Volcano Corp - FORM 10-Q - August 8, 2014

Attached files

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

Volcano Corp Reports

Also read

file	filename
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT - Volcano Corp	volc630201410-qexhibit321.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT - Volcano Corp	volc630201410-qexhibit322.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT - Volcano Corp	volc630201410-qexhibit311.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT - Volcano Corp	volc630201410-qexhibit312.htm
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Volcano Corp	Financial_Report.xls

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



þ	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 000-52045

Volcano Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware		33-0928885
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification Number)

3721 Valley Centre Drive, Suite 500 San Diego, CA		92130
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(800) 228-4728

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate the number of shares of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:



Class		Outstanding at August 4, 2014
Common stock, $0.001 par value		51,460,461

VOLCANO CORPORATION

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014

Index



	PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)	1
	a. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	1
	b. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	2
	c. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss	3
	d. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	4
	e. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	5
	f. Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	27
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	37
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	39
	PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	40
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	40
Item 6.	Exhibits	62
Signatures		64
Exhibit Index		65

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION



Item 1.	Financial Statements

VOLCANO CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)



	June 30,			December 31,
	2014			2013
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	56,182		$	107,159
Short-term available-for-sale investments	149,981			230,775
Accounts receivable, net	85,097			81,962
Inventories	72,170			60,970
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	24,960			28,525
Total current assets	388,390			509,391
Long-term available-for-sale investments	35,510			34,750
Property and equipment, net	122,471			118,094
Intangible assets, net	126,970			58,108
Goodwill	150,882			55,087
Other non-current assets	56,330			56,489
Total assets	$	880,553		$	831,919
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	13,207		$	19,137
Accrued compensation	28,277			26,918
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	29,979			28,453
Deferred revenues	11,119			10,652
Contingent consideration	14,450			3,750
Total current liabilities	97,032			88,910
Convertible senior notes	410,868			401,012
Other long-term debt	1,208			1,268
Deferred revenues	4,802			5,079
Contingent consideration, non-current portion	52,984			29,888
Other non-current liabilities	6,523			5,960
Total liabilities	573,417			532,117
Commitments and contingencies (Note 4)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, par value of $0.001; 10,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013	—			—
Common stock, par value of $0.001; 250,000 shares authorized at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013; 51,321 and 51,530 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively	51			52
Additional paid-in capital	437,098			420,234
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(2,995		)	(4,088		)
Accumulated deficit	(127,018		)	(116,396		)
Total stockholders’ equity	307,136			299,802
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	880,553		$	831,919

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

VOLCANO CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Revenues	$	102,605		$	101,344		$	197,133		$	194,575
Cost of revenues, excluding amortization of intangibles	37,711			36,039			72,794			69,166
Gross profit	64,894			65,305			124,339			125,409
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative	49,353			45,734			99,664			89,563
Research and development	13,700			17,954			27,657			33,605
Amortization of intangibles	1,818			820			3,601			1,654
Acquisition-related items	(6,441		)	911			(5,405		)	2,489
Restructuring (benefits) charges	(841		)	—			32			—
Total operating expenses	57,589			65,419			125,549			127,311
Operating income (loss)	7,305			(114		)	(1,210		)	(1,902		)
Interest income	281			305			596			643
Interest expense	(7,320		)	(6,607		)	(14,498		)	(13,152		)
Exchange rate (loss) gain	(13		)	(301		)	71			(1,079		)
Other, net	14			2,279			124			4,177
Income (loss) before income tax	267			(4,438		)	(14,917		)	(11,313		)
Income tax benefit	(15		)	(2,050		)	(4,295		)	(5,764		)
Net income (loss)	$	282		$	(2,388	)	$	(10,622	)	$	(5,549	)
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	0.01		$	(0.04	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.10	)
Diluted	$	0.01		$	(0.04	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.10	)
Shares used in calculating net income (loss) per share:
Basic	51,300			54,574			51,630			54,389
Diluted	51,674			54,574			51,630			54,389

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

VOLCANO CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Net income (loss)	$	282		$	(2,388	)	$	(10,622	)	$	(5,549	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income
Foreign currency translation adjustments	206			363			1,753			5
Changes in unrealized loss on available-for-sale investments, net of tax	(44		)	(169		)	(40		)	(194		)
Changes in unrealized (losses) gain on foreign currency forward exchange contracts, net of tax	(357		)	8			(620		)	8
Other comprehensive (loss) income	(195		)	202			1,093			(181		)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	87		$	(2,186	)	$	(9,529	)	$	(5,730	)

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

VOLCANO CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands)

(unaudited)



	Common Stock					Additional Paid-In Capital			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Accumulated Deficit			Total Stockholders’ Equity
	Shares		Amount			Additional Paid-In Capital			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Accumulated Deficit			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balance at December 31, 2013	51,530		$	52		$	420,234		$	(4,088	)	$	(116,396	)	$	299,802
Issuance of common stock under equity compensation plans	940		—			9,541			—			—			9,541
Employee stock-based compensation cost	—		—			7,616			—			—			7,616
Common stock repurchase/retirement	(1,149	)	(1		)	2			—			—			1
Tax expense related to stock-based compensation	—		—			(295		)	—			—			(295		)
Net loss	—		—			—			—			(10,622		)	(10,622		)
Other comprehensive income	—		—			—			1,093			—			1,093
Balance at June 30, 2014	51,321		$	51		$	437,098		$	(2,995	)	$	(127,018	)	$	307,136

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

VOLCANO CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013
Operating activities
Net loss	$	(10,622	)	$	(5,549	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	15,212			12,223
Amortization (accretion) of investment premium (discount), net	1,866			1,378
Accretion of debt discount on convertible senior notes and other long-term debt	9,881			9,341
Change in contingent consideration	(6,204		)	1,656
Non-cash stock compensation expense	7,515			7,847
Asset impairment related to restructuring	818			—
Gain on sale of other long-term investment	(365		)	(1,925		)
Effect of exchange rate changes and others	(953		)	9,139
Deferred income taxes	1,014			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable	(2,312		)	(5,468		)
Inventories	(8,462		)	(6,807		)
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(5,585		)	(11,076		)
Accounts payable	(7,599		)	(6,156		)
Accrued compensation	1,313			846
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	2,333			(3,860		)
Deferred revenues	209			(62		)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	(1,941		)	1,527
Investing activities
Purchase of short-term and long-term available-for-sale securities	(120,514		)	(154,887		)
Sale or maturity of short-term and long-term available-for-sale securities	198,621			139,494
Capital expenditures	(14,661		)	(18,490		)
Cash paid for intangible assets and other investments	(4,941		)	(1,692		)
Proceeds from sale of other long-term investments	365			3,426
Cash paid related to acquisitions, net of cash acquired	(114,791		)	—
Net cash used in investing activities	(55,921		)	(32,149		)
Financing activities
Repayment of capital lease liability	(19		)	(15		)
Cash paid to settle contingent liability related to acquisition	(2,900		)	—
Proceeds from sale of common stock under employee stock purchase plan	1,851			1,713
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options	7,691			1,185
Net cash provided by financing activities	6,623			2,883
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	262			(1,136		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(50,977		)	(28,875		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	107,159			330,635
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	56,182		$	301,760
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	4,384		$	4,183
Cash paid for income taxes	$	1,246		$	1,860

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

VOLCANO CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2014

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Nature of Operations

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Volcano Corporation (“we,” “us,” “our,” “Volcano” or the “Company”) contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q include our financial statements and the financial statements of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. Pursuant to these rules and regulations, the Company has condensed or omitted certain information and footnote disclosures it normally includes in its annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., or GAAP. In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary, which are of a normal and recurring nature, for the fair presentation of the Company’s financial position and of the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full fiscal year or any future periods.

Reclassification

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period condensed consolidated financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.

Net Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing consolidated net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing consolidated net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and dilutive common stock equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Our potentially dilutive shares include outstanding common stock options, unvested restricted stock units, including those with performance or market conditions, and incremental shares issuable upon the conversion of the Senior Convertible Notes or upon exercise of the warrants relating to the Senior Convertible Notes. Such potentially dilutive shares are excluded when the effect would be to reduce net loss per share or increase net income per share as discussed in the following paragraph. For the three months ended June 30, 2014, 374,000 in the money option and award shares were dilutive for the period and potentially dilutive shares totaling 28.8 million have not been included in the computation of diluted net income per share, as the result would be anti-dilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, potentially dilutive shares totaling 24.2 million have not been included in the computation of diluted net loss per share, as the result would be anti-dilutive.

Diluted net income (loss) per common share does not include any incremental shares related to the Senior Convertible Notes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. Because the principal amount of the Senior Convertible Notes will be settled in cash upon conversion, only the conversion spread relating to the Senior Convertible Notes may be included in our calculation of diluted net loss per common share. As such, the Senior Convertible Notes have no impact on diluted net income (loss) per common share until the price of our common stock exceeds the conversion price (initially $29.64 for the 2.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015, or the 2015 Notes, and $32.83 for the 1.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2017, or the 2017 Notes, or collectively, the Notes, subject to adjustments) of the Notes. In addition, the diluted net income (loss) per common share does not include any incremental shares related to the exercise of the warrants related to the Notes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. The warrants will not have an impact on diluted net income (loss) per common share until the price of our common stock exceeds the strike price of the warrants (initially $34.875 for the warrants issued in connection with the 2015 Notes offering and $37.59 for the warrants issued in connection with the 2017 Notes offering, subject to adjustments). When the market price of our stock exceeds the strike price, as applicable, we will include, in the diluted net income (loss) per common share calculation, the effect of the additional shares that may be issued upon exercise of the warrants using the treasury stock method to the extent the effect is not anti-dilutive.

The call options to purchase our common stock, which we purchased to hedge against potential dilution upon conversion of the Notes, are not considered for purposes of calculating the total dilutive weighted average shares outstanding, as their effect would be anti-dilutive. Upon exercise, the call options will mitigate the dilutive effect of the Notes.

On December 2, 2013, our board of directors authorized a $200 million share repurchase program. Pursuant to this approval, we entered into a $100 million accelerated share repurchase, or ASR, program with a counterparty, and received a total of 4,705,683 shares of our common stock (see Note 5 "Stockholders' Equity"), of which 3,557,137 shares of our common stock were delivered in December 2013 and 1,148,546 shares of our common stock were delivered in March 2014. The weighted average number of the shares received was removed from the denominator of the basic and diluted net loss per share calculation at the share delivery date.

The basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share calculations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are as follows (in thousands, except per share data):



	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013			2014			2013
Net income (loss)	$	282	$	(2,388	)	$	(10,622	)	$	(5,549	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic	51,300		54,574			51,630			54,389
Weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted	51,674		54,574			51,630			54,389
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	0.01	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.10	)
Diluted	$	0.01	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.10	)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB amended the accounting standards to create Topic 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The updated guidance is effective for us beginning in fiscal year 2017 and early application is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the new standard to determine the effect, if any, on our consolidated financial statements.

2. Acquisitions and Acquisition-Related Items

AtheroMed Acquisition

On June 17, 2014, we completed the acquisition of all outstanding equity interests in AtheroMed, Inc., or AtheroMed, a privately-held company engaged in the development of atherectomy technology used in the treatment of peripheral artery disease, or PAD. AtheroMed’s Phoenix® Atherectomy System, or Phoenix, received 510(k) clearance in January 2014, has a CE Mark, and has reimbursement in the U.S. and select countries in Europe. The primary reasons for the acquisition were to diversify our product offerings and to allow us the opportunity to better position ourselves in the peripheral vascular market. The transaction was accounted for as a business combination.

We paid approximately $116.5 million in cash at closing, which amount was partially offset by our acquisition at closing of approximately $1.7 million in cash. This closing cash payment is subject to a post-closing net working capital adjustment. In addition, we agreed to pay a cash milestone of $15.0 million if FDA clearance of a premarket 510(k) notification is received on or before November 15, 2014 for AtheroMed's second generation Phoenix Atherectomy System. The fair market value of this contingent consideration was preliminarily estimated to be $14.0 million at acquisition. Furthermore, we may be required to make payments upon reaching certain sales milestones. We estimate the contingent sales milestone payments to be approximately $39.4 million and the fair value of this contingent consideration was preliminarily estimated to be $29.0 million at acquisition.

The assets acquired, consisting primarily of developed technology valued at $61.9 million and IPR&D valued at $9.0 million, were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The excess of purchase price over the fair value amounts of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is $95.8 million, which represents the goodwill amount resulting from the acquisition, was allocated to our medical segment and is not deductible for income tax purposes.

As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company is still finalizing the allocation of the purchase price and the valuation of its contingent consideration. Changes to the current allocation and contingent consideration may occur as additional information becomes available including, but not limited to, potential working capital adjustments, the valuation of inventory, fixed assets, intangible assets and deferred taxes, with such changes recorded as an adjustment to goodwill.

The acquisition was not individually or collectively considered material to the overall unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and results of operations of the Company. We have included the operating results associated with the AtheroMed acquisition in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.

Pioneer Acquisition

On August 30, 2013, we completed the acquisition of the Pioneer Plusre-entry catheter product line, or Pioneer, from Medtronic, Inc. or Medtronic. The product line is an interventional medical device designed to enable the crossing of sub-total, total and chronic total occlusions within the peripheral vasculature, potentially eliminating the need for surgery. The primary reason for the acquisition was to increase our penetration of the peripheral vascular market with a therapeutic product offering and continue to diversify our product offerings beyond coronary applications.

This transaction was structured as an asset purchase and was accounted for as a business combination with an aggregate purchase price of $15.0 million. The assets acquired, primarily $12.7 million of intangible assets, were recorded at their

estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The excess of purchase price over the fair value amounts of the assets acquired

and liabilities assumed was $1.5 million, which represented the goodwill amount resulting from the acquisition and was allocated

to our medical segment and is not deductible for income tax purposes. As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company is still finalizing the allocation of the purchase price. Changes to the current allocation may occur as additional information becomes available related to the valuation of inventory, fixed assets and intangible assets and deferred taxes, with such changes recorded as an adjustment to goodwill.

The acquisition was not individually or collectively considered material to the overall unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the results of the Company’s operations. We have included the operating results associated with the Pioneer acquisition in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.

Crux Acquisition

On December 12, 2012 we completed the acquisition of all outstanding equity interests in Crux Biomedical, Inc., or Crux, a privately-held company engaged in the development of filter technology for the vascular, cardiovascular and interventional radiology markets. The primary reason for the acquisition was to diversify our product offerings, allow us the opportunity to better position ourselves in the peripheral vascular market and to increase our IVUS product sales. The transaction was accounted for as a business combination. The operating results of Crux from the date of acquisition were included in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Under the merger agreement and the amendment to the merger agreement, we agreed to pay a cash milestone payment of $3.0 million following the achievement of written clearance by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, of a 510(k) notification for the commercial sale in the United States of an inferior vena cava filter retrieval device developed by Crux, provided such 510(k) notification was submitted on or before November 30, 2013. The 510(k) notification was submitted on November 30, 2013 and was approved by FDA during the first quarter of 2014. The $3.0 million cash milestone was paid during the first quarter of 2014.

In addition, subject to the terms of the merger agreement, we may be required to make payments upon reaching various sales milestones. We determined the fair value of the contingent consideration relative to the milestone payments based on commercial sales of Crux products using various estimates, including revenue projections, discount rates and amount of time until the conditions of the milestone payments are met. This fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market, representing a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. At June 30, 2014, for the fair value relative to the milestone payments based on the commercial sales of Crux products, the key assumptions in applying the income approach include a 10% discount rate and probability-weighted expected milestone payment ranges from $26.4 million to $50.2 million based on estimated commercial sales of Crux products ranging from $87.0 million to $154.0 million from 2014 to 2019. During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, we reduced the future revenue estimates based on our initial commercial experience. Offsetting the reduction in the liability related to the change in future revenue estimates was a reduction in the discount rate from 14% to 10% to reflect a reduction in the risk premium associated with commercialization now that the product is in full market release. Using different valuation assumptions could result in significant differences in the fair value of the contingent consideration and accretion expense in the current or future periods.

The following table sets forth the changes in the estimated fair value of the Company’s contingent liabilities (net of working capital receivable adjustment) measured on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Fair value measurement at beginning of period	$	31,504		$	31,167		$	33,638		$	30,231
Change in fair value measurement included in operating expenses	(7,214		)	720			(6,348		)	1,656
Contingent consideration settled and other	—			(200		)	(3,000		)	(200		)
Fair value measurement at end of period	24,290			31,687			24,290			31,687

Sync-Rx Acquisition

On November 26, 2012, we acquired all of the outstanding equity interests in Sync-Rx Ltd., or Sync-Rx, a privately-held company, which is engaged in the development of advanced software applications that optimize and facilitate transcatheter cardiovascular interventions using automated online image processing. The Sync-Rx technology will provide us with a platform on which to build a range of advanced software features that will aid clinical decision-making by providing angiography and intra-body image enhancement, measurement and non-invasive imaging and intravascular co-registration capabilities, and future opportunities in physiology and peripheral and minimally invasive structural heart therapy guidance. The transaction was accounted for as a business combination. The operating results of Sync-Rx from the date of acquisition were included in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In connection with the acquisition, we recorded a contingent liability of $1.1 million related to a government grant received to develop the underlying technology. The timing of repayment of the grant is contingent upon the generation of revenues derived from the technology for which grant proceeds were received. We expect to generate revenues sufficient to repay the liability in its entirety. The grant was recorded as other long term debt at its present value using various estimates, including revenue projections, discount rate and estimated years of re-payment. This fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market, representing a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. At acquisition, for the fair value relative to this liability, the key assumptions in applying the income approach included an 8% discount rate and estimated commercial sales derived from the underlying technology ranging from $256.1 million to $298.3 million over the expected period of re-payment of 10 to 16 years. The long term liability will be accreted to the re-payment amount of $1.9 million plus interest, with such accretion recorded as interest expense over the expected period of re-payment. As of June 30, 2014, there were no significant changes in the range of outcomes for the contingent liability recognized as a result of the acquisition.

Acquisition-Related Items

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, we recorded income of $6.4 million and $5.4 million, respectively, from acquisition-related items. We recorded $7.0 million and $6.2 million, respectively, of income related to the change in fair value of the contingent consideration associated with the Crux and AtheroMed acquisitions, which is primarily due to revised revenue forecasts for Crux partially offset by the passage of time, a change in the discount factor for Crux and $629,000 and $800,000, respectively, in transaction costs primarily associated with the AtheroMed and Sync-Rx acquisitions.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, we recorded charges of $911,000 and $2.5 million, respectively, in acquisition-related items, including charges of $720,000 and $1.7 million, respectively, related to the change in fair value of the contingent consideration associated with the Crux acquisition, which is primarily due to the passage of time, and $191,000 and $835,000, respectively, in transaction costs primarily associated with the Crux and Sync-Rx acquisitions.

3. Financial Statement Details

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Available-for-Sale Investments

We invest our excess funds in U.S. government securities, corporate fixed income securities, commercial paper, certificates of deposit and money market funds. As of June 30, 2014, all of these investments were classified as available-for-sale and mature within 15 months. These investments are recorded at their estimated fair value, with unrealized gains or losses reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, available-for-sale investments are detailed as follows (in thousands):

At June 30, 2014

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
Short-term:
Corporate debt securities	$	131,919	$	54	$	15	$	131,958
U.S. Treasury and agency debt securities	18,005		18		—		18,023
Short-term available-for-sale investments	$	149,924	$	72	$	15	$	149,981
Long-term:
Corporate debt securities	$	35,530	$	—	$	20	$	35,510
U.S. Treasury and agency debt securities	—		—		—		—
Long-term available for sale investments	$	35,530	$	—	$	20	$	35,510

At December 31, 2013

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
Short-term:
Corporate debt securities	$	164,570	$	72	$	4	$	164,638
U.S. Treasury and agency debt securities	66,153		2		18		66,137
Short-term available-for-sale investments	$	230,723	$	74	$	22	$	230,775
Long-term:
Corporate debt securities	$	11,697	$	30	$	—	$	11,727
U.S. Treasury and agency debt securities	23,008		15		—		23,023
Long-term available for sale investments	$	34,705	$	45	$	—	$	34,750

Available-for-sale investments that are in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are detailed as follows (in thousands):



	At June 30, 2014
	Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
Corporate debt securities	$	77,621	$	36
U.S. Treasury and agency debt securities	—		—
	$	77,621	$	36



	At December 31, 2013
	Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
Corporate debt securities	$	21,226	$	4
U.S. Treasury and agency debt securities	40,982		18
	$	62,208	$	22

Derivative Financial Instruments

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts

We are exposed to foreign currency risks through our global operations, primarily in Japan and Europe, and when we enter into transactions in non-functional currencies. Exchange rate fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies, primarily the Japanese yen, or yen, and the euro, could adversely affect our financial results. We use derivative financial instruments to mitigate our foreign currency exposures. We do not enter into derivative instruments for speculative purposes.

we use to mitigate this exposure are not designated for hedge accounting treatments, and as a result, changes in their fair values are recorded in exchange rate gain (loss) in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations.

We hedge forecasted intercompany inventory transactions that are denominated in yen and euro. Forward contracts are used to hedge forecasted intercompany inventory transactions over specific time periods. These forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges and have maturity dates of up to 15 months. Changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges, excluding time value of the hedges which is recorded as interest expense, are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), or AOCI, within stockholders' equity. Once the underlying hedged transaction occurs, we de-designate the derivative, cease to apply hedge accounting treatment to the transaction, reclassify the gain or loss recorded to date from AOCI into cost of sales, and record any further gains or losses to exchange rate gain (loss). We evaluate hedge effectiveness at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis. To the extent we experience ineffectiveness in our hedges, the gains or losses accumulated in other comprehensive income associated with the ineffective portion of the hedge are reclassified immediately into exchange rate gain (loss). We adjust the level and use of derivatives as soon as practicable after learning that an exposure has changed. We review all exposures on derivative positions on a regular basis.

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the notional amount of our outstanding forward contracts was $121.6 million and $97.3 million, respectively, of which $64.0 million and $40.3 million, respectively, were designated as cash flow hedges. At June 30, 2014, our outstanding forward contracts mature through September 2015.

As of June 30, 2014, the deferred loss, net of tax, for those derivative contracts that qualified for hedge accounting treatment was $121,500, all of which will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into cost of sales at the then-current values over the next twelve months as the underlying hedged transactions are recognized.

The following tables summarize the location and fair values of derivative instruments on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets (in thousands) at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The fair value amounts are presented on a gross basis and are segregated between derivatives that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments and those that are not.



	At June 30, 2014
	Asset Derivatives			Liability Derivatives
	Balance sheet location	Fair Value		Balance sheet location	Fair Value
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
Foreign exchange forward contracts	Other current assets	$	127	Other current liabilities	$	397
Foreign exchange forward contracts	Other long-term assets	26		Other long-term liabilities	34
Total Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments		153			431

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Foreign exchange forward contracts	Other current assets	503		Other current liabilities	592
Total Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments		503			592

Total Derivatives		$	656		$	1,023



	As of December 31, 2013
	Asset Derivatives			Liability Derivatives
	Balance sheet location	Fair Value		Balance sheet location	Fair Value
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
Foreign exchange forward contracts	Other current assets	$	954	Other current liabilities	$	251
Foreign exchange forward contracts	Other long-term assets	81		Other long-term liabilities	—
Total Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments		1,035			251

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Foreign exchange forward contracts	Other current assets	1,953		Other current liabilities	1,164
Total Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments		1,953			1,164

Total Derivatives		$	2,988		$	1,415

The Company has elected to present the fair value of derivative assets and liabilities within the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets on a gross basis even when derivative transactions are subject to master netting arrangements and may otherwise qualify for net presentation. The following table provides information (in thousands) as if the Company had elected to offset the asset and liability balances of derivative instruments, netted in accordance with various criteria as stipulated by the terms of the master netting arrangements with each of the counterparties. Derivatives not subject to master netting arrangements are not eligible for net presentation.



	As of June 30, 2014
				Gross Amount Not Offset on the Balance Sheet
	Gross Amount of Recognized Assets (Liabilities)			Financial Instruments			Cash Collateral (Received) or Pledged	Net Amount
Derivative Assets
Foreign exchange forward contracts	$	656		$	(656	)	—	$	—
Derivative Liabilities
Foreign exchange forward contracts	(1,023		)	656			—	(367		)
Total	$	(367	)	—			—	(367		)



	As of December 31, 2013
				Gross Amount Not Offset on the Balance Sheet
	Gross Amount of Recognized Assets (Liabilities)			Financial Instruments			Cash Collateral (Received) or Pledged	Net Amount
Derivative Assets
Foreign exchange forward contracts	$	2,988		$	(1,415	)	—	$	1,573
Derivative Liabilities
Foreign exchange forward contracts	(1,415		)	1,415			—	—
Total	$	1,573		—			—	1,573

The following table summarizes the effect of our foreign exchange forward contracts on our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands).



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
Gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income on foreign currency forward contracts (effective portion)	$	(287	)	$	8		$	(658	)	$	8
Gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into cost of revenue (effective portion)	263			—			297			—
Gain (loss) recognized in income (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing)	(47		)	(32		)	(40		)	(32		)

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Gain (loss) recognized in exchange rate gain (loss), net	$	(417	)	$	1,966		$	(942	)	$	5,882

Options and Warrants Related to Our Convertible Notes

In connection with our convertible debt offering in December 2012, we purchased call options on our common stock. The call options give us the right to purchase up to approximately 14.0 million shares of our common stock at $32.83 per share subject to certain adjustments that generally correspond to the adjustments to the conversion rate for the underlying debt. Additionally, we sold warrants, which give the purchasers of the warrants the right to purchase up to approximately 14.0 million shares of our common stock at $37.59 per share, subject to certain adjustments.

In connection with our convertible debt offering in September 2010 and subsequent partial repurchase in December 2012, we purchased call options on our common stock and sold warrants. The remaining call options give us the right to purchase up

to approximately 850,000 shares of our common stock at $29.64 per share, subject to certain adjustments, and the remaining warrants give the counterparty the right to purchase up to approximately 850,000 shares of our common stock at $34.88 per share, subject to certain adjustments.

In accordance with the authoritative guidance, we concluded that these call options and warrants were indexed to our stock. Therefore, the call options and warrants were classified as equity instruments and are not being marked to market prospectively unless certain conditions as described in the 2017 and 2015 Notes occur.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments which subject us to potential credit risk consist of our cash and cash equivalents, short-term and long-term available-for-sale investments, foreign currency derivative contracts, and trade accounts receivable.

We have established guidelines to limit our exposure to credit risk by placing investments with high credit quality financial institutions, diversifying our investment portfolio and holding investments with maturities that maintain safety and liquidity. We place our cash and cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions. Deposits with these financial institutions may exceed the amount of insurance provided; however, these deposits typically are redeemable upon demand. Therefore we believe the financial risks associated with these financial instruments are minimal.

Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the net invoice value and are not interest bearing. We consider receivables past due based on the contractual payment terms. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers, and generally we do not require collateral on our accounts receivable. We estimate the need for allowances for potential credit losses based on historical collection activity and the facts and circumstances relevant to specific customers and we record a provision for uncollectible accounts when collection is uncertain. To date, we have not experienced significant credit related losses.

We are exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the banks with which we transact foreign currency contracts. We currently hold foreign exchange forward contracts with two counterparties. Our overall risk of loss in the event of a counterparty default is limited to the amount of any unrealized gains on outstanding contracts (i.e., those contracts that have a positive fair value) at the date of default. We manage this credit risk by executing foreign currency contracts with counterparties that meet our minimum requirements, and monitoring the credit ratings of our counterparties on a periodic basis. As of June 30, 2014, we had no credit exposure as our contract liability exceeded assets with both counterparty banks.

In connection with the issuance of our 2015 Notes and our 2017 Notes, we purchased call options from counterparties. Non-performance by the counterparties under these call options would potentially expose us to dilution of our common stock to the extent our stock price exceeds the conversion price (in the case of the 2015 Notes and the 2017 Notes).

We purchase integrated circuits and other key components for use in our products. For certain components, which are currently single sourced, there are relatively few sources of supply. Although we believe that other suppliers could provide similar components on comparable terms, establishment of additional or replacement suppliers cannot be accomplished quickly. Any significant supply interruption could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For further discussion, see “Risk Factors—Our manufacturing operations are dependent upon third party suppliers, some of which are sole-sourced, which makes us vulnerable to supply problems, price fluctuations and manufacturing delays.”

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as an exit price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Authoritative guidance establishes a three-level hierarchy for disclosure that is based on the extent and level of judgment used to estimate the fair value of assets and liabilities.

•

Level 1—Valuations based on quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date. Since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market, valuation of these products does not entail a significant degree of judgment. Our Level 1 assets consist of money market funds and U.S. Treasury and agency debt securities.

•

Level 2—Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data, such as alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. Our Level 2 assets consist of corporate debt securities including commercial paper, corporate bonds, certificates of deposit and foreign currency forward contracts.


•	Level 3—Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. Our Level 3 liability includes the contingent consideration related to the Crux acquisition and the other long-term debt related to the Sync-Rx acquisition.

We utilize a third-party pricing service to assist us in obtaining fair value pricing for our investments. Pricing for certain securities is based on proprietary models. Inputs are documented in accordance with the fair value disclosure hierarchy. We also utilize third-party financial institutions to assist us in obtaining fair value pricing for our foreign currency forward contracts.

Contingent consideration arrangements obligate us to pay former shareholders of an acquired entity if specified future events occur or conditions are met such as the achievement of certain technological milestones or the achievement of targeted revenue milestones. We measure such liabilities using Level 3 unobservable inputs, applying the income approach, such as the discounted cash flow technique, or the probability-weighted scenario method. We used various key assumptions, such as the probability of achievement of the agreed milestones and the discount rate, in our determination of the fair value of contingent consideration. We monitor the fair value of the contingent consideration and the subsequent revisions are reflected in our unaudited consolidated statements of operations. For a further discussion on the key assumptions used in determining the fair value and the change in the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, refer to Note 2, "Acquisitions and Acquisition-Related Items".

In connection with the Sync-Rx acquisition, we recorded a contingent liability related to a government grant received to develop an underlying technology. The timing of repayment of the grant is contingent upon the generation of revenues derived from the technology for which grant proceeds were received. We measure such liability using Level 3 unobservable inputs, applying the income approach, such as the discounted cash flow technique, or the probability-weighted scenario method. The grant was recorded as other long-term debt at its present value using various estimates, including revenue projections, discount rate and estimated years of re-payment. This fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market, representing a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. We monitor the fair value of the contingent liability and the subsequent revisions are reflected in our Statements of Operations. For a further discussion on the key assumptions used in determining the fair value, refer to Note 2, "Acquisitions and Acquisition-Related Items - Sync-Rx Acquisition".

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, no transfers were made into or out of the Level 1, 2, or 3 categories.

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (in thousands):



	Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2014
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Current:
Cash	$	26,897	$	26,897	$	—	$	—
Money market funds	29,285		29,285		—		—
Corporate debt securities	131,958		—		131,958		—
U.S. Treasury and agency debt securities	18,023		18,023		—		—
Foreign currency forward contracts	630		—		630		—
Non-current:
Corporate debt securities	35,510		—		35,510		—
U.S. Treasury and agency debt securities	—		—		—		—
Foreign currency forward contracts	26		—		26		—
Total assets measured at fair value	$	242,329	$	74,205	$	168,124	$	—
Liabilities:
Current:
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	989	$	—	$	989	$	—
Contingent consideration, current portion (1)	14,450		—		—		14,450
Non-current:
Foreign currency forward contracts	34		—		34		—
Other long-term debt	1,208		—		—		1,208
Contingent consideration	52,984		—		—		52,984
Total liabilities measured at fair value	$	69,665	$	—	$	1,023	$	68,642


(1)	This amount is reflected net of the fair value of the working capital receivable in the amount of $1.3 million at June 30, 2014.



	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Current:
Cash	$	98,436	$	98,436	$	—	$	—
Money market funds	8,723		8,723		—		—
Corporate debt securities	164,638		—		164,638		—
U.S. Treasury and agency debt securities	66,137		66,137		—		—
Foreign currency forward contracts	2,907		—		2,907		—
Non-current:
Corporate debt securities	11,727		—		11,727		—
U.S. Treasury and agency debt securities	23,023		23,023		—		—
Foreign currency forward contracts	81		—		81		—
Total assets measured at fair value	$	375,672	$	196,319	$	179,353	$	—
Liabilities:
Current:
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	1,415	$	—	$	1,415	$	—
Contingent consideration, current portion (1)	3,750		—		—		3,750
Non-current:
Other long-term debt	1,268		—		—		1,268
Contingent consideration	29,888		—		—		29,888
Total liabilities measured at fair value	$	36,321	$	—	$	1,415	$	34,906


(1)	This amount is reflected net of the fair value of the working capital receivable in the amount of $1.2 million at December 31, 2013.

Inventories

Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):



	June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Finished goods (1)	$	32,956	$	27,237
Work-in-process	13,192		12,051
Raw materials	26,022		21,682
	$	72,170	$	60,970


(1)	Finished goods inventory includes consigned inventory of $6.4 million and $5.6 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):



	June 30, 2014
Intangible assets subject to amortization	Cost		Accumulated Amortization		Net		Weighted- Average Life (in years) (1)
Developed technology	$	120,781	$	20,088	$	100,693	12.3
Licenses	7,479		7,127		352		8.8
Customer relationships	4,239		4,063		176		6.1
Patents and trademarks	13,855		3,108		10,747		13.8
Covenant not to compete	600		158		442		3.0
	146,954		34,544		112,410		12.0
Intangible assets not yet subject to amortization
In-process research and development	14,560		—		14,560		n/a
	$	161,514	$	34,544	$	126,970



	December 31, 2013
Intangible assets subject to amortization	Cost		Accumulated Amortization		Net		Weighted- Average Life (in years) (1)
Developed technology	$	57,507	$	16,393	$	41,114	8.6
Licenses	7,441		7,102		339		8.8
Customer relationships	4,441		4,312		129		6.1
Patents and trademarks	13,668		2,894		10,774		13.2
Covenant not to compete	300		108		192		3.0
	83,357		30,809		52,548		9.2
Intangible assets not yet subject to amortization
In-process research and development	5,560		—		5,560		n/a
	$	88,917	$	30,809	$	58,108


(1)	Weighted average life of intangible assets is presented excluding fully amortized assets.

At June 30, 2014, future amortization expense related to our intangible assets subject to amortization is expected to be as follows (in thousands):




2014	5,991
2015	11,164
2016	10,975
2017	10,412
2018	10,314
Thereafter	63,554
	$	112,410

Restructuring Activity

Disposables Manufacturing Transition to Costa Rica Initiative

During the second quarter of 2013, our management approved plans to consolidate and transition our manufacturing resources related to the manufacture of disposables to Costa Rica. Activities under this restructuring plan were initiated in the second quarter of 2013 and are expected to be substantially completed by the end of 2014. We estimate that this restructuring plan will result in total pre-tax charges of approximately $2.8 million, all of which are one-time termination benefits, including severance payments and continuing medical benefits.

A summary of the activities related to this initiative is presented below (in thousands):



	Employee Termination Cost
Balance at 01/01/2013	$	—
Restructuring charges during 2013	333
Payments during 2013	(333		)
Balance at 12/31/2013	$	—
Restructuring charges during the first half of 2014	189
Payments during the first half of 2014	(189		)
Balance at 06/30/2014	$	—

Strategic Reorganization Initiative

During the third quarter of 2013, our management evaluated various development projects, product lines and functional areas in an effort to reprioritize and reallocate our resources within our distribution, research and development, and clinical programs to focus on development and commercial efforts that we believe better advance our key strategies. The key elements under this restructuring plan include the discontinuation of development programs for our FL.IVUS, FL.ICE and OCT intravascular coronary imaging development programs, the termination of the commercial sale of the ReFLOW product line, and a modest reorganization of several functional areas and business units within the Company.

Activities under this restructuring plan were initiated in the third quarter of 2013 and were substantially completed during the second quarter of 2014. We estimate that this restructuring plan will result in total pre-tax charges of approximately $18.9 million, of which approximately $6.7 million resulted or will result in cash outlay. The following provides a summary of our expected total costs associated with the plan by major type of costs (in thousands):



Type of Cost	Total Estimated Amount
Employee termination benefits	$	2,659
Asset impairments	12,220
Other associated costs	4,005
Total	$	18,884

A summary of the restructuring charges related to this initiative is presented below (in thousands):



	Employee Termination Benefits			Asset Impairments			Other Associated Costs			Total
Balance at 01/01/2013	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Restructuring charges during 2013	2,867			11,402			4,772			19,041
Payments/write-off during 2013	(797		)	(11,402		)	—			(12,199		)
Balance at 12/31/2013	$	2,070		$	—		$	4,772		$	6,842
Restructuring charges during the first half of 2014	$	(209	)	818			(766		)	(157		)
Payments/write-off during the first half of 2014	$	(1,329	)	(818		)	(4,006		)	(6,153		)
Balance at 06/30/2014	532			—			—			532

The employee termination benefits include severance payments and continuing medical and other benefits. The asset impairments are related to the discontinued programs and include impairment of property, plant and equipment assets, impairment of intangible assets and other tangible asset impairments. The other associated costs include the contract termination costs related to our purchase and lease commitments, and other costs directly related to the restructuring activities. The $766,000 reduction in other associated costs is primarily from negotiating a favorable settlement on a contract termination. Reductions in employee termination benefits are the result of final severance costs being less than previously estimated.

All charges were recorded in the restructuring charges line item within our unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations.

Both restructuring initiatives are related to our medical segment.

Debt

In December 2012, we issued $460 million aggregate principal amount of 1.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2017, or the 2017 Notes, in an offering registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Interest is payable semiannually in arrears on June 1 and December 1, commencing on June 1, 2013.

In September 2010, we issued $115 million aggregate principal amount of 2.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015, or the 2015 Notes, in an offering registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Interest is payable semiannually in arrears on March 1 and September 1, commencing on March 1, 2011. In December 2012, in connection with the issuance of the 2017 Notes, we repurchased $90 million of the $115 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2015 Notes.

The carrying values of the liability and equity components of both the 2017 Notes and the 2015 Notes are reflected in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets as follows (in thousands):



	June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
Long-term debt:
2.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015:
Principal amount	$	25,000		$	25,000
Unamortized discount of liability component	(1,282		)	(1,818		)
Unamortized debt issuance costs	(143		)	(204		)
Carrying value of liability component	23,575			22,978

1.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2017:
Principal amount	460,000			460,000
Unamortized discount of liability component	(64,667		)	(72,902		)
Unamortized debt issuance costs	(8,040		)	(9,064		)
Carrying value of liability component	387,293			378,034
Total long-term debt	$	410,868		$	401,012

Equity—net carrying value
2.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015	$	452		$	452
1.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2017	89,415			89,415

The fair values of the Notes, which are all Level 2 measurements, are summarized as follows (in thousands):



	June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
2.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015	$	24,382	$	25,950
1.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2017	462,475		456,320
Total	$	486,857	$	482,270

4. Commitments and Contingencies

St. Jude Medical and LightLab Litigation Settlement

On August 7, 2014, Volcano Corporation (“Volcano”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Axsun Technologies, Inc. (“Axsun” and together with Volcano, the “Volcano Parties”), entered into a Settlement, Release, License Agreement, and Covenants Not To Sue (the “Agreement”) with St. Jude Medical, Inc. (“St. Jude”) and its affiliates St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc., St. Jude Medical Systems AB, St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc., and LightLab Imaging, Inc. (“LightLab”) (collectively, the “St. Jude Parties”), to settle all currently ongoing litigation among the Volcano Parties and the St. Jude Parties. The settlement covers the following civil actions:


•	LightLab Imaging, Inc. v. Axsun Technologies, Inc. and Volcano Corporation, in the Massachusetts Superior Court and the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (the “Massachusetts Proceeding”);


•	Axsun Technologies, Inc. and Volcano Corporation v. LightLab Imaging, Inc., in the Delaware Chancery Court;


•	LightLab Imaging, Inc. v. Axsun Technologies, Inc. and Volcano Corporation, in the Delaware Chancery Court;


•	St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc., St. Jude Medical Systems AB, and St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc. v. Volcano Corporation, in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware;


•	St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc., St. Jude Medical Systems AB, and St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc. v. Volcano Corporation, in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware;


•	Volcano Corporation v. St. Jude Medical, Cardiovascular and Ablation Technologies Division, Inc.; St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc.; St. Jude Medical, U.S. Division; St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc.; and St. Jude Medical Systems AB, in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; and


•	St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc., v. Volcano Corporation, and Michelle K. Lee, Deputy Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, in the United States Patent and Trademark Office and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

No payments are being made in connection with the Agreement.

Pursuant to the Agreement, the parties agreed to cause each of the Litigations to be dismissed with prejudice and to not seek appellate review of a recent decision issued in the Massachusetts Proceeding.

The Agreement contains mutual releases covering all claims that the Volcano Parties or the St. Jude Parties, or their respective affiliates, have or may have against the other in connection with the Litigations.

The Agreement contains covenants not to sue by each party for (i) infringement of any of the patents that are the subject of any of the Litigations, (ii) infringement of any of the other party’s patents (subject to specified exceptions) by a party’s current products, products in the field of functional measurement for which regulatory approval is submitted before August 7, 2016, or features of those products, (iii) misappropriation of certain claimed trade secrets communicated each way between Axsun and LightLab and (iv) claims of any nature that relate to any of the Litigations. The covenants described in the preceding sentence do not extend to any: (a) patent infringement claims by St. Jude with respect to any (1) wireless communication of physiological pressure sensor data between a sensor and a receiver, or (2) products for intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT); (b) patent infringement claims by Volcano with respect to any (1) iFR^® patents or (2) products for intravascular ultrasound (i.e., IVUS products); or (c) products of an assignee existing prior to the assignment.

The agreement contains licenses by each party to the other party of the patents that are the subject of the Litigations.

Each party to the Agreement also agreed not to challenge the validity or enforceability of any of the patents that are the subject of any of the Litigations during the term of the Agreement, unless such party is accused of infringing the applicable patent. The Agreement terminates on August 7, 2036.

Litigation-LightLab

On January 7, 2009, LightLab Imaging, Inc., or LightLab, which was acquired by St. Jude Medical, Inc., or St. Jude, in 2010, filed a complaint against us and our wholly owned subsidiary, Axsun, in the Superior Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk

County, seeking injunctive relief and unspecified damages, or the Massachusetts Action. The complaint included allegations that Volcano interfered with an agreement between Axsun and LightLab and with LightLab's advantageous business relationship with Axsun, breach of contract by Axsun, that Axsun and Volcano misappropriated LightLab's confidential information and trade secrets, and violated Chapter 93A, a Massachusetts statute that provides for recovery of up to three times damages plus attorney's fees (93A).

On April 7, 2011, the court entered an Amended Final Judgment, in the Massachusetts Action: a) in favor of Volcano and Axsun on LightLab's claims for trade secret misappropriation on items 1-30 on LightLab's list of alleged trade secrets, b) ordered Volcano and Axsun to collectively pay $600,000 in damages and $4.5 million in attorneys' fees, c) in favor of LightLab on its claims against Axsun for breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, for violation of 93A, and misappropriation of trade secrets for disclosing three particular items to Volcano in December 2008 - the specifications for the two lasers provided by Axsun to LightLab and one Axsun laser prototype made in 2008, d) in favor of LightLab on its claims against Volcano for intentional interference with a contract and advantageous business relationship, unjust enrichment, violation of 93A, and misappropriation of trade secrets for the same three trade secrets described above. In addition, the Court denied a majority of LightLab's requested injunctions, and entered limited injunctive relief, none of which management believes have a material effect upon Volcano.

LightLab appealed various decisions of the Court including, a) the Court's pre-trial rulings excluding certain lost profits damages evidence that LightLab sought to introduce at trial; b) the Court's decisions adverse to LightLab's claims for trade secret misappropriation in items 1-30 of LightLab's alleged list of trade secrets, including various rulings requiring evidence of use or intent to use as a prerequisite for injunctive relief; c) the Court's post-trial decisions denying permanent injunctive relief that LightLab requested as terms of the Final Judgment; and; d) the denial of LightLab's motion to alter or amend the Final Judgment, which motion sought to obtain additional declaratory relief barring Axsun from “supplying” tunable lasers to Volcano. Volcano and Axsun did not cross appeal the Amended Final Judgment in 2011, and Volcano and Axsun satisfied their payment obligations under the Amended Final Judgment by Volcano paying LightLab approximately $5.4 million. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued a ruling in Volcano and Axsun's favor on July 28, 2014.

In February 2010, Volcano and Axsun commenced an action in the Delaware Chancery Court, or the Chancery Court Action, against LightLab seeking a declaration of Volcano and Axsun's rights with respect to certain OCT technology, the High Definition Swept Source. LightLab then filed a counter-claim that included a claim against Axsun and Volcano for violations of 93A. This case has been stayed until such time as Volcano has achieved certain development and regulatory milestones.

Additionally, on May 24, 2011, LightLab commenced a separate action in Delaware Chancery Court, or the Second Chancery Court Action, against Volcano and Axsun alleging that Axsun is inappropriately assisting Volcano in the development of a third-party laser. The complaint seeks injunctive relief and unspecified damages. After Volcano and Axsun moved to dismiss the Second Chancery Court Action, LightLab filed an amended complaint against Volcano and Axsun, adding additional allegations regarding misappropriation of trade secrets. This case has been stayed indefinitely.

In January 2014, Volcano requested the Chancery Court dismiss the Chancery Court Actions. The Chancery Court has not ruled on this motion.

As described above, these actions were settled on August 7, 2014.

Litigation - St. Jude Medical

On July 27, 2010, St. Jude Medical filed a lawsuit against Volcano in federal district court in Delaware (collectively, with the counterclaims described below, the Delaware Patent Action), alleging that our pressure guide wire products infringe five patents owned by St. Jude Medical. St. Jude Medical is seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages. This action does not involve OCT technology and is separate from the Massachusetts Action.

On September 20, 2010, Volcano filed its response, in which we denied the allegations that our PrimeWire^®products infringe any valid claim of St. Jude Medical's asserted patents. In addition, Volcano filed a counterclaim in which we alleged that St. Jude Medical's PressureWire^®products and its RadiAnalyzer^®Xpress product infringe three Volcano patents. In our counterclaim, Volcano sought injunctive relief and monetary damages. Trials on the St. Jude Medical patents and Volcano's patents were held in October 2012.

On October 12, 2012, the court entered summary judgment for Volcano with respect to one of St. Jude Medical's asserted patents. On October 19, 2012, a jury found in favor of Volcano on the remaining four St. Jude Medical patents, finding that two of the patents were invalid and that Volcano did not infringe two of the patents. On October 22, 2012, Volcano voluntarily dismissed its claims against St. Jude Medical with respect to one of Volcano's patents. On October 25, 2012, a jury found in favor of St. Jude Medical with respect to Volcano's asserted patents. In conjunction with the trial, St. Jude Medical agreed that previous versions of its PressureWire^® products infringed Volcano's 6,976,965 patent (a pressure sensing guide wire patent).

Post-trial motions are pending or remain available to the parties in the case. Volcano and St. Jude have stipulated to a confidential damages amount.

On April 9, 2012, St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc., St. Jude Medical Systems AB and St. Jude Medical S.C. filed a sealed complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware alleging that Volcano Corporation infringes United States Patent No. 6,565,514. Trial will be in December 2014 in this case.

On April 16, 2013, Volcano filed suit in Federal District Court in Delaware against St. Jude Medical, Cardiovascular and Ablation Technologies Division, Inc., St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc., St. Jude Medical, U.S. Division, St. Jude Medical S.C. Inc., and St. Jude Medical Systems AB, (collectively, “St. Jude”) for infringement of Volcano's recently issued United States Patent Nos. 8,419,647 and 8,419,648 both entitled “Ultra Miniature Pressure Sensor.” Volcano's complaint accuses St. Jude's PressureWire^® Certus and PressureWire^® Aeris cardiac pressure sensing guide wire products (the “Accused Guide Wires”) and St. Jude's RadiAnalyzer^® Xpress Measurement System, Ilumien^® PCI Optimization System and Quantien^® Integrated FFR Platform, which are used with the Accused Guide Wires, of infringing the patented methods of United States Patent No. 8,419,647. Volcano's complaint also accuses the Accused Guide Wires of infringing the patented device claims of United States Patent No. 8,419,648. A claim construction hearing was held in November 2013, and a ruling adverse to Volcano was issued in January 2014. In February 2014, the parties submitted a joint stipulation to the Court agreeing that the Accused Guide Wires do not infringe Volcano’s patents under the Court’s claim construction ruling. The Court entered judgment in March 2014 and Volcano has appealed to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, which will likely hear the appeal prior to the end of 2014.

As described above, these actions were settled on August 7, 2014.

Litigation - CardioSpectra

On March 27, 2012, Christopher E. Banas, et al., filed a lawsuit against Volcano in federal district court in the Northern District of California, alleging claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing based on Volcano's acquisition of CardioSpectra in 2007. Specifically, plaintiffs assert that Volcano has failed to comply with the terms and the alleged implied obligations of the Merger Agreement relating to potential milestone payments. CardioSpectra was in the business of developing OCT technology; however, this litigation is separate from the Massachusetts Action.

On May 14, 2012, Volcano moved to dismiss the complaint in its entirety. The motion sought to dismiss the breach of fiduciary duty and implied covenant claims without leave for amendment, and to dismiss the breach of contract claim with leave to amend. By order dated August 6, 2012, the Court granted Volcano's motion as to all issues with leave to amend. The plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint on August 20, 2012, which included a single claim for breach of the Merger Agreement. In addition, the plaintiffs identified in the Second Amended Complaint are listed as Christopher E. Banas and Paul Castella in their respective capacities as Shareholder Representatives under the Merger Agreement. Volcano answered the Second Amended Complaint on September 4, 2012, and in the same document Volcano asserted several affirmative defenses. In March 2014, the Court granted Volcano's motion for summary judgment and entered judgment in favor of Volcano. The plaintiffs have filed a notice of appeal.

Litigation - Other

In November 2012, we became aware through newspaper reports in the Italian media that a former employee of ours was under criminal investigation for an alleged violation of Italian anti-bribery laws. We also learned that Volcano Europe B.V.B.A., our wholly-owned subsidiary, had temporarily been prohibited from establishing new contractual relationships with hospitals that are part of the Italian national health system. Following a court hearing, the temporary prohibition was lifted. The Italian public prosecutor's request that such prohibition be reinstituted was denied. The Italian public prosecutor is alleging that the approximately €5,000 that we paid to an Italian state-employed physician for conducting a training session was paid in an effort to influence the outcome of a clinical trial.

The Company believes the lawsuits and other matter described above are without merit, and intends to vigorously defend against or prosecute, as applicable, the matters described above.

We may also be a party to various other claims in the normal course of business. Legal fees and other costs associated with such actions are expensed as incurred and were not material in any period reported. Additionally, we assess, in conjunction with our legal counsel, the need to record a liability for litigation and contingencies. Reserve estimates are recorded when and if it is determined that a loss related matter is both probable and reasonably estimable. Any provisions are reviewed at least quarterly and are adjusted to reflect the impact and status of settlements, rulings, advice of counsel and other information and events pertinent to a particular matter. Based on its experience, the Company also believes that the damage amounts claimed in the lawsuits disclosed above are not a meaningful indicator of the Company's potential liability. At this time, we are not able to

predict or estimate the ultimate outcome or range of possible losses relating to the lawsuits, claims or counterclaims described above. However, we believe that the ultimate disposition of these matters, individually and in the aggregate, including the matters discussed above, will not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Our evaluation of the likely impact of these matters could change in the future, as litigation is inherently unpredictable, and unfavorable outcomes and/or defense costs, depending upon the amount and timing, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position, or cash flows in future periods.

Operating Leases

Rent expense for our facilities leases is being recognized on a straight-line basis over the respective minimum lease terms.

Commitments

We have obligations under non-cancelable purchase commitments. The majority of these obligations related to inventory, primarily raw materials. At June 30, 2014, the future minimum payments under these non-cancelable purchase commitments totaled $47.8 million. Approximately $40.8 million of these commitments will require payment in 12 months, of which $37.2 million of these commitments will require payment prior to September 30, 2014. The remaining amount will require payments on various dates through 2016.

We have commitments to provide funding of $4.6 million, £3.7 million ($6.3 million), and 16.9 million Swedish Krona ($2.5 million), respectively, for three clinical studies conducted by third-parties. At June 30, 2014, we have remaining obligations of up to $2.1 million, $5.3 million, and $2.3 million, respectively. We will be billed as services are performed under the agreement. In addition, we have entered into agreements with other third parties to sponsor clinical studies. Generally, we contract with one or more clinical research sites for a single study and no one agreement is material to our consolidated results of operations or financial condition. We are usually billed as services are performed based on enrollment and are required to make payments over periods ranging from less than one year up to five years. Our actual payments under these agreements will vary based on enrollment.

At June 30, 2014, we have a commitment to purchase an additional $2.0 million of preferred shares in an existing cost-method investment in a private company. This commitment will expire in February 2015 if the option is not exercised by the private company.

Indemnification

Our supplier, distributor and collaboration agreements generally include certain provisions for indemnification against liabilities if our products are recalled, infringe a third party’s intellectual property rights or cause bodily injury due to alleged defects in our products. Many of our customer agreements also contain indemnification obligations in favor of our customers. In addition, we have agreements with our present and former directors and executive officers indemnifying them against liabilities arising from service in their respective capacities to Volcano. We maintain directors’ and officers’ insurance policies that may limit our exposure to such liabilities. To date, we have not incurred any material costs as a result of such indemnifications and have not accrued any liabilities related to such obligations in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Sole source suppliers

We rely on a number of sole source suppliers to supply certain of our products, including our transducers and substrates used in our catheters. We do not carry significant inventory of transducers or substrates. If we had to change suppliers, we expect that it would take 6 to 24 months to identify appropriate suppliers, complete design work and undertake the necessary inspections and testing before the new transducers and substrates would be available. We are not parties to supply agreements with these suppliers but instead use purchase orders as needed.

5. Stockholders’ Equity

Share Repurchase Program

All of our repurchases were treated as effective retirements of the purchased shares and therefore reduced reported shares issued and outstanding by the number of shares repurchased. In addition, the Company recorded the excess of the purchase price over the par value of the common stock as a reduction to additional paid-in capital.

Equity Compensation Plans

Our Amended and Restated 2005 Equity Compensation Plan, or the 2005 Amended Plan, provides for an aggregate of 21,572,558 shares of our common stock that may be issued or transferred to our employees, non-employee directors and consultants.

At June 30, 2014, we have granted stock options, time-vested restricted stock units, or RSUs, and performance-based RSUs, or PRSUs, under the 2005 Amended Plan. Stock options previously granted under the 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan that are canceled or expired will increase the shares available for grant under the 2005 Amended Plan. In addition, employees have purchased shares of the Company’s common stock under the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or the Purchase Plan. According to the terms of the Purchase Plan, the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the Purchase Plan was automatically increased by 600,000 shares on January 1, 2014. At June 30, 2014, 5,796,054 shares and 554,268 shares remained available to grant under the 2005 Amended Plan and the Purchase Plan, respectively.

On February 12, 2014, our Compensation Committee adopted, under the terms of the 2005 Amended Plan, the 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan, or LTIP, and granted PRSUs under such LTIP. The PRSUs will vest contingent on the achievement of our revenue growth goal and relative total shareholder return, which is measured against the performance of a defined peer group. Half of the PRSUs are earned based on the achievement of the revenue growth goal, or the performance condition, and the remaining half of the PRSUs are earned based on the achievement of both the revenue goal and the relative total shareholder return, or the market condition.

The measurement period for the PRSUs granted under the LTIP with the performance condition is our 2014 and 2015 fiscal years. The performance condition awards can range from 0% to 200% of the number of original shares granted. If the pre-determined performance goal is met, shares of stock subject to the PRSUs with the performance condition granted to the recipient will begin to vest, with two-thirds vesting on the date of certification of achievement of the pre-determined performance goal, and the remaining one third vesting on December 31, 2016, subject to continued service.

The measurement period for the PRSUs granted under the LTIP with both the performance condition and the market condition is our 2014 and 2015 fiscal years. The market condition awards can range from 0% to 200% of the number of original shares granted. If the pre-determined market goal is met, shares of stock subject to the PRSUs with the market condition granted to the recipient will begin to vest, with two-thirds vesting on the date of certification of achievement of the pre-determined market goal, and the remaining one third vesting on December 31, 2016, subject to continued service.

Fair Value Assumptions

PRSUs with Performance Condition and RSUs

The fair value of the PRSUs with performance condition and the RSUs is estimated using the market price of our common stock on the grant date.

PRSUs with Performance Condition and Market Condition

The PRSUs with both performance condition and market condition were separated into two awards for each grant. The fair value of the PRSUs with performance condition alone is estimated as stated above. The fair value of the PRSUs that include a market condition is estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model at the grant date. The Monte Carlo method is a statistical simulation technique used to provide the grant date fair value of an award. The assumptions used in the Monte Carlo simulation to value our PRSUs with market condition are presented below:



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
Risk-free interest rate	0.3%
Expected life / remaining measurement period (years)	1.9
Estimated volatility	30.9%
Expected dividends	None
Weighted-average grant date fair value	$24.90

The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury constant maturity securities with the substantially equivalent period as the market condition measurement period remaining as of the grant date, which is 1.9 years. We utilize the volatility of our own common stock over the remaining measurement period in determining the grant date fair value. We use a zero value of the expected dividend value factor since we have not declared dividends in the past and we do not anticipate declaring dividends in the foreseeable future.

Stock Options

The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model utilizing the following weighted-average assumptions:



	Three Months Ended June 30,		Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014	2013	2014	2013
Risk-free interest rate	1.6%	0.7%	1.6%	0.6%
Expected life (years)	4.7	4.3	4.7	4.1
Estimated volatility	36.5%	41.1%	36.5%	38.7%
Expected dividends	None	None	None	None
Weighted-average grant date fair value	$6.09	$6.65	$6.34	$7.46

The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the stock option is based on the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury constant maturity securities with substantially equivalent remaining terms at the time of grant. We use our historical stock option exercise experience to estimate the expected life of our stock options. We utilize the volatility of our own common stock over the expected life in determining the grant date fair value. We use a zero value for the expected dividend value factor since we have not declared dividends in the past and we do not anticipate declaring dividends in the foreseeable future.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The first offering period under the Purchase Plan commenced in September 2007. The fair value of each purchase option under the Purchase Plan is estimated at the beginning of each purchase period using the Black-Scholes model utilizing the following weighted-average assumptions:



	Three Months Ended June 30,		Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014	2013	2014	2013
Risk-free interest rate	0.1%	0.1%	0.1%	0.1%
Expected life (years)	0.5	0.5	0.5	0.5
Estimated volatility	36.1%	30.8%	33.8%	29.6%
Expected dividends	None	None	None	None
Fair value of purchase right	$5.34	$5.09	$5.21	$5.53

The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield available on the U.S. Treasury constant maturity securities for the six-month term of each offering period in effect at the beginning of the offering period. We utilize the volatility of our own common stock over the offering period in determining the purchase rights fair value. We use a zero value for the expected dividend value factor since we have not declared dividends in the past and we do not anticipate declaring dividends in the foreseeable future.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

With the exception of PRSUs with performance condition, stock-based compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the entire award, which is generally the vesting period, net of estimated forfeitures.

We recognize the estimated compensation cost of PRSUs with performance condition on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each vesting tranche of the award, net of estimated forfeitures.

The following table sets forth stock-based compensation expense included in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Cost of revenues	$	158	$	194	$	321	$	386
Selling, general and administrative	3,129		3,579		6,411		6,560
Research and development	363		476		783		901
	$	3,650	$	4,249	$	7,515	$	7,847

6. Segment and Geographic Information

Our chief operating decision-maker reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis, accompanied by disaggregated information about segment revenues by product and geographic region for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing financial performance. We have two reporting segments, the first being the medical segment which includes the manufacture, sale, discovery, development and commercialization of products for the diagnosis of atherosclerosis in the coronary arteries and peripheral vascular system. In addition we have an industrial segment which includes the discovery, development, manufacture and sale of micro-optical spectrometers and optical channel monitors to telecommunications and other industrial companies.

We do not assess the performance of our segments on other measures of income or expense, such as depreciation and amortization, operating income or net income. We do not produce reports for, or measure the performance of, our segments on any asset-based metrics. Therefore, segment information is presented only for revenues by product.

The following table sets forth our revenues by segment and product (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Medical segment:
Consoles	$	10,193	$	11,547	$	18,736	$	20,505
Single-procedure disposables:
IVUS	48,265		49,878		94,861		97,845
FM	32,073		28,652		60,917		55,475
Other	10,200		8,944		19,243		16,916
Sub-total medical segment	100,731		99,021		193,757		190,741
Industrial segment	1,874		2,323		3,376		3,834
	$	102,605	$	101,344	$	197,133	$	194,575

The following table sets forth our revenues by geography expressed as dollar amounts (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Revenues (1):
United States	$	51,198	$	49,071	$	96,300	$	92,402
Japan	23,392		27,743		47,285		55,924
Europe, the Middle East and Africa	22,153		18,053		41,613		34,141
Rest of world	5,862		6,477		11,935		12,108
	$	102,605	$	101,344	197,133		$	194,575


(1)	Revenues are attributed to geographies based on the location of the customer, except for shipments to original equipment manufacturers, which are attributed to the country of origin of the equipment distributed.

At June 30, 2014, approximately 48% of our long-lived assets, excluding financial assets, are located in the U.S., approximately 38% are located in Costa Rica, approximately 8% are located in Japan, and approximately 6% are located in our remaining geographies. At December 31, 2013, approximately 49% of our long-lived assets, excluding financial assets, were

located in the U.S., approximately 39% were located in Costa Rica, approximately 8% were located in Japan, and approximately 4% were located in our remaining geographies.

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, goodwill of $150.9 million and $55.1 million, respectively, has been allocated entirely to our medical segment.

7. Income Taxes

Income taxes are determined using an estimated annual effective tax rate applied against income, and then adjusted for the tax impacts of certain discrete items. The Company recorded an income tax benefit of $4.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014, resulting in an effective benefit rate of 28.8%. The effective tax rate differs from the Federal statutory rate of 35.0% primarily due to the expiration of the federal research and development tax credit as of December 31, 2013, foreign income tax rate differentials, nondeductible expenses such as certain stock compensation and acquisition related expenses.

We recorded an income tax benefit of $5.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013, resulting in an income tax benefit rate of 51.0%. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, federal legislation was enacted within the U.S. that retroactively allowed the research and development tax credit for all of 2012 and extended the credit through the twelve months ending December 31, 2013. Because this legislation was enacted in 2013, the full benefit of the credit related to 2012 activities was recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2013. In the absence of the 2012 federal research and development tax credit, our effective benefit tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2013 would have been 41.7%.

Our effective tax benefit rate decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013. The decrease was primarily due to the expiration of the federal research and development tax credit in December 2013 and nondeductible expenses related to stock compensation. In addition to the above noted items, the effective tax rate during the six months ended June 30, 2013 included tax benefits related to the 2012 federal research and development tax credit’s retroactive reinstatement in January 2013.

During the three months ended June 30, 2014, certain stock options were exercised and certain shares related to restricted stock awards vested at times when the Company’s stock price was substantially lower than the fair value of those shares at the time of grant. As a result, the income tax deduction related to such shares is less than the expense previously recognized for book purposes. Such shortfalls reduce additional paid-in capital to the extent windfall tax benefits have been previously recognized. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, no shortfalls reduced additional paid-in capital and $411,000 of the shortfall was included in income tax expense.

The Company evaluates the realizability of the deferred tax assets on a jurisdictional basis at each reporting date. Accounting for income taxes guidance requires that a valuation allowance be established when it is more-likely-than-not that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As part of the evaluation, the Company reviews both positive and negative evidence to determine if a valuation allowance is needed.

In 2013, the Company incurred a net loss, and is not projecting a return to profitability in 2014. As of June 30, 2014, management has evaluated the recoverability of its Federal deferred tax assets, including factors such as a consideration of forecasted operating results, in-process changes in its manufacturing processes, potential tax planning strategies, as well as the period of time that will transpire before the underlying deferred tax assets will expire. Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that it is more likely than not that the underlying deferred tax assets will be utilized prior to their expiration, and therefore continues to believe that the Federal deferred tax assets will be recovered.

Further, during the fourth quarter of 2013, we concluded that it was more likely than not that we would not be able to realize our U.S. state and select foreign deferred tax assets. The Company’s continues to maintain the recorded valuation allowance against our U.S. state and select foreign deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2014.

We will continue to assess the need for a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets by evaluating both positive and negative evidence that may exist. To the extent we establish or change the valuation allowance in a period, the tax effect will generally flow through the statement of operations. In the case of an acquired or merged entity, we will record valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset through purchase accounting procedures as an adjustment to goodwill at the acquisition date, if it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the acquired deferred tax assets will not be realized in the future. Any subsequent change to a valuation allowance established during purchase accounting within the measurement period of the acquisition (not to exceed twelve months) will also be recorded as an adjustment to goodwill, provided that such change relates to new information about the facts and circumstances that existed on the acquisition date.

8. Subsequent Event

On August 7, 2014, we announced our intention to divest our wholly-owned subsidiary, Axsun Technologies, Inc. The divestment could include a sale or winding down of operations, which we expect to complete by the end of 2014.



Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-looking statements: This quarterly report on Form 10-Q (“Quarterly Report”) contains forward-looking statements regarding future events and our future results that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections about the industries in which we operate and the beliefs and assumptions of our management. In some cases, you can identify these “forward-looking statements” by words like “may,” “will,” “should,” "could," “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” "intends" or “continues” or the negative of those words and other comparable words. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:


•	our intentions, beliefs and expectations regarding our expenses, sales, operations and future financial performance;


•	our operating results;


•	our plans for future products and enhancements of existing products;


•	anticipated growth and trends in our business;


•	the timing of and our ability to maintain and obtain regulatory clearances or approvals;


•	our belief that our cash and cash equivalents and short-term available-for-sale investments will be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated cash requirements;


•	our expectations regarding our revenues, customers and distributors;


•	our beliefs and expectations regarding our market penetration and expansion efforts;


•	our expectations regarding the benefits and integration of recently-acquired businesses and our ability to make future acquisitions and successfully integrate any such future-acquired businesses;


•	our anticipated trends and challenges in the markets in which we operate; and


•	our expectations and beliefs regarding and the impact of investigations, claims and litigation.

These statements are not guarantees of future performance or events. Our actual results may differ materially from those discussed here. For a detailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties that could contribute to such differences see the “Risk Factors” section in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Quarterly Report.

Overview

We design, develop, manufacture and commercialize a broad suite of precision guided therapy tools including intravascular ultrasound, or IVUS, and fractional flow reserve, or FFR, products. We believe that these products enhance the diagnosis and treatment of coronary and peripheral vascular disease by improving the efficiency and efficacy of existing diagnostic angiograms and percutaneous coronary interventional, or PCI, and endovascular procedures in the coronary arteries or peripheral arteries and veins. We are facilitating the adoption of functional PCI, in which our FFR technology is used to help determine whether or not a stent is necessary, and IVUS is used as an adjunct to angiography to guide stent placement and optimization. We market our products to physicians, nurses and technicians who perform a variety of endovascular based coronary and peripheral interventional procedures in hospitals and other healthcare settings and to other personnel who make purchasing decisions on behalf of hospitals.

Our products consist of consoles that are marketed as stand-alone units or as units that can be integrated into a variety of hospital-based interventional surgical suites called catheterization laboratories, or cath labs. We have developed customized cath lab versions of these consoles and are developing additional functionality options as part of our cath lab integration initiative. Our consoles have been designed to serve as a multi-modality platform for our phased array and rotational IVUS catheters, FFR pressure and flow wires and image-guided therapy catheters, such as the Pioneer Plus reentry device acquired from Medtronic, Inc., or Medtronic, on August 30, 2013.

Our IVUS products include single-procedure disposable phased array and rotational IVUS imaging catheters, and additional functionality options such as ChromaFlo^® stent apposition analysis. Our FFR offerings can be accessed through our multi-modality platforms, and we also provide FFR-only consoles. Our FFR disposables are single-procedure disposable pressure and flow guide wires used to measure the pressure and flow characteristics of blood around plaque enabling physicians to gauge the plaque's physiological impact on blood flow and pressure. We have developed additional offerings for integration into the platform,

including adenosine-free Instant Wave-Free Ratio FFR, or iFR^®, which received FDA clearance in March 2014 and SyncVision™ which co-registers IVUS with angiography.

On June 17, 2014, we acquired AtheroMed, Inc., or AtheroMed, a privately-held company engaged in the development of atherectomy technology used in the treatment of peripheral artery disease, or PAD. We paid $116.5 million in cash at closing, which amount was partially offset by our acquisition at closing of approximately $1.7 million in cash. In addition, we agreed to pay a cash milestone of $15.0 million if FDA clearance of a premarket 510(k) notification for AtheroMed's second generation Phoenix^® Atherectomy System, or Phoenix, is received on or before November 15, 2014. Furthermore, we may be required to make payments upon reaching certain sales milestones. Phoenix is comprised primarily of an atherectomy catheter with a front-cutting element at its tip and does not require consoles or other capital equipment. The first generation Phoenixatherectomy system has received FDA clearance and is CE marked. We believe our acquisition of AtheroMed will allow us to further diversify our product offerings and to allow us the opportunity to better position ourselves in the peripheral vascular market.

Through Axsun Technologies, Inc., or Axsun, one of our wholly owned subsidiaries, we also develop and manufacture optical monitors for the telecommunications industry, laser and non-laser light sources, optical engines used in medical optical coherence topography, or OCT, imaging systems and advanced photonic components and sub-systems used in spectroscopy and other industrial applications. On August 7, 2014, we announced our intention to divest Axsun. The divestment could include a sale or winding down of the operations, which we expect to complete by the end of 2014.

We have infrastructure in the U.S., Europe, Japan and Costa Rica. Our corporate office is located in San Diego, California. Our products are assembled or manufactured in our manufacturing facilities that are located in Coyol, Costa Rica; Rancho Cordova, California; Billerica, Massachusetts; and Menlo Park, California. We have research and development facilities in the U.S. and Israel. We have sales offices in the U.S. and Japan; sales and distribution offices in Belgium and South Africa; and third-party distribution facilities in Japan.

We have focused on building our domestic and international sales and marketing infrastructure to market our products to physicians and technicians who perform diagnostic angiography, PCI and endovascular procedures in hospitals and to other personnel who make purchasing decisions on behalf of hospitals. We sell our products directly to customers in the United States, Japan, certain European markets and South Africa. We utilize distributors in other geographic areas, which are also involved in product launch planning, education and training, physician support and clinical study management.

At June 30, 2014, we had a worldwide installed base of over approximately 7,400 consoles, excluding our legacy In-Vision Gold systems. We intend to grow and leverage this installed base to drive recurring sales of our single-procedure disposable catheters and guide wires. In the six months ended June 30, 2014, the sale of our single-procedure disposable catheters and guide wires accounted for $155.8 million, or 80.4% of our medical segment revenues, a $2.5 million, or 1.6% increase from the six months ended June 30, 2013, in which the sale of our single-procedure disposable catheters and guide wires accounted for $153.3 million, or 80.4% of our medical segment revenues.

In the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, 44.2% and 45.1%, respectively, of our revenues and 22.7% and 21.6%, respectively, of our operating expenses were denominated in various non-U.S. dollar currencies, primarily the Japanese yen, or yen, and the euro. We expect that a significant portion of our revenue and operating expenses will continue to be denominated in non-U.S. dollar currencies. As a result, we are subject to risks related to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, which could affect our operating results in the future. If our yen or euro denominated sales exceed our yen or euro denominated costs, and the U.S. dollar strengthens relative to the yen or the euro, there is an adverse effect on our results of operations. Conversely, if the U.S. dollar weakens relative to the yen or the euro, there is a positive effect on our results of operations. For example, the average exchange rate of one U.S. dollar to yen increased 9.5% from 93.8 in the six months ended June 30, 2013 to 102.7 in the six months ended June 30, 2014, which resulted in a net negative impact to our operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2014 in the amount of approximately $2.8 million as compared to the comparable period in the prior year. On the other hand, the average exchange rate of one U.S. dollar to the euro increased 4.5% from 1.31 in the six months ended June 30, 2013 to 1.37 in the six months ended June 30, 2014. This resulted in a net positive impact to our operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2014 in the amount of approximately $1.0 million as compared to the comparable period in the prior year. The overall impact from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations of both the yen and the euro was a net negative impact of $1.8 million.

We use third-party manufacturing partners in certain areas of our manufacturing processes. We perform incoming inspection on all components manufactured by third parties and test the final products to assure quality control. We do not carry significant inventories of transducers or substrates. If we had to change suppliers, we expect that it would take 6 to 24 months to identify appropriate suppliers, complete design work and undertake the necessary inspections and testing before the new transducers and substrates would be available.

External Factors

In September 2009, published findings from the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel

Evaluation, or FAME, study demonstrated that patients in the study with multi-vessel coronary artery disease who were treated by FFR guidance had a 34% reduction in death and myocardial infarction (heart attack) compared to angiographic guidance alone. In August 2012, the results of the Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI vs. Medical Therapy in Stable Coronary Disease, or FAME 2, study were published in the New England Journal of Medicine. FAME 2 showed that patients receiving PCI with proven ischemia by FFR had 66% fewer primary endpoint events including death, myocardial infarction and urgent revascularization's (e.g. coronary bypass) than those patients treated with optimal medical therapy alone. We believe these findings will continue to drive the growth and adoption of our disposable FFR wire products.

With respect to IVUS, two-year data released in 2013 from the ADAPT-DES study (Assessment of Platelet Therapy with Drug-Eluting Stents), the largest study conducted with IVUS guidance to date, indicated IVUS guidance was associated with reductions in certain serious patient events, including stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction, and that IVUS guidance was associated with a change in procedure 74% of the time. These data suggest that IVUS guidance can play an important role in helping to improve patient outcomes.

The economic conditions in many countries and regions where we generate our revenues remain uncertain. If our customers do not obtain or do not have access to the necessary capital to operate their businesses, or are otherwise adversely affected by any deterioration in national and worldwide economic conditions, this could result in reductions in the sales of our products, longer sales cycles and slower adoption of new technologies by our customers, which would materially and adversely affect our business. In addition, our customers’ and suppliers’ liquidity, capital resources and credit may be adversely affected by their relative ability or inability to obtain capital and credit, which could adversely affect our ability to collect on our outstanding invoices and lengthen our collection cycles, or limit our timely access to important sources of raw materials necessary for the manufacture of our consoles and catheters.

In addition, the political unrest in certain regions of the world may have adverse consequences to the global economy or to our customers in certain regions, which could negatively impact our business. Uncertainty about future economic conditions may make it more difficult for us to forecast operating results and to make decisions about future investments. For further discussion, see “Risk Factors—General national and worldwide economic conditions may materially and adversely affect our financial performance and results of operations.”

Financial Operations Overview

The following is a description of the primary components of our revenue and expenses.

Revenues. We derive our revenues from two reportable segments: medical and industrial. Our medical segment represents our core business, in which we derive revenues primarily from the sale of our consoles and single-procedure disposables. Our industrial segment derives revenues related to the sales of Axsun’s micro-optical spectrometers and optical channel monitors to telecommunication and other industrial companies. In the six months ended June 30, 2014, we generated $197.1 million of revenues which is comprised of $193.8 million from our medical segment and $3.4 million from our industrial segment. We experienced increases in revenues related to FFR single-procedure disposables and decrease in revenues related to consoles and IVUS single-procedure disposables in the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared with the same period in the prior year. In the six months ended June 30, 2014, 9.7% of our medical segment revenues were derived from the sale of our consoles, 49.0% from IVUS single-procedure disposables and 31.4% from FFR single-procedure disposables as compared with 10.8% from consoles, 51.3% from IVUS single-procedure disposables and 29.1% from FFR single-procedure disposables in the same period in the prior year. Other revenues consist primarily of service and maintenance revenues, shipping and handling revenues, sales of distributed products, sales of medical products manufactured by our Axsun subsidiary, spare parts sales, and license fees.

We expect to continue experiencing variability in our quarterly revenues from console sales due in part to the timing of hospital capital equipment purchasing decisions. Further, we expect variability of our revenues based on the timing of our new product introductions, which may cause our customers to delay their purchasing decisions until the new products are commercially available.

Our medical segment sales are generated by our direct sales representatives or through independent distributors and are shipped throughout the world from facilities in the United States, Belgium, Japan and South Africa. Our industrial segment sales are generated by our direct sales representatives or through independent distributors and these products are shipped primarily to telecommunications and industrial companies domestically and abroad from the United States.

Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues consists primarily of material costs for the products that we sell and other costs associated with our manufacturing process, such as personnel costs, rent, depreciation related to our manufacturing equipment and utilities. In addition, cost of revenues includes depreciation of company-owned consoles, royalty expenses for licensed technologies included in our products, service costs, provisions for warranty, distribution, freight and packaging costs and stock-based compensation expense

related to manufacturing employees. We expect a trend of improvement in our gross margin for IVUS and FFR products if we are successful in our ongoing efforts to streamline and improve our manufacturing processes, increase production volumes and transition certain manufacturing operations to Costa Rica.

Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and commissions and other related costs for personnel serving the sales, administrative and marketing functions. Other costs include stock-based compensation expense, professional fees for legal and accounting services, travel and entertainment expenses, facility costs, trade show, training and other promotional expenses. Due to ongoing litigation, legal expenses tend to be somewhat unpredictable in their timing and amount. We expect that our selling, general and administrative expenses will increase as we continue to expand our sales force and marketing efforts and invest in the necessary infrastructure to support our continued growth.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses for personnel, consultants, prototype materials, clinical studies, depreciation, regulatory filing fees, certain legal costs related to our intellectual property and stock-based compensation expense. We expense research and development costs as incurred. Due to product development timelines, research and development costs tend to be distributed unevenly between the periods. We expect our research and development expenses to increase as we continue to develop our products and technologies.

Amortization of Intangibles. We amortize intangible assets, consisting of our developed technology, licenses, customer relationships, patents and trademarks, and covenants-not-to-compete, using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of up to 20 years. These assets are regularly tested for impairment and abandonment.

Acquisition-Related Items. Acquisition-related items consists of acquisition transaction costs, subsequent accretion of and revision, if any, to the fair value of the contingent consideration related to acquisitions and other expenses directly associated with acquisitions.

Restructuring Charges. Restructuring charges consist of employee termination benefits, asset impairments and other related charges associated with restructuring activities.

Interest Income. Interest income is comprised of interest income earned from our cash and cash equivalents and our short-term and long-term available-for-sale investments.

Interest Expense. Interest expense is comprised of interest expense related to our convertible senior notes, including coupon interest, accretion of debt discount, and amortization of issuance costs, and interest expense related to the long-term debt acquired with Sync-Rx, offset by interest capitalization related to our global Enterprise Resource Planning, or ERP, system implementation, before the ERP system was placed into service in the fourth quarter of 2013.

Exchange Rate Gain (Loss). Exchange rate gain (loss) is comprised of foreign currency transaction and remeasurement gains and losses, and the effect of changes in value and net settlements of our foreign exchange forward contracts.

Provision for Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate is a blended rate resulting from the composition of taxable income in the global jurisdictions in which we conduct business. We apply the “with and without method—direct effects only”, in accordance with authoritative guidance, with respect to recognition of stock option excess tax benefits within stockholders equity (additional paid in capital). Therefore, the provision for domestic income taxes is determined utilizing projected federal and state taxable income before the application of deductible excess tax benefits attributable to stock option exercises.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth items derived from our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, presented as a percentage of revenues, with the dollar and percentage change year over year (in thousands except for percentages):



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2014										Changes
	2014					2013					$			%
Revenues	$	102,605		100.0	%	$	101,344		100.0	%	$	1,261		1.2	%
Cost of revenues, excluding amortization of intangibles	37,711			36.8		36,039			35.6		(1,672		)	(4.6	)
Gross profit	64,894			63.2		65,305			64.4		(411		)	(0.6	)
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative	49,353			48.1		45,734			45.1		(3,619		)	(7.9	)
Research and development	13,700			13.4		17,954			17.7		4,254			23.7
Amortization of intangibles	1,818			1.8		820			0.8		(998		)	(121.7	)
Acquisition-related items	(6,441		)	(6.3	)	911			0.9		7,352			807.0
Restructuring charges	(841		)	(0.8	)	—			—		841			—
Total operating expenses	57,589			56.1		65,419			64.6		7,830			12.0
Operating income (loss)	7,305			7.1		(114		)	(0.1	)	7,419			6,507.9
Interest income	281			0.3		305			0.3		(24		)	(7.9	)
Interest expense	(7,320		)	(7.1	)	(6,607		)	(6.5	)	(713		)	(10.8	)
Exchange rate gain (loss)	(13		)	—		(301		)	(0.3	)	288			95.7
Other, net	14			—		2,279			2.2		(2,265		)	(99.4	)
Income (loss) before income tax	267			0.3		(4,438		)	(4.4	)	4,705			106.0
Income tax benefit	(15		)	0.1		(2,050		)	(2.0	)	(2,035		)	(99.3	)
Net income (loss)	$	282		0.3	%	$	(2,388	)	(2.4	)%	$	2,670		111.8	%

The following table sets forth items derived from our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, presented as a percentage of revenues, with the dollar and percentage change year over year (in thousands except for percentages):



	Six Months Ended June 30,										Changes
	2014					2013					$			%
Revenues	$	197,133		100.0	%	$	194,575		100.0	%	$	2,558		1.3	%
Cost of revenues, excluding amortization of intangibles	72,794			36.9		69,166			35.5		(3,628		)	(5.2	)
Gross profit	124,339			63.1		125,409			64.5		(1,070		)	(0.9	)
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative	99,664			50.6		89,563			46.0		(10,101		)	(11.3	)
Research and development	27,657			14.0		33,605			17.3		5,948			17.7
Amortization of intangibles	3,601			1.8		1,654			0.9		(1,947		)	(117.7	)
Acquisition-related items	(5,405		)	(2.7	)	2,489			1.3		7,894			317.2
Restructuring charges	32			—		—			—		(32		)	—
Total operating expenses	125,549			63.7		127,311			65.4		1,762			1.4
Operating loss	(1,210		)	(0.6	)	(1,902		)	(1.0	)	692			(36.4	)
Interest income	596			0.3		643			0.3		(47		)	(7.3	)
Interest expense	(14,498		)	(7.4	)	(13,152		)	(6.8	)	(1,346		)	10.2
Exchange rate gain (loss)	71			—		(1,079		)	(0.6	)	1,150			(106.6	)
Other, net	124			0.1		4,177			2.1		(4,053		)	(97.0	)
Loss before income tax	(14,917		)	(7.6	)	(11,313		)	(5.8	)	(3,604		)	31.9
Income tax benefit	(4,295		)	(2.2	)	(5,764		)	(3.0	)	(1,469		)	25.5
Net loss	$	(10,622	)	(5.4	)%	$	(5,549	)	(2.9	)%	$	(5,073	)	91.4	%

The following table sets forth our revenues by segment and product (in thousands) and the changes in revenues between the specified periods:



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Changes					Six Months Ended June 30,				Changes
	2014		2013		$			%		2014		2013		$			%
Medical segment:
Consoles	$	10,193	$	11,547	$	(1,354	)	(11.7	)%	$	18,736	$	20,505	$	(1,769	)	(8.6	)%
Single-procedure disposables:
IVUS	48,265		49,878		(1,613		)	(3.2	)%	94,861		97,845		(2,984		)	(3.0	)%
FFR	32,073		28,652		3,421			11.9	%	60,917		55,475		5,442			9.8	%
Other	10,200		8,944		1,256			14.0	%	19,243		16,916		2,327			13.8	%
Sub-total medical segment	100,731		99,021		1,710			1.7	%	193,757		190,741		3,016			1.6	%
Industrial segment	1,874		2,323		(449		)	(19.3	)%	3,376		3,834		(458		)	(11.9	)%
	$	102,605	$	101,344	$	1,261		1.2	%	$	197,133	$	194,575	$	2,558		1.3	%

The following table sets forth our revenues by geographic area (in thousands) and the changes in revenues in the specified periods:



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Changes					Six Months Ended June 30,				Changes
	2014		2013		$			%		2014		2013		$			%
Revenue (1):
United States	$	51,198	$	49,071	$	2,127		4.3	%	$	96,300	$	92,402	$	3,898		4.2	%
Japan	23,392		27,743		(4,351		)	(15.7	)%	47,285		55,924		(8,639		)	(15.4	)%
Europe, the Middle East and Africa	22,153		18,053		4,100			22.7	%	41,613		34,141		7,472			21.9	%
Rest of world	5,862		6,477		(615		)	(9.5	)%	11,935		12,108		(173		)	(1.4	)%
	$	102,605	$	101,344	$	1,261		1.2	%	$	197,133	$	194,575	2,558			1.3	%


(1)	Revenues are attributed to geographies based on the location of the customer, except for shipments to original equipment manufacturers, which are attributed to the country of origin of the equipment distributed.

Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

Revenues. Overall, the medical segment revenue in the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared with the three months ended June 30, 2013 increased slightly driven by increased demand for our FFR disposable products and growth in our EMEIA (Europe, Middle East, India & Africa) markets. The decrease in IVUS disposable revenues was due to declines in market share, partially offset by increased revenue from the sale of products from the Pioneer Plus re-entry catheter product line which was acquired from Medtronic in August 2013. The increase in other revenues is primarily due to higher sales of service contracts and third-party products.

We recognized year-over-year increases in revenues across all our key geographic markets except for Japan. The decrease in Japan is partially due to the unfavorable impact of approximately $1.2 million of foreign currency exchange rates related to the yen, a decreased reimbursement rate and a decrease in IVUS disposable sales in coronary procedures due to a decline in market share.

Cost of Revenues. The increase in the cost of revenues in the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared with the three months ended June 30, 2013 was due to higher sales volume and a provision for royalties. Gross margin was 63.2% of revenues in three months ended June 30, 2014, decreasing from 64.4% of revenues in the three months ended June 30, 2013. This unfavorable change in gross margin was primarily the result of higher royalties and duplicate overhead costs as we transition certain manufacturing operations to Costa Rica.

Selling, General and Administrative. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared with the three months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily due to the higher variable costs for U.S. sales driven by higher sales volumes, increased headcount in the sales organization in the U.S. and Europe, increased legal expense related to litigation matters and business development efforts, increased employee short-term and long-term incentive expense and increased facility expense related to our new corporate headquarters in San Diego, California, that we began to occupy in the third quarter of 2013.

Research and Development. The decrease in research and development expenses in the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared with the three months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily due to the discontinuation of research and development projects as part of our restructuring efforts.

Amortization of Intangibles. The increase in amortization of intangibles in the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared with the three months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily due to the amortization of intangible assets received from the Pioneer transaction in August 2013, the commencement of amortization of the Crux intangible asset related to the IVC filter technology in December 2013 and amortization of intangibles acquired with the acquisition of AtheroMed in June 2014.

Acquisition-Related Items. Acquisition-related items during the three months ended June 30, 2014 consisted primarily of a benefit of $7.0 million related to a change in fair value assumptions of the contingent consideration associated with the Crux and the AtheroMed acquisitions. This adjustment was partially offset by accretion of contingent consideration and $629,000 in acquisition costs related to the AtheroMed acquisition that closed in June 2014. The acquisition-related items during the three months ended June 30, 2013 consist of transaction costs related to the Sync-Rx and Crux acquisitions and the change in fair value of the contingent consideration related to the Crux acquisition primarily as a result of the passage of time.

Restructuring Charges. Restructuring income during the three months ended June 30, 2014 consisted primarily of a settlement of a previously accrued contract termination settlement with a vendor at an amount $880,000 less than originally estimated.

Interest Income. The interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013 remains consistent.

Interest Expense. Interest expense during the three months ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013 was primarily related to interest and accretion of debt discount incurred on the convertible debt issued in December 2012 ($460 million aggregate principal amount) and the convertible debt issued in September 2010 ($25 million aggregate principal amount). The increase in interest expense is due to the accretion of the debt discount.

Exchange Rate Gain (Loss). During the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the impact of fluctuations in exchange rates was reduced by our 2014 hedging practices. Through our hedging program, we are able to reduce the volatility of our exchange rate gains and losses resulting from the remeasurement of our intercompany receivable balances and non-functional currency transactions at current exchange rates.

Other. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, the Company's other income (expense) was minimal. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, we recognized $2.2 million of gains in connection with the sales of other long-term investments, which had been accounted for using the cost method.

Income Tax (Benefit) Expense. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, we recognized income tax benefit of $15,000 compared to an income tax benefit of $2.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2013. Our effective tax benefit rate decreased for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013. The decrease was primarily due to the expiration of the federal research and development tax credit in December 2013 and nondeductible expenses related to stock compensation. In addition to the above noted items, the effective tax rate during the three months ended June 30, 2013 included tax benefits related to the 2012 federal research and development tax credit’s retroactive reinstatement in January 2013.

Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

Revenues. Overall, the increase in medical segment revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2013 was driven by increased demand for our disposable products, largely offset by the net $2.8 million unfavorable impact of foreign currency exchange rates related primarily to the yen. The increases in FFR disposable revenues were primarily due to the increased adoption of the technology based on clinical study data, partially offset by unfavorable impacts of foreign currency exchange rates related primarily to the yen. The decrease in IVUS disposable revenues was due to the unfavorable impact of foreign currency exchange rates related primarily to the yen and a decline in market share in Japan, partially offset by increased revenue from the sale of products from the Pioneer Plus re-entry catheter product line which was acquired from Medtronic in August 2013. The increase in other revenues is primarily due to higher sales of service contracts and third-party products.

We recognized year-over-year increases in revenues across all our key geographic markets except for Japan. The decrease in Japan is primarily due to the unfavorable impact of approximately $4.5 million of foreign currency exchange rates related to the yen, a decline in the reimbursement rate and a decrease in IVUS disposable sales in coronary procedures due to a decline in market share.

Cost of Revenues. The increase in the cost of revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily due to higher sales volume. Gross margin was 63.1% of revenues in six months ended June 30, 2014, decreasing from 64.5% of revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2013. This unfavorable change in gross margin was primarily the result of the unfavorable impacts of foreign exchange rates related to the yen, royalties and duplicate overhead costs as we transition certain manufacturing operations to Costa Rica.

Selling, General and Administrative. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared with the six months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily due to the higher variable costs for U.S. sales driven by higher sales volumes, increased headcount in the sales organization in the U.S. and Europe, increased legal expense related to litigation matters and business development efforts, increased employee short-term and long-term incentive expense and increased facility expense related to our new corporate headquarters in San Diego, California, that we began to occupy in the third quarter of 2013.

Research and Development. The decrease in research and development expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily due to the discontinuation of in-process research and development projects as part of our restructuring efforts.

Amortization of Intangibles. The increase in amortization of intangibles in the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared with the six months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily due to the amortization of intangible assets received from the Pioneer transaction in August 2013, the commencement of amortization of the Crux intangible asset related to the IVC filter technology in December 2013 and amortization of developed technology acquired with the June 2014 acquisition of AtheroMed.

Acquisition-Related Items. Acquisition-related items during the six months ended June 30, 2014 consisted primarily of a benefit of $6.2 million related to the change in fair value of the contingent consideration associated with the Crux acquisition. This adjustment was partially offset by the accretion of contingent consideration of both the Crux and AtheroMed acquisitions and $800,000 of acquisition costs related to the AtheroMed acquisition that closed in June 2014 and the Sync-Rx acquisition. The acquisition-related items during the six months ended June 30, 2013 consist of transaction costs related to the Sync-Rx and Crux acquisitions and the change in fair value of the contingent consideration related to the Crux acquisition primarily as a result of the passage of time.

Restructuring Charges. Restructuring charges during the six months ended June 30, 2014 consisted primarily of $818,000 of tangible and intangible asset impairments related to the discontinuation of research and development programs offset by a settlement of a previously accrued contract termination settlement with a vendor at an amount $880,000 less than originally estimated.

Interest Income. The interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 remains consistent.

Interest Expense. Interest expense during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013 was primarily related to interest and accretion of debt discount incurred on the convertible debt issued in December 2012 ($460 million aggregate principal amount) and the convertible debt issued in September 2010 ($25 million aggregate principal amount). The increase in interest expense is due to the accretion of the debt discount.

Exchange Rate Gain (Loss). During the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the impact of fluctuations in exchange rates was significantly reduced by our 2014 hedging practices. Through our hedging program, we are able to reduce the volatility of our exchange rate gains and losses resulting from the remeasurement of our intercompany receivable balances and non-functional currency transactions at current exchange rates.

Other. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company's other income (expense) was minimal. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we recognized $4.1 million of gains in connection with the sales of other long-term investments, which had been accounted for using the cost method.

Income Tax (Benefit) Expense. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we recognized income tax benefit of $4.3 million compared to an income tax benefit of $5.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013. Our effective tax benefit rate decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013. The decrease was primarily due to the expiration of the federal research and development tax credit in December 2013 and nondeductible expenses related to stock compensation. In addition to the above noted items, the effective tax rate during the six months ended June 30, 2013 included tax benefits related to the 2012 federal research and development tax credit’s retroactive reinstatement in January 2013.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources of Liquidity

Historically, our sources of cash have included:


•	issuance of equity and debt securities, including underwritten public offerings of our common stock and convertible bonds, cash generated from the exercise of stock options and participation in our employee stock purchase plan;


•	cash generated from operations, primarily from product sales; and


•	interest income.

Our historical cash outflows have primarily been associated with:


•	cash used for operating activities such as the purchase and growth of inventory, expansion of our sales and marketing and research and development infrastructure and other working capital needs;


•	expenditures related to increasing our manufacturing capacity and improving our manufacturing efficiency;


•	capital expenditures related to the acquisition of equipment that we own and place at our customer premises and other fixed assets;


•	cash used to repay our debt obligations and related interest expense;


•	cash used for acquisitions; and


•	cash used to repurchase outstanding common stock.

Fluctuations in our working capital due to timing differences of our cash receipts and cash disbursements also impact our cash inflows and outflows.

On September 20, 2010, we issued $115.0 million principal amount of 2.875% Notes due 2015, or the 2015 Notes, in an offering registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. To hedge against potential dilution upon conversion of the 2015 Notes, we purchased call options on our common stock. In addition, to reduce the cost of the hedge, under separate transactions we sold warrants. We received proceeds of $100.5 million from issuance of the 2015 Notes, net of issuance costs ($4.5 million) and net payments related to our hedge transactions ($10.0 million).

On December 5, 2012, we issued $460.0 million principal amount of 1.75% Notes due 2017, or the 2017 Notes, in an offering registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. To hedge against potential dilution upon conversion of the 2017 Notes, we purchased call options on our common stock. In addition, to reduce the cost of the hedge, under separate transactions we sold warrants. We received proceeds of $409.3 million from the issuance of the 2017 Notes, net of issuance costs ($14.6 million) and net payments related to our hedge transactions ($36.1 million).

Concurrently with the issuance of the 2017 Notes, we retired $90.0 million of the 2015 Notes and retired the proportionate portion of the warrants and call options related to the 2015 Notes. We paid $104.9 million to repurchase the $90.0 million face value of the 2015 Notes and received a net amount of $3.6 million related to the retirement of the proportionate warrants and call options associated with the 2015 Notes.

At June 30, 2014, our cash and cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments totaled $241.7 million. We invest our excess funds in U.S. government securities, corporate fixed income securities, commercial paper, certificates of deposit and money market funds.

At June 30, 2014, our accumulated deficit was $127.0 million. Since inception, we have generated significant operating losses. During the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, we achieved full years of profitability. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, our business used approximately $1.9 million of cash related to operating activities. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, our business provided $1.5 million in cash related to operating activities.

Cash Flows (in thousands)



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$	(1,941	)	$	1,527
Net cash used in investing activities	(55,921		)	(32,149		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	6,623			2,883
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	262			(1,136		)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	$	(50,977	)	$	(28,875	)

Cash Flows (used in) provided by Operating Activities. Cash used in operating activities of $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 reflected our net loss of $10.6 million, adjusted for non-cash expenses, consisting primarily of $17.1 million of depreciation and amortization, including amortization or accretion of investment premium or discount, $7.5 million of stock-based compensation expense, $9.9 million of accretion of debt discount on convertible notes and other long term liabilities, $1.0 million of deferred income taxes and $818,000 of asset impairment primarily related to restructuring activities offset by $6.2 million for the net reduction in the contingent consideration liability primarily related to the Crux acquisition. An additional source of cash included an increase in accrued expenses including accrued compensation of $3.6 million. Uses of cash included an increase of accounts receivable of $2.3 million, increased inventories of $8.5 million, increases in prepaid expenses and other assets of $5.6 million and decreases in accounts payable of $7.6 million.

Cash provided by operating activities of $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 reflected our net loss of $5.5 million, adjusted for non-cash expenses, consisting primarily of $13.6 million of depreciation and amortization, including amortization or accretion of investment premium or discount, $7.8 million of stock-based compensation expense, $9.3 million of accretion of debt discount on convertible notes and other long term liabilities, and $1.7 million for the accretion of the contingent consideration related to the Crux acquisition. Uses of cash included an increase in accounts receivable of $5.5 million and prepaid expenses and other assets of $11.1 million, decreases in accounts payable of $6.2 million and other accrued liabilities of $3.9 million and an increase in inventories of $6.8 million related to our expected sales demand.

Cash Flows used in Investing Activities. Cash used in investing activities was $55.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014, resulting from cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, of $114.8 million, approximately $120.5 million used to purchase short-term and long-term available-for-sale investments offset by $198.6 million from the sale or maturity of available-for-sale investments, $14.7 million used for capital expenditures, including purchases of medical diagnostic equipment, manufacturing equipment and information technology systems, and $4.9 million used for other long-term assets and intangible asset purchases.

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, $154.9 million was used to purchase short-term and long-term available-for-sale securities and $18.5 million was used for capital expenditures, including purchases of medical diagnostic equipment, manufacturing equipment and ERP system implementation. These purchases were partially offset by $139.5 million from the sale or maturity of investments.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities. Cash provided by financing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2014 of $6.6 million consisted primarily of $7.7 million from exercises of common stock options and $1.9 million from the sale of common stock under our employee stock purchase plan offset by $2.9 million used for the Crux milestone payment.

Cash provided by financing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2013 consisted primarily of $1.2 million from exercises of common stock options and $1.7 million from the sale of common stock under our employee stock purchase plan.

Future Liquidity Needs

At June 30, 2014, we believe our current cash and cash equivalents and our available-for-sale investments will be sufficient to fund working capital requirements, debt service requirements, capital expenditures and operations for at least the next 12 months. We intend to retain any future earnings to support operations and to finance the growth and development of our business, and we do not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future.

Our future liquidity and capital requirements will be influenced by numerous factors, including the extent and duration of any future operating losses, the level and timing of future sales and expenditures, the results and scope of ongoing research and product development programs, working capital required to support our sales growth, funds required to service our debt, the receipt of and time required to obtain regulatory clearances and approvals, our sales and marketing programs, our need for infrastructure to support our sales growth, the continuing acceptance of our products in the marketplace, competing technologies and changes in the market and regulatory environment and cash that may be required to settle our foreign currency hedges.

Our ability to fund our longer-term cash needs is subject to various risks, many of which are beyond our control—See “Risk Factors—We may require significant additional capital to pursue our growth strategy, and our failure to raise capital when needed could prevent us from executing our growth strategy.” Should we require additional funding, such as additional capital investments, we may need to raise the required additional funds through bank borrowings or public or private sales of debt or equity securities. We cannot assure that such funding will be available in needed quantities or on terms favorable to us, if at all.

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The

preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our critical accounting policies and estimates. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Our critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In conjunction with the sale of our products in the ordinary course of business, we provide standard indemnification to business partners and customers for losses suffered or incurred for patent, copyright or any other intellectual property infringement claims by any third parties with respect to our products. The term of these indemnification arrangements is generally perpetual. The maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these agreements is unlimited. At June 30, 2014, we have not incurred any costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification arrangements.

Contractual Obligations

At June 30, 2014, there were no additional material contractual obligations other than the items detailed in Note 4 - “Commitments and Contingencies–Purchase Commitments” and those disclosed in Part II, Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Contractual Obligations" of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.



Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk represents the risk of changes in the value of market risk sensitive instruments caused by fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity prices. Changes in these factors could cause fluctuations in our results of operations and cash flows. In the ordinary course of business, we are exposed to interest rate and foreign exchange risk. Fluctuations in interest rates and the rate of exchange between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies, primarily the Japanese yen, or yen and the euro, could adversely affect our financial results.

We do not carry significant inventory of transducers or substrates. If we had to change suppliers, we expect that it would take 6 to 24 months to identify appropriate suppliers, complete design work and undertake the necessary inspections and testing before the new transducers and substrates would be available.

Interest Rate Risk

Our exposure to interest rate risk at June 30, 2014 is related to the investment of our excess cash into highly liquid financial investments as well as our convertible debt which has a fixed rate. Fixed rate investments and borrowings may have their fair market value adversely impacted from changes in interest rates.

At June 30, 2014, we held $241.7 million in cash and cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments of which $206.2 million consisted of highly liquid financial investments with original final maturities of one year or less and the remaining amount was long-term available-for-sale investments with original final maturities over one year. If interest rates were to increase instantaneously and uniformly by 10 basis points, compared to interest rates as of June 30, 2014, the fair market value of our investment portfolio would decrease by approximately $119,000.

We invest in cash and cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments in accordance with our investment policy. The primary objectives of our investment policy are to preserve principal, maintain proper liquidity to meet operating needs and maximize yields consistent with our tolerance for investment risk. Our investment policy specifies credit quality standards for our investments. We do not hold mortgage-backed securities.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

to 102.7 in the six months ended June 30, 2014, which resulted in a net negative impact to our operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2014 in the amount of approximately $2.8 million as compared to the comparable period in the prior year. On the other hand, the average exchange rate of one U.S. dollar to the euro increased 4.5% from 1.31 in the six months ended June 30, 2013 to 1.37 in the six months ended June 30, 2014. This resulted in a net positive impact to our operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2014 in the amount of approximately $1.0 million as compared to the comparable period in the prior year. The overall impact from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations of both the yen and the euro was a net negative impact of $1.8 million.

We enter into derivative financial instruments, principally forward contracts, to manage a portion of the foreign currency risk related to transactions in non-functional currencies. We record derivative financial instruments as either assets or liabilities in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and measure them at fair value. Certain of the derivative instruments we use to mitigate this exposure are not designated for hedge accounting treatment, and as a result, changes in their fair values are recorded in exchange rate gain (loss) in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations. These contracts contain net settlement features. If we experience unfavorable changes in foreign exchange rates, we may be required to use significant amounts of cash to settle the transactions which may adversely affect the operating results that we report with respect to the corresponding period.

We hedge forecasted intercompany inventory transactions that are denominated in yen and euro. Forward contracts are used to hedge forecasted intercompany inventory transactions over specific time periods. These forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges and have maturity dates of up to 15 months. Changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges, excluding time value of the hedges which is recorded as interest expense, are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), or AOCI, within stockholders' equity. Once the underlying hedged transaction occurs, we de-designate the derivative, cease to apply hedge accounting treatment to the transaction, reclassify the gain or loss recorded to date from AOCI into cost of sales, and record any further gains or losses to exchange rate gain (loss). We evaluate effectiveness at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis. To the extent we experience ineffectiveness in our hedges, the gains or losses accumulated in other comprehensive income associated with the ineffective portion of the hedge are reclassified immediately into exchange rate gain (loss). We adjust the level and use of derivatives as soon as practicable after learning that an exposure has changed. We review all exposures on derivative positions on a regular basis.

We are exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the banks with which we transact foreign currency contracts. We currently hold foreign exchange forward contracts with two counterparties. Our overall risk of loss in the event of a counterparty default is limited to the amount of any unrealized gains on outstanding contracts (i.e., those contracts that have a positive fair value) at the date of default. We manage this credit risk by executing foreign currency contracts with counterparties that meet our minimum requirements, and monitoring the credit ratings of our counterparties on a periodic basis. As of June 30, 2014, we had no credit exposure from nonperformance of foreign exchange contract counterparties.

Market Price Sensitive Instruments

In order to reduce the potential equity dilution that would result upon conversion of our convertible senior notes, we entered into convertible note hedge transactions, or the Hedge, entitling us to purchase up to 14 million shares of our common stock at an initial strike price of $32.83 per share and 850,000 shares of common stock at an initial strike price of $29.64 per share, subject to adjustments. Upon conversion of the convertible senior notes, the Hedge is expected to reduce the equity dilution if the daily volume-weighted average price per share of our common stock exceeds the strike price of the Hedge. We also entered into warrant transactions with the counterparties of the Hedge entitling them to acquire up to 14 million shares of our common stock at an initial strike price of $37.59 and 850,000 shares of our common stock at an initial strike price of $34.88 per share, subject to adjustments. The warrant transactions could have a dilutive effect on our earnings per share to the extent that the price of our common stock during a given measurement period (the quarter or year to date period) at maturity of the warrants exceeds the strike price of the warrants. In addition, non-performance by the counterparties under the Hedge would potentially expose us to dilution of our common stock to the extent our stock price exceeds the conversion price. See Note 3 “Financial Statement Details—Debt” for additional information.



Item 4.	Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer have concluded that, at June 30, 2014, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, we carried out an evaluation of any potential changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2014 that our certifying officers concluded materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION



Item 1.	Legal Proceedings

The information set forth under Note 4 “Commitments and Contingencies – Litigation” to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, included in Part I, Item 1 of this Report, is incorporated herein by reference.



Item 1A.	Risk Factors

The risk factors set forth below with an asterisk (*) next to the title contain changes to the description of the risk factors previously disclosed in Item 1A to our annual report on Form 10-K.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

*We have only achieved profitability in 2010, 2011 and 2012 and are not projecting a return to profitability in 2014.We cannot assure you that we will achieve and sustain profitability in any future periods.

We were formed in January 2000 and have been profitable, on a full-year basis, only in 2010, 2011 and 2012 and the Company is not projecting a return to profitability in 2014. To the extent that we are able to increase revenues, we expect our operating expenses will also increase as we expand our business to meet anticipated growing demand for our products, devote resources to our sales, marketing and research and development activities and satisfy our debt service obligations. If we are unable to increase our revenues or reduce our cost of revenues and our operating expenses, we may not achieve profitability in the future. We expect to experience quarterly fluctuations in our revenues due to the timing of capital purchases by our customers and to a lesser degree the seasonality of disposable consumption by our customers. Additionally, expenses will fluctuate as we make future investments in research and development, selling and marketing and general and administrative activities, including as a result of new product introductions, transitioning from distributor arrangements to a direct sales force in different markets, satisfying our debt service obligations, and fund our litigation costs. This will cause us to experience variability in our reported earnings and losses in future periods. You should not rely on our operating results for any prior quarterly or annual period as an indication of our future operating performance.

We are dependent on the success of our consoles and catheters and cannot be certain that IVUS and FFR technology or our IVUS and FFR products will achieve the broad acceptance necessary for us to sustain a profitable business.

Our revenues are primarily derived from sales of our IVUS and FFR products, which include our multi-modality consoles and our single-procedure disposable catheters and fractional flow reserve wires. IVUS technology is widely used in Japan for determining the placement of stents in patients with coronary disease but the penetration rate in the United States and Europe for the same type of procedure is relatively low. Our wires are used to measure the pressure and flow characteristics of blood around plaque, enabling physicians to gauge the physiological impact of blood flow and pressure. We expect that sales of our IVUS and FFR products will continue to account for a majority of our revenues for the foreseeable future, however it is difficult to predict the penetration and future growth rate (if any) or size of the market for IVUS and FFR technology. The expansion of the IVUS and FFR markets depends on a number of factors, such as:


•	physicians accepting the benefits of the use of IVUS and FFR in conjunction with angiography;


•	physician experience with IVUS and FFR products either used alone or jointly used in a single percutaneous coronary intervention, or PCI;


•	the availability of training necessary for proficient use of IVUS and FFR products, as well as willingness by physicians to participate in such training;


•	the additional procedure time required for use of IVUS and FFR compared to the perceived benefits;


•	the perceived risks generally associated with the use of our products and procedures, especially our new products and procedures;


•	the placement of our products in treatment guidelines published by leading medical organizations;


•	the availability of alternative treatments or procedures that are perceived to be or are more effective, safer, easier to use or less costly than IVUS and FFR technology;


•	hospitals' willingness, and having sufficient budgets, to purchase our IVUS and FFR products;


•	the size and growth rate of the PCI market in the major geographies in which we operate;


•	the availability of adequate reimbursement in the United States and other countries; and


•	the success of our marketing efforts and publicity regarding IVUS and FFR technology.

Even if IVUS and FFR technology gain wide market acceptance, our IVUS and FFR products may not adequately address market requirements and may not continue to gain or maintain market acceptance among physicians, healthcare payors and the medical community due to factors such as:


•	the lack of perceived benefit from information related to plaque composition available to the physician through use of our IVUS products, including the ability to identify calcified and other forms of plaque;


•	the lack of perceived benefit from information related to pressure and flow characteristics of blood around plaque available to the physician through the use of our FFR products;


•	the actual and perceived ease of use of our IVUS and FFR products;


•	the quality of the images rendered by our IVUS products;


•	the quality of the measurements provided by our FFR products;


•	the cost, performance, benefits and reliability of our IVUS and FFR products relative to competing products and services;


•	the lack of perceived benefit of integration of our IVUS and FFR products into the cath lab; and


•	the extent and timing of technological advances.

If IVUS and FFR technology generally, or our IVUS and FFR products specifically, do not gain or continue to gain wide market acceptance, we may not be able to achieve our anticipated growth, revenues or profitability and our results of operations would suffer.

The risks inherent in our international operations may adversely impact our revenues, results of operations and financial condition.

We derive, and anticipate that we will continue to derive, a significant portion of our revenues from operations in Japan and Europe. As we expand internationally, we will need to hire, train and retain qualified personnel for our manufacturing and direct sales efforts, retain distributors and train their and our manufacturing, sales and other personnel in countries where language, cultural or regulatory impediments may exist. We cannot ensure that distributors, physicians, regulators or other government agencies outside the United States will accept our products, services and business practices. Further, we purchase and manufacture some components in foreign markets. The manufacture, sale and shipment of our products and services across international borders, as well as the purchase of components from non-U.S. sources, subject us to extensive U.S. and foreign governmental trade regulations. Current or future trade, social and environmental regulations or political issues could restrict the supply of resources used in production or increase our costs. Compliance with such regulations is costly. Any failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory obligations in connection with our international operations could impact us in a variety of ways that include, but are not limited to, significant criminal, civil and administrative penalties, including imprisonment of individuals, fines and penalties, denial of export privileges, seizure of shipments and restrictions on certain business activities. Failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory obligations in connection with our international operations could result in the disruption of our manufacturing, shipping and sales activities. Our international sales operations expose us and our representatives, agents and distributors to risks inherent in operating in foreign jurisdictions, including:


•	our ability to obtain, and the costs associated with obtaining, U.S. export licenses and other required export or import licenses or approvals;


•	changes in duties and tariffs, taxes, trade restrictions, license obligations and other non-tariff barriers to trade;


•	burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and regulations related to healthcare products;


•	costs of localizing product and service offerings for foreign markets;


•	business practices favoring local companies;


•	longer payment cycles and difficulties collecting receivables or otherwise exercising remedies (including by foreclosing on the applicable products sold) against defaulting counterparties through foreign legal systems;


•	difficulties in enforcing or defending agreements and intellectual property rights;


•	differing local product preferences, including as a result of differing reimbursement practices;

•

possible failure to comply with anti-bribery laws such as the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions, even though non-compliance could be inadvertent (see, for example, the discussion under “-Risks related to government regulation-We may be subject to federal, state and foreign healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations, and a finding of failure to comply with such laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business.”);


•	fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and their impact on our operating results; and


•	changes in foreign political or economic conditions.

In addition, we face risks associated with potential increased costs associated with overlapping tax structures, including the tax costs associated with repatriating cash. For example, President Obama's administration has announced legislative proposals to tax profits of U.S. companies earned abroad. We derive a significant portion of our revenues from our international operations, and while it is impossible for us to predict whether these and other proposals will be implemented, or how they will

ultimately impact us, they may materially impact our results of operations if, for example, any future potential profits earned abroad are subject to U.S. income tax, or we are otherwise disallowed deductions as a result of any such profits.

We cannot ensure that one or more of these factors will not harm our business. Any material decrease in our international revenues or inability to expand our international operations would adversely impact our revenues, results of operations and financial condition.

Declines in the number of PCI procedures performed for any reason will adversely impact our business.

Our IVUS and FFR products are used in connection with procedures. Physicians may choose to perform fewer PCI procedures. For example, recently the number of PCI procedures declined in the United States and Japan, in part due to concerns regarding the efficacy of therapeutic treatment options, the long-term efficacy of drug-eluting stents, economic constraints, reduced rates of restenosis and concerns by clinicians and payers regarding the appropriateness of conducting PCI procedures. If the number of PCI procedures continues to decline, the need for IVUS and FFR procedures could also decline, which would adversely impact our operating results and our business prospects.

We have a significant amount of indebtedness. We may not be able to generate enough cash flow from our operations to service our indebtedness, and we may incur additional indebtedness in the future, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We have a significant amount of indebtedness, including $485.0 million in aggregate principal amount of indebtedness under our 2.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015, or the 2015 Notes ($25.0 million), and our 1.75% Convertible Notes due 2017, or the 2017 Notes ($460.0 million). Our ability to make payments on, and to refinance, our indebtedness, including the 2015 Notes and the 2017 Notes, and to fund planned capital expenditures, research and development efforts, working capital, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes depends on our ability to generate cash in the future. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. If we do not generate sufficient cash flow from operations or if future borrowings are not available to us in an amount sufficient to pay our indebtedness, including payments of principal upon conversion of the 2015 Notes and the 2017 Notes or on their maturity or in connection with a transaction involving us that constitutes a fundamental change under the indenture governing the 2015 Notes or the 2017 Notes, or to fund our liquidity needs, we may be forced to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness, including the 2015 Notes and 2017 Notes, on or before the maturity thereof, sell assets, reduce or delay capital expenditures, seek to raise additional capital or take other similar actions. We may not be able to execute any of these actions on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Our ability to refinance our indebtedness will depend on our financial condition at the time, the restrictions in the instruments governing our indebtedness and other factors, including market conditions. In addition, in the event of a default under the 2015 Notes or the 2017 Notes, the holders and/or the trustee under the indenture governing the 2015 Notes or the 2017 Notes, as applicable, may accelerate our payment obligations under the applicable notes, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Any such acceleration may also trigger an event of default under the other series of notes. Our inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy our debt service obligations, or to refinance or restructure our obligations on commercially reasonable terms or at all, would likely have an adverse effect, which could be material, on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, our significant indebtedness, combined with our other financial obligations and contractual commitments, could have other important consequences. For example, it could:


•	make us more vulnerable to adverse changes in general U.S. and worldwide economic, industry and competitive conditions and adverse changes in government regulation;


•	limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and our industry;


•	place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors who have less debt; and


•	limit our ability to borrow additional amounts for working capital, capital expenditures, research and development efforts, acquisitions, debt service requirements, execution of our business strategy or other purposes.

Any of these factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if we incur additional indebtedness, which we are not prohibited from doing under the terms of the indentures governing the 2015 Notes and the 2017 Notes, the risks related to our business and our ability to service our indebtedness would increase.

Competition from companies, particularly those that have longer operating histories and greater resources than us, may harm our business.

The medical device industry, including the market for IVUS and FFR products, is highly competitive, subject to rapid technological change and significantly affected by new product introductions and market activities of other participants. As a result, even if the size of the IVUS and FFR market increases, we can make no assurance that our revenues will increase. In

addition, as the markets for medical devices, including IVUS and FFR products, develop, additional competitors could enter the market. To compete effectively, we will need to continue to demonstrate that our products are attractive relative to alternative devices and treatments. We believe that our continued success depends on our ability to:


•	innovate and maintain scientifically advanced technology;


•	apply our technology across products and markets;


•	successfully market our products;


•	develop proprietary products;


•	successfully conduct clinical studies that expand our markets;


•	obtain and maintain patent protection for our products;


•	secure and preserve regulatory approvals;


•	achieve manufacturing efficiencies;


•	attract and retain skilled personnel; and


•	successfully add complementary offerings and technology through acquisitions, licensing agreements and strategic partnerships.

With respect to our IVUS products, our primary competitor is Boston Scientific, Inc., though our IVUS products also compete with the OCT products offered by St. Jude Medical, Inc., or St. Jude. Our FFR products compete with the products of St. Jude and ACIST Medical Systems. We also compete in Japan with respect to IVUS products with Terumo Corporation, or Terumo. Boston Scientific, St. Jude, Terumo and other potential competitors who are or may be substantially larger than us may enjoy competitive advantages, including:


•	more established distribution networks;


•	entrenched relationships with physicians;


•	products and procedures that are less expensive;


•	broader ranges of products and services that may be sold in bundled arrangements;


•	greater experience in launching, marketing, distributing and selling products;


•	greater experience in obtaining and maintaining FDA and other regulatory clearances and approvals;


•	established relationships with healthcare providers and payors; and


•	greater financial and other resources for product development, sales and marketing, acquisitions of products and companies, and intellectual property protection.

We have encountered and expect to continue to encounter potential physician customers who, due to existing relationships with our competitors, are committed to or prefer the products offered by these competitors.

For these and other reasons, we may not be able to compete successfully against our current or potential future competitors, and sales of our IVUS and FFR products may decline.

Failure to innovate may adversely impact our competitive position and may adversely impact our ability to drive price increases for our products and our product revenues.

Our future success will depend upon our ability to innovate new products and introduce enhancements to our existing products in order to address the changing needs of the marketplace. We also rely on new products and product enhancements to attempt to drive price increases for our products in our markets. Frequently, product development programs require assessments to be made of future clinical need and commercial feasibility, which are difficult to predict. Customers may forego purchases of our products and purchase our competitors' products as a result of delays in introduction of our new products and enhancements, failure to choose correctly among technical alternatives or failure to offer innovative products or enhancements at competitive prices and in a timely manner. In addition, announcements of new products may result in a delay in or cancellation of purchasing decisions in anticipation of such new products. We may not have adequate resources to introduce new products in time to effectively compete in the marketplace. Any delays in product releases may negatively affect our business.

We also compete with new and existing alternative technologies that are being used to penetrate the worldwide vascular imaging market without using IVUS technology. These products, procedures or solutions could prove to be more effective, faster, safer or less costly than our IVUS products. Technologies such as angiography, angioscopy, multi-slice computed tomography, intravascular magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI, electron beam computed tomography, and MRI with contrast agents are being used in lieu of or for imaging the vascular system.

We also develop and manufacture laser and non-laser light sources, optical engines used in OCT imaging systems as well as micro-optical spectrometers and optical channel monitors with applications in telecommunications, pharmaceutical manufacturing, high-speed industrial process control, and chemical and petrochemical processing, medical diagnostics, and scientific discovery. Products developed by competitors based on tunable filter technology could compete on the basis of lower

cost and other factors. In addition, customers may build similar functionality directly into their products, which in turn could decrease the demand for our products.

The introduction of new products, procedures or clinical solutions by competitors may result in price reductions, reduced margins, loss of market share and may render our products obsolete. We cannot guarantee that these alternative technologies will not be commercialized and become viable alternatives to our products in the future, and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to compete successfully against them if they are commercialized.

The successful continuing development of our existing and new products depends on us maintaining strong relationships with physicians.

The research, development, marketing and sales of our products are dependent upon our maintaining working relationships with physicians. We rely on these professionals to provide us with considerable knowledge and experience regarding the development, marketing and sale of our products. If we are unable to maintain our strong relationships with these professionals and continue to receive their advice and input, our existing and new products may not be developed and marketed in line with the needs and expectations of the professionals who use or would use and support our products and the development and marketing of our products could suffer, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Delays or failures in planned product introductions may adversely affect our business and negatively impact future revenues.

We are currently developing new products as well as product enhancements with respect to our existing products. We have in the past experienced, and may again in the future experience, delays and failures in various phases of product development and commercial launch, including during research and development, manufacturing, limited release testing, marketing and customer education efforts. In particular, developing and integrating products and technologies of acquired businesses is time consuming and has in the past resulted, and may again in the future result, in longer developmental timelines than we initially anticipated or our discontinuing our development or commercialization efforts with respect to the acquired products and technologies. Any delays in our product launches or our discontinuing our development or commercialization efforts with respect to any product candidates or products may significantly impede our ability to successfully compete in our markets and may reduce our revenues.

We and our present and future collaborators may fail to develop or effectively commercialize products covered by our present and future collaborations if:


•	our collaborators become competitors of ours or enter into agreements with our competitors;


•	we do not achieve our objectives under our collaboration agreements;


•	we are unable to manage multiple simultaneous product discovery and development collaborations;


•	we develop products and processes or enter into additional collaborations that conflict with the business objectives of our other collaborators;


•	we or our collaborators are unable to obtain patent protection for the products or proprietary technologies we develop in our collaborations; or


•	we or our collaborators encounter regulatory hurdles that prevent commercialization of our products.

In addition, conflicts may arise with our collaborators, such as conflicts concerning the interpretation of clinical data, the achievement of milestones, the interpretation of financial provisions or the ownership of intellectual property developed during the collaboration. If any conflicts arise with our existing or future collaborators, they may act in their self-interest, which may be adverse to our best interest.

If we or our collaborators are unable to develop or commercialize products, or if conflicts arise with our collaborators, we will be delayed or prevented from developing and commercializing products, which will harm our business and financial results.

If the clinical studies that we sponsor or co-sponsor are unsuccessful, or clinical data from studies conducted by other industry participants are negative, we may not be able to develop or increase penetration in identified markets and our business prospects may suffer.

We sponsor or co-sponsor several clinical studies to demonstrate the benefits of our products in current markets where we are trying to increase use of our products and in new markets. Implementing a study is time consuming and expensive, and the outcome is uncertain. The completion of any of these studies may be delayed or halted for numerous reasons, including, but not limited to, the following:


•	the death of one or more patients during a clinical study for reasons that may or may not be related to our products, including the advanced stage of their disease or other medical problems;


•	regulatory inspections of manufacturing facilities, which may, among other things, require us or a co-sponsor to undertake corrective action or suspend the clinical studies;


•	changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions;


•	adverse side effects in patients, including adverse side effects from our or a co-sponsor's drug candidate or device;


•	the FDA institutional review boards or other regulatory authorities do not approve a clinical study protocol or place a clinical study on hold;


•	patients do not enroll in a clinical study or do not follow up at the expected rate;


•	our co-sponsors do not perform their obligations in relation to the clinical study or terminate the study;


•	third-party clinical investigators do not perform the clinical studies on the anticipated schedule or consistent with the clinical study protocol and good clinical practices, or other third-party organizations do not perform data collection and analysis in a timely or accurate manner; and


•	the interim results of the clinical study are inconclusive or negative, and the study design, although approved and completed, is inadequate to demonstrate safety and efficacy of our products.

Some of the studies that we co-sponsor are designed to study the efficacy of a third-party's drug candidate or device. Such studies are designed and controlled by the third party and the results of such studies will largely depend upon the success of the third-party's drug candidate or device. These studies may be terminated before completion for reasons beyond our control such as adverse events associated with a third-party drug candidate or device. A failure in such a study may have an adverse impact on our business by either the attribution of the study's failure to our technology or our inability to leverage publicity for proper functionality of our products as part of a failed study.

Clinical studies may require the enrollment of large numbers of patients, and suitable patients may be difficult to identify and recruit. Patient enrollment in clinical studies and completion of patient follow-up depend on many factors, including the size of the patient population, the study protocol, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, eligibility criteria for the study and patient compliance. For example, patients may be discouraged from enrolling in our clinical studies if the applicable protocol requires them to undergo extensive post-treatment procedures or if they are persuaded to participate in different contemporaneous studies conducted by other parties. Delays in patient enrollment or failure of patients to continue to participate in a study may result in an increase in costs, delays or the failure of the study. Such events may have a negative impact on our business by making it difficult to penetrate or expand certain identified markets. Further, if we are forced to contribute greater financial and clinical resources to a study, valuable resources will be diverted from other areas of our business.

Negative results from clinical studies conducted by other industry participants could harm our results.

Divestitures of any of our businesses or product lines may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We continue to evaluate the performance of all of our businesses and may sell a business or product line. Any divestitures may result in significant write-offs, including those related to goodwill and other intangible assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Divestitures could involve additional risks, including difficulties in the separation of operations, services, products and personnel, the diversion of management's attention from other business concerns, the disruption of our business and the potential loss of key employees. We may not be successful in managing these or any other significant risks that we encounter in divesting a business or product line.

In connection with our recent acquisitions we may experience difficulty with integration, and if we choose to acquire any new businesses, products or technologies, we may experience difficulty in the identification or integration of any such acquisition, and our business may suffer.

Our success depends on our ability to continually enhance and broaden our product offerings in response to changing customer demands, competitive pressures and technologies. Accordingly, we have acquired, and may in the future acquire, complementary businesses, products or technologies instead of developing them ourselves. We recently acquired Sync-Rx, Ltd., or Sync-Rx; Crux Biomedical, Inc., or Crux; the Pioneer Plus re-entry catheter product line, or Pioneer, from Medtronic, Inc; and AtheroMed, Inc., or AtheroMed. We can provide no assurance that the expected benefits of the Sync-Rx, Crux, Pioneer or AtheroMed acquisitions will be realized. Furthermore, we have agreed in the merger agreement with Crux that, in the event that we have not achieved the applicable commercial launch for one of the Crux products by June 30, 2016 (which date may be extended upon a specified payment by us to June 30, 2017), we will license back to the former Crux stockholders certain intellectual property rights relating to that product, which could adversely affect our business. We do not know if we will identify or complete any additional acquisitions, or whether we will be able to successfully integrate any acquired business, product or technology or retain key employees, including in connection with our acquisitions of Sync-Rx, Crux, Pioneer or AtheroMed. Integrating any business, product or technology we acquire could be expensive and time consuming, disrupt our ongoing business and distract our management. If we are unable to integrate any acquired businesses, products or technologies effectively, our business will suffer. We have entered, and may in the future enter, markets through our acquisitions that we are

not familiar with and have no experience managing. If we fail to integrate these operations into our business, our resources may be diverted from our core business and this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business has become more decentralized geographically through our acquisitions and this may expose us to operating inefficiencies across these diverse locations, including difficulties and unanticipated expenses related to the integration of departments, information technology systems, and accounting records and maintaining uniform standards, such as internal controls, procedures and policies. In addition, we have, and in the future may increase, our exposure to risks related to business operations outside the United States due to our acquisitions.

We may also encounter risks, costs and expenses associated with any undisclosed or other unanticipated liabilities, use more cash and other financial resources on integration and implementation activities than we expect or incur significant costs and expenses related to litigation with counterparties to such transactions, such as the lawsuit filed against us in federal district court on March 27, 2012 alleging claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing based on our acquisition of CardioSpectra, Inc. in 2007. Though our motion for summary judgment was granted in May 2014, we were still required to divert considerable resources, including management time and attention, to this litigation. In addition, any amortization or other charges resulting from acquisitions, including write-offs relating to goodwill and other intangible assets, could negatively impact our operating results.

If our products and technologies are unable to adequately identify the plaque that is most likely to rupture and cause a coronary event, we may not be able to develop a market for our vulnerable plaque products or expand the market for existing products.

We are utilizing substantial resources in the development of products and technologies to aid in the identification, diagnosis and treatment of the plaque that is most likely to rupture and cause a coronary event, or vulnerable plaque. The Providing Regional Observations to Study Predictors of Events in the Coronary Tree, or PROSPECT, study demonstrated the ability of IVUS and virtual histology, or VH, to stratify lesions according to risk. However, no randomized controlled trial has been performed to assess the benefit of treating or deferring treatment in these stratified lesions. If we are unable to develop products or technologies that can identify vulnerable plaque, a market for products to identify vulnerable plaque may not materialize and our business may suffer.

Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could result in declines in our reported revenues and earnings.

Even though we engage in foreign currency hedging arrangements for certain of our foreign currency exchange exposures, foreign currency fluctuations may adversely affect our revenues and earnings. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, 23.9% and 20.3% of our revenues were denominated in Japanese yen, or yen, and the euro, respectively, and 10.7% and 12.0% of our operating expenses were denominated in yen and euro, respectively. We enter into derivative financial instruments, principally forward contracts, to manage a portion of the foreign currency risk related to transactions in non-functional currencies. Commencing in April 2013, we initiated a hedging program that broadened our use of foreign currency forward contracts to manage portions of our foreign currency risk related to certain forecasted intercompany inventory transactions with our foreign subsidiaries and expand the application of forward contracts to additional non-functional currency transactions worldwide. We cannot be assured our hedges will be effective or that the costs of the hedges will not exceed their benefits. Fluctuations in the rate of exchange between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies, primarily the yen and the euro, could result in material amounts of cash being required to settle the hedge transactions or could adversely affect our financial results. In periods of a strengthening U.S. dollar relative to the yen or the euro, we would record less revenue and our results of operations could be negatively impacted.

General national and worldwide economic conditions may materially and adversely affect our financial performance and results of operations.

Our operations and performance depend significantly on national and worldwide economic conditions and the resulting impact on purchasing decisions and the level of spending on our products by customers in the geographic markets in which our IVUS and FFR and other products are sold or distributed. These economic conditions remain challenging in many countries and regions, including without limitation the United States, Japan, Europe, the Middle East and Africa, where we have generated most of our revenues. In the United States, the recovery from the recent recession has been below historic averages and the unemployment rate is expected to remain high for some time. The challenging global economic conditions have also led to concerns over the solvency of certain European Union member states, including Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain. The political unrest in the Middle East may have adverse consequences to the global economy or to our customers in the Middle East, which could negatively impact our business. In any event, uncertainty about future economic conditions makes it difficult for us to forecast operating results and to make decisions about future investments. If our customers do not obtain or do not have access to the necessary capital to operate their businesses, or are otherwise adversely affected by the deterioration in national and worldwide economic conditions, this could result in reductions in the sales of our products, longer sales cycles

and slower adoption of new technologies by our customers, which would materially and adversely affect our business. We experienced declines in the number of PCI procedures performed in the U.S. and in sales of our non-medical products to telecommunications and industrial companies during 2013 and the first half of 2014 due to, in part, the then-prevailing economic conditions. In addition, our customers', distributors' and suppliers' liquidity, capital resources and credit may be adversely affected by their relative ability or inability to obtain capital and credit, which could adversely affect our ability to collect on our outstanding invoices or lengthen our collection cycles or otherwise exercise remedies (including by foreclosing on the applicable products sold) against a defaulting customer or distributor, adversely affect our ability to distribute our products or limit our timely access to important sources of raw materials necessary for the manufacture of our consoles and catheters.

We have invested a portion of our excess cash in money market funds and corporate debt securities issued by banks and corporations. The interest paid on these types of investments and the value of certain securities may decline. While our investment portfolio has experienced reduced yields, we have not yet experienced a deterioration of the credit quality of our holdings or other material adverse effects. There can be no assurances that our investment portfolio will not experience any such deterioration in credit quality or other material adverse effects in future periods, or that national and worldwide economic conditions will not worsen.

Quality problems with our processes and products could harm our reputation for producing high-quality products and erode our competitive advantage, sales and market share.

The manufacture of our products is a highly exacting and complex process, due in part to strict regulatory requirements. Failure to manufacture our products in accordance with product specifications could result in increased costs, lost revenues, field corrective actions, customer dissatisfaction or voluntary product recalls, any of which could harm our profitability and commercial reputation. Problems may arise during manufacturing for a variety of reasons, including equipment malfunction, failure to follow specific protocols and procedures, problems with raw materials, natural disasters and environmental factors. Quality is extremely important to us and our customers due to the serious and costly consequences of product failure. Our quality certifications are critical to the marketing success of our products. If we fail to meet these standards, our reputation could be damaged, we could lose customers, and our revenue and results of operations could decline. Aside from specific customer standards, our success depends generally on our ability to manufacture to exact tolerances precision-engineered components, subassemblies, and finished devices from multiple materials. If our components fail to meet these standards or fail to adapt to evolving standards, our reputation as a manufacturer of high-quality devices will be harmed, our competitive advantage could be damaged, and we could lose customers and market share.

Our manufacturing operations are dependent upon third-party suppliers, some of which are sole-sourced, which makes us vulnerable to supply problems, price fluctuations and manufacturing delays.

We rely on a number of sole source suppliers to supply transducers and substrates used in our catheters. We do not carry significant inventory of transducers or substrates. If we had to change suppliers, we expect that it would take 6 to 24 months to identify appropriate suppliers, complete design work and undertake the necessary inspections and testing before the new transducers and substrates would be available. We are not parties to supply agreements with these suppliers but instead use purchase orders as needed.

Our reliance on sole source suppliers for these and other materials, components, products and processing subjects us to a number of risks that could impact our ability to manufacture our products and harm our business, including:


•	inability to obtain adequate supply in a timely manner or on commercially reasonable terms;


•	interruption or delayed delivery of supply resulting from our suppliers' difficulty in accessing financial or credit markets or otherwise securing cash and capital resources;


•	interruption of supply resulting from modifications to, or discontinuation of, a supplier's operations;


•	delays in product shipments resulting from uncorrected defects, reliability issues or a supplier's variation in a component;


•	uncorrected quality and reliability defects that impact performance, efficacy and safety of products from replacement suppliers;


•	price fluctuations due to a lack of long-term supply arrangements with our suppliers for key components;


•	difficulty identifying and qualifying alternative suppliers for components in a timely manner;


•	production delays related to the evaluation and testing of products from alternative suppliers and corresponding regulatory qualifications; and


•	delays in delivery by our suppliers due to changes in demand from us or their other customers.

In addition, because we do not have long term supply agreements with some of our suppliers, we are subjected to the following risks:


•	unscheduled price increases;


•	lack of notice when the materials used to manufacture are not available; and


•	lack of notice of discontinued operations or manufacturing.

We also utilize lean manufacturing processes that attempt to optimize the timing of our inventory purchases and supply levels of our inventories. Any significant delay or interruption in the supply of components or materials, or our inability to obtain substitute components or materials from alternate sources at acceptable prices and in a timely manner or to plan for sufficient inventory, could impair our ability to manufacture our products or meet the demand of our customers and harm our business. Identifying and qualifying additional or replacement suppliers for any of the components or materials used in our products, or obtaining additional inventory, if required, may not be accomplished quickly or at all and could involve significant additional costs. Any supply interruption from our suppliers or failure to obtain additional suppliers for any of the components or materials used to manufacture our products or sufficient inventory would limit our ability to manufacture our products and could therefore have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may encounter a number of challenges relating to the management and operation of our newly constructed Costa Rica facilities, and the expansion has and will continue to increase our fixed costs, which may have a negative impact on our financial results and condition.

In 2010, we, through a wholly owned subsidiary, entered into a series of agreements to acquire real property and design and build manufacturing facilities in Costa Rica. Prior to 2012, we had never operated manufacturing facilities outside the United States, and cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully operate these facilities in an efficient or profitable manner. In addition, we are continuing to transfer our manufacturing processes, technology and know-how to our Costa Rica facilities. If we are unable to operate these facilities or successfully transfer our manufacturing processes, technology and know-how in a timely and cost-effective manner, or at all, then we may experience disruptions in our operations, which could negatively impact our business and financial results.

During 2012 we received regulatory approval to ship product from our Costa Rica facility to the United States, Japan and certain countries in Europe. We will need to obtain a number of additional regulatory approvals prior, and subsequent, to shipping products from this facility to other geographies. Our ability to obtain these approvals may be subject to additional costs and possible delays beyond what we initially plan for. In addition, our manufacturing facilities, and those of our suppliers, must comply with applicable regulatory requirements. Failure of our manufacturing facilities to comply with regulatory and quality requirements would harm our business and our results of operations.

Our ability to operate this facility successfully will greatly depend on our ability to hire, train and retain an adequate number of employees, in particular employees with the appropriate level of knowledge, background and skills. We will compete with several other medical device companies with manufacturing facilities in Costa Rica to hire these skilled employees. Should we be unable to hire such employees, and an adequate number of them, our business and financial results could be negatively impacted.

The expansion of the manufacturing facilities has and will continue to increase our fixed costs. If we experience a demand in our products that exceeds our manufacturing capacity, we may not have sufficient inventory to meet our customers' demands, which would negatively impact our revenues. If the demand for our products decreases or if we do not produce the output we plan or anticipate after the facilities are operational, we may not be able to spread a significant amount of our fixed costs over the production volume, thereby increasing our per unit fixed cost, which would have a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

We also face particular commercial, jurisdictional and legal risks associated with our operations in Costa Rica. The success of this relationship and our activities in Costa Rica in general are subject to the economic, political and legal conditions or developments in Costa Rica.

Disruptions or other adverse developments during the operations of our Costa Rica facilities could materially adversely affect our business. If our Costa Rica operations are disrupted for any reason, we may be forced to locate alternative manufacturing facilities, including facilities operated by third parties. Disruptions may include, but are not limited to: changes in the legal and regulatory environment in Costa Rica; slowdowns or work stoppages within the Costa Rican customs authorities; acts of God (including but not limited to potential disruptive effects from an active volcano near the facility or earthquakes, hurricanes and other natural disasters); and other issues associated with significant operations that are remote from our headquarters and operations centers. Additionally, continued growth in product sales could outpace the ability of our Costa Rican operation to supply products on a timely basis or cause us to take actions within our manufacturing operations, which increase costs, complexity and timing. Locating alternative facilities would be time-consuming, would disrupt our production and cause shipment delays and could result in damage to our reputation and profitability. Additionally, we cannot assure you that alternative manufacturing facilities would offer the same cost structure as our Costa Rica facility.

If our facilities or systems are damaged or destroyed, we may experience delays that could negatively impact our revenues or have other adverse effects.

Our facilities may be affected by natural or man-made disasters. If one of our facilities were affected by a disaster, we would be forced to rely on third-party manufacturers or to shift production to another manufacturing facility. In such an event, we would face significant delays in manufacturing which would prevent us from being able to sell our products. In addition, our insurance may not be sufficient to cover all of the potential losses and may not continue to be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. Furthermore, although our computer and communications systems are protected through physical and software safeguards, they are still vulnerable to fire, storm, flood, power loss, earthquakes, telecommunications failures, physical or software break-ins, software viruses, and similar events, and any failure of these systems to perform for any reason and for any period of time could adversely impact our ability to operate our business.

We may require significant additional capital to pursue our growth strategy, and our failure to raise capital when needed could prevent us from executing our growth strategy.

We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents and short-term and long-term available-for-sale investments will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next 12 months. However, we may need to obtain additional financing to pursue our business strategy, to respond to new competitive pressures or to act on opportunities to acquire or invest in complementary businesses, products or technologies. The timing and amount of our working capital and capital expenditure requirements may vary significantly depending on numerous factors, including:


•	market acceptance of our products;


•	the revenues generated by our products;


•	the need to adapt to changing technologies and technical requirements, and the costs related thereto;


•	the costs associated with expanding our manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution efforts;


•	the existence and timing of opportunities for expansion, including acquisitions and strategic transactions; and


•	costs and fees associated with defending existing or potential litigation.

In addition, we are required to make periodic interest payments to the holders of the 2015 Notes and the 2017 Notes and to make payments of principal upon conversion or maturity. We may also be required to purchase the 2015 Notes or the 2017 Notes for cash upon the occurrence of a change of control or certain other fundamental changes involving us. If our capital resources are insufficient to satisfy our debt service or liquidity requirements, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities or to obtain debt financing. The sale of additional equity or debt securities, or the use of our stock in an acquisition or strategic transaction, would result in additional dilution to our stockholders. Additional debt would result in increased expenses and could result in covenants that would restrict our operations. We have not made arrangements to obtain additional financing and our significant historical losses and the current national and global financial conditions may prevent us from obtaining additional funds on favorable terms, if at all.

We are dependent on our collaborations, and events involving these collaborations or any future collaborations could delay or prevent us from developing or commercializing products.

The success of our current business strategy and our near- and long-term viability will depend on our ability to execute successfully on existing strategic collaborations and to establish new strategic collaborations. Collaborations allow us to leverage our resources and technologies and to access markets that are compatible with our own core areas of expertise. To penetrate our target markets, we may need to enter into additional collaborative agreements to assist in the development and commercialization of future products. Establishing strategic collaborations is difficult and time-consuming. Potential collaborators may reject collaborations based upon their assessment of our financial, regulatory or intellectual property position or our internal capabilities. Our discussions with potential collaborators may not lead to the establishment of new collaborations on favorable terms or at all.

We have collaborations with a number of entities or their affiliates, including The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Siemens AG, Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. and General Electric Company. In each collaboration, we combine our technology or core capabilities with those of the third party to permit either greater penetration into markets or to enhance the functionality of our current and planned products. We have limited control over the amount and timing of resources that our current collaborators or any future collaborators devote to our collaborations or potential products. These collaborators may breach or terminate their agreements with us or otherwise fail to conduct their collaborative activities successfully and in a timely manner. Further, our collaborators may not develop or commercialize products that arise out of our collaborative arrangements or devote sufficient resources to the development, manufacture, marketing or sale of these products. Moreover, in the event of termination of a collaboration agreement, we may not realize the intended benefits or we may not be able to replace the arrangement on comparable terms or at all.

If the third-party distributors that we rely on to market and sell our products are not successful, we may be unable to increase or maintain our level of revenues.

A portion of our revenue is generated by our third-party distributors, especially in international markets. If these distributors cease or limit operations or experience a disruption of their business operations, or are not successful in selling our products, we may be unable to increase or maintain our level of revenues, and any such developments could negatively affect our international sales strategy. Over the long term, we intend to grow our business internationally, and to do so we will need to attract additional distributors to expand the territories in which we do not directly sell our products. Our distributors may not commit the necessary resources to market and sell our products. If current or future distributors do not continue to distribute our products or do not perform adequately or if we are unable to locate distributors in particular geographic areas, we may not realize revenue growth internationally.

Our reported or future financial results could be adversely affected by the application of existing or future accounting standards.

U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and related implementation guidelines and interpretations can be highly complex and involve subjective judgments. Changes in these rules or their interpretation, the adoption of new guidance or the application of existing guidance to changes in our business could have a significant adverse effect on our financial results. For example, the accounting for convertible debt securities, and the accounting for the convertible note hedge transactions and the warrant transactions we entered into in connection with the offerings of the 2015 Notes and the 2017 Notes, is subject to frequent scrutiny by the accounting regulatory bodies and is subject to change. We cannot predict if or when any such change could be made, and any such change could have an adverse impact on our reported or future financial results. In addition, in the event the conversion features of the 2015 Notes or the 2017 Notes are triggered, we could be required under applicable accounting standards to reclassify all or a portion of the outstanding principal of the 2015 Notes or the 2017 Notes as a current rather than long-term liability, which would result in a material reduction of our net working capital.

We cannot assure you that our net operating loss carryforwards will be available to reduce our tax liability.

Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards to reduce future income tax obligations may be limited or reduced. Generally, a change of more than 50 percentage points in the ownership of our shares, by value, over the three-year period ending on the date the shares were acquired constitutes an ownership change and may limit our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards. Should additional ownership changes occur in the future, our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards could be limited. In addition, with respect to any entity that we have acquired or may in the future acquire, the ability of those entities to use net operating loss carryforwards, if any, to reduce future income tax obligations may be limited or reduced due to changes in ownership of such entities occurring prior to or as a result of our acquisition of such entities.

If we fail to properly manage our anticipated growth, our business could suffer.

Rapid growth of our business is likely to continue to place a significant strain on our managerial, operational and financial resources and systems. To execute our anticipated growth successfully, we must attract and retain qualified personnel and manage and train them effectively. We anticipate hiring additional personnel to assist in the commercialization of our current products and in the development of future products. We will be dependent on our personnel and third parties to effectively market and sell our products to an increasing number of customers. We will also depend on our personnel to develop and manufacture in anticipated increased volumes our existing products, as well as new products and product enhancements. Further, our anticipated growth will place additional strain on our suppliers resulting in increased need for us to carefully monitor for quality assurance. Any failure by us to manage our growth effectively could have an adverse effect on our ability to achieve our development and commercialization goals.

Issues arising from the implementation of our new enterprise resource planning system could adversely affect our operating results and ability to manage our business effectively.

We recently completed our company-wide implementation of a new enterprise resource planning, or ERP, system to further enhance operating efficiencies and provide more effective management of our business operations. Implementing a new ERP system is costly and involves risks inherent in the conversion to a new computer system, including loss of information, disruption to our normal operations, changes in accounting procedures and internal control over financial reporting, as well as problems achieving accuracy in the conversion of electronic data. Failure to properly or adequately address these issues could result in increased costs, the diversion of management's and employees' attention and resources and could materially adversely affect our operating results, internal controls over financial reporting and ability to manage our business effectively. While the ERP system is intended to further improve and enhance our information systems, large scale implementation of a new information system exposes us to the risks of starting up the new system and integrating that system with our existing systems and processes, including possible disruption of our financial reporting, which could lead to a failure to make required filings under the federal securities laws on a timely basis.

Any defects or malfunctions in the computer hardware or software we utilize in our products could cause severe performance failures in such products, which would harm our reputation and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our existing and new products depend and will depend on the continuous, effective and reliable operation of computer hardware and software. For example, our IVUS products utilize sophisticated software that analyzes in real-time plaque composition and identifies lumen and vessel borders, which are then displayed in three-dimensional, color-coded images on a computer screen. Although we update the computer software utilized in our products on a regular basis, there can be no guarantee that defects do not or will not in the future exist or that unforeseen malfunctions, whether within our control or otherwise, will not occur. In addition, our devices may be targeted and/or adversely affected by cybersecurity attacks, including malware. Although we have implemented various safeguards to prevent unauthorized access or modification to our products, we cannot assure you that these safeguards are or will continue to be effective. Any defect, malfunction or other failing in the computer hardware or software utilized by our IVUS or other products, including products we develop in the future, could result in inaccurate readings, misinterpretations of data, or other performance failures that could render our products unreliable or ineffective and could lead to decreased confidence in our products, damage to our reputation, reduction in our sales and product liability claims, the occurrence of any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, as a result of cybersecurity vulnerabilities and incidents that could directly impact medical devices, in June 2013 the FDA issued draft guidance which may result in additional regulation in the medical device industry, which could, among other things, impact our ability to obtain regulatory approval of new products.

If we are unable to recruit, hire and retain skilled and experienced personnel, our ability to effectively manage and expand our business will be harmed.

Our success largely depends on the skills, experience and efforts of our officers and other key employees who may terminate their employment at any time. The loss of any of our senior management team, in particular our President and Chief Executive Officer, R. Scott Huennekens, could harm our business. We have employment contracts or similar agreements with R. Scott Huennekens and our Chief Financial Officer, John T. Dahldorf, but these agreements do not guarantee that they will remain employed by us in the future. The announcement of the loss of one of our key employees could negatively affect our stock price. Our ability to retain our skilled workforce and our success in attracting and hiring new skilled employees will be a critical factor in determining whether we will be successful in the future. We face challenges in hiring, training, managing and retaining employees in certain areas including clinical, technical, sales and marketing. This could delay new product development and commercialization, and hinder our marketing and sales efforts, which would adversely impact our competitiveness and financial results.

The expense and potential unavailability of insurance coverage for our company, customers or products may have an adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

While we currently have insurance for our business, property, directors and officers, and product liability, insurance is increasingly costly and the scope of coverage is narrower, and we may be required to assume more risk in the future. If we are subject to claims or suffer a loss or damage in excess of our insurance coverage, we will be required to cover the amounts outside of or in excess of our insurance limits. If we are subject to claims or suffer a loss or damage that is outside of our insurance coverage, we may incur significant costs associated with loss or damage that could have an adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations. Furthermore, any claims made on our insurance policies may impact our ability to obtain or maintain insurance coverage at reasonable costs or at all. We do not have the financial resources to self-insure, and it is unlikely that we will have these financial resources in the foreseeable future.

Our product liability insurance covers our products and business operations, but we may need to increase and expand this coverage commensurate with our expanding business. Any product liability claims brought against us, with or without merit, could result in:


•	substantial costs of related litigation or regulatory action;


•	substantial monetary penalties or awards;


•	decreased demand for our products;


•	reduced revenue or market penetration;


•	injury to our reputation;


•	withdrawal of clinical study participants;


•	an inability to establish new strategic relationships;


•	increased product liability insurance rates; and


•	an inability to secure continuing coverage.

Some of our customers and prospective customers may have difficulty in procuring or maintaining liability insurance to cover their operation and use of our products. Medical malpractice carriers are withdrawing coverage in certain regions or substantially increasing premiums. If this trend continues or worsens, our customers may discontinue using our products and potential customers may opt against purchasing our products due to the cost or inability to procure insurance coverage.

Risks Related to Government Regulation

Compliance with changing corporate governance and public disclosure regulations may result in additional expenses.

Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, new SEC regulations and Nasdaq Global Select Market rules, are creating uncertainty for companies such as ours. As one example, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the SEC has promulgated rules regarding disclosure of the presence in a company's products of certain metals, known as “conflict minerals,” which are metals mined from the Democratic Republic of the Congo and adjoining countries, as well as procedures regarding a manufacturer's efforts to identify the sourcing of those minerals from this region. Complying with these rules requires investigative efforts, which causes us to incur associated costs, and could adversely affect the sourcing, supply, and pricing of materials used in our products, or result in process or manufacturing modifications, all of which could adversely affect our results of operations.

To maintain high standards of corporate governance and public disclosure, we have invested, and intend to continue to invest, in reasonably necessary resources to comply with evolving standards. These investments have resulted in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities and may continue to do so in the future.

If we fail to obtain or maintain, or experience significant delays in obtaining, regulatory clearances or approvals for our products or product enhancements, our ability to commercially distribute and market our products could suffer.

Our products are subject to rigorous regulation by the FDA and numerous other federal, state and foreign governmental authorities. Our failure to comply with such regulations or to make adequate, timely corrections, could lead to the imposition of injunctions, suspensions or loss of marketing clearances or approvals, product recalls, manufacturing cessation, termination of distribution, product seizures, civil penalties, or some combination of such actions. The process of obtaining regulatory authorizations to market a medical device, particularly from the FDA, can be costly and time consuming, and there can be no assurance that such authorizations will be granted on a timely basis, if at all. If regulatory clearance or approvals are received, additional delays may occur related to manufacturing, distribution or product labeling. In addition, we cannot assure you that any new or modified medical devices we develop will be eligible for the shorter 510(k) clearance process as opposed to the PMA process. We have no experience in obtaining PMA approvals. For example, the FDA has been reviewing its 510(k) process and could change the criteria to obtain clearance, which could affect our ability to obtain timely reviews and increase the resources needed to meet new criteria. FDA has also issued, and may in the future issue, draft guidance documents that, if implemented, will likely entail additional regulatory burdens. These additional regulatory burdens could delay our ability to obtain new clearances, increase the costs of compliance or restrict our ability to maintain our current clearances. Such changes could adversely affect our business.

In the member states of the European Economic Area, or EEA, our medical devices are required to comply with the essential requirements of the EU Medical Devices Directives before they can be marketed. Our products, including their design and manufacture, must be certified as being compliant with the requirements of the Medical Devices Directives. Upon receipt of such certification, we may affix a CE mark to our products and their packaging and sell these products in the EEA. If we fail to maintain compliance with the Medical Devices Directives, our products will no longer qualify for the CE mark and the relevant devices would not be eligible for marketing in the EEA.

We currently market our IVUS and FFR products in Japan under two types of regulatory approval known as a SHONIN and a NINSHO. As the holder of the SHONINs, we have the authority to import and sell those products for which we have the SHONINs as well as those products for which we have obtained a NINSHO. Responsibility for Japanese regulatory filings and future compliance resides with us. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to adequately meet Japanese regulatory requirements. Non-compliance with Japanese regulations may result in action to prohibit further importation and sale of our products in Japan, a significant market for our products. If we are unable to sell our IVUS and FFR products in Japan, we will lose a significant part of our annual revenues, and our business will be substantially impacted.

Foreign governmental authorities that regulate the manufacture and sale of medical devices have become increasingly stringent, and to the extent we continue to market and sell our products in foreign countries, we will be subject to rigorous regulation in the future. In such circumstances, where we utilize distributors in foreign countries to market and sell our products, we would rely significantly on our distributors to comply with the varying regulations, and any failures on their part could result in restrictions on the sale of our products in foreign countries. Regulatory delays or failures to obtain and maintain marketing authorizations, including 510(k) clearances and PMA approvals, could disrupt our business, harm our reputation, and adversely affect our sales.

Modifications to our products may require new regulatory clearances or approvals or may require us to recall or cease marketing our products until clearances or approvals are obtained.

Modifications to our products may require the submission of new 510(k) notifications or PMA applications. If a modification is implemented to address a safety concern, we may also need to initiate a recall or cease distribution of the affected device. In addition, if the modified devices require the submission of a 510(k) or PMA and we distribute such modified devices without a new 510(k) clearance or PMA approval, we may be required to recall or cease distributing the devices. The FDA can review a manufacturer's decision not to submit a modification and may disagree. The FDA may also on its own initiative determine that clearance of a new 510(k) or approval of a new PMA submission is required. We have made modifications to our products in the past and may make additional modifications in the future that we believe do not or will not require clearance of a new 510(k) or approval of a new PMA. If we begin manufacture and distribution of the modified devices and the FDA later disagrees with our determination and requires the submission of a new 510(k) or PMA for the modifications, we may also be required to recall the distributed modified devices and to stop distribution of the modified devices, which could have an adverse effect on our business. If the FDA does not clear or approve the modified devices, we may need to redesign the devices, which could also harm our business. When a device is marketed without a required clearance or approval, the FDA has the authority to bring an enforcement action, including injunction, seizure and criminal prosecution. The FDA considers such additional actions generally when there is a serious risk to public health or safety and the company's corrective and preventive actions are inadequate to address the FDA's concerns.

Where we determine that modifications to our products require clearance of a new 510(k) or approval of a new PMA or PMA supplement, we may not be able to obtain those additional clearances or approvals for the modifications or additional indications in a timely manner, or at all. For those products sold in the EEA, we must notify the British Standards Institute, or BSI, our EEA Notified Body, if significant changes are made to the products or if there are substantial changes to our quality assurance systems affecting those products. Delays in obtaining required future clearances or approvals would adversely affect our ability to introduce new or enhanced products in a timely manner, which in turn would harm our future growth.

If we or our suppliers fail to comply with the FDA's Quality System Regulation or ISO Quality Management Systems, manufacturing of our products could be negatively impacted and sales of our products could suffer.

Our manufacturing practices must be in compliance with the FDA's 21 CFR Part 820 Quality System Regulation, or QSR, which governs the facilities, methods, controls, procedures, and records of the design, manufacture, packaging, labeling, storage, shipping, installation, and servicing of our products intended for human use. We are also subject to similar state and foreign requirements and licenses, including the MDD-93/42/EEC and the ISO 13485 Quality Management Systems, or QMS, standard applicable to medical devices. In addition, we must engage in regulatory reporting in the case of potential patient safety risks and must make available our manufacturing facilities, procedures, and records for periodic inspections and audits by governmental agencies, including the FDA, state authorities and comparable foreign agencies. If we fail to comply with the QSR, QMS, or other applicable regulations and standards, our operations could be disrupted and our manufacturing interrupted, and we may be subject to enforcement actions if our corrective and preventive actions are not adequate to ensure compliance.

Failure to take adequate corrective action in response to inspectional observations or any notice of deficiencies from a regulatory inspection or audit could result in partial or total shut-down of our manufacturing operations unless and until adequate corrections are implemented, voluntary or FDA-ordered recall, FDA seizure of affected devices, court-ordered injunction or consent decree that could impose additional regulatory oversight and significant requirements and limitations on our manufacturing operations, significant fines, suspension or withdrawal of marketing clearances and approvals, and criminal prosecutions, any of which would cause our business to suffer. Furthermore, our key component suppliers may not currently be or may not continue to be in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements, which may result in manufacturing delays for our products and cause our revenue to decline.

The FDA, BSI, Japan's Pharmaceutical & Medical Device Administration and other regulatory agencies and bodies have previously imposed inspections and audits on us, and may in the future impose additional inspections or audits at any time, which may conclude that our quality system is noncompliant with applicable regulations and standards. Such findings could potentially disrupt our business, harm our reputation and adversely affect our sales.

Our products may in the future be subject to product recalls or voluntary market withdrawals that could harm our reputation, business and financial results.

The FDA and similar foreign governmental authorities have the authority to require the recall of commercialized products in the event of material deficiencies or defects in design or manufacture that could affect patient safety. In the case of the FDA, the authority to require a recall must be based on an FDA finding that there is a reasonable probability that the device would cause serious adverse health consequences or death. Manufacturers may, under their own initiative, recall a product if any material deficiency in a device is found or suspected. For example, in 2010 we recalled our Xtract catheter in circumstances where no patient safety incident was reported but where we had evidence that the device's integrity could be compromised under certain storage conditions. A government-mandated recall or voluntary recall by us or one of our distributors could occur as a result of component failures, manufacturing errors, design or labeling defects or other issues. Recalls, which include corrections as well as removals, of any of our products would divert managerial and financial resources and could have an

adverse effect on our financial condition, harm our reputation with customers, and reduce our ability to achieve expected revenues.

We are required to comply with medical device reporting, or MDR, requirements and must report certain malfunctions, deaths, and serious injuries associated with our products, which can result in voluntary corrective actions or agency enforcement actions.

Under the FDA MDR regulations, medical device manufacturers are required to submit information to the FDA when they receive a report or become aware that a device has or may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or has or may have a malfunction that would likely cause or contribute to death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur. All manufacturers placing medical devices on the market in the EEA are legally bound to report any serious or potentially serious incidents involving devices they produce or sell to the Competent Authority in whose jurisdiction the incident occurred. Were this to happen to us, the relevant Competent Authority would file an initial report, and there would then be a further inspection or assessment if there were particular issues. This would be carried out either by the Competent Authority or it could require that the BSI, as the Notified Body, carry out the inspection or assessment.

Malfunction of our products could result in future voluntary corrective actions, such as recalls, including corrections, or customer notifications, or agency action, such as inspection or enforcement actions. Malfunctions have been reported to us in the past, and, while we investigated each of the incidents and believe we have taken the necessary corrective and preventive actions, we cannot guarantee that similar or different malfunctions will not occur in the future. If malfunctions do occur, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to correct the malfunctions adequately or prevent further malfunctions, in which case we may need to cease manufacture and distribution of the affected devices, initiate voluntary recalls, and redesign the devices; nor can we ensure that regulatory authorities will not take actions against us, such as ordering recalls, imposing fines, or seizing the affected devices. If someone is harmed by a malfunction or by product mishandling, we may be subject to product liability claims. Any corrective action, whether voluntary or involuntary, as well as defending ourselves in a lawsuit, will require the dedication of our time and capital, distract management from operating our business, and may harm our reputation and financial results.

We are subject to federal, state and foreign healthcare laws and regulations and implementation or changes to such healthcare laws and regulations could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

In an effort to contain rising healthcare costs, in March 2010, President Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act, collectively, the PPACA, which may significantly affect the payment for, and the availability of, healthcare services and result in fundamental changes to federal healthcare reimbursement programs. PPACA includes, among other things, the following measures:


•	a deductible 2.3% excise tax, with limited exceptions, on the sale of certain medical devices by the manufacturer of the device;


•	a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute intended to oversee, identify priorities in and conduct comparative clinical effectiveness research, along with funding for such research;

•

requirements to report certain financial arrangements with physicians and teaching hospitals, as defined in the PPACA and its implementing regulations, including reporting any payment or “transfer of value” made or distributed to teaching hospitals, prescribers, and other healthcare providers and reporting any ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members in applicable manufacturers during the preceding calendar year, with data collection required beginning August 1, 2013 and reporting to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services required by March 31, 2014 and the 90th day of each subsequent calendar year, and with disclosure of such information by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on a publicly available website beginning by September 2014; and


•	other measures designed to control Medicare spending.

An expansion in the government's role in the U.S. healthcare industry may cause general downward pressure on the prices of medical device products, lower reimbursements for procedures using our products, reduce medical procedure volumes and adversely affect our business and results of operations. Although we cannot predict the many ways that the federal healthcare reform laws might affect our business, sales of certain of our products became subject to the 2.3% excise tax beginning in 2013. It is unclear whether and to what extent, if at all, other anticipated developments resulting from the federal healthcare reform legislation, such as an increase in the number of people with health insurance and an increased focus on preventive medicine, may provide us additional revenue to offset this excise tax. If additional revenue does not materialize, or if our efforts to offset the excise tax through spending cuts or other actions are unsuccessful, the increased tax burden would adversely affect our financial performance, which in turn could cause the price of our stock to decline. In addition, a number of foreign governments are also considering or have adopted proposals to reform their healthcare systems. Because a significant portion of our revenues from our operations is derived internationally, if significant reforms are made to the healthcare systems in other jurisdictions, our sales and results of operations may be materially and adversely impacted.

We intend to market our products in a number of international markets. Although certain of our IVUS products have been approved for commercialization in Japan and in the EEA, in order to market our products in other foreign jurisdictions, we have had to, and will need to in the future, obtain separate regulatory approvals. The approval procedure varies among jurisdictions and can involve substantial additional testing. Approval or clearance of a device by the FDA does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions, and approval by one foreign regulatory authority does not ensure marketing authorization by regulatory authorities in other foreign jurisdictions or by the FDA. The foreign regulatory approval process may include all of the risks associated with obtaining FDA approval in addition to other risks. In addition, the time required to obtain foreign approval may differ from that required to obtain FDA approval, and we may not obtain foreign regulatory approvals on a timely basis, if at all. We may not be able to file for regulatory approvals and may not receive necessary approvals to commercialize our products in any foreign market other than in the EEA and Japan.

We may be subject to federal, state and foreign healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations, and a finding of failure to comply with such laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our operations may be directly or indirectly affected by various broad federal, state or foreign healthcare fraud and abuse laws. In particular, the federal healthcare program Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits any person from knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving remuneration, directly or indirectly, in return for or to induce the referring, ordering, leasing, purchasing or arranging for or recommending the ordering, purchasing or leasing of an item or service, for which payment may be made under federal healthcare programs, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs. This statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between device manufacturers on one hand and prescribers and purchasers on the other. For example, the government has sought to apply the Anti-Kickback Statute to device manufacturers' financial relationships with physician consultants. Among other theories, the government has alleged that such relationships are payments to induce the consultants to arrange for or recommend the ordering, purchasing or leasing of the manufacturers' products by the hospitals, medical institutions and other entities with whom they are affiliated. Although there are a number of statutory exemptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting certain common activities from prosecution or other regulatory sanctions, the exemptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly, and arrangements that involve remuneration that could induce prescribing, purchases, or recommendations may be subject to government scrutiny if they do not qualify for an exemption or a safe harbor. We are also subject to the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), which created federal criminal laws that prohibit executing a scheme to defraud any health care benefit program or making false statements relating to health care matters, and federal “sunshine” requirements to report certain financial arrangements with physicians and teaching hospitals, as defined in the PPACA and its implementing regulations, including reporting any payment or “transfer of value” made or distributed to teaching hospitals, prescribers, and other healthcare providers and reporting any ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members in applicable manufacturers.

Also, the federal False Claims Act prohibits persons from knowingly filing, or causing to be filed, a false claim to, or the knowing use of false statements to obtain payment from the federal government. Suits filed under the False Claims Act, known as “qui tam” actions, can be brought by any individual on behalf of the government and such individuals, commonly known as “whistleblowers,” may share in any amounts paid by the entity to the government in fines or settlement. When an entity is determined to have violated the False Claims Act, it may be required to pay up to three times the actual damages sustained by the government, plus civil penalties for each separate false claim. Various states have also enacted laws modeled after the federal False Claims Act.

In addition, several states have adopted laws similar to each of the above federal laws, such as anti-kickback and false claims laws which may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including commercial insurers as well as laws that restrict our marketing activities with physicians, and require us to report consulting and other payments to physicians. Some states, such as California, Connecticut, Massachusetts and Nevada, mandate implementation of commercial compliance programs to ensure compliance with these laws.

The risk of our being found in violation of these laws is increased by the fact that many of them have not been fully interpreted by the regulatory authorities or the courts, and their provisions are open to a variety of interpretations. Moreover, recent health care reform legislation has strengthened these laws. For example, the recently enacted PPACA, among other things, amends the intent requirement of the federal anti-kickback and criminal health care fraud statutes; a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of this statute or specific intent to violate it. In addition, the PPACA provides that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the False Claims Act. Further, we expect there will continue to be federal and state laws and/or regulations, proposed and implemented, that could impact our operations and business. The extent to which future legislation or regulations, if any, relating to health care fraud abuse laws and/or enforcement, may be enacted or what effect such legislation or regulation would have on our business remains uncertain. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above or any other governmental regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from participating in governmental health care programs, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our financial results.

We also are subject to foreign fraud and abuse laws, which vary by country. For instance, in the European Union, legislation on inducements offered to physicians and other healthcare workers or hospitals differ from country to country. Breach of the laws relating to such inducements may expose us to the imposition of criminal sanctions. It may also harm our reputation, which could in turn affect sales.

In November 2012, we became aware through newspaper reports in the Italian media that a former employee of ours was under criminal investigation for an alleged violation of Italian anti-bribery laws. The Italian public prosecutor is alleging that the approximately 5,000 euro that we paid to an Italian state-employed physician for conducting a training session was paid in an effort to influence the outcome of a clinical trial. Although we dispute these allegations, if we are unsuccessful in our defense, we may be faced with fines, penalties and a debarment from creating new contractual relationships with hospitals that are part of the Italian national health system. As a result, we cannot assure you that the outcome of this investigation would not have material adverse effects to our business in Italy, or harm our reputation in Europe generally, which could negatively affect our sales.

If our customers are unable to obtain coverage of or sufficient reimbursement for procedures performed with our products, it is unlikely that our products will be widely used.

Successful sales of our products depend on the availability of coverage and adequate reimbursement from third-party payors. Healthcare providers that purchase medical devices for treatment of their patients generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the costs and fees associated with the procedures performed with these devices. Both public and private insurance coverage and reimbursement plans are central to new product acceptance. Customers are unlikely to use our products if they do not receive reimbursement adequate to cover the cost of our products and related procedures.

To the extent we sell our products internationally, market acceptance may depend, in part, upon the availability of coverage and reimbursement within prevailing healthcare payment systems. Coverage, reimbursement, and healthcare payment systems in international markets vary significantly by country, and by region in some countries, and include both government-sponsored healthcare and private insurance. We may not obtain international reimbursement approvals in a timely manner, if at all. Our failure to receive international coverage or reimbursement approvals would negatively impact market acceptance of our products in the international markets in which those approvals are sought.

To date, our products have generally been covered as part of procedures for which reimbursement has been available. However, in the United States, as well as in foreign countries, government-funded programs (such as Medicare and Medicaid) or private insurance programs, together commonly known as third-party payors, pay the cost of a significant portion of a patient's medical expenses. Coverage of and reimbursement for medical technology can differ significantly from payor to payor.

All third-party coverage and reimbursement programs, whether government funded or insured commercially, whether inside the United States or outside, are developing increasingly sophisticated methods of controlling healthcare costs. Such cost-containment programs adopted by third-party payors, including legislative and regulatory changes to coverage and reimbursement policies, could potentially limit the amount which healthcare providers are willing to pay for medical devices, or related testing, which could adversely impact our business. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has announced various efforts to reduce costs in connection with the Medicare program that could have spillover into our business, including for example: (1) a three-year demonstration project that began September 2012, to allow Medicare recovery auditors to audit Medicare payments for procedures prior to Medicare making payment for the procedure, versus following Medicare payment for the procedure as has historically been Medicare's process, and (2) a proposed process to adjust provider payments amounts (with adjustments beginning January 2016) for certain laboratory tests based on changes in technology (historically, the payment for such tests would not typically be adjusted except for annual inflationary and productivity adjustments).

We believe that future coverage of and reimbursement for our products may be subject to increased restrictions both in the U.S. and in international markets. For example, on August 2, 2011, President Obama signed the Budget Control Act of 2011, which imposed significant cuts in federal spending over the next decade. Such cuts in federal spending could impact entitlement programs such as Medicare and aid to states for Medicaid programs. Third-party reimbursement and coverage for our products may not be available or adequate in either the U.S. or international markets. Future legislation, regulations, coverage or reimbursement policies adopted by third-party payors may adversely affect the growth of the markets for our products, reduce the demand for our existing products or our products currently under development and limit our ability to sell our products on a profitable basis.

We may be subject to health information privacy and security standards that include penalties for noncompliance.

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, and its implementing regulations safeguard the privacy and security of individually-identifiable health information. Certain of our operations may be subject to these requirements. Penalties for noncompliance with these rules include both criminal and civil penalties. In addition, the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or HITECH Act, expanded federal health information privacy

and security protections. Among other things, HITECH makes certain of HIPAA's privacy and security standards directly applicable to “business associates”-independent contractors or agents of covered entities that create, receive, maintain or transmit protected health information in connection with providing a service for or on behalf of a covered entity. HITECH also set forth new notification requirements for health data security breaches, increased the civil and criminal penalties that may be imposed against covered entities, business associates and possibly other persons, and gave state attorneys general new authority to enforce HIPAA and seek attorney's fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions. While we do not believe we are a covered entity or a business associate under HIPAA, if we provide services or perform functions where we could have incidental access to protected health information, we would be obligated to protect any protected health information that we may receive in the field in accordance with HIPAA and HITECH.

Compliance with environmental laws and regulations could be expensive, and failure to comply with these laws and regulations could subject us to significant liability.

We use hazardous materials in our research and development and manufacturing processes, including specifically the sterilization processes conducted at our Costa Rica facility. We are subject to foreign, federal, state and local regulations governing use, storage, handling and disposal of these materials and associated waste products. We are currently licensed to handle such materials, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to retain these licenses in the future or obtain licenses under new regulations if and when they are required by governing authorities. We cannot completely eliminate the risk of contamination, injury, or even death resulting from such hazardous materials, and we may incur liability as a result of any such contamination, injury or death. In the event of an accident, we could be held liable for damages or penalized with fines, and the liability could exceed our resources and any applicable insurance. We have also incurred and may continue to incur expenses related to compliance with environmental laws. Such future expenses or liability could have a significant negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, we cannot assure that the cost of compliance with these laws and regulations will not materially increase in the future. We may also incur expenses related to ensuring that our operations comply with environmental laws related to our operations, and those of prior owners or operators of our properties, at current or former manufacturing sites where operations have previously resulted in spills, discharges or other releases of hazardous substances into the environment. We could be held strictly liable under U.S. environmental laws for contamination of property that we currently or formerly owned or operated without regard to fault or whether our actions were in compliance with law at the time. Our liability could also increase if other responsible parties, including prior owners or operators of our facilities, fail to complete their clean-up obligations or satisfy indemnification obligations to us. Similarly, if we fail to ensure compliance with applicable environmental laws in foreign jurisdictions in which we operate, we may not be able to offer our products and may be subject to civil or criminal liabilities.

The use, misuse or off-label use of our products may result in injuries that could lead to product liability suits, which could be costly to our business.

Our currently marketed products have been cleared by the relevant regulatory authority in each jurisdiction where we market them. There may be increased risk of injury if physicians attempt to use our products in procedures outside of those indications cleared or approved for use, known as off-label use. Our sales force is trained according to company policy not to promote our products for off-label uses, and in our instructions for use in all markets we specify that our products are not intended for use outside of those indications cleared for use. However, we cannot prevent a physician from using our products for off-label applications. Our catheters and guide wires are intended to be single-procedure products. In spite of clear labeling and instructions against reuse, we are aware that certain physicians have elected to reuse our products. Reuse of our catheters and guide wires may increase the risk of product liability claims. Reuse may also subject the party reusing the product to regulatory authority inspection and enforcement action. Physicians may also misuse our product if they are not adequately trained, potentially leading to injury and an increased risk of product liability. If our products are defectively designed, manufactured or labeled, contain defective components or are misused, we may become subject to costly litigation by our customers or their patients. Product liability claims could divert management's attention from our core business, be expensive to defend and result in sizable damage awards against us.

Risks Related to our Intellectual Property and Litigation

Our ability to protect our intellectual property and proprietary technology through patents and other means is uncertain.

Our success depends significantly on our ability to protect our intellectual property and proprietary technologies. Our policy is to obtain and protect our intellectual property rights. We rely on patent protection, as well as a combination of copyright, trade secret and trademark laws, and nondisclosure, confidentiality and other contractual restrictions to protect our proprietary technology. However, these legal means afford only limited protection and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep any competitive advantage. Our pending U.S. and foreign patent applications may not issue as patents or may not issue in a form that will be advantageous to us. Any patents we have obtained or will obtain may be challenged by re-examination, inter partes or other post-grant review, opposition or other administrative proceeding, or in litigation. Such challenges could result in a determination that the patent is invalid. Some of our older patents have expired or will expire in the

near future. In addition, competitors may be able to design alternative methods or devices that avoid infringement of our patents. To the extent our intellectual property protection offers inadequate protection, or is found to be invalid, we are exposed to a greater risk of direct competition. If our intellectual property does not provide adequate protection against our competitors' products, our competitive position could be adversely affected, as could our business. Both the patent application process and the process of managing patent disputes can be time consuming and expensive. Furthermore, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.

In addition to pursuing patents on our technology, we have taken steps to protect our intellectual property and proprietary technology by entering into confidentiality agreements and intellectual property assignment agreements with our employees, consultants, corporate partners and, when needed, our advisors. Such agreements may not be enforceable or may not provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets or other proprietary information in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure or other breaches of the agreements, and we may not be able to prevent such unauthorized disclosure. Monitoring unauthorized disclosure is difficult, and we do not know whether the steps we have taken to prevent such disclosure are, or will be, adequate.

In the event a competitor infringes upon our patent or other intellectual property rights, litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights or to defend our patents against challenge, even if successful, could be expensive and time consuming and could require significant time and attention from our management. We may not have sufficient resources to enforce our intellectual property rights or to defend our patents against challenges from others.

The medical device industry is characterized by patent and other intellectual property litigation, and we could become subject to litigation that could be costly, result in the diversion of our management's time and efforts, require us to pay damages or prevent us from selling our products.

The medical device industry is characterized by extensive litigation and interference and other administrative proceedings over patent and other intellectual property rights. Whether or not a product infringes a patent involves complex legal and factual issues, the determination of which is often uncertain. Our competitors may assert that they own U.S. or foreign patents containing claims that cover our products, their components or the methods we employ in the manufacture or use of our products. For example, we are currently involved with St. Jude Medical in patent litigation regarding our FFR products and whether these products infringe a St. Jude Medical patent. Because patent applications can take many years to issue and in many instances at least 18 months to publish, there may be applications now pending of which we are unaware, which may later result in issued patents that contain claims that cover our products. There could also be existing patents, of which we are unaware, that contain claims that cover one or more components of our products. As the number of participants in our industry increases, the possibility of patent infringement claims against us also increases.

Any interference proceeding, litigation or other assertion of claims against us, including our current patent litigation with St. Jude Medical, may cause us to incur substantial costs, could place a significant strain on our financial resources, divert the attention of our management from our core business and harm our reputation. If the relevant patents asserted against us were upheld as valid and enforceable and were found to be infringed, we could be required to pay substantial damages and/or royalties and could be prevented from selling our products unless we could obtain a license or were able to redesign our products to avoid infringement. Any such license may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all. If we fail to obtain any required licenses or make any necessary changes to our products or technologies, we may be unable to make, use, sell or otherwise commercialize one or more of our products in the affected country. In addition, if we are found to infringe willfully, we could be required to pay treble damages and attorney fees, among other penalties.

We expect to enter new product fields in the future. Entering such additional fields may subject us to claims of infringement. Defending any infringement claims would be expensive and time consuming.

We are aware of certain third-party U.S. patents in fields that we are targeting for development. We do not have licenses to these patents nor do we believe that such licenses are required to develop, commercialize or sell our products in these areas. However, the owners of these patents may initiate a lawsuit alleging infringement of one or more of these or other patents. If they do, we may be required to incur substantial costs related to patent litigation, which could place a significant strain on our financial resources and divert the attention of management from our business and harm our reputation. Adverse determinations in such litigation could cause us to redesign or prevent us from manufacturing or selling our products in these areas, which would have an adverse effect on our business by limiting our ability to generate revenues through the sale of these products.

From time to time in the ordinary course of business, we receive letters from third parties advising us of third-party patents that may relate to our business. The letters do not explicitly seek any particular action or relief from us. Although these letters do not threaten legal action, these letters may be deemed to put us on notice that continued operation of our business might infringe intellectual property rights of third parties. We do not believe we are infringing any such third-party rights, and, other than the matters described in Note 4 "Commitments and Contingencies - Litigation" to our consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we are unaware of any litigation or other

proceedings having been commenced against us asserting such infringement. We cannot assure you that such litigation or other proceedings asserting infringement by us may not be commenced against us in the future.

Our rights to a worldwide license of certain IVUS patents owned or licensed by Boston Scientific may be challenged.

The marketing and sale of our current rotational IVUS catheters and pullback products depend on a license for IVUS-related patents owned or licensed by Boston Scientific. Boston Scientific was required to transfer the related intellectual property rights pursuant to a 1995 order of the Federal Trade Commission. We obtained rights to the license in 2003 through our former wholly-owned subsidiary, Pacific Rim Medical Ventures, which merged into us on December 30, 2004. In the event Boston Scientific disputes our rights to the license or seeks to terminate the license, we may be required to expend significant time and resources defending our rights. An adverse determination could cause us to redesign or prevent us from manufacturing or selling our rotational IVUS catheters and pullback products, which would have an adverse effect on our business. Additionally, in the event that the chain of title from the 1995 transfer of rights from Boston Scientific through the 2003 transfer to us is successfully challenged, we may have fewer rights to the technology than our business requires which will negatively impact our ability to continue our development of rotational IVUS catheters and pullback products or subject us to disputes with Boston Scientific or others with respect to the incorporation of this intellectual property into our products.

Our VH IVUS business depends on a license from The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, the loss of which would severely impact our business.

The marketing and sale of our VH IVUS functionality for IVUS depends on an exclusive license to patents owned by The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, the license to which we obtained in April 2002. We are aware that maintenance of the license depends upon certain provisions being met by us including payment of royalties, commercialization of the licensed technology and obtaining regulatory clearances or approvals. If The Cleveland Clinic Foundation were to claim that we committed a material breach or default of these provisions and we were not able to cure such breach or default, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation would have a right to terminate the agreement. The loss of the rights granted under the agreement could require us to redesign our VH IVUS functionality or prevent us from manufacturing or selling our IVUS products containing VH IVUS in countries covered by these patents. In addition, our exclusive license will become non-exclusive if we fail to obtain regulatory clearances or approvals to commercialize the licensed technology within a proscribed time period. The cost of redesigning or an inability to sell our VH IVUS products would have a negative impact on our ability to grow our business and achieve our expected revenues.

Risks Related to our Common Stock

We expect that the price of our common stock will fluctuate substantially.

The market price of our common stock could be subject to significant fluctuation. Factors that could cause volatility in the market price of our common stock include the following:


•	changes in earnings estimates, investors' perceptions, recommendations by securities analysts or our failure to achieve analysts' earnings estimates;


•	changes in foreign currency exchange rates;


•	quarterly variations in our or our competitors' results of operations;


•	changes in governmental regulations or in the status of our regulatory clearance or approvals;


•	changes in availability of third-party reimbursement in the United States or other countries;


•	the announcement of new products or product enhancements by us or our competitors or other developments involving our respective products;


•	the announcement of an acquisition or other business combination or strategic transaction;


•	possible sales of our common stock by investors who view the 2015 Notes and the 2017 Notes as a more attractive means of equity participation in us;


•	the conversion of some or all of the 2015 Notes or the 2017 Notes and any sales in the public market of shares of our common stock issued upon conversion of the 2015 Notes or the 2017 Notes;


•	hedging or arbitrage trading activity that may develop involving our common stock, including in connection with the convertible note hedge transactions and warrant transactions we entered into in connection with the offerings of our 2015 Notes and 2017 Notes, and arbitrage strategies employed or that may be employed by investors in our 2015 Notes and 2017 Notes;


•	announcements related to patents issued to us or our competitors;


•	the announcement of pending or threatened litigation and developments in litigation involving us;


•	sales of large blocks of our common stock, including sales by our executive officers and directors; and


•	general market and economic conditions and other factors unrelated to our operating performance or the operating performance of our competitors.

These factors may materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Additional equity issuances or a sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

If our existing stockholders sell a substantial number of shares of our common stock or the public market perceives that existing stockholders might sell shares of our common stock, the market price of our common stock could decline. In addition, sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock could make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem reasonable or appropriate. Because we may need to raise additional capital in the future to continue to expand our business and develop new products, we may, among other things, conduct additional equity offerings. These future equity issuances, together with any additional shares of our common stock issued or issuable in connection with past or any future acquisitions, would result in further dilution to investors and could depress the market price of our common stock.

No prediction can be made regarding the number of shares of our common stock that may be issued or the effect that the future sales of shares of our common stock will have on the market price of our shares.

*Our directors, officers and principal stockholders have significant voting power and may take actions that may not be in the best interests of our other stockholders.

As of June 30, 2014, our directors, officers and principal stockholders (those holding more than 5% of our common stock) collectively controlled a significant portion of our outstanding common stock. To the extent our directors, officers and principal stockholders continue to hold a significant portion of our outstanding common stock, these stockholders, if they act together, would be able to exert significant influence over the management and affairs of our company and most matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control, might adversely affect the market price of our common stock and may not be in the best interests of our other stockholders.

Anti-takeover provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws and other agreements and in Delaware law could discourage a takeover.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions that might enable our management to resist a takeover. These provisions include:


•	a classified board of directors;


•	advance notice requirements to stockholders for matters to be brought at stockholder meetings;


•	a supermajority stockholder vote requirement for amending certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws; and


•	the right to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval, which could be used to dilute the stock ownership of a potential hostile acquirer.

We are also subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law that, in general, prohibit any business combination or merger with a beneficial owner of 15% or more of our common stock unless the holder's acquisition of our stock was approved in advance by our board of directors. These provisions might discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company or a change in our management. The existence of these provisions could adversely affect the voting power of holders of common stock and limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.

We have adopted a stockholder rights plan that may discourage, delay or prevent a change of control and make any future unsolicited acquisition attempt more difficult. Under the rights plan:


•	the rights will become exercisable only upon the occurrence of certain events specified in the plan, including the acquisition of 20% of our outstanding common stock by a person or group, with limited exceptions;


•	each right will entitle the holder, other than an acquiring person, to acquire shares of our common stock at a discount to the then prevailing market price;


•	our board of directors may redeem outstanding rights at any time prior to a person becoming an acquiring person at a minimal price per right; and


•	prior to a person becoming an acquiring person, the terms of the rights may be amended by our board of directors without the approval of the holders of the rights.

In addition, the terms of our 2015 Notes and 2017 Notes may require us to purchase those notes for cash in the event of a takeover of our company. The indentures governing the Notes also prohibit us from engaging in certain mergers or acquisitions unless, among other things, the surviving entity assumes our obligations under such notes. These and other provisions

applicable to the 2015 Notes and 2017 Notes may have the effect of delaying or preventing a takeover of our company that would otherwise be beneficial to our stockholders

We have not paid dividends in the past and do not expect to pay dividends in the future.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain all future earnings for the operation and expansion of our business and, therefore, do not anticipate declaring or paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our results of operations, capital requirements, financial condition, prospects, contractual arrangements, any limitations on payments of dividends present in our current and future debt agreements, and other factors our board of directors may deem relevant. If we do not pay dividends, a return on our common stock will only occur if our stock price appreciates.



Item 6.	Exhibits



Exhibit Number		Description

2.1+		Amendment and Plan of Merger by and Among Volcano Corporation, Athena Sub, Inc, AtheroMed, Inc. and Fortis Advisors LLC, solely in its capacity as Securityholder's Representative (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-52045), as originally filed on July 17, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.1		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-52045), as originally filed on August 9, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.2		Bylaws of the Registrant, as revised (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-52045), as originally filed on August 8, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.3		Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-52045), as originally filed on August 9, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.1		Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3.

4.2		Specimen Common Stock certificate of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, as amended (File No. 333-132678), as originally filed on May 24, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.3		Fourth Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, dated February 18, 2005, by and among the Registrant and certain stockholders (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-132678), as originally filed on March 24, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.4		Rights Agreement, dated June 20, 2006, by and between the Registrant and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-52045), as originally filed on August 9, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.5		Indenture, dated September 20, 2010, by and between the Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-52045), as originally filed on September 20, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.6		Supplemental Indenture, dated September 20, 2010 by and between Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-52045), as originally filed on September 20 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.7		Form of 2.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-52045), as originally filed on September 20, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.8		Second Supplemental Indenture, dated December 10, 2012, by and between Volcano Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-52045), as originally filed on December 10, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.9		Form of 1.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-52045), as originally filed on December 10, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).

31.1		Certification of the President & Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

31.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

32.1**		Certification of the President & Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2**		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS***		XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH***		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.



101.CAL***		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF***		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB***		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE***		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.



*	Management contract or compensatory pan or arrangement.



**	The certifications attached as Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 accompany this quarterly report on Form 10-Q pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



***	Pursuant to applicable securities laws and regulations, we are deemed to have complied with the reporting obligation relating to the submission of interactive data files in such exhibits and are not subject to liability under any anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws as long as we have made a good faith attempt to comply with the submission requirements and promptly amend the interactive data files after becoming aware that the interactive data files fail to comply with the submission requirements. Users of this data are advised that, pursuant to Rule 460T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed and otherwise are not subject to liability.



+	Text omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment requested under 17 C.F.R. Sections 200.80(b)(4) and 240.24b-2.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



Signature	Title	Date

/s/ John T. Dahldorf	Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and duly authorized officer)	August 8, 2014
John T. Dahldorf		August 8, 2014

EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit Number		Description

2.1+		Amendment and Plan of Merger by and Among Volcano Corporation, Athena Sub, Inc, AtheroMed, Inc. and Fortis Advisors LLC, solely in its capacity as Securityholder's Representative (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-52045), as originally filed on July 17, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.1		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-52045), as originally filed on August 9, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.2		Bylaws of the Registrant, as revised (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-52045), as originally filed on August 8, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.3		Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-52045), as originally filed on August 9, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.1		Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3.

4.2		Specimen Common Stock certificate of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, as amended (File No. 333-132678), as originally filed on May 24, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.3		Fourth Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, dated February 18, 2005, by and among the Registrant and certain stockholders (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-132678), as originally filed on March 24, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.4		Rights Agreement, dated June 20, 2006, by and between the Registrant and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-52045), as originally filed on August 9, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.5		Indenture, dated September 20, 2010, by and between the Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-52045), as originally filed on September 20, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.6		Supplemental Indenture, dated September 20, 2010 by and between Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-52045), as originally filed on September 20 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.7		Form of 2.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-52045), as originally filed on September 20, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.8		Second Supplemental Indenture, dated December 10, 2012, by and between Volcano Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-52045), as originally filed on December 10, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.9		Form of 1.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-52045), as originally filed on December 10, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).

31.1		Certification of the President & Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

31.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

32.1**		Certification of the President & Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2**		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS***		XBRL Instance Document.



101.SCH***		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL***		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF***		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB***		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE***		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.



*	Management contract or compensatory pan or arrangement.



**	The certifications attached as Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 accompany this quarterly report on Form 10-Q pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



***	Pursuant to applicable securities laws and regulations, we are deemed to have complied with the reporting obligation relating to the submission of interactive data files in such exhibits and are not subject to liability under any anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws as long as we have made a good faith attempt to comply with the submission requirements and promptly amend the interactive data files after becoming aware that the interactive data files fail to comply with the submission requirements. Users of this data are advised that, pursuant to Rule 460T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed and otherwise are not subject to liability.



+	Text omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment requested under 17 C.F.R. Sections 200.80(b)(4) and 240.24b-2.

Large accelerated filer þ

Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨

Smaller reporting company ¨

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)