UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

[X]  Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015

or

[ ]  Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from ________ to ________.

Commission File Number: 333-192217

ATACAMA RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.0001 par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes [ ]  No  [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

Yes [ ]  No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X]  No [ ]

1

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   

Yes [ ]  No [X]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting registrant.

(Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell registrant (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [ ]  No [X]

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. The market value of the registrant’s voting $.0001 par value common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant at June 30, 2015 was approximately $1,593.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.  The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s only class of common stock, as of April 21, 2016 was 114,755,001 shares of its $.0001 par value common stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

  None.

2

Atacama Resources International, Inc.

Form 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015

Table of Contents

3

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This annual report on Form 10-K of Atacama Resources International, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2015 contains certain forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created thereby.  To the extent that such statements are not recitations of historical fact, such statements constitute forward looking statements which, by definition involve risks and uncertainties. In particular, statements under the Sections; Description of Business, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contain forward looking statements. Where in any forward looking statements, the Company expresses an expectation or belief as to future results or events, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis, but there can be no assurance that the statement of expectation or belief will result or be achieved or accomplished.

The following are factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated, and include but are not limited to: general economic, financial and business conditions; changes in and compliance with governmental regulations; changes in tax laws; and the cost and effects of legal proceedings.

You should not rely on forward looking statements in this annual report.  This annual report contains forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.  We use words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “plans,” “expects,” “future,” “intends,” and similar expressions to identify these forward-looking statements.  Prospective investors should not place undue reliance on these forward looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this annual report.  Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.

4

PART I

Item 1: Business

Atacama Resources International, Inc., (hereinafter “the Company”) is a company incorporated in the State of Florida in June 2013. We were formed as a consultant to the Mining industry. The Mining industry is subject to constant change due to market trends, thereby making it extremely competitive.  However, the Company made the decision in 2015 to further enter the mining industry by actually staking claims and working acquired mining properties.  The Company has also made the management decision to acquire other high tech products and companies as appropriate to enhance the value of the company.  Accordingly, the Company is now an emerging diversified US public company. This includes holding and working precious metal properties in the Kirkland Lake region in Ontario, Canada. The company also offers executive advisory relating to growing microcap companies through the going public process.  Lastly, the company acquired Good2Drive, Inc., a newly formed US corporation that developed and owns a smartphone App called Good2Drive for both Apple and Android smartphones that measures the driver’s cognitive ability to drive vehicles safely on the nation’s highways and byways.  

Overview, Mining – the Company’ mining interests include forty two claims in a 1680 acre mine in the high mineral content Kirkland Lake area of Ontario. This mine is less than two miles from the Kirkland Lake Gold, Inc. mining operation that has a long and successful history of recovering high concentrations of gold.  The Company’s mine is easily accessible from TransCanada Highway 11, a major north-south highway in Ontario.  The mine is also near a train line and airstrips.  The nearby towns of Swastika and Kirkland Lakes will provide abundant opportunities for employees for the mine.  The mine has been leased through 2032 and the taxes are current.  The focus of the exploration will be for copper/gold and graphite.  However zinc, platinum and palladium have been found on the property and will be mined if proven commercially viable.  Geophysical testing has determined the preferred survey grid, two holes have been drilled, several hundred core samples have been taken and the samples are being assayed at this time.

Overview, Good2Drive, Inc. - The Good2Drive app is hosted on both Apple and Android smartphone and consists of a 30-45 second test developed by a Stanford professor that measures alertness in terms of short term memory and reaction time and notifies the responsible party that the user has taken the test, and whether he/she fails or passes.  Our first priority and initial product offering is focusing on young drivers and parents working together to make driving the family vehicles much safer and commercial drivers and employers working together to make the nation’s highways safer for all drivers. The result is to save thousands of lives on the road in the United States, Canada and other countries around the world.  

5

It is important to describe the science of the pioneering Good2Drive alertness test.  If Good2Drive can replace the breathalyzer for alcohol while adding conclusive criteria regarding marijuana and other impairment issues, the impact on our nation’s roads will be immeasurable.  With several states now having legal marijuana and more states to follow, marijuana will become a more serious issue in regard to driver impairment.  When we add to that the millions of people using prescription and illegal drugs that clearly diminish the person’s ability to avoid accidents in emergency situations and we have to conclude that roads will become unsafe at an alarming rate.  Lastly, the issue of driver fatigue for commercial drivers who are on the road too long and the issue of any driver who suffers from lack of sleep and we have a common denominator.  These people can be a danger in any driving situation and a way must be found to find these people before they are involved in a vehicular accident.  Scientific studies have been published for thirty years that indicate a positive correlation between alertness, short term memory and reaction time to outside stimulus.  More recent studies have determined that any specific condition, whether caused by elevated alcohol levels in the blood stream, the use of marijuana and other drugs or simply the lack of sleep and fatigue will affect short term memory and reaction time.  This vastly reduced reaction time will virtually always increase the risk of having an accident while on the road.  This is the basis for the Company’s Good2Drive test.

Overview, Consulting – the Company is focused on both mining operations in Canada and managing and selling Good2Drive in both the United States and Canada.  However, the consulting activities will be maintained as required to satisfy the needs of potential clients.  These activities may include:

-

International and domestic corporate development strategies; Strategic and financial partnering;

-

Mergers and acquisitions;

ARII has been doing business since inception, June 2013. Originally formed to do any and all legal business, the intent of the corporation was to specialize in corporate development and growth management consultation. However, in 2015 the focus of the company changed to actually managing mining operations and acquiring, managing and selling smartphone Apps. We are not a “blank check company” as such term is defined in Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 419.  We are a company with minimal revenues and limited operations but both the mining operation and revenue prospects for Good2Drive in 2016 are significant. The Company does now and will continue to include advisory services but the corporate focus is on managing successful gold mining operations and creating and selling smartphone Apps. The Company is always looking at potential acquisitions and any acquisitions that the Company may make in the future would be of companies similar in nature to our own, operating in similar or complementary industry segments or geographic location to enhance the Company with new growth opportunities and a competitive advantage.

6

We believe that our conduct to date evidences significant, bona fide business operations and a scenario that is wholly inapposite to any attempt to create the mere appearance of a specific business plan and effort to avoid the application of Rule 419.

Our general business strategy is to market our services to markets primarily in mining friendly regions of the United States of America. Our strategically located business development efforts are well positioned to benefit from the continuing need for our services, sales of smartphone Apps and managing mining operations.  We recognize that current market conditions are extremely challenging.  Accordingly, we have adapted our business plan and strategy with the goal of protecting liquidity, enhancing our balance sheet and positioning ourselves for future growth when market conditions improve.  In connection with this strategy, we have adopted a conservative approach and our principal business strategy is to utilize our sales expertise to:

-

Sell consulting services throughout selected regions of the United States, Canada, and Chile;

-

provide consistently reliable high-quality service;

-

aggressively manage operating costs to maintain and improve operating margins;

-

expand business by improving, enhancing and expanding sales, gaining new customers;

-

pursue complementary “bolt on” growth opportunities having acceptable risks and returns; and

-

generate consistent revenue, operating margins, earnings and cash flows.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

Because we are a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide the information required by this item.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

NONE

Item 2. Properties

We do not own any real property. Our principal business office is located at 1200 South Pine Island Road, Plantation, Florida 33324.  The owners of our offices do not presently receive any remuneration for the use of the offices. We do not believe that we will need to obtain additional office space at any time in the foreseeable future, approximately 6 months, until our business plan is more fully implemented. As a result of our method of operations and business plan, we do not currently require personnel other than Mr. Grant, CEO, Mr. Finch, COO and Mr. Roy, CFO to conduct our business. In the future, we anticipate requiring additional office space and additional personnel; however, it is unknown at this time how much space or how many individuals will be required.

7

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings nor are any contemplated by us at this time.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable

8

PART II

Item 5. Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Small Business Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities  

    Item 5(a)

a)  Market Information.  There is presently no public market for our common stock.  There is no assurance that a trading market will develop, or, if developed, that it will be sustained.  A purchaser of shares may, therefore, find it difficult to resell our securities offered herein should he or she desire to do so when eligible for public resale

b)  Holders.  At April 21, 2016, there were approximately 65 shareholders of the registrant.

c)  Dividends.  Since inception we have not paid any dividends on our common stock.  We currently do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future on our common stock.  Although we intend to retain our earnings, if any, to finance the exploration and growth of our business, our Board of Directors will have the discretion to declare and pay dividends in the future.  Payment of dividends in the future will depend upon our earnings, capital requirements, and other factors, that our Board of Directors may deem relevant.

d)  Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.  Not applicable.

e)  Performance graph.  Not applicable.

f)  Sale of unregistered securities.  

On March 24, 2014, the Company issued 325,000 shares, at $0.10 per share, to Soellingen Advisory Group, Inc., a non-related party, in exchange for consulting services totaling $32,500.

In August 2014, the Board of Directors cancelled 12 million shares that were issued in anticipation of services to be performed. The following shares were cancelled due to non-performance. The shares were originally issued at par $0.0001.

1. Foster Smith

6,000,000

2. Bruce Hartley

2,000,000

3. Gerald Ernst

2,000,000

4. Kavita Khandelwal

2,000,000

9

On August 29, 2014, the Company issued at $.0001 per share 1,200,000 shares to Ken Olsen, Former CEO and director, 2,098,600 shares to Glenn Grant, CEO and director, 125,000 shares to Raymond Skaff, director, 1,648,840 shares to Nelson Riis, advisor and 6,927,560 shares to other non-related parties that have been instrumental in the progress of the company for services rendered.  The Company issued a total of 12 million shares at a par value of $0.001 per share for consulting services totaling $1,200.

On August 7, 2015, the Company issued 12,000,000 shares to 1172321 Alberta Ltd., a related party, 12,000,000 shares to 1778928 Alberta Ltd., a related party, 12,000,000 shares to BOWER Solutions, a related party, 8,400,000 shares to Daniel Finch, COO and director, 2,400,000 shares to Nelson Riis, advisor, 2,400,000 shares to Arnold Allsopp, advisor and 2,400,000 shares to Seal River Exploration Ltd., a non-related party that have been instrumental in the progress of the company for services rendered.

On September 21, 2015, the Company issued at $0.0001 per share 3,600,000 shares to Dianne Finch, a related party, 10,000,000 shares to Richard Roy, CFO and director, and 300,000 shares to Tammy Kaleta, a non-related party for exchange of services instrumental to the progress of the company.

On September 21, 2015, the Company issued 333,333 shares at $0.06 per share to Don Swartz, a non- related party for $20,000.

On October 31, 2015, the Company issued 100,000 shares at $0.10 Canadian per share to Shawn Rich, a non-related party for $10,000 Canadian.

On December 10, 2015, the Company issued 16,500,000 shares at $0.10 per share to Engaged Mobility LLC, a related company, for the purchase of Good2Drive LLC.

On December 18, 2015, the Company issued 25,000 shares at $0.13 Canadian per share to Bob Fisher, a non-related party, for $3,250 Canadian; 25,000 shares at $0.13 Canadian per share to Lynda Fisher, a non-related party, for $3,250 Canadian.

There were 114,208,334 common shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2015.

All of the above securities were issued pursuant to an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 to sophisticated investors.

    Item 5(b)  Use of Proceeds.  Not applicable.

    Item 5(c)  Purchases of Equity Securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers.  

During 2015 and 2014, we repurchased no common shares.

10

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data.

We qualify as a smaller reporting company, as defined by Rule 229.10(f)(1) and are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 7.  Management’s Discussions and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Our Business - Overview

ARII is an operating company that provides consulting services to companies and individuals participating in the mining industry, manages actual mining operations and owns and sells smartphone Apps. We have conducted our mining operations in the Kirkland Lake region of Ontario, Canada,

Plan of Operation

Our plan of operation for the next twelve months is to expand our client base to the extent that we pursue the corporate advisory market in the mining sector and continue to acquire mining claims, run geophysical testing, core drilling, analysis and assays to determine proven reserves appropriate steps to take in actual mining processes.  We will also develop international marketing and sales strategies for our Good2Drive App. As we continue to grow, we will need to raise additional funds. We do anticipate obtaining additional financing to fund operations through common stock offerings, to the extent available, or to obtain additional financing to the extent necessary to augment our working capital. We do not have need for the purchase of any property or equipment at this time. ARII will not have any significant changes in the current number of employees.

Our plan of operation for the next twelve months is to raise capital to continue to expand our operations.  We would most likely rely upon the transaction exemptions from registration provided by Regulation D, Rule 506 or conduct another private offering under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.  

In order to continue as a going concern, we will need, among other things, additional capital resources.  Management’s plan to obtain such resources include, obtaining capital from management and significant stockholders sufficient to meet its minimal operating expenses.  However, management cannot provide any assurance that we will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.

12 Month Growth Strategy and Milestones

While a strategic and wisely executed marketing campaign is key to expanding our customer base; providing innovative strategies developed and implemented for our clients and customers, will provide a solid platform upon which our operations will continue to grow and deliver long-term success.

11

Note: The following milestones are based on our business development strategy.

Results of Consolidated Operations for the year ended December 31, 2015 and for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Consolidated Revenues

The Company had no revenues during the year ended December 31, 2015 or for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Consolidated Operating Expenses

Total Expenses.  Total operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $254,492 and $163,355 for the year ended December 31, 2014. Total operating expenses consisted of stock based compensation of $6,550 and $32,500, respectively; exploration costs of $194,690 and $2,000, respectively; professional fees of $45,216 and $128,850, respectively; selling, general and administrative of $8,036 and $5, respectively.

Other expenses consist of interest expense of $28,424 and $20,276, respectively and foreign exchange (gain) loss of $2,088 and $-0-, respectively. The increase in total expenses was primarily due to increased exploration costs from soil and core sampling in the mining property.

12

Consolidated Financial Condition

Total Assets.  Total assets were $176,593 and 1,693 at December 31, 2015 and 2014.  Total assets at December 31, 2015 and 2014 consisted of cash of $8,477; $1,693, respectively; prepaid expense of $3,894 and $-0-, respectively; and investments of $9,222 and $-0- respectively; and intangible asset of $155,000 and $-0- respectively.  Total assets were due to cash received via subscription agreements and a consulting contract. The prepaid expense was due to a legal retainer payment. The investment was due to purchased mineral rights of $9,222 and the intangible asset was due to the acquisition of an application company, Good2Drive LLC of $155,000.

Total Liabilities. Total liabilities were $635,842 and $269,799 at December 31, 2015 and 2014. Total liabilities at December 31, 2015 and 2014 consisted of accounts payable of $290,702 and $36,400, respectively; note payable of $276,984 and $202,300, respectively; due to related party of $8,803 and accrued interest of $59,353 and $31,099, respectively.  Total liabilities were due to the promissory note related to consulting contracts, exploration costs and a payable associated with the preparation of the S1 registration statement.

Consolidated Liquidity and Capital Resources

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern which contemplates, among other things, the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business.

The Company sustained a loss for the year ending December 31, 2015 of $285,004.  The Company had an accumulated loss of $621,522 as of December 31, 2015.  Because of the absence of positive cash flows from operations, the Company will require additional funding for continuing the development and marketing of services.  These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

We are presently unable to meet our obligations as they come due. At December 31, 2015 we had working capital deficit of $623,471. Our working capital deficit is due to the results of operations.

Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 was ($97,704) and ($7,005) for the year ended December 31, 2014.  Net cash used in operating activities includes our net loss, stock issued for services, prepaid expense, accounts payable and accrued interest.

13

Net cash provided for financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $115,798 and $2,500 for the year ended December 31, 2014.  Net cash used for financing activities included proceeds from related party of $8,803 and $-0-, respectively, proceeds from notes payable of $74,684 and $2,500, respectively and proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $32,311 and $-0-, respectively.

Net cash provided for investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $(9,222) and $-0- for the year ended December 31, 2014.  

We anticipate that our future liquidity requirements will arise from the need to fund our growth from operations, pay current obligations and future capital expenditures. The primary sources of funding for such requirements are expected to be cash generated from operations and raising additional funds from the private sources and/or debt financing.  However, we can provide no assurances that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations and/or obtain additional financing on terms satisfactory to us, if at all, to remain a going concern. Our continuation as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our obligations on a timely basis and ultimately to attain profitability.  Our plan of operation for the next twelve months is to raise capital to continue to expand our operations. Although we are not presently engaged in any capital raising activities, we anticipate that we may engage in one or more private offering of our company’s securities after the completion of this offering.  We would most likely rely upon the transaction exemptions from registration provided by Regulation D, Rule 506 or conduct another private offering under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.  In order to continue as a going concern, we will need, among other things, additional capital resources.  Management’s plan to obtain such resources include, obtaining capital from management and significant stockholders sufficient to meet its minimal operating expenses.  However, management cannot provide any assurance that we will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.

We are not aware of any trends or known demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that will result in or that are reasonably likely to result in material increases or decreases in liquidity.

Capital Resources.

We had no material commitments for capital expenditures as of December 31, 2015.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have made no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our consolidated financial condition, changes in consolidates financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

14

Item 7a.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable.

15

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Atacama Resources International, Inc.

Index to

Financial Statements

16

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Atacama Resources International, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Atacama Resources International, Inc. as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ deficiency, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.  

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Atacama Resources International, Inc. as of  December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has significant net losses and cash flow deficiencies.  Those conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  Management’s plans regarding those matters are described in Note 2.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Stevenson & Company CPAS LLC

Stevenson & Company CPAS LLC

Tampa, Florida

April 19, 2016

17

ATACAMA RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

December 31, 2015 and 2014

Consolidated Balance Sheets

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

18

ATACAMA RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

For the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014

Consolidated Statements of Operations

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

19

ATACAMA RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Consolidated Statements Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit

For the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

20

ATACAMA RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

For the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

21

Atacama Resources International, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014

NOTE 1. NATURE OF BUSINESS

ORGANIZATION

Atacama Resources International, Inc., f/k/a Arrakis Mining Research, Inc. (hereinafter “the Company”) is a company incorporated in the State of Florida in June 2013. We were originally formed as a consultant to the mining industry.  The mining industry is subject to constant change due to market trends, thereby making it extremely competitive. The mining industry is complex, because several segments are regulated by both federal and state governments. ARII’s approach assists general business operations with the growth and development, international expansion and marketing aspects of their business, allowing our potential customers to focus on the business aspects of operations. By using the services provided by ARII, our clients are free to focus on compliance with regulations within their industry, and to complete their primary business goals.

During the year, Atacama Resources International Inc. purchase 100% of Good2Drive LLC, a smartphone application company that establishes a baseline to test driver’s alertness. The acquisition includes the rights to two filed patent applications. The financial operations of Good2Drive LLC have been consolidated in the December 31, 2015 audited financial statements of Atacama Resources International Inc.

NOTE 2. GOING CONCERN

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.  The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating cost and allow it to continue as a going concern.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable.  If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations.

In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources.  Management’s plan to obtain such resources for the Company include, obtaining capital from management and significant stockholders sufficient to meet its minimal operating expenses.  However, management cannot provide any assurance that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.

22

There is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain sufficient additional funds when needed or that such funds, if available, will be obtainable on terms satisfactory to the Company.  In addition, profitability will ultimately depend upon the level of revenues received from business operations.  However, there is no assurance that the Company will attain profitability. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern

NOTE 3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

FINANICAL STATEMENTS

The accompanying audited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring entries necessary for a fair statement of the periods presented for: (a) the financial position; (b) the result of operations; and (c) cash flows, have been made in order to make the consolidated financial statements presented not misleading. The results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of operations for a full year.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND USE OF ESTIMATES

The Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"), which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition to be cash equivalents.  Cash and cash equivalents totaled $8,477 at December 31, 2015 and $1,693 at December 31, 2014.

CASH FLOWS REPORTING

The Company follows ASC 230, Statement of Cash Flows, for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by ASC 230, Statement of Cash Flows, to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income

23

that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period.

EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS

Costs of acquiring mining properties and any exploration and development costs are expensed as incurred unless proven and probable reserves exist and the property is a commercially mineable property in accordance with FASB ASC 930, Extractive Activities – Mining.  Mine development costs incurred either to develop new gold and silver deposits, expand the capacity of operating mines, or to develop mine areas substantially in advance of current production are capitalized.  Costs incurred to maintain current production or to maintain assets on a standby basis are charged to operations.  Costs of abandoned projects are charged to operations upon abandonment.  The Company evaluates at least quarterly, the carrying value of capitalized mining costs and related property, plant and equipment costs, if any, to determine if these costs are in excess of their net realizable value and if a permanent impairment needs to be recorded.  The periodic evaluation of carrying value of capitalized costs and any related property, plant and equipment costs are based upon expected future cash flows and/or estimated salvage value.

The Company capitalizes costs for mining properties by individual property and defers such costs for later amortization only if the prospects for economic productions are reasonably certain.

Capitalized costs are expensed in the period when the termination has been made that economic production does not appear reasonably certain.

During the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company recorded exploration costs of $194,690 and $2,000, respectively.

RELATED PARTIES

The Company follows ASC 850, “Related Party Disclosures,” for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.  Related party transactions are summarized in Note 7.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company’s balance sheet includes certain financial instruments. The carrying amounts of current assets and current liabilities approximate their fair value because of the relatively short period of time between the origination of these instruments and their expected realization.

24

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities

Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3 - Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company follows ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned.  The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

The Company derives revenue from consulting arrangements with clients.  Revenue is generated by hourly fee structure or fixed contract costs, based on expected time to complete, additionally, costs incurred may be billed, as defined by the contractual arrangements.  

25

DEFERRED INCOME TAXES AND VALUATION ALLOWANCE

The Company accounts for income taxes under ASC 740, Income Taxes.  Under the asset and liability method of ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period the enactment occurs.  A valuation allowance is provided for certain deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize tax assets through future operations.  No deferred tax assets or liabilities were recognized as of December 31, 2015 or December 31, 2014.

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

Net income (loss) per share is calculated in accordance with ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share.”  The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period is used to compute basic earning or loss per share.  Diluted earnings or loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares and diluted potential common shares outstanding.  Dilutive potential common shares are additional common shares assumed to be exercised.

Basic net income (loss) per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.  As of December 31, 2015, the Company had no dilutive potential common shares.

SHARE-BASED EXPENSE

ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, prescribes accounting and reporting standards for all share-based payment transactions in which employee services are acquired.  Transactions include incurring liabilities, or issuing or offering to issue shares, options, and other equity instruments such as employee stock ownership plans and stock appreciation rights.  Share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized as compensation expense in the consolidated financial statements based on their fair values. That expense is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award, known as the requisite service period (usually the vesting period).

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation issued to non-employees and consultants in accordance with the provisions of ASC 505-50, Equity – Based Payments to Non-Employees.  Measurement of share-based payment transactions with non-employees is based on the fair value of whichever is more reliably measurable:  (a) the goods or services received; or (b) the equity instruments issued.  The fair value of the share-based payment transaction is determined at the earlier of performance commitment date or performance completion date.  

26

Share-based expense was $6,550 for the year ended December 31, 2015 and $32,500 for the ended December 31, 2014.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws and a limited number of grandfathered standards, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (“ASC”) is the sole source of authoritative GAAP literature recognized by the FASB and applicable to the Company.  Management has reviewed the aforementioned rules and releases and believes any effect will not have a material impact on the Company's present or future financial statements.

We have reviewed the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU 2014-10”) and have applied the standard as of the dates during the periods reported.

We have reviewed the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU 2014-9”).  The Company does not believe that the new or modified principal will not have a material effect on these financial statements.

We have reviewed the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) accounting pronouncements and interpretations thereof that have effectiveness dates during the periods reported and in future periods. The Company has carefully considered the new pronouncements that alter previous generally accepted accounting principles and does not believe that any new or modified principles will have a material impact on the corporation’s reported financial position or operations in the near term. The applicability of any standard is subject to the formal review of our financial management and certain standards are under consideration.

NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES

At December 31, 2015, the Company had a net operating loss carry–forward for Federal income tax purposes of approximately $621,522 that may be offset against future taxable income through 2032  No tax benefit has been reported with respect to these net operating loss carry-forwards in the accompanying financial statements because the Company believes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets   calculated at the effective rates note below, was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are fully offset by the valuation allowance.

Deferred tax assets consist primarily of the tax effect of NOL carry-forwards. The Company has provided a full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets because of the uncertainty regarding its realizability.

27

The Company’s tax expense differs from the “expected” tax expense for Federal income tax purposes (computed by applying the United States Federal tax rate of 34% and State tax rate of 3.6% to income before taxes), as follows:

The tax effects of the temporary differences between reportable financial statement income and taxable income are recognized as deferred tax assets and liabilities.

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.  The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.  Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.

For the period ending December 31, 2015 and for the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company has net operating losses from operations. The carry forwards expire through the year 2032. The Company’s net operating loss carry forward may be subject to annual limitations, which could reduce or defer the utilization of the losses as a result of an ownership change as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. A valuation allowance has been applied due to the uncertainty of realization.

The Company’s net deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 is as follows:

The Company is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service for the period from inception ended December 31, 2013 through the year ended December 31, 2015.  The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to income taxes in income tax expense. The Company had incurred no penalties and interest through the year ended December 31, 2015.

28

NOTE 5. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

The Company, through approval of its Board of Directors, authorized common shares of 500,000,000 with a par value of $0.0001.

COMMON STOCK

On March 24, 2014, the Company issued 325,000 shares, at $0.10 per share, to Soellingen Advisory Group, Inc., a non-related party, in exchange for consulting services totaling $32,500.   

In August 2014, the Board of Directors cancelled 12 million shares that were issued in anticipation of services to be performed. The following shares were cancelled due to non-performance.  The shares were originally issued at par $0.0001.

1. Foster Smith  6,000,000

2. Bruce Hartley  2,000,000

3. Gerald Ernst  2,000,000

4. Kavita Khandelwal  2,000,000

On August 29, 2014, the Company issued at $0.0001 per share 1,200,000 shares to Ken Olsen, Former CEO and director, 2,098,600 shares to Glenn Grant, CEO and director, 125,000 shares to Raymond Skaff, director, 1,648,840 shares to Nelson Riis, advisor and 6,927,560 shares to other non-related parties that have been instrumental in the progress of the company for services rendered.  The Company issued a total of 12 million shares at par value of $0.0001 per share for consulting services totaling $1,200.

On August 7, 2015, the Company issued at $0.0001 per share 12,000,000 shares to 1172321 Alberta Ltd., a related party, 12,000,000 shares to BOWER Solutions, a related party, 8,400,000 shares to Daniel Finch, COO and director, and on September 21, 2015, 10,000,000 shares to Richard Roy, CFO and director for services that have been instrumental in the progress of the company.

On August 7, 2015, the Company issued at $0.0001 per share 12,000,000 shares to 1778928 Alberta Ltd., a related party, 2,400,000 shares to Nelson Riis, advisor, 2,400,000 shares to Arnold Allsopp, advisor and 2,400,000 shares to Seal River Exploration Ltd., a non-related party, and on September 21, 2015, 3,600,000 shares to Dianne Finch, a related party, and 300,000 shares to Tammy Kaleta, a non-related party for exchange of services instrumental to the progress of the company.

On September 21, 2015, the Company issued 333,333 shares at $0.06 per share to Don Swartz, a non- related party for $20,000.

29

On October 31, 2015, the Company issued 100,000 shares at $0.10 Canadian per share to Shawn Rich, a non-related party for $10,000 Canadian.

On December 18, 2015, the Company issued 25,000 shares at $0.13 Canadian per share to Bob Fisher, a non-related party, for $3,250 Canadian; 25,000 shares at $0.13 Canadian per share to Lynda Fisher, a non-related party, for $3,250 Canadian.

On December 10, 2015, the Company issued 16,500,000 shares at $0.00939 per share to Engaged Mobility LLC, a related company, for the purchase of Good2Drive LLC.

There were 114,208,334 shares of common stock issued and outstanding at December 31, 2015.

NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

DUE TO RELATED PARTY

During the year ended December 31, 2015, Glenn Grant, CEO and director paid certain expenses on behalf of the Company and is due reimbursement travel expenses.  As of December 31, 2015 the balance due to related party was $8,803.

NOTE PAYABLE

On December 4, 2014, Glenn Grant, advisor to the Company executed a demand note with the Company.  The note carries an Eight percent (8%) annual percentage rate.  The balance of the related party note as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were $77,104 and $2,500, respectively.

INTANGIBLE ASSET

During the year, the Company purchased 100% of Good2Drive LLC in exchange for cash and common stock of Atacama Resources International Inc. The total cost of the acquisition is $155,000. The negotiation and acquisition was directed by Dan Finch, COO of Atacama Resources International Inc., who held a five (5%) interest in Good2Drive LLC.

EQUITY TRANSACTIONS

On August 29, 2014 through approval of its Board of Directors, the Company issued 2,098,600 shares at $0.05 per share to Glen Grant, CEO and director in exchange for services totaling $104,930.

30

On August 7, 2015 through approval of its Board of Directors, the Company issued at par value $0.0001 the followings shares to related parties for exchange of services instrumental to the progress of the company:

1172321 Alberta Ltd.                     12,000,000 shares

1778928 Alberta Ltd.                     12,000,000 shares

Bower Solutions Ltd.                     12,000,000 shares

Daniel Finch (COO and director)  8,400,000 shares

 On September 21, 2015 through approval of its Board of Directors, the Company issued at par value $0.0001  3,600,000 shares to Dianne Finch and 10,000,000 shares to Richard Roy, CFO and director  for exchange of services instrumental to the progress of the company.

NOTE 7. NOTES PAYABLE

NOTE 8. PREPAID EXPENSE

The Company paid the law offices of Clifford J. Hunt, P.A. $2,250 retainer.  The prepaid balance was $3,894 and $-0-, on December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.     

31

NOTE 9.  INVESTMENTS

NOTE 10.  INTANGIBLE ASSETS

On December 10, 2015, the Company purchased Good2Drive LLC. from Engaged Mobility LLC for a cost of $155,000. The purchase was made by issuing 16,500,000 shares of Atacama International Resources Inc. at $0.00939 per share. Good2Drive, which also includes Good2Roll and Good2Pilot, is a smartphone application that establishes a baseline to test driver’s alertness.

NOTE 11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

From time to time, the Company may be a party to litigation matters involving claims against the Company.   Management believes that there are no current matters that would have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 12. WARRANTS AND OPTIONS

There are no warrants or options outstanding to acquire any additional shares of common stock of the Company as of December 31, 2015.

NOTE 13. SUBSEQUENT AND SIGNIGICANT EVENTS

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:

Management has evaluated subsequent events through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued.

The Company has entered into negotiations with a group of companies to purchase the exclusive license to nanotechnology developed by SolRayo for the purpose of improving lithium-ion battery technologies (“Nanotech”); as well as the developed technologies related to radio frequency identification (“RFID”) tags.

32

The Company received approval from FINRA to use the Company’s new stock symbol: ACRL and has full reporting status with the SEC. Shares in ACRL will be listed on the OTC Markets website as Pink Current Information until it eventually moves to the OTCQB.

As of April 12, 2016, the Company has issued 466,667 of additional common stock for $30,000. Therefore, the total amount of common stock issued and outstanding as of April 12, 2016 is 114,775,001.

NOTE 14. CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING ESTIMATE

At December 31, 2014, the Company issued 12,000,000 common shares to various stockholders in lieu of cash for services instrumental to the progress of the Company. Since the Company at the time had no market for the stock and the Company is currently not trading, the valuation was deemed to be overstated. As a result, the issued common shares were restated at par, $0.001 per share.

33

Item 9.  Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants On Accounting And Financial Disclosure

1) Previous Independent Auditors:

On July 1, 2015, the Company dismissed DKM Certified Public Accountant (“DKM”) as their registered independent public accountant.  On July 1, 2015, the Company engaged Stevenson & Company CPAS LLC (“Stevenson”) as its new registered independent public accountant.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, DKM’s report did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to audit scope or accounting principles, except that the report contained an explanatory paragraph stating that there was substantial doubt about the registrant’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The decision to dismiss DKM and to engage Stevenson was approved by the Company’s board of directors.

Through the period covered by the financial audit for the year ended December 31, 2014 there have been no disagreements with DKM on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements if not resolved to the satisfaction of DKM would have caused them to make reference thereto in their report on the financial statements.  For the interim period through July 1, 2015 (the date of dismissal), there have been no disagreements with DKM on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements if not resolved to the satisfaction of DKM would have caused them to make reference thereto in their report on the financial statements.

During the year ended December 31, 2014 and the interim period through July 1, 2015, there have been no reportable events between the registrant and DKM as set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

2) New Independent Accountants:

On July 1, 2015, the Company engaged Stevenson & Company CPAS LLC, as its new registered independent public accountant.  During the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 and prior to July 1, 2015 (the date of the new engagement), we did not consult with Stevenson regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, (ii) the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements by Stevenson, in either case where written or oral advice provided by Stevenson would be an important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issues or (iii) any other matter that was the subject of a disagreement between us and our former auditor or was a reportable event (as described in Items 304(a)(1)(iv) or Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K, respectively).

34

Item 9a.  Controls and Procedures