PREMIER HOLDING CORP. - FORM 10-K/A

Attached files

file	filename
EX-10.4 - POWER SUPPLY COORDINATION AGREEMENT - PREMIER HOLDING CORP.	premier_10k-ex1004.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATIONS - PREMIER HOLDING CORP.	premier_10k-ex3101.htm
EX-10.1 - MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT - PREMIER HOLDING CORP.	premier_10k-ex1001.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION - PREMIER HOLDING CORP.	premier_10k-ex3201.htm
EX-10.2 - BROKER AGREEMENT - PREMIER HOLDING CORP.	premier_10k-ex1002.htm
EX-10.3 - RESIDENTIAL ENROLLMENT CONSENT FORM - PREMIER HOLDING CORP.	premier_10k-ex1003.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K/A

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013

Commission file number: 000-53824

PREMIER HOLDING CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		88-0344135
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1382 Valencia Avenue, Unit F		92780
Tustin, California		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code 949-260-8070

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, Par Value $0.0001

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:

Large Accelerated Filer o		Accelerated Filer o		Smaller Reporting Company x		Non-Accelerated Filer o
						(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

Aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates: $1,094,817, based on the closing sales price of our common stock on June 28, 2013 of $0.09 per share. The voting stock held by non-affiliates on that date consisted of 12,164,636 shares of common stock.

The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of June 30, 2013 was 77,729,546 shares. As of April 11, 2014 the number of shares outstanding of each registrant’s classes of common stock was 148,697,016.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
		PAGE

Item 1	Business	3

Item 1A	Risk Factors	6

Item 2	Properties	8

Item 3	Legal Proceedings	8

Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosure	8

Item 5	Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	9

Item 6	Selected Financial Data	10

Item 7	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	11

Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	16

Item 8	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	16

Item 9	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	16

Item 9A	Controls and Procedures	16

Item 9B	Other Information	17

Item 10	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	18

Item 11	Executive Compensation	20

Item 12	Securities Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	22

Item 13	Certain Relationships And Related Transactions, and Director Independence	22

Item 14	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	23

Item 15	Exhibits, Financial Statements, Schedules	24

Item 1. BUSINESS

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements

This Annual Report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). These statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions, and on information currently available to management. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning possible or assumed future results of operations of the Company set forth under the heading “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition or Plan of Operation.” Forward-looking statements also include statements in which words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” “consider” or similar expressions are used.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. The Company's future results and shareholder values may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.

Corporate History

Premier Holding Corporation (“Premier” or the “Company”) provides deregulated energy services to its clients including the sale of lower cost power, fixed energy costs and energy efficient products that range from complete indoor and outdoor lighting arrays. The Company anticipates adding additional services lines including proprietary lighting solutions to energy efficient motors and chillers for HVAC and refrigeration in the future.

Premier was incorporated in Nevada on October 18, 1971. Premier’s fiscal year end is December 31. Premier has never been in bankruptcy, receivership or any similar proceeding, but has been the subject of a custodianship proceeding in the Nevada state courts.

Premier was originally organized under the name of Mr. Nevada, Inc., and following the completion of a limited public offering in April 1972 commenced limited operations which were discontinued in 1990. Thereafter, Premier engaged in reorganization and, on several occasions, sought to merge with or acquire certain active private companies or operations, all of which were terminated or resulted in discontinued negotiations. On October 20, 1995, Premier changed its name to Intermark Development Corporation. On November 4, 1996, Premier acquired all of the capital stock of HVM Development Limited ("HDL"), formerly known as OVM Development Limited, a British Virgin Islands corporation, and changed its name to OVM International Holding Corporation.

Premier stopped filing reports under the federal securities laws in November 2002. Premier lost its Nevada corporate charter in 2006 for failure to file an Annual List of its officers and directors with the Secretary of the State of Nevada. On November 1, 2006, Premier’s corporate charter was revoked by the Secretary of State of Nevada. Thereupon, the resident agent of Premier in Nevada resigned for non-payment of fees.

On May 8, 2007, the Nevada Court entered a default judgment, appointing Jeffrey Volpe as custodian of Premier under NRS 78.347(2). On May 9, 2007, Jeffrey Volpe, as custodian of Premier, appointed himself as the sole officer and director of Premier, and Premier’s charter was restored. On May 18, 2007, Dr. Jack Gregory was appointed as Chief Executive Officer and Director and Jasmine Gregory was appointed as Secretary/Treasurer and Director of Premier. At that time, Jeffrey Volpe resigned as an officer and director. There are no relationships between Dr. Gregory and Mr. Volpe, nor are there any relationships between Jasmine Gregory and Mr. Volpe.

On September 11, 2008, Premier’s registration under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), was revoked pursuant to Section 12 (j) of the Exchange Act for failure to file periodic reports as required by Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act and trading of Premier’s common stock on the pink sheets was suspended. Premier has re-registered its common stock under the Exchange Act and, after successfully filing a Form 15c2-11, has once again obtained a quotation for its common stock. Premier stock is now quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board with the symbol PRHL.

Our Businesses

In December 2011, Premier acquired assets from WePower, LLC, a Delaware LLC and Green Central Holdings, Inc. a Nevada Corp. Premier also formed WePower Ecolutions, Inc. a Delaware corporation (“Ecolutions”), as a wholly-owned subsidiary, and began to offer clean energy products and services to commercial markets and developers and management companies of large-scale residential developments. Premier appointed Kevin Donovan the Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of Ecolutions on February 22, 2012 to establish the energy services business. On February 22, 2012 Mr. Donovan was appointed CEO and President.

In October 2012, Premier divested itself of an underperforming business line which were acquired by a newly formed entity known as WePowerEco Corp, created by the outgoing management team including Mr. Donovan. Premier’s incoming management team, led by its new Chief Executive Officer Randall Letcavage, negotiated the sale of the product line and prospects with WePowerEco Corp. in exchange for an unsecured promissory note in the face amount of $5,000,000. The product line and prospects have been valued at $869,000. In connection with the sale of the product line and prospects, Premier agreed not to compete with WePower Eco Corp’s solar and wind products for a period of two years following the sale. In addition, Premier agreed to the prior management team using the WePower name in a newly formed company separate from Premier.

In 2012, Premier acquired a unique technology for energy efficient lighting, the E-Series controller, developed by Active ES. This patented technology provides an upgrade for existing HID lamps for high-bay indoor and outdoor applications where other existing options for efficiency are few, expensive, and untested. Premier made available this technology to its subsidiary Ecolutions. Thereafter, Ecolutions changed its name to Energy Efficient Experts (E³). In the fourth quarter, Premier redesigned and reengineered its products for mass production and expanding the product line. This redesign means that the product can go from custom made to mass production and rapid installation. Also in the fourth quarter,Premier formed a strategic alliance with Muni-Fed Energy, LLC, a California LLC, who has strong relationships with Municipalities, Ports, and real estate investment trusts in the Southern California market and beyond. Premier also formalized its relationship with Orion Energy of Southern California, giving Premier access to a large product offering in lighting and energy controls.

On February 28, 2013, Premier acquired an 80% ownership interest in “The Power Company USA, LLC” (“TPC”), a deregulated power broker in Illinois. On the date of acquisition, TPC had over 14,000 clients, and has been adding between 1,000 and 2,000 clients per month. A portion of these clients have large commercial/industrial facilities such as warehouses and distribution center.

Our Industry

Premier bridges two industries in the Energy field: Deregulation (reselling power from suppliers) and energy efficiency technologies. Deregulated power is expected to be one of the largest markets since the deregulation of telecom, only much larger. Energy efficiency companies, sometimes referred to as energy services companies, or ESCOs, develop, install and arrange financing for projects designed to improve the energy efficiency of client facilities. Typical products and services offered by energy efficiency companies include lighting and lighting retrofits, HVAC upgrades, motor controls, equipment installations, load management, and can include power generation including on-site cogeneration, renewable energy plants, etc. As Premier grows it expects to be involved in all these opportunities. Energy efficiency companies often offer their products and services through energy savings performance contracts, or ESPCs. Under these contracts, energy efficiency companies assume certain responsibilities for the performance of the installed measures, under assumed conditions, for a portion of the project’s economic lifetime. Premier and its affiliates operate as a deregulated power reseller an as an ESCO.

Marketing

Premier’s sales and marketing strategy captures the unique opportunity of being in two closely related, but separate industries. Through The Power Company, the company will reach approximately 50,000 consumers a year for deregulated power. A portion of these (the commercial/industrial customers) will also be candidates for the Efficiency industry. The Power Company, as it becomes integrated with E³, will help E3 gain the ability to cross market its product line to their already existing client base of thousands of new commercial/industrial prospects. This provides an advantage over the competition by offering a complete clean energy solution package of a much lower cost of power and, by the use of its energy efficiency products, the reduction of their consumption of energy.

In addition to these valuable clients from TPC, the company’s strategy is to approach large and qualified prospects through a network of resellers and alliance partners with pre-existing relationships and/or top-tier reputations in their respective markets (as well as direct sales as described below), and to offer their clientele customized and comprehensive energy efficiency solutions tailored to meet their economic, operational and efficiency goals.

Throughout the industry the evaluation, proposal, sales, and implementation process for energy efficiency and renewable energy projects can typically take from 12 to 24 months or longer, due to the prescriptive nature of a consultative sale. Sales to state and federal governmental and housing authority customers tend to require the longest lead time. E³ identifies direct-sales opportunities through the pre-existing relationships of its team, as well as referrals, requests for proposals, conferences, web searches, telemarketing and additional product/service sales to existing customers.

E³ also supports its network of resellers with a wide range of energy efficiency products through its alliance with suppliers, as well as its growing list of proprietary products. E³ not only provides products at a very competitive rate, but supports its resellers through training, marketing material, team sales visits, and a sales support infrastructure that can reduce the typical sales cycle time.

Lead qualification has been automated such that a prospect can be evaluated over the phone, reducing the expense of performing audits and surveys on unqualified prospects. As the business develops we expect the audits will be performed by qualified sales engineers, typically LEED certified (Leaders in Energy Efficiency Design, a program under the US Department of Energy’s Green Building Council) and/or certified electricians, which results in a more comprehensive, professional, accurate and competitive proposal. The Company and its resellers utilize trained and certified electricians and engineers to perform the installation, further increasing customer satisfaction. Follow-up reports verify energy savings performance. The Company also has access to funding options which can meet the unique financial requirement of the client, including no-money down, and immediately cash-flow-positive programs.

Employees

As of December 31, 2013, Premier’s senior management consisted of three independent contractors along with additional contracted support staff and independent resellers and consultants. Premier expects to hire additional personnel as its business expands.

Patents

Premier acquired all patents owned by Active ES Lighting Controls; the three pertinent US patents are as follows:

U.S. Patent No. 5,528,110; Entitled Apparatus For Control Of Load Power Consumption; Issued June 18, 1996

U.S. Patent No. 5,508,589; Entitled Power Saving Voltage Reduction System For High Intensity Discharge Lighting Systems; Issued April 16, 1996

U.S. Patent No. 5,623,186; Entitled Power Saving Voltage Reduction System For High Intensity Discharge Lighting Systems; Issued April 22, 1997

U.S. Patent No. 7,084,587; Entitled Apparatus And Method For Control Of High Intensity Discharge Lighting; Issued August 1, 2006;

U.S. Patent No. 7,825,614; Entitled Voltage Control Load Center, Modular Voltage Control Transformer Circuit, And Method Of Making And Using; Issued November 2, 2010; and

U.S. Patent No. 7,973,490; Entitled Hid Lighting Control With Transient Voltage Sensing And Lamp Restarting, And Method Of Making And Using; Issued July 5, 2011.

International Patents

Title	Country/Type	Filing Date	Status
Apparatus & Method For Control Of High Intensity Discharge Lighting	India	8/26/05	Published
(Same)	Canada	8/26/05	Issued: 07/20/2010 No: 2,577,416
(Same)	Israel	8/26/05	Pending
(Same)	Japan	8/26/05	Pending
(Same)	Mexico	8/26/05	Issued: 11/18/2009 Pending
(Same)	Egypt	8/26/05	Pending
Voltage Control Load Center Modular Voltage Control Transformer Circuit & Method Of Making & Using	Egypt	9/21/08	Pending
(Same)	India	9/18/08	Pending
(Same)	Indonesia	3/20/07	Pending
(Same)	Japan	3/20/07	Pending
(Same)	Mexico	3/20/07	Issued: 12/06/2010 No: 281748
(Same)	Malaysia	3/20/07	Pending

These patents pertain to the E-Series Lighting controls line of products.

Government Regulation

Various regulations affect the conduct of Premier’s business. The applicable regulatory requirements differ in each state and between agencies of the federal government.

Premier’s projects must conform to all applicable electric reliability, building and safety, and environmental regulations and codes, which vary from place to place and time to time. Various federal, state, provincial and local permits are required to construct an energy efficiency project or renewable energy plant.

Some of the demand reduction services that Premier provides for utilities and institutional clients are subject to regulatory tariffs imposed under federal and state utility laws. In addition, the operation of, and electrical interconnection for, Premier’s renewable energy projects are subject to federal, state or provincial interconnection and federal reliability standards also set forth in utility tariffs. These tariffs specify rules, business practices and economic terms to which Premier is subject. The tariffs are drafted by the utilities and approved by the utilities’ state, provincial or federal regulatory commissions.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

Premier is subject to various risks which may materially harm its business, financial condition and results of operations. Any investor should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and the other information in this filing. If any of these risks or uncertainties actually occurs, Premier’s business, financial condition or operating results could be materially harmed. In that case, the price of Premier’s common stock could decline and investors could lose all or part of their investment.

Premier is a relatively young company with limited operating history.

Because Premier is a relatively young company, it is difficult to evaluate its business and prospects. Premier’s future operating results will depend on many factors, including the ability to generate sustained and increased demand and acceptance of its products, the level of its competition, and its ability to attract and maintain key management and employees. While management believes their estimates of projected occurrences and events are within the timetable of Premier’s business plan, there can be no guarantees or assurances that the results anticipated will occur.

If we are unable to attract and retain key personnel, we may not be able to compete effectively in our market.

Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to attract and retain key management, design experts, and sales and marketing personnel. Our inability to retain employees and attract and retain sufficient additional employees, and design, drafting, and marketing support resources, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. The loss of key personnel could limit our ability to develop and market our products.

Premier Expects to incur net losses in future quarters.

If Premier does not achieve profitability, Premier’s business may not grow or operate. Premier may not achieve sufficient revenues or profitability in any future period. Premier will need to generate revenues from the sales of its products or take steps to reduce operating costs to achieve and maintain profitability. Even if Premier is able to generate revenues, Premier cannot be certain that it can sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis.

Premier will likely need to raise funds to operate in accordance with its business plan.

Premier is a growing its businesses and as a result it is likely that they will need additional cash to support that growth, both to support operating losses as long as those continue, as well for the potential acquisition of other companies, or the purchase of certain assets from other companies. At this time the Company cannot estimate either the amount of cash required or the form that it will attempt to raise this cash.

Our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed doubts about our ability to continue as a going concern.

The report of Premier’s independent accountants on its December 31, 2013 financial statements included an explanatory paragraph indicating that there is substantial doubt about Premier’s ability to continue as a going concern due to recurring losses and working capital shortages. Premier’s ability to continue as a going concern will be determined by its ability to obtain funding and develop a profitable operation. Premier’s financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Premier does not expect to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.

For the foreseeable future, it is anticipated that earnings, if any, that may be generated from Premier’s operations will be used to finance its operations and cash dividends will not be paid to holders of Premier’s common stock. Premier expects to be subject to SEC regulations and changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, new SEC regulations and other trading market rules which are creating uncertainty for public companies.

Premier is committed to maintaining high standards of corporate governance and public disclosure. As a result, Premier intends to invest appropriate resources to comply with evolving standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.

Premier’s Common Stock May Be Affected by Limited Trading Volume and May Fluctuate Significantly.

In the future, Premier’s common stock is likely to experience significant price and volume fluctuations which could adversely affect the market price of its common stock without regard to its operating performance. In addition, Premier believes that factors such as quarterly fluctuations in its financial results and changes in the overall economy or the condition of the financial markets could cause the price of its common stock to fluctuate substantially. Substantial fluctuations in Premier’s stock price could significantly reduce the price of its common stock.

Premier has not had Adequate Financial Controls in Place Which Could Adversely Effect the Financial Reporting.

Premier has not had adequate financial controls in place in the past, which has resulted in errors in its financial statements. If this happens again, investors may not be in possession of up to date and accurate financial information. Premier has hired an experienced financial consultant to assist in production of all futures financial statements and public filings. Premier plans to further strengthen financial controls by implementing an independent board of directors once Premier has resources to do so.

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, Premier is required to carry out evaluations, under the supervision and with the participation of Premier’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of Premier’s disclosure controls and procedures every quarter.

In designing and evaluating Premier’s disclosure controls and procedures, Premier recognizes that there are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their desired control objectives. Additionally, in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures, Premier’s management is required to apply its reasonable judgment.

Item 2. PROPERTIES

Premier’s corporate offices and warehouse are located at 1382 Valencia Avenue, Unit F, Tustin, California. Premier considers these facilities to be adequate for its current needs. These offices consist of 2,000 square feet, we pay rent of $2,500 on a month to month basis.

For the operations of The Power Company we rent 2,000 square feet of office space at 214 W. Ohio St, Chicago, IL for $4,000 per month. This lease expires in July 2015.

For the operations of TPC we rent 1,451 square feet of office space at 6600 York Rd, Baltimore, MD for $2,200 per month. The lease expires April 2017.

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Whitaker Energy, LLC

In 2013, Whitaker Energy, LLC (“WE”) filed a civil action the Superior Court of Dekalb County, State of Georgia, Case No. 13-CV8610-6, against The Power Company, USA, LLC and Premier Holding Company alleging that TPC is in default under its obligations to WE under a promissory note pursuant to which WE loaned TPC $150,000 in 2012 concurrent with WE’s purchase of a membership interest in TPC. Under the terms of the loan between TPC and WE, TPC owes a monthly payment to WE, the amount of which varies each month and is based on the number of contracts TPC enters into from door-to-door sales and call centers. TPC and WE dispute the number of contracts entered into by TPC after certain adjustments and charge-backs from cancellation of contracts by consumers. Under the complaint, WE seeks to recover $93,080 of principal under the loan, plus prejudgment interest in the amount of $9,184 and reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses of the litigation. Also, WE seeks an order from the court for access to TPC’s books and records. TPC and Premier Holding Corporation dispute the claim by WE that TPC is in default under the loan between TPE and WE. The parties to the litigation have been negotiating a settlement of the litigation which would include a monthly payment by TPC to WE of $4,000 in payment of the principal due and certain attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by WE. Under the terms of the settlement, WE seeks to recover a total of $110,000.

Hi-Tech Specialists, Inc.

Prior to its acquisition by The Power Company, Hi-Tech Specialists, Inc. filed suit against U.S.E.C. LLC d/b/a/ US Energy Consultants and Michail Skachko concerning the parties’ agreement seeking damages in an amount in excess of $789,077. The nature of the litigation relates to a contract between the parties wherein Hi-Tech Specialists was to solicit service agreements on behalf of U.S.E.C. The suit is on going and The Power Company is aggressively pursuing its claim against the parties named.

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Premier's common stock is listed and quoted on the over-the-counter Bulletin Board and OTCQB under the symbol PRHL. The following quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions.

	High		Low
Year ended December 31, 2012
First Quarter	$	1.30	$	0.50
Second Quarter	$	1.46	$	0.40
Third Quarter	$	1.30	$	0.10
Fourth Quarter	$	0.21	$	0.07
Year ended December 31, 2013
First Quarter	$	0.25	$	0.07
Second Quarter	$	0.12	$	0.06
Third Quarter	$	0.25	$	0.08
Fourth Quarter	$	0.25	$	0.14

On April 11, 2014, the closing sales price of our common stock as reported on the OTCQB was $0.15 per share. As of December 31, 2013, there were 148,003,328 shares of common stock issued and outstanding which are held by approximately 910 holders of record.

Dividends

Premier’s Board of Directors has not declared a cash dividend on its common stock during the last two fiscal years.

4. The broker or dealer who has affected sales of penny stock to a customer, unless exempted by the rules, is required to send to the customer a written statement containing the identity and number of shares or units of each such security and the estimated market value of the security. The imposition of these reporting and disclosure requirements on a broker or dealer make it unlawful for the broker or dealer to effect transactions in penny stocks on behalf of customers. Brokers or dealers may be discouraged from dealing in penny stocks, due to the additional time, responsibility involved, and, as a result, this may have a deleterious effect on the market for Premier's stock.

Sales of Unregistered Securities

From October 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013, the Company granted 3,530,606 shares of common stock to various consultants for services. A compensation expense of $572,147 was recorded during the period ended December 31, 2013.

From October 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013, the Company entered into a series of stock purchase agreements with accredited investors for the sale of 10,085,271 shares of its common stock. The sales closed and cash of $1,016,560 was received. There was no underwriter, no underwriting discounts or commissions, no general solicitation, no advertisement, and resale restrictions were imposed by placing a Rule 144 legend on the certificates. The persons who received securities have such knowledge in business and financial matters that he/she/it is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of the transaction. This transaction was exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, based upon Section 4(2) for transactions by the issuer not involving any public offering.

Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The registrant is a smaller reporting company, pursuant to Rule 229.10(f)(1), and is not required to report this information. The financial statements of Premier are attached.

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This discussion summarizes the significant factors affecting our consolidated operating results, consolidated financial condition, liquidity and cash flows for the periods ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. The discussion and analysis that follows should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and the notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results Of Operations is provided as a supplement to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and footnotes to help provide an understanding of our financial condition, the changes in our financial condition and our results of operations. Except for historical information, the matters discussed in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Consolidated Operations are forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties and are based upon judgments concerning various factors that are beyond our control. Our actual results could differ materially from the results anticipated in any forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors, including those discussed in Section 1A above – “Risk Factors.”

Overview

Premier Holding Corporation, a Nevada corporation (“Premier” or “PRHL” or the “Company”), provides deregulated energy services to its clients including the sale of lower cost power, fixed energy costs and energy efficient products that range from complete indoor and outdoor lighting arrays. The Company anticipates adding additional services lines including proprietary lighting solutions to energy efficient motors and chillers for HVAC and refrigeration in the future.

Premier provides solutions that enable customers to reduce their energy consumption, lower their operating and maintenance costs, and realize environmental benefits. Our comprehensive set of services includes competitive electricity plans and upgrades to a facility’s energy infrastructure.

In addition to organic growth, strategic acquisitions of complementary businesses and assets have been an important part of our historical development. Since inception, Premier has completed certain acquisitions which have enabled us to broaden our service offerings and expand our geographical reach.

In 2012, Premier acquired a unique marquee technology for energy efficient lighting, the E-Series controller developed by Active ES. This patented technology provides an upgrade for existing HID lamps for high-bay indoor and outdoor applications where the other current options for efficiency are few, expensive, and untested. This technology is being marketed by E³.

In the fourth quarter of 2012, Premier performed additional research and development to the products from Active ES adding two new products for mass production, the 480 volt version of the controller, suitable for ports and other large facilities, and a 240 volt version of the LiteOwl for Streetlights, vastly increasing the applicable market. Also in the fourth quarter,Premier formed a strategic alliance with Muni-Fed Energy who has strong relationships with municipalities, ports, and real estate investment trusts in the southern California and national market.

In the first quarter of 2013, Premier acquired an 80% stake in The Power Company, a deregulated power broker in Illinois. By the end of that quarter, The Power Company had over 14,000 clients, and has been adding between 1,000 and 3,000 clients per month (closing third quarter 2013 with 40,000 clients). Over 1,000 of these clients have large commercial/industrial facilities such as warehouses and distribution center, which are candidates for E³.

The Power Company's business model is to acquire commercial and residential clients who benefit from the law passed allowing for competition in the energy markets, known as the deregulation of energy. In many cases TPC saves its clients 10-30% on their energy bills by simply switching suppliers, all while the enrollee remains a client of their local utility (local utility continues to read meter, bill and service any interruptions). TPC is different than several of its competitors in that is has agreements with multiple energy suppliers allowing TPC to leverage its standing in the marketplace to garner competitive pricing for its clients by having its suppliers compete for their client's business. Currently, TPC has access to over 30 different suppliers and most of the agreements in place allow for TPC to be paid for the life of the client’s tenure with the supplier. TPC is garnering its clients through strategic partnerships, trained in-house commercial and door-to-door residential agents and call centers. TPC has launched its online client portal dubbed NEST (National Energy Service Transactor). This sophisticated portal enables rapid, efficient and secure sales transactions of deregulated power. NEST is designed to enable sales agents whether from a computer terminal, a smart phone, or any web browser to access the pertinent information on a particular prospect. Agents can view their clients’ energy profiles and quickly access the energy options available to them. The transparency and ease of NEST allows TPC’s agents to select the best power provider for their customers and process the paperwork online in real-time, which enables client acquisition in minutes. This sales portal enables large-scale, rapid sales of deregulated power, as yet unseen in the industry.

For its competitive electricity services, Premier provides innovative and risk-mitigating energy products and solutions to North American wholesale and retail customers. Premier strives to serve its’ customers with diverse products and solutions to meet their energy needs.

In executing this strategy, Premier leverages its core strengths of maintaining and growing strong and diverse supply relationships with retail and wholesale customers, and integrating its expertise in managing physical and financial risks.

2013 Activities

TPC launched its online energy portal NEST on schedule. NEST is built for scalability so that it can be monetized on its own, meaning it can be offered to any deregulated power company as its sales tool. The technology also provides sales management, reporting, verification, and compliance tracking to a degree not seen in the industry to date.

E³ and its growing reseller base have prospected a large number of qualified sales candidates as well as over a dozen strategic partners including Energy Auditors, suppliers, installers, sales organizations and funding sources. These suppliers exponentially increased the number of the product offerings mostly in the LED and other lighting field. The installers not only bring a technical expertise in the implementation of solutions E³ provides its customers but they also bring their list of client’s and an introduction, and the various funding sources can provide financing to meet client’s needs from short-term loans, leases to PACE funding.

Premier completed strategic alliances with Norcal Reps, a national sales rep organization and Western Glass, providing efficiency technology to its 8,000 customers and introducing E3 to these customers. In addition, Premier has acquired the resources of AEON Green Energy Solutions by means of an exclusive employment agreement with its founder, Lenard Tercenio, including its strategic alliances, sales agents, manufacturer, finance and auditor relationships, as well as its client base and pipeline estimated to be worth $2,000,000 in sales in the ensuing 12 months.

E³ is finding success in recruiting LED resellers whose clients have declined an LED sale (mostly on a performance or personal preference basis) and going back to those clients and offering the E-Series technology as a solution for their existing (and preferred) HID lighting. This includes auto dealerships, warehouses, and parking structures, etc.

The energy services business has contributed a small amount of revenues to our overall financial performance as of the period ended December 31, 2013, as the sales cycles for these large projects can be very long. Premier has seen closed sales with a municipality and very large proposals to large prospects such as ports, municipalities, big box stores, and fortune 500 companies.

Strategy and Outlook

Expanding activities in deregulated energy markets through strategic partners. Premier continues to focus on building sales channels through strategic partners that either have, or have access to significant customers to which Premier can offer competitive electricity rates.

Creating and leveraging sales leads from TPC’s deregulated sales efforts to drive sales opportunities for the demand management business. As TPC continues to build its commercial and business customer base, it informs these customers that in addition to financial savings that they can achieve through the negotiation of more competitive electricity rates, Energy Efficiency Experts (“E³”) can also provide energy savings through the installation of lighting, and other building envelope technologies.

Focusing on building channel sales partners for E3. Premier has established strategic partners in key growth markets that advocate and introduce our lighting and related demand management technologies to their customer base. Premier intends to continue to build and develop these channel partnerships both domestically and internationally.

Remaining technology and supplier independent. Premier believes that it can best serve our customers by maintaining independent in both our supplier and technology partnerships, which enables us to focus on providing the most appropriate and effective solution to meet our customers’ needs and financial objectives.

Provide funding sources to enable our clients to adopt new technology. Premier believes it can offer a wide range of funding options which will allow its’ clients to structure the finances to best suit their needs. From 100% no money down, to straight purchases, E³ has available to it a number of strategic financial partners and programs to facilitate a quick sale. In addition, the Company has resources to maximize tax credits and incentives for Premier’s clients.

Known Trends and Uncertainties Affecting Our Business

Market Volatility. Management believes that the market for energy efficiency will continue to grow, and Premier will increase penetration in this market, and that revenue will continue to increase over time. Continued fiscal uncertainty has and may continue to contribute to a lengthening of our sales cycle for both municipal and commercial customers.

Long and Variable Selling Cycle for E³ Business. The sales, design and implementation process for energy efficiency projects can take from several months to 36 months. Existing and potential customers generally follow extended budgeting and procurement processes, and sometimes must engage in regulatory approval processes. This extended sales process requires the dedication of significant time by sales and management personnel and the use of significant financial resources, with no certainty of success or recovery of related expenses. All of these factors can contribute to fluctuations in quarterly financial performance and increase the likelihood that operating results in any particular quarter may fall below investor expectations.

Revenue

Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $1,804,980 compared to zero for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase was due to the acquisition of The Power Company in 2013.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of goods sold for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $39,214 compared to zero for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase was due to products sold by E3 in 2013. Revenue generated by The Power Company had no costs of goods sold.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 were $6,955,779, compared to $1,357,165 for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase in expenses during 2013 was mainly due to an increase of expenses of $2,754,124 related to the operations of The Power Company which did not exist in 2012, stock compensation of $2,073,115, and professional fees of $1,822,033.

Net Loss

For the year ended December 31, 2013, Premier had a net loss of $4,004,957 as compared to a net loss of $2,115,372 for the year ended December 31, 2012. Premier’s accumulated deficit as of December 31, 2013 was $13,146,885. These conditions raise substantial doubt about Premier’s ability to continue as a going concern over the next twelve months.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During the year ended December 31, 2013, cash flow from operations were not sufficient to meet operating commitments. Cash flow from operations are expected to be insufficient to meet operating commitments throughout the remainder of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014.

As of December 31, 2013, working capital was $682,793 and cash was $781,569 while at December 31, 2012 working capital was $(219,204) and cash was $44,311. The increase in working capital is primarily attributable to the on-going sale of common stock. Working capital is not expected to increase through revenues generated by Premier’s subsidiaries during the balance of this year.

Net cash used in or provided by operating, investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2013			2012
Net cash (used) in operating activities	$	(2,961,812	)		(1,477,138	)
Net cash (used) in investing activities	$	(21,109	)		(84,070	)
Net cash provided by financing activities	$	3,720,180			1,345,571

The changes in net cash used in operating activities are attributable to net income adjusted for non-cash charges as presented in the statements of cash flows and changes in working capital as discussed above. Net cash provided by financing activities relates primarily to cash received from sales of common stock.

Going Concern

The Company has sustained net losses of $13,146,885 since inception additional funding may be required to sustain operations and satisfy contractual obligations for planned operations. The ability to establish the Company as a going concern may be dependent upon obtaining additional funding in order to finance planned operations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated balance sheets include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. The consolidated statements of operations include the Company’s accounts and the accounts of its subsidiaries from the date of acquisition. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

In preparing these consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates and assumptions included in our consolidated financial statements relate to the valuation of long-lived assets, estimates of sales returns, inventory reserves and accruals for potential liabilities, and valuation assumptions related to equity instruments and share based compensation.

Revenue

Revenue is recognized on the sale of a product when the product is shipped, which is when the risk of loss transfers to our customers, and collection of the sale is reasonably assured. A product is not shipped without an order from the customer and the completion of credit acceptance procedures. The majority of our sales are cash or credit card; however, we occasionally extend terms to our customers. Accounts receivable are reviewed periodically for collectability. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, we did not maintain a reserve for bad debt, which are minimal based upon our historical experience.

Sales Returns

We allow customers to return defective products when they meet certain established criteria as outlined in our sales terms and conditions. It is our practice to regularly review and revise, when deemed necessary, our estimates of sales returns, which are based primarily on actual historical return rates. We record estimated sales returns as reductions to sales, and accounts receivable. Returned products which are recorded as inventory are valued based upon the amount we expect to realize upon its subsequent disposition. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, there was no reserve for sales returns, which are minimal based upon our historical experience.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the consolidated statements of operations. For stock-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses a weighted average Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model to value the derivative instruments at inception and on subsequent valuation dates. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date. As of December 31, 2012, the Company no longer has derivative financial instruments.

Stock Based Compensation

We periodically issue stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in non-capital raising transactions for services and for financing costs. We account for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to employees based on Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation”, whereas the award is measured at its fair value at the date of grant and is amortized ratably over the vesting period. We account for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to non-employees in accordance with ASC Topic 505, “Equity”, whereas the value of the stock compensation is based upon the measurement date as determined at either (a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or (b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards Adopted

Effective January 2012, the Company adopted ASU No. 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) of Fair Value Measurement – Topic 820 (ASU 2-11-04).” ASU 2011-04 represents the converged guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) on fair value measurement. A variety of measures are included in the update intended to either clarify existing fair value measurement requirements, change particular principles requirements for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. For many of the requirements, the FASB does not intend to change the application of existing requirements under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2011-04 was effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Effective January 2012, the Company adopted ASU No. 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05)”. ASU 2011-05 is intended to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income and to facilitate convergence of accounting guidance in this area with that of the IASB. The amendments require that all non-owner changes in shareholders’ equity be presented in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05 (ASU 2011-12).” ASU 2011-12 defers the provisions of ASU 2011-05 that require the presentation of reclassification adjustments on the face of both the statement of income and statement of other comprehensive income. Amendments under ASU 2011-05 that were not deferred under ASU 2011-12 will be applied retrospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Not Yet Adopted

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-04, “Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date.” The amendments in ASU 2013-04 provide guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this Update is fixed at the reporting date, except for obligations addressed within existing guidance in U.S. GAAP. The guidance requires an entity to measure those obligations as the sum of the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. The guidance in this Update also requires an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation as well as other information about those obligations. The amendments in this standard are effective retrospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. We are evaluating the effect, if any, adoption of ASU No. 2013-04 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, “Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity.” The amendments in ASU No. 2013-05 resolve the diversity in practice about whether Subtopic 810-10, Consolidation—Overall, or Subtopic 830-30, Foreign Currency Matters—Translation of Financial Statements, applies to the release of the cumulative translation adjustment into net income when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business (other than a sale of in substance real estate or conveyance of oil and gas mineral rights) within a foreign entity. In addition, the amendments in this Update resolve the diversity in practice for the treatment of business combinations achieved in stages (sometimes also referred to as step acquisitions) involving a foreign entity. The amendments in this standard are effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods within those years, beginning December 15, 2013. We are evaluating the effect, if any, adoption of ASU No. 2013-05 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In April 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-07, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Top 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting.” The objective of ASU No. 2013-07 is to clarify when an entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting and to provide principles for the measurement of assets and liabilities under the liquidation basis of accounting, as well as any required disclosures. The amendments in this standard is effective prospectively for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. We are evaluating the effect, if any, adoption of ASU No. 2013-07 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the AICPA, and the SEC did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on our present or future consolidated financial statements.

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

Premier Holding Corporation.

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Premier Holding Corporation (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits include examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the result of their consolidated operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

As discussed in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, during the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company made payments to Nexalin Technology. Nexalin Technology is in an unrelated business to the Company, and Mr. Letcavage is its president and a shareholder. In addition, the Company has also made payments to iCapital Advisory, which Mr. Letcavages serve as President.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred an accumulated deficit of $13,146,885 from inception to December 31, 2013. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to this matter are described in Note 3. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/Anton & Chia, LLP

April 15, 2014

Newport Beach, CA

F-1

PREMIER HOLDING CORPORATION

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	December 31,
	2013			2012
Assets
Current assets:
Cash	$	781,569		$	44,311
Accounts receivable		438,976			–
Prepaid expenses		13,134			15,467

Total current assets		1,233,679			59,778

Notes receivable		869,000			–
Vehicles, net		19,350			–
Intangible assets, net		201,366			269,980
Goodwill		4,555,750			138,000
Other assets		–			52,500
Total Assets	$	6,879,145		$	520,258

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	315,063		$	42,746
Accrued commissions		117,685			–
Related party payable		86,138			120,098
Note payable		32,000			–
Liabilities of discontinued operations		–			116,138
Total current liabilities		550,886			278,982

Stockholders’ Equity:
Common stock, par value $.0001, 450,000,000 shares authorized, 151, 003, 328 and 55,794,549 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.		15,101			5,580
Common Stock Payable		–			210,000
Additional Paid-in-Capital		19,639,399			9,167,625
Accumulated deficit		(13,146,885	)		(9,141,928	)
Total Premier Holding Corporation's Equity		6,507,615			241,276
Non-controlling interest		(179,356	)		–
Total Stockholder's Equity		6,328,259			241,276
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	6,879,145		$	520,258

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-2

PREMIER HOLDING CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012

	December 31,
	2013			2012
Revenues	$	1,804,980		$	–
Cost of Sales		39,214			–
Gross Profit		1,765,766			–

Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative		6,955,779			1,357,165
Total operating expenses		6,955,779			1,357,165
Operating loss		(5,190,013	)		(1,357,165	)

Other expense:
Interest expense		–			(1,295	)
Total other expense		–			(1,295	)

Loss before income taxes, non-controlling interest, and discontinued operations		(5,190,013	)		(1,358,460	)

Income taxes		–			–

Loss before non-controlling interest and discontinued operations		(5,190,013	)		(1,358,460	)

Income / (Loss) from discontinued operations		985,138			(756,912	)

Income (loss)		(4,204,875	)		(2,115,372	)

Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest		199,918			–

Net loss attributable to Premier Holding Corporation	$	(4,004,957	)	$	(2,115,372	)

Net Loss Attributable to Premier Holding Corporation per share - basic and diluted
Loss attributable to continuing operation	$	(4,990,095	)	$	(1,358,460	)
Net loss per common share — basic and diluted	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.03	)

Net Loss Attributable to Premier Holding Corporation per share - basic and diluted
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations		985,138			(756,912	)
Net income (Loss) per common share from discontinued operations — basic and diluted		0.01			(0.02	)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period		111,847,320			47,892,487

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-3

PREMIER HOLDING CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012

	December 31,
	2013			2012
Operating Activities:
Net loss attributable to Premier Holding Corporation	$	(4,004,957	)	$	(2,115,372	)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operations:
Share based payments issued for services		2,073,115			475,930
Amortization and depreciation expense		70,374			28,589
Imputed Interest expense		–			298
Loss attributable to non-controlling interest of consolidated subsidiary		(199,918	)		–

Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(310,300	)		–
Prepaid expenses		2,334			(15,467	)
Other assets		52,500			–
Accounts payable		340,178			32,746
Net cash provided by discontinued operation		(985,138	)		–
Accrued expenses		–			116,138
Net cash used in operating activities		(2,961,812	)		(1,477,138	)


Investing activities:
Purchase of vehicle		(21,109	)		–
Cash paid for acquisition of Active ES		–			(31,570	)
Payments for Investment in the Power Company					(52,500	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(21,109	)		(84,070	)

Financing activities:
Advance from related party payable		–			120,098
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		3,698,180			1,230,473
Proceeds / payments - notes payable		22,000			(5,000	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		3,720,180			1,345,571

Net increase (decrease) in cash		737,259			(215,637	)

Cash at beginning of period		44,311			259,948

Cash at end of period	$	781,570		$	44,311

Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities
Common stock issued for acquired assets	$	4,500,000		$	390,000

Note receivable related to sale of subsidiary	$	869,000		$	–
Supplemental Cash flow Information
Interest Paid	$	–		$	–
Income taxes paid	$	–		$	–

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4

PREMIER HOLDING CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Shareholder's Equity

	Common Stock			Additional Paid-in		Common Stock			Minority Interest in			Accumulated			Deficit Accumulated During Development
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Payable			Subsidiary			Deficit			Stage			Total
Balance as of December 31, 2011	44,007,020	$	4,401	$	7,282,103	$	–					$	(7,026,556	)	$	(3,293,586	)	$	259,948
Common Stock Options & Warrants issued for services					115,930														115,930
Common Stock issued after exercise of Warrants	375,000		38		4,420														4,458
Common Stock issued for services	2,740,000		274		359,726														360,000
Common Stock issued for cash	7,922,529		792		1,225,223														1,226,015
Common Stock issued for acquisition of Active ES	750,000		75		179,925														180,000
Common Stock payable for acquisition of Active ES							210,000												210,000
Imputed interest					298														298
Net loss													(2,115,372	)		(2,115,372	)		(2,115,372	)
Balance, December 31, 2012	55,794,549		5,580		9,167,625		210,000						(9,141,928	)		(5,408,958	)		241,277
Common Stock issued for services	10,639,362		1,064		2,034,369														2,035,433
Common Stock Options & Warrants issued for services					37,682														37,682
Common Stock issued for cash	45,337,731		4,534		3,107,205														3,111,739
Common Stock issued for cash with warrants	8,356,686		836		585,606														586,441
Minority Interest in Subsidiary										20,562									20,562
Stock issued to Active ES	875,000		88		209,912		(210,000	)											0
Shares for TPC	30,000,000		3,000		4,497,000														4,500,000
Net Loss										(199,918	)		(4,004,957	)					(4,204,875	)
Balance December 31, 2013	151,003,328	$	15,101	$	19,639,399	$	–		$	(179,356	)	$	(13,146,885	)	($	5,408,958	)	$	6,328,259

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5

PREMIER HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 – DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Premier Holding Corporation (“Premier”) is devoting substantially all of its efforts to establishing energy services companies. Premier was organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on October 18, 1971 under the name of Mr. Nevada, Inc. On November 13, 2008, Premier filed a Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation with the State of Nevada Secretary of State to change its name from OVM International Holding Corporation to Premier Holding Corporation. These businesses, which were started during 2012, are primarily focused on providing small and large-scale commercial companies with energy solutions to reduce the costs of utilities through consultations as well as product sales to complete those installations via shipment from inventory on hand to the customer site. Premier is organized with a holding company structure such that Premier provides financial and management expertise, which includes access to capital, financing, legal, insurance, mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures and management strategies.

Premier’s wholly owned subsidiary Energy Efficiency Experts (“E3”) is a U.S. energy service company based in the Chicago area of Illinois offering energy efficiency products and services to commercial middle market companies, Fortune 500 brands, developers and management companies of large scale residential developments as well as the general public so long as the product and the solutions fit the market segment.. E³’s business is focused as an integrator of clean technology solutions in the U.S., with strategic expansion plans in Latin America, Asia and Europe. E³’s core business expects to deliver green solutions, branded specifically as E³, which include best-of-class alternative energy technology portfolio, and energy reduction technologies in smart lighting controls, LED lighting, battery storage power plants, energy and power control management systems, and other clean technologies specific to its market.

On February 28, 2013, Premier acquired an 80% interest in The Power Company USA, LLC (“TPC”) for 30,000,000 shares of Premier’s common stock valued at $4,500,000. TPC is based is a deregulated power broker which was originally formed as an Illinois limited liability company on November 29, 2010. TPC brokers power to both residential and commercial users in the 12 states that allow the distribution of deregulated power.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying audited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP").

Principles of Consolidation

The audited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Premier Holding Corporation, E3 and the accounts of THE POWER COMPANY USA, LLC as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

F-6

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include short-term cash investments that have an initial maturity of 90 days or less. The Company had no cash equivalents as of and December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s wholly owned Energy Efficiency Experts, Inc. and The Power Company USA, LLC. offer renewable energy production and energy efficiency products and services to both commercial middle market companies as well as residential customers. In accordance with the requirements of ASC 605-10-599, the Company recognizes revenue when (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists (contracts); (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the seller’s price is fixed or determinable (per the customer’s contract); and (4) collectability is reasonably assured (based upon our credit policy). When consultations are provided to customers, the revenue is recognized at the completion of the service when collectability is reasonably assured. For products sold to customers revenue is recognized when title has passed to the customer and collectability is reasonably assured; and no further efforts are required. Revenue generated from commercial and residential electricity usage is supported by annual (or longer) contracts with users, which the Company earns commissions from power suppliers when executed. The commission revenue is recognized when the contract is signed, and the performance is completed, with an appropriate allowance for estimates cancellation.

Accounts Receivable

All accounts receivable are due thirty (30) days from the date billed. If the funds are not received within thirty (30) days the customer is contacted to arrange payment. The Company uses the allowance method to account for uncollectable accounts receivable. All accounts were considered collectible as of December 31, 2013 and no allowance for bad debts was considered necessary.

Non-controlling Interest

Non-controlling interests in our subsidiary is recorded as a component of our equity, separate from the parent’s equity. Purchase or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change of control are accounted for as equity transactions. Results of operations attributable to the non-controlling interest are included in our consolidated results of operations and, upon loss of control, the interest sold, as well as interest retained, if any, will be reported at fair value with any gain or loss recognized in earnings.

Earnings/Loss Per Share

The Company has adopted the FASB ASC Topic 260 regarding earnings / loss per share, which provides for calculation of “basic” and “diluted” earnings / loss per share. Basic earnings / loss per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income / loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings / loss per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share in the earnings of an entity similar to fully diluted earnings / loss per share.

Income Tax

Deferred income tax is provided for differences between the bases of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting. A deferred tax asset, subject to a valuation allowance, is recognized for estimated future tax benefits of tax-basis operating losses being carried forward. Income taxes are provided based upon the liability method of accounting pursuant to the FASB ASC Topic 740-10-30 concerning Income Taxes. Under this approach, deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end. A valuation allowance is recorded against the deferred tax asset if management does not believe the Company has met the “more likely than not” standard imposed by the FASB ASC Topic 740-10-30 concerning Income Taxes to allow recognition of such an asset.

Stock-Based Compensation

F-7

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The Company periodically reviews the carrying value of intangible assets not subject to amortization, including goodwill, to determine whether impairment may exist. Goodwill and certain intangible assets are assessed annually, or when certain triggering events occur, for impairment using fair value measurement techniques. These events could include a significant change in the business climate, legal factors, a decline in operating performance, competition, sale or disposition of a significant portion of the business, or other factors. Specifically, goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test is used to identify potential impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. Premier uses level 3 inputs and a discounted cash flow methodology to estimate the fair value of a reporting unit. A discounted cash flow analysis requires one to make various judgmental assumptions including assumptions about future cash flows, growth rates, and discount rates. The assumptions about future cash flows and growth rates are based on the Company’s budget and long-term plans. Discount rate assumptions are based on an assessment of the risk inherent in the respective reporting units. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. That is, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid to acquire the reporting unit.

As of December 31, 2013, amortizable intangible assets consist of patents, trade names, trademarks, domain names, website emails, and non-compete agreements, and contracts with suppliers and customers. See Note 4 for further information regarding the acquisition and amortization of these intangible assets. These intangibles are being amortized on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives, two to ten years.

Fair Value Measurements

On January 1, 2011, Premier adopted guidance which defines fair value, establishes a framework for using fair value to measure financial assets and liabilities on a recurring basis, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Beginning on January 1, 2011, Premier also applied the guidance to non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, which includes goodwill and intangible assets. The guidance establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of Premier. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect Premier’s assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of the inputs as follows:

Level 1 - Valuation is based upon unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that Premier has the ability to access.

Level 2 - Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets; or valuations based on models where the significant inputs are observable in the market.

Level 3 - Valuation is based on models where significant inputs are not observable. The unobservable inputs reflect Premier's own assumptions about the inputs that market participants would use.

F-8

Premier’s financial instruments consist of cash, accounts receivable, note receivable, accounts payable, related party payable and accrued liabilities. The estimated fair value of cash, accounts receivable, note receivable, accounts payable, related party payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying amounts due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Certain non-financial assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Accordingly, these assets are not measured and adjusted to fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to periodic impairment tests. These items primarily include long-lived assets, goodwill and other intangible assets.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company maintains its cash in multiple financial institutions. The Company limits the amount of credit exposure to each individual financial institution and places its temporary cash into investments of high credit quality with a financial institution that exceeds federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses related to these balances and believes its credit risk to be minimal.

Gain from Discontinued Operations

Gain from discontinued operations of $985,138 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 consists of the sale of both intangible assets in the form of sales opportunities and leads, and the assumption of liabilities from the discontinued operations to WEPOWER ECO Corp (an unrelated company). The gain is based upon the estimated value of the $5,000,000 note received in the transaction. The provisional amounts are subject to revision until the evaluations are completed to the extent that additional information is obtained about the facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date. The preliminary appraised value of the note is $869,000; $116,138 consists of liabilities which were assumed by the acquirer in the transaction.

RECENTLY ISSUED AND ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Adopted

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force) and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements.

F-9

NOTE 3 – GOING CONCERN

The Company has sustained operating losses of $13,146,885 since inception. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent on management’s ability to develop profitable operations, and / or obtain additional financing from its stockholders and / or other third parties.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern; however, the above conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to do so. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

If management projections are not met, the Company may have to reduce its operating expenses and to seek additional funding through debt and/or equity offerings.

NOTE 4 – ACQUISITIONS & GOODWILL

Active ES Lighting Controls, Inc. Acquisition

On July 25, 2012, Premier acquired the assets of the Active ES Lighting Controls, Inc. (“AES”) business by completing the transactions contemplated under an asset purchase agreement dated July 25, 2012 (the “Agreement”) with AES. In accordance with the terms of the Agreement, the purchase price for the acquisition consisted of the following components: (i) 750,000 shares of Premier’s common stock issued at closing; (ii) $30,000 in cash paid at closing; (iii) a payable, due December 31, 2012, of Premier in the principal amount of $15,000; (v) contingent shares payable (payable 12 months after closing of the transaction) of a number of shares of common stock of Premier equal to 875,000 shares based upon the following contingencies:

175,000 shares of common stock if the volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) is below $2.00 for 30 consecutive trading days during the 12 months following the contingent period (begins after stock received in transaction has had restricted legend (section 144) removed and continues for nine months)

175,000 shares of common stock if the VWAP is below $1.00 for 60 consecutive trading days during the contingent period;

175,000 shares of common stock if the VWAP is below $0.80 for 60 consecutive trading days during the contingent period;

175,000 shares of common stock if the VWAP is below $0.60 for 60 consecutive trading days during the contingent period;

175,000 shares of common stock if the VWAP is below $0.40 for 60 consecutive trading days during the contingent period;

As of December 31, 2012, the dollar value of the contingent shares payable is $210,000, which is recorded as a common stock payable on the accompanying balance sheet. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company issued all the 875,000 shares to AES.

The acquisition has been accounted for as an asset purchase and the Company valued all assets and liabilities acquired at their fair values on the date of acquisition.

F-10

As of December 31, 2012, the marketing results of operations of AES products are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. The allocation of the purchase price to assets and liabilities based upon fair value determinations was as follows:

IP/Technology – patents	$	167,570
Non-compete agreement		76,000
Trademarks & Service Marks		55,000
Goodwill		138,000
Total purchase price	$	436,570

The purchase price consideration consisted of the following:

Cash	$	31,570
Note Payable		15,000
Common Stock		180,000
Common Stock Payable		210,000
Total purchase price	$	436,570

Estimated Useful Lives of Acquired Intangibles

The estimated useful lives (years) of the acquired intangibles are as follows

	Useful Life
IP/Technology - Patents		5
Non-compete Agreement		10
Trademarks & Service Marks		2
Goodwill		N/A

The Power Company USA, LLC Share Exchange

On February 28, 2013 Premier acquired 80% of the outstanding membership units of the The Power Company USA, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company (“TPC” or “The Power Company”), a deregulated power broker in Illinois for thirty million 30,000,000 shares of Premier’s common stock valued at $4,500,000. The Power Company had over 14,000 residential and commercial customers. The initial accounting for the business combination is not complete because the evaluations necessary to assess the fair values of certain net assets acquired and the amount of goodwill to be recognized are still in process. The provisional amounts are subject to revision until the evaluations are completed to the extent that additional information is obtained about the facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date. Any changes to the fair value assessments will affect the acquisition-date fair value of goodwill. The primary reason for acquisition of TPC at the time of the acquisition and factors that make up the goodwill recognized was TPC as a marketing firm in the energy business, and PRHL as an operator, supplier, and manager of energy related company. PRHL management believed that the skills and experience provided by the management and staff of TPC are a competitive advantage to PRHL as we continue to expand our footprint in the energy management business

The total purchase price for the The Power Company USA, LLC acquisition was allocated as follows:

Goodwill	$	4,500,000
Total assets acquired	$	4,500,000
The Purchase price consists of the following:
Common Stock	$	4,500,000
Total purchase price	$	4,500,000

For the year ended December 31, 2013, $250,000 of amortization expense of goodwill is tax deductible,

	Revenue		Earnings
Actual from 2/28/2013–12/31/2013	$	1,755,211	$	(925,023	)
Supplemental pro forma from 1/1/2013-12/31/2013	$	2,001,828	$	(5,279,635	)
Supplemental pro forma for 1/1/2012-12/31/2012	$	0	$	(1,414,741	)

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2013, are as follows:

Balance as of January 1, 2013
Goodwill - Active ES	$	138,000
Accumulated impairment losses		–
		138,000
Goodwill acquired during the year - TPC		4,500,000
Impairment losses		–
Goodwill related to 20% non-controlling interest		(82,250	)

Balance as of December 31, 2013
Goodwill		4,555,750
Accumulated impairment losses		–
	$	4,555,750

The pro forma information below present statements of operations data as if the acquisition of TPC took place on January 1, 2012.

PREMIER HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

	2013			2012
	Pro Forma			Pro Forma
Revenue		2,001,828			–

Cost of Sales		39,214			–
		–			–
Gross Profit		1,962,614			–

Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative		7,242,249			1,413,446
Total operating expenses		7,242,249			1,413,446
Loss from operations		(5,279,635	)		(1,413,446	)

Other income (expenses):
Interest expense		–			(1,295	)
Total non-operating expenses		–			(1,295	)

Income/(Loss) from operations before income taxes, non-controlling interest, and discontinued operations		(5,279,635	)		(1,414,741	)

Income taxes		–			–

Income/(Loss) before non-controlling interest and discontinued operations		(5,279,635	)		(1,414,741	)

Net Income/(Loss) attributable to non-controlling interest		217,842			11,256

Income/ Loss from discontinued operations		985,138			(756,912	)

Net Profit (Loss) attributable to Premier Holding Corporation	$	(4,076,655	)	$	(2,160,397	)

Net loss from continuing operations		(5,061,793	)		(1,403,485	)

F-11

NOTE 5 – INTANGIBLES ASSETS, NET

The following table presents details of the Company’s total purchased intangible assets as of December 31, 2013:

For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company’s recorded amortization expense related to the purchased intangibles of $51,461 and $0, respectively.

	Balance 12/31/2012		Additions		Amortization			Impairment		Balance 12/31/2013

IP/Technology – Patents	$	153,607	$	–	$	(33,515	)	$	–	$	120,092
Non-compete Agreement		72,832		–		(7,600	)		–		65,232
Trademarks & Service Marks		43,542		–		(27,500	)		–		16,042

	$	269,980	$	–	$	(68,615	)	$	–	$	201,366

NOTE 6 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the year ended December 31, 2013, Mr. Letcavage (directly or through related entities) was paid $240,000 as compensation for his role as our CEO and CFO, and $37,500 for consulting, for a total of $277,500, and $661,319 for contract labor, including payments to Nexalin Technology specifically for the direct costs related to independent contractors performing sales lead generation (Nexalin Technology is in an unrelated business to the Company, and Mr. Letcavage is its president and shareholder), which were not reported as income. In addition, the Company has also paid $28,787 to iCapital Advisory for consulting services received during the year 2013, Mr. Letcavage is president and shareholder of iCapital Advisory.

Additionally, we have also reviewed the facts and circumstance of our relationship with Nexalin Technology and iCapital Advisory and have assessed whether these two companies are variable interest entities (VIE). Based on the guidance provided in ASC 810-10-50-5(a), these two companies are not considered VIEs. The Company is not the primary beneficiary, whether those two companies have any income (losses) as of December 31, 2013, it would not be absorbed by Premier Holding Corporation.

NOTE 7 – CAPITAL STOCK TRANSACTIONS

Preferred Stock

On June 3, 2013, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation with the State of Nevada Secretary of State giving it the authority to issue 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.0001 per share.

Common Stock

On February 28, 2013 the company acquired 80% of the outstanding membership units of The Power Company USA, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company (“TPC” or “The Power Company”), for thirty million 30,000,000 shares of Premier’s common stock valued at $4,500,000. This transaction was exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, based upon Section 4(2) for transactions by the issuer not involving any public offering.

On June 3, 2013, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation with the State of Nevada Secretary of State giving it the authority to issue 450,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.0001 per share.

From October 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013, the Company issued 10,639,362 shares of common stock to various consultants for services. A compensation expense of $2,035,433 was recorded during the period ended December 31, 2013.

During the year 2013, the Company entered into several of stock purchase agreements with various investors for sale of 45,337,731 shares of its common stock. The sales closed and cash of an aggregated amount $3,111,739 was received.

During the year 2013, the Company entered into difference series of stock purchase agreements for cash and with warrants attached for a total of 8,356,686 shares of the Company’s common stock for the sale of $586,441.

F-12

Common Stock Options

On February 20, 2013, the Company granted 75,000 stock options to a Director, Woodrow W. Clark II, to purchase shares at $0.25 per share. The options expire February 20, 2016 and vested on the grant date. The total estimated value using the Black-Scholes Model, based on a volatility rate of 468%, expected term of 2 years, risk free rate of 0.42 percent, and a call option value of $0.17, was $12,749. As the stock options were immediately vested, the stock expensed was $12,749 on that date and for the year ended December 31, 2013.

On February 20, 2013, the Company granted 75,000 stock options to a Director, Lane Harrison to purchase shares at $0.25 per share. The options expire February 20, 2016 and vested on the grant date. The total estimated value using the Black-Scholes Model, based on a volatility rate of 468%, expected term of 2 years, risk free rate of 0.42 percent, and a call option value of $0.17, was $12,749. As the stock options were immediately vested, the stock expensed was $12,749 on that date and for the year ended December 31, 2013.

On April 9, 2013, the Company modified the 75,000 stock options granted to a Director, Lane Harrison on February 20, 2013, to purchase shares at $0.25 per share, the option was modified entitling Mr. Harrison to purchase 100,000 shares at $0.10, on or before April 30, 2015. The stock option provided for cashless exercise term. The total estimated value using the Black-Scholes Model, based on a volatility rate of 470%, expected term of 2 years, risk free rate of 0.42 percent, and a call option value of $0.0882, was $10,285. The stock expensed was $10,285 on that date and for the year ended December 31, 2013.

On April 9, 2013, the Company modified the 75,000 stock options granted to a Director, Woodrow Clark on February 20, 2013, to purchase shares at $0.25 per share, the option was modified entitling Mr. Clark to purchase 100,000 shares at $0.10, on or before April 30, 2015. The stock option provided for cashless exercise term. The total estimated value using the Black-Scholes Model, based on a volatility rate of 470%, expected term of 2 years, risk free rate of 0.42 percent, and a call option value of $0.0882, was $10,287. The stock expensed was $10,287 on that date and for the year ended December 31, 2013.

A summary of option activity as of December 31, 2013 and changes during the year ended is presented below:

	Number Outstanding		Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)

Outstanding at January 1, 2013		150,000	$	0.33		2.25

Granted		50,000		0.25		4.00
Exercised		–		–		–
Canceled/forfeited/expired						–
Outstanding at December 31, 2013		200,000	$	0.25		3.61

Options nonvested and exercisable at December 31, 2013		–		–		–
Options vested and exercisable at December 31, 2013		200,000	$	0.25		3.61

Common Stock Warrants

During the year 2013, the Company has issued 8,356,686 shares of common stock with warrants attached for an aggregated price of $586,441 and the terms of the subscription were: for each 4 shares purchased, the purchaser received 2 warrants, one warrant with future price of $0.15 and a second warrant with a future price of $0.20, both warrants expire two years from the closing date (1,071,847 at $0.15 and 1,071,847 at $0.20). The total estimated value using the Black-Scholes model.

On December 31, 2013, 650,000 warrants were issued to Rick Weed with an exercise price of $0.225. The Company valued these warrants at $146,250, and $17,110 was recognized as expense in 2013.

F-13

A summary of non-employee warrant activity during the year ended as of December 31, 2013 is presented below:

	Number Outstanding		Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)

Outstanding at January 1, 2013		450,000	$	0.57		2.59

Granted		2,793,694		0.175		1.85
Exercised		–		–		–
Canceled/forfeited/expired		450,000		.057		–
Outstanding at December 31, 2013		2,793,694	$	0.175		1.85

Warrants vested and exercisable at December 31, 2013		2,793,694	$	0.175		1.85

NOTE 8 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

The Company acquired assets from WEPOWER, LLC during 2011. WEPOWER, Ecolutions, Inc. was expected to offer clean energy products and services to commercial markets, developers, and management companies of large scale residential developments. In 2012, WEPOWER Ecolutions, Inc was classified as held for sale under the requirements of ASC 360-10-45-9, and therefore, the result of its operations are reported in discontinued operations in accordance with ASC 205-20-45-3. On January 7, 2013, Premier Holding Corporation (“PRHL”), acting through its wholly owned subsidiary, WEPOWER Ecolutions, Inc., completed the sale of assets under an Asset Purchase Agreement with WEPOWER Eco Corp., a newly formed entity, controlled by Kevin B. Donovan, PRHL’s former CEO. PRHL sold certain assets related solar energy, wind power projects, energy efficiency projects in real estate, and fuel efficiency for diesel and gasoline engines for a note payable for $5,000,000, no interest (valuation on the note is $869,000 by using the Enterprise Value with discounted cash flows method) WEPOWER Eco Corp. assumed $116,138 in liabilities, acquired three patents, six trademarks, and twenty-eight contracts. Further, PRHL and WEPOWER Eco Corp. agreed to certain exclusive business opportunities, fifteen exclusive opportunities and nineteen exclusive for nine months. A Mutual General Release between PRHL, WEPOWER Ecolutions, Inc., WEPOWER Eco Corp., and the former directors and officers, Kevin Donovan, Frank Schulte, and Thomas C. Lynch was signed, and executed on January 4, 2013 releasing all parties from all claims, from whatever source.

NOTE 9 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent to the period ended December 31, 2013 the Company entered into a series of stock purchase agreements with accredited investors for the sale of 4,035,350 shares of its common stock, the sales closed and cash of $421,776 was received. Additionally, 24,818 shares of common stock were issued for services. There was no underwriter, no underwriting discounts or commissions, no general solicitation, no advertisement, and resale restrictions were imposed by placing a Rule 144 legend on the certificates. The persons who received securities have such knowledge in business and financial matters that he/she/it is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of the transaction. This transaction was exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, based upon Section 4(2) for transactions by the issuer not involving any public offering.

Subsequent to the period ended December 31, 2013 the Company settled a disagreement with a former employee. In 2013 Brian Manahan alleged a complaint related to shares previously issued in 2012 related to his employment. On March 4, 2014 the parties agreed to a settlement whereby the Company would pay Mr. Manahan $35,000 payable over a period of one year, payment was personally guaranteed by Randall Letcavage. As well, Marvin Winkler agreed to transfer $15,000 in the form of 83,334 common shares of the Company to Mr. Manahan. In return, Mr. Manahan agreed to sell no more than 30,000 shares of the Company’s stock per month through June 30, 2014. Additionally, WePower LLC returned 5,000,000 common shares of the Company previously issued related to the sale of TPC, and in exchange for the promissory note in the face amount of $5,000,000 (and valued at 869,000 on the Company’s financial statements as of December 31, 2013), the Company had returned an additional 2,500,000 common shares.

F-14

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Since inception, there have been no disagreements with Premier’s independent accountants.

In February 2013, Premier retained the accounting services of Anton & Chia, LLP and terminated the accounting services of M&K CPAS, PLLC.

Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, we conducted an evaluation, under supervision and with the participation of management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Disclosure controls and procedures are defined by Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act as controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed with the SEC under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

For the Report of Management on Internal Control and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, see Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Management’s Annual Report on Disclosure Controls and Procedures over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate our disclosure controls and procedures over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act as amended, as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officer and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and includes those policies and procedures that:

Ÿ	Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and any disposition of our assets;
Ÿ	Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
Ÿ	Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, our disclosure controls and procedures over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in our disclosure controls and procedures over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Our management assessed the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992). Based on this assessment, management identified the following three material weaknesses that have caused management to conclude that, as of December 31, 2013, our disclosure controls and procedures, and our disclosure controls and procedures over financial reporting, were not effective at the reasonable assurance level:

1. We do not have written documentation of our disclosure controls and procedures policies and procedures. Written documentation of key our disclosure controls and procedures over financial reporting is a requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act as of the year ending December 31, 2013. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have written documentation of our disclosure controls and procedures and procedures on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

2. We do not have sufficient segregation of duties within accounting functions, which is a basic our disclosure controls and procedures. Due to our size, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

3. We do not have an audit committee as part of our Board of Directors, nor do we have an identified financial expert as an independent member of our Board of Directors.

To address these material weaknesses, management performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that the financial statements included herein fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Accordingly, we believe that the financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding our disclosure controls and procedures over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only our management’s report in this Annual Report.

Remediation of Material Weaknesses

To remediate the material weakness in our documentation, evaluation and testing of our disclosure controls and procedures we plan to engage a third-party firm to assist us in remedying this material weakness once resources become available.

We intend to remedy our material weakness with regard to insufficient segregation of duties by hiring additional employees in order to segregate duties in a manner that establishes effective disclosure controls and procedures once resources become available. We also expect to add to our Board of Directors an independent financial expert, and to form an Audit Committee.

Changes in on Disclosure Controls and Procedures over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our disclosure controls and procedures over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2013 that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our disclosure controls and procedures over financial reporting.

Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

The members of the Board of Directors of Premier serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders, or until their successors have been elected and qualified. The officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.

The current executive officers, key employees and directors of Premier are as follows:

Name	Age	Title
Randall Letcavage	56	CEO/President/CFO/Chairman
Woodrow Clark, PhD	69	Director
Lane Harrison	62	Director

Randall Letcavage

Mr. Letcavage, age 56, was named Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of Premier Holding Corporation. Prior to this he was employed as a consultant by Capital Finance LLC. He brings in excess of 25 years plus of business experience specializing in the financial markets and business consulting and green energy/clean technology. For the past 20 years Mr. Letcavage has been an investment banker widely recognized for individual achievements as well as his role of Founder, Officer and Director of the iCapital Group that includes iCapital Finance Inc, iCapital Advisory LLC and iCap Development LLC (A National “CDE” Community Development Entity – Certified by the U.S Treasury Department). Mr. Letcavage has also held executive positions, invested, and/or operated numerous businesses including related companies in “Power Generation and Power Reduction” – CEO of Ciralight Global Inc, CEO of Green Central Holdings, Consultant and second largest shareholder of publicly traded PRHL which operates Energy Efficiency Experts (E3). Letcavage had been successful in many areas additionally providing millions in Healthcare funding. Mr. Letcavage personally acted as an advisor to municipalities leading millions in industrial bond transactions, while also advising the National Conference of Black Mayors (NCBM; over 800 members all of whose cities may one day be able to offer deregulated power services). Mr. Letcavage served as the Managing Director of NC Capital Markets and as Vice President of The National Capital Companies, Inc. (directing the daily operations of most of its subsidiaries). Mr. Letcavage was formerly the CEO and a majority owner of Capital Access Group. Prior to Capital Access, Mr. Letcavage founded and/or managed several asset management firms, including Valley Forge Capital Holdings and the Marshall Plan, LLC that directed and/or co-managed over $3 billion in assets with former renowned CALPERS (California Pension & Retirement Systems) Manager, Greta Marshall.

Prior to Valley Forge, Mr. Letcavage founded Security America, Inc., an asset management firm based in Grosse Pointe, Michigan. Mr. Letcavage worked with Prudential-Bache running a Joint Venture ―High Net Worth Group (a/k/a Security American, Inc.).

Woodrow Clark, PhD

Dr. Clark, age 69, is a Director of Premier Holding Corporation. Dr. Clark, a long-time advocate for the environment and renewable energy, is an internationally recognized author, lecturer, public speaker and advisor specializing in sustainable communities. Dr. Clark was one of the contributing scientists to the work of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (UNIPCC) which as an organization was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in December 2007.

In 2004, he founded, and now manages, Clark Strategic Partners (CSP), an environmental and renewable energy consulting firm using his political-economic expertise in order to guide, advice and implements public and private clients worldwide – specifically on sustainable smart green communities of all kinds ranging from colleges and universities to shopping malls, office buildings and film studios. Dr. Clarks’ five books and 50+ peer-reviewed articles reflect that concern for global sustainable communities. His last book is Global Energy Innovations (Praeger Press, November 2011) that concerns the “green industrial revolution” (GIR). He explains his work as being the solutions to climate change through public policy, science and technologies, economics and finance. Clark also teaches graduate courses in these areas throughout the USA and internationally. Currently, Clark is Academic Specialist, UCLA Provost Office and Cross-Disciplinary Scholars in Science and Technology.

Prior to launching CSP, Dr. Clark was Senior Advisor on Renewable Energy, Emerging Technologies, and Finance to California Governor Gray Davis from 2000-2003. Before that from 1999-2000, he was a Visiting Professor of Science, Technology and Entrepreneurship at Aalborg University, Denmark, where he was a Fulbright Fellow in 1994. Dr. Clark was the Manager of Strategic Planning for Technology Transfer at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) for the University of California and U.S. Department of Energy, during the 1990s. In 1980, he founded a mass media company in San Francisco, CA, Clark Communications, specializing in the production and distribution of documentary and educational films focused on “social issues” such as “sexual harassment”, “health issues” and older workers along with other topics including books from dramatic current events.

Dr. Clark earned three masters’ degrees from different universities in Illinois and his Ph.D. at University of California, Berkeley.

Lane Harrison

Lane Harrison, age 62, is a Director of Premier Holding Corporation. Mr. Harrison is Founder and President of Affluent and Corporate Insurance Services, Inc. and Capital Preservation Insurance Services, Inc. The firms provide insurance and advanced consulting services to professional advisors, corporations, small business owners and high net worth families. Mr. Harrison has over 30 years of business consulting and sale/marketing experience. He has lectured extensively to the professional advisor community. In addition, Mr. Harrison advised large multi-national corporations such as Bicoastal Corporation, (Formerly Singer Corp.) where he served as Director, and Bicoastal Financial Corporation, serving as President/Director. Mr. Harrison is a graduate of Salem State College with a Bachelor of Arts in Social Welfare.

Significant Employees

None.

Family Relationships

None.

Voting Arrangements

None.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires that our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities, file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Executive officers, directors and greater-than-ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on our review of the copies of the forms received by us and written representations from certain reporting persons that they have complied with the relevant filing requirements, we believe that, during the year ended December 31, 2013, none of our executive officers, directors and greater-than-ten percent stockholders except Randall Letcavage complied with Section 16(a) filing requirements.

Committees of the Board of Directors

We do not have a separately designated audit, compensation or nominating committee of our Board and the functions customarily delegated to these committees are performed by our full Board. We are not a “listed company” under SEC rules and are therefore not required to have separate committees comprised of independent directors. The Company has, however, determined that Bob Kurilko is “independent” as that term is defined in Section 5605 of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules as required by the NASDAQ Stock Market.

The Board does not have a nominations committee because the Board does not believe that a defined policy with regard to the consideration of candidates recommended by stockholders is necessary at this time because our Board adequately performs the functions of such committee. There are no specific minimum qualifications that the Board believes must be met by a candidate recommended by the Board. Currently, the entire Board decides on nominees, on the recommendation of any member of the Board, followed by the Board’s review of the candidates’ resumes and interviews of candidates. Based on the information gathered, the Board then makes a decision on whether to recommend the candidates as nominees for director. We do not pay any fee to any third party or parties to identify or evaluate or assist in identifying or evaluating potential nominees.

The Board does not have an audit committee. However, for certain purposes of the rules and regulations of the SEC and in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the our Board is deemed to be its audit committee and as such functions as an audit committee and performs some of the same functions as an audit committee including: (i) selection and oversight of our independent accountant; (ii) establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal controls and auditing matters; and (iii) engaging outside advisors. Our Board has determined that its members do not include a person who is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the rules and regulations of the SEC. Our Board has determined that each of its members is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements and has substantial business experience that results in that member’s financial sophistication. Accordingly, our Board believes that each of its members have the sufficient knowledge and experience necessary to fulfill the duties and obligations that an audit committee would have.

The Board does not have a compensation committee because the Board believes that it is not necessary to have a compensation committee at this time because our Board adequately performs the functions of such committee.

Stockholder Communications

Our Board has determined not to adopt a formal methodology for communications from stockholders on the belief that any communication would be brought to the Board’s attention by our sole officer, Randall Letcavage.

Meetings of the Board of Directors and Committees

Our Board took a number of actions by written consent of all of the directors during the year ended December 31, 2013. Such actions by the written consent of all directors are, according to Nevada corporate law and our bylaws, valid and effective as if they had been passed at a meeting of the directors duly called and held. The Board held approximately two general meetings during 2013. Each director attended at least 75% of all the meetings of the Board in 2013. While the Company has not established a policy with respect to members of the Board attending annual meetings, each director is encouraged to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. We did not hold an annual meeting of security holders during our last fiscal year. No compensation has been paid to our directors for attendance at any meetings during the last fiscal year.

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

We do not separate the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board because we believe that Randall Letcavage adequately performs such roles. The benefits of Mr. Letcavage’s leadership of the Board stem from his experience in managing small to medium sized businesses and his involvement in the hydroponics industry, which provide a unique understanding of our culture and business. Also, serving as both the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board ensures that a constant flow of Company-related information is available between the Board and our senior management. This flow of communication enables Mr. Letcavage to identify issues, proposals, strategies and other considerations for future Board discussions and to assume the lead in many of the resulting discussions during Board meetings. Our Board has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. A fundamental part of risk management is not only understanding the risks we face and what steps management is taking to manage those risks, but also understanding what level of risk is appropriate for us. The involvement of the Board in setting our business strategy is a key part of its assessment of risk management and the determination of what constitutes our appropriate level of risk. The Board regularly discusses with management our major risk exposures, their potential impact on us and the steps taken to manage these risks. In addition, the Board may retain, on such terms as determined by the Board, in its sole discretion, independent legal, financial and other consultants and advisors to advise and assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities.

Code of Ethics

We have not adopted a corporate code of ethics due to limited funds. We expect to adopt a Code of Ethics during this year

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table provides information as to cash compensation of all officers of Premier, for each of Premier’s last two fiscal years.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name & Position

Fiscal Year

Salary ($)

Stock Awards ($)

Option Awards ($)

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation Earnings ($)

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)

All Other Compensation ($)

Total ($)

Randall Letcavage (1)

2013

240,000

–

66,287

306,281

CEO & CFO

2012

40,000

–

40,000

Nancy Nguyen

2013

1,500

–

1,500

Former Secretary

2012

74,000

60,000

–

134,000

Kevin Donovan

2013

–

Former CEO

2012

82,500

60,000

–

142,500

	1.	During the year ended December 31, 2013, Mr. Letcavage (directly or through related entities) was paid $240,000 as compensation for his role as our CEO and CFO, and $37,500 for consulting, for a total of $277,500, and $661,319 for contract labor, including payments to Nexalin Technology specifically for the direct costs related to independent contractors performing sales lead generation (Nexalin Technology is in an unrelated business to the Company, and Mr. Letcavage is its president), which was not reported as income.
	2.	During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company has paid $66,287 to iCapital Advisory for consulting services, a related party entity which Mr. Letcavage is the president of the Company.

There are no outstanding equity awards or options to officers issued or outstanding.

Employment Contracts

The Company has not entered into any employment agreements.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table provides information regarding outstanding options held by our named executive officers as of the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Name

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)

Option Exercise Price ($)

Option expiration date

Number of shares or units of stock that have not vested (#)

Market value of shares of units of stock that have not vested ($)

Equity incentive plan awards: Number of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested (#)

Equity incentive plan awards: Market or payout value of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested ($)

Grisham Bobby

75,000

–

0.40

6/30/15

–

Consultant

Lynch Thomas

75,000

–

0.25

6/30/15

–

Consultant

Clark Woodrow

75,000

–

0.25

6/30/15

–

Director

Clark Woodrow

100,000

–

0.10

4/30/15

–

Director

Lane Harrison

100,000

–

0.10

4/30/15

–

Director

None of the executive officers listed in the above table exercised options during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Name & Position	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation Earnings ($)	Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Woodrow Clark, PhD	-	-	10,285	-	-	-	10,285
Lane Harrison	-	-	10,285	-	-	-	10,285

Item 12. SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

The following table presents information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock by the following persons as of April 11, 2014: (i) each executive officer and director, (ii) all executive officers and directors as a group and (iii) each stockholder known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock (not taking into account contractual restrictions on beneficial ownership.)

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Unless otherwise indicated below, to our knowledge, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable. Shares of our common stock subject to options or warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 11, 2014 are deemed to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding the options for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

The information presented in this table is based on 148,697,016 shares of our common stock outstanding on April 11, 2014.


Name of Beneficial Owner	Number of Shares Beneficially Owned	Percentage Owned (%)	Notes
Randall Letcavage	6,967,270	4.7%	(1)
Woodrow Clark	175,000	*
Lane Harrison	175,000	*
All directors and named executive officers as a group (3 individuals)	7,317,270	4.7%

5% or More Shareholders
WePower Energy Corp.	8,295,454	5.6%

_______________

(1) Includes 1,902,451 shares held by Randall Letcavage personally, 2,810,719 shares controlled by him through his ownership interest in Green Central Holdings, Inc., and 2,254,100 shares controlled by him through his ownership interest in iCapital Advisory LLC.

Premier is not aware of any person who owns of record, or is known to own beneficially, five percent or more of the outstanding securities of any class of Premier, other than as set forth above.

Changes in Control Arrangements

None.

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Transactions with Officers and Directors

Other than the transactions described below, since January 1, 2013, there has not been, nor is there currently proposed, any transaction or series of similar transactions to which we were or will be a party:

	Ÿ	in which the amount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal years; and
	Ÿ	in which any director, executive officer, stockholder who beneficially owns 5% or more of our common stock or any member of their immediate family had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, Mr. Letcavage (directly or through related entities) was paid $300,500 as compensation for his role as our CEO and CFO, and $37,500 for consulting, for a total of $338,000.

Reimbursements paid to Mr. Letcavage for out-of-pocket expenses included $93,306 for documented office expenses, and $661,319 for contract labor, including payments to Nexalin Technology specifically for the direct costs related to independent contractors performing sales lead generation (Nexalin Technology is in an unrelated business to the Company, and Mr. Letcavage is its president), for a total of $754,625.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Audit fees

Effective April 9, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Company dismissed M&K CPAS, PLLC as its independent registered accounting firm and engaged Anton & Chia LLP (“A&C”) to serve as its independent registered accounting firm. There were no disagreements with M&K CPAS, PLLC on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure during this time that, if not resolved to the satisfaction of M&K CPAS, PLLC, would have caused M&K CPAS, PLLC to make a reference to the subject matter of any such disagreement in connection with its report on Premier Holding Corporation’s consolidated financial statements

The aggregate fees billed for the two most recently completed fiscal periods ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 for professional services rendered by Anton & Chia LLP (“A&C”) and M&K CPAS, PLLC, respectively for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, quarterly reviews of our interim consolidated financial statements and services normally provided by the independent accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for these fiscal periods were as follows:

Fees	Year Ended December 31, 2013		Year Ended December 31, 2012
Audit Fees and Audit Related Fees	$	27,100	$	14,250
Tax Fees		–		–
All Other Fees		–		–
Total	$	27,100	$	14,250

In the above table, “audit fees” are fees billed by our company’s external auditor for services provided in auditing our company’s annual consolidated financial statements for the subject year. “Audit-related fees” are fees not included in audit fees that are billed by the auditor for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit review of our Company’s consolidated financial statements. “Tax fees” are fees billed by the auditor for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. “All other fees” are fees billed by the auditor for products and services not included in the foregoing categories.

Item 15. EXHIBITS

No.	Description	Incorporation By Reference
3.1	Articles of Incorporation, as amended	Filed on June 21, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference.
3.2	Bylaws	Filed on June 21, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference.
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith.
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 Certifications under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith.
10.1	The Power Company residential supplier contract	Filed herewith.
10.2	The Power Company Commercial supplier contract	Filed herewith.
10.3	The Power Company residential customer contract	Filed herewith.
10.4	The Power Company commercial customer contract	Filed herewith.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document	Filed herewith.
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema	Filed herewith.
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase	Filed herewith.
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase	Filed herewith.
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase	Filed herewith.
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase	Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: July 14, 2015

Premier Holding Corporation

/s/ Randall Letcavage

Randall Letcavage

Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Date: July 14, 2015

/s/ Randall Letcavage

Randall Letcavage

Chairman of the Board of Directors

Date: July 14, 2015

/s/ Woodrow Clark

Woodrow Clark

Director

Date: July 14, 2015

/s/ Lane Harrison

Lane Harrison

Director

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

PREMIER HOLDING CORP. Reports