UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_______________

Form 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended February 28, 2014 or

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                    to

Commission file number: 000-54329

ORGENESIS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

21 Sparrow Circle, White Plains, NY, 10605
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(845) 591-3144

Not Applicable
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X]               No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [X]               No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

[  ] Yes               [X] No

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: As of April 10th, 2014 there were 53,860,299 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 outstanding.

ORGENESIS INC.

FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1

PART I – UNAUDITED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ORGENESIS INC.
(A development stage company)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In U.S. dollars
(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

ORGENESIS INC.
(A development stage company)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
In U.S. dollars
(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

ORGENESIS INC.
(A development stage company)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ CAPITAL DEFICIENCY
In U.S. dollars
(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

ORGENESIS INC.
(A development stage company)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
In U.S. dollars
(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

ORGENESIS INC.
(A development stage company)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 — GENERAL AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Orgenesis Inc. (the “Company”), incorporated in the State of Nevada on June 5, 2008 together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Group”) is engaged in the research and development of a new technology for regeneration of functional insulin-producing cells, thus, enabling normal glucose regulated insulin secretion, via cell therapy.

The Group is engaged in research and development in the biotechnology field and is considered a development stage company in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 915, “Development Stage Entities”.

These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial statements. Accordingly, they do not contain all information and notes required by U.S. GAAP for annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, which include normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s consolidated financial position as of February 28, 2014, the consolidated results of operations and comprehensive loss, and the consolidated cash flows for the three-month periods ended February 28, 2014 and 2013 and for the period from June 5, 2008 (inception date) to February 28, 2014.

The financial data and other information disclosed in the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements related to these periods are unaudited. The results for the three-month period ended February 28, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending November 30, 2014.

These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K the year ended November 30, 2013. The condensed consolidated balance sheet data as of November 30, 2013 was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended November 30, 2013, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP.

These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has net losses for the period from inception (June 5, 2008) through February 28, 2014 of $11,384,289, as well as a negative cash flows from operating activities. Presently, the Company does not have sufficient cash resources to meet its plans in the twelve months following February 28, 2014. Management is in the process of evaluating various financing alternatives, as the Company will need to finance future research and development activities and general and administrative expenses in either the public or private equity markets.

These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Management believes that it will be able to secure the necessary financing as a result of ongoing financing discussions with third party investors and existing shareholders, including via future exercise of 4,055,567 warrants for a total amount of $2,130,894. See also Notes 4b and 6. However, there is no assurance that the Company will be successful with those initiatives.

These condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to obtain additional financing as may be required and ultimately to attain profitability. If the Company is unsuccessful in raising additional financing, it may need to curtail, discontinue or cease operations.

6

ORGENESIS INC.
(A development stage company)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 2 — FAIR VALUE PRESENTATION

The fair value measurement guidance clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. It establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under the fair value measurement guidance are described below:

Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 — Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;

Level 3 — Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).

As of February 28, 2014, the assets or liabilities measured at Level 3 fair value comprise of warrants (see Note 6). In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible.

The fair value of each of the warrants described in Note 6 is determined by using a Monte Carlo type valuation model based on a risk neutral approach. The model takes as an input the estimated future dates when new capital will be raised, and builds a multi-step dynamic model. The first step is to model the risk neutral distribution of the share value on the new issuance dates. Then for each path to use the Black-Scholes valuation model to estimate the value of the warrants on the last issuance date including all the changes in exercise price and quantity along this path. The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement is the future expected issuance dates.

Significant delay in this input would result a higher fair value measurement.

The following table presents the assumptions which were used for the model as of February 28, 2014:

7

ORGENESIS INC.
(A development stage company)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

The following table sets forth certain fair value information at February 28, 2014 and November 30, 2013 for financial liabilities measured at fair value by level.

The table below sets forth a summary of the changes in the fair value of the Company’s financial liabilities classified as Level 3 (i.e. warrants) for the three months ended February 28, 2014:

NOTE 3 – COMMITMENTS:

As of February 28, 2014 the Company has not reached these milestones.

8

ORGENESIS INC.
(A development stage company)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

As of February 28, 2014 the Company has not reached these milestones.

On October 23, 2013, 255,413 performance options were granted to Mr. Dipasqale based on his agreement.

On December 23, 2013, Mr. DiPasquale, resigned. As a result of his resignation all options that were not vested were forfeited.

On January 2, 2014, the board of directors approved a grant of 368,393 options out of the 1,473,537 options mentioned in b. above. The grant is based on Mr. DiPasquale’s employment agreement.

According to Mr. DiPasquale’s employment agreement, all vested options expire 90 days after the date of termination of employment.

On February 19, 2014, Mr. DiPasquale exercised 623,806 options at a price of $0.001 per share.

9

ORGENESIS INC.
(A development stage company)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 4 – CAPITAL DEFICIENCY:

10

ORGENESIS INC.
(A development stage company)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 5 – LOAN AGREEMENTS:

11

ORGENESIS INC.
(A development stage company)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 6 – WARRANTS

As part of the Company’s private placements and loan received as described in Notes 4 and 5, the Company issued warrants, as follows:

12

ORGENESIS INC.
(A development stage company)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 7 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:

13

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are projections in respect of future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “should”, “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements made in a quarterly report on Form 10-Q includes statements about:

• our plans to identify and acquire products that we believe will be prospective for acquisition and development;
• our intention to develop to the clinical stage a new technology for regeneration of functional insulin-producing cells, thus enabling normal glucose regulated insulin secretion, via cell therapy;
• our belief that our treatment seems to be safer than other options;
• our belief that our major competitive advantage is in our cell transformation technology;
• our marketing plan;
• our plans to hire industry experts and expand our management team;
• our belief that Diabetes Mellitus will be one of the most challenging health problems in the 21st century and will have staggering health, societal and economic impact;
• our beliefs regarding the future of our competitors;
• our expectation that the demand for our products will eventually increase; and
• our expectation that we will be able to raise capital when we need it.

These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled “Risk Factors” set forth in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2013, any of which may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks include, by way of example and not in limitation:

• general economic and business conditions;
• substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern;
• we may need to raise additional funds in the future which may not be available on acceptable terms or at all;
• if we are unable to successfully recruit and retain qualified personnel, we may not be able to continue our operation;
• we may not be able to successfully implement our business plan;
• conditions in Israel and the surrounding Middle East may materially adversely affect our subsidiary’s operations and personnel;
• the ability of our Israeli subsidiary to pay dividends is subject to limitations under Israeli law and dividends paid and loans extended by our subsidiary may be subject to taxes;
• Tel Hashomer - Medical Research, Infrastructure and Services Ltd. (“THM”) may cancel the License Agreement;
• if we are unable to successfully acquire, develop or commercialize new products, our operating results will suffer;
• our expenditures may not result in commercially successful products;
• third parties may claim that we infringe their proprietary rights and may prevent us from manufacturing and selling some of our products;
• extensive industry regulation has had, and will continue to have, a significant impact on our business, especially our product development, manufacturing and distribution capabilities; and
• other factors discussed under the section entitled “Risk Factors” set forth in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2013.

These risks may cause our company’s or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity or performance to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity or performance expressed or implied by these forward looking statements.

14

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity or performance. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

As used in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and unless otherwise indicated, the terms “we”, “us”, “our”, or the “company” refer to Orgenesis Inc. and our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Orgenesis Ltd., (the “Israeli Subsidiary”) and Orgenesis SBRL (the “Belgian Subsidiary”). Unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States dollars.

Corporate Overview

We were incorporated in the state of Nevada on June 5, 2008 under the name Business Outsourcing Services, Inc.

Effective August 31, 2011, we completed a merger with our subsidiary, Orgenesis Inc., a Nevada corporation which was incorporated solely to effect a change in our name. As a result, we changed our name from “Business Outsourcing Services, Inc.” to “Orgenesis Inc.”.

Effective August 31, 2011, we effected a 35 to 1 forward stock split of our authorized and issued and outstanding common stock. As a result, our authorized capital has increased from 50,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.0001 to 1,750,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.0001. On February 27, 2012, we filed a Certificate of Correction with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada, correcting the par value of 1,750,000,000 shares of common stock which was incorrectly stated as $0.001 to 1,750,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.0001. Unless otherwise noted, all references in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q to number of shares, price per share or weighted average number of shares outstanding have been adjusted to reflect the stock split on a retroactive basis.

Our Current Business

On August 5, 2011, we entered into a letter of intent with Prof. Sarah Ferber and Ms. Vered Caplan according to which, inter alia, Prof. Ferber has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause THM to license us all of the assets associated with “Methods Of Inducing Regulated Pancreatic Hormone Production” and “Methods of Inducing Regulated Pancreatic Hormone Production In Non-Pancreatic Islet Tissues”.

On October 11, 2011, we incorporated Orgenesis Ltd. as our wholly-owned subsidiary under the laws of Israel. On February 2, 2012, Orgenesis Ltd. signed and closed a definitive agreement to license patents and knowhow related to the development of autologous insulin producing (“AIP”) cells.

Based on the licensed knowhow and patents, our intention is to develop to the clinical stage a new technology for regeneration of functional insulin-producing cells, thus enabling normal glucose regulated insulin secretion, via cell therapy. By using a therapeutic agent (i.e., PDX-1, or additional pancreatic transcription factors in adenovirus-vector) that efficiently converts a sub-population of liver cells into pancreatic islets phenotype and function, this approach allows the diabetic patient to be the donor of his own therapeutic tissue. The development of AIP cells is based on the licensed patents and knowhow. We believe that our major competitive advantage is in our cell transformation technology.

This technology was licensed based on the published work of Prof. Ferber. Prof. Ferber has developed this technology, as a researcher in THM, and has established a proof of concept that demonstrates the capacity to induce a shift in the developmental fate of cells in liver and convert them into ‘pancreatic beta cell like’ cells. Furthermore, those cells were found to be resistant to the autoimmune attack.

We intend to develop our business by further developing the technology to a clinical stage. We intend to dedicate most of our capital to research and development with no expectation of revenue from product sales in the foreseeable future.

Recent Corporate Developments

Since the commencement of our first quarter ended February 28, 2014, we experienced the following corporate developments:

15

Private Placement

During the three months ended February 28, 2014, we issued 1,128,849 units to 13 investors in a non-brokered private placement, at a purchase price of $0.52 per unit for gross proceeds of $587,001. Each unit consisted of one share of our common stock and one non-transferable common share purchase warrant, with each warrant entitling the holder to acquire one additional share of our common stock at a price of $0.52 per share for a period of three years. The units were actually issued on March 3, 2014.

We issued:

Convertible Loans with Mediapark A.G.

On December 6, 2013, we entered into a convertible loan agreement with Mediapark A.G., a Marshall Islands company (“Mediapark”), pursuant to which Mediapark purchased an 8% unsecured convertible debenture (the “Convertible Loan”) in the aggregate principal amount of $100,000. On March 22, 2013, we entered into a similar convertible loan agreement with Mediapark in the aggregate principal amount of $250,000. The agreement states that if we complete equity financing prior to the maturity date of the loan, in an amount greater than $350,000, Mediapark would convert all our outstanding indebtedness into equity securities on the same terms as the current financing. As a result, on March 3, 2014, both loans in the aggregate amount of $370,772 (principle and interest) outstanding as of that date were converted into 713,023 shares of common stock at a price of $0.52 and 713,023 warrants to acquire additional shares of our common stock at a price of $0.52 per share for a period of three years in full payment of our indebtedness.

Former President and Chief Executive Officer

Effective December 23, 2013, Mr. Sav DiPasquale resigned as our President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. DiPasquale’s resignation was not as a result of any disagreement between our company or our policies. On the same date, we appointed Mr. Vered Caplan as interim President and Chief Executive Officer of our company until a replacement is named.

Effective as of January 24, 2014, we granted 368,393 stock options to Mr. DiPasquale as fully earned pursuant to his employment agreement with our company, which has now been terminated. Each stock option was exercisable at a price of $0.001 per option share until March 31, 2014, and the options are fully vested. The grant is subject to the terms of our 2012 stock option plan. On February 19, 2014, Mr. DiPasquale exercised 623,806 options at a price of $0.001 per share.

Kodiak Capital Group, LLC

In December 2013, we entered into a $3,000,000 common stock purchase agreement with Kodiak Capital Group, LLC, a Newport Beach-based institutional investor (“Kodiak”). On March 28, 2014, our registration statement covering the shares that may be issued to Kodiak under the terms of the common stock purchase agreement was declared effective by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), see “Prospectus” below. In connection with the entering of the stock purchase agreement, we have paid a commitment fee of 250,000 shares in restricted common shares of our company to Kodiak.

Our ability to put shares to Kodiak and obtain funds under the equity line is limited by the terms and conditions in the investment agreement dated December 13, 2013, including restrictions on when we may exercise our put rights, restrictions on the amount we may put to Kodiak at any one time, which is determined in part by the trading volume of our common stock, and a limitation on our ability to put shares to Kodiak. In addition, we do not expect the equity line to satisfy all of our funding needs, even if we are able and choose to take full advantage of the equity line.

16

Prospectus

On March 28, 2014, we filed a prospectus pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) which is a part of a registration statement filed by us with the SEC. Under the prospectus, the selling stockholders identified in the prospectus may offer and sell up to 10,603,436 shares of our common stock, which will consist of: (i) up to 250,000 shares of common stock issued or to be issued to Kodiak as commitment shares pursuant to the common stock purchase agreement dated December 13, 2013 and up to 7,300,000 shares of common stock to be sold by Kodiak pursuant to the common stock purchase agreement; (ii) 1,526,718 shares of common stock issued to ATMI BVBA (“ATMI”); and (iii) up to 1,526,718 shares of common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of warrants issued to ATMI. The 7,550,000 shares of common stock registered for resale by Kodiak represents 14% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock as of March5, 2014.

The selling stockholders may sell all or a portion of the shares being offered pursuant to this prospectus at fixed prices, at prevailing market prices at the time of sale, at varying prices or at negotiated prices.

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares of our common stock by the selling stockholders. We will pay for expenses of this offering, except that the selling stockholders will pay any broker discounts or commissions or equivalent expenses applicable to the sale of their shares.

Consulting agreement with Aspen Agency Limited

On April 3, 2014, we entered into a consulting agreement with Aspen Agency Limited, a Hong Kong corporation (“Aspen”), pursuant to which Aspen has agreed to provide investment banking, investor relations and business development services to our company. In consideration for Aspen’s services, we have agreed to issue to Aspen 3,000,000 stock options to acquire shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.52 per share, for a period of three years. The options will be subject to vesting provisions as follows:

The term of the consulting agreement is from April 3, 2014, and will run for an indefinite period unless terminated by either party providing 30 days written notice.

Results of Operations

The following summary of our results of operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed financial statements for the three months ended February 28, 2014:

Revenue

We have not earned any revenues since our inception and we do not anticipate earning revenues in the near future.

Expenses

Our expenses for the three months ended February 28, 2014 are summarized as follows in comparison to our expenses for the three months ended February 28, 2013:

17

Research and development expenses

The increase in salaries and related expenses in the three months ended February 28, 2014 is due mainly to change in mix of employees from general and administrative to research and development activities. The increase in professional fees is related to expansion of research and development operations in the three months ended February 28, 2014, mainly in Europe.

General and Administrative Expenses

The decrease in salaries and related expenses and stock-based compensation in the three months ended February 28, 2014 is due to change in mix of employees from general and administrative to research and development activities. The increase in other expenses in the three months ended February 28, 2014, compared to the same quarter last year is mainly due to accounting and legal expenses for fundraising and start of operation in Europe during the first quarter of 2014.

Financial Expenses

The decrease in the fair value of the warrants is mainly due to a decrease in the price of our shares of common stock.

Liquidity and Financial Condition

Working Deficiency

18

The increase in current assets is due to the issuance of units of shares of common shares and warrants in a non-brokered private placement during the three months ended February 28, 2014, The increase in current liabilities was due to expended activities and the Mediapark Loan which was converted to equity in March 2014.

Cash Flows

The increase in net cash used in operating activities in the three months ended February 28, 2014 is related to our expanded operations this quarter. The increase in cash provided by financing activities in the three months ended February 28, 2014 is mainly due to the $687,001 we raised during the quarter ended February 28, 2014, compared to $500,000 in the same quarter last year.

The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements contained in Item 1 have been prepared assuming that the company will continue as a going concern. We have net losses for the period from inception (June 5, 2008) through February 28, 2014, of $ 11,384,289 as well as a negative cash flow from operating activities. Presently, we do not have sufficient cash resources to meet our plans in the 12 months following February 28, 2014. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Management is in the process of evaluating various financing alternatives, as we will need to finance future research and development activities and general and administrative expenses through fund raising in the public or private equity markets. Although there is no assurance that we will be successful with those initiatives, management believes that we will be able to secure the necessary financing as a result of ongoing financing discussions with third party investors and existing shareholders.

The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may be necessary should the company be unable to continue as a going concern. Our continuation as a going concern is dependent on our ability to obtain additional financing as may be required and ultimately to attain profitability.

Cash Requirements

Our plan of operation over the next 12 months is to:

• initiate regulatory activities in Asia, Europe and the United states;

• locate suitable centers and sign a collaboration agreement;

• collaborate with clinical centers, specifically those performing Pancreatic Islet transplantations, in order to carry out clinical studies;

• identify optional technologies for scale up of the cells production process (this activity will be carried out at subcontracted facilities of the Sheba Medical Center);

• initialize efforts to validate the manufacturing process (in certified labs); and

• raise sufficient capital to perform initial clinical safety testing.

We estimate our operating expenses for the next 12 months as of February 28, 2014 to be as follows:

19

Future Financing

We will require additional funds to implement our growth strategy for our new business. These funds may be raised through equity financing, debt financing, or other sources, which may result in further dilution in the equity ownership of our shares.

There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us when needed or, if available, that it can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. If we are not able to obtain the additional financing on a timely basis should it be required, or generate significant material revenues from operations, we will not be able to meet our other obligations as they become due and we will be forced to scale down or perhaps even cease our operations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to stockholders.

Significant Accounting Policies

A comprehensive discussion of our significant accounting policies is included in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2013 filed with the SEC on February 19, 2014.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not Applicable.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our interim president and chief executive officer (who is our principal executive officer) and our chief financial officer, treasurer, and secretary (who is our principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and our management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. The ineffectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures was due to material weaknesses identified in our internal control over financial reporting, described below.

20

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer has conducted an assessment, including testing, using the criteria in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) (1992). Our system of internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.

Our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, conducted an evaluation of the design and operation of our internal control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2014 based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation. Based on this evaluation, our management concluded our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of February 28, 2014. The ineffectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting was due to the following material weaknesses which are indicative of many small companies with small staff:

Our company plans to take steps to enhance and improve the design of our internal control over financial reporting. During the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, we have not been able to remediate the material weaknesses identified above. To remediate such weaknesses, we plan to implement the following changes during our fiscal year ending November 30, 2014:

The remediation efforts set out in (i) is largely dependent upon our company securing additional financing to cover the costs of implementing the changes required. If we are unsuccessful in securing such funds, remediation efforts may be adversely affected in a material manner.

Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended February 28, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We know of no material pending legal proceedings to which our company or our subsidiary is a party or of which any of our properties, or the properties of our subsidiary, is the subject. In addition, we do not know of any such proceedings contemplated by any governmental authorities.

21

We know of no material proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial stockholder is a party adverse to our company or our subsidiary or has a material interest adverse to our company or our subsidiary.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common stock involves a number of very significant risks. You should carefully consider the risk factors included in the “Risk Factors” section of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2013 filed with the SEC on February 19, 2014 in addition to other information in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2013 filed with the SEC on February 19, 2014 and in this quarterly report in evaluating our company and its business before purchasing shares of our company’s common stock. Our business, operating results and financial condition could be seriously harmed due to any of those risks. You could lose all or part of your investment due to any of these risks.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

22

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

23

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

ORGENESIS INC.

By:

/s/Vered Caplan               
Vered Caplan
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairperson of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: April 10, 2014

/s/ Dov Weinberg           
Dov Weinberg
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: April 10, 2014

24