UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016

or

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number: 001-36511

 

Eclipse Resources Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

(814) 308-9754

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    ☒  Yes     ☐  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    ☒  Yes    ☐  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ☐  Yes    ☒  No

Number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding at November 4, 2016: 260,591,893 shares

 

 

 

 

---

 

ECLIPSE RESOURCES CORPORATION

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

 

2

---

 

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Quarterly Report”) contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements, other than statements of historical fact included in this Quarterly Report, regarding our strategy, future operations, financial position, estimated revenues and income or losses, projected costs and capital expenditures, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. When used in this Quarterly Report, the words “will,” “plan,” “would,” “could,” “endeavor,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying words. These forward-looking statements are or were, when made, based on our current expectations and assumptions about future events and are or were, when made, based on currently available information as to the outcome and timing of future events. When considering forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors and other cautionary statements described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 4, 2016.

Forward-looking statements may include statements about, among other things:

We caution you that these forward-looking statements are subject to all of the risks and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control, incident to the exploration for and development, production, gathering and sale of natural gas, NGLs and oil. These risks include, but are not limited to, legal and environmental risks, drilling and other operating risks, regulatory changes, commodity price volatility and the recent significant decline of the price of natural gas, NGLs and oil, inflation, lack of availability of drilling, production and processing equipment and services, counterparty credit risk, the uncertainty inherent in estimating natural gas, NGLs and oil reserves and in projecting future rates of production, cash flow and access to capital, risks associated with our level of indebtedness, the timing of development expenditures, and the other risks described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 4, 2016.

3

---

 

Reserve engineering is a process of estimating underground accumulations of natural gas, NGLs and oil that cannot be measured in an exact way. The accuracy of any reserve estimate depends on the quality of available data, the interpretation of such data and price and cost assumptions made by reserve engineers. In addition, the results of drilling, testing and production activities may justify revisions of estimates that were made previously. If significant, such revisions could change the schedule of any further production and development drilling. Accordingly, reserve estimates may differ significantly from the quantities of natural gas, NGLs and oil that are ultimately recovered.

Should one or more of the risks or uncertainties described in this Quarterly Report occur, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results and plans could differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements.

All forward-looking statements, expressed or implied, included in this Quarterly Report are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. This cautionary statement should also be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that we or persons acting on our behalf may issue.

Except as otherwise required by applicable law, we disclaim any duty to update any forward-looking statements, all of which are expressly qualified by the statements in this section, to reflect new information obtained or events or circumstances that occur after the date of this Quarterly Report.

 

 

4

---

 

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ECLIPSE RESOURCES CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

5

---

 

ECLIPSE RESOURCES CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

6

---

 

ECLIPSE RESOURCES CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

7

---

 

ECLIPSE RESOURCES CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands, except share amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

8

---

 

ECLIPSE RESOURCES CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

9

---

 

ECLIPSE RESOURCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

Note 1—Organization and Nature of Operations

Eclipse Resources Corporation (the “Company”) is an independent exploration and production company engaged in the acquisition and development of oil and natural gas properties in the Appalachian Basin of the United States, which encompasses the Utica Shale and Marcellus Shale prospective areas.

 

 

Note 2—Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited except the condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2015, which is derived from the Company’s audited financial statements, and are presented in accordance with the requirements of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim reporting. They do not include all disclosures normally made and contained in annual financial statements. In management’s opinion, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods disclosed have been made. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements, and the notes to those statements, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 4, 2016.

Operating results for interim periods may not necessarily be indicative of the results of operations for the full year ending December 31, 2016 or any other future periods.

Preparation in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires the Company to (1) adopt accounting policies within accounting rules set by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and (2) make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and other disclosed amounts. Note 3—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies describes our significant accounting policies. The Company’s management believes the major estimates and assumptions impacting the condensed consolidated financial statements are the following:

Actual results may differ from estimates and assumptions of future events and these revisions could be material. Future production may vary materially from estimated oil and natural gas proved reserves. Actual future prices may vary significantly from price assumptions.

 

 

Note 3—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(a) Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents are comprised of cash in banks and highly liquid instruments with original maturities of three months or less, primarily consisting of bank time deposits and investments in institutional money market funds. The carrying amounts approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these items. Cash in bank accounts at times may exceed federally insured limits.

10

---

 

(b) Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are carried at estimated net realizable value. Receivables deemed uncollectible are charged directly to expense. Trade credit is generally extended on a short-term basis, and therefore, accounts receivable do not bear interest, although a finance charge may be applied to such receivables that are past due. A valuation allowance is provided for those accounts for which collection is estimated as doubtful and uncollectible accounts are written off and charged against the allowance. In estimating the allowance, management considers, among other things, how recently and how frequently payments have been received and the financial position of the counterparty. The Company did not deem any of its accounts receivables to be uncollectible as of September 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015.

The Company accrues revenue due to timing differences between the delivery of natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs), and crude oil and the receipt of a delivery statement. These revenues are recorded based upon volumetric data from the Company’s records and management’s estimates of the related commodity sales and transportation and compression fees. The Company had $18.1 million and $19.9 million of accrued revenues, net of certain expenses, at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, which were included in accounts receivable within the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.

(c) Property and Equipment

Oil and Natural Gas Properties

The Company follows the successful efforts method of accounting for its oil and natural gas operations. Acquisition costs for oil and natural gas properties, costs of drilling and equipping productive wells, and costs of unsuccessful development wells are capitalized and amortized on an equivalent unit-of-production basis over the life of the remaining related oil and gas reserves. The estimated future costs of dismantlement, restoration, plugging and abandonment of oil and gas properties and related disposal are capitalized when asset retirement obligations are incurred and amortized as part of depreciation, depletion and amortization expense (see “Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization” below).

Costs incurred to acquire producing and non-producing leaseholds are capitalized. All unproved leasehold acquisition costs are initially capitalized, including the cost of leasing agents, title work and due diligence. If the Company acquires leases in a prospective area, these costs are capitalized as unproved leasehold costs. If no leases are acquired by the Company with respect to the initial costs incurred or the Company discontinues leasing in a prospective area, the costs are charged to exploration expense. Unproved leasehold costs that are determined to have proved oil and gas reserves are transferred to proved leasehold costs.

Upon the sale or retirement of a complete field of a proved property, the cost is eliminated from the property accounts, and the resultant gain or loss is reclassified to the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations. Upon the sale of an individual well, the proceeds are credited to accumulated depreciation and depletion within the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets. Upon sale of an entire interest in an unproved property where the property had been assessed for impairment individually, a gain or loss is recognized in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations. If a partial interest in an unproved property is sold, any funds received are accounted for as a reduction of the cost in the interest retained.

A summary of property and equipment including oil and natural gas properties is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Exploration expenses, including geological and geophysical expenses and delay rentals for unevaluated oil and gas properties are charged to expense as incurred. Exploratory drilling costs are initially capitalized as unproved property, not subject to depletion, but charged to expense if and when the well is determined not to have found proved oil and gas reserves.

11

---

 

The Company capitalized interest expense totaling $0.4 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  The Company capitalized interest expense totaling $0.8 million and $3.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Other Property and Equipment

Other property and equipment include land, buildings, leasehold improvements, vehicles, computer equipment and software, telecommunications equipment, and furniture and fixtures. These items are recorded at cost, or fair value if acquired through a business acquisition.

(d) Revenue Recognition

Oil and natural gas sales revenue is recognized when produced quantities of oil and natural gas are delivered to a custody transfer point such as a pipeline, processing facility or a tank lifting has occurred, persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement exists, the rights and responsibility of ownership pass to the purchaser upon delivery, collection of revenue from the sales is reasonably assured and the sales price is fixed or determinable. Revenues from the sales of natural gas, crude oil and NGLs in which the Company has an interest with other producers are recognized using the sales method on the basis of the Company’s net revenue interest. The Company did not have any material imbalances as of September 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015.

In accordance with the terms of joint operating agreements, from time to time, the Company may be paid monthly fees for operating or drilling wells for outside owners. The fees are meant to recoup some of the operator’s general and administrative costs in connection with well and drilling operations and are accounted for as credits to general and administrative expense.

Brokered natural gas and marketing revenues include revenues from brokered gas or revenue the Company receives as a result of selling and buying natural gas that is not related to its production and revenue from the release of transportation capacity. The Company realizes brokered margins as a result of buying and selling natural gas utilizing separate purchase and sale transactions, typically with separate counterparties, whereby the Company or the counterparty takes title to the natural gas purchased or sold. Revenues and expenses related to brokering natural gas are reported gross as part of revenue and expense in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The Company considers these activities as ancillary to its natural gas sales and thus, reports them within one operating segment.

(e) Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company’s principal exposures to credit risk are through the sale of its oil and natural gas production and related products and services, joint interest owner receivables and receivables resulting from commodity derivative contracts. The inability or failure of the Company’s significant customers or counterparties to meet their obligations or their insolvency or liquidation may adversely affect the Company’s financial results. The following table summarizes the Company’s concentration of receivables, net of allowances, by product or service as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

 

 

Oil and natural gas customers include pipelines, distribution companies, producers, gas marketers and industrial users primarily located in the State of Ohio. As a general policy, collateral is not required for receivables, but customers’ financial condition and credit worthiness are evaluated regularly. By using derivative instruments that are not traded on an exchange to hedge exposures to changes in commodity prices, the Company exposes itself to the credit risk of counterparties. Credit risk is the potential failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty is expected to owe the Company, which creates credit risk. To minimize the credit risk in derivative instruments, the Company’s policy is to enter into derivative contracts only with counterparties that are creditworthy financial institutions deemed by management as competent and competitive market-makers. Additionally, the Company uses master netting agreements to minimize credit-risk exposure. The creditworthiness of the Company’s counterparties is subject to periodic review. The fair value of the

12

---

 

Company’s unsettled commodity derivative contracts was a net liability position of ($6.8) million and a net asset position of $34.4 million at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Other than as provided by its revolving credit facility, the Company is not required to provide credit support or collateral to any of its counterparties under the Company’s contracts, nor are such counterparties required to provide credit support to the Company. As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company did not have past-due receivables from or payables to any of such counterparties.

(f) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive loss includes net loss and all other changes in the equity of a business during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources that, under U.S. GAAP, have not been recognized in the calculation of net loss. These changes, other than net loss, are referred to as “other comprehensive loss” and for the Company they include a pension benefit plan that requires the Company to (i) recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit retirement plan as an asset or liability in its consolidated balance sheet and (ii) recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through other comprehensive loss. The Company’s pension plan was terminated in October 2015 and lump sum payments were made in final settlement to all remaining participants.

(g) Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization

Oil and Natural Gas Properties

Depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”) of capitalized costs of proved oil and natural gas properties is computed using the unit-of-production method on a field level basis using total estimated proved reserves. The reserve base used to calculate DD&A for leasehold acquisition costs and the cost to acquire proved properties is the sum of proved developed reserves and proved undeveloped reserves. The reserve base used to calculate DD&A for drilling, completion and well equipment costs, which include development costs and successful exploration drilling costs, includes only proved developed reserves. DD&A expense relating to proved oil and natural gas properties  totaled approximately $27.7 million and $66.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and  $62.8 million and $168.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Other Property and Equipment

Depreciation with respect to other property and equipment is calculated using straight-line methods based on expected lives of the individual assets or groups of assets ranging from 5 to 40 years. Depreciation  totaled approximately $0.5 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and  $1.5 million and $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. This amount is included in DD&A expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

(h) Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If it is determined that an asset’s estimated future cash flows will not be sufficient to recover its carrying amount, an impairment charge will be recorded to reduce the carrying amount for that asset to its estimated fair value if such carrying amount exceeds the fair value.

The review for impairment of the Company’s oil and gas properties is done by determining if the historical cost of proved and unproved properties less the applicable accumulated DD&A and abandonment is less than the estimated expected undiscounted future cash flows. The expected future cash flows are estimated based on the Company’s plans to continue to produce and develop proved reserves and a risk-adjusted portion of probable reserves. Expected future cash flow from the sale of production of reserves is calculated based on estimated future prices. The Company estimates prices based upon current contracts in place, adjusted for basis differentials and market-related information, including published futures prices. The estimated future level of production is based on assumptions surrounding future prices and costs, field decline rates, market demand and supply and the economic and regulatory climates. If the carrying value exceeds the expected future cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between the estimated fair market value (as determined by discounted future cash flows) and the carrying value of the assets. As a result of the decline in commodity prices, the Company recognized impairment expenses of approximately $17.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016  relating to proved properties in the Marcellus Shale. There were no impairments of proved properties for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2015 or the three months ended September 30, 2016.

The aforementioned impairment charge represented a significant Level 3 measurement in the fair value hierarchy. The primary input used was the Company’s forecasted discount net cash flows.

13

---

 

The determination of oil and natural gas reserve estimates is a subjective process, and the accuracy of any reserve estimate depends on the quality of available data and the application of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Estimates of economically recoverable reserves and future net cash flows depend on a number of variable factors and assumptions that are difficult to predict and may vary considerably from actual results.

Unproved properties are reviewed annually for impairment or whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment charge is recorded if conditions indicate the Company will not explore the acreage prior to expiration of the applicable leases. The Company recorded impairment charges of unproved oil and gas properties related to lease expirations of approximately $9.4 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and  approximately $28.1 million and $7.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase in impairment charges during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016  is the result of an increase in expected lease expirations due to the reduction in the Company’s planned future drilling activity due to the current commodity pricing environment. These costs are included in exploration expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

(i) Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes, as required, under the liability method as set out in the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740 “Income Taxes.” Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

ASC Topic 740 further provides that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits. Income tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date to be recognized upon the adoption of the uncertain tax position guidance and in subsequent periods. This interpretation also provides guidance on measurement, derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company has not recorded a reserve for any uncertain tax positions to date.

(j) Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company has established a hierarchy to measure its financial instruments at fair value which requires it to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The hierarchy defines three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1—Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical, unrestricted assets and liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2—Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset and liability or can be corroborated with observable market date for substantially the entire contractual term of the asset or liability.

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that reflect the entity’s own assumptions about the assumption market participants would use in the pricing of the asset or liability and are consequently not based on market activity but rather through particular valuation techniques.

Valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs are favored. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest priority level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the placement of assets and liabilities within the levels of the fair value hierarchy.

(k) Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company uses derivative financial instruments to reduce exposure to fluctuations in the prices of the energy commodities it sells.

14

---

 

Derivatives are recorded at fair value and are included on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as current and noncurrent assets and liabilities. Derivatives are classified as current or noncurrent based on the contractual expiration date. Derivatives with expiration dates within the next 12 months are classified as current. The Company netted the fair value of derivatives by counterparty in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets where the right to offset exists. The Company’s derivative instruments were not designated as hedges for accounting purposes for any of the periods presented. Accordingly, the changes in fair value are recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations in the period of change. Gains and losses on derivatives are included in cash flows from operating activities. Premiums for options are included in cash flows from operating activities.

The valuation of the Company’s derivative financial instruments represents a Level 2 measurement in the fair value hierarchy.

(l) Asset Retirement Obligation

The Company recognizes a legal liability for its asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) in accordance with ASC Topic 410, “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations,” associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset, in the period in which it is incurred or becomes determinable, with an associated increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The cost of the tangible asset, including the initially recognized asset retirement cost, is depreciated over the useful life of the asset and accretion expense is recognized over time as the discounted liability is accreted to its expected settlement value. The Company measures the fair value of its ARO using expected future cash outflows for abandonment discounted back to the date that the abandonment obligation was measured using an estimated credit adjusted rate, which was 10.33% and 10.45% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Estimating the future ARO requires management to make estimates and judgments based on historical estimates regarding timing and existence of a liability, as well as what constitutes adequate restoration, inherent in the fair value calculation are numerous assumptions and judgments including the ultimate costs, inflation factors, credit adjusted discount rates, timing of settlement and changes in the legal, regulatory, environmental and political environments. To the extent future revisions to these assumptions impact the fair value of the existing ARO liability, a corresponding adjustment is made to the related asset.

The following table sets forth the changes in the Company’s ARO liability for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 (in thousands):

 

 

The inputs used to determine such fair value are primarily based upon costs incurred historically for similar work, as well as estimates from independent third parties for costs that would be incurred to restore leased property to the contractually stipulated condition. Additions to ARO represent a significant nonrecurring Level 3 measurement.

(m) Lease Obligations

The Company leases office space under operating leases that expire between the years 2016 to 2025. The lease terms begin on the date of initial possession of the leased property for purposes of recognizing lease expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The Company does not assume renewals in its determination of the lease terms unless the renewals are deemed to be reasonably assured at lease inception.

(n) Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

(o) Segment Reporting

The Company operates in one industry segment: the oil and natural gas exploration and production industry in the United States. All of its operations are conducted in one geographic area of the United States. All revenues are derived from customers located in the United States.

15

---

 

(p) Debt Issuance Costs

The expenditures related to issuing debt are capitalized and reported as a reduction of the Company’s debt balance in the accompanying balance sheets. These costs are amortized over the expected life of the related instruments using the effective interest rate method. When debt is retired before maturity or modifications significantly change the cash flows, related unamortized costs are expensed.

(q) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“Update 2014-09”)”, which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements (and some cost guidance) in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the industry topics of the Accounting Standards Codification. In addition, the existing requirements for the recognition of a gain or loss on the transfer of nonfinancial assets that are not in a contract with a customer (for example, assets within the scope of Topic 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment”, and intangible assets within the scope of Topic 350, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other”) are amended to be consistent with the guidance on recognition and measurement (including the constraint on revenue) in Update 2014-09. Topic 606 requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this, an entity should identify the contract with a customer, identify the performance obligations in the contract, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies the performance obligations. These requirements are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption on its financial position, results of operations and related disclosures.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.” The new standard provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going concern uncertainties in the financial statements. Management will be required to perform interim and annual assessments of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date and financial statements are issued. ASU 2014-15 is effective for annual and interim periods ending after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statement disclosures.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” The new standard provides guidance to increase transparency and comparability among organizations and industries by recognizing lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. An entity will be required to recognize all leases in the statement of financial position as assets and liabilities regardless of the leases classification. These requirements are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on its financial position, results of operations and related disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” The new standard provides guidance involving several aspects of the accounting for share-based payments transactions, including income tax consequences, award classification as liabilities or equity, and cash flow statements classifications. These requirements are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 on its financial position, results of operations and related disclosures.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.”  The new standard provides guidance on how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified on the statement of cash flows.  These requirements are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-15 on its financial position, results of operations and related disclosures.

(r) Change in estimates

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016 , the Company reduced its estimate of amounts due from a non-operated partner related to the sale of natural gas and NGLs, net of associated costs, based on revised information received from the non-operated partner during the period.  As a result, the Company decreased accounts receivable by approximately $4 million, increased revenue from oil and natural gas sales by approximately $1.5 million, and increased transportation, gathering and compression expense by approximately $5.8 million, which increased the net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 by approximately $4 million, or $0.02 per common share.  

16

---

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company reduced its estimate for production and ad valorem tax expense based on recent historical experience and additional information received during the period. As a result, the Company decreased the accrual for production and ad valorem taxes to be paid by approximately $4 million, which decreased the net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 by a corresponding amount, or $0.02 per common share.

 

 

Note 4—Sale of Oil and Natural Gas Property Interests

  During the nine months ended September 30, 2016   , the Company completed the sale of its Conventional oil and gas properties and related equipment for approximately $4.7 million. As a result of this sale, the Company recognized a gain of approximately $1.0 million  .

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016  , the Company received $3.9 million from the sale of mineral interests related primarily to unproved properties to a third party.  No gain or loss was recognized for this transaction, which was recorded as a reduction of oil and natural gas properties.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company received $4.8 million from the sale of unproved leases to a third party. No gain or loss was recognized for this transaction, which was recorded as a reduction of oil and natural gas properties.

During the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company received $0.4 million from the sale of pipeline assets.  As a result of this sale, the Company recognized a loss of less than $0.1 million.

During the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company received $1.1 million from acreage trades with various working interest owners totaling approximately 149.5 acres.  No gain or loss was recognized for this transaction, which was recorded as a reduction of oil and gas properties.

 

 

Note 5—Derivative Instruments

Commodity Derivatives

The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in energy commodity prices within its operations. The Company utilizes derivatives to manage exposure to the variability in expected future cash flows from forecasted sales of natural gas and oil. The Company currently uses a mix of over-the-counter (“OTC”) fixed price swaps, basis swaps and put options spreads and collars to manage its exposure to commodity price fluctuations. All of the Company’s derivative instruments are used for risk management purposes and none are held for trading or speculative purposes.

The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of non-performance by counterparties. To mitigate this risk, the Company enters into derivative contracts only with counterparties that are rated “A” or higher by S&P or Moody’s. The creditworthiness of counterparties is subject to periodic review. As of September 30, 2016, the Company’s derivative instruments were with Bank of Montreal, Citibank, N.A., and Key Bank, N.A. The Company has not experienced any issues of non-performance by derivative counterparties. Below is a summary of the Company’s derivative instrument positions, as of September 30, 2016, for future production periods:

17

---

 

Natural Gas Derivatives

 

 

Oil Derivatives

 

 

 

NGL Derivatives

 

 

 

18

---

 

Fair Values and Gains (Losses)

The following table summarizes the fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments on a gross basis and on a net basis as presented in the condensed consolidated balance sheets (in thousands). None of the derivative instruments are designated as hedges for accounting purposes.

 

 

 

The following table presents the Company’s reported gains and losses on derivative instruments and where such values are recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the periods presented (in thousands):

 

 

 

19

---

 

Note 6—Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurement on a Recurring Basis

The following table presents, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The carrying amounts reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the nature of the instrument and/or the short-term maturity of these instruments. The fair value of the Company’s derivatives is based on third-party pricing models which utilize inputs that are readily available in the public market, such as natural gas and crude oil forward curves. These values are compared to the values given by counterparties for reasonableness. Since the Company’s derivative instruments do not include optionality and therefore generally have no unobservable inputs, they are classified as Level 2.

 

 

Nonfinancial Assets and Liabilities

Assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations are recorded at their fair value on the date of acquisition. Significant Level 3 assumptions associated with the calculation of future cash flows used in the analysis of fair value of the oil and natural gas property acquired include the Company’s estimate of future commodity prices, production costs, development expenditures, production, risk-adjusted discount rates, and other relevant data. Additionally, fair value is used to determine the inception value of the Company’s AROs. The inputs used to determine such fair value are primarily based upon costs incurred historically for similar work, as well as estimates from independent third parties for costs that would be incurred to restore leased property to the contractually stipulated condition. Additions to the Company’s ARO represent a nonrecurring Level 3 measurement. (See Note 3—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies).

The Company reviews its proved oil and natural gas properties for impairment purposes by comparing the expected undiscounted future cash flows at a producing field level to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset. Significant assumptions associated with the calculation of future cash flows used in the impairment analysis include the estimate of future commodity prices, production costs, development expenditures, production, risk-adjusted discount rates and other relevant data. As such, the fair value of oil and natural gas properties used in estimating impairment represents a nonrecurring Level 3 measurement. (See Note 3—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies).

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments closely approximate the carrying amounts due, except for long-term debt. (See Note 7—Debt).

 

 

Note 7—Debt

12% Senior Unsecured PIK Notes Due 2018

The Company redeemed all of the outstanding balance of the 12% Senior PIK Notes on July 13, 2015 for approximately $510.7 million, including outstanding principal balance of $437.3 million, a make-whole premium of $47.6 million, and accrued interest of $25.8 million. The make-whole premium plus unamortized discount and deferred financing costs of $11.8 million were charged to loss on early extinguishment of debt, totaling $59.4 million.

8.875% Senior Unsecured Notes Due 2023

On July 6, 2015, the Company issued $550 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.875% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2023 (the “Notes”) at an issue price of 97.903% of the principal amount of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and other initial purchasers. In this private offering, the Notes were sold for cash to qualified institutional buyers in the United States pursuant to Rule 144A of the Securities Act and to persons outside the United States in compliance with Regulation S under the Securities Act. Upon closing, the Company received proceeds of approximately $525.5 million, after

20

---

 

deducting original issue discount, the initial purchasers’ discounts and estimated offering expenses, of which the Company used approximately $510.7 million to finance the redemption of all of its outstanding Senior PIK Notes. The Company intends to use the remaining net proceeds to fund its capital expenditure plan and for general corporate purposes. The fair value of the Notes at September 30, 2016 was $497.4 million.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company amortized $0.7 million and $2.5 million, respectively, of deferred financing costs and debt discount to interest expense using the effective interest method.  The Company amortized less than $0.1 million and $1.9 million of deferred financing costs and debt discount to interest expense using the effective interest method for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. 

The Indenture governing the Notes (the “Indenture”) contains covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries to: (i) incur additional indebtedness, (ii) pay dividends on capital stock or redeem, repurchase or retire the Company’s capital stock or subordinated indebtedness, (iii) transfer or sell assets, (iv) make investments, (v) create certain liens, (vi) enter into agreements that restrict dividends or other payments to the Company from its restricted subsidiaries, (vii) consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of the assets of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (viii) engage in transactions with affiliates, and (ix) create unrestricted subsidiaries. These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications set forth in the Indenture. In addition, if the Notes achieve and investment grade rating from either Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, and no default under the Indenture has then occurred and is continuing, many of such covenants will be suspended. The Indenture also contains events of default, which include, among others and subject in certain cases to grace and cure periods, nonpayment of principal or interest, failure by the Company to comply with its other obligations under the indenture, payment defaults and accelerations with respect to certain other indebtedness of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries, failure of any guarantee on the Notes to be enforceable, and certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency. The Company was in compliance with all applicable covenants in the Indenture at September 30, 2016.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company repurchased $39.5 million of the outstanding Notes in open market purchases for $23.4 million. The principal of the outstanding Notes that were repurchased less cash proceeds and unamortized debt discount and deferred financing costs were charged to gain on early extinguishment of debt, totaling $14.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.  The Company repurchased all such Notes with cash on hand. 

Revolving Credit Facility

The Company has entered into a $500 million senior secured revolving bank credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) that matures in 2018. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are subject to borrowing base limitations based on the collateral value of the Company’s proved properties and commodity hedge positions and are subject to semiannual redeterminations (April and October). At September 30, 2016, the borrowing base was $125 million and the Company had no outstanding borrowings. After giving effect to outstanding letters of credit issued by the Company totaling $31.2 million, the Company had available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility of $93.8 million at September 30, 2016.  

Subsequent to September 30, 2016, the Company posted a letter of credit for $3.3 million related to firm transportation commitments, which reduced the Company’s available borrowing capacity to $90.5 million.  During October 2016, the Company completed its most recent borrowing base redetermination, which resulted in no change to the borrowing base under the Revolving Credit Facility.  

On February 24, 2016, the Company amended the Credit Agreement governing its Revolving Credit Facility (the “Credit Agreement”) to, among other things, adjust the Company’s quarterly minimum interest coverage ratio, which is the ratio of EBITDAX to Cash Interest Expense, and to permit the sale of certain conventional properties. The amendment to the Credit Agreement also increased the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) applicable to loans and letter of credit participation fees under the Credit Agreement by 0.5% and required the Company to, within 60 days of the effectiveness of the amendment, execute and deliver additional mortgages on the Company’s oil and gas properties that include at least 90% of its proved reserves.

The Revolving Credit Facility is secured by mortgages on substantially all of the Company’s properties and guarantees from the Company’s operating subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement contains certain covenants, including restrictions on indebtedness and dividends, and requirements with respect to working capital and interest coverage ratios. Interest is payable at a variable rate based on LIBOR or the prime rate based on the Company’s election at the time of borrowing. The Company was in compliance with all applicable covenants under the Credit Agreement as of September 30, 2016. Commitment fees on the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Facility are due quarterly at rates ranging from 0.375% to 0.50% of the unused facility based on utilization.

 

21

---

 

Note 8—Benefit Plans

Defined Contribution Plan

The Company currently maintains a retirement plan intended to provide benefits under section 401(K) of the Internal Revenue Code, under which employees are allowed to contribute portions of their compensation to a tax-qualified retirement account. Under the 401(K) plan, the Company provides matching contributions equal to 100% of the first 6% of employees’ eligible compensation contributed to the plan. The Company recognized expense of $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $0.5 million and $0.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Defined Benefit Plan

The Company maintained a defined benefit plan until October 2015. The plan covered 28 employees, of which two were retired, four had deferred vested determination, and one was a survivor. Benefits were based on the employees’ years of service and compensation. The following table details the components of pension benefit cost (in thousands):

 

 

The defined benefit plan was terminated during October 2015 and lump sum payments were made to the remaining participants.  Accordingly, the Company did not have any pension benefit costs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.

 

 

Note 9—Stock-Based Compensation

The Company is authorized to grant up to 16,000,000 shares of common stock under its 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan allows stock-based compensation awards to be granted in a variety of forms, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, dividend equivalent rights, qualified performance-based awards and other types of awards. The terms and conditions of the awards granted are established by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. A total of 8,019,938 shares were available for future grants under the Plan as of September 30, 2016.

Our stock-based compensation expense was as follows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):

 

 

22

---

 

Restricted Stock Units

Restricted stock unit awards vest subject to the satisfaction of service requirements. The Company recognizes expense related to restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is three years. The grant date fair values of these awards are determined based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. As of September 30, 2016, there was $6.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding restricted stock units. A summary of restricted stock unit awards activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 is as follows:

 

 

Performance Units

Performance unit awards vest subject to the satisfaction of a three-year service requirement and based on Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”), as compared to an industry peer group over that same period. The performance unit awards are measured at the grant date at fair value using a Monte Carlo valuation method. As of September 30, 2016, there was $3.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding performance units. A summary of performance stock unit awards activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 is as follows:

 

 

The determination of the fair value of the performance unit awards noted above uses significant Level 3 assumptions in the fair value hierarchy including an estimate of the timing of forfeitures, the risk free rate and a volatility estimate tied to the Company’s public peer group.

Restricted Stock Issued to Directors

On October 7, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of 31,115 restricted shares of common stock to its seven non-employee members of its Board of Directors, which became fully vested on June 25, 2015. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recognized expense of approximately $0.3 million related to these awards, respectively.

On May 11, 2015, the Company issued an aggregate of 132,496 restricted shares of common stock to its seven non-employee members of its Board of Directors, which became fully vested on May 11, 2016. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recognized expense of approximately $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, related to these awards.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recognized expense of approximately $0.3 million related to these awards.

On May 18, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 149,448 restricted shares of common stock to its three non-employee members of its Board of Directors that are not affiliated with the Company’s controlling stockholder, which are scheduled to fully vest on May 18, 2017.  For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recognized expense of approximately $0.2 million related to these awards.  As of September 30, 2016, there was approximately $0.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding restricted stock issued to the Company’s directors.

 

 

23

---

 

Note 10—Equity

Private Placement of Common Stock

On December 27, 2014, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with private equity funds managed by EnCap Investments L.P., entities controlled by certain members of the Company’s management team and certain other institutional investors pursuant to which the Company issued and sold to such purchasers an aggregate of 62,500,000 shares of common stock at a price of $7.04 per share pursuant to the exemptions from registration provided in Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act (the “Private Placement”).

On January 28, 2015, the Company closed the Private Placement and received net proceeds of approximately $434 million (after deducting placement agent commissions and estimated expenses), which the Company intends to use to fund its capital expenditure plan and for general corporate purposes.

Public Offering of Common Stock

On June 28, 2016, the Company commenced an underwritten public offering of 37,500,000 shares of common stock, which was priced at $3.50 per share.  The Company closed the offering on July 5, 2016 and received net proceeds of approximately $123 million (after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated expenses), which the Company intends to use to fund its capital expenditure plan and for general corporate purposes.  

 

 

Note 11—Related Party Transactions

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company incurred approximately $0.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively, and $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively,  related to flight charter services provided by BWH Air, LLC and BWH Air II, LLC, which are owned by the Company’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. The fees are paid in accordance with a standard service contract that does not obligate the Company to any minimum terms.

 

 

Note 12—Commitments and Contingencies

(a) Legal Matters

Prior to the Company’s acquisition of the Oxford Oil Company (“Oxford”), which was completed in June 2013, Oxford commenced a lawsuit on October 24, 2011 in the Common Pleas Court of Belmont County, Ohio against Mr. Barry West, a lessor under an Oxford oil and gas lease, to enforce its rights to access and drill a well pursuant to the lease during its initial 5-year primary term. The lessor counterclaimed, alleging, among other things, that the challenged Oxford lease constituted a lease in perpetuity and, accordingly, should be deemed void and contrary to public policy in the State of Ohio. On October 4, 2013, the Belmont County trial court granted a motion for summary judgment in favor of the lessor and ruled that the lease is a “no term” perpetual lease and, as such, is void as a matter of Ohio law.  On October 8, 2013, the Company appealed the trial court’s decision in the West case to the Ohio Court of Appeals for the Seventh Appellate District, arguing, among other things, that the Belmont County trial court erred in finding that the lease is a “no term” perpetual lease, by ruling that perpetual leases are void as a matter of Ohio law and by invalidating such leases.

On September 26, 2014, the Ohio Court of Appeals for the Seventh Appellate District issued its decision in the case of State ex rel. Claugus Family Farm, L.P. v. Beck Energy Corporation (formerly entitled, Hupp v. Beck Energy Corporation), an appeal of a Monroe County, Ohio trial court decision upon which the trial court in West based its decision. The appellate court held that while Ohio law disfavors perpetual leases, courts in Ohio have not found them to be per se illegal or void from their inception. The appellate court further held that the trial court misinterpreted both the pertinent lease provisions and Ohio law on the subject and erred in concluding that the Beck Energy lease is a no-term, perpetual lease that is void ab initio as against public policy. On November 7, 2014, the plaintiff landowners filed an appeal of the appellate court’s decision with the Supreme Court of Ohio, which was accepted by the Supreme Court of Ohio on January 28, 2015. On March 2, 2015, the Ohio Court of Appeals for the Seventh Appellate District stayed all proceedings in the Company’s appeal in the West case pending a decision by the Supreme Court of Ohio in the Claugus Family v. Beck Energy appeal. On January 21, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio affirmed the Appellate Court’s decision in Claugus Family v. Beck Energy and held that the subject lease was not perpetual and not void as against public policy. As a result of such ruling, on February 26, 2016, the Ohio Court of Appeals for the Seventh Appellate District lifted the stay of the Company’s appeal in the West case.

24

---

 

On September 6, 2016, the Ohio Court of Appeals for the Seventh Appellate District issued its decision in the West case in the Company’s favor reversing the trial court’s holdings that the Oxford oil and gas lease was perpetual and void.  The appellate court held that the Oxford oil and gas lease in West was not perpetual because it had a primary term of a definitive duration of five years, and remanded the lawsuit to the trial court for further proceedings on other claims unrelated to the perpetual lease claim.  Mr. West did not appeal the decision of the Ohio Court of Appeals for the Seventh Appellate District to the Ohio Supreme Court, thus concluding the matter as to the perpetual lease claim.

The Company is a party to one other lawsuit that claims the Oxford oil and gas lease is void as a perpetual lease in reliance upon the trial court’s decision in the West case, which was stayed pending the outcome of the appeal in the West case. This lawsuit affects approximately 60 leasehold acres and was capitalized on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2016 at $0.7 million.  Based upon the decision of the appellate court in West upholding the validity of the Oxford lease, the Company expects that the perpetual lease claim filed in this additional lawsuit will likely be dismissed by the trial court.

Other Matters

From time to time, the Company may be a party to legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Management does not believe that a material loss is probable as a result of such proceedings.

(b) Environmental Matters

The Company is subject to numerous laws and regulations governing the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to environmental protection. To the extent laws are enacted or other governmental action is taken that restricts drilling or imposes environmental protection requirements that result in increased costs to the oil and natural gas industry in general, the business and prospects of the Company could be adversely affected.

(c) Leases

The development of the Company’s oil and natural gas properties under their related leases will require a significant amount of capital. The timing of those expenditures will be determined by the lease provisions, the term of the lease and other factors associated with unproved leasehold acreage. To the extent that the Company is not the operator of oil and natural gas properties that it owns an interest in, the timing, and to some degree the amount, of capital expenditures will be controlled by the operator of such properties.

The Company leases office space under operating leases that expire between the years 2016 to 2025. The Company recognized rent expense of $0.1 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $0.7 million and $0.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

 

Note 13—Income Tax

For the year ending December 31, 2016, the Company’s annual estimated effective tax rate is forecasted to be 0%, exclusive of discrete items. The Company expects to incur both a book and tax loss in fiscal year 2016, and thus, no current federal income taxes are anticipated to be paid. The Company computes its quarterly taxes under the effective tax rate method based on applying an anticipated annual effective tax rate to the Company’s year-to-date loss. For the quarter ended September 30, 2016, the Company’s overall effective tax rate on operations was different than the federal statutory rate of 35% due primarily to valuation allowances and other permanent differences.

In forecasting the 2016 annual estimated effective tax rate, management believes that it should limit any tax benefit suggested by the tax effect of the forecasted book loss such that no net deferred tax asset is recorded in 2016. Management reached this conclusion considering several factors such as: (i) the Company’s short tax history, (ii) the lack of carryback potential resulting in a tax refund, and (iii) in light of current commodity pricing uncertainty, there is insufficient external evidence to suggest that net tax attribute carryforwards are collectible beyond offsetting existing deferred tax liabilities inherent in the Company’s balance sheet. At this time, the estimated valuation allowance to be recorded in 2016 is $53.7 million.

During the second quarter of 2016, the Internal Revenue Service notified the Company that it would examine the federal income tax return of Eclipse Resources Corporation and Subsidiaries for its 2014 tax year. The Company does not anticipate any material adjustments to its provision for income taxes as a result of the examination, as such no reserve has been recorded at this time.  

 

 

25

---

 

Note 14—Subsidiary Guarantors

The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries each have fully and unconditionally, joint and severally, guaranteed the Company’s 8.875% Senior Unsecured Notes (See Note 7—Debt). The Parent company has no independent assets or operations. The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries are not restricted from transferring funds to the Parent or other wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries do not have any restricted net assets.

A subsidiary guarantor may be released from its obligations under the guarantee:

 

 

Note 15—Subsequent Events

Management has evaluated subsequent events and believes there are no events that would have a material impact on the aforementioned financial statements and related disclosures, other than those disclosed in the accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements (See Note 7—Debt).

 

 

26

---

 

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. The following discussion contains “forward-looking statements” that reflect our future plans, estimates, beliefs and expected performance. We caution that assumptions, expectations, projections, intentions, or beliefs about future events may, and often do, vary from actual results and the differences can be material. See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements except as otherwise required by applicable law.

Overview of Our Business

We are an independent exploration and production company engaged in the acquisition and development of oil and natural gas properties in the Appalachian Basin. As of September 30, 2016, we had assembled an acreage position approximating 209,000 net acres in Eastern Ohio.

Approximately 101,000 of our net acres are located in the Utica Shale fairway, which we refer to as the Utica Core Area, and approximately 13,000 of these net acres are also prospective for the highly liquids rich area of the Marcellus Shale in Eastern Ohio within what we refer to as Our Marcellus Project Area. We are the operator of approximately 87% of our net acreage within the Utica Core Area and Our Marcellus Project Area. We intend to focus on developing our substantial inventory of horizontal drilling locations during commodity price environments that will allow us to generate attractive returns and will continue to opportunistically add to this acreage position where we can acquire acreage at attractive prices.

As of September 30, 2016, we, or our operating partners, had commenced drilling 205 gross wells within the Utica Core Area and Our Marcellus Project Area, of which 7 gross were drilling, 15 gross were awaiting completion or were in the process of being completed, 3 gross were awaiting midstream, and 180 gross had been turned to sales.

As of September 30, 2016, we were operating 1 horizontal rig in the Utica Core Area, which had resumed drilling during the second quarter of 2016. We had average daily production for the three months ended September 30, 2016 of approximately 221.6 MMcfe comprised of approximately 75% natural gas, 16% NGLs and 9% oil.

How We Evaluate Our Operations

In evaluating our current and future financial results, we focus on production and revenue growth, lease operating expense, general and administrative expense (both before and after non-cash stock compensation expense) and operating margin per unit of production. In addition to these metrics, we use Adjusted EBITDAX, a non-GAAP measure, to evaluate our financial results. We define Adjusted EBITDAX as net income (loss) before interest expense or interest income; income taxes; write-down of abandoned leases; impairments; depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”); amortization of deferred financing costs; gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net cash receipts (payments) on settled derivative instruments, and premiums (paid) received on options that settled during the period; non-cash compensation expense; gain or loss from sale of interest in gas properties; exploration expenses; and other unusual or infrequent items. Adjusted EBITDAX is not a measure of net income as determined by generally accepted accounting principles in United States, or “U.S. GAAP.”

In addition to the operating metrics above, as we grow our reserve base, we will assess our capital spending by calculating our operated proved developed reserves and our operated proved developed finding costs and development costs. We believe that operated proved developed finding and development costs are one of the key measurements of the performance of an oil and gas exploration and production company. We will focus on our operated properties as we control the location, spending and operations associated with drilling these properties. In determining our proved developed finding and development costs, only cash costs incurred in connection with exploration and development will be used in the calculation, while the costs of acquisitions will be excluded because our board approves each material acquisition. In evaluating our proved developed reserve additions, any reserve revisions for changes in commodity prices between years will be excluded from the assessment, but any performance related reserve revisions are included.

We also continually evaluate our rates of return on invested capital in our wells. We believe the quality of our assets combined with our technical and managerial expertise can generate attractive rates of return as we develop our acreage in the Utica Core Area and Our Marcellus Project Area. We review changes in drilling and completion costs; lease operating costs; natural gas, NGLs and oil prices; well productivity; and other factors in order to focus our drilling on the highest rate of return areas within our acreage.

27

---

 

Overview of Results for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 

Operationally, our performance during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016  reflects the continued development of our acreage, while focusing on capital preservation in the currently depressed commodity price environment.

During the three months ended September 30, 2016, we achieved the following financial and operating results:

  During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we achieved the following financial and operating results:

Market Conditions

Prices for various quantities of natural gas, NGLs and oil that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows. Prices for commodities, such as hydrocarbons, are inherently volatile. The following table lists average, high and low NYMEX Henry Hub prices for natural gas and NYMEX WTI prices for oil for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:

 

 

Historically, commodity prices have been extremely volatile, and we expect this volatility to continue for the foreseeable future. A further or extended decline in commodity prices could materially and adversely affect our future business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or ability to finance planned capital expenditures. We make price assumptions that are used for planning purposes, and a significant portion of our cash outlays, including rent, salaries and noncancelable capital commitments, are largely fixed in nature. Accordingly, if commodity prices are below the expectations on which these commitments were based, our financial results are likely to be adversely and disproportionately affected because these cash outlays are not variable in the short term and cannot be quickly reduced to respond to unanticipated decreases in commodity prices.

28

---

 

The significant price declines we have recently experienced have and could continue to adversely affect the amount of oil, NGLs and natural gas that we can produce economically, which has resulted in our having to make significant downward adjustments to our estimated proved undeveloped reserves. A reduction in production could also result in a shortfall in expected cash flows and require us to reduce capital spending or raise funds to cover any such shortfall. Any of these factors could negatively affect our ability to replace production and our future rate of growth or dilute existing shareholders.  

If the currently depressed pricing environment for natural gas, NGLs and oil persists or worsens, it may significantly impact our estimates of natural gas, NGLs and oil reserves, which are estimated and reported as of December 31 of each calendar year. Our estimated net proved reserves at December 31, 2015 were determined using a 12-month unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the month price for each month in the period from January 2015 to December 2015, which was $2.59 per MMBtu for natural gas and $50.28 per barrel for NGLs and oil. It is difficult to quantify the expected impact of currently depressed commodity prices on our previously reported estimated net proved reserves with any degree of certainty because of the various components and assumptions used in the process. However, if commodity prices remain at current levels or decline further, and assuming all other inputs remain constant, we expect a negative price-related revision to our previously reported estimated net proved reserves. We are still in the initial stages of our year-end reserves estimation process with our independent reserve engineers, including aligning our proved undeveloped reserves with our anticipated five-year drilling plan and accounting for current year activity. We are also awaiting final year-end pricing as well as revised differentials, capital costs and operating expense assumptions, many of which have improved since year-end 2015 as a result of the current commodity pricing environment. Therefore, we are unable to quantify the amount of any future reserve revisions at this time.      

 To demonstrate the sensitivity of our estimates of natural gas, NGLs and oil reserves to changes in commodity prices, if we reduced the 12-month average SEC price to $2.28 per MMBtu for natural gas and $41.68 per Bbl for NGLs and oil, and held all other factors constant, then our estimated net proved reserves at December 31, 2015 would have been reduced by approximately 22% from our previously reported estimated net proved reserves at such time, including an 8% reduction of proved developed reserves and a 78% reduction of proved undeveloped reserves. The foregoing prices were calculated using the unweighted arithmetic average first-day-of-the-month price for each of the twelve months in the period ended September 30, 2016. This calculation only isolates the potential impact of commodity prices on our estimated proved reserves and does not account for other factors impacting our estimated proved reserves, such as anticipated drilling and completion costs and our production results since December 31, 2015. There are also numerous uncertainties inherent in the estimation of proved reserves and accounting for oil and natural gas properties in subsequent periods. As such, this calculation is provided for illustrative purposes only and should not be construed as indicative of our final year-end reserve estimation process, which, as noted above, is still in its initial phase.

As a result of the decline in commodity prices, we recognized impairment expenses relating to proved properties of $17.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 i n the Marcellus Shale. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and the three months ended September 30, 2016,  we did not recognize impairment expenses relating to proved properties. In addition, we recognized impairment expenses relating to unproved properties of $28.1 million and $7.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

We consider future commodity prices when determining our development plan, but many other factors are also considered. Although the magnitude of change in these collective factors within a sustained low commodity price environment is difficult to estimate, we currently expect to execute our development plan based on current conditions. To the extent there is a significant increase or decrease in commodity prices in the future, we will assess the impact on our development plan at that time, and we may respond to such changes by altering our capital budget or our development plan. We plan to fund our development budget with a portion of the cash on hand at December 31, 2015, proceeds from our completed follow-on equity offering, borrowings under our revolving credit facility, proceeds from asset sales, and proceeds from additional debt and/or equity offerings.

29

---

 

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended September 30, 2016 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2015

Natural Gas, NGLs and Oil Sales, Production and Realized Price Calculations

The following table illustrates the revenue attributable to natural gas, NGLs and oil sales for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:

 

 

Our production decreased by approximately 0.3 Bcfe for the three months ended September 30, 2016 over the same period in 2015 due to natural decline and the impact of suspending operations during the first half of the year, partially offset by new wells that we placed into production. Our production for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 is set forth in the following table:

 

 

Our average realized price (including cash derivative settlements and firm third-party transportation costs) received during the three months ended September 30, 2016 was $2.51 per Mcfe compared to $3.25 per Mcfe during the three months ended September 30, 2015. Because we record transportation costs on two separate bases, as required by U.S. GAAP, we believe computed final realized prices of production volumes should include the total impact of firm transportation expense. Our average realized price (including all derivative settlements and third-party firm transportation costs) calculation also includes all cash settlements for derivatives. Average sales price (excluding cash settled derivatives) does not include derivative settlements or third-party transportation costs which are reported in transportation, gathering and compression expense on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. Average sales price (excluding cash settled derivatives) does include transportation costs where we receive net revenue proceeds from purchasers. Average realized price calculations for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 are shown below:

30

---

 

 

 

Brokered natural gas and marketing revenue was $0.1 million and $9.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  Brokered natural gas and marketing revenue includes revenue received from selling natural gas not related to production and from the release of firm transportation capacity.  The decrease from the prior year to the current year is due to increased utilization of our firm transportation capacity for operated production during the three months ended September 30, 2016, which resulted in a decrease in the amount of firm transportation that was available for brokered gas transactions or release to third parties.

Costs and Expenses

We believe some of our expense fluctuations are most accurately analyzed on a unit-of-production, or per Mcfe, basis. The following table presents these expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:

 

31

---

 

 

 

Lease operating expense was $2.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $3.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015.  Lease operating expense per Mcfe was $0.11 in the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $0.16 in the three months ended September 30, 2015.  The decrease of $1.0 million and $0.05 per Mcfe is attributable to reduced personnel costs, in part due to the sale of our Conventional oil and gas properties during 2016, and additional cost-cutting measures during the three months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2015.  Lease operating expenses include normally recurring expenses to operate and produce our wells, non-recurring workovers and repairs.        

Transportation, gathering and compression expense was $26.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $22.8 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015.  Transportation, gathering and compression expense per Mcfe was $1.32 in the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $1.10 in the three months ended September 30, 2015.  These third-party costs were higher in the three months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to increased firm transportation expenses as we utilized more of our firm transportation capacity for sales of our operated production during the current period      .  The following table details our transportation, gathering and compression expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:

 

 

Production and ad valorem taxes are paid based on market prices and applicable tax rates. Production and ad valorem taxes were $2.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $3.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015. Production and ad valorem taxes per Mcfe was $0.10 in the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $0.15 in the three months ended September 30, 2015.  Production and ad valorem taxes decreased from the three months ended September 30, 2015 to the three months ended September 30, 2016 due to a change in our estimated accrual rate based on recent historical experience      .

Depreciation, depletion and amortization was approximately $28.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $67.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease in the three months ended September 30, 2016 when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2015 is due to the decrease in proved property costs from impairment charges taken during 2015 and 2016 . On a per Mcfe basis, DD&A decreased to $1.38 in the three months ended September 30, 2016 from $3.24 in the three months ended September 30, 2015, which was predominantly driven by the lower depletion rate resulting from our reduced proved property costs.

General and administrative expense was $8.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $13.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015.  General and administrative expense per Mcfe was $0.39 in the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $0.66 in the three months ended September 30, 2015.  The decrease of $5.7 million and $0.27 per Mcfe during the three months ended September 30, 2016 when compared to three months ended September 30, 2015 was primarily due to lower salaries and benefits associated with reduced headcount as of September 30, 2016 as compared to September 30, 2015      .

32

---

 

Other Operating Expenses

Our total operating expenses also include other expenses that generally do not trend with production. The following table details our other operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:

 

 

Brokered natural gas and marketing expense was less than $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $9.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015.  Brokered natural gas and marketing expenses relate to gas purchases that we buy and sell not relating to production and firm transportation capacity that is marketed to third parties.  The decrease from the prior year to the current year is due to increased utilization of our firm transportation capacity for operated production during the three months ended September 30, 2016, which resulted in a decrease in the amount of firm transportation that was available for brokered gas transactions or release to third parties.

Exploration expense was $12.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $3.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The following table details our exploration-related expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:

 

 

Delay rentals were $2.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015.  The increase in delay rental expenses relates primarily to converting future lump-sum extension payments into annual delay rentals.

Impairment of unproved properties was $9.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $1.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015. We assess individually significant unproved properties for impairment and recognize a loss where circumstances indicate impairment in value. In determining whether a significant unproved property is impaired we consider numerous factors, including, but not limited to, current exploration plans, favorable or unfavorable activity on the property being evaluated and/or adjacent properties, our geologists’ evaluation of the property and the remaining months in the lease term for the property. Impairment of individually insignificant unproved properties is assessed and amortized on an aggregate basis based on our average holding period, expected forfeiture rate and anticipated drilling success. As we continue to review our acreage positions and high grade our drilling inventory based on the current price environment, additional leasehold impairments and abandonments may be recorded.

    Rig termination and standby expense for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was ($0.1) million related primarily to standby costs that we incurred from temporarily suspending our drilling operations earlier in the year. For the three months ended September 30, 2015, rig termination and standby expenses were $0.2 million related primarily to rig termination expenses.    

Accretion of asset retirement obligations was $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $0.4 million for three months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease in accretion expense primarily relates to the sale of our conventional assets and liabilities in the period prior to the three months ended September 30, 2016 .

33

---

 

Other Income (Expense)

Gain (loss) on derivative instruments was $10.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $23.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015. Cash receipts were approximately $4.6 million and $9.3 million for derivative instruments that settled during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, respectively.

Interest expense, net was $12.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $11.8 million for three months ended September 30, 2015.  The increase in interest expense primarily relates to lower capitalized interest, additional expense for surety bonds, and an increase in Revolving Credit Facility fees during the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2015.

Income tax expense (benefit) was $0.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to income tax benefit of ($18.3) million for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The reduction of income tax benefit recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to the similar period of the prior year was due to the Company recording a higher valuation allowance during the current period due to its recurring pre-tax losses.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015

Natural Gas, NGLs and Oil Sales, Production and Realized Price Calculations

The following table illustrates the revenue attributable to natural gas, NGLs and oil sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:

 

 

Our production grew by approximately 7.0 Bcfe for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 over the same period in 2015 as we placed new wells into production, partially offset by natural decline and voluntary curtailment of our operated production earlier in the year. Our production for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 is set forth in the following table:

 

 

During the period, the Company was affected by revisions of prior estimates related to one of its non-operated partners that increased total net production by approximately 2.2 Bcfe, or 8 MMcfe per day, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

34

---

 

Our average realized price (including cash derivative settlements and firm third-party transportation costs) received during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $2.59 per Mcfe compared to $3.54 per Mcfe during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Because we record transportation costs on two separate bases, as required by U.S. GAAP, we believe computed final realized prices of production volumes should include the total impact of firm transportation expense. Our average realized price (including all derivative settlements and third-party firm transportation costs) calculation also includes all cash settlements for derivatives. Average sales price (excluding cash settled derivatives) does not include derivative settlements or third-party transportation costs which are reported in transportation, gathering and compression expense on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. Average sales price (excluding cash settled derivatives) does include transportation costs where we receive net revenue proceeds from purchasers. Average realized price calculations for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 are shown below:

 

 

During the period, the Company was affected by revisions of prior estimates related to one of its non-operated partners that decreased natural gas realized prices by approximately $0.09 per Mcf and increased NGL prices by $0.24 per Bbl for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Brokered natural gas and marketing revenue was $10.4 million and $15.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  Brokered natural gas and marketing revenue includes revenue received from selling natural gas not related to production and from the release of firm transportation capacity.  The decrease from the prior year to the current year is due to increased utilization of our firm transportation capacity for operated production during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, which resulted in a decrease in the amount of firm transportation that was available for brokered gas transactions or release to third parties.  

35

---

 

Costs and Expenses

We believe some of our expense fluctuations are most accurately analyzed on a unit-of-production, or per Mcfe, basis. The following table presents these expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:

 

 

 

Lease operating expense was $7.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $10.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Lease operating expense per Mcfe was $0.12 in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $0.19 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015.  The decrease of $3.0 million and $0.07 per Mcfe is attributable to reduced personnel costs, in part due to the sale of our Conventional oil and gas properties, and additional cost-cutting measures during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015.  Lease operating expenses include normally recurring expenses to operate and produce our wells, non-recurring workovers and repairs.  We experience increases in operating expenses as we add new wells and manage existing properties      .

Transportation, gathering and compression expense was $78.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $57.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015.  Transportation, gathering and compression expense per Mcfe was $1.30 in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $1.09 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015.  These third-party costs were higher in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 due to our production growth where we have third party gathering and compression agreements and increased firm transportation expenses, which increased due primarily to additional capacity that came online during 2015 and 2016.  In addition, we revised our estimate of amounts due to a non-operated partner for such costs based on additional information received during the period, resulting in an increase of $5.8 million     .  The following table details our transportation, gathering and compression expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:

 

 

Production and ad valorem taxes are paid based on market prices and applicable tax rates. Production and ad valorem taxes were $1.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $8.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Production and ad valorem taxes per Mcfe was $0.03 in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $0.16 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015.  Production and ad valorem taxes decreased from the nine months ended September 30, 2015 to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 due to a reduction in our estimated accruals of approximately $4 million based on recent historical experience and additional information received during the period       .

36

---

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization was approximately $64.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $170.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015 is due to the decrease in proved property costs from impairment charges taken during 2015. On a per Mcfe basis, DD&A decreased to $1.07 in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 from $3.20 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015, which was predominantly driven by the lower depletion rate resulting from our reduced proved property costs.

General and administrative expense was $29.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $38.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.  General and administrative expense per Mcfe was $0.49 in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $0.72 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015.  The decrease of $8.7 million and $0.23 per Mcfe during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 when compared to nine months ended September 30, 2015 was primarily due to lower salaries and benefits associated with reduced headcount, in part due to the sale of our Conventional oil and gas properties as of September 30, 2016 as compared to September 30, 2015      .

Other Operating Expenses

Our total operating expenses also include other expenses that generally do not trend with production. The following table details our other operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:

 

 

Brokered natural gas and marketing expense was $11.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $20.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.  Brokered natural gas and marketing expenses relate to gas purchases that we buy and sell not relating to production and firm transportation capacity that is marketed to third parties.  The decrease from the prior year to the current year is due to increased utilization of our firm transport capacity for operated production during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, which resulted in a decrease in the amount of firm transportation that was available for brokered gas transactions or release to third parties.

Exploration expense was $45.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $22.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The following table details our exploration-related expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:

 

 

Impairment of unproved properties was $28.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $7.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. We assess individually significant unproved properties for impairment and recognize a loss where circumstances indicate impairment in value. In determining whether a significant unproved property is impaired we consider numerous factors, including, but not limited to, current exploration plans, favorable or unfavorable activity on the property being evaluated and/or adjacent properties, our geologists’ evaluation of the property and the remaining months in the lease term for the property. Impairment of individually insignificant unproved properties is assessed and amortized on an aggregate basis based on our average holding period, expected forfeiture rate and anticipated drilling success. As we continue to review our acreage positions and high grade our drilling inventory based on the current price environment, additional leasehold impairments and abandonments may be recorded.

37

---

 

    Rig termination and standby expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $3.8 million related primarily to standby costs that we incurred from temporarily suspending our drilling operations for a portion of the period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, rig termination and standby expenses were $7.6 million related primarily to rig termination expenses.

Impairment of proved oil and gas properties was $17.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 related to our properties in the Marcellus Shale. An analysis of proved properties determined the future undiscounted cash flows were less than the carrying value for certain asset groupings. An impairment expense was recognized for these asset groupings based on the difference between the fair market value and carrying value of the asset groupings. No impairment of proved oil and gas properties was recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Accretion of asset retirement obligations was $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $1.2 million for nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease in accretion expense primarily relates to the sale of our conventional assets and liabilities during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 .

Other Income (Expense)

Gain (loss) on derivative instruments was ($8.4) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $31.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Cash receipts were approximately $35.9 million and $23.8 million for derivative instruments that settled during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, respectively.

Interest expense, net was $38.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $40.2 million for nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease in interest expense was due to a lower interest rate on our Notes and reduced interest from the repurchase of long term debt during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Gain on early extinguishment of debt was $14.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 resulting from the repurchase of $39.5 million of our outstanding Notes on the open market for $23.4 million during such period. The outstanding Notes principal repurchased less cash proceeds and unamortized debt discount and deferred financing costs of $1.6 million were charged to gain on early extinguishment of debt.

Income tax expense (benefit) was $0.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to income tax benefit of ($52.3) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The reduction of income tax benefit recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to the similar period of the prior year was due to the Company recording a higher valuation allowance during the current period due to its recurring pre-tax losses.

Cash Flows, Capital Resources and Liquidity

Cash Flows

Cash flows from operations are primarily affected by production volumes and commodity prices. Our cash flows from operations also are impacted by changes in working capital. Short-term liquidity needs are satisfied by our operating cash flow, proceeds from asset sales, borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility and proceeds from issuances of debt and equity securities.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015

Net cash provided by (used in) operations in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was ($28.5) million compared to $60.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease in cash provided from operating activities reflects the decrease in commodity prices over year-over-year comparative periods, working capital changes, and the timing of cash receipts and disbursements.

Net cash used in investing activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $78.2 million compared to $374.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we:

38

---

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we:

Net cash provided by financing activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $99.9 million compared to $474.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we:

During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we:

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our main sources of liquidity and capital resources are internally generated cash flow from operations, asset sales, borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility and access to the debt and equity capital markets. We must find new and develop existing reserves to maintain and grow our production and cash flows. We accomplish this primarily through successful drilling programs which require substantial capital expenditures. We periodically review capital expenditures and adjust our budget based on liquidity, drilling results, leasehold acquisition opportunities, and commodity prices. We believe that our existing cash on hand, the net proceeds we received from our completed common stock offering, operating cash flow and available borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility will be adequate to meet our capital and operating requirements for 2016.

Future success in growing reserves and production will be highly dependent on capital resources available and the success of finding or acquiring additional reserves. We will continue using net cash on hand, cash flows from operations, borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility, and the net proceeds we received from our completed common stock offering to satisfy near-term financial obligations and liquidity needs, and as necessary, we will seek additional sources of debt or equity to fund these requirements. Longer-term cash flows are subject to a number of variables including the level of production and prices we receive for our production as well as various economic conditions that have historically affected the natural gas and oil business. Our ability to expand our reserve base is, in part, dependent on obtaining sufficient capital through internal cash flow, bank borrowings, asset sales or the issuance of debt or equity securities. There can be no assurance that internal cash flow and other capital sources will provide sufficient funds to maintain capital expenditures that we believe are necessary to offset inherent declines in production and proven reserves.

As of September 30, 2016, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants under the Credit Agreement governing our Revolving Credit Facility and the Indenture governing our 8.875% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2023. Further, based on our current forecast and activity levels, we expect to remain in compliance with all such debt covenants for the next twelve months. However, if oil and natural gas prices remain at current levels for longer than we expect, or fall to lower levels, we are likely to generate lower operating cash flows, which would make it more difficult for us to remain in compliance with all of our debt covenants, including requirements with respect to working capital and interest coverage ratios. This could negatively impact our ability to maintain sufficient liquidity and access to capital resources.

Credit Arrangements

Long-term debt at September 30, 2016, excluding discount, totaled $510.5 million and at December 31, 2015 totaled $550.0 million. We redeemed all of the outstanding Senior PIK Notes on July 13, 2015 for approximately $510.7 million, including outstanding principal balance, a make-whole premium and accrued interest. (See Note 7—Debt).

39

---

 

On July 6, 2015, we issued $550 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.875% senior notes due 2023 (the “Notes”) at an issue price of 97.903% of the principal amount of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and other initial purchasers. In this private offering, the Notes were sold for cash to qualified institutional buyers in the United States pursuant to Rule 144A of the Securities Act and to persons outside the United States in compliance with Regulation S under the Securities Act. Upon closing, we received proceeds of approximately $525.5 million, after deducting original issue discount, the initial purchasers’ discounts and estimated offering expenses, of which we used approximately $510.5 million to finance the redemption of all of our outstanding 12.0% Senior PIK notes due 2018. We intend to use the remaining net proceeds to fund our capital expenditure plan and for general corporate purposes. (See Note 7—Debt).

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company repurchased $39.5 million of the outstanding Notes in open market purchases for $23.4 million. The outstanding principal of the Notes that were repurchased less cash proceeds and unamortized debt discount and deferred financing costs of $1.6 million were charged to gain on early extinguishment of debt, totaling $14.5 million.   

The Indenture governing the Notes contains covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to: (i) incur additional indebtedness, (ii) pay dividends on capital stock or redeem, repurchase or retire our capital stock or subordinated indebtedness, (iii) transfer or sell assets, (iv) make investments, (v) create certain liens, (vi) enter into agreements that restrict dividends or other payments to the Company from its restricted subsidiaries, (vii) consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of the assets of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (viii) engage in transactions with affiliates, and (ix) create unrestricted subsidiaries. These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications set forth in the Indenture. In addition, if the Notes achieve an investment grade rating from either Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, and no default under the Indenture has then occurred and is continuing, many of such covenants will be suspended. The Indenture also contains events of default, which include, among others and subject in certain cases to grace and cure periods, nonpayment of principal or interest, failure by the Company to comply with its other obligations under the Indenture, payment defaults and accelerations with respect to certain other indebtedness of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries, failure of any guarantee on the Notes to be enforceable, and certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency. We were in compliance with all covenants at September 30, 2016.

We have also entered into a $500 million Revolving Credit Facility, which matures on January 15, 2018 and is governed by a Credit Agreement that includes customary affirmative and negative covenants. The borrowing base under our Revolving Credit Facility is $125 million. After giving effect to our outstanding letters of credit issued, totaling $31.2 million, we had available borrowing capacity under our Revolving Credit Facility of $93.8 million at September 30, 2016. The borrowing base under our Revolving Credit Facility is scheduled to be redetermined semi-annually (in April and October).  Our most recent borrowing base redetermination was completed during October 2016, which resulted in no change to the borrowing base under the Revolving Credit Facility.  Subsequent to September 30, 2016, we posted a letter of credit for $3.3 million related to firm transportation commitments, which reduced our available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility to $90.5 million.

On February 24, 2016, we amended the Credit Agreement governing our Revolving Credit Facility to, among other things, adjust our quarterly minimum interest coverage ratio, which is the ratio of EBITDAX to Cash Interest Expense, and to permit the sale of certain conventional properties. The amendment to the Credit Agreement also increased the Applicable Margin (as defined in the Credit Agreement) applicable to loans and letter of credit participation fees under the Credit Agreement by 0.5% and required us to, within 60 days of the effectiveness of the amendment, execute and deliver additional mortgages on our oil and gas properties that include at least 90% of our proved reserves.

Commodity Hedging Activities

Our primary market risk exposure is in the prices we receive for our natural gas, NGLs and oil production. Realized pricing is primarily driven by the spot regional market prices applicable to our U.S. natural gas, NGLs and oil production. Pricing for natural gas, NGLs and oil production has been volatile and unpredictable for several years, and we expect this volatility to continue in the future. The prices we receive for production depend on many factors outside of our control, including volatility in the differences between product prices at sales points and the applicable index price.

To mitigate the potential negative impact on our cash flow caused by changes in natural gas, NGLs and oil prices, we may enter into financial commodity derivative contracts to ensure that we receive minimum prices for a portion of our future natural gas production when management believes that favorable future prices can be secured. We typically hedge the NYMEX Henry Hub price for natural gas and the WTI price for oil.

40

---

 

Our hedging activities are intended to support natural gas, NGLs and oil prices at targeted levels and to manage our exposure to price fluctuations. The counterparty is required to make a payment to us for the difference between the floor price specified in the contract and the settlement price, which is based on market prices on the settlement date, if the settlement price is below the floor price. We are required to make a payment to the counterparty for the difference between the ceiling price and the settlement price if the ceiling price is below the settlement price. These contracts may include price swaps whereby we will receive a fixed price for our production and pay a variable market price to the contract counterparty, zero cost collars that set a floor and ceiling price for the hedged production, and puts which require us to pay a premium either up front or at settlement and allow us to receive a fixed price at our option if the put price is above the market price. As of September 30, 2016, we had entered into the following derivative contracts:

Natural Gas Derivatives

 

 

Oil Derivatives

 

 

41

---

 

NGL Derivatives

 

 

By using derivative instruments to hedge exposures to changes in commodity prices, we expose ourselves to the credit risk of our counterparties. Credit risk is the potential failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty is expected to owe us, which creates credit risk. To minimize the credit risk in derivative instruments, it is our policy to enter into derivative contracts only with counterparties that are creditworthy financial institutions deemed by management as competent and competitive market makers. The creditworthiness of our counterparties is subject to periodic review. We have derivative instruments in place with Bank of Montreal, Citibank, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Key Bank NA. We believe both institutions currently are an acceptable credit risk. As of September 30, 2016, we did not have any past due receivables from such counterparties.

A sensitivity analysis has been performed to determine the incremental effect on future earnings, related to open derivative instruments at September 30, 2016. A hypothetical 10 percent decrease in future natural gas prices would increase future earnings related to derivatives by $23.7 million. Similarly, a hypothetical 10 percent increase in future natural gas prices would decrease future earnings related to derivatives by $24.5 million. A hypothetical 10 percent decrease in future oil prices would increase future earnings related to derivatives by $4.4 million. Similarly, a hypothetical 10 percent increase in future oil prices would decrease future earnings related to derivatives by $5.2 million.

Subsequent to September 30, 2016, we entered into the following derivative instruments to mitigate our exposure to natural gas and oil prices:

 

 

Capital Requirements

Our primary needs for cash are for exploration, development and acquisition of natural gas and oil properties and repayment of principal and interest on outstanding debt. As a result of the increase in commodity forward prices during the second quarter of 2016, we increased our 2016 capital expenditure budget by approximately 17 percent, or $28 million, from $167.8 million to $196 million.  We expect to fund our capital expenditures for 2016 with cash generated by operations, the net proceeds we received from our completed common stock offering, borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility, proceeds from asset sales, and proceeds from additional debt or equity offerings. The actual amount and timing of our future capital expenditures may differ materially from our estimates as a result of, among other things, natural gas, NGLs and oil prices, actual drilling results, the availability of drilling rigs and other services and equipment, and regulatory, technological and competitive developments. A reduction in natural gas, NGLs or oil prices from current levels may result in a further decrease in our actual capital expenditures, which would negatively impact our ability to grow production and our proved reserves as well as our ability to maintain compliance with our debt covenants. Our financing needs may require us to alter or increase our capitalization substantially through the issuance of debt or equity securities or the sale of assets.

In addition, we may from time to time seek to pay down, retire or repurchase our outstanding debt using cash or through exchanges of other debt or equity securities, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on available funds, prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions in our revolving credit agreement and other factors.

42

---

 

Capitalization

As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, our total debt, excluding debt discount, and capitalization were as follows (in millions):

 

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company repurchased and retired $39.5 million of the outstanding Notes on the open market for $23.4 million.

Cash Contractual Obligations

Our contractual obligations include long-term debt, operating leases, drilling commitments, firm transportation, gas processing, gathering, and compressions services and asset retirement obligations. As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we did not have any capital leases, any significant off-balance sheet debt or other such unrecorded obligations, and we have not guaranteed any debt of any unrelated party. Our condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2016 reflects accrued interest payable of $9.7 million, compared to $23.8 million as of December 31, 2015.

Other

We lease acreage that is generally subject to lease expiration if operations are not commenced within a specified period, generally five years. However, based on our evaluation of prospective economics, including the cost of infrastructure to connect production, we have allowed acreage to expire and will allow additional acreage to expire in the future. To date, our expenditures to comply with environmental or safety regulations have not been a significant component of our cost structure and are not expected to be significant in the future. However, new regulations, enforcement policies, claims for damages or other events could result in significant future costs.

Interest Rates

At September 30, 2016, we had $510.5 million as compared to $550.0 million as of December 31, 2015, of Senior Unsecured Notes outstanding, excluding discounts, which bear interest at a fixed cash rate of 8.875% and is due semi-annually from the date of issuance.

On July 6, 2015, we issued $550 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.875% senior notes due 2023 at an issue price of 97.903% of the principal amount of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and other initial purchasers. In this private offering, the Notes were sold for cash to qualified institutional buyers in the United States pursuant to Rule 144A of the Securities Act and to persons outside the United States in compliance with Regulation S under the Securities Act. Upon closing, we received proceeds of approximately $525.5 million, after deducting original issue discount, the initial purchasers’ discounts and estimated offering expenses, of which we used approximately $510.7 million to finance the redemption of all of our outstanding Senior PIK Notes on July 13, 2015. We intend to use the remaining net proceeds to fund our capital expenditure plan and for general corporate purposes.

We have also entered into a $500 million senior secured revolving bank credit facility, which matures in 2018. Borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility are subject to borrowing base limitations based on the collateral value of our proved properties and commodity hedge positions and are subject semiannual redeterminations. The borrowing base under our Revolving Credit Facility is $125 million. After giving effect to our outstanding letters of credit, totaling $31.2 million, we had available borrowing capacity under our Revolving Credit Facility of $93.8 million at September 30, 2016.  Our most recent borrowing base redetermination was completed during October 2016, which resulted in no change to the borrowing base under the Revolving Credit Facility.  Subsequent to September 30, 2016, we posted a letter of credit for $3.3 million related to firm transportation commitments, which reduced our available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility to $90.5 million.

43

---

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not currently utilize any off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities to enhance our liquidity or capital resource position, or for any other purpose. However, as is customary in the oil and gas industry, we have various contractual work commitments which are described above under “—Cash Contractual Obligations.”

Inflation and Changes in Prices

Our revenues, the value of our assets and our ability to obtain bank loans or additional capital on attractive terms have been and will continue to be affected by changes in natural gas, NGLs and oil prices and the costs to produce our reserves. Natural gas, NGLs and oil prices are subject to significant fluctuations that are beyond our ability to control or predict. Although certain of our costs and expenses are affected by general inflation, it does not normally have a significant effect on our business. We expect our costs in fiscal 2016 to continue to be a function of supply and demand.

Non-GAAP Financial Measure

“Adjusted EBITDAX” is a non-GAAP financial measure that we define as net income (loss) before interest expense or interest income; income taxes; write-down of abandoned leases; impairments; DD&A; amortization of deferred financing costs; gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net cash receipts (payments) on settled derivative instruments, and premiums (paid) received on options that settled during the period; non-cash compensation expense; gain or loss from sale of interest in gas properties; exploration expenses; and other unusual or infrequent items. Adjusted EBITDAX, as used and defined by us, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies and is not a measure of performance calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Adjusted EBITDAX should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for operating income, net income or loss, cash flows provided by operating, investing and financing activities, or other income or cash flow statement data prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Adjusted EBITDAX provides no information regarding a company’s capital structure, borrowings, interest costs, capital expenditures, and working capital movement or tax position. Adjusted EBITDAX does not represent funds available for discretionary use because those funds may be required for debt service, capital expenditures, working capital, income taxes, franchise taxes, exploration expenses, and other commitments and obligations. However, our management team believes Adjusted EBITDAX is useful to an investor in evaluating our financial performance because this measure:

44

---

 

There are significant limitations to using Adjusted EBITDAX as a measure of performance, including the inability to analyze the effect of certain recurring and non-recurring items that materially affect our net income or loss, the lack of comparability of results of operations of different companies and the different methods of calculating Adjusted EBITDAX reported by different companies. The following table represents a reconciliation of our net loss from operations to Adjusted EBITDAX for the periods presented:

 

 

Critical Accounting Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of our critical accounting policies.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company’s critical accounting policies are described in Note 3 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. Information related to recent accounting pronouncements is described in Note 3 to our condensed consolidated financial statements and is incorporated herein by reference.

The primary objective of the following information is to provide forward-looking quantitative and qualitative information about our potential exposure to market risks. The term “market risk” refers to the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in natural gas, NGLs and oil prices and interest rates. The disclosures are not meant to be precise indicators of expected future losses, but rather indicators of reasonably possible losses. This forward-looking information provides indicators of how we view and manage our ongoing market-risk exposure. All of our market-risk sensitive instruments were entered into for purposes other than trading. All accounts are U.S. dollar denominated.

Commodity Price Risk

We are exposed to market risks related to the volatility of natural gas, NGLs and oil prices. Realized prices are primarily driven by worldwide prices for oil and spot market prices for North American gas production. Natural gas and oil prices have been volatile and unpredictable for many years. Natural gas prices affect us more than oil prices because approximately 79% of our December 31, 2015 proved reserves were natural gas.

For a discussion of how we use financial commodity derivative contracts to mitigate some of the potential negative impact on our cash flow caused by changes in natural gas prices, see “Note 5—Derivative Instruments.”

45

---

 

Interest Rate Risk

On July 6, 2015, we issued $550 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.875% senior notes due 2023 at an issue price of 97.903% of the principal amount of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. At September 30, 2016, the cash interest rate with respect to the Notes was fixed at 8.875%, and interest is due semi-annually from the date of issuance, in January and July.

We will be exposed to interest rate risk in the future if we draw on our Revolving Credit Facility. Interest on outstanding borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility will accrue based on, at our option, LIBOR or the alternate base rate, in each case, plus an applicable margin that is determined based on our utilization of commitments under our Revolving Credit Facility. As of September 30, 2016, the borrowing base was $125 million and we had no outstanding borrowings. After giving effect to our outstanding letters of credit, totaling $31.2 million, we had available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility of $93.8 million at September 30, 2016.  Subsequent to September 30, 2016, we posted a letter of credit for $3.3 million related to firm transportation commitments, which reduced our available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility to $90.5 million.

Counterparty and Customer Credit Risk

Our principal exposures to credit risk are through receivables resulting from commodity derivatives contracts, the sale of our oil and gas production which we market to energy companies, end users and refineries, and joint interest receivables.

We are exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties. The creditworthiness of counterparties is subject to periodic review. We have not experienced any issues of nonperformance by derivative counterparties. We believe that all of these institutions currently are acceptable credit risks. Other than as provided by our revolving credit facility, we are not required to provide credit support or collateral to any of our counterparties under our derivative contracts, nor are they required to provide credit support to us. As of September 30, 2016, we did not have past-due receivables from, or payables to, any of the counterparties to our derivative contracts.

We are also subject to credit risk due to concentration of our receivables from several significant customers for sales of natural gas. We, generally, do not require our customers to post collateral. The inability or failure of our significant customers to meet their obligations to us or their insolvency or liquidation may adversely affect our financial results.

Joint interest receivables arise from billing entities who own partial interest in the wells we operate. These entities participate in our wells primarily based on their ownership in leased properties on which we wish to drill. We can do very little to choose who participates in our wells.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management carried out an evaluation (as required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act), with the participation of the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon this evaluation, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, such that the information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Controls

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the period covered by this Quarterly Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

46

---

 

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Information regarding the Company’s legal proceedings is set forth in “Note 12—Commitments and Contingencies,” located in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and is incorporated herein by reference.

In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 4, 2016, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, and/or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

See the list of exhibits in the index to exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which is incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

47

---

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

48

---

 

ECLIPSE RESOURCES CORPORATION

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 

 

 

49