CES Synergies, Inc. - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - CES Synergies, Inc.	Financial_Report.xls
EX-31.1 - CERTFICATION - CES Synergies, Inc.	f10q0614ex31i_cessynergies.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTFICATION - CES Synergies, Inc.	f10q0614ex32i_cessynergies.htm
EX-31.2 - CERTFICATION - CES Synergies, Inc.	f10q0614ex31ii_cessynergies.htm
EX-32.2 - CERTFICATION - CES Synergies, Inc.	f10q0614ex32ii_cessynergies.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014
or

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 000-55159

CES Synergies, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Nevada		460839941
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

39646 Fig Street P.O. Box 1299 Crystal Springs, FL		33524
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number including area code: 813-783-1688

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

Applicable Only to Corporate Issuers:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

Class		Outstanding as of August 4, 2014
Common Stock, $0.001 par value		46,686,500

CES SYNERGIES, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Page
Item 1. Financial Statements.	1

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	13

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	28

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.	28

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.	29

Item 1A. Risk Factors.	29

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	29

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.	29

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.	29

Item 5. Other Information.	29

Item 6. Exhibits	29

SIGNATURES	30

PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CES SYNERGIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

	June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013

ASSETS

Current Assets
Cash	$	315,090		$	250,359
Advances to Employees		13,087			20,223
Contracts Receivable (net of allow. for Bad Debt)		3,773,269			3,965,709
Inventory		112,870			153,990
Cost and Estimated Earnings in Excess
of Billings on Uncompleted Contracts		696,449			809,548
Total Current Assets		4,910,765			5,199,829

Property and Equipment
Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment		12,595,677			12,233,734
Less: Accumulated Depreciation		(10,349,583	)		(10,072,916	)
Net Property & Equipment		2,246,094			2,160,818

Other Assets
Goodwill		1,446,855			1,446,855
Other Assets		7,414			29,505
Total Other Assets		1,454,269			1,476,360
TOTAL ASSETS	$	8,611,128		$	8,837,007

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable	$	1,033,885		$	1,260,709
Accrued Payroll/Expenses		24,946			123,356
Billings in Excess of Costs and Estimated Earnings on Uncompleted Contracts		287,617			518,612
Florida Traditions Line of Credit		1,750,300			-
Current Portion Long-term Debt		666,556			472,372
Total Current Liabilities		3,763,304			2,375,049
Long-Term Liabilities
Long-term debt, net of current portion		3,272,285			4,731,468
Total Long-Term Liabilities		3,272,285			4,731,468

Stockholders' Equity
Common Stock, $.001 par value, authorized 250,000,000 shares at June 30, 2014
75,000,000 shares at December 31, 2013
Issued: 46,686,500 shares at June 30, 2014; and 46,525,000 shares at December 31, 2013		46,686			46,525
Treasury Stock, 80 Shares, at Cost		0			(129,356	)
Additional Paid in Capital		1,243,692			1,084,058
Retained Earnings		285,161			722,263
Total Stockholders' Equity		1,575,539			1,730,490
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	8,611,128		$	8,837,007

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

CES SYNERGIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

	Three Months ended					Six Months ended
	June 30, 2014		June 30, 2013			June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
Revenues	$	4,680,854	$	3,368,519		$	8,493,439		$	6,768,486
Cost of sales		3,353,800		2,822,936			6,513,875			5,326,452
Gross profit		1,327,054		545,583			1,979,564			1,442,033
General & administrative expenses		1,265,463		907,386			2,441,107			1,702,157
Net operating profit/(loss)		61,591		(361,803	)		(461,543	)		(260,124	)
Other income/ (expenses), net		76,563		(68,246	)		24,441			(103,478	)

Net profit/(loss)	$	138,154	$	(430,049	)	$	(437,102	)	$	(363,602	)
Earnings per share
Basic and diluted	$	0.003	$	(2,688	)	$	(0.009	)	$	(2,273	)
Shares used in computing earnings per share
Basic and diluted		46,549,000		160			46,549,000			160
Cash distributions declared per common share	$	-	$	160,619		$	-		$	434,607

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

CES SYNERGIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	Six months ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
Operating Activities
Net Income	$	(437,102	)	$	(363,602	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided (used) by operating activities
Depreciation Expense		276,667			293,703
(Gain)/Loss on Disposal of Assets
Decrease (Increase) in:
Contracts Receivable		192,440			174,330
Other Assets		29,227			18,380
Inventories		41,120			37,858
Cost & Estimated Earnings in Excess of Billings on Uncompleted Contracts		113,099			(86,349	)
Increase (Decrease) in:
Accounts Payable		(226,824	)		252,061
Accrued Liabilities		(98,410	)		36,036
Billings in Excess of Costs and Estimate Earnings		(230,995	)		372,511
Total Adjustments		96,324			1,098,530
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities	$	(340,778	)	$	734,928

Investing Activities:
Purchase of Property and Equipment		(361,943	)		(301,982	)
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities		(361,943	)		(301,982	)

Financing Activities:
New Borrowings		5,206,356			691,960
Debt Reduction		(4,721,054	)		(222,725	)
Capital Contributed		282,150
Distributions		-			(434,607	)
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities		767,452			34,628

Net increase (decrease) in cash		64,731			467,574

Cash at beginning of year		250,359			132,442

Cash at end of quarter	$	315,090		$	600,016

Supplemental Disclosures
Interest paid	$	117,120		$	78,371
Income taxes paid	$	-		$	-

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

CES SYNERGIES, INC.

JUNE 30, 2014

(Unaudited)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - Company Background

CES Synergies, Inc. (the Company) is a Nevada corporation formed on April 26, 2010. The Company is the parent company of Cross Environmental Services, Inc. (CES) which was incorporated in 1988 in the state of Florida. The Company acquired CES in a reverse merger transaction that closed on November 1, 2013, and CES is deemed the accounting acquirer under accounting rules (see note 14). The Company is an asbestos and lead abatement contracting firm specializing in the removal of asbestos and lead from buildings and other structures, and demolition of structures. The Company's services include removal of asbestos and lead, construction, installation, and repair of ceilings and insulation systems and demolition. Most jobs are located within the state of Florida, but the Company accepts and performs jobs throughout the southeastern United States.

NOTE 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

This summary of significant accounting policies of the Company is presented to assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements.

The Company follows the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and has adopted a year-end of December 31.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("US GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Management further acknowledges that it is solely responsible for adopting sound accounting practices consistently applied, establishing and maintaining a system of internal accounting control and preventing and detecting fraud. The Company’s system of internal accounting control is designed to assure, among other items, that 1) recorded transactions are valid; 2) valid transactions are recorded; and 3) transactions are recorded in the proper period in a timely manner to produce financial statements which present fairly the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the respective periods being presented.

Basis of Presentation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. These include the accounts of Cross Environmental Services, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Cross Demolition, Inc., Cross Insulation, Inc., Cross Remediation, Inc., Cross FRP, Inc., Triple J Trucking, Inc., and Tenpoint Trucking, Inc. All significant intercompany account balances, transactions, profits and losses have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

For certain financial instruments, including accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, interest payable, advances payable and notes payable, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their relatively short maturities.

The Company adopted ASC 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” ASC 820-10 defines fair value, and establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement that enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for receivables and current liabilities each qualify as financial instruments and are a reasonable estimate of their fair values because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and their current market rate of interest. The three levels of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:

·	Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

·	Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

·	Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

The Company did not identify any non-recurring assets and liabilities that are required to be presented in the balance sheets at fair value in accordance with ASC 815.

In February 2007, the FASB issued ASC 825-10 “Financial Instruments.” ASC 825-10 permits entities to choose to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. ASC 825-10 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007.

The carrying amounts of cash and current liabilities approximate fair value due to the short maturity of these items. These fair value estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment, and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimates. The Company does not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes, nor does it utilize derivative instruments in the management of foreign exchange, commodity price, or interest rate market risks.

Revenue and Cost Recognition

The Company follows ASC 605-35 "Revenue Recognition: Construction type contracts" and recognizes revenues from fixed-price and modified fixed-price construction contracts on the percentage-of-completion method, measured by the percentage of cost incurred to date to estimated total cost for each contract. This method is used because management considers total cost to be the best available measure of progress on the contracts.

Contract costs include all direct material and labor costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor, supplies, tools, repairs, and depreciation. Selling, general, and administrative costs are charged to expenses as incurred. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts, if any, are made in the period in which such losses are determined. Changes in job performance, job conditions, and estimated profitability may result in revisions to costs and income which are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined.

The asset, "Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts," represents revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed.

The liability, "Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts," represents billings in excess of revenues recognized.

Contract retentions are included in contracts receivable.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of reporting cash flows, the Company considers cash and cash equivalents to be all highly liquid deposits with maturities of three months or less. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates market value.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

The Company maintains cash balances at Florida Traditions Bank located in Central Florida. The cash accounts are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. At June 30, 2014, the Company’s uninsured cash balances for those accounts were $65,090.

Special purpose entities

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet financing activities.

Contracts Receivable

Contracts receivable are recorded when invoices are issued and presented in the balance sheet net of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Contract receivables are written off when they are determined to be uncollectible. The allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based on the Company's historical average percentage of bad debts in relation to its revenue.

Inventory, Net

Inventories consist primarily of job materials and supplies and are priced at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for major additions and improvements are capitalized. As property and equipment are sold or retired, the applicable cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss thereon is recognized as operating expenses.

Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives or, in the case of leasehold improvements, the term of the related lease, including renewal periods, if shorter. Estimated useful lives are as follows:

Equipment 3-10 years

The Company reviews property, plant and equipment and all amortizable intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability is based on estimated undiscounted cash flows. Measurement of the impairment loss, if any, is based on the difference between the carrying value and fair value.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Amortizable Intangible Assets

The Company follows ASC 360-10, “Property, Plant, and Equipment,” which established a “primary asset” approach to determine the cash flow estimation period for a group of assets and liabilities that represents the unit of accounting for a long-lived asset to be held and used. Long-lived assets to be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Through June 30, 2014, the Company had not experienced impairment losses on its long-lived assets.

Intangible Assets - Goodwill

Cost of investment in purchased company assets (Simpson & Associates, Inc.) in excess of the underlying fair value of net assets at dates of acquisition (March 2001) is recorded as goodwill on the balance sheet. The amount of $1,396,855 was acquired in 2001 and an additional $50,000 was reclassified as goodwill in 2002. Goodwill is not amortized, but instead is assessed for impairment at least annually and upon the occurrence of certain triggering events or substantive changes in circumstances that indicate that the fair value of goodwill may be impaired. Measurement of the impairment loss, if any, is based on the difference between the carrying value and fair value of the reporting unit. The goodwill impairment test follows a two-step process. In the first step, the fair value of a reporting unit is compared to its carrying value. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the impairment test is performed for purposes of measuring the impairment. In the second step, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit to determine an implied goodwill value. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, an impairment loss will be recognized in an amount equal to that excess. There were no material impairments to the carrying value of long-lived assets and intangible assets subject to amortization during the periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Business segments

ASC 280, “Segment Reporting” requires use of the “management approach” model for segment reporting. The management approach model is based on the way a company’s management organizes segments within the company for making operating decisions and assessing performance. The Company determined it has three operating segments as of June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013.

Income Taxes

For the period January 1 through October 31, 2013 CES elected by unanimous consent of its shareholders to be taxed under the provisions of subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code. Under those provisions, the Company does not pay federal or state corporate income taxes on its taxable income. Instead, the stockholders are liable for individual federal income taxes on their respective shares of the company's taxable income. As of November 1, 2013 (see note 14) the Company terminated this election. Due to the status of the Company for the first part of 2013 and the loss incurred in the six months ended June 30, 2014, no provision or liability for Federal income taxes is included on these financial statements.

Net Income per Share

The Company computes net income (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260-10, “Earnings Per Share.” The basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the “as if converted” basis. For the years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 there were no potential dilutive securities.

Common Stock

There is currently only one class of common stock. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote. The authorized number of common stock of CES Synergies, Inc. at December 31, 2013 was 75,000,000 shares with a nominal par value per share of $.001. Authorized shares that have been issued and fully paid amounted to 46,686,500 at June 30, 2014 compared to 160 common shares at June 30, 2013. Effective March 10, 2014, the Company filed a certificate of amendment to the Company’s articles of incorporation with the Secretary of State of Nevada to increase the Company’s authorized shares of common stock from 75,000,000 to 250,000,000.

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income represents net income plus the change in equity of a business enterprise resulting from transactions and circumstances from non-owner sources. The Company’s comprehensive income was equal to net income for the periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

NOTE 3 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements

No. 2012-02, July 2012, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): In accordance with the amendments in this update, an entity has the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, an entity concludes that it is not more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, then the entity is not required to take further action. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value with the carrying amount in accordance with Subtopic 350-30.

No. 2012-06, October 2012, Business Combinations (Topic 805): When a reporting entity recognizes an indemnification asset (in accordance with Subtopic 805-20) as a result of a government-assisted acquisition of a financial institution and subsequently a change in the cash flows expected to be collected on the indemnification asset occurs (as a result of a change in cash flows expected to be collected on the assets subject to indemnification), the reporting entity should subsequently account for the change in the measurement of the indemnification asset on the same basis as the change in the assets subject to indemnification. Any amortization of changes in value should be limited to the contractual term of the indemnification agreement (that is, the lesser of the term of the indemnification agreement and the remaining life of the indemnified assets).

No. 2013-01, January 2013, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): The amendments in this Update affect entities that have derivatives accounted for in accordance with Topic 815, including bifurcated embedded derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45 or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. Entities with other types of financial assets and financial liabilities subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement also are affected because these amendments make them no longer subject to the disclosure requirements in Update 2011-11.

NOTE 4 - Contracts Receivable

Contracts Receivable consist of at:

	June 30,
	2014			2013
Billed
Completed Contracts	$	2,463,729		$	1,515,691
Contracts in Progress		727,790			779,137
Retained		782,750			625,300
Allowance for Bad Debts		(201,000	)		(201,000	)
TOTAL	$	3,773,269		$	2,719,128

NOTE 5 - Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment and related accumulated depreciation consist of the following:

	June 30,
	2014			2013
Machinery and Equipment	$	3,729,922		$	4,796,332
Office furniture and Equipment		169,255			82,467
Transportation and Earth moving Equipment		8,671,000			7,054,405
Leasehold Improvements		25,500			24,000
Property, Plant and Equipment Gross		12,595,677			11,957,204
Less: Accumulated Depreciation		(10,349,583	)		(9,803,537	)
Property, Plant and Equipment Net	$	2,246,094		$	2,153,667

Depreciation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $276,667 and $293,703, respectively.

NOTE 6 - Costs and Estimated Earnings on Contracts

For the six months ended June 30, 2014:

	Revenues Earned		Cost of Revenues		Gross Profit (Loss)

Revenue on completed contracts	$	5,711,986	$	3,851,114	$	1,860,872
Revenue on uncompleted contracts		2,781,453		2,662,761		118,692
Total for 6 months ended June 30, 2014	$	8,493,439	$	6,513,875	$	1,979,564

	as of June 30, 2014:
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts	$	4,657,779
Estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts		945,590
Revenues earned on uncompleted contracts		5,603,369
Billings to date		5,194,537
Total Net Amount	$	408,832

Amount shown as cost and estimated earnings in excess
of billings on uncompleted contracts	$	696,449
Amount shown as billings in excess of costs and
estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts		(287,617	)

Total Net Amount	$	408,832

For the six months ended June 30, 2013:
	Revenues Earned		Cost of Revenues		Gross Profit (Loss)
Revenue on completed contracts	$	5,208,906	$	4,065,375	$	1,143,531
Revenue on uncompleted contracts		1,559,580		1,261,078		298,502
Total for 6 months ended June 30, 2013	$	6,768,486	$	5,326,453	$	1,442,033

	as of June 30, 2013:
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts	$	3,003,247
Estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts		1,300,898
Revenues earned on uncompleted contracts		4,304,145
Billings to date		3,965,854
Total Net Amount	$	338,291
Amount shown as cost and estimated earnings in excess
of billings on uncompleted contracts	$	749,539
Amount shown as billings in excess of costs and
estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts		(411,248	)
Total Net Amount	$	338,291

NOTE 7 – Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following at June 30, 2014 and 2013:

	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
Line of credit, Florida Traditions Bank, Dade City, FL variable interest of 1.25% over prime, current rate 3.25%, secured by land, improvements, and accounts receivable. Line of credit matures April 30, 2015.	$	1,750,300		$	-
Installment loan from shareholder, Clyde Biston. Payable in monthly payments of $23,994, interest rate of 6.15%.		2,780,663			234,513
Line of credit, Florida Traditions Bank, Dade City, FL, variable interest of 1.25% over prime, year-end rate 3.25%, secured by land, improvements, and accounts receivable. Line of credit closed out April 30, 2014.		-			3,183,486
Various installment loans payable in monthly payments, interest rates ranging from 0% to 9.5%, secured by various equipment, vehicles, and property.		1,158,178			987,818
Total		5,689,141			4,405,817
Less: Current portion		(2,416,856	)		(418,912	)
Long-Term debt, less current portion	$	3,272,285		$	3,986,905

NOTE 8 – Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

Principal payments on long-term debt are due as follows:

2014		$	2,416,856
2015			505,558
2016			449,022
2017			369,796
2018	+		1,947,909
		$	5,689,141

Contingencies

None.

NOTE 9 - Earnings per Share

	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013

Net Income	$	(437,102	)	$	(363,602	)
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
Basic:		46,686,500			160

Weighted-average common stock
Equivalents		-			-
Stock Options		-			-
Warrants		-			-
Convertible Notes		-			-

Weighted-average common shares outstanding
Diluted		46,686,500			160

Earnings/(loss) per shares outstanding
Basic and Diluted	$	(0.0094	)	$	(2,272.51	)

NOTE 10 - Operating Lease Agreements

In the past, the Company rented certain equipment /office space under month to month operating lease agreements. Lease expenses incurred as of June 30, 2014 and 2013 under such agreements were $194,620 and $42,030, respectively.

NOTE 11 - Related Party Transactions

For the purposes of these financial statements, parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the other party in making financial or operational decisions. In considering each possible related party relationship, attention is directed to the substance of the relationship, not merely the legal form.

Related parties may enter into transactions which unrelated parties might not, and transactions between related parties may not be effected on the same terms, conditions and amounts as transactions between unrelated parties. Our President and CEO owns a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock, meaning he can exert significant influence over corporate decisions and strategy. Related party transactions for the period include the following:

Leased Facilities

The Company operates out of facilities owned by the majority shareholder of the Company. From June, 1995, until October 31, 2013, the Company was allowed to use the facilities rent-free. As of November 1, 2013 the Company entered into a lease agreement with the shareholder for use of the facilities. Rental expenses incurred for the six months ended June 30, 2014 under the lease agreement were $144,195.

NOTE 12 - 401K Salary Deferral Plan

The Company has established a deferred benefit plan for office and managerial staff with one year or more of service. The plan allows employees to contribute through salary withholding. The Company may match the contribution up to 3% of the gross wages of the employee. Amounts contributed by the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are $0 and $0, respectively.

NOTE 13 – Uncertain Tax Positions

Management of the Company considers the likelihood of changes by tax authorities in its filed income tax returns and recognizes a liability for or discloses potential significant changes that management believes are more likely than not to occur upon examination by tax authorities. Management has not identified any uncertain tax positions in filed income tax returns that require recognition or disclosure in the accompanying financial statements. The Company’s income tax returns for the past three years are subject to examination by tax authorities, and may change upon examination.

NOTE 14 – Reverse Acquisition

On November 1, 2013 Cross Environmental Services, Inc. (CES) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement), with CES Acquisitions, Inc. (Subsidiary), and CES Synergies, Inc. (the Merger). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Subsidiary merged into CES, such that CES became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the Merger), and the Company issued 35,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to the shareholders of CES (the Acquisition Shares), representing approximately 75.2% of the Company’s aggregate issued and outstanding common stock following the closing of the Merger Agreement. The share exchange is being accounted for as a recapitalization, and not as a business combination under the scope of FASB ASC Topic 805. CES is the acquirer for accounting purposes and CES Synergies, Inc. is the acquired company. Accordingly, CES’s sub-S corporate status was terminated at this date.

NOTE 15 – Subsequent Events

The Company has performed an evaluation of subsequent events through the date the accompanying financial statements were issued and did not identify any material subsequent transactions that require disclosure.

NOTE 16 - Segment Information

The accounting standards for reporting information about operating segments define operating segments as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer. The Company is organized by line of business. While the Chief Executive Officer evaluates results in a number of different ways, the line of business management structure is the primary basis for which the allocation of resources and financial results are assessed. Under the aforementioned criteria, the Company operates in three operating and reporting segments: remediation, demolition and insulation.

Cross Remediation is one segment of the Company that derives its income from mold remediation and abatement services for a broad range of environments. Cross Demolition offers full scale commercial demolition and wrecking down to interior and selective demolition and strip down services. Our third segment, Cross Insulation, derives its revenue from re-insulation and insulation of new and remodeling projects.

The information provided below is obtained from internal information that is provided to the Company’s chief operating decision maker for the purpose of corporate management. The Company uses operating income (loss) to measure segment performance as recorded below:

For the six months ended,

	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
Remediation Segment
Revenue	$	2,802,351		$	3,059,662
Cost of Revenues		2,030,704			2,377,944
Gross Profit		771,647			681,718

General & Administrative expense		667,934			603,008
Allocated CES Admin. Expenses		393,167			333,014
Other (Income)/Expense		3,343			(2,524	)
Net Income from Segment	$	(292,797	)	$	(251,780	)

	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
Demolition Segment
Revenue	$	5,449,460		$	3,339,784
Cost of Revenues		4,401,713			2,659,660
Gross Profit		1,047,747			680,124

General & Administrative expense		383,501			414,311
Allocated CES Admin. Expenses		764,555			363,501
Other (Income)/Expense		13,854			9,308
Net Income from Segment	$	(114,163	)	$	(106,996	)

	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
Insulation Segment
Revenue	$	298,380		$	363,566
Cost of Revenues		242,232			293,679
Gross Profit		56,148			69,887

General & Administrative expense		44,691			36,281
Allocated CES Admin. Expenses		41,862			39,570
Other (Income)/Expense		(263	)		(1,139	)
Net Income from Segment	$	(30,142	)	$	(4,825	)

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Forward-Looking Statements and Associated Risks.

This section and other parts of this Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements Forward-looking statements provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact. Forward-looking statements also can be identified by words such as “future,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “can,” “may,” and similar terms. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and the Company’s actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2014 (the “2013 Form 10-K”) under the heading “Risk Factors”.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the 2013 Form 10-K and the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. All information presented herein is based on the Company’s fiscal calendar. Unless otherwise stated, references in this report to particular years, quarters, months or periods refer to the Company’s fiscal years ended in December and the associated quarters, months, or periods of those fiscal years. Each of the terms the “Company” “we”, “us” or “our” as used herein refers collectively to CES Synergies, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, unless otherwise stated. The Company assumes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason, except as required by law.

Overview and Highlights

CES Synergies, Inc. is a Nevada corporation formed on April 26, 2010. The Company is the parent company of Cross Environmental Services, Inc. (“CES”), which was incorporated in 1988 in the state of Florida. The Company acquired CES in a reverse merger transaction that closed on November 1, 2013, and CES is deemed the accounting acquirer under accounting rules.

The Company is an asbestos and lead abatement contracting firm specializing in the removal of asbestos and lead from buildings and other structures, and demolition of structures. The Company’s services include removal of asbestos and lead, construction, installation, and repair of ceilings and insulation systems and demolition. Most jobs are located within the state of Florida, but the Company accepts and perform jobs throughout the southeastern United States.

The Company provides asbestos abatement and removal, demolition, and mold remediation services primarily in the USA. The services we provide include the removal of asbestos, lead and other hazardous materials from structures ranging from residences to commercial and industrial applications, including secure defense contractor facilities, colleges, hospitals, and mid-rise and high-rise buildings and residential structures. The Company provides demolition and wrecking services, including the removal of storage tanks; mechanical insulation; duct/mold and indoor air quality services; land clearing; and on-site crushing and recycling. In the public sector, our customers include city, state, and federal agencies. Our private-sector customers include general contractors, developers, project owners, and industrial and commercial clients.

We report results under ASC 280, Segment Reporting, for three segments: remediation, demolition and insulation. Remediation derives its income from mold remediation and abatement services for a broad range of environments. Demolition offers full scale commercial demolition and wrecking down to interior and selective demolition and strip down services. Insulation derives its revenue from re-insulation and insulation of new and remodeling projects. After careful analysis of our operations following the business slowdown in 2011, management made the decision to scale down the less profitable demolition division and refocus efforts on more profitable businesses in asbestos, mold, and lead remediation, and interior demolition. We will continue to provide demolition services where they are a natural spinoff of our other work. The decision created an excess of machinery and heavy equipment that was not being used, which we sold in 2012.

Service Contracts

For our asbestos abatement, demolition, and mold remediation contracts, we typically agree to provide all labor, supervision, material and equipment required to perform hazardous material abatement and disposal work as required. Our interior demolition and certain exterior demolition contracts do not contain “hazardous material abatement” provisions. Our demolition contracts generally require us to provide all labor, supervision, material and equipment required for demolition and clearance on specified properties.

We operate primarily through a bid submission and award process to various public and government entities. Bids specify terms and conditions of contracting. We do not write our contracts. Our customers dictate contract language, payment terms, and in most cases the timing of and forms used for billing. When we bid on a project we agree to these terms which are included in the bid specifications. Since our inception in 1988, we have not been required to make any penalty payments to our customers or incurred post-contractual costs under contractual commitments. Many of our equipment supply, local design, and installation subcontracts contain provisions that enable us to seek recourse against our vendors or subcontractors if there is a deficiency in their commitments.

Payments to us by the federal government are based on the services provided and the products installed, calculated in accordance with federal regulatory guidelines and the specific contract’s terms.

To mitigate contractual performance risks, we have created and invested in processes and systems to ensure that our project managers bid in compliance with project specifications, perform site inspections, and participate in pre-bid meetings. Our bidding process takes into account a specified list of variables, which we have developed and fine-tuned over 25 years of doing business, to ensure that we achieve our performance and financial goals for each contract. Project managers are trained in our bidding process, and bids greater than $200,000 are reviewed and approved by a senior management team before submission.

Tracking of job costs to manage financial risk is paramount at the Company. Through a company-developed cost accounting system, jobs are tracked not only by phase (i.e. type of work) but also according to fifteen separate job cost codes that the Company has identified as essential for effective project management. These cost codes are mapped to our bidding system, thereby allowing us to track the financial performance of all contract phases and to ensure that potential cost overruns can be identified and mitigated.

Job costing is fully integrated between all modules of our accounting system, which include accounts payable, accounts receivable, payroll, and inventory. Direct job costs include: labor (not drivers), driver labor, materials, subcontractors, labor service, job site costs (i.e. permits, rental equipment), dump fees (landfill), travel expenses, temporary lodgings, jobsite fuel, bonding costs, inspection fees (DEP, etc.), testing/lab fees, workers compensation (by worker comp classification), and indirect costs (which include costs indirectly incurred such as vehicle insurance, repairs and maintenance, fuel and oil).

We review job costs twice each month while contracts are in progress, and calculate and review final job cost at the completion of each job. Problems are reviewed at weekly meetings. Project managers regularly check on their jobs to monitor progress and man-hours.

To maintain control of contract bids and implementation, senior management holds weekly reviews with project managers, covering job bidding, job awards, upcoming bids and contracts, etc. Regular accounts receivable and collections reviews are also held as part of the management process.

Effects of Seasonality and Economic Uncertainty

We may be subject to seasonal fluctuations and construction cycles, at educational institutions, where large projects are typically carried out during summer months when their facilities are unoccupied. Government customers, many of which have fiscal years that do not coincide with ours, typically follow annual procurement cycles and appropriate funds on a fiscal-year basis even though contract performance may take more than one year. Further, government contracting cycles can be affected by the timing of, and delays in, the legislative process related to government programs and incentives that help drive demand for energy efficiency and renewable energy projects. As a result, our revenue and operating income in the third quarter are typically higher, and our revenue and operating income in the first quarter are typically lower, than in other quarters of the year. As a result of such fluctuations, we may occasionally experience declines in revenue or earnings as compared to the immediately preceding quarter, and comparisons of our operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful.

To manage uncertainties created by business seasonality, we have implemented business processes to give us flexibility to manage overhead and job costs. Those processes allow us to determine when it is most cost effective to use company-owned assets or to contract out aspects of a project. For example, when the Company was awarded a sizeable post-Hurricane Katrina demolition contract in Louisiana, the processes led it to develop relationships with local subcontractors under Company management and supervision to perform the demolition work rather than moving Company heavy equipment and personnel to Louisiana, thereby preserving margins on the contract.

During the recession that started in 2008, the number of projects available to the Company in Florida fell. To allow the Company to maintain cash reserves necessary to execute the Louisiana contract, management agreed to a 10% reduction in salaries, and did so for a full year, until finances righted themselves in late 2009. No field supervisors or workers were laid off during this period. CES retained its skilled workforce, allowing the contracts in Louisiana to return a 41% gross profit.

Backlog and Awarded Projects

Our sales cycle begins with the initial contact with the customer and ends, when successful, with a signed contract, also referred to as fully-contracted backlog. Historically, our sales cycle typically has averaged 30 days. Awarded backlog is created when a potential customer awards a project to us following a request for proposal. Once a project is awarded but not yet contracted, we typically conduct a detailed review to determine the scope of the project. At this point, we also determine the sub-contractor, and what equipment will be used. Historically, awarded projects typically have taken 45 days to result in a signed contract and thus convert to fully-contracted backlog. This process may take longer, however, depending upon the size and complexity of the project. Further, at times in the past we have experienced periods during which the portion of the sales cycle for converting awarded project to signed contracts has lengthened. Recently, we have been experiencing an unusually sustained lengthening of conversion times. Continued U.S. federal fiscal uncertainty not only has contributed to a lengthening of our sales cycle for U.S. federal projects, but also has adversely affected both municipal and commercial customers across most geographic regions. We have observed among our existing and prospective customer base increased scrutiny of decisions about spending and about incurring debt to finance projects. For example, we have observed increased use of outside consultants and advisors, as well as adoption of additional approval steps, by many of our customers, which has resulted in a lengthening of the sales cycle. We expect this trend to continue in 2014. After the customer agrees to the terms of the contract and the contract is executed, the project moves to fully-contracted backlog. The contracts reflected in our fully-contracted backlog typically have a construction period of 30-45days and we typically expect to recognize revenue for such contracts over the same period. Fully-contracted backlog begins converting into revenue generated from backlog on a percentage-of-completion basis once construction has commenced.

Financial Operations Overview

Revenue

We derive revenue from the provision of asbestos abatement, demolition, and mold remediation services to city, state, and federal agencies. We also sell services to general contractors, developers, project owners, and industrial and commercial clients. Much of our work has been founded on the removal of hazardous materials from structures ranging from residences to commercial and industrial applications.

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014, Hunt Construction, the general contractor for the Company’s Southeastern University project, accounted for 11% of revenues. For the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Florida Department of Transportation and the Louisiana Land Trust both accounted for 10% or more of revenue.

Direct Expenses and Gross Margin

Direct expenses include the cost of labor, materials, equipment, subcontracting and outside engineering that are required for the execution our contracts, as well as preconstruction costs, sales incentives, associated travel, inventory obsolescence charges, and amortization of intangible assets related to customer contracts. A majority of our contracts have fixed price terms; however, in some cases we negotiate protections, such as a cost-plus structure, to mitigate the risk of rising prices for materials, services and equipment.

Gross margin, which is gross profit as a percent of revenue, is affected by a number of factors, including the type of services performed and the geographic region in which the sale is made. Geographic location impacts the cost of disposal, lodging, and fuel. We sometimes find ourselves bidding against local contractors. In these instances, we may be willing to accept a lower profit margin in order to establish ourselves with a new client, or in a new geographic location.

Rising fuel costs affect us in several ways. Fuel in our trucks and equipment has an immediate cost impact. Increases in petroleum prices increase the costs for remediation due because petroleum products are used to make all poly, bags, etc. that we use for contaminated materials containment.

In addition, gross margin frequently varies across the period of a project. Our expected gross margin on, and expected revenue for, a project are based on budgeted costs. From time to time, a portion of the contingencies reflected in budgeted costs are not incurred due to strong execution performance. In that case, and generally at project completion, we recognize revenue for which there is no further corresponding direct expense. As a result, gross margin tends to be back-loaded for projects with strong execution performance; this explains the gross margin improvement that occurs from time to time at project closeout. We refer to this gross margin improvement at the time of project completion as a project closeout.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses consist of salaries and benefits, project development costs, and general, administrative and other expenses.

Salaries and benefits. Salaries and benefits consist primarily of expenses for personnel not directly engaged in specific revenue generating activity. These expenses include the time of executive management, legal, finance, accounting, human resources, information technology and other staff not utilized in a particular project. We employ a comprehensive time card system which creates a contemporaneous record of the actual time by employees on project activity.

Project development costs. Project development costs consist primarily of sales, engineering, legal, finance and third-party expenses directly related to the development of a specific customer opportunity. This also includes associated travel and marketing expenses.

General, administrative and other expenses. These expenses consist primarily of rents and occupancy, professional services, insurance, unallocated travel expenses, telecommunications, and office expenses. Professional services consist principally of recruiting costs, external legal, audit, tax and other consulting services.

Other Expenses, Net

Other expenses, net consists primarily of interest income on cash balances, interest expense on borrowings, and gains and losses on the disposal of surplus assets. Interest expense will vary periodically depending on prevailing short-term interest rates.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and the Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and operating results require the Company’s management to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the amounts reported in its consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item I of this Form 10-Q describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities.

We have identified the policies below as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations. The Company’s senior management has reviewed these critical accounting policies and related disclosures with the Company’s Board of Directors. The impact and any associated risks related to these policies on our business operations are discussed throughout this section where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results. Our preparation of financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates and such differences may be material.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid debt instruments and other short-term investments with maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Contracts Receivable

Contracts receivable are stated at the amounts management expects to collect from outstanding balances. Management provides for probable uncollectible amounts through a charge to earnings and a credit to a valuation allowance based on its assessment of the current status of individual accounts. Balances outstanding after management has used reasonable collection efforts are written off through a charge to the valuation allowance and a credit to trade contracts receivable. Management has determined that an allowance of $201,000 for doubtful accounts at June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013 is required.

Contracts receivable will generally be due within 30 to 45 days and collateral is not required.

Cost and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts

The asset, "Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts," represents revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed.

The liability, "Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts," represents billings in excess of revenues recognized.

Recoverability of Long-Lived Assets

We review the recoverability of long-lived assets on a periodic basis whenever events and changes in circumstances have occurred which may indicate a possible impairment. The assessment for potential impairment is based primarily on our ability to recover the carrying value of our long-lived assets from expected future cash flows from our operations on an undiscounted basis. If such assets are determined to be impaired, the impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Fixed assets to be disposed of by sale are carried at the lower of the then current carrying value or fair value less estimated costs to sell.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amount reported in the balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, contracts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. We do not utilize derivative instruments.

Revenue and Cost Recognition

The Company recognizes revenues from fixed-price and modified fixed-price construction contracts on the percentage-of-completion method, measured by the percentage of cost incurred to date to estimated total cost for each contract. This method is used because management considers total cost to be the best available measure of progress on the contracts.

Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts, if any, are made in the period in which such losses are determined. Changes in job performance, job conditions, and estimated profitability may result in revisions to costs and income, which are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined.

The asset, "Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts," represents revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed.

The liability, "Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts," represents billings in excess of revenues recognized.

Contract retentions are included in contract receivables.

Net Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock

The basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the “as if converted” basis.

Uncertainty in Income Taxes

Management considers the likelihood of changes by taxing authorities in its filed income tax returns and recognizes a liability for or discloses potential changes that management believes are more likely than not to occur upon examination by tax authorities. Management has not identified any uncertain tax positions in filed income tax returns or this merger that require recognition or disclosure. The Company’s income tax returns for the past three years are subject to examination by tax authorities, and may change upon examination.

We follow ASC 740-10, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“ASC 740-10”). This interpretation requires recognition and measurement of uncertain income tax positions using a “more-likely-than-not” approach. ASC 740-10 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Management has adopted ASC 740-10 and they evaluate their tax positions on an annual basis.

Prior to November 1, 2013 CES had elected by unanimous consent of its shareholders to be taxed under the provisions of subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code. Under those provisions, CES did not pay federal or state corporate income taxes on its taxable income. Instead, the stockholders were liable for individual federal income taxes on their respective shares of the Company's taxable income. Since November 1, 2013, the Company is responsible for paying corporate income tax. The Company did not make a profit in the six months ended June 30, 2014, and therefore, no provision or liability for Federal income taxes is included on these financial statements.

Advertising (in thousands, except percentages)

Advertising costs are expensed when incurred. Advertising costs for the quarters ending June 30, 2014 and 2013 were $1.6 and $0.6, respectively. Historically, the Company has not relied on advertising and marketing to generate business. In the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company hired a marketing/sales manager to expand its marketing activities.

Results of Operations (in thousands, except percentages)

Quarter Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Quarter Ended June 30, 2013

Net sales grew 39% or $1,312 during the quarter ended June 30, 2014 compared to June 30, 2013. Revenues in the Demolition segment increased by $1,450 or 95%. The Remediation and Insulation segments both experienced declines in sales in the quarter ($103 and $35 respectively). The increase in Demolition, the largest Company segment, was primarily attributable to revenues from the Company’s contract for Southeastern University in Lakeland, FL. Remediation division sales typically fluctuate from year to year. The decline in the Insulation segment was due primarily to lower maintenance spending by a large supermarket chain in the southeastern United States.

Management believes that the Company can continue to grow revenues by expanding into new geographic areas in the south and eastern USA. During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Company hired three new sales staff to support its growth plans. Those persons are located in Florida and Louisiana. In the second quarter all of the salesmen brought in new business that is either underway or awarded in the quarter.

In the second quarter of 2014, approximately $1,000 of revenues were derived from contracts in Louisiana ($350 in 2013). Revenues were more heavily concentrated in Florida in the second quarter of 2014 as a result of new contract wins in the state, including demolition contracts in Silver Springs (valued at $431) and with the Florida Department of Transportation ($379), and remediation contracts at the Daytona Speedway ($1,100), the Federal Courthouse in Jacksonville ($376), and Hill Middle School ($367). The Daytona contract will also have a significant scrap revenue stream that will cover a portion of our funding of startup costs for the contract.

New contract awards in the second quarter of 2014 included remediation contracts for the Rivarde Juvenile Detention Center in Louisiana and Daytona International Speedway in Florida, and demolition contracts for Louisiana Land Trust and Jackson Barracks in Louisiana.

Sales Data

The following table shows net sales by operating segment and net sales by service during the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except percentages):

	2014		Change			2013
Net Sales by Operating Segment:
Remediation	$	1,559		-6	%	$	1,662
Demolition		2,974		95	%		1,524
Insulation		148		-19	%		183

Total net sales	$	4,681		39	%	$	3,369

Segment Operating Performance (in thousands, except percentages)

The Company manages its business on a functional basis. Accordingly, the Company determined its reportable operating segments, which are generally based on the types of services it provides, to be Remediation, Demolition and Insulation. Remediation derives its income from mold remediation and abatement services for a broad range of environments. Demolition offers full scale commercial demolition and wrecking. Insulation derives its revenue from re-insulation and insulation of new and remodeling projects.

Further information regarding the Company’s operating segments may be found in Note 16, “Segment Information.”

Remediation

Remediation services comprise asbestos abatement, lead removal, mold remediation, indoor air quality/duct cleaning, and removal of: contaminated soil, animal waste removal, manual selective and complete interior demolition including removal of floor covering, and adhesive removal. These services are primarily performed for commercial, retail, governmental, industrial, military, public and private schools.

The following table presents Remediation net sales information for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (dollars in thousands):

	2014			Change		2013
Net sales	$	1,559		$	(103)	$	1,662
Percentage of total net sales		33	%		(16%)		49	%

The decrease in the Remediation segment net sales during the quarter ended June 30, 2014 was caused by typical business fluctuations. Volatility in revenues arises because contracts are of a short duration (typically a month or less). Remediation is usually the first activity performed in a contract and therefore the first part to be completed. In larger projects it is not unusual to perform work in stages over the course of several months. The average size and number of projects in the segment in the first quarter of 2013 were greater than in the corresponding quarter of 2014. The Company has no control over the amount of work available to bid from year to year. It is the nature of the Remediation business to have these highs and lows.

Demolition

Demolition services comprise partial, phased and complete demolition of commercial, retail, private, governmental, industrial, military, public and private schools. Demolition activities include, building separations, concrete breaking and saw-cutting, using the Company’s own man-lifts, bobcats, roll-off containers and roll-off trucks for hauling and disposal of construction debris. The Company focuses on asbestos, mold and lead remediation, and interior demolition. The Company also provides full-scale commercial demolition and wrecking, as well as underground and above ground storage tank removal, and full-scale site clearing including underground pipe removal and installation.

Hurricanes and natural disasters are the biggest factor in the creation of large scale demolition opportunities for the Company. As a result, the work is unpredictable. Demolition contracts range widely in price from $30 to $20,000. Demolition contracts last anywhere from two weeks (to demolish a one-story masonry commercial building such as a home improvement store) to two years or more to demolish concrete slabs left by a hurricane such as Katrina.

The following table presents Demolition net sales information for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except percentages):

	2014			Change		2013
Net sales	$	2,974		$	1,450	$	1,524
Percentage of total net sales		64	%		19%		45	%

The increase in net sales for the Demolition segment during the quarter ended June 30, 2014 was caused by the additional revenue from two major contracts: the Southeastern University project, and a contract with the City of Mulberry in Florida for improvements to its water system. Second quarter 2014 revenue from these two projects was $161.

Insulation

Our Insulation segment derives its revenue from re-insulation and insulation of new and remodeling projects. The segment typically does not experience large changes in revenues year over year. The amount of sales is typically driven by the amount of remodeling or maintenance work required by a large supermarket chain, with which the Company has a three-year contract that typically renews upon review at the end of each term.

The following table presents Insulation net sales information for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except percentages):

	2014			Change		2013
Net sales	$	148		$	35	$	183
Percentage of total net sales		3	%		(2%)		5	%

The decrease in the Insulation segment net sales between the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was caused primarily by a reduction in work provided to the aforementioned supermarket chain.

Gross Margin

Gross margin for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are as follows (in thousands, except gross margin percentages):

	2014			2013
Net sales	$	4,681		$	3,369
Cost of sales		3,384			2,823

Gross margin	$	1,297		$	546

Gross margin percentage		28	%		16	%

The gross margin percentage in the quarter ended June 30, 2014 was 28% compared to 16% in the quarter ended June 30, 2013. The improvement in year-over-year gross margins was caused by decreased use of subcontractors, lower job site and other indirect costs, and decreases in dump fees and fuel costs. We believe our profit margin will continue to increase as we continue to be able to bid these larger projects with an increased margin due to fewer bidders being qualified to bid these types of jobs.

The Company anticipates that gross margin during the balance of 2014 will be between 23% and 26%. In general, gross margins and margins on services will remain under pressure due to a variety of factors, including continued industry-wide pricing pressures and increased competition. In response to competitive pressures, the Company may have to take service pricing actions, which could adversely affect gross margins. Gross margins could also be affected by the Company’s ability to manage costs effectively and to stimulate demand for certain of its products. To counteract the pressure on margins, the Company is working to improve its budget management processes for contracts, in particular to improve its ability to track and charge for change orders as they occur. The Company may also decline to bid on contracts where gross margins fall below acceptable levels.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are as follows (in thousands, except for percentages):

	2014			Change		2013
General and administrative	$	1,265		$	358	$	907
Percentage of total net sales		27	%				27	%

General and Administrative (“G&A”) Expense

The growth in G&A during the quarter ended June 30, 2014 was caused by a number of factors, including increases in compensation costs (increased by $186), higher rents associated with the leases of the Company’s headquarter building in Crystal Springs FL, a building in Zephyrhills FL and an office in Miami FL (increased by $80), and higher loan costs associated with an increase in borrowings ($55).

Compensation cost increases occurred as a result of the hire of new sales staff, recruited in anticipation of expansion of sales efforts into new states (increased by $64), an increase in office salaries ($47) resulting from the hire of an internal IT Manager and in-house legal counsel, and an increase in officers’ salaries ($62; since the Company restructured itself as a public company, the CEO no longer receives compensation through regular dividends).

Rent expenses increased as the Company paid rent on its headquarter building in Crystal Springs FL, which is owned by the CEO. Prior to becoming a public company, the Company received use of the building at no cost from the CEO. The Company also leased new premises in Zephyrhills, FL in anticipation of needing more space for its plans to expand its marketing and bidding activities.

Having in-house counsel allows the Company to improve the efficiency of contract reviews and negotiations With a stronger legal presence, we also are able to successfully collect or litigate receivables in a more timely manner when needed.

Our IT department has installed our new servers and all offices are now connected remotely. We now routinely have video conferencing, which eliminates travel to the home office- saving time and gas. Additionally, project managers now have tablets for their work in the field, which has improved the effectiveness of walk-through and preconstruction visits. Pictures and plans can be downloaded from the field to our servers for instant access by anyone who needs to review them, prepare bids, etc.

Other Income and Expense

Other income and expense for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are as follows (in thousands, except percentages):

	2014			Change		2013
Other Income(Expenses)	$	143		$	169	$	(26)
Interest expense		(66	)		24		(42	)
Total other income/(expense), net	$	77			145	$	(68	)

The year-over-year increase in other income during the quarter ended June 30, 2014 was due primarily to a state mandated excess profit insurance refund ($142), offset by increased interest expense resulting from the Company’s higher debt balance.

Provision for Income Taxes

Prior to November 1 2013, CES elected to be taxed under the provisions of subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code. Under those provisions, during and prior to 2013, CES did not pay federal or state corporate income taxes on its taxable income. Instead, the stockholders were liable for individual federal income taxes on their respective shares of the Company's taxable income. Therefore, no provision or liability for Federal income taxes was included in 2013 financial reports.

Provision for income taxes and effective tax rates for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2014		June 30, 2013
Provision for income taxes	$	-	$	-
Effective tax rate		0%		-

The Company’s effective tax rates for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 was nil because of the losses carried forward from prior periods, which offset the profit recorded by the Company in the quarter.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2013(in thousands, except percentages)

Net sales grew 26% or $1,725 during the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to June 30, 2013. Revenues in the Demolition segment increased by $2,182 or 67%. The Remediation and Insulation segments both experienced decreased net sales in the six months ($392 and $65 respectively). The increase in Demolition, the largest Company segment, was primarily attributable to revenues from the Company’s contract for Southeastern University in Lakeland, FL. Remediation division sales typically fluctuate from year to year. The decline in the Insulation segment was due primarily to lower maintenance spending by a large supermarket chain in the southeastern United States.

Management believes that the Company can continue to grow revenues by expanding into new geographic areas in the south and eastern USA. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company hired three new sales staff to support its growth plans. Those persons are located in Florida and Louisiana. As mentioned above, they have been successful in winning new business in the first half of 2014 in both states. The Company is also looking at new opportunities in other states.

Sales Data

The following table shows net sales by operating segment and net sales by service during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except percentages):

	2014		Change			2013
Net Sales by Operating Segment:
Remediation	$	2,745		-13	%	$	3,137
Demolition		5,450		67	%		3,268
Insulation		298		-18	%		364

Total net sales	$	3,818		7	%	$	3,398

Segment Operating Performance (in thousands, except percentages)

The Company’s reportable operating segments are Remediation, Demolition and Insulation. Remediation derives its income from mold remediation and abatement services for a broad range of environments. Demolition offers full scale commercial demolition and wrecking. Insulation derives its revenue from re-insulation and insulation of new and remodeling projects.

Further information regarding the Company’s operating segments may be found in Note 16, “Segment Information.”

Remediation

The following table presents Remediation net sales information for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (dollars in thousands):

	2014			Change			2013
Net sales	$	2,745		$	(392	)	$	3,317
Percentage of total net sales		32	%		(14%)			46	%

The decrease in the Remediation segment net sales during the six months ended June 30, 2014 was caused by typical business fluctuations. Volatility in revenues arises because contracts are of a short duration (typically a month or less). The Company has no control over the amount of work available to bid from year to year. The average size and number of projects in the segment in the first six months of 2013 were greater than in the corresponding six months of 2014.

Demolition

The following table presents Demolition net sales information for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except percentages):

	2014			Change		2013
Net sales	$	5,450		$	2,182	$	3,268
Percentage of total net sales		64	%		16%		48	%

The increase in net sales for the Demolition segment during the six months ended June 30, 2014 was caused by the additional revenue from two major contracts: the Southeastern University project, and a contract with the City of Mulberry in Florida for improvements to its water system. Revenues during the first six months of 2014 from these two projects was $922.

Insulation

The following table presents Insulation net sales information for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except percentages):

	2014			Change		2013
Net sales	$	298		$	(65)	$	363
Percentage of total net sales		4	%		1%		5	%

The decrease in the Insulation segment net sales between the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was caused primarily by a reduction in remodeling or maintenance work provided to a large supermarket chain, with which the Company has a new contract for one year, with automatic renewals.

Gross Margin

Gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are as follows (in thousands, except gross margin percentages):

	2014			2013
Net sales	$	8,493		$	6,768
Cost of sales		6,514			5,326

Gross margin	$	1,980		$	1,442

Gross margin percentage		23	%		21	%

The improvement in year-over-year gross margins was caused by lower use of subcontractors, lower job site and other indirect costs, decreases in dump fees and fuel costs.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are as follows (in thousands, except for percentages):

	2014			Change		2013
General and administrative	$	2,441		$	739	$	1,702
Percentage of total net sales		29	%		3%		25	%

General and Administrative (“G&A”) Expense

The growth in G&A during the six months ended June 30, 2014 was caused by a number of factors, including increases in compensation costs (increased by $353), higher rents associated with the leases of the Company’s headquarter building in Crystal Springs, FL, a building in Zephyrhills, FL and an office in Miami, FL (increased by $153), higher group health care insurance costs (increased by $70), higher loan costs (increased by $55), and professional fees associated and stock compensation costs (increased by $102).

Compensation cost increases occurred as a result of the hire of new sales staff, recruited in anticipation of expansion of sales efforts into new states (increased by $132), higher office salaries (increased by $85 for a new IT Manager and in-house counsel), and an increase in officers’ salaries ($123; since the Company restructured itself as a public company, the CEO no longer receives compensation through regular dividends).

Rent expenses increased as the Company paid rent on its headquarter building in Crystal Springs FL, which is owned by the CEO. Prior to becoming a public company, the Company received use of the building a no cost from the CEO. The Company also leased new premises in Zephyrhills FL in anticipation of needing more space for its plans to expand its marketing and bidding activities.

Other Income and Expense

Other income and expense for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are as follows (in thousands, except percentages):

	2014			Change		2013
Other Income(Expenses)	$	(2	)	$	3	$	1
Interest expense		(50	)		14		(36	)
Total other income/(expense), net	$	(52	)		17	$	(35	)

The year-over-year increase in other income during the quarter ended June 30, 2014 was due primarily to a state-mandated insurance refund, offset by increased interest expense resulting from the Company’s higher debt balance.

Provision for Income Taxes

Provision for income taxes and effective tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2014		June 30, 2013
Provision for income taxes	$	-	$	-
Effective tax rate		0%		-

The Company’s effective tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was nil because of the losses carried forward from prior periods, which offset the profit recorded by the Company in the first half of 2014.

Liquidity and Capital Resources (in thousands, except percentages)

The Company believes its existing balances of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs, capital asset purchases, outstanding commitments, and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months. The Company will seek, however, to raise up to $5,000 in additional capital in 2014 to support its expansion plans.

The Company’s cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities were generally held in held in bank accounts.

The following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (in $ thousands):

	June 30		December 31,
	2014		2013
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities	$	73	$	250
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	2,102	$	2,161
Long-term debt	$	4,532	$	4,731
Working capital	$	2,163	$	2,825

The following table presents selected financial information and statistics about the Company’s sources and uses of cash during the first six months of 2014 and 2013 (in $ thousands):

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,			June 30,
	2014			2013
Cash generated by/ (used in) operating activities	$	(341	)	$	735
Cash used in investing activities	$	(362	)	$	(302	)
Cash generated by/ (used in) financing activities	$	767		$	35

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the cash used in operating activities of $(341) was a result of $(437) of net loss, non-cash adjustments to net income of $276 and a net change in operating assets and liabilities of $(180). The Company used $(362) of cash for investing activities during the six months, to purchase property and equipment. There were no disposals of equipment in the six months. Cash generated by financing activities during the six months ($767) came from the issuance of new debt ($5,206) and common stock ($282), some of which was used to repay debt ($4,721). No distributions were paid in the first six months of 2014.

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, cash provided by operating activities of $735 was a result of a net loss of $(364), non-cash adjustments to net income of $294 and an increase in net change in operating assets and liabilities of $805. The Company used $(302) of cash for investing activities during the six months, to purchase property and equipment. There were no proceeds from disposals of equipment in 2013. Cash provided by financing activities during 2013 arose from the issuance of new debt ($692), some of which was used to repay debt ($223) and for distributions to shareholders ($435).

Capital Assets

The Company’s capital expenditures were $362 during the six months ended June 30, 2014, consisting of primarily of purchases of transportation and earth moving equipment, and computer and communications equipment.

The transportation and earth moving equipment is being used to replace ageing vans used in the remediation division, and to purchase mini excavators being utilized both in Silver Springs (Demolition) and Daytona Speedway (Remediation).

The computer and communications equipment was acquired to improve inter-office communications, thereby reducing travel costs, and to improve contract bidding and marketing capabilities.

The Company plans to raise up to $5,000 in new capital for capital expenditures in 2014, a portion of which will be used to renovate office space in Zephyrhills, and to open another satellite office in the south.

Long-Term Debt (in thousands, except percentages)

To date the Company has financed its operations through internally generated revenue from operations, the sale of common stock, the issuance of notes, and loans from shareholders. The following debt was outstanding at June 30, 2014:

(i) Installment loan from shareholder, Clyde Biston, with a monthly payment of $24, bearing annual interest at 6.15%. At June 30, 2014, $2,781 was outstanding under the loan. In the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company repaid $19 of principal under the loan.

(ii) A line of credit from Florida Traditions Bank, Dade City, FL, bearing variable interest of 1.25% over prime, secured by land, improvements, and accounts receivable. The line of credit matures on April 30, 2015. At June 30, 2014, $1,750 was outstanding under the line. In the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company made no repayments of principal under the line, and borrowed no additional principal.

(iii) Various installment loans payable in payments, with interest rates ranging from 0% to 9.5%, secured by various equipment, and property. At June 30, 2014, $1,158 was outstanding under the loans. In the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company repaid $121 of principal under the loans.

At June 30, 2014, a total of $5,689 was outstanding under all loans and the line of credit. $2,417 of that amount is due and payable in the 12 months following that date.

Dividend Program

As a privately-owned company prior to November 1, 2013, CES was owned by Clyde Biston. Mr. Biston elected to receive part of his compensation in the form of distributions paid to himself as the sole shareholder. The distributions made to Mr. Biston are summarized in the following table (in thousands):

	Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2014		June 30, 2013
Cash dividends paid (sub S distribution in 2013)	$	-	$	435

The Company does not expect to pay any dividends or make any distributions to shareholders in 2014.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company does not have any off balance sheet arrangements.

Indemnification

The Company generally does not indemnify its customers against legal claims arising from services it provides. The Company has not been required to make any significant payments resulting from such services.

The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and executive officers. Under these agreements, the Company has agreed to indemnify such individuals to the fullest extent permitted by law against liabilities that arise by reason of their status as directors or officers and to advance expenses incurred by such individuals in connection with related legal proceedings. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount of payments the Company could be required to make under these agreements due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each claim. However, the Company maintains directors and officers liability insurance coverage to reduce its exposure to such obligations, and payments made under these agreements historically have not been material.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded as of the evaluation date that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the material information required to be included in our Securities and Exchange Commission reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms relating to our company, particularly during the period when this report was being prepared.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are not party to any material legal proceedings.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

On April 11, 2014 the Company sold and issued 25,000 shares of common stock at $2 per share.

On April 16, 2014 the Company sold and issued 50,000 shares of common stock at $2 per share.

On May 31, 2014 the Company sold and issued 37,500 shares of common stock at $2 per share.

On June 5, 2014 the Company issued 25,000 shares of common stock to a consultant for services.

In connection with the foregoing, the Company relied upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended for transactions not involving a public offering.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The following documents are filed as a part of this report or are incorporated by reference to previous filings, if so indicated:

EXHIBIT NUMBER		DESCRIPTION

31.1		Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)
31.2		Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)
32.1		Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
32.2		Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

EX-101.INS		XBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101.SCH		XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101.CAL		XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE
EX-101.DEF		XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE
EX-101.LAB		XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABELS LINKBASE
EX-101.PRE		XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

	CES Synergies, Inc.

Date: August 11, 2014	By:	/s/ Clyde A. Biston
		Clyde A. Biston
		Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: August 11, 2014	By:	/s/ Sharon Rosenbauer
		Sharon Rosenbauer
		Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

CES Synergies, Inc. - FORM 10-Q - August 11, 2014

Attached files

CES Synergies, Inc. Reports