Attached files
Grant Thornton
An instinct for growth
Exhibit 34.1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC
We have examined Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC's ("MBFS USA LLC" or the "Company")
compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for United States Consumer Automotive Retail Installment Sale Contracts
(the "Platform") described in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable
Servicing Criteria of Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC ("Management's Report") as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2015, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(v),
1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii), and
1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the
Company with respect to the Platform. The Platform consists of the asset-backed transactions and
securities defined by management in Appendix A of Management's Report. Management is responsible for
the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express opinion
on the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform based on our
examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the
Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected
asset-backed transactions and securities constituting the Platform and evaluating whether the Company
performed servicing activities related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our testing may not have included
servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further,
our examination was not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to the
period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's servicing activities during the
period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.
As described in Management's Report, the Company engaged various vendors to perform servicing
activities with respect to criteria 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(4)(i), 1122(d)(4)(ii) and 1122(d)(4)(viii). The
Company determined that each vendor is not considered a "servicer," as that term is defined in Item
1101(j) of Regulation AB, and therefore, the Company is assuming responsibility for compliance with such
servicing criteria applicable to each vendor's servicing activities. In accordance with Regulation AB and its
related interpretations, the requirement for management to assess compliance with the servicing criteria
applicable to a vendor's activities is satisfied if the Company has instituted policies and procedures to
monitor whether such vendor's activities comply in all material respects with such criteria. Compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria is achieved if those policies and procedures are designed to provide
reasonable assurance that such vendor's activities comply with such criteria and those policies and
procedures are operating effectively for the period covered by Management's Report. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination of whether a vendor is or is not considered a servicer, and
therefore, on whether the Company, in its Management Report, is eligible to elect to take responsibility for
assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor's servicing activities.
Our examination disclosed the following material noncompliance with 1122(d)(4)(vii) applicable to the
Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for the Platform.
1.
With respect to servicing criterion 1122(d)(4)(vii), MBFS USA LLC failed to send a post-repo notice
within two days or repossession of a vehicle for one account.
In our opinion, except for the material noncompliance described in the preceding paragraph, Mercedes-
Benz Financial Services USA LLC complied, in all material respects, with the aforementioned applicable
servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for the United States Consumer
Automotive Retail Installment Sales Contracts.
The information included in the Management Response section of Appendix B of Management's Report is
presented by the Company to provide additional information and is not a part of the Company's servicing
criteria. The information in the Management Response section of Appendix B has not been subject to the
procedures applied in the examination of compliance with applicable servicing criteria, and accordingly, we
express no opinion on it.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Southfield, Michigan
March 22, 2016