ENDONOVO THERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 489-4774

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes [  ]   No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes [   ]   No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  

Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  

Yes [   ]   No [X]

The aggregate market value of the voting Common Stock held by non-affiliates, computed by reference to the price at which the voting Common Stock was sold as of the last business day of the Company’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter is $45,298,000.

As of March 24, 2016, the registrant had 108,026,664 shares of its common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:  None.

2

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 is being filed in conjunction with our decision to restate the audited financial statements contained in our report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “2015 10-K”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 5, 2016.

As disclosed in Item 9B in our Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2015, the Board of Directors authorized us to amend and restate our financial statements and other financial information for the year ended December 31, 2015 as a result of discovering the inadvertent omission of two consulting agreements entered into in November and December 2015 which contained promissory notes with conversion privileges based on an undeterminable number of common stock shares.

3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

4

PART II

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The information and financial data discussed below is derived from the audited financial statements of the Company for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.  The audited financial statements were prepared and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The information and financial data discussed below is only a summary and should be read in conjunction with the historical financial statements and related notes contained elsewhere in this 10-K. The financial statements contained elsewhere in this 10-K fully represent the Company’s financial condition and operations; however, they are not indicative of the Company’s future performance. Although management believes that the assumptions made and expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, there is no assurance that the underlying assumptions will, in fact, prove to be correct or that actual results will not be different from expectations expressed in this 10-K.

Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward Looking Statements

The information contained in Item 2 contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results may materially differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain risks and uncertainties set forth in this report. Although management believes that the assumptions made and expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, there is no assurance that the underlying assumptions will, in fact, prove to be correct or that actual results will not be different from expectations expressed in this report.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (U.S. GAAP). In doing so, we have to make estimates and assumptions that affect our reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, as well as related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. In some cases, we could reasonably have used different accounting policies and estimates. In some cases, changes in the accounting estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from our estimates. To the extent that there are material differences between these estimates and actual results, our financial condition or results of operations will be affected. We base our estimates on past experience and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, and we evaluate these estimates on

5

an ongoing basis. We refer to accounting estimates of this type as critical accounting policies and estimates, which we discuss further below.

Use of estimates

Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. The significant estimates were made for the fair value of common stock issued for services, with notes payable arrangements, in connection with note extension agreements, and as repayment for outstanding debt, in estimating the useful life used for depreciation and amortization of our long-lived assets, in the valuation of the derivative liability, and the valuation of deferred income tax assets. Actual results and outcomes may differ from management's estimates and assumptions.

Revenue recognition

The Company recognizes revenue from its technology licensing and commercialization activities in accordance with paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition.  The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned.

The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the services have been rendered to the customer and accepted by the customer as completed pursuant to Company’s Licensing Agreements, (iii) collectability is reasonably assured. The Company has yet to realize any revenues from its licensing agreements.  All of our revenues in the current year are from the sale of the TVEMF device for evaluation purposes.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

The Company is not aware of any recently issued accounting pronouncements that when adopted will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or result of its operations.

Results of Operations

Results of Operations Year Ended December 31, 2015 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2014

Revenues

Our net revenue was $4,265 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. Our net revenue was $24,192 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. We are in an early stage and our revenues will be small and erratic until a

6

device or biological license receives FDA approval or international research licensing develops.  The growth of our business is dependent on successfully raising additional capital to fund our growth.

Operating Expenses

Our operating expenses for 2015 were approximately $2,567,000 compared to $2,200,000 for 2014.  The operating expenses were comprised primarily of consulting and professional fees for the development of our intellectual property and expenses related to being a public company.

Depreciation

We incur depreciation expense for costs related to our assets, including our information technology and software.

Our depreciation decreased to $14,773 in 2015 from $15,737 in 2014. There were no significant equipment purchases or sales during 2015.

Other Income (Expense)

Our Other Income (Expense) was expense of approximately $4,201,000 in 2015 compared to income of $1,232,000 in 2014. The expense in 2015 was primarily the result of changes in our financings to reflect liability accounting for convertible debt issued with variable conversion rates compared to income in 2014 when we had income related to extinguishment of debt.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since inception and through December 31, 2015, the Company has raised approximately $2.8 million in equity and debt transactions. These funds have been used to advance the operations of the Company, build its bio-medical platform, patent work & general corporate development. Our accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business for the twelve month period following the date of these

7

consolidated financial statements. However, the Company has incurred substantial losses.   Our current liabilities exceed our current assets and available cash is not sufficient to fund the expected future operation.  The Company is raising additional capital through debt and equity securities in order to continue the funding of its operations. However, there is no assurance that the Company can raise enough funds or generate sufficient revenues to pay its obligations as they become due, which raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. To reduce the risk of not being able to continue as a going concern, management has initiated a private placement offering to raise capital through the sale of its common stock and has engaged a broker/dealer to raise additional capital.  Although, uncertainty exists as to whether the Company will be able generate enough cash from operations to fund the Company’s working capital needs or raise sufficient capital to meet the Company’s obligations as they become due, no adjustments have been made to the carrying value of assets or liabilities as a result of this uncertainty.  Our cash on hand at December 31, 2015 was approximately $41,000.  This will not be sufficient to fund operations if additional capital is not raised.  The Company raised an aggregate of $678,750 through the sale of equity and debt securities since December 31, 2015 through the date of this report.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K, obligations under any guarantee contracts or contingent obligations. We also have no other commitments, other than the costs of being a public company and intellectual property development that will increase our operating costs or cash requirements in the future.

Seasonality

Management does not believe that our current business segment is seasonal to any material extent.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

We do not have in effect any compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance.  

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

During the quarter ended December 31, 2015, we issued the following unregistered equity securities:

The above issuances of were exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2), and/or Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act.  These securities qualified for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act since the issuance securities by us did not involve a public offering.  The offering was not a “public offering” as defined in Section 4(2) due to the insubstantial number of persons involved in the deal, size of the offering, manner of the offering and number of securities offered. We did not undertake an offering in which we sold a high number of securities to a high number of investors.  In addition, these stockholders had the necessary investment intent as required by Section 4(2) since they agreed to and received share certificates bearing a legend stating that such securities are restricted pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act.  This restriction ensures that these securities would not be immediately redistributed into the market and therefore not be part of a “public offering.” Based on an analysis of the above factors, we have met the requirements to qualify for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for this transaction.

8

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

9

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring net losses and has a working capital deficit at December 31, 2015. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 1. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Rose, Snyder & Jacobs LLP

Encino, California

April 1, 2016

(except for Note 2, as to which is dated May 11, 2016)

10

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of December 31,

11

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the Years Ended December 31,

12

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Deficit

For the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014

13

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Years Ended December 31,

14

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014

Note 1 - Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company” or “ETI”) is primarily focused in the business of biomedical research and development, particularly in regenerative medicine, which has included the development of the proprietary square wave form device. The Company has historically been involved with intellectual property licensing and commercialization. 

On January 22, 2014 Hanover Portfolio Acquisitions, Inc. (the "Company") received written consents in lieu of a meeting of stockholders from holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock representing in excess of 50% of the total issued and outstanding voting power of the Company approving an amendment to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation to change the name of the Company from “Hanover Portfolio Acquisitions, Inc.” to “Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc.”  The name change was affected pursuant to a Certificate of Amendment (the “Certificate of Amendment”), filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on January 24, 2014.

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of ETI, IP Resources International, Inc., Aviva Companies Corporation, and WeHealAnimals, Inc. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

Going Concern

These accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business for a period following the date of these consolidated financial statements.  The Company has recurring net losses and working capital deficits. The Company has raised approximately $1.3 million in debt and equity financing for the year ended December 31, 2015.  The Company is raising additional capital through debt and equity securities in order to continue the funding of its operations.  However, there is no assurance that the Company can raise enough funds or generate sufficient revenues to pay its obligations as they become due, which raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  No adjustments have been made to the carrying value of assets or liabilities as a result of this uncertainty. To reduce the risk of not being able to continue as a going concern, management initiated a private placement offering to raise capital through the sale of its common stock, has engaged a broker/dealer to raise additional capital and is seeking out profitable companies.  Although, uncertainty exists as to whether the Company will be able generate enough cash from operations to fund the Company’s working capital needs or raise sufficient capital to meet the Company’s obligations as they become due, no adjustments have been made to the carrying value of assets or liabilities as a result of this uncertainty.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Critical estimates include the value of shares issued for services, in connection with notes payable agreements, in connection with note extension agreements, and as repayment for outstanding debt,  the useful lives of property and equipment, the valuation of the derivative liability, and the valuation of deferred income tax assets. Management uses its historical records and knowledge of its business in making these estimates.  Actual results could differ from these estimates.

15

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Property plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost.  Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range between five and seven years.  Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue from its technology licensing and commercialization activities in accordance with paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition.  The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned.

The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the services have been rendered to the customer and accepted by the customer as completed, and (iii) collectability is reasonably assured.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company measures stock-based compensation cost at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and recognizes it as expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the vesting or service period, as applicable, of the stock award using the straight-line method. When our common stock is thinly traded, we have made estimates of the fair value of the common stock based not only on market prices but other factors such as financial condition and results of operations.

Income Taxes

The Company records a tax provision for the anticipated tax consequences of its reported results of operations. The provision for income taxes is computed using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for operating losses and income tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted tax rates that apply to taxable income in effect for the years in which those tax assets are expected to be realized or settled. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.

The Company has adopted ASC Topic 740, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements. ASC Topic 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, and also provides guidance on derecognition of tax benefits, classification on the balance sheet, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company has determined that the adoption did not result in the recognition of any liability for unrecognized tax benefits and that there are no unrecognized tax benefits that would, if recognized, affect the Company’s effective tax rate.  

16

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Net Income (Loss) per Share

Basic net income (loss) per share is calculated based on the net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period excluding any dilutive effects of options, warrants, unvested share awards and convertible securities. Diluted net income (loss) per common share assumes the conversion of all dilutive securities using the if-converted method, and assumes the exercise or vesting of other dilutive securities, such as options, warrants and restricted stock using the treasury stock method, when dilutive. For the year ended December 31, 2014 the Company did not have dilutive securities.  For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company had 1,706,390 of weighted-average common shares relating to the convertible debt, under the if-converted method, however, these shares are not dilutive because the Company recorded a loss during the fiscal year.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2014 financial statements in order for them to conform to the 2015 presentation.  Such reclassifications have no impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Accounting guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities using a hierarchy system, and defines required disclosures. It clarifies that fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the reporting entity transacts business.

The Company's balance sheet contains derivative and warrant liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value is as follows:

Level 1: uses quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: uses observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: uses unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

The fair value of the Company’s recorded derivative liability is determined based on unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data, which require a Level 3 classification. A  Black-Sholes  option valuation model was used to determine the fair value. The Company records derivative liability on the condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of operation.

The following table presents changes in the liabilities with significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the year ended December 31, 2015:

17

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

The following table presents changes in the liabilities with significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the year ended December 31, 2015:

Derivative Liability

The Company issued twelve Variable Debentures during the year ended December 31, 2015, which contained variable conversion rates based on unknown future prices of the Company’s common stock.  This resulted in a derivative liability.  The Company measures the derivative liability using the Black-Scholes option valuation model using the following assumptions:

18

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

The assumptions used in determining fair value represent management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if factors change, including changes in the market value of the Company’s common stock, managements’ assessment or significant fluctuations in the volatility of the trading market for the Company’s common stock, the Company’s fair value estimates could be materially different in the future.

The Company computes the fair value of the derivative liability at each reporting period and the change in the fair value is recorded as non-cash expense or non-cash income. The key component in the value of the derivative liability is the Company’s stock price, which is subject to significant fluctuation and is not under its control, and the assessment of volatility. The resulting effect on net loss is therefore subject to significant fluctuation and will continue to be so until the Company’s Variable Debentures, which the convertible feature is associated with, are converted into common stock or paid in full with cash. Assuming all other fair value inputs remain constant, the Company will record non-cash expense when its stock price increases and non-cash income when its stock price decreases.

Recent Accounting Standard Updates

In August 2014, the FASB issued FASB ASU2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. FASB ASU 2014-15 changes to the disclosure of uncertainties about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. These changes require an entity’s management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that financial statements are issued. Substantial doubt is defined as an indication that it is probable that an entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that financial statements are issued. If management has concluded that substantial doubt exists, then the following disclosures should be made in the financial statements: (i) principal conditions or events that raised the substantial doubt, (ii) management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations, (iii) management’s plans that alleviated the initial substantial doubt or, if substantial doubt was not alleviated, management’s plans that are intended to at least mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt, and (iv) if the latter in (iii) is disclosed, an explicit statement that there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. These changes become effective for the Company for the 2016 annual period. Management is evaluating the impact of the adoption of these changes will have on the consolidated financial statements. Subsequent to adoption, this guidance will need to be applied by management at the end of each annual period and interim period therein to determine what, if any, impact there will be on the consolidated financial statements in a given reporting period.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No 2015-3, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. This update changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in the balance sheet. ASU 2015-03 requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt obligation to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability rather than being presented as an asset. Amortization of debt issuance costs will continue to be reported as interest expense. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, “Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements”. This ASU clarified guidance in ASC 2015-03 stating that the SEC staff would not object to a company presenting debt issuance costs related to a line-of-credit arrangement on the balance sheet as a deferred asset, regardless of whether there were any outstanding borrowings at period-end. This update is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015, which will require us to adopt these provisions in the first quarter of 2016. This update will be applied on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each period presented will be adjusted to reflect the effects of applying the new guidance. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

19

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740). The amendments in ASU 2015-17 change the requirements for the classification of deferred taxes on the balance sheet. Currently, GAAP requires an entity to separate deferred income tax liabilities and assets into current and noncurrent amounts in a classified statement of financial position. To simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes, the amendments in this ASU require that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The pronouncement is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Earlier application is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company has early adopted this pronouncement for the fiscal reporting period ended December 31, 2015, and has reclassified the presentation of deferred income taxes in the prior period to conform with the current year classification in the consolidated balance sheets. As a result of the Company having recognized a valuation reserve for the entire deferred tax liability balance at December 31, 2014 and 2015, there is no impact of the presentation of deferred income taxes in our financial statements.

In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The update intends to enhance the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information and addresses certain aspects of the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The new standard affects all entities that hold financial assets or owe financial liabilities. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is evaluating the impact of the adoption of these changes will have on the consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which supersedes existing guidance on accounting for leases in "Leases (Topic 840)" and generally requires all leases to be recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018; early adoption is permitted. The provisions of ASU 2016-02 are to be applied using a modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

Note 2 – Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements

The Company subsequently discovered an inadvertent omission of two consulting agreements entered into in November and December 2015 which contained promissory notes with conversion privileges based on an undeterminable number of common stock shares as payment for services under the agreements.  These financial statements and notes have been updated to properly reflect these transactions.

The following tables present a summary of the effects of the restatement adjustments on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2015 and the consolidated statement of operations and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2015:

20

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

21

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 3 - License Agreements

CPAIR, Inc.

Effective November 11, 2011, IPR entered into an Exclusive License Agreement with CPAIR, Inc. (“CPaiR”) to acquire the rights to market and distribute certain intellectual property on a worldwide basis except for the United States.  The terms of the license agreement shall be for the greater of the life of the provisional patents, for the technology, or twenty-one years.  The term shall automatically renew for an additional one year term unless either party notifies the other that it does not desire to renew the license agreement ninety days before the then-current term of the license agreement expires.  Under the Exclusive License Agreement, if IPR enters into a sublicense agreement, IPR is required to pay CPaiR 20% of royalties received by IPR. If IPR elects to distribute the product, without sublicenses, then CPaiR receives 10% of gross revenues. Also, IPR is required to pay to CPaiR 20% of any upfront license fee actually received by IPR in connection with the CPaiR intellectual property and 20% of the quarterly revenue actually received by IPR in connection with such intellectual property.  If IPR does not pay a minimum of $1,000,000 to CPaiR within a period of three years from the Effective date, the license agreement will terminate. IPR has the right to pay the difference between the amounts paid by IPR and the minimum payment of $1,000,000. Under the terms of the agreement, IPR was not required to pay an upfront license fee.

American Cryostem Corp.

either party notifies the other that it does not desire to renew the License Agreement. Under the License Agreement, any distributer or sub-licensee, engaged by IPR, must pay 25% of its quarterly gross revenue which shall be split 50/50 between IPR and ACSC. In the event that IPR receives any upfront license fee from a sub-licensee, IPR is required to pay to ACSC 50% of that upfront license fee. Under the terms of the agreement, IPR was not required to pay an upfront license fee.

Note 4 - Property and Equipment

The following is a summary of equipment, at cost, less accumulated depreciation at December 31, 2015 and 2014:

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $14,773 and $15,737, respectively. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred while improvements are capitalized. Upon the sale, retirement or disposal of fixed assets, the accounts are relieved of the cost and the related accumulated depreciation with any gain or loss recorded to the consolidated statements of operations.

22

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 5 - Notes payable and Long Term Loan

Notes Payable

In October 2013, the Company initiated a private placement for up to $500,000 of financing by the issuance of notes payable at a minimum of $25,000, one unit. The notes bear interest at 10% per annum and are due and payable with accrued interest one year from issuance.  Also, the Company agreed to issue 125,000 shares of its common stock for each unit. In July 2014, the Company initiated a private placement for up to $500,000 of financing by the issuance of notes payable at a minimum of $25,000, one unit. The notes bear interest at 10% per annum and are due and payable with accrued interest one year from issuance.  Also, the Company agreed to issue 50,000 shares of its common stock for each unit. In October 2014, the Company initiated a private placement for up to $500,000 of financing by the issuance of notes payable at a minimum of $25,000, one unit. The notes bear interest at 10% per annum and are due and payable with accrued interest one year from issuance.  Also, the Company agreed to issue 50,000 shares of its common stock for each unit.   In August 2015, the Company initiated a private placement for up to $500,000 of financing by the issuance of notes payable at a minimum of $25,000, one unit. The notes bear interest at 10% per annum and are due and payable with accrued interest one year from issuance.  Also, the Company agreed to issue 100,000 shares of its common stock for each unit.  At issuance of each private placement note payable agreement, the Company records a discount at the greater of the principal balance of the note payable or the fair value of the common stock issued in connection with the note. The discount is amortized over the life of each note, one year. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company has issued promissory notes for an aggregate principal of approximately $615,000 under these private placements, and recorded discounts amounting to $223,551 in connection with these. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued promissory notes for an aggregate principal of approximately $753,000, and recorded discounts amounting to $6,976 in connection with these. As of December 31, 2015, notes payable outstanding under these private placements are $1,688,750.

As of December 31, 2015, the Company had notes payable to related parties amounting to$245,000. Refer to Note 7 – Related Party Transactions.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued twelve Convertible Debentures (“Variable Debentures”) for $921,250 with original terms of 9 months to three years and interest rates ranging from 0% to 10% which contain variable conversion rates with a discount of ranging from 25% to 53% of the Company’s common stock based on the terms included in the Variable Debentures.  Certain of the Variable Debentures contain prepayment options which enable the Company to prepay the notes for periods of 0-180 days subsequent to issuance at premiums ranging from 120% to145%.  The Company recorded a derivative liability as a result of the conversion feature. The derivative liability was allocated between a note discount, up to the value of the Variable Debenture, and interest expense for the excess, and the note discount is being amortized over the life of the Variable Debenture. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded $859,071 in discounts on these Variable Debentures. As of December 31, 2015, ten of these Variable Debentures are outstanding, with a gross amount of $783,250.

During July 2015, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the holder of a $100,000 Variable Debenture wherein the Note was exchanged for 900,000 shares of common stock, with the restriction that the shares may be sold from time to time at various prices of $0.60 and above. During December 2015, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the holder of a $38,000 Variable Debenture wherein the Company repaid in full the Note balance with a cash payment of $56,590. In accordance with ASC 470-50, Debt Modifications and Extinguishments, the Company recognized a $127,674 net loss on extinguishment of debt in connection with these settlement agreements.

23

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Long Term Loan

The Company has financed the purchase of an automobile.  The maturity dates on the loan are as follows:

Acquisition Payable

In connection with the Company’s acquisition of IPR in 2012, IPR recorded a $155,000 long-term acquisition payable for costs that were not paid at closing. These payable is non-interest bearing and IPR agreed to make payments up to 25% of the proceeds from any private placement or gross profits earned by IPR until the obligation is satisfied. The percentage of the proceeds to be paid is at the sole discretion of IPR’s Chief Executive Officer and the ex-Chief Executive Officer of the Company based on the liquidity of the Company.

24

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Effective Interest Rate

During the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company’s effective interest rate was 95% and 11%, respectively.

Note 6 - Shareholders’ Deficit

Reverse Spilt

On April 28, 2014, we concluded the process of changing our corporate name to Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and began trading under the symbol ENDV.  The Company enacted a reverse stock split effective May 15, 2014.  All share and per share numbers in this report have been adjusted for the reverse stock split.

Common Stock

The Company has entered into consulting agreements with various consultants for service to be provided to the Company. The agreements stipulate a monthly fee and a certain number of shares that the consultant vests in over the term of the contract. The consultant is issued a prorated number of shares of common stock at the beginning of the contract, which the consultant earns over a three-month period. At the anniversary of each quarter, the consultant is issued a new allotment of common stock. In accordance with ASC 505-50 – Equity-Based Payment to

non-Employees, the common stock shares issued to the consultant are valued upon their vesting, with interim estimates of value as appropriate during the vesting period.

During 2014 and the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company revalued the shares based on low trading volume to $0.001.  The fair value of stock issued for services and as for non-cash consideration starting on July 1, 2015 was based on the market price of the stock on the date of grant since significant trading started at that time.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company granted 6,519,286 shares for services performed by consultants and recorded expense of $728,750.  

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued 1,855,000 shares of common stock to the purchasers of notes.  The share issuance was valued at $223,551.  The fair value of stock issued to the purchasers of

notes starting on July 1, 2015 was based on the market price of the stock on the date of grant since significant trading started at that time.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued 800,000 shares of its common stock at a fair value of $61,750 on the extension of notes payable.  The fair value of stock issued on the extension of notes starting on July 1, 2015 was based on the market price of the stock on the date of grant since significant trading started at that time.

In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued 13,450,592 shares of common stock on the conversion of notes in an amount of $491,915 and accrued interest of $52,623.

The Variable Debentures issued by the Company each have a provision requiring the Company to reserve a variable amount of shares of common stock for when the holder of the Variable Debenture converts.  As of December 31, 2015, the Company has reserved 7,527,853 of common shares related to the outstanding debentures.

On January 15, 2015 the Company entered into an Equity Purchase Agreement (the “EPA” with Kodiak Capital Group. LLC (“KCG”) and, pursuant thereto caused a registration statement on Form S-1 to become effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  To date the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock to KCG and has received $81,738 in connection with KCG’s sale of approximately 98,750 shares of common stock under the EPA.  The Company has demanded (among other things) (i) an accounting of shares sold by KCG under the EPA, (ii) a return of 1,901,250 shares that KCG holds against possible future put notices to its transfer agent for

25

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

cancellation as the Company does not anticipate future put notices; and (iii) return of the 215,000 shares KCG received as a commitment fee for the EPA.  As of the date of this filing, KCG has not complied with any of these demands and has twice improperly sought to remove all transfer restrictions from the 215,000 shares, which have a minimum selling price of $0.50 per share until June 30, 2016.  KCG has sent written communications to the Company regarding the mechanisms and procedures for returning the 1,901,250 shares, but has not followed through.

As of December 31, 2014, the total stock awards granted were 15,292,574 shares with 3,253,264 shares vested and issued, 376,324 forfeited with the 11,662,986 shares unvested. The total expense recorded for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $2,991.  

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued an additional 26,064,490 shares of its common stock at a fair value of $26,064 for services rendered.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company had the following share issuances of its common stock at a current market value of $0.001 per share:

·  Sold 1,362,803 shares of its common stock for total consideration of $1,570. The Company has recorded the purchase price as a stock subscription receivable, which has been classified as stockholders equity as the Company has not received the consideration as of the issuance of these financial statements.

·  Converted $5,036 of its accounts payable into 5,036,453 shares of its common stock.

·  Converted $38,794 of accrued compensation into 38,793,547 shares of its common stock

Series AA Preferred Shares

On February 22, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended (the “Articles of Incorporation”), in the form of a Certificate of Designation that authorized the issuance of up to one million (1,000,000) shares of a new series of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share, designated “Series AA Super Voting Preferred Stock,” for which the board of directors established the rights, preferences and limitations thereof.  

Each holder of outstanding shares of Series AA Super Voting Preferred Stock shall be entitled to one hundred thousand (100,000) votes for each share of Series AA Super Voting Preferred Stock held on the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote at each meeting of stockholders of the Company.  As of December 31, 2015, there were 1,000 shares of Series AA Preferred stock outstanding.

Note 7 – Related Party Transactions

From time-to-time officers of the Company advance monies to the Company to cover costs.  During the year ended December 31, 2015, officers advanced $100,755 of funds to the Company of which $100,950 were repaid during the year. The balance of short-term advances due to two officers and executives of the Company at December 31, 2015 is $3,605.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, an officer and executive of the Company entered into a note payable agreement for $50,000, and the principal and interest of a $96,000 note payable to another related party was converted into 350,000 shares of common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2014, officers and executives of the Company entered into note payable agreements amounting to $195,000. The balance of notes payable from two officers and executives of the Company at December 31, 2015 is $245,000.

26

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 8 - Income taxes

The Company files income tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and various state jurisdictions. For jurisdictions in which tax filings are prepared, the Company is subject to income tax examinations by state tax authorities and federal tax authorities for all tax years.

The deferred tax assets are mainly comprised of net loss carryforwards. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had approximately $5,080,000 of federal net operating loss carryforwards, that it can use to offset a certain amount of taxable income in the future. These federal net operating loss carryforwards expire through 2035.  The resulting deferred tax asset is offset by a 100% valuation allowance due to the uncertainty of its realization.

A reconciliation of the provision for income tax expense with the expected income tax computed by applying the federal statutory income tax rate to income before provision for income taxes was as follows for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:

The primary difference between income tax expense attributable to continuing operations and the amount of income tax expense that would result from applying domestic federal statutory rates to income before provision for income taxes relates to the change in the valuation allowance.

The Company has adopted the accounting standards that clarify the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold of more likely than not and a measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.  In making this assessment, a company must determine whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, based solely on the technical merits of the position and must assume that the tax position will be examined by taxing authorities. Our policy is to include interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. Interest and penalties totaled $0 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

Note 9 - Commitments and Contingencies

Legal matters

The Company may become involved in various legal proceedings in the normal course of business.

Note 10 - Subsequent Events.

Subsequent to December 31, 2015, an aggregate of 901,504 shares of restricted common stock were issued as compensation to independent contractors.

Subsequent to December 31, 2015, the Company issued $302,500 in Convertible with 300,000 warrants

27

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Subsequent to December 31, 2015, the Company raised $376,250 from 10 investors as part of a Private Placement and issued 975,827 restricted shares of common stock with 975,827 warrants.

Subsequent to December 31, 2015, the Company paid off $154,303 of Convertible Notes outstanding as of December 31, 2015.

Subsequent to December 31, 2015, the Company converted $225,000 in Notes Payable outstanding at December 31, 2015 through the issuance of 876,150 of restricted shares of common stock and 876,150 warrants.

As a result of these issuances the total number of shares outstanding is 108,026,664.

28

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure of controls and procedures.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports, filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. In addition, the design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, a control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

As required by the SEC Rule 13a-15(b), we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2015. Based on the foregoing, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2015 at the reasonable assurance level due to the material weaknesses described below. 

In light of the material weaknesses described below, we performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures to ensure our financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  Nevertheless, Management determined in May 2016 to restate previously released financial statements as a result of inadvertently omitting two consulting agreements entered into in November 2015 which contained promissory notes with conversion privileges based on an undeterminable number of common stock shares.  As a result of this restatement, we believe that the financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

A material weakness is a control deficiency (within the meaning of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Auditing Standard No. 2) or combination of control deficiencies that result in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.  Management has identified the following two material weaknesses which have caused management to conclude that as of December 31, 2015 our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level:

1.  We do not have written documentation of our internal control policies and procedures.  Written documentation of key internal controls over financial reporting is a requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act which is applicable to us for the year ended December 31, 2015.  Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have written documentation of our internal controls and procedures on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

2.  We do not have sufficient segregation of duties within accounting functions, which is a basic internal control.  Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible.  However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals.  Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

To address these material weaknesses, management performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that the financial statements included herein fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position,

29

results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.  As a result of these additional procedures, Management determined that previously issued financial statements needed to be restated.

Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) require public companies to maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” which are defined as controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms.  Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

·  Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the   transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer;

·  Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the issuer; and

·  Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the issuer’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.  All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations.  Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.  Because of the inherent limitations of internal control, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting.  However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process.  Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

As of the end of our most recent fiscal year, management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments.  Based on that evaluation, they concluded that as of December 31, 2015, such internal control over financial reporting was not effective.  This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal control over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses.

The matters involving internal control over financial reporting that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were: (1) lack of a functioning audit committee due to a lack of a majority of independent members and a lack of a majority of outside

30

directors on our board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; and (2) inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives of having segregation of the initiation of transactions, the recording of transactions and the custody of assets.  The aforementioned material weaknesses were identified by our Chief Executive Officer in connection with the review of our financial statements as of December 31, 2015.

As a result of restating the financial statements, Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth in items (1) and (2) above did not have an effect on our financial results.  However, management believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and the lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors results in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures, which could result in a material misstatement in our financial statements in future periods.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.  Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only the management's report in this annual report.

Management's Remediation Initiatives

Management believes that the appointment of one or more outside directors, who shall be appointed to a fully functioning audit committee, will remedy the lack of a functioning audit committee and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our Board.

We anticipate that these initiatives will be at least partially, if not fully, implemented by December 31, 2016.

Changes in internal controls over financial reporting.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.  

Item 9B. Other Information.  

On April 3, 2013, the Company filed an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended (the “Articles of Incorporation”), in the form of a Certificate of Designation that authorized the issuance of up to one million (1,000,000) shares of a new series of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, designated “Series AA Super Voting Preferred Stock,” for which the board of directors established the rights, preferences and limitations thereof.  

The Company’s board of directors authorized the Series AA Super Voting Preferred Stock pursuant to the authority given to the board under the Articles of Incorporation, which authorizes the issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, and authorized the board, by resolution, to establish any or all

31

of the unissued shares of preferred stock, not then allocated to any series into one or more series and to fix and determine the designation of each such shares, the number of shares which shall constitute such series and certain preferences, limitations and relative rights of the shares of each series so established.

Each holder of outstanding shares of Series AA Super Voting Preferred Stock shall be entitled to one hundred thousand (100,000) votes for each share of Series AA Super Voting Preferred Stock held on the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote at each meeting of stockholders of the Company.  

The summary of the rights, privileges and preferences of the Series AA Super Voting Preferred Stock described above is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Certificate of Designation as filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Default on Notes

32

PART III

The following table sets forth the name and age of officers and director as of March 29, 2016. Our Executive officers are elected annually by our Board of Directors. Our executive officers hold their offices until they resign, are removed by the Board, or his successor is elected and qualified.  

Biographies

Michael Mann has been the President since January 2014.  Mr. Mann was the Vice President of Shareholder Relations from March 2012 to January 2014 for the Company and he brings significant related experience in business operations and corporate finance. From 2008 to March 2012, Mr. Mann has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Hanover Portfolio Acquisitions, Inc. formerly known as Hanover Asset Management, Inc.  Immediately prior thereto, Mr. Mann was the Founder, President, and Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Debt Settlement, Inc., a company listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. Mr. Mann had personally overseen the growth and development of U.S. Debt Settlement since 2003. From January 2002 to July 2003, Mr. Mann was the Chief Executive Officer of Shared Vision Capital, a boutique investment banking firm that assisted emerging companies with early seed capital and bridge loans. From October 1998 through December 2001, Mr. Mann was the Vice President of Investor Relations for JuriSearch.com, an online legal research platform. During his tenure with JuriSearch.com, Mr. Mann was directly responsible for financing for the company’s growth and development.  In addition, Mr. Mann founded and served as the president of Universal Pacific Communications, a privately owned telecommunications company. Under his leadership, Universal Pacific developed a fiber optic disaster recovery telecommunications network.

Except as set forth in our discussion below in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,” none of our directors or executive officers has been involved in any transactions with us or any of our directors, executive officers, affiliates or associates which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Commission.

Code of Ethics

We do not have a code of ethics that applies to our officers, employees and directors.

Corporate Governance

The business and affairs of the company are managed under the direction of our board. We have a board consisting of one member.. In addition to the contact information in this annual report, each stockholder will be given specific

33

information on how he/she can direct communications to the officers and our director of the corporation. All material communications from stockholders are relayed to our board.

Role in Risk Oversight

Our board is primarily responsible for overseeing our risk management processes. The board receives and reviews periodic reports from management, auditors, legal counsel, and others, as considered appropriate regarding our company’s assessment of risks. The board focuses on the most significant risks facing our company and our company’s general risk management strategy, and also ensures that risks undertaken by our company are consistent with the board’s appetite for risk. While the board oversees our company’s risk management, management is responsible for day-to-day risk management processes. We believe this division of responsibilities is the most effective approach for addressing the risks facing our company and that our board leadership structure supports this approach.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

We became subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“34 Act”) on June 15, 2015 when we filed a Form 8-A.  Our officers and director have made appropriate filings under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, although on two occasions, Mr. Mann filed his Form 4 a few days late. These instances involved reporting of open market purchases and did not involve any short swing profits.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The following executives of the Company received compensation in the amounts set forth in the chart below for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. No other item of compensation was paid to any officer or director of the Company other than reimbursement of expenses.

Summary Compensation Table

There were no outstanding equity awards for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Compensation of Directors

The directors receive no compensation for serving as directors. However, the Company may reimburse its directors for any out-of-pocket cost reasonably incurred to attend a Board meeting.

Employment Agreements

34

All of the new officers pursuant to the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement dated March 14, 2012 have agreed to accrue and defer payment of their compensation until the Company has generated sufficient financing proceeds or revenue to pay such compensation. Initially, Messrs. Collier and Mann shall each receive compensation of $10,000 per month. In addition, each officer will get additional compensation in connection with any company that such officer originates upon the finalization of a licensing arrangement with such company.

Finally, Messrs. Collier and Mann shall receive additional compensation in the form of shares of restricted Company common stock that vest over time based upon their remaining with the Company.

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our shares of common stock beneficially owned as of March 29, 2016, for (i) each stockholder known to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of our outstanding shares of common stock, (ii) each named executive officer and director, and (iii) all executive officers and directors as a group. A person is considered to beneficially own any shares: (i) over which such person, directly or indirectly, exercises sole or shared voting or investment power, or (ii) of which such person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership at any time within 60 days through an exercise of stock options or warrants. Unless otherwise indicated, voting and investment power relating to the shares shown in the table for our directors and executive officers is exercised solely by the beneficial owner or shared by the owner and the owner’s spouse or children.

For purposes of this table, a person or group of persons is deemed to have “beneficial ownership” of any shares of common stock that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days of March 29, 2016. For purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding shares of our common stock held by each person or group of persons named above, any shares that such person or persons has the right to acquire within 60 days of March 29, 2016 is deemed to be outstanding, but is not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. The inclusion herein of any shares listed as beneficially owned does not constitute an admission of beneficial ownership. Unless otherwise specified, the address of each of the persons set forth below is care of the company at the address of: 6320 Canoga Avenue, 15^th Floor Woodland Hills, CA 91367.

On November 16, 2014, the Company acquired a promissory note to Donnie Rudd for a principal amount of $96,000 which along with accrued interest was converted into 350,000 shares of common stock on December 21, 2015. On March 31, 2014, the Company issued a promissory note to Michael Mann for a principal amount of $70,000.  The Note carries an interest rate of 12% per annum and a maturity date of September 30, 2016 with interest due monthly. On September 20, 2014, the Company issued a promissory note to Don Calabria for a principal amount of $75,000.  The Note carries an interest rate of 10% per annum and a maturity date of September 20, 2016 with interest due monthly. On October 29, 2014, the Company issued a promissory note to Michael Mann for a principal amount of $50,000.  The Note carries an interest rate of 12% per annum and a maturity date of September 29, 2016 with interest due monthly.   In the opinion of management, these notes were on terms no less favorable to the lenders than the Company might have obtained from an unaffiliated party.  

35

Director Independence

We do not have any independent directors. Because our common stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange, we have used the definition of “independence” of The NASDAQ Stock Market to make this determination.  NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2) provides that an “independent director” is a person other than an officer or employee of the company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the Company’s Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.  The NASDAQ listing rules provide that a director cannot be considered independent if:

Mr. Alan Collier is not considered independent because he is the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

Audit Fees

For the Company’s fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, we were billed approximately $25,000 and $46,000 for professional services rendered for the audit and review of our financial statements.

Audit Related Fees

There were no fees for audit related services for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

Tax Fees

For the Company’s fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, we were billed approximately $0 and $0 for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.

All Other Fees

The Company did not incur any other fees related to services rendered by our principal accountant for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

Effective May 6, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted rules that require that before our auditor is engaged by us to render any auditing or permitted non-audit related service, the engagement be:

36

We do not have an audit committee.  Our board of directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors. The pre-approval process has just been implemented in response to the new rules. Therefore, our board of directors does not have records of what percentage of the above fees was pre-approved.  However, all of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by the board of directors either before or after the respective services were rendered.

37

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(1) Financial Statements and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, which are set forth in the index to Consolidated Financial Statements of this report.

(2) Financial Statement Schedule: None.

(3) Exhibits