Attached files

file filename
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - KBR, INC.kbr-ex322x20160630.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - KBR, INC.kbr-ex321x20160630.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - KBR, INC.kbr-ex312x20160630.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - KBR, INC.kbr-ex311x20160630.htm


 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 
FORM 10-Q
ý
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016
OR
¨
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from             to
Commission File Number: 1-33146
 
 
 
KBR, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
 
20-4536774
(State of incorporation)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
 
 
601 Jefferson Street, Suite 3400, Houston, Texas
 
77002
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)

(713) 753-3011
(Registrant's telephone number including area code)

 

 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes  ý    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     Yes  ý    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
 
ý
Accelerated filer
 
¨
Non-accelerated filer
 
¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
 
¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes  ¨    No  ý

As of July 12, 2016, there were 142,475,499 shares of KBR, Inc. Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding.

 




.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 



2



Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain statements that are, or may be deemed to be, "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides safe harbor provisions for forward-looking information. Some of the statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. The words "believe," "may," "estimate," "continue," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "expect" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include information concerning our possible or assumed future financial performance and results of operations.

We have based these statements on our assumptions and analyses in light of our experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors we believe are appropriate in the circumstances. Forward-looking statements by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect expected results, and actual future results could differ materially from those described in such statements. While it is not possible to identify all factors, factors that could cause actual future results to differ materially, include the risks and uncertainties disclosed in our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K contained in Part I under "Risk Factors" and in this Form 10-Q in Part II under "Risk Factors."

Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or predict. Any of these factors, or a combination of these factors, could materially and adversely affect our future financial condition or results of operations and the ultimate accuracy of the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of our future performance, and our actual results and future developments may differ materially and adversely from those projected in the forward-looking statements. We caution against putting undue reliance on forward-looking statements or projecting any future results based on such statements or on present or prior earnings levels. In addition, each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement.


3



PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Information

KBR, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In millions, except for per share data)
(Unaudited)
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Revenues
$
1,009

 
$
1,381

 
$
2,005

 
$
2,817

Cost of revenues
(935
)
 
(1,307
)
 
(1,863
)
 
(2,673
)
Gross profit
74

 
74

 
142

 
144

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
33

 
53

 
62

 
88

General and administrative expenses
(34
)
 
(42
)
 
(68
)
 
(81
)
Asset impairment and restructuring charges
(12
)
 
(17
)
 
(14
)
 
(19
)
Gain on disposition of assets
2

 
28

 
6

 
28

Operating income
63

 
96

 
128

 
160

Other non-operating income (expense)
7

 
(5
)
 
2

 
1

Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interests
70

 
91

 
130

 
161

Provision for income taxes
(23
)
 
(23
)
 
(38
)
 
(42
)
Net income
47

 
68

 
92

 
119

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 
(6
)
 
(3
)
 
(13
)
Net income attributable to KBR
$
47

 
$
62

 
$
89

 
$
106

Net income attributable to KBR per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
0.32

 
$
0.43

 
$
0.62

 
$
0.73

Diluted
$
0.32

 
$
0.43

 
$
0.62

 
$
0.73

Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
142

 
144

 
142

 
144

Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
142

 
144

 
142

 
144

Cash dividends declared per share
$
0.08

 
$
0.08

 
$
0.16

 
$
0.16

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4



KBR, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(In millions)
(Unaudited)

 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Net income
$
47

 
$
68

 
$
92

 
$
119

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
(5
)
 
(3
)
 
11

 
(61
)
Reclassification adjustment included in net income

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes of $(3), $1, $(1) and $1
(5
)
 
(3
)
 
11

 
(61
)
Pension and post-retirement benefits, net of tax:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Actuarial losses, net of tax

 

 

 

Reclassification adjustment included in net income
6

 
10

 
12

 
22

Pension and post-retirement benefits, net of taxes of $(1), $(2), $(3) and $(4)
6

 
10

 
12

 
22

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
1

 
7

 
23

 
(39
)
Comprehensive income
48

 
75

 
115

 
80

Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
(1
)
 
(7
)
 
(3
)
 
(14
)
Comprehensive income attributable to KBR
$
47

 
$
68

 
$
112

 
$
66

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.


5



KBR, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In millions, except share data)
 
June 30,
 
December 31,
 
2016
 
2015
 
(Unaudited)
 
 
Assets
 
 
 
Current assets:
 
 
 
Cash and equivalents
$
804

 
$
883

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $14 and $17
618

 
628

Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts ("CIE")
252

 
224

Other current assets
127

 
109

Total current assets
1,801

 
1,844

Claims and accounts receivable
532

 
526

Property, plant, and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $353 and $352 (including net PPE of $41 and $48 owned by a variable interest entity)
153

 
169

Goodwill
345

 
324

Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $92 and $91
50

 
35

Equity in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates
316

 
281

Deferred income taxes
95

 
99

Other assets
140

 
134

Total assets
$
3,432

 
$
3,412

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
 
 
 
Current liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts payable
$
479

 
$
438

Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts ("BIE")
508

 
509

Accrued salaries, wages and benefits
161

 
173

Nonrecourse project debt
9

 
10

Other current liabilities
217

 
263

Total current liabilities
1,374

 
1,393

Pension obligations
274

 
333

Employee compensation and benefits
99

 
105

Income tax payable
90

 
78

Deferred income taxes
117

 
94

Nonrecourse project debt
41

 
51

Deferred income from unconsolidated affiliates
92

 
100

Other liabilities
200

 
206

Total liabilities
2,287

 
2,360

KBR shareholders’ equity:
 
 
 
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding

 

Common stock, $0.001 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized, 175,565,140 and 175,108,100 shares issued, and 142,474,780 and 142,058,356 shares outstanding

 

Paid-in capital in excess of par ("PIC")
2,080

 
2,070

Accumulated other comprehensive loss ("AOCL")
(808
)
 
(831
)
Retained earnings
661

 
595

Treasury stock, 33,090,360 and 33,049,744 shares, at cost
(769
)
 
(769
)
Total KBR shareholders’ equity
1,164

 
1,065

Noncontrolling interests ("NCI")
(19
)
 
(13
)
Total shareholders’ equity
1,145

 
1,052

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
$
3,432

 
$
3,412

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6



KBR, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
Cash flows used in operating activities:
 
 
 
Net income
$
92

 
$
119

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
19

 
19

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
(62
)
 
(88
)
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
7

 
(3
)
Gain on disposition of assets
(6
)
 
(28
)
Other
6

 
10

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
25

 
(49
)
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts
(28
)
 
138

Accounts payable
32

 
(135
)
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
(2
)
 
(43
)
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits
(11
)
 
4

Reserve for loss on uncompleted contracts
(23
)
 
(82
)
(Advances to) payments from unconsolidated affiliates, net
(8
)
 
4

Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
28

 
72

Income taxes payable
(10
)
 
(15
)
Pension funding
(21
)
 
(21
)
Net settlement of derivative contracts
(3
)
 
(39
)
Other assets and liabilities
(47
)
 
(2
)
Total cash flows used in operating activities
(12
)
 
(139
)
Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities:
 
 
 
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
(6
)
 
(4
)
Proceeds from sale of assets or investments
1

 
23

Acquisition of technology businesses, net of cash acquired
(22
)
 

Total cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities
$
(27
)
 
$
19


7



KBR, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
Cash flows used in financing activities:
 
 
 
Payments to reacquire common stock
$
(2
)
 
$
(17
)
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest

 
(40
)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
(9
)
 
(12
)
Payments of dividends to shareholders
(23
)
 
(23
)
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock

 
1

Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation
1

 

Payments on short-term and long-term borrowings
(5
)
 
(7
)
Total cash flows used in financing activities
(38
)
 
(98
)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
(2
)
 
(21
)
Decrease in cash and equivalents
(79
)
 
(239
)
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period
883

 
970

Cash and equivalents at end of period
$
804

 
$
731

Supplemental disclosure of cash flows information:
 
 
 
Cash paid for interest
$
4

 
$
5

Cash paid for income taxes (net of refunds)
$
31

 
$
63

Noncash financing activities
 
 
 
Dividends declared
$
12

 
$
12

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

8



KBR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Note 1. Description of Company and Significant Accounting Policies

KBR, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was formed on March 21, 2006 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas. KBR, Inc. and its wholly owned and majority-owned subsidiaries (collectively referred to herein as "KBR", "the Company", "we", "us" or "our") is an engineering, procurement, construction and services company supporting the global hydrocarbons and international government services market segments. Our capabilities include engineering, procurement, construction, construction management, technology licensing, operations, maintenance and other support services to a diverse customer base, including international and national oil and gas companies, independent refiners, petrochemical producers, fertilizer producers, manufacturers and domestic and foreign governments.
  
Principles of Consolidation

Our condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("U.S. GAAP") and include the accounts of KBR and our wholly owned and majority-owned, controlled subsidiaries and variable interest entities ("VIEs") of which we are the primary beneficiary. We account for investments over which we have significant influence but not a controlling financial interest using the equity method of accounting. See Note 8 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion on our equity investments and VIEs. The cost method is used when we do not have the ability to exert significant influence. All material intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation on the condensed consolidated statements of operations, condensed consolidated balance sheets and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

We have evaluated all events and transactions occurring after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements were issued and have included the appropriate disclosures.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Areas requiring significant estimates and assumptions by our management include the following:

project revenues, costs and profits on engineering and construction contracts and government services contracts, including recognition of estimated losses on uncompleted contracts
provisions for uncollectible receivables and client claims and recoveries of costs from subcontractors, vendors and others
provisions for income taxes and related valuation allowances and tax uncertainties
recoverability of goodwill
recoverability of other intangibles and long-lived assets and related estimated lives
recoverability of equity method and cost method investments
valuation of pension obligations and pension assets
accruals for estimated liabilities, including litigation accruals
consolidation of VIEs
valuation of share-based compensation
valuation of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations

In accordance with normal practice in the construction industry, we include in current assets and current liabilities amounts related to construction contracts realizable and payable over a period in excess of one year. If the underlying estimates and assumptions upon which the financial statements are based change in the future, actual amounts may differ from those included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.


9



Adoption of New Accounting Standards

Consolidation. Effective January 1, 2016, we adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810) - Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis, which was issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") on February 18, 2015. This ASU amends the consolidation guidance for VIEs as well as general partners’ investments in limited partnerships and modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are VIEs or voting interest entities. ASU 2015-02 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those annual periods. The adoption of ASU 2015-02 did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

Additional Balance Sheet Information

Other Current Assets

Included in the "other current assets" balance on our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are prepaid taxes and other prepaid assets of $57 million and $58 million, respectively.

Other Current Liabilities

The components of "other current liabilities" on our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are presented below:
 
June 30,
 
December 31,
Dollars in millions
2016
 
2015
Reserve for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts (a)
$
37

 
$
60

Retainage payable
46

 
49

Income taxes payable
36

 
56

Value-added tax payable
15

 
12

Insurance payable
9

 
12

Dividend payable
12

 
12

Other miscellaneous liabilities (b)
62

 
62

Total other current liabilities
$
217

 
$
263

 
(a)
See Note 2 for further discussion on our reserve for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts.
(b)
Included in "other miscellaneous liabilities" is deferred rent of $6 million and $7 million as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Other Liabilities

Included in "other liabilities" on our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 is noncurrent deferred rent of $109 million and $114 million, respectively. Also included in "other liabilities" is a payable to our former parent of $19 million in each of the periods presented. This amount will be paid to our former parent upon receipt of a tax refund from the United States ("U.S.") Internal Revenue Service in an amount greater than or equal to $19 million.



10



Note 2. Business Segment Information

We are organized into three core business segments and two non-core business segments. Our three core business segments focus on our core strengths in technology and consulting, engineering and construction, and government services. Our two non-core business segments are our Non-strategic Business segment, which includes businesses we intend to exit upon completion of existing contracts because they are no longer a part of our future strategic focus, and "Other", which includes our corporate expenses and general and administrative expenses not allocated to the other business segments. Each business segment excluding Other reflects a reportable segment led by a separate business segment president who reports directly to our chief operating decision maker ("CODM").  Business segment performance is evaluated by our CODM using gross profit (loss) and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, which is defined as business segment revenues less the cost of revenues, and includes overhead directly attributable to the business segment.

Our business segments are described below.

Technology & Consulting ("T&C"). Our T&C business segment combines proprietary KBR technologies, knowledge-based services and our three specialist consulting brands, Granherne, Energo and GVA, under a single customer-facing global business.  This business segment provides licensed technologies and consulting services throughout the oil and gas value chain, from wellhead to crude refining and through to specialty chemicals production.  In addition to sharing many of the same customers, these brands share the approach of early and continuous customer involvement as they deliver optimal solutions to meet customer objectives through early planning and scope definition, advanced technologies, and project lifecycle support.
Engineering & Construction ("E&C"). Our E&C business segment leverages our operational and technical excellence as a global provider of engineering, procurement, construction ("EPC"), commissioning and maintenance services for oil and gas, refining, petrochemical and chemical customers.  E&C is managed on a geographic basis in order to facilitate close proximity to our customers and our people, while utilizing a consistent global execution strategy. 
Government Services ("GS"). Our GS business segment focuses on long-term service contracts with annuity streams, particularly for the United Kingdom ("U.K."), Australian and U.S. governments.
Non-strategic Business. Our Non-strategic Business segment represents the operations or activities that we intend to exit upon completion of existing contracts. This segment also included businesses we exited upon sale to third parties during 2015.
Other. Our Other business segment includes our corporate expenses and general and administrative expenses not allocated to the business segments above and any future activities that do not individually meet the criteria for segment presentation. 

The following table presents revenues, gross profit (loss), equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates and operating income (loss) by reporting segment.

11



Operations by Reportable Segment
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
Dollars in millions
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Technology & Consulting
$
98

 
$
80

 
$
195

 
$
152

Engineering & Construction
621

 
953

 
1,227

 
1,930

Government Services
229

 
158

 
439

 
313

Other

 

 

 

Subtotal
948

 
1,191

 
1,861

 
2,395

Non-strategic Business
61

 
190

 
144

 
422

Total revenues
$
1,009

 
$
1,381

 
$
2,005

 
$
2,817

Gross profit (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Technology & Consulting
$
15

 
$
21

 
$
32

 
$
40

Engineering & Construction
35

 
52

 
64

 
107

Government Services
41

 
(1
)
 
62

 
(5
)
Other

 

 

 

Subtotal
91

 
72

 
158

 
142

Non-strategic Business
(17
)
 
2

 
(16
)
 
2

Total gross profit (loss)
$
74

 
$
74

 
$
142

 
$
144

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Technology & Consulting
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

Engineering & Construction
23

 
40

 
41

 
61

Government Services
10

 
13

 
21

 
27

Other

 

 

 

Subtotal
33

 
53

 
62

 
88

Non-strategic Business

 

 

 

Total equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
$
33

 
$
53

 
$
62

 
$
88

Segment operating income (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Technology & Consulting
$
13

 
$
20

 
$
28

 
$
37

Engineering & Construction
40

 
74

 
77

 
140

Government Services
49

 
10

 
79

 
19

Other
(22
)
 
(36
)
 
(44
)
 
(64
)
Subtotal
80

 
68

 
140

 
132

Non-strategic Business
(17
)
 
28

 
(12
)
 
28

Total segment operating income (loss)
$
63

 
$
96

 
$
128

 
$
160


Changes in Estimates

There are many factors that may affect the accuracy of our cost estimates and ultimately our future profitability. These include, but are not limited to, the availability and costs of resources (such as labor, materials and equipment), productivity and weather, and for unit rate and construction service contracts, the availability and detail of customer supplied engineering drawings. In the past, we have realized both lower and higher than expected margins and have incurred losses as a result of unforeseen changes in our project costs. We recognize revisions of revenues and costs in the period in which the revisions are known. This may result in the recognition of costs before the recognition of related revenue recovery, if any. However, historically, our estimates have been reasonably dependable regarding the recognition of revenues and profit on percentage of completion contracts. Significant changes in estimates by business segment, which impacted operating income during the periods presented, are as follows:

12



Engineering & Construction

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, revenues, gross profit, and segment operating income include $36 million and $56 million, respectively, related to a change in estimate resulting from a settlement on close out of an liquefied natural gas ("LNG") project in Africa.

During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2016, we recognized unfavorable changes in estimates of losses of $39 million and $70 million, respectively, primarily due to equipment failure during plant start-up on an EPC ammonia project in the U.S. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, we recognized an unfavorable change in estimated costs at completion of $2 million, primarily due to increased subcontractor costs. This project became a loss contract during the three months ended June 30, 2015. Included in the reserve for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts, which is a component of "other current liabilities" on our condensed consolidated financial statements is $5 million and $4 million as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, related to this project. The project is 96% complete as of June 30, 2016, and we expect to complete it by the end of 2016.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 we recognized favorable changes in estimates of losses of $18 million and $16 million, respectively, on our seven Canadian pipe fabrication and module assembly projects, primarily due to negotiated settlements. As of June 30, 2015 the reserve for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts which is a component of "other current liabilities" on our condensed consolidated financial statements included $11 million for these projects which were completed in 2015.

Government Services

During the three months ended June 30, 2016, revenues, gross profit, and segment operating income included a favorable change in estimate of $33 million as a result of a settlement with the U.S. government regarding reimbursement of previously expensed legal fees associated with the sodium dichromate litigation. See Note 12 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for information related to the settlement with the U.S. government. The six months ended June 30, 2016 included the $33 million favorable change discussed above and $15 million favorable change related to the approval of a change order on a road construction project in the Middle East in the first quarter of 2016.

Non-strategic Business

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, we recognized unfavorable changes in estimates of losses on a power project of $21 million and $26 million, respectively, primarily due to increased subcontractor costs. Included in the reserve for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts within "other current liabilities" is $26 million and $47 million as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, related to the power project discussed above. The project is 84% complete as of June 30, 2016, and we expect to complete it in the first half of 2017.

Our estimates of revenues and costs at completion have been, and may continue to be, impacted by our performance, the performance of our subcontractors, and the U.S. labor market. Our estimated losses at completion as of June 30, 2016 represents our best estimate based on current information. Actual results could differ from the estimates we have used to account for this power project as of June 30, 2016.

Acquisitions, Dispositions and Other Transactions

On January 11, 2016, we acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock of three subsidiaries of Connell Chemical Industry LLC (through its subsidiary, Chematur Technologies AB): Plinke GmbH ("Plinke"), Weatherly Inc., ("Weatherly"), and Chematur Ecoplanning Oy ("Ecoplanning"). Plinke specializes in proprietary technology and specialist equipment for the purification and concentration of inorganic acids used or produced in hydrocarbon processing facilities. Weatherly provides nitric acid and ammonium nitrate proprietary technologies and services to the fertilizer market. Ecoplanning offers proprietary evaporation and crystallization technologies and specialist equipment for weak acid and base solutions. As a result of this acquisition, we can expand our technology and consulting solutions into new markets while leveraging KBR's global sales and EPC capabilities.

In accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 805, Business Combinations, we accounted for this transaction using the acquisition method. We effected the acquisition through $25 million in cash paid to the seller, less $3 million of acquired cash for net cash consideration of $22 million. The consideration paid included an escrow of $5 million that secures the indemnification obligations of the seller and other contingent obligations related to the operation of the business. We conducted an external valuation of certain acquired assets for inclusion in our balance sheet at the date of acquisition. Assets that would not normally be recorded in ordinary operations (i.e., customer relationships and other intangibles) were recorded at

13



their estimated fair values. The excess of preliminary purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired was recorded as goodwill.

The goodwill of $22 million arising from the acquisition relates primarily to future growth opportunities to extend the acquired technologies outside North America to new customers and in revamping units of the existing customer base globally. None of the goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes. The purchase price allocation is substantially complete with the exception of the valuation of pre-acquisition contingencies, final tax returns that provide the underlying tax basis of assets and liabilities, and final appraisals of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. We expect to complete the purchase price allocation during the 12-month period following the acquisition date, in line with the acquisition method of accounting, during which time the value of the assets and liabilities, including any goodwill, may be revised as appropriate. This acquisition will be reported within our T&C business segment. We recognized costs related to this acquisition of $1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2016.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid for this acquisition and the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date and subsequent working capital adjustments.
Dollars in millions
 
Fair value of total consideration transferred
$
25

 
 
Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
 
Tangible assets (a)
23

Intangible assets (b)
19

Liabilities (c)
(33
)
Liabilities arising from contingencies (d)
(6
)
 
 
Goodwill
$
22

 
(a)
Includes $13 million of trade receivables and similar amounts due from customers and indemnification assets related to the contingent liabilities.
(b)
Includes developed technology of $10 million and customer relationships of $7 million. These intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives up to 20 years.
(c)
Reflects BIE, accounts payable and other accrued liabilities (current) of $17 million and non-current liabilities of $16 million.
(d)
Fair value reflects our best estimate of certain contingencies pending final evaluation.

As a result of this acquisition, $4 million and $14 million of revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, and $(2) million and $1 million of gross profit (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, were included in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

In February 2016, we executed agreements to establish a new joint venture within our GS business segment. See Note 8 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for information related to the establishment of this new joint venture.

Subsequent Event

On July 1, 2016, we acquired Wyle, Inc. ("Wyle") in accordance with an agreement and plan of merger, pursuant to which a wholly owned subsidiary of KBR merged with and into Wyle, with Wyle continuing as a wholly owned subsidiary of KBR (the "Merger"). Aggregate consideration for the Merger was $600 million, including the repayment of outstanding balances under Wyle's credit facility and other transaction expenses, and is subject to certain post-closing adjustments. We funded $400 million of the cash paid with borrowings under our Credit Agreement. See Note 10 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for information related to our Credit Agreement. Wyle delivers an array of custom solutions for customers in the U.S. Department of Defense, NASA and other federal agencies. Wyle's expertise includes systems and sustainment engineering, program and acquisition management, life science research, space medical operations, information technology and the testing and evaluation of aircraft, advanced systems and networks. The Merger will combine KBR's strengths in international, large-scale government logistics and support operations with Wyle's specialized technical services, largely focused in the contiguous U.S. We recognized costs related to this acquisition of $1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2016.


14



We will account for the Merger using the acquisition method under ASC 805, Business Combinations. Due to the limited time since the acquisition date, we have not completed the initial accounting for the acquisition.

Note 3. Cash and Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and equivalents include cash balances held by our wholly owned subsidiaries as well as cash held by joint ventures that we consolidate. Joint venture cash balances are limited to joint venture activities and are not available for other projects, general cash needs or distribution to us without approval of the board of directors of the respective joint ventures. We expect to use joint venture cash for project costs and distributions of earnings related to joint venture operations. However, some of the earnings distributions may be paid to other KBR entities where the cash can be used for general corporate needs.

The components of our cash and equivalents balance are as follows:
 
June 30, 2016
Dollars in millions
International (a)
 
Domestic (b)
 
Total
Operating cash and equivalents
$
116

 
$
287

 
$
403

Short-term investments (c)
263

 
88

 
351

Cash and equivalents held in joint ventures
44

 
6

 
50

Total
$
423

 
$
381

 
$
804


 
December 31, 2015
Dollars in millions
International (a)
 
Domestic (b)
 
Total
Operating cash and equivalents
$
177

 
$
253

 
$
430

Short-term investments (c)
293

 
107

 
400

Cash and equivalents held in joint ventures
49

 
4

 
53

Total
$
519

 
$
364

 
$
883

 
(a)
Includes deposits held in non-U.S. operating accounts.
(b)
Includes U.S. dollar and foreign currency deposits held in operating accounts that constitute onshore cash for tax purposes but may reside either in the U.S. or in a foreign country.
(c)
Includes time deposits, money market funds, and other highly liquid short-term investments.

Note 4. Accounts Receivable
    
The components of our accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts balance are as follows:
 
June 30, 2016
Dollars in millions
Retainage
 
Trade & Other
 
Total
Technology & Consulting
$
3

 
$
50

 
$
53

Engineering & Construction
65

 
402

 
467

Government Services
2

 
75

 
77

Other

 
2

 
2

Subtotal
70

 
529

 
599

Non-strategic Business
5

 
14

 
19

Total
$
75

 
$
543

 
$
618



15



 
December 31, 2015
Dollars in millions
Retainage
 
Trade & Other
 
Total
Technology & Consulting
$

 
$
70

 
$
70

Engineering & Construction
51

 
402

 
453

Government Services
2

 
75

 
77

Other

 
2

 
2

Subtotal
53

 
549

 
602

Non-strategic Business
9

 
17

 
26

Total
$
62

 
$
566

 
$
628


Note 5. Costs and Estimated Earnings in Excess of Billings on Uncompleted Contracts and Billings in Excess of Costs and Estimated Earnings on Uncompleted Contracts
Our CIE balances by business segment are as follows:
 
June 30,
 
December 31,
Dollars in millions
2016
 
2015
Technology & Consulting
$
39

 
$
42

Engineering & Construction
100

 
114

Government Services
113

 
68

Subtotal
252

 
224

Non-strategic Business

 

Total
$
252

 
$
224


Our BIE balances by business segment are as follows:
 
June 30,
 
December 31,
Dollars in millions
2016
 
2015
Technology & Consulting
$
64

 
$
72

Engineering & Construction
346

 
307

Government Services
55

 
69

Subtotal
465

 
448

Non-strategic Business
43

 
61

Total
$
508

 
$
509


Unapproved change orders and claims

The amounts of unapproved change orders and claims included in determining the profit or loss on contracts are as follows:
Dollars in millions
2016
 
2015
Amounts included in project estimates-at-completion at January 1,
$
46

 
$
31

Additions
70

 
42

Approved change orders
(27
)
 
(21
)
Adjustment due to disposition of business

 
(6
)
Amounts included in project estimates-at-completion at June 30,
$
89

 
$
46

 
 
 
 
Amounts recorded in revenues on a percentage-of-completion basis at June 30,
$
44

 
$
35



16



The table above excludes unapproved change orders and claims related to our unconsolidated affiliates. Our proportionate share of unapproved change orders and claims was $67 million as of June 30, 2016 and $73 million as of June 30, 2015 on a project in our E&C business segment.

Liquidated damages

Some of our engineering and construction contracts have schedule dates and performance obligations that if not met could subject us to penalties for liquidated damages. These generally relate to specified activities that must be completed by a set contractual date or by achievement of a specified level of output or throughput. Each contract defines the conditions under which a customer may make a claim for liquidated damages. However, in some instances, liquidated damages are not asserted by the customer, but the potential to do so is used in negotiating or settling claims and closing out the contract. Any accrued liquidated damages are recognized as a reduction in revenues in the consolidated statements of operations.

It is possible that liquidated damages related to several projects totaling $7 million at June 30, 2016 and $6 million at December 31, 2015 could be incurred if the projects are completed as currently forecasted. However, based upon our evaluation of our performance, we have concluded these liquidated damages are not probable and therefore, they have not been recognized.

Note 6. Claims and Accounts Receivable

The components of our claims and accounts receivable account balance not expected to be collected within the next 12 months are as follows:
 
June 30,
 
December 31,
Dollars in millions
2016
 
2015
Engineering & Construction
$
400

 
$
400

Government Services
132

 
126

Total
$
532

 
$
526


Our E&C business segment's claims and accounts receivable is related to our EPC 1 arbitration. See Note 13 to our condensed consolidated financial statements under PEMEX and PEP Arbitration for further discussion.

Our GS business segment's claims and accounts receivable reflects claims filed with the U.S. government related to payments not yet received for cost incurred under various U.S. government contracts. These claims relate to disputed costs or contracts where our costs have exceeded the U.S. government's funded value on the task order.  Included in the amount above is $83 million as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, related to Form 1s issued by the U.S. government questioning or objecting to costs billed to them. See Note 12 of our condensed consolidated financial statements for additional discussions. This amount also includes $49 million and $43 million as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, related to contracts where our costs have exceeded the U.S. government's funded values on the underlying task orders or task orders where the U.S. government has not authorized us to bill. We believe such disputed costs will be resolved in our favor at which time the U.S. government will be required to obligate funds from appropriations for the year in which resolution occurs.


17



Note 7. Restructuring

In connection with our long-term strategic reorganization, we announced that beginning in the fourth quarter of 2014 we would undertake a restructuring, which would include actions such as reducing the amount of real estate we utilized and significantly reducing our workforce. There were additional actions undertaken in 2015 and 2016, including staff reductions to support current business levels. The employees affected by these reductions are eligible for separation benefits upon their termination and the dates have occurred or are expected to occur through 2018. The table below provides a rollforward of one-time charges associated with employee terminations based on the fair value of the termination benefits. These amounts are included in "other current liabilities" on our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Dollars in millions
Severance Accrual
Balance at December 31, 2015
$
19

Charges
11

Payments
(16
)
Balance at June 30, 2016
$
14

 
 
Balance at December 31, 2014
$
21

Charges
11

Payments
(15
)
Balance at June 30, 2015
$
17


Note 8. Equity Method Investments and Variable Interest Entities

We conduct some of our operations through joint ventures which operate through partnership, corporation, undivided interest and other business forms and are principally accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Additionally, the majority of our joint ventures are VIEs.

The following table presents a rollforward of our equity in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates:
 
June 30,
 
December 31,
Dollars in millions
2016
 
2015
Beginning balance
$
281

 
$
151

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
62

 
149

Distribution of earnings of unconsolidated affiliates (b)
(28
)
 
(92
)
Advances (Receipts)
8

 
(10
)
Investments (a)
1

 
80

Foreign currency translation adjustments
(4
)
 
(9
)
Other
(5
)
 
1

Balance before reclassification
$
315

 
$
270

Reclassification of excess distributions (b)
6

 
16

Recognition of excess distributions (b)
(5
)
 
(5
)
Ending balance
$
316

 
$
281

 
(a)
In 2015, investments included a $58 million investment in the Brown & Root Industrial Services joint venture, a $24 million investment in EPIC Piping LLC ("EPIC") joint venture, and the disposition of a joint venture included in the sale of the Building Group.
(b)
We received cash dividends in excess of the carrying value of one of our investments. We have no obligation to return any portion of the cash dividends received. We recorded the excess dividend amount as "deferred income from unconsolidated affiliates" on our condensed consolidated balance sheets and recognize these dividends as earnings are generated by the investment.


18



Equity Method Investments

New Investments

U.K. Military Flying Training System ("UKMFTS") project. In February 2016, Affinity Flying Training Services Ltd. ("Affinity"), a joint venture between KBR and Elbit Systems, was awarded a service contract by a third party to procure, operate and maintain aircraft, and aircraft-related assets over an 18-year contract period, in support of the UKMFTS project. KBR owns a 50% interest in Affinity. In addition, KBR owns a 50% interest in the two joint ventures, Affinity Capital Works and Affinity Flying Services, which provide procurement, operations and management support services under subcontracts with Affinity. The remaining 50% interest in these entities is held by Elbit Systems. KBR has provided its proportionate share of certain limited financial and performance guarantees in support of the partners' contractual obligations. The three project-related entities are VIEs; however, KBR is not the primary beneficiary of any of these entities.  We account for KBR's interests in each entity using the equity method of accounting within our GS business segment. The project is funded through KBR and Elbit Systems provided equity, subordinated debt and non-recourse third party commercial bank debt.  During the first quarter of 2016, under the terms of the subordinated debt agreement between the partners and Affinity, we advanced our proportionate share, or $14 million, to meet initial working capital needs of the venture. We expect repayment on the advance and the associated interest over the term of the project. The amount is included in the "equity in and advances" balance on our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2016 and in "payments from (advances to) unconsolidated affiliates, net" in our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities

Generally, our maximum exposure to loss is limited to our equity investment in the joint venture and any amounts payable to us for services we provided to the joint venture reduced for any unearned revenues on the projects. On the Affinity joint venture, our maximum exposure to loss is limited to our proportionate share of any amounts required to fund future losses incurred by those entities under their respective contracts with the project company. On the Aspire Defence project, in addition to the maximum exposure to loss indicated in the table below, we have exposure to any losses incurred by the construction or operating joint ventures under their respective subcontract arrangements with the project company. Our exposure is, however, limited to our equity participation in these entities. The Ichthys LNG joint venture executes a project that has a lump sum component; in addition to the maximum exposure to loss indicated in the table below, we have an exposure to losses to the extent of our ownership percentage in the joint venture if the project exceeds the lump sum component. Our maximum exposure to loss on the EBIC Ammonia plant reflects our 65% ownership of the development corporation which owns 25% of the company that consolidates the ammonia plant. We continue to monitor our investment in this joint venture as the profitability of its operations has been impacted by the challenges related to the availability of natural gas feedstock in Egypt.

The following summarizes the total assets and total liabilities as reflected in our condensed consolidated balance sheets as well as our maximum exposure to losses related to our unconsolidated VIEs in which we have a significant variable interest but are not the primary beneficiary.

 
June 30, 2016
Dollars in millions
Total assets
 
Total liabilities
 
Maximum
exposure to 
loss
Affinity project
$
14

 
$
3

 
$
14

Aspire Defence project
$
15

 
$
111

 
$
15

Ichthys LNG project
$
104

 
$
58

 
$
104

U.K. Road projects
$
33

 
$
10

 
$
33

EBIC Ammonia plant (65% interest)
$
34

 
$
2

 
$
21

 

19



 
December 31, 2015
Dollars in millions
Total assets
 
Total liabilities
 
Maximum
exposure to 
loss
Aspire Defence project
$
17

 
$
121

 
$
17

Ichthys LNG project
$
87

 
$
63

 
$
87

U.K. Road projects
$
34

 
$
11

 
$
34

EBIC Ammonia plant (65% interest)
$
36

 
$
2

 
$
22


Related Party Transactions

We often provide engineering, construction management and other subcontractor services to our joint ventures and our revenues include amounts related to these services. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, our revenues included $151 million and $127 million, respectively, related to the services we provided to our joint ventures, primarily within our E&C business segment. Under the terms of our transition services agreement ("TSA") with Brown & Root Industrial Services joint venture, we collect cash from customers and make payments to vendors and employees on behalf of the joint venture. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, we incurred approximately $8 million of reimbursable costs under the TSA. In addition, in 2015, we entered into an alliance agreement with our EPIC joint venture to provide certain pipe fabrication services to KBR. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, EPIC performed $15 million of services to KBR under the agreement.

Amounts included in our condensed consolidated balance sheets related to services we provided to our unconsolidated joint ventures as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are as follows:
 
June 30,
 
December 31,
Dollars in millions
2016
 
2015
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts (a)
$
23

 
$
7

Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts (c)
$
3

 
$
5

Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts (c)
$
54

 
$
55

Accounts payable (b)
$

 
$
9

 
(a)
Includes a $13 million receivable from the Brown & Root Industrial Services joint venture at June 30, 2016.
(b)
Reflects a $9 million payable to the Brown & Root Industrial Services joint venture at December 31, 2015.
(c)
Reflects CIE and BIE primarily related to joint ventures within our E&C business segment as discussed above.

Consolidated Variable Interest Entities

We consolidate VIEs if we determine we are the primary beneficiary of the project entity because we control the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the entity. The following is a summary of the significant VIEs where we are the primary beneficiary:
Dollars in millions
June 30, 2016
Total assets
 
Total liabilities
Gorgon LNG project
$
27

 
$
62

Escravos Gas-to-Liquids project
$
17

 
$
33

Fasttrax Limited project
$
61

 
$
57

 

Dollars in millions
December 31, 2015
Total assets
 
Total liabilities
Gorgon LNG project
$
117

 
$
145

Escravos Gas-to-Liquids project
$
16

 
$
33

Fasttrax Limited project
$
74

 
$
70




20



Note 9. Pension Plans

The components of net periodic benefit cost related to pension benefits for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
Dollars in millions
United States
 
Int’l
 
United States
 
Int’l
Components of net periodic benefit cost
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Service cost
$

 
$
1

 
$

 
$
1

Interest cost

 
16

 

 
19

Expected return on plan assets

 
(23
)
 
(1
)
 
(25
)
Recognized actuarial loss
1

 
7

 
2

 
11

Net periodic benefit cost
$
1

 
$
1

 
$
1

 
$
6

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
Dollars in millions
United States
 
Int’l
 
United States
 
Int’l
Components of net periodic benefit cost
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Service cost
$

 
$
1

 
$

 
$
1

Interest cost
1

 
33

 
1

 
38

Expected return on plan assets
(1
)
 
(46
)
 
(2
)
 
(49
)
Recognized actuarial loss
1

 
14

 
3

 
22

Net periodic benefit cost
$
1

 
$
2

 
$
2

 
$
12


For the six months ended June 30, 2016, we have contributed approximately $21 million of the $41 million we expect to contribute to our international plans in 2016.

Note 10. Debt and Other Credit Facilities

Credit Agreement

On September 25, 2015, we entered into a $1 billion, unsecured revolving credit agreement (the "Credit Agreement") with a syndicate of banks. The Credit Agreement is guaranteed by certain of the Company's domestic subsidiaries, matures in September 2020 and is available for cash borrowings and the issuance of letters of credit related to general corporate needs. Subject to certain conditions, we may request (i) that the aggregate commitments under the Credit Agreement be increased by up to an additional $500 million, and (ii) that the maturity date of the Credit Agreement be extended by two additional one-year terms.

Amounts drawn under the Credit Agreement will bear interest at variable rates, per annum, based either on (i) the London interbank offered rate ("LIBOR") plus an applicable margin of 1.375% to 1.75%, or (ii) a base rate plus an applicable margin of 0.375% to 0.75%, with the base rate equal to the highest of (a) reference bank’s publicly announced base rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%, or (c) LIBOR plus 1%. The amount of the applicable margin to be applied will be determined by the Company’s ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated EBITDA for the prior four fiscal quarters as defined in the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement provides for fees on letters of credit issued under the Credit Agreement at a rate equal to the applicable margin for LIBOR-based loans, except for performance letters of credit, which are priced at 50% of such applicable margin. KBR pays an annual issuance fee of 0.125% of the face amount of a letter of credit and pays a commitment fee of 0.225% to 0.25%, per annum, on any unused portion of the commitment under the Credit Agreement based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio. As of June 30, 2016, there were $116 million in letters of credit and no cash borrowings outstanding.


21



The Credit Agreement contains customary covenants as defined by the agreement which include financial covenants requiring maintenance of a ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated EBITDA not greater than 3.5 to 1 and a minimum consolidated net worth of $1.2 billion plus 50% of consolidated net income for each quarter beginning September 30, 2015 and 100% of any increase in shareholders’ equity attributable to the sale of equity interests, but excluding any adjustments in shareholders' equity attributable to changes in foreign currency translation adjustments. As of June 30, 2016, we were in compliance with our financial covenants.

The Credit Agreement contains a number of other covenants restricting, among other things, our ability to incur additional liens and indebtedness, enter into asset sales, repurchase our equity shares and make certain types of investments. Our subsidiaries are restricted from incurring indebtedness, except if such indebtedness relates to purchase money obligations, capitalized leases, refinancing or renewals secured by liens upon or in property acquired, constructed or improved in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $200 million at any time outstanding. Additionally, our subsidiaries may incur unsecured indebtedness not to exceed $200 million in aggregate outstanding principal amount at any time. We are also permitted to repurchase our equity shares, provided that no such repurchases shall be made from proceeds borrowed under the Credit Agreement, and that the aggregate purchase price and dividends paid after September 25, 2015, does not exceed the Distribution Cap (equal to the sum of $750 million plus the lesser of (1) $400 million and (2) the amount received by us in connection with the arbitration and subsequent litigation of the PEP contracts as discussed in Note 13 to our condensed consolidated financial statements). As of June 30, 2016, the remaining availability under the Distribution Cap was approximately $675 million.

Subsequent Event. As a result of the July 1, 2016 Merger discussed in Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements, we funded $400 million with borrowings under our Credit Agreement. This borrowing bears interest based on the one month LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin currently equal to approximately 1.842% per annum and will reset for each subsequent period for which a borrowing is outstanding at the applicable LIBOR and margin rates. We intend to seek long-term financing to replace this debt by the end of 2016.

Nonrecourse Project Debt

Fasttrax Limited, a joint venture in which we indirectly own a 50% equity interest with an unrelated partner, was awarded a concession contract in 2001 with the U.K. Ministry of Defense ("MoD") to provide a Heavy Equipment Transporter Service to the British Army. Under the terms of the arrangement, Fasttrax Limited operates and maintains 91 heavy equipment transporters ("HETs") for a term of 22 years. The purchase of the HETs by the joint venture was financed through two series of bonds secured by the assets of Fasttrax Limited and a bridge loan totaling approximately £84.9 million (approximately $120 million at the exchange rate on the date of the transaction). The secured bonds are an obligation of Fasttrax Limited and are not a debt obligation of KBR as they are nonrecourse to the joint venture partners. Accordingly, in the event of a default on the notes, the lenders may only look to the assets of Fasttrax Limited for repayment. The bridge loan of approximately £12.2 million (approximately $17 million at the exchange rate on the date of the transaction) was replaced when the joint venture partners funded their equity and subordinated debt contributions in 2005.

The secured bonds were issued in two classes consisting of Class A 3.5% Index Linked Bonds in the amount of £56 million (approximately $79 million at the exchange rate on the date of the transaction) and Class B 5.9% Fixed Rate Bonds in the amount of £16.7 million (approximately $24 million at the exchange rate on the date of the transaction).  Semi-annual payments on both classes of bonds commenced in March 2005 and will continue through maturity in 2021.  The subordinated notes payable to each of the partners initially bear interest at 11.25% increasing to 16% over the term of the notes until maturity in 2025.  Semi-annual payments on the subordinated notes commenced in March 2006. For financial reporting purposes, only our partner's portion of the subordinated notes appears in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Note 11. Income Taxes

The effective tax rate was approximately 33% and 29% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was approximately 25% and 26%, respectively. The increase in our tax rate for 2016 is primarily due to changes in the jurisdictional mix of our income before provision for income taxes, including our equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates as well as project losses in the U.S. for which we do not recognize tax benefits.

Our estimated annual effective tax rate for 2016 is currently projected to be 30%, which is lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35% due to lower tax rates related to noncontrolling interests and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates of approximately 8% offset by forecasted income in higher tax rate jurisdictions. Our estimated annual effective rate is subject to change based on the actual jurisdictions where our 2016 earnings are generated.


22



The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $536 million and $542 million, respectively. The change in the valuation allowance was $(6) million and $(13) million in the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $(6) million and $(12) million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The valuation allowance is primarily related to foreign tax credit carryforwards, foreign and state net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets that, in the judgment of management, are not more-likely-than-not to be realized. The decrease in the valuation allowance for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 reflect a reduction in the valuation of our foreign tax credit carryforwards. The tax benefit associated with the reduction in the valuation allowance is reflected in our estimated annual effective tax rate for the year.

The reserve for uncertain tax positions included in "other liabilities" and "deferred income taxes" on our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $262 million and $257 million, respectively.

Note 12. U.S. Government Matters

We provide services to various U.S. governmental agencies, which include the U.S. Department of Defense ("DoD") and the Department of State. We may have disagreements or experience performance issues on our U.S. government contracts. When performance issues arise under any of these contracts, the U.S. government retains the right to pursue various remedies, including challenges to expenditures, suspension of payments, fines and suspensions or debarment from future business with the U.S. government.

Between 2002 and 2011, we provided significant support to the U.S. Army and other U.S. government agencies in support of the war in Iraq under the LogCAP III contract. We continue to support the U.S. government around the world under the LogCAP IV and other contracts. We have been in the process of closeout of the LogCAP III contract since 2011, and we expect the closeout process to continue through at least 2017. As a result of our work under LogCAP III, there are claims and disputes pending between us and the U.S. government which need to be resolved in order to close the contracts. The closeout process includes resolving objections raised by the U.S. government through a billing dispute process referred to as Form 1s and Memorandums for Record ("MFRs") and resolving results from U.S. government audits. We continue to work with the U.S. government to resolve these issues and are engaged in efforts to reach mutually acceptable resolution of these outstanding matters. However, for certain of these matters, we have filed claims with the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals ("ASBCA") or the U.S. Court of Federal Claims ("COFC"). We also have matters related to ongoing litigation or investigations involving U.S. government contracts. We anticipate billing additional labor, vendor resolution and litigation costs as we resolve the open matters. At this time, we cannot determine the timing or net amounts to be collected or paid to close out these contracts.

Form 1s

The U.S. government has issued Form 1s questioning or objecting to costs we billed to them primarily related to (1) our use of private security and our provision of containerized housing under the LogCAP III contract discussed above and (2) our provision of emergency construction services primarily to U.S. government facilities damaged by Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma, under our CONCAP III contract with the U.S. Navy. As a consequence of the issuance of the Form 1s, the U.S. government has withheld payment to us on outstanding invoices, pending resolution of these matters. In certain cases, we have also withheld payment to our subcontractors related to pay-when-paid contractual terms.

The U.S. government had issued Form 1s, questioning $173 million of billed costs as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. They had previously paid us $90 million as of each period related to our services on these contracts and the remaining balance of $83 million for each period is included in “claims and accounts receivable" on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. In addition, we have withheld $32 million from our subcontractors at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, related to these questioned costs.

While we continue to believe that the amounts we have invoiced the U.S. government are in compliance with our contract terms and that recovery is probable, we also continue to evaluate our ability to recover these amounts as new information becomes known. As is common in the industry, negotiating and resolving these matters is often an involved and lengthy process, which sometimes necessitates the filing of claims or other legal action as discussed above. Concurrent with our continued negotiations with the U.S. government, we await the rulings on the filed claims. We are unable to predict when the rulings will be issued or when the matters will be settled or resolved with the U.S. government.

23




Audits

In addition to reviews performed by the U.S. government through the Form 1 process, the negotiation, administration and settlement of our contracts, which primarily consist of DoD contracts, are subject to audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency ("DCAA"). The U.S. government DCAA serves in an advisory role to the Defense Contract Management Agency ("DCMA") and the DCMA is responsible for the administration of the majority of our contracts. The scope of these audits include, among other things, the validity of direct and indirect incurred costs, provisional approval of annual billing rates, approval of annual overhead rates, compliance with the Federal Acquisition Regulations ("FAR") and Cost Accounting Standards ("CAS"), compliance with certain unique contract clauses and audits of certain aspects of our internal control systems.

As of June 30, 2016, we have completed the negotiation of both direct and indirect incurred costs for the years of significant performance under LogCAP III (2003-2011). The DCAA has commenced its review of the incurred costs for 2012, and is scheduling its reviews for the years 2013 and beyond. The direct claimed cost for these years still to be reviewed was $1 billion, which is significantly less than prior periods. The indirect costs invoiced for these years amounts to $78 million.

Historically, we have recovered 99.9% of the direct and indirect costs we have claimed for reimbursement from the U.S. government. As a result, for the open audit years we have accrued our estimate of disallowed costs based on our historical recovery rate as a reduction to "claims and accounts receivable" and in "other liabilities" on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Based on the information received to date, we do not believe the ongoing government audits will have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

As a result of the Form 1s, open audits and claims discussed above, we have accrued a reserve for unallowable costs at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 of $48 million and $50 million, respectively, as a reduction to "claims and accounts receivable" and in "other liabilities" on our condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Investigations, Qui Tams and Litigation

The following matters relate to ongoing litigation or federal investigations involving U.S. government contracts. Many of these matters involve allegations of violations of the False Claims Act ("FCA"), which prohibits in general terms fraudulent billings to the government. Suits brought by private individuals are called "qui tams."

First Kuwaiti Trading Company arbitration. In April 2008, First Kuwaiti Trading Company ("FKTC"), one of our LogCAP III subcontractors providing housing containers, filed for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association of all its claims under various LogCAP III subcontracts. FKTC sought damages in the amount of $134 million. After complete hearings on all of FKTC's claims, an arbitration panel awarded $17 million and interest to FKTC for claims involving damages on lost or unreturned vehicles. In addition, we determined that we owe FKTC $32 million in connection with other subcontracts. We paid FKTC $19 million and will pay $4 million on pay-when-paid terms in the contract. We have accrued amounts we believe are payable to FKTC in "accounts payable" and "other current liabilities" on our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The remaining $26 million owed to FKTC under contract has not been billed to the government and we will not do so until the related claims and disputes between KBR and the government over the FKTC living container contract are resolved (see Department of Justice ("DOJ") False Claims Act complaint - FKTC Containers below).

We believe any cost or damages ultimately awarded to FKTC will be billable under the LogCAP III contract. As with all costs that are billed under LogCAP III, these costs would be subject to audit by the DCAA for reasonableness. At this time, we believe that the likelihood we would incur a loss related to this matter in excess of the amounts we have accrued is remote.

Electrocution litigation. During 2008, a lawsuit was filed against KBR in Pittsburgh, PA, in the Allegheny County Common Pleas Court alleging that the Company was responsible for an electrical incident which resulted in the death of a soldier at the Radwaniyah Palace Complex near Baghdad, Iraq. Plaintiffs are claiming unspecified damages for personal injury, death and loss of consortium by the parents. After extensive motion practice and appeals, the case is back before the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania for further action. KBR will continue to pursue all available jurisdictional and other dismissal options. At this time, we believe the likelihood we would incur a loss related to this matter is remote. As of June 30, 2016, no amounts have been accrued.

We believe the costs of litigation and any damages which might be awarded are either covered by insurance or will be billable under the LogCAP III contract. As with all costs that are billed under LogCAP III, these costs would be subject to audit by the DCAA for reasonableness.

24




Burn Pit litigation. From November 2008 through current, KBR has been served with in excess of 60 lawsuits in various states alleging exposure to toxic materials resulting from the operation of burn pits in Iraq or Afghanistan in connection with services provided by KBR under the LogCAP III contract. Each lawsuit has multiple named plaintiffs and seeks class certification. The plaintiffs are claiming unspecified damages. All of the pending cases were removed to Federal Court and have been consolidated for multi-district litigation treatment before the U.S. Federal District Court in Baltimore, Maryland. After extensive motion practice and appeals the cases are now back before the U.S. Federal District Court in Baltimore, Maryland for further action in conformity with the Fourth Circuit's ruling on appeal. KBR will continue to pursue all available jurisdictional and other dismissal options. At this time, we believe the likelihood that we would incur a loss related to this matter is remote. As of June 30, 2016, no amounts have been accrued.

We believe any costs of litigation and any damages which might be awarded will be billable under the LogCAP III contract. As with all costs that are billed under LogCAP III, these costs would be subject to audit by the DCAA for reasonableness.

Sodium Dichromate litigation. From December 2008 through September 2009, five cases were filed in various Federal District Courts against KBR by national guardsmen and other military personnel alleging exposure to sodium dichromate at the Qarmat Ali Water Treatment Plant in Iraq in 2003. The majority of the cases were re-filed and consolidated into two cases, before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas and the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon. The Oregon case was dismissed on appeal and consolidated with the case pending in the Southern District of Texas. The Texas case was then dismissed by the Court on the merits on multiple grounds including the conclusion that no one was injured and is now on appeal to the Fifth Circuit. The plaintiffs are claiming unspecified damages. At this time, we believe that the likelihood we would incur a loss related to this matter is remote.

The costs of litigation and any damages which might be awarded are billable under the Restore Iraqi Oil ("RIO") contract and the related indemnity agreement described below. As with all costs that are billed under RIO, these costs would be subject to audit by the DCAA for reasonableness.
 
COFC/ASBCA Claims. During the period of time since the first sodium dichromate litigation was filed, we have incurred legal defense costs that we believe are reimbursable under the related U.S. government contract. We have billed for these costs and filed claims to recover the associated costs incurred to date. Due to KBR's inability to procure adequate insurance coverage for this work, the Secretary of the Army approved the inclusion of an indemnification provision in the RIO Contract pursuant to Public Law 85-804.

KBR’s claims for payment were filed before the ASBCA. On December 23, 2014, we filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment asking the ASBCA to find that the sodium dichromate related incidents and litigation are within the definition of the "unusually hazardous risks" language in the 85-804 indemnity agreement. On August 17, 2015, the ASBCA issued an order holding that KBR is entitled to reimbursement of the sodium dichromate legal fees and any resulting judgments pursuant to the 85-804 indemnity agreement. As a result, the U.S. government has withdrawn its appeal of the ASBCA’s ruling and we have reached a settlement regarding reimbursement of the $33 million in legal fees and interest incurred through the time of the claim. As part of the settlement, all reasonable future defense costs and payment of awards will be reimbursed consistent with the Government's indemnity obligation.
  
Qui tams. On the active qui tams of which we are aware, the U.S. government has joined one of them (see DOJ FCA complaint - Iraq Subcontractor below). We believe the likelihood that we would incur a loss in the qui tams the U.S. government has not joined is remote and as of June 30, 2016, no amounts have been accrued. Costs incurred in defending the qui tams cannot be billed to the U.S. government until those matters are successfully resolved in our favor. If successfully resolved, we can bill 80% of the costs to the U.S. government under the federal regulations. As of June 30, 2016, we have incurred and expensed $9 million in legal costs to date in defending ourselves in qui tams. Five of the remaining qui tam cases either have been dismissed, are on appeal from a dismissal or are at the dismissal stage. There are two active cases as discussed below.

Barko qui tam. Relator Harry Barko, a KBR subcontracts administrator in Iraq for a year in 2004/2005, filed a qui tam lawsuit in June 2005 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (D.C.), alleging violations of the FCA by KBR and KBR subcontractors Daoud & Partners and Eamar Combined for General Trading and Contracting. The DOJ investigated Barko's allegations and elected not to intervene. The claim was unsealed in March of 2009.


25



Early phases of this case focused on discovery issues, and we successfully sought review and reversal of two trial court's opinion on KBR's attorney client and work product privileges. After the second reversal, KBR was notified that the case has been transferred to a new District Court Judge who is now considering KBR's motion for summary judgment. We believe the likelihood that we will incur a loss related to this matter is remote, and therefore as of June 30, 2016 we have not accrued any loss provisions related to this matter.

Howard qui tam. On March 27, 2011, Geoffrey Howard filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois in Rock Island, IL alleging that KBR mischarged the government $628 million for unnecessary materials and equipment. On October 7, 2014 the Department of Justice declined to intervene and the case was partially unsealed. We believe the claims lack merit, and we answered and filed a motion to dismiss which was denied on October 15, 2015. The case is starting discovery. We believe the likelihood that we will incur a loss related to this matter is remote, and therefore as of June 30, 2016 we have not accrued any loss provisions related to this matter.

DOJ False Claims Act complaint - FKTC Containers. In November 2012, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois in Rock Island, IL against KBR, FKTC and others, related to our settlement of delay claims by our subcontractor, FKTC, in connection with FKTC's provision of living trailers for the bed down mission in Iraq in 2003-2004. The DOJ alleges that KBR knew that FKTC had submitted inflated costs, that KBR did not verify the costs, that FKTC had contractually assumed the risk for the costs which KBR submitted to the U.S. government, that KBR concealed information about FKTC's costs from the U.S. government, that KBR claimed that an adequate price analysis had been done when in fact one had not been done and that KBR submitted false claims for reimbursement to the U.S. government in connection with FKTC's services during the bed down mission. Our contractual dispute with the Army over this settlement has been ongoing since 2005. On May 6, 2013, KBR filed a motion to dismiss and in March 2014 the motion to dismiss was denied. We filed our answer on May 2, 2014. On September 30, 2014, the District Court granted FKTC's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We expect discovery to be substantially completed in 2017. At this time, we believe the likelihood that we would incur a loss related to this matter is remote. As of June 30, 2016, no amounts have been accrued.

KBR Contract Claim on FKTC containers. KBR previously filed a claim before the ASBCA to recover the costs paid to FKTC to settle its delay and disruption claims. The DCMA had disallowed the majority of those costs. Those contract claims were stayed in 2013 at the request of the DOJ so that they could pursue the FCA case referenced above. On February 19, 2016, the ASBCA, at KBR’s request, lifted the stay and has allowed KBR to proceed with its contract claim for the costs withheld. KBR has requested a trial date as early in 2017 as the ASBCA’s schedule will permit.

DOJ False Claims Act complaint - Iraq Subcontractor. In January 2014, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois in Rock Island, IL, against KBR and two former KBR subcontractors, including FKTC, alleging that three former KBR employees were offered and accepted kickbacks from these subcontractors in exchange for favorable treatment in the award and performance of subcontracts to be awarded during the course of KBR's performance of the LogCAP III contract in Iraq. The complaint alleges that as a result of the kickbacks, we submitted invoices with inflated or unjustified subcontract prices, resulting in alleged violations of the FCA and the Anti-Kickback Act. The DOJ's investigation dates back to 2004. We self-reported most of the violations and tendered credits to the U.S. government as appropriate. On May 22, 2014, FTKC filed a motion to dismiss which the U.S. government opposed. On April 22, 2014, we filed our answer and in May 2014 the U.S. government filed a Motion to Strike certain affirmative defenses and this motion was granted on March 30, 2015. We do not believe this limits KBR's ability to fully defend all allegations in this matter. As of June 30, 2016, we have accrued our best estimate of probable loss related to an unfavorable settlement of this matter in "other liabilities" on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. At this time, we believe the likelihood that we would incur a loss related to this matter in excess of the amounts we have accrued is remote. Discovery in the case is set to close July 13, 2017 with the trial set to begin January 22, 2018.

Note 13. Other Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation and regulatory matters related to the Company’s restatement of its 2013 annual financial statements
In re KBR, Inc. Securities Litigation. Lead plaintiffs, Arkansas Public Employees Retirement System and IBEW Local 58/NECA Funds, seek class action status on behalf of our shareholders, alleging violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against the Company, our former chief executive officer, our current and former chief financial officers, and our former chief accounting officer, arising out of the restatement of our 2013 annual financial statements, and seek undisclosed damages. The case is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Master File No. 14-cv-01287. We filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint for failure to plead particularized facts supporting a strong inference of scienter on the part of the individual defendants and the motion was denied on September 3, 2015. We intend to continue to vigorously defend against these claims. Discovery in the case has begun and is expected to continue through 2016. At this time,

26



we expect legal fees incurred in defending this claim to reach or exceed the retention amount of our directors & officers liability insurance policy beyond which such costs should be recoverable from insurers and we believe the likelihood that we would incur a loss related to this matter in excess of the amounts we have accrued is remote. Legal fees to date have been expensed as incurred.

Butorin v. Blount et al, is a shareholder derivative complaint, filed on May 27, 2014 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas on behalf of the Company naming certain current and former members of the Company's board of directors as defendants and the Company as a nominal defendant. The complaint alleges that the named directors breached their fiduciary duties by permitting the Company's internal controls to be inadequate. On March 31, 2015, the District Court transferred the case to the U.S. District Court of Delaware. The court has lifted the stay and KBR plans to file a motion to dismiss the case. At this time, we are not yet able to determine the likelihood of loss, if any, arising from this matter.
Stella Dupree and Donald Taylor v. KBR, Inc., was filed by shareholders of the Company on May 12, 2015 in Delaware Chancery Court seeking the right to inspect and make copies of certain books and records of the Company under §220 of Delaware General Corporation Law relating primarily to the restatement of our 2013 annual financial statements. The remaining plaintiff voluntarily dismissed this case on February 26, 2016 following receipt of a limited set of documents from the Company. This matter is now resolved.
We have also received requests for information and a subpoena for documents from the Securities Exchange Commission ("SEC") regarding the restatement of our 2013 annual financial statements. We have been and intend to continue cooperating with the SEC.

PEMEX and PEP Arbitration

In 1997, Commisa, a subsidiary of KBR, Inc., entered into a contract with PEP, a subsidiary of PEMEX, the Mexican national oil company, to build offshore platforms and treatment and re-injection facilities in the Bay of Campeche, offshore Mexico. The project, known as EPC 1, encountered significant schedule delays and increased costs due to problems with design work, late delivery and defects in equipment, increases in scope and other changes.

PEP took possession of the facilities in March 2004 prior to the completion of our scope of work and without paying us for our work. We filed for arbitration with the International Chamber of Commerce ("ICC") in 2004 claiming recovery of damages of approximately $323 million. PEP subsequently filed counterclaims totaling $157 million. In December 2009, the ICC arbitration panel ruled in our favor, and we were awarded a total of approximately $351 million including legal and administrative recovery fees as well as interest. PEP was awarded approximately $6 million on counterclaims, plus interest on a portion of that sum. In connection with this award, we recognized a gain of $117 million net of tax in 2009.

U.S. Proceedings. Collection efforts have involved multiple actions. On August 27, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York entered an order stating it would confirm the award even though it had been annulled in Mexico (see Mexico proceedings discussion below). The judgment included reimbursement for sums Commisa was forced to pay from our performance bonds that PEP had previously called (see Performance Bonds discussion below). PEP filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on October 16, 2013 and posted $465 million cash as security for the judgment pending appeal. Oral arguments on the appeal was held on November 20, 2014. The U.S. government was invited to file a brief and did so, and the parties have filed responses to the U.S. government's brief. We continue to await the Court's ruling on the matter. There has been no indication as to when a decision will be reached and we are not aware of any factors preventing a decision from being reached. PEP could seek rehearing at the court of appeals and a review by the U.S. Supreme Court. At this time, we are unable to predict the timing of any ruling or resolution concerning this matter.

Mexico Proceedings. PEP's initial multiple attempts to nullify the award in Mexico were rejected by the Mexican courts. However, in September 2011, the Collegiate Court ruled that PEP, by administratively rescinding the contract in 2004, deprived the arbitration panel of jurisdiction and the award was null and void. PEP continues to litigate in Mexico. After Mexican courts ruled that they had no jurisdiction to hear further litigation, PEP obtained an amparo from a Mexican court stating that PEP’s rights had been denied when the other courts declined to take jurisdiction. Commisa has appealed the amparo.

Other Proceedings. Commisa also initiated collection proceedings in Luxembourg and sought to collect under the North American Free Trade Agreement, the latter of which has been denied pending collection efforts in the U.S. and in Luxembourg.


27



Performance Bonds

We had provided approximately $80 million in performance bonds to PEP when the project was awarded. The bonds were written by a Mexican bond company and backed by a U.S. insurance company which is indemnified by KBR. As a result of the ICC arbitration award in December 2009, the panel determined that KBR had performed on the project and recovery on the bonds by PEP was precluded.  Notwithstanding, PEP filed an action in Mexico in June 2010 against the Mexican bond company to collect the bonds. On June 17, 2013, after proceedings in multiple Mexican courts, we were required to pay $108 million to the Mexican bond company. The $108 million consists of the $80 million in outstanding bonds, plus $26 million in related interest and other expenses and $2 million in legal and banking fees. These sums were added to the judgment entered by the Federal Court in New York as discussed above.

Consistent with our treatment of probable claim recoveries, we have recorded $400 million of the ICC arbitration award, net of advances, in "claims and accounts receivable" on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. PEP has posted $465 million in cash collateral in the U.S. under the control of the Federal District Court in New York. In addition we have taken action to attach assets in Luxembourg as additional protection to collect on the ICC arbitration award. Although it is possible we could resolve and collect the amounts due from PEP in the next 12 months, we believe the timing of the collection of the award is uncertain; therefore, consistent with our prior practice, as of June 30, 2016, we continue to classify the amount recorded for financial reporting purposes due from PEP as long term.

Other Matters

The U.S. DOJ and the SEC are conducting investigations of news reports related to Unaoil, a Monaco based company, and activities Unaoil may have engaged in related to international projects involving several global companies, including KBR. We have been, and intend to continue, cooperating with the DOJ and the SEC in their investigations, which includes the voluntary submission of information and compliance with document requests, including a formal request from the SEC by subpoena.


28



Note 14. Shareholders’ Equity

The following tables summarize our activity in shareholders’ equity:
Dollars in millions
Total
 
PIC
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Treasury
Stock
 
AOCL
 
NCI
Balance at December 31, 2015
$
1,052

 
$
2,070

 
$
595

 
$
(769
)
 
$
(831
)
 
$
(13
)
Share-based compensation
10

 
10

 

 

 

 

Tax benefit increase related to share-based plans
1

 
1

 

 

 

 

Dividends declared to shareholders
(23
)
 


 
(23
)
 

 

 

Repurchases of common stock
(2
)
 

 

 
(2
)
 

 

Issuance of ESPP shares
1

 
(1
)
 

 
2

 

 

Distributions to noncontrolling interests
(9
)
 

 

 

 

 
(9
)
Net income
92

 

 
89

 

 

 
3

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
23

 

 

 

 
23

 

Balance at June 30, 2016
$
1,145

 
$
2,080

 
$
661

 
$
(769
)
 
$
(808
)
 
$
(19
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dollars in millions
Total
 
PIC
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Treasury
Stock
 
AOCL
 
NCI
Balance at December 31, 2014
$
935

 
$
2,091

 
$
439

 
$
(712
)
 
$
(876
)
 
$
(7
)
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest
(40
)
 
(40
)
 

 

 

 

Share-based compensation
10

 
10

 

 

 

 

Common stock issued upon exercise of stock options
1

 
1

 

 

 

 

Dividends declared to shareholders
(23
)
 

 
(23
)
 

 

 

Repurchases of common stock
(17
)
 

 

 
(17
)
 

 

Issuance of ESPP shares
2

 
(1
)
 

 
3

 

 

Distributions to noncontrolling interests
(12
)
 

 

 

 

 
(12
)
Net income
119

 

 
106

 

 

 
13

Other comprehensive income, net of tax
(39
)
 

 

 

 
(40
)
 
1

Balance at June 30, 2015
$
936

 
$
2,061

 
$
522

 
$
(726
)
 
$
(916
)
 
$
(5
)


Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax
 
June 30,
Dollars in millions
2016
 
2015
Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax of $1 and $5
$
(258
)
 
$
(265
)
Pension and post-retirement benefits, net of tax of $206 and $228
(548
)
 
(648
)
Fair value of derivatives, net of tax of $0 and $0
(2
)
 
(3
)
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss
$
(808
)
 
$
(916
)

29




Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, by component
Dollars in millions
Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments
 
Accumulated pension liability adjustments
 
Changes in fair value of derivatives
 
Total
Balance at December 31, 2015
$
(269
)
 
$
(560
)
 
$
(2
)
 
$
(831
)
Other comprehensive income adjustments before reclassifications
11

 

 

 
11

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income

 
12

 

 
12

Balance at June 30, 2016
$
(258
)
 
$
(548
)
 
$
(2
)
 
$
(808
)

Dollars in millions
Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments
 
Accumulated pension liability adjustments
 
Changes in fair value of derivatives
 
Total
Balance at December 31, 2014
$
(203
)
 
$
(670
)
 
$
(3
)
 
$
(876
)
Other comprehensive income adjustments before reclassifications
(62
)
 

 

 
(62
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income

 
22

 

 
22

Balance at June 30, 2015
$
(265
)
 
$
(648
)
 
$
(3
)
 
$
(916
)


Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, by component
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
Dollars in millions
2016
 
2015
 
Affected line item on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Accumulated pension liability adjustments
 
 
 
 
 
    Amortization of actuarial loss (a)
$
(15
)
 
$
(25
)
 
See (a) below
Tax benefit
3

 
3

 
Provision for income taxes
Net pension and post-retirement benefits
$
(12
)
 
$
(22
)
 
Net of tax
 
(a)
This item is included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. See Note 9 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

Note 15. Share Repurchases

Authorized Share Repurchase Program

On February 25, 2014, our Board of Directors authorized a plan to repurchase up to $350 million of our outstanding common shares, which replaced and terminated the August 26, 2011 share repurchase program. The authorization does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular number of common shares and may be commenced, suspended or discontinued without prior notice. The share repurchases are intended to be funded through the Company’s current and future cash and the authorization does not have an expiration date.


30



Share Maintenance Programs

Stock options and restricted stock awards granted under the KBR Stock and Incentive Plan may be satisfied using shares of our authorized but unissued common stock or our treasury share account.

The Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") allows eligible employees to withhold up to 10% of their earnings, subject to some limitations, to purchase shares of KBR common stock. These shares are issued from our treasury share account.

Withheld to Cover Program

In addition to the plans above, we also have in place a "withheld to cover" program, which allows us to withhold ordinary shares from employees in connection with the settlement of income tax and related benefit withholding obligations arising from the issuance of share based equity awards under the KBR Stock and Incentive Plan.

The table below presents information on our share repurchases activity under these programs:
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30, 2016
 
June 30, 2016
 
Number of Shares
 
Average Price per Share
 
Dollars in Millions
 
Number of Shares
 
Average Price per Share
 
Dollars in Millions
Repurchases under the $350 million authorized share repurchase program

 
n/a

 
$

 

 
n/a

 
$

Repurchases under the existing share maintenance programs

 
n/a

 

 

 
n/a

 

Withheld to cover shares
27,509

 
14.84

 

 
145,545

 
14.00

 
2

Total
27,509

 
$
14.84

 
$

 
145,545

 
$
14.00

 
$
2

 
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30, 2015
 
June 30, 2015
 
Number of Shares
 
Average Price per Share
 
Dollars in Millions
 
Number of Shares
 
Average Price per Share
 
Dollars in Millions
Repurchases under the $350 million authorized share repurchase program

 
n/a

 
$

 
496,440

 
$
15.12

 
$
7

Repurchases under the existing share maintenance programs
107,592

 
$
15.26

 
2

 
466,974

 
15.44

 
7

Withheld to cover shares
47,130

 
18.20

 
1

 
155,406

 
16.91

 
3

Total
154,722

 
$
16.16