Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-31 - TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT | c83757_ex31.htm |
EX-32 - TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT | c83757_ex32.htm |
EX-14 - TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT | c83757_ex14.htm |
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 33-92990; 333-202583
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
NEW YORK
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
NOT APPLICABLE
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
C/O TEACHERS INSURANCE AND
ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
730 THIRD AVENUE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017-3206
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (212) 490-9000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
YES o NO x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act:
YES o NO x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 or regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K: Not Applicable
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer x |
Smaller Reporting Company o |
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES o NO x
Aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates: Not Applicable
Documents Incorporated by Reference: None
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Item |
|
|
Page |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Business |
|
|
3 |
|||||||
|
Risk Factors |
|
|
9 |
|||||||
|
Unresolved Staff Comments. |
|
|
24 |
|||||||
|
Properties |
|
|
24 |
|||||||
|
Legal Proceedings |
|
|
33 |
|||||||
|
Mine Safety Disclosures |
|
|
33 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Market for Registrants Securities, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
|
|
34 |
|||||||
|
Selected Financial Data |
|
|
35 |
|||||||
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Accounts Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
|
|
37 |
|||||||
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
|
|
65 |
|||||||
|
Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
|
|
67 |
|||||||
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
|
|
107 |
|||||||
|
Controls and Procedures |
|
|
107 |
|||||||
|
Other Information |
|
|
107 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance of the Registrant; Executive Compensation |
|
|
108 |
|||||||
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
|
|
110 |
|||||||
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
|
|
110 |
|||||||
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
|
|
110 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Exhibits and Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules |
|
|
112 |
|||||||
|
|
113 |
2
General. The TIAA Real Estate Account (the Real Estate Account, the Account or the Registrant) was established on February 22, 1995, as an insurance company separate account of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (TIAA), a New York insurance company, by resolution of TIAAs Board of Trustees (the Board). The Account, which invests mainly in real estate and real estate-related investments, is a variable annuity investment option offered through individual, group and tax-deferred annuity contracts available to employees in the academic, medical, cultural and research fields. The Account commenced operations on July 3, 1995, and interests in the Account were first offered to eligible participants on October 2, 1995.
The Account offers individual and group accumulating annuity contracts (with contributions made on a pre-tax or after-tax basis), as well as individual lifetime and term-certain variable payout annuity contracts (including the payment of death benefits to beneficiaries). Investors are entitled to transfer funds to or from the Account under certain circumstances. Funds invested in the Account for each category of contract are expressed in terms of units, and unit values will fluctuate depending on the Accounts performance.
The Account is regulated by the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS), and the insurance departments of certain other jurisdictions in which the annuity contracts are offered. Although TIAA owns the assets of the Real Estate Account, and the Accounts obligations are obligations of TIAA, the Accounts income, investment gains, and investment losses are credited to or charged against the assets of the Account without regard to TIAAs other income, gains, or losses. Under New York insurance law, the Account cannot be charged with liabilities incurred by any other TIAA business activities or any other TIAA separate account.
The Real Estate Account is designed as an option for retirement and tax-deferred savings plans for employees of non-profit and governmental institutions. TIAA currently offers the Real Estate Account under the following annuity contracts:
|
RAs and GRAs (Retirement Annuities and Group Retirement Annuities) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SRAs (Supplemental Retirement Annuities) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GSRAs (Group Supplemental Retirement Annuities) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Retirement Choice and Retirement Choice Plus Annuities |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GAs (Group Annuities) and Institutionally Owned GSRAs |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Classic and Roth IRAs (Individual Retirement Annuities) including SEP IRAs (Simplified Employee Pension Plans) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Keoghs |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATRAs (After-Tax Retirement Annuities) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Real Estate Account Accumulation Contract |
Note that state regulatory approval may be pending for certain of these contracts and these contracts may not currently be available in every state. TIAA may also offer the Real Estate Account as an investment option under additional contracts, both at the individual and plan sponsor level, in the future.
Investment Objective. The Real Estate Account seeks favorable long-term returns primarily through rental income and appreciation of real estate and real estate-related investments owned by the Account. The Account will also invest in non-real estate-related publicly traded securities and short-term higher quality liquid investments that are easily converted to cash to enable the Account to meet participant redemption requests, purchase or improve properties, or cover other expense needs.
Investment Strategy
Real Estate-Related Investments. The Account intends to have between 75% and 85% of its net assets invested directly in real estate or real estate-related investments with the goal of producing favorable long-term returns primarily through rental income and appreciation. These investments may consist of:
3
|
Direct ownership interests in real estate; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Direct ownership of real estate through interests in joint ventures; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Indirect interests in real estate through real estate-related securities, such as: |
|
public and/or privately placed registered and unregistered equity investments in real estate investment trusts (REITs), which investments may consist of registered or unregistered common or preferred stock interests; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
real estate limited partnerships and limited liability companies; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
investments in equity or debt securities of companies whose operations involve real estate (i.e., that primarily own or manage real estate) which may not be REITs; and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
conventional commercial mortgage loans, participating mortgage loans, secured mezzanine loans and collateralized mortgage obligations, including commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) and other similar investments. |
The Accounts principal strategy is to purchase direct ownership interests in income-producing real estate, primarily office, industrial, retail and multi-family properties. The Account is targeted to hold between 65% and 80% of the Accounts net assets in such direct ownership interests at any time. Historically, at least 70% of the Accounts net assets have comprised such direct ownership interests in real estate.
In addition, while the Account is authorized to hold up to 25% of its net assets in liquid real estate-related securities, such as publicly traded REITs and CMBS, management intends that the Account will not hold more than 10% of its net assets in such securities on a long-term basis. Traditionally, less than 10% of the Accounts net assets have comprised interests in these securities; although, the Account has held approximately 10% of its net assets in equity REIT securities at times. In addition, under the Accounts current investment guidelines, the Account is authorized to hold up to 10% of its net assets in CMBS. As of December 31, 2015, REIT securities comprised approximately 4.6% of the Accounts net assets, and the Account held no CMBS as of such date.
Non-Real Estate-Related Investments. The Account will invest the remaining portion of its assets (targeted to be between 15% and 25% of its net assets) in publicly traded, liquid investments; namely:
|
Short-term government related instruments, including U.S. Treasury bills; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Long-term government related instruments, such as securities issued by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government sponsored entities; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Short-term non-government related instruments, such as money market instruments and commercial paper; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Long-term non-government related instruments, such as corporate debt securities; and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock of companies that do not primarily own or manage real estate. |
However, from time to time, the Accounts non-real estate-related liquid investments may comprise less than 15% (and possibly less than 10%) of its assets (on a net basis and/or a gross basis), especially during and immediately following periods of significant net participant outflows, in particular due to significant participant transfer activity. In addition, the Account, from time to time and on a temporary basis, may hold in excess of 25% of its net assets in non-real estate-related liquid investments, particularly during times of significant inflows into the Account and/or a lack of attractive real estate-related investments available in the market.
Liquid Securities Generally. Primarily due to managements need to manage fluctuations in cash flows, in particular during and immediately following periods of significant participant net transfer activity into or out of the Account, the Account may, on a temporary basis (i) exceed the upper end of its targeted holdings (currently 35% of the Accounts net assets) in liquid securities of all types, including both publicly traded non-real estate-related liquid investments and liquid real estate-related securities, such as REITs and CMBS, or (ii) be below the low end of its targeted holdings in such liquid securities (currently 15% of the Accounts net assets).
The portion of the Accounts net assets invested in liquid investments of all types may exceed the upper end of its target, for example, if (i) the Account receives a large inflow of money in a short period of time, in
4
particular due to significant participant transfer activity into the Account, (ii) the Account receives significant proceeds from sales or financings of direct real estate assets, (iii) there is a lack of attractive direct real estate investments available on the market, and/or (iv) the Account anticipates more near-term cash needs, including to apply to acquire direct real estate investments, pay expenses or repay indebtedness.
Foreign Investments. The Account from time to time will also make foreign real estate investments. Under the Accounts investment guidelines, investments in direct foreign real estate, together with foreign real estate-related securities and foreign non-real estate related liquid investments may not comprise more than 25% of the Accounts net assets. However, through the date of this report, such foreign real estate-related investments have never represented more than 7.5% of the Accounts net assets and management does not intend such foreign investments to exceed 10% of the Accounts net assets. As of December 31, 2015, the Account did not hold any foreign real estate investments.
Investments Summary: At December 31, 2015, the Accounts net assets totaled $22.4 billion. As of that date, the Accounts investments in real estate properties, real estate joint ventures, limited partnerships, a loan receivable and real estate-related marketable securities, net of the fair value of mortgage loans payable on real estate, represented 81.2% of the Accounts net assets.
At December 31, 2015, the Account held a total of 123 real estate investments (including its interests in 19 real estate-related joint ventures), representing 77.4% of the Accounts total investments, measured on a gross asset value basis (Total Investments). As of that date, the Account also held investments in REIT equity securities (representing 4.2% of Total Investments), real estate limited partnerships (representing 0.6% of Total Investments), government agency notes (representing 11.0% of Total Investments), U.S. Treasury securities (representing 6.4% of Total Investments) and a loan receivable (representing 0.4% of Total Investments). See the Accounts audited consolidated financial statements for more information as to the Accounts investments as of December 31, 2015.
Borrowing: The Account is authorized to borrow money and assume or obtain a mortgage on a propertyi.e., make leveraged real estate investments. Under the Accounts current investment guidelines, management intends to maintain the Accounts loan to value ratio (as defined below) at or below 30% (measured at the time of incurrence and after giving effect thereto). Forms of borrowing may include:
|
placing new debt on properties, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
refinancing outstanding debt, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
assuming debt on the Accounts properties, or |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
extending the maturity date of outstanding debt. |
The Accounts loan to value ratio at any time is based on the ratio of the outstanding principal amount of the Accounts debt to the Accounts total gross asset value. The Accounts total gross asset value, for these purposes, is equal to the total fair value of the Accounts assets (including the fair value of the Accounts interest in joint ventures), with no reduction associated with any indebtedness on such assets. In calculating outstanding indebtedness, we include only the Accounts actual percentage interest in any borrowings on a joint venture investment and not that of any joint venture partner. Also, at the time the Account (or a joint venture in which the Account is a partner) enters into a revolving line of credit, management deems the maximum amount which may be drawn under that line of credit as fully incurred, regardless of whether the maximum amount available has been drawn from time to time.
As of December 31, 2015, the aggregate principal amount of the Accounts outstanding debt (including the Accounts share of debt on its joint venture investments) was $3.4 billion and the Accounts loan to value ratio was approximately 12.8%.
In times of high net inflow activity, in particular during times of high net participant transfer inflows, management may determine to apply a portion of such cash flows to make prepayments of indebtedness prior to scheduled maturity, which would have the effect of reducing the Accounts loan to value ratio. Such prepayments may require the Account to pay fees or yield maintenance amounts to lenders.
In addition, the Account may obtain a line of credit to meet short-term cash needs, if needed. Management expects the proceeds from any such short-term borrowing would be used to meet the cash flow needs of the Accounts properties and real estate-related investments.
5
The Account may only borrow up to 70% of the then current value of a property, although construction loans may be for 100% of costs incurred in developing the property. Except for construction loans, any mortgage loans on a property will be non-recourse to the Account, meaning that if there is a default on a loan in respect of a specific property, the lender will have recourse to (i.e., be able to foreclose on) only the property encumbered (or the joint venture owning the property), or to other specific Account properties that may have been pledged as security for the defaulted loan, but not to any other assets of the Account. When possible, the Account will seek to have loans mature at varying times to limit the risks of borrowing.
Risk Factors. The Accounts assets and income can be affected by a variety of risk factors. These risks are more fully described under Item 1A of this Report and in the Accounts prospectus (as supplemented from time to time).
Personnel and Management. The Account has no officers, directors or employees. TIAA employees, under the direction and control of TIAAs Board of Trustees (the Board) and its Investment Committee, manage the investment of the Accounts assets, following investment management procedures TIAA has adopted for the Account. In addition, TIAA performs administration functions for the Account (which includes receiving and allocating premiums, calculating and making annuity payments and providing recordkeeping and other services). Distribution services for the Account (which include, without limitation, distribution of the annuity contracts, advising existing annuity contract owners in connection with their accumulations and helping employers implement and manage retirement plans) are performed by TIAA-CREF Individual & Institutional Services, LLC (Services), a wholly owned subsidiary of TIAA and registered broker-dealer and member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). TIAA and Services provide investment advisory, administration, and distribution services, as applicable, to the Account on an at-cost basis.
Contracts. TIAA offers the Account as a variable option for the annuity contracts listed earlier in this Item 1, although some employer plans may not offer the Account as an option for certain contracts. Each payment to the Account buys a number of accumulation units. Similarly, any transfer or withdrawal from the Account results in the redemption of a number of accumulation units. The price paid for an accumulation unit, and the price received for an accumulation unit when redeemed, is the accumulation unit value (AUV) calculated for the business day on which the participants purchase, redemption or transfer request is received in good order (unless a participant asks for a later date for a redemption or transfer).
Subject to the terms of the contracts and a participants employers plan, a participant can move money to and from the Account in the following ways, among others:
|
from the Account to a CREF investment account, a TIAA Access variable account (if available), TIAAs Traditional Annuity or a fund (including TIAA-CREF affiliated funds) or other options available under the plan; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
to the Account from a CREF investment account, a TIAA Access variable account (if available), TIAAs Traditional Annuity (transfers from TIAAs Traditional Annuity under RA, GRA or Retirement Choice contracts are subject to restrictions), a TIAA-CREF affiliated fund or from other companies/ plans; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
by withdrawing cash; and/or |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
by setting up a program of automatic withdrawals or transfers. |
Importantly, transfers out of the Account to a TIAA or CREF account or into another investment option can be executed on any business day but are limited to once per calendar quarter, although some plans may allow systematic transfers that result in more than one transfer per calendar quarter. Other limited exceptions may apply. Also, transfers to CREF accounts or to certain other options may be restricted by an employers plan, current tax law or by the terms of a participants contract. In addition, individual participants are subject to certain limitations on making internal transfers into their Account accumulation if, after giving effect to such transfer, the total value of such participants Account accumulation (under all contracts issued to such participant) would exceed $150,000. Categories of transactions that TIAA deems internal funding vehicle transfers for purposes of this limitation are described in the applicable contract or endorsement form in the Accounts prospectus. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, all jurisdictions in which the Account is offered have approved this limitation, but the effective date of the limitation as applies to an individual participant will be reflected on his or her applicable contract or endorsement form. See the Accounts prospectus for more information.
6
Appraisals and Valuations. With respect to the Accounts real property investments, following the initial purchase of a property or the making of a mortgage loan on a property by the Account (at which time the Account normally receives an independent appraisal on such property), each of the Accounts real properties are appraised, and mortgage loans are valued, at least once every calendar quarter or sooner as circumstances arise. Each of the Accounts real estate properties are appraised each quarter by an independent third-party state-certified (or its foreign equivalent) appraiser (which we refer to in this report as an independent appraiser) who is a member of a professional appraisal organization. In addition, TIAAs internal appraisal staff performs a review of each of these quarterly appraisals, in conjunction with the Accounts independent fiduciary, and TIAAs internal appraisal staff or the independent fiduciary may request an additional appraisal or valuation outside of this quarterly cycle. Any differences in the conclusions of TIAAs internal appraisal staff and the independent appraiser will be reviewed by the independent fiduciary, which will make a final determination on the matter (which may include ordering a subsequent independent appraisal).
In general, the Account records appraisals of its real estate properties spread out throughout the quarter, which is intended to result in appraisal adjustments and thus adjustments to the valuations of its holdings (to the extent adjustments are made) happen regularly throughout each quarter and not on one specific day in each period. In addition, an estimated daily equivalent of net operating income is taken into consideration and is adjusted for actual transactional activity. The remaining assets in the Account are primarily marketable securities that are priced on a daily basis. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of the Accounts Financial Condition and Results of OperationsCritical Accounting Policies in this Form 10-K for more information on how each class of the Accounts investments are valued.
Liquidity Guarantee. The TIAA General Account provides the Account with a liquidity guarantee enabling the Account to have funds available to meet participant redemption, transfer or cash withdrawal requests. The Account pays TIAA for the risk associated with providing the liquidity guarantee through a daily deduction from the Accounts net assets. If the Account cannot fund participant requests from the Accounts own cash flow and liquid investments, the TIAA General Account will fund them by purchasing accumulation units issued by the Account (accumulation units that are purchased by TIAA are generally referred to as liquidity units). This liquidity guarantee is required by the NYDFS. TIAA guarantees that participants can redeem their accumulation units at the accumulation unit value next determined after their transfer or cash withdrawal request is received in good order. Liquidity units owned by TIAA are valued in the same manner as accumulation units owned by the Accounts participants.
This liquidity guarantee is not a guarantee of the investment performance of the Account or a guarantee of the value of a participants units. Primarily as a result of significant net participant transfers in the second half of 2008 and the first half of 2009, pursuant to this liquidity guarantee obligation, the TIAA General Account purchased an aggregate of $1.2 billion of liquidity units issued by the Account between December 2008 and June 2009. Since July 1, 2009 and through the date of filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K, no further liquidity units have been purchased.
Redemption of Liquidity Units. The independent fiduciary is vested with oversight and approval over any redemption of TIAAs liquidity units, acting in the best interests of Real Estate Account participants.
As of March 31, 2013, the independent fiduciary had completed the systematic redemption of all of the liquidity units held by the TIAA General Account. Approximately one-quarter of such units were redeemed evenly over the business days in each of the months of June, September and December 2012, and March 2013, representing a total of $940.3 million and $325.4 million redeemed during 2012 and 2013, respectively.
To the extent liquidity units are held by the TIAA General Account, the independent fiduciary reserves the right to authorize or direct the redemption of all or a portion of liquidity units at any time. Upon termination and liquidation of the Account (wind-up), any liquidity units held by TIAA will be the last units redeemed, unless the independent fiduciary directs otherwise.
Independent Fiduciary. Because TIAAs ability to purchase and sell liquidity units raises certain technical issues under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), TIAA applied for and received a prohibited transaction exemption from the U.S. Department of Labor in 1996 (PTE 96-76). In connection with the exemption, TIAA has appointed an independent fiduciary for the Account, with overall responsibility for reviewing the Accounts transactions to determine whether they are in accordance with the Accounts investment guidelines. RERC, LLC, a real estate consulting firm whose principal offices are located in West Des Moines, IA (RERC), was appointed as independent fiduciary effective March 1, 2006 and currently serves as the Accounts independent fiduciary, pursuant to an amended and restated letter
7
agreement effective March 1, 2015, whose term expires on February 28, 2018. The independent fiduciarys responsibilities include:
|
reviewing and approving the Accounts investment guidelines and monitoring whether the Accounts investments comply with those guidelines; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
reviewing and approving valuation procedures for the Accounts properties; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
approving adjustments to any property valuations that change the value of the property or the Account as a whole above or below certain prescribed levels, or that are made within three months of the annual independent appraisal; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
reviewing and approving how the Account values accumulation and annuity units; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
approving the appointment of all independent appraisers; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
reviewing the purchase and sale of units by TIAA to ensure that the Account uses the correct unit values; and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
requiring appraisals besides those normally conducted, if the independent fiduciary believes that any of the properties have changed materially, or that an additional appraisal is necessary to ensure the Account has correctly valued a property. |
In addition, the independent fiduciary has certain responsibilities with respect to the Account that it had historically undertaken or is currently undertaking with respect to TIAAs purchase and ownership of liquidity units, including among other things, reviewing the purchases and redemption of liquidity units by TIAA to ensure the Account uses the correct unit values. In connection therewith, as set forth in PTE 96-76, the independent fiduciarys responsibilities include:
|
establishing the percentage of total accumulation units that TIAAs ownership should not exceed (the trigger point) and creating a method for changing the trigger point; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
approving any adjustment of TIAAs ownership interest in the Account and, in its discretion, requiring an adjustment if TIAAs ownership of liquidity units reaches the trigger point; and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
once the trigger point has been reached, participating in any program to reduce TIAAs ownership in the Account by utilizing cash flow or liquid investments in the Account, or by utilizing the proceeds from asset sales. If the independent fiduciary were to determine that TIAAs ownership should be reduced following the trigger point, its role in participating in any asset sales program would include (i) participating in the selection of properties for sale, (ii) providing sales guidelines, and (iii) approving those sales if, in the independent fiduciarys opinion, such sales are desirable to reduce TIAAs ownership of liquidity units. |
Available Information. The Accounts annual report on Form 10-K, and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and any amendments to those reports, filed by the Account with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or after the date hereof, can be accessed free of charge at www.tiaa-cref.org. Information contained on this website is expressly not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
8
The value of your investment in the Account will fluctuate based on the value of the Accounts assets, the income the assets generate and the Accounts expenses. Participants can lose money by investing in the Account. There is risk associated with an investor attempting to time an investment in the Accounts units, or effecting a redemption of an investors units. The Accounts assets and income can be affected by many factors, and you should consider the specific risks presented below before investing in the Account. In particular, for a discussion of how forward-looking statements contained in this annual report on Form 10-K are subject to uncertainties that are difficult to predict, which may be beyond managements control and which could cause actual results to differ materially from historical experience or managements present expectations, please refer to the subsection entitled Forward-Looking Statements, which is contained in the section entitled Managements Discussion and Analysis of the Accounts Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH REAL ESTATE INVESTING
General Risks of Acquiring and Owning Real Property: As referenced elsewhere in this report, the substantial majority of the Accounts net assets consist of direct ownership interests in real estate. As such, the Account is particularly subject to the risks inherent in acquiring and owning real property, including in particular the following:
|
Adverse Global and Domestic Economic Conditions. The economic conditions in the markets where the Accounts properties are located may be adversely impacted by factors which include: |
|
adverse domestic or global economic conditions, particularly in the event of a deep recession which results in significant employment losses across many sectors of the economy and reduced levels of consumer spending; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
a weak market for real estate generally and/or in specific locations where the Account may own property; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
business closings, industry or sector slowdowns, employment losses and related factors; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
the availability of financing (both for the Account and potential purchasers of the Accounts properties); |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
an oversupply of, or a reduced demand for, certain types of real estate properties; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
natural disasters, flooding and other significant and severe weather-related events; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
terrorist attacks and/or other man-made events; and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
decline in population or shifting demographics. |
The incidence of some or all of these factors could reduce occupancy, rental rates and the fair value of the Accounts real properties or interests in investment vehicles (such as limited partnerships) which directly hold real properties.
|
Concentration Risk. The Account may experience periods in which its investments are geographically concentrated, either regionally or in certain markets with similar demographics. Further, while the Account seeks diversification across its four primary property types: office, industrial, retail and multi-family properties, the Account may experience periods where it has concentration in one property type, increasing the potential exposure if there were to be an oversupply of, or a reduced demand for, certain types of real estate properties in the markets in which the Account operates. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Also, the Account may experience periods in which its tenant base is concentrated within a particular industry sector. For example, the Account owns and operates a number of industrial properties, which typically feature larger tenant concentration. The insolvency and/or closing of a single tenant in one of our industrial properties may significantly impair the income generated by an industrial property, and may also depress the value of such property. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In addition, the Account owns and operates a number of properties in the Washington, DC metropolitan area and a prolonged period of significantly diminished federal expenditures could have an adverse |
9
|
impact on demand for office space by the U.S. government and the sectors and industries dependent upon the U.S. government in such region or other regions where the government or such related businesses are large lessees. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If any or all of these events occur, the Accounts income and performance may be adversely impacted disproportionately by deteriorating economic conditions in those areas or industry sectors in which the Accounts investments are concentrated. Also, the Account could experience a more rapid negative change in the value of its real estate investments than would be the case if its real estate investments were more diversified. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Leasing Risk. A number of factors could cause the Accounts rental income, a key source of the Accounts revenue and investment return, to decline, which would adversely impact the Accounts results and investment returns. These factors include the following: |
|
A property may be unable to attract new tenants or retain existing tenants. This situation could be exacerbated if a concentration of lease expirations occurred during any one time period or multiple tenants exercise early termination at the same time. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The financial condition of our tenants may be adversely impacted, particularly in a prolonged economic downturn. The Account could lose revenue if tenants do not pay rent when contractually obligated, request some form of rent relief and/or default under a lease at one of the Accounts properties. Such a default could occur if a tenant declared bankruptcy, suffered from a lack of liquidity, failed to continue to operate its business or for other reasons. In the event of any such default, we may experience a delay in, or an inability to effect, the enforcement of our rights against that tenant, particularly if that tenant filed for bankruptcy protection. Further, any disputes with tenants could involve costly and time consuming litigation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In the event a tenant vacates its space at one of the Accounts properties, whether as a result of a default, the expiration of the lease term, rejection of the lease in bankruptcy or otherwise, given current market conditions, we may not be able to re-lease the vacant space either (i) for as much as the rent payable under the previous lease or (ii) at all. Also, we may not be able to re-lease such space without incurring substantial expenditures for tenant improvements and other lease-up related costs, while still being obligated for any mortgage payments, real estate taxes and other expenditures related to the property. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In some instances, our properties may be specifically suited to and/or outfitted for the particular needs of a certain tenant based on the type of business the tenant operates. For example, many companies desire space with an open floor plan. We may have difficulty obtaining a new tenant for any vacant space in our properties, particularly if the floor plan limits the types of businesses that can use the space without major renovation, which may require us to incur substantial expense in re-planning the space. Also, upon expiration of a lease, the space preferences of our major tenants may no longer align with the space they previously rented, which could cause those tenants to not renew their lease, or may require us to expend significant sums to reconfigure the space to their needs. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Account owns and operates retail properties, which, in addition to the risks listed above, are subject to specific risks, including the insolvency and/or closing of an anchor tenant. Many times, anchor tenants will be big box stores and other large retailers that can be particularly adversely impacted by a global recession and reduced consumer spending generally. Factors that can impact the level of consumer spending include increases in fuel and energy costs, residential and commercial real estate and mortgage conditions, labor and healthcare costs, access to credit, consumer confidence and other macroeconomic factors. Under certain circumstances, co-tenancy clauses in tenants leases may allow certain tenants in a retail property to terminate their leases or reduce or withhold rental payments when overall occupancy at the property falls below certain minimum levels. The insolvency and/or closing of an anchor tenant may also cause such tenants to terminate their leases, or to fail to renew their leases at expiration. |
|
Competition. The Account may face competition for real estate investments from multiple sources, including individuals, corporations, insurance companies or other insurance company separate accounts, as well as real estate limited partnerships, real estate investment funds, commercial developers, pension plans, other institutional and foreign investors and other entities engaged in real estate investment |
10
|
activities. Some of these competitors may have similar financial and other resources as the Account, and/ or they may have investment strategies and policies (including the ability to incur significantly more leverage than the Account) that allow them to compete more aggressively for real estate investment opportunities, which could result in the Account paying higher prices for investments, experiencing delays in acquiring investments or failing to consummate such purchases. Any resulting delays in the acquisition of investments, or the failure to consummate acquisitions the Account deems desirable, may increase the Accounts costs or otherwise adversely affect the Accounts investment results. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In addition, the Accounts properties may be located close to properties that are owned by other real estate investors and that compete with the Account for tenants. These competing properties may be better located, more suitable for tenants than our properties or have owners who may compete more aggressively for tenants, resulting in a competitive advantage for these other properties. We may also face similar competition from other properties that may be developed in the future. This competition may limit the Accounts ability to lease space, increase its costs of securing tenants, and limit our ability to maximize our rents and/or require the Account to make capital improvements it otherwise would not, in order to make its properties more attractive to prospective tenants. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating Costs. A propertys cash flow could decrease if operating costs, such as property taxes, utilities, litigation expenses associated with a property, maintenance and insurance costs that are not reimbursed by tenants, increase in relation to gross rental income, or if the property needs unanticipated repairs and renovations. In addition, the Accounts expenses of owning and operating a property are not necessarily reduced when the Accounts income from a property is reduced. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Condemnation. A governmental agency may condemn and convert for a public use (i.e., through eminent domain) all or a portion of a property owned by the Account. While the Account would receive compensation in connection with any such condemnation, such compensation may not be in an amount the Account believes represents equivalent value for the condemned property. Further, a partial condemnation could impair the ability of the Account to maximize the value of the property during its operation, including making it more difficult to find new tenants or retain existing tenants. Finally, a property which has been subject to a partial condemnation may be more difficult to sell at a price the Account believes is appropriate. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Terrorism and Acts of War and Violence. Terrorist attacks may harm our property investments. The Account can provide no assurance that there will not be further terrorist attacks against the United States or U.S. businesses or elsewhere in the world. These attacks or armed conflicts may directly or indirectly impact the value of the property we own or that secure our loans. Losses resulting from these types of events may be uninsurable or not insurable to the full extent of the loss suffered. Moreover, any of these events could cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease or result in increased volatility in the United States, worldwide financial markets, and the global economy. Such events could also result in economic uncertainty in the United States or abroad. Adverse economic conditions resulting from terrorist activities could reduce demand for space in the Accounts properties and thereby reduce the value of the Accounts properties and therefore your investment return. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Risk of Limited Warranty. Purchasing a property as is or with limited warranties, which limit the Accounts recourse if due diligence fails to identify all material risks, can negatively impact the Account by reducing the value of such properties and increasing the Accounts cost to hold or sell properties. |
General Risks of Selling Real Estate Investments: Among the risks of selling real estate investments are:
|
The sale price of an Account property might differ, perhaps significantly, from its estimated or appraised value, leading to losses or reduced profits to the Account. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Account might not be able to sell a property at a particular time for a price which management believes represents its fair or full value. This illiquidity may result from the cyclical nature of real estate, general economic conditions impacting the location of the property, disruption in the credit markets or the availability of financing on favorable terms or at all, and the supply of and demand for available tenant space, among other reasons. This might make it difficult to raise cash quickly which could impair the Accounts liquidity position (particularly during any period of sustained significant net participant outflows) and also could lead to Account losses. Further, the liquidity guarantee does not serve as a working capital facility or credit line to enhance the Accounts liquidity levels generally, |
11
|
as its purpose is tied to participants having the ability to redeem their accumulation units upon demand (thus, alleviating the Accounts need to dispose of properties solely to increase liquidity levels in what management deems a suboptimal sales environment). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Account may need to provide financing to a purchaser if no cash buyers are available, or if buyers are unable to receive financing on terms enabling them to consummate the purchase. Such seller financing introduces a risk that the counterparty may not perform its obligations to repay the amounts borrowed from the Account to complete the purchase. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For any particular property, the Account may be required to make expenditures for improvements to, or to correct defects in, the property before the Account is able to market and/or sell the property. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interests in real estate limited partnerships tend to be, in particular, illiquid and the Account may be unable to dispose of such investments at opportune times. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Seller Indemnities. When the Account sells property, it is often required to provide some amount of indemnity for loss to the buyer. While the Account takes steps to try to mitigate the impact of the indemnities, such indemnities could negatively impact the sale price or result in claims by the buyer for indemnity in the future, which could increase the Accounts expenses and thereby reduce the return on investment. |
Valuation and Appraisal Risks: Investments in the Accounts assets are stated at fair value, which is defined as the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Determination of fair value, particularly for real estate assets, involves significant judgment. Valuation of the Accounts real estate properties (which comprise a substantial majority of the Accounts net assets) are based on real estate appraisals, which are estimates of property values based on a professionals opinion and may not be accurate predictors of the amount the Account would actually receive if it sold a property. Appraisals can be subjective in certain respects and rely on a variety of assumptions and conditions at that property or in the market in which the property is located, which may change materially after the appraisal is conducted. Among other things, market prices for comparable real estate may be volatile, in particular if there has been a lack of recent transaction activity in such market. Recent disruptions in the macroeconomy, real estate markets and the credit markets have led to a significant decline in transaction activity in most markets and sectors and the lack of observable transaction data may have made it more difficult for an appraisal to determine the fair value of the Accounts real estate. In addition, a portion of the data used by appraisers is based on historical information at the time the appraisal is conducted, and subsequent changes to such data, after an appraiser has used such data in connection with the appraisal, may not be adequately captured in the appraised value. Also, to the extent that the Account uses a relatively small number of independent appraisers to value a significant portion of its properties, valuations may be subject to any institutional biases of such appraisers and their valuation procedures.
Further, as the Account generally obtains appraisals on a quarterly basis, there may be circumstances in the period between appraisals or interim valuation adjustments in which the true realizable value of a property is not reflected in the Accounts daily net asset value calculation or in the Accounts periodic consolidated financial statements. This disparity may be more apparent when the commercial and/or residential real estate markets experience an overall and possibly dramatic decline (or increase) in property values in a relatively short period of time between appraisals.
If the appraised values of the Accounts properties as a whole are too high, those participants who purchased accumulation units prior to (i) a downward valuation adjustment of a property or multiple properties or (ii) a property or properties being sold for a lower price than the appraised value will be credited with less of an interest than if the value had previously been adjusted downward. Also, those participants who redeem during any such period will have received more than their pro rata share of the value of the Accounts assets, to the detriment of other non-redeeming participants. In particular, appraised property values may prove to be too high (as a whole) in a rapidly declining commercial real estate market. Further, implicit in the Accounts definition of fair value is a principal assumption that there will be a reasonable time to market a given property and that the property will be exchanged between a willing buyer and willing seller in a non-distressed scenario. However, an appraised value may not reflect the actual realizable value that would be obtained in a rush sale where time was of the essence. Also, appraised values may lag actual realizable values to the extent there is significant and rapid economic deterioration in a particular geographic market or a particular sector within a geographic market.
12
If the appraised values of the Accounts properties as a whole are too low, those participants who redeem prior to (i) an upward valuation adjustment of a property or multiple properties or (ii) a property or properties being sold for a higher price than the appraised value will have received less than their pro rata share of the value of the Accounts assets, and those participants who purchase units during any such period will be credited with more than their pro rata share of the value of the Accounts assets.
Finally, the Account recognizes items of income (such as net operating income from real estate investments, distributions from real estate limited partnerships or joint ventures, or dividends from REIT stocks) and expense in many cases on an intermittent basis, where the Account cannot predict with certainty the magnitude or the timing of such items. As such, even as the Account estimates items of net operating income on a daily basis, the AUV for the Account may fluctuate, perhaps significantly, from day to day, as a result of adjusting these estimates for the actual recognized item of income or expense.
Investment Risk Associated with Participant Transactions: The amount the Account has available to invest in new properties and other real estate-related assets will depend, in large part, on the level of net participant transfers into or out of the Account as well as participant premiums into the Account. As noted elsewhere in this report, the Account intends to hold between 15% and 25% of its net assets in publicly traded liquid investments (other than real estate and real estate-related investments), consisting of publicly traded, liquid investments. These liquid assets are intended to be available to purchase real estate- related investments in accordance with the Accounts investment objective and strategy and are also available to meet participant redemption requests and the Accounts expense needs (including, from time to time, obligations on debt). Significant participant transaction activity into or out of the Accounts units is generally not predictable, and wide fluctuations can occur as a result of macroeconomic or geopolitical conditions, the performance of equities or fixed income securities or general investor sentiment, regardless of the historical performance of the Account or of the performance of the real estate asset class generally.
In the second half of 2008 and in 2009, the Account experienced significant net participant transfers out of the Account, eventually causing the Accounts liquid assets to comprise less than 10% of the Accounts assets (on a net and total basis) throughout all of 2009 and into early 2010. Due in large part to this activity, the TIAA liquidity guarantee was initially executed in December 2008. See Establishing and Managing the AccountThe Role of TIAALiquidity Guarantee, in the Accounts prospectus. Among other things, this continued shortfall in the amount of liquid assets impaired managements ability to consummate new transactions. If a significant amount of net participant transfers out of the Account were to recur, particularly in high volumes similar to those experienced in late 2008 and 2009, the Account may not have enough available liquid assets to pursue, or consummate, new investment opportunities presented to us that are otherwise attractive to the Account. This, in turn, could harm the Accounts returns. Even though net transfers out of the Account ceased in early 2010 and, as of the date of this report, the Account has been in a net inflow position since such time, there is no guarantee that redemption activity will not increase again, perhaps in a significant and rapid manner.
Alternatively, periods of significant net transfer activity into the Account can result in the Account holding a higher percentage of its net assets in publicly traded liquid non-real estate-related investments than the Accounts managers would target to hold under the Accounts long-term strategy. As of December 31, 2015, the Accounts non-real estate-related liquid assets comprised 18.9% of its net assets. At times, the portion of the Accounts net assets invested in these types of liquid instruments may exceed 25%, particularly if the Account receives a large inflow of money in a short period of time, coupled with a lack of attractive real estate-related investments on the market. Also, large inflows from participant transactions often occur in times of appreciating real estate values and pricing, which can render it challenging to execute on some transactions at ideal prices.
In an appreciating real estate market generally, this large percentage of assets held in liquid investments and not in real estate and real estate-related investments may impair the Accounts overall returns. This scenario may be exacerbated in a low interest rate environment for U.S. Treasury securities and related highly liquid securities, such as has existed since 2009 and which may persist in the future. In addition, to manage cash flow, the Account may temporarily hold a higher percentage of its net assets in liquid real estate-related securities, such as REIT and CMBS securities, than its long-term targeted holdings in such securities, particularly during and immediately following times of significant net transfer activity into the Account. Such holdings could increase the volatility of the Accounts returns.
13
Risks of Borrowing: The Account acquires some of its properties subject to existing financing and from time to time borrows new funds at the time of purchase. Also, the Account may from time to time place new leverage on, increase the leverage already placed on, or refinance maturing debt on, existing properties the Account owns. Under the Accounts current investment guidelines, the Account intends to maintain its loan to value ratio at or below 30% (measured at the time of incurrence and after giving effect thereto). As of December 31, 2015, the Accounts loan to value ratio was approximately 12.8%. Also, the Account may borrow up to 70% of the then-current value of a particular property. Non-construction mortgage loans on a property will be non-recourse to the Account.
Among the risks of borrowing money or otherwise investing in a property subject to a mortgage are:
|
General Economic Conditions. General economic conditions, dislocations in the capital or credit markets generally or the market conditions then in effect in the real estate finance industry, may hinder the Accounts ability to obtain financing or refinancing for its property investments on favorable terms or at all, regardless of the quality of the Accounts property for which financing or refinancing is sought. Such unfavorable terms might include high interest rates, increased fees and costs and restrictive covenants applicable to the Accounts operation of the property. Longer term disruptions in the capital and credit markets as a result of uncertainty, changing or increased regulation, reduced alternatives, rising interest rates or failures of significant financial institutions could adversely affect our access to financing necessary to make profitable real estate investments. Our failure to obtain financing or refinancing on favorable terms due to the current state of the credit markets or otherwise could have an adverse impact on the returns of the Account. Also, the Accounts ability to secure financing may be impaired if negative marketplace effects, such as those which followed from the worldwide economic slowdown following the banking crisis of 2008 and the subsequent sovereign debt and banking difficulties recently experienced in parts of the eurozone, were to persist. These difficulties could include tighter lending standards instituted by banks and financial institutions, the reduced availability of credit facilities and project finance facilities from banks and the fall of consumer and/or business confidence. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Default Risk. The property or group of encumbered properties may not generate sufficient cash flow to support the debt service on the loan, the property may fail to meet certain financial or operating covenants contained in the loan documents and/or the property may have negative equity (i.e., the loan balance exceeds the value of the property) or inadequate equity. In any of these circumstances, we (or a joint venture in which we invest) may default on the loan, including due to the failure to make required debt service payments when due. If a loan is in default, the Account or the venture may determine that it is not economically desirable and/or in the best interests of the Account to continue to make payments on the loan (including accessing other sources of funds to support debt service on the loan), and/or the Account or venture may not be able to otherwise remedy such default on commercially reasonable terms or at all. In either case, the lender then could accelerate the outstanding amount due on the loan and/or foreclose on the underlying property, in which case the Account could lose the value of its investment in the foreclosed property. Further, any such default or acceleration could trigger a default under loan agreements in respect of other Account properties pledged as security for the defaulted loan or other loans. Finally, any such default could increase the Accounts borrowing costs, or result in less favorable terms, with respect to financing future properties. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balloon Maturities. If the Account obtains a mortgage loan that involves a balloon payment, there is a risk that the Account may not be able to make the lump sum principal payment due under the loan at the end of the loan term, or otherwise obtain adequate refinancing on terms commercially acceptable to the Account or at all. The Account then may be forced to sell the property or other properties under unfavorable market conditions, restructure the loan on terms not advantageous to the Account, or default on its mortgage, resulting in the lender exercising its remedies, which may include repossession of the property, and the Account could lose the value of its investment in that property. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Variable Interest Rate Risk. If the Account obtains variable-rate loans, the Accounts returns may be volatile when interest rates are volatile. Further, to the extent that the Account takes out fixed-rate loans and interest rates subsequently decline, this may cause the Account to pay interest at above-market rates for a significant period of time. Any interest rate hedging activities the Account engages in to mitigate this risk may not fully protect the Account from the impact of interest rate volatility. |
14
|
Variable Rate Demand Obligation (VRDO) Risk. To the extent the Account obtains financing pursuant to a variable rate demand obligation subject to periodic remarketing or similar mechanisms, the Account or the joint ventures in which it invests could face higher borrowing costs if the remarketing results in a higher prevailing interest rate. In addition, the terms of such variable rate obligations may allow the remarketing agent to cause the Account or venture to repay the loan on demand in the event insufficient market demand for such loans is present. In particular, RGM 42, LLC, a joint venture in which the Account holds a 70% interest, is the borrower under a VRDO loan program. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Valuation Risk. The market valuation of mortgage loans payable could have an adverse impact on the Accounts performance. Valuations of mortgage loans payable are generally based on the amount at which the liability could be transferred in a current transaction, exclusive of transaction costs, and such valuations are subject to a number of assumptions and factors with respect to the loan and the underlying property, a change in any of which could cause the value of a mortgage loan to fluctuate. |
A general disruption in the credit markets, such as the disruption experienced in 2008 and 2009, may aggravate some or all of these risks.
Risks of Joint Ownership: Investing in joint venture partnerships or other forms of joint property ownership may involve special risks, many of which are exacerbated when the consent of parties other than the Account are required to take action.
|
The co-venturer may have interests or goals inconsistent with those of the Account, including during times when a co-venturer may be experiencing financial difficulty. For example: |
|
a co-venturer may desire a higher current income return on a particular investment than does the Account (which may be motivated by a longer-term investment horizon or exit strategy), or vice versa, which could cause difficulty in managing a particular asset; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
a co-venturer may desire to maximize or minimize leverage in the venture, which may be at odds with the Accounts strategy; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
a co-venturer may be more or less likely than the Account to agree to modify the terms of significant agreements (including loan agreements) binding the venture, or may significantly delay in reaching a determination whether to do so, each of which may frustrate the business objectives of the Account and/or lead to a default under a loan secured by a property owned by the venture; and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
for reasons related to its own business strategy, a co-venturer may have different concentration standards as to its investments (geographically, by sector, or by tenant), which might frustrate the execution of the business plan for the joint venture. |
|
The co-venturer may be unable to fulfill its obligations (such as to fund its pro rata share of committed capital, expenditures or guarantee obligations of the venture) during the term of such agreement or may become insolvent or bankrupt, any of which could expose the Account to greater liabilities than expected and frustrate the investment objective of the venture. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If a co-venturer doesnt follow the Accounts instructions or adhere to the Accounts policies, the jointly owned properties, and consequently the Account, might be exposed to greater liabilities than expected. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Account may have limited rights with respect to the underlying property pursuant to the terms of the joint venture, including the right to operate, manage or dispose of a property, and a co-venturer could have approval rights over the marketing or the ultimate sale of the underlying property. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The terms of the Accounts ventures often provide for complicated agreements which can impede our ability to direct the sale of the property owned by the venture at times the Account views most favorable. One such agreement is a buy-sell right, which may force us to make a decision (either to buy our co- venturers interest or sell our interest to our co-venturer) at inopportune times. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A co-venturer can make it harder for the Account to transfer its equity interest in the venture to a third party, which could adversely impact the valuation of the Accounts interest in the venture. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To the extent the Account serves as the general partner or managing member in a venture, it may owe certain contractual or other duties to the co-venturer, including fiduciary duties, which may present |
15
|
perceived or actual conflicts of interest in the management of the underlying assets. Such an arrangement could also subject the Account to liability to third parties in the performance of its duties as a general partner or managing member. |
Risks of Developing or Redeveloping Real Estate or Buying Recently Constructed Properties: If the Account chooses to develop or redevelop a property or buys a recently constructed property, it may face the following risks:
|
There may be delays or unexpected increases in the cost of property development, redevelopment and construction due to strikes, bad weather, material shortages, increases in material and labor costs or other events. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There are risks associated with potential underperformance or non-performance by, and/or solvency of a contractor we select or other third party vendors involved in developing or redeveloping the property. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If the Account were viewed as developing or redeveloping underperforming properties, suffering losses on our investments, or defaulting on any loans on our properties, our reputation could be damaged. Damage to our reputation could make it more difficult to successfully develop or acquire properties in the future and to continue to grow and expand our relationships with our lenders, venture partners and tenants. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Because external factors may have changed from when the project was originally conceived (e.g., slower growth in the local economy, higher interest rates, overbuilding in the area, or changes in the regulatory and permitting environment), the property may not attract tenants on the schedule we originally planned and/or may not operate at the income and expense levels first projected. |
Risks with Purchase-Leaseback Transactions: To the extent the Account invested in a purchase-leaseback transaction, the major risk is that the third party lessee will be unable to make required payments to the Account. If the leaseback interest is subordinate to other interests in the real property, such as a first mortgage or other lien, the risk to the Account increases because the lessee may have to pay the senior lienholder to prevent foreclosure before it pays the Account. If the lessee defaults or the leaseback is terminated prematurely, the Account might not recover its investment unless the property is sold or leased on favorable terms.
Real Estate Regulatory Risks: Government regulation at the federal, state and local levels, including, without limitation, zoning laws, rent control or rent stabilization laws, laws regulating housing on the Accounts multifamily properties, the Americans with Disabilities Act, property taxes and fiscal, accounting, environmental or other government policies, could operate or change in a way that adversely affects the Account and its properties. For example, these regulations could raise the cost of acquiring, owning, improving or maintaining properties, present barriers to otherwise desirable investment opportunities or make it harder to sell, rent, finance, or refinance properties either on economically desirable terms, or at all, due to the increased costs associated with regulatory compliance.
Environmental Risks: The Account may be liable for damage to the environment or injury to individuals caused by hazardous substances used or found on its properties. Under various environmental regulations, the Account may also be liable, as a current or previous property owner or mortgagee, for the cost of removing or cleaning up hazardous substances found on a property, even if it did not know of and wasnt responsible for the hazardous substances. If any hazardous substances are present or the Account does not properly clean up any hazardous substances, or if the Account fails to comply with regulations requiring it to actively monitor the business activities on its premises, the Account may have difficulty selling or renting a property or be liable for monetary penalties. Further, environmental laws may impose restrictions on the manner in which a property may be used, the tenants which may be allowed, or the manner in which businesses may be operated, which may require the Account to expend funds in order to comply with these laws. These laws may also cause the most ideal use of the property to differ from that originally contemplated and as a result could impair the Accounts returns. The cost of any required clean-up relating to a single real estate investment (including remediating contaminated property) and the Accounts potential liability for environmental damage, including paying personal injury claims and performing under indemnification obligations to third parties, could exceed the value of the Accounts investment in a property, the propertys value, or in an extreme case, a significant portion of the Accounts assets. Finally, while the Account may
16
from time to time acquire third-party insurance related to environmental risks, such insurance coverage may be inadequate to cover the full cost of any loss and would cause the Account to be reliant on the financial health of our third-party insurer at the time any such claim is submitted.
Uninsurable Losses: Certain catastrophic losses (e.g., from earthquakes, wars, terrorist acts, nuclear accidents, hurricanes, wind, floods or environmental or industrial hazards or accidents) may be uninsurable or so expensive to insure against that it is economically disadvantageous to buy insurance for them. Further, the terms and conditions of the insurance coverage the Account has on its properties, in conjunction with the type of loss actually suffered at a property, may subject the property, or the Account as a whole, to a cap on insurance proceeds that is less than the loss or losses suffered. If a disaster that we have not insured against occurs, if the insurance contains a high deductible, and/or if the aggregate insurance proceeds for a particular type of casualty are capped, the Account could lose some of its original investment and any future profits from the property. Also, the Account may not have sufficient access to internal or external sources of funding to repair or reconstruct a damaged property to the extent insurance proceeds do not cover the full loss. In addition, some leases may permit a tenant to terminate its obligations in certain situations, regardless of whether those events are fully covered by insurance. In that case, the Account would not receive rental income from the property while that tenants space is vacant, and any such vacancy might impact the value of that property. Finally, as with respect to all third-party insurance, we are reliant on the continued financial health of such insurers and their ability to pay on valid claims. If the financial health of an insurer were to deteriorate quickly, we may not be able to find adequate coverage from another carrier on favorable terms, which could adversely impact the Accounts returns.
RISKS OF INVESTING IN REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST SECURITIES
The Account invests in registered and unregistered REIT securities for diversification, liquidity management and other purposes. The Accounts investment in REITs may also increase, as a percentage of net assets, during periods in which the Account is experiencing large net inflow activity, in particular due to net participant transfers into the Account. As of December 31, 2015, REIT securities comprised approximately 4.6% of the Accounts net assets. Investments in REIT securities are part of the Accounts real estate-related investment strategy and are subject to many of the same general risks associated with direct real property ownership. In particular, equity REITs may be affected by changes in the value of the underlying properties owned by the entity, while mortgage REITs may be affected by the quality of any credit extended. In addition to these risks, because REIT investments are securities and generally publicly traded, they may be exposed to market risk and potentially significant price volatility due to changing conditions in the financial markets and, in particular, changes in overall interest rates, regardless of the value of the underlying real estate such REIT may own. Also, sales of REIT securities by the Account for liquidity management purposes may occur at times when values of such securities have declined and it is otherwise an inopportune time to sell the security. Volatility in REITs can cause significant fluctuations in the Accounts AUV on a daily basis, as they are correlated to equity markets which have experienced significant day to day fluctuations over the past few years.
REITs do not pay federal income taxes if they distribute most of their earnings to their shareholders and meet other tax requirements. Many of the requirements to qualify as a REIT, however, are highly technical and complex. Failure to qualify as a REIT results in tax consequences, as well as disqualification from operating as a REIT for a period of time. Consequently, if the Account invests in securities of a REIT that later fails to qualify as a REIT, this may adversely affect the performance of our investment.
RISKS OF MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES
The Account from time to time has invested in mortgage-backed securities and may in the future invest in such securities. Mortgage-backed securities, such as CMBS, are subject to many of the same general risks inherent in real estate investing, making mortgage loans and investing in debt securities. The underlying mortgage loans may experience defaults with greater frequency than projected when such mortgages were underwritten, which would impact the values of these securities, and could hamper our ability to sell such securities. In particular, these types of investments may be subject to prepayment risk or extension risk (i.e., the risk that borrowers will repay the loans earlier or later than anticipated). If the underlying mortgage assets experience faster than anticipated prepayments of principal, the Account could fail to recoup some or
17
all of its initial investment in these securities, since the original price paid by the Account was based in part on assumptions regarding the receipt of interest payments. If the underlying mortgage assets are repaid later than anticipated, the Account could lose the opportunity to reinvest the anticipated cash flows at a time when interest rates might be rising. The rate of prepayments depends on a variety of geographic, social and other functions, including prevailing market interest rates and general economic factors. Further, it is possible that the U.S. Government may change its support of, and policies regarding, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and, thus, the Account may be unable to acquire agency mortgage-backed securities in the future and even if the Account so acquired them, such changes may result in a negative effect on the pricing of such securities. Other policy changes impacting Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and/or U.S. Government programs related to mortgages that may be implemented in the future could create market uncertainty and affect the actual or perceived credit quality of issued securities, adversely affecting mortgage-backed securities through an increased risk of loss.
Importantly, the fair market value of these securities is also highly sensitive to changes in interest rates, liquidity of the secondary market and economic conditions impacting financial institutions and the credit markets generally. Note that the potential for appreciation, which could otherwise be expected to result from a decline in interest rates, may be limited by any increased prepayments. Further, volatility and disruption in the mortgage market and credit markets generally (such as was the case in 2008 and 2009) may cause there to be a very limited or even no secondary market for these securities and they therefore may be harder to sell than other securities.
RISKS OF U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY SECURITIES AND CORPORATE OBLIGATIONS
The Account invests in securities issued by U.S. government agencies and U.S. government-sponsored entities. Some of these issuers may not have their securities backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, which could adversely affect the pricing and value of such securities. Also, the Account may invest in corporate obligations (such as commercial paper) and while the Account seeks out such holdings in short-term, higher-quality liquid instruments, the ability of the Account to sell these securities may be uncertain, particularly when there are general dislocations in the finance or credit markets. Any such volatility could have a negative impact on the value of these securities. Further, transaction activity may fluctuate significantly from time to time, which could impair the Accounts ability to dispose of a security at a favorable time, regardless of the credit quality of the underlying issuer. Also, inherent with investing in any corporate obligation is the risk that the credit quality of the issuer will deteriorate, which could cause the obligations to be downgraded and hamper the value or the liquidity of these securities. Finally, any further downgrades or threatened downgrades of the credit rating for U.S. government obligations generally could impact the pricing and liquidity of agency securities or corporate obligations in a manner which could impact the value of the Accounts units.
RISKS OF LIQUID INVESTMENTS
The Accounts investments in liquid investments (whether real estate-related, such as REITs, CMBS or some loans receivable, or non-real estate-related, such as cash equivalents and government securities, and whether debt or equity), are subject to the following general risks:
|
Financial / Credit RiskThe risk, for debt securities, that the issuer will not be able to pay principal and interest when due (and/or declare bankruptcy or be subject to receivership) and, for equity securities such as common or preferred stock, that the issuers current earnings will fall or that its overall financial soundness will decline, reducing the securitys value. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Market Volatility RiskThe risk that the Accounts investments will experience price volatility due to changing conditions in the financial markets even regardless of the credit quality or financial condition of the underlying issuer. This risk is particularly acute to the extent the Account holds equity securities, which have experienced significant short-term price volatility in recent years. Also, to the extent the Account holds debt securities, changes in overall interest rates can cause price fluctuations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest Rate VolatilityThe risk that interest rate volatility may affect the Accounts current income from an investment. As interest rates rise, the value of certain debt securities (such as those bearing lower fixed rates) held by the Account is likely to decrease. As of the date of this report, interest rates |
18
|
in the United States are at or near historic lows, which may increase the Accounts exposure to risks associated with rising interest rates. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deposit / Money Market RiskThe risk that, to the extent the Accounts cash held in bank deposit accounts exceeds federally insured limits as to that bank, the Account could experience losses if banks fail. In addition, there is some risk that investments held in money market accounts or funds can suffer losses. |
Further, to the extent that a significant portion of the Accounts net assets, at any particular time, consist of cash, cash equivalents and non-real estate-related liquid securities, the Accounts returns may suffer as compared to the return that could have been generated by more profitable real estate-related investments. Such a potential negative impact on returns may be exacerbated in times of low prevailing interest rates payable on many classes of liquid securities, such as is the case as of the date hereof and which may persist in the future.
RISKS OF FOREIGN INVESTMENTS
In addition to other investment risks noted above, foreign investments present the following special risks:
|
The value of foreign investments or rental income can increase or decrease due to changes in currency exchange rates, currency exchange control or market control regulations, possible expropriation or confiscatory taxation, political, social, diplomatic and economic developments and foreign regulations. The Account translates into U.S. dollars purchases and sales of securities, income receipts and expense payments made in foreign currencies at the exchange rates prevailing on the respective dates of the transactions. The effect of any changes in currency exchange rates on investments and mortgage loans payable is included in the Accounts net realized and unrealized gains and losses. As such, fluctuations in currency exchange rates may impair the Accounts returns. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Account may, but is not required to, hedge its exposure to changes in currency rates, which could involve extra costs. Further, any hedging activities might not be successful. Such hedges may also be subject to valuation changes. In addition, a lender to a foreign property owned by the Account could require the Account to compensate it for its loss associated with such lenders hedging activities. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-U.S. jurisdictions may impose withholding taxes on the Account as a result of its investment activity in that jurisdiction. TIAA may be eligible for a foreign tax credit in respect of such tax paid by the Account and such credit (if available to TIAA) would be reimbursed to the Account. However, there may be circumstances where TIAA is unable to receive some or all of the benefit of a foreign tax credit and the Account would thus not receive reimbursement, which could harm the value of the Accounts units. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign real estate markets may have different liquidity and volatility attributes than U.S. markets. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The regulatory environment in non-U.S. jurisdictions may disfavor owners and operators of real estate investment properties, resulting in less predictable and/or economically harmful outcomes if the Account were to face a significant dispute with a tenant or with a regulator itself. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Account may be subject to increased risk of regulatory scrutiny pursuant to U.S. federal statutes, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which, among other things, requires robust compliance and oversight programs to help prevent violations. The costs associated with maintaining such programs, in addition to costs associated with a potential regulatory inquiry, could impair the Accounts returns and divert managements attention from other Account activities. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It may be more difficult to obtain and collect a judgment on foreign investments than on domestic investments, and the costs associated with contesting claims relating to foreign investments may exceed those costs associated with a similar claim on domestic investments. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
We may invest from time to time in securities issued by (1) entities domiciled in foreign countries, (2) domestic affiliates of such entities and/or (3) foreign domiciled affiliates of domestic entities. Such investments could be subject to the risks associated with investments subject to foreign regulation, including political unrest or the seizure, expropriation, repatriation or nationalization of the issuers |
19
|
assets. These events could depress the value of such securities and/or make such securities harder to sell on favorable terms, if at all. |
RISKS OF INVESTING IN MORTGAGE LOANS AND RELATED INVESTMENTS
The Accounts investment strategy includes, to a limited extent, investments in mortgage loans (i.e., the Account serving as lender).
|
General Risks of Mortgage Loans. The Account will be subject to the risks inherent in making mortgage loans, including: |
|
The borrower may default on the loan, requiring that the Account foreclose on the underlying property to protect the value of its mortgage loan. Since its mortgage loans are usually non-recourse, the Account must rely solely on the value of a property for its security. In addition, there is a risk of delay in exercising any contractual remedies due to actions of the borrower, including, without limitation, bankruptcy or insolvency of the borrower. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The larger the mortgage loan compared to the value of the property securing it, the greater the loans risk. Upon default, the Account may not be able to sell the property for its estimated or appraised value. Also, certain liens on the property, such as mechanics or tax liens, may have priority over the Accounts security interest. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A deterioration in the financial condition of tenants, which could be caused by general or local economic conditions or other factors beyond the control of the Account, or the bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant, may adversely affect the income of a property, which could increase the likelihood that the borrower will default under its obligations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The borrower may be unable to make a lump sum principal payment due under a mortgage loan at the end of the loan term, unless it can refinance the mortgage loan with another lender. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If interest rates are volatile during the loan period, the Accounts variable-rate mortgage loans could have volatile yields. Further, to the extent the Account makes mortgage loans with fixed interest rates, it may receive lower yields than that which is then available in the market if interest rates rise generally. |
|
Interest Rate Risk. The risk that the value or yield of fixed-income investments may decline if interest rates change. In general, when prevailing interest rates decline, the market values of outstanding fixed-income investments (particularly those paying a fixed rate of interest) tend to increase while yields on similar newly issued fixed-income investments tend to decrease, which could adversely affect the Accounts income. Conversely, when prevailing interest rates increase, the market values of outstanding fixed-income investments (particularly those paying a fixed rate of interest) tend to decline while yields on similar newly issued fixed-income investments tend to increase. If a fixed-income investment pays a floating or variable rate of interest, changes in prevailing interest rates may increase or decrease the investments yield. Fixed-income investments with longer durations tend to be more sensitive to interest rate changes than shorter-term investments. Interest rate risk is generally heightened during periods when prevailing interest rates are low or negative. During periods of very low or negative interest rates, a fixed-income investment may not be able to maintain positive returns. As of the date of this Prospectus, interest rates in the United States and in certain foreign markets are at or near historic lows, which may increase the Accounts exposure to risks associated with rising interest rates. In general, changing interest rates could have unpredictable effects on the markets and may expose fixed-income and related markets to heightened volatility. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Extension Risk. The risk that during periods of rising interest rates, borrowers pay off their mortgage loans later than expected, preventing the Account from reinvesting principal proceeds at higher interest rates, resulting in less income than potentially available. These risks are normally present in mortgage- backed securities and other asset-backed securities. For example, homeowners have the option to prepay their mortgages. Therefore, the duration of a security backed by home mortgages can lengthen depending on homeowner prepayment activity. A decline in the prepayment rate and the resulting increase in duration of fixed-income securities held by the Account can result in losses to the Account. |
20
|
Prepayment Risks. The Accounts mortgage loan investments will usually be subject to the risk that the borrower repays a loan early. Also, the Account may be unable to reinvest the proceeds at as high an interest rate as the original mortgage loan rate, resulting in a decline in income. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest Limitations. The interest rate we charge on mortgage loans may inadvertently violate state usury laws that limit rates, if, for example, state law changes during the loan term. If this happens, the Account could incur penalties or may be unable to enforce payment of the loan. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Risks of Investing in Mezzanine Loans. The Account may invest from time to time in mezzanine loans to entities which own real estate assets. Generally these loans will be secured by a pledge of the equity securities of the entity, but not by a first lien security interest in the property itself. As such, the Accounts recovery in the event of an adverse circumstance at the property (such as a default under a mortgage loan on the property) will be subordinated to the recovery available to the first lien mortgage lender(s) to the property. The Accounts remedy may solely consist of foreclosing on the equity interest in the entity owning the property, and that equity interest will be junior in right of a recovery to a loan secured by the property owned by the entity. Also, as a subordinated lender, the Account may have limited rights to exercise control over the process by which the mortgage loan is restructured or the property is liquidated following a default. Any of these circumstances may result in the Account being unable to recover some or all of its original investment. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Risks of Participations. To the extent the Account invested in a participating mortgage, the following additional risks would apply: |
|
The participation feature, in tying the Accounts returns to the performance of the underlying asset, might generate insufficient returns to make up for the higher interest rate the loan would have obtained without the participation feature. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In very limited circumstances, a court may characterize the Accounts participation interest as a partnership or joint venture with the borrower and the Account could lose the priority of its security interest or become liable for the borrowers debts. |
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST WITHIN TIAA
General. TIAA and its affiliates (including TIAA-CREF Alternatives Advisors, LLC and Teachers Advisors, Inc., its wholly owned subsidiaries and registered investment advisers and TIAA Henderson Real Estate Limited, its majority-owned subsidiary) have interests in other real estate programs and accounts and also engage in other business activities. As such, they will have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between the Accounts business and these other activities. Also, the Account may be buying properties at the same time as TIAA affiliates that may have similar investment objectives to those of the Account. There is also a risk that TIAA will choose a property that provides lower returns to the Account than a property purchased by TIAA and its affiliates. Further, the Account will likely acquire properties in geographic areas where TIAA and its affiliates own or manage properties. In addition, the Account may desire to sell a property at the same time another TIAA affiliate is selling a property in an overlapping market. Conflicts could also arise because some properties owned or managed by TIAA and its affiliates may compete with the Accounts properties for tenants. Among other things, if one of the TIAA entities attracts a tenant that the Account is competing for, the Account could suffer a loss of revenue due to delays in locating another suitable tenant. TIAA has adopted allocation policies and procedures applicable to the purchasing conflicts scenario, but the resolution of such conflicts may be economically disadvantageous to the Account. As a result of TIAAs and its affiliates obligations to TIAA itself and to other current and potential investment vehicles sponsored by TIAA affiliates with similar objectives to those of the Account, there is no assurance that the Account will be able to take advantage of every attractive investment opportunity that otherwise is in accordance with the Accounts investment objectives.
Liquidity Guarantee. In addition, as discussed elsewhere in this report, the TIAA General Account provides a liquidity guarantee to the Account. While an independent fiduciary is responsible for establishing a trigger point (a percentage of TIAAs ownership of liquidity units beyond which TIAAs ownership may be reduced at the fiduciarys direction), there is no express cap on the amount TIAA may be obligated to fund under this guarantee. Further, the Accounts independent fiduciary oversees any redemption of TIAA liquidity units. TIAAs ownership of liquidity units (including the potential for changes in its levels of ownership in the future) from time to time could result in the perception that TIAA is taking into account its own economic interests while serving as investment manager for the Account. In particular, the value of
21
TIAAs liquidity units fluctuates in the same manner as the value of accumulation units held by all participants. Any perception of a conflict of interest could cause participants to transfer accumulations out of the Account to another investment option, which could have an adverse impact on the Accounts ability to act most optimally upon its investment strategy. For a discussion of the relevant allocation policies and procedures TIAA has established as well as a summary of other conflicts of interest which may arise as a result of TIAAs management of the Account, see Establishing and Managing the Accountthe Role of TIAAConflicts of Interest, in the Accounts prospectus.
NO OPPORTUNITY FOR PRIOR REVIEW OF TRANSACTIONS
Investors do not have the opportunity to evaluate the economic or financial merit of the purchase, sale or financing of a property or other investment before the Account completes the transaction, so investors will need to rely solely on TIAAs judgment and ability to select investments consistent with the Accounts investment objective and policies. Further, the Account may change its investment objective and pursue specific investments in accordance with any such amended investment objective without the consent of the Accounts investors.
RISKS OF REGISTRATION UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940
The Account has not registered, and management intends to continue to operate the Account so that it will not have to register, as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the Investment Company Act). Generally, a company is an investment company and required to register under the Investment Company Act if, among other things, it holds itself out as being engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities, or it is engaged or proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of such companys total assets (exclusive of government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis.
If the Account were obligated to register as an investment company, the Account would have to comply with a variety of substantive requirements under the Investment Company Act that impose, among other things, limitations on capital structure, restrictions on certain investments, compliance with reporting, record keeping, voting and proxy disclosure requirements and other rules and regulations that could significantly increase its operating expenses and reduce its operating flexibility. To maintain compliance with the exemptions from the Investment Company Act, the Account may be unable to sell assets it would otherwise want to sell and may be unable to purchase securities it would otherwise want to purchase, which might materially adversely impact the Accounts performance.
CYBERSECURITY RISKS
With the increased use of technologies such as the Internet to conduct business, the Account and its service providers (including, but not limited to, TIAA, Services, the independent fiduciary and the Accounts custodian and financial intermediaries) are susceptible to cyber security risks. In general, cybersecurity attacks can result from infection by computer viruses or other malicious software or from deliberate actions or unintentional events, including gaining unauthorized access through hacking or other means to digital systems, networks, or devices that are used to service the Accounts operations in order to misappropriate assets or sensitive information, corrupt data, or cause operational disruption. Cybersecurity attacks can also be carried out in a manner that does not require gaining unauthorized access, including by carrying out a denial-of-service attack on the Account or its service providers websites. In addition, authorized persons could inadvertently or intentionally release and possibly destroy confidential or proprietary information stored on the Accounts systems or the systems of its service providers.
Cybersecurity failures by the Account or any of its service providers, or the issuers of any portfolio securities in which the Account invests (e.g., issuers of REIT stocks or debt securities), have the ability to result in disruptions to and impacts on business operations and may adversely affect the Account and the value of accumulation units. Such disruptions or impacts may result in: financial losses; interference with the processing of contract transactions, including the processing of orders from TIAAs website; interference with the Accounts ability to calculate AUVs; barriers to trading and order processing; Account contract owners
22
inability to transact business with the Account; violations of applicable federal and state privacy or other laws, regulatory fines, penalties, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensation costs, or additional compliance costs. The Account may incur additional, incremental costs to prevent and mitigate the risks of cybersecurity attacks or incidents in the future. The Account and its contract owners could be negatively impacted by such cyber-attacks or incidents. Although the Account has established business continuity plans and risk-based processes and controls to address such cybersecurity risks, there are inherent limitations in such plans and systems in part due to the evolving nature of technology and cyber-security attack tactics. As a result, it is possible that the Account or the Accounts service providers will not be able to adequately identify or prepare for all cybersecurity attacks. In addition, the Account cannot directly control the cybersecurity plans or systems implemented by its service providers.
23
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
Not applicable.
THE PROPERTIESGENERAL
In the table below, participants will find general information about each of the Accounts investments as of December 31, 2015. The Accounts investments include both properties that are wholly owned by the Account and properties owned by the Accounts joint venture investments. Certain investments include a portfolio of properties.
OFFICE PROPERTIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Property |
Location |
Year |
Year |
Rentable |
Percent |
Annual Avg. |
Fair |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1001 Pennsylvania Ave |
Washington, D.C. |
1987 |
2004 |
|
|
779,546 |
|
|
81.3% |
|
|
$ |
|
49.64 |
|
|
$ |
|
805.8 |
(4) |
|
|||||||||||||
Colorado Center(6) |
Santa Monica, CA |
1984 |
2004 |
|
|
1,095,620 |
|
|
56.0% |
|
|
44.36 |
|
|
559.3 |
|||||||||||||||||||
99 High Street |
Boston, MA |
1971 |
2005 |
|
|
732,432 |
|
|
95.7% |
|
|
46.48 |
|
|
506.4 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Fourth & Madison |
Seattle, WA |
2002 |
2004 |
|
|
845,533 |
|
|
84.5% |
|
|
28.66 |
|
|
489.3 |
(4) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
501 Boylston Street |
Boston, MA |
1940, 1961 |
2006 |
|
|
610,075 |
|
|
95.2% |
|
|
46.08 |
|
|
434.3 |
|||||||||||||||||||
780 Third Avenue |
New York, NY |
1984 |
1999 |
|
|
497,673 |
|
|
87.0% |
|
|
62.33 |
|
|
420.6 |
(4) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Four Oaks Place LP(14) |
Houston, TX |
1983 |
2012 |
|
|
1,739,056 |
|
|
91.2% |
|
|
21.74 |
|
|
379.5 |
|||||||||||||||||||
701 Brickell Avenue |
Miami, FL |
1986 |
2002 |
|
|
677,667 |
|
|
92.2% |
|
|
41.56 |
|
|
371.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||
55 Second Street |
San Francisco, CA |
2002 |
2014 |
|
|
379,328 |
|
|
96.4% |
|
|
41.78 |
|
|
335.2 |
(4) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
1900 K Street NW |
Washington, D.C. |
1996 |
2004 |
|
|
343,929 |
|
|
90.6% |
|
|
50.19 |
|
|
327.3 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Lincoln Centre |
Dallas, TX |
1984 |
2005 |
|
|
1,625,465 |
|
|
87.0% |
|
|
22.87 |
|
|
315.9 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Wilshire Rodeo Plaza |
Beverly Hills, CA |
1935, 1984 |
2006 |
|
|
248,347 |
|
|
61.8% |
|
|
63.06 |
|
|
302.4 |
|||||||||||||||||||
21 Penn Plaza |
New York, NY |
1931, 2012- 2014 |
2014 |
|
|
373,138 |
|
|
95.4% |
|
|
43.07 |
|
|
270.1 |
|||||||||||||||||||
1401 H Street NW |
Washington, D.C. |
1992 |
2006 |
|
|
350,787 |
|
|
96.1% |
|
|
44.21 |
|
|
242.2 |
(4) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
400 Fairview(13) |
Seattle, WA |
2015 |
2015 |
|
|
349,152 |
|
|
75.5% |
|
|
27.45 |
|
|
235.5 |
|||||||||||||||||||
837 Washington |
New York, NY |
1938, 2012- 2014 |
2015 |
|
|
55,497 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
167.88 |
|
|
205.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||
One Boston Place(7) |
Boston, MA |
1970 |
2002 |
|
|
804,444 |
|
|
88.8% |
|
|
47.63 |
|
|
204.3 |
|||||||||||||||||||
225 Binney Street(20) |
Cambridge, MA |
2013 |
2015 |
|
|
305,212 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
40.50 |
|
|
192.9 |
|||||||||||||||||||
409-499 Illinois Street(21) |
San Francisco, CA |
2008, 2010 |
2015 |
|
|
456,181 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
26.97 |
|
|
190.8 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Foundry Square II(18) |
San Francisco, CA |
2002 |
2014 |
|
|
507,810 |
|
|
99.7% |
|
|
53.09 |
|
|
189.6 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Millennium Corporate Park |
Redmond, WA |
1999, 2000 |
2006 |
|
|
536,884 |
|
|
97.8% |
|
|
18.62 |
|
|
189.5 |
|||||||||||||||||||
88 Kearny Street |
San Francisco, CA |
1986 |
1999 |
|
|
228,359 |
|
|
88.4% |
|
|
49.43 |
|
|
165.4 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Castro Station |
Mountain View, CA |
2000, 2013 |
2015 |
|
|
114,809 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
72.31 |
|
|
150.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Wilton Woods Corporate Campus(5) |
Wilton, CT |
1974, 2001 |
2001 |
|
|
531,606 |
|
|
83.7% |
|
|
24.53 |
|
|
141.3 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Urban Centre |
Tampa, FL |
1984, 1987 |
2005 |
|
|
549,957 |
|
|
85.7% |
|
|
26.20 |
|
|
122.3 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Plaza |
San Diego, CA |
2000, 2002 |
2007 |
|
|
217,890 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
21.86 |
|
|
94.7 |
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Property |
Location |
Year |
Year |
Rentable |
Percent |
Annual Avg. |
Fair |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Ellipse at Ballston |
Arlington, VA |
1989 |
2006 |
|
|
196,691 |
|
|
84.3% |
|
|
$ |
|
39.77 |
|
|
$ |
|
87.5 |
|||||||||||||||
1500 Owens(22) |
San Francisco, CA |
2009 |
2015 |
|
|
158,267 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
35.40 |
|
|
73.5 |
|||||||||||||||||||
3 Hutton Centre Drive |
Santa Ana, CA |
1985 |
2003 |
|
|
198,161 |
|
|
90.5% |
|
|
22.49 |
|
|
57.1 |
|||||||||||||||||||
200 Middlefield Road |
Menlo Park, CA |
1967, 2012- 2013 |
2014 |
|
|
41,933 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
74.00 |
|
|
55.5 |
|||||||||||||||||||
West Lake North Business Park |
Westlake Village, CA |
2000 |
2004 |
|
|
197,366 |
|
|
97.3% |
|
|
27.84 |
|
|
54.4 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Parkview Plaza |
Oakbrook, IL |
1990 |
1997 |
|
|
264,162 |
|
|
83.6% |
|
|
18.55 |
|
|
51.2 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Camelback Center |
Phoenix, AZ |
2001 |
2007 |
|
|
232,615 |
|
|
82.2% |
|
|
24.18 |
|
|
51.1 |
|||||||||||||||||||
8270 Greensboro Drive |
McLean, VA |
2000 |
2005 |
|
|
158,341 |
|
|
91.7% |
|
|
35.81 |
|
|
48.1 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
SubtotalOffice Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
87.8% |
|
|
$ |
|
8,319.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ontario Industrial Portfolio |
Various, CA |
1997-1998 |
1998, 2000, 2004 |
|
|
3,981,894 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
$ |
|
4.42 |
|
|
$ |
|
421.6 |
|||||||||||||||
Dallas Industrial Portfolio |
Dallas and Coppell, TX |
1997-2001 |
2000-2002 |
|
|
3,684,941 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
3.10 |
|
|
193.2 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Portfolio |
Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
2000-2002 |
2000, 2001, 2002, 2004 |
|
|
1,490,235 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
166.1 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Great West Industrial Portfolio |
Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana, CA |
2004-2005 |
2008 |
|
|
1,358,925 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
4.24 |
|
|
158.3 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Southern CA RA Industrial Portfolio |
Los Angeles, CA |
1982 |
2004 |
|
|
920,078 |
|
|
90.1% |
|
|
5.25 |
|
|
119.3 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Cerritos Industrial Park |
Cerritos, CA |
1970-1977 |
2012 |
|
|
934,213 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
5.51 |
|
|
108.7 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Rainier Corporate Park |
Fife, WA |
1991-1997 |
2003 |
|
|
1,104,399 |
|
|
95.9% |
|
|
4.90 |
|
|
96.9 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pinto Business Park |
Houston, TX |
2014, 2015 |
2015 |
|
|
995,920 |
|
|
72.5% |
|
|
4.46 |
|
|
93.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Weston Business Center |
Weston, FL |
1998-1999 |
2011 |
|
|
679,918 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
5.40 |
|
|
88.8 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Seneca Industrial Park |
Pembroke Park, FL |
1999-2001 |
2007 |
|
|
882,182 |
|
|
83.0% |
|
|
6.28 |
|
|
87.9 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Chicago Industrial Portfolio |
Chicago and Joliet, IL |
1997-2000 |
1998, 2000 |
|
|
1,427,748 |
|
|
93.3% |
|
|
3.53 |
|
|
84.1 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Mohawk Distribution Center |
Teterboro, NJ |
1958, 1974 |
2013 |
|
|
616,992 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
7.60 |
|
|
81.9 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Shawnee Ridge Industrial Portfolio |
Atlanta, GA |
2000-2005 |
2005 |
|
|
1,422,922 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
3.49 |
|
|
81.4 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Regal Logistics Campus |
Seattle, WA |
1999-2004 |
2005 |
|
|
968,535 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
4.06 |
|
|
78.2 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Oakmont IE West Portfolio |
Fontana, CA |
2014-2015 |
2015 |
|
|
709,941 |
|
|
56.1% |
|
|
4.52 |
|
|
76.2 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Chicago Caleast Industrial Portfolio |
Chicago, IL |
1974, 2005 |
2003 |
|
|
1,145,152 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
4.19 |
|
|
73.1 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Northern CA RA Industrial Portfolio |
Oakland, CA |
1981 |
2004 |
|
|
657,602 |
|
|
95.5% |
|
|
5.40 |
|
|
69.5 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Northwest Houston Industrial Portfolio |
Houston, TX |
1981 |
2014 |
|
|
1,010,912 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
4.13 |
|
|
68.8 |
|||||||||||||||||||
South River Road Industrial |
Cranbury, NJ |
1999 |
2001 |
|
|
858,957 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
4.56 |
|
|
68.3 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta Industrial Portfolio |
Lawrenceville, GA |
1996-1999 |
2000 |
|
|
1,295,440 |
|
|
91.1% |
|
|
2.89 |
|
|
58.5 |
|||||||||||||||||||
200 Milik Street |
Carteret, NJ |
2013 |
2015 |
|
|
232,134 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
10.55 |
|
|
50.1 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Ontario Mills Industrial Portfolio |
Ontario, CA |
2014 |
2014 |
|
|
435,733 |
|
|
50.4% |
|
|
4.92 |
|
|
48.6 |
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Property |
Location |
Year |
Year |
Rentable |
Percent |
Annual Avg. |
Fair |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Industrial Portfolio |
Grapevine, TX |
2003, 2004, 2006 |
2006 |
|
|
899,200 |
|
|
91.8% |
|
|
$ |
|
3.11 |
|
|
$ |
|
46.7 |
|||||||||||||||
Stevenson Point |
Newark, CA |
2000 |
2015 |
|
|
312,885 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
10.22 |
|
|
41.6 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Centre Pointe and Valley View |
Los Angeles County, CA |
1965, 1989 |
2004 |
|
|
307,685 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
5.87 |
|
|
41.3 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Northeast RA Industrial Portfolio |
Boston, MA |
2000 |
2004 |
|
|
384,126 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
6.10 |
|
|
39.6 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Landover Logistics |
Landover, MD |
2013 |
2014 |
|
|
360,550 |
|
|
46.4% |
|
|
7.75 |
|
|
38.3 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Corporate Park |
Fife, WA |
2006 |
2012 |
|
|
388,783 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
3.97 |
|
|
36.9 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Northwest RA Industrial Portfolio |
Seattle, WA |
1996 |
2004 |
|
|
312,321 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
5.36 |
|
|
29.5 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Beltway North Commerce Center |
Houston, TX |
2014 |
2015 |
|
|
352,000 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
23.4 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Park 10 Distribution |
Houston, TX |
1980 |
2014 |
|
|
152,638 |
|
|
91.2% |
|
|
4.61 |
|
|
12.6 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
SubtotalIndustrial Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
93.5% |
|
|
$ |
|
2,682.4 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
RETAIL PROPERTIES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Florida Mall(9) |
Orlando, FL |
1986 |
2002 |
|
|
1,034,449 |
|
|
96.2% |
|
|
$ |
|
55.32 |
|
|
$ |
|
644.5 |
|||||||||||||||
DDR Joint Venture(8) |
Various, U.S. |
Various |
2007 |
|
|
8,631,804 |
|
|
92.8% |
|
|
12.65 |
|
|
488.8 |
|||||||||||||||||||
The Forum at Carlsbad |
Carlsbad, CA |
2003 |
2011 |
|
|
263,068 |
|
|
97.0% |
|
|
36.89 |
|
|
215.0 |
(4) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Florida Retail Portfolio(10) |
Various, FL |
1974, 2005 |
2006 |
|
|
442,456 |
|
|
95.7% |
|
|
21.04 |
|
|
136.5 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Miami International Mall(9) |
Miami, FL |
1982 |
2002 |
|
|
305,170 |
|
|
96.9% |
|
|
47.40 |
|
|
134.1 |
|||||||||||||||||||
West Town Mall(9) |
Knoxville, TN |
1972 |
2002 |
|
|
960,975 |
|
|
97.2% |
|
|
19.68 |
|
|
128.2 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Westwood Marketplace |
Los Angeles, CA |
1950 |
2002 |
|
|
202,202 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
30.39 |
|
|
125.3 |
|||||||||||||||||||
The Shops at Wisconsin Place |
Chevy Chase, MD |
2007-2010 |
2012 |
|
|
117,202 |
|
|
93.9% |
|
|
50.54 |
|
|
123.1 |
(15) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Valencia Town Center(17) |
Valencia, CA |
1991 |
2012 |
|
|
1,071,103 |
|
|
97.2% |
|
|
17.57 |
|
|
120.5 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Marketfair |
West Windsor, NJ |
1987 |
2006 |
|
|
242,662 |
|
|
95.7% |
|
|
29.71 |
|
|
106.5 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Plaza America |
Reston, VA |
1995 |
2014 |
|
|
164,398 |
|
|
89.9% |
|
|
28.40 |
|
|
106.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Mazza Gallerie |
Washington, D.C. |
1975 |
2004 |
|
|
294,112 |
|
|
86.8% |
|
|
14.19 |
|
|
92.8 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Charleston Plaza |
Mountain View, CA |
2006 |
2012 |
|
|
132,590 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
34.29 |
|
|
88.0 |
(4) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
South Denver Marketplace |
Denver, CO |
1996-1998 |
2013 |
|
|
261,135 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
15.89 |
|
|
70.8 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Publix at Weston Commons |
Weston, FL |
2005 |
2006 |
|
|
126,922 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
28.05 |
|
|
68.2 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Northpark Village Square |
Valencia, CA |
1996 |
2011 |
|
|
87,094 |
|
|
95.5% |
|
|
29.30 |
|
|
47.6 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Southside at McEwen |
Franklin, TN |
2012 |
2014 |
|
|
92,470 |
|
|
98.6% |
|
|
26.01 |
|
|
47.6 |
|||||||||||||||||||
401 West 14th Street(19) |
New York, NY |
1923, 2007 |
2014 |
|
|
62,200 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
145.87 |
|
|
38.9 |
|||||||||||||||||||
1619 Walnut Street |
Philadelphia, PA |
1937, 2013 |
2013 |
|
|
34,047 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
38.96 |
|
|
23.2 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
SubtotalRetail Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
94.5% |
|
|
$ |
|
2,805.6 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
OTHER COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
425 Park Avenue(11) |
New York, NY |
N/A |
2011 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
|
440.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
Storage Portfolio(12) |
Various, U.S. |
1972, 1990 |
2003 |
|
|
1,676,992 |
|
|
92.1% |
|
|
17.52 |
|
|
132.9 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SubtotalOther Commercial Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
572.9 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
SubtotalCommercial Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
92.3% |
|
|
$ |
|
14,379.9 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Property |
Location |
Year |
Year |
Rentable |
Percent |
Annual Avg. |
Fair |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Palomino Park |
Highlands Ranch, CO |
1996-2001 |
2005 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
92.4% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$302.6 |
(4) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
The Corner |
New York, NY |
2010 |
2011 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
93.4% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
265.0 |
(4) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
The Colorado |
New York, NY |
1987 |
1999 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
94.0% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
263.6 |
(4) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
The Woodley |
Washington, D.C. |
2014 |
2014 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
83.0% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
203.3 |
|||||||||||||||||||
MiMA(16) |
New York, NY |
2010 |
2012 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
95.2% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
199.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||
The Louis at 14th |
Washington, D.C. |
2013-2014 |
2014 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
86.6% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
182.6 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Houston Apartment Portfolio |
Houston, TX |
1984-2004 |
2006 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
95.5% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
175.5 |
|||||||||||||||||||
250 North 10th Street |
Brooklyn, NY |
2014 |
2015 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
85.5% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
171.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Stella |
Marina Del Rey, CA |
2013 |
2013 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
93.4% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
170.8 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Mass Court |
Washington, D.C. |
2004 |
2012 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
95.7% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
169.1 |
(4) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
The Manor at Flagler Village |
Fort Lauderdale, FL |
2014 |
2015 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
89.5% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
150.5 |
|||||||||||||||||||
The Legacy at Westwood |
Los Angeles, CA |
2001 |
2002 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
96.3% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
141.4 |
(4) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Larkspur Courts |
Larkspur, CA |
1991 |
1999 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
91.5% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
135.9 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Holly Street Village |
Pasadena, CA |
1997 |
2013 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
87.2% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
130.7 |
|||||||||||||||||||
The Palatine |
Arlington, VA |
2008 |
2011 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
92.4% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
126.9 |
(4) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Kierland Apartment Portfolio |
Scottsdale, AZ |
1996-2000 |
2006 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
90.4% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
119.7 |
(4) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Ashford Meadows Apartments |
Herndon, VA |
1998 |
2000 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
92.5% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
106.0 |
(4) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
UnionSouth Lake Union |
Seattle, WA |
2012 |
2015 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
82.4% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
105.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||
South Florida Apartment Portfolio |
Boca Raton and Plantation, FL |
1986 |
2001 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
94.0% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
93.1 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Casa Palma |
Coconut Creek, FL |
2014 |
2015 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
94.9% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
92.7 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Township Apartments |
Redwood City, CA |
2014 |
2014 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
94.7% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
88.4 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Circa Green Lake |
Seattle, WA |
2009 |
2012 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
92.5% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
87.9 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Residence at Rivers Edge |
Medford, MA |
2009 |
2011 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
93.2% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
87.5 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Regents Court |
San Diego, CA |
2001 |
2002 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
92.8% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
87.1 |
(4) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Oceano at Warner Center |
Woodland Hill, CA |
2012 |
2013 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
94.3% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
82.5 |
|||||||||||||||||||
The Caruth |
Dallas, TX |
1999 |
2005 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
95.3% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
81.8 |
(4) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
The Residences at the Village of Merrick Park |
Coral Gables, FL |
2003 |
2012 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
96.7% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
71.7 |
|||||||||||||||||||
The Maroneal |
Houston, TX |
1998 |
2005 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
91.6% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
57.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||
The Manor Apartments |
Plantation, FL |
2013 |
2014 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
93.4% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
54.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||
The Pepper Building |
Philadelphia, PA |
1927, 2010 |
2011 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
94.6% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
53.2 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Prescott Wallingford Apartments |
Seattle, WA |
2012 |
2012 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
92.2% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
58.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||
The Cordelia |
Portland, OR |
2014 |
2015 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
91.1% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
48.5 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Cliffs at Barton Creek |
Austin, TX |
1994 |
2013 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
92.9% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
46.4 |
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Property |
Location |
Year |
Year |
Rentable |
Percent |
Annual Avg. |
Fair |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Westcreek |
Westlake Village, CA |
1988 |
1997 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
88.1% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
|
45.1 |
|||||||||||||||||
The Ashton |
Washington, D.C. |
2009 |
2015 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
85.7% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
41.2 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
SubtotalResidential Properties |
|
|
92.0% |
|
|
$ |
|
4,294.7 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
TotalAll PropertiesPercent Leased |
|
|
92.2% |
|
|
$ |
|
18,674.6 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The square footage is an approximate measure and is subject to periodic remeasurement. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) |
Based on total contractual rent for leases existing as of December 31, 2015. The contractual rent can be either on a gross or net basis, depending on the terms of the leases. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) |
Fair value reflects the value determined in accordance with the procedures described in the Accounts prospectus and as stated in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) |
Property is subject to a mortgage. The fair value shown represents the Accounts interest gross of debt. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(5) |
Investment was formerly named Ten & Twenty Westport Road. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(6) |
This property is held in a joint venture with EOP Operating LP. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Accounts 50% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(7) |
The Account owns a 50.25% interest in a private REIT, which owns this property. A 49.70% interest is owned by Societe Immobiler Trans-Quebec, and 0.05% is owned by 100 individuals. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Accounts interest in the joint venture. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(8) |
This investment is held in a joint venture with DDR Corp. and consists of 25 properties located in 11 states. Fair Value shown reflects the value of the Accounts 85% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(9) |
These investments are held in a joint venture with the Simon Property Group. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Accounts 50% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(10) |
This investment is held in a joint venture with Weingarten Realty Investors and contains two neighborhood and/or community shopping centers located in the Orlando and Tampa, Florida areas. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Accounts 80% interest in the joint venture. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(11) |
Represents a fee interest encumbered by a ground lease real estate investment. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(12) |
This investment is held in a joint venture with Storage USA. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Accounts 75% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(13) |
This property is held in a joint venture with SCD 400 Fairview, LLC. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Accounts 90% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(14) |
This property is held in a joint venture with Allianz US Private REIT LP. Fair value shown reflects the Accounts 51% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(15) |
Fair value shown reflects both the retail property and the Accounts 33.3% interest in a joint venture investment. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(16) |
This property is held in a joint venture with RGM 42 LLC. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Accounts 70% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(17) |
This property is held in a joint venture with Valencia Town Center Associates LP. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Accounts 50% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(18) |
This property is held in a joint venture with Norges Bank Investment Management. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Accounts 50.1% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(19) |
This property is held in a joint venture with Taconic Investment Partners LLC. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Accounts 42.2% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(20) |
This property is held in a joint venture with ARE - MA Region No. 54 LLC. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Accounts 70% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(21) |
This property is held in a joint venture with Alexandria Real Estate Equities. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Accounts 40% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(22) |
This property is held in a joint venture with Alexandria Real Estate Equities. Fair value shown reflects the value of the Accounts 49.9% interest in the joint venture, net of debt. |
28
Commercial (Non-Residential) Investments
At December 31, 2015, the Account held 88 commercial (non-residential) investments in its portfolio, including a portfolio of storage facilities located throughout the United States. Eighteen of these investments were held through joint ventures, and 16 were subject to mortgages (including nine joint venture investments). Although the terms vary under each lease, certain expenses, such as real estate taxes and other operating expenses are paid or reimbursed in whole or in part by the tenants.
Management believes that the Accounts portfolio is diversified by both property type and geographic location. The portfolio consists of:
|
Office. 34 investments containing approximately 16.4 million square feet located in ten states and the District of Columbia. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Industrial. 32 investments containing approximately 30.3 million square feet located in nine states. One of the industrial investments no longer contains an active property but the joint venture investment has not been dissolved; it is not included in the square footage or fair value calculation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Retail. 20 investments containing approximately 14.5 million square feet located in 15 states and the District of Columbia. One of the retail investments is an 85% interest in a portfolio containing 25 individual retail shopping centers primarily located throughout the Eastern and Southern regions. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other-Land (425 Park Avenue). The Account has a leasehold interest real estate investment encumbered by a ground lease located in New York, NY. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other-Storage. The Account has a 75% interest in a portfolio of storage facilities located throughout the United States containing approximately 1.7 million square feet. |
Major Tenants: The following tables list the Accounts ten most significant tenants based on the total space they occupied as of December 31, 2015 in each of the Accounts commercial property types.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Major Office Tenants |
Occupied Sq. Ft. |
% of |
% of |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
BHP Petroleum (Americas), Inc.(1) |
|
|
782,956 |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
||||||||
Microsoft Corporation(2) |
|
|
479,193 |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
||||||||
Crowell & Moring LLP(2) |
|
|
399,471 |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
||||||||
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation(3)(4) |
|
|
374,610 |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
||||||||
Atmos Energy Corporation(2) |
|
|
312,238 |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
||||||||
Biogen MA Inc(1) |
|
|
305,212 |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
||||||||
Fibrogen Inc(1) |
|
|
234,249 |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
||||||||
Bridgewater Associates LP(1) |
|
|
227,883 |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
||||||||
Pearson Education, Inc.(2) |
|
|
225,299 |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
||||||||
Orrick Herrington Sutcliffe LLP(1) |
|
|
216,291 |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Major Industrial Tenants |
Occupied Sq. Ft. |
% of |
% of |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.(2) |
|
|
1,099,112 |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
||||||||
Regal West Corporation(2) |
|
|
1,022,989 |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
||||||||
Restoration Hardware, Inc.(2) |
|
|
886,052 |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
||||||||
Kumho Tire U.S.A. Inc.(2) |
|
|
830,485 |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
||||||||
Exel Inc(2) |
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
||||||||
Del Monte Fresh Produce, N.A., Inc.(2) |
|
|
689,660 |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
||||||||
R.R Donnelley & Sons Company(2) |
|
|
659,157 |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
||||||||
Rheem Sales Company, Inc.(2) |
|
|
656,600 |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
||||||||
Global Equipment Company, Inc.(2) |
|
|
647,228 |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
||||||||
Mohawk Carpet Distribution LP(2) |
|
|
616,992 |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Major Retail Tenants |
Occupied Sq. Ft. |
% of |
% of |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dicks Sporting Goods, Inc.(1) |
|
|
415,902 |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
||||||||
Kohls Corporation(1) |
|
|
349,777 |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
||||||||
Ross Stores, Inc.(1) |
|
|
346,072 |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
||||||||
PetSmart, Inc.(3) |
|
|
332,745 |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
||||||||
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc (1) |
|
|
327,027 |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
||||||||
Sears, Roebuck & Co. (1) |
|
|
304,465 |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
||||||||
Michaels Stores, Inc.(3) |
|
|
267,821 |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
||||||||
Best Buy Co., Inc.(3) |
|
|
266,891 |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
||||||||
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.(2) |
|
|
258,509 |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
||||||||
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.(3) |
|
|
239,347 |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
(1) |
Tenant occupied space within joint venture investments. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) |
Tenant occupied space within wholly owned property investments. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) |
Tenant occupied space within wholly owned property investments and joint venture investments. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) |
Tenant occupied space within an investment that has been sold subsequent to date of this report. |
The following tables list the rentable area for long term leases subject to expiring leases during the next ten years and an aggregate figure for expirations in 2026 and after, in the Accounts commercial (non-residential) properties that are both wholly owned by the Account and held within the Accounts joint venture investments. While many of the leases contain renewal options with varying terms, these charts assume that none of the tenants exercise their renewal options, including those with terms that expired on December 31, 2015 or are month to month leases.
Office Properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year of |
Number of |
Rental Income |
Expiring Rent as |
Rentable Area |
% of |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 |
|
|
165 |
|
|
$ |
|
30.7 |
|
|
2.4% |
|
|
1,540,020 |
|
|
9.4% |
||||||||||||||||||
2017 |
|
|
144 |
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
1.7% |
|
|
1,189,415 |
|
|
7.3% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2018 |
|
|
129 |
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
2.4% |
|
|
1,793,062 |
|
|
10.9% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2019 |
|
|
88 |
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
2.3% |
|
|
1,400,565 |
|
|
8.5% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2020 |
|
|
97 |
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
3.1% |
|
|
1,463,484 |
|
|
8.9% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2021 |
|
|
63 |
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
1.5% |
|
|
1,682,837 |
|
|
10.3% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2022 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
1.2% |
|
|
908,128 |
|
|
5.5% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2023 |
|
|
27 |
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
1.5% |
|
|
635,624 |
|
|
3.9% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2024 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
1.5% |
|
|
910,237 |
|
|
5.5% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2025 |
|
|
39 |
|
|
50.9 |
|
|
3.9% |
|
|
1,609,026 |
|
|
9.8% |
||||||||||||||||||||
Thereafter |
|
|
30 |
|
|
91.8 |
|
|
7.1% |
|
|
1,267,258 |
|
|
7.7% |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
|
|
853 |
|
|
$ |
|
369.5 |
|
|
28.6% |
|
|
14,399,656 |
|
|
87.7% |
30
Industrial Properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year of |
Number of |
Rental Income |
Expiring Rent as |
Rentable Area |
% of |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
$ |
|
10.0 |
|
|
0.8% |
|
|
4,304,348 |
|
|
14.2% |
||||||||||||||||||
2017 |
|
|
87 |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
0.6% |
|
|
3,315,413 |
|
|
10.9% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2018 |
|
|
80 |
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
0.9% |
|
|
5,490,494 |
|
|
18.1% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2019 |
|
|
53 |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
0.5% |
|
|
2,039,941 |
|
|
6.7% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2020 |
|
|
52 |
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
1.2% |
|
|
5,624,321 |
|
|
18.6% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2021 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
0.5% |
|
|
3,164,835 |
|
|
10.5% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2022 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
0.6% |
|
|
3,165,221 |
|
|
10.5% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2023 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
0.2% |
|
|
1,122,691 |
|
|
3.7% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2024 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
0.1% |
|
|
690,208 |
|
|
2.3% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2025 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
0.3% |
|
|
460,410 |
|
|
1.5% |
||||||||||||||||||||
Thereafter |
|
|
3 |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
0.1% |
|
|
108,627 |
|
|
0.4% |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
|
|
415 |
|
|
$ |
|
74.0 |
|
|
5.8% |
|
|
29,486,509 |
|
|
97.4% |
Retail Properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year of |
Number of |
Rental Income |
Expiring Rent as |
Rentable Area |
% of |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 |
|
|
278 |
|
|
$ |
|
16.0 |
|
|
1.2% |
|
|
2,263,764 |
|
|
15.6% |
||||||||||||||||||
2017 |
|
|
245 |
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
1.0% |
|
|
1,737,169 |
|
|
12.0% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2018 |
|
|
224 |
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
1.3% |
|
|
1,622,571 |
|
|
11.2% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2019 |
|
|
195 |
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
1.1% |
|
|
1,622,322 |
|
|
11.2% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2020 |
|
|
209 |
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
1.2% |
|
|
1,429,405 |
|
|
9.8% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2021 |
|
|
162 |
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
0.9% |
|
|
1,542,349 |
|
|
10.6% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2022 |
|
|
87 |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
0.5% |
|
|
1,011,227 |
|
|
7.0% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2023 |
|
|
101 |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
0.7% |
|
|
713,429 |
|
|
4.9% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2024 |
|
|
78 |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
0.7% |
|
|
576,427 |
|
|
4.0% |
||||||||||||||||||||
2025 |
|
|
107 |
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
1.3% |
|
|
861,453 |
|
|
5.9% |
||||||||||||||||||||
Thereafter |
|
|
59 |
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
2.6% |
|
|
843,032 |
|
|
5.8% |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
|
|
1,745 |
|
|
$ |
|
161.1 |
|
|
12.5% |
|
|
14,223,148 |
|
|
98.0% |
(1) |
Rental income includes income from wholly owned properties, which is shown as Rental income on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, as well as income from properties held in joint venture investments, which is included in Income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
Certain leases provide for additional rental amounts based upon the recovery of actual operating expenses in excess of specified base amounts, sales volume or contractual increases as defined in the lease agreement. These contractual contingent rentals are not included in the table above.
31
The following table details the leasing activity during the year ended December 31, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Leasing Activity |
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||||
Vacant space beginning of year |
|
|
5,926,550 |
|
|
||||
Vacant space acquired during the year |
|
|
1,023,143 |
|
|
||||
Vacant space disposed of during the year |
|
|
(904,848) |
|
|
||||
Vacant space placed into service during the year |
|
|
(11,327,091) |
|
|
||||
Expiring leases during the year |
|
|
10,143,014 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|||||||
Vacant space end of year |
|
|
4,860,768 |
|
|
||||
|
|||||||||
Average remaining lease term* |
|
|
47 Months |
|
|
* |
Includes office, industrial and retail properties. |
Based on leases in place at December 31, 2015, leases representing approximately 12.9% of net rentable area are scheduled to expire throughout 2016. Rents associated with such lease expirations are generally at or below prevailing market rents in the Accounts primary metropolitan markets.
Residential Properties
The Accounts residential property investment portfolio consisted of 35 properties as of December 31, 2015, comprised of first class or luxury multi-family, garden, mid-rise, and high-rise apartment buildings, including one investment held in a joint venture. The portfolio contains approximately 11,000 units located in 11 states and the District of Columbia. The portfolio was 92.0% leased as of December 31, 2015. Eleven of the residential properties in the portfolio are subject to mortgages, including one joint venture investment. The complexes generally contain one to three bedroom apartment units with a range of amenities, such as patios or balconies, washers and dryers, and central air conditioning. Many of these apartment communities have on-site fitness facilities, including some with swimming pools. Rents on each of the properties tend to be comparable with competitive communities and are not subject to rent regulation. The Account is responsible for the expenses of operating its residential properties. As of December 31, 2015, the Accounts residential properties had an aggregate fair value of approximately $4.3 billion.
32
The following table contains detailed information regarding the apartment complexes in the Accounts portfolio as of December 31, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Property |
Location |
Number |
Average |
Avg. Rent |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Palomino Park(1) |
Highlands Ranch, CO |
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
$ |
|
1,745 |
|||||||||||
Houston Apartment Portfolio(1) |
Houston, TX |
|
|
877 |
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
1,723 |
|||||||||||||
Kierland Apartment Portfolio(1) |
Scottsdale, AZ |
|
|
724 |
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
1,176 |
|||||||||||||
South Florida Apartment Portfolio(1) |
Boca Raton and Plantation, FL |
|
|
550 |
|
|
889 |
|
|
1,453 |
|||||||||||||
MiMA |
New York, NY |
|
|
500 |
|
|
740 |
|
|
5,024 |
|||||||||||||
Ashford Meadows Apartments |
Herndon, VA |
|
|
440 |
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
1,588 |
|||||||||||||
The Manor at Flagler Village |
Fort Lauderdale, FL |
|
|
382 |
|
|
964 |
|
|
2,271 |
|||||||||||||
Holly Street Village |
Pasadena, CA |
|
|
374 |
|
|
875 |
|
|
2,051 |
|||||||||||||
Mass Court |
Washington, DC |
|
|
371 |
|
|
834 |
|
|
2,394 |
|||||||||||||
Casa Palma |
Coconut Creek, FL |
|
|
350 |
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
2,010 |
|||||||||||||
The Caruth |
Dallas, TX |
|
|
338 |
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
1,893 |
|||||||||||||
The Maroneal |
Houston, TX |
|
|
309 |
|
|
928 |
|
|
1,566 |
|||||||||||||
UnionSouth Lake Union |
Seattle, WA |
|
|
284 |
|
|
696 |
|
|
1,854 |
|||||||||||||
The Louis at 14th |
Washington, DC |
|
|
268 |
|
|
665 |
|
|
2,818 |
|||||||||||||
The Palatine |
Arlington, VA |
|
|
262 |
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
2,706 |
|||||||||||||
Regents Court |
San Diego, CA |
|
|
251 |
|
|
886 |
|
|
1,986 |
|||||||||||||
Larkspur Courts |
Larkspur, CA |
|
|
248 |
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
2,849 |
|||||||||||||
Stella |
Marina Del Rey, CA |
|
|
244 |
|
|
970 |
|
|
3,216 |
|||||||||||||
Oceano at Warner Center |
Woodland Hill, CA |
|
|
244 |
|
|
935 |
|
|
2,035 |
|||||||||||||
250 North 10th Street |
Brooklyn, NY |
|
|
234 |
|
|
676 |
|
|
3,093 |
|||||||||||||
Residences at Rivers Edge |
Medford, MA |
|
|
222 |
|
|
955 |
|
|
2,628 |
|||||||||||||
The Woodley |
Washington, DC |
|
|
212 |
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
5,083 |
|||||||||||||
Cliffs at Barton Creek |
Austin, TX |
|
|
210 |
|
|
952 |
|
|
1,595 |
|||||||||||||
The Colorado |
New York, NY |
|
|
204 |
|
|
666 |
|
|
4,568 |
|||||||||||||
Circa Green Lake |
Seattle, WA |
|
|
199 |
|
|
765 |
|
|
2,052 |
|||||||||||||
The Manor |
Plantation, FL |
|
|
197 |
|
|
977 |
|
|
2,008 |
|||||||||||||
The Corner |
New York, NY |
|
|
196 |
|
|
837 |
|
|
6,157 |
|||||||||||||
The Legacy at Westwood |
Los Angeles, CA |
|
|
187 |
|
|
1,181 |
|
|
4,176 |
|||||||||||||
The Pepper Building |
Philadelphia, PA |
|
|
185 |
|
|
820 |
|
|
2,053 |
|||||||||||||
Prescott Wallingford Apartments |
Seattle, WA |
|
|
154 |
|
|
665 |
|
|
1,754 |
|||||||||||||
The Cordelia |
Portland, OR |
|
|
135 |
|
|
667 |
|
|
1,657 |
|||||||||||||
Township Apartments |
Redwood City, CA |
|
|
132 |
|
|
914 |
|
|
3,479 |
|||||||||||||
Westcreek |
Westlake Village, CA |
|
|
126 |
|
|
951 |
|
|
2,265 |
|||||||||||||
The Residences at the Village of Merrick Park |
Coral Gables, FL |
|
|
120 |
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
3,493 |
|||||||||||||
The Ashton |
Washington, D.C. |
|
|
49 |
|
|
1,631 |
|
|
4,743 |
(1) |
Represents a portfolio containing multiple properties. |
The Account is party to various claims and routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Management of the Account does not believe that the results of any such claims or litigation, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material effect on the Accounts business, financial position or results of operations.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not applicable.
33
Market Information. There is no established public trading market for securities issued by the Account. Accumulation units in the Account are sold to eligible participants at the Accounts current accumulation unit value, which is based on the value of the Accounts then current net assets and are redeemable in accordance with the terms of the participants contract. For the period from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015, the high and low accumulation unit values for the Account were $362.925 and $335.860, respectively. For the period January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014, the high and low accumulation unit values for the Account were $335.910 and $298.817, respectively.
Holders. The approximate number of Account contract owners at December 31, 2015 was 1,030,000.
Dividends. Not applicable.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans. Not applicable.
Use of Proceeds. Not applicable.
Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer. Not applicable.
34
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
The following selected financial data should be considered in conjunction with the Accounts consolidated financial statements and notes provided in this Form 10-K (amounts in millions except for per accumulation unit amounts).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Years Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate income, net |
|
|
$ |
|
486.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
457.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
391.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
388.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
435.6 |
||||||||||
Income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships |
|
|
140.1 |
|
|
148.1 |
|
|
104.7 |
|
|
80.9 |
|
|
86.4 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends and interest |
|
|
57.6 |
|
|
47.7 |
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
35.3 |
|
|
22.4 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total investment income |
|
|
683.9 |
|
|
652.8 |
|
|
540.8 |
|
|
504.9 |
|
|
544.4 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses |
|
|
182.9 |
|
|
163.0 |
|
|
145.1 |
|
|
136.7 |
|
|
121.3 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment income, net |
|
|
501.0 |
|
|
489.8 |
|
|
395.7 |
|
|
368.2 |
|
|
423.1 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gains on investments and mortgage loans payable |
|
|
1,145.4 |
|
|
1,628.4 |
|
|
1,060.2 |
|
|
1,011.2 |
|
|
1,076.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
|
|
1,646.4 |
|
|
2,118.2 |
|
|
1,455.9 |
|
|
1,379.4 |
|
|
1,499.1 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Participant transactions, net |
|
|
884.6 |
|
|
802.9 |
|
|
916.3 |
|
|
894.8 |
|
|
1,225.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||
TIAA redemption of Liquidity Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(325.4 |
) |
|
|
|
(940.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets |
|
|
$ |
|
2,531.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
2,921.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
2,046.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
1,333.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
2,724.1 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Years Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
|
|
$ |
|
24,399.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
22,408.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
19,417.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
17,378.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
15,749.9 |
||||||||||
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,039.4 |
|
|
2,579.7 |
|
|
2,509.2 |
|
|
2,517.5 |
|
|
2,222.7 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net assets |
|
|
$ |
|
22,360.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
19,829.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
16,907.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
14,861.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
13,527.2 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of per accumulation unit amounts |
|
|
60.4 |
|
|
57.9 |
|
|
55.3 |
|
|
53.3 |
|
|
53.4 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, per accumulation unit |
|
|
$ |
|
362.773 |
|
|
$ |
|
335.393 |
|
|
$ |
|
298.872 |
|
|
$ |
|
272.569 |
|
|
$ |
|
247.654 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans payable |
|
|
$ |
|
1,794.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
2,373.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
2,279.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
2,282.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
2,028.2 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
Quarterly Selected Financial Data
The following quarterly selected unaudited financial data for each full quarter of 2015 and 2014 are derived from the consolidated financial statements of the Account for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 (amounts in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015 |
Year Ended |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31 |
June 30 |
September 30 |
December 31 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment income, net |
|
|
$ |
|
103.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
125.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
135.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
136.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
501.0 |
||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments and mortgage loans payable |
|
|
490.4 |
|
|
149.3 |
|
|
287.2 |
|
|
218.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
1,145.4 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
|
|
$ |
|
593.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
275.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
422.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
354.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
1,646.4 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total return |
|
|
2.98 |
% |
|
|
|
1.33 |
% |
|
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
|
|
1.63 |
% |
|
|
|
8.16 |
% |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014 |
Year Ended |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31 |
June 30 |
September 30 |
December 31 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment income, net |
|
|
$ |
|
106.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
128.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
124.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
129.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
489.8 |
||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments and mortgage loans payable |
|
|
289.1 |
|
|
457.5 |
|
|
303.2 |
|
|
578.6 |
|
|
1,628.4 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
|
|
$ |
|
396.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
586.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
427.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
708.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
2,118.2 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total return |
|
|
2.33 |
% |
|
|
|
3.32 |
% |
|
|
|
2.32 |
% |
|
|
|
3.73 |
% |
|
|
|
12.22 |
% |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and notes contained in this report and with consideration to the sub-section entitled Forward-looking Statements, which begins below, and the section entitled Item 1A. Risk Factors. The past performance of the Account is not indicative of future results.
Forward-looking Statements
Some statements in this Form 10-K which are not historical facts may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include statements about managements expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies for the future, include the assumptions and beliefs underlying these forward-looking statements, and are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the real estate industry, domestic and global economic conditions, including conditions in the credit and capital markets, the sectors, and markets in which the Account invests and operates, and the transactions described in this Form 10-K. While management believes the assumptions underlying any of its forward-looking statements and information to be reasonable, such information may be subject to uncertainties and may involve certain risks which may be difficult to predict and are beyond managements control. These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
Acquiring and Owning Real Estate: The risks associated with acquiring and owning real property, including general economic and real estate market conditions, the availability of, and economic cost associated with, financing the Accounts properties, the risk that the Accounts properties become too concentrated (whether by geography, sector or by tenant mix), competition for acquiring real estate properties, leasing risk (including tenant defaults) and the risk of uninsured losses at properties (including due to terrorism, natural disasters, and acts of violence); |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Selling Real Estate: The risk that the sales price of a property might differ, perhaps significantly, from its estimated or appraised value, leading to losses or reduced profits to the Account, the risk that the Account might not be able to sell a property at a particular time for a price which management believes represents its fair or full value, the risk of a lack of availability of financing (for potential purchasers of the Accounts properties), risks associated with disruptions in the credit and capital markets, and the risk that the Account may be required to make significant expenditures before the Account is able to market and/or sell a property; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Valuation: The risks associated with property valuations, including the fact that appraisals can be subjective in a number of respects and the fact that the Accounts appraisals are generally obtained on a quarterly basis and there may be periods in between appraisals of a property during which the value attributed to the property for purposes of the Accounts daily accumulation unit value may be more or less than the actual realizable value of the property; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Borrowing: Risks associated with financing the Accounts properties, including the risk of default on loans secured by the Accounts properties (which could lead to foreclosure), the risk associated with high loan to value ratios on the Accounts properties (including the fact that the Account may have limited, or no net value in such a property), the risk that significant sums of cash could be required to make principal and interest payments on the loans and the risk that the Account may not have the ability to obtain financing or refinancing on favorable terms (or at all), which may be aggravated by general disruptions in credit and capital markets; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Participant Transactions and Cash Management: Investment risk associated with participant transactions, in particular that (i) significant net participant transfers out of the Account may impair our ability to pursue or consummate new investment opportunities that are otherwise attractive to the Account and/ or may result in sales of real estate-related assets to generate liquidity, (ii) significant net participant transfers into the Account may result, on a temporary basis, in our cash holdings and/or holdings in liquid real estate-related investments exceeding our long-term targeted holding levels and |
37
|
(iii) high levels of cash in the Account during times of appreciating real estate values can impair the Accounts overall return; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joint Venture Investments: The risks associated with joint ventures organized as limited partnerships or limited liability companies, as applicable, including the risk that a co-venturer may have interests or goals inconsistent with that of the Account, that a co-venturer may have financial difficulties, and the risk that the Account may have limited rights with respect to operation of the property and transfer of the Accounts interest; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Regulatory Matters: Uncertainties associated with environmental liability and regulations and other governmental regulatory matters such as zoning laws, rent control laws, and property taxes; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign Investments: The risks associated with purchasing, owning and disposing foreign investments (primarily real estate properties), including political risk, the risk associated with currency fluctuations (whether hedged or not), regulatory and taxation risks and risks of enforcing judgments; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Conflicts of Interest: Conflicts of interest associated with TIAA serving as investment manager of the Account and provider of the liquidity guarantee at the same time as TIAA and its affiliates are serving as an investment manager to other real estate accounts or funds, including conflicts associated with satisfying its fiduciary duties to all such accounts and funds associated with purchasing, selling and leasing of properties; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Required Property Sales: The risk that, if TIAA were to own too large a percentage of the Accounts accumulation units through funding the liquidity guarantee (as determined by the independent fiduciary), the independent fiduciary could require the sales of properties to reduce TIAAs ownership interest, which sales could occur at times and at prices that depress the sale proceeds to the Account; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Government and Government Agency Securities: Risks associated with investment securities issued by U.S. government agencies and U.S. government-sponsored entities, including the risk that the issuer may not have their securities backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, and that transaction activity may fluctuate significantly from time to time, which could negatively impact the value of the securities and the Accounts ability to dispose of a security at a favorable time; and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Liquid Assets and Securities: Risks associated with investments in real estate-related liquid assets (which could include, from time to time, registered or unregistered REIT securities and CMBS), and non-real estate-related liquid assets, including: |
|
Financial/credit riskRisks that the issuer will not be able to pay principal and interest when due or that the issuers earnings will fall; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Market volatility riskRisk that the changing conditions in financial markets may cause the Accounts investments to experience price volatility; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest rate volatility riskRisk that interest rate volatility may affect the Accounts current income from an investment; and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deposit/money market riskRisks that the Account could experience losses if banks fail. |
More detailed discussions of certain of these risk factors are contained in the section of this Form 10-K entitled Item 1A. Risk Factors and in this section below and also in the section entitled Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical experience or managements present expectations.
Caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on managements forward-looking statements, which represent managements views only as of the date that this report is filed. Neither management nor the Account undertake any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, changed assumptions, future events or otherwise.
Commercial real estate market statistics discussed in this section are obtained by the Account from sources that management considers reliable, but some of the data are preliminary for the year or quarter ended December 31, 2015 and may be subsequently revised. Prior period data may have been adjusted to reflect updated calculations. Investors should not rely exclusively on the data presented below in forming a judgment regarding the current or prospective performance of the commercial real estate market generally.
38
2015 U.S. ECONOMIC AND COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE OVERVIEW
The Account invests primarily in high-quality, core real estate in order to meet its investment objective of obtaining favorable long-term returns through rental income and the appreciation of its real estate holdings.
Economic and Capital Markets Overview and Outlook
Recent trends in key U.S. economic indicators and expectations for 2016 and 2017 are summarized in the table below. According to the second estimate from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) grew at a modest 1.0% annual rate in the fourth quarter of 2015 following growth of 2.0% in the third quarter. However, GDP grew at a 2.4% rate for all of 2015, which was the same rate as in 2014. Estimated growth in the fourth quarter was soft but in-line with economists expectations due primarily to weaker consumer spending, a decline in exports, and slower buildup of business inventories. The decline in exports, which reduced GDP growth by 0.34 percentage points, was due in large part to the strength of the dollar which made U.S. goods more expensive in foreign markets. Consumer spending, which accounts for over two-thirds of economic activity, grew at a 2.0% annual rate following growth of 3.0% in the third quarter with weaker spending likely related to warmer than average winter temperatures in much of the country. However, healthy job growth and lower oil and gasoline prices continued to benefit household budgets and could result in stronger spending during 2016. Residential fixed investment remained strong, supported by the ongoing recovery in the housing market. Despite softer overall growth in the fourth quarter, Blue Chip economists expect economic growth to remain healthy in 2016 and 2017.
Economic Indicators*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3Q 2015 |
4Q 2015 |
2015 |
Forecast |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 |
2017 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Economy(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
||||||||||
Employment Growth (Thousands) |
|
|
576 |
|
|
837 |
|
|
2,735 |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
N/A |
||||||||||||||||||||
Unemployment Rate |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
||||||||||
Interest Rates(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 Year Treasury |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
Sources: BEA, BLS, Federal Reserve, Blue Chip Consensus Forecasts, and Moodys Analytics
* |
Data subject to revision |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) |
GDP growth rates are annual rates. Quarterly unemployment rates are the reported value for the final month of the quarter while average annual values represent a twelve-month average. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) |
The Treasury rates are an average over the stated time period. |
Following its December meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) raised interest rates for the first time since effectively setting interest rates at zero percent in December 2008. In raising the target range for the federal funds rate to 1/4 to 1/2 percent, the FOMC noted the considerable improvement in labor market conditions and the expectation that inflation will likely rise closer to its 2.0% objective once the benefits of declining energy prices dissipate. The FOMC also suggested that future increases were likely but that they would occur gradually in order to provide time for businesses and consumers to make necessary adjustments. Materials released following the meeting indicated that three or four 1/4 percent increases could occur in 2016. However, that timetable appears to have changed as financial market volatility increased significantly during January 2016 due to concerns about the implications of slowing growth in China and a plunge in oil prices.
Financial markets were largely stable during the fourth quarter of 2015. The S&P 500 gained 6% while the yield on the 10 Year Treasury increased from 2.2% to 2.3% as the market anticipated and then reacted to the FOMCs move. However, financial markets volatility spiked in January 2016 with the S&P down 9% at one point and the yield on the 10 Year Treasury falling below 2.0%. Oil prices fell below $30 per barrel which heightened investors fears about slowing global growth, the potential impacts on commodity-driven emerging economies, and weaker earnings for U.S. companies with international exposure. Investors in turn fled emerging markets and high yield corporate bonds for safe haven investments like the 10 Year Treasury. The financial markets turmoil has altered expectations about future FOMC interest rate increases, with economists now expecting a single increase in 2016.
39
Despite seemingly solid prospects for the U.S. economy, global recession fears have risen. Concerns are related to the maturity of the current economic cycle, weakness in oil and commodity prices, and the uncertain prospects for the Chinese economy. Growth in the U.S. has also moderated but fundamentals remain sound and the types of imbalances that were present at prior U.S. economic downturns are not currently evident. The current consensus of leading economists surveyed for February 1, 2016 edition of Blue Chip Financial Forecasts is for GDP to grow 2.3% in the first quarter of 2016 and 2.5% in the second quarter. The strength of the dollar will continue to slow manufacturing and production but growth will be sustained by ongoing job gains, healthy consumer spending, modest wage increases, and further housing market improvements.
Risks to the economic forecast and to global growth prospects in general include rising geopolitical tensions, a further decline in oil prices, and turmoil in the foreign exchange markets resulting from the divergent monetary policies of global central banks. Geopolitical risks include escalation of the conflict in Syria and tensions between Saudi Arabia and Iran. Further declines in the price of oil could result in additional payroll and spending cuts from U.S. energy companies both domestically and internationally. Further declines in the price of oil could also undermine the budgets and social programs of oil dependent countries and ultimately lead to unrest. Divergent central bank policies could produce turmoil in foreign exchange markets as Chinas devaluation of the yuan contributed to Januarys financial markets turmoil. The Bank of Japan followed with an unexpected move to lower a key interest rate to negative 0.1% in an attempt to boost economic growth which has lagged for decades. Another round of global monetary easing may be on the horizon, including additional stimulus from the European Central Bank. Further global easing will likely be welcomed by the markets but the moves by global central banks may hamper the FOMCs normalization efforts and lead to further turmoil in the foreign exchange market. Unsettled financial markets conditions, in turn, could constrain hiring and capital spending by U.S. companies. At its January meeting, the FOMC voted not to increase interest rates noting the slowing of the U.S. economy and the recent financial markets volatility: The Committee is closely monitoring global economic and financial developments and is assessing their implications for the labor market and inflation, and for the balance of risks to the outlook.
U.S. economic indicators remain healthy despite the recent financial markets upheaval. Blue Chip economists expect GDP growth of roughly 2.5% throughout 2016 which is reflective of expectations of slower growth in the global economy. Employment is expected to increase by 2.2 million as compared with over 2.5 million in 2015. The expected deceleration in employment growth is largely attributable to the shrinking numbers of available skilled workers as the unemployment rate has fallen to 5.0% as of December 2015. Ongoing employment growth should ultimately result in growth in wages, which coupled with depressed oil and gas prices, should support a healthy level of consumer spending. To date, consumers have saved a disproportionate share of this unexpected gain. Further improvement in home sales and housing construction should also generate ancillary economic benefits from increases in construction employment and spending on home furnishings. GDP and employment growth of this magnitude, in turn, would provide the backdrop for further strength in commercial real estate market conditions.
Real Estate Market Conditions and Outlook
Industry sources such as CB Richard Ellis Econometric Advisors calculate vacancy based on square footage. In keeping with industry standards, the Accounts vacancy data is calculated as a percentage of net rentable space leased, weighted by square footage that is under contractual lease obligation in effect at the end of the period.
Commercial real estate markets and sales activity remained healthy during the fourth quarter of 2015. Data from CB Richard Ellis Econometric Advisors (CBRE-EA) indicate that tenant demand for space remained steady across all property sectors. Construction has increased from the lows of recent years but remains moderate, and real estate market fundamentals improved further in all property sectors during the fourth quarter. Data from Real Capital Analytics indicate that sales of office, industrial, retail, multi-family, and other commercial properties totaled $150 billion in the fourth quarter of 2015 as compared with $109 billion in the third quarter of 2015 and $125 billion in the fourth quarter of 2014. For the year, property sales totaled $509 billion, up 24% compared with 2014.
Green Street Advisors Commercial Property Price Index increased 1.8% during the fourth quarter of 2015 following a 2.1% increase in the third quarter of 2015. For the year, prices increased 10%, matching 2014s gains. However, Green Street Advisors believes that property prices could be lower at the end of 2016. Their
40
base-case scenario of a modest 5% decline in prices is based on signals emanating from the REIT market, where company share prices have fallen below average net asset values, and the corporate bond market, where real estate capitalization rates have fallen slightly below corporate bond yields. There are caveats, notably that the recent spike in corporate bond yields is due primarily to weakness in the energy and commodities sectors and that removing these companies from the corporate bond yield index significantly weakens the implications. While the general market consensus differs markedly from Green Streets expectations, caution is nonetheless warranted.
The NAREIT All Equity REIT index registered a 7.7% gain during the fourth quarter of 2015 following a 1.0% gain in the third quarter. For the year, REITs gained 2.8%. Fourth quarters gains were partly attributable to a rebound in share prices due to weakness in the sector and the overall stock market earlier in the year. REITs were also affected by the market volatility in early 2016, with the NAREIT All Equity REIT index declining 3.5% during January. While REITs have historically exhibited higher return volatility than privately owned commercial real estate, NAREIT All Equity returns have been positive over the most recent three, five, seven and ten year periods. In its February 1, 2016 Real Estate Securities Monthly report, Green Street Advisors concluded that REIT share prices on average were in the low end of its pricey range based on a comparison to the fixed-income market and S&P 500.
Commercial property returns were positive for the 24th consecutive quarter in the fourth quarter of 2015. For the quarter ending December 31, 2015, preliminary NCREIF Fund Index Open-End Diversified Core Equity (NFI-ODCE) Equal Weight returns, net of fees, were 3.21%, compared to the total return in the third quarter 2015 of 3.40%. The NFI-ODCE is a leveraged fund-level return index which includes property investments at ownership share, cash balances, and other investments.
Data for the Accounts top five markets in terms of market value as of December 31, 2015 are provided in the following table. These markets represent 50.2% of the Accounts total real estate portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Top 5 Metro Areas by Fair Value** |
Account % |
Number of |
Metro Area |
Metro Area |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV |
|
|
86.7% |
|
|
14 |
|
|
13.8% |
|
|
10.7% |
||||||||||||||||
New York-Jersey City-White Plains, NY-NJ |
|
|
94.5% |
|
|
12 |
|
|
13.2% |
|
|
10.2% |
||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA |
|
|
79.1% |
|
|
13 |
|
|
10.7% |
|
|
8.3% |
||||||||||||||||
Boston, MA |
|
|
94.4% |
|
|
4 |
|
|
6.3% |
|
|
4.9% |
||||||||||||||||
Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA |
|
|
85.6% |
|
|
6 |
|
|
6.2% |
|
|
4.8% |
* |
Weighted by fair market value, which differs from the calculations provided for market comparisons to CBRE-EA data and are used here to reflect the fair market value of the Accounts monetary investments in those markets. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
** |
Account metro area exposure as determined by the US Office of Management and Budgets 2010 standards for delineating metropolitan areas. Exposure was previously determined based on the 2000 standards. The new standards have had no material impact on the Account exposure in its top metropolitan markets. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*** |
Wholly owned properties are represented at fair value and gross of any debt, while joint venture properties are represented at the net equity value. |
As discussed in detail below, the market value weighted occupancy of properties in the Los Angeles metropolitan area averaged 79.1% due to high vacancy in the Accounts largest office property in that market. However, occupancy increased from 76.8% at the end of the third quarter as re-leasing of available space has begun. Excluding this property, the weighted average occupancy of the Accounts properties in the Los Angeles metropolitan area is 88.1%. The market value weighted occupancy in the Washington, DC metropolitan area is relatively low but improving in large part because of two newly constructed apartment properties that were vacant when acquired but are now completing their initial lease-up.
Office
According to CBRE-EA, the national office vacancy rate declined to 13.2% in the fourth quarter of 2015 as compared to 13.4% in the third quarter of 2015. The national office vacancy rate is now at its lowest level since second quarter 2008. Office fundamentals remained healthy in 2015 due to steady demand and modest construction which resulted in average rent growth of 4% over the year.
In the fourth quarter of 2015, the vacancy rate for the Accounts office portfolio declined to 12.2% from 14.0% in the third quarter of 2015. The decrease in the Accounts office vacancy rate was due to vacancy rate
41
declines in four of its top five markets. In Washington DC, the Accounts top office market, the average vacancy rate of the Accounts properties, which was 12.9% compared to the 15.5% market average, has declined gradually in recent quarters although market leasing activity remains slow as a result of weaker demand from federal government agencies and law firms. The average vacancy of the Accounts properties in Boston declined to 7.0% in the quarter due to recent leasing at one of the Accounts larger properties. There is minimal vacancy in the Accounts San Francisco properties as well as the overall market. The average vacancy rate of the Accounts largest properties in Los Angeles is elevated due in large part to two large tenants moving out of one of the Accounts largest properties earlier in the year. The property is held in a joint venture and Management has known for some time that the moves were planned upon lease expiration and has already been marketing the space to prospective tenants. A sizeable portion of the space has already been leased for the expansion of two existing tenants in the building who will take occupancy in 2016, after tenant improvements are completed. Los Angeless office market fundamentals are healthy, and re-leasing of the remaining space is expected to generate incremental income since current market rents are higher than the existing tenants rent. The average vacancy rate of the Accounts properties in Seattle increased to 13.2% due to a recent acquisition which was 75% leased when acquired. The Account acquired a 90% interest in the newly constructed building, with the remaining space expected to lease quickly given the buildings very desirable location approximately one block from Amazons main campus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Account |
Market Vacancy* |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Top 5 Office Metropolitan Areas |
Total Sector by |
% of Total |
2015 Q4 |
2015 Q3 |
2015 Q4 |
2015 Q3 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Account / Nation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2% |
|
|
14.0% |
|
|
13.2% |
|
|
13.4% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV |
|
|
$1,510.9 |
|
|
6.3% |
|
|
12.9% |
|
|
13.1% |
|
|
15.5% |
|
|
16.1% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boston, MA |
|
|
1,145.0 |
|
|
4.7% |
|
|
7.0% |
|
|
10.9% |
|
|
9.0% |
|
|
10.3% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco, CA |
|
|
1,010.0 |
|
|
4.2% |
|
|
2.4% |
|
|
4.6% |
|
|
6.3% |
|
|
6.5% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA |
|
|
916.1 |
|
|
3.8% |
|
|
37.8% |
|
|
42.2% |
|
|
14.4% |
|
|
14.8% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA |
|
|
914.4 |
|
|
3.8% |
|
|
13.2% |
|
|
9.8% |
|
|
9.9% |
|
|
9.6% |
* |
Source: CBRE-EA. Vacancy is defined as the percentage of space vacant. The Accounts vacancy is defined as the value-weighted percentage of unleased space. |
Historically, the financial services sector has been a significant source of office space demand. While new industry regulations in the wake of the previous recession have slowed companies appetite for new space, demand is picking up as the financial services sector added 39,000 jobs in the fourth quarter of 2015 and 36,000 in the third quarter. Professional and business services have also been a significant source of demand as the sector added 199,000 jobs in the fourth quarter and 121,000 in the third quarter. One exception within the sector has been legal services where employment is growing slowly and firms are economizing on space by reducing per employee space allocations and eliminating conference rooms and libraries, a law industry trend which is likely to persist through 2016. Demand from traditional office users has been supplemented by robust demand from technology, media and entertainment companies in markets such as San Francisco, Seattle, Los Angeles, and New York where rent growth again surpassed the national average in 2015. Houston, on the other hand, had benefited from growth in energy-related industries but recent declines in the price of oil have significantly reduced space demand from the sector, and caused asking rents to decline. On the whole, U.S. office market conditions should remain healthy during 2016 and support moderate rent growth given current employment growth and market conditions in most major metropolitan areas.
Industrial
Industrial market conditions are influenced to a large degree by growth in GDP, industrial production and international trade flows. U.S. industrial market conditions remained healthy in the fourth quarter due to the ongoing growth of the U.S. economy. During the fourth quarter of 2015, the national industrial availability rate fell to 9.4% as compared to 9.6% in the third quarter of 2015. The national industrial availability rate has declined steadily from a peak of 14.5% in mid-2010. The improvement in market conditions came despite
42
a slowdown in exports and manufacturing activity due to the appreciation of the dollar. The decline in exports, however, was offset by an increase in imports which drives warehouse demand at port markets. Industrial production also declined at a 3.4% annual rate in the fourth quarter due in large part to reduced oil and gas drilling and well maintenance. Despite the weakness in selected fundamental indicators, market conditions improved across the country. Nationally, rent growth averaged 3.7% in 2015, with rent growth in port markets like New York, Oakland and Miami above the national average.
The vacancy rate for the Accounts industrial property portfolio declined to an average of 6.5% in the fourth quarter of 2015 compared with 8.1% in the third quarter of 2015. As shown in the table below, the average vacancy rate of the Accounts properties in each of its top five markets remained below their respective market averages. The Accounts overall vacancy rate also declined during the quarter due to increased leasing in larger properties in Chicago and Atlanta. The average vacancy of the Accounts properties in Riverside increased to 6.6% in the quarter due to the acquisition of a pair of recently constructed properties, one of which was vacant when acquired; however, a lease for the entire vacant building has been executed and the tenant will take occupancy after tenant improvements are completed in 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Account |
Market Vacancy* |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Top 5 Industrial Metropolitan Areas |
Total Sector by |
% of Total |
2015 Q4 |
2015 Q3 |
2015 Q4 |
2015 Q3 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Account / Nation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5% |
|
|
8.1% |
|
|
9.4% |
|
|
9.6% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA |
|
|
$870.8 |
|
|
3.6% |
|
|
6.6% |
|
|
2.8% |
|
|
7.3% |
|
|
7.1% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA |
|
|
269.3 |
|
|
1.1% |
|
|
4.2% |
|
|
3.0% |
|
|
4.4% |
|
|
4.5% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tacoma-Lakewood, WA |
|
|
241.5 |
|
|
1.0% |
|
|
1.6% |
|
|
5.3% |
|
|
5.8% |
|
|
6.0% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX |
|
|
239.9 |
|
|
1.0% |
|
|
1.6% |
|
|
2.9% |
|
|
9.7% |
|
|
10.4% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York-Jersey City-White Plains, NY-NJ |
|
|
200.3 |
|
|
0.8% |
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
10.1% |
|
|
10.4% |
* |
Source: CBRE-EA. |
Market availability is the percentage of space available for rent. Account vacancy is the value-weighted percentage of unleased space.
CBRE-EA considers Tacoma part of the Seattle industrial market. Market availability rates reflect the Seattle total.
Multi-Family
Apartment demand is generated from a combination of economic, demographic and socio-economic forces including job growth, household formations, and changes in the U.S. homeownership rate. U.S. apartment markets remained tight despite an increase in construction. The national vacancy rate averaged 4.7% in the fourth quarter of 2015 as compared with 4.3% in the third quarter of 2015. Rent growth averaged 4.6% nationally, with strong growth in metro areas with sizeable technology sectors like San Francisco and San Jose and fast growing metros in the South and Southeast like Dallas, Phoenix, and Fort Lauderdale. Rent growth is expected to moderate in 2016 given anticipated construction as multi-family permits, an indicator of future supply, have risen to their highest level in three decades. However, recent unit demand has been robust, and apartment demand remains healthy due to favorable demographic trends including the growing numbers and strengthening employment growth of 25 to 34 year-olds who are largely renters.
The vacancy rate of the Accounts multi-family portfolio decreased marginally to an average of 8.0% in the fourth quarter of 2015. The Accounts vacancy rate is typically higher than both the national average and metro market averages in large part because Management, like many other large apartment owners, utilizes revenue optimization software to maximize rental income and therefore must maintain a sufficient stock of available units for anticipated demand at peak leasing seasons. The Accounts vacancy rate also reflects ongoing renovation programs at several complexes where units are being held vacant for renovation. The average vacancy rate of the Accounts properties in New York is reflective of a renovation program at one of the properties where smaller units will be combined into larger units that are in greater demand and which
43
command higher rents. In Washington DC, the portfolio vacancy rate declined to 9.2% as two recently acquired projects which were vacant when acquired continue to lease and approach stabilization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Account |
Market Vacancy* |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Top 5 Apartment Metropolitan Areas |
Total Sector by |
% of Total |
2015 Q4 |
2015 Q3 |
2015 Q4 |
2015 Q3 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Account / Nation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0% |
|
|
8.2% |
|
|
4.7% |
|
|
4.3% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York-Jersey City-White Plains, NY-NJ |
|
|
$898.6 |
|
|
3.7% |
|
|
7.3% |
|
|
7.0% |
|
|
3.4% |
|
|
3.0% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV |
|
|
829.2 |
|
|
3.4% |
|
|
9.2% |
|
|
12.0% |
|
|
4.9% |
|
|
4.4% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA |
|
|
525.3 |
|
|
2.2% |
|
|
8.1% |
|
|
8.7% |
|
|
3.8% |
|
|
3.8% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO |
|
|
302.6 |
|
|
1.3% |
|
|
6.8% |
|
|
7.0% |
|
|
5.2% |
|
|
4.2% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, FL |
|
|
297.2 |
|
|
1.2% |
|
|
7.6% |
|
|
8.1% |
|
|
4.1% |
|
|
4.2% |
* |
Source: CBRE-EA. |
Market vacancy is the percentage of units vacant. The Accounts vacancy is the value-weighted percentage of unleased units.
Retail
Retail sales are driven by a variety of economic, demographic and socio-economic factors including job and wage growth, population growth, and household savings rates. Retail sales growth remained modest in the fourth quarter of 2015. Preliminary data from the U.S. Census Bureau showed that retail sales excluding motor vehicles and parts increased 0.7% in the fourth quarter compared with fourth quarter 2014. Similarly, retail markets experienced minimal improvement in the quarter. Availability rates in neighborhood and community centers declined to 11.2% as of the fourth quarter of 2015 compared with 11.3% during the third quarter. The vacancy rate for the Accounts retail portfolio remained low, averaging 5.5% during the fourth quarter as compared with 5.3% in the third quarter. The vacancy rate of the Accounts retail portfolio remained below the national average due to the overall high quality of the retail portfolio as the vacancy rate for the large majority of the Accounts properties is less than 10%. For example, regional malls, which generally have lower vacancy rates nationwide, account for approximately one-third of the Accounts square footage and have an average vacancy rate of 3.2%. With minimal vacancy, Management intends to drive income growth and value in the Accounts retail portfolio by selective renovations, replacing underperforming tenants, and other proactive management intensive activities.
Outlook
Commercial real estate fundamentals showed further improvement during the fourth quarter of 2015 due to ongoing employment growth, modest construction, and low interest rates. Competition for top properties remained intense, but commercial real estate continued to offer attractive returns relative to other asset classes. Market conditions remain strongest in metro areas with sizeable technology, medical and biotechnology sectors. Energy related markets are now grappling with the impacts of a sharp decline in oil prices which has caused oil companies to slash exploration budgets and increase layoffs. Conditions continue to remain weak in metro areas with sizeable U.S. government and defense sectors and are likely to remain so until spending in those sectors recovers. While the regional economic outlook differs, prospects for the U.S. economy as a whole are supportive of further strength in commercial real estate fundamentals. The global economic outlook is less clear, and geopolitical risks remain. Financial markets conditions are also unsettled and prolonged volatility could ultimately affect hiring and spending by U.S. corporations. While recession risks have risen, they remain low, and the U.S. economy appears well positioned for continued growth even if the global economy were to slow. Real estate market conditions should experience further improvement in 2016 provided U.S. economic conditions generally fall in line with economists forecasts.
Consistent with the Accounts investment strategy, the Account completed nine acquisitions in the fourth quarter of 2015. The properties consisted of one apartment building, five office buildings and three industrial
44
buildings, two of which were partial acquisitions. The apartment building is located in a major East Coast market adjacent to an existing Account apartment complex while the industrial building is located in a major West Coast market. The five office buildings include joint venture interests in three life sciences office buildings located in San Francisco and Cambridge, two top medical/life sciences markets. The buildings are occupied by leading life sciences companies such as Biogen and FibroGen, and the Accounts partner is Alexandria Real Estate Equities, the nations premier lab space REIT. The remaining two office buildings are located in San Jose and Seattle, two top West Coast office markets.
There were three dispositions during the fourth quarter of 2015. The first was an industrial building in a non-target market. The second was a partial ownership interest in a Florida shopping center. The third disposition was a joint venture interest in the high rise portion of a Manhattan apartment complex which was sold to a condominium converter, with the Account retaining its 70% interest in the remaining 500 units in the lower floors of the complex. The sale enabled the Account to maintain exposure to a target apartment market and to benefit from incremental prices condominium converters are willing to pay for inventory. Investment activities during the quarter were consistent with the Accounts strategy of investing in high quality properties in target markets and reducing exposure to non-target markets and assets.
Management continued to maintain the Accounts income returns through diligent property management and leasing in combination with expense management. As of the fourth quarter of 2015, the Accounts holdings were 92.2% leased as compared with 91.4% as of the third quarter of 2015. During the fourth quarter of 2015, the Account generated a 1.63% total return. The Accounts real estate assets generated a leveraged 1.81% total return. As shown in the graph below, real estate asset returns for the fourth quarter of 2015 were the twenty-third consecutive quarter of positive income and capital returns.
Management intends to continue to manage the Accounts cash position in a manner that maintains adequate liquidity reserves for new property acquisitions, capital expenditures for existing properties, property and Account operating expenses, the Accounts targeted cash holdings, and the potential redemption of units from participants. Management plans to balance potential property acquisitions with expected financing and disposition activities while maintaining adequate cash reserves, with the ultimate goal of generating incremental Account returns, as well as maintaining the Accounts diversification across property sectors at or close to its current sector weightings. In addition to ongoing investment activities, management will carefully evaluate opportunities to place commercial mortgage debt on select properties and refinance existing debt on assets at lower interest rates in order to further reduce the Accounts overall weighted cost of capital. Management has significantly reduced the Accounts overall weighted cost of capital in recent years and believes that the current interest rate environment can still provide opportunities to further reduce the overall weighted cost of capital and benefit Account returns by taking advantage of low cost, long-term mortgage financing. However, refinancing activities will only be undertaken provided mortgage proceeds can be reinvested in real estate properties or other investments that will benefit overall Account returns.
45
A portion of the Accounts liquid assets is invested in publicly traded REITs, which provides incremental exposure to U.S. commercial real estate, an attractive dividend yield, and a high degree of liquidity. The Accounts $1.0 billion portfolio consists of REIT stocks that closely replicates the NAREIT All Equity REIT index, thereby providing the Account with exposure to a diverse mix of property types and geographic markets. By effectively replicating the index, the Account portfolio avoids the risks associated with concentrated investments in any particular company or sector. The return profile of REITs is currently and has historically been favorable to corporate bonds and government agency debt, albeit with added short term volatility as compared to direct investments in commercial real estate property. The Accounts REIT investments, inclusive of dividends, generated a return of 7.5% during the fourth quarter of 2015, consistent with the 7.7% return in the NAREIT All Equity REIT index during quarter.
Based on the economic and real estate market outlook for 2016, management will maintain its focus on selected property types in target markets with an emphasis on high quality properties in prime urban locations and dense suburban locations where there is limited available land for additional development. These may include properties that have recently completed construction and have not yet begun leasing or are in their initial lease-up phase, and on a limited basis, properties that are ground up development projects in selected markets with limited acquisition opportunities. This investment strategy will provide greater opportunity to gain access to properties in prime locations in major metropolitan areas which have exceptional long term prospects and which management expects will lease at a steady pace given local market conditions. Management is also considering select opportunities to invest internationally and in the U.S. student housing sector. Management will also evaluate additional opportunities to invest in commercial debt including conventional commercial mortgage loans, participating mortgage loans, secured mezzanine loans and commercial mortgage backed securities. Given initial cash-on-cash returns for new acquisitions, management will also evaluate prospective acquisitions based on short- and long-term growth potential, purchase price relative to replacement cost, and portfolio diversification benefits. Emphasis will be given to institutional quality properties with strong occupancy histories and favorable tenant rollover schedules. Management believes that a disciplined investment strategy coupled with further strengthening of the U.S. economy and ongoing strength in U.S. real estate market conditions will position the Account for favorable long-term performance.
Investments as of December 31, 2015
As of December 31, 2015, the Account had total net assets of $22.4 billion, a 12.8% increase from December 31, 2014. The increase in the Accounts net assets was primarily due to net participant inflows into the Account and net appreciation in value of the Accounts investments.
As of December 31, 2015, the Account owned a total of 123 real estate investments, of which 104 were wholly owned and 19 were held in joint ventures. The real estate portfolio included 34 office investments (including eight held in joint ventures), 32 industrial investments (including one held in a joint venture), 35 apartment investments (including one held in a joint venture), 20 retail investments (including eight held in joint ventures), one 75% owned joint venture interest in a portfolio of storage facilities and one leasehold interest encumbered by a ground lease. Of the real estate investments, 27 are subject to debt (including 10 joint venture investments).
The outstanding principal on mortgage loans payable on the Accounts wholly owned real estate portfolio as of December 31, 2015 was $1.8 billion. The Accounts proportionate share of outstanding principal on mortgage loans payable within its joint venture investments was $1.6 billion, which is netted against the underlying properties when determining the joint venture investments fair value presented on the consolidated schedules of investments. When the mortgage loans payable within the joint venture investments are considered, total outstanding principal on the Accounts portfolio as of December 31, 2015 was $3.4 billion, which represented a loan to value ratio of 12.8%. The Account currently has no Account-level debt.
Management believes that the Accounts real estate portfolio is diversified by location and property type. The Accounts largest investment, 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue located in Washington, DC, represented 4.3% of total real estate investments and 3.3% of total investments. As discussed in the Accounts prospectus, the Account does not intend to buy and sell its real estate investments simply to make short-term profits. Rather, the Accounts general strategy in selling real estate investments is to dispose of those assets that management
46
believes (i) have maximized in value, (ii) have underperformed or face deteriorating property-specific or market conditions, (iii) need significant capital infusions in the future, (iv) are appropriate to dispose of in order to remain consistent with the Accounts intent to diversify the Account by property type and geographic location (including reallocating the Accounts exposure to or away from certain property types in certain geographic locations), or (v) otherwise do not satisfy the investment objectives of the Account. Management, from time to time, will evaluate the need to manage liquidity in the Account as part of its analysis as to whether to undertake a particular asset sale. The Account could reinvest any sale proceeds that it does not need to pay operating expenses or to meet debt service or redemption requests (e.g., participant withdrawals or benefit payments).
During 2015, the Account purchased 13 wholly owned real estate investments for $1.2 billion and four joint venture investments for $679.6 million as displayed in the following table.
Property Investments Acquired in 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
(In millions) |
|||||||||||||
Property Name |
Property Type |
City |
State |
Net |
|||||||||
Wholly Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
837 Washington Street |
Office |
New York |
NY |
|
|
$ |
|
190.8 |
|||||
Casa Palma |
Apartments |
Coconut Creek |
FL |
|
|
90.0 |
|||||||
250 North 10th Street |
Apartments |
Brooklyn |
NY |
|
|
169.7 |
|||||||
200 Milik Street |
Industrial |
Carteret |
NJ |
|
|
49.8 |
|||||||
Beltway North Commerce Center |
Industrial |
Houston |
TX |
|
|
23.4 |
|||||||
UnionSouth Lake Union |
Apartments |
Seattle |
WA |
|
|
112.6 |
|||||||
The Cordelia |
Apartments |
Portland |
OR |
|
|
47.9 |
|||||||
The Manor at Flagler Village |
Apartments |
Fort Lauderdale |
FL |
|
|
149.0 |
|||||||
Pinto Business Park |
Industrial |
Houston |
TX |
|
|
93.2 |
|||||||
Oakmont IE West Portfolio |
Industrial |
Fontana |
CA |
|
|
73.1 |
|||||||
The Ashton |
Apartments |
Washington |
DC |
|
|
41.8 |
|||||||
Stevenson Point |
Industrial |
Newark |
CA |
|
|
41.5 |
|||||||
Castro Station |
Office |
Mountain View |
CA |
|
|
148.9 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Total Wholly Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
1,231.7 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Joint Ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
400 Fairview(1) |
Office |
Seattle |
WA |
|
|
$ |
|
225.4 |
|||||
1500 Owens Street(2) |
Office |
San Francisco |
CA |
|
|
73.7 |
|||||||
225 Binney Street(3) |
Office |
Cambridge |
MA |
|
|
190.5 |
|||||||
409-499 Illinois Street(4) |
Office |
San Francisco |
CA |
|
|
190.0 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Total Joint Ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
679.6 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
1,911.3 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The Account acquired a 90% ownership interest in the joint venture. Net acquisition cost represents the Accounts share. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) |
The Account acquired a 49.9% ownership interest in the joint venture. Net acquisition cost represents the Accounts share. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) |
The Account acquired a 70% ownership interest in the joint venture. Net acquisition cost represents the Accounts share. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) |
The Account acquired a 40% ownership interest in the joint venture. Net acquisition cost represents the Accounts share. |
47
During 2015, the Account sold two wholly owned real estate investments for a net sales price of $443.0 million and five assets held within three joint venture investments for a net sales price of $204.8 million, realizing a gain of $213.6 million.
Property Investments Sold in 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
(In millions) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Property Name |
Property |
City |
State |
Net |
Mortgage |
|||||||||||||||
Wholly Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
50 Fremont |
Office |
San Francisco |
CA |
|
|
$ |
|
621.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
(200.0 |
)(4) |
||||||
Summit Distribution Center |
Industrial |
Memphis |
TN |
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Wholly Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
643.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
(200.0 |
) |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Joint Ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
East Lake Woodlands(1) |
Retail |
Palm Harbor |
FL |
|
|
$ |
|
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|||||||
International Drive(1) |
Retail |
Orlando |
FL |
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Alafaya Square(1) |
Retail |
Oviedo |
FL |
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Hillsboro Square(2) |
Retail |
Deerfield Beach |
FL |
|
|
37.6 |
|
|
(16.0 |
) |
|
|||||||||
MiMA Tower(3) |
Apartments |
New York |
NY |
|
|
175.7 |
|
|
(42.8 |
) |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Joint Ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
263.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
(58.8 |
) |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
906.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
(258.8 |
) |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Properties held within the Florida Retail Portfolio investment (80% Account interest). The net sales price and mortgage loan payoff represents the Accounts share. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) |
Property held within the DDR Joint Venture Investment (85% Account interest). The net sales price and mortgage loan payoff represents the Accounts share. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) |
Property held within the MiMA joint venture investment (70% Account interest). The net sales price and mortgage loan payoff represents the Accounts share. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) |
The mortgage was extinguished when assumed by the buyer. |
The following charts reflect the diversification of the Accounts real estate assets by region and property type and list its ten largest investments. All information is based on the fair values of the investments at December 31, 2015.
Diversification by Fair Value(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
East |
West |
South |
Midwest |
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office |
|
|
20.8 |
% |
|
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
44.5 |
% |
|
||||||||||
Apartment |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
23.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Retail |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
15.1 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
14.3 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Other(2) |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
3.1 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
|
|
38.7 |
% |
|
|
|
37.6 |
% |
|
|
|
22.2 |
% |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Wholly owned properties are represented at fair value and gross of any debt, while joint venture properties are represented at the net equity value. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) |
Represents interest in Storage Portfolio investment and a fee interest encumbered by a ground lease real estate investment. |
Properties in the East region are located in: CT, DC, DE, KY, MA, MD, ME, NC, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, SC, VA, VT, WV
Properties in the West region are located in: AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA, WY
Properties in the South region are located in: AL, AR, FL, GA, LA, MS, OK, TN, TX
Properties in the Midwest region are located in: IA, IL, IN, KS, MI, MN, MO, ND, NE, OH, SD, WI
48
Top Ten Largest Real Estate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Property Investment Name |
City |
State |
Type |
Fair Value |
Property as |
Property as |
|||||||||||||||||||||
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue |
Washington |
DC |
Office |
|
|
$ |
|
805.8 |
(2) |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|||||||
The Florida Mall |
Orlando |
FL |
Retail |
|
|
644.5 |
(3) |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
2.7 |
|||||||||||||
Colorado Center |
Santa Monica |
CA |
Office |
|
|
559.3 |
(4) |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
2.3 |
|||||||||||||
99 High Street |
Boston |
MA |
Office |
|
|
506.4 |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
2.1 |
|||||||||||||||
Fourth and Madison |
Seattle |
WA |
Office |
|
|
489.3 |
(5) |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
2.0 |
|||||||||||||
DDR Joint Venture |
Various |
USA |
Retail |
|
|
488.8 |
(6) |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
2.0 |
|||||||||||||
425 Park Avenue |
New York |
NY |
Ground Lease |
|
|
440.0 |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
1.8 |
|||||||||||||||
501 Boylston Street |
Boston |
MA |
Office |
|
|
434.3 |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
1.8 |
|||||||||||||||
Ontario Industrial Portfolio |
Ontario |
CA |
Industrial |
|
|
421.6 |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
1.7 |
|||||||||||||||
780 Third Avenue |
New York |
NY |
Office |
|
|
420.6 |
(7) |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
1.7 |
(1) |
Fair Value as reported in the December 31, 2015 Consolidated Schedule of Investments. Wholly owned properties are represented at fair value and gross of any debt, while joint venture investments are represented at the net equity value. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) |
This property is presented gross of debt. The value of the property less the fair value of leverage is $473.0 million. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) |
This property is held in a joint venture with Simon Property Group, L.P., in which the Account holds a 50% interest, and is presented net of debt. As of December 31, 2015, this debt had a fair value of $186.0 million. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) |
This property is held in a joint venture with EOP Operating LP, in which the Account holds a 50% interest. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(5) |
This property is presented gross of debt. The value of the property less the fair value of leverage is $289.4 million. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(6) |
This investment is held in a joint venture with DDR Corp., in which the Account holds an 85% interest, and consists of 25 retail properties located in 11 states and is presented net of debt. As of December 31, 2015, this debt had a fair value of $678.1 million. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(7) |
This property is presented gross of debt. The value of the property less the fair value of leverage is $252.4 million. |
As of December 31, 2015, the Account held 77.4% of its total investments in real estate and real estate joint ventures. The Account also held investments in government agency notes representing 11.0% of total investments, real estate-related equity securities representing 4.2% of total investments, U.S. Treasury securities representing 6.4% of total investments, real estate limited partnerships representing 0.6% of total investments and a loan receivable representing 0.4% of total investments.
49
Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2014
Performance
The Accounts total return was 8.16% for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to 12.22% for the year ended 2014. The Accounts annualized total returns over the past one, three, five, and ten year periods ended December 31, 2015 were 8.16%, 10.00%, 10.60%, and 4.22%, respectively. As of December 31, 2015, the Accounts annualized total return since inception was 6.51%.
Net Investment Income
The table below shows the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the dollar and percentage changes for those periods (dollars in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Years Ended |
Change |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
$ |
% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Rental income |
|
|
$ |
|
919.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
897.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
21.3 |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
||||||||
Real estate property level expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
|
|
207.4 |
|
|
208.0 |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
-0.3 |
% |
|
||||||||||||
Real estate taxes |
|
|
144.4 |
|
|
134.1 |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
|
|
81.1 |
|
|
98.7 |
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
|
|
|
-17.8 |
% |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total real estate property level expenses |
|
|
432.9 |
|
|
440.8 |
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
|
-1.8 |
% |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate income, net |
|
|
486.2 |
|
|
457.0 |
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
Income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships |
|
|
140.1 |
|
|
148.1 |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
|
-5.4 |
% |
|
||||||||||||
Interest |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
N/M |
||||||||||||||||
Dividends |
|
|
47.5 |
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENT INCOME |
|
|
683.9 |
|
|
652.8 |
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Investment advisory charges |
|
|
69.3 |
|
|
70.7 |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
-2.0 |
% |
|
||||||||||||
Administrative charges |
|
|
56.9 |
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
26.7 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
Distribution charges |
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
38.2 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
Mortality and expense risk charges |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
22.2 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
Liquidity guarantee charges |
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL EXPENSES |
|
|
182.9 |
|
|
163.0 |
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT INCOME, NET |
|
|
$ |
|
501.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
489.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
11.2 |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/MNot meaningful
Rental Income:
Rental income increased $21.3 million, or 2.4%, as a result of higher occupancy and rental rates primarily in the industrial, apartment and office sectors.
Operating Expenses:
Operating expenses decreased $0.6 million, or 0.3%, primarily related to net dispositions of real estate investments, offset by increases in repair and maintenance expense and leasing expenses in the apartment sector, due to increased occupancy.
50
Real Estate Taxes:
Real estate taxes increased $10.3 million, or 7.7%, due to higher property tax assessments resulting from increases in values across the real estate portfolio, particularly in the Eastern retail sector, as well as office and industrial sectors throughout various regions. Additional increases were associated with the net acquisitions of real estate investments.
Interest Expense:
Interest expense decreased $17.6 million, or 17.8%, primarily due to the payoff of mortgage loans, as well as the refinance of an existing mortgage loan, reducing the overall average interest rate of the Accounts mortgage loans payable.
Income from Real Estate Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships:
Income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships decreased $8.0 million, or 5.4%, due to several dispositions during the year, partially offset by increased rents at Miami International Mall and the Storage Portfolio.
Interest and Dividend Income:
Interest income increased as a result of Accounts investment in a loan receivable, while dividend income increased proportionately with the Accounts increased holdings of marketable securities.
Expenses:
The Account’s expenses increased $19.9 million or 12.2%. Investment advisory, administrative and distribution charges are costs charged to the Account associated with managing the Account. Investment advisory charges are comprised primarily of fixed components, whereas administrative and distribution charges are comprised of more variable components that generally correspond with movements in net assets. Approximately half of the increases in administrative and distribution expenses were attributed to the increase in net assets. Other factors, such as higher allocated expenses related to the complexity of administering and distributing the Account, contributed to the remainder of the increase. Investment advisory, administrative and distribution charges were, collectively, 0.71% and 0.73% of average net assets during 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Mortality and expense risk and liquidity guarantee charges are contractual charges to the Account from TIAA for TIAA’s assumption of these risks and provision of the guarantee. The rate for these charges generally is established annually; the current rate is effective April 24, 2015 through April 30, 2016, and is charged based on the Account’s net assets.
51
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses on Investments and Mortgage Loans Payable
The table below shows the net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments and mortgage loans payable for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the dollar and percentage changes for those periods (dollars in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Years Ended |
Change |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
$ |
% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS AND MORTGAGE LOANS PAYABLE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate properties |
|
|
$ |
|
215.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
69.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
146.4 |
|
|
N/M |
||||||||||
Real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships |
|
|
167.3 |
|
|
(34.7 |
) |
|
|
|
202.0 |
|
|
N/M |
||||||||||||||
Marketable securities |
|
|
235.8 |
|
|
65.4 |
|
|
170.4 |
|
|
N/M |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total realized gain on investments: |
|
|
618.5 |
|
|
99.7 |
|
|
518.8 |
|
|
N/M |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate properties |
|
|
487.2 |
|
|
918.8 |
|
|
(431.6 |
) |
|
|
|
-47.0 |
% |
|
||||||||||||
Real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships |
|
|
288.6 |
|
|
372.0 |
|
|
(83.4 |
) |
|
|
|
-22.4 |
% |
|
||||||||||||
Marketable securities |
|
|
(255.1 |
) |
|
|
|
302.8 |
|
|
(557.9 |
) |
|
|
|
N/M |
||||||||||||
Loan receivable |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
N/M |
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans payable |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
(64.9 |
) |
|
|
|
70.5 |
|
|
N/M |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments and mortgage loans payable |
|
|
526.9 |
|
|
1,528.7 |
|
|
(1,001.8 |
) |
|
|
|
-65.5 |
% |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN ON INVESTMENTS AND MORTGAGE LOANS PAYABLE |
|
|
$ |
|
1,145.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
1,628.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
(483.0 |
) |
|
|
|
-29.7 |
% |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/MNot meaningful
Real Estate Properties, Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships:
Net realized gains in the Account are primarily due to the sale of wholly owned real estate property investments and real estate property investments underlying the Accounts joint venture investments. See the Recent Transactions section herein for additional disclosure regarding the sale of the Accounts real estate property investments.
Real Estate Properties:
The Accounts wholly owned real estate investments experienced net realized and unrealized gains of $702.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to $987.8 million of net realized and unrealized gains for 2014. The resulting $285.2 million decrease, when compared to the prior year, was primarily driven by market stabilizations across the sectors.
Real Estate Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships:
The Accounts real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships experienced net realized and unrealized gains of $455.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to net realized and unrealized gains of $337.3 million for 2014. The resulting $118.6 million net increase, when compared to the previous year, was driven by an increase in valuation, most notably in the office and retail sectors.
Marketable Securities:
The Accounts marketable securities positions experienced net realized and unrealized losses of $19.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to net realized and unrealized gains of $368.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. During 2015, the markets for REITs decreased in the U.S. as measured by the FTSE NAREIT All Equity REITs Index; the Accounts real estate related equity securities align with these market movements.
52
Additionally, the Account had $4.2 billion invested in government agency notes and U.S. Treasury Securities at December 31, 2015, which had nominal changes due to the short term nature of these investments.
Mortgage Loans Payable:
Mortgage loans payable experienced unrealized gains of $5.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to unrealized losses of $64.9 million for 2014. The increase in unrealized gains as compared to the previous year can be attributed to a reduction in US Treasury rates, offset by higher mortgage yields.
Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2013
Performance
The Accounts total return was 12.22% for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to 9.65% for the year ended 2013. The Accounts annualized total returns over the past one, three, five, and ten year periods ended December 31, 2014 were 12.22%, 10.64%, 11.63%, and 4.77%, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, the Accounts annualized total return since inception was 6.42%.
Net Investment Income
The table below shows the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 and the dollar and percentage changes for those periods (dollars in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Years Ended |
Change |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
$ |
% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Rental income |
|
|
$ |
|
897.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
831.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
66.3 |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
||||||||
Real estate property level expenses and taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
|
|
208.0 |
|
|
202.4 |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
Real estate taxes |
|
|
134.1 |
|
|
121.3 |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
|
|
98.7 |
|
|
116.8 |
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
|
-15.5 |
% |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total real estate property level expenses and taxes. |
|
|
440.8 |
|
|
440.5 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate income, net |
|
|
457.0 |
|
|
391.0 |
|
|
66.0 |
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
Income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships |
|
|
148.1 |
|
|
104.7 |
|
|
43.4 |
|
|
41.5 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
Interest |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
-3.4 |
% |
|
||||||||||||
Dividends |
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENT INCOME |
|
|
652.8 |
|
|
540.8 |
|
|
112.0 |
|
|
20.7 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Investment advisory charges |
|
|
70.7 |
|
|
59.3 |
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
Administrative charges |
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
41.7 |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
Distribution charges |
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
35.2 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
Mortality and expense risk charges |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
Liquidity guarantee charges |
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
30.5 |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
-4.3 |
% |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL EXPENSES |
|
|
163.0 |
|
|
145.1 |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
12.3 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT INCOME, NET |
|
|
$ |
|
489.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
395.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
94.1 |
|
|
23.8 |
% |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental Income:
Rental income increased $66.3 million, or 8.0%, due in part to a $20.4 million increase in the office sector driven by higher occupancy and rental rates in the San Francisco, Miami, and Washington, DC markets. The remaining sectors drove a $16.6 million increase as a result of increases in occupancy and rental rates. Additional increases were associated with the net acquisitions of real estate investments.
53
Operating Expenses:
Operating expenses increased $5.6 million, or 2.8%, primarily related to net acquisitions of real estate investments with marginal increases at existing real estate investments.
Real Estate Taxes:
Real estate taxes increased $12.8 million, or 10.6%, primarily due to higher property tax assessments resulting from increases in value across the real estate portfolio. Additional increases were associated with the net acquisitions of real estate investments.
Interest Expense:
Interest expense decreased $18.1 million, or 15.5%, primarily due to the payoff of mortgage loans associated with sold and existing real estate investments as well as the refinance of existing mortgage loans, reducing the overall average interest rate of the Accounts mortgage loans payable.
Income from Real Estate Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships:
Income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships increased $43.4 million, or 41.5%, due to increased cash distributions driven by earnings primarily from the Accounts joint venture investments. The largest distributions were from the Accounts DDR, Four Oaks, Florida and Miami International Mall joint ventures.
Interest and Dividend Income:
Interest and dividend income remained relatively consistent as a ratio of marketable securities held during 2014 compared to 2013.
Expenses:
The Accounts expenses increased $17.9 million, or 12.3%. Investment advisory, administrative and distribution charges are costs charged to the Account associated with managing the Account. These costs have fixed and variable components, the latter of which generally correspond to the level of the Accounts net assets under management. Investment advisory, administrative and distribution charges were, collectively, 0.73% and 0.72% of average net assets during 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Mortality and expense risk and liquidity guarantee charges are contractual charges to the Account from TIAA for TIAAs assumption of these risks and provision of the guarantee. The rate for these charges generally is established annually effective May 1 for each twelve month period ending each April 30 and is charged based on the Accounts net assets. While net assets increased during 2014 compared to 2013, liquidity guarantee charges decreased as a result of the change in deduction rates effective May 1, 2014.
54
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses on Investments and Mortgage Loans Payable
The following table shows the net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments and mortgage loans payable for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 and the dollar and percentage changes for those periods (dollars in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Years Ended |
Change |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
$ |
% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS AND MORTGAGE LOANS PAYABLE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate properties |
|
|
$ |
|
69.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
(210.0 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
|
279.0 |
|
|
N/M |
||||||||
Real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships |
|
|
(34.7 |
) |
|
|
|
(153.0 |
) |
|
|
|
118.3 |
|
|
77.3 |
% |
|
||||||||||
Marketable securities |
|
|
65.4 |
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
33.8 |
|
|
N/M |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total realized gain (loss) on investments: |
|
|
99.7 |
|
|
(331.4 |
) |
|
|
|
431.1 |
|
|
N/M |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate properties |
|
|
918.8 |
|
|
863.1 |
|
|
55.7 |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
Real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships |
|
|
372.0 |
|
|
479.0 |
|
|
(107.0 |
) |
|
|
|
-22.3 |
% |
|
||||||||||||
Marketable securities |
|
|
302.8 |
|
|
(41.7 |
) |
|
|
|
344.5 |
|
|
N/M |
||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans payable |
|
|
(64.9 |
) |
|
|
|
91.2 |
|
|
(156.1 |
) |
|
|
|
N/M |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments and mortgage loans payable |
|
|
1,528.7 |
|
|
1,391.6 |
|
|
137.1 |
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN ON INVESTMENTS AND MORTGAGE LOANS PAYABLE |
|
|
$ |
|
1,628.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
1,060.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
568.2 |
|
|
53.6 |
% |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/MNot meaningful
Real Estate Properties, Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships:
Net realized losses in the Account are primarily due to the sale of wholly owned real estate property investments and real estate property investments underlying the Accounts joint venture investments.
Real Estate Properties:
The Accounts wholly owned real estate investments experienced net realized and unrealized gains of $987.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to $653.1 million of net realized and unrealized gains for 2013. The resulting $334.7 million net increase was primarily driven by continued compression of capitalization rates, improved occupancy, increased market rents, and several newly acquired real estate property investments. The largest increases were in the office and industrial sectors, most notably in the Western region. Included within the net unrealized gains of the Account were foreign exchange losses of $38.9 million and $4.8 million during 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Real Estate Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships:
The Accounts real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships experienced net realized and unrealized gains of $337.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to net realized and unrealized gains of $326.0 million for 2013. The resulting $11.3 million net increase was driven by an increase in valuation, most notably in the office sector, partially offset by a higher distribution of earnings as previously discussed in Income from Real Estate Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships.
Marketable Securities:
The Accounts marketable securities positions experienced net realized and unrealized gains of $368.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to net realized and unrealized losses of $10.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. During 2014, the markets for REITs increased in the U.S. as measured by the
55
FTSE NAREIT All Equity REITs Index; the Accounts real estate related equity securities appreciated in line with these market movements.
Additionally, the Account held $3.8 billion invested in government agency notes and U.S. Treasury Securities, which had nominal changes due to the short term nature of these investments.
Mortgage Loans Payable:
Mortgage loans payable experienced unrealized losses of $64.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to unrealized gains of $91.2 million for 2013. Valuation adjustments to mortgage loans payable are highly dependent upon interest rates, investment return demands, and the performance of the underlying real estate investment. Overall, the Accounts mortgage loans have increased in value primarily as a result of reductions in U.S. Treasury rates.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Accounts cash and cash equivalents and non-real estate-related marketable securities had a value of $4.2 billion and $3.9 billion, respectively (18.9% and 19.5% of the Accounts net assets at such dates, respectively).
Participant Flows: Year Ended December 31, 2015 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2014
During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Account received $2.9 billion in premiums from participants offset by participant outflows of $2.0 billion in annuity payments and withdrawals and death benefits. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Account received $2.4 billion in premiums from participants offset by participant outflows of $1.6 billion in annuity payments, withdrawals and death benefits.
Liquidity Guarantee
Primarily as a result of significant net participant transfers out of the Account during late 2008 and mid-2009, pursuant to TIAAs existing liquidity guarantee obligation, the TIAA General Account purchased $1.2 billion of liquidity units issued by the Account in a number of separate transactions between December 2008 and June 2009. Subsequent to June 2009, the TIAA General Account did not purchase any additional liquidity units. As disclosed under Establishing and Managing the Accountthe Role of TIAALiquidity Guarantee, in the Accounts prospectus, in accordance with this liquidity guarantee obligation, TIAA guarantees that all participants in the Account may redeem their accumulation units at their accumulation unit value next determined after their transfer or cash withdrawal request is received in good order. The Account pays TIAA for the risk associated with providing the liquidity guarantee through a daily deduction from the Accounts net assets.
Net participant transfers out of the Account significantly slowed following the first quarter of 2009, and net participant transfer activity turned to net inflows in early 2010, which has continued through the date of this report. As a result, while management cannot predict whether any future TIAA liquidity unit purchases will be required under this liquidity guarantee, it is unlikely that additional purchases will be required in the near term. However, management cannot predict for how long net inflows will continue to occur. If net outflows were to occur (even if not at the same intensity as in 2008 and early 2009), it could have a negative impact on the Accounts operations and returns and could require TIAA to purchase additional liquidity units, perhaps to a significant degree, as was the case in late 2008 and early 2009.
TIAAs obligation to provide Account participants liquidity through purchases of liquidity units is not subject to an express regulatory or contractual limitation, although as described in the following paragraph, the independent fiduciary may (but is not obligated to) require the reduction of TIAAs interest through sales of assets from the Account if TIAAs interest exceeds the trigger point. Even if the independent fiduciary so requires TIAAs obligation to provide liquidity under the guarantee, which is required by the New York State Department of Financial Services, will continue. Management believes that TIAA has the ability to meet its obligations under this liquidity guarantee.
56
Whenever TIAA owns liquidity units, the duties of the Accounts independent fiduciary, as part of its monitoring of the Account, include reviewing the purchase and redemption of liquidity units by TIAA to ensure the Account uses the correct accumulation unit values. In addition, the independent fiduciarys responsibilities include:
|
establishing the percentage of total accumulation units that TIAAs ownership should not exceed (the trigger point) and creating a method for reviewing the trigger point; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
approving any adjustment of TIAAs ownership interest in the Account and, in its discretion, requiring an adjustment if TIAAs ownership of liquidity units reaches the trigger point; and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
once the trigger point has been reached, participating in any program to reduce TIAAs ownership in the Account by utilizing cash flow or liquid investments in the Account, or by utilizing the proceeds from asset sales. If the independent fiduciary were to determine that TIAAs ownership should be reduced following the trigger point, its role in participating in any asset sales program would include (i) participating in the selection of properties for sale, (ii) providing sales guidelines and (iii) approving those sales if, in the independent fiduciarys opinion, such sales are desirable to reduce TIAAs ownership of liquidity units. |
In establishing the appropriate trigger point, including whether or not to require certain actions once the trigger point has been reached, the independent fiduciary will assess, among other things and to the extent consistent with the Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE 96-76) issued by the U.S. Department of Labor in 1996 with respect to the liquidity guarantee and the independent fiduciarys duties under ERISA, the risk that a conflict of interest could arise due to the level of TIAAs ownership interest in the Account.
Redemption of Liquidity Units. The independent fiduciary is vested with oversight and approval over any redemption of TIAAs liquidity units, acting in the best interests of Real Estate Account participants.
As of March 31, 2013, the independent fiduciary completed the systematic redemption of all of the liquidity units held by the TIAA General Account. Approximately one-quarter of such units were redeemed evenly over the business days in each of the months of June, September, and December 2012, and March 2013, representing a total of $1.3 billion redeemed during this period.
As a general matter, the independent fiduciary may authorize or direct the redemption of all or a portion of liquidity units at any time and TIAA will request the approval of the independent fiduciary before any liquidity units are redeemed. Upon termination and liquidation of the Account (wind-up), any liquidity units held by TIAA will be the last units redeemed, unless the independent fiduciary directs otherwise.
Net Income and Marketable Securities
The Accounts net investment income continues to be an additional source of liquidity for the Account. Net investment income was $501.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to $489.8 million during 2014. Total net investment income increased as described more fully in the Results of Operations section.
As of December 31, 2015, cash and cash equivalents, along with real estate-related and non-real estate-related marketable securities comprised 23.5% of the Accounts net assets. The Accounts real estate-related marketable securities primarily consist of publicly traded REITs. The Accounts liquid assets continue to be available to purchase suitable real estate properties, meet the Accounts debt obligations, expense needs, and participant redemption requests (i.e., participant withdrawals or benefit payments).
Leverage
The Account may borrow money and assume or obtain a mortgage on a property to make leveraged real estate investments. Also, to meet any short-term cash needs, the Account may obtain a line of credit that may be unsecured and/or contain terms that may require the Account to secure the loan with one or more of its properties.
57
The Account is authorized to borrow money in accordance with its investment guidelines. Under the Accounts current investment guidelines, the Accounts loan to value ratio (as described below) is to be maintained at or below 30%. Such incurrences of debt from time to time may include:
|
placing new debt on properties; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
refinancing outstanding debt; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
assuming debt on acquired properties or interests in the Accounts properties; and/or |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
extending the maturity date of outstanding debt. |
In calculating this limit, only the Accounts actual percentage interest in any borrowings is included, and not that percentage interest held by any joint venture partner. Further, the Account may only borrow up to 70% of the then-current value of a property, although construction loans may be for 100% of the costs incurred in developing a property. As of December 31, 2015, one construction loan was held within the Accounts joint venture investment Four Oaks Place, L.P. At the time the Account (or a joint venture in which the Account is a partner) enters into a revolving line of credit, for the purpose of calculating the loan to value ratio, management deems the maximum amount which may be drawn under that line of credit as fully incurred, regardless of whether the maximum amount available has been drawn from time to time.
As of December 31, 2015, the Accounts ratio of outstanding principal amount of debt (inclusive of the Accounts proportionate share of debt held within its joint venture investments) to total gross asset value (i.e., a loan to value ratio) was 12.8%. The Account intends to maintain its loan to value ratio at or below 30% (this ratio is measured at the time of incurrence and after giving effect thereto). The Accounts total gross asset value, for these purposes, is equal to the total fair value of the Accounts assets (including the fair value of the Accounts net equity interest in joint ventures), with no reduction associated with any indebtedness on such assets.
As of December 31, 2015, $34.7 million in principal amount of mortgage obligations secured by real estate investments wholly owned by the Account are obligated to be paid throughout 2016. The Account currently has sufficient liquidity in the form of cash and cash equivalents and short term securities to meet its current mortgage obligations.
In times of high net inflow activity, in particular during times of high net participant transfer inflows, management may determine to apply a portion of such cash flows to make prepayments of indebtedness prior to scheduled maturity, which would have the effect of reducing the Accounts loan to value ratio.
Recent Transactions
The following describes property transactions by the Account during the fourth quarter of 2015. Except as noted, the expenses for operating the properties purchased are either borne or reimbursed, in whole or in part, by the property tenants, although the terms vary under each lease.
Purchases
Oakmont IE West Portfolio: Santa AnaFontana, CA
On October 6, 2015, the Account purchased a newly constructed 311,470 square foot industrial property located in Fontana, California for $30.2 million. The property was vacant at the time of purchase.
The AshtonWashington, DC
On November 4, 2015, the Account purchased a 79,933 square foot, twelve-story, multi-family property located in Washington, DC for $41.8 million. The property was 100% leased at the time of purchase.
Stevenson PointNewark, CA
On November 12, 2015, the Account purchased a five-building, 312,885 square foot industrial property located in Newark, California for $41.5 million. The property was 100% leased at the time of purchase.
58
Castro StationMountain View, CA
On November 20, 2015, the Account purchased a 114,809 square foot office property, consisting of two two-story buildings and one three-story building, located in Mountain View, California, for $148.9 million. The property was 100% leased at the time of purchase.
400 FairviewSeattle, WA
On December 9, 2015, the Account purchased a 90% interest in a joint venture investment, which holds a 349,152 square foot office property located in Seattle, Washington, for $225.4 million (the Accounts share). At the time of purchase, the property was 75.5% leased.
1500 Owens StreetSan Francisco, CA
On December 15, 2015, the Account purchased a 49.9% interest in a joint venture investment, which holds a 158,267 square foot office property located in San Francisco, California, for $73.7 million (the Accounts share). The property was 100% leased at the time of purchase.
225 Binney StreetCambridge, MA
On December 16, 2015, the Account purchased a 70% interest in a joint venture investment, which holds an office property located in Cambridge, Massachusetts, for $190.5 million (the Accounts share). The six-story, 305,212 square foot property was 100% leased at the time of purchase.
409-499 IllinoisSan Francisco, CA
On December 17, 2015, the Account purchased a 40% interest in a joint venture investment, which holds an office property located in San Francisco, California, for $190.0 million (the Accounts share). The 456,181 square foot, two building property was 100% leased at the time of purchase.
Pinto Business Park: Alfa LavalHouston, TX
On December 22, 2015, the Account purchased a 103,000 square foot, newly constructed industrial property located in Houston, Texas for $20.7 million. This portion of the property was 100% pre-leased at the time of purchase.
Sales
Summit Distribution CenterMemphis, TN
On October 22, 2015, the Account sold an industrial property located in Memphis, Tennessee for a net sales price of $21.6 million, resulting in a realized loss from the sale of $1.6 million, the majority of which had been previously recognized as unrealized losses in the Accounts consolidated statements of operations. The Accounts cost basis in the property at the date of sale was $23.2 million.
DDR Joint Venture: Hillsboro SquareDeerfield Beach, FL
On December 10, 2015, the Accounts DDR joint venture investment, in which the Account holds an 85% interest, sold a retail property located in Deerfield Beach, Florida for a net sales price of $37.6 million (the Accounts share). The Account realized a gain of $6.6 million from the sale, the majority of which was previously recognized as unrealized gains in the Accounts consolidated statements of operations. The Accounts cost basis in the property at the date of sale was $31.0 million. Debt associated with the property was extinguished concurrent with the sale of the property, as discussed in the Financings section.
Cobalt Industrial REIT
On December 31, 2015, Cobalt Industrial REIT, in which the Account held a 10.998% interest, was legally dissolved.
59
Heitman Value Partners Fund
On December 15, 2015, Heitman Value Partners Fund, in which the Account held an 8.43% interest, was legally dissolved.
MiMA: TowerNew York, NY
On December 21, 2015, the Accounts RGM 42, LLC joint venture investment, in which the Account holds a 70% interest, sold its interest in One MiMA Tower, located in New York, New York, for a net sales price of $175.7 million (the Accounts interest). The Account realized a gain of $8.6 million from the sale, the majority of which had been recognized as unrealized gains in the Accounts consolidated statements of operations. The Accounts cost basis in the property at the date of sale was $167.1 million. Debt associated with the property was extinguished concurrent with the sale of the property, as discussed in the Financings section.
Financings
Publix at Weston CommonsWeston, FL
On October 1, 2015, the Account paid off a $35.0 million mortgage associated with the property.
401 West 14th StreetNew York, NY
On October 28, 2015, the Accounts 401 West 14th Street, LLC joint venture investment, in which the Account holds an 42.2% interest, paid off its outstanding $36.5 million mortgage loan (the Accounts share) and entered into a new $37.5 million mortgage loan (the Accounts share) with a 4.03% fixed interest rate, maturing in November 2030.
DDR Joint VentureVarious, USA
On December 10, 2015, the Accounts DDR joint venture investment, in which the Account holds an 85% interest, paid $18.4 million dollars (the Accounts share) to release the Hillsboro Square asset from its inclusion as collateral in the DDR Debt Pool 5 in connection with its sale. Of the $18.4 million, $16.0 million was applied to fully extinguish the debt amount secured by the Hillsboro Square asset. The remaining $2.4 million was allocated among the remaining assets used as collateral to secure the debt pool.
MiMA: TowerNew York, NY
On December 21, 2015, concurrent with the sale of MiMA Tower, the Accounts RGM 42, LLC joint venture investment, in which the Account holds a 70% interest, extinguished its outstanding mortgage debt obligation of $42.8 million (the Accounts share) associated with the property.
Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth a summary regarding the Accounts known contractual obligations, including required interest payments for those items that are interest bearing, as of December 31, 2015 (amounts in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amounts Due During Years Ending December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
Thereafter |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Loans Payable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal Payments |
|
|
$ |
|
34.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
50.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
13.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
107.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
156.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
1,400.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
1,763.7 |
||||||||||||||
Interest Payments(1) |
|
|
69.6 |
|
|
67.3 |
|
|
65.4 |
|
|
64.1 |
|
|
59.1 |
|
|
145.0 |
|
|
470.5 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Mortgage Loans Payable |
|
|
$ |
|
104.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
118.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
79.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
171.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
215.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
1,545.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
2,234.2 |
||||||||||||||
Other Commitments(2) |
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tenant improvements(3) |
|
|
46.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.1 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Contractual Obligations |
|
|
$ |
|
195.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
118.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
79.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
171.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
215.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
1,545.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
2,325.3 |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
These amounts represent interest payments due on mortgage loans payable based on the stated rates at December 31, 2015. |
60
(2) |
This includes the Accounts commitment to purchase interest in its limited partnerships, which could be called by the partner at any time. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) |
This amount represents tenant improvements and leasing inducements committed by the Account as of December 31, 2015. |
The contractual obligations above do not include payments on debt held in joint ventures, which are the obligation of the individual joint venture entities.
Effects of Inflation and Increasing Operating Expenses
Inflation, along with increased insurance, taxes, utilities and security costs, may increase property operating expenses in the future. Any such increases in operating expenses are generally billed to tenants either through contractual lease provisions in office, industrial, and retail properties or through rent increases in apartment complexes. The Account remains responsible for the expenses for unleased space in a property as well as expenses which may not be reimbursed under the terms of an existing lease.
Critical Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements of the Account are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In preparing the Accounts consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Determination of Investments at Fair Value: The Account reports all investments and investment related mortgage loans payable at fair value. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has defined fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used to determine the fair value of the Accounts investments and investment related mortgage payables.
Valuation of Real Estate PropertiesInvestments in real estate properties are stated at fair value, as determined in accordance with policies and procedures reviewed by the Investment Committee of the Board and in accordance with the responsibilities of the Board as a whole. Accordingly, the Account does not record depreciation. Determination of fair value involves judgment because the actual fair value of real estate can be determined only by negotiation between the parties in a sales transaction. The Accounts primary objective when valuing its real estate investments will be to produce a valuation that represents a reasonable estimate of the fair value of its investments. Implicit in the Accounts definition of fair value are the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby:
|
Buyer and seller are typically motivated; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their best interests; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Payment is made in terms of cash or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. |
Property and investment values are affected by, among other things, the availability of capital, occupancy rates, rental rates, and interest and inflation rates. As a result, determining real estate and investment values involves many assumptions. Key inputs and assumptions include rental income and expense amounts, related rental income and expense growth rates, capital expenditures, discount rates and capitalization rates. Valuation techniques include discounted cash flow analysis, prevailing market capitalization rates or multiples applied to earnings from the property, analysis of recent comparable sales transactions, actual sale
61
negotiations and bona fide purchase offers received from third parties. Amounts ultimately realized from each investment may vary significantly from the fair value presented.
Real estate properties owned by the Account are initially valued based on an independent third party appraisal, as reviewed by TIAAs internal appraisal staff and as applicable the Accounts independent fiduciary at the time of the closing of the purchase, which may result in a potential unrealized gain or loss reflecting the difference between an investments fair value (i.e., exit price) and its cost basis (which is inclusive of transaction costs).
Subsequently, each property is appraised each quarter by an independent third party appraiser, reviewed by TIAAs internal appraisal staff and as applicable the Accounts independent fiduciary. In general, the Account obtains appraisals of its real estate properties spread out throughout the quarter, which is intended to result in appraisal adjustments, and thus, adjustments to the valuations of its holdings (to the extent such adjustments are made) that happen regularly throughout each quarter and not on one specific day or month in each period.
Further, management reserves the right to order an appraisal and/or conduct another valuation outside of the normal quarterly process when facts or circumstances at a specific property change. For example, under certain circumstances a valuation adjustment could be made when the account receives a bona fide bid for the sale of a property held within the Account or one of the Accounts joint ventures. In addition, adjustments may be made for events or circumstances indicating an impairment of a tenants ability to pay amounts due to the Account under a lease (including due to a bankruptcy filing of that tenant). Alternatively, adjustments may be made to reflect the execution or renewal of a significant lease. Also, adjustments may be made to reflect factors (such as sales values for comparable properties or local employment rate) bearing uniquely on a particular region in which the Account holds properties. TIAAs internal appraisal staff oversees the entire appraisal process, in conjunction with the Accounts independent fiduciary (the independent fiduciary is more fully described in the paragraph below). Any differences in the conclusions of TIAAs internal appraisal staff and the independent appraiser will be reviewed by the independent fiduciary, which will make a final determination on the matter (which may include ordering a subsequent independent appraisal).
The independent fiduciary, RERC, has been appointed by a special subcommittee of the Investment Committee of the Board to, among other things, oversee the appraisal process. The independent fiduciary must approve all independent appraisers used by the Account. All appraisals are performed in accordance with Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practices, the real estate appraisal industry standards created by The Appraisal Foundation. Real estate appraisals are estimates of property values based on a professionals opinion. Appraisals of properties held outside of the U.S. are performed in accordance with industry standards commonly applied in the applicable jurisdiction. These independent appraisers are always expected to be MAI-designated members of the Appraisal Institute (or its European equivalent, Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors) and state certified appraisers from national or regional firms with relevant property type experience and market knowledge. Under the Accounts current procedures, each independent appraisal firm will be rotated off of a particular property at least every three years, although such appraisal firm may perform appraisals of other Account properties subsequent to such rotation.
Also, the independent fiduciary can require additional appraisals if factors or events have occurred that could materially change a propertys value (including those identified above) and such change is not reflected in the quarterly valuation review, or otherwise to ensure that the Account is valued appropriately. The independent fiduciary must also approve any valuation change of real estate-related assets where a propertys value changed by more than 6% from the most recent independent annual appraisal, or if the value of the Account would change by more than 4% within any calendar quarter or more than 2% since the prior calendar month. When a real estate property is subject to a mortgage, the property is valued independently of the mortgage and the property and mortgage fair values are reported separately (see Valuation of Mortgage Loans Payable). The independent fiduciary reviews and approves all mortgage valuation adjustments before such adjustments are recorded by the Account. The Account continues to use the revised value for each real estate property and mortgage loan payable to calculate the Accounts daily net asset value until the next valuation review or appraisal.
Valuation of Real Estate Joint VenturesReal estate joint ventures are stated at the fair value of the Accounts ownership interests of the underlying entities. The Accounts ownership interests are valued based
62
on the fair value of the underlying real estate, any related mortgage loans payable, and other factors, such as ownership percentage, ownership rights, buy/sell agreements, distribution provisions and capital call obligations. Upon the disposition of all real estate investments by an investee entity, the Account will continue to state its equity in the remaining net assets of the investee entity during the wind down period, if any, at fair value until the dissolution of the investee entity.
Valuation of Real Estate Limited PartnershipsLimited partnership interests are stated at the fair value of the Accounts ownership in the partnership which are recorded based upon the changes in the net asset values of the limited partnerships as determined from the financial statements of the limited partnerships when received by the Account. Prior to the receipt of the financial statements from the limited partnerships, the Account estimates the value of its interest in good faith and will from time to time seek input from the issuer or the sponsor of the investments. Since market quotations are not readily available, the limited partnership interests are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by management under the direction of the Investment Committee of the Board and in accordance with the responsibilities of the Board as a whole.
Valuation of Marketable SecuritiesEquity securities listed or traded on any national market or exchange are valued at the last sale price as of the close of the principal securities market or exchange on which such securities are traded or, if there is no sale, at the mean of the last bid and asked prices on such market or exchange, exclusive of transaction costs.
Debt securities with readily available market quotations, other than money market instruments, are generally valued at the most recent bid price or the equivalent quoted yield for such securities (or those of comparable maturity, quality and type). Debt securities, for which market quotations are not readily available, are valued at their fair value as determined in good faith by the Investment Committee of the Board and in accordance with the responsibilities of the Board as a whole.
Short-term investments are valued in the same manner as debt securities, as described above.
Money market instruments are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
Equity and fixed income securities traded on a foreign exchange or in foreign markets are valued using their closing values under the valuation methods generally accepted in the country where traded, as of the valuation date. This value is converted to U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect on the valuation day. Under certain circumstances (for example, if there are significant movements in the United States markets and there is an expectation the securities traded on foreign markets will adjust based on such movements when the foreign markets open the next day), the Account may adjust the value of equity or fixed income securities that trade on a foreign exchange or market after the foreign exchange or market has closed.
Valuation of Loans ReceivableLoans receivable are stated at fair value and are initially valued at the face amount of the loan funding. Subsequently, loans receivable are valued at least quarterly by TIAAs internal valuation department based on market factors, such as market interest rates and spreads for comparable loans, the liquidity for loans of similar characteristics, the performance of the underlying collateral (such as the loan-to-value ratio and the cash flow of the underlying collateral) and the credit quality of the counterparty. The independent fiduciary reviews and approves all loan receivable valuations adjustments before such adjustments are recorded by the Account. The Account continues to use the revised value for each loan receivable to calculate the Accounts daily net asset value until the next valuation review.
Valuation of Loans PayableLoans payable are stated at fair value. The estimated fair value of loans payable are based on the amount at which the liability could be transferred to a third party exclusive of transaction costs. Loans payable are valued internally by TIAAs internal appraisal department and reviewed by the Accounts independent fiduciary, at least quarterly based on market factors, such as market interest rates and spreads for comparable loans, the performance of the underlying collateral (such as the loan-to-value ratio and the cash flow of the underlying collateral), the liquidity for loans of similar characteristics, the maturity date of the loan, the return demands of the market.
Foreign currency transactions and translation: Portfolio investments and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing at the end of the period. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts and expense payments made in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing on the respective dates of the
63
transactions. The effect of any changes in foreign currency exchange rates on portfolio investments and mortgage loans payable are included in net realized and unrealized gains and losses on real estate properties and mortgage loans payable. Net realized gains and losses on foreign currency transactions include disposition of foreign currencies, and currency gains and losses between the accrual and receipt dates of portfolio investment income and between the trade and settlement dates of portfolio investment transactions.
Accumulation and Annuity Funds: The accumulation fund represents the net assets attributable to participants in the accumulation phase of their investment (Accumulation Fund). The annuity fund represents the net assets attributable to the participants currently receiving annuity payments (Annuity Fund). The net increase or decrease in net assets from investment operations is apportioned between the accounts based upon their relative daily net asset values. Once an Account participant begins receiving lifetime annuity income benefits, payment levels cannot be reduced as a result of the Accounts adverse mortality experience. In addition, the contracts pursuant to which the Account is offered are required to stipulate the maximum expense charge for all Account level expenses that can be assessed, which is not to exceed 2.5% of average net assets per year. The Account pays a fee to TIAA to assume mortality and expense risks.
Accounting for Investments: The investments held by the Account are accounted for as follows:
Real Estate PropertiesRent from real estate properties consists of all amounts earned under tenant operating leases, including base rent, recoveries of real estate taxes and other expenses and charges for miscellaneous services provided to tenants. Rental income is recognized in accordance with the billing terms of the lease agreements. The Account bears the direct expenses of the real estate properties owned. These expenses include, but are not limited to, fees to local property management companies, property taxes, utilities, maintenance, repairs, insurance, and other operating and administrative costs. An estimate of the net operating income earned from each real estate property is accrued by the Account on a daily basis and such estimates are adjusted when actual operating results are determined.
Real Estate Joint VenturesThe Account has limited ownership interests in various real estate joint ventures (collectively, the joint ventures). The Account records its contributions as increases to its investments in the joint ventures, and distributions from the joint ventures are treated as income within income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships in the Accounts consolidated statements of operations. Distributions that are identified as returns of capital are recorded as a reduction to the cost basis of the investment, whereas distributions identified as capital gains or losses are recorded as realized gains or losses. Income from the joint ventures is recorded based on the Accounts proportional interest of the income distributed by the joint ventures. Income earned by the joint ventures, but not yet distributed to the Account by the joint ventures is recorded as unrealized gains and losses.
Limited PartnershipsThe Account has limited ownership interests in various private real estate funds (primarily limited partnerships) and a private real estate investment trust (collectively, the limited partnerships). The Account records its contributions as increases to the investments, and distributions from the investments are treated as income within income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships in the Accounts consolidated statements of operations. Distributions that are identified as returns of capital are recorded as a reduction to the cost basis of the investment, whereas distributions identified as capital gains or losses are recorded as realized gains or losses. Unrealized gains and losses are recorded based upon the changes in the net asset values of the limited partnerships as determined from the financial statements of the limited partnerships when received by the Account. Prior to the receipt of the financial statements from the limited partnerships, the Account estimates the value of its interest in good faith and will from time to time seek input from the issuer or the sponsor of the investment. Changes in value based on such estimates are recorded by the Account as unrealized gains and losses.
Marketable SecuritiesTransactions in marketable securities are accounted for as of the date the securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Interest income is recorded as earned. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date within dividend income. Dividends that are identified as returns of capital are recorded as a reduction to the cost basis of the investment, whereas dividends identified as capital gains or losses are recorded as realized gains or losses. Realized gains and losses on securities transactions are accounted for on the specific identification method.
Loan ReceivableThe Account has a single ownership interest in a loan receivable. Loans receivable are stated at fair value and are initially valued at the face amount of the loan funding. Subsequently, loans receivable are valued at least quarterly by TIAAs internal valuation department with changes in fair value
64
flowing through unrealized gain (loss). Interest income from loans receivable is recognized using the effective interest method over the expected life of the loan.
Realized and Unrealized Gains and LossesUnrealized gains and losses are recorded as the fair values of the Accounts investments are adjusted, and as discussed within the Real Estate Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships sections above. Realized gains and losses are recorded at the time an investment is sold or a distribution is received from the joint ventures or limited partnerships. Real estate transactions are accounted for as of the date on which the purchase or sale transactions for the real estate properties close (settlement date). The Account recognizes a realized gain on the sale of a real estate property to the extent that the contract sales price exceeds the cost-to-date of the property being sold. A realized loss occurs when the cost-to-date exceeds the sales price.
Net AssetsThe Accounts net assets as of the close of each valuation day are valued by taking the sum of:
|
the value of the Accounts cash, cash equivalents, and short-term and other debt instruments; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
the value of the Accounts other securities and other non-real estate assets; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
the value of the individual real properties (based on the most recent valuation of that property) and other real estate-related investments owned by the Account; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
an estimate of the net operating income accrued by the Account from its properties, other real estate-related investments and non-real estate-related investments (including short-term marketable securities) since the end of the prior valuation day; and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
actual net operating income earned from the Accounts properties, other real estate-related investments and non-real estate-related investments (but only to the extent any such item of income differs from the estimated income accrued for on such investments), |
and then reducing the sum by liabilities held within the Account, including the daily investment management fee, administration and distribution fees and certain other expenses attributable to operating the Account.
After the end of every quarter, the Account reconciles the amount of expenses deducted from the Account (which is established in order to approximate the costs that the Account will incur) with the expenses the Account actually incurred. If there is a difference, the Account adds it to or deducts it from the Account in equal daily installments over the remaining days of the following quarter. Material differences may be repaid in the current calendar quarter. The Accounts at-cost deductions are based on projections of Account assets and overall expenses, and the size of any adjusting payments will be directly affected by the difference between managements projections and the Accounts actual assets or expenses.
Federal Income Taxes: Based on provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, Section 817, the Account is taxed as a segregated asset account of TIAA and as such, the Account should incur no material federal income tax attributable to the net investment activity of the Account.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
The Accounts real estate holdings, including real estate joint ventures, limited partnerships and loan receivable, which, as of December 31, 2015, represented 78.4% of the Accounts total investments, expose the Account to a variety of risks. These risks include, but are not limited to:
|
General Real Estate RiskThe risk that the Accounts property values or rental and occupancy rates could go down due to general economic conditions, a weak market for real estate generally, disruptions in the credit and/or capital markets, or changing supply and demand for certain types of properties; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Appraisal RiskThe risk that the sale price of an Account property (i.e., the value that would be determined by negotiations between independent parties) might differ substantially from its estimated or appraised value, leading to losses or reduced profits to the Account upon sale; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Risk Relating to Property SalesThe risk that the Account might not be able to sell a property at a particular time for its full value, particularly in a poor market. This might make it difficult to raise cash quickly and also could lead to Account losses; |
65
|
Risks of BorrowingThe risk that interest rate changes may impact Account returns if the Account takes out a mortgage on a property, buys a property subject to a mortgage or holds a property subject to a mortgage, and hedging against such interest rate changes, if undertaken by the Account, may entail additional costs and be unsuccessful; and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign Currency RiskThe risk that the value of the Accounts foreign investments, related debt, or rental income could increase or decrease due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates or foreign currency exchange control regulations, and hedging against such currency changes, if undertaken by the Account, may entail additional costs and be unsuccessful. |
The Account believes the diversification of its real estate portfolio, both geographically and by sector, along with its quarterly valuation procedure, helps manage the real estate and appraisal risks described above.
As of December 31, 2015, 21.6% of the Accounts total investments were comprised of marketable securities. Marketable securities include high-quality debt instruments (i.e., government agency notes) and REIT securities. The consolidated statement of investments for the Account sets forth the general financial terms of these instruments, along with their fair values, as determined in accordance with procedures described earlier in Critical Accounting Policies section above and in Note 1Organization and Significant Accounting Policies to the Accounts consolidated financial statements included herewith. As of the date of this report, the Account does not invest in derivative financial investments, nor does the Account engage in any hedging activity, although it may do so in selected circumstances in the future.
Risks associated with investments in real estate-related liquid assets (which could include, from time to time, REIT securities and CMBS), and non-real estate-related liquid assets, including financial/credit risk, market volatility risk, interest rate volatility risk and deposit/money market risk.
|
Financial/Credit RiskThe risk, for debt securities, that the issuer will not be able to pay principal and interest when due (and/or declare bankruptcy or be subject to receivership) and, for equity securities such as common or preferred stock, that the issuers current earnings will fall or that its overall financial soundness will decline, reducing the securitys value. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Market Volatility RiskThe risk that the Accounts investments will experience price volatility due to changing conditions in the financial markets regardless of the credit quality or financial condition of the underlying issuer. This risk is particularly acute to the extent the Account holds equity securities, which have experienced significant short-term price volatility over the past year. Also, to the extent the Account holds debt securities, changes in overall interest rates can cause price fluctuations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest Rate VolatilityThe risk that interest rate volatility may affect the Accounts current income from an investment. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deposit/Money Market RiskThe risk that, to the extent the Accounts cash held in bank deposit accounts exceeds federally insured limits as to that bank, the Account could experience losses if banks fail. The Account does not believe it has exposure to significant concentration of deposit risk. In addition, there is some risk that investments held in money market accounts can suffer losses. |
In addition, to the extent the Account were to hold mortgage-backed securities (including commercial mortgage-backed securities) these securities are subject to prepayment risk or extension risk (i.e., the risk that borrowers will repay the loans earlier or later than anticipated). If the underlying mortgage assets experience faster than anticipated repayments of principal, the Account could fail to recoup some or all of its initial investment in these securities, since the original price paid by the Account was based in part on assumptions regarding the receipt of interest payments. If the underlying mortgage assets are repaid later than anticipated, the Account could lose the opportunity to reinvest the anticipated cash flows at a time when interest rates might be rising. The rate of prepayment depends on a variety of geographic, social and other functions, including prevailing market interest rates and general economic factors. The fair value of these securities is also highly sensitive to changes in interest rates. Note that the potential for appreciation, which could otherwise be expected to result from a decline in interest rates, may be limited by any increased prepayments. These securities may be harder to sell than other securities.
In addition to these risks, real estate equity securities (such as REIT stocks and mortgage-backed securities) would be subject to many of the same general risks inherent in real estate investing, making mortgage loans and investing in debt securities. For more information on the risks associated with all of the Accounts investments, see Item 1A. Risk Factors in this Form 10-K.
66
ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
|
|
|
|||||
|
Page |
||||||
|
|
68 |
|||||
|
|
69 |
|||||
|
|
70 |
|||||
|
|
70 |
|||||
|
|
71 |
|||||
|
|
72 |
|||||
|
|
73 |
|||||
|
|
74 |
|||||
|
|
91 |
|||||
|
|
106 |
67
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY
To the Participants of the TIAA Real Estate Account:
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the TIAA Real Estate Account (Account) of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (TIAA) are the responsibility of TIAAs management. They have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and have been presented fairly and objectively in accordance with such principles.
TIAA has established and maintains an effective system of internal controls over financial reporting designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are properly safeguarded, that transactions are properly executed in accordance with managements authorization, and to carry out the ongoing responsibilities of management for reliable consolidated financial statements. In addition, TIAAs internal audit personnel provide regular reviews and assessments of the internal controls and operations of the Account, and the Senior Managing Director, Chief Auditor of Internal Audit regularly reports to the Audit Committee of the TIAA Board of Trustees.
The independent registered public accounting firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013. To maintain auditor independence and avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest, it continues to be the Accounts policy (consistent with TIAAs specific auditor independence policies, which are designed to avoid such conflicts) that any management advisory or consulting services would be obtained from a firm other than the independent accounting firm. The independent auditors report expresses an independent opinion on the fairness of presentation of the Accounts consolidated financial statements.
The Audit Committee of the TIAA Board of Trustees, comprised entirely of independent, non-management trustees, meets regularly with management, representatives of the independent registered public accounting firm and internal audit group personnel to review matters relating to financial reporting, internal controls and auditing. In addition to the annual independent audit of the Accounts consolidated financial statements, the New York State Insurance Department and other state insurance departments regularly examine the operations and consolidated financial statements of the Account as part of their periodic corporate examinations.
|
|
|
March 10, 2016 |
/s/ Robert G. Leary |
|
|
Robert G. Leary |
|
|
/s/ Virginia M. Wilson |
|
|
Virginia M. Wilson |
68
To the Participants of the TIAA Real Estate Account:
The TIAA Audit Committee (Committee) oversees the financial reporting process of the TIAA Real Estate Account (Account) on behalf of TIAAs Board of Trustees. The Committee operates in accordance with a formal written charter (copies of which are available upon request) which describes the Audit Committees responsibilities. All members of the Committee are independent, as defined under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.
Management has the primary responsibility for the Accounts consolidated financial statements, development and maintenance of a strong system of internal controls and disclosure controls, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Committee reviewed and approved the audit plans of the internal audit group and the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with their respective audits of the Account. The Committee also meets regularly with the internal audit group and the independent registered public accounting firm, both with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluation of internal controls, and the overall quality of financial reporting. As required by its charter, the Committee will formally evaluate rotation of the independent registered public accounting firm whenever circumstances warrant, but in no event will the evaluation be less frequent than every ten years of the engagement.
The Committee reviewed and discussed the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements with management, including a discussion of the quality and appropriateness of the accounting principles and financial reporting practices followed, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity and completeness of disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The Committee has also discussed the audited consolidated financial statements with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of these audited consolidated financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The discussion with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP focused on their judgments concerning the quality and appropriateness of the accounting principles and financial reporting practices followed by the Account, the clarity and completeness of the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, and other significant matters, such as any significant changes in accounting policies, internal controls, management judgments and estimates, and the nature of any uncertainties or unusual transactions. In addition, the Committee discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the auditors independence from management and the Account, and has received a written disclosure regarding such independence, as required by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Committee has approved the release of the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements for publication and filing with appropriate regulatory authorities.
Jeffrey R. Brown, Audit Committee Chair
James R. Chambers, Audit Committee Member
Lisa W. Hess, Audit Committee Member
Lawrence H. Linden, Audit Committee Member
Maureen OHara, Audit Committee Member
Donald K. Peterson, Audit Committee Member
March 10, 2016
69
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
(In millions, except per accumulation unit amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
December 31, |
|||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
|||||||||||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Investments, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Real estate properties |
|
|
$ |
|
14,606.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
13,139.0 |
||||
Real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships |
|
|
4,213.2 |
|
|
3,379.6 |
||||||||
Marketable securities: |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Real estate related |
|
|
1,024.4 |
|
|
1,818.4 |
||||||||
Other |
|
|
4,207.2 |
|
|
3,831.1 |
||||||||
Loan receivable |
|
|
100.6 |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total investments |
|
|
24,151.6 |
|
|
22,168.1 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
36.5 |
||||||||
Due from investment manager |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
7.2 |
||||||||
Other |
|
|
230.2 |
|
|
196.9 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
|
24,399.4 |
|
|
22,408.7 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Mortgage loans payable, at fair valueNote 8 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
(principal outstanding: $1,763.7 and $2,337.5) |
|
|
1,794.4 |
|
|
2,373.8 |
||||||||
Accrued real estate property expenses |
|
|
191.5 |
|
|
165.5 |
||||||||
Other |
|
|
53.5 |
|
|
40.4 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
|
2,039.4 |
|
|
2,579.7 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIESNote 11 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
NET ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Accumulation Fund |
|
|
21,898.6 |
|
|
19,409.7 |
||||||||
Annuity Fund |
|
|
461.4 |
|
|
419.3 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS |
|
|
$ |
|
22,360.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
19,829.0 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
NUMBER OF ACCUMULATION UNITS OUTSTANDINGNote 10 |
|
|
60.4 |
|
|
57.9 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, PER ACCUMULATION UNITNote 9 |
|
|
$ |
|
362.773 |
|
|
$ |
|
335.393 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to the consolidated financial statements
70
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Years Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Real estate income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Rental income |
|
|
$ |
|
919.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
897.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
831.5 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Real estate property level expenses and taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
|
|
207.4 |
|
|
208.0 |
|
|
202.4 |
||||||||||||
Real estate taxes |
|
|
144.4 |
|
|
134.1 |
|
|
121.3 |
||||||||||||
Interest expense |
|
|
81.1 |
|
|
98.7 |
|
|
116.8 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total real estate property level expenses and taxes |
|
|
432.9 |
|
|
440.8 |
|
|
440.5 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Real estate income, net |
|
|
486.2 |
|
|
457.0 |
|
|
391.0 |
||||||||||||
Income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships |
|
|
140.1 |
|
|
148.1 |
|
|
104.7 |
||||||||||||
Interest |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
2.9 |
||||||||||||
Dividends |
|
|
47.5 |
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
42.2 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENT INCOME |
|
|
683.9 |
|
|
652.8 |
|
|
540.8 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Investment advisory charges |
|
|
69.3 |
|
|
70.7 |
|
|
59.3 |
||||||||||||
Administrative charges |
|
|
56.9 |
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
41.7 |
||||||||||||
Distribution charges |
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
12.8 |
||||||||||||
Mortality and expense risk charges |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
0.8 |
||||||||||||
Liquidity guarantee charges |
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
30.5 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
TOTAL EXPENSES |
|
|
182.9 |
|
|
163.0 |
|
|
145.1 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT INCOME, NET |
|
|
501.0 |
|
|
489.8 |
|
|
395.7 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS AND MORTGAGE LOANS PAYABLE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Real estate properties |
|
|
215.4 |
|
|
69.0 |
|
|
(210.0 |
) |
|
||||||||||
Real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships |
|
|
167.3 |
|
|
(34.7 |
) |
|
|
|
(153.0 |
) |
|
||||||||
Marketable securities |
|
|
235.8 |
|
|
65.4 |
|
|
31.6 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments |
|
|
618.5 |
|
|
99.7 |
|
|
(331.4 |
) |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Real estate properties |
|
|
487.2 |
|
|
918.8 |
|
|
863.1 |
||||||||||||
Real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships |
|
|
288.6 |
|
|
372.0 |
|
|
479.0 |
||||||||||||
Marketable securities |
|
|
(255.1 |
) |
|
|
|
302.8 |
|
|
(41.7 |
) |
|
||||||||
Loans receivable |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Mortgage loans payable |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
(64.9 |
) |
|
|
|
91.2 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation on |
|
|
526.9 |
|
|
1,528.7 |
|
|
1,391.6 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED |
|
|
1,145.4 |
|
|
1,628.4 |
|
|
1,060.2 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS |
|
|
$ |
|
1,646.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
2,118.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
1,455.9 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to the consolidated financial statements
71
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Years Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||
FROM OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Investment income, net |
|
|
$ |
|
501.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
489.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
395.7 |
||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments |
|
|
618.5 |
|
|
99.7 |
|
|
(331.4 |
) |
|
||||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments and mortgage loans payable |
|
|
526.9 |
|
|
1,528.7 |
|
|
1,391.6 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS |
|
|
1,646.4 |
|
|
2,118.2 |
|
|
1,455.9 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
FROM PARTICIPANT TRANSACTIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Premiums |
|
|
2,852.3 |
|
|
2,432.6 |
|
|
2,439.0 |
||||||||||||
Liquidity units redeemed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(325.4 |
) |
|
||||||||||
Annuity payments |
|
|
(36.7 |
) |
|
|
|
(31.6 |
) |
|
|
|
(28.3 |
) |
|
||||||
Withdrawals and death benefits |
|
|
(1,931.0 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,598.1 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,494.4 |
) |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS |
|
|
884.6 |
|
|
802.9 |
|
|
590.9 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS |
|
|
2,531.0 |
|
|
2,921.1 |
|
|
2,046.8 |
||||||||||||
NET ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
|
|
19,829.0 |
|
|
16,907.9 |
|
|
14,861.1 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
End of period |
|
|
$ |
|
22,360.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
19,829.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
16,907.9 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to the consolidated financial statements
72
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
|
|
$ |
|
1,646.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
2,118.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
1,455.9 |
||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net changes in net assets resulting from operations to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net realized (gain) loss on investments |
|
|
(618.5 |
) |
|
|
|
(99.7 |
) |
|
|
|
331.4 |
||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments and mortgage loans payable |
|
|
(526.9 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,528.7 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,391.6 |
) |
|
||||||
Reinvestment of limited partnership distribution |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Purchase of real estate properties |
|
|
(1,229.6 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,368.2 |
) |
|
|
|
(582.0 |
) |
|
||||||
Capital improvements on real estate properties |
|
|
(167.9 |
) |
|
|
|
(206.7 |
) |
|
|
|
(196.1 |
) |
|
||||||
Proceeds from sale of real estate properties |
|
|
442.9 |
|
|
933.8 |
|
|
435.8 |
||||||||||||
Purchases of long term investments |
|
|
(1,101.1 |
) |
|
|
|
(458.9 |
) |
|
|
|
(370.2 |
) |
|
||||||
Proceeds from long term investments |
|
|
1,499.8 |
|
|
431.9 |
|
|
224.9 |
||||||||||||
Increase in loans receivable |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Increase in other investments |
|
|
(376.5 |
) |
|
|
|
(711.8 |
) |
|
|
|
(550.0 |
) |
|
||||||
Change in due to (from) investment manager |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
|
||||||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
|
|
(33.3 |
) |
|
|
|
85.7 |
|
|
(21.4 |
) |
|
||||||||
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities |
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
8.6 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
NET CASH USED IN |
|
|
(535.4 |
) |
|
|
|
(810.8 |
) |
|
|
|
(667.8 |
) |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Mortgage loan proceeds received |
|
|
|
|
|
252.5 |
|
|
900.0 |
||||||||||||
Payments of mortgage loans |
|
|
(373.8 |
) |
|
|
|
(222.7 |
) |
|
|
|
(830.2 |
) |
|
||||||
Premiums |
|
|
2,852.3 |
|
|
2,432.6 |
|
|
2,439.0 |
||||||||||||
Liquidity units redeemed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(325.4 |
) |
|
||||||||||
Annuity payments |
|
|
(36.7 |
) |
|
|
|
(31.6 |
) |
|
|
|
(28.3 |
) |
|
||||||
Withdrawals and death benefits |
|
|
(1,931.0 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,598.1 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,494.4 |
) |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY |
|
|
510.8 |
|
|
832.7 |
|
|
660.7 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN |
|
|
(24.6 |
) |
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
|
||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
|
|
36.5 |
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
21.7 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
End of period |
|
|
$ |
|
11.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
36.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
14.6 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
|
|
$ |
|
82.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
100.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
116.2 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Loan assignment as part of a real estate disposition |
|
|
$ |
|
200.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Conversion of note receivable |
|
|
$ |
|
100.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to the consolidated financial statements
73
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Business: The TIAA Real Estate Account (Account) is an insurance separate account of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (TIAA) and was established by resolution of TIAAs Board of Trustees (the Board) on February 22, 1995, under the insurance laws of the State of New York, for the purpose of funding variable annuity contracts issued by TIAA. The Account offers individual and group accumulating annuity contracts (with contributions made on a pre-tax or after-tax basis), as well as individual lifetime and term-certain variable payout annuity contracts (including the payment of death benefits to beneficiaries). Investors are entitled to transfer funds to or from the Account, and make withdrawals from the Account on a daily basis, under certain circumstances. Funds invested in the Account for each category of contract are expressed in terms of units, and unit values will fluctuate depending on the Accounts performance.
The investment objective of the Account is to seek favorable long-term returns primarily through rental income and capital appreciation from real estate and real estate-related investments owned by the Account. The Account holds real estate properties directly and through subsidiaries wholly owned by TIAA for the benefit of the Account. The Account also holds interests in real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships in which the Account does not hold a controlling interest; as such, such interests are not consolidated into these consolidated financial statements. The Account also holds an investment in a loan receivable with a commercial real estate property as underlying collateral. Additionally, the Account invests in real estate-related and non-real estate-related publicly traded securities, cash and other instruments to maintain adequate liquidity levels for operating expenses, capital expenditures and to fund benefit payments (withdrawals, transfers and related transactions).
The consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which requires the use of estimates made by management. Actual results may vary from those estimates and such differences may be material. The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies of the Account.
Basis of Presentation: The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the Account and those subsidiaries wholly owned by TIAA for the benefit of the Account. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions between the Account and such subsidiaries have been eliminated.
The Accumulation Unit Value (AUV) used for financial reporting purposes may differ from the AUV used for processing transactions. The AUV used for financial reporting purposes includes security and participant transactions effective through the period end date to which this report relates. Total return is computed based on the AUV used for processing transactions.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Determination of Investments at Fair Value: The Account reports all investments at fair value in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 946, Financial ServicesInvestment Companies. Further in accordance with the adoption of the fair value option allowed under ASC 825, Financial Instruments, and at the election of Account management, mortgage loans payable are reported at fair value. The FASB has defined fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used to determine the fair value of the Accounts investments and investment related mortgage loans payable.
Valuation of Real Estate PropertiesInvestments in real estate properties are stated at fair value, as determined in accordance with policies and procedures reviewed by the Investment Committee of the Board and in accordance with the responsibilities of the Board as a whole. Accordingly, the Account does not record depreciation. Determination of fair value involves significant levels of judgment because the actual fair value of real estate can be determined only by negotiation between the parties in a sales transaction. The Accounts primary objective when valuing its real estate investments will be to produce a valuation that represents a reasonable estimate of the fair value of its investments. Implicit in the Accounts definition of
74
fair value are the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby:
|
Buyer and seller are typically motivated; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their best interests; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Payment is made in terms of cash or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. |
Property and investment values are affected by, among other things, the availability of capital, occupancy rates, rental rates, and interest and inflation rates. As a result, determining real estate and investment values involves many assumptions. Key inputs and assumptions include rental income and expense amounts, related rental income and expense growth rates, capital expenditures, discount rates and capitalization rates. Valuation techniques include discounted cash flow analysis, prevailing market capitalization rates or multiples applied to earnings from the property, analysis of recent comparable sales transactions, actual sale negotiations and bona fide purchase offers received from third parties. Amounts ultimately realized from each investment may vary significantly from the fair value presented.
Real estate properties owned by the Account are initially valued based on an independent third party appraisal, as reviewed by TIAAs internal appraisal staff and as applicable by the Accounts independent fiduciary at the time of the closing of the purchase. Such initial valuation may result in a potential unrealized gain or loss reflecting the difference between an investments fair value (i.e., exit price) and its cost basis (which is inclusive of transaction costs).
Subsequently, each property is appraised each quarter by an independent third party appraiser, reviewed by TIAAs internal appraisal staff and as applicable the Accounts independent fiduciary. In general, the Account obtains appraisals of its real estate properties spread out throughout the quarter, which is intended to result in appraisal adjustments, and thus, adjustments to the valuations of its holdings (to the extent such adjustments are made) that happen regularly throughout each quarter and not on one specific day or month in each period.
Further, management reserves the right to order an appraisal and/or conduct another valuation outside of the normal quarterly process when facts or circumstances at a specific property change. For example, under certain circumstances a valuation adjustment could be made when the account receives a bona fide bid for the sale of a property held within the Account or one of the Accounts joint ventures. Adjustments may be made for events or circumstances indicating an impairment of a tenants ability to pay amounts due to the Account under a lease (including due to a bankruptcy filing of that tenant). Alternatively, adjustments may be made to reflect the execution or renewal of a significant lease. Also, adjustments may be made to reflect factors (such as sales values for comparable properties or local employment rate) bearing uniquely on a particular region in which the Account holds properties. TIAAs internal appraisal staff oversees the entire appraisal process, in conjunction with the Accounts independent fiduciary (the independent fiduciary is more fully described in the following paragraph). Any differences in the conclusions of TIAAs internal appraisal staff and the independent appraiser will be reviewed by the independent fiduciary, which will make a final determination on the matter (which may include ordering a subsequent independent appraisal).
The independent fiduciary, RERC, LLC, has been appointed by a special subcommittee of the Investment Committee of the Board to, among other things, oversee the appraisal process. The independent fiduciary must approve all independent appraisers used by the Account. All appraisals are performed in accordance with Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practices, the real estate appraisal industry standards created by The Appraisal Foundation. Real estate appraisals are estimates of property values based on a professionals opinion. Appraisals of properties held outside of the U.S. are performed in accordance with industry standards commonly applied in the applicable jurisdiction. These independent appraisers are always expected to be MAI-designated members of the Appraisal Institute (or its European equivalent, Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors) and state certified appraisers from national or regional firms with relevant property type experience and market knowledge. Under the Accounts current procedures, each independent
75
appraisal firm will be rotated off of a particular property at least every three years, although such appraisal firm may perform appraisals of other Account properties subsequent to such rotation.
Also, the independent fiduciary can require additional appraisals if factors or events have occurred that could materially change a propertys value (including those identified above) and such change is not reflected in the quarterly valuation review, or otherwise to ensure that the Account is valued appropriately. The independent fiduciary must also approve any valuation change of real estate-related assets where a propertys value changed by more than 6% from the most recent independent annual appraisal, or if the value of the Account would change by more than 4% within any calendar quarter or more than 2% since the prior calendar month. When a real estate property is subject to a mortgage, the property is valued independently of the mortgage and the property and mortgage fair values are reported separately (see Valuation of Mortgage Loans Payable). The independent fiduciary reviews and approves all mortgage valuation adjustments before such adjustments are recorded by the Account. The Account continues to use the revised value for each real estate property and mortgage loan payable to calculate the Accounts daily net asset value until the next valuation review or appraisal.
Valuation of Real Estate Joint VenturesReal estate joint ventures are stated at the fair value of the Accounts ownership interests of the underlying entities. The Accounts ownership interests are valued based on the fair value of the underlying real estate, any related mortgage loans payable, and other factors, such as ownership percentage, ownership rights, buy/sell agreements, distribution provisions and capital call obligations. Upon the disposition of all real estate investments by an investee entity, the Account will continue to state its equity in the remaining net assets of the investee entity during the wind down period, if any, which occurs prior to the dissolution of the investee entity.
Valuation of Real Estate Limited PartnershipsLimited partnership interests are stated at the fair value of the Accounts ownership in the partnership which are recorded based upon the changes in the net asset values of the limited partnerships as determined from the financial statements of the limited partnerships when received by the Account. Prior to the receipt of the financial statements from the limited partnerships, the Account estimates the value of its interest in good faith and will from time to time seek input from the issuer or the sponsor of the investments. Since market quotations are not readily available, the limited partnership interests are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by management under the direction of the Investment Committee of the Board and in accordance with the responsibilities of the Board as a whole.
Valuation of Marketable SecuritiesEquity securities listed or traded on any national market or exchange are valued at the last sale price as of the close of the principal securities market or exchange on which such securities are traded or, if there is no sale, at the mean of the last bid and asked prices on such market or exchange, exclusive of transaction costs.
Debt securities with readily available market quotations, other than money market instruments, are generally valued at the most recent bid price or the equivalent quoted yield for such securities (or those of comparable maturity, quality and type). Debt securities for which market quotations are not readily available, are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the Investment Committee of the Board and in accordance with the responsibilities of the Board as a whole.
Short-term investments are valued in the same manner as debt securities, as described above.
Money market instruments are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
Equity and fixed income securities traded on a foreign exchange or in foreign markets are valued using their closing values under the valuation methods generally accepted in the country where traded, as of the valuation date. This value is converted to U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect on the valuation day. Under certain circumstances (for example, if there are significant movements in the U.S. markets and there is an expectation the securities traded on foreign markets will adjust based on such movements when the foreign markets open the next day), the Account may adjust the value of equity or fixed income securities that trade on a foreign exchange or market after the foreign exchange or market has closed.
Valuation of Loans ReceivableLoans receivable are stated at fair value and are initially valued at the face amount of the loan funding. Subsequently, loans receivable are valued at least quarterly by TIAAs internal valuation department based on market factors, such as market interest rates and spreads for comparable loans, the liquidity for loans of similar characteristics, the performance of the underlying collateral (such as
76
the loan-to-value ratio and the cash flow of the underlying collateral) and the credit quality of the counterparty. The independent fiduciary reviews and approves all loan receivable valuation adjustments before such adjustments are recorded by the Account. The Account continues to use the revised value for each loan receivable to calculate the Accounts daily net asset value until the next valuation review.
Valuation of Mortgage Loans PayableMortgage loans payable are stated at fair value. The estimated fair values of mortgage loans payable are based on the amount at which the liability could be transferred to a third party exclusive of transaction costs. Mortgage loans payable are valued internally by TIAAs internal valuation department, as reviewed by the Accounts independent fiduciary, at least quarterly based on market factors, such as market interest rates and spreads for comparable loans, the performance of the underlying collateral (such as the loan-to-value ratio and the cash flow of the underlying collateral), the liquidity for mortgage loans of similar characteristics, the maturity date of the loan and the return demands of the market.
See Note 5Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis for further discussion and disclosure regarding the determination of the fair value of the Accounts investments.
Foreign Currency Transactions and Translation: Portfolio investments and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing at the end of the period. Purchases and sales of securities, income receipts and expense payments made in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing on the respective dates of the transactions. The effect of any changes in foreign currency exchange rates on portfolio investments and mortgage loans payable are included in net realized and unrealized gains and losses on real estate properties and mortgage loans payable. Net realized gains and losses on foreign currency transactions include disposition of foreign currencies, and currency gains and losses between the accrual and receipt dates of portfolio investment income and between the trade and settlement dates of portfolio investment transactions.
Accumulation and Annuity Funds: The accumulation fund represents the net assets attributable to participants in the accumulation phase of their investment (Accumulation Fund). The annuity fund represents the net assets attributable to the participants currently receiving annuity payments (Annuity Fund). The net increase or decrease in net assets from investment operations is apportioned between the accounts based upon their relative daily net asset values. Once an Account participant begins receiving lifetime annuity income benefits, payment levels cannot be reduced as a result of the Accounts actual mortality experience. In addition, the contracts pursuant to which the Account is offered are required to stipulate the maximum expense charge for all Account level expenses that can be assessed, which is not to exceed 2.5% of average net assets per year. The Account pays a fee to TIAA to assume mortality and expense risks.
Accounting for Investments: The investments held by the Account are accounted for as follows:
Real Estate PropertiesRent from real estate properties consists of all amounts earned under tenant operating leases, including base rent, recoveries of real estate taxes and other expenses and charges for miscellaneous services provided to tenants. Rental income is recognized in accordance with the billing terms of the lease agreements. The Account bears the direct expenses of the real estate properties owned. These expenses include, but are not limited to, fees to local property management companies, property taxes, utilities, maintenance, repairs, insurance, and other operating and administrative costs. An estimate of the net operating income earned from each real estate property is accrued by the Account on a daily basis and such estimates are adjusted when actual operating results are determined.
Real Estate Joint VenturesThe Account has limited ownership interests in various real estate joint ventures (collectively, the joint ventures). The Account records its contributions as increases to its investments in the joint ventures, and distributions from the joint ventures are treated as income within income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships in the Accounts consolidated statements of operations. Distributions that are identified as returns of capital are recorded as a reduction to the cost basis of the investment, whereas distributions identified as capital gains or losses are recorded as realized gains or losses. Income from the joint ventures is recorded based on the Accounts proportional interest of the income distributed by the joint ventures. Income earned but not yet distributed to the Account by the joint ventures is recorded as unrealized gains and losses.
77
Limited PartnershipsThe Account has limited ownership interests in various private real estate funds (primarily limited partnerships) and a private real estate investment trust (collectively, the limited partnerships). The Account records its contributions as increases to the investments, and distributions from the investments are treated as income within income from real estate joint ventures and limited partnerships in the Accounts consolidated statements of operations. Distributions that are identified as returns of capital are recorded as a reduction to the cost basis of the investment, whereas distributions identified as capital gains or losses are recorded as realized gains or losses. Unrealized gains and losses are recorded based upon the changes in the net asset values of the limited partnerships as determined from the financial statements of the limited partnerships when received by the Account. Prior to the receipt of the financial statements from the limited partnerships, the Account estimates the value of its interest in good faith and will from time to time seek input from the issuer or the sponsor of the investments. Changes in value based on such estimates are recorded by the Account as unrealized gains and losses.
Marketable SecuritiesTransactions in marketable securities are accounted for as of the date the securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Interest income is recorded as earned. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date within dividend income. Dividends that are identified as returns of capital are recorded as a reduction to the cost basis of the investment, whereas dividends identified as capital gains or losses are recorded as realized gains or losses. Realized gains and losses on securities transactions are accounted for on the specific identification method.
Loan ReceivableThe Account has a single ownership interest in a loan receivable. Interest income from the loan receivable is recognized using the effective interest method over the expected life of the loan.
Realized and Unrealized Gains and LossesRealized gains and losses are recorded at the time an investment is sold or a distribution is received in relation to an investment sale from a joint venture or limited partnership. Real estate transactions are accounted for as of the date on which the purchase or sale transactions for the real estate properties close (settlement date). The Account recognizes a realized gain on the sale of a real estate property to the extent that the contract sales price exceeds the cost-to-date of the property being sold. A realized loss occurs when the cost-to-date exceeds the sales price. Unrealized gains and losses are recorded as the fair values of the Accounts investments are adjusted, and as discussed within the Real Estate Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships sections above.
Net AssetsThe Accounts net assets as of the close of each valuation day are valued by taking the sum of:
|
the value of the Accounts cash; cash equivalents, and short-term and other debt instruments; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
the value of the Accounts other securities and other non-real estate assets; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
the value of the individual real properties (based on the most recent valuation of that property) and other real estate-related investments owned by the Account; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
an estimate of the net operating income accrued by the Account from its properties, other real estate-related investments and non-real estate-related investments (including short-term marketable securities) since the end of the prior valuation day; and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
actual net operating income earned from the Accounts properties, other real estate-related investments and non-real estate-related investments (but only to the extent any such item of income differs from the estimated income accrued for on such investments), |
and then reducing the sum by liabilities held within the Account, including the daily investment management fee, administration and distribution fees, mortality and expense fee, and liquidity guarantee fee, and certain other expenses attributable to operating the Account. Daily estimates of net operating income are adjusted to reflect actual net operating income on a monthly basis, at which time such adjustments (if any) are reflected in the Accounts unit value.
After the end of every quarter, the Account reconciles the amount of expenses deducted from the Account (which is established in order to approximate the costs that the Account will incur) with the expenses the Account actually incurred. If there is a difference, the Account adds it to or deducts it from the Account in equal daily installments over the remaining days of the following quarter. Material differences may be repaid in the current calendar quarter. The Accounts at-cost deductions are based on projections of Account assets and overall expenses, and the size of any adjusting payments will be directly affected by the difference between managements projections and the Accounts actual assets or expenses.
78
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents are balances held by the Account in bank deposit accounts which, at times, exceed federally insured limits. The Accounts management monitors these balances to mitigate the exposure of risk due to concentration and has not experienced any losses from such concentration.
Other Assets and Other Liabilities: Other assets and other liabilities consist of operating assets and liabilities utilized and held at each individual real estate property investment. Other assets consist of, amongst other items, cash, tenant receivables and prepaid expenses; whereas other liabilities primarily consist of security deposits.
Federal Income Taxes: Based on provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, Section 817, the Account is taxed as a segregated asset account of TIAA and as such, the Account incurs no material federal income tax attributable to the net investment activity of the Account. The Accounts federal income tax return is generally subject to examination for a period of three years after filed. State and local tax returns may be subject to examination for an additional period of time depending on the jurisdiction. Management has analyzed the Accounts tax positions taken for all open federal income tax years and has concluded that no provision for federal income tax is required in the Accounts consolidated financial statements.
Restricted Cash: The Account held $50.9 million and $20.4 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, in escrow accounts for property taxes, insurance, and various other property related matters as required by certain creditors related to outstanding mortgage loans payable collateralized by certain real estate investments. These amounts are recorded within other assets on the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities. See Note 8Mortgage Loans Payable for additional information regarding the Accounts outstanding mortgage loans payable.
Changes in Net Assets: Premiums include premiums paid by existing accumulation unit holders in the Account and transfers into the Account. Withdrawals and death benefits include withdrawals out of the Account which include transfers out of the Account and required minimum distributions.
Due to/from Investment Manager: Due to/from investment manager represents amounts that are to be paid or received by TIAA on behalf of the Account. Amounts generally are paid or received by the Account within one or two business days and no interest is contractually charged on these amounts.
New Accounting Pronouncement: In February 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (ASU) No. 2015-02, Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis (ASU 2015-02). This ASU amends, amongst other items, the consolidation rules regarding the evaluation of whether a limited partnership or similar entity is a variable interest entity or voting interest entity as well as the elimination of the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership. These amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Management is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2015-02 on the Accounts Consolidated Financial Statements.
In March 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, InterestImputation of Interest (ASU 2015-03). This ASU amends, amongst other items, the presentation of debt issuance costs on an entitys balance sheet. These amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Management is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2015-03 on the Accounts Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-07, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820)-Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent) (ASU 2015-07). This ASU removes the requirement to categorize all investments for which the fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient from the fair value hierarchy. The ASU also removes the requirement to make certain disclosures for investments that are eligible to be measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient. The disclosures are limited to investments for which the entity has elected to measure the fair value using that practical expedient. These amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and are applied retroactively. The Account has early adopted the new disclosure requirements for this filing.
In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15 InterestImputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit
79
Arrangements (ASU 2015-15). This ASU follows ASU 2015-03, which requires entities to present debt issuance costs as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability. ASU 2015-03 does not address how debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements should be presented on the balance sheet or amortized. Given the absence of authoritative guidance within ASU 2015-03 for debt issuance costs related to line-of credit arrangements, ASU 2015-15 clarifies that the SEC staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs rateably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The Account currently is not involved with line-of-credit arrangements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01 Financial Instruments (Topic 825)Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (ASU 2016-01). This ASU amends, amongst other items, certain aspects of the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. These amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017. Management is currently assessing the impact of ASU 2016-01 on the Accounts Consolidated Financial Statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02) which will supersede Topic 840, Leases. This ASU applies to all entities that enter into a lease. Lessees will be required to report assets and liabilities that arise from leases. Lessor accounting is expected to remain unchanged except in certain circumstances. This ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including all interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is currently assessing the impact of ASU 2016-02 on the Accounts Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note 2Management Agreements, Arrangements and Related Party Transactions
Investment advisory services for the Account are provided by TIAA employees, under the direction of the Board and its Investment Committee, pursuant to investment management procedures adopted by TIAA for the Account. TIAAs investment management decisions for the Account are subject to review by the Accounts independent fiduciary. TIAA also provides various portfolio accounting and related services for the Account.
The Account is a party to the Distribution Agreement for the Contracts Funded by the TIAA Real Estate Account (the Distribution Agreement), dated January 1, 2008, by and among TIAA, for itself and on behalf of the Account, and TIAA-CREF Individual and Institutional Services, LLC (Services), a wholly owned subsidiary of TIAA, a registered broker-dealer and a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Pursuant to the Distribution Agreement, Services performs distribution services for the Account which include, among other things, (i) distribution of annuity contracts issued by TIAA and funded by the Account, (ii) advising existing annuity contract owners in connection with their accumulations and (iii) helping employers implement and manage retirement plans. In addition, TIAA performs administrative functions for the Account, which include, among other things, (i) maintaining accounting records and performing accounting services, (ii) receiving and allocating premiums, (iii) calculating and making annuity payments, (iv) processing withdrawal requests, (v) providing regulatory compliance and reporting services, (vi) maintaining the Accounts records of contract ownership and (vii) otherwise assisting generally in all aspects of the Accounts operations. Both distribution services (pursuant to the Distribution Agreement) and administrative services are provided to the Account by Services and TIAA, as applicable, on an at cost basis.
The Distribution Agreement is terminable by either party upon 60 days written notice and terminates automatically upon any assignment thereof.
TIAA and Services provide investment management, administrative and distribution services at cost. TIAA and Services receive payments from the Account on a daily basis according to formulas established each year and adjusted periodically with the objective of keeping the payments as close as possible to the Accounts expenses actually incurred. Any differences between actual expenses and the amounts paid by the Account are adjusted quarterly.
TIAA also provides a liquidity guarantee to the Account, for a fee, to ensure that sufficient funds are available to meet participant transfer and cash withdrawal requests in the event that the Accounts cash flows
80
and liquid investments are insufficient to fund such requests. TIAA ensures sufficient funds are available for such transfer and withdrawal requests by purchasing accumulation units of the Account.
To the extent TIAA owns accumulation units issued pursuant to the liquidity guarantee, the independent fiduciary monitors and oversees, among other things, TIAAs ownership interest in the Account and may require TIAA to eventually redeem some of its units, particularly when the Account has un-invested cash or liquid investments available. TIAA also receives a fee for assuming certain mortality and expense risks.
The expenses for the services noted above that are provided to the Account by TIAA and Services are identified in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and are reflected in Note 9Financial Highlights.
Pursuant to its existing liquidity guarantee obligation, the TIAA General Account purchased in multiple transactions an aggregate of 4.7 million accumulation units (which are generally referred to as liquidity units) in the Account between December 2008 and June 2009 for an aggregate amount of $1.2 billion. TIAA has not purchased additional liquidity units since June 2009.
In accordance with this liquidity guarantee obligation, TIAA guarantees that all participants in the Account may redeem their accumulation units at their accumulation unit value next determined after their transfer or cash withdrawal request is received in good order. Liquidity units owned by TIAA are valued in the same manner as accumulation units owned by the Accounts participants. Management believes that TIAA has the ability to meet its obligations under the liquidity guarantee.
As discussed in the Accounts prospectus and in accordance with a prohibited transaction exemption from the U.S. Department of Labor (PTE 96-76), the Accounts independent fiduciary, RERC, has certain responsibilities with respect to the Account that it has undertaken or is currently undertaking with respect to TIAAs purchase of liquidity units, including among other things, reviewing the purchase and redemption of liquidity units by TIAA to ensure the Account uses the correct unit values. In addition, as set forth in PTE 96-76, the independent fiduciarys responsibilities include:
|
establishing the percentage of total accumulation units that TIAAs ownership should not exceed (the trigger point) and creating a method for changing the trigger point; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
approving any adjustment of TIAAs ownership interest in the Account and, in its discretion, requiring an adjustment if TIAAs ownership of liquidity units reaches the trigger point; and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
once the trigger point has been reached, participating in any program to reduce TIAAs ownership in the Account by utilizing cash flow or liquid investments in the Account, or by utilizing the proceeds from asset sales. The independent fiduciarys role in participating in any such asset sales program would include (i) participating in the selection of properties for sale, (ii) providing sales guidelines and (iii) approving those sales if, in the independent fiduciarys opinion, such sales are desirable to reduce TIAAs ownership of liquidity units. |
The independent fiduciary, which has the right to adjust the trigger point, has established the trigger point at 45% of the outstanding accumulation units and it will continue to monitor TIAAs ownership interest in the Account and provide further recommendations as necessary.
As of March 31, 2013, the independent fiduciary completed the systematic redemption of all of the liquidity units held by TIAA. Approximately one-quarter of such units were redeemed evenly over the business days in each of the months of June, September, December 2012, and March 2013, representing a total of $940.3 million and $325.4 million redeemed during 2012 and 2013, respectively.
TIAA and Services provide certain services to the Account on an at cost basis. See Note 9Financial Highlights for details of the expense charge and expense ratio.
Note 3Credit Risk Concentrations
Concentrations of credit risk may arise when a number of properties or tenants are located in a similar geographic region such that the economic conditions of that region could impact tenants obligations to meet their contractual obligations or cause the values of individual properties to decline. The Account has no significant concentrations of tenants as no single tenant has annual contract rent that makes up more than 3% of the rental income of the Account.
81
The Accounts wholly owned real estate investments and investments in joint ventures are located in the United States. The following table represents the diversification of the Accounts portfolio by region and property type as of December 31, 2015:
Diversification by Fair Value(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
East |
West |
South |
Midwest |
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office |
|
|
20.8 |
% |
|
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
44.5 |
% |
|
||||||||||
Apartment |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
23.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Retail |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
15.1 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
14.3 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Other(2) |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
3.1 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
|
|
38.7 |
% |
|
|
|
37.6 |
% |
|
|
|
22.2 |
% |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Wholly owned properties are represented at fair value and gross of any debt, while joint venture properties are represented at the net equity value. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) |
Represents interest in Storage Portfolio investment and a fee interest encumbered by a ground lease real estate investment. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Properties in the East region are located in: CT, DC, DE, KY, MA, MD, ME, NC, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, SC, VA, VT, WV |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Properties in the West region are located in: AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA, WY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Properties in the South region are located in: AL, AR, FL, GA, LA, MS, OK, TN, TX |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Properties in the Midwest region are located in: IA, IL, IN, KS, MI, MN, MO, ND, NE, OH, SD, WI |
Note 4Leases
The Accounts wholly owned real estate properties are leased to tenants under operating lease agreements which expire on various dates through 2090. Aggregate minimum annual rentals for wholly owned real estate investments owned by the Account through the non-cancelable lease term, excluding short-term residential leases, are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|||||
|
Years Ending |
||||||
2016 |
|
|
$ |
|
561.5 |
||
2017 |
|
|
522.2 |
||||
2018 |
|
|
472.4 |
||||
2019 |
|
|
418.1 |
||||
2020 |
|
|
361.5 |
||||
Thereafter |
|
|
2,879.8 |
||||
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
|
|
$ |
|
5,215.5 |
||
|
|
|
Certain leases provide for additional rental amounts based upon the recovery of actual operating expenses in excess of specified base amounts, sales volume or contractual increases as defined in the lease agreement. These contractual contingent rentals are not included in the table above.
Note 5Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Valuation Hierarchy: The Accounts fair value measurements are grouped categorically into three levels, as defined by the FASB. The levels are defined as follows:
Level 1Valuations using unadjusted quoted prices for assets traded in active markets, such as stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Active markets are defined as having the following characteristics for the measured asset or liability: (i) many transactions, (ii) current prices, (iii) price quotes not varying substantially among market makers, (iv) narrow bid/ask spreads and (v) most information regarding the issuer is publicly available. Level 1 assets held by the Account are generally marketable equity securities.
Level 2Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active, dealer or broker markets. Fair values are primarily obtained from third party pricing services for identical or comparable assets or liabilities. Level 2
82
inputs for fair value measurements are inputs, other than quoted prices included within Level 1, that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include:
a. Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;
b. Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active (that is, markets in which there are few transactions for the asset (or liability), the prices are not current, price quotations vary substantially either over time or among market makers (for example, some brokered markets), or in which little information is released publicly);
c. Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable within the market for the asset (or liability) (for example, interest rates and yield curves, implied volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks, and default rates that are observable at commonly quoted intervals); and
d. Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (for example, market-corroborated inputs).
Examples of securities which may be held by the Account and included in Level 2 include certificates of deposit, commercial paper, government agency notes, variable notes, United States Treasury securities, and debt securities.
Level 3Valuations for assets and liabilities that are derived from other valuation methodologies, including pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, and are not based on market exchange, dealer, or broker-traded transactions. Level 3 valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections that are not observable in the market, and require significant professional judgment in determining the fair value assigned to such assets or liabilities. Examples of Level 3 assets and liabilities which may be held by the Account from time to time include investments in real estate, investments in joint ventures, and loans receivable and payable.
An investments categorization within the valuation hierarchy described above is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Accounts limited partnership investments are valued using the net asset value per share as a practical expedient, which excludes the investments from the valuation hierarchy.
The Accounts determination of fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon vendor-provided, evaluated prices or internally developed models that primarily use market-based or independently sourced market data, including interest rate yield curves, market spreads, and currency rates. Valuation adjustments will be made to reflect changes in credit quality, counterpartys creditworthiness, the Accounts creditworthiness, liquidity, and other observable and unobservable inputs that are applied consistently over time.
The methods described above are considered to produce fair values that represent a good faith estimate of what an unaffiliated buyer in the marketplace would pay to purchase the asset or would receive to transfer the liability. Since fair value calculations involve significant professional judgment in the application of both observable and unobservable attributes, actual realizable values or future fair values may differ from amounts reported. Furthermore, while the Account believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments, while reasonable, could result in different estimates of fair value at the reporting date. As discussed in Note 1Organization and Significant Accounting Policies in more detail, the Account generally obtains independent third party appraisals on a quarterly basis; there may be circumstances in the interim in which the true realizable value of a property is not reflected in the Accounts daily net asset value calculation or in the Accounts periodic consolidated financial statements. This disparity may be more apparent when the commercial and/or residential real estate markets experience an overall and possibly dramatic decline (or increase) in property values in a relatively short period of time between appraisals.
The following tables show the major categories of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
83
(Level 1); significant other observable inputs (Level 2); significant unobservable inputs (Level 3); and Practical Expedient (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description |
Level 1: |
Level 2: |
Level 3: |
Fair Value |
Total at |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate properties |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
14,606.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
14,606.2 |
||||||||||
Real estate joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,068.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,068.4 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Limited partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144.8 |
|
|
144.8 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Marketable securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate related |
|
|
1,024.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,024.4 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Government agency notes |
|
|
|
|
|
2,666.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,666.8 |
||||||||||||||||||||
United States Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
1,540.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,540.4 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Loan receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
100.6 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Investments at |
|
|
$ |
|
1,024.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
4,207.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
18,775.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
144.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
24,151.6 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans payable |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
(1,794.4 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
(1,794.4 |
) |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description |
Level 1: |
Level 2: |
Level 3: |
Fair Value |
Total at |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate properties |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
13,139.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
13,139.0 |
||||||||||
Real estate joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,022.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,022.1 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Limited partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357.5 |
|
|
357.5 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Marketable securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate related |
|
|
1,818.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,818.4 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Government agency notes |
|
|
|
|
|
2,369.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,369.9 |
||||||||||||||||||||
United States Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
1,461.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,461.2 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Investments at |
|
|
$ |
|
1,818.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
3,831.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
16,161.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
357.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
22,168.1 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans payable |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
(2,373.8 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
(2,373.8 |
) |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The Account early adopted Accounting Pronouncement ASU 2015-07, which removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient. |
The following tables show the reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Real Estate |
Real Estate |
Loan |
Total |
Mortgage |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance January 1, 2015 |
|
|
$ |
|
13,139.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
3,022.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
16,161.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
(2,373.8 |
) |
|
||||||||
Total realized and unrealized gains included in changes in net assets |
|
|
702.6 |
|
|
416.0 |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
1,119.2 |
|
|
5.6 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases(1) |
|
|
1,407.5 |
|
|
835.1 |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
2,342.6 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
|
|
(642.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(642.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Settlements(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
(204.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(204.8 |
) |
|
|
|
573.8 |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance December 31, 2015 |
|
|
$ |
|
14,606.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
4,068.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
100.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
18,775.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
(1,794.4 |
) |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Real Estate |
Real Estate |
Total |
Mortgage |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance January 1, 2014 |
|
|
$ |
|
11,565.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
2,563.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
14,128.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
(2,279.1 |
) |
|
||||||
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in changes in net assets |
|
|
987.8 |
|
|
308.4 |
|
|
1,296.2 |
|
|
(64.9 |
) |
|
||||||||||||||
Purchases(1) |
|
|
1,562.5 |
|
|
232.9 |
|
|
1,795.4 |
|
|
(252.5 |
) |
|
||||||||||||||
Sales |
|
|
(976.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(976.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Settlements(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
(82.8 |
) |
|
|
|
(82.8 |
) |
|
|
|
222.7 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance December 31, 2014 |
|
|
$ |
|
13,139.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
3,022.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
16,161.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
(2,373.8 |
) |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes purchases, contributions for joint ventures, capital expenditures and lending for loans receivable. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) |
Includes operating income for real estate joint ventures, net of distributions, and principal payments and extinguishments of mortgage loans payable. |
The following table shows quantitative information about unobservable inputs related to the Level 3 fair value measurements as of December 31, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type |
Asset |
Valuation |
Unobservable Inputs |
Range (Weighted |
||||
|
||||||||
Real Estate Properties |
Office |
Income ApproachDiscounted Cash Flow |
Discount Rate |
6.0%8.3% (6.5%) |
||||
and Joint Ventures |
|
|
|
Terminal Capitalization Rate |
4.3%7.5% (5.5%) |
|||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Income ApproachDirect Capitalization |
Overall Capitalization Rate |
3.8%7.3% (4.7%) |
|||
|
|
|
||||||
|
Industrial |
Income ApproachDiscounted Cash Flow |
Discount Rate |
5.7%8.8% (6.8%) |
||||
|
|
|
|
Terminal Capitalization Rate |
4.9%7.3% (5.7%) |
|||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Income ApproachDirect Capitalization |
Overall Capitalization Rate |
4.0%6.3% (5.1%) |
|||
|
|
|
||||||
|
Residential |
Income ApproachDiscounted Cash Flow |
Discount Rate |
5.3%7.3% (6.2%) |
||||
|
|
|
|
Terminal Capitalization Rate |
4.0%5.8% (4.8%) |
|||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Income ApproachDirect Capitalization |
Overall Capitalization Rate |
3.3%5.3% (4.1%) |
|||
|
|
|
||||||
|
Retail |
Income ApproachDiscounted Cash Flow |
Discount Rate |
5.0%10.4% (6.8%) |
||||
|
|
|
|
Terminal Capitalization Rate |
4.8%9.5% (5.8%) |
|||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Income ApproachDirect Capitalization |
Overall Capitalization Rate |
4.3%8.5% (5.2%) |
|||
|
||||||||
Mortgage Loans Payable |
Office and Industrial |
Discounted Cash Flow |
Loan to Value Ratio |
31.0%47.5% (41.0%) |
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Net Present Value |
Loan to Value Ratio |
31.0%47.5% (41.0%) |
|||
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Cost of Capital Risk |
1.21.3 (1.3) |
|||
|
|
|
||||||
|
Residential |
Discounted Cash Flow |
Loan to Value Ratio |
30.6%63.2% (44.0%) |
||||
|
|
|
|
Equivalency Rate |
2.7%3.5% (3.2%) |
|||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Net Present Value |
Loan to Value Ratio |
30.6%63.2% (44.0%) |
|||
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Cost of Capital Risk |
1.21.5 (1.3) |
|||
|
|
|
||||||
|
Retail |
Discounted Cash Flow |
Loan to Value Ratio |
21.0%49.4% (37.8%) |
||||
|
|
|
|
Equivalency Rate |
2.4%4.0% (3.3%) |
|||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Net Present Value |
Loan to Value Ratio |
21.0%49.4% (37.8%) |
|||
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Cost of Capital Risk |
1.11.3 (1.2) |
|||
|
||||||||
Loan Receivable |
Office |
Discounted Cash Flow |
Loan to Value Ratio |
76.1% (76.1%) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Equivalency Rate |
6.1% (6.1%) |
||
|
Real Estate Properties and Joint Ventures: The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Accounts real estate property and joint venture investments are the selection of certain investment rates (Discount Rate, Terminal Capitalization Rate, and Overall Capitalization Rate). Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation would result in significantly lower (higher) fair value measurements, respectively.
Mortgage Loans Payable: The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Accounts mortgage loans payable are the loan to value ratios and the selection of certain credit spreads and weighted average cost of capital risk premiums. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value, respectively.
85
Loans Receivable: The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Accounts loan receivable are the loan to value ratios and the selection of certain credit spreads. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 there were no transfers between Levels 1, 2 or 3.
The amount of total net unrealized gains (losses) included in changes in net assets attributable to the change in net unrealized gains (losses) relating to Level 3 investments and mortgage loans payable using significant unobservable inputs still held as of the reporting date is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Real Estate |
Real Estate |
Loan |
Total |
Mortgage |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2015 |
|
|
$ |
|
718.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
426.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
1,145.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
5.6 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2014 |
|
|
$ |
|
1,007.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
305.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
1,312.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
(64.9 |
) |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6Investments in Joint Ventures
The Account owns interests in several real estate properties through joint ventures and receives distributions and allocations of profits and losses from the joint ventures based on the Accounts ownership interest in those investments. Several of these joint ventures have mortgage loans payable collateralized by the properties owned by the aforementioned joint ventures. At December 31, 2015, the Account held investments in joint ventures with non-controlling ownership interest percentages that ranged from 33% to 90%. Certain joint ventures are subject to adjusted distribution percentages when earnings in the investment reach a pre-determined threshold. The fair value of the Accounts equity interest in these joint ventures was $4.1 billion and $3.0 billion at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The Accounts most significant joint venture investment is The Florida Mall, which represented 2.9% of the Accounts net assets and 2.7% of the Accounts invested assets at December 31, 2015. The Accounts proportionate share of the mortgage loans payable held within the joint venture investments at fair value was $1.6 billion and $1.8 billion at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The Accounts share in the outstanding principal of the mortgage loans payable held within the joint venture investments was $1.6 billion and $1.7 billion at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
A condensed summary of the financial position and results of operations of the joint ventures are shown below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
December 31, |
|||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
|||||||||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Real estate properties, at fair value |
|
|
$ |
|
9,615.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
7,980.2 |
||||
Other assets |
|
|
256.1 |
|
|
246.8 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total assets |
|
|
$ |
|
9,871.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
8,227.0 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Liabilities & Equity |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Mortgage notes payable and other obligations, at fair value |
|
|
$ |
|
2,487.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
2,750.0 |
||||
Other liabilities |
|
|
162.4 |
|
|
147.0 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,649.9 |
|
|
2,897.0 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Equity |
|
|
7,221.9 |
|
|
5,330.0 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
|
|
$ |
|
9,871.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
8,227.0 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Years Ended |
||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Operating Revenue and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Revenues |
|
|
$ |
|
609.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
612.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
562.5 |
||||||
Expenses |
|
|
318.6 |
|
|
315.8 |
|
|
309.6 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Excess of revenues over expenses |
|
|
$ |
|
290.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
297.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
252.9 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7Investments in Limited Partnerships
The Account invests in limited partnerships, limited liability companies and private real estate equity investment trusts that own real estate properties and real estate related securities including mezzanine debt. The Account receives distributions from these investments based on the Accounts ownership interest percentage. At December 31, 2015, the Account held non-controlling ownership interests in three limited partnerships and one limited liability company ranging from 5.3% to 18.5%. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the fair value of the Accounts ownership interest was $144.8 million and $357.5 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2015, two of the limited partnership investments were in dissolution. Colony Realty Partners LP began liquidation in May 2014 with final dissolution anticipated during 2016. Lion Gables Apartment Fund began liquidation in February 2015 and has dissolved all of the Funds assets. Final dissolution of the entity is anticipated during 2016.
Cobalt Industrial REIT, in which the Account held a 10.998% interest, and Heitman Value Partners Fund, in which the Account held an 8.43% interest, were legally dissolved in December 2015.
Transwestern Mezzanine Realty Partners III may engage in liquidation activities in 2017 based on the terms of its partnership agreement. The Account may elect to sell or transfer its ownership units by giving notice and acquiring consent from the management committee of the limited partnership, which requires approval by a majority of the members.
87
Note 8Mortgage Loans Payable
At December 31, 2015, the Account had outstanding mortgage loans payable secured by the following properties (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Property |
Interest Rate |
Principal |
Maturity |
||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
99 High Street(4) |
5.52% paid monthly |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
185.0 |
|
|
November 11, 2015 |
|||||||||
Lincoln Centre(10) |
5.51% paid monthly |
|
|
|
|
|
153.0 |
|
|
February 1, 2016 |
|||||||||||||
Charleston Plaza(1)(5) |
5.60% paid monthly |
|
|
34.7 |
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
September 11, 2016 |
|||||||||||||
The Legend at Kierland(5)(6) |
4.97% paid monthly |
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
August 1, 2017 |
|||||||||||||
The Tradition at Kierland(5)(6) |
4.97% paid monthly |
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
August 1, 2017 |
|||||||||||||
Mass Court(5) |
2.88% paid monthly |
|
|
92.6 |
|
|
92.6 |
|
|
September 1, 2019 |
|||||||||||||
Red Canyon at Palomino Park(5)(7) |
5.34% paid monthly |
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
August 1, 2020 |
|||||||||||||
Green River at Palomino Park(5)(7) |
5.34% paid monthly |
|
|
33.2 |
|
|
33.2 |
|
|
August 1, 2020 |
|||||||||||||
Blue Ridge at Palomino Park(5)(7) |
5.34% paid monthly |
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
August 1, 2020 |
|||||||||||||
Ashford Meadows(5) |
5.17% paid monthly |
|
|
44.6 |
|
|
44.6 |
|
|
August 1, 2020 |
|||||||||||||
The Corner(5) |
4.66% paid monthly |
|
|
105.0 |
|
|
105.0 |
|
|
June 1, 2021 |
|||||||||||||
The Palatine(5) |
4.25% paid monthly |
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
January 10, 2022 |
|||||||||||||
The Forum at Carlsbad(5) |
4.25% paid monthly |
|
|
90.0 |
|
|
90.0 |
|
|
March 1, 2022 |
|||||||||||||
The Colorado(5) |
3.69% paid monthly |
|
|
91.7 |
|
|
91.7 |
|
|
November 1, 2022 |
|||||||||||||
The Legacy at Westwood(5) |
3.69% paid monthly |
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
November 1, 2022 |
|||||||||||||
Regents Court(5) |
3.69% paid monthly |
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
November 1, 2022 |
|||||||||||||
The Caruth(5) |
3.69% paid monthly |
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
November 1, 2022 |
|||||||||||||
Fourth & Madison(5) |
3.75% paid monthly |
|
|
200.0 |
|
|
200.0 |
|
|
June 1, 2023 |
|||||||||||||
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue |
3.70% paid monthly |
|
|
330.0 |
|
|
330.0 |
|
|
June 1, 2023 |
|||||||||||||
50 Fremont Street(5)(9) |
3.75% paid monthly |
|
|
|
|
|
200.0 |
|
|
June 1, 2023 |
|||||||||||||
1401 H Street NW(5) |
3.65% paid monthly |
|
|
115.0 |
|
|
115.0 |
|
|
November 5, 2024 |
|||||||||||||
780 Third Avenue(5) |
3.55% paid monthly |
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
August 1, 2025 |
|||||||||||||
780 Third Avenue(5) |
3.55% paid monthly |
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
August 1, 2025 |
|||||||||||||
55 Second Street(5)(8) |
3.74% paid monthly |
|
|
137.5 |
|
|
137.5 |
|
|
October 1, 2026 |
|||||||||||||
Publix at Weston Commons(5)(11) |
5.08% paid monthly |
|
|
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
January 1, 2036 |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Principal Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
1,763.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
2,337.5 |
|
|
|||||||||
Fair Value Adjustment(3) |
|
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total mortgage loans payable |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
1,794.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
2,373.8 |
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The mortgage is adjusted monthly for principal payments. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) |
Interest rates are fixed, unless stated otherwise. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) |
The fair value adjustment consists of the difference (positive or negative) between the principal amount of the outstanding debt and the fair value of the outstanding debt. See Note 1Organization and Significant Accounting Policies. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) |
Mortgage loan was paid off on May 11, 2015. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(5) |
These properties are each owned by separate wholly owned subsidiaries of TIAA for benefit of the Account. The assets and credit of each of these borrowings entities are not available to satisfy the debts and other obligations of the Account or any other entity or person other than such borrowing entity. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(6) |
Represents mortgage loans on these individual properties which are held within the Kierland Apartment portfolio. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(7) |
Represents mortgage loans on these individual properties which are held within the Palomino Park portfolio. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(8) |
This mortgage includes three individual loans, all with equal recourse, interest and maturity. The principal balances by loan are $79.0 million, $45.0 million, and $13.5 million. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(9) |
This property was sold on February 12, 2015. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(10) |
Mortgage loan was paid off on August 5, 2015. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(11) |
Mortgage loan was paid off on October 1, 2015. |
88
Principal payment schedule on mortgage loans payable as of December 31, 2015 was as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|||||
|
Amount |
||||||
2016 |
|
|
$ |
|
34.7 |
||
2017 |
|
|
50.8 |
||||
2018 |
|
|
13.8 |
||||
2019 |
|
|
107.4 |
||||
2020 |
|
|
156.2 |
||||
Thereafter |
|
|
1,400.8 |
||||
|
|
|
|||||
Total maturities |
|
|
$ |
|
1,763.7 |
||
|
|
|
Note 9Financial Highlights
Selected condensed financial information for an Accumulation Unit of the Account is presented below. Per Accumulation Unit data is calculated on average units outstanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Years Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Accumulation Unit Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rental income |
|
|
$ |
|
15.538 |
|
|
$ |
|
15.862 |
|
|
$ |
|
15.313 |
|
|
$ |
|
16.345 |
|
|
$ |
|
17.224 |
||||||||||
Real estate property level expenses and taxes |
|
|
7.319 |
|
|
7.788 |
|
|
8.112 |
|
|
9.059 |
|
|
8.640 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate income, net |
|
|
8.219 |
|
|
8.074 |
|
|
7.201 |
|
|
7.286 |
|
|
8.584 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
|
|
3.342 |
|
|
3.459 |
|
|
2.759 |
|
|
2.178 |
|
|
2.143 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total income |
|
|
11.561 |
|
|
11.533 |
|
|
9.960 |
|
|
9.464 |
|
|
10.727 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Expense charges(1) |
|
|
3.092 |
|
|
2.880 |
|
|
2.672 |
|
|
2.562 |
|
|
2.390 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment income, net |
|
|
8.469 |
|
|
8.653 |
|
|
7.288 |
|
|
6.902 |
|
|
8.337 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments and mortgage loans payable |
|
|
18.911 |
|
|
27.868 |
|
|
19.015 |
|
|
18.013 |
|
|
20.144 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase in Accumulation Unit Value |
|
|
27.380 |
|
|
36.521 |
|
|
26.303 |
|
|
24.915 |
|
|
28.481 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulation Unit Value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
|
|
335.393 |
|
|
298.872 |
|
|
272.569 |
|
|
247.654 |
|
|
219.173 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of period |
|
|
$ |
|
362.773 |
|
|
$ |
|
335.393 |
|
|
$ |
|
298.872 |
|
|
$ |
|
272.569 |
|
|
$ |
|
247.654 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total return |
|
|
8.16% |
|
|
12.22% |
|
|
9.65% |
|
|
10.06% |
|
|
12.99% |
||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios to Average net Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses(1) |
|
|
0.86% |
|
|
0.89% |
|
|
0.92% |
|
|
0.95% |
|
|
0.98% |
||||||||||||||||||||
Investment income, net |
|
|
2.37% |
|
|
2.68% |
|
|
2.50% |
|
|
2.55% |
|
|
3.42% |
||||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate properties(2) |
|
|
5.7% |
|
|
6.5% |
|
|
2.1% |
|
|
10.2% |
|
|
3.0% |
||||||||||||||||||||
Marketable securities(3) |
|
|
10.0% |
|
|
15.9% |
|
|
8.4% |
|
|
21.9% |
|
|
3.4% |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulation Units outstanding at end of period (in millions): |
|
|
60.4 |
|
|
57.9 |
|
|
55.3 |
|
|
53.3 |
|
|
53.4 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets end of period (in millions) |
|
|
$ |
|
22,360.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
19,829.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
16,907.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
14,861.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
13,527.2 |
(1) |
Expense charges per Accumulation Unit and the Ratio of Expenses to average net assets reflect the year to date Account level expenses and exclude real estate property level expenses which are included in real estate income, net. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) |
Real estate investment portfolio turnover rate is calculated by dividing the lesser of purchases or sales of real estate property investments (including contributions to, or return of capital distributions received from, existing joint venture and limited partnership investments) by the average value of the portfolio of real estate investments held during the period. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) |
Marketable securities portfolio turnover rate is calculated by dividing the lesser of purchases or sales of securities, excluding securities having maturity dates at acquisition of one year or less, by the average value of the portfolio securities held during the period. |
89
Note 10Accumulation Units
Changes in the number of Accumulation Units outstanding were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2015 |
2014 |
2013 |
||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
|
|
57.9 |
|
|
55.3 |
|
|
53.3 |
||||||||||||
Credited for premiums |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
8.5 |
||||||||||||
Liquidity units redeemed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
||||||||||
Annuity, other periodic payments, withdrawals and death benefits |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
End of period |
|
|
60.4 |
|
|
57.9 |
|
|
55.3 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11Commitments and Contingencies
CommitmentsThe Account had $45.0 million and $0.2 million of outstanding immediately callable commitments to purchase additional interests in its limited partnership investments as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The commitment at December 31, 2015 is related to the Taconic New York City GP Fund, LP, in which the Account has entered into an agreement to provide funding. As of December 31, 2015, no funding payments have been made but once the obligation is funded, the Account anticipates holding a 60%-90% interest in the fund.
The Account has committed a total of $46.1 million and $63.9 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, to various tenants for tenant improvements and leasing inducements.
ContingenciesThe Account is party to various claims and routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Management of the Account does not believe the results of any such claims or litigation, individually, or in the aggregate, will have a material effect on the Accounts business, financial position, or results of operations.
Note 12Subsequent Events
Purchases
430 West 15th StreetNew York, NY
On February 1, 2016, the Account purchased the leasehold interest in a 98,087 square foot, eight-story office property located in New York, New York for $108.4 million. At the time of purchase, the property was 100% leased.
Sales
Residences at Rivers EdgeMedford, MA
On February 12, 2016, the Account sold a multi-family property located in Medford, Massachusetts for a net sales price of $89.4 million, resulting in a realized gain of $8.2 million from the sale, the majority of which had been previously recognized as unrealized gains in the Accounts consolidated statements of operations. The Accounts cost basis in the property at the date of sale was $81.2 million.
90
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES60.5% and 59.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Location / Description |
Type |
Fair Value at |
||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
|||||||||||||||
Arizona: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Camelback Center |
Office |
|
|
$ |
|
51.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
44.5 |
|||||
Kierland Apartment Portfolio |
Apartments |
|
|
119.7 |
(1) |
|
|
|
118.1 |
(1) |
|
|||||
California: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
3 Hutton Centre Drive |
Office |
|
|
57.1 |
|
|
45.5 |
|||||||||
50 Fremont Street |
Office |
|
|
|
|
|
637.6 |
(1) |
|
|||||||
55 Second Street |
Office |
|
|
335.2 |
(1) |
|
|
|
292.2 |
(1) |
|
|||||
88 Kearny Street |
Office |
|
|
165.4 |
|
|
130.7 |
|||||||||
200 Middlefield Road |
Office |
|
|
55.5 |
|
|
51.0 |
|||||||||
Castro Station |
Office |
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
Centre Pointe and Valley View |
Industrial |
|
|
41.3 |
|
|
36.3 |
|||||||||
Cerritos Industrial Park |
Industrial |
|
|
108.7 |
|
|
98.5 |
|||||||||
Charleston Plaza |
Retail |
|
|
88.0 |
(1) |
|
|
|
82.0 |
(1) |
|
|||||
Great West Industrial Portfolio |
Industrial |
|
|
158.3 |
|
|
128.8 |
|||||||||
Holly Street Village |
Apartments |
|
|
130.7 |
|
|
128.3 |
|||||||||
Larkspur Courts |
Apartments |
|
|
135.9 |
|
|
131.6 |
|||||||||
Northern CA RA Industrial Portfolio |
Industrial |
|
|
69.5 |
|
|
56.7 |
|||||||||
Northpark Village Square |
Retail |
|
|
47.6 |
|
|
45.2 |
|||||||||
Oakmont IE West Portfolio |
Industrial |
|
|
76.2 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
Oceano at Warner Center |
Apartments |
|
|
82.5 |
|
|
81.4 |
|||||||||
Ontario Industrial Portfolio |
Industrial |
|
|
421.6 |
|
|
366.4 |
|||||||||
Ontario Mills Industrial Portfolio |
Industrial |
|
|
48.6 |
|
|
39.6 |
|||||||||
Pacific Plaza |
Office |
|
|
94.7 |
|
|
96.1 |
|||||||||
Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Portfolio |
Industrial |
|
|
166.1 |
|
|
143.4 |
|||||||||
Regents Court |
Apartments |
|
|
87.1 |
(1) |
|
|
|
81.8 |
(1) |
|
|||||
Southern CA RA Industrial Portfolio |
Industrial |
|
|
119.3 |
|
|
105.9 |
|||||||||
Stella |
Apartments |
|
|
170.8 |
|
|
170.1 |
|||||||||
Stevenson Point |
Industrial |
|
|
41.6 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
The Forum at Carlsbad |
Retail |
|
|
215.0 |
(1) |
|
|
|
203.0 |
(1) |
|
|||||
The Legacy at Westwood |
Apartments |
|
|
141.4 |
(1) |
|
|
|
134.7 |
(1) |
|
|||||
Township Apartments |
Apartments |
|
|
88.4 |
|
|
86.0 |
|||||||||
West Lake North Business Park |
Office |
|
|
54.4 |
|
|
49.3 |
|||||||||
Westcreek |
Apartments |
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
39.3 |
|||||||||
Westwood Marketplace |
Retail |
|
|
125.3 |
|
|
116.5 |
|||||||||
Wilshire Rodeo Plaza |
Office |
|
|
302.4 |
|
|
209.8 |
|||||||||
Colorado: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Palomino Park |
Apartments |
|
|
302.6 |
(1) |
|
|
|
283.3 |
(1) |
|
|||||
South Denver Marketplace |
Retail |
|
|
70.8 |
|
|
70.6 |
|||||||||
Connecticut: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Wilton Woods Corporate Campus |
Office |
|
|
141.3 |
|
|
142.8 |
|||||||||
Florida: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
701 Brickell Avenue |
Office |
|
|
371.0 |
|
|
320.1 |
|||||||||
Casa Palma |
Apartments |
|
|
92.7 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
Publix at Weston Commons |
Retail |
|
|
68.2 |
|
|
58.0 |
(1) |
|
|||||||
Seneca Industrial Park |
Industrial |
|
|
87.9 |
|
|
79.2 |
|||||||||
South Florida Apartment Portfolio |
Apartments |
|
|
93.1 |
|
|
84.1 |
|||||||||
The Manor Apartments |
Apartments |
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
52.6 |
|||||||||
The Manor at Flagler Village |
Apartments |
|
|
150.5 |
|
|
|
91
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Location / Description |
Type |
Fair Value at |
||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
|||||||||||||||
The Residences at the Village of Merrick Park |
Apartments |
|
|
$ |
|
71.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
69.3 |
|||||
Urban Centre |
Office |
|
|
122.3 |
|
|
113.0 |
|||||||||
Weston Business Center |
Industrial |
|
|
88.8 |
|
|
86.6 |
|||||||||
Georgia: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Atlanta Industrial Portfolio |
Industrial |
|
|
58.5 |
|
|
47.3 |
|||||||||
Shawnee Ridge Industrial Portfolio |
Industrial |
|
|
81.4 |
|
|
71.2 |
|||||||||
Illinois: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Chicago Caleast Industrial Portfolio |
Industrial |
|
|
73.1 |
|
|
66.9 |
|||||||||
Chicago Industrial Portfolio |
Industrial |
|
|
84.1 |
|
|
75.9 |
|||||||||
Parkview Plaza |
Office |
|
|
51.2 |
|
|
45.6 |
|||||||||
Maryland: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Landover Logistics Center |
Industrial |
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
35.0 |
|||||||||
The Shops at Wisconsin Place |
Retail |
|
|
103.5 |
|
|
109.9 |
|||||||||
Massachusetts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
99 High Street |
Office |
|
|
506.4 |
|
|
477.2 |
(1) |
|
|||||||
501 Boylston Street |
Office |
|
|
434.3 |
|
|
392.1 |
|||||||||
Northeast RA Industrial Portfolio |
Industrial |
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
35.9 |
|||||||||
Residence at Rivers Edge |
Apartments |
|
|
87.5 |
|
|
84.9 |
|||||||||
New Jersey: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
200 Milik Street |
Industrial |
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
Marketfair |
Retail |
|
|
106.5 |
|
|
99.0 |
|||||||||
Mohawk Distribution Center |
Industrial |
|
|
81.9 |
|
|
81.0 |
|||||||||
South River Road Industrial |
Industrial |
|
|
68.3 |
|
|
65.5 |
|||||||||
New York: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
21 Penn Plaza |
Office |
|
|
270.1 |
|
|
246.6 |
|||||||||
250 North 10th Street |
Apartments |
|
|
171.0 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
425 Park Avenue |
Ground Lease |
|
|
440.0 |
|
|
420.0 |
|||||||||
780 Third Avenue |
Office |
|
|
420.6 |
(1) |
|
|
|
405.4 |
(1) |
|
|||||
837 Washington Street |
Office |
|
|
205.0 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
The Colorado |
Apartments |
|
|
263.6 |
(1) |
|
|
|
215.6 |
(1) |
|
|||||
The Corner |
Apartments |
|
|
265.0 |
(1) |
|
|
|
270.0 |
(1) |
|
|||||
Oregon: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
The Cordelia |
Apartments |
|
|
48.5 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
Pennsylvania: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
1619 Walnut Street |
Retail |
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
22.4 |
|||||||||
The Pepper Building |
Apartments |
|
|
53.2 |
|
|
50.9 |
|||||||||
Tennessee: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Southside at McEwen |
Retail |
|
|
47.6 |
|
|
45.1 |
|||||||||
Summit Distribution Center |
Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
16.9 |
|||||||||
Texas: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Beltway North Commerce Center |
Industrial |
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cliffs at Barton Creek |
Apartments |
|
|
46.4 |
|
|
43.7 |
|||||||||
Dallas Industrial Portfolio |
Industrial |
|
|
193.2 |
|
|
182.7 |
|||||||||
Houston Apartment Portfolio |
Apartments |
|
|
175.5 |
|
|
176.9 |
|||||||||
Lincoln Centre |
Office |
|
|
315.9 |
|
|
317.1 |
(1) |
|
|||||||
Northwest Houston Industrial Portfolio |
Industrial |
|
|
68.8 |
|
|
67.0 |
|||||||||
Park 10 Distribution |
Industrial |
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
13.0 |
|||||||||
Pinnacle Industrial Portfolio |
Industrial |
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
42.4 |
|||||||||
Pinto Business Park |
Industrial |
|
|
93.0 |
|
|
|
92
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Location / Description |
Type |
Fair Value at |
||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
|||||||||||||||
The Caruth |
Apartments |
|
|
$ |
|
81.8 |
(1) |
|
|
|
$ |
|
80.6 |
(1) |
|
|
The Maroneal |
Apartments |
|
|
57.0 |
|
|
56.8 |
|||||||||
Virginia: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
8270 Greensboro Drive |
Office |
|
|
48.1 |
|
|
45.3 |
|||||||||
Ashford Meadows Apartments |
Apartments |
|
|
106.0 |
(1) |
|
|
|
106.0 |
(1) |
|
|||||
Plaza America |
Retail |
|
|
106.0 |
|
|
99.4 |
|||||||||
The Ellipse at Ballston |
Office |
|
|
87.5 |
|
|
86.8 |
|||||||||
The Palatine |
Apartments |
|
|
126.9 |
(1) |
|
|
|
125.6 |
(1) |
|
|||||
Washington: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Circa Green Lake |
Apartments |
|
|
87.9 |
|
|
86.1 |
|||||||||
Fourth and Madison |
Office |
|
|
489.3 |
(1) |
|
|
|
455.0 |
(1) |
|
|||||
Millennium Corporate Park |
Office |
|
|
189.5 |
|
|
175.0 |
|||||||||
Northwest RA Industrial Portfolio |
Industrial |
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
27.1 |
|||||||||
Pacific Corporate Park |
Industrial |
|
|
36.9 |
|
|
37.2 |
|||||||||
Prescott Wallingford Apartments |
Apartments |
|
|
58.0 |
|
|
54.4 |
|||||||||
Rainier Corporate Park |
Industrial |
|
|
96.9 |
|
|
91.3 |
|||||||||
Regal Logistics Campus |
Industrial |
|
|
78.2 |
|
|
71.5 |
|||||||||
Union - South Lake Union |
Apartments |
|
|
105.0 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
Washington DC: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue |
Office |
|
|
805.8 |
(1) |
|
|
|
805.4 |
(1) |
|
|||||
1401 H Street, NW |
Office |
|
|
242.2 |
(1) |
|
|
|
240.3 |
(1) |
|
|||||
1900 K Street, NW |
Office |
|
|
327.3 |
|
|
319.7 |
|||||||||
Mass Court |
Apartments |
|
|
169.1 |
(1) |
|
|
|
172.2 |
(1) |
|
|||||
Mazza Gallerie |
Retail |
|
|
92.8 |
|
|
88.8 |
|||||||||
The Ashton |
Apartments |
|
|
41.2 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
The Louis at 14th |
Apartments |
|
|
182.6 |
|
|
182.5 |
|||||||||
The Woodley |
Apartments |
|
|
203.3 |
|
|
199.0 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
TOTAL REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
(Cost $12,289.0 and $11,309.0) |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
14,606.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
13,139.0 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURES AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS17.5% and 15.2%
REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURES16.9% and 13.6% (Note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Location / Description |
Type |
Fair Value at |
||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
|||||||||||||||
California: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
CAColorado Center LP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Colorado Center (50% Account Interest) |
Office |
|
|
$ |
|
559.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
368.1 |
(2) |
|
|||
T-C 1500 Owens, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
1500 Owens Street (49.9% Account Interest) |
Office |
|
|
73.5 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
T-C Foundry Square II Venture LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Foundry Square II (50.1% Account Interest) |
Office |
|
|
189.6 |
(2) |
|
|
|
158.0 |
(2) |
|
|||||
T-C Illinois Street, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
409-499 Illinois Street (40% Account Interest) |
Office |
|
|
190.8 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
Valencia Town Center Associates LP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Valencia Town Center (50% Account Interest) |
Retail |
|
|
120.5 |
(2) |
|
|
|
114.3 |
(2) |
|
|||||
Florida: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Florida Mall Associates, Ltd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
The Florida Mall (50% Account Interest) |
Retail |
|
|
644.5 |
(2) |
|
|
|
533.6 |
(2) |
|
|||||
TREA Florida Retail, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Florida Retail Portfolio (80% Account Interest) |
Retail |
|
|
136.5 |
|
|
140.1 |
|||||||||
West Dade County Associates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Miami International Mall (50% Account Interest) |
Retail |
|
|
134.1 |
(2) |
|
|
|
119.6 |
(2) |
|
|||||
Maryland: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
WP Project Developer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
The Shops at Wisconsin Place (33.33% Account Interest) |
Retail |
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
15.1 |
|||||||||
Massachusetts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
One Boston Place REIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
One Boston Place (50.25% Account Interest) |
Office |
|
|
204.3 |
|
|
208.6 |
|||||||||
T-C 225 Binney, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
225 Binney Street (70% Account Interest) |
Office |
|
|
192.9 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
New York: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
401 West 14th Street, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
401 West 14th Street (42.2% Account Interest) |
Retail |
|
|
38.9 |
(2) |
|
|
|
35.3 |
(2) |
|
|||||
RGM 42, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
MiMA (70% Account Interest) |
Apartments |
|
|
199.0 |
(2,10) |
|
|
|
305.2 |
(2) |
|
|||||
Tennessee: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
West Town Mall, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
West Town Mall (50% Account Interest) |
Retail |
|
|
128.2 |
(2) |
|
|
|
94.6 |
(2) |
|
|||||
Texas: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Four Oaks Venture LP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Four Oaks Place LP (51% Account Interest) |
Office |
|
|
379.5 |
(2) |
|
|
|
365.8 |
(2) |
|
|||||
Washington: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
T-C REA 400 Fairview Investor, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
400 Fairview (90% Account Interest) |
Office |
|
|
235.5 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
Various: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
DDRTC Core Retail Fund, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
DDR Joint Venture (85% Account Interest) |
Retail |
|
|
488.8 |
(2,3) |
|
|
|
448.4 |
(2,3) |
|
|||||
Storage Portfolio I, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Storage Portfolio (75% Account Interest) |
Storage |
|
|
132.9 |
(2,3) |
|
|
|
114.8 |
(2,3) |
|
94
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Location / Description |
Type |
Fair Value at |
||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
|||||||||||||||
Strategic Ind Portfolio I, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
IDI Nationwide Industrial Portfolio (60% Account Interest) |
Industrial |
|
|
$ |
|
|
(3,5) |
|
|
|
$ |
|
0.6 |
(3,5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
TOTAL REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
(Cost $3,032.3 and $2,361.4) |
|
|
|
|
4,068.4 |
|
|
3,022.1 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS0.6% and 1.6% (Note 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Clarion Gables Multi-Family Trust LP (8.350% Account Interest) |
|
|
|
|
112.9 |
|
|
|
||||||||
Cobalt Industrial REIT (10.998% Account Interest) |
|
|
|
|
|
(8) |
|
|
|
1.1 |
||||||
Colony Realty Partners LP (5.27% Account Interest) |
|
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
21.1 |
||||||||
Heitman Value Partners Fund (8.43% Account Interest) |
|
|
|
|
|
(9) |
|
|
|
0.3 |
||||||
Lion Gables Apartment Fund (18.46% Account Interest) |
|
|
|
|
|
(6) |
|
|
|
314.1 |
||||||
Transwestern Mezz Realty Partners III, LLC (11.708% Account Interest) |
|
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
20.9 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
TOTAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
(Cost $139.1 and $222.1) |
|
|
|
|
144.8 |
|
|
357.5 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
TOTAL REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURES AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
(Cost $3,171.4 and $2,583.5) |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
4,213.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
3,379.6 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
MARKETABLE SECURITIES21.6% and 25.5%
REAL ESTATE-RELATED MARKETABLE SECURITIES4.2% and 8.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Shares |
Issuer |
Fair Value at |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
74,537 |
|
|
128,562 |
Acadia Realty Trust |
|
|
$ |
|
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
4.1 |
|||||||||||||
|
18,734 |
|
|
31,670 |
Agree Realty Corporation |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
1.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
2,183 |
|
|
4,549 |
Alexanders, Inc. |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
2.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
78,684 |
|
|
132,373 |
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
11.7 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
41,950 |
|
|
55,491 |
American Assets Trust, Inc. |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
2.2 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
122,225 |
|
|
232,629 |
American Campus Communities, Inc. |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
9.6 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
6,347 |
|
|
|
American Farmland Company |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
163,619 |
|
|
331,090 |
American Homes 4 Rent |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
5.6 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
35,204 |
|
|
40,280 |
American Residential Properties |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
0.7 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
458,181 |
|
|
851,739 |
American Tower Corp. |
|
|
44.4 |
|
|
84.2 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
170,490 |
|
|
324,603 |
Apartment Investment and Management Company |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
12.1 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
181,776 |
|
|
|
Apple Hospitality Inc. |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
34,711 |
|
|
45,930 |
Armada Hoffler Properties Inc. |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
0.4 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
29,357 |
|
|
40,976 |
Ashford Hospitality Prime Inc. |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
0.7 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
100,517 |
|
|
228,348 |
Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
2.4 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
131,435 |
Associated Estates Realty Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
148,389 |
|
|
285,499 |
Avalonbay Communities, Inc. |
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
46.6 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
82,002 |
Aviv REIT, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
222,345 |
|
|
427,097 |
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
9.2 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
20,504 |
|
|
|
Bluerock Residential Growth, Inc. |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
166,324 |
|
|
314,607 |
Boston Properties, Inc. |
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
40.5 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
195,470 |
|
|
398,099 |
Brandywine Realty Trust |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
6.4 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
190,718 |
|
|
238,279 |
Brixmore Porperty Group Inc |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
5.9 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
94,156 |
|
|
188,626 |
Camden Property Trust |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
13.9 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
70,056 |
|
|
258,814 |
Campus Crest Communities, Inc. |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
1.9 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
89,888 |
|
|
|
Care Capital Properties, Inc. |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
55,061 |
|
|
|
CareTrust REIT Inc. |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
46,704 |
|
|
69,250 |
Catchmark Timber Trust, Inc. |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
0.8 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
185,704 |
|
|
335,345 |
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
6.5 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
92,124 |
|
|
177,495 |
Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
1.3 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
417,369 |
Chambers Street Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
40,150 |
|
|
73,127 |
Chatham Lodging Trust |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
2.1 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
64,801 |
|
|
121,692 |
Chesapeake Lodging Trust |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
4.5 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
135,599 |
|
|
277,710 |
Columbia Property Trust Inc |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
7.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
136,492 |
|
|
|
Communication Sales & Leasing, Inc. |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
7,031 |
|
|
|
Community Healthcare Trust, Inc. |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
12,695 |
|
|
70,620 |
Corenergy Infrastructure Trust, Inc. |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
0.5 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
33,372 |
|
|
48,733 |
CoreSite Realty Corporation |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
1.9 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
103,186 |
|
|
150,486 |
Corporate Office Properties Trust |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
4.3 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
122,465 |
|
|
247,990 |
Corrections Corporation of America |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
9.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
231,292 |
|
|
589,552 |
Cousins Properties Incorporated |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
6.7 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
362,207 |
|
|
728,325 |
Crown Castle International Corporation |
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
57.3 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
184,709 |
|
|
410,111 |
Cubesmart |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
9.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
64,520 |
|
|
78,620 |
CyrusOne Inc |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
2.2 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
96,068 |
|
|
184,830 |
DCT Industrial Trust, Inc. |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
6.6 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
333,126 |
|
|
806,645 |
DDR Corp |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
14.8 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
219,413 |
|
|
440,687 |
DiamondRock Hospitality Company |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
6.6 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
147,536 |
|
|
301,192 |
Digital Realty Trust, Inc. |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
20.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
147,977 |
|
|
295,214 |
Douglas Emmett, Inc. |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
8.4 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
376,363 |
|
|
756,115 |
Duke Realty Corporation |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
15.3 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
71,557 |
|
|
111,572 |
DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc. |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
3.7 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
14,727 |
|
|
|
Easterly Government Properties, Inc. |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
34,861 |
|
|
46,023 |
EastGroup Properties, Inc. |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
2.9 |
96
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Shares |
Issuer |
Fair Value at |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
60,392 |
|
|
79,160 |
Education Realty Trust, Inc. |
|
|
$ |
|
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
2.9 |
|||||||||||||
|
99,527 |
|
|
223,187 |
Empire State Realty Trust |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
3.9 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
64,743 |
|
|
72,480 |
EPR Properties |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
4.2 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
66,786 |
|
|
|
Equinix Inc. |
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
136,984 |
|
|
285,705 |
Equity Commonwealth |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
7.3 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
83,026 |
|
|
147,548 |
Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc. |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
7.6 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
85,201 |
|
|
190,245 |
Equity One, Inc. |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
4.8 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
390,695 |
|
|
764,996 |
Equity Residential |
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
55.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
71,115 |
|
|
136,082 |
Essex Property Trust, Inc. |
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
28.1 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
131,275 |
Excel Trust, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
125,053 |
|
|
242,082 |
Extra Space Storage, Inc. |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
14.2 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
74,751 |
|
|
142,140 |
Federal Realty Investment Trust |
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
19.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
157,554 |
|
|
284,615 |
FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
3.1 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
119,778 |
|
|
295,495 |
First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
6.1 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
68,780 |
|
|
133,251 |
First Potomac Realty Trust |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
1.6 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
98,453 |
|
|
198,119 |
Franklin Street Properties Corp. |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
2.4 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
95,044 |
|
|
241,051 |
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
7.1 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
546,334 |
|
|
1,116,547 |
General Growth Properties, Inc. |
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
31.4 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
77,601 |
|
|
156,310 |
GEO Group Inc/The |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
6.3 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
26,214 |
|
|
60,598 |
Getty Realty Corp. |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
1.1 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
23,254 |
|
|
34,020 |
Gladstone Commercial Corporation |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.6 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
326,692 |
Glimcher Realty Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
76,778 |
|
|
200,061 |
Government Properties Income Trust |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
4.6 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
451,331 |
|
|
403,115 |
Gramercy Property Trust Inc |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
2.8 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
504,269 |
|
|
951,260 |
HCP, Inc. |
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
41.9 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
734,406 |
Health Care REIT, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
55.6 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
109,418 |
|
|
211,892 |
Healthcare Realty Trust Inc. |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
5.8 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
137,819 |
|
|
263,910 |
Healthcare Trust of America |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
7.1 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
44,636 |
|
|
386,553 |
Hersha Hospitality Trust |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
2.7 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
102,464 |
|
|
219,746 |
Highwoods Properties, Inc. |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
9.7 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
107,460 |
Home Properties, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
165,124 |
|
|
332,850 |
Hospitality Properties Trust |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
10.3 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
825,304 |
|
|
1,641,705 |
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. |
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
39.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
79,867 |
|
|
123,652 |
Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
3.7 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
32,461 |
|
|
|
Independence Realty Trust, Inc. |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
94,370 |
|
|
190,919 |
Inland Real Estate Corp. |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
2.1 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
136,573 |
|
|
241,151 |
Investors Real Estate Trust |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
2.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
201,089 |
|
|
298,480 |
Iron Mountain Inc. |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
11.5 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
1,500,000 |
iShares Dow Jones US Real Estate Index Fund |
|
|
112.7 |
|
|
115.3 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
100,594 |
|
|
183,003 |
Kilroy Realty Corporation |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
12.6 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
448,463 |
|
|
911,057 |
Kimco Realty Corporation |
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
22.9 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
89,244 |
|
|
254,398 |
Kite Realty Group Trust |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
7.3 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
89,664 |
|
|
|
Lamar Advertising Corporation |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
123,151 |
|
|
259,799 |
LaSalle Hotel Properties |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
10.5 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
256,516 |
|
|
508,105 |
Lexington Realty Trust |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
5.6 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
162,768 |
|
|
328,620 |
Liberty Property Trust |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
12.4 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
38,232 |
|
|
58,133 |
LTC Properties, Inc. |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
2.5 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
97,182 |
|
|
142,118 |
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
2.7 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
255,456 |
|
|
385,417 |
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
5.3 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
81,978 |
|
|
177,150 |
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
13.2 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
61,924 |
|
|
118,597 |
Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
1.3 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
184,354 |
|
|
|
Monogram Residential Trust Inc. |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
37,511 |
|
|
65,594 |
National Health Investors, Inc. |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
4.6 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
146,133 |
|
|
305,461 |
National Retail Properties, Inc. |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
12.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
24,977 |
|
|
|
National Storage Affiliates Trust |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
87,273 |
|
|
237,208 |
New Senior Investment Group |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
3.9 |
97
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Shares |
Issuer |
Fair Value at |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
177,920 |
|
|
|
New York REIT |
|
|
$ |
|
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
18,365 |
|
|
|
Nexpoint Residential Trust, Inc. |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
72,837 |
|
|
|
NorthStar Realty Europe Corp. |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
189,319 |
|
|
570,000 |
Northstar Realty Finance Corp. |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
10.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
178,475 |
|
|
281,073 |
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
11.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
11,794 |
|
|
28,607 |
One Liberty Properties, Inc. |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.7 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
148,839 |
|
|
|
Outfront Media Inc. |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
156,333 |
|
|
|
Paramount Group Inc. |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
86,954 |
|
|
256,813 |
Parkway Properties, Inc. |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
4.7 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
78,371 |
|
|
179,213 |
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
8.2 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
72,024 |
|
|
147,065 |
Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
3.5 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
95,326 |
|
|
168,375 |
Physicians Realty Trust |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
2.8 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
157,777 |
|
|
271,204 |
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
5.1 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
190,702 |
|
|
393,917 |
Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
16.9 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
58,985 |
|
|
119,803 |
Post Properties, Inc. |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
7.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
40,691 |
|
|
84,078 |
Potlatch Corporation |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
3.5 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
23,945 |
|
|
|
Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc. |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
568,315 |
|
|
1,129,782 |
ProLogis |
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
48.6 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
21,667 |
|
|
44,040 |
PS Business Parks, Inc. |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
3.5 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
157,211 |
|
|
304,858 |
Public Storage, Inc. |
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
56.4 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
41,960 |
|
|
10,813 |
QTS Realty Trust, Inc. |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
0.4 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
84,869 |
|
|
168,010 |
Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
3.1 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
137,264 |
|
|
345,772 |
Rayonier, Inc. |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
9.7 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
270,636 |
|
|
517,842 |
Realty Income Corporation |
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
24.7 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
101,582 |
|
|
202,908 |
Regency Centers Corporation |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
12.9 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
106,928 |
|
|
197,186 |
Retail Opportunity Investment |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
3.3 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
257,274 |
|
|
520,915 |
Retail Properties of America |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
8.7 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
59,147 |
|
|
90,510 |
Rexford Industrial Realty Inc |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
1.4 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
136,460 |
|
|
220,006 |
RLJ Lodging Trust |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
7.4 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
39,799 |
|
|
83,313 |
Rouse Properties, Inc. |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
1.5 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
53,069 |
|
|
108,370 |
Ryman Hospitality Properties |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
5.7 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
74,407 |
|
|
118,843 |
Sabra Health Care REIT Inc |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
3.6 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
15,057 |
|
|
28,976 |
Saul Centers, Inc. |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
1.7 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
73,541 |
|
|
83,490 |
Select Income Real Estate Investment Trust |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
2.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
259,057 |
|
|
499,658 |
Senior Housing Properties Trust |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
11.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
36,820 |
|
|
82,090 |
Silver Bay Realty Trust Corp |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
1.4 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
336,974 |
|
|
674,617 |
Simon Property Group, Inc. |
|
|
65.5 |
|
|
122.9 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
108,594 |
|
|
189,478 |
SL Green Realty Corp. |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
22.6 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
38,958 |
|
|
53,568 |
Sovran Self Storage, Inc. |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
4.7 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
459,110 |
|
|
1,080,553 |
Spirit Realty Capital Inc. |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
12.8 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
73,832 |
|
|
200,698 |
Stag Industrial, Inc. |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
4.9 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
41,562 |
|
|
89,340 |
Starwood Waypoint Residential Trust |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
2.4 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
70,283 |
|
|
|
STORE Capital Corporation |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
641,315 |
Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
8.5 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
91,828 |
|
|
186,578 |
Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
2.3 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
60,628 |
|
|
100,386 |
Sun Communities, Inc. |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
6.1 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
228,054 |
|
|
511,462 |
Sunstone Hotel Investors, L.L.C. |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
8.4 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
104,353 |
|
|
212,284 |
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
7.8 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
65,358 |
|
|
120,329 |
Taubman Centers, Inc. |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
9.2 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
46,459 |
|
|
70,574 |
Terreno Realty Corporation |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
1.5 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
171,305 |
|
|
336,472 |
The Macerich Company |
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
28.1 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
52,125 |
|
|
|
Tier Inc. |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
285,672 |
|
|
556,651 |
UDR, Inc. |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
17.2 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
26,623 |
|
|
44,774 |
UMH Properties, Inc. |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.4 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
14,263 |
|
|
29,158 |
Universal Health Realty Income Trust |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
1.4 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
97,203 |
|
|
|
Urban Edge Properties |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
98
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Shares |
Issuer |
Fair Value at |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
28,041 |
|
|
51,473 |
Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc. |
|
|
$ |
|
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
1.1 |
|||||||||||||
|
358,667 |
|
|
652,228 |
Ventas, Inc. |
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
46.8 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
985,845 |
|
|
|
VEREIT, Inc. |
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
183,731 |
|
|
351,441 |
Vornado Realty Trust |
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
41.4 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
349,878 |
Washington Prime Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
73,550 |
|
|
96,831 |
Washington Real Estate Investment Trust |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
2.7 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
121,612 |
|
|
190,047 |
Weingarten Realty Investors |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
6.6 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
380,157 |
|
|
|
Welltower Inc. |
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
553,851 |
|
|
1,119,582 |
Weyerhaeuser Company |
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
40.2 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
27,622 |
|
|
50,900 |
Whitestone Real Estate Investment Trust B |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.8 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
39,142 |
|
|
75,457 |
Winthrop Realty Trust |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
1.2 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
95,448 |
|
|
246,629 |
WP Carey Inc. |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
17.3 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
200,141 |
|
|
|
WP Glimcher Inc. |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
121,567 |
|
|
|
Xenia Hotels & Resorts Inc |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL REAL ESTATE-RELATED MARKETABLE SECURITIES |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Cost $859.5 and $1,400.2) |
|
|
$ |
|
1,024.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
1,818.4 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
OTHER MARKETABLE SECURITIES17.4% and 17.3%
GOVERNMENT AGENCY NOTES11.0% and 10.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal |
Issuer |
Yield(4) |
Maturity Date |
Fair Value at |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
44.0 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.094%-0.101% |
|
|
1/14/2015 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
44.0 |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
15.0 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.046% |
|
|
1/15/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
15.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
21.9 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.046%-0.071% |
|
|
1/20/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
21.8 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
10.0 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.051% |
|
|
1/28/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
40.9 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.068%-0.101% |
|
|
2/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
40.9 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
46.1 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.101% |
|
|
2/17/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
46.1 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
35.6 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.089% |
|
|
2/25/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
35.6 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
12.0 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.076% |
|
|
2/27/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
12.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
39.0 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.101% |
|
|
3/2/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
39.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
37.1 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.091% |
|
|
3/3/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
37.1 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
44.6 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.086% |
|
|
3/16/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
44.6 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
38.0 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.066% |
|
|
3/18/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
38.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
35.0 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.061% |
|
|
3/25/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
35.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
40.0 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.066% |
|
|
4/1/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
40.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
26.7 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.096% |
|
|
4/6/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
26.7 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
44.7 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.096%-0.112% |
|
|
4/8/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
44.7 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
28.3 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.096% |
|
|
4/13/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
28.3 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
35.7 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.101%-0.152% |
|
|
4/27/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
35.7 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
17.5 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.101% |
|
|
4/29/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
17.5 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
30.0 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.081% |
|
|
5/1/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
30.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
11.5 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.107% |
|
|
5/4/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.5 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
25.0 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.101% |
|
|
5/6/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
25.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
20.0 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.112% |
|
|
5/13/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
20.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.127% |
|
|
5/20/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
35.0 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.091% |
|
|
6/17/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
35.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
25.0 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.144% |
|
|
7/1/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
25.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.112% |
|
|
7/20/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
99.9 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.137% |
|
|
8/17/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.162% |
|
|
1/4/2016 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.213% |
|
|
1/5/2016 |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.218% |
|
|
1/12/2016 |
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.223% |
|
|
1/19/2016 |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.225% |
|
|
1/20/2016 |
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.223% |
|
|
1/27/2016 |
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.274% |
|
|
2/2/2016 |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.244% |
|
|
2/3/2016 |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.345% |
|
|
2/8/2016 |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.132%-0.172% |
|
|
2/10/2016 |
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.300% |
|
|
3/2/2016 |
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.275%-0.305% |
|
|
3/9/2016 |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.203% |
|
|
3/14/2016 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.213% |
|
|
3/16/2016 |
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.162% |
|
|
3/17/2016 |
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.213% |
|
|
3/30/2016 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.183% |
|
|
4/4/2016 |
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
100
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal |
Issuer |
Yield(4) |
Maturity Date |
Fair Value at |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ |
|
10.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.178% |
|
|
4/5/2016 |
|
|
$ |
|
10.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.215% |
|
|
4/6/2016 |
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.193% |
|
|
4/11/2016 |
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.188% |
|
|
4/12/2016 |
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.310% |
|
|
4/18/2016 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.233% |
|
|
4/19/2016 |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
25.3 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.325%-0.340% |
|
|
4/27/2016 |
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.366% |
|
|
5/4/2016 |
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.371% |
|
|
5/18/2016 |
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Discount Notes |
0.417% |
|
|
5/25/2016 |
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
Federal Farm Credit Bank Discount Notes |
0.091% |
|
|
5/21/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
Federal Farm Credit Bank Discount Notes |
0.254% |
|
|
2/9/2016 |
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
46.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Farm Credit Bank Discount Notes |
0.162% |
|
|
3/10/2016 |
|
|
46.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
Federal Farm Credit Bank Discount Notes |
0.549% |
|
|
6/10/2016 |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Farm Credit Bank Discount Notes |
0.315% |
|
|
7/27/2016 |
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
20.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.041% |
|
|
1/5/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
20.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
19.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.047% |
|
|
1/7/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
19.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.093% |
|
|
1/9/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
40.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.076% |
|
|
1/13/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
40.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
30.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.025% |
|
|
1/16/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
30.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.061% |
|
|
1/21/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
21.8 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.101% |
|
|
1/23/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
21.7 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.086% |
|
|
1/27/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.071% |
|
|
1/28/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.061% |
|
|
1/30/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
58.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.074% |
|
|
2/4/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
58.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
45.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.101% |
|
|
2/6/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
45.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
56.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.101% |
|
|
2/13/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
56.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
29.5 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.096% |
|
|
2/20/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
29.5 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
20.6 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.107% |
|
|
2/23/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
20.6 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
22.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.094% |
|
|
3/4/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
22.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
16.7 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.112% |
|
|
3/6/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
16.7 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
11.5 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.073% |
|
|
3/9/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.5 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
31.3 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.112% |
|
|
3/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
31.3 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.071% |
|
|
3/17/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
27.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.067% |
|
|
3/27/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
27.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
15.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.096%-0.122% |
|
|
3/30/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
15.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
29.2 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.101% |
|
|
4/17/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
29.2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.101% |
|
|
4/24/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
30.1 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.152% |
|
|
4/29/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
30.1 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
20.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.116% |
|
|
5/20/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
20.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
20.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.142% |
|
|
7/30/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
20.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
20.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.162% |
|
|
8/20/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
20.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
8.2 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.091%-0.162% |
|
|
8/21/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
48.8 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.152% |
|
|
8/28/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
48.8 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
20.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.168% |
|
|
9/4/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
20.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
21.5 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.162% |
|
|
9/8/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
21.5 |
101
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal |
Issuer |
Yield(4) |
Maturity Date |
Fair Value at |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
14.0 |
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.142%-0.162% |
|
|
9/9/2015 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
14.0 |
||||||||||||||
|
21.9 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.167%-0.193% |
|
|
1/4/2016 |
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.112% |
|
|
1/6/2016 |
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
47.1 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.101%-0.183% |
|
|
1/8/2016 |
|
|
47.1 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.233% |
|
|
1/11/2016 |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.233% |
|
|
1/12/2016 |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.112%-0.162% |
|
|
1/13/2016 |
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.112%-0.254% |
|
|
1/15/2016 |
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.254% |
|
|
1/19/2016 |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.112%-0.274% |
|
|
1/20/2016 |
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.112% |
|
|
1/22/2016 |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.152%-0.284% |
|
|
1/26/2016 |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.249% |
|
|
2/1/2016 |
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.112% |
|
|
2/2/2016 |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
39.2 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.132%-0.157% |
|
|
2/3/2016 |
|
|
39.1 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.193% |
|
|
2/5/2016 |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
52.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.193%-0.203% |
|
|
2/8/2016 |
|
|
52.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.132% |
|
|
2/12/2016 |
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
65.1 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.203%-0.406% |
|
|
2/16/2016 |
|
|
65.1 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.274% |
|
|
2/19/2016 |
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.152% |
|
|
2/22/2016 |
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.132% |
|
|
2/23/2016 |
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.264%-0.325% |
|
|
2/24/2016 |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.142% |
|
|
2/26/2016 |
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.304% |
|
|
3/1/2016 |
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.172% |
|
|
3/8/2016 |
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
73.8 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.325%-0.360% |
|
|
3/14/2016 |
|
|
73.8 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.172% |
|
|
3/15/2016 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.188% |
|
|
3/21/2016 |
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.193% |
|
|
3/23/2016 |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
44.5 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.508% |
|
|
3/28/2016 |
|
|
44.4 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.249%-0.254% |
|
|
3/30/2016 |
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
24.2 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.213% |
|
|
4/1/2016 |
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.335% |
|
|
4/8/2016 |
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.508% |
|
|
4/11/2016 |
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
44.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.284%-0.508% |
|
|
4/13/2016 |
|
|
43.9 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
49.1 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.239%-0.244% |
|
|
4/15/2016 |
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
54.5 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.246%-0.345% |
|
|
4/20/2016 |
|
|
54.4 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.254% |
|
|
4/22/2016 |
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.325% |
|
|
4/27/2016 |
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.610% |
|
|
6/8/2016 |
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Discount Notes |
0.274% |
|
|
6/13/2016 |
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.081%-0.096% |
|
|
1/8/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
43.0 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.038%-0.091% |
|
|
1/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
43.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
30.8 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.101% |
|
|
1/26/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
30.8 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
37.0 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.061% |
|
|
1/29/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
37.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
16.5 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.096%-0.107% |
|
|
2/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
16.5 |
102
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal |
Issuer |
Yield(4) |
Maturity Date |
Fair Value at |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
22.9 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.080%-0.094% |
|
|
3/16/2015 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
22.9 |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
11.8 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.112% |
|
|
3/17/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.8 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
17.1 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.081%-0.107% |
|
|
3/19/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
17.1 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
19.6 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.061% |
|
|
3/24/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
19.5 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
18.0 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.132% |
|
|
3/25/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
18.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
16.2 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.122% |
|
|
4/1/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
16.2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
27.2 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.127%-0.142% |
|
|
4/2/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
27.2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
20.9 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.066% |
|
|
4/6/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
20.9 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
16.2 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.096%-0.142% |
|
|
4/7/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
16.2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.096% |
|
|
4/9/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
29.8 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.101% |
|
|
4/14/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
29.8 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
13.6 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.096% |
|
|
4/16/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
13.6 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
11.0 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.107% |
|
|
4/21/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
15.0 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.096% |
|
|
4/22/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
15.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
20.0 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.096% |
|
|
4/23/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
20.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
13.7 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.101% |
|
|
4/24/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
13.7 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
20.0 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.101% |
|
|
5/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
20.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
8.8 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.112% |
|
|
5/27/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.8 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
41.0 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.147% |
|
|
6/15/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
41.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
15.0 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.137% |
|
|
6/16/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
15.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
6.9 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.101% |
|
|
7/21/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.9 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
24.0 |
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.159% |
|
|
7/22/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
24.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.213%-0.223% |
|
|
1/6/2016 |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.218%-0.233% |
|
|
1/22/2016 |
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.244% |
|
|
1/25/2016 |
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.244% |
|
|
1/28/2016 |
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.233% |
|
|
1/29/2016 |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
43.8 |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.152%-0.183% |
|
|
2/5/2016 |
|
|
43.8 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.132%-0.183% |
|
|
2/17/2016 |
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
36.5 |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.137% |
|
|
2/19/2016 |
|
|
36.5 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.167% |
|
|
2/26/2016 |
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
75.0 |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.142%-0.183% |
|
|
3/4/2016 |
|
|
75.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.142% |
|
|
3/7/2016 |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
27.0 |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.233% |
|
|
3/11/2016 |
|
|
27.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.162% |
|
|
3/18/2016 |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.437% |
|
|
4/1/2016 |
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.203% |
|
|
4/4/2016 |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.355% |
|
|
4/26/2016 |
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.381% |
|
|
5/2/2016 |
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.467% |
|
|
5/6/2016 |
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
34.0 |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Discount Notes |
0.401% |
|
|
5/9/2016 |
|
|
33.9 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY NOTES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Cost $2,667.0 and $2,369.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,666.8 |
|
|
|
|
2,369.9 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UNITED STATES TREASURY SECURITIES6.4% and 6.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.0 |
United States Treasury Bills |
0.041% |
|
|
1/2/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.0 |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
United States Treasury Bills |
0.035% |
|
|
1/15/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
103
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal |
Issuer |
Yield(4) |
Maturity Date |
Fair Value at |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
45.8 |
United States Treasury Bills |
0.020%-0.040% |
|
|
1/22/2015 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
45.8 |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
19.4 |
United States Treasury Bills |
0.038%-0.051% |
|
|
2/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
19.4 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
30.0 |
United States Treasury Bills |
0.044% |
|
|
2/19/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
30.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
17.2 |
United States Treasury Bills |
0.020%-0.030% |
|
|
2/26/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
17.2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
43.6 |
United States Treasury Bills |
0.020%-0.032% |
|
|
3/5/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
43.6 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
30.0 |
United States Treasury Bills |
0.042% |
|
|
3/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
30.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
16.0 |
United States Treasury Bills |
0.030% |
|
|
3/26/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
16.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
United States Treasury Bills |
0.028%-0.044% |
|
|
4/2/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
36.6 |
United States Treasury Bills |
0.037% |
|
|
4/9/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
36.6 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
41.2 |
United States Treasury Bills |
0.056%-0.057% |
|
|
5/7/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
41.2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
53.9 |
United States Treasury Bills |
0.044%-0.071% |
|
|
5/28/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
53.9 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
8.5 |
United States Treasury Bills |
0.076% |
|
|
6/4/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
196.0 |
United States Treasury Bills |
0.071%-0.100% |
|
|
6/25/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
195.9 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
121.0 |
United States Treasury Bills |
0.105%-0.112% |
|
|
7/23/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
120.9 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
35.0 |
United States Treasury Bills |
0.092%-0.178% |
|
|
8/20/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
35.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
United States Treasury Bills |
0.078% |
|
|
9/17/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
49.9 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
117.0 |
United States Treasury Bills |
0.099%-0.101% |
|
|
10/15/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
116.8 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
48.1 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills |
0.162%-0.190% |
|
|
1/7/2016 |
|
|
48.1 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills |
0.112% |
|
|
1/14/2016 |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
115.0 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills |
0.127%-0.172% |
|
|
1/21/2016 |
|
|
115.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
110.0 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills |
0.224%-0.226% |
|
|
2/4/2016 |
|
|
110.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
85.0 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills |
0.178%-0.183% |
|
|
2/18/2016 |
|
|
85.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
69.1 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills |
0.164%-0.214% |
|
|
2/25/2016 |
|
|
69.1 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills |
0.142%-0.178% |
|
|
3/3/2016 |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills |
0.160% |
|
|
3/24/2016 |
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills |
0.190% |
|
|
4/14/2016 |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills |
0.122% |
|
|
4/21/2016 |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills |
0.412% |
|
|
5/5/2016 |
|
|
99.9 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills |
0.392% |
|
|
5/26/2016 |
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
83.0 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills |
0.467%-0.534% |
|
|
6/23/2016 |
|
|
82.8 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills |
0.162% |
|
|
7/21/2016 |
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Bills |
0.196% |
|
|
8/18/2016 |
|
|
49.8 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
United States Treasury Notes |
0.107% |
|
|
1/15/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
24.0 |
United States Treasury Notes |
0.066% |
|
|
4/15/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
24.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
United States Treasury Notes |
0.051% |
|
|
4/23/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
40.0 |
United States Treasury Notes |
0.045% |
|
|
4/30/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
40.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
41.3 |
United States Treasury Notes |
0.061%-0.062% |
|
|
5/14/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
41.3 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
United States Treasury Notes |
0.118% |
|
|
5/15/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
United States Treasury Notes |
0.063% |
|
|
5/21/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
19.6 |
United States Treasury Notes |
0.080% |
|
|
6/15/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
19.6 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
30.0 |
United States Treasury Notes |
0.152% |
|
|
6/30/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
30.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
United States Treasury Notes |
0.130%-0.133% |
|
|
7/15/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
24.0 |
United States Treasury Notes |
0.163% |
|
|
7/31/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
24.2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
26.0 |
United States Treasury Notes |
0.097% |
|
|
7/31/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
26.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
United States Treasury Notes |
0.100%-0.107% |
|
|
8/31/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
50.1 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
United States Treasury Notes |
0.118% |
|
|
9/15/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
United States Treasury Notes |
0.181% |
|
|
9/30/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
104
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
(Dollar values shown in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal |
Issuer |
Yield(4) |
Maturity Date |
Fair Value at |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ |
|
11.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
United States Treasury Notes |
0.104% |
|
|
1/15/2016 |
|
|
$ |
|
11.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
47.0 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Notes |
0.226% |
|
|
2/11/2016 |
|
|
47.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Notes |
0.176%-0.223% |
|
|
2/29/2016 |
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Notes |
0.149%-0.168% |
|
|
3/15/2016 |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Notes |
0.207% |
|
|
3/31/2016 |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
92.0 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Notes |
0.192%-0.243% |
|
|
4/15/2016 |
|
|
91.9 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Notes |
0.381% |
|
|
5/31/2016 |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
46.4 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Notes |
0.498% |
|
|
6/15/2016 |
|
|
46.4 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Notes |
0.494% |
|
|
6/30/2016 |
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Notes |
0.280% |
|
|
7/15/2016 |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
United States Treasury Notes |
0.360%-0.369% |
|
|
8/15/2016 |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL UNITED STATES TREASURY SECURITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Cost $1,540.7 and $1,461.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,540.4 |
|
|
1,461.2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL OTHER MARKETABLE SECURITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Cost $4,207.7 and $3,831.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,207.2 |
|
|
3,831.1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL MARKETABLE SECURITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Cost $5,067.2 and $5,231.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,231.6 |
|
|
5,649.5 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LOAN RECEIVABLE0.4% and 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Borrower |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Charles River Plaza North |
6.080%(7) |
|
|
4/6/2029 |
|
|
100.6 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL LOAN RECEIVABLE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Cost $100.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.6 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Cost $20,627.6 and $19,123.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
24,151.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
22,168.1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The investment has a mortgage loan payable outstanding, as indicated in Note 8. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) |
The fair value reflects the Accounts interest in the joint venture and is net of debt. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) |
Properties within this investment are located throughout the United States. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) |
Yield represents the annualized yield. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(5) |
The joint venture has not officially been dissolved as of December 31, 2015. The property investment held within the joint venture was sold during the quarter ended December 31, 2012. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(6) |
The assets held in this investment were liquidated on February 18, 2015; the investment is currently in dissolution. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(7) |
Represents the fixed interest rate on this investment. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(8) |
The limited partnership was dissolved December 31, 2015. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(9) |
The limited partnership was dissolved December 15, 2015. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(10) |
A partial disposition of assets and a related mortgage payable held by the joint venture was completed on December 21, 2015. |
105
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Participants of the TIAA Real Estate Account and the Board of Trustees of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated statements of assets and liabilities, including the consolidated schedules of investments, and the related consolidated statements of operations, of changes in net assets and of cash flows, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the TIAA Real Estate Account and its subsidiaries (the Account) at December 31, 2015 and 2014, the results of their operations, the changes in their net assets and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Accounts management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
March 10, 2016
106
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
Not applicable.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a) The registrant maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the registrants reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the registrants Principal Executive Officer (PEO) and the Principal Financial Officer (PFO), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Under the supervision and participation of the registrants management, including the registrants PEO and PFO, the registrant conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of December 31, 2015. Based upon managements review, the PEO and the PFO concluded that the registrants disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2015.
(b) Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Account. The Accounts internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Accounts PEO and PFO to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Accounts consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management has made a comprehensive review, evaluation, and assessment of the Accounts internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015. In making its assessment of internal control over financial reporting, management used the criteria issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 Framework). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that as of December 31, 2015, the Accounts internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the registrants independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not subject to attestation by the Registrants independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the company to provide only managements report in this annual report.
(c) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There have been no changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants last fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Not applicable.
107
The TIAA Real Estate Account has no officers or directors and no TIAA trustee or executive officer receives compensation from the Account. The Trustees and certain principal executive officers of TIAA as of March 1, 2016, their dates of birth, and their principal occupations during at least the last five years, are as follows:
Trustees
Ronald L. Thompson (Chairman), DOB: 6/17/49
Director, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and Medical University of South Carolina Foundation, and Trustee, Washington University in St. Louis. Member, Plymouth Ventures Partnership II Advisory Board.
Jeffrey R. Brown, DOB: 2/16/68
Josef and Margot Lakonishok Professor of Business and Dean of the College of Business at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (since 2015). Professor of Finance and Director of the Center for Business and Public Policy, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (since 2007).
James R. Chambers, DOB: 9/19/57
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer (since 2013), Weight Watchers International, Inc. President, US Snacks and Confectionary at Kraft Foods (2010 to 2012). Director, Big Lots, Inc.
Robert C. Clark, DOB: 2/26/44
Harvard University Distinguished Service Professor and Austin Wakeman Scott Professor of Law, Harvard Law School, Harvard University (since 2003). Director of the Hodson Trust, Time Warner, Inc. and Omnicom Group, Inc.
Lisa W. Hess, DOB: 8/8/55
President and Managing Partner, SkyTop Capital (since 2010). Director of Radian Group, Inc., Covariance Capital Management, Inc. (Covariance), and TIAA-CREF Trust Company, FSB.
Edward M. Hundert, M.D., DOB: 10/1/56
Harvard University Medical School, Dean for Medical Education and Daniel D. Federman, M.D. Professor in Residence of Global Health and Social Medicine and Medical Education (since 2014). Formerly, senior lecturer in Medical Ethics (2007 to 2014), and Director of the Center for Teaching and
Learning, Harvard Medical School (2011 to 2014). Formerly, independent consultant, Huron Consulting Group (2011 to 2014).
Lawrence H. Linden, DOB: 2/19/47
Founding Trustee of the Linden Trust for Conservation, Member of the Board of Directors of the World Wildlife Fund and Advisory Director to the Redstone Strategy Group. Strategic Advisory Board Member, New World Capital Group.
Maureen OHara, DOB: 6/13/53
R.W. Purcell Professor of Finance at Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (since 1992), where she has taught since 1979. Chair of the board of Investment Technology Group, Inc. (2007 to 2016), and member of the board (2003 to 2016). Director of New Star Financial, Inc.
Donald K. Peterson, DOB: 8/13/49
Trustee emeritus of Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Director, Sanford C. Bernstein Fund Inc., Bernstein Fund Inc., and TIAA-CREF Trust Company, FSB.
Sidney A. Ribeau, DOB: 12/3/47
Professor of Communications, Howard University (since 2014). President, Howard University (2008 to 2013). Director, Worthington Industries.
108
Dorothy K. Robinson, DOB: 2/18/51
Of Counsel at K&L Gates (since 2016). Former Senior Counselor to the President of Yale University (2014 to 2015). Formerly, Vice President and General Counsel, Yale University (1995 to 2014). Trustee of Yale University Press, London. Director, TIAA-CREF Trust Company, FSB.
Kim M. Sharan, DOB: 10/20/57
Former President of Financial Planning and Wealth Strategies and Chief Marketing Officer at Ameriprise Financial (2002 to 2014). Director, Girls, Inc.
David L. Shedlarz, DOB: 4/17/48
Director, Pitney Bowes Inc., The Hershey Company, and TIAA-CREF Trust Company, FSB.
Marta Tienda, DOB: 8/10/50
Maurice P. During 22 Professor in Demographic Studies and Professor of Sociology and Public Affairs, Princeton University (since 1999). Olivia Margaret Sage Visiting Scholar at the Russell Sage Foundation (since 2015). Trustee, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and Jacobs Foundation.
OfficerTrustees
Roger W. Ferguson, Jr., DOB: 10/28/51
President and Chief Executive Officer of TIAA and CREF (since 2008).
Other TIAA Executive Officers
Robert G. Leary, DOB: 3/20/61
Executive Vice President, Asset Management Chief Executive Officer of TIAA. Principal Executive Officer and Executive Vice President of CREF and VA-1. Principal Executive Officer and President of TIAA-CREF Funds and TIAA-CREF Life Funds. Prior to joining TIAA, Mr. Leary served as a
Representative, Securities Research, Inc., President and Chief Operating Officer, U.S., ING Americas, Chief Executive Officer, ING Insurance US, and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, ING Investment Management, Americas.
Virginia M. Wilson, DOB: 7/22/54
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of TIAA and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of CREF. Prior to joining TIAA, Ms. Wilson served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Wyndham Worldwide Corporation.
Ronald Pressman, DOB: 4/11/58
Executive Vice President, Institutional Financial Services Chief Executive Officer of TIAA, and Executive Vice President of the TIAA-CREF Fund Complex. Prior to joining TIAA, Mr. Pressman served as President and Chief Executive Officer of General Electric Capital Real Estate.
Edward D. Van Dolsen, DOB: 4/21/58
Executive Vice President, Individual Financial Services Chief Executive Officer of TIAA, and Executive Vice President of the TIAA-CREF Fund Complex.
Portfolio Management Team
Gerald Casimir, DOB: 10/16/59
Managing Director and Portfolio Manager, TIAA Real Estate Account. (Since 2015) Head of U.S. Real Estate Asset
Management, TIAA (2011-2015). Head of Real Estate Asset Management, U.S. Northeastern Region, TIAA (2009-2011).
Gordon (Chris) McGibbon, DOB: 11/25/72
Managing Director, Head of Americas, Global Real Estate, TIAA. (Since 2016)
Heather Davis, DOB: 12/18/60
Senior Managing Director, Chief Investment Officer, Global Real Assets, TIAA. (Since 2016)
Audit Committee Financial Expert
On February 10, 2016, the Board of Trustees of TIAA determined that Lisa W. Hess and Donald K. Peterson qualify as Audit Committee Financial Experts. Each such Trustee is independent (as that term is used in
109
Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) and has not accepted, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from TIAA, other than in his or her capacity as Trustee.
Code of Ethics
The Board of Trustees of TIAA has adopted a code of ethics for senior financial officers, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, or controller, and persons performing similar functions, in conformity with rules promulgated under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
The code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this annual report.
During the reporting period, there were no implicit or explicit waivers granted by the Registrant from any provision of the code of ethics.
Not applicable.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
The TIAA general account plays a significant role in operating the Real Estate Account, including providing a liquidity guarantee, and investment advisory, administrative, and other services. In addition, Services, a wholly owned subsidiary of TIAA, provides distribution services for the Account.
Liquidity Guarantee. If the Accounts liquid assets and its cash flow from operating activities and participant transactions are insufficient to fund redemption requests, the TIAA general account has agreed to purchase liquidity units. TIAA thereby guarantees that a participant can redeem accumulation units at their net asset value next determined. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Account expensed $31.7 million for this liquidity guarantee from TIAA through a daily deduction from the net assets of the Account. During 2012 and through the date of this annual report, the TIAA general account has not purchased any liquidity units. During the months of June, September, December 2012, and March 2013, the Account redeemed all outstanding liquidity units representing a total of $940.3 million and $325.4 million redeemed during 2012 and 2013, respectively.
Investment Advisory and Administration Services/Mortality and Expense Risks Borne by TIAA. Deductions are made each valuation day from the net assets of the Account for various services required to manage investments, administer the Account and distribute the contracts. These services are performed at cost by TIAA and Services. Deductions are also made each valuation day to cover mortality and expense risks borne by TIAA.
For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Account expensed $69.3 million for investment advisory services and $1.1 million for mortality and expense risks provided/borne by TIAA. For the same period, the Account expensed $80.8 million for administrative and distribution services provided by TIAA and Services.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) performs independent audits of the registrants consolidated financial statements. To maintain auditor independence and avoid even the appearance of conflicts of interest, the registrant, as a policy, does not engage PwC for management advisory or consulting services.
Audit Fees. PwCs fees for professional services rendered for the audits of the registrants annual consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 and review of consolidated financial statements included in the registrants quarterly reports were $1,130,000 and $1,169,000 respectively.
Audit-Related Fees. The registrant had no audit-related services for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.
110
Tax Fees. PwC had no tax fees with respect to registrant for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.
All Other Fees. Other than as set forth above, there were no additional fees with respect to registrant.
Preapproval Policy. In June of 2003, the audit committee of TIAAs Board of Trustees (Audit Committee) adopted a Preapproval Policy for External Audit Firm Services (the Policy), which applies to the registrant. The Policy describes the types of services that may be provided by the independent auditor to the registrant without impairing the auditors independence. Under the Policy, the Audit Committee is required to preapprove services to be performed by the registrants independent auditor in order to ensure that such services do not impair the auditors independence.
The Policy requires the Audit Committee to: (i) appoint the independent auditor to perform the financial statement audit for the registrant and certain of its affiliates, including approving the terms of the engagement and (ii) preapprove the audit, audit-related and tax services to be provided by the independent auditor and the fees to be charged for provision of such services from year to year.
111
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
(A) |
Distribution Agreement for the Contracts Funded by the TIAA Real Estate Account, dated as of January 1, 2008, by and among Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, for itself and on behalf of the Account, and TIAA-CREF Individual & Institutional Services, LLC.4 |
||
(3) |
(A) |
Restated Charter of TIAA (as amended).5 |
||
|
(B) |
Amended Bylaws of TIAA.6 |
||
(4) |
(A) |
Forms of RA, GRA, GSRA, SRA, IRA Real Estate Account Endorsements2, Keogh Contract,3 Retirement Select and Retirement Select Plus Contracts and Endorsements1 and Retirement Choice and Retirement Choice Plus Contracts.3 |
||
|
(B) |
Forms of Income-Paying Contracts2 |
||
|
(C) |
Form of Contract Endorsement for Internal Transfer Limitation7 |
||
(10) |
(A) |
Amended and Restated Independent Fiduciary Letter Agreement, dated as of February 2, 2015, between TIAA, on behalf of the Registrant, and RERC, LLC8 |
||
|
(B) |
Custodian Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2008, by and between TIAA, on behalf of the Registrant, and State Street Bank and Trust Company, N.A.9 |
||
*(14) |
|
|
Code of Ethics of TIAA |
|
*(31) |
|
|
Rule 13(a)-15(e)/ Rule 13a-15(e)/15d-15(e) Certifications |
|
*(32) |
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications |
|
**(101) |
|
|
The following financial information from the annual report on Form 10-K for the periods ended December 31, 2015, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Statements of Assets and Liabilities, (ii) the Statements of Operations, (iii) the Statements of Changes in Net Assets, (iv) the Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) the Notes to the Financial Statements. Any other required schedule has been omitted because the schedule is not applicable to the registrant. |
* |
Filed herewith. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
** |
Furnished electronically herewith. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) |
Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to the Accounts Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 29, 2004 (File No. 333-113602). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) |
Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to the Accounts Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 30, 1996 (File No. 33-92990). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) |
Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to the Accounts Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed May 2, 2005 (File No. 333-121493). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) |
Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1(A) the Accounts Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the Commission on March 15, 2013 (File No. 333-187309). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(5) |
Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(A) to the Accounts Registration Statement On Form S-1, filed with the Commission on April 22, 2015 (File No. 333-202583). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(6) |
Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(B) to the Accounts Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the Commission on April 22, 2015 (File No. 333-202583). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(7) |
Previously filed and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(C) to the Accounts Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and filed with the Commission on November 12, 2010 (File No. 33-92990). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(8) |
Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Accounts Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on February 6, 2015 (File No. 33-92990). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(9) |
Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.(b) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Account for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 and filed with the Commission on March 14, 2013 (File No. 33-92990). |
112
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant, TIAA Real Estate Account, has duly caused this annual report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in New York, New York, on the 10th day of March, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TIAA REAL ESTATE ACCOUNT |
|||
|
By: |
TEACHERS INSURANCE AND |
||
March 10, 2016 |
|
/s/ Robert G. Leary |
||
|
|
|||
|
|
Robert G. Leary |
||
|
|
Executive Vice President, Asset Management Chief |
||
|
|
Executive Officer of Teachers Insurance and |
||
Annuity Association of America |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Report has been signed by the following trustees and officers of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature |
Title |
Date |
||||
|
||||||
/s/ ROGER W. FERGUSON, JR.
|
President and Chief Executive Officer of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America and Trustee |
March 10, 2016 |
||||
/s/ ROBERT G. LEARY
|
Executive Vice President, Asset Management Chief Executive Officer of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (Principal Executive Officer) |
March 10, 2016 |
||||
/s/ VIRGINIA M. WILSON
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
March 10, 2016 |
||||
/s/ RONALD L. THOMPSON
|
Chairman of the Board of Trustees |
March 10, 2016 |
||||
/s/ JEFFREY R. BROWN
|
Trustee |
March 10, 2016 |
||||
/s/ JAMES R. CHAMBERS
|
Trustee |
March 10, 2016 |
||||
/s/ ROBERT C. CLARK
|
Trustee |
March 10, 2016 |
||||
/s/ LISA W. HESS
|
Trustee |
March 10, 2016 |
||||
/s/ EDWARD M. HUNDERT, M.D.
|
Trustee |
March 10, 2016 |
||||
/s/ LAWRENCE H. LINDEN
|
Trustee |
March 10, 2016 |
||||
/s/ MAUREEN OHARA
|
Trustee |
March 10, 2016 |
||||
/s/ DONALD K. PETERSON
|
Trustee |
March 10, 2016 |
||||
/s/ SIDNEY A. RIBEAU
|
Trustee |
March 10, 2016 |
||||
/s/ DOROTHY K. ROBINSON
|
Trustee |
March 10, 2016 |
||||
/s/ KIM M. SHARAN
|
Trustee |
March 10, 2016 |
/s/ DAVID L. SHEDLARZ
|
Trustee |
March 10, 2016 |
||||
/s/ MARTA TIENDA
|
Trustee |
March 10, 2016 |
113
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED WITH REPORTS FILED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 15(D) OF THE ACT BY REGISTRANTS WHICH HAVE NOT REGISTERED
SECURITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE ACT
Because the Registrant has no voting securities, nor its own management or board of directors, no annual report or proxy materials will be sent to contract owners holding interests in the Account.
114