1,092
)
 

 
(1,092
)
Stock dividends issued
765,604

 
8

 

 

 
7,648

 
(7,656
)
 

 

 

 

Distributions declared

 

 

 

 

 
(1,027
)
 

 
(1,027
)
 

 
(1,027
)
Commissions on stock sales and related dealer manager fees to affiliate

 

 

 

 
(4,055
)
 

 

 
(4,055
)
 

 
(4,055
)
Other offering costs

 

 

 

 
(3,292
)
 

 

 
(3,292
)
 

 
(3,292
)
Net (loss) income

 

 

 

 

 
(2,056
)
 

 
(2,056
)
 
107

 
(1,949
)
Noncontrolling interests contributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
2,532

 
2,532

Distribution to noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(6
)
 
(6
)
Balance, December 31, 2015
9,619,143

 
$
96

 

 
$

 
$
79,622

 
$
(13,266
)
 
$

 
$
66,452

 
$
4,290

 
$
70,742

Net (loss) income

 

 

 

 

 
(2,302
)
 

 
(2,302
)
 
160

 
(2,142
)
Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 
40

 
40

 

 
40

Issuance of common stock
3,328,739

 
33

 
3,931,258

 
39

 
70,327

 

 

 
70,399

 

 
70,399

Stock dividends issued
159,020

 
2

 
9,846

 

 
1,683

 
(1,685
)
 

 

 

 

Redemptions of common stock
(4,374
)
 

 

 

 
(40
)
 

 

 
(40
)
 

 
(40
)
Transfers to redeemable common stock

 

 

 

 
(624
)
 

 

 
(624
)
 

 
(624
)
Distributions declared

 

 

 

 

 
(2,176
)
 

 
(2,176
)
 

 
(2,176
)
Commissions on stock sales, related dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees to affiliate

 

 

 

 
(5,777
)
 

 

 
(5,777
)
 

 
(5,777
)
Reduction of other offering costs

 

 

 

 
2,045

 

 

 
2,045

 

 
2,045

Noncontrolling interests contributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
515

 
515

Balance, September 30, 2016
13,102,528

 
$
131

 
3,941,104

 
$
39

 
$
147,236

 
$
(19,429
)
 
$
40

 
$
128,017

 
$
4,965

 
$
132,982

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.


5

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)

KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015
(unaudited)
 
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2016
 
2015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
 
 
 
 
Net (loss) income
 
$
(2,142
)
 
$
2,100

Adjustment to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities
 
 
 
 
Equity in income of unconsolidated entity
 
(58
)
 

Depreciation and amortization
 
5,299

 
550

Noncash interest income on real estate-related investment
 
(52
)
 
(45
)
Deferred rents
 
(172
)
 

Amortization of above-market leases
 
(285
)
 

Amortization of deferred financing costs
 
384

 
173

Unrealized loss on derivative instrument
 
43

 
68

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
Restricted cash for operational expenditures
 
(1,603
)
 
(1,118
)
Rents and other receivables
 
(1,737
)
 
(280
)
Prepaid expenses and other assets
 
(845
)
 
18

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
 
1,594

 
1,596

Due to affiliates
 
(10
)
 
(697
)
Other liabilities
 
2,213

 
231

Net cash provided by operating activities
 
2,629

 
2,596

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
 
 
 
 
Acquisition of real estate
 
(51,341
)
 

Improvements to real estate
 
(14,298
)
 
(2,547
)
Investment in unconsolidated entity
 
(2,486
)
 

Escrow deposits for future real estate purchases
 
(3,000
)
 

Restricted cash for capital expenditures
 
(231
)
 
(118
)
Net cash used in investing activities
 
(71,356
)
 
(2,665
)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from notes payable
 
45,500

 

Payments of deferred financing costs
 
(492
)
 
(14
)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
 
69,735

 
26,681

Payments to redeem common stock
 
(40
)
 

Distributions paid
 
(434
)
 

Payments of commissions on stock sales, related dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees
 
(4,303
)
 
(2,109
)
Payments of other offering costs
 
(20
)
 
(23
)
Noncontrolling interests contributions
 
515

 

Distribution to noncontrolling interest
 

 
(6
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
 
110,461

 
24,529

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
 
41,734

 
24,460

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
 
24,768

 
13,257

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
 
$
66,502

 
$
37,717

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
 
 
 
 
Interest paid, net of capitalized interest of $126 and $0 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively
 
$
1,788

 
$
562

Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:
 
 
 
 
Distributions paid to common stockholders through common stock issuances pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan
 
$
664

 
$

Increase in accrued improvements to real estate
 
$

 
$
447

Increase in acquisition fees due to affiliate
 
$
166

 
$

Increase in other offering costs due to affiliates
 
$
157

 
$
1,870

Reversal of accrued organization and offering expenses due to affiliates
 
$
(2,222
)
 
$

Increase in stockholder servicing fees due to affiliate
 
$
1,474

 
$

Stock dividends issued
 
$
1,685

 
$
1,665

Increase in distributions payable
 
$
1,078

 
$

Foreign currency translation gain on investment in unconsolidated entity
 
$
40

 
$

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.

6

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



1.
ORGANIZATION
KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc. (the “Company”) was formed on February 6, 2013 as a Maryland corporation that elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2014 and intends to continue to operate in such a manner. The Company’s business is conducted through KBS Strategic Opportunity Limited Partnership II (the “Operating Partnership”), a Delaware limited partnership formed on February 7, 2013. The Company is the sole general partner of, and owns a 0.1% partnership interest in, the Operating Partnership. KBS Strategic Opportunity Holdings II LLC (“REIT Holdings”), a Delaware limited liability company formed on February 7, 2013, owns the remaining 99.9% partnership interest in the Operating Partnership and is the sole limited partner. The Company is the sole member and manager of REIT Holdings. The Company has three wholly owned taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”), two of which lease the Company’s hotel properties and in turn contract with independent hotel management companies that manage the day-to-day operations of the Company’s hotels; the third consolidates the Company’s wholly owned TRSs.  The Company’s TRSs are subject to federal and state income tax at regular corporate tax rates.
Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, the business of the Company has been externally managed by KBS Capital Advisors LLC (the “Advisor”), an affiliate of the Company, since July 2013 pursuant to an advisory agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”). The Advisor conducts the Company’s operations and manages its portfolio of real estate loans, opportunistic real estate and other real estate-related investments. The Advisor has entered into a sub-advisory agreement with STAM, a real estate operating company to provide real estate acquisition and portfolio management services to the Advisor in connection with any investments the Company may make in value-added real estate, distressed debt, and real estate-related investments in Europe. On July 3, 2013, the Company issued 21,739 shares of its common stock to the Advisor at a purchase price of $9.20 per share.
The Company expects to invest in and manage a diverse portfolio of opportunistic real estate, real estate-related loans, real estate-related debt securities and other real estate-related investments located in the United States and Europe. Such investments may include the acquisition of distressed debt, the origination and acquisition of mortgage, mezzanine, bridge and other real estate-related loans, investment in opportunistic real estate and investments in real estate-related debt securities such as residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations. The Company may also invest in entities that make similar investments. As of September 30, 2016, the Company owned two hotel properties, two office properties, one first mortgage loan and an investment in an unconsolidated entity.
From July 3, 2013 to August 11, 2014, the Company conducted a private placement offering (the “Private Offering”) exempt from registration under Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”). The Company sold 3,619,851 shares of common stock for gross offering proceeds of $32.2 million in the Private Offering.
On November 14, 2013, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to offer a maximum of 180,000,000 shares of common stock for sale to the public (the “Public Offering”), of which 100,000,000 shares were registered in a primary offering and 80,000,000 shares were registered to be sold under the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan. The SEC declared the Company’s registration statement effective on August 12, 2014. On February 11, 2016, the Company filed an amended registration statement on Form S-11 with the SEC to offer a second class of common stock designated as Class T shares and to designate its initially offered and outstanding common stock as Class A shares. Pursuant to the amended registration statement, the Company is offering to sell any combination of Class A and Class T shares in the Public Offering but in no event may the Company sell more than 180,000,000 of shares of its common stock pursuant to the Public Offering. The Company commenced offering Class T shares of our common stock for sale to the public on February 17, 2016.  KBS Capital Markets Group LLC (the “Dealer Manager”), an affiliate of the Advisor, serves as the dealer manager of the Public Offering pursuant to a dealer manager agreement originally dated August 12, 2014 and amended and restated February 17, 2016 (the “Dealer Manager Agreement”). Previously the Dealer Manager served as dealer manager for the Private Offering. The Dealer Manager is responsible for marketing the Company’s shares.

7

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



On January 7, 2015, the Company broke escrow in the Public Offering and through September 30, 2016, the Company had sold 8,288,466 and 3,931,258 shares of Class A and Class T common stock in the Public Offering, respectively, for aggregate gross offering proceeds of $119.4 million, including 129,281 and 3,058 shares of Class A and Class T common stock sold under its dividend reinvestment plan, respectively, for aggregate gross offering proceeds of $1.3 million. Also as of September 30, 2016, the Company had redeemed 4,374 shares of Class A common stock for $40,000.
On each of April 2, 2014 and July 31, 2014, the Company issued 120,106 shares of Class A common stock to Willowbrook Capital Group LLC, an entity owned and controlled by Keith D. Hall, one of the Company’s directors and the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and Peter McMillan III, also one of the Company’s directors and the Company’s President, for $1.0 million. The Company issued these shares of common stock in a private transaction exempt from the registration requirements of the Act pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Act.
2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
There have been no significant changes to the Company’s accounting policies since it filed its audited financial statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, except for the addition of an accounting policy related to foreign currency translation. For further information about the Company’s accounting policies, refer to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2015 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and condensed notes thereto have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information as contained within the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and the rules and regulations of the SEC, including the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for audited financial statements. In the opinion of management, the financial statements for the unaudited interim periods presented include all adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring nature, necessary for a fair and consistent presentation of the results for such periods. Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, REIT Holdings, the Operating Partnership and their direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries and joint ventures in which the Company has a controlling interest. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.
Selling Commissions, Dealer Manager Fees and Stockholder Servicing Fee
Prior to February 17, 2016, the Company paid the Dealer Manager up to 6.5% of the price per share of Class A common stock sold in the Private Offering and the Public Offering as a selling commission. The Dealer Manager reallowed 100% of commissions earned to participating broker-dealers. No sales commissions were paid on shares sold through the dividend reinvestment plan.  The Company paid the Dealer Manager up to 3.0% of the price per share of Class A common stock sold in the Private Offering and the Public Offering as a dealer manager fee. No dealer manager fee was payable on shares sold under the dividend reinvestment plan. From its dealer manager fee, the Dealer Manager reallowed to any participating broker-dealer up to 1.0% of the price per share of Class A common stock sold in the Private Offering and the Public Offering attributable to that participating broker-dealer as a marketing fee and in special cases the dealer manager could increase the reallowance. A reduced dealer manager fee was payable with respect to certain volume discount sales.  

8

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



On February 17, 2016, the Company and the Dealer Manager entered into an Amended and Restated Dealer Manager Agreement (the “Amended Dealer Manager Agreement”) to provide the terms pursuant to which the Dealer Manager will offer and sell the Company’s Class A and Class T shares of common stock in the Public Offering. Under the Amended Dealer Manager Agreement, the Company pays selling commissions to the Dealer Manager in amounts up to 6.5% of the price per share of Class A common stock sold and up to 3.0% of the price per share of Class T common stock sold. Additionally, the Company pays dealer manager fees to the Dealer Manager in an amount up to 2.0% of the price per share of Class A and Class T common stock sold. The Dealer Manager reallows all selling commissions to participating broker dealers and may generally reallow (from its dealer manager fee) to any participating broker dealer up to 1.0% of the gross proceeds from the primary portion of the Public Offering attributable to that participating broker dealer as a marketing fee; in select cases up to 1.5% of the gross proceeds from the primary portion of the Public Offering may be reallowed. No selling commissions or dealer manager fees are payable on shares of common stock sold under the dividend reinvestment plan.
Also, under the Amended Dealer Manager Agreement, the Dealer Manager receives an annual stockholder servicing fee of 1.0% of the purchase price per share (ignoring any discounts that may be available to certain categories of purchasers) of Class T common stock sold in the primary portion of the Public Offering solely to the extent there is a broker dealer of record with respect to such Class T share that has entered a currently effective selected dealer agreement or servicing agreement that provides for the payment to such broker dealer of the stockholder servicing fee with respect to such Class T share, and such broker dealer of record is in compliance with the applicable terms of such selected dealer agreement or servicing agreement related to such payment. To the extent payable, the stockholder servicing fee accrues daily and is paid monthly in arrears, and the Dealer Manager reallows 100% of the stockholder servicing fee to such broker dealer of record for services provided to Class T stockholders after the initial sale of the Class T share.  In addition, no stockholder servicing fee is paid with respect to Class T shares purchased through the dividend reinvestment plan or issued pursuant to a stock dividend.
The Company records the stockholder servicing fee as a reduction to additional paid-in capital and the related liability in an amount equal to the maximum stockholder servicing fee payable in relation to the Class T share on the date the share is issued. For each share of Class T common stock in the Primary Offering, the maximum stockholder servicing fee equals 4% of the purchase price per share (ignoring any discounts in purchase price that may be available to certain categories of purchasers). The liability will be reduced over time, as the fees are paid to the Dealer Manager, or it will be adjusted if the fees are no longer payable as a result of the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) the date at which aggregate underwriting compensation from all sources equals 10% of the gross proceeds from the Primary Offering in which the Class T share was sold, as calculated by the Company with the assistance of the Dealer Manager after the termination of the Primary Offering in which the Class T share was sold, (ii) a listing of the Company’s common stock on a national securities exchange, (iii) a merger or other extraordinary transaction, and (iv) the date the Class T share associated with the stockholder servicing fee is no longer outstanding such as upon its redemption or the Company’s dissolution.
Foreign Currency Translation
The Company has a participating loan facility funded in Euros which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting and recorded as an investment in unconsolidated entity in the accompanying balance sheet.  The Company’s reporting currency is the U.S. dollar, however the functional currency of the unconsolidated entity is the Euro.  At the end of each reporting period, before determining the Company’s share of its equity investment, the results of operations of the unconsolidated entity is translated into U.S. dollars using the average currency rates of exchange in effect during the period, and the assets and the liabilities of the unconsolidated entity are translated using the currency exchange rate in effect at the end of the period.  The resulting foreign currency translation adjustment is recorded as other comprehensive income (loss) on the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) and consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity.

9

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



Segments
The Company has invested in opportunistic real estate investments and originated a loan secured by a non-stabilized real estate asset. In general, the Company intends to hold its investments in opportunistic real estate and other real estate-related assets for capital appreciation. Traditional performance metrics of opportunistic real estate and other real estate-related assets may not be meaningful as these investments are generally non-stabilized and do not provide a consistent stream of interest income or rental revenue. These investments exhibit similar long-term financial performance and have similar economic characteristics. These investments typically involve a higher degree of risk and do not provide a constant stream of ongoing cash flows. As a result, the Company’s management views opportunistic real estate and other real estate-related assets as similar investments. Substantially all of its revenue and net income (loss) is from opportunistic real estate and other real estate-related assets, and therefore, the Company currently aggregates its operating segments into one reportable business segment.
Per Share Data
Basic net income (loss) per share of common stock is calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding for each class of share outstanding during such period. Diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock equals basic net income (loss) per share of common stock as there were no potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015. For the purpose of determining the weighted average number of shares outstanding, stock dividends issued are adjusted retroactively and treated as if they were issued and outstanding for all periods presented. 
The Company’s board of directors has declared and issued the following stock dividends on shares of the Company’s common stock through the filing date of this report:
Declaration Date
 
Record Date
 
Issue Date
 
Amount Declared per
Share Outstanding
 
Total Shares Issued
March 24, 2015
 
March 25, 2015
 
March 27, 2015
 
0.01 shares
 
44,538
April 7, 2015
 
June 24, 2015
 
June 29, 2015
 
0.01 shares
 
56,219
August 6, 2015
 
September 22, 2015
 
September 29, 2015
 
0.01 shares
 
65,710
November 10, 2015
 
December 16, 2015
 
December 22, 2015
 
0.01 shares
 
85,591
December 10, 2015
 
December 16, 2015
 
December 21, 2015
 
0.06 shares
 
513,546
March 21, 2016
 
March 31, 2016
 
April 1, 2016
 
0.005 shares
 
57,172
March 21, 2016
 
April 30, 2016
 
May 3, 2016
 
0.001667 shares
 
19,781
March 21, 2016
 
May 31, 2016
 
June 1, 2016
 
0.001667 shares
 
20,257
May 10, 2016
 
June 30, 2016
 
July 1, 2016
 
0.001667 shares
 
21,900
May 10, 2016
 
July 31, 2016
 
August 2, 2016
 
0.001667 shares
 
23,719
July 6, 2016
 
August 31, 2016
 
September 1, 2016
 
0.001667 shares
 
26,037
August 11, 2016
 
September 30, 2016
 
October 4, 2016
 
0.001667 shares
 
28,420
August 11, 2016
 
October 31, 2016
 
November 2, 2016
 
0.001667 shares
 
30,341
September 27, 2016
 
September 27, 2016
 
October 6, 2016
 
0.015 shares
 
254,287
For the purpose of calculating the dollar amount of the Class A and Class T stock dividends issued, the Company used the current Class A and Class T primary offering price in the Public Offering.

10

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



Cash distributions declared per share of Class A common stock were $0.098 and $0.154 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. Cash distributions declared per share of Class T common stock were $0.074 and $0.098 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. Cash distributions for Class T Shares are reduced by the applicable daily stockholder servicing fees. Distributions declared per share of Class A common stock assumes each share was issued and outstanding each day during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. Distributions declared per share of Class T common stock assumes each share was issued and outstanding each day during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and from March 2, 2016 through September 30, 2016, respectively. Each day during the period from March 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016 was a record date for distributions. Distributions for this period were calculated based on stockholders of record each day during this period at a rate of (i) $0.00026202 per share per day less (ii) the applicable daily stockholder servicing fees accrued for and allocable to any class of common stock, divided by the  number of shares of common stock of such class outstanding as of the close of business on each respective record date. Each day during the period from April 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016 was a record date for distributions. Distributions for this period were calculated based on stockholders of record each day during this period at a rate of (i) $0.00052404 per share per day less (ii) the applicable daily stockholder servicing fees accrued for and allocable to any class of common stock, divided by the  number of shares of common stock of such class outstanding as of the close of business on each respective record date. On September 27, 2016, the Company’s board of directors declared a one-time cash distribution in the amount of $0.05 per share on the outstanding shares of all classes of common stock to stockholders of record as of the close of business on September 27, 2016. The Company did not declare cash distributions during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.
In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260-10-45, Earnings Per Share, the Company uses the two-class method to calculate earnings per share. Basic earnings per share is calculated based on dividends declared (“distributed earnings”) and the rights of common shares and participating securities in any undistributed earnings, which represents net income remaining after deduction of dividends declared during the period. The undistributed earnings are allocated to all outstanding common shares based on the relative percentage of each class of shares to the total number of outstanding shares. The Company does not have any participating securities outstanding other than Class A Common Stock and Class T Common stock during the periods presented.

11

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



 
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
 
$
601

 
$
2,170

 
$
(2,302
)
 
$
1,759

Less: Class A Common Stock cash distributions declared
 
1,264

 

 
1,921

 

Less: Class T Common Stock cash distributions declared
 
249

 

 
255

 

Undistributed Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders
 
$
(912
)
 
$
2,170

 
$
(4,478
)
 
$
1,759

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A Common Stock:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Undistributed Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders
 
$
(771
)
 
$
2,145

 
$
(4,156
)
 
$
1,736

Class A Common Stock cash distributions declared
 
1,264

 

 
1,921

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Class A common stockholders
 
$
493

 
$
2,145

 
$
(2,235
)
 
$
1,736

Net income (loss) per common share, basic and diluted
 
$
0.04

 
$
0.30

 
$
(0.19
)
 
$
0.28

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
 
12,915,552

 
7,165,984

 
12,053,850

 
6,241,190

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class T Common Stock:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Undistributed Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders
 
$
(141
)
 
$
25

 
$
(322
)
 
$
23

Class T Common Stock cash distributions declared
 
249

 

 
255

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Class T common stockholders
 
$
108

 
$
25

 
$
(67
)
 
$
23

Net income (loss) per common share, basic and diluted
 
$
0.05

 
$
0.30

 
$
(0.07
)
 
$
0.28

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
 
2,363,520

 
82,126

 
934,651

 
82,126

Square Footage, Occupancy and Other Measures
 Any references to square footage, occupancy or annualized base rent are unaudited and outside the scope of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm’s review of the Company’s financial statements in accordance with the standards of the United States Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards Update
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU No. 2014-09”). ASU No. 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize the revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services.  ASU No. 2014-09 supersedes the revenue requirements in Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification.  ASU No. 2014-09 does not apply to lease contracts within the scope of Leases (Topic 840). ASU No. 2014-09 was to be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016, and is to be applied retrospectively, with early application not permitted. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU No. 2015-14”), which defers the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 by one year. Early adoption is permitted but not before the original effective date. The Company is still evaluating the impact of adopting ASU No. 2014-09 on its financial statements.

12

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis (“ASU No. 2015-02”), which amended the existing accounting standards for consolidation under both the variable interest model and the voting model. ASU No. 2015-02 modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities (“VIEs”) or voting interest entities, eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership and affects the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships. ASU No. 2015-02 is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. A reporting entity may apply the amendments in ASU No. 2015-02 using: (a) a modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption; or (b) by applying the amendments retrospectively. On January 1, 2016, the Company adopted ASU No. 2015-02 and re-evaluated its consolidation analysis of its joint ventures, concluding that such adoption did not result in (a) the classification of any entities as VIEs, (b) a consolidation of entities not previously consolidated (c) a deconsolidation of entities previously consolidated.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU No. 2016-01”).  The amendments in ASU No. 2016-01 address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments.  ASU No. 2016-01 primarily affects accounting for equity investments and financial liabilities where the fair value option has been elected.  ASU No. 2016-01 also requires entities to present financial assets and financial liabilities separately, grouped by measurement category and form of financial asset in the balance sheet or in the accompanying notes to the financial statements.  ASU No. 2016-01 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early application is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued.  The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2016-01 to have a significant impact on its financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU No. 2016-02”). The amendments in ASU No. 2016-02 changes the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. ASU No. 2016-02 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of ASU No. 2016-02 as of its issuance is permitted. The new leases standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new leases standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326) (“ASU No. 2016-13”).  ASU No. 2016-13 affects entities holding financial assets and net investments in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income.  The amendments in ASU No. 2016-13 require a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected.  The allowance for credit losses is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset(s) to present the net carrying value at the amount expected to be collected on the financial asset.  ASU No. 2016-13 also amends the impairment model for available-for-sale securities.  An entity will recognize an allowance for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities as a contra-account to the amortized cost basis rather than as a direct reduction of the amortized cost basis of the investment, as is currently required.   ASU No. 2016-13 also requires new disclosures.  For financial assets measured at amortized cost, an entity will be required to disclose information about how it developed its allowance for credit losses, including changes in the factors that influenced management’s estimate of expected credit losses and the reasons for those changes.  For financing receivables and net investments in leases measured at amortized cost, an entity will be required to further disaggregate the information it currently discloses about the credit quality of these assets by year of the asset’s origination for as many as five annual periods. For available for sale securities, an entity will be required to provide a roll-forward of the allowance for credit losses and an aging analysis for securities that are past due.  ASU No. 2016-13 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Company is still evaluating the impact of adopting ASU No. 2016-13 on its financial statements, but does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2016-13 to have a material impact on its financial statements.

13

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU No. 2016-15”).  ASU No. 2016-15 is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows.  The amendments in ASU No. 2016-15 provide guidance on eight specific cash flow issues, including the following that are or may be relevant to the Company: (a) Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs should be classified as cash outflows for financing activities; (b) Cash payments relating to contingent consideration made soon after an acquisition’s consummation date (i.e., approximately three months or less) should be classified as cash outflows for investing activities. Payments made thereafter should be classified as cash outflows for financing activities up to the amount of the original contingent consideration liability. Payments made in excess of the amount of the original contingent consideration liability should be classified as cash outflows for operating activities; (c) Cash payments received from the settlement of insurance claims should be classified on the basis of the nature of the loss (or each component loss, if an entity receives a lump-sum settlement);  (d) Relating to distributions received from equity method investments, ASU No. 2016-15 provides an accounting policy election for classifying distributions received from equity method investments. Such amounts can be classified using a (1) cumulative earnings approach, or (2) nature of distribution approach. Under the cumulative earnings approach, an investor would compare the distributions received to its cumulative equity method earnings since inception.  Any distributions received up to the amount of cumulative equity earnings would be considered a return on investment and classified in operating activities. Any excess distributions would be considered a return of investment and classified in investing activities. Alternatively, an investor can choose to classify the distributions based on the nature of activities of the investee that generated the distribution. If the necessary information is subsequently not available for an investee to determine the nature of the activities, the entity should use the cumulative earnings approach for that investee and report a change in accounting principle on a retrospective basis;  (e) In the absence of specific guidance, an entity should classify each separately identifiable cash source and use on the basis of the nature of the underlying cash flows. For cash flows with aspects of more than one class that cannot be separated, the classification should be based on the activity that is likely to be the predominant source or use of cash flow.  ASU No. 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.  The Company is still evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2016-15 on its financial statements, but does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2016-15 to have a material impact on its financial statements.

3.
RECENT ACQUISITION OF REAL ESTATE
During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company acquired the following property (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Intangibles
 
 
Property Name
 
City
 
State
 
Acquisition Date
 
Land
 
Building
and Improvements
 
Tenant Origination 
and Absorption Costs
 
Above-Market
Lease Assets
 
Below-Market
Lease Liabilities
 
Total 
Purchase Price
Lincoln Court
 
Campbell
 
CA
 
05/20/2016
 
$
14,706

 
$
33,356

 
$
4,724

 
$

 
$
(1,445
)
 
$
51,341

The intangible assets and liabilities acquired in connection with this acquisition have weighted-average amortization periods as of the date of acquisition as follows (in years):
 
 
Tenant Origination and
Absorption Costs
 
Above-Market
Lease Assets
 
Below-Market
Lease Liabilities
Lincoln Court
 
3.7
 
 
2.1
The Company recorded the real estate acquisition as a business combination and expensed $1.5 million of acquisition costs. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recognized $2.3 million of total revenues and $0.9 million of operating expenses from this property.

14

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



4.
REAL ESTATE
As of September 30, 2016, the Company’s real estate portfolio was composed of two hotel properties and two office properties. The following table summarizes the Company’s real estate as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):
 
 
September 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Land
 
$
45,226

 
$
30,493

Buildings and improvements
 
125,676

 
79,081

Tenant origination and absorption costs
 
5,243

 
748

Other intangibles
 
244

 
244

Total real estate, cost
 
176,389

 
110,566

Accumulated depreciation and amortization
 
(5,090
)
 
(593
)
Total real estate, net
 
$
171,299

 
$
109,973

The following table provides summary information regarding the Company’s real estate as of September 30, 2016 (in thousands):
Property
 
Date
Acquired
 
City
 
State
 
Property Type
 
Land
 
Building
and Improvements
 
Tenant Origination and Absorption
 
Other Intangibles
 
Total
Real Estate, at Cost
 
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
 
Total
Real Estate, Net
 
Ownership %
Springmaid Beach Resort
 
12/30/2014
 
Myrtle Beach
 
SC
 
Hotel
 
$
27,438

 
$
30,762

 
$

 
$

 
$
58,200

 
$
(1,567
)
 
$
56,633

 
90.0
%
Q&C Hotel
 
12/17/2015
 
New Orleans
 
LA
 
Hotel
 
1,232

 
50,713

 

 
244

 
52,189

 
(1,889
)
 
50,300

 
90.0
%
2200 Paseo Verde
 
12/23/2015
 
Henderson
 
NV
 
Office
 
1,850

 
10,742

 
704

 

 
13,296

 
(454
)
 
12,842

 
100.0
%
Lincoln Court
 
05/20/2016
 
Campbell
 
CA
 
Office
 
14,706

 
33,459

 
4,539

 

 
52,704

 
(1,180
)
 
51,524

 
100.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
45,226

 
$
125,676

 
$
5,243

 
$
244

 
$
176,389

 
$
(5,090
)
 
$
171,299

 
 

15

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



Hotel Properties
The following table provides detailed information regarding Q&C Hotel and Springmaid Beach Resort’s hotel revenue and expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2016

2015
 
2016
 
2015
Hotel revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Room
 
$
6,499

 
$
5,219

 
$
15,180

 
$
9,807

Food, beverage and convention services
 
883

 
903

 
2,436

 
1,909

Campground
 
275

 
259

 
806

 
763

Other
 
942

 
841

 
2,141

 
1,640

Hotel revenues
 
$
8,599

 
$
7,222

 
$
20,563

 
$
14,119

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hotel expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Room
 
$
1,500

 
$
983

 
$
3,787

 
$
2,226

Food, beverage and convention services
 
842

 
611

 
2,188

 
1,416

General and administrative
 
590

 
399

 
1,696

 
1,088

Sales and marketing
 
453

 
212

 
1,236

 
684

Repairs and maintenance
 
485

 
416

 
1,345

 
1,109

Utilities
 
324

 
254

 
767

 
701

Property taxes and insurance
 
348

 
306

 
1,050

 
738

Other
 
615

 
508

 
1,397

 
1,143

Hotel expenses
 
$
5,157

 
$
3,689

 
$
13,466

 
$
9,105

Office Properties
As of September 30, 2016, the Company owned two office properties encompassing in the aggregate 183,347 rentable square feet which were 88% occupied. The following table provides detailed information regarding the Company’s office revenues and expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 (in thousands):
 
For the Three Months ended
September 30, 2016
 
For the Nine Months ended
September 30, 2016
Office revenues:
 
 
 
Rental income
$
1,817

 
$
3,165

Tenant reimbursements and other income
75

 
124

Office revenues
$
1,892

 
$
3,289

 
 
 
 
Office expenses:
 
 
 
Operating, maintenance, and management
$
328

 
$
552

Real estate taxes and insurance
193

 
308

Office expenses
$
521

 
$
860


16

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



Operating Leases
The Company’s office properties are leased to tenants under operating leases for which the terms and expirations vary. As of September 30, 2016, the leases had remaining terms, excluding options to extend, of up to 8.6 years with a weighted-average remaining term of 2.4 years. Some of the leases may have provisions to extend the term of the lease, options for early termination for all or a part of the leased premises after paying a specified penalty, rights of first refusal to purchase the property at competitive market rates, and other terms and conditions as negotiated. The Company retains substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the real estate assets leased to tenants. Generally, upon the execution of a lease, the Company requires a security deposit from the tenant in the form of a cash deposit and/or a letter of credit. The amount required as a security deposit varies depending upon the terms of the respective lease and the creditworthiness of the tenant, but generally is not a significant amount. Therefore, exposure to credit risk exists to the extent that a receivable from a tenant exceeds the amount of its security deposit. Security deposits received in cash related to office tenant leases are included in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and totaled $0.7 million and $0.1 million as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
As of September 30, 2016, the future minimum rental income from the Company’s office properties under its non-cancelable operating leases was as follows (in thousands):
October 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
$
1,476

2017
5,388

2018
4,144

2019
2,781

2020
1,392

Thereafter
1,970

 
$
17,151

Probable Real Estate Investment
Lofts at NoHo Commons
On September 29, 2016, the Company, through a joint venture (the “Lofts at NoHo Commons Joint Venture”) between the Company’s indirect wholly owned subsidiary and Noho Commons Pacific Investors LLC (the “JV Partner”), entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Redrock Noho Residential, LLC to acquire a 292-unit apartment building in North Hollywood, California (the “Lofts at NoHo Commons”). Neither the JV Partner nor the seller is affiliated with the Company or the Advisor.  The contractual purchase price of the Lofts at NoHo Commons is $102.5 million plus closing costs.
The Company owns a 90% equity interest in the Lofts at NoHo Commons Joint Venture. Income, losses and distributions are generally allocated based on the members’ respective equity interests, subject to adjustments based on certain performance thresholds set forth in the joint venture agreement. Additionally, in certain circumstances described in the joint venture agreement, the Company and the JV Partner may be required to make additional capital contributions to the joint venture, in proportion to the members’ respective equity interests.
Pursuant to the purchase and sale agreement, the Lofts at NoHo Commons Joint Venture would be obligated to purchase the property only after satisfaction of agreed-upon closing conditions. There can be no assurance that the Lofts at NoHo Commons Joint Venture will complete the acquisition. In some circumstances, if the Lofts at NoHo Commons Joint Venture fails to complete the acquisition after the expiration of the due diligence period, it may forfeit up to $3.0 million.

17

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



The Lofts at NoHo Commons is located in North Hollywood, California and consists of 292 apartment units, encompassing 224,755 rentable square feet. The Lofts at NoHo Commons was constructed in 2007, and as of September 29, 2016, was 94% occupied. As of the date of this filing, the Lofts at NoHo Commons Joint Venture has not completed the acquisition of the property.
5.
REAL ESTATE LOAN RECEIVABLE
As of September 30, 2016, the Company had originated one real estate loan receivable as follows (dollars in thousands):
Loan Name
Location of Related Property or 
Collateral
 
Date Originated
 
Property Type
 
Loan Type
 
Outstanding Principal Balance
as of
September 30, 2016
 
Book Value as of
September 30, 2016
(1)
 
Book Value as of
December 31, 2015
(1)
 
Contractual Interest Rate (2)
 
Annualized Effective Interest Rate (2)
 
Maturity Date
655 Summer Street First Mortgage
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Boston, Massachusetts
 
09/04/2014
 
Office
 
Mortgage
 
$
3,500

 
$
3,424

 
$
3,372

 
9.25%
 
11.68%
 
10/01/2017
_____________________
(1) Book value of the real estate loan receivable represents outstanding principal balance adjusted for unamortized origination fees and direct origination and acquisition costs.
(2) Contractual interest rate is the stated interest rate on the face of the loan. Annualized effective interest rate is calculated as the actual interest income recognized in 2016, using the interest method annualized (if applicable) and divided by the average amortized cost basis of the investment. The annualized effective interest rate and contractual interest rate presented are as of September 30, 2016.
The following summarizes the activity related to the real estate loan receivable for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 (in thousands):
Real estate loan receivable - December 31, 2015
 
$
3,372

Amortization of closing costs and origination fees on real estate loan receivable
 
52

Real estate loan receivable - September 30, 2016
 
$
3,424

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, interest income from the real estate loan receivable consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Contractual interest income
$
83

 
$
83

 
$
246

 
$
245

Amortization of closing costs and origination fees, net
18

 
16

 
52

 
46

Interest income from real estate loan receivable
$
101

 
$
99

 
$
298

 
$
291


18

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



6.
NOTES PAYABLE
As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company’s notes payable consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
 
Book Value as of September 30, 2016
 
Book Value as of December 31, 2015
 
Contractual Interest Rate (1)
 
Effective Interest Rate (1)
 
Payment Type
 
Maturity Date
Springmaid Beach Resort Mortgage Loan
 
$
38,000

 
$
26,000

 
One-month LIBOR + 3.00%
 
3.52%
 
Interest Only
 
12/30/2017
Q&C Hotel Mortgage Loan
 
28,330

 
28,330

 
One-month LIBOR + 3.25%
 
3.77%
 
Interest Only (2)
 
12/17/2018
2200 Paseo Verde Mortgage Loan
 
7,430

 
7,430

 
One-month LIBOR + 2.25%
 
2.77%
 
Interest Only
 
01/01/2017
Lincoln Court Mortgage Loan (3)
 
33,500

 

 
One-month LIBOR + 1.75%
 
2.28%
 
Interest Only
 
06/01/2020
Total notes payable principal outstanding
 
107,260

 
61,760

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      Deferred financing costs, net
 
(1,022
)
 
(924
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total notes payable, net
 
$
106,238

 
$
60,836

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
_____________________
(1) Contractual interest rate represents the interest rate in effect under the loan as of September 30, 2016. Effective interest rate is calculated as the actual interest rate in effect as of September 30, 2016 (consisting of the contractual interest rate and contractual floor rates), using interest rate indices at September 30, 2016, where applicable.
(2) Beginning February 1, 2018, monthly payments also include principal amortization payments of $55,000 per month, unless certain conditions described in the loan documents are satisfied.
(3) See —Recent Financing Transaction — Lincoln Mortgage Loan.
As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company’s deferred financing costs were $1.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively, net of amortization, and are included in notes payable, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company incurred $0.9 million and $2.4 million of interest expense, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred $0.3 million and $0.9 million of interest expense, respectively. As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, $0.3 million and $0.1 million was payable, respectively. Included in interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $0.1 million and $0.4 million of amortization of deferred financing costs, respectively. Also included in interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $1,000 and $43,000 of interest expense incurred as a result of the Company’s interest rate cap agreements, respectively. Additionally, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company capitalized $54,000 and $126,000 of interest related to its redevelopment project at Springmaid Beach Resort, respectively. Included in interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $0.1 million and $0.2 million of amortization of deferred financing costs, respectively. Also included in interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $14,000 and $68,000 of interest expense incurred as a result of the Company’s interest rate cap agreements, respectively.
The following is a schedule of maturities, including principal amortization payments, for all notes and bond payable outstanding as of September 30, 2016 (in thousands):
October 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
 
$

2017
 
45,430

2018
 
28,330

2019
 

2020
 
33,500

 
 
$
107,260


19

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



The Company’s notes payable contain financial and non-financial debt covenants. As of September 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants.
The Company’s note payable with respect to the Springmaid Beach Resort Mortgage Loan requires the Company to maintain a minimum working capital reserve in an amount sufficient to fund the working capital requirements of the Springmaid Beach Resort through the off-peak season, which amount shall be reduced by any amounts for working capital reserved by the third-party hotel operator. In addition, until certain renovations are complete, the loan documents impose a “cash trap” which restricts the use of accumulated cash from the Springmaid Beach Resort to the payment of working capital shortfalls, renovation expenditures and distributions required to satisfy the Company’s REIT requirements. The working capital reserve was included in restricted cash on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Recent Financing Transaction
Lincoln Court Mortgage Loan
On May 20, 2016, in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Lincoln Court, the Company, through an indirect wholly owned subsidiary (the “Lincoln Court Owner”), entered into a four-year mortgage loan with an unaffiliated lender (the “Lender”) for borrowings of up to $36.2 million secured by Lincoln Court (the “Lincoln Court Mortgage Loan”). At closing, $33.5 million of the loan was funded and the remaining $2.7 million was available for future disbursements to be used for tenant improvement and leasing commission costs, subject to certain terms and conditions contained in the loan documents.
The Lincoln Court Mortgage Loan matures on June 1, 2020, with a one-year extension option, subject to certain terms and conditions contained in the loan documents, including the payment of an extension fee, equal to 0.125% of the amount committed under the loan. The Lincoln Court Mortgage Loan bears interest at a floating rate of 175 basis points over one-month LIBOR. The Lincoln Court Owner has the right to repay the loan in whole at any time, or in part from time to time. Prepayments made before June 1, 2017 are subject to an exit fee equal to 0.5% of any principal amount prepaid.
KBS SOR US Properties II LLC (“SOR US Properties II”), the Company’s indirect wholly owned subsidiary, is providing a guaranty of an amount not greater than 25% of the outstanding balance of the Lincoln Court Mortgage Loan with respect to certain potential fees, costs, expenses, losses or damages incurred or suffered by the lender as a result of certain intentional actions committed by the Lincoln Court Owner in violation of the loan documents. SOR US Properties II is also providing a guaranty of the principal balance and any interest or other sums outstanding under the Lincoln Court Mortgage Loan in the event of certain bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings involving the Lincoln Court Owner, certain direct or indirect transfers or financings of Lincoln Court in violation of the loan documents and the violation of certain other terms of the loan documents by the Lincoln Court Owner.
7.
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
The Company enters into derivative instruments for risk management purposes to hedge its exposure to cash flow variability caused by changing interest rates. The primary goal of the Company’s risk management practices related to interest rate risk is to prevent changes in interest rates from adversely impacting the Company’s ability to achieve its investment return objectives. The Company does not enter into the derivatives for speculative purposes.
The Company enters into interest rate caps to mitigate its exposure to rising interest rates on its variable rate notes payable. The values of interest rate caps are primarily impacted by interest rates, market expectations about interest rates, and the remaining life of the instrument. In general, increases in interest rates, or anticipated increases in interest rates, will increase the value of interest rate caps. As the remaining life of an interest rate cap decreases, the value of the instrument will generally decrease towards zero.

20

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had two interest rate caps outstanding, which were not designated as hedging instruments. The following table summarizes the notional amount and other information related to the Company’s derivative instruments as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The notional amount is an indication of the extent of the Company’s involvement in each instrument at that time, but does not represent exposure to credit, interest rate or market risks (dollars in thousands):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value of Asset
 
 
Derivative Instruments
 
Effective Date
 
Maturity Date
 
Notional Value
 
Reference Rate
 
September 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
Balance Sheet Location
Interest Rate Cap
 
12/29/2014
 
01/01/2018
 
$
26,000

 
One-month LIBOR at 3.00%
 
$

 
$
5

 
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Interest Rate Cap
 
12/16/2015
 
12/23/2018
 
$
28,330

 
One-month LIBOR at 3.00%
 
2

 
40

 
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Total derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments
 
 
 
$
2

 
$
45

 
 
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded an unrealized loss of $1,000 and $43,000 on its derivative instruments, respectively, which was included in interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded an unrealized loss of $14,000 and $68,000 on its derivative instrument, respectively, which was included in interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
8.
FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
Under GAAP, the Company is required to measure certain financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis. In addition, the Company is required to measure other non-financial and financial assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis (e.g., carrying value of impaired real estate loans receivable and long-lived assets). Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The GAAP fair value framework uses a three-tiered approach. Fair value measurements are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level 1: unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2: quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model‑derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and
Level 3: prices or valuation techniques where little or no market data is available that requires inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
The fair value for certain financial instruments is derived using a combination of market quotes, pricing models and other valuation techniques that involve significant management judgment. The price transparency of financial instruments is a key determinant of the degree of judgment involved in determining the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments. Financial instruments for which actively quoted prices or pricing parameters are available and for which markets contain orderly transactions will generally have a higher degree of price transparency than financial instruments for which markets are inactive or consist of non-orderly trades. The Company evaluates several factors when determining if a market is inactive or when market transactions are not orderly. The following is a summary of the methods and assumptions used by management in estimating the fair value of each class of assets and liabilities for which it is practicable to estimate the fair value:
Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, rent and other receivables and accounts payable and accrued liabilities: These balances approximate their fair values due to the short maturities of these items.

21

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



Real estate loan receivable: The Company’s real estate loan receivable is presented in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at its amortized cost net of recorded loan loss reserves (if any) and not at fair value. The fair value of real estate loan receivable was estimated using an internal valuation model that considered the expected cash flows for the loan, underlying collateral value (for collateral-dependent loans) and estimated yield requirements of institutional investors for loans with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term, loan-to-value, type of collateral and other credit enhancements. The Company classifies these inputs as Level 3 inputs.
Derivative instruments: The Company’s derivative instruments are presented at fair value on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The valuation of these instruments are determined using a proprietary model that utilizes observable inputs. As such, the Company classifies these inputs as Level 2 inputs. The proprietary model uses the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, as well as observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and volatility. The fair value of interest rate caps (floors) are determined using the market standard methodology of discounting the future expected cash payments (receipts) which would occur if variable interest rates rise above (below) the strike rate of the caps (floors). The variable interest rates used in the calculation of projected payments (receipts) on the cap (floor) are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observed market interest rate curves and volatilities.
Notes payable: The fair value of the Company’s notes payable are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on management’s estimates of current market interest rates for instruments with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term, loan-to-value ratio, type of collateral and other credit enhancements. Additionally, when determining the fair value of liabilities in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available, the Company measures fair value using (i) a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset or quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets or (ii) another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurement, such as the income approach or the market approach. The Company classifies these inputs as Level 3 inputs.
The following were the face value, carrying amount and fair value of the Company’s financial instruments as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, which carrying amounts do not approximate the fair values (in thousands):
 
September 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
Face Value
 
Carrying Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Face Value
 
Carrying Amount
 
Fair Value
Financial asset:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate loan receivable
$
3,500

 
$
3,424

 
$
3,379

 
$
3,500

 
$
3,372

 
$
3,311

Financial liability:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes payable
$
107,260

 
$
106,238

 
$
106,990

 
$
61,760

 
$
60,836

 
$
61,880

Disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to the Company as of the period end and requires a significant amount of judgment. Despite increased capital market and credit market activity, transaction volume for certain financial instruments remains relatively low. This has made the estimation of fair values difficult and, therefore, both the actual results and the Company’s estimate of value at a future date could be materially different.
As of September 30, 2016, the Company measured the following assets at fair value (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
Total        
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets 
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)        
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)         
Recurring Basis:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset derivatives - interest rate caps
 
$
2

 
$

 
$
2

 
$


22

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



9.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company has entered into the Advisory Agreement with the Advisor and dealer manager agreements with the Dealer Manager with respect to the Private Offering and the Public Offering. These agreements entitle the Advisor and the Dealer Manager to specified fees upon the provision of certain offering-related services and the investment of funds in real estate-related investments, among other services, as well as reimbursement of organization and offering costs incurred by the Advisor and the Dealer Manager on behalf of the Company and certain costs incurred by the Advisor in providing services to the Company. In addition, the Advisor is entitled to certain other fees, including an incentive fee upon achieving certain performance goals, as described in the Advisory Agreement. The Advisor also serves as the advisor for KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (“KBS REIT I”), KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. (“KBS REIT II”), KBS Real Estate Investment Trust III, Inc. (“KBS REIT III”), KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc. (“KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT”), KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT, Inc. (“KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT”) and KBS Growth & Income REIT, Inc. (“KBS Growth & Income REIT”). The Dealer Manager also serves as the dealer manager for the public offering of KBS Growth & Income REIT and for the dividend reinvestment plan offerings for KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT, KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT and KBS REIT III.
Under the Amended Dealer Manager Agreement, the Dealer Manager receives an annual stockholder servicing fee of 1.0% of the purchase price per share (ignoring any discounts that may be available to certain categories of purchasers) of Class T common stock sold in the primary portion of the Public Offering. Such fee is payable solely to the extent there is a third party broker dealer of record with respect to such Class T share that has entered into a currently effective selected dealer agreement or servicing agreement that provides for the payment to such broker dealer of the stockholder servicing fee with respect to such Class T share, and such broker dealer of record is in compliance with the applicable terms of such selected dealer agreement or servicing agreement related to such payment. To the extent payable, the stockholder servicing fee will accrue daily and be paid monthly in arrears, and the Dealer Manager will reallow 100% of the stockholder servicing fee to such broker dealer of record for services provided to Class T stockholders after the initial sale of the Class T share.  In addition, no stockholder servicing fee will be paid with respect to Class T shares purchased through the dividend reinvestment plan or issued pursuant to a stock dividend.
On January 6, 2014, the Company, together with KBS REIT I, KBS REIT II, KBS REIT III, KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT, the Dealer Manager, the Advisor and other KBS-affiliated entities, entered into an errors and omissions and directors and officers liability insurance program where the lower tiers of coverage are shared. The cost of these lower tiers is allocated by the Advisor and its insurance broker among each of the various entities covered by the plan, and is billed directly to each entity. The allocation of these shared coverage costs is proportionate to the pricing by the insurance marketplace for the first tiers of directors and officers liability coverage purchased individually by each REIT. The Advisor’s and the Dealer Manager’s portion of the shared lower tiers’ cost is proportionate to the respective entities’ prior cost for the errors and omissions insurance. In June 2015, KBS Growth & Income REIT was added to the insurance program at terms similar to those described above. The insurance program was renewed and is effective through June 30, 2017.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, no other business transactions occurred between the Company and these other KBS-sponsored programs.
The Advisory Agreement has a one-year term that expires August 12, 2017. The Company may terminate the Advisory Agreement on 60 days’ written notice. The Advisor in its sole discretion may defer any fee payable to it under the Advisory Agreement. All or any portion of such fee not taken may be deferred without interest and paid when the Advisor determines.

23

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



Pursuant to the terms of these agreements, summarized below are the related-party costs incurred by the Company for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and any related amounts payable as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):
 
Incurred
 
Payable as of
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
September 30,
 
December 31,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Expensed
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset management fees
$
359

 
$
89

 
$
908

 
$
257

 
$

 
$

Reimbursable operating expenses (1)
75

 
46

 
337

 
147

 
29

 
26

Real estate acquisition fee (2)

 

 
1,341

 

 
95

 
108

Capitalized
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Acquisition fees (2)
25

 

 
228

 

 
166

 

Additional Paid-in Capital
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sales commissions
1,074

 
605

 
2,808

 
1,323

 

 

Dealer manager fees
678

 
303

 
1,460

 
786

 

 

Stockholder servicing fees (3)
1,509

 

 
1,509

 

 
1,474

 

Reimbursable other offering costs
157

 
603

 
177

 
1,891

 
157

 
2,222

 
$
3,877

 
$
1,646

 
$
8,768

 
$
4,404

 
$
1,921

 
$
2,356

_____________________
(1) Reimbursable operating expenses primarily consists of internal audit personnel costs, accounting software and cyber-security related expenses incurred by the Advisor under the Advisory Agreement. The Company has reimbursed the Advisor for the Company’s allocable portion of the salaries, benefits, and overhead of internal audit department personnel providing services to the Company. These amounts totaled $75,000 and $333,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, and $46,000 and $120,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, and were the only employee costs reimbursed under the Advisory Agreement for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.  The Company will not reimburse for employee costs in connection with services for which the Advisor earns acquisition or origination fees or disposition fees (other than reimbursement of travel and communication expenses) or for the salaries or benefits the Advisor or its affiliates may pay to the Company’s executive officers. In addition to the amounts above, the Company reimburses the Advisor for certain of the Company's direct costs incurred from third parties that were initially paid by the Advisor on behalf of the Company.
(2) Acquisition fees are expensed at the time of acquisition on real estate investments. Acquisition fees on investment in unconsolidated entities are capitalized into the cost basis of the investment. Acquisition fees on significant capital expenditures related to the development, construction or improvement of the investment budgeted as of the date of acquisition are capitalized.
(3) See Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Selling Commissions, Dealer Manager Fees and Stockholder Servicing Fee.”
During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Advisor reimbursed the Company $87,000 for legal and professional fees and property insurance rebates. 
Offering Costs
Organization and offering costs (other than selling commissions, dealer manager fees and the stockholder servicing fee) of the Company may be paid by the Advisor, the Dealer Manager or their affiliates on behalf of the Company or may be paid directly by the Company. These offering costs include all expenses incurred by the Company in connection with the Private Offering and the Public Offering. Organization costs include all expenses incurred by the Company in connection with the formation of the Company, including but not limited to legal fees and other costs to incorporate the Company. The Company reimbursed the Dealer Manager for underwriting compensation in connection with the Private Offering. The Company also paid directly or reimbursed the Dealer Manager for due diligence expenses of broker dealers in connection with the Private Offering.

24

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



During the Private Offering, there was no limit on the amount of organization and offering costs the Company could incur. As of September 30, 2016, the Company had recorded $1.0 million of offering costs (other than selling commissions and dealer manager fees) related to the Private Offering, all of which was initially paid by the Advisor or its affiliates on behalf of the Company and subsequently reimbursed by the Company. In addition, the Company paid $1.9 million in selling commissions and dealer manager fees related to the Private Offering.
During the Public Offering, pursuant to the Advisory Agreement and the Dealer Manager Agreement, the Company is obligated to reimburse the Advisor, the Dealer Manager or their affiliates, as applicable, for organization and other offering costs paid by them on behalf of the Company, provided that no reimbursements made by the Company to the Advisor or the Dealer Manager may cause total organization and offering expenses incurred by the Company (including selling commissions, dealer manager fees, the stockholder servicing fee to exceed 15% of the aggregate gross proceeds from the Public Offering as of the date of reimbursement. In addition, at the termination of the primary portion of the Public Offering, the Advisor and its affiliates will reimburse the Company to the extent that the organization and other offering expenses (which exclude selling commissions, dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees) paid directly or reimbursed by the Company in connection with the primary portion of the Public Offering, regardless of when incurred, exceed 1.0% of gross offering proceeds from the primary portion of the Public Offering. The Advisor and its affiliates will be responsible for any organization and other offering expenses related to the primary portion of the Public Offering to the extent they exceed 1.0% of gross proceeds from the primary portion of the Public Offering as of the termination of the primary portion of the Public Offering.
Through September 30, 2016, the Advisor and its affiliates had incurred organization and other offering costs (which exclude selling commissions, dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees) on the Company’s behalf in connection with the Public Offering of approximately $7.7 million. As of September 30, 2016, the Company had paid $8.3 million in selling commissions and dealer manager fees and accrued $1.5 million of stockholder servicing fees. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had paid or accrued $3.3 million of other organization and offering expenses. After December 31, 2015, the Company reversed $2.2 million of accrued organization and offering expenses due to affiliates as a result of an amendment to the advisory agreement, which limits organization and other offering costs to 1.0% of gross proceeds from the primary portion of the Public Offering, as described above. As of September 30, 2016, the Company had recorded $1.2 million of other organization and offering expenses, which amounts represent the Company’s maximum liability for organization and other offering costs as of September 30, 2016 based on the 1.0% limitation described above.
10.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The Company acquired one office property during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, which was accounted for as a business combination. The following unaudited pro forma information for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 has been prepared to give effect to the acquisition of Lincoln Court as if this acquisition occurred on January 1, 2015. This pro forma information does not purport to represent what the actual results of operations of the Company would have been had the acquisition occurred on this date, nor does it purport to predict the results of operations for future periods (in thousands).
 
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Revenues
 
$
10,592

 
$
8,566

 
$
26,284

 
$
18,146

Depreciation and amortization
 
$
2,314

 
$
672

 
$
6,120

 
$
2,011

Net income (loss)
 
$
749

 
$
2,491

 
$
(418
)
 
$
2,164

The unaudited pro forma information for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was adjusted to exclude $1.5 million of acquisition costs related to Lincoln Court incurred by the Company in 2016.

25

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



11. INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITY
On June 28, 2016, the Company originated a participating loan facility in an amount up to €2.6 million ($2.9 million at closing). The Company funded approximately €2.1 million ($2.3 million at closing). The proceeds were used by the borrower to fund a 5% general partner interest in a joint venture acquiring a portfolio of light industrial properties located throughout France. The total acquisition cost of the portfolio was approximately €95.5 million ($105.6 million at closing). Under the terms of the participating loan facility, the Company participates in the expected residual profits of the portfolio and the terms are structured in a manner such that the risks and rewards of the arrangement are similar to those associated with an investment in a real estate joint venture. Accordingly, the participating loan facility is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. In addition to the amount funded at closing, the Company also capitalized an additional $0.2 million of acquisition costs and fees. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recognized $0.1 million of income with respect to this investment.
12.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Management Agreement
Springmaid Beach Resort
The consolidated joint venture entity through which the Company leases the operations for Springmaid Beach Resort has entered into a management agreement with Doubletree Management LLC, an independent third-party hotel operator (the “Operator”) pursuant to which the Operator will manage and operate the Springmaid Beach Resort. The hotel was branded a DoubleTree by Hilton in September 2016 (the “Brand Commencement Date”).
Pursuant to the management agreement the Operator will receive the following fees:
a base fee, which is a percentage of total operating revenue that starts at 2.5% and increases to 2.75% in the second year following the Brand Commencement Date and further increases in the third year following the Brand Commencement Date and thereafter to 3.0%;
a campground area management fee, which is 2% of any campground revenue;
an incentive fee, which is 15% of operating cash flow (after deduction for capital renewals reserve and the joint venture owner’s priority, which is 12% of the joint venture owner’s total investment);
an additional services fee in the amount reasonably determined by the Operator from time to time; and
a brand services fee in the amount of 4% of total rooms revenue, and an other brand services fee in an amount determined by the Operator from time to time.
The management agreement contains specific standards for the operation and maintenance of the hotel, which allows the Operator to maintain uniformity in the system created by the Operator’s franchise. Such standards generally regulate the appearance of the hotel, quality and type of goods and services offered, signage and protection of trademarks. Compliance with the management agreement will require the Company to make significant expenditures for capital improvements.     
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company incurred $179,000 and $369,000 of fees related to the management agreement, respectively, which are included in hotel expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred $180,000 and $350,000 of fees related to the management agreement, respectively, which are included in hotel expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

26

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



Q&C Hotel
A wholly owned subsidiary of the joint venture through which the Company leases the operations of the Q&C Hotel (“Q&C Hotel Operations”) has entered into a management agreement with Encore Hospitality, LLC (“Encore Hospitality”), an affiliate of the joint venture partner, pursuant to which Encore Hospitality will manage and operate the Q&C Hotel. The management agreement expires on December 17, 2035. Subject to certain conditions, Encore Hospitality may extend the term of the agreement for a period of five years. Pursuant to the management agreement Encore Hospitality will receive a base fee, which is 4.0% of gross revenue (as defined in the management agreement). During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company incurred $57,000 and $227,000, respectively, of fees related to the management agreement, which are included in hotel expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Q&C Hotel Operations has also entered into a franchise agreement with Marriott International (“Marriott”) pursuant to which Marriott has granted Q&C Hotel Operations a limited, non-exclusive license to establish and operate the Q&C Hotel using certain of Marriott’s proprietary marks and systems and the hotel was branded as a Marriott Autograph Collection hotel on May 25, 2016. The franchise agreement will expire on May 25, 2041. Pursuant to the franchise agreement, Q&C Hotel Operations pays Marriott a monthly franchise fee equal to a percent of gross room sales on a sliding scale that is initially 2% and increases to 5% on May 25, 2019 and a monthly marketing fund contribution fee equal to 1.5% of the Q&C Hotel’s gross room sales. In addition, the franchise agreement requires the maintenance of a reserve account to fund all renovations at the hotel based on a percentage of gross revenues which starts at 2% of gross revenues and increases to 5% of gross revenues on May 25, 2019. Q&C Hotel Operations is also responsible for the payment of certain other fees, charges and costs as set forth in the agreement. During the the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company incurred $115,000 and $157,000 of fees related to the Marriott franchise agreement, respectively, which are included in hotel expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
In addition, in connection with the execution of the franchise agreement, SOR US Properties II is providing an unconditional guarantee that all Q&C Hotel Operations’ obligations under the franchise agreement will be punctually paid and performed. Finally, certain transfers of the Q&C Hotel or an ownership interest therein are subject to a notice and consent requirement, and the franchise agreement further provides Marriott with a right of first refusal with respect to a sale of the hotel to a competitor of Marriott.
Economic Dependency
The Company is dependent on the Advisor and the Dealer Manager for certain services that are essential to the Company, including the sale of the Company’s shares of common stock; the identification, evaluation, negotiation, origination, acquisition and disposition of investments; management of the daily operations of the Company’s investment portfolio; and other general and administrative responsibilities. In the event that these companies are unable to provide the respective services, the Company will be required to obtain such services from other sources.
Environmental
As an owner of real estate, the Company is subject to various environmental laws of federal, state and local governments. Although there can be no assurance, the Company is not aware of any environmental liability that could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations as of September 30, 2016. However, changes in applicable environmental laws and regulations, the uses and conditions of properties in the vicinity of the Company’s properties, the activities of its tenants and other environmental conditions of which the Company is unaware with respect to the properties could result in future environmental liabilities.
Legal Matters
From time to time, the Company is a party to legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of its business. Management is not aware of any legal proceedings of which the outcome is probable or reasonably possible to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition, which would require accrual or disclosure of the contingency and the possible range of loss. Additionally, the Company has not recorded any loss contingencies related to legal proceedings in which the potential loss is deemed to be remote.

27

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



13.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company evaluates subsequent events up until the date the consolidated financial statements are issued.
Status of the Offering
The Company commenced the Public Offering on August 12, 2014 and broke escrow on January 7, 2015. As of November 8, 2016, the Company had sold 8,644,798 and 4,755,756 shares of Class A and Class T common stock in the Public Offering, respectively, for aggregate gross offering proceeds of $130.8 million. Included in these amounts were 195,574 and 22,876 shares of Class A and Class T common stock sold under our dividend reinvestment plan, respectively, for aggregate gross offering proceeds of $1.9 million.
Cash Distributions Paid
On October 3, 2016, the Company paid distributions of $0.2 million related to cash distributions on the outstanding shares of the common stock based on daily record dates for the period from September 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016. On November 1, 2016, the Company paid distributions of $0.3 million related to cash distributions on the outstanding shares of the common stock based on daily record dates for the period from October 1, 2016 through October 31, 2016. Distributions for these periods were calculated based on stockholders of record each day during these periods at a rate of (i) $0.00052404 per share per day less (ii) the applicable daily stockholder servicing fees accrued for and allocable to any class of common stock, divided by the number of shares of common stock of such class outstanding as of the close of business on each respective record date.
On October 5, 2016, the Company paid distributions of $0.8 million related to a one-time cash distribution in the amount of $0.05 per share on the outstanding shares of all classes of common stock to stockholders of record as of the close of business on September 27, 2016.
Stock Dividends Issued
On August 11, 2016, the Company’s board of directors authorized stock dividends for the month of September 2016, in the amount of 0.001667 shares of each class of the Company’s common stock on each outstanding share of common stock issuable to all common stockholders of record as of the close of business on September 30, 2016. The Company issued the September 2016 stock dividend, consisting of 28,420 shares, on October 4, 2016.
Also, on August 11, 2016, the Company’s board of directors authorized stock dividends for the month of October 2016, in the amount of 0.001667 shares of each class of the Company’s common stock on each outstanding share of common stock issuable to all common stockholders of record as of the close of business on October 31, 2016. The Company issued the October 2016 stock dividend, consisting of 30,341 shares, on November 2, 2016.
On September 27, 2016, the Company’s board of directors authorized a one-time stock dividend in the amount of 0.015 shares of common stock to all common stockholders of record as of the close of business on September 27, 2016. The Company issued the one-time stock dividend, consisting of 254,287 shares, on October 6, 2016.

28

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



Distributions Declared
On October 11, 2016, the Company’s board of directors declared cash distributions on the outstanding shares of all classes of common stock based on daily record dates for the period from November 1, 2016 through November 30, 2016, which the Company expects to pay in December 2016. On November 10, 2016, the Company’s board of directors declared cash distributions on the outstanding shares of all classes of common stock based on daily record dates for the period from December 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and January 1, 2017 through January 31, 2017, which the Company expects to pay in January and February 2017, respectively. Distributions for the period from November 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 will be calculated based on stockholders of record each day during these periods at a rate of (i) $0.00052404 per share per day less (ii) the applicable daily stockholder servicing fees accrued for and allocable to any class of common stock, divided by the number of shares of common stock of such class outstanding as of the close of business on each respective record date. Distributions for the period from January 1, 2017 through January 31, 2017 will be calculated based on stockholders of record each day during these periods at a rate of (i) $0.00052548 per share per day less (ii) the applicable daily stockholder servicing fees accrued for and allocable to any class of common stock, divided by the number of shares of common stock of such class outstanding as of the close of business on each respective record date.
Also on October 11, 2016, the Company’s board of directors authorized monthly stock dividends for the month of November 2016, in the amount of 0.001667 shares of each class of the Company’s common stock on each outstanding share of common stock issuable to all common stockholders of record as of the close of business on November 30, 2016, which the Company expects to issue in December 2016. Also on November 10, 2016, the Company’s board of directors authorized monthly stock dividends for the months of December 2016 and January 2017, each in the amount of 0.001667 shares of each class of the Company’s common stock on each outstanding share of common stock issuable to all common stockholders of record as of the close of business on December 31, 2016 and January 31, 2017, respectively, which the Company expects to issue in January 2017 and February 2017, respectively. Stock dividends are issued in the same class of shares as the shares for which such stockholder received the stock dividend.
Springmaid Beach Resort
In October 2016, Springmaid Beach Resort Hotel, which is located in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, sustained significant damage from Hurricane Matthew. The Company is in the process of assessing the extent of the property damage at Springmaid Beach Resort Hotel and quantify the financial impact to the Company’s financial statements.
Probable Real Estate Investment
210 West 31st Street
On October 28, 2016, the Company, through a indirect wholly owned subsidiary, entered into a joint venture (the “210 West 31st Street Joint Venture”) with Onyx 31st Street LLC (the “210 West 31st Street JV Partner”). A wholly owned subsidiary of the 210 West 31st Street Joint Venture then entered into a purchase and sale agreement with the 210 West 31st Street JV Partner whereby the 210 West 31st Street JV Partner would assign 80% of its interest in a ground lease in 210 West 31st Street, New York, New York (“210 West 31st Street”) to the wholly owned subsidiary of the 210 West 31st Street Joint Venture. The 210 West 31st Street JV Partner would retain a 20% interest in the ground lease in 210 West 31st Street and contribute this interest in exchange for a 20% interest in the 210 West 31st Street Joint Venture. The 210 West 31st Street JV Partner is not affiliated with the Company or the Advisor.  The contractual purchase price of the 80% interest in the ground lease is $38.4 million plus closing costs and the remaining 20% interest has an attributable value of $9.6 million.
The Company owns an 80% equity interest in the 210 West 31st Street Joint Venture and is responsible for funding the purchase of the 80% interest in the ground lease. Income, losses and distributions are generally allocated based on the members’ respective equity interests, subject to adjustments based on certain performance thresholds set forth in the joint venture agreement. Additionally, in certain circumstances described in the joint venture agreement, the Company and the 210 West 31st Street JV Partner may be required to make additional capital contributions to the joint venture, in proportion to the members’ respective equity interests.

29

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30, 2016
(unaudited)



The 210 West 31st Street Joint Venture intends to fund the acquisition of 210 West 31st Street with capital contributions from its members and with proceeds from a mortgage loan. The 210 West 31st Street Joint Venture is currently negotiating the terms of the mortgage loan.
Pursuant to the purchase and sale agreement, the 210 West 31st Street Joint Venture would be obligated to purchase the property only after satisfaction of agreed-upon closing conditions. There can be no assurance that the 210 West 31st Street Joint Venture will complete the acquisition. In some circumstances, if the 210 West 31st Street Joint Venture fails to complete the acquisition it may forfeit up to $3.0 million.
210 West 31st Street is located in New York, New York and consists of an 8,637 square foot development site located directly across the street from Madison Square Garden and Penn Station. 210 West 31st Street is currently a 23,110 square foot, 2-story building with basement. The Company intends to make significant renovations or improvements to 210 West 31st Street, including demolishing the existing structure and redeveloping the property into a 2-story retail building with a lower level and a rooftop deck and currently estimates these renovation and improvements to cost approximately $14.2 million.



30

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements of KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc. and the notes thereto. As used herein, the terms “we,” “our” and “us” refer to KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc., a Maryland corporation, and, as required by context, KBS Strategic Opportunity Limited Partnership II, a Delaware limited partnership, which we refer to as the “Operating Partnership,” and to their subsidiaries.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc. and members of our management team, as well as the assumptions on which such statements are based, and generally are identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “seeks,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “should” or similar expressions. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. Further, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results over time, unless required by law.
The following are some of the risks and uncertainties, although not all of the risks and uncertainties, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements:
We have a limited operating history and as of September 30, 2016, our total assets were $253.0 million. You will not have an opportunity to evaluate our investments before we make them, making our future operations speculative.
We depend on our advisor to identify suitable investments and conduct our operations and our dealer manager to conduct our offering.
All of our executive officers, our affiliated directors and other key real estate and debt finance professionals are also officers, directors, managers, key professionals and/or holders of a direct or indirect controlling interest in our advisor, our dealer manager and other KBS-affiliated entities. As a result, they face conflicts of interest, including significant conflicts created by our advisor’s compensation arrangements with us and other KBS-advised programs and investors and conflicts in allocating time among us and these other programs and investors. These conflicts could result in unanticipated actions.
There is no assurance that we will raise the maximum offering amount in our initial public offering. If we raise substantially less than the maximum offering amount, we may not be able to invest in a diverse portfolio of real estate-related assets and the value of an investment in us may vary more widely with the performance of specific assets. There is a greater risk that stockholders will lose money in their investment in us if we have less diversity in our portfolio and our general and administrative expenses may constitute a greater percentage of our revenue.
Our advisor and its affiliates receive fees in connection with transactions involving the origination, acquisition and management of our investments. These fees will be based on the cost of the investment, and not based on the quality of the investment or the quality of the services rendered to us. This may influence our advisor to recommend riskier transactions to us and increase our stockholders’ risk of loss.
Our distribution policy is generally not to use offering proceeds to make distributions. However, we may pay distributions from any source, including, without limitation, from offering proceeds or borrowings (which may constitute a return of capital). If we pay distributions from sources other than our cash flow from operations, we will have less funds available for investment in properties and other assets, the overall return to our stockholders may be reduced and subsequent investors may experience dilution.
If we are unable to find suitable investments, we may not be able to achieve our investment objectives or pay distributions.
Our policies do not limit us from incurring debt until our total liabilities would exceed 75% of the cost of our tangible assets (before deducting depreciation and other non-cash reserves), and we may exceed this limit with the approval of the conflicts committee of our board of directors. During the early stages of our initial public offering, and to the extent financing in excess of this limit is available on attractive terms, our conflicts committee may approve debt such that our total liabilities would exceed this limit. High debt levels could limit the amount of cash we have available to distribute and could result in a decline in the value of an investment in us.
Disruptions in the financial markets and uncertain economic conditions could adversely affect our ability to implement our business strategy and generate returns to stockholders.


31

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Except with respect to unimproved or non-incoming producing property, we are not limited in the percentage of net proceeds that we may allocate to a specific real estate asset type. Thus, we may make all of our investments in investments which present an increased risk of loss. In addition, we may change our targeted investments and investment guidelines at any time without the consent of our stockholders, which could result in our making investments that are different from, and possibly riskier than, the investments we initially expect to focus on.
We expect to focus our investments in real estate-related loans and real estate-related debt securities in distressed debt, which involves more risk than in performing debt.
Our opportunistic property-acquisition strategy involves a higher risk of loss than would a strategy of investing in stabilized properties.
We have made foreign investments and will be susceptible to risks associated with such investments, including changes in currency exchange rates, adverse political or economic developments, lack of uniform accounting standards and changes in foreign laws.
All forward-looking statements should be read in light of the risks identified herein in Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors” and in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
Overview
We were formed on February 6, 2013 as a Maryland corporation and elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) beginning with the taxable year ending December 31, 2014. On July 3, 2013, we commenced a private placement offering exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), to offer a maximum of $105,000,000 of shares of common stock for sale to certain accredited investors, of which $5,000,000 of shares were offered pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan. We ceased offering shares in our private offering on August 11, 2014. KBS Capital Markets Group LLC, an affiliate of our advisor, served as the dealer manager of the offering pursuant to a dealer manager agreement and was responsible for marketing our shares in the offering.
On November 14, 2013, we filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to register for sale to the public a maximum of 180,000,000 shares of common stock, of which 80,000,000 shares were to be offered pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan. The SEC declared our registration statement effective on August 12, 2014 and we retained KBS Capital Markets Group LLC to serve as the dealer manager of the initial public offering pursuant to a dealer manager agreement. On February 11, 2016, we filed an amended registration statement on Form S-11 with the SEC to offer a second class of common stock designated as Class T shares and to designate our initially offered and outstanding common stock as Class A shares. Pursuant to the amended registration statement, we are offering to sell any combination of Class A and Class T shares in our primary offering and dividend reinvestment plan offering but in no event may we sell more than 180,000,000 of shares of our common stock pursuant to the offering. We commenced offering our Class T shares of our common stock for sale to the public on February 17, 2016. The dealer manager is responsible for marketing our shares in the initial public offering.
We intend to use substantially all of the net proceeds from our offerings to invest in and manage a diverse portfolio of real estate-related loans, opportunistic real estate, real estate-related debt securities and other real estate-related investments located in the United States and Europe. Such investments will include the acquisition of distressed debt, the origination and acquisition of mortgage, mezzanine, bridge and other real estate-related loans, investment in opportunistic real estate and investments in real estate-related debt securities such as residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations. We may also invest in entities that make similar investments. Although this is our current target portfolio, we may make adjustments to our target portfolio based on real estate market conditions and investment opportunities. We will not forego what we believe to be a good investment because it does not precisely fit our expected portfolio composition. As of September 30, 2016, we owned two hotel properties, two office properties, an investment in an unconsolidated entity and had originated a first mortgage loan. 
As of September 30, 2016, we had sold 8,288,466 and 3,931,258 shares of Class A and Class T common stock, respectively, for aggregate gross offering proceeds of $119.4 million in our initial public offering, including 129,281 and 3,058 shares of Class A and Class T of common stock under our dividend reinvestment plan, respectively, for aggregate gross offering proceeds of $1.3 million. Also as of September 30, 2016, we had redeemed 4,374 shares of Class A common stock for $40,000.

32

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

As of September 30, 2016, we had sold 3,619,851 shares of Class A common stock for gross offering proceeds of $32.2 million in our private offering. Additionally, on April 2, 2014 and July 31, 2014, we issued 120,106 shares and 132,116 shares of Class A common stock for $1.0 million and $1.1 million, respectively, in separate private transactions exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. 
We have no employees and KBS Capital Advisors LLC (“KBS Capital Advisors”) has served as our external advisor since commencement of the private offering. As our advisor, KBS Capital Advisors manages our day-to-day operations and manages our portfolio of real estate properties and real estate-related investments. KBS Capital Advisors will make recommendations on all investments to our board of directors. All proposed investments must be approved by at least a majority of our board of directors, including a majority of the conflicts committee. Unless otherwise provided by our charter, the conflicts committee may approve a proposed investment without action by the full board of directors if the approving members of the conflicts committee constitute at least a majority of the board of directors. KBS Capital Advisors also provides asset-management, marketing, investor-relations and other administrative services on our behalf.
We have formed a strategic relationship with STAM, a commercial real estate investment and asset management firm headquartered in Paris, France to support us and our advisor in connection with any investments we may make in Europe. Our advisor has entered a sub-advisory agreement with STAM, pursuant to which STAM will provide real estate acquisition and portfolio management services to our advisor in connection with any investments we may make in Europe. For investments in Europe we make directly and our ownership interest is 100%, our advisor will compensate STAM for its services in sourcing and managing these investments from the fees its earns from us under the advisory agreement with us and we will pay STAM no additional compensation. For investments we make through STAM, such as the participating loan facility we funded in June 2016, we will enter separate agreements with STAM to set forth compensation terms. We can give no assurances as to the number, if any, of investments we may make in Europe.
Market Outlook - Real Estate and Real Estate Finance Markets
The following discussion is based on management’s beliefs, observations and expectations with respect to the real estate and real estate finance markets.
Current conditions in the global capital markets remain volatile as we near the end of 2016. Current economic data and financial market developments suggest that the global economy is improving, although at a slow incremental rate. Growth in most advanced economies remains lackluster, with low potential growth expectations now extending into 2017. In this economic environment the central banks of the world’s major economies hold sway over perceived investment opportunities. Quantitative easing in Japan and the Eurozone has carried over into global capital markets and has increased demand for higher risk investments.
The initial reaction to the U.K. vote to leave the European Union has been somewhat muted, with the exception being the continued downward pressure on the Great Britain Pound (“GBP”). As of mid-October 2016, the GBP had weakened in excess of 20 percent, year-to-date. The new prime minister of the U.K. remains committed to carrying out the decoupling of the U.K. from the European Union. The details of this process remain unclear, and the uncertainty has weighed on both the U.K. and European markets. The European Central Bank has continued to pursue a policy of quantitative easing (QE).
In the United States, real GDP growth accelerated in the third quarter of 2016 to a 2.9% annual rate. This is a marked improvement over the second quarter growth rate of 1.4%. The strong third quarter number is tempered by the fact that a large portion of gross domestic product growth was seen in increased inventories, not through consumer demand. Consumer confidence is currently at a 3 year low. Corporate earnings are also an area of concern, as third quarter reported earnings growth showed a clear sign of slowing. Federal Reserve Board communications have been signaling the increased likelihood of some firming of monetary policy. Many economists expect an increase in rates to occur in early December. The US government bond yield curve has seen a steady increase in yields and is currently no longer sitting at near record lows.
Europe and Japan continue to engage in unconventional monetary policy. Asset purchases and stimulus programs in both regions have driven interest rates and investment yields to new lows. Both regions now have historically low interest rates, with some government and corporate bonds trading with negative yields. While the intent of these policies is to spur economic growth, the size of these programs is unprecedented, and the ultimate impact on those economies and the broader global financial system remains unclear.

33

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

The U.S. commercial real estate market continues to benefit from inflows of foreign capital, albeit at a slowing rate. With the backdrop global political conflict, and weaker international economic conditions, the U.S. dollar has remained a safe haven currency. Lenders, however, have continued to cool to the market. For balance sheet lenders, such as banks and insurance companies, underwriting standards for commercial real estate have been tightened. This has resulted in lower loan-to-value and higher debt coverage ratios. CMBS originations also have been limited as lenders are trying to adjust to the new securitization rules which require issuers to maintain an ongoing equity stake in pooled transactions. These trends have led to increased uncertainty in the level and cost of debt for commercial properties, and in turn has injected some volatility into commercial real estate markets.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
On January 7, 2015, we broke escrow in our initial public offering. We are dependent upon the net proceeds from our ongoing initial public offering to conduct our proposed operations. We expect to obtain the capital required to purchase and originate real estate and real estate-related investments and conduct our operations from the proceeds of our offering, from secured or unsecured financings from banks and other lenders and from any undistributed funds from our operations. As of September 30, 2016, we had sold 12,219,724 shares of common stock for gross offering proceeds of $119.4 million in our initial public offering. Additionally, we sold 3,619,851 shares of common stock in our private offering for gross offering proceeds of $32.2 million.
Regulatory developments related to the reporting of our estimated value per share under recently effective FINRA and NASD Conduct Rules, and changes to the definition of fiduciary under ERISA and Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) may significantly affect our ability to raise substantial additional funds in the public offering.  See Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors” herein. If we are unable to raise substantially more funds in our initial public offering, we will make fewer investments resulting in less diversification in terms of the type, number and size of investments we make and the value of an investment in us will fluctuate with the performance of the specific assets we acquire. Further, we will have certain fixed operating expenses, including certain expenses as a REIT, regardless of whether we are able to raise substantial funds in the initial public offering. Our inability to raise substantial funds would increase our fixed operating expenses as a percentage of gross income, reducing our net income and limiting our ability to make distributions.
Our hotel properties generate cash flow in the form of room, food, beverage and convention services, campground and other revenues, which are reduced by hotel expenses, capital expenditures, debt service payments, the payment of asset management fees and corporate general and administrative expenses. Cash flow from operations from our hotel properties are primarily dependent upon the occupancy levels of our hotels, the average daily rates and how well we manage our expenditures. The following table provides summary information regarding our hotel properties as of September 30, 2016:
Property
 
Number of Rooms
 
Percentage Occupied for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
 
Average Revenue per Available Room
 
Average Daily Rate
Springmaid Beach Resort (1)
 
452
 
81.9%
 
$99.33
 
$121.30
Q&C Hotel
 
196
 
55.7%
 
$89.88
 
$161.50
_____________________
(1) In November 2015, Springmaid Beach Resort took 238 rooms of the 452 rooms available offline to complete the renovation of a building. The 238 rooms were excluded from the percentage occupied and average revenue per available room for the period they were offline. In January 2016, the 238 rooms were put back into service and the remaining 214 rooms were taken offline to complete renovations. In May 2016, these 214 rooms were put back into service. Rooms not in service were excluded from the percentage occupied and average revenue per available room for the period they were offline.
Our office properties generate cash flow in the form of rental revenues and tenant reimbursements, which are reduced by operating expenditures, capital expenditures, debt service payments, the payment of asset management fees and corporate general and administrative expenses. Cash flow from operations from office properties is primarily dependent upon the occupancy level of our properties, the net effective rental rates on our leases, the collectibility of rent and operating recoveries from our tenants and how well we manage our expenditures. As of September 30, 2016, we owned two office properties that were 88% occupied.
Our real estate-related investment generates cash flow in the form of interest income, which is reduced by the payment of asset management fees and corporate general and administrative expenses. Cash flow from operations from our real estate-related investment is primarily dependent on the operating performance of the underlying collateral and the borrower’s ability to make its debt service payments. As of September 30, 2016, the borrower under our real estate loan receivable was current on all contractual debt service payments to us.

34

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

As of September 30, 2016, we had mortgage debt obligations in the aggregate principal amount of $107.3 million, with a weighted-average remaining term of 2.2 years. As of September 30, 2016, $4.4 million was available under our mortgage loans for future disbursements to be used for renovation costs and tenant improvement costs, subject to certain terms and conditions contained in the loan documents.
In addition to making investments in accordance with our investment objectives, we expect to use our capital resources to make certain payments to our advisor and the dealer manager. During our organization and offering stage, these payments will include payments to the dealer manager for selling commissions, the dealer manager fee and the stockholder servicing fee and payments to the dealer manager and our advisor for reimbursement of certain commercially reasonable organization and offering expenses, provided that no reimbursements made by us to our advisor or dealer manager may cause total organization and offering expenses incurred by us (including selling commissions, dealer manager fees and all other items of organization and offering expenses) to exceed 15% of the aggregate gross proceeds from our public offering as of the date of reimbursement. As of September 30, 2016, our advisor has incurred organization and offering expenses on our behalf related to our initial public offering of approximately $7.7 million. There was no limit on the organization and offering expenses we could incur in connection with our private offering. In addition, at the termination of the primary portion of our initial public offering, our advisor and our affiliates will reimburse us to the extent that the organization and other offering expenses (which exclude selling commissions, dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees) paid directly or reimbursed by us in connection with the primary portion of our initial public offering, regardless of when incurred, exceed 1.0% of gross offering proceeds from the primary portion of our initial public offering. The Advisor and its affiliates will be responsible for any organization and other offering expenses related to the primary portion of our initial public offering to the extent they exceed 1.0% of gross proceeds from the primary portion of the Public Offering as of the termination of the primary portion of our initial public offering. As of September 30, 2016, our advisor had incurred offering expenses on our behalf related to our private offering of $1.0 million, all of which have been reimbursed from proceeds from our now terminated private offering. During our acquisition and development stage, we expect to make payments to our advisor in connection with the selection and origination or purchase of investments, the management of our assets and costs incurred by our advisor in providing services to us. Our currently effective advisory agreement expires August 12, 2017 but may be renewed for an unlimited number of successive one-year periods upon the mutual consent of KBS Capital Advisors and our conflicts committee.
Among the fees payable to our advisor is an asset management fee. We will pay our advisor a monthly fee equal to the lesser of one-twelfth of (i) 1.0% of the cost of our investments and (ii) 2.0% of the sum of the cost of our investments, less any debt secured by or attributable to the investments. The cost of the real property investments will be calculated as the amount paid or allocated to acquire the real property, including the cost of any subsequent development, construction or improvements to the property and including fees and expenses related thereto (but excluding acquisition fees paid or payable our advisor). The cost of the loans and any investments other than real property will be calculated as the lesser of (x) the amount actually paid or allocated to acquire or fund the loan or other investment, including fees and expenses related thereto (but excluding acquisition fees paid or payable to our advisor) and (y) the outstanding principal amount of such loan or other investment, including fees and expenses related to the acquisition or funding of such investment (but excluding acquisition fees paid or payable to our advisor) as of the time of calculation. In the case of investments made through joint ventures, the asset management fee will be determined based on our proportionate share of the underlying investment.
In addition, an affiliate of our advisor, KBS Management Group, was recently formed to provide property management services with respect to certain properties owned by KBS-advised companies.  In the future, we may engage KBS Management Group with respect to one or more of our properties to provide property management services.  With respect to any such properties, we would expect to pay KBS Management Group a monthly fee equal to a percentage of the rent (to be determined on a property by property basis, consistent with current market rates).
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT and operate as a REIT. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we will be required to make aggregate annual distributions to our stockholders of at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding net capital gain). Our board of directors may authorize distributions in excess of those required for us to maintain REIT status depending on our financial condition and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant. We have not established a minimum distribution level.
Under our charter, we are required to limit our total operating expenses to the greater of 2% of our average invested assets or 25% of our net income for the four most recently completed fiscal quarters, as these terms are defined in our charter, unless the conflicts committee has determined that such excess expenses were justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors. Operating expense reimbursements for the four fiscal quarters ended September 30, 2016 exceeded the charter imposed limitation; however, the conflicts committee determined that the relationship of our operating expenses to our average invested assets was justified for these periods given the costs of operating a public company and the early stage of our operations.

35

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Cash Flows from Operating Activities
We commenced operations on September 4, 2014 in connection with our first investment. As of September 30, 2016, we owned two hotel properties, two office properties, one first mortgage loan and an investment in an unconsolidated entity. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, net cash provided by operating activities was $2.6 million, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $2.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. We expect that our cash flows from operating activities will generally increase in future periods as a result of anticipated future acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related investments and the related operations of such real estate investments.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $71.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and primarily consisted of the following:
$51.3 million for the acquisition of one office property;
$14.3 million of improvements to real estate;
$3.0 million escrow deposits for the acquisition of the Lofts at NoHo Commons; and
$2.5 million for an investment in an unconsolidated entity.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $110.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and primarily consisted of the following:
$65.4 million of net cash provided by offering proceeds related to our ongoing initial public offering, net of payments of commissions, dealer manager fees, stockholder servicing fees and other organization and offering costs of $4.3 million;
$45.0 million of net cash provided by debt financing as a result of proceeds from notes payable of $45.5 million, partially offset by payments of deferred financing costs of $0.5 million;
$0.5 million of noncontrolling interest contributions; and
$0.4 million of net cash distributions, after giving effect to distributions reinvested by stockholders of $0.7 million.
In order to execute our investment strategy, we utilize secured debt and we may, to the extent available, utilize unsecured debt, to finance a portion of our investment portfolio. Management remains vigilant in monitoring the risks inherent with the use of debt in our portfolio and is taking actions to ensure that these risks, including refinancing and interest risks, are properly balanced with the benefit of using leverage. Once we have fully invested the proceeds of our initial public offering, we expect our debt financing will be 60% or less of the cost of our tangible assets (before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves). There is no limitation on the amount we may borrow for any single investment. Our charter limits our total liabilities such that our total liabilities may not exceed 75% of the cost of our tangible assets (before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves); however, we may exceed that limit if a majority of the Conflicts Committee approves each borrowing in excess of our charter limitation and we disclose such borrowing to our common stockholders in our next quarterly report with an explanation from the conflicts committee of the justification for the excess borrowing. As of September 30, 2016, our borrowings and other liabilities were approximately 47% of the cost (before depreciation or other noncash reserves) and book value (before depreciation) of our tangible assets.

36

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Contractual Commitments and Contingencies
The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2016 (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
Payments Due During the Years Ending December 31,
Contractual Obligations
 
Total
 
Remainder of 2016
 
2017-2018
 
2019-2020
 
Thereafter
Outstanding debt obligations (1)
 
$
107,260

 
$

 
$
73,760

 
$
33,500

 
$

Interest payments on outstanding debt obligations (2)
 
6,743

 
820

 
4,839

 
1,084

 

Stockholder servicing fee liability (3)
 
1,474

 
121

 
752

 
601

 

_____________________
(1) Amounts include principal payments only.
(2) Projected interest payments are based on the outstanding principal amounts, maturity dates and interest rates in effect at September 30, 2016. We incurred interest expense of $2.1 million, excluding amortization of deferred financing costs of $0.4 million and unrealized loss on interest rate cap of $43,000 and including interest capitalized of $126,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
(3) Stockholder servicing fee is an annual fee of 1.0% of the purchase price per Class T share sold in our primary public offering for services rendered to Class T stockholders by the broker dealer of record after the initial sale of the Class T share. The stockholder servicing fee will accrue daily and be paid monthly in arrears for up to the fourth anniversary of the issuance of the Class T share.
Results of Operations
Overview
As of September 30, 2015, we had originated one first mortgage loan and acquired one hotel property. As of September 30, 2016, we owned two hotel properties, two office properties, one first mortgage loan and an investment in an unconsolidated entity. We funded the acquisitions of these investments with proceeds from our terminated private offering, initial public offering and debt financing. Our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 are not indicative of those in future periods as we commenced operations on September 4, 2014 in connection with our first investment and expect to make future acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related investments. In general, we expect that our revenue and expenses related to our portfolio will increase in future periods as a result of anticipated future acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related investments.
Comparison of the three months ended September 30, 2016 versus the three months ended September 30, 2015
The following table provides summary information about our results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Increase
 
Percentage Change
 
$ Change Due to Acquisitions (1)
 
$ Change Due to 
Investments Held Throughout
Both Periods (2)
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
Hotel revenues
 
$
8,599

 
$
7,222

 
$
1,377

 
19
%
 
$
1,416

 
$
(39
)
Office revenue
 
1,892

 

 
1,892

 
n/a

 
1,892

 

Interest income from real estate loan receivable
 
101

 
99

 
2

 
2
%
 

 
2

Hotel expenses
 
5,157

 
3,689

 
1,468

 
40
%
 
1,328

 
140

Office expenses
 
521

 

 
521

 
n/a

 
521

 

Asset management fees to affiliate
 
359

 
89

 
270

 
303
%
 
234

 
36

General and administrative expenses
 
694

 
616

 
78

 
13
%
 
n/a

 
n/a

Depreciation and amortization
 
2,314

 
185

 
2,129

 
1,151
%
 
1,715

 
414

Interest expense
 
931

 
290

 
641

 
221
%
 
599

 
42

_____________________
(1) Represents the dollar amount increase (decrease) for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2015 related to real estate acquired on or after July 1, 2015.
(2) Represents the dollar amount increase (decrease) for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2015 with respect to real estate and real estate-related investments owned by us during the entire periods presented.

37

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Hotel revenues increased from $7.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 to $8.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 as a result of the acquisition of Q&C Hotel in December 2015. We expect hotel revenues to increase in future periods as a result of the ongoing improvements in connection with the re-branding strategy of our hotel properties. Office revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was $1.9 million. We expect office revenue to increase in future periods as a result of anticipated future acquisitions of real estate properties.
Interest income from our real estate loan receivable, recognized using the interest method, remained consistent at $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2016.
Hotel expenses increased from $3.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 to $5.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 as a result of the acquisition of Q&C Hotel. Office expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2016 were $0.5 million. We expect total expenses to increase in future periods as a result of anticipated future acquisitions of real estate properties.
Asset management fees to affiliate increased from $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 to $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to the growth of our real estate portfolio. We expect asset management fees to increase in future periods as a result of anticipated future acquisitions of real estate properties. All asset management fees incurred as of September 30, 2016 have been paid.
General and administrative expenses increased from $0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 to $0.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to the growth of our real estate portfolio. We expect general and administrative costs to increase in future periods as we acquire additional investments but to decrease as a percentage of total revenue.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased from $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 to $2.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to the growth of our real estate portfolio. We expect depreciation and amortization expenses to increase in future periods as a result of anticipated future acquisitions of real estate properties.
Interest expense increased from $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 to $0.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to increased borrowings in connection with our acquisition activity. Our interest expense in future periods will vary based on our level of future borrowings, which will depend on the amount of proceeds raised in our ongoing initial public offering, the availability and cost of debt financing, and the opportunity to acquire real estate and real estate-related investments meeting our investment objectives.
Comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2016 versus the nine months ended September 30, 2015
The following table provides summary information about our results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
Increase
 
Percentage Change
 
$ Change Due to Acquisitions (1)
 
$ Change Due to 
Investments Held Throughout
Both Periods (2)
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
 
Hotel revenues
 
$
20,563

 
$
14,119

 
$
6,444

 
46
%
 
$
5,671

 
$
773

Office revenue
 
3,289

 

 
3,289

 
n/a

 
3,289

 

Interest income from real estate loan receivable
 
298

 
291

 
7

 
2
%
 

 
7

Hotel expenses
 
13,466

 
9,105

 
4,361

 
48
%
 
3,857

 
504

Office expenses
 
860

 

 
860

 
n/a

 
860

 

Asset management fees to affiliate
 
908

 
257

 
651

 
253
%
 
551

 
100

Real estate acquisition fees to affiliate
 
1,341

 

 
1,341

 
n/a

 
1,341

 

Real estate acquisition fees and expenses
 
123

 

 
123

 
n/a

 
123

 

General and administrative expenses
 
2,106

 
1,560

 
546

 
35
%
 
n/a

 
n/a

Depreciation and amortization
 
5,299

 
550

 
4,749

 
863
%
 
3,757

 
992

Interest expense
 
2,379

 
869

 
1,510

 
174
%
 
1,477

 
33

_____________________
(1) Represents the dollar amount increase (decrease) for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015 related to real estate acquired on or after January 1, 2015.
(2) Represents the dollar amount increase (decrease) for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015 with respect to real estate and real estate-related investments owned by us during the entire periods presented.

38

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Hotel revenues increased from $14.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 to $20.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as a result of the acquisition of Q&C Hotel in December 2015 and increases in occupancy and average daily rate with respect to the Springmaid Beach Resort. We expect hotel revenues to increase in future periods as a result of the ongoing improvements in connection with the re-branding strategy of our hotel properties. Office revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $3.3 million. We expect office revenue to increase in future periods as a result of holding the assets acquired in 2016 for an entire period and anticipated future acquisitions of real estate properties.
Interest income from our real estate loan receivable, recognized using the interest method, remained consistent at $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2016.
Hotel expenses increased from $9.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 to $13.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as a result of the acquisition of Q&C Hotel and an increase in occupancy with respect to the Springmaid Beach Resort. Office expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 were $0.9 million. We expect total expenses to increase in future periods as a result of anticipated future acquisitions of real estate properties.
Asset management fees to affiliate increased from $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 to $0.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to the growth of our real estate portfolio. We expect asset management fees to increase in future periods as a result of holding the assets acquired in 2016 for an entire period and anticipated future acquisitions of real estate properties. All asset management fees incurred as of September 30, 2016 have been paid.
Real estate acquisition fees and expenses to affiliate and non-affiliates were $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. We acquired one real estate property for $51.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we did not acquire any real estate properties. We expect real estate acquisition fees and expenses to vary in future periods based upon acquisition activity.
General and administrative expenses increased from $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 to $2.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to the growth of our real estate portfolio. We expect general and administrative costs to increase in future periods as we acquire additional investments but to decrease as a percentage of total revenue.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased from $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 to $5.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to the growth of our real estate portfolio. We expect depreciation and amortization expenses to increase in future periods as a result of holding the assets acquired in 2016 for an entire period and anticipated future acquisitions of real estate properties.
Interest expense increased from $0.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 to $2.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to increased borrowings in connection with our acquisition activity. Our interest expense in future periods will vary based on our level of future borrowings, which will depend on the amount of proceeds raised in our ongoing initial public offering, the availability and cost of debt financing, and the opportunity to acquire real estate and real estate-related investments meeting our investment objectives.
Funds from Operations, Modified Funds from Operations and Adjusted Modified Funds from Operations
We believe that funds from operations (“FFO”) is a beneficial indicator of the performance of an equity REIT. We compute FFO in accordance with the current National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) definition. FFO represents net income, excluding gains and losses from sales of operating real estate assets (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar conditions based on historical cost accounting and useful-life estimates), impairment losses on real estate assets, depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. We believe FFO facilitates comparisons of operating performance between periods and among other REITs. However, our computation of FFO may not be comparable to other REITs that do not define FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do. Our management believes that historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. As a result, we believe that the use of FFO, together with the required GAAP presentations, provides a more complete understanding of our performance relative to our competitors and provides a more informed and appropriate basis on which to make decisions involving operating, financing, and investing activities.

39

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Changes in accounting rules have resulted in a substantial increase in the number of non-operating and non-cash items included in the calculation of FFO. Items such as acquisition fees and expenses, which had previously been capitalized prior to 2009, are currently expensed and accounted for as operating expenses. As a result, our management also uses modified funds from operations (“MFFO”) as an indicator of our ongoing performance as well as our dividend sustainability. MFFO excludes from FFO: acquisition fees and expenses; adjustments related to contingent purchase price obligations; amounts relating to straight-line rents and amortization of above- and below-market intangible lease assets and liabilities; accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments; amortization of closing costs relating to debt investments; impairments of real estate-related investments; mark-to-market adjustments included in net income; and gains or losses included in net income for the extinguishment or sale of debt or hedges. We compute MFFO in accordance with the definition of MFFO included in the practice guideline issued by the Investment Program Association (“IPA”) in November 2010 as interpreted by management. Our computation of MFFO may not be comparable to other REITs that do not compute MFFO in accordance with the current IPA definition or that interpret the current IPA definition differently than we do.
In addition, our management uses an adjusted MFFO (“Adjusted MFFO”) as an indicator of our ongoing performance as well as our dividend sustainability. Adjusted MFFO provides adjustments to reduce MFFO related to operating expenses that are capitalized with respect to certain of our investments in undeveloped land. 
We believe that MFFO and Adjusted MFFO are helpful as measures of ongoing operating performance because they exclude costs that management considers more reflective of investing activities and other non-operating items included in FFO.  Management believes that excluding acquisition costs from MFFO and Adjusted MFFO provides investors with supplemental performance information that is consistent with management’s analysis of the operating performance of the portfolio over time, including periods after our acquisition stage.  MFFO and Adjusted MFFO also exclude non-cash items such as straight-line rental revenue.  Additionally, we believe that MFFO and Adjusted MFFO provide investors with supplemental performance information that is consistent with the performance indicators and analysis used by management, in addition to net income and cash flows from operating activities as defined by GAAP, to evaluate the sustainability of our operating performance.  MFFO provides comparability in evaluating the operating performance of our portfolio with other non-traded REITs which typically have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies.  MFFO, or an equivalent measure, is routinely reported by non-traded REITs, and we believe often used by analysts and investors for comparison purposes.
FFO, MFFO and Adjusted MFFO are non-GAAP financial measures and do not represent net income as defined by GAAP. Net income as defined by GAAP is the most relevant measure in determining our operating performance because FFO, MFFO and Adjusted MFFO include adjustments that investors may deem subjective, such as adding back expenses such as depreciation and amortization and the other items described above. Accordingly, FFO, MFFO and Adjusted MFFO should not be considered as alternatives to net income as an indicator of our current and historical operating performance. In addition, FFO, MFFO and Adjusted MFFO do not represent cash flows from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered an indication of our liquidity. We believe FFO, MFFO and Adjusted MFFO, in addition to net income and cash flows from operating activities as defined by GAAP, are meaningful supplemental performance measures.

40

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Although MFFO includes other adjustments, the exclusion of straight-line rent amortization of above- and below-market leases and acquisition fees and expenses, are the most significant adjustments for the periods presented.  We have excluded these items based on the following economic considerations:
Adjustments for straight-line rent.  These are adjustments to rental revenue as required by GAAP to recognize contractual lease payments on a straight-line basis over the life of the respective lease.  We have excluded these adjustments in our calculation of MFFO to more appropriately reflect the current economic impact of our in-place leases, while also providing investors with a useful supplemental metric that addresses core operating performance by removing rent we expect to receive in a future period or rent that was received in a prior period;
Amortization of above- and below-market leases.  Similar to depreciation and amortization of real estate assets and lease related costs that are excluded from FFO, GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of intangible lease assets and liabilities diminishes predictably over time and requires that these charges be recognized currently in revenue.  Since market lease rates in the aggregate have historically risen or fallen with local market conditions, management believes that by excluding these charges, MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the realized economics of the real estate; and
Acquisition fees and expenses. Acquisition fees and expenses related to the acquisition of real estate are expensed. Although these amounts reduce net income, we exclude them from MFFO to more appropriately present the ongoing operating performance of our real estate investments on a comparative basis. Additionally, acquisition costs have been funded from the proceeds from our private and public offerings as well as from debt financings, and not from our operations. We believe this exclusion is useful to investors as it allows investors to more accurately evaluate the sustainability of our operating performance.
Adjusted MFFO includes adjustments to reduce MFFO related to real estate taxes, property insurance and financing costs which are capitalized with respect to certain renovation projects.  We have included adjustments for the costs incurred necessary to bring these investments to their intended use, as these costs are recurring operating costs that are capitalized in accordance with GAAP and not reflected in our net income (loss), FFO and MFFO.   
Our calculation of FFO, which we believe is consistent with the calculation of FFO as defined by NAREIT, is presented in the following table, along with our calculations of MFFO and Adjusted MFFO, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands). No conclusions or comparisons should be made from the presentation of these periods.
 
For the Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
For the Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
$
601

 
$
2,170

 
$
(2,302
)
 
$
1,759

Depreciation of real estate assets
1,407

 
146

 
3,642

 
433

Amortization of lease-related costs
907

 
39

 
1,657

 
117

Adjustments for noncontrolling interests (1)
(119
)
 
(19
)
 
(334
)
 
(55
)
Adjustments for investment in unconsolidated entity (2)
29

 

 
29

 

FFO attributable to common stockholders 
2,825

 
2,336

 
2,692

 
2,254

Straight-line rent and amortization of above- and below-market leases
(283
)
 

 
(457
)
 

Amortization of discounts and closing costs
(18
)
 
(16
)
 
(52
)
 
(46
)
Real estate acquisition fees to affiliate

 

 
1,341

 

Real estate acquisition fees and expenses

 

 
123

 

MFFO attributable to common stockholders
2,524

 
2,320

 
3,647

 
2,208

Other capitalized operating expenses (2)
(57
)
 

 
(150
)
 

Adjustments for noncontrolling interests - consolidated entity (1)
6

 

 
15

 

Adjusted MFFO attributable to common stockholders
$
2,473

 
$
2,320

 
$
3,512

 
$
2,208

_____________________
(1) Reflects adjustments to eliminate the noncontrolling interest holders’ share of the adjustments to convert our net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders to FFO, MFFO and Adjusted MFFO.
(2) Reflects adjustments to add back our noncontrolling interest share of the adjustments to convert our net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders to FFO for our equity investment in an unconsolidated entity.
(2) Reflects real estate taxes, property insurance and financing costs that are capitalized with respect to certain renovation projects. During the time in which we are incurring costs necessary to bring these investments to their intended use, certain normal recurring operating costs are capitalized in accordance with GAAP and not reflected in our net income (loss), FFO and MFFO.

41

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

FFO, MFFO and Adjusted MFFO may also be used to fund all or a portion of certain capitalizable items that are excluded from FFO, MFFO and Adjusted MFFO, such as tenant improvements, building improvements and deferred leasing costs. We expect FFO, MFFO and Adjusted MFFO to improve in future periods to the extent that we continue to lease up vacant space and acquire additional assets. We expect FFO, MFFO and Adjusted MFFO to decrease as a result of dispositions.
Organization and Offering Costs
Our organization and offering costs (other than selling commissions, dealer manager fees and the stockholder servicing fee) may be paid by our advisor, the dealer manager or their affiliates on our behalf or may be paid directly by us. These offering costs include all expenses incurred in connection with our offerings. Organization costs include all expenses incurred in connection with our formation, including but not limited to legal fees and other costs to incorporate.
During our private offering, there was no limit on the amount of organization and offering costs we could incur. As of September 30, 2016, we had recorded $1.0 million of offering costs (other than selling commissions and dealer manager fees) related to our private offering, all of which were initially paid by our advisor or its affiliates on our behalf and subsequently reimbursed by us. 
During our initial public offering, pursuant to the advisory agreement and dealer manager agreement, we are obligated to reimburse our advisor, the dealer manager or their affiliates, as applicable, for organization and other offering costs paid by them on behalf of us, provided that no reimbursements made by us to our advisor or the dealer manager may cause total organization and offering expenses incurred by us (including selling commissions, dealer manager fees, the stockholder servicing fee to exceed 15% of the aggregate gross proceeds from our initial public offering as of the date of reimbursement. In addition, at the termination of the primary portion of our initial public offering, our advisor and our affiliates will reimburse us to the extent that the organization and other offering expenses (which exclude selling commissions, dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees) paid directly or reimbursed by us in connection with the primary portion of our initial public offering, regardless of when incurred, exceed 1.0% of gross offering proceeds from the primary portion of our initial public offering. The Advisor and its affiliates will be responsible for any organization and other offering expenses related to the primary portion of our initial public offering to the extent they exceed 1.0% of gross proceeds from the primary portion of the Public Offering as of the termination of the primary portion of our initial public offering.
Through September 30, 2016, the Advisor and its affiliates had incurred organization and other offering costs on our behalf in connection with the Public Offering of approximately $7.7 million. As of September 30, 2016, we had paid $8.3 million in selling commissions and dealer manager fees and accrued $1.5 million of stockholder servicing fees. As of December 31, 2015, we had paid or accrued $3.3 million of other organization and offering expenses. Subsequent to December 31, 2015, we reversed $2.2 million of accrued organization and offering expenses due to affiliates as a result of an amendment to the advisory agreement, which limits other offering costs to 1.0% of gross proceeds from the primary portion of our initial public offering as noted above. As of September 30, 2016, we had recorded $1.2 million of other organization and offering expenses, which amount represents our maximum liability for organization and offering costs as of September 30, 2016 based on the 1.0% limitation described above.
Distributions
To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must make aggregate annual distributions to our stockholders of at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which is computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction or net capital gain and which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP). If we meet the REIT qualification requirements, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on the income that we distribute to our stockholders each year. In general, we anticipate making distributions to our stockholders of at least 100% of our REIT taxable income so that none of our income is subject to federal income tax. Our board of directors may authorize distributions in excess of those required for us to maintain REIT status depending on our financial condition and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant.

42

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Until we have fully invested the proceeds of our public offering, and from time to time during our operational stage, we may not pay distributions solely from our cash flow from operating activities, in which case distributions may be paid in whole or in part from debt financing. Distributions declared, distributions paid and cash flow used in operations were as follows for the first, second and third quarters of 2016 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 
 
Distributions Declared (1)
 
Distributions Declared Per
Class A Share(1) (2)
 
Distributions Declared Per
Class T Share(1) (2)
 
Distributions Paid (3)
 
Cash  Flows (Used in)/Provided by Operations
Period
 
 
 
 
Cash
 
Reinvested
 
Total
 
First Quarter 2016
 
$
93

 
$
0.008

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(939
)
Second Quarter 2016
 
570

 
0.048

 
0.024

 
183

 
286

 
469

 
1,941

Third Quarter 2016
 
1,513

 
0.098

 
0.074

 
251

 
378

 
629

 
1,627

 
 
$
2,176


$
0.154


$
0.098


$
434


$
664


$
1,098


$
2,629

_____________________
(1) Distributions for the period from March 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016 were based on daily record dates and were calculated at a rate of $0.00026202 per share per day less the applicable daily stockholder servicing fee. Distributions for the period from April 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016 were based on daily record dates and were calculated at a rate of $0.00052404 per share per day less the applicable daily stockholder servicing fee. On September 27, 2016, our board of directors declared a one-time cash distribution in the amount of $0.05 per share on the outstanding shares of all classes of our common stock to stockholders of record as of the close of business on September 27, 2016, which we paid on October 5, 2016.
(2) Assumes Class A share was issued and outstanding each day that was a record date for distributions during the period presented. Assumes Class T share was issued and outstanding from March 2, 2016 through September 30, 2016. Given the distribution rate declared for the period and the applicable daily stockholder servicing fee for Class T shares of common stock, the Company did not pay cash distributions on shares of Class T common stock for record dates from March 2, 2016 to March 31, 2016. Distributions declared per Class T share for the second and third quarter of 2016 are shown assuming the stockholder servicing fee is applicable to all outstanding Class T shares.
(3) Distributions are paid on a monthly basis. Distributions for all record dates of a given month are paid on or about the first business day of the following month.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we paid aggregate distributions of $1.1 million, including $0.4 million distributions paid in cash and $0.7 million of distributions reinvested through our dividend reinvestment plan. Our net loss attributable to common stockholders for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $2.3 million and cash flow provided by operations was $2.6 million.
From inception through September 30, 2016, we paid cumulative distributions of $2.1 million and our cumulative net loss during the same period was $6.9 million. To the extent that we pay distributions from sources other than our cash flow from operating activities, we will have less funds available for the acquisition of real estate investments, the overall return to our stockholders may be reduced and subsequent investors will experience dilution.
We currently expect our board of directors to authorize and declare cash distributions based on daily record dates and pay these distributions on a monthly basis. We expect that we will fund these cash distributions from interest income on our debt investments, rental and other income on our real property investments and to the extent we acquire investments with short maturities or investments that are close to maturity, we may fund distributions with the proceeds received at the maturity, payoff or settlement of those investments. We may also utilize strategic refinancings to fund cash distributions for investments that have appreciated in value after our acquisition. Generally, our distribution policy is not to pay cash distributions from sources other than cash flow from operations, investment activities and strategic financings. However, we may fund cash distributions from any source and there are no limits to the amount of distributions that we may pay from any source, including proceeds from our public offering or the proceeds from the issuance of securities in the future, other third party borrowings, advances from our advisor or sponsors or from our advisor’s deferral of its fees under the advisory agreement. Distributions paid from sources other than current or accumulated earnings and profits may constitute a return of capital. From time to time, we may generate taxable income greater than our taxable income for financial reporting purposes, or our taxable income may be greater than our cash flow available for distribution to stockholders. In these situations we may make distributions in excess of our cash flow from operations, investment activities and strategic financings to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement. In such an event, we would look first to other third party borrowings to fund these distributions.

43

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

During our offering stage, we currently expect our board of directors to declare stock dividends on a set quarterly basis based on quarterly record dates. Especially during the early stages of our operations and until our cash flows stabilize, our board of directors believes the declaration of stock dividends is in our best interest because it will allow us to focus on our investment strategy of investing in opportunistic real estate investments that may generate limited cash flow but have the potential for appreciation. These stock dividends may reflect in part an increase or anticipated increase in portfolio value to the extent our board of directors believes assets in our portfolio have appreciated or will appreciate in value after acquisition or after we have taken control of the assets. In addition, these stock dividends may reflect in part cash flow from operations. However, we can provide no assurances that our stock dividends will reflect appreciation in our portfolio or cash flow from operations. Unless our assets appreciate in an amount sufficient to offset the dilutive effect of any stock dividends, the return per share for later investors purchasing our stock will be below the return per share of earlier investors. With respect to any non-performing assets that we acquire, we believe that within a relatively short time after acquisition or taking control of such investments via foreclosure or deed-in-lieu proceedings, we will often experience an increase in their value. For example, in most instances, we bring financial stability to the property, which reduces uncertainty in the market and alleviates concerns regarding the property’s management, ownership and future. We also may have more capital available for investment in these properties than their prior owners and operators were willing to invest, and as such, we are able to invest in tenant improvements and capital expenditures with respect to such properties, which enables us to attract substantially increased interest from brokers and tenants.
Our board of directors declared or issued the following stock dividends on shares of our common stock during the nine months ended September 30, 2016:
Declaration Date
 
Record Date
 
Issue Date
 
Amount Declared per
Share Outstanding
 
Total Shares Issued
March 21, 2016
 
March 31, 2016
 
April 1, 2016
 
0.005 shares
 
57,172
March 21, 2016
 
April 30, 2016
 
May 3, 2016
 
0.001667 shares
 
19,781
March 21, 2016
 
May 31, 2016
 
June 1, 2016
 
0.001667 shares
 
20,257
May 10, 2016
 
June 30, 2016
 
July 1, 2016
 
0.001667 shares
 
21,900
May 10, 2016
 
July 31, 2016
 
August 1, 2016
 
0.001667 shares
 
23,719
July 6, 2016
 
August 31, 2016
 
September 1, 2016
 
0.001667 shares
 
26,037
August 11, 2016
 
September 30, 2016
 
October 4, 2016
 
0.001667 shares
 
28,420
August 11, 2016
 
October 31, 2016
 
November 2, 2016
 
0.001667 shares
 
30,341
September 27, 2016
 
September 27, 2016
 
October 6, 2016
 
0.015 shares
 
254,287
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the SEC. The preparation of our financial statements requires significant management judgments, assumptions and estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and our disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. With different estimates or assumptions, materially different amounts could be reported in our financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different estimates that may impact the comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses. A discussion of the accounting policies that management considers critical in that they involve significant management judgments, assumptions and estimates is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed with the SEC. There have been no significant changes to our policies during 2016.

44

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Subsequent Events
We evaluate subsequent events up until the date the consolidated financial statements are issued.
Status of the Offering
We commenced our initial public offering on August 12, 2014 and broke escrow on January 7, 2015. As of November 4, 2016, we had sold 8,644,798 and 4,755,756 shares of Class A and Class T common stock in our initial public offering, respectively, for aggregate gross offering proceeds of $130.8 million. Included in these amounts were 195,574 and 22,876 shares of Class A and Class T common stock sold under our dividend reinvestment plan, respectively, for aggregate gross offering proceeds of $1.9 million.
Cash Distributions Paid
On October 3, 2016, we paid distributions of $0.2 million related to cash distributions on the outstanding shares of the common stock based on daily record dates for the period from September 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016. On November 1, 2016, we paid distributions of $0.3 million related to cash distributions on the outstanding shares of the common stock based on daily record dates for the period from October 1, 2016 through October 31, 2016. Distributions for these periods were calculated based on stockholders of record each day during these periods at a rate of (i) $0.00052404 per share per day less (ii) the applicable daily stockholder servicing fees accrued for and allocable to any class of common stock, divided by the number of shares of common stock of such class outstanding as of the close of business on each respective record date.
On October 5, 2016, we paid distributions of $0.8 million related to a one-time cash distribution in the amount of $0.05 per share on the outstanding shares of all classes of our common stock to stockholders of record as of the close of business on September 27, 2016.
Stock Dividends Issued
On August 11, 2016, our board of directors authorized stock dividends for the month of September 2016, in the amount of 0.001667 shares of each class of our common stock on each outstanding share of common stock issuable to all common stockholders of record as of the close of business on September 30, 2016. We issued the September 2016 stock dividend, consisting of 28,420 shares, on October 4, 2016.
Also, on August 11, 2016, our board of directors authorized stock dividends for the month of October 2016, in the amount of 0.001667 shares of each class of our common stock on each outstanding share of common stock issuable to all common stockholders of record as of the close of business on October 31, 2016. We issued the October 2016 stock dividend, consisting of 30,341 shares, on November 2, 2016.
On September 27, 2016, our board of directors authorized a one-time stock dividend in the amount of 0.015 shares of common stock to all common stockholders of record as of the close of business on September 27, 2016. We issued the one-time stock dividend, consisting of 254,287 shares, on October 6, 2016.
Distributions Declared
On October 11, 2016, our board of directors declared cash distributions on the outstanding shares of all classes of common stock based on daily record dates for the period from November 1, 2016 through November 30, 2016, which we expect to pay in December 2016. On November 10, 2016, our board of directors declared cash distributions on the outstanding shares of all classes of common stock based on daily record dates for the period from December 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and January 1, 2017 through January 31, 2017, which we expect to pay in January and February 2017, respectively. Distributions for the period from November 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 will be calculated based on stockholders of record each day during these periods at a rate of (i) $0.00052404 per share per day less (ii) the applicable daily stockholder servicing fees accrued for and allocable to any class of common stock, divided by the number of shares of common stock of such class outstanding as of the close of business on each respective record date. Distributions for the period from January 1, 2017 through January 31, 2017 will be calculated based on stockholders of record each day during these periods at a rate of (i) $0.00052548 per share per day less (ii) the applicable daily stockholder servicing fees accrued for and allocable to any class of common stock, divided by the number of shares of common stock of such class outstanding as of the close of business on each respective record date.

45

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Also on October 11, 2016, our board of directors authorized monthly stock dividends for the month of November 2016, in the amount of 0.001667 shares of each class of our common stock on each outstanding share of common stock issuable to all common stockholders of record as of the close of business on November 30, 2016, which we expect to issue in December 2016. Also on November 10, 2016, our board of directors authorized monthly stock dividends for the months of December 2016 and January 2017, each in the amount of 0.001667 shares of each class of our common stock on each outstanding share of common stock issuable to all common stockholders of record as of the close of business on December 31, 2016 and January 31, 2017, respectively, which we expect to issue in January 2017 and February 2017, respectively. Stock dividends are issued in the same class of shares as the shares for which such stockholder received the stock dividend.
Springmaid Beach Resort
In October 2016, Springmaid Beach Resort Hotel, which is located in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, sustained significant damage from Hurricane Matthew. We are in the process of assessing the extent of the property damage at Springmaid Beach Resort Hotel and quantify the financial impact to our financial statements.
Probable Real Estate Investment
210 West 31st Street
On October 28, 2016, we, through a indirect wholly owned subsidiary, entered into a joint venture (the “210 West 31st Street Joint Venture”) with Onyx 31st Street LLC (the “210 West 31st Street JV Partner”). A wholly owned subsidiary of the 210 West 31st Street Joint Venture then entered into a purchase and sale agreement with the 210 West 31st Street JV Partner whereby the 210 West 31st Street JV Partner would assign 80% of its interest in a ground lease in 210 West 31st Street, New York, New York (“210 West 31st Street”) to the wholly owned subsidiary of the 210 West 31st Street Joint Venture. The 210 West 31st Street JV Partner would retain a 20% interest in the ground lease in 210 West 31st Street and contribute this interest in exchange for a 20% interest in the 210 West 31st Street Joint Venture. The 210 West 31st Street JV Partner is not affiliated with us or our advisor.  The contractual purchase price of the 80% interest in the ground lease is $38.4 million plus closing costs and the remaining 20% interest has an attributable value of $9.6 million.
We own an 80% equity interest in the 210 West 31st Street Joint Venture and is responsible for funding the purchase of the 80% interest in the ground lease. Income, losses and distributions are generally allocated based on the members’ respective equity interests, subject to adjustments based on certain performance thresholds set forth in the joint venture agreement. Additionally, in certain circumstances described in the joint venture agreement, we and the 210 West 31st Street JV Partner may be required to make additional capital contributions to the joint venture, in proportion to the members’ respective equity interests.
The 210 West 31st Street Joint Venture intends to fund the acquisition of 210 West 31st Street with capital contributions from its members and with proceeds from a mortgage loan. The 210 West 31st Street Joint Venture is currently negotiating the terms of the mortgage loan.
Pursuant to the purchase and sale agreement, the 210 West 31st Street Joint Venture would be obligated to purchase the property only after satisfaction of agreed-upon closing conditions. There can be no assurance that the 210 West 31st Street Joint Venture will complete the acquisition. In some circumstances, if the 210 West 31st Street Joint Venture fails to complete the acquisition it may forfeit up to $3.0 million.
210 West 31st Street is located in New York, New York and consists of an 8,637 square foot development site located directly across the street from Madison Square Garden and Penn Station. 210 West 31st Street is currently a 23,110 square foot, 2-story building with basement. We intend to make significant renovations or improvements to 210 West 31st Street, including demolishing the existing structure and redeveloping the property into a 2-story retail building with a lower level and a rooftop deck and currently estimates these renovation and improvements to cost approximately $14.2 million.


46

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to the effects of interest rate changes as a result of borrowings used to maintain liquidity and to fund the financing of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. We are also exposed to the effects of changes in interest rates as a result of the origination of a mortgage loan. We are also exposed to the effects of foreign currency changes in the Euro with respect to our €2.1 million participating loan facility. Foreign currency exchange rate risk is the possibility that our financial results could be better or worse than planned because of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Our profitability and the value of our investment portfolio may be adversely affected during any period as a result of interest rate changes and foreign currency changes. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings, prepayment penalties and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs. We may manage interest rate risk by maintaining a ratio of fixed rate, long-term debt such that floating rate exposure is kept at an acceptable level. In addition, we may utilize a variety of financial instruments, including interest rate caps, floors, and swap agreements, in order to limit the effects of changes in interest rates on our operations. When we use these types of derivatives to hedge the risk of interest-earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities, we may be subject to certain risks, including the risk that losses on a hedge position will reduce the funds available for payments to holders of our common stock and that the losses may exceed the amount we invested in the instruments.
As of September 30, 2016, we owned one fixed-rate real estate loan receivable. Interest rate fluctuations will generally not affect our future earnings or cash flows on our fixed rate real estate loan receivable unless such instrument matures or is otherwise terminated. However, interest rate changes will affect the fair value of our fixed rate instrument. At September 30, 2016, the fair value and carrying value of our fixed rate real estate loan receivable was $3.4 million. The fair value estimate of our real estate loan receivable is estimated using an internal valuation model that considers the expected cash flows for the loan, underlying collateral value and the estimated yield requirements of institutional investors for loans with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term, loan-to-value, type of collateral and other credit enhancements. As we expect to hold our fixed rate instrument to maturity and the amounts due under such instrument would be limited to the outstanding principal balance and any accrued and unpaid interest, we do not expect that fluctuations in interest rates, and the resulting change in fair value of our fixed rate instrument, would have a significant impact on our operations.
Conversely, movements in interest rates on variable rate debt would change our future earnings and cash flows, but would not significantly affect the fair value of those instruments. However, changes in required risk premiums would result in changes in the fair value of floating rate instruments. As of September 30, 2016, we were exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on $107.3 million of variable rate debt outstanding. Based on interest rates as of September 30, 2016, if interest rates were 100 basis points higher during the 12 months ending September 30, 2017, interest expense on our variable rate debt would increase by $1.1 million. As of September 30, 2016, one-month LIBOR was 0.53111% and if the LIBOR index was reduced to 0% during the 12 months ending September 30, 2017, interest expense on our variable rate debt would decrease by $0.6 million.
The annual effective interest rate of our fixed rate real estate loan receivable as of September 30, 2016 was 11.7%. The effective interest rate represents the effective interest rate as of September 30, 2016, using the interest method, which we use to recognize interest income on our real estate loan receivable. The weighted-average interest rate of our variable rate debt as of September 30, 2016 was 3.1%.  The weighted-average interest rate represent the actual interest rate in effect as of September 30, 2016 (consisting of the contractual interest rate and the effect of interest rate caps, if applicable), using interest rate indices as of September 30, 2016 where applicable.
For a discussion of the interest rate risks related to the current capital and credit markets, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Market Outlook - Real Estate and Real Estate Finance Markets” herein, the risks discussed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC.


47

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon, and as of the date of, the evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

48

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following risk factor supplements the risks discussed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Based on sales volume to date, we expect to raise substantially less than the maximum offering amount in our ongoing public offering. Because we expect to raise substantially less than the maximum offering amount, we will not be able to invest in as diverse a portfolio of properties as we otherwise would, which will cause the value of our stockholders’ investment to vary more widely with the performance of specific assets, and cause our general and administrative expenses to constitute a greater percentage of our revenue. Raising fewer proceeds in our offering, therefore, increases the risk that our stockholders will lose money in their investment.
Our public offering is being made on a “best efforts” basis, whereby the brokers participating in the offering have no firm commitment or obligation to purchase any of the shares. To date, the proceeds we have raised in the offering are lower than our sponsor and dealer manager originally expected. Unless we file a registration statement with the SEC to conduct a follow-on public offering, we expect our public offering to terminate in August 2017.  As a result, we do not expect to raise the maximum offering amount in the public offering. Therefore, we will make fewer investments than originally intended resulting in less diversification in terms of the number of investments owned and the geographic regions in which our investments are located. Adverse developments with respect to a single property, or a geographic region, will have a greater adverse impact on our operations than they otherwise would. In addition, our inability to raise substantial funds will increase our fixed operating expenses as a percentage of our revenue, reducing our net income and limiting our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Regulatory developments related to how we report our estimated value per share under recently effective FINRA and NASD Conduct Rules and changes to the definition of “fiduciary” under ERISA and the Code, may significantly affect our ability to raise substantial additional funds in the public offering.
In April 2016, final regulations went into effect that require FINRA members and their associated persons that participate in our public offering to disclose a per share estimated value of our shares developed in a manner reasonably designed to ensure that the per share estimated value is reliable.  As a result, we report the net investment amount of our shares as our estimated value per share, which net investment amount is based on the “amount available for investment/net investment amount” percentage shown in our estimated use of proceeds table and is effectively the purchase price of our primary offering shares, less the associated selling commission, dealer manager fee, and estimated organization and other offering expenses as shown in our estimated use of proceeds table in the prospectus for the public offering.  Also in April 2016, the DOL issued a final regulation relating to the definition of a fiduciary under ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code. The final regulation broadens the definition of fiduciary and is accompanied by new and revised prohibited transaction exemptions relating to investments by employee benefit plans subject to Title I of ERISA or retirement plans or accounts subject to Section 4975 of the Code (including IRAs). The final regulation and the related exemptions will become applicable for investment transactions on and after April 10, 2017, but generally should not apply to purchases of our shares before that date. These regulatory developments may significantly affect our ability to raise substantial additional funds in the public offering.

49

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1A. Risk Factors (continued)

We have paid distributions in part from financings and expect that in the future we may not pay distributions solely from our cash flow from operating activities. To the extent that we pay distributions from sources other than our cash flow from operating activities, we will have less funds available for investment in properties and other assets, the overall return to our stockholders may be reduced and subsequent investors will experience dilution.
Our organizational documents permit us to pay distributions from any source, including offering proceeds or borrowings (which may constitute a return of capital), and our charter does not limit the amount of funds we may use from any source to pay such distributions. We have paid distributions in part from financings and expect that in the future we may not pay distributions solely from our cash flow from operating activities, in which case distributions may be paid in whole or in part from debt financing. We may also fund such distributions with proceeds from the sale of assets or from the maturity, payoff or settlement of debt investments. If we fund distributions from borrowings, our interest expense and other financing costs, as well as the repayment of such borrowings, will reduce our earnings and cash flow from operating activities available for distribution in future periods. If we fund distributions from the sale of assets or the maturity, payoff or settlement of debt investments, this will affect our ability to generate cash flow from operating activities in future periods. To the extent that we pay distributions from sources other than our cash flow from operating activities, we will have fewer funds available with which to make real estate investments, the overall return to our stockholders may be reduced and subsequent investors will experience dilution. In addition, to the extent distributions exceed cash flow from operating activities, a stockholder’s basis in our stock will be reduced and, to the extent distributions exceed a stockholder’s basis, the stockholder may recognize capital gain. There is no limit on the amount of distributions we may fund from sources other than from cash flow from operating activities.
During our public offering stage, when we may raise capital in this offering (and possibly future offerings) more quickly than we acquire income-producing assets, and from time to time during our operational stage, we may not pay distributions solely from our cash flow from operating activities.
For the year ended December 31, 2015, we paid aggregate distributions of $1.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2015, including $0.4 million of distributions paid in cash and $0.6 million of distributions reinvested in shares of our Class A common stock through our dividend reinvestment plan. Our net loss attributable to common stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $2.1 million. Cash flow provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $0.3 million. We funded our total distributions paid, which includes net cash distributions and dividends reinvested by stockholders, with $0.3 million of cash flow provided by operating activities and $0.7 million of debt financing.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we paid aggregate distributions of $1.1 million, including $0.4 million of distributions paid in cash and $0.7 million of distributions reinvested through our dividend reinvestment plan. Our net loss attributable to common stockholders for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $2.3 million and cash flow provided by operations was $2.6 million. We funded our total distributions paid, which includes net cash distributions and dividends reinvested by stockholders, with cash flow provided by operations.
From inception through September 30, 2016, we paid cumulative distributions of $2.1 million and our cumulative net loss during the same period was $6.9 million.



50

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

a)
During the period covered by this Form 10-Q, we did not sell any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
b)
On August 12, 2014, our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-192331), covering a public offering of up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock in a primary offering and 80,000,000 shares of common stock under our dividend reinvestment plan, was declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933. We commenced our initial public offering on August 12, 2014 upon retaining KBS Capital Markets Group LLC, an affiliate of our advisor, as the dealer manager of our offering. Initially, we were offering 100,000,000 shares of common stock in our primary offering at an aggregate offering price of up to $1.0 billion, or $10.00 per share with discounts available to certain categories of purchasers. The 80,000,000 shares offered under our dividend reinvestment plan were initially being offered at an aggregate offering price of $760 million, or $9.50 per share.
On February 11, 2016, we filed an amended registration statement on Form S-11 with the SEC to add a second class of common stock designated as Class T shares and to designate our currently outstanding common stock as Class A shares. Pursuant to the registration statement, as amended, effective February 17, 2016, we are offering up to $1,000,000,000 in shares of our common stock in the primary offering, consisting of two classes of shares: Class A shares at a price of $10.00 per share and Class T shares at a price of $9.59 per share. Both classes of shares have discounts available to certain categories of purchasers. We are also offering up to 76,366,006 in shares of our common stock pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan: Class A shares at a price of $9.50 per share and Class T shares at a price of $9.12 per share. We are offering to sell any combination of Class A and Class T shares in our primary offering and dividend reinvestment plan offering but in no event may we sell more than 180,000,000 of shares of our common stock pursuant to the offering. We reserve the right to reallocate shares between the primary offering and our dividend reinvestment plan offering. Based on our current estimates, we have allocated 103,633,994 and 76,366,006 shares of our common stock to our primary and dividend reinvestment plan offerings, respectively.
We expect to terminate our initial public offering approximately 90 days (as determined by our Chief Executive Officer) after we have announced that we have raised $650 million in our primary initial public offering.  In no event may the primary offering  continue beyond the time period permitted by the rules promulgated by the SEC, which rules provide that absent the filing of a registration statement for a follow-on offering, this primary offering shall terminate after a three-year period. We may sell shares under the dividend reinvestment plan beyond the termination of the primary offering until we have sold all the shares under the plan.
As of September 30, 2016, we had sold 12,219,724 shares of common stock in our ongoing initial public offering for gross offering proceeds of $119.4 million, including 132,339 shares of common stock under our dividend reinvestment plan for gross offering proceeds of $1.3 million. As of September 30, 2016, we had incurred selling commissions, dealer manager fees and organization and other offering costs in connection with our initial public offering in the amounts set forth below. We pay selling commissions and dealer manager fees to KBS Capital Markets Group, and KBS Capital Markets Group reallows all selling commissions and a portion of the dealer manager fees to participating broker-dealers. In addition, we reimburse KBS Capital Advisors and KBS Capital Markets Group for certain offering expenses as described in our prospectus, as amended and supplemented.
Type of Expense Amount
 
Amount
(in thousands)
 
Estimated/Actual
Selling commissions and dealer manager fees (1)
 
$
8,323

 
Actual
Organization and other offering costs (excluding selling commissions, dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees) (2)
 
1,247

 
Actual
Total expenses
 
$
9,570

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Percentage of offering proceeds used to pay or reimburse affiliates for expenses above
 
8.0
%
 
Actual
______________________________________________
(1) Except as described in the “Plan of Distribution” section of our prospectus, as amended and supplemented, an annual stockholder servicing fee of 1.0% of the purchase price per share (ignoring any discounts that may be available to certain categories of purchasers) for the Class T shares sold in the primary portion of our initial public offering will be paid to our dealer manager and will accrue daily and be paid monthly in arrears. Our dealer manager will reallow all of the stockholder servicing fees paid to it. The stockholder servicing fee is an ongoing fee that is not paid at the time of purchase and is not intended to be a principal use of offering proceeds; it is therefore not included in the table above. As of September 30, 2016, we had accrued approximately $1.5 million in stockholder servicing fees, which is the maximum amount of the stockholder servicing fee payable with respect to all Class T shares sold in the primary portion of our initial public offering as of September 30, 2016.
(2) Organization and other offering costs (which exclude selling commissions, dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees) are capped at 1.0% of gross offering proceeds from the primary portion of our initial public offering.  KBS Capital Advisors and its affiliates are responsible for any organization and other offering costs related to the primary portion of our initial public offering that exceed this limit.  The amount included above represents our maximum liability for organization and other offering costs based on the 1.0% limit.  As of September 30, 2016, KBS Capital Advisors and its affiliates had incurred an additional $6.5 million in organization and other offering costs on our behalf in connection with our initial public offering.

51

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds (continued)

We expect to use substantially all of the net proceeds from our initial public offering to invest in and manage a diverse portfolio of opportunistic real estate, real estate-related loans, real estate-related debt securities and other real estate-related investments located in the United States and Europe. Such investments will include the acquisition of distressed debt, the origination and acquisition of mortgage, mezzanine, bridge and other real estate-related loans, investment in opportunistic real estate and investments in real estate-related debt securities such as residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations. We may also invest in entities that make similar investments.
As of September 30, 2016, we had used the net proceeds from our now terminated private offering and our initial public offering and debt financing to invest $186.0 million in two hotel properties, two office properties, one first mortgage and an investment in an unconsolidated entity, including $5.4 million of acquisition fees and closing costs and origination fees and expenses.
c)
On July 3, 2013, our board of directors adopted a share redemption program that has been amended at various times thereafter and that may enable stockholders to sell their shares to us in limited circumstances. The terms of the share redemption program described below are the terms as are currently in effect.
Pursuant to the share redemption program there are several limitations on our ability to redeem shares:
Unless the shares are being redeemed in connection with a stockholder's death, “qualifying disability” or “determination of incompetence” (each as defined under the share redemption program), we may not redeem shares until the stockholder has held the shares for one year.
During each calendar year, the share redemption program limits the number of shares we may redeem to those that we could purchase with the amount of the net proceeds from the issuance of shares under the dividend reinvestment plan during the prior calendar year. We may, however, increase or decrease the funding available for the redemption of shares pursuant to the program upon ten business days’ notice to our stockholders.
During any calendar year, we may redeem no more than 5% of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the prior calendar year.
We have no obligation to redeem shares if the redemption would violate the restrictions on distributions under Maryland law, which prohibits distributions that would cause a corporation to fail to meet statutory tests of solvency.
Pursuant to the program, as amended, unless the shares are being redeemed in connection with a stockholder’s death, “qualifying disability,” or “determination of incompetence” (each as defined in the share redemption program), until we establish an estimated net asset value or NAV per share of our common stock, the price at which we will redeem the shares is as follows:
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least one year, 92.5% of the price paid to acquire the shares from us;
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least two years, 95.0% of the price paid to acquire the shares from us;
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least three years, 97.5% of the price paid to acquire the shares from us; and
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least four years, 100% of the price paid to acquire the shares from us.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, stock dividends will initially be redeemed at the “net investment amount” per share, which will be based on the “amount available for investment/net investment amount” percentage shown in our estimated use of proceeds table in our prospectus, as amended and supplemented. For each class of shares, this amount will initially equal $9.01 per share for redemptions of shares received as a result of a stock dividend.

52

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds (continued)

After we establish an estimated NAV per share of our common stock, and unless the shares are being redeemed in connection with a stockholder’s death, qualifying disability, or determination of incompetence, the price at which we will redeem the shares is as follows:
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least one year, 92.5% of our most recent estimated NAV per share as of the applicable redemption date;
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least two years, 95.0% of our most recent estimated NAV per share as of the applicable redemption date;
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least three years, 97.5% of our most recent estimated NAV per share as of the applicable redemption date; and
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least four years, 100% of our most recent estimated NAV per share as of the applicable redemption date.
For purposes of determining the time period a redeeming stockholder has held each share, the time period begins as of the date the stockholder acquired the share; provided, that shares purchased by the redeeming stockholder pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan and shares received as a stock dividend will be deemed to have been acquired on the same date as the initial share to which the dividend reinvestment plan shares or stock dividend shares relate. The date of the share’s original issuance by us is not determinative. In addition, as described above, the shares owned by a stockholder may be redeemed at different prices depending on how long the stockholder has held each share submitted for redemption.
We expect to establish an estimated NAV per share no later than 150 days after the second anniversary of the date on which we broke escrow in our initial public offering.
The terms of our share redemption program with respect to redemptions sought upon a stockholder’s death, qualifying disability or determination of incompetence are as follows:
There is no one-year holding requirement;
Additional funds in an amount up to $500,000 are available for redemption;
Until we establish an estimated NAV per share, which we expect to be no later than June 6, 2017 (as described above), the redemption price is the amount paid to acquire the shares from us; provided that, stock dividends will initially be redeemed at the “net investment amount” per share, which will be based on the “amount available for investment/net investment amount” percentage shown in our estimated use of proceeds table in our prospectus for our initial public offering, as amended and supplemented. For each class of shares, this amount will initially equal $9.01 per share for redemptions of shares received as a result of a stock dividend; and
Once we have established an estimated NAV per share, the redemption price would be the estimated NAV of the shares, as determined by our board of directors.
Upon a transfer of shares any pending redemption requests with respect to such transferred shares will be canceled as of the date we accept the transfer. Stockholders wishing to continue to have a redemption request related to any transferred shares considered by us must resubmit their redemption request.
Our board may amend, suspend or terminate the share redemption program upon 30 days’ notice to stockholders, provided that we may increase or decrease the funding available for the redemption of shares pursuant to the share redemption program upon 10 business days’ notice.

53

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds (continued)

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we fulfilled redemption requests and redeemed shares pursuant to the share redemption program as follows:
Month
 
Total Number
of Shares Redeemed 
 
Average Price Paid
Per Share (1)
 
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares Available That
May Yet Be Redeemed Under the Program
January 2016
 

 
$

 
(2) 
February 2016
 

 
$

 
(2) 
March 2016
 
534

 
$
8.64

 
(2) 
April 2016
 

 
$

 
(2) 
May 2016
 

 
$

 
(2) 
June 2016
 
1,583

 
$
9.17

 
(2) 
July 2016
 

 
$

 
(2) 
August 2016
 

 
$

 
(2) 
September 2016
 
2,257

 
$
9.15

 
(2) 
 
 
4,374

 
 
 
 
_____________________
(1) Pursuant to the program, as amended, we will initially redeem shares as follows:
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least one year, 92.5% of the price paid to acquire the shares from us;
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least two years, 95.0% of the price paid to acquire the shares from us;
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least three years, 97.5% of the price paid to acquire the shares from us; and
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least four years, 100% of the price paid to acquire the shares from us.
Notwithstanding the above, upon the death, “qualifying disability” or “determination of incompetence” of a stockholder, the redemption price will be the amount paid to acquire the shares from us. Furthermore, once we establish an estimated NAV per share of our common stock, the redemption price per share for all stockholders will be equal to the estimated value per share, as determined by our advisor or another firm chosen for that purpose. We expect to establish an estimated NAV per share no later than June 6, 2017.
(2) We limit the dollar value of shares that may be redeemed under the program as described above. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we redeemed $40,000 of common stock, which represented all redemption requests received in good order and eligible for redemption through the September 2016 redemption date. Based on the amount of net proceeds raised from the sale of shares under the dividend reinvestment plan during 2015 and the $0.5 million set aside for stockholder’s death, qualifying disability or determination of incompetence, we have $1.1 million available for redemptions during 2016, subject to the limitations described above.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.


54

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 6. Exhibits

Ex.
 
Description
 
 
 
 
3.1
 
Second Articles of Amendment and Restatement adopted on August 11, 2014, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2014, filed September 19, 2014
 
 
 
 
3.2
 
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws adopted August 6, 2015, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2015, filed August 11, 2015
 
 
 
 
3.3
 
Articles Supplementary for the Class T Shares of common stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Post-Effective Amendment no. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File no. 333-192331, dated February 16, 2016
 
 
 
 
3.4
 
Articles Supplementary for the Class A Shares of common stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to Post-Effective Amendment no. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File no. 333-192331, date February 16, 2016
 
 
 
 
3.5
 
Articles of Amendment, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to Post-Effective Amendment no. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File no. 333-192331, dated February 16, 2016
 
 
 
 
4.1
 
Form of Subscription Agreement, incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the prospectus filed in Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Post-Effective Amendment no. 6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File no. 333-192331, dated April 26, 2016
 
 
 
 
4.2
 
Statement regarding restrictions on transferability of shares of common stock (to appear on stock certificate or to be sent upon request and without charge to stockholders issued shares without certificates), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2014, filed September 19, 2014
 
 
 
 
4.3
 
Third Amended and Restated Dividend Reinvestment Plan adopted February 16, 2016, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed February 22, 2016
 
 
 
4.4
 
Escrow Agreement dated January 22, 2016, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Post-Effective Amendment no. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-192331, dated February 11, 2016
 
 
 
4.5
 
Multiple Class Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-192331, dated February 16, 2016
 
 
 
 
10.1
 
Advisory Agreement, by and between the Company and KBS Capital Advisors LLC, dated August 12, 2016
 
 
 
10.2
 
Limited Liability Company Agreement of KBS SOR II Lofts at Noho Commons, LLC by and between Noho Commons Pacific Investors LLC and KBS SOR II Lofts at Noho Commons JV, LLC, dated as of September 29, 2016
 
 
 
10.3
 
Sale, Purchase and Escrow Agreement by and between Redrock Noho Residential, LLC and Noho Commons Pacific Owner LLC dated as of September 29, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



55

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 6. Exhibits (continued)

Ex.
 
Description
 
 
 
 
31.1
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
31.2
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
32.1
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
32.2
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
99.1
 
Third Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program adopted February 16, 2016, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed February 22, 2016
 
 
 
 
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
 
 
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
 
 
 
 
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
 
 
 
 
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
 
 
 
 
101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
 
 
 
 
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase


56


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
 
 
 
 
Date:
November 14, 2016
By:
/S/ KEITH D. HALL        
 
 
 
Keith D. Hall
 
 
 
Chief Executive Officer and Director
 
 
 
(principal executive officer)
 
 
 
 
Date:
November 14, 2016
By:
/S/ JEFFREY K. WALDVOGEL
 
 
 
Jeffrey K. Waldvogel
 
 
 
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
 
 
 
(principal financial officer)

57