CROSSROADS LIQUIDATING TRUST - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - CROSSROADS LIQUIDATING TRUST	a50912392_ex31-1.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - CROSSROADS LIQUIDATING TRUST	a50912392_ex32-1.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - CROSSROADS LIQUIDATING TRUST	a50912392_ex32-2.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - CROSSROADS LIQUIDATING TRUST	a50912392_ex31-2.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-53504

BDCA VENTURE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Maryland		26-2582882
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

5251 DTC Parkway, Suite 1100

Greenwood Village, CO 80111

(Address of principal executive office)

(720) 889-0139

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


	Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer ¨
	Non-accelerated filer x		Smaller reporting company ¨
	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

The number of shares of the issuer’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding as of July 25, 2014 was 9,786,601.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	1
	Statements of Assets and Liabilities (unaudited) as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013	1
	Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013	2
	Statements of Changes in Net Assets (unaudited) for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013	3
	Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013	4
	Schedule of Investments as of June 30, 2014 (unaudited)	5
	Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2013 (unaudited)	8
	Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements	11
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	31
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	77
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	77
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	78
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	78
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	78
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	78
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	78
Item 5.	Other Information	78
Item 6.	Exhibits	79
SIGNATURES

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

Keating Capital, Inc.

Statements of Assets and Liabilities

(Unaudited)

	June 30,			December 31,
	2014			2013

Assets
Investments in portfolio company securities at fair value:
Non-control/non-affiliate investments:
Private portfolio companies
(Cost: $44,013,609 and $42,574,747, respectively)	$	46,245,603		$	44,282,569
Publicly-traded portfolio companies
(Cost: $10,333,329 and $8,999,996, respectively)		11,935,475			11,554,236
Affiliate investments:
Private portfolio companies
(Cost: $4,000,000 and $4,000,000, respectively)		6,140,000			6,140,000
Total, investments in portfolio company securities at fair value		64,321,078			61,976,805
(Cost: $58,346,938 and $55,574,743, respectively)

Cash and cash equivalents		9,841,180			13,537,328
Prepaid expenses and other assets		42,234			102,421
Due from related parties		97,866			-

Total assets	$	74,302,358		$	75,616,554

Liabilities
Base management fees payable to investment adviser	$	122,038		$	126,515
Accrued incentive fees payable to investment adviser		2,388,474			2,216,888
Administrative expenses payable to investment adviser		54,357			51,755
Accounts payable		87,350			47,709
Dividends payable		-			104,072
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		3,731			30,145

Total liabilities		2,655,950			2,577,084

Net assets
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 200,000,000 authorized; 10,235,042 and
9,997,343 shares issued, respectively	$	10,235		$	9,997
Additional paid-in capital		73,247,928			71,806,893
Treasury stock, at cost, 448,441 and 448,441 shares held, respectively		(2,962,594	)		(2,962,594	)
Accumulated net investment loss		(3,987,451	)		(2,216,888	)
Accumulated distributions in excess of net realized gains on investments		(635,850	)		-
Net unrealized appreciation on investments		5,974,140			6,402,062

Total net assets	$	71,646,408		$	73,039,470

Total liabilities and net assets	$	74,302,358		$	75,616,554

Net asset value per share (on 9,786,601 and 9,548,902 shares
outstanding, respectively)	$	7.32		$	7.65

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,			June 30,			June 30,			June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013

Investment income
Interest from portfolio company investments
Non-control/non-affiliate investments	$	26,373		$	-		$	52,225		$	-
Interest and dividends from cash and cash equivalents		602			844			1,314			1,244

Total investment income		26,975			844			53,539			1,244

Operating expenses
Base management fees		368,542			368,882			741,446			735,431
Incentive fees		464,904			266,924			171,586			518,339
Administrative expenses allocated from investment adviser		163,541			162,517			328,304			336,764
Legal and professional fees		24,623			289,485			189,149			485,557
Directors fees		25,000			40,000			50,000			80,000
Stock transfer agent fees		13,052			12,735			25,908			32,057
Custody fees		1,500			1,500			3,000			3,000
Public and investor relations expenses		39,632			2,156			55,799			50,758
Marketing and advertising expenses		11,450			5,416			32,347			10,177
Printing and production expenses		18,154			7,523			27,682			62,726
Postage and fulfillment expenses		13,620			8,060			22,073			31,971
Travel expenses		22,494			20,552			48,054			58,430
General and administrative expenses		64,351			140,560			128,754			222,164

Total operating expenses		1,230,863			1,326,310			1,824,102			2,627,374

Net investment loss		(1,203,888	)		(1,325,466	)		(1,770,563	)		(2,626,130	)

Net realized gain on investments
Non-control/non-affiliate investments		-			3,724,861			1,285,846			3,724,861
Affiliate investments		-			675,317			-			675,317

Total net realized gain on investments		-			4,400,178			1,285,846			4,400,178

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments
Non-control/non-affiliate investments		2,324,516			(2,203,637	)		(427,922	)		(518,560	)
Affiliate investments		-			(861,920	)		-			(1,289,920	)

Total net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments		2,324,516			(3,065,557	)		(427,922	)		(1,808,480	)

Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations	$	1,120,628		$	9,155		$	(912,639	)	$	(34,432	)

Net investment loss per common share outstanding (basic and diluted)	$	(0.12	)	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.18	)	$	(0.29	)

Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations per
common share outstanding (basic and diluted)	$	0.12			*		$	(0.09	)		*

Weighted average common shares outstanding (basic and diluted)		9,669,274			9,086,011			9,609,420			9,125,987

* Per share amounts less than $0.01.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Statements of Changes in Net Assets

(Unaudited)


													Accumulated
													Undistributed
													(Distributions
										Accumulated			in Excess of)			Unrealized
							Treasury			Net			Net Realized			Appreciation
	Common Stock				Additional		Stock			Investment			Gain on			on			Net
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:	Shares (1)		Par Value		Paid-in Capital		At Cost			Income (Loss)			Investments			Investments			Assets

Balance at December 31, 2012 (2)		9,283,781	$	9,284	$	71,675,244	$	(764,179	)	$	(693,699	)	$	-		$	3,186,290		$	73,412,940

Net (decrease) increase in net assets from operations		-		-		-		-			(2,626,130	)		4,400,178			(1,808,480	)		(34,432	)
Distributions to stockholders from net realized gains		-		-		-		-			-			(2,164,145	)		-			(2,164,145	)
Repurchase of common stock (202,559 shares)		-		-		-		(1,305,562	)		-			-			-			(1,305,562	)

Balance at June 30, 2013		9,283,781	$	9,284	$	71,675,244	$	(2,069,741	)	$	(3,319,829	)	$	2,236,033		$	1,377,810		$	69,908,801


Balance at December 31, 2013 (2)		9,997,343	$	9,997	$	71,806,893	$	(2,962,594	)	$	(2,216,888	)	$	-		$	6,402,062		$	73,039,470

Net (decrease) increase in net assets from operations		-		-		-		-			(1,770,563	)		1,285,846			(427,922	)		(912,639	)
Distributions to stockholders		-		-		-		-			-			(1,921,696	)		-			(1,921,696	)
Stock dividend distribution		237,699		238		1,441,035		-			-			-			-			1,441,273

Balance at June 30, 2014		10,235,042	$	10,235	$	73,247,928	$	(2,962,594	)	$	(3,987,451	)	$	(635,850	)	$	5,974,140		$	71,646,408

(1)	Represents common shares issued.
(2)	Net assets at December 31, 2013, and 2012 include no accumulated undistributed net investment income.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)


	Six Months Ended
	June 30,			June 30,
	2014			2013

Cash flows from operating activities
Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations	$	(912,639	)	$	(34,432	)
Adjustments to reconcile net decrease in net assets resulting from
operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Payment-in-kind interest income		(52,225	)		-
Net realized gain on investments		(1,285,846	)		(4,400,178	)
Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments		427,922			1,808,480
Deferred offering costs charged-off		-			287,358
Investments in portfolio companies		(4,386,632	)		-
Net proceeds from sales of portfolio company investments		2,952,508			14,905,420
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets		60,187			56,175
Increase in amounts due to related parties		(97,866	)		-
Decrease in base management fees payable to investment adviser		(4,477	)		(7,851	)
Increase in accrued incentive fees payable to investment adviser		171,586			518,339
Increase in administrative expenses payable to investment adviser		2,602			1,537
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		39,641			(44,016	)
Decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities		(26,414	)		(6,814	)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(3,111,653	)		13,084,018

Cash flows from financing activities
Repurchase of common stock		-			(1,305,562	)
Cash distributions to stockholders		(584,495	)		(2,164,145	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(584,495	)		(3,469,707	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(3,696,148	)		9,614,311

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		13,537,328			8,934,036

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	9,841,180		$	18,548,347

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash operating activities
Conversion of payment-in-kind interest income into preferred stock	$	68,932		$	-

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities
Stock dividend distribution	$	1,441,273		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Schedule of Investments

June 30, 2014

(Unaudited)


			Shares /						Value
			Warrants /						as % of
Portfolio Company	Headquarters / Industry (1)	Type of Investment	Principal		Cost		Value (3)		Net Assets

Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments (4)

Private Portfolio Companies:
Livescribe, Inc.	Oakland, CA	Common Stock		9,686	$	606,187	$	-		0.00	%
	Consumer Electronics

MBA Polymers, Inc.	Worksop, Nottinghamshire, UK	Series G Convertible Preferred Stock		2,000,000		2,000,000		2,090,000		2.92	%
	Plastics Recycling

BrightSource Energy, Inc.	Oakland, CA	Common Stock		132,972		1,756,202		660,000		0.92	%
	Solar Thermal Energy	Series 1A Preferred Stock		2,294,835		682,761		360,000		0.50	%
		Series 1 Convertible Preferred Stock		48,582		458,168		390,000		0.54	%
		Subordinated Convertible Bridge Notes (2) (9)	$	225,604		225,604		225,604		0.31	%
		Original principal $205,193; PIK interest 11.5%;
		mature 7/10/2014 (extended to 8/10/2014 by
		amendment dated as of 7/10/2014)

Harvest Power, Inc.	Waltham, MA	Series B Convertible Preferred Stock		580,496		2,499,999		1,850,000		2.58	%
	Waste Management

Suniva, Inc.	Norcross, GA	Series D Convertible Preferred Stock		198		2,500,007		1,400,000		1.95	%
	Solar Photovoltaic Cells	Series F Convertible Preferred Stock		10		54,280		150,000		0.21	%

Xtime, Inc.	Redwood Shores, CA	Series 1A Convertible Preferred Stock		1,573,234		2,389,140		5,170,000		7.22	%
	Software as a Service	Common Stock Warrants		n/a		610,860		1,460,000		2.04	%
		Exercise price $0.01 per share; perpetual term
		Subject to restrictions on exercisability
		Common Stock Warrants		22,581		-		20,000		0.03	%
		Exercise price $0.01 per share; expire 8/24/2018
		Subject to restrictions on exercisability

Kabam, Inc.	San Francisco, CA	Series D Convertible Preferred Stock		1,046,017		1,328,860		1,930,000		2.69	%
	Online Multiplayer Games

Agilyx Corporation	Beaverton, OR	Series C Convertible Preferred Stock		1,092,956		4,000,000		1,000,000		1.40	%
	Renewable Oils	Subordinated Secured Convertible Bridge Notes (2) (9)	$	332,615		332,615		550,000		0.77	%
		Original principal $332,356; PIK interest 0.3%;
		mature 7/31/2015

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Schedule of Investments

June 30, 2014

(Unaudited)



			Shares /					Value
			Warrants /					as % of
Portfolio Company	Headquarters / Industry (1)	Type of Investment	Principal		Cost		Value (3)	Net Assets

Zoosk, Inc.	San Francisco, CA	Series E Convertible Preferred Stock	715,171		2,999,999		4,480,000	6.25	%
	Online Dating

SilkRoad, Inc.	Chicago, IL	Series D-1 Convertible Preferred Stock	5,409,572		1,068,932		1,450,000	2.02	%
	Software as a Service	Series D-2 Convertible Preferred Stock	13,449,995		3,515,000		4,871,790	6.80	%
		Class B Common Stock	6,138,057		1,485,000		2,058,210	2.87	%
		Series D-1 Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants	1,683,460		-		290,000	0.40	%
		Exercise price $0.2823 per share; expire 6/30/2018
		(subject to adjustment)

Mode Media Corporation (4)	Brisbane, CA	Series F Convertible Preferred Stock	1,196,315		4,999,999		5,750,000	8.03	%
	Social Media

Stoke, Inc.	Santa Clara, CA	Series F Convertible Preferred Stock	645,259		3,012,095		1,770,000	2.47	%
	Communications Equipment	Series F Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants	322,629		1,487,902		880,000	1.23	%
		Exercise price $0.01 per share; expire 4/29/2019

Deem, Inc.	San Francisco, CA	Series AA-1 Convertible Preferred Stock	59,469,532		3,000,000		4,440,000	6.20	%
	E-commerce network

Centrify Corporation	Santa Clara, CA	Series E Convertible Preferred Stock	1,084,873		2,999,999		2,999,999	4.19	%
	Enterprise software

Subtotal - Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments, Private Portfolio Companies				$	44,013,609	$	46,245,603	64.54	%


Publicly Traded Portfolio Companies:
Tremor Video, Inc. (5)	New York, NY	Common Stock	599,999		4,000,001		2,831,995	3.95	%
	Online Video Advertising

TrueCar, Inc. (6)	Santa Monica, CA	Common Stock	377,358		2,999,996		5,019,616	7.01	%
	Consumer Website

Millennial Media, Inc. (7)	Baltimore, MD	Common Stock	831,929		3,333,332		4,083,864	5.70	%
	Mobile Advertising

Subtotal - Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments, Publicly Traded Portfolio Companies				$	10,333,329	$	11,935,475	16.66	%

Affiliate Investments (8)

Private Portfolio Companies:
Metabolon, Inc.	Durham, NC	Series D Convertible Preferred Stock	2,229,021		4,000,000		6,140,000	8.57	%
	Molecular Diagnostics and Services

Subtotal - Affiliate Investments, Private Portfolio Companies				$	4,000,000	$	6,140,000	8.57	%

Total - Investments in Portfolio Company Securities (10)				$	58,346,938	$	64,321,078	89.77	%

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Schedule of Investments

June 30, 2014

(Unaudited)


				% of
Reconciliation to Net Assets	Amount			Net Assets



Investments in portfolio company securities at fair value	$	64,321,078			89.77	%
Cash and cash equivalents - includes investment in money market funds consisting of 9,529,354 Class A shares in the SEI Daily Income Trust Government Fund (SEOXX)		9,841,180			13.74	%
with a value of $1 per share, or $9,529,354, which is income producing (2)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		42,234			0.06	%
Due from related parties		97,866			0.14	%

Less: Total Liabilities		(2,655,950	)		(3.71	%)

Net Assets	$	71,646,408			100.00	%


*	Percentages less than 0.01%

(1)	The Company invests in later stage, typically venture capital-backed, technology companies. The corporate headquarters of the portfolio company may not be indicative of the primary source of the portfolio company’s business. The industry description generally identifies the types of products or services provided by each portfolio company.

(2)	Investment is income producing.

(3)	Except for the shares of common stock of Tremor Video and 696,735 shares of common stock of Millennial Media, all investments were valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors and are subject to legal restrictions on transfer (including lockup and other contractual restrictions) as of June 30, 2014.

(4)	Glam Media, Inc. has changed its name to Mode Media Corporation.

(5)	On June 26, 2013, Tremor Video priced its initial public offering 7,500,000 shares of common stock at a price to the public of $10.00 per share. Tremor Video's common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol "TRMR." The Company's shares in Tremor Video were subject to a lockup agreement which expired on December 24, 2013. At June 30, 2014, the Company valued its shares of common stock in Tremor Video based on the June 30, 2014 closing price.

(6)	On May 15, 2014, TrueCar priced its initial public offering of 7,775,000 shares of common stock at a price to the public of $9.00 per share. The shares began trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker symbol "TRUE" on May 16, 2014. Prior to the IPO, TrueCar completed a two-for-three reverse stock split, and the TrueCar shares are reflected on a split-adjusted basis. The Company's shares in TrueCar are subject to a lockup agreement which expires on or about November 11, 2014.

(7)	On November 6, 2013, portfolio company Jumptap, Inc. completed its merger with Millennial Media, Inc. (NYSE: MM). At the closing of the merger, in exchange for its Jumptap Series G preferred stock and after certain share adjustments, the Company received 1,247,893 shares of Millennial Media’s common stock, which shares are restricted securities. Pursuant to a contractual lockup agreement, the Company could not sell any shares of Millennial Media common stock for the initial 90-day period following the closing. Beginning on February 5, 2014, the lockup restriction on 415,964 shares expired, and all of these shares were sold in the first quarter of 2014. Beginning on May 6, 2014, an additional 696,735 shares were released from any lockup restrictions and, at June 30, 2014, the Company valued these shares of common stock based on the June 30, 2014 closing price. At the closing of the merger, the Company was required to set aside in escrow a total of 135,194 shares of Millennial Media for a one-year period following the closing as partial security for potential stockholder indemnification obligations and, at June 30, 2014, the Company valued these shares based on the June 30, 2014 closing price, adjusted for a discount due to lack of marketability of 10%.

(8)	Control Investments are defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"), as investments in which the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or where the Company has the ability to nominate greater than 50% of the board representation. Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the voting securities. Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliate Investments.

(9)	Investment is payment-in-kind note. Principal and cost includes accumulated payment-in-kind ("PIK") interest. PIK interest rate is fixed for the term of the notes. The PIK interest is computed at the contractual rate specified in each note and is added to the principal balance of the note and recorded as interest income as earned. As of June 30, 2014, the Company was accruing PIK interest on each of its payment-in-kind notes, and none of such notes were on non-accrual status.

(10)	As of June 30, 2014, approximately 97% of the Company's total assets constituted qualifying investments under Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act. Qualifying assets must represent at least 70% of the Company's total assets at the time of acquisition of any additional non-qualifying assets.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Schedule of Investments

December 31, 2013

(Unaudited)


			Shares /						Value
			Warrants /						as % of
Portfolio Company	Headquarters / Industry (1)	Type of Investment	Principal		Cost		Value (3)		Net Assets

Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments (4)

Private Portfolio Companies:
Livescribe, Inc.	Oakland, CA	Common Stock		9,686	$	606,187	$	-		0.00	%
	Consumer Electronics

MBA Polymers, Inc.	Worksop, Nottinghamshire, UK	Series G Convertible Preferred Stock		2,000,000		2,000,000		1,530,000		2.09	%
	Plastics Recycling

BrightSource Energy, Inc.	Oakland, CA	Common Stock		132,972		1,756,202		710,000		0.97	%
	Solar Thermal Energy	Series 1A Preferred Stock		2,294,835		682,761		380,000		0.52	%
	Solar Thermal Energy	Series 1 Convertible Preferred Stock		48,582		458,168		390,000		0.53	%
	Solar Thermal Energy	Subordinated Convertible Bridge Notes (2) (7)	$	213,902		213,902		213,902		0.29	%
		Original principal $205,193; PIK interest 11.5%;
		mature 7/10/2014

Harvest Power, Inc.	Waltham, MA	Series B Convertible Preferred Stock		580,496		2,499,999		2,770,000		3.79	%
	Waste Management

Suniva, Inc.	Norcross, GA	Series D Convertible Preferred Stock		198		2,500,007		1,330,000		1.82	%
	Solar Photovoltaic Cells

Xtime, Inc.	Redwood Shores, CA	Series 1A Convertible Preferred Stock		1,573,234		2,389,140		4,460,000		6.11	%
	Software as a Service	Common Stock Warrants		n/a		610,860		1,350,000		1.85	%
		Exercise price $0.01 per share; perpetual term
		Subject to restrictions on exercisability
	Software as a Service	Common Stock Warrants		22,581		-		20,000		0.03	%
		Exercise price $0.01 per share; expire 8/24/2018
		Subject to restrictions on exercisability

Kabam, Inc.	San Francisco, CA	Series D Convertible Preferred Stock		1,046,017		1,328,860		1,620,000		2.22	%
	Online Multiplayer Games

TrueCar, Inc.	Santa Monica, CA	Common Stock		566,037		2,999,996		3,720,000		5.09	%
	Consumer Website

Agilyx Corporation	Beaverton, OR	Series C Convertible Preferred Stock		1,092,956		4,000,000		1,840,000		2.52	%
	Renewable Oils

Zoosk, Inc.	San Francisco, CA	Series E Convertible Preferred Stock		715,171		2,999,999		5,650,000		7.74	%
	Online Dating

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Schedule of Investments

December 31, 2013

(Unaudited)


				Shares /					Value
				Warrants /					as % of
Portfolio Company	Headquarters / Industry (1)	Type of Investment		Principal		Cost		Value (3)	Net Assets

SilkRoad, Inc.	Chicago, IL	Series C Convertible Preferred Stock		17,711,654		5,000,000		7,350,000	10.06	%
	Software as a Service	Preferred Stock Warrants		n/a		-		230,000	0.31	%
		Exercise price $0.2823 per share (subject to
		adjustment); expire 6/30/2018
		Subject to restrictions on exercisability
	Software as a Service	Subordinated Convertible Bridge Note (2) (7)	$	1,028,667		1,028,667		1,028,667	1.41	%
		Original principal $1,000,000; PIK interest 8%;
		matures 6/30/2014 (subject to certain conditions
		and events)

Glam Media, Inc.	Brisbane, CA	Series F Convertible Preferred Stock		1,196,315		4,999,999		5,750,000	7.87	%
	Social Media

Stoke, Inc.	Santa Clara, CA	Common Stock		1,000,000		3,500,000		940,000	1.29	%
	Communications Equipment

Deem, Inc.	San Francisco, CA	Series AA-1 Convertible Preferred Stock		59,469,532		3,000,000		3,000,000	4.11	%
	E-commerce network

Subtotal - Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments, Private Portfolio Companies					$	42,574,747	$	44,282,569	60.62	%


Publicly Traded Portfolio Companies:
Tremor Video, Inc. (4)	New York, NY	Common Stock		599,999		4,000,001		3,479,994	4.76	%
	Online Video Advertising

Millennial Media, Inc. (5)	Baltimore, MD	Common Stock		1,247,893		4,999,995		8,074,242	11.06	%
	Mobile Advertising

Subtotal - Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments, Publicly Traded Portfolio Companies					$	8,999,996	$	11,554,236	15.82	%


Affiliate Investments (6)

Private Portfolio Companies:
Metabolon, Inc.	Durham, NC	Series D Convertible Preferred Stock		2,229,021		4,000,000		6,140,000	8.41	%
	Molecular Diagnostics and Services

Subtotal - Affiliate Investments, Private Portfolio Companies					$	4,000,000	$	6,140,000	8.41	%

Total - Investments in Portfolio Company Securities (8)					$	55,574,743	$	61,976,805	84.85	%

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Schedule of Investments

December 31, 2013

(Unaudited)


				% of
Reconciliation to Net Assets	Amount			Net Assets



Investments in portfolio company securities at fair value	$	61,976,805			84.85	%
Cash and cash equivalents - includes investment in money market funds consisting of 13,371,266 Class A shares in the SEI Daily Income Trust Government Fund (SEOXX)		13,537,328			18.54	%
with a value of $1 per share, or $13,371,266, which is income producing (2)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		102,421			0.14	%

Less: Total Liabilities		(2,577,084	)		(3.53	%)

Net Assets	$	73,039,470			100.00	%


(1)	The Company invests in later stage, typically venture capital-backed, technology companies. The corporate headquarters of the portfolio company may not be indicative of the primary source of the portfolio company’s business. The industry description generally identifies the types of products or services provided by each portfolio company.

(2)	Investment is income producing.

(3)	Except for common stock in one publicly traded portfolio company, Tremor Video, all investments were valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors and are subject to legal restrictions on transfer (including lockup and other contractual restrictions) as of December 31, 2013.

(4)	On June 26, 2013, Tremor Video priced its initial public offering 7,500,000 shares of common stock at a price to the public of $10.00 per share. Tremor Video's common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol "TRMR." The Company's shares in Tremor Video were subject to a lockup agreement which expired on December 24, 2013. At December 31, 2013, the Company valued its shares of common stock in Tremor Video based on the December 31, 2013 closing price.

(5)	On November 6, 2013, portfolio company Jumptap, Inc. completed its merger with Millennial Media, Inc. (NYSE: MM). At the closing of the merger, in exchange for its Jumptap Series G preferred stock and after certain share adjustments, the Company received 1,247,893 shares of Millennial Media’s common stock, which shares are restricted securities. Millennial Media is required to register these shares for resale in accordance with a registration rights agreement. Pursuant to a contractual lockup agreement, the Company may not sell any shares of Millennial Media common stock for the initial 90-day period following the closing. Beginning on or about February 4, 2014, the Company may sell up to 415,964 shares. Beginning on or about May 5, 2014, the Company may sell an additional 696,735 shares. At the closing of the merger, the Company was required to set aside in escrow a total of 135,194 shares of Millennial Media for a one-year period following the closing as partial security for potential stockholder indemnification obligations. At December 31, 2013, the Company valued its shares of common stock in Millennial Media based on the December 31, 2013 closing price, adjusted for a discount due to lack of marketability of 11%.

(6)	Control Investments are defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"), as investments in which the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or where the Company has the ability to nominate greater than 50% of the board representation. Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the voting securities. Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliate Investments.

(7)	Investment is payment-in-kind note. Principal and cost includes accumulated payment-in-kind ("PIK") interest. PIK interest rate is fixed for the term of the notes. The PIK interest is computed at the contractual rate specified in each note and is added to the principal balance of the note and recorded as interest income as earned. As of December 31, 2013, the Company was accruing PIK interest on each of its payment-in-kind notes, and none of such notes were on non-accrual status.

(8)	As of December 31, 2013, approximately 97.8% of the Company's total assets constituted qualifying investments under Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act. Qualifying assets must represent at least 70% of the Company's total assets at the time of acquisition of any additional non-qualifying assets.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1.	Description of Business

Keating Capital, Inc. (“Keating Capital” or the “Company”) was incorporated on May 9, 2008 under the laws of the State of Maryland and is an externally managed, non-diversified, closed-end management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as of November 20, 2008. The Company commenced its portfolio company investment activities in January 2010. The shares of the Company's common stock have been listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market since December 12, 2011.

The Company’s investment objective is to maximize capital appreciation. The Company seeks to accomplish its capital appreciation objective by making investments in the equity securities of later stage, typically venture capital-backed, pre-initial public offering (“pre-IPO”) companies that are committed to and capable of becoming public. The Company generally acquires equity securities, including preferred stock that is convertible into common stock, common stock, and warrants exercisable into common or preferred stock. The Company may also invest in debt securities, including convertible bridge notes, issued by a portfolio company typically seeking to raise capital to fund their operations until an IPO, sale or next equity financing event. The Company’s investments are made principally through direct investments in prospective portfolio companies. However, the Company may also purchase equity securities in private secondary transactions from current or former management or early stage investors in private companies that meet its investment criteria.

Keating Investments, LLC (“Keating Investments”), or the “investment adviser,” serves as the Company’s external investment adviser and also provides the Company with administrative services necessary for it to operate. In this capacity, Keating Investments is primarily responsible for the selection, evaluation, structure, valuation and administration of the Company’s investment portfolio, subject to the supervision of the Company’s Board of Directors. Keating Investments is a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended.

In connection with the sale of 100% of the issued and outstanding equity interests of the investment adviser by its members to BDCA Adviser, LLC (“BDCA Adviser”) on July 1, 2014 (the “Transaction”), the Company changed its name to BDCA Venture, Inc., and the investment adviser changed its name to BDCA Venture Adviser, LLC. See Note 13 - Subsequent Events.

2.	Basis of Presentation; Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The interim financial statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, all of which were of a normal recurring nature, considered necessary for the fair presentation of financial statements for the interim period, have been included. The results of operations for the current period are not necessarily indicative of results that ultimately may be achieved for any other interim period or for the year ending December 31, 2014. The interim unaudited financial statements and notes hereto should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Consolidation

Under the 1940 Act rules and Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, “Financial Services – Investment Companies,” (“ASC 946”), the Company is precluded from consolidating any entity other than another investment company or an operating company that provides substantially all of its services and benefits to the Company. The Company’s financial statements include only the accounts of Keating Capital as the Company has no subsidiaries.

Reclassifications

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company separately classified marketing and advertising expenses as an individual line item in its Statement of Operations. Marketing and advertising expenses were previously included as a component of general and administrative expenses. For comparative purposes, this line item has been separately classified in the Statement of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

In the Company’s Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2014, the items comprising cash flows from investment activities have been included in the cash flows from operating activities. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the items comprising cash flows from investment activities were presented in cash flows from investing activities, separately from the cash flows from operating activities. For comparative purposes, the items comprising cash flows from investment activities have been included in the cash flows from operating activities in the Statement of Cash Flows for six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reported period. Such estimates and judgments could change in the future as more information becomes known, and actual results could differ from these estimates and the differences could be material. The Company considers its significant estimates to include the fair value of investments in portfolio company securities (see “Valuation of Investments”) and income taxes (see “Income Taxes”).

Valuation of Investments

Investments are stated at value as defined under the 1940 Act, in accordance with the applicable regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures,” (“ASC 820”). Value, as defined in Section 2(a)(41) of the 1940 Act, is: (i) the market price for those securities for which a market quotation is readily available, and (ii) the fair value as determined in good faith by, or under the direction of, the Board of Directors for all other assets. See Note 3 - Portfolio Investments and Fair Value. The 1940 Act requires periodic valuation of each investment in the Company’s portfolio to determine the Company’s net asset value. Under the 1940 Act, unrestricted securities with readily available market quotations are to be valued at the closing market price on the valuation date; all other assets must be valued at fair value as determined in good faith by or under the direction of the Board of Directors.

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, approximately 78.1% and 77.4%, respectively, of the Company’s gross assets represented investments in portfolio companies that are valued at fair value by the Board of Directors. The Company makes investments in later stage, typically venture capital-backed, private, pre-IPO companies. Given the nature of investing in the securities of private companies, the Company’s investments are generally considered Level 3 assets under ASC 820 until these portfolio companies become public and begin trading on a stock exchange and the securities are no longer subject to any post-IPO lockup restrictions. As such, the Company values all of its investments, other than unrestricted securities in publicly traded portfolio companies, at fair value as determined in good faith by the Company’s Board of Directors, pursuant to a consistent valuation policy in accordance with the provisions of ASC 820 and the 1940 Act.

Determination of fair values involves subjective judgments and estimates. Due to the inherent uncertainty in determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of the Company’s investments determined in good faith by its Board of Directors may differ significantly from the value that would have been used had a ready market existed for such investments, and the differences could be material. Changes in valuation of these equity securities are recorded in the Company’s Statement of Operations as “Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments.”

At the Company’s regular quarterly meeting of the Board of Directors held on July 24, 2014, the Company dissolved the Valuation Committee effective July 25, 2014 and appointed a lead valuation director, who is an independent member of the Board of the Directors, to act as the liaison between the Board of Directors, the Company’s management and the investment adviser. With respect to investments for which market quotations are not readily available, the Company’s Board of Directors undertakes a multi-step valuation process each quarter, as described below:

	●	The Company’s quarterly valuation process begins with each portfolio company investment being initially valued by Keating Investments’ senior investment professionals responsible for the portfolio investment.

	●	The Company’s lead valuation director in consultation with the Company’s management, will determine each calendar quarter which investments, if any, in the Company’s portfolio for which market quotations are not readily available will be reviewed by a third-party valuation firm. The selection of a private portfolio company for periodic valuation review will be made in view of all facts and circumstances. However, there is no requirement that a particular portfolio company have its valuation reviewed by a third-party valuation firm in any specified time interval.

	●	The Company’s lead valuation director reviews the preliminary valuations, and the Company’s investment adviser and the third-party valuation firm, if used, respond and supplement the preliminary valuation to reflect any comments provided by the lead valuation director.

	●	The Company’s Board of Directors discusses the valuations and determines, in good faith, the fair value of each investment in the Company’s portfolio for which market quotations are not readily available based on the input of the Company’s investment adviser, the third-party valuation firm, if used, and the Company’s lead valuation director.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). In accordance with ASC 820, the Company uses a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

	●	Level 1: Observable inputs such as unadjusted quoted prices in active markets;

	●	Level 2: Includes inputs such as quoted prices for similar securities in active markets and quoted prices for identical securities where there is little or no activity in the market; and

	●	Level 3: Unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.

In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

The Company applies the framework for determining fair value as described above to the valuation of investments in each of the following categories:

Equity Investments

Equity investments for which market quotations are readily available in an active market are generally valued at the most recently available closing market prices and are classified as Level 1 assets. However, equity investments for which market quotations are readily available, but which are subject to lockup provisions restricting the resale of such investments for a specified period of time, are valued at a discount to the most recently available closing market prices and, accordingly, are classified as Level 3 assets.

The fair values of the Company’s equity investments for which market quotations are not readily available (including investments in convertible preferred stock) are determined based on various factors and are classified as Level 3 assets. To determine the fair value of a portfolio company for which market quotations are not readily available, the Company may analyze the portfolio company’s most recently available historical and projected financial results, public market comparables, and other factors. The Company may also consider other events, including the transaction in which the Company acquired its securities, subsequent equity sales by the portfolio company, mergers or acquisitions affecting the portfolio company, or the completion of an IPO by the portfolio company. In addition, the Company may consider the trends of the portfolio company’s basic financial metrics from the time of its original investment until the measurement date, with material improvement of these metrics indicating a possible increase in fair value, while material deterioration of these metrics may indicate a possible reduction in fair value. The fair values of the Company’s portfolio company securities are generally discounted for lack of marketability or when the securities are illiquid, such as when there are restrictions on resale or the lack of an established trading market which will generally be the case for pre-IPO companies, as well as during any lockup period to which the Company is subject with respect to public companies in its portfolio. See Note 3 - Portfolio Investments and Fair Value.

In cases where a portfolio company completes a subsequent financing with different rights and/or preferences than the equity securities the Company holds, or where the Company owns common stock in a portfolio company with preferred stock outstanding, or where a merger or acquisition event involving a portfolio company has been completed or is pending, the Company may also consider using option pricing models and/or a backsolve approach to derive the transaction value or marketable equity value, as the case may be.

The fair value of common stock warrants is generally determined by using option pricing models, such as the Black-Scholes model or, in cases of certain warrants where the Company’s ability to exercise may be contingent or be subject to certain metrics, a Monte Carlo simulation.

Debt Investments

Given the nature of the Company’s investments in debt investments, historically convertible bridge notes issued by venture capital-backed portfolio companies, these investments are Level 3 assets under ASC 820 because there is no known or accessible market or market indexes for these investment securities to be traded or exchanged. Since the Company invests in convertible bridge notes for the primary purpose of potential conversion into equity at a future date, the fair value of the Company’s convertible debt investments for which market quotations are not available is determined on an as-converted to equity basis using the same factors the Company uses to value its equity investments (including convertible preferred stock), as discussed above. In making a good faith determination of the value of its convertible debt investments, the Company generally starts with the cost basis of the investment, which includes the value attributed to the original issue discount (“OID”), if any, and payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest which has been accreted to principal as earned.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

If the Company determines that there is a low likelihood that its convertible debt investments will be converted into equity or repaid in connection with an IPO, sale or next equity financing event, or will otherwise be held for cash payment at maturity, or in the case of non-convertible debt investments, the Company applies a procedure that assumes a sale of the investment in a hypothetical market to a hypothetical market participant where buyers and sellers are willing participants. The hypothetical market does not include scenarios where the underlying security was simply repaid or extinguished, but includes an exit concept. As part of this process, the Company will evaluate the creditworthiness of the portfolio company, its ability to meet its current debt obligations, the collateral (if any) for recoverability of the debt investment in the event of default, and whether the security lien, if any, is subordinated to senior lenders. The Company will also use pricing of recently issued comparable debt securities, if available, to determine the baseline hypothetical market yield as of the measurement date. The Company considers each portfolio company’s credit rating, if any, security liens and other characteristics of the investment to adjust the baseline yield to derive a hypothetical yield for each debt investment as of the measurement date. The anticipated future cash flows from each debt investment are then discounted at the hypothetical yield to estimate each investment’s fair value as of the measurement date.

The Company’s process includes, among other things, an assessment of the underlying investment performance, the current portfolio company’s financial condition and market changing events that impact valuation, estimated remaining life, current market yield and interest rate spreads of similar securities as of the measurement date. If there is a significant deterioration of the credit worthiness of the debtor, the Company may consider other factors than those a hypothetical market participant would use to estimate fair value, including the proceeds that would be received in a liquidation analysis.

When acquiring a debt instrument, the Company may receive warrants or other equity-related securities from the borrower in connection with the debt investment. The Company determines the cost basis of the warrants or other equity-related securities received based upon their respective fair values on the date of receipt in proportion to the total fair value of the debt and warrants or other equity-related securities received. Any resulting discount on the loan from recordation of the warrant or other equity instruments is accreted into interest income over the life of the loan.

Valuation of Financial Instruments

The Company believes that the carrying amounts of its financial instruments, consisting of cash and cash equivalents (including money market funds), receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate the fair values of such items due to the short maturity of such instruments.

Portfolio Company Investment Classification

The Company classifies its portfolio company investments in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, “Control Investments” are defined as investments in which the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or has rights to nominate greater than 50% of the board representation. Under the 1940 Act, “Affiliate Investments” are defined as investments in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the voting securities. Under the 1940 Act, “Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments” are defined as investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliate Investments.

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had one portfolio company investment, Metabolon, Inc. (“Metabolon”), which was an Affiliate Investment, and no Control Investments. No interest or dividend income was derived from this Affiliate Investment since it was a non-incoming producing equity investment.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents are composed of demand deposits with original maturities of 90 days or less, when acquired, and investments in money market funds. The Company primarily invests its cash on hand in money market funds that invest primarily in U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. Government agency securities, and repurchase agreements fully collateralized by such securities. Cash needed to fund the Company’s near-term operating expenses is held in a bank depository account.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company may place its cash and cash equivalents with various financial institutions and, at times, cash held in depository accounts at such institutions may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limit. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Securities Transactions

Securities transactions are accounted for on the date the transaction for the purchase or sale of the securities is entered into by the Company (i.e., trade date). Securities transactions outside conventional channels, such as private transactions, are recorded as of the date the Company obtains the right to demand the securities purchased or to collect the proceeds from a sale, and incurs an obligation to pay for securities purchased or to deliver securities sold, respectively. Cash due from brokers related to sales of securities that had not settled as of the balance sheet date is classified as receivable for investments sold. Commissions and other costs associated with transactions involving securities, including legal costs, are included in the cost basis of purchases and deducted from the proceeds of sales.

Interest and Dividend Income

Interest income from certificates of deposit and other short-term investments is recorded on an accrual basis to the extent such amounts are expected to be collected, and accrued interest income is evaluated periodically for collectability. PIK interest represents contractually deferred interest computed at a contractual rate specified in the loan agreement. PIK interest may be prepaid by either contract or the portfolio company’s election, but generally is paid at the end of the loan term. PIK interest is added to the principal balance of the loan, and is generally recorded as interest income on an accrual basis to the extent such PIK interest is expected to be collected. The Company recorded PIK interest income of $26,373 and $52,225 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. The Company had no PIK interest income during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013. See “Income Taxes” below.

When one of the Company’s loans becomes more than 90 days past due, or if the Company otherwise does not expect the portfolio company to be able to service its debt and other obligations, the Company will, as a general matter, place the loan on non-accrual status and generally will cease recognizing interest income on that loan until all principal and interest has been brought current through payment or due to a restructuring such that the interest income is deemed to be collectible. However, the Company may make exceptions to this policy if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection. If the fair value of a loan is below cost, the Company may cease recognizing PIK interest on the debt investment until such time that the fair value equals or exceeds cost.

The Company’s preferred equity investments may pay fixed or adjustable rate, non-cumulative dividends and will generally have a “preference” over common equity in the payment of non-cumulative dividends and the liquidation of a portfolio company's assets. In order to be payable, non-cumulative distributions on such preferred equity must be declared by the portfolio company's board of directors. Non-cumulative dividend income from preferred equity investments in portfolio companies is recorded when such dividends are declared or at the point an obligation exists for a portfolio company to make a distribution. In limited instances, the Company’s preferred equity investments may include cumulative dividend provisions, where such cumulative dividends, whether or not declared, accrue at a specified rate from the original investment date, have a “preference” over other classes of preferred equity and common equity with respect to payment, and are payable only when declared by a portfolio company’s board of directors or upon a qualifying liquidation event. Cumulative dividends are recorded when such dividends are declared by the portfolio company’s board of directors, or when a specified event occurs triggering an obligation to pay such dividends. When recorded, cumulative dividends are added to the balance of the preferred equity investment and are recorded as dividend income in the statement of operations. Since no dividends have been declared or paid, or are expected to be declared or paid, with respect to the Company’s convertible preferred stock investments, these investments are considered to be non-income producing. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, there were no non-cumulative or cumulative dividends recorded.

Realized Gain or Loss and Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation of Portfolio Investments

Realized gain or loss is recognized when an investment is disposed of and is computed as the difference between the Company's cost basis in the investment at the disposition date and the net proceeds received from such disposition (after reduction for commissions and other selling expenses). Realized gains and losses on investment transactions are determined by specific identification. Unrealized appreciation or depreciation is computed as the difference between the fair value of the investment and the cost basis of such investment.

Income Taxes

Effective January 1, 2010, the Company elected to be treated for tax purposes as a RIC under the Code. The Company intends to operate so as to qualify as a RIC. To maintain RIC tax treatment, the Company must meet specified source-of-income and asset diversification requirements and distribute annually at least 90% of its investment company taxable income. To maintain the Company’s status as a RIC, PIK interest, which is a non-cash source of income, must generally be distributed to stockholders at least annually from other sources such as available cash or the proceeds from the disposition of investments. However, since the Company does not expect to have investment company taxable income, the Company would generally not be required to distribute PIK interest from its available cash or the proceeds from the disposition of investments.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

As a RIC, the Company generally will not have to pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any investment company taxable income (which is generally the Company’s net ordinary income plus the excess, if any, of realized net short-term capital gains over realized net long-term capital losses) or any realized net capital gains (which is generally net realized long-term capital gains in excess of net realized short-term capital losses) that the Company distributes to its stockholders as dividends. Taxable income generally differs from net income for financial reporting purposes due to temporary and permanent differences in the recognition of income and expenses. In addition, taxable income generally excludes any unrealized appreciation or depreciation in the Company’s portfolio company investments, because gains and losses are not included in taxable income until they are realized and required to be recognized.

The Company is not required to distribute its realized net capital gains, if any, to stockholders to maintain RIC tax treatment. However, the Company generally will have to pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any realized net capital gains that the Company does not distribute to its stockholders. In the event the Company retains any of its realized net capital gains, including amounts retained to pay incentive fees to the investment adviser, the Company may designate the retained amount as a deemed distribution to stockholders and will be required to pay corporate-level tax on the retained amount.

The Company would also be subject to certain excise taxes imposed on RICs if it fails to distribute during each calendar year an amount at least equal to the sum of: (i) 98% of its ordinary income for the calendar year, (ii) 98.2% of its capital gains in excess of capital losses for the calendar year, and (iii) any ordinary income and net capital gains for preceding years that were not distributed during such years. The Company will not be subject to this excise tax on amounts on which the Company is required to pay corporate income tax (such as retained realized net capital gains).

Because federal income tax regulations differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, distributions from net realized gains for financial reporting purposes may include short-term capital gains which are included in ordinary income for tax purposes.

The Company evaluates tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing its tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions deemed to meet a “more-likely-than-not” threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the applicable period. Although the Company files federal and state tax returns, its major tax jurisdiction is federal. The 2011, 2012 and 2013 federal tax years for the Company remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. The 2011, 2012 and 2013 state tax years for the Company remain subject to examination by the Colorado Department of Revenue.

As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had not recorded a liability for any unrecognized tax positions. Management’s evaluation of uncertain tax positions may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based upon factors including, but not limited to, an on-going analysis of tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof. The Company’s policy is to include interest and penalties related to income taxes, if applicable, in general and administrative expenses. There were no such expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

The Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “RIC Act”) modernized several of the federal income and excise tax provisions related to RICs. Under the RIC Act, capital losses incurred during the Company’s 2011 taxable year and after may be carried forward indefinitely with the character of the original loss retained. Prior to the RIC Act, capital losses could be carried forward for eight years, and were carried forward as short-term capital losses regardless of the character of the original loss. The RIC Act also contains simplification provisions, which are aimed at preventing disqualification of a RIC for inadvertent failures to comply with asset diversification and/or qualifying income tests.

Dividends and Distributions

Dividends and distributions to common stockholders must be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors and any dividend payable is recorded on the ex-dividend date.

Per Share Information

Net changes in net assets resulting from operations per common share, or basic earnings per share, are calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period presented. Diluted earnings per share are not presented as there are no potentially dilutive securities outstanding.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Capital Accounts

Certain capital accounts including undistributed net investment income or loss, accumulated net realized gain or loss, net unrealized appreciation or depreciation, and paid-in capital in excess of par, are adjusted, at least annually, for permanent differences between book and tax. In addition, the character of income and gains to be distributed is determined in accordance with income tax regulations that may differ from GAAP. GAAP requires that certain components of net assets relating to permanent differences are to be reclassified between financial statement reporting and tax reporting. These reclassifications have no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share and are intended to enable the Company’s stockholders to determine the amount of accumulated and undistributed earnings they potentially could receive in the future and on which they could be taxed.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) or other standards setting bodies that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, the Company believes that the impact of recently issued standards that are not yet effective will not have a material impact on its financial statements upon adoption.

3.	Portfolio Investments and Fair Value

The Company’s investments in portfolio companies consist of securities issued by private and publicly traded companies consisting of convertible preferred stock, common stock, subordinated convertible bridge notes, and warrants to purchase common and preferred stock. Investment activity during the three months ended June 30, 2014 included the following:

	●	The Company invested a total of $199,414 in the second and third tranche closings of subordinated convertible bridge notes of an existing portfolio company, Agilyx Corporation (“Agilyx”).

	●	The Company invested $999,997 in the Series F convertible preferred stock financing of Stoke, Inc. (“Stoke”), an existing portfolio company. In connection with this financing, the Company exchanged all of the shares of common stock that it held in Stoke for shares of Series F convertible preferred stock. The Company also received warrants to purchase shares of Series F convertible preferred stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share.

	●	The Company invested $2,999,999 in the Series E convertible preferred stock financing of Centrify Corporation (“Centrify”), a new portfolio company.

	●	The Company invested $54,280 in the Series F convertible preferred stock financing of Suniva, Inc. (“Suniva”), an existing portfolio company.

	●	In connection with the initial closing of the Series D financing of SilkRoad, Inc. (“SilkRoad”), the Company received shares of Series D-1 convertible preferred stock upon the automatic conversion of the $1,000,000 convertible bridge note that it held in SilkRoad, including PIK interest which was also converted. As part of the initial closing of this financing, the Company also received warrants to purchase Series D-1 convertible preferred stock replacing the warrants issued to the Company in the convertible bridge note financing. Further, as part of the initial closing of the Series D financing, the Company received shares of Series D-2 convertible stock and Class B Common in exchange for the shares of Series C convertible preferred stock held by the Company. See Note 13 – Subsequent Events.

During the three months ended June 30, 2014, an additional 696,735 shares of Millennial Media, Inc. (“Millennial”) were released from contractual lockup restriction and, at June 30, 2014, the Company continued to hold these shares. The Company was required to set aside in escrow a total of 135,194 shares of Millennial Media for a one-year period following the closing of the merger as partial security for potential stockholder indemnification obligations.

During the three months ended June 30, 2014, TrueCar, Inc. (TrueCar”) priced its initial public offering of 7,775,000 shares of common stock at a price to the public of $9.00 per share. The shares began trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker symbol "TRUE" on May 16, 2014. Prior to the IPO, TrueCar completed a two-for-three reverse stock split, and the Company holds 377,358 shares of TrueCar’s common stock on a split-adjusted basis at June 30, 2014. The TrueCar shares are subject to a lockup agreement which expires on or about November 11, 2014.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The following table summarizes the composition of the Company’s investment portfolio by type of security at cost and fair value as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.


	June 30, 2014							December 31, 2013
					Percentage							Percentage
Investment Type	Cost		Fair Value		of Portfolio			Cost		Fair Value		of Portfolio

Private Portfolio Companies:
Preferred Stock	$	41,509,239	$	46,241,789		71.89	%	$	35,858,933	$	42,210,000		68.11	%
Preferred Stock Warrants		1,487,902		1,170,000		1.82	%		-		230,000		0.37	%
Common Stock		3,847,389		2,718,210		4.23	%		8,862,385		5,370,000		8.67	%
Common Stock Warrants		610,860		1,480,000		2.30	%		610,860		1,370,000		2.21	%
Subordinated Convertible Bridge Notes		558,219		775,604		1.21	%		1,242,569		1,242,569		2.00	%

Subtotal - Private Portfolio Companies		48,013,609		52,385,603		81.45	%		46,574,747		50,422,569		81.36	%

Publicly Traded Portfolio Companies:
Common Stock		10,333,329		11,935,475		18.55	%		8,999,996		11,554,236		18.64	%

Total - Private and Publicly Traded Portfolio Companies	$	58,346,938	$	64,321,078		100.00	%	$	55,574,743	$	61,976,805		100.00	%

Fair Value of Investments

The following table categorizes the Company’s cash equivalents, short-term investments, and portfolio company investments measured at fair value based upon the lowest level of significant input used in the valuation as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:


Description	Quoted Prices In Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Fair Value

As of June 30, 2014
Private Portfolio Company Securities:
Preferred Stock	$	-	$	-	$	46,241,789	$	46,241,789
Preferred Stock Warrants		-		-		1,170,000		1,170,000
Common Stock		-		-		2,718,210		2,718,210
Common Stock Warrants		-		-		1,480,000		1,480,000
Subordinated Convertible Bridge Notes		-		-		775,604		775,604

Publicly Traded Portfolio Company Securities:
Common Stock		6,308,703		-		5,626,772		11,935,475

Cash Equivalents:
Money Market Funds		9,529,354		-		-		9,529,354

Total	$	15,838,057	$	-	$	58,012,375	$	73,850,432

As of December 31, 2013
Private Portfolio Company Securities:
Preferred Stock	$	-	$	-	$	42,210,000	$	42,210,000
Preferred Stock Warrants		-		-		230,000		230,000
Common Stock		-		-		5,370,000		5,370,000
Common Stock Warrants		-		-		1,370,000		1,370,000
Subordinated Convertible Bridge Notes		-		-		1,242,569		1,242,569

Publicly Traded Portfolio Company Securities
Common Stock		3,479,994		-		8,074,242		11,554,236

Cash Equivalents:
Money Market Funds		13,371,266		-		-		13,371,266

Total	$	16,851,260	$	-	$	58,496,811	$	75,348,071

Keating Capital, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in fair value for the Company’s portfolio company investments measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the six months ended June 30, 2014:

	Level 3 Portfolio Company Investments (Preferred Stock)			Level 3 Portfolio Company Investments (Preferred Warrants)		Level 3 Portfolio Company Investments (Common Stock)			Level 3 Portfolio Company Investments (Common Warrants)		Level 3 Portfolio Company Investments (Subordinated Convertible Bridge Notes)			Total

Fair Value at December 31, 2013	$	42,210,000		$	230,000	$	13,444,242		$	1,370,000	$	1,242,569		$	58,496,811

Purchases and other adjustments to cost of
Level 3 portfolio company securities (1)		3,723,631			330,645		-			-		384,582			4,438,858

Sale, exchange or conversion of Level 3 portfolio company securities (2)		(484,824	)		310,806		1,242,950			-		(1,068,932	)		-

Gross transfers out of Level 3 to Level 1 (2)		-			-		(7,199,496	)		-		-			(7,199,496	)

Total realized gains (losses) and change in unrealized
appreciation (depreciation)		792,982			298,549		857,286			110,000		217,385			2,276,202

Fair Value at June 30, 2014	$	46,241,789		$	1,170,000	$	8,344,982		$	1,480,000	$	775,604		$	58,012,375

Total change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on Level 3 portfolio company securities held at June 30, 2014	$	792,982		$	298,549	$	857,286		$	110,000	$	217,385		$	2,276,202

(1)	Purchases and other adjustments to cost of Level 3 portfolio company securities include purchases of new investments at cost and payment-in kind interest accreted to principal.

(2)	Exchanges, conversions and transfers out of Level 3 portfolio company securites are reflected at cost if originally acquired during the period or at the fair value as of the beginning of the period if originally acquired before the beginning of the period. Sales of Level 3 portfolio company securities are reflected at the net proceeds from the sale.

	Level 3 Portfolio Company Investments (Preferred Stock)			Level 3 Portfolio Company Investments (Preferred Warrants)		Level 3 Portfolio Company Investments (Common Stock)			Level 3 Portfolio Company Investments (Common Warrants)			Level 3 Portfolio Company Investments (Subordinated Convertible Bridge Notes)		Total

Fair Value at December 31, 2012	$	43,087,120		$	-	$	19,791,002		$	982,878		$	-	$	63,861,000

Purchases and other adjustments to cost of
Level 3 portfolio company securities (1)		3,000,000			-		-			-			1,242,569		4,242,569

Sale, exchange or conversion of Level 3 portfolio company securities (2)		(8,849,995	)		-		5,103,660			(929,062	)		-		(4,675,397	)

Gross transfers out of Level 3 to Level 1 (2)		-			-		(10,761,002	)		-			-		(10,761,002	)

Total realized gains (losses) and change in unrealized
appreciation (depreciation)		4,972,875			230,000		(689,418	)		1,316,184			-		5,829,641

Fair Value at December 31, 2013	$	42,210,000		$	230,000	$	13,444,242		$	1,370,000		$	1,242,569	$	58,496,811

Total change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on Level 3 portfolio company securities held at December 31, 2013	$	4,972,875		$	230,000	$	1,094,247		$	457,122		$	-	$	6,754,244

(1)	Purchases and other adjustments to cost of Level 3 portfolio company securities include purchases of new investments at cost and payment-in kind interest accreted to principal.

(2)	Exchanges, conversions and transfers out of Level 3 portfolio company securites are reflected at cost if originally acquired during the period or at the fair value as of the beginning of the period if originally acquired before the beginning of the period. Sales of Level 3 portfolio company securities are reflected at the net proceeds from the sale.

Significant Unobservable Inputs for Level 3 Portfolio Company Securities

In accordance with ASC 820, the table set forth below provides quantitative information about the Company’s Level 3 fair value measurements of the Company’s investments as of June 30, 2014. In addition to the techniques and inputs noted in the table below, according to the Company’s valuation policy, the Company may also use other valuation techniques and methodologies when determining the Company’s fair value measurements. The below table is not intended to be all-inclusive, but rather provides information on the significant Level 3 inputs as they relate to the Company’s fair value measurements. To the extent an unobservable input is not reflected in the table below, such input is deemed insignificant or is not applicable with respect to the Company’s Level 3 fair value measurements as of June 30, 2014. Significant changes in the inputs in isolation would result in a significant change in the fair value measurement, depending on the input and the materiality of the investment.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

	June 30, 2014
Investment Type	Fair Value		Valuation Techniques / Methodologies	Unobservable Input (1)	Range						Weighted Average (2)

Level 3 Portfolio Company Investments: Preferred Stock	$	46,241,789	Comparable public companies	Revenue multiple		0.7		to	8.6			3.6
				EBITDA multiple		6.3		to	38.5			22.7
				Discount for lack of marketability		20	%	to	40	%		34	%

			Discounted cash flow	Discount rate		23	%	to	65	%		36	%
				Terminal revenue multiple		1.7		to	12.5			4.2
				Terminal EBITDA multiple		9.0		to	39.2			30.7
				Discount for lack of marketability		20	%	to	40	%		34	%


Level 3 Portfolio Company Investments: Preferred Stock Warrants	$	1,170,000	Comparable public companies	Revenue multiple		2.1		to	3.1			2.4
				Discount for lack of marketability		30	%	to	40	%		36	%

			Discounted cash flow	Discount rate		35	%	to	35	%		35	%
				Terminal revenue multiple		2.9		to	3.2			3.1
				Discount for lack of marketability		30	%	to	40	%		36	%


Level 3 Portfolio Company Investments: Common Stock	$	8,344,982	Comparable public companies	Revenue multiple		0.3		to	0.4			n/a
				EBITDA multiple		2.2		to	8.5			3.9
				Discount for lack of marketability		10	%	to	40	%		19	%

			Discounted cash flow	Discount rate		35	%	to	35	%		35	%
				Terminal revenue multiple		0.4		to	2.9			2.9
				Terminal EBITDA multiple		9.0		to	9.0			9.0
				Discount for lack of marketability		10	%	to	40	%		19	%


Level 3 Portfolio Company Investments: Common Stock Warrants	$	1,480,000	Option pricing model	Comparable public company equity volatility		28	%	to	49	%		38	%


Level 3 Portfolio Company Investments: Subordinated Convertible Bridge Notes	$	775,604	Comparable public companies	Revenue multiple		0.7		to	8.5			2.2
				EBITDA multiple		6.3		to	8.5			7.9
				Discount for lack of marketability		35	%	to	35	%		35	%

			Discounted cash flow	Discount rate		35	%	to	65	%		56	%
				Terminal revenue multiple		12.5		to	12.5			12.5
				Terminal EBITDA multiple		9.0		to	9.0			9.0
				Discount for lack of marketability		35	%	to	35	%		35	%

(1)	The significant unobservable inputs that may be used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s investments in convertible preferred stock, common stock, and warrants to purchase common or preferred stock for which market quotations are not readily available include: (i) revenue multiples for comparable transactions, (ii) revenue, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), and price to earnings (“P/E”) multiples (collectively, “Multiples”) for comparable public companies, (iii) discounts rates and terminal year Multiples for comparable public companies applied in a discounted cash flow analysis of the portfolio company; and (iv) a discount for lack of marketability (“DLOM”). For some investments, additional consideration may be given to data from a prior or contemporaneous financing transaction, the last round of financing or a merger or acquisition event near the measurement date (collectively, a “Precedent Transaction”). A change in the assumptions used for Precedent Transactions and Multiples may indicate a directionally similar change in the fair value of the Company’s investments in convertible preferred stock or common stock, while a change in the assumptions used for discount rate and DLOM may indicate a directionally opposite change in the fair value of the portfolio company investment.
	Additional inputs used in the Black Scholes option pricing model include the equity volatility of comparable public companies, risk free interest rate and estimated time to exit. The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s investments in convertible preferred stock warrants and common stock warrants for which market quotations are not readily available is the equity volatility of comparable public companies. A change in the assumption used for equity volatility may indicate a directionally similar change in the fair value of the convertible preferred stock warrant or common stock warrant investment.
	Since the Company invests in convertible debt investments, principally convertible bridge notes, for the primary purpose of potential conversion into equity at a future date, the significant unobservable inputs that may be used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s convertible debt investments on an as-converted to equity basis are the same inputs used by the Company to value its equity securities (including convertible preferred stock). An option pricing model valuation technique may also be used to derive the fair value of the conversion feature of convertible notes. If the Company determines that there is a low likelihood that its convertible debt investments will be converted into equity or repaid in connection with an IPO, sale or next equity financing event, or will otherwise be held for cash payment at maturity, the significant unobservable inputs that may be used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s convertible debt are hypothetical market yields and premiums/(discounts). The hypothetical market yield is defined as the exit price of an investment in a hypothetical market to hypothetical market participants where buyers and sellers are willing participants. The premiums (discounts) relate to company specific characteristics such as underlying investment performance, collateral, and other characteristics of the investment. In certain investments, the Company may value its convertible debt investments using a liquidation approach in which case the realizable value of the collateral would be a significant unobservable input.
(2)	Weighted average based on fair value as of June 30, 2014.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Net Realized Gains and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)

The following table summarizes the net realized gains and net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 for: (i) the Company’s portfolio company investments sold during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, and (ii) the Company’s portfolio company investments held at June 30, 2014 and 2013.


	Three Months Ended									Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2014				June 30, 2013					June 30, 2014					June 30, 2013
Portfolio Companies	Net Realized Gains		Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)		Net Realized Gains		Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)			Net Realized Gains		Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)			Net Realized Gains		Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)

Portfolio Company Investments Sold During Period
Corsair Components, Inc.	$	-	$	-	$	675,317	$	(991,920	)	$	-	$	-		$	675,317	$	(1,599,920	)
LifeLock, Inc.		-		-		3,675,041		(4,095,660	)		-		-			3,675,041		(1,911,002	)
Solazyme, Inc.		-		-		49,820		351,331			-		-			49,820		342,456
Millennial Media, Inc.		-		-		-		-			1,285,846		(1,024,748	)		-		-

Subtotal - Portfolio Company Investments Sold During Period	$	-	$	-	$	4,400,178	$	(4,736,249	)	$	1,285,846	$	(1,024,748	)	$	4,400,178	$	(3,168,466	)

Portfolio Company Investments Held at End of Period		-		2,324,516		-		1,670,692			-		596,826			-		1,359,986

Total - All Portfolio Companies	$	-	$	2,324,516	$	4,400,178	$	(3,065,557	)	$	1,285,846	$	(427,922	)	$	4,400,178	$	(1,808,480	)

See the accompanying schedule of investments for the fair value of the Company’s investments in portfolio companies. The methodology for the determination of the fair value of the Company’s investments in portfolio companies is discussed in Note 2.

4.	Related Party Agreements and Transactions

Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement

In connection with the closing of the Transaction, the Company entered into a new Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement with the investment adviser (“New Advisory Agreement” or the “Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement”). The New Advisory Agreement became effective July 1, 2014 and is identical with respect to all material terms and conditions of the prior Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement between the Company and the investment adviser (the “Prior Advisory Agreement”), which automatically terminated upon the closing of the Transaction in accordance with the 1940 Act. The investment advisory fees under the New Advisory Agreement are the same as the investment advisory fees under the Prior Advisory Agreement and are described below. The New Advisory Agreement was approved by the Company’s stockholders at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 16, 2014. See Note 13 - Subsequent Events.

Subject to the overall supervision of the Company’s Board of Directors, the investment adviser manages the Company’s day-to-day operations and provides the Company with investment advisory services. Under the terms of the Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement between the investment adviser and the Company, the investment adviser: (i) determines the composition of the Company’s investment portfolio, the nature and timing of the changes to the investment portfolio and the manner of implementing such changes; (ii) determines which securities the Company will purchase, retain or sell; (iii) identifies, evaluates and negotiates the structure of investments the Company makes, including performing due diligence on prospective portfolio companies; and (iv) closes, monitors and services the investments the Company makes.

The investment adviser’s services under the Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement are not exclusive, and it is free to furnish similar services to other entities so long as its services to the Company are not impaired.

The Company pays the investment adviser a fee for its investment advisory services under the Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement consisting of two components: (i) a base management fee, and (ii) an incentive fee. The Company’s officers do not receive any compensation directly from the Company. However, the officers of the investment adviser who also serve as the Company’s officers receive compensation from the investment adviser or an affiliate, which may be funded by or economically related to the investment advisory fees paid by the Company to the investment adviser under to the Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Base Management Fee

The base management fee (the “Base Fee”) is calculated at an annual rate of 2% of the Company’s gross assets, where gross assets include any borrowings for investment purposes. The Company did not have any borrowings during the six months ended June 30, 2014 or the year ended December 31, 2013. The Base Fee is payable monthly in arrears, and is calculated based on the value of the Company’s gross assets at the end of the most recently completed calendar quarter, and adjusted for any equity capital raises or repurchases during the current calendar quarter.

Incentive Fee

The incentive fee is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement, as of the termination date), and equals 20% of the Company’s realized capital gains, if any, on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of each calendar year, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid incentive fees, with respect to each of the investments in the Company’s portfolio. For purposes of determining the incentive fee to be paid, realized capital gains, realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation are each determined without regard to the holding period for the Company’s investments and include both long-term (held more than 12 months) and short-term holdings. The investment adviser is not entitled to an incentive fee on investment income generated from interest or dividends on its portfolio company investments. For purposes of calculating the incentive fee, realized capital gains and losses include both short-term and long-term capital gains and losses.

Since inception, the Company has not paid any incentive fees to its investment adviser. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, no incentive fees were due and payable to the investment adviser in accordance with the contractual terms of the Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement since the Company did not generate net realized capital gains in excess of gross unrealized depreciation.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company recorded incentive fee expense of $464,904 and $171,586 resulting from: (i) an increase (decrease) in net unrealized appreciation on its portfolio company investments of $2,324,516 and $(427,922) during such periods, respectively, and (ii) an increase in its cumulative net realized gains of $0 and $1,285,846 during such periods, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recorded an increase in incentive fee expense of $266,924 and $518,339 resulting from: (i) a decrease in net unrealized appreciation on the Company’s portfolio company investments of $3,065,557 and $1,808,480 during such periods, respectively, and (ii) an increase in its cumulative net realized gains of $4,400,178 and $4,400,178 during such periods, respectively.

As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had recorded accrued incentive fees payable to the investment adviser in the amounts of $2,388,474 and $2,216,888, respectively.

Administrative Services

Pursuant to the Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement, the investment adviser furnishes the Company with office facilities, equipment, and clerical, bookkeeping and record-keeping services. The investment adviser also performs, or facilitates the performance of, certain administrative services, which includes being responsible for the financial records which the Company is required to maintain, and preparing reports to the Company’s stockholders and reports filed with the SEC.

In addition, the investment adviser assists the Company with its portfolio accounting and bookkeeping, managing portfolio collections and reporting, performing stockholder and investor relations services, determining and publishing its net asset value, overseeing the preparation and filing of its tax returns, printing and disseminating reports to its stockholders, providing support for its risk management efforts and generally overseeing the payment of its expenses and performance of administrative and professional services rendered to the Company by others.

The Company reimburses the investment adviser for the allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by the investment adviser in performing its administrative obligations under the Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement, including the allocable portion of compensation of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Chief Compliance Officer, and their respective staff. The allocation ratio with respect to compensation of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Chief Compliance Officer is dependent upon the amount of time each devotes to matters on behalf of the Company and the investment adviser, respectively. Allocated administrative expenses are payable to the investment adviser monthly in arrears. Effective beginning February 20, 2013, the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Compliance Officer positions have been held by a single individual.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Duration and Termination

The Prior Advisory Agreement, which automatically terminated upon the closing the Transaction on July 1, 2014, was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on April 17, 2009, and by the Company’s stockholders on May 14, 2009. On April 9, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors, including the “non-interested” directors, as such term is defined under the 1940 Act (the “Non-interested Directors”), renewed the Prior Advisory for an additional year.

The New Advisory Agreement, which was entered into on July 1, 2014 as part of the closing of the Transaction, will remain in effect for a period of two years, unless sooner terminated. The New Advisory Agreement was approved by the Company’s stockholders at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 16, 2014. After the initial two-year period, the New Advisory Agreement will remain in effect from year-to-year thereafter if approved annually by: (i) the vote of the Board of Directors, or by the vote of a majority of the Company’s outstanding voting securities, and (ii) the vote of a majority of the directors who are not interested persons. An affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Company’s outstanding voting securities is also necessary in order to make material amendments to the New Advisory Agreement.

The New Advisory Agreement automatically terminates in the event of its assignment. As required by the 1940 Act, the New Advisory Agreement provides that the Company may terminate the agreement without penalty upon 60 days’ written notice to the investment adviser. If the investment adviser wishes to voluntarily terminate the New Advisory Agreement, it must give stockholders a minimum of 120 days’ notice prior to termination and must pay all expenses associated with its termination. The New Advisory Agreement may also be terminated, without penalty, upon the vote of a majority of the Company’s outstanding voting securities. See Note 13 - Subsequent Events.

License Agreement

The Company previously entered into a license agreement (the “License Agreement”) with the investment adviser, pursuant to which the investment adviser granted the Company a non-exclusive license to use the name “Keating.” Under the License Agreement, the Company had the right to use the “Keating” name and logo without license fee for so long as the investment adviser or one of its affiliates remained the Company’s investment adviser. Other than with respect to this limited license, the Company had no legal right to the “Keating” name or logo.

On July 1, 2014, as part of the closing of the Transaction, the License Agreement terminated, and the Company entered into a sublicense agreement (the “Sublicense Agreement”) with the investment adviser pursuant to which the investment adviser granted the Company a non-exclusive license to use the name “BDCA.” Under the Sublicense Agreement, the Company will have a right to use the BDCA name and logo, for so long as the investment adviser remains the Company’s investment adviser. Other than with respect to this limited license, the Company will have no legal right to the “BDCA” name or logo. The Sublicense Agreement will remain in effect for so long as the New Advisory Agreement with the investment adviser is in effect. The Sublicense Agreement will also terminate upon the expiration or termination of the license agreement between BDCA Adviser and the investment adviser pursuant to which BDCA Adviser granted the investment adviser a non-exclusive license to use the name “BDCA,” including the limited right to sublicense such use to any business development company to whom the investment adviser provides investment advisory services. See Note 13 - Subsequent Events.

Receivable Due from Related Party

As part of the Transaction, BDCA Adviser agreed to reimburse the Company at the closing for the costs incurred in connection with the Company’s 2014 annual stockholder meeting, including legal and accounting fees and proxy solicitation costs, which related to obtaining stockholder approval of the New Advisory Agreement, which costs would not otherwise have been incurred by the Company. As of June 30, 2014, BDCA Adviser had agreed to reimburse the Company for such costs in the amount of $97,866. The Company recorded this amount as a receivable due from related party as of June 30, 2014. BDCA Adviser paid this amount to the Company at the closing of the Transaction on July 1, 2014. See Note 13 – Subsequent Events.

5.	Equity Offerings and Related Costs

On December 17, 2013, the Company completed a rights offering of its common stock to record stockholders. The Company sold 713,562 shares of common stock in the rights offering at a subscription price of $6.00 per share, resulting in gross proceeds of $4,281,372. In connection with the rights offering, the Company incurred $359,364 of offering costs, resulting in net proceeds of $3,922,008.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

During the three months ended June 30, 2014, the Company issued 237,699 shares of its common stock to its stockholders as part of its quarterly distributions declared for the first and second quarter of 2014. These shares were issued at an average price per share of $6.06, which represented a 17.4% discount to the Company’s net asset value of $7.34 as of March 31, 2014. See Note 7 – Dividends and Distributions.

6.	Stock Repurchases

On May 9, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $5 million for a period of six months, which was subsequently extended until May 8, 2013. On April 25, 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors further extended the stock repurchase program until November 8, 2013. On October 24, 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors discontinued the stock repurchase program in order to make additional capital available for potential new investment opportunities. Since inception of the stock repurchase program, the Company has repurchased a total of 448,441 shares of common stock, which shares have not been retired or cancelled, remain issued but not outstanding shares, and were held in treasury as of June 30, 2014. The Company has accounted for the repurchases of its common stock under the cost method, such that repurchased shares were recorded as treasury stock based on the actual cost of the repurchases.

7.	Dividends and Distributions

Distributions to the Company’s stockholders are payable only when and as declared by the Company’s Board of Directors and are paid out of assets legally available for distribution. All distributions are paid at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Since the Company’s portfolio company investments will typically not generate current income (i.e., dividends or interest income), the Company does not typically expect to generate net ordinary income from which it could make distributions to its stockholders. The amount of distributions will also depend on the Company’s financial condition, maintenance of its RIC status, corporate-level income and excise tax planning, compliance with applicable business development company regulations and such other factors as the Company’s Board of Directors may deem relevant from time to time. The Company may also in the future choose to pay a portion of its dividends using shares of its common stock, in which case stockholders may be required to pay tax in excess of the cash portion of the dividend received.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The following table summarizes the Company’s dividends declared for the first and second quarter of 2014 and the years 2011, 2012 and 2013:



Date Declared	Record Date	Payment Date	Dividend Per Share			Source of Distribution

2014 Dividends:
February 20, 2014	March 6, 2014	April 14, 2014	$	0.10	(1)	Capital Gains / Return of Capital (2)
February 20, 2014	May 8, 2014	June 17, 2014		0.10	(1)	Capital Gains / Return of Capital (2)
Total - 2014 Dividends				0.20

2013 Dividends:
May 28, 2013	June 14, 2013	June 26, 2013		0.24		Capital Gains
May 28, 2013	September 13, 2013	September 25, 2013		0.24		Capital Gains
December 19, 2013	December 30, 2013	January 13, 2014		0.01		Capital Gains (3)
Total - 2013 Dividends				0.49

2012 Dividends:
December 6, 2012	December 14, 2012	December 26, 2012		0.03		Capital Gains
Total - 2012 Dividends				0.03

2011 Dividends:
February 11, 2011	February 15, 2011	February 17, 2011		0.13		Return of Capital (4)
Total - 2011 Dividends				0.13

Total - Cumulative			$	0.85

(1)	This dividend was paid in cash and shares of the Company's common stock. Please see the discussion immediately following this table for more detail about the composition of this dividend.

(2)	The determination of the tax attributes of the 2014 dividends will be made as of the end of 2014 based upon the Company's net realized gains for the full year and distributions paid for the full year. Therefore, a determination made on a quarterly basis may not be representative of the actual tax attributes of 2014 dividends for a full year. If the Company's determined the tax attributes of its first and second quarter 2014 dividends as of June 30, 2014, 67% of such dividends would be from long-term capital gains and 33% of such dividends would be a return of capital.

(3)	Although the dividend of $0.01 per share was paid on January 13, 2014, this dividend was taxable to stockholders as if paid in 2013. For income and excise tax purposes, this dividend was eligible for the dividends paid deduction by the Company's in 2013.

(4)	The February 2011 distribution was a special cash distribution based on the unrealized appreciation the Company's had recorded on its NeoPhotonics investment at the time of the distribution, following NeoPhotonics’ completion of its IPO.

On February 20, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.10 per share payable on April 14, 2014 and June 17, 2014, to common stockholders of record on March 6, 2014 and May 8, 2014, respectively. Stockholders had the option to receive payment of these dividends in cash or in shares of the Company’s common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all stockholders for each dividend was limited to 25% of the aggregate dividend amount. Based on stockholder elections, the April 14, 2014 dividend consisted of $238,722 in cash and 119,157 shares of common stock, or 1.2% of the Company’s outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment, and the June 17, 2014 dividend consisted of $241,701 in cash and 118,542 shares of common stock, or 1.2% of the Company’s outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment.

For both the April and June 2014 dividend payments, the amount of cash elected to be received by stockholders was greater than the cash limit of 25% of the aggregate dividend amount, thus resulting in the payment of a combination of cash and stock to stockholders who elected to receive cash. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion of the April 14, 2014 dividend was calculated based on a price of $6.0103 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on April 7, 8 and 9, 2014, and which represented a 18.1% discount to the Company’s net asset value of $7.34 as of March 31, 2014. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion of the June 17, 2014 dividend was calculated based on a price of $6.1169 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on June 10, 11 and 12, 2014, and which represented a 16.7% discount to the Company’s net asset value of $7.34 as of March 31, 2014.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On February 20, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a quarterly distribution policy where it intends to pay regular quarterly distributions to the Company’s stockholders based on the Company’s estimated net capital gains (which are defined as the Company’s realized capital gains in excess of realized capital losses during the year, without regard to the long-term or short-term character of such gains or losses) for the year. The Company’s Board of Directors also determined that it intends to pay the regular quarterly distributions under the Company’s quarterly distribution policy in cash or the Company’s common stock at the election of stockholders, subject to a limitation that no more than 25% of the aggregate distribution will be paid in cash with the remainder paid in shares of the Company’s common stock.

In accordance with the Company’s quarterly distribution policy, on February 20, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors also declared a regular distribution for the third quarter of 2014 in the amount of $0.10 per share. The record and payment dates for this distribution are as follows:

Regular Dividend		Amount per Share		Record Date		Payment Date
Third Quarter		$0.10		August 11, 2014		September 18, 2014

This quarterly distribution will be paid in cash or the Company’s common stock at the election of stockholders, subject to a limitation that no more than 25% of the aggregate distribution will be paid in cash with the remainder paid in shares of the Company’s common stock.

In the event the Company retains some or all of its realized net capital gains, including amounts retained to pay incentive fees to the investment adviser, the Company may designate the retained amount as a deemed distribution to stockholders. In such case, among other consequences, the Company will pay corporate-level tax on the retained amount, each U.S. stockholder will be required to include its share of the deemed distribution in income as if it had been actually distributed to the U.S. stockholder, and the U.S. stockholder will be entitled to claim a credit or refund equal to its allocable share of the corporate-level tax the Company pays on the retained realized net capital gain.

For income tax purposes, distributions paid to stockholders are reported as ordinary income, return of capital, long-term capital gains or a combination thereof.

The Company maintains a dividend reinvestment plan (“DRIP”) that provides for the reinvestment of dividends on behalf of its stockholders, unless a stockholder has elected to receive dividends in cash. As a result, if the Company declares a dividend, stockholders who have not “opted out” of the DRIP by the dividend record date will have their dividend automatically reinvested into additional shares of common stock. Although the Company has a number of options to satisfy the share requirements of the DRIP, it currently expects that the shares required to be purchased under the DRIP will be acquired through open market purchases of common stock by the DRIP administrator. The shares purchased in the open market to satisfy the DRIP requirements will be valued based upon the average price of the applicable shares purchased by the DRIP administrator. The Company has suspended, and intends in the future to suspend, its DRIP with respect to the entirety of any distribution which is payable in cash and shares of the Company’s common stock at the election of stockholders.

8.	Commitments and Contingencies

In the normal course of business, the Company may enter into investment agreements under which it commits to make an investment in a portfolio company at some future date or over a specified period of time. At June 30, 2014, the Company had not entered into any investment agreements which required it to make a future investment in a portfolio company.

On November 6, 2013, the Company exchanged its preferred stock interests in Jumptap, Inc. for shares of common stock in Millennial Media, Inc., a publicly traded company, pursuant to a merger transaction. As part of the merger agreement, the Company, together with other participating stockholders of Jumptap, agreed to indemnify Millennial Media for inaccuracies in any representations or warranties made by Jumptap, any breach by Jumptap of any covenants or agreements, and certain other claims. Participating stockholders, including the Company, were required to set aside in escrow shares of Millennial Media for the one-year period following the closing as partial security for potential stockholder indemnification obligations. The Company has set aside 135,194 shares of Millennial Media as part of this escrow fund. Any claim for stockholder indemnification must generally be made by Millennial Media within the one-year period following the closing. In addition, recovery under the stockholder indemnity obligation is generally limited to the escrow fund. The Company has not been notified of any stockholder indemnity claims and, accordingly, the Company has assumed that all of its escrowed shares will be released on the one-year anniversary of the closing for purposes of valuing its interests in Millennial Media’s common stock as of June 30, 2014.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The Company maintains liability insurance for its officers and directors. The Company has also agreed to indemnify its directors and officers to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law subject to the restrictions in the 1940 Act.

Absent the willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence of the investment adviser or the investment adviser’s reckless disregard of its duties and obligations, the Company has agreed to indemnify the investment adviser (including its officers, managers, agents, employees and members) for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising out of the investment adviser’s performance of its duties and obligations under both the Prior Advisory Agreement and the New Advisory Agreement, except to the extent specified in the 1940 Act.

As of June 30, 2014, the Company was not a party to any material legal proceedings. However, from time to time, the Company may be party to certain legal proceedings incidental to the normal course of its business including the enforcement of its rights under contracts with its portfolio companies.

9.	Changes in Net Assets Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of the basic and diluted per share net decrease in net assets resulting from operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,		June 30,			June 30,
	2014		2013		2014			2013

Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations	$	1,120,628	$	9,155	$	(912,639	)	$	(34,432	)

Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding		9,669,274		9,086,011		9,609,420			9,125,987

Basic and diluted net increase (decrease) in net assets per share
resulting from operations	$	0.12		*	$	(0.09	)		*

* Per share amounts less than $0.01.

During the three and six months June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company had no dilutive securities outstanding.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

10.	Financial Highlights

The following is a schedule of financial highlights for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.


	Six Months Ended
	June 30,			June 30,
	2014			2013

Per common share data
Net asset value, beginning of period	$	7.65		$	8.00

Net investment loss (1)		(0.18	)		(0.29	)
Net realized gain on investments (1)		0.13			0.48
Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments (1)		(0.04	)		0.20

Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations		(0.09	)		*

Stockholder distributions:
Stockholder distributions paid from net realized gains		(0.13	)		(0.24	)
Distributions in excess of net investment income and net realized gains		(0.07	)		-

Net decrease in net assets resulting from stockholder distributions		(0.20	)		(0.24	)

Capital stock transactions:
Issuance of common stock as stock dividend distribution (2)		(0.04	)		-
Repurchases of common stock (3)		-			0.03

Net increase in net assets from capital stock transactions		(0.04	)		0.03

Net asset value, end of period	$	7.32		$	7.79

Ratios and supplemental data:
Per share market price, end of period	$	5.91			6.78
Total return based on change in net asset value (4)		(1.74	%)		0.30	%
Total return based on stock price (5)		(0.69	%)		12.09	%
Common shares outstanding, end of period		9,786,601			8,972,226
Weighted average common shares outstanding during period		9,609,420			9,125,987
Net assets, end of period	$	71,646,408		$	69,908,801
Annualized ratio of operating expenses to average net assets (6)		4.86	%		6.57	%
Annualized ratio of net investment loss to average net assets		(4.95	%)		(7.28	%)
Weighted average debt per common share (7)	$	-		$	-
Portfolio turnover (8)		4.12	%		20.66	%

*Per share amount less than $0.01 per share. Note, for the six months ended June 30, 2013, due to rounding, the components for the decrease in net assets resulting from operations do not subtotal to less than $0.01 per share.

(1)	Based on weighted average shares outstanding during the period.

(2)	Represents the dilutive effect of issuing common stock below net asset value per share during the period in connection with the payment of the Company’s stock dividend distributions during the period. See Note 7, Dividends and Distributions.

(3)	Represents the increase in net asset value attributable to repurchases of common stock during the period.

(4)	Total return based on net asset value is calculated based on the change in net asset value per share taking into account distributions reinvested at the beginning of the period net asset value per share. The total return has not been annualized.

(5)	Total return based on stock price is calculated based on the change in the market price of the Company's shares taking into account distributions reinvested in accordance with the Company's dividend reinvestment plan, or lacking such plan, at the lesser of net asset value or market price per share on dividend distribution date. The total return has not been annualized.

(6)	Operating expenses and net investment loss for periods of less than one year are annualized, and the ratios of operating expenses to average net assets and net investment loss to average net assets are adjusted accordingly. However, incentive fees payable to the Company's investment adviser are not annualized. Separately calculated, the ratio of non-annualized incentive fees to average net assets were 0.24% and 0.72% for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Because the ratios are calculated for the Company’s common stock taken as a whole, an individual investor’s ratios may vary from these ratios.

(7)	During the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company did not have any debt for borrowed money.

(8)	Portfolio turnover is calculated as net proceeds from the sale of portfolio company investments during the period divided by average net assets during the period.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

11.	Income Taxes

Because the Company distributed 100% of its net realized capital gains for the years ended December 31, 2013, no corporate-level federal income or excise taxes were due on such net realized capital gains and, as such, the Company did not make any provision for federal income or excise taxes as of December 31, 2013. The Company intends to operate so as to qualify as a RIC in 2014, and, based on the Company’s current quarterly distribution policy to distribute 100% of its net realized gains to stockholders, the Company has made no provision for income taxes as of June 30, 2014.

As of December 31, 2013, the Company’s net investment loss (before incentive fees) of $3,789,646, representing the Company’s 2013 ordinary loss for tax purposes which may not be carried forward to future years by a RIC, was reclassified to additional paid-in-capital. The portion of the Company’s net investment loss attributable to incentive fee expense has not been reclassified to additional paid-in-capital as of December 31, 2013 since incentive fee expense represents a temporary, rather than permanent, book-to-tax difference.

The aggregate gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation, the net unrealized appreciation, and the aggregate cost of the Company’s portfolio company securities for federal income tax purposes as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were as follows:


	June 30,			December 31,
	2014			2013

Aggregate cost of portfolio company securities
for federal income tax purposes (1)	$	58,346,938		$	55,574,743

Gross unrealized appreciation of portfolio company securities		15,522,362			15,305,394
Gross unrealized depreciation of portfolio company securities		(9,548,222	)		(8,903,332	)

Net unrealized appreciation of portfolio company securities	$	5,974,140		$	6,402,062

(1)	Includes cumulative PIK interest accreted to principal.

As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had no undistributed ordinary income, undistributed long-term capital gains or capital loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes.

12.	Investments in and Advances to Affiliates

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company had one portfolio company investment, Metabolon, which was an Affiliate Investment, and the Company had no Control Investments. The following is a schedule of the Company’s investments in this affiliate during the three and months ended June 30, 2014. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company made no advances to this affiliate.

Keating Capital, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

				Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended
				June 30, 2014		June 30, 2014

Portfolio Company (1)	Investment Description	Number of Shares / Warrants		Amount of Interest and Dividends Credited to Income (2)		Amount of Interest and Dividends Credited to Income (2)		December 31, 2013 Fair Value		Gross Additions (3)		Gross Reductions (4)		June 30, 2014 Fair Value

Affiliate Investments
Metabolon, Inc.	Series D Convertible Preferred Stock		2,229,021		-	$	-	$	6,140,000	$	-	$	-	$	6,140,000

Total Affiliate Investments				$	-	$	-	$	6,140,000	$	-	$	-	$	6,140,000

(1)	The Company had no control investments as defined by the 1940 Act during the six months ended June 30, 2014.

(2)	Affiliate investments consist of convertible preferred stock, common stock and common stock warrants that are generally non-income producing and restricted. The convertible preferred stock investment carries a non-cumulative, preferred dividend payable when and if declared by the portfolio company's board of directors. Since no dividends have been declared or paid, or are expected to be declared or paid, with respect to these convertible preferred stock investments, these investments are considered to be non-income producing.

(3)	Gross additions include increases in investments resulting from new portfolio company investments, paid-in-kind interest or dividends, and exchange of one or more existing securities for one or more new securities. Gross additions also include net decreases in unrealized depreciation or net increases in unrealized appreciation.

(4)	Gross reductions include decreases in investments resulting from sales and the exchange of one or more existing securities for one or more new securities. Gross reductions also include net increases in unrealized depreciation or net decreases in unrealized appreciation.

The above schedule should be read in conjunction with the Schedule of Investments and Notes 2 and 3 to these Financial Statements.

13.	Subsequent Events

In preparing these financial statements, the Company has evaluated events after June 30, 2014. Except as set forth below, there were no subsequent events since June 30, 2014 that would require adjustment to or additional disclosure in these financial statements.

Change of Control of Investment Adviser

On July 1, 2014, the members of the Company’s investment adviser completed the sale of 100% of their issued and outstanding equity interests (the “Transaction”) of the investment adviser to BDCA Adviser. Upon the closing of the Transaction, the investment adviser became a wholly-owned subsidiary of BDCA Adviser. Because there was a change of control of the investment adviser in connection with the Transaction, an assignment of the Prior Advisory Agreement under the 1940 Act occurred. This assignment automatically terminated the Prior Advisory Agreement in accordance with its terms as required by Section 15 of the 1940 Act.

In connection with the closing of the Transaction, the Company entered into the New Advisory Agreement with the investment adviser (“New Advisory Agreement”). The New Advisory Agreement became effective July 1, 2014 and is identical with respect to all material terms and conditions of the Prior Advisory Agreement between the Company and the investment adviser. The New Advisory Agreement was approved by the Company’s stockholders at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 16, 2014.

In connection with the closing of the Transaction, (i) the Company changed its name to BDCA Venture, Inc., (ii) the investment adviser changed its name to BDCA Venture Adviser, LLC, (iii) the license agreement between the Company and the investment adviser for the Company’s use of the “KEATING” name terminated, and (iv) the Company entered into a sublicense agreement with the investment adviser pursuant to which the investment adviser granted the Company a non-exclusive license to use the “BDCA” name.

As part of the Transaction, BDCA Adviser agreed to reimburse the Company at the closing for the costs incurred in connection with the Company's 2014 annual stockholder meeting, including legal and accounting fees and proxy solicitation costs, which related to obtaining stockholder approval of the New Advisory Agreement, which costs would not otherwise have been incurred by the Company. As of June 30, 2014, BDCA Adviser had agreed to reimburse the Company for such costs in the amount of $97,866. The Company recorded this amount as a receivable due from related party as of June 30, 2014. BDCA Adviser paid this amount to the Company at the closing of the Transaction on July 1, 2014.

The Company did not raise any capital, nor were any new securities issued by the Company, in connection with the Transaction.

Portfolio Company Activity

On July 2, 2014, the Company purchased shares of SilkRoad’s Series D-1 convertible preferred stock for an aggregate purchase price of $268,853 in a subsequent closing of SilkRoad’s Series D financing. In connection with the Company’s purchase of these shares of Series D-1 convertible preferred stock, the Company also received shares of Series D-2 convertible preferred stock in exchange for all of the shares of Class B Common Stock that it received in the initial closing of the Series D financing on June 25, 2014 upon the automatic conversion of certain convertible bridge notes held by the Company.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND PROJECTIONS

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but are based on current management expectations that involve substantial risks, uncertainties, and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. We generally identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “could,” “intends,” “target,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar words. Important assumptions include our ability to originate new portfolio company investment opportunities, the success of our portfolio companies in completing an initial public offering within our targeted timeframes, our ability to achieve certain returns on our investments, and our ability to access additional capital. The forward-looking statements contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q include statements as to:

●

our future operating results;

●

our business prospects and the prospects of our existing and prospective portfolio companies;

●

the impact of the investments we expect to make;

●

our ability to identify future portfolio companies that meet our investment criteria;

●

stockholder approval of a new investment advisory and administrative services agreement between us and our investment adviser;

●

the impact of a protracted decline in the market for IPOs on our business;

●

our relationships with venture capital firms and investment banks that are the primary sources of our investment opportunities;

●

the expected market for venture capital investments in later stage, private, pre-IPO companies;

●

the dependence of our future success on the general economy and its impact on the industries in which we invest;

●

our ability to access the equity markets to raise capital to fund future portfolio company investments;

●

the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their operating performance objectives and complete an IPO within our targeted timeframe;

●

our ability to invest at valuations which allow us to achieve our targeted returns within our expected holding periods;

●

our regulatory structure and tax status, including any changes in laws and regulations;

●

our ability to operate as a business development company and a regulated investment company;

●

the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital;

●

our ability to generate realized capital gains from the disposition of our portfolio company interests after they have completed an IPO;

●

the timing, form and amount of any dividend distributions;

●

the valuation of any investments in portfolio companies, particularly those having no liquid trading market; and

●

our ability to recover unrealized losses.

Although we believe that the assumptions on which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also could be inaccurate. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved. These risks and uncertainties include those described or identified in “Risk Factors” in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K previously filed with the SEC and in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Except as required by the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. The forward-looking statements and projections contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q are excluded from the safe harbor protection provided by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. In addition to historical information, the following discussion and other parts of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q contain forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated by such forward-looking information due to the factors discussed under “Risk Factors” in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K previously filed with the SEC and “Forward-Looking Statements and Projections” and the “Risk Factors” appearing elsewhere herein.

Overview

We are a closed-end, non-diversified investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act (the “1940 Act”). As a business development company, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. For instance, we generally have to invest at least 70% of our total assets in “qualifying assets,” including securities of private U.S. companies, cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. Effective January 1, 2010, we elected to be treated for tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or a RIC, under Subchapter M of the Code (the “Code”). We satisfied the RIC requirements for our 2013 taxable year, and we intend to operate so as to qualify as a RIC in 2014.

We are externally managed by BDCA Venture Adviser, LLC, f/k/a Keating Investments, an SEC-registered investment adviser that was founded in 1997 and is registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”). On July 1, 2014, the members of our investment adviser completed the sale of 100% of their issued and outstanding equity interests (the “Transaction”) of the investment adviser to BDCA Adviser, LLC (“BDCA Adviser”). Upon the closing of the Transaction, our investment adviser became a wholly-owned subsidiary of BDCA Adviser and changed its name to BDCA Venture Adviser, LLC (“BDCA Venture Adviser”).

Because there was a change of control of our investment adviser in connection with the Transaction, an assignment of the Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement between us and Keating Investments (the “Prior Advisory Agreement”) under the 1940 Act occurred. This assignment automatically terminated the Prior Advisory Agreement in accordance with its terms as required by Section 15 of the 1940 Act, and we entered into a new Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement with BDCA Venture Adviser (the “New Advisory Agreement” or the “Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement”). The New Advisory Agreement became effective July 1, 2014 and is identical with respect to all material terms and conditions of the Prior Advisory Agreement between us and the investment adviser. The investment advisory fees under the New Advisory Agreement are the same as the investment advisory fees under the Prior Advisory Agreement. The New Advisory Agreement was approved by our stockholders at our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 16, 2014.

In connection with the closing of the Transaction, we changed our name to BDCA Venture, Inc. (“BDCA Venture”), effective July 1, 2014. Our stockholders continue to own the same amount and type of shares in BDCA Venture as they did with Keating Capital. We did not raise any capital, nor were any new securities issued by us, in connection with the Transaction. The shares of BDCA Venture continue to be listed on Nasdaq and began trading under the new ticker “BDCV” on July 2, 2014.

Our investment adviser is responsible for managing our day-to-day operations including, without limitation, identifying, evaluating, negotiating, closing, monitoring and servicing our investments. Our investment adviser also provides us with the administrative services necessary for us to operate. Our investment activities are currently managed by our investment adviser pursuant to the New Advisory Agreement between us and BDCA Venture Adviser. Our investment adviser sources our investments through its principal office located in Greenwood Village, Colorado as well as through an additional office in Palo Alto, California.

Since our first investment in January 2010 through June 30, 2014, we have invested $72.0 million in a total of 22 portfolio companies, and we were the lead investor in seven of those transactions. Of those 22 investments, five companies have successfully priced IPOs, one portfolio company publicly filed a registration statement for an IPO but was sold to a private equity firm, and one portfolio company was acquired in a merger with a publicly traded company. One of our private portfolio companies—Zoosk, Inc.—has publicly filed a registration statement for an IPO.

We believe two of our portfolio companies may complete an IPO in the second half of this year. However, the timing of the completion of an IPO or strategic sale/merger by any of our private portfolio companies is highly uncertain and can be affected by a number of factors including the portfolio company’s performance, equity market trends, market volatility, recent IPO performance, and sectors that may be in or out of favor with IPO investors. Accordingly, there can be no assurances that any of these private portfolio companies will complete an IPO or strategic sale/merger.

Our Investment Objective and Strategy

Our investment objective is to maximize capital appreciation. We seek to accomplish our capital appreciation objective by making investments in the equity and equity-linked securities of later stage, typically venture capital-backed, pre-IPO companies. We focus on acquiring equity securities that are typically a portfolio company’s most senior preferred stock at the time of our investment or, in cases where we acquire common shares, the portfolio company typically has only common stock outstanding. However, we may also invest in debt securities, including convertible bridge notes, issued by a portfolio company typically seeking to raise capital to fund their operations until an IPO, sale/merger or next equity financing event. Convertible debt securities, including bridge notes, which we refer to as equity-linked securities, are typically subordinated to the portfolio company’s senior debt, and we generally intend to hold these securities for the purpose of conversion into equity at a future date. In accordance with our investment objective, we seek to invest in equity and equity-linked securities of principally U.S.-based, private companies with an equity value typically between $100 million and $1 billion. We refer to companies with an equity value of between $100 million and less than $250 million as “micro-cap companies” and companies with an equity value of between $250 million and $1 billion as “small-cap companies.”

We specialize in making pre-IPO investments in emerging growth companies that are committed to and capable of becoming public. We provide investors with the ability to participate in a publicly traded fund that allows our stockholders to share in the potential value accretion that we believe typically occurs once a company transforms from private to public status, or what we refer to as the private-to-public valuation arbitrage. Our shares are listed on Nasdaq under the ticker symbol “BDCV.” Our strategy is to evaluate and invest in companies prior to the valuation accretion that we believe occurs once private companies complete an initial public offering. We seek to capture this value accretion by investing primarily in private, micro-cap and small-cap companies that meet our core investment criteria: they (i) generate annual revenue in excess of $20 million on a trailing 12-month basis and have growth potential; (ii) are committed to, capable of, and will benefit from becoming public companies; and (iii) create the potential to achieve a targeted 2x return on our investment within our expected investment horizon of four years. We may also pursue investments with a shorter expected investment horizon, where we believe the portfolio company may complete an IPO sooner than our targeted two-year period from our initial investment, in which case our targeted return may be correspondingly reduced. Our investment strategy can be summarized as buy privately, sell publicly, capture the difference.

By design, our fund has been structured as a high risk/high return investment vehicle. While we have discretion in the investment of our capital, we seek long-term capital appreciation through investments principally in equity or equity-linked securities that we believe will maximize our total return.

Our primary source of investment return will be generated from net capital gains, if any, realized on the disposition of our portfolio company investments, which typically will occur after a portfolio company completes an IPO and after expiration of a customary 180-day post-IPO lockup restriction and, to a lesser extent, is acquired. We intend to maximize our potential for capital appreciation by taking advantage of the private-to-public valuation arbitrage, or the premium, that we believe is generally associated with having a more liquid asset, such as a publicly traded security. Typically, we believe investors place a premium on liquidity, or having the ability to sell stock more quickly and efficiently through an established stock exchange than through private transactions. Specifically, we believe that an exchange listing, if obtained, should generally provide our portfolio companies with greater visibility, marketability and liquidity than they would otherwise be able to achieve without such a listing. As a result, we believe that public companies typically trade at higher valuations than private companies with similar financial attributes. By going public and listing on an exchange, we believe that our portfolio companies have the potential to receive the benefit of this liquidity premium. There can be no assurance that our portfolio companies will trade at these higher valuations once they are public and listed on an exchange.

We target our investments in portfolio companies that we believe can complete this value transformation within our targeted four-year holding period, compared to private equity and venture capital funds which we believe typically take seven to 10 years. As a result, we may have low or negative returns in our initial years with any potential valuation accretion typically occurring in later years as our portfolio companies potentially are able to complete their IPOs and become publicly traded. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve our targeted return on any individual portfolio company investment if and when it goes public, or on the portfolio as a whole.

We continue to believe that public companies typically trade at higher valuations than private companies with similar financial attributes. The five portfolio companies that have completed IPOs (NeoPhotonics, Inc., Solazyme, Inc., LifeLock, Inc., Tremor Video, Inc. and TrueCar, Inc.) had unrealized returns at the time of their IPOs, based on their IPO price, of 1.8x, 2.0x, 1.7x, 1.5x and 1.1x our investment cost, respectively. However, the stock prices of each of these companies have changed since the IPO, and there is no assurance that we will be able to sell any of our portfolio company investments, following our lockup restrictions, at prices that will allow us to achieve our targeted 2x return on investment once the companies are publicly traded and assuming our targeted four-year investment horizon.

We have an IPO, event-driven strategy, and we attempt to generate returns by accepting the risks of owning illiquid securities of later stage private companies. We believe that investing in an issuer’s most senior equity securities and/or negotiating certain structural protections are ways to potentially mitigate the otherwise high risks associated with pre-IPO investing. However, the process of transforming from private to public ownership is subject to the uncertainties of the IPO process. If this process happened quickly and with certainty, we believe there would be less of an illiquidity discount available (and hence, less potential return) to us when we make our investments. Instead, the private-to-public transformation process takes time and is subject to market conditions, and we therefore incorporate a targeted four-year average holding period for each portfolio company into our strategy. However, as of June 30, 2014, 13 of our private portfolio companies have not completed an IPO or strategic sale or merger within our targeted two-year time period from initial investment. Accordingly, our overall holding periods may also be longer than our targeted four-year holding period which would adversely affect our portfolio company-level internal rates of return (“IRR”).

Because the equity and equity-linked securities of pre-IPO companies typically do not pay any current income, we will consider investments in qualified private and public companies that generate current yield in the form of interest income which can be used to offset some of our operating expenses. These investments typically will be in the form of debt instruments providing for the current payment of interest, which may be convertible into equity securities or have separate warrants exercisable for equity securities so that we have an opportunity to achieve long-term capital appreciation. To the extent that we make investments in public companies, we anticipate that the market capitalizations of these companies would typically be below $250 million and that we would be willing to generally accept a reduced level of potential capital appreciation in exchange for the payment of a current yield on our investments to offset some of our operating expenses. In addition to broadening our potential sources of return, we believe that the ability to generate current yield in the form of interest income on some of our investments may be attractive to our investors.

We believe that there are four critical factors that will drive the success of our pre-IPO investing strategy, differentiate us from other potential investors in later stage, venture-backed private companies, and potentially enable us to complete equity transactions in pre-IPO companies that we believe will meet our expected targeted return. First, we generally focus on companies with an equity value of typically between $100 million and $1 billion—companies we believe are better positioned to achieve our targeted return on our investment once the company is publicly traded. Second, we focus on prospective portfolio companies where we can purchase securities directly from an issuer or from a selling stockholder in a negotiated transaction and can obtain business and financial information on the portfolio company. Third, we focus on acquiring equity securities that are typically the issuer’s most senior preferred stock at the time of our investment or, in cases where we acquire shares of common stock, the issuer typically has only common stock outstanding. And lastly, we are focused on the acquisition of private securities at a valuation that creates the potential for our targeted return on our investment once the company is publicly traded. We believe that larger, highly-publicized, private companies may create the risk to a prospective investor of being either fully or, in certain cases, over-valued relative to publicly traded peers, which diminishes the opportunity for us to realize the potential value accretion that we believe exists when a private company completes an IPO.

Market Opportunity and Competition

We seek to invest in micro-cap and small-cap companies across a broad range of growth industries that we believe are being transformed by technological, economic and social forces. Since our initial investment in January 2010, we have historically focused on venture capital-backed technology companies.

We believe that an attractive market opportunity exists for us as a provider of pre-IPO financing to emerging growth companies that meet our investment criteria for the following reasons:

● Companies staying private longer. The venture capital-backed companies that we typically target are staying private significantly longer than in the past. As a result, we believe there is a growing pipeline of more mature private companies that are currently able to satisfy investor demands for growth and prospects for near-term profitability.

● Need for pre-IPO financing. As a result of the changing IPO market conditions over the last several years, we believe micro- and small-cap companies generally must demonstrate an ability to raise private capital prior to an IPO to be successful in the IPO process. We believe such pre-IPO financing evidences existing investors’ continuing commitment to the company, validates increased valuations to the extent new investors price the pre-IPO financing, and strengthens the company’s balance sheet as it prepares for the IPO process.

● Favorable IPO market conditions. While capital markets volatility and the overall market environment may preclude our portfolio companies from completing an IPO and impede our exit from these investments, the U.S. IPO market in 2013 was the best year since 2000, when 406 IPOs were completed. In 2013, a total of 222 companies completed IPOs in U.S., compared to a total of 128 IPOs completed in 2012. The 222 IPOs completed in 2013 exceeded the 216 IPOs completed in 2004, the highest level of completed IPOs in the last 10 years. During the second quarter of 2014, 83 companies completed IPOs, the highest number of IPOs in any quarter since 2000 and the end of the tech bubble. We believe there are three primary technical drivers that determine the overall number of completed IPOs: (i) volatility, (ii) recent IPO performance, and (iii) equity market trends. As of the end of the second quarter of 2014, we believe that each of the technical indicators were at favorable levels.

● Non-controlling investment structure. We believe we can be a provider of choice for pre-IPO financing. Since we do not require board seats, observation rights, or other control provisions, we allow the current management and board to remain focused on executing the company’s business strategy. In addition to participating in financings led by other investors, we are able to act as a lead investor, in which case we would establish the price and other terms on our own behalf and on behalf of other investors. We believe that our willingness to lead an investment round may be attractive to certain existing venture capital investors, who may wish to avoid conflicts of interest presented by their board seats or other control rights.

We believe our investment adviser has developed a disciplined approach to source qualified pre-IPO investing opportunities from a highly developed network of investors, advisers, and private companies that are deeply involved in later stage venture capital and IPO transactions. We expect that the primary source of our future portfolio company investment opportunities will be from our relationships with venture capital firms and investment banks. Because of our relationships with participants in the later stage venture capital and IPO ecosystems, we believe we have access to a significant number of venture capital-backed companies which are committed to and capable of completing an IPO in the near- or long-term. We regularly monitor the progress of these private company opportunities in order to position us to participate or lead in their future private financing round before an IPO.

We compete for our investments with a large number of venture capital funds, other equity and non-equity based investment funds, investment banks and other sources of financing, including traditional financial services companies such as commercial banks and specialty finance companies. Many of our competitors are substantially larger than us and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. In addition, some of our competitors may require less information than we do and/or have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than we can. Furthermore, many of our competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a business development company and, as a result, such companies may be more successful in completing their investments.

Our Investment Approval Process and Ongoing Portfolio Monitoring

We use a disciplined approach to our initial investment assessment which relies primarily on the detailed financial and business information we receive about the company and our access to and discussions with management, both prior to and after our investment. Our investment adviser uses this company information to prepare our initial valuation analysis, leveraging its experience in taking companies public and its insights on current trends affecting the IPO market. We also use our initial discussions with our portfolio company management teams to discuss their commitment to completing an IPO and to determine which are best positioned to meet or exceed their performance targets following their IPOs and correspondingly achieve a market equity value comparable to their publicly traded peers.

Our investment adviser’s principals have extensive experience negotiating, structuring and closing these specialized equity purchase transactions with issuers and selling stockholders. As part of its due diligence process, our investment adviser analyzes the complex capital structures which venture capital-backed, pre-IPO companies typically possess including multiple classes of common and preferred equity securities with differing rights with respect to voting, dividends, redemptions, liquidation, and conversion rights. Our investment adviser’s principals also have experience in negotiating matters relating to registration rights, restrictions of transfer, and other stockholder rights and restrictions.

We typically do not seek to take a control position in our investments through ownership, board seats, observation rights or other control features. Accordingly, we will typically not be in a position to control the management, operation and strategic decision-making of the companies we invest in. Nevertheless, as part of our portfolio company investment, we typically require information rights that give us access to the company’s quarterly and annual financial statements as well as the company’s annual budget. We also attempt to have dialogue, on at least a quarterly basis, with our private portfolio company management teams to review the company’s business prospects, financial results, and exit strategy plans. We monitor the financial trends of each portfolio company to assess the performance of individual companies as well as to evaluate overall portfolio quality and risk. We believe this is an important competitive advantage for us relative to those funds that do not have or require the same access to ongoing financial information that we insist upon.

We also use our ongoing discussions with our portfolio company management teams to monitor their continued commitment to completing an IPO and, when requested, to provide our insights on the current IPO market and what we believe are the key differentiators for successful IPOs. We also offer significant managerial assistance to our portfolio companies. We expect that this managerial assistance will likely involve consulting and advice on the going public process and public capital markets, including introducing certain portfolio company management teams to capital markets advisory firms that we believe can assist these management teams in: (i) selecting and structuring underwriting syndicates, (ii) developing the portfolio company’s IPO marketing message and plan, (iii) engaging the research analyst community, (iv) developing the appropriate valuation and go-to-market price range and advising on proper transaction size, (v) monitoring the quality of the roadshow audience and maximizing marketing effectiveness, (vi) monitoring bookbuilding and developing strategies for optimal pricing, and (vii) developing an optimal stockholder base and aftermarket trading. As a business development company, we are required to offer such managerial assistance.

Diversification and Follow-on Investments

We generally expect that most of our portfolio company investments will represent approximately 5% of our gross assets measured at the time of investment depending on the size of our asset base and our investable capital. However, based on our investment adviser’s assessment of each portfolio company’s relative quality, fundamentals and valuation, we may make opportunistic portfolio company investments that could represent up to 25% of our gross assets measured at the time of investment. An individual portfolio company investment may be smaller than our targeted size and weighting at the time of the initial investment due to factors such as the size of investment made available to us and our cash available for investment. We expect that the size of our individual portfolio company investments and their weighting in our overall portfolio will fluctuate over time based on a variety of factors including, but not limited to additional follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies, sales of our interests in portfolio companies, unrealized appreciation or depreciation, or an increased asset base as a result of the possible issuance of additional equity.

We may also consider making follow-on investments in an existing private portfolio company that is seeking to raise additional capital in subsequent private equity financing rounds. Existing portfolio companies may elect, or be required, to raise additional capital prior to pursuing an IPO for any number of reasons including: (i) to fund additional spending in marketing and/or research and development to develop their business, (ii) to fund working capital deficiencies due to weaker than expected revenue growth or higher than expected operating expenses, (iii) to fund business acquisitions or strategic joint ventures, and (iv) to increase cash reserves in advance of an anticipated IPO. In evaluating follow-on investment opportunities, we typically assess a number of additional factors beyond the three core investment criteria we use in making our initial investment decisions. These additional factors may include: (i) the portfolio company’s continued commitment to an IPO, (ii) the achievement of pre-IPO milestones since our initial investment, (iii) the size of our portfolio company investment relative to our overall portfolio, (iv) any industry trends affecting the portfolio company or other portfolio investments in similar industries, (v) the impact of a follow-on investment on our diversification requirements so we can continue to qualify as a RIC for tax purposes, and (vi) the possible adverse consequences to our existing investment if we elect not to make a follow-on investment, such as the forced conversion of our preferred stock into common stock at an unfavorable conversion rate and the corresponding loss of any liquidation preferences or other rights and privileges that may be applicable to the securities we currently hold. Although we have de-emphasized the energy and recycling sectors as areas of interest, we may continue to evaluate and make investments in existing energy and recycling portfolio companies based on the foregoing factors.

Targeted Holding Periods

We generally expect that our portfolio companies will be able to complete an IPO, on average, within approximately two years after the closing of our initial investment. After a typical lockup restriction which prohibits us from selling our investment during a customary 180-day period following the IPO, we expect that, on average, the holding period for our portfolio company investments will be approximately four years, compared to private equity and venture capital funds which we believe typically take seven to 10 years. In the venture capital and private equity industries, it is common for a portfolio's return to undergo a so-called "J-curve" pattern. This means that when reflected on a graph, the portfolio’s return would appear in the shape of the letter "J," with low or negative returns in early years and possible investment gains occurring in later years as valuations increase. In the context of the “J-curve” return pattern, our write-downs reflect our unrealized depreciation which may not be reversed on some investments. However, we are unable to reflect the potential value we believe may be realized if or when our private companies progress to and complete an IPO or other exit. This J-curve return pattern results from write-downs of portfolio investments that appear to be unsuccessful, prior to any potential write-ups and realized gains for portfolio investments that may prove to be successful.

While we have only a few discrete events to measure a portfolio company’s progress to an IPO–a registration statement publicly on file with the SEC, the completion of an IPO, and the disposition of our investment–which we refer to as “lagging” indicators, we believe that a number of our portfolio companies continue to prepare for and make progress towards an IPO. Our assessment of a portfolio company’s IPO preparation and progress is based on information our investment adviser may obtain in its quarterly update calls with our portfolio company management teams with respect to certain pre-IPO indicators, or what we refer to as “leading” indicators. These leading indicators include: (i) adding new members of senior management (e.g., a CFO with public company experience), (ii) meeting with investment banking firms and conducting a “bakeoff” to select underwriters, (iii) testing the waters by meeting with prospective institutional IPO investors, (iv) determining (and then achieving) the key operating milestones that need to be met to increase the probability of a successful IPO, (v) holding an IPO “organizational meeting” to begin preparation for the IPO process, (vi) drafting the IPO registration statement, and, in certain cases, (vii) confidentially filing a registration statement with the SEC. Due to the confidential nature of our investment adviser’s discussions with management, we are precluded from discussing the presence or absence of these “leading” indicators with respect to specific portfolio companies.

As of June 30, 2014, 13 of our private portfolio companies have not completed an IPO within our targeted two-year time period from initial investment. In the event our portfolio companies fail to complete an IPO within our targeted two-year time frame, we may need to make additional investments in these portfolio companies, along with other existing investors, to fund their operations. In some cases, if we elect not to fund our pro rata share of these additional investments, there may be adverse consequences including the forced conversion of our preferred stock into common stock at an unfavorable conversion rate and the corresponding loss of any liquidation preferences or other rights and privileges that may be applicable to the securities we currently hold.

Although we have a targeted four-year holding period, our public company ownership structure eliminates the pressure to sell a portfolio company investment if a portfolio company’s IPO or merger/sale is delayed. Accordingly, we believe that we can be a patient investor in our portfolio companies, allowing them flexibility to access the IPO market when the timing and pricing may be best for the company and us. In the event the IPO markets become unfavorable to a specific industry or the broader market, we can be flexible as our portfolio companies wait for a market recovery or seek alternative exit strategies. However, there may be situations where our portfolio companies will not perform as planned and thus be unable to go public under any circumstances. There may also be situations where a specific industry or sector will no longer be attractive to IPO investors.

There also can be no assurances that any of our private portfolio companies will complete an IPO within our targeted two-year time frame, or at all. Even if these portfolio companies are able to complete an IPO, we may not be able to dispose of our interests in these publicly traded portfolio companies within our targeted four-year holding period or at prices that would allow us to achieve our targeted 2x return on our investment, or any return at all. In cases where we have reduced our targeted return due to a shorter expected investment horizon, there can be no assurance that our portfolio company will be able to complete an IPO, or that we will be able to dispose of our investment, in this shorter time frame at our targeted return. There can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve our targeted return on our portfolio company investments if, as and when they go public. Additionally, if our private portfolio companies continue to experience delays in completing an IPO or a strategic sale or merger, our overall holding periods may be longer than our targeted four-year holding period which would adversely affect our portfolio company-level IRR.

Source of Returns

Our primary source of investment return will be generated from net capital gains, if any, realized on the sale of our portfolio company investments, which typically will occur after a portfolio company completes an IPO or, to a lesser extent, is acquired. We are typically prohibited from exiting investments in our publicly traded portfolio companies following their IPO until the expiration of the customary 180-day lockup period. These agreements, which we are usually required to enter into as part of our investment, prohibit us and other significant existing investors from selling stock in the portfolio company or hedging such securities during the customary 180-day period following an IPO. We may sell these securities at our discretion at any time following the lockup period based on our investment adviser’s business judgment. However, we will have no ability to mitigate the high volatility that is a typical characteristic of IPO aftermarket trading and is driven by such factors as overall market conditions, the industry conditions for the particular sector in which the portfolio company operates, the portfolio company’s performance, the relative size of the public float, and the potential selling activities of other pre-IPO investors and possibly management.

Portfolio Company Characteristics and Investment Features

We focus on acquiring equity securities that are typically the issuer’s most senior preferred stock at the time of our investment or, in cases where we acquire common shares, the issuer typically has only common stock outstanding. We may also invest in debt securities including convertible debt, which we refer to as equity-linked securities, issued by a portfolio company typically seeking to raise capital to fund their operations until an IPO, sale/merger or next equity financing event. As of June 30, 2014, our portfolio company investments were composed of investments in the form of preferred stock that is convertible into common stock, common stock, subordinated convertible bridge notes, and warrants exercisable into preferred or common stock. We made our first investments in convertible bridge notes of BrightSource Energy, Inc. and SilkRoad, Inc. in the third quarter of 2013. BrightSource and SilkRoad were both existing portfolio companies. During the first half of 2014, we also invested in the convertible bridge notes of Agilyx Corporation, an existing portfolio company. In connection with the initial closing of SilkRoad’s Series D financing on June 25, 2014, we received shares of Series D-1 convertible preferred stock upon the automatic conversion of the $1,000,000 convertible bridge note that we held in SilkRoad, including PIK interest which was also converted.

Interest accrued under convertible bridge notes does not generate current cash payments to us, nor are the convertible bridge notes held for that purpose. Our convertible bridge notes are generally held for the purpose of potential conversion into equity at a future date. Accordingly, our equity and equity-linked investments are not expected to generate current income (i.e., dividends or interest income), which makes us different from other business development companies that primarily make debt investments from which they receive current yield in the form of interest income.

Our preferred and common stock, warrants, and equity interests are generally non-income producing. Except for our Series F convertible preferred stock investments in Suniva, all convertible preferred stock investments currently held by us carry a non-cumulative, preferred dividend payable only when and if declared by the portfolio company's board of directors. Suniva’s Series F convertible preferred stock carries a cumulative preferred dividend, which is payable only when and if declared by Suniva’s board of directors or upon a qualifying liquidation event. Since no dividends have been declared or paid, or are expected to be declared or paid, with respect to these convertible preferred stock investments, these investments are considered to be non-income producing.

Of the 22 portfolio company investments we have made since inception through June 30, 2014, at the time of our initial investment in these companies, 19 of these initial investments represented the portfolio company’s most senior preferred stock, two of these initial investments represented common shares where the portfolio company had only common stock outstanding, and in one initial investment in common stock which we acquired from the portfolio company’s employees, the company had preferred stock outstanding at the time of our initial investment.

Our portfolio companies are generally permitted to undertake subsequent financings in which they may issue equity securities or incur debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, the equity securities in which we invest. In such cases, debt securities may provide that the holders are entitled to receive payment of interest or principal before we are entitled to receive any distribution from the portfolio companies, and the holders of more senior classes of preferred stock would typically be entitled to receive full or partial payment in preference to any distribution to us. As of June 30, 2014, and as a result of subsequent financings, of our 15 private portfolio companies, we hold the most senior preferred equity in seven of these companies (of which one of our investments has a pari passu preference with a subsequently issued series of preferred stock).

We target our pre-IPO investing activities in later-stage, emerging growth, technology companies. The financing round in which we made our initial investment represented, on average, the portfolio company’s fifth, or Series E, financing round. In addition, we have been the lead investor in seven of our 22 portfolio company investments we have made since inception.

Four of our portfolio companies that we held at June 30, 2014 had 2012 revenue of $100 million or more, and the median company in our portfolio as of June 30, 2014 had 2012 revenue of approximately $58 million. Excluding Millennial Media, eight of our portfolio companies that we held at June 30, 2014 had 2013 revenue of $100 million or more, and the median company in our portfolio as of June 30, 2014 had 2013 revenue of approximately $58 million. The median trailing 12-month revenue for venture capital-backed companies at the time of their IPO was $60 million in the year ended December 31, 2013, $104 million in 2012 and $74 million in 2011. The 2012 and 2013 revenue figures are based on the audited, estimated or unaudited financial results provided to us for the fiscal years ending in 2012 and 2013.

In each of our investments, we may seek to negotiate structural protections such as conversion rights which would result in our receiving shares of common stock at a discount to the IPO price upon conversion at the time of the IPO, or warrants that would result in our receiving additional shares for a nominal exercise price at the time of an IPO. In some circumstances, these structural protections will apply only if the IPO price is below stated levels. In some cases, our decision to pursue an investment opportunity will be dependent on obtaining some structural protections that are expected to enhance our ability to meet our targeted return on the investment. At the time of initial investment, we had negotiated some form of structural protection in 11 of our 22 portfolio company investments we have made since inception through June 30, 2014, which represented an aggregate of $40.5 million in initial investments.

Three portfolio companies in which we had structural protection, NeoPhotonics, LifeLock and Tremor Video, have completed IPOs, one portfolio company in which we had structural protection, Corsair Components, Inc. was sold to a private equity firm, and one portfolio company in which we had structural protection, Jumptap, Inc., completed a merger with Millennial Media, Inc. (NYSE: MM). Of our investments in 15 private portfolio companies as of June 30, 2014, we continue to have some structural protection with respect to investments in five of these portfolio companies, which represented $18.6 million in initial investments. However, there is no assurance that the structural protection in these five investments will remain intact or will not be compromised by either a subsequent financing or sale/merger transaction, or other considerations.

There can be no assurance that our investment adviser will succeed in negotiating structural protections for our future investments. Even if it succeeds in obtaining such protections, our ability to realize the potential value associated with these structural protections at the time of the IPO will depend on a number of factors including each portfolio company’s completion of an IPO, any adjustment to the special IPO conversion price that may be negotiated prior to or during the IPO process, the possible subsequent issuance of more senior securities that may impact the relative value of the structural protection, and fluctuations in the market price of each portfolio company’s common shares until such time as the common shares received upon conversion can be disposed of following the expiration of a customary 180-day post-IPO lockup period. Accordingly, the potential value associated with these structural protections would not be available unless each portfolio company completes an IPO. Further, even if an IPO is completed, the potential value associated with these structural protections would not be realized unless the market price of each portfolio company’s common shares equals or exceeds the IPO price at the time such shares are disposed of following the post-IPO lockup period.

Portfolio Company Exits

While NeoPhotonics and Solazyme were each able to complete their IPOs within approximately one year from the date of our investment, LifeLock was able to complete its IPO within 0.6 years from the date of our investment, Tremor Video was able to complete its IPO within 1.8 years from the date of our investment, and TrueCar was able to complete its IPO within 2.6 years from the date of our investment, a number of our portfolio companies are, on average, taking longer than we initially expected to complete their IPOs. We generally expect that our portfolio companies will be able to complete an IPO, on average, within approximately two years after the closing of our initial investment. After a typical lockup restriction which prohibits us from selling our investment during a customary 180-day period following the IPO, we expect that, on average, the holding period for our portfolio company investments will be approximately four years, compared to private equity and venture capital funds which we believe typically take seven to 10 years. However, as our recent dispositions indicate, there may be instances where we can exit a portfolio company position prior to our anticipated four-year holding period in cases where a portfolio company completes an IPO sooner than we expected.

We also believe that some of our portfolio companies may elect to complete a strategic merger or sale in lieu of an IPO. For instance, Corsair filed a registration statement for an IPO and attempted to complete an IPO, but was eventually sold to a private equity firm in the second quarter of 2013. We were able to fully dispose of our interest in Corsair, which we acquired in July 2011, as part of this sale transaction. In addition, Jumptap, which we acquired in June 2012, completed a merger with Millennial Media, a publicly traded company, on November 6, 2013. At the closing of the merger, in exchange for our Jumptap Series G preferred stock, we received 1,247,893 shares of Millennial Media’s common stock which, at the time of issuance to us, were all subject to lockup restrictions of different durations. In the case of a strategic sale or merger involving one of our portfolio companies, it is possible that we may be able to dispose of our positions before our targeted four-year holding period.

Another private portfolio company, Zoosk, publicly filed its registration statement on April 16, 2014, approximately 2.2 years following our $3 million Series E convertible preferred stock investment.

As of June 30, 2014, the average holding period of our 18 portfolio companies was 2.6 years from our initial investment date, and the weighted-average holding period (based on the investment cost and holding period of each of our portfolio company securities as of June 30, 2014) was 2.3 years. As of June 30, 2014, 13 of our private portfolio companies have not completed an IPO or strategic sale or merger within our targeted two-year time period from initial investment. Accordingly, our overall holding periods may also be longer than our targeted four-year holding period which would tend to correspond with lower internal rates of return (“IRR”) at the portfolio company-level than our investment model expectations.

The following table presents the total invested capital (including any follow-on investments) and the net invested capital (after reduction for any dispositions) of our portfolio company investments since inception, based on the year we made our initial investment in the portfolio company, or the vintage year, as of June 30, 2014. As of June 30, 2014, 85.2% of our $58.3 million of net invested capital was made in the 2011 and 2012 vintage years.

					Dispositions
	Number			Percent of	of Portfolio					Percent of
	of Portfolio	Total		Total	Company			Net		Net
	Company	Invested		Invested	Positions			Invested		Invested
Vintage Year1	Investments	Capital2		Capital	(Cost Basis)			Capital		Capital

2010	4	$	5,686,936	7.9%	$	(3,080,750	)	$	2,606,186	4.5%
Average Investment per Portfolio Company		$	1,421,734
2011	10	$	31,817,904	44.2%	$	(4,000,080	)	$	27,817,824	47.7%
Average Investment per Portfolio Company		$	3,181,790
2012	6	$	28,499,990	39.6%	$	(6,666,664	)	$	21,833,326	37.5%
Average Investment per Portfolio Company		$	4,749,998
2013	1	$	3,000,000	4.2%	$	-		$	3,000,000	5.1%
Average Investment per Portfolio Company		$	3,000,000
2014	1	$	2,999,999	4.2%	$	-		$	2,999,999	5.1%
Average Investment per Portfolio Company		$	2,999,999
Total	22	$	72,004,830	100.0%	$	(13,747,494	)	$	58,257,336	100.0%
Average Investment per Portfolio Company		$	3,272,947


1Vintage year is based on the initial investment date of each portfolio company.
2Includes follow-on investments in a portfolio company that may have been made after the vintage year.

There can be no assurances that any of our private portfolio companies will complete an IPO within our targeted two-year time frame, or at all. Even if these portfolio companies are able to complete an IPO, we may not be able to dispose of our interests in these publicly traded portfolio companies within our targeted four-year holding period or at prices that would allow us to achieve our targeted 2x return on our investment, or any return at all. In cases where we have reduced our targeted return due to a shorter expected investment horizon, there can be no assurance that our portfolio company will be able to complete an IPO, or that we will be able to dispose of our investment, in this shorter time frame at our targeted return. There can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve our targeted return on our portfolio company investments if, as and when they go public.

Net Realized Gains

On February 5, 2014, our lockup restrictions on 415,964 shares of Millennial Media common stock expired and, during the first quarter of 2014, we sold 415,964 shares of Millennial Media common stock with an aggregate cost basis of $1,666,664 for total net proceeds of $2,952,510, resulting in net realized gains of $1,285,846. During the second quarter of 2014, our lockup restrictions on an additional 696,735 shares of Millennial Media common stock expired and, at June 30, 2014, we continued to hold these shares. At the closing of the Millennial Media merger, we were also required to set aside in escrow a total of 135,194 shares of Millennial Media common stock until November 6, 2014 as partial security for potential stockholder indemnification obligations.

As of June 30, 2014, all of the shares we hold in Tremor Video are freely tradable, but all of the shares we hold in TrueCar are still subject to post-IPO lockup restrictions, which will expire on or about November 11, 2014.

The following table summarizes the realized gains and losses from our disposition of portfolio company investments (including the partial sale of our position in Millennial Media) from inception through June 30, 2014 and the related portfolio company returns. Portfolio company returns are calculated at the portfolio company level (net of any selling expenses, including broker commissions); however, the portfolio company returns set forth below do not reflect any of our operating expenses.

	Quarter of	Weighted
	Complete	Average						Total	Total	Internal
Portfolio	Disposition of	Holding Period	Investment		Realized			Return	Rate of	Rate of
Company	Interest	(Years)1	Amount		Gain (Loss)			Multiple2	Return3	Return (IRR)4

Millennial Media, Inc.	n/a	1.6	$	1,666,664	$	1,285,846		1.77x	77%	43%

Corsair Components, Inc.	Q2 2013	1.8	$	4,000,080	$	675,317		1.17x	17%	9%

LifeLock, Inc.	Q2 2013	1.1	$	5,000,000	$	3,675,041		1.74x	74%	66%

Solazyme, Inc.	Q2 2013	1.8	$	2,080,750	$	453,452		1.22x	22%	12%

NeoPhotonics Corp.	Q3 2012	2.6	$	1,000,000	$	(121,428	)	0.88x	-12%	-5%

Total		1.6	$	13,747,493	$	5,968,227		1.43x	43%	24%
								Weighted-Average Return Multiple and Rates of Return

1The weighted-average holding period is calculated based on the total investment amount and holding period of each disposition of shares.

2Total return multiple on a portfolio company investment is determined by dividing the net proceeds realized from the disposition of such investment by the aggregate cost of such investment. The weighted-average total return multiple is determined by dividing the aggregate net proceeds from the disposition of all disposed portfolio companies by the aggregate investment cost of all disposed portfolio companies.

3Total rate of return on a portfolio company investment is determined by dividing the net gain or loss realized from the disposition of such investment by the aggregate cost of such investment. The total rate of return is not annualized. The weighted-average total rate of return is determined by dividing the aggregate net gains and losses realized from the disposition of all disposed portfolio company investments by the aggregate cost of all disposed portfolio company investments. The weighted-average total rate of return is not annualized.

4Internal rate of return is the annualized rate of return on a portfolio company investment taking into account the amount and timing of all cash flows related to such portfolio company investment including the initial investment, any follow-on investment and the net proceeds from the disposition of such investment. The weighted-average internal rate of return is the annualized rate of return on all disposed portfolio company investments taking into account the amount and timing of the cash flows related to all disposed portfolio company investments (as a group).

These returns represent historical results. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Distributions

Dividend History

Distributions to our stockholders are payable only when and as declared by our Board of Directors and are paid out of assets legally available for distribution. All distributions are paid at the discretion of our Board of Directors. Since our portfolio company investments will typically not generate current income (i.e., dividends or interest income), we do not typically expect to generate net ordinary income from which we could make distributions to our stockholders. The amount of distributions will also depend on our financial condition, maintenance of our RIC status, corporate-level income and excise tax planning, compliance with applicable business development company regulations and such other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant from time to time.

The following table summarizes our dividends declared for the first half of 2014 and the years 2011, 2012 and 2013:

Date Declared	Record Date	Payment Date	Dividend Per Share			Source of Distribution

2014 Dividends:
February 20, 2014	March 6, 2014	April 14, 2014	$	0.10	(1)	Capital Gains / Return of Capital (2)
February 20, 2014	May 8, 2014	June 17, 2014		0.10	(1)	Capital Gains / Return of Capital (2)
Total - 2014 Dividends				0.20

2013 Dividends:
May 28, 2013	June 14, 2013	June 26, 2013		0.24		Capital Gains
May 28, 2013	September 13, 2013	September 25, 2013		0.24		Capital Gains
December 19, 2013	December 30, 2013	January 13, 2014		0.01		Capital Gains (3)
Total - 2013 Dividends				0.49

2012 Dividends:
December 6, 2012	December 14, 2012	December 26, 2012		0.03		Capital Gains
Total - 2012 Dividends				0.03

2011 Dividends:
February 11, 2011	February 15, 2011	February 17, 2011		0.13		Return of Capital (4)
Total - 2011 Dividends				0.13

Total - Cumulative			$	0.85

(1)	This dividend was paid in cash and shares of our common stock. Please see the discussion immediately following this table for more detail about the composition of this dividend.

(2)	The determination of the tax attributes of the 2014 dividends will be made as of the end of 2014 based upon our net realized gains for the full year and distributions paid for the full year. Therefore, a determination made on a quarterly basis may not be representative of the actual tax attributes of 2014 dividends for a full year. If we determined the tax attributes of our first and second quarter 2014 dividends as of June 30, 2014, 67% of such dividends would be from long-term capital gains and 33% of such dividends would be a return of capital.

(3)	Although the dividend of $0.01 per share was paid on January 13, 2014, this dividend was taxable to stockholders as if paid in 2013. For income and excise tax purposes, this dividend was eligible for the dividends paid deduction by us in 2013.

(4)	The February 2011 distribution was a special cash distribution based on the unrealized appreciation we had recorded on our NeoPhotonics investment at the time of the distribution, following NeoPhotonics’ completion of its IPO.

On February 20, 2014, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.10 per share payable on April 14, 2014 and June 17, 2014, to common stockholders of record on March 6, 2014 and May 8, 2014, respectively. Stockholders had the option to receive payment of these dividends in cash or in shares of our common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all stockholders for each dividend was limited to 25% of the aggregate dividend amount.

The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion of the April 14, 2014 dividend was calculated based on a price of $6.0103 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of our common stock on April 7, 8 and 9, 2014, and which represented a 18.1% discount to our net asset value (“NAV”) of $7.34 as of March 31, 2014.

The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion of the June 17, 2014 dividend was calculated based on a price of $6.1169 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of our common stock on June 10, 11 and 12, 2014, and which represented a 16.7% discount to our NAV of $7.34 as of March 31, 2014. See “—Stock Distributions” below.

Quarterly Distribution Policy

On February 20, 2014, our Board of Directors adopted a quarterly distribution policy where we intend to pay regular quarterly distributions to our stockholders based on our estimated net capital gains (which are defined as our realized capital gains in excess of realized capital losses during the year, without regard to the long-term or short-term character of such gains or losses) for the year. Our Board of Directors also determined that it intends to pay the regular quarterly distributions under our quarterly distribution policy in cash or shares of our common stock at the election of stockholders, subject to a limitation that no more than 25% of the aggregate distribution will be paid in cash with the remainder paid in shares of our common stock.

In accordance with our quarterly distribution policy, on February 20, 2014, our Board of Directors also declared a regular distribution for the third quarter of 2014 in the amount of $0.10 per share. The record and payment dates for this distribution are as follows:

Regular Dividend		Amount per Share		Record Date		Payment Date
Third Quarter		$0.10		August 11, 2014		September 18, 2014

This quarterly distribution will be paid in cash or shares of our common stock at the election of stockholders, subject to a limitation that no more than 25% of the aggregate distribution will be paid in cash with the remainder paid in shares of our common stock.

Since our portfolio company investments typically do not generate current income (i.e., dividends or interest income), we do not expect the quarterly distributions to represent earnings from net investment income, which makes us different from other business development companies that primarily make debt investments and may pay dividends from their recurring interest income.

Under our quarterly distribution policy, we seek to maintain a consistent distribution level that may be paid in part or in full from net capital gains or a return of capital, or a combination thereof. If our actual net capital gains are less than the total amount of our regular quarterly distributions for the year, the difference will be distributed from our capital and will constitute a return of capital to our stockholders. Alternatively, if our actual net capital gains exceed the total amount of our regular quarterly distributions for a given year, our Board of Directors currently intends to adjust or make an additional distribution in December of each year so that our total distributions for any given year represent 100% of our actual net capital gains in that year. A return of capital is generally not taxable and, instead, reduces a stockholder's tax basis in his shares of our stock. A return of capital does also not necessarily reflect our investment performance and generally does not reflect income earned. The tax character of a distribution is determined based upon our total net capital gains and distributions made with respect to a taxable year and, therefore, cannot be finally determined until after the close of the relevant taxable year.

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we had net realized gains of $1,285,846 resulting from the partial sale of our position in Millennial Media common stock. Our first and second quarter 2014 dividends, both of which were paid in the second quarter of 2014, totaled $1,921,696. We determine the tax attributes of our distributions as of the end of the calendar year based upon our net realized gains for the full year and distributions paid during the full year. Therefore, a determination of tax attributes made on a quarterly basis may not be representative of the actual tax attributes of distributions for a full year. If we determined the tax attributes of our first and second quarter 2014 distribution as of June 30, 2014, since we have made distributions to stockholders in excess of our net realized gains, 67% of the total distribution, or $1,285,846, would be from long-term realized gains, none of the total distribution would be from ordinary income, and 33% of the total distribution, or $635,850, would be a return of capital.

Section 19 of the 1940 Act requires us to accompany each distribution payment with a notice if any part of that payment is from a source other than ordinary income. This Section 19(a) notice is not for tax reporting purposes and is provided for informational purposes. The Section 19(a) notice provides details on the anticipated source(s) of our distributions and will be posted to our website and to the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation so that brokers can distribute such notices. The amounts and sources of distributions reported in Section 19(a) notices are only estimates and the actual amounts and sources of the amounts for tax reporting purposes will depend upon our investment experience during the year and may be subject to changes based on tax regulations. Distributions in excess of our accumulated earnings and profits would generally be treated first as a return of capital to the extent of the stockholder’s tax basis, and any remaining distributions would be treated as a capital gain. We, or the applicable withholding agent, will send stockholders a Form 1099-DIV for the calendar years that will report to stockholders the tax characterization of these distributions for federal income tax purposes.

The quarterly distribution policy reflects our commitment to stockholders to provide a predictable, but not assured, level of quarterly distributions based on the estimated amount of net capital gains we project to realize during the year. Due to the uncertainty of our portfolio companies achieving a liquidity event through either an IPO or sale/merger and our ability to sell our positions at a gain following a liquidity event, we can give no assurance that we will be able to realize net capital gains during the year equal to the amount of our regular quarterly distributions. Furthermore, we can give no assurance that we will achieve our projected investment results that will allow us to pay a specified level of distributions, previously projected distributions for future periods, or year-to-year increases in distributions. Our ability to pay distributions will be based on our ability to invest our capital in securities of suitable portfolio companies in a timely manner, our portfolio companies achieving a liquidity event, and our ability to sell our publicly traded portfolio positions at a gain. There is no assurance that our portfolio companies will complete an IPO, sale/merger or other liquidity event or that we will be able to realize any net capital gains from the sale of our publicly traded portfolio company investments. Accordingly, no assurances can be made that we will make distributions to our stockholders in the future.

Since distributions under our quarterly distribution policy are intended to be made from our net capital gains or, if necessary, represent a return of capital, stockholders should not draw any conclusions about our investment performance from the amount of our quarterly distributions or the terms of our quarterly distribution policy. Our total return in relation to changes in our net asset value and our stock price is presented in the Financial Highlights.

Our Board of Directors may amend or terminate the quarterly distribution policy at any time.

Stock Distributions

On February 20, 2014, consistent with applicable tax rules, our Board of Directors determined that it intends to pay the regular quarterly distributions under our quarterly distribution policy in cash or our common stock at the election of stockholders, subject to a limitation that no more than 25% of the aggregate distribution will be paid in cash with the remainder paid in shares of our common stock. As a result of our stock distributions, you may be required to pay tax in excess of the cash portion of the dividend you receive. Under certain applicable provisions of the Code and the Treasury regulations, distributions payable in cash or in shares of stock at the election of stockholders are treated as taxable dividends. The Internal Revenue Service has issued private rulings indicating that this rule will apply even where the total amount of cash that may be distributed is limited to no more than 20% of the total distribution. Under these rulings, up to 80% of any taxable dividend declared by us could be payable in our stock. If too many stockholders elect to receive their distributions in cash, each such stockholder would receive a pro rata share of the total cash to be distributed and would receive the remainder of their distribution in shares of stock. For any distributions consistent with these rulings that are payable in part in our stock, taxable stockholders receiving such dividends will be required to include the full amount of the dividend (whether received in cash, our stock, or a combination thereof) as ordinary income (or as long-term capital gain to the extent such distribution is properly reported as a capital gain dividend) to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits for United States federal income tax purposes. As a result, a U.S. stockholder may be required to pay tax with respect to such dividends in excess of any cash received. If a U.S. stockholder sells the stock it receives as a dividend in order to pay this tax, the sales proceeds may be less than the amount included in income with respect to the dividend, depending on the market price of our stock at the time of the sale. Furthermore, with respect to non-U.S. stockholders, we may be required to withhold U.S. tax with respect to such dividends, including in respect of all or a portion of such dividend that is payable in stock. In addition, if a significant number of our stockholders determine to sell shares of our stock in order to pay taxes owed on dividends, it may put downward pressure on the trading price of our stock.

Our Board believes there are a number of benefits from paying stock distributions and retaining cash for additional portfolio company investments, including the following: (i) that our increased cash resources would allow us to make investments in a greater number of portfolio companies at potentially larger investment amounts, (ii) that our increased capital base would have the effect of reducing our operating expenses as a percent of our net assets, and (iii) that a higher market capitalization and potentially greater liquidity may make our common stock more attractive to investors and help reduce or eliminate our stock price discount to net asset value over time. Based on our current stock price, we expect that stock distributions for the foreseeable future will be made at a price per share that is less than our net asset value per share, which will result in an immediate dilution of net asset value per share for all of our stockholders. We expect to continue to pay a portion of our distributions in shares of our common stock until such time as we have eliminated our stock price discount to net asset value and can successfully access the equity capital markets, or on an ongoing basis.

For the six months ended June 30, 2014, the dilutive effect of issuing shares of our common stock below net asset value per share in connection with the payment of our first and second quarter 2014 stock dividend distributions was $0.04 per share. This was the result of issuing a total of 237,699 shares in stock dividend distributions during the six months ended June 30, 2014 at an average discount of 17.4% to our NAV of $7.34 as of March 31, 2014.

Dividend Reinvestment Plan

We maintain a dividend reinvestment plan (“DRIP”) that provides for the reinvestment of dividends on behalf of our stockholders, unless a stockholder has elected to receive dividends in cash. As a result, if we declare a dividend, stockholders who have not “opted out” of the DRIP by the dividend record date will have their dividend automatically reinvested into additional shares of our common stock. Although we have a number of options to satisfy the share requirements of the DRIP, we currently expect that the shares required to be purchased under the DRIP will be acquired through open market purchases of common stock by the DRIP administrator. The shares purchased in the open market to satisfy the DRIP requirements will be valued based upon the average price of the applicable shares purchased by the DRIP administrator. We have suspended, and intend in the future to suspend, our DRIP with respect to the entirety of any distribution which is paid in cash and shares of our common stock at the election of stockholders.

Stock Repurchases

On May 9, 2012, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $5 million for a period of six months, which was subsequently extended until May 8, 2013. On April 25, 2013, our Board of Directors further extended the stock repurchase program until November 8, 2013. On October 24, 2013, our Board of Directors discontinued the stock repurchase program in order to make additional capital available for potential new investment opportunities. Since inception of the stock repurchase program, we have repurchased a total of 448,441 shares of common stock, which shares have not been retired or cancelled, remain issued but not outstanding shares, and were held in treasury as of March 31, 2014. We have accounted for the repurchases of our common stock under the cost method, such that repurchased shares were recorded as treasury stock based on the actual cost of the repurchases. We discontinued our stock repurchase program in October 2013.

Business Development Company Industry and Our Equity Focus

Based on our research, as of June 30, 2014, there were 49 publicly traded business development companies (“BDCs”), 45 of which were income oriented, and four of which were focused on capital appreciation. In addition to us, the other BDCs focused on capital appreciation with relatively comparable market capitalizations are Firsthand Technology Value Fund (Nasdaq: SVVC), GSV Capital Corp. (Nasdaq: GSVC) and Harris & Harris Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: TINY). Of the 49 publicly traded BDCs, as of June 27, 2014, the average price/NAV was 99% and the median price/NAV was 97%, and 14 BDCs (or 29%) were either trading at parity or above net asset value (“NAV”). Of the four comparable capital appreciation-focused BDCs including us, the price/NAV ranged from 67% to 88%, with an average price/NAV of 79%, and 83% price/NAV for us, based on a June 27, 2014 closing price of $6.07 and a March 31, 2014 NAV of $7.34. We had a price/NAV of 81% based on our June 30, 2014 closing price and NAV of $5.91 and $7.32, respectively.

Across the entire BDC category as of June 27, 2014, the average dividend yield over the preceding 12 months was 8.3%, and the median yield was 9.4%. We are one of two BDCs among the four comparable ones focused on capital appreciation that paid a distribution to stockholders in the 12 months ended June 30, 2014. As of June 30, 2014, the dividend yield on our common stock for the 12 months ended June 30, 2014 was 7.6%, which is calculated as the total dividends of $0.45 per share declared by us for such period divided by our $5.91 per share closing stock price as of June 30, 2014.

We believe that both individual and institutional investors are willing to accept the risks of investing in BDCs primarily on the expectation of earning attractive yields and acceptable returns on a risk-adjusted basis. Most BDCs invest in fixed income securities that pay current income, resulting in net investment income that is typically passed through to stockholders as a dividend on a quarterly (or in certain cases, monthly) basis and generating a consistent dividend yield. BDCs that are focused on capital appreciation, including us, are designed to generate capital gains based on successful exits of positions in equity securities. Because these equity securities typically do not generate any current income, and the exits are episodic, there is limited consistency or predictability to the pattern of expected distributions to stockholders.

Portfolio Activity and Discount to Net Asset Value

During the three months ended June 30, 2014, we did not sell any of our portfolio company positions. As of June 30, 2014, we have disposed of our entire position in three of our five portfolio companies that have completed IPOs. We also own shares of common stock of Millennial Media, a publicly traded company, as a result of its acquisition of Jumptap in a merger transaction which was completed November 6, 2013.

During the first quarter of 2014, we had net realized gains of $1,285,846 resulting from our sale of 415,964 shares of Millennial Media common stock. During the second quarter of 2014, our lockup restrictions on an additional 696,735 shares of Millennial Media common stock expired and, at June 30, 2014, we continued to hold these shares. At the closing of the Millennial Media merger, we were also required to set aside in escrow a total of 135,194 shares of Millennial Media common stock until November 6, 2014 as partial security for potential stockholder indemnification obligations.

The other two publicly traded companies in our portfolio as of June 30, 2014 are Tremor Video and TrueCar. Tremor Video completed its IPO on June 26, 2013, and the lockup restrictions on our shares of Tremor Video’s common stock expired in late December 2013. We have not sold any of our shares of Tremor Video. TrueCar completed its IPO on May 15, 2014, and the lockup restrictions on our shares of TrueCar’s common stock will expire on or about November 11, 2014. We also sold our entire position in Corsair in connection with Corsair’s sale of a majority interest to a private equity firm.

Approximately 33% of our 22 portfolio company investments since inception (as measured by our cost) have either been sold by us or completed an IPO or merger/sale as of June 30, 2014. However, 13 of our 15 private portfolio companies as of June 30, 2014 have not completed an IPO or a strategic sale or merger within our targeted two-year period from initial investment. Accordingly, despite the relatively robust IPO market over the last 18 months, our portfolio companies are taking a longer time than we initially expected to complete their IPOs or a merger/sale. This may result in our overall holding periods being longer than our targeted four-year holding period, which would tend to correspond with lower portfolio company-level IRR than our investment model expectations. Because of the inherent uncertainty associated with completing IPOs, there is little that we can do to forecast if and when any of our private portfolio companies will be able to successfully complete IPOs, if at all. In addition, we may not be advised by our portfolio companies of specific sale or merger plans and, in the event we are so advised, we are generally prohibited from disclosing such merger or sale plans until they are publicly disclosed by our portfolio company.

We believe a combination of factors has put selling pressure on our stock, including: (i) the fact that, despite the relatively strong recent IPO market, our portfolio companies are taking a longer time than we initially expected to complete their IPOs or a merger/sale, (ii) the fact we have experienced write downs in some of our investments, particularly aggregate net unrealized depreciation of $5.8 million on our energy and recycling-focused portfolio companies, (iii) the fact that we have been unable to generate net realized gains in 2012, 2013 or year-to-date 2014 at levels which exceed our operating expenses for such periods, (iv) with the exception of LifeLock, we have not been able to generate what we believe to be an acceptable portfolio company-level IRR for our investment strategy on our fully disposed positions and, further, the limited number of complete portfolio company dispositions to date has not provided sufficient validation of our investment strategy, and (v) the fact that most of our private companies are under $1 billion in enterprise value and therefore not highly publicized. We believe our private-to-public valuation arbitrage strategy requires further patience in light of the fact that our vintage year 2011 and 2012 portfolio companies, which represent 85.2% of our $58.3 million in net invested capital as of June 30, 2014, continue to make progress towards an IPO or sale/merger, which if they are successful in doing so, would potentially allow us to dispose of these positions, on average, at our targeted 2x return and within our targeted four-year holding period. However, if our private portfolio companies continue to experience delays in completing an IPO or sale/merger, we may be required to hold our positions longer than our targeted four-year holding period which would adversely affect our portfolio company-level IRR.

Our Board of Directors is focused on the current discount between our stock price and net asset value, and we have taken, and continue to take, active steps to try to eliminate this discount to net asset value over time. These steps include an investor relations program and corporate branding campaign designed to increase awareness and visibility for our stock, continuing to present us to the investment community at various investor conferences, and holding one-on-one meetings with institutional investors.

Our investment adviser and our Board of Directors recognize that one of their responsibilities is to enhance stockholder value by consistently growing our net asset value. Based on our current discount to net asset value, our investment adviser and our Board of Directors have been, and will continue to be, committed to instituting programs and policies designed to narrow, or ideally eliminate, any discount to net asset value. In light of the stock price discount to our net asset value of 19% as of June 30, 2014, our Board of Directors has authorized management to assess various programs and policies, and recommend a plan to address this discount. Such plan may include repurchases of our common stock of up to $5.0 million. Repurchases of our common stock would be immediately accretive to our current net asset value. In spite of these efforts, we believe that in order to generate interest among potential investors, we need to achieve the following key milestones: (i) have more companies publicly file registration statements for and complete IPOs, or complete a strategic sale or merger, (ii) complete more sales of our investments at realized gains in line with our targeted 2x return and within our targeted four-year holding period, (iii) continue to distribute these net realized gains to our stockholders in amounts that are comparable to the yield of other BDCs, and (iv) demonstrate, in some manner, that although our portfolio company IPOs and the corresponding sale of our investments are episodic and unpredictable, that the overall return potential of our stock is sufficiently attractive on a risk-adjusted basis to warrant an investment in our stock.

Current Business Environment

Capital markets volatility and the overall market environment may preclude our portfolio companies from completing an IPO and impede our exit from these investments. Since 1998, the number of venture capital-backed companies that have been able to complete IPOs has fallen, while the median time from initial funding to IPO completion has risen.

In the second quarter of 2014, there were 83 IPOs priced in the U.S. that raised an aggregate of $20.8 billion in gross proceeds (or a median IPO size of $100 million), compared to 64 IPOs in the first quarter of 2014 that raised an aggregate of $10.6 billion in gross proceeds (or a median IPO size of $91 million) and 61 IPOs in the second quarter of 2013 that raised an aggregate of $13.0 billion in gross proceeds (or a median IPO size of $101 million).

There were 28 venture capital-backed IPOs in the second quarter of 2014 that raised an aggregate of $4.4 billion in gross proceeds (or an average of $157 million), compared to 40 venture capital-backed IPOs in the first quarter of 2014 that raised an aggregate of $3.2 billion in gross proceeds (or an average of $80 million). Venture capital-backed IPO activity in the second quarter of 2014 was up from the second quarter of 2013 when 22 venture capital-backed IPOs were completed raising an aggregate of $2.1 billion in gross proceeds for an average of $95 million.

The U.S. IPO market in 2013 was the best year since 2000, when 406 IPOs were completed. In 2013, a total of 222 companies completed IPOs in U.S., compared to a total of 128 IPOs completed in all of 2012. The 222 IPOs completed in 2013 exceeded the 216 IPOs completed in 2004, the highest level of completed IPOs in the last 10 years. These positive trends in the U.S. IPO market have continued in the second quarter of 2014 with 83 companies completing IPOs, the highest number of IPOs in any quarter since 2000 and the end of the tech bubble.

We believe there are three primary technical drivers that determine the overall number of completed IPOs: (i) volatility, (ii) recent IPO performance, and (iii) equity market trends. There is typically a strong inverse relationship between volatility and the number of IPO pricings. IPO market expansion has historically taken place in modest volatility environments, where the CBOE Volatility Index (or “VIX Index”) has been in the range of 10.0 to 20.0. By contrast, there are typically strong positive relationships between both recent IPO performance and equity market trends and the number of IPO pricings.

As of June 30, 2014, the VIX Index closed at 11.6, with a high and low during the three months ended June 30, 2014 of 17.0 and 10.6, respectively. The average daily VIX Index closing value for the three months ended June 30, 2014 was 12.7, and the 10-year average (2003-13) was 20.3. For the three months ended June 30, 2014, the average U.S. IPO return was 21.7%, compared to a return of 4.7% for the S&P 500 for the same period. As of the end of the second quarter of 2014, all of the technical indicators that we believe drive IPO issuance activity were at favorable levels.

Portfolio Composition

The total value of our investments in 18 portfolio companies was $64.3 million at June 30, 2014, compared to $57.7 million at March 31, 2013 in 17 portfolio companies. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, our investment activity included the following:

● We invested a total of $199,414 in the second and third first tranche closings of subordinated convertible bridge notes of Agilyx Corporation (“Agilyx”).

● We invested $999,997 in the Series F convertible preferred stock financing of Stoke, Inc. (“Stoke”), an existing portfolio company.

● We invested $2,999,999 in the Series E convertible preferred stock financing of Centrify Corporation (“Centrify”), a new portfolio company.

● We invested $54,280 in the Series F convertible preferred stock financing of Suniva, Inc. (“Suniva”), an existing portfolio company.

As of June 30, 2014, we were fully invested other than for possible follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies and, unless we are able to raise additional capital or we have realizations on our existing investments, we have limited capital to make additional portfolio company investments.

Our investments in portfolio companies consist of securities issued by private and publicly traded companies consisting of convertible preferred stock, common stock, subordinated convertible bridge notes, and warrants to purchase common and preferred stock. The following table summarizes the composition of our portfolio company investments by type of security at cost and value as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.


	June 30, 2014							December 31, 2013
					Percentage							Percentage
Investment Type	Cost		Fair Value		of Portfolio			Cost		Fair Value		of Portfolio

Private Portfolio Companies:
Preferred Stock	$	41,509,239	$	46,241,789		71.89	%	$	35,858,933	$	42,210,000		68.11	%
Preferred Stock Warrants		1,487,902		1,170,000		1.82	%		-		230,000		0.37	%
Common Stock		3,847,389		2,718,210		4.23	%		8,862,385		5,370,000		8.67	%
Common Stock Warrants		610,860		1,480,000		2.30	%		610,860		1,370,000		2.21	%
Subordinated Convertible Bridge Notes		558,219		775,604		1.21	%		1,242,569		1,242,569		2.00	%

Subtotal - Private Portfolio Companies		48,013,609		52,385,603		81.45	%		46,574,747		50,422,569		81.36	%

Publicly Traded Portfolio Companies:
Common Stock		10,333,329		11,935,475		18.55	%		8,999,996		11,554,236		18.64	%

Total - Private and Publicly Traded Portfolio Companies	$	58,346,938	$	64,321,078		100.00	%	$	55,574,743	$	61,976,805		100.00	%

See the Schedules of Investments in our financial statements for additional information regarding industry and headquarter locations of our portfolio companies.

The following table summarizes the net realized gains and net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 for: (i) our portfolio company investments sold during each period, and (ii) our portfolio company investments held at the end of each period.


	Three Months Ended									Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2014				June 30, 2013					June 30, 2014					June 30, 2013
Portfolio Companies	Net Realized Gains		Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)		Net Realized Gains		Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)			Net Realized Gains		Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)			Net Realized Gains		Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)

Portfolio Company Investments Sold During Period
Corsair Components, Inc.	$	-	$	-	$	675,317	$	(991,920	)	$	-	$	-		$	675,317	$	(1,599,920	)
LifeLock, Inc.		-		-		3,675,041		(4,095,660	)		-		-			3,675,041		(1,911,002	)
Solazyme, Inc.		-		-		49,820		351,331			-		-			49,820		342,456
Millennial Media, Inc.		-		-		-		-			1,285,846		(1,024,748	)		-		-

Subtotal - Portfolio Company Investments Sold During Period	$	-	$	-	$	4,400,178	$	(4,736,249	)	$	1,285,846	$	(1,024,748	)	$	4,400,178	$	(3,168,466	)

Portfolio Company Investments Held at End of Period		-		2,324,516		-		1,670,692			-		596,826			-		1,359,986

Total - All Portfolio Companies	$	-	$	2,324,516	$	4,400,178	$	(3,065,557	)	$	1,285,846	$	(427,922	)	$	4,400,178	$	(1,808,480	)

As of June 30, 2014, the cost, fair value and unrealized appreciation (or write-up) of each of our portfolio companies held at June 30, 2014 is set forth below.

	June 30, 2014

							Write-Up
Portfolio Company	Cost		Fair Value		Write-Ups		as % of Cost

Xtime, Inc.	$	3,000,000	$	6,650,000	$	3,650,000		122	%
SilkRoad, Inc.		6,068,932		8,670,000		2,601,068		43	%
Metabolon, Inc.		4,000,000		6,140,000		2,140,000		54	%
TrueCar, Inc.		2,999,996		5,019,616		2,019,620		67	%
Zoosk, Inc.		2,999,999		4,480,000		1,480,001		49	%
Deem, Inc.		3,000,000		4,440,000		1,440,000		48	%
Millennial Media, Inc.		3,333,332		4,083,864		750,532		23	%
Mode Media Corporation		4,999,999		5,750,000		750,001		15	%
Kabam, Inc.		1,328,860		1,930,000		601,140		45	%
MBA Polymers, Inc.		2,000,000		2,090,000		90,000		5	%
Centrify Corporation		2,999,999		2,999,999		-		0	%

Total	$	36,731,117	$	52,253,479	$	15,522,362		42	%

As of June 30, 2014, the cost, fair value and unrealized depreciation (or write-down) of each of our portfolio companies held at June 30, 2014 is set forth below.

	June 30, 2014

								Write-Down
Portfolio Company	Cost		Fair Value		Write-Downs			as % of Cost

Livescribe, Inc.	$	606,187	$	-	$	(606,187	)		-100	%
Harvest Power, Inc.		2,499,999		1,850,000		(649,999	)		-26	%
Suniva, Inc.		2,554,287		1,550,000		(1,004,287	)		-39	%
Tremor Video, Inc.		4,000,001		2,831,995		(1,168,006	)		-29	%
BrightSource Energy, Inc.		3,122,735		1,635,604		(1,487,131	)		-48	%
Stoke, Inc.		4,499,997		2,650,000		(1,849,997	)		-41	%
Agilyx Corporation		4,332,615		1,550,000		(2,782,615	)		-64	%

Total	$	21,615,821	$	12,067,599	$	(9,548,222	)		-44	%

For additional discussion of the change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on our portfolio company investments during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, see “—Results of Operations” below.

Portfolio Company Description and Update

The following section provides a brief description of each of our portfolio companies as well as a summary of our investment and any recent developments. When we make our investments, the companies are generally still private and the detailed information on these companies is not publicly available. Due to the confidential nature of certain information concerning our private portfolio companies, this summary generally does not include detailed business and financial information about each portfolio company.

Tremor Video, Inc. On September 6, 2011, we completed a $4,000,001 investment in the Series F convertible preferred stock of Tremor Video, Inc. (“Tremor Video”). Our investment in Tremor Video was part of a $37 million Series F preferred stock offering. Founded in 2005 and headquartered in New York, New York, Tremor Video is an online video technology and advertising company that provides video advertising solutions to major brand advertisers and publishers of Web videos. On June 26, 2013, Tremor Video priced its IPO at $10.00 per share. The shares of Tremor Video’s common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “TRMR” on June 27, 2013. In connection with Tremor Video’s IPO, the Series F preferred stock we held automatically converted into 599,999 shares of Tremor Video’s common stock, based on an adjusted conversion price of $6.67 per share. The adjusted conversion price was calculated based on our structurally protected appreciation multiple of 1.5x our investment cost. The lockup restrictions on our shares of Tremor Video’s common stock expired in late December 2013. As of June 30, 2014, we continue to hold 599,999 shares of Tremor Video’s common stock.

Millennial Media, Inc. On June 29, 2012, we completed a $4,999,995 investment in the Series G convertible preferred stock of Jumptap, Inc. (“Jumptap”). Our investment in Jumptap was part of a $27.5 million Series G convertible preferred stock offering, in which we were the lead investor. Founded in 2005 and previously headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts, Jumptap is a mobile advertising network and data platform that helps global brands to target, place and track advertising on mobile phones and tablets.

Jumptap was acquired in a merger with Millennial Media, a publicly traded company, on November 6, 2013. At the closing of the merger, in exchange for our Jumptap Series G preferred stock, and based on the Series G liquidation preference of 1.75x our investment cost, we received 1,247,893 shares of Millennial Media’s common stock, which Millennial Media registered for resale under an effective registration statement. On February 5, 2014, the lockup restrictions expired on 415,964 shares of common stock in Millennial Media, which we subsequently sold during the first quarter of 2014. During the second quarter of 2014, our lockup restrictions on an additional 696,735 shares of Millennial Media common stock expired and, at June 30, 2014, we continued to hold these shares. At the closing of the Millennial Media merger, we were also required to set aside in escrow a total of 135,194 shares of Millennial Media common stock until November 6, 2014 as partial security for potential stockholder indemnification obligations.

TrueCar, Inc. On September 26, 2011, we completed a $2,999,996 investment in the common stock of TrueCar, Inc. (“TrueCar”). Our investment in TrueCar was part of a $50 million common stock offering. Subsequent to the initial closing of the common stock offering, TrueCar raised an additional $14 million from other investors from the sale of its common stock on the same price and terms as our investment. Founded in 2005 and based in Santa Monica, California, TrueCar empowers car buyers by giving them transparent insight into what others actually paid, upfront pricing info, a guaranteed savings certificate, and a connection to a trusted TrueCar Certified Dealer to seamlessly complete the car purchase. On November 22, 2013, TrueCar completed a $30 million Series A convertible preferred stock round in which we did not participate.

On May 15, 2014, TrueCar priced its initial public offering of 7,775,000 shares of common stock at a price to the public of $9.00 per share. The shares began trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker symbol "TRUE" on May 16, 2014. Prior to the IPO, TrueCar completed a two-for-three reverse stock split, and we held 377,358 shares of TrueCar’s common stock on a split-adjusted basis at June 30, 2014, which shares are subject to a lockup agreement which expires on or about November 11, 2014.

BrightSource Energy, Inc. On February 28, 2011, we completed a $2,500,006 investment in the Series E convertible preferred stock of BrightSource Energy, Inc. (“BrightSource”), which was part of a $200 million Series E preferred stock offering. BrightSource, headquartered in Oakland, California, is a developer of utility scale solar thermal plants which generate solar energy for utility and industrial companies using its proprietary solar thermal tower technology. On October 24, 2012, BrightSource completed an initial closing of its Series 1 convertible preferred stock financing, in which we invested $397,125 to acquire 26,475 shares of Series 1 preferred stock. Immediately prior to the Series 1 financing, all outstanding shares of preferred stock were automatically converted into common stock on a 1-for-1 basis, after giving effect to a 1-for-3 reverse stock split, which was effected in March 2012. As such, our 288,531 shares of Series E Preferred Stock on a pre-split basis were converted into 96,177 shares of common stock. Because we made our full pro-rata investment in the Series 1 financing, we also received: (i) 2,500,005 shares of Series 1A preferred stock, which have a liquidation preference of $1.00 per share but are subordinate to the most senior liquidation preference of the Series 1 preferred stock, and (ii) 36,795 shares of common stock to compensate existing preferred stock investors for the potential dilutive effect of BrightSource's option pool increase. The Series 1A preferred shares are not convertible into common stock and would be canceled upon an IPO.

On July 10, 2013, we agreed to purchase up to $205,193 of subordinated convertible bridge notes of BrightSource under a $35 million credit facility with existing investors. On July 17, 2013, we purchased $87,940 of convertible notes under a first drawdown of $15 million under the credit facility. On August 14, 2013, we purchased $58,627 of convertible notes under a second drawdown of $10 million under the credit facility. A third and final drawdown of $10 million occurred on October 10, 2013 in which we purchased an additional $58,627 of convertible notes. The notes have payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest which accrues at a rate of 11.5% per annum. Principal and accrued interest is due upon the earlier of July 10, 2014, the closing of a new equity financing of at least $30 million (a “qualified financing”), or a change of control. At the closing of a qualified financing, and with the consent of a majority of the note holders, the notes (including accrued interest) automatically convert, at the holder’s election, into either: (i) shares of Series 1 preferred stock, or (ii) the preferred stock issued in the qualified financing. Existing holders of Series 1 and Series 1A preferred stock who did not participate pro rata in the credit facility had their shares of Series 1 and 1A preferred stock converted into common stock. For each $1 of convertible notes purchased by an investor under the credit facility, the investor had an option to exchange one share of Series 1A preferred stock for 1/15th of a share of Series 1 preferred stock, with the option exercisable for 60 days following each drawdown. Based on the three drawdowns, we exchanged a total of 205,170 shares of Series 1A preferred stock for a total of 13,678 shares of Series 1 preferred stock. Investors purchasing more than their pro rata amount under the credit facility received two-thirds of a share of Series 1 preferred stock for each $1 of oversubscription, with such shares being issued at each drawdown. For our oversubscription in the three drawdowns, we received 8,429 shares of Series 1 preferred stock. On July 10, 2014, a majority of the note holders amended the subordinated convertible bridge notes to extend the maturity date to August 10, 2014.

Livescribe, Inc. On July 1, 2010, we completed a $500,500 investment in the Series C convertible preferred stock and warrants of Livescribe, Inc. (“Livescribe”). Our investment in Livescribe was part of a $39 million Series C preferred stock offering. Livescribe, a private company headquartered in Oakland, California, is a developer and marketer of a mobile, paper-based computing platform consisting of smartpens, dot paper, smartpen applications, accessories, desktop software, an online community and development tools. Subsequent to our initial investment in the Series C convertible preferred stock and warrants of Livescribe, we participated in follow-on investments in Livescribe’s Series C-1 and C-2 preferred stock financings. In November 2012, Livescribe closed on a convertible note financing. Because we did not participate in the convertible note financing: (i) the Series C, C-1 and C-2 preferred stock we held in Livescribe were automatically converted into common stock at an unfavorable rate (one share for each 2.5 conversion shares), and (ii) the Series C and C-1 preferred stock warrants we held in Livescribe were canceled. Concurrent with the convertible note financing, Livescribe completed a 1-for-100 reverse stock split.

MBA Polymers, Inc. On October 15, 2010, we completed a $1,100,000 investment in the Series G convertible preferred stock of MBA Polymers, Inc. (“MBA Polymers”). Our investment in MBA Polymers was part of a $25 million Series G convertible preferred stock offering. On February 22, 2011, we made an additional investment of $900,000 in MBA Polymers’ Series G convertible preferred stock. Our additional investment was part of an aggregate additional Series G preferred stock offering of approximately $15 million. MBA Polymers is a global manufacturer of recycled plastics sourced from end of life durable goods, such as computers, electronics, appliances and automobiles. MBA Polymers recently relocated its corporate headquarters from Richmond, California to the United Kingdom. As part of a closing of convertible bridge note financing with existing investors on December 20, 2013, all series of outstanding preferred stock, other than the Series G convertible preferred stock, were converted into common stock.

Harvest Power, Inc. On March 9, 2011, we completed a $2,499,999 investment in Series B convertible preferred stock of Harvest Power, Inc. (“Harvest Power”). Our investment in Harvest Power was part of a $66 million Series B preferred stock offering. Founded in 2008 and headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts, Harvest Power acquires, owns and operates organic waste facilities that convert organic waste, such as food scraps and yard debris, into compost, mulch and renewable energy. On March 30, 2012, Harvest Power completed the $110 million initial closing of a Series C convertible preferred stock financing from new and existing investors. Harvest Power completed an additional tranche of the Series C round for $15 million in July 2012. As a result of the Series C round, our investment in Harvest Power’s Series B preferred stock does not represent an investment in Harvest Power’s most senior equity securities.

Suniva, Inc. On March 31, 2011, we completed a $2,500,007 investment in the Series D convertible preferred stock of Suniva, Inc. (“Suniva”). Our investment in Suniva was part of a $106 million Series D preferred stock offering. Founded in 2007 and headquartered in Norcross, Georgia, Suniva is a manufacturer of high-efficiency solar photovoltaic cells and modules focused on delivering high-power solar energy products. On December 20, 2012, Suniva completed a Series E convertible preferred stock financing in which we did not participate. As part of the Series E financing, Suniva completed a 1-for-1,000 reverse stock split. On May 2, 2014, Suniva completed an initial closing of a Series F convertible preferred stock financing with existing investors. Existing investors who did not invest their pro rata amount in the Series F financing had their shares of preferred stock converted into common stock. The Series F preferred stock has a senior right and preference (before any other preferred or common stock) to any dividends declared or any distribution of assets in liquidation. After the payment of the Series F dividend or liquidation preference, the holders of Series D and Series E preferred stock have, on an equal priority, pari passu basis, a senior right and preference (before Series A-C preferred stock and common stock) to any dividends declared or any distribution of assets in liquidation. We purchased 10.022 shares of Series F preferred stock, representing our pro rata amount, in the initial closing of the Series F financing for $54,250 cash consideration.

Xtime, Inc. On June 14, 2011, we completed a $3,000,000 investment in an initial closing of the Series F convertible preferred stock of Xtime, Inc. (“Xtime”). Founded in 1999 and headquartered in Redwood Shores, California, Xtime is a software as a service provider of Web scheduling and CRM solutions for automotive service departments. Our investment in Xtime was part of a $5 million Series F preferred stock offering in which we were the lead investor. As part of the final closing in August 2011, we also received warrants to acquire 22,581 shares of Xtime common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share, with the number of warrants being reduced by 50% if Xtime completes a qualifying IPO.

On October 5, 2012, Xtime completed a Series 2 convertible preferred stock financing in which we did not participate. Immediately prior to the closing of the Series 2 financing, all of the existing holders of Xtime’s preferred stock (including the Series F preferred stockholders) converted their existing preferred stock into: (i) newly-created Series 1A and 1B convertible preferred stock, and (ii) warrants to acquire additional shares of Xtime’s common stock which grant the holder the right to acquire additional shares of common stock, calculated at the time of Xtime's IPO based on the actual IPO price, at an exercise price of $0.01 per share (“IPO Warrants”). As a holder of Series F preferred stock, we received one share of Series 1A preferred stock for each share of Series F preferred stock that we held, no shares of Series 1B preferred stock, and IPO Warrants that are exercisable upon Xtime's IPO. Following the Series 2 financing, the holders of Series 2 and Series 1A preferred stock have, on an equal priority, pari passu basis, a senior right and preference (before the Series 1B preferred stock and the common stock) to any dividends declared or any distribution of assets in liquidation.

Metabolon, Inc. On August 25, 2011, we completed a $4,000,000 investment in the Series D convertible preferred stock of Metabolon, Inc. (“Metabolon”). Our investment in Metabolon was part of a $13 million Series D preferred stock offering, in which we were the lead investor. Founded in 2000 and headquartered in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, Metabolon is a molecular diagnostics and services company offering metabolic profiling technology that uses advanced bioinformatics and data analytics software to identify, quantify, and analyze biochemical processes occurring within cells. Metabolon is utilizing biomarkers identified by its technology in the development of molecular diagnostic tests intended to detect and measure the aggression and stage of diseases such as diabetes and cancer. On December 16, 2013, Metabolon completed a $15 million Series E convertible preferred stock round in which we did not participate. The Series E preferred stock has senior dividend and liquidation rights to all other preferred stock.

Kabam, Inc. On August 29, 2011, we completed a $1,328,860 investment in the Series D convertible preferred stock of Kabam, Inc. (“Kabam”). Our investment in Kabam was part of an $86 million Series D preferred stock offering. Founded in 2006 and headquartered in Redwood City, California, Kabam develops and publishes free-to-play core video games on mobile devices and the Internet.

Agilyx Corporation. On December 16, 2011, we completed a $4,000,000 investment in the Series C convertible preferred stock of Agilyx Corporation (“Agilyx”). Our investment in Agilyx was part of a $25 million Series C convertible preferred stock offering, in which we were the lead investor. Founded in 2004 and based in Beaverton, Oregon, Agilyx is an alternative energy company that economically converts difficult-to-recycle waste plastics into high value synthetic oil. On October 9, 2012, Agilyx raised additional funds as part of a Series D convertible preferred stock financing in which we did not participate. As a result of the Series D round, our investment in Agilyx’s Series C preferred stock no longer represents an investment in Agilyx’s most senior equity securities.

During the first half of 2014, we invested a total of $332,356 in three tranche closings of subordinated convertible bridge notes of Agilyx, which represented our pro rata amount of the convertible bridge note financing. All shares of preferred stock were converted into common stock as part of the convertible bridge note financing, however, preferred stockholders who invested their pro rata amount in the convertible bridge note financing exchanged their converted common stock into the same preferred stock previously held.

Zoosk, Inc. On January 27, 2012, we completed a $2,999,999 investment in the Series E convertible preferred stock of Zoosk, Inc. (“Zoosk”). Our investment in Zoosk was part of a $21 million Series E convertible preferred stock offering. Founded in 2007 and headquartered in San Francisco, California, Zoosk operates online dating communities. On April 16, 2014, Zoosk filed a registration statement on Form S-1 for an IPO, which was subsequently amended on May 1, 2014.

SilkRoad, Inc. On March 28, 2012, we made a $3,500,000 investment in the Series C convertible preferred stock of SilkRoad, Inc. (“SilkRoad”). On May 9, 2012, we made an additional investment of $1,500,000 in a second tranche of SilkRoad’s Series C convertible preferred stock financing. SilkRoad raised a total of $35 million in the Series C convertible preferred stock financing from new and existing investors in the initial and second tranches. On July 17, 2012, SilkRoad raised an additional $2.9 million in a third tranche of the Series C round at the same price and on the same terms as our investment. Founded in 2003 and headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, SilkRoad is a global provider of cloud-based talent management software.

On August 21, 2013, we purchased $1,000,000 of subordinated convertible bridge notes of SilkRoad under a $25 million bridge note financing. A total of $15.7 million was raised in the initial closing of the bridge note financing on August 21, 2013. In connection with the initial closing of the Series D financing of SilkRoad on June 25, 2014, we received shares of Series D-1 convertible preferred stock upon the automatic conversion of the $1,000,000 convertible bridge note, including PIK interest which was also converted. As part of the initial closing of this financing, we also received warrants to purchase Series D-1 convertible preferred stock replacing the warrants issued to us in the convertible bridge note financing. Further, as part of the initial closing of the Series D financing, we received shares of Series D-2 convertible stock and Class B Common in exchange for the shares of Series C convertible preferred stock held by us. The Series D-1 preferred stock has a senior liquidation preference (before any other preferred or common stock) to any distribution of assets in liquidation. After the payment of the Series D-1 liquidation preference, the holders of Series D-2 preferred stock have a senior right and preference (before any other series of preferred stock and common stock).

On July 2, 2014, we purchased shares of SilkRoad’s Series D-1 convertible preferred stock for an aggregate purchase price of $268,853 in a subsequent closing of the Series D financing. In connection with our purchase of these shares of Series D-1 convertible preferred stock, we also received shares of Series D-2 convertible preferred stock in exchange for all of the shares of Class B Common Stock that we received in the initial closing of the Series D financing upon the automatic conversion of the convertible bridge notes held by us. See “—Recent Developments” below.

Mode Media Corporation On May 25, 2012, we completed a $4,999,999 investment in the Series F convertible preferred stock of Mode Media Corporation, f/k/a Glam Media, Inc. (“Mode Media”). Our investment in Mode Media was part of a $15 million Series F convertible preferred stock offering, in which we were the lead investor. On May 9, 2013, Mode Media issued $10 million of Series F convertible preferred stock to an existing investor in an additional closing. On March 17, 2014, Mode Media completed a convertible note financing with an existing investor. Founded in 2004 and headquartered in Brisbane, California, Mode Media is an online media and social networking company focused on matching targeted audiences with targeted content through its properties in the lifestyle, entertainment, home, health and wellness, food and parenting categories.

Stoke, Inc. On June 5, 2012, we completed a $3,500,000 investment in the common stock of Stoke, Inc. (“Stoke”). Our investment in Stoke was structured as a secondary purchase of shares of common stock from certain Stoke employees, and we were the sole investor. Our secondary purchase was facilitated by Stoke. Founded in 2004 and headquartered in Santa Clara, California, Stoke is a systems designer and equipment manufacturer for mobile communications infrastructure networks.

On April 30, 2014, we invested $999,997 in the Series F convertible preferred stock financing of Stoke. In connection with the Series F financing, we also exchanged all of the shares of common stock that we held in Stoke for shares of Series F convertible preferred stock. We also received warrants to purchase shares of Series F convertible preferred stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. The Series F preferred stock has a senior liquidation preference (before any other preferred or common stock) to any distribution of assets in liquidation.

Deem, Inc. On September 19, 2013, we completed a $3,000,000 investment in the Series AA-1 convertible preferred stock of Deem, Inc. (“Deem”). Our investment in Deem was part of a closing of the Series AA convertible preferred stock with an aggregate value of $99.8 million, which included the conversion of certain term loans and bridge notes. Deem operates an e-commerce network that connects a large and diverse ecosystem of consumers, businesses, channel partners and merchants.

On May 30, 2014, Deem completed an initial closing of a Series AA-3 convertible preferred stock round (“Series AA-3 Financing”) and a Series BB-1 convertible preferred stock round (“Series BB-1 Financing”). The shares of Series AA-3 and BB-1 preferred stock have a pari passu liquidation preference senior to the Series AA-1 and AA-2 preferred stock.

Centrify Corporation On May 16, 2014, we completed a $3,000,000 investment in the Series E convertible preferred stock of Centrify Corporation (“Centrify”). Our investment in Centrify was part of a $42 million Series E financing. The Series E preferred stock has a liquidation preference pari passu with all other outstanding preferred stock. Founded in 2004 and headquartered in Santa Clara, California, Centrify provides identity management software that allows users to access data center, cloud, and mobile devices and applications with a single sign-on.

Results of Operations

The principal measure of our financial performance is the sum of (i) the net increase (decrease) in our net assets resulting from operations, which includes net investment income (loss), (ii) net realized gain (loss) on investments, and (iii) net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments. Net investment income (loss) is the difference between our income from interest, dividends, fees and other investment income and our operating expenses. Net realized gain (loss), if any, is the difference between the net proceeds from the disposition of portfolio company securities and their stated cost. Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments is the net change in the fair value of our investment portfolio.

Set forth below are the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Comparison of Three Months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

Investment Income. For the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, we earned interest and dividend income from cash and cash equivalents of $602 and $844, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, we also earned PIK interest of $26,373 on our subordinated convertible bridge note investments in BrightSource, SilkRoad and Agilyx. Except as set forth above, we did not earn any other investment income during the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Our preferred and common stock, warrants, and equity interests are generally non-income producing. Although our preferred stock investments typically carry a dividend rate, in some cases with a payment preference over other classes of equity, we do not expect dividends (whether cumulative or non-cumulative) to be declared and paid on our preferred stock investments, or on our common stock investments, since our portfolio companies typically prefer to retain profits, if any, in their businesses. Since no dividends have been declared or paid, or are expected to be declared or paid, with respect to these convertible preferred stock investments, these investments are considered to be non-income producing.

Our primary source of investment return will be generated from net capital gains, if any, realized on the sale of our portfolio company investments, which typically will occur after the portfolio company completes an IPO and after the expiration of a customary 180-day post-IPO lockup agreement or, to a lesser extent, is acquired. Sales of our portfolio company investments are discretionary and based on our investment adviser’s business judgment. Since we typically do not expect to generate current income from our portfolio company investments, our operating expenses will be financed from our capital base during periods of time between realizations of capital gains on our investments, if any. Because the equity securities of pre-IPO companies typically do not pay any current income, we may consider investments in qualified private and public companies that generate current yield in the form of interest income which can be used to offset some of our operating expenses. These investments typically will be in the form of debt instruments providing for the current payment of interest, which may be convertible into equity securities or have separate warrants exercisable for equity securities so that we have an opportunity to achieve long-term capital appreciation.

To maintain our status as a RIC, PIK interest, which is a non-cash source of income, must generally be distributed to stockholders at least annually from other sources such as available cash or the proceeds from the disposition of our portfolio company investments. However, since we do not expect to have investment company taxable income, we would generally not be required to distribute PIK interest from our available cash or the proceeds from the disposition of our portfolio company investments.

The following table shows our PIK loan activity for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, at cost:

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2014			2013

Beginning PIK loan balance (inclusive of $63,229 of PIK interest)	$	1,401,363		$	-
Addition of PIK loans during period		199,415			-
PIK interest accreted to principal during period		26,373			-
Conversion of PIK loans into equity during the period (inclusive of $68,932 of PIK interest)		(1,068,932	)		-
Payments received from PIK loans during the period		-			-
Ending PIK loan balance (inclusive of $20,670 of PIK interest)	$	558,219		$	-

During the three months ended June 30, 2014, we invested in the subordinated convertible bridge notes of Agilyx, an existing portfolio company, and we received shares of SilkRoad’s Series D-1 convertible preferred stock upon the automatic conversion of the $1,000,000 convertible bridge note issued to us by SilkRoad, including PIK interest of $68,932 which was also converted.

The PIK interest is computed at the contractual rate specified in each note and is added to the principal balance of the note and recorded as interest income as earned. As of June 30, 2014, we were accruing PIK interest on each of our subordinated convertible bridge notes, and none of our subordinated convertible bridge notes were on non-accrual status.

Operating Expenses. Our primary operating expenses include the payment of: (i) investment advisory fees to our investment adviser, (ii) our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by our investment adviser, as our administrator, in performing its administrative obligations under the Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement, and (iii) other operating costs, including those listed below, to the extent such costs are not capitalized for accounting purposes.

Our investment advisory fee compensates our investment adviser for its work in identifying, evaluating, negotiating, closing, monitoring and servicing our investments. See “Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement” below. We bear all other costs and expenses of our operations and transactions, including, without limitation:

●

Costs of calculating our net asset value, including the cost of any third-party valuation services;


	●	Costs of effecting sales and repurchases of shares of our common stock and other securities;

	●	Fees payable to third parties relating to, or associated with, making investments, including fees and expenses associated with performing due diligence reviews of prospective investments;

	●	Costs related to organization and offerings;

	●	Transfer agent and custodial fees;

	●	Fees and expenses associated with marketing efforts;

	●	Federal and state registration fees;

	●	Any stock exchange listing fees;

	●	Applicable federal, state and local taxes;

	●	Independent directors’ fees and expenses;

	●	Brokerage commissions;

	●	Costs of proxy statements, stockholders’ reports and notices;

	●	Public and investor relations expenses (including marketing and brand awareness campaign expenses);

	●	Fidelity bond, directors and officers/errors and omissions liability insurance and other insurance premiums;

	●	Direct costs such as printing, mailing, and long distance telephone;

	●	Fees and expenses associated with independent audits and outside legal costs;

	●	Costs associated with our reporting and compliance obligations under the 1940 Act, Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and applicable federal and state securities laws; and

	●	All other expenses incurred by either our investment adviser or us in connection with administering our business, including payments under the Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement that will be based upon our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by our investment adviser in performing its obligations under the Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement, including our allocable portion of the compensation of our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Compliance Officer, and their respective staff.

Operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were $1,230,863 and $1,326,310, respectively, a decrease of $95,477 compared to the prior period. A summary of the items comprising the decrease in our operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013 is set forth in the table below.

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,		Increase /
	2014		2013		(Decrease)
Operating Expenses
Base management fees	$	368,542	$	368,882	$	(340	)
Incentive fees		464,904		266,924		197,980
Administrative expenses allocated from investment adviser		163,541		162,517		1,024
Legal and professional fees		24,623		289,485		(264,862	)
Directors fees		25,000		40,000		(15,000	)
Stock transfer agent fees		13,052		12,735		317
Custody fees		1,500		1,500		-
Public and investor relations expenses		39,632		2,156		37,476
Marketing and advertising expenses		11,450		5,416		6,034
Printing and production expenses		18,154		7,523		10,631
Postage and fulfillment expenses		13,620		8,060		5,560
Travel expenses		22,494		20,552		1,942
General and administrative expenses		64,351		140,560		(76,209	)

Total Operating Expenses	$	1,230,863	$	1,326,310	$	(95,447	)

As part of the Transaction, BDCA Adviser agreed to reimburse us at closing for the costs incurred in connection with our 2014 annual stockholder meeting, including legal and accounting fees and proxy solicitation costs, which related to obtaining stockholder approval of the New Advisory Agreement, which costs would not otherwise have been incurred by us. As of June 30, 2014, BDCA Adviser had agreed to reimburse us for such costs in the amount of $97,866. Accordingly, we recorded this amount as a receivable due from a related party as of June 30, 2014. BDCA Adviser paid this amount to us at the closing of the Transaction on July 1, 2014.

The decrease of $340 in base management fees for the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013 was the result of a decrease in our gross assets on which the base management fee is calculated.

The increase of $197,980 in incentive fees for the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013 was the result of an increase of $2,324,516 in net unrealized appreciation during the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared to a decrease of $3,065,557 in net unrealized appreciation and $4,400,178 of net realized gain on our portfolio company investments during the three months ended June 30, 2013. See “—Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement” below.

The increase of $1,024 in administrative expenses allocated from our investment adviser for the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily the result of an increase in salary, benefits and other expenses associated with our management and administration which are allocated to us.

The decrease of $264,862 in legal and professional fees for the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily the result of: (i) legal fees of $196,730 and audit fees of $40,000 which were expensed in the three months ended June 30, 2013 in connection with the withdrawal of our registration statement for an underwritten offering, and (ii) decreases in valuation and tax preparation service expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2014.

The decrease of $15,000 in directors’ fees for the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013 was the result of a reduction in the size of our Board of Directors in the second quarter of 2013 and a revised compensation program for our non-interested directors which became effective July 1, 2013.

The increase of $317 in stock transfer agent fees for the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013 was the result of an increase in certain ancillary services during the three months ended June 30, 2014.

The increase of $37,476 in public and investor relations fees during the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily the result of: (i) increases in seminar and conference registration fees during the three months ended June 30, 2014, and (ii) proxy administrative expenses related to our annual meeting of stockholders which were incurred in the second quarter of 2014 compared to the first quarter of 2013 in the prior period.

The increase of $6,034 in marketing and advertising for the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily the result of an increase in spending on web-based and social media advertising under our ongoing corporate branding and awareness campaign and press release issuance costs during the three months ended June 30, 2014.

The increases of $10,631 in printing and production expenses and $5,560 in postage and fulfillment expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013 were primarily the result of printing and delivery costs of our proxy materials which were incurred in the second quarter of 2014 as compared to the first quarter of 2013 in the prior period.

The increase of $1,942 in travel expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily the result of an increase in travel and travel-related expenses related to our participation in investor conferences and meetings with institutional investors during the three months ended June 30, 2014.

The decrease of $76,209 in general and administrative expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily the result of: (i) Edgar filing and printing costs of $50,629 which were expensed in the three months ended June 30, 2013 in connection with the withdrawal of our registration statement for an underwritten offering, and (ii) decreases in director and officer liability insurance premiums, website design improvement costs and subscription fees during the three months ended June 30, 2014, partially offset by increases in computer hardware and software costs during the three months ended June 30, 2014.

We continue to focus on building and enhancing our stockholder communications, investor relations and brand marketing programs which we began prior to the listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market in December 2011. We believe it is important to continue to develop these programs as they will be the foundation of our investor relations initiatives as we anticipate that we will need to access the capital markets at some point in the future to raise additional capital to fund additional portfolio company investments. We have taken, and continue to take, active steps to try to eliminate, over time, the current discount between our stock price and our net asset value. These steps include repurchases under our prior stock repurchase program that were accretive to net asset value, an investor relations program and corporate branding campaign designed to increase awareness and visibility for our stock, continuing to present us to the investment community at various investor conferences, and holding one-on-one meetings with institutional investors. While some of these expenses may be one-time in nature, the majority of these expenses will continue, and may increase over time, as we attempt to develop interest in us and an active trading market for our shares and reduce or eliminate our current discount to net asset value.

Our operating expenses (excluding base management fees, incentive fees, and costs related to our withdrawn registration statement) for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were $397,417 and $403,146, respectively, a decrease of $5,729 compared to the prior period. This decrease was primarily related to decreases in non-offering related general and administrative expenses and legal and professional fees, and directors fees during the three months ended June 30, 2014, which were partially offset by increases in public and investor relations expenses, printing and production expenses marketing and advertising expenses and postage and fulfillment expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2014, as discussed above.. We are currently projecting operating expenses (excluding base management fees, incentive fees, and registration and offering-related costs) for 2014 of about $2.0 million based on our current capital base, which is consistent with approximately $2.1 million for 2013 and 2012.

Net Investment Loss. Net investment losses for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were $1,203,888 and $1,325,466, respectively. The decrease of $121,578 in net investment loss for the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013 is primarily attributable to: (i) legal and professional fees and Edgar filing and printing costs which were expensed in the three months ended June 30, 2013 in connection with the withdrawal of our registration statement for an underwritten offering, and (ii) decreases in non-offering related general and administrative expenses and legal and professional fees, and directors fees, during the three months ended June 30, 2014, which were partially offset by increases in public and investor relations expenses, printing and production expenses marketing and advertising expenses and postage and fulfillment expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2014, as discussed above.

Basic and diluted net investment loss per common share outstanding was $0.12 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to basic and diluted net investment loss per common share outstanding of $0.15 for the three months ended June 30, 2013.

Net Realized Gains on Investments. For the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, net realized gains on investments totaled $0 and $4,400,178, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, we sold our entire positions in Corsair, LifeLock and Solazyme. For additional information regarding the investment cost, net proceeds and realized gains for each of the portfolio company positions sold by us during the three months ended June 30, 2013, see “—Portfolio Composition” above.

Net Increase (Decrease) in Unrealized Appreciation on Investments. For the three months ended June 30, 2014, the net increase in unrealized appreciation on investments totaled $2,324,516. For the three months ended June 30, 2013, the net decrease in unrealized appreciation on investments totaled $3,065,557.

The following table summarizes the cost and fair value of our portfolio company investments as of June 30, 2014 and March 31, 2014, and the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on each individual portfolio company investment comprising the net increase in unrealized appreciation on investments of $2,324,516 for the three months ended June 30, 2014, or $0.24 per common share outstanding during the period.

	June 30, 2014							March 31, 2014										Change In
															Change In			Unrealized
					Unrealized							Unrealized			Unrealized			Appreciation
			Fair		Appreciation					Fair		Appreciation			Appreciation			(Depreciation)
Portfolio Company	Cost		Value		(Depreciation)			Cost		Value		(Depreciation)			(Depreciation)			Per Share1

Xtime, Inc.	$	3,000,000	$	6,650,000	$	3,650,000		$	3,000,000	$	5,950,000	$	2,950,000		$	700,000		$	0.07
SilkRoad, Inc.		6,068,932		8,670,000		2,601,068			6,048,667		8,748,667		2,700,000			(98,932	)		(0.01	)
Metabolon, Inc.		4,000,000		6,140,000		2,140,000			4,000,000		6,140,000		2,140,000			-			-
TrueCar, Inc.		2,999,996		5,019,616		2,019,620			2,999,996		3,720,000		720,004			1,299,616			0.13
Zoosk, Inc.		2,999,999		4,480,000		1,480,001			2,999,999		5,560,000		2,560,001			(1,080,000	)		(0.11	)
Deem, Inc.		3,000,000		4,440,000		1,440,000			3,000,000		3,000,000		-			1,440,000			0.15
Millennial Media, Inc.		3,333,332		4,083,864		750,532			3,333,332		5,066,115		1,732,783			(982,251	)		(0.10	)
Mode Media Corporation		4,999,999		5,750,000		750,001			4,999,999		5,750,000		750,001			-			-
Kabam, Inc.		1,328,860		1,930,000		601,140			1,328,860		1,770,000		441,140			160,000			0.02
MBA Polymers, Inc.		2,000,000		2,090,000		90,000			2,000,000		1,570,000		(430,000	)		520,000			0.05
Centrify Corporation		2,999,999		2,999,999		-			-		-		-			-			-
Livescribe, Inc.		606,187		-		(606,187	)		606,187		-		(606,187	)		-			-
Harvest Power, Inc.		2,499,999		1,850,000		(649,999	)		2,499,999		2,550,000		50,001			(700,000	)		(0.07	)
Suniva, Inc.		2,554,287		1,550,000		(1,004,287	)		2,500,007		1,620,000		(880,007	)		(124,280	)		(0.01	)
Tremor Video, Inc.		4,000,001		2,831,995		(1,168,006	)		4,000,001		2,471,996		(1,528,005	)		359,999			0.04
BrightSource Energy, Inc.		3,122,735		1,635,604		(1,487,131	)		3,116,852		1,779,721		(1,337,131	)		(150,000	)		(0.02	)
Stoke, Inc.		4,499,997		2,650,000		(1,849,997	)		3,500,000		790,000		(2,710,000	)		860,003			0.09
Agilyx Corporation		4,332,615		1,550,000		(2,782,615	)		4,132,976		1,230,000		(2,902,976	)		120,361			0.01

Total	$	58,346,938	$	64,321,078	$	5,974,140		$	54,066,875	$	57,716,499	$	3,649,624		$	2,324,516		$	0.24

* Per share amounts less than $0.01.

1Per share amounts based on weighted-average shares outstanding of 9,669,274 during the three months ended June 30, 2014.

The change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in Tremor Video and Millennial Media, both publicly traded companies, during the three months ended June 30, 2014 reflects the change in market prices for these portfolio companies. The net increase in unrealized appreciation in TrueCar, which completed its IPO on May 15, 2014, during the three months ended June 30, 2014 reflects the change in market price for TrueCar since the IPO and the fair value of this investment as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors as of March 31, 2014.

The change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on our private portfolio company investments during the three months ended June 30, 2014 is based upon the fair value determinations made in good faith by our Board of Directors. The write-up or write-down of specific portfolio company investments can be attributed a variety of reasons, including, without limitation, the following:

	●	A change in the portfolio company’s financial condition or operating performance compared to projections, and any significant changes to the portfolio company’s most recent projections relative to previous projections.

	●	A reduction in our weighting of the precedent transaction value since such value may no longer represent the best indicator of fair value within a range of fair values developed from the various valuation approaches and methods used. Precedent transactions may include the transaction in which we acquired our portfolio company interests, as well as subsequent transactions in the equity of the portfolio company, in which we may or may not have participated.

	●	The establishment of a new precedent transaction value based on a more recent transaction involving the portfolio company’s equity securities, whether or not we participated in such transaction, taking into account the price, rights, preferences and limitations of the equity securities.

	●	A change in the market multiples of the selected comparable public companies or comparable transactions used to value a portfolio company using a market approach and exit multiple in a discounted cash flow method, or income approach, a change in the discount rate used to value a portfolio company using a discounted cash flow method, or income approach, or a change in the valuation metrics such as revenue, EBITDA or net income used in the market and income approaches.

	●	A change in the weightings among the values obtained under the market or income approaches used to determine the marketable equity value of a portfolio company.

	●	A subsequent financing affecting the rights, preferences and limitations of our equity securities.

	●	The use of a cost, or liquidation, approach to value our equity securities in a portfolio company, where recent performance or the uncertainty of obtaining additional financing may indicate the portfolio company’s inability to continue as a going concern.


	●	A change in the weightings among the precedent transaction and various exit scenarios such as IPO, sale/merger, or liquidation in deriving the value of our equity securities in a portfolio company.

	●	A change in the discount for lack of marketability applied to the marketable value of our equity securities under the IPO and sale/merger exits due to a significant change in the time frame in which the portfolio company expects to pursue or complete an IPO or sale/merger.

The following table summarizes the cost and fair value of our portfolio company investments as of June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, and the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on each individual portfolio company investment comprising the net decrease in unrealized appreciation on investments of $3,065,557 for the three months ended June 30, 2013.

	June 30, 2013							March 31, 2013
															Change In
					Unrealized							Unrealized			Unrealized
			Fair		Appreciation					Fair		Appreciation			Appreciation
Portfolio Company	Cost		Value		(Depreciation)			Cost		Value		(Depreciation)			(Depreciation)

Xtime, Inc.	$	3,000,000	$	5,100,000	$	2,100,000		$	3,000,000	$	4,612,167	$	1,612,167		$	487,833
SilkRoad, Inc.		5,000,000		6,680,000		1,680,000			5,000,000		6,630,000		1,630,000			50,000
Harvest Power, Inc.		2,499,999		3,370,000		870,001			2,499,999		3,540,000		1,040,001			(170,000	)
Tremor Video, Inc.		4,000,001		4,859,984		859,983			4,000,001		3,860,000		(140,001	)		999,984
Metabolon, Inc.		4,000,000		4,840,000		840,000			4,000,000		4,710,000		710,000			130,000
TrueCar, Inc.		2,999,996		3,510,000		510,004			2,999,996		2,850,000		(149,996	)		660,000
Zoosk, Inc.		2,999,999		3,510,000		510,001			2,999,999		3,000,000		1			510,000
Glam Media, Inc.		4,999,999		5,430,000		430,001			4,999,999		5,600,000		600,001			(170,000	)
Jumptap, Inc.		4,999,995		5,380,000		380,005			4,999,995		5,320,000		320,005			60,000
Kabam, Inc.		1,328,860		1,420,000		91,140			1,328,860		1,120,000		(208,860	)		300,000
LifeLock, Inc.		-		-		-			5,000,000		9,095,660		4,095,660			(4,095,660	)
Corsair Components, Inc.		-		-		-			4,000,080		4,992,000		991,920			(991,920	)
Solazyme, Inc.		-		-		-			1,505,162		1,153,831		(351,331	)		351,331
Livescribe, Inc.		606,187		-		(606,187	)		606,187		-		(606,187	)		-
MBA Polymers, Inc.		2,000,000		1,340,000		(660,000	)		2,000,000		770,000		(1,230,000	)		570,000
Suniva, Inc.		2,500,007		1,410,000		(1,090,007	)		2,500,007		1,290,000		(1,210,007	)		120,000
BrightSource Energy, Inc.		2,897,131		1,490,000		(1,407,131	)		2,897,131		2,637,125		(260,006	)		(1,147,125	)
Agilyx Corporation		4,000,000		2,490,000		(1,510,000	)		4,000,000		2,350,000		(1,650,000	)		140,000
Stoke, Inc.		3,500,000		1,880,000		(1,620,000	)		3,500,000		2,750,000		(750,000	)		(870,000	)

Total	$	51,332,174	$	52,709,984	$	1,377,810		$	61,837,416	$	66,280,783	$	4,443,367		$	(3,065,557	)

The net decrease in unrealized appreciation on investments of $3,065,557 for the three months ended June 30, 2013, or $0.34 per common share outstanding during the period, was comprised of: (i) a net decrease in unrealized appreciation of $4,736,249 on Corsair, Solazyme and LifeLock, which we disposed of during the second quarter of 2013, partially offset by (ii) a net increase in unrealized appreciation of $1,670,692 on our portfolio company investments held at June 30, 2013. See “—Portfolio Composition” above.

The change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on our private portfolio company investments during the three months ended June 30, 2013 is based upon the fair value determinations made in good faith by our Board of Directors. The write-up or write-down of specific portfolio company investments can be attributed a variety of reasons, including without limitation those set forth above.

Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations and Per Share Information. The net increase in our net assets resulting from operations for the three months ended June 30, 2014 was $1,120,628, which included $0 in net realized gains and a net increase in unrealized appreciation of $2,324,516 during such period, compared to a net increase in our net assets resulting from operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013 of $9,155, which included $4,400,178 in net realized gains and a net decrease in unrealized appreciation of $3,065,557 during such period.

Basic and diluted net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share was $0.12 for the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared to basic and diluted net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share of less than $0.01 per common share for the three months ended June 30, 2013.

Comparison of Six Months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

Investment Income. For the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, we earned interest and dividend income from cash and cash equivalents of $1,314 and $1,244, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we also earned PIK interest of $52,225 on our subordinated convertible bridge note investments in BrightSource, SilkRoad and Agilyx. Except as set forth above, we did not earn any other investment income during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

The following table shows our PIK loan activity for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, at cost:

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2014			2013

Beginning PIK loan balance (inclusive of $37,377 of PIK interest)	$	1,242,569		$	-
Addition of PIK loans during period		332,357			-
PIK interest accreted to principal during period		52,225			-
Conversion of PIK loans into equity during the period (inclusive of $68,932 of PIK interest)		(1,068,932	)		-
Payments received from PIK loans during the period		-			-
Ending PIK loan balance (inclusive of $20,670 of PIK interest)	$	558,219		$	-

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we invested in the subordinated convertible bridge notes of Agilyx, an existing portfolio company, and we received shares of SilkRoad’s Series D-1 convertible preferred stock upon the automatic conversion of the $1,000,000 convertible bridge note issued to us by SilkRoad, including PIK interest of $68,932 which was also converted.

Operating Expenses. Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were $1,824,102 and $2,627,374, respectively, a decrease of $803,272 compared to the prior period. A summary of the items comprising the decrease in our operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 is set forth in the table below.

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,		Increase /
	2014		2013		(Decrease)
Operating Expenses
Base management fees	$	741,446	$	735,431	$	6,015
Incentive fees		171,586		518,339		(346,753	)
Administrative expenses allocated from investment adviser		328,304		336,764		(8,460	)
Legal and professional fees		189,149		485,557		(296,408	)
Directors fees		50,000		80,000		(30,000	)
Stock transfer agent fees		25,908		32,057		(6,149	)
Custody fees		3,000		3,000		-
Public and investor relations expenses		55,799		50,758		5,041
Marketing and advertising expenses		32,347		10,177		22,170
Printing and production expenses		27,682		62,726		(35,044	)
Postage and fulfillment expenses		22,073		31,971		(9,898	)
Travel expenses		48,054		58,430		(10,376	)
General and administrative expenses		128,754		222,164		(93,410	)

Total Operating Expenses	$	1,824,102	$	2,627,374	$	(803,272	)

The increase of $6,015 in base management fees for the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 was the result of an increase in our gross assets on which the base management fee is calculated.

The decrease of $346,753 in incentive fees for the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 was the result of a decrease of $427,922 in net unrealized appreciation and $1,285,846 of net realized gain on our portfolio company investments during the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to a decrease of $1,808,480 in net unrealized appreciation and $4,400,178 of net realized gain on our portfolio company investments during the six months ended June 30, 2013. See “—Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement” below.

The decrease of $8,460 in administrative expenses allocated from our investment adviser for the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily the result of a decrease in the salary, benefit and other expenses associated with our management and administration which are allocated to us.

The decrease of $296,408 in legal and professional fees for the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily the result of: (i) legal fees of $196,730 and audit fees of $40,000 which were expensed in the six months ended June 30, 2013 in connection with the withdrawal of our registration statement for an underwritten offering, and (ii) decreases in valuation and tax preparation service expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2014.

The decrease of $30,000 in directors’ fees for the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 was the result of a reduction in the size of our Board of Directors in the second quarter of 2013 and a revised compensation program for our non-interested directors which became effective July 1, 2013.

The decrease of $6,149 in stock transfer agent fees for the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 was the result of a reduction in certain ancillary services during the six months ended June 30, 2014.

The increase of $5,041 in public and investor relations fees during the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily the result of increases in seminar and conference registration fees and proxy administrative expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2014, partially offset by a reduction in expenses related the expiration of the service contract with our retainer fee-based public relations firm in 2013, which was not extended.

The increase of $22,170 in marketing and advertising for the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily the result of increases in spending on web-based and social media advertising under our ongoing corporate branding and awareness campaign and press release issuance costs during the six months ended June 30, 2014.

The decreases of $35,044 in printing and production expenses and $9,898 in postage and fulfillment expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 were primarily the result of decreased printing and production volume of investor and marketing materials and the printing and delivery costs of our proxy materials during the six months ended June 30, 2014.

The decrease of $10,376 in travel expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 was the result of a reduction in travel and travel-related expenses related to our participation in investor conferences and meetings with institutional investors during the six months ended June 30, 2014.

The decrease of $93,410 in general and administrative expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily the result of: (i) Edgar filing and printing costs of $50,629 which were expensed in the six months ended June 30, 2013 in connection with the withdrawal of our registration statement for an underwritten offering, and (ii) decreases in director and officer liability insurance premiums, website design improvement costs and subscription costs during the six months ended June 30, 2014, partially offset by an increase in computer hardware and software costs during the six months ended June 30, 2014.

Our operating expenses (excluding base management fees and incentive fees, and costs related to our withdrawn registration statement) for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were $911,070 and $1,086,246, respectively, a decrease of $175,176 compared to the prior period. This decrease was primarily related to decreases in non-offering related legal and professional fees, printing and production expenses, postage and fulfillment expenses and director fees, partially offset by increases in marketing and advertising expenses and public and investor relations expenses. We are currently projecting operating expenses (excluding base management fees, incentive fees, and registration and offering-related costs) for 2014 of about $2.0 million based on our current capital base.

Net Investment Loss. Net investment losses for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were $1,770,563 and $2,626,130, respectively. The decrease of $855,567 in net investment loss for the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 is primarily attributable to: (i) legal and professional fees and Edgar filing and printing costs which were expensed in the six months ended June 30, 2013 in connection with the withdrawal of our registration statement for an underwritten offering, and (ii) decreases in accrued incentive fees, non-offering related legal and professional fees, printing and production expenses and director fees, as discussed above.

Basic and diluted net investment loss per common share outstanding was $0.18 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to basic and diluted net investment loss per common share outstanding of $0.29 for the six months ended June 30, 2013.

Net Realized Gains on Investments. For the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, net realized gains on investments totaled $1,285,846 and $4,400,178, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we sold 415,964 shares of Millennial Media common stock. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we sold our entire positions in Corsair, LifeLock and Solazyme. For additional information regarding the investment cost, net proceeds and realized gains for each of the portfolio company positions sold by us during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, see “Portfolio Composition” above.

Net Decrease in Unrealized Appreciation on Investments. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, the net decrease in unrealized appreciation on investments totaled $427,922. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the net decrease in unrealized appreciation on investments totaled $1,808,480.

The following table summarizes the cost and fair value of our portfolio company investments as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on each individual portfolio company investment comprising the net decrease in unrealized appreciation on investments of $427,922 for the six months ended June 30, 2014, or $0.04 per common share outstanding during the period.

	June 30, 2014							December 31, 2013										Change In
															Change In			Unrealized
					Unrealized							Unrealized			Unrealized			Appreciation
			Fair		Appreciation					Fair		Appreciation			Appreciation			(Depreciation)
Portfolio Company	Cost		Value		(Depreciation)			Cost		Value		(Depreciation)			(Depreciation)			Per Share1

Xtime, Inc.	$	3,000,000	$	6,650,000	$	3,650,000		$	3,000,000	$	5,830,000	$	2,830,000		$	820,000		$	0.09
SilkRoad, Inc.		6,068,932		8,670,000		2,601,068			6,028,667		8,608,667		2,580,000			21,068			*
Metabolon, Inc.		4,000,000		6,140,000		2,140,000			4,000,000		6,140,000		2,140,000			-			-
TrueCar, Inc.		2,999,996		5,019,616		2,019,620			2,999,996		3,720,000		720,004			1,299,616			0.14
Zoosk, Inc.		2,999,999		4,480,000		1,480,001			2,999,999		5,650,000		2,650,001			(1,170,000	)		(0.12	)
Deem, Inc.		3,000,000		4,440,000		1,440,000			3,000,000		3,000,000		-			1,440,000			0.15
Millennial Media, Inc.		3,333,332		4,083,864		750,532			4,999,995		8,074,242		3,074,247			(2,323,715	)		(0.24	)
Mode Media Corporation		4,999,999		5,750,000		750,001			4,999,999		5,750,000		750,001			-			-
Kabam, Inc.		1,328,860		1,930,000		601,140			1,328,860		1,620,000		291,140			310,000			0.03
MBA Polymers, Inc.		2,000,000		2,090,000		90,000			2,000,000		1,530,000		(470,000	)		560,000			0.06
Centrify Corporation		2,999,999		2,999,999		-			-		-		-			-			-
Livescribe, Inc.		606,187		-		(606,187	)		606,187		-		(606,187	)		-			-
Harvest Power, Inc.		2,499,999		1,850,000		(649,999	)		2,499,999		2,770,000		270,001			(920,000	)		(0.10	)
Suniva, Inc.		2,554,287		1,550,000		(1,004,287	)		2,500,007		1,330,000		(1,170,007	)		165,720			0.02
Tremor Video, Inc.		4,000,001		2,831,995		(1,168,006	)		4,000,001		3,479,994		(520,007	)		(647,999	)		(0.07	)
BrightSource Energy, Inc.		3,122,735		1,635,604		(1,487,131	)		3,111,033		1,693,902		(1,417,131	)		(70,000	)		(0.01	)
Stoke, Inc.		4,499,997		2,650,000		(1,849,997	)		3,500,000		940,000		(2,560,000	)		710,003			0.07
Agilyx Corporation		4,332,615		1,550,000		(2,782,615	)		4,000,000		1,840,000		(2,160,000	)		(622,615	)		(0.06	)

Total	$	58,346,938	$	64,321,078	$	5,974,140		$	55,574,743	$	61,976,805	$	6,402,062		$	(427,922	)	$	(0.04	)

* Per share amounts less than $0.01.

1Per share amounts based on weighted-average shares outstanding of 9,609,420 during the six months ended June 30, 2014.

The net increase in unrealized depreciation in Tremor Video, a publicly traded company, during the six months ended June 30, 2014 reflects the change in market prices for this portfolio company. The net increase in unrealized appreciation in TrueCar, which completed its IPO on May 15, 2014, during the six months ended June 30, 2014 reflects the change in market price for TrueCar since the IPO and the fair value of this investment as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors as of December 31, 2013. The net decrease in unrealized appreciation in Millennial Media, also a publicly traded company, during the six months ended June 30, 2014 is comprised of: (i) the net decrease (reversal) of unrealized appreciation of $1,024,748 on the shares of Millennial Media we sold during the period for which we realized a net gain of $1,285,846, and (ii) the net decrease in unrealized appreciation of $1,298,967 during the period on the shares of Millennial Media we continue to hold.

The change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on our private portfolio company investments during the six months ended June 30, 2014 is based upon the fair value determinations made in good faith by our Board of Directors. The write-up or write-down of specific portfolio company investments can be attributed a variety of reasons, including without limitation those set forth above.

The following table summarizes the cost and fair value of our portfolio company investments as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on each individual portfolio company investment comprising the net decrease in unrealized appreciation on investments of $1,808,480 for the six months ended June 30, 2013.

	June 30, 2013							December 31, 2012
															Change In
					Unrealized							Unrealized			Unrealized
			Fair		Appreciation					Fair		Appreciation			Appreciation
Portfolio Company	Cost		Value		(Depreciation)			Cost		Value		(Depreciation)			(Depreciation)

Xtime, Inc.	$	3,000,000	$	5,100,000	$	2,100,000		$	3,000,000	$	4,442,878	$	1,442,878		$	657,122
SilkRoad, Inc.		5,000,000		6,680,000		1,680,000			5,000,000		5,720,000		720,000			960,000
Harvest Power, Inc.		2,499,999		3,370,000		870,001			2,499,999		3,540,000		1,040,001			(170,000	)
Tremor Video, Inc.		4,000,001		4,859,984		859,983			4,000,001		3,850,000		(150,001	)		1,009,984
Metabolon, Inc.		4,000,000		4,840,000		840,000			4,000,000		4,530,000		530,000			310,000
TrueCar, Inc.		2,999,996		3,510,000		510,004			2,999,996		2,680,000		(319,996	)		830,000
Zoosk, Inc.		2,999,999		3,510,000		510,001			2,999,999		3,080,000		80,001			430,000
Glam Media, Inc.		4,999,999		5,430,000		430,001			4,999,999		5,170,000		170,001			260,000
Jumptap, Inc.		4,999,995		5,380,000		380,005			4,999,995		4,999,995		-			380,005
Kabam, Inc.		1,328,860		1,420,000		91,140			1,328,860		980,000		(348,860	)		440,000
LifeLock, Inc.		-		-		-			5,000,000		6,911,002		1,911,002			(1,911,002	)
Corsair Components, Inc.		-		-		-			4,000,080		5,600,000		1,599,920			(1,599,920	)
Solazyme, Inc.		-		-		-			1,505,162		1,162,706		(342,456	)		342,456
Livescribe, Inc.		606,187		-		(606,187	)		606,187		-		(606,187	)		-
MBA Polymers, Inc.		2,000,000		1,340,000		(660,000	)		2,000,000		1,730,000		(270,000	)		(390,000	)
Suniva, Inc.		2,500,007		1,410,000		(1,090,007	)		2,500,007		1,280,000		(1,220,007	)		130,000
BrightSource Energy, Inc.		2,897,131		1,490,000		(1,407,131	)		2,897,131		2,657,125		(240,006	)		(1,167,125	)
Agilyx Corporation		4,000,000		2,490,000		(1,510,000	)		4,000,000		3,650,000		(350,000	)		(1,160,000	)
Stoke, Inc.		3,500,000		1,880,000		(1,620,000	)		3,500,000		3,040,000		(460,000	)		(1,160,000	)

Total	$	51,332,174	$	52,709,984	$	1,377,810		$	61,837,416	$	65,023,706	$	3,186,290		$	(1,808,480	)

The net decrease in unrealized appreciation on investments of $1,808,480 for the six months ended June 30, 2013, or $0.20 per common share outstanding during the period, was comprised of: (i) a net decrease in unrealized appreciation of $3,168,466 on Corsair, Solazyme and LifeLock, which we disposed of during the second quarter of 2013, partially offset by (ii) a net increase in unrealized appreciation of $1,359,986 on our portfolio company investments held at June 30, 2013. See “—Portfolio Composition” above.

The change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on our private portfolio company investments during the six months ended June 30, 2013 is based upon the fair value determinations made in good faith by our Board of Directors. The write-up or write-down of specific portfolio company investments can be attributed a variety of reasons, including without limitation those set forth above.

Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting From Operations and Per Share Information. The net decrease in our net assets resulting from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $912,639, which included $1,285,846 in net realized gains and a net decrease in unrealized appreciation of $427,922 during such period, compared to a net decrease in our net assets resulting from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2013 of $34,432, which included $4,400,178 in net realized gains and a net decrease in unrealized appreciation of $1,808,480 during such period.

Basic and diluted net decrease in net assets resulting from operations per common share was $0.09 for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to basic and diluted net decrease in net assets resulting from operations per common share of less than $0.01 per common share for the six months ended June 30, 2013.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and Cash Equivalents

As of June 30, 2014, we had cash and cash equivalents of $9.8 million, or $1.01 per share, compared to cash and cash equivalents of $13.5 million as of December 31, 2013. The $3.7 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents during the six months ended June 30, 2014 was primarily the result of: (i) the net proceeds of $3.0 million from our sale of a portion of our shares in Millennial Media, offset by (ii) our operating expenses of $1.7 million (net of the decrease in our accrued incentives fees), (iii) our cash distributions to stockholders of $0.6 million, and (iv) our investments in new portfolio companies totaling $3.0 million and in existing investments of $1.4 million.

We primarily invest our cash on hand in money market funds that invest primarily in U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. Government agency securities, and repurchase agreements fully-collateralized by such securities. The investment income we generate from these money market funds is not expected to be significant. Cash needed to fund our near-term operating expenses is held in a bank depository account.

As of June 30, 2014, we are fully invested and, unless we are able to raise additional capital or we have realizations on our existing investments, we have limited capital to make additional portfolio company investments other than follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies. While we expect to generate cash in 2014 from the disposition of our portfolio company positions, there are a number of factors that could affect the timing of these cash inflows, including: (i) uncertainty regarding the equity markets in general, and the IPO market specifically, which could cause delays in the completion of IPOs by our private portfolio companies, (ii) our inability to sell our positions in our publicly traded portfolio companies until expiration of the 180-day post-IPO lockup restrictions, and (iii) our decision to delay the disposition of our public company positions in an effort to maximize our net proceeds.

Our Board of Directors previously declared a third quarter 2014 distribution of $0.10 per share that will be payable to stockholders of record as of August 8, 2014. The third quarter distribution will be paid on September 18, 2014, and record stockholders will have the option to receive payment of this distribution in cash or in shares of the Company’s common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all stockholders is limited to 25% of the aggregate distribution amount. Further, we remain committed to distribute 100% of our net realized gains to our stockholders in accordance with the quarterly distribution policy adopted by our Board of Directions on February 20, 2014. However, in an effort to preserve cash for additional portfolio company investments, we intend to pay the regular quarterly distributions under our quarterly distribution policy in cash or our common stock at the election of stockholders, subject to a limitation that no more than 25% of the aggregate distribution will be paid in cash with the remainder paid in shares of our common stock. We expect to continue to pay a portion of our distributions in shares of our common stock until such time as we have eliminated our stock price discount to net asset value and can successfully access the equity capital markets, or on an ongoing basis.

It is our policy to retain approximately $10 million in cash and cash equivalents to fund our future operating expenses, although the amount we actually retain may vary depending on our operating expenses and the timing of our expected purchases and sales of portfolio company investments. We currently expect to have a portfolio of approximately 20 companies, taking into account our current portfolio composition and our current capital base. Based on our current capital base, the targeted size of our investments in new portfolio companies will be approximately $3 million, but we may invest more or less than this amount depending on the circumstances. We do not expect our $3 million targeted investment size to increase unless we are able to raise additional capital. It is also possible our targeted investment size may decrease over time if we are unable to raise additional capital due to a number of factors, including a reduction in our net assets due to our continuing operating expenses. If our targeted investment size decreases, the number and types of opportunities in which we may be allowed to participate are likely to decline, and we may be unable to invest in opportunities that otherwise meet our investment criteria.

As of June 30, 2014, we had no indebtedness and total accounts payable and accrued expenses of $2,655,950, including amounts owed to our investment adviser. As of June 30, 2014, amounts owed to our investment adviser consisted of $122,038 of base management fees, $54,357 of administrative expenses, and $2,388,474 of accrued incentive fees related to net unrealized appreciation and cumulative net realized gain on our investments. As of December 31, 2013, we had no indebtedness and total accounts payable and accrued expenses of $2,577,084, including amounts owed to our investment adviser. As of December 31, 2013, amounts owed to our investment adviser consisted of $126,515 of base management fees, $51,755 of administrative expenses, and $2,216,888 of accrued incentive fees related to net unrealized appreciation and cumulative net realized gain on our investments. No incentive fees were due and payable to our investment adviser for the six months ended June 30, 2014 or the year ended December 31, 2013 since the aggregate unrealized depreciation on our investments that had a fair value below our investment cost exceeded the amount of our cumulative net realized gain.

Because the portfolio company securities that we have acquired are typically illiquid until an IPO or sale/merger of the company, we generally cannot predict the regularity and time periods between the sales of our portfolio company investments and the realizations of capital gains, if any, from such sales. Sales of our portfolio company investments are discretionary and based on the business judgment of our investment adviser. If we are successful in selling a portfolio company investment, we intend to reinvest the principal amount of our investment and the portion of the net realized gains that we distribute to our stockholders in the form of our shares of common stock, in additional portfolio company opportunities.

Capital Raising

On December 17, 2013, we completed the rights offering and issued 713,562 shares of our common stock to participating stockholders, resulting in gross proceeds of $4,281,372. In connection with the rights offering, we incurred $359,364 of offering costs, resulting in net proceeds of $3,922,008. The net proceeds will be used to make new portfolio company investments in accordance with our investment objective and for general working capital purposes. As of June 30, 2014, we had 9,786,601 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding, which includes 237,699 shares of our common stock issued as stock dividend distributions with respect to our first and second quarter 2014 distributions.

As a business development company, we need the ability to raise additional capital for investment purposes on an ongoing basis. Accordingly, we expect to access the capital markets from time to time in the future to raise cash to fund additional investments. We intend to use the proceeds from these offerings to fund additional investments in portfolio companies consistent with our investment objective. However, we do not intend to raise additional equity capital in 2014 unless and until our stock price is at or above our net asset value per share. Capital for additional portfolio company investments will be provided from our available cash and the proceeds from our sale of existing portfolio company investments.

We may borrow additional funds to make investments, to the extent we determine that additional capital would allow us to take advantage of additional investment opportunities, if the market for debt financing presents attractively priced debt financing opportunities, or if our Board of Directors determines that leveraging our portfolio would be in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders. While a debt offering could raise additional capital for investment, our investment adviser would need to carefully weigh the interest expense of the debt relative to the expected return on the invested capital. There is no assurance that any return from new investments funded by debt would cover the interest expense associated with the debt, which would adversely impact stockholders. Further, any interest expense associated with a debt offering would increase our operating expenses, which continue to be high compared to our peers because of our comparatively lower capital base. We do not currently anticipate issuing any preferred stock, although we could do so if our Board of Directors determines that is was in our best interest and the best interests of our stockholders. The costs associated with any borrowing or preferred stock issuance will be indirectly borne by our common stockholders.

Except for a rights offering, we are not generally able to issue and sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share. We may, however, sell our common stock, at a price below the current net asset value of the common stock, or sell warrants, options or rights to acquire such common stock, at a price below the current net asset value of the common stock if (i) our Board of Directors determines that such sale is in the best interests of the Company and (ii) our stockholders have approved such sale. If our Board of Directors determines that a sale of common stock at a price below the current net asset value is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders, our Board may consider a rights offering or it may seek approval from our stockholders for the authority to sell shares of our common stock below net asset value. We do not intend to raise additional equity capital in 2014 unless and until our stock price is at or above our net asset value per share.

Operating Expenses and Scale

We are currently projecting operating expenses (excluding base management fees, incentive fees, and registration and offering-related costs) for 2014 of about $2.0 million based on our current capital base, which is consistent with approximately $2.1 million for both 2013 and 2012. Our operating expenses (excluding base management fees and incentive fees, and registration and offering-related costs) for the six months ended June 30, 2014 were $911,070. We expect to continue our focus on an investor relations program and corporate branding campaign designed to increase interest in the Company and an active trading market for our shares in an effort to eliminate the current discount between our stock price and our net asset value. We also expect to continue to carefully examine our operating expenses for potential reductions in light of our current capital base. However, we believe there are limited opportunities for further operating cost reductions. Accordingly, our operating expenses at our current capital level will continue to impact our returns to stockholders. To the extent we are able to raise additional capital, our operating expenses should be a lesser percentage burden on the return to our stockholders.

We are currently operating at sub-scale based on our existing capital base. We also believe our investment adviser, with eight employees currently responsible for managing our day-to-day operations including, without limitation, identifying, evaluating, negotiating, closing, monitoring and servicing our investments, has the appropriate resources and infrastructure in place to cost effectively scale our operations. While the base management fee payable to our investment adviser will increase if we increase our total assets, we must also bear certain fixed expenses, such as certain administrative, governance, regulatory and compliance costs that do not generally vary based on our size. Further, as a public company, we incur legal, accounting and other expenses, including costs associated with the periodic reporting requirements applicable to a company whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act, as well as additional corporate governance requirements, including requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and other rules implemented by the SEC, that do not generally vary based on our total assets. On a per share basis, these fixed expenses will be reduced when supported by a larger capital base.

Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement

Because there was a change of control of our investment adviser in connection with the Transaction, an assignment of the Prior Advisory Agreement under the 1940 Act occurred. This assignment automatically terminated the Prior Advisory Agreement in accordance with its terms as required by Section 15 of the 1940 Act, and we entered into the New Advisory Agreement, which we also refer to as the “Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement” herein. The New Advisory Agreement became effective July 1, 2014 and is identical with respect to all material terms and conditions of the Prior Advisory Agreement between us and the investment adviser. The investment advisory fees under the New Advisory Agreement are the same as the investment advisory fees under the Prior Advisory Agreement. The New Advisory Agreement was approved by our stockholders at our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 16, 2014. See “—Recent Developments” below.

Pursuant to the Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement, BDCA Venture Adviser has agreed to serve as our investment adviser and to furnish us with certain administrative services necessary to conduct our day-to-day operations. This agreement is terminable by either party upon proper notice. We pay our investment adviser a fee for its investment advisory services under the Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement consisting of two components: (i) a base management fee, and (ii) an incentive fee. We also reimburse our investment adviser for our allocable portion of overhead and other administrative expenses incurred by it in performing its administrative obligations under the Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement, including an allocable portion of the compensation of our Chief Financial Officer/Chief Compliance Officer, and their respective staff.

The base management fee (the “Base Fee”) is calculated at an annual rate of 2% of our gross assets. The Base Fee is payable monthly in arrears, and is calculated based on the value of our gross assets at the end of the most recently completed calendar quarter, and adjusted for any equity capital raises or repurchases during the current calendar quarter. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, Base Fees payable to our investment adviser were $122,038 and $126,515, respectively.

The incentive fee is payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year and equals 20% of our realized capital gains, if any, on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of each calendar year, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid incentive fees. For purposes of determining the incentive fee to be paid, realized capital gains, realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation are each determined without regard to the holding period for our investments and include both long-term (held more than 12 months) and short-term holdings.

Mathematically, the formula for computing the annual incentive fee payable to our adviser can be written as:

Since inception, we have not paid any incentive fees to our investment adviser. As of June 30, 2014, no incentive fees were due and payable to our investment adviser since the $9,548,222 of aggregate unrealized depreciation on our investments that had a fair value below our investment cost exceeded the $5,968,227 of cumulative net realized gain. No incentive fees were due and payable to our investment adviser for the year ended December 31, 2013 since the $8,903,332 of aggregate unrealized depreciation on our investments that had a fair value below our investment cost exceeded the $4,682,381 of cumulative net realized gain.

As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had recorded accrued incentive fees payable to the investment adviser in the amounts of $2,388,474 and $2,216,888, respectively.

We reimburse the investment adviser for the allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by the investment adviser in performing its administrative obligations under the Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement, including the allocable portion of compensation of our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Compliance Officer, and their respective staff. Our expense allocation ratio is not fixed, and is therefore subject to fluctuation from period to period. In particular, the allocation ratio with respect to compensation of our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Compliance Officer is dependent upon the amount of time each devotes to matters on behalf of us and our investment adviser, respectively. Beginning February 20, 2013, the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Compliance Officer positions have been held by a single individual. Allocated administrative expenses are payable to the investment adviser monthly in arrears. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, allocated administrative expenses payable to the investment adviser were $54,357 and $51,755, respectively.

Commitments and Contingencies

In the normal course of business, we may enter into investment agreements under which we commit to make an investment in a portfolio company at some future date or over a specified period of time. At June 30, 2014, we had not entered into any investment agreements which required us to make a future investment in a portfolio company.

On November 6, 2013, we exchanged our preferred stock interests in Jumptap, Inc. for 1,247,893 shares of common stock in Millennial Media pursuant to a merger transaction. As part of the merger agreement, we, together with other participating stockholders of Jumptap, agreed to indemnify Millennial Media for inaccuracies in any representations or warranties made by Jumptap, any breach by Jumptap of any covenants or agreements, and certain other claims. Participating stockholders, including us, were required to set aside in escrow shares of Millennial Media for the one-year period following the closing as partial security for potential stockholder indemnification obligations. We set aside 135,194 shares of Millennial Media as part of this escrow fund. Any claim for stockholder indemnification must generally be made by Millennial Media by November 6, 2014, the one-year anniversary of the closing. In addition, recovery under the stockholder indemnity obligation is generally limited to the escrow fund. We have not been notified of any stockholder indemnity claims and, accordingly, we have assumed that all of our escrowed shares will be released on the one-year anniversary of the closing for purposes of valuing our interests in Millennial Media’s common stock as of June 30, 2014.

We maintain a directors and officers insurance policy for non-indemnifiable claims covering our officers and directors. We have also agreed to indemnify our directors and officers to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law subject to the restrictions in the 1940 Act.

Under both the Prior Advisory Agreement and the New Advisory Agreement, absent the willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence of our investment adviser or the investment adviser’s reckless disregard of its duties and obligations, we have agreed to indemnify our investment adviser (including its officers, managers, agents, employees and members) for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising out of our investment adviser’s performance of its duties and obligations under the Prior Advisory Agreement and the New Advisory Agreement, except to the extent specified in the 1940 Act.

As of June 30, 2014, we and our officers and directors are not a party to any material legal proceedings. However, from time to time, we may be party to certain legal proceedings incidental to the normal course of our business including the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies.

Recent Developments

Change of Control of Investment Adviser

On July 1, 2014, the members of our investment adviser completed the sale of 100% of their issued and outstanding equity interests (the “Transaction”) of the investment adviser to BDCA Adviser. Upon the closing of the Transaction, our investment adviser became a wholly-owned subsidiary of BDCA Adviser. Because there was a change of control of our investment adviser in connection with the Transaction, an assignment of the Prior Advisory Agreement under the 1940 Act occurred. This assignment automatically terminated the Prior Advisory Agreement in accordance with its terms as required by Section 15 of the 1940 Act.

In connection with the closing of the Transaction, we entered into the New Advisory Agreement with our investment adviser. The New Advisory Agreement became effective July 1, 2014 and is identical with respect to all material terms and conditions of the Prior Advisory Agreement between us and our investment adviser. The investment advisory fees under the New Advisory Agreement are the same as the investment advisory fees under the Prior Advisory Agreement. The New Advisory Agreement was approved by our stockholders at our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 16, 2014.

In connection with the closing of the Transaction, (i) we changed our name to BDCA Venture, Inc., (ii) our investment adviser changed its name to BDCA Venture Adviser, LLC, (iii) the license agreement between us and our investment adviser for our use of the “KEATING” name terminated, and (iv) we entered into a sublicense agreement with our investment adviser pursuant to which our investment adviser granted us a non-exclusive license to use the “BDCA” name.

Our stockholders will continue to own the same amount and type of shares in BDCA Venture as they did in Keating Capital. We did not raise any capital, nor were any new securities issued by us, in connection with the Transaction. The shares of BDCA Venture continue to be listed on Nasdaq and began trading under the new ticker “BDCV” on July 2, 2014.

Portfolio Company Activity

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2014, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. We have identified the following items as critical accounting policies.

Valuation of Portfolio Company Investments

The most significant estimate inherent in the preparation of our financial statements is the valuation of our portfolio investments and the related amounts of unrealized appreciation and depreciation. Value, as defined in Section 2(a)(41) of the 1940 Act, is: (i) the market price for those securities for which a market quotation is readily available, and (ii) for all other securities and assets, fair value is as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors. The 1940 Act requires periodic valuation of each portfolio investment to determine our net asset value. Under the 1940 Act, unrestricted securities with readily available market quotations in an active market are valued at the closing market price on the valuation date; all other assets must be valued at fair value as determined in good faith by or under the direction of our Board of Directors.

Given the nature of investing in the securities of private companies, our investments generally will not have readily available market quotations. Generally, our equity investments in publicly traded companies in which the lockup restriction has expired are valued at the closing market price on the valuation date. However, equity investments in publicly traded portfolio companies which remain subject to lockup restrictions are valued in good faith by our Board of Directors based on a discount to the most recently available closing market prices. Our equity investments in private companies will not generally have readily available market quotations and, as such, are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by or under the direction of our Board of Directors. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, 78.1% and 77.4%, respectively, of our gross assets represented investments in portfolio companies valued at fair value by our Board of Directors.

Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures,” (“ASC 820”) defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). In accordance with ASC 820, the Company uses a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

	●	Level 1: Observable inputs such as unadjusted quoted prices in active markets;

	●	Level 2: Includes inputs such as quoted prices for similar securities in active markets and quoted prices for identical securities where there is little or no activity in the market; and

	●	Level 3: Unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.

We make investments in later stage, typically venture capital-backed, private, pre-IPO companies. We focus on acquiring equity securities that are typically the portfolio company’s most senior preferred stock at the time of our investment or, in cases where we acquire common shares, the portfolio company typically has only common stock outstanding. We may also invest in debt securities, including convertible bridge notes, issued by a portfolio company typically seeking to raise capital to fund their operations until an IPO, sale/merger or next equity financing event. We generally intend to hold these convertible debt securities, or equity-linked securities, for the purpose of conversion into equity at a future date.

Given the nature of investing in the securities of private companies, our investments are generally considered Level 3 assets under ASC 820 until these portfolio companies become public and begin trading on a stock exchange and until such time as these securities are no longer subject to any post-IPO lockup restrictions. As such, we value all of our investments, other than unrestricted securities in publicly traded portfolio companies, at fair value as determined in good faith pursuant to a consistent valuation policy and our Board of Directors in accordance with the provisions of ASC 820 and the 1940 Act.

Determination of fair values involves subjective judgments and estimates. Accordingly, this critical accounting policy expresses the uncertainty with respect to the possible effect of such valuations, and any change in such valuations, on our financial statements. We generally have agreements with our portfolio companies to receive financial and other information with respect to our private portfolio companies on a quarterly basis. However, for our quarterly fair value determinations, we typically will only have access to a portfolio company’s actual financial results as of or for the quarter end which precedes the quarter end for which our fair value determination relates. In addition, we typically only receive updated financial projections for a portfolio company on an annual basis. Due to the inherent uncertainty in determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of our investments determined in good faith by our Board of Directors may differ significantly from the value that would have been used had a ready market existed for such investments, and the differences could be material. Changes in valuation of these equity securities are recorded in our Statement of Operations as “Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments.” In addition, the net changes in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments that we record each period will affect the amount of any accrued incentive fees payable to the investment adviser. Changes in valuation of any of our investments in privately held companies from one period to another may be volatile.

As of June 30, 2014, all of our investments in portfolio companies were determined to be Level 3 assets, except for our investment in Tremor Video, a publicly traded portfolio company, which became a Level 1 asset in the fourth quarter of 2013 upon the expiration of lockup restriction on our Tremor Video shares. Our shares in Tremor Video are valued based on the June 30, 2014 closing price. In addition, as of June 30, 2014, 696,735 shares of common stock that we held in Millennial Media, a publicly traded company, were no longer subject lockup restrictions and became a Level 1 asset in the second quarter of 2014. At June 30, 2014, we still held 135,194 shares of common stock in Millennial Media subject to transfer restrictions under an indemnity escrow which we valued based on the June 30, 2014 closing price, adjusted for a discount due to lack of marketability of 10%.

Determining fair value requires that judgment be applied to the specific facts and circumstances of each portfolio investment while employing a consistently applied valuation process for the types of investments we make. We are required to specifically value each individual investment on a quarterly basis.

At the regular quarterly meeting of our Board of Directors held on July 24, 2014, we dissolved the Valuation Committee effective July 25, 2014 and appointed a lead valuation director, who is an independent member of our Board of the Directors, to act as the liaison between our Board of Directors, our management and our investment adviser. With respect to investments for which market quotations are not readily available, our Board of Directors undertakes a multi-step valuation process each quarter, as described below:

	●	Our quarterly valuation process begins with each portfolio company investment being initially valued by the senior investment professionals of Keating Investments, our investment adviser, responsible for the portfolio investment.

	●	Our lead valuation director will determine each calendar quarter which investments, if any, in our portfolio for which market quotations are not readily available will be reviewed by a third-party valuation firm. The selection of a private portfolio company for periodic valuation review will be made in view of all facts and circumstances. However, there is no requirement that a particular portfolio company have its valuation reviewed by a third-party valuation firm in any specified time interval.

	●	Our lead valuation director reviews the preliminary valuations, and our investment adviser and the third-party valuation firm, if used, respond and supplement the preliminary valuation to reflect any comments provided by the lead valuation director.

	●	Our Board of Directors discusses the valuations and determines, in good faith, the fair value of each investment in our portfolio for which market quotations are not readily available based on the input of our investment adviser, the third-party valuation firm, if used, and the lead valuation director.

We may elect to engage third-party valuation firms to provide assistance to our lead valuation director and our Board of Directors in valuing certain of our investments. Our lead valuation director and our Board of Directors will evaluate the impact of such additional information, and factor it into their consideration of fair value. We have previously engaged third-party valuation firms to conduct periodic valuation reviews of certain of our portfolio investments that are not publicly traded. For the June 30, 2014 valuation of our portfolio investments that are not publicly traded, no third-party valuation firm reviews were conducted.

Equity Investments. Our equity investments for which market quotations are readily available in an active market are generally valued at the most recently available closing market prices and are classified as Level 1 assets. However, equity investments for which market quotations are readily available, but which are subject to lockup provisions restricting the resale of such investments for a specified period of time, are valued at a discount for lack of marketability to the most recently available closing market prices and, accordingly, are classified as Level 3 assets. We generally apply a 10% discount for lack of marketability to positions where a portfolio company has completed an IPO, but where we are still subject to a customary 180-day lockup provision.

The fair values of our equity investments for which market quotations are not readily available (including investments in convertible preferred stock) are determined based on various factors and are classified as Level 3 assets. To determine the fair value of a portfolio company for which market quotations are not readily available, we may analyze the portfolio company’s most recently available historical and projected financial results, public market comparables, and other factors. We may also consider other events, including the transaction in which we acquired our securities, subsequent equity issuances by the portfolio company, mergers or acquisitions affecting the portfolio company, or the completion of an IPO by the portfolio company. In addition, we may consider the trends of the portfolio company’s basic financial metrics from the time of our original investment until the measurement date, with material improvement of these metrics indicating a possible increase in fair value, while material deterioration of these metrics may indicate a possible reduction in fair value. The fair values of our portfolio company securities are generally discounted for lack of marketability or when the securities are illiquid, such as when there are restrictions on resale or the lack of an established trading market which will generally be the case for pre-IPO companies, as well as during any lockup period to which we are subject with respect to public companies in our portfolio.

In determining the fair value of our equity investments in a portfolio company for which market quotations are not readily available, our valuation analysis typically includes the following:

	●	First, we generally derive a marketable equity value for the portfolio company based on our weighting of: (i) the value derived using market multiples of selected comparable public companies or comparable transactions under the market approach, and/or (ii) the value determined by applying a discount rate to the portfolio company’s future cash flows and terminal exit values under the discounted cash flow, or income, approach. As part of this analysis, we use certain valuation metrics such as revenue, EBITDA or net income to derive a marketable equity value under the market and income approaches. Since our pre-IPO portfolio companies tend to be higher growth companies without significant current or projected EBITDA or net income, most of our private companies are valued based on current and future revenue.

	●	Second, after deriving appropriate values using the market approach and/or income approaches, we consider the appropriate weightings, if any, that should be applied to each of these derived values to derive a marketable equity value for the portfolio company.

	●	Third, after deriving a marketable equity value of the portfolio company, we then value the equity securities we hold in the portfolio company based on the precedent transaction value, if applicable, and certain exit scenarios such as an IPO, sale/merger or liquidation. In assessing whether the precedent transaction continues to represent the best indicator, or an indicator, of fair value at valuation dates subsequent to the date of the precedent transaction, we typically will consider the recency of the precedent transaction, along with any significant changes in the portfolio company’s business performance and financial condition and other significant events or conditions occurring subsequent to the date of the precedent transaction. The value of our equity interests under the IPO and sale/merger scenarios is derived using the concluded marketable equity value of the portfolio company. We will also use a cost, or liquidation, approach to value our equity securities in a portfolio company where recent performance or the uncertainty of obtaining additional financing may indicate the portfolio company’s inability to continue as a going concern. In determining the value of our equity securities in a portfolio company, we consider the rights, preferences and limitations of such securities we hold, including whether the securities have any structural protections as discussed above.

	●	Fourth, to the extent the value of our equity securities in a portfolio company is derived based on an IPO or sale/merger event, we will generally apply a discount for lack of marketability (“DLOM”) to the marketable value of our equity securities based on the time frame in which the portfolio company expects to pursue or complete an IPO or sale/merger. After applying a DLOM, the resultant IPO and sale/merger values are valued on a non-marketable basis.

	●	Lastly, we consider the appropriate weightings, if any, that should be applied to each of these derived non-marketable values (IPO, sale/merger, liquidation, or precedent transaction value) to derive the fair value of our private equity securities on a non-marketable basis.

In cases where a portfolio company completes a subsequent financing with different rights and/or preferences than the equity securities we hold, or where we own common stock in a portfolio company with preferred stock outstanding, or where a merger or acquisition event involving a portfolio company has been completed or is pending, we may also consider using option pricing models and/or a backsolve approach to derive the transaction value or marketable equity value, as the case may be.

Debt Investments. Given the nature of our investments in debt investments, historically convertible bridge notes, issued by venture capital-backed portfolio companies, these investments are Level 3 assets under ASC 820 because there is no known or accessible market or market indexes for these investment securities to be traded or exchanged. Since we invest in convertible bridge notes for the primary purpose of potential conversion into equity at a future date, the fair value of our convertible debt investments for which market quotations are not available is determined on an as-converted to equity basis using the same factors we use to value our equity investments (including convertible preferred stock), as discussed above. In making a good faith determination of the value of our convertible debt investments, we generally start with the cost basis of the investment, which includes the value attributed to the original issue discount (“OID”), if any, and PIK interest which has been accreted to principal as earned.

If we determine that there is a low likelihood that our convertible debt investments will be converted into equity or repaid in connection with an IPO, sale/merger or next equity financing event, or will otherwise be held for cash payment at maturity, or in the case of non-convertible debt, we apply a procedure that assumes a disposition of the investment in a hypothetical market to a hypothetical market participant where buyers and sellers are willing participants. The hypothetical market does not include scenarios where the underlying security was simply repaid or extinguished, but includes an exit concept. As part of this process, we will evaluate the creditworthiness of the portfolio company, its ability to meet its current debt obligations, the collateral (if any) for recoverability of the debt investment in the event of default, and whether the security lien, if any, is subordinated to senior lenders. We will also use pricing of recently issued comparable debt securities, if available, to determine the baseline hypothetical market yield as of the measurement date. We consider each portfolio company’s credit rating, if any, security liens and other characteristics of the investment to adjust the baseline yield to derive a hypothetical yield for each debt investment as of the measurement date. The anticipated future cash flows from each debt investment are then discounted at the hypothetical yield to estimate each investment’s fair value as of the measurement date.

Our process includes, among other things, an assessment of the underlying investment performance, the current portfolio company’s financial condition and market changing events that impact valuation, estimated remaining life, current market yield and interest rate spreads of similar securities as of the measurement date. If there is a significant deterioration of the creditworthiness of a debtor, we may consider other factors than those a hypothetical market participant would use to estimate fair value, including the proceeds that would be received in a liquidation analysis.

We record unrealized depreciation on debt investments when we believe that an investment has decreased in value, including where collection of a loan is doubtful or if under the as-converted to equity premise when the value of a debt security were to be less than the amortized cost of the investment. Conversely, where appropriate, we record unrealized appreciation if we believe that the underlying portfolio company has appreciated in value and, therefore, that our investment has also appreciated in value or if under the as-converted to equity premise the value of a debt security were to be greater than the amortized cost.

When acquiring a debt instrument, we may receive warrants or other equity-related securities from the borrower in connection with the debt instrument. We determine the cost basis of the warrants or other equity-related securities received based upon their respective fair values on the date of receipt in proportion to the total fair value of the debt and warrants or other equity-related securities received. Any resulting discount on the loan from recordation of the warrant or other equity instruments is accreted into interest income over the life of the loan.

Valuation Analysis of Portfolio Companies Completing IPO or Sale

The determination of the fair value of our private portfolio companies involves subjective judgments and estimates and is subject to inherent uncertainty. Following an IPO, we value our public portfolio companies based on the market price of these companies, subject to a 10% discount for lack of marketability to positions where we are still subject to a customary 180-day lockup provision. We have presented in the chart below a valuation trend line analysis for the five portfolio companies that have completed an IPO and Millennial Media whose common stock we received in connection with its merger with Jumptap. The valuation trend line analysis includes only those portfolio companies that have either completed an IPO or have merged into a public company. Accordingly, our investment in Corsair which was sold in a private transaction is not included in the chart below.

The valuation trend analysis shows how our reported fair value for each of these companies (as determined by our Board while they were private) compares to the eventual IPO or merger value. The comparison is measured from our initial investment through the date the company becomes public through the IPO or merger. This analysis does not reflect the increase or decrease in the value of our equity interests in these portfolio companies following the IPO or merger since the fair value of these positions post-IPO or merger are derived principally or solely from changes in the portfolio company’s market price.

We also sold our interests in a private portfolio company, Corsair, as part of a control acquisition of Corsair by a private equity firm. We held our interests in Corsair for seven quarters prior to the sale. During this time period, our reported fair value of Corsair on a non-marketable basis, as determined by our Board, exceeded the eventual sale price (also considered a non-marketable value) by 1% to 20%. In the quarter immediately prior to the sale, we valued our interests in Corsair at 7% above the actual sale price. There were two principal reasons that our fair value determinations exceeded the actual sale price. First, we had certain IPO structural protections that were reflected in our fair value determinations, but Corsair was unable to complete an IPO despite filing a registration statement and conducting a roadshow. Second, in connection with the sale to the private equity firm, we incurred certain selling expenses.

See “Note 3. Portfolio Investments and Fair Value” in the accompanying notes to our financial statements for additional information regarding quantitative information about our Level 3 fair value measurements as of June 30, 2014.

Federal Income Taxes. From incorporation through December 31, 2009, we were treated as a corporation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Effective January 1, 2010, we elected to be treated for tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under the Code. We satisfied the RIC requirements for our 2013 taxable year, and we intend to operate so as to qualify as a RIC in 2014, and, as such, we have made no provision for income taxes as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. However, our continued qualification as a RIC requires that we comply with certain requirements contained in Subchapter M of the Code that may affect our ability to pursue additional business opportunities or strategies that, if we were to determine we should pursue, could diminish the desirability of qualifying, or impede our ability to qualify, as a RIC. For example, a RIC must meet certain requirements, including source of income and asset diversification requirements (as described below) and distributing annually at least 90% of its investment company taxable income (the “Annual Distribution Requirement”).

As a RIC, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any investment company taxable income (which is generally our net ordinary income plus the excess, if any, of realized net short-term capital gains over realized net long-term capital losses) or any realized net capital gains (which is generally net realized long-term capital gains in excess of net realized short-term capital losses) that we distribute to our stockholders as dividends. We will be subject to United States federal income tax at the regular corporate rates on any investment company taxable income or capital gain not distributed (or deemed distributed) to our stockholders.

In order to qualify and continue to qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes and obtain the tax benefits accorded to a RIC, in addition to satisfying the Annual Distribution Requirement, we must, among other things:

●

Have in effect at all times during each taxable year an election to be regulated as a business development company under the 1940 Act;


	●	Derive in each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income from (i) dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain securities loans, gains from the sale of stock or other securities, or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in such stock or securities, and (ii) net income derived from an interest in a “qualified publicly traded limited partnership” (the “90% Income Test”); and

	●	Diversify our holdings so that at the end of each quarter of the taxable year:

	●	at least 50% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities, securities of other RICs, and other securities if such other securities of any one issuer do not represent more than 5% of the value of our assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer; and

	●	no more than 25% of the value of our assets is invested in (i) securities (other than U.S. government securities or securities of other RICs) of one issuer, (ii) securities of two or more issuers that are controlled, as determined under applicable tax rules, by us and that are engaged in the same or similar or related trades or businesses, or (iii) securities of one or more “qualified publicly traded partnerships” (the “Diversification Tests”).

Since we did not generate investment company taxable income in 2013, we were not required to make any distributions to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement. Further, because we distributed 100% of our net realized capital gains for the year ended December 31, 2013, no corporate-level federal income or excise taxes were due on such net realized capital gains and, as such, we did not make any provision for federal income or excise taxes as of December 31, 2013.

Distributions, or deemed distributions, of our net capital gains properly reported by us as “capital gain dividends” will be taxable to a U.S. stockholder as long-term capital gains, regardless of the U.S. stockholder’s holding period for his or its shares. In general, non-corporate U.S. stockholders are subject to a maximum federal income tax rate of 20% on their long-term capital gains. In addition, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012, individuals with income in excess of $200,000 ($250,000 in the case of married individuals filing jointly) are generally subject to an additional 3.8% tax on their net capital gains. Corporate U.S. stockholders currently are subject to federal income tax on net capital gain at the maximum 35% rate also applied to ordinary income.

As a RIC, we are also subject to a 4% nondeductible federal excise tax on certain undistributed income unless we distribute in a timely manner an amount at least equal to the sum of (i) 98% of our ordinary income for each calendar year, (ii) 98.2% of our capital gains in excess of capital losses for the one-year period ending December 31 in that calendar year, and (iii) any ordinary income and realized net capital gains for preceding years that were not distributed during such years (the “Excise Tax Avoidance Requirement”). We will not be subject to this excise tax on amounts on which we are required to pay corporate income tax (such as retained realized net capital gains which we designate as “undistributed capital gain” or a deemed distribution). We currently intend to make sufficient distributions (including deemed distributions of retained realized net capital gains) each taxable year to avoid the payment of this excise tax. We elected to calculate excise taxes related to any net capital gains on a calendar year basis on our 2012 tax return.

We may be required to recognize taxable income in circumstances in which we do not receive cash. For example, if we hold debt obligations with PIK provisions, under applicable tax rules, we must include in income each year a portion of the PIK interest earned in that year. Because PIK interest will be included in our investment company taxable income in the year it is earned, we may be required to make a distribution to our stockholders in order to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement, even though we may not have received any corresponding cash amount. As a result, we may have difficulty meeting the Annual Distribution Requirement necessary to maintain our qualification for RIC tax treatment under the Code. We may have to sell some of our investments at times and/or at prices we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or forgo new investment opportunities for this purpose. If we are not able to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to continue to qualify for RIC tax treatment and thus become subject to corporate-level income tax. However, since we do not expect to have investment company taxable income for our taxable year, we would generally not be required to distribute PIK interest from our available cash or the proceeds from the disposition of our portfolio company investments to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement.

For federal income tax purposes, distributions paid to our stockholders are characterized and reported as ordinary income, return of capital, long-term capital gains or a combination thereof. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits would generally be treated first as a return of capital to the extent of the stockholder’s tax cost basis, and any remaining distributions would be treated as a capital gain. The determination of the tax attributes of our distributions is made annually as of the end of our fiscal year based upon our taxable income for the full year and distributions paid for the full year. There can be no certainty to stockholders that this determination is representative of what the tax attributes of our future distributions to stockholders, if any, will actually be. Each year a statement on Form 1099-DIV identifying the source of the distribution (i.e., paid from ordinary income, paid from net capital gains on the sale of portfolio company investments, and/or a return of capital which is a nontaxable distribution) is mailed to our stockholders. To the extent there is a return of capital, investors will be required to reduce their cost basis in our stock for federal tax purposes, which will result in higher tax liability when the shares are sold, even if they have not increased in value or have lost value. In addition, any return of capital paid out of offering proceeds will be net of any sales load and offering expenses associated with sales of shares of our common stock.

In the event we retain some or all of our realized net capital gains, we may designate the retained amount as a deemed distribution to stockholders. In such case, among other consequences, we will pay corporate-level tax on the retained amount, each U.S. stockholder will be required to include its share of the deemed distribution in income as if it had been actually distributed to the U.S. stockholder, and the U.S. stockholder will be entitled to claim a credit or refund equal to its allocable share of the corporate-level tax that we pay on the retained realized net capital gain.

Regulation as a Business Development Company

We have elected to be regulated as a business development company under the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act requires that a majority of our directors be persons other than “interested persons,” as that term is defined in the 1940 Act. In addition, the 1940 Act provides that we may not change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or to withdraw our election as, a business development company without the approval of a “majority of our outstanding voting securities,” within the meaning of the 1940 Act.

Qualifying assets. Under the 1940 Act, a business development company may not acquire any asset other than assets of the type listed in Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, which are referred to here as “qualifying assets,” unless, at the time the acquisition is made, qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the company’s total assets (the “70% test”). The principal categories of qualifying assets relevant to our business are any of the following:

(1)

Securities purchased in transactions not involving any public offering from the issuer of such securities, which issuer (subject to certain limited exceptions) is an eligible portfolio company, or from any person who is, or has been during the preceding 13 months, an affiliated person of an eligible portfolio company, or from any other person, subject to such rules as may be prescribed by the SEC. An eligible portfolio company is defined in the 1940 Act as any issuer which:

(a)

is organized under the laws of, and has its principal place of business in, the United States;

(b)

is not an investment company (other than a small business investment company wholly owned by the business development company) or a company that would be an investment company but for certain exclusions under the 1940 Act; and

(c)

Satisfies any of the following:

(i)

does not have any class of securities that is traded on a national securities exchange;

(ii)

has a class of securities listed on a national securities exchange, but has an aggregate market value of outstanding voting and non-voting common equity of less than $250 million;

(iii)

is controlled by a business development company or group of companies including a business development company and the business development company has an affiliated person who is a director of the eligible portfolio company; or

(iv)

is a small and solvent company having gross assets of not more than $4.0 million and capital and surplus of not less than $2.0 million.

(2)

Securities of any eligible portfolio company that we control.

(3)

Securities purchased in a private transaction from a U.S. issuer that is not an investment company or from an affiliated person of the issuer, or in transactions incident thereto, if the issuer is in bankruptcy and subject to reorganization or if the issuer, immediately prior to the purchase of its securities was unable to meet its obligations as they came due without material assistance other than conventional lending or financing arrangements.

(4)

Securities of an eligible portfolio company purchased from any person in a private transaction if there is no ready market for such securities and we already own 60% of the outstanding equity of the eligible portfolio company.

(5)

Securities received in exchange for or distributed on or with respect to securities described in (1) through (4) above, or pursuant to the exercise of warrants or rights relating to such securities.

(6)

Cash, cash equivalents, certificates of deposit, U.S. Government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment.

Control, as defined by the 1940 Act, is presumed to exist where a business development company beneficially owns more than 25% of the outstanding voting securities of the portfolio company.

If less than 70% of our total assets are comprised of qualifying assets, we would generally not be permitted to acquire any additional non-qualifying assets, until such time as 70% of our then current total assets were comprised of qualifying assets. We would not be required, however, to dispose of any non-qualifying assets in such circumstances. As of June 30, 2014, approximately 97% of our portfolio company investments constituted qualifying investments under Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act.

We do not intend to acquire securities issued by any investment company that exceed the limits imposed by the 1940 Act. Under these limits, we generally cannot acquire more than 3% of the voting stock of any investment company (as defined in the 1940 Act), invest more than 5% of the value of our gross assets in the securities of one such investment company or invest more than 10% of the value of our gross assets in the securities of such investment companies in the aggregate. With regard to that portion of our portfolio invested in securities issued by investment companies, it should be noted that such investments might subject our stockholders to additional expenses.

In addition, a business development company must have been organized and have its principal place of business in the United States and must be operated for the purpose of making investments in the types of securities described in (1), (2) or (3) above.

Managerial assistance to portfolio companies. In general, in order to count portfolio securities as qualifying assets for the purpose of the 70% test, we must either control the issuer of the securities or must offer to make available to the issuer of the securities (other than small and solvent companies described above) significant managerial assistance; except that, where we purchase such securities in conjunction with one or more other persons acting together, one of the other persons in the group may make available such managerial assistance. Making available managerial assistance means, among other things, any arrangement whereby the business development company, through its directors, officers or employees, offers to provide, and, if requested to, provides significant guidance and counsel concerning the management, operations or business objectives and policies of a portfolio company. We expect that any managerial assistance we provide to our portfolio companies will likely involve consulting and advice on the going public process and public capital markets.

Senior securities. We are permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple classes of debt and one class of stock senior to our common stock if our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least equal to 200% immediately after each such issuance. In addition, while any senior securities remain outstanding, we must make provisions to prohibit any distribution to our stockholders or the repurchase of such securities or shares unless we meet the applicable asset coverage ratios at the time of the distribution or repurchase. We may also borrow amounts up to 5% of the value of our gross assets for temporary or emergency purposes without regard to asset coverage.

We may borrow additional funds to make investments, to the extent we determine that additional capital would allow us to take advantage of additional investment opportunities, if the market for debt financing presents attractively priced debt financing opportunities, or if our Board of Directors determines that leveraging our portfolio would be in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders. We do not currently anticipate issuing any preferred stock, although we could do so if our Board of Directors determines that is was in our best interest and the best interests of our stockholders. In the event we do borrow funds to make investments thereafter, we are exposed to the risks of leverage, which may be considered a speculative investment technique. Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for gain and loss on amounts invested and therefore increase the risks associated with investing in our securities. In addition, the costs associated with any borrowing or preferred stock issuance, including any increase in the management fee payable to our investment adviser, will be borne by our common stockholders.

Proxy voting policies and procedures. We vote proxies relating to our portfolio securities in the best interest of our stockholders. We review on a case-by-case basis each proposal submitted to a stockholder vote to determine its impact on the portfolio securities held by us. Although we generally vote against proposals that may have a negative impact on our portfolio securities, we may vote for such a proposal if there exists compelling long-term reasons to do so.

Our proxy voting decisions are made by our investment adviser’s principals. To ensure that our vote is not the product of a conflict of interest, we require that: (i) anyone involved in the decision making process disclose to our Chief Compliance Officer any potential conflict that he is aware of and any contact that he has had with any interested party regarding a proxy vote; and (ii) employees involved in the decision making process or vote administration are prohibited from revealing how we intend to vote on a proposal in order to reduce any attempted influence from interested parties.

Stockholders may obtain information regarding how we voted proxies with respect to our portfolio securities by making a written request for proxy voting information to: Chief Compliance Officer, BDCA Venture, Inc., 5251 DTC Parkway, Suite 1100, Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111.

Temporary investments. Pending investment in other types of “qualifying assets,” as described above, our investments may consist of cash, cash equivalents, certificates of deposit, U.S. government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less. The management fee payable to our investment adviser will not be reduced while our assets are invested in such temporary investments.

Code of ethics. We and our investment adviser have each adopted a code of ethics pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act and Rule 204A-1 under the Advisers Act, respectively, that establishes procedures for personal investments and restricts certain transactions by our personnel. Our codes of ethics generally do not permit investments by our employees in securities that may be purchased or held by us. You may read and copy these codes of ethics at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at (202) 551-8090. In addition, each code of ethics is available on the SEC’s website at www,sec.gov. You may also obtain copies of the codes of ethics, after paying a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following email address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SEC’s Public Reference Section, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. You may also obtain a copy of our code of ethics on our website at www.bdcv.com.

Related Party Agreements and Transactions

In connection with the change of control of our investment adviser in connection with the Transaction, we entered into the New Advisory Agreement effective July 1, 2014, which is identical with respect to all material terms and conditions of the Prior Advisory Agreement between us and the investment adviser. The investment advisory fees under the New Advisory Agreement are the same as the investment advisory fees under the Prior Advisory Agreement. The New Advisory Agreement was approved by our stockholders at our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 16, 2014. Upon the closing of the Transaction, our investment adviser became a wholly-owned subsidiary of BDCA Adviser. See “—Recent Developments” above.

We have a number of business relationships with affiliated or related parties. Timothy J. Keating, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of our investment adviser. Kyle L. Rogers, our Chief Investment Officer, is the Chief Investment Officer of our investment adviser. Frederic M. Schweiger, our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Treasurer and Secretary is the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of our investment adviser. We have also entered into a sublicense agreement with our investment adviser, pursuant to which our investment adviser has granted us a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use the name “BDCA.” See “—Recent Developments” above.

Timothy J. Keating, Kyle L. Rogers and Frederic M. Schweiger currently manage our day-to-day operations and are employed by our investment adviser pursuant to employment agreements. On July 1, 2014, BDCA Adviser, acting in its capacity as the sole member of our investment adviser, appointed Timothy J. Keating, Kyle L. Rogers, Frederic M. Schweiger, Robert K. Grunewald and Peter M. Budko as the members of the Investment Committee of our investment adviser, each of whom is a senior investment professional of our investment adviser and/or one of its affiliates. Messrs. Keating, Rogers and Schweiger have sole investment and dispositive control over our portfolio companies as of July 1, 2014 (the “Legacy Portfolio”). Messrs. Grunewald, Budko and Keating have sole investment and dispositive control over all of our other investments. All actions taken by the Investment Committee or any subdivision thereof must be made by the majority of the persons then acting. The entire Investment Committee makes fair value recommendations to our Board of Directors with respect to the Legacy Portfolio.

Our investment adviser’s services under the New Advisory Agreement are not exclusive, and our investment adviser is free to furnish similar services to other entities so long as its services to us are not impaired. Although we are not aware of any current plans to do so, our investment adviser is not restricted from creating new investment vehicles subject to compliance with applicable law. Currently, the investment professionals and administrative personnel employed by our investment adviser do not serve as principals of or provide services to other investment funds affiliated with our investment adviser; however, they may do so in the future. If they do, persons and entities may in the future manage investment funds with investment objective similar to ours. In addition, our investment adviser, its principals and affiliates, and their respective investment professionals, including the members of the Investment Committee of the foregoing, may serve as investment advisers, officers, directors or principals of entities or investment funds that operate in the same or a related line of business as us. Accordingly, we may not be given the opportunity to participate in certain investments made by investment funds managed by advisers affiliated with our investment adviser. In the event that our investment adviser or its affiliates provide investment advisory services to other entities, we expect that our management and our independent directors will attempt to resolve any conflicts in a fair and equitable manner taking into account factors that would include the investment objective, amount of assets under management and available for investment in additional portfolio companies, portfolio composition and return expectations of us and any other entity, and other factors deemed appropriate. However, in the event such conflicts do arise in the future, our investment adviser intends to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner consistent with our investment objective and strategies so that we are not disadvantaged in relation to any other affiliate or client of our investment adviser.

We rely, in part, on our investment adviser to manage our day-to-day activities and to implement our investment strategy. Our investment adviser may, in the future, be involved with activities which are unrelated to us. As a result of these activities, our investment adviser, its employees and certain of its affiliates may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between us and other activities in which they may become involved. Our investment adviser and its employees will devote only as much of its time to our business as our investment adviser and its employees, in their judgment, determine is reasonably required, which may be substantially less than their full time. Therefore, our investment adviser, its personnel, and certain affiliates may experience conflicts of interest in allocating management time, services, and functions among us and any other business ventures in which they or any of their key personnel, as applicable, may become involved. This could result in actions that are more favorable to other affiliated entities than to us. In such event, we intend to have our independent directors review our investment adviser’s performance periodically, but not less than annually, to assure that our investment adviser is fulfilling its obligations to us under the Investment Advisory and Administration Agreement, that any conflicts are handled in a fair and equitable manner and that our investment adviser has sufficient personnel to discharge fully its responsibilities to all activities in which they are involved.

As a business development company, we may be limited in our ability to invest in any portfolio company in which any fund or other client managed by our investment adviser, or any of its affiliates has an investment. We may also be limited in our ability to co-invest in a portfolio company with our investment adviser or one or more of its affiliates. Subject to obtaining exemptive relief from the SEC, we also may co-invest with any such investment entity to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, or the rules and regulations thereunder.

In the ordinary course of business, we may enter into transactions with portfolio companies that may be considered related party transactions. In order to ensure that we do not engage in any prohibited transactions with any persons affiliated with us, we have implemented certain policies and procedures whereby our executive officers screen each of our transactions for any possible affiliations, close or remote, between the proposed portfolio investment, us, companies controlled by us and our employees and directors. We will not enter into any agreements unless and until we are satisfied that no affiliations prohibited by the 1940 Act exist or, if such affiliations exist, we have taken appropriate actions to seek board review and approval or exemptive relief for such transaction. Our Board of Directors reviews these procedures on an annual basis.

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors is required to review and approve any transactions with related parties (as such term is defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K).

In addition, our code of business conduct and ethics, which is applicable to all our all employees, officers and directors, requires that all employees, officers and directors avoid any conflict, or the appearance of a conflict, between an individual’s personal interests and our interests. Our code of business conduct and ethics is available on our website at www.bdcv.com.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Our business activities contain elements of risk. We consider the primary type of market risk attributable to us to be valuation risk.

Valuation Risk. Value, as defined in Section 2(a)(41) of the 1940 Act, is (i) the market price for those securities for which market quotations are readily available, and (ii) fair value as determined in good faith by, or under the direction of, the Board of Directors for all other assets. (See Notes 2 and 3, Valuation of Investments, included in “Item 1. Financial Statements”)

Because there is initially no public market for the equity securities of the private companies in which we invest, the valuation of these investments is estimated in good faith by our Board of Directors, in accordance with our valuation procedures. In the absence of a readily ascertainable market value, the estimated value of our portfolio of equity securities may differ significantly from the value that would be placed on the portfolio if a ready market for the equity securities existed. Changes in valuation of these equity securities are recorded in our Statement of Operations as “Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments.” Changes in valuation of any of our investments in privately held companies from one period to another may be volatile.

Interest Rate Risk. We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. Changes in interest rates may affect our interest income from portfolio investments and cash and cash equivalents. As of June 30, 2014, we had cash and cash equivalents of $9.8 million. We primarily invest our cash on hand in money market funds that invest primarily in U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. Government agency securities, and repurchase agreements fully-collateralized by such securities. As of June 30, 2014, we had money market fund investments of $9.5 million, pending subsequent investment in portfolio companies in accordance with our investment objective, payment of our operating expenses, or payment of dividends or potential stock repurchases, for which we have market risk exposure relating to fluctuations in interest rates. During June 2014, our money market funds earned an effective annualized dividend of approximately 0.02%. Assuming no other changes to our holdings of money market funds as of June 30, 2014, a one percentage point change in the underlying dividend rate payable on our money market funds as of June 30, 2014 would not have a material effect on the amount of dividend income earned from our money market funds for the following 90-day period.

Our investment income from portfolio companies will also be affected by changes in various interest rates to the extent our debt investments include floating interest rates. As of June 30, 2014, none of our income-bearing debt investments in portfolio companies bore interest based on floating rates. However, in the future, we may have other loans in our portfolio that have floating rates.

Changes in interest rates may affect our cost of borrowing in the event we incur debt to finance the purchase of our investments in portfolio companies. As of June 30, 2014, we had no debt for borrowed money. However, we may borrow funds to make investments to the extent we determine that additional capital would allow us to take advantage of additional investment opportunities, if the market for debt financing presents attractively priced debt financing opportunities, or if our Board of Directors determines that leveraging our portfolio would be in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders.

We may engage in hedging transactions with respect to the market risks to which we are exposed subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act. We may hedge against interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments such as futures, options and forward contracts. However, if we do engage in hedging transactions, we may expose ourselves to risks associated with such transactions. We have not engaged in any hedging activities since our inception, and we currently do not expect to engage in any hedging activities with respect to the market risks to which we are exposed. We also do not intend to lend the securities of our publicly traded portfolio companies to generate fee income.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

As of June 30, 2014 (the end of the period covered by this quarterly report), we, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the 1934 Act). Based on that evaluation, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective and provided reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our periodic SEC filings is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. However, in evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Management has not identified any change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second quarter of 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

We are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, is any material legal proceeding threatened against us. From time to time, we may be a party to certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings relating to the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. While the outcome of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect upon our financial condition or results of operations.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

In addition to other information set forth in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the “Risk Factors” discussed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, which has been filed with the SEC. Except as set forth below, there has been no material changes during the six months ended June 30, 2014 to the risk factors discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

While we did not engage in unregistered sales of equity securities during the six months ended June 30, 2014, on February 20, 2014, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.10 per share payable on April 14, 2014 and June 17, 2014, to common stockholders of record on March 6, 2014 and May 8, 2014, respectively. Stockholders had the option to receive payment of these dividends in cash or in shares of our common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all stockholders for each dividend was limited to 25% of the aggregate dividend amount.

Based on stockholder elections, the April 14, 2014 dividend consisted of $238,722 in cash and 119,157 shares of newly-issued common stock, or 1.2% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment, and the June 17, 2014 dividend consisted of $241,701 in cash and 118,542 shares of common stock, or 1.2% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion of the April 14, 2014 dividend was calculated based on a price of $6.0103 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of our common stock on April 7, 8 and 9, 2014. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion of the June 17, 2014 dividend was calculated based on a price of $6.1169 per share, which equaled the volume weighted average trading price per share of our common stock on June 10, 11 and 12, 2014. These issuances were not subject to the registration requirements under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Item 3.

Defaults upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5.

Other Information

None.

Item 6.

Exhibits.

3.1	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-157217), filed on April 21, 2010)

3.2	Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-157217), filed on May 27, 2010)

3.3	Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-53504), filed on July 1, 2014)

3.4	Amended and Restated Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-53504), filed on April 23, 2009)

3.5	Amendment to Amended and Restated Bylaws dated August 5, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-53504), filed on August 9, 2010)

3.6	Amendment to Amended and Restated Bylaws dated October 22, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-53504), filed on October 26, 2010)

3.7	Amendment to Amended and Restated Bylaws dated July 1, 2014 (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-53504), filed on July 1, 2014)

3.8	Amended and Restated Dividend Reinvestment Plan (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-191525), filed on October 2, 2013)

4.1	Form of Share Certificate (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 0-53504), filed on March 9, 2009)

10.1	Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement between BDCA Venture, Inc. and BDCA Venture Adviser, LLC dated July 1, 2014 (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-53504), filed on July 1, 2014)
10.2	Trademark Sublicense Agreement between BDCA Venture, Inc. and BDCA Venture Adviser, LLC dated July 1, 2014 (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-53504), filed on July 1, 2014)

10.3	Form of Indemnification Agreement for Directors (Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-157217), filed on June 5, 2009)

10.4	Custody Agreement between the Company and Steele Street Bank & Trust (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 0-53504), filed on November 20, 2008)

10.5	First Amendment to Custody Agreement between the Company and Steele Street Bank & Trust dated December 21, 2012 (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 0-53504), filed on February 15, 2013)

11	Computation of Per Share Earnings (included in the notes to the unaudited financial statements contained in this report)

31.1*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

31.2*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

32.1*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

*	Filed herewith

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused the report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: July 28, 2014	KEATING CAPITAL, INC.


	By:	/s/ Timothy J. Keating
		Timothy J. Keating President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


	By:	/s/ Frederic M. Schweiger
		Frederic M. Schweiger Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

CROSSROADS LIQUIDATING TRUST - FORM 10-Q - July 28, 2014

Attached files

CROSSROADS LIQUIDATING TRUST Reports