Attached files

file filename
8-K - 8-K - CARBO CERAMICS INCd698578d8k.htm
....provides industry leading technology for Production Enhancement
and Environmental Services
Howard Weil 42
nd
Annual Energy Conference
New Orleans, Louisiana
March 25, 2014
Exhibit 99.1


The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe harbor" for forward-looking
statements.
Any
written
or
oral
statements
made
by
the
Company
or
on
behalf
of
the
Company
in
conjunction
with this presentation may include forward-looking statements which reflect the Company's current views
with respect to future events and financial performance. These forward-looking statements are subject to
certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. This
document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995 concerning, among other things, the Company's prospects, developments and business strategies
for its operations, all of which are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. These risks and
uncertainties include, but are not limited to, changes in overall economic conditions, changes in the cost of
raw materials and natural gas used in manufacturing our products, changes in demand and prices charged for
our products, changes in the demand for, or price of, oil and natural gas, risks of increased competition,
technological, manufacturing, distribution and product development risks, loss of key customers, changes in
government regulations, foreign and domestic political and legislative risks, the risks of war and international
and
domestic
terrorism,
risks
associated
with
foreign
operations
and
foreign
currency
exchange
rates
and
controls,
weather-related
risks
and
other
risks
and
uncertainties
described
in
our
publicly
available
filings
with
the
Securities
and
Exchange
Commission.
The
words
"believe,”
"expect,”
"anticipate,”
"project"
and
similar
expressions identify forward-looking statements.
Participants are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, each of which
speaks
only
as
of
the
date
the
statement
was
made.
The
Company
undertakes
no
obligation
to
publicly
update
or
revise
any
forward-looking
statements,
whether
as
a
result
of
new
information,
future
events
or
otherwise,
except as required by law.
Forward Looking Statements


Production Enhancement
Environmental Services
....provides industry leading technology for:


“We increase well Production and EUR through
our Design, Build, and Optimize the Frac
workflow”
The value we create, is lower F&D costs and a higher
Recovery Factor
Well Cost $
Increased Production & EUR
Lower F&D  ($/BOE)
=
TM


Frac Conductivity &
Durability
Production Assurance
Production Intelligence
Flow Enhancement
Well Site Supervision
Frac Diagnostics & Optimization
Field Development Optimization
Reservoir & Formation Analysis
Frac Design
Economic Optimization 
Reservoir Performance 
Post Job Analysis
….a leading production enhancement company


Is the industry’s most widely used hydraulic fracturing design software,
clients include E&P Operators, Service Companies, Universities
Provides Frac Design, Economic Optimization, Reservoir Performance and
Post
Job
Analysis.
Ties
all
the
information
together
during
the
frac
process.


Reservoir
Reservoir
Fracture
Fracture
Design
Design
Production
Production
Completion
Completion
Best practices
Best practices
Execution
Execution
Experienced, industry experts working
in Unconventional Reservoirs
Provide technical consulting from
Well-site to Office to Full Field
Analysis
Integrating leading Technology to
increase well Production & EUR


Proppant Delivered Technology Platforms
“More Space to Flow”
Higher
EUR
Production
IRR
Ceramics
Production
Assurance
Flow
Enhancement
Production
Intelligence
Proppant
Delivered
Proppant
Delivered
Proppant
Delivered
Resin Coated Products


Ultra-conductive ultra-high strength
proppant technology
Developed for deep wells and
ultra-high stress formations


More conductivity
100% more baseline
conductivity


Plant produced proppant grains
Precision-Engineered
More Space to Flow
More strength
More durability
More uniformity
More roundness
More smoothness
More flow space
More uniform flow paths
More long-term conductivity
More production, increased
EUR and superior IRR


Highest Conductivity Proppant in the Industry
Outstanding
performance
under pressure


Lbs (Millions)
Millen Line 1 est completion near end of Q2-2014
Millen Line 2 est completion near end of H1-2015
Environmental permits obtained for all 4 Millen lines
Ceramic Proppant Sales vs Capacity


“Proppant is one of the biggest factors in
determining Production and EUR in fracture
stimulated wells.  It is important that E&P
Operators know what Proppant is being used
in their wells.  Make sure you are getting the
Conductivity and Quality you are paying for.”
Proppant Conductivity and Quality in the industry


15
Hierarchy of Proppant Conductivity
Highest Conductivity
Highest Production, EUR, ROI
Ceramic -
Engineered product
Ultra-high strength
Mono-size and spherical
High strength
Uniform size and shape
Thermal resistant
Medium strength
Irregular size and shape
Low strength
Irregular size and shape
Sand -
Naturally occurring product
Conductivity
=
Permeability
of
the
frac
x
width
of
the
frac
=
K
x
W
Ultra-conductive Ceramic
Tier 1 –
High conductivity
Ceramic
Tier 2 –
Medium conductivity
Resin-coated Sand
Tier 3 –
Low conductivity
Sand
Chart prepared by and
property of CARBO
frac
frac


The Stakeholders
-
E&P Operators, Service Companies, Royalty
Owners, State Agencies…..
Industry Awareness of Low Quality Chinese Ceramics
………are becoming more aware of the losses to well
Production and EUR that can occur when using low quality,
low
conductivity
Chinese
ceramic
proppants,
or
other
low
quality proppants, and the subsequent loss of revenue
………are becoming more aware of the need to test Proppant
and know what they are paying for.  CARBO is committed to
quality and testing –
everyday.


Proppant Quality Matters in Well Production
As
an
E&P
Operator
investing
$4M
$12M
on
a
well,
how
much
Production
&
EUR
are
you
sacrificing
by
using
low
quality
Chinese
ceramic
proppant?
Chinese 20/40
IDC  # 1C
Chinese 20/40
IDC  # 2C
Chinese 20/40
IDC  # 3C
Field Samples #1, #2, #3 taken in North Dakota from 3 Chinese Suppliers
Bottom Row Represents Whole Pellet Cross Sections
Production & EUR Loss
due to Poor Quality:
Irregular Size &
Shape reducing
flowrates
Rough Surface
reducing flowrates
High Internal Porosity
leads to Low
Strength & Crushing
as Closure Stress
Increases
All lead to Reduced
Frac Conductivity


CARBO vs Low Quality Chinese Ceramic
Chinese 20/40
IDC  # 1C
CARBOLITE
20/40
Chinese 20/40
IDC  # 2C
Chinese 20/40
IDC  # 3C
Bottom Row Represents Whole Pellet Cross Sections
Field Samples #1, #2, #3 taken in North Dakota from 3 Chinese Suppliers
Comparison of three field samples from North Dakota from low quality, low
Conductivity
Chinese
ceramic
proppant
suppliers,
compared
to
CARBOLITE
:


CARBO vs Low Quality Chinese Ceramic
Chinese 20/40
IDC  # 4C
CARBOLITE
20/40
Chinese 20/40
IDC  # 5C
Chinese 20/40
IDC  # 6C
Three
more
field
samples
of
low
quality,
low
Conductivity
Chinese
ceramic
proppant
suppliers,
compared
to
CARBOLITE
:
Bottom Row Represents Whole Pellet Cross Sections
Field Samples #4, #5, #6 taken in North Dakota from 3 more Chinese Suppliers


CARBO vs Brazilian & Russian Ceramic
Brazilian 20/40    
LDC   # B1
CARBOLITE
20/40
Two Brazilian
& one Russian
field samples of low quality, low Conductivity
lightweight
ceramic
proppant
suppliers,
compared
to
CARBOLITE
:
Bottom Row Represents Whole Pellet Cross Sections
Field Samples #B1 taken in South Texas; 
#B2, #R1 taken in North Dakota
Brazilian 20/40    
LDC   # B2
Russian  20/40
LDC   # R1


21
+20%
Bakken Operator
CARBO
vs Chinese
+120,000 bbl
30 Day Cum Oil
*EUR
*Operator projected EUR
6 wells with
CARBOECONOPROP low
density ceramic (LDC)
4 wells with Chinese
intermediate density
ceramic (IDC)
Frac Design
(per well)
~ 24 stages
~  3 million lbs
Average
ECONOPROP
Average
Chinese
IDC
Average
ECONOPROP
Average
Chinese IDC


Effects of Pressure
and Temperature on Sand
Northern White Sand 20/40
Sand Crushes into fine particles
Conductivity = only 215 md-ft
Conditions:
Loss of frac width
Particles plug flow channels
Leads to loss of Conductivity
9,000
psi,
250 F
Flowing 2% KCL for 30 days
Cross sections of Proppant pack shown
At 9,000 psi, the Sand experienced
severe crushing and the conductivity
was only 215 md-ft
x
y


Effects of Sand Crushing at Higher Pressure
W
frac    
Less  W
frac
White Sand
@6,000 psi stress
White Sand
@12,000 psi stress
Crushing reduces frac width and the “Space to Flow”
….most wells are conductivity limited with Sand


Ceramic vs Sand -
Realistic* Conductivity   (20/40 mesh)
Bakken Stress Range
Eagle Ford Stress Range
*Reduced
Baseline
conductivity
by
60%
for
the
effects
of
non-darcy flow, multi-phase flow, gel damage, etc.
Md-ft
Md-ft
Closure Stress  (psi)
Haynesville Stress Range
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Ceramic -
CARBOLITE
Sand -
White


“Over 150 SPE papers have been written
documenting the benefits of increased
conductivity on well Production and EUR. 
Generally, the payout on the additional
Proppant
investment
is
less
than
2
-
6
months,
and increases Production and EUR in a range of
20% to 100%.”
Case Histories


Ceramic Success Grows Into Key Basins


50,000’
view
1,000’
view
Ground view
Bakken
Ceramic
Proppant
Growth
Continues
SPE Paper 163827–
Liberty Resources


SPE
Paper
163827–
Liberty
Resources
Feb 2013 @ SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Conference by Dr M. Pearson
37 Wells from Williams County
90 Day Production Bubble-Plot
Liberty
Resources
wells
(RED)
49,100 BBLs
29,100 BBLs
19,100 BBls
LR
LR
Bakken   ( Liberty Resources )
outperform
offset
wells


Bakken  ( Statoil / Brigham Exploration )
SPE
Paper
134595
&
146376
Brigham
Exp/Statoil


Ceramic Success Grows Into Key Basins


50,000’
view
1,000’
view
Ground view
Eagle Ford (4,000 wells*)
* Public data : Unknown proppant type not included
in analysis: Ceramic proppant verified through
internal CARBO data
*NPI = Best 3 Months Production/Perforated Lateral Length = BOE/Ft
(BOE/Ft)
Ceramic completions offer a
20% -
60% improvement
Normalized Production Indicator*


Karnes County (600 wells*)
50,000’
view
1,000’
view
Ground view
* Public data : Unknown proppant type not
included in analysis: Ceramic proppant verified
through internal CARBO data
Normalized Production Indicator
*NPI = Best 3 Months Production/Perforated Lateral Length = BOE/Ft
(BOE/Ft)
Ceramic completions offer a
20% -
40% improvement


Karnes County Operator (300* wells)
50,000’
view
1,000’
view
Ground view
* Public data : Unknown proppant type not included
in analysis: Ceramic proppant verified through
internal CARBO data
*NPI = Best 3 Months Production/Perforated Lateral Length = BOE/Ft
(BOE/Ft)
Ceramic
completions offer
a 30% -
50%
improvement


Ceramic Success Grows Into Key Basins


Permian Basin Bone Spring
* Public data : Unknown proppant type not included
in analysis: Ceramic proppant verified through
internal CARBO data


Ceramic Success Grows Into Key Basins


How to Increase the Recovery Factor
In horizontal wells in resource plays, there are two critical factors
that determine the level of economic success
1.) Creating large reservoir contact area, through multiple, transverse frac stages
2.) Building
high
conductivity,
durable
fracs
with
a
“life-of-the-well”
flow
channel
The majority of fracs today are complex (non-planar), and
conductivity limited……….they need more conductivity
Total F&D costs could be reduced by drilling a smaller number of
effectively stimulated wells……….versus drilling more infill wells
on smaller spacing
Proved by well testing, limited effective drainage areas, refracs, lab testing of proppants, infill
drilling
High pressure losses within the frac caused by limited conductivity, constricts Production


Page 2-19


We take customers from high risk containments
Un-lined,
permeable dirt
berm
Tanks sitting on
pea gravel &
corroding
Un-lined tanks
corroding inside
& outside
High risk for spills
& higher LOE:


To industry-leading environmental protection
Lined
containment,
impermeable
Tank bases
prevent
corrosion
Lined tanks,
prevents
corrosion
Minimize risk
for spills &
lower LOE:
More than 6,000 installations, with 100% environmental success


Client Base is Growing & Market will Change
Market Segments
Polymer
Coatings
HDPE
Liners
Dirt Berm
Client Growth, 2009-2013
2010
2012
2011
2009
2013
11
25
68
119
178
We believe the industry and the regulatory
bodies will continue to gain awareness of
the high environmental spill risks associated
with dirt berms and HDPE (plastic)
containments
Dirt Berms will likely continue to be             
“regulated”
out
We continue to push growth through:
Environmental Stewardship message
Business Risk Reduction message
Geographic Expansion
New Products
Falcon


Finance


CARBO Financials
* Cash from operations is equal to net
income plus depreciation and
amortization and non-cash stock
compensation
231
284
300
388
342
473
626
646
667
0
300
600
900
1,200
1,500
1,800
2,100
2,400
2,700
3,000
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
$1,000
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Revenue $M
NAM Total Rigcount
57
70
71
84
80
110
171
156
138
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
$200
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Cash From Operations $M
45
52
50
60
53
79
130
106
85
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
$200
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Net Income $M


CARBO Financials 
Cash Flow Per Share = Cash from operations
(= net income plus depreciation and
amortization and non-cash stock based
compensation)/diluted shares
1.88
2.14
2.02
2.46
2.27
3.40
5.62
4.59
3.67
$0.00
$1.00
$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
$5.00
$6.00
$7.00
$8.00
$9.00
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Earnings Per Share
231
284
300
388
342
473
626
646
667
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Revenue $M
2.33
2.88
2.91
3.57
3.47
4.80
7.43
6.80
6.02
$0.00
$1.00
$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
$5.00
$6.00
$7.00
$8.00
$9.00
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Cash Flow Per Share


Dividends Increased -
13 Years
$ Per Share
Shares -
Millions
$0.20
$0.23
$0.24
$0.25
$0.29
$0.36
$0.44
$0.52
$0.62
$0.70
$0.76
$0.88
$1.02
$1.14
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
$0.00
$0.10
$0.20
$0.30
$0.40
$0.50
$0.60
$0.70
$0.80
$0.90
$1.00
$1.10
$1.20
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Dividend Amount Paid Per Share Per Year
Shares Outstanding


Industry Factors
First Quarter of 2014
Activity quarter-to-date impacted by harsh weather conditions in the Bakken
and northern regions of NAM.
Railroads’
operational
issues
and
congestion
have
severely
impacted
the
distribution of Proppant
Fracturing well-site activity has been negatively impacted by the cold   
weather
Anticipate ceramic proppant volumes will be somewhat below fourth
quarter 2013 ceramic proppant volumes
We remain positive on activity levels and our ceramic proppant demand for
Q2 and the balance of the year
Full Year 2014


Create value by lowering E&P Operators F&D costs and increasing the
Recovery Factor
Differentiate by continuing to develop industry leading technology
Grow our client’s knowledge of
CARBO
as the leading Production
Enhancement company focused on fracs, with technologies that make oil
& gas wells produce better and increase recovery (EUR)
Stress to E&P the investment benefits of making informed decisions on
Design-Build-Optimize
Fracs,
that
strikes
a
balance
of
EUR
with
AFE
Grow Falcon Technologies through product development to address
industry environmental needs, and geographical expansion.
Continue to grow cashflow and build an enduring Company
Summary


....provides industry leading technology for Production Enhancement
and Environmental Services
Howard
Weil
42
nd
Annual
Energy
Conference
New Orleans, Louisiana
March 25, 2014


Cash Flow from Operations Reconciliation
$ in 000s
Results from Continuing Operations
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Net Income
45,463
$    
52,245
$    
49,641
$    
60,405
$    
52,810
$    
78,716
$    
130,136
105,933
$  
84,886
$    
Plus: depreciation and amortization
10,935
     
15,630
     
19,895
     
24,638
     
24,905
     
27,728
     
36,015
     
44,893
     
47,472
      
Plus: non-cash stock compensation
-
              
2,311
       
1,709
       
2,052
       
2,571
       
3,812
       
4,719
       
5,335
       
5,837
       
Cash Flow from Continuing Operations
56,398
$    
70,186
$    
71,245
$    
87,095
$    
80,286
$    
110,256
$  
170,870
156,161
$  
138,195
$  
Weighted Average Shares Oustanding
24,177
     
24,400
     
24,451
     
24,418
     
23,112
     
22,977
     
23,012
     
22,969
     
22,957
      
Cash Flow Per Share
2.33
$       
2.88
$       
2.91
$       
3.57
$       
3.47
$       
4.80
$       
7.43
$       
6.80
$       
6.02
$       
For The Years Ended Dec 31
Cash from operations is equal to net income plus depreciation and amortization and non-cash stock
compensation