Exhibit 10.1

FIFTH AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AND SECURITY AGREEMENT

This Fifth Amendment to Credit and Security Agreement (this “Fifth Amendment”), dated as of November 13, 2015, is made by and among COMMAND SECURITY CORPORATION, a New York corporation (“CSC” or “Borrower”), and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association, acting through its Wells Fargo Business Credit operating division (“Wells Fargo”).

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, the Borrower and Wells Fargo are parties to a certain Credit and Security Agreement dated as of February 12, 2009 (as amended by that certain Amendment to Credit and Security Agreement dated as of December 1, 2009, that certain Second Amendment to Credit and Security Agreement dated as of October 18, 2011, that certain Third Amendment to Credit and Security Agreement dated as of November 6, 2012, that certain Fourth Amendment to Credit and Security Agreement dated as of June 30, 2014, and as further amended, supplemented and in effect, collectively, the “Credit Agreement”); and

WHEREAS, the Borrower has requested that Wells Fargo modify and amend certain terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement; and

WHEREAS, the Wells Fargo has agreed to modify and amend certain terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement, all as provided herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, it is agreed as follows:

“Funds from Operations” means for a given period, the sum of (a) Net Income, (b) depreciation and amortization, (c) any increase (or decrease) in deferred income taxes, (d) any increase (or decrease) in lifo reserves, (e) other non-cash items, (f) Relocation Expenses, and (g) Leal Litigation Settlement Costs, each as determined for such period in accordance with GAAP.

(i) “Leal Litigation” means that certain lawsuit filed by Jose Leal, on behalf of himself and other similarly situated, v. Command Security Corporation d/b/a CSC Security Services, Superior Court of the State of California, Orange County, Case No. 30-2011-00472660-CU-OE-CXC.

(ii) “Leal Litigation Settlement Costs” means such amounts to be paid by Borrower in settlement of all claims pursuant to the Leal Litigation, including costs for attorneys’ fees and expenses; provided however that aggregate amount of all such Leal Litigation Settlement Costs shall not exceed $2,000,000 in the aggregate.”

“Jose Leal, on behalf of himself and other similarly situated, v. Command Security Corporation d/b/a CSC Security Services, Superior Court of the State of California, Orange County, Case No. 30-2011-00472660-CU-OE-CXC

On April 29, 2014, the California Superior Court granted a plaintiff’s motion (Leal v. Command Security Corporation) to certify a class consisting of all persons who were employed by the Company in a non-exempt security officer position within the State of California at any time since May 2, 2007 through the date of trial who agreed to and signed an on-duty meal period agreement at the time of their employment. The case is a certified class action involving allegations that the Company violated certain California state laws relating to on-duty meal and rest breaks.

On October 13, 2015, the parties participated in mediation and, on October 15, 2015, both parties accepted the terms of the mediator’s proposal. On November 12, 2015, the Company and the plaintiff’s counsel executed a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) in which it was agreed that the maximum settlement amount will be $2.0 million, including plaintiff’s attorney fees and costs, administration costs, and certain other miscellaneous costs. As part of the MOU, it was further agreed that (i) the final settlement will be subject to court approval; (ii) a minimum of 50% of the net proceeds will be distributed to the class; and (iii) the settlement will be paid in two installments, the first to be paid upon court approval of the final settlement agreement and the second to be paid no later than one year from final approval. The settlement is not an admission of liability and the Company denies any wrongdoing.”

[Remainder of Page Left Blank Intentionally]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party hereto has executed this Fifth Amendment as a sealed instrument under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts through its authorized officer as of the date set forth above.

Signature Page to Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement