KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC.	Financial_Report.xls
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION - KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC.	kins_ex321.htm
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION - KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC.	kins_ex312.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION - KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC.	kins_ex311.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________to _________

Commission File Number 0-1665

KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		36-2476480
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

15 Joys Lane

Kingston, NY 12401

(Address of principal executive offices)

(845) 802-7900

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company þ
				(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

As of November 13, 2014, there were 7,295,364 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding

KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC.

INDEX

			PAGE

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION				2
	Item 1 —	Financial Statements		2
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2014 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2013		2
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 (Unaudited) and 2013 (Unaudited)		3
		Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 (Unaudited)		4
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 (Unaudited) and 2013 (Unaudited)		5-6
		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		7
	Item 2 —	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		32
	Item 3 —	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		60
	Item 4 —	Controls and Procedures		60

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION				61
	Item 1 —	Legal Proceedings		61
	Item 1A —	Risk Factors		61
	Item 2 —	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		61
	Item 3 —	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		61
	Item 4 —	Mine Safety Disclosures		61
	Item 5 —	Other Information		61
	Item 6 —	Exhibits		62
Signatures
EXHIBIT 3(a)
EXHIBIT 3(b)
EXHIBIT 31(a)
EXHIBIT 31(b)
EXHIBIT 32
EXHIBIT 101.INS XBRL Instance Document
EXHIBIT 101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
EXHIBIT 101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
EXHIBIT 101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
EXHIBIT 101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
EXHIBIT 101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the federal securities laws. The events described in forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report may not occur. Generally, these statements relate to business plans or strategies, projected or anticipated benefits or other consequences of our plans or strategies, projected or anticipated benefits from acquisitions to be made by us, or projections involving anticipated revenues, earnings or other aspects of our operating results. The words "may," "will," "expect," "believe," "anticipate," "project," "plan," "intend," "estimate," and "continue," and their opposites and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We caution you that these statements are not guarantees of future performance or events and are subject to a number of uncertainties, risks and other influences, many of which are beyond our control that may influence the accuracy of the statements and the projections upon which the statements are based. Factors which may affect our results include, but are not limited to, the risks and uncertainties discussed in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 under “Factors That May Affect Future Results and Financial Condition.”

Any one or more of these uncertainties, risks and other influences could materially affect our results of operations and whether forward-looking statements made by us ultimately prove to be accurate. Our actual results, performance and achievements could differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether from new information, future events or otherwise.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
	September 30,			December 31,
	2014			2013
	(unaudited)
Assets
Fixed-maturity securities, held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value of
$5,334,056 at September 30, 2014 and $2,425,261 at December 31, 2013)	$	5,125,285		$	2,399,482
Fixed-maturity securities, available-for-sale, at fair value (amortized cost of
$46,948,102 at September 30, 2014 and $28,079,902 at December 31, 2013)		47,998,898			28,436,022
Equity securities, available-for-sale, at fair value (cost of $8,857,992
at September 30, 2014 and $6,690,338 at December 31, 2013)		9,160,744			6,796,673
Total investments		62,284,927			37,632,177
Cash and cash equivalents		5,028,005			19,922,506
Premiums receivable, net of provision for uncollectible amounts		9,324,796			7,590,074
Receivables - reinsurance contracts		1,750,989			974,989
Reinsurance receivables, net of provision for uncollectible amounts		35,324,074			37,560,825
Deferred policy acquisition costs		8,644,105			6,860,263
Intangible assets, net		2,352,458			2,709,244
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation		2,475,651			2,038,755
Other assets		1,745,303			1,494,989
Total assets	$	128,930,308		$	116,783,822

Liabilities
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves	$	36,922,289		$	34,503,229
Unearned premiums		39,652,812			32,335,614
Advance premiums		1,263,129			776,099
Reinsurance balances payable		2,057,549			2,566,729
Deferred ceding commission revenue		5,688,973			6,984,166
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities		3,240,296			3,215,487
Deferred income taxes		1,103,492			693,087
Total liabilities		89,928,540			81,074,411

Commitments and Contingencies

Stockholders' Equity
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; authorized 2,500,000 shares		-			-
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized 20,000,000 shares; issued 8,221,702 shares
at September 30, 2014 and 8,186,031 shares at December 31, 2013; outstanding 7,295,364
shares at September 30, 2014 and 7,266,573 shares at December 31, 2013		82,217			81,860
Capital in excess of par		32,825,045			32,692,568
Accumulated other comprehensive income		893,340			305,219
Retained earnings		6,805,339			4,187,209
		40,605,941			37,266,856
Treasury stock, at cost, 926,338 shares at September 30, 2014 and 919,458 shares
at December 31, 2013		(1,604,173	)		(1,557,445	)
Total stockholders' equity		39,001,768			35,709,411

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	128,930,308		$	116,783,822

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
	For the Three Months Ended						For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30						September 30
	2014			2013			2014			2013

Revenues
Net premiums earned	$	9,895,000		$	6,125,584		$	22,250,684		$	15,425,081
Ceding commission revenue		3,278,319			3,611,544			10,365,651			8,239,686
Net investment income		463,513			294,348			1,294,216			852,666
Net realized gains on sales of investments		115,176			94,456			438,126			449,474
Other income		263,726			213,205			742,191			671,020
Total revenues		14,015,734			10,339,137			35,090,868			25,637,927

Expenses
Loss and loss adjustment expenses		4,538,167			2,439,132			11,871,060			8,150,570
Commission expense		3,106,064			2,563,055			8,592,364			6,757,959
Other underwriting expenses		2,845,708			2,611,736			7,656,532			6,756,692
Other operating expenses		485,959			279,214			1,074,373			750,357
Depreciation and amortization		248,888			165,524			641,943			472,495
Interest expense		-			19,188			-			58,293
Total expenses		11,224,786			8,077,849			29,836,272			22,946,366

Income from operations before taxes		2,790,948			2,261,288			5,254,596			2,691,561
Income tax expense		907,267			599,064			1,689,280			770,228
Net income		1,883,681			1,662,224			3,565,316			1,921,333

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Gross change in unrealized (losses) gains
on available-for-sale-securities		(525,622	)		(123,848	)		891,093			(938,712	)

Income tax benifit (expense) related to items
of other comprehensive income (loss)		178,711			42,041			(302,972	)		319,095
Comprehensive income	$	1,536,770		$	1,580,417		$	4,153,437		$	1,301,716

Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.26		$	0.44		$	0.49		$	0.50
Diluted	$	0.26		$	0.43		$	0.48		$	0.49

Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic		7,294,913			3,811,243			7,283,244			3,826,510
Diluted		7,378,097			3,887,840			7,360,294			3,903,427

Dividends declared and paid per common share	$	0.05		$	0.04		$	0.13		$	0.12

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity
Nine months ended September 30, 2014 (unaudited)


														Accumulated
											Capital			Other
	Preferred Stock				Common Stock						in Excess			Comprehensive		Retained			Treasury Stock
	Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount			of Par			Income		Earnings			Shares		Amount			Total
Balance, January 1, 2014		-	$	-		8,186,031		$	81,860		$	32,692,568		$	305,219	$	4,187,209			919,458	$	(1,557,445	)	$	35,709,411
Stock-based compensation		-		-		-			-			118,582			-		-			-		-			118,582
Shares deducted from exercise of stock
options for payment of withholding taxes		-		-		(9,309	)		(93	)		(66,002	)		-		-			-		-			(66,095	)
Excess tax benefit from exercise
of stock options		-		-		-			-			74,471			-		-			-		-			74,471
Exercise of stock options		-		-		44,980			450			5,426			-		-			-		-			5,876
Acquisition of treasury stock		-		-		-			-			-			-		-			6,880		(46,728	)		(46,728	)
Dividends		-		-		-			-			-			-		(947,186	)		-		-			(947,186	)
Net income		-		-		-			-			-			-		3,565,316			-		-			3,565,316
Change in unrealized gains on available-
for-sale securities, net of tax		-		-		-			-			-			588,121		-			-		-			588,121
Balance, September 30, 2014		-	$	-		8,221,702		$	82,217		$	32,825,045		$	893,340	$	6,805,339			926,338	$	(1,604,173	)	$	39,001,768

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Nine months ended September 30,	2014			2013

Cash flows provided by operating activities:
Net income	$	3,565,316		$	1,921,333
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net realized gains on sale of investments		(438,126	)		(449,474	)
Depreciation and amortization		641,943			472,495
Amortization of bond premium, net		205,107			135,352
Stock-based compensation		118,582			40,297
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options		(74,471	)		-
Deferred income tax expense		107,433			(608,825	)
(Increase) decrease in operating assets:
Premiums receivable, net		(1,734,722	)		(435,903	)
Receivables - reinsurance contracts		(776,000	)		-
Reinsurance receivables, net		2,236,751			2,778,227
Deferred policy acquisition costs		(1,783,842	)		(1,046,288	)
Other assets		(198,361	)		907,483
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves		2,419,060			(968,479	)
Unearned premiums		7,317,198			5,448,255
Advance premiums		487,030			434,752
Reinsurance balances payable		(509,180	)		1,396,703
Advance payments from catastrophe reinsurers		-			(7,358,391	)
Deferred ceding commission revenue		(1,295,193	)		1,703,364
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities		24,809			804,203
Net cash flows provided by operating activities		10,313,334			5,175,104

Cash flows used in investing activities:
Purchase - fixed-maturity securities held-to-maturity		(2,715,540	)		(842,317	)
Purchase - fixed-maturity securities available-for-sale		(24,041,145	)		(5,253,804	)
Purchase - equity securities available-for-sale		(7,453,247	)		(5,081,161	)
Sale or maturity - fixed-maturity securities available-for-sale		5,092,195			5,274,520
Sale - equity securities available-for-sale		5,537,511			3,747,729
Recovery of loss from failed bank		51,587			-
Other investing activities		(699,534	)		(243,785	)
Net cash flows used in investing activities		(24,228,173	)		(2,398,818	)

Cash flows used in financing activities:
Proceeds from line of credit		-			310,000
Principal payments on line of credit		-			(550,000	)
Principal payments on notes payable (includes $378,000 to related parties)		-			-
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		5,876			-
Withholding taxes paid on net exercise of stock options		(66,095	)		-
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options		74,471			-
Purchase of treasury stock		(46,728	)		(129,900	)
Dividends paid		(947,186	)		(459,738	)
Net cash flows used in financing activities		(979,662	)		(829,638	)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Nine months ended September 30,	2014			2013

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	(14,894,501	)	$	1,946,648
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		19,922,506			2,240,012
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	5,028,005		$	4,186,660

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for income taxes	$	1,712,400		$	747,000
Cash paid for interest	$	-		$	76,100

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Value of shares deducted from exercise of stock options for payment of withholding taxes	$	66,095		$	-

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1 - Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation

Kingstone Companies, Inc. (referred to herein as "Kingstone" or the “Company”), through its wholly owned subsidiary Kingstone Insurance Company (“KICO”), underwrites property and casualty insurance to small businesses and individuals exclusively through independent agents and brokers. KICO is a licensed insurance company in the State of New York. KICO has also obtained a license to write insurance in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; however, KICO has only nominally commenced writing business in Pennsylvania. Kingstone, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Payments, Inc., a licensed premium finance company in the State of New York, receives fees for placing contracts with a third party licensed premium finance company (see Note 12 – Premium Finance Placement Fees).

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the instructions to Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Form 10-Q and Article 8-03 of SEC Regulation S-X. The principles for condensed interim financial information do not require the inclusion of all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. Therefore, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013 and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2014. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) but, in the opinion of management, such financial statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s financial position and results of operations. The results of operations for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2014 may not be indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014.

Note 2 – Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates and assumptions, which include the reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses, are subject to considerable estimation error due to the inherent uncertainty in projecting ultimate claim amounts that will be reported and settled over a period of several years. In addition, estimates and assumptions associated with receivables under reinsurance contracts related to contingent ceding commission revenue require considerable judgment by management. On an on-going basis, management reevaluates its assumptions and the methods of calculating its estimates. Actual results may differ significantly from the estimates and assumptions used in preparing the consolidated financial statements.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements consist of Kingstone and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Subsidiaries include: (1) KICO and its wholly owned subsidiaries, CMIC Properties, Inc. (“Properties”) and 15 Joys Lane, LLC (“15 Joys Lane”), which together own the land and building from which KICO operates, and (2) Payments Inc. All significant inter-company transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. This ASU revised guidance to only allow disposals of components of an entity that represent a strategic shift (e.g., disposal of a major geographical area, a major line of business, a major equity method investment, or other major parts of an entity) and that have a major effect on a reporting entity’s operations and financial results to be reported as discontinued operations. The revised guidance also requires expanded disclosure in the financial statements for discontinued operations as well as for disposals of significant components of an entity that do not qualify for discontinued operations presentation. This ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014. The Company is evaluating whether the adoption of ASU 2014-08 will have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In May 2014, FASB issued guidance to change the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers. The core principle of the new guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to reflect the transfer of goods and services to customers in an amount equal to the consideration the entity receives or expects to receive. The guidance will be effective for the Company for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company will apply the guidance using a modified retrospective approach. The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial statements.

The Company has determined that all other recently issued accounting pronouncements will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows, or do not apply to its operations.

Note 3 - Investments

Available-for-Sale Securities

The amortized cost and fair value of investments in available-for-sale fixed-maturity securities and equity securities as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are summarized as follows:

	September 30, 2014
													Net
	Cost or		Gross		Gross Unrealized Losses								Unrealized
	Amortized		Unrealized		Less than 12			More than 12			Fair		Gains/
Category	Cost		Gains		Months			Months			Value		(Losses)

Fixed-Maturity Securities:
Political subdivisions of States,
Territories and Possessions	$	13,807,507	$	430,058	$	(38,144	)	$	(6,818	)	$	14,192,603	$	385,096

Corporate and other bonds
Industrial and miscellaneous		33,140,595		823,439		(106,702	)		(51,037	)		33,806,295		665,700
Total fixed-maturity securities		46,948,102		1,253,497		(144,846	)		(57,855	)		47,998,898		1,050,796

Equity Securities:
Preferred stocks		3,172,632		15,581		(6,022	)		(82,377	)		3,099,814		(72,818	)
Common stocks		5,685,360		427,462		(51,892	)		-			6,060,930		375,570
Total equity securities		8,857,992		443,043		(57,914	)		(82,377	)		9,160,744		302,752

Total	$	55,806,094	$	1,696,540	$	(202,760	)	$	(140,232	)	$	57,159,642	$	1,353,548

	December 31, 2013
													Net
	Cost or		Gross		Gross Unrealized Losses								Unrealized
	Amortized		Unrealized		Less than 12			More than 12			Fair		Gains/
Category	Cost		Gains		Months			Months			Value		(Losses)

Fixed-Maturity Securities:
Political subdivisions of States,
Territories and Possessions	$	7,000,222	$	162,616	$	(49,491	)	$	(45,140	)	$	7,068,207	$	67,985

Corporate and other bonds
Industrial and miscellaneous		21,079,680		569,139		(179,810	)		(101,194	)		21,367,815		288,135
Total fixed-maturity securities		28,079,902		731,755		(229,301	)		(146,334	)		28,436,022		356,120

Equity Securities:
Preferred stocks		2,899,301		2,503		(251,525	)		(62,551	)		2,587,728		(311,573	)
Common stocks		3,791,037		470,606		(38,785	)		(13,913	)		4,208,945		417,908
Total equity securities		6,690,338		473,109		(290,310	)		(76,464	)		6,796,673		106,335

Total	$	34,770,240	$	1,204,864	$	(519,611	)	$	(222,798	)	$	35,232,695	$	462,455

A summary of the amortized cost and fair value of the Company’s investments in available-for-sale fixed-maturity securities by contractual maturity as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 is shown below:

	September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Amortized				Amortized
Remaining Time to Maturity	Cost		Fair Value		Cost		Fair Value

Less than one year	$	484,779	$	490,726	$	758,281	$	768,954
One to five years		10,288,457		10,698,522		9,025,386		9,466,973
Five to ten years		30,053,300		30,570,369		14,070,003		14,114,271
More than 10 years		6,121,566		6,239,281		4,226,232		4,085,824
Total	$	46,948,102	$	47,998,898	$	28,079,902	$	28,436,022

The actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalties.

Held-to-Maturity Securities

The amortized cost and fair value of investments in held-to-maturity fixed-maturity securities as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are summarized as follows:

	September 30, 2014
													Net
	Cost or		Gross		Gross Unrealized Losses								Unrealized
	Amortized		Unrealized		Less than 12			More than 12			Fair		Gains/
Category	Cost		Gains		Months			Months			Value		(Losses)

U.S. Treasury securities	$	606,344	$	126,344	$	-		$	-		$	732,688	$	126,344

Political subdivisions of States,
Territories and Possessions		1,412,284		42,046		-			(10,068	)		1,444,262		31,978

Corporate and other bonds
Industrial and miscellaneous		3,106,657		74,332		(23,880	)		-			3,157,106		50,449

Total	$	5,125,285	$	242,722	$	(23,880	)	$	(10,068	)	$	5,334,056	$	208,771

	December 31, 2013
												Net
	Cost or		Gross		Gross Unrealized Losses							Unrealized
	Amortized		Unrealized		Less than 12			More than 12		Fair		Gains/
Category	Cost		Gains		Months			Months		Value		(Losses)

U.S. Treasury securities	$	606,138	$	46,915	$	-		$	-	$	653,053	$	46,915

Political subdivisions of States,
Territories and Possessions		208,697		-		(25,359	)		-		183,338		(25,359	)

Corporate and other bonds
Industrial and miscellaneous		1,584,647		4,223		-			-		1,588,870		4,223

Total	$	2,399,482	$	51,138	$	(25,359	)	$	-	$	2,425,261	$	25,779

Held-to-maturity securities U.S. Treasury securities are held in trust pursuant to the New York State Department of Financial Services’ minimum funds requirement.

A summary of the amortized cost and fair value of the Company’s investments in held-to-maturity securities by contractual maturity as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 is shown below:

	September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Amortized				Amortized
Remaining Time to Maturity	Cost		Fair Value		Cost		Fair Value

Less than one year	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
One to five years		-		-		-		-
Five to ten years		3,318,492		3,358,874		1,793,344		1,772,208
More than 10 years		1,806,793		1,975,182		606,138		653,053
Total	$	5,125,285	$	5,334,056	$	2,399,482	$	2,425,261

Investment Income

Major categories of the Company’s net investment income are summarized as follows:

	Three months ended					Nine months ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2014		2013			2014		2013

Income:
Fixed-maturity securities	$	433,028	$	241,286		$	1,182,083	$	736,298
Equity securities		116,683		117,916			372,901		297,760
Cash and cash equivalents		232		1			23,672		30
Other		-		(1,066	)		594		10,751
Total		549,943		358,137			1,579,250		1,044,839
Expenses:
Investment expenses		86,430		63,789			285,034		192,173
Net investment income	$	463,513	$	294,348		$	1,294,216	$	852,666

Proceeds from the sale and maturity of fixed-maturity securities were $5,092,195 and $5,274,520 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Proceeds from the sale of equity securities were $5,537,511 and $3,747,729 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The Company’s net realized gains on investments are summarized as follows:

	Three months ended						Nine months ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013

Fixed-maturity securities:
Gross realized gains	$	25,870		$	56,669		$	183,349		$	237,886
Gross realized losses		(20,436	)		-			(48,729	)		(56,471	)
		5,434			56,669			134,620			181,415

Equity securities:
Gross realized gains		77,535			79,593			294,786			369,582
Gross realized losses		(19,380	)		(41,806	)		(42,867	)		(101,523	)
		58,155			37,787			251,919			268,059

Cash and short term investments (1)		51,587			-			51,587			-

Net realized gains	$	115,176		$	94,456		$	438,126		$	449,474

(1) Realized gain on cash and short term investments is a partial recovery from the FDIC of an amount previously written off in 2009 due to the failure of Waterfield Bank.

Impairment Review

Impairment of investment securities results in a charge to operations when a market decline to below cost is deemed to be other-than-temporary. The Company regularly reviews its fixed-maturity securities and equity securities portfolios to evaluate the necessity of recording impairment losses for other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of investments. In evaluating potential impairment, GAAP specifies (i) if the Company does not have the intent to sell a debt security prior to recovery and (ii) it is more likely than not that it will not have to sell the debt security prior to recovery, the security would not be considered other-than-temporarily impaired unless there is a credit loss. When the Company does not intend to sell the security and it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis, it will recognize the credit component of an other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) of a debt security in earnings and the remaining portion in other comprehensive income. The credit loss component recognized in earnings is identified as the amount of principal cash flows not expected to be received over the remaining term of the security as projected based on cash flow projections. For held-to-maturity debt securities, the amount of OTTI recorded in other comprehensive income for the noncredit portion of a previous OTTI is amortized prospectively over the remaining life of the security on the basis of timing of future estimated cash flows of the security.

OTTI losses are recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income as net realized losses on investments and result in a permanent reduction of the cost basis of the underlying investment. The determination of OTTI is a subjective process and different judgments and assumptions could affect the timing of loss realization. At September 30, 2014, there were 38 securities that accounted for the gross unrealized loss. The Company determined that none of the unrealized losses were deemed to be OTTI for its portfolio of fixed-maturity securities and equity securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. Significant factors influencing the Company’s determination that unrealized losses were temporary included the magnitude of the unrealized losses in relation to each security’s cost, the nature of the investment and management’s intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery of fair value to the Company’s cost basis.

The Company held securities with unrealized losses representing declines that were considered temporary at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 as follows:

	September 30, 2014
	Less than 12 months							12 months or more							Total
						No. of							No. of		Aggregate
	Fair		Unrealized			Positions		Fair		Unrealized			Positions		Fair		Unrealized
Category	Value		Losses			Held		Value		Losses			Held		Value		Losses

Fixed-Maturity Securities:
Political subdivisions of
States, Territories and
Possessions	$	2,149,022	$	(38,144	)		7	$	541,806	$	(6,818	)		2	$	2,690,828	$	(44,962	)

Corporate and other
bonds industrial and
miscellaneous		6,040,156		(106,702	)		12		993,653		(51,037	)		3		7,033,809		(157,739	)

Total fixed-maturity
securities	$	8,189,178	$	(144,846	)		19	$	1,535,459	$	(57,855	)		5	$	9,724,637	$	(202,701	)

Equity Securities:
Preferred stocks	$	652,950	$	(6,022	)		1	$	1,688,024	$	(82,377	)		7	$	2,340,974	$	(88,399	)
Common stocks		1,541,225		(51,892	)		6		-		-			-		1,541,225		(51,892	)

Total equity securities	$	2,194,175	$	(57,914	)		7	$	1,688,024	$	(82,377	)		7	$	3,882,199	$	(140,291	)

Total	$	10,383,353	$	(202,760	)		26	$	3,223,483	$	(140,232	)		12	$	13,606,836	$	(342,992	)

	December 31, 2013
	Less than 12 months							12 months or more							Total
						No. of							No. of		Aggregate
	Fair		Unrealized			Positions		Fair		Unrealized			Positions		Fair		Unrealized
Category	Value		Losses			Held		Value		Losses			Held		Value		Losses

Fixed-Maturity Securities:
Political subdivisions of
States, Territories and
Possessions	$	2,015,437	$	(49,491	)		6	$	415,866	$	(45,140	)		2	$	2,431,303	$	(94,631	)

Corporate and other
bonds industrial and
miscellaneous		6,447,605		(179,810	)		24		1,430,377		(101,194	)		5		7,877,982		(281,004	)

Total fixed-maturity
securities	$	8,463,042	$	(229,301	)		30	$	1,846,243	$	(146,334	)		7	$	10,309,285	$	(375,635	)

Equity Securities:
Preferred stocks	$	1,835,958	$	(251,525	)		8	$	444,100	$	(62,551	)		2	$	2,280,058	$	(314,076	)
Common stocks		879,525		(38,785	)		4		145,625		(13,913	)		1		1,025,150		(52,698	)

Total equity securities	$	2,715,483	$	(290,310	)		12	$	589,725	$	(76,464	)		3	$	3,305,208	$	(366,774	)

Total	$	11,178,525	$	(519,611	)		42	$	2,435,968	$	(222,798	)		10	$	13,614,493	$	(742,409	)

Note 4 - Fair Value Measurements

The Company follows GAAP guidance regarding fair value measurements. The valuation technique used to fair value the financial instruments is the market approach which uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets.

This guidance establishes a three-level hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). If the inputs used to measure the assets or liabilities fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the asset or liability. Classification of assets and liabilities within the hierarchy considers the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded, including during period of market disruption, and the reliability and transparency of the assumptions used to determine fair value. The hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. The levels of the hierarchy and those investments included in each are as follows:

Level 1—Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets. Included are those investments traded on an active exchange, such as the NASDAQ Global Select Market, U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies, together with corporate debt securities that are generally investment grade.

Level 2—Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and market-corroborated inputs. Municipal and corporate bonds that are traded in less active markets are classified as Level 2. These securities are valued using market price quotations for recently executed transactions.

Level 3—Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable for the asset or liability and are significant to the fair value measurement. Material assumptions and factors considered in pricing investment securities and other assets may include appraisals, projected cash flows, market clearing activity or liquidity circumstances in the security or similar securities that may have occurred since the prior pricing period.

The availability of observable inputs varies and is affected by a wide variety of factors. When the valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires significantly more judgment. The degree of judgment exercised by management in determining fair value is greatest for investments categorized as Level 3. For investments in this category, the Company considers prices and inputs that are current as of the measurement date. In periods of market dislocation, as characterized by current market conditions, the ability to observe prices and inputs may be reduced for many instruments. This condition could cause a security to be reclassified between levels.

The Company’s investments are allocated among pricing input levels at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 as follows:

	September 30, 2014
($ in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total

Fixed-maturity securities available for sale
Political subdivisions of
States, Territories and
Possessions	$	-	$	14,193	$	-	$	14,193

Corporate and other
bonds industrial and
miscellaneous		26,169		7,637		-		33,806
Total fixed maturities		26,169		21,830		-		47,999
Equity securities		9,161		-		-		9,161
Total investments	$	35,330	$	21,830	$	-	$	57,160

	December 31, 2013
($ in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total

Fixed-maturity securities available for sale
Political subdivisions of
States, Territories and
Possessions	$	-	$	7,068	$	-	$	7,068

Corporate and other
bonds industrial and
miscellaneous		20,731		637		-		21,368
Total fixed maturities		20,731		7,705		-		28,436
Equity securities		6,797		-		-		6,797
Total investments	$	27,528	$	7,705	$	-	$	35,233

Note 5 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments

GAAP requires all entities to disclose the fair value of financial instruments, both assets and liabilities recognized and not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. The Company uses the following methods and assumptions in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:

Equity securities and fixed income securities available-for-sale: Fair value disclosures for these investments are included in “Note 3 - Investments.”

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.

Premiums receivable and reinsurance receivables: The carrying values reported in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets for these financial instruments approximate their fair values due to the short-term nature of the assets.

Real estate: The fair value of the land and building included in property and equipment, which is used in the Company’s operations, approximates the carrying value. The fair value was based on an appraisal prepared using the sales comparison approach, and accordingly the real estate is a Level 3 asset under the fair value hierarchy.

Reinsurance balances payable: The carrying value reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets for these financial instruments approximates fair value.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows:

	September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value

Fixed-maturity securities held-to-maturity	$	5,125,285	$	5,334,056	$	2,399,482	$	2,425,261
Cash and cash equivalents		5,028,005		5,028,005		19,922,506		19,922,506
Premiums receivable		9,324,796		9,324,796		7,590,074		7,590,074
Receivables - reinsurance contracts		1,750,989		1,750,989		974,989		974,989
Reinsurance receivables		35,324,074		35,324,074		37,560,825		37,560,825
Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation		1,775,839		1,816,122		1,777,942		1,816,122
Reinsurance balances payable		2,057,549		2,057,549		2,566,729		2,566,729

Note 6 – Property and Casualty Insurance Activity

Premiums Earned

Premiums written, ceded and earned are as follows:

	Direct			Assumed			Ceded			Net

Nine months ended September 30, 2014
Premiums written	$	56,729,057		$	39,263		$	(24,013,732	)	$	32,754,588
Change in unearned premiums		(7,311,116	)		(6,082	)		(3,186,706	)		(10,503,904	)
Premiums earned	$	49,417,941		$	33,181		$	(27,200,438	)	$	22,250,684

Nine months ended September 30, 2013
Premiums written	$	44,651,570		$	36,999		$	(26,567,984	)	$	18,120,585
Change in unearned premiums		(5,465,632	)		17,377			2,752,751			(2,695,504	)
Premiums earned	$	39,185,938		$	54,376		$	(23,815,233	)	$	15,425,081

Three months ended September 30, 2014
Premiums written	$	20,131,112		$	22,961		$	(2,485,929	)	$	17,668,144
Change in unearned premiums		(2,438,306	)		(12,433	)		(5,322,405	)		(7,773,144	)
Premiums earned	$	17,692,806		$	10,528		$	(7,808,334	)	$	9,895,000

Three months ended September 30, 2013
Premiums written	$	15,925,613		$	16,952		$	(8,786,730	)	$	7,155,835
Change in unearned premiums		(2,013,499	)		(11,192	)		994,440			(1,030,251	)
Premiums earned	$	13,912,114		$	5,760		$	(7,792,290	)	$	6,125,584

Premium receipts in advance of the policy effective date are recorded as advance premiums. The balance of advance premiums as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was approximately $1,263,000 and $776,000, respectively.

Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expense (“LAE”) reserves:

	Nine months ended
	September 30,
	2014			2013

Balance at beginning of period	$	34,503,229		$	30,485,532
Less reinsurance recoverables		(17,363,975	)		(18,419,694	)
Net balance, beginning of period		17,139,254			12,065,838

Incurred related to:
Current year		11,043,919			7,467,756
Prior years		827,141			682,814
Total incurred		11,871,060			8,150,570

Paid related to:
Current year		4,725,526			2,458,940
Prior years		4,834,120			3,498,333
Total paid		9,559,646			5,957,273

Net balance at end of period		19,450,668			14,259,135
Add reinsurance recoverables		17,471,621			15,257,918
Balance at end of period	$	36,922,289		$	29,517,053

Incurred losses and LAE are net of reinsurance recoveries under reinsurance contracts of $11,881,366 and $12,170,056 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Prior year incurred loss and LAE development is based upon estimates by line of business and accident year. The Company’s management continually monitors claims activity to assess the appropriateness of carried case and incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) reserves, giving consideration to Company and industry trends.

The reserving process for loss adjustment expense reserves provides for the Company’s best estimate at a particular point in time of the ultimate unpaid cost of all losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred, including settlement and administration of losses, and is based on facts and circumstances then known and including losses that have been incurred but not yet been reported. The process includes using actuarial methodologies to assist in establishing these estimates, judgments relative to estimates of future claims severity and frequency, the length of time before losses will develop to their ultimate level and the possible changes in the law and other external factors that are often beyond the Company’s control. Several actuarial reserving methodologies are used to estimate required loss reserves. The process produces carried reserves set by management based upon the actuaries’ best estimate and is the result of numerous best estimates made by line of business, accident year, and loss and loss adjustment expense. The amount of loss and loss adjustment expense reserves for reported claims (“case reserve”) is based primarily upon a case-by-case evaluation of coverage, liability, injury severity, and any other information considered pertinent to estimating the exposure presented by the claim. The amounts of loss and loss adjustment expense reserves for unreported claims and development on known claims (incurred but not reported reserves) are determined using historical information by line of insurance as adjusted to current conditions. Since this process produces loss reserves set by management based upon the actuaries’ best estimate, there is no explicit or implicit provision for uncertainty in the carried loss reserves.

Due to the inherent uncertainty associated with the reserving process, the ultimate liability may differ, perhaps substantially, from the original estimate. Such estimates are regularly reviewed and updated and any resulting adjustments are included in the current year’s results. Reserves are closely monitored and are recomputed periodically using the most recent information on reported claims and a variety of statistical techniques. On at least a quarterly basis, the Company reviews by line of business existing reserves, new claims, changes to existing case reserves and paid losses with respect to the current and prior years. Several methods are used, varying by product line and accident year, in order to select the estimated year-end loss reserves. These methods include the following:

Paid Loss Development – historical patterns of paid loss development are used to project future paid loss emergence in order to estimate required reserves.

Incurred Loss Development – historical patterns of incurred loss development, reflecting both paid losses and changes in case reserves, are used to project future incurred loss emergence in order to estimate required reserves.

Paid Bornhuetter-Ferguson (“BF”) – an estimated loss ratio for a particular accident year is determined, and is weighted against the portion of the accident year claims that have been paid, based on historical paid loss development patterns. The estimate of required reserves assumes that the remaining unpaid portion of a particular accident year will pay out at a rate consistent with the estimated loss ratio for that year. This method can be useful for situations where an unusually high or low amount of paid losses exists at the early stages of the claims development process.

Incurred Bornhuetter-Ferguson (“BF”) - an estimated loss ratio for a particular accident year is determined, and is weighted against the portion of the accident year claims that have been reported, based on historical incurred loss development patterns. The estimate of required reserves assumes that the remaining unreported portion of a particular accident year will pay out at a rate consistent with the estimated loss ratio for that year. This method can be useful for situations where an unusually high or low amount of reported losses exists at the early stages of the claims development process.

Management’s best estimate of required reserves is generally based on an average of the methods above, with appropriate weighting of the various methods based on the line of business and accident year being projected. In some cases, additional methods or historical data from industry sources are employed to supplement the projections derived from the methods listed above.

Two key assumptions that materially affect the estimate of loss reserves are the loss ratio estimate for the current accident year used in the BF methods described above, and the loss development factor selections used in the loss development methods described above. The loss ratio estimates used in the BF methods are selected after reviewing historical accident year loss ratios adjusted for rate changes, trend, and mix of business.

The Company is not aware of any claims trends that have emerged or that would cause future adverse development that have not already been considered in existing case reserves and in its current loss development factors.

In New York State, lawsuits for negligence are subject to certain limitations and must be commenced within three years from the date of the accident or are otherwise barred. Accordingly, the Company’s exposure to ‘pure’ IBNR for accident years 2010 and prior is limited although there remains the possibility of adverse development on reported claims (‘case development’ IBNR).

The Company was previously a one-third participant in a pool arrangement. Effective November 1, 1997, the Company withdrew from its participation in the pool arrangement. Accordingly, the Company will only be participating in losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses that occurred prior to that date.

Reinsurance

The Company’s quota share reinsurance treaties in effect for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 for its Personal Lines business, which primarily consists of homeowners’ policies, were covered under the July 1, 2013/June 30, 2014 and July 1, 2014/June 30, 2015 treaty years. The Company’s quota share reinsurance treaty in effect for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 for its Commercial Lines business was covered under the July 1, 2013/June 30, 2014 treaty year. The Company did not renew its expiring Commercial Lines quota share reinsurance treaty on July 1, 2014. The Company’s quota share reinsurance treaties in effect for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 for both its Personal Lines business and Commercial Lines business were covered under the July 1, 2012/June 30, 2013 and July 1, 2013/June 30, 2014 treaty years. The Company’s personal lines quota share treaty that covered the July 1, 2013/June 30, 2014 treaty year is a two year treaty expiring on June 30, 2015. Effective as of July 1, 2014, the Company had the option to increase the quota share percentage from 75% to a maximum of 85% or decrease the quota share percentage from 75% to a minimum of 55% by giving no less than 30 days advance notice. On May 12, 2014, the Company notified the personal lines reinsurers of its election to reduce the ceding percentage in the personal lines quota share treaty from 75% to 55% effective July 1, 2014. In addition to the change in the personal lines quota share treaty discussed above, the Company entered into new annual treaties with different terms effective July 1, 2014. The Company’s treaties for the July 1, 2012/June 30, 2013, July 1, 2013/ June 30, 2014 and July 1, 2014/June 30, 2015 treaty years provide for the following material terms:

	Treaty Year
	July 1, 2014			July 1, 2013			July 1, 2012
	to			to			to
Line of Busines	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013

Personal Lines:
Homeowners, dwelling fire and canine legal liability
Quota share treaty:
Percent ceded		55	%		75	%		75	%
Risk retained	$	360,000		$	300,000		$	250,000
Losses per occurrence subject to quota share reinsurance coverage	$	800,000		$	1,200,000		$	1,000,000
Excess of loss coverage above quota share coverage	$	3,200,000		$	1,700,000		$	1,900,000
	in excess of			in excess of			in excess of
	$	800,000		$	1,200,000		$	1,000,000
Total reinsurance coverage per occurrence	$	3,640,000		$	2,600,000		$	2,650,000
Losses per occurrence subject to reinsurance coverage	$	4,000,000		$	2,900,000		$	2,900,000
Expiration date	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2015			June 30, 2013

Personal Umbrella
Quota share treaty:
Percent ceded - first million dollars of coverage		90	%		90	%		90	%
Percent ceded - excess of one million dollars of coverage		100	%		100	%		100	%
Total reinsurance coverage per occurrence	$	2,900,000		$	1,900,000		$	1,900,000
Losses per occurrence subject to quota share reinsurance coverage	$	3,000,000		$	2,000,000		$	2,000,000
Expiration date	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013

Commercial Lines:
General liability commercial policies, except for commercial auto
Quota share treaty:
Percent ceded (terminated effective July 1, 2014)	None				25	%		40	%
Risk retained	$	400,000		$	300,000		$	300,000
Losses per occurrence subject to quota share reinsurance coverage	None			$	400,000		$	500,000
Excess of loss coverage above quota share coverage	$	3,600,000		$	2,500,000		$	2,400,000
	in excess of			in excess of			in excess of
	$	400,000		$	400,000		$	500,000
Total reinsurance coverage per occurrence	$	3,600,000		$	2,600,000		$	2,600,000
Losses per occurrence subject to reinsurance coverage	$	4,000,000		$	2,900,000		$	2,900,000

Commercial Auto:
Excess of loss coverage in excess of risk retained	$	1,700,000		$	1,700,000		$	1,750,000
	in excess of			in excess of			in excess of
	$	300,000		$	300,000		$	250,000
Catastrophe Reinsurance:
Initial loss subject to personal lines quota share treaty	$	4,000,000		$	4,000,000		$	3,000,000
Risk retained per catastrophe occurrence (1)	$	1,800,000		$	1,000,000		$	750,000
Catastrophe loss coverage in excess of quota share coverage (2) (3)	$	137,000,000		$	86,000,000		$	70,000,000

(1)	Plus losses in excess of catastrophe coverage.

(2)

Effective July 1, 2014, the Company’s catastrophe treaty also covers losses caused by severe winter weather during any consecutive 28 day period. Effective July 1, 2014, the duration of a catastrophe occurrence from windstorm, hail, tornado, hurricane and cyclone has been extended to 96 consecutive hours from 72 consecutive hours.

(3)	Catastrophe coverage is limited on an annual basis to two times the per occurrence amounts.

The single maximum risks per occurrence to which the Company is subject under the treaties that expired on June 30, 2014 and the new treaties effective July 1, 2014 are as follows:

	July 1, 2014 - June 30, 2015		July 1, 2013 - June 30, 2014
Treaty	Extent of Loss	Risk Retained	Extent of Loss	Risk Retained
Personal Lines	Initial $800,000	$360,000	Initial $1,200,000	$300,000
	$800,000 - $4,000,000	None(1)	$1,200,000 - $2,900,000	None(1)
	Over $4,000,000	100%	Over $2,900,000	100%

Personal Umbrella	Initial $1,000,000	$100,000	Initial $1,000,000	$100,000
	$1,000,000 - $3,000,000	None(1)	$1,000,000 - $2,000,000	None(1)
	Over $3,000,000	100%	Over $2,000,000	100%

Commercial Lines	Initial $400,000	$400,000	Initial $400,000	$300,000
	$400,000 - $4,000,000	None(1)	$400,000 - $2,900,000	None(1)
	Over $4,000,000	100%	Over $2,900,000	100%

Commercial Auto	Initial $300,000	$300,000	Initial $300,000	$300,000
	$300,000 - $2,000,000	None(1)	$300,000 - $2,000,000	None(1)
	Over $2,000,000	100%	Over $2,000,000	100%

Catastrophe (2)	Initial $4,000,000	$1,800,000	Initial $4,000,000	$1,000,000
	$4,000,000 - $141,000,000	None	$4,000,000 - $90,000,000	None
	Over $141,000,000	100%	Over $90,000,000	100%

________________

(1)	Covered by excess of loss treaties.

(2)	Catastrophe coverage is limited on an annual basis to two times the per occurrence amounts.

The Company’s reinsurance program is structured to enable the Company to significantly grow its premium volume while maintaining regulatory capital and other financial ratios generally within or below the expected ranges used for regulatory oversight purposes. The reinsurance program also provides income as a result of ceding commissions earned pursuant to the quota share reinsurance contracts. The Company’s participation in reinsurance arrangements does not relieve the Company of its obligations to policyholders.

Ceding Commission Revenue

The Company earns ceding commission revenue under its quota share reinsurance agreements based on: (i) a fixed provisional commission rate at which provisional ceding commissions are earned, and (ii) a sliding scale of commission rates and ultimate treaty year loss ratios on the policies reinsured under each of these agreements based upon which contingent ceding commissions are earned. The sliding scale includes minimum and maximum commission rates in relation to specified ultimate loss ratios. The commission rate and contingent ceding commissions earned increases when the estimated ultimate loss ratio decreases and, conversely, the commission rate and contingent ceding commissions earned decreases when the estimated ultimate loss ratio increases.

The Company’s estimated ultimate treaty year loss ratios for treaties in effect for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2014 are attributable to contracts for the July 1, 2014/June 30, 2015 treaty year (“2014/2015 Treaties”) and the July 1, 2013/June 30, 2014 treaty year (“2013/2014 Treaties”). The Company’s estimated ultimate treaty year loss ratios for treaties in effect for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2013 are attributable to contracts for the July 1, 2012/June 30, 2013 treaty year (“2012/2013 Treaties”) and the 2013/2014 Treaties.

Treaties in effect for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2014

The Company’s estimated ultimate loss ratios (“Loss Ratios”) for the period July 1, 2014 through September 30, 2014, which are attributable to contracts for the 2014/2015 Treaties were lower than the contractual Loss Ratios at which the provisional ceding commissions are earned. Accordingly, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded contingent ceding commission earned with respect to the 2014/2015 Treaties.

The Company’s estimated ultimate Loss Ratios for the period January 1, 2014 through September 30, 2014 attributable to contracts for the 2013/2014 Treaties were lower than the contractual Loss Ratios at which the provisional ceding commissions are earned. Accordingly, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded contingent ceding commission earned with respect to the 2013/2014 Treaties.

Treaties in effect for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2013

The Company’s estimated ultimate Loss Ratios for the period July 1, 2013 through September 30, 2013, which are attributable to contracts for the 2013/2014 Treaties, were lower than the contractual Loss Ratios at which the provisional ceding commissions were earned. Accordingly, for the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company’s recorded contingent ceding commission earned with respect to the 2013/2014 Treaties.

The Company’s estimated ultimate Loss Ratios for the period January 1, 2013 through September 30, 2013 attributable to contracts for the 2012/2013 Treaties were greater than the contractual Loss Ratios at which the provisional ceding commissions were earned. Accordingly, for the nine months September 30, 2013, the Company recorded negative contingent ceding commissions earned with respect to the 2012/2013 Treaties.

In addition to the treaties that were in effect for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the estimated ultimate loss ratios from prior years’ treaties are subject to change as loss reserves from those periods increase or decrease, resulting in an increase or decrease in the commission rate and contingent ceding commissions earned.

Ceding commissions earned consists of the following:

	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013

Provisional ceding commissions earned	$	2,653,690	$	2,940,661	$	9,660,437	$	7,836,370
Contingent ceding commissions earned		624,629		670,883		705,214		403,316
	$	3,278,319	$	3,611,544	$	10,365,651	$	8,239,686

Provisional ceding commissions are settled monthly. Balances due from reinsurers for contingent ceding commissions on quota share treaties are settled annually based on the loss ratio of each treaty year that ends on June 30. As discussed above, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recorded negative contingent ceding commissions earned with respect to the 2012/2013 Treaties, which resulted in ceding commissions payable to reinsurers. There was no net contingent ceding commissions payable to reinsurers as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Note 7 – Bank Line of Credit

On December 27, 2011, Kingstone executed a Promissory Note pursuant to a line of credit (together, the “Trustco Agreement”) with Trustco Bank (“Lender”). Under the Trustco Agreement, Kingstone may receive advances from Lender not to exceed an unpaid principal balance of $500,000 (the “Credit Limit”). On January 25, 2013, the Credit Limit was increased to $600,000. Advances extended under the Trustco Agreement will bear interest at a floating rate based on the Lender’s prime rate, which was 3.75% at September 30, 2014.

Interest only payments are due monthly. The principal balance is payable on demand, and must be reduced to zero for a minimum of thirty consecutive days during each year of the term of the Trustco Agreement. The line of credit is subject annual renewal at the discretion of the Lender. Lender may set off any depository accounts maintained by Kingstone that are held by Lender. Payment of amounts due pursuant to the Trustco Agreement is secured by all of Kingstone’s cash and deposit accounts, receivables, inventory and fixed assets, and is guaranteed by Kingstone’s subsidiary, Payments, Inc.

The line of credit will be used for general corporate purposes.

There were no outstanding balances under the bank line of credit as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The weighted average interest rate on the amount outstanding during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was 0% and 3.75%, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on the amount outstanding during the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was 0% and 3.75%, respectively. There are no other fees in connection with this credit line. Interest expense on the line of credit for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was approximately $-0- and $5,000, respectively.

Note 8 – Stockholders’ Equity

Dividend Declared

Dividends declared and paid on Common Stock were $947,186 and $459,738 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Dividends declared and paid on Common Stock were $364,747 and $152,464 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company’s Board of Directors approved a quarterly dividend on November 12, 2014 of $.05 per share payable in cash on December 12, 2014 to stockholders of record as of November 28, 2014 (see Note 13).

Stock Options

Pursuant to the Company’s 2005 Equity Participation Plan (the “2005 Plan”), which provides for the issuance of incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options and restricted stock, a maximum of 700,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock are permitted to be issued pursuant to options granted and restricted stock issued. Effective August 12, 2014, the Company adopted the 2014 Equity Participation Plan (the “2014 Plan”) pursuant to which, subject to shareholder approval on or before August 12, 2015 a maximum of 700,000 shares of common stock of the Company are authorized to be issued pursuant to the grant of incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and stock bonuses. Incentive stock options granted under the 2014 Plan and 2005 Plan expire no later than ten years from the date of grant (except no later than five years for a grant to a 10% stockholder). The Board of Directors or the Stock Option Committee determines the expiration date with respect to non-statutory stock options and the vesting provisions for restricted stock granted under the 2014 Plan and 2005 Plan.

The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 include stock-based compensation expense totaling approximately $119,000 and $40,000, respectively. The results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 include stock-based compensation expense totaling approximately $92,000 and $27,000, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options is net of estimated forfeitures of 20% for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2014 and 21% for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2013. Such amounts have been included in the condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income within other operating expenses.

Stock-based compensation expense in 2014 and 2013 is the grant date estimated fair value of options amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire portion of the award. The weighted average estimated fair value of stock options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $1.60 per share and $1.38 per share, respectively. The fair value of stock options at the grant date was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The following weighted average assumptions were used for grants during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:

	2014			2013
Dividend Yield		2.97	%		3.14	%
Volatility		46.53	%		46.71	%
Risk-Free Interest Rate		.92	%		.79	%
Expected Life	3.25 years			3.25 years

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because our stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our stock options.

A summary of option activity under the Company’s 2005 Plan for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 is as follows:

Stock Options	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value

Outstanding at January 1, 2014		321,365		$	3.36		2.26	$	1,257,936

Granted (1)		200,000		$	6.73		-	$	272,000
Exercised		(70,115	)	$	2.48		-	$	296,992
Forfeited		-		$	-		-	$	-

Outstanding at September 30, 2014 (1)		451,250		$	4.99		3.19	$	1,400,438

Vested and Exercisable at September 30, 2014		241,250		$	3.83		1.95	$	1,026,900

(1)	On August 12, 2014, an additional 50,000 options were granted under the 2014 Plan, which is subject to shareholder approval.

The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options exercisable at September 30, 2014 is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying options and the market price of the Company’s Common Stock for the options that had exercise prices that were lower than the $8.09 closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on September 30, 2014.

Participants in the 2014 Plan and 2005 Plan may exercise their outstanding vested options, in whole or in part, by having the Company reduce the number of shares otherwise issuable by a number of shares having a fair market value equal to the exercise price of the option being exercised (“Net Exercise”). A total of 70,115 options and 1,250 options were exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

As of September 30, 2014, the fair value of unamortized compensation cost related to unvested stock option awards was approximately $212,000. Unamortized compensation cost as of September 30, 2014 is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average vesting period of 1.48 years.

Note 9 – Income Taxes

Income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were computed using the effective tax rate estimated to be applicable for the full year, which is subject to ongoing review and evaluation by management. The Company files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return that includes all wholly owned subsidiaries. State tax returns are filed on a consolidated or separate basis depending on applicable laws. The Company records adjustments related to prior years’ taxes during the period when they are identified, generally when the tax returns are filed. The effect of these adjustments on the current and prior periods (during which the differences originated) is evaluated based upon quantitative and qualitative factors and are considered in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole for the respective periods. The Company has evaluated this year’s amounts in relation to the current and prior reporting periods and determined that a restatement of those prior reporting periods is not appropriate. The Company’s effective tax rate from operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was 32.1% and 28.6%, respectively.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined using the enacted tax rates applicable to the period the temporary differences are expected to be recovered. Accordingly, the current period income tax provision can be affected by the enactment of new tax rates. The net deferred income taxes on the balance sheet reflect temporary differences between the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and income tax purposes, tax effected at a various rates depending on whether the temporary differences are subject to federal taxes, state taxes, or both. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

	September 30,			December 31,
	2014			2013

Deferred tax asset:
Net operating loss carryovers (1)	$	238,862		$	246,476
Claims reserve discount		505,447			445,384
Unearned premium		1,747,757			1,000,372
Deferred ceding commission revenue		1,934,251			2,374,616
Other		-			17,087
Total deferred tax assets		4,426,317			4,083,935

Deferred tax liability:
Investment in KICO (2)		1,169,000			1,169,000
Deferred acquisition costs		2,938,996			2,332,489
Intangibles		799,836			921,143
Depreciation and amortization		156,493			197,223
Net unrealized appreciation of securities - available for sale		460,175			157,167
Other		5,309			-
Total deferred tax liabilities		5,529,809			4,777,022

Net deferred income tax liability	$	(1,103,492	)	$	(693,087	)

_______________________

(1)	The deferred tax assets from net operating loss carryovers (“NOL”) are as follows:

	September 30,			December 31,
Type of NOL	2014			2013			Expiration
State only (A)	$	537,300		$	459,989		December 31, 2034
Valuation allowance		(315,438	)		(240,713	)
State only, net of valuation allowance		221,862			219,276
Amount subject to Annual Limitation, federal only (B)		17,000			27,200		December 31, 2019
Total deferred tax asset from net operating loss carryovers	$	238,862		$	246,476

(A) Kingstone generates operating losses for state purposes and has prior year NOLs available. The state NOL as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was approximately $6,473,000 and $5,416,000, respectively. KICO, the Company’s insurance underwriting subsidiary, is not subject to state income taxes. KICO’s state tax obligations are paid through a gross premiums tax, which is included in the condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income within other underwriting expenses. A valuation allowance has been recorded due to the uncertainty of generating enough state taxable income to utilize 100% of the available state NOLs over their remaining lives, which expire between 2027 and 2034.

(B) The Company has an NOL of $50,000 that is subject to Internal Revenue Code Section 382, which places a limitation on the utilization of the federal NOL loss to approximately $10,000 per year (“Annual Limitation”) as a result of a greater than 50% ownership change of the Company in 1999. The losses subject to the Annual Limitation will be available for future years, expiring through December 31, 2019.

(2)	Deferred tax liability - investment in KICO

On July 1, 2009, the Company completed the acquisition of 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of KICO (formerly known as Commercial Mutual Insurance Company (“CMIC”)) pursuant to the conversion of CMIC from an advance premium cooperative to a stock property and casualty insurance company. Pursuant to the plan of conversion, the Company acquired a 100% equity interest in KICO, in consideration for the exchange of $3,750,000 principal amount of surplus notes of CMIC. In addition, the Company forgave all accrued and unpaid interest on the surplus notes as of the date of conversion. As of the date of acquisition, unpaid accrued interest on the surplus notes along with the accretion of the discount on the original purchase of the surplus notes totaled $2,921,319 (together “Untaxed Interest”). As of the date of acquisition, the deferred tax liability on the Untaxed Interest was $1,169,000. Under GAAP guidance for business combinations, a temporary difference with an indefinite life exists when the parent has a lower carrying value of its subsidiary for income tax purposes. The Company is required to maintain its deferred tax liability of $1,169,000 related to this temporary difference until the stock of KICO is sold, or the assets of KICO are sold or KICO and the parent are merged.

In assessing the valuation of deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. No valuation allowance against deferred tax assets has been established, except for NOL limitations, as the Company believes it is more likely than not the deferred tax assets will be realized based on the historical taxable income of KICO, or by offset to deferred tax liabilities.

The Company had no material unrecognized tax benefit and no adjustments to liabilities or operations were required. There were no interest or penalties related to income taxes that have been accrued or recognized as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. If any had been recognized these would be reported in income tax expense.

IRS Tax Audit

Generally, federal, state and local authorities may examine the Company’s tax returns for three years from the date of filing.

In March 2014, the Company received a notice that its federal income tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 were selected for examination by the Internal Revenue Service. On March 31, 2014, the Company was notified that the examination was cancelled.

Note 10 - Net Income Per Common Share

Basic net earnings per common share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share reflect, in periods in which they have a dilutive effect, the impact of common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options. The computation of diluted earnings common per share excludes those options with an exercise price in excess of the average market price of the Company’s common shares during the periods presented.

The computation of diluted earnings per common share excludes outstanding options in periods where the exercise of such options would be anti-dilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the inclusion of 32,473 and 16,120 options, respectively, in the computation of diluted earnings per common share would have been anti-dilutive for the periods and, as a result, the weighted average number of common shares used in the calculation of diluted earnings per common share has not been adjusted for the effect of such options. For the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the inclusion of 86,522 and 16,120 options, respectively, in the computation of diluted earnings per common share would have been anti-dilutive for the periods and, as a result, the weighted average number of common shares used in the calculation of diluted earnings per common share has not been adjusted for the effect of such options.

The reconciliation of the weighted average number of common shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common share follows:

	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013

Weighted average number of shares outstanding		7,294,913		3,811,243		7,283,244		3,826,510
Effect of dilutive securities, common share equivalents		83,184		76,597		77,050		76,917

Weighted average number of shares outstanding,
used for computing diluted earnings per share		7,378,097		3,887,840		7,360,294		3,903,427

Note 11 - Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

From time to time, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. For example, to the extent a claim asserted by a third party in a law suit against one of the Company’s insureds covered by a particular policy, the Company may have a duty to defend the insured party against the claim. These claims may relate to bodily injury, property damage or other compensable injuries as set forth in the policy. Such proceedings are considered in estimating the liability for loss and LAE expenses. The Company is not subject to any other pending legal proceedings that management believes are likely to have a material adverse effect on the financial statements.

State Insurance Regulation

In the aftermath of Superstorm Sandy, the New York State Department of Financial Services (“DFS”) has adopted various regulations that affect insurance companies that operate in the state of New York. Included among the regulations are accelerated claims investigation and settlement requirements and mandatory participation in non-binding mediation proceedings funded by the insurer. Further, in February 2013, the state of New York announced that the DFS commenced an investigation into the claims practices of three insurance companies, including KICO, in connection with Superstorm Sandy claims. The DFS stated that the three insurers had a much larger than average consumer complaint rate with regard to Superstorm Sandy claims and indicated that the three insurers were being investigated for (i) failure to send adjusters in a timely manner; (ii) failure to process claims in a timely manner; and (iii) inability of homeowners to contact insurance company representatives. KICO received a letter from the DFS seeking information and data with regard to the foregoing. KICO has supplied information and data, and is cooperating with the DFS in connection with its investigation. KICO has not received a response from the DFS and believes that such matter will not have any effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Employment Agreement

Effective August 12, 2014, the Company entered into an amendment to its employment agreement with Barry Goldstein, its President, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to which the term of the employment agreement was extended from December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2016 and, effective July 1, 2014 and continuing through the term of the agreement, Mr. Goldstein’s annual base salary was increased to $575,000 and his bonus was revised to equal 6% of the Company’s consolidated income from operations before taxes, net of the Company’s consolidated net investment income and net realized gains on sales of investments. In addition, in consideration of Mr. Goldstein entering into the amendment, the Company paid him a bonus in the amount of $62,500.

Concurrently with the amendment, the Company granted to Mr. Goldstein, pursuant to the 2005 Plan, a five year option for the purchase of 200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.73 per share, exercisable to the extent of 62,500 shares on the date of grant and each of the initial two anniversary dates of the grant and 12,500 shares on the third anniversary date of the grant. In addition, the Company granted to Mr. Goldstein, pursuant to the 2014 Plan, a five year option for the purchase of 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.73 per share, exercisable on the third anniversary of the date of the grant. The 50,000 share option grant is subject to shareholder approval of the 2014 Plan. Pursuant to the stock option agreements with Mr. Goldstein, the Company agreed that, under certain circumstances following a change of control of the Company, and the termination of his employment, or in the event Mr. Goldstein’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company without cause or he resigns with good reason (each as defined in his employment agreement), all of the options granted to Mr. Goldstein would become exercisable and would remain exercisable until the first anniversary of the termination date.

Note 12 – Premium Finance Placement Fees

The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Payments Inc. (“Payments”), is licensed as a premium finance agency in the state of New York. Prior to February 1, 2008, Payments provided premium financing in connection with the obtaining of insurance policies. Effective February 1, 2008, Payments sold its outstanding premium finance loan portfolio. The purchaser of the portfolio (the “Purchaser”) has agreed that, during the five year period ended February 1, 2013 (which period has been extended to February 1, 2015), it will purchase, assume and service all eligible premium finance contracts originated by Payments in the state of New York (the “Agreement”). In connection with such purchases, Payments will be entitled to receive a fee generally equal to a percentage of the amount financed.

On July 17, 2014, the Purchaser terminated the Agreement effective February 1, 2015. Following any expiration or termination of the obligation of the Purchaser to purchase premium finance contracts, Payments will be entitled to receive the fees for an additional two years with regard to contracts for policies from the Company’s producers. The Company’s premium financing business currently consists of the placement fees that Payments earns from placing contracts. Placement fee revenue included in other income and the related direct expenses included in other operating expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of net income and comprehensive income are as follows (unaudited):

	For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013

Placement fee revenue	$	51,810	$	65,586	$	180,970	$	241,178
Direct expenses		13,966		15,884		43,002		50,267
Net income before taxes from placement fees	$	37,844	$	49,702	$	137,968	$	190,911

Note 13 – Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated events that occurred subsequent to September 30, 2014 through the date these financial statements were issued for matters that required disclosure or adjustment in these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Dividends Declared and Paid

On November 12, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a dividend of $.05 per share payable in cash on December 12, 2014 to stockholders of record as of November 28, 2014.

Commercial Auto Line of Business

Effective October 1, 2014 the Company decided that it will no longer accept new commercial auto policies. The action was taken following a series of underwriting and pricing measures which were intended to improve the profitability of this line of business. The actions taken did not yield the hoped for results. The Company is selectively renewing its existing policies.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Overview

We offer property and casualty insurance products to small businesses and individuals in New York State through our subsidiary, Kingstone Insurance Company (“KICO”). KICO’s insureds are located primarily in downstate New York, consisting of New York City, Long Island and Westchester County.

We derive 99% of our revenue from KICO, which includes revenues from earned premiums, ceding commissions from quota share reinsurance, net investment income generated from its portfolio, and net realized gains and losses on investment securities. All of KICO’s insurance policies are for a one year period. Earned premiums represent premiums received from insureds, which are recognized as revenue over the period of time that insurance coverage is provided (i.e., ratably over the one year life of the policy). A significant period of time normally elapses between the receipt of insurance premiums and the payment of insurance claims. During this time, KICO invests the premiums, earns investment income and generates net realized and unrealized investment gains and losses on investments.

Our expenses include the insurance underwriting expenses of KICO and other operating expenses. Insurance companies incur a significant amount of their total expenses from losses incurred by policyholders, which are commonly referred to as claims. In settling these claims for losses, various loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) are incurred such as insurance adjusters’ fees and litigation expenses. In addition, insurance companies incur policy acquisition costs. Policy acquisition costs include commissions paid to producers, premium taxes, and other expenses related to the underwriting process, including employees’ compensation and benefits.

Other operating expenses include our corporate expenses as a holding company. These expenses include legal and auditing fees, occupancy costs related to our former corporate office, which was closed in May 2013, executive employment costs, and other costs directly associated with being a public company.

Product Lines

Our product lines include the following:

Personal lines. Our largest line of business is personal lines, consisting of homeowners, dwelling fire, 3-4 family dwelling package, condominium, renters, mechanical breakdown, service line and personal umbrella policies.

Commercial liability. We offer business owners policies, which consist primarily of small business retail risks without a residential exposure. We also write artisan’s liability policies and special multi-peril property and liability policies.

Commercial automobile. We provide physical damage and liability coverage for light vehicles owned by small contractors and artisans.

Livery physical damage and other. We write for-hire vehicle physical damage only policies for livery and car service vehicles and taxicabs as well as canine legal liability policies.

Key Measures

We utilize the following key measures in analyzing the results of our insurance underwriting business:

Net loss ratio. The net loss ratio is a measure of the underwriting profitability of an insurance company’s business. Expressed as a percentage, this is the ratio of net losses and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) incurred to net premiums earned.

Net underwriting expense ratio. The net underwriting expense ratio is a measure of an insurance company’s operational efficiency in administering its business. Expressed as a percentage, this is the ratio of the sum of acquisition costs (the most significant being commissions paid to our producers) and other underwriting expenses less ceding commission revenue less other income to net premiums earned.

Net combined ratio. The net combined ratio is a measure of an insurance company’s overall underwriting profit. This is the sum of the net loss and net underwriting expense ratios. If the net combined ratio is at or above 100 percent, an insurance company cannot be profitable without investment income, and may not be profitable if investment income is insufficient.

Underwriting income. Underwriting income is net pre-tax income attributable to our insurance underwriting business except for net investment income, net realized gains from investments, and depreciation and amortization (net premiums earned less expenses included in combined ratio). Underwriting income is a measure of an insurance company’s overall operating profitability before items such as investment income, depreciation and amortization, interest expense and income taxes.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Kingstone Companies, Inc. and all majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires our management to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and related notes. In preparing these financial statements, our management has utilized information available including our past history, industry standards and the current economic environment, among other factors, in forming its estimates and judgments of certain amounts included in the consolidated financial statements, giving due consideration to materiality. It is possible that the ultimate outcome as anticipated by our management in formulating its estimates inherent in these financial statements might not materialize. However, application of the critical accounting policies involves the exercise of judgment and use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. In addition, other companies may utilize different estimates, which may affect the comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.

We believe that the most critical accounting policies relate to the reporting of reserves for loss and LAE, including losses that have occurred but have not been reported prior to the reporting date, amounts recoverable from third party reinsurers, deferred ceding commission revenue, deferred policy acquisition costs, deferred income taxes, the impairment of investment securities, intangible assets and the valuation of stock-based compensation. See Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements - “Accounting Policies” for information related to updated accounting policies.

Consolidated Results of Operations

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013

The following table summarizes the changes in the results of our operations (in thousands) for the periods indicated:

	Nine months ended September 30,
($ in thousands)	2014			2013			Change			Percent
Revenues
Direct written premiums	$	56,729		$	44,652		$	12,077			27.0	%
Assumed written premiums		39			37			2			5.4	%
		56,768			44,689			12,079			27.0	%
Ceded written premiums
Ceded to quota share treaties in force during the period		28,046			25,204			2,842			11.3	%
Return of premiums previously ceded to prior quota share treaties		(6,597	)		(764	)		(5,833	)		763.6	%
Ceded to quota share treaties		21,449			24,440			(2,991	)		(12.2	) %
Ceded to excess of loss treaties		765			562			203			36.1	%
Ceded to catastrophe treaties		1,740			1,101			639			58.0	%
Catastrophe reinstatement (1)		60			465			(405	)		(87.1	) %
Total ceded written premiums		24,014			26,568			(2,554	)		(9.6	) %

Net written premiums		32,754			18,121			14,633			80.8	%
Change in net unearned premiums		(10,503	)		(2,696	)		(7,807	)		289.6	%
Net premiums earned		22,251			15,425			6,826			44.3	%

Ceding commission revenue
Excluding the effect of catastrophes		10,883			10,086			797			7.9	%
Effect of catastrophes (1)		(517	)		(1,847	)		1,330			(72.0	) %
Total ceding commission revenue		10,366			8,239			2,127			25.8	%
Net investment income		1,294			853			441			51.7	%
Net realized gain on investments		437			449			(12	)		(2.7	) %
Other income		742			671			71			10.6	%
Total revenues		35,090			25,637			9,453			36.9	%

Expenses
Loss and loss adjustment expenses
Direct and assumed:
Loss and loss adjustment expenses excluding the effect of catastrophes		19,988			20,096			(108	)		(0.5	) %
Losses from catastrophes (1)		3,764			225			3,539			1,572.9	%
Total direct and assumed loss and loss adjustment expenses		23,752			20,321			3,431			16.9	%

Ceded loss and loss adjustment expenses:
Loss and loss adjustment expenses excluding the effect of catastrophes		9,058			11,981			(2,923	)		(24.4	) %
Losses from catastrophes (1)		2,823			189			2,634			1,393.7	%
Total ceded loss and loss adjustment expenses		11,881			12,170			(289	)		(2.4	) %

Net loss and loss adjustment expenses:
Loss and loss adjustment expenses excluding the effect of catastrophes		10,930			8,115			2,815			34.7	%
Losses from catastrophes (1)		941			36			905			2,513.9	%
Net loss and loss adjustment expenses		11,871			8,151			3,720			45.6	%

Commission expense		8,592			6,758			1,834			27.1	%
Other underwriting expenses		7,657			6,757			900			13.3	%
Other operating expenses		1,074			750			324			43.2	%
Depreciation and amortization		642			472			170			36.0	%
Interest expense		-			58			(58	)		(100.0	) %
Total expenses		29,836			22,946			6,890			30.0	%

Income from operations before taxes		5,254			2,691			2,563			95.2	%
Provision for income tax		1,689			770			919			119.4	%
Net income	$	3,565		$	1,921		$	1,644			85.6	%

(1) For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, includes the effects of severe winter weather (which we define as a catastrophe), which occurred in January and February 2014. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, includes the effects of Superstorm Sandy (which we define as a catastrophe), which occurred on October 29, 2012. We define a “catastrophe” as an event or series of related events that involve multiple first party policyholders, or an event or series of events that produce a number of claims in excess of a preset, per-event threshold of average claims in a specific area, occurring within a certain amount of time constituting the event or series of events. Catastrophes are caused by various natural events including high winds, excessive rain, winter storms, severe winter weather, tornadoes, hailstorms, wildfires, tropical storms, and hurricanes.

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2014			2013			Point Change			Percent Change
Key ratios:
Net loss ratio		53.4	%		52.8	%		0.6	%		1.1	%
Net underwriting expense ratio		24.0	%		31.5	%		-7.5	%		(23.8	) %
Net combined ratio		77.4	%		84.3	%		-6.9	%		(8.2	) %

Direct written premiums during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 (“2014”) were $56,729,000 compared to $44,652,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (“2013”). The increase of $12,077,000 or 27.0%, was primarily due to an increase in policies in-force during 2014 as compared to 2013. We wrote more new policies as a result of continued demand for our products in the markets that we serve. Policies in-force increased by 23.5% as of September 30, 2014 compared to September 30, 2013. In addition to the increase of policies in-force, the average premium per policy is increasing. This increase in direct written premiums in 2014 over 2013 was also affected by New York State regulations enacted to protect victims of Superstorm Sandy, which prohibited us from cancelling policies or non-renewing existing policies beginning in the fourth quarter of 2012 and extending through various dates during the quarter ended March 31, 2013 (the “Moratorium Period”). After the expiration of the Moratorium Period in 2013, the additional cancellations and non-renewal of existing policies reduced our direct written premiums in 2013.

The following table describes the quota share reinsurance rates in effect during 2014 and 2013. For purposes of the discussion herein, the change in quota share rates on July 1 of each year will be referred to as “the Cut-off”. This table should be referred to in conjunction with the discussions for net written premiums, net premiums earned and net loss and loss adjustment expenses that follow.

Nine months ended September 30, 2014

Nine months ended September 30, 2013

January 1,

July 1,

January 1,

July 1,

June 30,

September 30,

June 30,

September 30,

("2013/2014 Treaties")

("2014/2015 Treaty")

("2012/2013 Treaties")

("2013/2014 Treaties")

Quota share

Personal lines

Commercial lines

none

Net written premiums increased $14,633,000, or 80.8%, to $32,754,000 in 2014 from $18,121,000 in 2013. Net written premiums include direct and assumed premiums, less the amount of written premiums ceded under our reinsurance treaties (quota share, excess of loss and catastrophe). Our personal lines of business is subject to a quota share treaty and our commercial lines of business was subject to a quota share treaty through June 30, 2014. A reduction to the quota share percentage or elimination of a quota share treaty will reduce our ceded written premiums, which will result in a corresponding increase to our net written premiums. Effective July 1, 2014, we terminated our commercial lines quota share treaty. The previous commercial lines quota share treaty effective July 1, 2013 had a quota share percentage of 25%. Also, effective July 1, 2014, we decreased the quota share percentage in our personal lines quota share treaty from 75% to 55%. The Cut-off of these treaties on July 1, 2014 results in the return of premiums from our reinsurers that were previously ceded under the expiring quota share treaties. In 2014 and 2013, our ceded catastrophe premiums include an additional $60,000 and $465,000, respectively, of reinstatement premiums for catastrophe coverage as a result of Superstorm Sandy.

Most of the premiums written under our personal lines are also subject to our catastrophe treaty. An increase in our personal lines business gives rise to more property exposure, which increases our exposure to catastrophe risk; therefore, our premiums for catastrophe insurance will increase. This results in an increase in premiums ceded under our catastrophe treaty, which reduces net written premiums. An increase in written premiums will also increase the premiums ceded under our excess of loss treaties, which also reduce our net written premiums.

Net premiums earned increased $6,826,000, or 44.3%, to $22,251,000 in 2014 from $15,425,000 in 2013. The increase was primarily due to us retaining more earned premiums as result of the reduction of the quota share percentage in our personal lines quota share treaty and elimination of the commercial lines treaty on July 1, 2014. The decreases in our quota share percentages from the July 1, 2014 Cut-offs gave us a return of premiums previously ceded, which increased our net premiums earned during the period. In addition, as premiums written earn ratably over a twelve month period, net premiums earned in 2014 will increase from the higher net written premiums for the twelve months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the twelve months ended September 30, 2013. The increase in net premiums earned was also due to a $405,000 decrease in reinstatement premiums paid in 2014 compared to 2013 for catastrophe coverage as a result of Superstorm Sandy.

The following table describes the quota share provisional ceding commission rates in effect during 2014 and 2013. This table should be referred to in conjunction with the discussion for ceding commission revenue that follows.

Nine months ended September 30, 2014

Nine months ended September 30, 2013

January 1,

July 1,

January 1,

July 1,

June 30,

September 30,

June 30,

September 30,

("2013/2014 Treaties")

("2014/2015 Treaty")

("2012/2013 Treaties")

("2013/2014 Treaties")

Quota share

Personal lines

Commercial lines

none

The following table summarizes the changes in the components of ceding commission revenue (in thousands) for the periods indicated:

	Nine months ended September 30,
($ in thousands)	2014			2013			Change			Percent

Provisional ceding commissions earned	$	9,661		$	7,836		$	1,825			23.3	%

Contingent ceding commissions earned
Contingent ceding commissions earned excluding
the effect of catastrophes		1,222			2,250			(1,028	)		(45.7	) %
Effect of catastrophes on ceding commisions earned		(517	)		(1,847	)		1,330			(72.0	) %
Contingent ceding commissions earned		705			403			302			74.9	%

Total ceding commission revenue	$	10,366		$	8,239		$	2,127			25.8	%

Ceding commission revenue was $10,366,000 in 2014 compared to $8,239,000 in 2013. The increase of $2,127,000, or 25.8%, was due to an increase in both provisional ceding commissions earned and contingent ceding commissions earned. We receive a provisional ceding commission based on ceded written premiums and a contingent ceding commission based on a sliding scale in relation to the losses incurred under our quota share treaties. The lower the loss ratio, the more contingent commission we receive. The amount of contingent commissions we are eligible to receive is reduced by the amount of provisional commissions previously received. Effective July 1, 2013, our provisional ceding commission rate on our personal lines treaty increased to 40% from 35%, which reduced the amount of contingent ceding commissions we can ultimately receive. The amount of contingent commissions we are eligible to receive under our current personal lines quota share treaty, effective July 1, 2014, is subject to change based on losses incurred from claims incurred beginning July 1, 2014. The amount of contingent commissions we are eligible to receive under our prior years’ quota share treaties is subject to change based on losses incurred before July 1, 2014 under those treaties. We did not renew our commercial lines quota share treaty upon its expiration on June 30, 2014.

The $1,825,000 increase in provisional ceding commissions earned is due to: (1) an increase in the amount of ceded premiums written and earned in our personal lines and (2) an increase in our personal lines provisional ceding commission rate to 40% from 35% effective July 1, 2013, which affects all of 2014 but only part of the nine-month period of 2013. The increase in provisional ceding commissions earned was partially offset by a decrease in the amount of premiums ceded as a result of the July 1, 2014 Cut-offs. Under the July 1, 2014 Cut-offs, our quota share percentages were reduced in our personal lines from 75% to 55% and in our commercial lines from 25% to 0%. Under the July 1, 2013 Cut-off, our quota share percentage in our commercial lines was reduced from 40% to 25%.

The term of our personal lines reinsurance quota share treaty covers the period from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2015 (“2013/2015 Treaty”). The treaty provides for contingent ceding commissions based on a sliding scale whereby we are entitled to receive between 40% - 57% of the ceded earned premiums; the lower the ceded loss ratio, the higher the percentage we were entitled to receive. In 2014, the computation to arrive at contingent ceding commission revenue under the 2013/2015 Treaty includes catastrophe losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred from severe winter weather during January and February 2014 (see discussion of net loss and loss adjustment expenses below). Such losses increased our ceded loss ratio in our 2013/2015 Treaty, which reduced our contingent ceding commission revenue in accordance with the sliding scale discussed above in 2014 by $517,000. See “Reinsurance” below for changes to our personal lines quota share treaty effective July 1, 2014.

The term of our previous personal lines reinsurance quota share treaty covered the period from July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013 (“2012/2013 Treaty”). The treaty provided for contingent ceding commissions based on a sliding scale whereby we were entitled to receive between 31% - 52% of the ceded earned premiums; the lower the ceded loss ratio, the higher the percentage we were entitled to receive. In 2013, the computation to arrive at contingent ceding commission revenue under the 2012/2013 Treaty includes direct catastrophe losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred from Superstorm Sandy on October 29, 2012. Such losses increased our ceded loss ratio in our 2012/2013 Treaty, which reduced our contingent ceding commission revenue in accordance with the sliding scale discussed above in 2013 by $1,847,000.

The $302,000 increase in contingent ceding commissions earned, after the impact of catastrophes, is due to a decrease in catastrophe losses and LAE incurred under our quota share reinsurance treaties in 2014 as compared to 2013 and an increase in ceded premiums earned under our personal lines quota share treaty due to growth in direct written premiums subject to that treaty. The increases in contingent ceding commissions earned were partially offset by: (1) the increase in our personal lines provisional ceding commission rate to 40% from 35% effective July 1, 2013, with the greater provisional ceding commission rate resulting in reduced ceded premiums applicable to contingent commissions that we can ultimately receive, (2) the decrease in our personal lines quota share percentage to 55% from 75% effective July 1, 2014, the decrease in our commercial lines quota share percentage to 0% from 25% effective July 1, 2014, and the decrease in our commercial lines quota share percentage to 25% from 40% effective July 1, 2013, with lower quota share percentages resulting in less contingent commissions that we can ultimately receive, and (3) an increase in losses incurred under our previous commercial lines quota share treaties from claims in the prior treaty years, which increased our ceded loss ratio, resulting in a reduction to contingent ceding commissions previously earned.

Net investment income was $1,294,000 in 2014 compared to $853,000 in 2013. The increase of $441,000, or 51.7%, was due to an increase in average invested assets in 2014. The increase in cash and invested assets resulted primarily from the net proceeds of $18,804,000 that we received on December 13, 2013 from our public offering and increased operating cash flows. The tax equivalent investment yield, excluding cash, was 4.69% and 5.40% at September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Net loss and loss adjustment expenses were $11,871,000 in 2014 compared to $8,151,000 in 2013. The net loss ratio was 53.4% in 2014 compared to 52.8% in 2013, an increase of 0.6 percentage points. The increase of 0.6 percentage points in our net loss ratio for 2014 as compared to 2013 is due to several offsetting factors that affected our net loss ratio. We incurred net catastrophe losses of $941,000 in our personal lines of business related to severe winter weather, which occurred in January and February 2014. Such losses, which increased our net loss ratio by 4.3 percentage points, were determined by the number of claims in excess of our threshold of average claims from severe winter weather. These claims were primarily from losses due to frozen pipes, weight of snow and ice, and other water related structural damage as a result of excess snow and below normal temperatures for an extended period of time. Despite the catastrophe losses in 2014 discussed above, the net loss ratio in our personal lines of business decreased due to lack of severe weather beyond the first quarter of 2014. The decreases in our quota share rates from the July 1, 2014 Cut-offs gave us a return of premiums previously ceded, which gave rise to an increase in net premiums earned during the period as those premiums are earned. The personal lines Cut-off allows us to retain more of the underwriting results for that line of business. This had a favorable effect on the overall loss ratio since the net earned premium distribution by line has shifted more towards the personal lines of business, which after the Cut-off on July 1, 2014, carried a lower loss ratio than it did after July 1, 2013. Other increases in our net loss ratio are a result of an increase in losses for our longer-tailed commercial auto and commercial lines of business. In 2014 we incurred adverse loss development from prior accident years in our commercial auto line of business that impacted our net loss ratio for the period. See table below under “Additional Financial Information” summarizing net loss ratios by line of business.

Commission expense was $8,592,000 in 2014 or 17.4% of direct earned premiums. Commission expense was $6,758,000 in 2013 or 17.2% of direct earned premiums. The increase of $1,834,000 is due to the increase in direct written premiums in 2014 as compared to 2013.

Other underwriting expenses were $7,657,000 in 2014 compared to $6,757,000 in 2013. The increase of $900,000, or 13.3%, in other underwriting expenses was primarily due to: (1) expenses directly related to the increase in direct written premiums, and (2) additional salaries along with related other employment costs due to the hiring of additional staff needed to service our growth in written premiums and rate increases in annual salaries, offset by a decrease in the reserve for bad debts. The reserve for bad debts was higher in 2013 due to the delayed collection of premiums as a result of DFS regulation regarding Superstorm Sandy. Other underwriting expenses as a percentage of direct written premiums decreased to 13.5% in 2014 from 15.1% in 2013. Other underwriting expenses as a percentage of net premiums earned decreased to 34.4%% in 2014 from 43.8% in 2013.

Our net underwriting expense ratio in 2014 was 24.0% compared with 31.5% in 2013. The decrease of 7.5 percentage points, or 23.8%, is due to: (1) the increase in net premiums earned as a result of the changes to our quota share treaties on July 1, 2014 and (2) a decrease in the effect that catastrophes had on contingent ceding commission revenue.

Other operating expenses, related to the expenses of our holding company, were $1,074,000 in 2014 compared to $750,000 in 2013. The increase in 2014 of $324,000, or 43.2%, was primarily due to higher accrued executive bonuses in 2014 compared to 2013, a bonus paid along with options granted to our chief executive officer in 2014 pursuant to his amended employment agreement, partially offset by a decrease in professional fees.

Interest expense was $-0- in 2014 compared to $58,000 in 2013. The $58,000 decrease in interest expense, or 100%, was due to the $747,000 redemption of outstanding notes and $210,000 repayment of the outstanding balance on our credit line from the proceeds of our public offering in December 2013.

Depreciation and amortization was $642,000 in 2014 compared to $472,000 in 2013. The increase of $170,000, or 36.0%, in depreciation and amortization was primarily due to depreciation on newly purchased assets used to upgrade our systems infrastructure.

Income tax expense in 2014 was $1,689,000, which resulted in an effective tax rate of 32.1%. Income tax expense in 2013 was $770,000, which resulted in an effective tax rate of 28.6%. Income before taxes was $5,254,000 in 2014 compared to $2,691,000 in 2013. The increase in the effective tax rate by 3.5 percentage points in 2014 is a result of the amount and the effect of permanent differences having a lesser effect in 2014 compared to 2013 due to the greater income before taxes in 2014.

Net income was $3,565,000 in 2014 compared to $1,921,000 in 2013. The increase in net income of $1,644,000, or 85.6%, was due to the circumstances described above that caused the increase in our net premiums earned, provisional ceding commissions, and net investment income, partially offset by an increase in commission expense, other underwriting expenses related to premium growth and other operating expenses.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2013

The following table summarizes the changes in the results of our operations (in thousands) for the periods indicated:

	Three months ended September 30,
($ in thousands)	2014			2013			Change			Percent
Revenues
Direct written premiums	$	20,131		$	15,926		$	4,205			26.4	%
Assumed written premiums		23			17			6			35.3	%
		20,154			15,943			4,211			26.4	%
Ceded written premiums
Ceded to quota share treaties in force during the period		8,049			9,341			(1,292	)		(13.8	) %
Return of premiums previously ceded to prior quota share treaties		(6,597	)		(764	)		(5,833	)		763.6	%
Ceded to quota share treaties		1,452			8,577			(7,125	)		(83.1	) %
Ceded to excess of loss treaties		341			(35	)		376		na
Ceded to catastrophe treaties		693			105			588			560.0	%
Catastrophe reinstatement (1)		-			140			(140	)		(100.0	) %
Total ceded written premiums		2,486			8,787			(6,301	)		(71.7	) %

Net written premiums		17,668			7,156			10,512			146.9	%
Change in net unearned premiums		(7,773	)		(1,030	)		(6,743	)		654.7	%
Net premiums earned		9,895			6,126			3,769			61.5	%

Ceding commission revenue
Excluding the effect of catastrophes		3,278			3,612			(334	)		(9.2	) %
Effect of catastrophes (1)		-			-			-		na
Total ceding commission revenue		3,278			3,612			(334	)		(9.2	) %
Net investment income		464			294			170			57.8	%
Net realized gain on investments		115			94			21			22.3	%
Other income		264			213			51			23.9	%
Total revenues		14,016			10,339			3,677			35.6	%

Expenses
Loss and loss adjustment expenses
Direct and assumed:
Loss and loss adjustment expenses excluding the effect of catastrophes		4,765			6,333			(1,568	)		(24.8	) %
Losses from catastrophes (1)		-			-			-		na
Total direct and assumed loss and loss adjustment expenses		4,765			6,333			(1,568	)		(24.8	) %

Ceded loss and loss adjustment expenses:
Loss and loss adjustment expenses excluding the effect of catastrophes		227			3,774			(3,547	)		(94.0	) %
Losses from catastrophes (1)		-			120			(120	)		(100.0	) %
Total ceded loss and loss adjustment expenses		227			3,894			(3,667	)		(94.2	) %

Net loss and loss adjustment expenses:
Loss and loss adjustment expenses excluding the effect of catastrophes		4,538			2,559			1,979			77.3	%
Losses from catastrophes (1)		-			(120	)		120			(100.0	) %
Net loss and loss adjustment expenses		4,538			2,439			2,099			86.1	%

Commission expense		3,106			2,563			543			21.2	%
Other underwriting expenses		2,846			2,612			234			9.0	%
Other operating expenses		486			279			207			74.2	%
Depreciation and amortization		249			166			83			50.0	%
Interest expense		-			19			(19	)		(100.0	) %
Total expenses		11,225			8,078			3,147			39.0	%

Income from operations before taxes		2,791			2,261			530			23.4	%
Provision for income tax		907			599			308			51.4	%
Net income	$	1,884		$	1,662		$	222			13.4	%

(1) For the three months ended September 30, 2013, includes the effects of Superstorm Sandy (which we define as a catastrophe), which occurred on October 29, 2012. We define a “catastrophe” as an event or series of related events that involve multiple first party policyholders, or an event or series of events that produce a number of claims in excess of a preset, per-event threshold of average claims in a specific area, occurring within a certain amount of time constituting the event or series of events. Catastrophes are caused by various natural events including high winds, excessive rain, winter storms, severe winter weather, tornadoes, hailstorms, wildfires, tropical storms, and hurricanes.

	Three months ended September 30,
	2014			2013			Point Change			Percent Change
Key ratios:
Net loss ratio		45.9	%		39.8	%		6.1	%		15.3	%
Net underwriting expense ratio		25.0	%		23.2	%		1.8	%		7.8	%
Net combined ratio		70.9	%		63.0	%		7.9	%		12.5	%

Direct written premiums during the three months ended September 30, 2014 (“Q3 2014”) were $20,131,000 compared to $15,926,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2013 (“Q3 2013”). The increase of $4,205,000, or 26.4%, was primarily due to an increase in policies in-force during Q3 2014 as compared to Q3 2013. We wrote more new policies as a result of continued demand for our products in the markets that we serve. Policies in-force increased by 23.5% as of September 30, 2014 compared to September 30, 2013. In addition to the increase of policies in-force, the average premium per policy is increasing.

The following table describes the quota share reinsurance rates in effect during Q3 2014 and Q3 2013.For purposes of the discussion herein, the change in quota share rates on July 1 of each year will be referred to as “the Cut-off”. This table should be referred to in conjunction with the discussions for net written premiums, net premiums earned and net loss and loss adjustment expenses that follow.

	Three months ended
	September 30,
	2014			2013
	("2014/2015 Treaty")			("2013/2014 Treaties")
Quota share
Personal lines		55	%		75	%
Commercial lines	none				25	%

Net written premiums increased $10,512,000 or 146.9%, to $17,668,000 in Q3 2014 from $7,156,000 in Q3 2013. Net written premiums include direct and assumed premiums, less the amount of written premiums ceded under our reinsurance treaties (quota share, excess of loss and catastrophe). Our personal lines of business is subject to a quota share treaty and our commercial lines of business was subject to a quota share treaty through June 30, 2014. A reduction to the quota share percentage or elimination of a quota share treaty will reduce our ceded written premiums, which will result in a corresponding increase to our net written premiums. Effective July 1, 2014, we terminated our commercial lines quota share treaty. The previous commercial lines (excluding commercial auto) quota share treaty effective July 1, 2013 had a quota share percentage of 25%. Also, effective July 1, 2014, we decreased the quota share percentage in our personal lines quota share treaty from 75% to 55%. The Cut-off of these treaties on July 1, 2014 results in the return of premiums from our reinsurers that were previously ceded under the expiring quota share treaties. In Q3 2014 and Q3 2013, our ceded catastrophe premiums include an additional $-0- and $140,000, respectively, of reinstatement premiums for catastrophe coverage as a result of Superstorm Sandy.

Net premiums earned increased $3,769,000, or 61.5%, to $9,895,000 in Q3 2014 from $6,126,000 in Q3 2013. The increase was primarily due to us retaining more earned premiums as a result of the reduction of the quota share percentage in our personal lines quota share treaty and elimination of the commercial lines treaty on July 1, 2014. The decreases in our quota share rates from the July 1, 2014 Cut-offs gave us a return of premiums previously ceded, which increased our net premiums earned during the period. In addition, as premiums written earn ratably over a twelve month period, net premiums earned in Q3 2014 will increase from the higher net written premiums for the twelve months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the twelve months ended September 30, 2013.The increase in net premiums earned was also due to a $140,000 decrease in reinstatement premiums paid in Q3 2014 compared to Q3 2013 for catastrophe coverage as a result of Superstorm Sandy.

The following table describes the quota share provisional ceding commission rates in effect during Q3 2014 and Q3 2013. This table should be read in conjunction with the discussion for ceding commission revenue that follows.

	Three months ended
	September 30,
	2014			2013
	("2014/2015 Treaty")			("2013/2014 Treaties")
Quota share
Personal lines		40	%		40	%
Commercial lines	none				36	%

The following table summarizes the changes in the components of ceding commission revenue (in thousands) for the periods indicated:

	Three months ended September 30,
($ in thousands)	2014		2013		Change			Percent

Provisional ceding commissions earned	$	2,653	$	2,941	$	(288	)		(9.8	) %

Contingent ceding commissions earned
Contingent ceding commissions earned excluding
the effect of catastrophes		625		671		(46	)		(6.9	) %
Effect of catastrophes on ceding commisions earned		-		-		-		na
Contingent ceding commissions earned		625		671		(46	)		(6.9	) %

Total ceding commission revenue	$	3,278	$	3,612	$	(334	)		(9.2	) %

Ceding commission revenue was $3,278,000 in Q3 2014 compared to $3,612,000 in Q3 2013. The decrease of $334,000, or 9.2%, was due to a decrease in both provisional ceding commissions earned and contingent ceding commissions earned. We receive a provisional ceding commission based on ceded written premiums and a contingent ceding commission based on a sliding scale in relation to the losses incurred under our quota share treaties. The lower the loss ratio, the more contingent commission we receive. The amount of contingent commissions we are eligible to receive is reduced by the amount of provisional commissions previously received. The amount of contingent commissions we are eligible to receive under our current personal lines quota share treaty, effective July 1, 2014, is subject to change based on losses incurred from claims incurred beginning July 1, 2014. The amount of contingent commissions we are eligible to receive under our prior years’ quota share treaties is subject to change based on losses incurred before July 1, 2014 under those treaties. We did not renew our commercial lines quota share treaty upon its expiration on June 30, 2014.

The $288,000 decrease in provisional ceding commissions earned is due to a decrease in the amount of premiums ceded as a result of a reduction to the quota share percentages effective July 1, 2014 in our personal lines from 75% to 55% and in our commercial lines from 25% to 0%.

The $46,000 decrease in contingent ceding commissions earned is due to the decrease in our personal lines quota share percentage to 55% from 75% effective July 1, 2014 and the decrease in our commercial lines quota share percentage to 0% from 25% effective July 1, 2014, with lower quota share percentages resulting in reduced ceded premium applicable to contingent commissions that we can ultimately receive. This is partially offset by a decrease in losses incurred in Q3 2014 for our previous personal lines quota share treaties from claims in the prior treaty years, which decreased our ceded loss ratio, resulting in an increase to contingent ceding commissions previously earned.

Net investment income was $464,000 in Q3 2014 compared to $294,000 in Q3 2013. The increase of $170,000, or 57.8%, was due to an increase in average invested assets in Q3 2014. The increase in cash and invested assets resulted primarily from the net proceeds of $18,804,000 that we received on December 13, 2013 from our public offering and increased operating cash flows. The tax equivalent investment yield, excluding cash, was 4.69% and 5.40% at September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Net loss and loss adjustment expenses were $4,538,000 in Q3 2014 compared to $2,439,000 in Q3 2013. The net loss ratio was 45.9% in Q3 2014 compared to 39.8% in Q3 2013, an increase of 6.1 percentage points. The increase of 6.1 percentage points in our net loss ratio for Q3 2014 as compared to Q3 2013 is due to several factors that affected our net loss ratio. The increase in our net loss ratio was primarily a result of an increase in losses for our longer-tailed commercial auto and commercial lines of business. In Q3 2014 we incurred adverse loss development from prior accident years in our commercial auto line of business that significantly impacted our net loss ratio for that quarter. See table below under “Additional Financial Information” summarizing net loss ratios by line of business. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in the net loss ratio for our personal lines of business due to lack of severe weather and large claims in Q3 2014. The decreases in our quota share rates from the July 1, 2014 Cut-offs gave us a return of premiums previously ceded, which gave rise to an increase in net premiums earned during the period as those premiums are earned. The personal lines Cut-off allows us to retain more of the underwriting results for that line of business. This had a favorable effect on the overall loss ratio since the net earned premium distribution by line has shifted more towards the personal lines of business, which carried a lower loss ratio for Q3 2014 than it did in Q3 2013.

Commission expense was $3,106,000 in Q3 2014 or 17.6% of direct earned premiums. Commission expense was $2,563,000 in Q3 2013 or 18.4% of direct earned premiums. The increase of $543,000 is due to the increase in direct written premiums in Q3 2014 as compared to Q3 2013.

Other underwriting expenses were $2,846,000 in Q3 2014 compared to $2,612,000 in Q3 2013. The increase of $234,000, or 9.0%, in other underwriting expenses was primarily to: (1) expenses directly related to the increase in direct written premiums, and (2) additional salaries along with related other employment costs due to the hiring of additional staff needed to service our growth in written premiums and rate increases in annual salaries. Other underwriting expenses as a percentage of direct written premiums decreased to 14.1% in Q3 2014 from 16.4% in Q3 2013. Other underwriting expenses as a percentage of net premiums earned decreased to 28.8% in Q3 2014 from 42.6% in Q3 2013.

Our net underwriting expense ratio in Q3 2014 was 25.0% compared with 23.2% in Q3 2013. The increase of 1.8 percentage points, or 7.8%, is due the decrease in ceding commission revenue and its relation to the increase in net premiums earned as a result of the changes to our quota share treaties on July 1, 2014.

Other operating expenses, related to the expenses of our holding company, were $486,000 in Q3 2014 compared to $279,000 in Q3 2013. The increase in, Q3 2014 of $207,000, or 74.2%, was primarily due to higher accrued executive bonuses in Q3 2014 compared to Q3 2013, along with a bonus paid, an increase in salary, and options granted to our chief executive officer in 2014 pursuant to his amended employment agreement.

Interest expense was $-0- in Q3 2014 compared to $19,000 in Q3 2013. The $19,000 decrease in interest expense, or 100%, was due to the $747,000 redemption of outstanding notes and $210,000 repayment of the outstanding balance on our credit line from the proceeds of our public offering in December 2013.

Depreciation and amortization was $249,000 in Q3 2014 compared to $166,000 in Q3 2013. The increase of $83,000, or 50.0%, in depreciation and amortization was primarily due to depreciation on newly purchased assets used to upgrade our systems infrastructure.

Income tax expense in Q3 2014 was $907,000, which resulted in an effective tax rate of 32.5%. Income tax expense in Q3 2013 was $599,000, which resulted in an effective tax rate of 26.5%. Income before taxes was $2,791,000 in Q3 2014 compared to $2,261,000 in Q3 2013. The increase in the effective tax rate by 6.0 percentage points in Q3 2014 is a result of the amount and the effect of permanent differences having a lesser effect in Q3 2014 compared to Q3 2013 due to the greater income before taxes in 2014.

Net income was $1,884,000 in Q3 2014 compared to $1,662,000 in Q3 2013. The increase in net income of $222,000, or 13.4%, was due to the circumstances described above that caused the increase in our net premiums earned and net investment income, partially offset by a decrease in ceding commission revenue, and increases in commission expense, other underwriting expenses related to premium growth and other operating expenses.

Additional Financial Information

We operate our business as one segment, property and casualty insurance. Within this segment, we offer a wide array of property and casualty policies to our producers. The following table summarizes gross and net premiums written, net premiums earned, and loss and loss adjustment expenses by major product type, which were determined based primarily on similar economic characteristics and risks of loss.

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013

Gross premiums written:
Personal lines	$	15,711,055		$	12,018,988		$	41,545,193		$	31,665,543
Commercial lines		2,522,580			2,274,172			8,868,681			7,055,663
Commercial auto		660,352			990,615			2,796,350			4,030,696
Livery physical damage		1,196,027			608,990			3,337,415			1,737,165
Other(1)		64,058			49,800			220,681			199,502
Total	$	20,154,072		$	15,942,565		$	56,768,320		$	44,688,569

Net premiums written:
Personal lines
Excluding the effect of quota share
adjustments on July 1	$	6,997,928		$	3,116,347		$	13,346,410		$	7,366,911
Return of premiums previously ceded to
prior quota share treaties		5,159,646			-			5,159,646			-
Total Personal lines		12,157,574			3,116,347			18,506,056			7,366,911

Commercial lines
Excluding the effect of quota share
adjustments on July 1		2,157,528			1,582,936			6,583,539			4,151,461
Return of premiums previously ceded to
prior quota share treaties		1,437,345			763,928			1,437,345			763,928
Total Commercial lines		3,594,873			2,346,864			8,020,884			4,915,389

Commercial auto		662,763			1,055,491			2,723,895			3,972,296
Livery physical damage		1,196,027			608,990			3,337,415			1,737,165
Other(1)		56,907			28,143			166,338			128,824
Total	$	17,668,144		$	7,155,835		$	32,754,588		$	18,120,585

Net premiums earned:
Personal lines	$	5,570,792		$	2,576,575		$	10,939,049		$	6,140,241
Commercial lines		2,381,999			1,651,827			5,716,654			3,793,556
Commercial auto		969,934			1,358,744			3,105,243			3,976,237
Livery physical damage		938,287			512,532			2,360,959			1,390,797
Other(1)		33,988			25,906			128,779			124,250
Total	$	9,895,000		$	6,125,584		$	22,250,684		$	15,425,081

Net loss and loss adjustment expenses:
Personal lines	$	877,100		$	1,056,178		$	4,239,455		$	2,674,057
Commercial lines		1,343,194			318,650			2,881,640			748,008
Commercial auto		1,548,361			805,003			2,840,763			3,291,147
Livery physical damage		389,951			221,564			901,779			737,667
Other(1)		94,855			(196,905	)		240,664			133,249
Unallocated loss adjustment expenses		284,706			234,642			766,759			566,442
Total	$	4,538,167		$	2,439,132		$	11,871,060		$	8,150,570

Net loss ratio:
Personal lines		15.7	%		41.0	%		38.8	%		43.5	%
Commercial lines		56.4	%		19.3	%		50.4	%		19.7	%
Commercial auto		159.6	%		59.2	%		91.5	%		82.8	%
Livery physical damage		41.6	%		43.2	%		38.2	%		53.0	%
Other(1)		279.1	%		-760.1	%		186.9	%		107.2	%
Total		45.9	%		39.8	%		53.4	%		52.8	%

__________________________________

(1)	“Other” includes, among other things, premiums and loss and loss adjustment expenses from our participation in a mandatory state joint underwriting association.

Insurance Underwriting Business on a Standalone Basis

Our insurance underwriting business reported on a standalone basis for the periods indicated is as follows:

	Three months ended						Nine months ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013

Revenues
Net premiums earned	$	9,895,000		$	6,125,584		$	22,250,684		$	15,425,081
Ceding commission revenue		3,278,319			3,611,544			10,365,651			8,239,686
Net investment income		463,513			294,348			1,294,216			852,666
Net realized gain on investments		115,176			94,456			438,126			449,474
Other income		204,494			141,175			535,847			409,967
Total revenues		13,956,502			10,267,107			34,884,524			25,376,874

Expenses
Loss and loss adjustment expenses		4,538,167			2,439,132			11,871,060			8,150,570
Commission expense		3,106,064			2,563,055			8,592,364			6,757,959
Other underwriting expenses		2,845,708			2,611,736			7,656,532			6,756,692
Depreciation and amortization		248,042			164,677			639,403			469,955
Total expenses		10,737,981			7,778,600			28,759,359			22,135,176

Income from operations		3,218,521			2,488,507			6,125,165			3,241,698
Income tax expense		1,039,149			719,270			1,961,849			971,434
Net income	$	2,179,372		$	1,769,237		$	4,163,316		$	2,270,264


Key Measures:
Net loss ratio		45.9	%		39.8	%		53.4	%		52.8	%
Net underwriting expense ratio		25.0	%		23.2	%		24.0	%		31.5	%
Net combined ratio		70.9	%		63.0	%		77.4	%		84.3	%

Reconciliation of net underwriting expense ratio:
Acquisition costs and other
underwriting expenses	$	5,951,772		$	5,174,791		$	16,248,896		$	13,514,651
Less: Ceding commission revenue		(3,278,319	)		(3,611,544	)		(10,365,651	)		(8,239,686	)
Less: Other income		(204,494	)		(141,175	)		(535,847	)		(409,967	)
Net underwriting expenses	$	2,468,959		$	1,422,072		$	5,347,398		$	4,864,998

Net premiums earned	$	9,895,000		$	6,125,584		$	22,250,684		$	15,425,081

Net Underwriting Expense Ratio		25.0	%		23.2	%		24.0	%		31.5	%

An analysis of our direct, assumed and ceded earned premiums, loss and loss adjustment expenses, and loss ratios is shown below:

	Direct			Assumed			Ceded			Net

Nine months ended September 30, 2014
Written premiums	$	56,729,057		$	39,263		$	(24,013,732	)	$	32,754,588
Unearned premiums		(7,311,116	)		(6,082	)		(3,186,706	)		(10,503,904	)
Earned premiums	$	49,417,941		$	33,181		$	(27,200,438	)	$	22,250,684

Loss and loss adjustment expenses exluding
the effect of catastrophes	$	19,939,544		$	48,774		$	(9,058,285	)	$	10,930,033
Catastrophe loss		3,764,108			-			(2,823,081	)		941,027
Loss and loss adjustment expenses	$	23,703,652		$	48,774		$	(11,881,366	)	$	11,871,060

Loss ratio excluding the effect of catastrophes		40.3	%		147.0	%		33.3	%		49.1	%
Catastrophe loss		7.7	%		0.0	%		10.4	%		4.3	%
Loss ratio		48.0	%		147.0	%		43.7	%		53.4	%

Nine months ended September 30, 2013
Written premiums	$	44,651,570		$	36,999		$	(26,567,984	)	$	18,120,585
Unearned premiums		(5,465,632	)		17,377			2,752,751			(2,695,504	)
Earned premiums	$	39,185,938		$	54,376		$	(23,815,233	)	$	15,425,081

Loss and loss adjustment expenses exluding
the effect of catastrophes	$	20,052,963		$	42,339		$	(11,980,965	)	$	8,114,337
Catastrophe loss		225,324			-			(189,091	)		36,233
Loss and loss adjustment expenses	$	20,278,287		$	42,339		$	(12,170,056	)	$	8,150,570

Loss ratio excluding the effect of catastrophes		51.2	%		77.9	%		50.3	%		52.6	%
Catastrophe loss		0.6	%		0.0	%		0.8	%		0.2	%
Loss ratio		51.8	%		77.9	%		51.1	%		52.8	%

Three months ended September 30, 2014
Written premiums	$	20,131,112		$	22,961		$	(2,485,929	)	$	17,668,144
Unearned premiums		(2,438,306	)		(12,433	)		(5,322,405	)		(7,773,144	)
Earned premiums	$	17,692,806		$	10,528		$	(7,808,334	)	$	9,895,000

Loss and loss adjustment expenses exluding
the effect of catastrophes	$	4,749,296		$	15,958		$	(227,087	)	$	4,538,167
Catastrophe loss		-			-			-			-
Loss and loss adjustment expenses	$	4,749,296		$	15,958		$	(227,087	)	$	4,538,167

Loss ratio excluding the effect of catastrophes		26.8	%		151.6	%		2.9	%		45.9	%
Catastrophe loss		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%
Loss ratio		26.8	%		151.6	%		2.9	%		45.9	%

Three months ended September 30, 2013
Written premiums	$	15,925,613		$	16,952		$	(8,786,730	)	$	7,155,835
Unearned premiums		(2,013,499	)		(11,192	)		994,440			(1,030,251	)
Earned premiums	$	13,912,114		$	5,760		$	(7,792,290	)	$	6,125,584

Loss and loss adjustment expenses exluding
the effect of catastrophes	$	6,333,066		$	340		$	(3,773,866	)	$	2,559,540
Catastrophe loss		-			-			(120,408	)		(120,408	)
Loss and loss adjustment expenses	$	6,333,066		$	340		$	(3,894,274	)	$	2,439,132

Loss ratio excluding the effect of catastrophes		45.5	%		5.9	%		48.5	%		41.8	%
Catastrophe loss		0.0	%		0.0	%		1.5	%		-2.0	%
Loss ratio		45.5	%		5.9	%		50.0	%		39.8	%

The key measures for our insurance underwriting business for the periods indicated are as follows:

	Three months ended						Nine months ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013

Net premiums earned	$	9,895,000		$	6,125,584		$	22,250,684		$	15,425,081
Ceding commission revenue (1)		3,278,319			3,611,544			10,365,651			8,239,686
Other income		204,494			141,175			535,847			409,967

Loss and loss adjustment expenses (2)		4,538,167			2,439,132			11,871,060			8,150,570

Acquistion costs and other underwriting expenses:
Commission expense		3,106,064			2,563,055			8,592,364			6,757,959
Other underwriting expenses		2,845,708			2,611,736			7,656,532			6,756,692
Total acquistion costs and other
underwriting expenses		5,951,772			5,174,791			16,248,896			13,514,651

Underwriting income	$	2,887,874		$	2,264,380		$	5,032,226		$	2,409,513

Key Measures:
Net loss ratio excluding the effect of catastrophes		45.9	%		41.8	%		49.1	%		52.6	%
Effect of catastrophe loss on net loss ratio (2) (3)		0.0	%		-2.0	%		4.3	%		0.2	%
Net loss ratio		45.9	%		39.8	%		53.4	%		52.8	%

Net underwriting expense ratio excluding the
effect of catastrophes		25.0	%		23.2	%		21.7	%		19.6	%
Effect of catastrophe loss on net underwriting
expense ratio (1) (2) (3)		0.0	%		0.0	%		2.3	%		11.9	%
Net underwriting expense ratio		25.0	%		23.2	%		24.0	%		31.5	%

Net combined ratio excluding the effect
of catastrophes		70.9	%		65.0	%		70.8	%		72.2	%
Effect of catastrophe loss on net combined
ratio (1) (2) (3)		0.0	%		-2.0	%		6.6	%		12.1	%
Net combined ratio		70.9	%		63.0	%		77.4	%		84.3	%

Reconciliation of net underwriting expense ratio:
Acquisition costs and other
underwriting expenses	$	5,951,772		$	5,174,791		$	16,248,896		$	13,514,651
Less: Ceding commission revenue (1)		(3,278,319	)		(3,611,544	)		(10,365,651	)		(8,239,686	)
Less: Other income		(204,494	)		(141,175	)		(535,847	)		(409,967	)
	$	2,468,959		$	1,422,072		$	5,347,398		$	4,864,998

_________________________________________________

(1) For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the effect of severe winter weather, defined as a catastrophe, which occurred in January and February 2014, reduced contingent ceding commission revenue by $517,269. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the effect of Superstorm Sandy, which occurred on October 29, 2012, reduced contingent ceding commission revenue by $1,846,882.

(2) For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, includes the sum of net catastrophe losses and loss adjustment expenses of $941,027 resulting from severe winter weather, which occurred in January and February 2014.

(3) For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the effect of catastrophe loss from severe winter weather on our net combined ratio only includes the direct effects of loss and loss adjustment expenses and ceding commission revenue and does not include the indirect effects of a $163,673 decrease in other underwriting expenses. For the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2013, the effect of catastrophe loss from Superstorm Sandy on our net loss ratio and net combined ratio only includes the direct effects of loss and loss adjustment expenses and ceding commission revenue and does not include $464,138 and $140,078, respectively, of reinstatement premiums for catastrophe coverage or the indirect effects of a respective $352,088 and $2,951 decrease in other underwriting expenses.

Investments

Portfolio Summary

The following table presents a breakdown of the amortized cost, aggregate fair value and unrealized gains and losses by investment type as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

Available for Sale Securities

	September 30, 2014

	Cost or		Gross		Gross Unrealized Losses						Aggregate		% of
	Amortized		Unrealized		Less than 12			More than 12			Fair		Fair
Category	Cost		Gains		Months			Months			Value		Value

Political subdivisions of States,
Territories and Possessions	$	13,807,507	$	430,058	$	(38,144	)	$	(6,818	)	$	14,192,603		24.8	%

Corporate and other bonds
Industrial and miscellaneous		33,140,595		823,439		(106,702	)		(51,037	)		33,806,295		59.1	%
Total fixed-maturity securities		46,948,102		1,253,497		(144,846	)		(57,855	)		47,998,898		83.9	%
Equity Securities		8,857,992		443,043		(57,914	)		(82,377	)		9,160,744		16.1	%
Total	$	55,806,094	$	1,696,540	$	(202,760	)	$	(140,232	)	$	57,159,642		100.0	%

	December 31, 2013

	Cost or		Gross		Gross Unrealized Losses						Aggregate		% of
	Amortized		Unrealized		Less than 12			More than 12			Fair		Fair
Category	Cost		Gains		Months			Months			Value		Value

Political subdivisions of States,
Territories and Possessions	$	7,000,222	$	162,616	$	(49,491	)	$	(45,140	)	$	7,068,207		20.1	%

Corporate and other bonds
Industrial and miscellaneous		21,079,680		569,139		(179,810	)		(101,194	)		21,367,815		60.6	%
Total fixed-maturity securities		28,079,902		731,755		(229,301	)		(146,334	)		28,436,022		80.7	%
Equity Securities		6,690,338		473,109		(290,310	)		(76,464	)		6,796,673		19.3	%
Total	$	34,770,240	$	1,204,864	$	(519,611	)	$	(222,798	)	$	35,232,695		100.0	%

Held to Maturity Securities

	September 30, 2014


	Cost or		Gross		Gross Unrealized Losses								% of
	Amortized		Unrealized		Less than 12			More than 12			Fair		Fair
Category	Cost		Gains		Months			Months			Value		Value

U.S. Treasury securities	$	606,344	$	126,344	$	-		$	-		$	732,688		13.7	%

Political subdivisions of States,
Territories and Possessions		1,412,284		42,046		-			(10,068	)		1,444,262		27.1	%

Corporate and other bonds
Industrial and miscellaneous		3,106,657		74,332		(23,880	)		-			3,157,106		59.2	%

Total	$	5,125,285	$	242,722	$	(23,880	)	$	(10,068	)	$	5,334,056		100.0	%

	December 31, 2013

	Cost or		Gross		Gross Unrealized Losses							% of
	Amortized		Unrealized		Less than 12			More than 12		Fair		Fair
Category	Cost		Gains		Months			Months		Value		Value

U.S. Treasury securities	$	606,138	$	46,915	$	-		$	-	$	653,053		26.9	%

Political subdivisions of States,
Territories and Possessions		208,697		-		(25,359	)		-		183,338		7.6	%

Corporate and other bonds
Industrial and miscellaneous		1,584,647		4,223		-			-		1,588,870		65.5	%

Total	$	2,399,482	$	51,138	$	(25,359	)	$	-	$	2,425,261		100.0	%

U.S. Treasury securities included in held to maturity securities are held in trust pursuant to the New York State Department of Financial Services’ minimum funds requirement.

A summary of the amortized cost and fair value of the Company’s investments in held-to-maturity securities by contractual maturity as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 is shown below:

	September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Amortized				Amortized
Remaining Time to Maturity	Cost		Fair Value		Cost		Fair Value

Less than one year	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
One to five years		-		-		-		-
Five to ten years		3,318,492		3,358,874		1,793,344		1,772,208
More than 10 years		1,806,793		1,975,182		606,138		653,053
Total	$	5,125,285	$	5,334,056	$	2,399,482	$	2,425,261

Credit Rating of Fixed-Maturity Securities

The table below summarizes the credit quality of our available for sale fixed-maturity securities as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 as rated by Standard & Poor’s (or, if unavailable from Standard & Poor’s, then Moody’s or Fitch):

	September 30, 2014					December 31, 2013
			Percentage of					Percentage of
	Fair Market		Fair Market			Fair Market		Fair Market
	Value		Value			Value		Value

Rating
AAA	$	2,755,235		5.7	%	$	2,075,010		7.3	%
AA		9,586,299		20.0	%		4,566,384		16.1	%
A		13,064,027		27.2	%		7,680,343		27.0	%
BBB		22,592,337		47.1	%		14,114,285		49.6	%
Total	$	47,997,898		100.0	%	$	28,436,022		100.0	%

The table below summarizes the average yield by type of fixed-maturity security as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

Category	September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
corporations and agencies		3.55	%		3.98	%

Political subdivisions of States,
Territories and Possessions		3.80	%		4.34	%

Corporate and other bonds
Industrial and miscellaneous		4.25	%		4.69	%

Total		4.14	%		4.59	%

The table below lists the weighted average maturity and effective duration in years on our fixed-maturity securities as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Weighted average effective maturity		6.8		6.8

Weighted average final maturity		7.4		7.4

Effective duration		6.0		5.8

Fair Value Consideration

As disclosed in Note 4 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, with respect to “Fair Value Measurements,” we define fair value under GAAP guidance as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in a transaction involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities between market participants (an “exit price”). This GAAP guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between inputs based on market data from independent sources (“observable inputs”) and a reporting entity’s internal assumptions based upon the best information available when external market data is limited or unavailable (“unobservable inputs”). The fair value hierarchy in GAAP prioritizes fair value measurements into three levels based on the nature of the inputs. Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets have the highest priority (“Level 1”), followed by observable inputs other than quoted prices including prices for similar but not identical assets or liabilities (“Level 2”), and unobservable inputs, including the reporting entity’s estimates of the assumption that market participants would use, having the lowest priority (“Level 3”). As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, 62% and 78%, respectively, of the investment portfolio recorded at fair value was priced based upon quoted market prices.

As more fully described in Note 3 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Investments—Impairment Review,” we completed a detailed review of all our securities in a continuous loss position as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and concluded that the unrealized losses in these asset classes are temporary in nature and the result of a decrease in value due to technical spread widening and broader market sentiment, rather than fundamental collateral deterioration.

The table below summarizes the gross unrealized losses of our fixed-maturity securities available-for-sale and equity securities by length of time the security has continuously been in an unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

	September 30, 2014
	Less than 12 months							12 months or more							Total
						No. of							No. of		Aggregate
	Fair		Unrealized			Positions		Fair		Unrealized			Positions		Fair		Unrealized
Category	Value		Losses			Held		Value		Losses			Held		Value		Losses

Political subdivisions of
States, Territories and
Possessions	$	2,149,022	$	(38,144	)		7	$	541,806	$	(6,818	)		2	$	2,690,828	$	(44,962	)

Corporate and other
bonds industrial and
miscellaneous		6,040,156		(106,702	)		12		993,653		(51,037	)		3		7,033,809		(157,739	)

Total fixed-maturity
securities	$	8,189,178	$	(144,846	)		19	$	1,535,459	$	(57,855	)		5	$	9,724,637	$	(202,701	)

Equity Securities:
Preferred stocks	$	652,950	$	(6,022	)		1	$	1,635,873	$	(82,377	)		7	$	2,288,823	$	(88,399	)
Common stocks		1,541,225		(51,892	)		6		-		-			-		1,541,225		(51,892	)

Total equity securities	$	2,194,175	$	(57,914	)		7	$	1,635,873	$	(82,377	)		7	$	3,830,048	$	(140,291	)

Total	$	10,383,353	$	(202,760	)		26	$	3,171,332	$	(140,232	)		12	$	13,554,685	$	(342,992	)

	December 31, 2013
	Less than 12 months							12 months or more							Total
						No. of							No. of		Aggregate
	Fair		Unrealized			Positions		Fair		Unrealized			Positions		Fair		Unrealized
Category	Value		Losses			Held		Value		Losses			Held		Value		Losses

Fixed-Maturity Securities:
Political subdivisions of
States, Territories and
Possessions	$	2,015,437	$	(49,491	)		6	$	415,866	$	(45,140	)		2	$	2,431,303	$	(94,631	)

Corporate and other
bonds industrial and
miscellaneous		6,447,605		(179,810	)		24		1,430,377		(101,194	)		5		7,877,982		(281,004	)

Total fixed-maturity
securities	$	8,463,042	$	(229,301	)		30	$	1,846,243	$	(146,334	)		7	$	10,309,285	$	(375,635	)

Equity Securities:
Preferred stocks	$	1,835,958	$	(251,525	)		8	$	444,100	$	(62,551	)		2	$	2,280,058	$	(314,076	)
Common stocks		879,525		(38,785	)		4		145,625		(13,913	)		1		1,025,150		(52,698	)

Total equity securities	$	2,715,483	$	(290,310	)		12	$	589,725	$	(76,464	)		3	$	3,305,208	$	(366,774	)

Total	$	11,178,525	$	(519,611	)		42	$	2,435,968	$	(222,798	)		10	$	13,614,493	$	(742,409	)

There were 38 securities at September 30, 2014 that accounted for the gross unrealized loss, none of which were deemed by us to be other than temporarily impaired. There were 52 securities at December 31, 2013 that accounted for the gross unrealized loss, none of which were deemed by us to be other than temporarily impaired. Significant factors influencing our determination that unrealized losses were temporary included the magnitude of the unrealized losses in relation to each security’s cost, the nature of the investment and management’s intent not to sell these securities and it being not more likely than not that we will be required to sell these investments before anticipated recovery of fair value to our cost basis.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows

The primary sources of cash flow are from our insurance underwriting subsidiary, KICO, and include direct premiums written, ceding commissions from our quota share reinsurers, loss recovery payments from our reinsurers, investment income and proceeds from the sale or maturity of investments. Funds are used by KICO for ceded premium payments to reinsurers, which are paid on a net basis after subtracting losses paid on reinsured claims and reinsurance commissions. KICO also uses funds for loss payments and loss adjustment expenses on our net business, commissions to producers, salaries and other underwriting expenses as well as to purchase investments and fixed assets.

The primary sources of cash flow for our holding company operations are in connection with the fee income we receive from the premium finance loans (as more fully described in Note 12 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). We also receive cash dividends from KICO, subject to statutory restrictions. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, KICO paid dividends of $1,100,000 to us.

On December 13, 2013, we completed an underwritten public offering of 3,450,000 shares of our common stock, including 450,000 shares issued pursuant to the underwriter’s 30-day over-allotment option, at a public offering price of $5.95 per share. The aggregate net proceeds we received were $18,804,000, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses. We used the net proceeds of the offering to contribute $15,000,000 of capital to our insurance subsidiary, KICO, to support its growth, including possible product expansion, to repay the $747,000 outstanding balance of our notes and to repay the $210,000 outstanding balance on our credit line. A registration statement relating to these securities was filed with the SEC and became effective on December 9, 2013.

We have an agreement with a bank for a $600,000 line of credit to be used for general corporate needs. The principal balance is payable on demand, and must be reduced to zero for a minimum of 30 consecutive days during each year of the term of the credit line. There were no borrowings on the credit line during the nine months ended September 30, 2014, and the outstanding principal balance was $-0- as of September 30, 2014.

If the aforementioned is insufficient to cover our holding company cash requirements, we will seek to obtain additional financing.

Our reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operations is generally influenced by the collection of premiums in advance of paid losses, the timing of reinsurance, issuing company settlements and loss payments.

Cash flow and liquidity are categorized into three sources: (1) operating activities; (2) investing activities; and (3) financing activities, which are shown in the following table:

Nine Months Ended September 30,	2014			2013

Cash flows provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	10,313,334		$	5,175,104
Investing activities		(24,228,173	)		(2,398,818	)
Financing activities		(979,662	)		(829,638	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(14,894,501	)		1,946,648
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		19,922,506			2,240,012
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	5,028,005		$	4,186,660

Net cash provided by operating activities was $10,313,000 in 2014 as compared to $5,175,000 provided in 2013. The $5,138,000 increase in cash flows provided by operating activities in 2014 was primarily a result of an increase in net income (adjusted for non-cash items) of $2,689,000 and the net fluctuations in assets and liabilities of $2,524,000 relating to operating activities of KICO as affected by the growth in its operations which are described above.

Net cash used in investing activities was $24,228,000 in 2014 compared to $2,399,000 used in 2013. The $21,829,000 increase in cash flows used in investing activities is the result of a $23,033,000 increase in acquisitions of invested assets, offset by a $1,607,000 increase in sales of invested assets.

Net cash used in financing activities was $980,000 in 2014 compared to $830,000 used in 2013. The $150,000 increase in cash flows used in financing activities is a result of the $487,000 increase in dividends paid due additional shares outstanding in 2014 and the increase in dividend rate, offset by a $240,000 reduction in the net repayments on our credit line in 2014 compared 2013.

Reinsurance

Our quota share reinsurance treaties in effect for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 for our Personal Lines business, which primarily consists of homeowners’ policies, were covered under the July 1, 2013/June 30, 2014 and July 1, 2014/June 30, 2015 treaty years. Our quota share reinsurance treaty in effect for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 for our Commercial Lines business was covered under the July 1, 2013/June 30, 2014 treaty year. We did not renew our expiring Commercial Lines quota share reinsurance treaty on July 1, 2014. Our quota share reinsurance treaties in effect for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 for both our Personal Lines business and Commercial Lines business were covered under the July 1, 2012/June 30, 2013 and July 1, 2013/June 30, 2014 treaty years. Our personal lines quota share treaty that covered the July 1, 2013/June 30, 2014 treaty year is a two year treaty expiring on June 30, 2015. Effective as of July 1, 2014, we had the option to increase the quota share percentage from 75% to a maximum of 85% or decrease the quota share percentage from 75% to a minimum of 55% by giving no less than 30 days advance notice. On May 12, 2014, we notified the personal lines reinsurers of our election to reduce the ceding percentage in the personal lines quota share treaty from 75% to 55% effective July 1, 2014. In addition to the change in the personal lines quota share treaty discussed above, we entered into new annual treaties with different terms effective July 1, 2014. Our treaties for the July 1, 2012/June 30, 2013, July 1, 2013/ June 30, 2014 and July 1, 2014/June 30, 2015 treaty years provide for the following material terms:

	Treaty Year
	July 1, 2014			July 1, 2013			July 1, 2012
	to			to			to
Line of Busines	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013

Personal Lines:
Homeowners, dwelling fire and canine legal liability
Quota share treaty:
Percent ceded		55	%		75	%		75	%
Risk retained	$	360,000		$	300,000		$	250,000
Losses per occurrence subject to quota share reinsurance coverage	$	800,000		$	1,200,000		$	1,000,000
Excess of loss coverage above quota share coverage	$	3,200,000		$	1,700,000		$	1,900,000
	in excess of			in excess of			in excess of
	$	800,000		$	1,200,000		$	1,000,000
Total reinsurance coverage per occurrence	$	3,640,000		$	2,600,000		$	2,650,000
Losses per occurrence subject to reinsurance coverage	$	4,000,000		$	2,900,000		$	2,900,000
Expiration date	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2015			June 30, 2013

Personal Umbrella
Quota share treaty:
Percent ceded - first million dollars of coverage		90	%		90	%		90	%
Percent ceded - excess of one million dollars of coverage		100	%		100	%		100	%
Total reinsurance coverage per occurrence	$	2,900,000		$	1,900,000		$	1,900,000
Losses per occurrence subject to quota share reinsurance coverage	$	3,000,000		$	2,000,000		$	2,000,000
Expiration date	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013

Commercial Lines:
General liability commercial policies, except for commercial auto
Quota share treaty:
Percent ceded (terminated effective July 1, 2014)	None				25	%		40	%
Risk retained	$	400,000		$	300,000		$	300,000
Losses per occurrence subject to quota share reinsurance coverage	None			$	400,000		$	500,000
Excess of loss coverage above quota share coverage	$	3,600,000		$	2,500,000		$	2,400,000
	in excess of			in excess of			in excess of
	$	400,000		$	400,000		$	500,000
Total reinsurance coverage per occurrence	$	3,600,000		$	2,600,000		$	2,600,000
Losses per occurrence subject to reinsurance coverage	$	4,000,000		$	2,900,000		$	2,900,000

Commercial Auto:
Excess of loss coverage in excess of risk retained	$	1,700,000		$	1,700,000		$	1,750,000
	in excess of			in excess of			in excess of
	$	300,000		$	300,000		$	250,000
Catastrophe Reinsurance:
Initial loss subject to personal lines quota share treaty	$	4,000,000		$	4,000,000		$	3,000,000
Risk retained per catastrophe occurrence (1)	$	1,800,000		$	1,000,000		$	750,000
Catastrophe loss coverage in excess of quota share coverage (2) (3)	$	137,000,000		$	86,000,000		$	70,000,000

(1)	Plus losses in excess of catastrophe coverage.

(2)	Effective July 1, 2014, our catastrophe treaty also covers losses caused by severe winter weather during any consecutive 28 day period.

(3)	Catastrophe coverage is limited on an annual basis to two times the per occurrence amounts. Effective July 1, 2014, the duration of a catastrophe occurrence from windstorm, hail, tornado, hurricane and cyclone has been extended to 96 consecutive hours from 72 consecutive hours.

The single maximum risks per occurrence to which we are subject to under the treaties that expired on June 30, 2014 and the new treaties effective July 1, 2014 are as follows:

	July 1, 2014 - June 30, 2015		July 1, 2013 - June 30, 2014
Treaty	Extent of Loss	Risk Retained	Extent of Loss	Risk Retained
Personal Lines	Initial $800,000	$360,000	Initial $1,200,000	$300,000
	$800,000 - $4,000,000	None(1)	$1,200,000 - $2,900,000	None(1)
	Over $4,000,000	100%	Over $2,900,000	100%

Personal Umbrella	Initial $1,000,000	$100,000	Initial $1,000,000	$100,000
	$1,000,000 - $3,000,000	None(1)	$1,000,000 - $2,000,000	None(1)
	Over $3,000,000	100%	Over $2,000,000	100%

Commercial Lines	Initial $400,000	$400,000	Initial $400,000	$300,000
	$400,000 - $4,000,000	None(1)	$400,000 - $2,900,000	None(1)
	Over $4,000,000	100%	Over $2,900,000	100%

Commercial Auto	Initial $300,000	$300,000	Initial $300,000	$300,000
	$300,000 - $2,000,000	None(1)	$300,000 - $2,000,000	None(1)
	Over $2,000,000	100%	Over $2,000,000	100%

Catastrophe (2)	Initial $4,000,000	$1,800,000	Initial $4,000,000	$1,000,000
	$4,000,000 - $141,000,000	None	$4,000,000 - $90,000,000	None
	Over $141,000,000	100%	Over $90,000,000	100%

________________

(1)	Covered by excess of loss treaties.

(2)	Catastrophe coverage is limited on an annual basis to two times the per occurrence amounts.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Factors That May Affect Future Results and Financial Condition

Based upon the factors set forth under “Factors That May Affect Future Results and Financial Condition” in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as well as other factors affecting our operating results and financial condition, past financial performance should not be considered to be a reliable indicator of future performance, and investors should not use historical trends to anticipate results or trends in future periods. In addition, such factors, among others, may affect the accuracy of certain forward-looking statements contained in our periodic reports, including this Quarterly Report.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Not applicable

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) that are designed to assure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

As required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b), as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2014.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

None

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Not applicable

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

(a)

None

(b)

Not applicable

(c)

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to purchases of common stock made by us or any “affiliated purchaser” during the quarter ended September 30, 2014:

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased			Average Price Paid per Share(1)		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number of Shares that May Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs

7/1/14 – 7/31/14		3,380		$	6.96		-		-
8/1/14 – 8/31/14		3,333	(1)	$	7.15		-		-
9/1/14 – 9/30/14		8,555	(1)	$	7.61		-		-
Total		15,268		$	7.37		-		-

(1)	Shares purchased by “affiliated purchaser”.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable

Item 5. Other Information.

None

Item 6. Exhibits.

3(a)		Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended1

3(b)		By-laws, as amended2

31(a)		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31(b)		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.

101.CAL		101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.

101.DEF		101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.

101.LAB		101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.

101.PRE		101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.

1 Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.

2 Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K for an event dated November 5, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC.

November 13, 2014	By:	/s/ Barry B. Goldstein
		Barry B. Goldstein
		President

November 13, 2014	By:	/s/ Victor Brodsky
		Victor Brodsky
		Chief Financial Officer

KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. - FORM 10-Q - November 13, 2014

Attached files

KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. Reports