Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K/A

(Amendment No. 1)

(Mark One)

For the Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2016

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number: 001-07731

EMERSON RADIO CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (973) 428-2000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    ¨  YES    x  NO.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act).    ¨  YES    x  NO.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days.    x  YES    ¨  NO.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that registrant was required to submit and post such files.)    x  YES    ¨  NO

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “larger accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    ¨  YES    x  NO.

Aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant at September 30, 2015 (computed by reference to the last reported sale price of the Common Stock on the NYSE MKT on such date): $14,501,590.

Number of Common Shares outstanding at July 29, 2016: 27,129,832

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

None

Table of Contents

EXPLANATORY NOTE

Unless the context otherwise requires, the term “the Company” and “Emerson,” refers to Emerson Radio Corp. and its subsidiaries.

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (the “Form 10-K/A”) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”) of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 (“Fiscal 2016”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on June 29, 2016, is filed solely for the purpose of including information that was to be incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Company will not file its proxy statement for its annual meeting of stockholders within 120 days of its fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, and is therefore amending and restating in their entirety Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of the Annual Report. In addition, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act, the Company is including with this Form 10-K/A certain currently dated certifications. Except as described above, no other amendments are being made to the Annual Report. This Form 10-K/A does not reflect events occurring after the filing of the Annual Report on June 29, 2016 or modify or update the disclosure contained in the Annual Report in any way other than as required to reflect the amendments discussed above and reflected below.

2

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

3

Table of Contents

PART III

ITEM 10 — DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the current directors of Emerson Radio Corp. (“Emerson,” “us” or the “Company”) as of July 29, 2016.

4

Table of Contents

Board of Directors and Committees

The Company’s Board presently consists of five directors. The Board has determined that two of the five current directors, Messrs. Sethi and Yuen, meet the definition of independence as established by the NYSE MKT listing rules.

The Board presently has one standing committee, the Audit Committee, which is a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10A-3 thereunder.

The Company’s Audit Committee currently consists of Mr. Sethi (Chairman) and Mr. Yuen, each of whom the Board has determined meets the definition of independence as established by the NYSE MKT listing rules and SEC rules. Mr. Sethi is currently the Chairman of the Audit Committee and the “audit committee financial expert.” Pursuant to Section 803(B)(2)(c) of the NYSE MKT Company Guide (the “Company Guide”), as a smaller reporting company the Company is required to have an audit committee of at least two independent members, as defined by the listing standards of the NYSE MKT.

5

Table of Contents

The Audit Committee is empowered by the Board, among other things, to: (i) serve as an independent and objective party to monitor the Company’s financial reporting process, internal control system and disclosure control system; (ii) review and appraise the audit efforts of the Company’s independent accountants; (iii) assume direct responsibility for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the independent accountants and for the resolution of disputes between the independent accountants and the Company’s management regarding financial reporting issues; and (iv) provide the opportunity for direct communication among the independent accountants, financial and senior management and the Board. During Fiscal 2016, the Audit Committee performed its duties under a written charter approved by the Board and formally met four times. A copy of the Company’s Audit Committee Charter is posted on the Company’s website: www.emersonradio.com on the Investor Relations page.

In addition, in March 2013, the Company formed an ad hoc Special Committee consisting solely of independent directors to evaluate possible strategic alternatives intended to enhance stockholder value. The Special Committee currently consists of Messrs. Sethi (Chairman) and Yuen.

Controlled Company

The Company does not maintain a nominating committee or a compensation committee. So long as Grande beneficially owns more than 50% of the outstanding common stock of Emerson, Emerson is a “controlled company” as defined in Section 801(a) of the NYSE MKT Company Guide. Accordingly, the Company relies on exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements to have (i) a majority of independent directors, (ii) a nominating and corporate governance committee composed entirely of independent directors or (iii) a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors. The full Board of Directors, among other things, (i) identifies individuals qualified to become members of the Board of Directors and selects director nominees for election at the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders, (ii) reviews and monitors matters related to management development and succession, (iii) develops and implements executive compensation policies and pay for performance criteria, and (iv) reviews and approves salaries, bonuses and incentive awards.

Director Qualifications

The Board believes that the Company and its stockholders are best served by having leadership personnel from the Company’s principal stockholder and individuals who have extensive experience in the Company’s industry and knowledge of the Company’s competitive landscape serve on its Board. The Board also believes that the backgrounds and qualifications of its directors, considered as a group, should provide a composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities. Please refer to the biographies of each of the Company’s directors for a discussion of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion that each individual should serve as a director.

No material changes have been made to the procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to the Board.

Codes of Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers (“Code of Ethics”) that applies to its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Controller and Treasurer. This Code of Ethics was established with the intention of focusing Senior Financial Officers on areas of ethical risk, providing guidance to help them recognize and deal with ethical issues, providing mechanisms to report unethical conduct, fostering a culture of honesty and accountability, deterring wrongdoing and promoting fair and accurate disclosure and financial reporting.

The Company has also adopted a Code of Conduct for Officers, Directors and Employees of Emerson Radio Corp. and its Subsidiaries (“Code of Conduct”). We prepared this Code of Conduct to help all officers, directors and employees understand and comply with the Company’s policies and procedures. Overall, the purpose of the Company’s Code of Conduct is to deter wrongdoing and promote (i) honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships; (ii) full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Company files with, or submits to, the SEC and in other public communications made by the Company; (iii) compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations; (iv) prompt internal reporting of code violations to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code of Conduct; and (v) accountability for adherence to the Code of Conduct.

The Code of Ethics and the Code of Conduct are posted on the Company’s website: www.emersonradio.com on the Investor Relations page. If the Company makes any substantive amendments to, or grants any waiver (including any implicit waiver) from a provision of the Code of Ethics or the Code of Conduct, and that relates to any element of the Code of Ethics definition enumerated in Item 406 (b) of Regulation S-K, the Company will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on its website or in a current report on Form 8-K.

6

Table of Contents

Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the executive officers of Emerson as of July 29, 2016:

Duncan Hon has served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer since August 2011 and a director of the Company since February 2009. Until his appointment as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Hon served as the Company’s Deputy Chief Executive Officer since November 2009. See Mr. Hon’s biographical information above.

Andrew L. Davis has served as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since September 2010 and served as Secretary of the Company from 2007 to 2016. Previously, from August 2007 to September 2010, Mr. Davis served as Vice President, Finance and Corporate Controller of the Company. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Davis held various executive and managerial positions in accounting and finance with several companies, most recently CA, Inc., and prior to that, ce Global Sourcing AG. Mr. Davis is a C.P.A., holds a B.B.A. in Accounting from Iowa State University and an M.B.A. from the University of Connecticut.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors, officers, and stockholders who beneficially own more than 10% of any class of its equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with respect to the Company’s equity securities with the SEC and the NYSE MKT. All reporting persons are required to furnish the Company with copies of all reports that such reporting persons file with the SEC pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments to these forms furnished to the Company, and Forms 5, along with amendments thereto, all parties subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) timely filed all such required reports during and with respect to Fiscal 2016.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

On March 25, 2013, The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (“HKEX”) published a news release announcing the censure of Grande and certain of its then-existing and former directors, including Messrs. Ho and Binney, by the Listing Appeals Committee of the HKEX. The censure was related to Grande’s breach of certain disclosure obligations pursuant to Rule 13.09(1) of the HKEX listing rules in 2007-2008 regarding Grande’s 2007 financial performance and the directors for their breach of the director’s undertaking under the HKEX listing rules to use best endeavors to procure Grande’s compliance with Rule 13.09(1). The HKEX required Mr. Ho to undergo training on listing rules compliance, which training requirement was completed in June 2013. Mr. Binney was also directed to attend training on listing rules compliance as a prerequisite to any future appointment as a director of an HKEX-listed company.

7

Table of Contents

ITEM 11 — EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following Summary Compensation Table sets forth information concerning compensation for services rendered in all capacities to the Company and its subsidiaries for Fiscal 2016 and for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 (“Fiscal 2015”) which was awarded to, earned by or paid to the Company’s named executive officers at any time during Fiscal 2016.

Employment Agreements.

During Fiscal 2016, the Company had employment agreements with certain of its named executive officers, each of which is described below.

Duncan Hon. Duncan Hon, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, entered into an employment agreement, effective April 1, 2011, with a wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary of the Company. Such agreement replaced his prior terminated agreements with the Company and sets forth the terms and conditions pursuant to which Mr. Hon would serve as the Company’s Deputy Chief Executive Officer and, subsequently, as Chief Executive Officer. The agreement provides for an annual base salary of 2,925,000 Hong Kong Dollars (“HKD”) and an annual discretionary bonus payable at any time as recommended by the Board. The contract extends until the earlier of the retirement of Mr. Hon on the first day of the following month immediately after his 60^th birthday, or the termination of the agreement by either the Company or Mr. Hon upon the delivery from one to the other of one month prior written notice. In November 2011, the Board approved an increase to Mr. Hon’s base annual salary to $475,000 effective August 31, 2011.

Andrew L. Davis. Andrew L. Davis, the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, entered into an employment agreement with the Company on August 1, 2007, which provided that Mr. Davis shall serve as the Company’s Vice President Finance and Corporate Controller. The employment agreement was further amended on March 5, 2015. The agreement, as amended, provides for, among other things, (i) an increase in Mr. Davis’s annual base salary from $317,625.00 to $333,506.25; (ii) a retention bonus in the aggregate amount of $166,753.00 (less applicable withholdings and deductions), which shall be payable in three (3) installments as follows: (a) $41,688.25 (less applicable withholdings and deductions) on March 31, 2015; (b) $41,688.25 (less applicable withholdings and deductions) on June 30, 2015; and (c) $83,376.50 (less applicable withholdings and deductions) on August 31, 2015, subject, in each case, to Mr. Davis’s continued employment on the applicable payment date, Mr. Davis having been terminated other than for cause or due to death or disability prior to the applicable payment date or Mr. Davis having resigned for good reason prior to the applicable payment date and (iii) in the event of a termination of his employment other than for cause or due to death or disability or a resignation for good reason, continuation of his base salary, at the rate then in effect, for a period of six months, payable in accordance with the Company’s customary payroll practices and procedures, subject to a customary release agreement.

Under Mr. Davis’s employment agreement, as amended, the terms below are generally defined as follows:

“cause” means Mr. Davis’s (i) material default or other material breach of his obligations under the agreement, subject to notice requirements and cure periods as set forth in the agreement; (ii) willful failure to perform material duties under the agreement that are reasonably assigned to him by the Company, subject to notice requirements and cure periods as set forth in the agreement; (iii) gross negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of his duties under the agreement, subject to notice requirements and cure periods as set forth in the agreement; or (iv) dishonesty, insubordination, or other willful act detrimental to the Company or its good will or damaging to its relationships with its customers, investors, suppliers, or employees, including, without limitation, (A) use of alcohol or illegal drugs such as to interfere with the performance of his obligations under the agreement , (B) conviction of or plea of guilty or no contest to a felony or any crime involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, or theft, and (C) material failure to comply with applicable laws or governmental regulations with respect to Company operations or the performance of his duties; provided however that no act or failure to act, on the part of Mr. Davis, shall constitute “cause” unless it is done, or omitted to be done, by Mr. Davis in bad faith or without Mr. Davis’s reasonable belief that his action or omission was (i) in the best interest of the Company, (ii) necessary to preserve the Company’s or Mr. Davis’s own reputation and/or (iii) required to comply with applicable laws, rule or regulations; and

8

Table of Contents

“good reason” means that Mr. Davis has complied with the appropriate notice procedures following the occurrence of any of the following without the executive’s prior written consent: (i) a reduction in Mr. Davis’s base salary; (ii) a material diminution in Mr. Davis’s position (other than temporarily due to illness or injury or as required by applicable law); (iii) a material breach of the Company’s payment obligations to Mr. Davis; or (iv) Mr. Davis is directed by the Company to engage in conduct that he reasonably believes is unlawful, unethical or immoral; provided, that, in each case, the Company has failed to cure such occurrence within 30 days after receipt of the appropriate notice from Mr. Davis.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

None of the Company’s named executive officers held any outstanding equity awards at March 31, 2016.

Compensation of Directors

During Fiscal 2016, the Company’s directors who were not employees were compensated for serving on the Board and on its various committees during the period. The Company does not compensate directors who are employees of the Company for their services as directors.

Outside Directors are each paid an annual director’s fee of $50,000. The Outside Director serving as the Chairman of the Board receives an additional annual fee of $20,000. Each Outside Director serving on the audit committee of the Board receives an additional fee of $15,000 per annum with no additional fee for serving as chairman of the audit committee. During Fiscal 2016, the Outside Director serving as the Chairman of the special committee received an additional fee of $20,000 per month with the exception of November 2015, December 2015 and January 2016, during which the Chairman of the special committee received an additional fee of $12,500 per month. During Fiscal 2016, each Outside Director serving on the special committee of the Board received an additional fee of $12,500 per month. In June 2016, the fee structure for the special committee was changed such that each Outside Director serving on the special committee of the Board receives an additional fee of $5,000 per month with no additional fee for serving as chairman of the special committee. The Company does not pay any additional fees for attendance at meetings of the Board or the committees. Audit committee fees are paid in four equal quarterly installments per annum and special committee fees are paid in monthly installments. Audit committee and special committee fees are pro-rated in situations where an Outside Director serves less than a full one year or periodic term.

Additionally, the Company’s directors are reimbursed their expenses for attendance at meetings.

The following table provides certain information with respect to the compensation earned or paid to the Company’s Outside Directors during Fiscal 2016.

Director Compensation

9

Table of Contents

ITEM 12 — SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth, as of July 29, 2016, the beneficial ownership of (i) each current director; (ii) each of the Company’s named executive officers; (iii) the Company’s current directors and executive officers as a group; and (iv) each stockholder known by the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock. Common stock beneficially owned and percentage ownership as of July 29, 2016 was based on 27,129,832 shares outstanding. Except as otherwise noted, the address of each of the following beneficial owners is c/o Emerson Radio Corp., 3 University Plaza, suite 405, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The Company did not have any equity compensation plans in existence as of March 31, 2016.

10

Table of Contents

ITEM 13 — CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

From time to time, Emerson engages in business transactions with its controlling shareholder, The Grande Holdings Limited (“Grande”), and one or more of Grande’s direct and indirect subsidiaries. Set forth below is a summary of such transactions.

Controlling Shareholder

S&T International Distribution Limited (“S&T”), which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Grande N.A.K.S. Ltd., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Grande, collectively have the shared power to vote and direct the disposition of 15,243,283 shares, or approximately 56.2%, of the Company’s outstanding common stock. Accordingly, the Company is a “controlled company” as defined in Section 801(a) of the NYSE MKT Company Guide.

Related Party Transactions

Dividend-Related Issues with S&T

On March 2, 2010, the Board declared an extraordinary dividend of $1.10 per common share which was paid on March 24, 2010. In connection with the Company’s determination as to the taxability of the dividend, the Board relied upon information and research provided to it by the Company’s tax advisors and, in reliance on the “stock-for-debt” exception in the Internal Revenue Code Sections 108(e)(8) and (e)(10), concluded that 4.9% of such dividend paid was taxable to the recipients.

In August 2012, the Company received a Form 886-A from the IRS which challenges the Company’s conclusions and determined that the Company did not qualify for the above-referenced exception. Accordingly, the IRS concluded that 100% of the dividend paid was taxable to the recipients. The Company defended its position and calculations and contested the position asserted by the IRS. The Company prepared and, on October 25, 2012, delivered its rebuttal to the IRS contesting the IRS determination. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in defending its position (for a discussion of whether the relevant period of assessment has expired, see below).

In the event that the Company is not successful in establishing with the IRS that the Company’s calculations were correct, then the shareholders who received the dividend likely will be subject to and liable for an assessment of additional taxes due. Moreover, the Company may be contingently liable for taxes due by certain of its shareholders resulting from the dividend paid by the Company.

Initially, the Company withheld from the dividend paid to foreign shareholders an amount equal to the tax liability associated with such dividend. On April 7, 2010, upon a request made to the Company by its foreign controlling shareholder, S&T, the Company entered into an agreement with S&T (the “Agreement”), whereby the Company returned to S&T on April 7, 2010 that portion of the funds withheld for taxes from the dividend paid on March 24, 2010 to S&T, which the Company believed was not subject to U.S. tax based on the Company’s good-faith estimate of its accumulated earnings and profits at that time. The Agreement includes provisions pursuant to which S&T agreed to indemnify the Company for any liability imposed on it as a result of the Company’s agreement not to withhold such funds for S&T’s possible tax liability and a pledge of stock as collateral. The Company continues to assert that such dividend is largely not subject to U.S. tax based on the Company’s good-faith estimate of its accumulated earnings and profits. In addition, the Company also continues to assert that this transaction results in an off-balance sheet arrangement and a possible contingent tax liability of the Company, which, if recognized, would be offset by the calling by the Company on S&T of the indemnification provisions of the Agreement.

In February 2011, upon the request of S&T to the Company, the Company and S&T agreed that the collateral pledged as a part of the Agreement would no longer be required and such collateral was returned by the Company to S&T in March 2011 and the Agreement was amended and restated to remove the collateral requirement but retain the indemnification provisions. The Agreement, as amended (the “Amended Agreement”), remains in effect as of today.

In September 2014, the Company, with S&T’s consent, withheld $0.5 million in cash, to be pledged as collateral against the Amended Agreement, from the dividend paid to S&T on September 30, 2014 along with such dividend paid on that date to all common stockholders. The Company held, as of March 31, 2016, $0.5 million in cash collateral from S&T against the Amended Agreement. In the event that (i) the Company is not successful in establishing with the IRS that the Company’s calculations were correct and (ii) S&T is unable or unwilling to pay the additional taxes due or indemnify the Company under the terms of the Amended Agreement, the Company may be liable to pay such additional taxes, which, together with penalties and interest, are currently estimated by the Company to be approximately $5.0 million as of March 31, 2016 (the “Potential Tax Exposure Related to the March

11

Table of Contents

2010 Dividend”), $0.5 million of which was collateralized in cash held by the Company as of March 31, 2016 as described above and which was classified by the Company as restricted cash on its balance sheet. Any such liability, should it be required to be recognized by the Company, would likely have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations in the period recognized.

As of March 31, 2016, the Company believes that it is more likely than not that the assessment period for the Company for tax under section 1461 of the Internal Revenue Code in connection with the withholding tax requirements pertaining to the March 2, 2010 dividend has expired, such that if the IRS were to attempt to assess tax, the assessment would be time-barred. Thusly, as of March 31, 2016, the Company believes that it is more likely than not that it will not be liable for the Potential Tax Exposure Related to the March 2010 Dividend.

In April 2016, the Company, upon a request made by S&T, considered and agreed that the collateral pledged as a part of the Agreement would no longer be required and that such collateral would be returned by the Company to S&T, net of the $79,000 in expenses incurred by the Company in defending the IRS challenge with respect to the March 2, 2010 dividend. Thusly, on April 29, 2016, the Company paid $421,000 to S&T to effectuate the release of the collateral net of the aforementioned expenses incurred by the Company.

Indemnification of Officers and Directors

The Company enters into indemnification agreements with each of its directors and officers. These agreements require the Company to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to the Company, and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified. The Company also intends to enter into indemnification agreements with its future directors and officers.

Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Parties

It is the policy of the Company that any proposed transaction between the Company and related parties, as defined by the Financial Accounting Standard Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 850 (ASC 850) (“RPT Transactions”), with no minimum dollar amount threshold, must be presented to all, and approved by a majority of, those directors of the Company who are independent within the meaning of NYSE MKT Company Guide § 803(A)(2), as may be amended from time to time. In reviewing and approving proposed transactions between the Company and related parties, the independent directors are to determine whether the proposed transaction is entirely fair to the Company and in the Company’s best interest. For purposes of the policy, related parties are as defined within ASC 850, generally, but not limited, meaning (i) an officer or director of the Company or the member of the immediate family of any of them or (ii) any other corporation, partnership, association, limited liability company, limited liability partnership, trust or other entity or organization in which one or more of the Company’s officers or directors are (a) directors, officers, trustees or other fiduciaries or (b) have a financial interest.

Director Independence

The Company’s Board presently consists of five directors — Messrs. Ho, Hon, Binney, Sethi and Yuen. The Board has determined that two of the five current directors, Messrs. Sethi and Yuen, meet the definition of independence as established by the NYSE MKT listing standards and applicable SEC rules.

The Company’s Audit Committee currently consists of Messrs. Sethi (Chairman) and Yuen.

ITEM 14 — PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

In accordance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Audit Committee’s charter, all audit and audit-related work and all non-audit work performed by the Company’s independent accountants, MSPC Certified Public Accountants and Advisors, A Professional Corporation (“MSPC”), is approved in advance by the Audit Committee, including the proposed fees for such work. The Audit Committee is informed of each service actually rendered. All fees described below were approved by the Audit Committee for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

12

Table of Contents

PART IV.

ITEM 15 — Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(3) Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed with this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report.

13

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: July 29, 2016

14