Attached files

file filename
EX-32.0 - EX-32.0 - FOSTER L B COd287028dex320.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - FOSTER L B COd287028dex312.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - FOSTER L B COd287028dex311.htm
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016

Or

 

¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number: 0-10436

L.B. Foster Company

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Pennsylvania   25-1324733
(State of Incorporation)  

(I. R. S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

415 Holiday Drive, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania   15220
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

(412) 928-3400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer   ¨    Accelerated filer   x
Non-accelerated filer   ¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

Class

   Outstanding at October 26, 2016  

Common Stock, Par Value $.01

     10,393,449 Shares   


Table of Contents

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

 

     Page  

PART I. Financial Information

  

Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited):

  

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

     3   

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

     4   

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

     5   

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

     6   

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

     8   

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     25   

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

     37   

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

     37   

PART II. Other Information

  

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

     38   

Item 1A. Risk Factors

     38   

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

     38   

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

     38   

Item 6. Exhibits

     39   

Signature

     40   

Index to Exhibits

     41   

 

2


Table of Contents

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share data)

 

     September 30,     December 31,  
     2016     2015  
     (Unaudited)        

ASSETS

    

Current assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 3,651     $ 33,312  

Accounts receivable - net

     64,908       78,487  

Inventories - net

     91,381       96,396  

Prepaid income tax

     7,389       1,131  

Other current assets

     6,195       5,148  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     173,524       214,474  

Property, plant, and equipment - net

     106,147       126,745  

Other assets:

    

Goodwill

     19,387       81,752  

Other intangibles - net

     65,813       134,927  

Deferred tax assets

     39,009       226  

Investments

     4,374       5,321  

Other assets

     3,026       3,215  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 411,280     $ 566,660  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

    

Current liabilities:

    

Accounts payable

   $ 41,287     $ 55,804  

Deferred revenue

     7,357       6,934  

Accrued payroll and employee benefits

     7,945       10,255  

Accrued warranty

     9,034       8,755  

Current maturities of long-term debt

     1,326       1,335  

Other accrued liabilities

     11,046       8,563  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     77,995       91,646  

Long-term debt

     134,299       167,419  

Deferred tax liabilities

     6,998       8,926  

Other long-term liabilities

     15,225       15,837  

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Common stock, par value $.01, authorized 20,000,000 shares; shares issued at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, 11,115,779; shares outstanding at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, 10,300,823 and 10,221,006, respectively

     111       111  

Paid-in capital

     44,220       46,681  

Retained earnings

     174,517       276,571  

Treasury stock - at cost, common stock, shares at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, 814,956 and 894,773, respectively

     (19,644     (22,591

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

     (22,441     (17,940
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

     176,763       282,832  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   $ 411,280     $ 566,660  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except share data)

 

     Three Months Ended
September 30,
    Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
     2016     2015     2016     2015  
     (Unaudited)     (Unaudited)  

Sales of goods

   $ 100,293     $ 147,648     $ 326,278     $ 417,224  

Sales of services

     14,351       28,411       50,670       68,161  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total net sales

     114,644       176,059       376,948       485,385  

Cost of goods sold

     81,674       117,474       260,705       328,461  

Cost of services sold

     13,167       22,547       44,667       53,143  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total cost of sales

     94,841       140,021       305,372       381,604  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

     19,803       36,038       71,576       103,781  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Selling and administrative expenses

     19,807       21,605       65,941       68,133  

Amortization expense

     1,763       3,337       7,818       8,950  

Asset impairments

     6,946       80,337       135,884       80,337  

Interest expense

     1,520       1,265       4,342       3,166  

Interest income

     (50     (66     (157     (160

Equity in loss of nonconsolidated investments

     263       299       946       312  

Other income

     (1,085     (537     (263     (1,245
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     29,164       106,240       214,511       159,493  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss before income taxes

     (9,361     (70,202     (142,935     (55,712

Income tax benefit

     (3,379     (12,780     (42,125     (7,939
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loss

   $ (5,982   $ (57,422   $ (100,810   $ (47,773
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic loss per common share

   $ (0.58   $ (5.60   $ (9.82   $ (4.65
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted loss per common share

   $ (0.58   $ (5.60   $ (9.82   $ (4.65
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Dividends paid per common share

   $ 0.04     $ 0.04     $ 0.12     $ 0.12  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands)

 

     Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
     September 30,     September 30,  
     2016     2015     2016     2015  
     (Unaudited)     (Unaudited)  

Net loss

   $ (5,982   $ (57,422   $ (100,810   $ (47,773
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:

        

Foreign currency translation adjustment

     (1,431     (3,297     (3,438     (4,783

Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges, net of tax expense (benefit) of $88, $(184) and $(815), $(184)

     137        (294     (1,286     (294

Reclassification of pension liability adjustments to earnings, net of tax expense of $38, $46 and $115, $140*

     73        90        223        271   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

     (1,221     (3,501     (4,501     (4,806
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive loss

   $ (7,203   $ (60,923   $ (105,311   $ (52,579
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

* Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income for pension obligations are charged to selling and administrative expense.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

 

     Nine Months Ended  
     September 30,  
     2016     2015  
     (Unaudited)  

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

    

Net loss

   $ (100,810   $ (47,773

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash provided by operating activities:

    

Deferred income taxes

     (39,690     (17,281

Depreciation

     10,620        10,593   

Amortization

     7,818        8,950   

Asset impairments

     135,884        80,337   

Equity loss in nonconsolidated investments

     946        312   

Loss on sales and disposals of property, plant, and equipment

     209        125   

Share-based compensation

     875        1,382   

Excess income tax deficiency (benefit) from share-based compensation

     124        (289

Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:

    

Accounts receivable

     13,491        (1,485

Inventories

     3,188        (1,283

Other current assets

     (379     625   

Prepaid income tax

     (6,436     2,969   

Other noncurrent assets

     117        (1,101

Dividends from LB Pipe & Coupling Products, LLC

     —          90   

Accounts payable

     (13,256     (16,058

Deferred revenue

     866        (317

Accrued payroll and employee benefits

     (2,294     (5,283

Other current liabilities

     956        (370

Other liabilities

     (353     (455
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     11,876        13,688   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

    

Proceeds from the sale of property, plant, and equipment

     923        389   

Capital expenditures on property, plant, and equipment

     (6,507     (11,618

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

     —          (193,871

Loans and capital contributions to equity method investment

     (635     (61
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used by investing activities

     (6,219     (205,161
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

6


Table of Contents

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)

(In thousands)

 

     Nine Months Ended  
     September 30,  
     2016     2015  

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

    

Repayments of debt

     (134,200     (108,777

Proceeds from debt

     101,075        289,764   

Proceeds from exercise of stock options and stock awards

     —          68   

Financing fees

     (712     (1,670

Treasury stock acquisitions

     (265     (2,686

Cash dividends on common stock paid to shareholders

     (1,244     (1,244

Excess income tax (deficiency) benefit from share-based compensation

     (124     289   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash (used) provided by financing activities

     (35,470     175,744   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

     152        (3,085

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

     (29,661     (18,814

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

     33,312        52,024   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

   $ 3,651      $ 33,210   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

    

Interest paid

   $ 3,485      $ 2,513   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income taxes paid

   $ 3,991      $ 6,280   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

7


Table of Contents

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all estimates and adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. However, actual results could differ from those estimates. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016. The year-end Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015 was derived from audited financial statements. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company” refer collectively to L.B. Foster Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Recently issued accounting standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification 605, “Revenue Recognition.” ASU 2014-09 is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. It also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating its implementation approach and assessing the impact of ASU 2014-09 on our financial position and results of operations.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”. The new accounting requirements include the accounting for, presentation of, and classification of leases. The guidance will result in most leases being capitalized as a right of use asset with a related liability on our balance sheets. The requirements of the new standard are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is in the process of analyzing the impact of ASU 2016-02 on our financial position and results of operations.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718).” This standard makes several modifications to Topic 718 related to the accounting for forfeitures, employer tax withholding on share-based compensation, and the financial statement presentation of excess tax benefits or deficiencies. ASU 2016-09 also clarifies the statement of cash flows presentation for certain components of share-based awards. The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, although early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of analyzing the impact of ASU 2016-09 on our financial position and results of operations.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, “Income Taxes – Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory (Topic 740”), which will require an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. The ASU is effective on January 1, 2018 with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-16 will have on our financial position and results of operations.

 

8


Table of Contents

2. BUSINESS SEGMENTS

The Company is a leading manufacturer, fabricator, and distributor of products and services for rail, construction, energy, and utility markets. The Company is organized and evaluated by product group, which is the basis for identifying reportable segments. Each segment represents a revenue-producing component of the Company for which separate financial information is produced internally and is subject to evaluation by the Company’s chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources. Each segment is evaluated based upon its respective contribution to the Company’s consolidated results based upon segment profit.

The following table illustrates revenues and profits (losses) from operations of the Company by segment for the periods indicated:

 

     Three Months Ended
September 30, 2016
     Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2016
 
     Net
Sales
     Segment
Profit (loss)
     Net
Sales
     Segment
Profit (loss)
 

Rail Products and Services

   $ 56,891       $ (2,047    $ 188,686       $ (26,474

Construction Products

     34,870         1,356         107,098         5,748   

Tubular and Energy Services

     22,883         (6,966      81,164         (111,876
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 114,644       $ (7,657    $ 376,948       $ (132,602
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     Three Months Ended
September 30, 2015
     Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2015
 
     Net
Sales
     Segment
Profit (loss)
     Net
Sales
     Segment
Profit (loss)
 

Rail Products and Services

   $ 87,972       $ 6,984       $ 252,530       $ 19,469   

Construction Products

     54,093         4,456         137,899         10,842   

Tubular and Energy Services

     33,994         (79,873      94,956         (77,557
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 176,059       $ (68,433    $ 485,385       $ (47,246
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Segment profits (losses) from operations, as shown above, include internal cost of capital charges for assets used in the segment at a rate of generally 1% per month. There has been no change in the measurement of segment profit from operations since December 31, 2015. The internal cost of capital charges are eliminated during the consolidation process.

The following table provides a reconciliation of reportable segment net profit from operations to the Company’s consolidated total:

 

           Three Months Ended                    Nine Months Ended          
     September 30,      September 30,  
     2016      2015      2016      2015  

Loss for reportable segments

   $ (7,657    $ (68,433    $ (132,602    $ (47,246

Interest expense

     (1,520      (1,265      (4,342      (3,166

Interest income

     50         66         157         160   

Other income

     1,085         537         263         1,245   

LIFO income

     917         181         1,442         581   

Equity in loss of nonconsolidated investments

     (263      (299      (946      (312

Corporate expense, cost of capital elimination, and other unallocated charges

     (1,973      (989      (6,907      (6,974
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loss before income taxes

   $ (9,361    $ (70,202    $ (142,935    $ (55,712
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

9


Table of Contents

The following table illustrates assets of the Company by segment:

 

     September 30,
2016
     December 31,
2015
 

Rail Products and Services

   $ 155,657       $ 241,222   

Construction Products

     83,061         86,335   

Tubular and Energy Services

     103,976         216,715   

Unallocated corporate assets

     68,586         22,388   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 411,280       $ 566,660   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

3. ACQUISITIONS

TEW Plus, LTD

On November 23, 2015, the Company acquired the 75% balance of the remaining shares of TEW Plus, LTD (“Tew Plus”) for $2,130, net of cash acquired. Headquartered in Nottingham, UK, Tew Plus provides telecommunications and security systems to the railway and commercial markets. Their offerings include full installation services including: design; project management; survey; and commissioning along with future maintenance. The results of Tew Plus’ operations are included within the Rail Products and Services segment from the date of acquisition.

Inspection Oilfield Services

On March 13, 2015, the Company acquired IOS Holdings, Inc. (“IOS” or “test and inspection services”) for $167,404, net of cash acquired and a net working capital receivable adjustment of $2,363. The purchase agreement includes an earn-out provision for the seller to generate an additional $60,000 of proceeds upon achieving certain levels of EBITDA during the three-year period beginning on January 1, 2015. The Company has not accrued an estimated earn-out obligation based upon a probability weighted valuation model of the projected EBITDA results, which indicates that the minimum target will not be achieved. Approximately $7,600 of the purchase price relates to amounts held in escrow to satisfy potential indemnity claims made under the purchase agreement. Headquartered in Houston, TX, IOS is a leading independent provider of tubular management services with operations in every significant oil and gas producing region in the continental United States. The results of IOS are included within our Tubular and Energy Services segment from the date of acquisition.

Tew Holdings, LTD

On January 13, 2015, the Company acquired Tew Holdings, LTD (“Tew”) for $26,467, net of cash acquired. The purchase price includes approximately $4,200 related to working capital and net debt adjustments. The non-domestic cash payment includes approximately $600 which is held in escrow to satisfy potential indemnity claims made under the purchase agreement. Headquartered in Nottingham, UK, Tew provides application engineering solutions primarily to the rail market and other major industries. The results of Tew’s operations are included within the Rail Products and Services segment from the date of acquisition.

Acquisition Summary

Each transaction was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which requires an acquiring entity to recognize, with limited exceptions, all of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at fair value as of the acquisition date. Goodwill primarily represents the value paid for each acquisition’s enhancement to the Company’s product and service offerings and capabilities, as well as a premium payment related to the ability to control the acquired assets. The Company has concluded that intangible assets and goodwill values resulting from the IOS, Tew, and Tew Plus transactions are not deductible for tax purposes.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition:

 

Allocation of Purchase Price

   November 23,
2015 - Tew Plus
     March 13,
2015 - IOS
     January 13,
2015 -Tew
 

Current assets

   $ 4,420       $ 19,877       $ 12,125   

Other assets

     —           708         —     

Property, plant, and equipment

     47         51,453      2,398   

Goodwill

     822         69,908      8,772   

Other intangibles

     1,074         50,354      14,048   

Liabilities assumed

     (3,597      (23,596      (6,465
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 2,766       $ 168,704       $ 30,878   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

10


Table of Contents
* - As a result of the impact of the downturn within the energy markets, the expectations of a prolonged period before recovery, and the reduction in active U.S. land oil rig count, the Company performed an interim test for impairment of goodwill during the third quarter of 2015 that resulted in the full impairment of goodwill related to the IOS acquisition. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2016, the Company performed an interim impairment test due to further deterioration in projections that resulted in impairment of property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets as described in Notes 4 and 5.

The following table summarizes the estimates of the fair values of the identifiable intangible assets acquired:

 

Intangible Asset

   November 23,
2015 - Tew Plus
     March 13,
2015 - IOS
    January 13,
2015 - Tew
 

Trade name

   $ —         $ 2,641      $ 870   

Customer relationships

     817         41,171        10,035   

Technology

     203         4,364        2,480   

Non-competition agreements

     54         2,178        663   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total identified intangible assets

   $ 1,074       $ 50,354 **    $ 14,048   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

** - See Note 5 regarding intangible asset impairments.

4. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant, and equipment at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 consist of the following:

 

     September 30,      December 31,  
     2016      2015  

Land

   $ 14,848       $ 17,054   

Improvements to land and leaseholds

     17,626         16,590   

Buildings

     33,917         39,366   

Machinery and equipment, including equipment under capitalized leases

     116,355         118,677   

Construction in progress

     3,598         11,844   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     186,344         203,531   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization, including accumulated amortization of capitalized leases

     80,197         76,786   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 106,147       $ 126,745   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

We review our property, plant, and equipment for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that carrying amounts may not be recoverable. We recognize an impairment loss if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. Due to the deterioration in projected results from the IOS subsidiary within the Tubular and Energy Services segment, the undiscounted cash flows were unable to support the carrying value of the asset group. The Company utilized level 3 unobservable inputs, specifically, the discounted cash flow method, to determine the expected net cash flows generated by the continued use of the assets. As a result of the testing, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment of $14,956 during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016. The impairment is included within “Asset impairments” caption of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

11


Table of Contents

5. GOODWILL AND DEFINITE-LIVED INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The following table represents the goodwill balance by reportable segment:

 

     Rail Products and
Services
     Construction
Products
     Tubular and Energy
Services
     Total  

Balance at December 31, 2015

   $ 48,188       $ 5,147       $ 28,417       $ 81,752   

Foreign currency translation impact

     (1,069      —           —           (1,069

Disposition

     (154      —           —           (154

Impairment charges

     (32,725      —           (28,417      (61,142
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at September 30, 2016

   $ 14,240       $ 5,147       $ —         $ 19,387   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The Company performs goodwill impairment tests annually during the fourth quarter, and also performs interim goodwill impairment tests if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount. Qualitative factors are assessed to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount. During the current year, various reporting units underperformed against their projections and revised their forecasts downward. The revised forecasts, which were primarily attributable to weakness in the rail and energy markets, indicated longer recovery horizons than we previously projected. In connection with the revisions to the longer term projections and a substantial decline in market capitalization, the Company concluded that these qualitative factors indicated that there was a more likely than not risk that the carrying value of goodwill exceeded its fair value.

As a result of the Company’s qualitative review, with the assistance of an independent valuation firm, the Company performed a quantitative interim test for impairment of goodwill as of June 1, 2016. The valuation included the use of both the income and market approaches. Greater weighting was applied to the income approach as the Company believes it is the most reliable indication of value as it captures forecasted revenues and earnings for the reporting units in the projection period that the market approach may not directly incorporate. In addition, a lack of comparable market transactions in recent months has limited the availability of information necessary for the market approach.

The results of the test indicated that the Rail Technologies (within the Rail Products and Services segment), Chemtec Energy Services, LLC (or “precision measurement systems”), and coated services (Chemtec and coated services are within the Tubular and Energy Services segment) reporting units’ respective fair values were less than their carrying value. All other reporting units that maintain goodwill substantially exceeded their carrying value and were not at risk of impairment. As a result of the continued weakness in the commodity cycles impacting the energy and rail markets, the near term projections of these reporting units have deteriorated and the expected future growth of the Rail Technologies, Chemtec, and coated services reporting units was determined to be insufficient to support the carrying values.

The Company determined the implied fair values of the Rail Technologies, Chemtec, and coated services reporting units by using level 3 unobservable inputs, which incorporated assumptions that we believe would be a reasonable market participant’s view in a hypothetical purchase, to develop the discounted cash flows of the respective reporting units. Significant level 3 inputs included the projected revenue and cost growth rates, capital expenditures, and weighted average costs of capital assumptions. The resulting fair values of each reporting unit were allocated to the assets and liabilities of the respective reporting unit as if each reporting unit had been acquired in business combinations as of the test date and the fair value was the purchase price paid to acquire each reporting unit. The results of the step 2 analysis indicated that the carrying amounts of the goodwill of Rail Technologies, Chemtec, and coated services exceeded the implied fair values of that goodwill. Accordingly, the Company recognized a non-cash goodwill impairment of $61,142, which represented the full impairment of goodwill within the Chemtec and coated services reporting units and approximately 68% of the Rail Technologies goodwill value. The impairment charge includes $4,383 related to Rail Technologies’ goodwill which was recorded during the three-month period ended September 30, 2016 as a result of the finalization of the interim impairment assessment, which the Company commenced during the second quarter.

The following table represents the gross definite-lived intangible assets balance by reportable segment:

 

     September 30,      December 31,  
     2016      2015  

Rail Products and Services

   $ 57,134       $ 59,226   

Construction Products

     1,348         1,348   

Tubular and Energy Services

     29,179         98,166   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 87,661       $ 158,740   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

12


Table of Contents

Due to the indicators previously noted, the Company performed recoverability tests on reporting units when it was more likely than not that the carrying value of the long-lived asset group would not be recoverable. The results of our testing indicated that the long-lived assets related to the IOS and Chemtec divisions, within the Tubular and Energy Services segment, had carrying values in excess of the asset groups’ fair value. Based upon level 3 unobservable inputs, the Company incorporated assumptions that we believe would be a reasonable market participant’s view in a hypothetical purchase, to develop the discounted cash flows. Significant level 3 inputs included the projected revenue and cost growth rates, capital expenditures, and weighted average costs of capital assumptions. As a result of the analysis, the Company recorded a $42,982 non-cash impairment of definite-lived intangible assets related to the IOS division and a $16,804 non-cash impairment of definite-lived intangible assets related to the Chemtec division. Included within the Chemtec impairment is $2,563 recorded during the three-month period ended September 30, 2016 as a result of the finalization of the Company’s interim impairment review, which the Company commenced during the second quarter.

The components of the Company’s definite-lived intangible assets are as follows:

 

     September 30, 2016  
     Weighted Average
Amortization
Period In Years
     Gross
Carrying
Value
     Accumulated
Amortization
     Net
Carrying
Amount
 

Non-compete agreements

     5       $ 4,252       $ (2,005    $ 2,247   

Patents

     10         380         (145      235   

Customer relationships

     17         37,295         (6,069      31,226   

Trademarks and trade names

     14         10,054         (3,036      7,018   

Technology

     14         35,680         (10,593      25,087   
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
      $ 87,661       $ (21,848    $ 65,813   
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     December 31, 2015  
     Weighted Average
Amortization
Period In Years
     Gross
Carrying
Value
     Accumulated
Amortization
     Net
Carrying
Amount
 

Non-compete agreements

     4       $ 6,984       $ (2,495    $ 4,489   

Patents

     10         378         (124      254   

Customer relationships

     16         94,338         (8,441      85,897   

Supplier relationships

     5         350         (335      15   

Trademarks and trade names

     13         14,252         (3,025      11,227   

Technology

     13         42,438         (9,393      33,045   
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
      $ 158,740       $ (23,813    $ 134,927   
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Definite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives ranging from 2 to 25 years, with a total weighted average amortization period of approximately 15 years at September 30, 2016. Amortization expense for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $1,763 and $3,337, respectively. Amortization expense for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $7,818 and $8,950, respectively.

Estimated amortization expense for the remainder of 2016 and thereafter is as follows:

 

     Amortization Expense  

2016

   $ 1,780   

2017

     7,112   

2018

     7,008   

2019

     6,276   

2020

     5,909   

2021 and thereafter

     37,728   
  

 

 

 
   $ 65,813   
  

 

 

 

 

13


Table of Contents

6. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Credit is extended based upon an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition and, while collateral is not required, the Company periodically receives surety bonds that guarantee payment. The amounts of trade accounts receivable at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 have been reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,750 and $1,485, respectively.

7. INVENTORIES

Inventories at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are summarized in the following table:

 

     September 30,
2016
     December 31,
2015
 

Finished goods

   $ 54,659       $ 62,547   

Work-in-process

     20,418         20,178   

Raw materials

     20,683         19,492   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total inventories at current costs

     95,760         102,217   

Less: LIFO reserve

     (4,379      (5,821
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 91,381       $ 96,396   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Inventory is generally valued at the lower of last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) cost or market. Other inventories of the Company are valued at average cost or market, whichever is lower. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method is made at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s estimates of expected year-end levels and costs.

8. INVESTMENTS

The Company is a member of a joint venture, LB Pipe & Coupling Products, LLC (“LB Pipe JV”), in which it maintains a 45% ownership interest. LB Pipe JV manufactures, markets, and sells various precision coupling products for the energy, utility, and construction markets and is scheduled to terminate on June 30, 2019.

Under applicable guidance for variable interest entities in ASC 810, “Consolidation,” the Company determined that the LB Pipe JV is a variable interest entity. The Company concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary of the variable interest entity, as the Company does not have a controlling financial interest and does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the LB Pipe JV. Accordingly, the Company concluded that the equity method of accounting remains appropriate.

At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had a nonconsolidated equity method investment of $4,245 and $5,246, respectively, in LB Pipe JV and other equity investments totaling $129 and $75, respectively.

The Company recorded equity in the loss of LB Pipe JV of $276 and $292 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded equity in the loss of LB Pipe JV of $1,001 and $289, respectively.

The Company continues to monitor the recoverability of the assets associated with LB Pipe JV and the long-term financial projections of the businesses.

During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2015, the Company received cash distributions from LB Pipe JV of $90. There were no changes to the members’ ownership interests as a result of the distribution. During 2016, the Company and the other 45% member each executed a revolving line of credit with the LB Pipe JV with an available limit of $750. The Company and the other 45% member each loaned $635 to the LB Pipe JV in an effort to maintain compliance with the LB Pipe JV’s debt covenants with an unaffiliated bank. The Company’s loan with the LB Pipe JV matures on December 15, 2016.

 

14


Table of Contents

The Company’s exposure to loss results from its capital contributions and lending activity, net of the Company’s share of the LB Pipe JV’s income or loss, and its net investment in the direct financing lease covering the facility used by the LB Pipe JV for its operations, which is described below. The carrying amounts with the maximum exposure to loss of the Company at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, are as follows:

 

     September 30,
2016
     December 31,
2015
 

LB Pipe JV equity method investment

   $ 4,245       $ 5,246   

Loan receivable

     635         —     

Net investment in direct financing lease

     899         995   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 5,779       $ 6,241   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The Company is leasing five acres of land and two facilities to the LB Pipe JV through June 30, 2019, with a 5.5-year renewal period. The current monthly lease payments approximate $17, with a balloon payment of approximately $488, which is required to be paid either at the termination of the lease, allocated over the renewal period, or during the initial term of the lease. This lease qualifies as a direct financing lease under the applicable guidance in ASC 840-30, “Leases.”

The following is a schedule of the direct financing minimum lease payments for the remainder of 2016 and the years 2017 and thereafter:

 

     Minimum Lease Payments  

2016

   $ 35   

2017

     140   

2018

     150   

2019

     574   
  

 

 

 
   $ 899   
  

 

 

 

9. LONG-TERM DEBT

United States

Long-term debt consists of the following:

 

     September 30,      December 31,  
     2016      2015  

Revolving credit facility

   $ 132,847       $ 165,000   

Capital leases and financing agreements

     2,778         3,754   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     135,625         168,754   

Less current maturities

     1,326         1,335   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Long-term portion

   $ 134,299       $ 167,419   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

On June 29, 2016, L.B. Foster Company, its domestic subsidiaries, and certain of its Canadian subsidiaries (“L.B. Foster”) entered into the First Amendment (the “First Amendment”) to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 13, 2015 (the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”), with PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company. This First Amendment modifies the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which had a maximum credit line of $335,000. The First Amendment reduces the permitted borrowings to $275,000. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement has been amended subsequent to September 30, 2016. See Note 16 “Subsequent Events”.

The Company’s and the domestic guarantors’ obligations under the First Amendment are secured by the grant of a security interest by the domestic borrowers and domestic guarantors in substantially all of the personal property owned by such entities. Additionally, the equity interests in each of the domestic loan parties, other than the Company, and the equity interests held by each domestic loan party in their domestic subsidiaries, are pledged to the lenders as collateral for the lending obligations.

 

15


Table of Contents

Borrowings under the First Amendment bear interest at rates based upon either the base rate or Euro-rate plus applicable margins. Applicable margins are dictated by the ratio of the Company’s indebtedness less consolidated cash on hand to the Company’s consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the underlying Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The base rate is the highest of (a) PNC Bank’s prime rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% or (c) the daily Euro-rate (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) plus 1.00%. The base rate and Euro-rate spreads range from 0.025% to 2.25% and 1.25% to 3.25%, respectively.

The First Amendment provides that liens on the collateral will be released upon satisfaction of certain conditions, including the submission by the loan parties of a compliance certificate for two consecutive fiscal quarters, calculated for the four consecutive fiscal quarters then ending, each evidencing a Leverage Ratio (defined as the Company’s indebtedness less cash on hand in excess of $15,000, divided by the Company’s consolidated EBITDA) of less than or equal to 2.75 to 1.00; provided that the last day of such two consecutive fiscal quarters cannot be earlier than June 30, 2018.

Certain financial covenants in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement were also amended. The First Amendment revises the maximum Leverage Ratio, which must not exceed the amounts set forth below for applicable fiscal quarters: June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2016, 4.75 to 1.00; December 31, 2016, 4.50 to 1.00; March 31, 2017, 4.25 to 1.00; June 30, 2017, 4.00 to 1.00; September 30, 2017, 3.75 to 1.00; December 31, 2017, 3.50 to 1.00; and March 31, 2018 and all fiscal quarters ending thereafter, 3.25 to 1.00.

At September 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with the covenants in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as revised by the First Amendment.

Loans and advances to non-loan parties and loans, advances, and investments by domestic loan parties to subsidiaries that are not loan parties and to foreign loan parties is not permitted to exceed $10,000 in the aggregate at any one time, provided that, on March 31, 2018, when the Maximum Leverage Ratio requirement is 3.25 to 1.00, this limit will increase to $75,000.

The First Amendment permits the Company to pay dividends, distributions, and make redemptions with respect to its stock provided no event of default or potential default (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) has occurred prior to or after giving effect to the dividend, distribution, or redemption. Dividends, distributions, and redemptions are capped at $4,000 per year when funds are drawn on the facility until March 31, 2018, when the maximum Leverage Ratio requirement is 3.25 to 1.00, at which time this limit will increase to $25,000. Dividends of $1,244 or $0.12 per share were distributed for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016.

If no drawings on the facility exist, dividends, distributions, and redemptions in excess of $4,000 (or $25,000, as appropriate) per year are subjected to a limitation of $75,000 in the aggregate. The $75,000 aggregate limitation also permits certain loans, investments, and acquisitions.

The First Amendment provides that each of the loan parties and their subsidiaries shall not enter into any merger, consolidation, or other reorganization, or acquire all or substantially all of the assets, division, business, stock, or other ownership interests or permit any consolidation or merger with an aggregate consideration in excess of $12,000 until after March 31, 2018.

At September 30, 2016, the Company had outstanding letters of credit of approximately $425 and had gross available borrowing capacity of $141,728. The current quarter reduction in debt was largely attributable to $26,000 of short-term intercompany advances from foreign subsidiaries into the U.S., which was used to fund our revolving credit facility at September 30, 2016. The maturity date of the First Amendment is March 13, 2020.

United Kingdom

A subsidiary of the Company has a credit facility with NatWest Bank for its United Kingdom operations that includes an overdraft availability of £1,500 pounds sterling (approximately $1,946 at September 30, 2016). This credit facility supports the subsidiary’s working capital requirements and is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of its United Kingdom operations. The interest rate on this facility is the financial institution’s base rate plus 1.50%. Outstanding performance bonds reduce availability under this credit facility. The subsidiary of the Company had no outstanding borrowings under this credit facility as of September 30, 2016. There was approximately $311 in outstanding guarantees (as defined in the underlying agreement) at September 30, 2016. This credit facility was renewed and amended during the fourth quarter of 2015 to include Tew and Tew Plus as parties to the agreement. All other underlying terms and conditions remained unchanged as a result of the renewal. It is the Company’s intention to renew this credit facility with NatWest Bank during the annual review in the fourth quarter 2016.

 

16


Table of Contents

The United Kingdom credit facility contains certain financial covenants that require that subsidiary to maintain senior interest and cash flow coverage ratios. The subsidiary was in compliance with these financial covenants as of September 30, 2016. The subsidiary had available borrowing capacity of $1,635 as of September 30, 2016.

10. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company determines the fair value of assets and liabilities based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. The fair values are based on assumptions that market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in valuation techniques and the inputs to valuations. The fair value hierarchy is based on whether the inputs to valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s own assumptions of what market participants would use. The fair value hierarchy includes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value as described below:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Cash equivalents - Included within “Cash and cash equivalents” are investments in non-domestic term deposits. The carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short maturity of the instruments.

LIBOR-Based interest rate swaps - To reduce the impact of interest rate changes on outstanding variable-rate debt, the Company entered into forward starting LIBOR-Based interest rate swaps with notional values totaling $50,000. The swaps will become effective in February 2017, at which point it will effectively convert a portion of the debt from variable to fixed-rate borrowings during the term of the swap contract. The fair value of the interest rate swaps is based on market-observable forward interest rates and represents the estimated amount that the Company would pay to terminate the agreements. As such, the swap agreements are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. At September 30, 2016, the interest rate swaps were recorded within other accrued liabilities.

 

     Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using      Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using  
     September 30,
2016
     Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
     December 31,
2015
     Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Term deposits

   $ 16      $ 16      $ —         $ —         $ 1,939      $ 1,939      $ —         $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 16      $ 16      $ —         $ —         $ 1,939      $ 1,939      $ —         $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

   $ 2,307      $ —         $ 2,307      $ —         $ 196      $ —         $ 196      $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   $ 2,307      $ —         $ 2,307      $ —         $ 196      $ —         $ 196      $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

17


Table of Contents

11. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

(Share amounts in thousands)

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common share for the periods indicated:

 

    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2016     2015     2016     2015  

Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per common share - (Loss) available to common stockholders:

       

Net loss

  $ (5,982   $ (57,422   $ (100,810   $ (47,773

Denominator:

       

Weighted average shares outstanding

    10,296        10,256        10,264        10,266   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Denominator for basic earnings per common share

    10,296        10,256        10,264        10,266   

Effect of dilutive securities:

       

Employee stock options

    —          —          —          —     

Other stock compensation plans

    —          —          —          —     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Dilutive potential common shares

    —          —          —          —     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Denominator for diluted earnings per common share - adjusted weighted average shares outstanding and assumed conversions

    10,296        10,256        10,264        10,266   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic loss per common share

  $ (0.58   $ (5.60   $ (9.82   $ (4.65
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted loss per common share

  $ (0.58   $ (5.60   $ (9.82   $ (4.65
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Dividends paid per common share

  $ 0.04      $ 0.04      $ 0.12      $ 0.12   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

During the three-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, there were approximately 34 and 48 anti-dilutive shares excluded from the preceding calculation, respectively. During the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, there were 80 and 81 anti-dilutive shares excluded from the preceding calculation, respectively.

12. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company applies the provisions of FASB ASC 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation,” to account for the Company’s share-based compensation. Share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the calculated fair value of the award and is recognized over the employees’ requisite service period. The Company recorded stock compensation expense of $320 and $(514) for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, related to restricted stock awards and performance unit awards. Stock compensation expense of $875 and $1,382 was recorded for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. At September 30, 2016, unrecognized compensation expense for awards that the Company expects to vest approximated $1,955. The Company will recognize this expense over the upcoming four years through August 2020.

Shares issued as a result of vested stock-based compensation generally will be from previously issued shares that have been reacquired by the Company and held as Treasury shares or authorized but previously unissued common stock.

During the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized reductions in excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation of $124 and excess tax benefits of $289, respectively. The change in excess income tax benefits have been included in cash flows from financing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Stock Option Awards

At September 30, 2016, there were no outstanding and exercisable stock options. During the first quarter of 2015, the remaining 7,500 outstanding stock options were exercised at a weighted average exercise price of $9.08. There were no new grants of stock option awards during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.

 

18


Table of Contents

Restricted Stock Awards and Performance Unit Awards

Under the amended and restated 2006 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, the Company grants eligible employees restricted stock and performance unit awards. The forfeitable restricted stock awards granted prior to March 2015 generally time-vest after a four-year holding period, and those granted subsequent to March 2015 generally time-vest ratably over a three-year period, unless indicated otherwise by the underlying restricted stock award agreement. Performance unit awards are offered annually under separate three-year long-term incentive plans. Performance units are subject to forfeiture and will be converted into common stock of the Company based upon the Company’s performance relative to performance measures and conversion multiples as defined in the underlying plan. If the Company’s estimate of the number of performance stock awards expected to vest changes in a subsequent accounting period, cumulative compensation expense could increase or decrease. The change will be recognized in the current period for the vested shares and would change future expense over the remaining vesting period.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, the Company, with shareholder approval, amended its 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan and registered 370,000 additional shares under the amendment. During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the 2016 Performance Share Unit Program, the Executive Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (consisting of cash and equity components) and the 2016 Free Cash Flow Program (cash award only). The Compensation Committee also certified the actual performance achievement of participants in the 2013 Performance Share Unit Program. Actual performance resulted in no payout relative to the target performance metrics.

The following table summarizes the restricted stock award and performance unit award activity for the period ended September 30, 2016:

 

     Restricted
Stock
Units
     Performance
Stock Units
     Weighted
Average
Grant
Date  Fair
Value
 

Outstanding at December 31, 2015

     93,817         35,999       $ 39.66   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Granted

     48,283         129,844         12.50   

Vested

     (43,453      —           29.30   

Adjustment for incentive awards not expected to vest

     —           (93,103      24.79   

Canceled

     (6,021      (9,050      18.82   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Outstanding at September 30, 2016

     92,626         63,690       $ 21.88   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

13. RETIREMENT PLANS

Retirement Plans

The Company has seven retirement plans which cover its hourly and salaried employees in the United States: three defined benefit plans (one active / two frozen) and four defined contribution plans. Employees are eligible to participate in the appropriate plan based on employment classification. The Company’s funding contributions to the defined benefit and defined contribution plans are governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), applicable plan policy and investment guidelines. The Company’s policy is to contribute at least the minimum in accordance with the funding standards of ERISA.

The Company’s subsidiary, L.B. Foster Rail Technologies, Inc. (“Rail Technologies”), maintains two defined contribution plans for its employees in Canada, as well as a post-retirement benefit plan. In the United Kingdom, Rail Technologies maintains two defined contribution plans and a defined benefit plan.

 

19


Table of Contents

United States Defined Benefit Plans

Net periodic pension costs for the United States defined benefit pension plans for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended      Nine Months Ended  
     September 30,      September 30,  
     2016      2015      2016      2015  

Service cost

   $ 9       $ 10       $ 27       $ 29   

Interest cost

     186         185         559         555   

Expected return on plan assets

     (179      (203      (538      (611

Recognized net actuarial loss

     69         69         207         207   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net periodic pension cost

   $   85       $ 61       $ 255       $ 180   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The Company does not expect to contribute to its United States defined benefit plans in 2016.

United Kingdom Defined Benefit Plans

Net periodic pension costs for the United Kingdom defined benefit pension plan for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended      Nine Months Ended  
     September 30,      September 30,  
     2016      2015      2016      2015  

Interest cost

   $ 73       $ 78       $ 223       $ 231   

Expected return on plan assets

     (82      (83      (250      (249

Amortization of prior service costs and transition amount

     5         5         15         15   

Recognized net actuarial loss

     38            60         116         177   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net periodic pension cost

   $      34       $   60       $    104       $    174   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

United Kingdom regulations require trustees to adopt a prudent approach to funding required contributions to defined benefit pension plans. Employer contributions of approximately $240 are anticipated to the United Kingdom L.B. Foster Rail Technologies, Inc. pension plan during 2016. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company contributed approximately $180 to the plan.

Defined Contribution Plans

The Company sponsors eight defined contribution plans for hourly and salaried employees across our domestic and international facilities. The following table summarizes the expense associated with the contributions made to these plans.

 

     Three Months Ended      Nine Months Ended  
     September 30,      September 30,  
     2016      2015      2016      2015  

United States

   $ 152       $ 413       $ 1,289       $ 1,842   

Canada

     46         54         164         167   

United Kingdom

     64          162         281         360   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $    262       $ 629       $ 1,734       $ 2,369   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Product Liability Claims

The Company is subject to product warranty claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. For certain manufactured products, the Company maintains a product warranty accrual which is adjusted on a monthly basis as a percentage of cost of sales. The product warranty accrual is periodically adjusted based on the identification or resolution of known individual product warranty claims.

 

20


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the Company’s product warranty accrual:

 

     Warranty Liability  

Balance at December 31, 2015

   $ 8,755   

Additions to warranty liability

     961   

Warranty liability utilized

     (682
  

 

 

 

Balance at September 30, 2016

   $ 9,034   
  

 

 

 

Included within the above table are concrete tie warranty reserves of approximately $7,460 and $7,544 at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) Concrete Tie Matter

On July 12, 2011, UPRR notified (the “UPRR Notice”) the Company and its subsidiary, CXT Incorporated (“CXT”), of a warranty claim under CXT’s 2005 supply contract relating to the sale of pre-stressed concrete railroad ties to UPRR. UPRR asserted that a significant percentage of concrete ties manufactured in 2006 through 2011 at CXT’s Grand Island, NE facility failed to meet contract specifications, had workmanship defects and were cracking and failing prematurely. Of the 3.0 million ties manufactured between 1998 and 2011 from the Grand Island, NE facility, approximately 1.6 million ties were sold during the period UPRR had claimed nonconformance. The 2005 contract called for each concrete tie which failed to conform to the specifications or had a material defect in workmanship to be replaced with 1.5 new concrete ties, provided, that, within five years of the sale of a concrete tie, UPRR notified CXT of such failure to conform or such defect in workmanship. The UPRR Notice did not specify how many ties manufactured during this period were defective nor the exact nature of the alleged workmanship defect.

Following the UPRR Notice, the Company worked with material scientists and pre-stressed concrete experts to test a representative sample of Grand Island, NE concrete ties and assess warranty claims for certain concrete ties made in its Grand Island, NE facility between 1998 and 2011. The Company discontinued manufacturing operations in Grand Island, NE in early 2011.

2012

During 2012, the Company completed sufficient testing and analysis to further understand this matter. Based upon testing results and expert analysis, the Company believed it discovered conditions, which largely related to the 2006 to 2007 manufacturing period, that can shorten the life of the concrete ties produced during this period. During the fourth quarter of 2012 and first quarter of 2013, the Company reached agreement with UPRR on several matters including a process for the Company and UPRR to work together to identify, prioritize, and replace defective ties that meet the criteria for replacement. This process applies to the ties the Company shipped to UPRR from its Grand Island, NE facility from 1998 to 2011. During most of this period, the Company’s warranty policy for UPRR carried a 5-year warranty with a 1.5:1 replacement ratio for any defective ties. In order to accommodate UPRR and other customer concerns, the Company also reverted to a previously used warranty policy providing a 15-year warranty with a 1:1 replacement ratio. This change provided an additional 10 years of warranty protection. In the amended 2005 supply agreement, the Company and UPRR also extended the supply of Tucson ties by five years and agreed on a cash payment of $12,000 to UPRR as compensation for concrete ties already replaced by UPRR during the investigation period.

During 2012, as a result of the testing that the Company conducted on concrete ties manufactured at its former Grand Island, NE facility and the developments related to UPRR and other customer matters, the Company recorded pre-tax warranty charges of $22,000 in “Cost of Goods Sold” within its Rail Products and Services segment based on the Company’s estimate of the number of defective concrete ties that will ultimately require replacement during the applicable warranty periods.

2013

Throughout 2013, at UPRR’s request and under the terms of the amended 2005 supply agreement, the Company provided warranty replacement concrete ties for use across certain UPRR subdivisions. The Company attempted to reconcile the quantity of warranty claims for ties replaced and obtain supporting detail for the ties removed. The Company believes that UPRR did not replace concrete ties in accordance with the amended agreement and has not furnished adequate documentation throughout the replacement process in these subdivisions to support its full warranty claim. Based on the information received by the Company to date, the Company believes that a significant number of ties which UPRR replaced in these subdivisions did not meet the criteria to be covered as warranty replacement ties under the amended 2005 supply agreement. The disagreement related to the 2013 warranty replacement activity includes approximately 170,000 ties where the Company provided detailed documentation supporting our position with reason codes that detail why these ties are not eligible for a warranty claim.

 

21


Table of Contents

In late November 2013, the Company received notice from UPRR asserting a material breach of the amended 2005 supply agreement. UPRR’s notice asserted that the failure to honor its claims for warranty ties in these subdivisions was a material breach. Following receipt of this notice, the Company provided information to UPRR to refute UPRR’s claim of breach and included the reconciliation of warranty claims supported by substantial findings from the Company’s track observation team, all within the 90-day cure period. The Company also proposed further discussions to reach agreement on reconciliation for 2013 replacement activities and future replacement activities and a recommended process that will ensure future replacement activities are done with appropriate documentation and per the terms of the amended 2005 supply agreement.

2014

During the first quarter of 2014, the Company further responded within the 90-day cure period to UPRR’s claim and presented a reconciliation for the subdivisions at issue. This proposed reconciliation was based on empirical data and visual observation from Company employees that were present during the replacement process for a substantial majority of the concrete ties replaced. The Company spent considerable time documenting facts related to concrete tie condition and track condition to assess whether the ties replaced met the criteria to be eligible for replacement under the terms of the amended 2005 supply agreement.

During 2014, the Company increased its accrual by an additional $8,766 based on revised estimates of ties to be replaced based upon scientific testing and other analysis, adjusted for ties already provided to UPRR. The Company continued to work with UPRR to identify, replace, and reconcile defective ties related to the warranty claim in accordance with the amended 2005 supply agreement. The Company and UPRR met during the third quarter of 2014 to evaluate each other’s position in an effort to work towards agreement on the unreconciled 2013 and 2014 replacement activity as well as the standards and practices to be implemented for future replacement activity and warranty tie replacement.

In November and December of 2014, the Company received additional notices from UPRR asserting that ties manufactured in 2000 were defective and again asserting material breaches of the amended 2005 supply agreement relating to warranty tie replacements as well as certain new ties provided to UPRR being out of specification.

At December 31, 2014, the Company and UPRR had not been able to reconcile the disagreement related to the 2013 and 2014 warranty replacement activity. The disagreement relating to the 2014 warranty replacement activity includes approximately 90,100 ties that the Company believes are not warranty-eligible.

2015

On January 23, 2015, UPRR filed a Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial in the District Court for Douglas County, NE against the Company and its subsidiary, CXT, asserting, among other matters, that the Company breached its express warranty, breached an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and anticipatorily repudiated its warranty obligations, and that UPRR’s exclusive and limited remedy provisions in the supply agreement have failed of their essential purpose which entitles UPRR to recover all incidental and consequential damages. The Complaint seeks to cancel all duties of UPRR under the contract, to adjudge the Company as having no remaining rights under the contracts, and to recover damages in an amount to be determined at trial for the value of unfulfilled warranty replacement ties and ties likely to become warranty eligible, for costs of cover for replacement ties, and for various incidental and consequential damages. The amended 2005 supply agreement provides that UPRR’s exclusive remedy is to receive a replacement tie that meets the contract specifications for each tie that failed to meet the contract specifications or otherwise contained a material defect provided that the Company receives written notice of such failure or defect within 15 years after that tie was produced. The amended 2005 supply agreement provides that the Company’s warranty does not apply to ties that (a) have been repaired or altered without the Company’s written consent in such a way as to affect the stability or reliability thereof, (b) have been subject to misuse, negligence, or accident, or (c) have been improperly maintained or used contrary to the specifications for which such ties were produced. The amended 2005 supply agreement also continues to provide that the Company’s warranty is in lieu of all other express or implied warranties and that neither party shall be subject to or liable for any incidental or consequential damages to the other party. The dispute is largely based on (1) claims submitted that the Company believes are for ties claimed for warranty replacement that are inaccurately rated and are not the responsibility of the Company and claims that do not meet the criteria of a warranty replacement and (2) UPRR’s assertion, which the Company vigorously disputes, that UPRR in future years will be entitled to warranty replacement ties for virtually all of the Grand Island ties. Many thousands of Grand Island ties have been performing in track for over ten years. In addition, a significant amount of Grand Island ties were rated by both parties in the excellent category of the rating system.

In June 2015, UPRR delivered an additional notice alleging deficiencies in certain ties produced in the Company’s Tucson and Spokane locations and other claimed material breaches which the Company contends are unfounded. The Company again responded to UPRR that it was not in material breach of the amended 2005 supply agreement relating to warranty tie replacements and that the ties in question complied with the specifications provided by UPRR.

On June 16 and 17, 2015, UPRR issued formal notice of the termination of the concrete tie supply agreement as well as the termination of the lease agreement at the Tucson, AZ production facility and rejection and revocation of its prior acceptance of certain ties manufactured at the Company’s Spokane, WA production facility. Since that time, UPRR has discontinued submitting purchase orders to the Company for shipment of warranty replacement ties.

 

22


Table of Contents

On May 29, 2015, the Company and CXT filed an Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims in response to the Complaint, denying liability to UPRR. As a result of UPRR’s subsequent June 16-17, 2015 actions and certain related conduct, the Company on October 5, 2015 amended the pending Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to add, among other things, assertions that UPRR’s conduct in question was wrongful and unjustified and constituted additional grounds for the affirmative defenses to UPRR’s claims and also for the Company’s counterclaims.

2016

By Scheduling Order dated June 29, 2016, an August 31, 2017 deadline for the completion of fact discovery has been established and trial may proceed at some future date after October 30, 2017, and UPRR has filed an amended notice of trial to commence on October 30, 2017. During the first nine months of 2016, the parties continued to conduct discovery. The Company intends to continue to engage in discussions in an effort to resolve the UPRR matter. However, we cannot predict that such discussions will be successful, or that the results of the litigation with UPRR, or any settlement or judgment amounts, will reasonably approximate our estimated accruals for loss contingencies. Future potential costs pertaining to UPRR’s claims and the outcome of the UPRR litigation could result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

As a result of the preliminary status of the litigation and the uncertainty of any potential judgment, an estimate of any additional loss, or a range of loss, associated with this litigation cannot be made based upon currently available information.

Environmental and Legal Proceedings

In September 2015, the Company was notified of a collective action complaint by current and former test and inspection services employees to recover unpaid overtime wages and other damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The parties commenced court ordered mediation on October 17, 2016. The Company has engaged a third party specialist to assist in claim valuation, but the parties have not engaged in any discovery to date, and there is no certainty of a potential resolution at this time. An estimate of any range of potential loss associated with this claim cannot be made based upon currently available information.

The Company is subject to national, state, foreign, provincial, and/or local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. The Company’s efforts to comply with environmental regulations may have an adverse effect on its future earnings. In the opinion of management, compliance with the present environmental protection laws will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, competitive position, or capital expenditures of the Company.

At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company maintained environmental reserves approximating $6,587 and $6,640, respectively. The following table sets forth the Company’s environmental obligation:

 

     Environmental liability  

Balance at December 31, 2015

   $ 6,640   

Additions to environmental obligations

     26   

Environmental obligations utilized

     (79
  

 

 

 

Balance at September 30, 2016

   $ 6,587   
  

 

 

 

The Company is also subject to other legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. The amounts currently reserved are immaterial to our financial position and liquidity and the estimate of additional loss exposure is immaterial to our results of operations.

15. INCOME TAXES

The Company’s effective income tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was 36.1% and 29.5%, respectively, and 18.2% and 14.3% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate for the 2016 periods differed from the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the discrete impact of current year asset impairments. The Company’s asset impairments of $6,946 and $135,884 for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016, respectively, were related to both tax deductible and nondeductible assets and resulted in income tax benefits of $1,000 and $39,038, respectively.

 

23


Table of Contents

16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Due to the continued weakness in the markets that we serve, during the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company estimates severance charges of approximately $1,000 will be recorded related to reduction in force activity as the Company continues to react to changes in market conditions.

On November 7, 2016, L. B. Foster Company (the “Company”), its domestic subsidiaries, and certain of its Canadian subsidiaries entered into the Second Amendment (the “Second Amendment”) to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 13, 2015 and as amended by the First Amendment dated June 29, 2016 (the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”), with PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company. This Second Amendment modifies the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement which had a maximum revolving credit line of $275,000. The Second Amendment reduces the permitted revolving credit borrowings to $195,000 and provides for additional term loan borrowing of up to $30,000. The term loan will be subject to quarterly straight line amortization until fully paid off upon the final payment on January 1, 2020. Furthermore, certain matters, including excess cash flow, asset sales, and equity issuances, trigger mandatory prepayments to the Term Loan. Term loan borrowings will not be available to draw upon once they have been repaid. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Second Amendment or Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as applicable.

The Second Amendment further provides for modifications to the financial covenants as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Second Amendment calls for the elimination of the Maximum Leverage Ratio covenant through the quarter ended June 30, 2018. After that period, the Maximum Gross Leverage Ratio covenant will be reinstated to require a maximum ratio of 4.25 Consolidated Indebtedness to 1.00 Gross Leverage for the quarter ended September 30, 2018, and 3.75 to 1.00 for all periods thereafter until the maturity date of the credit facility. The Second Amendment also includes a Minimum Last Twelve Months EBITDA covenant (“Minimum EBITDA”). For the quarter ending December 31, 2016 through the quarter ending June 30, 2017, the Minimum EBITDA must be at least $18,500. For each quarter thereafter, through the quarter ended June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA requirement will increase by various increments. At June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA requirement will be $31,000. After the quarter ended June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA covenant will be eliminated through the maturity of the credit agreement. The Second Amendment also includes a Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenant. The covenant represents the ratio of the Company’s fixed charges to the last twelve months of EBITDA, and is required to be a minimum of 1.00 to 1.00 through the quarter ended December 31, 2017 and 1.25 to 1.00 for each quarter thereafter through the maturity of the credit facility. The final financial covenant included in the Second Amendment is a Minimum Liquidity covenant which calls for a minimum of $25,000 in undrawn availability on the revolving credit loan at all times through the quarter ended June 30, 2018.

The Second Amendment includes several changes to certain non-financial covenants as defined in the Credit Agreement. Through the maturity date of the loan, the Company is now prohibited from making any future acquisitions. The limitation on permitted annual distributions of dividends or redemptions of the Company’s stock has been decreased from $4,000 to $1,700. The aggregate limitation on loans to and investments in non-loan parties was decreased from $10,000 to $5,000. Furthermore, the limitation on asset sales has been decreased from $25,000 annually with a carryover of up to $15,000 from the prior year to $25,000 in the aggregate through the maturity date of the credit facility.

The Second Amendment provides for the elimination of the three lowest tiers of the pricing grid that had previously been defined in the First Amendment. Upon execution of the Second Amendment through the quarter ended March 31, 2018, the Company will be locked into the highest tier of the pricing grid which provides for pricing of the prime rate plus 225 basis points on base rate loans and the applicable LIBOR rate plus 325 basis points on euro rate loans. For each quarter after March 31, 2018 and through the maturity date of the credit facility, the Company’s position on the pricing grid will be governed by a Minimum Net Leverage ratio which is the ratio of Consolidated Indebtedness less cash on hand in excess of $15,000 to EBITDA. If, after March 31, 2018 the Minimum Net Leverage ratio positions the Company on the lowest tier of the pricing grid, pricing will be the prime rate plus 150 basis points on base rate loans or the applicable LIBOR rate plus 250 basis points on euro rate loans.

The Company anticipates a fourth quarter 2016 charge of approximately $500 related to the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees as a result of the amendment.

Lastly, on November 7, 2016, the Company announced that its Board of Directors decided to suspend the quarterly dividend beginning in the fourth quarter 2016.

Management evaluated all other activity of the Company and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements or further disclosure in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

24


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Many of the forward-looking statements are located in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Forward-looking statements provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact. Sentences containing words such as “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “may,” “expect,” “should,” “could,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “predict,” “project,” or their negatives, or other similar expressions generally should be considered forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may concern, among other things, L.B. Foster Company’s (“the Company’s”) expectations relating to our strategy, goals, projections and plans regarding our financial position, liquidity, capital resources and results of operations, the outcome of litigation and product warranty claims, decisions regarding our strategic growth initiatives, market position, and product development, all of which are based on current estimates that involve inherent risks and uncertainties. The Company cautions readers that various factors could cause the actual results of the Company to differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking statements. Accordingly, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. Among the factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements are risks and uncertainties related to: an economic slowdown or a continuation of the current economic slowdown in the markets we serve, the risk of doing business in international markets, a decrease in freight or passenger rail traffic, continued and sustained declines in energy prices, a lack of state or federal funding for new infrastructure projects, an increase in manufacturing or material costs, our ability to effectuate our strategy including evaluating potential opportunities such as strategic acquisitions, joint ventures, and other initiatives, and our ability to effectively integrate new businesses and realize anticipated benefits, costs of and impacts associated with shareholder activism, the timeliness and availability of material from major suppliers, labor disputes, the impact of competition, the effective implementation of an enterprise resource planning system, variances in current accounting estimates and assumptions and their ultimate outcomes, the seasonality of the Company’s business, the adequacy of internal and external sources of funds to meet financing needs, the Company’s ability to curb its working capital requirements and manage indebtedness, domestic and international income taxes, foreign currency fluctuations, inflation, economic conditions and regulatory changes caused by the United Kingdom’s likely exit from the European Union, the ultimate number of concrete ties that will have to be replaced pursuant to product warranty claims, an overall resolution of the related contract claims, the costs associated with and the outcome of a lawsuit filed by Union Pacific Railroad (“UPRR”), the loss of future revenues from current customers, risks inherent in litigation, and domestic and foreign governmental regulations. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements prove incorrect, actual outcomes could vary materially from those indicated. The risks and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance, and results of the Company’s business and forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those set forth under Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and our other periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The forward-looking statements in this report are made as of the date of this report and we assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments, or otherwise, except as required by securities laws.

General Overview

L.B. Foster Company (“Company”) is a leading manufacturer, fabricator, and distributor of products and services for rail, construction, energy, and utility markets. The Company is comprised of three business segments: Rail Products and Services, Construction Products, and Tubular and Energy Services.

Quarter-to-date Results

The segment gross profit measures presented within the MD&A tables constitute non-GAAP financial measures disclosed by management to provide investors and other users information to evaluate the performance of the Company’s segments on a more comparable basis to market trends and peers. In addition, these non-GAAP financial measures are key metrics utilized by segment managers to monitor selling prices and quantities as well as production and service costs to better evaluate key profitability drivers and trends that may develop due to industry and competitive conditions.

 

25


Table of Contents

The following non-GAAP reconciliation of segment gross profit displays items that have been excluded from segment profit (loss) as disclosed in Note 2 to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented above:

 

Three months ended September 30, 2016

   Rail Products and
Services
     Construction
Products
     Tubular and Energy
Services
     Total  

Non-GAAP Segment Gross Profit

   $ 12,220      $ 6,177      $ 654      $ 19,051  

Segment and Allocated Selling & Administrative

     8,926        4,783        4,290        17,999  

Amortization Expense

     958        38        767        1,763  

Asset Impairments

     4,383        —           2,563        6,946  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Reportable Segment Profit (Loss)

   $ (2,047    $ 1,356      $ (6,966    $ (7,657
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Three months ended September 30, 2015

   Rail Products and
Services
     Construction
Products
     Tubular and Energy
Services
     Total  

Non-GAAP Segment Gross Profit

   $ 19,564      $ 9,850      $ 6,689      $ 36,103  

Segment and Allocated Selling & Administrative

     11,510        5,356        3,996        20,862  

Amortization Expense

     1,070        38        2,229        3,337  

Asset Impairments

     —           —           80,337        80,337  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Reportable Segment Profit (Loss)

   $ 6,984      $ 4,456      $ (79,873    $ (68,433
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

                Percent of Total Net Sales     Percent
Increase/
(Decrease)
 
    Three Months Ended     Three Months Ended    
    September 30,     September 30,    
     2016     2015     2016     2015     2016 vs. 2015  

Net Sales:

         

Rail Products and Services

  $ 56,891     $ 87,972       49.6      50.0      (35.3 )% 

Construction Products

    34,870       54,093       30.4       30.7       (35.5

Tubular and Energy Services

    22,883       33,994       20.0       19.3       (32.7
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total net sales

  $ 114,644     $ 176,059       100.0      100.0      (34.9 )% 
 

 

 

   

 

 

       
               

Non-GAAP / Reported

Gross Profit Percentage

    Percent
Increase/
(Decrease)
 
    Three Months Ended     Three Months Ended    
    September 30,     September 30,    
     2016     2015     2016     2015     2016 vs. 2015  

Gross Profit:

         

Non-GAAP Rail Products and Services

  $ 12,220     $ 19,564       21.5      22.2      (37.5 )% 

Non-GAAP Construction Products

    6,177       9,850       17.7       18.2       (37.3

Non-GAAP Tubular and Energy Services

    654       6,689       2.9       19.7       (90.2
 

 

 

   

 

 

       

Non-GAAP Segment gross profit

    19,051       36,103        

LIFO income

    917       181       0.8       0.1       *

Other

    (165     (246     (0.1     (0.1     (32.9
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total gross profit

  $ 19,803     $ 36,038       17.3      20.5      (45.0 )% 
 

 

 

   

 

 

       
                Percent of Total Net     Percent
Increase/
(Decrease)
 
    Three Months Ended     Sales Three Months    
    September 30,     Ended September 30,    
     2016     2015     2016     2015     2016 vs. 2015  

Expenses:

         

Selling and administrative expenses

  $ 19,807     $ 21,605       17.3      12.3      (8.3 )% 

Amortization expense

    1,763       3,337       1.5       1.9       (47.2

Asset impairments

    6,946       80,337       6.1       45.6       (91.4

Interest expense

    1,520       1,265       1.3       0.7       20.2  

Interest income

    (50     (66     —          —          (24.2

Equity in loss of nonconsolidated investments

    263       299       0.2       0.2       (12.0

Other income

    (1,085     (537     (0.9     (0.3     102.0  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total expenses

  $ 29,164     $ 106,240       25.4      60.3      (72.5 )% 
 

 

 

   

 

 

       

Loss before income taxes

  $ (9,361   $ (70,202     (8.2 )%      (39.9 )%      (86.7 )% 

Income tax benefit

    (3,379     (12,780     (2.9     (7.3     (73.6
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loss

  $ (5,982   $ (57,422     (5.3 )%      (32.6 )%      (89.6 )% 
 

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

** Results of calculation are not considered meaningful for presentation purposes.

 

26


Table of Contents

Third Quarter 2016 Compared to Third Quarter 2015 – Company Analysis

Net sales of $114,644 for the period ended September 30, 2016 decreased by $61,415, or 34.9%, compared to the prior year quarter. The change was attributable to decreases of 35.5%, 35.3%, and 32.7% in Construction Products, Rail Products and Services, and Tubular and Energy Services segment sales, respectively.

Gross profit percentage for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 was 17.3% or 320 basis points lower than the prior year quarter. The decrease was primarily due to significantly lower margins within the Tubular and Energy Services segment. Partially offsetting the decline were favorable reductions in LIFO reserves as a result of decreasing prices along with inventory reductions.

Selling and administrative expenses decreased by $1,798, or 8.3%, from the prior year. The decrease was primarily driven by $830 in cost reduction initiatives related to personnel and travel costs, $700 related to incentive compensation, $320 related to prior year acquisition and integration costs and other strategic spending reductions of approximately $850. These reductions were partially offset by $640 of increased litigation-related costs for the UPRR matter and, to a lesser extent, increased costs related to the implementation of the Company’s enterprise resource planning system.

The Company recorded non-cash impairments of $6,946 ($5,946 net of tax) during the three-month period ended September 30, 2016. The impairment related to the finalization of the June 1, 2016 interim impairment assessment. The third quarter adjustments related to a $4,383 goodwill impairment and a $2,563 definite-lived asset impairment for the Rail Technologies and Chemtec reporting units, respectively. During the three-month period ended September 30, 2015, the Company recognized asset impairments of $80,337 ($63,887 net of taxes) to write down the carrying values to the implied fair values, of which $69,908 represented the full carrying value of goodwill related to the IOS acquisition and the remaining $10,429 related to the Chemtec reporting unit.

Amortization expense decreased by $1,574, or 47.2%, which was attributable to the current year intangible asset impairment, which reduced definite-lived intangible amortization costs.

The Company’s effective income tax rate in the 2016 third quarter was 36.1%, compared to 18.2% in the prior year quarter. The Company’s effective income tax rate for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 differed from the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the discrete impact of asset impairments, offset by changes in the Company’s forecasted global mix of income. The Company’s asset impairments of $6,946 and $80,337 in the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, were related to both tax deductible and nondeductible assets and resulted in income tax benefits of $1,000 and $16,450, respectively.

Net loss for the third quarter of 2016 was $5,982, or $0.58 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $57,422, or $5.60 per diluted share, in the prior year quarter. The following table provides a reconciliation of the GAAP earnings per share value to the non-GAAP adjusted earnings1 per share value for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:

 

     Three Months Ended  
     September 30,  
     2016      2015  

Adjusted Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Share Reconciliation

     

Net loss, as reported

   $ (5,982    $ (57,422

Asset impairments, net of tax benefits of $1,000 and $16,450

     5,946        63,887  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Adjusted net (loss) income

     (36      6,465  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Average number of common shares outstanding - Diluted, as reported

     10,296        10,256  

Average number of common shares outstanding - Diluted, as adjusted

     10,296        10,304  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Diluted loss per common share, as reported

   $ (0.58    $ (5.60
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Diluted (loss) earnings per common share, as adjusted

   $ (0.00    $ 0.63  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

1

- All results in this Quarterly Report that exclude asset impairment charges are non-GAAP measures used for management reporting purposes. Management believes that these measures provide useful information to investors because they will assist investors in evaluating earnings performance on a comparable year-over-year basis.

 

27


Table of Contents

Results of Operations – Segment Analysis

Rail Products and Services

 

     Three Months Ended           Percent  
     September 30,     Decrease             Decrease          
     2016     2015     2016 vs. 2015     2016 vs. 2015  

Net Sales

   $   56,891     $   87,972     $ (31,081     (35.3 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP Gross Profit

   $ 12,220     $ 19,564     $ (7,344     (37.5 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP Gross Profit Percentage

     21.5     22.2     (0.7 )%      (3.2 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Third Quarter 2016 Compared to Third Quarter 2015

Rail Products and Services segment sales decreased $31,081 or 35.3%, compared to the prior year period. The decline related to reductions across all of our rail divisions. The sales declines were primarily volume driven due to significantly less infrastructure and maintenance spending. The rail market continues to experience reductions in commodity carloadings and intermodal rail traffic among the Class 1 railroads. This negative trend is expected to continue throughout the remainder of the year.

The Rail Products and Services segment produced a loss of $2,047 compared to the prior year period profit of $6,984. The decrease was primarily attributable to a $4,383 goodwill impairment related to the Rail Technologies reporting unit along with reductions in gross profit due to depressed volumes. Non-GAAP gross profit declined by $7,344, or 37.5%, compared to the prior year period. The decline in profitability was primarily attributable to volume related deleveraging within track components and friction management products.

During the quarter, the Rail Products and Services segment had a reduction in new orders of 22.5% compared to the prior year period. Nearly half of the decline related to the rail distribution division and the remainder consisted of all other rail product lines experiencing reductions in orders relative to the prior year quarter. The Company anticipates continued challenges as rail customers react to significantly reduced rail traffic.

Construction Products

 

     Three Months Ended     Decrease     Percent
         Decrease        
 
     September 30,      
     2016     2015     2016 vs. 2015     2016 vs. 2015  

Net Sales

   $   34,870     $   54,093     $ (19,223     (35.5 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP Gross Profit

   $ 6,177     $ 9,850     $ (3,673     (37.3 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP Gross Profit Percentage

     17.7     18.2     (0.5 )%      (2.7 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Third Quarter 2016 Compared to Third Quarter 2015

Construction Products segment sales decreased $19,223, or 35.5%, compared to the prior year period. The reduction relates to weaker sales within piling and bridge products, partially offset by increased sales of precast concrete products. The piling products division continues to experience increased competition, which has led to a deterioration in demand and related sales volumes. The fabricated bridge division anticipates stronger sales during the fourth quarter as projects awarded during the second quarter 2016 will become realized.

The Construction Products segment profit declined by $3,100 which was primarily attributable to the reduction in sales volumes which negatively impacted non-GAAP gross profit. Non-GAAP gross profit was weaker in all divisions and related to sales volume reductions in the current year period.

During the quarter, the Construction Products segment’s orders were consistent with the prior year period.

 

28


Table of Contents

Tubular and Energy Services

 

     Three Months Ended           Percent  
     September 30,     Decrease             Decrease          
     2016     2015     2016 vs. 2015     2016 vs. 2015  

Net Sales

   $   22,883     $   33,994     $ (11,111     (32.7 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP Gross Profit

   $ 654     $ 6,689     $ (6,035     (90.2 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP Gross Profit Percentage

     2.9      19.7      (16.8 )%      (85.3 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Third Quarter 2016 Compared to Third Quarter 2015

Tubular and Energy Services segment sales decreased $11,111, or 32.7%, compared to the prior year period. The decrease related primarily to $8,382 from the threaded and coated divisions and $6,225 from test and inspection services partially offset by an increase of $3,585 related to precision measurement products.

Tubular and Energy Services segment loss was $6,966 compared to a loss of $79,873 in the prior year. The losses were largely attributable to impairments of $2,563 and $80,337 for the three-month periods ending September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The non-GAAP gross profit declined by $6,035, or 90.2%, which was negatively impacted by our test and inspection and coated services offerings. The test and inspection services business continues to be negatively impacted by the weakness in the upstream oil and gas market, where demand levels remain low, leading to heightened competition and reductions in service prices. Similarly, coated pipe demand levels have declined significantly during the third quarter 2016 which led to a temporary idling of the Birmingham facility. The facility has restarted operations in early October 2016. Gross profit was also negatively impacted by precision measurement system sales which produced lower margins due to competitive pressures as a result of the depressed midstream oil and gas market. Profitability in the Tubular and Energy Services segment will be challenging for the remainder of the year.

The Tubular and Energy Services segment had a reduction in new orders of 52.2% compared to the prior year period. Orders for coated products, test and inspection services and precision measurement systems were down 64.8%, 55.1%, and 37.0% respectively, due to a reduction in midstream oil and gas new project lettings.

Year-to-date Results

The segment gross profit measures presented within the MD&A tables constitute non-GAAP financial measures disclosed by management to provide investors and other users information to evaluate the performance of the Company’s segments on a more comparable basis to market trends and peers. In addition, these non-GAAP financial measures are key metrics utilized by segment managers to monitor selling prices and quantities as well as production and service costs to better evaluate key profitability drivers and trends that may develop due to industry and competitive conditions.

 

29


Table of Contents

The following non-GAAP reconciliations of segment gross profit displays items that have been excluded from segment profit (loss) as disclosed in Note 2:

 

Nine months ended September 30, 2016

   Rail Products and
Services
     Construction
Products
     Tubular and Energy
Services
     Total  

Non-GAAP Segment Gross Profit

   $ 41,051      $ 20,642      $ 8,933      $ 70,626  

Segment and Allocated Selling & Administrative

     31,854        14,781        12,891        59,526  

Amortization Expense

     2,946        113        4,759        7,818  

Asset Impairments

     32,725        —           103,159        135,884  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Reportable Segment Profit (Loss)

   $ (26,474    $ 5,748      $ (111,876    $ (132,602
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Nine months ended September 30, 2015

   Rail Products and
Services
     Construction
Products
     Tubular and Energy
Services
     Total  

Non-GAAP Segment Gross Profit

   $ 57,418      $ 26,707      $ 19,617      $ 103,742  

Segment and Allocated Selling & Administrative

     34,944        15,660        11,097        61,701  

Amortization Expense

     3,005        205        5,740        8,950  

Asset Impairments

     —           —           80,337        80,337  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Reportable Segment Profit (Loss)

   $ 19,469      $ 10,842      $ (77,557    $ (47,246
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

    Nine Months Ended
September 30,
    Percent of Total Net Sales
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
    Percent
Increase/(Decrease)
 
     2016     2015     2016     2015     2016 vs. 2015  

Net Sales:

         

Rail Products and Services

  $ 188,686     $ 252,530       50.1      52.0      (25.3 )% 

Construction Products

    107,098       137,899       28.4       28.4       (22.3

Tubular and Energy Services

    81,164       94,956       21.5       19.6       (14.5
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total net sales

  $ 376,948     $ 485,385       100.0      100.0      (22.3 )% 
 

 

 

   

 

 

       
    Nine Months Ended
September 30,
    Non-GAAP / Reported
Gross Profit Percentage
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
    Percent
Increase/(Decrease)
 
    2016     2015     2016     2015     2016 vs. 2015  

Gross Profit:

         

Non-GAAP Rail Products and Services

  $ 41,051     $ 57,418       21.8      22.7      (28.5 )% 

Non-GAAP Construction Products

    20,642       26,707       19.3       19.4       (22.7

Non-GAAP Tubular and Energy Services

    8,933       19,617       11.0       20.7       (54.5
 

 

 

   

 

 

       

Non-GAAP Segment gross profit

    70,626       103,742        

LIFO income

    1,442       581       0.4       0.1       148.2  

Other

    (492     (542     (0.1     (0.1     (9.2
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total gross profit

  $ 71,576     $ 103,781       19.0      21.4      (31.0 )% 
 

 

 

   

 

 

       
    Nine Months Ended
September 30,
    Percent of Total Net
Sales Nine Months
Ended September 30,
    Percent
Increase/(Decrease)
 
    2016     2015     2016     2015     2016 vs. 2015  

Expenses:

         

Selling and administrative expenses

  $ 65,941     $ 68,133       17.5      14.0      (3.2 )% 

Amortization expense

    7,818       8,950       2.1       1.8       (12.6

Asset impairments

    135,884       80,337       36.0       16.6       69.1  

Interest expense

    4,342       3,166       1.2       0.7       37.1  

Interest income

    (157     (160     —          —          (1.9

Equity in loss of nonconsolidated investments

    946       312       0.3       0.1       *

Other income

    (263     (1,245     (0.1     (0.3     (78.9
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total expenses

  $ 214,511     $ 159,493       56.9      32.9      34.5
 

 

 

   

 

 

       

Loss before income taxes

  $ (142,935   $ (55,712     (37.9 ) %      (11.5 ) %      156.6

Income tax benefit

    (42,125     (7,939     (11.2     (1.6     *
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Net loss

  $ (100,810   $ (47,773     (26.7 ) %      (9.9 ) %      111.0
 

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

** Results of calculation are not considered meaningful for presentation purposes.

 

30


Table of Contents

First Nine Months of 2016 Compared to First Nine Months of 2015 – Company Analysis

Net sales of $376,948 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 decreased by $108,437, or 22.3%, compared to the prior year period. The sales decrease was attributable to decreases of 25.3%, 22.3%, and 14.5% in Rail Products and Services, Construction Products and Tubular and Energy Services segment sales, respectively.

Gross profit percentage for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was 19.0%, or 240 basis points lower than the prior year. The current year margin was significantly impacted by the prolonged weakness in the oil and gas market and, to a lesser extent, reduced activity within the rail market. Partially offsetting the decline were favorable reductions in LIFO reserves as a result of decreasing prices along with inventory reductions.

Selling and administrative expenses decreased by $2,192 over the prior year period. The reduction was primarily attributable to cost reduction initiatives related to personnel costs of $1,100, incentive compensation reductions of $1,700, prior year acquisition and integration costs of $1,000 and other strategic spending reductions of $1,660 which were partially offset by $2,400 in litigation-related costs for the UPRR matter and, to a lesser extent, costs related to the implementation of the Company’s enterprise resource planning system.

The Company recorded non-cash asset impairments of $135,884 ($96,846 net of tax) during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016. During the 2015 period, the Company recognized asset impairments of $80,337 ($63,887 net of taxes) to write down the carrying values to the implied fair values, of which $69,908 represented the full carrying value of goodwill related to the IOS acquisition and the remaining $10,429 related to the Chemtec reporting unit.

During the second quarter of 2016, the Company identified various indicators that suggested that there was a more likely than not probability that the carrying values of certain assets and reporting units were less than their respective fair values. The impairment indicators included a rapid deterioration in actual performance against forecasts, downward revisions in projected financial results, declines in the Company’s market capitalization, and reductions in new order activity.

Asset groups that had indicators of impairment were analyzed to determine if the carrying values were recoverable. Based upon the recoverability assessment, the Company determined that certain intangible assets and property, plant, and equipment within the test and inspection services division and certain intangible assets within the Chemtec division were impaired. The impairment assessment was finalized during the period ended September 30, 2016 resulting in a $59,786 definite-lived intangible asset impairment and a $14,956 property, plant, and equipment impairment were recorded within the Tubular and Energy Services segment. The remaining asset groups tested for recoverability were substantially in excess of their respective carrying values.

The Company performed an interim goodwill impairment review as of June 1, 2016 as a result of the adverse effect on certain reporting units of reduced capital spending and cost reduction priorities that oil and gas developers and railroad customers have enacted as well as the indicators previously noted. The forecasts for the Chemtec, coated services, and Rail Technologies reporting units did not indicate a timely recovery to support the carrying values of the reporting units. Upon finalization of the interim impairment assessment during the period ended September 30, 2016, the Company recognized a goodwill impairment of $61,142, which represented the full impairment of goodwill related to the Chemtec and coated services reporting units and approximately 68% of the Rail Technologies goodwill value. The estimated fair values of the remaining reporting units were substantially in excess of the carrying value of those reporting units.

The Company’s effective income tax rate from continuing operations for the first nine months of 2016 was 29.5%, compared to 14.3% in the prior year period. The Company’s effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 differed from the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the discrete impact of asset impairments in the current year period. The Company’s asset impairments of $135,884 and $80,337 for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, were related to both tax deductible and nondeductible assets and resulted in income tax benefits of $39,038 and $16,450, respectively.

 

31


Table of Contents

Net loss for the first nine months of 2016 was $100,810, or $9.82 per diluted share, which compares to a net loss for the 2015 period of $47,773, or $4.65 per diluted share. The following table provides a reconciliation of the GAAP earnings per share value to the non-GAAP adjusted earnings per share value for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:

 

     Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
     2016      2015  

Adjusted Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Share Reconciliation

     

Net loss, as reported

   $ (100,810    $ (47,773

Asset impairments, net of tax benefits of $39,038 and $16,450

     96,846        63,887  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Adjusted net (loss) income

     (3,964      16,114  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Average number of common shares outstanding - Diluted, as reported

     10,264        10,266  

Average number of common shares outstanding - Diluted, as adjusted

     10,264        10,347  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Diluted loss per common share, as reported

   $ (9.82    $ (4.65
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Diluted (loss) earnings per common share, as adjusted

   $ (0.39    $ 1.56  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Results of Operations – Segment Analysis

Rail Products and Services

 

     Nine Months Ended
September 30,
    Decrease     Percent
        Decrease         
 
     2016     2015     2016 vs. 2015     2016 vs. 2015  

Net Sales

   $ 188,686     $ 252,530     $ (63,844     (25.3 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP Gross Profit

   $ 41,051     $ 57,418     $ (16,367     (28.5 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP Gross Profit Percentage

     21.8     22.7     (0.9 )%      (4.0 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

First Nine Months of 2016 Compared to First Nine Months of 2015

Rail Products and Services segment sales decreased $63,844, or 25.3%, compared to the prior year period. For the first nine months of 2016, all rail divisions experienced reductions in sales over the prior year period. The sales decline was attributable to lower volumes due to continued weakness in the North American rail market in both commodity carloads as well as intermodal rail traffic. Additionally, due to the ongoing litigation with UPRR, our rail divisions experienced a decline in sales to UPRR of approximately $12,500.

The Rail Products and Services segment loss for the nine-months ended September 30, 2016 was $26,474 compared to segment profit of $19,469 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The reduction was primarily attributable to the $32,725 goodwill impairment related to the Rail Technologies reporting unit along with reductions in gross profit due to the reduction in sales volumes. The non-GAAP gross profit decreased by $16,367, or 28.5%, and the corresponding percentage decreased by 90 basis points principally attributable to declines in Rail Technologies and precast concrete tie margins, which was negatively impacted by reduced volumes and related deleveraging of the businesses.

During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016, the Rail Products and Services segment had a reduction in new orders of 28.5% compared to the prior year. The rail distribution and precast concrete tie businesses represented 60.9% of the current year decline and all other rail divisions experienced declines relative to the prior year due to reductions in rail capital spending. The Company anticipates continuing challenges as rail customers react to significantly reduced rail traffic.

 

32


Table of Contents

Construction Products

 

     Nine Months Ended
September 30,
    Decrease     Percent
Decrease
 
     2016     2015     2016 vs. 2015     2016 vs. 2015  

Net Sales

   $ 107,098     $ 137,899     $ (30,801     (22.3 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP Gross Profit

   $ 20,642     $ 26,707     $ (6,065     (22.7 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP Gross Profit Percentage

     19.3     19.4     (0.1 )%      (0.5 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

First Nine Months of 2016 Compared to First Nine Months of 2015

Construction Products segment sales decreased $30,801, or 22.3%, compared to the prior year period. The piling division represented $24,672 of the reduction and fabricated bridge sales represented $8,036, which were both attributable to fewer large project opportunities in the market as compared to the prior year period as well as increased competition leading to fewer project wins. Partially offsetting these declines were increased precast concrete product sales.

The Construction Products segment profit of $5,748 declined by $5,094 compared to the prior year as a result of reduced gross profit attributable to lower sales volumes. The non-GAAP gross profit decreased by $6,065, or 22.7%, due to reductions in piling products gross profit as a result of the decline in volumes. The fabricated bridge and precast concrete products partially offset the reduction in piling products’ profit margins.

During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016, the Construction Products segment had a 1.3% increase in new orders compared to the prior year period. The increase relates to significant project wins within the fabricated bridge business, which were largely offset by declines in the piling products business.

Tubular and Energy Services

 

     Nine Months Ended
September 30,
    Decrease     Percent
Decrease
 
     2016     2015     2016 vs. 2015     2016 vs. 2015  

Net Sales

   $ 81,164     $ 94,956     $ (13,792     (14.5 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP Gross Profit

   $ 8,933     $ 19,617     $ (10,684     (54.5 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP Gross Profit Percentage

     11.0     20.7     (9.7 )%      (46.9 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

First Nine Months of 2016 Compared to First Nine Months of 2015

Tubular and Energy Services segment sales decreased $13,792, or 14.5%, compared to the prior year period. The decrease primarily relates to the test and inspection services division, which is being significantly impacted by the upstream oil and gas market and related reduction in active land rigs. Sales of coated services have declined by 25.5% due to reduced demand levels within the midstream oil and gas market.

For the nine-months ended September 30, 2016, the segment loss was $111,871 compared to segment loss of $77,557 during the prior year period. The losses in both periods were largely attributable to asset impairments of $103,159 and $80,337, respectively. The current year impairments related to the test and inspection services, precision measurement products, and coated services reporting units. Segment profit was also negatively impacted by reductions in gross profit due to continued declines in test and inspection services sales volumes. The non-GAAP gross profit declined by $10,684, or 54.5%, and the corresponding percentage declined by 970 basis points compared to the prior year period. Sales of precision measurement products have increased during the current year, however, due to the increased competition on fewer opportunities, the profitability has been reduced.

The Tubular and Energy Services segment’s new orders decreased by 36.8% compared to the prior year period. Coated services and test and inspection services experienced the most significant reductions at 67.5% and 49.3%, respectively. While the test and inspection services division continues to be impacted by the weakness in the oil and gas market, the recent coated decline relates to the delayed impact of the oil and gas market on mid-stream customers. Management anticipates that the Tubular and Energy Services segment will continue to face significant headwinds throughout the remainder of 2016.

 

33


Table of Contents

Other

Segment Backlog

Total Company backlog is summarized by business segment in the following table for the periods indicated:

 

     Backlog  
     September 30,
2016
     December 31,
2015
     September 30,
2015
 

Rail Products and Services

   $ 53,392       $ 85,199       $ 84,787   

Construction Products

     75,762         45,371         63,311   

Tubular and Energy Services

     14,650         34,137         26,242   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Backlog

   $ 143,804       $ 164,707       $ 174,340   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

While a considerable portion of our business is backlog driven, certain product lines within the Rail Products and Services and Tubular and Energy Services segments are not driven by backlog and therefore have insignificant levels throughout the year.

Warranty

At September 30, 2016, the Company maintained a total product warranty reserve of $9,034 for its estimate of all potential product warranty claims. Of this total, $7,460 reflects the current estimate of the Company’s exposure for potential product warranty claims related to concrete tie production. While the Company believes this is a reasonable estimate of its potential contingencies related to identified concrete tie warranty matters, the Company may incur future charges associated with new customer claims or further development of information for existing customer claims. Thus, there can be no assurance that future potential costs pertaining to warranty claims will not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. See Note 14 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Total debt was $135,625 and $168,754 at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Our need for liquidity relates primarily to working capital requirements for operations, capital expenditures, joint venture capital obligations, debt service obligations, share repurchases, and dividends.

The change in cash and cash equivalents for year-to-date periods ended September 30 is as follows:

 

     September 30,  
     2016      2015  

Net cash provided by operating activities

   $ 11,876       $ 13,688   

Net cash used by investing activities

     (6,219      (205,161

Net cash (used) provided by financing activities

     (35,470      175,744   

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

     152         (3,085
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

   $ (29,661    $ (18,814
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Cash Flow from Operating Activities

During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016, cash flows provided by operating activities were $11,876 compared to $13,688 during the prior year period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, income, adjustments to income from operating activities, and dividends from the LB Pipe joint venture provided $15,976 compared to $36,446 in the 2015 period. Working capital and other assets and liabilities used $4,100 in the current period compared to a use of $22,758 in the prior year period.

The Company’s calculation of days sales outstanding at September 30, 2016 was 53 days compared to 56 days at December 31, 2015. We believe our receivables portfolio is strong.

 

34


Table of Contents

Cash Flow from Investing Activities

Capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 were $6,507 and $11,618, respectively. The current year expenditures related primarily to the Birmingham, AL inside diameter coating line upgrade and application development of the Company’s new enterprise resource planning system. The Company also received proceeds of $923 related to the sale of assets and also loaned $635 to its LB Pipe JV. Expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 related primarily to upgrades to the outside diameter coating line of the Birmingham, AL coating facility as well as general plant and yard improvements across each segment. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company acquired Tew Holdings, LTD. (“Tew”) and IOS. The total purchase price of these acquisitions, net of cash acquired, was $193,871 as of September 30, 2015.

Cash Flow from Financing Activities

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company had a decrease in outstanding debt of approximately $33,130, primarily related to short-term loans from foreign subsidiaries to make payments against the revolving credit facility. The advances were repaid during the first week of October 2016. The Company also paid $712 in financing fees for the June 29, 2016 credit facility amendment. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company had an increase in outstanding debt of approximately $180,990, primarily related to drawings against the revolving credit facility to fund domestic acquisition activity. The Company withheld 14,498 shares for approximately $198 for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016 compared to withholding 24,012 shares for approximately $1,099 in the prior year period. The shares were withheld from employees to pay their withholding taxes in connection with the vesting of restricted stock awards. Cash outflows related to dividends were $1,244 in each of the periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Lastly, during the nine-month periods ending September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company purchased 5,000 and 80,512 shares of common stock for $67 and $1,587, respectively, under our existing share repurchase authorization.

Financial Condition

On November 7, 2016, L. B. Foster Company (the “Company”), its domestic subsidiaries, and certain of its Canadian subsidiaries entered into the Second Amendment (the “Second Amendment”) to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 13, 2015 and as amended by the First Amendment dated June 29, 2016 (the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”), with PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company. This Second Amendment modifies the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement which had a maximum revolving credit line of $275,000. The Second Amendment reduces the permitted revolving credit borrowings to $195,000 and provides for additional term loan borrowing of up to $30,000. The term loan will be subject to quarterly straight line amortization until fully paid off upon the final payment on January 1, 2020. Furthermore, certain matters, including excess cash flow, asset sales, and equity issuances, trigger mandatory prepayments to the Term Loan. Term loan borrowings will not be available to draw upon once they have been repaid. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Second Amendment or Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as applicable.

The Second Amendment further provides for modifications to the financial covenants as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Second Amendment calls for the elimination of the Maximum Leverage Ratio covenant through the quarter ended June 30, 2018. After that period, the Maximum Gross Leverage Ratio covenant will be reinstated to require a maximum ratio of 4.25 Consolidated Indebtedness to 1.00 Gross Leverage for the quarter ended September 30, 2018, and 3.75 to 1.00 for all periods thereafter until the maturity date of the credit facility. The Second Amendment also includes a Minimum Last Twelve Months EBITDA covenant (“Minimum EBITDA”). For the quarter ending December 31, 2016 through the quarter ending June 30, 2017, the Minimum EBITDA must be at least $18,500. For each quarter thereafter, through the quarter ended June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA requirement will increase by various increments. At June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA requirement will be $31,000. After the quarter ended June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA covenant will be eliminated through the maturity of the credit agreement. The Second Amendment also includes a Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenant. The covenant represents the ratio of the Company’s fixed charges to the last twelve months of EBITDA, and is required to be a minimum of 1.00 to 1.00 through the quarter ended December 31, 2017 and 1.25 to 1.00 for each quarter thereafter through the maturity of the credit facility. The final financial covenant included in the Second Amendment is a Minimum Liquidity covenant which calls for a minimum of $25,000 in undrawn availability on the revolving credit loan at all times through the quarter ended June 30, 2018.

The Second Amendment includes several changes to certain non-financial covenants as defined in the Credit Agreement. Through the maturity date of the loan, the Company is now prohibited from making any future acquisitions. The limitation on permitted annual distributions of dividends or redemptions of the Company’s stock has been decreased from $4,000 to $1,700. The aggregate limitation on loans to and investments in non-loan parties was decreased from $10,000 to $5,000. Furthermore, the limitation on asset sales has been decreased from $25,000 annually with a carryover of up to $15,000 from the prior year to $25,000 in the aggregate through the maturity date of the credit facility.

 

35


Table of Contents

The Second Amendment provides for the elimination of the three lowest tiers of the pricing grid that had previously been defined in the First Amendment. Upon execution of the Second Amendment through the quarter ended March 31, 2018, the Company will be locked into the highest tier of the pricing grid which provides for pricing of the prime rate plus 225 basis points on base rate loans and the applicable LIBOR rate plus 325 basis points on euro rate loans. For each quarter after March 31, 2018 and through the maturity date of the credit facility, the Company’s position on the pricing grid will be governed by a Minimum Net Leverage ratio which is the ratio of Consolidated Indebtedness less cash on hand in excess of $15,000 to EBITDA. If, after March 31, 2018 the Minimum Net Leverage ratio positions the Company on the lowest tier of the pricing grid, pricing will be the prime rate plus 150 basis points on base rate loans or the applicable LIBOR rate plus 250 basis points on euro rate loans.

At September 30, 2016, we had $3,651 in cash and cash equivalents and $141,728 of availability under the First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement while carrying $135,625 in total debt. Under the November 3, 2016 Second Amendment, we would have had $91,728 of borrowing availability. We believe this liquidity will provide the flexibility to operate the business in a prudent manner, continue to service our revolving debt facility, and weather a continued downturn in our markets.

Our cash balances are held in various locations throughout the world, with substantially all of those amounts held outside the U.S. Under current law, the foreign cash would be subject to U.S. federal income taxes less applicable foreign tax credits. We utilize planning and financing strategies to ensure that the Company’s cash is available as it is needed.

As of September 30, 2016, approximately $3,278 of our cash and cash equivalents was held in non-domestic bank accounts, and is not available to fund domestic operations unless repatriated. In addition, approximately $26,000 was subject to short-term intercompany advances into the U.S., which was used to fund our revolving credit facility at September 30, 2016. It is management’s intent to indefinitely reinvest such funds, including the short-term intercompany advances, outside of the United States.

At September 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with the covenants in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as revised by the First Amendment.

To reduce the impact of interest rate changes on outstanding variable-rate debt, the Company entered into forward starting LIBOR-based interest rate swaps with notional values totaling $50,000. The swaps will become effective in February 2017 at which point it will effectively convert a portion of the debt from variable to fixed-rate borrowings during the term of the swap contract. At September 30, 2016, the swap liability was $2,307 compared to $196 as of December 31, 2015.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. When more than one accounting principle, or method of its application, is generally accepted, management selects the principle or method that, in its opinion, is appropriate in the Company’s specific circumstances. Application of these accounting principles requires management to reach opinions regarding estimates about the future resolution of existing uncertainties. As a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. In preparing these financial statements, management has reached its opinions regarding the best estimates and judgments of the amounts and disclosures included in the financial statements giving due regard to materiality. There have been no material changes in the Company’s critical accounting policies or estimates since December 31, 2015. A summary of the Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates is included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements include operating leases, purchase obligations, and standby letters of credit. A schedule of the Company’s required payments under financial instruments and other commitments as of December 31, 2015 is included in the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. There were no material changes to these off-balance sheet arrangements during the current quarter. These arrangements provide the Company with increased flexibility relative to the utilization and investment of cash resources.

 

36


Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk

The Company is exposed to risks that increases in interest rates may adversely affect funding costs associated with its variable-rate debt. To reduce the impact of interest rate changes on a portion of this variable-rate debt, the Company entered into forward starting interest rate swap agreements which effectively convert a portion of the debt from a variable to a fixed-rate borrowing during the term of the swap contracts. Refer to Note 10 within the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” of this report for additional information regarding the swap agreements.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, a 1% change in the interest rate for variable rate debt as of September 30, 2016 would increase or decrease interest expense by approximately $1,250.

If we had paid interest for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 under the terms of the Second Amendment, the interest for that period would have been approximately $5,200. A 1% change in the interest that would have been payable under the terms of the Second Amendment would change the amount of interest expense that would have been payable under the Second Amendment by approximately $1,250.

The Company does not purchase or hold any derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. At contract inception, the Company designates its derivative instruments as hedges. The Company recognizes all derivative instruments on the balance sheet at fair value. Fluctuations in the fair values of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings within other income as the underlying hedged items affect earnings. To the extent that a change in a derivative does not perfectly offset the change in value of the interest rate being hedged, the ineffective portion is recognized in earnings immediately.

As of September 30, 2016, the Company recorded a current liability of $2,307 related to its LIBOR-based interest rate swap agreements.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

The Company is subject to exposures to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company manages its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates on firm sale and purchase commitments by entering into foreign currency forward contracts. The Company’s risk management objective is to reduce its exposure to the effects of changes in exchange rates on these transactions over the duration of the transactions. The Company did not engage in foreign currency hedging transactions during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

L.B. Foster Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of September 30, 2016. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We are in the process of integrating the IOS Holdings, Inc. and Tew Plus, Ltd. businesses. We are analyzing, evaluating and, where necessary, implementing changes in controls and procedures relating to these businesses as the integration proceeds. Similarly, as of April 1, 2016, we have transitioned certain product lines into a new enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system. As such, the integration of recent acquisitions and ERP transition have resulted in additions and changes to our internal control over financial reporting. Otherwise, there were no changes in our “internal control over financial reporting” (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2016, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

37


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

See Note 14, “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities,” of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the risk factors and other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC on March 1, 2016, as well as our quarterly reports filed thereafter, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, financial results, or future performance. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially affect our business, financial condition, and/or results of operations.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The Company’s purchases of equity securities for the three-month period ended September 30, 2016 were as follows:

 

                   Total number
of shares
     Approximate dollar  
            Average      purchased as      value of shares  
     Total number      price      part of publicly      that may yet be  
     of shares      paid per      announced plans      purchased under  
     purchased (1)      share      or programs (2)      the plans or programs  

July 1, 2016 - July 31, 2016

     —         $ —           —         $ 29,933   

August 1, 2016 - August 31, 2016

     —           —           —           29,933   

September 1, 2016 - September 30, 2016

     —           —           —           29,933   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     —         $ —           —         $ 29,933   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Shares withheld by the Company to pay taxes upon vesting of restricted stock.

 

(2) On December 9, 2015, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $30,000 of the Company’s common shares until December 31, 2017. This authorization became effective January 1, 2016.

 

  a. The $30,000 repurchase authorization is restricted under the terms of the Second Amendment. Dividends, distributions, and redemptions are capped at a maximum annual amount of $1,700 throughout the life of the repurchase authorization.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

This item is not applicable to the Company.

 

38


Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits

All exhibits are incorporated herein by reference:

 

10.1    Second Amendment dated November 7, 2016 to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 13, 2015, and as amended by the First Amendment dated June 29, 2016, among Registrant and PNC Bank N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on November 8, 2016, File No. 0-10436.
*31.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*31.2    Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*32.0    Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*101.INS    XBRL Instance Document.
*101.SCH    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
*101.CAL    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
*101.DEF    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
*101.LAB    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
*101.PRE    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

 

* Exhibits marked with an asterisk are filed herewith.

 

39


Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

      L.B. FOSTER COMPANY
      (Registrant)
Date: November 8, 2016      

By: /s/ David J. Russo

      David J. Russo
      Senior Vice President,
      Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
      (Duly Authorized Officer of Registrant)

 

40


Table of Contents

Index to Exhibits

All exhibits are incorporated herein by reference:

 

Exhibit Number

  

Description

10.1    Second Amendment dated November 7, 2016 to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 13, 2015, and as amended by the First Amendment dated June 29, 2016, among Registrant and PNC Bank N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on November 8, 2016, File No. 0-10436.
*31.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*31.2    Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*32.0    Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*101.INS    XBRL Instance Document.
*101.SCH    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
*101.CAL    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
*101.DEF    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
*101.LAB    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
*101.PRE    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

 

* Exhibits marked with an asterisk are filed herewith.

 

41