Biodel Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary (collectively, "Biodel" or the "Company") is a specialty pharmaceutical company located in Danbury, Connecticut. The Company was incorporated in the State of Delaware on December 3, 2003 and commenced operations in January 2004. The Company formed a wholly owned inactive subsidiary in the United Kingdom in October 2011 ("Biodel UK Limited").

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company and are unaudited. These condensed consolidated financial statements include Biodel UK Limited. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. In the opinion of management, the Company has made all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary to fairly present the financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("US GAAP") have been consolidated or omitted. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2015. The results of operations for the three and six months ended March 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full fiscal year or any other interim period.

The Company's 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Purchase Plan") was adopted by its board of directors and approved by its stockholders on March 20, 2007. The Purchase Plan became effective upon the closing of the Company's initial public offering. The Purchase Plan is intended to qualify as an employee stock purchase plan within the meaning of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Under the Purchase Plan, eligible employees may contribute up to 15% of their eligible earnings for the period of that offering to be withheld for the purchase of common stock under the Purchase Plan. The employee's purchase price is equal to the lower of: 85% of the fair market value per share on the start date of the offering period in which the

employee is enrolled or 85% of the fair market value per share on the semi-annual purchase date. The Purchase Plan imposes a limitation upon a participant's right to acquire common stock if immediately after the purchase the employee would own 5% or more of the total combined voting power or value of the Company's common stock or of any of its affiliates. The Purchase Plan provides for an automatic rollover when the purchase price for a new offering period is lower than previously established purchase price(s). The Purchase Plan also provides for a one-time election that allows an employee the opportunity to enroll into a new offering period when the new offering is higher than their current offering price. This election must be made within 30 days from the start of a new offering period. Offering periods are twenty-seven months in length. The compensation charge/(credit) in connection with the Purchase Plan for the three and six months ended March 31, 2016 was $0. In comparison, for the three and six months ended March 31, 2015, the Company expensed $1 and $4, respectively.

An aggregate of 550,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance pursuant to purchase rights to be granted to the Company's eligible employees under the Purchase Plan. The Purchase Plan shares are replenished annually on the first day of each calendar year by virtue of an evergreen provision. The provision allows for share replenishment equal to the lesser of 1% of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding on that date or 25,000 shares. As of March 31, 2015 and 2016, a total of 401,262 and 395,382 shares, respectively, were reserved and available for issuance under the Purchase Plan. As of March 31, 2015 and 2016, the Company has issued 123,738 and 154,618 shares, respectively, under the Purchase Plan.

On April 20, 2015, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 37,500,000 shares of its common stock, which included the full exercise of the underwriter's option to purchase 4,891,304 shares to cover overallotments, at a price to the public of $0.92 per share. The Company received net proceeds from this offering, after deducting underwriting discounts, commissions and expenses of $32,149.

On July 25, 2014, the Company entered into a purchase agreement (the "Purchase Agreement"), together with a registration rights agreement (the "Registration Rights Agreement") with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC ("LPC"). Under the terms, and subject to the conditions of the Purchase Agreement, the Company had the right to sell to LPC, and LPC was obligated to purchase, up to $15 million in shares of common stock, subject to certain limitations, from time to time over the 36-month period commencing on the date that a registration statement, which the Company agreed to file with the SEC pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, was declared effective by the SEC and a final prospectus in connection therewith was filed. The Company's registration statement was declared effective on September 2, 2014. The Company was obligated, within twenty (20) calendar days, to file with the SEC an initial Registration Statement covering the maximum number of Registrable Securities permitted to be included thereon in accordance with applicable SEC rules, regulations and interpretations so as to permit the resale of such Registrable Securities by LPC under Rule 415 under the Securities Act at then prevailing market prices (and not fixed prices), as mutually determined by both the Company and LPC in consultation with their respective legal counsel, subject to the aggregate number of authorized shares of the Company's Common Stock then available for issuance in its Certificate of Incorporation. The Company was required to use its commercially reasonable efforts to keep the Registration Statement effective pursuant to Rule 415 promulgated under the Securities Act and available for the resale by LPC of all of the Registrable Securities covered thereby at all times until the date on which LPC shall have resold all the Registrable Securities covered thereby and no available amount remained under the Purchase Agreement. The Company could direct LPC, at its sole discretion and subject to certain conditions, to purchase up to 150,000 shares of common stock in any business day, increasing to amounts of up to 250,000 shares, depending upon the closing sale price of the common stock. In addition, the Company could direct LPC to purchase additional shares as accelerated purchases if, on the date of a regular purchase, the closing sale price of the common stock was not below $2.50 per share (subject to adjustment). The purchase price of shares of common stock purchased under the Purchase Agreement were based on the prevailing market prices of such shares at the time of sales, but in no event could the Company sell shares to LPC on a day when the closing sale price of the common stock was less than a floor price of $1.50 per share (subject to adjustment). The Company could control the timing and amount of any sales of common stock to LPC under the Purchase Agreement. As consideration for LPC's commitment to purchase shares of common stock pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company issued to LPC 95,000 shares of Common Stock as commitment shares, with a fair market value of $189, which is recorded as the cost of capital in additional paid in capital. In aggregate, the Company has sold 750,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, and received proceeds, net of expenses, of $1,161.

On April 14, 2015, the Company provided written notice of termination of the Purchase Agreement pursuant to the terms of the agreement. The termination became effective on April 16, 2015.

In May 2013, the Company entered into an At-the-Market Issuance Sales Agreement (the "Sales Agreement") with MLV & Co. LLC ("MLV"), under which the Company may initially issue and sell shares of common stock having aggregate sales proceeds of up to an additional $3,200 from time to time through MLV as the Company's sales agent. In aggregate, the Company has sold 2,607,535 shares of common stock pursuant to the Sales Agreement and received proceeds, net of sales agent commissions and expenses, of $4,700.

In June 2012, the Company completed a private placement (the "2012 Private Placement") of an aggregate of 4,250,020 shares of the Company's common stock, 3,605,607 shares of the Company's Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,749,469 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.66 per share. For each unit consisting of either a share of common stock or Series B Preferred Stock and a warrant to purchase 0.35 of a share of common stock, the purchasers in the 2012 Private Placement paid a negotiated price of $2.355. The warrants were immediately exercisable and will expire on June 26, 2017, five years from the original issuance date of June 27, 2012. The Company received net proceeds, after deducting placement agents' fees and other transaction expenses, of approximately $17,100 from the 2012 Private Placement. Each share of Series B Preferred Stock was convertible into one share of the Company's common stock at any time at the option of the holder, except that the securities purchase agreement that the Company entered into in connection with the 2012 Private Placement (the "Securities Purchase Agreement") provides that a holder would be prohibited from converting shares of Series B Preferred Stock into shares of common stock if, as a result of such conversion, such holder, together with its affiliates, would beneficially own more than 9.98% of the total number of shares of common stock then issued and outstanding. In the event of the Company's liquidation, dissolution or winding up, holders of the Series B Preferred Stock will receive a payment equal to $0.01 per share of Series B Preferred Stock before any proceeds are distributed to the holders of common stock. After the payment of this preferential amount, and subject to the rights of holders of any class or series of capital stock specifically ranking by its terms senior to the Series B Preferred Stock holders of Series B Preferred Stock would participate ratably in the distribution of any remaining assets with the common stock and any other class or series of capital stock that participates with the common stock in such distributions. Shares of Series B Preferred Stock generally have no voting rights, except as required by law and except that the consent of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Series B Preferred Stock would be required to amend the terms of the Series B Preferred Stock. Holders of Series B Preferred Stock were entitled to receive, and the Company was required to pay, dividends on shares of the Series B Preferred Stock equal (on an as-if-converted-to-common-stock basis) to and in the same form as dividends (other than dividends in the form of common stock) actually paid on shares of the common stock when, as and if such dividends (other than dividends in the form of common stock) were paid on shares of the common stock. All Series B Preferred Stock has been converted into common stock and none remains outstanding.

As required by the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 (the "Registration Statement") with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on July 27, 2012, which was within 30 days after the closing of the 2012 Private Placement. The Registration Statement, which was declared effective on August 13, 2012, registers the resale of the shares of common stock and Series B Preferred Stock issued and sold in the 2012 Private Placement, the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock issued and sold in the 2012 Private Placement, and the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants issued and sold in the 2012 Private Placement. Pursuant to the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to pay liquidated damages to the purchasers in the 2012 Private Placement if, after effectiveness of the Registration Statement and subject to certain specified exceptions, the Company suspends the use of the Registration Statement or the Registration Statement ceases to remain continuously effective as to all the securities for which it is required to be effective (each such event, a "Registration Default"). Subject to specified exceptions, for each 30-day period or portion thereof during which a Registration Default remains uncured, the Company is obligated to pay liquidated damages to each purchaser in cash in an amount equal to 1.0% of the aggregate purchase price paid by each such purchaser in the 2012 Private Placement, up to a maximum of 8.0% of such aggregate purchase price. As of the date of these financial

statements, the Company does not believe that it is probable that it will be obligated to pay any such liquidated damages. Accordingly, the Company has not established an accrual for liquidated damages.

In the event that the Company enters into a merger or change of control transaction, the holders of the warrants issued in the 2012 Private Placement will be entitled to receive consideration as if they had exercised the warrants immediately prior to such transaction, or they may require the Company to purchase the unexercised warrants at the Black-Scholes value (as defined in the warrant) of the warrant on the date of such transaction. The holders have up to 30 days following any such transaction to exercise this right. As a result of this provision, the Company recognizes the warrants as liabilities at their fair value on each reporting date.

At March 31, 2016, the fair value of the warrant liability determined utilizing the Black-Scholes valuation model was approximately $3. In comparison, the fair value of the warrant liability at September 30, 2015 was $5.

During the three and six months ended March 31, 2016, the Company recorded an adjustment to fair value of common stock warrant liability of $2 within Other income, to reflect a decrease in the valuation of the warrants from September 30, 2015 to March 31, 2016.

The following summarizes the changes in value of the warrant liability from September 30, 2015 through March 31, 2016:

In May 2011, the Company completed a registered direct offering (the "May 2011 Offering") of an aggregate of 3,018,736 shares of the Company's common stock, 1,813,944 shares of the Company's Series A Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase 2,256,929 shares of the Company's common stock. The shares and warrants were sold in units consisting of (i) one share of common stock and (ii) one warrant to purchase 0.1625 of a share of common stock, at an exercise price of $9.92 per share of the Company's common stock. However, one investor also purchased units consisting of one share of Series A Preferred Stock and a warrant to purchase 0.1625 of a share of common stock. No fractional warrants were issued. Each unit was sold at a price of $8.64 per unit. These units were not issued or certificated. The shares and warrants were immediately separated. The warrants will expire on May 17, 2016, five years from the original issuance date of May 18, 2011. The Company received net proceeds, after deducting placement agents' fees and other offering expenses, of approximately $28,000 from the May 2011 Offering. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock was convertible into one quarter of a share of the Company's common stock at any time at the option of the holder, provided that the holder was prohibited from converting the shares of Series A Preferred Stock into shares of the Company's common stock if, as a result of such conversion, the holder, together with its affiliates, would beneficially own more than 9.98% of the total number of shares of the Company's common stock then issued and outstanding. All Series A Preferred Stock has been converted into common stock and none remains outstanding.

In the event that the Company enters into a merger or change of control transaction, the holders of the warrants issued in the May 2011 Offering will be entitled to receive consideration as if they had exercised the warrants immediately prior to such transaction, or they may require the Company to purchase the unexercised warrants at the Black-Scholes value (as defined in the warrant) of the warrant on the date of such transaction. As per terms of the warrant, the holders have up to 30 days following any such transaction to exercise this right. As a result of this provision, the Company recognizes the warrants as liabilities at their fair value on each reporting date.

At March 31, 2016, the fair value of the warrant liability determined utilizing the Black-Scholes valuation model was approximately $0. In comparison, the fair value of the warrant liability at September 30, 2015 was $0.

The Company has determined its warrant liability to be a Level 3 fair value measurement and used the Black-Scholes valuation model to calculate, as of March 31, 2016, the fair value of the warrants issued in the 2012 Private Placement and the May 2011 Offering.

As of March 31, 2016, the Company estimated such fair value using the following assumptions:

Risk-Free Interest Rate. This is the United States Treasury rate for the measurement date having a term equal to the expected remaining term of the warrant. An increase in the risk-free interest rate will increase the fair value and the associated derivative liability.

Term of Warrants. This is the period of time over which the warrant is expected to remain outstanding and is based on management's estimate of the remaining contractual life.

Expected Volatility. This is a measure of the amount by which the stock price has fluctuated or is expected to fluctuate. The Company uses a weighted-average of its historic volatility over the retrospective period corresponding to the expected remaining term of the warrants on the measurement date. An increase in the expected volatility will increase the fair value and the associated derivative liability.

Dividend Yield. The Company has not made any dividend payments nor does it have plans to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. An increase in the dividend yield will decrease the fair value and the associated derivative liability.

If at any time the Company grants, issues or sells securities or other property to holders of any class of common stock, the holders of the warrants are entitled to also acquire those same securities as if they held the number of shares of common stock acquirable upon complete exercise of the warrants.

As such, given that the warrant holders will participate fully on any dividends or dividend equivalents, the Company determined that the warrants are participating securities and therefore are subject to ASC 260-10-55 earnings per share. These securities were excluded from the three and six months ended March 31, 2015 and 2016 loss per share calculation since their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

As of March 31, 2016, the Company leased three facilities in Danbury, Connecticut.

The Company extended its lease for laboratory space in January 2016 for an additional three months through April 30, 2016. This lease provides for annual basic lease payments of $68, plus the annual Consumers Price Index ("CPI") increase for October, not to exceed 6%, plus operating expenses. This lease expired on April 30, 2016 and was not renewed.

The Company also extended its lease agreement for additional office space adjacent to its laboratory space in January 2016 for an additional three months through April 30, 2016. This lease provides for annual basic lease payments of $31, plus the annual CPI increase for October, not to exceed 6%, plus operating expenses. This lease expired on April 30, 2016 and was not renewed.

In November 2013, the Company renewed its lease for its corporate office for five years. This lease provides for annual basic lease payments of $388, plus the annual CPI increase for May, not to exceed 6%, plus operating expenses.

Rent expense for the three and six months ended March 31, 2016 was $168 and $335, respectively. In comparison, rent expense for the three and six months ended March 31, 2015, was $167 and $333, respectively.

The Company has entered into certain licensing and collaboration agreements for products currently under development. The Company may be obligated in future periods to make additional payments, which would become due and payable only upon the achievement of certain research and development, regulatory, and approval milestones. The specific timing of such milestones cannot be predicted and depend upon future discretionary research and clinical developments, as well as, regulatory agency actions. Further, under the terms of certain agreements the Company may be obligated to pay commercial milestones contingent upon the realization of sales revenues and sublicense revenues. Due to the long range nature of such commercial milestones, they are neither probable at this time nor predictable, and consequently are not considered contingent milestone payment amounts.

The Company follows the provisions of ASC Topic 420, "Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations", which addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities. The statement requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. The Company records liabilities that primarily include severance and other costs related to employee benefits, as appropriate. Restructuring and other costs were $3,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and $3,300 for the six months ended March 31, 2016, and represent severance and other costs related to employee benefits. These costs were expensed in the three and six months ended March 31, 2016, and are aggregated in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations on the Research and development and General and administrative expense lines. The restructuring plan is primarily designed to reduce infrastructure and operational costs as the Company continues to explores its strategic alternatives. In comparison, restructuring and other costs were $0 for the three and six months ended March 31, 2015. The following summarizes the activities related to the restructuring accruals on the balance sheet:

Restructuring and other long term liabilities:

•the success of our efforts, and those of our advisors, in exploring, and possibly executing on, our strategic alternatives, while preserving our cash balance to the extent practicable;

•the progress, timing or success of our research and development and clinical programs for our product candidates, particularly our glucagon emergency management, or GEM, product candidate, which comprises lyophilized glucagon and an aqueous diluent in an automatic reconstitution device, and our concentrated ultra-rapid-acting insulin product candidate, BIOD-531, which uses regular human insulin, or RHI, as the active pharmaceutical ingredient in a concentration of 400 units per milliliter;

•our ability to conduct the development work necessary to finalize the formulation and presentation of our GEM product candidate, as well as the preclinical studies, clinical trials and manufacturing activities necessary to support the submission of a new drug application, or NDA, to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, for that product candidate;

•the ability and willingness of our existing strategic partners, service providers and suppliers, upon which we rely in the advancement of our product candidates, to meet the obligations set forth in our agreements with them, including Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc., or Unilife, which is responsible for designing and manufacturing the device intended for use with our GEM product candidate, as well as delivering three registration lots of the filled and finished GEM device required for submitting an NDA to the FDA;

•the results of our real-time stability programs for our glucagon-, RHI-, and insulin analog-based product candidates, including the reproducibility of earlier, smaller scale, stability studies and our ability to accurately project long term stability on the basis of accelerated testing;

•our ability to accurately anticipate technical challenges that we may face in the development of our product candidates;

•our ability to secure approval by the FDA for our product candidates under Section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, or FFDCA;

•the degree of clinical utility of our product candidates, particularly with regard to our ultra-rapid-acting insulin formulations, which have not yet been shown to be clinically superior to existing rapid-acting insulin analogs;

•our ability to enter into collaboration arrangements for the commercialization of our product candidates and the success or failure of any such collaborations into which we enter, or our ability to commercialize our product candidates ourselves;

•our ability to enforce our patents for our product candidates and our ability to secure additional patents for our product candidates;

•our ability to protect our intellectual property and operate our business without infringing upon the intellectual property rights of others;

•the emergence of competing technologies and products and other adverse market developments, such as advancements in glucagon stabilization technologies or delivery devices, that could enable a room-temperature rescue product in a portable, easy to use presentation;

•the ability of our contract manufacturing organizations or collaborators to timely and properly produce our products in our final dosage form and in the quantities we may require;

•our ability to secure adequate supplies of active pharmaceutical ingredients to support our product development programs and, if successful, the commercialization of one or more product candidates;

•our ability to maintain the listing of our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market;

•our capabilities and strategies for manufacturing, marketing and commercializing a product candidate; and

•our ability to accurately estimate anticipated operating losses, future revenues, capital requirements and our needs for additional financing.

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business and related financing, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should read the "Risk Factors" section of our report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 and other subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.

We are a specialty biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of innovative treatments for diabetes that may be safer, more effective and more convenient for patients. We develop our product candidates by applying our formulation technologies to existing drugs in order to improve their therapeutic profiles. Our glucagon formulations and presentations are designed to be stable at room temperature and are intended for use by caregivers with little to no medical training as a rescue treatment for diabetes patients experiencing severe hypoglycemia. Our proprietary insulin formulations are designed to be more rapid-acting than the formulations currently available to Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes patients. We refer to these as "ultra-rapid-acting" insulin formulations.

Our lead glucagon product candidate is a glucagon emergency management, or GEM, drug-device combination that is intended to treat diabetes patients experiencing severe hypoglycemia, or very low concentrations of blood glucose. GEM is comprised of lyophilized glucagon and an aqueous diluent in a proprietary injection device from Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc., or Unilife. The GEM device is a dual-chamber design that automatically reconstitutes lyophilized glucagon immediately prior to injection and features automatic needle retraction on full dose delivery. GEM is designed with the goal of optimizing its ease of use for patient caregivers in an emergency.

In the third quarter of calendar year 2014, we submitted an Investigational New Drug application, or IND, to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, for our GEM product candidate. We have completed a Phase 1 clinical trial to assess the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of BIOD-961, the reconstituted glucagon formulation intended for use in the GEM device. In the Phase 1 clinical trial, the overall pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of BIOD-961 were statistically indistinguishable from the two comparator glucagon formulations marketed by Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk. In April 2015, we announced results from a formative human factors study of our GEM product candidate in which the GEM device demonstrated a substantial improvement in ease-of-use, frequency of successful administration and reduction in the error rate when compared to the commercially available glucagon kits. Despite these advancements, the timing of the development program for our GEM product candidate is uncertain. Further progress requires at least three registration batches of the fully filled and finished GEM device so that we may conduct the pivotal clinical study, human factors study and stability studies required for an NDA submission to the FDA. Previously, we anticipated that Unilife would deliver the registration batches toward the end of the 2015 calendar year. However, Unilife has informed us that the projected GEM device development timelines were no longer accurate, and discussions with Unilife to resolve a dispute regarding the requirements of our customization and commercial supply contract with them have been unsuccessful. We have initiated formal legal proceedings in Superior Court in the State of Connecticut and with the American Arbitration Association to address Unilife's alleged violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, or CUTPA, and alleged breaches of contract in connection with the GEM program. Until such time as we are able to resolve these matters, if at all, we will be unable to continue to develop our GEM product candidate. We cannot give any assurance as to the outcome of our legal proceedings with Unilife or the ultimate development of our GEM product candidate.

In addition to our GEM product candidate, we have made efforts to develop ultra-rapid-acting proprietary insulin formulations that are designed to be more rapid-acting than the formulations currently available to Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes patients. BIOD-531, a concentrated ultra-rapid-acting insulin formulation, combines recombinant human insulin, or RHI, with our proprietary combination of excipients to increase the rate of absorption following subcutaneous injection when compared to other commercially available insulin formulations, including "rapid-acting" mealtime insulin analogs such as Humalog®, marketed by Eli Lilly, NovoLog®, marketed by Novo Nordisk, and Apidra®, marketed by Sanofi. BIOD-531 contains 400 units of RHI per milliliter (instead of the standard 100 units per milliliter), and is formulated with EDTA, citrate and magnesium sulfate. When delivered by subcutaneous injection, BIOD-531 is characterized by a rapid onset of action and a prolonged duration of action, which we believe could address an unmet medical need for a concentrated insulin with an initial rate of absorption superior to that of existing concentrated insulins and prandial/basal premixed insulins and comparable or superior to that of existing rapid-acting insulin analogs.

In addition to our RHI-based ultra-rapid-acting insulin formulations, we have used our proprietary excipients to develop pre-clinical analog-based ultra-rapid-acting insulin formulations using either insulin lispro, the active pharmaceutical ingredient in Humalog®, or insulin aspart, the active pharmaceutical ingredient in NovoLog®.

In December 2015, we announced that our board of directors approved a plan to explore strategic alternatives to further realize value from our pipeline assets while preserving our cash balance to the extent practicable. In January 2016, we retained Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. to assist us in this process. Also in January 2016, we completed a reduction in force of 15 non-executive employees designed to reduce our operating expenditures while we explore our strategic alternatives. The January 2016 reduction in force is in addition to the ten-person reduction in force we completed in October 2015, which was designed to reduce infrastructure costs and improve efficiency of research and quality-related activities.

We were incorporated in December 2003 and commenced active operations in January 2004. To date, we have generated no revenues and have incurred significant losses. We expect to continue to incur operating losses as we continue our efforts to develop and commercialize our product candidates and execute on our strategic alternatives. We have financed our operations through various financing transactions, including our initial public offering in May 2007 and several subsequent transactions, including, most recently, our April 2015 underwritten public offering. In addition, we recently raised funds pursuant to our At-the-Market Issuance Sales Agreement with MLV & Co. LLC, or MLV, and our since-terminated equity line stock purchase agreement with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC, or LPC. We may issue shares of our common stock pursuant to our agreement with MLV in the future. We have devoted substantially all of our efforts to research and development activities, including clinical trials. Our net loss was $5.9 million and $9.1 million for the three and six months ended March 31, 2016.

As of March 31, 2016 we had approximately $33.5 million in cash and cash equivalents, compared to $40.8 million in cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2015. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund our anticipated operating expenses and capital expenditures for the foreseeable future.