AvailableForSaleSecuritiesGrossUnrealizeLoss

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016

or

Commission file number: 001-36182

Xencor, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(626) 305-5900

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ☒  No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes ☒  No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐   Accelerated filer ☒   Non-accelerated filer ☐   Smaller reporting company ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).  Yes ☐  No ☒

Indicate the number of shares of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

Xencor, Inc.

Quarterly Report on FORM 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016

Table of Contents

In this report, unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise indicates, references to “Xencor,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar references refer to Xencor, Inc.  The Xencor logo is a registered trademark of Xencor, Inc.  This report also contains registered marks, trademarks and trade names of other companies. All other trademarks, registered marks and trade names appearing in this report are the property of their respective holders.

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements include statements that may relate to our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, future revenues or performance, capital expenditures, financing needs and other information that is not historical information. Many of these statements appear, in particular, under the headings “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”. Forward-looking statements can often be identified by the use of terminology such as “subject to”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “plan”, “expect”, “intend”, “estimate”, “project”, “may”, “will”, “should”, “would”, “could”, “can”, the negatives thereof, variations thereon and similar expressions, or by discussions of strategy.

All forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, our examination of historical operating trends, are based upon our current expectations and various assumptions. We believe there is a reasonable basis for our expectations and beliefs, but they are inherently uncertain. We may not realize our expectations, and our beliefs may not prove correct. Actual results could differ materially from those described or implied by such forward-looking statements. The following uncertainties and factors, among others (including those set forth under “Risk Factors”), could affect future performance and cause actual results to differ materially from those matters expressed in or implied by forward-looking statements:

The factors, risks and uncertainties referred to above and others are more fully described under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December, 31, 2015. Forward-looking statements should be regarded solely as our current plans, estimates and beliefs. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. We cannot guarantee future results, events, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We do not undertake and specifically decline any obligation to update, republish or revise forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrences of unanticipated events.

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item1. Financial Statements

Xencor, Inc.

Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share amounts)

See accompanying notes.

Xencor, Inc.

Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(unaudited)

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

See accompanying notes.  

Xencor, Inc.

Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

(in thousands, except share data)

See accompanying notes.  

Xencor, Inc.

Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

(in thousands)

See accompanying notes.  

Xencor, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

(unaudited)

June 30, 2016

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements for Xencor, Inc. (the Company) have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information. The financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that the management of the Company believes are necessary for a fair presentation of the periods presented. The preparation of interim financial statements requires the use of management’s estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the interim financial statements and the reported revenues and expenditures during the reported periods. These interim financial results are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full fiscal year or for any subsequent interim period.

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 8, 2016.

Marketable Securities

The Company has an investment policy that includes guidelines on acceptable investment securities, minimum credit quality, maturity parameters and concentration and diversification. The Company invests its excess cash primarily in marketable securities issued by investment grade institutions.

The Company considers its marketable securities to be available-for-sale. These assets are carried at fair value and the unrealized gains and losses are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Accrued interest on marketable securities is included in marketable securities. If a decline in the value of a marketable security in the Company’s investment portfolio is deemed to be other-than-temporary, the Company writes down the security to its current fair value and recognizes a loss as a charge against income. The Company reviews its portfolio of marketable securities, using both quantitative and qualitative factors, to determine if declines in fair value below cost are other-than-temporary.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting,” which amends the current stock compensation guidance. The amendments simplify the accounting for the taxes related to stock based compensation, including adjustments to how excess tax benefits and a company's payments for tax withholdings should be classified. The standard is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing” which amends and clarifies the revenue recognition guidance on accounting for licenses of intellectual property (IP) and identifying performance obligations. The amendment clarifies how an entity should evaluate the nature of its promise in granting a license of IP which will determine whether it recognizes revenue over time or at a point in time and also clarifies when a promised good or service is separately identifiable, which is an important step in determining whether goods or services should be accounted for as separate performance obligations. The amendment has the same effective date as the new revenue recognition standard which is for fiscal periods after December 15, 2017.

The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of the new accounting pronouncements on its financial statements and related disclosures.

There have been no other material changes to the significant accounting policies previously disclosed in the Company’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Financial instruments included in the financial statements include cash equivalents, marketable securities, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses. Marketable securities and cash equivalents are carried at fair value. The fair value of the other financial instruments closely approximates their fair value due to their short maturities.

The Company accounts for recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820). ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value, and requires expanded disclosure about fair value measurements.  The ASC 820 hierarchy ranks the quality of reliable inputs, or assumptions, used in the determination of fair value and requires assets and liabilities carried at fair value to be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

Level 1—Fair Value is determined by using unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2—Fair Value is determined by using inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices that are directly or indirectly observable. Inputs can include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active. Related inputs can also include those used in valuation or other pricing models, such as interest rates and yield curves that can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3—Fair value is determined by inputs that are unobservable and not corroborated by market data. Use of these inputs involves significant and subjective judgments to be made by the reporting entity –e.g. determining an appropriate discount factor for illiquidity associated with a given security.

The Company measures the fair value of financial assets using the highest level of inputs that are reasonably available as of the measurement date. The assets recorded at fair value are classified within the hierarchy as follows for the periods reported (in thousands):

Our policy is to record transfers of assets between Level 1 and Level 2 at their fair values as of the end of each reporting period, consistent with the date of the determination of fair value.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2. The Company does not have any Level 3 assets or liabilities.

3. Net Income (Loss) Per Share 

We compute net income (loss) per common share by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period without consideration of common stock equivalents. Diluted income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common stock equivalents outstanding for the period. The treasury stock method is used to determine the dilutive effect of the Company’s stock option grants. Potentially dilutive securities consisting of stock issuable under options and our 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) are not included in the diluted net loss per common share calculation where the inclusion of such shares would have had an antidilutive effect.

Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share is computed as follows (in thousands except share and per share data):

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 there were no shares from the Company’s employee stock purchase plan that had a dilutive effect on shares outstanding. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, all outstanding potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per common share as the effect of including such securities would have been antidilutive.

4. Comprehensive income (loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss). For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the only component of other comprehensive income is net unrealized gains on marketable securities. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2015, the only component of other comprehensive loss is net unrealized losses on marketable securities. There were no material reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.

5. Marketable Securities

The Company’s marketable securities held as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are summarized below:

The maturities of the Company’s marketable securities are as follows:

6. Stock Based Compensation

Our Board of Directors and the requisite stockholders previously approved the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2010 Plan). In October 2013, our Board of Directors approved the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2013 Plan) and in November 2013 our stockholders approved the 2013 Plan. The 2013 Plan became effective as of December 3, 2013, the date of the Company’s initial public offering (IPO). As of December 2, 2013, we suspended the 2010 Plan and no additional awards may be granted under the 2010 Plan. Any shares of common stock covered by awards granted under the 2010 Plan that terminate after December 2, 2013 by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation or other means without the issuance of such shares will be added to the 2013 Plan reserve.

As of June 30, 2016 the total number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2013 Plan is 7,352,140, which includes 2,684,456 of common stock that were available for issuance under the 2010 Plan as of the effective date of the 2013 Plan. Unless otherwise determined by the Board, beginning January 1, 2014, and continuing until the expiration of the 2013 Plan, the total number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2013 Plan will automatically increase annually on January 1 of each year by 4% of the total number of issued and outstanding shares of common stock as of December 31 of the immediate preceding year. Pursuant to approval by our board on January 1, 2016, the total number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2013 Plan was increased by 1,400,000 shares. As of June 30, 2016 a total of 3,142,750 options had been issued under the 2013 Plan.

In November 2013, our Board of Directors and stockholders approved the 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP), which became effective as of December 5, 2013. We have reserved a total of 581,286 shares of common stock for issuance under the ESPP. Unless otherwise determined by our Board, beginning on January 1, 2014, and continuing until the expiration of the ESPP, the total number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the ESPP will automatically increase annually on January 1 by the lesser of (i) 1% of the total number of issued and outstanding shares of common stock as of December 31 of the immediately preceding year, or (ii) 621,814 shares of common stock. Pursuant to approval by our board, there was no increase in the number of authorized shares in the ESPP in 2016. As of June 30, 2016, we have issued a total of 195,129 shares of common stock under the ESPP.

Total employee, director and non-employee stock-based compensation expense recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 are as follows (in thousands):

The following table summarizes option activity under our stock plans and related information:

We calculate the intrinsic value as the difference between the exercise price of the options and the closing price of common stock of $18.99 per share as of June 30, 2016.

Weighted average fair value of options granted during the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $8.45 and $10.58 per share, respectively.  There were 909,750 options granted during the period ended June 30, 2015. We estimated the fair value of each stock option using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the date of grant of such stock option with the following weighted average assumptions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:

As of June 30, 2016, the unamortized compensation expense related to unvested stock options was $16.8 million, net of estimated forfeitures. The remaining unamortized compensation expense will be recognized over the next three years.

7. Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

The Company leases office and laboratory space in Monrovia, CA through June 2020 with an option to renew for an additional five years.

The Company also leases office space in San Diego, CA through April 2018 and includes an option to renew for a period of one year. In March 2016, the Company signed a lease for additional space contiguous with its existing office space. The combined lease expires in June 2020.

The leases are accounted for as non-cancellable operating leases and future minimum payments are as follows (in thousands):

Rent expense for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $298,000 and $272,000 respectively.

Contingencies

From time to time, the Company may be subject to various litigation and related matters arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe it is currently subject to any material matters where there is at least a reasonable possibility that a material loss may be incurred.

On March 3, 2015, a verified class action complaint, captioned DePinto v. John S. Stafford, et al., C.A. No. 10742, was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against certain of the Company’s current and former directors alleging cause of action for Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Invalidity of Director and Stockholder Consents.  In general, the complaint alleged that the plaintiff and the class he seeks to represent were shareholders of the Company during the recapitalization and certain related transactions that the Company underwent in 2013 and that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties in the course of approving that series of transactions. It also challenged as invalid certain corporate acts taken in the 2013 time period.

On June 10, 2015, the Company filed a Verified Petition for Relief under Del. C. Section 205 (the 205 Petition) related to the corporate acts challenged in the complaint. The defendants filed an answer to the class action complaint on June 22, 2015. On July 9, 2015, the Court consolidated the 205 Petition with the class action, joined the Company as a defendant and ordered it to file the claims in the 205 Petition as counter-claims in the class action, which the Company has done. 

On August 11, 2015, the Company filed a Motion for Leave to File an Amended Counter-Claim, along with the proposed Amended Counter-Claim and related documents. On October 5, the parties filed a Stipulation of Partial Settlement and related documents disclosing a settlement of the invalidity claims addressed in the complaint, the counter-claim and the proposed amended counter-claim including a request by plaintiff’s counsel for reimbursement of legal fees up to $950,000. On October 7, 2015, Xencor filed the Amended Counter-Claim and related documents. On December 14, 2015, the Court entered an Order and Partial Final Judgment approving the settlement of the invalidity claims, validating each corporate act challenged in the complaint, dismissing with prejudice Count II of the complaint (the invalidity claims) and granting plaintiff’s counsel a fee award. We have paid the plaintiff’s legal award of $950,000 net of insurance proceeds of $187,500 which has been reflected as a charge in our 2015 operations. We continue to recognize legal costs as incurred and offset any insurance proceeds when approved and issued.

Based on the nature of the remaining claim, the Company believes that it is not possible to estimate the likelihood of loss or a range of potential loss related to the claim; accordingly, no amount for any loss has been accrued at June 30, 2016.

8. Collaboration and Licensing Agreements

Following is a summary description of the arrangements that generated revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.

Novartis

In June 2016, the Company entered into a Collaboration and License Agreement (the Agreement) with Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Inc., or Novartis, to develop and commercialize bispecific and other Fc modulated antibody drug candidates using the Company’s proprietary XmAb® technologies and drug candidates. Pursuant to the Agreement:

The Company received a non-refundable upfront payment under the Agreement of $150 million in July 2016 and is eligible to receive up to $2.4 billion in future development, regulatory and sales milestones in total for all programs that could be developed under the Agreement.

Under the Agreement, the Company granted Novartis a worldwide co-exclusive license with Xencor to research, develop and manufacture XmAb14045 and XmAb13676. The Company also granted Novartis an exclusive license to commercialize XmAb14045 and XmAb13676 in all worldwide territories outside the United States (U.S.). XmAb14045 is a clinical candidate that binds the CD123 antigen and the cytotoxic T-cell binding domain CD3 (the XmAb14045 Program) and targets acute myeloid leukemia (AML). XmAb13676 is a clinical candidate that binds the CD20 antigen and the cytotoxic T-cell binding domain CD3 (the XmAb13676 Program) and targets B-cell malignancies. Assuming successful development and commercialization of a product, the Company could receive up to $325 million in milestone payments for each of XmAb14045 and XmAb13676. The total potential milestones for each product include $90 million in development milestones, $110 million in regulatory milestones and, $125 million in sales milestones. If commercialized, the Company is eligible to receive tiered low double-digit royalties on global net sales of approved products outside the US.

The Company and Novartis will co-develop XmAb14045 and XmAb13676 worldwide and share development costs equally. The Company may elect to opt-out of the development of either program by providing notice to Novartis.  If the Company elects to opt-out with respect to a program, Novartis will receive the Company’s U.S. rights to the program and the Company will receive low double-digit royalties on U.S. net sales in addition to the royalties on net sales outside the US.

Pursuant to the Novartis Agreement, the Company will apply its bispecific technology to up to four target pair antibodies selected, available for exclusive license to Novartis and not subject to a Xencor internal program. The Company will apply its bispecific technology to generate bispecific antibody candidates from starting target pair antibodies provided by Novartis for each of the four Global Discovery Programs and return the bispecific product candidate to Novartis for further testing, development and commercialization. Novartis has the right to substitute up to four of the original selected target pair antibodies during the research term provided that Novartis has not filed and received acceptance for an Investigational New Drug Application (IND) with the Xencor provided bispecific candidate. The research term is five years from the date of the Agreement.

Novartis will assume full responsibility for development and commercialization of each product candidate under each of the Global Discovery Programs. Assuming successful development and commercialization of each Global Discovery Program compound, the Company could receive up to $250.0 million in milestones for each Global Discovery Program which includes $50.0 million in development milestones, $100.0 million in regulatory milestones and $100.0 million in sales milestones. If commercialized, the Company is eligible to receive mid-single digit royalties on global net sales of approved products.

Under the Novartis Agreement, the Company has the right to participate in the development and commercialization of one of the Global Discovery Programs prior to filing an IND for Global Discovery Program. If the Company elects to participate in development, it will assume responsibility for 25% of the worldwide development costs for the program and 50% of commercialization costs and will receive 50% of the US profits on net sales of the product.

Under the Novartis Agreement, the Company is also granting Novartis a non-exclusive research license to use certain of the Company’s Fc technologies, specifically Cytotoxic, Xtend and Immune Inhibitor to research, develop, commercialize and manufacture antibodies against up to ten targets selected by Novartis, available for non-exclusive license and not subject to a Xencor internal program. Novartis will assume all research, development and commercialization costs for products that are developed from application of the Fc technologies. Assuming successful development and commercialization of a compound that incorporates an Fc technology, the Company could receive up to $75.0 million in milestones for each target which includes $15.0 million in development milestones, $30.0 million in regulatory milestones and $30 million in sales milestones. If commercialized, the Company is eligible to receive low single-digit royalties on global net sales of approved products.

The Company evaluated the Agreement and determined that it is a revenue arrangement with multiple deliverables or performance obligations. The Company’s substantive performance obligations under the Agreement include:

The Company determined that the $150 million upfront payment represents the total initial consideration and was allocated to each of the deliverables using the relative selling price method. The Company determined that each of the development and regulatory milestones is substantive. Although sales milestones are not considered substantive, they are still recognized upon achievement of a milestone. After identifying each of the deliverables included in the arrangement, the Company determined the relative selling price using its best estimate of selling price for each of the deliverables.

The estimated selling price for the licensing rights to the XmAb13676 Program are the Company’s best estimate of selling price and was determined based on market conditions, similar arrangements entered into by third parties including the Company’s understanding of pricing terms offered for comparable transactions that involve licensing bispecific antibody development candidates. The Company reviewed recent published market transactions that are comparable to the license of the XmAb13676 Program in the Novartis Agreement. The Company adjusted the value of the published market information to reflect differences in stage of development and rights and potential markets to determine the estimated selling price for the license rights to the XmAb13676 program. This amount represents the value that a third party would be willing to pay for certain rights to the XmAb13676 Program including the exclusive right to commercialize XmAb13676 in all territories outside the U.S.

The Company determined the estimated selling price for the rights to the XmAb14045 Program using the income approach by calculating a risk-adjusted present value of the potential revenue that could be earned from the license reduced by the minimum development costs that the Company is obligated to fund under the Agreement. This amount represents the value that a third party would be willing to pay for certain rights to the XmAb14045 Program including the right to commercialize XmAb14045 in all territories outside the U.S.

The Company’s estimated selling price for each Global Discovery Program is the Company’s best estimate. The best estimate for each Global Discovery Programs was determined using the income approach by calculating a risk-adjusted net present value of the potential revenue that could be earned from each Global Program license reduced by the estimated cost of the Company’s efforts to deliver the completed Global Program bispecific candidate to Novartis. These amounts represent the value that a third party would be willing to pay as an upfront for access to the Company’s bispecific technology and capabilities.

The Company’s estimated selling price for the Fc licenses is its best estimate and was determined by considering market and entity-specific factors. The Company has previously licensed its Fc technologies on a limited basis to third parties.  The Company considered the term of the Novartis license, scope of the rights granted for each license, the type of technologies subject to the license, and the potential number of targets that may be applied in establishing its best estimate for the Fc license.

The total allocable consideration of $150 million was allocated to the deliverables based on the relative selling price method as follows:

The Company recognized as license revenue the amount of the total allocable consideration allocated to the XmAb13676 and XmAb14045 Programs upon delivery of the exclusive license to Novartis both of which were transferred as of the effective date of the Agreement. At the time that each Global Discovery Program is accepted by Novartis, the Company will recognize as collaboration revenue of $20.05 million for each program. Since Novartis has substitution rights for up to four target pair antibodies, revenue recognition may be delayed until the earlier that Novartis has an open IND for a delivered bispecific Discovery Program or the right to substitute the target pair lapses. The Company will recognize as licensing revenue the amount of the total consideration allocated to the Fc license over the five year research term beginning from the effective date of the Agreement.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, we recognized $58.6 million of revenue under this arrangement. As of June 30, 2016 there is $91.4 million in deferred revenue related to the arrangement.

Amgen, Inc.

In September 2015, the Company entered into a research and license agreement (the Amgen Agreement) with Amgen, Inc. (Amgen) to develop and commercialize bispecific antibody product candidates using the Company’s proprietary XmAb® bispecific Fc technology. Under the Amgen Agreement, the Company granted an exclusive license to Amgen to develop and commercialize bispecific drug candidates from the Company’s preclinical program that bind the CD38 antigen and the cytotoxic T-cell binding domain CD3, (the CD38 Program). The Company will also apply its bispecific technology to five previously identified Amgen provided targets (each a Discovery Program). The Company received a $45.0 million upfront payment from Amgen and is eligible to receive up to $1.7 billion in future development, regulatory and sales milestones in total for all six programs and is eligible to receive royalties on any global net sales of products.

In the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2015, the Company transferred the research material and data related to its CD38 Program to Amgen. Amgen will assume full responsibility for the further development and commercialization of product candidates under the CD38 Program. Assuming successful development and commercialization of a product, the Company could receive up to $355 million in milestones payments which include $55 million in development milestones, $70 million in regulatory milestones and, $230 million in sales milestones. If commercialized, the Company is eligible to receive from high single-digit up to low double-digit royalties on global net sales of approved products under the CD38 Program.

Pursuant to the Amgen Agreement, for each of the five Discovery Programs the Company will apply its bispecific technology to antibody molecules provided by Amgen that bind Discovery Program Targets and return the

bispecific product candidates to Amgen for further testing, development and commercialization. Subject to approval by Xencor, Amgen has the right to substitute up to three of the previously identified targets during the research term provided that Amgen has not initiated non-human primate studies with the Xencor provided bispecific candidate. The initial research term is three years from the date of the Amgen Agreement but Amgen, at its option, may request an extension of one year if Xencor has not completed delivery of all five Discovery Program bispecific candidates to Amgen.

Amgen will assume full responsibility for development and commercialization of product candidates under each of the Discovery Programs. Assuming successful development and commercialization of each Discovery Program compound, the Company could receive up to $260.5 million in milestones for each compound which include $35.5 million in development milestones, $55.0 million in regulatory milestones and $170.0 million in sales milestones. If commercialized, the Company is eligible to receive mid to high single-digit royalties on global net sales of approved products.

The Company evaluated the Amgen Agreement and determined that it is a revenue arrangement with multiple deliverables or performance obligations. The Company’s substantive performance obligations under the Amgen Agreement include delivery of research material and data related to its CD38 Program and application of its bispecific technology to five Amgen provided targets and delivery of the five bispecific product candidates. The Company evaluated the Amgen Agreement and determined that the CD38 Program and each of the five Discovery Programs represent separate units of accounting.

The $45 million upfront payment represents the total initial consideration and was allocated to each of the deliverables using the relative selling price method. After identifying each of the deliverables included in the arrangement, the Company determined its best estimate of selling price for each of the deliverables. In order to determine the best estimate of selling price for the CD38 Program, the Company determined the value of the CD38 Program by calculating a risk-adjusted present value of the potential revenue from the future development and regulatory milestones under the Amgen Agreement. This amount represents the value that a third party would be willing to pay as an upfront fee to license the Company’s CD38 Program.

The Company determined the value of each of the Discovery Programs by calculating a risk-adjusted net present value of the potential revenue from future development and regulatory milestones reduced by the estimated cost of the Company’s efforts to apply its bispecific technology to the Amgen targets and deliver the five bispecific product candidates. These amounts represent the value that a third party would be willing to pay as an upfront for access to the Company’s bispecific technology and capabilities.

The total allocable consideration of $45 million was allocated to the deliverables based on the relative selling price method as follows:

$13.75 million to the CD38 Program and,

$6.25 million to each of the five Discovery Programs

The Company recognized as collaboration revenue the amount of consideration allocated to the CD38 Programs upon delivery of the CD38 research material and data to Amgen in the fourth quarter of 2015.

In the first quarter ended March 31, 2016, Amgen exercised its substitution rights with respect to one of the previously identified Discovery targets. In the first quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Company delivered bispecific product candidates for three Discovery Program targets to Amgen. In the second quarter ended June 30, 2016 the Company delivered an additional product candidate for a Discovery target. As of June 30, 2016, the Company has delivered four of the discovery programs with Amgen exercising its substitution rights to one.

At the time that each bispecific Discovery Program is accepted by Amgen, the Company will recognize as collaboration revenue $6.25 million for each program. Since Amgen has substitution rights for up to three targets, revenue recognition may be delayed until the earlier that Amgen initiates non-human primate studies for a delivered bispecific Discovery Program or the right to substitute the target lapses.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, we recognized $6.2 million and $12.5 million in revenue under this arrangement, respectively. As of June 30, 2016 there is $18.7 million in deferred revenue related to the arrangement.

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation

In July 2013, we entered into a License Agreement with Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp (Merck). Under the terms of the agreement, we provided Merck with a non-exclusive commercial license to certain patent rights to our Fc domains to apply to one of their compounds. We also provided Merck with contingent options to take additional non-exclusive commercial licenses. The contingent options provide Merck an opportunity to take non-exclusive commercial licenses at an amount less than the amount paid for the original license. The agreement provided for an upfront payment of $1.0 million and annual maintenance fees totaling $0.5 million. We are also eligible to receive future milestones and royalties as Merck advances the compound into clinical development.

We determined that the deliverables under this agreement were the non-exclusive commercial license and the options. The options are considered substantive and contingent and no amount of the upfront payment was allocated to these options. We also determined that the future milestones and related payments were substantive and contingent and did not allocate any of the upfront payment to the milestones.

During each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 we recognized $25,000 and $50,000 of revenue respectively. As of June 30, 2016, there is $100,000 of deferred revenue related to this arrangement.

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

In January 2013, we entered into an option and license agreement with Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Alexion). Under the terms of the agreement, we granted to Alexion an exclusive research license, with limited sublicensing rights, to make and use our Xtend technology to evaluate and advance compounds against six different target programs during a five-year research term under the agreement, up to completion of the first multi-dose human clinical trial for each target compound.  Alexion may extend the research term for an additional three years upon written notice to us and payment of an extension fee of $2.0 million. Alexion is responsible for conducting all research and development activities under the agreement at its own expense.

In addition, we granted to Alexion an exclusive option, on a target-by-target basis, to obtain an exclusive commercial, worldwide, royalty-bearing license, with sublicensing rights, under our Xtend technology to develop and commercialize products that contain the target for which the option is exercised. In order to exercise this option, Alexion must pay a $4.0 million option fee with respect to each target for which the option is exercised. Alexion may exercise this option at any time during the research term. An option must be exercised for any compound that is advanced into development after the first multi-ascending dose trial is initiated.

Under the agreement, we received an upfront payment of $3.0 million. Alexion is also required to pay an annual maintenance fee of $0.5 million during the research term of the agreement and $1.0 million during any extension of the research term. We determined that $2.5 million of the upfront fee was allocated to the license and is being recognized into income over the initial research term of five years. 

In the third quarter of 2014, Alexion achieved a clinical development milestone with an undisclosed molecule to be used against an undisclosed target. We received a milestone related to this trial in March 2015 upon issuance of certain patents related to our Xtend technology. In the fourth quarter of 2015, Alexion exercised its option to take an exclusive commercial license and achieved a further clinical development milestone. As a result of Alexion’s exercise to take a commercial option to an undisclosed compound, the Company is eligible to receive additional development, regulatory and sales milestones under the agreement. If commercialized, the Company is eligible to receive royalties on global net sales of approved products.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 we recognized $250,000 and $500,000 of revenue respectively. As of June 30, 2016, we have deferred revenue related to this arrangement of $1.0 million.

Novo Nordisk A/S

In December 2014, we entered into a collaboration and license agreement with Novo Nordisk A/S (Novo). Under the terms of the agreement we granted Novo a research license to use certain Xencor technologies including our bispecific, Fcy-IIb, Xtend and other technologies during a two-year research term.

We are recognizing the $2.5 million upfront payment as income over the two-year research term. The research funding is being recognized into income over the period that the services are being provided. We determined that future milestone payments were substantive and contingent and we did not allocate any of the upfront consideration to these milestones.

During each of the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, we recognized $0.7 million of revenue. During each of the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, we recognized $1.4 million of revenue. As of June 30, 2016, we have $1.0 million in deferred revenue related to this arrangement.

9. Income taxes

The provision for income taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 represents the interim period tax allocation of the federal and state alternative minimum tax  based on the Company’s projected year end effective income tax rates which cannot be offset by the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards. 

The Company has deferred tax assets consisting primarily of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards that have been fully offset by a valuation allowance.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and accompanying notes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the financial statements and accompanying notes thereto for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and the related Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, both of which are contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Such forward-looking statements, which represent our intent, belief, or current expectations, involve risks and uncertainties. We use words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “predict,” “potential,” “believe,” “should” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Such statements may include, but are not limited to, statements concerning: (i) the initiation, cost, timing, progress and results of our research and development activities, preclinical studies and future clinical trials, including our expected timeline for nominating clinical development candidates under our strategic alliances and our expected timeline for filing applications with regulatory authorities;(ii) our ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approval of our future product candidates, and any related restrictions, limitations, and/or warnings in the label of an approved product candidate; (iii) our ability to obtain funding for our operations; (iv) our plans to research, develop and commercialize our future product candidates; (v) our ability to attract collaborators with development, regulatory and commercialization expertise; (vi) our ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection for our technology; (vii) the size and growth potential of the markets for our technology and future product candidates, and our ability to serve those markets; (viii) our ability to successfully commercialize our technology and our future product candidates; (ix) our ability to develop sales and marketing capabilities, whether alone or with potential future collaborators; (x) regulatory developments in the United States and foreign countries; and (xi) the performance of our collaboration partners, licensees, third-party suppliers and manufacturers.  Although we believe the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, such statements are inherently subject to risk and we can give no assurances that our expectations will prove to be correct. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. As a result of many factors, including without limitation those set forth under “Risk Factors” under Item 1A of Part II below, and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. We

undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect actual outcomes.

Company Overview

We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering and developing engineered monoclonal antibodies to treat severe and life-threatening diseases with unmet medical needs. We use our proprietary XmAb technology platform to create next-generation antibody product candidates designed to treat autoimmune and allergic diseases, cancer and other conditions. In contrast to conventional approaches to antibody design, which focus on the portion of antibodies that interact with target antigens, we focus on the portion of the antibody that interacts with multiple segments of the immune system. This portion, referred to as the Fc domain, is constant and interchangeable among antibodies. Our engineered Fc domains, the XmAb technology, can be readily substituted for natural Fc domains.

Our business strategy is based on the plug‑and‑play nature of the XmAb technology, allowing us to create new antibody drug candidates for our internal development or licensing, or to selectively license access to one or more of our XmAb technologies or product candidates to pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies to use in developing their own proprietary antibodies and drug candidates with improved properties.  These licensing transactions provide us with multiple revenue streams that help fund development of our wholly owned product candidates and usually require limited resources or efforts from us.  There are currently nine antibody product candidates in clinical trials that have been engineered with XmAb technology, including seven candidates being advanced by licensees and development partners.

Our protein engineering capabilities allow us to continue to expand the functionality of the XmAb technology platform to identify new protein enhancements and create new antibody drug candidates with improved properties. Our bispecific technology, heterodimer Fc domains, enables the creation of bispecific drug candidates, which are antibodies that are engineered to bind two targets simultaneously. The core of our bispecific programs is a novel Fc domain that is a robust and portable scaffold for two, or potentially more, different antigen binding domains.  Our Fc domain technology is designed to maintain full-length antibody properties in a bispecific antibody, potentially enabling stable molecules with favorable in vivo half-life and allowing for the use of standard antibody production methods.  The portability of the bispecific technology, including the ability of bispecific candidates generated from our technology to use standard production methods, allows us to license access to our technology as highlighted in our two bispecific licensing transactions that we entered into in the last year.

In June 2016 we entered into the Novartis Agreement which included a $150 million upfront payment and up to $2.4 billion in potential development, regulatory and sales milestones. As part of the Agreement, we will apply our bispecific technology to up to four target pair antibodies selected, available for exclusive license to Novartis and not subject to a Xencor internal program.

We will apply our bispecific technology to generate bispecific antibody candidates from starting target pair antibodies provided by Novartis for each of the four Global Discovery Programs and return the bispecific product candidate to Novartis for further testing, development and commercialization.  Assuming successful development and commercialization of each bispecific compound, we could receive up to $250 million in milestones for each compound which includes $50 million in development milestones, $100 million in regulatory milestones and $100 million in sales milestones. If commercialized, the Company is eligible to receive mid-single digit royalties on global net sales of approved products.

In September 2015 we entered into the Amgen Agreement which included a $45 million upfront payment and up to $1.7 billion in future development, regulatory and sales milestones if all programs under the agreement advance into development. In connection with the Amgen Agreement, we are applying our bispecific technology to up to five previously identified molecules identified by Amgen and approved by us. We are applying our bispecific technology to each of the five identified programs and returning the bispecific product candidates to Amgen, who is assuming full responsibility for further testing, development and commercialization. Assuming successful development and commercialization of each bispecific compound, we could receive up to $260.5 million in milestones which include $35.5 million in development milestones, $55 million in regulatory milestones and $170 million in sales milestones. If commercialized, we are eligible to receive mid to high-single digit royalties on global net sales of approved products. Through June 30, 2016 we have delivered four bispecific product candidates to Amgen under the Agreement. 

Since we commenced active operations in 1998, we have devoted substantially all of our resources to staffing our company, business planning, raising capital, developing our technology platforms, identifying potential product candidates, undertaking pre-clinical and IND enabling studies and conducting clinical trials. We have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenues from product sales, and we continue to incur significant research and development expenses and other expenses related to our ongoing operations. To date, we have funded our operations primarily through the sale of stock and convertible promissory notes and through payments generated from our product development partnership and licensing arrangements. We raised $80.5 million ($72.5 million net of expenses) in December 2013 through the sale of common stock in connection with our Initial Public Offering (IPO) and full exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment.  We raised an additional $122.9 million ($115.2 million net of expenses) through a follow-on public offering of our common stock and full exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment in March 2015. In September 2015 we received a $45 million upfront payment from Amgen in connection with the 2015Amgen Agreement. In July 2016 we received a $150 million upfront payment from Novartis in connection with the Novartis Agreement. Although it is difficult to predict our funding requirements, based upon our current operating plan, we anticipate that our cash and cash equivalents and related marketable securities as of June 30, 2016 in addition to the $150 million received from Novartis in July 2016, will enable us to fund operations at least through the end of 2019.

As of June 30, 2016, we had an accumulated deficit of $221 million. Substantially all of our operating losses that we have incurred resulted from expenses incurred in connection with our product candidate development programs, our research activities and general and administrative costs associated with our operations.