Attached files

file	filename
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - ATEL 15, LLC	v446233_exh32x2.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - ATEL 15, LLC	v446233_exh32x1.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - ATEL 15, LLC	v446233_exh31x2.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - ATEL 15, LLC	v446233_exh31x1.htm

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


x		Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016


o		Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the transition period from to

Commission File number 333-174418

ATEL 15, LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


California		45-1625956
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization)		(I. R. S. Employer Identification No.)

The Transamerica Pyramid, 600 Montgomery Street, 9th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (415) 989-8800

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: Limited Liability Company Units

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x

The number of Limited Liability Company Units outstanding as of July 31, 2016 was 6,606,921.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

Index


Part I. Financial Information			3
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)			3
Balance Sheets, June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015			3
Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015			4
Statements of Changes in Members’ Capital for the year ended December 31, 2015 and for the six months ended June 30, 2016			5
Statements of Cash Flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015			6
Notes to the Financial Statements			7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			26
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			31
Part II. Other Information			32
Item 1. Legal Proceedings			32
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			32
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities			32
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures			32
Item 5. Other Information			32
Item 6. Exhibits			32

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited).

ATEL 15, LLC

BALANCE SHEETS

JUNE 30, 2016 AND DECEMBER 31, 2015
(in thousands)


	June 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	4,198	$	5,623
Accounts receivable, net		152		101
Notes receivable, net		1,071		1,780
Investment in securities		317		283
Fair value of warrants		771		770
Investments in equipment and leases, net		37,817		41,552
Prepaid expenses and other assets		88		31
Total assets	$	44,414	$	50,140
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS’ CAPITAL
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
Managing Member	$	50	$	51
Affiliates		52		21
Accrued distributions to Other Members		622		623
Other		310		233
Non-recourse debt		10,819		13,362
Long-term debt		2,068		2,068
Unearned operating lease income and/or advance payments		193		345
Total liabilities		14,114		16,703
Commitments and contingencies
Members’ capital:
Managing Member		—		—
Other Members		30,300		33,437
Total Members’ capital		30,300		33,437
Total liabilities and Members’ capital	$	44,414	$	50,140

See accompanying notes.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 AND 2015
(in thousands except units and per unit data)
(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Revenues:
Leasing and lending activities:
Operating leases	$	2,339		$	2,534		$	4,761		$	5,062
Direct financing leases		2			—			3			—
Interest on notes receivable		40			94			92			200
Gain on sales of lease assets and early termination of notes		—			—			28			68
Gain on sales or dispositions of investment in securities		—			6			—			6
Unrealized (loss) gain on fair valuation of warrants		(3	)		50			1			50
Other		4			7			8			25
Total revenues		2,382			2,691			4,893			5,411
Expenses:
Depreciation of operating lease assets		1,778			2,004			3,587			3,989
Asset management fees to Managing Member		101			110			221			250
Acquisition expense		2			—			3			(29	)
Cost reimbursements to Managing Member and/or affiliates		214			330			434			704
Provision for credit losses		—			10			7			37
Amortization of initial direct costs		28			31			57			63
Interest expense		106			144			220			286
Professional fees		22			16			99			79
Outside services		15			12			35			29
Railcar maintenance		(3	)		22			28			60
Bank charges		23			43			60			94
Other		32			33			65			93
Total expenses		2,318			2,755			4,816			5,655
Net income (loss)	$	64		$	(64	)	$	77		$	(244	)
Net income (loss):
Managing Member	$	120		$	120		$	241		$	241
Other Members		(56	)		(184	)		(164	)		(485	)
	$	64		$	(64	)	$	77		$	(244	)
Net loss per Limited Liability Company Unit (Other Members)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.07	)
Weighted average number of Units outstanding		6,606,921			6,614,699			6,606,921			6,614,959

See accompanying notes.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS’ CAPITAL

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015
AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2016
(in thousands except units and per unit data)


	Units			Amount						Total
	Units			Other Members			Managing Member			Total
Balance December 31, 2014		6,615,221		$	40,312		$	—		$	40,312
Rescissions of Units		(800	)		(6	)		—			(6	)
Repurchases of Units		(7,500	)		(45	)		—			(45	)
Distributions to Other Members ($0.90 per Unit)		—			(5,949	)		—			(5,949	)
Distributions to Managing Member		—			—			(482	)		(482	)
Net (loss) income		—			(875	)		482			(393	)
Balance December 31, 2015		6,606,921			33,437			—			33,437
Distributions to Other Members ($0.45 per Unit)		—			(2,973	)		—			(2,973	)
Distributions to Managing Member		—			—			(241	)		(241	)
Net (loss) income		—			(164	)		241			77
Balance June 30, 2016 (Unaudited)		6,606,921		$	30,300		$	—		$	30,300

See accompanying notes.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2016 AND 2015
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	64		$	(64	)	$	77		$	(244	)
Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities:
Gain on sales of lease assets and early termination of notes		—			—			(28	)		(68	)
Depreciation of operating lease assets		1,778			2,004			3,587			3,989
Amortization of initial direct costs		28			31			57			63
Provision for credit losses		—			10			7			37
Gain on sales or dispositions of investment in securities		—			(6	)		—			(6	)
Unrealized loss (gain) on fair valuation of warrants		3			(50	)		(1	)		(50	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(14	)		32			(53	)		47
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(19	)		18			(57	)		9
Accounts payable, Managing Member		(1	)		—			(1	)		(2	)
Accrued distributions to Other Members		(1	)		—			(1	)		—
Accounts payable, other		54			(3	)		77			10
Accrued liabilities, affiliates		(80	)		154			31			(587	)
Unearned fee income related to notes receivable		(1	)		(4	)		(2	)		(8	)
Unearned operating lease income and/or advance payments		(285	)		(326	)		(152	)		(93	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,526			1,796			3,541			3,097
Investing activities:
Purchases of equipment on operating leases		—			(443	)		—			(798	)
Purchase of securities		(17	)		—			(34	)		—
Proceeds from sales of lease assets and early termination of notes		35			—			121			101
Proceeds from sale of securities		—			6			—			6
Payments of initial direct costs		—			(12	)		—			(42	)
Principal payments received on direct financing leases		—			—			—			13
Principal payments received on notes receivable		345			387			704			890
Net cash provided (used in) by investing activities		363			(62	)		791			170
Financing activities:
Borrowings under non-recourse debt		—			—			—			1,558
Repayments under non-recourse debt		(1,276	)		(1,438	)		(2,543	)		(2,650	)
Distributions to Other Members		(1,487	)		(1,488	)		(2,973	)		(2,978	)
Distributions to Managing Member		(120	)		(120	)		(241	)		(241	)
Rescissions of Units		—			(6	)		—			(6	)
Repurchases of Units		—			(3	)		—			(3	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(2,883	)		(3,055	)		(5,757	)		(4,320	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(994	)		(1,321	)		(1,425	)		(1,053	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		5,192			7,482			5,623			7,214
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	4,198		$	6,161		$	4,198		$	6,161
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	86		$	125		$	181		$	249
Cash paid during the period for taxes	$	9		$	20		$	11		$	22
Schedule of non-cash investing and financing transactions:
Distributions payable to Other Members at period-end	$	622		$	623		$	622		$	623
Distributions payable to Managing Member at period-end	$	50		$	50		$	50		$	50

See accompanying notes.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

1. Organization and Limited Liability Company matters:

ATEL 15, LLC (the “Company” or the “Fund”) was formed under the laws of the state of California on March 4, 2011 for the purpose of raising capital and originating equipment financing transactions and acquiring equipment to engage in equipment leasing and sales activities. The Managing Member of the Company is ATEL Managing Member, LLC (the “Managing Member” or the “Manager”), a Nevada limited liability company. The Managing Member is controlled by ATEL Financial Services (“AFS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group. The Fund may continue until terminated as provided in the ATEL 15, LLC Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement dated October 28, 2011 (the “Operating Agreement”). Contributions in the amount of $500 were received as of May 3, 2011, which represented the initial Member’s capital investment. As a limited liability company, the liability of any individual member for the obligations of the Fund is limited to the extent of capital contributions to the Fund by the individual member. The offering of the Company was granted effectiveness by the Securities and Exchange Commission as of October 28, 2011.

Through June 30, 2016, cumulative contributions of $66.5 million (inclusive of the $500 initial Member’s capital investment), representing 6,653,171 Units, have been received. Through the same date, a net total of $334 thousand of such contributions (representing 46,250 Units) have been rescinded or repurchased (net of distributions paid and allocated syndication costs) by the Company. As of June 30, 2016, 6,606,921 Units were issued and outstanding.

The Company is governed by its Operating Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Operating Agreement, the Managing Member and/or its affiliates receives compensation for services rendered and reimbursements for costs incurred on behalf of the Company (See Note 6). The Company is required to maintain reasonable cash reserves for working capital, the repurchase of Units and contingencies. The repurchase of Units is solely at the discretion of the Managing Member.

These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in the report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

2. Summary of significant accounting policies:

Basis of presentation:

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q as mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of the Managing Member, necessary for a fair statement of financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Certain prior period amounts may have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no significant effect on the reported financial position or results of operations.

Footnote and tabular amounts are presented in thousands, except as to Units and per Unit data.

In preparing the accompanying financial statements, the Company has reviewed, as determined necessary by the Managing Member, events that have occurred after June 30, 2016 up until the issuance of the financial statements. No events were noted which would require additional disclosure in the footnotes to the financial statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Use of Estimates:

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from the estimates. Such estimates primarily relate to the determination of residual values at the end of the lease term and expected future cash flows used for impairment analysis purposes and determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts and reserve for credit losses on notes receivable.

Segment reporting:

The Company is organized into one operating segment for the purpose of making operating decisions or assessing performance. Accordingly, the Company operates in one reportable operating segment in the United States.

The primary geographic region in which the Company seeks leasing and financing opportunities is North America. All of the Company’s current operating revenues and long-lived assets relate to customers domiciled in North America.

Accounts receivable

Accounts receivable represent the amounts billed under operating and direct financing lease contracts, and notes receivable which are currently due to the Company.

Allowances for doubtful accounts are typically established based upon their aging and historical charge off and collection experience and the creditworthiness of specifically identified lessees and borrowers, and invoiced amounts. Accounts receivable deemed uncollectible are generally charged off against the allowance on a specific identification basis. Recoveries of amounts that were previously written-off are recorded as other income in the period received.

Accounts receivable are generally placed in a non-accrual status (i.e., no revenue is recognized) when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, management periodically reviews the creditworthiness of companies with lease or note payments outstanding less than 90 days. Based upon management’s judgment, such leases or notes may be placed in non-accrual status. Leases or notes placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid receivable is probable. Until such time, revenues on operating leases are recognized on a cash basis. All payments received on amounts billed under direct financing leases and notes receivable are applied only against outstanding principal balances.

Financing receivables

In addition to the allowance established for delinquent accounts receivable, the total allowance related solely to financing receivables also includes anticipated impairment charges on notes receivable and direct financing leases.

Notes are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal and/or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the note agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest when due. If it is determined that a loan is impaired with regard to scheduled payments, the Company will perform an analysis of the note to determine if an impairment valuation reserve is necessary. This analysis

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

considers the estimated cash flows from the note, or the collateral value of the property underlying the note when note repayment is collateral dependent. Any required valuation reserve is charged to earnings when determined; and notes are charged off to the allowance as they are deemed uncollectible.

The asset underlying a direct financing lease contract is considered impaired if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than its net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the estimated residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s expected holding period and estimates of undiscounted future rents. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the market place are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the asset and its carrying value on the measurement date.

Investment in securities:

From time to time, the Company may purchase securities of its borrowers or receive warrants to purchase securities in connection with its lending arrangements.

Purchased securities

Purchased securities are generally not registered for public sale and are carried at cost. Such securities are adjusted to fair value if the fair value is less than the carrying value and such impairment is deemed by the Managing Member to be other than temporary. Factors considered by the Managing Member in determining fair value include, but are not limited to, available financial information, the issuer’s ability to meet its current obligations and indications of the issuer’s subsequent ability to raise capital. The Company had $317 thousand and $283 thousand of purchased securities at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. There were no sales or dispositions of purchased securities during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.

Warrants

Warrants owned by the Company are not registered for public sale, but are considered derivatives and are reflected at an estimated fair value on the balance sheet, as determined by the Managing Member. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company recorded an unrealized loss of $3 thousand and unrealized gain of $1 thousand, respectively on fair valuation of its warrants. By comparison, the Company recorded unrealized gains of $50 thousand each on fair valuations of its warrants during the respective prior year periods. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the estimated fair value of the Company’s portfolio of warrants amounted to $771 thousand and $770 thousand, respectively. There were no exercises of warrants, net or otherwise, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. The Company recognized gains on the net exercise of warrants totaling $6 thousand for the both the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2015.

Per Unit data:

The Company issues only one class of Units, none of which are considered dilutive. Net income (loss) and distributions per Unit is based upon the weighted average number of Other Members Units outstanding during the period.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Fair Value:

Fair value measurements and disclosures are based on a fair value hierarchy as determined by significant inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of inputs within the fair value hierarchy are defined as follows:

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. An active market for the asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2 — Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in the market.

Level 3 — Valuation is modeled using significant inputs that are unobservable in the market. These unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The Company’s valuation policy is determined by members of the Asset Management, Credit and Accounting departments. Whenever possible, the policy is to obtain quoted market prices in active markets to estimate fair values for recognition and disclosure purposes. Where quoted market prices in active markets are not available, fair values are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, broker quotes, information from third party remarketing agents, third party appraisals of collateral and/or other valuation techniques. These techniques are significantly affected by certain of the Company’s assumptions, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows. Potential taxes and other transaction costs are not considered in estimating fair values. As the Company is responsible for determining fair value, an analysis is performed on prices obtained from third parties. Such analysis is performed by asset management and credit department personnel who are familiar with the Company’s investments in equipment, notes receivable and equity securities of venture companies. The analysis may include a periodic review of price fluctuations and validation of numbers obtained from a specific third party by reference to multiple representative sources.

Recent accounting pronouncements:

In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326) (“ASU 2016-13”). The main objective of this Update is to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. To achieve this objective, the amendments in this Update replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The amendments affect entities holding financial assets and net investment in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income. The amendments affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off-balance-sheet credit exposures, reinsurance receivables, and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Management is currently evaluating the standard and its operational and related disclosure requirements.

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). The new standard will require lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities arising from operating leases with lease terms greater than 12 months in the statement of financial position. Lessor accounting per ASU 2016-02 is mostly unchanged from the previous lease accounting GAAP. Certain changes were made to the lessor accounting guidance in order to align the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Similar to the previous guidance, lessors will classify leases as operating, direct financing, or sales-type. Lessors in operating leases will continue to recognize the underlying asset and recognize income on a straight-line basis. Lessors determine whether a lease is a sale of the underlying asset based on whether the lessee effectively obtains control of the underlying assets. ASU-2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the standard and its operational and related disclosure requirements.

In January 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-01, Financial Instruments — Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”). The new standard provides guidance related to accounting for equity investments and financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, FASB clarified guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. ASU 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is currently evaluating the standard and its operational and related disclosure requirements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU-2014-15”). The new standard provides guidance relative to management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. Management does not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-15 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements or related disclosures.

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is based on principles that govern the recognition of revenue at an amount an entity expects to be entitled when products are transferred to customers. On July 9, 2015, the FASB approved the deferral of the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year and in August 2015, issued Revenue from Contracts from Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU 2015-14”). ASU 2015-14 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. The Company evaluated the impact of the new standard on its financial statements and has determined that such impact is virtually non-existent as the new revenue guideline does not affect revenues from leases and loans, which comprise the majority of the Company’s revenues.

3. Notes receivable, net:

The Company has various notes receivables from borrowers who have financed the purchase of equipment through the Company. As of June 30, 2016, the terms of the notes receivable are from 30 to 48 months and bear interest at rates ranging from 11.26% to 18.00% per annum. The notes are secured by the equipment financed. The notes mature from 2016 through 2018.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

3. Notes receivable, net: - (continued)

Both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2016 had two notes receivable that were on non-accrual status. Details are as follows, in thousand, except for the number of notes receivable and the annual rate:


	Notes receivable
	Non-accrual
	June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Number of notes		2			2
Net investment value	$	75		$	81
Annual interest rate		18.00	%		18.00	%
Fair value adjustments	$	55		$	50
Fair value amount	$	20		$	31
Interest income not recorded relative to original terms	$	8		$	7


Date		Note modification
December 1, 2014		Notes placed on non-accrual status.
January 1, 2015		Defer payment of principal, interest-only payments at their original rates through June 30, 2015.
		Payments will be adjusted so ultimate amounts paid will reflect interest earned at 18% per annum related to the entire term from the original funding date.
1st quarter 2015		Impairment totaling $27 thousand was recorded.
3rd quarter 2015		Impairment totaling $23 thousand was recorded.
4th quarter 2015		Extend interest only payments through June 30, 2016.
		Entire balance on the notes due on July 1, 2016.
1st quarter 2016		Impairment totaling $5 thousand was recorded.
Current status		Payment on note outstanding balance has not been received.

As of June 30, 2016, the minimum future payments receivable are as follows (in thousands):


Six months ending December 31, 2016	$	806
Year ending December 31, 2017		380
2018		60
		1,246
Less: portion representing unearned interest income		(122	)
		1,124
Unamortized initial direct costs		2
Less: allowance for credit losses		(55	)
Notes receivable, net	$	1,071

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

3. Notes receivable, net: - (continued)

Initial direct costs (“IDC”) amortization expense related to notes receivable and the Company’s operating and direct financing leases for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
IDC amortization – notes receivable	$	1	$	3	$	2	$	7
IDC amortization – lease assets		27		28		55		56
Total	$	28	$	31	$	57	$	63

4. Allowance for credit losses:

The Company’s allowance for credit losses are as follows (in thousands):


	Accounts Receivable Allowance for Doubtful Accounts						Valuation Adjustments on Financing Receivables				Total Allowance for Credit Losses
	Notes Receivable		Finance Leases		Operating Leases		Notes Receivable		Finance Leases		Total Allowance for Credit Losses
Balance December 31, 2014	$	—	$	—	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	1
Provision for credit losses		—		—		1		50		—		51
Balance December 31, 2015		—		—		2		50		—		52
Provision for credit losses		—		1		1		5		—		7
Balance June 30, 2016	$	—	$	1	$	3	$	55	$	—	$	59

The Company’s allowance for credit losses (related solely to financing receivables) and its recorded investment in financing receivables as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were as follows (in thousands):


June 30, 2016	Notes Receivable		Finance Leases		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance	$	55	$	—	$	55
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	55	$	—	$	55
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—	$	—
Financing receivables:
Ending balance	$	1,126¹	$	10	$	1,136
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,126	$	10	$	1,136
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—	$	—

Includes $2 of unamortized initial direct costs.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

4. Allowance for credit losses: - (continued)


December 31, 2015	Notes Receivable		Finance Leases		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance	$	50	$	—	$	50
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	50	$	—	$	50
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—	$	—
Financing receivables:
Ending balance	$	1,830²	$	—	$	1,830
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,830	$	—	$	1,830
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—	$	—

Includes $3 of unamortized initial direct costs.

The Company evaluates the credit quality of its financing receivables on a scale equivalent to the following quality indicators related to corporate risk profiles:

Pass — Any account whose lessee/debtor, co-lessee/debtor or any guarantor has a credit rating on publicly traded or privately placed debt issues as rated by Moody’s or S&P for either Senior Unsecured debt, Long Term Issuer rating or Issuer rating that are in the tiers of ratings generally recognized by the investment community as constituting an Investment Grade credit rating; or, has been determined by the Manager to be an Investment Grade Equivalent or High Quality Corporate Credit per its Credit Policy or has a Not Rated internal rating by the Manager and the account is not considered by the Chief Credit Officer of the Manager to fall into one of the three risk profiles below.

Special Mention — Any traditional corporate type account with potential weaknesses (e.g. large net losses or major industry downturns) or, any growth capital account that has less than three months of cash as of the end of the calendar quarter to fund their continuing operations. These accounts deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, those potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the Fund’s receivable at some future date.

Substandard — Any account that is inadequately protected by the current worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. Accounts that are so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Fund will sustain some loss as the likelihood of fully collecting all receivables may be questionable if the deficiencies are not corrected. Such accounts are on the Manager’s Credit Watch List.

Doubtful — Any account where the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. Accordingly, an account that is so classified is on the Manager’s Credit Watch List, and has been declared in default and the Manager has repossessed, or is attempting to repossess, the equipment it financed. This category includes impaired notes and leases as applicable.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

4. Allowance for credit losses: - (continued)

At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company’s financing receivables by credit quality indicator and by class of financing receivables are as follows (excludes initial direct costs) (in thousands):


	Notes Receivable				Finance Leases
	June 30, 2016		December 31, 2015		June 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Pass	$	1,049	$	1,746	$	10	$	—
Special mention		—		—		—		—
Substandard		75		81		—		—
Doubtful		—		—		—		—
Total	$	1,124	$	1,827	$	10	$	—

As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company’s impaired loans were as follows (in thousands):


	June 30, 2016
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded Notes receivable	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
With an allowance recorded Notes receivable		75		75		55		77		—
Total	$	75	$	75	$	55	$	77	$	—


	December 31, 2015
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded Notes receivable	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
With an allowance recorded Notes receivable		81		81		50		85		—
Total	$	81	$	81	$	50	$	85	$	—

At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, investment in financing receivables is aged as follows (in thousands):


June 30, 2016	31 – 60 Days Past Due		61 – 90 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Financing Receivables		Recorded Investment > 90 Days and Accruing
Notes receivable	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,124	$	1,124	$	—
Finance leases		—		—		10		10		—		10		10
Total	$	—	$	—	$	10	$	10	$	1,124	$	1,134	$	10


December 31, 2015	31 – 60 Days Past Due		61 – 90 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Financing Receivables		Recorded Investment > 90 Days and Accruing
Notes receivable	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,827	$	1,827	$	—
Total	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,827	$	1,827	$	—

As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had two notes receivable which were on non-accrual status (see Note 3).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

5. Investment in equipment and leases, net:

The Company’s investment in leases consists of the following (in thousands):


	Balance December 31, 2015		Reclassifications & Additions/ Dispositions			Depreciation/ Amortization Expense or Amortization of Leases			Balance June 30, 2016
Net investment in operating leases	$	41,293	$	(105	)	$	(3,587	)	$	37,601
Net investment in direct financing leases		—		10			—			10
Assets held for sale or lease, net		—		2			—			2
Initial direct costs, net of accumulated amortization of $231 at June 30, 2016 and $187 at December 31, 2015		259		—			(55	)		204
Total	$	41,552	$	(93	)	$	(3,642	)	$	37,817

Impairment of investments in leases:

Recorded values of the Company’s leased asset portfolio are reviewed each quarter to confirm the reasonableness of established residual values and to determine whether there is indication that an asset impairment might have taken place.

The Company uses a variety of sources and considers many factors in evaluating whether the respective book values of its assets are appropriate. In addition, the Company may direct a residual value review at any time if it becomes aware of issues regarding the ability of a lessee to continue to make payments on its lease contract. An impairment loss is measured and recognized only if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than their net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s lease contract and undiscounted future rents from the existing lease contract, if any. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the marketplace are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the asset and its carrying value on the measurement date. Upward adjustments for impairments recognized in prior periods are not made in any circumstances. As a result of these reviews, management determined that no impairment losses existed during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.

The Company utilizes a straight-line depreciation method for equipment in all of the categories currently in its portfolio of lease transactions. Depreciation expense on the Company’s equipment was $1.8 million and $2.0 million for the respective three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 and was $3.6 million and $4.0 million for the respective six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. IDC amortization expense related to the Company’s operating leases and direct financing leases totaled $27 thousand and $55 thousand for the respective three and six months ended June 30, 2016, and $28 thousand and $56 thousand for the respective three and six months ended June 30, 2015 (see Note 3).

All of the Company’s leased property was acquired beginning in January 2012 through December 2015.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

5. Investment in equipment and leases, net: - (continued)

Operating leases:

Property on operating leases consists of the following (in thousands):


	Balance December 31, 2015			Additions			Reclassifications or Dispositions			Balance June 30, 2016
Marine vessel	$	19,410		$	—		$	—		$	19,410
Transportation, rail		10,927			—			—			10,927
Manufacturing		7,836			—			—			7,836
Food processing		5,200			—			—			5,200
Coal terminal		5,084			—			—			5,084
Materials handling		4,147			—			(408	)		3,739
Construction		2,590			—			—			2,590
Research		2,250			—			—			2,250
Agriculture		2,112			—			—			2,112
Aviation		722			—			—			722
Computer		251			—			(12	)		239
Transportation		48			—			—			48
Cleaning & maintenance		51			—			(51	)		—
		60,628			—			(471	)		60,157
Less accumulated depreciation		(19,335	)		(3,587	)		366			(22,556	)
Total	$	41,293		$	(3,587	)	$	(105	)	$	37,601

The average estimated residual value for assets on operating leases was 35% and 43% of the assets’ original cost at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The decrease was primarily the result of a renewal of an 18-month lease over a seven year period. There were no operating leases in non-accrual status as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

Direct financing leases:

As of June 30, 2016, investment in direct financing leases consists of materials handling equipment. The components of the Company’s investment in direct financing leases as of June 30, 2016 are as follows (in thousands):


	June 30, 2016
Total minimum lease payments receivable	$	21
Estimated residual values of leased equipment (unguaranteed)		1
Investment in direct financing leases		22
Less unearned income		(12	)
Net investment in direct financing leases	$	10

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

5. Investment in equipment and leases, net: - (continued)

As of December 31, 2015, the Company had no investment in direct financing leases. There were no investments in direct financing leases in non-accrual status at June 30, 2016.

At June 30, 2016, the aggregate amounts of future minimum lease payments receivable are as follows (in thousands):


	Operating Leases		Direct Financing Leases		Total
Six months ending December 31, 2016	$	3,678	$	3	$	3,681
Year ending December 31, 2017		5,908		6		5,914
2018		5,326		6		5,332
2019		2,471		6		2,477
2020		1,099		—		1,099
2021		884		—		884
Thereafter		884		—		884
	$	20,250	$	21	$	20,271

The useful lives for each category of leases is reviewed at a minimum of once per quarter. As of June 30, 2016, the respective useful lives of each category of lease assets in the Company’s portfolio are as follows (in years):


Equipment category	Useful Life
Coal terminal		50 – 60
Transportation, rail		35 – 40
Marine vessel		20 – 30
Aviation		15 – 20
Manufacturing		10 – 15
Agriculture		7 – 10
Construction		7 – 10
Food processing		7 – 10
Materials handling		7 – 10
Transportation		7 – 10
Research		5 – 7
Computer		3 – 5

6. Related party transactions:

The terms of the Operating Agreement provide that the Managing Member and/or affiliates are entitled to receive certain fees for equipment management and resale and for management of the Company.

The Operating Agreement allows for the reimbursement of costs incurred by the Managing Member and/or affiliates for providing administrative services to the Company. Administrative services provided include Company accounting, investor relations, legal counsel and equipment financing documentation. The Managing Member is not reimbursed for services whereby it is entitled to receive a separate fee as compensation for such services, such as management of investments.

Each of AFS and ATEL Leasing Corporation (“ALC”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group and performs services for the Company on behalf of the Managing Member. Acquisition services, equipment management, lease administration and asset disposition services are performed by ALC; investor relations, communications and general administrative services are performed by AFS.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

6. Related party transactions: - (continued)

Cost reimbursements to the Managing Member or its affiliates are based on its costs incurred in performing administrative services for the Company. These costs are allocated to each managed entity based on certain criteria such as total assets, number of investors or contributed capital based upon the type of cost incurred. The Managing Member believes that the costs reimbursed are the lower of (i) actual costs incurred on behalf of the Company or (ii) the amount the Company would be required to pay independent parties for comparable administrative services in the same geographic location.

During the respective three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Managing Member and/or affiliates earned fees and billed for reimbursements of costs and expenses pursuant to the Operating Agreement as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Administrative costs reimbursed to Managing Member and/or affiliates	$	214	$	330	$	434	$	704
Asset management fees to Managing Member		101		110		221		250
Acquisition and initial direct costs paid to Managing Member		2		12		3		13
	$	317	$	452	$	658	$	967

7. Non-recourse debt:

At June 30, 2016, non-recourse debt consists of notes payable to financial institutions. The note payments are due in monthly installments. Interest on the notes range from 1.89% to 3.66% per annum. The notes are secured by assignments of lease payments and pledges of assets. At June 30, 2016, gross operating lease rentals and future payments on direct financing leases totaled approximately $11.3 million over the remaining lease terms; and the carrying value of the pledged assets is $23.9 million. The notes mature from 2016 through 2020.

The non-recourse debt does not contain any material financial covenants. The debt is secured by a lien granted by the Company to the non-recourse lenders on (and only on) the discounted lease transactions. The lenders have recourse only to the following collateral: the specific leased equipment; the related lease chattel paper; the lease receivables; and proceeds of the foregoing items. The non-recourse obligation is payable solely out of the respective specific security and the Company does not guarantee (nor is the Company otherwise contractually responsible for) the payment of the non-recourse debt as a general obligation or liability of the Company. Although the Company does not have any direct or general liability in connection with the non-recourse debt apart from the security granted, the Company is directly and generally liable and responsible for certain representations, warranties, and covenants made to the lenders, such as warranties as to genuineness of the transaction parties’ signatures, as to the genuineness of the respective lease chattel paper or the transaction as a whole, or as to the Company’s good title to or perfected interest in the secured collateral, as well as similar representations, warranties and covenants typically provided by non-recourse borrowers and customary in the equipment finance industry, and are viewed by such industry as being consistent with non-recourse discount financing obligations. Accordingly, as there are no financial covenants or ratios imposed on the Company in connection with the non-recourse debt, the Company has determined that there are no material covenants with respect to the non-recourse debt that warrant footnote disclosure.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

7. Non-recourse debt: - (continued)

Future minimum payments of non-recourse debt are as follows (in thousands):


	Principal		Interest		Total
Six months ending December 31, 2016	$	2,487	$	146	$	2,633
Year ending December 31, 2017		3,655		200		3,855
2018		3,486		94		3,580
2019		1,146		16		1,162
2020		45		—		45
	$	10,819	$	456	$	11,275

8. Long-term debt:

As of June 30, 2016, the $2.1 million of long-term debt consists of a note payable to a lender. Such debt was utilized during the fourth quarter of 2013 to partially fund the marine vessel and related bareboat charter purchased by the Fund and its affiliate, ATEL 14, LLC. The note bears interest at a fixed-rate of 3.5% per annum, to accrue in arrears on a monthly basis. The full pro rata principal amount of $2.1 million plus all outstanding accrued and unpaid interest of approximately $400 thousand shall be paid in one payment of $2.5 million due on May 25, 2019. The note is recourse to the residual value of the vessel which is expected to be well in excess of the note amount. In addition, the lender has recourse to the Fund’s general assets up to $2.5 million. The note does not contain any material financial covenants and is guaranteed as a senior obligation of the Fund.

9. Borrowing facilities:

Effective May 25, 2012, the Company participates with AFS and certain of its affiliates in a revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of financial institutions as lenders. The Credit Facility is comprised of a working capital facility to AFS, an acquisition facility (the “Acquisition Facility”) and a warehouse facility (the “Warehouse Facility”) to AFS, the Company and affiliates, and a venture facility available to an affiliate. As of June 30, 2016, the Credit Facility is for an amount up to $75.0 million and is set to expire on June 30, 2017. The lending syndicate providing the Credit Facility has a blanket lien on all of the Company’s assets as collateral for any and all borrowings under the Acquisition Facility, and on a pro-rata basis under the Warehouse Facility. Such Credit Facility includes certain financial covenants.

As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, borrowings under the Credit Facility were as follows (in thousands):


	June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Total available under the financing arrangement	$	75,000		$	75,000
Amount borrowed by the Company under the acquisition facility		—			—
Amounts borrowed by affiliated partnerships and limited liability companies under the working capital, acquisition and warehouse facilities		(13,837	)		(1,090	)
Total remaining available under the working capital, acquisition and warehouse facilities	$	61,163		$	73,910

The Company and its affiliates pay an annual commitment fee to have access to this line of credit. As of June 30, 2016, the aggregate amount of the Credit Facility is potentially available to the Company, subject to certain sub-facility and borrowing-base limitations. However, as amounts are drawn on the Credit Facility by each of the Company and the affiliates who are borrowers under the Credit Facility, the amount remaining available to all borrowers to draw under the Credit Facility is reduced. As the Warehousing Facility is a short

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

9. Borrowing facilities: - (continued)

term bridge facility, any amounts borrowed under the Warehousing Facility, and then repaid by the affiliated borrowers (including the Company) upon allocation of an acquisition to a specific purchaser, become available under the Warehouse Facility for further short term borrowing.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company’s Tangible Net Worth requirement under the Credit Facility was $10.0 million, the permitted maximum leverage ratio was not to exceed 1.25 to 1, and the required minimum interest coverage ratio was not to be less than 2 to 1. The Company was in compliance with these financial covenants under the Credit Facility with a minimum Tangible Net Worth, leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio, as calculated per the Credit Facility agreement of $30.3 million, 0.40 to 1, and 20.29 to 1, respectively, as of June 30, 2016. As such, as of June 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with all material financial covenants, and with all other material conditions of the Credit Facility. The Company does not anticipate any covenant violations nor does it anticipate that any of these covenants will restrict its operations or its ability to procure additional financing.

Fee and interest terms

The interest rate on the Credit Facility is based on either the LIBOR/Eurocurrency rate of 1-, 2-, 3- or 6-month maturity plus a lender designated spread, or the bank’s Prime rate, which re-prices daily. Principal amounts of loans made under the Credit Facility that are prepaid may be re-borrowed on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth under the Credit Facility. Since the effective date of its participation in the Credit Facility (May 25, 2012) through June 30, 2016, the Company has had no borrowings under the Credit Facility.

Warehouse facility

To hold the assets under the Warehousing Facility prior to allocation to specific investor programs, a Warehousing Trust has been entered into by the Company, AFS, ALC, and certain of the affiliated partnerships and limited liability companies. The Warehousing Trust is used by the Warehouse Facility borrowers to acquire and hold, on a short-term basis, certain lease transactions that meet the investment objectives of each of such entities. Each of the leasing programs sponsored by AFS and ALC is a pro rata participant in the Warehousing Trust, as described below. When a program no longer has a need for short term financing provided by the Warehousing Facility, it is removed from participation, and as new leasing investment entities are formed by AFS and ALC and commence their acquisition stages, these new entities are added.

As of June 30, 2016, the investment program participants were ATEL 14, LLC, the Company and ATEL 16, LLC. Pursuant to the Warehousing Trust, the benefit of the lease transaction assets, and the corresponding liabilities under the Warehouse Facility, inure to each of such entities based upon each entity’s pro-rata share in the Warehousing Trust estate. The “pro-rata share” is calculated as a ratio of the net worth of each entity over the aggregate net worth of all entities benefiting from the Warehousing Trust estate, excepting that the trustees, AFS and ALC, are both jointly and severally liable for the pro rata portion of the obligations of each of the affiliated partnerships and limited liability companies participating under the Warehouse Facility. Transactions are financed through this Warehouse Facility only until the transactions are allocated to a specific program for purchase or are otherwise disposed by AFS and ALC. When a determination is made to allocate the transaction to a specific program for purchase by the program, the purchaser repays the debt associated with the asset, either with cash or by means of proceeds of a draw under the Acquisition Facility, and the asset is removed from the Warehouse Facility collateral, and ownership of the asset and any debt obligation associated with the asset are assumed solely by the purchasing entity.

There were no borrowings under the Warehouse Facility as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

10. Commitments:

At June 30, 2016, there were commitments to fund an approximate $600 thousand of investments in notes receivable. These amounts represent contract awards which may be canceled by the prospective borrower/investee or may not be accepted by the Company.

11. Members’ Capital:

A total of 6,606,921 Units were issued and outstanding at both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, including the 50 Units issued to the initial Member (Managing Member). The Fund was authorized to issue up to 15,000,000 Units in addition to the Units issued to the initial Member.

Distributions to the Other Members for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were as follows (in thousands, except as to Units and per Unit data):


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Distributions declared	$	1,487	$	1,488	$	2,973	$	2,976
Weighted average number of Units outstanding		6,606,921		6,614,699		6,606,921		6,614,959
Weighted average distributions per Unit	$	0.23	$	0.22	$	0.45	$	0.45

12. Fair value measurements:

At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, only the Company’s warrants were measured on a recurring basis. In addition, certain notes receivable deemed impaired were measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

The measurement methodology is as follows:

Warrants (recurring)

Warrants owned by the Company are not registered for public sale, but are considered derivatives and are carried on the balance sheet at an estimated fair value at the end of the period. The valuation of the warrants was determined using a Black-Scholes formulation of value based upon the stock price(s), the exercise price(s), the volatility of comparable venture companies, and a risk free interest rate for the term(s) of the warrant exercise(s). The calculated fair value of the Fund’s warrant portfolio approximated $771 thousand and $770 thousand at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Such valuations are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

The fair value of warrants that were accounted for on a recurring basis as of the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 and classified as level 3 are as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015		2016		2015
Fair value of warrants at beginning of period	$	774		$	848	$	770	$	848
Unrealized (loss) gain on fair valuation of warrants		(3	)		50		1		50
Fair value of warrants at end of period	$	771		$	898	$	771	$	898

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

12. Fair value measurements: - (continued)

Impaired notes receivable (non-recurring)

The fair value of the Company’s notes receivable, when impairment adjustments are required, is estimated using either third party appraisals or estimations of the value of collateral (for collateral dependent loans) or discounted cash flow analyses (by discounting estimated future cash flows) using the effective interest rate contained in the terms of the original loan. During the first six months of 2015, the Company had recorded fair value adjustments totaling $27 thousand relative to two impaired notes. During the first six months of 2016, additional fair value adjustments totaling $5 thousand were recorded to further reduce the cost basis of these notes.

The fair value adjustments recorded were non-recurring and were based upon an estimated valuation of underlying collateral. Under the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the fair value of the impaired notes receivable is classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. The valuation utilizes a market approach technique and uses inputs from third party appraisers that utilize current market transactions as adjusted for certain factors specific to the underlying collateral.

The following table presents the fair value measurement of impaired assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and the level within the hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):


	June 30, 2016		Level 1 Estimated Fair Value		Level 2 Estimated Fair Value		Level 3 Estimated Fair Value
Impaired notes receivable, net	$	20	$	—	$	—	$	20


	December 31, 2015		Level 1 Estimated Fair Value		Level 2 Estimated Fair Value		Level 3 Estimated Fair Value
Impaired notes receivable, net	$	31	$	—	$	—	$	31

The following tables summarize the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used for the Company’s recurring and non-recurring fair value calculation categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

June 30, 2016

Name

Valuation
Frequency

Valuation Technique

Unobservable Inputs

Range of Input Values

Warrants

Recurring

Black-Scholes formulation

Stock price

$0.43 – $1,000.00

Exercise price

$0.43 – $1,000.00

Time to maturity (in years)

0.12 – 9.58

Risk-free interest rate

0.20% – 1.46%

Annualized volatility

100.00%

Notes Receivable

Non-recurring

Market Approach

Third Party Agents’ estimate of
the value of collateral

$5,174 – $12,065

Condition of collateral
(equipment)

Poor to Average

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

12. Fair value measurements: - (continued)

December 31, 2015

Name

Valuation
Frequency

Valuation Technique

Unobservable Inputs

Range of Input Values

Warrants

Recurring

Black-Scholes formulation

Stock price

$0.70 – $1,000.00

Exercise price

$0.70 – $1,000.00

Time to maturity (in years)

0.62 – 8.35

Risk-free interest rate

0.52% – 2.17%

Annualized volatility

100.00%

Notes Receivable

Non-recurring

Market Approach

Third Party Agents’ estimate of
the value of collateral

$5,174 – $12,065

Condition of collateral
(equipment)

Poor to Average

The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the guidance provided by the Financial Instruments Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Fair value estimates, methods and assumptions, set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments, are made solely to comply with the requirements of the Financial Instruments Topic and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and related notes.

The Company has determined the estimated fair value amounts by using market information and valuation methodologies that it considers appropriate and consistent with the fair value accounting guidance. Considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize or has realized in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Cash and cash equivalents

The recorded amounts of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value because of the liquidity and short-term maturity of these instruments.

Notes receivable

The fair value of the Company’s notes receivable is generally estimated based upon various methodologies deployed by financial and credit management including, but not limited to, credit analysis, third party appraisal and/or discounted cash flow analysis based upon current market valuation techniques and market rates for similar types of lending arrangements, which may consider adjustments for impaired loans as deemed necessary.

Investment in securities

The Company’s investment securities are not registered for public sale and are carried at cost which management believes approximates fair value, as appropriately adjusted for impairment.

Non-recourse and Long-term debt

The fair value of the Company’s non-recourse debt is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based upon current market borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Commitments and Contingencies

Management has determined that no recognition for the fair value of the Company’s loan commitments is necessary because their terms are made on a market rate basis and require borrowers to be in compliance with the Company’s credit requirements at the time of funding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

12. Fair value measurements: - (continued)

The fair value of contingent liabilities (or guarantees) is not considered material because management believes there has been no event that has occurred wherein a guarantee liability has been incurred or will likely be incurred.

The following tables present estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments in accordance with the guidance provided by the Financial Instruments Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):


	June 30, 2016
	Carrying Amount		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	4,198	$	4,198	$	—	$	—	$	4,198
Notes receivable, net		1,071		—		—		1,071		1,071
Investment in securities		317		—		—		317		317
Fair value of warrants		771		—		—		771		771
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt		10,819		—		—		10,962		10,962
Long-term debt		2,068		—		—		2,331		2,331


	December 31, 2015
	Carrying Amount		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	5,623	$	5,623	$	—	$	—	$	5,623
Notes receivable, net		1,780		—		—		1,780		1,780
Investment in securities		283		—		—		283		283
Fair value of warrants		770		—		—		770		770
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt		13,362		—		—		13,418		13,418
Long-term debt		2,068		—		—		2,248		2,248

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Statements contained in this Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (“MD&A”) and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, which are not historical facts, may be forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. In particular, economic recession and changes in general economic conditions, including fluctuations in demand for equipment, lease rates, and interest rates, may result in delays in investment and reinvestment, delays in leasing, re-leasing, and disposition of equipment, and reduced returns on invested capital. The Company’s performance is subject to risks relating to lessee and borrower defaults and the creditworthiness of its lessees and borrowers. The Company’s performance is also subject to risks relating to the value of its equipment at the end of its leases, which may be affected by the condition of the equipment, technological obsolescence and the markets for new and used equipment at the end of lease terms. Investors are cautioned not to attribute undue certainty to these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Form 10-Q or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, other than as required by law.

Overview

Results of Operations

The three months ended June 30, 2016 versus the three months ended June 30, 2015

The Company had net income of $64 thousand and net loss of $64 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The results for the second quarter of 2016 reflect decreases in both total revenues and total expenses when compared to the prior year period.

Revenues

Total revenues for the second quarter of 2016 decreased by $309 thousand, or 11%, as compared to the prior year period. Such decline was largely due to decreases in operating lease revenues, interest on notes receivable and the fair valuation of warrants.

Operating lease revenues declined by $195 thousand largely as a result of run-off and sales of lease assets since June 30, 2015. Interest on notes receivable decreased by $54 thousand primarily due to loan maturities and the early termination of certain loans. The unfavorable change in the fair value of the Fund’s portfolio of warrants of $53 thousand was attributable to the required periodic revaluation of the warrants in the Company’s portfolio of investments.

Expenses

Total expenses for the second quarter of 2016 decreased by $437 thousand, or 16%, as compared to the prior year period. The net decrease in expenses was primarily the result of reductions in depreciation expense, cost reimbursements paid to the Managing Member, interest expense.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The decline in depreciation expense totaled $226 thousand and was largely a result of run-off and sales of lease assets. The decrease in cost reimbursements paid to the Managing Member totaled $116 thousand and was a result of lower allocated costs based, in part, on the Fund’s declining asset base. Interest expense decreased by $38 thousand as a result of a $5.5 million reduction in outstanding borrowings since June 30, 2015.

The six months ended June 30, 2016 versus the six months ended June 30, 2015

The Company had net income of $77 thousand and net losses of $244 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The results for the first half of 2016 reflect decreases in both total revenues and total expenses when compared to the prior year period.

Revenues

Total revenues for the first half of 2016 decreased by $518 thousand, or 10%, as compared to the prior year period. Such decline was largely due to decreases in operating lease revenues, interest on notes receivable and the fair valuation of warrants.

Operating lease revenues declined by $301 thousand largely as a result of run-off and sales of lease assets since June 30, 2015. Interest on notes receivable decreased by $108 thousand primarily due to loan maturities and the early termination of certain loans. The unfavorable change in the fair value of the Fund’s portfolio of warrants of $49 thousand was attributable to the required periodic revaluation of the warrants in the Company’s portfolio of investments.

Expenses

Total expenses for the first half of 2016 decreased by $839 thousand, or 15%, as compared to the prior year period. The net decrease in expenses was primarily the result of reductions in depreciation expense, cost reimbursements paid to the Managing Member, interest expense.

The decline in depreciation expense totaled $402 thousand and was largely a result of run-off and sales of lease assets. The decrease in cost reimbursements paid to the Managing Member totaled $270 thousand and was a result of lower allocated costs based, in part, on the Fund’s declining asset base. Interest expense decreased by $66 thousand as a result of a $5.5 million reduction in outstanding borrowings since June 30, 2015.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents totaled $4.2 million and $5.6 million at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The liquidity of the Company will vary in the future, increasing to the extent cash flows from leases and proceeds of asset sales exceed expenses and decreasing as lease assets are acquired, as distributions are made to the Members and to the extent expenses exceed cash flows from leases and proceeds from asset sales.

The Company currently believes it has available adequate reserves to meet its immediate cash requirements and those of the next twelve months, but in the event those reserves were found to be inadequate, the Company would likely be in a position to borrow against its current portfolio to meet such requirements. The Managing Member envisions no such requirements for operating purposes.

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth summary cash flow data (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	1,526		$	1,796		$	3,541		$	3,097
Investing activities		363			(62	)		791			170
Financing activities		(2,883	)		(3,055	)		(5,757	)		(4,320	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	(994	)	$	(1,321	)	$	(1,425	)	$	(1,053	)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The three months ended June 30, 2016 versus the three months ended June 30, 2015

During the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s primary source of liquidity was cash flow from its portfolio of operating lease contracts and its investments in notes receivable. The Company also realized $35 thousand and zero proceeds from the sales of lease assets and/or the early termination of notes receivable during the respective three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.

During the same comparative periods, cash was primarily used to pay distributions and to pay down debt. Distributions paid to both Other Members and the Managing Member totaled $1.5 million for each of the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. Cash used to pay down debt totaled $1.3 million and $1.4 million for the respective three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. In addition, during the prior year period, cash was used to acquire $443 thousand of lease assets. There were no lease assets acquired during the current year period.

The six months ended June 30, 2016 versus the six months ended June 30, 2015

During the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s primary source of liquidity was cash flow from its portfolio of operating lease contracts and its investments in notes receivable. The Company also realized $121 thousand and $101 thousand of proceeds from the sales of lease assets and/or the early termination of notes receivable during the respective six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. In addition, during the prior year period, the Company utilized borrowings of $1.6 million. There were no such borrowings during the current year period.

During the same comparative periods, cash was primarily used to pay distributions and to pay down debt. Distributions paid to both Other Members and the Managing Member totaled $3.2 million for each of the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. Cash used to pay down debt totaled $2.5 million and $2.7 million for the respective six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. In addition, during the prior year period, cash was used to acquire $798 thousand of lease assets. There were no lease assets acquired during the current year period.

Revolving credit facility

Effective May 25, 2012, the Company participates with AFS and certain of its affiliates in a revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of financial institutions. The Credit Facility is comprised of a working capital facility to AFS, an acquisition facility (the “Acquisition Facility”) and a warehouse facility (the “Warehouse Facility”) to AFS, the Company and affiliates, and a venture facility available to an affiliate. As of June 30, 2016, the Credit Facility is for an amount up to $75.0 million and is set to expire on June 30, 2017. The lending syndicate providing the Credit Facility has a blanket lien on all of the Company’s assets as collateral for any and all borrowings under the Acquisition Facility, and on a pro-rata basis under the Warehouse Facility. Such Credit Facility includes certain financial covenants.

Compliance with covenants

The Credit Facility includes certain financial and non-financial covenants applicable to each borrower, including the Company. Such covenants include covenants typically found in credit facilities of the size and nature of the Credit Facility, such as accuracy of representations, good standing, absence of liens and material litigation, etc. The Company was in compliance with all applicable covenants under the Credit Facility as of June 30, 2016. The Company considers certain financial covenants to be material to its ongoing use of the Credit Facility and these covenants are described below.

Material financial covenants

Under the Credit Facility, the Company is required to maintain a specific tangible net worth, to comply with a leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio, and to comply with other terms expressed in the Credit Facility, including limitation on the incurrence of additional debt and guaranties, defaults, and delinquencies.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

As of June 30, 2016, the material financial covenants are summarized as follows:

Minimum Tangible Net Worth: $10.0 million
Leverage Ratio (leverage to Tangible Net Worth): Not to exceed 1.25 to 1
Collateral Value: Collateral value under the Warehouse Facility must be no less than the outstanding borrowings under that facility
EBITDA to Interest Ratio: Not to be less than 2 to 1 for the four fiscal quarters just ended

“EBITDA” is defined under the Credit Facility as, for the relevant period of time (1) gross revenues (all payments from leases and notes receivable) for such period minus (2) expenses deducted in determining net income for such period plus (3) to the extent deducted in determining net income for such period (a) provision for income taxes and (b) interest expense, and (c) depreciation, amortization and other non-cash charges. Extraordinary items and gains or losses on (and proceeds from) sales or dispositions of assets outside of the ordinary course of business are excluded in the calculation of EBITDA. “Tangible Net Worth” is defined as, as of the date of determination, (i) the net worth of the Company, after deducting therefrom (without duplication of deductions) the net book amount of all assets of the Company, after deducting any reserves and other amounts for assets which would be treated as intangibles under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), and after certain other adjustments permitted under the agreements.

The financial covenants referred to above are applicable to the Company only to the extent that the Company has borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility. The Company was in compliance with these financial covenants under the Credit Facility with a minimum Tangible Net Worth, leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio, as calculated per the Credit Facility agreement of $30.3 million, 0.40 to 1, and 20.29 to 1, respectively, as of June 30, 2016. As such, as of June 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with all such material financial covenants.

Reconciliation to GAAP of EBITDA

For purposes of compliance with the Credit Facility covenants, the Company uses a financial calculation of EBITDA, as defined therein, which is a non-GAAP financial performance measure. The EBITDA is utilized by the Company to calculate its debt covenant ratios.

The following is a reconciliation of net loss to EBITDA, as defined in the loan agreement, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2016 (in thousands):


Net loss – GAAP basis	$	(72	)
Interest expense		478
Depreciation and amortization		7,558
Amortization of initial direct costs		120
Provision for losses on investment in securities		21
Unrealized loss on fair valuation of warrants		127
Principal payments received on notes receivable		1,469
EBITDA (for Credit Facility financial covenant calculation only)	$	9,701

Distributions

The Unitholders of record are entitled to certain distributions as provided under the Operating Agreement. The Company commenced periodic distributions beginning with the month of January 2012. Additional distributions have been made consistently through June 2016.

Cash distributions were made by the Fund to Unitholders of record as of February 29, 2016 and paid through June 30, 2016. Distributions may be characterized for tax, accounting and economic purposes as a return of capital, a return on capital (including escrow interest) or a portion of each. Generally, the portion of each cash distribution by a company which exceeds its net income for the fiscal period would constitute a return of capital. The Fund is required by the terms of its Operating Agreement to distribute the net cash flow generated by its investments in certain minimum amounts during the Reinvestment Period before it can reinvest its operating cash flow in additional portfolio assets. See the discussion in

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the ATEL 15, LLC Prospectus dated October 28, 2011 (“Prospectus”) under “Income, Losses and Distributions — Reinvestment.” Accordingly, the amount of cash flow from Fund investments distributed to Unitholders will not be available for reinvestment in additional portfolio assets. The cash distributions were based on current and anticipated gross revenues from the leases and loans acquired. During the Fund's acquisition and operating stages, the Fund may incur short term borrowing to fund regular distributions of such gross revenues to be generated by newly acquired transactions during their respective initial fixed terms. As such, all Fund periodic cash distributions made during these stages have been, and are expected in the future to be, based on the Fund's actual and anticipated gross revenues to be generated from the binding initial terms of the leases and loans acquired.

The following table summarizes distribution activity for the Fund from inception through June 30, 2016 (in thousands, except as to Units and per Unit data):



Distribution Period⁽¹⁾	Paid		Return of Capital				Distribution of Income				Total Distribution				Total Distribution per Unit⁽²⁾		Weighted Average Units Outstanding⁽³⁾
Monthly and quarterly distributions
Oct 2011 – Dec 2011 (Distribution of escrow interest)		Feb 2012 – Jun 2012	$	—			$	—			$	—				n/a		n/a
Jan 2012 – Nov 2012		Feb 2012 – Dec 2012		1,173				—				1,173				0.79		1,476,249
Dec 2012 – Nov 2013		Jan 2013 – Dec 2013		4,191				—				4,191				0.88		4,758,784
Dec 2013 – Nov 2014		Jan 2014 – Dec 2014		5,952				—				5,952				0.90		6,620,428
Dec 2014 – Nov 2015		Jan 2015 – Dec 2015		5,951				—				5,951				0.90		6,612,560
Dec 2015 – May 2016		Jan 2016 – Jun 2016		2,973				—				2,973				0.45		6,606,921
			$	20,240			$	—			$	20,240			$	3.92
Source of distributions
Lease and loan payments and sales proceeds received			$	20,240	100.00	%	$	—	0.00	%	$	20,240	100.00	%
Interest Income				—	0.00	%		—	0.00	%		—	0.00	%
Debt against non-cancellable firm term payments on leases and loans				—	0.00	%		—	0.00	%		—	0.00	%
			$	20,240	100.00	%	$	—	0.00	%	$	20,240	100.00	%

(1)

Investors may elect to receive their distributions either monthly or quarterly (See “Timing and Method of Distributions” on Page 67 of the Prospectus).

(2)

Total distributions per Unit represents the per Unit distribution rate for those units which were outstanding for all of the applicable period.

(3)

Balances shown represent weighted average units for the period from January 1, 2012 to November 30, 2012, December 1, 2012 to November 30, 2013, December 1, 2013 to November 30, 2014, December 1, 2014 to November 30, 2015, and December 1, 2015 to May 31, 2016, respectively.

Commitments and Contingencies and Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

Commitments and Contingencies

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

None.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

For information on recent accounting pronouncements, see Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, which are based upon historical experiences, market trends and financial forecasts, and upon various other assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances and at that certain point in time. Actual results may differ, significantly at times, from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The Company’s critical accounting policies are described in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. There have been no material changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies since December 31, 2015.

Item 4. Controls and procedures.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

The Company’s Managing Member’s Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Operating Officer (“Management”), evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Operating Officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

The Company does not control the financial reporting process, and is solely dependent on the Management of the Managing Member, who is responsible for providing the Company with financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The Managing Member’s disclosure controls and procedures, as they are applicable to the Company, means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in internal control

There were no changes in the Managing Member’s internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Company, during the quarter ended June 30, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Managing Member’s internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Company.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

In the ordinary course of conducting business, there may be certain claims, suits, and complaints filed against the Managing Member. In the opinion of management, the outcome of such matters, if any, will not have a material impact on the Managing Member’s financial position or results of operations.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not Applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

(a)

Documents filed as a part of this report

Financial Statement Schedules

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable, and therefore have been omitted.

Other Exhibits


31.1		Certification of Dean L. Cash
31.2		Certification of Paritosh K. Choksi
32.1		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of Dean L. Cash
32.2		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of Paritosh K. Choksi
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: August 12, 2016

ATEL 15, LLC
(Registrant)

By:

ATEL Managing Member, LLC
Managing Member of Registrant

By:

/s/ Dean L. Cash

Dean L. Cash
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer of
ATEL Managing Member, LLC (Managing Member)

By:

/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi

Paritosh K. Choksi
Director, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of
ATEL Managing Member, LLC (Managing Member)

By:

/s/ Samuel Schussler

Samuel Schussler
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of
ATEL Managing Member, LLC (Managing Member)

ATEL 15, LLC - FORM 10-Q - August 12, 2016

Attached files

Form 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016

For the transition period from to

Commission File number 333-174418

ATEL 15, LLC

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

ATEL 15, LLC Index

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited).

ATEL 15, LLC STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 AND 2015(in thousands except units and per unit data) (Unaudited)

ATEL 15, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

1. Organization and Limited Liability Company matters:

2. Summary of significant accounting policies:

Basis of presentation:

ATEL 15, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Use of Estimates:

Segment reporting:

Accounts receivable

Financing receivables

ATEL 15, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Investment in securities:

Purchased securities

Warrants

Per Unit data:

ATEL 15, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Fair Value:

Recent accounting pronouncements:

ATEL 15, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

3. Notes receivable, net:

ATEL 15, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

3. Notes receivable, net: - (continued)

ATEL 15, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

3. Notes receivable, net: - (continued)

4. Allowance for credit losses:

ATEL 15, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

4. Allowance for credit losses: - (continued)

ATEL 15, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

4. Allowance for credit losses: - (continued)

ATEL 15, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

5. Investment in equipment and leases, net:

Impairment of investments in leases:

ATEL 15, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

5. Investment in equipment and leases, net: - (continued)

Operating leases:

Direct financing leases:

ATEL 15, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

5. Investment in equipment and leases, net: - (continued)

6. Related party transactions:

ATEL 15, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

6. Related party transactions: - (continued)

7. Non-recourse debt:

ATEL 15, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

7. Non-recourse debt: - (continued)

8. Long-term debt:

9. Borrowing facilities:

ATEL 15, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

9. Borrowing facilities: - (continued)

Fee and interest terms

Warehouse facility

ATEL 15, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

10. Commitments:

11. Members’ Capital:

12. Fair value measurements:

Warrants (recurring)

ATEL 15, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

12. Fair value measurements: - (continued)

Impaired notes receivable (non-recurring)

ATEL 15, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

12. Fair value measurements: - (continued)

Cash and cash equivalents

Notes receivable

Investment in securities

Non-recourse and Long-term debt

Commitments and Contingencies

ATEL 15, LLC

Index

ATEL 15, LLC

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 AND 2015
(in thousands except units and per unit data)
(Unaudited)

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

ATEL 15, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

ATEL 15, LLC
(Registrant)