Standard Metals Processing, Inc. - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Standard Metals Processing, Inc.	Financial_Report.xls
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - Standard Metals Processing, Inc.	v393400_ex32-2.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - Standard Metals Processing, Inc.	v393400_ex32-1.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - Standard Metals Processing, Inc.	v393400_ex31-1.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - Standard Metals Processing, Inc.	v393400_ex31-2.htm

U. S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014

¨	TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission file number 000-14319

STANDARD METALS PROCESSING, INC.

(Exact Name of Small Business Issuer as Specified in its Charter)

Nevada		84-0991764
(State or Other Jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
Incorporation or Organization)

611 Walnut Street, Gadsden, Alabama 35901

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

888-960-7347

(Issuer’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

N/A

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, If Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No x

As of November 13, 2014, there were 103,285,603 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, par value $.001, outstanding.

STANDARD METALS PROCESSING, INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

September 30, 2014

		Page
PART I
Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation	21
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	26
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	26

PART II
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	26
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	28
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	28
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	29
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	29
Item 5.	Other Information	29
Item 6.	Exhibits	30

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Form 10-Q contains certain statements which are forward-looking in nature and are based on the current beliefs of our management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to management, including statements related to the uncertainty of the quantity or quality of minerals in our tailings, the fluctuations in the market price of such reserves, general trends in our operations or financial results, plans, expectations, estimates and beliefs. In addition, when used in this Form 10-Q, the words “may,” “could,” “should,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “predict” and similar expressions and their variants, as they relate to us or our management, may identify forward-looking statements. These statements reflect our judgment as of the date of this Form 10-Q with respect to future events, the outcome of which is subject to risks. We have attempted to identify, in context, certain of the factors that we believe may cause actual future experience and results to differ materially from our current expectations, which may have a significant impact on our business, operating results, financial condition or your investment in our common stock, as described in Part I, Item 1A entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results or outcomes may vary materially from those described herein.

We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. However, your attention is directed to any further disclosures made on related subjects in our subsequent periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K.

Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

STANDARD METALS PROCESSING, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(unaudited)

	September 30,			December 31,
	2014			2013
Assets
Current assets:
Cash	$	5,791		$	143,099
Prepaid expenses, related party		5,000			-
Prepaid expenses		29,807			5,000

Total current assets		40,598			148,099
Shea Mining and Milling Assets		35,159,427			35,159,427
Property, plant and equipment:
Machinery and equipment		1,713,210			21,000
Construction in progress		1,559,655			68,349
		3,272,865			89,349
Accumulated depreciation		(13,213	)		-
Net property, plant and equipment		3,259,652			89,349
Total Assets	$	38,459,677		$	35,396,875

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Senior secured convertible promissory note payable, related party	$	2,092,097		$	-
Short-term notes payable		-			25,000
Convertible notes payable, current portion		175,000			275,000
Due to Wits Basin Precious Minerals Inc.		16,616			16,616
Accounts payable		2,039,307			1,138,951
Accrued interest		199,382			86,143
Accrued expenses		671,143			1,385,251
Total current liabilities		5,193,545			2,926,961

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 8)

Senior secured convertible promissory note payable, related party		-			2,092,097

Preferred stock, 50,000,000 shares authorized:
Series A, $.001 par value, 10,000,000 and 10,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		10,000,000			10,000,000

Shareholders’ equity:
Series B preferred stock, no shares issued and outstanding,		-			-
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized: 102,706,576 and 91,266,411 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		102,707			91,266
Additional paid-in capital		73,654,936			56,114,271
Accumulated deficit		(50,491,511	)		(35,827,720	)
Total shareholders’ equity		23,266,132			20,377,817
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	38,459,677		$	35,396,875

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

STANDARD METALS PROCESSING, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2014			September 30, 2013			September 30, 2014			September 30, 2013

Revenues	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-

Operating expenses:
General and administrative		1,390,818			600,672			13,412,422			1,277,441
Depreciation and amortization		4,400			-			13,213			-

Total operating expenses		1,395,218			600,672			13,425,635			1,277,441
Loss from operations		(1,395,218	)		(600,672	)		(13,425,635	)		(1,277,441	)

Other income (expense):
Other income		1,587			1,587			4,761			4,232
Loss on settlement of debt		(147,468	)		(1,143,228	)		(1,106,487	)		(1,164,262	)
Interest expense		(44,479	)		(93,739	)		(136,430	)		(319,220	)
Stock warrant expense for employee		-			(46,011	)		-			(46,011	)

Total other income (expense)		(190,360	)		(1,281,391	)		(1,238,156	)		(1,525,261	)
Loss before income tax provision		(1,585,578	)		(1,882,063	)		(14,663,791	)		(2,802,702	)

Income tax provision		-			-			-			-
Net loss	$	(1,585,578	)	$	(1,882,063	)	$	(14,663,791	)	$	(2,802,702	)

Basic and diluted net loss per common share	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.05	)

Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		102,226,609			59,184,597			97,647,623			56,838,409

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

STANDARD METALS PROCESSING, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

(unaudited)

					Additional
	Common stock				paid-in		Accumulated
	Shares		Amount		capital		deficit			Total

BALANCE, at December 31, 2013		91,266,411	$	91,266	$	56,114,271	$	(35,827,720	)	$	20,377,817

Stock issued for conversion of convertible debt		237,118		237		118,322		-			118,559

Stock issued for the exercise of common stock warrants and options		6,352,867		6,354		3,299,429		-			3,305,783

Stock issued for the settlement of accounts payable and accrued expense		2,100,180		2,100		2,296,156		-			2,298,256

Options issued for compensation						7,237,008		-			7,237,008

Stock issued for compensation		2,750,000		2,750		4,589,750		-			4,592,500

Net loss		-		-		-		(14,663,791	)		(14,663,791	)

BALANCE, at September 30, 2014		102,706,576	$	102,707	$	73,654,936	$	(50,491,511	)	$	23,266,132

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

STANDARD METALS PROCESSING, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2014			September 30, 2013
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(14,663,791	)	$	(2,802,702	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash flows used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		13,213			-
Compensation expense related to issuance of common stock, warrants and stock option grants		11,829,508			-
Loss on extinguishment of debt and accrued expenses		1,106,487			1,164,262
Expense incurred to issuance of warrants attendant to conversion of convertible notes		-			46,011
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses related party		(5,000	)
Prepaid expenses		(24,807	)		(5,000	)
Accounts payable		1,724,266			288,882
Accrued expenses		(66,983	)		786,352

Net cash used in operating activities		(87,107	)		(522,195	)

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of equipment		(1,692,210	)		(21,000	)
Payments for construction in progress		(1,491,306	)		-

Net cash used in investing activities		(3,183,516	)		(21,000	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayment of short term note principal		(25,000	)		-
Cash proceeds from issuance of common stock, warrants and exercise of stock options and warrants, net		3,158,315			4,000
Cash proceeds from debt		-			541,542

Net cash provided by financing activities		3,133,315			545,542

Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(137,308	)		2,347
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period		143,099			94
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period	$	5,791		$	2,441

Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
Issuance of common stock in lieu of payment on long-term note		-			713,117
Accrued expenses converted into notes payable		-			245,967
Debt and accrued interest of Pure Path short-term loan facility converted into common stock		-			2,063,657
Short-term notes payable and accrued interest converted into convertible promissory notes		-			245,967
Convertible promissory notes and accrued interest converted into common stock		118,559			-
Expenses paid on behalf of Company by Pure Path through increase in short-term loan facility		-			2,063,657
Conversions into common stock of amounts originally due to Shea		225,000			-
Common stock issued in settlement of accounts payable and accrued expenses		1,114,237			467,150

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

STANDARD METALS PROCESSING, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2014

(unaudited)

NOTE 1 - OVERVIEW

Standard Metals Processing, Inc. (formerly Standard Gold Holdings, Inc., Standard Gold, Inc. and Princeton Acquisitions, Inc.) (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Colorado on July 10, 1985 as a blind pool or blank check company. On September 29, 2009, the Company completed a share exchange agreement with Hunter Bates Mining Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (“Hunter Bates”) and certain of its shareholders, in which Hunter Bates’ shareholders exchanged all of their capital securities into similar capital securities of the Company (the “Hunter Bates Share Exchange”) and the Company adopted the business model of Hunter Bates of mineral exploration and mining. Accordingly, the Hunter Bates Share Exchange represented a change in control and Hunter Bates became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

Prior to September 29, 2009, Wits Basin Precious Minerals Inc., a Minnesota corporation and public reporting company quoted on the Pink Sheets under the symbol “WITM” (“Wits Basin”) was the majority shareholder of Hunter Bates. Hunter Bates was formed in April 2008 to acquire the prior producing gold mine properties (consisting of land, buildings, equipment, mining claims and permits) located in Central City, Colorado, known as the “Bates-Hunter Mine.” We had not engaged in any exploration or mining activities at the Bates-Hunter Mine properties and on April 29, 2011, the Company transferred all of its interests of Hunter Bates back to Wits Basin in order to develop the toll milling business as described below.

On March 15, 2011, the Company closed a series of transactions, whereby it acquired certain assets of Shea Mining & Milling, LLC (“Shea Mining”). The exchange agreement was by and between the Company, Shea Mining, Afignis, LLC, Leslie Lucas Partners, LLC, Wits Basin and Alfred A. Rapetti (the “Shea Exchange Agreement”) whereby the Company acquired certain assets from Shea Mining, which assets include those located in Tonopah, Nevada, of land, buildings, a dormant milling facility, abandoned milling equipment, water permits and mine tailings (financed through a note payable assigned to us), mine dumps, a property lease and a contract agreement in exchange for 35,000,000 shares of the Company’s unregistered shares. The Shea Exchange Agreement did not include any operable toll milling equipment, employees or operational processes and therefore has been accounted for as a purchase of a group of assets. The Company completed the Shea Exchange Agreement to acquire the Shea Mining assets and develop a toll milling services business of precious minerals. Toll milling is a process whereby mined material is crushed and ground into fine particles to ease the extraction of any precious minerals contained therein, such as gold, silver, lead, zinc and copper, and rare earth metals. See Note 4 – Acquisition of Shea Milling and Mining Assets for a detailed discussion.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The financial statements include the accounts of Standard Metals Processing, Inc. and wholly owned subsidiaries Tonopah Milling and Metals Group, Inc. (and its wholly owned subsidiaries Tonopah Custom Processing, Inc. and Tonopah Resources, Inc.) and Esmeralda Renewable Energy, Inc. All significant intercompany transactions, accounts and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”), for interim financial information pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by US GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Form 10-K filed April 11, 2014. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year as a whole.

Shea Mining and Milling Assets

The Company recorded the estimated fair value of the Shea Mining and Milling assets as an aggregate amount on the condensed balance sheets. The assets include the mine tailings and dumps, the land, water rights and the milling facility (the buildings and equipment). None of the assets have been put into production, nor has the Company performed any repair or updates to any of the equipment or buildings. As such, the Company will continue to classify them under a single listing.

Mineral Properties

Mineral property acquisition costs are recorded at cost and are deferred until the viability of the property is determined. No properties have produced operating revenues at this time. Exploration, mineral property evaluation, option payments, related acquisition costs for mineral properties acquired under an option agreement, general overhead, administrative and holding costs to maintain a property on a care and maintenance basis are expensed in the period they are incurred. When reserves are determined for a property and a bankable feasibility study is completed, subsequent exploration and development costs on the property would be capitalized. If a project were to be put into production, capitalized costs would be depleted on the unit of production basis.

Management reviews the net carrying value of each mineral property as changes may materialize with a property or at a minimum, on an annual basis. Where information and conditions suggest impairment, estimated future net cash flows from each property are calculated using estimated future prices, proven and probable reserves and value beyond proven and probable reserves, and operating, capital and reclamation costs on an undiscounted basis. If it is determined that the future cash flows are less than the carrying value, a write-down to the estimated fair value is made with a charge to loss for the period. Where estimates of future net cash flows are not available and where other conditions suggest impairment, management assesses if the carrying value can be recovered.

Management’s estimates of gold prices, recoverable reserves, probable outcomes, operating capital and reclamation costs are subject to risks and uncertainties that may affect the recoverability of mineral property costs.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation. The amendments in this update remove the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the Accounting Standards Codification, thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage that in prior years it had been in the development stage. The Company adopted ASU No. 2014-10 during the third quarter of the year ended December 31, 2014.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements— Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.” Continuation of a reporting entity as a going concern is presumed as the basis for preparing financial statements unless and until the entity’s liquidation becomes imminent. Preparation of financial statements under this presumption is commonly referred to as the going concern basis of accounting. Currently, there is no guidance under US GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments in this Update provide that guidance. In doing so, the amendments should reduce diversity in the timing and content of footnote disclosures. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). For the period ended September 30, 2014, management evaluated the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and concluded that substantial doubt has not been alleviated about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. While the Company continues to explore further significant sources of financing, management’s assessment was based on the uncertainty related to the amount and nature of such financing over the next twelve months.

NOTE 3 – COMPANY’S GOING CONCERN

The accompanying condensed financial statements have been prepared in conformity with US GAAP, assuming we will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we incurred losses from operations of $14,663,791. At September 30, 2014, we had an accumulated deficit of $50,491,511 and a working capital deficit of $5,152,947. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on its ability to raise the required additional capital or debt financing to meet short and long-term operating requirements. The Company believes that future private placements of equity capital and debt financing are needed to fund our long-term operating requirements. The Company may also encounter business endeavors that require significant cash commitments or unanticipated problems or expenses that could result in a requirement for additional cash. If the Company raises additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of current shareholders could be reduced, and such securities might have rights, preferences or privileges senior to the Company’s common stock. Additional financing may not be available upon acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, the Company may not be able to take advantage of prospective business endeavors or opportunities, which could significantly and materially restrict our operations. The Company is continuing to pursue external financing alternatives to improve our working capital position. If the Company is unable to obtain the necessary capital, the Company may have to cease operations.

NOTE 4 – ACQUISITION OF SHEA MINING AND MILLING ASSETS

On March 15, 2011, the Company entered into an exchange agreement by and between us, Shea Mining, Afignis, LLC, Leslie Lucas Partners, LLC, Wits Basin and Alfred A. Rapetti (the “Shea Exchange Agreement”) whereby the Company acquired certain assets from Shea Mining, which assets include those located in Tonopah (financed through a note payable assigned to the Company), mine dumps, a property lease and a contract agreement in exchange for 35,000,000 shares of the Company’s unregistered shares. The Shea Exchange Agreement did not include any operable toll milling equipment, employees or operational processes and therefore has been accounted for as a purchase of a group of assets. The Company completed the Shea Exchange Agreement to acquire the Shea assets and develop a toll milling services business of precious minerals.

Pursuant to the assignment of a note payable, the Company executed an Assignment and Assumption of Loan Documents and Loan Modification Agreement, by and between the Company, Shea Mining and NJB Mining, Inc. (the “Loan Modification Agreement”), dated March 15, 2011, for those assets located in Tonopah, Nevada (“Tonopah”), consisting of land, buildings, mining tailings, a dormant milling facility, abandoned milling equipment and water permits. The land encompasses 1,174 deeded acres, one of the largest private land holdings in Esmeralda County, Nevada. An estimated 2.2 million tons of tailings known as the “Millers Tailings” from the historic gold rush of Goldfield and Tonopah, Nevada is sitting on approximately 334 acres of this land.

The Tonopah property was subject to an existing $2,500,000 first deed of trust which was in default at the time of the Shea Exchange Agreement and included accrued interest of $375,645 which was also assumed in the transaction. As part of the assignment, NJB Mining, Inc. (“NJB”) modified the related note to allow us until May 14, 2011 to refinance this mortgage, which was subsequently extended numerous times. As of August 31, 2011, the Company was still in default under the terms of the Loan Modification Agreement, and therefore entered into a forbearance agreement with NJB, (the “NJB Forbearance Agreement”), in which NJB agreed to forbear from initiating legal proceedings, including forbearance of the deed of trust and enforcement of its collection remedies. The NJB Forbearance Agreement further provided for additional extensions up through December 9, 2011. On December 9, 2011, Pure Path Capital Management Company, LLC (“Pure Path”) purchased the Loan Modification Agreement and the NJB Forbearance Agreement directly from NJB. On December 21, 2011, the Company entered into an amended and restated forbearance agreement with Pure Path (the “A&R Forbearance”), whereby Pure Path extended the provisions of the NJB Forbearance Agreement. Pure Path provided an additional extension to stay any action of the A&R Forbearance until June 8, 2012, on which date, if not paid or another agreement was not executed, the Company would be required to issue 5,000,000 shares of its common stock to Pure Path; such extension was provided without additional consideration. The Company did not pay the balance of the mortgage on June 8, 2012 and pursuant to the terms of the A&R Forbearance Agreement, the Company was required to issue 5,000,000 shares to Pure Path. The 5,000,000 shares were approved for issuance by the Board of Directors on October 9, 2012 and were issued to Pure Path on December 6, 2012. Pure Path provided additional extensions to stay any action of the Forbearance Agreement until August 31, 2013; such extensions were provided without additional consideration. On October 10, 2013, the Company entered into a Settlement and Release Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Pure Path. Pursuant to the Agreement, Pure Path relinquished the rights and obligations owed to it and agreed to forbear collection remedies and legal proceedings against the Company including foreclosure on the Deed of Trust. In connection with the settlement and release of various debts of approximately $1,500,000, consulting fees owed by the Company, and relinquishment of rights by Pure Path, the Company issued 27,000,000 restricted shares and a convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $1,933,345 bearing interest of 8% per year for the current balance of the amounts owed under the Pure Path Agreements.

In connection with the Shea Exchange Agreement, the Company also was assigned the ownership of approximately a six square mile section of mine dump material in Manhattan, Nevada (“Manhattan”).

The other assets the Company acquired consisted of a property lease, which allowed the use of an assay lab property and the associated water permits, (with a right to purchase for $6,000,000) and a contract agreement, which allowed the use of processing permits, located in Amargosa Valley, Nevada (“Amargosa”). The Company paid a monthly base rent of $17,500 on this lease and $5,000 monthly on the contract agreement. In January 2012, the landlord of the Amargosa lease caused to have served a five Day Notice To Pay Rent Or Quit due to default in the monthly $17,500 lease payments. The Company began immediate communications with the landlord, which resulted in a delay of further actions by the landlord to pursue any remedies. Then on February 9, 2012, the landlord caused to have served an Order For Summary Eviction (“Eviction”) due to continued default in lease payments. Effective with the Eviction, a total of $112,500 in lease and contract payments remain unpaid as well as $10,500 in late fees required pursuant to the terms of the lease. On February 10, 2012, the Beatty County Sheriff completed the Eviction at Amargosa and we as such, no longer have access to the assay lab or permits at Amargosa. As a result, all remaining equipment at Amargosa with an aggregate value of $40,925 was written off as impaired.

Pursuant to the Shea Exchange Agreement, the Company issued a total of 35,000,000 shares of our common stock to the equity holders of Shea Mining in exchange for certain of their assets, resulting in those holders owning an ownership interest of approximately 87% of the Company’s then currently outstanding common stock (approximately 56% ownership interest on a fully diluted basis). Alfred A. Rapetti, a former member of our Board of Directors and former Chief Executive Officer, was granted an irrevocable voting proxy for half of the shares issued to the Shea Mining equity holders, which continued until the affected shares are publicly sold after a period of at least six months, and thereafter in accordance with all applicable securities laws. In August 2011, these rights were transferred to Blair Mielke, a former director of the Company. The proxy is no longer in effect. The Company also agreed to indemnify Shea Mining from any liabilities arising after March 15, 2011 out of the Loan Modification Agreement or the loan agreements.

The purchase consideration of the assets acquired was calculated as follows:

Issuance of 35,000,000 shares of common stock with an estimated fair value of $0.89 per share (closing sales price on March 15, 2011)	$	31,150,000
Cash consideration		700,000
Assumption of NJB Mining mortgage		2,500,000
Assumption of accrued interest and other liabilities		463,184
Legal costs (includes issuance of 100,000 shares of common stock valued at $89,000)		205,258
Other direct expenses incurred in connection with the Shea Exchange Agreement		140,985
	$	35,159,427

In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, cost of acquiring a group of assets is allocated to the individual assets within the group based on the relative fair values of the individual assets.

The table below sets forth the final purchase price allocation. The estimated fair value of the mineral properties and property and equipment was determined based on level 3 inputs using cost and market value approaches.

Tonopah mine tailings	$	24,888,252
Tonopah dormant milling facility		8,062,875
Tonopah land		1,760,000
Tonopah water rights		348,300
Manhattan mine dumps		100,000
Total	$	35,159,427

Simultaneous with these transactions, pursuant to the Shea Exchange Agreement, Wits Basin exchanged 19,713,544 shares of our common stock it held for 10,000,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock. The Series A Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $10,000,000, payable only upon certain liquidity events or upon achievement of a market value of our equity equaling $200,000,000 or more. Additional details regarding the Series A Preferred Stock can be found in our Articles of Amendment, which were filed with the Colorado Secretary of State on January 4, 2013. Additionally, we obtained the right to transfer our entire interest and related debt of the Bates-Hunter Mine, at any time prior to June 13, 2011, to Wits Basin in exchange for the cancellation of a promissory note issued by Hunter Bates payable in favor of Wits Basin in the approximate amount of $2,500,000. On April 29, 2011, the Board of Directors approved this transfer effective April 29, 2011.

Furthermore, Wits Basin had entered into certain commitments that involved shares of our common stock and as a result of their exchange of substantially all of the Company’s common stock they held for Series A Preferred Stock, they could no longer honor those commitments. In consideration of Wits Basin agreeing to the exchange, the Company agreed to enter into two stock option agreements as follows: (1) the Company granted to one of Wits Basin’s major lenders a replacement stock option, on substantially the same terms as the stock option issued by Wits Basin, to purchase up to 1,299,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share expiring on December 14, 2014 (of which the holder exercised 10,000 shares of the option with a payment of $10,000 during 2011) and (2) the Company granted to Wits Basin a replacement stock option, expiring on December 19, 2014, to purchase up to 630,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, at an exercise price of $0.50 per share.

NOTE 5 – PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

The Company is preparing the Tonopah property site for the construction of permitted custom processing toll milling facility including grading the land, installing fencing and working with contractors for our 21,875 square foot building and servicing and drilling various wells for our future operations.

Components of our property, plant and equipment are as follows:

	September 30,			December 31,
	2014			2013
Equipment	$	1,713,210		$	21,000

Construction in progress		1,559,255			68,349
Less accumulated depreciation		(13,813	)		—
	$	3,259,652		$	89,349

NOTE 6 – SHORT-TERM NOTES PAYABLE

The following table summarizes the Company’s short-term notes payable:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2014		2013
Promissory note issued on September 7, 2010, in the principal amount of $25,000 to Stephen Flechner, our President at the time, utilized for a potential mining project; stated interest rate of 5%; accrued interest of $4,147 at December 31, 2013; with a maturity date of November 30, 2010, original terms apply in the default period. (1)	$	—	$	25,000

Totals	$	—	$	25,000

(1) Secured by a personal guarantee of Stephen D. King, our CEO at the time. The principal and interest of this note were paid in full on February 13, 2014.

Summary

The following table summarizes the short-term notes payable activity for the quarter ended September 30, 2014:

Balance at December 31, 2013	$	25,000
Add: advances from Pure Path		—
Less: principal repaid		(25,000	)
Balance at September 30, 2014	$	—

There were no short-term notes outstanding as of September 30, 2014.

NOTE 7 - SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Preferred Stock

Series A

Simultaneous with the Shea Exchange Agreement, Wits Basin exchanged 19,713,544 shares of the Company’s common stock it held for 10,000,000 shares ($.001 par value each) of “Series A Preferred Stock” with an original issue price of $1.00 per share.

Attributes of Series A Preferred Stock can be found in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the Commission on April 11, 2014 and in the Company’s filings with the Secretary of State of Colorado.

Series B

There are no shares of Series B Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.

Attributes of Series B Preferred Stock can be found in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the Commission on April 11, 2014 and in the Company’s filings with the Secretary of State of Nevada.

Common Stock Issuances

For services

On June 18, 2014, the Company issued 1,000,000 restricted common shares to a service provider. These shares were valued at fair value of $1.67 per share and have been charged as stock compensation to general and administrative expense.

On June 18, 2014, the Company issued 250,000 restricted common shares to the President of our subsidiary Tonopah Custom Processing, Inc. These shares were valued at fair value of $1.67 per share and have been charged as stock compensation to general and administrative expense.

On June 18, 2014, the Company issued 1,500,000 restricted common shares to an officer of the Company. These shares were valued at fair value of $1.67 per share and have been charged as stock compensation to general and administrative expense.

Conversion of Unsecured Note

A holder of a convertible promissory note dated January 26, 2011 converted the entirety of the note consisting of $100,000 of principal and $18,559 of interest on February 28, 2014 into 237,118 shares of the Company’s common stock.

Debt Settlements

On January 17, 2014, the Company entered into a Debt Settlement Agreement with a debt holder wherein a $193,910 debt was settled for 387,820 shares of restricted common stock. An additional $80,000 of debt was extinguished.

On January 17, 2014, the Company entered into a Debt Settlement Agreement with a debt holder wherein a $125,000 debt was settled for 250,000 shares of restricted common stock.

On January 17, 2014, the Company settled a $225,000 debt by converting the entire debt into 800,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company. Pursuant to a Debt Settlement Agreement previously executed on April 3, 2013 the debt was converted at a per share price of $0.28125.

On February 13, 2014, the Company entered into a Agreement with a debt holder wherein a $458,250 of accrued expenses was settled for 300,000 shares of restricted common stock and $21,750 was charged as loss on settlement of debt to general and administrative expense.

On March 4, 2014, the Company entered into a Debt Settlement Agreement with a debt holder wherein a $100,000 debt was settled for 200,000 shares of restricted common stock.

On April 22, 2014, the Company entered into a Debt Settlement Agreement with a debt holder wherein a $100,000 debt was settled for 112,360 shares of restricted common stock.

On June 10, 2014, the Company issued 50,000 unregistered shares of common stock to a former consultant for the settlement of consulting fees.

On July 15, 2014, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement with a former director wherein the parties agreed on the number of options issued to the former director under the 2010 Plan, resolved any and all claims against the Company and the Company issued 150,000 warrants at an exercise price of $2.00 per share that expire July 15, 2017. The fair value of the options of $147,468 was recorded as loss on settlement of debt. The fair value was determined using Black-Scholes using an exercise price of $2.00, volatility 75%, and a risk free rate of return of 0.98%.

The Company recorded non-cash loss on settlement of debt of $1,106,487 and $1,164,262 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Stock Warrants

The following table summarizes information about the Company’s stock warrants outstanding:

	Number			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Range of Exercise Price		Weighted Remaining Contractual Life
Outstanding at December 31, 2013		13,989,206		$	0.67	$	0.20 - 1.00

Granted		150,000		$	2.00	$	2.00
Cancelled or expired		—			—		—
Exercised		(6,070,867	)	$	0.52	$	0.25 – 1.00
Warrants outstanding at September 30, 2014		8,068,339		$	0.82	$	0.20 – 2.00	3.8 years

Warrants exercisable at September 30, 2014		8,068,339		$	0.82	$	0.20 – 2.00

During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, a total of 6,070,867 warrants to purchase common stock were exercised: 1,830,867 warrants were exercised at a price of $0.25 per share; 520,000 warrants exercised at $0.50 per share; 3,250,000 warrants exercised at $0.60 per share, 40,000 warrants exercised at $0.89 per share and 430,000 at $1.00 per share for an aggregate total of $3,133,317.

Stock Option Grants

2010 Plan

The company had one stock option plan: the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2010 Plan”). Stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other stock and cash awards may be granted under the 2010 Plan. In general, options vest over a period ranging from immediate vesting to five years and expire 10 years from the date of grant. Effective January 21, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) authorized an amendment to the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, to increase the number of options available for granting under the 2010 Plan from 3,000,000 to 13,500,000 and authorized the Company to file an S-8 Registration Statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (subsequently filed on January 27, 2011, File No. 333-171906) for the registration of the shares available in the 2010 Plan. On March 15, 2011, with the closing of the Shea Exchange Agreement a “change of control” event was deemed to have occurred and 13,500,000 previously granted stock options vested in full. Effective July 25, 2011, the 2010 Plan was amended to increase the total shares of stock which may be issued under the Plan from 13,500,000 to 14,500,000. As of December 31, 2012, an aggregate of 6,200,000 shares of our common stock were available to be granted under our 2010 Plan.

The Company has been receiving files from former officers and attorneys. Upon review of the files, the original 2010 Plan and Board Resolution were located. The 2010 Plan approved by the Board of Directors on March 22, 2010 authorized 3,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the 2010 Plan. The Board of Directors voted to increase the number of shares available under the 2010 Plan on January 21, 2011. Section 9.11 of the 2010 Plan as approved by the Board states:

9.11 Amendment of the Plan. The Board of Directors may amend or discontinue the Plan at any time. However, no such amendment or discontinuance shall adversely change or impair, without the consent of the recipient, an Incentive previously granted. Further, no such amendment shall, without approval of the stockholders of the Company, (a) increase the maximum number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued to all participants under the Plan, (b) change or expand the types of Incentives that may be granted under the Plan, (c) change the class of persons eligible to receive Incentives under the Plan, or (d) materially increase the benefits accruing to participants under the Plan.

Pursuant to the terms of the 2010 Plan, the stockholders of the Company must approve this increase. As the stockholders of the Company did not approve the increase of shares available under the 2010 Plan, the increase on January 21, 2011 was not effective.

As of January 21, 2011 the Company had issued a total of 2,800,000 options to purchase shares under the 2010 Plan and had 200,000 shares remaining authorized and unissued. However, also on January 21, 2011, the Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 10,500,000 options. This issuance far exceeded the number of shares available and the excess issuances were not valid. As a correction measure, the Company has divided the 200,000 shares that were available pro-rata between the persons named in the resolution.

As a result of this correction there are a total of 1,631,842 options granted and available for exercise under the 2010 Plan outstanding as of the date of this filing.

The Board of Directors terminated the 2010 option plan on August 23, 2013.

Options issued in 2013

The following options were issued in 2013 outside of any option plan:

The Company executed an Employment Agreement with Sharon Ullman dated effective November 13, 2013. As compensation for her employment as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Ms. Ullman was granted a total of 4,500,000 options to purchase common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.38 per share, with a grant term of 7 years. A total of 1,500,000 options vest upon each of the following: (i) November 13, 2013; (ii) June 1, 2014; and (iii) June 1, 2015.

The Company executed an Employment Agreement with Jim Stieben dated effective October 15, 2013. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Stieben was appointed the President and Director of Operations of Tonopah Custom Processing, Inc. As compensation for his services, Mr. Stieben was granted a total of 1,500,000 options to purchase common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.60 per share, with a grant term of 7 years. A total of 750,000 options vested on October 15, 2013, and 375,000 options will vest upon each of the following: (i) the completed construction of a permitted processing building on the Miller’s Mill site; and (ii) the Company achieving profitability.

2014 Option Plan

By Board Resolution effective January 27, 2014, the Company adopted a 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) to compensate employees and consulting groups in their efforts to enhance the long-term shareholder value of the Company. Pursuant to the Plan, selected persons are offered opportunities to participate in the Company’s growth and success and are encouraged to acquire and maintain stock ownership in the Company. The Plan grants options to purchase shares of our common stock vesting at dates beginning on the date of grant and issuable at chronological or performance increments. The Plan Administrator may also grandfather in existing options granted during 2013. The Company 2014 Plan was approved at the annual shareholder meeting on August 8, 2014.

Under administration by the Compensation Committee (the “Plan Administrator”), a maximum of 75,000,000 shares of common stock are available for issuance under the Plan, subject to adjustment from time to time. Awards may be granted under the Plan to officers, directors, employees and consultants of the Company and as the Plan Administrator selects. The Plan Administrator is authorized, in its sole discretion, to issue options as incentive stock options, which shall be appropriately designated. The term of each option to purchase common stock of the Company is established by the Plan Administrator or, if not so established, is 10 years from the grant date.

The Plan Administrator establishes the time at which each option shall vest and become exercisable. If not established in the instrument evidencing the option, the option shall vest and become exercisable according to the following schedule: (i) after one year of the participant’s continuous employment or service with the company or its related corporations, one quarter of the total options will be vested and exercisable; (ii) after each additional six-month period of continuous service completed thereafter, an additional one eighth of the total options will be vested and exercisable; and (iii) after four years, 100% of the options will be vested and exercisable. Under the terms of the Plan, the exercise price for shares shall be paid in cash or check to the Company unless the Plan Administrator determines otherwise.

The Plan Administrator shall determine whether the options will continue to be exercisable, and the terms and conditions of such exercise, if a participant ceases to be employed or provide services to the Company. If not so established in the instrument evidencing such options, any portion of an option that is not vested and exercisable on the date of termination of the participant’s employment or service relationship (the “Employment Termination Date”) shall expire on such date. Any portion of an option that is vested and exercisable on the Employment Termination Date shall expire upon the earliest to occur of: (i) if the participant’s Employment Termination Date occurs by reason of retirement, disability or death, the one-year anniversary of such Employment Termination Date; (ii) if the participant’s Employment Termination Date occurs for reasons other than cause, retirement, disability or death, the three-month anniversary of such Employment Termination Date; or (iii) the last day of the option term. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the participant dies after the Employment Termination Date while the Option is otherwise exercisable, the portion of the option that is vested and exercisable on such Employment Termination Date shall expire upon the earlier to occur of: (i) the last day of the option term; or (ii) the first anniversary of the date of death, unless the Plan Administrator determines otherwise.

If a participant is terminated for cause, the options shall automatically expire at the time the Company first notifies the participant of the termination. If a participant’s employment is suspended pending investigation of whether they will be terminated for cause, the participant’s rights under any option shall be suspended during the period of investigation. Awards granted under the Plan may not be assigned, except, to the extent permitted by Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “IRC”), and the Plan Administrator may permit such assignment, transfer and exercisability, and may permit a participant to designate a beneficiary who may exercise the award or receive compensation under the award after the participant’s death. Any award permitted to be assigned shall be subject to the terms and conditions contained in the instrument evidencing the award.

The Plan may only be amended by the Company’s Board of Directors, as it deems advisable. Shareholder approval shall be required for any amendment to the extent required for compliance with Section 422 of the IRC, as amended or any applicable law or regulation. The Board may suspend or terminate the Plan at any time. Incentive stock options may not be granted more than 10 years after the later of the Plan’s adoption by the Board or the adoption by the Board of any amendment to the Plan that constitutes adoption of a new plan for the purpose of Section 422 of the IRC. Participants who are residents of California shall be subject to additional terms and conditions until the Common Stock becomes a publicly traded security, under the California Securities Code.

We grandfathered the following options issued to consultants during the 4^th quarter of 2013 in to the 2014 Plan:

The Company entered into a Strategic Advisory Services Agreement with P5, LLC (“P5”) dated effective October 15, 2013, to provide strategic advisory services. As consideration for such services, the Company granted P5 an aggregate total of 17,500,000 options to purchase common stock of the Company, with 7,500,000 shares available for purchase at an exercise price of $0.65 per share and 10,000,000 shares available for purchase at an exercise price of $1.25 per share, with a grant term of seven years and subject to a vesting schedule. With respect to the options to purchase up to 7,500,000 shares at $0.65 per share, 2,500,000 options vest upon each of the following: (i) October 15, 2013 (the “P5 Grant Date”); (ii) 90 days after the P5 Grant Date; and (iii) 180 days after the P5 Grant Date. With respect to the options to purchase up to 10,000,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.25 per share, 2,500,000 options vest upon each of the following: April 1, 2014, July 1, 2014, October 1, 2014 and January 1, 2015.

The Company entered into a Strategic Advisory Services Agreement with a consultant dated effective October 15, 2013. As consideration for the consultant’s assistance in expanding the Company’s operations and securing new business arrangements, the Company granted the consultant an aggregate of 3,500,000 options to purchase common stock of the Company, with 1,500,000 shares available for purchase at an exercise price of $0.65 per share and 2,000,000 shares available for purchase at an exercise price of $1.25 per share, with a grant term of seven years and subject to a vesting schedule. With respect to the options to purchase up to 1,500,000 shares at $0.65 per share, 500,000 options vest upon each of the following: (i) October 15, 2013 (the “Consultant Grant Date”); (ii) 90 days after the Consultant Grant Date; and (iii) 180 days after the Consultant Grant Date. With respect to the options to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.25 per share, 500,000 options vest upon each of the following: April 1, 2014, July 1, 2014, October 1, 2014 and January 1, 2015.

On December 26, 2013, the Company entered into a Consulting Services Agreement with LR Advisors, LLC (“LRA”). Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, LRA agreed to provide the Company advisory services in connection with the Company’s investor relations. As compensation for such services, LRA was granted a total of 1,500,000 options to purchase common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $1.25 per share, with a grant term of seven years. The options vested in full upon execution of the agreement.

The Company entered into a Consulting Agreement with EAS Advisors, LLC (“EAS”) on January 1, 2014, whereby EAS agreed to provide the Company general corporate advice, guidance and strategic services relating to the Company’s milling assets and the development of mining clients and contacts. As consideration for such services, the Company granted EAS an aggregate of 2,000,000 options to purchase common stock of the Company, with 1,000,000 shares available for purchase at an exercise price of $1.25 per share and 1,000,000 shares available for purchase at an exercise price of $2.25 per share, with a grant term of seven years and subject to a vesting schedule. With respect to the options to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares at $1.25 per share, 250,000 options vest upon each of the following: (i) January 1, 2014 (the “EAS Grant Date”); (ii) 90 days after the EAS Grant Date; (iii) 180 days after the EAS Grant Date; and (iv) 270 days after the EAS Grant Date. With respect to the options to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares at an exercise price of $2.25 per share, 250,000 options vest upon each of the following: July 1, 2014, October 1, 2014, November 1, 2014 and December 1, 2014. The Company estimated the fair value of these options of $1,398,584 using the above Black-Scholes pricing model and will amortize over the vesting term.

On June 18, 2014, the Company granted 250,000 options to purchase common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $1.67 per share with a grant term of seven years to a legal advisor. The options vest in full on grant.

On June 18, 2014, the Company granted 750,000 options to purchase common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $1.67 per share with a grant term of seven years to the President of our Tonopah Custom Processing, Inc. subsidiary. The options vest in full on grant.

On June 18, 2014, the Company granted 1,000,000 options to purchase common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $1.67 per share with a grant term of seven years to an officer of the Company. The options vest in full on grant.

The Company uses the Black-Scholes pricing model as a method for determining the estimated fair value for stock awards. Compensation expense for stock awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of service awards and for performance based awards, the Company recognizes the expense when the performance condition is probable of being met.

In determining the compensation cost of the stock awards granted during fiscal 2014, the fair value of each grant had been estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model and the weighted average assumptions used in these calculations are summarized below:

	September 30,
	2014			2013
Risk-free interest rate		2.01 % to 2.43	%		—
Expected volatility factor		75	%		—
Expected dividend		—			—
Expected option term		7 years			—

The Company reviews its current assumptions on a periodic basis and adjusts them as necessary to ensure an accurate valuation. The risk-free interest rate is based on the Federal Reserve Board’s constant maturities of the U.S. Treasury bond obligations with terms comparable to the expected life of the options at their issuance date. The Company uses historical data to estimate expected forfeitures, expected dividend yield, expected volatility of the Company’s stock and the expected life of the options.

The Company recorded $7,227,008 and $0 related to non-cash compensation expense for the nine-months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. All compensation expense is included in general and administrative expense. There was no tax benefit from recording this non-cash expense due to our income tax valuation allowance and due to a portion of the options being incentive stock options. The compensation expense had a $0.07 and $0.00 per share impact on the loss per share for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. As of September 30, 2014, there was $1,672,653 in unrecognized compensation expense.

The following tables summarize information about the Company’s stock options:

	Number of Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Options outstanding - December 31, 2012		10,438,335		$	0.64

Granted		28,500,000			0.89
Canceled or expired		(6,187,493	)		0.56
Exercised		—			—
Options outstanding - December 31, 2013		32,750,842		$	0.88

Granted		4,000,000			1.71
Canceled or expired		(118,000	)		.60
Exercised		282,000			.60
Options outstanding – September 30, 2014		36,350,842		$	0.98

Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period ended September 30, 2014				$	1.71
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period ended September 30, 2013				$	0.00

A summary of the Company’s non-vested options at September 30, 2014, and changes during the period ended September 30, 2014, is presented below:

	Options			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested, beginning of period		21,750,000		$	0.24
Granted		4,000,000		$	0.94
Vested		(19,465,000	)	$	0.37
Forfeited		—		$	—
Non-vested, end of period		6,285,000		$	0.27

The following tables summarize information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2014:

	Options Outstanding at September 30, 2014
Range of Exercise Prices	Number Outstanding		Weighted Remaining Contractual Life	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Aggregate Intrinsic Value(1)

$0.40 to $0.60		6,961,842	5.5 years	$	0.46	$	8,567,274
$0.61 to $1.00		11,889,000	5.5 years	$	0.72	$	11,513,410
$1.01 to $1.50		14,500,000	5.6 years	$	1.25	$	6,380,000
$1.51 to $2.25		3,000,000	6.6 years	$	1.86	$	40,000
$0.40 to $2.25		36,350,842	5.8 years	$	1.07	$	26,500,684

	Options Exercisable at September 30, 2014
Range of Exercise Prices	Number Exercisable		Weighted Remaining Contractual Life	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Aggregate Intrinsic Value(1)

$0.40 to $0.60		4,711,842	5.2 years	$	0.46	$	5,814,774
$0.61 to $1.00		12,589,000	5.5 years	$	0.69	$	12,066,410
$1.00 to $1.50		8,500,000	5.3 years	$	1.22	$	3,740,000
$1.50 to $2.25		2,250,000	6.7 years	$	1.73	$	40,000
$0.40 to $2.25		28,050,842	5.6 years	$	0.92	$	21,661,184

(1)

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table represents the difference between the closing stock price on September 30, 2014 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on September 30, 2014.

On July 15, 2014, a holder with an option to purchase a total of 400,000 shares under the 2010 Plan originally granted on September 14, 2010 executed a cashless exercise wherein 282,000 restricted shares were issued and 118,000 shares were surrendered as payment for the issued shares.

NOTE 8 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In May 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to operate and manage a future toll milling facility in Clark County, Nevada as well as to perform other services, as requested by the Company. The term of the agreement was for two years and could be renewed by mutual agreement of the parties. In return for these services, the Company had agreed to the following compensation throughout the term of this agreement:

(1)

issue 300,000 shares of its unregistered common stock;

(2)

pay the consultant a cash payment of $10,000 per month plus certain living accommodation expenses for a residence in Clark County;

(3)

pay the consultant 25% of the calculated monthly net profits, as defined in the agreement, of the Clark County toll milling facility; and

(4)

pay the consultant 10% of the Company’s net profits derived from those contracts originated by the consultant.

The Company has abandoned any plans to construct a facility in Clark County because of zoning and permitting requirements. This location could have only been a laboratory and not a facility that housed both toll milling capabilities and a laboratory. At December 31, 2013, the Company had accrued $458,250 and $183,790 for the future issuance of the common stock and unpaid monthly cash payments, respectively. On February 13, 2014, the Company issued the 300,000 unregistered shares of common stock valued at $480,000 to the consultant.

NOTE 9 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Litigation

On October 3, 2014, Blair Mielke filed suit against Standard Metals Processing, Inc. in the Eighth Judicial District Court for the State of Nevada in and for the County of Clerk, alleging that Standard Metals had refused to issue and deliver to him shares of the company’s common stock, pursuant to the filing of a Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 30, 2011. Standard Metals Processing, Inc. intends to vigorously defend against Mielke’s claims.

Warrant Exercise

On October 7, 2014, 466,667 warrants to purchase common stock were exercised at a per share price of $0.60 for a total of $280,000.

On October 17, 2014, 112,360 warrants to purchase common stock were exercised at a per share price of $0.89 for a total of $100,000.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following management discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in connection with the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Report and the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward Looking Statements

Readers are cautioned that the following discussion contains certain forward-looking statements and should be read in conjunction with the “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” appearing at the beginning of this Annual Report.

The information contained in this Item 2 contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results may materially differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain risks and uncertainties set forth in this report. Although management believes that the assumptions made and expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, there is no assurance that the underlying assumptions will, in fact, prove to be correct or that actual results will not be different from expectations expressed in this report.

We desire to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This filing contains a number of forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s current views and expectations with respect to our business, strategies, products, future results and events, and financial performance. All statements made in this filing other than statements of historical fact, including statements addressing operating performance, events, or developments which management expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including statements related to distributor channels, volume growth, revenues, profitability, new products, adequacy of funds from operations, statements expressing general optimism about future operating results, and non-historical information, are forward looking statements. In particular, the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “may,” variations of such words, and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements, and their absence does not mean that the statement is not forward-looking. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those discussed below. Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from historical results as well as those expressed in, anticipated, or implied by these forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any obligation to revise these forward-looking statements to reflect any future events or circumstances.

Readers should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are based on management’s current expectations and projections about future events, are not guarantees of future performance, are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions (including those described below), and apply only as of the date of this filing. Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from the results expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Factors which could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, the risks to be discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and in the press releases and other communications to shareholders issued by us from time to time which attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors which may affect our business. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

History

Standard Metals Processing, Inc. (formerly known as Standard Gold Holdings, Inc., Standard Gold, Inc. and Princeton Acquisitions, Inc.) was incorporated in the State of Colorado on July 10, 1985. On September 29, 2009, we completed a share exchange agreement with Hunter Bates Mining Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (“Hunter Bates”) and certain of its shareholders, in which Hunter Bates’ shareholders exchanged all of their capital securities into similar capital securities of ours (the “Hunter Bates Share Exchange”) and we adopted the business model of Hunter Bates of minerals exploration and mining. Accordingly, the Hunter Bates Share Exchange represented a change in control and Hunter Bates became our wholly owned subsidiary.

On March 15, 2011, we closed a series of transactions, whereby we acquired certain assets of Shea Mining & Milling, LLC (“Shea Mining”), which assets include land, buildings, a dormant milling facility, abandoned milling equipment, water permits, mine tailings, mine dumps and the assignment of a note payable, a lease and a contract agreement with permits. We completed the Shea Exchange Agreement in order to offer toll milling services of precious minerals. Toll milling is a process whereby mined material is crushed and ground into fine particles to ease the extraction of any precious minerals contained therein, such as gold, silver, and platinum group metals. Custom milling and refining can include many different processes to extract precious metals from carbon or concentrates. These toll-processing services also distill, dry, mix, or mill chemicals and bulk materials on a contractual basis and provide a chemical production outsourcing option for industrial companies which lack the expertise, capacity, or regulatory permits for in-house production.

The Company re-domiciled from Colorado to Nevada in March 2013. We determined that, due to a lack of connection to Colorado, it was in the best interest of the Company to move its domicile to Nevada.

Overview of the Company

Standard Metals Processing, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “Standard Metals” or the “Company”) has offices in Gadsden, Alabama, New York, New York and through its subsidiary, a property in Tonopah, Nevada. Our business plan is to purchase equipment and build a facility on our Tonopah property to serve as a permitted custom processing toll milling facility (which includes an analytical lab, pyrometallurgical plant, and hydrometallurgical recovery plant).

The Company will perform permitted custom processing toll milling, a process whereby mined material is crushed and ground into fine particles to ease the extraction of any precious minerals contained therein, such as minerals in the gold, silver and platinum metal groups. Custom milling and refining can include many different processes that are designed specifically for each ore load and to maximize the extraction of precious metals from carbon or concentrates. These toll-processing services also distill, dry, mix, or mill chemicals and bulk materials on a contractual basis and provide a chemical production outsourcing option for industrial companies, which lack the expertise, capacity, or regulatory permits for in-house production.

We are required to obtain several permits before we can begin construction of a small scale mineral processing facility to conduct permitted processing toll milling activities and construction of the required additional buildings and well relocation necessary for us to commence operations.

Water Pollution Control Permit

Through the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Tonopah Custom Processing, Inc. (“TCP”), it filed a Water Pollution Control Permit (“WPCP”) Application with the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection (“NDEP”) Bureau of Mines and Mining Reclamation (“BMMR”) on August 28, 2013 for the approval of the permits necessary for a small-scale mineral processing facility planned for the Tonopah Property. The plant will perform laboratory testing, pilot testing, and custom processing of precious metal ores and concentrates from mining industry clients. Processing of ore materials will employ standard mineral processing techniques including gravity concentration, froth flotation and chemical leaching and carbon stripping.

The WPCP must be approved prior to commencing the planned construction of our processing plant in Tonopah, Nevada. We are still in the technical review stage of our WPCP. While the Company awaits approval, NDEP has allowed us to do limited site preparation.

We are preparing for construction of our processing facility, which includes working with contractors that will be building the new 21,875 square foot processing plant, cleaning and preparing the property, and refurbishing a trailer that will act as our construction office.

In connection with our WPCP application, NDEP suggested that we take the following actions: (i) retain a Nevada Certified Environmental Manager (“CEM”), (ii) perform Meteoric Profile II water testing on ground water directly below the mill as well as surrounding wells located off site, and (iii) determine baseline values of water using the Meteoric Profile II results. NDEP requested that the Company delay any new construction planned for “metal extraction” until after the permits are in place. We hired Allstate-Nevada Environmental Management, Inc., as our CEM to assist us with obtaining an NDEP WPCP and to help us fulfill all the requirements of NDEP including the Meteoric Profile II analysis, as well as advise on the overall site cleanup and assisting with any other NDEP requirements.

In March 2013, Advanced Surveying & Professional Services, as our Professional Land Surveyor (“PLS”), completed surveys and testing of the Tonopah property required for the application of our required permits. After completion of the survey, it was determined the property is 1,186 acres. The scope of work our PLS completed includes: (i) setting a total of 19 permanent monuments at angle points along lines, (ii) setting eight permanent monuments locating US Hwy 95, (iii) recording a professional map indicating longitude and latitude for all corners, and (iv) providing a digital map accessible in AutoCAD software.

NDEP’s review of the WPCP application typically takes 225 days. However, a backlog of permit applications may cause delays. We engaged HDR Engineering, Inc. to assist in the final portion of permitting with NDEP.

Water, Wells and Drilling Permit

The existing water rights on the property utilize two wells (points of diversion). We obtained a drilling permit from the Nevada Department of Water Resources (“NDWR”) on September 4, 2014 to move the point of diversion of one of our existing wells. The historic production well has not been used in recent years and is too far away from our new production plant. We are moving the point of diversion closer to our proposed production plant site to provide a localized source of fresh water. We hired Bruce Mackay Pump and Well Service to drill the new process/fresh water well that will change the point of diversion and drill a new well. The drilling of our new point of diversion process well was postponed from the last week of September/first week of October to the driller’s next available date, which is currently the last week of November/first week of December.

We placed a new 14,600 gallon water tank on the Tonopah property and completely rebuilt our existing domestic well to provide a supply of water for construction on the property, the construction office, and the newly built Recreational Vehicle (“RV”) park. The service of the domestic well included replacing the existing well pump with a higher volume submersible pump, installing a two inch supply line from the well to a 1,500 gallon fresh water supply tank, and a secondary water system including two 80 gallon pressure bladders and individual supply lines.

On March 10, 2014, we retained Interflow Hydrology, Inc. (“Interflow”) to engineer, design and oversee the installation of our four monitoring wells. The monitoring wells will be utilized by taking water samples up-gradient and down-gradient of our processing plant. A gradient is a direction of flow or convergence of the underground aquifer on the property. NDEP permitted us to begin the installation of up to one up-gradient and three down-gradient monitoring wells. We will take samples from the monitoring wells each quarter once they are operational to compare the laboratory water test results from up-gradient and down-gradient to act as a control. The baseline values of water quality are compared between up-gradient and down-gradient monitoring wells to show our site is not releasing any pollutants into the water table. Interflow will also provide us with an interpretation of groundwater gradient under our processing plant.

During the second quarter of 2014 we completed the installation of three monitoring wells and completed the background water testing (NDEP mandated Profile 1 water quality testing). We were notified that our three wells are sufficient and we do not need to drill a fourth.

Site and Facility Preparation

The Company received leased heavy equipment on August 1, 2013, which was used to begin cleanup of the site to prepare it for the new construction. We ordered a pre-fabricated building on November 4, 2013 and took delivery of the building on March 21, 2014. Upon receipt of our WPCP, we will begin erecting the building, which could take up to 120 days to complete.

The Company accepted delivery of additional large heavy equipment and broke ground on April 1, 2014. We completed the initial grading of specific designated areas on the 40 undisturbed acres of land including clearing all vegetation, removing of all scrap metal, and the excavation of the building pad for the preparation of the new 21,875 square foot processing plant. With the additional large heavy equipment onsite, we have completed the removal of all the extra and unnecessary materials and old equipment that have accumulated on the land.

We installed approximately one mile of perimeter security fencing around the new building site and completed an electrical service line extension to power the RV park.

We contracted NV Energy to provide a new service line agreement to provide up to 4,000+ amps of power that will be required for our operations. Although electrical service to our property is currently in place, we have to construct a new on-site electrical substation to provide the necessary power to our new processing plant.

We engaged SI International to assist us with numerous projects including designing and engineering our main building, our substation, the RV park, our water and sprinkler systems and our concrete footings and related soil testing. Although not required, the processing plant is being erected in strict conformity with the 2006 IRC building codes.

In April 2014 we purchased a complete Concrete Batch Plant, including four cement trucks, to reduce the overall cost of construction activities on site. This purchase is estimated to reduce the overall cost of construction by at least $500,000.

In August 2014 we purchased an extensive array of heavy-duty construction and milling equipment for use in the construction and operation of the Tonopah facility. The recently acquired heavy equipment allows us to move forward with construction of the processing plant and tailings ponds using our own equipment, saving the cost of expensive lease payments. The heavy equipment includes the necessary machinery for construction including dozers, loaders, water trucks and heavy transport tractors as well as equipment required for production including crushers, screening plants, and conveyors.

There is a severe housing shortage in the Tonopah area. Any available lodging has become increasingly expensive. In order to efficiently continue the rapid growth and improvements upon the Tonopah property, the Company completed a newly constructed, landscaped 5-space RV park complete with laundry facilities. The RV park allows us to house our construction contractors and provide onsite housing for future employees at a significant cost savings. The RV park was designed to easily allow future upgrades and up to 10 additional spaces. The new water supply system provides individual water lines to each RV space.

We engaged CivilWise Engineering to perform all civil engineering including the creation of a master site plan, a topographical study of the property, site drainage plans, sewer plans, vehicle access roadway and path plans and a soils and geology study.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 COMPARED TO THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013.

Revenues

We had no revenues from any operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. Furthermore, we do not anticipate any significant future revenue until we have sufficiently funded operations.

General and administrative expenses were $13,412,422 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to $1,277,441 for the same period in 2013. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the majority of general and administrative expense was compensation expense related to options and warrants totaling $11,829,508 as compared to zero compensation expenses related to options and warrants in the same period in 2013. In the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compensation expenses as well as operating expenses increased due to the employment agreements the Company entered into with its key officers and the increase in construction costs as we have begun site preparation for the toll milling facility and costs associated with permits, research and agreements. We anticipate that future compensation expenses will increase and that certain operating expenses will continue to increase for fiscal 2014 as we continue to build the infrastructure to proceed with permitted custom processing toll milling services.

General and administrative expenses were $1,390,818 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to $600,672 for the same period in 2013. For the three months ended September 30, 2014, the majority of general and administrative expense was compensation expense related to options and warrants totaling $969,281 as compared to zero compensation expenses related to options and warrants in the same period in 2013. In the three months ended September 30, 2014, compensation expenses as well as operating expenses increased due to the employment agreements the Company entered into with its key officers and the increase in construction costs as we have begun site preparation for the toll milling facility and costs associated with permits, research and agreements.

Other Income and Expenses

Other Income

We receive monthly payments of $529 from American Tower Corporation for a cellular tower located on our Tonopah land.

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $44,479 and $136,430, respectively, compared to $93,739 and $319,220 for the respective periods in 2013. The 2014 and 2013 amounts relate primarily to the interest due on our notes payable: (i) the $2,500,000 secured, convertible promissory note issued to Pure Path on October 10, 2013 in accordance with the settlement agreement of same date. All prior debt was subsumed under this note, the outstanding of which was $2,092,097 plus accrued interest at 8% per annum on September 30, 2014; (ii) the short-term note payable; and (iii) the convertible notes issued in 2011 and 2012.

The payment of the short-term note in item (ii) and the conversion of all but $275,000 of item (iii) above contributed to the significant decreases from the 2013 amounts.

Loss on Settlement of Debt

Loss on settlement of debt for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $147,468 and $1,106,487, respectively, compared to $1,143,228 and $1,164,262 for the respective period in 2013. We have been negotiating with several previous debt holders to convert their debt to our common stock to conserve capital for building and operating expenses.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity is a measure of an entity’s ability to secure enough cash to meet its contractual and operating needs as they arise. We have funded our operations and satisfied our capital requirements through the issuance of short-term debt, convertible debt and through equity capital we have received via certain shareholders exercising their warrants during 2014 and 2013. We do not anticipate generating sufficient net positive cash flows from our operations to fund the next twelve months. We had a working capital deficit of $5,152,947 at September 30, 2014. Cash and cash equivalents were $5,791 at September 30, 2014, representing an increase of $3,350 from the cash and cash equivalents of $2,441 at September 30, 2013.

Our cash reserves will not be sufficient to meet our operational needs and thus, we need to raise additional capital to pay for our operational expenses and provide for capital expenditures. Our basic operational expenses are estimated at approximately $500,000 per month. Above the basic operational expenses, we estimate that we need approximately $9,100,000 to begin limited toll milling operations. If we are not able to raise additional working capital, we may have to cease operations altogether.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we had net cash used in operating activities of $87,109, as compared to $522,195 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 we had net cash used in investing activities of $3,183,516 and $21,000 respectively. The amount in 2014 was due to the funds required to conduct site preparation on our Tonopah, Nevada property and purchase of machinery and equipment.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, we had net cash provided by financing activities of $3,133,317 and $545,542, respectively.

The following table summarizes our debt as of September 30, 2014:

Outstanding Amount			Interest Rate			Unamortized Discounts		Accrued Interest		Maturity Date		Type
$	2,092,097	(1)		8	%	$	—	$	165,342	April 10, 2015		Convertible
$	175,000	(2)		6	%	$	—	$	34,040		(3)	Convertible

	(1)	Represents the outstanding balance of the original note payable to NJB Mining Inc. that was purchased directly by Pure Path Capital Management and restructured with their other short-term debt into the 8% Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note maturing on April 10, 2015 (for the assets located in Tonopah).
	(2)	Beginning in January 2011, we entered into various six-month convertible promissory notes convertible at a price of $0.50 per share and issued a two-year stock purchase warrant with an exercise price of $0.50 per share at a rate of 2 warrants per $1 of note.

(3)

The outstanding convertible promissory notes began maturing on July 26, 2011 through March 2, 2012. These convertible notes are currently past due and original terms apply in the default period.

Summary

Our existing sources of liquidity will not provide sufficient cash to fund operations and make the required payments on our debt service for the next twelve months. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent entirely on raising funds through the sale of equity or debt. We will continue our attempt to raise additional capital. Some of the possibilities available to us are through private equity transactions, to develop a credit facility with a lender or the exercise of options and warrants. However, such additional capital may not be available to us at acceptable terms or at all. In the event that we are unable to obtain additional capital, we would be forced to cease operations altogether.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we did not engage in any off balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of the SEC’s Regulation S-K.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative

Not Applicable.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision of, and the participation of, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based on this evaluation and taking into account that certain material weaknesses existed as of December 31, 2013, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have each concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. As a result of this conclusion, the financial statements for the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q were prepared with particular attention to the material weaknesses previously disclosed. Notwithstanding the material weaknesses in internal controls that continue to exist as of September 30, 2014, we have concluded that the financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q present fairly, the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as required for interim financial statements.

There is a small number of employees dealing with general administrative and financial matters and due to the expenses associated with increases to remediate the disclosure controls and procedures that have been identified, we did not make any changes in our internal control during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting, however, the Company will continue to seek the expertise it needs to remediate the material weaknesses at an appropriate cost benefit basis.

PART II. OTHER

INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

In the Matter of the Arbitration between Mark D. Dacko and Standard Gold, Inc.

Mark Dacko, the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer, made a Demand for Arbitration on December 21, 2012 with the American Arbitration Association for legal claims against the Company involving his previous employment. The Company and Mr. Dacko were in dispute regarding his employment with the Company, as well as the details of his termination. On December 30, 2013, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Mark Dacko.

Midwest Investment Partners, LLC v. Standard Gold Holdings, Inc.

On September 6, 2013, Midwest Investment Partners, LLC filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Evansville Division against Standard Gold Holdings, Inc. alleging a breach of the Company’s obligations under a $50,000 6% Convertible Promissory Note, dated April 5, 2011, and a $25,000 6% Convertible Promissory Note, dated September 2, 2011, by (i) failing to repay the April 5, 2011 Note when due on October 6, 2011, and (ii) failing to repay the September 2, 2011 Note when due on February 29, 2012. On January 10, 2014, Standard Gold filed its Answer with Affirmative and Other Defenses to Midwest’s Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial. On April 3, 2014, Midwest filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. On May 1, 2014, Standard Gold filed its Response in Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment. On May 7, 2014, Midwest filed its Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment. On August 28, 2014, the Court issued an Order granting Midwest’s Motion for Summary Judgment. On August 28, 2014, the Court issued a Closed Judgment in favor of Midwest and against Standard Gold. On September 11, 2014, Midwest Investment Partners, LLC filed a Motion for Attorney Fees.

Midwest Investment Partners, LLC v. Standard Metals Processing, Inc.

On March 17, 2014, Midwest Investment Partners, LLC filed suit against Standard Metals Processing, Inc. in Vanderburgh County Superior Court, Vanderburgh, Indiana, alleging that Standard Metals had wrongfully refused to remove a transfer restriction on Midwest’s shares of Standard Metals stock pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act. On March 27, 2014, Standard Metals filed a Notice of Removal of a Civil Action requesting that the case proceed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Evansville Division as an action properly removed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441 (a) and (b). On April 2, 2014, Standard Metals filed a Motion to Consolidate. On April 15, 2014, Standard Metals served and filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff’s Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial. On April 16, 2014, Midwest filed its Response in Opposition to Standard Metals’ Motion to Consolidate. On April 21, 2014, Standard Metals filed its Reply to Midwest’s Response in Opposition to Standard Metals’ Motion to Consolidate. On June 25, 2014, Midwest filed the parties’ Case Management Plan setting the timing and sequence of discovery and dispositive motions in the action, which the Court approved on July 1, 2014. Trial is set for April 17, 2015. Standard Metals Processing, Inc. intends to vigorously defend against Midwest Investment Partners, LLC’s claims.

Standard Metals Processing, Inc. v. Steven E. Flechner, and fictitious parties A-Z who are individuals, entities, corporations, trusts, organizations or others who may have been issued stock options by Plaintiff pursuant to the January 21, 2011 Plan Amendment

On April 21, 2014, Standard Metals Processing, Inc. filed a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment in the Circuit Court of Etowah County, Alabama requesting that the Court issue a declaratory judgment finding that the January 21, 2011 amendment to the Stock Option Agreement approved by the Board of Directors on March 22, 2010 was invalid because it lacked required shareholder approval and rescinding any stock option awards issued thereafter; declaring that Stephen E. Flechner’s option rights allowed only for a pro-rata portion of available options, which must include appropriate and customary restrictive legends and declaring that the fictitious parties’ option rights allowed only for a corresponding pro-rata portion; or in the alternative, declaring that Flechner and the fictitious parties’ option rights were void.

Stephen E. Flechner v. Standard Metals Processing, Inc.

On April 29, 2014, Stephen E. Flechner filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado against Standard Metals Processing, Inc. alleging that Standard Metals had refused to allow him to exercise stock options granted to him pursuant to a Stock Option Agreement, dated April 1, 2010, and a second Stock Option Agreement, dated January 21, 2011. On June 12, 2014, Standard Metals filed its Answer and a Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Stay or Transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Middle Division. On July 3, 2014, Flechner filed his Response. On July 21, 2014, Standard Metals filed its Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Stay or Transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Middle Division. On August 27, 2014, a scheduling conference was held setting the timing and sequence of discovery and dispositive motions in the action. Trial is set to commence on March 9, 2015. Standard Metals Processing, Inc. intends to vigorously defend against Stephen E. Flechner’s claims.

Deborah A. King v. Standard Metals Processing, Inc. f/k/a Standard Gold, Inc., a Nevada Corporation

On May 14, 2014, Deborah A. King filed suit against Standard Metals Processing, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. On June 25, 2014, Ms. King filed an Amended Complaint alleging that Standard Metals had refused to allow her to exercise the stock options assigned to her by her husband, Stephen King, on January 21, 2011, pursuant to a Stock Option Agreement entered into on that date by Mr. King and Standard Metals. On July 16, 2014, Standard Metals filed a Motion to Dismiss the Action or Stay the Proceeding, or, in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement. On August 1, 2014, Ms. King filed a Response to Standard Metals’ Motion. On August 6, Standard Metals filed its Reply to Ms. King’s Response. Standard Metals Processing, Inc. intends to vigorously defend against Deborah A. King’s claims.

On May 28, 2014, Stephen E. Flechner filed a Notice of Removal to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Middle Division. On May 28, 2014, Flechner also filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint for Declaratory Judgment or, in the Alternative, a Motion to Change Venue to the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. On June 10, 2014, Standard Metals Processing, Inc. filed a Motion to strike Mr. Flechner’s declaration filed as an exhibit to his Notice of Removal, and a Motion to Remand the action back to the Circuit Court of Etowah, Alabama. On June 30, 2014, Flechner filed a Response to Standard Metals’ Motion to Strike Declaration and Motion to Remand. On July 9, 2014, Standard Metals filed a Reply to Flechner’s Response to its Motion to Remand. On July 26, 2014, Flechner filed a Motion for Leave to file a Sur Reply. To date, the Court has not issued a decision on any of the aforementioned Motions. Standard Metals Processing, Inc. intends to vigorously defend against Stephen E. Flechner’s claims.

Wits Basin Precious Minerals, Inc., Lee Levine, Michael Lepore, Mark McLain, Morton Waldman, Allan Staller, Thomas McAdam, Arthur Brown, DJ Sikka and Bryan Reichel v. Standard Metals Processing, Inc., f/k/a Standard Gold, Inc., a Nevada Corporation

On September 10, 2014, Wits Basin Precious Minerals filed suit against Standard Metals Processing, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. On October 6, 2014, Standard Metals filed a First Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. On October 16, 2014, Wits Basin and the other named individual Option Holders filed an Amended Complaint alleging that Standard Metals had refused to allow Wits to exercise Options to purchase shares of the company’s stock to meet Wits’ requirements on option agreements it had with the Option Holders, pursuant to an Exchange Agreement, dated March 15, 2011, and Private Option Agreements, signed by all of the Option Holders, for shares reserved to them by the Exchange Agreement. Standard Metals Processing, Inc. intends to vigorously defend against the claims alleged by Wits Basin Precious Minerals, Inc. and the Option Holders.

Blair Mielke v. Standard Metals Processing, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and Does 1 through 20, and Roes Corporations 1 through 20, inclusive

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The most significant risk factors applicable to the Company are described in Part I Item 1A entitled “Risk Factors” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the “2013 Form 10-K”). There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in the 2012 Form 10-K. The risks described in the 2013 Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to management may materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, and/or operating results.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Conversion of Unsecured Note

Debt Settlements

On January 17, 2014, the Company entered into a Debt Settlement Agreement with a debt holder wherein a $193,910 debt was settled for 387,820 shares of restricted common stock.

On January 17, 2014, the Company entered into a Debt Settlement Agreement with a debt holder wherein a $125,000 debt was settled for 250,000 shares of restricted common stock.

On February 13, 2014, the Company entered into an Agreement with a debt holder wherein a $458,250 of Accrued Expenses was settled for 300,000 shares of restricted common stock and $21,750 was charged as stock compensation to general and administrative expense.

On March 4, 2014, the Company entered into a Debt Settlement Agreement with a debt holder wherein a $100,000 debt was settled for 200,000 shares of restricted common stock.

On April 22, 2014, the Company entered into a Debt Settlement Agreement with a debt holder wherein a $100,000 debt was settled for 112,360 shares of restricted common stock.

Warrant Exercises

During the third quarter of 2014, a total of 2,073,000 warrants to purchase common stock were exercised: 220,000 warrants were exercised at a price of $0.50 per share; 1,583,000 warrants were exercised at a price of $0.60 per share; 40,000 warrants were exercised at a price of $0.89 per share and 230,000 warrants exercised at $1.00 per share for an aggregate total of $1,325,400.

Option Grants

Issuance of Shares For Services

On June 10, 2014, the Company issued 50,000 unregistered shares of common stock to a former consultant for the settlement of consulting fees.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit		Description
31.1**		Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2**		Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1**		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2**		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

** Filed herewith electronically

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	Standard Metals Processing, Inc.

Date: November 13, 2014

	By:	/s/ Sharon L. Ullman
		Sharon L. Ullman
		Chief Executive Officer

	By:	/s/ Robert Geiges
		Robert Geiges
		Chief Financial Officer

Standard Metals Processing, Inc. - FORM 10-Q - November 13, 2014

Attached files

Standard Metals Processing, Inc. Reports