UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): January 19, 2016
  

TERRAFORM POWER, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
Incorporation)
001-36542 
(Commission File Number)
46-4780940
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

7550 Wisconsin Avenue, 9th Floor, Bethesda, Maryland, 20814
 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
 


(240) 762-7700
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provision (see General Instruction A.2 below):

o  Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
o  Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
o  Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
o  Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




Item 8.01    Other Events.

On December 28, 2015, a verified stockholder derivative complaint (Central Laborers’ Pension Fund et al. v. Peter Blackmore et al., Case No. 11847) on behalf of TerraForm Power, Inc. (the “Company”), was filed in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware against the Company and the Company’s parent and controlling stockholder, SunEdison, Inc. and SunEdison Holdings Corporation, a subsidiary of SunEdison, Inc. (together with SunEdison, Inc., “SunEdison”), and certain individual directors of the Company. The lawsuit alleges that certain members of the Company’s board of directors breached their fiduciary duties of loyalty and care by agreeing to enter into an agreement (the “July Vivint Transaction”) with SunEdison on July 20, 2015 to acquire certain residential rooftop solar assets (the “Vivint Assets”) that SunEdison was acquiring as part of SunEdison’s acquisition of Vivint Solar, Inc. (“Vivint Solar”), by agreeing to terms that were grossly unfair to the Company and designed for the benefit of SunEdison, thereby failing to act in the best interests of the Company. The lawsuit further alleges that the approval of the modifications to the Company’s agreements under the July Vivint Transaction (the “December Vivint Transaction”) by the board of directors of the Company was on terms that are unfair to the Company and improperly favor SunEdison to the detriment of the Company and its stockholders. The complaint further alleges that SunEdison, as the Company’s controlling stockholder, breached its fiduciary duty not to advance SunEdison’s interest at the expense of the Company’s interests by causing the Company to (i) overpay to acquire assets in both the July Vivint Transaction and in the December Vivint Transaction in order to finance SunEdison’s purchase of Vivint Solar, and (ii) commit to purchase future residential solar systems from SunEdison over the next five years so that SunEdison could use the Company’s commitment to acquire a loan to partially cover its financial obligations in its transaction to acquire Vivint Solar. The plaintiffs in the lawsuit seek damages for the Company for the damages the Company has and will suffer as a result of the defendants’ breaches of fiduciary duty. The lawsuit also seeks an award of the plaintiffs’ costs and disbursements, including attorneys’ fees and expenses.

On January 12, 2016, a verified stockholder derivative complaint (Appaloosa Investment Limited Partnership I et al. v. SunEdison, Inc. et al., Case No. 11898) on behalf of the Company was filed in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware against SunEdison and three of the Company’ individual directors. The lawsuit alleges that SunEdison, as the Company’s controlling stockholder, breached its fiduciary duties to the Company and its minority stockholders by causing the Company, amongst other things, to (i) enter into an amended transaction to acquire the Vivint Assets from SunEdison for its benefits at the expense of the Company’s interests, (ii) purchase the Vivint Assets at an unfair price, and (iii) agree to an unfair arrangement so that SunEdison could use such commitment by the Company to acquire a loan to partially cover its financial obligations in connection with its own contemplated merger with Vivint Solar, for which SunEdison never compensated the Company. The lawsuit also contends that the current members of the Corporate Governance and Conflicts Committee of the Company’s board of directors breached their fiduciary duty of loyalty to the Company’s minority stockholders by, amongst other things, approving the transaction on terms that are unfair to the Company and improperly favor SunEdison to the detriment of the Company and its stockholders. The lawsuit seeks to enjoin the completion of the transaction, rescission of such transaction or, alternatively, awarding rescissory damages, in the event it is consummated. The lawsuit also seeks an award of the plaintiffs’ costs and disbursements, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses.
The Company believes the plaintiffs’ allegations in each verified stockholder derivative lawsuit are without merit and intends to contest these allegations vigorously.




SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Date: January 19, 2016


 
TERRAFORM POWER, INC. 
 
 
 
By:    /s/ Sebastian Deschler        
 
Name: Sebastian Deschler
Title: Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary