The board of directors engaged MaloneBailey on December 20, 2010 and MaloneBailey did not report on our company’s financial statements during our company’s fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. On April 1, 2011, MaloneBailey provided an electronic communication to our company, advising that it had encountered issues and concerns during the audit, specifically irregularities in the books and records of our company, that, in MaloneBailey’s view, required additional information and procedures, including the initiation of an independent investigation, in order to verify the accuracy of the books and records recorded on our company’s financial statements and records for the year ended December 31, 2010. On April 8, 2011, our company received a notice of resignation from MaloneBailey indicating that it had resigned its engagement with our company, effective immediately. In its letter of resignation, MaloneBailey based its resignation on what it believed are accounting irregularities noted during the audit of our company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. The issues encountered during the audit of our company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, in MaloneBailey’s view, included the following: (1) issues related to the authenticity of a set of bank statements and a loss of confidence in bank confirmation procedures; (2) issues concerning the validity and existence of a material revenue transaction with a certain customer and (3) issues concerning that management tampered with the process of auditors’ independent confirmation of bank statements and revenue. Our company believes that it was taking appropriate steps to respond to MaloneBailey’s recommendations for further investigation prior to the resignation of MaloneBailey, but MaloneBailey did not agree with our company’s assertion in this regard.

Other than as set forth above, from December 20, 2010 when Malone Bailey was engaged, through MaloneBailey’s resignation on April 8, 2011, there were (1) no disagreements with MaloneBailey on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of MaloneBailey would have caused MaloneBailey to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its reports, and (2) no events of the type listed in paragraphs (A) through (D) of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

Our company furnished MaloneBailey with a copy of this disclosure on April 8, 2011, providing it with the opportunity to furnish our company with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether it agrees with the statements made by our company herein in response to Item 304(a) of Regulation S-K and, if not, stating the respect in which it does not agree. A letter from Malone Bailey, dated April 8, 2011 incorporated by reference, is filed as Exhibit 16.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2011.

On October 8, 2014, our board of directors approved and authorized the engagement of PLS CPA, A Professional Corporation (“PLS CPA”) as our independent public accountants.

Prior to engaging PLS CPA on October 8, 2014, PLS CPA did not provide our company with either written or oral advice that was an important factor considered by our company in reaching a decision to change our independent registered public accounting firm from MaloneBailey, to PLS CPA.

Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.