UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014.

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     .

Commission file number: 333-133895

 

AFFINION GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

6 High Ridge Park

Stamford, CT 06905

(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)

(203) 956-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No   x

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value, as of July 30, 2014 was 100.

 

 

 

 

 

---

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

i

---

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

AFFINION GROUP, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF JUNE 30, 2014 AND DECEMBER 31, 2013

(In millions, except share amounts)

 

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

1

---

AFFINION GROUP, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 AND 2013

(In millions)

 

 

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

2

---

AFFINION GROUP, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN DEFICIT

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 AND 2013

(In millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

3

---

AFFINION GROUP, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 AND 2013

(In millions)

 

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

4

---

AFFINION GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

 

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND BUSINESS DESCRIPTION

Basis of Presentation—On October 17, 2005, Cendant Corporation (“Cendant”) completed the sale of the Cendant Marketing Services Division (the “Predecessor”) to Affinion Group, Inc. (the “Company” or “Affinion”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. (“Affinion Holdings”) and an affiliate of Apollo Global Management, LLC (“Apollo”), pursuant to a purchase agreement dated July 26, 2005 for approximately $1.8 billion (the “Apollo Transactions”).

All references to Cendant refer to Cendant Corporation, which changed its name to Avis Budget Group, Inc. in August 2006, and its consolidated subsidiaries, specifically in the context of its business and operations prior to, and in connection with, the Company’s separation from Cendant.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts and transactions of the Company. In presenting these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and related disclosures, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Estimates, by their nature, are based on judgments and available information at the time such estimate is made. As such, actual results could differ from those estimates. In management’s opinion, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of interim results reported. The results of operations reported for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the entire year or any subsequent interim period.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and following the guidance of Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X for interim financial statements required to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). As permitted under such rules, certain notes and other financial information normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted; however, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do include such notes and financial information sufficient so as to make the interim information presented not misleading. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes of the Company as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the SEC on February 27, 2014 (the “Form 10-K”).

Business Description—The Company is a global leader in the designing, marketing and servicing of comprehensive customer engagement and loyalty solutions that enhance and extend the relationship of millions of consumers with many of the largest and most respected companies in the world. Generally, the Company partners with these leading companies in two ways: 1) by developing and marketing programs that are natural extensions of the brand images of the Company’s partner companies and provide valuable services to their end-customers, and 2) by providing the back-end technological support and redemption services for points-based loyalty programs. The Company refers to the companies that it works with to provide customer engagement and loyalty solutions as its marketing partners or clients. The Company refers to the consumers to whom it provides services directly under a contractual relationship as subscribers or members. The Company refers to those consumers that it services on behalf of a third party, such as one of its marketing partners, and with whom it has a contractual relationship as end-customers.

The Company utilizes its expertise in a variety of direct engagement media to market valuable products and services to the customers of its marketing partners on a highly targeted campaign basis. The selection of the media employed in a campaign corresponds to the preferences and expectations the targeted customers have demonstrated for transacting with the Company’s marketing partners, as the Company believes this optimizes response, thereby improving the efficiency of the Company’s marketing investment. Accordingly, the Company maintains significant capabilities to market through direct mail, point-of-sale, direct response television, the internet, inbound and outbound telephony and voice response unit marketing, as well as other media as needed.

The Company designs customer engagement and loyalty solutions with an attractive suite of benefits and ease of usage that it believes are likely to interest and engage consumers based on their needs and interests. For example, the Company provides discount travel services, credit monitoring and identity-theft resolution, accidental death and dismemberment insurance (“AD&D”), roadside assistance, various checking account and credit card enhancement services, loyalty program design and management, disaggregated loyalty points redemptions for gift cards, travel and merchandise, as well as other products and services.

Affinion North America. Affinion North America comprises the Company’s Membership, Insurance and Package, and Loyalty customer engagement businesses in North America.

5

---

Affinion International. Affinion International comprises the Company’s Membership and Package customer engagement businesses outside North America and a discrete loyalty program benefit provider. The Company has not offered AD&D or related insurance programs outside North America since 2000. The Company expects to leverage its current international operational platform to expand its range of products and services, develop new marketing partner relationships in various industries and grow its geographical footprint.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

On May 28, 2014, the FASB and International Accounting Standards Board issued their final standard on revenue from contracts with customers. The standard outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The fundamental principles of the new guidance are that companies should recognize revenue in a manner that reflects the timing of transfer of goods and services to customers and the amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration that a company expects to receive for the goods and services provided. The new guidance establishes a five-step approach for the recognition of revenue. In addition, the new guidance will also require significantly expanded disclosures about revenue recognition. Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or modified retrospective approach. For public entities, the new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods (including interim reporting periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is not permitted. The Company is in the process of performing an initial evaluation of the impact of the new guidance. Based on its preliminary assessment, the Company does not believe that adoption of the new guidance will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

 

2. ACQUISITIONS

On November 14, 2012, the Company entered into, and consummated, a Share Sale and Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) that resulted in the acquisition of Boyner Bireysel Urunler Satis ve Pazarlama A.S (“Back-Up”), a Turkish provider of assistance and consultancy services to its members, and a sister company, Bofis Turizm ve Ticaret A.S. (“Travel”), a Turkish travel agency. In accordance with the Agreement, on November 14, 2012, the Company acquired 90% of the outstanding capital stock of Back-Up and 99.99% of the outstanding capital stock of Travel for an upfront cash payment of approximately $12.5 million and contingent consideration payable ratably on each of the first three anniversaries of the acquisition date aggregating approximately $8.4 million. The Company also obtained a call option that grants the Company the ability to call the additional 10% of Back-Up’s capital stock for a nominal price no earlier than five years after the acquisition date and no later than eight years after the acquisition date. The Company also issued a put option to the former shareholders of Back-Up permitting the former shareholders to put the additional 10% of Back-Up capital stock to the Company under the same terms as the call option.

Back-Up and Travel were owned by Turkey’s largest retail group and the Company believes that Back-Up’s and Travel’s assistance and concierge service model fits well with the Company’s global product offerings. The acquisition enables the Company to expand into Turkey, which the Company deems a key market, given both its size as well as the attractive demographics of its population, and enables the expansion of the Company’s product offerings to a new customer base.

6

---

The Company allocated the purchase price of $19.0 million, consisting of the upfront cash payment of $12.5 million and the acquisition date fair value of the $8.4 million contingent consideration payable over three years, based on an income approach and probability model, at the present value of $6.5 million, among the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows (in millions):

 

The intangible assets are comprised principally of trade names ($5.1 million), which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over weighted-average useful lives of ten years, and member relationships ($3.7 million), which are being amortized on an accelerated basis over weighted-average useful lives of eight years. The goodwill, which is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes, has been attributed to the International Products segment. In connection with the acquisition of Back-Up and Travel, the Company incurred $0.8 million of acquisition costs, of which $0.1 million was recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and included in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

 

 

3. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets consisted of:

 

 

Foreign currency translation resulted in an increase in both intangible assets and accumulated amortization of $0.8 million from December 31, 2013 to June 30, 2014.

7

---

Amortization expense relating to intangible assets was as follows:

 

Based on the Company’s amortizable intangible assets as of June 30, 2014, the Company expects the related amortization expense for fiscal year 2014 and the four succeeding fiscal years to be approximately $59.4 million in 2014, $40.9 million in 2015, $11.9 million in 2016, $7.7 million in 2017 and $7.1 million in 2018.

At January 1, 2014 and June 30, 2014, the Company had gross goodwill of $653.3 million and $654.3 million, respectively, and accumulated impairment losses of $47.0 million at both dates. The accumulated impairment losses represent the $15.5 million impairment loss recognized in 2006 impairing all of the goodwill assigned to the Loyalty Products segment related to the Apollo Transactions and the $31.5 million impairment loss recognized in 2012 impairing all of the goodwill assigned to the Membership Products segment related to the Prospectiv acquisition.

The changes in the Company’s carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2013 and the six months ended June 30, 2014 are as follows:

 

 

4. CONTRACT RIGHTS AND LIST FEES, NET

Contract rights and list fees consisted of:

 

Amortization expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 was $1.4 million and $2.9 million, respectively, of which $1.3 million and $2.7 million, respectively, is included in marketing expense and $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, is included in depreciation and amortization expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income. Amortization expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was $1.6 million and $3.1 million, respectively, of which $1.5 million and $2.9 million, respectively, is included in marketing expense and $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, is included in depreciation and amortization expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income. Based on the Company’s contract rights and list fees as of June 30, 2014, the Company expects the related amortization expense for fiscal year 2014 and the four succeeding fiscal years to be approximately $5.6 million in 2014, $4.6 million in 2015, $3.4 million in 2016, $2.2 million in 2017 and $1.8 million in 2018.

 

8

---

 

5. LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consisted of:

 

On April 9, 2010, the Company, as Borrower, and Affinion Holdings entered into a $1.0 billion amended and restated senior secured credit facility with its lenders (“Affinion Credit Facility”). On November 20, 2012, the Company, as Borrower, and Affinion Holdings entered into an amendment to the Affinion Credit Facility, which (i) increased the margins on LIBOR loans from 3.50% to 5.00% and on base rate loans from 2.50% to 4.00%, (ii) replaced the financial covenant requiring the Company to maintain a maximum consolidated leverage ratio with a financial covenant requiring Affinion to maintain a maximum senior secured leverage ratio, and (iii) adjusted the ratios under the financial covenant requiring Affinion to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio. On December 12, 2013, in connection with the refinancing of the Company’s 11 ½ % senior subordinated notes due 2015 (the “2006 senior subordinated notes”) and Affinion Holdings’ 11.625% senior notes due 2015 (the Affinion Holdings’ “2010 senior notes”), the Company, as Borrower, and Affinion Holdings entered into an amendment to the Affinion Credit Facility, which (i) provided permission for the consummation of the exchange offers for the Company’s 2006 senior subordinated notes and Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes; (ii) removed the springing maturity provisions applicable to the term loan facility; (iii) modified the senior secured leverage ratio financial covenant in the Affinion Credit Facility; (iv) provided additional flexibility to make dividends to Affinion Holdings to be used by Affinion Holdings to make certain payments with respect to its indebtedness and to repay, repurchase or redeem subordinated indebtedness of Affinion; and (v) increased the interest rate margins by 0.25%, to 5.25% on LIBOR loans and 4.25% on base rate loans. The amendment became effective upon the satisfaction of the conditions precedent set forth therein, including the payment by Affinion of the consent fee equal to 0.25% of the sum of (i) the aggregate principal amount of all term loans and (ii) the revolving loan commitments in effect, in each case, held by each lender that entered into the amendment on the date of effectiveness of the amendment. On May 20, 2014, the Company, as Borrower, and Affinion Holdings entered into an amendment to the Affinion Credit Facility, which (i) extended the maturity to April 30, 2018 of $775.0 million in aggregate principal amount of existing senior secured term loans and existing senior secured revolving loans, which loans were designated as first lien term loans (the “First Lien Term Loans”), (ii) extended the maturity to October 31, 2018 of $377.9 million in aggregate principal amount of existing senior secured term loans on a second lien senior secured basis, which, together with additional borrowings obtained on the same terms, total $425.0 million (the “Second Lien Term Loan”), (iii) extended the maturity to January 29, 2018 of $80.0 million of the commitments (and related obligations) under the existing senior secured revolving credit facility on a first lien senior secured basis, (iv) reduced the commitments under the existing senior secured revolving credit facility by $85.0 million and (v) removed the existing financial covenant requiring the Company to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio.  The revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility and a swingline loan subfacility. The First Lien Term Loan facility matures in April 2018 and the Second Lien Term Loan facility matures in October 2018. The First Lien Term Loan facility provides for quarterly amortization payments totaling 1% per annum, with the balance payable upon the final maturity date. The Second Lien Term Loan facility does not provide for quarterly amortization payments. The Affinion Credit Facility also requires mandatory prepayments of the outstanding term loans based on excess cash flow (as defined), if any, and the proceeds from certain specified transactions. The interest rates with respect to First Lien Term Loans and revolving loans under the amended Affinion Credit Facility are based on, at the Company’s option, (a) the higher of (i) adjusted LIBOR and (ii) 1.50%, in each case plus 5.25%, or (b) the highest of (i) Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas’ prime rate, (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% and (iii) 2.50% (“ABR”), in each case plus 4.25%. The interest rates with respect to Second Lien Term Loans under the amended Affinion Credit Facility are based on, at the Company’s

9

---

option, (a) the higher of (i) adjusted LIBOR and (ii) 1.50%, in each case plus 7.00%, or (b) the highest of (i) Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas’ prime rate, (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% and (iii) 2.50% (“ABR”), in each case plus 6.00%. The weighted average interest rate on the term loan for the periods from April 1, 2014 through May 20, 2014 and from January 1, 2014 through May 20, 2014 was 6.75%  and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was 6.5% per annum for both periods. The weighted average interest rate on the First Lien Term Loan and Second Lien Term Loan for the period from May 20, 2014 through June 30, 2014 was 6.75% and 8.50%, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on revolving credit facility borrowings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 was 7.1% for both periods and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was 7.3% for both periods. The Company’s obligations under the credit facility are, and the Company’s obligations under any interest rate protection or other hedging arrangements entered into with a lender or any of its affiliates will be, guaranteed by Affinion Holdings and by each of the Company’s existing and subsequently acquired or organized domestic subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions. The Affinion Credit Facility is secured to the extent legally permissible by substantially all of the assets of (i) Affinion Holdings, which consists of a pledge of all the Company’s capital stock and (ii) the Company and the subsidiary guarantors, including but not limited to: (a) a pledge of substantially all capital stock held by the Company or any subsidiary guarantor and (b) security interests in substantially all tangible and intangible assets of the Company and each subsidiary guarantor, subject to certain exceptions. The Affinion Credit Facility also contains financial, affirmative and negative covenants. The negative covenants in the Affinion Credit Facility include, among other things, limitations (all of which are subject to certain exceptions) on the Company’s (and in certain cases, Affinion Holdings’) ability to: declare dividends and make other distributions, redeem or repurchase the Company’s capital stock; prepay, redeem or repurchase certain of the Company’s subordinated indebtedness; make loans or investments (including acquisitions); incur additional indebtedness (subject to certain exceptions); enter into agreements that would restrict the ability of the Company’s subsidiaries to pay dividends; merge or enter into acquisitions; sell assets; and enter into transactions with affiliates. The Affinion Credit Facility also requires the Company to comply with financial maintenance covenants with a maximum ratio of senior secured debt (as defined) to EBITDA (as defined) of 4.25:1.00.

In connection with the amendment to the Affinion Credit Facility, the Company incurred financing costs of $5.9 million, which have been included in general and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. In addition, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $6.0 million, which represented the write-off of unamortized debt discount and deferred financing costs.

As of June 30, 2014, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company had borrowings and repayments of $83.0 million and $129.0 million, respectively, under the revolving credit facility. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company had borrowings and repayments of $30.0 million under the revolving credit facility. As of June 30, 2014, the Company had $65.2 million available for borrowing under the Affinion Credit Facility after giving effect to the issuance of $14.8 million of letters of credit.

On December 12, 2013, the Company completed a private offer to exchange the Company’s 2006 senior subordinated notes for 13.50% senior subordinated notes due 2018 (“Investments senior subordinated notes”) issued by Affinion Investments, pursuant to which $360.0 million aggregate principal amount of Investments senior subordinated notes were issued in exchange for $352.9 million aggregate principal amount of 2006 senior subordinated notes. Under the terms of the exchange offer, for each $1,000 principal amount of 2006 senior subordinated notes tendered at or prior to the consent time, holders received $1,020 principal amount of Investments senior subordinated notes. For each $1,000 principal amount of 2006 senior subordinated notes tendered during the offer period but after the consent period, holders received $1,000 principal amount of Investments senior subordinated notes. The Investments senior subordinated notes bear interest at 13.50% per annum, payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing on February 15, 2014. The Investments senior subordinated notes will mature on August 15, 2018. Affinion Investments may redeem some or all of the Investments senior subordinated notes at any time on or after December 12, 2016 at redemption prices (generally at a premium) set forth in the indenture governing the Investments senior subordinated notes. In addition, prior to December 12, 2016, up to 35% of the outstanding Investments senior subordinated notes are redeemable at the option of Affinion Investments, with the net proceeds raised by the Company or Affinion Holdings in one or more equity offerings, at 113.50% of their principal amount. In addition, prior to December 12, 2016, the Investments senior subordinated notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Investments senior subordinated notes redeemed plus a “make-whole” premium. The indenture governing the Investments senior subordinated notes contains negative covenants which restrict the ability of Affinion Investments, any future restricted subsidiaries of Affinion Investments and one of the Company’s other wholly-owned subsidiaries that guarantees the Investments senior subordinated notes to engage in certain transactions and also contains customary events of default. Affinion Investments’ obligations under the Investments senior subordinated notes are guaranteed on an unsecured senior subordinated basis by Affinion Investments II. Each of Affinion Investments and Affinion Investments II is an unrestricted subsidiary of the Company and guarantees the Company’s indebtedness under its senior secured credit facility but does not guarantee the Company’s other indebtedness. The Investments senior subordinated notes and guarantee thereof are unsecured senior subordinated obligations of Affinion Investments, as issuer, and  Affinion Investments II, as guarantor, and rank junior in right of payment to their respective guarantees of the Company’s senior secured credit facility.  

On December 12, 2013, Affinion Investments exchanged with the Company all of the 2006 senior subordinated notes received by it in the exchange offer for Affinion’s 13.50% senior subordinated notes due 2018 (Affinion’s “2013 senior subordinated notes”).

10

---

Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes bear interest at 13.50% per annum payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing on February 15, 2014. The 2013 senior subordinated notes will mature on August 15, 2018. The 2013 senior subordinated notes are redeemable at the Company’s option prior to maturity. The indenture governing the 2013 senior subordinated notes contains negative covenants which restrict the ability of Affinion and its restricted subsidiaries to engage in certain transactions and also contains customary events of default. Affinion’s obligations under the 2013 senior subordinated notes are jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured senior subordinated basis by each of Affinion’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee Affinion’s indebtedness under its senior secured credit facility (other than Affinion Investments and Affinion Investments II). The 2013 senior subordinated notes and guarantees thereof are unsecured senior subordinated obligations of Affinion’s and rank junior to all of Affinion’s and the guarantors’ existing and future senior indebtedness, pari passu with Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes and senior to Affinion’s and the guarantors’ future subordinated indebtedness. Although Affinion Investments is the only holder of  Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes, the trustee for the Investments senior subordinated notes, and holders of at least 25% of the principal amount of the  Investments senior subordinated notes will have the right as third party beneficiaries to enforce the remedies available to Affinion Investments against Affinion, and Affinion Investments will not be able to amend the covenants in the note agreement governing the Investments senior subordinated notes in favor of Affinion unless it has received consent from the holders of a majority of the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding Investments senior subordinated notes.

In connection with the exchange offer and consent solicitation relating to the 2006 senior subordinated notes and the issuance of the Company’s 2013 senior subordinated notes, the Company incurred $5.9 million of financing costs, which have been included in general and administrative expenses during the fourth quarter of 2013.

On November 19, 2010, the Company completed a private offering of $475.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.875% senior notes due 2018 (“2010 senior notes”). The 2010 senior notes bear interest at 7.875% per annum payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing on June 15, 2011. The 2010 senior notes will mature on December 15, 2018. The 2010 senior notes are redeemable at the Company’s option prior to maturity. The indenture governing the 2010 senior notes contains negative covenants which restrict the ability of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries to engage in certain transactions and also contains customary events of default. The Company’s obligations under the 2010 senior notes are jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of the Company’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee the Company’s indebtedness under the Affinion Credit Facility (other than Affinion Investments and Affinion Investments II). The 2010 senior notes and guarantees thereof are senior unsecured obligations of the Company and rank equally with all of the Company’s and the guarantors’ existing and future senior indebtedness and senior to the Company’s and the guarantors existing and future subordinated indebtedness. The 2010 senior notes are therefore effectively subordinated to the Company’s and the guarantors’ existing and future secured indebtedness, including the Company’s obligations under the Affinion Credit Facility, to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness. The 2010 senior notes are structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other obligations of each of the Company’s existing and future subsidiaries that are not guarantors, including the Investments senior subordinated notes. On August 24, 2011, pursuant to the registration rights agreement entered into in connection with the issuance of the 2010 senior notes, the Company completed a registered exchange offer and exchanged all of the then-outstanding 2010 senior notes for a like principal amount of 2010 senior notes that have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).

On April 26, 2006, the Company issued $355.5 million aggregate principal amount of 2006 senior subordinated notes and applied the gross proceeds of $350.5 million to repay $349.5 million of outstanding borrowings under a then-outstanding $383.6 million senior subordinated loan facility (the “Bridge Loan”), plus accrued interest, and used cash on hand to pay fees and expenses associated with such issuance. The 2006 senior subordinated notes bear interest at 11 ¹/₂% per annum, payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15 of each year. The 2006 senior subordinated notes mature on October 15, 2015. The Company may redeem some or all of the 2006 senior subordinated notes at any time on or after October 15, 2010 at redemption prices (generally at a premium) set forth in the indenture governing the 2006 senior subordinated notes. The 2006 senior subordinated notes are unsecured obligations of the Company and rank junior in right of payment with the Company’s existing and future senior obligations and senior to the Company’s future subordinated indebtedness. At June 30, 2014, the 2006 senior subordinated notes were guaranteed by the same subsidiaries of the Company that guarantee the Affinion Credit Facility (other than Affinion Investments and Affinion Investments II) and Affinion’s 2010 senior notes as discussed in Note 12—Guarantor/Non-Guarantor Supplemental Financial Information. On December 12, 2013, $352.9 million aggregate principal amount of 2006 senior subordinated notes were exchanged for $360.0 million of Investments senior subordinated notes.    

On September 13, 2006, the Company completed a registered exchange offer and exchanged all of the then-outstanding 2006 senior subordinated notes into a like principal amount of 2006 senior subordinated notes that have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

The amended Affinion Credit Facility, the 2010 senior notes and the 2013 senior subordinated notes all contain restrictive covenants related primarily to the Company’s ability to distribute dividends, redeem or repurchase capital stock, sell assets, issue additional debt or merge with or acquire other companies. Under the Affinion Credit Facility, the Company generally may pay

11

---

dividends of up to approximately $13.8 million in the aggregate, provided that no default or event of default has occurred or is continuing, or would result from the dividend. Under the Affinion Credit Facility, payment of additional dividends requires the satisfaction of various conditions, including meeting defined leverage ratios and a defined fixed charge coverage ratio, and the total dividend paid cannot exceed a calculated amount of defined available free cash flow, or requires availability under specified baskets. The covenants in the Affinion Credit Facility also require compliance with a senior secured leverage ratio. During the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company did not pay any cash dividends to Affinion Holdings. The Company was in compliance with the covenants referred to above as of June 30, 2014. Payment under each of the debt agreements may be accelerated in the event of a default. Events of default include the failure to pay principal and interest when due, covenant defaults (unless cured within applicable grace periods, if any), events of bankruptcy and, for the amended Affinion Credit Facility, a material breach of representation or warranty and a change of control.

On October 5, 2010, Affinion Holdings issued $325.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2010 senior notes. Affinion Holdings used a portion of the proceeds of $320.3 million (net of issue discount), along with proceeds from a cash dividend from the Company in the amount of $115.3 million, to repay its senior unsecured term loan. A portion of the remaining proceeds from the offering of the 2010 senior notes were utilized to pay related fees and expenses of approximately $6.7 million, with the balance retained for general corporate purposes. The indenture governing Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes contains restrictive covenants related primarily to the Company’s and Affinion Holdings’ ability to distribute dividends, redeem or repurchase capital stock, sell assets, issue additional debt or merge with or acquire other companies. During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company made dividend distributions to Affinion Holdings of $37.0 million and $323.2 million, respectively, to enable Affinion Holdings to service its debt. The Company did not make any dividend distributions to Affinion Holdings during the year ended December 31, 2013 or the six months ended June 30, 2014. The Company expects that, in the future, to the extent that it is permitted contractually and legally to pay cash dividends to Affinion Holdings, Affinion Holdings may require the Company to pay cash dividends to enable Affinion Holdings to service its net cash obligations under the loan facility. The Company and its subsidiaries do not guarantee Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes.

On December 12, 2013, Affinion Holdings completed an offer to exchange Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes for 13.75%/14.50% senior secured PIK/toggle notes due 2018 (Affinion Holdings’ “2013 senior notes”). Under the terms of the exchange offer, for each $1,000 principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes tendered at or prior to the consent time, holders received (i) $1,000 principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes, (ii) Series A warrants to purchase 46.1069 shares of Affinion Holdings’ Class B common stock, and (iii) Series B warrants to purchase 239.8612 shares of Affinion Holdings’ Class B common stock. For each $1,000 principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes tendered during the offer period but after the consent period, holders received (i) $950 principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes, (ii) Series A warrants to purchase 46.1069 shares of Affinion Holdings’ Class B common stock, and (iii) Series B warrants to purchase 239.8612 shares of Affinion Holdings’ Class B common stock. In connection with the exchange offer, $292.8 million aggregate principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes were exchanged for $292.8 million aggregate principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes. The Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes bear interest at 13.75% per annum, payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year, commencing on September 15, 2014. At the Company’s option, it may elect to pay interest (i) in cash, (ii) by increasing the principal amount of the Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes (“PIK Interest”), or (iii) 50% as cash and 50% as PIK Interest. PIK Interest accrues at 13.75% per annum plus 0.75%. The Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes will mature on September 15, 2018. In June 2014, Affinion Holdings completed an offer to exchange Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes for Affinion Holdings’ Series A warrants to purchase shares of Affinion Holdings’ Class B common stock.  In connection with the exchange offer, approximately $88.7 million aggregate principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes were exchanged for up to approximately 30.3 million Series A warrants to purchase shares of Affinion Holdings Class B common stock.

 

 

12

---

6. INCOME TAXES

The Company is included as a member of Affinion Holdings’ consolidated federal income tax return and as a member of certain of Affinion Holdings’ unitary or combined state income tax returns. Income taxes are presented in the Company’s consolidated financial statements using the asset and liability approach based on the separate return method for the consolidated group. Under this method, current and deferred tax expense or benefit for the period is determined for the Company and its subsidiaries as a separate group on a standalone basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated based upon the temporary differences between the financial statements and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using currently enacted tax rates. Deferred tax assets are recorded net of a valuation allowance when, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the recorded deferred tax assets will not be realized in future periods. Decreases to the valuation allowance are recorded as reductions to the income tax provision, while increases to the valuation allowance result in additional income tax provision. The realization of deferred tax assets is primarily dependent on estimated future taxable income. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance for its U.S. federal net deferred tax assets. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company has also recorded valuation allowances against the deferred tax assets related to certain state and foreign tax jurisdictions.

The Company’s effective income tax rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 were (9.1)% and (10.8)%, respectively. The Company’s effective income tax rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 were (32.4)% and (88.5)%, respectively. The difference in the effective tax rates for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 is primarily a result of the increase in loss before income taxes and non-controlling interest of $10.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 to $44.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and an increase in the income tax provision from $3.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 to $4.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014. The difference in the effective tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 is primarily a result of the increase in loss before income taxes and non-controlling interest of $9.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 to $76.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and a decrease in the income tax provision from $8.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 to $8.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The Company’s tax rate is affected by recurring items, such as tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income it earns in those jurisdictions. It is also affected by discrete items that may occur in any given year, but are not consistent from year to year. In addition to state and foreign income taxes and related foreign tax credits, the requirement to maintain valuation allowances had the most significant impact on the difference between the Company’s effective tax rate and the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35%.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. The Company recognized less than $0.1 million and $0.1 million of interest related to uncertain tax positions arising in the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively. The Company recognized less than $0.1 million and $0.1 million of interest related to uncertain tax positions arising in the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. The interest has been included in income tax expense for the current period. The Company’s gross unrecognized tax benefits for the six months ended June 30, 2014 decreased by $5.6 million as a result of tax positions taken during the current period, which was offset by a valuation allowance.

The Company’s income tax returns are periodically examined by various tax authorities. In connection with these and future examinations, certain tax authorities, including the Internal Revenue Service, may raise issues and impose additional assessments. The Company regularly evaluates the likelihood of additional assessments resulting from these examinations and establishes liabilities, through the provision for income taxes, for potential amounts that may result therefrom. The recognition of uncertain tax benefits are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s effective tax rate or results of operations. Federal, state and local jurisdictions are subject to examination by the taxing authorities for all open years as prescribed by applicable statute. For significant foreign jurisdictions, tax years in Germany, France, Turkey, Switzerland and the United Kingdom remain open as prescribed by applicable statute. During 2013 and 2014, income tax waivers were executed in certain states that extend the period subject to examination beyond the period prescribed by statute. There are no significant changes anticipated in accordance with the extension of the income tax statutes in these jurisdictions. The Company does not believe that it is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly within the next 12 months.

 

7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is involved in claims, governmental inquiries and legal proceedings related to employment matters, contract disputes, business practices, trademark and copyright infringement claims and other commercial matters. The Company is also a party to lawsuits which were brought against it and its affiliates and which purport to be a class action in nature and allege that the Company violated certain federal or state consumer protection statutes (as described below). The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against such lawsuits.

13

---

On June 17, 2010, a class action complaint was filed against the Company and Trilegiant Corporation (“Trilegiant”) in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. The complaint asserts various causes of action on behalf of a putative nationwide class and a California-only subclass in connection with the sale by Trilegiant of its membership programs, including claims under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (“ECPA”), the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (“CUTPA”), the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act, the California Unfair Competition Law, the California False Advertising Law, and for unjust enrichment. On September 29, 2010, the Company filed a motion to compel arbitration of all of the claims asserted in this lawsuit. On February 24, 2011, the court denied the Company’s motion. On March 28, 2011, the Company and Trilegiant filed a notice of appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, appealing the district court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration. On September 7, 2012, the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the District Court denying arbitration. While that issue was on appeal, the matter proceeded in the district court. There was written discovery and depositions. Previously, the court had set a briefing schedule on class certification that called for the completion of class certification briefing on May 18, 2012. However, on March 28, 2012, the court suspended the briefing schedule on the motion due to the filing of two other overlapping class actions in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. The first of those cases was filed on March 6, 2012, against the Company, Trilegiant, Chase Bank USA, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Capital One Financial Corp., Citigroup, Inc., Citibank, N.A., Apollo Global Management, LLC, 1-800-Flowers.Com, Inc., United Online, Inc., Memory Lane, Inc., Classmates Int’l, Inc., FTD Group, Inc., Days Inn Worldwide, Inc., Wyndham Worldwide Corp., People Finderspro, Inc., Beckett Media LLC, Buy.com, Inc., Rakuten USA, Inc., IAC/InteractiveCorp., and Shoebuy.com, Inc. The second of those cases was filed on March 25, 2012, against the same defendants as well as Adaptive Marketing, LLC, Vertrue, Inc., Webloyalty.com, Inc., and Wells Fargo & Co. These two cases assert similar claims as the claims asserted in the earlier-filed lawsuit in connection with the sale by Trilegiant of its membership programs. On April 26, 2012, the court consolidated these three cases. The court also set an initial status conference for May 17, 2012. At that status conference, the court ordered that Plaintiffs file a consolidated amended complaint to combine the claims in the three previously separate lawsuits. The court also struck the class certification briefing schedule that had been set previously. On September 7, 2012, the Plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint asserting substantially the same legal claims. The consolidated amended complaint added Priceline, Orbitz, Chase Paymentech, Hotwire, and TigerDirect as Defendants and added three new Plaintiffs; it also dropped Webloyalty and Rakuten as Defendants. On December 7, 2012, all Defendants filed motions seeking to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint and to strike certain portions of the complaint. Plaintiff’s response brief was filed on February 7, 2013, and Defendants’ reply briefs were filed on April 5, 2013. On September 25, 2013, the court held oral argument on the motions to dismiss. On March 28, 2014, the court ruled on the motions to dismiss, granting them in part and denying them in part. The court dismissed the Plaintiffs’ RICO claims and claims under the California Automatic Renewal Statute as to all defendants. The court also dismissed certain named Plaintiffs as their claims were barred either by the statute of limitations and/or a prior settlement agreement. Certain Defendants were also dismissed from the case. The court also struck certain allegations from the consolidated amended complaint, including certain of Plaintiffs’ class action allegations under CUTPA. As to the Company and Trilegiant, the court denied the motion to dismiss certain Plaintiffs’ claims under ECPA and for unjust enrichment, as well as certain other claims of Plaintiffs under CUPTA.

Also, on December 5, 2012, the Plaintiffs’ law firms in these consolidated cases filed an additional action in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. That case is identical in all respects to this case except that it was filed by a new Plaintiff (the named Plaintiff from the class action complaint previously filed against the Company, Trilegiant, 1-800-Flowers.com, and Chase Bank USA, N.A., in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York on November 10, 2010). On January 23, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion to consolidate that case into the existing set of consolidated cases.  On June 13, 2013, the Court entered an order staying the date for all Defendants to respond to the Complaint until 21 days after the court ruled on the motion to consolidate. On March 28, 2014, the court entered an order granting the motion to consolidate.

On May 12, 2014, remaining Defendants in the consolidated cases filed answers in which they denied the material allegations of the consolidated amended complaint and a related identical complaint.  On April 28, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a motion seeking interlocutory appellate review of portions of the court’s order of March 28, 2014.  Briefing on the motion was completed on June 5, 2014.  The Company does not know when the court will rule on that motion.

On June 25, 2010, a class action lawsuit was filed against Webloyalty and one of its clients in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California alleging, among other things, violations of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Electronic Communications Privacy Act, unjust enrichment, fraud, civil theft, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, California Consumers Legal Remedies Act violations, false advertising and California Consumer Business Practice violations. This lawsuit relates to Webloyalty’s alleged conduct occurring on and after October 1, 2008. On February 17, 2011, Webloyalty filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint in this lawsuit. On April 12, 2011, the Court granted Webloyalty’s motion and dismissed all claims against the defendants. On May 10, 2011, plaintiff filed a notice appealing the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Plaintiff filed its opening appeals brief with the Ninth Circuit on October 17, 2011, and defendants filed their respective answering briefs on December 23, 2011. Plaintiff filed its reply brief on January 23, 2012. On January 11, 2013, the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument on the plaintiff’s appeal and, thereafter, took the matter under advisement. On April 25, 2013, the Ninth Circuit decided Plaintiffs’ appeal dismissing the case without prejudice. Thereafter, on May 9, 2013, Plaintiff petitioned for rehearing of the Ninth Circuit’s decision, which petition the Court rejected on May 20, 2013. The District Court followed the mandate of the Ninth Circuit and finally dismissed the action on June 24, 2013. On August 19, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme

14

---

Court. Webloyalty filed an opposition on October 21, 2013. On December 2, 2013, the United States Supreme Court denied Plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari.

On August 27, 2010, another substantially similar class action lawsuit was filed against Webloyalty, one of its former clients and one of the credit card associations in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut alleging, among other things, violations of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, Electronic Communications Privacy Act, unjust enrichment, civil theft, negligent misrepresentation, fraud and Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act violations. This lawsuit relates to Webloyalty’s alleged conduct occurring on and after October 1, 2008. On November 1, 2010, the defendants moved to dismiss the initial complaint, which plaintiff then amended on November 19, 2010. On December 23, 2010, Webloyalty filed a second motion to dismiss this lawsuit. On May 15, 2014, the Court heard oral argument on plaintiff’s motion to strike the Company’s request for judicial notice of the plaintiff’s membership enrollment documents filed in support of the Company’s second motion to dismiss. On July 17, 2014, the Court denied plaintiff’s motion to strike.  The Court, at the same time, dismissed those claims grounded in fraud, but reserved until further proceedings the determination as to whether all of plaintiff’s claims are grounded in fraud and whether those claims not grounded in fraud are dismissible.  The Court has permitted the plaintiff until August 15, 2014 to amend his complaint and has allowed the parties the opportunity to conduct limited discovery, to be completed by September 26, 2014 concerning the issues addressed in its dismissal order. A further motion to dismiss briefing schedule will be set following the conclusion of this limited discovery.

On June 7, 2012, another class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California against Webloyalty that was factually similar to the foregoing California and Connecticut actions. The action claims that Webloyalty engaged in unlawful business practices in violation of California Business and Professional Code § 17200, et seq. and in violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act. Both claims are based on allegations that in connection with enrollment and billing of the plaintiff, Webloyalty charged plaintiff’s credit or debit card using information obtained through a data pass process and without obtaining directly from plaintiff his full account number, name, address, and contact information, as purportedly required under Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act. On September 25, 2012, Webloyalty filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety, scheduling a hearing on the motion for January 14, 2013. Webloyalty also sought judicial notice of the enrollment page and related enrollment and account documents. Plaintiff filed his opposition on December 12, 2012, and Webloyalty filed its reply submission on January 7, 2013. Thereafter, on January 10, 2013, the Court cancelled the previously scheduled January 14, 2013 hearing and indicated that it would rule based on the parties’ written submissions without the need for a hearing, although it has not yet done so. On August 28, 2013, the Court sua sponte dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint without prejudice with leave to amend by September 30, 2013. The Plaintiff filed his amended complaint on September 30, 2013, adding purported claims under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and for unjust enrichment, money had and received, conversion, civil theft, and invasion of privacy. On December 2, 2013, the Company moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s amended complaint. Plaintiff responded to the motion on January 27, 2014. On February 6, 2014, the Court indicated that it would review the submissions and issue a decision on plaintiff’s motion without oral argument.

On February 7, 2014 a class action lawsuit was filed against the Company and one of its clients in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts alleging, among other things, violations of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Electronic Communications Privacy Act, unjust enrichment, money had and received, conversion, misrepresentation, violation of the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act and equitable relief.  Claims are based on allegations that plaintiff was enrolled and billed for a package program without plaintiff’s proper consent and knowledge.  On April 4, 2014, the Company filed a motion to dismiss. A hearing on that motion was held on July 24, 2014.  The Company does not know when the court will rule on that motion.

On May 12, 2014, a class action lawsuit was filed against the Company and one of its clients in the United States District Court, Northern District of California – San Francisco Division. The complaint alleges plaintiff was unknowingly enrolled in and charged for an Identity Theft Protection program.  By agreement of the parties, the defendants have until August 8, 2014 to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint.  An initial case management conference with the court is scheduled for August 12, 2014.  

Other Contingencies

From time to time, the Company receives inquiries from federal and state agencies which may include the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, state attorneys general and other state regulatory agencies, including state insurance regulators. The Company responds to these matters and requests for documents, some of which may lead to further investigations and proceedings.

Between December 2008 and February 2011, the Company and its subsidiaries, Trilegiant Corporation and Webloyalty.com, Inc. received inquiries from numerous state attorneys general relating to the legacy marketing practices in their membership business known as “online data pass” and “live-check marketing” and their compliance with consumer protection statutes. On October 10, 2013, the Company reached a settlement with the following 47 states and the District of Columbia: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. Under the settlement, the Company admitted

15

---

no wrong-doing with respect to such legacy marketing practices and agreed to refrain from engaging in such marketing practices, which the Company voluntarily eliminated in early 2010. In addition, it agreed to fund a $19.4 million restitution program covering eligible consumers in all 48 states participating in the settlement and reimburse the participating states for their investigatory costs in an amount of $13.5 million. The settlement, which was paid in October 2013, does not include any fine or penalty payments.

From time to time, our international operations also receive inquiries from consumer protection, insurance or data protection agencies. The Company responds to these matters and requests for documents, some of which may lead to further investigations and proceedings. The Company continues voluntary discussions with the Financial Conduct Authority in the United Kingdom (the “FCA”) and certain marketing partners to resolve a matter related to the historic sales practices of Affinion International Limited, one of our UK subsidiaries, pertaining to a benefit in one of its products. Resolution of this inquiry is likely to include restitution to relevant consumers where appropriate.

On April 18, 2014, Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank of America”) and FIA Card Services, N.A. (“FIA Card Services”) notified us that they have commenced an arbitration proceeding against Trilegiant and Affinion pursuant to the terms of the parties’ servicing agreements. In the arbitration proceeding, Bank of America asserted various causes of action and requests for monetary and other relief, including a demand for contractual indemnification of the losses and costs, including in particular customer refunds and reasonable attorneys’ fees that Bank of America incurred related to consent orders entered into by Bank of America with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency on April 7, 2014 and with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau on April 9, 2014. On May 16, 2014, Trilegiant commenced two separate arbitration proceedings against Bank of America, asserting that Bank of America breached the parties’ servicing agreements.  Bank of America has denied these claims.  On July 7, 2014, the parties agreed to stay one of the arbitrations initiated by Trilegiant and to dismiss the other arbitrations without prejudice, pending a mediation scheduled for the fall of 2014.  If the mediation is unsuccessful, an arbitration will be held that would include all unresolved claims asserted by each party in each of the three original arbitration proceedings.  

The Company believes that the amount accrued for the above litigation and contingencies matters is adequate, and the reasonably possible loss beyond the amounts accrued will not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, based on information currently available. However, litigation is inherently unpredictable and, although the Company believes that accruals are adequate and it intends to vigorously defend itself against such matters, unfavorable resolution could occur, which could have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole.

Surety Bonds and Letters of Credit

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is required to provide surety bonds to various state authorities in order to operate its membership, insurance and travel agency programs. As of June 30, 2014, the Company provided guarantees for surety bonds totaling approximately $10.6 million and issued letters of credit totaling $17.4 million.

 

 

8. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

In connection with the closing of the Apollo Transactions on October 17, 2005, Affinion Holdings adopted the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”). The 2005 Plan authorizes the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Affinion Holdings to grant non-qualified, non-assignable stock options and rights to purchase shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock to directors and employees of, and consultants to, Affinion Holdings and its subsidiaries. Options granted under the 2005 Plan have an exercise price no less than the fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Stock awards have a purchase price determined by the Board. The Board was authorized to grant up to 4.9 million shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock under the 2005 Plan over a ten year period. As discussed below, no additional grants may be made under Affinion Holdings’ 2005 Plan on or after November 7, 2007, the effective date of the 2007 Plan, as defined below.

In November 2007, Affinion Holdings adopted the 2007 Stock Award Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan authorizes the Board to grant awards of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, stock bonus awards, performance compensation awards (including cash bonus awards) or any combination of these awards to directors and employees of, and consultants to, Affinion Holdings and its subsidiaries. Unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors, options granted under the 2007 Plan will have an exercise price no less than the fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Stock awards have a purchase price determined by the Board. The Board was authorized to grant up to 10.0 million shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock under the 2007 Plan over a ten year period. As of June 30, 2014, there were 0.1 million shares available under the 2007 Plan for future grants.

In connection with the acquisition of Webloyalty in January 2011, the Company assumed the Webloyalty Holdings, Inc. 2005 Equity Award Plan (the “Webloyalty 2005 Plan”). The Webloyalty 2005 Plan, adopted by Webloyalty’s board of directors in May 2005, authorized Webloyalty’s board of directors to grant awards of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock bonuses and performance compensation awards or any combination of these awards to directors and employees of, and consultants to, Webloyalty. Unless otherwise determined by Webloyalty’s board of

16

---

directors, incentive stock options granted under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan were to have an exercise price no less than the fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant and nonqualified stock options granted under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan were to have an exercise price no less than the par value of a share of Webloyalty’s common stock on the date of grant. The Webloyalty board of directors was authorized to grant shares of Webloyalty’s common stock under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan over a ten year period. As of June 30, 2014, after conversion of the outstanding options under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan into options to acquire shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock, there were options to acquire 0.6 million shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock. On March 28, 2014, the Company modified approximately 0.5 million of the outstanding options under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan, adjusting the exercise price to $1.14 per common share and extending the contractual life of the modified options until April 1, 2024. At June 30, 2014, the outstanding options had exercise prices ranging from $1.14 to $7.32. All of the outstanding options were vested as of June 30, 2014 and expire between March 2016 and April 2024.

For employee stock awards, the Company recognizes compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service period, which is the period during which the employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award. The Company has elected to recognize compensation cost for awards with only a service condition and have a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

Stock Options

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, there were no stock options granted to employees from the 2005 Plan. All options previously granted were granted with an exercise price equal to the estimated fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

Stock options granted to employees from the 2005 Plan are comprised of three tranches with the following terms:

 

 

 

On March 28, 2014, the Company modified approximately 1.9 million of the outstanding options under the 2005 Plan, adjusting the exercise price to $1.14 per common share and extending the contractual life of the modified options until April 1, 2024.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, 1.4 million stock options were granted to employees from the 2007 Plan. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, 0.4 million stock options were granted to employees from the 2007 Plan. All options granted were granted with an exercise price equal to the estimated fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

The stock options granted to employees from the 2007 Plan have the following terms:

 

 

On March 28, 2014, the Company modified approximately 2.4 million of the outstanding options under the 2007 Plan, adjusting the exercise price to $1.14 per common share and extending the contractual life of the modified options until April 1, 2024.

 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, 0.1 million stock options were granted to members of the Board of Directors. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, there were no stock options granted to members of the Board of Directors. Generally, options granted to members of the Board of Directors fully vest on the date of grant and have an initial option term of 10 years. On March 28, 2014, the Company modified approximately 0.2 million of the outstanding options granted to members of the Board of Directors, adjusting the exercise price to $1.14 per common share and extending the contractual life of the modified options until April 1, 2024.

17

---

The fair value of each option award from the 2007 Plan was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of comparable companies.

The expected term of the options granted represents the period of time that options are expected to be outstanding, and is based on the average of the requisite service period and the contractual term of the option.

 

 

A summary of option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2014 is presented below (number of options in thousands):

 

Based on the estimated fair values of options granted, stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 totaled $0.6 million and $4.6 million, respectively. The stock-based compensation expense recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2014 included $3.4 million of stock-based compensation expense recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2014 related to the modification of certain stock options held by approximately 200 employees. Based on the estimated fair values of options granted, stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 totaled $0.8 million and $1.9 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2014, there was $3.7 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.0 years.

Restricted Stock Units

On March 30, 2012, the Board’s Compensation Committee approved the 2012 Retention Award Program (the “2012 RAP”), which provides for awards of RSUs under the 2007 Stock Award Plan. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company granted approximately 1.4 million RSUs to key employees. The RSUs awarded under the 2012 RAP have an aggregate cash election dollar value of approximately $11.3 million and are subject to time-based vesting conditions that run through December 31, 2014. Generally, the number of RSUs awarded to each participant is equal to the quotient of (i) the Dollar Award Value, divided by (ii) $8.16, the value per share of Affinion Holdings’ common stock as of the grant date. Upon vesting of the RSUs, participants are able to settle the RSUs in shares of common stock or elect to receive cash in lieu of shares of common stock upon any of the three vesting dates for such RSUs. Due to the ability of the participants to settle their awards in cash, the Company accounts for these RSUs as a liability award.

18

---

A summary of restricted stock unit activity for the six months ended June 30, 2014 is presented below (number of restricted stock units in thousands):

 

Based on the estimated fair value of the restricted stock units granted, stock-based compensation expense for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 was $1.0 million. Based on the estimated fair value of the restricted stock units granted, stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was $1.9 million and $3.3 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2014, there was $0.2 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to the remaining vesting period of restricted stock units granted under the 2007 Plan. This cost will be recorded in future periods as stock-based compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 0.2 years.

Performance Incentive Awards

On April 1, 2014, the Compensation Committee of the Board approved the terms of the Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. 2014 Performance Incentive Award Program (the “Performance Program”), an equity and cash incentive award program intended to foster retention of key employees of the Company. The awards to key employees consist of performance incentive units (“PIUs”) and a cash incentive award (“CIA”) and the aggregate cash value of awarded PIUs and CIA comprise the Award Value. The number of PIUs awarded to a participant, which will be awarded from the 2007 Plan, will be equal to the quotient of (i) 50% of the Award Value divided by (ii) the fair market value per share of common stock as of the grant date, which was determined to be $1.14. The amount of the CIA granted to a participant is equal to 50% of the Award Value. Each of the two components of an award is subject to adjustment based on the achievement of performance goals. The awards are subject to certain performance and time-based vesting factors. The maximum number of PIUs and the maximum amount of the CIA into which a participant will be eligible to vest will be determined based on the achievement of certain overall corporate and business unit performance goals, as applicable, during the 2014 calendar year. A participant’s maximum amount of PIUs and the maximum amount of a participant’s CIA will vest in three substantially equal installments on March 15, 2015, 2016 and 2017, subject to that participant’s continued service with the Company on each applicable vesting date. Each PIU that vests on a vesting date will be settled for a share of common stock and for the portion of the CIA that vests on a vesting date the Company will pay the participant an amount equal to the vested portion of the CIA. The aggregate award value granted to participants under the Performance Program was approximately $9.6 million, subject to adjustment as described above. As of June 30, 2014, the outstanding aggregate award value granted to participants under the Performance Program was approximately $9.4 million, net of forfeitures of approximately $0.2 million. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, stock-based compensation expense of $0.4 million was recognized. As of June 30, 2014, there was $9.0 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to the Performance Program, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.3 years.

 

9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Post-Closing Relationships with Cendant

Cendant has agreed to indemnify the Company, Affinion Holdings and the Company’s affiliates (collectively the “indemnified parties”) for breaches of representations, warranties and covenants made by Cendant, as well as for other specified matters, certain of which are described below. Affinion Holdings and the Company have agreed to indemnify Cendant for breaches of representations, warranties and covenants made in the purchase agreement, as well as for certain other specified matters. Generally, all parties’ indemnification obligations with respect to breaches of representations and warranties (except with respect to the matters described below) (i) are subject to a $0.1 million occurrence threshold, (ii) are not effective until the aggregate amount of losses suffered by the indemnified party exceeds $15.0 million (and then only for the amount of losses exceeding $15.0 million) and (iii) are limited to $275.1 million of recovery. Generally, subject to certain exceptions of greater duration, the parties’ indemnification obligations with respect to representations and warranties survived until April 15, 2007 with indemnification obligations related to covenants surviving until the applicable covenant has been fully performed.

In connection with the purchase agreement, Cendant agreed to specific indemnification obligations with respect to the matters described below.

19

---

Excluded Litigation. Cendant has agreed to fully indemnify the indemnified parties with respect to any pending or future litigation, arbitration, or other proceeding relating to accounting irregularities in the former CUC International, Inc. announced on April 15, 1998.

Certain Litigation and Compliance with Law Matters. Cendant has agreed to indemnify the indemnified parties up to specified amounts for: (a) breaches of its representations and warranties with respect to legal proceedings that (1) occur after the date of the purchase agreement, (2) relate to facts and circumstances related to the business of AGLLC or Affinion International Holdings Limited (“Affinion International”) and (3) constitute a breach or violation of its compliance with law representations and warranties and (b) breaches of its representations and warranties with respect to compliance with laws to the extent related to the business of AGLLC or Affinion International.

Cendant, Affinion Holdings and the Company have agreed that losses up to $15.0 million incurred with respect to these matters will be borne solely by the Company and losses in excess of $15.0 million will be shared by the parties in accordance with agreed upon allocations. The Company has the right at all times to control litigation related to shared losses and Cendant has consultation rights with respect to such litigation.

Prior to 2009, Cendant (i) distributed the equity interests it previously held in its hospitality services business (“Wyndham”) and its real estate services business (“Realogy”) to Cendant stockholders and (ii) sold its travel services business (“Travelport”) to a third party. Cendant continues as a re-named publicly traded company which owns the vehicle rental business (“Avis Budget,” together with Wyndham and Realogy, the “Cendant Entities”). Subject to certain exceptions, Wyndham and Realogy have agreed to share Cendant’s contingent and other liabilities (including its indemnity obligations to the Company described above and other liabilities to the Company in connection with the Apollo Transactions) in specified percentages. If any Cendant Entity defaults in its payment, when due, of any such liabilities, the remaining Cendant Entities are required to pay an equal portion of the amounts in default. Wyndham held a portion of the preferred stock issued in connection with the Apollo Transactions until the preferred stock was redeemed in 2011, and a portion of the warrants issued in connection with the Apollo Transactions until the warrants expired in 2011, while Realogy was subsequently acquired by an affiliate of Apollo. Therefore, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, only Realogy remains a related party.

Other Agreements

On October 17, 2005, Apollo entered into a consulting agreement with the Company for the provision of certain structuring and advisory services. The consulting agreement allows Apollo and its affiliates to provide certain advisory services for a period of twelve years or until Apollo owns less than 5% of the beneficial economic interests of the Company, whichever is earlier. The agreement could be terminated earlier by mutual consent. The Company was required to pay Apollo an annual fee of $2.0 million for these services commencing in 2006. On January 14, 2011, the Company and Apollo entered into an Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement (“Consulting Agreement”), pursuant to which Apollo and its affiliates will continue to provide Affinion with certain advisory services on substantially the same terms as the previous consulting agreement, except that the annual fee paid by Affinion increased to $2.6 million from $2.0 million, commencing January 1, 2012, with an additional one-time fee of $0.6 million which was paid in January 2011 in respect of calendar year 2011. In connection with the December 2013 refinancing of Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes and Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes, Apollo and the Company further amended the consulting agreement, pursuant to which Apollo will not be paid any fees due under the consulting agreement until such time as none of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes remain outstanding. The amounts expensed related to this consulting agreement were $0.6 million for each of the three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 and $1.3 million for each of the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, which are included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income. If a transaction is consummated involving a change of control or an initial public offering, then, in lieu of the annual consulting fee and subject to certain qualifications, Apollo may elect to receive a lump sum payment equal to the present value of all consulting fees payable through the end of the term of the consulting agreement.

In addition, the Company will be required to pay Apollo a transaction fee if it engages in any merger, acquisition or similar transaction. The Company will also indemnify Apollo and its affiliates and their directors, officers and representatives for potential losses relating to the services to be provided under the consulting agreement.

In July 2006, affiliates of Apollo acquired one of the Company’s vendors, SOURCEHOV, LLC (formerly SOURCECORP Incorporated), that provides document and information services to the Company. The fees incurred for these services were $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, which is included in cost of revenues in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income. As a result of the sale in 2013 of SOURCEHOV, LLC by the affiliates of Apollo, SOURCEHOV, LLC was not a related party during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

On January 28, 2010, the Company acquired an ownership interest of approximately 5%, subsequently reduced to approximately 2.9%, in Alclear Holdings, LLC (“Alclear”) for $1.0 million. A family member of one of the Company’s directors

20

---

controls and partially funded Alclear and serves as its chief executive officer. The Company provides support services to Alclear and recognized revenue of $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 and $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

On May 8, 2013, in connection with his resignation as Chief Executive Officer of Global Retail Services and Co-President of Affinion, Mr. Richard J. Fernandes entered into a consulting agreement with Trilegiant Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, effective May 13, 2013, pursuant to which he would continue working with the Company until the one-year anniversary of such resignation. The contract was subsequently amended to extend the term on a month-to-month basis and the contract may be terminated by either party upon thirty days written notice.  Mr. Fernandes provides certain consulting services to the Company on a part-time basis and receives a fee of $7,500 per month, subject to increase depending on the level of consulting services provided. The agreement also provides for reimbursement of Mr. Fernandes’ out-of-pocket business and travel expenses and for his healthcare insurance costs during the contract period.

 

10. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, DERIVATIVES AND FAIR VALUE MEASURES

As a matter of policy, the Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.

The following table provides information about the Company’s financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. The table presents principal cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity for the Company’s long-term debt as of June 30, 2014:

 

 

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts

On a limited basis the Company has entered into 30 day foreign currency forward contracts, and upon expiration of the contracts, entered into successive 30 day foreign currency forward contracts. The contracts have been entered into to mitigate the Company’s foreign currency exposures related to intercompany loans which are not expected to be repaid within the next twelve months and that are denominated in Euros and British pounds. At June 30, 2014, the Company had in place contracts to sell EUR 26.6 million and receive $36.2 million and to sell GBP 13.9 million and receive $23.7 million.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company recognized a realized loss on the forward contracts of $0.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively, and during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recognized a realized loss on the forward contracts of $1.1 million and a realized gain on the forward contracts of $1.5 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2014, the Company had a de minimis unrealized loss on the foreign currency forward contracts.

Credit Risk and Exposure

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of receivables, profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers, prepaid commissions and interest rate swaps. The Company manages such risk by evaluating the financial position and creditworthiness of such counterparties. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, approximately $18.2 million and $36.2 million, respectively, of the profit-sharing receivable was due from one insurance carrier. Receivables and profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers are from various marketing, insurance and business partners and the Company maintains an allowance for losses, based upon expected collectability. Commission advances are periodically evaluated as to recovery.

21

---

Fair Value

The Company determines the fair value of financial instruments as follows:

Current accounting guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs) and (2) the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels, giving the highest priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. Level 1 inputs to a fair value measurement are quoted market prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted market prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

There were no financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, other than foreign currency forward contracts. Such contracts have historically had a term of approximately thirty days and have been held to maturity. The fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts is measured based on significant observable inputs (Level 2).

The following table summarizes assets measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs on a nonrecurring basis subsequent to initial recognition:

 

 

 

 

11. SEGMENT INFORMATION

Management evaluates the operating results of each of its reportable segments based upon several factors, of which the primary factors are revenue and “Segment EBITDA,” which the Company defines as income from operations before depreciation and amortization. The presentation of Segment EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

The Segment EBITDA of the Company’s four reportable segments does not include general corporate expenses. General corporate expenses include costs and expenses that are of a general corporate nature or managed on a corporate basis, including primarily stock-based compensation expense and consulting fees paid to Apollo. General corporate expenses have been excluded from the presentation of the Segment EBITDA for the Company’s four reportable segments because they are not reported to the chief operating decision maker for purposes of allocating resources among operating segments or assessing operating segment performance.

22

---

The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Net Revenues

 

Segment EBITDA

 

 

 

 

 

 

23

---

12. GUARANTOR/NON-GUARANTOR SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following supplemental condensed consolidating financial information presents, in separate columns, the condensed consolidating balance sheets as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and the related condensed consolidating statements of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 and the related condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 for (i) the Company (Affinion Group, Inc.) on a parent-only basis, with its investment in subsidiaries recorded under the equity method, (ii) the Guarantor Subsidiaries (the Company’s subsidiaries that guarantee the 2010 senior notes) on a combined basis, (iii) the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries on a combined basis and (iv) the Company on a consolidated basis. The guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several obligations of each of the guarantor subsidiaries, all of which are 100% owned by the Company. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of the Company to obtain funds from any of its guarantor subsidiaries by dividends or loan.

The supplemental financial information has been presented in lieu of separate financial statements of the guarantors as such separate financial statements are not considered meaningful.

 

24

---

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

AS OF JUNE 30, 2014

(In millions)

 

 

25

---

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013

(In millions)

 

26

---

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

(In millions)

 

 

 

27

---

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

(In millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

28

---

 

 

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

(In millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

29

---

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

(In millions)

 

 

 

30

---

 

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

(In millions)

 

 

31

---

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

(In millions)

 

 

 

 

 

32

---

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Form 10-Q”) is prepared by Affinion Group, Inc. Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, in this Form 10-Q all references to “Affinion,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Affinion Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis; and all references to “Affinion Holdings” refer to Affinion Group Holdings, Inc., the parent company of Affinion Group, Inc.

The following discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Form 10-K”) and with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto presented in this Form 10-Q.

Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Our disclosure and analysis in this Form 10-Q may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations and projections relating to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of the timing or nature of future operating or financial performance or other events. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this Form 10-Q that address activities, events or developments that we expect, believe or anticipate will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements are largely based on our expectations and beliefs concerning future events, which reflect estimates and assumptions made by our management. These estimates and assumptions reflect our best judgment based on currently known market conditions and other factors relating to our operations and business environment, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control.

Although we believe our estimates and assumptions to be reasonable, they are inherently uncertain and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that are beyond our control. In addition, management’s assumptions about future events may prove to be inaccurate. Management cautions all readers that the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q are not guarantees of future performance, and we cannot assure any reader that those statements will be realized or the forward-looking events and circumstances will occur. Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements due to the factors listed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Form 10-K and this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section, or MD&A. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. We do not intend to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. These cautionary statements qualify all forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf.

Introduction

The MD&A is provided as a supplement to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere herein to help provide an understanding of our financial condition, results of our operations and changes in our financial condition. The MD&A is organized as follows:

33

---

Overview

Description of Business

We are a global leader in the designing, marketing and servicing of comprehensive customer engagement and loyalty solutions that enhance and extend the relationship of millions of consumers with many of the largest and most respected companies in the world. We generally partner with these leading companies in two ways: 1) by developing and supporting programs that are natural extensions of our partner companies’ brand image and that provide valuable services to their end-customers, and 2) by providing the back-end technological support and redemption services for points-based loyalty programs. Using our expertise in customer engagement, product development, creative design and data-driven targeted marketing, we develop and market programs and services that enable the companies we partner with to generate significant, high-margin incremental revenue, enhance our partners’ brand among targeted consumers as well as strengthen and enhance the loyalty of their customer relationships. The enhanced loyalty can lead to increased acquisition of new customers, longer retention of existing customers, improved customer satisfaction rates, and greater use of other services provided by such companies. We refer to the leading companies that we work with to provide customer engagement and loyalty solutions as our marketing partners or clients. We refer to the consumers to whom we provide services directly under a contractual relationship as subscribers, insureds or members. We refer to those consumers that we service on behalf of a third party, such as one of our marketing partners, and with whom we have a contractual relationship as end-customers.

We utilize our substantial expertise in a variety of direct engagement media to market valuable products and services to the customers of our marketing partners on a highly targeted, campaign basis. The selection of the media employed in a campaign corresponds to the preferences and expectations the targeted customers have demonstrated for transacting with our marketing partners, as we believe this optimizes response, thereby improving the efficiency of our marketing investment. Accordingly, we maintain significant capabilities to market through direct mail, point-of-sale, direct response television, the internet, inbound and outbound telephony and voice response unit marketing, as well as other media as needed.

We design customer engagement and loyalty solutions with an attractive suite of benefits and ease of usage that we believe are likely to interest and engage consumers based on their needs and interests. For example, we provide discount travel services, credit monitoring and identity-theft resolution, AD&D insurance, roadside assistance, various checking account and credit card enhancement services, loyalty program design and management, disaggregated loyalty points redemptions for gift cards, travel and merchandise, as well as other products and services.

We believe our portfolio of the products and services that are embedded in our engagement solutions is the broadest in the industry. Our scale, combined with the industry’s largest proprietary database, proven marketing techniques and strong marketing partner relationships developed over our 40 year operating history, position us to deliver consistent results in a variety of market conditions.

As of December 31, 2013, we had approximately 60 million subscribers and end-customers enrolled in our membership, insurance and package programs worldwide and approximately 150 million customers who received credit or debit card enhancement services or loyalty points-based management services.

We organize our business into two operating units:

34

---

We offer our products and services through both retail and wholesale arrangements with our marketing partners as well as through direct-to-consumer marketing. Currently, we primarily provide wholesale services and benefits derived from our credit card registration, credit monitoring and identity-theft resolution products. In the majority of our retail arrangements, we incur the marketing solicitation expenses to acquire new customers for our subscription-based membership, insurance and package enhancement products with the objective of building a base of highly profitable and predictable recurring future revenue streams and cash flows. For our membership, insurance and package enhancement products, these upfront marketing costs are expensed when the costs are incurred in support of a launched campaign.

Our membership programs are offered under a variety of terms and conditions. Prospective members are usually offered incentives (e.g. free credit reports or other premiums) and one to three month risk-free trial periods to encourage them to evaluate and use the benefits of membership before the first billing period takes effect. We do not recognize any revenue during the trial period and expense the cost of all incentives and program benefits and servicing costs as incurred.

Customers of our membership programs typically pay their subscription fees either annually or monthly. Our membership products may have significant timing differences between the receipt of membership fees for annual members and revenue recognition. Historically, memberships were offered primarily under full money back terms whereby a member could receive a full refund upon cancellation at any time during the current membership term. These revenues were recognized upon completion of the membership term when they were no longer refundable. Depending on the length of the trial period, this revenue may not have been recognized for up to 16 months after the related marketing spend was incurred and expensed. Currently, annual memberships are primarily renewed under pro-rata arrangements in which the member is entitled to a prorated refund for the unused portion of their membership term. This allows us to recognize revenue ratably over the annual membership term. Upon completion of the subscription term, the membership renews under generally the same billing terms in which it originated. Given that we had historically offered a significant amount of subscriptions offering annual terms, our existing base continues to reflect a blend of both monthly and annual terms, and will continue doing so for as long as a substantial percentage of the annual subscribers renew. However, the majority of our recent solicitation activity has been for subscriptions offering monthly terms, and during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013, in excess of 95% of our new member and end-customer enrollments were in monthly payment programs. Revenue is recognized monthly under both annual pro rata and monthly memberships, allowing for a better matching of revenues and related servicing and benefit costs when compared to annual full money back memberships.

When marketing with a marketing partner, we generally utilize the brand names and customer contacts of the marketing partner in our marketing campaigns. We usually compensate our marketing partners either through commissions based on revenues we receive from members (which we expense in proportion to the revenue we recognize) or up-front marketing payments, commonly referred to as “bounties” (which we expense when incurred). In addition, we enter into arrangements with certain marketing partners where we pay the marketing partners advance commissions which provide the potential for recovery from the marketing partners if certain targets are not achieved. These payments are capitalized and amortized over the expected life of the acquired members. The commission rates that we pay to our marketing partners differ depending on the arrangement we have with the particular marketing partner and the type of media we utilize for a given marketing campaign.

In a direct-to-consumer campaign, we invest in a variety of media to generate consumer awareness of our programs and services and stimulate responses from our targeted markets. The media channels we employ in direct-to-consumer include television advertising as well as Internet marketing, such as search engine optimization and related techniques. When marketing directly to the consumer, we generally use our proprietary brands and avoid incurring any commission expense.

We serve as an agent and third-party administrator on behalf of a variety of underwriters for the marketing of AD&D and our other insurance products. Free trial periods and incentives are generally not offered with our insurance programs. Insurance program participants typically pay their insurance premiums either monthly or quarterly. We earn revenue in the form of commissions collected on behalf of the insurance carriers and historically have participated in profit-sharing relationships with the carriers that underwrite the insurance policies that we market, where profit is measured by the excess amount of premium remitted to the carrier less the cost for claim activities and any related expenses. Our estimated share of profits from these arrangements is reflected as profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers on the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and any changes in estimated profit sharing in connection with the actual claims activities are periodically recorded as an adjustment to net revenue.

35

---

Insurance revenues are recognized ratably over the insurance period for which a policy is in effect and there are no significant differences between cash flows and related revenue recognition. Revenue from insurance programs is reported net of insurance costs in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

We are currently in the process of transferring a significant portion of our AD&D business to a new carrier. Upon completion, and for any additional portion of the business that is subsequently transferred to this carrier or another carrier under similar terms, we expect to lessen the volatility in our results by setting a fixed distribution of collected premiums, thereby considerably reducing the profit-sharing feature that has historically contributed to fluctuations in our revenues and profitability. Additionally, the new carrier is expected to provide us with opportunities to expand our existing insurance product offerings.

In our wholesale arrangements, we provide our products and services as well as customer service and fulfillment related to such products and services to support programs that our marketing partners offer to their customers. In such arrangements, our marketing partners are typically responsible for customer acquisition, retention and collection and generally pay us one-time implementation fees and on-going monthly service fees based on the number of members enrolled in their programs. Implementation fees are recognized ratably over the contract period while monthly service fees are recognized in the month earned. Wholesale revenues also include revenues from transactional activities associated with our programs, such as the sales of additional credit reports, discount shopping or travel purchases by members. The revenues from such transactional activities are recognized in the month earned.

We have a highly variable-cost structure because the majority of our expenses are either discretionary in nature or tied directly to the generation of revenue. In addition, we have achieved meaningful operating efficiencies by combining similar functions and processes, consolidating facilities and outsourcing a significant portion of our call center and other back-office processing, particularly with respect to previously acquired businesses. This added flexibility better enables us to deploy our discretionary marketing expenditures globally across our operations to maximize returns.

Factors Affecting Results of Operations and Financial Condition

Competitive Environment

As a leader in the affinity direct marketing industry, we compete with many other organizations, including certain of our marketing partners as well as other benefit providers, to obtain a share of the end-consumer’s spending in each of our respective product categories. As an affinity direct marketer, we derive our leads from a marketing partner’s contacts, which our competitors also seek access to, and we must therefore generate sufficient earnings per lead for our marketing partners to compete effectively for access to their end-customers.

As direct-to-consumer marketers, we compete with any company who offers comparable benefits and services to what we market from our own product portfolio.

We compete with companies of varying size, financial strength and availability of resources. Our competitors include marketing solutions providers, financial institutions, insurance companies, consumer goods companies, internet companies and others, as well as direct marketers offering similar programs. Some of our competitors are larger than we are and are able to deploy more resources in their pursuit of the limited target market for our products.

We expect these competitive environments to continue in the foreseeable future.

Acquisitions

On November 14, 2012, the Company entered into, and consummated, a Share Sale and Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) that resulted in the acquisition of Boyner Bireysel Urunler Satis ve Pazarlama A.S (“Back-Up”), a Turkish provider of assistance and consultancy services to its members, and a sister company, Bofis Turizm ve Ticaret A.S. (“Travel”), a Turkish travel agency. In accordance with the Agreement, on November 14, 2012, the Company acquired 90% of the outstanding capital stock of Back-Up and 99.99% of the outstanding capital stock of Travel for an upfront cash payment of approximately $12.5 million and contingent consideration payable ratably on each of the first three anniversaries of the acquisition date aggregating approximately $8.4 million.

Back-Up and Travel were owned by Turkey’s largest retail group at that time and the Company believes that Back-Up’s and Travel’s assistance and concierge service model fits well with the Company’s global product offerings. The acquisition will enable the Company to expand into Turkey, which the Company deems a key market, given both its size as well as the attractive demographics of its population, and enables the expansion of the Company’s product offerings to a new customer base.

36

---

Financial Industry Trends

Historically, financial institutions have represented a significant majority of our marketing partner base. Consumer banking is a highly regulated industry, with various federal, state and international authorities governing various aspects of the marketing and servicing of the products we offer through our financial institution partners.

For instance, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) mandates the most wide-ranging overhaul of financial industry regulation in decades. Dodd-Frank created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”) which became operational on July 21, 2011, and has been given authority to regulate all consumer financial products sold by banks and non-bank companies. These regulations have imposed additional reporting, supervisory, and regulatory requirements on our financial institution marketing partners which has adversely affected our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, even an inadvertent failure of our financial institution marketing partners to comply with these laws and regulations, as well as rapidly evolving social expectations of corporate fairness, could adversely affect our business or our reputation going forward. Some of our marketing partners have become involved in governmental inquiries that include our products or marketing practices. As a result, certain financial institution marketing partners have, and others could, delay or cease marketing with us, terminate their agreements with us, require us to cease providing services to members or end-consumers, or require changes to our products or services to consumers that could also have a material adverse effect on our business. Partially as a result of these factors, we have experienced a decline in our domestic membership customer base and domestic membership revenues, and we anticipate this trend will continue.

In certain circumstances, our financial marketing partners have sought to source and market their own in-house programs, most notably programs that are analogous to our credit card registration, credit monitoring and identity-theft resolution services. As we have sought to maintain our market share in these areas and to continue these programs with our marketing partners, in some circumstances, we have shifted from a retail marketing arrangement to a wholesale arrangement which results in lower net revenue, but unlike our retail arrangement, has no related commission expense, thereby preserving our ability to earn a suitable rate of return on the campaign. During periods of increased interest from our marketing partners for wholesale activity, partially as a result of this trend, we have experienced a revenue reduction in our membership business.

Internationally, our package products have been primarily offered by some of the largest financial institutions in Europe. As these banks attempt to increase their own net revenues and margins, we have experienced significant price reductions when our agreements come up for renewal from what we had previously been able to charge these institutions for our programs. We expect this pricing pressure on our international package offerings to continue in the future.

Direct-to-Consumer

We are allocating an increasing percentage of our domestic marketing investment to the direct-to-consumer channel. We have tested various direct-to-consumer media and we believe we will be able to achieve returns on our investments that are comparable to our traditional channels.

Regulatory Environment

We are subject to federal and state regulation as well as regulation by foreign authorities in other jurisdictions. Certain laws and regulations that govern our operations include: federal, state and foreign marketing and consumer protection laws and regulations; federal, state and foreign privacy and data protection laws and regulations; federal, state and foreign insurance and insurance mediation laws and regulations; and federal, state and foreign travel laws and regulations. Federal regulations are primarily enforced by the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission and the CFPB. State regulations are primarily enforced by individual state attorneys general and insurance departments. Foreign regulations are enforced by a number of regulatory bodies in the relevant jurisdictions.

These regulations primarily impact the means we use to market our programs, which can reduce the acceptance rates of our solicitation efforts, impact our ability to obtain information from our members and end-customers and impact the benefits we provide and how we service our members and end-customers. In addition, new and contemplated regulations enacted by, or marketing partner settlement agreements or consent orders with, the CFPB could impose additional reporting, supervisory and regulatory requirements on, as well as result in inquiries of, us and our marketing partners that could delay or terminate marketing campaigns with certain marketing partners, impact the services and products we provide to consumers, subject us to indemnification obligations under our marketing agreements, and otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We incur significant costs to ensure compliance with these regulations; however, we are party to lawsuits, including class action lawsuits, and regulatory investigations involving our business practices which also increase our costs of doing business. See Note 7 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in “Item 1. Financial Statements.”

37

---

Seasonality

Historically, seasonality has not had a significant impact on our business. Our revenues are more affected by the timing of marketing programs that can change from year to year depending on the opportunities available and pursued. More recently, in connection with the growth in our loyalty business, we have experienced increasing seasonality in the timing of our cash flows, particularly with respect to working capital. This has been due primarily to the consumer’s increasing acceptance and use of certain categories for points redemptions, such as travel services and gift cards. These categories typically present a delay from the time we incur a cash outlay to provision the redemption until we are reimbursed by the client for the activity, and in certain instances, these delays may extend across multiple reporting periods. Redemptions for some categories, such as gift cards, have been weighted more heavily to the end of the year due to consumers’ increasing usage of points in connection with seasonal gift giving.

Results of Operations

Supplemental Data

We manage our business using a portfolio approach, meaning that we allocate and reallocate our marketing investments in the ongoing pursuit of the highest and best available returns, allocating our resources to whichever products, geographies and programs offer the best opportunities. With the globalization of our clients, the continued evolution of our programs and services and the ongoing refinement and execution of our marketing allocation strategy, we have developed the following table that we believe captures the way we look at the businesses (subscriber and insured amounts in thousands except per average subscriber and insured amounts).

 

Wholesale members include end-customers where we typically receive a monthly service fee to support programs offered by our marketing partners. Certain programs historically offered as retail arrangements have switched to wholesale arrangements with lower annualized price points and no commission expense.

Basic insureds typically receive $1,000 of AD&D coverage at no cost to the consumer since the marketing partner pays the cost of this coverage. Supplemental insureds are customers who have elected to pay premiums for higher levels of coverage.

Segment EBITDA

Segment EBITDA consists of income from operations before depreciation and amortization. Segment EBITDA is the measure management uses to evaluate segment performance, and we present Segment EBITDA to enhance your understanding of our operating performance. We use Segment EBITDA as one criterion for evaluating our performance relative to that of our peers. We believe that Segment EBITDA is an operating performance measure, and not a liquidity measure, that provides investors and analysts with a

38

---

measure of operating results unaffected by differences in capital structures, capital investment cycles and ages of related assets among otherwise comparable companies. However, Segment EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”), and Segment EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. You should not consider Segment EBITDA as an alternative to operating or net income determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, as an indicator of operating performance or as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, or as an indicator of cash flows, or as a measure of liquidity.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2013

The following table summarizes our consolidated results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:

 

Summary of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2014

The following is a summary of changes affecting our operating results for the three months ended June 30, 2014.

Net revenues decreased $32.3 million, or 9.6%, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of the prior year. Net revenues in our North American units decreased $39.6 million primarily from lower retail revenues from a decline in retail member volumes in our Membership business and lower revenue in our Insurance and Package business primarily from a higher cost of insurance and lower Package members. International net revenues increased by $7.3 million primarily from higher retail membership revenue associated with increased members.

         Segment EBITDA decreased $22.5 million as the impact of the lower net revenues was partially offset by lower marketing and commissions and lower general and administrative costs.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2013

The following section provides an overview of our consolidated results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013.

39

---

Net Revenues. During the three months ended June 30, 2014 we reported net revenues of $303.8 million, a decrease of $32.3 million, or 9.6%, as compared to net revenues of $336.1 million in the comparable period of 2013.  Net revenues of our Membership Products decreased $23.9 million primarily due to a decline in retail member volumes related to the regulatory challenges facing large financial institution marketing partners with respect to new marketing campaign launches. Insurance and Package Products revenues decreased $14.9 million primarily due to a higher cost of insurance from higher claims experience. While there are likely several factors at play, we believe this is largely due to an acceleration of claims into this period in connection with the conversion to our new primary carrier. This claims activity appears to be due to the unanticipated velocity at which our legacy carrier has processed claims as they exit our relationship. Package revenue declined primarily due to the impact of lower average Package members. Loyalty Products net revenues decreased $0.9 million primarily due to the slower ramp-up of new client programs. International Products net revenues increased $7.3 million primarily from higher retail membership revenue associated with increased members and a favorable foreign exchange impact of $3.8 million.

Marketing and Commissions Expense. Marketing and commissions expense decreased by $7.1 million, or 5.6%, to $120.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 from $127.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013. Marketing and commissions decreased in our Membership business by $10.8 million, primarily attributable to lower commissions from lower retail member volumes, and was partially offset by higher costs of $3.6 million in our International business primarily from higher commissions and an increase from foreign exchange.

Operating Costs. Operating costs increased by $1.5 million, or 1.4%, to $106.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 from $104.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013. Operating costs increased $4.4 million in our International business primarily due to higher product, servicing and employee costs along with increases due to foreign exchange. This increase was partially offset by lower costs of $3.3 million in our Membership business primarily due to lower product and servicing costs associated with lower retail member volumes.

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense decreased by $4.4 million, or 9.8% to $40.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 from $44.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013. General and administrative costs decreased $14.5 million in our Insurance and Package business primarily from the absence in 2014 of a charge recorded in 2013 for $14.8 million related to a contract termination with our primary insurance carrier as part of our decision to transfer a significant portion of our AD&D business to a new carrier. Costs increased $6.1 million in our Membership business primarily from higher restructuring costs, principally severance. Corporate costs increased $4.8 million primarily due to professional fees of $5.9 million related to the May 2014 amendment to the Affinion Credit Facility completed in the second quarter of 2014 partially offset by lower stock compensation expense of $1.6 million primarily from the completed vesting of certain restricted stock units.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 to $29.1 million from $28.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, primarily from recording higher depreciation of $3.7 million primarily in our International business, principally the result of recent capital expenditures related to various systems upgrades. This increase was partially offset by lower amortization of $0.6 million on the intangible assets acquired in connection with the Company’s acquisition of the Cendant Marketing Services Division (the “Apollo Transactions”) as the majority of those intangibles are amortized on an accelerated basis. This amortization expense is based upon an allocation of values to intangible assets and is being amortized over lives ranging from 3 years to 15 years. In addition, lower amortization expense was recorded in 2014 as compared to 2013 in the amount of $1.6 million related to intangible assets acquired in the 2011 Webloyalty acquisition, principally member relationships which are amortized on an accelerated basis.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased by $5.2 million, or 12.7%, to $46.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 from $41.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to higher interest associated with 2014 borrowings on our revolving credit facility and higher interest from higher rate debt as a result of the debt exchange completed in the fourth quarter of 2013.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt. Loss on extinguishment of debt in 2014 includes $6.0 million of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the May 2014 amendment to the Affinion Credit Facility completed in the second quarter of 2014.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense increased by $0.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to an increase in the current state and deferred federal and foreign tax liabilities for the three months ended June 30, 2014, partially offset by a decrease in the current foreign and deferred state tax liabilities for the same period.

The Company’s effective income tax rates for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were (9.1)% and (32.4)%, respectively. The difference in the effective tax rates for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 is primarily a result of an increase in loss before income taxes and non-controlling interest of $10.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 to $44.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and an increase in the income tax provision from $3.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 to $4.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014. The Company’s tax rate is affected by recurring items,

40

---

such as tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income it earns in those jurisdictions. It is also affected by discrete items that may occur in any given year, but are not consistent from year to year. In addition to state and foreign income taxes and related foreign tax credits, the requirement to maintain valuation allowances had the most significant impact on the difference between the Company’s effective tax rate and the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35%.

Operating Segment Results

Net revenues and Segment EBITDA by operating segment are as follows:

 

 

Affinion North America

Membership Products. Membership Products net revenues decreased by $23.9 million, or 17.4%, to $113.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to $137.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013. Net revenues decreased primarily due to a decline in retail member volumes related to the regulatory challenges facing large financial institution marketing partners with respect to new marketing campaign launches.

Segment EBITDA decreased by $16.2 million, or 47.1%, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013. Segment EBITDA decreased as the impact of the lower net revenues of $23.9 million and higher general and administrative costs of $6.1 million was partially offset by lower marketing and commissions of $10.8 million and lower operating costs of $3.3 million. The lower marketing and commissions were primarily the result of reduced commissions principally from lower retail member volumes. Operating costs decreased primarily from lower product and servicing costs associated with the lower retail member volumes. General and administrative costs increased primarily from higher restructuring costs, principally severance.

Insurance and Package Products. Insurance and Package Products net revenues decreased by $14.9 million, or 20.6%, to $57.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to $72.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013. Insurance revenue decreased approximately $11.6 million primarily due to a higher cost of insurance from higher claims experience. While there are likely several factors at play, we believe this is largely due to an acceleration of claims into this period in connection with the conversion to our new primary carrier. This claims activity appears to be due to the unanticipated velocity at which our legacy carrier has processed claims as they exit our relationship. Package revenue decreased approximately $3.3 million primarily due to the impact of lower average Package members.

Segment EBITDA increased by $0.6 million, or 9.8%, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013 as the benefit from the absence in 2014 of costs associated with a contract termination settlement recorded in 2013 totaling $14.8 million, along with lower operating costs of $0.7 million, was substantially offset by the impact of the lower net revenues.

Loyalty Products. Revenues from Loyalty Products decreased by $0.9 million, or 2.1%, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 to $42.8 million as compared to $43.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 primarily due to the slower ramp-up of new client programs.

41

---

Segment EBITDA decreased by $2.1 million, or 10.9%, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to the decrease in net revenue and the ongoing investments in new channels and new client start-up costs.

Affinion International

International Products. International Products net revenues increased by $7.3 million, or 8.7%, to $90.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to $83.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013. Net revenues increased primarily from higher retail membership revenue in both our online and offline acquisition channels associated with increased members. Net revenues were also positively impacted by $3.8 million from foreign exchange.

Segment EBITDA was unchanged at $3.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and the three months ended June 30, 2013 as the positive impact of the higher revenue of $7.3 million and lower general and administrative expenses of $0.7 million was offset by higher marketing and commissions of $3.6 million primarily from higher commissions and the impact of foreign exchange and higher operating costs of $4.4 million primarily from higher product, servicing and employee costs and the impact of foreign exchange.

Corporate

Corporate costs increased by $4.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013 as professional fees of $5.9 million associated with the May 2014 Affinion Credit Facility amendment completed during the second quarter of 2014 were partially offset by lower stock compensation costs of $1.6 million primarily from the completed vesting of certain restricted stock units.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2013

The following table summarizes our consolidated results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:

 

Summary of Operating Results for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014

The following is a summary of changes affecting our operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2014.

Net revenues decreased $58.3 million, or 8.5%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of the prior year. Net revenues in our North American units decreased $74.2 million primarily from lower retail revenues from a decline in retail member volumes in our Membership business and lower revenue in our Insurance and Package business primarily from a higher

42

---

cost of insurance and lower Package members. International net revenues increased by $15.9 million primarily from higher retail membership revenue associated with increased members.

         Segment EBITDA decreased $55.9 million as the impact of the lower net revenues and higher general and administrative costs was partially offset by lower operating costs.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2013

The following section provides an overview of our consolidated results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013.

Net Revenues. During the six months ended June 30, 2014 we reported net revenues of $625.2 million, a decrease of $58.3 million, or 8.5%, as compared to net revenues of $683.5 million in the comparable period of 2013.  Net revenues of our Membership Products decreased $51.5 million primarily due to a decline in retail member volumes related to the regulatory challenges facing large financial institution marketing partners with respect to new marketing campaign launches. Insurance and Package Products revenues decreased $20.6 million primarily due to a higher cost of insurance from higher claims experience. While there are likely several factors at play, we believe this is largely due to an acceleration of claims into this period in connection with the conversion to our new primary carrier. This claims activity appears to be due to the unanticipated velocity at which our legacy carrier has processed claims as they exit our relationship. Package revenue declined primarily due to the impact of lower average Package members. Loyalty Products net revenues decreased $2.2 million primarily due to the slower ramp-up of new client programs. International Products net revenues increased $15.9 million primarily from higher retail membership revenue associated with increased members and a favorable foreign exchange impact of $5.8 million.

Marketing and Commissions Expense. Marketing and commissions expense increased by $0.6 million, or 0.2%, to $245.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 from $244.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. Marketing and commissions expense increased $14.3 million in our International business primarily from increased spending in our offline retail channel, higher commissions and an increase from foreign exchange, and higher costs in Insurance and Package of $1.5 million. These increases were partially offset by decreased costs in Membership of $15.4 million primarily attributable to lower commissions from lower retail member volumes.

Operating Costs. Operating costs decreased by $6.7 million, or 3.0%, to $214.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 from $220.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. Operating costs decreased $14.0 million in our Membership business primarily due to lower product and servicing costs associated with lower retail member volumes while costs increased $6.4 million in our International business primarily due to higher product, servicing and employee costs along with increases due to foreign exchange.

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense increased by $3.6 million, or 4.1% to $90.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 from $86.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. General and administrative costs increased $8.0 million in our International business primarily from accrued costs associated with certain regulatory matters which were partially offset by lower restructuring and employee costs. Corporate costs increased $6.4 million primarily due to $5.9 million in professional fees associated with the May 2014 amendment to the Affinion Credit Facility and an increase of $0.9 million in stock compensation costs as the impact of modifying a portion of the outstanding stock options by adjusting their exercise price and extending their contractual life was partially offset by lower expense from the completed vesting of certain restricted stock units. Costs increased $3.3 million in our Membership business primarily from higher costs associated with restructuring activities. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in our Insurance and Package business of $14.2 million primarily due to the benefit of the absence in 2014 of a charge recorded in 2013 for $14.8 million related to a contract termination with our primary insurance carrier as part of our decision to transfer a significant portion of our AD&D business to a new carrier.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $3.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 to $54.1 million from $58.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily from recording lower amortization of $1.1 million on the intangible assets acquired in connection with the Company’s acquisition of the Cendant Marketing Services Division (the “Apollo Transactions”) as the majority of those intangibles are amortized on an accelerated basis. This amortization expense is based upon an allocation of values to intangible assets and is being amortized over lives ranging from 3 years to 15 years. In addition, lower amortization expense was recorded in 2014 as compared to 2013 in the amount of $3.5 million related to intangible assets acquired in the 2011 Webloyalty acquisition, principally member relationships which are amortized on an accelerated basis. Depreciation expense increased $2.9 million primarily the result of recent capital expenditures related to various upgrades in international systems.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased by $8.9 million, or 10.8%, to $91.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 from $82.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to higher interest associated with 2014 borrowings on our revolving credit facility and higher interest from higher rate debt as a result of the debt exchange completed in the fourth quarter of 2013.

43

---

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt. Loss on extinguishment of debt in 2014 includes $6.0 million of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the May 2014 amendment to the Affinion Credit Facility completed in the second quarter of 2014.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense decreased by $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to a decrease in the deferred federal and current foreign tax liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2014, partially offset by an increase in the current state and deferred state and foreign tax liabilities for the same period.

The Company’s effective income tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were (10.8)% and (88.5)%, respectively. The difference in the effective tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 is primarily a result of the increase in loss before income taxes from $9.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 to $76.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and a decrease in the income tax provision from $8.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 to $8.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The Company’s tax rate is affected by recurring items, such as tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income it earns in those jurisdictions. It is also affected by discrete items that may occur in any given year, but are not consistent from year to year. In addition to state and foreign income taxes and related foreign tax credits, the requirement to maintain valuation allowances had the most significant impact on the difference between the Company’s effective tax rate and the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35%.

Operating Segment Results

Net revenues and Segment EBITDA by operating segment are as follows:

 

 

Affinion North America

Membership Products. Membership Products net revenues decreased by $51.5 million, or 18.3%, to $229.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to $281.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. Net revenues decreased primarily due to a decline in retail member volumes related to the regulatory challenges facing large financial institution marketing partners with respect to new marketing campaign launches.

Segment EBITDA decreased by $25.6 million, or 44.1%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013. Segment EBITDA decreased as the impact of the lower net revenues of $51.5 million and higher general and administrative costs of $3.3 million was partially offset by lower marketing and commissions of $15.4 million and lower operating costs of $14.0 million. The lower marketing and commissions were primarily the result of reduced commissions principally from lower retail member volumes. Operating costs decreased primarily from lower product and servicing costs associated with the lower retail member volumes. General and administrative costs increased from higher restructuring costs, principally severance.

44

---

Insurance and Package Products. Insurance and Package Products net revenues decreased by $20.6 million, or 13.8%, to $128.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to $148.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. Insurance revenue decreased approximately $14.2 million due to a higher cost of insurance from higher claims experience. While there are likely several factors at play, we believe this is largely due to an acceleration of claims into this period in connection with the conversion to our new primary carrier. This claims activity appears to be due to the unanticipated velocity at which our legacy carrier has processed claims as they exit our relationship. Package revenue decreased approximately $6.4 million primarily due to the impact of lower average Package members.

Segment EBITDA decreased by $7.3 million, or 20.7%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 as the benefit from the absence in 2014 of costs associated with a contract termination settlement recorded in 2013 totaling $14.8 million was more than offset by the impact of the lower net revenues and higher marketing and commissions expense.

Loyalty Products. Revenues from Loyalty Products decreased by $2.2 million, or 2.5%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 to $84.2 million as compared to $86.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 primarily due to the slower ramp-up of new client programs.

Segment EBITDA decreased by $3.8 million, or 10.6%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to the decrease in net revenue and ongoing investments in new channels and new client start-up costs.

Affinion International

International Products. International Products net revenues increased by $15.9 million, or 9.4%, to $184.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to $168.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. Net revenues increased primarily from higher retail membership revenue in both our online and offline acquisition channels associated with increased members. Net revenues were also positively impacted by $5.8 million from foreign exchange.

Segment EBITDA decreased by $12.8 million, or 145.5%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 as the positive impact of the higher revenue was more than offset by higher marketing and commissions of $14.3 million, higher operating costs of $6.4 million and higher general and administrative expenses of $8.0 million. Marketing and commissions increased primarily from increased spending in our offline retail channel, higher commissions and the impact of foreign exchange. Operating costs increased primarily from higher product, servicing and employee costs and the impact of foreign exchange. General and administrative costs increased primarily from accrued costs associated with certain regulatory matters which were partially offset by lower restructuring and employee costs.

Corporate

Corporate costs increased by $6.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 primarily from $5.9 million in professional fees associated with the May 2014 Affinion Credit Facility amendment completed during the second quarter of 2014 and higher stock compensation costs of $0.9 million as the impact of adjusting the exercise price of a portion of the outstanding stock options was partially offset by lower costs from the completed vesting of certain restricted stock units.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Financial Condition—June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013

 

Total assets decreased by $22.7 million principally due to (1) a decrease in other intangibles, net of $30.3 million, principally due to amortization expense of $30.3 million and (2) a decrease in profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers of $25.3 million as a significant portion of our AD&D business is being transferred to a new carrier with whom we do not have a profit-sharing arrangement. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in cash of $21.4 million (see “—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Cash Flows”).

Total liabilities increased by $62.9 million, principally due to an increase in long-term debt of $68.7 million, principally due to additional borrowings in connection with the amendment to the Company’s term loan and revolving credit facility.

45

---

Total deficit increased by $85.6 million, principally due to a net loss attributable to the Company of $84.8 million and foreign currency translation effect of $1.0 million.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary sources of liquidity on both a short-term and long-term basis are cash on hand and cash generated through operating and financing activities. Our primary cash needs are to service our indebtedness and for working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes. Many of the Company’s significant costs are variable in nature, including marketing and commissions. The Company has a great degree of flexibility in the amount and timing of marketing expenditures and focuses its marketing expenditures on its most profitable marketing opportunities. Commissions correspond directly with revenue generated and have been decreasing as a percentage of revenue over the last several years. We believe that, based on our current operations and anticipated growth, our cash on hand, cash flows from operating activities and borrowing availability under our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the next twelve months and in the foreseeable future, including quarterly amortization payments on our first lien term loan facility under our $1.3 billion amended and restated senior secured credit facility. The first lien term loan facility also requires mandatory prepayments based on excess cash flows as defined in our amended and restated senior secured credit facility.

The Company is a holding company, with no direct operations and no significant assets other than the direct and indirect ownership of its subsidiaries. Because we conduct our operations through our subsidiaries, our cash flows and our ability to service our indebtedness is dependent upon cash dividends and distributions or other transfers from our subsidiaries. Payments to us by our subsidiaries are contingent upon our subsidiaries’ earnings, but are not limited by our debt agreements, including our senior secured credit facility and the indentures governing our 2010 senior notes and our 2013 senior subordinated notes.

Although we historically have a working capital deficit, a major factor included in this deficit is deferred revenue resulting from the cash collected from annual memberships that is deferred until the appropriate refund period has concluded. In spite of our historical working capital deficit, we have been able to operate effectively primarily due to our cash flows from operations and our available revolving credit facility. However, as the membership base continues to shift away from memberships billed annually to memberships billed monthly, it will have a negative effect on our operating cash flow. We anticipate that our working capital deficit will continue for the foreseeable future.

On November 13, 2013, the Company loaned $18.9 million to Affinion Holdings to be utilized by Affinion Holdings to make the November 2013 interest payment on its 2010 senior notes.

Cash Flows—Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

At June 30, 2014, we had $41.0 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand, a decrease of $42.8 million from $83.8 million at June 30, 2013. The following table summarizes our cash flows and compares changes in our cash and cash equivalents on hand to the same period in the prior year.

 

Operating Activities

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we generated $78.8 million less cash from operating activities than during the six months ended June 30, 2013. Segment EBITDA decreased by $55.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 (see “—Results of Operations”).

Investing Activities

We used $3.6 million more cash in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period in 2013. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we used $23.7 million for capital expenditures. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we used $19.1 million for capital expenditures and $0.9 million for acquisition-related payments.

46

---

Financing Activities

We provided cash from financing activities of $45.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to using cash of $5.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we had net repayments under Affinion’s revolving credit facility of $46.0 million, refinanced a portion of debt resulting in new second-lien term loan borrowings of $425.0 million and repayments of term loan debt of $311.6 million, paid financing costs of $18.9 million and made other principal payments on our debt of $0.3 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we made principal payments on our debt of $5.9 million.

Credit Facilities and Long-Term Debt

As a result of the Apollo Transactions, we became a highly leveraged company, and we have incurred additional indebtedness and refinancing indebtedness since the Apollo Transactions. In April 2010, we entered into an amended and restated senior secured credit facility comprised of an $875.0 million term loan and a $125.0 million revolving credit facility. In December 2010, we entered into an agreement with two of our lenders resulting in an increase in the revolving credit facility to $165.0 million. In February 2011, we incurred incremental borrowings of $250.0 million under our term loan facility.

In December 2013, we and Affinion Holdings completed exchange offers and consent solicitations pursuant to which, among other things, (i) $352.9 million principal amount of our 2006 senior subordinated notes were exchanged by the holders thereof for $360.0 million principal amount of Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes issued by our wholly-owned subsidiary, Affinion Investments, LLC  (“Affinion Investments”), (ii) we issued $360.0 million principal amount of 2013 senior subordinated notes to Affinion Investments in exchange for all of our 2006 senior subordinated notes received by it in the exchange offer and (iii) we entered into a supplemental indenture pursuant to which substantially all of the restrictive covenants were eliminated in the indenture governing our 2006 senior subordinated notes.

As of June 30, 2014, we had approximately $2.0 billion in indebtedness. Payments required to service this indebtedness have substantially increased our liquidity requirements as compared to prior years due to higher principal amounts and higher interest rates associated with the new indebtedness incurred in December 2013 and the related amendment to our senior secured credit facility that increased the applicable margins and the May 2014 amendment to our credit facility that included the issuance of second lien term debt.

As part of the Apollo Transactions, we (a) issued $270.0 million principal amount of 10 1/₈% senior notes due October 15, 2013 ($266.4 million net of discount) on October 17, 2005 and an additional $34.0 million aggregate principal amount of follow on senior notes on May 3, 2006 (collectively, the “2005 senior notes”), (b) entered into our senior secured credit facility, consisting of a term loan facility in the principal amount of $860.0 million (which amount does not reflect the $231.0 million in principal prepayments that we made prior to amendment and restatement of the senior secured credit facility in April, 2010) and a revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount of up to $100.0 million and (c) entered into a senior subordinated bridge loan facility in the principal amount of $383.6 million.

Our senior subordinated bridge loan facility was refinanced in part with the proceeds from the offering of 2006 senior subordinated notes. On April 26, 2006, we issued $355.5 million aggregate principal amount of 2006 senior subordinated notes and applied the gross proceeds of $350.5 million to repay $349.5 million of outstanding borrowings under our senior subordinated loan facility, plus accrued interest, and used cash on hand to pay fees and expenses associated with such issuance. The interest on our 2006 senior subordinated notes is payable semi-annually. We may redeem some or all of the 2006 senior subordinated notes at the redemption prices (generally at a premium) set forth in the agreement governing the 2006 senior subordinated notes. The 2006 senior subordinated notes are unsecured obligations. At June 30, 2014, the 2006 senior subordinated notes were guaranteed by the same subsidiaries that guarantee our senior secured credit facility (other than Affinion Investments and Affinion Investments II) and our 2010 senior notes. In December 2013, Affinion Investments exchanged $352.9 million face amount of our outstanding 2006 senior subordinated notes for $360.0 million face amount Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes. Affinion Investments then exchanged with the Company all of the 2006 senior subordinated notes received by it in the exchange offer for the Company’s 2013 senior subordinated notes.

On April 9, 2010, the Company, as borrower, and Affinion Holdings, as a guarantor, entered into a $1.0 billion amended and restated senior secured credit facility with its lenders, amending our senior secured credit facility. We refer to the amended and restated senior secured credit facility, as amended from time to time, including by the Incremental Assumption Agreements (as defined below) and the May 2014 amendment as “our senior secured credit facility.” Our senior secured credit facility initially consisted of a five-year $125.0 million revolving credit facility and an $875.0 million term loan facility.

On December 13, 2010, the Company, as borrower, Affinion Holdings and certain of the Company’s subsidiaries entered into an Incremental Assumption Agreement with two of its lenders (the “Revolver Incremental Assumption Agreement,” and together with the Term Loan Incremental Assumption Agreement, the “Incremental Assumption Agreements”) which resulted in an increase in the

47

---

revolving credit facility from $125.0 million to $160.0 million, with a further increase to $165.0 million in January 2011. On February 11, 2011, the Company, as borrower, and Affinion Holdings, and certain of the Company’s subsidiaries entered into, and simultaneously closed under, the Term Loan Incremental Assumption Agreement, which resulted in an increase in the term loan facility from $875.0 million to $1.125 billion. On November 20, 2012, the Company, as Borrower, and Affinion Holdings entered into an amendment to the Affinion Credit Facility, which (i) increased the margins on LIBOR loans from 3.50% to 5.00% and on base rate loans from 2.50% to 4.00%, (ii) replaced the financial covenant requiring the Company to maintain a maximum consolidated leverage ratio with a financial covenant requiring Affinion to maintain a maximum senior secured leverage ratio, and (iii) adjusted the ratios under the financial covenant requiring Affinion to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio. On December 12, 2013, in connection with the refinancing of our 2006 senior subordinated notes and Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes, the Company, as Borrower, and Affinion Holdings, entered into an amendment to the Affinion Credit Facility, which (i) provided permission for the consummation of the exchange offers for our 2006 senior subordinated notes and Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes; (ii) removed the springing maturity provisions applicable to the term loan facility; (iii) modified the senior secured leverage ratio financial covenant in the Affinion Credit Facility; (iv) provided additional flexibility for us to make dividends to Affinion Holdings to be used to make certain payments with respect to Affinion Holdings’ indebtedness and to repay, repurchase or redeem subordinated indebtedness of the Company; and (v) increased the interest margins by 0.25% to 5.25% on LIBOR loans and 4.25% on base rate loans. The amendment became effective upon the satisfaction of the conditions precedent set forth therein, including the payment by the Company of the consent fee equal to 0.25% of the sum of (i) the aggregate principal amount of all term loans and (ii) the revolving loan commitments in effect, in each case, held by each lender that entered into the amendment on the date of effectiveness of the amendment.

On May 20, 2014, the Company, as borrower, and Affinion Holdings entered into an amendment to our senior secured credit facility, which (i) extended the maturity to April 30, 2018 of $775.0 million in aggregate principal amount of existing senior secured term loan and existing senior secured revolving loans, which loans were designated as first lien term loans (the “First Lien Term Loans”), (ii) extended the maturity to October 31, 2018 of $377.9 million in aggregate principal amount of existing senior secured term loans on a second lien senior secured basis, which, together with additional borrowings obtained on the same terms, total $425.0 million (the “Second Lien Term Loans”) , (iii) extended the maturity to January 29, 2018 of $80.0 million of the commitments (and related obligations) under the existing senior secured revolving credit facility on a first lien senior secured basis, (iv) reduced the commitments under the existing senior secured revolving credit facility by $85.0 million and (v) removed the existing financial covenant requiring the Company to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio.

The revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility and a swingline loan subfacility. The First Lien Term Loan facility matures in April 2018 and the Second Lien Term Loan facility matures in October 2018. The First Lien Term Loan facility provides for quarterly amortization payments totaling 1% per annum, with the balance payable upon the final maturity date. The Second Lien Term Loan facility does not provide for quarterly amortization payments. Our senior secured credit facility also requires mandatory prepayments of the outstanding term loans based on excess cash flow (as defined), if any, and the proceeds from certain specified transactions. The interest rates with respect to First Lien Term Loans and revolving loans under the amended Affinion Credit Facility are based on, at the Company’s option, (a) the higher of (i) adjusted LIBOR and (ii) 1.50%, in each case plus 5.25%, or (b) the highest of (i) Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas’ prime rate, (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% and (iii) 2.50% (“ABR”), in each case plus 4.25%. The interest rates with respect to Second Lien Term Loans under the amended Affinion Credit Facility are based on, at the Company’s option, (a) the higher of (i) adjusted LIBOR and (ii) 1.50%, in each case plus 7.00%, or (b) the highest of (i) Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas’ prime rate, (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% and (iii) 2.50% (“ABR”), in each case plus 6.00%. The weighted average interest rate on the term loan for the periods from April 1, 2014 through May 20, 2014 and from January 1, 2014 through May 20, 2014 was 6.75% and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was 6.5% per annum for both periods. The weighted average interest rate on the First Lien Term Loan and Second Lien Term Loan for the period from May 20, 2014 through June 30, 2014 was 6.75% and 8.50%, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on revolving credit facility borrowings for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was 7.1% and 7.3% per annum, respectively. Our obligations under our senior secured credit facility are, and our obligations under any interest rate protection or other hedging arrangements entered into with a lender or any of its affiliates will be, guaranteed by Affinion Holdings and by each of our existing and subsequently acquired or organized domestic subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions. Our senior secured credit facility is secured to the extent legally permissible by substantially all the assets of (i) Affinion Holdings, which consists of a pledge of all our capital stock and (ii) us and the subsidiary guarantors, including but not limited to: (a) a pledge of substantially all capital stock held by us or any subsidiary guarantor and (b) security interests in substantially all tangible and intangible assets of us and each subsidiary guarantor, subject to certain exceptions. Our senior secured credit facility also contains financial, affirmative and negative covenants. The negative covenants in our senior secured credit facility include, among other things, limitations (all of which are subject to certain exceptions) on our (and in certain cases, Affinion Holdings’) ability to declare dividends and make other distributions, redeem or repurchase our capital stock; prepay, redeem or repurchase certain of our subordinated indebtedness; make loans or investments (including acquisitions); incur additional indebtedness (subject to certain exceptions); enter into agreements that would restrict the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends; merge or enter into acquisitions; sell our assets; and enter into transactions with our affiliates. The credit facility also requires us to comply with a financial maintenance covenant with a maximum ratio of senior secured debt (as defined in our senior secured credit facility) to EBITDA (as defined in our senior secured credit facility) of 4.25:1.00. A portion of the April 2010 proceeds of the term loan under our senior secured credit facility were utilized to repay the outstanding balance of the then existing senior secured term loan, including accrued interest, of $629.7 million and pay fees and expenses of

48

---

approximately $27.0 million. Any borrowings under the revolving credit facility are available to fund our working capital requirements, capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes.

In January 2011, utilizing available cash on hand, the Company paid a dividend of approximately $123.4 million to Affinion Holdings. Affinion Holdings utilized the proceeds of the dividend and available cash on hand to (i) redeem Affinion Holdings’ outstanding preferred stock with a liquidation preference of approximately $41.2 million, (ii) pay a dividend to Affinion Holdings’ stockholders (including holders of restricted stock units) of $1.35 per share (approximately $115.4 million in the aggregate), (iii) pay a one-time cash bonus to Affinion Holdings’ option holders of approximately $9.6 million and (iv) pay additional amounts for transaction fees and expenses.

In February 2011, the Company used a portion of the Incremental Term Loans to pay a dividend of approximately $199.8 million to Affinion Holdings. Affinion Holdings used the proceeds of the dividend to (i) redeem Affinion Holdings’ outstanding preferred stock with a liquidation preference of approximately $5.4 million, (ii) pay a dividend to Affinion Holdings’ stockholders (including holders of restricted stock units) of $1.50 per share (approximately $128.2 million in the aggregate), (iii) pay a one-time cash bonus to certain of Affinion Holdings’ option holders of approximately $5.2 million and (iv) pay additional amounts for transaction fees and expenses.

On November 19, 2010, the Company completed a private offering of $475.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2010 senior notes providing net proceeds of $471.5 million. The 2010 senior notes bear interest at 7.875% per annum payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing on June 15, 2011. The 2010 senior notes will mature on December 15, 2018. The 2010 senior notes are redeemable at the Company’s option prior to maturity. The indenture governing the 2010 senior notes contains negative covenants which restrict the ability of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries to engage in certain transactions and also contains customary events of default. The Company’s obligations under the 2010 senior notes are jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of the Company’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee the Company’s indebtedness under its senior secured credit facility (other than Affinion Investments and Affinion Investments II). The 2010 senior notes and guarantees thereof are senior unsecured obligations of the Company and rank equally with all of the Company’s and the guarantors’ existing and future senior indebtedness and senior to the Company’s and the guarantors’ existing and future subordinated indebtedness. The 2010 senior notes are therefore effectively subordinated to the Company’s and the guarantors’ existing and future secured indebtedness, including the Company’s obligations under its senior secured credit facility, to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness. The 2010 senior notes are structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other obligations of each of the Company’s existing and future subsidiaries that are not guarantors, including the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes. On August 24, 2011, pursuant to the registration rights agreement entered into in connection with the issuance of the 2010 senior notes, the Company completed a registered exchange offer and exchanged all of the then-outstanding 2010 senior notes for a like principal amount of 2010 senior notes that have been registered under the Securities Act. The Company used substantially all of the net proceeds of the offering of the 2010 senior notes to repay all of the 2005 senior notes and the 2009 senior notes.

On December 12, 2013, the Company completed a private offer to exchange the Company’s 2006 senior subordinated notes for Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes, pursuant to which $360.0 million aggregate principal amount of Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes were issued in exchange for $352.9 million aggregate principal amount of 2006 senior subordinated notes. Under the terms of the exchange offer, for each $1,000 principal amount of 2006 senior subordinated notes tendered at or prior to the consent time, holders received $1,020 principal amount of Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes. For each $1,000 principal amount of 2006 senior subordinated notes tendered during the offer period but after the consent period, holders received $1,000 principal amount of Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes. The Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes bear interest at 13.50% per annum, payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing on February 15, 2014. The Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes will mature on August 15, 2018. Affinion Investments may redeem some or all of the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes at any time on or after December 12, 2016 at redemption prices (generally at a premium) set forth in the indenture governing the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes. In addition, prior to December 12, 2016, up to 35% of the outstanding Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes are redeemable at the option of Affinion Investments, with the net proceeds raised by the Company or Affinion Holdings in one or more equity offerings, at 113.50% of their principal amount. In addition, prior to December 12, 2016, the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes redeemed plus a “make-whole” premium. The indenture governing the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes contains negative covenants which restrict the ability of Affinion Investments, any future restricted subsidiaries of Affinion Investments and one of the Company’s other wholly-owned subsidiaries that guarantees the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes to engage in certain transactions and also contains customary events of default. Affinion Investments’ obligations under the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes are guaranteed on an unsecured senior subordinated basis by Affinion Investments II, LLC (“Affinion Investments II”). Each of Affinion Investments and Affinion Investments II is an unrestricted subsidiary of the Company and guarantees the Company’s indebtedness under its senior secured credit facility but does not guarantee the Company’s other indebtedness. The Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes and guarantee thereof are unsecured senior subordinated obligations of Affinion Investments, as issuer, and Affinion Investments II, as guarantor, and rank junior in right of payment to their respective guarantees of the Company’s senior secured credit facility.  

49

---

On December 12, 2013, Affinion Investments exchanged with the Company all of the 2006 senior subordinated notes received by it in the exchange offer for Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes. Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes bear interest at 13.50% per annum payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing on February 15, 2014. The 2013 senior subordinated notes will mature on August 15, 2018. The 2013 senior subordinated notes are redeemable at the Company’s option prior to maturity. The indenture governing the 2013 senior subordinated notes contains negative covenants which restrict the ability of Affinion and its restricted subsidiaries to engage in certain transactions and also contains customary events of default. Affinion’s obligations under the 2013 senior subordinated notes are jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured senior subordinated basis by each of Affinion’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee Affinion’s indebtedness under its senior secured credit facility (other than Affinion Investments and Affinion Investments II). The 2013 senior subordinated notes and guarantees thereof are unsecured senior subordinated obligations of Affinion’s and rank junior to all of Affinion’s and the guarantors’ existing and future senior indebtedness, pari passu with Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes and senior to Affinion’s and the guarantors’ future subordinated indebtedness. Although Affinion Investments is the only holder of the Affinion 2013 senior subordinated notes, the trustee for the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes, and holders of at least 25% of the principal amount of the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes will have the right as third party beneficiaries to enforce the remedies available to Affinion Investments against Affinion, and Affinion Investments will not be able to amend the covenants in the note agreement governing the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes in favor of Affinion unless it has received consent from the holders of a majority of the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes.

In connection with the exchange offer and consent solicitation relating to the 2006 senior subordinated notes and the issuance of the Company’s 2013 senior subordinated notes, the Company incurred $5.9 million of financing costs, which have been included in general and administrative expenses on the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

At June 30, 2014, on a consolidated basis, the Company had $773.1 million of First Lien Term Loans outstanding, $425.0 million of Second Lien Term Loans outstanding, $475.0 million ($473.0 million net of discount) outstanding under the 2010 senior notes, $2.6 million outstanding under the 2006 senior subordinated notes and $360.0 million ($352.6 million net of discount) outstanding under the 2013 senior subordinated notes. At June 30, 2014, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility and the Company had $65.2 million available under the revolving credit facility after giving effect to the issuance of $14.8 million of letters of credit.

Covenant Compliance

Our senior secured credit facility and the indentures that govern our 2010 senior notes and our 2013 senior subordinated notes contain various restrictive covenants. They prohibit us from prepaying indebtedness that is junior to such debt (subject to certain exceptions). Our senior secured credit facility requires us to maintain a specified maximum senior secured leverage ratio. The senior secured leverage ratio as defined in our senior secured credit facility (senior secured debt, as defined, to Adjusted EBITDA, as defined) must be equal to or less than 4.25 to 1.0 at June 30, 2014. In addition, our senior secured credit facility, among other things, restricts our ability to incur indebtedness or liens, make investments or declare or pay any dividends to our parent. The indentures governing the 2010 senior notes and the 2013 senior subordinated notes, among other things: (a) limit our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, incur liens, pay dividends or make certain other restricted payments and enter into certain transactions with affiliates; (b) limit our ability to enter into agreements that would restrict the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or make certain payments to us; and (c) place restrictions on our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to merge or consolidate with any other person or sell, assign, transfer, convey or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets. However, all of these covenants are subject to significant exceptions. As of June 30, 2014, the Company was in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its debt agreements and expects to be in compliance over the next twelve months.

We have the ability to incur additional debt, subject to limitations imposed by our senior secured credit facility and the indentures governing our 2010 senior notes and 2013 senior subordinated notes. Under the indentures governing our 2010 senior notes and our 2013 senior subordinated notes, in addition to specified permitted indebtedness, we will be able to incur additional indebtedness as long as on a pro forma basis our fixed charge coverage ratio (the ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to consolidated fixed charges as computed under such indentures) is at least 2.0 to 1.0.

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures to GAAP Financial Measures

Adjusted EBITDA consists of income from operations before depreciation and amortization further adjusted to exclude non-cash and unusual items and other adjustments permitted in our debt agreements to test the permissibility of certain types of transactions, including debt incurrence. We believe that the inclusion of Adjusted EBITDA is appropriate as a liquidity measure. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of liquidity or financial performance under U.S. GAAP and Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. You should not consider Adjusted EBITDA as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, as an indicator of cash flows, as a measure of liquidity, as an alternative to operating or net income determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP or as an indicator of operating performance.

50

---

Set forth below is a reconciliation of our consolidated net cash used in operating activities for the twelve months ended June 30, 2014 to Adjusted EBITDA.

 

 

51

---

Set forth below is a reconciliation of our consolidated net loss attributable to Affinion Group, Inc. for the twelve months ended June 30, 2014 to Adjusted EBITDA as required by our credit facility and the indentures governing our 2010 senior notes and 2013 senior subordinated notes.

 

 

Affinion Group Holdings, Inc.’s Dependence on Us to Service its Obligations

On October 5, 2010, Affinion Holdings issued $325.0 million aggregate principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes, and applied the gross proceeds, together with cash distributions from the Company, to repay the then-outstanding Affinion Holdings Loan Agreement in full, to pay the related fees and expenses and for general corporate purposes. The interest on Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes is payable semi-annually. Affinion Holdings may redeem some or all of Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes at the redemption prices (generally at a premium) set forth in the indenture governing Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes.

52

---

Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes are unsecured obligations and are not guaranteed by the Company or any of its subsidiaries. Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes contain restrictive covenants related primarily to Affinion Holdings’ ability to distribute dividends to Affinion Holdings’ stockholders, redeem or repurchase capital stock, sell assets, issue additional debt or merge with or acquire other companies. As a holding company with no significant assets other than the ownership of 100% of our common stock, Affinion Holdings will depend on our cash flows to make any cash interest payments on Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes.

On December 12, 2013, Affinion Holdings issued $292.8 million aggregate principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes, together with 13.5 million Series A warrants and 70.2 million Series B warrants, in exchange for $292.8 million aggregate principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes. Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes bear interest at 13.75% per annum, payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year, commencing on September 15, 2014. At Affinion Holdings’ option, it may elect to pay interest (i) entirely in cash (“Cash Interest”), (ii) entirely by increasing the principal amount of  Affinion Holdings’ outstanding 2013 senior notes or by issuing PIK notes (“PIK Interest”), or (iii) 50% as Cash Interest and 50% as PIK Interest; provided that if (i) no Default or Event of Default (each as defined in the Affinion Credit Facility) shall have occurred and be continuing or would result from such interest payment, (ii) immediately after giving effect to such interest payment, on a pro forma basis, the consolidated leverage ratio (as defined in the Affinion Credit Facility) of Affinion is less than or equal to 5.0:1.0 as of the last day of the most recently completed fiscal quarter preceding the interest payment date for which financial statements have been delivered to the agent under the Affinion Credit Facility and (iii) immediately after giving effect to such interest payment, on a pro forma basis, the Adjusted Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Note Agreement) of Affinion is less than or equal to 5.0:1.0, then Affinion Holdings shall be required to pay interest on Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes for such interest period in cash. PIK Interest accrues at 13.75% per annum plus 0.75%. Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes will mature on September 15, 2018. Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes are senior secured obligations of Affinion Holdings and rank pari passu in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness of Affinion Holdings, junior in right of payment to all secured indebtedness of Affinion Holdings secured by liens having priority to the liens securing Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes up to the value of the assets subject to such liens, and senior in right of payment to unsecured indebtedness of Affinion Holdings to the extent of the security of the collateral securing Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes and all future subordinated indebtedness of Affinion Holdings.

On June 9, 2014, in connection with its offer to exchange Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes for Series A warrants to purchase its Class B common stock, Affinion Holdings issued warrants to purchase up to approximately 30.3 million shares of Class B common stock in exchange for approximately $88.7 million aggregate principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes.

As described above, we expect that Affinion Holdings will rely on distributions from us in order to pay any cash amounts due in respect of Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes and Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes. However, our ability to make distributions to Affinion Holdings is restricted by covenants contained in our amended and restated senior secured credit facility and the indentures governing our 2010 senior notes and our 2013 senior subordinated notes and by Delaware law. To the extent we make distributions to Affinion Holdings, the amount of cash available to us to pay principal of, and interest on, our outstanding debt, including our amended and restated senior secured credit facility, our 2010 senior notes, our 2006 senior subordinated notes and our 2013 senior subordinated notes, will be reduced, and we would have less cash available for other purposes, which could negatively impact our financial condition, our results of operations and our ability to maintain or expand our business. A failure to pay principal of, or interest on, our debt, including our senior secured credit facility, our 2010 senior notes, our 2006 senior subordinated notes and our 2013 senior subordinated notes, would constitute an event of default under the applicable debt agreements, giving the holders of that debt the right to accelerate its maturity. In addition, to the extent we are not able to make distributions to Affinion Holdings because of the restrictions in our debt agreements or otherwise, then Affinion Holdings may not have sufficient cash on hand to service its obligations under Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes and Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes. Any failure by Affinion Holdings to pay principal of, or interest on, Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes or Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes would constitute an event of default under our amended and restated senior secured credit facility, giving the lenders thereunder the right to accelerate the repayment of all borrowings thereunder, which acceleration would also give rise to an event of default under our 2010 senior notes, our 2006 senior subordinated notes and 2013 senior subordinated notes. If any of our debt is accelerated, we may not have sufficient cash available to repay it in full and we may be unable to refinance such debt on satisfactory terms or at all.

Debt Repurchases

We or our affiliates have, in the past, and may, from time to time in the future, purchase any of our or Affinion Holdings’ indebtedness. Any such future purchases may be made through open market or privately negotiated transactions with third parties or pursuant to one or more tender or exchange offers or otherwise, upon such terms and at such prices as we or any such affiliates may determine.

Critical Accounting Policies

In presenting our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported therein. We believe that the estimates, assumptions and judgments involved in the accounting policies related to revenue recognition, accounting for marketing costs, stock-based compensation, valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, valuation of interest rate swaps

53

---

and valuation of tax assets and liabilities could potentially affect our reported results and as such, we consider these to be our critical accounting policies. Several of the estimates and assumptions we are required to make relate to matters that are inherently uncertain, as they pertain to future events. However, certain events outside our control cannot be predicted and, as such, they cannot be contemplated in evaluating such estimates and assumptions. We believe that the estimates and assumptions used when preparing our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were the most appropriate at the time. Significant estimates include accounting for profit sharing receivables from insurance carriers, accruals and income tax valuation allowances, litigation accruals, estimated fair value of stock based compensation, estimated fair values of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations and estimated fair values of financial instruments. In addition, we refer you to our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, included in our Form 10-K for a summary of our significant accounting policies.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

We do not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

The following table provides information about the Company’s financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. The table presents principal cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity for the Company’s long-term debt as of June 30, 2014 (dollars are in millions unless otherwise indicated):

 

 

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts

On a limited basis the Company has entered into 30 day foreign currency forward contracts, and upon expiration of the contracts, entered into successive 30 day foreign currency forward contracts. The contracts have been entered into to mitigate the Company’s foreign currency exposures related to intercompany loans which are not expected to be repaid within the next twelve months and that are denominated in Euros and British pounds. At June 30, 2014, the Company had in place contracts to sell EUR 26.6 million and receive $36.2 million and to sell GBP 13.9 million and receive $23.7 million.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company recognized a realized loss on the forward contracts of $0.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recognized a realized loss on the forward contracts of $1.1 million and a realized gain on the forward contracts of $1.5 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2014, the Company had a de minimis unrealized loss on the foreign currency forward contracts.

At June 30, 2014, the Company’s estimated fair values of its foreign currency forward contracts are based upon available market information. The fair value of a foreign currency forward contract is based on significant other observable inputs, adjusted for contract restrictions and other terms specific to the foreign currency forward contracts. The fair values have been determined after consideration of foreign currency exchange rates and the creditworthiness of the parties to the foreign currency forward contracts. The counterparty to the foreign currency forward contracts is a major financial institution. The Company does not expect any losses from non-performance by the counterparty.

Credit Risk and Exposure

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of receivables, profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers and prepaid commissions. We manage such risk by evaluating the financial position and creditworthiness of such counterparties. As of June 30, 2014, approximately $18.2 million of the profit-sharing receivable was due from one insurance carrier. Receivables and profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers are from various marketing, insurance and business partners and we maintain an allowance for losses, based upon expected collectability. Commission advances are periodically evaluated as to recovery.

 

54

---

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Control and Procedures. The Company, under the direction of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has established disclosure controls and procedures (“Disclosure Controls”) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. The Disclosure Controls are also intended to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls or our “internal controls over financial reporting” (“Internal Controls”) will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Notwithstanding the foregoing, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives.

As of June 30, 2014, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon their evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of June 30, 2014, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

55

---

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceeding.

Information required by this Item is contained in Note 7 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements within Part I of this Form 10-Q.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The following risk factors supplement and/or update the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

We are subject to legal actions and governmental investigations that could require us to incur significant expenses and, if resolved adversely to us, could impede our ability to market our programs and services, result in a loss of members and end-customers, reduce revenues and profitability and damage our reputation.

 

We are involved in claims, legal proceedings and state, federal and foreign governmental inquiries related to employment matters, contract disputes, business and marketing practices, trademark and copyright infringement claims and other commercial matters. Additionally, certain of our marketing partners have become, and others may become, involved in legal proceedings or governmental inquiries relating to our products or marketing practices. As a result, we may be subject to indemnification obligations under our marketing agreements. For example, on April 7, 2014 and April 9, 2014, Bank of America, N.A. and FIA Card Services, N.A. entered into consent orders (the “OCC and CFPB Consent Orders”) with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”), respectively, relating to their credit protection products and identity theft protection products (which included certain of our identity theft protection products). On April 18, 2014, Bank of America, N.A. and FIA Card Services, N.A. notified us that they have commenced an arbitration proceeding against us seeking, among other things, indemnification for losses, costs, and liabilities that Bank of America and FIA Card Services, N.A. incurred relating to our identity theft protection products that were the subject of the OCC and CFPB Consent Orders, which losses include customer refunds and reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses. While we cannot predict the outcome of pending suits, claims, investigations and inquiries, the cost of responding to and defending such suits, as well as the ultimate resolution of any of these matters, could require us to incur significant expenses and, if resolved adversely to us, could impede our ability to market our programs and services, result in a loss of members and end-customers, reduce revenues and profitability and damage our reputation and otherwise have a material effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that our accruals for legal actions or investigations will be sufficient to satisfy all related claims and expenses.

 

The Company has received in the past, and may receive in the future, inquiries from numerous state attorneys general and U.S. federal agencies and U.K. regulatory agencies relating to the marketing of its membership programs and its compliance with consumer protection statutes. The Company responded to these regulatory bodies’ requests for documents and information and is in active discussions with them regarding their investigations and, in some cases, the resolution of these matters. Settlement of such matters may include payment by the Company of the costs of the investigation, restitution to consumers and injunctive relief. For example, as reported in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 10, 2013, we entered into a settlement agreement with 47 state attorneys general with respect to the legacy marketing practices in our membership business known as “online data pass” and “live-check marketing.”

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity in Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

 

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure.

Not applicable.

 

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

 

56

---

Item 6. Exhibits.

 

 

 

 

 

57

---

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

 

 

S-1

---

EXHIBIT INDEX